MESSIANIC PEOPHECY MESSIANIC PEOPHECY THE PREDICTION OF THE FULFILMENT OF REDEMPTION THROUGH THE MESSIAH A CRTTICAL STUDY OF THE MESSIANIC PASSAGES OF THE OLD TESTAMENT IN THE ORDER OF THEIR DEVELOPMENT CHAELES AUGUSTUS BPJGGS, D.D. 'I DAVENPORT PEOKESSOK OF HEBREW AND THE COGNATE LANGUAGES IN THE UNION THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY, NEW YORK CITY NEW YORK CHARLES SCRIBNEK'S SONS 1886 37 i COPTRIGHT, iaS6, Bt CHARLES SCRIBNER'S SONS. TO THIS BOOK IS DEDICATED AS A MEMENTO OF HAPPY DA I .S IN EDINBURGH. 269469 PREFACE. Messianic Prophecy is the most important of all themes ; for it is the ideal of redemption given by the Creator to our race at the beginning of its history, and it ever abides as the goal of humanity until the divine plan has been accomplished. There is no lack of works upon this subject. They are strewn along the Christian centuries in great abundance. And yet there are very few of them that have more than a transient value ; for they either use Messianic Prophecy as a sword with which to smite the Jew or the infidel ; or else as a crutch for a feeble faith in Christ and Christianity. There are very few of them that show any real interest in the theme for itself ; there are still fewer that are animate with love and devotion to this greatest of all subjects. Messianic Prophecy has been too much dominated by the apologetical and the polemical interests, and the historical and the dogmatic bearings of the theme have been too much neglected. This has given occasion to another common fault in the treatment of the subject. It has not been grasped as a whole and treated by a comprehensive method. Messianic Prophecy does not come to an end with the canon of the Scriptures of the Old Testament, as is commonly supposed. It assumes the same relative position in the Scriptures of the New Testament ; and it vii vm PREFACE. is the crown of the system of Christian doctrine. Hence it di\ddes itself into three gi^eat sections : the Messianic Prophecy of the Old Testament, the Messianic idea of the Xew Testament, and the Messianic ideal in the history of Christian doctrine. Xo one can adequately treat of any one of these sections until he has made a comprehensive study of the whole subject. The volume now given to the public is designed to be the first of a series that will cover the whole ground. It treats of Prophecy in general, of Messianic Prophecy in particular, and then traces the development of the Messianic idea in the Old Testament, concluding with a summary of the ideal therein unfolded. It will remain for a second volume to show how far this ideal has been fulfilled by the first advent of the Messiah, and how far it remained unfulfilled and was taken up into New Testament Prophecy and carried on to a higher stage of development. A third volume should trace the history of the Messianic ideal in the Christian Church, and show its importance in the development of Christian doctrine. Many of our readers will be surprised to find so little reference to the fulfilment of the prophecies. This has commonly been regarded as the most important thing. Accordingly, the prophecies have been studied from the point of view of their supposed fulfilment, and their original meaning and their relation to the system of Messianic Prophecy of the Old Testament have been overlooked. Some prophecies have risen into dispro- portionate prominence and have been exaggerated, while other prophecies of equal and even greater importance have been undervalued, and in some cases entirely neglected. The Messianic ideal of the Old Testament should be treated by itself and for itself, in order that it may be understood as a system in its proportions and PREFACE. IX in tlie inter-relations of its parts. I have not been able to escape altogether from the question of fulfilment. It is probable that a more rigid adherence to the plan that has been proposed would have excluded not a few references to the fulfilment that have found their way into the footnotes and even into the text. But it was not my purpose to undervalue the question of the fulfil- ment of the prophecies, and I did not care to be too strict in this matter. Furthermore, it was designed to treat the fulfilment in its proper place. I have given a summary of the Messianic ideal of the Old Testament at the close of this volume. It will be the work of the second volume to show how far that ideal has been realized in Christ and Christianity, and what still remains to be fulfilled. I have not entered into the history of the interpreta- tion of the passages, but have given the several interpre- tations, chiefly in footnotes, in order to explain those that have been adopted, and to discriminate them from others. The history of the interpretation of the Messianic ideal, according to the proposed scheme, comes into considera- tion in the third volume of the work. The present volume traces the Messianic idea in its development in the Old Testament Scriptures. It does not enter into the Messianic idea of the apocryphal books, or of the Apocalypses, or of the Jewish sects of the four centuries, in the midst of which the first advent occurred, because the Messianic idea of the Old Testament is complete in the canon of the Old Testament. The Messianic ideas of the later Jews have their proper place as an external historical frame in which to set the Messianic idea of Christ and His apostles. I have given the Messianic passages of the Old Testa- ment in English translation, with a very few exceptions where they were of too great length. These translations X PREFACE. have been made from the original text. They have been revised in order to conform with the lievised Version whenever it seemed best so to do, partly because it seemed desirable to recognise and take advantage of the labours of those eminent scholars who have so recently given it to the world ; and partly because I am of the opinion that any future revision must take its departure from this vantage ground. In some cases the Eevised Version has been followed closely ; but in the main it has been used freely and has been departed from not only when fidelity to the original text required it, but also in many cases where I have preferred other render- ings that have become familiar by long use. These renderings are the product of the critical and historical study of the original text, and are not proposed as sub- stitutes for the renderings of the Eevised Version or the Authorized Version, which aim at a version for public use. The author has preferred to transliterate technical words and explain them in footnotes, rather than to trans- late them inadequately or by uncertain renderings. The divine names Jahveh, 'El, 'Adonay, Sluidday, ^Elyon, Jah, have not been translated, because they are proper names of the Deity in most passages, and any translation misses the sense. 'Elohim has been translated God, except in a few passages where it also is used as a divine name. These names are unfamiliar to the English reader, but if he will attend to their use in the successive passages he will observe the importance of the discrimination. Shades of meaning will attract his attention that he could never discover in any version that translates them. The neglect to distinguish between 'Eloliim and 'El not only obscures the difference in meaning, but also dis- regards the use of 'El as a proper name in passages where that use is of some importance. It is necessary PREFACE. XJ in a few words to explain my transliteration of nin^ by Jahveh. I reaffirm what I have said elsewhere.^ It represents the Deity as an ever-living and acting person, who enters into personal relations with His people, and would have them address Him by a proper name in their personal approaches unto Him in prayer and worship. The later Jews, influenced by feelings of profound reverence, which soon passed over into superstition, abstained from pronouncing this name, and substituted for it usually ""inx, " Lord ; " or where ''iis nin*" occurred, wrh^y " G-od" Hence the Massoretes pointed mn^ with the vowel-points which belong to ''iix or wrb^, in order to indicate that these other names of God were to be used in place of mn"" ; and so the original pronunciation of nin^ became lost. Hence in the LXX. and in most translations " Lord," or its equivalent, is substituted for ^1^^ The word " Jehovah " is sometimes used in English for this word. But it is a linguistic ■ monstrosity. Scholars are generally agreed that the original pronuncia- tion was Jahveh (the j pronounced as y). There can be little doubt that the substitution of " Lord " for Jahveh in the translation of the Hebrew Scriptures and in the Jewish Eabbinical Theology, has been associated with an undue stress upon the sovereignty of God. The Old Testament revelation in its use of rv\r\'' emphasized rather the activity of the ever-living personal God of revelation. The doctrine of God needs to be enriched at the present time by the enthronement of the idea of the living God to its supreme place in Biblical theology, and the dethronement of the idea of divine sovereignty from its usurped position in dogmatic theology. Many English scholars prefer the transliteration Yahveh or Yahtveh. I prefer Jahveh, because of its common use by foreign scholars. I should have no objection to the other trans- 1 Presb. Review, July 1885, p. 526. XU PREFACE. literations if scholars would agree to any one of them. Jahvch is a brief, terse, and euphonious word, that has a wealth of meaning and of reminiscence of Biblical passages to all who are familiar with the Hebrew text. It is the name that God Himself gave to His people ; and if any name should be correctly pronounced and written, it would seem that it should be this one above all others. The great majority of the passages are given in the lines and strophes of Hebrew Poetry. This part of the work has cost the author a large amount of severe labour. It has, however, opened up many new problems, and solved many perplexing questions. The author is well aware that there is a large amount of scepticism among Hebrew scholars as to the measurement of the lines and the strophical organization of Hebrew poetry, but this is due chiefly to the long-continued neglect of the subject, and to prejudices begotten partly by an ultra-conservative dislike of so-called novelties and by a timid clinging to the Massoretic system of accentuation. Those who are entitled to rank as authorities in the department of Hebrew Poetry have not doubted that there was some system of strophical arrangement, and some principles by which the lines were arranged ; for how else could Hebrew poetry be Poetry ? The principles that have been followed in the arrangement of the lines and strophes have been tried by some years of study and teaching, and have been applied with success to the greater part of the poetry of the Old Testament. These principles have enabled the author to discover several pieces of poetry in the Old Testament that have been previously unknown. I am assured of the correctness of these principles, and also of that arrangement of the great majority of the passages that is given in the book. But some of the passages are so difficult that the arrangement that I have PKEFACE. Xill given is tentative rather than final. The whole is sub- mitted to the judgment of the candid scholar who has eyes to see the beauties of Hebrew Poetry. I have come to the conclusion that it would be no great task for an English poet to reproduce the entire body of Hebrew Poetry in corresponding English poetry of the same rhythm and strophical organization. If a real poet should perform this work he would confer an inestimable boon upon the English-speaking race, and give a version of the Old Testament that would be better adapted for popular use than any English version that translates Hebrew poetry into English prose. ■ The original text of all the passages has been studied in accordance with the principles of Textual Criticism. The Massoretic text not infrequently errs when compared with the ancient versions, and there are not a few passages where the principles of Hebrew Poetry aid us to a better text than that of any of the ancient authorities. No true scholar will despise critical conjecture in cases where the external evidence is unsatisfactory, and the text is manifestly corrupt. The author has taken great pains in this department of his work. The results are found in the translation, but the explanation of these results are given in the footnotes. These results will not please those who esteem the Massoretic text as well- nigh infallible. We have no hope of overcoming the prejudices of such scholars. We have done our work for those who have faith in the principles and methods of the Science of Textual Criticism.-^ A most difficult task, that could not be avoided, was the arrangement of the passages in the order of their historical origin. A mechanical arrangement of the pas- sages after the traditional method pursued by Hengsten- berg, J. Pye-Smith, and most scholars who have written ^ See my Biblical Study ^ p. 138 seq. XIV PREFACE. upon Messianic Prophecy would have heen an easy task. But this method gives us nothing better than a string of exegetical papers without organic connection. Messianic Prophecy is a section of Biblical Theology. It should be treated in accordance with the principles and methods of that branch of Biblical Science. The development of the Messianic idea is therefore of vast importance, and all the passages must take their place in their historical order, or that development cannot be traced to its full extent. The traditional position of many of these passages will not bear serious examination. It is impossible to adhere to the traditional theories, and make anything of a development of the Messianic ideal. These theories perish before the breath of Biblical Theology as well as by the knife of the Higher Criticism. The principles of the Higher Criticism and of Biblical Theology have been faithfully applied, and the author has reached much greater satisfaction in the results of the investigation than he deemed to be possible at the outset. I shall not deny that there are many cases of doubt, especially in the arrangement of the Psalms. But in all cases of doubt it has seemed best to connect the doubtful passages with other passages of similar import, where they seemed to iit best in the development of the Messianic ideal. In general, the results correspond with those reached by the great critics of the century ; but in some cases I have been compelled to depart from them, and in some important passages to advance new theories which are submitted to the judgment of all those who are in earnest in the work of Biblical Criticism and Biblical Theology. This work is designed chiefly for theological students and ministers of the gospel. Accordingly I have carefully summed up the Messianic idea of each passage or group of passages in a compact and comprehensive statement. PREFACE. XV These I have arranged in a series of sections that are numbered consecutively throughout the volume. Thus the student has an outline of the work for the purposes of review and as a preparation for an examination upon the subject. I have also furnished him with a critical apparatus in the footnotes for the study of the Messianic passages. These discuss all the important questions of textual criticism, higher criticism, philological explanation, and exegesis. The larger type of the book confines itself for the most part to the Messianic ideal as a part of Biblical Theology. All that is technical has been thrown into footnotes, and stands there by itself for the con- venient use of the Hebrew student. The text is thus relieved of Hebrew words and critical discussions, so that any intelligent reader may use the book without being disturbed by anything that he cannot readily understand. For the author desires that his book may be of service to the thoughtful layman, and to Sabbath-school teachers, none of whom can be at all successful in their study of the Scriptures unless they know something about the Messianic idea that meets them everywhere in the sacred pages. The author has devoted many years of study in preparation for the present work. It has cost him more labour than all other topics combined. It has been a labour of love and enthusiasm. And yet the theme is so great, so wonderful, so glorious, and so divine, that he has pursued it only to find that it escapes his grasp and transcends his efforts. He gives his work to the world, because he is convinced that a fresh study of the whole subject is greatly needed, and because he is assured that he has a contribution to make to its further discussion. At the same time he cordially invites the criticism of com- petent scholars. No one will be more ready than the author to welcome fresh light from any source. He prays xvi PEEFACK that whatever there may be of error in the book may be detected and slain. The truth will take care of itself. It cannot be resisted by the blind inertia of con- servatism, or overcome by the mad rush of radicahsm. Truth is divine, and it will prevail over all obstacles and enemies. TABLE OF CONTENTS. CHAPTER I. Hebrew Prophecy, p. 1. I. The essential principle of Prophecy, p. 2. II. Tlie phases of Prophecy, p. 5. III. The Montanistic theory of Hebrew Pro-phacy, p. 12. IV. The Naturalistic theory of Prophecy, p. 17. V. The distinguishing features of Hebrew Prophecy, p. 18. VI. The prophetic call and endowment, p. 20. VII. The test of Prophecy p. 22. VIII. The development of Prophecy^ p. 24. IX. The prophetic idealy p. 28. CHAPTER II. Predictive Prophecy, p. 34. t. The sources of Prediction, p. 36. II. Divine source of Hebrew Prediction, p. 39. III. The symbolical form of Hebrew Predic- tion, p. 43. IV. The limits of Prediction, p. 55. V. Messianic Prophecy, p. 60. VI. The fulfilment of Messianic Prophecy, p 63. CHAPTER III. Primitive Messianic Ideas, p. 67. I. The Protevangehtim, -p. 11. II. The blessing of JShem, -p. *7*7. III. The blessing of Abraham^ p. 83. IV. The blessing of Judahy p. 93. CHAPTER TV. Messianic Prophecy in the Mosaic Age, p. 100. I. Iwrael the son ofJahveh, p. 100. IL The kingdom of God, p. 101. b XVm CONTENTS. III. The conquering Star, p. 104. IV. The everlasting p'iest' hood, p. 109. V. The prophet like Moses, p. 110. Vl. The blessing and the curse, p. 115. CHAPTER V. The Messianic Idea in the Davidic Period, p. 121. I. The faithful priesthood, p. 122. II. The all-Jcnowiing judge, p. 123. III. The covenant with David, p. 126. IV. The con- quering hing^ p. 132. V. The enthroned Messiah, p. 1 34. VI. The righteous king, p. 137. VII. The bridal of the Messiah, p. 140. VIII. The advent of Jahveh as deliverer, p. 143. IX. Jahveh the victorious king, p. 145. X. The ideal tnan, p. 146. XI. The ideal man triumphant in death, p. 148. CHAPTER VI. Messianic Ideas of the earlier Prophets, p. 153. I. The day of Jahveh, p. 154. II. The rebuilding of the ruined house of David, p. 161. III. The Restoration of Israel, p. 165. CHAPTER VII. Isaiah and his Contemporaries, p. 180. I. The exaltation of the house of Jahveh, p. 181. II. The king of J^eace, p. 184. III. Restoration through the sea Trouble, p. 185. IV. The rejected shepherd^ p. 187. V. Purification of Zion, p. 193. VI. Immanuel, p. 195. VII. The prince of peace, p. 198. VIII. The fruitful shoot, \i. 201. IX. Union of Egypt and Assyria with Israel, p. 206. X. Tlie coi'ner-stone of Zion, p. 208. XL Zion the city of the great king, p. 210. XII. The ruler from Bethlehem, p. 217. CHAPTER VIII. Jeremiah and his Contemporaries, p. 220. I. The great judgment of Jahveh, p. 221. II. The adoption of the nations in Zion, j). 226. III. Tlie restoration of the vine Israel, p. 228. IV. The advent of Jahveh in glory, p. 233. V. The righteous judge, p, 237. VI. Jerusalem the throne of Jahveh, p. 242. VII. The righteous branch, p. 244. VIII. The restoration and the CONTENTS. XIX n&io covenant^ p. 246. IX. The inviolable covenant with David, p. 258. CHAPTER IX. EZEKIEL, p. 266. I. Jahvch the sanctuary^ p. 268. II. The wonderful cedar sprig, p. 269. III. The rightful king, p. 270. IV. The faithful shepherd, p. 272. Y . The great jmrification, ^.^4:. N\. The great resur- rection, p. 275. VII. The great reunion, p. 277. VIII. The judgment of Gog, p. 279. IX. The holy land of the restoration, p. 283. CHAPTER X. Prophetic Voices out of the Exile, p. 291. I, The destruction of the great metropolis and the annihilation of death and sorrow, p. 296. II. The blood bath of Jahveh, p. 311. III. The transformation of nature, p. 317. IV. The great sufferer, p. 320. CHAPTER XI. The Prophecy of the Servant of Jahveh, p. 337. I. The firrvant m whom Jahveli is well pleased, p. 342. II, Jahveh delivers his servant Israel, p. 348. III. The high calling of the servant, p. 352. IV. The sin-bearing servant, p. 356. V. The great invitation, p. _363. VI. The reward of righteousness, p. 365. VII. The great preacher, p. 369. CHAPTER XII. The Prophecy of the Restoration of Zion, p. 374. I. JahveVs highway to Zion, p. 374. II. Jahveh the only God and Saviour, p. 378. III. Jahveh is faithful to Zion, p. 381. IV. Jahveh the comforter of Zion, p. 387. V. Jahveh' s house of prayer for all nations, p. 391. VI. Zion the light of the world, p. 394. VII. The new Jerusalem, the 7iew heavens and new earth, p. 402. CHAPTER XIII. Daniel, p. 410. I. The kingdom of the son of man, p. 412. II. The last times, p. 421. XX CONTENTS. CHAPTER Xiy. The Messianic Idea in the times of the Eestoration, p. 428. I. The march of Jdhveh^ p. 429. II. The glory of the new temple^ p. 436. III. The glory of the neiv Jerusalem^ p. 438. IV. The crowning oj the priest-king, p. 442. Y. Jahveh the holy king, p. 448. VI . The land of the glory of Jahveh, p. 457. VII. The ideal man triumphant over evil, p. 459. VIII. The smitten shepherd, p. 462. IX. The unique day, p. 466. X The second Elijah, p. 473. CHAPTER XV. The Messianic Ideal, p. 476. I. The ideal of mankind, p. 476. II. The conflict with evil, p. 478. III. The Divine advent, p. 478. IV. The holy land, p. 481. Y, Jahveh the father and husband, p. 482. VI. The kingdom of God, p. 483. VII. The day of Jahveh, p. 487. YIII. The holy priesthood, p. 490. IX. The faithful prophet, p. 491. X. The Messianic King, p. 492. XI. The new covenanty p. 496, INDEXES. Index of Texts, p. 501. General Index^ p. 618. MESSIAJJ^IC PROPHECY. CHAPTEK I. ' HEBREW PROPHECY. § 1. Prophecy is religious instruction. It is an essential feattire of the religion of cultivated nations. It first appears as a function, then develops into an office, and at last organizes an order. Prophecy appears in any religion so soon as the need is felt of religious instruction, and therefore at a very early stage and among the most primitive peoples. It manifests itself at first in occasional and sporadic forms ; but as the religion advances into higher stages, it develops into an office in order to give official guidance in religious knowledge and practice. In the patriarchal constitution of society the three functions of authority, prophecy, priesthood and royalty are ordinarily combined in the father of the family and the chief of the tribe ; but at a very early stage the function of royalty is eliminated, and develops into the office of a monarch, and at a later stage into a dynasty : so the function of priesthood is elimi- nated and develops into an office and an order, which perpetuates itself by lineal descent or adoption. The prophetic function is ordinarily the last to develop into a separate order. It retains its closer relations with the A 2 MESSIANIC PROPHECY. Deity, and therefore for a longer period maintains its in- dependence of human relationships. In the highest religions the three orders exist side by side ; but the pro- phetic order seldom develops beyond schools or guilds. This difference of the three functions in historical de- velopment originates from an essential difference in the functions themselves; for the function of royalty expresses the idea of government, the function of priesthood shapes the idea of worship, but the function of prophecy is the channel of religious instruction. o L THE ESSENTIAL PRINCIPLE OF PROPHECY. § 2. Pro-phccy as religious instruction claims to come from God and to possess divine autliority. The iwoijliet is an officer of the Deity, ivith a commission from the God whom he serves. Hebrew prophecy differs from other prophecy as the Hebrew religion differs from other religions. It has the common features which disting-uish prophecy from priest- hood and royalty. It has specific features which mark it off from the prophecy of all other religions. It is our purpose to rise from these common features to the specific features of Hebrew prophecy. Prophecy as a special function of religion has the essential characteristics of religion itself. It involves some sort of union and communion between the Deity and man, whether it be real or ideal, traditional and fictitious, or historically evolved from divine communica- tions, pretended, in order to power and influence, or presumed, owing to the deceptions of e\al spirits, and abnormal personal conditions and circumstances. In any case, the prophet claims to come from God to impart religious instruction. The Sacred Scriptures recognise the Hebrew prophets HEBKEW PROPHECY. 3 as a species in the general class of prophets. The pro- phet of Jahveh speaks in the name of Jahveh, as the prophet of Baal speaks in the name of Baal. Hebrew prophecy claims to be divine revelation. But other prophecy makes the same claim. Where then is the difference ? On the one side it is urged that Hebrew prophecy is all true, and that the prophecy of all other religions is spurious and false. On the other side it is claimed that Hebrew prophecy, like all other prophecy, is a mixture of the true and the false. It is in fashion with a certain sort of Christian apolo- gists to ignore the science of religion, and insist upon the supernatural character of Biblical prophecy over against the purely human, natural or false prophecy of the other religions. They decline to recognise anything in common between Biblical prophecy and other prophecy. Such opinions may now be regarded as antiquated.^ The scholar observes that the same exclusive claims are put forth in the interest of the other great religions of the world, that their prophecy is the only genuine prophecy, and that Hebrew prophecy, in its present form at least, is spurious and false. Is the debate to be settled by the loudest and the longest dogmatism ? Eather the inherent truth and reality of the prophecies are the determining factors and the final tests. The science of religion is in entire accord with Hebrew prophecy, in insisting upon the application of the supreme test, of veracity. Biblical prophecy claims to be true and real. It fears not the most searching criticism. Those silly Uzzahs who fear for the ark of God are guilty of pre- ^ See Kliper, Das Prophetenthum des Alien Bundes, p. 5, Leipzig 1870. Tholuck justly states, "Wie gross audi der Sf)ielrauni der dem Priesterbetrug und aberglaubischer Selbstfauschuiig zuge- schrieben werden mag-dass eine Realitat dabei zu Grunde gelegen, ist nun allgemein bei Philologen und Alterthumsforschern zur Anerkennung gekommen." — Die Propheten, p. 2, Gotha 1860. 4 MESSIANIC PROPHECY. sumption when they stretch forth impotent hands to prevent investigation. But real Christian scholars who are faithful to the word of God are not only willing that the tests should be applied by the doubtful and the in- quiring ; but they are determined to destroy doubt and to solicit faith by applying the tests themselves in the most thorough, comprehensive and exhaustive investiga- tion. For the fires of criticism consume the hay, straw and stubble of human conceits and inventions which sprang from false methods of interpretation and preconceived theories of what prophecy ought to be. But all that is really valuable abides the test and rises in majesty above the ashes of human traditions. Hebrew prophecy does not claim to be the only genuine prophecy. The Old Testament Scriptures represent pro- phecy as extending beyond the range of the chosen people in Melchizedek, Jethro, and Balaam.-^ It is not necessary, in the interests of the Christian religion, to insist that God left all other nations except Israel without religious guidance. The more the great historic religions of the world are studied in their genesis and their relations to the peoples who were influenced by them, the more truth, beauty and good are found in them. They had their appropriate task in preparing the nations of the world for the higher religion when it should come to them in the fulness of time.^ It was once the fashion to explain the good features of the other religions as relics of the primitive divine revelations recorded in the Bible, or as derived in some mysterious way from the Hebrews. But this fashion has passed away with the unscientific age. It has become evident that the facts are entirely different. The excellent features of the prophecy of the great historic religions of * Gen. xiv. 18 ; Ex. xviii. ; Num. xxiii.-xxiv. * See Cave, Introduction to Theology^ p. 168 seq., Edin. 1886. HEBKEW PROPHECY. 5 the world should be recognised and not resisted. If they are not as high in their order as the Biblical religions, they are still historic religions that have served multi- tudes of our race in their efforts to worship the Deity. It is unwise to explain them away by violent interpre- tations. Those who attack these religions by putting the worst constructions upon their prophecy ought to remember that they encourage the enemies of the Christian religion to treat Hebrew prophecy in the same arbitrary way. No argument can safely be used against heathen prophecy that may react to the damage of Hebrew pro- phecy. All prophecy must submit to the same tests. The tests will determine the extent of truth and false- hood in every prophecy of every religion. It is the Biblical and the scientific method to examine the pheno- mena and to abide by the results.^ II. THE PHASES OF PROPHECY. § 3. There are three phases of prophecy which are common to the religions of the world — the dream, the vision, and the enlightened spiritual discernment, 1 We are entirely agreed with Dr. Maiidsley, " If all visions, intuitions and other modes of communication with the supernatural, accredited now or at any time, have been no more than phenomena of psychology, — instances, that is, of subnormal, supernormal, or abnormal mental function, — and if all existing supernatural beliefs are survivals of a state of thought befitting lower stages of human development, the continuance of such beliefs cannot be helpful, it must be hurtful, to human progress." — Natural Causes and Super- natural Seemings, pp. 361-62, London 1886. But it is altogether unscientific to conclude from the fact that a very large number of supposed communications with the supernatural have been shown to be spurious, that therefore all others, even those of the Biblical religions, must be spurious likewise. A searching examination dis- criminates between true and false prophecy, just as clearly as it exposes every form of false science and philosophy. Men of science like Dr. Maudsley are as liable to slip in their hostility to the super- natural, as are theologians in their prejudices in favour of the supernatural. b MESSIANIC PROPEECY. These three phases of prophecy are familiar to the reader of the Scriptures. But he will find them also in the great religions of the world. The prophet Joel embraces them in his representation of the universal distribution of the prophetic gifts in the last age of the world, when the divine Spirit comes upon all classes and conditions of men. " Your sons and your daughters will prophesy, Your old men will dream dreams, Your young men will see visions." — ^Joel iii. 1. § 4. The dream is the simplest phase of prophecy. It may arise from an abnormal condition of the tody, or from the stimulation of a higher 'power. It may he genuine prophecy or spurious prophecy. Tliere is n£ed of discrimi- nating tests. A dream has something of the wonderful about it, however it may originate. The man is so far passive to the impressions that are made upon him from without. Even when an excited organism or an abnormal condition of the body occasions the dream, it is beyond the control of the will of the subject ; he is passive to the operations of his own higher powers, even though in some sense directing them. He is unable to resist the movement of his intellectual and emotional nature, which is hurried on by an impulse external to himself. It is not surprising that uncultivated persons and rude nations should ascribe this impulse to e\il spirits or the heavenly powers. There is indeed in the spontaneous workings of the intellectual and emotional nature in dreams a facility which is unknown except in sleep. Unguided and unrestrained by external considerations and circum- stances, or by the higher motives and principles of the reason and the will, the human spirit rushes on like a mountain torrent into the impending evil, or wings its HEBKEW PROPHECY. 7 flight like an eagle to the coining good. There is not infrequently in the dream an instinctive discernment of the issues of the present circumstances in which we or others may be involved. The dream plays an important part in the prophecy of the Bible, in guiding the patriarchs of Israel and the human guardians of the Messiah, in the deliverance of Israel in Egypt and at Babylon. But the dream is a trouble to the monarchs of Egypt and Babylon without an interpreter. A Joseph and a Daniel were needed to voice their prophecies. But to the patriarchs and other sacred persons the dream was accompanied with its pro- phetic interpretation. The dream may or may not be prophetic. It may be instinctive prophecy or it may be divine prophecy. It may bear its interpretation with itself or it may need a prophetic interpreter. Tliis prophetic interpreter may be a real prophet or he may be self-deceived or a deceiver. The dream is therefore simply a phase of prophecy, a test is needed to determine whether there be prophecy in it or not. § 5. The most common phase of pro])hecy is the ecstatic state. This may he either naturalj as in epileptics and persons who through nervous derangement have an abnormal intellectual and emotional development, or artificial, where the nervous organization is excited hy external stimulaiits, or the agency of evil spirits, or the divine Spirit. In a rude and uncultivated age epileptic and deranged persons are regarded as possessed by evil spirits or the divine Spirit. Whether the spirit be good or evil, the Spirit of the one God or the influence of some one deity of a polytheistic system, depends more upon the religion of the people than upon the phenomenon itself. Such persons have strange experiences and utter marvellous sayings, which are regarded as coming from the Deity to warn 8 MESSIANIC PEOPHECY. and guide mankind. These are unnatural and beyond experience, they are therefore regarded as supernatural. The ecstatic state is commonly produced by artificial means. Those peculiarly inclined to it learn the art of casting themselves into it, in order to enjoy the benefits to be derived therefrom. The prophets of Baal cut themselves with knives, and cried out for hours in frenzy for prophetic inspiration. The 450 prophets of Baal "called on the name of Baal from morning even until noon, saying, O Baal, answer us. But there was no voice, nor any that answered. And they leaped about the altar which was made. And it came to pass at noon, that Elijah mocked them, and said, Cry with a loud voice, for he is god ; either he is musing, or he is gone aside, or he has a journey, or peradventure he sleepeth, and he must be awaked. And they cried with a loud voice, and cut themselves after their manner with swords and lances until the blood gushed out upon them. And it was so, when mid- day was past, that they prophesied until the time of the offering up of the Minchah.^^ ^ The necromancers are represented as chirping and muttering in the practice of their art.^ The Shamans of Eastern Asia use a tambourine and stimulants until they cast themselves into an unconscious state, and then are aroused to answer questions which are put to them. Their answers are often surprisingly accurate, although they know nothing that has transpired when they awake into consciousness again.^ The Grecian prophetesses were filled with the prophetic ecstasy by the foul gases 1 1 Kings xviii. 26 seq. HDD = leap, dance, h]) is at or about the altar. It is the sacred dance, the frenzied ecstatic whirling. I prefer to leave nni?D untranslated and transliterate it. It is the evening vegetable offering, probably consisting of grain or cakes. There is danger of misconce]jtion in the rendering " oblation " given in the R.Y. as well as in the "sacrifice" of the A.V. There is no good reason for thinking that nmo is here used for offering in general, and there is lack of evidence as to the exact kind of vege- table offering used at this time. 2 Tsa. viii. 19. ^ Tholuck, Die Propheten^ p. 8 seq. HEBREW rr.OPHECY. 9 arising from clefts in the rocks. There the Grecian oracles were established and temples erected as at Delphi, Dodona and elsewhere."^ At the present day the Dervishes of Mahometans cast themselves into the ecstatic state by whirling themselves in a circle or by howling for a long time. The Indian Fakirs cut them- selves with knives as did the ancient prophets of Baal. There are also in the unconscious somnambulism and the gift of second sight kindred phenomena. In these ecstatic conditions involving unconsciousness to the external world the inner emotional and intellectual nature moves with great rapidity and freedom, and, as in the dream, reaches solutions of difficult problems and discerns the issues of events far and near. As in the dream so in the ecstatic state, there may be instinctive prediction and instinctive guidance through difficulties ; or there may be entire failure. Biblical prophecy exhibits similar conditions of ecstasy. We have a picture of a band of prophets coming down from the high place with psaltery and timbrel and pipe and harp, and prophesying ; and Saul meeting them, the Spirit of Jahveh came upon him and he prophesied with them.^ Again Saul went to seek David and " the Spirit of God came upon him, and he went on and prophesied until he came to Naioth in Eamah. And he also stripped off his clothes, and he also prophesied before Samuel, and fell down naked all that day and all that night. Wherefore they say. Is Saul also among the prophets ? " ^ As in the dream, so now in the ecstatic state. It is common to the religions of mankind. It is not absent from the Hebrew religion. It is not peculiar to the Hebrew religion. There is nothing in the ecstatic state as such to determine whether it results from divine ^ Tholuck, Die PropheteUy p. 6 seq, ; Maudsley in I.e. p. 176 seq. * 1 Sam. X. 5 seq. ^ 1 Sam. xix. 23 seq. 10 MESSIANIC PKOniECY. influence or not. Every ecstatic state should be tested ere it be accepted as the product of genuine prophecy.^ §*6. There is also a higher order of prophets, who through retirement and contemplation of the sacred mysteries 1 If we are not to assume, with the ignorant and barbarous races, that the ecstatic state always has something of the supernatural about it, we are also not to assume, with modern naturalistic scholars, that the ecstatic state is never employed by supernatural powers. For if the ecstatic state may be occasioned by disease or by stimulants, why may it not be occasioned by the stimulation of an evil spirit or a good spirit ? True science will not close its eyes to the question. There is no a priori objection to it that does not arise beyond the domain of science, namely, in scepticism as to the supernatural, or positive denial of the supernatural, Maudsley is obliged to admit that the best work of the world has been done under illusion (in I.e. p. 207), and that those who believe seriously in the transcendent importance of human life, take it in tragic;il earnest, and are reaily to sacrifice strength and wealth and even life in its service, are mainly or wholly dupes (p. 240). But most sober- minded students will conclude that the serious, the devout, the self- sacrificing reformers of the world are after all more likely to be correct when they claim that they have been guided by a higher power, and that the illusion and self-deception are rather with those who cannot understand them, and who stubbornly close their eyes to all the avenues that lead to the God of all grace. Kuenen is more scientific when he says — " A specific supernatural character can in no wise be ascribed to the trance ; its divine origin is not at all self-evident, — phenomena of that nature were far from uncommon in ancient times and in the Middle Ages, as it occurs even at the present day. It is true that for a long time people had no hesitation in ascribing them to super- natural influence. They seemed so singular and extraordinary that this explanation forced itself quite naturally on men's minds. What could not be derived from God was therefore regarded as a display of the power of the devil. But we now no longer occupy that standpoint. Ecstasy is now accurately studied, compared with other affections allied to it, and is explained from the human organism itself, specifically from the nervous system. It may be — on that point I determine nothing at present— that the trances of the Israelitish prophets were of a nature altogether different ; but that must be proved separately, for ecstasy in itself is no super- natural phenomenon. It does not therefore advance us a step in determining the origin of Old Testament prophecy." — Kuenen's Prophets and Prophecij in Israel, p. 80, London 1871. See also Ladd, Doctnne of Sacred Scripture^ ii. p. 440 seq. 1883. HEBEEW PROPHECY. 11 of religion "have "been sinritnally enligMemed to discern truths of a higher order than their fellows and to experience emotions of a deeper and more absorbing intensity. They have wondrous powers of insight and forecast. TJiey read and interpret character and affairs. They are the masters of the past and the present, and they point the way con- fidently into the future. Such prophets of a higher grade exist among the various religions of the world. Who can say that they are mere deceivers or enthusiasts ? "Who can deny that some of them at least may have been guided by the divine Spirit in the ordinary influences of the divine Providence in their spiritual reflections and activities while they have been feeling after God ? If the Hebrew prophets were not only for Israel alone, but also in the end for the entire world, was there not a preparation needed by the other nations of the world to receive the prophecy of the Bible at the proper time ; and how could that preparation be so well accomplished as by prophetic voices in the midst of the other religions ? Looking at these widespread phenomena of prophecy, we find that Hebrew prophecy exhibits similar pheno- mena. These are then the physical and psychological conditions of all prophecy, and are not peculiar features of Hebrew prophecy.^ Starting from these phases of prophecy which are common to the Hebrews and other nations, two con- * Cicero already discriminated the higher order of prophecy from the lesser, " Duo genera divinationum esse dixerunt, unum quod particeps esset artis, alterum quod arte careret. Est enim ars in iis, qui novas res conjectura consequuntur, veteres observatione didi- cerunt. Carent autem arte ii, qui non ratione aut conjectura, observatis aut notatis signis, sed concitatione quadam animi aut soluto liberoque motu futura prsesentiunt, quod et somniantibus persrepe contingit et non nunquam vaticinantibus per furorem." — Cicero, de dvoin. i. 18. 12 MESSIANIC PROPHECY. trasted positions are taken and erroneous theories are constructed hj laying an undue emphasis upon one phase or another. m. THE MOXTANISTIC THEOEY OF HEBREW PROPHECY. § 7. The Montanistic theory represents tlu prophets as passive instruments of the divine Spirit. The ecstatic state with its vision is the essential feature of prophecy. The pro'phet sees or hears tlie revelation as something external to himself and declares it is an eccternal thing. He is taken possession of hy the divine Spirit y so that his speech and writing are nx) longer his own, hut the Sjjirifs, using him as an instrument. It should not be denied that this phase of prophecy does occur in the Bible. The hand of Jahveh is laid upon such men as Gideon, Jephtha and Samson, making them mere instruments or channels of divine influence. The prophetic mania comes upon a man like Saul. There is a dreaming of dreams by Pharaoh and Xebuchadnezzar ; there is a seeing of visions by Balaam, and the hearing of a divine voice as by the child Samuel; and we find instruments of the most passive kind in the serpent of Eden and the ass of Balaam. But these are all of the lower phases of prophecy where the divine Spirit deals with incapable instruments ; rude men, heathen kings, coarser spirits, untutored boys, who had little suscepti- biUty for communion with God, and with dumb beasts. It is not the appropriate method for spiritual and devout souls. Balaam receives revelations in dreams. His ecstatic state is vividly described. He lies prostrate with closed eyes, seeing a ^dsion and hearing words, which he is con- strained to utter acrainst his will : o HEBREW PROPHECY. 13 " Utterance of Balaam son of Beor, Utterance of the man with closed eyes, Utterance of the one hearing the sayings of '-£7, And knowing the knowledge of 'ElyoUy Who sees the vision of Shadday^ Lying prostrate and with eyes opened." ^ But Moses the prophet of Jahveh is vastly higher than this. God does not speak to him in visions, dreams, or riddles, but face to face, shows him His form, and grants him His communion. " If one is to be your prophet, I, Jahveh, in the vision make myself known to him ; In a dream I speak with him. Not so my servant Moses, With all my house he is entrusted, Mouth to mouth I speak with him, In an appearance without riddles ; 2 And the form of Jahveh he beholds. Why then do ye not fear To speak against my servant Moses ? " * Moses is the model of all subsequent prophecy. The prophet who is to give divine instruction to Israel is like him.* Hebrew prophecy is ordinarily of the highest phase. It has its psychological basis in what we observe in the highest order of prophets among the heathen. Those isolated cases on which the modern Montanists 1 Num. xxiv. 15, 16. We give the Hebrew divine names in transliteration in order to show the differences which are obscured by translation. ^^, ^El, is the Strong. By rendering God the difFer- ence between it and DTl^S is obscured. jV^y, ' Ely on, is an archaic intensive plural form with the meaning Most High. ntJ^, Shadday, has the meaning Almighty. 2 The Massoretic text reads n^iroi, and so does the Vulgate, but the Vulgate renders et palam. The Samaritan codex and the LXX. read ni^"i?D3, and the LXX. renders h si'hi, which is better suited to the context and the paralleliism. 8 Num. xii. 6-8. This little piece is poetry, and we present it in the lines of parallelism. * Deut. xviii. 18. 14 MESSIANIC PKOPIIECY. build their theory amount to nothing more than a lower order of a more general class. They give at best a mechanical, a magical sort of prophecy. The great mass of Hebrew prophecy — compared with which the cases referred to are trifling in number — exhibits a revelation of a vastly higher character. It is not external, mechani- cal, or magical, but internal, spiritual and intelligent. Hebrew prophecy is through the enlightenment of the mind of the prophet, the stimulation of his moral nature, the constraining of his will, under the most sublime motives, the assurance of his soul that he is in possession of divine truth, and that he is commissioned to declare it.^ The most primitive form of prophecy among the Hebrews was doubtless of the lowest phases, external revelations, through dreams or in ecstatic visions. From this point of view the prophet was in the most ancient times called a seer, and his prophecy a vision^ — not seen ^ See Eiehm, Messianische Weissagu7ig, 2 Aufl. p. 21 seq., Gotha 1885 ; Messianic Prophecy, p. 20, Edin. 1876. Hengstenberg in modern times laid great stress upon the organ of sight in the ecstiitic state of Biblical prophecy. Few modern scholars have been able to follow him. In more recent times Konig has emphasized the organ of hearing and the divine communication through words and speech. It is quite evident that divine communications are more frequent, in the Old Testament representations, to the ear than to the eye. Sometimes both organs are open to divine revelation. But it seems to us that Konig has failed in his emphasis upon hearing, no less than Hengstenberg in his emphasis upon seeing. The criti- cism of Eiehm upon his theory is quite just. It is sufficient that we recognise the divine origin of the communication as external to the soul of man. There are no sufficient reasons for extending this external origin to the form and the mode of the communication! The stimulation of the higher nature of man by a divine impulse is all that can be proven with reference to the mass of Hebrew prophecy. The mode of the stimulation seems to be ordinarily within the man, when his powers are active and not passive, when the divine ideal sjjrings up in the forms of the i)rophet'3 own think- ing and expression. See Riehm in I.e. p. 22 seq., and Konig in I.e. ii. pp. 142 seq., 360 seq. ^ nsh = seer, and its synonymous nm, gazer, beholder. That which is seen is also called r\\iC\\:i or HTriD or pM = vision. There HEBREW PROPHECY. 15 indeed with the physical eyes, for these were closed in slumber or in unconsciousness to the external world — but seen by the inner eye. But even here in this lowest sphere of Hebrew prophecy, where the prophet was merely passive and the vision or dream an object of in- ternal sight, there is the presence of God in a distinguished manner, as in the theophanies of the heavenly ladder in Jacob's dream, the fiery furnace in Abraham's vision, and the cherubic chariot in the vision of Ezekiel.^ There is also an interpreting voice which guides the inner eye to see and to understand what it could not otherwise observe. For unless the dream and the vision of Hebrew prophecy were something more than mere dream or vision, unless they have with them the peculiar marks of the Deity, we could not accept them as divine. It is in these lower grades of prophecy that we find the specific features of Hebrew prophecy as well as in the higher. But the later, higher and more common name of the Hebrew prophet is Nabi,'^ which means speaker, or preacher. From this point of view the prophetic word is called suggestion, communication, or utterance of is no such distinction between these terms as Konig finds {Ofen- harungshegriff, ii. p. 29 seq., Leipzig 1882. See Kiehm in I.e. p. 45). 1 Gen. xxviii. 12 seq. ; Gen. xv. 12 seq. ; Ezek. i. ^ S^D3 is an intransitive noun from the stem 5^33. It is not found in the active or passive species, but only in the reflexive, either the Niphal or Hithpael. It is kindred with 21^, which is used of the coming forth of fruit. So in Prov. x. 31, "The mouth of the righteous putteth forth wisdom." It is hke the Arabic naha)a = to riae up, become audible, to proclaim, and the Assyrian nabit = to call, proclaim, name. ^5''3D is therefore the spokesman, preacher. This is essentially the view of most recent interpreters, Ewald, Fleischer, Delitzsch, Konig, Miilau, and Volck, et al. Kuenen objects that the Arabic verb is more likely a denominative, and that the Arabic noun was derived from the Hebrew, and that furthermore the verb is used in Hebrew only in the reflexive species {Prophets^ p. 42). But this does not explain the Assyrian verb, and the reflexive species properly mean to act as spokesman or preacher. Kuenen agrees with Tholuck, Gesenius, et al., that ^^33 is a passive noun, from J533, kindred with j;3j = to boil up, pour forth, and that 16 MESSIAXIC PROPHECY. God ; or " word of Jahveh ; " ^ or message,^ which the prophet was to lift up in song or preaching. So from this higher point of view the prophet is called servant of God, involving a close relationship to the Deity as His own servant — a man of God, and also a man of the Spirit.^ Indeed, so close is the intimacy between Jahveh and His prophets that " Surely 'Adonay Jahveh doeth nothing, Unless he hath revealed his secret plan to his servants the prophets. Hath a lion roared, who will not hear ? Hath 'Adonay Jahveh spoken, who will not prophesy ? " * These prophets are therefore like Moses, in close union and constant communion with their God. They ordinarily depend upon a subjective and internal communication tlirough the stimulation of their higher nature to per- ception, conception, comprehension and expressive utter- the prophet is one who is caused to boil over with the divine word. They refer to l^m in Ps. xlv. 2 for the idea. Hupfeld, Eiehm, Schultz, et al., compare ii2: with DX3, and take them both as passive forms with kindred meaning. But most scholars regard DNJ as meaning, breathe, whisper. It is found in the verbal form only in Jer. xxiii. 31. It is elsewhere used as a passive part, construct before God or the prophet, or a personification of evil (Ps. xxxv. 12). It seems to us that the stems are similar, and they must have synony- mous meaning. Namu is found in late Babylonian with the meaning proclaim. We prefer to regard fc^u: as preacher and Dx: as utterance. ^ Twrs"^ i:n is used but once in the Pentateuch, in Gen. xv. 1, where it differs from the mode of revelation in the context, and seems to be the generaHzation of a later editor. It is a frequent term in the prophets, ^ NJ^'D is a noun formed by D from ^^y^ = to lift up. It is the message that the prophet lifts up in song or preaching. It is usually found in connection with predictions of judgment or warnings, and is commonly rendered burden. ^ nnn CJ'"'X (Hos. ix. 7) indicates that the prophet is a man acting with divine authority and under the influence of the divine Spirit. * Amos iii. 7, 8. '•jnx, ^Adonay, the Lord. HEBREW PROPHECY. 17 ance of the mysterious counsels of divine revelation, by the voice and the pen.-^ IV. THE NATURALISTIC THEORY OF PROPHECY. § 8. The naturalistic theory starts from the highest 'phase of prophecy which exists among the heathen. It brings into view the wondrous insight and foresight of men of genius. It points to the great religious teachers of the world outside of the Hebrew nation. It claims that the Hebrew prophets were men of the same kind, though of a higher and nobler grade, in the measure that their religious conceptions were higher and nobler. We admit that the productions of human genius and the religious teachings of the prophets of the religions of the world may be explained sufficiently by the ordinary operations of divine providence upon the souls of men, without extraordinary divine influence. But we claim that Hebrew prophecy cannot be explained in tliis way. We recognise common features in Hebrew prophecy and other prophecy so far as these have been traced. But after all that is common has been eliminated, that which is peculiar to Hebrew prophecy is of such a character as to prove its divine origin and guidance. A careful discrimination of the elements found in the prophecy of all other religions and in the Hebrew religion, and the comparison of the results, brings the vastly higher and grander features of Hebrew prophecy ^ See DeHtzsch, Messianic Prophecies, p. 17, Edinburgh 1880, who aptly cites Chrysostom Horn. xxix. i?i ep. ad corinthios: "This is the peculiarity of the mantis ; to be beside oneself, to suffer constraint, to be struck, to be stretched, to be dragged like a mad- man. The prophet, however, is not so, but he speaks everything with calm understanding and with sound self-possession, and know- ing what he proclaims, so that before the result we can even from these things distinguish between the mantis and the proi)het." 18 MESSIANIC PKOPHECY. to scientific statement and invincible position.^ This will be manifest both in the differences in form and the differences in content, and above all in the entire con- formity to truth and fact, in such sublime heights of conception and such vast reaches of comprehension, that it transcends the powers of hmnan origination and guid- ance, and compels resort to the divine mind and the divine power to explain its origin and its development into such a sublime organism. V. THE DISTINGUISHING FEATUEES OF HEBEEW PEOPHECY. § 9. The prophet of Jahvch is personally called and endoiued hy Jahveh with the prophetic spirit. He speaks in the name of Jahveh and in his name alone. He is one of a series of prophets who guide in ths develo2Jment of the Heh'ew religion. He a.hsorhs and reproduces previous ^prophecy. He transmits prophecy with confidence to his successors. Hehrcw prophecy is an organism of redemption. We have seen that Hebrew prophecy has the same three phases that are found in all great religions, but that it cannot be explained by theories which build on any of these phases. It claims to be a divine revelation, resting upon higher and more substantial grounds than these. Indeed we not only have to distinguish between Hebrew prophecy and aU other prophecy ; but in Hebrew prophecy itself it is necessary to eliminate the genuine from the spurious : for there are those who speak in the name of Jahveh and are prophets of lies.^ There are those who mistake their conceits and fancies for divine communica- 1 Miiller, Science of Religion, p. 37, 1873, "I make no secret that true Christianity, I mean the rehgion of Christ, seems to me to become more and more exalted the more we know and the more we appreciate the treasures of truth hidden in the despised religions of the world." 2 Jer. xxiii. I HEBREW PROPHECY. 19 tions. There are those who are deceived by lying spirits/ There are professional prophets in Israel who prophesy for gain and for political influence. The faithful prophet of Jahveh has to contend against these false prophets of Jahveh as well as against the prophets of Baal. He does it through the divine assurance that he is in possession of the truth of God, and that he is called to proclaim it. For the true prophet of Jahveh differs from other prophets not in those phases of human experience and expression which are essential to prophecy and common to mankind, but as the Hebrew religion differs from all other religions. For an extraordinary divine influence which is called supernatural, to distinguish it from the ordinary influences of the divine Providence which are called natural, used the psychological and physical con- ditions of human nature to determine through them that religion and so that prophecy in its origin and through its organic development towards the accomphshment of a divine plan of redemption.^ Without denying to other religions an occasional divine influence in their prophecy, springing from the ordinary working of the divine Providence in the affairs of man- kind, without excluding altogether the prophecy of the great religions of the earth from occasional extraordinary divine influences such as are called supernatural, we claim that these extraordinary divine influences give Hebrew prophecy its characteristic features ; for we find them extending through a long period of historical development, increasing in intensity, complexity and comprehensiveness as they accumulate upon one another, combining so as to constitute Hebrew prophecy an organic whole, a sublime ideal of redemption. 1 2 Chron. xviii. 2 Simon, The Bible an Outgrowth of Theocratic Life^ chap. viii. Edin. 1886. 20 MESSIANIC PROPHECY. VI. THE PEOPHETIC CALL AND ENDOWMENT. § 10. Hebrcio jpro];)hecy originates in a personal revela- tion of God to man in tlieophany. It is comnmmicated to successive prophets hy the influence of the Spirit of God. The divine Sjnrit assures the prophet of his possession of the truth of God and of his commission to declare it ; endows him vjith the gifts and spiritual energy to proclaim it without fear or favour, and despite every obstacle ; guides him in the fomii of its delivery, and directs him to give it its appropriate place in the prophetic system. The Hebrew religion is a religion of union and com- munion with God, a living, growing, everlasting religion. The Hebrew prophets present us with an immortal religion. They derive it by direct communication with the ever-living God. It is the theophanic manifestation of God in forms of time and space and the sphere of physical nature, to call and endow the master spirits of Hebrew prophecy, that constitute one of its most dis- tinctive features. Hebrew prophecy as Hebrew miracle- working springs from theophanies. These were the sources of every new advance. They constitute a series leading on to the incarnation as their culmination. They were the di\Tne seals to the roll of Hebrew prophecy, sealing every new page with an objective divine verifica- tion and authentication. They bind the prophets into an organic whole. They come in the great crisis of the development of prophecy, and shed their glorious light over the prophecies that precede and those that follow. We have not only therefore the calling and endowment of particular prophets by these theophanies, but the calling and the endowment of prophetic chiefs to originate and perpetuate a succession of prophets with an organic system of prophecy.'^ ^ " The case admits of no doubt — the canonical prophets are mutually allied and are closely connected with one another. The HEBREW PEOPHECY. 21 We do not find these theophanies in connection with every prophet, but only with the greatest prophets, the reformers of their age. It is possible that other prophets were also called by theophanies which they have not described to us. But this is improbable. It was indeed unnecessary. Theophanies are to initiate religious move- ments and mark the stages of their development, but are not the constant feature of prophecy. Ordinarily Hebrew prophecy comes from prophets who have the internal subjective assurance of the truth of God and their com- mission to declare it. But in all cases of objective as well as subjective assurance the prophet's powers are taxed to the utmost to give expression, in the human forms of his own nature and surroundings, to the divine ideas that have taken possession of him. In order to explain this internal communication we would refer to the witness of the Holy Spirit giving the Christian assurance of salvation, the assurance of sonship to God, and the gratification of knowing that prayer is accepted and answered. This testimony of the Spirit is a divine assurance imparted by a supernatural energy to the believer's soul.^ The difference in the operation of the Holy Spirit in these cases is not in mode. The divine energy is the same — the Spirit of God. The subjects of the influence are the same — pious men. The same supernatural impartation of the divine Spirit to • the human spirit is made in all these cases. The difference consists in the one may stand more by himself, the other may be more dependent upon his predecessors ; collectively they all form, as it were, one school, or they may be likened to the links of one chain." — Kuenen, Prophets^ p. 74. 1 See Oehler, Theology of the Old Test. ii. p. 336 seq., Edin. 1883, and Eiehm in I.e. p. 35 seq. The polemic of Konig (in I.e. ii. p. 194 seq.) against this position seems to us without force. See also Ladd, Doctrine of Sacred Scripture., ii. p, 369 seq., and Presbyterian Review., v. p. 384. 22 MESSIANIC PROPHECY. contents of this influence — and in the measure of the energy. The contents in the other cases mentioned are : sense of sonship, of the love and favour of a heavenly Father, of communion with Him, of conformity to His will, of recei\"ing the benefits desired in prayer. The contents of the influence that inspires the prophet are : the revelation of truth in its relation to the particular prophet and in its relation to the organism of prophecy, and the obligation to declare that truth in the form in which it is conveyed, and to give it its place in the prophetic system. There is also a difference in the extent and degree of the energy, for the prophet is empowered to deliver the truth of God without fear or favour despite obstacles and resistance of every kind. The intensity of this energy differs greatly in different prophets. In Moses and Elijah, in Isaiah, Jeremiah and Ezekiel, the heroes of prophecy, who were called in theophanies, it was so intense as to enable them to stand alone with God against their own nation and the world, and to overcome by its divine energy all opposing forces and circumstances. And yet never was the individuality of these heroes of prophecy so marked, never their humanity more apparent, never the peculiar features of their own character so distinct, as in those great crises when the fires of God within them were burning with the most intense light and heat. The divine imparted its energy to the human and merged its objectivity in the subjectivity of the prophet, in this infallible assurance of having and holding and declaring the in\'incible truth of God. VII. THE TEST OF PROPHECY. § 11. The infallible test of iJie genuine prophecy of Jahveh is its entire conformity to truth and fact. HEBREW PROPHECY. 23 The infallible assurance of the soul of the prophet may be difficult to distinguish from the false assurance of enthusiasts and the confident self-assertion of prophets of lies, and yet here is the place where the distinction must be made. The possibility, yes, the probability of mistakes is recognized in the Scriptures and provided for in the warning of Moses. " For these nations, which thou art about to dispossess, are accus- tomed to hearken unto sorcerers and unto diviners ; but as for thee, Jahveh thy God hath not suffered thee so to do. A prophet from thy midst, of thy brethren, like me, will Jahveh thy God raise up unto thee ; unto him shall ye hearken ; according to all that thou didst ask from Jahveh thy God in Horeb, in the day of the assembly, saying, ' I cannot again hear the voice of Jahveh my God, and this great fire I cannot see any more, lest I die.' And Jahveh said unto me, ' They have done well in what they have spoken. A jjrophet will I raise up for them from the midst of their brethren, like thee, and will give my words in his mouth, and he will speak unto them all that I charge him. And it will come to pass, that whosoever will not hearken unto my words which he will speak in my name, I will require it of him. Only the prophet who shall presume to speak a thing in my name, which I have not charged him to speak, and who shall speak in the name of other gods, that prophet shall die. And if thou say in thy heart. How can we know the thing which Jahveh hath not spoken 1 What the prophet speaketh in the name of Jahveh, and the thing transpire not and come not, that is the thing which Jahveh hath not spoken. In presumption the prophet hath spoken. Thou shalt not be afraid of him.' " ^ Here then is a divine test of prophecy given at the very foundation of the Hebrew system. Not the signs and wonders and external forms of prophecy are to be the test, for as Jesus said, " There will arise false Messiahs and false prophets, and will show great signs and wonders : insomuch that if possible they will deceive the very elect," ^ but the internal character, the 1 Deut. xviii. 14-22. ^ Matt. xxiv. 24. 24 MESSIANIC PROPHECY. essence of the prophecy, whether it be in the name of Jahveh, whether it be true and real, whether it be to the honour of God, whether it conform with the prophetic system. This is the absolute test to which every Hebrew prophet submits, and which every pious man is bound to apply. This test of divine truth gives a mutual obliga- tion. It gives a divine sanction to the prophet himself to declare the truth of God, and it also gives the most sacred obligation to the people to yield obedience to the word of trutL Any such slavish adhesion to a priori claims as the scholastic theory requires is unscriptural and it is immoral. It is the sign - seeking condemned by our Saviour as so characteristic of the Pharisees of his time. Every divine revelation demands the most searching criticism and inquiry as to its truth. The more earnest and searching the inquiry, the more complete will be the mastery that the divine truth will gain over the soul, and the more sincere and faithful wiU be the adhesion to it. VIII. THE DEVELOPI^IENT OF PEOPHECY. § 12. Proiolucy first ai^jgcars as an occasional function of the antediluvians and 'patriarchs. Moses was the first ofiicial prophet, and the model of all that followed. Samuel was the first to make it a distinct office and to found propheticcd schools. The prophets are the counsellors of the monarcJis and the reformers of the nation, and as such reach a sublime height in Nathan, Elijah and Elisha, They instruct the nation in its history and its covenants, its institutions and its worship, and give birth to schools of p)salmody and ivisdom. Prophecy attains its height in a se7'ies of prophets who deliver oral prophecies as the divinely appointed oiational reformers, and subsequently record their HEBREW PROPHECY. 25 prophecies as the several successive sections of an organic system of divine revelation to manJdnd. Prophecy was first developed into an office in Moses, who became the model of all subsequent Hebrew prophets. Prior to Moses the prophetic function is dis- played at times in Enoch and Noah, in Abraham and Jacob, but it is sporadic, Moses predicts a prophet like himself over against the sorcerers and diviners of the Canaanites, but knows nothing of an order or succession of prophets. Prophecy remains sporadic until Samuel, who is called to the office of prophet, and who like Moses at first combines the prophetic and regal functions, but after the resignation of his civil authority establishes the prophetic office apart by itself, and becomes the founder of prophetical schools. With Samuel the prophetic office takes its place as an independent office alongside of the royal and priestly orders, and enters upon centuries of development. The prophets at first appear like Samuel with some of the functions of the judges. They suddenly appear at the court of the king or before a national assembly. They execute their commission of exhortation, promise or warning, and disappear. Their religious instruction has a political cast. The schools of the prophets are frequently mentioned in the historical books at various places and in considerable numbers. They seem to have been engaged in the study of the instruction of Jahveh and in His worship with songs and dances. To them we may attri- bute the earlier historical poems and poetic narratives embedded in the historical books. They were being pre- pared through many generations from Samuel to Joash for the peculiar work the prophetic order was ordained to do. They gave birth to the schools of psalmody and the schools of wisdom, and prepared the way for the greatest prophets. They combined the history and the poetry, the 26 MESSIANIC PROPHECY. laws and the wisdom, to reproduce them at the appointed time in higher and grander forms. After the division of the kingdom it was in the northern reahn that the prophetic activity had the fullest development. This was in order to lead Israel through the severe crises in her history. And thus the prophetic order rises rapidly to a sublime elevation and grandeur in Elijah and Elisha as they appear endowed with miraculous power, and boldly confront kings and princes as if they would single-handed turn the heart of princes and bend the nation to the will of Jahveh. But these functions of the prophetic office, making history as great religious heroes, and recording the history of redemption with its covenants and institutions, were preparatory to the highest function of giving the divine revelation in historical development and in a living, growing and ever consolidating organism. Combining the sum-total of the divine revelation of the patriarchs and judges, and especially of Abraham and Moses and of Samuel, they rolled it along with immense and ever increasing weight, power and sublimity, hasting on to the latter days. The prophets as an order of preachers and teachers constitute a grand stairway, advancing prophet after prophet in linked succession until the organism of prophecy is completed and the revelation of the Messiah is at hand. As the prophetic office was rising to its highest functions, it developed into four schools or tendencies, three of which, the school of psalmody, the school of wisdom, and the school of the ritual, moved in the ordinary planes of prophecy, while the proplictic function of the schools of the prophets moving in narrower lines rose to its tower- ing heights of guiding the nation through the perplexities of the present, towards a realization of the grander ideals of the future. The whole Old Testament is prophecy HEBREW PROPHECY. 27 in the broader sense of the term, and yet when we distinguish the law from prophecy we are halting on the threshold of a still more thorough discrimination which eliminates from prophecy in general, the Law and the Wisdom and the Psalter, in order to rise at once to a conception of prophecy which is at the same time narrower and higher. For the Hebrew prophets grasp the great essential principles of the Hebrew religion. They trace them in their most characteristic features in historical development. They apprehend the exact issues of their own times. They realize the eternal ideals of the prophetic system. They raise these on the banners of reform. The Hebrew prophets are thus essentially a series of reformers. Their office is to hold up the ideal of reform and urge to its realization. They are the true successors of Moses — they lead on to Christ. They marshal the religious forces of Israel, and from age to age advance the lines of the faithful in closer con- formity to the divine ideal, which lies at the basis of the Hebrew religion, and which dominates its history. This, then, is the great feature of Hebrew prophecy, its grand march forward in spite of every obstacle from triumph to triumph. The author of the Epistle to the Hebrews ^ begins the roll-call of the heroes, but stops almost at the beginning for want of time and space to complete them. No such names are to be found in the history of any other nation, — or in the history of all the other religions combined, — heroes of battles the most sublime the world has ever seen ; battles not for the rehgion of Israel alone, but for the religious progress of humanity, for the ever- lasting religion of mankind. 1 Heb. xi. 28 MESSIiVNIC PEOPHECY. IX. THE PPvOPHETIC IDEAL. § 13. Hchrevj jjro'ijliccy comhines in a remarkable, manner the real and tJie ideal. If the real is in exact con- formity to truth, still more is the ideal a mirror of the divine mind. The ideal of Hebrew 'prophecy is the regulative factor of the entire Old Covenant revelation. It is at once the goal and the impulse of the entire historical develop- ment. It comprehends the essential principles of religion^ doctrine and morals. It comhines the circumstantial and the variahle with the essential and invariable to be ulti- mately attained by all. Above all, it is an ideal of the complete redemp)tion of mankind. In the marvellous progress of Hebrew prophecy the most significant factor is the combination of the real and the ideal. In the midst of the circumstantial and the variable, adapted to particular persons and occasions, the determining influence is ever the essential ideal which abides, amidst all the vast variety and intricate complexity of detail, the permanent, the everlasting and the ultimate — not a stereotyped ideal in forms to which everything must be conformed, but a living ideal adapting itself with ease and grace to every circumstance and every occasion and every person, and yet so exalted above the temporal and the local and the purely formal, that these are incapable of limiting its growth or checking its pro- gress. It is indeed a living, an eternal, an absolute, an infinite ideal — what else can it be than the product of the di\T[ne mind ? This ideal is readily discernible throughout Hebrew prophecy. We see it not only in the ten commandments, the quintessence of Mosaism, but it pervades the entire legislation and all tlie codes, as the regulative element giving shape and organization to the whole. It is this ideal that makes the Psalter the psalm book of the uni- HEBEEW PROPHECY. 29 versal Church, that gives the Wisdom literature its ethical influence upon all times and lands, that makes Hebrew history the mirror of humanity, that constitutes the Hebrew prophets the teachers of the world. Call this ideal what we please, supernatural or natural, it matters not. It is higher and grander than any other natural known to man ; it is so much higher and grander that it separates Hebrew prophecy from all other pro- phecy. It gives it a unique position and importance. It is an ideal ever realizing itself, and yet as high above reality as ever. If it be not divine in origin and direc- tion, whence did it originate ? It lifts us to the higher powers — it has the attributes of the Infinite One. It is divine revelation. If we look at the doctrines of the Hebrew prophets and compare them with the doctrines of other prophets, the divine features of these doctrines are manifest. Thus the doctrine of the unity and personality of God, as the God of creation and of redemption, was gTandly conceived and stated in uniform and ever advancing clearness and consistency by the Hebrew prophets alone. Compare with this idea of God, the Polytheism, Pantheism, and Deism of other religions, and we are forced to the inquiry, whence could this idea have come save from God Himself ? We do not claim that such an idea could not be evolved by the human mind. But, in fact, such an idea has not been evolved in any other religion. Such an idea is not readily accepted by those who are not in sympathy with the Christian religion. The human mind drifts to Pan- theism or Deism rather than to the Biblical doctrine of God. It seems impossible truly to apprehend the Biblical doctrine of God save by personal union with God through the grace which the Bible itself offers. The union of the finite with the infinite can be effected only by the Infinite; the personal knowledge of the Infinite can be afforded 30 MESSIANIC PEOPHECT. only by the advent of the Infinite Himself. The human soul is capable of tliis divine knowledge, and Hebrew prophecy gives the divine knowledge that satisfies the soul. This is an evidence that that prophecy has a divine source. The Hebrew doctrine of man is no less divine. The unity of the race is a unique conception of the Bible. It is above the prejudices of the other religions against other races. The Hebrew prophets were Hebrew patriots, but their prophecies grasped humanity and embraced the world. This original unity of mankind lost by sin is to be restored by grace, and the Hebrew doctrine of the ideal man — holy and perfect as God is holy and perfect — is so grand and inspiring that the philosophy and theology of our times has as yet failed to apprehend it. "Wliere do we find such an intense and realistic conception of sin ? How dark and dread the representation, and yet how true to fact and human consciousness ! The Hebrew prophets were faithful men — they saw human sin through divine eyes, and they portrayed it in its guilty colours. The natural man was incapable of such true and noble anthropology without divine instruction. But prophetic theology culminates in its doctrine of redemption. This is the golden thread of Hebrew history and of the Hebrew religion. The union of God and man by redemption, that is the noble ideal that inspires Hebrew prophecy throughout : steadily and unfalteringly the prophets lead the nation to the apprehension and realization of that ideal. It has none of that miserable pessimism that characterizes so many of the lower religions and even the lower philosophies of our day. It has none of that spurious optimism which the human reason yearns for and pantheistic systems present. It represents the good and the evil in everlasting conflict ; but this conflict is a conflict which is a development of HEBKEW^. PROPHECY. 3 1 redemption into higher stages and grander achievements. The doctrine of redemption given by the Hebrew prophets is a divine idea, and cannot be explained as an evolution of human hopes and fears and aspirations. The theology of the Hebrew prophets throughout is such a wondrous combination of reality and truth, of the temporal and the eternal, the actual and the ideal, that it evinces the conception of a mind that grasps the ages in faithful and vivid realization, and that has the power of representing that conception in terms that stand the test of time and circumstance. The doctrines of the Hebrew prophets transcend the powers of human appre- hension and conception, and like the sublime ideas of the reason — form and time and space — circumscribe human knowledge, and invoke the Deity to explain them as conceptions of the divine mind. In the sphere of doctrine the ideal is most easily detected and presented. It is in the sphere of religion and of morals that Hebrew prophecy is ordinarily attacked. But it is just in these departments where the necessity of adaptation to time and place and circumstance is most apparent. No prophecy could be true prophecy that would not meet the practical issues of life. Hebrew prophecy in its historic development adapts itself to the needs of the day and the person and the affair. Hence we must eliminate the circumstantial and the variable from the essential and the permament in these depart- ments. But it is this very power of adaptation that proves the original vitality and wondrous efficacy of the Hebrew religion and the prophetic ethics. We are not dismayed at the lowest stages of religion when we see it advancing through the centuries to higher and higher stages towards the realization of a perfect ideal. We are not surprised at a low grade of morals tolerated in a rude and untutored people, when we see that grade rising 32 MESSIANIC PROPHECY. higher and higher in the divine discipline of a nation. The imperfection and the grossness of the earlier Hebrew religion, and the morals of the earlier stages of Hebrew prophecy, are patent to all, but these do not disprove the divinity of the grand religious and ethical ideals of I)rophecy. There is this strife between the divine ideal and the historical reality which makes the history of Israel seem like a series of apostasies, and which has so coloured the stream with sin and e\il that theologians have been too often forgetful that it is in fact a stream ever flowing onward. The divine ideals are indeed ever constraining the people of Israel to conformity with them ; and the prophets are the standard-bearers in this religious and ethical progress of the nation. These ideal elements are essential to the system of Hebrew prophecy, they are in religion and in morals the constitutive parts — they are the primitive, the permanent, the advancing, yes, the ultimate and eternal elements. They are abso- lutely true and everlastingly real. They cannot be expjlained save by a conjunction of di\dne forces with human agencies. They involve a union of God and man in the prophetic heroes of redemption. These phenomena, these essential features of the Hebrew prophecy, imply an extraordinary divine influ- ence, continued from age to age, giving unity to the prophecy of a great number of different prophets. Hebrew prophecy presents us a system of instruction which cannot be explained from the reflections of the human mind. It gives us a view of redemption as the final goal of the world's history, which is heaven-born, and not a human invention. It accomplishes a work in advancing the redemption that overcomes all human resistance as by a divine force. Its holy character — its spotless purity — its absolute truth — its implicit confidence in the ultimate accomplishment of the most beautiful. HEBREW PROPHECY. 33 elevating and sublime hopes — all combine in showing that one supreme, superhuman energy inspired it all. Demanding the most searching criticism from the start, it has endured that criticism in all ages — such a criti- cism as no other prophecy has been able to endure — such as has, in fact, beaten into ruins all other prophecy. A still more searching criticism it is passing through to- day, that abiding the test, its truth and reality may conquer and sway mankind. The Hebrew prophets therefore were prophets not merely in the sense of the oracles and sibyls and prophets of other religions, but in that holy men of God spake as they were moved by the Holy Spirit of Jahveh. CHAPTER n. PREDICTIVE PROPHECY. § 14. Prediction is a common feature of the religions of mankind, hut it is com'paratively a small section of Hebrew ])rojfiiecy. Hebrew prediction gains its vast significance from its content, the central nucleus of the 2)rophetic ideal, the comjMion of redem-ption through the Messiah. It is a common habit so to identify prophecy with prediction tliat the terms to many minds become practi- cally identical. But prophecy is properly far more extensive. Prediction constitutes but one feature of genuine prophecy, and that not the common, but the extraordinary feature. It is only one section, and that the smallest, of the range of prophetic instruction. It is a weakness rather than an excellence to exalt the predictive element as such. It is one of the evil fruits of an unwholesome apologetic that has been transmitted to us from the previous century, when there was a greedy grasping after anything and everything in. the form of prediction that might in any way serve to exalt the super- natural character of the Bible.^ Prediction is not a 1 " We can liere proceed on an observation which has akeady forced itself upon us, while we were discussing the prophecies regarding the judgment upon Israel. To the question, ' fulfilled or not fulfilled,' we received from time to time no clear or unambiguous answer. Nay, what is of greater significance, more than one para- graph of the prophetical writings, which yet treats of the future, scarcely admits of being regarded as prediction. This would be 34 PREDICTIVE PEOPHECY. 35 peculiar feature of Hebrew prophecy. It is found in other domains than religion, and occurs in all religions. The human mind is endowed with certain faculties which may be trained to prediction. A statesman who under- stands the constitutional history of his country, and is master of the political forces at work in the present, may be able to predict the combinations that these will assume, and their issues in the future. A theologian may be able to discern the coming conflicts in the Church and predict in a measure the results. The laws that govern human action are as exact and certain in their operation as the laws of the physical universe. It only needs a knowledge sufficiently extensive, an insight suffi- ciently profound, a foresight sufficiently clear, to predict the future of an individual, a family, or a nation. There is moreover among men an anxiety respecting the future which is so widespread as to be natural. And when the issue of present events and present action is important, it is natural, and it is common to seek the counsel of the higher powers. A Christian under such circumstances resorts to prayer. A heathen under the same circumstances resorts to prophets of various kinds. Prediction as a phase of Hebrew prophecy can only be understood from the general conception of religious instruction. Prediction is the instruction that prophecy gives as it looks forth from the present into the future. Prediction is the most important section of Hebrew wholly inexplicable, if prediction had been the chief object of the prophets. On the other hand, such a phenomenon is in the highest degree natural, if they had another task, a different aim. But such is indeed the case. Their business is not to communicate what shall happen, but to insist upon that which ought to happen. The maintenance of the Jahveh-worship as they comprehended it — • that is what they had in view in the whole course of their activity." — Kuenen's Prop7ie^5 and Prophecy in Israel, p. 344, London 1877. 36 MESSIANIC PROPHECY. prophecy, simply because it presents the essential ideal of the completion of redemption through the Messiah. I. THE SOUECES OF PEEDICTION. § 15. There are many sources of 'p'^^^dictioii to wliicli the heathen resort, such as, necromancy, magic^ divination, augury, astrology, 'palruistry , the use of Teraphim ; all of which are forhidclen in the Old Testament under penalty of death. The only source of prediction to vjhich the Hebrews iccre allowed to resort was the sacred lot, whose decision ivas an expression of the will of Jahveh. Jahveh was the sole source of 'prediction. He gave it and ivithheld it as He pileased. Heathen prediction is almost exclusively of a lower grade than the instruction given in the religious systems of the world. It is of a coarse, sensuous and super- stitious type, and prediction constitutes a much greater proportion of heathen prophecy than it does of Hebrew prophecy. The lowest form is probably necromancy. This was a favourite resort of the relioiion of Baal — consulting^ the dead by means of ' necromancers who were supposed to hold communications with them. We have a curious case of this in the bringing up of Samuel for Saul by the witch of Endor.^ Necromancy is supposed to have been connected with some form of ventriloquism, and to have been usually associated with the assuming of the ecstatic state throui^h the use of druc^s and stimulatinsj exercises. These necromancers are in the Old Testament associated with wizards ^ and magicians ^ who used magic ^ Such a necromancer is called an 31 x, and such a woman is called mistress of an niX- See 1 Sam. xxviii. 2 D^JVIV ^ D^aiJ^DD. PREDICTIVE PROPHECY. 37 arts of various kinds, and are represented ^ as " muttering and chirping," using strange ejaculations and frenzied exhortation and warning. There is another class of these heathen prophets called diviners,^ who seek for direction in the future by the investigation of combinations in various objects of nature. The most common of these is in the use of the entrails of animals and the observation of the flight of birds, the rustling of leaves or the movement of sacred animals or unusual occurrences. This is called augury, and was extensively practised by the Greeks and Komans. Divining by observing the movements of liquids in a vessel or hydromantic is. referred to by Joseph.^ There is a divining by shooting arrows and noting their flight, as in the case of the king of Babylon.^ Teraphim, little images of household deities, are also employed for this purpose.^ There is still another class of heathen prophets called astrologers, who seek in the movements of the stars and the appearances of the heavenly bodies and the phenomena of the skies guidance for the affairs of earth. Then there is the most inveterate of all these forms of heathen prophecy, witchcraft and palmistry. Indeed there are scarcely any phenomena of nature which have not been resorted to by men in their anxiety to determine the future of themselves or others.^ It is characteristic of Biblical prophecy that it de- nounces all these forms of heathen superstition. It puts them under the ban, and regards them as sins against the divine majesty, incurring the penalty of death. The idea at the bottom of all this heathen prediction is that the Deity will manifest His will for the guidance of His 1 Isa. viii. 19. ^ Qsj^Dp. ^ Gen. xliv. 5. * Ezek. xxi. 21-23. * Ezek. xxi. 21 ; Zech. x. 2. « Kiiper, Das FropheterUhum das Alien Bundes^ p. 1 seq., Leipzig 1870. 38 MESSIANIC PROPHECY. worshippers. The custom of the rehgion determines the methods to be used. The only use of natural objects that is lawful in Biblical prophecy is the casting of lots. In the ancient times of Israel we have a number of examples of the use of the sacred lot. It detects the criminal Achan ^ and the innocent Jonathan.^ It divides the Holy Land among the tribes.^ It determines the time and the circumstances of battles. The Urim and Thummim is ordinarily regarded as a sacred lot to be cast by the priest ; but it is properly a sacred stone in the sacred bag^ of the high priest, which assured him that he would have the divine illumination and complete knowledge necessary to enable him to decide on the religious questions submitted to him. It is the priest who is thereby guided to speak the predictive and decisive word. To this Urim and Tlmmitiim of the priest's ephod, Saul and David frequently resort for guidance.^ Saul is represented as in a desperate condition when he is abandoned by God, who answers him " neither by dream nor by Urim nor by prophet."^ He resorts to the un- lawful necromancy only to hear the bitter tragedy that awaited his rebellious career. The prophet Isaiah rebukes Israel for resk)ring to the necromancers rather than to God: " When they say unto you, Seek unto the necromancers and unto the wizards ; — Ye chirpers and niutterers, sliould not a people seek unto their God? On behalf of the living will they seek unto the dead for instruction and for testimony ? " ^ 1 Josh. vii. 14 seq. 2 1 g^j^^ ^j^.^ 43^ ' Josh, xiv.-xix. * D'^Onni Dnixn (Lev. viii. 8). These are abstract intensive plurals, meaning, enlightenment, and completion or perfection. ^ 1 Sam. XXX. 7 seq. « 1 Sam. xxviii. 6. ^ Isa. viii. 19. We disregard the Massoretic accents here, PREDICTIVE PROPHECT. 39 n. DIVINE SOURCE OF HEBREW PREDICTION. § 16. Hebrew prediction uses the several phases of Hebrew prophecy. It is distiiiguished hy its contents from all other prediction. These contents are of such a character as to im'ply divine origination and direction. They are gathered into an organism that presents a divine ideal of redemption which transcends human powers of construction. Hebrew predictive prophecy rises up in sublime majesty above every form of divination, and uses all the varied forms of prophecy, especially the higher, to present its instruction. The prediction is sometimes given in dreams or visions in the ecstatic state. In these cases the future is represented in dramatic forms in the imagina- tion and fancy. The conditions for such prediction are in the constructive power of the imagination, in sleep and the ecstatic state. These creatures of the imagination are ordinarily occasioned by strong recollections, by intense interest in particular things, by great anxiety with reference to certain events. It is not uncommon for the imagination under such circumstances to leap into the future experience by foreboding or ardent anticipation. The imagination may discern the issues in which we are interested more clearly and accurately than the reasoning powers. These predictions, not uncommon to the dream and the vision, present us phenomena kindred with Biblical prophecy. They present us the psychological conditions which show such predictions to be not only possible but probable. How then does Biblical pre- because the poetry has here the hexameter movement (see chap, vii. 7). D''£)V2VDn. The article is here for the vocative case, as often in Hebrew. The absence of the preposition is against taking it as in apposition to D''DV*T''"I ^^' Trwvh is ordinarily taken as exhortation to the people. ".To the law and to the testimony ! " But we should expect in this case the preposition pj?, as in the previous context. 40 MESSIANIC PROPHECY. diction differ from these predictions of the imagination ? An attentive examination of the phenomena ought to convince any scientific observer that the predictions that occur in the dreams and visions of Hebrew prophecy- transcend the native energies of the imagination. The imagination can only reconstruct the material given to it. The predictions of Hebrew prophecy present us material as well as combinations of material that must have had another origin than the previous experience of the pro- phet. The vision of Abraham, as to the 400 years' pilgrimage of his seed in Canaan and in Egypt, not only gives the pilgrimage of his seed in Canaan and in Egypt, which was a natural product of his imagination ; but also the long duration of an affliction through many generations before the ultimate conquest of Canaan and the realization of the covenant promises, which was the reverse of the natural operation of his imagination under the circumstances.^ The dreams of Pharaoh as to the years of plenty and famine, while they sprang out of the natural circumstances of the land of Egypt and the position of Pharaoh, yet in their elaboration they tran- scend any possible combinations of the imagination with- out external guidance, which could hardly have been other than su]3erhuman.^ The necessity of interpretation and the exactness of the interpretation when the secret clue was given, show that the adjustment was that of a higher power which had made the dream to correspond with the predetermined reality. The same is true of the dreams of Nebuchadnezzar, the visions of Daniel and others.^ The natural conditions and features of the person who dreams and is in ecstasy are there, but the prediction itself is so extraordinary, so comprehensive, so exact, so unerring, that it implies an infalHble divine influence. Passing from the prediction of the dream and ^ Gen. XV. * Gen. xli. ^ Dan. ii., vii. PEEDICTIVE PEOPHECT. 41 the vision to the prediction in the song of the ecstatic state, we observe that Balaam's predictions^ were the reverse of his wishes, his hopes and his wilful determina- tion and effort that they should be otherwise. His imagination was constrained by an overpowering influence to bless in the harmonies of sacred song the people whom he anxiously strove to curse in odes of triumph of their enemies. Such prediction cannot be explained by purely natural influences. But ordinarily the predictions of the Hebrew pro- phets issue from men who are in entire sympathy with their utterances. They are expressed with an intensity of emotion and a rhetorical vigour which assume the forms of poetry and song, and sometimes are accompanied with bodily action and symbolical illustration. Predictive prophecy is ordinarily of the highest kind, in the forms of human language spoken or written. As such it expresses the insight and the foresight of the prophet, where the reasoning powers co-operate with the imagination and the fancy in the construction of the grandest conception of prophecy. It is necessary to discriminate the natural from the supernatural features. No one should deny that the Hebrew prophets were men of extraordinary genius. It is not necessary to degrade the Hebrew prophets as men in order to exalt the divine influence that employed them. They exhibit a wonderful familiarity with the history of their nation. They were patriots in the best sense. They show a wide acquaintance with the religious and political afiairs of neighbouring nations. They were statesmen. But above all they were pious men, whose religious experience was intense, whose devotion was pro- found, and whose ethical character was exalted. We expect such men to have wondrous insight and foresight ^ Num. xxiii.-xxiv. 42 MESSIANIC PROPHECY. Their intimate acquaintance with the past, and their familiarity with the present, urged them to a keen appre- hension and a vivid realization of the future. We are not surprised to find prediction mingled with historical instruction and direct practical guidance of the people in the affairs of the present. We should not think it necessary to explain all of the predictions of the prophets from an extraordinary divine influence. As men who were pre-eminently wise, and gifted with the highest religious endowments, living in communion with God, their wisdom was capable of prediction such as transcended that of other men. But when we have eliminated all that can fairly be demanded in this regard, it should be acknowledged by the careful student that there is a great body of Hebrew prediction which cannot be so explained. The insight of the Hebrew prophet is so profound that it transcends the native energies of human perception, the comprehension is so vast that the conception trained to its highest caj)acity could not grasp it, — the foresight is so far- reaching that no human imagination could spring to its goal. Hebrew predictive prophecy, while it arises in accordance with the psychological condition of the human soul, so transcends its normal powers that we are con- strained to think of the divine mind as its source and inspiration. This is true if we measure Hebrew prophecy merely by the consciousness of the individual prophet ; but when we consider that the prophets were linked in a chain, and that their predictions are combined in a system, — an organic whole which no individual proj)het could possibly comprehend, which now stands before the scholarly world in marvellous unity and variety as the object of the study of the ages of the past, which absorbs the energies of the present, and which arches the future PEEDICTIVE TEOPHECY. 43 even to the end of the world, — we are forced to the conviction that the one master of the Hebrew prophets was the Spirit of God ; and that the organic system of prophecy is a product of the mind and will of God. III. THE SYMBOLICAL FORM OF HEBREW PREDICTION. § 17. Prediction from its very nature ^presents the future in the forms of the 'present and the past. These forms are not real and literal representations of the future, but ideal and symlolical. The interpreter finds the ideal prediction in the form of the symbol. Symbolism rises in several grades from the use of external objects of sense to the more internal and higher ideals of the imagination and fancy. We are met on the threshold of Hebrew prediction with the bold statements of Kuenen, that Hebrew prediction has been proved false by history in so many particulars that the system cannot be regarded as true and divine. Its predictions have not been fulfilled in the time allotted them, and the fulfilment is no longer possible. The reverse of the predicted has often happened. Hebrew prediction has been disproved by events, and it must take its place with all other prophecy as a compound of truth and error, of blasted hopes and disappointed expectations.^ These charges will not bear serious examination. They really concern only the scholastic theory of prophecy and misinterpretations of predictions. The scholastic theory of prophecy, which was essentially Montanistic, failed to distinguish between the form and Ihe substance of prophecy. It sought above all verbal accuracy and circumstantial and detailed fulfilment. It sought by strained interpretations to identify prophecy and history. The efibrts to show the literal fulfilment 1 Kuenen in I.e. chap. v. 44 MESSIANIC PROPHECY. of the predictions of Daniel in the history of Israel from the exile to the advent, in its dreadful inconsistencies of interpretation, have so disgraced the science of Biblical Interpretation that it is a marvel that the book has survived such cruel manipulation. The vain efforts to find Christian history depicted in the Apocalypse of John has so damaged the book that we are not surprised that even Christian scholars should have abstained from its study as unprofitable. Predictive prophecy has been made a burden to apologetics by the abuse that has been made of it by self-constituted defenders of the faith and presumptuous champions of orthodoxy. It is necessary that evangelical critics should rescue predictive prophecy from the hands of those who have made such sad mistakes. Kuenen has taken advantage of the errors of the scholastic theory and interpretation of predictive pro- phecy, and has dealt Hebrew prediction the severest blows it has ever received. We shall parry these blows of Kuenen by showing that they have destroyed the scholastic theory, but they have not in the slightest degree injured Hebrew prediction as such. Predictive prophecy has its necessary forms and limitations, which we should carefully study in order to understand it. We shall first distingjuish the form from the substance of the prediction, and then present the necessary limits of Hebrew prediction ; for we would unfold the truth which Tholuck has so well expressed when he says, " It is not prediction of the accidental, but of that which is of religious necessity, which is the essential thing in Hebrew prophecy." ^ Kuenen has the right of it over against the scholastic apologists when he says : " When they assert that the prophecies have been fulfilled exactly and literally, and thence deduce far-reaching consequences, we cannot rest ^ Die Propheten, p. 77. PREDICTIVE PROPHECY. 45 satisfied with the general agreement between the prediction and the historical fact, but must note also along with that the deviation in details, as often as such a deviation is actually apparent." ^ But Kuenen and the Scliolastics are here alike in error, for the prophecies are predictive only as to the essential and the ideal elements. The purely formal elements belong to the point of view and colour- ing of the individual prophets. We are not to find exact and literal fulfilments in detail or in general, but the fulfilment is limited, as the prediction is limited, to the essential ideal contents of the prophecy. We start therefore from the point of view of the prediction, and thence rise through several forms of prediction. The future judgment and redemption, the tv/o poles of predictive prophecy, are necessarily based on present experience of discipline and upon the history of redemp- tion and judicial acts of Jahveh in the past. Looking forth into the future, prophetic prediction clothes and represents that which is to come in the scenery and language familiar to it in the present and in the past. The most suitable events, persons, and things of the past and the present are employed. Hence the type or the symbol lies at the basis of all genuine prediction. The particular type chosen depends partly upon the experience of the prophet and the circumstances of the times ; partly upon divine command or the enlightenment of the prophetic Spirit. § 18. The lowest form of symholic prophecy is the use of external things like cords, sticks, yokes, vessels and the like, to represent in a rude hut graphic way the impending event. The historical books of the Old Testament contain a large number of examples of the use of rude symbols ; 1 111 I.e. p. 132. 46 MESSIANIC PROPHECY. and the prophetical books give not a few of them. Thus Ahijah the Shilonite "laid hold of the new garment which was on him, and rent it in twelve pieces. And he said to Jeroboam, Take thee ten pieces ; for thus saith Jahveh, the God of Israel, Behold, I will rend the kingdom out of the hand of Solomon, and will give ten tribes unto thee." ^ The pieces of garment here symbolize the tribes of Israel, and the rending of the cloth, the division of the tribes into two kingdoms, with ten tribes to one kingdom and two to the other kingdom. Sometimes we cannot be sure whether the symbolic thing was actually used or was simply put into the discourse of the prophet. Thus Ezekiel uses two sticks with the names of Judah and Israel, which he joins to make one stick in his hand in order to represent the ultimate reunion of the kingdoms.^ Jeremiah uses two baskets of figs, the one very good, the other very bad, to represent the good and the evil classes in Israel and the ultimate ruin of the one and redemption of the other.^ These are sufficient examples of a large number of symbohc things used by the Hebrew prophets. No one would look for exact and literal fulfilment of these symbols. All agree in seeking the ideal content. § 19. The Hebrew ^;?'6»j?7i,c^s ordinarily -use liiglicr symhols, which are called types, such as historic persons or events, great institutions, or experiences in real life. The exact correspondence of type and antitype is impossible. The antitype transcends the type as the ideal transcends the form which is inadequate to present it. The doctrine of typology has been greatly abused in the Christian Church, by seeking and finding types every- where in Scripture. There is indeed no limit to the use of types. Almost every person, thing, circumstance or 1 1 Kings xi. 30, 31. ^ Ezek. xxxvii. 16 seq. ^ j^^^ ^^iv. PREDICTIVE PROPHECY. 47 event may be used to represent an antitype in some respect. There is a proper use of typology in the practical interpretation of the historical books. But we have here only to do with the types which the prophets themselves use. These are in sufficient variety as they are gathered from the past or the present, from persons or things, from circumstances or events, from experiences of everyday life, and from the great objects of nature. The type may be a person like Moses, David, or Solomon. What more natural than that the Messiah should be represented as a second Moses, a prophet like him and yet his superior ; a warlike monarch, victorious as David ; a prince of peace like Solomon ? There have been those who have argued from the prediction of a second Elijah, that the original Elijah was to rise from the dead ; but Jesus gave the true interpretation when He saw this second Elijah in John the Baptist.^ The nature of the type is such that it enables us to under- stand in general what the character of the person so represented is to be, but exact identification or literal correspondence between the type and the antitype would be no less absurd than if we were to suppose that the prophet conceived of the resurrection of every person he used as a type, — such a conception would indeed destroy typology altogether. The person is a type used to represent another, person in the particulars of the predic- tion. The person used as a type belongs to the form of the prediction and not to its substance. He is illustrative, descriptive and representative, but nothing more. He no more corresponds with the exact reality of the future than the ten pieces of the garment of Ahijah corresponded with the ten tribes of Israel. When now instead of a person we use an institution like the passover, or the ark of the covenant, or the tiara 1 Matt. xi. 14 ; Mai. iv. 5. 48 MESSIANIC PEOPHECY. of the high priest as symbols of the institutions of the new dispensation, the laws of symbolism forljid that we should expect exact and literal correspondence. They require that with a certain formal correspondence the antitype should be vastly higher and grander in form than the type. Transcendence is essential to the idea of the type. So in the use of a great historic event like the exodus, or the conquest of Canaan, or the captivity in Egypt, or the wanderings in the wilderness to represent the future experience of redemption, to expect exact correspondence and literal fulfilment destroys the very nature of typology. The higher we ascend in symbolism the more difficult the discrimination between the essential ideal of the symbol and the unimportant clothing, but this does not justify the interpreter in insisting upon exact and literal conformity in the one case any more than in the other. It rather urges to a closer study of the symbol in order to make those discriminations upon which the meaning of the prediction depends. For the Hebrew prophets rise to the most intricate themes in their symbolism. They not only use the external history of the past with its great persons, institutions and events, but they freely employ the great persons and institutions and events of their own times, and even enter into the deep and sacred experiences of their own souls, in order to represent the innermost experience of future persons and generations. To expect exact and literal fulfilment of such types is unnatural and unscientific. It transc^resses the nature of the type, which requires that the symbol or type should represent the prediction only in certain given features. The type is the clothing of the predicted ideal. It is the duty of the interpreter to determine the essential idea, and to decline to allow himself to be absorbed either in the general features or in the minute details of the type. PKEDICTIVE PrtOPHECY. 49 It is the one aim of the interpreter to find the key to the symbol, and by it unlock the mystery of the repre- sentation. For predictive prophecy is and must be a higher parabolic teaching. If the Hebrew moralists used ancient stories and legends, and clothed them with familiar scenery in order to point a lesson (and the Hebrew Haggada is full of this method of instruction) — if our Saviour used the parable to enforce an ideal that was to be of everlasting importance and we find it a delightful task to search for the key, why should any one deem it essential to find exact correspondence in the prophetic symbol ? Why should he not rather use every effort to find the door to its mysteries ? Indeed, predictive prophecy from its very nature not only assumes the symbolic form, but it hides its solution. For the peril to prediction is in efforts on the part of false prophets and impostors to realize it. The clue is a secret clue, often so carefully hidden that centuries of study have not found it. Prophecy is its own interpreter, and it is often designed by the infinite mind that its solution should remain unknown until the event itself occurred. Like the predictive dreams of Pharaoh and Nebuchadnezzar, they need a Joseph or a Daniel to find the golden thread to guide through their labyrinthine mysteries. The great symbols of Hebrew predictive prophecy remained riddles of comfort and warning — all the more dread and inspiring from their profound and awful mystery — until they were resolved by the events predicted. The first advent is the great resolver of all Old Testament prophecy. Jesus opened the understanding of His apostles that they might understand the Scriptures. The second advent will give the key to New Testament prophecy. It is the Lamb that has been slain, the everlasting and blessed One who alone opens the sealed book, solves the riddles of time, and resolves the symbols of ]3rophecy. 60 MESSIANIC PROPHECY. § 20. Tlie Hebrew prophets rise to a higher use of syriibolism in the constructions of the imagination and the fancy. Tliey eni'ploy the parable, the allegory and the tale. In these forms of prediction there . is a contrast between the real and the ideal, which is sometimes expressed in the extravagance and grotesqueness of the representation. The fulfilment is the reverse of literal and. exact cor- responde7ice. Hebrew prophecy rises above the simple use of the type to a higher form which has been called typico- prophetic. Sometimes the type remains by itself as if by simple index, without explanation, it would point out in a graphic symbol as a sign the impending future ; but often the type is found inadequate in itself for the work of prediction. The prophet works with it, strains and stretches it beyond any possible proportions, so that it becomes extravagant and even grotesque. This use of the type is in order to emphasize the contrast between the type and the antitype, and shows that exact, literal correspondence is impossible. Thus the poet uses a gigantic vine to illustrate the marvellous growth of the kingdom of God. It was transplanted from Egypt to Canaan, covered the whole land, reached with its branches from the Mediterranean to the Euphrates, cast the cedars of Lebanon in shade of its gigantic boughs.^ Thus Daniel uses the stone cut out of the mountain without hands growing to become a vast mountain filling the whole earth.^ The mountain of the house of Jahveh rises above the highest mountains.^ Ezekiel represents the New Jerusalem and the holy land in impossible proportions and situations.* Some of these cases are so grotesque and extravagant that no one could for a moment think of an exact and literal fulfilment. And ^ Ps. Ixxx. * Dan. ii. • ]\Iiciih iv. Isa ii. * Ezek. xl. seq. PKEDICTIVE PEOPHECY. 51 yet there are a large number of predictions wliicli in their proper interpretation are no less impossible. These have been so interpreted by Scholastics as to find exact fulfilment, and by Eationalists as to show that they have not been fulfilled. A striking example of this is the new temple and holy land and institutions of Ezekiel, and under this head may be brought all that large class relating to Israel's future which Kuenen argues to be unfulfilled and to be impossible of fulfilment. He classi- fies them thus : (1) the return of Israel out of captivity ; (2) the reunion of Ephraim and Judah ; (3) the supremacy of the house of David ; (4) the spiritual and material welfare of the restored Israel ; (5) the relation between Israel and the Gentiles ; (6) Israel's undisturbed con- tinuance in the land of their habitation.^ If exact and literal fulfilment of these prophecies was designed in the predictions, then we must agree with Kuenen that they have been disproved by history ; but it is against the laws of prophetic prediction so to inter- pret them. These predictions are not only impossible now, but in form many of them always were impossible. Israel in predictive prophecy is not Israel after the flesh but Israel after the spirit, as the Apostle Paul explains.^ The true children of Abraham are the faithful.^ The Christian Church is the legitimate successor of the Israel of old and the heir of its promises.* The essential contents of these predictions when eliminated from their formal elements are spiritual and not carnal.^ The type was made extravagant and impossible so as to show that the ideal contents were in contrast with their formal presentation. It is thus essential to this form of pre- diction that the realization should be the reverse of literal and exact correspondence. 1 In I.e. p. 189 seq. 2 j^o^ [^ g^q, 3 j^q^^ jy, * 1 Pet. ii. 4 seq. * Konig in l,c. ii p. 396 seq. 52 MESSIA.N1C PROPHECY. § 21. The highest form of Hehrew prophecy is called direct prophecy. But even here the symbolical form is iiot abandoned. There is a more subtile use of symbolical language. This is especially true in the combinations of sacred numbers. The secret clue is to be discovered as the only safe guide to interpretation. The highest form attained by Hebrew prediction is ordinarily called direct j)rophecy. It seldom is found alone, but usually accompanies the type as its explana- tion. Sometimes the type is abandoned as inadequate, and symbolical language assumes its place for the higher stage of the prediction. Then again the prediction rises in three stages. Beginning with the type, the prophet advances to such a use of it that it becomes extravagant in his hands. It is then cast aside and he springs to his climax in direct prophecy. Even in this highest form of prediction the symbolical form is not abandoned, it is only changed to the use of figurative, illustrative, descrip- tive language, and the interpretation instead of becoming easier has become more difficult. This is especially the case ill the use of numbers. It is just here that the Apologists have made the greatest blunders which the Eationalists have not been slow to utihze for the destruction of Hebrew prophecy. Thus Kuenen insists that because the prophets expected that their predictions would soon be realized ^ and that the events predicted were close at hand,^ they were mistaken, and their predictions were not fulfilled even when they happened at a long time subsequently or may yet be capable of realization. So it is represented that because Jesus and His apostles expected the second advent very soon after the first that they were mistaken. But all these objections rest upon a mistaken conception of predictive prophecy. The times of prophecy are as 1 lu i.c. p. loa 2 i^ iq^ p. 110. PREDICTIVE PEOPHECT. 53 symbolical as the objects themselves. We claim that all prophetical numbers are symbolical, and that none of them are to be taken as exact or literal. The efforts of interpreters to determine from the numbers of Daniel the intervals to the first advent have ignominiously failed. The efforts of interpreters to measure the times of the Apocalypse and indicate the times of the second advent are worse than ridiculous. Those who indulge in such follies are blindly labouring to undermine and destroy Hebrew prophecy and the Bible itself, of which it is an essential part. The prophets all share in this characteristic feature of presenting their predictions as near of realization.^ If the prophetic numbers are taken as exact and literal, consistency of interpretation forces us to regard these terms also as exact and literal. But if we take this position, then we cannot escape the conclusion that all of the prophets were in error as to the element of time, and that their predictions were in so far false. But we claim that the prophetic temporal terminology is symboli- cal as prophetic prediction is throughout symbolical, and that exact and literal numbers are against the essential principle of prediction. It would reduce predictive prophecy to a system of chronology. The prophetic numbers are riddles and enigmas to be solved after the key is found. The meaning is not on the surface. This is true also of the terms near and at hand. The pro- phets ever continue to use these expressions as the technical language of prophecy. How could they go on doing so if these terms had a strict and exact meaning ? Every prophet would appear to his successors as in error in this particular. Nearness to Joel would prove a long historical distance to Isaiah. Isaiah's nearness would be 1 The Hebrew term mp and the Greek 'iyyvg are essential pro- phetic terminology. 54 MESSIANIC PEOPHECY. long past to Jeremiah, and Jeremiah's to Malachi, and yet they go on representing the day of Jahveh as at hand — His judgments and His redemption as near, without any indications of a lack of confidence in their predecessors, but with a full reliance upon the integrity of prophecy. And Jesus and His apostles use these identical terms in the same way, although all the prophetic predictions of the Old Testament were remote to them. Still further, while Jesus uses this prophetic termi- nology, He expressly teaches that the times and seasons are reserved to God, that no man, or angel, or even the Son of man can define them.-^ These terms must therefore have a technical prophetic sense, and this is not difficult to determine. The nearness and the at hand of prophetic prediction indicate the certainty of the events. They are as vivid to the mind and as ardently desu-ed or anxiously dreaded as the events of to-morrow. They are on the to-morrow of prophecy — those latter days in view of which every intervening time is of infinitesimal importance and overlooked as of trifling moment. The nearness and at hand of prophetic prediction indicate also the uncertainty of the time. The interval between the to-day of prophecy and the to-morrow of prophecy is but a night-time of uncertain duration, so uncertain that to-day is and must ever be of supreme importance. For to-day is a preparation, not for the interval until the last days, but for the last day itself, which is at hand in the sense that it is ever impending. Thus in every form of prediction the laws of predic- tion preclude exact and literal fulfilment. They require us to find the key or clue, and only by the key or clue can we find those essential ideal elements, originally designed in the prediction, embodied in it, stereotyped therein, and waiting for the time when the event will ^ Matt. xxiv. 42 seq. ; Mark xiii. 32 seq. ; Acts i. 7. PREDICTIVE PROPHECY. 55 justify them and prove their reality and their divine origin. When Hebrew prophecy is regarded from this point of view, we observe that its fulfilment has been raised above the designs of impostors and deceivers. False Messiahs have presented themselves as fulfillers of Hebrew prophecy, and these have ever pointed to some trivial details, and urged literal and exact correspondence ; but when the true Messiah came. His correspondence with prophecy was not distinctly recognized. It was not exact and literal. It was not on the surface. It was not until the death on the cross, the resurrection and ascension of the Messiah that the key to Old Testament prophecy was given, and its solution found in part. The risen Saviour opened the understanding of His apostles that they might understand the Scriptures. It will not be until the second advent that the ultimate solution of the prophetic system will be given. The first advent resolved all Hebrew prophecy into two great parts, and in giving us the fulfilment of the one part it guarantees the fulfilment of the other part. IV. THE LIMITS OF PREDICTION. § 22. The prophets are human beings, and although they hecome the instruments of eonveying divine ideas to their fellow-men, yet these divine ideas assume the forms and the clothing of the human medium through which they pass. They cannot transcend the psychological and physical features of human nature. The prophets being men of intellectual and moral worth, influenced by the divine Spirit to think, feel and act with reference to the divine ideas imparted to them, they speak and write and act under the physical and psychological laws of their own being. The prophets, looking into the future, follow the lines of the move- 56 MESSIANIC PROPHECY. ments of their own times, tracing them to their results. Their insight and foresight are intensified by the energy of the divine Spirit which enlarges their native intellec- tual and moral powers to the extent that may be necessary for the purposes of the prediction. § 23. It is a law of jpredictive pro^phecy that the pro- phet foresees the final goal to which the movements of his time are tending, and which they will inevitably reach ; hut he does not foresee all the conditions and circumstances that intervene or modify the approaches to that end. He predicts in a few broad outlines and graphic touches, but he is not and he cannot be an annalist or a historian. He sees the final end of redemption or of judgment upon the individual, the nation or the world ; but he cannot grasp in his conception or delineate in his representation all the forces converging to that end, or the various curvings of the historical movements in their approaches to the ideal. He sees the end to be attained, and the relation to that end of the persons or things or events in which he is more immediately concerned ; but he cannot see the intervening objects and events, and the forces constantly increasing in complexity as they con- verge towards it/ The prophet stands as it were upon a lofty mountain. Far in the distance, beyond the range that bounds the horizon of his generation, he sees the goal of the journey. But he cannot see all the hills and valleys, the rocks and streams and the lesser mountain ranges which intervene between him and the predicted goal. It seems but a short journey, and it would be short if it were possible to move on directly to the goal. But this is not possible, for events must take their course in accordance with ^ Riehm in I.e. 2 Aufl. p. 104 seq. ; Edinburgh edition, p. 84 seq. ; also Konig in I.e. ii. p. 307 seq. PREDICTIVE PROPHECY. 57 human conditions and circumstances. The prophet cannot emancipate himself from his human nature and surroundings. He cannot divest himself of his historic position and circumstances. He cannot ignore or escape his point of view. God has given him his position as a religious teacher in a particular generation and in a certain epoch of the world's history and in a certain geographical locality. Hence his prediction clothes itself with the local, the temporal and the circumstantial dress. The future events cannot be presented in prediction in the circumstances of the future and from the point of view of the future. If that were so it would no longer be prediction, but history. § 24. Prediction rises above temporal measurements and chronological distinctions. The end in view ever seems near as the object of hope and ardent longing, or the object of dread and anxious foreboding, the central theme of the message of comfort or of warning ; and yet the prophet knows not the times or seasons which God hath reserved to Himself The prophet may be able to measure the distance in time in symbolical numbers having in the proportions of prophecy a relative importance ; but he cannot count in measures of human time, or enable his interpreters in subsequent ages to calculate better than himself.^ The times of prophecy are enigmatical and in the highest degree uncertain. If they show, on the one hand, the great deliberation of God, that He prepares the way for the fulfilment of His promises as if a thousand years were but a day or the fraction of a night, and that He waits for the completion of the appointed time when the ages have became full and ripe for the event ; they yet show, on the other hand, the swift and inevitable movement of 1 Riehm in I.e. 2 Aufl. p. 109 seq. 58 MESSIANIC PKOPHECY. the divine purpose, as if a thousand years' labour were to be accomplished in a day or an hour or a moment ; for when that moment approaches, which is the final goal of all prophecy, that supreme hour of the world, that day of doom, which is ever presented as near and at hand, events will move with the rapidity of the lightning flash and surprise the whole creation with that most wonderful transformation, which is the ripe fruit of the entire development of the earth, the birth for which the creation has been travailing through the centuries. This then is the ringing lesson of all predictive pro- phecy. Be patient in suffering, for redemption is surely coming — we know not how quickly. Eepent immediately, for the day of judgment may come at any moment. This is the constant attitude of Biblical prophecy — this is the lesson of its symbolical near and at Imnd. § 25. There is an uncertain factor in all prediction which depends upon the ever varying relations of God and man in the interp)lay of human freedom and divine law. The variation of motives in the divine mind and in human experience, and the corresponding variation of forces in history, shorten or prolong, simplify or maize complex and uncertain all preparatory times and events. This is the most difficult and the most neglected of all the limitations of Hebrew prediction. It vsprings out of the divine constitution of the individual man, and the complex organization of human society and national life. Kuenen very properly emphasizes this point, but in such a way as to make Hebrew prediction altogether human and altogether uncertain.^ We should use great caution here so as not to do violence either to the divdne or the human element. The representations of Scripture show very clearly that there is a divine motive for ' In I.e. p. 346 seq. PEEDICTIVE PROPHECY. 59 hastening the time of prediction, namely, in order to the redemption of the elect. And there is a divine motive for lengthening the interval, to increase their number. And so men must sometimes pray for the coming of the Eedeemer, and then again for the progress of redemption. This interplay of motives in the divine mind and in human petition, and of forces in history, shorten and prolong and render uncertain all preparatory times and institutions. In the predictions of judgment there are limitations in the warning to repentance and the possi- bility of redemption. In the predictions of redemption there are ever limitations in warnings against sin and apostasy and the possibility of judgment. Thus in the larger frame of the prediction there are conflicting forces and movements which cannot prevent its ultimate reahzation, but which lengthen or shorten the interval and modify the circumstances and conditions. Hebrew prophecy is not ashamed of occasional re- calling of circumstantial threatenings and promises. God is the Sovereign and Father of His people.-^ He has not wound up human events like a clock and left it to unwind itself in the remorseless swing of its pendulum. He watches over the destinies of the world with patient love and providential care. In the general drift of His purpose and the immense sweep of His design He has provided for occasional modifications and adaptations to time and place and circumstances. God and man are united in the working out of the purpose of redemption, and that working gives opportunity to repentance unto salvation. The conditional element does not destroy the essential prediction any more than it destroys the work- ings of God in the past and the present. It rather enhances the glory of Hebrew predictive prophecy that it has room for the free play of the conditional factor, * Konig in I.e. p. 390 seq. 60 MESSIANIC PEOPHECY. without permitting it to modify the determinative and essential factor. Ever bounding the prophetic range of insight and fore- sight is the horizon of a complete redemption. It is the same with each prophet as he comes with a fresh message and sees farther and wider and deeper than his pre- decessors ; and so along the whole line of prophets even into the New Testament and in the prophetic utterances of Jesus and His apostles. This does not show any in- correctness in the earlier prophecies, but rather that they were what they must be from the very nature of the case, partial and incomplete. The prophetic inspiration is all the grander, that these partial revelations coming from so many different persons, in widely different inter- vals of time, yet fit into each other with the utmost nicety, adjusting themselves to the harmonious proportions of one complete and perfect system of divine revelation ; as so many folds of a developing germ, unfolding slowly yet grandly in majestic proportions into the historical Messiah, Christian salvation, the second advent hope and the Dies irae, V. MESSIANIC PROPHECY. § 26. The central theme and the culmination of Hebrew prophecy is the Messiomic ideal. Messianic pro- phecy is the prediction of the completion of redemption through the Messiah. Hebrew prophecy rises in higher and higher stages until it culminates in Messianic prophecy. This is the central theme about which all its lessons cluster. This is the fountain whence all its streams of blessing and of cursing flow in never-ending succession. Messianic pro- phecy is the prediction of the fulfilment of redemption through the Messiah. This prediction is not confined to PREDICTIVE PROPHECY. 61 official prophets — it is not limited to any form of Old Testament literature. It is found in the history and in the poetry as well as in the prophetic books. It is indeed spread all over the literature of the Bible as the thread of light that binds its writings into an organism of redemption. Messianic prophecy is in some respects not an adequate term, for we do not limit ourselves to those predictions which point evidently to a personal Messiah. The material of Messianic prophecy embraces the work as well as the person of the Messiah ; and indeed all those benefits that result to the kingdom of God through Him ; in other words, everything that has to do with the future redemption. Hence von Orelli prefers the term " com- pletion of the kingdom of God." ^ But the kingdom of God is in some respects too wide a term and in other respects too narrow. The completion of redemption is the proper idea rather than the completion of the king- dom of God. But inasmuch as this completion is accomplished only through the Messiah, — as His person is the central theme to which the fulfilment of redemp- tion ever points, — it seems better to embrace Him in the definition and make His name the characteristic one in the general terminology. This we do sufficiently well if we embrace all the elements under the term Messianic prophecy and define it as the completion of redemption through the Messiah. We have then to determine the relation of the com- pletion of redemption through the Messiah to the general doctrine of redemption in Hebrew prophecy. The doctrines of Hebrew prophecy may be embraced under the three divisions : God, Man, and Eedemption. The doctrine of redemption may be presented — (1) As a pre- ^ C. von Orelli, The Old Testament Prophecy of the Consummation of GocPs Kingdom traced in its Historical Development, Edin. 1885. 62 MESSIANIC PROPHECY. sent possession of the people of God ; (2) as an acquisi- tion in a future state ; (3) as completed in the times of the Messiah. The first is the doctrine of redemption proper, the second is the doctrine of the future state, the third is Messianic prophecy. Indeed the three develop necessarily out of the prophetic doctrine of redemption. The Biblical doctrine of redemption as a divine revela- tion has the characteristic of completeness. It is ever unfolding to perfection. It contains in its earliest state- ments the whole doctrine of redemption in germ. It comprehends at once the past, the present and the future. It covers this life, the coming life in this world and the future life beyond the grave. It is essentially progressive redemption. The present redemption kindles the hope of a more complete redemption in the future. As the past leads on to the present, so the present advances into the future, and the attention is fixed upon the ultimate goal of glory. To the individual and the succeeding generation this must be beyond the gateway of death ; but to the chosen people as a people, and to the race of man which is conceived as an everlasting unit, there is a steady and constant advance to the Messianic goal. Hebrew pre- dictive prophecy, in its view of redemption in the future, springs from past and present experience of redemption. The Old Testament redemption advances in a long line of historic and predictive succession towards the New Testament redemption, and the New Testament redemption marches onward towards the redemption of the Messianic end, and in this end it is the privilege of the living and the departed alike to share. Thus the two systems of present advancing redemption and future completed redemption are related as substance and shadow, as type and antitype, as the building in course of erection to the finished building, as the elementary and preparatory A PREDICTIVE PKOPHECY. 63 studies to the perfected wisdom. In the redemptive system of the Old Testament we see the unfolding germ whose flower and fruit appear under the New Covenant. The child Israel is trained by the pedagogy of prophecy for the manhood of Messianic times. The redemption of the Law and the Prophets is realized in Him who came to fulfil the Law and the Prophets. And thus the Messianic prophecy of the Old Testament may be re- garded as the New Testament in the Old — the ever living and developing ideal which inspired the faith, hope and love of the Old Testament saints, and gave their elementary redemption its sole efficacy and grace. And so with still greater intensity of meaning the New Testament Messianic idea has as its mission the edifi- cation of the Church of Christ and its preparation for the grander and ultimate glories of the perfect redemption of the second advent and the end of the world. VI. THE FULFILMENT OF MESSIANIC PROPHECY. * § 2 7. Messianic jprophecy is an advancing organism expressing in ever richer and fuller representations the ideal of complete redemption through the Messiah. History advances with prophecy toward the samx goal, hut prediction points the way. History constantly approximates to the Messianic ideal. It seems to fulfil the prediction as it advances, and to give ground for the theory of a douhle sense or a progressive fulfilment; hut this is only the preparation of history for the real fulfilment which awaits it at the end of the course in the Messiah of history, the suffering, reigning and glorified Redeemer. The essential ideal of Messianic prophecy determines the principles by which it is to be interpreted. It is the highest and the essential phase of predictive prophecy. It is yet an ideal in constant development. There is no 64 MESSIANIC PEOPHECY. section of Biblical doctrine which has been so little understood and so much abused as Messianic prophecy. The Scholastics have interpreted the Messianic passages in accordance with the Christian doctrine of the person and work of Christ, from the point of view of a logical system of theology derived from the Bible, and they have ignored the organic system of Messianic prophecy in the ^ Bible itself. They have overlooked the stages of develop- v ment of the Messianic idea. They have neglected its varied phases. They have seen neither the unity nor the variety of the organism. They have sought above all things an Old Testament Christology. On the other hand, Kationalists have ignored the ideal element, and, in limiting the Messianic prediction to the local, temporal and circumstantial elements, determine the substance of the prediction by its external form, seeking in every- way to exclude references to the Messiah and the redemption brought to the world through Him. If pre- dictive prophecy in general can be interpreted only by finding the key, much more is this the case with Messianic prophecy, the culmination of predictive pro- phecy. For this we need the Master's key — that will unlock the mysteries of each prediction, and pass us through the entire system of predictions. We hesitate not therefore to state that the key of Old Testament prophecy is the first advent of the Messiah which unlocks a large number of its chambers. Bat the key of the entire system will not be given until the second advent. But this does not justify us in forcing New Testament meaning into Old Testament passages. If the Messiah gives us the key, He does not transform the predictions into histories. It is still necessary for us to see the connection between the Messiah as the central object of the prediction and the mind of the predicting prophet and tlie stage of redemption present to his PREDICTIVE PROPHECY. 65 experience. There is but one legitimate method for the interpretation of Messianic prophecy, and that is, (1) to study each prediction by itself with the most patient criticism and painstaking exegesis in all the details ; (2) to study it in relation to other predictions in the series and note the organic connection ; (3) to study it in rela- tion to Christ and His redemption. Such a method will discern that Messianic prophecy of the Old Testament is an organic whole — an advancing organism culminating in the Christ of the incarnation, of the cross and of the throne. This enables us to test the theory of the double sense. There is no double sense to Hebrew prediction. The prediction has but one sense. But inasmuch as the prediction advances from the temporal redemption of its circumstances to tbo eternal redemption of the Messiah, and it is part of a system of predictions in which the experience of redemption is advancing, it cannot be otherwise than that some of the elements of the predicted redemption should be realized in historical experience ere the essential element of the Messianic redemption is attained. This has induced some inter- preters to speak of a successive fulfilment, or of a fulfilment in gradual approximation to the end. This is not a true representation of the facts of the case. There is but one fulfilment in the Messianic times. But all history is preparing the way and advancing toward that fulfilment. As prediction is rising in suc- cessive stages to higher and broader and more extensive views of the Messianic redemption, the history of re- demption is advancing with it towards the same end. Thus we ought to expect that the Messianic ideal should be realized in some of its phases ere the ideal itself is attained, and that the later predictions should base themselves on these partial realizations. But we should 66 MESSIANIC PROPHECY. not be willing to acknowledge that the predictions find their fulfilment in these historic and predictive approxi- mations. The Messianic ideal is the one essential thing to be determined in its relation to the Messianic end. The Messianic idea, in its historic development, will separate itself more and more from the temporal, the local and the circumstantial, in order to rise to greater heights. We shall take care therefore in tracing its development to note this gradual differentiation, and to observe at the same time the historic process of redemp- tion in its preparation for and advance toward this ideal, which, like the city of God and the enthroned Eedeemer, ever rises in greater glory before it. CHAPTEE III. PRIMITIVE MESSIANIC IDEAS. There are several Messianic prophecies in the Penta- teuch, — that unique collection of material relating to the origin of Israel and mankind. These prophecies are separated by wide intervals of time, — they mark the great epochs of the world from the origin of our race until the settlement of Israel in the land of Canaan. These prophecies are contained chiefly in ancient pieces of poetry, which the several authors of the narra- tives of the Pentateuch inserted in their histories. They received their present order from the hands of an inspired editor, who combined these ancient stories into a match- less organism to constitute for all time the fundamental divine Word to mankind.-^ ^ The analysis of the Pentateuch into four distinct narratives, with their distinct codes of legislation, is the result of a century of study by the most famous critics of the age. There are slight differences of opinion in the analysis at some points ; but these are chiefly at the seams which bind the narratives together, and are due to the editor's work, who in his efforts to make the entire com- position as harmonious and symmetrical as possible, sometimes obscured the signs of difference. But the concord of critics in the work of analysis as a whole is wonderful, in view of the difficulties that beset the work of higher criticism. The few objectors among Hebrew scholars display their own unfamiliarity with the practical work of criticism, when they overlook these solid results and point to the difficulties as evidences that the problem has not been solved. The differences of opinion among practical critics, and the difficulties in the analysis, are where they ought to be from the very nature of the case. Instead of disproving the work of criticism, they are therefore an indirect evidence of its correctness. The differences and difficulties disappear one after another as the investigation 67 68 MESSIANIC PROPHECY. The priestly narrator, in the first chapter of Genesis, gives an ancient poem of the creation/ In the sixth strophe we have a description of the endowment of man- kind as the last, the highest and the best of the host of God. § 28. Mankind was created in the divine image, and endoived with dominion over the creatures. His destiny was to assume sovereigntij, and take possession of the earth ty a numerous ^posterity, "And God said, Let us make mankind in our image and according to our figure, That they may have dominion over the fish of the sea and the birds of heaven and the cattle. And over all the earth, and over all that creep upon the earth. And God created mankind in his image, In the image of God he created him, Male and female he created them. advances. The evidences for the analysis into four narratives are — (1) Differences in use of words and phrases ; (2) differences in style and methods of composition ; (3) differences in point of view and representations of religious institutions, doctrines and morals. We have given this latter subject a thorough investigation. We have by careful induction gathered the theology of each of the documents by itself and then compared them, and have found such a thorough- going difference, that it is simply impossible that they should have come from the same original author. We hope at some future time to present the theology of the Pentateuch to the public. In the meanwhile we refer to Dillmann, Genesis, 4th Aufi. 1882 ; Reuss, Gesch. der Heiligea Schriften A. T. 1881 ; Kuenen, Hist. crit. Onder- zoek, i. 1885 ; Wellhausen, Die Composition des Hexateuchs, in hia Shizzen u. Vorarbeiten, ii. 1885; also my "Critical Study of the History of the Higher Criticism," Presbyterian Review, 1883, p. 69 seq. Scholars are not agreed in the names that they give to the four documents. The priestly narrator is the Q. of Wellhausen, the A. or first Elohist of Dillmann. The jjrophetic narrator is the Jahvist. The theocratic narrator is the second Elohist. The Deuteronomist is agreed to by all. ^ See my article on " The Poem of the Creation," in the Old Testament StvdeMy April 1884. PRIMITIVE MESSIANIC IDEAS. 69 And God blessed them and said unto them, Be fruitful and multiply, and fill the earth and subdue it, And have dominion over the fish of the sea and the birds of heaven, And over all the animals which creep upon the earth. And God said, Lo I I do give you all herbage, The seed scatterer which is on the face of the earth. And all the trees in which is the fruit of the tree scattering seed ; For you shall it become food, and for all the animals of the earth. And for all the birds of the heaven, and for everything creeping upon the earth. In whatever there is breath of life — all the greenness of herbage I do give for food. And it became so ; and God saw all that he had made, and it was very excellent." —Gen. i. 26-30. The poet represents that mankind was endowed with the image and figure of the heavenly intelligences with whom God consulted in making our race.^ That image is the essential form, the mode of manifestation of heavenly beings. It is not merely physical, it is not merely moral, it is the form in which the essential nature manifests itself, the inner form, the mode of being which distinguishes man and his archetypes from all other beings, — that form which shapes the physical in the world of sense into the graceful and majestic body which distinguishes man from all other creatures, and which in 1 The plurals n^V^ and ^3Di^^ are referred by the older inter- preters to the Trinity; but this overlooks the several stages in the divine revelation. The doctrine of the Trinity is a Christian doctrine, and it was first revealed in the New Testament. Some have thought of a co-operation of God and nature in the production of man, but this is against the usage of the poem, which represents God as com- manding His host, and nature as obedient to His commands. Dill- mann and Orelli explain the jjlural of the verb and suffix after the analogy of the emphatic plural of the noun, so that God speaks out of the fulness of His own being. But such a usage of the verb and suffix is elsewhere unknown. It is best to think of God as associat- ing with Himself, in the creation of man, the heavenly intelligences whose form, as well as that of God Himself, man shares. This is the view of Philo, Targum Jonathan, Easchi, Aben Ezra, G abler and Delitzsch, and is in accordance with Ps. viii. 6, which is based on our passage. (See § 49 of this volume.) 70 MESSIANIC PEOPHECY. the spirit world is the mode of manifestation by which individuals are distinguished from one another and recognise one another. The image of God with which man is endowed covers his entire nature — it is the form of his essential being.^ In this image of God the destiny of man is involved. This is presented in our poem as having dominion over the other creatures of God, the earth itself, and the animal and vegetable species upon it. This dominion is to be obtained not by an individual man, or a pair, but by a human race. Man was created in sexes, was blessed with fruitfulness, and commanded to fill the earth and subdue it. All things without restriction were given into his hands — all animals and the entire vegetable world. The entire earth and its wealth are to be subdued by his godlike majesty and power. Man is the lord of nature. He is very excellent, and all things that are given by the Creator into his care are likewise very excellent as an organized host of God. There were no sin and no evil. Man was supreme over all, and his destiny was to assert his supremacy over all ^ n?)i and niD*l are synonymous. They both refer to the form or figure of man, and not to the pictorial Kkeness. Some theologians refer the form to the higher nature of man. But there is nothing in the text or context to suggest such an interpretation. The con- text m-ges us to think of the entire man as distinguished from the lower forms of creation, — that which is essential to man and may be communicated by descent to his seed. The bodily form cannot be excluded from the representation. Indeed it is this form which is assumed by angels and the theophanic Malakh and the Son of God Himself. The bodily form is only the physical expression of a spiritual form which continues with man in Sheol after death, in which also God reveals Himself to disembodied spirits in the future life (Ps. xvii. 15). This form is indeed the mode of expression of the heavenly intelligences in their relations to each other. It involves all the higher endowments of man, his reason, conscience, intelli- gence, power of speech, all by which, as a higher being, he acts in the world of spirits and tlie world of matter. Physical matter is not the form of man, it is shaped and used by the form, which is essentially spiritual, and it disappears with the decay of tht material substance. PRIMITIVE MESSIANIC IDEAS. 71 the earth. This is conceived as a task before him to be accomplished only through a numerous posterity. It is through the multiplication of the children of men that the earth is to be subdued and the sovereignty of man- kind accomplished. This is not the reduction to sub- mission of a series of hostile provinces and rebellious creatures ; but the gradual taking possession of a king- dom given to mankind by God, and which he assumes in province after provmce of his vast domain by divine right. This blessing and original endowment of mankind is not specifically a Messianic prophecy, and yet it is the condition and framework of all prophecy, for it is the divine plan for mankind — the divinely - appointed goal of his history. I. THE PROTEVANGELIUM. § 29. The protevangelmm is a divine blessing wrapt in Judgments. It predicts the ultimate victory of the seed of the woman over the serpent, after a conflict in which both parties will he wounded. Messianic prophecy begins with the dawn of human history. The history of mankind opens with a sublime tragedy — the original sin of our first parents, and their expulsion from the garden in Eden. They bear with them from Paradise the Magna Charta of human history ; they enter into the world to engage in a life -long struggle whose issue is death and victory. From their Creator's hands they received the protevangelium, the glad tidings of redemption. It was wrapt about with curses and sorrows ; thereby they recognise God as their Eedeemer. The protevangelium is contained in the poem of the Fall of Mankind, with which the prophetic narrator begins his story. The human pair had been 72 MESSIANIC PROPHECY. formed by the hands of God, and the breath of His nostrils had imparted to them life and inteUigence. God entered into the sphere of his own creation in theophany, in order to endow mankiad with godlike faculties and train them in their exercise. The garden, with its trees and animals, was for the education of our race. There can be no religious training without trial. The temptation was necessary for the ethical culture of Adam and Eve. The tree of life and the tree of death set before them in simple, graphic and impressive forms the good and the evil. The enjoyment of the permissible good gave them an increasing experimental knowledge of the good. The abstinence from the prohibited e\al gave them an increasing theoretic knowledge of the evil ; and thus the discrimination between the good and the evil became sharper as they advanced in ethical culture. The trees had accomplished their purpose, the time had come for a higher temptation, the animal tempter is added to the tree. An evil spirit assumes the form of the serpent, and tempts the woman to trans- gression. The serpent is evidently something more than the animal serpent. There is intelligence, conception, speech, and knowledge higher than that of the man or the woman. The woman knew that she had to deal, not with a mere serpent, one of the animals under her dominion, but with a higher power, a spiritual intelli- gence, who had entered the garden in hostihty to her Creator, with the avowed purpose of delivering man from bondage. As the Creator assumed human form in order to the creation and trainmg of the human pair in the garden of Eden, so now a hostile spirit assumed the form of the serpent in order to deceive and ruin them. Tliere is nothing in this primitive poem to indicate that the author attributed to the animals of Eden powers of TRIMITIVE MESSIANIC IDEAS. 73 reasoning and speech. The author would rather, by attributing the naming of animals to man, and by- showing that man could find no companion among them, imply that the powers of reasoning and speech were endowments of man which the animals did not possess. The tempter assails all the avenues of human nature. The woman's physical appetite is excited by the fruit of the tree ; her sesthetic sense is attracted by its beauty ; her intellectual powers are stimulated by the promise of godlike knowledge ; she ought to have resisted and to have overcome this temptation, and thereby advanced to a higher state of godlikeness in the possession and enjoyment of the good ; but she was seduced and she was overpowered ; she yielded and she fell. She seduced her husband and he fell with her. The human pair fell from godlikeness and became like evil spirits. But there was a difference between the tempter and his victims, and in that difference there was the possibility of redemp- tion. There was a threefold gradation in guilt and a threefold gradation in punishment. For the evil spirit, the tempter, there was no excuse. He was altogether a tempter and blasphemer. The woman was tempted, and sinned, and became a tempter. The man was tempted and transgressed. God appears in theophany as Judge and as Eedeemer. He presents our race with the protevangelium wrapt in the severe sentences of judgment pronounced upon the three transgressors. Herein is the germ of promise which unfolds in the history of redemption. Out of the despair of the first fall, in the experience of the first sin and shame, sorrow and pain, the heart of man rebounds with hope into the future which was opened by the divine prediction. It was the voice of the theophanic God which said unto the serpent — 74 MESSIANIC PROPHECY. " Because thou hast done this, cursed be thou, Away from all beasts and from all animals of the field ; Upon thy belly shalt thou go, And dust shalt thou eat all the days of thy life. And enmity will I put between thee and the woman, And between thy seed and her seed ; lie shall bruise thee on the head, And thou shalt bruise him on the heel." * — Gen. iii. 14, 15. The animal serpent is degraded from the position to which he was entitled by his grace and beauty and his intelligence, and reduced to a wretched condition as a fugitive from the presence of man and animals, con- demned to hide from them and flee from their j)resence and their wrath.^ The strophe rises to the punishment of the evil spirit, which used the animal as his instrument. There is a prediction of a perpetual enmity not only between the woman and the serpent, but between the entire race and descendants of the woman and the serpent. This enmity involves a perpetual conflict, in which injury is wrought on both sides. The wounds inflicted by the serpent are in secret and in treachery, behiod the back of man and beneath his heel. But the wounds inflicted by man upon the serpent are openly upon his head, crushing him to death in the dust. The term seed is a generic term for the entire race of 1 See my article, " The Poem of the Fall of Mankind," in the Refonmd Quarterly Review^ April 1866. ^ li^n "l^rij by is thought by Keil and Delitzsch, after the older interpreters, to imply that the form of the serpent was changed ; that previously he had walked in the garden among the other animals, and now for the first was condemned to crawl in the dust. The phrase isy b^^s has also been interpreted to the effect that the serpent's food was the dust. But eating the dust is similar to the ])hrase biting the dust, and ini})lies nothing more thiin hving in the dust of the ground. The curse denounces a change of condition rather than of form. PEIMITIVE MESSIANIC IDEAS. 75 descendants of the woman on the one hand and the serjDent on the other. The seed of the serpent embraces all the evil race derived from him. This prediction points not merely to the whole family of snakes, but to the serpents of the higher world, the evil spirits, and to the serpents among mankind, the evil men, and seducers, called by Jesus the children of the devil,^ indeed all the forces of evil which array themselves against the children of God. The seed of the woman embraces the human race as such, that is, all who take part in the conflicts of the race with the forces of evil. There are those who by birthright belong to the seed of the woman who become by apostasy the children of the serpent. There are also those who are won as trophies of grace from the seed of the serpent and are adopted into the seed of redemption. These two great forces are in conflict throughout history. This enmity and conflict are to result in an eventual and final victory of man over the serpent. It is some- thing more than a mere dislike and hostility to snakes ; it is a conflict in which man is to bear a brave and hazardous part ; and the victory is one which is to over- come the vast injury wrought by the serpent in the temptation and fall of man. It is a victory which is a redemption from evil and sin, as the fall was a fall into sin and evil. We have then a blessing to the human race involved in this curse of the serpent ; a promise of redemption to be accomplished not by the woman, but by her seed. Her seed is the entire race of her descendants. But inasmuch as the serpent is represented as bruising the heel of the man, and is distinguished from his seed in God's direct address to him as thou, and the original tempter himself is thus to be the finally crushed and conquered foe, it seems to be necessary to think of the 1 John viii. 44. 76 MESSIANIC PKOPHECY. seed of the woman as culminating in an individual victor who is to be the champion of his race and gain the final victory over the serpent.^ This last conflict is to be a conflict in wdiich there will be no more deception of the woman ; but the son of the woman, a second Adam, will avenge his mother's shame and his father's dishonour, and retrieve the fortunes of his race by transforming death into victory.^ Thus we have in tliis fundamental prophecy explicitly a struggling, suffering, but finally victorious human race, ^ The unity of the seed is maintained in the demonstrative inD'' V^*ni has arisen by repetition of similar letters. - We change the text by transferring vn''S from the line where it is inappropriate to the sense and the structure of the line, to the line where it is really needed to supply the verb with an object and complete the line. We also change the meaningless "i^yo into 'V'^Z\ which seems to be needed by the context. We also think that "V^^ nt^'' rrm is a mistaken repetition of nC'"!'' DHi^ HMV 108 MESSIANIC PROPHECY. Strong is thy dwelling-place, And set in the rock thy nest : Nevertheless Kain will be for wasting ; How long ere Asshur cany thee away captive ? Alas ! who can live when ^El establishes it % But ships will come from the coast of Kittim And afflict Asshur and afflict Eber ; But he also will go on unto one ready to perish." — Num. XX iv. 20-24. Balaam unfolds the royal side of the relation of Israel to the nations, as the previous prophecy had unfolded rather the priestly side. The term sceptre is generic, and does not point to a monarch, but to Israel as the kingdom of God. The term star is synonymous with sceptre, and is fitting in the mouth of the semi-heathen prophet from the East, who was accustomed to find in the stars indications of future events, as his predecessors and successors in the Orient from the most ancient times. Thus the prophecy predicts that Israel, as the kingdom of God, will subdue the nations and destroy all enemies. The prominent nations of the prophet's time represent the hostile nations of all time, who are subdued in turn by the kingdom of God. The nations mentioned here are representative ones : those far and near in the range of the prophet's vision. They are the types and forerunners of all those nations who war against the Israel of God, as they are presented to us in later pro- phecy ; the enemies of this stadium of history being the advanced guard, the front line of an innumerable host, advancing in every epoch of history, until the final conflict with Gog and ^lagog at the end of the world (Rev. XX. 8 sq.). Explicitly the prophecy is generic, and refers to the kingdom of God as thus triumphant ; but implicitly it involves in the subsequent development of the idea the royal house of David, and his subjugation MESSIANIC PROPHECY OF THE MOSAIC AGE. 109 of the nations, and still further, the royal sceptre of David's greater son. rV. THE EVERLASTING PRIESTHOOD. § 37. Fhinehas receives the covenant of the everlasting priesthood of his seed as a reward of fidelity. When Israel appeared before Jahveh at Mount Horeb they received their Messianic calling with reference to the nations of the world, and a divine instruction to enable them to fulfil this calling and to mark them off from the other nations as a royal, priestly, consecrated people, the inheritance of God. This instruction was given in successive revelations from the theophany of the pillar of cloud and fire, unfolding and enlarging more and more as the. people were able to comprehend it. The fundamental instruction, according to the four narra- tives, was the ten words of the tables of stone, the tables of the covenant, the tables of the testimony, as they are variously called by the writers of the Pentateuch. This fundamental instruction was enlarged into a decalogue of worship, called the Little Book of the Covenant, by the prophetic narrative ; ^ into the twelve decalogues, which constitute the Greater Book of the Covenant of the theocratic narrator ;^ into the Book of Instruction of the Deuteronomist, and the sanctity code and priest code of the priestly narrator.^ These several codes all have passed through a series of later editings, which have enlarged and modified them in some respects, but they 1 Ex. xxxiv. 12-28. See my article, "Little Book of the Covenant," in The Hehreio Student, Chicago, May 1883. 2 Ex. XX. 22-xxiii. See my article, "Greater Book of the Covenant," in The Hebrew Student, June 1883. ' The sanctity code is in a body in Leviticus ; but the priest code is scattered through Exodus, Leviticus, and Numbers, accompanied with historical introductory statements. 110 MESSIANIC PROPHECY. give US essentially the divine instruction through the mediator Moses in varied modes of representation and forms of codification.'* The priestly narrator lays great stress upon the priest- hood and the sanctity of the religious institutions of Israel. God was enthroned in the most holy place, to which there was graded access by several ranks of priesthood, culminating in the great high priest. The single Messianic prophecy of the priestly narrator has the priesthood as its theme. The fortitude and fidelity of Phinehas earns him the promise. " Therefore say, Lo, I am going to give to him my covenant of peace ; and he and his seed after him will have the covenant of an everlasting priesthood, because that he was zealous for his God and made an atonement for the children of Israel." — Num. xxv, 12, 13. The priestly succession is here assigned to the line of Phinehas for ever. The Messianic feature is in the estabhshment of an everlasting priesthood. This is a generic prophecy which culminates in the everlasting priesthood of the Messiah, the great High Priest after the order of Melchizedek. And thus the priesthood of the nation has advanced to an everlasting order of priests in the nation. V. THE PROPHET LIKE MOSES. § 38. Moses predicts a propliet like himself, divinely authorized to speak, who will complete the divine instrii^ction and demand obedience under penalty of judgment. The four Messianic prophecies last considered are of one group, all unfolding some phase of the Abrahamic covenant. The stress for Abraham and Isaac was upon the 1 See my article, " A Critical Study of the History of the Higher Criticism, with Special Eeference to the Pentateuch," Presbyterian Review, iv. p. 74 seq. MESSIANIC PROPHECY OF THE MOSAIC AGE. Ill promised seed, for Jacob upon the promised land, for Israel as a whole upon their relation to the nations of the world ; at Sinai, when alone with their King and God, upon their priestly ministry of blessing ; on the mountains of Moab, when in conflict with the nations, upon their royal work of subjugating and reigning over them. The everlasting priesthood of Phinehas springs from the necessity of priestly mediation for Israel himself. These, with the protevangelium relating to the seed of the woman, are all of one common type ; they are all generic in character; they represent the future redemption as coming through the seed of the woman, the race of Shem, the seed of Abraham, the tribe of Judah, the kingdom of Israel, the priesthood of Phinehas. They do not explicitly point to an individual, although the individual Messiah is ever implicitly involved. The Messianic prophecy upon which we are now to reflect is of a different character and type. The Deuteronomist emphasizes the relation of love between Jahveh and His people. Jahveh has chosen Israel out from the nations to be His own people. He is Jahveh their God. As Moses said unto Israel — " Only to your fathers Jahveh did cleave, to love them, and chose their seed after them, even you above aU the peoples " — I)eut. x. 16. The Deuteronomist represents Moses as saying in the midst of his discourse — " According to all that thou didst ask from Jahveh thy God in Horeb, in the day of the assembly, saying, ' I cannot again hear the voice of Jahveh, my God, and this great fire I cannot see again, lest I die.' And Jahveh said unto me, ' They have done well in what they have spoken. A prophet will I raise up for them, from the midst of their brethren, like thee ; and will give my words in his mouth, and he will speak unto them all that I charge him. And it will come to pass that whosoever will not hearken unto my words which he will speak in my name, I will require it of him.' " — Deut. xviii. 16-19. 112 MESSIANIC PROPHECY. Moses humbly recognizes the incompleteness of his work, while he projects the divine instruction into the future, and sees its completion in another prophet like him, yet his superior in authority and dignity, who is to be the prophetic mediator between Jahveh and His royal people, who is to take up the instruction as Moses left it, and unfold it in still more significant relations.^ The work of this prophet is to declare the whole word of God with authority, demanding obedience under the penalty of the divine judgment. The very fact that the prophet is like Moses involves in that resemblance a ministry like that of Moses, and, indeed, a ministry of instruction and revelation of the word of God. And in 1 The interpretation depends primarily upon the signification of ^5"»2^ Is it a collective or a simple singular ? Does it refer to the prophetic order, or an individual prophet ? The Jewish commen- tators and most recent interpreters regard it as a collective and generic term. There is much in favour of this view. The context speaks of the priests and Levites as a class, and the false prophets and heathen magicians as classes. Again, unless this passage be interpreted as referring to the order of prophets, there is no passage in the Pentateuch that recognizes or authorizes later prophecy. Furthermore, all previous Messianic prophecy is generic, and the first prophecy of the next period is also generic. We should expect such an one here. But there is insufficient authority for taking j^^aj as collective. The Samaritans base their Messianic hopes on this passage, rejecting all later prophecy, and interpret it as refer- ring to a Messianic prophet. The context is also in favour of an individual prophet; for the prophet is not only represented as coming forth from Israel, but is also compared with Moses, and thus presumptively he is an individual likewise. It is true that the Mosaic instruction makes no provision for an order of prophets. But it is not necessary that it should do so. Later prophecy does not depend on the Pentateuch for its authority, but upon God Him- self, who called the ])rophets immediately and sent them forth as He did Moses. The reign of Jahveh, the King of Israel, was immediate and continuous over His people. The priest code pre- scribed an order of priests, but nothing further. Jahveh, the theocratic King, reigned over the people, and He commissioned whom He would to speak and act for Him ; and herein was the guarantee for the perpetuity and unfolding of divine revelation. It was necessary that the priestly organization of the people should be always complete ; for their communion with their God must be MESSIANIC PROPHECY OF THE MOSAIC AGE. 113 that the instruction and revelation of Moses is the word of God that liveth and abideth for ever, it is involved that the instruction and revelation of that prophet will not be in antagonism with that of Moses, but a further unfolding and completing of it. We have already re- marked that the instruction of Moses was not delivered once for all in a complete and organized form ; but successively in the unfolding of the primitive germ in the tables ; and that presumptively it had not reached its end and goal, but was still in an incomplete condition. The prophecy that we are studying predicts the prophet who is to carry that development on to its end, and bring the revelation to its completion. Indeed, the entire legislation of the continuous and unbroken. But it was not necessary that there should be an unbroken and continuous unfokling of divine revela- tion. God made new revelations of His will as the people were trained by the older revelation to receive them ; so that in some cases development was rapid, in other cases tardy. It was not even necessary that the royal organization of the people should be always . complete and unbroken. The princes of the tribes as the represen- tatives of Jahveh communed with their King through the Urim and Thu7nmim ; only on critical occasions was a princely mediator required, and he was always called forth by Jahveh when needed. The divine Spirit came upon such men as Joshua and Gideon, and they led the people and delivered them from their enemies. The prophetic ministry was fulfilled as a rule through the instructions, written or unwritten, in the hands of the people. It was only when these needed unfolding that Jahveh summoned a prophet to reveal His wiU, to increase and enlarge the material of the divine revelation. And hence no official prophet appeared in Israel until Samuel, the last of the D'DDK^, and the father of a new era. The prophetic office of Moses was not transmitted to his successors. And hence there was nothing in the historical or psychological experience of Moses to incline him to predict an order of prophets. The very fact of the distinction between his own ministry and that of the Levitical priesthood in this particular would incline him to look for one summoned directly by Jahveh like himself, without predecessors or successors. Thus, in accordance with the general principle of prophecy, he sees the Messianic end in which the divine instruction left incomplete by himself will be completed by a prophet greater than himself ; but he does not see all the interven- ing steps to that end. He sees only that first stadium in which false prophets and magicians appear to mislead the people. H 114 MESSIANIC PROPHECY. Pentateuch is predictive in character, looking forward with Moses to its completion and fulfilment in the prophet greater than Moses. The ten words of the tables are the germ, the fundamental instruction ; but even these are capable of improvement, and do improve in the ethical development of the religion of Israel. And the same is true of the Little Book of the Covenant of the prophetic narrator and the Greater Book of the Covenant of the theocratic narrator, the Deuteronomic code, and the sanctity code and priest code of the priestly narrator ; for the subsequent revelation of the psalmists and prophets give the worship of the people and their civil and social life an ever advancing development — all tending to their completion in the prophet who was to come, the second Moses. . The characteristics of the prophet predicted are thus : "(1) that he is to be an Israelite, (2) that he is to be like Moses, (3) that he is to be authorized to declare the whole word of God with authority. There is no prophet in Jewish history who at all satisfies these conditions. None can compare with Moses, or be said to stand as his superior in completing his revelation ; none in the history of Israel until the advent of Jesus Christ.'^ ^ This John the Baptist recognized when he cried, saying, " This was He of whom I said, He that cometh after me is preferred before me : for He was before me. . . . For the law was given through Moses, but grace and truth came through Jesus Christ. No one hath seen God at any time ; the only-begotten Son, which is in the bosom of the Father, He hath declared' Him " (John i. 15-18). Philip after he had found Jesus said to Nathanael, " We have found Him of whom Moses in the law and the prophets did write " (John i. 45). The Samaritan woman recognized Jesus as the Messiah, the prophet (John iv. 29). The multitude on the sea of Galilee exclaimed, " This is truly the prophet that should come into the world " (John vi. 14), Jesus tells the Pharisee, " For had ye believed Moses, ye would have believed me ; for he wrote of me. But if ye believe not his writings, how shall ye believe my words ? " (John v. 46, 47). The Pharisees accused Jesus of violating the law and wishing to do away with the religion of Moses, but He said, " I came not to destroy the law or MESSIANIC PROPHECY OF THE MOSAIC AGE. 115 VI. THE BLESSING AND THE CUESE. § 39. The doctrine of divine judgment springs from the divine instruction in the several codes, and the Uessings and curses attached thereto as their sanction. The four narrators of the Pentateuch give us four different representations of the divine judgment, each in accordance with the nature of his code. The simplest representation is appended to the greater book of the covenant.^ The representation of the prophetic narrator is not connected with his code, — the little book of the covenant,^ — but is in the song of Moses.^ The Deutero- nomist gives a solemn enumeration of the blessings and curses in connection with his code.* The priest code gives its sanction at the close of the sanctity code.* We shall first consider the blessings beginning with the covenant code. " If ye will serve Jahveh your God, he will bless thy bread and thy water, and I will remove sickness from thy midst. There shall the prophets, but to fulfil" (Matt. v. 12). The apostles likewise \ represent Jesus as the prophet like Moses. Thus Peter in his address in the temple quotes our prophecy, and applies it to Jesus (Acts iii. 22-26) ; Stephen also (Acts vii. 37). Paul represents Christ as the end of the law for righteousness, that is, its culminating end (Rom. x. 4) ; so also the law as the pedagogue leading to Christ (Gal. iii. 24). The Epistle to the Hebrews represents Jesus as the Mediator of the New Covenant of which the Old Covenant through Moses was the shadow and type. The resemblance to His brethren was that they might not be brought face to face with God. Hence Jesus was made like His brethren (Heb. ii. 17), in order that He might sympathize with them and save them. The resemblance of Jesns to Moses, and His superiority, is well carried out in Heb. iii. Jesus is compared with Moses in faithfulness in all his house, and yet is counted worthy of more glory than Moses, inasmuch as he who hath built the house, the Church, hath more honour than the house, to which even Moses belonged, Moses being but a servant, Christ being the Son. Hence the application of the third thought of our prophecy in the warning not to harden the heart against Christ, as Israel had hardened their hearts against Moses. 1 Ex. xxiii. 20-33. * Ex. xxxiv. 12-28. * Deut. xxxii. * Deut. xxvii.-xxviii. '^ Lev. xxvi. 116 MESSIANIC PROPHECY. not be one failing of her young or barren in thy land ; the number of thy (lays will I fultil. My terror will I send before thee, and I will discomfit all the people among whom you w^ill come. . . . And I will make thy boundary from the Red Sea even to the sea of the Philistines, and from the wilderness unto the Eiver ; for I will give into your hand the inhabitants of the land, and thou wilt drive them from thy presence." — Ex. xxiii. 25-31. The song of Moses describes the blessings of the land of promise, and expresses regret that they could not be fulfilled. *' If they were wise, they would understand this, They would discern their end : How would one pursue a thousand, And two put a myriad to flight." — Deut. xxxii. 29, 30. The Deuteronomist enlarges upon the blessings of obedience. " Blessed wilt thou be in the city, and blessed wilt thou be in the field. Blessed will be the fruit of thy body, and the fruit of thy ground, and the fruit of thy cattle, the increase of thy kine, and the young of thy flock. Blessed will be thy basket and thy kneading trough. Blessed wilt thou be when thou comest in, and blessed w^ilt thou be when thou goest out. Jaliveh will cause thine enemies that rise up against thee to be smitten before thee ; they w^ill come out against thee by one way, and will flee before thee by seven ways. . , . Jahveh will open unto thee his good treasure, the heaven, to give the rain of thy land in its season, and to bless all the work of thine hand : and thou wilt lend unto many nations, and thou wilt not borrow. And Jahveh will make thee the head and not the tail ; and thou wilt be above only, and thou wilt not be beneath." — Deut. xxviii. 3-13. The blessing of the sanctity code is not so elaborate as the rhetorical form in Deuteronomy, but it is more comprehensive. " If in my statutes ye walk, and my commandments ye kee]3 and do them, I will give your rains in their season, and the land will give its produce, and the trees of the field will yield their fruit. And the threshing will reach for you the vintage, and the vintage wiU reach MESSIANIC PROPHECY OF THE MOSAIC AGE. Il7 the planting, and ye will eat your bread to the full and dwell in con- fidence in your land. And I will give peace in the land, and ye will lie down and there will be none to affright ; and I will cause the evil animal to cease from the land, and the sword will not pass through your land ; and ye will pursue your enemies, and they will fall before you by the sword, and five of you will pursue a hundred, and a hundred of you will pursue a myriad ; and your enemies will fall before you by the sword. And I will turn unto you, and make you fruitful, and multiply you, and establish my covenant with you, and ye will eat old store, and bring forth the old because of the new. And I will put my tabernacle in your midst, and my soul will not abhor you, and I will walk about in your midst, and become your God, and ye will become my people."— Lev. xxvi. 3-12. These blessings of the covenant are the ideals of the prophets, and they recur one after another in the later prophecies of the Psalter and the prophets. They are based upon the blessings of the patriarch Jacob.^ The curses of the Mosaic codes are also the basis of the predictions of divine judgment that constitute one of the most significant features of prophecy. The book of the covenant is meagi-e here. The people are warned not to rebel against the theophanic Malakh, lest he should not forgive their transgression.^ The song of Moses is elaborate here, and lays the basis of the doctrine of the divine judgment. " And he said, I will hide my face from them, I will see what their end will be : For they are a very froward generation, Children in whom there is no faith. They have moved me to jealousy with that which is not God ; They have provoked me to anger with their vanities ; And I will move them to jealousy with those which are not a people ; I will provoke them to anger with a foolish nation. When a fire is kindled in mine anger, It doth burn unto Sheol beneath ; And devour the earth with her increase, And lick up the foundations of the mountains. Gen. xlix. * Ex. xxiii. 21. 118 MESSIANIC PEOPHECY. I will heap mischiefs upon them ; I will sj^end mine arrows against them ; They will be wasted with hunger, and devoured with burning heat And bitter destruction ; And the teeth of beasts will I send upon them, With the poison of crawling things of the dust. "Without the sword will bereave, And within the chambers terror ; Both young men and virgins, The suckling with the man of grey hairs. Verily I lift up my hand to heaven, And say, as I live for ever ; If I have whetted my sword, the lightning. That mine hand may take hold on judgment ; I will render vengeance to my adversaries, And recompense them that hate me ; I will make mine arrows drunk with blood, And my sword will devour flesh ; Of the blood of the slain and the captives. Of the chief of the leaders of the enemy." — Deut. xxxii. 20-42. The Deuteronomist enlarges upon the curses, both in the specification of the transgressions that are cursed and of the curses themselves, concluding with the general prediction. " And it will come to pass, that as Jahveh rejoiced over you to do you good, and to multiply you, so Jahveh will rejoice over you to cause you to perish, and to destroy you ; and you will be plucked from off the land whither thou goest in to possess it. And Jahveh will scatter thee among all peoples, from the one end of the earth even unto the other end of the earth ; and there thou wilt serve other gods, which thou hast not known, thou nor thy fathers, even wood and stone. And among these nations wilt thou find no ease, and there will be no rest for the sole of thy foot ; but Jahveh will give thee there a trembling heart, and failing of eyes, and pining of soul : and thy life will hang in doubt before thee ; and thou wilt fear night and day, and wilt have none assurance of thy life : in the morning thou wilt say. Would God it were even ! and at even thou wilt say, Would God it were morning ! for the fear of thine heart which thou wilt fear, MESSIANIC PEOPHECY OF THE MOSAIC AGE. 119 and for the sight of thine eyes which thou wilt see. And Jahveh will bring thee into Egypt again with ships, by the way whereof I said unto thee, Thcai shalt see it no more again : and there ye will sell yourselves unto your enemies for bondmen and for bond- women, and no man will buy you." — Deut. xxviii. 63-68. The curses of the sanctity code are given in Leviticus. We give the most significant of them, omitting the pro- tases of the conditional clauses, all of which imply transgression of the code. " I also will do this unto you, and appoint terror over you, con- sumption and fever that will consume the eyes, and make the soul to pine away : and ye will sow your seed in vain, and your enemies will eat it ; and I will set my face against you, and ye will be smitten before your enemies : and they that hate you will rule over you ; and ye will flee when none pursueth you. . . . And I will break the pride of your power ; and make your heaven as iron, and your earth as brass : and your strength will be spent in vain ; and your land will not yield her increase, and the trees of the land will not yield their fruit. . . . And I will send the animal of the field against you, and it will rob you of your children, and destroy your cattle, and make you few in number ; and your ways will become desolate. . . . And I will bring a sword upon you that will exe- cute the vengeance of the covenant ; and ye will be gathered together unto your cities. And I will send pestilence among you ; and ye will be delivered into the hand of the enemy. . . . And ye will eat the flesh of your sons, and the flesh of your daughters will ye eat. . . . And I will make your cities a waste, and bring your sanctuaries unto desolation, and I will not smell your odour of gratification. And I will bring the land into desolation : and your enemies which dwell therein will be astonished at it. And you will I scatter among the nations, and draw out the sword after you : and your land will be a desolation, and your cities will be a waste. Then will the land enjoy her Sabbaths, as long as it lieth desolate, and ye be in your enemies' land. . . . And yet for all that, when they be in the land of their enemies, I will not reject them, neither will I abhor them, to destroy them utterly, and to break my covenant with them : for I am Jahveh their God ; but I will for their sakes remember the covenant of their ancestors, whom I brought forth out of the land of Egypt in the sight of the nations, that I might be their God : I am Jahveh."— Lev. xxvi. 16-45. 120 MESSIAXIC PROPHECY. Before entering upon another period it is requisite that we should gather into a higher generalization the results thus far attained. There are several Messianic prophecies in the Pentateuch which may be grouped under four heads : the Adamic, Noachic, Abrahamic, and Mosaic, for the fourth, fifth, and sixth are but the further unfolding of the third. There are two lines of Messianic prophecy, the human and the divine ; the human, the culminating head of the woman's seed, who gains the victory over the serpent ; the divine, the descent of Jahveh to dwell in the tents of Shem, to bestow blessings upon the faithful and judgments upon His enemies. There are two channels of blessing, the seed of Abraham and the land of Canaan ; the seed of Abraham through the lion of the tribe of Judah, the land of Canaan as the inheritance of the tribes of Israel. The universal in- heritance of mankind is mediated by the central inherit- ance of Israel. There are two phases of blessing, the ministry of a holy, priestly, and royal people, the son of God ; and the sovereignty of a victorious kingdom of God. There is a second Moses, whose prophetic ministry will complete the revelation of God, and an everlasting faithful priesthood for the people of God. Now these are the great outlines of Messianic pro- phecy, the broad foundations upon which all later pro- phecy is built. These are separated for the most part widely from one another ; they do not harmonize as yet, but they unfold each by itself, approximating to its fellows, developing new lines into which they depart; but all centre at last in the Messiah at His first or second advent. Like the stars, they relieve the darkness of the olden time, receiving constant additions to their number until they all at last are absorbed in the dawning sun of redemption. CHAPTER V. THE MESSIANIC IDEA IN THE DAVIDIC PERIOD. The period of the Judges was ill adapted for the develop- ment of the Messianic idea. The conquest of the Holy Land and the settlement of the tribes in the midst of tlie conquered Canaanites whom they had failed to drive out, resulted in breaking up the national unity, in lowering the spiritual tone through the influence of the people of the land, and in decay of the religious life of the nation. It had been impossible to observe any of the Mosaic codes during the wandering in the wilderness. It was also impossible to realize the Mosaic ideal during the period of the Judges. An effort was made after crossing the Jordan to advance in religious life by observance of circumcision and the passover ; but little progress was made beyond the simplest requirements of the code of the covenant. For several centuries Israel remained in a disorganized condition. But Jahveh did not forsake them. He sent His Spirit upon heroic men to deliver His people from their enemies and bring them back to their allegiance to Himself. There was a long succession of disastrous defeats and of marvellous victories. The enemies of Israel were gradually worn out, and Israel was more firmly established in the land. The period of the Judges closes with no important enemy save the Philistines, who had attained a pre-eminence in Palestine greater than that of any of the hostile nations which preceded them in the oppression of Israel. At this time 121 122 MESSIANIC PKOPHECY. Eli was the presiding priest at Shiloh, and liis two sons, Hophni and Phinehas, ministered as his assistants ; but with such impiety, that they dishonoured the worship of Jahveh and brought ruin on their father's house. The deep-seated corruption of the sons of Eli is the occasion of a prediction which, while it concerns chiefly the house of Eli and the succession in the priesthood, also points to the Messianic end, as it gives direction to the pre- diction of the everlasting priesthood in the line of the faithful Phinehas. I. THE FAITHFUL PRIESTHOOD. § 40. A faithful priesthood ivill take tJie place of the unfaithful li7ie of Eli, and ininister hefore an anointed king for ever. An unnamed man of God comes to Eli with the following prophecy. " And T will raise me up a faithful priest. According to that which is in my heart and in my souP will he do. An d I will build him a faithful ^ house, And he will walk before mine anointed ^ always. And it will come to pass, that all that are left in thine house Will come to bow down to him for a piece of silver,'' And will say, Put me, I pray thee, into one of the priest's offices, That I may eat a morsel of bread." —1 Sam. ii. 35, 36. » "'C'S^ni '•ZIdSi are rendered by the Ke vised Version, "in my heart and in my mind." But nni?, in usage, is associated with the mind, and C'DJ is more closely connected with the emotional nature. 2 The Revised Version rendei-s |DXJ nU, a sure house. But it is more consistent to give the same meaning to |DN3 here as with jONJ jnD above. 3 This is one of a number of passages that indicate that a king- was in the mind of Israel Jis an ideal longing from the beginning. The disorganization of the nation, the independence and rivalries of the tribes, prevented the realization of the ideal of Deut. x^^i. 14-20 until the time of Saul and David. « The Ma&soretic text adds urb 1331, but this is not in the LXX. ; THE MESSIANIC IDEA IN THE DAVIDIC PERIOD. 123 This prediction removes the eldership and presidency in the priesthood from the line of Eli to another line which is not here designated. It is a narrowing of the elective grace of God with reference to the everlasting priesthood promised to Phinehas.^ A faithful priest and a faithful house will be raised up instead of the unfaithful Eli and his house. To this faithful priesthood the family of Eli will do homage, as the brother of Jacob did homage to him.^ The chief difficulty in this piece is the statement that this faithful priest will " walk before mine anointed." The anointed cannot then be the anointed priest, but must be another anointed one, namely a king. This then involves the conception of a royal dynasty with whom the Messianic priest would be in faithful association. There is a transition from priest to priestly house, so that the prediction is generic. n. THE ALL-KNOWING JUDGE. § 41. Jahveh is the all-hnowing Judge. He espouses the cause of the weak and executes justice. He judges the whole earthy and will exalt the king of Israel. Jahveh was preparing Israel for a new era in his history. The pious Hannah was chosen as the mother of the prophet who was to introduce the Davidic age. Hannah, like Sarah of old, bursts forth in a song of praise inspired by the prophetic spirit in view of the gift of her son to her by God and her devotion of her son to God. She rises to the conception of the all-knowing Judge, and sings the praise of Jahveh in a song which is re-echoed through all subsequent prophecy, and especially in the it disturbs the rhythm, makes the line too long, and is a premature statement of that which comes appropriately in the climax of the last line. ^ Num. XXV. 12, 13. ^ Gen. xxvii. 29. 124 MESSIANIC PEOPHECY. song of the blessed Virgin, the mother of the Messiak The song is a \d\dd description of the new era, in which the all-knowing Jahveh weighs the actions of men, and equitably readjusts the inequalities of human life. I. " Then Hannah prayed and said, My heart doth exult in Jahveh, My horn ^ is exalted in Jahveh, My mouth is enlarged '^ over mine enemies, Yea, I rejoi€e in thy salvation. i There is none holy like Jahveh, i Yea, there is none beside thee, And there is no rock like our God. n. Speak no more proudly,^ Let not bold words issue from your mouth ; \ For an all-knowing ^ God is Jahveh, And by him ^ are deeds weighed. Heroes of the bow are broken,^ But stumblers gird on valour ; The full for bread hire themselves, But the hungry keep holiday for ever ; ' The barren doth bear seven, But the one having many children doth languish. ^ Tlie horn is the s}Tubol of strength and dignity (Pss. Ixxxix. 2-4, cxii, 9, cxxxii. 17). ^ The widening of the mouth is a gesture of laughter and joy (Ps. cxxvi. 2 ; Isa. Ix. 5). ' The iMassoretic text repeats T\T\2'y \ but it is without force, and destroys the rhythm. * niyT 7N. The abstract plural should be rendered " all-knowing." 5 The Qeri i^) is better than the Kethihh ^^. ^ 0^33 nL*'p. Tlie construct has the force of combining the two nouns into a compound like the English hmcnien. ^ The Massoretic text connects ly with the next line. But it gives no good sense there, and it leaves the one line too short, and makes tlie other too long. The LXX. has another reading which does not satisfy. Bottcher and Thenius would read p2Vi*, and render " cease from labour." This gives an appropriate thought. But it is easier to render ^]} " for ever," and attach it to the previous line. Thia gives an appropriate contrast. THE ^rESSIANTC IDEA IN THE DAVIDIC PERIOD. 125 m. Jahveh kill?, and he quickens, He brings dovni to Sheol, and he doth Vjiing up ; ^ Jahveh dLsinherits, and he enriches, He humbles, yea, he lifts up on high ; He ralseth up from the dust the weak, From the dunghill he exalts the poor, To enthrone ^ him with nobles. That he mar give him a throne of glory a3 an inheritance ; For Jahveh's are the pillars of earth. And he set upon them the world. rV. The feet of hLs favoured ones he guards, But the wicked in darkness are silenced ; For not by power can a man prevail.^ Let Jahveh's adversaries be frightened, Over them in heaven may he thunder,* Jahveh judgeth the ends of earth, In order to give strength ^ to his king, In order to exalt the horn of Ms anointed." —1 Sam. ii. 1-10. The reign of Jahveli in judgment has in view the exaltation of a king in Israel. These predictions of a royal dynasty in Israel advanced toward realization through Samuel, who becomes at first a prophet like Moses, and the founder of the prophetic order, then is called to the judgeship, and finally transfers his political authority to the king, in order to be above all things and alone the pjrophet of J'^ ^ The children of Israel were impelled by the cii-„_-... .nces in which they were placed to yearn for a king and a dynasty, and the national unity which this involved. The capture of the ^ There is an abrupt change by the 1 con-sec. which may be expressed by the English emphatic present, * ilhny is a final clause. ® There is a play upon the noun ~2; in the verb 12:'- * The text of the LXX. reads r.~' for in"' and rhj for "i^y, and in maLy M.SS. inseits several lines from the text of Jer. ix, 23, 24. These have crept in from the margin. The rhythm and strophical organization are to be found only in the Hebrew text. * |n^1 and DH^i are final clau-ses. 126 MESSIANIC PROPHECY. ark and the destruction of Shiloh brought this to the focus of a popular demand. The demand assumed the form of rebellion against Samuel and against Jahveh, whom Samuel represented ; because it was really the demand for a permanent dynasty which would prevent the direct calling of the individual by God ; but it was in the line of the Mosaic ideal and of the divine purpose, although it was premature on the part of the people. The reign of Saul was a temporary provision, which showed how premature the establishment of the kingdom had been. The reign of Saul was a transition from the old order of things to the new. Though Saul was the king, Samuel remained the master of political as well as religious affairs. First with the anointing of David and his establish- ment on the throne of Zion, first after the removal of the ark thither, and the establishment of the religious and political unity of the nation in Jerusalem, did Messianic prophecy make a new advance. III. THE COVENANT WITH DAVID. § 42. Jahveh adcypts the seed of David as His Son, whom He will chastise hy human agents for sin, hit will never forsake. He ^promises to build David's seed into an everlasting dynasty, and that He will dwell in the house to he erected hy it in His honour. The occasion of the covenant with David was the desire of David to build a house to Jahveh in Jerusalem. This desire was rewarded with a promise which tran- scends all previous predictions in its unfolding of the Messianic idea. Nathan the prophet came to David with the prediction which in its Messianic part is as follows -} — ^ There are two versions of the prediction, the one in 2 Sam. vii. 11-16, the other in 1 Chron. xvii. 10-14. We give "what seems THE MESSIANIC IDEA IN THE DAVIDIC PERIOD. 12*7 " Therefore Jahveh dotli tell tliee,i That Jahveh will make ^ thee a house, And it will come to pass when thy days will be fulfilled,* And thou wilt lie down * with thy fathers, I will raise up thy seed after thee, Him who will issue from thy bowels.* I will establish his kingdom. He will build a house to my name,^ And I will establish his throne for ever.'^ I will become a father to him. And he will become a son to me ; "Whom when he acts perversely I will chastise ^ With rods of men and with blows of the sons of men ; But my mercy I will not remove from him,^ According as I removed it from him who was before theej^** to us to be the original text, so far as we can determine it from a comparison of these versions. The prediction is a poem with the trimeter movement. ^ The chronicler omits riin\ and changes ^^jini into ^"^^ii,). The rhythm is preserved in Samuel. 2 The chronicler uses njl"' for n^]}\ and "'iD for •). The less precise text of Samuel is to be preferred. 8 The chronicler reads IN^O ""IJ n\Tl for ix^D'' ^D. Here the LXX. of Samuel agrees with the chronicler, and his text is better save that the imperfect tense is to be preferred. * The chronicler has DV Dd!?^ for r\i< n^DC^V The syntactical construction and the archaic expression of Samuel are to be pre- ferred. fi The chronicler has ']>JD0 n\T' for y])^^ n:;\ The LXX. of Samuel reads n'TT'. This is less precise, and is better ; but I'lyiDD is simpler and more archaic. ^ The chronicler has ""^ for ijOK^!?. The text of Samuel is more archaic. ^ The text of Samuel omits the suffix of 1XD5 and inserts in^fetD. But this insertion is not in the LXX. of Samuel, and it makes the line too long. The chronicler is to be preferred. ^ Lines 11 and 12 are not given by the chronicler. But there is no sufficient reason to doubt their originality. * The chronicler reads ""DyD ^"'D^^, which is supported by the LXX. of Samuel, and is better than 13^)0 11D''. ^^ The chronicler is better here. The mention of Saul by name in Samuel is too close for the original poem, and is more like subse- quent reflection and explanation. 128 MESSIANIC PROPHECY. And thy house will be made firm for ever,i Thy ^ throne will be established for ever." —2 Sam. vii. 11-16 ; 1 Chron. xvii. 10-14 There are three elements in this prediction — (1) The everlasting reign of the house of David ; (2) the erection of the house of Jahveh by the seed of David ; (3) the exaltation of the seed of David to the rank of sonship with God, with paternal discipline on account of sin, and with everlasting mercy. These three elements are the basis of the Messianic idea throughout subsequent prophecy. They unfold the previous predictions of redemption. 1. The prediction of Balaam, of a sceptre and star arising out of Jacob, is now to be unfolded in the sceptre of David's line. Jacob's prediction of the lion of the tribe of Judah, who conquers peace and prosperity and gains possession of all that belongs to him, is advanced in the lion of Bethlehem, and prefigured in the victories of his brilliant reign. The throne of David rises higher than the sceptre of Jacob and the conquering chieftain of Judah — it enlarges the scope of the prediction, and fills it with grander conceptions. The prophecy is still generic. The kingdom of Israel, the tribe of Judah, is narrowed into the seed of David. The seed of David assumes the place and significance of the seed of the woman and the seed of Abraham. 2. The erection of the house of Jahveh is the further unfolding of the blessing of Shem. Jahveh is not only to dwell in the tents of Shem, in the midst of the tribes of Israel, as their King and their God, but He is to take 1 The text of Samuel 'Tjn''l pSil is to be preferred to the chron- icler's Tl'^m inTnDjn- But both texts insert nJ?JDD without sufii- cient reasons. It seems to be explanatory. Samuel appends y^p?, which is not in the chronicler, and seems to have arisen by repetition from the previous line. ^ The chronicler incorrectly uses the third person of the suffix for the second person. THE MESSIANIC IDEA IN THE DAVIDIC PERIOD. 129 up His abode in Jerusalem, in a temple to be erected by the seed of David. There is no explicit reference to Solomon as the builder of the temple, but to the seed of David in general. The temple of Jahveh is to be an everlasting temple, and the seed of David as a whole is to have the care of that temple, which is conceived of in the prediction in its culmination, and not merely in the temple erected by Solomon. The temple of Solomon was the historical movement toward a realization of the prediction ; it was not the accomplishment of the ideal of the prediction, for that ideal was some- thing higher and more glorious than the temple of Solomon. 3. The highest feature of the prediction of ISTathan is, however, in the relation of sonship thereby established. Israel at the exodus had been taken up into the relation of sonship to Jahveh. Jsrael was His son. His first- born. Now this relation of sonship is applied to David and his seed in a peculiar and higher sense. This relation of sonship involves two special phases — chas- tisement and mercy. The chastisement is on account of sin, and in order to its removal. This feature is omitted by the chronicler. It is chastisement by paternal love, — it is by the use of men of high and low degree. But it is a chastisement of redemption. The mercy of God, His paternal mercy, is everlasting ; it will never depart from David and his seed as it had departed from Saul. The conception of the suffering seed of the prot- evangelium is now advanced to a higher stage — the suffering is not here through the temptations and assaults of the evil one, the serpent, but through the chastise- ment of paternal love. The affliction comes through evil men who render the supremacy and the victory difficult and hazardous, but cannot stay it or prevent its ultimate realization. For over above aU this affliction is I 130 MESSIANIC PEOPHECY. the hand of the Father God who uses these wicked men as the rods of His chastening love. The prediction has been rashly interpreted as referring to Solomon. But Solomon is only the herald of its realization, like David himself. Solomon by his historical transactions points the way to the ultimate realization in the Messiah, who pursued the way of suffering to gain the glories of redemption, who suffered the chastise- ments of His Father God for the redemption of the race. It is true we cannot refer the committing iniquity, the acting perversely, to Him as a person. But none of the features of the prediction refer to Him directly as a person. The prediction throughout is generic. It finds its realization in him as the culmination of David's line. The dynasty of David is an everlasting dynasty. It continues from David onward to reign over Israel, but it is only in Jesus Christ that it really becomes an eternal throne. The dynasty of David is the builder of the house of Jahveh, beginning with Solomon and continuing through the noble monarchs of that line to care for the temple of their God ; they rebuild it under Zerubbabel, but it is not until Jesus Christ erected the temple of humanity in heaven at the right hand of God that the prediction attained its ideal. The paternal mercy and chastisement were realized in the history of the Davidic dynasty, but that mercy was first made sure for ever in the suffering of Jesus Christ when He was chastised, not for His own sins, but for the sins of the Davidic dynasty, of Israel and the world. In the pro- phecy of Nathan the predictions of the Pentateuch are transformed into new ideals to constitute the basis of Messianic predictions in the future. The Davidic covenant is the embodiment of the hope of David and the theme of his last meditations. The prophetic historian, the author of the Books of Samuel, THE MESSIANIC IDEA IN THE DA VI DIG PERIOD. 131 has preserved the last words of the sweet singer of Israel in the following beautiful poem : — I. " Utterance ^ of the man whom the Most High ^ has raised up. The Spirit of Jahveh speaks in me, And his word is upon my tongue. The God of Israel doth say to me, The Eock of Israel doth speak. II. A ruler over men — righteous : A ruler in the fear of God, Yea, he is like the morning light when the sun rises, A morning without clouds, Fromshiniug, from rain, tender grass sprouts from the earth. III. Is not thus my house with ^El ? For an everlasting covenant hath he made with me, Arranged in all things, and secured, Yea, all my salvation and every delight, "Will he not cause it to sprout 1 IV. But the worthless, all of them are thrust away ' like thorns ; For they cannot be taken with the hand ; The man touching them Must be armed with iron and the spear's staff; And they will be utterly * consumed with fire." — 2 Sam. xxiii. 1-7. ^ The editor has enlarged the first strophe by dwelling upon the character of David as the anointed of God ; thus — " Anointed of the God of Jacob, Sweet in the songs of Israel." ^ pj;, according to Gesenius, is an adverb = on high, highly, but it is only here in this sense. The Vulgate renders ^y as a pre- position, de Christo. It is better to take ^]i as a shortened form of ]\'hv^ as in Hos. ii. 7, vii. 16, and to follow the LXX. 6u dviarmnf &i6;, and point the verb Dpn. 2 njp is Hoph. part. : only here from y\^ = shake out, thrust away, or from inj = Jlap wings and fleCy and thus chased away. *I3p is used in Job xx. 8. • ^ T\2'^li = in their dwelling, from 2l^i. But the LXX. reads DK^'sa by transposition of letters, and the Vulgate icsque ad 7iihiiumy reading nntJ*, cessation, from n2^. 132 MESSIANIC PROPHECY. In this swan - song David clings to the Messianic promise as his greatest delight. He pictures the righteous, God-fearing ruler shining forth like the dawn and spring- ing up like the tender grass after a shower. He expresses his confidence in the firm, sure and everlasting covenant of God, that He will cause all his salvation and delight to spring up in due time, and that He will utterly destroy all the wicked adversaries. The life and experience of David and Solomon his son become the typical frames of the Messianic idea, as they fill up the outlines of the prediction of Nathan. It matters little whether these are presented to us in the words of David or Solomon, or of some other poet of their circle or age. That David or Solomon is their theme, and their experience the Messianic type, justifies us in treating them together. IV. THE CONQUEPJNG KING. § 43. Psalm GX. cites an utterance and oath of Jahvch to the Messiah, enthroning him at his right hand as the friest-king after the order of Melchizedek. He then stands at his right hand as he goes forth at the head of a i^riestly army to the conquest of the nations. The 110th Psalm is in the form of an utterance from Jahveh respecting the son of David. It is therefore a prediction that unfolds the prediction of Nathan. It is composed of two strophes of six pentameter lines each. I. " Utterance of Jahveh to my Lord ; ^ 'sit enthroned at my right hand Till I make thine enemies a stool for thy feet ; ' ^ "'J1i<^- The Psalmist recognizes the recipient of the utterance of Jahveh as his Lord and Sovereign. The utterance was made directly to him ; as in Ps. ii., the Messiah himself cites a decree of Jahveh. THE MESSIANIC IDEA IN THE DAVIDIC PERIOD. 133 The rod of thy strength Jahveh sendeth out of Zion : Rule in the midst of thine enemies.^ Thy people are volunteers ^ in the day of thy host, in beauty of holiness. From the womb of the morning thou hast the dew of thy young men.^ 3 II. Jahveh hath sworn, and he will not be sorry, ' Thou art a priest for ever after the order of Melchizedek.' The Lord on thy right hand doth smite kings in the day of his wrath. He judgeth among the nations. It is filled with dead bodies;* He doth smite the chiefs^ [goi^ig] over^ a wide land. Of the brook on the way he drinketh,^ therefore he lifteth his head." The first strophe cites an utterance exalting the Messiah to the right hand of God, to a throne of supre- macy over all his enemies. He is then represented as riding forth from Zion in his chariot, at the head of an army of youthful volunteers, a multitude vast as the dew-drops of the morn, in fulness and freshness of youth, and in holy and beautiful attire. The second strophe cites an oath of Jahveh making ^ Line 4 is a half line in order to a metrical pause. ^ nm^ is used, as in Judg. v. 2, to indicate the heroic courage of the people. They volunteer to follow their king into the battle. There is no sufficient reason for thinking of the free-will offerings of the priest code. ^ im?'' ^D = dew of thy youth. The youth does not refer to the age of the king, as some have supposed, but to the age of the volun- teers. They are young men in holy attire. They spring forth at his call as fresh and numerous as the dew-drops at the break of day. * r\V)i S/JQ- The verb is intransitive. Its subject is the battle- field, which is sufficiently plain from the context. ^ t^X"l is collective, and parallel with D'^D^C ^ ^y is pregnant, implying the verb *]!?n. It indicates the wide extent of the battlefield and the victory. '^ This is a reminiscence of the victory of Gideon and his men at the spring Harod (Judg. vii.). The king presses on in pursuit of his foes, and drinks of the brook while in movement, without halting. He is eager to gain a complete victory. He lifts up his head in the proud consciousness that it has been gained. 134 MESSLLNIC PROPHECY. the Messiah a priest-king after the order of Melchizedek. It represents Jahveh on his right hand in the conflict. We see him dashing in pieces the kings and the chiefs of the enemy in order to exalt the Messiah to be chief over all. The victorious march extends over a wide country; the battlefield is filled with the slain. The Messiah is wearied with the struofde, but he halts not in his march of victory, drinking of the brook on the way like the warriors of Gideon, and tarries not until his exaltation over all has been accomplished. This prediction combines priesthood and royalty in the Messiah. It is thus an unfolding of the covenant of Sinai. As the nation of Israel had then been consti- tuted a kingdom of priests, a holy nation, so now by a divine oath the Davidic monarch is constituted the priest- king at the head of a kingdom of priests. Melchizedek is the model for such a priest-king coming down from primitive times. The prediction of Balaam is resumed, and the conquering sceptre which dashes in pieces all enemies is now in the hands of this priest - king, the second David. Zion is the seat of his dominion over the nations. The intimate relationship is represented as an enthronement at the right hand of Jahveh, and also as the presence of Jahveh at his right hand in the battle. This idea was never realized in the history of Israel. It belongs to the great High Priest after the order of Melchizedek, who reigns on the heights of the heavenly Zion until all things are subdued to His heavenly sceptre. V. THE ENTHRONED MESSIAH. § 44. Psalm II. rej^irescnts the Messiah enthroned on Zion at the right hand of Jahveh as His son, citing a divine decree entitling him to the position, ivith all its prerogatives, of universal and everlasting sovereignty. THE MESSIANIC IDEA IN THE DAVIDIC PEKIOD. 135 " Wliy do nations rage,^ And peoples meditate a vain thing ? Kings of earth set themselves, And rulers do take counsel together : Against Jahveh, and against his anointed, Saying^ ' Let us break their bands asunder, And let us cast away their cords from us.' II. He that is throned in heaven laugheth : The Lord derides them : Then he speaks unto them in his anger, And in his hot wrath troubles them, Baying^ * Verily, I, even I, have set my king On Zion, my holy mountain.' III. Let me tell of a decree of Jahveh,^ He said unto me, ' Thou art my son, I, to-day,* have begotten thee. Ask of me and I will give nations,^ Thine inheritance and possession will be the ends of earth ; Thou shalt break them with an iron sceptre, As a potter's vessel dash them in pieces.' ■^ ^T\ is an Aramaic word only used here in Hebrew. It is kindred with K^yi = to quake. It indicates the noisy demonstra- tions, the tumult that precedes rebellion, 2 The second strophe is an antistrophe to the first, so arranged that every line is in antithesis to its fellow, with the single exception of the fifth. We should expect the object of the wrath of God to be mentioned here to correspond with the previous strophe. In view of the symmetry of the psalm in other respects, I cannot escape the feeling that a line has been omitted by a later editor or copyist. ^ nin^ pn PX. We disregard the Massoretic accents, and regard pn as construct before nins and thus we avoid the awkward placing of niiT' before the verb, which seems to be without force here, and it also make the lines more symmetrical. ^ The day is the day of the installation. The begetting is the establishment in the official sonship relation, as in the prediction of Nathan (2 Sam. vii. 11-16) and the covenant with Israel (Ex. iv. 22). _* We follow the rhythm and disregard the Massoretic accents in this line and the following. 136 MESSIANIC PROPHECY. lY. And now, ye kings, act wisely, Be instructed, judges of earth. Serve Jaliveh with fear, And reverence with trembling, render^ sincere^ homage, Lest he be angry, and ye perish in the way ; For soon his anger may be kindled. Blessed are all who seek refuge in him." The first strophe represents the nations as plotting to throw off the yoke of the recently installed monarch, the anointed son of Jahveh. In the antistrophe Jaliveh is seen quietly laughing at their uneasiness, deriding their vain devices, speaking in anger to those who are rising up in rebellion, and terrifying with his wrath the plotting assembly, all culminating in the decisive word that God had already installed the Messiah. The second part of the psalm introduces the Messiah himself as speaking ; telling of a decree of Jahveh which 1 "We disregard the accents of lines 4 and 5, and attach ^^"Ip^J to the previous line, and thus make a better rhythm. 2 13 is rendered " son " in the Peshitto and modern Versions. But the E. V. in the margin rightly calls attention to the renderings of the ancient Versions. The Targum renders, "receive instruction;" the LXX. Ipa^otads 'TTuiliixg ; the Vulgate, appreheridite cUsciplinam. They take 13 as the Aramaic noun, meaning " instruction," " jDiety." Aquilla, Symmachus and Jerome render, " worship in purity," and take 12 as meaning "pure," "clear." The rendering "son" has only the Peshitto in its favour. The word is only found once in Hebrew, in Prov. xxxi. 2, which is distinguished by other Aramaisms. The Peshitto's authority is weakened by the fact that it follows its own dialect. Our psalm uses the Hebrew p for son in ii. 2. Moreover, the absence of the article is hard to explain with this meaning. The previous line exhorts to reverence Jahveh, and the following context is referred more naturally to Him. The con- text urges that we should have here some expression of reverence and submission to Jaliveh. Moreover, we should expect " kiss the sceptre," rather than " kiss the son." The ancient Versions, with the exception of the Peshitto, give strong external authority in favour of the rendering to which the context tends. This is best given by taking 12 as a proper Hebrew word, with the meaning " pure," " sincere," and by translating " render sincere homage ; " for the kiss is the kiss of homage and not of affection. The rhythmical arrangement that we have given favours this view. THE MESSIANIC IDEA IN THE DAVIDIC PERIOD 137 entitled him to the rank of sonship and dominion over the nations. The antistrophe of this part is a warning to those inclined to rebellion, that they submit themselves with sincere homage to the divinely-enthroned monarch. The cited decree reminds us of the oracle of Ps. ex. and the promise, 2 Sam. vii. ; but the contents of the decree are somewhat different from either of these pre- dictions. We have therefore another and an independent divine communication. There is an advance upon the conception of Ps. ex. There the Messiah was called to the right hand of Jahveh, and rides forth to the battle at the head of an army of priest - kings to the victory over the nations. Here the Messiah is calmly seated at the right hand of Jahveh in the relation of son- ship, enthroned on Mount Zion, and rebuking his enemies with a divine decree, which entitles him to his position, with all its prerogatives of sovereignty. The relation of sonship is emphasized. The subjugation of the rebellious is represented as the inevitable result of his irresistible power. The conquest of Ps. ex. is presupposed.^ VI. THE EIGHTEOUS KING. § 45. Psalm LXXII. rejpresents the Messianic hing riding in righteousness, mercy and peace, receiving the homage of the nations, the source and olject of universal blessing. The psalm presents the aspirations of Israel for the Messianic king, and, with a prayer for divine endow- ^ The decree is cited by Paul in Acts xiii. 33 and Eom. i. 4, and rightly applied to the enthronement of Jesus the Messiah at the right hand of God in heaven at His ascension. In the Epistle to the Hebrews (i. 5) it is combined with 2 Sam. vii., and referred to the enthroned Jesus. In Acts (iv. 25) the fruitless rebellion of the nations is applied to the gathering together of Herod and Pilate, the Gentiles and the people of Israel against the crown rights of Jesus. These New Testament writers clearly discern the essential features of the prediction as fulfilled in the antitype of Solomon. 138 MESSIANIC PROPHECY. ments, predicts the character of the monarch and his reign. None but Solomon could present the type for such an ideal. Each of the three strophes begins with a prayer. They correspond with the prayer of Solomon for wisdom at Gibeon and at the dedication of the temple. Never before or subsequently has there been such a reign of peace and glory in Israel. The predic- tions of the Messianic king were pointed in a more peaceful direction by the reign of Solomon. We observe in this psalm a further unfolding of the blessings of the nations, which have been presented already in the Abrahamic promise, but have assumed in the subsequent predictions of Jacob, Balaam and the previous psalms the form of subjugation and crushing. Here the sceptre of iron is transformed into a sceptre of reconciliation and peace. I. " O God, give thy judgments ^ to a king, and thy righteous- ness to a king's son. He will judge thy people with righteousness, and thine afflicted with judgment. The mountains will bear peace for the people, and the hilk in righteousness. He will judge the afflicted of the people, save the sons of the poor, and he will crush oppressors. They will fear thee as long as the sun, and before the moon through all generations. He will come down like rain upon the mown grass : as showers will he water the land. In his days wiU the righteous flourish ; and abundance of peace till the moon be no more. ^ The Revised Version neglects the jussives of vers. 8 and 15 and renders them as futures. The margin renders them and the common forms of the imperfect that follow, all alike as jussives. Both are wrong in neglecting the dillerenees in form and meaning. The strophes begin with the jussives of petition and then change into the imperfects of prediction. The Eevised Version entirely misses the rhythm. The psalm is a hexameter with occasional pentameters and tetrameters. THE MESSIANIC IDEA IN THE DAVIDIC PERIOD. 139 II. Yea, let him rule from sea to sea ; and from the river unto the ends of the earth. Before him they that dwell in the wilderness ^ will bow ; his enemies will lick the dust. Kings of Tarshish and the isles will render tribute,^ Kings of Sheba and Seba will bring gifts, Yea, all kings will do obeisance to him : all nations will serve him.^ He will have pity upon the weak and poor ; and the persons of the poor will he save ; From oppression and from violence he will redeem their life ; and precious will their blood be in his eyes. III. Yea, let him live ; and let them give him of the gold of Sheba : And let them pray for him continually ; all the day bless him. Let there be abundance of grain in the land,* — On the top of the mountains it will rustle with its fruit like Lebanon, Yea, they will bloom out of the city as the grass of the earth. Let his name be for ever ; before the sun let his name sprout forth.s And all nations will bless themselves ^ with him ; they will pronounce him happy." 1 QNi^f = the animals or tribes of the dry and waterless wastes. ^ "l^DtJ'tC, a noun, only used here and Ez. xxvii. 15, is formed by prefix K from 13 L^. It means gift, hwe, tribute. ^ There is an interpolation between the fifth and sixth lines, as we can see by comparing Job xxix. 12 — "b nry |\si ^m y^^o n"'3x h'^T '•a The clause with "i^ is different from all the other clauses of the previous and subsequent context, which are all clauses of direct statement in future indicatives in the progressive parallelism. * Line 3 of strophe III. is a broken line in order to gain a metrical pause. The Revised Version follows the accents and misses the movement here and in the following line. * pi'', Hiph. of p^ The Qeri has p:>, Niph. The word is only found here. It means to sprout^ produce fruit. Jinnon is a Talmudic name for the Messiah, based on this passage (Schottgen, de Messia, p. 4) and Talmud, Synhed. 986. ^ D''13 i^D U 1D"i3n"' is based on the Abrahamic promise, Gen. xYii 18, xxvi. 4. (See p. 89.) 140 MESSIANIC PROPHECY. The reign of Solomon was marked by a multitude of tributary gifts and voluntary presents sent by many nations and presented by their princes to the wise and great monarch. Egypt, Phoenicia, Sheba, Tarshish, and possibly India honoured him with gifts. This made it possible to see in him the reflection of the Messiah receiving the grateful offerings of the nations. The universality of the blessing is well brought out. It attains a climax in the closing reiteration of the Abrahamic blessing. There is also an unfolding of the blessing of the holy land in the line of the prediction of Jacob. Vn. THE BRIDAL OF THE MESSIAH. § 46. Psalm XLV. re'j^rescnts the Messianic king in Godlike majesty as a hridcgroom espousing and rejoicing over the nations as his brides. The occasion for the composition of this psalm was probably the marriage of Jorani of Judah with Athalia of Israel.-^ But it matters little if some other monarch be regarded as tlie type. The Psalmist contemi)lates the glories of the bridegroom, the splendours of the bridal ceremony, and the joys of the marriage. These mirror to him the bridal of the Messiah with the nations. There is an advance from Ps. ii., which presents the absolute authority and permanence of the reign of the Messiah over the nations, through Ps. Ixxii., which describes the blessings of that reign, to Ps. xlv., which represents the relation of the Messiah to the nations as a marriage relation. The psalm is com- posed of three rapidly increasing strophes with refrains ; the external form corresponds with the swell of the description. ^ See Delitzsch, Fsalmen, 4 Aufl. p. 359, Leipzig 1883. THE MESSIANIC IDEA IN THE DAVIDIC PEKIOD. 141 I. " My heart swells with a goodly matter : I am saying my work respecting a king : My tongue is the pen of a ready wi'iter, Thou art fairer than the children of men ; Grace has been poured out on thy lips ; Therefore God hath blessed thee for ever. II. Gird thy sword upon thy thigh, O hero,^ thy glory and thy majesty ; In thy majesty prosper, ride on. In behalf of faithfulness and meekness, — righteousness ;* That thy right hand may show thee wonders. Thine arrows are sharp ; Peoples fall under thee ; Thou art in the midst ^ of the king's enemies. Thy throne, divine one,* is for ever and ever : A sceptre of equity is the sceptre of thy kingdom ; Thou dost love righteousness and hate wickedness : Therefore God, thy God, hath anointed thee. ^ The Massoretic accents are wrong. The rhythm, parallelism, and assonance favour the arrangement ^mni 11)7] -lua ^ p1^"niiy is anomalous, nijy is not a construct, but an absolute shortened because of the MakJceph. py^ is therefore in apposition with it. The LXX. inserts «a/. 3 D72 is not to be connected with arrows, but with the monarch, who is represented as pressing into the midst of his enemies, as in Ps. ex. 2, "]^n''J< mp3. Comp. Ex. xv. 8, D^"a^3. * DTlPi^ *1^^D^. The most natural interpretation is to take D'Tli'J^ as vocative, and conclude that the monarch is addressed as divine. This is not strange to ancient poetry. The great kings reflect the divine majesty, and in a sense partake of the divine nature. Comp. Ps. viii. 5, Ixxxii. 6, John x. 35, where D\1/X is used for the exalted monarchs and heavenly intelligences. The Messianic king is pre-eminently the son of God, and as such might with projn-iety be addressed as DTl^J^, without any thought of confounding him with the one God of Jewish faith. Hupfeld, Moll, et al.^ take ")S
assive. The gates are personified, and called upon to rise up and extend themselves in every way, so as to give worthy entrance to a monarch of such majesty and glory. 2 nt is used to emphasize the interrogative, as frequently in Hebrew. It is incorrectly rendered ^^this king" in A.V.^ and is altogether ignored in R.V. In ver. 10 it is enlarged to nt Sin ""D. This is incorrectly rendered by II.V. and A.V., as if it were ">0 ntn *Tl33n ^bo- The inquiry is. Who is this one ? namely, the King of Glory, the one you are praising so greatly. ^ The triumphant entrance of Jahveh into Zion is the type of the ascension of the Messiah, Jesus, to the heavenly Zion after His triumphant resurrection. THE MESSIANIC IDEA IN THE DAVIDIC PERIOD. 147 I. " Jahve\ our Lord, How excellent is thy name in all the earth ! Thou whose glory doth extend ^ over the hccavens, Out of the mouth of little children and sucklings, Thou dost establish strength because of thine adversaries, To silence the enemy and the avenger. When I see thy heavens, the work of thy fingers, Moon and stars which thou hast prepared. What is frail man, that thou shouldest be mindful of him % Or the son of man, that thou visitest him % II. When thou didst make him a little lower ^ than the divine beings,^ With glory and honour crowning him ; Thou madest him to have dominion over the works of thine hands. All things thou didst put under his feet ; Sheep and oxen all of them. And also beasts of the field, ^ n^n is in form a cohortative imperative of jfiJ. Bottcher regards it as a permissive imperative, and renders, " mayest thou thyself set thy glory in the heaven." Gesenius renders, " which glory of thine set thou above the heavens." But this is against the context, which is a praise of God's glory as manifest, and not a petition that it may be displayed. Kimchi, Delitzsch, and others take it as infin. const, for the usual nn = n^n = HiH, like mi for ni"l (Gen. xlvi. 3). The E.V. follows the Peshitto and Jerome, Hupfeld and Perowne, in rendering " who hast set ; " as if the form were "^^^3. But it is better to follow the LXX. Wv^ph, with Ewald, Eiehm, Hitzig, and read njn^ as a cognate stem with njn = stretch out, extend. 2 imonril. The l consec. imperf. cannot be rendered as in R.V., " For thou hast." It begins a new strophe, and is preceded by imperfects, to which it cannot be in consecution. We regard it as the protasis of a temporal clause with the historic imperfect in the apodosis. ^ □"•ni'i^O is rendered by the ancient Versions and New Testament citation (Heb. ii. 7), so also A. V. : " angelsP This is not strictly correct, because it would exclude the divine Being Himself. But it is incorrect to think of the divine Being alone as in the R.V. DTl^JK refers to the divine beings, the godhke ones, the heavenly intelligences, who reflect the divine majesty. Hupfeld and Heng- stenberg render by the abstract '■'■ dimnity ;^^ so Perowne, "little lower than God, or little less than divine." But this lacks sufficient justification. 148 MESSIANIC PROPHECY. Birds of lieaven and fishes of the sea, Those that pass through the paths of the seaa Jahveh^ our Lord^ How excellent is thy name in all the earth ! " Tliis beautiful little psalm may be regarded as a reminiscence of the original endowment of mankind as given in the Poem of the Creation.-^ First, the humility of man is presented over against the glory of God. In dignity he was made to fall a little short of those divine beings who are associated with God as heavenly intel- ligences, or, as we would now say, the angels. He is yet crowned with glory and honour, and with dominion over all creatures. This dominion of man is his original endowment, the ideal after which he is to strive all his life. It is the ideal of the human race as such. The psalm presents that ideal manhood which is first realized in the second Adam, who achieved the ideal for Himself and the race.^ XI. THE IDEAL MAN TEIUMPHANT IN DEATH. § 50. Psalm XVI. is a typical Messianic psalm, present- ing the ideal man enjoying the favour of God in a happy lot in life, and in communion with God after departing from life. Psahn xvi. is composed of three strophes of eight trmieter lines each. 1 See § 28. 2 The Messiah at His advent seems to have kept this ideal in mind in His favourite term for Himself, o vUg to^ dv^puTrov, used no less than fifty different times in the Gospels (seventy- eight if we count the parallel passages ; Keim, Jcsil von Nazara^ ii. 66). For this term indicates in the usage of Jesus at once His humility and His destiny as the second Adam. THE MESSIANIC IDEA IN THE DAVIDIC PERIOD. 149 " Preserve me, ^El, for I seek refuge in thee. I say ^ to Jahveh, ' Thou art my Lord : ^ Is not my good dependent on ^ thee ? ' (I say) to the saints * which are in the land, * My nobles,^ in whom is all my delight.' Their sorrows will be multiplied who exchange for another. ^ fl"!^X is pointed as 2 fern. perf. We must then supply the sub- ject '•^aj, as the Targum and margin of E.Y. But this is awkward, and is thought of only as the easiest way of explaining the Masso- retic points. Disregarding them, we may take the form as the 1st pers. perf., with final > elided, like the Aramaic mpj^- So LXX., Vulgate, and E.Y. Gesenius, Hupfeld, Ewald, Perowne. Indeed n occurs in two MSS., De Eossi, and also in Ps. cxl. 13 ; Job xlii. 2 ; 1 Kings viii. 48 ; Ezek. vi. 69. ^ '•yikS is the divine name Lord. But the ancient Versions render " My Lord ;" so E.V. The pointing should then be changed to "lyix. Hupfeld thinks that the "• — is to distinguish the form from "•yij^, " my lords ; " but such a change is no more likely in this case than in other emphatic plurals, and it runs the greater risk of being mistaken for the divine name itself. ^ 7V is variously explained — {a) by Ewald, Delitzsch and E.V., "owr beyond;" (b) by Eiehm and Moll, "wi addition to;'' (c) by Kimchi and Eashi, " incumbent upon." Hupfeld gives ^2 the mean- ing " only," — but without sulficient authority in usage, and renders, "my happiness rests only upon thee." Perowne changes ^2 into *>;:, and renders, " my happiness rests ivholly upon thee." The LXX. and Vulgate render, " since thou hast no need of my goods ; " giving py the meaning of " for," " for the profit of," as if it were PJ5. The Peshitto renders, " my good is from thee ;" and Jerome, " non est sine te." We prefer to regard the clause as interrogative. * D''k^npb. Ewald gives ^ the force of "as /or," "as regards;" Hupfeld, Moll, and Perowne, " belonging to." It is best to regard it as parallel with nirT'S and thus the indirect object of mD^^. ^ ''■}*''n5< is regarded by Gesenius {Lekrg. § 176c?) as a construct for the absolute. But this is bad grammar. It is a construct before the relative clause that follows, if we retain the Massoretic points. But it is better to point n^'nNI ="my nobles." The LXX, Vulgate and Arabic Versions take the form as a verb, and are followed by Schiirer, Diestel and Kamphausen, who read nnS- The chief difficulty remains in the 1 and the nion. The 1 is taken by De 150 MESSIANIC PEOPHECY. I shall not oflfer their drink-offerings of blood,^ And I shall not take their names upon my lips. II. Jahveh is my portion,- my inheritance and my cup : Thou maintainest ^ my lot. The lines have fallen to me in pleasantness ; * Yea, I have a goodly heritage. I shall bless Jahveh who doth counsel me : Yea, in the dark night ^ my reins will teach me. I have set Jahveh before me continually : Since he is on my right hand, I shall not be moved. III. Therefore my heart doth rejoice, And my glory ^ exult, Yea, my flesh dwells in trust ; For thou wilt not abandon me myself to Sheol, "Wette and R.Y. as introducing the apodosis ; but it involves a transfer of the nDH, and if this is to be done it is still better to transfer the l to D'^D'npi'. However, we may take the 1 as inten- sive, " yea," " verily," The riDH is best taken as the representative of the copula, if the present text is preserved. ^ DID. ]D is the preposition expressing the source or material. The drink-offerings are regarded as consisting of blood, because they were offered with hands stained with bloodshed. ^ r\2D is probably an Aramaism for TlJIO, as rhni for ''n!'^^ It is explained by Ewald as a construct of ni3D ; so Hupfeld (see Ps. xi. 6, Ixiii. 11 ; 2 Chron. xxx. 4). ^ T'Cin is usually taken as Hiph. of ']?0S like the Arabic root, meaning "full, ample.'" But Hupfeld, Perowne, Delitzsch and R.V. regard it as an irregular participle of '']^n=heldfccst, maintain. Bbttcher thinks that it is a diminutive of "])on = dear little posses- sion. The LXX. favours the pai'ticiple. But in this case the pointing should be changed. Ewald takes it as a noun, with the meaning possession. This is best, if the Massoretic points are followed. * D^0''Dy3 is rendered by R.V., after Ewald, Delitzsch, Perowne and others, as lovely places. But it is more properly, with Hupfeld, BiJttcher and Moll, an abstract plural, meaning lovelviess, sweetness. So r\'h'h is not night seasons, but dark night, as in Song iii. 1. * nUD is a synonym of K^QJ (comp. Ps. vii. 6), with reference to personal honour. THE MESSIANIC IDEA IN THE DAVIDIC PERIOD. 151 Thou wilt not suffer thy favoured one ^ to see destruction ; ^ Thou wilt make known to me the path to life, Fulness of joys is in thy ^ presence, Pleasures on thy right hand for evermore." The Psalmist bases his hopes on having sought and found refuge with God, from whom comes all his good. His delight is in the pious of the land, and he will not compromise himself with other gods or with the offerings of the wicked. His happy lot has been assigned him by God, and he looks confidently into the future. He does not expect to escape death, but he is assured that God will not forsake him when he departs to Sheol. He will not see destruction there, but will find a path of life and will enjoy the presence of God, and will be placed at His right hand for evermore. The Psalmist has no thought of a resurrection, but of a blessed experience of communion with God after death. This ideal is a Messi- anic ideal, first to be attained by the man in whom alone God is entirely well pleased. It was first through the resurrection of Jesus Christ that the attainment of this hope became possible and actual for the human race.* ^ ^T'DH- The Qeri is to be preferred in accordance with the ancient Versions, the N. T. citations (Acts ii. 27, xiii. 35) and ancient interpreters ; so Delitzsch, Perowne and others. It is also most in accordance with the context. The Kethibh Tj^T'Dn is the more difficult reading, and on that account is preferred by Ewald, Hupfeld and others. But this is the only reason in its favour. The external and internal evidence outweighs this. ^ nnt^ is rendered by the ancient Versions except the Targum, and by the N. T. citation, Acts ii. 27, destruction, corruption, as a segholate noun from nntJ' = to corrupt, destroy. But Gesenius, Ewald, Hupfeld, Delitzsch and Perowne render pit, as if it were a noun from rW = to sink down, and so parallel with b^i^^ ; but this derivation is not so easy, and the ancient authorities are to be followed. 3 ]^j^ = ^er» = in association with the face or presence of Jahveh. * Accordingly Peter applies the passage directly to Jesus Christ, Acts ii. 27, and Paul in Acts xiii. 35, and rightly ; for although there is no thought of a resurrection from Sheol in the psalm, yet the 152 MESSIANIC PROPHECY. The Messianic idea in the Davidic period made a marked advance both on the human and on the di\dne sides. The ideal of the race is presented in the dignity of man as falling a little short of heavenly intelligences, and exalted to dominion over the creatures. The pious man enjoys the special favour of God in this life, and is assured of the continuance of that favour after death. The Davidic king has become the especial channel of the Messianic ideal. He has been exalted to the position of divine sonship, has been enthroned on Mount Zion as a priest-king, and has received authority to reign over Israel and the nations. He conquers all enemies, espouses them as his brides, and reigns in peace and righteousness over them for ever. He is scourged by his divine Father on account of sin, but will never be forsaken by the divine mercy. He builds the temple of Jahveh, and enjoys the divine presence in his capital. He has a faithful priesthood associated with him. The divine side of the Messianic idea has unfolded in parallelism with the human side. Jahveh comes in theophany to deliver His anointed and subdue his enemies. He is a great conqueror, a King of Glory, who battles at the right hand of the Messiah, and triumphs over all foes. He ascends to Mount Zion to reign there for ever. He is the all-knowing Judge who rights all wrongs, and is especially gracious to the weak, the afflicted, and the oppressed. resurrection of Jesus Christ for the first time revealed to man what ■was that blessful experience that the pious might expect to enjoy with God after death. There is no thought of a personal Messiah in the psalm ; yet in that David and none of his successors attained the realization of this blessed hope, it led on to the Messiah who first was able to attain it for Himself and His people. CHAPTEE VI. MESSIANIC IDEAS OF THE EARLIER PROPHETS. The Hebrew Scriptures contain a collection of sacred writings named by the Eabbins, the later prophets, to distinguish them from the earlier prophets, the historical narratives of Joshua, Judges, Samuel and Kings. These are prophets in the higher sense. Joel. The earliest of these prophets was Joel, who prophesied during the first part of the reign of Joash.-^ Many recent critics of the school of Graf think that the; prophecy is post-exilic and the representation apocalyptic, on account of the ritualistic tendencies of the prophet ; but his intense yet classic style, the reference to the Pliilistines and Arabians as the chief enemies, the general and indefinite representation of the Messianic idea, as well as his entire theological attitude, point to the earlier times. The occasion of his prophecy was a fearful plague of locusts which had come upon the land and laid it waste. This was followed by a distressing drought, consuming all that the locusts had left. The prophet interprets these events as divine chastisements, heralding still severer affiictions in the great and terrible day of Jahveh. Hence he exhorts the people to turn to Jahveh with all their hearts, to call a solemn assembly by the ^ So Credner, Hitzig, Ewald, Keil, Delitzsch, Wiinsche. 158 154 MESSIANIC PEOPHECY. sound of the trumpet, and to fast and weep and pray, saying — " Spare thy people, Jahveh, And give not thine heritage to reproach, That the nations should rule over them ; Wherefore should they say among the peoples, Where is their God ? " —Joel ii. 17. The prophet then assures them that Jahveh is jealous for His land, that He pities His people, and that He will do great things for them. The former prosperity will return with the removal of the chastisements. He will pour out His Spirit on all flesh, judge the nations in the vale of judgment in the great and terrible day, and give everlasting peace and prosperity to His people. The style of Joel is classic and highly poetical His discourse " is like a rapid sprightly stream flowing into a dehghtf ul plain." ^ I. THE DAY OF JAHVEH. § 51. Joel describes the advent of Jahveh ly His Spirit in the outpouring of the manifold gifts of prophecy upon all classes and conditions of men ; in the display of wonders on earth and in heaven heralding the approach of the great and terrible day ; and in the deliverance in Jerusalem for all who call upon Jahveh, and are called by Him. All natioiis are assembled in the vale of Jchoshaphat for judgment. This is represented as a great harvest accom- p)anied with convulsions of nature. The people of God become a fertile land, their enemies a desolate wilderness, **And it will come to pass afterward, I will pour out my Spirit upon all flesh ; And your sons and your daughters will prophesy, Your old men will dream dreams. Your young men will see visions : 1 Wiinsche, Joel^ p. 38, Leipzig 1872. I MESSIANIC IDEAS OF THE EARLIER PROPHETS. 155 And also upon the bondmen and upon the bondwomen, In those days I will pour out my Spirit, And I will put wonders in heaven, And on earth ^ blood and fire and pillars of smoke, The sun will change itself into darkness, and the moon into blood, Before the coming of the great and the terrible ^ day of Jaliveh, And it will come to pass that whosoever will call on the name of Jahveh will be delivered ; For in Mount Zion and in Jerusalem will be rescue, According as Jahveh doth say. And among the survivors ^ whom Jahveh is going to call." * — Joel iii. Joel vividly describes the advent of Jahveh in the outpouring of His Spirit on all flesh, and in providing salvation for His people in the great and terrible day of His wrath. Joel dwells on the former part of his theme in the third chapter, the latter part being the dark back- ground from which, after presenting it, he returns to the scenes of the past and the present. He recalls the sad features of the invasion of Judah by the Arabs and the Philistines in the reign of Jehoram, when they carried into captivity the children of Judah, and spoiled the land of its riches.^ From this sad scene he rises in the assurance of divine retribution to his theme of the divine judgment. He proclaims it at first with reference to these nations individually, as an exact recompense ; and then from these as types he rises in prophetic thought to 1 pt^n is usually attached to the previous line ; but the paral- lelism and rhythm are against it. There may be a reference to war in the expressions of this line ; but if this be so, it is, in accordance with iv. 9 seq., a reference to the war of Jahveh, in which the theophany and convulsions of nature constitute the principal features. 2 The LXX. read nx"l3, and rendered by im(pect/^, and is followed by the New Testament in Acts ii. 20. ^ The LXX. read DntJ'^ = evangelized ; but this is a later usage, and is not well sustained. * The ^5-lp of Jahveh is antithetical to the iOp of the people. * 2 Chron. xxi. 16. 156 MESSIANIC PROPHECY. the judgment-seat of the world, and beholds all nations assembled for judgment. We have seen that Messianic prophecy has two lines of development which run parallel with each other, and never coincide under the Old Testament, — the advent of Jahveh, and the advent of the seed of the woman, who is also the seed of Abraham and the seed of David. The advent of Jahveh is now represented in two distinct phrases : first, as an advent of grace and revival through the outpouring of His Spirit, and then as an advent of judgment in the outpouring of His wrath. In subsequent prophecy these two phases generally appear apart, but sometimes blend together, as in Chapter III., in sublime mystery. Under the New Testament fulfilment, however, the divine advent is resolved into two advents, the one at Pentecost, the other at the judgment day at the end of the world.-^ In the interpretation of this prophecy we are not to limit its range to the era of the first advent, for the advent of grace is an advent which continues until the advent of judgment. The time between the advents is the last day of Old Testament prophecy. Hence the mingling of the two in the predictions.^ ^ Peter (Acts ii.) claims that this prophecy was fulfilled in the outpouring of the Holy Spirit on the day of Pentecost. And Paul (Kom. X. 12, 13) applies our passage to the universal gosjjel call and the calling upon God through faith in Jesus Christ and the confession of His name. The description of the wonders reappears in Matt. xxiv. 29, e.g. in the discourse of Jesus as premonitions of the destruction of the world. ^ Thus the gifts of the Holy Spirit were striking and marvellous on the day of Pentecost, when He descended in theophany to abide with men ; and His gifts, the ■)cocoi(juoi.Tot of Rom. xii. 6, 1 Cor. xii., were peculiar to that age. Yet notwithstanding these gifts of the Holy Spirit have disappeared for eighteen centuries as to their more striking and miraculous forms, they are none the less present, and have ever been present with increasing and not diminishing fulness and efficacy, as to their substance and real intrinsic worth. They are the more in accordance with the promise itself, that they MESSIANIC IDEAS OF THE EARLIER PROPHETS. 157 The prediction of the great judgment is in the form of a proclamation of Jahveh, the King of Israel, to the nations, calling them to the last conflict, which is to decide the destiny of all. It is composed of three strophes. I. " Proclaim ye this among the nations ; Consecrate war ; ^ arouse the heroes ; Let all the men of war draw near, come up. Beat your ploughshares into swords, and your pruning-knives into spears : Let the weak ^ say I am a hero. Assemble ^ and come all nations, have become so common and universal in their form as well as in their substance ; for the Holy Spirit is the abiding Paraclete, as the Saviour promised (John xiv. 16). Like the meek and lowly Jesus, He prefers the quiet and unostentatious impartation of His gifts and graces, as He distributes appropriately to each individual of the millions of Christian souls, marshals the forces of the Church in her conflicts with Antichrist, and steadily and constantly advances towards the completion of the work of grace for the world. In the same way we are to interpret the wonders of heaven and earth. We may think of the marvels of the theophanies at the crucifixion, the resurrection and Pentecost, but guided by our Saviour's interpretation of the fall of the tower of Siloam (Luke xiii. 4, 5), and His reference to the destruction of Jerusalem (Matt. xxiv.), we are to regard the great and the little convulsions of the heavens and the earth as individually and collectively heralds of the approaching convulsions of the judgment day. And thus guided by St. Paul (Eom. x. 12), we see the deliverance on Mount Zion in the redemption of Jesus, and think of the gospel call going forth through the Spirit and Bride to the ends of the earth ; and of that constantly increasing number from all parts of the world who confess the name of Jesus, and find salvation through faith and the communion of prayer. 1 War was consecrated by sacrifices : see 1 Sam. vii. 8 ; Isa. xiii. 3 : Jer. li. 27. 2 j»>^n is found only here in the nominal form. Job xiv. 10 has the verbal form. These are the only two examples of the use of this stem in Hebrew in the sense that is common to it in Aramaic. ^ tJ>iy is found only here. It is rendered by the LXX., Peshitto and Targum, assemble, come together. This is favoured by the parallelism. Most interpreters prefer to regard it as kindred with li^n, and render, hasten. 158 MESSIANIC PROPHECY. From round about gather ^ thither, Lead down,^ Jahveh, thy heroes. Let the nations arouse themselves to come up Unto the valley of Jehoshaphat ; for there shall I sit enthroned To judge all nations from round about. Put forth the sickle, for harvest is ripe : Come, tread ye ; for the winepress is full, The fats overflow ; for their wickedness is great. II. Multitudes, multitudes in the valley of decision, For near is the day of Jahveh in the valley of decision. The sun and moon j^ut on mourning, And the stars withdraw their brightness, And Jahveh roareth from Zion, And from Jerusalem giveth his voice ; So that heaven and earth quake : But Jahveh is a refuge for his people, And a stronghold for the sons of IsraeL Then will ye know that it is I, Jahveh, your God, Dweller in Zion my holy mountain. And Jerusalem will be a holy place. And strangers will no more pass through her. III. And it will come to pass in that day, The mountains will drip with new wine, And the hills will flow with milk. And all the brooks of Judah will flow with water.^ And a fountain will issue from the house of Jahveh,* And water the vale of Shittim.^ . ^ 1V3P31 is Niphal perfect with Vav consec. But it is rendered by the Versions as an imperative. This is favoured by the context and the rhythm. Kimchi, Ewald and Wlinsche take the form as an anomalous imperative. But it is better to read an imperative at once, ivapn without the 1. , v ., 2 nnjn is Hiph. imper. of nnj. The LXX. renders, o 'Trpccvg earc^ 8 This representation of the wonderful fertility of the land is based upon the earlier promises. Gen. xlix. ; Ex. iii. 8 ; Lev. xxvi. * The stream from the house of God is a familiar conception of later prophecy, where it is more elaborate ; see Ps. xlvi. 4 ; Ezek. xlvii. ; Zech. xiv. 8 ; Kev. xxii. 3. ^ D^DC^n, the acacias. This was the name of the waste section MESSIANIC IDEAS OF THE EAELIER PROPHETS. 159 Egypt will become a desolation, And Edom will become a desolate wilderness, Because of violence ^ toward the children of Judah, When they shed innocent ^ blood in their land. But Judah will abide for ever, And Jerusalem for generation after generation. And I will cleanse ^ their blood that I have not cleansed, For Jahveh is a dweller in Zion. " * — Joel iv. 9-21. This is the classic passage referring to the divine judgment which reappears in all subsequent Old Testa- ment prophecy, and in the New Testament in the words of our Saviour and John. We see first the assembly of armed hosts of all nations before the throne in the valley of decision. On the one side stand the armies of the enemies. On the other side stand the armies of God, the weakest of its warriors a hero. The judgment is not so much a conflict of armies as a great harvest. There is a reaping with the sickle of judgment, a treading of grapes in the winepress. Multitudes are in great terror and confusion, for all nature is in commotion. The sun, moon and stars put on mourning. Heaven and earth quake, and a terrible voice causes all nature to tremble. Finally, we observe the result of this judgment. The enemies have become a desolation, a desolate wilder- on the east of the Jordan where the Israelites were seduced by the Moabites, Num. xxv. 1. The prophet represents this stream as crossing the Jordan in its influence. This is impossible in fact. It is thus an evidence of the symbolical character of the representation (see p. 50). •^ D!on. The construct is here the construct of the object — violence towards. 2 ^tp:, for the usual ""pj, only here and Jonah i. 4, an Aramaism. ^ Tl'^p^ Biel of npi = to be pure ; Niph., to be innocent ; Piel, to make pure, cleanse, and so to pronounce clean, acquit. The cleans- ing away may be by ceremonies of atonement or by punishment. The context is in favour of the latter. * 1^3 pK^, an appropriate close to the prophecy, to emphasize this as the great central fact of consolation and confidence. Comp. n'O^ nin\ Ezek. xlviii. 35. 160 MESSIANIC PROPHECY. ness, while the condition of the people of God is as an exceedingly fertile land. Jahveh dwells in Zion, Jerusalem is holy, the land flows with wine and milk. A fountain of living waters goes forth from the house of God and quickens the most barren portions of the land, so that there is everywhere life and prosperity, for God dwells in Zion, the fountain source of every blessing to His land and people.* Amos. The second Messianic prophet is Amos the herdsman of Tekoa. Amos prophesied during the reign of Jeroboam II. of Israel and Uzziah of Judah. Jeroboam II. was the greatest of all the kings of the northern kingdom. He conquered Damascus and all Syria to the Euphrates, although he did evil in the sight of Jahveh, as did his namesake the founder of the monarchy.^ Uzziah of Judah served Jahveh and prospered. He conquered Edom and Arabia Petrsea to the gulf of Elah and the river of Egypt.^ During these reigns the kingdoms of Israel and Judah enjoyed a wider dominion than that of David. Israel was never more prosperous ; but, alas ! tliis prosperity was all external. The house of David was still bereaved of the northern tribes, who were corruj)t and hostile ; so much so, that during the previous reign of Amaziah of Judah they had broken down the wall of Jerusalem and spoiled the temple and the king's palace.* The breaches had not been healed, but were growing wider and wider, ^ We are guided by our Saviour (Matt, xxiv.), in His prophecy of the destruction of Jerusalem and the world, to refer the prophecy to the final judgment of the last great day (see also Eev. vi. 12, xiv. 14-20, xvi. IG, xx. 11-15, xxii. 13). 2 2 Kings xiv. 24, 25. « 2 Chron. xxvi. * 2 Kin"'X, my man, my husband. 2 The weak Vavs with the imperfects are intensive. It seems difficult to give them any other meaning here. ^ The Massoretic text of the Western Jews is niH"' nx TiyiS and this is supported by the LXX. But the Babylonian codex reads nin*' ""Jt? ""D, and this is supported by the Vulgate, and seems best suited to the contrast between "»t)y2 and '^^'^^ above. 172 MESSIANIC PKOPHECY. repent, and therefore is stripped of her gifts that she had received of her husband Jahveh, and had attributed to Baal. Jahveh hedges up her way and walls her in, so tliat she cannot attain unto Baal. Then she repents and returns unto her husband. He receives her again, but first subjects her to disciphne, as with Israel in the wilderness. Here the prophet uses the exodus from Egypt and the entrance into Canaan as the symbolic framework for his Messianic prophecy. As at the early marriage Jahveh led her forth from Egypt into the wilderness, so now at the restoration she goes forth into the wilderness. There her husband comforts her, and gives her the vineyard of which he had stripped her. Erom the wilderness he leads her back into her land by the vale of Akhor. This vale had been the vale of tribulation to ancient Israel through the sin of Achan, but had become a door of hope, being the vale through which they ascended to the capture of Ai, and thus obtained a permanent lodgment in the midst of the land.^ Thus restored Israel will pass through the vale of tribulation, and even there find a door of hope through which she will enter into possession of her inheritance. She is then reunited to her husband for ever. A covenant with the animal kingdom is made, and the instruments of war are destroyed. The covenant with the animal kingdom, in accordance with Gen. i. and Ps. viii., is to bestow upon Israel the original endowment and ideal inheritance of mankind. The instruments of war are destroyed in order to permanent peace. The divine attributes are the holy bands which bind together in indissoluble union. " All nature responds to the advent of Jahveh. It is as if we heard the sublime harmonies of the powers of nature as they act upon one another, sustained and moved by the fundamental tone of the creating and ^ Josh. vii.-viii. MESSIANIC IDEAS OF THE EARLIER PROPHETS. 1*73 shaping spirit."^ The marriage of Jahveh to Israel is somewhat different from the marriage of the Messianic king to the nations as we have observed it in Ps. xlv. The marriage is a remarriage of an unfaithful wife.^ III. The prophet, in the third section of his symbol, lays stress upon the great love of Jahveh to His unfaithful wife. " And Jahveh said unto me, Go again, love a woman, beloved of a friend and an adulteress, according to the love of Jahveh toward the children of Israel ; though they are turning unto other gods, and are lovers of raisin cakes.^ And so I bought * her to me, for fifteen pieces of silver and a homer and a half of barley, and said unto her, Many days thou shalt abide for me ; thou shalt not commit whoredom, and thou shalt not belong to any one. And I also will (abide) for thee. For during many days the children of Israel will abide, without a king and without a prince, and without a peace- ofifering and without a pillar, and without an ephod or teraphim.^ * TJmbreit, Commentar u. d. Kleinen Propheten^ Hamburg 18V7. 2 "We are then to think not of the bridal of the Messiah of the New Testament, which is from another point of view like that of Ps. xlv., but of the Church as the mother (Rev. xii.), as the woman clothed with the sun, and with the moon under her feet, and having upon her head a crown of twelve stars, who is persecuted by the dragon and driven into the wilderness, yet is preserved by God for eventual restoration ; for as Hengstenberg says : " The three stations — Egypt, the wilderness, and Canaan — are ever present; but we go from the one to the other only with the feet of the spirit, and not as under the Old Covenant, at the same time with the feet of the body." 3 nti*"'tJ^N = grape or raisin cake, used as nn^D by the worshippers of Baal, and eaten in the sacrificial meals (comp. 1 Sam. xxv. 18). ^ m3S<. The meaning "buy" is generally given to this form mD in accordance with the context. The price is the price of a slave (Ex. xxi. 32), half in money and half in barley. The wife of Jahveh had become the slave concubine of Baal. There is here, as in chap, ii., a reference to deliverance from bondage in which EgyjDt is the basis of representation. ^ These things of which Israel would be deprived are arranged in three pairs, the one referring to the service of Baal, the other to the service of Jahveh. During her period of discipline, civil and religious institutions would not be in her possession. 174 MESSIANIC PEOPHECY. Afterwards the children of Israel will return, and seek Jahveh their God and David their king ; and come trembling ^ unto Jahveh and unto his goodness in the latter days." — Hos. iii. This passage emphasizes the love of Jaliveh towards Israel notwithstanding her unfaithfulness, a love which is punitive and yet restorative. She is to abide many days alone as a widow away from her husband and away from her lover Baal. This is interpreted to mean that Israel will abide many days without a government and without a worship of their own, without the king of David's line and without a prince of any other line, without the worship of Jahveh and without the worship of Baal. Afterwards they will seek Jahveh their God and David the Messianic king, and come trembliug to Jahveh in the latter days. It is evident that the prophet does not identify the human Messiah, the second David, with Jahveh, although they are closely united so that a returning to the one is a returning to the other.^ Hosea gives several fine pictures of the restoration, and uses symbols of great strength and beauty. Chapter xi. represents the deliverance from Egypt under the figure of a father teaching his son to walk and drawing him on with cords of love. But the son becomes rebellious notwithstanding loving care, healing words, and tender provisions for his support. On this account he is delivered over to the Assyrian. The prophet then grap]\ically depicts the grief of the father and the resulting restora- tion. " How can I give thee up, Ephraim ; Deliver thee over, Israel ? How can I make thee as Admah,* Set thee as Zeboim ? ^ i>^< *inD is pregnant, so that J<13 is to be supphed. * Compare Ps. ii. and ex. See pp. 132-137. * These are the cities destroyed with Sodom (Gen. xiv. 8). MESSIANIC IDEAS OF THE EARLIER PROPHETS. l75 Mine heart is turned within me, My compassions are kindled together. I will not execute the heat of my anger, I will not again destroy Ei>liraim : For I am ^El, and not man ; A Holy One in the midst of thee : And I will not come to consume/ After Jahveh they will go, As a lion will he roar : When he roaretli, Then let ^ children come trembling from the seaward, Come trembling like a bird from Egypt, And as a dove from the land of Asshur ; And I will cause them to dwell in their houses, Is the utterance of Jahveh." — Hos. xi. 8-11. This prediction looks forward to a second deliverance from captivity after the model of the Egyptian. But the captivity is viewed as extending to Egypt, Assyria and the seaward. Chap. xiii. gives another representation of the punish- ment and of the restoration. Israel has destroyed himself by his iniquity. The kings, given by God to the people reluctantly in accordance with their cravings, can no longer save them. The time for punishment has come, Israel is to die and be restored after he has descended into Sheol. ^ "l^V? might be brute, cattle, beast. It would heighten the con- trast of the previous line — God and no man ; a holy God, and not a beast to devour. A.V. and E.V. render "in the city;" but this would require the article and does not give good sense, n"*!? is taken by many, De Wette, Henderson, Gesenius, and Ewald, as from n^y = to be hot, and so they get the meaning anger ; but this is question- able, and is not in accordance with the parallelism. Many recent interpreters, Steiner, Cheyne, et al, think of nyp, to consume, destroy, and point it as infin. or participle. This is suited to the context and seems to be best. 2 The weak 1 with the imperf. cannot be taken as the apodosis, for that would require 1 consec. of the perfect. We might take it aa in emphatic parallelism ; but we would rather expect that the trembling would be the result of the roaring, and not co-ordinate with it. It is better therefore to take it as jussive. 176 MESSIANIC rROPHECY. " From the power of Sheol I will redeem thee, From death I will ransom thee. Where are thy plagues, Death ? Where is thy pestilence, Sheol ] Compassions will be hid from mine eyes." — Hos. xiii. 14. Jahveh here summons death and Sheol to do their worst, — brmg on their plagues and pestilences, and put Israel to death. He will not interpose in His compassion to save the nation. But after the nation has died and has gone into the Sheol of the nations, then Jahveh will redeem them by bringing them up from Sheol and by imparting to them new life. The prophet thus predicts a national resurrection. This is the first appearance of the conception of a resurrection in the Old Testament theology. It first emerges as a Messiaidc idea, in connection with the restoration of the nation as a nation.^ Chap. xiv. 2-10 represents the restoration in language of tenderness and beauty. The Assyrian captivity is coming. Nevertheless it will not totally destroy the nation. The people are called to repentance and obedi- ence, and receive the promise of di^dne love and revival The poem is dramatic. We have first an exhortation of the prophet, then Ephraim addressing Jahveh in penitence, and Jahveh responding with promises of blessing. This is then continued in a conversation between Ephraim and Jahveh. The prophet concludes with an exhortation. {Prophet) " O return, Israel, Unto " Jahveh thy God ; For thou hast stimibled by thy iniquity. 1 The R.V. correctly renders this passage and removes the errors of the A.Y. The passage is quoted by Paul in 1 Cor. xv. 55 and applied to the triumph of the individual believer over death. The application was a proper one. It is not, however, an interpretation of our passage, for it has in mind only the resurrection of Israel as a nation, and lias no reference to the resurrection of the body. The same idea of a national resuiTection recurs in Ezek. xxxvii. 2 *]y for the usual ^S- MESSIANIC IDEAS OF THE EARLIER PROPHETS. 177 Take with you words, And return unto Jahveh ; Say unto him everything.^ {Israel) Forgive iniquity and accept good ^ things ; And we will render the fruit ^ of our lips. Asshur cannot save us, Upon horses we will not ride, And we will not say any more our god To the work of our hands ; Thou by whom the orphan receives compassion. (Jahveh) I will heal their apostasy, I will love them freely ; For my anger hath turned from him. T will be as the dew to Israel ; Let him bloom as the wild flower,* And let him strike his roots like Lebanon, Let ^ his shoots grow, And let his majesty be as the olive, And let him have scent like Lebanon ; ^ ^3 is regarded by many interpreters as a rare use of the word as an adverh = altogether ; but Hebrew idiom would use the infin. absolute for this purpose. It is taken by Vulgate, R.Y., Henderson, Gesenius, etc., as a rare example of the separation of this adjective from its noun = all iniquity ; but this is bad syntax, and it also makes the line too long and the previous line too short. The LXX. seems to have read instead of it the negative ^ with >::. It is best to attach it to the previous line, after Houbigant, Newcome, et al. These make it qualify the subject of the verb, " all of you ; " but it is better to take it as the object, " all, everything ^^ make a complete confession. Compare p3 nt^V) Isa. xliv. 24. 2 3itD is also taken as an adverb by A.V., Henderson, and many others, ^^ graciously.^' But it is better, with LXX. Vulg. R.V., and most interpreters, to take it as an object of the verb. We should then refer it to the good things to be offered as a sacrifice. ^ CIQ. Thus pointed it is bullock, as the lips are represented as taking the place of bullocks, the latter being in explanatory appo- sition ; so Vulgate, Ewald, R.V. But the margin of the R. V. follows the LXX. and Syriac. Newcome and Steiner rightly prefer it. * ny^lK^. The wild flower of Sharon, the anemone, the brilliant scarlet. See Song of Songs ii. 1, 2. ^ t]'' is a jussive form, and this forces us to render it as jussive, and make the context conform thereto. 178 MESSIANIC PEOPHECY. Let those who abide in his shadow return, Let them quicken ^ the corn, And let them bloom Hke the vine, And their memory be as the wine of Lebanon. Ephraim ^ What have I to do any more with idols 1 {Jahveh) I have responded, and I shall ^ regard him. {Ephraim) I am like a green cypress. {Jahveh) Of me is thy fruit found. {Prophet) Whoso is wise, let him understand these things ; Understanding, let him know them : That the ways of Jahveh are upright, And the righteous walk therein, But transgressors stumble therein." Tlie restoration of Israel is here conceived as accom- panied with great prosperity, as in Joel and Amos.* The land becomes exceedingly fertile like the slopes of Lebanon. Corn and wine, the olive tree, aromatic plants, and wild flowers abound. The people rejoice under the love and blessing of Jahveh, all the more that they have been restored to favour after a season of discipline on account of sin, and that in the experience of heartfelt repentance they have found forgiveness. Messianic prophecy in this period has advanced under the experience of suffering on the part of Israel, and in ^ Quicken the corn, to make it live and grow, or cultivate it ; a strange expression, justified by the symbolism of the passage. 2 Ephraim is here introduced into the text by mistake. It really belongs to the margin or the thought. So the Jewish inter- preters Raschi, Aben Ezra, and Kimchi supply '^0i<^ Cheyne, Nowack, et al. follow the LXX., and regard all but the third member of the verse as the words of Jahveh, and accordingly read 17 for "»^. But these first lines are as we have given them, the first and third words of Ephraim, the second and fourth words of Jahveh. ^ "IJIIC^Nll. The tense changes to contrast the response ah'eady given with the promise of future watchful care. * See pp. 158 and 162. MESSIANIC IDEAS OF THE EARLIER PROPHETS. 179 view of the impending exile of the northern kingdom. Both lines of the Messianic idea assume a new form in view of these circumstances. The advent of Jahveh has two sides. It is on the one hand for the revival of Israel, and on the other hand for the judgment of all the nations that are hostile to His kingdom. It is especially the restoration of Israel that is emphasized. The restora- tion is represented as the remarriage of an adulterous wife after a period of discipline ; as the recall from exile of a rebellious son ; as the resurrection from the dead of one upon whom the plagues of death have been heaped by divine punishment ; as the bestowal of blessings upon a repenting people ; as a revival through the outpouring of the divine Spirit upon all classes and conditions of men ; and as the bestowal of wonderful fertility and peace upon the holy land. The house of David is to fall into ruins and then be rebuilt, and gain its supremacy over Israel and the nations. The returning exiles are to return in allegiance to David as well as to Jahveh, and are to unite under His headship. CHAPTEE yil. ISAIAH AXD HIS CONTEMPORAEIES. The earlier prophets, whose predictions we have con- sidered in the previous chapter, had the rival kingdoms of Israel and Judah more or less in view. They accom- panied the northern kingdom in its failures with their expostulations, rebukes, exhortations and promises. The Assyrian period came, and this great world-power, after conquering Syria, the earlier foe of Israel, finally over- threw Israel herself and removed considerable numbers of the people into captivity. The age of Hezekiah intro- duces a new era of revival and prosperity for Judah, after severe struggles and conflicts. Judah is now alone the kingdom of God without a rival. Jerusalem becomes the centre of the kingdom of God as never before. The Assyrian is the rod of chastisement. He strives to reduce Judah to the same condition as Israel, but in vain. For the struggle is now a struggle about the holy standard itself, and Jahveh espouses the cause of His suffering people. He raises up His greatest prophets. He pours forth divine instruction in richness and fulness transcending every previous period. Jahveh Himself comes down in theophany as in days of old, and works stupendous miracles in the destruction of the host of Sennacherib and in the healing of Hezekiah.^ A new era began for Judah. A great revival took place. Sacred psalmody and wisdom were revived. Collections * 2 Elings xix.-xx. ; Isa. xxxvii.-xxxviii ISO ISAIAH AND HIS CONTEMPOEARIES. 181 of psalms and sentences were made, and several great prophets uttered prophecies which emphasized as never before the spirituality of the true religion, and urged the nation to move forward toward the realization of the prophetic ideal. The earliest of the prophecies of this period is probably that little piece which was quoted by Isaiah and Micah from an older prophet.-^ These two prophets use the older prediction, and set it in the midst of other pre- dictions. The variations between the two texts are slight. We give the original text so far as we can from a careful criticism of the two passages. I. THE EXALTATION OE THE HOUSE OF JAHVEHi § 54. The temple mount is to he exalted above all mountains as the throiie of Jahveh, the goal of the pilgj^im- age of the nations, the source of instruction and judgment. The reign of Jaliveh will result in the destruction of the weapons of war, and in universal peace and prosperity, " And in the latter days it will come to pass, That the mountain of the house of Jahveh will appear, EstabHshed ^ on the top of the mountains,^ And it will be exalted above the hills ; ^ Isa. ii. 1-4 ; Micah iv. 1-5. 2 Isa. ii. 2 destroys the rhythm by transposing \\21 to the beginning of the sentence, before nin\ riTI^ means, to become, to come forth, to appear. ^ J^X"13 = on the head or top of the mountains, that is, exalted above them all, so that all mountains radiate from it to the several parts of the earth. It is thus rendered visible to all that they may direct their pilgrimages thither. This physical transformation is in the mind of Ezek. xl. 2 and Zech. xiv. 10. It is impossible in fact, but this makes it all the more evident that the prediction is in the sjinbolical form (see p. 50 seq.). It is against the context to render, with Kleinert and others, " as the chief of the mountains," as pre-eminent in estimation. 182 MESSIANIC PKOPHECY. And peoples will flow unto it.^ And many nations will go and say, Come and let us go up unto the mount of Jahveh, Unto the house of the God of Jacob ; That he may teach us of his ways, And that we may walk in his paths ; For out of Zion will go forth instruction, And the word of Jahveh from Jerusalem. And he will judge between the nations,^ And admonish many peoples ; And they will beat their swords into ploughshares, And their spears into pruning-hooks ; ^ Nation will not lift up sword against nation, And they will not learn war any more. And they will dwell each under his vine And under his fig-tree, and none will make them afraid.* For the mouth of Jahveh Sabaoth hath spoken it." The prophet beholds the temple mount, which had been highly exalted by the erection of the temple of Solomon, despised and scorned by the proud hills of the earth upon which the temples of other gods were situated.^ He sees this temple mount rising from its degraded con- 1 Isaiah reads D^liH ^D V^&5 nn::i ; Micah, D^Dy vhv T\n:). The text of Micah is to be preferred. The preposition py is more suited to the idea of the mountain ascent. There is a variation in the terms D''Dy and D""")!! throughout, and this variation is not uniform, but seemingly capricious. Thus Isaiah uses Ci;! in Unes 5 and 13 for the D"'Cy of Micah, but the reverse is the case in lines 6 and 14. But the LXX. of Isaiah in line 6 reads D""!!!, and this is doubtless correct. 2 This line and the following are lengthened in Micah by the addition of cai in the former and pirn"*iy in the latter. The shoiter lines of Isaiah are more suited to the rhythm. Isaiah uses D"'3"» D'^JOy for D''^Vy D"'1J of Micah. These seem to be intentional variations. But the simplicity of the text of Isaiah commends itself as more likely to be that of the original author. ^ There are several slight variations, e.g. fj^ in Isaiah ; "Jj^l in Micah (1. 8) ; Dfimn in Isaiah for Dn^nmn in Micah (1. 15) ; fc^ti^'' in Isaiah for l&>t in Micah (1. 17) ; 'moi?"' in Isaiah for Y\1)J?> in Micah (1. 18). * Lines 19, 20 and 21 are only given by Micah. * Comp. Ps. Ixviii. 15, 16. ISAIAH AND HIS CONTEMPOKAKIES. 183 dition, until it towers above the mountains as the central mountain of the world, visible and accessible to all nations who flow in streams of pilgrimage unto it. From the presence of Jahveh goes forth instruction to guide them so that they walk in the light of it. At the same time judgment goes forth to destroy the instruments of war, so that every one may abide in peace and safety. Universal and everlasting peace is the goal of the prediction. It is vain to seek for any physical fulfilment of the prediction. The sublime description transcends anything that is physical or historical, and from this very fact points to the ideal content which is realized in the exaltation of Jesus Christ to be the heavenly temple, the source of instruction, judgment and everlasting peace to the world. The higher criticism of Zechariah has shown that the section chaps. ix.-xi. belongs to the age of Hezekiah. It differs from the other parts of Zechariah (1) in historical situation, which is in the last days of the northern kingdom ; (2) in style and language, especially in its poetical structure and spirit ; (3) in its theological conception. There are several important Messianic ideas in this beautiful trimeter poem. These are in many Tespects presupposed in the corresponding predictions of Isaiah and Micah.^ It would seem that this section, together with the section chaps, xii.-xiv., by a post-exilic 1 C. H. H, Wright, in his Zechariah and his Prophecies coTisidered in relation to Modern Criticism, London 1879, does not succeed in removing the objections to the traditional view. Stade in ZeitschHft f. alttest. Wissenschaft, 1882, rightly sees that Zech. xii.-xiv. is post-exilic, but does not sufficiently estimate the differences between this section and the one now under consideration. We cannot enter on the discussion here ; see OreUi in I.e. p. 251 seq. We put the Messianic predictions in their historical order, and this presents one line of argument for the proper historic situation. 184 MESSIANIC PROPHECY. author other than Zechariah, were appended to Zechariah in order to make the four books of the prophets symme- trical in length. The same was the case with the addi- tions to Isaiah/ It should always he remembered that the twelve lesser prophets were in ancient times treated as a single book. n. THE KING OF PEACE. § 55. Zion rejoices at the advent of her king, who comes mech and yet victorious, riding upon the foal of an ass. He has destroyed the wecqoons of war^ and reigns in 'peace over the earth. " Exult greatly, O daughter of Zion ; Shout for joy, O daughter of Jerusalem : Lo, thy king cometh to thee : Bighteous and victorious ^ is he ; Lowly, and riding upon an ass, Even upon a colt, the foal of an ass. And I will cut ofif the chariot from Ephraim, And the horse from Jerusalem, And the battle bow wiU be cut ofif ; And he will speak peace to the nations ; And his rule will be from sea to sea. And from the Biver unto the ends of earth." — Zech. ix. 9, 10. This prediction presents the same essential idea as the prophecy just considered, ]\Iicah iv. 1-5. The establish- ment of universal peace is there attributed to the exalta- tion of the temple, and here it is attributed to the \ictory of the Messianic king ; but the theme of both predictions 1 See p. 192. 2 ytJ^j is Niph. part, of J?ir\ save, and is " one saved," e.g. by God and hence triumphant, victorious, Isa. xlv. 17 ; Deut. xxxiii. 29. "Having salvation" of the B.V. is hardly correct. The margin, " having victory," is better. ISAIAH AND HIS CONTEMPORAEIES. 185 is universal and everlasting peace. It is probable that both pieces came from the same unknown prophet. The king is here presented in somewhat different features from the king of the Psalter.^ There the glory and power of the king were emphasized. Here the king's humility and righteousness. He rides upon the ass, the animal of peace, because the war-horses have been destroyed. The representation is nearest to that of Ps. Ixxii. We have here the original of the repre- sentations of Isaiah and Micah.^ m. KESTOEATION THROUGH THE SEA TROUBLE. § 5Q. Israel and Judah will he restored from exile to their own land. Jahveh will hring them from Egy;pt and Assyria ly means of great wonders, and they will dwell in the lands of Gilead and Lebanon, and walk in the name of Jahveh. This passage continues the previous prophecy, and predicts the restoration of Israel and Judah after exile. I. " When ^ Jahveh Sabaoth hath visited His flock, the house of Judah, He will make them as his war-horse * in the battle ; From him is the corner-stone, from him the tent-pin, From him is the battle-bow, From him comes forth every oppressor, together. And they will become as heroes trampling under foot In the mire of the streets, in the battle ; And they will fight when ^ Jahveh is with them, 1 Pss. ex., ii., xlv. See §§ 43, 44, 45, 46. ^ Isa. ix. 1-7, xi. 1-9 ; Micah v. 2-5. ^ It is best to take '>3 in both of these cases as having temporal force rather than causal. ^ "iTin DID = his majestic horse in the battle, reminds one of the war-horse of Job xxxix. 20. C. H. H. Wright renders state-horse. The context favours war-horse. 186 MESSIANIC PROPHECY. Aod tlie riders on horses will be put to shame. 1 And I will strengthen the house of Judah, ' And the house of Josej^h will I save. i II. And I will restore ^ them, for I have compassion on them, \ And will become as when I did not cast them oflf : j For I, Jahveh, am their God ; yea, I will answer them.* | And Ephraim vdU. become like a hero, ; And their lieart will rejoice as with wine ; And their sons will see and be glad ; Let ^ their heart exult m Jahveh. ; I will hiss for them, and I will gather them ; When I have redeemed them, they will multiply as they didi multiply ; * And I will scatter them ^ among the peoples, '^ And in the distant parts they will remember me, < And live with their sons, and return. i III. And I will restore them from the laud of Egj^pt, j And from Assyria will I gather them ; J And unto the land of Gilead will they come, ; And to Lebanon will I brmg them ; '.| And room will not be found for tliem. 1 And he will pass through the sea Trouble,® rj And smite the sea Billows, j And put to shame all the gulfs of the Nile ; And the pride of AssjTia will be brought low, And the sceptre will depart from Egypt. ^ CniDK^n is a composite form which has arisen from a doubt; whether it was D^"^3i^'1^ from 2^'' or D>nu^L^^■t from 2)1^. Thai LXX. read the former, and is followed by the margin of R.V.j after Gesenius, Hengstenberg, Chambers, et al. The Yulgatej and Peshitto read the latter, and are followed by Ewald. This is better, as at the beginning of the next strophe. 2 The 1 used with D^yxi should be noted. It is the intensive "|. ; * 73'» is jussive in form and should have a jussive meaning. So' C. H. H. Wright properly renders it. j * The multiplication of Israel in the future is based upon theiri multiplication in former days. I ^ This expression reminds us of Hos. i. 6 seq. ^ Water is a frequent figure of trouble and distress both fori individuals and nations, see Ps. Ixix. 2 and Isa. xvii. 12. i ISAIAH AND HIS CONTEMPOKAEIES. 187 And I will strengthen them in Jahveh ; And in his name will they walk about, is the utterance of Jahveh." — Zech. x. 3-12. This is a prediction of an ultimate victory of the house of Judah and the house of Joseph combined in a struggle against their common enemies. Under the leadership of Jahveh Sabaoth they become heroic, and like the war- horse trample under foot all who resist them. Ephraim is to go into exile and be scattered as seed in distant parts, in Egypt and Assyria. He is to pass through the sea wliich is called Trouble and Billows, but he will be restored from Egypt and Assyria and will walk in the name of Jahveh.^ rV. THE REJECTED SHEPHERD. 5 7. Tlic good She'pherd, Jahveh, rejects His flock Israel, He has heen estimated, hy them at the miserable jprice of a slave. These poor wages are rejected, and the Shepherd's staves, heaiity and concord, are broken as a symbol of the separation. The previous context describes the evil shepherds destroying the flock for their own advantage, and closes with the resolution of Jahveh to act as the shepherd of 1 This piece is intermediate in its representations between Hosea on the one side and Isaiah and Micah on the other. The reference to the house of Judah and the house of Joseph is after the manner of Hos. i. 6, 7. The scattering and multiplication of Israel is like Hos. i. 4, 10, ii. 23. The sea Trouble resembles the Vale of the Troubler of Hos. ii. 15. On the other hand, the reference to the northern frontier, Gilead and Lebanon, corresponds with the refer- ence to the land of Zebulun and Naphtali, Perea and district of the nations, in Isa. ix. 1. The restoration from Egypt and Assyria resembles Hos, xi. 10, 11, but it is much nearer Isa. xi. 15, 16. The walking in the name of Jahveh resembles Micah iv. 2-5. It seems to us that essentially the same historic situation must be at the basis of these predictions, and that our passage is intermediate between Hosea and Isaiah. 188 MESSIAiaC PROPHECY. this most miserable flock, wHcli is about to be led to the slaughter. I. " And I took me two staves, One I called Beauty,^ And the other I called Concord ; ^ And I served as shepherd of the flock, And destroyed the three shepherds in one month ; And my soul became weary with them, And their soul also loathed me. ] And I said, I will not be your shepherd ; ! The one about to die will die, j And the one to be destroyed will be destroyed, \ And the rest will devour j Each the flesh of his companion. II. And I took my staff Beauty, ^ And cut it asunder, j To break the covenant > That I had concluded vnth all peoples. • 1 And it was broken in that day : And the most miserable sheep knew it was so^ ' Those who regard me — \ That it was the word of Jahveh, And I said unto them. If it seem good to you, ' Give me my hire ; > And if not, leave it. , m. And they weighed my hire thirty silverlings, And Jahveh said unto me, Cast it out for the potter : The lordly price That I am prized at of them. ^ D^J = beauty, loveliness, the endearing name of the relation o| the shepherd to the flock. It is j^urely ideal of what the relation; ought to be. i ^ Dv2n is an abstract intensive plural, meaning, concord (soj Ewald renders, " Eintracht "). It is usually rendered as bands orj bonds. Orelli renders " confederacy." j ISAIAH AND HIG CONTEMPOKAEIES. 189 And I took the thirty silverlings, And cast it out In the house of God for the potter. And I cut asunder my second staff, The Concord, To break the brotherhood Between Judah and Israel." — Zech. xi. 7-14. This passage is given by the interpreters generally in the prose form. They are led to do so on the theory that we have here a narrative of what the prophet did in obedience to the command. But the entire piece is a poem of the trimeter movement and of the same strophical organization. In fact, it was impossible for the prophet to illustrate the command of Jahveh in symbolic action. He could take the staves and then break them. He might induce some one to give him the thirty silverlings, and then could cast them away. But these are a very small portion of the shepherd's com- mission. He is to act as shepherd. He cuts off three other shepherds, probably the kings of the time. He is accepted as a shepherd for a season and then afterwards is rejected, and the money is given him as his hire. The shepherd of Israel is Jahveh the King, and can be no one else.^ This piece involves the coexistence of the two kingdoms of Judah and Israel. It relates to the final ruin of the kingdom of Israel on account of their rejection of the sovereignty of Jahveh. There is a striking resemblance to Hosea in the silverlings, the price of a slave. Hosea gives this as the price paid by Jahveh for Israel when she was redeemed from her bondage as a slave concubine. It is here the price that Israel pays for the care that Jahveh had exercised over them. The staff Beauty is the symbol of the estimation in which Jahveh held His people. It is parallel with the faithful 1 See C. H. H. Wright in I.e. p. 304. 190 MESSIANIC PEOPHECY. love of Jahveh as represented by Hosea. The staff Concord is the symbol of the brotherly union between Israel and Judah. Hosea represents that this brother- hood will again be recognized in the final restoration. The same conception recurs in Ezekiel/ The rejection of the shepherd Jahveh, and of the people of Israel by Jahveh, is similar to the mutual rejection of husband and wife in Hosea.^ Isaiah, Isaiah is beyond question the greatest of the Old Testament prophets. In a prophetic activity extending through a long period of varied experiences and historical changes, he has given us one of the grandest monuments of inspired thought and utterance. Isaiah was a many- sided man, indeed we might say all-sided, for his peculi- arities consist not in individualities of style or thought, but in that he combines in his fully rounded character the excellences of all who had gone before him, adopting and building into the system of his prophecy the best thoughts of his contemporaries and predecessors, yet with such an originality and appropriateness of setting that no one could regard him as a copyist or a plagiarist. " He is not the especially lyrical prophet, or the especially elegiacal prophet, or the especially oratorical and horta- tory prophet, as we should describe a Joel, a Hosea, a Micah, with whom there is a greater prevalence of some 1 See § 82. ^ This i);i.ss;ige is applied to the betrayal of Jesus by Judas in Matt, xxvii. 5. Jesus the Messiah is the divine Shepherd, who was rejected and sold into bondage for this miserable price. The correspondence, in fact, is not owing to the precision of the prophetic prediction, but is owing to the correspondence in situation between the rejected Jahveh of the times of the decay of the northern kingdom of Israel and the rejected Messiah of the New Testament. The prophecy of the rejected shepherd is here not direct prophecy but simply and alone typical. ISAIAH AND HIS CONTEMPOKARIES. 191 particular colour ; but, just as the subject requires, he has readily at command every different kind of style and every different change of delineation ; and it is precisely this that, in point of language, establishes his greatness, as well as in general forms one of his most towering points of excellence. His only fundamental peculiarity is the lofty majestic calmness of his style, proceeding out of the perfect command which he feels that he possesses over his subject-matter." ^ The prophecies of Isaiah cover a wide range, both as to subject-matter and as to form. His prophecies relate to Israel, and the nations brought into relations with her. They spring up out of the circumstances of the historical present in order to leap forth into the most distant future. No prophet sees more clearly and describes more vividly the Messiah and His times. The Book of Isaiah is a collection of several groups of prophecies by Isaiah himself, to which have been attached other anonymous prophecies, which are in his spirit and style, from his own times and also from the period of the exile. It is first necessary to eliminate those that rejflect the situation of the exile. These recognise that Babylon is the great enemy, and that deliverance from Babylon is the great Messianic blessing ; whereas Isaiah is the great prophet of the Assyrian period. The sections to be removed are (1) xiii.— xiv. 23 ; (2) xxiv.-xxvii. ; (3) xxxiv.-xxxv. ; (4) the great prophecy contained in chaps, xl.-lxvi. It seems that these anonymous pro- phecies were gathered about the name of Isaiah as the sentences of wisdom were grouped about the name of Solomon, the psalms about the name of David, and the laws about the name of Moses. These pieces differ from the writings of Isaiah in style, historic situation, theology ^ Ewald, Die Propheten des alten BundeSy i. p. 280, Gottingen 1867-68. 192 MESSIANIC PKOPHECT. and conception, altliough they resemble him in spirit, and approj)riate not a few of liis ideas.-^ Limiting ourselves to the genuine prophecies of Isaiah, they may be arranged in three groups. (1) Chaps, i-xii These relate to di\dne judgments upon Judah and Israel. There were two successive editings of this group by Isaiah or his disciples. Chaps, ii-v. were first pubhshed, and then the larger collection. Chaps. vi.-xii. were appended, and chap. i. was made the introduction to the whole. (2) Chaps, xiv. 24-xxiii. This is a group of messages against the surrounding nations : Philistia, Moab, Damascus, Israel, Ethiopia, Egypt, Babylon, Edom, Arabia, Tyre and the valley of vision (Jerusalem). (3) Chaps. xx\dii.— xxxiii. give a group of woes upon Israel and Judah in view of certain definite transgressions.^ In the first group of the prophecies of Isaiah there ^ The unity of Isaiah is still stoutly defended by many scholars, who prefer to adhere to the traditional view with all its difficulties, rather than follow the methods of the higher criticism, and accept its results. The same essential principles are involved in the literary analysis of Isaiah as in the literary analysis of the Pentateuch, the Psalter, and the Book of Proverbs and the "Wisdom literature generally. Tradition has ascribed these gi'oups of wi-itings to the four gi'eatest names in Hebrew literary history. But literary and historical criticism in all these cases has disclosed gi^oups of writings of different authors and different times. This literary analysis has disturbed many traditional opinions that seem to have had no other origin than pure conjecture ; but it has enabled us to undei-stand the historic origin of the several writings, has given the key to their correct interpretation, and lias showTi the wondrous variety of form and content in Hebrew literature. The develojiment of the inspired literature and the(»logy is now beginning to disclose itself with a wealth of meaning which was unknown to those who in an uncritical age imposed their conjectures upon the word of God, and which escapes those who allow themselves to be blinded by these human conjectures and traditions to the real facts and truths of the Scriptures themselves. We have no space here to discuss the question. We shall arrange the ^vTitings in their historic order, and let the development of the Messianic idea give its own testimony. See especially Chap. X. ^ See W. II. Smith, FropJiets of Israel^ p. 210 seq. ISAIAH AND HIS CONTEMPORAKIES. 193 is a considerable amount of Messianic material. The first prediction is a quotation from the older prophet that we have already considered ^ with the concluding exhortation — " house of Israel, come ye, And let us walk in the hght of Jahveh." — Isa. ii. 5. The Messianic idea of Isaiah is first opened up in Chap. IV. V. PURIFICATION OF ZION. § 58. Jahveh will come to refine and purify His people, so that the remnant will become holy and blessed. The land will become wonderfully fruitful^ and it will be frotected by the abiding presence of Jahveh. "In that day the sprout of Jahveh will become splendid and glorious. And the fruit of the land will become majestic and illustrious for the rescued of Israel. And it will come to pass, that, as for the residue in Zion, and the remainder in Jerusalem, They will be called holy,^— all who are inscribed unto life in Jerusalem. When Adonay shall have washed away the filth of the daughters of Zion, And the blood of Jerusalem shall put away » from her midst by the spirit of judgment, and by the spirit of burning. Jahveh will create'^ upon all the established places of Mount Zion, and upon her places of convocation, A cloud by day, and smoke and brightness of flame of fire by night : * See § 54. ^ ^^ IDt^^ belongs to the style of Hosea, Isaiah, and the great prophet of the exile, instead of the usual -^ K"ipV See xix. 18. ^ nn for the usual m2, used only here, Jer. U. 34, Ezek. xl. 38, and 2 Chron. iv. 6. * i^-ia, a strong word, seldom used in pre-exilic literature. N 194 MESSIANIC PEOPHECT. For upon all the glory a canopy and a pavilion ^ will appear For a shade by day from heat, and for a ref age and shelter 2 from storm and from rain." — Isa. iv. 2-6. This prediction is of great importance. It really opens up two new phases of the Messianic idea. It lays stress upon the discipline of the people of God themselves, and also upon a holy remnant to be redeemed from the fiery trials about to destroy the nation as a whole. A new line is opened for the doctrine of the advent of Jahveh. There is a judgment, not upon the nations as in Joel,^ but upon perverse Israel after the manner of Hosea.'* Israel is disciplined and then restored. The restoration is through a fiery trial. It is for the washing away of filth in order to purity, beauty and holiness. The blessings of the advent are (1) wonderful fruitfulness of the holy land, usually associ- ated with the divine advent ; ^ (2) the purity and holiness of the people of God, a favourite conception of Isaiah, which is dwelt upon in subsequent prophecy ; (3) Jahveh dwelling with His people for ever. This conception is always associated with the advent of Jahveh. Here, however, the symbolism is taken from the history of the exodus.® The pillar of cloud and ^ n3D, for the dwelling-place of God, Ps. xviii. 2. "Iino^, a late word, only here for "in D. We would expect npv over against Dl'', but it was omitted probably in order to doubling the epithets. 3 See § 51. ■» See § 53. * There has been some dispute as to the meaning of " Sprout of Jahveh ; " some refer it to the Messianic shoot of Isa. xi. 1, Jer. xxiii. 5, and Zech, iii. 8, vi. 12 ; but the shoot in these cases is the shoot of David and from the stump of Jesse. Here the shoot is the shoot of Jahveh. The parallelism "fruit of the land" favours the reference of " Sprout of Jahveh " to the sprouting forth of the land under the reviving influence of Jahveh, as is usual in predictions of the divine advent. The representation would then be essentially the same as Joel iii. 18 and Hos. ii. 22. « Ex. xiv. 19 seq. ISAIAH AND HIS CONTEMPORARIES. 195 fire ^ is to be renewed. A divine canopy will protect Israel from all harm. VI. IMMANUEL. § 59. A wonderful child vnll he horn of a young woman, and he named Immanuel. He is the sign and pledge that Jahveh is with His people, and that He will deliver them. Distress will continue in the land until His maturity. The invasion of Judah by the allied Syrians and Israelites, and the great distress resulting therefrom, were the occasion of the prediction of the wonderful child Immanuel. Ahaz the king of Judah is challenged by the prophet Isaiah to ask a sign from Jahveh, with the range of choice from Sheol to heaven. When he declines to ask, a sign is promised by Jahveh Himself. " Hear now, O house of David ; Is it too little for you to weary men, that you should weary my God also? Therefore Jahveh ^ Himself will give you a sign ; Lo, young woman,^ thou art pregnant, 1 See § 51. 2 t^in is emphatic = himself. Some MSS., followed by Lowth and Cheyne, read nirT* for ""Jlx. The divine name seems unnecessary. ^ riD^yn is a young, marriageable woman, whether virgin or not. rb\r\2. is the usual word for virgin and nS^X for wife, but T\t2hv ^^J be either. The article is taken by some as designed to point out the woman as a distinct and conspicuous one. But then the question arises, What woman ? Some then think of the wife of the prophet on the ground that his children were appointed to be signs to Israel (Isa. viii. 18). Ewald takes the article as generic ; but there seems to be no propriety for such a usage here. It is better to take the article as the sign of the vocative, O thou young woman. This is favoured by the HKIp, which is pointed as 2 fern. And it is thus rendered by LXX. Aquilla and Symmachus. nxip is taken by Gesen. § 74. 1 ; Ewald, § 194 ; Delitzsch, et at, as a secondary form of the 3 fem. for the usual nX"ip. But this is improbable. If it were pointed {^^'Ji^, it might refer to Ahaz as subject; but that is 196 MESSIANIC PROPHECY. and about to bear a son, and call his name Immanuel.^ Curds and honey will he eat at ^ the time of his knowing to refuse ^ evil and choose good. For before the boy knows to refuse evil and choose good, the land, because of whose two kings thou art anxious, will be abandoned."— Isa. vii. 13-17. Under the solemn circumstances of this prediction one would expect something more than the birth of a child in the family of Ahaz or of Isaiah, or in some unknown household. The significance of the sign is in the child and his name, and not in the mother. The Hebrew word might mean a virgin, but it does not in itself convey the idea of virginity. If the prophet wished to emphasize virginity, he would doubtless have used another and a more definite term. The child bears the significant name Lamanuel, 'El is with us. The child is a sign or pledge that God is with His people. It was not so much to convince Ahaz that the predicted events would surely follow in the captivity of Syria and Samaria by the Assyrians, with the desolation of the land of Judah ; but rather that, in the- midst of these calamities, God would abide with His people. The child is not represented as the incarnate God, but as the pledge of the divine deliverance. The deliverance was unlikely. The Syriac and N. T. citation translate as if they read j<-|p. Prof. Toy prefers the participle nX"ip in accordance with m^\ This is better if the subject is to be the 3 fern. But we should then have three participles in co-ordination. ^ bx 13^rV is compounded of h^, the divine name, and l^rDy = with us, and thus the child's name is 'El is ivith us. It does not affirm the divinity of the child, but that the child bears this name as the sign or pledge of the divine presence. Indeed "liT'pin = strength of Jahveh, is a similar use of the divine name. If Hezekiah were not too old, he might be regarded as in the mind of the prophet at the time. ^ in VIP. The ^ denotes the point of time, Ewald, § 21 7(/, 2 ; Lowth, Delitzsch, Diestel, Cheyne, et al. It can hardly express pnrjiose here. ^ DIX^ and linn. These infinitives absolute are used for the classic infins. construct, a usage which begins with Isaiah. ISAIAH AND HIS CONTEMPORARIES. 197 not to be wrought at the birth of the child, for the infancy was to pass in hardship. He would be com- pelled to live upon curds and honey, the products of a land that had become a wilderness, a place for shepherds and their flocks. The affliction of the land was to con- tinue until the maturity of Immanuel. This pledge was given in a period of impending distress. It remained a predicted pledge until the birth of the Messiah. There is no reason why we should seek a fulfilment of the sign in the time of Ahaz. It is a sign which was expressly assigned to the future. It matters little whether the prophet or his hearers looked for a speedy fulfilment. It was not for them to measure the times and intervals of the divine plan of redemption. If they looked for the birth of such a son in the time of Ahaz or Hezekiah, they were disappointed. There is no historical evidence of any such birth or of any such child. The names assigned to the children of the prophet are plain enough, but there is no connection of this name with any of his children. If, however, any one should prefer to think that a child of the prophet or the royal house bore this name as a sign, the prediction would then become typical and cease to be direct prediction, but the Messianic idea would not be lost. This Immanuel would be a type of the great Immanuel, just as David and Moses and Solomon and others have been such types of the Messiah. The passage is a Messianic passage, and the prelude to the predictions of the Messianic king which follow in Isaiah and in Micah. Isaiah subsequently gives the child to be born many sacred names ; and Micah points to the mother in Bethlehem.^ The affliction from the Syrians was followed by an Assyrian period of affliction. The Assyrian was followed by the Babylonian, the Babylonian by the Greek, and the Greek by the Eoman. 1 Isa. ix. 6, xi. 1 seq. ; Micah v. 3. 198 MESSIANIC PROPHECY. These world - powers rose successively to afflict Israel. Isaiah predicts the approach of the Assyrian affliction, he sees no farther. But he projects into the future the divine pledge in the child Immanuel as a comfort to the faithful remnant in Judah. This pledge remained as the abiding prediction of comfort through all the subsequent periods of affliction until the Messiah was born of the Virgin Mary.-^ VII. THE PRINCE OF PEACE, § 60. ^ great light was to shine upon the north-eastern frontier of Israel, exalting the people as highly as they had been previously humiliated, as the first of the Israelites to go into exile. A great deliverance will he wrought, tran- scending that of Gideon in the day of Midian. A child of the house of David will he horn, a7id hear the names, Wonder- ful Counsellor, Divine Hero, Distributor of Spoils, and Prince of Peace. He will reign on the throne of David in righteousness for ever. All military equipments will he destroyed in order to universal peace. The invasion of Israel and the carrying away into captivity of the inhabitants of Galilee and Perea by Tiglath Pilezer ^ was the historical basis of the prediction of the Prince of Peace. A thick darkness overshadows the land, and the people are plunged into despair ; they are the first of the Israelites to go into captivity, and to suffer its deep humiliation. They are accordingly the first to be exalted, and their exaltation will be as high as their humiliation was deep. " But she who now has trouble will not have gloom. As the former time brought into contempt the land of Zebulon and the land of Naphtali ; 1 Matt. i. 21 25. « 2 Kings xv. 29. ISAIAH AND HIS CONTEMPORARIES. 199 The last time will certainly ^ bring to honour the way of the sea, beyond Jordan, the district of the nations. The people that walk in darkness do see a great light : Those dwelling in a land of dense darkness, light doth shine upon them. Thou hast increased the nation whose joy thou didst not ^ increase ; They rejoice before thee as the joy in the harvest, According as men exult when they divide spoil. For the yoke of his burden, and the staff of his shoulder, The rod of the one oppressing him, thou hast broken oflf as in the day of Midian. For as regards every piece of armour ^ of the one arming himself with clatter, and garment rolled in blood, ^ There is a contrast between an earlier affliction and a later blessing, in the first line of the strophe. It is then expanded in the two following lines. It is then still further expanded in the remainder of the strophe. The movement of the poetry is hexa- meter. 2 The E.Y. follows the Qeri t>y but the A.V. translates the Kethihh ^. The Babylonian codex agrees with the Western codices here. The Peshitto, Targum, and Saadia agree with the Qeri ; but Symmachus and the Vulgate are with the Kethihh. The LXX. renders, to 'TrMiarou rou "hxov 6 KXT'/iyw/Si h £u(^povvvy} aov. The documentary evidence favours the Kethihh, and the Versions are divided. Following the LXX., se^^eral modern critics change the text to T^r\, Selwyn and Studer, or n^Jn, as Krochmal, Eobertson Smith and Cheyne. The Qeri is easy ; but the 'h would be in an unnatural position, and apparently superfluous to the sense and the rhythm. If we render, "Whose joy thou didst not increase," as Hitzig, Eeinke, Hengst. et at., we have a contrast which is in accord with viii. 23. Orelli follows the Kethihh, but takes nnDtJTl as nominative of the clause. The sp is the more difficult reading, and is to be preferred on that account. The three great principles of textual criticism count for K'p. 3 pj^D is only found here in Hebrew. The Versions and authori- ties greatly differ. The LXX. renders aToAij, and thinks of a word like the Syriac zayno, from zayen, to arm. This is followed by Hitzig, Reinke, Knobel, Diestel, et al. It has the oldest authority in its favour, and is in accordance with the context. The Peshitto read it, however, pxti' = tumult ; Saadia, the Vulgate and Targum render in various ways, showing their doubt as to the form. Joseph Kimchi suggested the meaning shoe, after the Aramic po. This has been followed by most recent interpreters. We prefer to f oUow the LXX. 200 MESSIANIC PEOPllECY. It will be for burning, the fuel of fire. For a child is born to us, a son is given to us ; and the rule is upon his shoulder. And his name is called Wonderful Counsellor, Divine Hero, Dis- tributor of Spoils,^ Prince of Peace ; For the increase of his rule and for peace without end upon the throne of David and over his kingdom, To establish it, and to confirm it in justice and righteousness from henceforth even for ever. The zeal of Jahveh Sabaoth will do this." — Isa. viii. 23-ix. 6. The prophet sees a great light shining on the north- eastern frontier of the land which had been the fiist to suffer the humiliation of captivity. This indicates a great deliverance, which transcends the victory gained by Gideon over the Midianites in the plain of Jezreel. The nation will reap the harvest of \dctory, and rejoice in the division of the spoils. The victory will be so complete that all the military equipments will be burned up in order to the establishment of universal peace. The factory has been gained by a prince of the house of David. ^ 1]) ""DX is usually rendered " Everlasting Father," either think- ing of the fatherly rule of the Messiah as an everlasting one (Delitzsch, Cheyne and Orelli), or as attributing a divine attribute to the Messiah, as the Everlasting One. Dathe and Chambers take 3X as a noun of relation as in Arabic, and render, possessor of the attribute of eternity. But the Messianic king is not so closely identified with Jahveh in the development of the idea. It is best to take 3i< as a noun of relation, and with Hitzig, Knobel, Diestel, Kayser, Kuenen, et ah, think of "ly in the sense of booti/, as in Isa. xxxiii. 23, Gen. xlix. 27, Zeph. iii. 8 ; so that the meaning is, owner, possessor, or distributor of booty. This is most suited to the context, which lays great stress upon the rejoicing in the spoils of the victory. It is best suited to the order of the Messianic titles. The climax is the Prince of Peace, as parallel with the destruction of the weapons of war. This is preceded naturally by Distributor of Booty, as parallel with the joy in the division of the spoils above. The rise in thought is then clear — (1) the Wonderful Counsellor — the planning of the campaign and the direction of the battle ; (2) the Divine Hero, the warrior with divine majesty, valour and irresistible power, in the conflict itself ; (3) the Distributor of Booty after the conflict ; and (4) the Prince of Peace, in the everlasting reign of the Messiah. ISAIAH AND HIS CONTEMPORARIES. 201 Names of honour are heaped upon him to indicate his glorious part in the conflict. The names are four — (1) He is a Wonderful Counsellor. The victory is due to his wise plans and his marvellous skill in conducting the battle. His wisdom in counsel shines like a great light in the land he has delivered. (2) He is a Divine Hero, a heroic 'El. He has proved himself a hero, a valiant warrior and irresistible conqueror. He has displayed godlike prowess. He has carried on the campaign with godlike majesty and glory. He has surpassed the mar- vellous victory of Gideon. (3) He is a Distributor of Spoils, His victory has been so great, that the spoils are vast. He distributes them to his people, and they greatly rejoice in the rich rewards of the victory. (4) He is above all a Prince of Peace. The victory has been a decisive one ; so decisive, that all the armour has been consumed with fire. There is no further need of weapons. He is to reign as the Prince of Peace, and secure everlasting peace. This representation of the Prince of Peace is an enlargement of Zech. ix.'^ The destruction of the weapons of war is after the example of Hos. ii.^ The everlasting reign on the throne of David is in accordance with the royal Messianic Psalms.* This Prince of Peace is no other than Jesus Christ.* VIII. THE FRUITFUL SHOOT. § 61. A twig comes forth from the stump of Jesse, a shoot from his roots hears fruit. The sevenfold gifts of the divine Spirit rest upon him, endowing him to fidfil his 1 See p. 184. 2 gee p. 171. ^ Ps. ii., ex., and especially Ixxii. See pp. 132-140. * The evangelist Matthew sees this great light shining in the ministry of Jesus in Galilee, Matt. iv. 15, 16. 202 MESSIANIC PROPHECY. work of judging the 'poor with spiritual discernment, and the wicked vjith the rod of his mouth. Girded with right- eousness and faithfulness, He estaUisJies universal peace in the earth, in which the animal kingdom shares. The knowledge of Jalivch becomes universal. The shoot becomes the standard about ivhich the Tiat: ns rally. The strife of Ephraim and Jiidah will come to an end. A great deliverance from Egypt and Assyria will take place, and the people of God return to their land on a highway of redemption. The invasion of Judah by the Assyrians was the occasion of the prediction of the wonderful shoot. The Assyrian was the rod of Jahveh's anger. He continued to afflict Judah until the nation became a mere stump in the ground. Then Assyria, having served the divine purpose, will perish. But the stump will put forth a shoot that will be fruitful and abide for ever. I. " And a twig will come forth from the stump of Jesse, And a shoot from his roots will be fruitful ; And the spirit of Jahveh will rest upon him, The spirit of wisdom and understanding, The spirit of counsel and might, The spirit of knowledge and the fear of Jahveh.^ And not according to the sight of his eyes will he judge, And not according to the hearing of his ears will he admonish ; But he will judge in righteousness the weak, And administer equity to the meek of the land, ^ The Massoretic text gives another line here. But it is doubtful. Bickell suggests that it has arisen by repetition from the previous line, — an easy error of a scribe, as is manifest when the lines are written one above the other — nin^ nj<-i'n innni If it be retained, it is the Hiph. infin. of nil, and is to be rendered, *' his scenting," or "smelling, will be of the fear of Jahveh." ^ This use of the form is unexampled, and Cheyne is probably correct in follow- ing Bickell. The omission of this line makes the strophe consist of fourteen lines, a very common strophe for trimeters. ISAIAH AND HIS CONTEMPORARIES. 203 And smite the terrible ^ witli the sceptre of his mouth, And with the breath of his lips will he slay the wicked And righteousness will be the girdle of his loins, And faithfulness the girdle of his waist. II. And the wolf will dwell with the lamb, And the leopard lie down with the kid, And the calf and young lion and fatling together, And a little child be leader over them. And the cow and bear will graze : Together will their young lie down, And a lion like the ox will eat straw ; And a suckling will play over the hole of the asp, And over the light hole ^ of the great viper ^ The weaned child will have stretched out his hand.* And they will not harm or destroy In all my holy mountain. For the earth will have been filled with knowing ^ Jahveh, As the waters are covering the sea. III. And in that day the root of Jesse will appear. Which is about to stand as a banner of the peoples. Unto him will nations resort ; And the place of his resting will become glorious. And it will come to pass in that day, Adonay will a second time stretch forth his hand. To get the remnant of his people, 1 Krochmal, Lagarde and Cheyne rightly regard y'*']]} as the correct reading instead of p5<. There seems to be no proper contrast between the earth and the weak, as there is between the meek and wicked. p"ij; would be the most suitable word over against the ^ mii^D is a noun formed by D from "ilj?. It is the place of light, or light hole. ^ ""JiySV is, according to Tristram, the great viper. * mn is only found here. It is probably equivalent to rnS to put out the hand. The perfect tense is singular in this connection. It is explained by Ewald, Bottcher, et al., as an exam]:)le of the omission of 1 consec. of perfect ; by Driver as a prophetic perfect. But it is better to regard it as a future perfect in order to bring out the fact that the child will remain alive and unharmed after doing this daring thing. * njn, fern, of yi ; for the proper infin. r\V% see Hab. ii. 14. 204 MESSIANIC PROPHECY. Which remain from Asshur, And from Egypt, and from Pathros, and from Ciish, And from Elam, and from Shinar, and from Hamath ; ^ And will lift up a banner to the nations, And collect the outcasts of Israel, And the dispersed of Israel will he gather From the four corners of the earth. rV. And the jealousy of Ephraim will depart, And the adversaries of Judah will be cut off; Ephraim will not be jealous of Judah, And Judah will not distress Ephraim, And they will fly upon the shoulders of the Philistines seaward, Together they will spoil the sons of the East, Edom and Moab will become a prize of their hand,^ And the sons of Ammon will become their subjects, And Jahveh will put under a ban the tongue of the Egyptian sea. And wave his hand over the river with his violent blast,* And smite it into seven channels, And cause them to go over dry shod ; And a highway will be for the remnant of the people who wiU be left from Assyria, As it was to Israel in the day of his going up from the land of Egypt." The wonderful shoot springs from the stump of Jesse and becomes exceedingly fruitful ; for he is endowed with all the graces of the divine Spirit. These graces are arranged in three pairs, with a single introductory one : — (1) Wisdom and understanding, the internal compre- ^ D"'n ^"'{