UC-NRLF !!|f!lil!!!ll|!|lll|||'lil!IIll B 3 T2S 13S imp I ^ :^ ("n:-.- t' 70i^€r^- ^^u:^^ REESE LIBRARY OS- UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA. Received 4^^/^y^ Shelf No.. >J -/ / LETTERS. 2* woi- th ^T" W ^'C*yPla^ t-f^l^^^^^-l-J^ /C_A.r>rr_si^ AlOwX -y^ni^w^t//^ /iiArff L E T T E R S J) A \ I D H U M E, EXTRACTS FROM LETTF.RS REFERRING TO IIIM. I'DITKU RV THOMAS MURRAY, LL.D., Al TIIOR OF ' TllK I.ITLRARV HISTORV OF GAI.LUWAY.' EDINBURGH: PUBLISHED BY ADAM AND CHARLES BLACK. MUCCCXLI. JTacSittule oi'the ffdndivriting of lord Karnes L E T T E U S 1) AVID H U M E, EXTRACTS FROM LETTERS REFERRING TO IILM. EDITKD in THOMAS MURRAY, LL.D., Al THOR OF ' THE LITERARY IIISTOKV OF GALLOWAY. EDINBURGH: PUBLISHED BY ADAM AND CILVRLES BLACK. MUCCCXLl. 14J i^'e*^Pla<^ t-ny^C-^^^^-^^iS^ /C.AJ-Vrz__ft^ nt .\hilosophy and polite letters to enter into, all 47 of a sudden, and unprepared ! But I can laugh, whatever happens ; and the newness of such practices rather diverts me. At first they caus'd indignation and hatred ; and even (tho' I am asham''d to confess it,) melancholy and sorrow. ' Your friend has recovered his colic ; but is fallen into a fit of very low spirits and vapours. I wish this may not hold him long. I know not whether you wou'd choose to come out, while he is in this condition. You may command the chaise and horses at any time. I am, Sir, with great re- gard, your most obedient humble Servant, ' Saturday. ' David Hume.' 'Sir, ' I am desir'd by my Lord to make his compliments to you, and to express his concern for your illness. I hope it is now over in a great measure. My Lord himself does not recover so well as cou'd be wisht. Your company wou'd always be agreeable here ; but more so at present, as it wouM be a mark of your total recovery. I am. Dear Sir, your most obedient Servant, ' Tuesday, 11 o'clock. ' David Hume.' 'Sir, ' Your friend is almost entirely recovered, and is now well in every respect. You may command the horses and chaise any time you'll please to order them. I am. Sir, your most obedient humble Servant, ' Friday evening. 'David Hume.' 'Sir, ' I have little more to say to you than that 48 your friend continues still in good health and good humour. I informed you of his recovery by a letter dated on Tuesday last, which I sent in the common way, and which I find has not reaclit you in the course of post. I shall put this into the post-house myself. 'Tis remarkable, that four days is just the time requisite for a letter to go to town, to come back hither, and to return again to town. If the same difference happen with regard to this letter and the last, it will amount to a demonstration. Good God ! ! ! I only wish these letters had not been directed to you ; for, as to their being seen, it is not, in my opinion, a farthing's matter. ' I believe I shall be in town on Monday or Tuesday, when I shall pay my respects to you. I am, Sir, your most obedient humble Servant, * Saturday. ' Da. Hume.' 'Sir, • You seem uneasy that all my letters have been openM, and so am I too ; but, as I think I have in all of them us'd the precaution to name no-body, and to date from no place, and even not to subscribe the letters, it can be of no consequence, and can only proceed from the uni- versal practice of opening all letters at present ; though none of mine ever came to me in that manner. A clerk in the post-office opens a letter, runs it over, and, finding it concerns only private business, forwards it presently, and thinks no farther of the matter : so that, what one writes of that kind, seems to me as safe as what one says. However, as you appear to think otherwise, I shall be more cautious for the future. The unexpected vexations I met with (which I hope will now soon have an end, some way or other), made me glad, on every occurrence, to open my mind to you, and ni}' great leizure gave me full opportunity. This is my 49 reason, or at least my excuse, for troubling you so fre- quently, ' Your friend still keeps his health and temper to ad- miration. I am, Sir, with great regard, your most obedient humble Servant, ' Wednesday, ' Da. Hume.' The next letter, written by Mr Hume, is addressed to LordElibank:*— ' My Lord, ' I have copy'd out half a dozen of Epigrams, which I hope will give you entertainment. The thought in them is indeed little inferior to that in the celebrated Epi- grams of Rousseau ; tho' the versification be not so correct. What a pity ! I say this on account both of the author and myself; for I am afraid I must leave him. Vincent is re- solved on the matter, and has wrote me that my appointments are too large, and must be diminisht. This, you are sensible, is indirectly bidding me go away. The matter must be de- termined by Lady Annandale, who does nothing without Sir James Johnstone's advice ; and I wish he may not comply with the proposal from a false notion of frugality. However, I still entertain some hopes, that, if your Lordship will be so kind as to represent to him the ungenteelness, and even indignity of this w^ay of proceeding, as well as what I believe to be his own interest in the case, he may be prevailed with * Patrick, 5th Lord Elibank, the brother of Lady Johnstone of Westerhall. Of his Lordship, who was author of several pamphlets of merit, and who cultivated the society of literary men, Dr Johnson said, ' Lord Elibank has read a great deal, but he has a great deal of what is in books proved by the test of real life.' (Bos- well's Tour to the Hebrides, p. 402, ed. 1784.) See also Stewart's Life of Robertson, p. 19. F 50 to support me. We shall see an issue of this matter in a few posts. I am, my Lord, your Lordship's most obedient hum- ble Servant, ' Weldehall, March 29, 1746. ' David Hume/ This communication his Lordship enclosed in the follow- ing letter written by him, agreeably to Mr Hume's wish, to Sir James Johnstone : — ' Dear Sir, ' This I hope will find you well and happy at your own fireside. We hear but seldom from Scotland, and are in great uncertainty about what passes amongst you there. I find, however, that we must pay the land-tax in East Lothian a second time, under pain of military execution, which hardship never was imposed on any part of England. I take the liberty to send you the enclosed from David Hume, and am persuaded you'll think it for your own interest to comply with the request of it. I own it is my opinion that Vincent's only view in turning off Hume is, that he finds him an obstacle to selfish views of his own, to which even Lady Annandale may in time become a sacrifice. This I say from my personal knowledge of the man. I ever am. Dear Sir, yours, while ' April 3, 1746. ' Elibank.' The subjoined letter is the last but one, that Mr Hume wrote from Weldehall, and bears the same date as that ad- dressed to Lord Elibank : — ' Dear Sir, ' I past all the day after you left us with Mr Vin- cent, and he never mention'd a word of the proposal he made you : I saw him twice since, and he was equally silent. I 51 was in hopes that the cold manner in which you receivM it, had discouraged him ; but at last he has wrote mo about it, tho"' without mentioning any particular terms, but referring to a conversation we shall have next week. I am determiuM to answer him as I told you, and afterwards to write, accord- ing to the sketch I show'd you, with the alterations you pro- posed. ' Meanwhile, I own to you, that my heart rebells against this unworthy treatment ; and nothing but the prosj^ect of depending entirely on you, and being independent of him, cou'd make me submit to it. I have fifty resolutions about it. My loss, in ever hearkening to his treacherous professions, has been very great ; but, as it is now irreparable, I must make the best of a bad bargain. I am proud to say that, as I am no plotter myself, I never suspect others to be such, till it be too late ; and, having always liv^d independent, and in such a manner as that it never was any one's interest to profess false friendship to me, I am not sufficiently on my guard in this particular. ' I must beg of you, that, if you cannot prevail to have mat- ters continue on the present footing (as you most approve of, and think most reasonable), you may propose at least, that the diminution be made only for the ensuing year, on account of the oClOO remitted me before I came up. This will be less disagreeable and less disobliging; and will still leave the matter open for an ensuing year, when you may act as will then seem most suitable. If these people come hither this summer, I shall be exposed to all the same or greater inso- lencies and insults ; and nothing will be able to save me from them so much as this mark of regard and attention. I therefore repeat my request, that matters be put upon this footing if possible. You will then be better able to judge of the success of my endeavours, which are at present very promising. My way of living is more melancholy than ever 5!2 was submitted to by any human creature, who ever had any hopes or pretensions to any thing better ; and if to confine- ment, solitude, and bad company, be also added these marks of disregard, * * * I shall say nothing, but only that books, study, leisure, frugality, and independence, are a great deal better. ' Whatever terms are proposed to me, I must put you in mind of your promise, that this quarter at least, be left to me on the same terms as before, in case I shou'd refuse what are ofFerM ; for tho"* I think with you that I am entitled to this small advantage, such a clause will prevent all chicane and dispute. I am sure you are too much my friend, and too reasonable, to advise me to accept of any other terms than what I mentioned. A friend or two in London, to whom I communicated this matter, are even averse to the same, and think I aftront myself by admitting of any alteration ; so that my mind is extremely divided about the matter. You have seen what a task I must sometimes undergo, and not always without danger. If I have any pretensions to parts and learning, they are both requisite in my present situation ; the one to keep in friendship with a person of your friend's taste; the other to support this dismal solitude. M)^ only crime has been too little dissimulation, and too strong an indigna- tion at meeting with treachery and perfidiousness, where I did not expect it. But I need not insist further on this mat- ter with you, who are as sensible as myself of the reasonable- ness of what I say. ' T am fully persuaded that, if my Lady were but informed of this one circumstance, that her son rejected this proposal with disdain, it wouM be sufficient ; but I shall not mention it in my letter, because, as you observed very well, it will have more force, when urgM by a friend. ' Next to the saving me from this indignity, the greatest favour you can do me, is to bring the matter to a speedy 53 issue. I am, Dear Sir, your most obedient humble Ser- vant, ' Wcldehall, March 29, 1746. ' David Hume.' P. S. ' Your friend's illness has been much slighter than usual. ' Vincent mentions Major Johnstone, who traveled with my Lord, and had but L.150. But that gentlemen never was fixt with him ; he only kept a general inspection over him, without neglecting his other aiFairs, and might bo pleas'd to take a jaunt abroad, on condition his charges might be borne. Besides, he was never affronted in this manner ; and you are sensible that a man who is to be a friend and comrade to L. A. ought to be a gentleman, and treated as such. He thinks so himself. If my conduct has been not only ir-reproachable but laudable (bating perhaps too great openness and want of design and suspicion), I ought not to be treated as criminal. If it be not, I ought not to stay at all. Your friend cannot and will not see any company but one single person. On his conduct and discretion, must all the hopes you can have of his recovery depend. 'Tis strange so considerable sums shouM be lavisht on apothecaries and phy- sicians, who perhaps do hurt, and a moderate sum be grudg'd to one that sacrifices all his time to him. I say all this, not that I think it will escape you, but in order to vent my spleen and indignation. I confess I have changed opinions, even since I began to write this letter, and you need not be sur- priz'd if you find me of a different opinion when matters come to a decision, to what I was when I converst with you. Sure I am, that, if you cannot prevail to make me receive better treatment, my connexion with the family will be very short, and give me occasion all my life to reflect on the mis- chiefs arising from too great trust and confidence.'' 54 The next letter, addressed to the Marchioness, is so far as we know, the last that Mr Hume wrote from Welde- hall:— ' Madam, ' I hope your Ladyship will excuse this trouble from a person, who has not the honour of being per- sonally known to you. My connexion with Lord Annan- dale has emboldened me to use this freedom. ' I had the honour of a letter from my Lord Marquess last spring, inviting me to London, which I accordingly obey'd. He made me proposals of living with him ; and Mr Vincent, in concert with Sir James Johnstone, mentioned at first the yearly sallary of 300 Pound as an allowance which they thought reasonable ; because my Lord had always pay'd so much to all the other gentlemen that attended him, even when his way of living, in other particulars, was much more expensive than at present. Since that, Mr Vincent thinks this allowance too much, and proposes to reduce it from 300 to 150 Pound. My answer was, that whatever your Ladyship and my Lord shou'd think my attendance merited, that I wou'd very willingly accept of. As he still insisted on the reasonableness of his opinion, I have us'd the freedom to apply to your Ladyship, to whose sentiments every one, that has the honour of being connected with the family of Annandale, owe so entire a deference. I shall not insist on any circumstances in my own favour. Your Lady- shi])es penetration will easily be able to discover those, as well as what may be urg\l in favour of Mr Vincent's opi- nion. And your determination shall be entirely submitted to by me. I am, Madam, your Ladysliip*'s most obedient humble Servant, ' Weldohall, Aprile 3, 1746. ' David Hume.' 55 Her Ladyship's answer is as follows : — 'Sir, ' I received yours of y' 3d of Aprile only last post, and wish it were in my power to give an answer to the satis- faction of all partys ; but it's so delicate a point for me to de- termine, where my dear son is concern'd, and two such near relations and friends as Sir James Johnstone and my cousin Vincent, who, I am persuaded, has my dear son's health, happyness, and interest at heart in all shapes, and as they must be the best judges of what my dear son's affairs can ad- mitt of (in times that neither rents nor joynters can be paid), so my dear son and they are the properest persons to deter- mine ; but I am as much oblig'd for the regard you express for my sentiments as I am for your willingness to submit to it. — I am. Sir, your humble Servant, 'Aprile y* 15, 1746, ' C. Anna>.dale.' The subsequent letter was addressed to Sir James John- stone by Henry Home, afterwards Lord Kames, — and is equally honourable to the writer of it, and to the friend on whose behalf he makes the application : — - Kames, 14th April, 1746. 'Sir, ' I had a letter from my friend David Home* * Though both the family to which Mr Hume belonged, and that which Mr Henry Home represented, traced their descent from the noble house of Home, their surnames were somewhat differently spelled. So partial was Mr Home to hia own mode of orthography, that, even when formally writing on the business of his friend, he would not, as is evident from the letter quoted in the text, call him Hume, but adopted his own surname, as, in his opinion, the only correct one. The following extract from a codicil to Mr Hume's will, written with his own hand, and dated on the 7th of August, 1776, within less than three weeks of hia 56 lately, which surprised me not a little, as if there were a plot formed against him to diminish his salary. For my part, I was never hearty in his present situation ; as I did not consider the terms offered as any sufficient temptation for him to relinquish his studies, which, in all probability, w^ould redound more to his advantage some time or other. For this reason, tlio' I had a good deal of indignation at the dishonourable behaviour of the author of this motion, yet underhand I was not displeased with any occasion, not blameable on my friend's part, to disengage him. I thought instantly of writing him a letter not to stay upon any terms after such an affront ; but, reflecting upon your interest in this matter, I found such an advice would be inconsistent with the duty I owe you, and therefore stopped short till I should hear from you. Fm well apprized of the great ten- derness you have for your poor chief; and it is certainly of some consequence that he should have about him at least one person of integrity ; and it should have given me pain to be the author of an advice that might affect you, though but indirectly. At the same time, I cannot think of sacrific- ing my friend, even upon your account, to make him submit to dishonourable terms ; and, therefore, if you esteem his at- tendance of any use to the Marquis, I beg youll interpose that no more attempts of this kind be made. For I must be so free to declare that, should he himself yield to accept of lower terms, which I trust he will not be so mean spirited to do, he shall never have my consent, and I know he will death, shews that he was not less strenuous in support of the a than others were in favour of the o :— ' 1 leave to my frieml Mr John Home of Kilduff ten dozen of old claret, at his choice ; and one single bottle of that liquor called port. I also leave to him six dozen of port, provided that he attests under his hand, signed John Hume, that he has himself alone finished that bottle at two sittings. By this concession, he will at once terminate the only two ditterences that ever arose be- tween us concerning temporal matters.'—! Workt of John Home, vol. i. pp. 164. Edinb. 1S22, 3 vols. 8vo.) ' As io the port-u-inf ,' says Mr Mackenzie, 'it Is well known that Mr Home held it in abhorence." 57 not act without it. If you find you can do without him, I shall bo glad to receive him home upon fair terms ; otherwise I entreat, for your own sake, you will try to disencumber yourself of that intolerable shyness which plagues you, and act with that vigour and resolution which becomes your sta- tion, and the near relation you bear to the family. Do this to oblige me as well as yourself ; for it would be a new and disagreeable scene to be engaged in any interest against you. Show this letter to the Lady, and I know she will espouse my friend's quarrel heartily. She hates cunning and low arts. 'Tis not impossible I may see her this summer, espe- cially if the Session sit not ; and there appears no great pro- spect of its sitting this summer. Till I hear from you, I shall endeavour to keep my friend in suspense. — Yours devotedly, ' Henry Home."" The subsequent letter, containing an intimation of Mr Hume's having left Weldehall, is addressed to Sir James : — ' Dear Sir, ' You'll be surpriz'd, perhaps, that I date my letters no longer from Weldehall ; this happened from an accident, if our inconstancies and uncertainties can be caird such. ' You may remember in what humour you saw your friend a day or two before you left us. He became gay and good humour'd afterwards, but more moderately than usual. After that, he return'd to his former disposition. These revolutions, we have observed, are like the hot and cold fits of an ague ; and, like them too, in proportion as the one is gentle, the other is violent. But the misfortune is, that this prejudice continued even after he seem'd, in other 58 respects, entirely recoverM. So that, having try''d all ways to bring him to good humour, by talking with him, absenting myself for some days, &c., I have at last been obligM yes- terday to leave him. He is determined, he says, to live al- together alone ; and I fancy, indeed, it must come to that. As far as I can judge, this caprice came from nobody, and no cause, except physical ones. The wonder only is, that it was so long a-coming. ' There was a most villainous trick endeavoured to be play'd me by my old friend, who, after stating justly and fairly the sum due to me, in order to engage me to go away " more easily, immediately afterwards pretended to have changed his opinion, and endeavoured to defraud me of £15. But I got it under his hand (because I told him I wou'd not trust his word for a farthing), to stand to your award and Lady Annandalees. There is no haste in the determination, so I shall write you more fully after- wards. ' I shall always retain a grateful regard and memory of your friendship. I have found in this whole affair that some men are honest and sincere, and others not so. A very slender discovery you'll say ; but which, however, may be useful to me, by teaching me not to trust too much to pro- fessions and appearances. I am, Dear Sir, your most obe- dient humble Servant, ' London, Aprile 17, 1746. ' David Humf." ' If you favor me with any letters, please direct them un- der cover to Mr Oswald. ' The subjoined letter from Captain Vincent to Sir James Johnstone is further explanatory of the circumstances rela- tive to Mr Hume's dismissal. 59 'April lf)tli, l7i-(). ' Siu, ' There has an alteration happened of late, which, very likely, the person whom it most affects has al- ready acquainted you of. This day was a fortnight, my Lord told Mr Hume to be gone, and that in terms which I shall not repeat ; the Monday following, the same direc- tions were renewed in a very peremptory manner, attended with such expressions of resentment, that I advised Hume to go away the next day, which he did, the 8th ; and on the 15th I went out thither, and had told my Lord before, that, if he could be reconciled to have him return, I was very willing to contribute towards it, which proposal was not in the least agreed to. I then said it was but right that he should come for a day to take away his things, which was not objected to ; but found it was expected he should stay but that one night in the house, from whence he was very unwilling to depart, tho'' there must have been the addition of separate table and trouble, which I told him could not be, as my Lord continued determined he should not keep him about him. Hume has not for many months stomached de- pending in any respect upon my decision, who was original- ly the cause of his being received at all, and had very great difficulty, long since, and at different times, to get my Lord to bear him. He has mistaken the point ; for there is no- thing irritates his Lordship so much as the thought of any one shewing some tokens of authority, and looking on what he says as caprice, and of no consequence ; and I really be- lieve it is some such notion as this, which has produced so thorough an aversion. I gave Mr Hume a draught on the banker for two hundred pounds, payable in fifteen days, and my own promissory note to pay him, on the first of Septem- ber next, one hundred pounds more, on my Lord's behalf, for his attendance. He is not contented with this, but in- 60 sists that it is an agreement, he should be paid for the quar- ter in which he should go away, and seems to lay stress on an expression of mine, that £4)15 would be an immoder- ate sum of money for such service and attendance for lit- tle more than a year ; but when I said so, 1 mentionVl that sum according to his expectations, not that I thought it reasonable he should have more than o£-*-100, unless he had gone in another manner, with mutual satisfaction on all sides, and done more for so large an allowance, which I wish had been made less at first ; and if he had remained a month or six weeks of a new quarter, under the circum- stances mentioned, there might be some consideration thereon, and the additional £^^5 allowed ; but I protest I don''t think it justifiable to dispose of my Lord's money in that manner, especially as I had given Hume notice be- fore the first of this month (at which time his full year was to be up), that he was no longer to expect the same terms. He very confidently told me that he was suro of my Lady Annandale's and your agreeing he should have =£•200 per annum ;'" and I as roundly affirmed, that I was sure neither would decide so very contrary to my senti- ments, as it is certain nothing would alienate the warm in- clinations I have to serve my Lord and his family so much as to see this man supported in opposition to me, a point I am persuaded ho has laboured at for several months past ; and unless his behaviour had been otherwise with regard to me in particular, I can't allow that there ever ought to have been any thing but compliance and acquiescence of his side, when I was acting for the common good of all ; and the difficulty was, there was nobody else to do it. There need be no sort of apprehensions. I never have seen my Lord more reasonable and j)olitc, or more thoroughly satisfied. I * Namely .i'200 for the ensuing year, instead of £150 as proposed by Vincent. See pp. 54, C4. 61 have promised to go and str.y two or three days every week with him ; and as it is his desire to apply to the viohn, a proper person is thought of, who can be of some entertain- ment to him, and who can't interfere in any other respect ; so there will be only to pay him handsomely for his teach- ing and going out, and in all other respects. Books in his taste, fencing, and walking, will be very sufficient amusement till his health is more confirmed and improved, which not only I, but the physician this very week being out with me, has the strongest hopes of ; and it's now agreed to lessen the quantity of medicine, and admit of larger intervals in tak- ing them. My Lord walked out with me lately two or three miles, received and returned the compliments of the hat of those we met, and without any shyness or reserve, and bear to stand by, and hear me talk with any farmer or countryman. This is a vast change for the better, and the greatest appearance that it will continue ; and if any pro- per person is about him again whilst I am concerned, terms for their behaviour must be specified, and as they wax fat and are encouraged, they must be discreet enough and reasonable in their nature, so as not to kick. Such deportment would engage any good offices of mine, in fa- vour of a worthy man, fit for the purpose, which, I con- fess, is very hard to find, and possibly my Lord will not care to have any body put upon him by way of terms of continu- ance. To finish about Mr Hume, whom I desire to be troubled with no more, farther than that I wish wdiat has hap])encd could have been while you were here, I should bo glad some time or other, that you, or even any of his best friends, such as Mr Arch. Stewart,* could be left to judge of the whole of his behaviour. I gave him a note, signed by me, that, if Lady Annandalc and you consented to his having the £"5 extraordinary, I would also consent, * See p. 17. 62 as far as I am concerned ; but I must premise to you that my Lord is utterly averse to paying it liim, for he would force an audience of my Lord, who told him it was mer- cenary and interested ; that his quitting the professorship was a falsehood, as he never could obtain it ; and, in short, he received much harsher treatment than on the 5tli and the 7th, because he thought, that all that made for his purpose wovdd be right in my Lord, and to be ratify \1 ; but all that made against, then, by his construction, it was caprice and passion, and not to be minded.'' » * * The following letter, addressed by Mr Vincent to Lady Annandale, is of the same date, and enclosed the commu- nication, written by him to Sir James, of which we have given the above extract, and which he submitted to the consideration of her Ladyship : — ' Madam, ' I have only to recommend the above letter to your perusal, and please to seal and forward it. I have not said, I think, near so much as I might ; but pray, give it some attention. I asked Hume, how he could have the conscience to think of having i?75 more, after my Lord's generosity in giving him JBTl 00 at Edinburgh, and dS'SOO since, which does not make those impressions of gratitude on him that it ought. If Sir James and 3'oa think he ouoht to have the JO'^io, I would be glad Sir James would tell him that it must be referred to future consideration, when he comes up next winter. 1 am, on many accounts, glad he is gone. 1 declare Fve had more trouble with his pride and avarice, than in any points concerning my Lord, who continues in the best disposition with regard to your Ladyship. ' I exhort you to be of good cheer, and take care of your health, and beheve all will be for the best, which I hope you know is ever the sincere wish of, Madam, your most af- fectionate humble Servant, ' April 1.9, 1746. ' Ph. Vixcext.' ' ^Irs Vincent begs her compliments, and we hope Miss and the young gentlemen are well."" Relative to these transactions, the only letter written by Mr Hume, about the same period, is the following, ad- dressed to Sir J. Johnstone. It contains some interesting biographical notices. ' Portsmouth, June 6, 1746. ' Deau Sir, ' I have always sympathized very cordially with you, whenever I met with any of the names, wherein you was interested, in any of the public papers ; but I hope that one of the persons is now^ safe by his escape, and the other protected by her sex and innocence.* We live not now in a time, when public crimes are suppos'd to cancel all pri- vate tyes, or when the duties of relation, even tho' executed beyond the usual bounds, will render the persons criminal. I am willing, therefore, to flatter myself, that your anxiety must now be in a great measure over, and that a more happy conclusion of so calamitous an affair, cou'd not be expected, either for private individuals, or for the public. Some little time ago, we had here a conversation with re- gard to L^ and other persons in her condition, when * The baronet's daughter, Slargaret, had married the Earl of Airley's eldest son, Lord Ogilvy. Having engaged in the rebellion, he fled to the continent after the battle of Culloden ; but his lady was among the prisoners then taken, and in June 174(i, was committed to Edinburgh Castle. In the ensuing month of November, she found means to effect her escape ; and having joined her husband in France, she died there in 1757, nt the age of thirty-three. (Wood's Pi'cnine of Scoihmd, vol. i, p. 3.%) 64 General St, Clair sayM, that he heard from some of the mi- nisters, that the intentions of the menaces, or even of the in- tended prosecutions (if they went so far), were not to proceed to execution ; but only to teach our country-women (many of whom had gone beyond all bounds), that their sex was no absolute protection to them, and that they were equally ex- posed to the law with the other sex. However, I doubt not but your friend has no occasion for their clemency, whatever may be the case with the other ladies in the same situation, who had particularly valu'd themselves upon their activity and courage. ' As to the dispute I mentionM, you will easily compre- hend it, when I inform you, that I entered with your friend on the 1st of Aprile, 1745 ; that on the 29th of March, 1746, I had a letter from V., offering me .£^150 pr. ann. for the en- suing year, which I answerM on the 3d of Aprile, as we had agreed ; and that on the 16th of Aprile, I was obliged to leave your friend. Now, it was an article of our first agree- ment, that a quarter begun should be considered as altoge- ther finislit, and this article was a part of Mr Young's agree- ment, and offered to Dr Pitcairn ; and by these terms, any of us might have voluntarily left him the second day after the commencement of the quarter, even tho' he had desir'd our stay ; whereas, I oiFer^d to stay out the quarter, and nei- ther he nor V. wou'd allow me, but positively threatened me with violence. ' The only pretext for refusing the execution of these terms, is, that V. sent me a letter before the conclusion of the last quarter, offering me new terms ; and this, he says, tlissolv'd the former agreement, and leaves me a claim of £35 only, instead of £15, which I demand upon the former agreement. I desire that this affair may bo considered with a view to justice or equity. ' With regard to the former, I say, that the first agree- 6.3 iiicnt coird not be dissolv''cl, but by the persons who made it, viz., the consent of your friend, and your and V/s ap- probation, all of whom are positively mentioned in the paper he wrote me. Let him look unto the powers he received ; he is only empowerVl to pay me dC300 a-year during my attendance, not to alter the terms, nor dissolve the agree- ment. With regard to equity, I was offered to have the bargain made secure for 2 years, which wou'd have made my claim £^2o more. I us'd not the precaution to draw this into writing ; but is it reasonable, upon this account, to refuse me so much more moderate terms ? Tho' £475 may seem an exorbitant sum for little more than 14 months, yet £100 was a voluntary present for my journey, which ought not to be considered, and my offer of staying 3 months longer, is the same as if I had stay'd ; so that I really receive £475 for neal'lS months attendance, which is pretty near the sum that your friend has always pay'd in such cases. Can it be supposM, that even this sum cou'd be worth en- gaging any man to leave his course of life, and throwing himself loose of other views and pursuits ? I am sure it was not to my advantage, considering my situation at that time. Justice and equity must be here the same ; for can it be- imagiuM, that I am in a condition to make the M. of A., a present of £75 that of right belongs to me ? ' I received a sudden invitation from General St. Clair, to go with him as secretary to this expedition, a few hours be- fore I was setting out for Edinburgh, where I intended to have conversed with our friends, Mr Home and Mr Fergu- son,* in order to satisfy myself, whether I was partial in thinking my claim so undoubted as T imagine. I was therefore obliged to send the papers (viz., the first agreement, and V.'s promise to submit to your verdict, and that of L — y * James Ferjj^son of Pitfour, who was raised to the bench iu 1764. He married the Honoui'able Anne Murray, sister to Lady Johnstone. U 66 A e) to Harry Home, whom I have made, by my letter, entirely master to act on my side as he thinks proper. I was a little suspicious of the frugal turn of my L — y, as well as of the dependance which she must henceforth have upon V. ; for which reason, I desir'd him to draw up the case as strong as the reasons will admit. He will alter what- ever terms you will think improper in so delicate a situa- tion. ' I believe I told you, that I no way blam'd either V. or his emissaries, with regard to this last caprice. I never thought myself on better terms with your friend ; and had a commission to go to London, in order to deliver a certain portrait. I came to him before I set out, and askt him, S''il n'avoit rien d^autre chose a m'' ordonner . He imme- diately flew into a passion, say'd I was mocking him, as if he treated me like a servant, and gave me orders or commands, wou'd admit of no explanation, and thence- forth wouM neither eat, speak, nor converse with me. I never thought him capable of so steady a caprice ; and as he is resolv'd to live alone, and his director is resolved to have no controul, I do not see how it is possible to be otherwise. I was told by V. (what I am afraid is the case) that he (I mean your friend) is at present master of his current revenues, and that no man need account to any but himself for the disposal of them. However, as long as he remains in Britain, his friends will always have some resource. ' I doubt not but you will be glad to hear, that I have not changed my situation for the worse. The office is gen- teel : I have 10 sh. a-day, besides perquisites, which may be considerable ; and can be put to little expense, because I live with the General. The invitation I received, was s unexpected as that which your friend gave me. ' I was sorry to leave London without having an oppor- 67 tunity of seeing your son, and of testifying to him (as T shall to all the world) my sincere regard and gratitude to you. I am, Dear Sir, your most obedient humble Ser- vant, ' David Hume.' P.S. ' The first fair wind carries us away, so that I cannot propose to have the pleasure of hearing from you."' The following passage of a letter from Vincent to Sir James Johnstone, dated at Weldehall, on the 5th of July, 1746, refers to the same subject : — ' I had two letters from Portsmouth from Mr H., which I did not think necessary to answer, and should be much pleas- ed that I had never had any sort of correspondence or know- ledge of him, which I reckon one of the misfortunes of my life. He has merit and useful talents ; but to weigh the thing strictly, it is not fitting that I should put myself on the footing of having a disputable reference on account of a man, who makes a greedy demand after so much generosity shewn him, and who gave up nor lost not any thing by his attendance, but greatly gained by it in many respects ; both which points can be well proved. And if he, or his best friends, or any one alive, can say that, in honour and con- science, he is entitled to ^£'75 more than the £4!0{) he has already had, I am then more mistaken than I ever was in my whole life. I should wish for an occasion to have his be- haviour examined, and see whether it is to be justified ; and I say it is a strict truth that I would be free from passion and prejudice in setting it forth. But there's enough about him, and perhaps too much.' 68 On the subject of his claim for an additional quarter's sa- lary, Mr Hume had requested the friendly interference and influence of Mr Henry Home, whose admirable letter to Sir James Johnstone is equally candid and conclusive, ' Edinburgh, 9th June, 1746. ' SiK, ' I am sorry to find, by a letter jfrom my friend, David Homo, that he has left the Marquess of An- naudale, upon a hint, as he tells me, that there is no longer occasion for his attendance. I am concerned upon his ac- count, and partly that I doubt of the Marquess''s finding a more faithful or more affectionate servant. ' He acquaints me, that there is a dispute about a quar- ter''s sallary, which is submitted to my Lady INIarchioness of Annandale and to you, begging that I would write my thoughts to you upon this subject. I cannot decline this task, because it is the request of a friend, and for that rea- son, you'll pardon me for giving you some trouble. ' Of the agreement betwixt the Marquess of Annandale and Mr Home, one article is, that the sallary shall be due for that quarter in which Mr Home leaves his service, in the same way as if he had served out the quarter. This clause is very equitable, and was well designed. A ser- vant, who is dropt betwixt terms, is not supposed to find ready employment ; and therefore, unless the separation be by his fault, ho should not be a loser by it, but his sallary carried on for some moderate space of time, such as may be thought sufficient to get into new employment; and here a quarter is condescended on, the shortest time commonly al- lowed in such cases. ' Mr Home entered to his service, 1st Aprile, 1745, and continued with the Marquess till the ]6th Aprile, 1746. By the tenor of the agreement, he's entitled to a year and a 69 quarter's sallary ; but it is objected against him, that, on the 29th of March, 17-iG, Captain Vincent offered him but £150 for another year's attendance; and, therefore, that hia claim for the quarter in dispute is but in proposition to that oifcr, viz.. £S1 lOsh. ' Touching this circumstance, JMr Home acknowledges the offer was made him, and says, he gave his answer on the 3d Aprile, that whatever Lord and Lady Annandale de- cided, he would willingly submit to ; but that, instead of concluding the nevv^ agreement, he was dismist altogether, upon 16th Aprile. The question then is, whether he is entitled te £15 for the broken quarter, or only to £31 lOsh. The thing is a mere trifle to the Marquess of Annandale, but of some im- portance to a young gentleman* who has not a large stock ; and supposing the claim to be doubtful, I have great confi- dence in your generosity, that for a trifle you would not chuse to leave a grudge in the young gentleman's mind, of a hardship done him. ' But to deal with you after that plain manner which I know you love, I will speak out my mind to you, that, in strict justice, and in the direct words of the agreement, Mr Home is entitled to £^5. I have enclosed a copy of it, and the principal is in my hands, ready at your call. Captain Vincent's words are, " I engage that my Lord should pay you =£"300 sterling a year, so long as you continue to live with him, beginning from the 1st of Aprile, 1745, and that you should have your sallary for that quarter in which you should leave him, as if the quarter were fully expired." I subsume directly upon this clause that Mr H. continued to live with the IMarquess for one en- tire year, and sixteen days of another, and therefore is en- titled to iCSOO, and a quarter of that sum. * Mr Hume was, at this time, in the thirty-sixth year of his age. 70 ' Touching the oft'er of a smaller sallary, nothing, in my apprehension, can be built upon it, because it was a proposal only, which was not brought to a bearing. Mr Home con- tinued to live with the Marquess after the proposal was made, in the same manner as before ; and as the proposal was not ac- cepted of, there was no innovation or change upon the origi- nal covenant, which subsisted in its full strength and effect till the 16th of Aprile, 1746, when a final close was put to it by Mr Home's dismission. ' It is admitted that Mr Home has a claim for the broken quarter. If so, it must be upon the footing of the original covenant, because no other bargain was struck between the Marquess and him. It cannot be upon the footing of a pro- posal or offer, which never came the length of a covenant, and which, therefore, never had any effect. ' It will do me a singular pleasure that you will commu- nicate these things to the Marchioness of Annandale,andwhat further will better be suggested by yourself. Whatever shall be your opinion will be received with due deference and re- spect, as becomes your obedient Servant, ' Henry Home. ' Remember that, while Mr Home was with the Marquess, the professorship was lost."* The question respecting the payment of the disputed sum of £75, the quarter's salary referred to in the preceding letters, was not speedily settled. Nor did !Mr Hume ever consent to relinquish his claim ; on the contrai-y, about the end of the year 1760, upwards of fourteen years after he had 71 left Weldehall, and at a time when he had attained to great literary distinction,* and had realized a very ample com- ])etence,"|" he renewed his demand, and in truth instituted an action in the Court of Session, to recover the sum in question. The following interesting letter from Sir James John- stone, is in answer to a communication addressed to that gentleman by Mr Hume, wdiose letter has not been pre- served : — ' Weldehall, 29th December, 1760. 'Dear Sir, ' I could not make you any answer last week to yours of the 17th, as I had but just time to read your letter as the post passed here in his return from Lang- holm on the 22d. ' You'll readily believe it would give me great pleasure to be in any way serviceable to you, in establishing the facts necessary to be proven in the process between you and Lord Annandale, as it might save you further trouble and ex- pense, and give satisfaction to Lord Hopetoun, who, in every other case, has been pleased to place such confidence in my integrity, as to require no other testimony but my own ; and had the queries you now put to me, related to transac- tions that had passed 40 or 50 years ago, I believe I could have answered them with precision at once ; but I have * His philosophical writings had all been p\iblished, and he had risen to im- portance several years prior to this date. The last two volumes of his History of England appeared in 17(;i. t On finishing his engagement with General St. Clair in 1747, about a year after he had left WeUleliall, he says, in his autobiography, ' My appointments, with my frugality, had made me reach a fortune, which I called independent, though most of my friends were inclined to smile when I said so ; in short, I was now master of £1000." And so rapidly did he. by means of the strictest economy, accumulate money, that in 1769, he characterizes himself as ' very opulent; for,' says he, ' I pos- sessed a revenue of £1000 a-year. 72 found from experience, in several late instances, that, with respect to transactions that have passed within these 15 or 20 years, I require to have circumstances brought into my mind by others, in order to recollect with distinctness, the true state of these transactions ; and therefore, before an- swering your queries, I must put you to the trouble of an- swering some to me. 1. Upon what grounds you suppose that Ca])tain Vincent had powers from the M. of A. for transacting business for him in the year 1745. 2. Upon what grounds you suppose that these powers, or a copy of them, may be lodged in my hands, and of which you de- sire an attested transcript. 3. If you have a copy of the letter you say you wrote me upon leaving the Marquis in April 1746, claiming the sum now in question. 4. If you received an answer from me to that letter. If, in course, you will answer these questions, and send me copies of the letters you say you wrote to me after leaving the Marquis, and of my answer to you, it is not improbable but the same may bring distinctly into my remembrance the fact wanted to be established. The loss of one eye, and the delicate situation of the other, make all searches for papers a very great trouble to me ; but if, by your answer, you afford me any ground to suspect that I am possessed of powers, granted by the Marquis to Captain Vincent, for transacting business for him, or copies of such powers, I will immediately com- mence a search. Or, if you have no copy of the letter you say you wrote to me after leaving the Marquis, and that it is necessary such letter be produced, I will likewise com- mence a search for that ; tho', if you are possessed of my answer to you, I should imagine the production of that letter would supersede the necessity of searching for yours. ' What I can recollect at present in this matter stands thus : — That early in tlie year 1745, my Lord Annandjile being charmed with some things contained in your Essays, wrote Ronakl Crawfurd,* proposing your attending him as a com- panion, and I think the appointment to be allowed you on that account ; and that in consequence of this letter, you im mediately repaired to London, and was there before I returned to Scotland, April or May 1 745; that you was with the Marquis at Weldehall, in March 1746, when I came to visit his Lordship there on my return to Scotland ; and that I had a letter from you in summer 1746, mentioning your having left the Marquis, and making a demand for something still due }ou ; in which letter, or some subse- quent letter or writing, the point of law was stated to equity of your claim ; but what were the circumstances of your claim, or the precise sum demanded, has now entirely escaped my remembrance. ' By what you now write, it would seem as if the original bargain you made with Ronald Crawfurd has been inno- vated by a subsequent transaction with Captain Vincent, and that it is for this reason you now inquire if I am pos- ssessed of any deed empowering Captain V.-f* to transact business for the Marquis. If the Marquis ever granted powers to Captain V., and I was present at the executing the deed, I certainly would take care to have a copy of it ; but my memory does not, at this time, serve me of having been present at the executing of such deed by the Marquis, and yet I apprehend he must have had from the Marquis * An eminent Writer to the Signet in Edinburgh, the Law-agent of the Earl of Hopetoun, and receiver of the rents on the Annandale estates. He died in 1762. t That Mr Vincent had a commission from the Marquis of Annandale, in regard to his English property, is obvious from the following letter, dated 15th May, 1746, and addressed by Sir James Johnstone to one of the sub-agents on his Yorkshire estates : — ' I have yours, dated the 23d ultimo, and have only time at present to beg you would make out a copy of the instructions I left with you, and that you'll forward the same to Philip Vincent, Esq., at his house in Berkeley's Buildings, near Piccadilly, who I told you had a joint commission with me from Lord Annandale, to oversee the management of his English affairs ; and you will also send him a copy of the scheme of your accounts from Ladyday, 1743.' i 74 powers for uplifting money, as I have some dark remem- brance of being told, that he had uplifted several sums be- longing to the Marquis in Middletou and Co/s hands, and that in autumn 1746, either in his coming to Comlongan, or in his return from it, he had called at Hackness, and up- lifted a considerable sum from the receiver of the Yorkshire estate ; and 1 further remember, and have heard after his death, that there were accounts for considerable sums that stood open between him and the Marquis, but in whose side the balance lay, 1 do not recollect ; but no doubt, these accounts have been since settled in chancery by Mr Mon- tague, the master, to whom the court referred all things re- lating to Lord Annandale's affairs ; and if Capt. V. had general powers from the Marquis for acting in his English affairs, that may yet be learned, by making the proper in- quiries at London. At present, my own opinion is, that any little offices he did about the Marquis from the time Mr Grano left him, were rather the result of his friendship for him, and in consequence of general recommendation given him by his cousin, Lady Annandale, than in virtue of any general powers given to him by the Marquis himself. This is all that I can recollect at present in this matter ; but you may be assured, that, hovrever frightful all searches amongst musty papers are now to me, yet I will with plea- sure immediately enter upon one, if you are of opinion, by my so doing, I can contribute towards establishing the truth of the facts alledged on your part ; a piece of justice which every man is entitled to demand of me, and though it were otherwise, you have a right to challenge, from your old friend, and. Dear Sir, your most obedient and obliged hum- ble Servant, ' James Johnstonk."' To this letter Mr Hume returned the subsequent reply : — 75 ' DliAR SlK, ' I was very sensibly touched with your letter, both on account of the friendly disposition which aj> pears in it; and of the infirm state of your health, particu- larly with regard to your eyes, which, I remember, were al- ways weak, yet so as that you could amuse yourself with reading and other occupations. 1 am very desirous to spare you such a disagreeable task, as looking for old papers ; and therefore shall briefly recapitulate to you all my transac- tions with the Marquess of Annandale, which are as fresh in my memory, as if they past yesterday. ' In January 1745, I received a letter from the Marquess, inviting me to come to London in order to live with him ; and was told, at the same time, by Ronald Crawfurd, that my Lord proposed to grant me the same terms, which had been given to Mr Peter Young, viz., three hundred a year. I immediately went to London, where my Lord told me the same thing ; and it was confirmed to me by you and Mr Vincent. I took lodgings near him, and saw him every day, till we went out together to Weldehall, on the first of Ap- rile. While we stay'd at London, sometime either in the month of February or March (but I think in the latter), my Lord gave Captain Vincent powers to act for him. The powers were drawn in concert with you ; and you, as well as I, was present at the reading and signing of them. The article which regards myself, I remember perfectly. After giving him powders to hire and discharge servants, and order his family, he proceeded in these or terms to the same pur- pose (and I also empower the said Philip Vincent to fulfill my agreement with David Hume, and pay him 300 pounds a year). You explained to me afterwards the meaning of these terms in a very obliging manner ; that my Lady An- nandale, and you, and all the friends of the family, as well as Captain Vincent, had a confidence in my integrity ; that 76 tho' Mr Vincent, in the first scrawl of these powers, had drawn them in such terms as to give him authority over me, as well as over the rest of the people about the Marquess, yet you had prevailed with him to alter them ; and that, therefore, I was to look upon myself as entrusted by the fa- mily, and answerable to them, as well as to Mr Vincent, for my conduct. ' When I was in the country that summer, it occurM to Mr Vincent, as well as to me, that I had nothing under any body'^s hand, expressing the terms of our agreement. He accordingly wrote me a letter to that purpose, engrossing a copy of the terms with Mr Young, and adding, that, by virtue of his powers, and with the Marquess's consent and yours, he granted me the same terms. One article of Mr Young"'s agreement was, that, if he left the Marquess any time after the commencement of a quarter, he shou'd be pay'd the whole quarterly appointments in the same manner as if the quarter was finished. This condition was repeated and granted to me ; and it seems a reasonable condition, that I either shou'd have some warning beforehand, or an equiva- lent for it. ' I entered with the Marquess on the first of Aprile 1745, and left him on the 16th of Aprile 1746, from a sudden caprice, which left it not in my power to stay any longer. Mr Vincent, who told me several times, that that quarter was due to me, and that he wou'd pay it me, at last, on parting, took a scruple, that he might be answerable for the money, if he pay'd it where no service was per- formed ; but he promised me, if my Lady Annandale and y^ou agreed to it, and thought it reasonable, he wou'd pay it afterwards. I immediately wrote to you ; and desir'd you l)oth to consider the matter yourself, and lay it before my Lady Mai'chioness. My Lady and you thought it the best course to lay the matter before Mr James Graham, my 77 Lord's lawyer ; because, as you told me afterwards, tho' you thought my claim just, yet the sanction of his opinion wou'd best secure you and every body from blame. His opinion, as you told me, was also favourable to my claim ; but, before ho had time to reduce it to writing, he dy\l suddenly. ' I went abroad soon after with General St Clair ; and for that reason receiv\l no answer from you to my letter, at least I remember none, and have not any at present. I staid abroad some years. On my return home, I open'd a law- suit, by Lord Kaims's directions, against the estate of An- nandale. I was stopt by Lord Hopton's desire, who said, that, as soon as he took on him the management of that estate, he wou'd do me justice. The affair lay over till that time, when I repeated my claim ; and my Lord seems en- tirely inclined to satisfy me. He only desires the sentence of a Lord Ordinary to secure him against any after-claims from the executory ; and in order to that, I must produce some kind of proof of facts, which my Lord, and his agent Mr Crawfurd, both know to be true, but which cannot regularly be taken upon my bare assertion. Of this nature is the fact, that Captain Vincent had some powers, or at least that he took upon him to do business for the Marquess : which is the reason that I apply 'd to you. ' Now, there is nothing. Dear Sir, to which I have a greater reluctance than to give you trouble. But, if your papers be arranged in order, according to their dates, the Marquess's powers were granted either in February or March 1745 ; or, at farthest, on some of the first days of Aprile ; and my let- ter to you (which likewise wou'd be material), was certainly dated in the end of Aprile 1746. But if it be difficult for you to find these papers, your recollection of some of the material facts here recapitulated, might ])robably serve the same purpose ; as my Lord's lawyers will not be anxious to chicane my proofs, which cannot be expected to be very re- 78 gular, after so long an interval. I am particularly desirous you wou'd recollect this fact (which seems now to have es- capM you), that Captain Vincent did business for the Mar- quess ; because, in that case, his letter, expressing the terms of the agreement, will have authority ; and I have that let- ter by me. If you find my letter to you, please to write on the bottom of it, that it is the same letter which I wrote you at that time. ' I was extremely sensible of your obliging behaviour to me thro*" the whole course of these transactions, and retain a very grateful acknowledgement of it. It is but a bad return to give you so much trouble. But you see the necessity of the case. I still am desirous of saving you the trouble of searching into a heap of papers, which are, perhaps, in con- fusion, as you never expected that it would become requisite to produce any of them ; and, therefore, shall be contented with your ascertaining from your memory as many of the facts as you can recollect, after I have thus run them over to you. Only, as it is uncertain, whether the Lord Ordi- nary may not think the producing these powers requisite, I know it wou''d give you uneasiness, if a neglect of this kind shou'd happen to lose me the money, which otherwise he wou\l think due to me. 1 beg my compliments to Lady Johnstone, and remain, with great sincerity, Dear Sir, your most obedient humble Servant, ' David Hume.'' ' Edinburgh, Jack's Land, ' 1st Jan., 1761. ' P. S. * I beg of you to receive my compliments of the season/ 79 Relative to Mr Hume's connexion with the Marquis of Anuaiulalc, the last letter that has heen preserved, is the following, which is addressed to Sir James : — ■ *Dkaii Sir, ' I met with Ronald Crawfurd yesterday, who told me, that he had seen Lord Hopton's referee, who told him, that the sole difficulty in my affair was with regard to Captain Vincent's ])owers, and that, if these, or a copy of them cou\l be produced, there was no question with regard to my claim. This is the reason why I again give you this trouble ; and as I am certain there were such powers, and that you must have a copy of them, I must ap- ply to you, if possible, to send them to me, attested by you, as the real copy which you then took, I need make you no apology, as you have seen my reluctance to give you trouble, where the necessity of the case does not require it. Ronald Ci-aw-furd tells me, that he once saw these powers, l)ut he does not re;nember exactly the purport of them. I am. Dear Sir, your most obedient humble Servant, • David Hume."* ' Edinburgh, Jack's Land, 'oth Jan., 176L' Sir James's ans%ver to these letters is not known to exist ; but we are led to infer that it was corroborative of the al- leged fact of Captain Vincent having been formally invested with legal powers to transact business for the Marquis of Annandale in England. The case must have been settled extra-judicially, or by reference ; for, after a careful search in 80 the Minute Book of the Court of Session, we do not find that it was ever enrolled. Mr Hume's claim, it is obvious, was not resisted because it was considered as unjust, but because the agents for the Annandale estates did not regard themselves safe in making any payments, except in circum- stances in which the debt was established by legal evidence. FINIS. EDINHl'RGH: MUUUAY AND r.IBB. PRINTERS. 21 GEOROE STREET. LOAN DEPT. .1-. i„cf rinte Stamps 121983 65 (H24l8l0)47( (N8837sl0)476— A-d. ^'^Kg'^"- U.C.BERKELEY LIBRARIES mill!!!" !'! CD4b7E^DbH UMVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA UBRARY