BRITISH REPTILES. C.C.HOPLEY ONE SHILLING BRITISH NEWTS. [Frontispiece. goung Collector BRITISH REPTILES BATRACHIANS. CATHERINE C. HOPLEjY, Author of " Curiosities and Wonders of Serpent Life," " Aunt Jenny 's American Pets" etc., etc. LONDON : SWAN SONNENSCHEIN, LOWREY, & CO., PATERNOSTER SQUARE. 1888. SiOLOGt LIBRARY Uniform with this Volume. Price Is. each (post free, 1s. 2d.). 1. BUTTERFLIES, MOTHS, AND BEETLES. By W. F. KIRBY. 2. CRUSTACEANS AND SPIDERS. By F. A. A. SKUSE. 3. FUNGI, LICHENS, ETC. By PETER GRAY. 4. MOSSES. By JAMES E. BAGNALL. 5. POND-LIFE. By E. A. BUTLER. 6. SEAWEEDS, SHELLS, AND FOSSILS. By PETER GRAY and B. B. WOODWARD. 7. ANTS, BEES, WASPS, AND DRAGON- FLIES. By W. HARCOURT-BATH. 8. SILKWORMS. By E. A. BUTLER. 9. BRITISH BIRDS. By R. BOWDLER SHARP and W. HARCOURT-BATH< 10. REPTILES AND BATRACHIANS. By CATHERINE C. HOPLEY. 11. LAND AND FRESH WATER SHELLS. By Dr. W. WILLIAMS. {Shortly. 12. FISHES. By F. A. A. SKUSE. [Shortly. 13. MAMMALIA. By F. A. A. SKUSE. [Shortly. Extra Series. 14. COINS AND TOKENS (English). By L. JEWITT. LONDON : SWAN SONNENSCHEIN, LOWREY, & Co. CONTENTS. INTRODUCTION CHAPTER I. REPTILES GENERALLY CHAPTER II. THE OPHIDIA . 2I CHAPTER III. THE VIPER 29 CHAPTER IV. THE RING SNAKE 34 CHAPTER V. THE SMOOTH SNAKE, . . 3 CHAPTER VI. THE AMPHIBIANS 4 1 454817 CONTENTS. PAGE CHAPTER VII. THE COMMON FROG . . 43 CHAPTER VIII. THE EDIBLE FROG 58 CHAPTER IX. THE COMMON TOAD 6 1 CHAPTER X. THE NATTER-JACK CHAPTER XI. THE NEWTS \ 70 CHAPTER XII. THE SAURIANS gl CHAPTER XIII. ANGUIS FRAGILIS 85 CHAPTER XIV. THE LIZARDS . . . . . . . .89 INTRODUCTION. THIS little book differs in several notable particulars from most of those of the " Young Collector " series that have already appeared. First, the creatures herein described are living pets, the occupants of the Vivarium and not the Cabinet. Next they are few ; the intention of these volumes being to treat of British species only, and Britain has but few reptiles. Thirdly, though still comparatively small creatures, they belong to the important group of Vertebrata or back-boned animals. Those of our young collectors who have already possessed themselves of Kirby's, Butler's, Woodward's, and Skuse's contri- butions to this series, will have observed that the Insects, Shell- fish, and Crustaceans treated of are boneless ; and that, compared with the rest of the animal kingdom, all are very small creatures. It is worthy of note that out of the seven sub-kingdoms in which zoologists have generally arranged the inhabitants of the globe, six are composed entirely of these small, boneless creatures, while the one remaining sub-kingdom, animals with a bony skeleton, the Vertebrata^ embraces the largest and the most important groups, including man. Persons who have acquired the habit of observing nature those particularly who incline to the study of animated nature cannot fail to be impressed by its teeming life in myriad forms. Even in a city during the summer, birds and insects are abundant ; and we have only to place some pond weed in a glass bowl of water, and a world of life will soon inhabit it. Should our home be in rural districts, and our inclination lead us to study the denizens of trees, streams, or meadows, we' become fairly puzzled as to which class of beings to choose and where to begin. Within a square foot of soil on the bank where we rest we may, with an ordinary magnifier, see more living 8 INTRODUCTION. creatures ibar. v^e cr.n count. Let us stoop over a brook or a rain-pool on a warm, sunny day, and again we shall find it im- possible to calculate the number and variety of minute objects that in diverse movements are flitting, darting, swimming, in an independent existence. The more powerful our magnifying glass the more bewildering are the wondrous forms of microscopic creatures revealed to us. At the seaside, on the surface of the waves, and in the depths of the ocean, living forms are not less numerous. By this we can understand how it is that while our great naturalists have arranged all known animals under say seven grand divisions, six out of the seven embrace only small, boneless, and, to a great extent, microscopic beings. Included among the largest of these boneless creatures are our familiar acquaintances of the garden and the shore, worms, slugs, spiders, beetles, butterflies, all insects, in fact snails, centipedes, crabs, lobsters, star-fishes, jelly-fishes, sea anemones, and many others that will occur to the memory as being boneless and blood- less. By " bloodless," not having red blood is to be understood ; and as it happens that all animals with a bony frame possess red blood, Aristotle divided the animal kingdom into two great groups, " those with blood and those without blood." But the fluid circulating through the bodies of insects, worms, shell-fish, etc., though nearly colourless, answers to the blood of quadrupeds, and is so spoken of by physiologists ; therefore we may dismiss any reference to the fluids of the body, and retain the distinction of bones and no bones correctly speaking, Verte- brate and Invertebrate animals as the most explicit and com- prehensive mode of separating the two great groups. All animals with a bony skeleton, whether seal, fish, frog, or elephant, being formed on a similar plan, of which the solid structure, the back- bone, is the chief support ; and this backbone being composed of a number of small bones vertebra (see skeletons, pp. 26, 82) compactly jointed together, the term Vertebrate has been chosen to designate them. Excepting serpents and some of their allies ver- tebrate animals have four limbs, but never more than four. In the seal these four limbs are paddles ; in the fish they are its two pairs of principal fins, the pectoral and ventral fins ; in the bird the two fore limbs become wings ; in ourselves arms ; in the frog and the elephant they are four legs. We are apt to speak of four-footed animals as " quadrupeds," in distinction to bipeds, but while frogs, newts, and lizards have each four legs we do not associate them with quadrupeds ; though Aristotle did call them " Oviparous, or egg- laying quadrupeds." The great Cuvier divided the egg-producing animals into birds, insects, and reptiles ; the latter including INTRODUCTION. 9 serpents, lizards, turtles, crocodiles, and frogs; and, like Aristotle, he called the four latter "oviparous quadrupeds." Linnaeus called all reptiles " Amphibious animals," but the study of the frog family, and the fact that they begin life like a fish, breathing through gills, has caused them to be separated from the class Reptilia and formed into a distinct class, the Batrachia, from ySara^os, a frog. They include a great many species in different parts of the world, while those at home are confined to frogs, toads, and their relatives the newts. Batrachians are true Amphibians, living alter- nately both in water and on land. It is quite worth the attention of students to compare the progressive systems of some of our best-known naturalists. A general comprehension of the animal kingdom may be thus obtained; and a knowledge of the terms most frequently employed will be of use in whichever branch he desires to study. Aristotle divided living beings into eight groups ; viz. THOSE WITH BLOOD. i. Viviparous four-footed animals; 2. Birds; 3. Oviparous four-footed animals ; 4. Fishes. THOSE WITHOUT BLOOD. 5. Soft animals (Cephalopods, etc.) ; 6. Soft animals with shells (Mollusca) ; 7. Insects ; 8. Shelled animals (echini, snails, and mussels, etc.). For a long while, in classifying "reptiles" and insects much confusion prevailed. The latter were "serpentes " because they creep ; while the former were sometimes called " insects," because they lay eggs. It is not uncommon even now for the uneducated to speak of small reptiles as " insects." Regarding classification Cuvier wrote u It will be found that there exist four principal forms, four general plans on which all animals seem to have been modelled ; " viz. i. Animalia vertebrata ; 2. Animalia mollusca ; 3. Animalia articulata ; 4. Animalia radiata. The last named is designated by Owen " a chaotic group," and by Huxley a " radiate mob ;" but even now, as the microscope reveals fresh organisms and unsuspected relationships, zoologists- differ in the arrangement of these sub-kingdoms. It must not be thought, therefore, that in criticising the classifications of those great men who may be termed the Fathers of Zoology, any slur is cast upon their work. In the labour of their lives they achieved results which have been starting-points for their successors.. 10 INTRODUCTION. Biology, comparative anatomy, embryology, paleontology, che- mistry, and microscopy now help to throw light on the great work of Zoology. To one or other of these branches scientific men of the world are devoting themselves, and especially to the study of Cuvier's "Radiate mob," in which debate is still active and decision uncertain. In comparing the following tables, it will be seen that for the very lowest forms the name Protozoa (first animal) is generally -accepted. So, also, is Mollusca for shell-fish, the word having been retained ever since Aristotle, who thus distinguished the group. Darwin describes the Protozoa as " animals composed of gelatinous material, showing scarcely any traces of distinct organs." " Uni-cellular animals," Dallas calls them, " in which the functions of life are performed by its simplest element, the cell." They are mostly microscopic. The Protozoa are sometimes placed first, sometimes last in the arrangement of " Types," " Divisions," or " Groups,' 7 which words seem to be displacing the old-fashioned and somewhat unmeaning term " Kingdoms." The later and more intelligent arrangement is to begin with the lowest forms, the mere specks of protoplasm, and work upwards through the more complex organisms to the Vertebrata. Dallas, in The Natural History of the Animal Kingdom (1856), was, I believe, the first English naturalist who introduced this rational method. His divisions were then five, viz. 1. PROTOZOA. Composed of a simple cell, or an aggregation of cells. 2. RADIATA. With parts arranged round a common centre. 3. ARTICULATA. Including an immense diversity of forms, vermes, insecta, Crustacea, etc., etc. 4. MOLLUSCA. Shell-fish and cephalopods. 5. VERTEBRATA. Huxley, in his Classification of Animals (1869), wrote: " It seems to me that the whole animal kingdom cannot be divided into fewer than eight primary groups, no two of which are sus- ceptible, in the present state of knowledge, of being defined by characters which shall be at once common and diagnostic." He arranges them thus, VERTEBRATA. MOLLUSCA. ANNULOS.E. MOLLUSCOID^:. ANNULOID^E. COZLENTERATA. INFUSORIA. PROTOZOA. INTRODUCTION. 1 1 Mivart, in his introductory pages to The Common Frog, (1874), gives seven great groups, " each of which is characterised and defined by certain points of structure possessed by the animals which compose it, and which serve to distinguish them." 1. ANNULOSA. With bodies composed of a series of segments or rings, placed one behind the other, as in earth-worms, centipedes, wood- lice, all insects, lobsters, crabs, scorpions, spiders, and leeches. 2. MOLLUSCA. Snails, slugs, cuttle-fish, and shell-fish. 3. MOLLUSCOID^. Sea-squirts or Ascidians (sometimes called Tunicates), and lamp shells, together with minute aquatic animals in compound aggregations. 4. ANNULOID^E. Star-fishes, sea-urchins, together with internal parasites (tape-worms, etc.), and their allies. 5. CCELENTERATA. Sea anemones, jelly-fish, polypes, and the coral animals. 6. PROTOZOA. Sponges, the Infusoria, and all the lower forms of animal life. 7. VERTEBRATA. Dr. Henry Alleyne Nicholson, in his popular Manual of Zoology (1878), gives six types or plans of structure, technically known as " Sub-kingdoms," viz. i. PROTOZOA; 2. CCELENTERATA; 3. ANNULOID^:; 4. LOSA ; 5. MOLLUSCA ; 6. VERTEBRATA. ANNU- CasselFs Natural History (1881), edited by Prof. Martin Duncan, is also a popular work. His sub-divisions of the Inver- tebrata are six, differing somewhat from those given above, viz. i. MOLLUSCA; 2. ARTHROPODA; 3. VERMES ; 4. ECHINO- DERMATA; 5. ZOOPHYTA; 6. PROTOZOA; with two intermediate groups, MOLLUSCOID.E and TUNICATA. There has lately (1884) been translated into English an important work, The Text-Book of Zoology^ by C. Glaus, of the University of Vienna. He says : " In the present state of science we consider it convenient to distinguish nine types as the chief divisions, and to characterise them as follows, 1. PROTOZOA. Minute, and without cellular organs. 2. CCELENTERATA. Radiate animals segmented into 2, 4, or 6, with a central body cavity. 12 INTRODUCTION. 3. ECHINODERMATA. (Spiny skin) radiating in mostly 5 directions, with a calcareous dermal skeleton. 4. VERMES. Bilateral, without jointed appendages. 5. ARTHROPODA. Bilateral, with jointed appendages. 6. MOLLUSCOID/E. Bilateral, unsegmentecl animals, with tentacles or spirally rolled buccal arms. 7. MOLLUSCA. Bilateral, soft, unsegmentecl, without a skeleton for locomotion ; either bivalve or monovalve. 8. TUNICATA. Bilateral, unsegmented animals, with sac-shaped or barrel-shaped bodies. 9. VERTEBRATA. In the latest important work, The Standard Natural History (1885), in six large volumes, by the leading American biologists, all the great naturalists of the day have been compared and are quoted. In it are given nine Divisions or Branches, with a prospective tenth, the PROTISTA, those very primitive forms in which animal and vegetable life are so blended that it is scarcely possible to distinguish the one from the other. Branch I. PROTOZOA. ,, II. PORIFERATA. Sponges. ,, III. CCELENTERATA. Jelly-fish and corals, hydroids, or plant-like animals of beautiful forms (Zoophytes). ,, IV. ECHINODERMATA. Star-fishes, etc. ,, V. VERMES. Of which the annelidcc are the highest type ; seg- mented or jointed w T orms and leeches. , , VI.'MoLLUSCOlD^E. Including Polyzoa (many animals in colonies) somewhat plant-like, and often mistaken for seaweeds. VII. MOLLUSCA. Shell-fish, etc. ,, VIII. ARTHROPODA. Jointed legs or " foot-stalks." Insects, and the Crustacea. ,, IX. VERTEBRATA. The foregoing tables show us that later scientific research has led to sub-divisions of certain types or groups, so that Cuvier's four have been more than doubled. For example, Insects and Crustacea (with jointed limbs) are separated from the worms and leeches ; and instead of being only a class of the extensive sub- kingdom ANNULOSA are now the " Branch " or Sub-Kingdom ARTHROPODA. Having, however, the " ringed, " "jointed/' or '' segmented " bodies as well as appendages, they are, as Kirby tells us in his Introduction to British Butterflies, " called variously Arthropoda, Annidosa, or Articulata y" the latter word having INTRODUCTION. 13 reference to the jointed bodies in opposition to the bony articula- tions of the VERTEBRATA. Again, regarding the little animals, the " Pets " of these pages they formerly belonged to the class Reptilia^ of which Batrachia, Sauria, Ophidia, Chelonia^ were four orders. But now, as already explained, BATRACHIA is a class by itself, of which Frogs and Newts are two orders, Anoura (without tails) and Vrodela (with long tails), or, as our latest authority, Boulenger, distinguishes them, Ecaudata and Caudata. And it is quite possible that renewed studies of the Reptilia may lead to still farther divisions of Groups ; because, since the publication of any of the works above quoted, a very remarkable discovery has been made in some members of the lizard tribe no less than the existence of a third eye near the top of the head, and directed skywards. Anguis fragilis, our English slow-worm, is one of the lizards in which vestiges of this surprising organ have been detected, and which will be further described in its place. And this discovery is said to have been brought about through the study of some small marine creatures which have not even a head ! They are Acephalous molluscs, commonly known as " sea- squirts," but scientifically Tunicates, or Asridians, the former word implying a tunic-like covering, and the latter their form, which is Fig i. (Half natural size) , incurrent aperture ; b, excurrent aperture. Fig 2. something like a leather sac or bottle (fig. i). Just now I spoke of the microscope revealing new organisms and unexpected relation- 14 INTRODUCTION. ships, and here is a case in point. These Tunicates, belonging to the division or sub-kingdom MOLLUSCOID.E, were for a time regarded as zoophytes, some of them sociably living, several in a colony, like buds on a stem, and even fixed to one spot (fig. 2). Though in their adult state they possess but slight indications of sensibility, they have a heart, respiratory organs, and some of them a single eye in the middle of their transparent body ; but in external form they have no resemblance whatever to a vertebrated animal. Some features in their early development, however, give promise of better things. They are at first free-swimming tad- poles, with an indication of backbone ; and when we come to talk about the frog we will give another glance at these Tunicates, which just now appear to be exciting much interest among biolo- gists. A very large collection of them, brought home in the Challenger, after the voyage of 1872-76, has been lately arranged in 102 species, and described for the first time by Prof. Herdman (1886), stimulating researches in various other classes of verte- brates. Not even yet, though specialists have been hard at work in their various branches, are the results of the Challenger expe- dition fully known. Each year new species of minute organisms are described and announced ; almost daily is new light thrown on hitherto doubtful biological questions ; and thus it is that new classifications and additional Sub-kingdoms are so frequently established. It has been in order to convey some insight into the intricacies of zoological science, and to introduce the three-eyed lizards, that I have dwelt somewhat on the Invertebrated groups. And there remain a few words still to be added concerning embryology ; the structure of the embryo, or immature animal, being, in the eyes of most living biologists, even more important for classification than that of the adult. Darwin affirmed it to be " one of the most important subjects in the whole round of natural history," because there is a law in embryonic development that to quote Darwin again " various parts in the same individual which are exactly alike in the embryonic period, become widely different, and serve for widely different purposes, in the adult state." And it is the early development that indicates the adult relationship, whether to bird, mammal, or fish. This will be evident when, as one of the examples of development, we come to compare the Tunicate tadpole with that of the frog. The eggs of frogs and newts being transparent, the development can be watched from day to day, almost hourly, indeed, in a favourable temperature. And in the whole range of natural history there can scarcely be a more interesting and engrossing study than to contemplate the INTRODUCTION. 1 J gradual transformation of an egg into a tadpole. As far as a certain stage the process or progress is the same in all eggs, whether of birds, fishes, or reptiles; but we will reserve the examination of the frog embryos for the present. Enough has been said in this already lengthened Introduction to the Verte- brates. REPTILES AND BATRACHIANS. CHAPTER I. REPTILES GENERALLY. THERE are certain characteristics which belong alike to the whole of the class Reptilia, and for the present we may include the Batrachia. All are cold-blooded ; that is, they have not sufficient warmth in themselves to maintain a given bodily heat under adverse circumstances. In popular words, they are " obedient to surrounding temperature." Human beings, by the healthy cir- culation of the blood, and independent of external changes, main- tain a temperature of about 98, which is called " blood heat." We suffer discomfort from cold when the degree is much below this ; and we suffer from a feverish condition when the blood is much over-heated ; but reptiles, notwithstanding inability to maintain such bodily warmth, suffer neither from excessive cold nor extreme heat. In the latter case they are in greater vigour, more alive, in fact ; and in the former condition they succumb even to the verge of death without suffering. In winter, burying themselves in the cold damp soil, their vitality is at its lowest, some have been known to be actually imbedded in ice and yet revive by a gradual thaw, and this for successive winters. I have heard of snakes being found frozen and as brittle as a dry stick, but recovering by gradual warmth. On the contrary, in the summer many of them endure tropical heat, and lie basking under a sun, similar exposure to whose rays would destroy the life of some animals. In hot countries the regularly recurring period of torpor is aestivation, when many reptiles bury themselves in the mud, and are literally baked up in a temporary tomb. In cooler countries the hibernation is on the approach of cold weather. The total REPTILES GENERALLY. I/ suspension of vital forces is something like what vegetation under- goes. Circulation and respiration are arrested, and in many cases it is difficult to decide whether life is extinct or not ; but with the return of spring the sun causes the juices whether animal or vegetable to flow once more, and the whole system is set in working order again. Reptiles belong only to the tropical and temperate climates. In the frigid zones they do not exist. The suspension of animation during winter in the cooler latitudes is a beneficent law of nature ; for the food on which the smaller reptiles usually subsist is also gone, and they conveniently hiber- nate until insect life revives. Reptiles are long-lived ; but as they sleep so many months at a time, and exhaust themselves so little, even during their liveliest seasons, there seems no reason why life should not be prolonged. The circulation of reptiles is less complete than that of birds and mammals, the blood being only partially aerated; mingled arterial and venous blood is sent to the lungs and through the system, no part of which is supplied with pure arterialised blood. The heart in general is formed of at most three cavities instead of four, two auricles and one ventricle ; the latter receiving the blood from the two former, i.e., venous blood from the system and aerated blood from the lungs, producing what we should call poor blood, having fewer of the red corpuscles, and, in the animal, a consequent sluggishness of movement, insensibility, and slow organic functions. In intelligence reptiles rank only a little above fishes. Their powers of endurance, however, are very great. They can do without food for a long while, and even without air, and do not appear to suffer from an injury which to the higher animals would cause great pain ; as, for instance, the lopping off of a finger, or even a hand, or an inch or so of tail. Imagine the " to do " of a monkey under such cir- cumstances. All reptiles are oviparous, producing young from an egg, the covering of which may be membranous, leathery, or calcareous. In some cases the young are born alive, but that is only because the eggs have been already hatched within the parent. For the different conditions the terms oviparous, viviparous, and ovovivi- parous are used. All reptiles cast their skin at irregular periods, at least once, but more frequently four or five times during the year. This is called sloughing or desquamation ; the latter word, as it signifies rather a coming off of the scales, is not always applicable; for unless the creature is in adverse circumstances the slough is cast entire. All the reptiles I have ever watched under favourable conditions cast their coat entire, beginning at 1 8 REPTILES AND BATRACHIANS. the mouth. In the account of each we shall recur again to this subject. In the above particulars all reptiles and batrachians are alike ; but in form and action no single class of animals are less alike. To compare one with another and the various orders some with four legs, some with two legs, or no legs, with a tail and without, some covered with a hard, solid case, others with strong plates, some with scales, and some with only a soft, smooth, and ex- ceedingly sensitive skin, some with a spine reduced to a few joints, while in others it is extended to three or four hundred vertebra ; some with eyelids and others without, we should scarcely pronounce them all of a class, and yet their internal organism is alike in all. Their movements are as varied as their form. Among them some fly, others creep, crawl, or glide. A frog " hops," leaps really, and with wonderful skill and precision, and swims in the true scientific manner ; a tortoise creeps, and to save its life it can only creep, therefore never attempting escape in peril, it retires within its fortress, and is there safe. There are frogs and lizards that live in trees and can fly, but not with wings. Fig. 3. Flying Frog. The frog (fig. 3) has exceedingly long fingers and toes, with a strong membrane between each, so that when outspread they are like four fans, each covering some considerable space, and enabling it to take leaps from branch to branch, or to let itself down to the ground and up again supported by these four fans, like parachutes, to break its fall. The little flying lizard, Draco volans (fig. 4), is similarly sustained in its leaps, but by five or six of its middle ribs, REPTILES GENERALLY. which are extremely elongated, and covered with the extended skin of its sides. The most active among rep- tiles, and possessing the most varied movements, are lizards and snakes, which latter, strange to say, though without legs, wings, fins, or any other appendages to assist locomotion, can do all and much more than all the rest can do. They can even let themselves down from a tree, or spring from branch to branch as easily as the flying frogs and lizards, swinging like an acrobat, springing, leaping, and climbing like a monkey, and when on the ground vanishing like a flash in their swift gliding. Without hands the constricting snakes can grasp their prey with the coils of their body ; without fins they can swim like a fish \ and they can even do two or three things at once through the wonderful adaptation of their spine to meet emergencies. It is the peculiar construction of the spine which enables them to accomplish all this. Owen, Huxley, and other distinguished anatomists write enthusiastically of the beautiful adaptation of a snake's spine to its needs. Each vertebra is elaborately articulated to the next and to the ribs by eight joints ; and each interlocks with the one next to it by a cup and ball-shaped process. Here (fig. 5) you see a front and a back view of one single vertebra, and cm imagine the pliancy of movement all these cup and ball arrange- , , . , a, posterior view. ments would give to a long spine, and why they are justly called vertebra, from verto, to turn. The Fig. 4. Flying Lizard. 6, anterior view. 20 REPTILES AND BATRACHIANS. above achievements relate more particularly to the constricting snakes. Our British species are similarly endowed, if in a less degree. Reptiles are, for the most part, carnivorous ; a few are"vegetable or fruit- eaters, and some are both. CHAPTER II. i THE OPHIDIA. FIRST let us decide their true place in the great ANIMAL KINGDOM that includes such perplexing myriads to be classified. Snakes having, for their size, more vertebra in their spinal column than any other animals, claim, of course, to be assigned to the sub-kingdom VERTEBRATA. And that they are true reptiles is no less evident, therefore they belong to the CLASS REPTILIA. But here arises a question which formerly caused much difference of opinion, on account of the many creatures of a snake-like form that exist ; such as the little slow-worm, which is still known as anguis, though not a snake. There are also some frogs (as the coecilia\ a few fishes, and many lizards, even some very large worms, all of which are snake-like in form and without limbs. For us of to-day these difficulties have been cleared away, the true snakes have been separated from the rest, and the question, therefore, "What kind or ORDER of reptiles are they?" is answered by ORDER OPHIDIA. Next there come sub-divisions and sub-orders. Snakes are divided into Venomous and Non- venomous, and are arranged in three sub-orders ; viz., Colubrines^ the harmless snakes ; Viperines, the vipers ; and the Venomous Columbrines ; the latter, having the form and aspect of harm- less snakes, though venomous. You may easily discern the great difference between these latter and the vipers on your next visit to the Zoological Gardens, The Cobra and the Ophiophagus are slender and symmetrical, like the harmless Indian river snakes on the opposite side of the Reptilium and our English ring-snake ; and unless you knew them already you would not suppose them to be so deadly. But the African Puff-adder, and the Rattle- snakes, thick, heavy, flat-headed, and rough-scaled, seem to betray their venomous qualities at once. Thus the three sub-divisions are 1. OPHIDIA COLUBRIFORMES. 2. OPHIDIA COLUBRIFORMES VENENOSI. 3. OPHIDIA VIPERIFORMES. 22 REPTILES AND BATRACHIANS. Two of our English snakes belong to the first and one to the third sub-order. There is a prevailing impression among persons who have not given any special attention to snakes or serpents that the two words imply different kinds of reptiles, the latter being often associated with the more formidable and dangerous, and the former with the less harmful kinds. A snake and a serpent are one and the same reptile, the distinction being philological and not zoological. The word " serpent " is from the Latin serpo, to creep, and this from the Greek ep7ro>. Serpo or Jterpo had reference to the creeping movements, and was applied to' crawling creatures generally. So also was the Saxon word " snake," from snaca, used for all the small reptiles of northern Europe. The two words belong to the history of Great Britain. "Serpent" having been introduced by the Romans became incorporated with the language of the country long before the northern invaders made their appearance here. From the Romans came tales of enormous and fearful serpents ; and when the Scandinavians arrived and talked of their snakes, the word would represent only the smaller reptiles peculiar to the north. The truly English, or rather British word, " snake," came easily from all or any of the words expressing the same in the language of our northern visitors ; the Danes, with their snog or snekke, the Anglo-Saxon snaca, the Swedish snok y and the Icelandic snakr^ snokr, all implied small creeping things, and would naturally represent the same in Britain. The Greek word for a snake exclusively was ophis> from o