BANCROFT LIBRARY THE LIBRARY OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA C/ -UC ^6t>T-cxC C< . 1C HANDBOOK OF HISTORY, DIPLOMACY, AND GOVERNMENT HANDBOOK OF THE HISTORY, DIPLOMACY, AND GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES for BY ALBERT BUSHNELL HART, Ic // PROFESSOR OF HISTORY IN HARVARD UNIVERSITY CAMBRIDGE PRINTED FOR THE UNIVERSITY 1901 Hz* Copyright, 1902, BY HARVARD UNIVERSITY. UNIVERSITY PRESS JOHN WILSON AND SON CAMBRIDGE, U.S.A. KNCROtt PREFACE THIS book is intended to form a groundwork for three lecture courses given in Harvard University. It contains such apparatus of lists of authorities, materials, and lec- tures, and such suggestion for reading, written work, and examination, as may set the student on the road ; how far, how swiftly, and how safely he goes, must then depend upon his own abilities and resolution. The book is founded on several previous publications of a similar kind, published under the titles " Outlines," " Suggestions for Students," and " Revised Suggestions," but the material has been carefully worked over for the present book. The important part which relates to the weekly papers in United States history has been thoroughly revised, recast, and verified by Mr. W. E. Dorman, for several years the efficient assistant in that work. The subjects for special reports in History 13 have been also culled and restated by Dr. Elliot H. Goodwin and Mr. W. H. Gushing. Mr. D. M. Matteson has verified and enlarged many of the references. ALBERT BUSHNELL HART. CAMBRIDGE, November 12, 1901. CONTEXTS PART I. PRELIMINARY SUGGESTIONS PAGE 1. The Three Courses in American History, Diplomacy, and Gov- ernment 9 2. Ground of the Courses 10 3. Choice and Succession of Courses 12 4. Previous Preparation 14 5. Time necessary for the Courses 15 6. Methods employed in the Courses 15 PART II. MATERIALS 7. Use of Books 17 8. Libraries available 17 9. Text-books 19 10. Essential Reference Books 21 11. Special Collections in History 22 12. Special Collections in Diplomacy 25 13. Special Collections in Government 27 PART III. LECTURES 14. Character of the Lectures 30 15. Attendance 31 16. Note-taking , 31 17. Historical Geography 31 18. Personality 32 2 CONTENTS PAGE 19. List of Lectures in History 13. (Constitutional .and Political History of the United States, 1781-1865) 34 19a. Elements of United States History 35 196. (1775-1788) First Federal Government 36 19c. (1786-1793) The Federal Constitution 38 19 19h] TERRITORY AND SLAVERY 49 7-14; E. G. Bourne, Essays in Historical Criti- cism, No. ix ; H. Von Hoist, United States, III, chs. iv, vii-x, xii ; J. Lowell, Biglow Papers. Lect. 67. (1846-1849) Wilrnot Proviso and crisis over territo- rial slavery ; and Lewis Cass : Handbook, 20(/, 42, 115; Guide, 196; Contemporaries, IV, 15- 18 ; A. C. McLaughlin, Lewis Cass. Lect. 68. (1849-1850) Compromise of 1850; and Daniel Web- ster : Guide, 197; Contemporaries, IV, 19-22; J. F. Rhodes, United States, I, ch. ii; A. Johnston, American Orations, II, 123-218; C. Schurz, Henry Clay, II, ch. xxvi; H. C. Lodge, Daniel Webster. Lect. 69. (1850-1860) Fugitive slaves, underground railroad, and Personal Liberty bills ; and Wendell Phillips : Guide, 198 ; Contemporaries, IV, 29-33 ; W. H. Siebert, Underground Railroad M. G. McDougall, Fugitive Slaves, 52-83; T. W. Higginson, Wen- dell Phillips; C. F. Adams, Richard H. Dana^ I, chs. xiv, xv. Lect. 70. (1853-1854) Kansas Nebraska Bill and Cuba ; and Stephen A. Douglas: Handbook, 54, 84; Guide^ 199 ; Contemporaries, IV, 34, 46 ; American History Leaflets, Nos. 2, 17 ; A. B. Hart, Salmon P. Chase, ch. v ; W. G. Brown, Stephen A. Douglas. Lect. 71. (1854-1857) The struggle for Kansas: Guide, 200; Contemporaries, IV, 36-40; Nicolay and Hay, Abraham Lincoln, I, chs. xxii-xxv, II, chs. i, vi ; James F. Rhodes, United States, II, chs. vii-ix. Lect. 72. (1854-1859) The rise of the Republican Party; and Salmon P. Chase: Handbook, 55; Guide, 201, 202 ; Contemporaries, IV, 35 ; A. B. Hart, Salmon P. Chase. Lect. 73. (1857-1860) Dred-Scott decision and principles of 50 HISTORY LECTURES [ political anti-slavery ; and Roger B. Taney : Guide, 201, 202; Contemporaries, IV, 41-46; Amer- ican History Leaflets, No. 23 ; M. Hill, Liberty Documents, ch. xxi ; S. Tyler, Roger B. Taney, ch. v. Lect. 74. (1840-1860) Principles of radical abolition ; and John Brown : Handbook, 56 ; Guide, 202 ; Contem- poraries, IV, 45-48 ; H. Von Hoist, John Brown ; F. Sanborn, John Brown ; J. Redpath, John Brown. Lect. 75. (1859-1860) Presidential election of 1860 ; and Abraham Lincoln: Guide, 203; Contemporaries, IV, 49-52 ; F. Bancroft, William H. Seward, I, ch. xxiv ; J. F. Rhodes, United States, II, ch. xi; C. Schurz, Abraham Lincoln; J. T. Morse, Abra- ham Lincoln. igi. (1860-1861) Coming on of the Civil War. PARALLEL READINGS ON THE PERIOD : Bibliography in Guide, 56a (p. 184), 566 (pp. 193, 194). Sources in Contemporaries, IV, 49-74 ; William Mac- Donald, Select Documents, Nos. 93-97; American History Leaflets, Nos. 12, 18. Frederic Bancroft, William H. Seward, II, chs. xxv, xxviii, xxix. George Ticknor Curtis, Constitutional History, II, ch. x (pp. 300-338). Judson S. Landon, Constitutional History, ch. xi (pp. 207- 249). Abraham Lincoln, Works, I, 652-695, II, 1-33. John T. Morse, Abraham Lincoln, I, ch. vii. James Ford Rhodes, United States, III, chs. xiii, xiv. Alexander H. Stephens, War between the States, II, chs. xviii-xx. 19h, 19i] COMING ON OF CIVIL WAR 51 WEEKLY PAPERS IN THE GROUP: No. 26. Doctrine of secession : Handbook, 57. No. 27. Responsibility for the Civil War : Handbook, 58. Lect. 76. (1789-1861) Theory of secession ; and Alexander H. Stephens : Handbook, 57 ; Guide, 205 ; Contem- poraries, IV, 53-57; A. H. Stephens, War be- tween the States, I, ch. xi. Lect. 77. (1850-1861) Causes of secession; and Robert Toombs : Guide, 205 ; Toombs in Stephen's War between the States, II, App. ; A. Johnston, American Orations, III, 235-274, 294-311; P. A. Stovall, Robert Toombs. Lect. 78. (1860-1861) Process of secession: Guide, 206; Contemporaries, IV, 58-62; texts, American History Leaflets, No. 12. Lect. 79. (1860-1861) Questions of coercion; and James Buchanan: Guide, 207; Contemporaries, IV, 64, 67; J. Buchanan, Mr. Buchanan's Adminis- tration. Lect. 80. (1860-1861) Propositions of compromise; and Wil- liam H. Seward : Guide, 207 ; Contemporaries, IV, 63-69; A. B. Hart, Salmon P. Chase, ch. viii; A. Johnston, American Orations, III, 275-293, 312- 319 ; F. Bancroft, W. H. Seward. Lect. 81. (1861) The status of Fort Sumter: Guide, 208; Contemporaries, IV, 70 ; Nicolay and Hay, Abra- ham Lincoln, III, chs. xxiii-xxvi, IV, chs. i, ii. Lect. 82. (1861) Outbreak of the war; and Robert E. Lee: Handbook, 58 ; Guide, 208 ; Contemporaries, IV, 71-74; American History Leaflets, No. 18; Nicolay and Hay, Abraham Lincoln, IV ; W. P. Trent, Robert E. Lee. 52 HISTORY LECTURES [ igj. (1861-1865) The Civil War. PARALLEL READINGS ON THE PERIOD: Bibliography in Guide, 56a (p. 184), 565 (p. 194). Sources in Contemporaries, IV, 75-144; William Mac- Donald, Select Statutes. John T. Morse, Abraham Lincoln, I, chs. viii-xii, II. James Ford Rhodes, United States, III, IV. WEEKLY PAPERS IN THE GROUP : No. 28. Lincoln's democracy : Handbook, 59. No. 29. Military powers of the President: Handbook, 60. No. 30. Reconstruction: Handbook, 61. Lect. 83. (1861-1865) The political problem ; and Abraham Lincoln : Handbook, 59 ; Guide, 208 ; Contem- poraries, IV, 75-79, 96, 97, 101; American His- tory Leaflets, Nos. 18, 26 ; N. Hapgood, Abraham Lincoln ; J. T. Morse, Abraham Lincoln ; C. Schurz, Abraham Lincoln,; G. Welles, Lincoln and Seward. Lect. 84. (1861-1865) The Southern Confederacy; and Jef- ferson Davis : Guide, 209 ; Contemporaries, IV, 80-83, 91-95; T. H. Alfriend, Jefferson Davis; J. Davis, Rise and Fall of the Confederate Government. Lect. 85. (1861-1865) The military problem; and U. S. Grant: Guide, 210; Contemporaries, IV, 84- 90, 102-123, 132-140; O. Wister, U. S. Grant; U. S. Grant, Memoirs. Lect. 86. (1861-1865) The diplomacy of the Civil War; and Charles Francis Adams : Handbook, 20A, 85- 88; Guide, 212; Contemporaries, IV, 98-100; C. F. Adams, Jr., Charles Francis Adams. Lect. 87. (1861-1865) Social, economic, and financial con- ditions of the Civil War: Guide, 204, 211, 213; 19j, 20] THE CIVIL WAR 53 Contemporaries, IV, 75-101; A. B. Hart, Sal- mon P. Ckase, chs. viii, ix, xi ; D. R. Dewey, Finan- cial History. Lect. 88. (1861-1865) Abolition of slavery ; and Abraham Lincoln: Guide, 214; Contemporaries, IV, 124- 131 ; M. Hill, Liberty Documents, ch. xxii ; A. B. Hart, Salmon P. Chase, ch. x; Nicolay and Hay, Abraham Lincoln, especially VI, chs. v-viii, xvii, xix, X, ch. iv ; J. T. Morse, Abraham Lincoln ; II, chs. i, iv, xii; F. Carpenter, Six Months in the White House. Lect. 89. (1861-1865) Military government for civilians ; and Edwin M. Stanton: Handbook, 60; Guide, 213; J. F. Rhodes, United States, IV, ch. xix;.G. C. Gorham. Edwin M. Stanton. Lect. 90. (1865) Problems at the end of the war ; and Thad- deus Stevens: Handbook, 61; Contemporaries, IV, 141-157; W. MacDonald, Select Statutes; M. Hill, Liberty Documents, ch. xxiii ; W. A. Dunning, Essays on the Civil War and Reconstruction ; A. B. Hart, Salmon P. Chase, chs. xiii, xiv; S. A. McCall, Thaddeus Stevens. 20. List of Lectures in History 14 (American Diplo- macy). The course covers the whole field of diplomacy respecting America. The first half-year will include the period 1492 to 1815 ; the second half-year covers the time from 1815 to the present day. Abbreviated references in this list are as follows : Arbitrations John Bassett Moore, History and Digest of the International Arbitrations to which the United States has been a Party (6 vols., Washington, 1895). 54 DIPLOMATIC LECTURES [ Contemporaries Albert Bushnell Hart, American History told by Contemporaries (4 vols., N. Y., 1897-1901). Digest Francis Wharton, A Digest of the International Law of the United States (3 vols., Washington, 1886). Foundations Albert Bushnell Hart, The Foundations of American Foreign Policy (N. Y., 1901). Guide Edward Channing and Albert Bushnell Hart, Guide to the Study of American History (Boston, 1896). Handbook this book (Cambridge, 1901). Source-Book Albert Bushnell Hart, Source-Book of American History (N. Y., 1899). The references appended to the separate lectures are to selected monographs or to special treatment in secondary works ; they do not in general include detailed references to books included in the "Parallel Readings" nor to sources, and they call attention to only a small part of the available literature. 2oa. (1492-1607) European Claims to America. PARALLEL READINGS ON THE PERIOD : Bibliography in Guide, 56a (p. 181), 56 (pp. 185-186). J. R. Seeley, Expansion of England, course i, lects. iii-vii. Justin Winsor, Christopher Columbus. Justin Winsor, Narrative and Critical History, II, III, chs. i-iv, IV, chs. i, ii. Digest, 2, 6, 209. WEEKLY PAPERS IN THE GROUP : No. 1. Basis of European claims to wild territory: Hand- book, 63. No. 2. Foundations of English claims to America: Hand- book, 64. 20-20a] EUROPEAN CLAIMS TO AMERICA 55 Lect. 1. Aims and methods of the course ; and materials : Bib- liography and suggestions in Handbook, 1-10, 12, 20, 62-92, 135-137; Foundations, ch. viii; Guide^ 17, 21, 25, 28, 29, 32, 35. Lect. 2. Territorial and commercial conceptions : rivalries in Europe ; conditions of foreign trade ; Oriental trade : Contemporaries, I, 44-47 ; J. R. Seeley, Growth of British Policy, I, part i, ch. vi. Lect. 3. (1492-1500) Discovery of America and diplomatic adjustments : Bull of 1493 ; treaty of Tordesillas : Handbook, 63; Guide, 82-84; Contemporaries, I, 17-20; Source-Book, 1 ; J. Winsor, Colum- bus; E. G. Bourne, Essays in Historical Criticism, Nos. vi-viii; H. Harrisse, Diplomatic History of America. Lect. 4. (1500-1600) Spanish explorations and establishment of Spanish colonies : Handbook, 67 ; Guide, 85, 86 ; Contemporaries, I, 21-25 ; B. Moses, Spanish Rule ; R. G. Watson, Spanish and Portuguese in South America, I; J. Winsor, Narrative and Crit- ical History, II, chs. iii-viii. Lect. 5. (1498-1600) English discoveries and claims ; Armada of 1588: Handbook, 64; Guide, 92-96; Con- temporaries, I, 26-33,48; Source-Book, 2, 4, 5 ; J. A. Doyle, English Colonies, I, ch. iv ; C. P. Lucas, Historical Geography, V, ch. i ; J. Winsor, Mississippi Basin, ch. xv. Lect. 6. (1536-1600) .French discoveries and claims: Guide, 87-89; Contemporaries, I, 34-36; Source- Book, 6 ; J. Winsor, Cartier to Frontenac, chs. i-iii, ix-xiii; J. A. Doyle, English Colonies, I, 82- 100. 56 DIPLOMATIC LECTURES [ 2ob. (1607-1689) Rival Colonial Systems. PARALLEL READINGS ON THE PERIOD : Bibliography in Guide, 90, 91, 97, 104. J. R. Seeley, Growth of .British Policy, I, parts ii-iv. Justin Winsor, Cartier to Frontenac. Justin Winsor, Narrative and Critical History, III, chs. v, vi, IV, chs. in, v, viii, ix. WEEKLY PAPER IN THE GROUP : No. 3. Theory of Indian land-holding : Handbook, 65. Lect. 7. (1600-1700) Treaties with the Indians: Handbook, 65 ; Contemporaries, I, 60, 64, 91, 92, 113, 123, 127, 133, 152. Lect. 8. (1600-1689) English-foreign relations in America: treaties of St. Germain (1632), Westphalia (1648), Breda (1667), Madrid (1670): Guide, 90, 91, 131; Contemporaries, I, 37, 43; Source-Book, 36. Lect. 9. (1620-1664) The Dutch and the Swedes expelled: Guide, 104,107; Contemporaries,!, 150-155, 158, 159. Lect. 10. (1660-1690) The English Acts of Trade: piracy and smuggling ; and Edward Randolph : Handbook, 66; Guide, 133 ; Contemporaries, I, 83, 154, II, 19, 45, 46, 85, 87; American History Leaf- lets, No. 19; W. MacDonald, Select Charters, Nos. 22, 23, 25, 28, 34; E. Channing, Navigation Laws ; G. L. Beer, Commercial Policy of England toward the Colonies* chs. i-iv ; W. J. Ashley, Surveys, Historic and Economic, 309-360 ; Edward Ran- dolph, Letters P. S. Reinsch, Colonial Govern- ment. 20b, 20c] STRUGGLE FOR SUPREMACY 57 2oc. (1689-1763) Struggle for Supremacy in America. PARALLEL READINGS ON THE PERIOD : Bibliography in Guide, 56 (p. 181), 56b (p. 188), 131, 132. Montagu Burrows, Foreign Policy of Great Britain, chs. iii-vi. W. E. H. Lecky, England in the Eighteenth Century, I-III. A. T. Mahan, Influence of Sea Power on History, 1600- 1783. Francis Parkman, Frontenac and New France / Half- Cen- tury of Conflict ; Montcalm and Wolfe. Spencer Walpole, Foreign delations, ch. i. Justin Winsor, Narrative and Critical History, IV, chs. iv, vii, V, chs. i, vii, viii. Justin Winsor, Mississippi Basin. WEEKLY PAPERS IN THE GROUP: No. 4. Execution of the Acts of Trade : Handbook, 66. No. 5. Execution of the Spanish colonial policy: Handbook, 67. No. 6. Rule of 1756: Handbook, 68. Lect. 11. (1689-1740) Intercolonial wars : Spanish Succession ; Louisiana; Indian allies; treaties of Ryswick (1697), Utrecht (1715), Assiento ; Boundaries of Florida; and Louis XIV: Guide, 131 ; Contemporaries, II, 117-121 ; J. W. Gerard, Peace of Utrecht. Lect. 12. (1740-1756) War renewed: claims on the Ohio; sea power; peace of Aix la Ohapelle (1748) ; war in the West (1754); and Robert Walpole: Guide, 132; Contemporaries, II, 122-127; A. T. Mahan, Sea Power, chs. vii, viii. Lect. 13. (1756-1763) Seven Years' War : privateering; neu- tral trade and the Rule of 1756; treaty of Paris (1763) ; reconstruction of the map of America; and 58 DIPLOMATIC LECTURES [ Earl of Chatham: Handbook, 68; Guide, 132; Contemporaries, II, 128, 129; Source-Book, 38-40 ; American History Leaflets, No. 5 ; F. Parkman, Montcalm and Wolfe ; B. Fernow, Ohio Valley in Colonial Days, chs. iv-vii ; F. Snow, Cases, 47 ; H. Wheaton, History of the Law of Nations, 200-229. Lect. 14. (1689-1775) Intercolonial relations : judicial appeals ; representation in England; Proclamation of 1763; the Quebec Act: Guide, 133, 135; Contem- poraries, II, 73 ; T. Roosevelt, Winning of the West, I ; V. Coffin, Province of Quebec, chs. v, vi. Lect 15. (1689-1775) Foreign immigration : English ; Hugue- not; German; Scotch-Irish; Irish; West Indian; slave-trade; naturalization and denization: Guide, 145 ; R. Mayo-Smith, Emigration and Immigra- tion, 12-15, 33-40; E. E. Proper, Colonial Immigra- tion Laws. 2od. (1775-1788) Diplomacy of the Revolution and the Confederation. PARALLEL READINGS ON THE PERIOD : Bibliography in Guide, 5Ga (p. 182), 566 (pp. 189, 190). George Bancroft, United States (last revision), IV- VI. John W. Foster, Century of American Diplomacy, chs. i, ii. Foundations, 1-5, 14, 23, 42-44, 57-61. W. E. H. Lecky, England in the Eighteenth Century, IV, chs. xiv, xv. Theodore Lyman, American Diplomacy, I, chs. i-vii, xi- xiii. John T. Morse, John Adams, chs. vii-ix. George Pellew, John Jay, chs. vi-ix. William Henry Trescot, Diplomacy of the Revolution. 20c, 20d] REVOLUTION 59 Francis Wharton, Diplomatic Correspondence of the Revo- lution, I, Introduction. Henry Wheaton, History of the Law of Nations, 290-309. Justin Winsor, Narrative and Critical History, VI, chs. vii, viii, VII, chs. i, ii, iii (Note A). WEEKLY PAPERS IN THE GROUP : No. 7. Territorial policy of the Continental Congress : Handbook, 69. No. 8. Breaking instructions of Congress: Handbook, 70. No. 9. Navigation of the Mississippi and St. Lawrence: Handbook, 71. Lect. 16. (1774-1776) The new nation: formation; govern- ment; Declaration of Independence ; question of rec- ognition : Guide, 136, 137; Contemporaries, II, 184-189. Lect. 17. (1775-1781) Organization of a foreign office: com- mittees ; representatives abroad ; superintendent ; and Robert R. Livingston : Guide, 153 ; Contempora- ries, II, 199 ; Wharton, Diplomatic Correspond- ence, I. Lect. 18. (1775-1782) Military and naval questions: belliger- ency; privateering; prize; spies; prisoners; conquests; and John Paul Jones: Contemporaries, II, 177, 178, 183, 194, 201, 213, 214; A. C. Buell, Paul Jones. Lect. 19. (1776-1778) Negotiations with France: loans; Span- ish relations ; treaties of 1778; subsidies; and Silas Deane : Guide, 139 ; New York Historical Society, Deane Papers ; Digest, 148. Lect. 20. (1776-1788) National colonization : Northwest con- quests; early territories ; Indian wars; Indian treaties of 1778-1788 ; and George Rogers Clark : Handbook, 69; Guide, 150; American History Leaflets, 60 DIPLOMATIC LECTURES [ Nos. 22, 32 ; T. Roosevelt, 'Winning of the West, II, III ; J. Winsor, Westward Movement. Lect. 21. (1778-1782) Commercial negotiations on the Conti- nent: Armed Neutrality of 1780; and John Adams: Guide, 153 ; John Adams, Works, VII Lect. 22. (1776-1782) Negotiations with England: peace ne- gotiations of 1778 ; instructions of 1778 ; instructions of 1781; and Lord North: Guide, 139, 141; W. B. Donne, Correspondence of George III and Lord North. Lect. 23. (1782-1783) Negotiations for peace : preliminary treaty of Paris (1782); definitive treaty (1783); and Benjamin Franklin: Handbook, 70; Guide, 141 ; Contemporaries, II, 215-217, III, 48 ; Digest, 150. Lect. 24. (1782-1788) General commercial negotiations : Swed- ish treaty of 1783 ; Prussian treaty of 1785 ; Barbary powers ; Spanish boundary ; Mississippi question and draft treaty (1786) ; French consular convention (1788); and Thomas Jefferson: Handbook, 71; Guide, 153; H. S. Randall, Thomas Jefferson, I, chs. xi-xiii ; Earl of Sheffield, Observations. Lect. 25. (1783-1788) Relations with England: boundaries; West Indian trade ; commerce ; posts ; debts ; negroes; loyalists; and William Pitt: Guide, 153; Contemporaries, III, 49-53, 92; Arbitrations, I, 1-5, 90-118, 271-273; Earl Russell, Charles James Fox; Earl Stanhope, William Pitt. 2oe. (1789-1815) Complications of the Napoleonic Wars. PARALLEL READINGS ON THE PERIOD : Bibliography in Handbook, I9d, 19e; Guide, 56a (p. 183), 566 (pp. 190, 191). 20d, 20e] PERIOD OF NAPOLEONIC WARS 61 Sources in Contemporaries, 111, 93-98, 111-129. Henry Adams, History of the United States during the Administrations of Jefferson and Madison. John W. Foster, Century of American Diplomacy, chs. iv-vii. Daniel C. Gilman, James Monroe, chs. iii, iv. Theodore Lyman, American Diplomacy, I, chs. vi-x. A. T. Mahan, Influence of Sea Power upon the French Revo- lution and Empire. William Henry Trescot, Diplomatic History of the Admin- istrations of Washington and Adams. Justin Winsor, Narrative and Critical History, VII, ch. vii. WEEKLY PAPERS IN THE GROUP: No. 10. Policy of American isolation : Handbook, 72. No. 11. Was France entitled to complain of the Jay treaty? Handbook, 73. No. 12. Allegiance and impressment: Handbook, 74. No. 13. Status of territory annexed but not yet organized : Handbook, 75. No. 14. Legal objections to the Orders in Council and Decrees : Handbook, 76. No. 15. Fishery rights in and about the Gulf of St. Law- rence : Handbook, 77. Lect. 26. (1789) Status of international law: neutral trade; tradition of isolation : Handbook, 72 ; Contempo- raries, III, 26 ; H. Wheaton, History of the Law of Nations, 78-88, 106-175; M. Hill, Liberty Docu- ments, ch. xviii; M. Burrows, Foreign Policy of Great Britain, chs. vii, viii. Lect. 27. (1789-1901) Organization and development of the Department of State : officials ; functions ; directing 62 DIPLOMATIC LECTURES [ minds : Guide, 157 ; E. Schuyler, American Diplo- macy, chs. i-iii ; W. E. Curtis, United States and Foreign Powers, ch. i. Lect. 28. (1789-1794) Attempt to come to a settlement with England: execution of treaty of 1783; loyalists; posts ; debts ; negroes ; and Gouverneur Morris : Arbitrations, I, 273-274 ; T. Roosevelt, Gouverneur Morris, chs. vii-x. Lect. 29. (1689-1793) France and neutrality: Proclamation of 1793; and Edmond Genet: Guide, 162; Con- temporaries, III, 92-95; Arbitrations, V, 4399- 4414 ; H. C. Lodge, George Washington, II, ch. iv. Lect. 30. (1793-1796) Neutral trade and agreement with Eng- land : Jay treaty (1794); ratification (1796); and John Jay: Handbook, 73; Guide, 162; Con- temporaries, III, 96, 97; Arbitrations, I, 299- 316; E. Randolph, Vindication of Mr. Randolphs 'Resignation; G. Pellew, John Jay ; Digest, Lect. 31. (1789-1800) Adjustment with Spain: treaty of the Escurial (1795); Miranda project (1798); claims convention ; French influence ; draft convention of 1802; and C. C. Pinckney : Guide, 162; Arbitra- tions, II, 991-1005; Digest, 161; E. Schuyler, American Diplomacy, 271-281. Lect. 32. (1794-1800) Collision with France : Pinckney epi- sode (1796); X. Y. Z. episode (1797); informal war (1798); treaty of 1800; spoliation claims; and James Monroe : Guide, 164; Contemporaries, III, 99 ; J. Monroe, View of the Conduct of the Executive; Arbitrations, V, 4414-4432; D. C. Gil- man, James Monroe; Digest, 148a, 265-281. 20e] NAPOLEONIC PERIOD 63 Lect. 33. (1796-1802) Adjustment with England: Henfield case ; neutral trade ; impressments ; debts ; boundary commissions of 1798 ; and Rufus King : Arbitra- tions, I, 5-43 (boundaries), 271-298 (debts), 316- 349 (neutral trade) ; H. Wheaton, History of the Law of Nations, 345-401. Lect. 34. (1800-1815) Napoleon Bonaparte: influence on inter- national law ; on American diplomacy : W. M. Sloane, Napoleon .Bonaparte ; H. Adams, United States. Lect. 35. (1800-1803) Annexation of Louisiana : treaty of 1803 ; claims ; boundaries ; and Robert R. Livingston : Handbook, 75; Guide, 168; Contemporaries, III, 111-114; Source- Book, 78; Arbitrations, V ', 4432-4446 (claims); Foundations, 7, 25, 46, 62- 66 ; H. Adams, United States, I, II ; Digest, I486 ; T. Roosevelt, Winning of the West, IV, 261-286. Lect. 36. (1803-1812) West Florida question : claims conven- tion (1802); annexations of 1810 and 1812 ; diplomatic relations : Guide, 168 ; H. Adams, United States, II-V; Arbitrations, V, 4487-4494, 4519-4524. Lect. 37. (1800-1 815) Barbary wars: treaties of tribute (1795- 1800); Tunis; Tripoli; Algiers: Contemporaries, III, 108; I. N. Hollis, The Constitution ; Digest, 141 a ; E. Schuyler, American Diplomacy, ch. iv. Lect. 38. (1803-1807) Neutral trade: decisions; impress- ments ; draft treaty of 1807 ; embargo ; orders and decrees; Chesapeake-Leopard; and Thomas Jeffer- son: Handbook, 76; Guide, 170; Contempora- ries, III, 116-121; Source-Book, 79, 81; Arbitrations, V, 4447-4452; Digest, 150, 319, 320, 327, 331, 388; S. H. Gay, James Madison, chs. xv, xvii; M. Burrows, Foreign Policy of Great Britain, chs. ix-xi. 64 DIPLOMATIC LECTURES [ Lect. 39. (1808-1811) Neutral trade: draft Erskine treaty (1809); French decrees (1810) ; non-intercourse ; Jack- son, Rose, and Foster missions; and James Madi- son: Guide, 171; Contemporaries, III, 122; Source-Book, 82; Arbitrations, V, 4452-4456; S. H. Gay, James Madison. Lect. 40. (1811-1815) War of 1812 : Indian hostilities ; Pinck- ney's ultimatum ; declaration of war ; belligerent rights; prisoners; privateering and prizes; destruction of cities : Guide, 172 ; Contemporaries, III, 124, 127; Source-Book, 83-86; T. Roosevelt, Naval War of 1812 ; G. Coggeshall, American Privateers ; Arbitrations, II, 1071-1132 (General Armstrong) ; Digest, 348& ; S. H. Gay, James Madison, ch. xix. Lect. 41. (1812-1815) Negotiations for peace: mediation; treaty of Ghent (1814): Guide, 172; Contempo- raries, III, 128, 129 ; Source-Book, 87 ; C. Schurz, Henry Clay, ch. vi; J. T. Morse, John Quincy Adams, 74-98; Digest, 150c; J. A. Ste- vens, Albert Gallatin, ch. viii. Lect. 42. (1815-1818) British trade and fisheries : commercial treaties (1815) ; Fishery convention (1818) : Sand- book, 77 ; F. Snow, Treaties and Topics, 427- 440 ; C. Isham, The Fisheries, 1-49 ; J. B. Hen- derson, Diplomatic Questions, 472-501 ; Arbitra- tions, I, 350-390 (slaves), 703-710 (fisheries); Di- gest, 150c?, 301-304; F. Snow, Treaties and Topics, 427-445. Lect. 43. (1792-1828) Oregon question : Nootka Sound con- vention (1790) ; discovery of Columbia River (1792) ; expedition (1803-1806) ; settlement (1810) ; reservation of Astoria (1815) ; joint agreement (1818) ; Russian treaty (1824) ; renewed joint con- 20e, 20f] WAR AND TERRITORY 65 vention (1828): Guide, 168; Contemporaries, III, 115; Source-Book, 80; R. Greenhow, Oregon, chs. viii-xvi. Lect. 44. (1798-1830) Northeastern boundary : commission of 1798; commission of 1818; lake boundary (1822); Lake of the Woods (1827) ; arbitration treaty (1827) ; award declined (1831) : A. Gallatin, Memoir on Northeastern Boundary; Arbitrations, I, 45-138, 162-195. Lect. 45. (1815-1829) Improved international status of the United States. 2of. (1815-1829) Latin- American Diplomacy and the Monroe Doctrine. PARALLEL READINGS ON THE PERIOD : Bibliography in Handbook, 19/, 46, 79 ; Guide, 56a (p. 183), 565 (pp. 191, 192); D. C. Gilman, James Monroe, A pp. iv. Sources in American History Leaflets, No. 4 ; Contempora- ries, 142-150; Digest, 57-58a, 159; John Quincy Adams, Memoirs, IV-VIII ; Richard Rush, Memoirs of a Residence at the Court of London, especially chs. xx-xxiv. John W. Foster, Century of American Diplomacy, chs. vii, xii. Foundations, 8, 68-75. Daniel C. Gilman, James Monroe, ch. vii. John B. Henderson, American Diplomatic Questions, part iv, 289-450. Lindley Miller Keasbey, Nicaragua Canal and Monroe Doc- trine, 52-58. John H. Latane", Diplomatic Relations of the United States and /Spanish America, 1-103. Theodore Lyman, American Diplomacy, II, chs. ix-xiv. 5 66 DIPLOMATIC LECTURES [ John T. Morse, John Quincy Adams, ch. ii. W. F. Reddaway, Monroe Doctrine. Theodore Roosevelt, American Ideals, ch. xi. Freeman Snow, Treaties and Topics, 237-312, 422-427. WEEKLY PAPERS IN THE GROUP: No. 16. Doctrine of the recognition of new States: Hand- book, 78. No. 17. Extent of the Monroe Doctrine, Handbook, 79. Lect. 46. (1815-1821) Spanish cession of the Floridas : inva- sions of 1818; treaty of cession (1819); claims: Guide, 176; Contemporaries, III, 143, 144; R. Hildreth, United /States, VI, ch. xxxii; Arbitra- tions,-^, 4495-453T; Digest, 161a, 348; L. de Onis, Memoir. Lect. 47. (1808-1812) Destruction of the Spanish Empire in America: Guide, 178; J. Winsor, Narrative and Critical History, VIII, chs. iv, v ; Arbitrations, V, 1107 110o,1533 1517} H. H. Bancroft, Mexico, IV. Lect. 48. (1815-1823) Recognition of the new Latin-American States: Cuba; Isthmus; Holy Alliance of 1815; Congresses of 1818-1822; Russian claims on the Pacific; and George Canning : Guide, 178; Con- temporaries, III, 142, 145, 146; Arbitrations, I, 755-757 (Alaska, 1 ). Lect. 49. (1822-1823) The Monroe Doctrine ; and John Quincy Adams: Handbook, 79 ; Guide, 178; Contempo- raries, III, 147, 148; M. Hill, Liberty Docu- ments, ch. xx ; Arbitration*, I, 757" 760 (Alaokft)- Lect. 50. (1823-1826) The Panama Congress: Hayti; Cuba; and Henry Clay: Guide, 179; Contemporaries, III, 149, 150; J. M. Callahan, Cuba and Inter- national Relations, ch. v. 20f, 20g] MONROE DOCTRINE 67 2og. (1829-1861) Aggressive Foreign Policy. PARALLEL READINGS ON THE PERIOD: Bibliography in Handbook, 19 1593-1657 (Peru), V, 4591-4626 (Peru and Brazil). 2oh. (1861-1865) Diplomacy of the Civil War. PARALLEL READINGS ON THE PERIOD : Bibliography in Handbook, 19J; Guide, 56a (p. 184), 56 (p. 194). Charles Francis Adams, Jr., Charles Francis Adams, chs. ix-xviii. Frederic Bancroft, Life of William H. Seward, II, chs. xxx-xxxviii. 20g, 20h] THE CIVIL WAR 71 John Morton Callahan, Diplomatic History of the Southern Confederacy. John W. Foster, Century of American Diplomacy, ch. x. Nicolay and Hay, Abraham Lincoln^ IV, ch. xv, V, ch. ii, VI, chs. ii-iv, VII, ch. xiv, VIII, ch. x. James Ford Rhodes, United States, III, 415-434, 502-543, IV, 76-95, 337-394. Henry Wheaton, International Law (Boyd's ed.), 412- 537. WEEKLY PAPERS IN THE GROUP: No. 23. Effect of Lincoln's blockade proclamations: Hand- book, 85. No. 24. Doctrine of continuous voyages: Handbook, 86. Lect. 66. (1861-1865) Questions of belligerency: blockade proclamations (1861) ; French and English proclama- tions (1861) ; Trent affair (1861) ; prize cases; claims; and Abraham Lincoln : Guide, 212 ; Contempo- raries, IV, 97-99; J. R. Soley, Blockade and Cruisers; Arbitrations, I, 560-623 passim ; J. L. Harris, Trent Affair ; Digest, 359-363, 374, 383- 385 ; M. Bernard, Neutrality of Great Britain, chs. vi-x. Lect. 67. (1861-1865) Confederate diplomacy in Europe ; and John Slidell : Guide, 209 ; Contemporaries, IV, 100; J. Bigelow, France and Confederate Navy ; J. D. Bulloch, Secret Service ; J. T. Scharf, Con- federate States Navy, ch. xxvi ; R. Semmes, Service Afloat. Lect. 68. (1862-1865) Confederate cruisers: responsibility of England ; question of piracy ; and Charles Francis Adams: Contemporaries, IV, 116, 133; C. F. 72 DIPLOMATIC LECTURES [ Adams, Charles Francis Adams ; Arbitrations, I, 500-623 passim, IV, 4057-4178; M. Bernard, Neu- trality of Great Britain, chs. xi, xiv, xv ; Digest, 368, 369, 393, 401. Lect. 69. (1861-1865) Neutral trade: prize cases; contra- band and continuous voyages; and Lord John Russell : F. Snow, Cases in International Law, 462-520 passim; P. Cobbett, Cases, 327-330, 335-340; Arbitrations, I, 692-702; M. Bernard, Neutrality of Great J3ritain, ch. xiii; Digest, 368-375. Lect. 70. (1861-1865) Relations between the United States and the Confederacy : prisoners ; border trade ; Hampton Roads conference (1865) ; and Alexander H. Stephens : A. B. Hart, Salmon P. Chase, 224-229. Lect. 71. (1866-1867) The French in Mexico: invasion (1862); Empire (1863); intervention of the United States (1866) ; Mexican claims convention (1868) ; and Napoleon III : F. Bancroft, William H. Seward, II, ch. xl ; Foundations, 19 ; Arbitrations, II, 1287-1358 (claims) ; John B. Henderson, American Diplomatic Questions, 389-406 ; Digest, 58 ; J. H. Latan6, Diplomatic Relations of the United States and Spanish America, ch. v. 2oi. (1865-1890) Period of Peaceful Influence. PARALLEL READINGS ON THE PERIOD: Bibliography in Guide, 56a (p. 184), 565 (pp. 194, 195). John W. Foster, Century of American Diplomacy, ch. xi. Foundations, 19, 20, 27, 28, 39, 40, 53-55. WEEKLY PAPERS IN THE GROUP : No. 25. Right of expatriation : Handbook, 87. 20h, 20i] PEACEFUL INFLUENCE 73 No. 26. Consequential damages : Handbook, 88. No. 27. Questions of the Isthmus Canal : Handbook, 89. Lect. 72. (1867-1875) Personal relations: immigration and naturalization; German treaty (1868); and George Bancroft: Handbook, 87; Digest, 171-182. Lect. 73. (1867-1900) Status of the Chinese and Japanese: treaty of 1868; treaty of 1880; acts of 1882, 1884, 1888, 1892; convention of 1894: Digest, 67, 144, 153. Lect. 74. (1865-1871) The Alabama question: Johnson-Clar- endon draft treaty (1868) ; treaty of Washington (1871) : C. C. Beaman, National and Private Ala- bama Claims; G. Bemis, American Neutrality; Arbitrations, I, 495-554; Digest, 1506, 402, 402a; C. F. Adams, Charles Francis Adams, ch. xix. Lect. 75. (1871-1890) Arbitration: Hudson Bay (1869); Geneva tribunal (1872); claims; San Juan (1872) ; fisheries (1875) ; French claims (1880) ; claims courts (1884-1886); Delagoa Bay (1890): Hand- book, 88; Contemporaries, IV, 173, 175; Caleb Gushing, Treaty of Washington ; Arbitrations, I, 222-236 (San Juan), 237-270 (Hudson Bay), 555- 560, 623-682 (Geneva), 683-702 (claims), 712- 753 (fisheries), II, 1133-1184 (French claims), 1865- 1899 (Delagoa), V, 4639-4685 (claims courts) ; W. F. Milton, San Juan Water Boundary. Lect. 76. (1865-1877) Projects of American extension: Hon- duras treaty (1864) ; Alaska treaty (1867) ; draft of St. Thomas treaty (1867) ; Nicaragua treaty (1867) ; San Domingo project (1871) ; and William H. 74 DIPLOMATIC LECTURES [ Seward : F. Bancroft, William H. Seward, II, ch. xlii; Digest, 61, 6 la. Lect. 77. (1868-1878) Cuban War (1868) : claims (1871) ; Vir- ginias, episode (1873); proposed intervention (1875) ; peace (1878): Contemporaries, IV, 176; J. H. La- tane, Diplomatic Relations of the United States and Spanish America, 135-174; J. M. Callahan, Cuba and International Relations, ch. xii ; Arbitrations, II, 1007-1069 ; Foundations, 39 ; Digest, 60. Lect. 78. (1877-1889) Isthmus question : French canal (1879) ; Evart's protest (1880); Blame's protest (1881); draft Nicaragua treaty (1884) ; failure of French company (1889) ; and Ferdinand de Lesseps : L. M. Keasbey, Nicaragua Canal and Monroe Doctrine, 124-158; J. B. Henderson, American Diplomatic Questions, 137-158; Digest, 145, 146, 150/, 292- 297; F. Snow, Treaties and Topics, 326-347; T. J. Lawrence, Essays, No. iii ; J. H. Latan6, Diplomatic Relations, ch. iv. Lect. 79. (1881-1893) Hegemony in Latin America: Chile-Peru (1881) ; Pan-American Congress (1890) ; Chilean epi- sode (1891-1892); and James G. Blaine : Contem- poraries, IV, 177; A. B. Hart, Practical Essays, No. v; Arbitrations, II, 1396-1447 (claims), 1469- 1484 (Chile), 1579-1592 (Ecuador), 1659-1724 (Venezuela), 1749-1853 (Hayti), 1909-2108 (United States as arbiter); Digest, 59 ; F. Snow, Treaties and Topics, 312-326; M. Romero, Mexico and the United States. Lect. 80. (1867-1889) Fishery questions: draft convention (1884); Bering Sea imbroglio: C. Isham, Fisheries, 58-84 ; F. Snow, Treaties and Topics, 445-481 ; Arbitrations, I, 763-790 ; J. B. Henderson, Ameri- 20i, 20j] WORLD POWER 75 can Diplomatic Questions, 3-29, 513-525; Digest, 305-308; S. B. Stanton, Behring Sea Contro- versy; C. B. Elliot, Northeastern Fisheries. 2oj. (1890-1901) United States as a World Power. PARALLEL READINGS ON THE PERIOD: American Academy of Political and Social Science, Foreign Policy. John W. Foster, Century of American Diplomacy, ch. xii. Foundations, 11, 12, 21, 27, 29, 41, 56. A. T. Mahan, Interest of America in Sea Power ; Lessons of the War with Spain; and Problem of Asia. WEEKLY PAPERS IN THE GROUP : No. 28. Control of seal catching : Handbook, 90. No. 29. Protectorate of Cuba: Handbook, 91. No. 30. Policy of the Open Door : Handbook, 92. Lect. 81. (1889-1895) Settlement of the Bering Sea contro- versy : judicial cases ; arbitration treaty ; arbitration of 1893 ; Alaska boundary; and James A. Bayard: Handbook, 90 ; Contemporaries, IV, 1 78 ; F. Snow, Treaties and Topics, 481-509; Arbitrations, I, 790-960 ; John B. Henderson, American Diplo- matic Questions, 29-64. Lect. 82. (1885-1900) Samoan question : tripartite treaty (1889); division treaty (1899) : John B. Henderson, American Diplomatic Questions, part iii (pp. 209- 288) ; Digest, 63 ; F. Snow, Treaties and Topics, 398-422. Lect. 83. (1885-1900) Hawaiian questions : revolution of 1892; annexation of 1898 ; and Grover Cleveland : E. J. 76 DIPLOMATIC LECTURES [ Carpenter, America in Hawaii, chs. x-xv ; Digest, 62 ; F. Snow, Treaties and Topics, 361-397. Lect. 84. (1894-1897) Venezuela episode : claims against Latin- American powers ; crisis of 1895 ; commission (1896) ; arbitration (1897) : draft permanent treaty of arbitration (1897); and Richard Olney : Contem- poraries, IV, 179; Arbitrations, I, 962-989 (draft treaty) ; J. B. Henderson, American Diplomatic Questions, 411-451; J. H. Latane, Diplomatic Rela- tions and Spanish America, ch. vi. Lect. 85. (1895-1899) The Spanish War: Cuban War (1895); declaration (1898) ; prizes ; conquests : Contempo- raries, IV, 180-184; Source-Book, 140-144; A. T. Mahan, Lessons of the War with Spain ; T. S. Woolsey, American Foreign Policy, 7-111. Lect. 86. (1898-1900) Negotiations for peace : protocol (1898) ; treaty of Paris (1899) ; Hague treaty of arbitra- tion ; and William McKinley : Handbook, 91; Contemporaries, IV, 185 ; F. W. Holls, Peace Conference at the Hague Arbitrations, V, 5058- 5067 (proposed arbitrations). Lect. 87. (1899-1902) Relations with Cuba: occupation; re- organization; protectorate; and Theodore Roosevelt. Lect. 88. (1898-1901) Colonies and colonial policy : military government ; civil government ; tariff ; Supreme Court cases (1901): Bibliography.- in A. P. C. Griffin, List of Books relating to Colonization ; Contem- poraries, IV, 186-191 ; M. Hill, Liberty Docu- ments, ch. xxiv ; Source-Book, 143 ; D. S. Jordan, Imperial Democracy, chs. i-iv, vii ; A. H. Howe, Insular Cases (House Exec. Docs., 56 Cong., 2 sess., No. 509). Lect. 89. (1899-1900) Eastern complications: Chinese im- 20j, 21] WORLD POWER 77 broglio ; Boxer rising ; intervention ; Open Door ; international agreements ; and John Hay : Hand- look, 92; Contemporaries, IV, 193, 194, 196; C. A. Conant, United States in the Orient ; P. S. Reinsch, World Politics ; W. E. Griffis, America in the East. Lect. 90. (1889-1901) Canal diplomacy : Nicaragua projects; commissions ; Hay-Pauncefote draft treaty (1900) ; report of commission; prospects: Contemporaries, IV, 195 ; A. T. Mahan, Interest of America in Sea Power; J. B. Henderson, American Diplomatic Questions, 159-208. 21. List of Lectures in Government 12. Abbreviated references in this list are as follows: Actual Government Albert Bushnell Hart, Actual Govern- ment as applied under American Conditions (N. Y., 1902). American Government B. A. Hinsdale, American Gov- ernment, National and State (rev. ed., Chicago, 1895). Commonwealth James Bryce, American Commonwealth (2 vols., rev. ed., N. Y., 1893-1895). Contemporaries Albert Bushnell Hart, American History told by Contemporaries (4 vols., N. Y., 1897-1901). Foundations Albert Bushnell Hart, The Foundations of American Foreign Policy (N. Y. , 1901). Guide Edward Channing and Albert Bushnell Hart, Guide to the Study of American History (Boston, 1896). Handbook this book (Cambridge, 1901). Liberty Documents Mabel Hill, Liberty Documents, with Contemporary Exposition and Critical Comments drawn from Various Writers (N. Y., 1901). Full titles of most of the books cited will be found in the Hand- book (use the index), or in Actual Government (use the index). 78 GOVERNMENT LECTURES [ 2ia. Fundamental Basis of American Government. PARALLEL READINGS ON THE GROUP : Bibliography, Actual Government, ch. i. Emile Boutmy, Studies in Constitutional Law, part ii. Commonwealth, II, parts iv-vi. Thomas M. Cooley, General Principles of Constitutional Law, ch. i. A. V. Dicey, Introduction to the Study of the Law of the Constitution. Charles William Eliot, American Contributions to Civiliza- tion, chs. i-vi. Edwin Lawrence Godkin, Problems of Modern Democracy, Nos. i, ii, vii, x. James K. Hosmer, A Short History of Anglo-Saxon Free- dom. Louis J. Jennings, Eighty Years of Republican Government, chs. i, ix, x. W. E. H. Lecky, Democracy and Liberty, I. 63-136. Liberty Documents, chs. i-xiv. Francis Lieber, On Civil Liberty and Self- Government. Elisha Mulford, The Nation. Alexis de Tocqueville, Democracy in America, I, chs. i-iv, xi, xii, xiv-xvii, II, passim. Christopher G. Tiedeman, The Unwritten Constitution of the United States. Westel Woodbury Willoughby, An Examination of the Nature of the State. WEEKLY PAPERS IN THE GROUP: No. 1. Growth of urban population : Handbook, 94. No. 2. Theory of the social compact : Handbook, 95. No. 3. Theory of religious liberty : Handbook, 96. Lect. 1. Aim and methods of the course, and materials : Hand- 21a] BASIS OF AMERICAN GOVERNMENT 79 book, 1-18, 22, 26, 93, 124, 138, 154; Guide, 30-34; Actual Government, Introduction. Lect. 2. Territorial basis of national life: physiography; na- tural resources ; principles of territorial subdivision : Guide, 21, 77, 78, 144; J. D. Whitney, The United States, I, and Suppl. ; N. S. Shaler, The United States, chs. i-iii; A. B. Hart, Formation of the Union, ch. i; J. H. Patton, Natural Resources of America. Lect. 3. The people within the United States : numbers ; dis- tribution; origin; races; color; sex; occupations: Handbook, 94; Guide, 145, 180, 204; E. C. Lunt, Key to the United States Census ; J. Strong, Our Country ; Contemporaries, III, 10-36, 151- 157, IV, 75-83, 203-209; C. D. Wright, Practical Sociology, chs. ii, iv, vii, viii; N. S. Shaler, Nature and Man in America ; Compendium of the Twelfth Census ; America's Race Problems (Amer. Acad. Pol. Sci., Annals, XVIII, 9-178). Lect. 4. American society as a basis of government : Common- wealth, II, chs. xci, xciii, cxiii-cxix; A. B. Hart, American Character in Politics ( Chautauquan, Nov., 1895) ; A. B. Hart, Puritan Politics (Orange, N. J., New England Society) ; A. B. Hart, Moral Stan- dards (Forum, Jan., 1895) ; M. M. Cohu, Introduc- tion to the Study of the Constitution ; A. Carnegie, Triumphant Democracy ; H. J. Ford, American Politics, chs. i-v. Lect. 5a. American theories of popular government : status of women ; equality ; the social compact ; democracy ; local self-government ; distribution of powers: Hand- book, 95; Guide, 156, 165, 183, 205; Com- monwealth, I, chs. xxvi-xxx, II, chs. cviii, cix; 80 GOVERNMENT LECTURES [ W. W. Willoughby, Nature of the State, ch. xiv; A. L. Lowell, Essays on Government, Nos. ii, iv ; A. C. McLaughlin, Social Compact (Amer. Hist. Rev., April, 1900) ; F. A. Cleveland, Growth of Democracy, chs. ii-iv; H. Holt, Talks on Civics; F. J. Goodnow, Politics and Administration, ch. i ; T. M. Cooley, Constitutional Law, chs. iii, vii. Lect. 5ft. American theories of Federal government: prece- dents ; two spheres ; division of powers ; ultimate authority : Commonwealth, I, chs. ii-iv, xxvi-xxx ; A. B. Hart, Introduction to the Study of Federal Government, 33-40 ; American Government, chs. xii-xv, xliv-xlvi ; W. W. Willoughby, Nature of the State, ch. x ; J. S. Landon, Constitutional History, chs. xvii, xviii. Lect. 6. Theory of education : public and private ; primary ; secondary ; college ; university ; technical : Brookings and Ringwalt, Briefs for Debate, Nos. liii, Ixviii; C. D. Wright, Practical Sociology, ch. xi; C. W. Eliot, Educational Reform; A. B. Hart, Studies in American Education ; Commonwealth, II, chs. cv> ex, cxi; American Government, ch. Ivi ; J. H. Crooker, Problems in American Society, ch. v ; W. T. Harris, in N. S. Shaler, The United States, II, ch. vi ; H. Von Hoist, Constitutional Law, 97. Lect. 7. Religious freedom : sects ; central system ; religious qualifications : Handbook, 96 ; C. D. Wright, Prac- tical Sociology, 38, 39 ; P. Schaff, Church and State (Ainer. Hist. Assoc., Papers, II, 391); J. H. Crooker, Problems in American Society, ch. vi; Commonwealth, II, chs. cvi, cvii; T. M. Cooley, Constitutional Limitations, ch. xiii. Lect. 8. Public opinion: the press; public meetings; personal 21a, 21 b] MEMBERSHIP IN THE COMMUNITY 81 influence ; mobs : Commonwealth, II, chs. Ixxvi- Ixxxvii, xcv; W. E. H. Lecky, Democracy and Liberty, I, ch. vi ; T. M. Cooley, Constitutional Limitations, ch. xii ; F. J. Goodnow, Politics and Administration, ch. ii; A. L. Lowell, Essays on Government, No. ii ; A. L. Lowell, Public Opinion and Popular Government (in preparation). Lect. 9. Historical development of American government, from 1606 to 1902 : R. Frothingham, Rise of the Republic ; F. N. Thorpe, History of the American People, G. S. Boutwell, Constitution; Common- wealth, I, chs. ii-iv, II, chs. xcvii-c ; American Gov- ernment, chs. i-xi; H. J. Ford, American Politics, chs. xxvi, xxviii. 2ib. Membership in the Community. PARALLEL READINGS ON THE GROUP : Bibliography, Actual Government, chs. ii, iii. American Government, chs. xlvii, xlviii. George S. Boutwell, Constitution of the United States, chs. x, xxii, xxiii, xliv, liii-lviii, Ixiii, Ixiv. Henry Brannon, A Treatise on the Fourteenth Amendment. John W. Burgess, Political Science and Comparative Con- stitutional Law, I, 174-252. Thomas M. Cooley, General Principles of Constitutional Law, ch. iv, 3, 14, chs. xii-xvi. H. Von Hoist, Constitutional Law, 72-78, 84-87. J. J. Lalor, Cyclopaedia of Political Science, articles on Cherokee Case, Civil Rights Bill, Dred Scott Case, Ex-Post Facto Laws, Habeas Corpus (U. S.), Jury (Trial), Personal Liberty Laws, Petition, Slavery. Liberty Documents. Alexis de Tocqueville, Democracy in America, I, ch. xviii. 6 82 GOVERNMENT LECTURES [ Christopher G. Tiedeman, The Umcritten Constitution of the United States, chs. vi, viii. Westel Wood bury Willoughby, The Eights and Duties of American Citizenship, part i. James Wilson, Works, II, ch. xii. WEEKLY PAPERS IN THE GROUP : No. 4. Citizenship by annexation : Handbook, 97. No. 5. Rights of Indians : Handbook, 98. Lect. 10. Doctrine of fundamental rights: colonial precedent; bills of rights ; Federal constitution ; " civil rights : " Guide, 146, 147; Handbook, 40; W. W. Willoughby, American Citizenship, chs. i-vii; J. Story, Commentaries, 301, 304, 1858-1868; Lib- erty Documents, chs. ii-vi, viii, ix, xi, xiii; T. M. Cooley, Constitutional Limitations, chs. ix, x. Lect. 11. Citizenship: birth; naturalization; annexation; aliens; " heimathlose " ; Chinese; loss of citizen- ship: Handbook, 74, 87, 97; G-. S. Boutwell, Constitution, ch. xliv. Lect. 12. Liberty: personal freedom ; movement; occupations; expression of opinions ; religion ; trial ; habeas corpus: Handbook, 40, 52, 55, 60, 87, 96, 98; Guide, 148, 186, 214; R. C. Kurd, Habeas Corpus ; J. C. Hurd, Law of Freedom and Bond- age ; Liberty Documents, chs. viii, xxi-xxiii ; Con- temporaries, IV, 124-129; American Government, chs. xlvii, xlviii; Adolphe de Chambrun, Droits et Libertes aux J&tats Unis / T. M. Cooley, Constitu- tional Limitations, chs. xi-xiii; G. K. Holmes, Peons of the South (Am. Acad. Pol. Sci., Annals, IV, 265-274). 21b,21c] WRITTEN CONSTITUTIONS 83 Lect. 13. Special status of inhabitants of dependencies : In- dians ; Alaskans; Filipinos: etc. : Handbook, 55, 91, 97, 98; Guide, 185, 196; Liberty Docu- ments, ch. xxiv; Contemporaries, IV, 186-191, 204. Lect. 14, Privileges and obligations of citizens and residents : protection ; obedience ; military service ; taxation ; status of citizens abroad: Handbook, 40, 74, 80, 87 ; W. W. Willoughby, American Citizenship, 26-29, 37-41 ; Liberty Documents, ch. xxiii. 2ic. Written Constitutions. PARALLEL READINGS ON THE GROUP: Bibliography, Actual Government, ch. iv. S. E. Baldwin, Modern Political Institutions, chs. ii, iii. Henry Campbell Black, Handbook of Constitutional Law, ch. iii. Charles Borgeaud, The Origin of Written Constitutions (Political Science Quarterly, VII, 613-632). John W. Burgess, Political Science and Comparative Con- stitutional Law, I, 142-154. Commonwealth, I, chs. xxii-xxxix. Thomas M. Cooley, Constitutional Limitations, chs. ii-iv, vii. Sidney George Fisher, Trial of the Constitution, ch. i. Franklin B. Hough, American Constitutions. John Alexander Jameson, A Treatise on Constitutional Conventions. J. J. Lator, Cyclopaedia of Political Science, articles on Amendment, Convention (Constitutional), Convention (of 1787). Liberty Documents, chs. vii, xi, xiii, xv, xvii. William C. Morey, Genesis of a Written Constitution, First State Constitutions (Amer. Acad. Pol. Sci., Annals, I, 529- 557, IV, 201-232). 84 GOVERNMENT LECTURES [ James Harvey Robinson, The Original and Derived Fea- tures of the United States Constitution. Christopher G. Tiedeman, The Unwritten Constitution of the United States, ch. xii. WEEKLY PAPER IN THE GROUP: No. 6. Limits on constitutional conventions : Handbook, Lect. 15. Principle of fundamental limitations: corporations; colonial charters : T. M. Cooley, Constitutional Limitations ; J. Story, Commentaries, 1331-1406, 1906-1909; Liberty Documents, chs. ii, vi, viii, ix, xiv, xix ; J. Schouler, Constitutional Studies, part ii, ch. vii ; G-. S. Boutwell, Constitution, chs. Ii, lii, lix; Commonwealth, I, App., pp. 687, 711; American Government, chs. xxvi, xxvii ; J. F. Dillon, Muni- cipal Corporations, I, ch. iv ; A. V. Dicey, Law of the Constitution, Introduction. Lect. 16. Constitutional conventions: Handbook, 36, 99; Guide, 154 ; J. A. Jameson, Constitutional Con- ventions ; Liberty Documents, ch. xvii; Common- wealth, I, App., pp. 667, 670; Contemporaries, III, 60-75 ; American Government, chs. vii-ix. Lect. 17. Amendment of constitutions through legislatures : national; state: C. Borgeaud, Adoption and Amend- ment of Constitutions, 3-25, 131-191 ; Common- wealth, I, chs. xxxii, xxxvii, xxxviii; American Government, chs. xliii, 1, 661 ; G. S. Boutwell, Constitution, chs. 1, lii-lxiv. Lect. 18&. Popular votes on constitutional changes: single amendments ; complete constitutions : C. Borgeaud, Adoption and Amendment of Constitutions, part 21c, 21d] POPULAR GOVERNMENT 85 iii, book i; F. A. Cleveland, Growth of Democ- racy, chs. v, ix ; E. P. Oberholzer, Referendum in America, chs. iii-vl ; Commonwealth, I, chs. xxxii, xxx vii. Lect. iSb. Interpretation of written constitutions: principles; status of courts ; unwritten usage : Commonwealth, I, chs. xxxiii, xxxv, xxxviii. 2id. Machinery of Popular Government. PARALLEL READINGS ON THE GROUP: Bibliography, Actual Government, chs. v-vii ; Brookings and Ringwalt, JZriefsfor Debate, Nos. i-xi. Gamaliel Bradford, The Lesson of Popular Government. Frederick A. Cleveland, Growth of Democracy in the United States, chs. x, xii. John R. Commons, Proportional Representation. Thomas M. Cooley, Constitutional Limitations, ch. xvii. Frederick W. Dallinger, Nominations for Elective Office. Henry Jones Ford, Rise and Growth of American Politics, chs. vii-xvii, xxiii-xxv. Edwin Lawrence Godkin, Problems of Modern Democracy, No. iv. Frank J. Goodnow, Politics and Administration. J. B. Harrison, Certain Dangerous Tendencies. Louis J. Jennings, Eighty Years of Republican Govern- ment, chs. vii, viii. W. E. H. Lecky, Democracy and Liberty, I, 223-304, II, 543-560. J. J. Lalor, Cyclopaedia of Political Science, articles on Assessments, Bill of Rights, Caucus (Congressional), Caucus System, Civil Service Reform, Disputed Elections, Gerry- mander, Instructions, Lobby, Nominating Conventions, Party 86 GOVERNMENT LECTURES [ Government, Returning Boards, Spoils System, Tammany Hall. M. Ostrogorski, Democracy and the Organization of Politi- cal Parties. Alexis de Tocqueville, Democracy in America, I, chs. x, xiii. WEEKLY PAPERS IN THE GROUP: No. 7. Question of limiting the suffrage: Handbook, 100. No. 8. Question of popular nomination machinery : Sand- book, 101. Lect. 19. The suffrage: history; conditions; exercise; woman suffrage; property qualifications: Handbook, 100; Contemporaries, III, 163, 164 ; American Gov- ernment, ch. liv; F. A. Cleveland, Growth of Democracy, ch. vi ; G. H. Haynes, Representation in State Legislatures ; R.Foster, Commentaries, 50- 59 ; M. D. Naar, Law of Suffrage and Elections. Lect. 20. The ballot : methods of voting ; counting votes \ minority and proportional voting ; corrupt influences : Brookings and Ringwalt, Briefs for Debate, No. xviii ; J. R. Commons, Proportional Representa- tion ; F. J. Stimson, Methods of Bribery ; Com- monwealth, II, chs. Ixvi, Ixvii, xcvi; A. B. Hart, Practical Essays, No. ii ; D. B. Eaton, Government of Municipalities, chs. ii, ix, App. Lect. 21. The referendum and initiative: E. P. Oberholzer, Referendum in America, chs. vii-xvi ; Common- wealth, I, ch. xxxix; F. A. Cleveland, Growth of Democracy, chs. vii-x. Lect. 22. Parties and party organization : history of parties: Guide, 160, 181, 201 ; J. Macy, Party History ,* A. D. Morse, What is a Party? (Political Science 21d,21e] COMMONWEALTHS 87 Quarterly, XI, 68-81) ; A. D. Morse, Political Par- ties (in preparation) ; Commonwealth, II, chs. liii- Ivi; Contemporaries, III, 83, IV, 197; H. C. Lodge, Historical and Political Essays, 198-213; H. J. Ford, American Politics, chs. vii, xxiii-xxv ; F. J. Goodnow, Politics and Administration, chs. ii, iii, ix. Lect. 23. Nominating machinery : conventions and caucuses : Handbook, 101 ; F. W. Dallinger, Nominations for Elective Office ; Commonwealth, II, chs. Ixix-lxxiii; G. W. Lawton, Caucus System; F. W. Whitridge, Caucus System; National Conference for Good City Government, Proceedings, 1901, pp. 187-207. Lect. 24. The machine, the ring, and the boss: rise; system; powers ; remedies : Commonwealth, II, chs. Ivii. Ix-lxiv, Ixviii, Ixxiv, Ixxv, Ixxxviii, Ixxxix ; G. Myers, Histori/ of Tammany Hall ; F. J. Goodnow, Politics and Administration, ch. viii; Contempo- raries, III, 88, IV, 202 ; T. Roosevelt, American Ideals, No. vi ; D. B. Eaton, Government of Muni- cipalities, chs. iv-vi. 2ie. Government of the Commonwealths. PARALLEL READINGS ON THE GROUP : Bibliography, Actual Government^ chs. viii-xi. S. E. Baldwin, Modern Political Institutions, chs. iii-ix, xi. William O. Bateman, Political and Constitutional Law, 186-193, 253-265, 283-285. Henry Campbell Black, Handbook of Constitutional Law, chs. xi-xiii. John W. Burgess, American Commonwealths (Political Science Quarterly, I, 9-35). Commonwealth, I, chs. xl-xlvi, App., p. 711. GOVERNMENT LECTURES [ Thomas M. Cooley, The General Principles of Constitu- tional Law, clis. x, xi. Lawrence B. Evans (editor), Handbooks of American Government. Monographs on government of individual States. F. J. Goodnow, Comparative Administrative Law, I, books ii, iii. Henry Hitchcock, American State Constitutions : A Study of their Growth. H. Von Hoist, Constitutional Law, 79-83, 89, 90. J. Franklin Jameson, An Introduction to the Study of the Constitutional and Political History of the States (Johns Hopkins University, Studies, IV, No. 5). J. J. Lalor, Cyclopaedia of Political Science, articles on Assembly, Judiciary (Elective), Nullification, Reconstruction, Secession, State Sovereignty, States (Constitutional and Legal Diversities). James Schouler, Constitutional Studies, 203-308. Francis Newton Thorpe, A Constitutional History of the American People. William F. Willoughby, State Activities and Politics (Amer. Hist. Assoc., Papers, V, 113). Woodrow Wilson, The State, 1087-1208. WEEKLY PAPERS IN THE GROUP: No. 9. How to secure good legislation : Handbook, 102. No. 10. Question of executive boards : Handbook, 103. Lect. 25. Colonial government as a precedent: Handbook, 33 ; Guide, 146, 147 ; Contemporaries, II, 45- 74; A. B. Hart, Source-Book, 48-51; E. B. Greene, Provincial Governor; J. S. Landon, Con- stitutional History, chs. i-iv ; F. N. Thorpe, Con- stitutional History of the American People, I, chs. 21 e] COMMONWEALTHS 89 i, ii; J. Schouler, Constitutional Studies, part i; W. Wilson, The State, 1042-1056; P. L. Kaye, Colonial Executive prior to the Restoration (Johns Hopkins University, Studies, XVIII, No. 5-6) ; H. L. Obgood, in Political Science Quarterly, II, 440, VI, 1, 201, XI, 259, 502, 694, XIV, 251, and in American Historical Review, II, 644, III, 31. Lect. 26. States in the Union: admission; privileges; duties; interstate obligations: Handbook, 34, 50, 61; D. F. Houston, Nullification; W. A. Dunning, Essays on the Civil War and Reconstruction, 63- 135, 304-352; Contemporaries, IV, 145-157; American Government, chs. xl-xlii, xlix ; Common- wealth, I, chs. ii, xxviii, xxxvi, xliv, xlv, xlvi ; G. S. Boutwell, Constitution, chs. xxix-xxxi, xliii, xlv, xlvi, xlix, Ix; J. Schouler, Constitutional Studies, part ii, ch. x ; J. Ordronaux, Constitutional Legislation, ch. iii ; J. K Tucker, Constitution, I, chs. v, vii; J. C. Hurd, Theory of Our National Existence; R. C. Hurd, Habeas Corpus, book iii; T. Farrar, Manual of the Constitution, chs. xxix, xxx ; L. J. Jennings, Eighty Years of Republican Government, ch. ii; G. H. Alden, Forming and Admitting New States (Amer. Acad. Pol. Sci., An- nals, XVIII, 469-479). Lect. 27. State legislatures and legislation: Handbook, 102 ; T. Roosevelt, Essays on Practical Politics, No. i, or American Ideals, No. v; M. Storey, A Year of State Legislation ; F. A. Cleveland, Growth of Democracy, chs. xiii, xiv ; Commonwealth, I, chs. xl, xliii; University of New York, State Library Bulletins Contemporaries, IV, 198 ; J. Ordro- naux, Constitutional Legislation, ch. x; S. N. Pat- 90 GOVERNMENT LECTURES [$ ten, Decay of State and Local Governments (Amer. Acad. Pol. Sci., Annals, I, 26-42). Lect. 28. The State governor: E. B. Greene, Provincial Governor ; F. J. Goodnow, Comparative Adminis- trative Law, I, 74-82. Lect. 29. The State executive : departments ; boards ; officials ; control: Handbook, 103; F. J. Goodnow, Com- parative Administrative Law, I, 102-106, 134-137, 146-161, II, 1-100; Commonwealth, I, ch. xli ; J. A. Fairlie, Centralization of Administration in New York State ; R. H. Whitten, Public Adminis- tration in Massachusetts. Lect. 30. The State judiciary : bar and bench ; relation to statutes; relation to appeal; courts; lynch law: T. M. Cooley and others, Constitutional History of the United States, ch. v ; A. L. Lowell, Essays on Government, No. iii ; Commonwealth, I, ch. xlii, II, chs. ci, oii ; S. E. Baldwin, Modern Political Institu- tions, ch. vii ; J. F. Dillon, Municipal Corporations, II, chs. xx-xxiii; A. de Tocqueville, Democracy in America, I, chs. vi, vii. 2if. Government of the Localities. PARALLEL READINGS ON THE GROUP: Bibliography, Actual Government, chs. xii-xiv ; Municipal Affairs, V, No. i (March, 1901). American Government, ch. Iv. Commonwealth, I, chs. xlviii-lii. Alfred R. Conkling, City Government in the United States. Thomas M. Cooley, The General Principles of Constitu- tional Law, ch. xvii. Thomas M. Cooley, Constitutional Limitations, ch. viii. 21e,21f] THE LOCALITIES 91 John F. Dillon, Commentaries on the Law of Municipal Corporations. Dorman B. Eaton, Government of Municipalities. John Archibald Fairlie, Municipal Administration. Frank J. Goodnpw, Comparative Administrative Law, I, 162-233. Frank J. Goodnow, Municipal Home Rule. Frank J. Goodnow, Municipal Problems. H. Von Hoist, Constitutional Law, 98-102. James K. Hosmer, Anglo-Saxon Freedom, ch. xvii. George E. Howard, An Introduction to the Local Constitu- tional History of the United States, I, 62-99, 135-238, 408- 470. Johns Hopkins University, Studies in Historical and Polit- ical Science, passim. National Conference for Good City Government, Proceedings. Alexis de Tocqueville, Democracy in America, I, ch. v. Delos F. Wilcox, The Study of City Government. Woodrow Wilson, The State, 1209-1259. WEEKLY PAPERS IN THE GROUP : No. 11. Improvement of county government: Handbook, 104. No. 12. Effect of foreigners on city government: Hand- book, 105. No. 13. Question of responsible mayoralty : Handbook, 106. Lect. 31. Colonial and early precedents : Guide, 147; Con- temporaries, II, 75-79; A. B. Hart, Source-Book, 52 ; E. Channing, Town and County Government ; A. B. Hart, Practical Essays, Nos. vi, vii; J. A. Fairlie, Borough Government ; J. A. Fairlie, Muni- 92 GOVERNMENT LECTURES [ cipal Colorations in the Colonies (Municipal Af- fairs, II, 341-381) ; F.A.Cleveland, Growth of De- mocracy, ch. iii; G. E. Howard, Local Constitutional History, I; W. Wilson, The State, 1033-1040. Lect. 32. Towns and townships ; and the town-meeting : A. B. Hart, in The Nation, May 11, 1893 ; E. Channiug, Town and County Government; Commonwealth, I, ch. xlviii. Lect. 33. Counties and the county system: Handbook, 104; Commonwealth, I, ch. xlix. Lect. 34. Mixed systems: township; county; county precinct; villages and boroughs ; school districts. Lect. 35. American cities: population; growth; problems: Handbook, 94, 105; C. D. Wright, Practical Sociology, chs. viii, ix ; A. B. Hart, Practical Essays, No. viii; G. E. Waring, in N. S. Shaler, The United States, II, ch. v ; D. F. Wilcox, Party Government in Cities (Political Science Quarterly, XIV, 681-698). Lect. 36. Legislative power in cities : charters ; councils ; boards; state legislatures: D. F. Wilcox, Municipal Government; A. R. Conkling, City Government; H. C. Black, Handbook of Constitutional Law, ch. xvii; National Conference for Good City Govern- ment, Proceedings, 1901, pp. 128-157. Lect. 37. Executive power in cities: mayors; city boards; State boards ; State supervision ; the police : Hand- book, 106 ; Brookings and Ringwalt, Briefs for Debate, No. xix. Lect. 38. Defects of city government : Commonwealth, I, chs. 1-lii ; N. Matthews, City Government of Bos- ton; B. S. Coler, Municipal Government (N. Y.); D. B. Eaton, Government of Municipalities. 21f,2lg] NATIONAL EXECUTIVE 93 Lect. 39. Franchises: docks; traction; question of municipal ownership: E. W. Bemis, Municipal Monopolies; J. F. Dillon, Municipal Corporations, II, chs. xv- xviii. Lect. 40. Remedies for misgovernment in American cities : Report of Tilden Commission, in Municipal Affairs, III, 434-454; Seth Low, Problem of Municipal Government / A. P. Wilder, Municipal Problem r - L. S. Rowe, Municipal Government as it should be (National Conference for Good City Govern- ment, Proceedings, 1894, pp. 111-122); N. Mat- thews, City Government of Boston, 174-185 ; J. A. Fairlie, Municipal Administration, ch. xx. 2ig. National Executive. PARALLEL READINGS ON THE GROUP : Bibliography, Actual Government, chs. xvii, xviii. American Government, chs. xxviii-xxxiii. George S. Boutwell, Constitution of the United States, chs. xxxii-xxxv, Ixi. John W. Burgess, Political Science and Comparative Con- stitutional Law, II, 216-263, 307-319. Commonwealth, I, chs. v-ix. Alfred Conkling, The Powers of the Executive Department. Thomas M. Cooley, The General Principles of Constitutional Law, ch. v. Henry Jones Ford, The Rise and Growth of American Politics, ch. xxii. Frank J. Goodnow, Comparative Administrative Law, I, 53- 82, 102-105, 127-138, 146-161, II, 29-46. Benjamin Harrison, This Country of Ours, chs. iv-xix. H. Von Hoist, Constitutional Law, 25, 26, 55, 59, 60. 94 GOVERNMENT LECTURES [ Louis J. Jennings, Eighty Tears of Republican Government, chs. iii, iv. J. J. Lalor, Cyclopedia of Political Science, articles on Con- firmation, Electoral College, Electoral Commission, Executive Impeachment, Removals, Resignations, Veto. Edward Campbell Mason, Veto Power. James D. Richardson, Messages and Papers of the Presidents. John Randolph Tucker, The Constitution of the United States, II, ch. xii. Woodrow Wilson, The State, 1323-1351. WEEKLY PAPERS IN THE GROUP: No. 14. Development of the Cabinet : Handbook, 107. No. 15. Needs of civil service reform : Handbook, 108. Lect. 41. Historical status of the presidency: Guide, 157; E. Stan wood, History of the Presidency ; A. L. Lowell, jEssays on Government, No. ii; Commonwealth, I, chs. v-vii; Contemporaries, III, 79, 106, 162; H. C. Lock wood, Abolition of the Presidency. Lect. 42. Choice of the President : Brookings and Ringwalt, Briefs for Debate, No. xii; A. B. Hart, Practical Essays, No. iii; Commonwealth, I, ch. viii; E. Stan- wood, History of the Presidency. Lect. 43. The Cabinet : Handbook, 107 ; Brookings and Ring- wait, Briefs for Debate, Nos. xv, xvi ; A. L. Lowell, Essays on Government, No. i; Commomvealth, I, ch. x; J. F. Jameson, Essays in Constitutional History, No. iii. Lect. 44. Executive organization and the civil service : ad- ministrative tribunals: Handbook, 108; L. M. Sal- mon, Appointing Power.; C. R. Fish, in Amer. Hist. Assoc., Report for 1899, I, 67; H. C. Lodge, His- 21g, 21h] CONGRESS 95 torical and Political Essays, 114-137; A. Conkling, Powers of the Executive Department. Lect. 45. Civil service reform : Guide, 181 ; Brookings and Ringwalt, Briefs for Debate, No. xvii; Contempo- raries, III, 81, 158, IV, 199; A. B. Hart, Practical Essays, No. iv ; T. Roosevelt, American Ideals, No. vii. 2ih. Congress. PARALLEL READINGS ON THE GROUP: Bibliography, Actual Government, chs. xv, xvi. American Government, chs. xvi-xxv. George S. Bontwell, Constitution of the United States, ch. vi. Commonwealth, I, chs. x-xxi. Thomas M. Cooley, The General Principles of Constitutional Law, chs. iii, iv, 15, 16. M. P. Follett, The Speaker of the House of Representatives. Henry Jones Ford, The Rise and Growth of American Politics, chs. xviii-xxi. Benjamin Harrison, This Country of Ours, chs. ii, iii. H. Von Hoist, Constitutional Law, 20-24, 28-34. Clara Hannah Kerr, The Origin and Development of the United States Senate. J. J. Lalor, Cyclopedia of Political Science, articles on Censures, Congress (U. S.), Congress (Powers), Congress (Sessions), House of Representatives, Riders, Salary Grab, Senate. W. E. H. Lecky, Democracy and Liberty, I, 137-167. A. Lawrence Lowell, Essays on Government. Thomas Hudson McKee, A Manual of Congressional Practice. John Randolph Tucker, The Constitution of the United States, I, 381-455. 96 GOVERNMENT LECTURES [ Woodrow Wilson, Congressional Government. Woodrow Wilson, The State, 1273-1305. WEEKLY PAPERS IN THE GROUP: No. 16. Choice of Senators by popular vote: Handbook, 101). No. 17. Defects of the committee system : Handbook, 110. No. 18. Influences on the legislation of Congress : Handbook, 111. Lect. 46. Members of Congress: appointment; choice; term; character : Handbook, 109 ; G. S. Boutwell, Consti- tution, ch. vi; J. W. Burgess, Political Science, IT, 41-58, 106-130. Lect. 47. Characteristics and special functions of the Senate and of the House of Representatives : C. H. Kerr, United States Senate ; Gomm.onwealth, I, chs. x-xiv. Lect. 48. The Speaker, Vice-President, and other officers : M. P. Follett, The Speaker, chs. ii, iii, x, xi; A. B. Hart, Practical Essays, No. i. Lect. 49. The committee system: Handbook, 110; L. G. McConachie, Congressional Committees ; W. Wilson, Congressional Government, chs. ii, iii; Commonwealth, I, chs. xiv, xv ; M. P. Follett, The Speaker, ch. viii. Lect. 50. Influences on Congress: constitutents ; the executive; the press ; private interest : E. C. Mason, Congres- sional Demands for Information (Amer. Hist. Assoc., Papers, V, 367) ; F. Snow, Defence of Congressional Government (Amer. Hist. Assoc., Papers, IV, 309). Lect. 51. Congress at work: sessions; secrecy; order; par- liamentary practice ; obstructions : Brookings and Ringwalt, Briefs for Debate, Nos. xxxii, xxxiii; H. C. Lodge, Historical and Political Essays, 169-197; A. B. Hart, Practical Essays, No. ix; Commonwealth, 21h. 21 i] NATIONAL JUDICIARY 97 I, chs. xvi-xix, App., pp. 673-681; M. P. Follett, The Speaker, chs. iv-vi; F. A. Cleveland, Growth of Democracy, ch. xiii. Lect. 52. Procedure of Congress and debate : A. B. Hart, Practical Essays, No. ix; M. P. Follett, The Speaker, chs. vii-ix ; B. P. Poore, Perley's Reminiscences. Lect. 53. The legislative output of Congress: amount of legislation ; relation to executive ; the veto : Hand- book, 111 ; E. C. Mason, Veto Power ; Commonwealth, I, chs. xx, xxi. 2ii. National Judiciary. PARALLEL READINGS ON THE GROUP: Bibliography, Actual Government, ch. xix; Handbook, 43- 45, 112, 113; Guide, 157, 175, 202. American Government, chs. xxxiv-xxxix. George S. Boutwell, Constitution of the United States, chs. xv, xxxvi-xlii. John W. Burgess, Political Science and Comparative Constitu- tional Law, II, 320-337. Hampton L. Carson, The Supreme Court. Commonwealth, I, chs. xxii-xxiv. Thomas M. Cooley, The General Principles of Constitutional Law, ch. vi. Thomas M. Cooley and others, Constitutional History of the United States. Benjamin Harrison, This Country of Ours, chs. xx, xxi. H. Von Hoist, Constitutional Law, 17-19, 43-46, 61-71. Judson S. Landon, The Constitutional History and Govern- ment of the United States, chs. xiii-xvi. James Bradley Thayer, John Marshall. John Randolph Tucker, The Constitution of the United States, I, ch. xiii. 7 98 GOVERNMENT LECTURES [ Westel W. Willoughby, The Supreme Court. Woodrow Wilson, The State, 1306-1322. WEEKLY PAPERS IN THE GROUP : No. 19. Administrative decisions : Handbook, 112. No. 20. Principles of declaring acts void : Handbook, 113. Lect. 54. United States judges and judicial organization : last Report of the Attorney General ; Commonwealth, I, ch. xxii ; J. F. Jameson, Essays in Constitutional History, No. i. Lect. 55. Judicial functions of the courts : cases ; writs ; special jurisdictions : T. M. Cooley, Constitutional Law, ch. vi ; Commonwealth, I, ch. xxiv. Lect. 56. Political functions of the courts: impeachments; relation to the States; constitutional law; adminis- trative jurisdiction: Guide, 175; Handbook, 43- 45, 112; Commonwealth, I, chs. xxiii, xxv. Lect. 57. Declaring statutes void : principles and instances : Handbook, 43-45, 113; C. M. Benneson, Power of the United States Courts over United States Statutes ; Commonwealth, I, ch. xxxiii ; B. Coxe, Judicial Power and Unconstitutional Legislation ; T. M. Cooley, Con- stitutional Limitations, ch. vii. 21 j. Territorial Functions in the United States. PARALLEL READINGS ON THE GROUP : Bibliography, Actual Government, chs. xx-xxii. American Government, chs. xxv, 409-412, xli. George S. Boutwell, Constitution of the United States, chs. xix, xlvii, xlviii. Foundations, 42-67. Franklin Henry Giddings, Democracy and Empire, chs. i, xvii, xviii. 21i, 21j] TERRITORIAL FUNCTIONS 99 Albert Bushnell Hart, Epoch Maps. B. A. Hinsdale, How to Study and Teach History. J. J. Lalor, Cyclopaedia of Political Science, articles on Annexation, Capital (National), Ordinance of 1787, Popular Sovereignty, Territorial Waters, Territories. Townsend MacCoun, Historical Atlas. Edward Campbell Mason, Veto Power, 45-51. Josiah Strong, Expansion under New World Conditions. WEEKLY PAPERS IN THE GROUP: No. 21. Status of territory conquered but not yet ceded: Handbook, 114. No. 22. Status of territory ceded but not yet organized: Handbook, 115. Lect. 58. Acquirement of territory: private landholding ; co- lonial landholding ; annexations ; methods ; status of occupied territory: Handbook, 91; Guide, 150, 168, 193, 194; B. A. Hinsdale, How to Study and Teach History; T. Roosevelt, Winning of the West; Foundations, ch. vi. Lect. 59. Boundaries: external; water boundaries; internal: H. Gannet, Boundaries of the United States and of the Several States ; B. A. Hinsdale, Bounding the Original United States; F. J. Turner, Western State Making (American Historical Review, I, 70, 251) ; Contempo- raries, III, 111, 112, 115. Lect. 60. Status of territories : conquests ; unorganized ; organized; protectorates: Handbook, 69, 75, 82, 91, 114, 115 ; Guide, 150, 168, 194; Max Farrand, Legislation for the Government of Territories ; American History Leaflets, Nos. 22, 32 ; Commonwealth, I, ch. xlvii ; Foundations, ch. v; C. C. Langdell and S. E. 100 GOVERNMENT LECTURES [ Baldwin, in Harvard Law Review, XII, 365-416 ; Sir G. C. Lewis, Government of Dependencies (Lucas* ed.), Introduction; Amer. Acad. Pol. Sci., Foreign Policy of the United States. Lect. 61. National public domain : seat of government ; public lands ; parks ; forests ; military reservations ; sites ; public works ; public buildings ; irrigation : Brookings and Ringwalt, Briefs for Debate, No. Iv ; S. Sato, History of the Land Question ; A. B. Hart, Practical Essays, No. x; last Report of the Commissioner of Public Lands ; J. B. Varnum, Seat of Government ; G. W. Knight, Land Grants for Education (Amer. Hist. Assoc. , Papers, I, 79-294); C. H. Haskins, Yazoo Land Companies (Amer. Hist. Assoc., Papers, V, 395-437); J. C. Welling, States' -Rights Conflict (Amer. Hist. Assoc., Papers, III, 411-432) ; C. Meri- wether, Washington City Government (Political Science Quarterly, XII, 407-419). Lect. 62. State and local public domain: eminent domain; forests ; school lands ; parks ; sites ; etc. : Reports of local Park Commissioners ; J. Lewis, Treatise on the Law of Eminent Domain; T. M. Cooley, Constitu- tional Limitations, ch. xv. Lect. 63. The Indians and Indian reservations : H. Welsh, Indian Question (New England Magazine, Oct., 1890) ; F. A. Walker, Indian Question ; last Report of Com- missioner of Indian Affairs. 2ik. Financial Functions in the United States. PARALLEL READINGS ON THE GROUP: Bibliography, Actual Government, chs. xxiii, xxiv ; Handbook, 38, 39, 116, 117 ; Guide, 151, 158, 174, 182-185, 195, 211 ; Charles J. Bullock, Essays on the Monetary History of the United 21j, 21k] FINANCIAL FUNCTIONS 101 States, 275-288 ; Bogart and Rawles, Trial Bibliography in the Financial History of the United States. Henry Carter Adams, The Science of Finance. George S. Bontwell, Constitution of the United States, chs. vii, viii, xxiv, xxv, xxix, xxxi. Commonwealth, I, chs. xvii, xlii. Thomas M. Cooley, The General Principles of Constitutional Law, ch. iv, 1. Winthrop More Daniels, The Elements of Public Finance. Davis R. Dewey, Financial History of the United States. Richard T. Ely, Taxation in American States and Cities. J. I. Clark Hare, American Constitutional Law, I, lects. xv xvii. II. Von Hoist, Constitutional Law, 35-37, 96. John Watts Kearney, Sketch of American Finances. J. J. Lalor, Cyclopedia of Political Science, articles on Cities, Debts, Deposits, Income Tax, Independent Treasury, Internal Revenue, Municipal Bonds, Refunding, Repudiation, United States Notes (two articles), United States Surplus, Whiskey Ring. Edward Campbell Mason, Veto Power, 18-20, 35, 52-81. National Conference for Good City Government, Proceedings, 1899, pp. 99-161, 1900, pp. 239-256. Alexander D. Noyes, Thirty Years of American Finance. John Randolph Tucker, The Constitution of the United States, I, 455-518. WEEKLY PAPERS IN THE GROUP: No. 23. Difficulties in assessing personal taxes : Handbook, 116. No. 24. Difficulties of tariff administration : Handbook, 117. Lect. 64. Sources of State and local revenue : land ; poll ; per- sonal ; license ; excise fees ; etc. : Brookings and 102 GOVERNMENT LECTURES [ Ringwalt, Briefs for Debate, Nos. xlv, xlvi ; E. R. A. Seligman, Essays in Taxation, and Shifting and Inci- dence of Taxation, part ii ; W. H. Jones, Federal Taxes and State Expenses ; M. West, Inheritance Tax ; D. F. Wilcox, City Government, 52-64 ; T. K. Urdahl, Fee System in the United States; R. T. Ely, Taxa- tion in American States and Cities ; T. M. Cooley, Constitutional Limitations, ch. xiv ; N. Matthews, Double Taxation of Mortgaged Real Estate ( Quar. Jour. ofEcon., IV, 339-345). Lect. 65. Apportionment of taxes : assessment ; collection : Handbook, 116; E. R. A. Seligman, Essays in Tax- ation ; V. Rosewater, Special Assessments ; Francis Walker, Double Taxation; J. F. Dillon, Municipal Corporations, II, ch. xix; T. M. Cooley, Law of Taxation; T. M. Cooley, Constitutional Limitations, ch. xiv. Lect. 66. The Federal tariff and its administration : Handbook^ 117; Guide, 158, 174, 183; Brookings and Ring- wait, Briefs for Debate, Nos. xxxvii-xliv; F. W. Taus- sig, Tariff History ; J. D. Goss, Tariff Administration ; W. Hill, Colonial Tariffs (Quar. Jour, of Econ., VII, 78-100) ; M. E. Kelley, Tariff Acts under the Confed- eration (Quar. Jour, of Econ., II, 473-481) ; W. Hill, First Stages of the Tariff Policy ; Contemporaries, III, 49, 50, 78, 130, IV, 164, 166 ; O. L. Elliott, Tariff Controversy. Lect. 67. Direct taxes ; excise and other internal revenue taxes, and their administration : F. C. Howe, Taxa- tion in the United States under the Internal Revenue System ; C. F. Dnnbar, Direct Tax, Income Tax (Quar. Jour, of Econ., Ill, 436-461, IX, 26-46); J. A. Hill, Civil War Income Tax (Quar. Jour, of 21k, 211] FINANCIAL AND COMMERCIAL 103 Econ., VIII, 416-452, 491-498); C. J. Bullock, Direct Taxes under the Constitution (Political Science Quarterly, XV, 217-239, 452-481); F. L. Olmstead, Tobacco Tax (Quar. Jour, of Econ., V, 193-219, 262). Lect. 68. Budgets ; appropriations ; expenditures : public ac- counts: C. J. Bullock, Finances of the United States, part ii, chs. ii, iii ; F. J. Goodnow, Comparative Administrative Law, II, 275-295 ; National Confer- ence for Good City Government, Proceedings, 1901, pp. 248-314; J. A. Fairlie, Municipal Administration, chs. xiii, xv, xvi; J. H. Hollander, Studies in State Taxation (Johns Hopkins University, Studies, XVIII, No. 1-4) ; R. Ogden, Rationale of Congressional Ex- travagance {Yale Review, VI, 37-49); D. Kinley, Independent Treasury ; H. C. Barmard, Oleomargarine Law (Political Science Quarterly, II, 545) ; H, C. Adams, Science of Finance, part i, book ii ; E. I. Renick and N. H. Thompson, National Expenditures (Political Science Quarterly, VI, 248, VII, 468). Lect. 69. State, local, and national debts : H. C. Adams, Public Debts; W. A. Scott, Repudiation of State Debts; J. A. Fairlie, Municipal Administration, ch. xiv. 2il. Commercial Functions in the United States. PARALLEL READINGS ON THE GROUP: Bibliography, Actual Government, ch. xxv; Handbook, 35, 38, 44, 45, 66, 67, 71, 76, 77, 92, 118, 119 ; Guide, 133, 153, 158, 170, 171, 174, 195. George S. Boutwell, Constitution of the United States, chs. ix, xi-xiv, xxi, xx vi, xxviii. Andrew Carnegie, Triumphant Democracy, chs. ix-xiii. Thomas M. Cooley, The General Principles of Constitutional Law, ch. iv, 2, 4-10. 104 GOVERNMENT LECTURES [ J. I. Clark Hare, Constitutional Law, I, lects. xxi-xxiii. J. J. Lalor, Cyclopaedia of Political Science, articles on Cor- porations (Law of), Embargo (U. S.), Emigration and Immi- gration, Internal Improvements. William Draper Lewis, Federal Power over Commerce. William Z. Ripley, American Transportation Problems (in preparation). H. Von Hoist, Constitutional Law, 38-42, 79. WEEKLY PAPERS IN THE GROUP : No. 25. City ownership of traction lines : Handbook, 118. No. 26. Limitation of immigration : Handbook, 119. Lect. 70. Commercial organization: individuals; corporate concerns ; corporations ; trusts ; syndicates ; interna- tional agencies ; Wall Street ; doctrine of contracts : Brookings and Ring wait, Briefs for Debate, No. li ; Commonwealth, II, ch. civ ; Contemporaries, IV, 162-167; H. C. Emery, Speculation on the Stock and Produce Exchanges; R. T. Ely, Monopolies and Trusts; J. B. Clark, Control of Trusts ; J. P. Davis, Nature of Corporations (Political Science Quarterly, XII, 273- 294); C. F. Adams, in N. S. Shaler, The United States, II, ch. iv ; J. W. Jenks, Trust Problem ; H. D. Lloyd, Wealth against Commonwealth ; W. M. Collier, The Trusts; C. F. Randolph. Federal Trust Legisla- tion (Political Science Quarterly, XII, 622-665) ; G. K. Holmes, State Control of Corporations (Political Science Quarterly, V, 411) ; American Academy of Political and Social Science, Corporations and Public Welfare. Lect. 71. Circulating media : coinage ; currency ; legal tenders ; commercial paper: Brookings and Ringwalt, Briefs for Debate, Nos. xxxiv, xxxv; last Report of the Secretary of the Treasury and last Report of the 211] COMMERCIAL 105 Register ; W. G-. Sumner, American Currency ; Con- temporaries, IV, 168-172; C. J. Bullock, Mone- tary History, 79-124; J. J. Knox, United States Notes; H. White, Money and Banking; D. K. Watson, History of American Coinage. Lect. 72. Banks : national ; State owned ; State chartered ; private; syndicates: Handbook, 38 ; Guide, 159 ; Brookings and Ringwalt, Briefs for Debate, No. xxxvi ; J. J. Knox, History of Banking ; last Report of the Comptroller of the Currency ; Contemporaries, III, 132; C. F. Dunbar, National Banking System (Quar. Jour, of Econ., XII, 1-26); C. A. Conant, History of Modern Banks of Issue, chs. xiii-xv ; W. Gr. Sumner, History of Banking in the United States; F. A. Walker, Political Economy (3d ed.), 433-462. Lect. 73. Land transportation : railroads; roads; State owned railroads ; intramural ; government regulation ; In- terstate Commerce Commission: Guide, 174, 175 ; Brookings and Ringwalt, Briefs for Debate, Nos. xlvii, lii ; W. Z. Ripley, Transportation (in preparation) ; last Report of the Interstate Commerce Commission; E. W. Bemis, Municipal Monopolies, ch. vii ; E. R. A. Seligman, Railway Tariff and the Interstate Commerce Law (Political Science Quarterly, II, 223-264, 369-413) ; Commomcealth, II, ch. ciii ; F. H. Dixon, State Railroad Control ; T. M. and C. H. Cooley, in N. S. Shaler, The United States, II, ch. ii ; A. T. Hadley, Railroad Transportation, chs. ii-vii ; Industrial Commission and Transportation, Report, IV, 1-32 ; J. P. Davis, Union Pacific Rail- way (Amer. Acad. Pol. Sci., Annals, VIII, 259-303). Lect. 74. Water transportation : canals; rivers; external navi- gation ; government regulations : last Report of the 106 GOVERNMENT LECTURES [ Commissioner of Navigation ; W. Z. Ripley, Trans- portation (in preparation) ; J. D. J. Kelley, Question of Ships; J. R. Soley, in N. S. Shaler, The United States, I, ch. x. Lect. 75. Encouragement of transportation : internal im- provements ; bounties ; subsidies ; public owner- ship : Handbook, 118; Guide, 167, 174, 179, 185, 195 ; Brookings and Riugwalt, Briefs for De- bate, Nos. xl, xli ; A. B. Hart, Practical Essays, No. x; last Report of the Chief of Engineers ; W. Z. Ripley, Transportation (in preparation) ; Contempo- raries, III, 131, 165-168; E. R. Johnson, River and Harbor Bills, Inland Waterways (Amer. Acad. PoL Sci., Annals, II, 782-812, SuppL, Sept., 1893) ; C. N. Morris, Internal Improvements in Ohio, 1825-1850 (Amer. Hist. Assoc., Papers, III, 351-380). Lect. 76. Transportation of intelligence : post office; telegraph; telephone : last Report of Postmaster General. Lect. 77. Movement of persons : immigration : Handbook, 119 ; Brookings and Ringwalt, Briefs for Debate, Nos. xxvi-xxviii ; R. Mayo-Smith, Emigration and Immi- gration ; last Report of Commissioner of Immigration. Lect. 78a. Conveniences of commerce : patents ; copyright ; weights and measures ; bankruptcy : J. Story, Com- mentaries, 1105-1115, 1122, 1151-1155; S. W. Dunscomb, Bankruptcy. Lect. 78b. Regulation of labor : Brookings and Ringwalt, Briefs for Debate, Nos. Ivii-lxv; C. D. Wright, Practical Sociology, part v ; C. D. Wright, Industrial Evolution ; C. B. Spahr, America's Working People ; D. A. Weils, Recent Economic Changes, chs. ix, x ; W. F. Wil- loughby, State Activities in Relation to Labor (Johns Hopkins University, Studies, XIX, No. 4-5). 211, 21m] FOREIGN AND MILITARY 107 2im. Foreign and Military Powers. PARALLEL READINGS ON THE GROUP : Bibliography, Actual Government, chs. xxvi, xxvii ; Hand- look, 12, 20, 71, 72, 81, 87, 89, 92; Guide, 153, 162, 168-173, 178, 189, 192-194, 212; Foundations, ch. viii. George S. Boutwell, Constitution of the United States, chs. xvi-xviii, xxx, xxxiv. Thomas M. Cooley, The General Principles of Constitutional Law, ch. iv, 12. H. Von Hoist, Constitutional Law, 47-50, 56-58. J. J. Lalor, Cyclopcedia of Political Science, articles on Army, Drafts, Military Commissions, Navy, Treaties (Fishery), Treaties (U. S.). John Bassett Moore, American Foreign Policy (in preparation). Eugene Schuyler, American Diplomacy and the Furtherance of Commerce. WEEKLY PAPERS IN THE GROUP: No. 27. Status of consuls : Handbook, 120. No. 28. The pension system: Handbook, 121. Lect. 79. Principles of American foreign policy : Handbook, 72, 89, 92 ; Commonwealth, II, chs. xciv, cxii; Con- temporaries, IV, 173-179, 192-196; Foundations. Lect. 80. Diplomatic representatives : correspondence and negotiations : Handbook, 20 ; last Report of the Secretary of State. Lect. 81. Treaty power: Handbook, 81, 120; F. Wbarton, Commentaries, 155-161, 383, 505, 506. Lect. 82. The army and militia in time of peace : education of officers ; recruiting ; pay ; discipline ; use : last Report of the Secretary of War ; T. A. Dodge, in N. S. 108 GOVERNMENT LECTURES [ Shaler, The United States, I, ch. xi ; L. D. Ingersoll, War Department. Lect. 83. The navy: education of officers; recruiting; pay; discipline ; use : E. S. Maclay, United States Navy ; last Report of the Secretary of the Navy ; T. Roose- velt, Strenuous Life, 167-188; T. Roosevelt, Amer- ican Ideals, No. xii. Lect 84. Declaring war and carrying on war: W. Whiting, War Powers under the Constitution; W. A. Dunning, JZssays on the Civil War and Reconstruction, 1-62. Lect. 85. Military and naval pensions : Handbook, 121 ; W. H. Glasson, Military Pension Legislation; E. H. Hall, Indignity to our Citizen Soldiers. 2in. General Welfare and Police Powers. PARALLEL READINGS ON THE GROUP : Bibliography, Actual Government, ch. xxix; Handbook, 38, 44, 122, 123; Boston Public Library, List of Books on Public Reform ; C. D. Wright, Practical Sociology, pp. ix-xvi. George S. Boutwell, Constitution of the United States, chs. xx. J. H. Crooker, Problems in American Society. John Archibald Fairlie, Municipal Administration, chs. viii- xii. J. J. Lalor, Cyclopaedia of Political Science, articles on Insur- rection, Mormons, Police Power of a State, Prohibition. Milo R. Maltbie, Municipal Functions (Municipal Affairs, II, 581-787). Delos F. Wilcox, The Study of City Government, 24-52, 93- 101. Carroll D. Wright, Outline of Practical Sociology, parts iii, iv, vi-viii. Charles Zueblin, American Municipal Progress. 21m, 21n] GENERAL WELFARE 109 WEEKLY PAPERS IN THE GROUP : No. 29. Best regulation of the liquor traffic : Handbook, 122. No. 30. Injunctions against rioters: Handbook, 123. Lect. 86. Public health and morals : quarantine ; practice of medicine ; boards of health 5 police ; hospitals ; police regulations : Brookings and Ringwalt, Briefs for Debate, Nos. Ivi, Ivii ; A. G. Warner, American Charities; W. H. Allen, National Board of Health (Amer. Acad. Pol. Sci., Annals, XV, 51-68). Lect. 87. Police protection ; crime and punishment ; liquor question : Brookings and Ringwalt, Briefs for Debate, Nos. Ixvi, Ixvii; F. H. Wines and J. Koren, Liquor Problem in its Legislative Aspects / J. Koren, Economic Aspects of the Liquor Problem ; S. E. Sparling, State Boards of Control (Amer. Acad. Pol. Sci., Annals, XVII, 74-91) ; F. H. Wines, Punishment and Refor- mation; T. Roosevelt, American Ideals, No. viii. Lect. 88. Public charity : care of the delinquent and defective ; poor relief : last Proceedings of the National Conference of Associated Charities and Correction ; J. H. Crooker, Problems in American Society, ch. ii ; J. A. Riis, Chil- dren of the Poor ; A. G. Warner, American Charities. Lect. 89. State industries and regulation of private occupa- tions : Handbook, 122 ; Brookings and Ringwalt, Brief s for Debate, Nos. xlvii-1; A. T. Hadley, Gov- ernment Administration of Industrial Enterprise {Yale Review, IV, 398-408). Lect. 90. Public order : obedience ; resistance ; riot ; insurrec- tion; ultimate defence of organized society: Hand- book, 123 ; Brookings and Ringwalt, Briefs for Debate, No. Ixxv; F. J. Goodnow, Comparative Ad- ministrative Law, II, 119-129; J. I. C. Hare, Con- stitutional Law, I, ch. xli. PAET IV PARALLEL READINGS 22. Requirement of Reading. In all the courses it is assumed that the student is doing regular and systematic reading; no one can expect in any other way to follow the lectures, to profit by the courses, or to pass the examinations. The careful reading of the text-books (Handbook, 9) is obligatory, and considerable parts of the essential reference books (Handbook, 10) will be necessary. Beyond, there is no requirement as to the manner in which the reading shall be done, and either of three ways will be accept- able : (1) The student may choose books at his discretion and read them according to his judgment (Handbook, 23) ; (2) he may choose groups out of the "general readings " given in the Guide, 56, and elsewhere (Handbook, 24) ; (3) if he desire to keep more closely within the limits of the course, he may read one or more references under each topic as it is taken up in the lectures (Handbook, 25). For the ordinary student it may be found most convenient to use the lists of general readings printed in the Guide, 56. It must be understood that the system lacks the advantage gained by search in books to find passages useful for immediate purposes. Such reading must, therefore, be supplemented by other parts of the work which give distinct training in the selection of material, especially the weekly papers and the special reports. Many students have the commendable habit of keeping ahead of the lectures with their reading, so that 110 [ 22-24] REQUIREMENT OF READING 111 they may have a basis of fact upon which to apply the lectures as they are delivered. But for the student who desires to keep a complete and consecutive abstract of his work it will probably be found most convenient to take notes on the lectures in a systematic form, leaving space to be filled in with an abstract from later collateral reading. The system of reading recommended by the instructor is a combination of the three methods described below : a few brief books should be read entire, the text-books, considerable parts of the Contemporaries, some of the American Statesmen series, and Edward Stanwood, History of the Presidency, will answer ; then the general readings may be used, and the student may go to special references in the Guide for important and difficul points. 23. Consecutive Readings. For the students who are willing to give most time to the course, perhaps the best method of reading is simply to follow out the standard books which most interest them, reading one after another, and comparing them with each other and with the lectures. The books recommended in the special collections (Handbook, 11-13) are the best for such a prin- ciple. The student should not fail to use contemporary narra- tives. In using this method, which will be most useful in GOVERNMENT 12, special attention should be given to the topics upon which the student finds himself most uncertain or ignorant when they are touched upon in the lectures. 24. General Readings. The difficulty of getting the certain use of a large number of books by considerable bodies of students is such that another method of keeping abreast of the courses has been devised, that, of "general readings." Several lectures are thrown 112 PARALLEL READINGS [ together into a period, and for each period is arranged a series of groups of associated books. For HISTORY 13 special provision has been made for this kind of work, by the preparation, in the Guide, 56, of a series of blocks of readings under each of the main topics of the course. Any one of these blocks is therefore sufficient on its topics, and the choice involves the use of a variety of books. Groups are roughly arranged in an order of preference, but there is very little difference in the value of the first half- dozen under each period. It will be well to use the books in the order in which they are printed in the groups, and so to choose them in successive periods as to bring into use a number of volumes. The system is adapted to the special collections (Handbook, 11-13). At the head of each group of lectures in the list for HISTORY 13 (Handbook, 19) will be found a few selected parallel readings. For HISTORY 14 no set of grouped readings has as yet been prepared, except in the List of Lectures (Handbook, 20). For GOVERNMENT 12 readings can be made up from the chapter bibliographies in A. B. Hart, Actual Government, and from the parallel readings in the List of Lectures (Handbook, 21). A different list of general readings in government was printed in A. B. Hart, Revised Suggestions, 33. 25. Topical Readings. Many students prefer to read specific references on the topics which come up in the lectures. To this end for HISTORY 13 there will be found arranged in the Guide, 144-214, a series of topics, most of which will be taken up in the lectures, although many points will there be discussed which are not directly included in any of these topics. An excellent way of following the course is after each lecture to read up one or more of the references under each topic which has been discussed. 24,25] GENERAL AND TOPICAL 113 The references in each section are loosely arranged in the order of preference, but all that are inserted - have a value. The topical readings are most valuable to students who can easily hold the thread of the narrative in their minds. A par- ticular advantage of the system is that it introduces the student to a large number of books. After many of the lectures in the list (Handbook, 19) will be found specific references. For HISTORY 14 some topical references have been provided in the List of Lectures (Handbook, 20), and further sugges- tions as to helpful materials will be made in the lectures. For GOVERNMENT 12 topical references will be found in the List of Lectures (Handbook, 21). PART V WEEKLY PAPERS 26. Purpose of the Exercise. The weekly papers are brief written answers to questions put upon the board, the exercise to come in the last fifteen minutes of the lecture hour. In the list of lectures intended respectively for HISTORY 13 (Handbook, 19), for HISTORY 14 (Handbook, 20), and for GOVERNMENT 12 (Handbook, 21), will be found stated in each group of lectures some general subjects connected with those lectures. Upon these subjects students are expected to read, so as to be prepared to form and express in writing, an opinion with reference to some minor point which might arise under the general subject. Thus, under the question of the methods of annexing territory to the United States, the paper might ask for a discussion of the question whether Cuba could be annexed by joint resolu- tion without the consent of the Cuban government ; under the general question of the Jay treaty might fairly come a ques- tion whether Jay could have got a better treaty ; under the general subject of implied powers might be asked the question whether the United States could constitutionally charter a government university. The purpose of the system is, therefore, to train students in applying what they have already learned to the formation of a judgment on a specific question which they have never before considered. This is believed to be one of the most important parts of the courses ; and a student who, for any reason, fails 114 26,27] PURPOSE OF WEEKLY PAPERS 115 to hand in or make up fourteen out of the fifteen papers re- quired in each half-year, may be considered not to have fur- nished the evidence that he is pursuing the course in a systematic manner. The general subjects under which questions are to be set in each course are enumerated in Handbook, 32-123, and under each will be found some specimen questions, to show the scope and extent of the work. All the papers will be read and corrected by a competent critic (instructor or assistant), and returned to the writer with written criticisms. The returned papers will be found in the appointed boxes, commonly at the second exercise after they are written. Stated conference hours will be held, at which students may discuss their paper work. To facilitate the handling of the papers, students will be expected to write them on the uniform blanks, furnished to the classes. 27. Preparation for the Papers. Since the weekly papers are the part of the course which calls for most individual thought and judgment, students are usually interested to come to them with suitable prepara- tion. Two things are necessary in order to write a good paper: the student must carry in his mind the general principles which he has acquired up to that point of the course ; and he must have read and thought intelligently on the subject under which the question is to be asked. For the latter purpose, a special set of references is provided on thirty general subjects in each of the three courses (Handbook, 32-123). Particular stress is laid upon the " sources," and especially the "cases." The use of such material is excellent prelimi- nary practice in the work of the lawyer, legislator, and publicist ; and the judgments formed upon sources are more likely to be 116 WEEKLY PAPERS [ original and pertinent. The reading done by way of prepara- tion for the weekly papers will be found a valuable part of the general preparation for the courses. On some questions the references to the HISTORY 13 ques- tions (Handbook, 32-61) will be found serviceable in ques- tions on government, and vice versa. 28. Special Directions for the Weekly Papers in History 13. Papers will regularly be called for in the last fifteen minutes of the Saturday exercise. Occasionally a paper will be post- poned, and two papers called for at the next Saturday exercise ; in that case they will take the place of the lecture. The ques- tions, several in number, so as to allow an option, will be dis- tributed in print. It will be noticed that the topics included in the list do not cover the whole field of constitutional law or government; they are selected on account of their connection with the nar- rative lectures and history. For instance, the paper on implied powers will come into the course just after an account of the creation of the first United States Bank; and the paper on secession after a discussion of the crisis of 1860-1861. In answering the constitutional questions students are allowed to have before them the text of the Constitution, and they are expected to refer to all the clauses of the Constitution which seem to them applicable to the specific question which they are discussing. For this purpose the text of the Constitu- tion in the American History Leaflets, No. 8, will be found convenient. They are expected, also, to apply whatever general principles they may have acquired in the course, as to the powers and limitations of the national and State governments. 27-31] SPECIAL DIRECTIONS 117 29. Special Directions for the Weekly Papers in History 14. In this advanced course attention can be given not only to questions of the application of international law, but also to questions relating to negotiations, and to some disputed points and issues. Saturday will be the normal paper day. 30. Special Directions for the Weekly Papers in Government 12. As the course is not one in constitutional law, but in the practice of government, the subjects for weekly papers will commonly be discussions of political and governmental methods. Saturday will be the regular paper day. 31. Materials for Weekly Papers in History 13. Thorough, intelligent, and systematic reading is necessary for success in the papers. To this end have been provided the sets of references on each of the thirty questions printed in Handbook, 32-61. In HISTORY 13 about one-fourth of the weekly papers are on other than constitutional questions ; and for such papers reference is made chiefly to the usual secondary books, and to easily accessible sources. Most of the books will be found in the "Government" alcove in the Reading Room of the Library ; or in the " HISTORY 13" reserved library; some of them in the Evans Library. Throughout the list below, the best books are marked with an asterisk (*). In preparing for the papers it is always well to read two contrasting views on contested questions. For the constitutional subjects more elaborate classified references will be provided. There are two points of view for every question of statecraft in United States history : first, the circumstances which surrounded and influenced an event; 118 WEEKLY PAPERS [ second, the underlying principles of government involved. Hence there are two groups of authorities of about equal importance, the narrative history and the treatise. 313. List of Historical Discussions. In HISTORY 13 the historical discussions serve as a connection between the narrative part of the course and the constitutional questions, especially those included in the weekly papers ; but such discussions need to be supplemented by study of the sources, in particular of cases. Lists of the principal secondary works on United States history will be found in the Guide, 20, 25 ; another list of works on American history in Theodore Clarke Smith, General Index to the American Statesmen Series. The following authors- are the most significant for their discussion of constitutional questions. They may all be found in the reserved books in United States history, and many of them are also in the Evan& Library. * Henry Adams, History of the United States of America during the Administrations of Jefferson and Madison (9 vols., N. Y., 1889-1891). Admirable for students of political conditions. John William Burgess, The Middle Period, 1817-1858 (N. Y., 1897). * George Ticknor Curtis, Constitutional History of the United States from their Declaration of Independence to the Close of their Civil War (2 vols., N. Y., 1889-1896). A learned and luminous work, very serviceable on many constitutional ques- tions. Vol. I. is a reprint of the author's two-volume History of the Constitution (N. Y., 1854-1858). Jefferson Davis, The Rise and Fall of the Confederate Gov- ernment (2 vols., N. Y., 1881). A defense of the right of secession. 31, 31a] HISTORICAL DISCUSSIONS 119 Richard Frothingham, The Rise of the Republic of the United States (5th ed., Boston, 1890). A careful account of the origin of our government. John Pancoast Gordy, A History of Political Parties in the United States (1 vol. published, to 1809, rev. ed., N. Y., 1900). Chiefly political and diplomatic. * Hermann Eduard Von Hoist, The Constitutional and Politi- cal History of the United States (1 vols. and an index vol., Chicago, 1877-1892). Very full discussions of many consti- tutional questions. * Judson Stuart Lanclon, The Constitutional History and Government of the United States (rev. ed., Boston, 1900). A good single volume in the development of American government. John Bach McMaster, A History of the People of the United States from the Revolution to the Civil War (5 vols. to 1900, N. Y., 1883-). Not much discussion of constitutional points. * James Ford Rhodes, History of the United States from the Compromise of 1850 (4 vols. published to 1899, N. Y., 1893-). Admirable for questions of slavery and the Civil War, though not professedly a constitutional book. James Schouler, History of the United States of America under the Constitution (6 vols., rev. ed., N. Y., 1895-1899). A political history, but with some discussion of constitutional questions. * Alexander Hamilton Stephens, A Constitutional View of the Late War between the States: its Causes, Character, Conduct, and Results (2 vols., Phila., 1868-1870). The best state- ment of the Southern view of secession and of the nature of the Union. Francis Newton Thorpe, The Constitutional History of the United States, 1765-1895 (3 vols., Chicago, 1901). One of 120 WEEKLY PAPERS [ three books by the same author on the general subject, all of which lack discrimination and accuracy. George Tucker, The History of the United States from their Colonization to the End of the Twenty-Sixth Congress, in 1841 (4 vols., Phila., 1856-1857). Written from the Southern standpoint; covers the period 1607-1841. 3ib. List of Select Constitutional Treatises. The principal treatises on constitutional law are the fol- lowing ; a more detailed list, including the older treatises, which are often important for historical questions, in Albert Bushnell Hart, Introduction to the Study of Federal Government (Boston, 1891), 469; elaborate bibliography in William E. Foster, References to the Constitution (N. Y., 1890) ; lists of authorities in many of the treatises ; critical comments on the treatises in J. N. Lamed, Literature of American History (N. Y., 1902). The treatises will be found distributed alphabetically in the alcove on " Government" in the College Reading Room. James DeWitt Andrews, American Law: a Treatise on the Jurisprudence, Constitution, and Law of the United States (Chi- cago, 1890). William O. Bateman, Political and Constitutional Law of the United States of America (St. Louis, 1876). * Henry Campbell Black, Handbook of American Constitutional Law (2d ed., St. Paul, 1897). George Sewall Boutwell, The Constitution of the United States at the End of the First Century (Boston, 1895). * James Bryce, The American Commonwealth (2 vols., rev. ed., N. Y., 1893-1895). John William Burgess, Political Science and Comparative Con- stitutional Law (2 vols., Boston, 1890-1891). P. C. Centz (pseudonym for Bernard J. Sage), The Republic Sla,3lb] CONSTITUTIONAL TREATISES 121 of Republics, or American Federal Liberty (4th ed., Boston, 1881). * Thomas Mclntyre Cooley, The General Principles of Constitutional Law in the United States of America (3d ed., McLaughlin's, Boston, 1898). * Thomas Mclntyre Cooley, A Treatise on the Constitutional Limitations which Rest upon the Legislative Power of the States of the American Union (6th. ed., Boston, 1890). William Alexander Duer, A Course of Lectures on the Consti- tutional Jurisprudence of the United States (Boston, 1856). * Roger Foster, Commentaries on the Constitution of the United States, Historical and Judicial ; with Observations upon the Ordi- nary Provisions of State Constitutions, and a Comparison with the Constitutions of Other Countries (1 vol. published, Boston, 1895). * Frank Johnson Goodnow, Comparative Administrative Law : An Analysis of the Administrative Systems, National and Local, of the United States, England, France, and Germany (2 vols., N. Y., 1893). * John Innes Clark Hare, American Constitutional Law (2 vols., Boston, 1889). Burke Aaron Hinsdale, The American Government, National and State (rev. ed., Chicago, 1895). * Hermann Eduard Von Hoist, The Constitutional Law of the United States of America (Chicago, 1887). John Codman Hurd, The Law of Freedom and Bondage in the United States (2 vols., Boston, 1858-1862). John Codman Hurd, The Theory of Our National Existence, as Shown by the Action of the Government of the United States since 1861 (Boston, 1881). John Codman Hurd, The Union State : A Letter to Our States- rights Friend (N. Y., 1890). * James Kent, Commentaries on American Law (4 vols., 1826- 1830, and many subsequent editions). 122 WEEKLY PAPERS [ John King, A Commentary on the Law and True Construction of the Federal Constitution (Cincinnati, 1871). John Joseph Lalor, Cyclopaedia of Political Science, Political Economy, and of the Political History of the United States. By the Best American and European Writers (3 vols., Chicago, 1881 1884). Francis Lieber, Contributions to Political Science, including Lec- tures on the Constitution of the United States and Other Papers (Phila., 1881). * Samuel Freeman Miller, Lectures on the Constitution of the United States (N. Y., 1891). John Ordronaux, Constitutional Legislation in the United States ; its Origin, and Application to the Relative Powers of Con- gress and of State Legislatures (Phila., 1891). Christopher Stuart Patterson, The United States and the States under the Constitution (Phila., 1888). * John Norton Pomeroy, An Introduction to the Constitutional Law of the United States (Boston, 1868, and subsequent editions). Carman Fitz Randolph, The Law and Policy of Annexation, with Special Reference to the Philippines ; together with Observa- tions on the Status of Cuba (N. Y., 1901). William Rawle, A View of the Constitution of the United States of America (Phila.. 1829). Henry Wade Rogers, editor, Constitutional History of the United States as seen in the Development of American Law (N. Y., 1889). James Schouler, Constitutional Studies, State and Federal (N. Y., 1897). Charles Carroll Soule, The Lawyer's Reference Manual of Law Books and Citations (Boston, 1883). * Joseph Story, Commentaries on the Constitution of the United States, with a Preliminary Review of the Constitutional History of the Colonies and States, before the Adoption of the Con- 31b, 31c] TREATISES 123 stitution (3 and 2 vols., 1833, and four later editions. Cooley's is the best, Boston, 1873). * Christopher Gustavus Tiedeman, The Unwritten Constitution of the United States: A Philosophical Inquiry into the Funda- mentals of American Constitutional Law (N. Y., 1890). Joel Tiffany, A Treatise in Government and Constitutional Law, being an Inquiry into the Source and Limitation of Governmental Authority, according to the American Theory (Albany, 1867). * John Randolph Tucker, The Constitution of the United States: A Critical Discussion of its Genesis, Development, and Interpreta- tion (Chicago, 1899). Timothy Walker, Introduction to American Law, Designed as a First Book for Students (9th ed., Boston, 1887). William B. Wedgwood, The Government and Laws of the United States, comprising a Complete and Comprehensive View of the Rise, Progress, and Present Organization of the State and National Governments (N. Y., 1866). A kind of popular law book, with forms of national and State government. Francis Wharton, Commentaries on Law, embracing Chapters on the Nature, the Source, and the History of Law ; on International Law, Public and Private ; and on Constitutional and Statutory Law (Phila,, 1884). 310. Reports of Judicial Cases. On all constitutional questions the most authoritative utter- ance is always the decisions of the courts, and especially of the Supreme Court of the United States. These decisions are printed in eight groups of publications, to be found in the Harvard Law Library, the State Library, and many other legal libraries. The official United States Supreme Court Reports and the collections of select cases are also reserved in the Reading Room of the Harvard College Library. 124 WEEKLY PAPERS [ (1) OFFICIAL REPORTS OF THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES. These official reports embody the most important material for forming a judgment on the nature of our government, the division of powers between nation and State, arid the distribu- tion of powers among the departments of government. They are published in several forms: (1) a series of consecutive reports, indicated down to 1882 by the name of the reporter (Dallas to Otto), since 1882 (1875) under the title United States Reports ; (2) in condensed reports compiled by various authors (Peters to Miller) ; (3) since 1882 in a series issued by the West Publishing Company of St. Paul, Minn. Any particular case included in the reports of the United States Supreme Court, District, Circuit, or Circuit Court of Appeals, and any case from other national courts or State courts, so far as included in the publications of the West Company, may be ordered by the name of the case (e.g., Ware v. Hylton) by forwarding twenty-five cents. In the lists of reports, the abbreviations are in the usual form of citations. " DALL." [1781-1800] Alexander James Dallas, Reports of Cases ruled and adjudged in the several Courts of the United States, and of Pennsylvania (4 vols., Phila., 1790-1807). "CRANCH" [1801-1815] William Cranch, Reports of Cases argued and adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States (9 vols., Washington and N. Y., 1804- 1817). " WHEAT." [1816-1827] Henry Wheaton, Reports of Cases argued and adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States (12 vols., Phila. and N. Y., 1816-1827). 44 PET." [1828-1843] Richard Peters, Jr., Reports of Cases 3lc] SUPREME COURT REPORTS 125 argued and adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States (17 vols., Phila. and Boston, 1828-1843). " How." [1843-1860] Benjamin Chew Howard, Reports of Cases argued and adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States (24 vols., Phila., Boston, and Washing- ton, 1843-1861). " BLACK" [1861-1862] Jeremiah Sullivan Black, Reports of Cases argued and determined in the Supreme Court of the United States (2 vols., Washington, 1862-1863). "WALL." [1863-1874] John William Wallace, Cases argued and adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States (23 vols., Washington, 1870-1876). "OTTO" [1875-1882] William Todd Otto, Cases argued and adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States (17 vols., Boston, 1876-1883). Also bears title United States Reports, Supreme Court, Vols. 91-107. "U. S." [1882-cont.] John C. Bancroft Davis, United States Reports : Cases adjudged in the Supreme Court (Vols. 108-, N. Y., 1884-cont.). (2) UNOFFICIAL REPRINTS AND CONDENSATIONS OF SUPREME COURT REPORTS. "PET. COND." [1791-1827] Richard Peters, Jr., Condensed Reports of Cases argued and adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States (6 vols., Phila., 1830-1834). " CURT. DEC." [1790-1854] Benjamin Bobbins Curtis, Reports of Decisions in the Supreme Court of the United States, with Notes, and a Digest (21 vols. and 1 vol. Digest, Boston, 1855-1856; several subsequent editions). "MiLL. DEC." [1855-1863] Samuel Freeman Miller, Reports of Decisions in the Supreme Court of the United States (4 vols., Washington, 1874-1875). Condensed re- ports in continuation of Curtis. 126 WEEKLY PAPERS [ "S. C. R." [1882-cont.] Supreme Court Reporter: Cases argued and determined in the United States Supreme Court (St. Paul, 1883-cont.). Issued at frequent intervals in preliminary fascicles, then in annual volumes. (3) OFFICIAL REPORTS OF INFERIOR JUDICIAL COURTS. No official reports of the district or circuit courts have been published, nor any systematic private reports till recently. The Court of Claims is included in Handbook, 3 Id, among the administrative tribunals. When the new Circuit Courts of Appeals were established in 1891, an official series was estab- lished which continued till 1899 as follows: U U. S. APP." [1891-1899] United States Courts of Appeals Reports : Cases adjudged in the United States Circuit Courts of Appeals (63 vols., N. Y., 1893-1899). (4) UNOFFICIAL REPORTS OF INFERIOR JUDICIAL COURTS. The lacunae in the official sources have been very efficiently filled by three systematic publications, which include all the decisions from district, circuit, and circuit appeals courts. There are similar publications of State cases arranged in geo- graphical groups. "FED. CAS." [1789-1880] The Federal Cases: Comprising Cases argued and determined in the Circuit and District Courts of the United States from the Earliest Times to the Beginning of the Federal Reporter (30 vols., and Digest, St. Paul, 1894-1898). Over 18,000 cases. 44 FED. REP." [1880-cont.] Federal Reporter: Cases argued and determined in the Circuit Courts of Appeals and Circuit and District Courts of the United States (109 vols. and Digest of 4 vols. to 1901, St. Paul, 1880-cont). 3lc] JUDICIAL REPORTS 127 *'C. C. A." [1891-cont.] United States Courts of Appeals Re- ports: Cases adjudged in the United States Circuit Courts of Appeals (45 vols. to 1901, St. Paul and Rochester, 1892-cont.). (5) COLLECTIONS OF CONSTITUTIONAL CASES. For the use of large classes will be found convenient the standard collections of constitutional cases (national and State), of which there are three. All include some State cases. Carl Evans Boyd, Cases on American Constitutional Law (Chicago, 1898). Briefest collection; chiefly from Thayer. Emlin McClain, A Selection of Cases on Constitutional Law (Boston, 1900). A convenient collection of more than 1,000 pages, arranged in the same order as T. M. Cooley, Constitu- tional Law. James Bradley Thayer, Cases in Constitutional Law, with Notes (2 vols., Cambridge, 1895). Best collection, admira- bly selected and edited. (6) OFFICIAL ADMINISTRATIVE DECISIONS. Besides the judicial tribunals there are several administra- tive bodies which decide cases, and record their decisions in official series. The most important are the following : " OPP. ATT. GEN." [1791-cont.] Official Opinions of the At- torneys General of the United States (22 vols. to 1900, Washington, 1852-cont.). "U. S. CT. CL." [1863-cont.] Cases decided in the Court oj Claims of the United States, with Abstracts of the De- crees of the Supreme Court in Appeal Cases (35 vols. to 1900, and Digest to 1875, Washington, 1867-cont.). " INTERS. COM. REP." [1887-cont.] Interstate Commerce Re- ports : Decisions of the Interstate Commerce Commis- 128 WEEKLY PAPERS [ sion of the United States (8 vols. to 1901, Rochester, 1887-cont.). " PAT. D." [1869-cont.] Decisions of the Commissioner of Pa- tents, and of the United States Courts in Patent and Trademark Cases (30 vols. to 1901, Washington, 1869-cont). 44 PEN. D." [1886-cont.] Decisions of the Department of the Interior in Appealed Pension and Bounty Land Claims; also a Table of Cases reported, cited, overruled, and modified, and of Statutes cited and construed (10 vols. to 1900, Washington, 1887-cont.) ; also a Digest of Decisions and Opinions relating to Pensions and Bounty Land (Washington, 1897). "LAND D." [1881-cont.] Decisions of the Department of the Interior and General Land Office in Cases relating to the Public Lands (30 vols. to 1901, Washington, 1887- cont.). (7) FEDERAL STATUTES AND TREATIES. United States, The Statutes at Large of the United States of America, . . . and Recent Treaties, Conventions, Executive Proc- lamations, and the Concurrent Resolutions of the Two Houses of Congress (31 vols. to 1901, Boston and Washington, 1850-cont.). United States, Revised Statutes of the United States, . . . em- bracing the Statutes of the United States, general and permanent in their Nature, in force on the First Day of December, one thousand eight hundred and seventy-three (Washington, 1878). United States, Supplement to the Revised Statutes of the United States, Vol. I, second edition, revised and continued, 1874 to 1891. . . . Embracing the Statutes, general and perma- nent in their Nature, passed after the Revised Statutes and in force at the end of the Fifty-First Congress [1891] (Washington, 1891). 31c] STATUTES AND DIGESTS 129 United States, Treaties and Conventions concluded between the United States of America and Other Powers (Washington, 1889). United States, Revised Statutes of the United States relating to the District of Columbia, and Post Roads, . . . together with the Public Treaties in Force on the First Day of December, 1873 (Washington, 1875). United States, Compilation of Treaties in Force. Prepared under Act of July 7, 1898 (Washington, 1899). (8) DIGESTS OF FEDERAL DECISIONS AND STATUTES. Of late years there has been extraordinary activity in analyz- ing, cataloguing, and indexing the vast materials included in the statutes, treaties, and judicial decisions. The most suitable of such aids are the following : [1789-1890] A. J. Baker, Annotated Constitution of the United States (Chicago, 1891). [1789-1870] Frederick Charles Brightly, A Digest of the De- cisions of the Federal Courts from the Organization of the Gov- ernment to the Present Time (2 vols., Phila., 1868-1870, 2d ed. of Vol. II. 1872). [1648-1896] Century Edition of the American Digest. A Complete Digest of All Reported American Cases from the Earliest Times to 1896 (27 vols. to 1901, St. Paul, 1897-cont.). (1789-1891) Henry DeForest Clarke, Handbook of all the Decisions of the Supreme Court of the United States (Rochester, 1892). [1789-1891] Henry Gold Danforth, A Digest of the United States Supreme Court Reports from the Organization of the Court (2 vols., N. Y., 1885-1891). [1789-1884] Robert Desty, Constitution of the United States (2d ed., San Francisco, 1887). 9 130 WEEKLY PAPERS [ [1789-1884] Jonathan Kendrick Kinney, A Digest of the De- cisions of the Supreme Court of the United States (2 vols., Bos- ton, 1886). [1789-1897] Lawyer's Co-operative Publishing Company, A Complete Indexed Digest of the United States Supreme Court Reports (4 vols., Rochester, 1894-1898). [1789-1880] Stewart Rapalje, A Digest of Federal Decisions and Statutes, . . . together with a Table of. Cases affirmed, re- versed, overruled, and otherwise criticised (Jersey City, 1880). [1789-1899] William Hepburn Russell and William Beverly Winslow, Syllabus Digest of all the Decisions of the Supreme Court of the United /States (4 vols., N. Y., 1900-). [1789-cont.] Walter Malins Rose, Notes on United States Reports. A Brief Chronicle Digest of all Points Determined in the Decisions of the Supreme Courts, with Notes showing the Influence [etc.'] of Each Case [etc.'] (12 vols., to 1901, San Fran- cisco, 1899-cont.). The most remarkable aid to the study of Federal cases, extremely useful from the historical point of view. 3id. Historical Sources. For the narrative questions, and often for the constitutional, recourse must be had to contemporary discussions and argu- ments. A bibliography and description of such materials may be found in Channing and Hart, Guide to the Study of American History, ' 27-35 ; in the introduction to each of the four volumes of American History told by Contemporaries / and in New England History Teachers' Association, Historical Sources in Schools. Among the most important sources are the Journals of Congress ; records of debates ; works of public men containing public speeches and state papers ; autobiographies and reminiscences ; President's messages ; statutes and treaties of the United States ; elaborate biographies containing docu- 3lc-32] HISTORICAL SOURCES 131 ments ; proceedings of learned societies. A list of indexes to government documents will be found in the Guide, 16e, and in American Statistical Association, Publications, yil, Nos. 49, 50 (March, June, 1900, p. 40). Several collections of useful sources have been brought together for the use of students. Of these may be mentioned : Jonathan Elliot, Debates on the Federal Constitution (5 vols., Washington, 1836-1845). Albert Bushnell Hart, American History told by Contem- poraries (4 vols., N. Y., 1897-1901). Albert Bushnell Hart, Source-Book of American History, with Practical Introductions (N. Y., 1899). Albert Bushnell Hart and Edward Channing, American History Leaflets (34 Nos. to 1902, N. Y., 189 2-). Alexander Johnston, American Orations: Studies in Ameri- can Political History (4 vols., re-edited by J. A. Woodburn, N. Y., 1896-1897). William MacDonald, Select Charters and Other Documents illustrative of American History, 1606-1775 (N. Y., 1899). William MacDonald, Select Documents illustrative of the History of the United States, 1776-1861 (N. Y., 1898). William MacDonald, Select Statutes and Other Documents illustrative of the History of the United States, 1861-1898 (N. Y.,1902). Edwin Doak Mead, Old South Leajlets (about 125 Nos., Boston, 1888-). James Daniel Richardson, A Compilation of the Messages and Papers of the Presidents, 1789-1897 (10 vols., Washington, 1896-1899). 32. Paper No. i. Use of Constitutional Authorities. This paper is intended to give to students the opportunity of making the acquaintance of the principal authorities de- 132 CONSTITUTIONAL PAPERS [ scribed in Handbook, 31. Students should seek familiarity with the treatises, best secondary writers, collections of cases, statutes, and- treaties, proceedings of the Federal Convention (Guide, 30), etc. BIBLIOGRAPHY. Students should be familiar with the prin- cipal aids to constitutional inquiry, especially the Handbook, Guide, and W. E. Foster, References to the Constitution. CONSTITUTIONAL DISCUSSIONS. It is necessary to know the plan and method of the principal treatises; the fundamental distinctions between private and public law; and the borders which separate constitutional law from other branches of the public law (Handbook, 316). ADDITIONAL CONSTITUTIONAL DISCUSSIONS. The student should make himself familiar also with the minor treatises. CASES. Carefully examine the three collections of cases (Thayer, Boyd, Evans), and try to learn the system of reporting and digesting cases (Handbook, 31c). HISTORICAL DISCUSSIONS. Examine the proposed secondary writers enumerated in Handbook, 31a, and see how far they seem to deal with constitutional questions. SOURCES. The principal official sources are listed above (Handbook, 31c, 31d). For constitutional documents: W. MacDonald, Select Documents and Select Statutes; Ameri- can History Leaflets; Old South Leaflets. For speeches on constitutional questions : American History Leaflets ; A. John- ston, American Orations ; debates of Congress. SPECIMEN QUESTIONS. What are the means of finding a Supreme Court case bearing on a particular subject? Which of the general histories seems to be most useful for constitu- tional discussion? Which of the treatises do you expect to make most use of during the year, and why? What is the best available material on the formation of the Constitution of the United States? 32,33J COLONIAL GOVERNMENT 133 33. Paper No. 2. English Control and Colonial Gov- ernment. BIBLIOGRAPHY. Handbook, 19a, 20&, 21a; Guide, part ii, and 147; W. E. Foster, References to the Constitution, 4-11. CONSTITUTIONAL DISCUSSIONS. J. Story, Commentaries, 159-178; J. R. Tucker, Constitution, 109, 111-121; R. Foster, Commentaries, I, 32; B. A. Hinsdale, American Gov- ernment, 33-40; W. O. Bateman, Political and Constitutional Law, 24-30; G. T. Curtis, Constitutional History, I, ch. i; H. Taylor, English Constitution, I, 15-48 ; P. S. Reinsch, Colonial Government ; H. L. Osgood, Classification of Colonial Govern- ments (Amer. Hist. Assoc., Annual Report for 1895, 617-627) ; H. L. Osgood, Proprietary Province (American Historical Re- view, II, 644, III, 31, 244); H. L. Osgood, The Corporation as a Form of Colonial Government (Political Science Quarterly, XI, 259, 502). ADDITIONAL CONSTITUTIONAL DISCUSSIONS. J. Schouler, Con- stitutional Studies, 9-29 ; S. G. Fisher, Evolution of the Con- stitution, chs. ii, v ; C. E. Stevens, Sources of the Constitution, ch. i; E. B. Greene, Provincial Governor ; W. C. Morey, Gene- sis of a Written Constitution (Amer. Acad. Pol. Sci., Annals, I, 5-29). For individual colonies, see Guide, part ii. CASES. G. Chalmers, Opinions of Eminent Lawyers, 206, 210, 223-258, 263-268, 332-348, 356, 467; J. B. Thayer, Cases (1587-1787), 1-55; A. McF. Davis, The Case of Frost v. Leighton (American Historical Review, II, 229-245). HISTORICAL DISCUSSIONS. W. PI H. Lecky, England, II, 1-10, III, 267-460; R. Frothingham, Rise of the Republic, 13-28 ; C. Borgeaud, Rise of Modern Democracy in Old and New England; C. Borgeaud, Adoption and Amendment of Constitutions, chs. i-iii ; H. L. Osgood, England and the Col- onies, and Political Ideas of the Puritans (Political Science Quarterly, II, 440-469, VI, 1-28, 201-231); J. A. Doyle, 134 CONSTITUTIONAL PAPERS [ English Colonies ; H. C. Lodge, English Colonies ; A. Johnston, Connecticut; E. H. Roberts, New York; E. L. Whitney, South Carolina ; N. .D. Mereness, Maryland as a Proprietary Province ; A. B. Hart, Practical Essays, Nos. vi, vii. SOURCES. A detailed list in Guide, 29. Charters of the colonies, in B. P. Poore, Charters and Constitutions ; many in Old South Leaflets (texts not very accurate) ; W. MacDon- ald, Select Charters. Contemporary discussions : Contem- poraries, II, 45-79; Source-Book, 48-52; A. Stokes, View of the Constitution of the British Colonies; E. Burke, European Settlements in America / J. Dummer, Defence of the New England Charters; M. Hill, Liberty Documents, chs. ii, vi, vii, xi. Documents in American History Leaflets, Nos. 5, 7, 14, 16, 19, 21. James Otis on Writs of Assistance: W. Tudor, James Otis; J. Quincy, Reports of Massachusetts Bay, 1762-1771. Franklin's examination, in B. Franklin, Works, (Sparks ed.) IV, 151, (Bigelow ed.) Ill, 407. - Works of contemporary statesmen, especially Penn, Hutchin- son, Franklin, and Washington. SPECIMEN QUESTIONS. Could a colony lay duties on im- ports from over the seas ? Could a colonial Governor be impeached for bad conduct in office ? Could England fix the conditions of colonial suffrage? Could England alter colonial boundaries ? 34. Paper No. 3. Is the Union Older than the States ? BIBLIOGRAPHY. Handbook, 196, 50,57,61; Guide, 142, 143. CONSTITUTIONAL DISCUSSIONS. J. Story, Commentaries, 206-217 ; R. Foster, Commentaries, I, 11-13 ; J. R. Tucker, Constitution, 104-166 ; J. N. Pomeroy, Constitutional Law, 25-34, 42, 43, 54-56; H. Von Hoist, United States, I, 33, 34] UNION AND STATES 135 1-64 ; A. H. Stephens, War between the States, I, 17-207 ; J. Davis, Confederate Government, I, 86-199. ADDITIONAL CONSTITUTIONAL DISCUSSIONS. J. D. Andrews, American Law, 209 ; H. C. Black, Constitutional Law, 22-24 ; J. Schouler, Constitutional Studies, 81-83 ; T. M. Cooley, Con- stitutional Law, 8-11. CASES. Penhallow v. Doane (1795): 3 Dallas, 54, 80-82, 90-96, 109-112; 1 Curtis, 84, 86-88, 97-104, 116-120.- Ware v. Hylton (1795): 3 Dallas, 199; 1 Curtis, 164. Worcester v. Georgia (1832): 6 Peters, 515; 10 Curtis, 214; J. B. Thayer, Cases, 583. Mcllvaine v. Coxe (1808) : 4 Cranch, 209; 2 Curtis, 74. Texas v. White (1868): 7 Wallace, 700; J. B. Thayer, Cases, 302; C. E. Boyd, Cases, 552. White v. Hart (1871): 13 Wallace, 646; J. B. Thayer, Cases, 259. Keith v. Clark (1878) : 97 U. S., 454. HISTORICAL DISCUSSIONS. R. Frothingham, Rise of the Re- public, 358-377, 399-402,417-429; G. T. Curtis, History of the Constitution, I, 39, 40 (Constitutional History, I, 6-26) ; J. C. Ropes, Story of the Civil War, I, ch. i ; J. J. Lalor, Cyclopcedia, III, 993. SOURCES. Declaration of Independence, in American His- tory Leaflets, No. 11; plans of union, in American History Leaflets, No. 14 ; drafts of constitutions, in American History Leaflets, No. *2Q. Contemporaries, II, 184-190; M. Hill, Liberty Documents, ch. xiv. John C. Calhoun's theory, in A Disquisition on Government (Works, I, 1), and A Discourse on the Constitution and Government of the United States (Works, I, 111-147). Abraham Lincoln's theory: A. Lincoln, Com- plete Works, II, 61-66; Senate Executive Documents, 37 Cong., 1 sess. (1861), No. 1, pp. 11-17; J. D. Richardson, Messages, VI, 20. Virginia and Kentucky Resolutions : American History Leaflets, No. 15; J. Elliot, Debates, IV, 528, 529, 532-548 ; W. MacDonald, Select Documents, Nos. 21-23 ; T. 136 CONSTITUTIONAL PAPERS [ Jefferson, Writings (Washington ed.), IX, 496-500. J. Mon- roe, Message of May 4, 1822 : Statesman's Manual, I, 492- 500; Annals of Congress, 17 Cong., 1. sess. (1822), pp. 1809- 1818; J. D. Richardson, Messages, II, 144-150. SPECIMEN QUESTIONS. Were the people of the colonies bound by the ordinances of Congress before July 4, 1776? Were the people of the States bound by the ordinances of Con- gress after July 4, 1776? Did the United States dissolve the relations between England and the colonies ? Has any State ever had a status outside the Union ? 35. Paper No. 4. Powers and Functions of the Confederation. BIBLIOGRAPHY. Handbook, 196, 20d, 69; Guide, 149, 186. CONSTITUTIONAL DISCUSSIONS. J. Story, Commentaries, 229-271; T. M. Cooley, Constitutional Law, 11-15; J. J. Lalor, Cyclopaedia, I, 574-576 ; B. A. Hinsdale, American Government, 122-135; J. I. C. Hare, Constitutional Law, I, 15-18; J. N. Pomeroy, Constitutional Law, 65-73; H. Von Hoist, Constitutional Law, 2 ; H. Flanders, Exposition of the Constitution, 42-44 ; R. Foster, Commentaries, I, 3 ; J. R. Tucker, Constitution, 133-137; H. C. Black, Con- stitutional Law, 37-40; J. Schouler, Constitutional Studies, 84-95. CASES. Penhallow v. Doane (1795) : 3 Dallas, 54 ; 1 Curtis, 84. Ware v. Hylton (1795) : 3 Dallas, 199, 235-237; 1 Cur- tis, 164, 179-181. Hylton v. United States (1796) : 3 Dallas, 171, 178; 1 Curtis, 150, 156. Hopkirk v. Bell (1806): 3 Cranch, 454 ; 1 Curtis, 640. HISTORICAL DISCUSSIONS. M. Hill, Liberty Documents, ch. xv ; G. T. Curtis, History of the Constitution, I, 142-151, 231- 240, 252-259 (Constitutional History, chs. vi, viii, ix) ; H. Von 34-36] THE CONFEDERATION 137 Hoist, United States, I, 22-30, 36-45; J. Winsor, Narrative and Critical History, VII, ch. iii ; R. Frothingham, Rise of the Republic, 569-579 ; R. Hildreth, United States, III, 395-403 ; T. Pitkin, United States, II, 11-16; J. Fiske, Critical Period, 90-101 ; J. Marshall, Life of Washington, V, 83 ; H. Sherman, Governmental History, 862-866, 880-886; A. Carlier, La Republique Americaine, I, 526-532. SOURCES. Articles of Confederation (verbatim text in Amer- ican History Leaflets, No. 20), Arts. II, VI, IX, XII, XIII; proposals to amend in American History Leaflets, No. 28. Journals of Congress; Secret Journals of Congress; resolu- tions of Congress, in J. B. Thayer, Cases, 81-83 ; Madison's notes: H. D. Gilpin, Madison Papers, I, 1-467; J. Elliot, Debates, V, 1-105 (proceedings of Congress to remedy defects in the Confederation, in I, 92-116). Source-Book, 64-69; Contemporaries, III, 37-41, 54-59. J. Madison, Writ- ings, I, 320-328; Pelatiah Webster, Dissertation on the Politi- cal Union ; Noah Webster, Sketches of American Policy ; G. Washington, Works (Sparks ed.), IX, 501, 510, 521; B. Franklin, Works (Bigelow ed.), X, 1, 2; The Federalist, Nos. 15-22 (Ford ed., 131-143). SPECIMEN QUESTIONS. Had the Confederation a constitu- tional right to pass the Northwest Ordinance? Could Con- gress constitutionally compel any State to furnish troops for an offensive war? Could Congress constitutionally charter the Bank of North America ? Could Congress constitutionally have aided Massachusetts to put down Shays' Rebellion ? 36. Paper No. 5. Making and Amendment of Con- stitutions. BIBLIOGRAPHY. Handbook, 19c, 21c, 99; Guide, 154-156, CONSTITUTIONAL DISCUSSIONS. J. A. Jameson, Constitu- 138 CONSTITUTIONAL PAPERS [ tional Conventions; C. Borgeaud, Adoption and Amendment of Constitutions, parts i, iii ; J. Story, Commentaries, 272- 281, 1825-1831 ; J. N. Pomeroy, Constitutional Law, Intro- duction, 109-116; T. M. Cooley, Constitutional Law, (ed. 1880) 199-204, (ed. 1891) 207-212, (ed. 1898) 218-223; J. R. Tucker, Constitution, 322-324; G. T. Curtis, Constitutional History, II, ch. vi; H. C. Black, Constitutional Law, 40-50. CASES. J. B. Thayer, Cases, 207-213. Rollings worth . Virginia (1798) : 3 Dallas, 378; 1 Curtis. 266. Opinions of the Justices (1833, 1883), in J. B. Thayer, Cases, 221-227. - Wells r. Bain (1874): 75 Pa. St. 39; J. B. Thayer, Cases, 228. Wood's Appeal (1874): 75 Pa. St. 59; J. B. Thayer, Cases, 239. Sproule v. Fredericks (1892): 69 Miss. 898; J. B. Thayer, Cases, 250. HISTORICAL DISCUSSIONS. M. Hill, Liberty Documents, ch. xvii; H. Von Hoist, United States, I, 62, 63, 267, 460, IV, 335, VII, 336, 430, 442-445 ; R. Hildreth, United States, IV, 112; J. J. Lalor, Cyclopaedia, I, 607, 608; B. A. Hinsdale, American Government, chs. vii-x; R. Foster, Commentaries, I, 8-10; S. G. Fisher, Evolution of the Constitution, 176- 181. For the history of the fifteen amendments to the Fed- eral Constitution see the general histories (Guide, 20). SOURCES. Articles of Confederation (verbatim text in American History Leaflets, No. 20), Arts. V, XIII; Constitu- tion of the United States, Art. I, Sect. 7, 3 ; Sect. 9, 1 ; Art. IV, Sect. 3, 1 ; Art. V; Art. VII; Signatures. Debates in the Federal Convention : Journal of the Federal Convention ; J. Elliot, Debates ; H. D. Gilpin, Madison Papers. Contemporaries, III, 60-75; Source-Book, 68, 69; The Federalist (Ford ed.), 291, 292, 585-587. SPECIMEN QUESTIONS. Was Rhode Island bound to join the Union after 1787? Can the State legislatures by unani- mous agreement put a constitutional amendment into force 36,37] CONSTITUTION MAKING 139 which has not yet been submitted by Congress or by a conven- tion? May Congress by the act calling a convention limit the subjects on which it may submit amendments? May a State withdraw a ratification before the required three-fourths have been obtained? 37. Paper No. 6. Doctrine of Separation of Powers. BIBLIOGRAPHY. Handbook, 19c, 21a, 112, 113, 120; Guide, 157, 162, 167, 208. CONSTITUTIONAL DISCUSSIONS. J. Story, Commentaries, 532-541, 881-893, 1560-1563; J. N. Pomeroy, Constitutional Laic, 107-119, 174-179, 632; J. D. Andrews, American Law, ch. xii; H. Von Hoist, Constitutional Law, 33, 34, 46, 55, 58, 59; T. M. Cooley, Constitutional Law, (ed. 1880) 156-163, (ed. 1891) 163-169, (ed. 1898) 175-181 ; R. Foster, Commentaries, I, 39, 40, 42, 86, 88-96, 111 ; J. R. Tucker, Constitution, 65-67, 188, 213, 214; H. C. Black, Con- stitutional Law, 72-88, 95-99, 106-110, 114, 115. ADDITIONAL CONSTITUTIONAL DISCUSSIONS. E. C. Mason, Veto Power, 18-24, 31-36, 99-105, 121-123, 230; E. C. Mason, Congressional Demands upon the Executive (Amer. Hist. Assoc., Papers, V, 367-375); J. Bryce, American Com- momvealth, I, chs. xxi, xxv; J. J. Lalor, Cyclopaedia, II, 132-136, 480-482, III, 1064-1066 ; W. Rawle, View of the Constitution, chs. v, xvi ; A. B. Hart, Practical Essays, No. i; A. L. Lowell, Essays on Government, 97-101. CASES. Marbury v. Madison (1803): 1 Cranch, 137; 1 Curtis, 368; J. B. Thayer, Cases, 107 ; C. E. Boyd, Cases, 17; E. McClain, Cases, 815. Kendall v. United States (1838): 12 Peters, 524; 12 Curtis, 834. Luther v. Borden (1848): 7 Howard, 1; 17 Curtis, 1 ; C. E. Boyd, Cases, 647; E. McClain, Cases, 595; J. B. Thayer, Cases, 191. Mississippi 140 CONSTITUTIONAL PAPERS [ v. Johnson (1866) : 4 Wallace, 475; J. B. Tkayer, Cases, 196; C. E. Boyd, Cases, 652; E. McClain, Cases, 102. Georgia v. Stanton (1867): 6 Wallace, 50; J. B. Thayer, Cases, 201. Kilbourn v. Thompson (1880): 103 U. S., 168. United States v. Black (1888): 128 U. S., 40. United States r. Schurz (1880): 102 U. S., 378. United States r. Elaine (1890): 139 U. S., 306. Field v. Clark (1891): 143 U. S., 649 ; E. McClain, Cases, 95. HISTORICAL DISCUSSIONS. This question came up in debates on the President's removing power (Guide, 157) ; on the Jay treaty (Guide, 162); on the Marbury decision (Guide, 167); on Jackson's removal of the deposits (Guide, 185); on the Dred Scott decision ( Guide, 204) ; and on Lincoln's war power (Guide, 208). See also J. B. Thayer, Cases, 354n; S. G. Fisher, Evolution of the Constitution, 109-116, 161-167; W. M. Meigs, Growth of the Constitution, 115-122, 229-231. SOURCES. Constitution of the United States, Art. I, Sect. 1; Sect. 3, 6; Sect. 6, 2; Sect. 7, 2, 3 ; Sect. 8, 18; Art. II, Sect. 1, 1; Sect. 2, 1, 2 ; Sects. 3, 4; Art. Ill, Sect. 1; Sect. 3, 2. The Federalist (Ford ed.), 48, 319-334, 458, 489; Contemporaries, III, 54; Senate Reports, 46 Cong., 3 sess. (1881), No. 837 ; J. Adams, Defence of the Constitution; Montesquieu, Esprit des Lois; Blackstone, Commentaries. SPECIMEN QUESTIONS. Could either House be compelled by Act of Congress to admit members of the Cabinet to a share in debate? May the House require the President to submit papers to it? Can the Federal courts compel a member of Congress to vote on a pending measure? Is the President bound by a decision of the Supreme Court? 37,38] IMPLIED POWERS 141 38. Paper No. 7. Implied Powers and the Gen- eral Welfare. BIBLIOGRAPHY. Handbook, 19c, 21c, 2ln, 39, 45; GtoVfe, 159! CONSTITUTIONAL DISCUSSIONS. J. Story, Commentaries, 420, 430-434, 497-506, 907-930, 1231-1266; J. N. Pomeroy, Constitutional Law, 259-269; T. M. Cooley, Constitu- tional Law, (ed. 1880) 91-99, (ed. 1891) 94-102, (ed. 1898) 105-113; H. Von Hoist, Constitutional Law, 16, 36; S. F. Miller, Constitution, 128-132, 135-144, 227-231 ; J. I. C. Hare, Constitutional Law, I, 94-118; J. Tiffany, Treatise in Government, 337-340; J. R. Tucker, Constitution, 179- 183, 222-234, 248, 249, 294; H. C. Black, Constitutional Law, 179-182, 235-243, 385-391 ; J. D. Andrews, American Law, ch. xiv. ADDITIONAL CONSTITUTIONAL DISCUSSIONS. J. Kent, Com- mentaries, I, 248-255, 267 ; B. A. Hinsdale, American Government, 307; W. O. Bateman, Political and Constitu- tional Law, 205, 206; R. Foster, Commentaries, 24. CASES. United States v. Fisher (1805): 2 Cranch, 358; 1 Curtis, 496. Fletcher v. Peck (1810): 6 Cranch, 87; 2 Curtis, 328; C. E. Boyd, Cases, 395. Martin v. Hunter's Lessee (1816) : 1 Wheaton, 304; 3 Curtis, 562 ; J. B. Thayer, Cases, 123-132; C. E. Boyd, Cases, 616; E. McClain, Cases, 746; J. Marshall, Writings, 525-555. McCulloch v. Mary- land (1819) : 4 Wheaton, 316 ; 4 Curtis, 415 ; J. B. Thayer, Cases, 271-285 ; C. E. Boyd, Cases, 308 ; E. McClain, Cases, 1 ; J. Marshall, Writings, 160-188. Gibbons v. Ogden (1824) : 9 Wheaton, 1; 6 Curtis, 1 ; J. B. Thayer, Cases, 1799-1819; C. E. Boyd, Cases, 172; J. Marshall, Writings, 287-315; E. McClain, Cases, 235. Osboru v. Bank of United States (1824): 9 Wheaton, 738; 6 Curtis, 251 ; J. B. Thayer, Cases, ; E. McClain, Cases, 617; J. Marshall, Writings, 315- 142 CONSTITUTIONAL PAPERS [ 343. Rhode Island v. Massachusetts (1838) : 12 Peters, 723 ; 12 Curtis, 407. Legal Tender Cases (1872): 12 Wallace, 457; J. B. Thayer, Case*, 2237-2254; C. E. Boyd, Cases, 136; E. McClain, Cases, 442. Farmers' National Bank v. Bearing (1875) : 91 U. S., 29. Ex, parte Yarbrough (1883) : 110 U. S., 651. Juilliard <>. Greenman (1884): 110 U. S., 421; J. B. Thayer, Cases, 2255; C. E. Boyd, Cases, 157; E. McClain, Cases, 442. Cole v. La Grange (1884): 113 U. S., 1. HISTORICAL DISCUSSIONS. Clark and Hall, Legislative and Documentary History of the Bank of the United States, 15- 31, 37-84, 86-89, 91-94, 95-112; H. Von Hoist, United States, I, 104-107 ; R. Hildreth, United States, IV, 256-267, VI, 211, 226-231 ; M. Van Buren, Political Parties, 136-138; J. Schouler, United States, I, 158-162; G. Tucker, United States, I, 450-458 ; J. T. Morse, Alexander Hamilton, I, 333- 347; G. T. Curtis, Constitutional History, II, 182-190, 589- 600; W. M. Meigs, Growth of the Constitution, 27-34, 128- 134, 306, 307. SOURCES. Constitution of the United States, Preamble ; Art. I, Sect. 1 ; Sect. 8, 18; Sect. 9 ; Sect. 10 ; Art. Ill, Sect. 3, 2; Art. IV, Sect. 2; Sect. 3; Sect. 4; Art. VI, 2; Amends. X ; XI ; XIII, Sect. 2 ; XIV, Sect. 5 ; XV, Sect. 2. A. Hamilton, Opinion on the National Bank, in Works, (ed. 1850) IV, 104-138, (Lodge ed.) Ill, 180-225. T. Jefferson, Opinion on the National Bank, in Works (Wash- ington ed.), VII, 555-561 ; W. MacDonald, Select Documents, Nos. 9-11. Debate in the Convention, in J. Elliot, Debates, V, 543, 544. Debate in the House: Annals of Congress, 1 Cong. (1789), pp. 1891-1960; T. H. Benton, Abridgment, I, 274-308. The Federalist, Nos. 38, 41 (Ford ed., pp. 201, 298). J. Madison, Writings, 73-76. Veto of Madison, March 3, 1817: Senate Journal, 14 Cong., 2 sess. (1817), 405-409; 38, 39] TAXATION AND PROTECTION 143 House Journal, 14 Cong., 2 sess. (1817), 534-537 ; Annals of Congress, 14 Cong., 2 sess. (1817), 1060, 1061; J. D. Rich- ardson, Messages, I, 584. Message of Monroe, May 4, 1822 : Annals of Congress, 17 Cong., 1 sess. (1822), 1809-1863; State Papers, 17 Cong., 1 sess. (1822), IX, No. 127; States- man's Manual, 1, 492-512, II, 513-535. J. D. Richardson, Messages, II, 144. Contemporaries, III, 82, 133; M. Hill, Liberty Documents, chs. xvii, xix. SPECIMEN QUESTIONS. May Congress constitutionally char- ter a life insurance company ? May Congress constitutionally vote money for aid to sufferers from forest fires? May Con- gress constitutionally grant money in support of State schools ? May Congress constitutionally pass an act creating a national university, supported by national taxes? 39. Paper No. 8. Extent of the Powers of Taxa- tion and Protection. BIBLIOGRAPHY. Handbook, 21&, 38, 44, 45, 116, 117; Guide, 158, 185, 195; Brookings and Ringwalt, Briefs for Debate, Nos. xxxvii-xlvi. CONSTITUTIONAL DISCUSSION. J. Story, Commentaries, 906-1053, 1077-1095; J. N. Pomeroy, Constitutional Law, 271-312 ; H. C. Black, Constitutional Law, 179-182, 375-396; J. R. Tucker, Constitution, 215-222, 235-238; T. M. Cooley, Constitutional Law, (ed. 1880) 54-64, (ed. 1891) 53-63, (ed. 1898) 55-63; J. I. C. Hare, Constitutional Law, I, 241-276. ADDITIONAL CONSTITUTIONAL DISCUSSIONS. F. Wharton, Commentaries, 404-415; H. Von Hoist, Constitutional Law, 36; J. Tiffany, Treatise in Government, 171-185; J. D. Andrews, American Law, ch. xv ; C. S. Patterson, United States and the States, ch. iii. CASES. FEDERAL TAXATION. License Tax Cases (1866) : 144 CONSTITUTIONAL PAPERS [ 5 Wallace, 462; J.B. Thayer, Cases, 1276; C. E. Boyd, Cases, 45. Fifield v. Close (1867): 15 Michigan Rep., 505; J. B. Thayer, Cases, 1375. Veazie Bank v. Fenno (1869) : 8 Wal- lace, 533; J. B. Thayer, Cases, 1334; C. E. Boyd, Cases, 56; E. McClain, Cases, 222. Collector /;. Day (1870) : 11 Wallace, 113; J. B. Thayer, Cases, 1378; C. E. Boyd, Cases, 64; E. McClain, Cases, 153. Pollock v. Farmers' Loan and Trust Co. (1894): 157 U. S., 429; 158 U. S., 601; C. E. Boyd, Cases, 91; E. McClain, Cases, 223. STATE TAXATION. McCulloch v. Maryland (1819) : 4 Whea- tou, 316, 325; 4 Curtis, 415, 432; J. B. Thayer, Cases, 1340; C. E. Boyd, Cases, 32; E. McClain, Cases, 1. Weston v. Charleston (1829) : 2 Peters, 449 ; 8 Curtis, 171 ; J. B. Thayer, Cases, 1346; C. E. Boyd, Cases, 41. Providence Bank v. Billings (1830): 4 Peters, 514; 9 Curtis, 171; J. B. Thayer, Cases, 1623. Dobbins v. Commissioners of Erie County (1842): 16 Peters, 435; 14 Curtis, 370; J. B. Thayer, Cases, 1352. Thomson v. Pacific Railroad (1869) : 9 Wallace, 579; J. B. Thayer, Cases, 1369; E. McClain, Cases, 162. State Tax on Foreign Held Bonds (1872) : 15 Wallace, 300 ; J. B. Thayer, Cases, 1258; E. McClain, Cases, 136. Railroad Co. v. Peniston (1873) : 18 Wallace, 5 ; J. B. Thayer, Cases, 1383. Kirtland v. Hotchkiss (1879): 100 U. S., 491 ; J. B. Thayer, Cases, 1268; E. McClain, Cases, 142. Van Brocklin v. Ten- nessee (1885): 117 U. S., 151. California v. Central Pacific Railroad (1888) : 127 U. S., 1; J. B. Thayer, Cases, 1394; E. McClain, Cases, 167. STATE TAXATION FOR PRIVATE ADVANTAGE. Hooper v. Emery (1837) : 14 Maine Rep., 375; J. B. Thayer, Cases, 1209. -Lowell v. Boston (1873): 111 Mass. Rep., 454; J. B. Thayer, Cases, 1224. Loan Association v. Topeka (1874): 20 Wallace, 655; J. B. Thayer, Cases, 1235; C. E. Boyd, Cases, 78; E. McClaiu, Cases, 189. 39] TAXATION AND PROTECTION 145 HISTORICAL DISCUSSIONS. E. G. Bourne, The Surplus Revenue, chs. i-v, xii; H. Von Hoist, United States, I, 398- 405, II, 186-188; E. S. Bolles, Financial History, II, 547, 548; T. H. Benton, Thirty Years' View, I, 275-279, 362-369, 658, 659, II, 36; J. J. Lalor, Cyclopaedia, I, 714, 715, II, 571, III, 856-858, 1033-1038; J. Schouler, United States, I, 86-90, 186-188, IV, 230; A. B. Hart, Salmon P. Chase, ch. ix; H. C. Adams, Taxation in United States, 1789-1816; H. C. Lodge, Daniel Webster, 159-171; C. T. Curtis, Con- stitutional History, 189, 190 ; J. W. Burgess, Middle Period, ch. viii ; J. B. McMaster, United States, I, 545-549 ; W. G. Sumner, Lectures on the History of Protection, 21-33 ; J. G. Blaine, Twenty Years of Congress, I, ch. ix. SOURCES. Constitution of the United States, Preamble ; Art. I, Sect. 1; Sect. 2, 3; Sect. 7, 1 ; Sect. 8, 1, 4-6, 12, 18; Sect. 9, 4, 5, 7 ; Sect. 10, 2; Art. Ill, Sect. 2; Art. IV, Sect. 3, 2. Annals of Congress, 1 Cong. (1789), 102-116, 349-368; Tariff Act of July 4, 1789, in Statutes at Large, I, 24-37. A. Hamilton, Report on Manufactures: Works, (ed. 1850) III, 192-284, (Lodge ed.) Ill, 294-416; F. W. Taussig, State Papers and Speeches on the Tariff, I, 107 ; American State Papers, I, 123-144 ; W. MacDonald, Select Documents, No. 12. The Federalist, (Dawson ed.) 37 r 58, 65, 78, 79, 216, 218, (Ford ed.) 18, 268. G. Washington, Writings, XII, 9, 69,70; Contemporaries, III, 22, 78, 130, IV, 166; Source-Book, 72 ; J. Madison, Writings, I, 479-483, III, 42, 43; T. Jefferson, 'Works, VI, 431, 521-523, VII, 427; J. C. Calhoun, Works, II, 163-173, VI, 2-29.- Clay's report of April 15, 1830, in T. H. Benton, Abridgment, XI, 446 ; opinion of Jackson and veto of December 4, 1833, in J. D. Richardson, Messages, II, 514, 601,111, 56, 161.- Distribution Act of June 23, 1836, in Statutes at Large, V, 52-56. Debates in T. H. Benton, Abridgment, I, 22-44, 10 146 CONSTITUTIONAL PAPERS [ 57-65, 71-84; X, 583-586,592-598, 601-607, 613-625; XI, 444-457, 481-507; XII, 24-27; XIII, 61, 161, 182; XIV, 309-361, 516-526. SPECIMEN QUESTIONS. May Congress lay taxes for the express purpose of distributing the proceeds among the States ? Might the States be compelled to refund the ''deposits" made with them in 1837? May Congress lay a graduated tax upon the States, so as to secure more in proportion from rich States? May individuals refuse to pay taxes laid for the purpose only of accumulating a surplus? 40. Paper No. 9. Rights of Citizens. BIBLIOGRAPHY. Handbook, 2l, 52, 55, 60, 74, 80,87, 95-98. CONSTITUTIONAL DISCUSSIONS. J. Story, Commentaries (4th and 5th eds.), 1103, 1104, 1693-1695, 1805, 1806, 1928- 1975; J. R. Tucker, Constitution, 174, 269, 377, 378, pp. 950-974; H. C. Black, Constitutional Law, 443-539; J. W. Burgess, Political Science, I, 184-252 ; J. I. C. Hare, Consti- tutional Law, 511-529, 534-541; H. Von Hoist, Constitu- tional Law, 83-87 ; T. M. Cooley, Constitutional Laic, (ed. 1880) 77, 78, 187-189, 205-248, (ed. 1891) 79, 80, 195-197, 213-259, (ed. 1898) 88, 89, 206-208, 240-263, 268-294; H. Brannon, Fourteenth Amendment, chs. i-iv, vi-xii; S. F. Miller, Constitution, 276-308, 407-412, 660-680 ; W. O. Bate- man, Political and Constitutional Law, 155-172; C. F. Randolph, Law and Policy of Annexation, 52-57, 59-76; J. Tiffany, Treatise in Government, 167-169, 380-392, 554 ; B. Richman, Citizenship of the United States (Political Science Quarterly, V, 104-123) ; W. L. Scruggs, Ambiguous Citizenship (Political Science Quarterly, I, 199-205). ADDITIONAL CONSTITUTIONAL DISCUSSIONS. J. N. Pomeroy, Constitutional Law, 208, 209 ; C. H. Tiedeman, Unwritten 39,40] RIGHTS OF CITIZENS 147 Constitution, ch. viii ; R. Foster, Commentaries, I, ch. vi ; F. Wharton, Commentaries, 431-437, 540, 584-594; T. Walker, American Law, 54; J. Bryce, American Com- monwealth, I, 419-421 ; J. D. Hurd, Law of Freedom and Bondage, ch. xxiii ; A. P. Morse, Civil and Political Status of Inhabitants of Ceded Territories (Harvard Law Review, XII, 262) ; J. D. Andrews, American Law, ch. xxvii ; C. E. Boyd, Basis of Citizenship (Nation, LXVII, 10) ; C. S. Patter- son, United States and the States, ch. xi. CASES. Dred Scott v. Sandford (1857) : 19 Howard, 393; 2 Miller, 1 ; J. B. Thayer, Cases, 480 ; C. E. Boyd, Cases, 491. Significant extracts in American History Leaflets, No. 23 ; Slaughter House Cases (1873) : 16 Wallace, 36 ; J. B. Thayer, Cases, 516 ; C. E. Boyd, Cases, 491 ; E. McClain, Cases, 18. Minor v. Happersett (1874) : 21 Wallace, 162; J. B. Thayer, Cases, 459; E. McClain, Cases, 974. American Insurance Co. v. 365 Bales of Cotton (1828): 1 Peters, 511; 7 Curtis, 685. Boyd v. Nebraska (1892): 143 U. S., 135. Paul v. Virginia (1868) : 8 Wallace, 168; J. B. Thayer, Cases, 1928. Barron v. Mayor of Baltimore (1833): 7 Peters, 243; 10 Curtis, 464; J. B. Thayer, Cases, 449; C. E. Boyd, Cases, 467. Carfield v. Corywell (1825): 4 Wash. C. C., 371; J. B. Thayer, Cases, 453 ; C. E. Boyd, Cases, 505. Pembina Mining and Milling Co. v. Pennsylvania (1888) : 125 U. S., 181; J. B. Thayer, Cases, 468. United States v. Rhodes (1866) : Abbott, U. S., 28 ; J. B. Thayer, Cases, 506. Barte- meyer v. Iowa (1873) : 18 Wallace, 129; J. B. Thayer, Cases, 532. Civil Rights Cases (1883) : 109 U. S., 3 ; J. B. Thayer, Cases, 554; C. E. Boyd, Cases, 518; E. McClain, Cases, 37n. - Roby v. Smith (1891) : 131 Indiana, 342 ; J. B. Thayer, Cases, 457. Hepburn v. Ellzey (1804): 2 Cranch, 445; 1 Curtis, 520; J. B. Thayer, Cases, 348. New Orleans v. Winter (1816): 1 Wheaton, 91; 3 Curtis, 476; J. B. Thayer, 148 CONSTITUTIONAL PAPERS [ Cases, 350ra. Barbier v. Connolly (1885): 113 U. S., 27; J. B. Thayer, Cases, 623; C. E. Boyd, Cases, 307^; E. McClain, Cases, 632. Powell v. Pennsylvania (1888): 127 U. S., 678; J. B. Thayer, Cases, 637. Schollenberger v. Pennsylvania (1898): 171 U. S., 1; E. McClain, Cases, 395. -Munn v. Illinois (1876): 94 U. S., 113; J. B. Thayer, Cases, 743; C. E. Boyd, Cases, 289; E. McClain, Cases, 946. Mugler v. Kansas (1887): 123 U. S., 623; J. B. Thayer, Cases, 782; C. E. Boyd, Cases, 307w ; E. McClain, Cases, 938. Houston v. Moore (1820): 5 Wheaton, 1; 4 Curtis, 535. _ Ward v. Maryland (1870): 12 Wallace, 418; J. B. Thayer, Cases, 1410. Maxwell v. Dow (1900): 176 U. S., 581. HISTORICAL DISCUSSIONS. H. Von Hoist, United States, VI, 1-47-; H. Greeley, American Conflict, I, 251-279 ; J. G. Blaine, Twenty Years of Congress, II, chs. ii, ix-xii ; G. T. Curtis, Constitutional History, II, 375-381 ; J. J. Lalor, Cyclopaedia, I, 478-608, II, 375-381, III, 822 ; A. B. Hart, Salmon P. Chase, 381, 382 ; F. N. Thorpe, Constitutional History of the American People, II, ch. ix ; W. M. Meigs, Growth of the Constitution, 138-140, 257; J. S. Landon, Constitutional History, ch. xv. SOURCES. Constitution of the United States, Art. I, Sect. 2, 2; Sect. 3, 3; Sect. 8, 4 ; Art. Ill, Sect. 3, 2 ; Art. IV, Sect. 2, 1 ; Amends. I-IX ; XIV. Revised Statutes, 347-351, 378, 380; Contemporaries, IV, 152, 155 ; J. C. Calhoun, Works, II, 242 ; Congressional Globe, 39 Cong., 1 sess. (1866), 1757, 1779, 1780, 2890, 2893, 3039, 3041; W. MacDonald. Select Documents, No. 17. SPECIMEN QUESTIONS. Is a citizen of the United States entitled to a jury trial in a State court? Was a Frenchman in 1798 entitled to a jury trial before expulsion from the United States? Is a citizen of the United States entitled to the pro- 40,41] JEFFERSONIAN DEMOCRACY 149 tectioii of the government if he enlists in a foreign army ? Is a citizen of a State entitled to protection.by the United States against lynching? 41. Paper No. 10. Jeffersonian Democracy. BIBLIOGRAPHY. Handbook, 19e, 48 ; Guide, 167, 169 ; H. B. Tompkins, Bibliotheca Jeffersoniana. HISTORICAL DISCUSSIONS. H. Adams, United States, I, 140-148, 170, 171, 178-180, 185-217, 247-263, 272, 277, 445, III, 1-9; E. Channing, United States, 136-138, 145-147, 165-182; A. B. Hart, Formation of the Union, ch. ix ; J. T. Morse, Thomas Jefferson, 33, 43-48, 50-53, 90-95, 103, 112-117, 128-130, 146-148, 154, 209-231, 235, 259-272, 318- 320; H. Von Hoist, United States, I, 31, 72, 75, 78, 159, 168-200; J. Schouler, United States, I, 63-65, 173-179, 423,424, 474, II, 1-12, 58, 59, 69, 80-86, 87-89, 199-204; J. Schouler, Thomas Jefferson ; G. Tucker, United /States, II, 146-148, 243-245, 343-348 ; S. E. Forman, Life of Jefferson, 22-25 ; G. Tucker, Thomas Jefferson, I, 229-232, 252-256, 274-282, 333, 334, 437-441, II, 322-325, 507 ; H. S. Randall, Thomas Jefferson, I, 459-461 ; J. Bryce, American Common- wealth, II, 6-12; Goldwin Smith, United States, 135-139, 155-165 ; J. H. Patton, Democratic Party, II, 168-171 ; E. H. Gillet, Democracy in the United States, 13-38 ; E. M. Shepard, Martin Van Buren, ch. i; J. Story, Commentaries (4th and 5th eds.), 1329;;; W. E. Russell, Jefferson and his Party To-day (Forum, XXI, 513-524); W. J. Bryan, Jeffersonian Principles (North American Review, CLXVIII, 670) ; S. Fowler, Political Opinions of Thomas Jefferson (North American Jteview, CI, 313-335) ; C.E. Merriam, Thomas Paine's Politi- cal Theories (Political /Science Quarterly, XIV, 389-403) ; G. P. Fisher, Jefferson and the Social Compact Theory (Yale fieview, II, 403-417). 150 CONSTITUTIONAL PAPERS [ ADDITIONAL HISTORICAL DISCUSSIONS. H. C. Lodge, Alex- ander Hamilton, 278, 283 ; H. C. Lodge, George Washington, II, 77, 78, 219-230; J. Winsor, Narrative and Critical History, VII, 268-271 ; G. T. Curtis, Constitutional History, I, 033-635; E. Stanwood, Presidential Elections, 24-50 (History of the Presidency, ch. vi) ; J. B. McMaster, United States, II, 51, 533, 534; R. Hildreth, United States, IV, 291-293, V, 419-421 ; H. C. Merwin, Thomas Jefferson ; R. Frothingham, Eise of the Republic, 234, 235, 547 ; F. X. Thorpe, Constitutional History of the American People, I, 42, II, 63-65; H. Adams, John Randolph, 59-61, 62-65; S. H. Gay, James Madison, ch. xvi ; A. Holmes, Parties and their Principles, ch. v; J. A. Stevens, Albert Gallatin, 105, 174; R. M. Ormsby, Whig Party, chs. v-viii ; H. C. Lodge, G-eorge Cabot, 422-435, 456-462, 468-473, 494, 495 ; M. Van Buren, Political Parties, 244-246 ; J. J. Lalor, Cyclopaedia, II, 638; A. Bradford, History of Federal Government, 119^ T. Parker, Historic Americans, 235. SOURCES. First Inaugural Address: A. Johnston, Ameri- can Orations, I, 155-163 ; J. D. Richardson, Messages, I, 321- 324; S. E. Forman, Life of Jefferson, 245-250; Contem- poraries, III, 106. Writings : Massachusetts Historical Society, Collections, Seventh Series, I ; Statesman's Manual, I, 149-218; J. D. Richardson, Messages, I, 324-461. Draft of Declaration of Independence, in American History Leaflets, No. 11. Autobiography, in T. Jefferson, Writings (Washing- ton ed.), 1, 1-110. Characteristic passages: T.Jefferson, Writ- ings, (Ford.ed.) I, 440, III, 225, IV, 269, 426, 476, V, 8, 147, 156, 158, 205, 285-289, VI, 189, VII, 4, 78, 173, 284, 374, 390, VIII, 18, 73, 186; (Washington ed.) II, 100, 105, 122, 166, 221, 249, 253, 330, III, 3,81, 313, IV, 114, 115, 268, 452, 523, 548, VI, 45, 160, 222, 254, 305, 340, 360, 381, 543, 605, VII, 9, 12, 18, 75, 290, 319, 376, 389, VIII, 222, 413, 543, 41,42] DEPENDENT TERRITORIES 151 589, 604, IX, 96, 122 ; S. E. Forman, Life of Jefferson, 138, 140, 145, 155, 169, 174, 190, 191, 201, 215, 217, 218, 220, 232, 233, 235, 272-281, 306-308, 366-368, 379, 380, 382-390, 397-399. Source-Book, 58, 73, 77-81, 89; Contempo- raries, III, 107-110. SPECIMEN QUESTIONS. Would Jefferson have approved of manhood suffrage in our cities ? Did Jefferson believe in the use of force for the defence of a government? Would Jeffer- son have approved of the boss system in cities? Was Jef- ferson a socialist? 42. Paper No. u. Government of Dependent Ter- ritories. BIBLIOGRAPHY. Handbook, We, 20;, 21;, 54, 61, 63-65, 69, 75, 82; Guide, 150, 168, 178, 198; A. P. C. Griffin, List of Books on Colonization. CONSTITUTIONAL DISCUSSIONS. J. Story, Commentaries (4th and 5th eds.), 1317, 1324-1328; H. Von Hoist, Constitutional Law, 52, 53; J. N. Pomeroy, Constitu- tional Law, 490-499; T. M. Cooley, Constitutional Law (ed. 1880), 36, 37, 164-168; (ed. 1891), 35, 36, 170-174; (ed. 1898), 37,38, 182-186; J. Ordronaux, Constitutional Legisla- tion, 509-519 ; M. Farrand, Legislation of Congress for the Government of the Organized Territories of the United States ; H. C. Black, Constitutional Law, 20, 21, 229-235; J. R. Tucker, Constitution, 298-301. ADDITIONAL CONSTITUTIONAL DISCUSSIONS. J. D. Andrews, American Law, 210-239 ; H. Brannon, Fourteenth Amend- ment, ch. iii; F. Wharton, Commentaries, 375, 461-465; W. O. Bateman, Political and Constitutional Law, 249 ; J. Bryce, American Commonwealth, ch. xlvii ; T. Farrar, Manual of the Constitution, 418-433 ; T. Walker, Intro- 152 CONSTITUTIONAL PAPERS [ duction to American Law, 13-15; J. Schouler, Constitu- tional Studies, 179-182. RECENT CONSTITUTIONAL DISCUSSIONS. J. B. Thayer, Our New Possessions (Harvard Law Review, XII, 464-485) ; C. C. Langdell, Status of Our New Territories {Harvard Law Review, XII, 365-392) ; A. L. Lowell, Status of Our New Possessions (Harvard Law Review, XIII, 155-176) ; S. E. Baldwin, Historic Policy of the United States as to Annexa- tion (Yale Review, II, 131-158, also in Amer. Hist. Assoc., Annual Report for 1893, 367-390); S. E. Baldwin, Govern- ment of Island Territory (Harvard Law Review, XII, 393- 416); C. F. Randolph, Law and Policy of Annexation C. F. Randolph, Notes on the Law of Territorial Expansion / C. A. Gardiner, Our Right to Acquire and Hold Foreign Territory ; J. W. Burgess, Government of Distant Territory, Constitution and New Territory (Political Science Quarterly, XIV, 1-18, XV, 388-398); B. Harrison, Status of Annexed Territory (North American Review, CLXXII, 1-22) ; G. F. Edmunds, Insular Cases (North American Review, CLXXIII, 145-153); G. S. Boutwell, The Supreme Court and Dependencies (North American Review, CLXXIII, 154-160) ; S. E. Baldwin, The Supreme Court and the Insular Cases (Yale Review, X, 129- 143) ; J. B. Thayer, Insular Tariff Cases (Harvard Law Review, XV, 164-168); C. E. Littlefield, The Insular Cases (Harvard Law Review, XV, 169, 281) ; L. S. Rowe, Insular Decisions (Amer. Acad. Pol. Sci., Annals, XVIII, 226-250); W. Reid, Problems of Expansion ; C. E. Magoon, Report on the Legal Status of Territory acquired by the United Suites during the War with Spain; E. Freund, Control of Dependencies (Political Science Quarterly, XIV, 19-38) ; R. D. Hunt, Legal Status of California, 1846-1849 (Amer. Acad. Pol. Sci., Annals, XVIII, 226-250); T. H. Giddings, Democracy and Empire, chs. i, xvi, xvii ; T. Williams, Ethical 42] DEPENDENT TERRITORIES 153 and Political Principles of Expansion (Amer. Acad. Pol. Sci., Annals, XVI, 227-242). CASES BEFORE 1899. Dred Scott v. Sandford (1857): 19 Howard, 393; 2 Miller, 1; C. E. Boyd, Cases, 481. United States v. Gratiot (1840): 14 Peters, 526; 13 Curtis, 644.- American Insurance Co. -v. Canter (1828): 1 Peters, 511; 7 Curtis, 685 ; J. B. Thayer, Cases, 350 ; C. E. Boyd, Cases, 583 ; E. McClain, Cases, 827. Sere v. Pitot (1810) : 6 Cranch, 332 ; 2 Curtis, 423 ; J. B. Thayer, Cases, 349. National Bank v. County of Yankton (1879) : 101 U. S., 129 ; E. McClain, Cases, 830/1. Mormon Church v. United States (1890): 136 U. S., 1; E. McClain, Cases, 835. Murphy v. Ramsey (1885): 114 U. S., 15. Reynolds v. United States (1878) : 98 U. S., 145 ; E. McClain, Cases, 833w. Callan v. Wilson (1888): 127 U. S., 540; J. B. Thayer, Cases, 358; E. McClain, Cases, 834. In re Ross (1891) : 140 U. S., 453 ; J. B. Thayer, Cases, 366. Thompson v. Utah (1898) : 170 U. S., 343; E. McClain, Cases, 831. Loughborough v. Blake (1820) : 5 Wheaton, 317 ; 4 Curtis, 643 ; J. B. Thayer, Cases, 349^; J. Marshall, Writings, 211. American Publishing Co. v. Fisher (1897) : 166 U. S., 464. Capital Traction Co. v. Hof (1899) : 174 U. S., 1. CASES SINCE 1899. De Lima v. Bidwell (1901) : 182 U. S., 1. Dooley v. United States (1901) : 182 U.S., 222. Downes v. Bidwell (1901): 182 U. S., 244. The Diamond Rings (1901). Dooley v. United States (Dec. 2, 1901). A. H. Howe, The Insular Cases (1901) (House Documents, 56 Cong., 2 sess., No. 509). HISTORICAL DISCUSSIONS PREVIOUS TO 1898. H. Von Hoist, United States, III, 308, 322, 351, 385-401, 422-430, 442-455; J. F. Rhodes, United States, I, 424-484; T. Donaldson, Public Domain, 56-88, 416-464; J. J. Lalor, Cyclopaedia, III, 914- 920 ; T. Roosevelt, Thomas H. Benton, 317-340; J. Schouler, United States, V, 97-100, 115-119, 157-190, 289-293; T. H. 154 CONSTITUTIONAL PAPERS [ Benton, Thirty Years' View, II, 696-700, 713-715, 721-726, 729-736 ; H. Von Hoist, John G. Calhoun, 288-307 ; H. Greeley, American Conflict, I, 188-193, 259, 260 ; G. T. Curtis, Daniel Webster, II, 360-373. HISTORICAL DISCUSSIONS SINCE 1898. A. L. Lowell, The Colonial Expansion of the United States (Atlantic Monthly, LXXXIII, 145-154); C. E. Boyd, Government of Newly Ac- quired Territory (Atlantic Monthly, LXXXII, 735-742) ; A. B. Hart, Foundations of American Foreign Policy, chs. v, vi ; H. P. Judson, Our Federal Constitution and Expansion (Review of Reviews, XIX, 67, XXI, 451). Speech of G. F. Hoar (April, 1900), Congressional Record, 56 Cong., 1 sess., 4278-4306. SOURCES. Constitution of the United States, Preamble ; Art. I, Sect. 8, 17, 18; Art. IV, Sect. 3, 2 ; Art. VI, 2 ; Amends. I; VIII; X. Calhoun's resolutions of Feb. 19, 1847: Works, IV, 346-349, 498, 499; Congressional Globe, 29 Cong., 2 sess. (1847), 453-455; A. H. Stephens, War be- tween the States, II, 166-168. Walker's amendment of 1849: Congressional Globe, 30 Cong., 2 sess. (1849), 561 ; debate, in Congressional Globe, 30 Cong., 2 sess., App. 265-289 ; D. Webster, Works, V, 30-312; J. C. Calhoun, Works, IV, 336-396. S. A. Douglas' views: Harper's Magazine, XIX, 519-537; Debates between Lincoln and Douglas, 93-105; A. Johnston, American Orations, II, 218-255, III, 17-27. A. Lincoln's views : A. Johnston, American Orations, III, 3- 17; Debates between Lincoln and Douglas, 1-5, 14-24. Treaty of Paris, Dec. 10, 1898, Senate Documents, 55 Cong., 3 sess., No. 62, part i. Report on government of Hawaii, House Reports, 56 Cong., 1 sess. (1900), No. 305. Report of Philippine Commission to President, Senate Documents, 56 Cong., 1 sess. (1900), No. 138. Philippine Information Society, Publications. Contemporaries, III, 111-115, IV, 186-191. 42,43] IMPAIRMENT OF CONTRACTS 155 SPECIMEN QUESTIONS. Are the inhabitants of a territory entitled to all the privileges and immunities enjoyed by inhabi- tants of a State ? May Congress deprive a territory of repre- sentative government? May Congress dissolve corporations created by territorial law? May Congress prohibit the exer- cise of a particular religious faith in a territory ? 43. Paper No. 12. Impairment of Contracts. BIBLIOGRAPHY. Guide, 175. CONSTITUTIONAL DISCUSSIONS. J. Story, Commentaries, 1374-1400; T. M. Cooley, Constitutional Law, (ed. 1880) 300- 314, (ed. 1891) 311-327, (ed. 1898) 328-345; F. Wharton, Commentaries, 477-498; J. N. Pomeroy, Constitutional Law, 538-627; H. Von Hoist, Constitutional Law, 79 ; H. C. Black, Constitutional Law, 429, 430, 604-625; J. R. Tucker, Constitution, 270, 271, 387-389; J. D. Andrews, American Law, 196, 389-394. ADDITIONAL CONSTITUTIONAL DISCUSSIONS. C. S. Patterson, The United States and the States, ch. v ; J. Kent, Commentaries, I, 413-424 ; H. C. Black, Constitutional Prohibitions, part i; W. Rawle, View of the Constitution, 101, 102, 136, 137; J. Schouler, Constitutional Studies, 152, 153. CASES. Sturges v. Crowninshield (1819): 4 Wheaton, 122; 4 Curtis, 362; C. E. Boyd, Cases, 405; E. McClain, Cases, 438 ; J. B. Thayer, Cases, 268 ; J. Marshall, Writ- ings, 147-160. Dartmouth College v. Woodward (1819): 4 Wheaton, 518; 4 Curtis, 463; C. E. Boyd, Cases, 412; E. McClain, Cases, 1006; J. Marshall, Writings, 188-210; J. B. Thayer, Cases, 1564. Fletcher v. Peck (1810) : 6 Cranch, 87 ; 2 Curtis, 328; C. E. Boyd, Cases, 395; J. B. Thayer, Cases, 114; J. Marshall, Writings, 126-141. Louisiana v. Mayor of New Orleans (1883) : 109 U. S., 285 ; E. McClain, Cases, 1047. Ogden v. Saunders (1827) : 12 Wheaton, 213; 7 Cur- 156 CONSTITUTIONAL PAPERS [ tis, 132 ; J. B. Thayer, Cases, 1590 ; C. E. Boyd, Gases, 431 ; J. Marshall, Writings, 624-680. Providence Bank v. Billings (1830): 4 Peters, 514; 9 Curtis, 171; J. B. Thayer, Cases, 1623; C. E. Boyd, Cases, 459; E. McClain, Cases, lOllra. The Binghamton Bridge (1865): 3 Wallace, 51; J. B. Thayer, Cases, 1753. Antoni v. Greenhow (1882): 107 U. S., 769. Poindexter v. Greenhow (1885) : 114 U. S., 270 ; E. McClain, Cases, 469?*. New Orleans Gas Co. v. Louisiana Light Co. (1885) : 115 U. S., 650 ; E. McClain, Cases, 101 7w. Stone v. Mississippi (1879): 101 U. S., 814; E. McClain, Cases, 1016/i ; J. B. Thayer, Cases, 1771. Hans v. Louisiana (1890) : 134 U. S., 1 ; J. B. Thayer, Cases, 293; C. E. Boyd, Cases, 643 ; E. McClain, Cases, 702. Beer Co. v. Massachusetts (1877): 97 U. S., 25; J. B. Thayer, Cases, 757; E. McClain, Cases, 1014. New Orleans Waterworks Co. v. Louisiana Sugar Refining Co. (1888): 125 U. S., 18; J. B. Thayer, Cases, 1536^. Beers v. Arkansas (1857): 20 Howard, 527; 2 Miller, 564; J. B. Thayer, Cases, 1556. New Jersey v. Wilson (1812): 7 Cranch, 164; 2 Curtis, 498 ; J. B. Thayer, Cases, 1561. Charles River Bridge v. Warren Bridge (1837) : 11 Peters, 420; 12 Curtis, 496; J. B. Thayer, Cases, 1628; C. E. Boyd, Cases, 451. Bronson v. Kinzie (1843) : 1 Howard, 311; 14 Curtis, 628; J. B. Thayer, Cases, 1645; E. McClain, Cases, 1028. Virginia Coupon Cases (1885): 114 U. S., 269. McGahey v. Virginia (1890): 135 U.' S., 662; J. B. Thayer, Cases, 1664; E. McClain, Cases, lOOlrc. Tom- linson v. Jessup (1872): 15 Wallace, 454 ; J. B. Thayer, Cases, 1090. Fertilizing Co. v. Hyde Park (1878) : 97 U. S., 659 ; J. B. Thayer, Cases, 1762. Butchers' Union Co. v. Cres- cent City Co. (1884): 111 U. S., 746; J. B. Thayer, Cases, 537. HISTORICAL DISCUSSIONS. H. C. Lodge, Daniel Webster, 72-98; G. Van Santvoord, Lives of Chief Justices, 411-413, 43,44] REGULATION OF COMMERCE 157 450-459 ; W. W. Story, Joseph Story, I, 321, 322 ; G. T. Curtis, Daniel Webster, I, 162-171; W. G. Sumner, Andrew Jackson, 128-130; J. J. Lalor, Cyclopedia, III, 1129, 1130; W. M. Meigs, Growth of the Constitution, 182-186, 311 ; S. G. Fisher, Evolution of the Constitution, 262-264. SOURCES. Constitution of the United States, Art. I, Sect. 8, 18; Sect. 10, 1; Art. Ill, Sect. 2, 1 ; Art. VI, 2 ; Amend. XL D. Webster, Works, V, 462-501; T. Jefferson, Writings (Washington ed.), VI, 460-463 ; Federalist (Ford ed.), 296. SPECIMEN QUESTIONS. May Congress pass a bankruptcy law applying to debts contracted before the date of the act? May a State revoke the charter of a railroad? May a State pass an act repudiating the payment of its debts? May a State revoke a license to sell liquor before its expiration, if the holder has complied with its conditions? 44. Paper No. 13. Regulation of Commerce. BIBLIOGRAPHY. Handbook, 211, 38, 39, 45, 92, 119 ; Guide, 170, 171, 174, 175, 179, 195; Brookings and Ringwalt, Brief s for Debate, Nos. xxxix, xl. CONSTITUTIONAL DISCUSSIONS. J. Story, Commentaries (espe- cially ed. 1891), 1056-1101, 1281, 1289-1293 ; T. M. Cooley, Constitutional Law, (ed. 1880) 64-77, (ed. 1891) 63-79, (ed. 1898), 66-88; F. Wharton, Commentaries, 418-430; J. N. Pomeroy, Constitutional Law, 321-384; H. Von Hoist, Constitutional Law, 38; W. O. Bateman, Political and Consti- tutional Law, 215-225; J. Tiffany, Treatise in Government, 359-380; J. I. C. Hare, Constitutional Law, I, 427-504; H. C. Black, Constitutional Law, 186-207; J. R. Tucker, Con- stitution, 250-268; J. D. Andrews, American Law, ch. xvi. ADDITIONAL CONSTITUTIONAL DISCUSSIONS. W. A. Duer, 158 CONSTITUTIONAL PAPERS [ Constitutional Jurisprudence, 245-264 ; Prentice and Egan, Commerce Clause; W. Rawle, View of the Constitution, 82-84; C. S. Patterson, United States and the States, ch. iv. CASES. Gibbons v. Ogden (1824) : 9 Wheaton, 1 ; 6 Curtis, 1 ; J. B. Thayer, Cases, 730, 1799; J. Marshall, Writings, 287- 315; C.E. Boyd, Cases, 172; E. McClain, Cases, 235. Brown v. Maryland (1827): 12 Wheaton, 419; 7 Curtis, 262; J. B. Thayer, Cases, 1826; C. E. Boyd, Cases, 192; E. McClain, Cases, 303 ; J. Marshall, Writings, 358-372. Willson v. Black- bird Creek Marsh Co. (1829): 2 Peters, 245; 8 Curtis, 105; J. B. Thayer, Cases, 1837; C. E. Boyd, Cases, 216; E. Mc- Clain, Cases, 273. New York v. Miln (1837): 11 Peters, 102; 12 Curtis, 357; J. B. Thayer, Cases, 1840. License Cases (1846): 5 Howard, 504; 16 Curtis, 513; J. B. Thayer, Cases, 1851; C. E. Boyd, Cases, 204. Passenger Cases (1848): 7 Howard, 283; 17 Curtis, 122; J. B. Thayer, Cases, 1865; C. E. Boyd, Cases, 219. Pennsylvania v. Wheeling Bridge Co. (1855): 13 Howard, 518; 19 Curtis, 621; J. B. Thayer, Cases, 1889 ; E. McClain, Cases, 282. Welton v. Missouri (1875): 91 U. S., 275; J. B. Thayer, Cases, 1957; E. Mc- Clain, Cases, 313. License Tax Cases (1866): 5 Wallace, 462; J. B. Thayer, Cases, 737; C. E. Boyd, Cases, 45. Cooley v. Board of Wardens (1851) : 12 Howard, 299 ; 19 Curtis, 143; J. B. Thayer, Cases, 1879; C. E. Boyd, Cases, 235; E. McClain, Cases, 275. United States v. Dewitt (1869): 9 Wallace, 41 ; J. B. Thayer, Cases, 735 ; C. E. Boyd, Cases, 495. Henderson v. Mayor of New York (1875): 92 U. S., 259; J. B. Thayer, Cases, 738. Conway v. Taylor's Executor (1861): 1 Black, 603; 4 Miller, 633; J. B. Thayer, Cases, 1906. Oilman v. Philadelphia (1865) : 3 Wallace, 713; J. B. Thayer, Cases, 1912. Crandall v. Nevada (1867) : 6 Wallace, 35; J. B. Thayer, Cases, 1364; C. E. Boyd, Cases, 49. Woodruff v. Parham (1868) : 8 Wallace, 123; J. B. Thayer, 44] REGULATION OF COMMERCE 159 Cases, 1922. Paul r. Virginia (1868) : 8 Wallace, 168; J. B. Thayer, Cases, 1928 ; E. McClain, Cases, 855. Escanaba Co. r. Chicago (1882): 107 U. S., 678; J. B. Thayer, Cases, 2002; C. E. Boyd, Cases, 299; E. McClain, Cases, 285.- Brown v. Houston (1885): 114 U. S., 622; J. B. Thayer, Cases, 2022; E. McClain, Cases, 333. Smith v. Alabama (1888): 124 U. S., 465; J. B. Thayer, Cases, 797, 2068.- Bowman v. Chicago and Northwestern Railway Co. (1888) : 125 U. S., 465; J. B. Thayer, Cases, 2080, 2109. Leisy v. Hardin (1890): 135 U. 8., 100; J. B. Thayer, Cases, 2104; C. E. Boyd, Cases, 269; E. McClain, Cases, 378. In re Rahrer (1891): 140 U. S., 545; J. B. Thayer, Cases, 2133. Maine v. Grand Trunk Railway Co. (1891): 142 U. S., 217; J. B. Thayer, Cases, 2139. Plumley v. Massachusetts (1894) : 155 U. S., 461 ; J. B. Thayer, Cases, 2173. Railroad Co. v. Husen (1877): 95 U. S., 465; J. B. Thayer, Cases, 753, 2182; C. E. Boyd, Cases, 277 ; E. McClain, Cases, 367. United States v. E. C. Knight Co. (1895) : 156 U. S., 1 ; J. B. Thayer, Cases, 2185 ; E. McClain, Cases, 263. HISTORICAL DISCUSSIONS. H. Adams, United States, IV, 128- 475 ; J. B. McMaster, United States, III, 276-339 ; R. Hildreth, United States, VI, 36-44, 69-138 ; J. Schouler, United States, II, 156-204; H. Von Hoist, United States, I, 200-220; J. J. Lalor, Cyclopaedia, I, 772, II, 79, 85, 109; J. T. Morse, Thomas Jefferson, 286-320 ; J. T. Morse, John Quincy Adams, 52-57; G. Tucker, United States, II, 307, 321-325, 341, 342; T. Dwight, Hartford Convention, 83-106; G. Tucker, Thomas Jef- ferson, II, 248-250, 283-287 ; H. S. Randall, Thomas Jefferson, III, 239-307 ; H. C. Lodge, George Cabot, 367-372, 374, 382, 395 ; H. Adams, Albert Gallatin, 365-381 ; G. T. Curtis, Constitu- tional History, II, 7 ; W. M. Meigs, Growth of the Constitution, 135-138, 173-175; S. G. Fisher, Evolution of the Constitution, 225, 293 ; J. S. Landon, Constitutional History, 349-353. 160 CONSTITUTIONAL PAPERS [ SOURCES. Constitution of the United States, Art. I, Sect. 8, 3, 18; Sect. 9, 1, 5, 6 ; Sect. 10, 2; Art. IV, Sect. 2, 1 ; Art. VI, 2. Thomas Jefferson, Messages of Oct. 27 and Dec. 18, 1807: Statesman's Manual, I, 200-203, 204; Annals of Congress, 10 Cong., 1 sess. (1807), 14, 50; J. IX Richardson, Messages, I, 425. Embargo Acts of Dec. 22, 1807, Jan. 9, March 12, April 25, 1808: Statutes at Large, Il r 451, 453, 473, 499; W. MacDonald, Select Documents, Nos. 27, 28. Debates: Annals of Congress, 10 Cong., 1 sess. (1807), 50,51, 1216-1220; T. H. Benton, Abridgment, III, 640-644, 678-707. Contemporary discussions: M. Carey, The Olive Branch, chs. xxiv, xxv; J. Q. Adams, Memoirs, I, 491, 535; E. Quincy, Josiah Quincy, 127-130, 139, 183; T. Jefferson, Writ- ings (Washington ed.), V, 226-243 ; Niles" Register, XXXV, 138 ; W. W. Story, Joseph Story, I, 165, 174-187, 223 ; The Federalist (Ford ed.), 65-72, 276; Source-Book, 81 ; Contemporaries, III, 54, IV, 165. SPECIMEN QUESTIONS. May Congress by statute prohibit importation of goods? May the States in any way regulate interstate commerce? May Congress prohibit the exportation of goods? May Congress regulate commerce wholly within a State? 45. Paper No. 14. Internal Improvements. BIBLIOGRAPHY. Handbook, 19/, 19#, 21/, 21w, 38, 39, 44; Guide, 174, 179, 180, 185; Brookings and Ringwalt, Briefs for Debate, No. Ivi. CONSTITUTIONAL DISCUSSIONS. J. Story, Commentaries, 1124-1150, 1272-1277; J. N. Pomeroy, Constitutional Law, 382, 412; H. Von Hoist, Constitutional Law, 41 ; T. M. Cooley, Constitutional Law, (ed. 1880) 94, (ed. 1891) 97, (ed. 1898), 107; H. Von Hoist, United States, I, 388-396; H. C. 44,45] INTERNAL IMPROVEMENTS 161 Black, Constitutional Law, 213-216 ; J. R. Tucker, Constitution, 276; J. D. Andrews, American Law, ch. xx. ADDITIONAL CONSTITUTIONAL DISCUSSIONS. F. Wharton, Com- mentaries, 446, 447; W. O. Bateman, Political and Constitu- tional Law, 227 ; Prentice and Egan, Commerce Clause, 107- 112, 313-315; W. Rawle, View of the Constitution, 103, 104; H. Clay, Life and Speeches, I, 300-320; J. C. Calhoun, Works, II, 186-197; E. C. Mason, Veto Power, 83-97; T. H. Benton, Thirty Tears' View, I, 21-27. CASES. Luxton v. North River Bridge Co. (1894): 153 U. S., 525; J. B. Thayer, Cases, 2160. Stockton v. Balti- more and New York Railroad Co. (1887) : 32 Federal Reporter, 9 ; J. B. Thayer, Cases, 2067rc. California v. Pacific Railroad Co. (1888): 127 U. S., 39; E. McClain, Cases, 167; J. B. Thayer, Cases, 1394. Searight v. Stokes (1845) : 3 Howard, 151 ; 15 Curtis, 346. Pensacola Telegraph Co. v. Western Union Telegraph Co. (1877): 96 U. S., 1 ; J. B. Thayer, Cases, 1985 ; C. E. Boyd, Cases, 255 ; E. McClain, Cases, 252. Oilman v. Philadelphia (1865): 3 Wallace, 713; J. B. Thayer, Cases, 1912. Miller v. Mayor of New York (1883) : 109 U. S., 385. Wisconsin v. Duluth (1877) : 96 U. S., 379. HISTORICAL DISCUSSIONS. E. R. Johnson, River and Harbor Bills (Amer. Acad. Pol. Sci., Annals, II, 782) ; H. S. Tanner, Memoir on Internal Improvements; J. J. Lalor, Cyclopaedia, I, 609, II, 568-570; A. B. Hart, Practical Essays, No. ix; The Old National Pike (Harper's Magazine, LIX, 801) ; D. C. Oil- man, James Monroe, 239-248; H. Adams, Albert Gallatin, 351, 352; H. Von Hoist, John C. Calhoun, 27-41 ; W. O. Sumner, Andrew Jackson, 191-194; H. O. Wheeler, History of Congress, II, 109-124, 145-159; J. W. Burgess, Middle Period, 14-18, 116-122, 155-157, 166-189; W. M. Meigs, Growth of the Constitution, 306, 307. SOURCES. Constitution of the United States, Art. I, Sect. 11 162 CONSTITUTIONAL PAPERS [ 8, 1, 3, 7, 12; Art. IV, Sect. 3, 2. Debates in the Federal Convention, in J. Elliot, Debates, V, 543-545. Hamilton's suggestions (1791), in Annals of Congress, 2 Cong. (1791), 1015, 1016. Ohio Act of 1802 (Sect. 7, 3), in /Statutes at Large, II, 175. Cumberland Road Act of March 29, 1806, in Statutes at Large, II, 357. Extracts from Jefferson's Message of Dec. 2, 1806 : Statesman's Manual, I, 190, 191 ; Annals of Congress, 9 Cong., 2 sess. (1806), 14, 15; J. D. Richardson, Messages, I, 409, 410. Gal- latin's Report of April 4, 1808, in American State Papers, Miscellaneous, I, 724-741. Latrobe's Reports of March 16 and April 1, 1808, in American State Papers, Mis- cellaneous, I, 910-916. Madison's Veto of March 3, 1817: Annals of Congress, 14 Cong., 2 sess. (1817), 1059 ; Senate Journal, 14 Cong., 2 sess. (1817), 406; J. D. Richardson, Messages, I, 584. Monroe's Veto of May 4, 1822: Annals of Congress, 17 Cong., 1 sess. (1822), 1809-1863; Statesman's Manual, I, 492-512, II, 513-534 ; J. D. Richardson, Messages, II, 144-183. Jackson's Veto of May 27, 1830 : Statesman's Manual, II, 719-728 ; House Journal, 21 Cong., 1 sess. (1830), 733-742 ; J. D. Richardson, Messages, II, 483-493. Cleveland's Veto of May 29, 1896, in J. D. Richardson, Messages, IX, 677- 679. Debates : Annals of Congress, 14 Cong., 2 sess. (1817), 851-923; T. H. Benton, Abridgment, V, 676, 704-711. House Resolutions of March 14, 1818, in Annals of Congress, 15 Cong., 1 sess. (1818), 1381-1384. T. Jefferson, Writ- ings (Washington ed.), IV, 131, 449, 478, VII, 77-79, IX, 496-500; A. Gallatin, Writings, I, 395,396; Contemporaries, III, 131. SPECIMEN QUESTIONS. May Congress improve a waterway wholly within a State, without the consent of that State? May Congress construct irrigation canals? May Congress construct an interoceanic canal across the territory of Nica- 45,46] MONROE DOCTRINE 163 ragua ? May Congress construct and operate grain elevators at tide-water terminals? 46. Paper No. 15. Application of the Monroe Doctrine. BIBLIOGRAPHY. Handbook, 19/, 20/, 20^, 20t, 20;, 21m, 72, 79, 83, 89; Guide, 178, 179, 192, 199; D. C. Gilman, James Monroe, 269-272, Brookings and Ringwalt, Briefs for Debate, No. xxv. CONSTITUTIONAL DISCUSSIONS. F. Wharton, Commentaries, 174, 175; W. B. Lawrence, Commentaire sur les Elements du Droit International, II, 297-394 ; D. Webster, Works, III, 178, 201-217; Dana's Wheaton, 97-112 notes. HISTORICAL DISCUSSIONS. G. F. Tucker, The Monroe Doctrine ; T. Roosevelt, American Ideals, No. xi ; J . W. Foster, Century of American Diplomacy, ch. xii; W. F. Reddaway, The Monroe Doctrine ; W. E. Curtis, United States and Foreign Powers; T. S. Woolsey, America's Foreign Policy, 223-238; J. W. Burgess, Middle Period, 123-128; J. H. Latane, Diplomatic Relations of United States and Spanish America; A. B. Hart, Foundations of American Foreign Policy, ch. vii (from American Historical Review, VII, 77-91) ; L. M. Keasbey, Nicaragua Canal and Monroe Doctrine-, J. B. McMaster, With the Fathers, 1-54; H. Von Hoist, United States, I, 412-423 ; D. C. Gilman, James Monroe, 156-174; J. J. Lalor, Cyclopaedia, II, 898-900; F. Snow, Treaties and Topics, part ii; J. B. Moore, Monroe Doctrine (Political Science Quarterly, XI, 1-29) ; J. W. Burgess, Recent Pseudo- Monroeism (Political Science Quar- terly, XI, 44-67) ; S. E. Baldwin, Modern Political Institu- tions, ch. xiii. ADDITIONAL HISTORICAL DISCUSSIONS. W. Reid, Problems of Expansion, 18-20 ; J. B. McMaster, United States, V, 164 CONSTITUTIONAL PAPERS [ 28-54, 433-459 ; R. Rush, Narrative of a Residence at the Court of London, ch. xxiii; J. T. Morse. John Quincy Adams, 129-149; T. K. Lothrop, William Henry Seward, 387-395; F. Bancroft, William H. Seward, II, 419-442 ; J. B. Moore, A Hundred Years of American Diplomacy (Harvard Law Review, XIV, 165) ; R. Olney, Growth of our Foreign Policy (Atlantic Monthly, LXXXV, 289). INSTANCES OF APPLICATION OF MONROE DOCTRINE. 1824, Greek question; 1826, Panama Congress; 1845, Texas and Oregon questions; 1848, Yucatan question; 1850, Clayton- Bulwer treaty ; 1850-1860, Balize and Mosquito coast ques- tions; 1854, Ostend Manifesto; 1861-1867, French intervention in Mexico; 1870, San Domingo; 1881, Nicaragua Canal; 1881, Chile-Peru war; 1890, Bering Sea question; 1895, Venezulean question; 1900, Canal questions. SOURCES. Constitution of the United States, Art. I, Sect. 7, 1; Sect. 8, 3, 10-15, 18; Sect. 9, 1, 6, 7; Sect. 10; Art. II, Sect. 1, 1; Sect. 2; Art. Ill, Sect. 2, 1, 2; Art. VI, 1, 2. Extracts from official declarations of the United States, in American History Leaflets, Nos. 4 (Mon- roe Doctrine), 6 (Bering Sea) ; Contemporaries, III, 142, 145, 147, 148, IV, 177, 179, 192, 196. Messages : Old South Leaflets, No. 56 ; W. MacDonald, Select Documents, No. 43; J. D. Richardson, Messages, I, 183, 222, 361, 488, II, 105, 116, 218, 260, 319, 334, 512, IV, 398, 512, 540, 582, VII, 61, 100, 129, IX, 632, 655; Annals of Congress, 18 Cong., 1 sess. (1823), 12-23 ; Congressional Debates, 18 Cong., 2 sess. (1824), App., 2-8. F. Wharton, Digest of International Law, 57-61, 72 ; Treaties and Conventions of the United States, (ed. 1889) 441 (1850), 939 (1867) ; J. Q. Adams, Memoirs, VI, 163, 178, 179, 186-194, 202, 207; T. Jefferson, Writings (Wash- ington ed.), VII, 315-317 ; J. Madison, Writings, III, 339-354. Ostend Manifesto : American History Leaflets, No. 2 ; W. MacDonald, Select Documents, No. 89. 46,47J STATUS OF SLAVERY 165 SPECIMEN QUESTIONS. Was the attempt to construct a Panama canal by a French company contrary to the Monroe Doctrine? Would a German protectorate of Brazil be contrary to the Monroe Doctrine ? Would a transfer of Hayti to Great Britain be contrary to the Monroe Doctrine ? Would an inde- pendent Canadian kingdom be contrary to the Monroe Doctrine ? 47. Paper No. 16. Social and Economic Status of Slavery. BIBLIOGRAPHY. Handbook, 19#, 19A, 133; Guide, 186, 187 ; Minutes of Abolition Conventions (American His- torical Review, V, 804, 805). SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC DISCUSSIONS. F. L. Olmstead, The Seaboard Slave States, especially chs. iii, viii, x ; F. L. Olm- stead, A Texas Journey, especially ch. vii; F. L. Olmstead, The Back Country, especially chs. ii, viii, x ; F. L. Olmstead, The Cotton Kingdom, especially I, chs. iv, v, II, chs. v- viii, Appendix ; F. A. Kemble, Life on a Georgia Planta- tion; F. Douglass, My Bondage and Freedom ; F. Douglass, Life and Times ; H. R. Helper, Impending Crisis, chs. i, viii, ix; N. Adams, A South- Side View of Slavery ; J. F. Rhodes, United States, I, ch. iv; J. Schouler, United States, I, 239-241, III, ch. xvii, IV, 203-209 ; A. H. Stephens, War between the States, II, 80-83 ; S. Northrup, Twelve Years a Slave / J. D. DeBow, Industrial Resources of the South and West ; H. Von Hoist, United States, I, ch. ix; W. Goodell, Slavery and Anti- Slavery / J. J. Lalor, Cyclopcedia, III, 728-730 ; Goldwin Smith, United States, 221-228 ; J. E. Cairnes, Slave Power, chs. ii-vi. ADDITIONAL SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC DISCUSSIONS. J. H. Hopkins, A View of Slavery ; J. W. Draper, Civil War, I, chs. xvi, xxv ; S. Nott, Slavery and the Remedy, chs. i, iii; L. M. F. Child, Authentic Anecdotes of American Slavery ; 166 CONSTITUTIONAL PAPERS [ L. Coffin, Reminiscences ; H. Von Hoist, J. G. Calhoun, 124- 183 ; C. Elliott, Sinf illness of American Slavery, II, part v, chs. i-iv, vi ; H. Greeley, American Conflict, I, chs. vi, xvi ; M. G. McDougall, Fugitive Slaves; J. D. Butler, British Convicts Shipped to American Colonies (American Historical Review, II, 12-33) ; J. G. Brackett, The Negro in Mary- land; W. Harper, J. H. Hammond, T. R. Dew, W. G. Simms, Pro-Slavery Argument ; R. Hildreth, Depotism in America ; Comte de Paris, Civil War, I, book ii, ch. i; W. H. Siebert, Underground Railroad; A. Barnes, Scriptural View of Sla- very ; D. R. Goodwin, Southern Slavery in its Present Aspects. SOURCES. T. Jefferson, Notes on Virginia, 227-273; Con- temporaries, III, 10, 19, 24, 169-173, 175, IV, 23-28; Source-Rook, 46, 95, 98, 113; Gov. McDuffie's Message, in American History Leaflets, No. 10 ; Diary of John Har- rower (American Historical Review, VI, 65-107). SPECIMEN QUESTIONS. Was slavery an advantage to the large planters ? Did slavery make more rapid the opening of lands to cultivation? Did slavery produce more for the white race in general than they would have received under a system of white labor ? Was slavery opposed to the improvement of agricultural processes on large plantations? 48. Paper No. 17. Jacksonian Democracy. BIBLIOGRAPHY. Handbook, 19#, 41; Guide, 181. HISTORICAL DISCUSSIONS. H. Von Hoist, United States, II, ch. i; Goldwin Smith, United States, 191-206 ; J. W. Burgess, Middle Period, 163-241 ; J. Winsor, Narrative and Critical History, VII, 281-290, 348-352; R. H. Gillet, Democracy in the United States, 67, 68, 133-145; C. H. Peck, Jacksonian Epoch, chs. iv-viii ; J. Parton, Andrew Jackson ; W. G. Sum- ner, Andrew Jackson; G. Tucker, United States, IV, chs- xxvi-xxix; T. H. Benton, Thirty Years' View, I, 119-734;. 47,48] JACKSONIAN DEMOCRACY 167 H. Greeley, American Conflict, I, 88-106 ; J. Schouler, United States, chs. xiii, xiv ; R. M. Ormsby, Whig Party, chs. xviii-xxii; J. H. Pattern, Democratic Party, 71-82, 168- 171 ; A. D. Morse, Political Influence of Andrew Jackson (Political Science Quarterly, I, 153-162); M. Chevalier, Society, Manners, and Politics in the United States, chs. xvi, xvii ; J. S. Landon, Constitutional History, 178-184; J. B. McMaster, United States, V, ch. Hi ; H. C. Lodge, Daniel Webster, ch. vii ; C. Schurz, Henry Clay, chs. x, xviii ; J. T. Morse, John Quincy Adams, 158-163, 169-175, 184-187, 195-242; Gold- win Smith, American Statesmen (Nineteenth Century, XXIV, 269-274). ADDITIONAL HISTORICAL DISCUSSIONS. J. J. Lalor, Cyclo- paedia, II, 626, III, 996 ; N. Sargent, Public Men and Events, I, 35-41, 56-74, 137, 141-146, 151-349; H. A. Wise, Seven Decades, chs. v-vii ; C. W. Young, American Statesman, chs. xxxiii-xxxviii ; L. M. Salmon, Appointing Power, 54-66; S. H. Gay, Bryant's United States, IV, 291-315; A. Brad- ford, Federal Government, chs. xiii, xiv; J. A. Stevens, Albert Gallatin, 368, 372, 373; A. C. McLaughlin, Lewis Cass, ch. v; T. K. Lothrop, William Henry Seward, 15-20; G. T. Curtis, Daniel Webster, I, chs. xvi-xx ; A. Kendall, Andrew Jackson; P. A. Goodwin, Andrew Jackson; W. Cobbett, Andrew Jackson. SOURCES. Congressional Globe, 23, 24 Congs. (1833-1837) ; T. H. Benton, Abridgment, X-XIII; J. D. Richardson, Mes- sages, II, 436-458, III, 1-308; W. MacDonald, Select Docu- ments, Nos. 46, 50-52, 54, 55, 57, 62, 64, 65 ; American History Leaflets, No. 24 ; Contemporaries, III, 158-164; C. A. Davis, Letters of J. Downing 1 Major / J. Q. Adams, Memoirs, VIII-X ; D. Webster, Works, I, 242, 267, 292, 345, 360, 364, 421, II, 11, 12, 315, 585, III, 416. IV, 103, 351, 477 ; C. Colton, Private Correspondence of Henry Clay 168 CONSTITUTIONAL PAPERS [ (Henry Clay, Works, IV), chs. vii-xi ; C. Colton, Life and Times of Henry Clay, I, II; A. Kendall, Autobiography, chs. xii-xv ; B. P. Poore, Perley's Reminiscences, I, chs. vi, vii, x- xiii; J. Quincy, Figures of the Past, 352-375. SPECIMEN QUESTIONS. Did Jackson's democracy coincide with Jefferson's? Did Jackson believe that the President could construe the Constitution contrary to a decision of the Supreme Court? Was Jackson responsible for the spoils system in national politics? Was Jackson an advocate of the smallest possible action of national government? 49. Paper No. 18. Civil Service. BIBLIOGRAPHY. Handbook, 19^, 2lg, 48, 108; Guide, 157, 167, 181; Brookings and Ringwalt, Briefs for Debate, No. xvii. CONSTITUTIONAL DISCUSSIONS. L. M. Salmon, Appointing Power ; J. Story, Commentaries, 1524-1559; H. Von Hoist, Constitutional Law, 58 ; J. N. Pomeroy, Constitutional Law, 180, 642-6G1; W. O. Bateman, Political and Con- stitutional Law, 295; J. R. Tucker, Constitution, 357- 359; H. C. Black, Constitutional Law, 110-114; T. M. Cooley, Constitutional Law, (ed. 1880) 104, 105, (ed. 1891) 107, 108, (ed. 1898) 118, 119; J. D. Andrews, American Law, 429, 430. ADDITIONAL CONSTITUTIONAL DISCUSSIONS. G. M. Lam- phere, United States Government, 264-276 ; W. Rawle, View of the Constitution, ch. xiv ; J. Schouler, Constitutional Studies, 165, 166; C. H. Kerr, United States Senate, 104- 135. CASES. Wood v. United States (1882): 107 U. S., 414. United States v. Ferreira (1851): 13 Howard, 40; 19 Curtis, 373; J. B. Thayer, Cases, 160. Ex parte Hennen (1839): 13 Peters, 230; 13 Curtis, 135. Blake v. U. S. (1880): 48,49] CIVIL SERVICE 169 103 U. S., 227; E. McClain, Cases, 610. U. S. v. Germaine (1878): 99 U. S., 508; E. McClain, Cases, 607. U. S. v. Perkins (1886) : 116 U. S., 483. Crenshaw v. U. S. (1890) : 134 U. S., 99. U. S. v. Hartwell (1867) : 6 Wallace, 385. Gratiot v. U. S. (1865) : 1 Court of Claims, 258. Opinions of Attorneys General, III, 188. HISTORICAL DISCUSSIONS. J. J. Lalor, Cyclopedia, III, 565-569; L. M. Salmon, The Appointing Power; J. N. Corn- stock, Civil Service in the United States ; W. G. Sumner, Andrew Jackson, 145-149 ; T. H. Benton, Thirty Tears' View, I, 159- 163 ; J. Parton, Andrew Jackson, III, 206-227 ; G. T. Curtis, Constitutional History, II, 142-145 ; W. M. Meigs, Growth of the Constitution, 224-229 ; B. Harrison, This Country of Ours, 99-112, 296-298; G. Cleveland, Independence of the Executive (Atlantic Monthly, LXXXV, 721, LXXXVI, 1) ; F. J. Good- now, Comparative Administrative Law, II, 2746, 97100; C. R. Fish, Removals of Officials by the Presidents of the United States (Amer. Hist. Assoc., Annual Report for 1899, I, 67-86); J. Bryce, American Commonwealth, II, ch. Ixv. SOURCES. Constitution of the United States, Art. I, Sect. 3, 3; Sect. 5,- 1 ; Sect. 6, 2; Sect. 8, 9, 16, 18; Art. II, Sect. 2, 2, 3; Sect. 3; Art. Ill, Sect. 1; Art. VI, 2. The Federalist, (Dawson ed.) No. 76, (Ford ed.) pp. 463, 505, 517. Tenure of Office Act: Statutes at Large, III, 582; W. MacDonald, Select Documents, No. 42. J. D. Richardson, Messages, III, 42, 53, IV, 492, 622, VIII, 375. A. Kendall, Autobiography, 297-317; J. Q. Adams, Memoirs, VIII, 112, 138, 144, 150,172, 179; Contemporaries, IV, 199. House Reports, 52 Cong., 1 sess. (1892), No. 1669. Debates on executive patronage, in Niles's Register, XLVIII, 384-392. Reports of the United States Civil Service Commission (annual since 1884). SPECIMEN QUESTIONS. May Congress require the head of a 170 CONSTITUTIONAL PAPERS [ department to state his reasons for a removal ? May Con- gress create an office to be held during good behavior? May Congress require the President to appoint only persons who have passed a competitive examination? May Congress by statute appoint specified persons to any office? 50. Paper No. 19. Interposition and Nullification. BIBLIOGRAPHY. Handbook, 19#, 21a, 21e, 34, 57; Guide r 156, 183, 205. CONSTITUTIONAL DISCUSSIONS. H. Von Hoist, United States? I, 396-408 ; A. H. Stephens, War between the States, I, 335-342,, 422-430; R. Foster, Commentaries, 32-34; D. F. Houston, Nullification / G. T. Curtis, Constitutional History, II, 5, 15-40; H. C. Black, Constitutional Law, 22-33 ; J. Davis, Confederate Government, I, 184, 221, 222; J. Story, Commentaries, 306- 340, 350-372; J. N. Pomeroy, Constitutional Law, 25-44> 93-133 ; E. P. Powell, Nullification and Secession. ADDITIONAL CONSTITUTIONAL DISCUSSIONS. J. I. C. Hare r Constitutional Law, I, 30, 134 ; T. H. Benton, Thirty Tears' View, I, 334-362; D. Webster, Works, III, 448, 464; C. B. Loring, Nullification and Secession. CASES. Lane County v. Oregon (1868) : 7 Wallace, 71, 76 ;. E. McClain, Cases, 40. Texas v. White (1868): 7 Wallace, 700; J. B. Tlmyer, Cases, 302; E. McClaiu, Cases, 838; C. E. Boyd, Cases, 552. Legal Tender Cases (1872): 12 Wallace, 457, 554. McCulloch v. Maryland (1819): 4 Wheaton, 316; 4 Curtis, 415; C. E. Boyd, Cases, 308; J. B. Thayer, Cases, 271 ; E. McClain, Cases, 1. HISTORICAL DISCUSSIONS. H. Von Hoist, John C. Calhoun, 96-103; J. J. Lalor, Cyclopedia, II, 234, 1050-1055, III^ 734; T. H. Benton, Thirty Years' View, I, 138-149, 167-180, 297-299; T. Roosevelt, Thomas H. Benton, 88-105; N. Sar- geant, Public Men and Events, I, 169-174 ; H. C. Lodge, Daniel 49,50] INTERPOSITION AND NULLIFICATION 171 Webster, 171-204; G. T. Curtis, Daniel Webster, I, 351-366; J. Schouler, United States, III, 482-488 ; H. A. Wise, Seven Decades, 121-135; J. W. Draper, Civil War, I, 370-380; F. M. Anderson, Contemporary Opinion of the Virginia and Ken- tucky Resolutions (American Historical Review, V, 45-63, 225- 252); E. G. Scott, Reconstruction during Civil War, 3, 192- 205; P. L. Ford, The Federalist, lOOw, 129ra; J. W. Burgess, Middle Period, ch. x ; J. S. Landon, Constitutional History, 187-198. SOURCES. Constitution of the United States, Preamble ; Art. I, Sect. 2, 4; Sect. 4, 1; Sect. 8, 15 ; Sect. 10; Art. Ill, Sect. 2, 23 ; Sect. 3, 1 ; Art. IV ; Art. VI ; Amends. X; XI. Hayne's speech: Congressional Debates, 21 Cong., 1 sess. (1830), VI, 43-58; A. Johnston, American Orations, I, 213-227; T. H. Benton, Abridgment, X, 423-449. Webster's reply: Congressional Debates, 21 Cong., 1 sess. (1830), VI, 58- 80 ; A. Johnston, American Orations, I, 228-282 ; D. Webster, Works, III, 270-342, 449-505; comments on Webster's reply, in A. H. Stephens, War between the States, I, 298-355. Extracts from the two speeches : W. MacDonald, Select Documents, Nos. 47-49; Contemporaries, 159. Calhoun's South Carolina exposition, in Works, VI, 1-58 ; Calhoun's speech against Webster, in A. Johnston, American Orations, I, 196-212. Ex- tracts from Webster, Calhoun, and Hayne, in American History Leaflets, No. 30; Contemporaries, III, 161. J. Madison, Writings, IV. 18-20, 44, 80, 102, 196, 224. Documents in Niles's Register, XLIII, Suppl. Ordinance of Nullification : H. W. Preston, Documents, 300-303 ; Niles's Register, XLIII, Suppl. ; W. MacDonald, Select Documents, No. 53. Jackson's proclamation to the people of South Carolina: J. D. Richard- son, Messages, II, 640-656 ; Niles's Register, XLIII, 260-264 ; W. MacDonald, Select Documents, No. 55. Letters on the Nullification Movement (American History Review, VI, 725-765, 172 CONSTITUTIONAL PAPERS [ VII, 92-119). The Federalist (Ford ed.), 100-102, 140, 173, 203. SPECIMEN QUESTIONS. May Congress under any circum- stance annul a State statute? Is it treasonable to refuse obedience to an act of Congress? May a State constitution- ally refuse to observe a national statute which has been held unconstitutional by the State Supreme Court? May Congress compel a State court to permit an appeal to the United States Supreme Court? 51. Paper No. 20. Constitutional Status of Slavery. BIBLIOGRAPHY. Handbook, 19#, 197*; Guide, 152, 161, 177, 188, 189, 196-199, 202. CONSTITUTIONAL DISCUSSIONS. J. Story, Commentaries (4th and 5th eds.), 1915-1927 ; T. M. Cooley, Constitutional Law, (ed. 1880) 213-217, (ed. 1891) 222-225, (ed. 1898) 233-240; R. Foster, Commentaries, 158-163 ; J. R. Tucker, Constitution, II, 554, 555, 629-634; J. Kent, Commentaries, II, 251-258; T. Walker, American Law, 182-187. ADDITIONAL CONSTITUTIONAL DISCUSSIONS. J. N. Pome- roy, Constitutional Law, 116-118; F. Wharton, Commen- taries, 181, 182; H. C. Black, Constitutional Law, 202; J. C. Hurd, Law of Freedom and Bondage, I, ch. xii-xvi, II, ch. xxv-xxxi; T. R. R. Cobb, Law of Negro Slavery, 116-225. CASES. Dred Scott v. Sandford (1857): 19 Howard, 393; 2 Miller, 1 ; J. B. Thayer, Cases, 480 ; American History Leaf- lets, No. 23 ; C. E. Boyd, Cases, 471 ; W. MacDonald, Select Documents, No. 91. Prigg v. Pennsylvania (1842) : 16 Peters, 539; 14 Curtis, 417; J. B. Thayer, Cases, 476. Kentucky v. Dennison (1860): 24 Howard, 66; 4 Miller, 10; J. B. Thayer, Cases, 195w. Lemmon v. the People (1860) : 20 New York Reports, 562 ; J. B. Thayer, Cases, 496. State v. Mann 50,51] SLAVERY 173 (1829) : 2 Der. (N. C.), 263 ; J. B. Thayer, Cases, 473. Jones v. Van Zandt (1843) : Federal Cases, No. 7501. Robertsons Bald- win (1897) : 165 U. S., 275 ; E. McClain, Cases, 891. Strader v. Graham (1850): 10 Howard, 82; 18 Curtis, 305. Com- monwealth v. Ares (1836) : 18 Pickering (Mass.), 193. Smith v. Smith (1839) : 13 Louisiana Reports, 444 ; T. D. Woolsey, International Law, 113, 114. Louis v. Cabarrus (1834): 7 Louisiana Reports, 170. Lagrange v. Choteau (1828): 2 Missouri Reports, 19. Ralph v. Duncan (1833): 3 Missouri Reports, 140. Thomas v. Generis (1840): 16 Louisiana Reports, 483; T. D. Woolsey, International Law, 113, 114. Case of the Creole (1841) : T. D. Woolsey, International Law, 114 ; H. Wheaton, International Law, (Boyd ed.) 103^, (Dana ed.) 165 ; F. Wharton, Digest, 38. Somersett Case (1772) : Lofft's Reports, 18 ; J. C. Hurd, Law of Freedom and Bondage, I, 189-194; J. B. Thayer, Cases, 500, 501. Case of Slave Grace (1827) : 2 Haggard's Admiralty Reports, 94 ; H. Wheaton, International Law (Boyd ed.), 133or. HISTORICAL DISCUSSIONS. J. F. Rhodes, United States, I, ch. i ; H. Greeley, American Conflict, I, chs. i-xviii ; J. Davis, Confederate Government, I, chs. i, ii. v ; J. Schouler, United States, I, 143-150, II, 57-59, 125-130, III, 133-173, IV, 203- 224, Y, 195-199, 376-381; H. Von Hoist, United States, I, chs. vii-ix, II, chs. ii, iv, III, chs. xvi, VI, ch. i; E. A. Pollard, Lost Cause, chs. i-iv ; G. T. Curtis, Constitutional History, II, 201-226, 231-299; J. W. Burgess, Middle Period, chs. iii, xi, xviii, xxi ; J. J. Lalor, Cydopcedia, III, 725-738 ; J. B. Mc- Master, United States, III, 515-527, V, 184-226; C. Schurz, Henry Clay, chs. viii, xvii, xxi, xxvi; A. B. Hart, Salmon P. Chase, chs. iii, v, x; J. W. Draper, Civil War, I, chs. xvii, xix, xxvi; T. R. R. Cobb, Historical Sketch of Slavery, chs. ix-xi, xiii-xviii; W. H. Siebert, Underground Railroad; S. W. Mc- Call, Thaddeus Stevens, 72-88, 129-135, 210-228; T. K. Loth- 174 CONSTITUTIONAL PAPERS [ rop, W. H. Seward, chs. iv, v, vii, x; J. S. Landon, Constitu- tional History, ch. xi. SOURCES. Constitution of the United States, Preamble; Art. I, Sect. 2, 1 ; Sect. 3; Sect. 8, 1, 3, 4, 10, 17, 18; Sect. 9, 1, 4; Sect. 10, 2 ; Art. Ill, Sect. 2, 1, 3; Art. IV; Amends. V-X ; XIII-XV. Contemporaries, III, 174-184, IV, 15-22, 29-33, 41-48, 124-131; Source-Book, 91, 94, 97, 101, 106, 110, 113; W. MacDonald, Select Documents, Nos. 4, 35-40, 69, 78, 82, 85, 93, 96 ; G. M. Stroud, Slave Laws; A. Johnston, American Orations (Woodburn ed.), II, 3-343, IV, 1-195. SPECIMEN QUESTIONS. Was the Federal government bound to take cognizance of the existence of slavery in some of the States? Did vessels sailing from southern ports with slaves on board carry with them the State laws on slavery ? Could the government of the United States legally hold slaves? Was the slave of an ambassador of the United States free, if brought by his master into a free State? 52. Paper No. 21. Right of Expression of Opinion. BIBLIOGRAPHY. Handbook, Wh, 21, 40; Guide, 188. CONSTITUTIONAL DISCUSSIONS. J. Story, Commentaries, 1880-1895; H. Von Hoist, Constitutional Law, 75, 76 ; H. C. Black, Constitutional Law, 540-560; J. R. Tucker, Constitution, II, 326; J. W. Burgess, Political Science, I, 190-193; F. Wharton, Commentaries, 555, 556 ; T. M. Cooley, Constitu- tional Law, (ed. 1891) 278-281, 283-293, (ed. 1898), 294-297, 299-309; W. Rawle, View of the Constitution, 123, 124; A. V. Dicey, Law of the Constitution, 139-141. CASES. United States v. Cruikshank (1875) : 92 U. S., 542; E. McClain, Cases, 31. Davis v. Massachusetts (1897): 167 U. S., 43. Ex parte Jackson (1877) : 96 U. S., 727; E. McClaiu, Cases, 478. In re Rapier (1892): 143 U. S., 110; 51, 52] EXPRESSION OF OPINION 175 E. McClain, Cases, 478 ; J. B. Thayer, Oases, 732. Preston v. Finley (1896) : 72 Federal Reporter, 850. HISTORICAL DISCUSSIONS. H. Yon Hoist, United States, II, 111-146, 236-267, 284-289, 467-484; G. T. Curtis, James Buchanan, I, 319-357 ; Garrisons, William Lloyd Garrison, I, 238-249; H. Von Hoist, John C. Calhoun, 124-150, 165-184; H. Greeley, American Conflict, I, 143-146 ; H. Wilson, Slave Power, I, 307-343, 394-403, 423-427; J. Schouler, United States, IV, 216-229 ; J. T. Morse, John Quincy Adams, 243-262, 506-308; J. J. Lalor, Cyclopedia, III, 167-169; G. P. Julian, Joshua R. Giddings, 51, 116-125 ; A. B. Hart, Salmon P. Chase, 37-39; J. W. Burgess, Middle Period, 253-296; S. G. Fisher, .Evolution of the Constitution, 206, 207. SOURCES. Constitution of the United States, Art. I, Sect. 5, 1, 2; Art. VI, 3; Amends. I; IX; X. J. Q. Adams, Memoirs, IX, 350, XI, 109. Jackson's message of Dec. 8, 1835: Statesman's Manual, II, 911, 912; Congressional Globe, 24 Cong., 1 sess. (1835), 10 ; J. D. Richardson, Messages, III, 175. Calhoun's report of Feb. 4, 1836, in Works, V, 190-208. T. H. Benton, Abridgment, XII, 705-711, 752-759, 771. Amos Kendall's correspondence, in Niks' s Register, XLIX, 7-9. -T. H. Benton, Thirty Tears' View, I, 574-588,610-624. Gag resolutions : H. Greeley, American Conflict, I, 143-147 ; T. H. Benton, Abridgment, XIII, 24-29, 557-572, 702-707 Debates on the censure of John Quincy Adams : T. H. Benton, Abridgment, XIII, 266-299; Contemporaries, III, 184. SPECIMEN QUESTIONS. Is it a right of a citizen of the United States to have his petition to Congress read in the House where it is presented? Can the United States refuse to deliver mail on suspicion that it contains unmailable matter? May Con- gress exclude specified classes of petitions from the treatment accorded to other petitions ? May either House of Congress forbid all of its members to speak on a pending question ? 176 CONSTITUTIONAL PAPERS [ 53. Paper No. 22. Ethics of the Mexican War. BIBLIOGRAPHY. Handbook, Wh, 20a ; Guide, 193, 194. HISTORICAL DISCUSSIONS. H. Von Hoist, United States. Ill, chs. iii-xii; E. G. Bourne, Essays in Historical Criticism, No. ix ; H. Von Hoist, John C. Calhoun, ch. iv ; C. Scburz, Henry Clay, II, ch. xxv ; J. Winsor, Narrative and Critical History, VII, 292, 408-412, 505-507; H. C. Lodge, Daniel Webster, 290-294; H. Greeley, American Conflict, \, ch. xiv ; J. J. Lalor, Cyclopaedia, III, 109; J. F. Rhodes, United States, I, 87-94; J. Schouler, United States, IV, 518-543, V, 1-84 ; Nicolay and Hay, Abra- ham Lincoln, I, chs. xiv, xv ; J. G. Elaine, Twenty Years of Congress, I, ch. iv; J. H. Patton, Democratic Party, 122-130. ADDITIONAL HISTORICAL DISCUSSIONS. G. T. Curtis, Daniel Webster, II, 290-293, 301-307; G. T. Curtis, James Buchanan, I, ch. xxi; H. Wilson, Slave Power, II, chs. ii, iii; H. H. Ban- croft, Pacific States, VIII, ch. xiii ; S. H. Gay, Bryant's United States, IV, 369-384; W. Jay, Review of the Mexican War; A. A. Livermore, War with Mexico Reviewed J. S. Jenkins, James Knox Polk, ch. ix; A. W. Young, American Statesman, chs. Ixvi, Ixvii; L. B. Chase, Polk Administration, chs. v-ix; P. Young,, History of Mexico, book vii, chs. i, v; histories of the Mexican War by R. S. Ripley, E. D. Mansfield, L. Moody, C. M. Wil- cox, N. C. Brooks, A. C. Ramsey, and J. S. Jenkins. SOURCES. Congressional Globe, 29 Cong., 30 Cong. (1845-49) ; T. H. Benton, Abridgment, XV, XVI; Congressional Docu- ments, 1845-49, especially Senate Docs., 29 Cong., 1 sess., I, No. 1, VII, No. 337, VIII, No. 388, 29 Cong., 2 sess., Ill, No. 107, 30 Cong.. 1 sess., VII, Nos. 52, 60 ; House Exec. Docs., 29 Cong., 1 sess., VI, No. 196, 29 Cong., 2 sess., Ill, No. 19, 30 Cong., 1 sess., II, No. 8, VIII, No. 69; J. D. Richardson, Messages, IV, 437-460; T. H. Benton, Thirty Years' View, I, chs. cxlix, clxi ; Source- Book, 104; Contemporaries, IV, 7-14; J. R. Lowell, Biglow Papers ; J. C. Calhoun, Works, IV; 53, 54] POPULAR SOVEREIGNTY 177 D. Webster, Works, V, 151, 253-301 ; J. Q. Adams, Memoirs, XII; U. S. Grant, Personal Memoirs, I, chs. iii-xiii; B. P. Poore, Perley's Reminiscences, I, ch. xxv; N. Sargent, Public Men and Events, II, ch. vii. SPECIMEN QUESTIONS. Was war begun by the act of Mexico? Was the failure of the Slidell mission a sufficient reason for war ? Was the conquest of California a reason- able incident of war against Mexico? Were the unsettled claims a sufficient reason for war ? 54. Paper No. 23. Popular Sovereignty. BIBLIOGRAPHY. Handbook, 19A, 42; Guide, 199. CONSTITUTIONAL DISCUSSIONS. H. Von Hoist, United States, III, 354-358, IV, 291-402, especially 381-389; G. T. Curtis, Constitutional History, II, 259, 260, 280, 281, 296, 297; J. W. Burgess, Civil War and the Constitution, 1, 19-21, 24 ; R.Foster, Commentaries, I, 163; A. H. Stephens, War between the States, II, 131-135, 248-262 ; R. Johnson, Remarks on Popular Sov- ereignty; J. Story, Commentaries, 1322-1330. CASES. American Insurance Co. v. Canter (1828) : 1 Peters, 511; 7 Curtis, 685; J. B. Thayer, Cases, 350; C. E. Boyd, Cases, 583 ; E. McClain, Cases, 827 ; J. Marshall, Writings, 373. _ Dred Scott v. Sandford (1857) : 19 Howard, 393 ; 2 Miller, 1 ; J. B. Thayer, Cases, 480 (especially the dissenting opinions of J. J. McLean and Curtis). National Bank v. County of Yankton (1879): 101 U. S., 129; E. McClain, Cases, 830rc. Clinton v. Englebrecht (1871): 13 Wallace, 434. Murphy v. Ramsey (1885): 114 U. S., 15. Mormon Church v. United States (1890) : 136 U. S., 1 ; E. McClain, Cases, 835. HISTORICAL DISCUSSIONS. H. Von Hoist, United States, IV, 280-461; J. F. Rhodes, United States, I, 419-498; W. T. Young, General Cass, 302, 321, 325, 363, 371; A. C. Mc- 12 178 CONSTITUTIONAL PAPERS [ Laughlin, Lewis Cass, 235-239, 272-276, 294-296, 326 ; W. Wilson, Division and Reunion, 81-90 ; H. Greeley, American Conflict, I, 224-236 ; J. S. Landon, Constitutional History, 234- 245; J. Schouler, United States, V, 280-289; J. J. Lalor, Cyclopaedia, III, 281-284; T. Roosevelt, Thomas H. Benton, 349, 352 ; H. Wilson, Slave Power, II, ch. xxx. SOURCES. Constitution of the United States, Art. I, Sect. 8, 17, 18 ; Art. IV, Sect. 3, 2 ; Art. VI, 2 ; Amend. XIII. - Leake's proposition of Feb. 17, 1847, in Congressional Globe, 29 Cong., 2 sess. (1847), 444. Dickinson's resolution of Dec. 14, 1847, in Congressional Globe, 30 Cong., 1 sess. (1847), 21, 27, 54, 157-160. Cass' Nicholson letter of Dec. 24, 1847 : A. C. McLaughlin, Lewis Cass, 232, 233 ; M. W. McClusky, Political Text-book of 1860, 462-465. Douglas' report of Jan. 4, 1854: Senate Reports, 33 Cong., 1 sess. (1854), I, No. 15; American History Leaflets, No. 17 ; W. MacDonald, Select Docu- ments, No. 85 (see also Nos. 86, 87). Appeal of the Inde- pendent Democrats, Jan. 19, 1854: Congressional Globe, 33 Cong., 1 sess. (1854), 281, 282; American History Leaflets, No. 17. S. A. Douglas, in A. Johnston, American Orations, II, 218-255, III, 17-27. S. P. Chase: Congressional Globe, 33 Cong., 1 sess. (1854), App. 133-140 ; A. Johnston, American Orations, II, 183-212. Charles Sumner, in A. Johnston, Ameri- can Orations, II, 212-218. Jefferson Davis, Resolutions of May 24, 1860, in Congressional Globe, 36 Cong., 1 sess. (1860), 2310-2335. Contemporaries, IV, 34-40, 44, 66; Source- Book, 108. SPECIMEN QUESTIONS. Would a territorial law prohibiting the entry of free negroes have been valid under Douglas' doctrine of popular sovereignty ? Could a territory, in con- formity with Douglas' doctrine of popular sovereignty, have prohibited the sale of slaves brought from other parts of the Union ? Under the principles of popular sovereignty should 54, 55] RIGHTS OF ALIENS 179 the people have elected their own governor ? Did the doctrine of popular sovereignty logically give to the people of the territories control of the public lands? 55. Paper No. 24. Rights of Indians, Aliens, Chinese, and Negroes. BIBLIOGRAPHY. Handbook, 19^, 19A, 20i, 216, 40, 65,80, 87, 98, 119 ; Guide, 179, 185 ; Brookings and Ringwalt, Briefs for Debate, Nos. ii, iii, xxviii. CONSTITUTIONAL DISCUSSIONS. J. Story, Commentaries (4th and 5th eds.), 1097-1101, 1102-1104, 1697-1701, 1928- 1975; H. C. Black, Constitutional Law, 140, 207-210, 340, 464- 470, 527, 528 ; H. Von Hoist, Constitutional Law, 73, 136-139, 251-262 ; J. R. Tucker, Constitution, 552, 553, 558, 559, 732, 796, 797 ; C. F. Randolph, Law and Policy of Annexation, 57- 59, 63-76 ; G. F. Canfield, Legal Status of Indians (American Law Review, XV, 21) ; T. M. Cooley, Constitutional Law, (ed. 1880) 68, 77, 78, 205-244; (ed. 1891) 79,213-251,253-255; (ed. 1898) 88, 89, 224-263, 268-293 ; W. O. Bateman, Political and Constitutional Law, 155-160, 164-166; S. F. Miller, Constitutional Law, 276-308, 401-412, 425, 426, 469-473 ; F. Wharton, Commentaries, 261-266, 431-436, 584-594; J. Tiffany, Treatise in Government, 378, 379, 380-392; H. Brannon, Fourteenth Amendment, chs. i, iv, vii-xii ; A. P. Morse, in Harvard Law Review, XIV, 262. ADDITIONAL CONSTITUTIONAL DISCUSSIONS. T. Walker, Amer- ican Law, 53, 54; J. I. C. Hare, Constitutional Law, 516, 517; J. Bryce, American Commonwealth, II, 327; J. C. Hurd, Law of Freedom and Bondage, ch. xxxii ; J. D. Andrews, American Law, 234, 589-630 ; C. E. Boyd, in Nation, LXVII, 10 ; C. S. Patterson, The United States and the States, ch. xi. CASES. Worcester v. Georgia (1832): 6 Peters, 515; 10 Curtis, 214; J. B. Thayer, Cases, 583 ; C. E. Boyd, Cases, 590. 180 CONSTITUTIONAL PAPERS [ Elk v. Wilkins (1884): 112 U. S., 94; J. B. Thayer, Cases, 587 ; F. Snow, Cases and Opinions, 230 ; E. McClain, Cases, 969. United States v. Kagama (1886): 118 U. S., 375; J. B. Thayer, Cases, 591; F. Snow, Cases and Opinions, 233. United States v. Holliday (1865): 3 Wallace, 407; J. B. Thayer, Cases, 731, 1909 ; E. McClain, Cases, 270. Tick Wo v. Hopkins (1886) : 118 U. S., 356; J. B. Thayer, Cases, 774; E. McClain, Cases, 917. In re Lee Sing (1890): 43 Federal Reporter, 359 ; J. B. Thayer, Cases, 861. In re Look Tin Sing (1884) : 21 Federal Reporter, 905 ; J. B. Thayer, Cases, 578; Gee Fook Sing v. United States (1892): 49 Federal Reporter, 146; 7 U. S. Appeals, 27. United States v. Wong Kim Ark (1898): 169 U. S., 649; C. E. Boyd, Cases, 551; E. McClain, Cases, 964. Carlisle v. United States (1872): 16 Wallace, 147. Smith v. Turner (1848): 7 Howard, 283; 17 Curtis, 122. Strauder v. West Virginia (1879) : 100 U. S., 303; J. B. Thayer, Cases, 551. Ex parte Virginia (1879): 100 U. S., 339; J. B. Thayer, Cases, 548. Lehew v. Brum- mell (1890): 103 Missouri Reports, 546; J. B. Thayer, Cases, 574. United States v. Rhodes (1866): 1 Abbott, U. S., 28; J. B. Thayer, Cases, 506. SOURCES. Constitution of the United States, Art. I, Sect. 2, 1; Sect. 4, 1; Sect. 9, 2, 3 ; Sect. 10, 1; Art. Ill, Sects. 1, 2; Art. TV, Sect. 2, 1 ; Amends. I-XV. Contem- poraries, IV, 152, 155, 205, 208 ; Revised Statutes, 347-349, 378-380; Supplement to Revised Statutes, I, 68, 342, 458-461, 534, 556. HISTORICAL DISCUSSIONS. As in Paper No. 9. SPECIMEN QUESTIONS. May an alien vote for Presidential electors? May a Chinaman be naturalized as a citizen of the United States? Is a negro citizen of Massachusetts entitled to the privileges of white citizens in South Carolina? May a man be deprived of suffrage because his grandfather was a slave ? 55, 56] JOHN BRO WN'S CAREER 181 56. Paper No. 25. Ethics of John Brown's Career. BIBLIOGRAPHY. Handbook, 19; Guide, 200, 202. HISTORICAL DISCUSSIONS. J. F. Rhodes, United States, II, 383-416; J. Schouler, United States, V, 437-444; H. Von Hoist, United States, VII, ch. i; H. Von Hoist, John Brown; J. J. Lalor, Cyclopedia, I, 310; J. G. Elaine, Twenty Tears of Congress, I, 154-157; S. H. Gay, Bryant's United States, IV, ch. xvi ; J. W. Burgess, Civil War and the Constitution, I, 37-43 ; J. E. Chamberlin, John Brown ; W. E. Connelly, John Brown ; M. J. Wright, Trial and Execution of John Brown (Amer. Hist. Assoc., Papers, IV, 121); R. J. Hinton, John Brown and his Men ; A. H. Stephens, War between the States, II, 258, 259, 269; Nicolay and Hay, Abraham Lincoln, III, ch. xi; R. D. Webb, Life and Letters of Captain John Brown ; Garrisons, William Lloyd Garrison, III, 417, 418, 440, 472, 474-493; J. N. Larned, History for Ready Reference, 3403 ; J. J. Ingalls, John Brown's Place in History (North American Review, CXXXVIII, 138-150). ADDITIONAL HISTORICAL DISCUSSIONS. H. Greeley, American Conflict, I, ch. xx ; H. Wilson, Slave Power, II, 587-600 ; J. S. Pike, First Blows of the Civil War, 445-452; J. Buchanan, Buchanan's Administration, 62-65 ; E. A. Pollard, Lost Cause, 70-74; G. L. Austin, Wendell Phillips, 180-192; O. B. Froth- ingham, Gerritt Smith, 234-237, 254, 255 ; D. S. Jordan, Story of the Innumerable Company, 186-201 ; O. P. Anderson, Voice from Harper's Ferry ; J. Redpath, Public Life of Captain John Brown ; J. Redpath, Echoes of Harper's Ferry ; A. B. Hart, Salmon P. Chase, 174-176; F. Bancroft, William H. Seward, I, 409, 495-498, II, 531 ; R. H. Gillet, Democracy in United States, 240-242 ; C. E. Norton, in Atlantic Monthly, V, 378. SOURCES. F. B. Sanborn, Life and Letters of John Brown ; F. B. Sanborn, Writings of H. D. 77/oram, X, 196-252; Ameri- can Anti-Slavery Society, Annual Report, 1860, 76-133 ; T. W. 182 CONSTITUTIONAL PAPERS [ Higginson, Cheerful Yesterdays, 196-234; Mason's report, in Senate Reports, 36 Cong., 1 sess. (1860), No. 278; Congressional Globe, 36 Cong., 1 sess. (1860) ; F. Douglass, Life and Times, 277-282, 306-308, 318-327 ; Contemporaries, IV, 47, 48, 85; A. K. McClure, Abraham Lincoln, 334-353. SPECIMEN QUESTIONS. Was John Brown a murderer ? Were the abolitionists responsible for the John Brown raid ? Was John Brown a traitor to the United States? Was John Brown justified in the death of the negro porter on the bridge? 57. Paper No. 26. Secession. BIBLIOGRAPHY. Handbook, 19^, 21, 2le, 34, 50; Guide* 204-208. CONSTITUTIONAL DISCUSSIONS. J. Story, Commentaries (4th and 5th eds.), 351-357, 467-481; H. Von Hoist, Constitu- tional Law, 12 ; W. O. Bateman, Political and Constitutional Law, 137-142 ; J. I. C. Hare, Constitutional Law, 64-93 ; J. Davis, Confederate Government, I, 184; G. T. Curtis, Consti- tutional History, II, 1-47, 80-83, 289-338; R. Foster, Com- mentaries, 11, 13-16, 19, 20, 26-32, 36; J. E. Tucker, Constitution, 171, 175; H. C. Black, Constitutional Law, 28-33 ; E. P. Powell, Nullification and Secession ; J. C. Ropes, Story of the Civil War, I, chs. i-iv. ADDITIONAL CONSTITUTIONAL DISCUSSIONS. C. B. Loring, Nullification and Secession ; J. L. M. Curry, Southern States and ^American Union, ch. x ; W. Rawle, View of the Constitution, 296, 297, 302, 303, 305, 306; T. M. Cooley, Constitutional Law, (ed. 1880) 26-29, (ed. 1891) 25-28, (ed. 1898) 27-30; J. C. Hard, Theory of Our National Existence, 88, 105, 145, 286 ; J. Buchanan, Buchanan's Administration, 86-98 ; F. Wharton, Commentaries, 374, 594rc. CASES. Texas v. White (1868): 7 Wallace, 700; J. B. Thayer, Cases, 302; C. E. Boyd, Cases , 552. White v. Hart 56, 57] SECESSION 183 (1871): 13 Wallace, 646; J. B. Thayer, Cases, 259. Keith v. Clark (1878) : 97 U. S., 454. Sprott v. United States (1874) : 20 Wallace, 459. Gimn v. Barry (1872) : 15 Wallace, 610. United States v. Keehler (1869): 9 Wallace, 83.- Hickman v. Jones (1869) : 9 Wallace, 197. Williams v. Bruffy (1877): 96 U. S., 176. HISTORICAL DISCUSSIONS. R. H. Dana, Wheaton's Interna- tional Law, note 32 ; J. F. Rhodes, United States, III ; G. T. Curtis, James Buchanan, II, ch. xv; J. T. Morse, Abraham Lincoln, I, ch. viii ; H. Greeley, American Conflict, I, ch. xxii ; J. J. Lalor, Cyclopaedia, III, 693-702; J. W. Draper, Civil War, I, chs. xxvii, xxviii ; T. S. Goodwin, Natural History of Secession, chs. xxvi, xxvii ; Comte de Paris, Civil War in America, I, 113-116; E. A. Pollard, Lost Cause, 84-86; J. Davis, Confederate Government, I, 70-77, 168-177, 185-192 ; J. G. Blaine, Twenty Tears of Congress, I, chs. x, xi; J. Schouler, United States, V, ch. xiv ; S. S. Cox, Three Decades, 101-108; H. Wilson, Slave Power, III, 1-10, 109-126; M. M. Granger, Washington versus Jefferson, ch. v; S. W. McCall, Thaddeus Stevens, 115-130; J. W. Burgess, Civil War and the Constitution, I, ch. iv. SOURCES. Constitution of the United States, Preamble ; Art. I, Sect. 8, 1, 10-18; Art. Ill, Sects. 2, 3; Art. IV, Sect. 4; Art. VI, 2 ; Amends. IX; X; XIV. Ordinances of secession and other documents, in American History Leaflets, No. 12. Lincoln's inaugural address and first message to Congress : American History Leaflets, No. 18 ; J. D. Richard- son, Messages, VI, 5, 20; A. Lincoln, Works, II, 1, 55.- Ordinances of ratification (1789-1790): P. C. Centz, Republic of Republics, 523-528 ; W. Hickey, The Constitution, ch. iv ; J. Elliot, Debates, V, 319-335. Contemporary speeches, in A. Johnston, American Orations, II, 46-135, III, 49-124. Southern arguments, in A. H. Stephens, War between the States, 184 CONSTITUTIONAL PAPERS [ I, 17-49, 441-452, 495-539, II, 5-15, 26-34, 263-271 ; J. Davis, Confederate Government, I, 168-176; Contemporaries, IV, 53-55, 62. Contemporary documents, Annual Cyclo- pedia (1861-1865); E. McPherson, Political History of the Re- bellion; Pike, First Mows of the Civil War; W. MacDonald, Select Documents, Nos. 32, 94, 97 ; Contemporaries, III, 123, IV, 56, 61. SPECIMEN QUESTIONS. Had Texas any greater constitu- tional right of secession than South Carolina ? Granting the right of secession, did Fort Sumter revert to South Carolina? Did seceding States carry with them privileges gained by United States treaties? Did Virginia reserve a right of secession in 1788? 58. Paper No. 27. Responsibility for the Civil War. BIBLIOGRAPHY. Handbook, 19z, 19;; Guide, 203, 206- 209. HISTORICAL DISCUSSIONS. H. Von Hoist, United States, III, 315, 316, VII, chs. vii-xi; J. F. Rhodes, United States, III, chs. xiii, xiv ; G. T. Curtis, Constitutional History, II, ch. x ; J. W. Burgess, Civil War and the Constitution, I, chs. iv-vii; H. Greeley, American Conflict, I, chs. xxiii-xxv ; Goldwin Smith, United States, 221-254 ; J. Schouler, United States, V, ch. xxii ; F. Bancroft, Final Efforts at Compromise (Political Science Quarterly, VI, 401-423) ; S. Webster, Responsibility for Secession (Political Science Quarterly, VIII, 268-286) ; J. G. Nicolay, Outbreak of the Rebellion, chs. i-v ; A. B. Hart, Salmon P. Chase, chs. vii, viii ; G. Lunt, Origin of the War, chs. xii, xiii, xvi, xvii, xix, xx ; J. R. Lowell, Political Essays, 118-152; J. T. Morse, Abraham Lincoln, chs. vii, viii ; J. G. Blaine, Twenty Tears of Congress, chs. i, x-xii ; H. Wilson, Slave Power, III, chs. i-vii ; A. H. Stephens, War between the States, 57, 58] RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE CIVIL WAR 185 II, coll. xiii ; J. C. Ropes, Story of the Civil War, I, chs. i-v ; J. E. Oairnes, Slave Power, ch. i ; M. M. Granger, Washington v. Jefferson, ch. iv. ADDITIONAL HISTORICAL DISCUSSIONS. J. W. Draper, Civil War, I, book ii, chs. i, iii ; S. S. Cox, Three Decades, 51, 65-68, 77-80, 219, 220; J. L. Motley, Causes of the Civil War (Living Age, LXX, 9-21) ; Nicolay and Hay, Abraham Lincoln, II, chs. xvii-xxix, III; T. K. Lothrop, William H. Seward, chs. xii, xiii ; R. Johnson, Short History of the War, ch. i ; G. T. Curtis, James Buchanan, II, chs. xv-xxiv ; J. Davis, Confederate Gov- ernment, parts iii, iv, ch. i ; A. K. McClure, Abraham Lincoln, 297-311; C. Coleman, John J. Crittenden, II, chs. xiii-xv; H. C. Fletcher, American War, I, chs. i-iii ; J. N. Larned, History for Ready Reference, V, 3405-3422. SOURCES. Congressional Globe, 36 Cong., 2 sess. (1860- 1861) passim, especially 1114 (Crittenden's plan), 794 (Vallan- digham's), 1254 (Peace Conference), 690 (Kellog's), 283,379 (Clark's) ; Senate Exec. Docs., 36 Cong., 2 sess. (1861), IV, No. 2 (Message of Feb. 19) ; Senate Reports, 36 Cong., 2 sess. (1861), No. 288 (Committee of 13) ; House Miscellaneous, 36 Cong., 2 sess. ; House Reports, 36 Cong., 2 sess. (1861), I, No. 31 (Committee of 33); Opinions of Attorneys General, IX, 522- 526 (Black); American Annual Cyclopaedia (1861), 166-225 (Congress), 562-568 (Peace Conference) ; L. E. Chittenden, Reports of the Debates and Proceedings of the Conference Conven- tion ; Official Journal of the Conference Convention ; A. Lincoln's First Inaugural and Messages : J. D. Richardson, Messages, VI, 5-12, 20-31, 44-58 ; Works, II, 1-7, 55-66, 93-106 ; Con- temporaries, IV, 49-74; W. MacDonald, Select Documents, Nos. 93-96 ; American History Leaflets, Nos. 18, 26. SPECIMEN QUESTIONS. Would different behavior by the abolitionists have prevented the Civil War? Could James Buchanan have prevented the war? Was Jefferson Davis a 186 CONSTITUTIONAL PAPERS [ traitor previous to the secession of Mississippi ? Could the Republicans by suitable concessions have prevented war ? 59. Paper No. 28. Lincoln's Democracy. BIBLIOGRAPHY. Handbook, 19*, 19/; Guide, 208; D. Fish, Lincoln Literature. HISTORICAL DISCUSSIONS. J. T. Morse, Abraham Lincoln, I, 456, 457, II, 23, 93-97, 332, 333, 403; J. F. Rhodes, United States, I, 92, 492, II, 62, 70, 266-268, 308, 344, 430-432, 457, 473, 500-502, III, 300-305, 316-320, 334, 439, 631-633, IV, 69-76, 120, 157-162, 199-216, 296-298, 350-354, 419-425, 460-464, 518-522, 531-539; H. Greeley, American Conflict, I, 301, 302, 321-326, 418-429, 452-461, 466-470, II, 251, 253, 257, 259, 490-492, 528, 562-564, 673, 675-677, 747, 748 ; J. Schouler, United States, V, 76, 77, 80, 81, 112, 127, 128, 411-416, 459-465, 493-502, VI, 1-23, 111-126, 215-232, 463- 477, 519-527, 565-568, 607-616, 622-633; Goldwin Smith, United States, 238-242, 248, 250-254, 280-288; H. Von Hoist. United States, VT, 267-300, VII, 165-186, 244, 245; J. W. Draper, Civil War, I, 506, II, 13-20, 36-38, 590-611, III, 476-479, 601, 626-630 ; J. G. Elaine, Twenty Tears of Con- gress, I, 133. 140-150, 168-172, 279-299, 309-311, 332-336, 350-354, 371, 435, 438-448, 453-457, 488-496, 503, 514-517, 528-536, 546-549, II, 15-17; H. Wilson, Slave Power, II, 203, 204, 566-577, 692-695, III, 1, 173-183, 213, 221-224, 246- 250, 516-528, 560-590; A. H. Stephens, War between the States, I, 442-445, 520, II, 34, 35, 40, 49, 263-269, 277, 278, 346, 351, 409-420, 433-444, 445-463; A. B. Hart, Salmon P. Chase, 187-198, 202-212, 260-270, 290-299, 302-333, 430- 432 ; J. W. Burgess, Civil War and the Constitution, I, chs. i, iii, II, ch. xvi ; Nicolay and Hay, Abraham Lincoln, espe- cially II, chs. viii, ix, xi, III, ch. xxi, VII, chs. vi, viii, xv, xix, VIII, ch. vii, IX, chs. iii, v, viii, xvi, X, ch. xviii ; R. H. 58,59] LINCOLN'S DEMOCRACY 187 Gillet, Democracy in the United States, 259-266 ; H. C. Lodge, George Washington, II, 303-309 ; C. Schurz, Abraham Lin- coln ; J. H. Choate, Abraham Lincoln j C. A. Dana, Lincoln and his Cabinet; H. Watterson, Abraham Lincoln; A. K. McClure, Abraham Lincoln. ADDITIONAL HISTORICAL DISCUSSIONS. J. R. Lowell, Politi- cal Essays, 75-91 ; R. Johnson, Short History of the War, 40, 41, 47, 201, 212-214, 458, 476, 480, 526-529; S. S. Cox, Three Decades, 227, 318, 343-345; J. C. Ropes, Story of the Civil War, I, ch. v; J. G. Nicolay, Outbreak of the Rebellion, ch. iv; S. McCall, Thaddeus Stevens, 111-113, 136-140, 185, 186, 192-199, 216-226 ; T. K. Lothrop, William H. Seward, 209-211, 231-233, 244-255, 279, 280, 332-386; J. Davis, Confederate Government, I, 322-325 ; J. N. Lamed, History for Ready Reference, V, 3417-3422 ; Lives of Lincoln by H. J. Raymond, J. G. Holland, W. H. Lamon, W. H. Herndon and J. W. Weik, I. N. Arnold, A. T. Rice, N. Hapgood and N. Brooks. SOURCES. Contemporaries, IV, 44, 50, 66,96, 97, 101, 126-128, 145. J. D. Richardson, Messages, VI, 1-297, espe- cially 5-12 (first inaugural), 20-31 (message of July 4, 1861), 44-58, 126-142, 179-181, 243-255 (annual messages), 276 (second inaugural), 157-159 (Proclamation of Emancipation). A. Lincoln, Works, especially I, 178-180, 180-209, 226- 235, 240-245, 273-518 (Lincoln-Douglas Debates), II, 1-7 (first inaugural), 55-66 (message of July 4, 1861), 93-106, 261-277, 445-456, 604-615 (annual messages), 656, 657 (second inaugural), 439 (Gettysburg address), 287, 288 (Proc- lamation of Emancipation). Inaugurals in American His- tory Leaflets, No. 18; L. E. Chittenden, Abraham Lincoln's Speeches ; Abraham Lincoln, Tributes from his Associates (in- cluding G. W. Curtis, G. S. Boutwell, G. F. Hoar, F. B. Sanborn). 188 CONSTITUTIONAL PAPERS [ SPECIMEN QUESTIONS. Did Lincoln think the people of Kentucky capable of popular government ? Did Lincoln ex- pect negro suffrage? Would Lincoln have favored a property qualification in the Chicago of 1901? Did Lincoln yield to what he believed to be popular sentiment ? 60. Paper No. 29. Military Powers of the Presi- dent. BIBLIOGRAPHY. Handbook, 19/, 20/i, 20;, 21m, 50, 75, 82, 85 ; Guide, 213, 214. CONSTITUTIONAL DISCUSSIONS. J. Story, Commentaries (4th and 5th eds.), 1199-1215, 1490-1492, 1564, 1799-1801; J. N. Pomeroy, Constitutional Law, 431-436, 441-482, 662- 668, 703-714; H. C. Black, Constitutional Law, 95, 99-102, 118-120, 220-224, 599-602; J. I. C. Hare, Constitutional Law, 171-174,905-984 ; J. R. Tucker, Constitution, II, 576-597, 643- 652, 715-718; C. F. Randolph, Law and Policy of Annexation, 106-121 ; H. Von Hoist, Constitutional Law, 11, 44, 48-50, 55, 56 ; T. M. Cooley, Constitutional Law, (ed. 1880) 52, 86- 90, 100, 137, 287-289, (ed. 1891) 88-92, 103, 144, 145, 298- 301, (ed. 1898) 98-102, 114, 121, 156, 157, 315-317; J. W. Burgess, Political Science, II, 154-156, 259-262; B. A. Hins- dale, American Government, 204-209, 298-303; J. J. Lalor, Cylcopcedia, II, 133, 542-546 ; J. D. Andrews, American Latv, ch. xix; W. A. Dunning, Civil War and Reconstruction; B. R. Curtis, Executive Power, in G. T. Curtis, Constitutional History, II, 668-677 ; J. W. Burgess, Civil War and the Con- stitution, I, 226-236. ADDITIONAL HISTORICAL DISCUSSIONS. W. Whiting, War Powers of the President ; W. Whiting, Military Government of Hostile Territory; W. Whiting, War Powers under the Consti- tution of the United States ; G-. B. Davis, Military Law in the United States; S. F. Miller, Constitution, 162-164. 349, 507, 59,60] MILITARY POWERS 189 624-626 ; J. Schouler, Constitutional Studies, 136-146, 163, 167; W. Rawle, View of the Constitution, 109-111, 117, 118, 151-161; T. Walker, American Law, 99, 100, 174-178; F. Wharton, Commentaries, 457, 502, 503; A. Conkling, Powers of the Executive Department, 80-88. CASES. Ex parte Merryman (1861) : Taney's Reports, 246 ; J. B. Thayer, Cases, 2361. Prize Cases (1863): 2 Black, 635; 4 Miller, 876; J. B. Thayer, Cases, 2339; E. McClain, Cases, 515 ; C. E. Boyd, Cases, 342. Martin v. Mott (1827): 12 Wheaton, 19; 7 Curtis, 10; J. B. Thayer, Cases, 2290; C. E. Boyd, Cases, 338; E. McClain, Cases, 518. Luther v. Borden (1848): 7 Howard, 1; 17 Curtis, 1; J. B. Thayer, Cases, 193, 254, 2352, 2391; C. E. Boyd, Cases, 647; E. McClain, Cases, 595. Texas v. White (1868): 7 Wallace, 700; J. B. Thayer, Cases, 302; C. E. Boyd, Cases, 552. Ex parte Milligan (1866): 4 Wallace, 2; J. B. Thayer, Cases, 2376; C. E. Boyd, Cases, 351. The Grapeshot (1869): 9 Wallace, 129. Fleming v. Page (1849): 9 Howard, 603; 18 Curtis, 278. United States v. Eliason (1842) : 16 Peters, 291 ; 14 Curtis, 304. Mississippi v. Johnson (1866): 4 Wallace, 475 ; J. B. Thayer, Cases, 196 ; C. E. Boyd, Cases, 652 ; E. McClain, Cases, 102. Houston v. Moore (1820) : 5 Wheaton, 1 ; 4 Curtis, 535. The Protector (1871) : 12 Wallace, 700.- Crossu Harrison (1853): 16 Howard, 164; 21 Curtis, 66.- Jecker v. Montgomery (1851) : 13 Howard, 498 ; 19 Curtis, 615. Dooley v. United States (1901): 182 U. S., 222.- Downesv. Bidwell (1901): 182 U. S., 244. Diamond Rings Case (1901). HISTORICAL DISCUSSIONS. J. F. Rhodes, United States, III, IV, especially III, 181-192, 216-251,' 283-287, 325-360, 364, 394, 438, 486, 553-558, IV, 55, 69-76, 157-172, 212-215, 227-236, 245-255, 416-418; G. T.Curtis, James Buchanan, II, 330-365 ; J. C. Ropes, Story of the Civil War, I, chs. v- 190 CONSTITUTIONAL PAPERS [ vii ; J. T. Morse, Abraham Lincoln, I, chs. vii, viii ; J. Davis, Confederate Government, I, 263-328; J. W. Draper, Civil War, I, 558-567; E. A. Pollard, Lost Cause, 103-111 ; H. Greeley, American Conflict, I, 428-458; A. H. Stephens, War between the States, II, 34-44, 344-355; Comte de Paris, Civil War in America, I, 140-148; J. G. Elaine, Twenty Years of Con- gress, I, 292-300 ; S. G. Fisher, Evolution of the Constitution, 158-161; W. M. Meigs, Growth of the Constitution, 216-218; G. C. Gorham, E. M. Stanton, I, chs. xiii, xiv. SOURCES. Constitution of the United States, Preamble ; Art. I, Sect. 1; Sect. 8, 11, 15; Sect. 9, 2, 6; Sect. 10, 3; Art. II, Sect. 1, 1, 7 ; Sect. 2, 1 ; Sect. 3. Lincoln's inaugural message and proclamations : Works, II, 1-7, 1 1- 22, 34-36, 239 ; American History Leaflets, No. 12 ; Annual Cyclopaedia (1861), 600-607; Congressional Globe, 36 Cong., 2 sess. (1861), 1433-1435, 37 Cong., 1 sess. (1861), App. 1-4. - J. D. Richardson, Messages, V, 626, VJ, 5, 13, 14, 98, 157, 170; American History Leaflets, No. 26. Speech of J. A. Bayard on executive usurpation, in Congresssional Globe, 37 Cong., 1 sess. (1861), App. 12-19. Speech of M. S. Latham, in Congressional Globe, 37 Cong., 1 sess. (1861), 19-22. Statutes of July 13 and 22, 1861, in Statutes at Large, XII, 255, 268. J. Buchanan, Buchanan' s Administration, 108-134. J. S. Black, in Opinions of the Attorneys General, IX, 516- 526. Gen. Scott's " Views," in J. Buchanan, Buchanan's Ad- ministration, 99-108. South Carolina correspondence, in Congressional Globe, 36 Cong., 2 sess. (1861), 817-819. Lincoln's views: American History Leaflets, Nos. 12, 18; A. Lincoln, Works, II, 32, 33, 55-66. D. Webster, Works, III, 448-505. J. C. Calhoun, Works, II, 262-309. Acts of May 2, 1792, Feb. 28, 1795, March 3, 1807, July 29, 1861, May 31, 1870, April 20, 1871, in Statutes at Large, I, 264, 424, II, 443, XII, 281-282, XVI, 140-146, XVII, 13-15. 60,61] RECONSTRUCTION 191 SPECIMEN QUESTIONS. May a President carry on military operations without a declaration of war ? Could the President have arrested and confined a member of Congress during the Civil War ? Could the President order the confiscation of property as a war measure? Could the President suspend the operations of law of a loyal State, on the ground that it was an impediment to military operations? 61. Paper No. 30. Reconstruction. BIBLIOGRAPHY. Handbook, 19/, 2 la, 21 e; J. J. Lalor, Cyclapcedia, III, 556. CONSTITUTIONAL DISCUSSIONS. W. A. Dunning, Civil War and Reconstruction ; J. W. Burgess, Reconstruction and the Constitution (in preparation) ; H. Von Hoist, Constitutional Law, on, 13, 80; J. Tiffany, Treatise in Government, 316- 322; G. T. Curtis, Constitutional History, IT, ch. xi; R.Foster, Commentaries, 38 ; J. R. Tucker, Constitution, 291, 311; H. C. Black, Constitutional Laiv, 260-266 ; J. D. Andrews, American Law, 428, 429 ; T. M. Cooley, Constitutional Law, (ed. 1880) 172, 173, 197, (ed. 1891) 178, 179, 205, (ed. 1898) 190, 191, 21(>; J. I. C. Hare, Constitutional Law, 131, 509, 747, 948; G. S. Boutwell, Constitution, ch. xlix. CASES. Mississippi v. Johnson (1866) : 4 Wallace, 475 ; J. B. Thayer, Cases, 196; C. E. Boyd, Cases, 652; E. Mc- Clain, Cases, 102. White v. Hart (1871): 13 Wallace, 646; J. B. Thayer, Cases, 259. Keith v. Clark (1878) : 97 U. S., 454. Texas v. White (1868): 7 Wallace, 700 ; J. B. Thayer, Cases, 302 ; C. E. Boyd, Oases, 552. Gunn v. Barry (1872): 15 Wallace, 610. White v. Cannon (1867) : 6 Wallace, 443. United States v. Keehler (1869): 9 Wallace, 83. Hick- man v. Jones (1869): 9 Wallace, 197. Sprott v. United States (1874): 20 Wallace, 459. Williams v. Bruffy (1877): 96 U. S., 176. Ketchum v. Buckley (1878): 99 U. S., 188. 192 CONSTITUTIONAL PAPERS [ HISTORICAL DISCUSSIONS. W. A. Dunning, Civil War and Reconstruction ; C. E. Chadsey, The Struggle between Presi- dent Johnson and Congress orer Reconstruction ; E. G. Scott, Reconstruction during Civil War; A. B. Hart, Salmon P. Chase, chs. xiii, xiv; G. C. Gorham, E. M. Stanton^ parts ix, x; J. S. Landon, Constitutional History, 250-261 ; M. Storey, Charles Sumner, chs. xvi, xviii; F. W. Moore, Representation of Seceding States (American Historical Review, II, 279-293, 461- 471); W. H. Barnes, Thirty-Ninth Congress, chs. iii, vi-xiii, xvii-xx, xxii ; W. Wilson, Division and Reunion, 124- 142; J. J. Lalor, Cyclopaedia, III, 540-556; E. Stanwood, Presidential Elections, 236-276 ; E. L. Pierce, Charles Sum- ner, III, ch. xxi; J. G. Elaine, Twenty Years of Congress, II, 3-465 ; H. Wilson, Slave Power, III, 603-630. SOURCES. Constitution of the United States, Art. I, Sect. 2 r 3, 4; Sect. 3, 1, 2 ; Sect. 4, 1 ; Sect. 5, 1, 2; Sect. 7, 2; Sect. 10; Art. II, Sect. 2; Art. Ill, Sect. 2; Art. IV r Sect. 2, 1; Sect. 3, 1; Sect. 4; Art. V; Art. VI, 2; Art. VII; Amends. IX; X; XIII-XV. Contemporaries, IV, 141-157; Source-Book, 127-132; American History Leaflets,. No. 26. Lincoln's proclamation of Sept. 22, 1862: Works, II, 239 ; Annual Cyclopedia (1861), 725, 726; J. D. Richard- son, Messages, VI, 96. Proclamation of Jan. 1, 1863 : Works, II, 287, 288 ; J. D. Richardson, Messages, VI, 157. Contem- porary speeches, in A. Johnston, American Orations, III, 249- 311. Acts of April 9, 1866, July 16, 1866, March 2, 1867, March 23, 1867, July 19, 1867, June 22, 1868, June 25, 1868, July 6, 1868, July 25, 1868, in Statutes at Large, XIV, 37, 173, 428, XV, 2, 14, 72, 73, 83, 193. Johnson's vetoes: Congressional Globe, 39 Cong., 1 sess. (1861), 915, 1679, 3849, 39 Cong., 2 sess. (1867), 1969, 40 Cong., 1 sess. (1867), 313, 741, 40 Cong., 2 sess. (1868), 3330, 3484, 4235. J. D. Rich- ardson, Messages, VI, 398, 405, 422, 498, 531, 536, 648, 650, 651. E. McPherson, Reconstruction, parts i, ii. 61,62] AMERICAN DIPLOMACY 193 SPECIMEN QUESTIONS. May a State forfeit its privileges in the Union while remaining a State of the Union ? Could the two Houses of Congress refuse to admit Massachusetts Senators and Representatives to Congress? May Congress divide a State which is in arms against the government without its con- sent? Could Congress have affixed as a condition of the entrance of Utah into the Union that it ratify an amendment to the Federal Constitution prohibiting polygamy ? 62. Materials for the Weekly Papers in History 14. Use freely the cross references to the Handbook, and other bibliographical references at the head of each paper (Hand- book, 63-92). A bibliography of American diplomacy will be found in A. B. Hart, Foundations of American Foreign Policy, ch. viii (analysis at page x of the Contents). This list includes bibliographical aids, secondary works, and sources. The general works which will be of most service are enumer- ated in Foundations, 78A, 78B, and in Handbook, 9, 12, 3ld. Many of the biographies of diplomats will also be ser- viceable : see Foundations, 79F; Guide, 32. Books on special topics will be found in Foundations, 78 A, 78 D. Critical estimates of the value of the principal secondary books in American history are printed in J. N. Lamed, Literature of American History, a Bibliographical Guide. Many periodical articles are mentioned in the references for papers in diplomacy (Handbook, 63-92), and in the list of diplomatic lectures (Handbook, 20) ; other articles may be reached through the invaluable Index to Legal Periodical Liter- ature (2 vols.), by L. A. Jones, which refers to many sets not strictly legal in character. Special essays and scattered dis- cussions, if gathered into book form, can be reached through W. I. Fletcher, u A. L. A." Index to General Literature (2d ed.)- 13 194 DIPLOMATIC PAPERS [ Diplomatic sources are classified and the principal collec- tions indicated in Foundations, 79. Besides the list of reports containing international law cases in Foundations, 79(7, another list will be found in Handbook, 31c. Lists of collections of treaties in Foundations, 79(2; Handbook, 31c. Some of the collections of sources in Handbook, 31(7, are also useful for diplomacy. The most important sources are the official publications of the United States government, classified and enumerated in Foundations, 79Z). The authorities most distinctly available for the papers in diplomacy will be found in the lists of Text-books, Essential Reference Books, and Special Collection in Diplomacy (Hand- book, 9, 10, 12) ; in the parallel readings and references under the lectures in Handbook, 20 ; and in the specific references in Handbook, 63-92. Many of these books are reserved in the Reading Room of the Library under the rubric " Diplomatic History." 63. Paper No. i. Principles of European Claims to wild Territory. BIBLIOGRAPHY. Handbook, 17, 20a, 64, 67; Guide, 82-90 ; A. P. C. Griffin, List of Books relating to Coloniza- tion ; F. Snow, Cases and Opinions, xvii, xviii. HISTORICAL DISCUSSIONS. J. Winsor, Christopher Columbus, chs. ix-xvi, App. ; J. Winsor, Cartier to Frontenac, chs. i-iii, ix-xiii; J. Winsor, Narrative and Critical, II, chs. i-viii, IV, chs. i-iii, v, viii, ix; H. Harrisse, Diplomatic History of Amer- ica ; E. G. Bourne, Essays in Historical Criticism, Nos. vi- viii; R. Hildreth, United States, I, ch. i; H. H. Bancroft, Pacific States, I, chs. ii-iv, ix, IV, chs. i-vi, XIII, ch. iii, XXII, chs. v-vii; W. Kingsford, Canada, I, chs. i-vi; C. Gayarre, Louisiana, I, 14-40, 57-59. TREATISES. W. E. Hall, International Law (4th ed.), 106- 62-64] EUROPEAN CLAIMS 195 130; Lawrence's Wheaton, 304-308; R. Phillimore, Interna- tional Law (3d ed.), I, 324-341, 349-352; J. N. Pomeroy, International Law, 91-103; T. A. Walker, International Law, 158-161 ; T. Twiss, Law of Nations, I, 113-134 ; T. J. Lawrence, International Law, 92-96 ; H. S. Maine, Inter- national Law, 66-71 ; C. Calvo, Droit International (4th ed.), I, 23-25, 388-390, 432. SOURCES. Contemporaries, I, 17, 18, 34-36, 38; F. Snow, Cases and Opinions, 6-12. 64. Paper No. 2. Foundations of English Claims to America. BIBLIOGRAPHY. Handbook, 20a, 63, 65; Guide, 92- 96 ; J. Winsor, Narrative and Critical, III, 97-100, 121-126, 153-168, 184-218, 411-420, VIII, 65-80. HISTORICAL DISCUSSIONS. C. F. Lucas, Historical Geogra- phy, V, ch. i; J. R. Brodhead, New York, I, 4, 10, 11, 92, 96, 138, 257, 323, 324, 340, 663, 725, 735, II, 249-251; J. Win- sor, Mississippi Basin, ch. xv ; J. Winsor, Narrative and Critical, III, chs. i-iv; G. Bancroft, United States (10- vol. ed.), I, ch. iii ; J. R. Seeley, Expansion of England, lect. vii ; J. A. Doyle, English in America, I, ch. iv; A. Brown, Genesis of the United States, I, 1-28; R. Hildreth, United States, I, chs. i, iii; Attempts toward Colonization (American Historical Review, IV, 678-702). TREATISES. C. Calvo, Droit International (4th ed.), I, 408- 416. See also Handbook, 63. SOURCES. Contemporaries, I, 26, 27, 32, 46-48, 51-54, 72, 78, 106, 109; American History Leaflets, No. 9; W. Mac- Donald, Select Charters, Nos. 1, 4; A. Brown, Genesis of the United States, I, 88-90, 100, 102, 118-124, 260-264, II, 609, 610, 669-675; " R. S.," Nova Britannia (P. Force, Tracts, I, No. 6) ; M. F. Farnham, Farnham Papers, Nos. 1-50 (Maine Hist. Soc., Collections, 2d ser., VII). 196 DIPLOMATIC PAPERS [ 65. Paper No. 3. Theory of Indian Land-Holding. BIBLIOGRAPHY. Handbook, 206, 55, 63, 64; Guide, 80; R. Clarke & Co., Bibliotheca Americana, s. v. Indian; T. W. Field, Indian Bibliography ; J. Sabin, Dictionary of American Bibliography, IX, 86; J. Winsor, Narrative and Critical, I, 316-328, VII, 446. HISTORICAL DISCUSSIONS. P. A. Bruce, Economic History of Virginia, I, 493-498 ; G. E. Ellis, Red Man and White Man, chs. iv, vi ; J. Winsor, Narrative and Critical, I, 286, 296-298, 300; M. Egleston, Land System, 4-7. TREATISES. J. Kent, Commentaries, III, 377-400; J. Story, Commentaries, I, 3-38, 152-154; F. Wharton, Digest, II, 209; Dana's Wheaton, note 24; H. S. Maine, International Law, 71-75 ; T. Twiss, Law of Nations, I, 135-137; Law- rence's Wheaton, 68-70, 306; R. Phillimore, International Law (3d ed.), II, 340, 341, 345-349; C. Calvo, Droit Interna- tional (4th ed.), I, 208-210, VI, 7. CASES. Cherokee Nation v. Georgia (1832): 5 Peters, 1; 9 Curtis, 178; P. Cobbett, Leading Cases, 1-3. Johnson v* Mclntosh (1828): 8 Wheaton, 543; 5 Curtis, 503; F. Snow, Cases and Opinions, 6-9. Elk v. Wilkins (1884) : 112 U. S., 94 ; F. Snow, Cases and Opinions, 230-233. United States v. Kagama (1886) : 118 U. S., 375 ; F. Snow, Cases and Opinions, 233-241. Cherokee Nation v. Southern Kansas Railway Com- pany (1890) : 135 U. S., 641. SOURCES. Contemporaries, I, 40, 45, 60, 64, 92, 123, 127, 133, 152, 162; Mass. Hist. Soc., Collections, 3d ser., II, 270, V, 35-59, 4th ser., V, 338, 5th ser., IX, 118-120; Colo- nial Laws of Massachusetts, (1660-1672) 160-162, 181, (1672- 1686) 74, 75; Massachusetts Records, I, 243, 394, 400, III, 281, IV, part i, 102, part ii, 282; W. W. Hening, Statutes of Virginia, I, 323-326, 456, 467, II, 138-143 ; New York Colonial Documents, I, 58, 99, 128, 287, II, 557, VI, 59, 294, 295, 850, 851, 865, 962, VII, 76, 313, 473, 590. 65-67] INDIAN LAND-HOLDING 197 66. Paper No. 4. Execution of the Acts of Trade. BIBLIOGRAPHY. Handbook, 19a, 206, 63; Guide, 133, 134, 146; J. Winsor, Narrative and Critical, VI, 63-65; G. L. Beer, Commercial Policy of England, 159-167 (Columbia University, Studies, III). HISTORICAL DISCUSSIONS. J. Winsor, Narrative and Critical, VI, 11, 12; G. Bancroft, ETwited /Sfrates (author's final ed.), Ill, 35, 59-62 ; J. G. Palfrey, Compendious History of New England, III, 148, 178-180, 317, 318, 330, 331, 339, IV, 297, 298, 305, 331, 332, 381 ; W. Tudor, James Otis, chs. v, vi; W. B. Weeden, Economic and Social History of New .England, I, 238, II, 556-559 ; J. R. Seeley, Expansion of England, 65- 70; R. Hildreth, United States, II, 197-199, 498-500; W. E. H. Lecky, England (Eng. ed.), II, 7-11, III, 299-310. TREATISES. W. J. Ashley, Surveys Historic and Economic, 336-360 ; G. L. Beer, Commercial Policy of England, 32-34, 123-143 (Columbia University, Studies, III) ; E. L. Lord, Indus- trial Experiments in the British Colonies, 124-139 ; E. Chan- ning, Navigation Laws, 12-16. SOURCES. Contemporaries, I, 54, 70, 135, 240,11, 45, 46, 49, 131, 146; American History Leaflets, No. 19; W. MacDonald, Select Charters, Nos. 22, 23, 25, 28, 34; Prince Society, Andros Tracts, I, xx, 41, II, 57; Colonial Laws of Massachusetts (1672-1686), 258, 289, 290; North Carolina Colonial Records, I, 244-246 ; New York Colonial Documents, III, 44-47, 263, IV, 303, 461, 462, V, 58, 59; T. Pownall, Administration of the Colonies (4th ed.), 281-312 ; Prince Society, Edward Randolph, II-V (see Indexes, s. v. Acts of Trade). 67. Paper No. 5. Execution of the Spanish Colonial Policy. BIBLIOGRAPHY. Handbook, 20a, 65; Guide, 86; J. 198 DIPLOMATIC PAPERS [ Winsor, Narrative and Critical, II, 331-348, VIII, 246- 294, 342-368 ; H. C. Morris, Colonization, II, 336-340 ; A. Ireland, Tropical Colonization, 257, 258 ; R. G. Thwaites, Colonies, 45. HISTORICAL DISCUSSIONS. F. W. Blackman, Spanish Colo- nization in the Southwest, 7-14, 48-63 (Johns Hopkins Univer- sity, Studies, VIII, 121-128, 162-177) ; P. S. Reinsch, Colonial Government ; T. G. F. Raynal, Historic des jfitablissemens et du Commerce des Europeens dans les deux Indes (ed. 1781), IV, 227-294; J. M. Callahan, Cuba and International Rela- tions, ch. ii; B. Moses, Spanish Rale in America, 17-26, 293- 313 ; P. P. Leroy-Beaulieu, Colonisation chez les Peuples Modernes (3d ed.), 1-40, 251-273; E. J. Payne, European Colonies, 49-53 ; J. H. Latane", United States and Spanish America, ch. i; A. Helps, Spanish Conquest; J. Winsor, Nar- rative and Critical, VIII, chs. iv, v ; H. Butter worth, South America, 69-92 ; G. Bancroft, United States (10-vol. ed.), I, 34-68 ; R. G. Watson, Spanish and Portuguese South America, II, chs. viii-x. SOURCES. Contemporaries, I, 23, 29-31, 33, 36, 46, 48, II, 118, III, 45, IV, 187, 188; Annual Register, IX, 2, 18-20, XV, 10-12, XXVIII, 35-37, LII, 223-231, LVII, 127. Government documents on Cuba, Porto Rico, and the Philippines: President's message of April 11, 1898, House Documents, 55 Cong., 2 sess. (1898), LXIV, No. 405; consular correspondence, House Documents, 55 Cong., 2 sess. (1898), LXIV, No. 406 ; Senate report on affairs in Cuba, Senate Re- ports, 55 Cong., 2 sess. (1898), V; H. K. Carroll, Report of Porto Rico ; Gov. Allen's reports ; reports of Philippine Com- missions, Senate Documents, 56 Cong., 1 sess. (1899), XLIV XL VI, 56 Cong., 2 sess. (1900), No. 112. 67-69] COLONIAL POLICY 199 68. Paper No. 6. Rule of 1756. BIBLIOGRAPHY. Handbook, 20c, 73, 76, 85, 87 ; F. Snow, Cases and Opinions, xxxviii. HISTORICAL DISCUSSIONS. A. T. Mahan, Sea Power and French Revolution, II, 234-239, 242, 266-269, 353-356 ; W. W. Story, Joseph Story, I, 285-289 ; J. Madison, Examination of the British Doctrine (Writings, II, 229-391; 1 Wheaton Reports, App. iii). TREATISES. W. E. Hall, International Law (4th ed.), 234; R. Phillimore, International Law (3d ed.), Ill, 370-384; T. D. Woolsey, International Law (6th ed.), 200, 201; C. Calvo, Droit International (4th ed.), I, 49, IV, 562-566; T. Ortolans, Diplomatie de la Mer, II, book iii, ch. v ; A. G. Heffter, Droit International, 165 ; F. Snow, Interna- tional Law, 64; T. A. Walker, International Law, 258-262, 399, 400 ; H. Wheaton, History of the Law of Nations, 217-229 ; Lawrence's Wheaton, 814-819 ; Dana's Wheaton, 508 ; H. W. Halleck, International Law (Baker ed.), II, 325-339; J. Kent, Commentaries, I, 81-85. SOURCES. Contemporaries, III, 120; F. Snow, Cases and Opinions, 502-508; P. Cobbett, Leading Cases, 330-333; other cases are titled in R. Phillimore, International Law, III, 385, 386 ; F. Wharton, Digest, III, 388 ; Annual Register, I, 144-175, XLVIII, 246-248. 69. Paper No. 7. Territorial Policy of the Conti- nental Congress. BIBLIOGRAPHY. Handbook, 196, 20d, 42, 75; Guide, 150, 161; B. A. Hinsdale, Old Northwest, 429-432. HISTORICAL DISCUSSIONS. F. J. Turner, Western State Mak- ing (American Historical Review, I, 70-87, 251-269) ; C. E. Bond, County of Illinois (American Historical Review, IV, 623-635); G. Bancroft, History of the Constitution, I, 154- 200 DIPLOMATIC PAPERS [. 156, 168-183, II, 98-118; R. Hildreth, United States, III, 398-400, 527-529; W. Kingsford, Canada, VI, 499-519; T. Roosevelt, Winning of the West, II, chs. x-xii, III, chs. i-vi ; J. Winsor, Narrative and Critical, VII, 527-541 ; J. Winsor, Westward Movement, 167-169, 185-187, 198-208, 245-247, 257-267, 280-293 ; B. A. Hinsdale, Old Northwest, chs. xi-xvi ; Foundations, 42-44 ; G. W. Curtis, Constitutional History, I, 90-94, 196-208. SOURCES. Contemporaries, III, 42-47 ; American History Leaflets, Nos. 22, 32; M. Hill, Liberty Documents, ch. xvi; Journals of Congress, VI-XII (see Index, s. v. Territory, Territorial claims, West territory) ; Secret Journals of Congress, I, 427-447 ; Cutlers, Manasseh Cutler, I, 152-197, 292-305, II, 373-384. 70. Paper No. 8. Breaking the Instructions of Con- gress at Paris. BIBLIOGRAPHY. Handbook, 20d, 72; Guide, 141; F. Wharton, Digest, 150. HISTORICAL DISCUSSIONS. G. Pellew, John Jay, chs. vii, viii ; W. H. Trescot, Diplomacy of the Revolution, ch. iv ; T. Lymau, United States Diplomacy (2d ed.), I, 100-106, 118- 128; F. Wharton, Revolutionary Diplomatic Correspondence, I, Introduction, 109-111, 158; F. Wharton, Digest, III, App. 150; G. Bancroft, United States (final ed.), V, 472-474, 525- 527, 547-553, 562-580; R. Hildreth, United States, III, 413, 417-420; J. Adams, Works, I, 340-342, 363-376, 386-396; H. Doniol, Participation de la France, V, chs. v, vi; W. E. H. Lecky, England (Eng. ed.), IV, 255-264 ; J. Winsor, Narrative and Critical, VII, ch. ii. TREATISES. R. Phillimore, International Law (3d ed.), II, 255; C. Calvo, Droit International (4th ed.), Ill, 171, 172; W. E. Hall, International Law (4th ed.), 347 ; Lawrence's Wlieaton, 443-452; Dana's Wheaton, 257-262. 9-71] INSTRUCTIONS OF CONGRESS 201 SOURCES. F. Wharton, Revolutionary Diplomatic Corre- spondence, IY-VI (see Index, s. v. Peace commissioners) ; J. Jay, Correspondence and Public Papers, II, 345-347, 353, 366-452, III, 14-19, 56-64; J. Adams, Works, III, 299-303, 307-314, 336, 347, 366, VII, 150, 151, 627, 653, VIII, 87-91, IX, 514- 517 ; B. Franklin, Works (Bigelow ed.), VIII, 228-234, 239, 240; Secret Journals of Congress, II, 224-228, 339, 340, 445, 446. 71. Paper No. 9. Navigation of the Mississippi and St. Lawrence. BIBLIOGRAPHY. Handbook, 20e ; Guide, 153. HISTORICAL DISCUSSIONS. T. Lyman, United States Diplo- macy (2d ed.)', I, 221-258; W. H. Trescot, Diplomatic History of the Administrations of Washington and Adams, 43-50, 225- 267; G. Bancroft, History of the Constitution, II, 295-298; W. Kingsford, Canada, IX, 305, 306 ; T. Roosevelt, Winning of the West, III, ch. iii ; G. T. Curtis, Constitutional History, 1, 208-220, 671-673. TREATISES. Lawrence's Wlieaton, 346-362 ; Dana's Wlieaton, 193-205, note 118; H. Wheaton, History of Law of Nations, 498-517; F. Snow, Cases and Opinions, 32-41 ; R. Phillimore, International Law (3d ed.), I, 223-228, 240-247; J. N. Pomeroy, International Law, 131-136; W. E. Hall, Inter- national Law (4th ed.), 136-146 ; T. J. Lawrence, International Law, 112; P. Cobbett, Leading Cases, 45, 46; C. Calvo, Droit International, I, 433-435, 447-451. SOURCES. J. Q. Adams, Duplicate Letters ; F. Wharton, Digest, I, 30 ; American State Papers, Foreign, I, 247-263, 271-274, 438, 439, 533-549, V, 539-543, 561-563, 571-579, VI, 757-777. 202 DIPLOMATIC PAPERS [ 72. Paper No. 10. Policy of American Isolation. BIBLIOGRAPHY. Handbook, 19d, 20e, 70, 79,92; Guide., 164, 178. HISTORICAL DISCUSSIONS. T. Lyman, United States Diplo- macy (2d ed.), I, 291-312; W. H. Trescot, Diplomatic History of the Administrations of Washington and Adams, 137-146; R. Hildreth, United States, IV, 412-415, 686, V, 421; Foun- dations, 1, 6, 8, 12; T. Roosevelt, American Ideals, No. xii ; R. Olney, International Isolation of the United States (Atlantic Monthly, LXXXI, 577-588) ; T. D. Woolsey, Ameri- ca's Foreign Policy, 1-21, 169, 170, 188-191. SOURCES. Contemporaries, III, 92-94 ; American History Leaflets, No. 4 ; M. Hill, Liberty Documents, ch. xviii ; F. Wharton, Digest, 45 ; G. Washington, Writings (Sparks ed.), X, 533-548, XII, 202-209, 228-233. 73. Paper No. n. Was France Entitled to Com- plain of the Jay Treaty? BIBLIOGRAPHY. Handbook, IM, 20e, 76; Guide, 162; J. J. Lalor, Cyclopaedia, II, 638. HISTORICAL DISCUSSIONS. Arbitrations, V, 4414-4432; H. Flanders, Lives of the Chief Justices, I, 401-414; R. Hildreth, United States, IV, 539-556, 591-616, V, 73-78; H. Von Hoist, United States, I, 131-138; J. J. Lalor, Cyclopaedia, II, 634-638; J. Schouler, United States, I, 308-326; T. Lyman, Diplomacy of the United States (2d ed.), I, 177-208; W. H. Trescot, Diplomatic History of the Administrations of Washington and Adams, 69-128, 152-168; W. Jay, John Jay, I, 322-342 ; G. Pellew, John Jay, ch. xi ; D. C. Gilman, James Monroe, (ed. 1885) 57-67, 221-229, (ed. 1900) 60-70, 252- 260; Jay's Treaty (Nation, LXI, 460, 461) ; F. C. Gray, Jay's Treaty (North American Review, XVII, 142-180); W. C. 72-74] ISOLATION AND JAY TREATY 203 Rives, James Madison, III, 527-534, 545-547, 569-578; H. S. Randall, Thomas Jefferson, II, 267-284. SOURCES. American State Papers, Foreign, I, 470-525, 559-583, 594-598, 711, 712, 730-747 ; Annals of Congress, 4 Cong., 1 sess. (1796), 970-1291; T. H. Benton, Abridgment, I, 702-754; M. Carey, American Remembrancer; J. Monroe, View of the Conduct of the Executive; F. Wharton, Digest, 150a; Contemporaries, III, 96, 97; G. Washington, Writ- ings (Sparks ed.), XI, 483-487, 504-529. 74. Paper No. 12. Allegiance and Impressment. BIBLIOGRAPHY. Handbook, 20e, 87; Guide, 162, 170-172, 192; J. J. Lalor, Cyclopaedia, I, 62, II, 85; F. Snow, Cases and Opinions, xxiv; J. Winsor, Narrative and Critical, VII, 521, 522. HISTORICAL DISCUSSIONS. Arbitrations, I, 842, 843, 898, 899; H. Adams, United States (see Index, s. v. Impressment) ; R. ^Hildreth, United States, IV, 442, 540, 563, 627, V, 73, 268, '34-536, 653-657, 661, VI, 262, 296, 349-353, 389, 457, 491 ; T. Lyman, Diplomacy of the United States (2d ed.), II, 11-17; W. H. Trescot, Diplomatic History of the Administrations of Washington and Adams, 88-90, 1-16 ; G. Tucker, United States, I, 520, II, 87, 88, 209-211, 285, 297; J. J. Lalor, Cyclopaedia, II, 79-82. TREATISES. W. E. Hall, International Law (4th ed.), 224, 225, 257-280 ; J. Kent, Commentaries, I, 153-158 ; Lawrence's Wheaton, 210-219; Dana's Wheaton, 108, 109, note 67; F. Wharton, Commentaries, 194-197, 238; T. A. Walker, International Law, 123-131; H. W. Halleck, International Law (Baker ed.), II, 300-304 ; Essay on Naturalization and Allegiance ; H. Wheaton, History of the Law of Nations, 585, 737-749 ; H. Wheaton, Enquiry into the Validity oj the British Claim; W. B. Lawrence, Visitation and Search, 1-5, 13-15, 204 DIPLOMATIC PAPERS [ 123; T. Coxe, Examination of the Conduct of Great Britain, 43-48. CASES. Talbot v. Janson (1795) : 3 Dallas, 133 ; 1 Curtis, 128. M'llvaine v. Coxe's Lessee (1808): 4 Cranch, 209; 2 Curtis, 74. Inglis v. Trustees of the Sailor's Snug Harbor (1830): 3 Peters, 99; 8 Curtis, 305. White v. Hart (1871): 13 Wallace, 646. SOURCES. American State Papers, Foreign, I-III (see Indexes under Impressment, Seamen), especially II, 489, III, 25, 36-87, 137, 140, 154, 173-176, 348, 574-583, 695-699, 704, 739, VI, 368-372; Annals of Congress, 3 Cong. (1794), 772-774, 4 Cong., 1 sess. (1796), 381-400, 802-820 ; British acts and treaties, in R. Phillimore, International Law (3d ed.), I, 653-666 ; T. Dwight, Hartford Convention, 52-64, 225-228 ; F. Wharton, Digest, 171, 173, 202, 331; F. Snow, Cases and Opinions, 213-219; Contemporaries, III, 116-119; J. Sparks, Gouverneur Morris, II, 20-23, III, 276, 280, 281 ; T. Jefferson, Writings (Washington ed.), Ill, 204-207, 334, 442-444, 525, IV, 133, V, 54, 63, 64, VI, 427, 467 ; H. S* Randall, Thomas Jefferson, II, 476, III, 298, 380n, 400n ; D. Webster, Works, II, 540, V, 140-146, VI, 318-328, 353, 356, 453-455, 522-528 ; J. Adams, Inadmissible Principles of the King of England's Proclamation (Works, IX, 312-330). 75. Paper No. 13. Status of Territory Annexed but not yet Organized. BIBLIOGRAPHY. Handbook, 19e, 20e, 42, 69 (with cases), 82, 91 ; Guide, 168; A. P. C. Griffin, List of Books on Porto Rico. HISTORICAL DISCUSSIONS. H. Adams, United States, II, 118-131, 399-401; F. X. Martin, Louisiana, cli. xxvii; P. S. Reinsch, Colonial Government, part vii ; S. E. Baldwin, His- toric Policy of the United States (Amer. Hist. Assoc., Annual 74, 75] STATUS OF TERRITORY 205 Report for 1893, 369-390); D. S. Jordan, Imperial Democracy, Nos. iii, iv; W. Reid, Problems of Expansion / G. C. Lewis, Government of Dependencies (Lucas ed.), Introduction ; T. Williams, Ethical and Political Principles of Expansion (Amer. Acad. Pol. Sci., Annals, XVI, 227-242) ; Foundations, chs. v, vi ; A. L. Lowell, Colonial Expansion (Atlantic Monthly, LXXXIII, 145-154). TREATISES. Lawrence's Wheaton, 55, 56, 99w, lOOn, 312- 316, 513n, 514?z, 591-597, 683n, 684n ; F. Wharton, Commen- taries, 460-465; H. Von Hoist, Constitutional Law, 53; J. H. Giddings, Democracy and Empire, chs. i, xvi, xvii; J. N. Pomeroy, Constitutional Law, 490-499; L. S. Rowe, Insular Decisions (Amer. Acad. Pol. Sci., Annals, 226-250) ; J. W. Burgess, Government of Distant Territory, Constitution and Newly Acquired Territory (Political Science Quarterly, XIV, 1-18, XV, 381-398) ; J. Lowndes, Law of Annexed Ter- ritory (Political Science Quarterly, XI, 672-693) ; E. Freund, Control of Dependencies through Protectorates (Political Science Quarterly, XIV, 19-38) ; R. D. Hunt, Legal Status of Califor- nia 1846-1849 (Amer. Acad. Pol. Sci., Annals, XII, 387-408) ; A. L. Lowell, Status of Our New Possessions (Harvard Law Review, XIII, 155-176); C. F. Randolph, Notes on the Law of Territorial Expansion ; T. Farrar, Manual of the Constitu- tion, 418-433. CASES. De Lima r. Bidwell (1901): 182 U. S., 1. Dooley v. United States (May, 1901): 182 U. S., 222. Downes v. Bidwell (1901) : 182 U. S., 244. Diamond Rings (Dec. 1901): Dooley v. United States [2d case] (Dec. 1901). SOURCES. Contemporaries, III, 113, 114, IV, 186-191; American History Leaflets, No. 32; M. Hill, Liberty Docu- ments, ch. xxiv; F. Wharton, Digest, 3-5, 354, 355 ; A. H. Howe, Insular Cases (House Documents, 56 Cong., 2 sess. (1901), No. 509) (briefs and arguments in the Porto Rican and Philippine cases). 206 DIPLOMATIC PAPERS [ 76. Paper No. 14. Legal Objections to the Orders in Council and Decrees. BIBLIOGRAPHY. Handbook, 19e, 20e, 73, 74, 85, 86, 88; Guide, 170-172; J. Winsor, Narrative and Critical, VII, 520, 521. HISTORICAL DISCUSSIONS. H. Adams, United States (see Index, s. v. Decree and Order in Council) ; T. Lyman, Diplo- macy of the United States (2d ed.), I, 406-422, II, 23-48 ; A. G. Stapleton, George Canning, 139-153 ; A. T. Mahan, Sea Power and French Revolution, II, 269-292, 313, 351-357; Arbitrations, I, 299-316, V, 4447-4456. TREATISES. T. A. Walker, International Law, 412-428; R. Phillimore, International Law (3d ed.), Ill, 311-313, 515-521 ; T. D. Woolsey, International Law (6th ed.), 206; Lawrence's Wheaton, 736-769w ; H. W. Halleck (Baker ed.), International Law, II, 325-339 ; F. DeCussy, Phases et Causes Celebres du Droit Maritime, II, 276-280. SOURCES. American State Papers, Foreign, III, 29-31, 203-206, 209-213, 220-220*, 259-291, 384, 405-407, 417-421, 431-433, 509-512, 609-612; F. Wharton, Digest, 359-361, 388; Contemporaries, 118, 120-122; Source-Book, 81; H. Adams, Albert Gallatin, 365n ; T. C. Hansard, Parliamen- tary Debates, X, 314-339, XXI, 1092-1163, XXIII, 486-547; J. Stephen, War in Disguise; G. Morris, Answer to War in Disguise. 77. Paper No. 15. Fishing Rights in and about the Gulf of St. Lawrence. BIBLIOGRAPHY. Handbook, 20e ; Guide, 141, 172, 174 ; J. Winsor, Narrative and Critical, VII, 170, 171, 523- 525 ; C. B. Elliott, United States and the Northeastern Fish- eries, 135-144 ; C. Isham, Fishery Question, 85-89. HISTORICAL DISCUSSIONS. Arbitrations, I, 426-430, 703- 76, 77] ORDERS IN COUNCIL 207 753 ; C. B. Elliott, United States and the Northeastern Fish- eries ; C. Isham, Fishery Question ; J. I. Doran, Our Fishery Rights in the North Atlantic ; J. G-. Elaine, Twenty Years of Congress, II, 615-637; J. B. Henderson, American Diplomatic Questions, 451-529 ; T. Lyman, Diplomacy of the United States (2d ed.), I, 114-117, II, 86-101 ; W. Kingsford, Canada, VII, 140, 141, 147, IX, 344, 345; L. Sabine, Report on the Prin- cipal Fisheries of the American Seas, 325-340, 389-489 (House Executive Documents, 32 Cong., 2 sess. (1853), No. 23); E. Schuyler, American Diplomacy, 404-420 ; J. J. Lalor, Cyclo- pedia, III, 941-944 ; J. B. McMaster, United States, IV, 270- 273, 457-469; P. H. Smith, Acadia, 313-318; W. E. Curtis, United States and Foreign Powers, 163-168; H. Y. Hind, Fraudulent Records; H. Y. Hind, Fisheries Commission Frauds ; W. V. Wells, Samuel Adams, III, 65, 149-152. TREATISES. T. Twiss, Law of Nations, I, 185, 191 ; F. Snow, Treatises and Topics, 427-470 ; F. Snow, International Law, 12; Lawrence's Wheaton, 312-314, 323-328/1, 462- 471; Dana's Wheaton, note 142; T. J. Lawrence, Interna- tional Law, 111 ; P. Cobbett, Leading Cases, 350-353, 364- 368 ; T. D. Woolsey, International Law (6th ed.), 59. SOURCES. Secret Journals of Congress, II, 148-1 67. Official correspondence : American State Papers, Foreign, III, 348- 407, 809-811, V, 675-696, 735-752 ; House Executive Docu- ments, 41 Cong., 3 sess. (1870), I, 407-433 ; 46 Cong., 2 sess. (1880), XXIV, No. 84 ; 49 Cong., 1 sess. (1885), I, 460-469 ; 49 Cong., 2 sess. (1886, 1887), I, 334-527, XVIII, No. 19, XXIV, No. 153. Treaties: Treaties and Conventions (ed. 1889), 371, 377, 415, 416, 449, 450, 452 ; 486, 487, 491, 498- 500 ; F. Snow, Treaties and Topics, 65, 79-81, 90-92, 98, 99. - Statutes of the United Kingdom, 59 Geo. Ill, ch. 38. Hali- fax Commission, Documents and Proceedings. F. Wharton, Diplomatic Correspondence of the Revolution (see Index, s. v. 208 DIPLOMATIC PAPERS [ Fisheries); F. Wharton, Digest, 301-308; J. D. Richard- son, Messages, V, 277, VII, 102-104, 225, VIII, 449, 500, 603-607, 620-630, 779, 780; J. Adams, Works, I, 381-384, 111,302, 327-339, 345, X, 131-133, 137, 159-161, 403-405; B. Franklin, Works (Bigelow ed.), VIII, 122n, 164n, 165n, 168?i ; J. Q. Adams, Duplicate Letters; J. Q. Adams, Memoirs (see Index, s. v. Fisheries) ; Contemporaries, II, 217, III, 128, IV, 173. 78. Paper No. 16. Doctrine of Recognition of New States. BIBLIOGRAPHY. Handbook, 19/, 20/, 79, 84, 91 ; Guide, 178. HISTORICAL DISCUSSIONS. J. H. Latane, United States and Spanish America, ch. ii; H. H. Bancroft, Pacific States^ VIII, 46-53, XI, 300-303 ; J. M. Callahan, Cuba and Interna- tional Relations, ch. v ; T. Lyman, Diplomacy of the United States (2d. ed.), II, 422-492; M. Bernard, Neutrality of Great Britain, 122-170; W. E. Curtis, United States and Foreign Powers, 76-78, 85 ; J. G. Blaine, Twenty Years of Congress, I, 571-580, 595-600. TREATISES. Lawrence's Wheaton, 36-51?*; Dana's Whea- ton, 20-27, notes 15, 16; T. J. Lawrence, International Law, 57-60; F. Snow, International Law, 8-10; A. S. Hershey, Recognition of Cuban Belligerency, Intervention and Recognition (Amer. Acad. Pol. Sci., Annals, VII, 450- 461, XI, 353-380); J. N. Pomeroy, International Law, 264- 312; W. E. Hall, International Law (4th ed.), 87-95; J. C. Bluntschli, Droit International (2d ed.), 67-73 ; C. Calvo, Droit International (4th ed.), I, 84-98; A. W. Heffter, Droit International, 23 ; T. D. Woolsey, International Law (6th ed.), 39-41 ; E. S. Creasy, Platform of International Law, 677-681; T. A. Walker, International Law, 115-118. 77-79] RECOGNITION AND MONROK DOCTRINE 209 CASES. Kennett /. Chambers (1852): 14 Howard, 38; 20 Curtis, 24. SOURCES. Contemporaries, III, 142, 145, 146; F. Wharton, Diplomatic Correspondence of the Revolution (see Index, s. v. Independence) ; F. Wharton, Digest, 70, 71 ; American State Papers, Foreign, IV, 173-183, 412-418, 818- 851, V, 794-797, VI, 1006-1014; Monroe's message on recog- nition, in J. D. Richardson, Messages, II, 116-118; Jackson's message on Texas, in J. D. Richardson, Messages, III, 265- 269 ; Folk's message on the French republic, in J. D. Richard- son, Messages, IV, 579, 580 ; J. Q. Adams, Memoirs (see Index, s. v. South America, South American independence) ; A. Gallatin, Writings, II, 73, 74, 240, 241 ; J. Madison, Writ- ings, III, 267 ; J. Mackintosh, Miscellaneous Works (ed. 1851), 747-768. 79. Paper No. 17. Extent of the Monroe Doctrine. BIBLIOGRAPHY. Handbook, 19/, 20/, 46, 72, 83, 89; Guide, 178; J. Winsor, Narrative and Critical, VII, 524; D. C. Gilman, James Monroe, 277-294. HISTORICAL DISCUSSIONS. D. C. Gilman, James Monroe^ ch. vii; J. H. Latane, United States' and Spanish America, 266-289 ; T. J. Lawrence, Essays on Disputed Questions, 89- 162; Foundations, ch. vii; M. D. de Beaumarchais, Doctrine de Monroe ; J. W. Foster, Century of American Diplomacy, 438-478 ; J. B. Henderson, American Diplomatic Questions, No. iv; F. Snow, Treaties and Topics, 237-427; W. E.Curtis, United States and Foreign Powers, 93-106; T. Lyman, Diplomacy of the United States (2d ed.), II, 467-489; J. B. McMaster, With the Fathers, 1-54; J. W. Burgess, Recent Pseudo- Monroeism (Political Science Quarterly, XI, 44-67) ; T. Roosevelt, American Ideals, No. xi ; J. B. Moore, Monroe Doctrine (Political Science Quarterly, XI, 1-29) ; H. Petin, 14 210 DIPLOMATIC PAPERS [ jfitats- Unis et la Doctrine de Monroe ; W. F. Reddaway, Mon- roe Doctrine; G. F. Tucker, Monroe Doctrine. TREATISES. Lawrence's Wheaton, 124?i, 155-159; Dana's Wheaton, note 36 ; T. A, Walker, International Law, 137- 150; C. Calvo, Droit International (4th ed.), I, 285-300, 337-350. SOURCES. Official correspondence : American State Papers, Foreign, V, 834-897, 900-905/907-910, 916-919, VI, 364- 366, 579, 580, 582, 583; Senate Executive Documents, 46 Cong., 2 sess. (1880), No. 112; 47 Cong., 1 sess. (1882), No. 194; 4 Cong., 1 sess. (1883), No. 26 (reprint of last three documents, in United States, Department of State, Correspond- ence relative to the Canal, Clayton-Bidwer Treaty, and the Monroe Doctrine). J. D. Richardson, Messages, II, 217- 219, IV, 212, 398, 539, 540, 581-583, VII, 61-63, 99-101, 129, IX, 632, 655-658; J. Q. Adams, Memoirs, VI, 163, 177- 215; R. Rush, Residence at the Court of London, especially chs. xx-xxiv; G. Canning, in R. Phillimore, International Law (3d ed.), II, 545-559, III, 886-896; F. Wharton, Digest, I, 57-68; American History Leaflets, No. 4; Con- temporaries, III, 143-150; M. Hill, Liberty Documents, ch. xx. 80. Paper No. 18. Application of a Personal Status in a Foreign Country. BIBLIOGRAPHY. Handbook, 20^. HISTORICAL DISCUSSIONS. Arbitrations, III, 2449-3424. TREATISES. Lawrence's Wheaton, ~L73n-177n, 5QSn, 917- 930; R. Phillimore, International Law (3d ed.), I, 443-459, II, 3-7; J. N. Pomeroy, International Law, 204-214; W. E. Hall, International Law (4th ed.), 62, 71-74, 87; J. C. Bluntschli, Droit International (2d ed), 221-234; F. Snow, International Law, 15, 24; J. B. Moore, Extrater- ritorial Crime and the Cutting Case,. 79-82] PERSONAL STATUS 211 SOURCES. F. Snow, Cases and Opinions, 172-174, 225- 229. Cutting case: House Executive Documents, 49 Cong., 1 sess. (1886), XXXV, No. 371 ; Case of the American A. A". Cutting. 81. Paper No. 19. Responsibility of a Government for not carrying out a Treaty. BIBLIOGRAPHY. Handbook, 209. HISTORICAL DISCUSSIONS. Arbitrations, V, 4457-4485 ; W. G. Simmer, Andrew Jackson, (ed. 1890) 170, 171, 295, 343- 348, (ed. 1900) 216-218, 344, 402-408; M. Bernard, Lectures on Diplomacy, 163-205. TREATISES. E. W. Huffcut, International Liability for Mob Injuries (Amer. Acad. Pol. Sci., Annals, II, 69-84) ; J. Bryce, Legal and Constitutional Aspects of the Lynching at New Orleans (New Review, IV, 385-397) ; F. Snow, Interna- tional Law, 22, 31 ; C. Calvo, Droit International (3d ed.), Ill, 142-156, 388-393; W. E. Hall, International Law, 345-349 ; Lawrences Wheaton, 455-460 ; H. W. Halleck, International Law (Baker ed.), I, 231-234, 237-242; J. W. Burgess, Federal Government and International Responsi- bility (Political Science Quarterly, VI, 338-346). CASES. Foster v. Neilson (1829): 2 Peters, 253, 314; 8 Curtis, 108, 121. Head Money Cases (1884): 112 U. S., 580, 597. Geofroy v. Riggs (1890) : 133 U. S., 258. SOURCES. Official correspondence on New Orleans mobs : Senate Executive Documents, 32 Cong., 1 sess. (1851), I, pp. 60-66, IX, No. 86 ; House Executive Documents, 52 Cong., 1 sess. (1891), I, 658-728. F. Wharton, Digest, 67, 148c, 318 ; F. Snow, Cases and Opinions, 181-183. 82. Paper No. 20. Government of Military Con- quests, previous to Cession. BIBLIOGRAPHY. Handbook, 19#, 20#, 42, 69, 91 ; F. 212 DIPLOMATIC PAPERS [ Snow, Cases and Opinions, xxxv; A. P. C. Griffin, List of Books on Cuba ; A. S. Taylor, JBibliographia Calif ornica. HISTORICAL DISCUSSIONS. E. G. Bourne, Essays in Histor- ical Criticism, No. ix ; T. H. Hittell, California, II, 458- 468, 573-637, 655-672 ; H. H. Bancroft, Pacific States, VIII, 448, 529, 530, XVII, chs. ix-xvii. TREATISES. R. D. Hunt, Legal Status of California, 1846-1849 (Amer. Acad. Pol. Sci., Annals, XII, 387-408) ; C. Becker, Acquisition and Government of Dependent Territory (Amer. Acad. Pol. Sci., Annals, XVI, 404-420) ; E. Freund, Control of Dependencies through Protectorates (Political Science Quarterly, XIV, 19-38) ; C. Calvo, Droit Interna- tional (4th ed.), IV, 212-235, 387-395; J. Kent, Commentaries, I, 93n . ; Lawrence's Wheaton, 682-685^; Dana's Wheaton^ note 169 , H. W. Halleck, International Law (Baker ed.), II, 444_460, 493-507; R. Phillimore, International Law (3d ed.), Ill, 812-816; W. E. Hall, International Law (4th ed.), 481-504, 587-595. CASES. F. Snow, Cases and Opinions, 364-380. United States v. Rice (1819): 4 Wheaton, 246; 4 Curtis, 391. Fleming v. Page (1849): 9 Howard, 603; 18 Curtis, 278. Jecker v. Montgomery (1851): 13 Howard, 498; 19 Curtis, 615. New Orleans v. Steamship Co. (1874): 20 Wallace, 387. Mechanics Bank v. Union Bank (1874): 22 Wallace, 276. Harrison v. Myer (1875): 92 U. S., 111. Gates v. Goodloe (1879): 101 U. S., 612. SOURCES. Military government of Mexico : House Execu- tive Documents, 29 Cong., 2 sess. (1846), No. 19; 30 Cong., 2 sess. (1849), No. 47. Military government of California : W. Colton, Three Years in California, 17, 47, 55, 65; W. T. Sherman, Memoirs, I, 30, 31, 36, 37, 40, 41. F. Wharton, Digest, 3, 4, 354, 355. 82-84] MOSQUITO QUESTION AND FILIBUSTERS 213 83. Paper No. 21. The Mosquito Question. BIBLIOGRAPHY. Handbook, 20^, 80, 89; I. D.Travis, British Rule in Central America, 34-36 ; I. D. Travis, Clayton-Bulwer Treaty, 309-312 ; D. C. Gilman, James Mon- roe, 285, 286. HISTORICAL DISCUSSIONS. L. M. Keasbey, Nicaragua Canal and the Monroe Doctrine, chs. viii-xii ; H. H. Bancroft, Pacific States, III, ch. xii; P. Cobbett, Leading Cases, 353, 354; F. Snow, Treaties and Topics, 326-347 ; I. D. Travis, Clayton- Bulwer Treaty ; J. C. Rodrigues, Panama Canal, 26-37, 173-232 ; I. D. Travis, British Rule in Central America ; J. Schouler, United States, V, 174-177, 310-312, 339-342, 365, 454 ; J. B. Henderson, American Diplomatic Questions, 159-167; C. P. Lucas, Historical Geography of the British Colonies, II, ch. ix ; T. J. Lawrence, Essays on Disputed Questions, No. iii ; G. T. Curtis, James Buchanan, I, ch. xxii, II, ch. v. TREATISES. Lawrence's Wheaton, 70n, l\n, 369, 370, SOURCES. Official correspondence : Senate Executive Docu- ments, 31 Cong., 2 sess. (1851), No. 43; 32 Cong., 2 sess. (1853), Nos. 12, 27; House Executive Documents, 31 Cong., 1 sess. (1850), No. 75; Parliamentary Papers, (1856) LX, [2052], [2107]; (1860) LXVIII, [2748] ; F. Wharton, Digest, 145, 146, 150/; 287-297. G. Henderson, British Honduras,- E. G. Squier, Nicaragua, II, 250-302, 412-452; P. F. Stout, Nicaragua, chs. xvii-xxvii. 84. Paper No. 22. Responsibility for Filibusters. BIBLIOGRAPHY. Handbook, 29^, 91; Guide, 199. HISTORICAL DISCUSSIONS. J. J. Lalor, Cyclopaedia, II, 184; J. M. Callahan, Cuba and International Relations, chs. vii-ix; J. H. Latane, United States and Spanish America, 107-113, 148; Dupuy de Lome, in C. Carlisle, Laws of Neutrality, I. 214 DIPLOMATIC PAPERS [ TREATISES. Lawrence's Wheaton, 728-733 ; T. A. Walker, International Law, 438-457 ; W. E. Hall, International Law (4th ed.), 613-616, 627, 628; H. W. Halleck, International Law (Baker ed.), II, 199-204 (with the notes). SOURCES. F. Wharton, Digest, 60, 395a, 402 ; F. Snow, Cases and Opinions, 402-420, 443-459 ; C. Carlisle, Laws of Neutrality (documents and cases). 85. Paper No. 23. Effect of Lincoln's Blockade Proclamations. BIBLIOGRAPHY. Handbook, 19J, 207*; Guide, 212. HISTORICAL DISCUSSIONS. J. R. Soley, Blockade and Cruisers, chs. ii-vi; Nicolay and Hay, Abraham Lincoln, IV, ch. xv ; M. Bernard, Neutrality of Great Britain, 79, 80, 90, 91, 226-246; J. W.Foster, Century of American Diplomacy \ 366, 367; J. F. Rhodes, United States, III, 417-421w. TREATISES. W. E. Hall, International Law (4th ed.), 39- 42, 718-725; T. D. Woolsey, International Law (6th ed.), 202-206; F. Snow, International Law, 62, 63; Law- rence's Wheaton, 819-850^; Dana's Wlieaton, notes 233, 235; T. A. Walker, International Law, 460, 516-52G; F. Wharton, Commentaries, 233-235 ; T. J. Lawrence, Inter- national Law, 270; J. Kent, Commentaries, I, 143-153; J. P. Deane, Law of Blockade ; C. Calvo, Droit International (4th ed.); V, 145-147; W. DeBurgh, Maritime International Law, ch. vii. CASES. F. Snow, Cases and Opinions, 490-502. Prize Cases (1863): 2 Black, 635; 4 Miller, 876; Lawrence's Wheaton, Suppl., 13-33; F. Snow, Cases and Opinions, 254-259. SOURCES. Lincoln's blockade proclamations : J. D. Rich- ardson, Messages, VI, 14, 15 ; A. Lincoln, Works, II, 35, 38. American Annual Cyclopaedia, (1861) 70-72, (1862) 84-86] CONTINUOUS VOYAGES 215 193-197, (1863) 765-769; F. Wharton, Digest, 69, 359- 365 ; F. B. Butts, A Cruise along the blockade T. E. Taylor, Running the Blockade ; W. Watson, Adventures of a blockade- runner J. Wilkinson, Narrative of a Blockade-runner ; Con- temporaries, IV, 116. 86. Paper No. 24. Doctrine of Continuous Voyages. BIBLIOGRAPHY. Handbook, 20A, 68, 176; Guide, 170, 212 ; F. Snow, Cases and Opinions, xxxix. HISTORICAL DISCUSSIONS. Arbitrations, I, 694, 695, V, 3928-3935; M. Bernard, Neutrality of Great Britain, 299- 319 ; A. T. Mahan, Sea Power and French Revolution, II, 268, 269 ; J. M. Callahan, Diplomatic History of the Southern Confederacy, 171-176; R. Hildreth, United States, V, 562- 565, 657, 658 ; J. B. McMaster, United States, III, 222-228 ; T. Lyman, Diplomacy of the United States (2d ed.), II, 5-9; H. Adams, United States, II, 327-329, III, 44, 45, 50-53, 409-411 ; F. Bancroft, W. H. Seward, II, 376-380. TREATISES. T. J. Lawrence, International Law, 276; G. Gessner, Reforme du Droit Maritime de la Guerre (Revue de Droit International, VII, 236-255) ; Principes appliques dans V Affaire du Springbok (Revue de Droit International, XIV, 328-331) ; R Phillimore, International Law (3d ed.), Ill, 382-384; W. E. Hall, International Law (4th ed.), 694?i, 695 ; T. D. Woolsey, International Law (6th ed.), 207 ; J. C. Bluntschli, Droit International (2d ed.), 468?i ; C. Calvo, Droit International (4th ed.), V, 43-50 ; Lawrence's Wheaton, llln-HSn, 8Wn, 8l7n, 960-976; Dana's Wheaton, note 231; F. Wharton, Commentaries, 233; T. A. Walker, International Law, 512-516, 525 ; F. Snow, International Law, 65 ; H. W. Halleck, International Law (Baker ed.), II, 336-339; R. Kleen, Contrabande de Guerre, 30-37; H. Glass, Marine International Law, 95-97 ; T. Twiss, Doctrine 216 DIPLOMATIC PAPERS [ of Continuous Voyages; T. E. Holland, Manual of Naval Prize, 15, 22, 38>z ; J. Kent, Commentaries, 85?i; L. Gessner, Condemnation of the Cargo of the Springbok; T. Twiss, Belligerent Rig /Us on tlie High Seas, 18-32. CASES. The Essex (1805): 5 C. Robinson, 369; P. Cob- bett, Leading Cases, 334. The William (1806) : 5 C. Rob- inson, 385 ; F. Snow, Cases and Opinions^ 505-509 ; P. Cobbett, Leading Cases, 333, 334. Jecker v. Montgomery (1855): 18 Howard, 114; 1 Miller, 94. The Stephen Hart (1863) : Blatchford's Prize Cases, 387 ; F. Snow, Cases and Opinions, 509-514; P. Cobbett, Leading Cases, 335,336. The Bermuda (1865) : 3 Wallace, 514. The Springbok (1866) : 5 Wallace, 1; P. Cobbett, Leading Cases, 337. The Peter- hoff (1866): 5 Wallace, 28; P. Cobbett, Leading Cases, 338, 339. SOURCES. Seizure of the Peterhoff '; Papers relating to the Illegal Seizure of the Springbok ; F. Wharton, Digest, 362, 375, 388; J. Madison, Writings, II, 213, 214, 229, 391; American Annual Cyclopaedia (1863), 765-769. Official cor- respondence: Parliamentary Papers, 1863, LXXII, [3119], pp. 280-293, [3183], [3195]; House Executive Documents, 37 Cong., 1 sess. (1862), I, 293-306, 381 ; 38 Cong., 1 sess. (1863), I, 536, 539-557. 87. Paper No. 25. Right of Expatriation. BIBLIOGRAPHY. Handbook, 20^, 74 ; F. Snow, Cases and Opinions, xxiv. HISTORICAL DISCUSSIONS. J. J. Lalor, Cyclopaedia, II, 959- 963; Arbitrations, III, 2560-2583. TREATISES. C. Calvo, Droit International (4th ed.), II, 38-41, 58, 64-68, 71-73, 115, 116, 126; Lawrence's Wheaton, 160n, 891-930; Dana's Wheatoti, notes 49, 78; G. H. Yea- mau, Allegiance and Citizenship; P. Webster, Law of Citi- 86,87] RIGHT OF EXPATRIATION 217 zenship ; J. T. Morse, Expatriation and Naturalization (North American Review, CVI, 612-629); J. Kent, Commentaries, II, 43-50; Alexander Cockburn, Nationality ; C. P. Daly, Naturalization ; T. A. Walker, International Law, I, 350- 360 ; Tucker's Blackstone, I, 96 ; W. E. Hall, International Law (4tb ed.), 239-255; F. Wharton, Conflict of Laws, 2-4, 40; R. Phillimore, International Law (3d ed.)? I> 452, 453, 446-453, IV, 29, 30, 274-279. CASES. ^Eneas Macdonald's Case (1745) : 18 Howell, State Trials, 857. Talbot v. Janson (1795) : 3 Dallas, 133; 1 Cur- tis, 128. Isaac William's Case (1799): F. Wharton, State Trials, 652-658. Murray v. Schooner Charming Betsy (1804) : 2 Cranch, 64; 1 Curtis, 450. The Santissima Trini- dad (1822): 7 Wheaton, 283, 347; 5 Curtis, 268, 278. Inglis v. Trustees of the Sailor's Snug Harbor (1830) : 3 Peters, 99, 125; 8 Curtis, 305, 317. Shanks v. Dupont (1830): 3 Peters, 242; 8 Curtis, 395. Minor v. Happersett (1874): 21 Wallace, 162. SOURCES. F. Wharton, Digest, 171, 172; F. Snow, Cases and Opinions, 213-219 ; Essay on Naturalization and Allegiance ; D. Webster, Works, VI, 454 ; T. Jefferson, Writ- ings (Washington ed.), 73; J. Adams, Works, IX, 313, 314, 321, X, 282. Opinions of the Attorneys General, VIII, 157, IX, 62-64, 356-363, XII, 319-326, XIV, 154-157, 295- 301. Report of the Royal Commission on the Laws of Naturalization and Allegiance {Parliamentary Papers, 1868- 69, XXV, [4109]). Official correspondence: Tousig Case, House Executive Documents, 33 Cong., 1 sess. (1854), VIII, No. 41 ; Koszta Case, House Executive Documents, 33 Cong., 1 sess. (1854), XI, No. 91; compulsory military service, Senate Executive Documents, 36 Cong., 1 sess. (1860), XI, No. 38. Naturalization treaties: Treaties and Conventions (ed. 1889), 37, 38, 43, 49, 66-68, 563-565, 790, 791; F. 218 DIPLOMATIC PAPERS [ Snow, Treaties and Topics, 230-234; F. Wharton, Conflict of Laws, 4/i. 88. Paper No. 26. Consequential Damages. BIBLIOGRAPHY. Handbook, 20i, 76; Guide, 212; Arbitrations, I, ch. xiv, notes, IV, ch. Ixv, notes. HISTORICAL DISCUSSIONS. Arbitrations, I, 555-560, 623- 628, IV, 4057-4178; C. Gushing, Treaty of Washington, ch. ii; C. F. Adams, Charles Francis Adams, 307-315, 357, 380- 397; C. C. Beaman, National and Private Alabama Claims; G. Bemis, Precedents of American Neutrality ; M. Bernard, Neutrality of Great Britain, 151-170, 331-439, 480-496; J. G. Elaine, Twenty Tears of Congress, II, ch. xx; J. W. Foster, Century of American Diplomacy, 384-387, 422-428. TREATISES. W. E. Hall, International Law (4th ed.), 217, 221-225; H. W. Halleck, International Law (Baker ed.), II, 183-195; T. A. Walker, International Law, 459-502; R. Phillimore, International Law (3d ed.), Ill, 250-282; Dana's Wheaton, 425, 428, 435-439, note 215 ; F. Snow, Interna- tional Law, 58-60 ; T. D. Woolsey, International Law, 163-170; J. C. Bluntschli, Opinion impartiale sur la Ques- tion de V Alabama (JKevue de Droit International, II, 452- 485) ; T. J. Lawrence, International Law, 258-263. SOURCES. Official correspondence : Foreign Relations (1863), part i, pp. 4-9, 32-47, 59-79, 89-93, 157-160, 183, 256, 306- 308,356-364,379-381,392-396; (1865) part i, pp. 311, 316-320, 335, 395-397, 554-561, 576-610, 631-650, 660, 668-670; (1866) part i, pp. 59, 68, 74, 89 ; (1867) part i, pp. 36, 41-43, 75, 123, 191-193, 209-211; (1868) part i, pp. 159-173 (same documents in House Executive Documents, No. 1, of the sessions of Con- gress covered by these years) ; W. H. Seward, Works (Baker ed.), V, 408-410, 446-470, 475, 476. Geneva arbitration: House Executive Documents, 42 Cong., 3 sess. (1873), I, parts 87-89] CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES 219 ii-v. F. Wharton, Digest, 227, 396-402&, 405; F. Snow, Cases and Opinions, 402-461 ; Treaties and Conventions (ed. 1889), 413-430. J. Bigelow, France and the Confederate Navy ; J. D. Bulloch, Secret Service of the Confederate States, I, chs. ii, v; R. Semmes, Service Afloat; A. Sinclair, Two Years in the Alabama J. C. B. Davis, Mr. Fish and the Alabama Claims. American Annual Cyclopaedia, (1862) 380-384, (1863) 340-350, (1867) 267-272, (1868) 215-217, (1870) 227, 228, (1871) 253-263, (1872) 239-263; Annual Register (1872), part i, 88-118. 89. Paper No. 27. Questions of the Isthmus Canal. BIBLIOGRAPHY. Handbook, 2Q/, 72, 78, 83; D. C. Gil- man, James Monroe, 285, 286, 289-291 ; Brookings and Ring- wait, Brief s for Debate, No. xxv. . HISTORICAL DISCUSSIONS. J. H. Latane, United States and Spanish America, ch. iv ; F. Snow, Treaties and Topics, 326-347; I. D. Travis, Clayton- Bulwer Treaty; J. C. Ro- digues, Panama Canal; A. T. Mali an, Interest of America in Sea Power, No. iii; L. M. Keasbey, Nicaragua Canal and the Monroe Doctrine ; E. R. Johnson, Nicaragua Canal and Economic Development (Amer. Acad. Pol. Sci., Annals, VII, 38_43) | J. w. Miller, Advantages of the Nicaragua Route (Amer. Acad. Pol. Sci., Annals, VII, 32-37) ; J. A. Fairlie, Economic Effects of Ship Canals (Amer. Acad. Pol. Sci., Annals, XI, 54-78) ; L. M. Keasbey, Clay ton- Bulwer Treaty (Amer. Acad. Pol. Sci., Annals, XIV, 285-309) ; P. C. Hains, Canal from a Military Point of View (Amer. Acad. Pol. Sci., Annals, XVII, 397-408); W. B. Munro, Neutralization of the Suez Canal (Amer. Acad. Pol. Sci., Annals, XVII, 409-430) ; T. J. Lawrence, JZssays on Disputed Questions, Nos. ii, iii ; M. M. de Peralta, El Canal Interoceanico ; J. B. Henderson, American Diplomatic Questions, ch. iv. 220 DIPLOMATIC PAPERS [ TREATISES. R. Phillimore, International Law (3d ed.), I, 304-311 ; C. Calvo, Droit International (4th ed.), I, 507-516; W. E. Hall, International Law (4th ed.), 107-109, 111. SOURCES. Report of the Isthmian Canal Commission : Senate Documents, 57 Cong., 1 sess. (1901), No. 54. J. D. Rich- ardson, Messages, VII, 610, 611, VIII, 327, 328. American Annual Cyclopcedia, New Series (see the General Index) ; F. Wharton, Digest, 287-297; Ayon, Consider aciones sobre la Cuestion de Limites Territorial entre las Republicas de Nicaragua y Costa Rica. 90. Paper No. 28. Control of Seal Catching. BIBLIOGRAPHY. Handbook, 20;, 77; American History Leaflets, No. 6; F. Wharton, Digest, 309. HISTORICAL DISCUSSIONS. S. B. Stanton, Beliring Sea Dis- pute, ch. vi; S. B. Stanton, Behring Sea Controversy ; Arbitra- tions, I, 755-960, III, 2123-2131, V, 4759-4767, 5067; J. Stanley-Brown, Bering Sea Controversy from an Economic Standpoint (Yale Review, II, 196-210); J. B. Henderson, American Diplomatic Questions, 3-29, 513-525 ; P. Cobbett, Leading Cases, 359-363 ; E. J. Phelps, Behring Sea Contro- versy (Harper's Magazine, LXXXII, 766-774). TREATISES. C. Calvo, Droit International (4th ed.), I, 471, 489, VI, 370-446 ; T. J. Lawrence, International Law, 106 ; W. E. Hall, International Law (4th ed.), 146-166, 267rc ; Dana's Wheaton, 168-171 ; T. D. Woolsey, International Law (6th ed.), 59, 60; F. Snow, Treaties and Topics, 471-509; T. A.Walker, International Law, 175-204; T. B. Browning, Behring Sea Controversy (Law Quarterly Review, VII, 128); G. H. Knott, Arbitration of Behring Sea Contro- versy (American Law Review, XXVII, 684). SOURCES. Official correspondence, 1886-1896 : British and Foreign State Papers, LXXIX, 1240-1306, LXXXI, 89-91] CONTROL OF SEAL CATCHING 221 1072-1091, LXXXIII, 306-357, LXXXIV, 453-590, LXXXV, 1158-1169, LXXXVI, 1312-1320, LXXXVII, 1119-1165, LXXXVIII, 8-13, LXXXIX, 776-957 (the same documents are in Foreign Relations, and in House Executive Documents, No. 1, of the several sessions of Congress covered by these years. See the Indexes, s. v. Bering Sea). Bering Sea arbi- tration: Senate Executive Documents, 53 Cong., 2 sess. (1894), VII, No. 177. J. D. Richardson, Messages, IX, 14, 110, 146, 313, 394, 494-498, 583, 630, 631, 691-693. American History Leaflets, No. 6; Contemporaries, IV, 178; F. Snow, Cases and Opinions, 184-194, 521-528; F. Wharton, Digest, 7, 8, 32, 159, 309 ; Annual Register (1892), part i, 346-348; American Annual Cyclopaedia, (1891) 834-836, (1893) 79-86. 91. Paper No. 29. Protectorate of Cuba. BIBLIOGRAPHY. Handbook, 20/, 67, 72, 78,79, 82; A. P. C. Griffin, List of Books on Cuba. HISTORICAL DISCUSSIONS. J. H. Latane, United States and Spanish America, ch. iii; J. M. Callahan, Cuba and Interna- tional Relations, ch. xiv; T. S. Woolsey, America's Foreign Policy, 7-111. TREATISES. W. E. Hall, International Law (4th ed.), 130- 136; T. Twiss, Law of Nations, 26,30; C. Calvo, Droit International (4th ed.), I, 203, 204, 363, 364; C. Carlisle, Laws of Neutrality, I, II. SOURCES. Treaty of peace with Spain, and documents : Senate Documents, 55 Cong., 3 sess. (1899), No. 62, part i. Reports of Governors of Cuba : House Documents, 56 Cong., 1 sess. (1899), VII; 2 sess. (1900). Contemporaries, IV, 180-184; Source-Book, 140-144; American Annual Cyclopaedia (1899), 236-238 ; International Tear Book (1900), 279, 280. 222 GOVERNMENT PAPERS [ 92. Paper No. 30. The Policy of the Open Door. BIBLIOGRAPHY. Handbook, 20;, 66, 78; A. P. C. Grif- fin, List of Books on Colonization, 115-131. HISTORICAL DISCUSSIONS. J. Strong, Expansion; C. A. Conant, United States in the Orient ; A. T. Mahan, Problem of Asia, Nos. i, ii; American Academy of Political and Social Science, Foreign Policy of the United States ; J. M. Callahan, American Relations in the Pacific and the Far East, 72-113, 155-164; W. E. Griffis, America in the Fast, 58-91, 211-225; P. S. Reinsch, World Politics ; I. Nitobe, Intercourse between the United States and Japan, eh. iii. SOURCES. Official correspondence : Foreign Relations, 1899- 1900 (see Indexes, under China) ; Contemporaries, IV, 193. Annual messages of the Presidents, 1900, 1901. American Annual Cyclopaedia (1900), 94 ; International Year Book (1900), 899. 93. Materials for the Weekly Papers in Govern- ment 12. The bibliography of American government has not yet been worked into convenient form : a few aids are listed in Hand- book, 13. Titles of the books most suitable for Government 12 are printed in the lists of Text-books, Essential Reference Books, and Special Collections in Government (Handbook, 9, 10, 13) ; in the specific references inserted in the list of lectures in Government (Handbook, 21) ; and in the refer- ences to thirty selected topics in Government (Handbook, 94-123). Use freely the cross references to the Handbook at the head of each paper. The secondary books are not very numerous, and most of the useful titles are included in some of the sections of the Handbook just cited ( 9, 10, 13, 21, 94-123). Treatises on American Constitutional Law (select list in Handbook, 92-94] GROWTH OF URBAN POPULATION 223 treatises on American government, and treatises on interna- tional law (Foundations^ 78(7) touch on many governmental relations. Much of the available material on government appears in periodicals : the best for our purpose are Municipal Affairs ; Political Science Quarterly / Yale Review ; American His- torical Review / Quarterly Journal of Economics ; Quarterly Journal of Political Economy / Atlantic Monthly ; Forum ; North America?i Jteview ; Nation ; also the publications of the American Historical Association, American Academy of Polit- ical and Social Science, and American Economic Association. These sets and others can be reached so far as they contain material on public law and public science through A. L. Jones, Index to Legal Periodical Literature (2 vols.). Col- lected essays (often very useful and very hard to locate pre- vious to Fletcher's second edition) are carefully catalogued in W. I. Fletcher, " A. L. A" Index to General Literature (2d ed., 1901). On source materials on government there is as yet no proper guide; the lists of lectures (Handbook, 21) and the special references below (Handbook, 94-123) attempt some guidance to first-hand materials. Reports of judicial cases often deter- mining questions of national, State, or local government are enumerated in Handbook, 31c. 94. Paper No. i. Growth of Urban Population. BIBLIOGRAPHY. Handbook, 21a; C. D. Wright, Prac- tical Sociology, 9, 66, 72 ; E. C. Lunt, Key to United States Census, 36, 37; Municipal Affairs, V, 227-230. HISTORICAL DISCUSSIONS. A. F. Weber, The Growth of Cities (Columbia University, Studies in History, Economics, and Public Law, XI) ; A. B. Hart, Practical Essays, ^N"o. viii ; D. F. Wilcox. Study of City Government, ch. v ; II. G. Wad- 224 GOVERNMENT PAPERS [ lin, C. Boyd, F. A. Bushee, in Amer. Stat. Assoc., Publica- tions, II, 159-173, III, 416-428, VI, 239-274; A. F. Weber, in Municipal Affairs, V, 367-375 ; E. J. James, Growth of Great Cities (Amer. Acad. Pol. Sci., Annals, XIV, 1-30) ; H. J. Fletcher, Remedies (Forum, XIX, 737-745) ; C. D. Wright, Practical Sociology, chs. viii, ix. SOURCES. U. S. Census Bureau, Report on Population of the Eleventh Census, 2 vols. ; U. S. Census Bureau, Bulletins of Twelfth Census, Nos. 62, 65, 70, 103. 95. Paper No. 2. Theory of the Social Compact. BIBLIOGRAPHY. Handbook, 21, 316, 132a, 139. HISTORICAL DISCUSSIONS. G. P. Fisher, Jefferson and the Social Compact Theory ( Yale Review, II, 403-417) ; A. C. McLaughlin, Social Compact (American Historical Revievi, V, 467-490) ; W. W. Willoughby, Nature of the State, chs. iv, v ; A. L. Lowell, Essays on Government, No. iv ; D. G. Ritchie, Social Contract Theory (Political Science Quarterly, VI, 656-676). TREATISES. J. A. Jameson, Treatise on Co?istitutiona>l Conventions, ch. ii; W. A. Duer, Constitutional Jurisprudence, lect. ii; D. Webster, Works, I, ch. vii; T. D. Woolsey, Political Science, I, 36, 37, 61-70; J. R. Tucker, Consti- tution, 43; E. Mulford, The Nation, ch. iii; Tayler, Right of the State to be. SOURCES. J. J. Rousseau, Du Contrat Social, book i, chs. iii-ix, book ii, chs. i-v ; R. Hooker, Ecclesiastical Polity, book i, 10; John Locke, Two Treatises on Government, book ii, chs. viii, ix ; T. Hobbes, Leviathan, xiv, xv, xvii, xviii ; Thomas Paine, Common Sense ; E. Burke, Reflections on the Revolution in France, II, 368. 94-97] RELIGIOUS LIBERTY 225 96. Paper No. 3. Theory of Religious Liberty. BIBLIOGRAPHY. Handbook, 2la, Sib, 140c ; G. W. Paschal, Constitution Analyzed, 254, 255. HISTORICAL DISCUSSIONS. J. Bryce, Commonwealth, II, chs. cvi, cvii; W. E. H. Lecky, Democracy and Liberty, I, 505-509 ; L. J. Jennings, Eighty Years of Republican Govern- ment, ch. ix ; P. Schaff, Church and /State in the United States (Amer. Hist. Assoc., Papers, II, 391-543) ; G. J. Bayles, Amer- ican Civil Church Law (Political Science Quarterly, XIV, 511-520) ; monographs on Bishop Hill, New England, Mary- land, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, Virginia, in Johns Hopkins University, Studies, X, Nos. 1-6, 8, 9, XI, Nos. 5, 6, XII, No. 4, XVIII, Nos. 10-12; H. V. Ames, Constitutional Amendments, 173. TREATISES. H. Von Hoist, Constitutional Law, 74, 78; T. M. Cooley, Constitutional Law, ch. xiii; F. Wharton, Commentaries, 553 ; J. N. Pomeroy, Constitutional Law, 148 ; T. M. Cooley, Constitutional Limitations, ch. xiii ; H. C. Black, Handbook of Constitutional Law, 196-198; R. Phillimore, International Law, II, 343-363 ; American Law Jteview, XXVI, 789, XXXII, 581. SOURCES. Bills of Rights and Colonial Charters, in B. P. Poore, Charters and Constitutions; S. G. Fisher, Evolution of the Constitution, 190-199. 97. Paper No. 4. Citizenship by Annexation. BIBLIOGRAPHY. Handbook, 21&, 40, 42, 74, 80, 82, 132, 140t7; Max Farrand, Legislation of Congress for Government of Territories, 95, 98 ; A. H. Howe, Insular Cases (see Hand- book, 42, 75). HISTORICAL DISCUSSIONS. Arbitrations, IV, 2509-2517;' W. Reid, Problems of Expansion. TREATISES. C. F. Randolph, Notes on Law of Territorial 15 226 GOVERNMENT PAPERS [ Expansion ; W. L. Scruggs, Ambiguous Citizenship (Political Science Quarterly, I, 199-205); Lawrence's Wheaton, 893- 900 ; Boyd Winchester, Citizenship in its International Rela- tionships (American Law Review, XXXI, 504) ; R. Phillimore, International Law, I, 443-453 ; W. E. Hall, International Law (4th ed.), 593-595. SOURCES. M. Hill, Liberty Documents, ch. xxiv; compare sources on territorial status (Handbook, 42, 82) ; Philippine Information Society, Facts about the Filipinos; Philippine Commissioners, Reports ; A. H. Howe, The Insular Cases (see Handbook, 42, 75). 98. Paper No. 5. Rights of Indians. BIBLIOGRAPHY. Handbook, 215, 21;, 35, 50 (with cases), 65, 132, 132c, 148?; G. W. Paschal, Constitution Annotated, 110-112 ; L. A. Jones, Index to Legal Periodical Literature, II, 229; W. I. Fletcher, "A. L. A." Index to General Publi- cations (2d ed.), 292, 293. HISTORICAL DISCUSSIONS. F. W. Blackmar, Indian Educa- tion (Amer. Acad. Pol. Sci., Annals, II, 813-837); F. A. Walker, Indian Question; P. C. Garrett, R. W. Hill, J. M. Stuart, in National Conference of Charities and Corrections, Proceedings, 1892, pp. 23, 34, 66 ; H. H. Bancroft, Essays and Miscellany, ch. iv ; J. E. Greene, in Amer. Antiquarian Society, Proceedings, new series, XI, 23 ; J. B. Harrison, Latest Studies on Indian Reservations ; Bureau of American Ethnology, Annual Report, 1896-97. TREATISES. E. C. Mason, Veto Power, 41 ; F. Wliarton, Commentaries, 26, 265, 434, 585 ; S. F. Miller, Lectures on the Constitution, 401-403, 425, 469-473 ; J. B. Thayer, A People without Law (Atlantic Monthly, LXVIII, 540, 676) ; W. H. Hornblower, Legal Status of Indians (American Bar Associa- tion, Report, 1891); A. Abbott, Indians and Law (Harvard 97-99] RIGHTS OF INDIANS 227 Law Review, II, 169) ; J. Kent, Commentaries, I, 257, 258; L. E. Textor, Official Relations between the United States and the Sioux Indians. SOURCES. Commissioner of Indian Affairs, Annual Report ; Indian Commission, Annual Report ; Executive Committee of the Indian Rights Association, Annual Report ; Dawes Com- mission, Reports ; T. J. Morgan, Present Phase of the Indian Question (1891) ; American Bar Association, Report, 1898, p. 351 ; F. E. Leupp, Notes among the Indians of the Southwest ; Revised Statutes, chs. iii, iv; Treaties, in Statutes at Large, VII. 99. Paper No. 6. Limitations on Constitutional Conventions. BIBLIOGRAPHY. Handbook, 19c, 21c, 3la, 31t7, 36 (with cases), 132, 141a; A. B. Hart, Federal Government, 469; L. A. Jones, Index to Legal Periodicals, II, 90, 93. HISTORICAL DISCUSSIONS. H. V. Ames, Constitutional Amendments, 1, 176-188; W. C. Morey, Genesis of a Written Constitution (Amer. Acad. Pol. Sci., Annals, I, 529, 557); F. N. Thorpe, Recent Constitution-making (Amer. Acad. Pol. Sci., Annals, II, 145-201) ; J. H. Dougherty, Constitu- tions of New York (Political Science Quarterly, III, 489- 519, IV, 230-260) ; J. Bryce, American Commonwealth, I, chs. xxxi, xxxii, App. pp. 667-669 ; J. F. Jameson, Early Uses of Word Convention (American Historical Review? , III, 477- 489) ; C. R. Woodruff, American Governmental Methods (Po- litical Science Quarterly, XV, 260-272) ; J. H. Robinson, Genesis of Modern Constitutions. TREATISES. James A. Jameson, A Treatise on Constitu- tional Conventions (4th ed., 1887), ch. vi ; T. M. Cooley, Constitutional Limitations, ch. iii; F. Lieber, Miscellaneous Writings, II, 139-161 ; H. C. Black, Constitutional Law 228 GOVERNMENT PAPERS [ (2d ed.), 40-50; J. N. Pomeroy, Constitutional Law, 109- 117; J. K. Tucker, Constitution, I, 63-70. SOURCES. F. B. Hough, American Constitutions (texts and historical sketches to 1871). 100. Paper No. 7. Question of Limiting the Suffrage. BIBLIOGRAPHY. Handbook, 2ld, 54, 132e?, 1425; Brook- ings and Ringwalt, Briefs for Debate, Nos. iii-v ; Municipal Affairs, V, 66. HISTORICAL DISCUSSIONS. E. B. Weeks, History of Negro Suffrage (Political Science Quarterly, IX, 671-703) ; G-. H. Haynes, Educational Qualifications (Political Science Quar- terly, XIII, 495-531); A. P. Wilder, Municipal Problems, 44-56 ; W. E. H. Lecky, Democracy and Liberty, I, 2-38, 70- 100; A. B. Hart, Practical Essays, No. ii ; D. F. Wilcox, Study of City Government, 61-72 ; F. H. Giddings, Democ- racy and Empire, Nos. xv, xvi; S. E. Baldwin, Early Ballot in Connecticut (Amer. Hist. Assoc., Papers, IV, 407-424); H. S. Maine, Popular Government, chs. i, ii ; A. Tocqueville, Democracy in America, I, ch. xiii ; Bryce, Commonwealth, I, chs. Ii, lii, II, pp. 99, 608; C. W. Eliot, American Contributions to Civilization, No. i ; H. A. Chaney, Alien Suffrage (Mich. Pol. Sci. Assoc., Publications, I, No. 2). TREATISES. J. N. Pomeroy, Constitutional Law, 207, 209, 256A; T. M. Cooley, Constitutional Law, ch. xiv, 2; W. O. Bateman, Political and Constitutional Law, 6, 91, 95-100 ; R. Foster, Commentaries, I, 59 ; A. N. Lee, Pop- ular Government and Constitutional Limitations (South Caro- lina Bar Association, Reports, 1890, p. 87) ; J. A. Garfield, Works, I, 85. SOURCES. State legislation, in F. J. Stimson, American Statute Law, and in New York State Library, Bulletin Legis- lation (annual volume). See Handbook, 102. 99-101] NOMINATION MACHINERY 229 101. Paper No. 8. Questions of Popular Nomina- tion Machinery. BIBLIOGRAPHY. Handbook, 2ld, I32d, 142c; Brookings and Ringwalt, Briefs for Debate, No. xi ; Proceedings of Early Party Conventions (American Historical Review, II, 760- 771); F. W. Dallinger, Nominations for Elective Office, 221- 224 ; Municipal Affairs, V, 63-66. HISTORICAL DISCUSSIONS. J. Bryce, Commonwealth, II, chs. Ixix-lxxiii ; C. R. Woodruff, Elective Methods in Philadelphia (Amer. Acad. Pol. Sci., Annals, XVII, 181-204); F. W. Dal- linger, Nominations for Elective Office; Gustavus Myers, His- tory of Tammany Hall ; W. J. Branson, Tendencies in Primary Legislation, Philadelphia Nominating System (Amer. Acad. Pol. Sci., Annals, XIII, 346-363, XIV, 18-37) ; A. C. Bernheim, Party Organization in New York City, allot in New York (Political Science Quarterly, III, 99-122, IV, 130-152) ; F. W. Whitridge, Rotation in Office (Political Science Quarterly, IV, 279-295) ; J. M. Gitterman, Council of Appointment in New York (Political Science Quarterly, VII, 80-115); C. Becker, Unit Rule, Nominations in Colonial New York, Revolutionary Parties in New York (American Historical Review, V, 64-82, VI, 260-275, VII, 56-76) ; J. Bryce, Commonwealth, II, chs. Ixix, Ixx ; J. S. Murdock, First National Nominating Conven- tion (American Historical Review, I, 680-683) ; M. Ostrogorski, Nominating Caucus (American Historical Review, V, 253- 283) ; J. S. Walton. Nominating Conventions in Pennsylvania (American Historical Review, II, 262-278) ; A. Stickney, A True Republic, ch. v ; E. L. Godkin, Nominating System {Atlantic Monthly, LXXIX, 450-467) ; National Conference for Good City Government, Proceedings, 1901, pp. 187-207. SOURCES. Text of State statutes on nomination of can- didates, through F. W. Dallinger, Nominations ; through F. J. Stimson, American Statute Law, through New York State 230 GOVERNMENT PAPERS [ Library, Bulletin Legislation (annual volume) ; through L. B. Evans, Handbooks of American Government. 102. Paper No. 9. How to Secure Good State and Local Legislation. BIBLIOGRAPHY. Handbook, 21e, 43, 44, 132e, 1435; Municipal Affairs, V, 576 ; A. L. Jones, Index to Legal Peri- odical Literature, II, 302-307, 351-355. HISTORICAL DISCUSSIONS. J. Schouler, Constitutional Studies, ch. v ; S. N. Patton, Decay of State and Local Governments (Amer. Acad. Pol. Sci., Annals, I, 26-42); C. B. Elliott, Legislatures and the Courts (Political Science Quarterly, V, 224 258); J. Bryce, Commonwealth, I, chs. xl-xlv, II, ch. Ixxxiii; J. A. Fairlie, State Administration in New York (Political Science Quarterly, XV, 48-74) ; J. A. Fairlie, Municipal Administra- tion, ch. xvii ; D. B. Eaton, Government of Municipalities, ch. x; F. J. Stimson, Uniform State Legislation (Amer. Acad. Pol. Sci., Annals, V, 829-864) ; G. H. Hayues, Representation in New England Legislatures (Amer. Acad. Pol. Sci., Annals, VI r 254-260) ; T. Roosevelt, American Ideals, No. v ; S. Dicksen, Constitutional Restraints (American Law Register, XXXV, 477). TREATISES. H. E. Deming, Legislation in State and City, 1797-1897 (National Conference for Good City Government, Proceedings, 1897, pp. 89-102); J. Ordronaux, Constitutional Legislation, ch. x ; S. Sterne, W. Snyder, J. W. Gary, in American Bar Association, Reports, 1884, pp. 275-301, 1892, pp. 245-311. SOURCES. Political and Municipal Legislation (Amer. Acad. Pol. Sci, Annals, VII, 411-425 (1895), IX, 231-245 (1896), XI, 174-190 (1897), XIII, 212-229 (1898), XV, 160-190 (1899), XVII, 244-259 (1900) ; New York State Library, Bul- letin Legislation (annual volume). The address of the presi- dent of the American Bar Association each year usually 101-104] LOCAL GOVERNMENTS 231 includes a review of the changes in statute law. See especially Moorfield Storey, The American Legislature (Amer. Bar Assoc., Reports, 1894, pp. 245-272). 103. Paper No. 10. Question of Executive Boards. BIBLIOGRAPHY. Handbook, 21e, 2 1/, 143c?, 144^; Muni- cipal Affairs, V, 25. HISTORICAL DISCUSSIONS. J. Bryce, Commonwealth, I, ch. xii ; L. A. Blue, Recent Tendencies in State Administration (Amer. Acad. Pol. Sci , Annals, XVIII, 44-55) ; T. Roosevelt, Ameri- can Ideals, No. viii ; N. Matthews, City Government of Boston ; C. Zueblin, American Municipal Progress ; S. E. Sparling, State Boards of Control (Amer. Acad. Pol. Sci., Annals, XVII, 74-91). TREATISES. F. J. Goodnow, Comparative Administrative Law, I, 102-106; J. A. Fairlie, Municipal Administration, ch. xviii; J. F. Dillon, Municipal Corporations; R. H. Whitten, Public Administration in Massachusetts. SOURCES. Reports of the various executive commissions in the States and cities, especially on water, parks, railroads, public lighting, prisons, asylums, poor, etc. 104. Paper No. n. Improvement of County Gov- ernments. BIBLIOGRAPHY. Handbook, 2 1/, 144e; G. E. Howard, Local Constitutional History, I, 275-498 ; L. A. Jones, Index to Legal Periodical Literature, II, 118, 119. HISTORICAL DISCUSSIONS. J. Bryce, Commonwealth, I, ch. xlix ; monographs on local questions, in Johns Hopkins Uni- versity, Studies, I, Nos. 3-5, 12 (Illinois, Pennsylvania, Michigan, Northwest, South Carolina, Maryland) ; III, Nos. 2, 3, 5-7 (Virginia, Maryland) ; VIII, No. 3 (Wisconsin) ; XI, Nos. 11, 12 (South and Southwest); XII, No. 4 (Vir- ginia) ; A. B. Hart, Practical Essays, No. vii. 232 GOVERNMENT PAPERS [ TREATISES. L. B. Evans (editor), Handbooks of American Government (a series on State history and administration) ; G. E. Howard, Local Constitutional History, ch. x ; F. J. Good- now, Comparative Administrative Law, I, 166-192. SOURCES. Reports of County Commissioners or County Boards. 105. Paper No. 12. Effect of Foreigners on City Governments. BIBLIOGRAPHY. Handbook, 21/, 140^, 142c, 144/; Brook- ings and Ringwalt, Briefs for Debate, Nos. xxvi, xxvii; C. D. Wright, Practical Sociology, 60, 66; D. F. Wilcox, Study of City Government, 245-248 ; E. C. Lunt, Key to United States Census; Municipal Affairs, V, 63-66, 76. HISTORICAL DISCUSSIONS. R. Mayo-Smith, in Amer. Stat. Assoc., Publications, III, 304-320, 429-449 ; R. Mayo-Smith, Assimilation of Nationalities (Political Science Quarterly, IX, 426- 444, 649-670), and Theory of Mixture of Races (Tale Review, III, 166-186); E. T. Devine, Shiftless Population (Amer. Acad. Pol. Sci., Annals, X, 149-164). SOURCES. Municipal Affairs ; J. A. Riis, How the Other Half Lives; J. A. Riis, Making of an American; F. L. Dingley, European Emigration (U. S. Special Consular Reports (1891), IV, 211-332). 106. Paper No. 13. Question of Responsible May- oralty. BIBLIOGRAPHY. Handbook, 21/, 144/; Brookings and Ringwalt, Briefs for Debate, No. xix ; Municipal Affairs, V, 152; National Municipal League, Proceedings, 1901, pp. 232- 234 ; L. A. Jones, Index to Legal Periodical Literature, II, 351-355. 104-107] CITY GOVERNMENTS 233 HISTORICAL DISCUSSIONS. Monographs on city government, in Johns Hopkins University, Studies, III, Nos. 11, 12 (Washington), IV, Nos. 1-4, 10 (New Haven, Philadelphia, Boston, St. Louis), VI, Nos. 2-4 (San Francisco, New Orleans), XIV, No. 2 (Baltimore) ; James T. Young, Liberty vs. Efficiency (Tale Review, VIII, 274-288); E. A. Greenlaw, Office of Mayor (Municipal Affairs, III, 33-60) ; National Conference for Good City Government, Proceedings, 1898, pp. 71-80, 152-219; 1900, pp. 119-128, 136-146; J. Par- ker, Municipal Government in Massachusetts, 16-24 ; C. W. Eliot, American Contributions to Civilization, No. vii; E. D. Durancl, Council versus Mayor (Political Science Quarterly, XV, 426-451, 675-709). TREATISES. D. F. Wilcox, Study of City Government, 98- 115; J. A. Fahiie, Municipal Administration, ch. xix ; W. M. Ivins, Municipal Government (Political Science Quarterly, II, 291-312) ; D. B. Eaton, Government of Municipalities, chs. x, xiv. SOURCES. Reports and inaugural addresses of Mayors ; N. Matthews, Jr., City Government of Boston; J. Quincy, Message of 1899 (as retiring Mayor of Boston) . 107. Paper No. 14. Development of the Cabinet. BIBLIOGRAPHY. Handbook, 219, 132^, 146^; Brookings and Rlngwalt, Briefs for Debate, Nos. xv, xvi ; List of Civil Lists (American Historical Review, II, 758-766). HISTORICAL DISCUSSIONS. J. F. Jameson, Essays in Consti- tutional History, 116-186; B. Harrison, This Country of Ours, chs. vi, xi-xviii; J. Bryce, Commonwealth, I, chs. x, xv, xvi, xxv ; A. L. Lowell, Essays on Government, No. i ; F. Snow, Defence of Congressional Government (Amer. Hist. Assoc., Papers, IV, 109), and Cabinet Government (Amer. Acad. Pol. 234 GOVERNMENT PAPERS [ Sci., Annals, III, 1-13) ; Legal Profession in the Cabinet (Amer- ican Law Review, XXIII, 280) ; De B. R. Keim, Society in Washington. TREATISES. E. C. Mason, Veto Power, 25-28; H. J. Ford, American Politics, 383-396; J. I. C. Hare, American Con- stitutional Law, I, lect. x ; S. E. Baldwin, Absolute Power (Tale Law Journal, VII, 1); J. W. Burgess, Political Science, II, 263, 311-316. SOURCES. Senate Reports, 47 Cong., 2 sess. (1881), No. 837 ; Message and Documents (annual reprint of reports of members of the Cabinet) ; J. A. Garfield, Works, I, 16. 108. Paper No. 15. Needs of Civil Service Reform. BIBLIOGRAPHY. Handbook, 2lg, 40, 49, 132#, 146^; Brookings and Ringwalt, Briefs for Debate, No. xvii ; Municipal Affairs, V, 52, 53 ; L. A. Jones, Index to Legal Periodical Litera- ture, II, 73, 74; W. I. Fletcher, "A. L. A." Index to General Literature (2d ed.), 117 ; U. S. Civil Service Commission, Annual Report, 1898. HISTORICAL DISCUSSIONS. T. Roosevelt, American Ideals, No. vii; T. Roosevelt, Strenuous Life, 41-112, 125-152; F. P. Powers, Reform of the Federal Service (Political Science Quar- terly, III, 247-264); G. E. Howard, Imperialism and the Civil Service (Political Science Quarterly, XIV, 240-250) ; E. C. Mason, Veto Power, 25-29; A. B. Hart, Practical Essays, No. iv ; L. M. Salmon, Appointing Power ; J. M. Merriam, Jeffer- son's Patronage (Amer. Hist. Assoc., Papers, II, 47-52): J. Bryce, Commonwealth, II, ch. Ixv ; G. W. Curtis, Orations and Addresses, II, 477; H. C. Lodge, Historical and Political Essays, 114-137 ; G. McAneny, Civil Service (Municipal Affairs, IV, 708-720). TREATISES. F. J. Goodnow, Comparative Administrative 107-109J CIVIL SERVICE REFORM 235 Law, II, 34-44 ; D. B. Eaton, Government of Municipalities, chs. vii, viii. SOURCES. Good Government (monthly periodical) ; National Civil Service Reform League, Proceedings ; United States Civil Service Commission, Annual Report ; Massachusetts Civil Service Commission, Annual Report ; New York Civil Service Commis- sion, Annual Report ; C. R. Fish, Removals (tabulation in Amer. Hist. Assoc., Annual Report for 1899, I, 67-86) ; T. Roosevelt, Civil Service Reform (Atlantic Monthly, LXVII, 252-257, LXXV, 239-246); Contemporaries, III, 158, IV, 197, 199, 202; G. Hunt, Office Seeking under Washington, John Adams, and Jefferson (American Historical Review, I, 270-283, II, 241-261, III, 270-291). 109. Paper No. 16. Choice of Senators by Popular Vote. BIBLIOGRAPHY. Handbook, 21A, 316, 132/, 145; Brook- ings and Ringwalt, Briefs for Debate, No. xiii ; C. H. Kerr, United States Senate, 181-184. HISTORICAL DISCUSSIONS. C. H. Kerr, United States Sen- ate, 15-37 ; J. Haynes, Popular Election (Johns Hopkins Uni- versity, Studies, XI, 547) ; J. Bryce, Commonwealth, I, ch. xii ; E. Moffett, Is the Senate Unfairly Constituted ? (Political Science Quarterly, X, 248); W. P. Garrison, Reform of the Senate (Atlantic Monthly, LXVIII, 227); J. H. Flagg, Choice of Senators (New England Magazine, XIV, 190) ; Walter Clark. Election by Popular Vote (Arena, X, 453-461). TREATISES. R. Foster, Commentaries, 77-80; J. N. Pomeroy, Constitutional Law, 133-139; J. Story, Commen- taries, 703-705; Federalist, No. 62; J. W. Burgess, Politi- cal Science, II, 41-51, 106-130. SOURCES. Contested Election Cases (Senate) ; G. F. Edmunds, J. H. Mitchell, G. F. Hoar, articles from personal experience 236 GOVERNMENT PAPERS [ (Forum, XVIII, 270, XXI, 355, XXIII, 129-271); W. S. Appleton, A Century of the Senate (Mass. Hist. Soc., Pro- ceedings, 2d Series, X, 9). no. Paper No. 17. Defects of the Committee System. BIBLIOGRAPHY. Handbook, 2lh, 132/, 145c ; Brookings and Ring wait, Briefs for Debate, No. xv ; M. P. Follett, The Speaker, 331-334; L. G. McCouachie, Congressional Commit- tees, 420-425 ; list of aids to government documents, in A. B. Hart, Foundations of American Foreign Policy, 273. HISTORICAL DISCUSSIONS. M. P. Follett, The Speaker, 130-144; L. G. McConachie, Congressional Committees; W. Wilson, Congressional Government; F. Snow, Defence of Con- gressional Government (Amer. Hist. Assoc., Papers, IV, 309- 330) ; J. Bryce, Commonwealth, I, chs. xiv, xv ; H. Von Hoist, Constitutional Law, 32, 37. SOURCES. Congressional Record (any typical day's session, which shows committee business) ; J. G. Ames, Comprehensive Indexes to Publications of the Government ; T. H. McKee, Re- ports of the Select and Special Committees (list of reports) ; House Reports and Senate Reports, for text of committee reports ; hearings before committees are occasionally published, though not in any regular series. in. Paper No. 18. Influences on the Legislation of Congress. BIBLIOGRAPHY. Handbook, 2U, 37, 132/, 145rf, 145e ; M. P. Follett, The Speaker, ch. xi; L. A. Jones, Index to Legal Peri- odical Literature, II, 85, 86 ; W. I. Fletcher, "A. L. A" Index to General Literature (2d ed.), 131. 109-112] NATIONAL LEGISLATIVE 237 HISTORICAL DISCUSSIONS. M. P. Follett, The Speaker, chs. iv-vi; J. Bryce, Commonwealth, I, chs. xix-xxi; H. Von Hoist, Constitutional Law, 33, 34 ; F. A. Cleveland, Growth of Democracy, ch. xiii; A. B. Hart, Practical Essays, Nos. i, ix; E. C. Mason, Congressional Demands for Information (Amer. Hist. Assoc., Papers, V, 367-378); E. C. Mason, Veto Power, ch. iv ; W. Wilson, Congressional Government ; J. Parton, Topics of the Time; Amer. Bar Assoc., Reports, 1887, pp. 396-405; E. P. Lee, Congress at Work (Albany Law Journal, XL VIII, 386) ; E. F. Crump, How Congress Votes Money (North Ameri- can Review, CLXII, 14). SOURCES. B. Harrison, This Country of Ours ; J. H. McKee, Red Book (Congressional forms) ; Congressional Record (a typical day during the session of Congress) ; H. C. Lodge, Historical and Political Essays, 169-197 ; J. A. Garfield, A Cen- tury of Congress ( Works, VI, 463). 112. Paper No. 19. Administrative Decisions. BIBLIOGRAPHY. Handbook, 21/, 31c, 113, 132A, 147; Century Digest (s. v. certiorari, injunctions, mandamus, scire facias, etc.) ; W. M. Rose, Notes on the United States Reports (see the Index, s. v. certiorari, injunctions, mandamus, scire facias, etc.). HISTORICAL DISCUSSIONS. E. D. Remick, Corporations and the Courts (Political Science Quarterly, V, 214-223) ; D. F. Wilcox, Study of City Government, ch. iii ; J. R. Commons, State Supervision for Cities (Amer. Acad. Pol. Sci., Annals* V, 861-881); G. N. Lieber, Executive Regulations (American Law Review, XXXI, 876) ; W. H. Rand, Judicial Legislation (Har- vard Law Review, VIII, 328). TREATISES. J. F. Dillon, Municipal Corporations (4th ed.), II, chs. xx-xxiii ; F. J. Goodnow, Politics and Administra- 238 GOVERNMENT PAPERS [ tion, chs. iv, v; F. J. Goodnow, Comparative Administrative Law, I, 31-45, II, 144-216; F. J. Goodnow, Executive and Courts, Writ of Certiorari, Mandamus Cases (Political Science Quarterly, I, 533-559, VI, 493-536, VIII, 48-57); T. E. Hol- land, Jurisprudence, 325-328. SOURCES. Court decisions in administrative cases through F. J. Goodnow a few of them in J. B. Thayer, Cases, E. McClain, Cases, C. E. Boyd, Cases (passim) ; decisions of the special administrative courts, as land office, patent office, etc. (see Handbook, 31c). 113. Paper No. 20. Principle of Declaring Acts Void. BIBLIOGRAPHY. Handbook, 21, 31c, 112, 132A, 147d; foot- notes to historical discussions and treatises; C. A. Bennesou, Power of United States Courts over United States Statutes. HISTORICAL DISCUSSIONS. J. B. Thayer, Origin and Scope of the American Doctrine of Constitutional Law, 4-12, and John Marshall, 61-78, 95-101, 104-110; J. B. Thayer, Cases, I, 10- 47, 146-154; B. Coxe, Judicial Power and Unconstitutional Legis- lation ; C. A. Benneson, Power of United States Courts over Acts of Congress ; W. H. Meigs, Relation of the Judiciary to the Constitution (American Law Review, XIX, 175-203); T. M. Cooley and others, Constitutional History in the Development of American Law, 9-14, 37-43, 76-80, 179-188, 221-223, 226- 233 ; W. W. Willoughby, The Supreme Court, chs. v, vi; H. L. Carson, Supreme Court, 203-206, 366, 378 ; C. B. Elliott, Legis- latures and Courts (Political Science Quarterly, V, 224-258) ; J. C. Bancroft Davis, in 131 U. S. Reports, App. ccxxxv; T. M. Good, An Athenian Parallel (Yale Review, II, 64-73); E. C. McMurtrie, Jurisdiction to Declare Acts Void (American Law Register, XXXII, 1093); J. Bryce, Commonwealth, I, ch. xxxiii. 112,113] DECLARING ACTS VOID 239 TREATISES. J. Kent, Commentaries, I, lect. xii, 449-454 ; J. Story, Constitution (Cooley ed.), 373-397; T. M. Cooley, Constitutional Limitations, ch. vii ; T. Thacher, Limits of Con- stitutional Law (Yale Review, VI, 7-16); H. Von Hoist, Con- stitutional Law, 18, 19, 61; F. G. Goodnow, Comparative Administrative Law, II, 200-216 ; J. W. Burgess, Political Science, II, 325-329; S. F. Miller, Constitution, 98-111, 135-141; H. C. Black, Handbook of Constitutional Law (2d ed.), 31; J. I. C. Hare, Constitutional Law, lects. viii, xxii ; Dana's Wheaton, note 31 ; J. N. Pomeroy, Constitutional Law, 134-148; R. C. Davis, Judicial Decisions on Statutes Prohib- iting Combinations and Trusts ( Quarterly Journal of Economics, XIV, 416) ; C. G. Tiedeman, Income Tax Decisions (Amer. Acad. Pol. Sci., Annals, VI, 268-279) ; E. J. James, Legal Tender Decisions (Amer. Econ. Assoc., Publications, IV, No. 5). SOURCES. A. Hamilton in Federalist, Nos. 78, 80, 81; pas- sages quoted in Thayer, Cases, I, 83-94 ; J. Elliot, Debates (2d ed.), II, 196, 197, 489, III, 205, 324, 325, 553, IV, 155, V, 151, 321, 344, 346, 347, 429; J. B. Thayer, Cases, I, 34- 154 (includes State cases and valuable notes). COLONIAL AND PRECONSTITUTIONAL CASES. Frost v. Leigh- ton (Mass., 1739) : American Historical Review, II, 229-240. Paxton's Case (Mass., 1761) : Thayer, Cases, I, 48-55. Josiah Phillips (Va., 1778) : American Historical Review, I, 444-484. Holmes v. Walton (N. J., 1780) : American Historical Review, IV, 456-469. Trevettv. Weeden (R. I., 1786) : Thayer, Cases, I, 73-78. Bayard v. Singleton (N. C., 1789): Thayer, Cases, 1, 78-83. EARLY FEDERAL CASES. 1789-1803. Letter to the Presi- dent (1790) : 4 American Jurist, 293 ; J. Story, Commentaries, 1579rc. Hayburn's Case (1792): 2 Dallas, 409. U. S. r. Yale Todd (1794) : 13 Howard, 53 (note to U. S. v. Fer- 240 GOVERNMENT PAPERS [ reira) ; Thayer, Cases, I, I05n. Marbury v. Madison (1803) : 1 Cranch, 137; Thayer, Cases, I, 107-114; Boyd, Cases, 17; McClain, Cases, 815 (reviewed by S. Pennoyer in American Law Review, XXX, 183). ANTE-BELLUM CASES. U. S. v. Ferreira (1851-52): 13 Howard, 40; Thayer, Gases, I, 160, 161; Boyd, Cases, 471. Dred Scott v. Sandford (1857): 19 Howard, 393; Thayer, Cases, I, 480-496. CASES ON THE CIVIL WAR AND ITS RESULTS. Gordon v. U. S. (1865): 2 Wallace, 561; also 117 U. S., 695, App. ; 119 U. S.,477 (U. S.v.Jones); and 148 U. S., 222 (In re Sanborn). Ex parte Garland (1867) : 4 Wallace, 333; Thayer, Cases, II, 1453; McClain, Cases, 576; Boyd, Cases, 324.- Hepburn v. Griswold (1870) : 8 Wallace, 603 ; Thayer, Cases, II, 1222; Boyd, Cases, 118. U. S. v. DeWitt (1870): 9 Wallace, 41 ; Thayer, Cases, I, 735-737. Justices v. Murray (1870): 9 Wallace, 274. Collector v. Day (1871): 11 Wal- lace, 113; Thayer, Cases, II, 1378; Boyd, Cases, 64; McClain, Cases, 153. U. S. v. Klein (1872): 13 Wallace, 128. Civil Rights Cases (1883-84): 109 U. S., 3; Thayer, Cases, I, 554 ; Boyd, Cases, 518 ; McClain, Cases, 37. REVERSAL OF HEPBURN v. GRISWOLD. Knox v. Lee (1871) : 12 Wallace, 457 ; Boyd, Cases, 136. Parker v. Davis (1870) : 13 Wallace, 604. Railroad v. Johnson (1872) : 15 Wallace, 195. Railroad Co. v. Maryland (1874) : 22 Wallace, 105 ; Thayer, Cases, II, 1953-1957. Juillard v. Greenman (1884) : 110 U. S., 421; Thayer, Cases, II, 2225; Boyd, Cases, 157; McClain, Cases, 442. GENERAL CASES SINCE RECONSTRUCTION. U. S. v. Railroad Co. (1873): 17 Wallace, 322; McClain, Oases, 158. U. S. v. Reese (1875) : 92 U. S., 214. U. S. v. Fox (1877): 95 U. S., 670. Trade Mark Cases (1879): 100 U. S., 82; Thayer, Cases, II, 1993-1997. Kilbourn v. Thompson (1880) : 113-116] TERRITORY AND TAXES 241 103 U. S., 168; McClain, Cases, 553. U. S. v. Harris (1882): 106 U. S., 629. Boyd v. U. S. (1886): 116 U. S., 616; McClain, Cases, 885. Baldwin v. Franks (1887): 120 U. S., 678. Callan v. Wilson (1888) : 127 U. S., 540 ; Thayer, Cases, I, 358-361. Counselman v. Hitchcock (Interstate Com- merce) (1892) : 142 U. S., 547. Income Tax Cases (1895): 158 U. S., 601. 114. Paper No. 21. Status of Territory Conquered but not yet Ceded. BIBLIOGRAPHY. Handbook, 17, 20e?, 21/, 42 (with cases), 54, 69, 82, 132t, 147A ; G. C. Lewis, Government of Dependen- cies, 165-167. 115. Paper No. 22. Status of Territory Ceded but not yet Organized. BIBLIOGRAPHY. Handbook, 42 (with cases), 75, 132e, 147A ; Gr. C. Lewis, Government of Dependencies, chs. iv, v, x, xi. 116. Paper No. 23. Difficulties in Assessing Per- sonal Taxes. BIBLIOGRAPHY. Handbook, 21k, 39, 132;', 1495; Brook- ings and Ringwalt, Briefs for Debate, Nos. xlv, xlvi ; Municipal Affairs, V, 73, 74; L. A. Jones, Index to Legal Periodical Literature, II, 483-487; W. I. Fletcher, " A. L. A." Index to General Literature (2d ed.), 570. HISTORICAL DISCUSSIONS. R. T. Ely, Taxation in American States and Cities, 131-234 ; L. Purdy, Taxation of Personalty (Municipal Affairs, III, 299-349) ; Single Tax Discussion (Jour- nal of Social Science, XXVII, 1-124) ; E. A. Angell, Tax Inquisi- tion System in Ohio (Yale Review, V, 350-373) ; R. H. Whitten, 16 242 GOVERNMENT PAPERS [ Assessment in Chicago (Journal Political Economics, V, 174); C. C. Plehn, General Property Tax in California; T. N. Carver, Ohio State Inquisitor Tax Law ; F. R. Clow, Comparative Study of the Administration of City Finances (Amer. Econ. Assoc., Eco- nomic Studies, I, No. 3, II, No. 3, 3d ser. II, No. 4) ; N. Matthews, Double Taxation (Quarterly Journal of Economics, IV, 339); J. W. Chapman, State Tax Commissions (Johns Hopkins Uni- versity, Studies, XV, Nos. 10, 11) ; E. R. A. Seligman, Essays in Taxation, Property Tax, Corporations, Progressive Taxation, Income Tax, State Income Taxes, Tax Reform (Political Science Quarterly, V, 24-64, 438-467, 636-676, VIII, 230-251, IX, 610-648, X, 221-247, XV, 629-646) ; E. R. A. Seligman, Franchise Tax Law in New York ( Quarterly Journal of Economics, XIII, 445-452) ; Max West, Theory of Inheritance Tax, City and Country Taxes (Political Science Quarterly, VIII, 426^44, XIV, 305-324, 470-499); E. R. A. Seligman, Shifting and Incidence of Taxation, Progressive Taxation in Theory and Practice (Amer. Econ. Assoc., Publications, VII, Nos. 2, 3, IX, Nos. 1, 2); J. C. Schwab, History of the New York Property Tax (Amer. Econ. Assoc., Publications, V, No. 4). TREATISES. J. F. Dillon, Muncipial Corporations, II, ch. xix ; T. M. Cooley, Law of Taxation, ch. xii ; H. Von Hoist, Constitutional Law, 96; Henry George, Progress and Poverty, book viii, chs. iii, iv ; V. Rosewater, Special Assessments (Colum- bia University, Studies, II, 359); T. M. Cooley, Constitutional Limitations, ch. xiv. SOURCES. Statistics in Tribune Almanac and World Almanac (annuals) ; reports of State Treasurers and Auditors. 117. Paper No. 24. Difficulties of Tariff Adminis- tration. BIBLIOGRAPHY. Handbook, 2U, 132;', 149c; Brookings and Ringwalt, Briefs for Debate, Nos. xxxvii, xxxviii, xlii ; 116-118] TARIFFS AND TRACTION 243 Bogart and Rawles, Trial Bibliography of Financial History, ch. x, No. 5 ; L. A. Jones, Index to Legal Periodical Literature, II, 482, 483. HISTORICAL DISCUSSIONS. J. D. Goss, Tariff Administra- tion; F. W. Taussig, Tariff History ; F. J. Goodnow, Collection of Duties (Political Science Quarterly, I, 36-44) ; E. J. Shriver, How Customs Duties Work (Political Science Quarterly, II, 265- 273); S. B. Harding, Minimum Principle (Amer. Acad. Pol. Sci., Annals, VI, 100-116); O. H. Perry, Proposed Tariff Legis- lation since 1883 (Quarterly Journal Economics, II, 691); J. B. Reed, Tariff and Business (North American Review, CLVIII, 110) ; E. L. Godkin, Political and Social Aspects (New Puritan Review, III, 164) ; Nation, N. Y., passim ; O. L. Elliott, Tariff Controversy ; W. Hill, First Stages of the Tariff Policy (Amer. Econ. Assoc., Publications, VIII, No. 5). SOURCES. Edward Young, Special Report on the Customs Tariff Legislation oj the U. S. (House Exec. Docs., 42 Cong., 2 sess. (1872), No. 109); H. Talbott (compiler), Tariff Hearings before Committee on Ways and Means (1893) ; D. Manning, Re- ports of Secretary of the Treasury (1885, 1886) ; Secretary of Treasury, Annual Report; Commissioner of Customs, Annual Report. 118. Paper No. 25. City Ownership of Traction Lines. BIBLIOGRAPHY. Handbook, 21;, 211, 132&, 150; Brook- ings and Ringwalt, Briefs for Debate, No. 1; L. A. Jones, Index to Legal Periodical Literature, II, 354, 473 ; W. Z. Ripley, Transportation. HISTORICAL DISCUSSIONS. A. H. Sinclair, Toronto Street Rail- way (Quarterly Journal of Economics, VI, 98-105); J. H. Gray, Street Railway Situation in Chicago ( Quarterly Journal of Econom- ics , XII, 83-90) ; C. Moore, Municipal Ownership in Detroit 244 GOVERNMENT PAPERS [ (Quarterly Journal of Economics, XIII, 453, XIV, 121); W. Smart, Glasgow and Municipal Industries (Quarterly Journal of Economics, IX, 188-194) ; Albert Shaw, Municipal Government in Great Britain, 127-133, 156-158, 190-193; Albert Shaw, Munici- pal Government in Continental Europe, 79-90, 188, 189, 262, 263, 325-327, 350-355, 427-429, 459, 460; C. D. Wright, Practical Sociology, 79 ; National Conference for Good City Govern- ment, Proceedings, 1896, pp. 198-225, 1898, pp. 94-100, 220- 250, 1899, pp. 162-168, 207-215, 1900, pp. 157-198; Ameri- can Academy of Political and Social Science, Corporations and Public Welfare, 63-76; Municipal Affairs, I, 421-457, 605-630, III, 234-263, 473-491, IV, 31-59, 106-181, 212-221, 458-480, V, 419-584; W. R. Hopkins, Street Railway Problem in Cleveland (Amer. Econ. Assoc., Economic Studies, I, Nos. 5, 6); M. R. Maltbie, Street Railways of Chicago. TREATISES. E. W. Bemis, Municipal Monopolies, ch. vii ; J. A. Fairlie, Municipal Administration, ch. xii ; A. H. Sin- clair, Municipal Monopolies; C. W. Baker, Monopolies and the People ; H. C. Adams and others, Modern Municipalities and Quasi-Public Works (Amer. Econ. Assoc., Publications, II, No. 6). SOURCES. Massachusetts Special Commission on Rela- tions with Street Railway Companies, Report, 1898 ; H. V. and H. W. Poor, Poor's Manual of the Railroads of the U. S. (annual volume) ; reports on street railway companies, in Massachusetts Board of Railway Commissioners, Report (an- nual volume). 119. Paper No. 26. Limitation of Immigration. BIBLIOGRAPHY. Handbook, 21b, 211, 40, 44, 74, 80, 132&, 150e?; Brookings and Ringwalt, Briefs for Debate, Nos. xxvi- xxviii ; C. D. Wright, Practical Sociology, 23, 60 ; E. C. Lunt, Key to U. S. Census, 36, 39 ; L. A. Jones, Index to Legal Peri- 118-120] IMMIGRATION AND CONSULS 245 odical Literature, II, 226 ; W. I. Fletcher, "A. L. A" Index to General Literature (2d ed.), 289, 290. HISTORICAL DISCUSSIONS. F. A. Walker, Discussions in Economics and Statistics, II, 417-454; J. A. Riis, How the Other Half Lives ; J. H. Noble, Immigration Question (Political Science Quarterly, VII, 232-243) ; E. Schuyler, Italian Immigra- tion into U. S. (Political Science Quarterly, IV, 480-489) ; J. H. Senner, Immigration Question (Amer. Acad. Pol. Sci v Annals, X, 1-19) ; F. P. Powers, Occupations of Immigrants (Quarterly Journal of Economics, II, 223-228) ; H. H. Hart, Immigration and Crime (American Journal of Sociology, II, 369) ; J. H. Seoner, How we restrict Immigration (North American Review, CLVIII, 494-499). TREATISES. J. W. Burgess, Political Science, I, 43; R. Mayo Smith, Emigration and Immigration, chs. xi-xiii ; see Handbook, 80. SOURCES. Immigration Restriction League, Reports, etc. ; U. S. Commissioner of Immigration, Annual Report; H. C. Lodge, J. B. Webber, C. S. Smith, W. E. Chandler, H. C. Hansbrough, J. H. Senner, S. G. Croswell, O. F. Hall, in North American Review, CLII, 27, CLIV, 424, CLVI, 1, 220, CLVIII, 494, CLXII, 649, CLXIV, 526, CLXV, 393 ; H. H. Boyeseu, G. H. S. Schwab, S. G. Fisher, in Forum, III, 533, XIV, 805, XVI, 560. 120. Paper No. 27. Status of Consuls. BIBLIOGRAPHY. Handbook, 21m, 132w, 1516; footnote to treatises on International Law ; L. A. Jones, Index to Legal Periodical Literature, II, 93. HISTORICAL DISCUSSIONS. E. Schuyler, American Diplomacy and Furtherance of Commerce; P. Belmont, W. Slade, W. W. Rockhill, in Forum, IV, 519, XV, 163, XXII, 673: C. D. Warner, H. White, W. F. Wharton, in North American Re- 246 GOVERNMENT PAPERS [ view, CLVIII, 412, CLIX, 711, CLXII, 274; A. H. Wash- burn, Some Evils of our Consular Service (Atlantic Monthly, LXXIV, 241-252) ; J. A. Garfield, Works, II, 274. TREATISES. W. E. Hall, International Law (4th ed.), 330- 338; J. N. Pomeroy, International Law, 443-454; T. D. Woolsey, International Law (6th ed.), 99, 100; R. Phillr more, International Law (3d ed.), II, 287-325; Lawrence's Wheaton, 217-229, 423, 426-437. SOURCES. U. S. Secretary of State, Annual Report; Con- sular Reports ; B. H. Ridgely, Comedies of a Consulate (Scrib- ner's Magazine, XIX, 625-637). 121. Paper No. 28. The Pension System. BIBLIOGRAPHY. Handbook, 21m, 132/, 152/; Brookings and Ringwalt, Briefs for Debate, No. xxix. HISTORICAL DISCUSSIONS. W. P. Hovey, Soldier's Rights ; E. H. Hall, Indignity to Our Citizen Soldiers ; W. H. Glasson,. History of Military Pension Legislation (Columbia University, Studies, XII, No. 3) ; E. C. Mason, Veto Power, 71-81. SOURCES. Secretary of Interior, and Pension Commissioner, Annual Reports; veto messages in J. D. Richardson, Messages- (especially in 1885-1889, 1893-1897). 122. Paper No. 29. Best Regulation of the Liquor Traffic. BIBLIOGRAPHY. Handbook, 21w, 132ra, 153c; Brookings and Ringwalt, Brief s for Debate, Nos. Ixvi, Ixvii ; C. D. Wright, Practical Sociology, 203; Municipal Affairs, V, 125, 126; L. A. Jones, Index to Legal Periodical Literature, II, 249, 250, 314, 315 ; J. Koren, Economic Aspects of the Liquor Problem. HISTORICAL DISCUSSIONS. W. E. H. Lecky, Democracy and Liberty, II, 134-167 ; J. H. Crooker, Problems in American Society, No. iii ; T. N. Wilson, Local Option in Norway ; S. N. 120-123] LIQUOR TRAFFIC AND RIOTERS 247 Patten, Economic Basis of Prohibition (Amer. Acad. Pol. Sci., Annals, II, 59-68) ; J. G. Brooks, Gothenburg Plan (Forum, XIV, 514) ; C. W. Eliot, Study of American Liquor Laws (Atlan- tic Monthly, LXXIX, 177) ; B. R. Tillman, Liquor Laws in South Carolina (North American Review, CLVIII, 140) ; C. L. M. Sites, Centralized Administration of Liquor Laws (Columbia Uni- versity, Studies, X, No. 3). SOURCES. F. H. Wines and J. Koren, Liquor Problem in its Legislative Aspects (Committee of Fifty, Report, No. 1); U..S. Commissioner of Labor, Fifth Special Report, 1893 (Gothenburg system) Twelfth Annual Report (economic aspects), 1898 ; E. L. Fanshawe, Liquor Legislation ; J. Koren, Economic Aspects of the Liquor Problem ; R. Calkins, Substitutes for the Saloon. 123. Paper No. 30. Injunctions against Rioters. BIBLIOGRAPHY. Handbook, 21w, 31c, 1320, 153/; Brook- ings and Ring wait, Briefs for Debate, No. Ixxv ; C. D. Wright, Practical Sociology, 150, 213; Century Digest, article on Injunction ; L. A. Jones, Index to Legal Periodical Literature, II, 232, 233. HISTORICAL DISCUSSIONS. T. M. Cooley, Lessons of Recent Civil Disorders (Forum, XVIII, 1-19); H. J. Fletcher, The Rail- way War (Atlantic Monthly, LXXIV, 534-541) ; C. N. Gregory, Government by Injunction (Harvard Law Review, XI, 487) ; W. D. Lewis, The Debs Case (American Law Register, New Series, XXXIII, 879). TREATISES. W. H. Dunbar, Government by Injunction (Amer. Econ. Assoc,, Studies, III, No. 1) ; H. Von Hoist, Constitutional Law, 11 ; F. J. Stimson, Modern Use of Injunction (Political Science Quarterly, X, 189-202) ; W. M. Bateman, Injunctions against Labor Unions (Central Law Journal, XXXIX, 265); C. C. Allen, Injunctions against Organized Labor (American Law 248 GOVERNMENT PAPERS [ 123 Review, XXVIII, 828) ; discussion in American Bar Associa- tion, Report, 1894, pp. 151-326. SOURCES. Industrial Commission, Report, IV, Testimony, 7-14, 145-147 ; U. S. Strike Commission, Report on the Chicago Strike; cases, in Central Law Journal, XLII, 74; Law Reports Annotated, XXVIII, 464 ; American Law Review, XXVIII, 269, XXXI, 761, XXXIII, 879 (Debs). PAKT VI SPECIAL REPORTS 124. Purpose of the Exercise. In courses in which there is a great demand upon the libra- ries, it is not feasible to require all students to delve for them- selves in a large collection of primary books, as a preparation for the lectures. This necessary part of the historical training is therefore to be sought in the special reports. In preparing them, students are expected to find out for themselves things not stated in any of the general authorities. The system will introduce them to the most serviceable authors ; it will make them familiar with the sources of information on American history ; it is intended to develop their powers of analysis and statement, and to interest them in the unsettled questions of our history. To each student, from time to time, will therefore be assigned a very limited special topic, on which he is expected to make a condensed report, based upon original authorities, and supported also by use of the best secondary discussions. The result ordinarily need not be stated in literary form, but may be more like a brief ; in all cases, however, students must give exact reference to the authorities used on all significant points. The work of preparation is to be done under the personal direction, and to the satisfaction, of an assistant specially assigned for the purpose, acting under the instructor's guidance. 250 SPECIAL REPORTS [ In the special directions below will be found suggestions for reports on the following subjects: bibliography ( 129, 130), constitutional questions ( 131, 132), slavery questions ( 133, 134), pre-constitutional diplomacy ( 136), Federal diplomacy ( 137), and on various topics in government ( 139-153). In assigning reports particular pains will be taken to see that no two students in a course have the same subjects ; and so far as possible topics will be chosen which have not been worked out in published books or articles. There are many interesting points in American history and government which have never been examined by any scholar, and there is, therefore, an opportunity for some distinctly original work. In assigning reports, as much attention as possible will be paid to the preference of the student, as indicated in his appli- cation on entering the course. But if any student finds in the lists printed below, or elsewhere, a particular subject which he wishes to have assigned to him, he may hand in a written re- quest to that effect. It is impossible to assign subjects all of which will prove Of equal difficulty and importance, and some- times the question set may prove barren ; in such cases a reas- signment will be made. 125. Constitutional and Political Reports, in His- tory 13. In the course in United States history (HISTORY 13) three reports will be required from each student, two in the first half- year and one in the second half-year. The topics will be given out at least a month before reports are due. It is expected that students will put upon the special report work from one-third to one-quarter of the whole time spent upon the course; and no student will receive a pass mark in the course who has not gained at least a passing grade on this part of the work. 124-126] CONSTITUTIONAL AND POLITICAL 251 The work of preparing the reports must invariably be done in consultation with the assistant on reports, and no reports will be received without evidence that at least three conferences have been held with the assistant. Unless a previous arrangement has been made with the instructor or assistant, no overdue reports will be received, except with the Recorder's stamp, showing that the delay is excused at the college office. The subjects will be as follows : Kept. No. 1. Due November 15. The bibliography of a pub- lic man (Handbook, 129-1305). November 1. Last day for first conference. November 8. Last day for second conference. November 15. Last day for receiving completed reports. Kept. No. 2. Due January 15. A constitutional inquiry (Handbook, 131, 1325). January 3. Last day for first conference. January 8. Last day for second conference. January 15. Last day for receiving completed reports. Kept. No. 3. Due April 15. A discussion of slavery (Hand- book, 133, 134). April 1. Last day for first conference. April 8. Last day for second conference. April 15. Last day for receiving completed re- ports. 126. Diplomatic Reports, in History 14. The materials in diplomacy are not so abundant nor so sys- tematized as in history or government, and the course presup- poses that the students have had training in the use of books 252 SPECIAL REPORTS [ and the preparation of written work. Only two reports will therefore be required, one in each half-year. The subjects are broader and more various than in HISTORY 13, and more nearly approach the thesis in character. The instructor will be glad to help students, in his conference hours, on this side of their work. The topics will be as follows : 1. Dae February 15. Some phase of pre-constitutional di- plomacy (Handbook, 136). 2. Due June 15. Some phase of diplomacy in the Federal period (Handbook, 137). 127. Government Reports, in Government 12. In the course on government (GOVERNMENT 12), the special reports constitute a considerable part of the year's work ; they are designed to open up various ranges of materials and doc- trine, and hence eight special reports will be called for, four in each half-year. As the students are advanced and the topics numerous and very directly related to the subject matter of the course, it is expected that great attention will be paid to the special reports ; but students are warned against trying to write elaborate and exhaustive theses upon these subjects. The topics will be as follows : 1. Due November 15. Some phase of American political methods (Handbook, 139-142). 2. Due December 15. The actual workings of some part of the State government (Handbook, 143). 3. Due January 15. The actual workings of some part of the local government (Handbook, 144). 4. Due February 15. The actual workings of some part of the national government (Handbook, 145-147). 5. Due March 15. The actual workings of some territorial function (Handbook, 148). 126-128] DIPLOMACY AND GOVERNMENT 253 6. Due April 15. The actual workings of some financial function (Handbook, 149). 7. Due May 15. Some phase of the workings of the com- mercial system (Handbook, 150). 8. Due June 15. Some phase of the workings of the war power, foreign power, or police powers (Handbook, 151-153). 128. General Directions for Special Reports in His- tory 13. For the convenience of the instructor in handling the reports, and for the training of students in methodical habits of work, and in order to accustom them to arrange their material for others' use, the following general directions will be found im- portant. Students will be held responsible for following them out carefully. Particular directions and suggestions for each report will be found below : ASSIGNMENT. So far as possible, the preference of the student for a particular line of investigation will be consulted ; for this purpose students are required when they enter any of the courses to fill out a blank form with an account of their previ- ous study and a list of preferred topics. Any student may take up a new subject, by the consent of the assistant, record to be made of every such change. AUTHORITIES. Abundant information as to bibliographies and other aids may be found in other parts of the Handbook ; and in Channing and Hart, Guide. Students will also be held responsible for such information as may be had from the fol- lowing collections : (a) The card catalogue in the Delivery Room of the Harvard College Library. (b) The bibliographies, encyclopaedias, dictionaries, and other aids in the Reading Room of the Library. 254 SPECIAL REPORTS [ (c) The reserved books in Colonial and United States history, or international law and diplomatic history, or government, all in the Reading Room. The usual arrangement of the books is alphabetically by authors. (d) Congressional documents and other official material in the Reading Room. (e) Such special authorities as may be found to be of special service, especially sources. Note that the Evans Reference Library in United States his- tory in Harvard 2 contains many of the standard reading books. ASSISTANCE. It is a principle of the whole work that the actual search for the books must be done by students them- selves. No other assistance or guidance will be expected in this exercise except from the instructor and regularly appointed assistant. Whenever, after a faithful attempt, students are not able to bring to light sufficient information on their subject, or meet contradictions or difficulties which they do not know how to explain, they are expected to apply to the assistant. The library officials should not be asked to furnish material, or to show students how to use catalogues and other aids ; the assistant will cheerfully give such aid to those who need it. It is not desired that a student should be discouraged at the outset for want of guidance ; nor that he should avoid the lesson which the exercise is meant to teach the independent use of books and aids. CONFERENCE. All students are required to report to the as- sistant at least three times. (1) When they begin work upon their topic, so as to be sure that they understand what is expected of them. (2) At least once during the progress of their work, so that the assistant may know that they are on a right road. (3) In order to submit their notes or completed report for the assistant's approval before handing in the report. 128] GENERAL DIRECTIONS 255 These requirements are absolute ; no report will be credited to a student unless it bear the assistant's minute of three conferences. METHODS. As one of the principal objects of the special report work is to train students in acquiring information on any subject, with the greatest economy of time and the great- est clearness of result, every student is urged to think out a method for himself. A very convenient way is to take notes on loose sheets, each piece of paper being devoted to some branch of the general subject; the information gained from different books is thus assembled in a classified form, and when the sheets are arranged, the material for the condensed report is brought together in logical order. In all cases, exact refer- ences to volume and page must support all important state- ments ; in giving authorities the author's name should precede the title of the book. No reports will be accepted in which references are lacking or indefinite. Except in the biblio- graphical report ( 129) every reference must be to a book or passage which the student has seen himself ; and if there are serious discrepancies between authorities, they should be pointed out. The effort will be made to assign only topics on which there is positive information ; but if a diligent search in the proper books brings little to light, the work will be as read- ily accepted as though more had been found. FORM OF THE REPORT. All the reports are to be handed in on the uniform sheets with printed headings, on which topics are handed out. Do not fold the papers. The amount of time spent should be noted. Dates should be entered in the narrow outside column ; subject matter only in the broad middle column ; references in the inner column, next to the folding in the sheet. On the back of the page the text should still come into the middle column. Additional sheets should be of the same size and ruling, and should be attached by mucilage or 256 BIBLIOGRAPHICAL REPORTS [ sewing, not by fasteners or pins. Since one of the objects of the exercise is to teach conciseness, the length of the report should be kept within limits. ARRANGEMENT. The matter should be logically arranged, point by point, the heads indicated by catch-words in the date column, or by underlining. Students are warned against try- ing to write theses instead of brief reports. Special notice will be taken of neatness of arrangement, precision of the references, and uniformity of abbreviations and classification in different parts of the same piece. Wherever the sub- ject admits of such a method, students should analyze and classify their results, so as to show the subordination of the topic and the progress of the thought. On application to the assistant the searcher may see a former report on a similar subject, which will show him how others have done their work. THE RETURN OF THE REPORT. Ten hours of faithful work in each report is about the minimum ; if no satisfactory result is then reached, the notes may be shown the assistant and his approval asked, or a new subject tried. In any case credit cannot be given for reports unless handed in to the assistant on the day appointed, unless they bear the stamp of the Re- corder of the college. 129. Bibliographical Special Reports (see Handbook, 7, 8). OBJECT. The first report is intended to teach students how to find books and articles, how to cite references, and how to arrange results. SCOPE. To each student is assigned some person connected with the history of the United States. The report is to be a list of the printed books, pamphlets, and magazine articles bearing on that person, with a very brief statement of the public services which make him worthy of remembrance. No list of works by the person is desired. 128, 129] DIRECTIONS 257 AUTHORITIES. Students will be held responsible for all titles which can be obtained through the following authorities : (a) The bibliographical aids used in the course, especially Handbook, 11, 18, 19, 20; Guide, 16, 20, 25, 32, 33, 34. (6) The card catalogue in the Delivery Room of the Harvard College Library. (c) The encyclopaedias and biographical dictionaries in the Reading Room of the Library. (d) The bibliographical helps and library catalogues in the Reading Room of the Library, including F. Leypoldt, Ameri- can Catalogue. (e) Indexes to periodicals, to be found in the Reading Room, especially W. F. Poole, Index to Periodicals, and Supplements; W. I. Fletcher, A. L. A, Index ; L. A. Jones, Index to Legal Periodicals. (/) Bibliographies of books relating to the person, in biogra- phies, encyclopaedias, biographical dictionaries, or histories. (g) Accounts in collections of biographies, so far as con- veniently accessible. (7i) Accounts reached through the footnotes to detailed biographies or histories. SELECTION. Only those books are to be enumerated in which the whole, or a distinct or specific part, a chapter, section or article, however short, is devoted to the person. Thus, under Washington, it will not be necessary to enter scattered references from books primarily on the Revolution, or on the United States, or on Virginia ; but titles ought to be found in a collection of Lives of the Presidents, or of Great American Generals, or Essays on Members of the Federal Convention. Hence it is necessary to know what public station the person has filled. Since, however, in many cases the books, articles, and sections devoted wholly to one man are very few, the student who has only a scanty lot, after exhausting the biblio- 17 258 BIBLIOGRAPHICAL REPORTS [ graphical aids, may then add extracts from general histories and biographies, not less than one page in length, wholly given up to the man. METHODS. The most convenient method is to go through the bibliographical aids, setting down each promising title on a slip or card, and keeping them arranged alphabetically ; then to arrange in some logical order and write out consecutively. Students are not expected to call for a long list of books from the Library simply to verify titles. VERIFICATION. Students are expected to verify for them- selves the titles of all books accessible in the open part of the Harvard College Library. Insert the Library number of all books. The instructor will be very glad to have students search out books not in Cambridge, but to be found in the Boston Athenaeum, Boston Public Library, or other Boston libraries. The precise form of the title of books, if published before 1870, may usually be found for authors from A to S in J. Sabin, BibUotheca Americana ; if in print in 1876 or since that time, in F. Leypoldt, American Catalogue. FORM OF REPORT. Titles should be arranged in each section alphabetically by authors. References and abbreviations should be punctuated systematically. In order that the title be suffi- ciently full to identify the book, the place of publication and date should always be given, and the number of pages and size of the book when those particulars are found. All refer- ences to parts of books must show the precise volume and page. 130. Bibliographical Subjects. The list of public men below includes most of the names on which reports have already been prepared in HISTORY 13, and many others. In making up the assignments the most distinguished men have to be omitted, because experience shows that the material 129-130a] LIST OF PUBLIC MEN 259 is so large that a disproportionate amount of work must be spent upon them. On the other hand, it is important to choose persons who are not so insignificant that nothing has been written about them. isoa. Alphabetical List of Public Men. About five hundred and ten names appear in the list in this section. Of these most were famous in the Revolutionary and later history of the United States; a few in the period of dis- covery or in the colonial period. After each name appears the person's highest office or most characteristic calling. Lyraan Abbott (Clergyman and Author, N. Y.) Charles Francis Adams, Sr. (Dip- lomat, Mass.) Charles Francis Adams, Jr. (R.R. Pres., Author, Mass.) John Adams (Pres., Mass.) John Quincy Adams (Pres., Mass.) Samuel Adams (Statesman, Mass.) Nelson W. Aldrich (Sen., R.I.) Russell A. Alger (Sec. War, Mich.) Ethan Allen (Soldier, Vt.) William B. Allison (Sen.. Iowa) Adelbert Ames (Gov., Miss.) Fisher Ames (Repr., Mass.) Oliver Ames (Gov., Mass.) Robert Anderson (Soldier, Ky.) John Andre* (Soldier, England) John A. Andrew (Gov., Mass.) Edmund Andros (Royal Gov., Mass.) H. B. Anthony (Sen., R. I.) Nathan Appleton (Merchant, Mass.) John Armstrong (Envoy and Sec. War, N. Y.) Benedict Arnold (Soldier, N. Y.) Chester A. Arthur (Pres., N. Y.) John J. Astor (Merchant, N. Y.) Edward Atkinson (Critic, Mass.) Stephen Austin (Colonist, Texas) B George Bancroft (Historian, Mass.) N. P. Banks (Speaker, Mass.) James Barbour (Sec. War, Va.) Joel Barlow (Poet, Conn.) Clara Barton (Philanthropist, Mass.) James A. Bayard (Sen., Del.) Thomas F. Bayard (Sec. State, Del.) Henry Ward Beecher (Clergy- man, N. Y.) Alexander Graham Bell (In- ventor, Mass.) John Bell (Sen., Tenn.) Judah P. Benjamin (Sen., La.) Thomas H. Benton (Sen., Mo.) Nicholas Biddle (Pres. U. S. Bank, Pa.) 260 BIBLIOGRAPHICAL REPORTS [ James G. Birney (Philanthropist, Ala.) James G. Elaine (Speaker, Sen., Sec. State, Me.) Francis P. Blair (Soldier, Mo.) Montgomery Blair (P. M. Gen'l, Mo.) Richard P. Bland (Repr., Mo.) Daniel Boone (Pioneer, Ky.) George S. Boutwell (Gov., Mass.) Linn Boyd (Speaker, Ky.) William Bradford (Gov., Ply- mouth, Mass.) John Breckenridge (Sen., Ky.) John C. Breckinridge (Sen., Vice- Pres., Ky.) Calvin Brice (Sen., Ohio) John Bright (Statesman, Eng- land) Benjamin N. Bristow (Sec. Treas., Ky.) David C. Broderick (Sen., Cal.) Phillips Brooks (Clergyman, Mass.) Preston S. Brooks (Repr., S. C.) B. Gratz Brown (Sen., Mo.) Jacob Brown (Soldier, N. Y.) John Brown (Abolitionist, N. Y.) Blanche K. Bruce (Sen., Miss.) William J. Bryan (Statesman, Neb.) William Cullen Bryant (Poet, Editor, N. Y.) James Buchanan (Pres., Pa.) Simon B. Buckner (Soldier, Ky.) Anson Burlingame (Repr., Diplo- mat, Mass.) A. E. Burnside (Soldier, R. I.) Aaron Burr (Yice-Pres., N. Y.) B. F. Butler (Repr., Soldier, Gov., Mass.) B. F. Butler (Atty-Gen'l, N. Y.) Pierce Butler (Sen., S. C.) William O. Butler (Soldier, Ky.) C George Cabot (Sen., Mass.) John Cabot (Navigator, Eng- land) Sebastian Cabot (Navigator, England) John C. Calhoun (Sen., S. C.) Simon Cameron (Sen., Pa.) George W. Campbell (Sen., Tenn.) James Campbell (P. M. Gen'l, Pa.) John G. Carlisle (Sec. Treas., Ky.) Andrew Carnegie (Manuf. and Author, Pa.) Charles Carroll (Signer, Md.) Lewis Cass (Statesman, Mich.) William E. Chandler (Sen., N. H.) Zachariah Chandler (Sen., Mich.) William Ellery Charming (Cler- gyman, R. I.) Salmon P. Chase (Sen., Gov., Sec. Treas., Ohio) Samuel Chase (Judge, Md.) Langdon Cheves (Speaker, S. C.) L. E. Chittenden (Lawyer, N. Y.) Joseph H. Choate (Diplomat, N. Y.) Rufus Choate (Jurist, Mass.) William C. C. Claiborne (Gov., La.) George Rogers Clark (Explorer, Va.) John Clarke (Physician, R. I.) Cassius M. Clay (Diplomat, Ky.) Clement C. Clay (Sen., Ala.) Henry Clay (Sen., Sec. State, Ky.) 130a] LIST OF PUBLIC MEN 261 John M. Clayton (Sec. State, Del.) Grover Cleveland (Pres., N. Y.) DeW T itt Clinton (Sen., Gov., N. Y.) George P. Clinton (Vice-Pres., N. Y.) Howell Cobb (Sec. Treas., Ga.) William F. Cody (Scout, Iowa) Cadwallader Colden (Gov., N. Y.) Bird S. Coler (Comptroller, N. Y.) Schuyler Coif ax (Vice-Pres., Ind.) Christopher Columbus (Discov- erer, Spain) E. H. Conger (Diplomat, Iowa) Roscoe Conkling (Sen., N. Y.) James Fenimore Cooper (Author, N. Y.) Peter Cooper (Merchant and Philanthropist, N. Y.) Thomas Corwin (Sen., Ohio) Jacob D. Cox (Sec. Int., Ohio) S. S. Cox (Repr., N. Y.) Matthew Cradock (First Gov., Mass. Bay Co.) Prudence Crandall (Philanthro- pist, Conn.) George W. Crawford (Sec. War, Ga.) William H.Crawford (Sec. Treas., Ga.) Charles F. Crisp (Speaker, Ga.) John J. Crittenden (Sen., Ky.) Thomas L. Crittenden (Soldier, Richard Croker (Politician, N. Y.) Andrew G. Curtin (Gov., Pa.) Caleb Cusning (Diplomat, Mass.) George A. Custer (Soldier, Ohio) Manasseh Cutler (Clergyman and Pioneer, Conn.) D Alexander J. Dallas (Sec. Treas., Pa.) George M. Dallas (Vice-Pres., Pa.) R. H. Dana, Jr. (Author, Mass.) Cushman K. Davis (Sen., Minn.) Jefferson Davis (Pres., C. S. A., Miss.) John Davis (Sen., Mass.) John W. Davis (Speaker, Ind.) William R. Day (Sec. State,Ohio) Jonathan Dayton (Speaker, N. J.) W. L. Dayton (Sen., N. J.) Silas Deane (Diplomat, Conn.) Henry Dearborn (Sec.War, Mass.) William Dennison (Gov., Ohio) Chauncey M. Depew (Sen., N.Y.) George Dewey (Admiral, Vt.) Samuel Dexter (Sec. War, Mass.) John Dickinson (Statesman, Del.) Nelson Dingley, Jr. (Repr., Me.) Dorothea Dix (Philanthropist, Mass.) John A. Dix (Soldier, N. Y.) Thomas W. Dorr (Gov., R. I.) Fred Douglass (Agitator, Md.) Stephen A. Douglas (Sen., 111.) Neal Dow (Prohibitionist, Me.) Sir Francis Drake (Navigator, England) William J. Duane (Sec. Treas., Pa.) Joseph Dudley (Gov., Mass.) William Dummer (Lieut. Gov., Mass.) Timothy Dwight (Educator, Conn.) E John H. Eaton (Sec. War, Tenn.) George F. Edmunds (Sen., Vt.) 262 BIBLIOGRAPHICAL REPORTS Jonathan Edwards (Clergyman, Mass.) Charles W. Eliot (College Pres., Mass.) Stephen B. Elkins (Sec. War, West Va.) William Ellery (Statesman, R. I.) Oliver Ellsworth (Sen., Chief Jus- tice, Conn.) Ralph Waldo Emerson (Seer, Mass.) John Endicott (Gov., Mass.) W. II. English (Statesman, Ind.) John W. Eppes (Sen., Va.) John Ericsson (Inventor, N. Y.) George Eustis (Jurist, La.) Robley D. Evans (Naval officer, Va.) William M. Evarts (Sen., N. Y.) Edward Everett (Orator, Mass.) Thomas Ewing (Sen., Ohio) Lucius Fairchild (Gov., Diplo- mat, Wis.) David G. Farragut (Admiral, Tenn.) Reuben E. Fenton (Sen., N. Y.) William P. Fessenden (Sec. Treas., Me.) Cyrus W. Field (Capitalist, N.Y.) Millard Fillmore (Pres., N. Y.) Hamilton Fish (Sec. State, N. Y.) John Fiske (Author, Mass.) Roswell P. Flower (Gov., N. Y.) John B. Floyd (Sec. War, Va.) Charles J. Folger (Sec. Treas., N. Y.) John Forsythe (Sen., Ga.) Benjamin Franklin (Allrounder, Pa.) John C. Fre'mont (Soldier, Cal.) Philip Freneau (Poet, N. Y.) William P. Frye (Sen., Me.) Robert Fulton (Inventor, Pa.) G Albert Gallatin (Sec. Treas., Pa.) James A. Garfield (Pres., Ohio) William Lloyd Garrison (Philan- thropist, Mass.) Henry George (Author, N. Y.) Elbridge Gerry (Vice-Pres., Mass.) Joshua R. Giddings (Repr., Ohio) Stephen Girard (Philanthropist, Pa.) Arthur P. Gorman (Sen., Md.) Joseph Graham (Soldier, N. C.) William A. Graham (Sen., N. C.) Gideon Granger (P. M. Gen'l, N.Y.) U. S. Grant (Pres., 111.) Horace Greeley (Journalist and Author, N. Y.) A. W. Greely (Arctic Explorer, Mass.) Nathanael Greene (Soldier, R. I.) F T. Greenhalge (Gov., Mass.) Andrew Gregg (Sen., Pa.) David McM. Gregg (Soldier, Pa.) W. Q. Gresham (Sec. State, Ind.) Robert C. Grier (Judge, Pa.) Felix Grundy (Sen., Tenn.) H John P. Hale (Sen., N. H.) Nathan Hale (Soldier, Conn.) Alexander Hamilton (Sec. Treas., N. Y.) Hannibal Hamlin (Vice-Pres., Me.) 130a] LIST OF PUBLIC MEN 263 Wade Hampton (Soldier, S. C.) John Hancock (Statesman, Mass.) W. S. Hancock (Soldier, N. Y.) Marcus A. Hanna (Sen., Ohio) Robert G. Harper (Sen., Md.) Benjamin Harrison (Pres., Ind.) Carter Harrison (Mayor, 111.) William H. Harrison (Pres., Ind.) Sir John Hawkins (Navigator, England) John Hay (Diplomat, Ind.) R. B. Hayes (Pres., Ohio) Robert Y. Hayne (Sen., S. C.) Thomas P. Hendricks (Vice- Pres., Ind.) Patrick Henry (Statesman, Va.) Richard Hildreth (Historian, Mass.) David B. Hill (Sen., N. Y.) Isaac Hill (Politician, N. H.) George F. Hoar (Sen., Mass.) Garrett Hobart ( Vice-Pres. , N". J.) O. W. Holmes (Author, Mass.) Joseph Hooker (Soldier, Mass.) Stephen Hopkins (Signer, R. I.) Francis Hopkinson (Author, Pa.) Samuel Houston (Gov., Texas.) Isaac Hull (Naval officer, Conn.) William Hull (Soldier, Conn.) David Hunter (Soldier, Va.) Robert M. T. Hunter (Sen., Va.) Thomas Hutchinson (Gov., Mass.) Jared Tngersoll (Statesman, Pa.) Robert G. Ingersoll (Orator and Lawyer, N. Y.) Washington Irving (Author, N. Y.) Andrew Jackson (Pres., Tenn.) Thomas J. Jackson (Soldier, Va.) John Jay (Chief Justice, N. Y.) William Jay (Philanthropist, N. Y.) Thomas Jefferson (Pres., Va.) William Travers Jerome (Re- former, N. Y.) Andrew Johnson (Pres., Tenn.) Herschel V. Johnson (Sen., Ga.) Reverdy Johnson (Sen., Md.) Richard M. Johnson (Vice-Pres., Ky.) Sir William Johnson (Fron- tiersman, N. Y.) William S. Johnson (Scholar, Conn.) Albert S. Johnston (Soldier, Ky.) John Paul Jones (Naval officer, Va.) George W. Julian (Repr., Ind.) K John Kelly (Politician, N. Y.) Frances Anne Kemble (Actress, Mass.) James Kent (Jurist, N. Y.) Michael C. Kerr (Speaker, Ind.) John H. King (Soldier, Mich.) Rufus King (Sen., N. Y.) Henry Knox (Sec, War, Mass.) Marquis de Lafayette (Soldier, France) L. Q. C. Lamar (Sec. Int., Miss.) James Lane (Leader Free State Party, Kan.) Henry Laurens (Statesman, S. C.) Charles Lee (Soldier, Va.) R. II. Lee (Statesman, Va.) 264 BIBLIOGRAPHICAL REPORTS [ Robert E. Lee (Soldier, Va.) Meriwether Lewis (Explorer, Term.) ABRAHAM LINCOLN (Pres., 111.) Benjamin Lincoln (Gov., Mass.) Levi Lincoln (Gov., Mass.) Robert T. Lincoln (Diplomat, 111.) Mary A. Livermore (Agitator, Mass.) Edward Livingston (Sec. State, N. Y.) Robert 11. Livingston (Diplomat, N. Y.) H. C. Lodge (Sen., Mass.) John A. Logan (Soldier, 111.) John D. Long (Sec. Navy, Mass.) H. W. Longfellow (Poet, Mass.) James Longstreet (Soldier, S. C.) Seth Low (Mayor, N. Y.) J. R. Lowell (Poet, Mass.) Wilson Lumpkin (Sen., Ga.) M S. C. McCall (Repr., Mass.) G. B. McClellan (Soldier, N. J.) Benjamin McCulloch (Soldier, Term.) Hugh McCulloch (Sec. Treas., Ind.) Thomas Macdonough (Naval officer, Del.) Irvin McDowell (Soldier, Ohio) George McDuffie (Sen., S. C.) James McIIenry (Sec. War, Md.) Thomas McKean (Statesman, Pa.) William McKinley (Pres., Ohio) Louis McLane (Sec. State, Del.) Robert M. McLane (Diplomat, Del.) John McLean (P. M. Gen'l, Ohio) Alexander Macomb (Soldier, Mich.) William H. Macorab (Naval officer, Mich.) Nathaniel Macon (Speaker, N. C.) James B. McPherson (Soldier, Ohio) James Madison (Pres., Va.) Willie P. Mangum (Sen., N. C.) Horace Mann (Educator, Mass.) Daniel Manning (Sec. Treas., N. Y.) William L. Marcy (Sec. State, N. Y.) George P. Marsh (Diplomat, Yt.) John Marshall (Chief Justice, Va.) Luther Martin (Atty.-Gen'l, Md.) George Mason (Statesman, Va.) James M. Mason (Sen., Va.) Jeremiah Mason (Financier, N. H.) Cotton Mather (Clergyman and Author, Mass.) Increase Mather (Pres. Harvard, Mass.) Samuel J. May (Abolitionist, N. Y.) George G. Meade (Soldier, Pa.) Montgomery C. Meigs (Soldier, Ohio) Return J. Meigs, Jr. (P. M. Gen'l, Ohio) Thomas Mifflin (Gov., Pa.) Nelson A. Miles (Soldier, Mass.) Roger Q. Mills (Sen., Texas.) O. McK. Mitchell (Soldier and Astronomer, Ky.) James Monroe (Pres., Va.) Edwin D. Morgan (Sen., N. Y.) 130a] LIST OF PUBLIC MEN 265 John H. Morgan (Soldier, Ky.) J. Pierpont Morgan (Financier, N. Y.) Justin Morrill (Sen., Vt.) Gouverneur Morris (Statesman, N. Y.) Robert Morris (Financier, Pa.) S. F. B. Morse (Inventor, N. Y.) Levi P. Morton (Vice-Pres., N. Y.) Oliver P. Morton (Sen., Ind.) John S. Mosby (Confederate Sol- dier, Va.) Fred. A. Muhlenberg (Speaker, Pa.) John P. G. Muhlenberg (Repr., Pa.) O James Oglethorpe (Philanthro- pist, Ga.) Richard Olney (Sec. State, Mass.) John Boyle O'Reilly (Author, Mass.) James L. Orr (Speaker, S. C.) Harrison G. Otis (Sen., Mass.) James Otis (Statesman, Mass.) Thomas Paine (Author, Pa.) Charles H. Parkhurst (Clergy- man, N. Y.) Francis Parkman (Historian, Mass.) Theophilus Parsons (Jurist, Mass.) William Paterson (Statesman, N. J.) William Penn (Statesman, Pa.) William Pennington (Speaker, N. J.) Matthew C. Perry (Naval officer, R. I.) Oliver H. Perry (Naval officer, R. I.) James L. Petigru (Statesman, S. C.) Richard F. Pettigrew (Sen., So. Dak.) E. J. Phelps (Diplomat, Vt.) Wendell Phillips (Orator, Mass.) Sir William Phips (Gov., Mass.) Francis W. Pickens (Sen., S. C.) Timothy Pickering (Sen., Mass.) Franklin Pierce (Pres., N. H.) Gideon J. Pillow (Soldier, Tenn.) John S. Pillsbury (Gov., Minn.) Charles Pinckney (Sen., S. C.) C. C. Pinckney (Diplomat, S. C.) Thomas Pinckney (Diplomat, S. C.) William Pinkney (Sen., Md.) Thomas C. Platt (Sen., N. Y.) Edgar A. Poe (Author, Va.) J. R. Poinsett (Diplomat, S. C.) James K. Polk (Pres., Tenn.) John Pope (Soldier, 111.) David Porter (Naval officer, Mass.) David D. Porter (Admiral, Pa.) James M. Porter (Sec. War, Pa.) Edward Preble (Naval officer, Me.) Israel Putnam (Soldier, Conn.) Rufus Putnam (Soldier, Conn.) Q Matthew Quay (Sen., Pa.) Josiah Quincy (elder) (Pres. Harvard, Mass.) Josiah Quincy (younger) (Mayor, Boston, Mass.) John H. Quitman (Repr., Miss. 3 266 BIBLIOGRAPHICAL REPORTS [ R Sir Walter Ralegh (Navigator, England) Samuel J. Randall (Speaker, Pa.) Edmund Randolph (Sec. State, Va.) John Randolph (Repr., Va.) Peyton Randolph (Statesman, Va.) Robert Rantoul (Sen., Mass.) John A. Reagan (Sen., Texas) Joseph Reed (Gov. , Pa.) Thomas B. Reed (Speaker, Me.) Paul Revere (Rev. Patriot, Mass.) A. G. Riddle (Repr., Ohio) Charles Robinson (Gov., Kan.) John Rodgers (Na val officer, Md.) Caesar Rodney (Statesman, Del.) Daniel Rodney (Jurist, Del.) Theodore Roosevelt (Pres., N. Y.) Elihu Root (Sec. War, N. Y.) William S. Rosecrans (Soldier, Ohio) Benjamin Rush (Statesman, Pa.) William E. Russell (Gov., Mass.) Edward Rutledge (Gov., S. C.) John Rutledge (Statesman, S. C.) Arthur St. Clair (Soldier, Pa.) Gurdon Saltonstall (Gov., Conn.) William T. Sampson, (Admiral, N.Y.) Minot J. Savage (Clergyman, N.Y.) Alexander Scammel (Soldier, N. H.) W. S. Schley (Admiral, Md.) Carl Schurz (Sec. Int., N. Y.) Philip Schuyler (Soldier, N. Y.) Dred Scott (Slave, Mo.) Winfield Scott (Soldier, Va.) Theodore Sedgwick (Sen., Mass.) Samuel Sewall (Judge, Mass.) William H. Seward (Sec.. State, N.Y.) Horatio Seymour (Gov., N. Y.) Robert G. Shaw (Soldier, Mass.) Daniel Shays (Soldier, Mass.) P. H. Sheridan (Soldier, Ohio) John Sherman (Sec. State, Ohio) Roger Sherman (Sen., Conn.) W. T. Sherman (Soldier, Ohio) John Slidell (Sen., La.) Gerritt Smith (Philanthropist, N. Y.) Joseph Smith (Mormon, Mo.) Robert Smith (Sec. State, Md.) Jared Sparks (Historian, Mass.) John C. Spencer (Sec. War, N.Y.) J. C. Spooner (Sen., Wis.) Leland Stanford (Capitalist, Cal.) Edwin M. Stan ton (Sec. War, Pa.) George L. Stearns (Soldier, Mass.) Alexander H. Stephens (Vice- Pres., C. S. A., Ga.) Thaddeus Stevens (Repr., Pa.) Adlai E. Stevenson (Vice-Pres., 111.) Andrew Stevenson (Diplomat, Va.) Charles Stewart (Naval officer, N. J.) Richard Stockton (Statesman, N. J.) Robert F. Stockton (Naval offi- cer, N. J.) Joseph Story (Jurist, Mass.) Caleb Strong (Gov., Mass.) James Sullivan (Gov., Mass. ) Charles Sumner (Sen., Mass.) 130a] LIST OF PUBLIC MEN 267 Roger B. Taney (Chief Justice, Md.) James Tanner (Gov., 111.) Hannis Taylor (Diplomat and Author, Ala.) John W. Taylor (Speaker, N. Y.) Zachary Taylor (Pres., Va.) George" H. Thomas (Soldier, Va.) Allan G. Thurman (Sen., Ohio) Samuel J. Tilden (Gov., N. Y.) Benjamin R. Tillman (Sen., S. C.) Daniel Tompkins (Vice-Pres., N. Y.) Robert Toombs (Sen., Ga.) Benjamin F. Tracy (Sec. Navy, N. Y.) George Troup (Gov., Ga.) Jonathan Trumbull (Gov., Conn.) James Turner (Sen., N. C.) William M. Tweed (Politician, X. Y.) John Tyler (Pres., Va.) U Abel P. Upshur (Sec. State, Va.) Clement C. Vallandigham (Repr., Ohio.) Martin Van Buren (Pres., N. Y.) Stephen Van Rensselaer (Repr., N. Y.) Joseph B. Varnum (Speaker, Mass.) W Benjamin F. Wade (Sen., Ohio) James S. Wads worth (Soldier, N. Y.) Morrison R. Waite (Chief Justice, Ohio) Robert J. Walker (Sec. Treas., Miss.) John Wanamaker (P. M. Gen'l, Pa.) Gouverneur K. Warren (Soldier, N. Y.) Joseph Warren (Soldier, Mass.) E. B. Washburn (Diplomat, 111.) Cadwallader C. Washburne (Gov., Wis.) Booker T. Washington (Edu- cator, Ala.) Bushrod Washington (Judge,Va.) George Washington (Pres., Va.) Daniel Webster (Sec. State, Mass.) Thurlow Weed (Journalist, N.Y.) John Wentworth (Rep., 111.) Henry Wheaton (Jurist, R. I.) Joseph Wheeler (Soldier, Ala.) Andrew D. White (Diplomat, N. Y.) Hugh L. White (Sen., Tenn.) John White (Speaker, Ky.) Eli Whitney (Inventor, Conn.) John G. Whittier (Poet, Mass.) Charles Wilkes (Naval officer, N. Y.) William Wilkins (Sen., Pa.) James Wilkinson (Soldier, Md.) Roger Williams (Clergyman, R.I.) Hugh Williamson (Repr., N. C.) David Wilmot (Repr., Pa.) Henry Wilson (Vice-Pres., Mass.) James Wilson (Judge, Pa.) Fitz John Winthrop (Gov., Conn.) John Winthrop (Gov., Mass.) Robert C. Winthrop (Speaker, Mass.) 268 BIBLIOGRAPHICAL REPORTS [ Henry A. Wise (Repr., Va.) Oliver Wolcott (Soldier and Judge, Conn.) Roger Wolcott (Gov., Mass.) Leonard Wood (Soldier and Gov., Cuba, Mass.) Levi Woodbury (Sen., N. H.) Elizur Wright (Journalist and Abolitionist, Mass.) Silas Wright (Sen., N. Y.) Brigham Young (Mormon, Utah.) isob. List of Public Men arranged by States and Countries. ALABAMA. James G. Birney; Clement C. Clay; Hannis Taylor ; Booker T. Washington ; Joseph Wheeler. CALIFORNIA. David C. Broderick; John C. Fremont; Leland Stanford. CONNECTICUT. Joel Barlow ; Prudence Crandall ; Manasseh Cutler; Silas Deane ; Timothy Dwight; Oliver Ellsworth; Nathan Hale ; Isaac Hull ; William Hull ; William S. Johnson ; Israel Putnam ; Ruf us Putnam ; Gurdon Saltoristall ; Roger Sherman ; Jonathan Trumbull ; Eli Whitney ; Fitz John Win- throp; Oliver Wolcott. DELAWARE. James A. Bayard ; Thomas F. Bayard ; John M. Clayton ; John Dickinson ; Thomas Macdonough ; Louis McLane ; Robert M. McLane; Caesar Rodney; Daniel Rodney. GEORGIA. Ho well Cobb; George W. Crawford; William H. Crawford; Charles F. Crisp ; John Forsythe ; Herschel V. John- son ; Wilson Lumpkin ; James Oglethorpe ; Alexander H. Stephens ; Robert Toombs ; George Troup. ILLINOIS. Stephen A. Douglas; U. S. Grant; Carter Har- rison; Abraham Lincoln; Robert T. Lincoln; John A. Logan; John Pope; Adlai E. Stevenson; James Tanner; E. B. Wash- burn; John Wentworth. INDIANA. Schuyler Coif ax ; John W. Davis ; W. H. English ; W. Q. Gresham ; Benjamin Harrison ; W. H. Harrison ; John Hay ; Thomas P. Hendricks ; George W. Julian ; Michael C. Kerr ; Hugh McCulloch ; Oliver P. Morton. 130a, 130b] PUBLIC MEN BY STATES 269 IOWA. William B. Allison ; William F. Cody; E. H. Conger. KANSAS. James Lane ; Charles Robinson. KENTUCKY. Robert Anderson ; Daniel Boone ; Linn Boyd ; John Breckenridge ; John C. Breckinridge ; Benjamin N. Bris- tow; S. B. Buckner; William O. Butler; John G. Carlisle; Cassius M. Clay ; Henry Clay ; J. J. Crittenden ; Thomas L. Crittenden; Richard M. Johnson; Albert Sidney Johnston; O. McK. Mitchell; John H. Morgan; John White. LOUISIANA. Judah P. Benjamin; William C. C. Claiborne; George Eustis; John Slidell. MAINE. James G. Blaine ; Nelson Dingley, Jr. ; Neal Dow ; William P. Fessenden; William P. Frye; Hannibal Hamlin; Edward Preble; Thomas B. Reed. MARYLAND. Charles Carroll ; Samuel Chase ; Fred Doug- lass ; Arthur P. Gorman ; Robert G. Harper ; Reverdy John- son; James McHenry; Luther Martin; William Pinkney; JohnRodgers; Winfield S. Schley; Robert Smith ; Roger B. Taney; James Wilkinson. MASSACHUSETTS. Charles Francis Adams, Sr. ; Charles Francis Adams, Jr. ; John Adams; John Quincy Adams ; Sam- uel Adams ; Fisher Ames ; Oliver Ames ; John A. Andrew ; Edmond Andros ; Nathan Appleton ; Edward Atkinson ; George Bancroft; Nathaniel P. Banks; Clara Barton; A. G. Bell; George S. Bout well ; William Bradford ; Phillips Brooks ; Anson Burlingame ; Benjamin F. Butler; George Cabot; Rufus Choate; Matthew Cradock ; Caleb Gushing; R. H. Dana, Jr. ; John Davis ; Henry Dearborn ; Samuel Dexter ; Dorothea Dix ; Joseph Dudley ; William Dummer ; Jonathan Edwards ; Charles W. Eliot; Ralph Waldo Emerson; John Endicott ; Edward Everett ; John Fiske ; William Lloyd Garrison ; Elbridge Gerry ; A. W. Greely; F. T. Greenhalge; John Hancock; Richard Hildreth; George F. Hoar; O. W. Holmes; Joseph Hooker; Thomas Hutchinson ; Frances Anne Kemble ; Henry Knox ; 270 BIBLIOGRAPHICAL REPORTS [ Benjamin Lincoln; Levi Lincoln; Mary A. Livermore; Henry Cabot Lodge; John D. Long; H. W. Longfellow; James R. Lowell; S. C. McCall ; Horace Mann ; Cotton Mather; Increase Mather ; Nelson A. Miles; Richard Olney ; John Boyle O'Reilly ; Harrison Gray Otis; James Otis ; Francis Parkman ; Theophilus Parsons ; Wendell Phillips ; Sir William Phips ; Timothy Pick- ering ; David Porter ; Josiah Quincy (elder) ; Josiah Quincy (younger) ; Robert Rantoul ; Paul Revere; William E. Russell; Theodore Sedgwick ; Samuel Sewall ; Robert G. Shaw ; Daniel Shays ; Jared Sparks ; George L. Stearns ; Joseph Story ; Caleb Strong ; James Sullivan ; Charles Sumner ; Joseph B. Varnum ; Joseph Warren; Daniel Webster; John G. Whittier; Henry Wilson ; John Winthrop ; Robert C. Winthrop ; Roger Wol- cott ; Leonard Wood ; Elizur Wright. MICHIGAN. Russell A. Alger ; Lewis Cass ; Zachariah Chan- dler ; JohnH. King ; Alexander Macomb ; William H. Macomb. MINNESOTA. Cushman K. Davis ; John S. Pillsbury. MISSISSIPPI. Adelbert Ames ; Blanche K. Bruce ; Jefferson Davis ; L. Q. C. Lamar; John H. Quitman ; Robert J. Walker. MISSOURI. Thomas H. Benton ; Francis P. Blair ; Mont- gomery Blair ; Richard P. Bland ; B. Gratz Brown ; Dred Scott ; Joseph Smith. NEBRASKA. William J. Bryan. NEW HAMPSHIRE. William E. Chandler ; John P. Hale ; Isaac Hill ; Jeremiah Mason ; Franklin Pierce ; Alexander Scammel; Levi Woodbury. NEW JERSEY. Jonathan Dayton ; William L. Dayton ; Garrett Hobart ; George B. McClellan ; William Paterson ; William Pennington ; Charles Stewart ; Richard Stockton ; Robert F. Stockton. NEW YORK. Lyman Abbott ; John Armstrong ; Benedict Arnold ; Chester A. Arthur ; John J. Astor ; Henry Ward Beecher ; Jacob Brown ; John Brown ; Aaron Burr ; Benjamin 130b] PUBLIC MEN BY STATES 111 F. Butler ; L. E. Chittenden ; Joseph H. Choate ; Grover Cleve- land ; DeWitt Clinton ; George Clinton ; Cadwallader Golden ; Bird S. Coler ; Roscoe Conkling ; James Fenimore Cooper ; Peter Cooper ; S. 8. Cox ; Richard Croker ; Chauncey M. Depew; John A. Dix; John Ericsson; William M. Evarts ; Reuben E. Fenton ; Cyrus W. Field ; Millard Fillmore ; Ham- ilton Fish; Roswell P. Flower; Charles J. Folger; Philip Freneau ; Henry George ; Gideon Granger ; Horace Greeley ; Alexander Hamilton; Winfield S. Hancock; David B. Hill; Robert G. Ingersoll ; Washington Irving ; John Jay ; William Jay ; William Travers Jerome ; Sir William Johnson ; John Kelly ; James Kent ; Ruf us King ; Edward Livingston ; Robert R. Livingston ; Seth Low ; Daniel Manning ; William L. Marcy ; Samuel J. May ; Edwin D. Morgan ; John Pierpont Morgan ; Gouverneur Morris; Samuel F. B. Morse; Levi P. Morton; Charles H. Parkhurst ; Thomas C. Platt ; Theodore Roosevelt ; Elihu Root; William T. Sampson; Minot J. Savage; Carl Schurz ; Philip Schuyler ; William H. Seward ; Horatio Sey- mour; Gerritt Smith; John C. Spencer; John W. Taylor; Samuel J. Tilden; Daniel Tompkins; Benjamin F. Tracy; William M. Tweed ; Martin Van Buren ; Stephen Van Rens- selaer ; James S. Wads worth ; Gouverneur K. W'arren ; Thurlow Weed ; Andrew D. White ; Charles Wilkes ; Silas Wright. NORTH CAROLINA. Joseph Graham ; William A. Graham ; Nathaniel Macon; Willie P. Mangum ; James Turner; Hugh Williamson. OHIO. Calvin Brice ; Salmon P. Chase ; Thomas Corwin ; Jacob D. Cox ; George A. Custer ; William R. Day ; William Dennison; Thomas Ewing ; James A. Garfield ; Joshua R. Giddings; Marcus A. Hanna; R. B. Hayes; Irvin McDowell; William McKinley ; John McLean ; James B. McPherson ; Montgomery C. Meigs ; Return J. Meigs, Jr. ; A. G. Riddle ; 272 BIBLIOGRAPHICAL REPORTS [ William S. Rosecrans ; Philip H. Sheridan ; John Sherman ; William T. Sherman ; Allan G. Thurman ; Clement C. Vallan- digham ; Benjamin F. Wade ; Morrison R. Waite. PENNSYLVANIA. Nicholas Biddle ; James Buchanan ; Simon Cameron ; James Campbell ; Andrew Carnegie ; Andrew G. Curtin; Alexander J. Dallas; George M. Dallas; William J. Duane ; Benjamin Franklin ; Robert Fulton ; Albert Gallatin ; Stephen Girard ; Andrew Gregg ; David McM. Gregg ; Rob- ert C. Grier; Francis Hopkinson; Jared Ingersoll; Thomas McKean ; George G. Meade ; Thomas Mifflin ; Robert Morris ; Frederick A. Muhlenberg ; John P. G. Muhlenberg ; Thomas Paine ; William Penn ; David D. Porter ; James M. Porter ; Matthew Quay ; Samuel J. Randall ; Joseph Reed ; Benjamin Rush ; Arthur St. Clair ; Edwin M. Stanton ; Thaddeus Stevens ; John Wanamaker; William Wilkins; David Wilmot; James Wilson. RHODE ISLAND. Nelson W. Aldrich ; H. B. Anthony; A. E. Burnside ; William Ellery Channing ; John Clarke ; Thomas W. Dorr ; William Ellery ; Nathanael Greene ; Stephen Hop- kins ; Matthew C. Perry ; Oliver H. Perry ; Henry Wheatou ; Roger Williams. SOUTH CAROLINA. Preston S. Brooks ; Pierce Butler; John C. Calhoun ; Langdon Cheves ; Wade Hampton ; Robert Y. Hayne; Henry Laurens; Richard Henry Lee; James Long- street; George McDuffie; James L. Orr; James L. Petigru; Francis W. Pickens; Charles Pinckney; C. C. Pinckney ; Thomas Pinokney ; J. S. Poinsett; Edward Rutledge; John Rutledge ; Benjamin R. Tillman. SOUTH DAKOTA. Richard F. Pettigrew. TENNESSEE. John Bell ; George W. Campbell ; John H. Eaton ; David G. Farragut ; Felix Grundy ; Andrew Jackson ; Andrew Johnson ; Meriwether Lewis ; Benjamin McCulloch ; Gideon J. Pillow ; James K. Polk ; Hugh L. White. 130b, 131] PUBLIC MEN BY STATES 273 TEXAS. Stephen Austin ; Samuel Houston ; Roger Q. Mills ; John A. Reagan. UTAH. Brigham Young. VERMONT. Ethan Allen ; George Dewey ; George F. Ed- munds ; George P. Marsh ; Justin Morrill ; E. J. Phelps. VIRGINIA. James Barbour; George Rogers Clark; John W. Eppes; Robley D. Evans; John B. Floyd; Patrick Henry; David Hunter; Robert M. T. Hunter; Thomas J. Jackson; Thomas Jefferson ; John Paul Jones ; Charles Lee ; Richard Henry Lee; Robert E. Lee; James Madison; John Marshall ; George Mason; James M. Mason; James Monroe; John S. Mosby ; Edgar A. Poe ; Edmund Randolph ; John Randolph ; Peyton Randolph; Winfield Scott; Andrew Stevenson ; Zachary Taylor ; George H. Thomas ; John Tyler ; Abel P. Upshur ; Bushrod Washington ; George Washington ; Henry A. Wise. WEST VIRGINIA. Stephen B. Elkins. > WISCONSIN. Lucius Fairchild ; J. C. Spooner ; Cadwallader C. Washburne. ENGLAND. John Andre ; John Bright ; John Cabot ; Sebas- tian Cabot ; Sir Francis Drake ; Sir John Hawkins ; Sir Walter Ralegh. FRANCE. Marquis de Lafayette. SPAIN. Christopher Columbus. 131. Constitutional Special Reports. OBJECT. This report is intended, like the weekly papers (Handbook, 26), to train students in applying to specific cases the general principles of the Constitution ; but instead of undertaking to give an opinion off-hand and without the use of books, they will be expected to bring to bear upon their ques- tion all the authorities which they can command. SCOPE. Each topic will be a simple question in constitu- tional law, and, so far as possible, a very detailed question. 18 274 CONSTITUTIONAL REPORTS [ The report is to be a brief statement of the conclusions which the student has reached, with the reasons for those conclusions ; but in the report it is expected that objections to the position taken will be stated and discussed, and the reasons for setting them aside will be made apparent. Students are cautioned against making these reports vague, and especially against copying opinions of jurists or statesmen without showing how they affect the results. A series of bald extracts from, or ab- stracts of, authorities is not considered a report. It is expected that the subject will be logically developed in analyzed heads, each worked out in arguments backed up by references to the authorities upon which the opinion is based ; and brief quota- tions may well be introduced to show the character of the evidence. Special notice will be taken of a systematic analysis of the subject and a neat form of statement, in which the main heads of the argument are clearly stated. AUTHORITIES. Bibliographies of the Constitution will be found in Handbook, 19, 21c, 32, 34, 35, 36, 37-61, 95- 123, 138; Justin Winsor, Narrative and Critical History, VII, 255-266 ; W. E. Foster, References to the Constitution ; A. B. Hart, Federal Government, 38, 469, and Actual Government; J. G. Barnwell, Reading Notes to the Constitution. Use also the bibliographical introductions or footnotes to the best books on constitutional history and constitutional law (Handbook, 31a, 31J). Students will be expected to refer to any parts of the Con- stitution bearing upon their subject, to study the constitutional treatises, to examine acts of Congress and other evidences of the practice of the government with reference to their subject, and to make use of Supreme Court Reports and other re- positories of official legal opinions (Handbook, 31c). The principal authorities on constitutional law will be found in the alcove containing books on government. Duplicates of 131, 132] DIRECTIONS 275 many of these books will be found in the Evans Library, and in any good public or private law library. The footnotes to these treatises should lead to other commentaries, and especially to decisions of the United States Supreme Court and other courts. Some of the treatises are enumerated in Handbook, 32&, and lists of legal reports of cases and aids to the study of constitutional questions will be found in Handbook, 32c. CONFERENCE. In addition to the conference hours of the assistant, the instructor may himself be consulted at hours to be hereafter announced. METHOD. The easiest and most complete way of handling the subject is to take notes upon loose sheets, appropriating one for each branch of the subject as it is developed. The student may then go through all the authorities, searching simply for discussions which may seem to him to bear upon the point, and taking his references, point by point. He will then have a body of classified references, and may go back to those which he has marked as being most helpful. By com- paring the various authorities thus collected in each sub- division of the subject seriatim, he will be able to come to a decision for himself. 132. Subjects for Constitutional Special Reports. Out of this list of about 1,000 subjects for investigation in con- stitutional subjects, many are discussed at more or less length by the treatise writers, or in special monographs. References at the section heads will lead to some of the special materials. In general the topics are very limited, so that the available materials can be exhausted. Of the following subjects a large number have been tested and give opportunity for proper discussion. Students may arrange for a change of subject if it seems hard to find suitable evidence. In Handbook, 139-153, will be found lists of questions in practical govern- 276 CONSTITUTIONAL REPORTS [ ment, many of which might also be used for constitutional reports. 1323. Genesis and Nature of the Union (see Hand- book, 19a-19c, 21a, 21c, 33-38, 99, 141a). REVOLUTION. 1. Was Massachusetts ever sovereign and independent? 2. Has any State existed without being a State in the Union ? 3. Was the issue of Continental paper notes really a legal tender ? 4. Were ordinances of the Continental Congress binding on the people of the United States after 1789? 5. Did the Second Continental Congress exercise sovereign powers ? 6. Were the people bound to obey the resolutions of the Continental Congress? 7. Were the States bound to obey the resolutions of the Continental Congress? THE CONFEDERATION. 8. Was the Confederation a league of sovereign States ? 9. Had the Congress of the Confederation any power of enforcing its decrees? 10. Had the Congress of the Confederation supreme juris- diction in prize cases? 11. Were the States bound to obey the ordinances of Con- gress ? 12. Had the Confederation constitutional power over the Indians ? 13. Could the Confederation keep up a standing army? 14. Was the Northwest Ordinance a constitutional act? 132, 132a] NATURE OF THE UNION 277 15. Was Patrick Henry's theory of State rights under the Confederation sound? 16. Had the States a right to secede from the Confederation ? 17. Was the Confederation ever legally dissolved? RATIFICATION OF THE CONSTITUTION. 18. Is the Constitution a compact between the States and the general government? 19. Who were " the people of the United States " in 1787? 20. Is the Federal constitution supreme over the Massachu- setts constitution of 1780? 21. Did the States forever bind themselves by their ratifica- tion of the Constitution ? 22. Are the people of New York to-day bound by the ratifi- cation of the Constitution in 1788? 23. Did the framers of the Constitution know " a people of the United States " possessing political powers ? 24. May a State repeal its ratification of a constitutional amendment? 25. Is there any part of the United States Constitution which cannot be amended? 26. Was North Carolina in or out of the Union in 1789? SOVEREIGNTY. 27. Was the government of the United States sovereign in 1790? 28. Was the government of the United States sovereign in 1791? 29. Can the United States be compelled to pay its just debts? 30. May a State be compelled to pay debts due to the Fed- eral government? 31. Who is the sovereign in the United States? 278 CONSTITUTIONAL REPORTS [ 32. Is Congress sovereign within the sphere of national powers ? IMPLIED POWERS. 33. How far is the intent of the framers of the Constitution to be taken into account in determining its meaning ? 34. Does the "general welfare" clause give additional powers to Congress, not elsewhere stated? 35. Is the " general welfare " clause a limitation on the tax- ation clause ? 36. Can a power not distinctly implied in any specified power in the Constitution be implied from several clauses taken together? 37. May the United States government exercise a power because it was a power customary in civilized governments at the time the Constitution was framed ? 38. Are tariff acts " necessary and proper? " 39. Was the Sedition Act constitutional? 40. Was the Embargo constitutional ? 41. Was the Legal Tender Act constitutional? 42. What powers are forbidden both to the nation and the States? 43. Whence comes the authority to annex territory? i32b. Membership in the Community (see Handbook, 216, 74, 80, 87, 97, 98, 140a, 140d). CITIZENSHIP. 44. Is there a citizen of the United States who is not also a citizen of a State? 45. Can there be a citizen of a State who is not also a citi- zen of the United States ? 46. Are there now any citizens of the United States who have fewer rights than other citizens ? 132a, 132b] MEMBERSHIP IN THE COMMUNITY 279 47. Can a Chinaman become a citizen of the United States? 48. Can a Japanese become a citizen of the United States? 49. Is the son of Chinese parents, born in the United States, a citizen of the United States ? 50. Are the Filipinos citizens of the United States ? 51. What, is the legal status of a born Porto Rican who settles in New York? 52. What is the status of a born Filipino who settles in Hawaii ? 53. Will persons born in Hawaii thereby become citizens of the United States? 54. Is the son of an American citizen, born in Germany and always residing there, an American citizen ? 55. Is the son of American parents, born in Germany, a cit- izen of the United States ? 56. Can a citizen of the United States divest himself of that citizenship? 57. May Congress by statute endow Indians with citizen- ship? 58. May an Indian be compelled to accept citizenship? 59. May a State deprive any person of citizenship ? 60. May Congress by statute banish a citizen of the United States? 61. May a State banish a citizen of that State? 62. May Congress fix banishment as a penalty for crime? 63. May Congress forbid American citizens to return from foreign countries? 64. What is " inhabitancy of a State " in the meaning of the Constitution, Art. I, Sec. 3, 3? 65. Is a corporation created by a State entitled to the privi- leges and immunities of citizens in other States? 280 CONSTITUTIONAL REPORTS [ NATURALIZATION. 66. May naturalization be accomplished by State courts? 67. May Congress require naturalization by United States courts only? 68. Is naturalization a right of an alien, if he can satisfy the formalities? 69. Is a foreign power bound to accept an authentic act of naturalization, even though obtained by fraud? 70. What persons are excluded from naturalization? 71. May a Chinaman be naturalized ? 72. May Congress by statute withdraw a naturalization once granted? 73. Is there any legal distinction between a naturalized and a native-born citizen? 74. Is a naturalized citizen of the United States relieved from obligation to his native government? 75. May a Filipino Malay be naturalized as a citizen of the United States? ALIENS. 76. May a person be both a citizen of the United States and of a foreign country? 77. Are aliens liable to military service? 78. Are aliens entitled to sue in the United States courts? 79. May Congress by statute forbid aliens to hold real estate in the United States ? 80. May Congress by statute confiscate the property of aliens ? 81. May Congress by law compel subjects of friendly countries to leave our territory? 82. Was the Alien [friends] Act constitutional? 83. Was the Alien [enemies] Act constitutional? 84. May the States forbid Japanese-born persons to vote ? 132b, 132c] NATURALIZATION AND FREEDOM 281 85. How may a Chinaman legally enter the United States? 86. May Congress expel Chinese who have once been allowed to enter the country? 87. May the Chinese now in Hawaii be banished by act of Congress ? 88. May Congress refuse to sell public lands to aliens? 1320. Personal Rights (see Handbook, 216, 40, 42, 47, 51, 52, 55, 75, 82, 95, 96, 132&, 134c, 140c, 140e). PERSONAL FREEDOM. 89. Was slavery ever legal on board United States men of war? 90. Was slavery constitutionally established in Missouri before 1820? 91. Did the Proclamation of Emancipation annul slavery clauses in State constitutions? 92. Did the Proclamation of Emancipation actually free any slaves ? 93. Are slaves held by Filipinos set free by annexation ? 94. May the United States by treaty acknowledge the exis- tence of slavery in the Sulu archipelago? 95. Are the Hawaiians protected against slavery by the Federal constitution ? 96. May Congress by statute permit foreigners to carry away negroes to be sold as slaves? 97. May Congress provide by law for returning fugitive slaves who may escape into the United States from other countries? 98. Was the Fugitive Slave Act of 1850 constitutional? 99. Were the Personal Liberty Laws constitutional? 100. Had Congress at any time the right to prohibit the return of fugitive slaves from the territories ? 101. May a criminal be sold to service for a term of years? 282 CONSTITUTIONAL REPORTS [ 102. May a criminal be sold to serve an individual for life? 103. May the States refuse to permit the entrance of citizens of other States on the ground of pauperism ? 104. May mine owners in Illinois import negroes to take the places of strikers? 105. May a pauper be compelled against his will to return to the State from which he came ? 106. What is the remedy of an individual illegally arrested by the President's order? 107. May the President suspend habeas corpus? 108. May a general suspend habeas corpus in time of war? 109. May habeas corpus be suspended otherwise than by an act of Congress? FREEDOM OP SPEECH. 110. May a person be punished for speaking ill of Congress? 111. May a person be punished in time of war for telling the truth about the military situation of the country ? 112. Could a correspondent be punished for sending home truthful despatches on operations in the Philippines ? 113. Are the Filipinos entitled to meet and petition Con- gress to restore the islands to Spain? 114. Are petitioners entitled to have their petitions read in Congress? RIGHTS OF COLONISTS. 115. Are the people of Porto Rico entitled to keep and bear arms? 116. Are Filipinos entitled to "no taxation without repre- sentation ? " 117. Are Cubans entitled under the Constitution to keep and bear arms? 118. May soldiers be quartered in the houses of Filipinos? 132c] PERSONAL RIGHTS 283 119. Are Hawaiians entitled to counsel in criminal trials by the Constitution ? 120. Are Porto Ricans entitled to sue in Federal courts in California? 121. May a Porto Rican be deprived of his property without due process of law? 122. Can a Filipino be deprived of property without due process of law? 123. Is a Hawaiian entitled to indictment before trial? 124. May a Filipino be tried without an indictment or pre- sentment? 125. Have the people of a territory a right to trial by jury? 126. Are Hawaiians entitled to a trial by jury under the Constitution ? 127. Are Filipinos entitled to a trial by jury? 128. May Congress bring Porto Ricans to the continent for trial for murder? 129. Are the people of a dependency free from liability to " cruel and unusual punishments? " 130. May inhabitants of the Philippines be burned alive as a judicial punishment for crime? PROTECTION OF RIGHTS. 131. Can the United States protect a citizen against depriva- tion of his civil rights by a State? 132. May Congress protect colored citizens from exclusion by State law from juries? 133. May Congress provide for the punishment of persons who prevent negroes from voting? 134. May the United States protect a citizen against dis- crimination in the use of public conveyances? 135. May Congress require railway companies to admit negroes to Pullman cars? 284 CONSTITUTIONAL REPORTS [ 136. Was the Freedman's Bureau Bili of 1866 constitutional? 137. Can anybody deprive a citizen of the United States of his property without due process of law ? 138. May Congress divest persons of titles to lands which they have acquired by purchase from the government? 139. May private houses be searched by revenue officers at night ? i32d. The Electoral System (see Handbook, 142-1420). 140. May Congress in any way regulate the suffrage? 141. May Congress establish compulsory voting in national elections ? 142. May Congress establish a system of minority represen- tation in elections to Congress ? 143. May Congress require the Australian ballot system at national elections? 144. May Congress require the registration of voters at na- tional elections? 145. May Congress grant to women the right to vote for presidential electors? 146. May the United States in any way restrict the suffrage ? 147. Would an educational qualification fixed by a State be a reason for diminishing its representation in Congress ? 148. Is the belief that polygamy is a divine institution ground for disenfranchisement? 149. For what reasons has the United States excluded persons from the suffrage? 150. May Congress deprive deserters of their right to vote? 151. Is the right to be a candidate for elective office secured by the Constitution? 132c-l32e] ELECTORAL SYSTEM 285 1326. Status of the States (see Handbook, 21a, 21e, 34, 50, 57, 61, 143-143/). FEDERAL STATUS. 152. What rights have States which cannot be infringed by the general government? 153. May a territory form a State constitution without an enabling act? 154. Do territorial laws remain in force after the admission of the territory as a State? 155. May a Federal constitutional convention duly called pro- pose an amendment to take away the equal vote in the Senate ? 156. Was Missouri bound by the text of the Compromise of 1821? 157. May Congress fix conditions on States at admission, which will hold good after admission? 158. May Congress admit Hawaii as a State on condition that all native-born men shall always have the suffrage? 159. Can a State be formed without the consent of the people ? 160. Was the admission of West Virginia constitutional? 161. Might Congress admit Porto Rico as a State with the condition that it should have only one Senator? 162. Is Utah bound by any restrictions which do not apply to other States? 163. Is Ohio bound to perform any duties not required of other States? 164. May Congress by statute assign duties to State officials? 165. What duties do State governments perform for the na- tional government? 166. May a State Governor refuse to extradite a person whom he admits to be a fugitive criminal? 286 CONSTITUTIONAL REPORTS [ 167. Does the United States in any official way recognize the existence of cities in the States? 168. Does the United States in any way recognize the exist- ence of county governments? STATE SOVEREIGNTY. 169. Was any State sovereign in 1788? 170. Was New Hampshire ever an independent State? 171. Is a State sovereign over the inheritance of property? 172. Is a State sovereign over its own tax system? 173. Is a State sovereign over education? 174. Was North Carolina a sovereign State in 1789? INTERPOSITION AND NULLIFICATION. 175. What is the meaning of " interposition " as used in the Virginia Resolutions? 176. Is " interposition" a rightful remedy in case of actual violation of State rights by the Federal government? 177. What is the meaning of ''nullification" as used in the Kentucky Resolutions? 178. What remedy has the United States against nullifi- cation ? 179. Was nullification in 1833 " a peaceful remedy? " SECESSION. 180. Does a man owe allegiance to his State? 181. Does secession deprive a State of its status in the Union? 182. What was the legal effect of secession upon the status in the Union of the seceding States? 183. Was Tennessee in the Union during the Civil War? 184. Was the secession of Louisiana unconstitutional under the treaty of 1803? 132e] STATUS OF THE STATES 287 185. Was John Bell "bound to follow his State" in seces- sion in 1861? 186. Does the " supreme law " clause provide that a State cannot secede? 187. What are the constitutional remedies in case a State secedes? 188. Is secession insurrection? 189. Is secession rebellion? 190. Is secession treason? 191. Had Texas any more right to secede than Virginia? 192. May the United States make war upon a State? ADJUSTMENT OF CONTROVERSIES. 193. Who finally decides as to the meaning of the phrases of the State constitutions? 194. What is u a republican form of government? " 195. May Congress by statute decide which of two rival State governments is legal? 196. In case of concurrent powers between the national and State governments, which has precedence ? 197. Who decides disputes between the States and the national government? 198. Is there any tribunal to decide disputes between State Governors and the President? 199. May a suit be brought against a State by a citizen of the United States? 200. May a State be compelled to pay its debts? 201. May Congress under any circumstances declare a State statute void? 202. May Congress provide for the punishment of seditious libels on State officials? 288 CONSTITUTIONAL REPORTS [ i32f. National Legislative Department (see Hand- book, 21/t, 37, 38, 109-111, 145-1 45e). QUALIFICATION. 203. May Congress by statute refuse to receive Senators and Representatives from a State now in the Union? 204. May Congress prohibit State officers from accepting elections to the House of Representatives? 205. May Congress by statute refuse to admit Senators and Representatives elected from a former seceding State? 206. May Congress make any new qualifications for member- ship in either House ? 207. Can a State define the qualifications for a member of the House of Representatives? 208. May Congress by statute declare persons who have been engaged in war against the United States to be ineligible for membership in either House ? 209. May Congress prescribe residence in the district from which a member is elected as a qualification for membership in the House? 210. May a member elect of the House of Representatives be refused a seat because suspected of crime ? 211. May a Senator elect be excluded from the Senate on the ground that he believes in polygamy ? 212. May the Senate refuse to admit a Senator elect because it does not like him? 213. May Congress refuse to receive a member elect on grounds of personal character only? ELECTION OP SENATORS. 214. Is the clause on equality of representation in the Senate amendable except by unanimous consent? I32f] NATIONAL LEGISLATIVE 289 215. Is there a remedy if a State refuse to elect Senators? 216. May a State be compelled by constitutional amendment to choose Senators by popular vote? 217. Might a State by its constitution direct the legislature to choose as Senator a man who had a majority of the popular vote ? 218. May States require a preliminary popular election to designate candidates out of whom alone Senators may be chosen ? 219. If a legislature meets and terminates without electing a Senator, may the Governor thereupon appoint to the vacancy? 220. Could retiring Presidents constitutionally be made Sen- ators ex officio without votes ? 221. May Congress pass an act regulating contests for seats in the Senate? ELECTION OF REPRESENTATIVES. 222. How far may the United States regulate elections to Congress ? 223. May Congress in any way regulate State elections? 224. May Congress by statute place soldiers at the polls, in States where there is no disturbance of the peace? 225. May the President under the present laws station United States troops at the polls at elections? 226. May Congress prohibit the States from holding elec- tions on the day of election of members to the House ? 227. May Congress compel States to permit their public buildings to be used for Federal elections? 228. May Congress by statute district the States for con- gressional elections? 229. Is there any remedy for so districting a State that one congressional district shall have twice the population of another? 19 290 CONSTITUTIONAL REPORTS [ 230. May Congress fix the time for elections in States? 231. Are territorial delegates members of the House of Representatives ? 232. May Congress by statute refuse to admit the Repre- sentatives elected in a State? 233. May Congress commit the decision in contested elec- tions to State courts? 234. May Congress by statute empower the Federal courts to decide contested elections ? THE SENATE. 235. Does the Senate represent the States rather than the people ? 236. Is a Senator bound to regard instructions by the legis- lature of his State ? 237. Has the Vice-President of the United States any of the privileges of the Senate ? 238. Has the Vice-President of the United States a right to take part in the debates of the Senate ? 239. Is the Senate bound by parliamentary decisions of the Vice-President ? 240. What powers has the Senate which are not possessed by the House? TBE HOUSE. 241. What powers has the House which are not possessed by the Senate? 242. Has the House the sole right to initiate appropriation bills? 243. Has the Speaker of the House the right to declare a quorum present when less than a majority answer to their names in roll-call? 244. May Congress by statute assign duties to the Speaker of the House? 132f] NATIONAL LEGISLATIVE 291 245. May the Speaker of the House vote as a member and again vote in a tie on the same question? 246. May the Speaker of the House be compelled to resign? 247. Could a person not a member of the House be elected Speaker ? 248. Are members of Congress legally bound to vote, if present ? 249. Could committees of Congress be required by statute to hold their sessions in public? 250. May a member of Congress appear as paid counsel to argue for a corporation before a committee of Congress? PRIVILEGE. 251. May Congress punish any person for contempt? 252. How long does the privilege of freedom from arrest of a member of Congress last ? 253. May Congress inflict any punishment on persons not members of Congress? 254. May Congress compel the testimony of witnesses? 255. May Congress inflict the penalty of imprisonment on its own members? 256. May either House expel a member for asserting a belief in polygamy ? LEGISLATIVE PROCEDURE. 257. May Congress by statute regulate the time of adjourn- ment of future Congresses? 258. May a Congress bind a succeeding Congress? 259. May Congress delegate to a commission the prepara- tion of a bill? 260. May the Executive submit drafts of bills to Congress? 261. Is a joint resolution legally different from an act? 292 CONSTITUTIONAL REPORTS [ 262. Is there any remedy if the Journals falsely state that a bill has been passed? 263. May the order of business of either House be fixed by statute ? 264. Can a bill be carried through all its stages and become an act, all in one day? 265. Could either House of Congress by rule limit the privi- leges of debate to chairmen of committees? 266. May Congress by law determine the time of expiration of Congress? 267. Is there any legal limitation on legislative u riders "? 268. Can either House recall a bill after it is passed and sent to the other House ? 269. When does an act of Congress take effect? 270. Does a bill become an act at the moment the President affixes his signature? 271. May a President sign a bill after the adjournment of Congress ? 272. If Congress adjourn for the holidays, do bills held un- signed for ten days by the President become a law without his signature? 273. May a President veto a bill which has in principle been held valid by the Supreme Court ? RELATIONS WITH THE EXECUTIVE. 274. May either House by a committee investigate the acts of the President? 275. May the Houses by concurrent resolution require the President to submit papers? 276. May either House require the President to submit papers ? 277. May Congress under any circumstances forbid the President to exercise duties specified in the Constitution? I32f, I32g] NATIONAL EXECUTIVE 293 278. May Congress authorize the President to make regula- tions with the force of law? 279. May Congress by statute assign to the President duties not specified in the Constitution ? 280. Are Cabinet officials entitled to draft bills to be sub- mitted to Congress ? i32g. National Executive Department (see Hand- book, 21gr, 49, 60, 107, 108, 146-146d). PRESIDENTIAL ELECTIONS. 281. Are Indians eligible to the presidency? 282. Are Filipinos eligible to the presidency? 283. What is the remedy if a person under the legal age should be chosen President? 284. May Congress by statute establish qualifications for presidential electors? 285. Did the Federal Convention expect presidential electors to vote according to their individual preference ? 286. How are vacancies in the electoral colleges filled, between the popular elections and the choice of the President? 287. Would the plan of dividing the State electoral vote pro rata to the popular vote in each State be an improvement? 288. Who is constitutionally entitled to count the electoral vote? 289. Is the President of the Senate entitled to count and declare the electoral vote for President? 290. May the electoral vote of a State be rejected if there is no conflicting return? 291. Who would be President if the President and Vice- President should die between January 15 and March 4? 294 CONSTITUTIONAL REPORTS [ CABINET. 292. What is a "department" in the meaning of the Con- stitution ? 293. May Congress require the President to select Cabinet ministers out of persons already in the civil service? 294. May the President appoint an executive board of three persons, to take charge of the War Department? 295. Could Congress require the President to accept the judgment of his Cabinet? 296. Is the act of a Cabinet officer legally the act of the President ? 297. Are Cabinet officers bound to obey the directions of the President or else to resign ? 298. Could the Vice-President be made a member of the Cabinet? 299. Could Congress by statute give Cabinet officers seats in either House? 300. Could Congress assign to the Interior Department the management of foreign relations? 301. May a President prescribe the duties of a Secretary of State? 302. Has the Secretary of War any duties in which he is not subject to the direction of the President? 303. Is a Secretary of State bound to submit all his des- patches to the President? 304. Is the Secretary of War bound to obey a direction by the President? 305. May Congress require heads of departments to be re- sponsible directly to Congress ? 306. May the House of Representatives require a head of department to report directly to them ? 307. May a suit be brought against a Cabinet officer on account of an official act? 132g] NATIONAL CIVIL SERVICE 295 APPOINTMENTS AND REMOVALS. 308. Is the power of removal a part of the power of ap- pointment? 309. Is the Consular Clerks Act of 1864 constitutional? 310. May the Senate require the President to submit papers bearing on nominations ? 311. Was the Tenure of Office Act of 1867 constitutional? 312. May Congress by statute provide that the Senate shall participate in removals? 313. Has the Senate at present any control over removals? 314. May Congress by statute require the President to state reasons for a removal? 315. May Congress by statute require heads of departments to state reasons for removals ? 316. May the Senate require papers relative to removals, before confirming appointments to fill the vacancies thus caused ? 317. May Congress by statute limit the term of public officials ? 318. May Congress by statute require that appointments shall be made only from persons who have passed a civil ser- vice examination? 319. May Congress give to graduates of agricultural colleges a preference in appointments to office ? 320. May Congress provide a civil service examination for ambassadors ? 321. May Congress make the civil service rules mandatory on the President? 322. May Congress require that appointments to office be apportioned per capita among the States and territories ? 323. May Congress by statute give to officials a term during good behavior? 296 CONSTITUTIONAL REPORTS [ 324. May Congress in creating an office designate the person who is to fill it? 325. May Congress designate persons to be promoted in the military service? 326. May Congress by statute remove officials by shortening the term of their offices ? 327. May a naval officer be dismissed without a court martial ? 328. May an officer of the army be dismissed without a hearing ? CIVIL SERVICE. 329. May the President appoint foreign representatives for whose salary Congress has made no provision? 330. May the President appoint persons without salary to offices not created by Congress ? 331. May the President accept private subscriptions for pay- ment of an official whose salary Congress refuses to vote? 332. May Congress designate persons to occupy public offices already created? 333. May Congress provide pensions for civil employees? 334. May States tax the salaries of United States officials? 335. May Congress impose any official duties it pleases on officers of the government other than the President? 336. Have executive regulations for government employees the force of law? 337. May an official of the United States at the same time hold office under a State or territory? 338. May the President delegate his power of appointment to subordinates? 339. May the President delegate his command over the army? 132g] EXECUTIVE RESPONSIBILITY 297 RESPONSIBILITY OF THE PRESIDENT. 340. Is the Presidential veto a legislative power? 341. Is a President bound to carry out a statute passed over a veto based on unconstitutionally ? 342. Is the President bound by an act (or joint resolution) passed over his veto? 343. May a President refuse to carry out an act of Congress on the ground that it is unconstitutional? 344. May the President constitutionally perform an act which the Supreme Court has held to be unconstitutional? 345. Was President Johnson bound to carry out the recon- struction acts which he vetoed? 346. May either House require from the President the reasons for an official action ? 347. What is the remedy if the President commit an unlaw- ful act? 348. May a suit be brought against the President in office on account of an official act? 349. May a suit be brought against an ex-President for an official act performed while President? 350. May the Senate censure the President? 351. May a President be impeached for incompetency ? 352. Can Congress prescribe the districts over which speci- fied generals are to be put in command? 353. May the President be summoned as a witness? 354. Can the President pardon a man before indictment? 355. Is there any limitation on the President's power of pardon ? 356. May Congress by law relieve from penalties already incurred ? 357. May the President pardon offences against State laws? 298 CONSTITUTIONAL REPORTS [ i32h. National Judiciary (see Handbook, 2K, 43, 44, 112, 113, 147-147d). APPOINTMENT AND REMOVAL OF JUDGES. 358. May Congress create a judgeship with a limited term? 359. Are territorial judges "judges of inferior courts" in the constitutional sense? 360. May Congress constitutionally abolish a judgeship without pensioning the incumbent? 361. May Congress get rid of judges by repealing the laws creating the courts to which they are attached? 362. For what offences may a United States judge be im- peached ? 363. May a United States judge be impeached for making an unpopular decision? PROCEDURE OF COURTS. 364. May the Senate require the chief justice to give him an opinion on the constitutionality of a pending bill? 365. May the President require the opinion of the Supreme Court on a pending treaty ? 366. May Congress require the justices of the Supreme Court to act as examiners into claims on the government? 367. May Congress exclude particular kinds of cases from the decision of the Supreme Court? 368. Had the Congress of the Confederation supreme juris- diction in prize cases? 369. Have the United States courts criminal jurisdiction at common law? 370. May Congress by statute take away the jurisdiction of courts over pending cases? 371. In what cases is the decision of the new Circuit Courts of Appeals final ? 132h] NATIONAL JUDICIARY 299 372. In what civil cases is a jury required in United States courts ? 373. Are judges bound by the intent of the framers of the Constitution ? 374. Are naval cadets subject to the ordinary civil courts for offences committed within the academy? 375. May a United States court enjoin a person not to do an act defined by statute as criminal ? 376. May courts punish as a contempt acts criminal under statute law? 377. What is the effect of a decision of the Supreme Court upon persons not parties to the suit? 378. Is an individual not a party to a suit before the Su- preme Court punishable for ignoring the decision? 379. Is a United States court bound by French law in cases where the maker of the will dies in Paris? 380. Is a State court bound to accept the decision of a court in another State in the same case ? 381. Is a State court bound to accept the finding of the court of another State as to the validity of a will ? .RELATIONS TO STATES. 382. In cases of concurrent jurisdiction between State and national courts, which has the precedence? 383. Can cases arising under Federal laws be tried in State courts ? 384. Can cases arising under State laws be tried in Federal courts ? 385. May State courts issue writs of habeas corpus against United States officials? 386. May a State court grant habeas corpus in favor of a person confined for contempt of a Federal court? 300 CONSTITUTIONAL REPORTS [ 387. May the United States courts issue writs of habeas corpus against State officials? 388. May the New Jersey courts declare a national law un- constitutional ? 389. Is the Supreme Court bound by the decisions of State Supreme Courts on points of State constitutional law? 390. How may cases be "removed" from a State to a United States court? (Does not refer to appeals or acts of error. ) 391. How may cases be brought up from State to United States courts by "writ of error"? 392. When and how may cases technically be "appealed" from State courts to Federal courts ? 393. Are the decisions of the Commissioner of Pensions binding on the State courts? 394. May a Federal court mandamus a Governor of a State? 395. May United States courts compel a State official to perform his State duties? 396. May the United States courts compel city officials to perform their municipal duties? 397. May a citizen of a territory sue a citizen of a State in a territorial court? RELATIONS TO EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT. 398. May the Supreme Court render opinions at the request of any executive official? 399. Who decides disputes between executive officials? 400. Is a decision of the Supreme Court binding on the President? 401. May an executive official be required by a court to perform an act forbidden by the President? 402. May a United States court mandamus the Secretary of the Treasury? I32h] NATIONAL JUDICIARY 301 403. May a United States court direct an officer of the army not to arrest civilians ? 404. May a United States court direct a letter carrier to deliver mail prohibited by act of Congress? CONTROL OF COURTS. 405. Is the Supreme Court bound by its own previous decisions ? 406. Is there a remedy for an unconstitutional decision of the Supreme Court? 407. Can a judge be sued for any official act? 408. How are judgments of the Supreme Court carried out? 409. Is a decision of the Supreme Court binding on Congress ? 410. Can Congress by law remit judicial penalties incurred in specific cases? STATES AS PARTIES TO SUITS. 411. Is the Supreme Court the arbiter in all cases between States and the United States? 412. May a State be summoned to appear as defendant in a suit before a Federal court ? 413. May a suit against a State be appealed to the Supreme Court from a State court? 414. May a State which has made coupons on its bonds re- ceivable for taxes be compelled to receive such coupons ? IMPEACHMENT. 415. Does resignation remove an official from liability to impeachment? 416. Is impeachment a judicial process? 417. May a President be impeached for drunkenness? 418. Can Senators of the United States be impeached? 302 CONSTITUTIONAL REPORTS [ DECLARING ACTS VOID. 419. May United States courts declare a joint resolution of Congress void ? 420. May the Supreme Court declare an income tax void ? 421. May the Supreme Court declare a tariff act void? 422. May the Supreme Court declare an entry in the Senate Journal void? 423. May the Supreme Court declare void the order of a general in the field in time of war? 424. May United States courts declare an executive proc- lamation .void? 425. May a State constitution be held void, as conflicting with the Federal constitution? 426. May the Supreme Court of the United States declare a city ordinance void? 132!. Territorial Functions (see Handbook, 2 1/, 42, 54, 55, 63-65, 69, 71, 75, 77 ; 82, 90, 91, 97, 114, 115, 148-1482). ANNEXATION. 427. Is the intention of the framers of the Constitution as to annexation of territory binding upon this generation? 428. Was the annexation of Louisiana constitutional? 429. Was the consent of the people of the Philippines neces- sary for the constitutional transfer of the islands to the United States? 430. May the President order the occupation of a region prior to the signing of the treaty of peace by which it is ceded ? 431. May Congress annex Cuba by joint resolution, con- trary to the express desire of the Cubans? 432. May Congress annex the island of St. Thomas without the consent of the people of the island ? 433. May Congress by statute annex territory without the consent of the people thereof ? 132h, 132i] ANNEXATION AND BOUNDARIES 303 434. May Alaska be transferred to China by treaty? 435. Has the United States constitutional authority to plant a colony in unoccupied territory in Africa? 436. May the President contract for the purchase of the Danish West Indies? 437. Did the previous laws of Porto Rico remain in force after the ratification of the treaty of cession ? BOUNDARIES. 438. Might Congress include Canada within our customs boundary, while leaving it outside the political boundary ? 439. Who decides what are the exterior boundaries of the United States? 440. May Congress fix the boundaries between States ? 441. Would a State be bound to obey an act of Congress dividing its territory? 442. May Congress determine the boundary between an old State and one just admitted? 443. May Congress by statute declare that Tierra del Fuego is a part of the United States? MARITIME JURISDICTION. 444. Has the United States any jurisdiction outside of the three-mile limit and the decks of her vessels ? 445. What is the jurisdiction of the United States over en- closed bays like Chesapeake and Long Island Sound ? 446. Has the United States any jurisdiction in Bering Sea? 447. In what jurisdiction are the Great Lakes? 448. Who owns the bottom of the sea between high and low water-mark ? 449. Who owns the bottom of the sea between low water- mark and the three-mile limit? 304 CONSTITUTIONAL REPORTS [ 450. May the United States forbid Americans to fish on the Newfoundland banks? 451. May Congress regulate in-shore fisheries on our coasts? 452. Who has jurisdiction over the malicious cutting of a telegraph cable in mid ocean ? 453. Is the wreck of a ship of war subject to United States jurisdiction ? 454. What is the tribunal for offences by civilians on board foreign ships of war in American ports ? 455. What is the tribunal for offences committed on board foreign merchant vessels in American ports ? 456. What is the tribunal for offences committed on board American merchant vessels on the high sea ? 457. What is the tribunal for offences committed by civilians on American ships of war? SEAT OF GOVERNMENT. 458. Have the people of the District of Columbia a right to trial by jury? 459. May Congress withdraw the privilege of habeas corpus from the people of the District of Columbia in time of peace? 460. May Congress erect the District of Columbia into a territory ? 461. Is a divorce granted in the District of Columbia valid in Massachusetts? 462. May Congress prohibit in the District of Columbia the sale of sweat shop goods made in a State ? 463. May Congress prohibit persons coming from Maryland to the District of Columbia? 464. May an insurance company chartered in the District of Columbia claim a right to do business in Massachusetts? 465. Are the authorities of the District of Columbia bound to extradite a criminal who has fled from Maryland ? 132i] SPECIAL JURISDICTIONS 305 POSTS AND PUBLIC BUILDINGS. 466. May the United States by eminent domain acquire land in a State for a national park? 467. What is the tribunal for offences committed in United States military posts? 468. What is the tribunal for offences committed in United States public buildings? 469. May Congress construct a public building in a State contrary to the will of that State ? 470. May Congress take private lands to be made into forest reserves ? 471. May States repeal acts granting exclusive jurisdiction to the United States over forts? 472. May Congress expropriate State property for fortifi- cations ? 473. Who has jurisdiction over a murder committed in a United States custom house? 474. May Massachusetts repeal the act ceding jurisdiction over Castle Island to the United States? 475. May States tax buildings rented by the United States? PUBLIC LANDS. 476. Are there any limitations on the right of the United States to dispose of public lands ? 477. May Congress recall a land grant once made? 478. May Congress give land to aliens? 479. May the United States lease public lands for a term of years ? 480. May States tax the public lands within their limits? 481. May the United States grant the right to cut timber on government lands for private purposes ? 482. May Congress annul land grants made in the Philip- pines by previous Spanish authority? 20 306 CONSTITUTIONAL REPORTS [ 483. May the United States lease ungranted lands in the Philippines in perpetuity? 484. May Congress grant lands for purposes for which it could not grant money ? 485. May the States tax municipal public lands? 486. May the States tax railroad land grants? INDIANS. 487. May Congress grant Indian lands to white men without the consent of the Indians? 488. Have the Indians a legal right to the lands which they occupy ? 489. Have Indians any rights which Congress is bound to respect? 490. May Congress constitutionally appropriate money for the support of Indians ? 491. In what manner may an Indian become a citizen? 492. Can a crime committed by an Indian on an Indian on his reservation be punished by a United States court? 493. May Indians be removed from their reservations with- out their consent? 494. May Congress by statute compel Indians to send their children to school? 495. May a tribal Indian sue m a United States court? 496. May a tribal Indian be tried for murder in a United States court? 497. May an Indian tribe sue another Indian tribe in the United States courts? 498. May an Indian tribe sue a State? TERRITORIAL GOVERNMENT. 499. Is the Governor of Porto Rico an " officer of the United States " in the constitutional sense ? 1321] DEPENDENCIES 307 500. May Congress define the duties of a Governor of a territory ? 501. Can territoral officials be officers of the United States? 502. May territorial judges be removed? 503. May an officer of the army be appointed Governor of a territory ? GOVERNMENT OF DEPENDENCIES. 504. Does the Constitution ipso facto extend to the ter- ritories ? 505. Are the people of conquered territory entitled to priv- ileges secured under the Constitution? 506. May the President establish a military government in conquered territory previous to cession ? 507. May the President establish a military government in annexed territory previous to action by Congress? 508. May the President establish a civil government in con- quered territory previous to cession? 509. May the President establish a civil government in an- nexed territory previous to legislation by Congress ? 510. May Congress authorize the President to establish a ter- ritorial government according to his discretion? 511. May Congress relegate an organized territory to the unorganized status? 512. Has the United States constitutional power to plant colonies? 513. May Congress establish a permanent government in the Philippines, in which there shall be no trial by jury? 514. May Congress create a territorial government for Porto Rico in which the governor shall have power to make laws? 515. May the President provide a permanent civil govern- ment for the Philippines ? 516. May Congress create a permanent military government for Porto Rico ? 308 CONSTITUTIONAL REPORTS [ 517. May Congress by statute establish a military govern- ment in the Philippines? 518. May Congress pass an export tax law applying to the Philippines ? 519. May Congress grant rights of self-government to a territory equivalent to those enjoyed by a State ? 520. May Congress establish a territorial government- in which the legislature shall be appointed? 521. May the United States place the Philippine Islands under the jurisdiction of the Indian Commissioners? STATUS OF DEPENDENCIES. 522. Is the Constitution the "supreme law of the land" in Hawaii? 523. May Congress establish a government lottery in Porto Rico? 524. Had Congress power to prohibit slavery in the whole Louisiana cession? 525. May Congress annul the charter of a corporation granted by a territorial legislature? 526. May Congress constitutionally confiscate the property of a corporation in a territory ? 527. May Congress make sanitary regulations for the lepers in Hawaii? 528. May Congress establish a government monopoly of sell- ing tobacco in the Philippines? 529. May Congress by statute compel the Porto Ricaus to send their children to school? 530. May Congress forbid cock-fighting in Porto Rico? 531. May Congress prohibit the sale of liquor in a territory? 532. May Congress charter a special bank to operate in Porto Rico? 132i] DEPENDENCIES 309 TRADE OF DEPENDENCIES. 533. May the commanding general establish a special tariff for conquered territory previous to cession ? 534. May the commanding general establish a special tariff in conquered territory after cession ? 535. Does an annexed territory forthwith come under the general revenue laws? 536. May Congress establish a special tariff for the Philippines? 537. May Congress make a separate tariff for Alaska? 538. May Congress leave the Philippines outside our customs boundary ? 539. May Congress put Porto Rico outside the customs boundary of the United States? 540. May States tax goods imported from Porto Rico? 541. May duties be laid on imports from the Philippines? 542. May Congress make a separate tariff for Alaska? 543. May Congress prohibit the people of Hawaii from trad- ing with foreign countries? 544. May Congress prohibit trade between the Philippines and foreign nations? 545. May foreign vessels carry goods from New York to Porto Rico ? 546. May Congress prohibit commerce from Porto Rico to the Philippines? 547. May Congress prohibit foreigners from emigrating to the Philippines while allowing it to the United States? 548. May a State refuse to admit goods imported from Porto Rico? 549. May Congress lay a special license tax on merchants doing business in Manila? 310 CONSTITUTIONAL REPORTS [| TAXATION IN DEPENDENCIES. 550. May Congress lay a special tax on property in the territories? 551. May the real estate in territories be taxed by a national statute ? 552. May Congress lay taxes in the States expressly to sup- port the government of the Philippines ? 553. May Congress tax the Hawaiians for the support of the national government? 554. May Congress lay a special tax on the people of Samoa ? 555. May Congress lay a poll tax on the Filipinos ? 132]. Financial Questions (see Handbook, 21&, 39, 116, 117, 149-149d). FINANCIAL SYSTEM. 556. May Congress appropriate money for the bureaux in the Navy Department for more than two years? 557. May Congress appropriate money for navy yards five years in advance? 558. May the United States be compelled to carry out a five- year contract for supplying bread to the navy? 559. Does unclaimed salary revert to the Treasury? 560. May the United States lend its cash balances on interest ? 561. Can an accounting officer of the United States be com- pelled by a court to sign a warrant for the payment of money? 562. How are claims against the United States collectable? 563. May Congress recall an appropriation for the relief of individuals, before it is paid over ? 564. Can the United States be compelled to pay the interest on its debts ? 132i, 132J] FINANCIAL QUESTIONS 311 565. Are there any limitations on the borrowing power of the United States? 566. May Congress lower the rate of interest on government bonds before their maturity? 567. May the United States in any way be compelled to pay just debts ? 568. May Congress vote money to sustain the credit of the New York Clearing House Association in times of panic ? RELATION WITH STATES. 569. May the United States seize State property for national purposes ? 570. Has a State constitutional power to forbid the collection within its limits of an unconstitutional tax? 571. May States tax corporations created by the United States? 572. May Congress return to the States money once collected from them in taxes? 573. May a State tax the incomes of United States officials? 574. May the States tax the income derived from govern- ment securities? 575. If both the United States and a State tax the same property, which comes in first? 576. May Congress distribute surplus revenue among the States? 577. Was the Distribution Act of 1837 constitutional? 578. Could the United States constitutionally assume the present State debts? 579. May Congress tax the property of cities? 580. May States pass acts punishing counterfeiting of United States securities? 581. Is an inspection duty on meats for export an kt export duty?" 312 CONSTITUTIONAL REPORTS [ 582. May the United States appropriate money for the sup- port of State lunatic asylums ? 583. May Congress lay taxes in order to produce a surplus revenue to be distributed among the States ? PRINCIPLES OF TAXATION. 584. Is there any limit on the purpose of taxation by the United States? 585. Has the United States any exclusive power of taxation? 586. May Congress lay a tax on imports in order to raise money for subsidies to American vessels? 587. May Congress levy a special tax on laborers to support a Department of Labor? 588. May Congress tax individual balances on deposit in banks ? 589. May Congress tax liquor dealers in States in which the sale of liquor is forbidden? 590. May the United States tax oleomargarine on the ground that it is unhealthful? 591. May the United States lay a tax on oleomargarine in order to protect the producers of butter? 592. May Congress lay a tax on oleomargarine equal to its usual selling price? 593. May Congress grant a bounty to producers of sweet potatoes ? 594. May Congress grant a bounty for the importation of tea? 595. Is a bounty to producers of maple sugar constitutional? 596. Was the sugar bounty constitutional? INCOME AND LEGACY TAXES. 597. Is an income tax a direct tax? 598. May the United States lay a special tax on an income derived from foreign investment? 132j] TAXES 313 599. May the United States tax the incomes of State officials ? 600. May a State levy an income tax including salaries of United States officials? 601. May Congress lay a tax on the salaries of United States officials ? 602. May Congress lay a tax on incomes, not proportioned to representation in Congress? 603. Was the income tax of 1894 constitutional? 604. May Congress lay a graduated income tax? 605. May Congress establish a graduated income tax the gross amount to be divided among the States in proportion to their population? 606. May the United States lay a tax on the incomes of institutions of learning, exempt by State law? 607. May Congress tax incomes derived from land? 608. May Congress lay a tax on the income of colleges? 609. Is a national income tax, graduated up to 100% on the largest incomes, constitutional? 610. May the United States tax legacies? 611. May the United States lay a graduated tax on legacies? 612. May the United States tax legacies to institutions which by State law are exempt from taxation? 613. May the United States tax legacies to States? TARIFF. 614. May the United States forbid the importation of goods? 615. May Congress exact a tariff for the sole purpose of protecting American industry? 616. May Congress lay an import duty so high as to be pro- hibitory ? 617. May Congress make duties on imports from one country less than those on similar imports from another country? 314 CONSTITUTIONAL REPORTS [ 618. May Congress grant to individuals the privilege of im- porting goods free on which others pay duties ? 619. May Congress prohibit the importation of innocuous goods ? 620. May Congress forbid the importation of coffee? 621. Are passengers entitled to bring in their personal baggage free of duty? 622. May Congress permit naval officers to import goods for their own use free of duty? 623. Do American ambassadors have the right to bring goods into the United States duty free? 624. May Congress admit goods free of duty in American bottoms while charging duty on importations in foreign bottoms ? 625. May Congress lay a tariff proportionately lower on large quantities than on smaller quantities of the same com- modity ? 626. May Congress lay higher duties on importation in foreign vessels than on those in American vessels? 627. May Congress grant to American merchants a lower rate of duty than is paid by alien merchants? 628. May Congress remit duties on goods intended for a World's Fair? 629. May Congress pass acts altering the duties on goods already imported and in bond? 630. Can foreign built yachts, the property of American citizens, be imported without the payment of duty ? 631. May Congress lay duties on materials for State public buildings ? 632. May a tariff act be passed laying additional duties on goods imported before the date of the act? 633. May Congress give the President power to withdraw duties on imports? 634. May a State tax imported goods? 132J] TARIFF 315 635. Is there a remedy if the collector assess an illegal rate of duty on imports? 636. May the United States seize imported goods on pay- ment of the declared value? 637. May Congress require importers to declare the cost of manufacture of their goods ? 638. May goods once imported and duty paid be seized for undervaluation ? 639. What is the legal force of " treasury regulations " on the tariff? 640. Who decides whether the classification of goods for duty by a collector is correct? 641. What is the remedy if the assessors classify imported goods in a manner not contemplated by the tariff act? 642. Are import duties a lien on the goods on which they are assessed? 643. May a tariff be altered by a treaty? 644. May Congress require the payment of duties in gold? 645. May Congress require the payment of import duties in a form of currency not required for other taxes ? 646. What is the remedy if a United States official refuses to receive silver dollars in payment of duty? COINAGE AND CURRENCY. 647. May the United States make its notes legal tender to individuals, but not legal tender to the government? 648. May Congress make platinum coins legal tender? 649. May Congress make the notes of national banks legal tender? 650. May Congress make its bonds legal tender at par and accrued interest? 651. May Congress issue legal tender notes for the retire- ment of interest-bearing bonds? 316 CONSTITUTIONAL REPORTS [ 652. May Congress make interest-bearing notes legal tender for face and accrued interest? 653. May Congress declare one hundred grains to be the weight of a ten-dollar gold piece ? 654. May Congress make payable in silver contracts specifi- cally calling for gold ? 655. May Congress make silver legal tender, but except payments for pensions and to laborers? 656. Is the United States bound to redeem at full value coins reduced by ordinary abrasion? 657. May Congress increase the legal weight of the silver dollar, and then refuse to receive the old dollars at their face value ? 658. May Congress provide for lending legal tender notes on real estate security? 659. May the United States make silver certificates legal tender ? 660. May the United States make its own notes legal tender in times of peace? 661. May Congress make silver bullion at its weight legal tender in payment of debts? 662. Could Congress constitutionally create an artificial standard of values based on average prices of staple com- modities ? BANKS. 663. Had the Confederation constitutional authority to charter the Bank of North America? 664. Could the United States create a bank in which it was the sole stockholder? 665. Were the bills of the first United States Bank bills of credit? 666. Was the first United States Bank constitutional? 132j] CURRENCY AND BANKS 317 667. Was the second United States Bank constitutional? 668. Can the United States be compelled to redeem national bank notes ? 669. Does the United States guarantee the national bank notes ? 670. Could the United States make national bank notes legal tender? 671. May Congress authorize banks of issue having no other security for notes than their own resources ? 672. May Congress charter a bank with authority to do business outside the United States ? 673. May Congress charter a bank which is to render no service to the government? 674. May the United States give to national banks exclusive privileges of government deposits? 675. May Congress establish a system of national banks which shall have a monopoly of the banking business ? 676. May Congress authorize banks to issue silver dollars? 677. May a State create a bank of issue in which it is the sole stockholder? 678. Could Congress prohibit the chartering of banks by States? 679. May Congress prohibit banks organized under State charters ? 680. May a State tar a national bank ? 681. May States tax national bank stock? 682. May Congress prohibit the circulation of other than national bank notes? 683. May the United States prohibit State banks from issu- ing notes? 684. Is the tax on State bank notes constitutional? 685. May Congress prohibit State banks from discounting commercial paper? 318 CONSTITUTIONAL REPORTS [ i32k. Commercial Questions (see Handbook, 217, 43-45, 92, 118, 119, 150-1500- RELATIONS OF STATES. 686. May a State prohibit the importation of any foreign commodity ? 687. May a State forbid the sale of goods imported from a foreign country? 688. May the States levy duties on vessels engaged in foreign commerce? 689. May States regulate interstate commerce? 690. May a State tax transportation corporations, chartered by the United States ? 691. May a State direct through interstate trains to stop at specified stations? 692. May a State regulate the conditions of the passenger traffic to foreign countries? DEGREE OF REGULATION. 693. May Congress prohibit the importation of salt? 694. May Congress prohibit all exportation of goods? 695. May Congress assume a government monopoly of foreign trade ? 696. Is the slave trade piracy? 697. May Congress in time of peace forbid American vessels to leave port? 698. Could the United States lay an embargo on shipping in specified ports while allowing trade from other ports? 699. May Congress in time of peace exclude the merchant vessels of a particular nation from United States ports ? 700. May the United States blockade its own ports ? 701. May Congress prohibit the importation of liquors? 132k] REGULATION AND IMMIGRATION 319 702. May Congress regulate rates of freight to and from foreign countries? 703. May the United States regulate commerce carried on wholly within the limits of a State? 704. May Congress prohibit commerce from State to State? IMMIGRATION. 705. May the United States prohibit immigration at specified ports ? 706. May Congress forbid immigration from specified countries ? 707. May Congress prohibit the immigration of persons of a particular race ? 708. May Congress exclude immigrants on the ground that they are subjects of Russia? 709. May Congress fix a property qualification for immi- grants ? 710. May Congress prohibit the immigration of persons not able to read and write? 711. May Congress by statute limit to a fixed number the immigrants to be annually admitted? 712. May Congress forbid the immigration of Hawaiians into California? 713. May Congress prohibit the immigration of Filipinos? 714. Do the Chinese immigration laws apply to the Philip- pines ? 715. May Congress prohibit the emigration of American citizens ? 716. May Congress forbid per; on s to emigrate from the States to the Philippines ? 717. Have the States any power to prohibit people from leaving the State? 320 CONSTITUTIONAL REPORTS [ 718. May any State prohibit the immigration of foreigners within its limits from other States? 719. Have the States any power to prevent immigrants from landing at a seaport? 720. May a State pass an act similar to the Contract Labor Act? 721. May a State prohibit convicts from coming in from abroad ? 722. May a State prohibit the immigration of persons un- able to care for themselves? ENCOURAGEMENT OF SHIPPING. 723. May Congress grant a bounty of ten dollars per ton dis- placement for the construction of private merchant steamers? 724. Is a national bounty to fishermen constitutional? 725. May Congress constitutionally pay a subsidy to a steamship line except for carrying the mails? 726. May Congress pay a bounty on the construction of ships for foreign trade ? 727. May Congress pay a bounty per ton of goods carried to a foreign country by an American ship? 728. May Congress pay a bounty to foreign ships for keep- ing up a service from San Francisco to the Philippines? 729. May Congress pay a bounty to American lines for keep- ing up a service from New York to Hawaii ? EXTERNAL NAVIGATION. 730. May Congress regulate the sanitary condition of for- eign vessels leaving United States ports ? 731. May Congress compel foreign ships to provide suitable facilities for steerage passengers ? 732. May Congress regulate commerce through health laws? 132k] NAVIGATION 321 733. May Congress tax vessels to keep up a life-saving service ? 734. May Congress give American built ships a monopoly of importing goods ? 735. May Congress deprive an American ship of its registry as a penalty for smuggling ? 736. May Congress give to foreign owned vessels the privi- lege of American registry ? 737. Could the United States constitutionally prohibit the carrying of freight in steamers ? 738. May Congress provide that freight shall be exported only by regular lines of steamers, not by " tramps?" 739. May Congress tax vessels for the support of a weather bureau ? 740. Could the United States establish mid-ocean stations for information and aid to vessels? 741. Could the United States require that pilots submit to a civil service examination? 742. May Congress grant to Spanish vessels privileges in Philippine ports not conferred on the ships of other powers ? INTERNAL NAVIGATION. 743. May Congress by law designate rivers as navigable? 744. May the United States open a new channel for sea- going vessels without the consent of the State in which the channel lies? 745. May the United States close a navigable river? 746. May Congress appropriate public money to protect private property from the wash of rivers? 747. May the Secretary of War authorize the turning of Lake Michigan water through the Calumet Canal? 748. May Congress construct irrigating canals within the boundaries of States? 21 322 CONSTITUTIONAL REPORTS [ 749. Can Congress regulate navigation wholly within the boundary of a State? 750. May Congress authorize the obstruction of a navigable river by a permanent low bridge? 751. May Congress improve the navigation of a river wholly within a State against the will of the State ? 752. May Congress prohibit navigation on a navigable river? 753. May Congress construct a canal outside United States territory ? 754. Was the Bonus Bill of 1816 constitutional? 755. May Congress authorize the construction of drawless bridges over the Charles River? RAILROADS. 756. May the United States construct and operate railroads? 757. May Congress construct a railroad which lies wholly within one State? 758. May the United States construct railroads to be leased to corporations? 759. May Congress provide by law for the purchase of a railroad for public use without the consent of the owners ? 760. May Congress charter railroads without the consent of the States through which they run ? 761. May Congress constitutionally prohibit pooling of rail- way earnings? 762. May Congress prohibit the consolidation of steamship companies? 763. May Congress regulate the wages of employees of rail- roads engaged in interstate commerce ? 764. May the United States construct roads in a State with- out the consent of the State ? 765. May Congress by statute fix maximum rates for over- land transportation ? 132k] RAILROADS 323 766. May Congress fix interstate rates on land-grant rail- roads ? 767. How far may Congress regulate the administration of railroads? (Question of rates excluded.) 768. May Congress require railroads chartered by States to make returns to a national commission? 769. Can the Interstate Commerce Commission compel tes- timony ? 770. May Congress by statute compel railroad managers to answer the questions put by a non-judicial commission? 771. May Congress grant money subsidies to railroads chartered by a State? 772. May Congress prohibit the consolidation of railroads? 773. May Congress provide for the examination for color blindness of engineers on railroads? 774. May Congress regulate the rate of speed of trains while passing through cities? 775. May Congress regulate the management of sleeping cars ? 776. May Congress fix parlor-car rates of excess fare? 777. May Congress prohibit the carrying of explosives on railroads ? 778. May Congress tax the rolling-stock of railroads? 779. May Congress pass a general law regulating trolley lines? TRANSMISSION OF INTELLIGENCE. 780. Can the United States oblige anybody to carry mail? 781. Could Congress provide for carrying mails free of postage ? 782. May the United States refuse to deliver letters to the persons addressed? 783. Could Congress constitutionally have prohibited the carrying of abolition publications in the mails? 324 CONSTITUTIONAL REPORTS [ 784. May Congress forbid the delivery of mail addressed to presumably innocent persons? 785. May Congress by statute direct postmasters to deliver only such mail as is authorized by State statute ? 786. May the United States provide for the opening of letters in transit through the mails? 787. May States establish monopolies of express business^ within their own limits? 788. May Congress forbid express companies to carry packages weighing less than four pounds? 789. May Congress forbid express companies to carry small packages to Porto Rico? 790. May the United States set up a single telegraph com- bination and give it a monopoly of the business? 791. Can Congress provide by law for purchasing existing telegraph lines, without the consent of the owners ? 792. May Congress make the telegraph business a govern- ment monopoly? 793. May Congress fix the rates for telegrams? 794. May Congress compel a telegraph company to* furnish copies of telegrams to an investigating committee? 795. May Congress take over and operate the telephone system on public account? 796. May a State in any way tax a telegraph or express company doing interstate business? 797. Could the United States constitutionally construct a submarine cable to Europe? 798. May a State compel telegraph companies to furnish copies of telegrams as evidence in law suits? CORPORATIONS AND TRUSTS. 799. May Congress prohibit the organization of corporations whose purpose is to monopolize some branch of trade ? 132k] POST OFFICE AND TRUSTS 325 800. May Congress annul the charter of a corporation, created by it without reservation of the right to annul? 801. May Congress repeal the charter of a corporation which it has created? 802. Is the present national anti-trust law constitutional? 803. May Congress constitutionally prohibit trusts ? 804. May Congress by statute forbid the formation of a pottery trust? 805. May Congress make the formation of a trust a criminal offence ? 806. May Congress require trusts to take out a Federal license as a condition of doing business ? 807. May Congress forbid manufacturers to combine in in- corporated organizations ? 808. May Congress require trusts to publish detailed financial statements ? 809. May Congress provide that no tariff duties shall be collected on goods in which there is competition by trusts ? SPECIAL COMMERCIAL POWERS. 810. May Congress regulate fire insurance? 811. May Congress regulate life insurance? 812. May Congress pass usury laws? 813. May Congress provide for the granting of trade-marks? 814. May Congress by statute provide that the government may use all inventions hereafter patented without payment to the inventors? 815. May Congress grant to foreigners copyright privileges not enjoyed by citizens ? 816. May Congress require all seekers for copyright to give the government the right to reprint without payment for tbue convenience of government officers ? 817. May Congress grant perpetual copyrights? 326 CONSTITUTIONAL REPORTS [ 818. May Congress authorize copyright on musical sounds* (*. e., give exclusive right to melodies or compositions)? 819. May Congress pass a retroactive bankruptcy act? 820. May Congress lay taxes on arid districts for the con- struction of irrigating canals? 821. May Congress constitutionally construct a system of irrigating canals? 822. May States pass bankruptcy acts affecting creditors outside the State? 823. May Congress fix penalties for fraudulent bankruptcies applying to bankruptcies declared previous to the act? 824. Could the United States take upon itself the monopoly of manufacturing whisky? 825. Would a prohibition of the manufacture of oleomar- garine be constitutional? 826. May Congress compel merchants to exhibit their books to census enumerators? 827. May Congress by statute compel people to answer the questions of census takers as to their age? 828. Can Congress by statute compel people to answer interrogations of census enumerators as to former commission of crimes? 132!. War Powers (see Handbook, 19j, 21m, 60, 121, 152-152/). DECLARATION OF WAR. 829. Can a President make war without a declaration of war? 830. May Congress by joint resolution direct the President to oppose by force the action of a foreign power? 831. May the President in time of pence send troops out- side the borders of the United States? 832. May the President authorize a ship of war to capture a foreign merchant ship in time of peace? 132k, 1321] WAR POWERS 327 833. May a United States naval vessel capture a foreign merchant ship in time of war, if bound to a foreign port? MILITIA. 834. Are the States bound to furnish militia when called upon? 835. Has a State a right to raise troops in time of war? 836. Are militia in the service of the United States in any way subject to the authority of their Governor? 837. May a President call out militia to invade a neighbor- ing country? 838. May a State refuse to allow the militia of another State to enter its borders ? 839. Are volunteers militia ? 840. Are militia subject to the Articles of War? 841. May a militiaman resign while on actual service? COMMAND. 842. Are there any restrictions on the President's powers as Commander-in-Chief ? 843. May the President delegate his power of commander- in-chief ? 844. May Congress vest the command of the army in any other person than the President? 845. Are West Point cadets officers of the United States? 846. Has a Naval cadet a right to an appointment in the navy ? 847. May Congress by statute limit all appointments above second lieutenant to persons promoted from grade to grade ? 848. Is a military officer bound to obey any order of the President? 328 CONSTITUTIONAL REPORTS [ MARTIAL LAW. 849. May martial law be declared in parts of the country where there is no war? 850. May Congress release soldiers from the jurisdiction of State courts in cases of alleged murder? 851. May a civilian be court martialed? 852. What is the tribunal for a murder committed by a soldier in time of war? 853. Could Congress by statute compel Indians to perform military service? 854. What is the tribunal for a murder committed by a soldier in the streets of New York in time of peace? 855. Have the civil courts any jurisdiction after the decla- ration of martial law? MISCELLANEOUS WAR POWERS. 856. May Congress establish factories of armor plate? 857. May a State quarantine a United States naval vessel? 858. Can the United States take merchant vessels into the navy without the consent of the owners ? 859. May the property of individuals be confiscated, as a war measure ? 860. May the United States seize private property of its citizens in time of war without later compensation? 861. Can Congress constitutionally discontinue pensions once granted? 862. May Congress constitutionally diminish pensions once granted? 863. Would it be constitutional to pension self-supporting children of old soldiers? 864. May the United States in time of war seize an enemy's goods on board a neutral vessel? 1321, 132m] FOREIGN RELATIONS 329 132111. Foreign Relations (see Handbook, 20-20;, 21m, 46, 63-92, 120, 151-151c). REPRESENTATION. 865. May Congress by joint resolution recognize the belliger- ency of the Boers ? 866. Has Congress a constitutional right to recognize the independence of a country? 867. May the President decide when an insurgent body is entitled to recognition as a belligerent? 868. May the President appoint foreign envoys without pro- vision by Congress for their salaries? 869. May the President appoint military or naval officers as ministers to foreign countries? 870. May an envoy of the United States be punished for revealing diplomatic secrets? 871. Is an American citizen who acts as Consul for a foreign power in the United States relieved from the jurisdiction of our courts ? 872. Could the United States by statute agree to a perma- nent court of international arbitration? 873. Is an ambassador bound to obey an order of the Sec- retary of State? 874. May a foreign minister in Washington claim a personal conference with the President? TREATIES. 875. Has the Senate a right to be consulted before the beginning of a negotiation? 876. May the President refuse to submit to the Senate a treaty duly negotiated? 877. May the President withdraw a treaty once sent to the Senate for ratification ? 330 CONSTITUTIONAL REPORTS [ 878. May the President with the consent of two-thirds of the Senate declare a treaty abrogated? 879. Has the House of Representatives any constitutional power over treaties? 880. May the House of Representatives refuse appropria- tions necessary to carry out a treaty? 881. May the House require the President to submit papers bearing on commercial treaties? 882. May a treaty be superseded by a statute? 883. May a statute be superseded by a treaty? 884. May a tariff be altered by treaty ? 885. May the Interstate Commerce Act be altered by a treaty ? 886. Was the United States bound by the arbitration of the King of the Netherlands in 1831 ? 887. May Congress appropriate to other purposes sums awarded by arbitration in satisfaction of private claims? 888. May a State be compelled to observe the provisions of a Federal treaty ? 889. May the United States by treaty abandon just claims of merchants against foreign governments, without compensation? 890. May a treaty grant to a foreigner privileges not enjoyed by American citizens ? MONROE DOCTRINE. 891. Would a voluntary transfer of Cuba to France by the Cubans be a violation of the Monroe Doctrine ? 892. Does the Monroe Doctrine apply to the west coast of South America? 893. Does the Monroe Doctrine apply to Patagonia? 894. Does the Monroe Doctrine apply to the West Indies? 895. Would a cession of Dutch Guiana to England be a violation of the Monroe Doctrine ? 132m, 132n] GENERAL WELFARE 331 13211. Uplifting of the Community (see Handbook, 21?i, 39, 122, 153-1530). GENERAL WELFARE. 896. May Congress expend money for every purpose which is for the " general welfare "? 897. May Congress charter a telephone company on the ground that it is for the general welfare? 898. Is there constitutional ground for Hamilton's theory of " resulting powers?" 899. Would the powers of Congress be diminished if the " necessary and proper " clause were excised from the Constitu- tion? 900. Has Congress any resulting powers? 901. May Congress exercise undelegated powers because customary in civilized governments in 1789 ? 902. Is Congress bound to exercise only such powers &s were intended by the Constitution? (Question of amend- ments not to come in.) 903. May Congress impair the obligation of contracts? 904. May Congress create corporations which serve no public purpose? 905. May Congress pass stay and tender acts? 906. May Congress deprive persons of property without due process of law? AID TO THE DISTRESSED. 907. May Congress grant money for the relief of distressed Americans abroad? 908. May Congress vote money as a gift to a foreigner resident abroad? 909. May Congress vote grants of money to Armenian refugees ? 332 CONSTITUTIONAL REPORTS [ 910. May Congress vote money to Americans whose prop- erty has been destroyed by Boxers? 911. May Congress constitutionally grant money for the aid of sufferers from grasshoppers? 912. May Congress distribute flowering plants to private persons ? 913. May Congress pass tender acts by which real estate may be made a legal payment for antecedent debts? 914. May Congress appropriate money for the relief of destitute farmers? 915. May Congress appropriate money for destitute per- sons who come to this country, the victims of foreign oppres- sion? 916. May Congress appropriate money for persons made destitute by fire or flood? 917. May Congress constitutionally appropriate money to be spent in causing rain storms ? 918. May Congress distribute seeds to individuals who are in no special necessity? PUBLIC MORALS. 919. May Congress prohibit the manufacture of liquor? 920. May Congress prohibit the sale of liquor? 921. May a State forbid the sale of liquor brought from another State? 922. May a State forbid the sale of liquor imported from other States in original packages? 923. May Congress establish a government monopoly of the liquor business in the District of Columbia? 924. May Congress constitutionally forbid the transporta- tion of liquor from one State to another? 925. May Congress grant money to establish model farms for the reception of people from city slums? 132n] MORALS AND LABOR 333 926. May Congress prohibit the insertion of immoral ad- vertisements in newspapers? 927. Is a State charter of a lottery company a contract? 928. Could Congress authorize a lottery with the right to sell tickets in the States? 929. May Congress by statute prohibit the use of tobacco? 930. May Congress prohibit football? LABOR. 931. May Congress prescribe uniform hours of labor through- out the United States ? 932. May Congress prescribe an eight-hour day on contract work for the government? 933. May Congress constitutionally pass a general eight- hour law ? 934. May Congress enact an eight-hour day for all the rail- road men engaged in interstate commerce? 935. May Congress prohibit laborers from entering the country on the ground that they will accept wages lower than the Union scale? 936. May Congress prescribe the minimum rate of wages which laborers shall accept? 937. May Congress establish a judicial tribunal with power to decide cases arising between master and workman? 938. May Congress require factory owners to compensate employees for injuries? 939. May Congress direct that no government supplies be bought unless made by American citizens ? 940. May Congress create a national strike-arbitration com- mission ? BUSINESS. 941. Might the United States assume the monopoly of manufacturing and selling liquors? 334 CONSTITUTIONAL REPORTS [ 942. Might Congress carry on gold-mining in Alaska as a government monopoly? 943. May Congress regulate the manufacture of gunpowder as a monopoly ? 944. May Congress grant public lands for the endowment of private steel works? 945. May Congress grant a bounty for the production of silver? 946. May Congress establish government factories to manu- facture for the regular market? 947. May Congress regulate the methods of mining copper? 948. May Congress regulate the manufacture of cotton goods ? EDUCATION. 949. May the United States establish a national university supported by public taxation? 950. May the United States appropriate money for the sup- port of State universities ? 951. May the United States appropriate money for primary education in the States? 952. May Congress construct buildings for State universities ? 953. May the United States appropriate money to support agricultural colleges in the States? 954. Is the United States grant for experiment stations constitutional ? 955. May Congress pay the salaries of United States mili- tary officers wholly engaged in teaching the art of war in Yale University ? 956. May Congress by statute oblige a State to educate its children ? 957. May Congress grant pensions to authors in token of their literary distinctions? 132n] EDUCATION AND RELIGION 335 958. May Congress appropriate money for prizes to in- ventors ? 959. Is the charter of the American Historical Association a contract? 960. May the United States erect model farms at the public expense? RELIGION. 961. May Congress by statute forbid the religious service of a particular church? 962. May Congress grant public land in aid of religious worship ? 963. Would an act that the Chaplains of the House and Senate be always members of the Episcopal Church be an " es- tablishment of religion ? " 964. May Congress by statute direct that chaplains of the army shall be clergymen of a particular church? 965. May a State restrict public officers to adherents of a particular religious body? 966. May Congress appropriate money out of local taxes for the support of the Catholic Church in the Philippines ? 967. May Congress support the Catholic Church in the Philippines out of the proceeds of taxes laid on the States? 968. May Congress support a State church in Porto Rico out of national taxes? 969. Could the United States support the Catholic Church in Porto Rico out of local taxation? 970. May Congress abolish the monasteries in the Philip- pines ? 971. May Congress confiscate the property of a religious society? 972. May Congress forbid the public services of the Mormon Church? 336 CONSTITUTIONAL REPORTS [ 973. May a Congress bind its successors to support reli- gious bodies in Manila? 974. May Congress appropriate money for the construction of churches in the District of Columbia ? 975. May any State in the Union support the Catholic clergy out of the proceeds of public taxes ? 1320. Enforcement (see Handbook, 123, 153/). RESISTANCE. 976. Is the forcible taking of arms out of a United States arsenal an act of treason ? 977. Is it treason to muster men with a view to attack the United States? J978. May Congress make conspiracy with no overt act a crime ? 979. Who decides whether or no there is "rebellion or in- vasion ? " 980. Is it treason to conspire to make war on the United States? 981. Is resistance to the revenue officers a levying of war on the United States? 982. Is it treason to resist United States troops who are putting down a strike? 983. Is the assassination of a President in time of war an act of treason ? MEANS OF ENFORCEMENT. 984. Is the President bound to execute a law which he con- siders unconstitutional? 985. May Congress prescribe in what part of the country the army shall be used ? 986. May vessels of the United States Navy be used to keep order in case of rebellion or insurrection? 132n, 132o] ENFORCEMENT 337 987. May naval forces be used to put down a strike? 988. May troops be used as a posse comitatm ? 989. May the President direct United States regular troops to enforce a State statute ? 990. May United States troops be used to execute the orders of a court? 991. May martial law be now constitutionally declared in Manila? 992. May the President in time of foreign war declare martial law at home ? 993. Can the United States protect foreigners from mob violence in States? PENALTIES. 994. May the President suppress an insurrection against State authority without the request of the State ? 995. May persons be tried by military commissions in dis- tricts far removed from the seat of war? 996. May Congress confiscate the property of insurgents? 997. May the United States legally confiscate property of persons who have not been in arms against the govern- ment? 998. May Congress provide for the confiscation of the prop- erty of Filipino insurgents ? 999. May Congress disqualify insurgents or rebels from, voting ? 1000. May a United States court punish a man for con- tempt who has committed a crime defined by statute ? 1001. Were the signers of secession ordinances of 1861 thereby guilty of treason? 22 338 SLAVERY REPORTS [ 133. Special Reports on Slavery. OBJECT. The purpose of this report is to make the student acquainted with slavery in actual practice, as a social and economic institution ; and at the same time to make him familiar with the literature of the subject. SCOPE. Each student has assigned to him some phase or event in the history or workings of slavery ; on this subject he is to write a condensed narrative, freely introducing quotations from books or other authorities. METHODS. A careful use of classified library catalogues, of the indexes and tables of contents of books, and of the special chapters upon the subject in the standard histories is essential. Students who have family or other connections in the South, or among old abolitionists, are also advised to write to people who are likely to have some personal knowledge of the subject which they are studying, and to ask for information at first hand. All material ought to be classified and the results stated in a logical form. AUTHORITIES. Special bibliographies in Guide, 148, 152. 161, 186-189, 214; in Handbook, 19, *21&, 40, *47, *51, *55, *56, 1405, 140c; Justin Winsor, Narrative and Critical His- tory of America, VII, 323-326 ; Marion Gr. McDougall, Fugitive Slaves; W. H. Siebert, Underground Railroad ; notes to H. Von Hoist, Constitutional History ; J. F. Rhodes, History of the United States ; J. C. Hurd, Law of Freedom and Bondage ; Mary G. Tremain, Slavery in the District of Columbia; Jeffrey R. Brackett, The Negro in Maryland ; Mary E. Locke, Anti- Slavery in America; W. E. B. DuBois, Suppression of the African Slave Trade. The principal books describing slavery and the South in slavery times will be found in the college reserved libraries, with some duplicates in the Evans Library. The library of Radcliffe College has an excellent set of books of this kind. 133-134a] DIRECTIONS 339 The Boston Public Library is also rich in slavery and anti- slavery literature. For students who desire to go very deeply into the subject permission may, in some cases, be had to use the rare slavery tracts presented to the College Library by Thomas W. Higgiuson and by Charles Sumner. . 134. Subjects for Reports on Slavery. The following list of subjects is meant to furnish opportu- nity for brief investigations of questions of fact with reference to the conditions and legal status of slavery, and of the anti- slavery and abolition movements. For the materials on the subject, see Handbook, 133. 1343. Genesis of Slavery in America. ENGLISH SLAVERY. 1. Anglo-Saxon slavery. 2. Chattel slavery in England after the Norman conquest. 3. Villeinage in England. 4. Instances of negro slaves in England prior to 1600. 5. Sale of prisoners of war by the English as slaves for life in the seventeenth century. 6. Facts of the Somerset! Case. 7. Extent of the Somerset! decision. 8. The case of the slave Grace. 9. Englishmen held as galley slaves by the Spaniards. 10. Englishmen held as slaves by the Barbary pirates. 11. Cases of Englishmen kidnapped and sold as life slaves to a colony. 340 SLAVERY REPORTS [ COLONIAL SLAVERY. 12. Existing memorials of former slavery in one of the New England States (slave quarters, slave pews, buildings put up by slave labor, etc.). 13. Existing memorials of slavery in one of the Middle States. 14. Instances of slaves in one of the following early colonies. (a) Plymouth. (&) New Haven. (c) West Jersey. 15. Rhode Island statute against slavery, and practice under it. 16. Legality of slavery in Massachusetts before 1780. 17. Evidences that baptism was looked upon as setting slaves free. 18. Colonial slavery in one of the following places. (a) Boston. (/;) Newport. (c) Cambridge. (d) Portsmouth. (e) Hartford. (/) New Haven. (g) New York. (7i) Albany. (i) Philadelphia. (f) Williamsburg. (k) Charleston. (I) Savannah. 19. Memorials of slavery in one of the following places. (a) Boston. (6) Providence. (c) Newport. (d) New York. (e) Philadelphia. (/) Baltimore. 20. Instances of Indian slaves in one of the early colonies. 21. Slave codes in one of the thirteen English colonies on the Continent. 22. Treatment of slaves in one of the thirteen colonies. 23. Instances of slaves in one of the English continental colonies. (a) Quebec. (&) Nova Scotia. (c) New Bruns- wick. (d) East Florida. (/) Hudson Bay. 24. Conditions of slaves in the English West Indies. 25. Literary career of Phillis Wheatley. 26. Sale of slaves from the British West Indies to the British continental colonies. 134a, 134b] GENESIS 341 27. Colonial attempts to prohibit the slave-trade. 28. White indentured servants in one of the English colo- nies. 29. Instances of white people held as slaves by Indians. SLAVERY IN NEIGHBORING COUNTRIES. 30. Slavery in Brazil. 31. Slavery in Hayti. 32. Slavery in the Sandwich Islands. 33. Slavery in Cuba. 34. Slavery in Louisiana before 1803. 35. Slaves of the French in the Northwest before 1778. 36. Slavery in Mexico. i34b. The Master Race. SOCIAL STATUS OF SLAVE-HOLDERS. 37. Average number of slaves to an owner. 38. Instances of very large slave-holders. 39. Instances of very small slave-holdings. 40. Instances of owners of a single slave. 41. Instances showing the social prestige of slave-holding in the United States. 42. Migrations of planters with their slaves. 43. Absenteeism of Southern planters. 44. Instances of slave-holders who became anti-slavery men. 45. Instances of very violent slave-holders. 46. Representation of slave property in the apportionment for Southern legislatures. TYPES OF SLAVE-HOLDERS. 47. Instances of slaves held as a source of income by phi- lanthropic societies. 48. Instances of Northern-born slave-holders. 342 SLAVERY REPORTS [ 49. Instances of slave-holding Quakers. 50. Foreign-born slave-holders. 51. Instances of slaves owned by lawyers. 52. Instances of slaves owned by doctors. 53. Instances of slaves owned by college professors. 54. Instances of slaves owned by ministers. 55. Instances of slaves held as an investment and hired out* 56. An account of the worst slave-holder that you can find. 57. An account of the best slave-holder that you can find. 58. The management of his plantation and slaves by one of the following slave-holders. (a) George Washington. (b) Thomas Jefferson. (c) James Madison. (d) James Mon- roe. (e) Andrew Jackson. (/) James K. Polk. (g) John Tyler. (7