University of California College of Agriculture Agricultural Experiment Station Berkeley, California SEASONAL LABOR NEEDS FOR CALIFORNIA CROPS SOLANO COUNTY (Excluding Delta Lands) Progress Report No. 48 by R. L. Adams Preliminary — Subject to Correction November, 1936 Contribution from the Giannini Foundation of Agricultural Economics Mimeographed Report No. 53 UNIVERSITY OF CAL1F0RMA. LIBRARY BRANCH OF THE COLLEGE OF AGRICULTURE (Farm Labor Survey — July-December, 19-36) Frogress Report No. 48 Seasonal Labor Weeds of California Crops Solano County (Excluding Delta Lands) Scope cf I resentation . — The following considerations govern the presentation of this progress report: 1. The data are confined to the area indicated above. 2. The data are confined solely to crops, livestock needs being ignored. 3. The findings apply only to occasional or seasonal labor requirements as distinguished from labor contributed by farm operators and by workers employed on a year-round or regular basis of employment. 4. Attention is concentrated upon workers required for hand tasks — planting, thinning, weeding, hoeing, and harvesting — without including teamsters, tractor drivers, irrigators, and shed packers of vegetables or fruits. 5. The presentation includes the so-called migratory, transient, or roving workers which comprise an important source of help needed in connection with certain tasks and at "peak" times which seasonally arise in connection with many field, truck, and fruit crops commercially produced in California. 6. This report is confined to California's need for seasonal agricultural workers because of the more pressing problems liable to arise in connection there- with. A later study is planned which will deal with other kinds of labor involved in the production of California's many crops. Brief Description of the Area. — Solano County is one of the central counties of California, and is located about midway between the cities of San Francisco and Sacramento, and north of the mouth of the combined Sacramento and San Joaquin rivers, from their juactisn to San Fablo Bay. On the north it is bounded by Yolo County; and on the west by Napa County, the line following an irregular course along the Vaca Mountains. On the east and south it is separated from Sacramento and Contra Costa counties respectively, by the Sacramento River, which, after following a general southerly course, curves westward and joined by the San Joaquin River flows into the Bay. The county is ouite irregular in shape, its extreme dimensions being about 32 miles north and south by about 44 miles east and west. It has an area of 526,080 acres, of which 365,941 acres are classed as available for crops by the 1935 Census. This is further classified by the Census as follows: Crop land harvested Crop failure Crop land idle or fallow Flowable pasture Acreage 169,556 2,882 Total 43,482 150,021 365,941 (Note: This table includes the whole county, a portion of which lies in the Delta and is excluded from this report ) There are several agricultural districts in the area — one of these is the Suisun Valley, contiguous to the cities of Suisun and Fairfield, largely used for the production of fruits. It is about 4 .miles in width at the lower end, and extends for about 7 miles in length, becoming narrower as it approaches the upper end. Most of this district is under 100 feet in elevation above sea level. Another district, roughly 10 miles square, and lying in the southern part of the county, is known as the Montezuma Hills. It is quite rolling in topography, with elevations up to about 250 feet, and is extensively used for grain production. A third district, contiguous to Vacaville, is noted for fruit production. A fourth includes an area about 12 miles square in the vicinity of Dixon, which is largely used for alfalfa, grain and field crops. It is mostly under 75 feet in elevation, and quite flat in topography. The soils of the county are mostly of the heavier textures, ranging from loam and silty-olay loam to clay adobe. The valley soils, upon which most of the fruit is grown, are largely silty-clay loam, 6 feet or more in depth. The soils in the Montezuma Hills are heavier textured being mostly clay adobe from 3 to 6 feet in depth. Crops, Acreage, and Production . — The basis used in calculating occasional or seasonal need for labor, other than that furnished by farm operators and regularly employed workers appears as table 1. This table does not include that portion of the county which lies in the Delta, since the Delta, including portions of 5 counties, is considered as a separate unit in Progress Report No. 59, Due to lack of assembled data , acreage and production figures shown in table 1 are estimates based on information obtained from various sources. They are believed to represent conditions with a fair degree of accuracy. TABLE 1 Basis for Calculating Seasonal Labor Requirements — Solano County (Excluding Delta Lands) Crops Acreage Production Field crops: Alfalfa 5,600 33,600 tons Grain — wheat, barley, oats 82,000 Grain — sorghums* Hay (other than alfalfa) 16,000 20,000 tons Sugar beets 655 8,515 tons Vegetable crops: Tomatoes 692 4,844 tons Fruit and nut crops : Almonds 1,182 420 tons Apples* 25 Apricots 4,042 (6,500 tons dried (fresh weight) f (2,000 tons sold fresh Cherries 608.4 (120 tons barrelled Figs (mostly I'ission) (200 tons shipped 256 140 tons (dry weight) Grapes (table varieties) 504 2,000 tons (wine varieties) 1,056 4,000 tons Table continued on next page Table 1 continued Crops Acreage Production Fruit and nut crops : ( continued) Feaches (practically all freestone) Pears (mostly Bartlett)T Plums F runes Walnuts* 2,449 3,073 3,315 6,276 252 12,265 tons dried (fresh weight )t (4,000 tons sold fresh (2,250 tons dried (fresh weight)! 2,000 tons (152 cars) 16,000 tons (fresh weight)t 191,000 pounds
r* Tomatoes: Picking 1,958 tons 1,937 tons 1,000 tons 6.0 tons 1.25 tons 1.0 ton 327 1,550 1,000 24 24 16 14 65 63 (Oct. Prunes: Pruning 1,256 acres 0.25 acre 5,024 12 1-20) 419 (Oct. Burning brush 1,256 acres 4.0 acres 314 12 15-31) 27 (Oct. Totals Apricots: Pruning reaches 1, freestone ; : Pruning Pears: Pruning Burning brush Prunes: Pruning Burning brush 15-31) 8,683 24 362 man-months November 3,032 acres 612 acres 307 acres 307 acres 2,510 acres 2,510 acres 0.25 acre 0.25 acre 0.2 acre 4.0 acres 0.25 acre 4.0 acres 12,128 2,448 1,535 77 10 , 040 628 21 21 21 21 21 21 578 117 73 4 478 30 Totals 26,856 21 1,279 man-months December Apricots: Pruning Grapes: Pruning Peaches (freestone): Pruning Pears: Pruning Burning brush Plums: Pruning Prunes: Pruning Burning brush Totals 1,010 acres 168 acres 612 922 acres QPP ar-rpQ 166 acres 2,510 acres 2,510 acres 0.25 acre 0.75 acre 0.25 acre 0.2 acre 4.0 acres 0.5 acre 0.25 acre 4.0 acres 4,040 224 2,448 4,610 231 332 10,040 628 22,553 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 225 13 136 257 13 19 558 35 1,253 man-months * On a monthly basis unless otherwise noted. t Twenty per cent added to care for replanting. f Estimated portion of job done by seasonal workers. <$ Dry-yard labor, other than cutting, estimated as follows: Apricots — 11 man-hours per fresh ton. Figs — 40 man-hours per dry ton. Peaches — 11.5 man-hours per fresh ton. ^ Pears 26.5 man-hours per fresh ton. Prunes — 8.3 man-hours per fresh ton. " ■ f ■ * ■ 15. TABLE 4 Summary of Seasonal Labor Weeds by Months Solano County 1935 Month Required man-days of seasonal labor Available work days Required man-months of seasonal labor January 8,839 16 553 February 8,833 19 465 March 1,333 19 97 April 19,327 22 879 May 29,077 23 1,265 June 26,846 25 1,074 July 52,090 26 2,004 August 54,674 26 2,103 September 31,953 26 1,229 October 8,683 24 362 November 26,856 21 1,279 December 22,553 18 1,253 Total 291,564 12,563 I J 16. Motes Motes on Table 2 . — Data concerning "time of need" as shown in this table break down required seasonal labor into the period when the work is performed in order to permit a subsequent determination of labor needs by months (table 3). Some operations are performed only to a limited extent by seasonal workers. For instance, only about 80 per cent of the work in harvesting grain is estimated to have been done by seasonal workers. This having been done in two different months, a portion was assigned to each. The amount of work done each month is based on the cropping system followed during 1935. The allotting of amounts of work is based on findings concerning local farm practices and required time to "make" a crop resulting from inquiry of producers and records of carlot shipments* the latter proving helpful in fixing dates of plantings and of subsequent tasks involved in producing certain crops. Proportionate amounts of output harvested each month were determined from data of local practices with respect to harvesting, and from carlot shipments of perishable products. Records of truck shipments were also used when available. Motes on Table 5 . — Table 3 is the condensed summary of labor needs as worked out for Solano County as a result of findings pertinent to 1935. The data are presented by months with the tasks which were performed in each month indicated by both crop and task. The size of the job was calculated from the data appearing in table 1 (acreage and production) and table 2 (task, time of performance, and per- centage of work pertinent to a given month) . The output per man-day was calculated as indicated in the foreword presenting table 3. The number of required man-days is a result of dividing the size of task bv output per man-day. The available days for the different tasks involve two variables. The first is the number of days when field work is possible because of favorable weather conditions. The basis for this column was determined from a study of tho monthly weather charts of the United States Weather Bureau for the years 1933, 1934, and 1935. These data in- dicated available days per month as follows (based on a 26-day working month without allowance for holidays): Month Available Length of Month Available Length of days* work day days * work day hours hours January 16 9 July 26 10 February 19 9 August 26 10 March 19 10 September 26 10 April 22 10 October 24 10 May 23 10 November 21 9 June 25 10 December 13 9 * Based on precipitation records of tho Vacavillo station of the IT. S. Weather Bureau for the years 1933, 1934, and 1935. The second factor influencing the number of available days was the size of the job. If tho output was small in amount, "then the number of days was limited to the time needed to do the work efficiently. If a field operation had to be per- formed in a period less than the number of available days in tho month, then the specific number of days was noted. These restrictions are shown in parentheses. For example, in May the thinning of apricots was limited to 11 days in the first- 17. half of the month; cherry picking for canning to 15 days, etc. The totals of table 3 show the total required man-days of needed seasonal labor, the available days for field work during the month, and the number of men (as defined in the opening paragraph of table 3) required on a monthly basis to care for the tasks ordinarily performed by seasonal workers. In an area such as Solano County, involving a substantial area of field and truck crops, the findings as set forth in this report are bound to fluctuate materially from year to year, because of the influence of market outlook upon what and how much acreage is planted, and when it is planted; because of variable seasonal conditions affecting yields, time of performing operations, and available days; and because of harvesting operations on certain crops being speeded up to supply a good market or retarded to avoid a poor one, resulting in marked variations in the need for harvest labor. » 4 > i