THE LIBRARY OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES PHILOSOPHICAL and CRITICAL OBSERVATIONS ON THE NATURE, CHARACTERS, AND VARIOUS SPECIES OF COMPOSITION. By JOHN O GIL VIE, D. D. IN TWO VOLUMES. VOL. I. H crwj uv aWwy? trvtrn Ta& TO I1AN, n pj PYQJVTfl tm wit METPft I1ANTA ytyrorrcu. E & I1ANTA a^a, vtoKKu yg fcaXto* O AOrOS, art MM nEPIEKTIKOE AIIANTftN fiN. AONriN. AnOXIIAS. Of all the arts in which mankind excel, Nature's chief mafter-piece is writing well. Buckingham. LONDON, Printed for G. Robinson, in Patemofter-Row. MDCCLXXIV. . CT3Hp ADVERTISEMENT. /N the mofl flour iflnng ages of Greece and Rome, the various branches of the fub- jecl of this Ejjay employed the pens of authors, whofe works every fucceeding age has contemplated with admiration. In the prefent enlightened cera, to whatever frivo- lous objecls the public tajle may have been Jbmetimes directed, the author cannot f up pofe that fuch dfubjecl can fail of being in itfelf univerfally agreeable, as it naturally draws the attention as well ofthofe who occupy the different departments of the A rt, as of the reader who hath perufed their writings with emolument or pleafure. -With regard to the execution in the prefent injiance, every reader will judge for himfelf. The author will neither attempt to raife his ejleem of it, by enlarging on the approbation with which it has been honoured by fome refpeclabk critics ; nor to reprefs juft cenfure by mean acknow-- ledgments of timidity. He will take the li- berty only to obferve, that though the works f/ the mojl eminent ancient and modern wri^ A z ters - r * t * ? * '-V ( n ) ters on the fubject of Compojition have been confulted, and are often referred to in thepre- fenty yet far from following their track with fertility, he has, upon fame occafions, differed from them in opinion^ and has even expofed their blemijhes with freedom. This conduct will difpleafe no reader who obferves that it was neceffary to give examples of the faults, as well as of the beauties of Compojition ; and that both are mofl clearly difcerned, when contra/led properly with each other. Opi- nions which he judged exceptionable, he will likewife be excufed for having attempted to refute, by thofe who acquit him of the only charges that render this conduct inexcus- able petulance, or malignity. Where the writers whom he confulted either fuggefled to his mind a certain train of obfervation, or ferved to confirm and illujlrate fuch as oc- curred to him, he has never failed either to quote the pafj age from their works, or to throw it into the notes ; which lafi, in a work of this kind, have been rendered un- avoidably numerous and protracted. That this coincidence of fentiment did not occur more frequently, the author can only afcribe to the extenfive view which he was led to take of his fubject. His tract in thefirfi part of the work fin which the intellectual powers are ( Mi ) are confdered as influencing Compofition) he was left to chalk out for himfdf*. The lights thrown upon the other branches of it, particularly by the ancient critics., are Jlronger, and more dive? fifed. He has there- fore endeavoured at the fame time to confirm his own obfervations by a variety of exam- ples drawn from their writings, ft be tnoft fir iking of which are made intelligible to. the Englifh reader ), and to relax the mind from rigid difquifition, by placing before it fijm capital jlrokes of the mojl confummate majlers of the art. There is fiill another, and an important branch of the fubjefl that remains' to be treated-, in which it is prop/fed to confder this, divine Art as a. principal means- of promoting the civilization* and the happi-> nefs of mankind. This view of it isnecef* fary to complete the Author s original plan ; though the critical part is fully comprifed in what is now offered to the public. In fo large a compafs as is here taken, and on themes in canvaffing which freedom of thought is not fubjedled to cenfure, there muft be a correfponding variety of opinions., The writer does not form fo idle an expecta- tion, as that every reader will think in the * See the two firft Notes of Sed, I. fame ( iv ) fame manner as himfelf on each of thefe fub* jecls. To the quejlion therefore, By wbatjlandard would you have your perform- ance to be tried V he replies, Let the fame degree of candour and impartiality be employed in judging of the merit or de- fects of the following obfervations, which the author himfelf has applied to thofe of every author, ancient or modern, which in the pro- fecution of this attempt he hath had occafion to invejligate, N. B. The reader will obferve that the terms Under/landing, Judgment, Reafon, are ufed to fgnify the fame intellectual power, though thefirjl of thefe, Jl r icily fpeaking, is of larger import. This liberty the author took in order to avoid repetitions. CONTENTS- BOOK i. Of Compofition as it regards the Faculties of the Mind. SECTION I. Introductory Obfervations on the Nature of Compaction. p % i S E C T I O N II. Of the Province of the Underfianding in Compofition. 44. SECTION III, Of the influence of Imagination on Com- poftion. 56 SECTION IV. Of Penetration or Difcernment, as it re- gards Compofition, 173 SECTION V. Of the Vfe of Memory in Compofition. 225 SEC- vi CONTENTS. SECTION VI. Of the 'various Combinations of intellectual Powers in the different fpecies of Com- pofition. p, 248 ' SECTION VII. Of that Combination of the intellectual Fa- culties which gives rife to the arts of Poetry and Criticifm. 293 SECTION VIII. Whether that balance of the intellectual Powers, from which the perfection of Compofition refults, can be obtained \ and by what methods we can make the nearejl approach to it, 376 The following ERRORS wefe occafioned by the Author's diftance from the Prefs. Page 29. line 6. of the note, for throw read thrown. P. 133. |. 7, ftr conflux read conflict. P. 149. 1, 24 of the note, for in read of. P. 176. I. 11. for abftains read obtains. P. 202. I. 24. read in the art, &c. P. 209. 1'. 22. for a while read and while. P. 230. 1. 8. of the rtote, for in concluding read to conclude. P. 238. 1. 21. plate the ( ; ) after the tvord whatever. P. 247. 1. 6, of the note, for Cinzas read Cineas. P. 271, ]. 9. for or read for. 1. 10. for mild read wild. P. 317. i. 3. of the note, dele the. P. 368. 1. 12, 13. for perfpicacity read per. fpicuity, P. 412, 1. 9. after venture add to propofe. PHILOSOPHICAL and CRITICAL OBSERVATIONS H COMPOSITION. cticooooaooec*ocoooco*coooooQcoooc<>dot04oce9ooGcoocca5coooec9eeoMceee5soo*c*ocecscc*4 BOOK I. Of Gompofition as it regards the Faculties of the Mmdi SECTION I. introductory Observations on the Nature of Compoftion. COMPOSITION will probably be contemplated by a mind that reflects on its nature, importance, and tendency, in the two following general lights, It will be confidered in one view as the refult of a peculiar combination, and pro- penfity of the faculties of the mind : in another, as an art-, diftinguifhed by par* Vol. L B ticular 2 Philofophical and Critical ticular characters, divided into various fpe- cies ; and producing effects of the greater! importance to the civilization and happinefs of mankind. It is propofed, in the prefent Eflay, to examine this copious fubject un- der thefe general heads : in the profecution of which, after having endeavoured to point out the fpheres of the intellectual powers in this art, to mark the fignatures by which each is difcriminated; to difplay their diverflfied combinations, and to lay down fuch rules as tend to bring thefe moft nearly to an equipoife, when found to have been originally difproportioned ; we propofe to confider, in feparate fections, the principal characters of claffical compo- fition; to take a view of its various fpe- cies, as formed by the union of thefe cha- racters; and to conclude the work by mak- ing fome obfervations on the defign, im- portance, and tendency of the art. As it will be obvious to any perfon who hath read on this fubject, that we muft here underftand the term Compofition (thus comprehenfively viewed) in a larger fenfe than hath formerly been afhgned to it, Obfervations on Coinpofition. 3 it 1 *, we mall make a few remarks, in the prefent fe&ion, on the powers that occupy its * Our meaning will be greatly miftaken, if it is fup- pofed that any general cenfure is implied here on the authors who have examined this fubjedr. ; as if their views of it had been contracted and defective. Far otherwife. By faying that the term Compofition is taken in this Eflay in a larger fenfe,or includes a greater variety of parts than thefe affign to it, we intend only to point out the difference betwixt a general definition, including every branch of a comprehenfive art ; and one adapted more immediately to fome detached field, or department of it. The philofophical critic, it is obvious, may take a view of the prefent theme fuffi- ciently adequate as far as this fcience is concerned, though propriety will require that it fhould extend to nothing beyond it. The fame remark may be ap- plied to poetry, eloquence, hiftory, confidered as fpe- cies of one comprehenfive art. In each it is obvious that the definition of this term, when applied to any of thefe feparately, muft neceffarily include fewer ob- jects, and take in a much lefs compafs upon the whole, than when it is viewed as relating to all. It happens indeed frequently, that in confequence of that natural propertfity, which every writer feels to place his own fubject in as important a light as poffible, and to make it comprehend the moft various affemblage, accounts of thefe are pompoufly given, which difpaffionate rea- fon may reject as exaggerated. In this manner the different provinces of this art, inftead of being proper- ly difcriminated, are promifcuoufly blended together, B 2 and 4 PhiJofophical and Critical its various departments; as neceflary t6 place before the mind a full and appropri- ated idea of the fubjed *, The and the mind, after having confidered what different writers have advanced on each, finds itfelf wholly at a lofs to determine its bounds with precifion. It is this circumftance principally which renders it a matter of fo much difficulty to felecl:, in treating particular fub-' jects, the composition that it is beft adapted to its na- ture. Hence the philofopher, either afFuming too of- ten the drefs of the orator, or laying it afide altoge- ther, in a fphere where he meets with models of each kind, is in hazard, according to the particular biafs of his mind, of making too much, or too little ufe of the ornaments of difcourfe, by which means his expreffion is rendered either florid, or enervated and unintereft- ing. The obfervation hath equal force when applied to the other branches abovementioned. A general view of the art, in which we confider not only what conltitutes the perfection of each character contem- plated by itfelf, but in what manner the concurrence of all ought to diftinguifh its various fpecies, mud fupply thefe defects if properly executed. The com- parifon of thefe lad with each other likewife, will na- turally produce a clearer and more particular notion of what is juft and appropriated in each, than can be obtained by efh'mates formed from the writings of different authors, whofe views have' regarded fingle parts , and whofe manner of treating them varies, according to their diverfity of tafte and difpofition. That Obfervations on Compofiiton. 5 The faculties of the mind, whofe offices in the province of composition we propofe to That the ancients in general, who have examined the feveral branches of competition with great .accuracy, lay down the beffc rules, and exhibit the nobleft models for imitation in every department, will be called in queftio.n by no man who is converfant with their works. Many modern performances both abound with precepts, and difplay examples that are equally admirable. It is a considerable part of our "bufinefs in the following work to confirm this truth, partly by a critical examination of fuch obfervations, particularly of the former, as relate moft immediately to the prefent fubjecT:, carried on with the utmoft im- partiality ; and partly byilluftrations of the characters by which the artisdrftinguifhed, drawn from the moft eminent performances, both ancient and modern. The author intends only from the remarks made in this note to fuggeft a plea in his own vindication, to thofe who may cenfure him for having made choice of a theme that hath employed the pens .f fo many iliuftri- ous writers; and an excufefor his differing in opinion lo often from fome of them. The relation in which he was led to confider one part as franding to another, makes him affign a narrower precinct: to it, than would probably have been the cafe, had heconfidered each of thefe apart. This the reader will keep uniformly in ,his eye. * We propofe here to lay before the reader fbme of B 3 the 6 Philofophlcal and Critical to confider feparately, and even if poffible to determine with fome precifion, are the un- derstanding, the various meanings that have been given to the word Compofition by authors of the greateffc eminence, in or- der to confirm an obfervation made in the preceding note. Dionyfius of Halicarnalfus, in his excellent treatife IIEPI STN0EIEH2 ONOMATX2N, enters upon his fubject by explaining the fenfe of this term, which he confiders in two different lights. His firffc definition is general, relating to the common accep- tation of the phrafe. H 2TN0ESIS ri/, utnrtg xxi uto hXoi ovoy-x, nOlATIS EII2 FLAP' AAAHAA TON TOT AOrOT MOPmN ITITPAM : Tom. 2. p 2. edit. Lipfic. This account of the art, in which the whole weight lies upon a due diftribution or order of parts, includes unqueftionably one principal pro- vince of compofition. But confidercd as a definition of the fubjecl: taken in one comprehenfive view, it is defective, as we receive from it no idea of the proprie- ty and harmony of modulated language correfponding to the fentiment of a work, or of beauty arifing from happy illufhation. Thefe points, however, are fully included in his next definition, which relates to his own fubject, and is much more particular. Er 2t tj? TN0EE2Z EPrA oixnw? ^nvxi rxrt OvopxTa -rrxo aAA*iAa, xxi tqi; xojAoi; xttoSowxi tw 7Tf>o