% i^\ ^A^*^ r |V ^ 0* (i .6 THE LIBRARY OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA PRESENTED BY PROF. CHARLES A. KOFOID AND MRS. PRUDENCE W. KOFOID HISTORY OF THE SPECULATIVE SOCIETY. # HISTORY OF THE SPECULATIVE SOCIETY OF EDINBURGH FROM ITS INSTITUTION IN M.DCC.LX1V. EDINBURGH: PRINTED FOR THE SOCIETY. M.DCCC.XLV. NOTICE. IHE opening pages of the following History explain the original design of the work, and the manner in which it gradually expanded ; but the Members of Committee to whom the preparation of the volume was entrusted, cannot permit it to pass from their hands without a few additional explanations. The work was commenced by them in the belief that it would form the occupation of a few weeks, or per- haps months ; but it has engaged a large share of their attention for upwards of three years. Had they fore- seen the extent and difficulty of their task, they would have shrunk from the labour, the sacrifice of time, and the responsibility which it involved ; but having under- taken it, they determined to spare no effort to render it complete ; and they have endeavoured also to lay it before the Society and the Subscribers at as early a period as was consistent with fulness and accuracy. The most difficult part of their duty was the pre- paration of the List of Members, which forms so large a portion of the volume. The materials with which the Editors commenced that division of the work ivi36e527 NOTICE. consisted solely of the names of entrants, extracted from the Minutes of the Society. In some cases, in- deed, where an individual afterwards eminent was known to have attended the Society in early life, there was little difficulty in appending an appropriate notice to his name ; but, in the great majority of cases, the Editors had a double difficulty to overcome. Having before them simply a list of names, they had first to discover the subsequent profession or pursuit of each member, and then, after the requisite clue had been obtained, to collect the details. It is not therefore surprising that their success has been only partial ; but it has been greater than at one period they could have anticipated ; and they can assure the Society that not one of the names to which no notice, or an imperfect one, is annexed, has been passed over with- out much careful investigation. It is, indeed, gene- rally in the case of strangers, whose stay in Edinburgh was short, or of Members who did not take a prominent share in the business of the Society, that they have failed in procuring full information. At the same time, as this volume may fall into the hands of some who are able to furnish the materials for filling up such blanks, the Editors take the liberty of requesting that any par- ticulars of this kind may be communicated, by letter, to the Secretary of the Society, to be made use of should NOTICE. another edition of the work be required at any future period. In the notices annexed to the names, accuracy in facts and dates has been strictly attended to ; and nothing has been admitted which was not found in authentic biographical works, or communicated to the* Editors by persons whose means of knowledge entitled them to perfect confidence. They are sensible, how- ever, that amidst so many details inaccuracies may have crept in, and they will feel obliged by these being pointed out to them. The Editors tender their very grateful thanks to all who have assisted them in their enquiries. The nature of their investigations required a correspondence — occa- sionally protracted to some length — with many persons to whom they were previously strangers ; and they cannot forget the courtesy with which — in almost every instance — their applications were met, or the anxious interest frequently expressed in the progress of the work. As this expression of interest often came from quarters where such sympathy had not been anticipat- ed, it proved no small encouragement to them in their labours. Where kindness was all but universal, it is impossible to enumerate every one of the correspond- ents to whom they have been indebted, and would be in- vidious to select only a few ; but they think it right to NOTICE. mention the names of those with whom they have been brought into closer intercourse, and from whom they have derived more frequent assistance. Much kind and judicious advice has been received from Lord CocKBURN, who has given his valuable aid not only in superintending the general plan and arrangement of the work, but also in minutely revising the more strictly historical part. In the collection of materials the Edi- tors have owed much to the ready and obliging assist- ance of David Laing, Esq., Librarian to the Society of Writers to the Signet, and of Mr. David Haig, As- sistant-Librarian to the Faculty of Advocates. But they desire especially to express their obligation to Mr. William Ferguson, Assistant-Librarian to the Society of Writers to the Signet, who, as Clerk of the Speculative Society, has been throughout their unwea- ried and efficient co-adjutor. They can truly say, that without his zealous aid in conducting many tedious researches, and his accuracy and perseverance in at- tending to the numerous details of the work, they could not have completed their task. The Editors cannot conclude without alluding to the loss which they sustained at an early stage of their un- dertaking, by the lamented death of their friend and fellow Member, Mr. William Macbean. If this work NOTICE. shall be thought to have any value, it would be unjust to his memory, as well as most ungrateful to their feelings, were not much of the merit attributed to him. It was owing to the zeal with which he em- braced the project, that the work on its present scale was undertaken ; and an earnest desire to see his fa- vourite design completed, has been their chief induce- ment to persevere in a task which the want of his companionship has deprived of its greatest charm. EDINBURGH, MDCCCXLV. 1 HISTORY OF THE SPECULATIVE SOCIETY OF EDINBURGH. rii 1 HE present work requires a little explanation ; perhaps an apology. It arose from the appointment, in February 1842, of a Committee of the Speculative Society for the purpose of printing a List of the Members. It was originally intended that this list should be nothing more than a mere catalogue of names and designations — an improvement upon one printed in 1820, which consisted of names only. The plan, however, was soon greatly extended. Even on a cursory survey, the roll was seen to be adorned with so many distinguished names, that it seemed worth while to make a minute examination into the future fortunes of the Members, and to record the result, in accurate notices of the professions which they followed, the oiBces which they filled, the works which they wrote, and the honours which they attained. And as the characters of some of the ablest and most excellent have been delineated by the pens of very accomplished authors with great power of discrimination, the insertion of such passages promised not only to serve the purpose of ornament, but to convey instructive lessons to youthful Members, at the outset of their career in the Society. It was next suggested, that to give the titles of the Essays which each Member had read, would aiFord an indication of his early tastes and pursuits, and a measure of his diligence. The date of his birth, com- A 2 HISTORY OF THE SPECULATIVE SOCIETY. pared with that of his admission, would indicate the age at which he entered the Society ; and the date of his death would be interesting if he rose to eminence, and if he did not, would in many cases shew, that an early fate only had prevented it. It was then anticipated that curiosity might be awakened to know something of the regulations under which the Society had been, and is now, carried on ; the periods at which it flourished, or seemed to decline ; its places of meeting ; its connexion with the University and its Patrons, and other similar details of its history. But it was urged on the Committee, that their undertaking would want its most interesting feature, if they neglected to print all the subjects of debate, with the names of those who opened the discussion, and the state of the vote on each. The subjects which had engaged the attention of the best educated youth of Scotland during the last eighty years would thus pass in review, and the fluctuation of opinion would be indicated by the varying result of the divisions. Questions, long agitated, would be seen assuming their place among moral or political truisms, as truth made its way, and prejudice lost ground ; while others, reappearing at intervals, in new forms and connexions, might be considered as likely to divide the opinions of mankind, so long as a diversity of feeling and judgment is a law of our nature. It was even said, too, that tlic historian and philosopher might be grateful for the addition which this volume would make to his store of information as to the progress of opinion and mental cultivation — the most important part of the recent history of Scotland. And this seemed the less improbable, when eminent men, who had been Members, were found speaking with so much earnestness and confidence of the good efiiect which the Society had had as a branch of their education ; and others, not Members, but therefore in some respects even better qualified to judge, were known to view such institutions as an important element in a system of College instruction. Such testimonies it was, therefore, thought right INTRODUCTION. o to collect into a separate chapter. And still the work was incomplete without a correct, although necessarily brief review of some similar institutions which existed before the Speculative, or arose after its establishment. Lists of the Office-bearers, and of those who were appointed in each Session to read the Introductory and Valedictory discourses, completed the task, which has far exceeded in extent and difficulty that which the Committee had proposed to themselves. They were led on, step by step, till the work swelled from its first humble shape to its present size ; and in this way the details of a juvenile Debating Club have been allowed to occupy a spa«e which some may be disposed to think disproportioned to the importance of the subject. The following Sections correspond to the subjects suggested to the Committee, as necessary for the completeness of the plan : — I. Historical Review of other Debating Societies. II. History of the Speculative Society. III. Its present Constitution and Laws. IV. Testimonies to the value of Debating Societies, and in par- ticular of the Speculative. V. The List of Members. VI. The Subjects of Debate. VII. Lists of Office-bearers, &c. I. HISTORICAL VIEW OP DEBATING SOCIETIES IN SCOTLAND. In the Universities of Scotland, the advantages of training the students to discuss controversially subjects connected with their studies, and to practise public speaking, were early appreciated. Even before the Reformation, it appears that in some of them, especially the College of St. Andrews, the youths were frequently employed in disputations and declamations, both privately in classes, and publicly before the University. After the Reformation, a discipline of this kind was enjoined by the statutes of all these Universities. But it must be remembered, that the exercises so prescribed were invariably conducted in presence of the Professors or Regents, and did not take place in voluntary and private associations of the students themselves. In describing the mode of teaching in the Theological Faculty at St. Andrews, immediately after the Reformation, Dr. M'Crie tells us, that during the intermission of the lectures from July to September, " the students were exercised once a-week in theological disputations, at which one of the Masters presided, and the rest were present, and took a share in the debate. The disputants were exhorted to avoid the altercation usually practised in the schools, and not to bite and devour one another like dogs ! but to behave as men desirous of mutual instruction, and as the servants of Christ, who ought not to strive, but to be gentle to all."* The same system seems to have been adopted • Life of Melville, vol. i. pp. 234, 235. ACCOUNT OF DEBATING SOCIETIES IN SCOTLAND. 5 in the other Universities; for, in describing the method of tuition pursued at Edinburgh, Principal Lee states, that " in the fourth Session, a great part of the time was occupied in the practice of disputation. The Regent prescribed the subject, and every candidate was matched with an antagonist, with whom it was necessary for him to carry on a debate in presence of his teacher."* The Government seems also at this time to have been anxious to promote a spirit of inquiry and emulation among the academic youth ; for in the liberal and enlightened plan of study recommended by Parliamentary Com- missioners in 1579, for the University of St. Andrews, and which was principally drawn up by Andrew Melville, then Principal of Glasgow College, it was proposed that the students of the class of rhetoric, then for the first time added to the course of philosophical study at this University, should spend part of every day in composition, and during the last half year, should declaim, or pronounce an oration, once every month, in Latin and Greek alternately. It was at the same time arranged that the students of theology " shall engage in public disputa- tions every week ; declamations once a month ; and at three periods during the course, a solemn examination shall take place, at which every learned man shall be free to dispute." t These recommendations and statutes were not sufiered to remain a dead letter J and their enforcement was followed by the natural good efiect. The anxious canvassing and sifting of opinions which were necessary before the Reformation could drive out the deeply-rooted errors of ages, tended to impart to the system of education pursued in our Universities an earnestness and vigour previously unknown. And among other con- curring causes which led to this result, may be mentioned, the indi- vidual exertions and influence of Andrew Melville, Principal, first of Glasgow College, and then of St. Mary's College at St. Andrews, and * Introduction to Edinburgh Academic Annual for 1840, p. "iQ. t Life of Melville, vol. i. pp. 241, 242. 6 HISTORY OF THE SPECULATIVE SOCIETY. of Robert RoUock, Principal of the newly founded University of Edinburgh. Possessed of learning and enlightened minds, they laboured to diffuse a spirit of activity among their students ; and their zeal and sagacity were crowned with success. The intellectual improvement of the young men was soon apparent in their academic eiforts, which rose far superior to what had been in comparison the mere schoolboy tasks of the preceding period. Some of them have been described as " elaborate specimens of learned productions."* And yet it was not so much in amount of classical acquirement as in increased vigour of mind, that the improvement and renewed energy of our system of education shewed itself. The ardour of the youth outstepped the confines which the statutes and regulations had pointed out. In the University of St. Andrews in particular, there was formed about this time a voluntary association of students, the members of which used to assemble, like the Peripatetics of old, in the fields, and there discuss questions of literature and philosophy, beyond the presence and control, although probably not without the countenance, of their Professors. A curious manuscript volume of exercises, prepared by members of this Society, was discovered some years ago by Principal Lee, and was deposited by him in the University Library at St. Andrews. Referring to these exercises, the learned Principal writes thus, " Many of these juvenile essays are Latin poems and dissertations, exhibiting proofs of more than ordinary ability and taste. Several others are Greek orations of considerable length ; others are Greek poems of an hundred lines or more. Some of the writers rose to high eminence ; and among the rest, Thomas Young, afterwards the tutor of Milton." t It was about the time of Rollock, that it became customary, in graduating as Master of Arts at the University of Edinburgh, to * Principal Lee. + Introduction to Edinburgh Academic Annual for 1840, p. 30. ACCOUNT OF DEBATING SOCIETIES IN SCOTLAND. publish a philosophical thesis, which was submitted to public disputa- tion. The theses were originally prepared by the Regents of the University, the candidates being required merely to maintain the doctrines advanced in them. This custom was liable to many obvious objections ; but there can be little doubt that it tended to sharpen the faculties, and prepare the disputants for more successfully engaging in public controversial discussion. More recently, the inaugural disserta- tions were prepared, as well as defended, by the students ; and many of these, still extant, are remarkable for ingenuity and elegance. The practice, however, fell gradually into disuse ; and only a small number of these addresses bear a date later than the middle of last century. In course of time, the practice of declaiming and disputing in presence of a Professor, and of publicly defending an inaugural dissertation, was abandoned, and the statutes requiring it fell into desuetude. But it was succeeded, after an interval, by one much better calculated to promote originality of thought and independence of opinion — that of private meetings for discussion and debate. It is worthy of remark, that the first trace of these private associations was in connexion with specific objects of scientific research ; those which took a more daring flight into the regions of general speculation in philosophical and political topics, were of a later date. In the year 1720, a Society was founded in Edinburgh among the students of natural philosophy, for the cultivation of subjects falling under that branch of science. In a very few years, this Society amassed a valuable collection of books relating to physical science, which has long since been incorporated with the College Library. The Medical Society originated in 1734, and had the discussion of medical subjects for its principal aim; its earliest records are dated in 1737, when it first assumed a definite form. This admirable institution, which has contributed materially to the education of a greater number of eminent medical men than any other private institution in the empire, still exists in a state of the highest efliciency. It obtained a Royal Charter in 177t*, 8 HISTORY OF THE SPECULATIVE SOCIETY. and is possessed of a hall, a museum, and a singularly complete and valuable library of medical and scientific works. It musters from 50 to 1 00 members at its meetings, and visiters are admitted under proper regulations. Its earlier debates and experimental inquiries contributed greatly to the foundation of the Edinburgh Medical School, to which, for upwards of a century, it has proved a valuable auxiliary.* * Stimulated probably by the success of the Medical Society, there arose soon after various clubs among the students, both in Edinburgh and Glasgow, which were short-lived, because ill regulated. They attempted to combina conviviality with literary and philosophical discussion ; and therefore it is probably not without reason that Wodrow, the historian of the Church, condemns them. Soon after this, a Society arose in Edinburgh, which, though of short duration, was bright with distinguished names. In his life of Dr. Robertson, Dugald Stewart says, " Nor was his ambition limited to the attainment of the honours that reward the industry of the recluse student ; anxious to distinguish himself by the utility of his labours in that profession to which he had determined to devote his talents, and looking forward, it is probable, to the active share he was afterwards to take in the ecclesiastical policy of Scotland, he aspired to add to the art of classical composition the powers of a persuasive and commanding speaker. With this view, he united with some of his contemporaries, during the last years of his attendance at College,t in the formation of a Society, whose object was to cultivate the study of elocution, and to prepare themselves, by the habits of extemporary discussion and debate, for conducting the business of popular assemblies. Fortunately for Dr. Robertson, he had here associates to contend with worthy of * Farther details regarding this Institution are abstained from, because ample information is given in the able and elegant " History of the Medical Society," printed in 1820. t He was at College from 1733 to 1741. ACCOOiT OP DEBATIXa SOCIEHES Df SCOTLAXD. 9 himaelf ; among othesa, Dr. William MKHiie, an ingenious joong phjsidan, afterwards vdl known in London ; Mr. William Cl^;liom, afterwards ProfessiH' i British Orators — and a curious collection of pamphlets. These, with a few works on general litera- ture, amount to about 1300 volumes. The books are lent out on the nights of meeting ; and a member is allowed to have six volumes at once. In 1797, the following resolution was entered in the Minutes, " That members who engage in any literary pursuit, should be re- commended to present their works to the Library — an acquisition which will prove doubly acceptable to the Society, as a testimony of their regard, and as a pleasing memorial of their success in those pursuits to which this Institution may have originally contributed." In February 1844, it was again resolved, "That it is desirable that PRESENT CONSTITUTION AND LAWS. 57 the Society should possess a complete set of the works of its members, which now amount to a valuable body of literature ; and as there are very few of these at present in the Library, steps should be taken to procure them, and especially to obtain donations from the authors." In Edinburgh, where there are so many excellent public Libraries, it is of comparatively little consequence that a large collection of books should be attached to the Society ; but a good selection of such as are most allied to the subjects usually discussed, and of books of reference, cannot fail to prove very useful, and has been found to be so. It would be a very curious extension of the Library, if the suggestions in the above resolutions were complied with, and a complete series obtained of works written by members. It would be difficult to men- tion any branch of literature or science, on which some able and standard works would not be found embraced in such a series. The Entrance-money we have seen rise gradually from one shilling and sixpence to five guineas, which is its present amount. The annual subscription by ordinary members is fixed each year. It has usually been a guinea. The penalty for failure to read an essay, or open a debate, is also a guinea, which may be remitted, when the excuse offered is considered satisfactory. Regular attendance, too, is enforced by penalties. The Roll of Members is called over before the business commences — again before the debate begins — and a third time at the close of the meeting. For absence at the first roll, the fine is one shilling — at the second, the same — at the third, two shillings ; — that is, four shillings for absence during the whole evening. When these fines have been incurred, they may be appealed from at the next meeting, and remitted, if the Society think the excuse given is sufiicient. Absence from town, and illness, are almost the only excuses ever sustained. Till within twenty years, no retrospective excuse was allowed ; but it was considered necessary for a member who intended leaving town, or was indisposed, to intimate this to the Society, before or at its meeting. This practice — the formal and punctilious politeness 58 HISTORY OF THE SPECULATIVE SOCIETY. of which must have been very burdensome — has been discontinued. Until lately, if a member was absent, without intimated excuse, for two meetings consecutively, his fines were doubled on the second night ; if for three, he incurred ipso facto expulsion, as it was called — that is, his name might be struck off the Roll, on a formal motion by the Secretary. Not a few members terminated their connexion with the Society in this way. That prompt and vigorous course of pro- ceeding has not been re-enacted in the present code of Laws, drawn up in 1838. The fines are four shillings for each meeting, until either the member re-appears and pays them, or a motion for expulsion, after due intimation, is carried. The order and decorum of the meetings is maintained by the Presi- dent for the night, who has the power of fining — a power, however, very rarely called into exercise. The Society may censure, and on a motion intimated three weeks before, and carried by two -thirds of the meeting, expel. The strong measure of a vote of censure has been very seldom resorted to ; and there have been only two cases of expul- sion for actual delinquency — the last having occurred more than fifty years ago. All other expulsions have been mere consequences, by fixed rule, of failure to attend or perform duty, and imply no moral misconduct. The true and living discipline, is that which operates indirectly through the public opinion of the place. Sense, justice, and gentlemanlike feeling, prevail to an extent far more than sufficient to repress levity, and utterly to prevent insolence, or any attempt at grave impropriety. In practice, perfect freedom is combined with perfect decorum, and the Society goes on peaceably and naturally. A letter of resignation can be received at any time, provided that no debt is due to the Treasurer, or any approaching duty left unprovided for. Honorary membership is reserved as a high mark of respect, and rarely conferred. Extraordinary membership may be applied for by those who have attended regularly for three years, and punctually PRESENT CONSTITUTION AND LAWS. 59 performed the business allotted to them ; and the petition is decided on by ballot. Until about 1810, the Society was very strict in with- holding this privilege from all who had not given the full attendance, and performed their full share of work. Hence many eminent men, especially strangers who did not reside three years in this place, have never obtained it. And hence the great majority of the extraordinary members are Scotchmen, and very generally connected with Edinburgh. Thus between 1764 and 1800, out of 356 members, only 110 attained this distinction. The proportion has been greater since, partly because the number of Scotchmen is greater than formerly, and partly because since about 1810, there has been far less strictness in requiring the legal conditions to be performed. When the petition has been received, and is referred to the ballot, it is invariably granted. If it were refused, the candidatp must continue to perform compulsory duty for an indefinite period ; and therefore by this refusal, a resignation would ultimately be extorted from an obnoxious member. The extraordinary member retains the privileges of the Society without any of its burdens ; but he must of course perform, under the usual penalties, any duty which he may voluntarily undertake. For it must not be supposed, that the attainment of that rank always terminates his practical connexion with the Society. On the contrary, it often does not even diminish the zeal of those who attain it, but in- duces them to continue their share in the debates, and even in the more laborious task of essay writing. The Society has no defined or formal connexion with the Senatus Academicus. AVe have seen that the compliment was once paid to Principal Robertson, of admitting him as a visiter, in consequence of his friendly offices. The late Principal Baird waa himself an ordinary before being elected an honorary member. Dr. Lee, although not previously a member, was admitted to honorary membership on his succeeding Dr. Baird as Principal of the University. It is under- stood that the Professors have such right of control over a Society, 60 HISTORY OF THE SPECULATIVE SOCIETY. whose premises are locally situated within the College precincts, as would entitle them to make any inquiry personally as to the pro- ceedings ; but they are not ex officio members ; and the Society has no farther alliance with the University. A candidate for admission does not require to shew that he is, or has ever been a student of the University. The title by which the Society holds its Hall from the Town Council, as patrons of the University, has already been mentioned historically. It is occupied exclusively by the Society. Indications were given, when it first obtained a hall, of a wish that the Society should at some future time apply for a Royal Charter ; the chief reason for desiring it being, that it would enable them to make up a legal title to their property. In 1826, the subject was again adverted to, but the opinion was decidedly against making any such application. It is not easy to see what good would result from its being incorporated now. Permanence is better secured by the fame of the great names on its Roll, than it could be by any Charter ; and its property and rights are in little danger, while there are so many persons in high offices and honourable employments, who gratefully remember it, and would resent any attempt to treat it with harshness. IV. TESTIMONIES TO THE VALUE OF DEBATING SOCIETIES, AND IN PARTICULAR OP THE SPECULATIVE. Cicero seems to allude, in the following passage, and with approbation, to institutions in Rome resembling the modem debating Society — " Equidem probo ista, Crassus inquit, quae vos fa cere soletis, ut, causa aliqua posita consimili causaruni earum, quae in forum defe- runtur, dicatis quam maxime ad reritatem accommodate. Sed plerique in hoc vocem modo, neque earn scienter, et vires exercent suaSj et linguae celeritatem incitant, verborumque frequentia delectantur. In quo fallit eos, quod audierunt, dicendo homines, ut dicant, efficere solere. Vere enim etiam illud dicitur, perverse dicere homines per- verse dicendo facillime consequi. Quamobrem in istis ipsis exercita- tionibus etsi utile est, etiam subito saepe dicere, tamen illud utilius, sumpto spatio ad cogitandum, paratius atque accuratius dicere. Caput autem est, quod (ut vere dicam) mininie facimus, (est enim magni laboris, quem plerique fugimus) quam plurimum scribere. Stylus optimus, et praestantissitnus dicendi elector ac ma<)ister ; neque in- juria : nam si subitam et fortuitam orationem commentatio et cogi- tatio facile vincit ; hanc ipsam profecto assidua ac diligens scriptura superabit. Omnes enim sive artis sunt loci, sive ingenii cujusdam atque prudentiae qui modo insunt in ea re de qua scribimus anqui- rentibus nobis, omnique acie ingenii contemplantibus ostendunt se et occurrunt ; omnesque sententiae, verbaque omnia, quae sunt cujusque 62 HISTORY OF THE SPECULATIVE SOCIETY. generis maxime illustria sub aciimen stili subeant et succedant necesse est ; turn ipsa coUocatio conformatioque verborum perficitur in scri- bendo, non poetico, sed quodam oratorio numero et mode. Haec sunt, quae clamores et admirationes in bonis oratoribus efficiunt neque ea quisquam nisi diu multumque scriptitarit etiam si vehementissime se in his subitis dictionibus exercuerit, consequetur ; et qui a scribendi con- suetudine ad dicendum venit, banc affert facultatem, ut, etiam subito si dicat, tamen ilia, quae dicantur, similia scriptorum esse videantur ; atque etiam, si quando in dicendo scriptum attulerit aliquid, cum ab eo discesserit, reliqua similis oratio consequetur. Ut concitato navigio, cum remiges sustinuerunt, retinet tamen ipsa navis motum et cursum suum, intermisso impetu pulsuque remorum ; sic in oratione perpetua, cum scripta deficiunt, parem tamen obtinet oratio reliqua cursum, scriptorum similitudine et vi concitata." The following remarks of Dr. Welsh, in his Life of Dr. Thomas Brown, are apposite and sound : — " The young men attending Edin- burgh University have for many years been accustomed to form them- selves into Literary Associations, in which they may be stimulated to greater ardour in the prosecution of their studies, and have an oppor- tunity of improving themselves in the art of public speaking. This practice exists in many Universities, but it has been carried to a much greater extent in Edinburgh than elsewhere ; a circumstance which has been ascribed to that system of education already alluded to, which affords to the students but few opportunities of distinguishing them- selves in the presence of their teachers, while it leaves them the greatest latitude in the conduct of their studies, and the disposal of their time. The number of these Associations, and the spirit with which they are in general supported, form an interesting feature in the habits of our students, and ought to be more regarded in the estimates formed of a Scottish education. That they are liable to abuse, leading in many instances to habits of desultory study, and giving a taste for dialectic subtleties, rather than for cautious induction, is not to be TESTIMONIES TO THE VALUE OF DEBATING SOCIETIES. 63 denied. But in general their effect is different, and when under proper regulations, they are certainly attended with very great advan- tages. The talents of the student are called forth in voluntary exer- tion — he becomes acquainted with the measure of his own powers — learns to depend upon his own efforts — and above all, is inspired with a spirit of free inquiry. Some of the greatest men of whom Scotland can boast, have acknowledged their obligations to such institutions ; and indeed there are perhaps few who have received their education in Edinburgh, who do not look back to the hours spent in these literary and philosophical Societies as among the most improving of their early life, and who do not feel themselves able to perform their part in the great drama of life with greater ease and success, in consequence of this early rehearsal." The late William Taylor of Norwich, at a meeting of the Norwich Philosophical Society, in paying a tribute to the memory of Dr. Reeve, who had been, while in Edinburgh in early life, a member of the Speculative Society, said, " There is no one academic institution which better deserves a general imitation than those debating Societies of Edinburgh. With only so much of police as is requisite for the pre- servation of order, the young men assemble by themselves, free from the repressive overawing influence of age, or office, or established reputation. On a subject, announced long enough beforehand to admit of some preparatory reading, the several members engage with one another in a competitory debate. The struggle is between those of the same age— the rivalry between natural equals ; praise and blame are bestowed with all the warmth and frankness of youth. At the close of the discussion, each is found to have carried some peculiar contribution to that stock of information which henceforth becomes common to them all ; and each has obtained some additional facility at expressing his thoughts aloud, with order, clearness, and propriety. On everyday conversation, they bestow grace of diction, command of topic, and afiluence of matter. On solemn occasions, they lift the 64 HISTORY OP THE SPECULATIVE SOCIETY. citizen into a sort of national consequence. Without use of public speaking, hardly any prayer to Government can be efficaciously for- warded — hardly any institution of benevolence popularly founded and preserved. Excellence in writing may be attained in solitude or under restraint ; but excellence in speaking seldom results, unless from the early habit of addressing those whose sympathies are quick, and whose sincerity is loud. Eloquence is the nursling of society — the daughter of freedom, never of caution." From the writings of members of the Speculative themselves, many similar testimonies may be selected. In the autobiography of Sir Walter Scott, the following passage occurs, in which, although not mentioned by name, the Speculative Society, along with others, is referred to, " It is well known, that in Edinburgh one great spur to emulation among youthful students, is in those Associations called Literary Societies, fonned not only for the purpose of debate, but of composition. These undoubtedly have some disadvantages where a bold, petulant, and disputatious temper happens to be combined with considerable information and talent. Still, however, in order to such a person being actually spoiled by his mixing in such debates, his talents must be of a very rare nature, or his effrontery must be proof to every species of assault ; for there is generally in a well selected Society of this nature, talent sufficient to meet the forwardest, and satire enough to penetrate the most undaunted. I am particularly obliged to this sort of Club for introducing me, about my seventeenth year, into the Society which at one time I had entirely dropped ; for, from the time of my illness at College, I had little or no intercourse with any of my class companions, one or two only excepted. Now, however, about 1788, I began to feel and take my ground in society. A ready wit, a good deal of enthusiasm, and a perception that soon ripened into tact and observation of character, rendered me an accept- able companion to many young men, whose acquisitions in philosophy and science were far superior to any thing that I could boast." TESTIMONIES TO THE VALUE OF DEBATING SOCIETIES. 65 In an elegant address on the occasion of laying the foundation stone of the Hall of the Medical Society of Edinburgh, Sir Gilbert Blane, who was one of the Presidents at the time (1775), and was also a member of the Speculative, thus happily delineates the benefits to be derived from social studies. " Our predecessors perceived that it was not merely the frigid plodding on books, nor the doctrines and precepts of age and authority, nor the little detail of an empirical practice which could inspire that taste and spirit, and give that manly turn to our in- quiries which alone can render study agreeable, vigorous, and success- ful. They perceived that it was in society alone, by the mutual com- munication and reflection of the lights of reason and knowledge, that the intellectual, as well as the moral powers of man, are ex- alted and perfected. I will venture to appeal to every one's expe- rience, if, in the glow of social debate, he is not conscious of a vigor- ous exertion of mind, of an energy of thought unknown in the solitary hour." Sir James Mackintosh thus expresses himself in regard to the pre- paratory exercises of an orator, and the advantages accruing to him from debating societies. " Eloquence differs in one very remarkable respect from the other fine arts. The poet may execute a thousand rude sketches in the soli- tude of his study ; he may commit them to the flames, and he needs not appear before the public till he has attained the perfection of his art. His friends may boast, ' Nee licuit populis parvum te Nile \idere.' But it is otherwise with the orator. He must expose his first rude exercises to the malignant curiosity of the public. It is only by prac- tice before them that he can learn his art. Whatever his genius may be, it has a mechanical part, which every man but Pitt has acquired by use ; and this is the very part of which nine-tenths of his hearers can best judge. He is like the general who learns to fight by fighting, I 66 HISTORY OF THE SPECULATIVE SOCIETY. and whose only school is real war. This is a reason for indulgence towards the first attempts of the speaker, which applies neither to those of the poet nor of the painter. As far as I have observed, a man must be an every day speaker to become popular. It has the air of business. The eloquent speeches or passages of such a speaker, seem to rise natu- rally on great occasions from his usual level. On the contrary, occa- sional speakers are very apt to be thought rhetoricians and haranguers." He concludes in another place, that for such reasons " Debating Socie- ties are almost necessary aids in the mechanical parts of the art of public speaking." On this distinguished philosopher visiting Scotland in 1823, a Com- mittee of the Speculative Society waited on him to request his accept- ance of a diploma of honorary membership, and to express the Soci- ety's esteem and admiration for his character. Sir James made the following answer : — " Gentlemen, I feel most sensibly the honour you have now conferred upon me, and assure you that I look back upon the period spent in the Speculative Society, as having been most useful to me in the acquisition of any small advantages I may possess. I beg you will express to the Society my grateful acknowledgments for so flattering a mark of their kindness and regard. I thank you most particularly for an honour which is connected in my mind with the most agreeable associations." In the memoirs of Francis Horner, recently published, there are fre- quent allusions to the Speculative Society, in his Journals from 1797 to 1803. During the first three years of that period, he was so regular in his attendance that he was absent from only three meetings. In his journal of 20th November 1802, when he had been upwards of two years at the Bar, he thus writes in arranging his studies for the winter. " I wish to attend the Speculative Society very regularly, because I am satisfied that I have already derived great benefit from the exertions of that place; and still entertain hopes of receiving farther improve- TESTIMONIES TO THE VALUE OP DEBATING SOCIETIES. 67 luent. In general, I shall leave myself as I have hitherto always done, to the extemporaneous efforts of the evening; but it would be very advantageous to prepare myself upon one or two of the best questions ; this, I observe, is the plan which Brougham follows." At a dinner on the 70th anniversary of the Society in January 1 835, Lord Jeffrey, who was in the chair, in proposing the toast, " Prosperity to the Speculative Society," paid the following beautiful tribute to its value as an institution. " lie might be permitted to say, that all his ob- servation and all his reflection had tended to enhance in his estimation the value of the advantages of such an Institution, and to diminish his fear of any danger or hazards which it might be supposed to produce. The advantages were obvious — they would all acknowledge its effects on education — in training men at an early period of life to vigorous exer- tion, and to the use of their minds — in encouraging the diffident by accustoming them to try their hidden strength, and exercise their slug- gish faculties comparatively in private, among their co-evals and friends — and also in checking the forwardness of the more presumptuous in the generous conflict with equal or superior minds. * * * They were aware how natural it was in the early aspirations after philosophical pursuits, for young and ardent minds to run into error, but he verily believed it was the safest and best course for its ultimate eradication, to let such minds fairly exhaust themselves at an early period of life. Thus the mind was enabled to extinguish the glitter of paradoxes by the application of principles early engendered — -was armed against the deceptive influences of scepticism and error — and accustomed to look back on them as among its early puerilities, which, in its yet untried youth it had combated and overthrown. Such he conceived were the chief advantages of the Speculative Society in a moral and intellec- tual point of view — that it not only tended to enlarge and extend the charities of intellectual life, but in reality it encouraged and enabled its members to form a juster estimate both of themselves and of other men. And though last, certainly not among the least of its advan- 68 HISTORY OP THE SPECULATIVE SOCIETY. tages, he was inclined to place the actual enjoyment and ennobling gra- tification which it produced. For his own part, in looking back to that period of his life when he had experience of this Society, he could hardly conceive any thing in after life more to be envied, than the recollection of that first burst of intellect — when free from scholastic restraint, and throwing off the thraldom of a somewhat servile docility, the mind first aspired to reason and question nature for itself — and, half wondering at its own temerity, first ventured without a guide into the mazes of speculation, or tried its unaided flight into the regions of intellectual adventure, to revel uncontrolled through the bright and boundless realms of literature and science. True it was, that all those hopes were not realized, that those proud anticipations were often destined to be humbled — but still could it be doubted that they were blessings while they lasted, or that they tended to multiply the chances of their being one day realized ? He was afraid he was detaining them, but he could not avoid stating what had been long so familiar to his own mind respecting institutions of this kind, which he considered, under proper guidance, calculated to develop the seeds of generous emulation, to lay the foundation and trace the outlines of that permanent and glorious triumph to be achieved in after life." Lord Murray, in proposing the health of the English, Irish, and foreign members on the same occasion, said, " That Benjamin Constant, ooe of the most distinguished authors in Europe, never referred to the Speculative Society without acknowledging that in it he had received more information than he had done in any other place." In acknowledging a vote of thanks for his exertions in the dis- agreement with the Town Council, Lord Cockburn thus writes, 28th February 18'1'2, — " I am conscious that I owe every thing I have to the Speculative Society ; and every ordinary member, who makes a right use of it, may be assured that he will be hereafter enabled to make the same declaration truly." But perhaps the highest tributes to the Society have been paid in TESTIMONIES TO THE VALUE OF DEBATING SOCIETIES. fJ9 the course of the correspondence for materials undertaken by the Committee for preparing this work, in the numberless assurances which they have received from distant and long separated members, of their gratefid recollection of the useful and pleasant hours they spent within its walls. V. LIST OF MEMBEES. 1. WILLIAM CREECH. J Original Membeti. [ Honorary, March 29, 1769. Afterwards Bookseller. Lord Provost of Edinburgh in 1811 and 1812, and Fellow of the Royal Society of Edinburgh. For forty-four years Mr. Creech was the most extensive pub- lisher in Scotland, and was himself the author of numerous contributions to several periodical works which were after- wards published under the title of Edinburgh Fugitive Pieces. Born, 1745. Died, 1815. " Oh Willie was a witty wight. And had o' things an unco slight ; Auld Reekie aye he keepit tight, An trig, an braw." Burns. EssAY.s. — The advantages of Society in general, and of Literary Institutions in particular. (Intro- ductory.) The Immortality of the Soul. The Attributes and the Providence of God. Instability of Conduct. The Principles of belief. 2. ALLAN MACONOCHIE. i Original Mkmbf.r. J Honorary, March 28, 1770. (. Resigned, April 16, 1799. Afterwards of Meadowbank, Mid-Lothian, called to the Scottish Bar in 1770. In 1769 he entered at Lincoln's Inn, for the LIST OF MEMBERS. 71 purpose of studying under Lord Mansfield. In 1779, he was appointed Professor of the Law of Nature and Nations, in the University of Edinburgh, and in 1788, Sheriflf of Ren- frewshire, and was raised to the Bench by the title of Lord Meadowbank, in 1796. In 1804, his Lordship was ap- pointed one of the Lords Commissioners of Justiciary, and in 181.5, one of the Lords Commissioners of the Jury Court. Lord Meadowbank was one of the earliest members of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, and a Director of the Astrono- mical Institution. As a Judge, his opinions were received with the highest respect. The last Essay read by him to the Society, was in 1 773. Born, 1748. Died, 1816. " Above all, we have what is with me of the highest authority and of the greatest weight — the very valuable opinion of the late Lord Meadowbank — one of the best lawyers, one of the most acute men — a man of large general capacity, and of great experience, and with very few exceptions, if any, the most diligent Judge we can remember in the practice of Scotch Law." Loud Brougham. Essays. — The Improvement of the Understanding. Adversity. Benevolence. The Sublime. Novelty. (Valedictory.) Harmony. The Laws, Nature, and Influence of Melody. Eloquence. The Moral Agency of Man. HISTORY OF THE SPECULATIVE SOCIETY. In Support of the Certainty of the Principles of Belief. The Influence of Modern Manners ^on Charac- ter and Happiness. Excellency of Character. (Valedictory.) ALEXANDER BELSCHES. j Owginal Membkb. ( Honorary, April 7, 1772. Afterwards of Invermay. Called to the Scottish Bar in 17C8. His last Essay was read to the Society in 1771. Born, . Died, 1779. Essays. — The Advantages of History. The Love of Fame. Sobriety. Conversation. The proper Improvement of Social and Literary Institutions. (Valedictory.) History of the Origin, Rise, Progress, and pre- sent State of the Society. (Introductory.) The Absurdity of Scepticism. The Origin and Progress of Criminal Law. 4. JOHN BRUCE. [ Original Member. I Honorary, February 21, 1770. Afterwards Professor of Logic in the University of Edinburgh. He was one of the two joint Patentees in the Office of King's Printer for Scotland, and was Historiographer to the East India Company. His last Essay was read to the Society in 1771. He was present at the Jubilee Dinner in 1814, and attended an Ordinary Meeting of the Society in 1819, fifty- four years after its Institution. Born, 1744. Died, 1826. LIST OF MEMBERS. 73 Essays. — Friendship. Government of the Passions. The Extent and Limits of Human Reason, the Errors it was subjected to, and the Remedies thereof. (Introductory.) Human Nature. The various Characters of Mankind. The Discovery of Truth and Detection of Fallacy. The Nature and Tendency of Political Laws. Imagination and Memory. Delicacy. The Spirit and Effects of Philosophy. The Natural History of the Imagination. The Mythology of the Ancients. 5. JOHN BONAR. j Ohiginal Member. ( Honorary, February 4, 1772. Afteiwards Solicitor of Excise. The late Lord Melville had a high opinion of his abilities, and placed great confidence in his judgment in important questions of Revenue. He was author of a pamphlet on the Establishment of a Licensed Theatre in Edinburgh, and other works. He was Secretary of the Society from its Institution till November 1771. On 8 th February 1771, he received an unanimous vote of thanks for his zeal and attention to the interests of the Society. His last Essay was read to the Society in 1775, indicating an attendance of more than eleven years. Born, 1747. Died, 1807. Essays. — Language in general, and, in particular, the English Tongue. Conversation. Part I. Advantages of Societies for Improvement, and 7* HISTORY OF THE SPECULATIVE SOCIETY. the means of supporting siicli Institutions. (Valedictory.) Conversation. Part II. The Pleasures of Virtue and Solitude. Importance of Virtue to the Happiness of Ho- ciety. Origin of Language. Conversation. Part III. Causes of the Decline of Eloquence in Modern, from what it was in Ancient Times. Progress and Decay of the Fine Arts in Greece and Home. Oracles. Rise, Progress, and present State of the Com- mercial Glory of Great Britain. Language, with Remarks on a late Essay on it.s Origin and Progress. Origin and Effects of Money. 6. JOHN MACKENZIE. f Original Member. ( EXTBAORDINAKY, Nov. 26, 1771. Afterwards of Dolphinton. Called to the Scottish Bar in 1 77 1 , and appointed a Judge of the Commissary Court in 177C. Born, 1748. Died, 1788. Ess A Ys. — Fortitude. Virtue. Benevolence. The Nature and Faculties of Brutes. What is important in the Nature of Man, exter- nal situation or personal qualities ? LIST OF MEMBERS. 76 7. CHARLES STUART. f Admitted, November 23, 1764. ( Honorary, November 24, 1772. Afterwards Minister of Cramond, which charge he resigned from conscientious scruples. He subsequently practised Me- dicine in Edinburgh, having taken his Degree at that Uni- versity in 1795. He afterwards succeeded to the Estate of Dunearn. Born, 1745. Died, 1828. Essays. — The motives of Human Actions. Solitude. Reflection. (Introductory.) The nature of Virtue. Civil Establishments of Religion. The Doubts concerning the Proofs from the Di- vine Attributes of the Soul's Immortality. The ultimate end of Human Actions, (Intro- ductory.) 8. THOMAS CAW. ( admitted, November 23, 1764. \ Honorary, May 3, 1769. A native of South Carolina. He took the degree of Doctor of Medicine at the University of Edinburgh, in 1769. Bom, . Died, 1772. Essays. — Improvement of Time. Improvement and Enlargement of the Mind. Use and Government of the Passions. Choice of Company. Sensation and Sympathy. Advantages of Society and their Improvement. (Introductory.) The Power of Habit. The Art of being agreeable in Company. 76 HISTORY OF THE SPECULATIVE SOCIETY. 9. JOHN GILCHRIST. J Admitted, November 23, 1764. ( Resigned, January 3, 1766. Afterwards took the Degree of Doctor of Medicine, and prac- tised at Dumfries. He founded and long superintended the Dumfries and Galloway Infirmary. Bom, 1747. Died, 1830. Essays. — The ultimate End of Learning. Advantages of the early Acquisition of Know- ledge. 10. GEORGE MUAT. j Admitted, December 14, 1764. ( Expelled, December 3, 1766. Essay. — Advantages of Commerce. 11. ANDREW PLUMMER. ( Admitted, December '.'1, 1764. \ Extraordinary, December 22, 1772. Afterwards of Sunderland Hall. Called to the Scottish Bar in 1771. Appointed Convener and Sheriff of Selkirkshire in 1785, which Office he held till his death. He was an Anti- quary, fond of Mechanics and Heraldry, and collected a very extensive, valuable, and curious Library. Bom, 1748. Died, 1799. Essays. — Advantages of Society. The Selfish Passions. Honesty. The Constituents of Character. Expressions of the Constituents of Character. 12. WILLIAM TOUCH. r Admitted, December 28, 1764. ( Non-Resident, March 8, 1765. Afterwards employed in one of the Government Offices at Madras. He subsequently entered the Navy, and was Pur- LIST OF MEMBERS. 77 ser of His Majesty's Ship Tlieseus at tlie time of liis Death. Born, 1747. Died, ISOO. Essay. — Reflection. 13. WILLIAM TORRENCE. f Admitted, February 8, 1765. I Dropt from the Roll, Nov. 9, 1768. Afterwards Minister of the Parish of Glencroes, in Mid- Lothian, to which charge he was ordained in 1788. He continued to discharge the duties of his office for nearly fifty years in an exemplary manner, and was also distinguished for his classi- cal acquirements. Bom, 1746. Died, 1836. Essays. — Poetry. Taste. Virtue. 14. JOHN M'MUTRIE. j Admitted, February 8, 1765. ( Extraordinary, December 14, 1772. Afterwards Minister of Kilmarnock. He is one of the Clergy- men alluded to in Burns' well-known poem, entitle