THE PROVINCE LAWS ilifornia ional ility THE PROVINCE LAWS THEIR VALUE, AND THE PROGRESS OF THE NEW EDITION. BOSTON: CUPPLES, UPHAM & CO., PUBLISHERS. THE OLD CORNER BOOKSTORE. 1885. PKKSS OF DAVID CLAPP & SON. PREFACE. THE author of this pamphlet was for more than twenty years a fellow townsman, and during the years 1861 and 1862 a student at law, of the late Ellis Ames, senior editor, after the death of Gov. Clifford, of the Province Laws, now being reprinted by authority of the Commonwealth. Having from childhood taken a deep interest in local history, and having enjoyed exceptional opportunities of observing the devotion with which his departed friend labored to collect and preserve for public use the rare and fading pages of the legislation of the Colony and Province, upon which our state super- structure is erected, he naturally took some interest in the work. He frequently listened to the conversations between Gov. Clifford and Mr. Ames upon the subject, and well remembers the large bossed safe and the antique bookshelves that held the rare old jewels, that, covered with dust and liable any day to be burned, adorned one side of this musty old office. Again, some two years ago the writer heard a distinguished anti- quary, a resident of New York City, in the course of conversation say, "That the great object of his life was to complete his set of Massachusetts early laws." The next express that went to New York carried over twelve hundred pages of Acts and Resolves, Journals of the House, Perpetual and Temporary Laws, passed be- tween the years 1684 and 1779. Since this article was commenced the writer has been informed that the set, owned by his own state, was not complete, and that three pages of this collection, given out of the state if for sale to-day, would bring their weight in diamonds. He deeply regrets that the few hundred pages he now has, are not of equal value. Havino- had occasion to frequently use the volumes of the Province Laws which have been published, and gleaning much material of historical value from them, it was with some surprise that he read the doubt expressed in the recent message of Gov. George D. Robinson, as to how far the work is to be carried, and what amount of money is "reasonably proper" to continue the undertaking. Whether the doubt arises from unfamiliarity with the subject, whether the Governor has been led to believe that some other department can use this money to better advantage, or whether, if retrenchment must come, there will be less of a contest with histo- rians than with politicians, we are not informed. The Governor has simply called the attention of the Legislature to the question whether the expense of the work is disproportionate to its usefulness. No one having come forward to give to the public those details in relation to the purposes of the work, which the citizens have a right to know, and in which it may be reasonably supposed, in view of the prominence which the Governor has given to the subject, they would be likely to take an interest, the writer offers this pamphlet to supply, as far as in his ability lies, the information withheld in His Excellency's Address. In publishing these pages the author has a two-fold satisfaction : first, it gives him an opportunity to pay a tribute to the memory of a profound, laborious, and useful worker in the law, who was more eager to obtain and impart knowledge than to seek position or parade his achievements, a dear, kind hearted friend for nearly a quarter of a century. And secondly, to give his fellow citizens some idea of the value and progress of a work, the importance of which may be estimated, when it is known that even to the legal profession it is the revelation of a body of laws, imposed upon us by the constitution, but of which even our judges have had no knowledge, except what they have obtained from a few experts who enjoyed a monopoly in this branch of learning, by having spent their lives in accumulating and becom- ing at last the fortunate possessors of two or three sets of the early laws, none of which were complete. DANIEL T. V. HUNTOON. Canton, Feb. 20, 1885. PROVINCE LAWS. IN the recent message of Gov. George D. Robinson, the following paragraph appears under the heading " Provincial Laws." "In 1865 and 1867 authority to publish the acts and laws of the Prov- ince of Massachusetts Bay was given, and to the present time four volumes have been issued and distributed, and another volume is in the hands of the printer. The expenditures, authorized by appropriations from year to year, amount now to $77,505.75. The work, without doubt, has been well done ; but would it not be well to inquire what limit to its extent and cost is reasonably proper? The Governor and Council, to whom the authority for publication is committed, can exercise but little discretion in this matter, in view of the grauts of money made by the Legislature from time to time." The resolve of 1865 alluded to by the Governor, authorized the appointment of three or more commissioners, " to prepare for publi- cation a complete copy of the statutes and laws of the Province and State of Massachusetts Bay, from the time of the Province Charter to the adoption of the Constitution of the commonwealth, including all the session acts, private and public, general and special, tempo- rary and perpetual, passed from time to time by the General Court; all incorporations of towns and parishes, and all other legislative acts of legal or historic importance, appearing on the records of the General Court, with suitable marginal references to the statutes and judicial decisions of the Province and Commonwealth ; the orders of the King in Council, and to such other authorities as, in their opinion, may enhance the value and usefulness of the work; and to append to the same a complete index." The commissioners appointed under this resolve, were presumed to be the best that could be selected in the state ; they were men prominent in their profession. The first commissioner named was John H. Clifford, who as Gover- nor had shown his love for the state by calling the attention of his council to the decayed and perishing condition of the oldest records, and in a special message on the twelfth of February, 1853, recom- mended and strongly urged the printing of the two oldest volumes, that comprised the records of about twenty years of our political existence. From his practice at law, he knew the vast importance of saving from destruction the ancient laws of the state that had honored him with its highest gift, and for his labor on the Prov- ince Laws deserves the thanks of all students of law. history and philosophy. , Next in order came Ellis Ames, of Canton, who has died within the past year, of whom an eminent lawyer says in "Every Other Satur- day," under date of December 6, 1884 "Ellis Ames was decidedly at the^head of the Norfolk* and Plymouth Bars, He was re- puted the best equity lawyer in the state, and in special pleading, and in the old learning of the common law, he was considered a great man. His preparation of his cases was most exhaustive ; he left no loopholes, and ho made few bldnders, he was learned, strong and honest." It should be recorded, because so uncommon now-a days, that he never gave a friend one of these volumes of the Province Laws, without paying for it out of his own pocket. Mr. Ellis Ames was selected as a member of the commission, be- cause he had been for many years, what might well have been called, the "right bower" of Ihe Supreme Court, in all matters pertaining to the Colonial and Provincial Laws; the judges were dependent on him, for he made a study of the ancient law and was thoroughly proficient in it. He had spent forty years of his life, travelled hun- dreds of miles, in order to collect books and pamphlets relating to the subject, and when any matter of grave importance, involving obscure points of legal history, came up, his decision settled it. Be- fore Mr. Ames's day this position was accorded to Nathan Dane; before him, to Judge Edmund Trowbridge, an eminent lawyer, Attorney General and Judge of the Superior Court of Judicature, during the period of the Revolution. Before Trowbridge, John Read, commonly called " the father of the Common Law." All the above mentioned were eminent and profound lawyers, who were familiar with these early laws. While the Essex Institute's collection ~of the Provincial Statutes was rare and valuable, especially in the earliest Session acts, Mr. Ames's collection was more complete and more methodically arranged, embracing (1) The Session acts down to 1699, the date of the first revision. (2) The edition of 1699 with supplements to 1714, the date of the second revision. (3) /The edition of 1714 with supple- ments to 1726, the date of the third edition. (4) The edition of 1726 with supplements to 1742, the date of the fourth edition. (5) The edition, Temporary and Perpetual, of 1742, with supplements to 1755. Of the editions of 1699, 1714, 1726, 1742, 1755, 1759, 1763, Temporary and Perpetual, with the supp'cments to each, only one other set approaching this in completion is known to exist, and was * See Appendix A. perfected since this set was sold to the state. It is in the Lenox Library in New York, and the writer believes that the splendid Psalmomm Codex printed by Faust and Schoeff in 1459, sold recently for X4.950, would not be taken in exchange for it. We know that the Mazarin bible that was sold at the same sale for 3,900 would have been no inducement, for they have already a copy for which they only paid in 1848 500. When a New York man like Mr. Lenox gives more than $2,000,000, and a private collection of books, the rare bibles and testaments of which alone are worth $100,000, and which he had been more than forty years collecting, to found a library for the use of students in special subjects in the city of New York, when he, or after his death, when the eminent historian, whom he honored with the guardianship of his trust, George H. Moore, LL.D., places such a value on'the rubbish of New England attics, how long will it be before we must go 'to New York to learn our own history ? And yet, although the set of Mr. Ames was considered perfect, the diligent, active and energetic commissioners have added to the new edition of the Province Laws one ^hundred and thirty-seven public, and thirty-two private acts that were not contained in Mr. Ames's collection. The only surviving member of this commission Is Abner Cheney Goodell, Jr., upon whom, from the beginning, has fallen all the detail of the work, being the youngest, having been appointed when only thirty-three years of age. His^tanding was remarkably good, as a lawyer. He was admitted to the bar at the age of twenty-one, and soon built up a very large practice, extending beyond his own 1 county, to Suffolk and Norfolk counties, as the dockets of the old Court of Common Pleas and Superior Court of Suffolk, and of the Supreme Judicial Court, will show. Such was his position, when the solicitation of his friends, his love of historic law, and the mandate of the Governor influenced him to devote himself to the preparation of these volumes of " The Province Laws." His contributions to history show marvellous research ; his mono- graphs on " The Court Seals " and " Witchcraft " are well known, and have, in connection with the " Notes " on the latter subject, by perhaps the greatest historian in New York, George H. Moore, LL.D., brought out a mass of new material, which illumined by such accurate, pains-taking, and learned men, throws a clear, white, one might say, an electric light, into those dark and dismal ages of tho past. Mr. Goodell was appointed, perhaps, because he held the post of Vice President of the Essex Institute, in the department of history. He is a member of the Massachusetts Historical Society, a life mem- ber of the New England Historic Genealogical Society, and corres- ponding member of the New York, New Hampshire, and Rhode Island Historical Societies. The commissioners of 1811, Dane, 8 Story and Prescott, were all members of the Essex County Historical Society, which was merged in the Institute ; and the library of the latter contained the ancient volumes of the Province Laws used by the commissioners before named in compiling the edition of 1811. These books the present commissioners have made the best use of, with the consent of the Essex Institute, even cutting them up as copy for the printers. Soon after the appearance of the first volume of this series of Province Laws, it was said of Mr. Goodell, that " his persistent study at home and correspondence with England, involving an amount of ingenious labor and thought, which but few appreciate, has helped to a completeness and thoroughness before unattained." Mr. Goodell, it is well known, has often been consulted by law writers, historians and judges, in this and other states, on recondite matters of law, re- quiring historical research. Such were the men selected to undertake the publication of the Province Laws, and who have, with absolute fidelity, with the highest conceptions of professional and public duty, continued while life was spared, to save for us and posterity, in well arranged, well printed but not expensive books, the musty records of our noble Common- wealth, that might at any hour have been destroyed by fire. Do I anticipate the comment of my reader, familiar with political affairs of the day, if at this point he exclaims, " All very true, but how much money did they get out of it?" In the year 1853 the Commonwealth resolved that the Massachu- setts Colony Records should be printed, as requested by Gov. Clifford. The cost of preparing and printing these five volumes was $41,834.44.* Two years later, from fear that the Ancient Records of Plymouth Colony might be destroyed by fire, they were ordered to be copied and printed. The wisdom of this measure will be very apparent to those who witnessed the condition of the floor of the Plymouth Court House, after the fire which occurred there within a year or two. The Plymouth Records consisted of twelve volumes, which, with the five previously printed, completed the two colonies. For printing these twelve volumes, there was paid the sum of $47,117.66.f The total cost of preparing and printing the Province Laws, is as follows, 7T,255,75.| The reader will see that the amount paid to Mr. A. C. Goodell, Jr., in the above statement, is $11,837.13. Now this represents, let it be remembered, twenty years of labor when next June comes ; not work, from ten till four o'clock in the day time, but from early morning to five in the afternoon, then home, and work again at night; and his average yearly salary has amounted to the enormous sum of * For Items, see Appendix B. f For Items, see Appendix C. % For Items, see Appendix D. less than six hundred dollars a year. It would be interesting to compare this amount with some of the officers, who attend the State House during the session only, or even the gentlemen who answer bell calls. Let us for a moment compare the two publications. In the first place, the number of words in the iwelve volumes of the Ply- mouth and Massachusetts Colony Records is estimated at 2,683,846, while the number of words in the six* volumes of the Province Laws, including the reprint of volume 2, which was destroyed by fire, so far is more than 4,500,000, of which 1,100,000 are editorial notes, procured either in the Public Record Office in London, or by the most laborious and exhaustive research in the poorly indexed files and volumes in the State Archives, numbering in all about four hun- dred immense volumes, folios and manuscripts. The history of each act, as far as it could be discovered by this research, is given in the notes, at the end of the acts of each year, and a flood of new light is thereby thrown upon the laws and history of the Province. Again, while it has been the purpose of the editor to make these notes clear, in every passage that might by any possibility be mis- construed, he has condensed them as much as possible, consistent with a due regard to making his statements understood, and they are in many instances more valuable than the text itself. The records of towns and parishes, the pages of unpublished con- temporary journals, and printed histories, have been made to con- tribute to the work ; and the public records of each county, existing before the Revolution, have been personally examined and referred to, when necessary, by the commissioners. The acts have not only been compared, letter by letter, with the original engrossments, when the engrossments could be found, but also with the contemporaneous impressions of the acts, and all differ- ences carefully noted. The result of this research has been the restoration of three hun- dred and sixty-seven acts, the engrossments of which had, in the course of time, been lost from the Secretary's office, and one hundred arid thirty-seven acts which are not to be found in any other printed collection. Finally, it should be remembered, that when some of these volumes were passing through the press, during the period just after the war, the price of composition, press-work, paper and binding, was at its highest. On the other hand, the first six volumes of the Plymouth Colony Records had no editorial work done on them ; the editor in his in- troductory remarks, writes, "In the performance of his duty, the editor has studiously avoided making comments upon the subject * See Appendix E. 10 matter of the records." The editor, therefore, according to his own showing, was merely a proof reader, who compared his sheets with a single original manuscript. The cost of the twelve volumes of the Plymouth and Massachu- setts Records was $88,962.10. The cost of the Province Laws is $77,505.75. Compare either of these with the cost of the Public Statutes, which, if I am rightly informed, cost $99,687.61, and what was the editorial work on that ? Compare it with the editorial work on the Memoir of Hon. Charles Sumner. The whole cost is considerably less than the extra or " contingent " expenses of the Council and Executive for the same period, if the Auditor's statement for January, 1884, is a fair average. The com- parison might be extended to either one of the Justices of the Supe- rior Court for their services alone ; while here we have the volumes, besides the labor involved. One thing is clear: If the commissioners' labors began in 1865, when authority was first given for the work, according to the Gover- nor's statement, their expenditures thus far have not exceeded $4,000 a year, for salaries of commissioners and clerks, stationery and inci- dentals, as well as for composition, stereotyping, press-work, binding, and supplying to every town in the state the four volumes already distributed, and for defraying all the cost thus far of a fifth volume nearly completed. I cannot believe that the people of Massachusetts are going to consider the cost of this edition of the Province Laws as burden- some, when they understand the matter. Four thousand a year would be about four mills per capita throughout the state. Will the citizens of Boston, who pay forty-two per cent, of the State tax, refuse to contribute $1,680, less than one junketing bill, to have the old records preserved and made available for use, or is it more advantageous to spend it for wine and cigars. The City of Boston has done nobly in perpetuating her own records. Ten vol- umes, containing an enormous amount of information, have been dis- tributed throughout the country; and antiquaries, historians and lawyers are no longer subject to the inconvenience and loss of time it used to take, to consult the original unindexed records. One can always find a copy at the public libraries throughout the state, and some individuals are fortunate enough to own a set. If one thinks the Province Laws are valueless, buy a set, keep it twenty years, and, with the plates of the first volume burned, judging from our know- ledge of the value of earlier editions, they will bring a very large price. In order that the Governor may better understand the scope of this work, we shall endeavor to show what value was placed by his illustrious predecessors upon the Province Laws, what efforts they made to save them, and preserve, in the best manner, a collection of 11 statutes which should show, in chronological sequence, the develop- ment of our legislation. At the same time it will not be amiss to place on record, the money value which individual searchers place on these musty, faded, yellow pages. It may help us all to realize the value of the new edition a hundred years from now. During the period of the first charter, between the years 1628 and 1691, three editions of the laws were published, in 1648, 1660, 1672. A single copy of the edition of 1648, if it could be found, would easily bring ten thousand dollars, and persons are known to the writer who will pay that amount for it to-day. Copies of the editions of 1660 and 1672, with the supplements complete, are worth as much as " Eliot's Indian Bible " or the " Bay Psalin Book." Of the two copies of this edition in Boston, one at the State Library and one at the Athenaeum, neither are complete, as both lack supplements. During the time of the second charter, between 1692 and 1774, Sir William Phipps, on the sixteenth of December, 1692, ordered the " Acts and Laws made by the Great and General Court, or Assembly, of this their Majesty's Province of the Massachusetts Bay in New England, to be printed, that so the people might be informed there- of ;" and it was done. In 1713, the Governor, Council, and Assembly ordered the Acts and Laws, since the second charter, to be reprinted, and it was done the following year; but a copy with the supple- ments is rare now-a-days; and yet it was distributed in all the towns of the Province, as this new edition will be in all the towns of the Commonwealth. In 1726 another reprint was issued, with supplements running to 1742; a perfect copy, with its whole number of seven hundred and eighty-nine pages, would set a biblophile wild. In August, 1742, the laws were again revised and reprinted in two volumes; one of Temporary and one of Perpetual Laws; the former were continued, with supplements, up to 1755, and the latter until 1760. A perfect copy of either is rarely seen, owing to the loss of the supplements. In 1752 Lieut. Gov. Phips reminded the Council and Represen- tatives that many of the laws were " obsolete and others by frequent additions, amendments and alterations are rendered difficult to be understood and variously construed and practised upon." Again in a letter to the Lords of Trade, under date of Jan. 24, 1753, he says: " I am not to confine you to any particular form in your proceeding, but I must recommend to you a plau which has been executed by one of His Majesty's other Govern' 8 with very good success, a Copy of which shall also be laid before you. It is generally allowed that there is no juster way of forming a Judgment of the wisdom of any People than by their body of Laws; it behoves you the -efore to give the greatest attention to what I now propose to you, and as it is a work that will require much time and close application you cannoi too soon engage upon it." 12 Later Gov. Shirley made a speech on the necessity of a revision of the laws, fully setting forth the advantages of such a work, and arguing against numerous objections which the members of the As- sembly, who had no idea of the value the work would be to pos- terity, were ready to offer. On August 21, 1756, the Governor sent the following message to the Council and House : " I have repeatedly recommended to former assemblies the appointing a committee to revise the laws of this Province, the particular plan of which has been laid before those assemblies, and may now be found in your files. I cannot permit this court to rise without again urging a consideration of this matter, it appears to me a matter of great moment; besides the inac- curacy of some of your laws, there are many which militate one with another, and others are expressed in ambiguous terms, so as to render the construc- tion various and frequently altering; all which is not only dishonorable to the legislature but must be of bad consequence to the people of the govern- ment. You must be convinced, Gentlemen, that I have nothing in view but the real advantage of the Province, and I hope you will engage in the affair without delay." In 1755 the Temporary Laws, then in force, were printed, and continued by the addition of supplements to 1763, when another edition was prepared, which was continued by supplements down to the time of the Revolution. None of those can be picked up in " Ye Antique Bookstore." In 1759 an edition of the Perpetual Laws then in force was printed, and supplements to it were published each session up to 1774. Many attempts were made in pre-rcvolutionery days by the patriots to revise the Provincial Laws, supply omissions and correct errors. This most interesting period of our history, the embryonic era, is most fully set forth in these law books, for, in addition to the Acts of the Province, all the Acts of Parliament, which led to the out- break of the Revolution, are usually bound up with them. In 1771 James Otis reported, in behalf of a committee, that "they find a great number of the standing laws omitted in the last impres- sion, and some in the impression of the last but one of the Perpetual Laws, and also some laws left out of the last impression of the Temporary Laws, and that it was absolutely necessary to have a new edition of the Perpetual and Temporary Laws of the Province." This however failed to meet the approval of Hutchinson, not only Governor, but Chief Justice, as will appear by the following letter, now for the first time printed, dated at Boston, March 20, 1773, and addressed to Lord Dartmouth. " I am obliged also to acquaint your Lordship that a vote has passed the two Houses both in this and the former Session for a new impression of the Province laws which have been some time out of Print. I think that printing the laws may very properly be claimed as part of the Prerogative, but in the Colonies it is attended with expences, as no Printer will under- 13 take it unless a sufficient number of books be engaged and therefore in this Colony, and I believe generally, it has been done by a vote of the General Court originated with the Representatives, and the care of the impression left with a Committee, and I refused my assent to these votes because I found it to be the declaration of one or more of the members of the House that none of the Acts of Parliament which are printed with the Province Laws should be brought into the new impression. I should have thought it of less importance if it had not evidently proceeded from the denial of the authority of those and all other Acts of Parliament which immediately respect us, and I think myself obliged to mention it to your Lordship as a proof of a fixed resolution to avoid acknowledging the supremacy of Parliament." After the adoption of the Constitution in 1780, a compilation of the most important of the unrepealed laws of the Province was pre- pared, under a resolve of February 28, 1799, by a committee ap- pointed to edit the laws. It was issued in 1801, and in 1807 it was so scarce that it was reprinted. In 1814 this edition was in turn exhausted, and another and more complete collection of the Laws of the Colony and Province appeared, under the title of " The Charters and General Laws of the Colony and Province of Massachusetts Bav." This volume contained the acts passed during the Revolution ; the labor was performed by the late Hon. James Savage, under the direction of Nathan Dane, Judge Story and Judge Prescott, who were the commissioners, selected by the highest wisdom of this era in our history, as the most capable and learned in the State ; this book has been out of print for years. This edition of 1814 contained only eight hundred and sixteen pages of Laws of the Colony and Province, covering a period of one hundred and fifty years, while the first volume of the Province Laws, of the edition now in press, covering only twenty-two years, makes a volume of over nine hundred pages. The following examples will show the value of the new light thrown upon legal matters in this ably edited book, The Province Laws. In Vol. I. p. 172, in the margin, reference is made to I. Gray, p. 1 19, where neither court nor counsel finding authority "that the age of consent, in marriage, as fixed by the common law, is the rule iii 5 force in this Commonwealth, the court decided in an elaborate opinion that the common law rule prevailed here on general princi- ples, there being no rule established by statute." But by the publi- cation of this book it appears that there was actually an unrepealed act of the Province conclusive on the point, the knowledge of which would have saved both court and counsel much useless research, and that the age of consent was, for a man, fourteen years ; for a woman, twelve. See Act, 1694-5, chap. 5, 5. Mr. Goodell has an elaborate note in Vol. I. p. 363, in which it appears that our copy of the Province charter of 1692 provides that "electors shall possess property to the value of forty pounds ster- 14 ling," while the original required y*/ty. This error found its way into theprecepts for the choice of representatives, and invalidated all proceedings made under it, as not according to the charter. Again in the Commonwealth vs. Manning, Dane's General Abridg- ment and Digest of American Law, Vol. III. chap. 71, Art. 5, Sec. 8-10, the following statements appear: " It was said that this was clearly an indictment at common law by ob- structin