ENGINEERING LIBRARY A GRAPHICAL TREATMENT OF THE INDUCTION MOTOR ""0 Translated from the Second Edition G. H. ROWE and R. E. HELLMUND NEW YORK McGraw Publishing Company 1906 &NGINEERIMG LIBRARY Copyrighted, 1906, oy tne McGRAW PUBLISHING COMPANY New York CONTENTS. PAGE Introduction 1 General Theory 1 Diagrams of the Induction Motor. 5 Current Diagram 6 Field Diagram 7 Circle Diagram 8 Determination of Input, etc., from the Diagram 10 Friction and Iron Losses 10 Copper Losses 10 Electrical Input 13 Torque 13 Output 14 Slip 14 Electrical Efficiency 15 Practical Application of the Diagram 17 Note on Correction to be Applied 22 Examples 23 2 H.P. Motor 24 7 H.P. Motor 29 12 H.P. Motor. 33 Induction Motor as Generator 34 Single Phase Motor. 36 838991 A GRAPHICAL TREATMENT OF THE INDUCTION MOTOR. The object of the method described in the following pages is the experimental determination of the charac- teristic properties of induction motors. It consists es- sentially in the practical application of the circle dia- gram, first described by the writer in 1894.* It is based on two simple and quickly performed experimen- tal tests on the finished motor. The method shows at a glance the main properties of a motor and its commercial excellence. The writer has used the circle diagram several years in the testing room for comparing calculated values with results ob- tained from tests, and it has well served its purpose. Before describing the method and its applications, perhaps I may be allowed to present briefly the theory of the induction motor, and the derivation cf the diagram. GENERAL THEORY OF THE INDUCTION MOTOR. The induction motor is in principle a transformer. The exciting member A (Fig. 1) represents the inducing or primary circuit ; the short-circuited member B repre- *Elektrotechnische Zeitschrift, Oct. 11, 1894, p. 561. 1 2 THE INDUCTION MOTOR. sents the induced or secondary circuit. The alter- nating fields produced by the current in the exciting coils combine in the well known manner to form a rotating field. The motor is, therefore, a transformer with a rotating field, and the load of the system is deter- mined at any time by the difference between the con- stant speed of rotation of the field produced in the stationary member .4, and that of the rotating short- circuited member B. The turning of the rotor is due FIG. 1. to the torque existing between the rotating field and the currents produced in the short-circuited member by rotation in the field. These currents, and therefore also the torque, vary directly with the product of the slip and the field interlinked with the secondary con- ductors. The slip is defined as the difference between the speed of rotation of the exciting field, and that of the short-circuited secondary. The variation of the slip in THE INDUCTION MOTOR. 3 the induction motor has the same significance as the variation of load of the ordinary transformer, due to a change of its external resistance. With constant impressed electromotive force, the field produced by the current in the primary winding is constant for all loads, as in the transformer. This, however, is not true in the short-circuited member, which is the real work transmitting element. Herein lies the essential difference between the induction motor and the transformer without leakage, in which, as is well known, the total primary field passes through the secondary. Since there must, of necessity, be an air- gap between the short circuited windings and the pri- mary windings, not all of the magnetic lines < induced in the primary member pass through into the secondary. But a part s passes directly through the space be- tween the two windings back into the primary mem- ber, and only the difference < A = A is given by the difference between the main field and the leakage field < A = < - * (Fig. 2), and is pro- FIG. 2. duced by the difference between the ampere turns of the primary and secondary circuits. If we call the resulting magnetizing current, I, and the reluctance of the path of the secondary field p, then / < A x- This magnetizing current is thus not constant, as in the transformer, but decreases with increasing load since with increasing load the current 7 t and therefore c6c increases. A will therefore decrease. THE INDUCTION MOTOR. j If no current is produced in the secondary mem- ber, the primary winding carries only the magnetizing current, and therefore the primarv current equals the magnetizing current, or /--/ This occurs when the motor is running unloaded, and the slip is zero. As the load increases, we have the following phe- nomena: The slip increases, and with it the electro- motive force induced in the secondary member, and the current 7 2 resulting therefrom increases. This secondary current 7 2 exerts a demagnetizing effect on the field, and therefore causes, as in the transformer, a corresponding increase of the current in the primary member. The demagnetizing influence of the current 7 2 acts only on the armature field. The strength of the leakage field increases, however, in direct ratio with the increase of the primary current. Therefore, the increase of the load, and the increase of the secondary current, have the following consequences: (1) The secondary field is decreased by the demag- netizing action of 7 2 . (2) Indirectly, the leakage field is increased, due to an increase of 7 X . Thus, the leakage field is directly proportional to I v The armature field equals the difference between the main and leakage fields, and therefore the sum of the armature field and leakage field must be equal to the main field and constant. DIAGRAM OF THE INDUCTION MOTOR. As in the well known transformer diagram, the pri- mary current, and the secondary current in the short- circuited secondary, can be represented by two sides 6 THE INDUCTION MOTOR. of a triangle (Fig. 3), of which the resulting third side is the magnetizing current 7. This magnetizing current produces the secondary field, which interlinks with both the exciting and short- circuited windings. The secondary field produces the currents in the short-circuited secondary; it being in fact the only field which passes into the secondary. The secondary currents, therefore, lag exactly a quarter period behind the secondary field. As shown before, the main difference between the transformer without leakage and the induction motor, lies in the fact that Impressed E.M.F. FIG. 3. the magnitude of the magnetizing current changes, and that the current triangle changes its position. We know (Fig. 3) that the constant main field, which induces a counter electromotive force corresponding to the impressed electromotive force is at right angles to the impressed electromotive force in a circuit without resistance, and without iron losses. Under these con- ditions, in a transformer without leakage, the magnet- izing current is therefore at right angles to the im- pressed electromotive force, and is constant. Further, the current triangle always has the same relative position to the electromotiv? force. THE INDUCTION MOTOR 7 In the induction motor, nowever, the main field must be resolved into two parts. One part, the leakage field, is in phase with the primary current, and proportional to it. The other part, the secondary field, must there- fore be variable, and cannot be in phase with the main field. The magnetizing current which produces this secondary field, must therefore vary in amplitude and direction. It is possible to follow these changes by the graphical combination of the fields (Fig. 4). The diagram proposed by the writer is based on Impressed E.M.F. FIG. 4. these assumptions, and is represented in Fig. 5. The leakage field is directly proportional to the pri- mary current, and in phase with it, or s oc^- = AC' Ps Thus, we can represent the leakage field according to a definite scale by the vector AC' = I r The main field may be represented by a line A D, constant in 8 THE INDUCTION MOTOR. magnitude and in quadrature with the electromotive force. The third side C' D, must therefore give the second- ary field, or < A = = C'L> and C' D must be in quadrature with c' C' = / 2 , and D Impressed E.M.F. FIG. 5. parallel with A c' = I. Further, there must be a con- stant relation between C' D and A c' according to an equation previously given, or C'D_ I ~A T ~ T~ & Ac' I o In order to satisfy this equation when the load changes, the points c' and C' must move on the two THE INDUCTION MOTOR. 9 half circles represented in Fig. 5. The angles A c' C and C C' D are always right angles, and the ratio C'D . - - is constant. We see from the figure that the current cannot in- crease indefinitely, even if we assume the resistance to be zero. It reaches a maximum when C' coincides with D, or I, = AD. The leakage field, which is then represented by the line A D, equals in intensity the main field, and the remaining part, the secondary field, becomes zero. In this case /! AD (h = (h OC - OC PS Ps Let us study now the condition for minimum current. The minimum current flows when the motor is run- ning without load. In this case 7 2 = 0, and therefore /j = the magnetizing current, or 7 t = / = A C, and I I, AC d> oc oc oc P P P or, since < remains constant, we have the relation: Maximum current A D p s Minimum current AC p reluctance of leakage path reluctance of path of secondary field The above considerations may be briefly stated as follows: In induction motors the relation between the JO THE INDUCTION MOTOR. electromotive force and the current can be represented by a vector diagram. In this diagram, the vector representing the current, which, as we know, varies with the load, is determined by the fact that its end point moves in a circle; the position of which is given by the ratio A D jOs _ reluctance of leakage path AC p reluctance of path of secondary field DETERMINATION OF INPUT, OUTPUT, TORQUE AND SLIP. So far, we have investigated current magnitudes and phase differences only. To utilize the diagram, prac- tically, and to determine from it the operation and commercial excellence of a motor, we must introduce the friction, iron losses, and especially the electrical losses. The friction and iron losses can be considered con- stant, since the speed of the motor and the field be- tween no load and full load are practically constant. The iron losses of the short-circuited secondary can be neglected on account of the low frequency of its field. We shall see later that the exciting field does not remain quite constant, but is somewhat reduced by the ohmic drop in the primary circuit. On the other hand, the iron losses in the secondary increase slightly with the load, due to increasing slip. These variations will almost neutralize each other, so that the total :'ron losses are approximately constant. It is quite different with the copper losses. As is well known, these are proportional to the square of the current. For this reason, it is very difficult to represent them directly in the diagram. We shall see however, that their influence appears in another form, THE INDUCTION MOTOR. 11 viz., by weakening the field, whereby they may be very readily considered. The ohmic drop of the pri- mary winding I^xR^ (7 t = current, and R^ = ohmic resistance of primary circuit) opposes the primary im- pressed electromotive force, and consequently the field does not need to induce a counter electromotive force equal to the impressed, but one equal to the difference between the impressed electromotive force and the drop. It follows that the main field, inducing the counter-electromotive force, and, therefore, also the secondary field, will be decreased by an amount corre- sponding to the ohmic drop. The diagram was, how- ever, constructed on the assumption of a constant main field. Yet the omission of the loss of potential, due to resistance, does not change the correctness of the diagram, since, instead of the drop, we can intro- duce an equivalent field, which may finally be sub- tracted from the resulting seconda^ field. Since an electromotive force always corresponds to a field at right angles to itself, and is proportional to it, we may take the ohmic drop into consideration by a reduction of the field proportional to and at right angles to the drop, that is at right angles to the direc- tion of the current. Thus, we arrive at correct results if we consider the main field constant in our diagram, and finally decrease the secondary field by an amount corresponding to the drop in potential. In the diagram, the primary current A C' may be resolved into two components, A C and C C' t of which the no load component A C causes a constant drop. The other component C C' is variable, and causes a drop in potential which appears in the form of a dimi- nution of the field

C k . 2. As a generator j slip < ) _^_^k 3. As a generator ( slip > 1 I With these general diagrams and curves, all essential points of the use of the present method are exhausted. All complicated details of the motor are based on two phenomena, magnetic leakage and electric resistance. These are essentially the only values which determine the operation of the motor, and it remains for the designer to choose the proper proportions. SINGLE PHASE MOTORS. The fundamental theory of the polyphase motor is much simplified by the introduction of the principle of the rotating field, but the theory of the single-phase motor is somewhat more difficult. THE INDUCTION MOTOR. 37 38 THE INDUCTION MOTOR. The single-phase motor possesses a single phase winding for a simple alternating current (Fig. 19), and can therefore produce a simple alternating field in the direction of the coil axis only. Such a field, of course, will not cause rotation of a short-circuited armature, without commutator or similar devices. Therefore it seems, at first thought, somewhat astonishing, that such a motor can operate at all, and indeed, in its FIG. 19. simplest form such a motor will not start; however, after the motor has been started by any means what- soever, it then operates exactly like a polyphase motor. This phenomenon is explained by the fact that in the single phase motor, rotating at a certain speed, there is a field caused in the secondary which rotates with it. Between this field and the ampere turns of the single phase winding, a torque is established in the same manner as between the field of a short-circuited second- THE INDUCTION MOTOR. 39 ary and one of the two or three phase windings of the polyphase motor. The torque, however, is pulsat- ing, since there is no second phase, and it becomes a maximum, falls to zero and again reaches a maximum varying with the alternations of the field. In the case of induction motors, single as well as poly- phase, we may consider the short-circuited secondary as a field magnet of a synchronous motor. The only difference is that the field does not rotate in the in- duction motor in synchronism with the armature, but has a small relative rotation with respect to the arma- ture, corresponding to the slip. In the short-circuited secondary of a single-phase motor there exists, just as in the polyphase motor, a constant rotating field notwithstanding the fact that the current exciting winding produces only a simple alternating field. This is explained by the character- istic property of the short-circuited winding. We know that any short-circuited winding tends strongly to keep up the field interlinked with it, since any change in this field causes current in the short-circuited wind- ing which opposes such change. This counteracting effect is the larger the lower the resistance of the wind- ing and the greater the frequency. If we consider the secondary of a single phase motor revolving synchronously, the primary alternating field will not appear as an alternating field in the secondary, since in the same time, during which the field intensity starting from zero reaches a maximum and decreases again to zero, the secondary has turned through 180, and the primary alternating field will therefore appear as a pulsating field, and will have always the same direction in regard to the secondary member. Each pulsation of the secondary field causes, how- 40 THE INDUCTION MOTOR. ever, in the secondary winding wattless currents which diminish the pulsation to a negligible minimum, i.e,, they keep the pulsating field of the short-circuited secondary practically constant. In the positions where the field corresponding to the exciting current tends to exceed this constant value, the secondary ampere turns demagnetize. In other positions they furnish the magnetizing current. FIG. 20. FIG. 22. FIG. 23. \ FIG. 24. In order to obtain a still clearer understanding of this phenomena, let us consider the four characteristic positions: In Figs. 20-23, let a b be the primary winding, and c the secondary, which rotates synchronously. The field caused by the current 7, will then be as shown in Fig 24. THE INDUCTION MOTOR. 41 In the positions 1 and 3, the maximum value of the current acts once in one direction and once in the other. Since, however, the rotor has meanwhile turned through 180, its field will have in the positions 1 and 3 the same direction, and will have a characteristic shown by the dotted line. The above described action of the rotor now appears, and prevents the field from FIG. 25. being strongly pulsating, the pulsations being smoothed out. Therefore, we obtain a constant field rotating with the rotor. It is now possible to picture the action of the rotor as follows: Let 7 t be the magnetizing ampere turns of the exciting member, / 2 those of the rotor; then these two obviously must combine to form the ampere turns 42 THE INDUCTION MOTOR. . 1 1 which produce the constant field. This is true, if, for the moment, we neglect the leakage. If we assume again that the alternating current is a sine function, and that 7, is the maximum value of this current, the motor being unloaded, then the instan- taneous value of the ampere turns of the exciting member at no load is proportional to /! oc / t sin a If we consider the short-circuited secondary to be stationary, and the exciting winding to rotate, then the constant field must also be stationary, This field is produced by the ampere turns of the rotating exciting member, and these ampere turns vary according to a sine law. Therefore, the field of the short-circuited secondary must have a component proportional to T . 7-2 7 1 ~~ 2 cos a /jSinaoc T^sm 2 a: oc 7 t - - - The field of the short-circuited secondary must, however, be constant, and therefore the resulting ampere turns must be proportional to /, where / is the magnetizing current. The difference between the mag- netizing ampere turns and those active in the exciting member must, therefore, be produced in the short-cir- cuited secondary. Thus, if / 2 is the value of the current in the secondary we have / 2 = 7- (1 -cos 2 a) - *-k 4 ~ cos 2 a THE INDUCTION MOTOR. 3 The currents in the secondary can only be periodic functions of the time, that is, there can be no constant terms. Thus, we have, 7 2 ~ cos 2 a Therefore, the ampere turns of the primary member are A T l oc - i cos 2 a and those of the secondary are A T 2 oc ~ cos 2 a, and the magnetizing ampere turns These equations indicate that in the single-phase motor the magnetizing current / is half of the no load current. The four characteristic positions are now represented in Fig. 26. The sum of the two fields gives a straight line corre- sponding to the amplitude ~. 44 THE INDUCTION MOTOR. The single fields are represented by the full and dotted waves. The rotating field is not quite con- stant, but is slightly pulsating. It is obvious, how- ever, that this may be neglected. Another approximation previously made will now be corrected. Owing to the presence of leakage, the ratio No load current is not exactlv two. Magnetizing current In the position of Figs. 27 and 28 the secondary fields are the same. In Fig. 27 it is induced by the > sin a oc 3i sin 2 ar I (Z-cos 5 primary winding by the magnetizing current I = I ^ 7 2 , or, introducing the reluctance of the secondary In the other positions (Fig. 28), the secondary field is produced by the ampere turns of the short-circuited secondary. The reluctance will be smaller, since the field now has two paths, the main path and the leakage path. If we call the reluctance in this case p f then THE INDUCTION MOTOR. 45 FIG. 28. 46 THE INDUCTION MOTOR. We have seen that the secondary field remains almost constant, and therefore we have = , or, since P P -j,y No load current Magnetizing current By substitution of the simple reluctances p^ p s and p 2 the ratio can appear in a somewhat different form, in which only known values appear. It will be seen then that p' is little different from p and that the ratio is almost two. The phenomena in single-phase motors are thus as follows: In the unloaded single-phase motor, there is formed in the short-circuited secondary, as in the polyphase motor, a field which rotates with the short-circuited secondary. This field when it coincides with the axis of the primary winding is produced by the latter. At right angles to this position, it is produced by the no load currents of the short-circuited secondary. The latter are wattless and are produced by the primary member. Therefore, the no load current equals twice the magnetizing current, or, more accurately, the no load current is - times the magnetizing current. THE INDUCTION MOTOR. 47 Obviously, it is the same as far as the primary winding is concerned, whether the field in the position at right angles to the primary winding is produced by current in the short-circuited secondary, or by current in the winding of a second-phase, as in a two-phase motor. Therefore, the single phase primary acts with the same torque on a short-circuited secondary as that of one-phase of a two-phase motor. From these reflec- tions, we are able to obtain the diagram for the single- phase motor from that of the polyphase. In the polyphase motor we have A C oc / = magnetizing current. In the single phase motor we have A C = / or since p is little different from p' AC = 21 The ratio- ^ is therefore no longer -r p = , as /L u A \s p in the polyphase motor, but A_D = ^ A C ~ 2/> This ratio is equal to that of a polyphase motor having double the reluctance. One must, however, not carry the analogy too far. For instance, we must not expect to obtain a good single-phase motor by running a polyphase motor on a single-phase circuit by simply not using the second-phase. Such a motor would give bad results, and, on account 48 THE INDUCTION MOTOR. of the omission of the second phase, the output would not much exceed one-half the output of the polyphase motor of the same dimensions. In a properly designed single-phase motor, however, the relatively poor per- formance is not so marked. There are certain consider- ations in the design of the single-phase motor which materially reduce various dimensions; consequently a good single-phase motor is little larger than a polyphase motor of equal output, and its efficiency is not much lower. These matters of design, however, are beyond the scope of this publication, and I reserve the discussion of them for some future time. The main object in the preceding pages has been to reduce to practice my diagram, and to present it in a clear and easily understood form. If I have succeeded in making clearer a complicated part of our alternating current theory, the purpose of this work is fulfilled. UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LIBRARY BERKELEY Return to desk from which borrowed. This book is DUE on the last date stamped below. ENGINEERING LIBRARY MAY 2 2 1950 MAR 2 9 1951 LD 21-100m-9/48(B399sl6)476 YC 33497 838991 H4 THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LIBRARY