LIBRARY
ONIVCRSITY OP
CALIFOfiNIA
^ IAN DIESO
V3
n
;j THISBOOK E
*^^ WAS RIVES BY THE ^^
I %s-M\ii of i\)t lalc !{tb. Dr. fm) I
i CLERICAL LENDING LIBRARY m
; /;/ f/ic County of C^^^TZ:..'^, p
::|:; .-7;^./ 7;/^^^^ of (2:?^ri^r:^.f^.. %
■ ;", - '£^^>-^ 1 8 ^ ^
19, DELAHAY STFfEET, S-W- "^"^
im^im^mmmm^^m^m^^, .;
,'.55 d 1
PARKER & SOX,
R XJ X^ E S
PRESERVATION OF DR. BRAY'S LENDING
LIBRARIES
- IN-JEIIE— eOXXtNIE S.
1
1. The Bishop of the diocese shall be requested to act as
Visitor of the Library.
2. Three or more clerg-ymen shall be appointed trustees to
take charg-e of the books.
3. On the death, removal from the neighbourhood, or re-
signation of any trustee, the remaining- trustees shall
appoint a successor, to be approved" by the bishop,
from among the neighbouring Clergy, and inform the
Associates of the appointment ; or in the event of their
neglecting to make such appointment within three
months after the occurrence of a vacancy, the Bishop
may appoint a successor.
4. The trustees shall appoint a librarian, and furnish him
from time to time with the names of the clergymen
entitled to the use of the Library.
5. The librarian, on his appointment, shall make three
catalogues of the books, w^hich shall be signed by the
trustees. One copy shall be sent to the" Associates'
secretary in London'^, one to the Bishop of the diocese,
and the third shall be kept with the books.
6. The librarian shall, before the end of January in every
third year, report to the Bishop the number, titles, and
condition of the books under his care, and send a copy
of such report countersigned by one or more of the
trustees to the Associates' secretary.
7. Any person losing or injuring any of the books shall be
answerable to the trustees for the loss or injury.
8. On any volume being borrowed or returned, an entry
shall be made thereof in the register provided by the
Associates,
g. The trustees may make any regulations for the manage-
ment of the Library, not inconsistent with the above
Rules.
^--O^^y^^-'
THE ANNOTATED
BOOK OF COMMON PRAYER
3t
THE ANNOTATED
Book of Common Prayer
BEING AN
HISTORICAL, RITUAL, AND THEOLOGICAL COMMENTARY
ON THE DEVOTIONAL SYSTEM
OF
Cl)e Cljurcl) of Cnglanti
EDITED BY THE REV.
JOHN HENRY BLUNT, D.D.
AUTHOR OF "THE HISTORY OF THE REFORMATION"
EDITOR OF "the DICTIONARY OF THEOLOGY"
ETC.
' 5nju« 0att1) tl)c Lorn, %itanD pc in tlir loavs, aim gee, ann ask for tijc oln pat^a, tolicte \i tlie goon toap,
ann toallt tljctein, aim pr sliall fi'im rftit for pour Bonis."— Jeremiah vi. i6
NEW EDITION
R I V I N G T O N S
WATERLOO PLACE, LONDON
MDCCCLXXXVIII
TO HIS GRACE
THE MOST REVEREND AND RIGHT HONOURABLE FATHER IN GOD
EDWARD WHITE
BY DIVINE PROVIDENCE
LORD ARCHBISHOP OF CANTERBURY
PRIMATE OF ALL ENGLAND
AND METROPOLITAN
REGARDED ALSO AS
PATRIARCH
OF THE CHURCH OF ENGLAND AND HER DAUGHTER CHURCHES
THROUGHOUT THE WORLD
THIS NEW AND ENLARGED EDITION OF
^U annotateD TBoofe of Common Iprager
IS
BY PERMISSION
Eesfpcctfullp Detiicateli
WITH THE SINCERE AND HUMBLE PRAYER
THAT IT MAY HAVE THE DIVINE BLESSING
FOR THE PROMOTION OF
GODLY UNITY AND EXPEDIENT UNIFORMITY
THROUGHOUT THE COMMUNION OVER WHICH
HIS GRACE IS CALLED TO PRESIDE
PREFACE.
rriHE present edition of the Annotated Prayer Book has been carefully revised in
-*- every part, many additions have been made, and the form of the page has been
so altered as to bring the references conveniently together, with letters of reference
carried across the page through both columns in regular succession.
[1] The Historical Intkoduction has been entirely rewritten, and much
additional matter has been included. This is especially the case in the account of the
Revision of 1661, where the constitutional manner in which the Ecclesiastical work of
revision was ratified by the Civil authorities is now much more fully illustrated from
the Journals of the Houses of Lords and Commons.
[2] The Notes on the Minor Festivals have also been entirely rewritten by
their author, the Rev. Joseph Thomas Fowler of Durham, who has spared no pains in
the endeavour to give them a critical value as trustworthy, though necessarily very
condensed, accounts of the Saints commemorated on those days.
[3] The Gospels and Epistles have been printed at length, with some critical
improvements which ajDpear in the Manuscript of the Prayer Book, but which were
unaccountably neglected in the Sealed Books and in subsequent editions. These
improvements are more particularly referred to below.
[4] The Psalms have been revised m the same manner from the Manuscript of
the Prayer Book and from the Great Bible. Brief historical notices of the Psalms
have also been added to the Liturgical references given in former editions.
[5] The Introduction to the Ordinal has been much enlarged by the addition
of Tables shewing, in as much detail as space will allow, the course of Ministerial
descent and succession from our Lord and His Apostles to the hving Clergy of the
Church of England.
The Text of the Prayer Book in former editions was that of the Sealed
Books, but care has been taken in this edition to bring it into exact agreement with
that of the Manuscript subscribed by the Convocations of Canterbury and York, and
VIU
Iprcface to ti)c rctiiscD
annexed by Parliament to the Act of Uniformity. The Editor has made repeated
applications for permission to collate this Manuscript ; and, after much correspondence,
the following final reply was received by him : —
" House of Lords, Aur/mt 2Zrd, 1880.
SiE,— I am directed by the Clerk of the Parliaments to inform you that the Parliament Office
Committee have had under consideration your request of the 8th of June last, for permission to correct the
text of the forthcoming edition of your Annotated Prayer Book with the MS. Book formerly attached to
the Act of Uniformity, and that the Committee are of opinion that your application should not be acceded
to. I have further to inform you that the Report of the Committee has been agreed to by the House.
I am, Sir,
Ynur obedient Servant,
ED. M. PARRATT.
The Editor had, however, by the kind permission of Lord Caii-ns, been permitted
to make use of the Manuscript to some extent ; and he is now able to say that the
Text of the Annotated Book of Common Prayer, as printed in the following pages,
faithfully represents that of the Manuscript except in respect to the conventional
spelling and punctuation of the seventeenth century : and that where any impoitant
meaning depended on either spelling or punctuation they also have been faithfully
reproduced.
Amono- the corrections of the Text which have been introduced into the present
edition in consequence of this examination of the Manuscript, two are especially to be
noticed; namely, the accurate reproduction of the Authorized Version of 1611 in the
Gospels and Epistles ; and of the "Great Bible " in the Psalms. For the Gospels and
Epistles the Text of the Annotated Bible has been used, that Text being formed from
a comparison of an Oxford Standard Text [minion, small 8vo, niarg. re£] Avith the Cam-
bridge Authorized Version edited by Dr. Scrivener. The Italics have been carefully
inserted as they appear in the same Text ; and mterpolated words, such as " Jesus
said," are distinguished from the actual Text by being printed mtliin brackets. For the
Psalms the Bible of 1539 has been used. The Italics of this (which are printed in Roman
type in the original black-letter Bible) differ slightly here and there from those marked
as such in the Manuscript of the Prayer Book ; but as the intention of the Revisers of
1661 was to reproduce accurately the Psalter as it appears in "The Translation of the
Great English Bible set forth and used in the time of King Henry the Eighth and
Edward the Sixth," it has been thought best to take Cranmer's Bible, the Authorized
Version of 1539, as the standard.
Since the original publication of the Annotated Prayer Book in 1866, many works
have been published which help to throw Hght on the ancient devotional usages of the
Church of England ; and the Editor has made free use of these for the further improve-
ment of this eighth edition. All these are included in the " List of Litiu-gical and
Historical Authorities " printed at page xv, but particular mention should be made
here of Messrs. Procter and Wordsworth's edition of the Sarum Breviary ; of Dr.
anD cnlargcD (ZBDition. ix
Henderson's editions of the York Missal, Manual, and Pontifical, and of the Hereford
Missal; of Mr. Simmons' admirably edited Laij Folk's Mass Book; of Mr. Chambers'
Worship of the Church of England in the Fourteenth and Nineteenth Centuries; and of
the late ]\Ir. Scudamore's Notitia Eucharistica.
During these seventeen years the Editor has also received many kind communica-
tions in which criticisms have been offered, corrections made, or improvements suggested.
It would be impossible to refer to these in detail, but he desires to mention particularly
the names of three special contributors to the original work. Professor Bright, the Rev.
J. T. Fowler, and the Rev. T. W. Perry, as having rendered invaluable assistance
towards weeding out errors and making the work generally more perfect. The Litur-
gical references to the Psalms were also revised with great care for a former edition
by the Rev. C. F. S. Warren ; and the enlarged Table of Ecclesiastical Colours has
been contributed for this edition by the Rev. Christopher Wordsworth, Rector of
Glaston. To other correspondents, both in England and America, the Editor begs to
offer his sincere thanks for their communications, and to add that they have aill received
careful consideration, often with advantage to the work.
In conclusion, the Editor desires to say, that although he and his coadjutors have
felt it to be their duty to go into much detail respecting ancient ritual, that the history
of ritual might be the more effectually illustrated, it must not be supposed that the
revived use of all such details is advocated in this work. So far as the Annotated
Prayer Book may be supposed to exercise influence in any degree on a revival of
ritual, the Editor's one great object has been that of assisting the Clergy and Laity of
the Church of England in the establishment of a godly, manly, and rational system, by
which He Who originally ordained and instituted ritual observances may be honoured,
and by which they who offer them may be built up in faith and reverence.
Orfnher 1883. .
PREFACE TO FORMER EDITIONS.
rriHIS work is an attempt to gather into one concise view all the most important
-'- information that is extant respecting the devotional sj'stem of the Church of
England as founded on the Book of Common Prayer.
Much research and study have heen expended upon this subject during the last
quarter of a century ; and the Prayer Book has been largely illustrated by the works of
Sir AVilliam Palmer, Mr. Maskell, and Archdeacon Freeman. Many smaller books than
these have also been published with the object of bringing into a compact form the
results of wide and learned investigations : the most trustworthy and complete of
all such books being Mr. Procter's excellent History of the Booh of Common Prayer,
ivith a Rationale of its Offices. But it has long seemed to the Editor of the present
volume that a work of another kind was wanted, which (without superseding any pre-
vious one of established merit) should exhibit more concisely and perspicuously the
connection between the ancient and the modern devotional system of the Church
of England by placing the two side by side, as far as the former is represented in the
latter : and which should also give a general condensed illustration of our present Prayer
Book from all those several points of view from which it must be regarded if it is to
be properly understood and appreciated.
Perhaps there is no one book, except the Holy Bible, which has been so much
written about as the Prayer Book since the Beformation, and perhaps so much was
never written about any one book which left so much still unsaid. The earliest class of
commentators is represented by John Boys, who died Dean of Canterbury in 1619, and
who had in earlier life published a Volume of Postils which were preceded by a diffuse
comment on the principal parts of the Prayer Book. In these there is much ponderous
learning, but a total absence of any Liturgical knowledge. Bishop Andrewes and Arch-
bishop Laud began to open out the real meaning and the true bearing of our Offices,
being well acquainted with the Greek Liturgies, and ha\dng some knowledge, at least, of
the Breviaries and the Missals of the Church of England. L'Estrange, Sparrow, Cosin,
and Elborow represent a still further advance towards a true comprehension of the
Prayer Book ; Bishop Cosin especially being thoroughly familiar with the Sarum Missal,
and perhaps with the Breviary and other Office-books of the old Church of England
In the latter part of the seventeenth century, Liturgical studies seem, indeed, to have been
taken up by many of the Clergy, especially by the Nonjurors, and interleaved Prayer
Books are preserved in the Bodleian and other libraries which testify to the industry
that was shewn in illustrating its text, especially from the Greek Liturgies. None seem
so thoroughly to have qualified themselves for the task of illustrating and intei-preting
the Book of Common Prayer as Fothergill, a nonjuror, whose interleaved Prayer Book
in eleven large volumes, together with his unmatched collection of old English Service-
Iprcfacc to former coitions. xi
books, is now in the Chapter Library at York.^ But his notes and quotations were not
digested into order : and although a work founded upon them would have been invalu-
able in days when there was no better authority than the superficial Wheatley, they have
since been superseded by the publications of Palmer and Maskell.
The works of Comber, Wheatley, and Shepherd, were doubtless of great value in
their way ; but it is melancholy to observe that they tended in reality to alienate the
minds of their readers from all thought of Unity and Fellowship with the Church of our
Fathers, and set up two idols of the imagination, a Church originated in the sixteenth
century, and a Liturgy " compiled," and in the main invented, by the Reformers. There
is not a single published work on the Prayer Book previous to the publication of
Palmer's Origines Liturgicce in 1832, which makes the least attempt to give a truthful
view of it, so thoroughly was this shallow conceit of a newly-invented Liturgy ingrained
in the minds of even our best writers.
Notwithstanding, therefore, the great abundance of works on the Book of Common
Prayer, there seems to be still ample room for one like the present, in which the spirit
of our Offices is illustrated from their origin and history as well as from their existing
form ; and in which a large body of material is placed before the reader by means whereof
he may himself trace out that history, and interpret that spirit.
The object of the present work may be stated, then, to be that of illustrating and
explaining the Devotional system of the Church of England by (1) a careful comparison
of the Prayer Book with the original sources from which it is derived, (2) a critical
examination of all the details of its history, and (3) a full consideration of the aspect in
which it appeal's when viewed by the light of those Scriptural and j^rimitive principles
on which the Theology of the Church of England is founded.
For the plan of the work, the general substance of it, and for all those portions the
authorship of which is not otherwise indicated, the Editor must be held responsible.
For the details of the text and notes in those parts which have been contributed by
others (excepting the Marginal References), the authors must, of course, be considered
individually responsible. Circumstances have arisen which threw into the Editor's hands
a larger proportion of the work than he originally intended to undertake, especially in
connection with the Communion and the Occasional Offices ; but he does not wish to
claim any indulgence on this account, being fully assured that a commentary of the kind
here offered ought to be judged solely by its merits as an authentic interpreter and
guide. The Introduction to the Communion Service and the earlier portion of the
Notes upon it are by the Editor.
In the Offices for the Visitation and Communion of the Sick, the Editor has to
acknowledge valuable assistance from a friend who does not permit his name to be used.
Those Offices have been treated in a rather more homiletic method than most of the
' Marmaduke Fothergill was born at York in l(i52, took j collection of ancient Service-books, which, with the rest of his
his degree at Magdalene College, Cambridge, and became i Library, he left to Skipwith parisli, on condition of a room
Rector of Skipwith. In l(i88 he was ollered the Rectory of • being built to receive them. This not being done, the widow
Lancaster, but not being able to take the oaths to William applied to Chancery, and by a decree of that court the books
and Mary, he could neither accept preferment nor receive \ were all handed over to York Minster. Mr. Fothergill
the degree of D.D., for which be bad qualified. He lived at also left an endowment of £50 a year for a catechist at
Pontefract, till driven thence by a Wliig J. P., but died in Pontefract. His volumes shew that he was a most indus-
Westminster, on Sept. 7, 1731. Mr. Fothergill made a noble trious reader.
xii Preface to fonncr €Ditions.
others, in the hope that the Notes may assist in persuading both Lay and Clerical
readers to desire a more pointed and systematic apijlication of the Church's gifts in time
of Sickness than that which is offered by the prayers ordinarily used.
The text is, of course, that of the Sealed Books ; but some liberty has occasionally
been taken with the punctuation, which, whether in the Sealed Books, or in the copies
sent out by the Universities and the Queen's Printers, is in a most unsatisfactory
condition. In the Psalms and Canticles, a diamond-shaped "point" has been used for
the purpose of more plainly marking the musical division of verses, as distinguished from
the grammatical punctuation. The spelling is also modernized throughout.
In conclusion, the Editor begs to tender his grateful thanks to many friends wlio
have assisted him with- their suggestions and advice. Those thanks are also especially
due to the Rev. T. W. Perry, and to the Rev. W. D. Macray of the Bodleian Library,
who have gone through all the proof-sheets, and have been largely instrumental in
securing to the reader accuracy in respect to historical statements.
The Editor is indebted to the Rev. John Bacchus Dykes, M.A., and Doctor of
Music, Vicar of St. Oswald's, Durham, and late Precentor of Durham Cathedi-al, for
the Second Section of the Ritual Introduction, on The Manner of performing Divine
Service.
The Third Section of the Ritual Introduction, on The Accessories of Divine
Service, is by tlie Rev. Thomas Walter Perry, Vicar of Ardleigh, Essex, author of
Lawful Church Ornaments, etc. etc.
The Rev. Joseph Thomas Fowler, M.A., F.S.A., Hebrew Lecturer, and Vice-
Principal of Bishop Hatfield Hall, Durham, is the writer of the Notes on the Minor
Holydays of the Calendar.
The Rev. William Bright, D.D., Regius Professor of Ecclesiastical History,
Oxford, and author of A History of the Church from a.d. 313 to a.d. 451, Ancient
Collects, etc. etc., is the writer of the Introduction to, and Notes on, the Litany.
Also of the Essay on the Scottish Liturgy in the Appendix.
The Rev. Peter Goldsmith Medd, M.A., Rector of North Cerney, Gloucestershire,
Canon of St. Albans, and late Fellow of University College, Oxford, co- Editor with
Dr. Bright of the Latin Prayer Book, and author of Household Prayer, etc., is the
principal writer of the Notes on the Communion Office from the Church Militant
Prayer to the end ; and the compiler of the Appendix to that Office. Mr. Medd has
also contributed the references to the hymns of the seasons.
The Rev. Mackenzie E. C. Walcott, B.D., F.R.S.L., F.S.A., of Exeter College,
Oxford, Precentor and Prebendary of Chichester Cathedral, and author of The English
Ordinal, etc. etc., has contributed the Introduction to, and Notes on, the Ordinal.
The Editor also desires to acknowledge his obligations to the valuable libraries of
the Cathedrals of Durham and York ; to Bishop Cosin's Library, and the Routh
Library, at Durham ; and to the Hon. and Rev. Stephen Willoughby Lawley, M.A.,
formerly Rector of Escrick, and Sub-Dean of York, to whom the reader is indebted for
some rare mediaeval illustrations of the Occasional Offices, and whose courtesy has
otherwise facilitated that portion of the work.
[1866-1882.]
TABLE OF CONTENTS.
By Rev. J. B. Dykes, Mus. D.
W. Perry
Preface .....
Preface to former Editions
List of Authorities ....
Chronological Table ....
An Historical Introduction to the Prayer Book
A Ritual Introduction to the Prayer Book —
Section I. The Principles of Ceremonial Worship .
Section II. The Musical Perfonnance of Divine Service.
Section III. The Accessories of Divine Service. By Rev. T.
Title, etc., of the Sealed Prayer Books
Acts of Uniformity .....
Preface, etc., to the Prayer Book
Tables and Rules .....
An Introduction to the Calendar
The Calendar, with Comparative View
Notes on the Minor Holydays. By Rev. J. T. Fowler
An Introduction to Morning and Evening Prayer
Morning Prayer .....
Evening Prayer .....
Athanasian Creed .....
An Introduction to the Litany. By Rev. W. Bright
The Litany, with Notes. By Rev. W. Bright
Occa.sional Prayers and Thanksgivings
An Introduction to the Collects, Epistles, and Gospels
The Collects, Epistles, and Go.spels .
An Introduction to tlie Liturgy
The Order for the Holy Communion, with Notes. By Rev. P. G. Medd, and the Editor
An Introduction to the Offices for Holy Baptism
The Ministration of Publick Baptism of Infants, with Notes
The Ministration of Private Baptism of Children in Houses, with Notes
The Ministration of Baptism to such as are of Riper Years, with Notes
An Introduction to the Catechism .
The Catechism, with Notes ....
An Introduction to the Confirmation Office .
The Order of Confirnuition, with Notes
An Introduction to the Marriage Service
The Form of Solemnization of Matrimony, with Notes
An Introduction to the Office for the Visitation of the Sick
The Order for the Visitation of the Sick, with Notes
The Communion of the Sick, with Notes
An Introduction to the Burial Service
The Order for the Burial of the Dead, with Notes
An Appendix to the Burial Office .
PAGE
vii
X
XV
xix
1
44
50
63
81
84
96
116
127
130
132
177
179
206
216
221
225
235
241
245
344
369
401
407
420
424
428
431
437
440
446
449
460
461
472
475
478
483
XIV
Contents.
An Introduction to the Churching Service
The Churching of Women, with Notes
The Commination, with Notes
An Introduction to the Psalter
The Psalms, with Notes
Forms of Prayer to be used at Sea, with Notes
An Introduction to the Ordinal. By Kev. Mackenzie E. 0. Walcott
The Form and Manner of Making Deacons, with Notes. Ditto .
The Form and Manner of Ordering of Priests, with Notes. Ditto .
The Form of Ordaining or Consecrating of an Archbishop or Bishoji, with Notes. Ditto
Gexeral Appendix —
I. The State Services. By Rev. W. D. Macray ....
II. The Scottish Prayer Book of 1G37. By Rev. \V. Bright
III. Tlie Irish Prayer Book. By Rev. W. D. JNIacray
Index and Glossary .........
PAGE
486
487
490
496
501
650
655
674
683
693
703
705
709
713
ILLUSTRATIONS.
A Horn Book ........
Ecclesiastical Vestments (two Plates). By G. E. Stieet, Esq., R.A., F.S.A.
Catechism Tablets from the Bishop's Palace at Ely ....
To face page 80
429
A LIST OF THE PKINCIPAL
LITURGICAL AND HISTORICAL AUTHORITIES
USED, QUOTED, OR REFERRED TO, IN THIS WORK.
The Manuscript Prayer Book, subscribed Ijy the Convocations of Canterbury and York, accepted by the Crown in Council,
annexed by Parliament to the Act of Uniformity, and preserved among the Acts of Parliament as an original Record.
A printed Prayer Book of 1636, into which the alterations to be made were written for the information of the Crown, the
Privy Council, and the two Houses of Parliament ; and whicli is preserved with the Manuscript.
A facsimile of the preceding volume, photozincographed by the Ordnance Office.
A printed Prayer Book of 1619, containing alterations proposed by Bishop Cosin, most of which were adopted in 1661.
[D. iii. 5, Cosin's Library, Durham.]
A printed Prayer Book, containing Bancroft's transcript of the notes in the preceding volume. [Bodl. Lib. Arch.
Rodl. D. 28.]
The Sealed Prayer Books.
Masters' Eeprint. 1848.
See Pickering, Stephens, infra.
Acta Sanctorum, 1643 — stUl in course of publication.
Amalarius Symphosius [circ. a.d. 820-827], De Divin. Off. Cologne, 1568. [Blbl. Max. Lugd. xiv. 934-1060.]
Andrewes, Bishop. Notes on Prayer Book. Misc. Works, Ang. Cath. Lib. 1854.
Anglican Church Calendar. 1851.
Assemanus, Jos. Codex Liturgicus Eccl. Universse. 1749-63.
Baker, Sir Richard. On the Lord's Prayer. 1638.
Baring-Gould, S. Lives of the Saints. 1872-77.
Baruffaldus, Hier. Comment, ad Rituale Romanum. 1731.
Beleth [thirteenth century]. Rationale Divin. Off. Lyons, 1612.
Bingham, Jos. Antiquities of the Christian Church. 1710-22. Last edit. 1843-5.
Blunt, J. H. Directorium Pastorale. 1864.
Annotated Bible. 1878-82.
History of the Reformation. 1868-82. i
Bona, Cardinal. De Rebus Liturg. Paris, 1676. Sala's ed., 1747-55.
De Divina Psalmodia. Antwerp, 1677.
Brady, J. Clavis Calendaria. 1812.
Brett, Tho. Ancient Liturgies. 1720.
Breviary, Mozarabic. Brev. Gothicum. 1775.
Roman. [And see Quignonez, infra.]
Salisbury. 1495-1541.
fascc. i., iL 1843-5.
York. 1403-1526.
Bright, Will. Ancient Collects and other Prayers. 1857.
Brogden, Jas. Illustrations of the Liturgy. 1842.
BuUey, Fred. Variations of the Communion and Baptismal Offices. 1S42.
Burn, R. Ecclesiastical Law. Phillimore's cd., 1842.
Burnet, Bishop. History of the Reformation. Pocock's ed., 1865.
Vindication of English Ordinations. 1677.
Calendars of State Papers. Domestic. 1547-80.
1660-2.
Cardwell, Edw. Documentary Annals of the Reformed Church of England. 1839, 1844.
History of Conferences on the Prayer Book. 1840.
Synodalia. 1842.
xvi a List of autfjoritiEs.
CardweU, Edw. Two Liturgies of Edward VI. 1838.
Catalanus, J. C. Pontif. Roman., commentariis illustratum. 1738.
Chambers, J. D. Divine Worship in England in the Thirteenth, Fourteenth, and Nineteenth Centuries. 1877.
Churton, Ai-chd. E. Life of Dean Nowell. 1809.
Collier, Jer. Ecclesiastical History of Great Britain. 1708-14 and 1845-6.
Comber, Thos. [On the Common Prayer.]
Cosin, Bishop. Collection of Private Devotions. 1627.
Notes and Collections on the Prayer Book. Worts, Vol. V. Ang. Oath. Lib. 1855.
Cranmer, Archbp. Eemains, edited by Jenkyns. 1833.
Daniel, H. A. Codex Liturgicus. 1847-54.
Thesaurus Hymnologicus. 1855-6.
Denzinger, H. Ritus Orientalium. 1863-4.
Durandus [a.d. 1216]. Rationale Divin. Off. Lyons, 1612.
Durantus, D. De Ritibus Eccl. Cath. 1675.
Dyce, W. Book of Common Prayer with Plain Tune. 1843-4.
Elborow, Thos. E.xposition of the Book of Common Prayer. 1663.
English Church Union Kalendars. 1863-4.
Fallow, T. M. The Order of Baptism illustrated. 1838.
Field, J. E. Apostolic Liturgy and Epistle to the Hebrews. 1882.
Fleury, CI. Ecclesiastical History. Newman's translation. 1842-4.
Forbes, Bishop Alex. P. Explanation of the Nicene Creed. 1852.
Commentary on the Litany. 1855.
Freeman, Archd. Ph. Principles of Divine Service. 1863.
Rites and Ritual. 1866.
Gallican Liturgies, Neale and Forbes's. Burntisland, 1855-67.
Gavantus, Barth. Thesaurus Sacrorum Rituum. 1762.
Gelasius's Sacramentary [a.d. 492]. In Muratori's Liturgia Eoniaua.
Gerbertus, Mart. Vetus Liturgia Alemannica. 1776.
Gibson, Bishop Edm. Synodus Anglicana. 1702 and 1854.
Goar, J. Eituale Grsecorum. 1647.
Goulburn, Dean E. M. The CoUects of the Day. 1880.
Grancolas, J. Commentarius historicus in Breyiarium Romanum. Venice, 1734.
Grand Debate between the Bishops and Presbyterian Divines for review of the Book of Common Prayer. 1661.
Gregory, St. Sacramentary [a.d. 590]. Menard's ed.
GresweU, Edw. Fasti Temp. Cathol. 1852.
Origines Kalendariie Italicfe. 1854.
W. P. Commentary on the Burial Service. 1836.
Gu^ranger, Prosp. Institutions Liturgiques. 1840-51.
Guericke, H. G. F. Manual of the Antiquities of the Church. Morrison's translation. 1851.
Hale, Archd. W. W. Precedents, 1475-1640. 1847.
Hallier, Fr. de. De Sacris Ordinationibus. 1636.
Hammond, C. E. Liturgies, Eastern and Western. 1878.
Harvey, W. W. History and Theology of the Three Creeds. 1854.
Hermannus, Archiep. Colon. Simplex, ac Pia Deliberatio. 1545.
Daye's translation [edd. 1547, 1548].
Heurtley, C. A. Harmonia Symbolica ; a Collection of Creeds. 1858.
Heylin, P. History of the Reformation. Ecc. Hist. Soc. 1849.
Hey wood, J. Documents relating to the Act of Uniformity. 1862.
Hickes, G. Letters between him and a Popish Priest [Lib. Ecc. Cath. Dunelm. ex dono Audoris]. 1705.
Hierurgia Anglicana. 1848.
Hittorpius, M. De Divinis Officiis. Cologne, 1568.
Hope, A. J. B. Worship of the Church of England. 1875.
Jacobson, Bishop. Illustrations of the History of the Prayer Book. 1874.
Jebb, J. Choral Service. 1843.
Ritual Law and Custom of the Church Universal ; a Sermon. 1866.
Jerome, St. Comes seu Lectionarium. Pamelius's ed. Cologne, 1571.
Kalendar of the English Church. 1865-6.
a List of authorities.
xvn
Keble, J. Eucharistical Adoration. 1857.
Keeling, W. Liturgise Britannicae. 1851.
Kennett, Bishop. A Register, Ecclesiastical and Civil, from the Eestoration. 1728.
Landon, E. H. Manual of Councils. 1846.
Ecclesiastical Dictionary. 1849.
Lathbury, T. History of the Convocation. 1853.
Prayer Book. 1859.
Lay Folks' Mass Book. Edited by T. F. Simmons for Early Eng. Text Soc. 1879.
Leo, St. Sacramentary [a.d. 451]. Muratori's ed. 1748.
L'Estrange, H. Alliance of Divine Offices [a.d. 1690]. Ang. Cath. Lib. 1846.
Lingard, J. History and Antiquities of the Anglo-Saxon Church. 1845.
Littledale, E. F. North-side of the Altar. 1863.
On the Mked Chalice. 1863.
Liturgies, etc., of King Edward VI. Parker Soc. 1844.
etc., of Queen Elizabeth. Parker Soc. 1847.
Mabillon, J. Museum Italicum. 1687-9.
De Liturgia GaUicana. Paris, 1685.
Manuale Sarisburiense. 1498.
et Processionale Eboracense. Surtees Soc. ed. Edited by Dr. Henderson. 1875.
Martene, E. De Antiquis Ecclesise Eitibus. Antwerp, 1763-4.
Vet. Script. CoUect. Vol. VL
Maskell, W. Ancient Liturgy of the Church of England. 1846.
Dissertation on Holy Baptism. 1848.
ISIonumenta Eitualia Ecc. Ang. 1846-7.
Enquiry into the Doctrine of the Church of England on Absolution. 1849.-
Mason, F. Vindicife Ecc. Anglic, sive de legitime ejusdem Ministerio. 1625.
Massingberd, F. C. Lectures on the Prayer Book. 1864.
Meibomius, M. Antiquse Musicse Auctores Septem. 1652.
Merbecke, J. Common Prayer Noted. 1550.
Micrologus [Johannis, Episcopi, thirteenth century. MaskeU's date, 1080]. Pamelius's ed. Antwerp, 15G5. [Bibl.
Max. Lugd. xviii. 469.]
Mlrroure of our Ladye. 1530. [Cosin's copy, Cosin's Lib. Durham, H. ii. 24.]
Edited by J. H. Blunt for Early Eng. Text Soc. 1873.
Missal, Salisbury. Paris, 1514. [Cosin's copy, Cosin's Lib. Durham, D. iii. 12.]
Burntisland, 1861-74.
York. Edited by Dr. Henderson for Surtees Soc. 1874.
Hereford. Edited by Dr. Henderson. 1874.
Irish. Edited by F. E. Warren. 1879.
Morinus, J. De Sacris Ecclesiaj Ordinationibus. 1655.
Muratori, L. A. Liturgia Romana Vetus. 1748.
Neale, J. M., and Littledale, R. F. Commentary on the Psalms. 1860-71.
Primitive Liturgies. 1859.
Neale, J. M. Essays on Liturgiology and Church Hist. 2nd ed., 1867.
Introduction to the History of the Holy Eastern Church. 1850.
Tetralogia Liturgica. 1849.
Nichols, W. Commentary on the Book of Common Prayer. 1710.
Nicolas, Sir N. H. Chronology of History. 1833.
Palmer, W. Origines Liturgicte. 1832.
Pamelius, J. [a.d. 1536-87]. Liturgica Latinorum. Cologne, 1571.
Parker, Archbishop. Correspondence. Parker Soc. 1853.
James. Introd. to History of Prayer Book Eevisions. 1877.
First Prayer Book of Edward VI. compared with successive Eevisions. 1877.
Perry, T. W. Historical Considerations relating to the Declaration on Kneeling. 1863.
PhiUimore, E. J. Ecclesiastical Law. 1873.
Pickering's Eeprints of the Books of Common Prayer. 7 Vols.
Pinnock, W. H. Laws and Usages of the Church and Clergy. 1855-6.3.
Pontifical, Exeter [Lacy's]. Edited by Ralph Barnes. 1847.
xviii a list Of authorities.
Pontifical, York [Egbert's]. Edited by W. Green well for Surtees Soc. 1853.
York [Bainbridge's]. Edited by Dr. Henderson for Surtees Soc. 1875.
Pontificals of Salisbury and Bangor.
Pontificale Komanum. See Catalanus.
Position of the Priest at the Altar. [By J. H. Blunt.] 1858.
PouUain, V. L'Ordre des Pri^res, etc. London, 1552.
Prideaux, H. Validity of the Orders of the Church of England. 1688.
Primers, Three, of 1535, 1539, 1545. 1848.
Private Prayers of the Eeign of Queen Elizabeth. Parker Soc. 1851.
Procter, F. History and Rationale of the Prayer Book. 1857. 15th ed., 1880.
Psalter, Anglo-Saxon and Early English. Surtees Soc. 1843-7.
Translation of Sarum, with Explanatory Notes and Comments. [J. D. Chambers.] 1852.
Purchas, J. Directorium Anglicanum. 1858.
2nd ed., edited by F. G. Lee. 1865.
Pusey, E. B. The Real Presence the Doctrine of the English Church. 1857.
Scriptural Views of Holy Baptism. 1836.
Quignonez, Cardinal. Brev. Kom. [Reformed Roman Breviary]. Lyons, 1543. [Edd. 1535-6 to 1568.]
Eenaudot, E. Liturg. Orient. Collectio. 1716.
Rock, D. Hierurgia. 1851.
Church of our Fathers. 1849-53.
Scudamore, W. E. Notitia Eucharistica. 2nd ed., 1876.
The Communion of the Laity. 1855.
Sparrow, Bishop. Collection of Ai-ticles, Injunctions, etc. 1671.
Rationale of the Prayer Book.
Stephens, A. ,1. Edition of Sealed Book of Common Prayer. Ecc. Hist. Soc. 1849-54.
Book of Common Prayer, from the Irish MS. in the Rolls Office, Dublin. Ecc. Hist. Soc. 1849-50.
Strype, J. Memorials of Cranmer. Ecc. Hist. Soc.'-s edit., 1848-54.
Taylor, Bishop. Collection of Offices. 1658.
Thomasius, J. M. Opera. 1747-69.
Thomassin, L. Discipline de I'Eglise, etc. 1679-81.
Thomson, Eb. Vindication of the Hymn Te Deum Laudamus. 1858.
Thrupp, J. F. Introduction to the Psalms. 1860.
Trombellus, J. C. Tractatus de Sacramentis. 1769-83.
Tyler, J. E. Meditations from the Fathers illustrating the Prayer Book. 1849.
Walafridus Strabo [a.d. 830]. De Rebus Ecc. Cologne, 1568. [Bibl. Patr. Max. Lfigd. xy. 181.J
Warren, C. The Ministry of the Word for Absolution, in answer to Maskell. 1849.
The Lord's Table the Christian Altar. 1843.
Whcatley, C. Rational Illustration of the Book of Common Prayer. Corrie's ed., 1858.
Wilberforce, R. I. The Doctrine of the Holy Eucharist. 1853.
WUkins, D. Concilia. 1737.
Williams, Isaac. The Psalms interpreted of Christ. 1864.
Zaccaria, F. A. Bibliotheca Ritualis. 1776-81.
CHKONOLOGICAL TABLE.
Liturgy of Cassian and Leo ........
Sacramentary of St. Leo ........
Gelasiua . . . . . . . .
Gregory ........
St. Augustine's reidsed Liturgy of Britain ......
Salisbttry Use of St. Osmund ........
English Prymer. [Maskell's Mon. Rit. Ang. ii.] .....
Liber Festivalis. [A book of mediseval English Homilies, printed by Caxton.]
Salisbury Breviary "reformed." [1st ed.] ........
Mirror of our Lady. [A translation of and commentary on the Daily Offices of Syon and the Mass.]
Salisbury Breviary " reformed." [2nd ed.] ........
Missal " reformed " .
English Psalters printed ..........
Marshall's Prymer ...........
English Epistles and Gospels printed ........
Hilsey's Prymer ...........
The " Great Bible " set up in Churches as the " Authorized Version " . . . .
Salisbury Use further reformed, and adopted (by order of the Convocation) throughout the Province of
bury ............
Committee of Convocation commissioned to revise Service-books .....
English Litany ordered for use in Churches ........
King Henry VIII.'s Prymer ..........
Archbishop Hermann's Consultation [German, 1543; Latin, 1545], printed in English, 1547; reprinted
Edward VL's First Year ........
Second Year .......
A.D.
circ. 420
451
492
590
ciic. 600
. 1085
circ. 1390
. 1483
. 1516
. 1530
. 1531
. 1533
1534-40
1535
1538-48
. 1539
. 1540
Canter-
1541
1542-49
June 11, 1544
1545
1543
Jan. 28, 1547, to Jan. 27, 1548
Jan. 28, 1548, to Jan. 27, 1549
. March 8, 1548
English Order of Communion added to Latm Mass .....
Book of Common Prayer. [First Book of Edward VL] —
Submitted to Convocation (by Committee of 1542-49)
Laid before Parliament as part of Act of Uniformity [2 and 3 Edw. VI. c. 1]
Passed by the House of Lords ditto ditto
Commons ditto ditto
Printed ready for circulation . ,....■
Received Royal Assent as part of Act of Uniformity [2 and 3 Edw. VI. c. 1]. [Prolxibly at prorogation of
Parliament on .
Taken into general use ....
English Ordinal ......
Book of Common Prayer. [Second Book of Edwartl VL] —
[Committee of Convocation commissioned, probably .
Passed through Parliament as part of Act of Uniformity
Ordered to be taken into use from .....
Edward VI. died .....-.•
Acts of Uniformity (including Prayer Books) repealed by 1 Mary, sess. ii. c. 2
. and G Edw. VI. c. 1]
. Nov. 24, 1548
. Dec. 9, 1548
. Jan. 15, 1549
. Jan. 21, 1549
. March 7, 1549
March 14, 1549]
. June 9, 1549
March 1650
. 1551]
. April 6, 1552
. Nov. 1, 1552
. July 6, 1553
Oct. 1553
XX
Cf)ronoloffical Cable.
Queen Elizabetk's Accession ......
Edward VI.'s Second Book restored (with some alterations) by 1 Eliz. c. 2
Queen Elizabeth's Latin Book of Common Prayer
Commission to revise Calendar and Lessons .
Hampton Court Conference ....
Scottish Book of Common Prayer
Prayer Book suppressed by " ordinance " of Parliament
Use of Prayer Book began to be revived
Savoy Conference .....
of Common Prayer [that now in use] —
Commission to the Convocations to revise it .
Eevision completed by Convocations .
Approved by King in Council
Passed House of Lords as part of Act of Uniformity [14 Car. IL e. 4]
Commons ditto ditto
Received Royal Assent ditto ilitto
Taken into general use .....
Adopted by Irish Convocation ....
Standard copies certified under Great Seal
Embodied in Irish Act of Uniformity [17 and 18 Car. ll. c. 6j
William the Third's Commission to review Prayer Book
Revised Calendar authorized by 24 Geo. II. c. 23 .
American Book of Common Prayer .....
Revised Tables of Lessons authorized by 34 and 35 Vict. c. 37
Shortened Order for Morning and Evening Prayer authorized by 35 and 36
Vict, c.
35
A.D.
. Nov. 17, 1558
. June 24, 1559
1560
. Jan. 22, 1561
Jan. 14-18, 1604
1637
J.m. 3, 1645
April 1660
April 15 to July 24, 1661
June 10, 1661
Dec. 20, 1661
Feb. 24, 1662
April 0, 1662
May 8, 1662
May 19, 1662
Aug. 24, 1662
Nov. 11, 1662
Jan. 5, 1663
June 18, 1666
1689
. 1752
1785-89
. 1871
. 1872
AN
HI8T0EICAL INTEODUOTION
TO THE
PRAYER BOOK.
n~^HE Book of Common Prayer remained altogether unaltered for more than two centuries, the new
Tables of Lessons of 1871 being the first change made since it was revised, after the great
persecution of the Church by the Puritans, in 1G61. But the various stages of its developement from
the ancient formularies of the Church of England extended through a period of one hundred and fifty
years ; and the history of that developement is of the highest imjDortance to those who wish to under-
stand and use the Prayer Book, as well as of considerable interest to all from the fact of its being an
integral part of our national history.
The Church of England has had distinctive formularies of its own as far back as the details of its
customs in respect to Di\'ine Worship can be traced. The earliest history of these formularies is
obscure, but there is good reason to believe that they were derived, through Lyons, from the great
patriarchate of Ephesus, in which St. John spent the latter half of his life. There was an intimate
connection between the Churches of France and England in the early ages of Christianity, of which we
still have a memorial in the ancient French saints of our Calendar ; and when St. Augustine came to
England, he found the same rites used as he had observed in France, remarking upon them that they
differed in many particulars from those of Eome. It is now a well-established opinion that this ancient
Galilean Liturgy came from Ephesus.^ But there can be no doubt that several waves of Christianity,
perhaps of Apostolic Christianity, passed across our island ; and the Ephesine or Johannine element in
the ancient Prayer Books of the Church of England probably represents but the strongest of those
waves, and the predominating influence which mingled with itself others of a less powerful character.
It was in the sixth century [a.d. 596] that the great and good St. Augustine undertook his
missionary work among the West Saxons. The mission seems to have been sent from g^. Augustine and
Rome by Gregory the Great under the impression that the inhabitants of England the old EngUsH
were altogether heathen ; and if he or Augustine were not unacquainted with what ^^'
St. Chrysostom, St. Jerome, and others had said respecting the early evangelization of Britain, they
had evidently concluded that the Church founded in Apostolic times was extinct. When Augustine
arrived in England, he found that, although the West Saxons were heathen, and had driven the
Church into the highlands of Wales by their persecution, yet seven bishops remained alive, and a large
number of clergy, who had very strong \iews about the independence of the Church of England, and
were unprepared to receive the Roman missionary except on terms of equality. The chief difficulty
felt by St. Augustine arose from the difference just refen-cd to between the religious system of Italy, the
Church of which was the only one the missionary priests were at that time acquainted with, and the
systems of France and England. This difficulty, a great one to a man so conscientious and simple-minded,
he submitted to Gregory in the form of questions, and among them was the following one on the
subject of Divine Worship : " Whereas the Faith is one, why are the customs of Churches various ?
and why is one manner of celebrating the Holy Communion used in the holy Roman Church, and
> See Paliieh's OrUjines Lilimj. i. 15.3. NEALEaiul Forbes' Oallkan Liturgies. FnvEMAti's Principles of Divine Service, ii. 399.
an IDistorical S'ntromiction
another in that of the Gauls ? " This diversity becomes even more prominent in the words which
Augustine addressed to the seven Bishops of the ancient Church of England, when they met in
conference at the place afterwards called St. Augustine's Oak. "You act," said he, "in many
particulars contrary to our customs, or rather, to the customs of the universal Church, and yet, if you
will comply with me in these three points, \iz. to keep Easter at the due time; to perform the
administration of baptism, by which we are bom again to God, according to the custom of the holy
Roman and Apostolic Church ; and jointly with us to preach the Word of God to the English nation,
we will readily tolerate all your other customs, though contrary to our own." The answer of St.
Gregory contained wise and Catholic advice ; and to it we owe, under Providence, the continued use
of an independent form of Divine Worship in the Church of England from that day to the present.
" You, my brother," said Gregory, " are acquainted with the customs of the Roman Church in which
you were brought up. But it is my pleasure that if you have found anything either in the Roman
or the Galilean or any other Church which may be more acceptable to Almighty God, you carefully
make choice of the same ; and sedulously teach the Church of the English, which is at present new in
the Faith, whatsoever you can gather from the several Churches. For things are not to be loved for
the sake of places, but places for the sake of good things. Select, therefore, from each Church those
things that are pious, religious, and connect; and when you have made these up into one body, instil
tliis into the minds of the English for their Use." [Greg. Opera, ii. 1151, Bened. ed. ; Bede's Eccl.
Hist. L 27.] The Liturgy of the Roman Church spoken of in this reply is represented by the ancient
Sacramentary of St. Gregory, to which such frequent references are given in the following pages : that
of the Galilean Church is also partly extant,^ and has been shewn (as was mentioned before) to be
derived from the Liturgy of the Church of Ephesus. The words " any other Church " might be
supposed to refer to an independent English Liturgy, but there is no reference to any in the question
to which Gregory is replying, and he evidently knew nothing of England except through Augustine.
From other writers it seems that the Liturgy of England or Britain before this time had been the
same with that of France ; but the native Clergy always alleged that their distinctive customs were
derived from St. John.
Being thus advised by St. Gregory, the holy missionary endeavoured to deal as gently as possible
with those whose customs of Divine Worship differed from his own ; but his prepossessions in favour
of the Roman system were very strong, and he used all his influence to get it universally adopted
throughout the country.
Uniformity in all details was not, however, attainable. The national feeling of the ancient Church
steadily adhered to the ancient rite for many years ; while the feeling of the Church founded by St.
Augustine was in favour of a rite more closely in agreement with that of Rome. As collision was the
first natural consequence of this state of things, so some degree of amalgamation as naturally followed
in course of time ; that which was local, or national, mingling with that which was foreign in the
English devotional system, as it did in the English race itself Some attemi:)ts were made, as in the
Council of Cloveshoo [a.D. 747], to enforce the Roman Liturgy upon all the dioceses of the country,
but it is certain that the pre^nious devotional customs of the land had an exceedingly tenacious hold
upon the Clergy and the people, and that no efforts could ever wholly extirpate them.-
At the time of the Conquest another vigorous attempt was made to secure uniformity of Divine
Service throughout the country, and with the most pious intentions. St. Osmund, Bishop of Salisbury,
The "Use "of Sails- ^^d Chancellor of England,^ collecting together a large body of skilled clergy,
*""^- remodelled the Offices of the Church, and left behind him the famous Portiforium
or Breviary of Sarum, containing the Daily Services; together with the Sarum Missal, containing
the Communion Service ; and, probably, the Sarum Manual, containing the Baptismal and other
" occasional " Offices. These, and some other Service-books, constituted the " Sarum Use," that
is, the Prayer Book of the diocese of Salisbury. It was first adopted for that diocese in a.d. 108.5, and
' See the names Menard, Muratori, and Mabillon, in the
List of Authorities. The Gregorian and Gallican Liturgies
are also printed in Hammond's Liturgies, Eastern and Western,
Oxford, 1878.
' See Maskell's Ajicient Liturgy of the Church of England ,
Preface, p. liv.
Bishop of Salisbury [a.d. 1078-1099] after the foundation of
that diocese by the consolidation of the Sees of Ramsbury
and Sherborne in a.d. 1058 and 1075. St. Osmund was tlie
principal builder of the Cathedral of Old Sarum, a small
fortified hill a few miles distant from the present city. This
cathedral was taken down, and that of New Sarum, or
' St. Osmund, who was canomzed in a.d. 1456, was a ] Salisbury, the existing cathedral, built in the place of it, in
nephew of Wilham the Conqueror, being the son of the king's | a.d. 12*5: the remains of St. Osmund being removed
sister Isabella and Henry, Count of S('ez. He was tlie second ' thither.
to tfje Iprapcc TBoofe
was introduced into other parts of England so generally that it became the principal devotional Kule
of the Church of England, and continued so for more than four centuries and a half: " the Church of
Salisbury," says a writer of the year 125G, " being conspicuous above all other Churches like the sun
in the heavens, diffusing its light everywhere, and supplying their defects." ^ Other Uses continued to
hold their place in the dioceses of Lincoln, Hereford, and Bangor, and through the greater part of the
Province of York ; though in the diocese of Durham the Salisbury system was followed. At St. Paul's
Cathedral, and j^erhaps throughout the diocese of London, there was an independent Use until A.D.
1414. For about a hundred and fifty years before the Prayer Book era there was some displacement
of the Sarum Use by Roman customs in Monasteries, Monastic Churches (though not at Durham), and
perhaps in Parish Churches served by Monastic clergy : but the " Use " itself was not superseded to
any great extent even in these. The Salisbury Use, that of York, and that of Hereford, are well
known to modem ritualists." They appear to be traceable to a common origin ; but they differ in so
many respects from the Roman Bre\aary, and even from the Missal (with which a closer agreement
might have been expected), that the}' clearly derive their common origin from a source independent of
the Roman Church. And, whatever quarter they may have been derived from in the first instance, it
is equally clear that the forms of Divine Service now known to us under these names represent a
system which was naturalized so many ages ago, that it had been entitled to the name of an indepen-
dent English rite for at least a thousand years.
During all this time the public Services of the Church were said in Latin, for Latin had been
Quring some ages the most generally understood language in the world, and was spoken vernacularly
in France, Spain, Portugal, and Italy (the modem languages of all which countries were formed from
it) down to a comparatively late time, as it is now spoken in Hungary. In England the Latin
language was almost as familiar to educated persons as it was upon the Continent ; but the poor and
uneducated knew no other tongue than their native English, and for these the Church did the best that
could be done to provide some means by which they might make an intelligent use of Divine Service.
From the earliest j^eriods we find injunctions imj^osed upon the Clergy that they should be
careful to teach the people the Creed, the Lord's Prayer, and the Ten Commandments in their own
tongiie. Thus, in A.D. 740 there was a canon of Egbert, ArchbishojD of York, to the effect, " that every
priest do with great exactness instil the Lord's Prayer and Creed into the people committed to him,
and shew them to endeavour after the knowledge of the whole of religion, and the practice of
Christianity." '' About the same time, in the Southern Province, it is ordered " that they instil the
Creed into them, that they may know what to believe, and what to hope for." * Two centuries later
there is a canon of .ZElfric, Archbishop of Canterbury, enjoining the clergy to " speak the sense of the
Gospel to the people in English, and of the Pater noster, and the Creed, as often as he can, for the
inciting of the people to know their belief and retaining their Christianity." ^ Similar injunctions are
to be found in the laws of Canute in the eleventh century, the constitutions of Archbishop Peckham
in the thirteenth, and in the canons of many diocesan synods, of various dates in the media3val period.
Many expositions of the Creed, Lord's Prayer, Ten Commandments, and other principal formula?, are
also to be found in English, and these give testimony to the same anxious desire of the Church to
make the most use possible of the language spoken by the poor of the day." Interlinear translations
of some, at least, of the Offices were also provided, especially of the Litany, just as the English and
Welsh Prayer Book, or the Latin and English JMissal of the Roman Catholics, are printed in parallel
columns in modern times.
But in days when books were scarce, and when few could read, little could be done towards givino-
to the people at large this intelligent acquaintance with the Services except by oral instruction of the
kind indicated. Yet the writing-rooms of the Mona.stcries did what they could towards multiplying
books for the purpose ; and some provision was made, even for the poorest, by means of horn-books,
on which the Lord's Prayer, the Creed, and the Angelic Salutation were written. The following is an
' At an even earlier date [a. B. 1200] the chronicler Brompton » John.son's ^nj. Canons, i. 18C.
flaysthattheCustom-bookof Salisburywasusedalmostallover \ * Ibid. 248-
England, Wales, and Ireland. [BuiiMrroN's C//roH. 977.] ■ ^. • .
- These three English Uses alone were of sulliiient import-
ance to ensure the dignity of appearing in print while they
were living rites. Hereford barely secnred that honour, while
Salisbury is represented by at least a hundred editions ; tlie
Sarum Breviary alone having been printed some forty or fifty ; English instead of Frencl:
times between 1483 and 1557.
Iljid. 398.
" It must be remembered that English wa.s not spoken
universally by the upper classes for some centuries after the
C'on(iucst. In 13(i2 an Act of Parliament was passed enjoin-
ing all schoolmasters to teach their scholars to translate into
an I^i0torical SntvoDiiction
engraving made from one of two which were found by the present writer under the floor of Over
Church, near Cambridge, in 1857. It is of a late date, and has had " In the Name of the Father, and
of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost," in the place of the Angelic Salutation ; but it is given as an
illustration of the traditional practice, and because it is of special interest from being found in a
church.
II
iii:ii
b^'lH.
\, , tnrvxfti!
i-i'/ 'risiau
printer, at whose press many of the Breviaries and Missals
used in England were printed. Tliey say that, among other
books, he had printed English Prymers for forty years, that
is, from the end of the fifteenth century. [State Pavers Dom
Hen. VIII. i. 589.] -^ '
to tt)C Praper TBoofe.
THE LORDS PRAYEE IN ENGLISH OF THE SEVENTH
CENTURY.
Fader iisser thu arth in Heofnas sic gehalgad noma
thin to cymeth ric thin, sie -willo thin suag is in Heofne
and in Eortho. Hlaf userne ofer^^■istlic sel us to diBg,
and forgef us scyltha usra sua; use forgefon scylgum
usum. And ne inlead usith in costnunge. Ah gefrig
usich from yfle.
THE CREED IN ENGLISH OF THE NINTH CENTUEV.
Ic gelji'e on God Freder rehnihtigne, Scyppend heo-
fonan and eorthan ; And on Hfehiiid Crist, Sunu his
anlican, Drihten urne ; Se the woes geacnod of tham
Halgan Gaste, Acrenned of Marian tham mcedene ;
Gethrowad under tham Pontiscan Pilate, Gerod faestnad.
Dead and bebyrged ; He nither astah to hel warum ;
Tham thriddan diege he aras fram deadum ; He astah
to heofonum ; He sit to swythran hand God Fseder
waes ielmihtigan ; Thonan toweard deman tha cucan
and tha deadan. Ic gelyfe Tha halgan gelathunge riht
gelyfdan ; Halgana gemoenysse ; And forgyfnysse synna ;
FLnesces asriste ; And thaet ece life. Si hit swa.
To these early specimens of devotioual English may be added a few taken out of a volume of
considerable size, the Primer which was in common use about a hundred years before the present
English Prayer Book was constructed.^
iust werkis : jyue to thi seruantis pees that the world
may not jeue, that in our heartis jouun to thi com-
mandementis, and the drede of enemyes putt awei, owre
tymes be pesible thurj thi defeudyng. Bi oure lord
iesu crist, thi sone, that with thee lyueth and regneth
in the unitie of the hooli goost god, bi all worldis of
worldis. So be it.
THE lord's prayer IN ENGLISH OF THE THIRTEENTH
CENTURY.
Fader oure that art in heve, i-halgeed bee thi nome,
i-cume thi kinereiche, y-worthe thi wylle also is in
hevene so be on erthe, oure iche-dayes bred {if us to day,
and forjif us oure gultes, also we forjifet oure gultare,
and ne led ows nowth into fondingge, auth ales ows of
harme. So be it.
THE CREED IN ENGLISH OF THE THIRTEENTH CENTURY.
Hi true in God, Fader Hal-michttende, That makede
heven and herdeth ; And in Jhesu Krist, is ane lepi
Sone, Hure Laverd ; That was bigotin of the Hali Gast,
And born of the mainden Marie ; Pinid under Punce
Pilate, festened to the rode, Ded, and dulvun ; Licht
in til helle ; The thride dai up ras fra dede to live ;
Steg intil hevenne; Sitis on his Fadir richt hand, Fadir
alwaldand ; He then sal cume to deme the quike and
the dede. Hy troue hy theli Gast; And hely * *
kirke ; The samninge of halges ; Forgifnes of sinnes ;
Uprisigen of fleyes ; And life withuten ende. Amen.
Pater Noster.
OURE fadir, that art in heuenes, halewid be thi
name : thy rewme come to thee : be thi wille do
as in heueue and in erthe : oure eche dales breed 5yue
us to day : and forjyue us oure dettis, as and we forjeuen
to oure dettouris : and ne lede us into temptacioun: but
delyuere us fro yuel. So be it.
Dumitie, Labia.
Lord, thou schalt opyne myn lippis.
And my mouth schal schewe thi prisyng.
God, take heede to myn help :
Lord, hiie thee to helpe me.
Glorie be to the fadir and to the sone and to the
holy goost :
As it was in the bygynnyng and now and euer and
in to the worldis of worldis. So be it.
Credo in.
IBTLEUE in god, fadir almy5ti, makere of heuene
and of erthe : and in iesu crist the sone of him,
oure lord, oon aloone : which is conceyued of the hooli
gost : born of mario maiden : suifride passioun undir
pounce pilat : crucified, deed, and biried : he wente doun
to hellis : the thriddo day he roos njen fro deede : he
steij to heuones : ho sittith on the rijt sydo of god the
fadir ahny?ti : thcnus he is to come for to dome the
quyke and deede. I beleue in the hooli goost : feith
of hooli chirche : communyngc of seyntis : forjyuenesse
of synnes : ajenrisyng of fleish, and euerlastynge lyf.
So be it.
Preie we. For the pees.
Deiis a quo.
God, of whom ben hooli desiris, rijt councels and
[Prai/er fur the Clergy. '\
ALMYGHTI god, euerlastynge, that aloone doost
■' ^ many wondres, schewe the spirit of heelful grace
upon bisschopes thi seruantis, and vpon alle the con-
gregacion betake to hem : and jeete in the dewe of thi
blessynge that thei plese euermore to the in trouthe.
Bi crist oure lord. So be it.
[Collect fur the Annunciation.^
LORD, we bisechen helde yn thi grace to oure
inwittis, that bi the message of the aungel we
knowe the incarnacioun of thi sone iesu crist, and by
his passioun and cross be ledde to the glorie of his
resurreccioun. Bi the same iesu crist oure lord, that
with thee lyueth and regneth in oonhede of the hooly
goost, god, bi alle worldis of worldis. So be it.
[Collect for Whitsun Bay.]
GOD, that taujtist the hertia of thi feithful seruantis
bi the lijtnynge of the hooli goost : graunte us
to sauore rijtful thingis in the same goost, and to be
ioiful euermore of his counfort. Bi crist our lorde. So
be it.
[Colled for Trinity Sunday.]
EUERLASTYNGE alrayjti god that 5ave us thi
seruantis in knowlechj-nge of verrei feith to
' It will be observed that Latin titles are prefixed to these,
as is still done with the Psalms in the Prayer Book. These
titles were a guide to the ear when the prayers and psalms
were being said or sung in Latin.
an ii)i0toncal Jntromiction
knowe the glorie of the endeles trinite, and iu the
mijt of mageste to worchipe thee in oonliede : we
bisechen that bi the sadness of the same feith we be
kept and defendid euermore fro alle aduersitiees. Bi
crist.
\C'ollect /or St. Michad and all Aiigels.'\
GOD, that in a merueilous ordre ordeynedist seruisys
of aungcls and of men, graunte thou mercifulli
that cure liif be defendid in erthe bi hem that stondcn
nyj euermore seruynge to thee in heuvene. Bi crist.
The ancient formularies had, however, by change of circumstances, become unsuitable in several
respects for the Church of England. They had grown into a form in which they were extremely well
adapted (from a ritual point of view) for the use of religious communities, but were far too complex
for that of parochial congregations. When monasteries were abolished it was found that the devotional
system of the Church must be condensed if it was to be used by mixed congregations, and by those
who were not specially set apart for that life of rule and continual worship for which monastic com-
munities were intended. The Latin Services had, indeed, never been familiar to the people of England,
any more than they are to the Continental laity at the present day. In the place of Service-books the
laity were provided with devotional expositions of the Services ; sometimes in English rhyme, like
the " Lay Folk's Mass Book,"i and sometimes in prose, like " Our Lady's Mirror."^ When manuscript
English Bibles became common in the fourteenth century, they usually contained a list of the Epistles
and Gospels, and similar lists are also found in a separate form.^ Such helps and guides would go far
to remedy the inconvenience of a Latin Service to those who could or would use them : but probably
the number of such persons was never very large.
There was, indeed, a popular service which was held about nine o'clock iu the morning on Sundays
and Festivals, consisting of the Aspersion with blessed, or holy, water, followed by the Bidding of
Bedes, and a Sermon or Homily ; and in this service the vernacular was used long before the disuse of
Latin. The Aspersion Service, as given, with the musical notation, in a Breviary ^ belonging to the
Dean and Chapter of Salisbury, is as follows : —
" Piemember your promys made in baptym.
And chrystys mercyfull bloudshedyng.
By the wyche most holy sprynklj-ng.
Off all youre syns youe haue fre perdun.
Haue mercy uppon me oo god.
Affter thy grat mercy.
Remember your promys made in baptym.
And chrystys mercyfull bloudshedyng.
By the wycho most holy sprynklyng.
Off all youre syns youe haue fre perdun.
And acordyng to the multytude of thy mercys.
Do awey my wyckydnes.
Remember your promys made in baptym.
And chrystys mercyfull bloudshedyng.
By the wyclie most holy sjirynklyng.
Off all youre syns youe haue fre perdun.
Glory be to the father, and to the sun, and to the holy goost.
As hyt was yn the begynyng so now and euer and yn the world off worlds. So be hytt.
By the wyche most holy sprynklyng.
(JfT all youre .syn.s youe haue fre perdun.""
' The following is the title of one of these books, ami a
sijecimen of the references is annexed : —
" Here begyiuieth a rule that tellith in whiche cliapitriy of the bible ye
may fynde the lessouns. pistlis and gospels, tliat ben red in the churche
aftir the vse of salisburi : markid witli lettris of the a. b. c. at tiie
begynnynge of the chapitris toward the niyddil or eende : aftir the ordre as
the lettris stonden in the a. b. c. first ben sett sundaies and feriais togidere :
and aftir that the sanctorum, the propre and comyn togider of al the yeer :
and thanne last the commemoraciouns : that is clepid the temporal of
al the yere. p'irst is written a clause of the begynnynge of the pistle and
gospel, and a clause of i\iG endynge therof. "
' This commentary on the Mass was published by the Early
English Text Society in 1S79 under tlie following title ; " The
Lay Folk's JIass Book ; or. The Manner of liearing Mass, with
Rubrics and Devotions for the People." It is admirably edited
by the Rev. T. F. Simmons, Canon of York and Rector of
Dalton Holme. The book is a mediaeval "Companion to the
Altar," and was written in the twelfth century.
' This was written aljout a.d. 14.30, and printed in .\. n.
1530. It was reprinted by the Early English Text Society
in IS?.*?, with the title, " The Myroure of oure Ladye, con-
taining a devotional treatise on Divine Service, with a trans-
lation of the Offices used by the Sisters of the Brigittine
Monastery of Sion at Islewortli, during the fifteenth and
sixteenth centuries. Edited from the black-letter text of 1530,
with Introduction and Notes, by John Henry Blunt,"
etc. It is a commentary upon the Hours, or Services
for every day of the Week, and upon the Mass : the whole
of the former, and the laymen's part of the latter, being
translated.
In the library of St. John's College, Oxford, there is also a
Processionale [MS. 167] with English rubrics, which once
belonged to Sion, and was written in the middle of the
fifteenth century. {Mirror, Introd. p. xliv. ]
■The first] Kora-xiii.c.
snnenday Vj,jttl,eu xxi.
of aduent. \
d. we knowen this ciirfc in tlie lord Ills
tyme. ct.
n. whanne ihs cam ende. osanna in high
nygh. _ thingis."
■• This Breviary, perhaps the finest which has been pre-
served, belonged to the Parish Church of Arliugham in
Gloucestershire, then in the Diocese of Worcester, and was
written in the early part of the fifteenth century. Tlie
Aspersion Service was inserted at a later time, the writing
being dated by experts of tlie highest authority as belonging
to the middle of the century, from a.d. 1440 to 1460. There
is a critical paper on this Aspersion by Mr., now Bishop,King-
don, in the Wiltshire Archccolorjical Magazine for 1879, pages
62-70, with a photograph of the words and music.
^ At a later date tlir .\spersiou was followed by the dia-
to tf)C Iprapcr Xoofe.
While this anthem was being sung the priest, with the aqiia3-bajuhis, or holy water-bearer, and
the choir walked in procession down the nave of the church, the former sprinkling the congregation
with the water ; and it is probable that the whole of the fifty-first Psalm was sung. After this followed
the Bidding Prayer in English, several Collects in Latin, and then the Sermon.
But although this English Service was evidently in very general use, it does not seem as if the
idea of entirely Vernacular Services spread very widely among the clergy and people of England until
after the dissolution of the monasteries. Then the gradual but slow approximation to such a system
received a great impetus, and Latimer found a very hearty response in the minds of the clergy when,
speaking of baptism in his sermon before the Convocation of A.D. 1536, he exclaimed, " Shall we ever-
more in ministering it speak Latin, and not English rather, that the people may know what is said
and done ?" [Latimer's Sermons, i. 52, ed. 1824!.] The assent to this change was in fact so unanimous
among the clergy that Archbishop Cranmer wrote to Queen Mary respecting the Committee appointed
for the revision of the Services by Henry VIII., that although it was composed of men who held
different opinions, they "agreed without controversy (not one saying contrary) that the Service of the
Church ought to be in the mother tongue." [Jenkyns' Granmer's Rem. i. 375.] Ridley also writes
to his chaplain that he had conferred with many on the subject, and "never found man (so far as I do
remember), neither old nor new, gospeller nor papist, of what judgment soever he was, in this thing
to be of a contrary opinion." [Ridley's Works, p. 340.]
With this general inclination of the national mind towards the use of the national language alone
in Divine Service there arose also that necessity for condensed services which has previously been
referred to. There are no means of deciding how far the original Use of Salisbury differed from that
which is known to us. The copies remaining belong to a much later period than the eleventh century,
and there is reason to think that some accretions gathered around the ancient devotions of the Church
of England from the prevalence of Continental influences during the reigns of the Norman and
Angevin kings, and from the great increase of monastic establishments : the shorter and more primi-
tive form of responsive public service being found insufficient, especially for those who formed them-
selves into societies for the purpose of carrying on an unceasing round of prayer and praise in the
numerous Minsters which then covered the face of our land. But now that the " religious " of the
Church were to be a separate body no longer. Divine Providence led her to feel the way gradually
towards a return to the eai-lier practice of Christianity ; the idea of a popular and mixed congregation
superseded that of a special monastic one ; and the daily worship being transfen'ed from the Cloister
to the Parish Church, its normal form of Common Prayer was revived in the place of the Prayers of
a class or the solitary recitation of the Parish Priest. No blame was cast upon the former system for
its complexity; but the times were changed, a new order of things was becoming established, and,
although the j)rinciples of the Church arc unchangeable, so entire a remoulding of society entailed <>f
necessity a corresponding adaptation of her devotional practice, both for the honour of God and the
good of souls, to the wants that had come to light.
Some slight attempts were made at a reformation of the Sarum Offices in editions of the Breviary
which were printed in 1516 and 1531, and a Missal of 1509 is even described as "amended." There
was little variation, indeed, from the old forms ; but there was a distinct initiation of the principles
which- were afterwards carried out more fully in the Book of Common Prayer of 1540. The rubrics
were somewhat simplified; Holy Scripture was directed to be read in order without omission ; and in
carrying out the latter direction the Lessons, which had been much shortened in actual u-se [see note
to Table of Lessons], were restored to their ancient length.
tribution of the eulogia or blessed bread. The two are
explained in the ninth of the Ten Articles of A.I>. I53fi in the
following words : "As concerning the rites and ceremonies
of Clirist's Church ; ... as sprinkling of holy water to put
us in remembrance of our Baptism, and the blond of Clirist
sprinkled for our redemption ui)on the cross ; giving of holy
bread, to put us in remembrance of the .Sacr.ament of the
altar, that all Christian men be one body mystical of Christ
as the bread is made of many grains, and yet but one loaf :
and to put us in remembr.ance of the receiving the holy sacra-
ment and body of Christ, the which we ought to receive in
right charity : which in the beginning of Christ's Church,
men did more often receive than they use nowad.ays to do."
[Lloyd's Formul. of Faith, p. 1.5.] The fourth of some
injunctions issued by the King's Visitors in .i.D. ir)48, also
orders both rites to be used every Sunday, with the words
given above. "And in like manner before the dealing of the
holy bread these wonls :
' Of Christ's body this is a token,
Winch oil the cro.ss for our sins was bniken ;
Wherefore of Ills death if yon will be partakers,
Of vice and sin ynu must bo forsakers.'
And the clerk in the like manner shall bring down the Pax,
and standing without the church door shall say boldly to the
people these words : 'This is a token of joyful peace, which
is betwixt God and men's conscience : ('hrist alone is the
Peacemaker, Which straitly commands peace between
brother and brother.' And so long as ye iise these ceremonies,
so long sh.all ye use these significations." [Ciknkt'.s Reform.
V. 18fi, Pocock's ed. ]
8 9n ipistorical 3lntroDuction
lu 1531 this revised edition of the Salisbury Portiforium or Breviary was reprinted, and two
years later a revised Missal was published; in the latter special care being taken to provide an
apparatus for enabling the people to find out the places of the Epistles and Gospels. And though no
authorized translation of the Bible had yet been allowed by Henry VIII., Cranmer and the other
Bishops began to revise Tyndale's translation in 1534, and encouraged the issue of books containing
the Epistles and Gospels in English, of which many editions were published between 1538 and the
printing of the Prayer Book.^ A fresh impulse seems thus to have been given to the use of the old
English Prymers, in which a large portion of the Services (including the Litany) was translated into
the vulgar tongue, and also a third of the Psalms, and to which in later times the Epistles and Gospels
were added.
In 1540 the Psalter was printed by Grafton in Latin and English [Bodleian Lib., Douce BB. 71],
and there seems to have been an earlier edition of a larger size about the year 1534. The Psalter had
long been rearranged, so that the Psalms were said in consecutive order, in some churches at least,
according to our modern practice, instead of in the ancient but complex order of the Brevia-y. [See
Introd. to Psalter.]
In 1541 and 1544 other amended editions of the Salisbury Breviary were published, in the title-
pages of which it is said to be purged from many enors. By order of Convocation [March 3, 1541]
the Salisbury Use was now also adopted throughout the whole Province of Canterbury, and an uniformity
secured which had not existed since the days of Augustine. Nor is it an insignificant circumstance
that the book was now printed by Whitchurch (from whose press issued the Book of Common Prayer),
instead of being printed in Paris as formerly.
That these revisions of the ancient Service-books were steps towards a Reformed English Breviary
or Portiforium is confirmed by the course of events. Something in the nature of a confirmation is
also afforded by a comparison of these attempts with others of a similar kind which were made abroad
towards obtaining a Reformed Roman Breviary. Some years after the Convocation of the Church of
England had issued the 151G edition of the Salisbury Use, Leo X. gave directions to Zaccharia Ferreri
de Vicence, Bishojj of Guarda, in Portugal, to prepare a new version of the Breviary Hymns. This
was done, and the volume published under the authority of Clement VII. in 1525, with this prominent
announcement of a Reformed Breviary on the title-page: " Breviarium Ecclesiasticum ab eodem
Zach. Pont, longe brevius et facilius redditum et ah omni errore purgatiim propediem exibit."
The promised reform was actually effected by Cardinal Quignouez, a Spanish Bishop, and was published
under the same authority as the Hymnal, in 1535-36. But this Reformed Roman Breviary was intended
chiefly, if not entirely, for the use of the clergy and monks in their private recitations ; and its intro-
duction in some places for choir and public use eventually led to its sui)pression in 1568. No provision
whatever was made (as there had been in connection with the English reform) for adapting it to the
use of the laity. During the whole forty years of its use there is no trace of any attempt to connect
the Breviary of Quignonez with vernacular translations of Prayers or Scriptures. And, although it was
undoubtedly an initiatory step in the same direction as that taken by our own Reformers (who indeed
used the Breviary of Quignonez in their subsequent proceedings), yet it was never followed up, nor
intended to be followed up ; and the object of the Roman reform throws out in stronger light that of
the English."
A very decided advance towards the Prayer Book system had been' made in 1536, when in
the Province of York, and almost certainly in that of Canterbury also, an Archiepiscopal order was
issued that " all curates and heads of congregations, religious and other, privileged and other, shall
every holy-day read the Gospel and the Epistle of that day out of the English Bible, plainly and
distinctly ; and they that have such grace shall make some declaration either of the one or of both (if
' See the List of Printed Service-Book.s according to the
ancient Uses of the English Church, compiled by Mr. F. H.
Dickinson, and reprinted from the Ecdesiologiat of Feb. 1850.
' The Reformed Breviary of Cardinal Quignonez was begun
under Clement VII. — "ejusque hortatu et jussu " — who ex-
latest edition was printed in 1.566, and the Breviary was
suppressed in 1568. The title-pages vary, and so do the pre-
faces, and if there are not two recensions of the Breviary,
there certainly are two of the preface to it ; which, as is
shewn further on, was largely used by the writer of the Pre-
communicated Henry VIII. It was afterwards approved and face to the Prayer Book of 1549.
recommended to the clergy by Paul III. in a Bull dated in a , ForafullaccountofQuignonez's Breviary, sec Claude Jolt's
Paris edition of 1536 as issued on February 3, 1535, but in an i De verbis Usuardi Dissertaih, Senonis, 1669, pp. 93-103 ;
Antwerp black-letter edition in the Bodleian Library as issued Zaccar. Bibl. Kit. i. 110, 113, 114; Claubii Espenc^i 0pp.,
on July 3, 1536. It appears to have gone through at least | Paris, 1619, Digresx. I. xi. 156; Ciaconii Vil. Pontif. Eoman.
seventeen editions, being printed at Paris, Lyons, Antwerp, ! III. 498, Rome, 1677 ; GrEKAMr.ER's Inatit. Littirg. i. 376,
and Rome, in folio, quarto, octavo, and duodecimo. The I 383, and note B ; Christ. Eememh. Ixx. 299.
to t&e Praj>cc iBook
9
the time may serve) every holy-day." i lu 1542 a further advance was made by the Convocation,
which ordered that the Salisbury Breviary should be used all over England, a canon being passed
which enacted " that every Sunday and Holy-day throughout the year, the curate of every parish
church, after the Te Deum and Magnificat, shall openly read unto the jDeople one chapter of the
New Testament in English without exposition ; and when the New Testament is read over then to
begin the Old." -
But all the measures which had been hitherto taken by the ecclesiast'ical authorities of England
were plainly regarded as being only of a temporary nature. No more Service-books were allowed to
be printed than were absolutely necessary for the performance of Divine Worship, as it was seen that
a much more thorough alteration of them must take place, and in this session of 1542-43
Convocation entered upon that course of Liturgical revision which resulted in the Book of Common
Prayer.
At one of its early meetings the president read Letters of Business from the Crown, in which His
Majesty directed " that all Mass-books, Antiphoners, Portuises, in the Church of England should be
newly examined, cox-rected, reformed, and castigated from all manner of mention of the Bishop of
Rome's name, from all apocryphas, feigned legends, superstitious orations, collects, versicles, and
responses ; that the names and memories of all saints which be not mentioned in the Scripture or
authentical doctors should be abolished -and jJut out of the same books and calendars, and that the
service should be made out of the Scripture and other authentic doctors." [Wilkins' Concil. iii. 863.]
The Convocation at once set to work on the business thus formally placed before them by the Crown ;
and so important was it considered, that no member was allowed to absent himself from their meetings
without special leave of absence. A Committee was then appointed for carrying out the details of
this work, the original members of it being Shaxton, Bishop of Salisbury, ex officio Precentor of the
Province of Salisbury ; Goodrich, Bishop of Ely ; and six proctors of the Lower House. This Com-
mittee continued in existence for seven years, and its last work was the Book of Common Prayer
published in 1549. But for part of the seven years its jiublic action was restrained by the "Statute
of Six Articles,^ which, in point of fact, made such labours highly penal. There is good reason to
think that Henry VIII. was himself the author of this statute, and it was certainly passed by his
influence. The Bishops had vigorously opposed it in the House of Lords with an eleven days' debate,
and their experience shewed them that any reformation of the ancient services must be carried on
with extreme caution while this law was in operation under so despotic a monarch.'* But as soon as
Convocation met, after the death of Henry, a resolution was passed, " That the works of the Bishops
1 Ap.p. hEE's liijiincfioiis ill Burnetts Hist, of Reform, vi. 199,
Pocock's ed.
2 Wii.Klxs' Concil. iii. 863. It is most likely that the
Gospels and Epistles were read in Latin first and tlieu in
English. There is an interesting anonymous letter to tlie
Duke of Norfolk, ■whicli shews that Cranmer had hecome
acquainted with tliis plan in Germany : " Although I had a
chaplain yet could I not be sufl'ered to have him sing Mass,
hut w.as constrained to hear their Mass which is but one in a
Church, and that is celebrated in form following. The Priest,
in vestments after our manner, singeth everything in Latin, as
wc use, omitting sullrages. The Kpistle he rcadeth in Latin.
In the mean time the sub-deacon gocth into the pulpit and
readetli to tlie people the Epistle in their vulgar ; after they
peruse other things as our priests do. Tlien the Priest rcadeth
softly the Gospel in Latin. In the mean space the Deacon
goeth into the pulpit and readetli aloud the Gospel in the
Almaigne tongue. Jlr. Cranmer saitli it was shewed to him
that iu the Epistles and Gospels they kept not tlie order that
we do, but do peruse every d.ay one chapter of the New
Testament. Afterwards the Priest and the (piire do sing the
Credo as we do ; the secret and preface they omit, and the
Priest singeth with a high voice the words of the t'onsccration.
And after the Levation the Deacon turneth to the people,
telling to them in Ahiiaigne tongue a long process how they
should prepare themselves to the Communion of the Flesh
and Blood of Christ. And then may every man come that
listeth, without going to Confession. " This letter was written
from Nuremberg about 15.'!0. [Ellis' Ori-5
43
CO
I
c S o '^
w S ^- :::r . ^
p:5 1
i6o
Cfjc ^inor It)olj)tiaps of august.
1] Lammas Day [St. Peter ad Vincitla]. — The English
name of this day is undoiibtedly a later form of " Loaf- mass, "
from its being a feast of thanksgiving for the firstfruits of the
harvest, when bread made of the new wheat was offered at the
Mass. The blessing of new fruits took place in both Eastern
and Western Churches on tl>e 1st or the 6th of August,
and probably took the place of a heathen custom of a similar
kind. Such explanations as Vincula-mass, Lamb-mass, etc.,
cannot stand against the form of tlie word in the oldest
English, viz. Hlaf-msesse, i.e. "Loaf-mass," especially when
it is taken in connection with the blessing of firstfruits. Tlie
old saying "At latter Lammas," i.e. never, is supposed to
refer to the absence of an octave as compared with St. Peter's
Day [June 29th]. The Western Church has long kept this
day also in memory of the dedication of the famous Church
of St. Peter ad Vincula in Rome, in which one of the chains
which fell off St. Peter is said to be kept. St. Peter in
Carcere is the dedication of another church in Rome over
the Mamertine prison, where St. Peter is believed to have
been confined.
Calendars — All have St. Peter ad Vincula with the Se\'en
Maccabees, whose bodies are supposed to rest under the high
altar of tlie Church of .St. Peter ad Vincula in Rome.
Dedications of Churches — One, within the precincts of the
Tower of London, to St. Peter ad Vincula.
6] Tr.\nsfiguration' of our Lord. — This festival has long
been kept in East and West, though not always on this day,
in memory of the Transfiguration, and in the Greek Church
it is called the Feast of Tabor, while our forefathers called
it "The Overforming of our Lord on the Mount Tabor."
Pope Cali.xtus III. issued a bull for its general observance on
this day [a.d. 1457]. This festival has never ranked with
the others of our Lord, being of mutli later institution, and
its theological significance being less evident than that of the
rest. The Transfiguration was, however, a type and earnest
of our Lord's second coming in glory, and of the future
glory of the risen bodies of His members. In the Sarum
Missal the mass of the day is jii'eceded by the blessing of the
new grapes. There was a custom for tlie deacon to press a
small quantity of fresh grape-juice into tlie clialice for Mass,
probably a survival of an offering corresponding with that of
Lammas Day [August 1st]. Tlie Emperors of Constantinople,
the Patriarch, and the members of the Court used to have a
ceremonial presentation of grapes to one another in a vine-
yard. [Sar. Ep. and Gosp. : 2 St. Pet. i. 16-19. St. Matt.
xvii. 1-9.]
Calendars — All except Hereford. [Cologne, ninth centui-y,
July 27th.]
7] Name of Jesus. — This festival does not appear to have
been generally observed until the beginning of the sixteenth
century. In 149S it was kept with the Transfiguration on
August 6th. Portions of St. Bernard's well-known hjmin,
" Jesu, dulcis memoria," were sung in the Sarum Offices and
Mass. The special point which this day sets before us is,
the peculiar sanctity of that Name at whicli every knee should
bow, a sanctity in some respects analogous to that of the
Sacred Name by which God was known to His people of old,
but representing to us the love of the Saviour rather than the
self-existence of the Godhead. On the " Seven Names, " see
December 17th. [Sar. Ep. and Gosp. : Acts iv. 8-12. St.
Matt. i. 20-23.]
Calendars — Sarum, York, Aberdeen.
Represented — By the monogram ii)c or ills, Latin forms of
IHC, the beginning of the old Greek IHCOTC.
10] St. Laurence, Archdeacon of Rome and Martyr. —
Nothing is certainly known of St. Laurence's early years, but
the Spaniards claim him as their countryman. He was
ordained deacon by Sixtus or Xystus II., and soon afterwards
appointed chief of the seven deacons who served in the
Roman Church. The Christians were at this time under-
going the eighth general persecution, that of Valerian, and
Sixtus was led to martyrdom a.d. 258. Laurence, his deacon,
made a most affecting appeal to be allowed to suffer with his
"father," whom he had so often assisted in offering the Holy
Sacrifice. This did not come to pass; but within a week he
drew on himself the fury of his persecutors by distributing
the property of the Church among the poor Christians, and
when asked to deliver it up, shewing Christ's poor instead as
the true treasure. He was then laid on an iron frame like a
gridiron, and slowly burned to death over live coals. He
suffered with marvellous fortitude, praying for the conversion
of Rome. Prudentius in a beautiful hymn ascribes the con-
version of that city to the martyr's intercession. He is
named in the earliest known Roman Calendar, a.d. 354, and
in the Commnnicantes in the Canon of the Mass. [Sar. Ep.
and Gosp. : 2 Cor. ix. 6-10. St. John xii. 24-26.]
Calendars — AH.
Dedications of Churches — About two hundred and fifty, and
three with other Saints.
Represented — As a deacon, with gridiron, and with thurible,
church and book, long cross-staff, or money-bag.
24] St. Bartholomew, Apcstle and MARTYR.^[5fe notes
on Gosp. Ep. and Coll.]
Dedications of Churches — About one hundred and fifty.
Represented — With a flaying-knife in his hand ; sometimes
a human skin on his arm.
28] St.Auoustine, Blshop of Hippo, Confessorand Doctor.
— This great confessor and doctor of the Western Church was
born at Tagaste, in Nuniidia, November 13, a.d. 354. Hisfather
was one Patricius, a pagan, and his mother the holy Christian
Monica, commemorated as a saint in the Latin Church on
May 4th. Augustine appears to have had a liberal educa-
tion, but to have been early corrupted by theatres and other
immoral influences in Carthage, whither he had been sent to
learn rhetoric, etc. Here, at the age of eighteen, he became
the father of a son named Adeodatus. Cicero's writings
excited the philosophic spirit in his mind, and lie at first
thought he saw in Manichajism a solution of all difficulties.
But it could alTord him no lasting satisfaction. His discovery
of the superficiality of Faustus the Manicha;an prevented him
from committing himself to Manicha?anism. and while in an
unsettled state, he wrote, at the age of twenty-six, on "The
Beautiful and the Fitting." In a.d. 383 he went to Rome
to teach rhetoric, and there lived much among the Manichees,
whose heresy he at length quite abandoned, and joined the
Academicians, only to find in the conflict of philosophies as
much bewilderment as ever, and, on the whole, inclining to
general scepticism. In a.d. 384 he removed to Milan, where
he gradually fell under the influence of St. Ambrose, as also
of his mother, who now came to live with him, with his
friend Alypius, his brother Navigius, and his son Adeodatus.
Her influence told for good on the young men in many ways.
The mother of Adeodatus, with whom Augustine had so long
lived, was cruelly sent back to Africa without her son at
Monica's entreaty. Augustine had not yet found rest and
strength in Christ, nor could he find them in Plato, whose
works he read in a Latin translation. He could not long
deny the existence of evil ; the sins of which his own con-
science was full cried out against such teaching. He con-
sulted Simplician of Milan, listened to the discourses of St.
Ambrose, conversed with Pontitian, an African Christian,
studied St. Paul's Epistles, and went to church with Alypius.
The story of St. Anthony went to the depths of his inmost
soul. He felt that Christ and His Gospel were living powers.
He longed for the pure and blessed life of those holy ones
who followed Christ. But he had to struggle with his love
of pleasure, his passions, his earthly ties. And as he lay
down and wept, he heard a child's voice singing Totle, Lege.
The words went to his heart ; he opened the roll of St. Paul's
Epistles and read, "Not in rioting and drunkenness, not in
chambering and wantonness, not in strife and envying. But
put ye on the Lord Jesus Christ, and make not provision for
the flesh, to fulfil the lusts thereof" [Rom. xiii. 13, 14]. This
was the turning-point. On Easter Eve, April 25, a.d. 387,
he was baptized by St. Ambrose at Milan, together with
Alypius and Adeodatus, and on the following day they were
admitted to their first Communion. The legend that St.
Ambrose and St. Augustine together composed the Tc Deum
on this occasion may have some foundation in fact. How-
ever this may be, Augustine was now happy. As he says
himself, the notes of the hymns and canticles of the Church
flowed in at his ears, and God's truth revealed itself in his
heart, and he wept for joy ; it was well for him to be there.
But soon probably he would be involved in the conflict
between Ambrose and Justiua [April 4th]. Monica died too
about this time, and the loud weeping of Adeodatus was
checked by Augustine, who thought such a display of sorrow
inconsistent with Christian hope. At length, however,
nature prevailed, and Augustine also wept. They found com-
fort in praying for Monica, and "the sacrifice of our ransom
was oflfered for her." vSo far we are mainly indebted to St.
Augustine's own Confessions for the particulars of his life ;
the rest is gathered from a life of him l)y his friend Possidius,
and from scattered allusions in his epistles, etc. Want of
space forbids more than a very hasty glance at the remainder
of his history. He was at Rome A.D. 388, and in 391 was
ordained priest by Valerius, Bishop of Hippo, the city of the
Numidian kings, but now more famous as the See of Augustine,
Cbc a^inor Ibolptiaps of 9ugu9t.
i6i
Here he preached a great deal for Valerius, and corrected an
abuse of tlie ai/apce, a custom of wliich we perhaps have a sur-
vival iu the jiunin benndictiis distributed iu France. In ad.
395 he was cousecrated Bishop, and soon was much occupied
in the famous ecclesiastical controversy with the Donatists,
and had a literary correspondence with St. Jerome. From 412
to 418 he had to combat the heresy of PeK-igius, and was him-
self led into exaggerated statements of doctrine, and into a
persecuting policy. He seems to have forgotten how by an
exercise of his own freewill he had himself cast off the old
man and his deeils, and was disposed to attribute to Divine
(irace a constraining power destructive of human freedom,
and to have laid down ma.xims most dangerous to morality.
He wrote a letter to Sixtus, priest of Rome, -which gave rise
to much controversy, the Galilean Church especially combat-
ing his views. In a.d. 427 he published " Retractations," —
not a recantation, but a survey and revision, — the result of
a calmer consideration of former statements. In June a.d.
430, Hippo was besieged by the Arian Vand.ils, but Augustine
ceased not to preach and to work till in August lie was pro-
strated by fever, and on August 30th he died in his seventy-
seventh year. In his last hours he repeated the Penitential
Psalms with many tears, and had them fixed on the wall
opposite to his bed. His body was buried at Hippo, removed
to Sardinia fifty-six years after by exiled African Bishops,
and A.D. 710 redeemed from the .Saracens by Luitprand, King
of the Lombards Since then it has been at Favia, but in
1837 some portions were sent to a church in Algeria, on the
ruined site of Hippo. [Sar. Ep. and Gosp. : Ecclus. xlvii.
8-11. St. Matt. V. 13-19.]
Calendars — All.
Dedications of Churches — Twenty-nine, except any which
may be to St. Augustine of Canterbury [May 26th].
Represented — With a burning heart, or a heart with one or
two arrows ; with an eagle.
29] Beheading of St. John Baptist. — This minor festival
of St. John Baptist commemorates his death as related in St.
Matt. xiv. 1-12. It probably took place shortly before the
Passover. The 29th of August is the day of the dedication of
a basilica at Alexandria on the site of a temple of Serapis,
in which basilica reputed relics of St. John B.nptist were
kept. Portions are shewn at Amiens, Enme, and elsewhere.
One of the explanations of the name of " Halifax," the church
of which parish is dedicated to St. John the Baptist, is that
the halirf feax, or holy hair, of the Baptist was shewn at a
hermitage there : a tradition embodied in the present arms of
the town, tliough there are, perhaps, other explanations at
least as probable. The nati\ity of St. Jolin the Baptist [June
24th] is observed as his greater festival, because of its
miraculous character and its connection with that of our
Blessed Lord. [Prov. x. 28 32, r.nd xi. .3, 6. 8-11. St.
Markvi. 17-29.]
Calendars — All.
Represented — The headless body prostrate, the daughter of
Herodias holding a charger with the head in it, and the
executioner looking on.
102
Cf)e CafcnOar toitfj tfjc Cable of lessons.
d
o
:s
•-
n
w
1
:l£ >'P'>'
'?
•d
.rt :s ;H .^
X "x "x X "x
^t
o . .
>■
■?'-pT.a X
X X X X X
1
"3
O -r-
J3
O
1 l-^^l
1^3
'>
.d-p"l|
■ri
OS
s
:3
• r- '-H
vf
1
X
x"x'x'x 'x
> *>
X X
"? ■> .2 X
X X X X
X
:a:3.> >••>
X X X X X
X X X X X
X X rt ..w
X xg.3:s
a
o
•a
-a
:a
:^
-■ :s'-^-.
3
S
?
1
— o
.d
n
a
o
t-5
^^3
CD :a l5 2j
>
'C x'x'x
3 s "o &
o rs'd wc-
•
»' m iS :=" T|i fS
•5 .
o ^
o
5i
o
S
x'
'x
.?! ^^
^ = s -2 »
.S X X 'x 'x
-^. X
:d > > >
o
>"
■* -^ ^ t^ ^
.• .J CI lO _
: 0, -• -■ -s
CO CD
:3 ia.S .^
p-(
>
X X
X X X X
X
x^...^:a
S(N
si
. .s?
CO a"t-: "^ S-* 1
e
S"
=j
-"!..
o
o ~. :5 ^
1
>
'x
5 _ 2"=^
CD
05
o :3
-^ X
C3 -■ §
fl 1
:3 • CO
p
O
CO
4
P4
'5'> x"'x X
X X X X X
X
X
X
X
X X X X g
X X X X .^
p
>••>■•§.£
'x
J's.dx
X o:= _5
fO "^ .^
— i
s.' ■+■ :s
;;co
A
-p
"i
a
t^
.„* CC rH
.«
CO
X
3
a _;
3
o:
O
^
rM
u
Jis
i
^
»■
ci J2
pq
en
>•
<
o
'•< X X X i<
X
>
X
g..d.^.
V'f
■>.!:S x"H
•3
V.'^-.slS.i
•^ ^••^- 1
o
Is
IS
d
o
rH
i-H
■ ^ ? x' X >?
X y. X X X
i
X
X
o
xxxii. to V. 17.
xxxiii. )'. 21.
xxxiv. V. 17.
xxxvii. to V. 15.
xlvii. to V. 13.
'a.j
B
X
. >
'.2
1 "■■' "•
§5
" O
o 12 «=
43
K
n
i-s
.*:>
:-«
U U 43
o
I^
t
,1
Em
l>
3
r
ftT3 g,c«
1
ft
■a
a
ft
n.
it ^i
-^ bO !— o
o
O
o
n
M
6t
1 li
•rH
a
o
O
H
o
"is a "" S 2
<« n C -^ -a
a> § S -ti -tf
M
a
a
a
E a
rt/3
J= O
2^
= t. 3
"S'S) ■
^ 02
W
00
a of
■ ci a
Pi
<1
rt OT
t- rt
rt o
CPh
4J 43
a ci
acq
0"4i
t-i a)
00
a
rt
E3
a
b'n
^
^
^
a
--I
43
W
c
M
©
a
>-,
CL.
rt
M
H
M
a3
43
a
.a 3 -ts
> a a
•5 2
•-^ art
» -SW
■« a
■ o rt
a 2 "
d O.S 3
43 .2 *-■ o °
^ *; 4i cc
M 2
c
a g
■g M
= I
o
>» a J-
^8 2
. « ":B
g-3 a -
a a
a
m a
a o
.2 'a
a 'i
rt Cli
o- a
a S 3
O j«
^ m O
;i3
g" 3 - 2
43 GC C
•<-, o t-i
m rt a
rt C«
£ a 2
o p a
— OJ
Ohts a
3 c rt
O rt „
W-, m a ^•
c =-:2 &
2CC
IS
a
m
rt
•
.2
1
a
1
1
go"
'Eb
>
>>
.2
c3
1
S
m
^
S
1
i
to
§
rS
^2;
s
H
C
"rt "a
CS
■s
'rt
■«
'rt'rt la
rt c3 c« e3
'eS
■i
^^ilzilz;
^
ni
S2
t— I
000
^
!jci;^cjo
OOQO
Q
rf
u
&4
^
(5
-Si^aJ
10 ■* C<5
C-)
^
Cl X t-
com ■* «
u
10 TJH CC
J-H
COt^CD 10 -<* CO
'^
'"'
<
^
T5
a>
■»*H
to<^
•s
QJ *«-«
ao
ler nos Rex avgelorum
Deus. Adoramus Te, Oloriosuni rei;em Israel in llirono Palris
Tiii. Glorificamus Te, veneranda Trinitas. Gratias agimus
Tibi propter niagnam gloriam Tuam, Domine Deus Rex
ccelestis, Deus Pater Omnipotens. Domine Fili unigenite
Jesu Christe, Domine Deus, Agnus Dei, Eilius Patris, qui
tollis peccata mundi, miserere nobis. Qui tollis peccata muudi
suscipe deprecationem nostram. Qui scdcs ad dexteram Patris
miserere nobis, In sale 7najestatis Tiiw. Quoniani Tu solus
sanctus, Deu.i fortia el immortalis : Tu solus Dominus, Casks-
Hum, terrestrium, et infernornm Hex : Tu solus altissimus,
Hex reijum rcijnuin Tuuni solidum permanebit in aternvm,
Jesu Christe. Cum sanoto Spiritu iu gloria Dei Patris.
Amen."
This is given by Pamelius [Liturgicon, ii. 611], and he also
prints another which was used at the Dedication of a Church.
Although there is much beauty in such an arrangement, the
reverent remark of Cardinal Bona is very applicable. He
says, after quoting these two forms: "Non desunt alia
exempla, sed ista supcrflua sunt, ut quistjue agnoscat
teiiicrario quorumdam ausu, seu potius simplicitate, ac zelo
qui non crat secundum scientiam, inserta ha^c Angclico
hymno fuisse, qua; Ecclesiasticam gravitatem miiiime redo-
lent, cultumque diviuum non augent, sed diminuunt. " ■
[Bona, Her. Lilurg. II. iv. 6.]
1 The fuUowiug iutcrpulated version is taken from the Minor of our
396
Cf)e Communion.
H Then the Priest (or Bishop if he be present) shall
let them depart with this blessing.
THE peace of God, T\'hicli passetli all under-
standing, keep yowv hearts and minds in
the knowledge and love of God, and of His Son
Jesus Christ our Loed : And the blessing of
God Almighty, the Fathee, the Son, and the
Holy Ghost, be amongst you, and remain with
you always. Amen.
!> S. g. % after
Consecration and
before Communion.
c Leofric's Kxeter
Pontifical.
d aL rfiaiteai.
[ " Deinde si episcopus celebraverit, diaconus ad populum
conversus baculum episcopi in dextera tenens,
curvatura baculi ad se conversa dicat hoc modo.
HumUlale vos ad bcnedklioncm.
*TI)AX Domini ^ sit sem^per vobiscum.]
'Benedictio Dei Pateis et Filii et Spieitus
Sancti, et pas Domini, "'sit semper vobiscum.
T Collects to be said after the Offertory, when there
is no Communion, every such day one, or more ;
and the same may be said also, as often as occasion
shall serve, after the Collects either of Morning or
Evening Prayer, Communion, or Litany, by the
discretion of the Minister.
ASSIST us mercifully, Loed, in these our
-^^^ supplications and prayers, and dispose the
way of Thy servants towards the attainment of
everlasting salvation ; tliat, among all the changes
and chances of this mortal life, they may ever
be defended by Thy most gracious and ready
help; through Jesus Christ our Lokd. Amen.
O ALMIGHTY Loed, and everlasting God,
vouchsafe, we beseech Thee, to direct,
sanctify, and govern, both our hearts and bodies
in the ways of Thy laws, and in the works of Thy
Commandments ; that througli Thy most mighty
protection, both here and ever, we may be pre-
served in body and soul, through our Loed and
Saviouk Jesus Cheist. Ainen.
a RANT, we beseech Thee, Almighty God,
that the words which we have heard this
^ Sar. Missa pro
iter age)ttibiis.
Greg, ii'ia. Gelas.
fid Pnm. Gelas.
Mur. i. 703. L.atin
Primer. 1516. " I-"or
wayfaryng men."
^ Siir. an Prim.
Greg, ibid, Men-
ard, 125.
£r A.D. r549.
h Liturgy of St.
James.
'ADESTO, Domine, supplicationibus nostris :
-L\- et viam famulorum Tuorum in salutis Tu»
prosperitate dispone : ut inter omnes vise et vitse
hujus varietates, Tuo semper protegantur auxilio.
Per DoMiNUM.
-^T^IEIGERE et sanctificare et regere dignare,
-L/ DoMiNE Deus, quassumus, corda et cor-
pora nostra in lege Tua, et in operibus manda-
torum Tuorum : ut hie et in sternum, Te auxi-
liante, sani et salvi esse mereamur. Per.
^(~\ GOD, "Who hast sounded into our ears Thy
v_/ divine and salutary oracles, enlighten the
THE BLESSING.
This beautiful Benediction is peculiar to the English
Liturgy, both as to form and place. It is plainly intended to
be a substitute for the Benediction anciently given after the
Lord's Prayer and the Fi'action of the Bread, and before tlie
Agnus Dei. The latter half of it is analogous to a Benedic-
tion used in Anglo-Saxon times and given in the Appendix
to HicKEs' Letters, as well as in the Exeter Pontifical [see
also Confirmation Office] : the former half is a reversion from
the old Liturgical form to one containing more of the actual
words of Holy Scripture: "And the peace of God, which
passeth all understanding, shall keep your hearts and minds
through Clirist Jesus. " [Phil. iv. 7.] This former part alone
was used in " The Order of Communion " of 1548.
A comparison of the modern and ancient Rubrics (for the
latter of which see the Burntisland edition of the Sarum
Missal, 622 f. ) will shew that this Blessing is to be considered
a special sacerdotal act, belonging of right to the episcopal
office, and devolving from it to the Priest, in the absence of
the Bishop. As Absolution conveys actual pardon of sins to
the true penitent, so does Benediction convey a real benefit
T/tdy, and sltews to what length sucli free handling of ancient furms has
been carried by indiscreet persons : " Glory be to god, on hy. And peace
in erthe to men of good wylle. we prayse the. we blysse the. we worship
the. we glorify the. we thanke the. for thy grete glory Lorde god heuenly
kynge. god father almyghty. Lorde oncly sone o/mary Jesu cryste. Lorde
god. lambe of god. sone of the father that doest away the synnes of the
worlde haue mercy on vs. hy the moste pyteful prayer of thy mother mary
vyrgyn. Thou that doest away the synnes of the worlde. receyue oure
prayer, that we mote cotyneivally please the and thy holy mother mary vyrgyn.
Thou that syttest on the righte syde of the father, haue mercy on vs. hy ye
suffrages of mary. that is mother and doughter of her sone. For thou only
art holy, mary only is mother and vyrgyn. Thou only arte lorde. Nary
oncly ysa lady. Thou only arte hyest. father and sone of mary. Jesu criste
to the" holy goste in glory of god the father. Amen." Suchfurms are said
by Daniel [Thesaur. Hymnol. ii. 273] to be in almost all German Missals of
the middle ages ; and there was one of a similar kind ordered by the later
Sarum Missals to be sung daily at the Mass in Lady Chapels.
to the soul when received in faith at the mouth of God's
minister.
This Benediction is commonly used on other occasions in
the full form in which it is here given ; but it seems better
to use it thus only in connection with the Holy Conimimion,
and at other times to begin with "The Blessing of God Al-
mighty," as at the end of the Confirmation Service, and as
was the ancient custom. Bishop Cosin inserted it thus at
the end of the Burial Office, but the Commissioners substi-
tuted 2 Cor. xiii. 1-1.
THE OCCASIONAL COLLECTS.
The Rubric which precedes these Collects originallj'
extended only as far as "Every such day one:" all that
follows was added in 1552. Bishop Cosin amended it thus :
" Collects to be said one or more at the discretion of the
Minister, before the final Collect of Morning and Evening
Prayer, Litany, or Commnnion, as occasion shall serve: as also
after the Offertory, or Prayer for the estate of Chri.iVs Church,
when there is no Communion celebrated." But although this
emendation was not erased, the Rubric was printed in the old
form. By "before the fnal Collect," Cosin meant before
what is headed the "third" Collect in Morning and Evening
Prayer. He erased the words " second " and " third " before
"Collect "in both headings, and introduced between them,
at Evening Prayer, the ancient Prime Collect, " O Almighty
Lord and everlasting God," under the title of "The Collect
for grace and protection." From tliig correction, and from
its being set aside, it is evident that these Occasional Collects,
which Cosin wished to use before the third Collect, are in-
tended to be used after it, and not after the Prayer of St.
Chrysostom, which is nowhere called a "Collect" in the
Book of Common Prayer. It seems as if the conclusion of
the Service with the third Collect [see p. 201] was considered
by some to be too abrupt ; and that, therefore, discretion
was given to use one of these Collects in addition.
Cljc Communion.
397
day with our outward ears, may through Thy
grace be so grafted inwardly in our hearts, that
they may bring forth in us the fruit of good liv-
ing, to the honour and praise of Thy Name ;
through Jesus Christ our Lokd. Amen.
PEEVENT us, O Loed, in all our doings with
Thy most gracious favour, and further us
with Thy continual help ; that in all our works
begun, continued, and ended in Thee, we may
glorify Thy holy Name, and finally by Thy mercy
obtain everlasting life, through Jesus Christ
our Lord. Amen.
'ALMIGHTY God, the Fountain of all wisdom,
-lA. Who knowest our necessities before we ask,
and our ignorance in asking ; We beseech Thee
to have compassion upon our Infirmities ; and
those things, which for our unworthiness we dare
not, and for our blindness we cannot ask, vouch-
safe to give us for the worthiness of Thy Son
Jesus Christ our Lord. Amen.
'ALMIGHTY GoD,Whohastpromisedto hearthe
-L^ petitions of them that ask in Thy Son's
Name ; We beseech Thee mercifully to incline
Thine ears to us that have made now our prayers
and supplications unto Thee; and grant, that those
things which we have faithfully asked according to
Thy will, may effectually be obtained, to the relief
of our necessity, and to the setting forth of Thy
glory ; through Jesus Christ our Lord. Amen.
« Aar. after Mass.
Greg. Sabi. in xii.
tat. mensu f>rimi.
Mur. ii. 34.
t A,D. 1549.
souls of US sinners to the receiving of that which
hath been read, that we do not appear as hearers
alone of spiritual things, but may also be doers
of good works, following after faith unfeigned,
and blameless life, and innocent conversation.
" ACTIONES nostras, quaesumus, Domine, et
-^^^ aspirando praeveni et adjuvando prose-
quere : ut cuncta nostra operatio et a Te semper
incipiat, et per Te coepta finiatur. Per.
IT Upon the Sundays and otlier Holydays (if there be
no Communion) shall be said all that is appointed
at the Communion, until the end of the general
Prayer [ ''For the whole state of Christ's Chm-ch
ft at. For the good
estate of the Ca-
tholick Church of
Christ.
militant here in earth'] together with one or more
of these Collects last before rehearsed, concluding
with the Blessing.
IT And there shall be no Celebration of the Lord's
The first, second, and fourth of these Occasional Collects
are translated from ancient forms, used for many ages in the
Church of England. The third is a paraphrase of the prayer
'0 ivijxviTas Tjf^ds 9e6s rd Oeid (7ov X67ta in the Liturgy of .St.
James. [Neale's ed. p. 48.] The fifth and sixth appear to
be compositions of the Reformers, the latter reading like a
paraphrase of the prayer of St. Chrysostom.
THE FINAL RUBRICS.
These " Cauteh-e Missa) " were inserted in 1552, supersed-
ing some longer Rubrics which had been placed here in the
Prayer l?ook of 1549 : but some important alterations were
made by Cosin, some of which were adopted by the Commis-
sioners in 16R1.
Upon the Stnula;/s and other Hob/days] The Liturgy of
1549 here ordered that when there were "none to communi-
cate with the Priest" ho should still "say all things at the
iltar, appointed to be said at the celebration of the Lord's
Supper, until after the Offertory," concluiling with "one or
two of the Collects atorewritten," and the ".accustomed bless-
ing." The present panagraph was substituted in 1552, but
without the words " Sundays and other " before " holydays,"
and without the direction to conclude with the IJlessing.
Tiiese were added in IG61. The Scottish Liturgy of 1637
does not order the IJlcssing to be given.
It is obscrv.able that our Communion Office contains ab-
solutely no hint as to whether or wlien, on occasion of a
celebration, persons present in the Church and not intending
then to communicate are to withdr.aw. Still less is tliere any
warrant for the practice of dismissing the non-comnumicants
with one or two of the preceding Collects and "The grace of
our Lord. " The Church clearly intends, however, that the
.\l1n3 should .alw.ays be collected from the whole of the con-
gregation, and that all should stay to tlie end of tlie Prayer
for the Church Militant. Then, " if there be no Communion,"
the Priest is to dismiss the whole congregation with one or
more of the Collects and the Blessing. The Service would
.then be what Durandus [Div. Off. iv. 1. 23] calls a "Missa
Sicca," i.e. when "the Priest, being unable to celebrate,
because he has already done so, or for some other reason,
puts on his stole, reads the Epistle and Gospel, and s.ays the
Lord's Prayer, and gives the Benediction." The same sort
of service is said by Socrates to have been in use in the Church
of Alexandria. [Sockat. Hist. Eccl. v. 22. ]
If, on the other hand, there is a celebration, non-pommuni-
cants are permitted, not commanded, to witlidraw ; wliilst
communicants, drawing nearer towards the Chancel and the
Altar (tarrying ".still in the quire, or in some convenient
place nigh the quire, the men on the one side, and the
women on the other side," 1549), so as to be " conveniently
placed for the receiving of the Holy Sacrament," are more
specially addressed in the Exhortation, " Dearly beloved in
the Lord, ye that mind to come," etc. With regard to the
question of non-communicating attendance, it is best left
open, as the wisdom of the Church has left it. The presence
of persons, wlio, being regular communicants at certain inter-
vals, may not feel prepared to receive at every celebration,
but yet may scruple to leave the Church, and may wish
devoutly to use the opportunity for pr.ayer and intercession,
cannot fairly be called non-communicant attendance, and
could not be forbidden witliout needless cruelty. The pro-
bably rare occurrence of the presence of persons who have
never communicated, and arc not ])rc]iaring to do so, ought
to bo discouraged. But it would in most cases be wise to
encourage young persons preparing for their first Connnunion
to remain througliout the wliole Service. The fact of never
Iiaving witnessed the actual Celebration and Communion,
joined to the natural shyness of the English character, lias
probably in numerous cases delayed the first Communion for
years.
tlie whole state 0/ Christ's Church militant here in earth] This
phrase was altered in the MS. to "the good estate of the
Catholick Church of Christ," and by Cosin into "the good
398
Cbe Communion.
Supper, except there be a convenient number to
communicate with the Priest, according to his dis-
cretion.
IT And if there be not above twenty persons in the
parish of discretion to receive the Communion ;
yet there shall be no Communion, except four (or
three at the least) communicate with the Priest.
IT And in Cathedral and Collegiate Churches, and
CoUeges, where there are many Priests and
Deacons, they shall all receive the Communion
with the Priest "every Sunday at the least, except
they have a reasonable cause to the contrary.
IT And to take away all occasion of dissension and
a The original words
of the Sis. were,
"once in every
week," but tliey
were erased and
" every Sunday "
substituted.
superstition, which any person hath or might
have concerning the Bread and Wine, it shall
sulEce that the bread be such as is usual to be
eaten ; but the best and purest wheat bread that
conveniently may be gotten.
IT And if any of the Bread and Wine remain uncon-
secrated, the Curate shall have it to his own use :
but if any remain of tliat wliich was consecrated,
it shall not be carried out of the Church, but the
Priest and such otlier of the Communicants as he
shall then call unto him, shall, immediately after
the Blessing, reverently eat and diink the same.
II The Bread and Wine for the Communion shall be
estate of Christ's Catholick Church : " but it was restored to
its previous form. It was printed in the altered form in the
Sealed Books, but altered with the pen in several of them.
It stands as in the original MS., however, in many later
Prayer Books, e.ij. one of 1668.
a conrcnknt number'] This is defined, by the next Rubric,
to be "four (or three at the least)" besides the Priest himself.
The rule is in agreement with the directions given by several
ancient Councils. Tlie forty-third Canon of the Council of
Mentz [.\.D. 813] forbade priests to say Mass when there was
no one else present. Tliat of Paris [a.d. 829] says in its
forty-eighth Canon, that " a blamewortliy custom has in very
many places crept in, partly from negligence, partly from
avarice, \-iz. that some of the priests celebrate the solemn
rites of masses without ministers." A Council at York [a.d.
1195] decrees that no priest shall celebrate, "sine ministro
literato ; " and many others of a similar kind miglit be quoted.
Yet there is no essential reason why this rule should be
enforced. Should a celebration aud communion take place
in the chamber of a sick person, "in time of plague . . . when
none of the parish or neighbours can be gotten to communi-
cate with the sick in their houses for fear of the infection,"
and only the priest and the one sick person are there, it is
quite as valid as if "four, or three at the least," were present.
The reason, moreover, assigned by Councils and by Liturgical
writers against Solitary Masses is that tliere is an indecorum
and absurdity in saying "The Lord be with you," and
similar versicles, when there is no one present : a difficulty
which has been supposed to be met by the suggestion that
the priest addresses himself to the absent Cliurch "as present
by faith and communicating in the Sacraments by charity."
On tlie whole it must be considered tliat the rule is one of
expediency, and not of principle. It arose out of two con-
flicting causes : [1] The anxiety of the Clergy to ofler up th^
Holy Eucharist day by day for the benefit of the Church, and
[2] the indifl'ei"ence of tlie Laity to frequent Communion.
Bishop Cosin wrote, "Better were it to endure the absence
of people, than for the minister to neglect the usual and daily
sacrifice of the Church, by which all people, whether they be
there or no, reap so much benefit. And this was the opinion
of my lord and master. Dr. Overall." [Works, v. 127.] Yet
the "four, or tliree at the least," was written in a slightly
varied form of the Rubric which Cosin inserted in the Durham
volume. Perliaps it is one of those rules to whicli exceptions
may sometimes be made under the wise law, "Charity is
above Rubrics."
in Cathedral and Collegiate C/iurc?te$, and Colleges^ The word
" Colleges " was inserted by Cosin, who also ei-ased the words
"except they shall have a reasonable cau^e to the contrary,"
and inserted after "Sunday" " or once in the month." It is
to be hoped that the next generation will be entirely without
experience of " Catlicdrals, Collegiate Churches, or CoUeges "
where this rule of a weekly celebration is transgressed.
it shall suffice that the bread] This Rubric stood thus in the
Prayer Book of 1549: " For avoiding of all matters and occa-
sion of dissension, it is meet that the bread prejiared for the
Communion be made, through all this realm, after one sort and
fashion : that is to say, unleavened, and rotind, as it was afore,
but witliout all manner of print, and something more larger and
thicker than it luas, so that it may be aptly divided Ch divers
pieces : and every one shall be divided in ttvo pieces, at the least,
or more, by the discretion of the minister, and so distributed.
And men must not think less to be received in part than i» the
lohole, but in each of them the u-holc body of our Saviour Jesu
Christ." It was altered to its present form in 1552.
Bishop Cosin proposed to substitute the following : " Con-
cerning the Bread and Wine, the Bread shall be such as is
usual : yet the best and purest that conveniently may be gotten :
though wafer Bread {pure and without any figure set upon it)
shall not be forbidden, especially in such churches where it hath
been accustomal. The Wine also shall be of the best and purest
that may be had."
This was scarcely in accordance with the interpretation put
upon the existing Rubric by the Elizabethan Injunctions
[a.d. 1559], and by Archbishop Parker. The former directs
as follows : " Item, Where also it was in the time of K.
Edward the Sixt used to have the Sacramental bread of com-
mon fine bread, it is ordered for the more reverence to be
given to these holy mysteries, being the Sacraments of the
body and blood of our Saviour Jesus Christ, that the same
Sacramental bread be made and formed plain, without any
figure thereupon, of the same finenesse and fashion round,
though somewhat bigger in compasse and thicknesse, as the
usuall bread and wafer,' heretofore named singing cakes,
which served for the use of the private Masse. " Archbishop
Parker, when appealed to as to the meaning of the Rubric,
wrote, "It sliaU suffice, I expound, where either there
wanteth such fine usual bread, or superstition be feared in
the wafer-bread, they may have the Communion in fine usual
bread ; which is rather a toleration in these two necessities,
than is in plain ordering, as it is in the Injunction." [Cor-
respondence, p. 376.] He also wrote to Sir William Cecil,
"As you desired, I send you here the form of the bread used,
and was so appointed by order of my late Lord of London
[Grindal] and myself, as we took it not disagreeable to the
Injunction. And how so many churches have of late varied
I cannot tell ; except it be the practice of the common adver-
sary the devil, to make variance and dissension in the Sacra-
ment of Unity." [/bid. .STS.] Parker was also consulted by
Parkliurst, Bishop of Norwich, on tlie subject. He first
referred him to the Ruliric and Injunction, and in a subse-
quent letter wrote, "I trust that you mean not universally
in your diocese to comniaud or wink at the loaf-bread, but,
for peace and quietness, here and there to be contented there-
with." [Ibid. 460.] In his Visitation Articles, Parker also
inquired, "And whether they do use to minister the Holy
Communion in wafer-bread, according to the Queen's Ma-
jesty's Injunctions ? "
This contemporary interpretation of the Rubric shews
plainly that the Sacramental Bread was usually to be in the
form of wafers, but that for peace and quietness' sake, where
wafers were objected to, " the best and purest ■« heat bread
that may conveniently be gotten " might be permitted.
Thus on July 26, 1580, a letter was sent from the Privy
Council to Chaderton, Bishop of Chester, containing the fol-
lowing : "And where[as] youre Lordship desiereth to be
resolved, from us touchinge two speciall Points worthy of
Reformation ; thone, for the Lords Supper, with Wafers, or
with common Bread . . . for the Appeasiuge of such Divi-
sion and Bitternes as doth and maie aiyse of the Use of both
tliese Kinds of Bread, we thinke yt meete. Tiiat in such
Parishes as doe use the common Bread and in otliers that
embrase the Wafer, they be severallie continued as they are
at this present. Until which Time also your Lordship is to
be careful, according to your good Discretion to persuade and
procure a Quietness amongst such as sliall strive for the pub-
lic maintaining either of the one or the other : whereof we
hope your Lordship will take care as appertaineth. " [Peck's
Desiderata Curiosa, i. 16.]
Such an interpretation was also given to the Rubric by the
practice of learned bishops like Andrewes, by the custom of
Westminster Abbey, aud of the Royal Chapels, and by the
practice of learned parochial Clergy, such as Burton, author
of the Anatomy of Melancholy, who was Vicar of St. Thomas',
Oxford.
1 Cardwell prints *' water," after Sparrow : but this seems to have been
a printer's error.
Cf)e Communion.
399
provided by the Curate and the Church-wardens
at the charges of the parish.
T And note, that every parishioner shall communicate
at the least three times in the year, o£ which
Easter to be one. And yearly at Easter every
parishioner shall reckon with the Parson, Vicar,
or Curate, or his or their Deputy or Deputies ;
and pay to tliem or him all Ecclesiastical Duties
accustomably due, then and at that time to be
paid.
IT After the Divine Service ended, the money given at
the Offertory shall be disposed of to such pious
and charitable uses, as the Minister and Church-
wardens shall think fit. Wherein if they disagree,
it shall be disposed of as the Ordinary shall appoint.
H TTTHEREAS it is ordained in this Office for the
VV Administration of the Lord's Supper, that
the Communicants should receive the same kneeling ;
(which Order is well meant, for a signification of our
liunible and grateful acknowledgement of the benefits
of Christ therein given to all worthy Receivers, and
for tlie avoiding of such profanation and disorder in the
holy Communion, as might otherwise ensue) yet lest
the same kneeling should by any persons, either out
of ignorance and infirmity, or out of malice and
In the Oriental Church fermented or leavened bread is
used : but the general practice of the Western Church has
been to use bread jirepared without fermentation, as being
purer. The Old Lutherans also use wafer-bread, and it was
used even by Calvin.
And if any of the Bread and Wine remain unconsecrated]
This is a recognition of the right which the Christian Ministry
has to "live by the Altar." [See 1 Cor. ix. 4-14; Gal. vi. 6.]
but if any reynaiii of that which teas C07isec7-ated] These
words were inserted by Bishop Cosin. They bear important
testimony as to the opinion held by the Revisers of IGGl in
respect to the effect of consecration. Some remarks on the
Reservation of the Holy Eucharist will be found in the
Notes to "the Order for the Communion of the Sick."
shall be provided . . . at the charges of the parish] In the
Primitive Church the Elements were offered by tlie people,
probably in successive order, the bread being taken from that
which was oifered for tlie love-feasts. In some churches of
France this very ancient custom is still kept up, under the
name of " I'offrandre." Large circular cakes of bread, sur-
rounded by lighted tapers, are, during the OS'ertory, carried
on a sort of bier by two deacons or sub-deacons from the
west end of the Church up to the Altar, and after being
blessed (hence called jmin bini) and cut up into small pieces
are carried round in a basket and distributed among the con-
gregation. A simil.ar relic of the Primitive Church is main-
tained at Milan, where ten bedesmen and two aged women
form a community for the purpose ; two of whom, vested in
black and wliite mantles, carry tlie Oblations up to the choir,
wliere they are received by the Deacon.
In all the ancient Bidding Prayers of the Church of Eng-
land there is a clause, "ye shall pray for him or her that this
day gave the holy bread," or "the bread to be made holy
bread of," " and for him that first began and longest holdeth
on, that God reward it him at the day of doom," from which
it -nay be seen (as from much otlier evidence) that this cus-
tom of the blessed bread maintained its hold in England as
late, at least, as the sixteenth century. It was discontinued
because the bread so blessed was superstitiously regarded by
many ignorant persons as equivalent to the Holy Sacrament
itself.
The present Rubric may be considered as an adaptation of
this custom, but it is quite certain that the wafers for con-
secration must always have been provided under the special
direction of the Clergy, though certainly at the cost of the
parish.
The 20th Canon provides that the wine shall be brought to
the Altar in a metal flagon or cruet, of pewter or silver, thus
forbidding any domestic vessel such as a glass bottle.
three times .ill the yiar'] This is a very ancient rule of the
Church. Councils Iiehl at Agde [a.d. 506] and Autun [a.d.
(>"0] decreed that "laymen who did not communicate at
Christmas, Easter, and Pentecost, were not to be considered
as CathoUcs [Labb. iv. 1.S86, xiv. 1887], and these decrees
were often adopted by other Councils. The words of the
modern Rubric reproduce also those of earlier English rules.
The Council of Euuliam or Enshaiii under St. Alphrge [a.d.
1009] ordering, " Let every one wlio understands Iiis own need
prepare himself to go to Housel at least thrice in the year,
so as it is requisite for him " [.louN.so.v's Ere. Laws, i. 487] :
and a Synod of I'.isliops under Archbishop Sudbury [a.d.
1378] ordering, "Let Confessions be heard three times in tlio
year, and let men bo admonislied to communicate as often,
namely, at Easter, Pentecost, and Christmas." [Jounson's
Ecc. Latvs, ii. 444.]
Easter to be one] In the Prayer Books from 1552 to 1CG2
these words were followed by "and shall also receive the
Sacraments and other Rites, according to the order in tliis
Book appointed." It lias often been said that these words
were omitted from modern Prayer Books without authority ;
but they do not .appear in the MS., and they are crossed
through in the black-letter book of 1636 ; the assertion is
therefore a mistaken one.
the money . . . shall be disposed of] This Rubric was added
in 1661. It is a modification of the following, which was the
one proposed by Bishop Cosin ; —
"If After the Divine Service ended, the money lehich was
offered shall be divided, one half to the Priest " [erasure, " to
providehim books of Divinity "], "the other half to he employed
to some pious or charitable use far the decent furnisliing of the
Church, or the relief of the poor, among whom it shall be dis-
tributed if need require, or put into the poor man's box at the
discretion of the Priest and dnirch-wardens, or other officers
of the place that are for thcd purjwse appointed."
This was substantially taken from the Scottish book of
1637 : and offers some guide as to the purposes to which it
was intended that the Offertory money should be applied.
THE DECLARATION ON KNEELING.
This Note was first added to the Communion Office .at the
last Revision in 1661 ; having been written into tire MS. after
tlie latter had been completed, and in tlie same handwriting
as that in which it is also written in tlie black-letter Prayer
Book of 1636. It was framed, though with a most important
difference in the wording, from the Declaration which, as a
sort of afterthouglit, was inserted in the majority but not in
all of the copies of the Prayer Book issued in 1552. [See p. 22. ]
This affii'med that "no adoration was done or ought to be
done, either unto the sacramental Bread or Wine there bodily
received, or unto any real and essential presence there being
of Christ's natural Flesli and iJlood." It was probably framed
by Cranmer, and intended merely [see the Rev. T. W. Perry's
exhaustive volume entitled I'he Declaration on Kneeling] as a
protest against the doctrine of Transubstantiation, and the
low notion of a carii.al presence which had come to be the
interpret.ation too commonly put on the phrase "real and
essential presence." The Declaration of 1.552 was "signed
by tlie King " [Strype's Cranmer, bk. ii. ch, 33], but it was
never r.atified by the Church, and is wanting in all editions
of the Prayer Book from Elizabetli's Accession to the Restora-
tion. At the Savoy Conference the Presbyterians desired its
restoration. The IJishops replied, "This Rubric is not in
the Liturgy of Queen Elizabeth, nor confirmed by law ; nor
is there any great need of restoring it, the world being now
in more danger of profanation than of idolatry. Besides, the
sense of it is declared sufficiently in the 28th Article of the
Church of Engliind." [Cakdw. Conferences, p. 354.] ^\'hilst
partly adopting it, the lievisers of 1661 (under theinfiueuce,
as it seems, of Bishop Gauden, probably .at the suggestion of the
venerable Gunning) maile the important change of substitut-
ing the word " corporal " for the words " real and essenti.al."
Tlius they retained the protest against Transubstantiation,
wliilst they removed .all risk of the Declaration, or "Black
Rubric," as it was sometimes called, being misunderstood
as even an apparent denial of the truth of the Real
Presence.
" Natural " is not here used in the sense of \j/vxiK6v, i.e. tlie
Adamic body of 1 Cor. xv. 44, for the Lord's body ceased to
be "natural" in that sense, and became iri/cvixaTiKov after the
Resurrection change. It is used in the sense of "material " (as
our Lord demonstrated to .St. Thomas it still continucil to be
even after the Resurrection ch.ange), .and "having extension
in space," and so occupying a definite position in space, i.e.
localized, qualities not at .all contradictory to those implied by
TvcvixaTmiv, which docs not mean ' ' merely spirituiil, " any moro
th.an tpvx'Kdv means "merely consisting of ^I'x^," but r.ather
means "fully indwelt by, and solely animated liy irfivfia,"
400
Cf)e Communicii.
obstinacy, be misconstrued and depraved ; It is liere
declared : that thereby no adoration is intended, or
ouglit to be done, either unto the Sacramental Bread
or Wine there bodily received, or unto any Corporal
Presence of Christ's natural Flesh and Blood. For the
Sacramental Bread and Wine remain still in their very
Natural Substances, and therefore may not be adored,
(for that were Idolatry, to be abhorred of all faithful
Christians) and the natural Body and Blood of our
Saviour Christ are in Heaven, and not here ; it being
against the truth of Christ's natural Body to be at one
time in more places than one.
and, as such, although material, possessing powers and capa-
bilities which do not belong to the merely natural l)ody.
Further, in thinking of the powers and capabilities of the
Lord's Body, it must be always remembered that, whether
before or after the Resurrection, it was, and is, the Body of
the Everlasting Word, and so absolutely unique in God's
Universe, in such wise that the powers and capabilities of the
bodies, whether "natural" or "spiritual," of other beings
can be no measure for It, nor their limitations predicable of
It.
AN INTEODUCTION
OFFICES FOR HOLY BAPTISM.
The ecclesiastical word Bawnafia, from which our familiar
English word is derived, always associates itself with the
idea of purification, although such an association of ideas was
not necessarily connected with the classical /SaTrrifu, /SaTrTu,
from which it is formed. On the other haud, although the
original classical word has tlie primary sense of dipping (that
is, of more or less immersion in some fluid), tliis sense is not
necessarily comiected with the ecclesiastical word. It is
used in the New Testament with several applications : as, for
example, to the baptism of the Jews by St. John the Baptist
[John i. 26] ; to ceremonial washings of the person and of
vessels used for eating aud drinking [Mark vii. 4 ; Heb. ix.
10]; to the ministry of our Lord [Slatt. iii. 11]; to the
Passiou of our Lord [Luke xii. 50 ; Mark x. 38] ; to the
operation of the Holy Ghost upon the Apostles [Acts i. 5] ;
and, lastly, in its most customary sense, to the rite of Holy
Baptism, instituted by Christ. [Matt, xxviii. 19 ; Acts viii.
36 ; Eph. iv. 5 ; 1 Pet. iii. 21.] Li all these applications of
the word the idea of purification is plainly latent, even when
it is so metaphorically used as in the case of our Lord's words,
"I have a baptism to be baptized with ;" for although He
had no sin from which He could be purified, yet was He
"made siu for us," and also "made perfect through suffer-
ings. " [Heb. ii. 10.] It is moi'eover observable, that after the
institution of the rite of Christian Baptism by our Lord, the
word is not any longer used iu other senses in Holy Scripture
(except historically), l)ut is restricted to the one which it has
commonly held in all subsequent ages.
§ History of HoliJ Baptism.
It appears from the Holy Gospels that the ovdiuauce of
Christian Baptism was a sacramental climax which had been
arrived at, and developed out of, other aud inferior ordinances.
St. John the Baptist prepared the way for our Lord's ministra-
tions among the Jews by leading them to confess their sins ;
and this confession of their sins was followed up by a Baptism
of which no further particulars are given to us than that
those who received it went down into the water [Matt. iii.
1(>] ; and we are not told whether auy words were used at the
time of the immersion.' Of this rite our Lord Himself was
pleased to partake, and by doing so consecrated the element
of water to its future and higher use. A Baptismal rite was
also used in the ministrations of our I.ord, but not by Him-
self [.John iii. 2(i ; iv. 2] ; and from the manner iu which
this was spoken of by the disciples of St. .John the Baptist, it
would appear tliat there ^^■as no outward distinction between
tliia rite and that which he had used. In botli cases an
ancient custom of the Jews - appears to have been adopted,
signifying by a ceremony of ablution the cleansing away of
an old life for the purpose of beginning a new one, as a prose-
lyte to a new and a stricter faith. In the case of Jewish
baptisms the cliange signified was from heathenism to Judaism ;
in that l)y St. John and our Lord from a sinful life as Je«s to
a good life as the disciples of the Baptist or of Christ. This
significant use of water as the outward sign of admission to
a new spiritual condition ought doubtless to bo regarded as
a preparation, by tlie Providence of Ahnighty God, for the
Sacrament which was to be instituted by our Lord.
There were also certain verbal and typical preparations
made for that institution by our Blessed Lord Himself. At tlio
outset of His ministry occurred His interview with Nicodemua
1 *'John," says tho Vent-mble Bedc, "baptized wHli the baptism of
repentance to confession of sins and anieudnient of HIV-; and lie prearlied
tlie c