#» THE * ELEMENTS LAND VALUATION,' COPIOUS INSTRUCTIONS AS TO THE QUALIFICATIONS AND DUTIES OF VALUATORS. JOHN LANKTREE, LATE LAND AGENT FOR THE MARQUESS OF LONDONDERRY'S ESTATES, IN THE COUNTIES OF ANTE mrJ WCBBY, AND DONEGAL. DUBLIN: • JAMES M^GLASHAN, 50, UPPER SACKVILLE-STllEET. WILLIAM S. ORR & CO., LONDON AND LIVERPOOL. JOHN MENZIES, EDINBURGH. 1852. ^^ z-^ DUBLIN : PRINTED BT ALEXANDER THOM, 87 AND 88, ABBEy-STREET. PREFACE. It would be difficult to overrate the importance to Ireland of having its land valuations properly executed. The island contains in all 20,808,271 statute acres, and the whole of this, with the exception of 650,000 acres, now covered with water, or occupied as towns, is in the hand of the farming population — subjected to the operations of tillage, or occupied as pasture. The population directly employed in agriculture was, by the Census of 1841, 5,406,743: add to this, the landed proprietors, and their staff of dependents ; the merchants trading in agricultural produce ; the tradesmen employed throughout the country as smiths, carpenters, &c. ; and the'^ total number of individuals then actually dependent on land for their support, was not less than six millions. If the Census of 1851 reduce this number by nearly two millions, still the land remains; and the population yet lingering upon it is very large, any individual of which may be said to be personally interested in the work of land valuation. That no treatise on Land Valuation in Ireland should liave ever been published for general circulation, seems strange, considering the great importance of the subject ; but the want of one was formerly less felt than at present, because excessive competition for land generally secured to landlords the full value of the soil. Many circumstances, however, at present combine to awaken attention to the subject : the potato blight of 1846 ; the abolition of pro- tective duties on farm produce ; the opening of our ports to unfettered commerce with corn-producing coimtries, where rents are unknown and taxes nominal ; the extra- ordinary diminution of our rural population by famine and emigration ; the consequent increase of waste farms ; and the radical changes in the proprietary, effected by the operation of the Encumbered Estates Court. Previous standards of value do not now apply, and competition no longer exists to correct the estimates of the inexperienced. Even for fiscal purposes, successive governments seem to have considered existing valuations unsatisfactory, and have laid before the House of Commons various bills to regulate the whole subject. An attempt, therefore, at present, to render some assist- ance to those who are interested in ascertaining the correct value of land, seems to be necessary, and the more par- ticularly, as the market rates for agricultural produce, within the last four years, exhibit so little fluctuation, that an average scale of prices may now safely be assumed as a basis for constructing tables of value. How far the pre- sent work may supply the desideratum, the public must judge. ^ The professional valuator, who is thoroughly conversant" with his business, will, probably, see little in this work of much service to him ; for it is a book of elements, with most of which he has been long familiar : but it is hoped he will not be displeased to see an attempt made to ex- hibit the importance of his own office, and have it intrusted only to proper hands. There is a large class of clever men who have had con- siderable experience in valuation, but have not enjoyed the advantages of much preparatory education, to whom these pages may offer some useful hints, which may prove serviceable if followed up. Landed proprietors, to whose ranks so many additions are being daily made, will, it is presumed, not be offended, at a period of such perplexity, to have one book of refer- ence which they can consult as to the value of their lands, of every description and quality, even under the altered circumstances of the times. When unreason- able demands are made upon them, and immense reduc- tions sought for, those who are desirous fairly to acquit themselves of the responsibilities of their position as land- lords, without going too far, may find some assistance here in the formation of a sound judgment, on a subject so im- portant to themselves and their tenants. The adoption of one general and approved guide to land valuation would be of national importance ; for the heart- burnings which prevail in districts where unequal and dissimilar valuations occur, would cease, and the two great classes personally interested in the subject, perceiving and approving the principles of their contract, would have no further cause for misunderstanding, and mutual confi- dence and good will between landlord and tenant — the great basis of all national happiness and prosperity — would be restored. CONTENTS. PART FIRST. ON THE MODES AND PRINCIPLES BY WHICH LAND VALUATION IN IRELAND HAS HERETOFORE BEEN REGULATED. Chaps. I. On the ancient practice as to setting land, II. On taking proposals for land by open competition, III. On private contracts, .... IV. On the results of incompetent Valuations, V. On the various principles advocated by valuators, VI. On the reservation of one-tliird of the gross produce as rent, VII. On the reservation of one-fourth of the gross produce as rent, VIII. On the Scotch mode of readjusting Valuations by the market averages, ...... IX. On the partnership principle, . . . . . X. On making the letting-value the principle of Valuation, XI. On the General Valuation of Ireland for regulating the County Cess, ...... XII. On the rates and scale of Statute Prices regulating the General Valuation of Ireland, . . . . XIII. On the Poor Law Valuation, . . . . XIV. On the true principle of Valuation, . . . . Page 3 4 4 7 9 10 14 17 20 21 26 26 28 PART SECOND. ON THE QUALIFICATIONS NECESSARY FOR COMPETENT VALUATORS, WITH REMARKS IN DETAIL ON THE NECESSITY OF A KNOWLEDGE OF AGRICULTURE, ETC. I. Who should be valuators, II. Of the qualifications of a valuator, III. Of practical and scientific agriculture, IV. Mode of computing the contents of land, V. On geology, .... VI. Of chemistry, .... 30 31 33 37 42 44 PART THIRD. OF SOILS AND SUBSOILS. I. The classification of soils, II. Varieties in the classes of soils, III. Siliceous soils, . IV. Calcareous soils, V. Peaty soils, VI. Subsoils, VII. Local circumstances affecting the value of land, 46 47 47 49 50 60 53 Vlll CONTENTS. PART FOURTH, ON THE CLASSIFICATION OF SOILS IN REFERENCE TO THEIR VALUE. Chaps. Page I. On the primary divisions of land for valuation purposes, . 55 II. On arable land, . . . . .66 III. On grass land, . . . .59 IV. On timber lands, . . . .62 V. On bog land, . . . . . • . .63 VI. Data assumed in forming a scale of prices, . . .64 VII. Valuation scale for arable land per statute acre, . , 65 VIII. Valuation scale for grass land, . . . .65 IX. Valuation scale for bog, . . . . .66 X. Valuation scale for arable land per Cunningham acre, . 67 XI. Valuation scale for grass laud per Cunningham acre, . 67 XII. Valuation scale for arable land per Irish acre, . . 68 XIII. A' aluation scale for grass land per Irish acre, . . 69 PART FIFTH. ON THE PRACTICE OF LAND VALUATION. I. The preparation of Valuation books, .... II. The form of Valuation book given in the Digest of Evidence of the Devon Land Commission, .... III. Field duties, ....... IV. External indications of the quality of land, . V. Checking the Valuation, ..... 70 PART SIXTH. VALUATION TABLES, VIZ. : I. For converting Irish measure into statute, . II. For converting Cunningham measure into statute, . III. Eor converting statute measure into Irish, IV. For converting statute measure into Cunningham. . V. Showing the relative proportions of an Irish and statute acre, VI. Showing the relative proportions of an Irish and Cunning- ham acre, ....... VII. Showing the relative acreable value of Irish and statute measure, ....... VIII. Showing the relative acreable value of statute and Irish measure, . . . . . . . IX. Showing the relative acreable value of statute and Cunning- ham measure, ...... X. Showing the relative acreable value of Cunningham and Irish measure, ...... XI. Showing the value of an acre at a given rate per perch, ■^1/ i^i^ y^JC 86 THE ELEMENTS LAND YALUATION, PART FIRST. ON THE MODES AND PRINCIPLES BY WHICH LAND VALUATION IN IRELAND HAS HERETOFORE BEEN REGULATED. I. — ON THE ANCIENT PRACTICE AS TO SETTING LAND. In the feudal ages of Irish history land was held under a sort of military tenure. The chiefs of the native septs held their office, not by hereditary descent, but by election, and had, therefore, only a life interest in the emoluments derived from their dominions. Their vassals cultivated such portions of the territory on which they resided as they considered necessary and best suited to the description of crop they desired to grow. A new division of the soil of each territory was made among the vassals on the accession of each new chief adapted to the altered circumstances of the tribe, and sanctioned by the voice of the people. The power of the chief was necessary to preserve his vassals from the depredations of hostile neighbours or marauders; and, in return for the protection so afforded them, the vassals were subject to various dues and imposi- tions, paid in kind, which were light or oppressive accord- ing as the times were peaceful or disturbed. B This armngement was not conducive to the generaT pros^^erity of the people. It did not afford facilities for the acquisition of individual property, nor security for its per- manent enjoyment. About the commencement of the seventeenth century, the crown of England having obtained possession of large ter- ritories in various parts of Ireland, reconveyed it in small estates, and with a title in fee to undertakers, pledged to improvement, and with stipulations favourable to the farm- ing population, who were relieved from the variable and uncertain impositions of military tenure, and permitted to hold land by lease at a fixed rent of moderate amount. The rents thus paid by the farmers, (who from this period were no longer vassals, but tenants, not dependent for pro- tection on the military strength of a chief, but on the power of British law,) were originally much less to the landlord than their descendants at present are obliged to pay to government in taxes. The yeomanry of the country were now enabled to acquire property. They enclosed farms, built houses, mul- tiplied cattle, and raised from the hitherto unbroken glebe large crops of enriching grain, which they were able to dispose of for money, capable of being exchanged for luxuries to which they had heretofore been strangers. The improvements which were thus made, the preva- lence of peace, and the increase of an industrious popula- tion, rendered land more valuable, and the proprietors availed themselves of every opportunity to increase the small amount of rent originally paid to themselves out of their estates. Thus, by degrees, the relation of landlord and tenant, as it now prevails in Ireland, came to be established ; and the unsatisfactory condition in which they stand to each other results from a prevalent desire, on the part of many proprietors, to retain in the dependence of the old semi-abolished military tenure those tenants who should be only bound by civil contract, and whose equitable claii should be legally recognised. J 11. — ON TAKING PROPOSALS FOR LAND BY OPEN COMPETITION. In the south and west of Ireland the usual mode of deter- mining the rent of a vacant farm was to take proposals for it, and on all estates under the Court of Chancery it is still the mode recognised by law. This practice is not without some plausible recommen- dations. Theoretically it seems alike favourable to both landlord and tenant: to the former as the best means of procuring him the highest market value for his land ; to the latter as the best preventive against being overrated. Practically, however, it has not wrought well. Exces- sive competition has induced speculative persons without sufficient capital to offer prices for land which they are unable to pay; and it is to be feared, in many instances, never intended to pay. Such persons have readily entered into possession, hoping that the difficulty of enforcing pay- ment might lead to a future reduction of the proposed rent. It has also tended to the deterioration of land : persons who have offered too much for land, being tempted to overcrop it, and eventually to throw it up to the landlord in an exhausted state, much less valuable than it was before it was offered for competition. It has sometimes failed in procuring even a fair rent. The influence of a former tenant in disturbed districts has prevented persons from proposing for land who might Otherwise have been anxious to do so, but who feared to expose themselves to agrarian outrage. It never could be justly resorted to in any district where tenants, in addition to the payment of rent, have been ac- customed at their own cost to fence, drain, and make other improvements; the value of which, whether made by them- selves, or purchased, or inherited, has been, by the recog- nised usage of the country, considered property, and a fair subject of bargain and sale. Now, to set land so circum- B 2 stanced by proposals, would be tantamount to a confiscj tion of the tenant's equitable interest in the improvemeni created by his own capital, which is called tenant-right; and any unjust interference with this, in places where i1 has been acknowledged, would be productive of mischiefjj A proper system of land valuation would not be open these objections, and would, therefore, be more likely give permanent satisfaction to all parties. III. — ON PRIVATE CONTRACTS. On some estates the practice has been, to fix the rent to be paid by private contract between the owner or agentAya of the land and the tenant. 411 On the fall of a lease or other determination of a pre- vious tenure, the tenant goes to the rent office, and makeaM ■ for himself the best terms he can. ^| | On small estates where an accurate knowledge of the circumstances of every holding is possible, and where th( agent and tenant meet on equal terms as to their know-1 ledge of the capabilities of the land, private contracts an a fair and legitimate mode of dealing. But on large properties, under present circumstances, i1 would be difficult to adopt this system with any advantage to the proprietor, as the contracting parties could scarcely be supposed to meet with equal knowledge as to the sul ject of their negotiation. But if landlords were provided with an accurate valua- tion of their whole estate, made by a competent professional person, with the data which such a document would fur- nish, before them, private contracts might safely be made{|ijj I and the valuation modified by a consideration of circura-" stances which deteriorated or enhanced the actual value of the land. IV. THE RESULTS OF INCOMPETENT VALUATIONS, Tt has been already said that a proper system of lan< valuation was not open to the objections against takii proposals, and was therefore more likely to give perma- nent satisfaction to the parties interested. But where are we to find such a system? There is not a county or barony, scarcely even a parish in Ireland, in w^hich one approved system has been adopted. On some estates a low scale has been adopted; on others the highest rate has been imposed that could possibly be extorted from a needy tenantry; and in many, a medium condition exists, where, without special encouragement or serious grievance, a neglected tenantry plod on as their fathers did before them, neither enliglitened by the dis- coveries of modern science, nor stimulated to greater activity by the potato plague, nor by the equal desolation of their hopes and prospects effected by recent legislation, in the enactment of measures calculated to depreciate agricultural produce without securing any compensating advantage. Land valuation, the most important labour to the happi- ness and existence of the masses of our population in which one could be engaged, is frequently intrusted to persons utterly unqualified to discharge its duties aright, and thus arises, as might be expected, the immense variation in the details. These diversities of opinion in valuation are not errors of judgment merely, harmless in their operation, but they aifect, with serious consequences, the whole social fabric of the country. In a district where different standards of value have been adopted on contiguous lands, tenants who are rated high in comparison with their neighbours, are discontented and dispirited. Such persons are averse to make any improve- ment, and many of them refrain even from the amount of labour and attention which are absolutely necessary for their own comfort. On the other hand, when lands have been let lower than their fair moderate value, contrary effects have been pro- duced; some being stimulated to undue exertions and an imprudent expenditure of capital ; while others have sunk into an indolent reliance on the natural powers soil to meet every exigency. The character of landlords also is affected by the mod in which valuations are performed. Some are called good merely because the standard adopted on their estates h been comparatively low; others, with equally good dispoH sitions towards their tenantry, have the character of b; landlords, because a higher scale of valuation has bee: adopted on their lands. Thus the popularity of the om class and the unpopularity of the other depend in many instances on this — that the valuations of their respective properties were made by persons of unequal qualifications and experience. Not the characters of landlords and tenants merely, but the physical aspect of the country itself, is influenced by it valuation ; for the appearance of an estate where a fair an moderate standard has been used, is very different from on in which a higher scale has been adopted. But there are other causes, independent of the foregoin considerations, to render attention to the subject indispen sable. None of the scales of valuation in former use ar now applicable to the country. Circumstances have lately caused a vast difference in th present value of land throughout Ireland, as compared wit its value some years back. Poor rates were unknown in 1835, when the Genen Valuation was begun ; they now press heavily on the land and in many unions completely paralyse all agricultur; industry. Free trade also ha:^ opened our ports to the produce lands unrented and untaxed, and the old protective duti which gave a factitious value to corn are abolished. The potato crop has ceased to be a sure reliance to the farmer, who, when he was able to grow it in untainted luxu- riance, could calculate upon it as an inexhaustible sourc of plenty. Its failure through a series of successive yea: has involved the country in incalculable misery, out oi which it is only now beginning to emerge These circumstances demonstrate the necessity of a gene- ral new valuation adjusted to the altered condition of the country — a valuation on principles known and approved, carried out by qualified persons, and creating general satisfaction by the moderation and uniformity of its rates. V. — THE VARIOUS PRINCIPLES ADVOCATED BY VALUATORS. The greatest diversity of opinion exists among the whole class of land valuators as to the principle on which land should be valued. The most enlightened and the most ignorant appear equally at fault on this subject. The Committee appointed in 1834, to inquire into the law and practice in respect to the occupation of land in Ireland, made extensive inquiries on the subject of valua- tion, and elicited copious evidence showing the absence of all uniformity, and the disagreement on the first principles of action, which valuators exhibited. A majority of the witnesses examined seemed to be of opinion, that the true principle of valuation for rent was to be found in the establishment of a certain ratio or propor- tion between the gross produce of land and the amount to be paid to the landlord. But among those who admitted the general principle that the rent should bear a fixed proportion to the pro- duce, there was great diversity of opinion as to what the proportion should be. Some maintained that one-third of the gross produce should go for rent; others, one-fourth; many, one-fifth; some, one-sixth. The great difference between these'proportions will be best observed if the reader will take the trouble to calcu- late the effect they would have on an estate of any num- ber of acres of land of medium quality, capable of yielding in gross produce to the value of (say) £5 per acre. The effect upon society of adopting the principle that one-third of the gross produce should be taken for rent on a populous estate of medium land, occupying an area of four miles square, would be, as compared with the princi- pie of taking one-fifth, to deprive at least 200 families of all means of subsistence, and to beggar the rest on whom they must depend either for voluntary or legal support. But there are other valuators who reject as absurd the idea of establishing any fixed proportion between the rent and the gross produce, and profess to be guided solely by their own judgment and experience. Some of this class may occasionally be not far from truth in their valuations, but the difficulty is, that as all of this class are not gifted with the same experience or intelligence, there must of ne- cessity be a great difference in the results of their labours; and that the deplorable effects described in the previous chapter are sure to be traced in any country where valua- tors follow the uncertain guidance of their own unassisted opinions. Some intelligent writers recommend a sliding scale of proportion between the rent and produce, which would be adjusted according to the capabilities of the soil, and would give the landlord one-third of the produce on the best lands, one-fourth on medium, and one-fifth or less on ijflH ferior soils. This scheme is plausible, and, if necessity existed for the establishment of any proportion between rent and produce, would deserve attention. jM Some educated professional valuators having ascertained the letting value of land, by a due consideration of the capabilities of the soil and the market prices of its produce, provide a mode for re-adjusting their valuation by the mar- ket averages of the district; thereby affording the landlord an increased rent if those averages exceed the prices on which the valuation was made ; and equally relieving the tenant, by reducing his rent should those averages fall below the original scale. This principle, being extensively adopted in Scotland, will deserve more ample elucidation. There is another principle which possesses claims for consideration: that the profits of husbandry should be divided between the proprietor and the farmer in the ra of the time, skill, and capital respectively employed; the landlord's share being the marketable value of his land; the tenant's share being an estimate of the capital invested in the cultivation of the land^ augmented bj an allow^- ance for the time and skill devoted by the farmer in the active employment of that capital. This may be called the partnership principle, for the sake of distinction. Finally, those who maintain that the only true principle of valuation is the letting value of land in its district, irre- spective of any other considerations. VI. ON THE RESERVATION OF ONE-THIRD OF THE GROSS PRODUCE AS RENT. Political Economists liave divided the great instruments of agricultural production into three classes: — labour, capital, and land; and in like manner they have spoken of the produce itself as divisible into three proportions — wages, profit, and rent. This, however, was never meant to countenance the theory that one-third of the gross produce of land should uniformly be taken as the standard of rent; on the con- trary, Dr. Longfield, late Professor of Political Economy in the University of Dublin, when asked by the Devon Com- mission — " Have you formed any oi^inion as to the proportion which rent ought to bear to the aggregate produce of a farm?" replied; " I consider it perfectly impossible to form an accurate opinion upon such proportion. Among all those who are called political economists, however they disputed upon other matters and were not disposed to agree with each other, they all agree upon this — that there is no fixed pro- portion between produce and rent; that it must depend upon the state of the country, and, at the same time, the state of the land. There are lands upon which one-half would not be too much, and others upon which one-fifth would be excessive. It is well known that the sum neces- sary to be laid out on a crop varies.^ *' Is it your opinion that a calculation founded upon the 10 'assumed avS^fe prices for a number of years, and the value of the productive powers of the farm, and the assumed proportion that that ought to bear to the gross produce, is a fallacious test? *' Yes. I do not think that any man who ever lived, having all the data given to him, could with any certainty determine it. He would still be unable to form a judg- ment of the aggregate value of the produce of the land. Mr. Loudon, in his book on agriculture, speaks of the way of determining the value of the land; but, however, he adds, in practice it will be impossible to do it. He leaves you just where you were, stating that it is a theory, but a theory which never could be applied in practice." The late Dr. Coventry, of Edinburgh, Professor of Agri- culture, would only allow the landlord to receive one-third, when the estimated gross produce of land per acre amounted to £10 lOs. The prices for grain were then much higher than at present, but the cost of labour about the same. The learned professor therefore constructed his table on calculations which admitted that £7 per acre, (which is the remaining two-thirds of the gross produce,) was a fair amount to allow the tenant of such land for his expenses and profit. But if this amount were now allowed to the tenant (and it would be quite as just now as then), there would be nothing for the landlord on the best lands in Scotland. VII. ON THE RESERVATION OF ONE-FOURTH OF THE GROSS PRODUCE AS RENT. The Earl of Mountcashel, a large landed proprietor, of great intelligence on all matters relative to land, detailed to the Land Commission of 1844 his views as to the just- ness of appropriating one-fourth of the gross produce of land to the landlord, and the universality of the prin- ciple. The following is his own exposition of this favourite theory: ** 1 suppose that land will produce a rotation of three 11 crops: I commence witli potatoes, and have taken wheat for the second year, and for the third year I take oats. I then divide the land into various qualities. I have taken No. 1 as being the very richest of our land, then No. 2 as being something inferior to that. I have given six exam- ples; but the Commissioners will recollect that although I have only given six, those six will not apply to every qua- lity of land — there will be intermediate qualities of land ; but, if I prove the principle to be good, it is very easy to adapt it to any quality of land which may produce some- thing more or something less. The whole principle is to ascertain, what is an acre of land in the country capable of producing for three years in succession, and then taking the average price of such produce; and that is what I have ■worked out on this plan. Then having got those three years' crops, I add them together, and it makes a total of £26 in the three years. I divide it by three in order to get the average amount, w^hich will be £8 13^. 4:d. I then divide by four in order to get the fourth part, and the fourth part will be £2 3^. 4c/., and that, I say, ought to be the rent for tlie first class land, leaving three-fourths to the tenant. I then work this in a similar way upon the next quality of land, and bring out as the rent £l 18^. 6d. For the third quahty, £l9s.; the fourth quality, £l 2s.5^d. ; the fifth quality, 136'. Id.; the sixth quality, 7^. lOd. per acre. I have stated before that there may be inter- mediate land; but, if the principle is a right one, it is a principle by which you may ascertain the value of any land, and what ought to be paid as a fair rent for it. No. 1. First year, Potatoes, 60 barrels, (8t. 8c. 3q.) at 4s., Second do., Wheat, 8 do., (37 bushels 20lbs.) 23s. Third do., Oats, 10 do., (51 bushels 22lbs.) 8s, £ s. d. . 12 , 10 ., 4 3)26 4)8 13 4 Rent per acre, . » . .234 No. 2. £ s. iirstyear, Potatoes, 60 barrels, (8t. 8c. 3q.) at 4.5., .12 Second do., Wheat, 6 do., (28 bushels) 25s., . 7 10 Third do., Oats, 9 do., (46 bushels 16lbs.) 8s., 3 12 Eent per acre. No. 3. 3)23 2 4) 7 14 1 18 6 First year, Potatoes, 50 barrels, (7t. 2q. I4lbs.)at3.s. 6d., 8 15 Second do., Wheat, 5 do., (23 bushels 20lbs.) 25s., 6 5 Third do., Oats, 6 do., (30 bushels 36lbs.) 8s., 2 8 3)17 8 4) 5 16 Rent per acre, . . . . 19 No. 4. £ s. d. First year, Potatoes, 40 barrels, (5t. 13c. 2q.)at35. 6d., 7 Second do., Wheat, 4 do., (18 bushels 40lbs.) 23*., 4 12 Third do., Oats, 5 do., (25busliels30lbs.)7*.6 ties. It is sought after by wealthy residents for building purposes, for recreation, for health, for scenery, and its exact value depends upon circumstances wholly beyond the range of those rules by which ordinary land is regu- lated. In the neighbourhood of Belfast, £lOO per acre is not uncommon for land to be occupied as sites for factories, and having within them a suitable supply ofl water for such purposes. All such cases must be left entirely to private arrangement between the contracting parties. Market towns give an extra value to lands in proportion to the size of the town and the distance from it. In the vicinity of large market towns, where there is constant market and good competition for all kinds o: agricultural produce, the value of land is at least doubl what it would be in ordinary situations. This increased value begins to diminish at the distan of half a mile. At the distance of one mile from a large market tow: the increased value of land is about half as much more it is worth in an ordinary situation. At the distance of a mile and a half, the increased valui may amount to about one-fourth of its ordinary value \ 57 But the real value of lands in the extra class cannot be reduced to any general scale, for it is affected by other circumstances, which require to be attentively considered on the spot, such as — 2. Superior Condition. — It frequently happens that lands are so situated as to command an unlimited supply of rich manure, and become so luxuriant by long occu- pation, that they are capable of extraordinary results. Whether used for the purposes of grazing or cultivation, their productiveness is very great, and might fairly justify the imposition of double the ordinary rate for lands of similar composition ; particularly as such lands are more easily laboured and require less seed than other soils. Some alluvial soils are of this description, and many tracts of rich loamy earth, on the margin of our loughs, impregnated with salts, and composed mainly of rotten sea-weed, possess qualities which raise them out of com- petition with ordinary soils. 3. Great Local Competition. — Local competition is principally operative in the vicinity of towns, where small quantities of land are sought for by the inhabitants, less for the sake of profit than for accommodation. Some lands are particularly desirable from various circumstances, such as accessibility, convenience, shelter, &c. Where local usages would not interfere, the best mode of ascer- taining the real value of all lands so situated, would be to take proposals for them. In the valuation books, extra soils may be marked thus by the valuator : — E. A. 1. Where the value is double an ordinary rate. E. A. 2. Where the value is increased from 75 to 50 per cent. E. A. 3. Where the value is increased from 40 to 25 per cent. Sect. 2. Prime Arable Soils. — In this class are in- cluded all first-rate soils, not amounting to extra, capable of growing wheat and the other cereals to perfection, such as — 58 P. A. 1. Rich alluvial soil. Deep loamy soil. Dark friable clayey soil, well drained and easily laboured. V All in the best condition for labour, free from stones and supeilfluous water; in good heart, requiring no outlay whatever, except for the crop. To be marked in fields as in margin. P. A. 2. Similar in quality to the above, but not quite in so perfect condition, P. A. 3. Evidently prime land as to its natural qualities, but deteriorated by insufficient drainage, by the presence of occasional boulder stones ^ impeding labour, by injudicious or imper- fect fences, or by local circumstances of an unfavourable character. Sect. 3. Medium Arable Soils. — This class comprehends light siliceous soils of easy culture, better adapted for green crops and oats than wheat ; also argillaceous soils, pro- ductive of wheat but difficult to labour ; as — M. A. 1. Loamy soils, not deep. Siliceous soils, with a fine proportion of de- composed organic matter. Clayey soils of medium quality. Sheltered pasturage of average good quality. Kindly soils, not deep, but productive and easily laboured. The above tolerably dry, well fenced, and free from stones. M. A.' 2. Soils similar to the above, but not so well drained, fenced, or situated, occasional rocks or large boulders impeding the labour, fences imperfect or injudicious ; clay soils, retentive ; also moory soils, reclaimed, with good subsoil. M. A. 3. Medium land, shallow, steep, exposed ; or badly drained, fenced, or cleared. Bog land with inferior subsoil. 59 Sect. 4. Inferior Arable Soils. — This class embraces land more elevated than the preceding classes, not adapted for the growth of wheat, nor producing good crops of any grain. LA. 1. Cold heavy clay soils, hard to labour and un- productive. Shallow soils, imperfectly mixed, deficient in some of the principal ingredients. Soils requiring rest in grass during half the period of a suitable rotation. I. A. 2. Poor gravelly soils, greedy of manure ; very tenacious clays, rocky, or with bad subsoil. I. A. 3. Sterile, shallow, hard to labour, scarcely worth cultivation. III. ON THE VALUATION CLASSES OF GRASS LAND. The order of grass land comprehends all lands growing permanent grass, either for cutting or pasture. Lands sown with grass seed, or allowed to clothe themselves with natural verdure, on an arable farm where alternate husbandry is practised, are not included, as they belong to, and must be valued as arable land. But wherever, either naturally or artificially, the land is found under grass in a permanent state, it must be described and classified accordingly. This description of land occupies a vast extent of the surface of Ireland, and exhibits necessarily a wide range of value, from the wild morasses of the almost inaccessible mountain heights, to the fine fattening plains of our richest limestone districts. Its varieties depend not only on the soil and subsoil, but very much on the condition of the land as to drainage, and much also on its situation and elevation. For valuation purposes, it may be subdivided into the following classes, viz. : — 1. Extra Class. — Comprehending meadows naturally or artificially irrigated, or pasture so situated as to possess rare advantages. 60 2. Prime. — Comprehending good meadow and grazing lands, capable of fattening oxen, &c. 3. Medium. — Comprehending coarse meadow and good feeding lands, &c. 4. Inferior. — Comprehending good natural pasture, heavy argillaceous soils, &c. 5. Bad. — Comprehending remote and elevated moun- tain pasture, and coarse wet bog land. Sect. 1. Extra Grass., E. G. 1. Meadows naturally or artificially irrigated, yielding two cuttings of grass, one for green feeding and the other for hay. E. G. 2. Meadows yielding one luxuriant after-math for pasture after a superior hay crop. Fattening pastures of known and peculiar fertility. E. G. 3. Either of the above, when natural qualities are greatly enhanced by very favourable circumstances as to situation. Generally the circumstances which have been previously recited as giving extra value to arable lands, are of equal force as to grass lands, and should be well considered in reference to this class. Sect. 2. Prime Grass. P. G. 1. Good meadow ; fattening lands, abundant in the most nutritious herbage, well watered and sheltered, level, and accessible by good roads, and in every respect in the very best condition. Superior for the dairy, yielding abundance of the best butter and cheese. P. G. 2. Fattening lands, not so well fenced, or watered, or situated. P. G. 3. Fattening lands imperfectly drained, fences irregular and occupying much ground, with a useless under-growth of saplings or 1 briers. i All lands in this class are capable of producing prime 61 beef and mutton, and can be depended upon by the farmer with greater certainty than arable lands, as being less affected by the vicissitudes of season. They have not generally deteriorated in value of late years, except when occupied for dairy purposes. There are no lands, however, which require in their valuation the exercise of a sounder judgment, combined with local experience and observation, than these ; as they are known frequently to possess extraordinary qualities even on a comparatively shallow soil, and to be less valuable where there was greater depth and more seeming energy in the soil. Sect. 3. Medium Grass, M. G. 1. Excellent for feeding young cattle, but not to be depended upon for producing good beef or mutton ; well fenced, watered, and sheltered, accessible by good roads ; coarse meadow. M. G. 2. Feeding lands, not so luxuriant as the former. M. G. 3. Feeding lands, badly drained, or fenced, with some waste, grass indifferent. There are many tracts of rich natural pasture which might be placed in either of these qualities of medium Sect. 4. Inferior Grass. The three foregoing classes, though more profitable in pasture, have all been cultivated at some period, and are capable, if need be, of cultivation ; but this class embraces land which is still in a state of nature, and has never been subjected to tillage — I. G. 1. Heavy clay land, badly drained, with short and scanty herbage soon eaten down ; natural pasture close, but not luxuriant ; capable of being cultivated, convenient, and sheltered. I. G. 2. Natural pasture, elevated, not so conve- nient, spouty, reclaimable, but at con- siderable expense ; stony, shrubby, wet. v/ 62 I. G. 3. Steeper, not convenient, elevated, ex- posed. Good mountain pasture — if not too elevated or exposed — dry and accessible, might rank in this class according to its quality. Sect. 5. Bad Grass. B. G. 1. Remote, high, unsheltered, rocky, with coarse innutritions herbage ; level morasses of ' bog ; covered with heath, or tufts of long coarse grass ; wet, unsheltered, rocky. B. G. 2. Rugged mountain tops ; rank wet bog, deep and quaking, remote, cold and dreary. B. G. 3. Sterile, high, almost inaccessible, or bare of verdure. IV. ON TIMBER LANDS. All land occupied in growing timber is to be estimated according to its agricultural or grazing capabihties. If the land be naturally good arable, capable, in a free state, of easy cultivation, and eligibly situated for farming purposes, it should be comprehended in the classification already given for arable land, according to its quality. If it be poor, shallow, stiff, uneven, or rocky, exposed, elevated, and altogether unfavourably situated or badly adapted for husbandry, it should be comprehended in the classification given for grass land, according to its natural capabilities for pasture, which will be generally indicated by the adjoining lands. All ground under old forest or young plantations should be charged in the valuator's return to the owner of the timber. If it belong to the proprietor of the estate, as is usual, he should be charged with the rent and taxes ; for timber may be considered a kind of crop requiring an ex- tended period to come to maturity. When in such cases, land under timber constitutes part of the measurement of a farm, it should be deducted from the tenant's rent, and entered as a separate holding in the occupation of the proprietor. 63 If the tliinnings of a young plantation, or liberty of cutting for his own use, whatever timber he might require, would be considered equivalent to the rent at which the timber land is charged, and that the farmer would be satisfied to pay for it on these conditions — this is rather a matter for arrangement between the tenant and the forester of the estate, than to be settled by a valuator. If, on the other hand, the occupying tenant have planted the timber land of his farm himself, or otherwise become entitled to it, he is of course chargeable with the full rent to which it should be subject. V. BOG TURF-BOG. Bog land, where reclaimable and made fit to bear crops, is classed as arable ; where occupied as pasture, it is to be classed among grass lands. Turf-bog is that description of peaty soil which is cut and dried into turf, and extensively used for fuel throughout the country. There is great difference in its intrinsic value. That which is dark coloured, hard and weighty when dry, is best ; on the other hand, it diminishes in value as it be- comes light in colour and texture. In places where it is scarce, three crops are sometimes cut and dried on the same spot in a season ; but ordinarily only one crop is cut and dried on the same ground in a year. Prime turf-bog, w^hen occupied only in such portion as is necessary for the wants of the occupying tenant, is as valuable to him as prime arable land ; but if he be obliged to occupy more than he requires, the residue, not being used to profit, is only worth the grass it is capable of producing, which seldom ranks higher than B. G. 1 . Turf-bog, occupied as such, may be classified, like arable land, into — ]. Extra Bog. In this class should be placed those usually small patches of good bog which occur in the centre of a district where fuel is very scarce and valuable. In such cases it 64 is parcelled out in very small portions, and set at high prices, which from its great importance are easily realized. 2. Prime Bog. P. B. — Dark coloured — hard when dry — close in the fibre — either cut with a spade or baked with the hand — ashes red and weighty. 3. Medium Bog. M. B. Lighter in colour and gravity than P. B., but withal tolerably good ; burning freely, but diffusing less heat. 4. Inferior Bog. I. B. Very light in colour, texture, and in the ashes — diffusing little heat. Turf-bog, light and spongy in its texture, with white ashes, is worth nothing ; but the same bog, as it gets deeper, by being frequently cut over, may become good, for turf-bog always improves in quality as it gets deeper. VI. DATA ASSUMED IN THE FORMATION OF THE FOLLOWING SCALE. 1. That the land to which it applies is situated in cir- cumstances of an ordinary character, neither conspicuous for its advantages nor inconvenience. 2. That the compulsory rates levied upon it for county cess, poor rates, or other charge, do not exceed in the whole 2s. 6d. in the pound on the valuation, or 12^ per cent, per annum. 3. That the prices of agricultural produce will average at nearly the following rates : — Wheat, at 7^. 6d. per cwt. of 1 1 2 lbs Oats, at 4s. lOd. „ Barley, at 5s. 6d. „ Flax, at 49^. „ Butter, at 655. 46?. „ Beef, at 35^. 6d. „ Mutton, at 41 s. „ Pork, at 325. or those given in Part First, chap, xii s. d. 7 6 4 10 5 6 49 65 4 35 6 41 32 J 65 4. That agents' fees are not to be added to the valuatior, 5. That the cost of day labour does not exceed 7s. per week without provisions. Note. — The following scales are all graduated to serve for perches as well as for acres. The potato crop, being still of doubt- ful and uncertain growth, its average prices cannot safely be included in the standard. JScale of Prices for the various classes of Arable Land, per Statute Acre, described in ChajJter II. Extra Class. E. A. 1, E. A. 2, E. A. 3. — It is impossible to affix any prices in this class on which dependence could be placed. The amount of artificial value which land acquires under certain circumstances varies with every locality, and must be ascertained on the spot. Prime Arable. P. A. 1. 2d. per perch, or £l 6 8 per acre. P. A. 2. lid. „ or 1 3 4 „ P. A. 3. l^d. „ or 1 „ Medium Arable. M. A. 1. l^d. per perch, or £0 16 8 per acre. M. A. 2. Id. „ or 13 4 M. A. 3. id. „ or 10 „ Inferior Arable. I. A. 1. ^d. per perch, or £0 8 4 per acre. I. A. 2. itZ. „ or 6 8 I. A. 3. Id. „ or 3 4 „ Scale of Prices for the various classes of Grass Land, per Statute Acre. Extra Grass. E. G. 1, E. G. 2, E. G. 3.— The scale of prices for meadow or pasture, the value of which has been increased by peculiar circumstances, must be fixed on the spot. F 66 Prime Grass. P. G. 1. 2ld. per perch, or£l 10 per acre. P. G. 2. 2d. „ or 1 6 8 „ P. G. 3. l|d „ or 1 3 4 „ Medium Grass. M. G. 1. l^d. per perch, or£l per acre. M. G. 2. lid. „ or 16 8 M. G. 3. Id. „ or 13 4 „ Inferior Grass. I. G. 1. ^d. per perch, or £0 10 per acre. I. G. 2. id. „ or 6 8 „ I. G. 3. id. „ or 3 4 „ Bad Grass. B G. 1. id. per perch, or £0 3 4 per acre. or 1 8 ,. B. G. 2. Id. B. G. 3. tV^. or 10 .1/' Valuation Scale for Bog, per Statute Acre, 1. Extra Bog. E. B. — The high value which turf-bog brings in many places, depends entirely on the scarcity of fuel in the neighbourhood. It ranges from £5 per statute acre downwards, and must be determined on the spot. 2. Prime Bog. P. B. — In ordinary circumstances, per statute acre, £1, or Hd. per perch. 3. Medium Bog. M. B. — In ordinary circumstances, per statute acre, 135. 4:d., or Id. per perch. 4. Inferior Bog. I. B. — In ordinary circumstances, per statute acre, 35. 4d., or id. per perch. In many districts of Ireland it is a customary and com- mendable practice to allot to each farm, free of rent, a portion of turf-bog sufficient for the adequate supply of f 67 each farm. The foregoing scale is not, of course, meant to apply to such cases, but to those in which it is scarce, and where prices have therefore been laid upon it. Valuation Scale for Arable Land in CanningJiam Measure. In districts where the Cunningham or Scotch measure is most used and understood, and where it is considered desirable to have the valuations made in the same, the following scale may be used, which approximates to that already given for the statute acre, in the nearest equiva- lents on the perch scale. 1. Extra Arable. E. A. 1, E. A. 2, E. A. 3.— The scale for these to be constructed when the special circumstances enhancing the ordinary value have been ascertained. 2. Prime Arable. — All land worth above l^d. per perch. P. A. 1, worth £115 per acre, or 2^d per perch. P. A. 2, „ 110 „ or 2id. „ P. A. 3, „ 15 „ or lid. 3. Medium Arable. — All land worth above Id., and not exceeding l^d. per perch. M. A. I, worth £l per acre or l^d. per perch. M. A. 2, „ 16 8 „ or lid. M. A. 3, „ 13 4 „ or 1^. 4. Inferior Arable* — All land not worth Id. per perch. I. A. 1, worth £0 10 per acre, or ^d. per perch. I. A. 2, „ 6 8,, or ^d. „ I. A. 3, „ 3 4 „ or id. „ Valuation Scale for Grass Land in Cunningham Measure, In districts where the Cunningham or Scotch measure is most used and understood, and where it is considered desirable to have the valuations made in the same, the following scale may be used, which approximates to that f2 68 already given for the statute acre, in the nearest equiva- lents on the perch scale. Extra Grass. E. G. 1, E. G. 2, E. G. 3 The scale for these to he constructed when the special circumstances enhancing the ordinary value have heen ascertained. Prime Grass. — All land worth ahove 2d. per perch. P. G. 1, worth 2ld. per perch, or £l 18 4 per acre. 2\d. 2^d, or or P. G. 2, „ P. G. 3, „ Medium Grass. M. G. 1, worth l^d. per perch, or £l M. G. 2, „ Ifr^. „ or 1 1 13 or 1 10 5 1 16 M.G. 3, „ lid. „ IiNferior Grass. I. G. 1, worth Id. per perch, or £0 13 I. G. 2, „ id. „ or 8 I. G. 3, „ §d. „ or Bad Grass. B. G. 1, worth ^%d. per perch, or £0 B. G. 2, „ ^%d. „ or B. G. 3, „ t'cC?. „ or 2 per acre. 6 „ 10 Valuation Scale for Arable Land in Irish Measure. For those who would prefer to classify and make their valuations by the Irish acre, the following scale affords a near approximation to the scale already given for the statute acre. 1. Extra Arable. E. A. 1, E. A. 2, E. A. 3.— The scale for these to be constructed when the special circumstances enhancing the ordinary value have been ascertained. 2. Prime Arable. — All lands worth above 2d. per perch, viz. : — P. A. 1, worth £2 3 4 per acre, or 3^^^. per perch, P. A. 2, „ 116 8 „ or 2^d. „ P. A. 3, „ 110 „ or 2id. 69 3. Medium Arable. — All lands worth above Id. and not above 2d. per perch, viz. : — M. A. 1, worth £l 6 8 per acre, or 2d. per perch. M. A. 2, „ 10 „ or l^d. M. A. 3, „ 15 „ or l^d. „ 4. Inferior Arable. — Lands not exceeding Id. per perch in value, viz. : — LA. 1, worth £0 13 4 per acre, or Id. per perch. L A. 2, „ 10 „ L A. 3, „ 6 8 „ or ^d. or ^d. Valuation Scale /or Grass Land in Irish Measure. For those who would prefer to classify and make their valuations by the Irish acre, the following scale affords an approximation to the scale already given for the statute acre in the nearest equivalents on the perch scale. Extra Grass. E. G. 1, E. G. 2, E. G. 3.— The scale for these to be constructed when the special circumstances enhancing the ordinary value have been ascertained. Prime Grass. P. G. 1, worth 3|6?. per perch, or £2 8 P. G. 2, „ Sid. „ or 2 3 P. G. 3, „ 2id. „ or 1 16 Medium Grass. M. G. 1, worth 2§d. per perch, or £l 11 M. G. 2, „ 2d. „ or 1 6 M. G. 3, „ If^. „ or 1 1 Inferior Grass. I. G. 1, worth l|(i. per perch, or £0 16 L G. 2, „ |cZ. „ or 10 I. G. 3, „ id. „ or 5 Bad Grass. B. G. 1, worth fc?. per perch, or £0 5 B. G. 2, „ i'ed. „ or 2 B. G. 3, „ ^d. „ or 1 B. G. 4, „ T\d. „ or 10 4 per acre. 4 „ 8 „ 8 per acre. 8 „ 8 „ 8 per acre. „ ,, per acre. 6 „ 8 ,. PART FIFTH. ON THE PRACTICE OF LAND VALUATION. I. THE PREPARATION OF VALUATION BOOKS. It is customary for the person who is desirous of having his lands valued, to hand the valuator a list of the farms and tenements upon it, and maps of the premises. From these data the valuator prepares his field hook — in the annexed form— of which he should always have a sufficient supply in stock. The names of the tenants should appear in the field book, if possihle, in the natural order as they appear on the map. This would, in most cases, invert the order of the landlord's list, but it would prove the most satisfactory reference. If no maps have been supplied, of course the order in the furnished list must be followed. Care should be taken that the series of numbers on the maps and field books exactly correspond. If the valuation be made for a proprietor with a view to regulate the rent to be paid by the tenants, the annexed form will furnish ample details. If it be made simply with a view to ascertain the fair value of an estate, for the purpose of sale of rental, the finished report may be condensed so as to exhibit simply — 1. The tenants' names. 2. The extent of their holdings. 3. The total amount of value, 4. Any necessary observations. Attentive examination of the soil and subsoil, which is made by causing the earth to be dug in various places. The points to which attention should be directed are — I. The mineral character of the soil, as whether it be siliceous, clayey, calcareous, or peaty. n o O V o 8jS Bl 1 ^1 n .2 C bi) ^" 1 ■S-s f, s eS fl 'O rrij 1 's g'^ O tJD *- C" O c 'a*-^ M HH "^ O *>• O ir^ 3 =^ o a» o 05 o ^ c^ O) >n CM CO ■>i CO 'O ^ o S ( — ■'^ » f — ^ \ -^ o o OD CO 00 - o c CO CO CO ^ O Tf "^ !IZ D ■^ -<* o 00 ^ "-^ o hi . w o CO CO CO o ^ ^ - o ^ o ^ P- r-, (N CO Ol CO ^ — ' (M PM ^ w d P pq o o c o ti » 00 < C^l O I- 2 ^„ fl 2 ^ 1 1 ■ 1 e c 'C ►5 ci 'o c8 ^ t-3 ►-5 ?H o'« g- ■— t i IN lis HI -3 55 • •saxBx ^ t," IN M 1 •paag CO -:22 , sdoaa jo uoijujo-i ^uasaj j = III ■ •saiouafut'nioo puB aoucansui n •wt'Bdaa ^ ,;-- . •sa Ijin ui '^a^iatjui uiojj aout!)si(i O C5 C5 ' •IB^UIBO uo ^saja^m to •e o CO ^COCO ' •t ?as aq; aAoqn laaj ui uo^iJAaia: C5 i i ' •jnoq«i ^ ^§3 . •:>oadsY 00 1 4 • •mis puB aouapua^uuadng s *;£2 , •JO aan;T5u 'nosqng - ' i •ft 3 C H "ivxox 00 ....!. 1 •jaquinK uub^ - - i ••3 o a ■1 2 3 1 { 1 1 S 00 •* 1 1 |« Is 1? 1- 11 c i 8 2 1 , £ S "IS ^ a 1 1 1 1 CO •to* CO eo 1 CO h 1 Ci ■s i 1 l| CO ■* 2 1 1 i «l« 3*; -"^ c £ s, ID ■-Id to s* • 1 1 S CO 2 I CO = ■2 • « § CO i 00 B^ ■ g^ 00 00 1 4 C5 CO 00 o «5 illli If ^ .2 ~ g i t^o I- is" s 00 o ml III! p; Hi t- o O 1 ^1 5 •a 1 o» 1 1! If it 1 1 eo to O 1 eo 'il § "Ceo ST to 1 to CO o 3 1 ! S ^ 1 ?i 00 1 o o i 1 lO ''2 '!»< .« 1 l^ si 05 CO to l| s »5 OS eo 00 1 1 g •it- eo to to CO h s in •Co t- 1 lill S 6» '^ eo (N 00 iiii S eo 00 -2 It 2 s ^3? -KM *^ 1 CO IN 00 4 g «0 Tjl eo IN 00 h 5 to* o CO C3 OS o O 1 o o 3 1 1 g =i« «^2 CO to 00 4 00 CO «o 1 1 t- 5' o eo III 111 to IN eo CO 00 75 The gentleman by whom the foregoing report seems to have been planned, states in reference to it — (Digest, p. 743.) '* This document supplies all details by which both parties interested can at once satisfy themselves as to the fairness of the contract they are about to enter upon, and without it they cannot have a distinct idea of how far the contract might be respectively judicious even at the time it was made, much less after years may have passed over, and considerable changes may have taken place in the state of the farm itself, as well as in the market prices of the produce. It will afford to both parties a distinct point of reference, and definite means of settling all future dif- ferences or questions as to improvement in whatever state of progress the farm may at any time be. Its advantages go still further : it affords the means of ascertaining the capabilities of any given extent of land, as to the popula- tion to which it can supply tlie means of comfortable subsistence, and what would be the minimum quantity sufficient for a family under different circumstances." However ingenious this document may be, and however useful to the agricultural teachers of Lough ash and Cloghan, as " a practical method of instructing their pupils," it is never very likely to advance beyond this point, or be used by professional valuators. It contains a valuation report on two small farms, containing in all eight acres, and it gives respecting these — 77 columns of details, embracing subjects for the agriculturist, the engineer, the architect, and the political economist. 92 headings or titles to the details. 180 calculations, some of them very complicated. 126 rows of figures. 64 statements open to argument, and some to serious objection. The practical valuator is not likely to enter upon so complicated a series of details. His object is simple — to view the land as it is, and report upon its quality and value, adding such general observations as may seem im- 76 If the proprietor think fit to send thfflgricufflurist to carry out any suggestions made, his recommendations and calculations will be most satisfactory in a separate form. III. FIELD DUTIES. The first duty of the valuator is to examine the lands to be viewed in connexion with the map of the same, so that he may be enabled to make those accurate observations on which future calculations depend. In order to this, he should understand the scale on which the map is constructed, and if a doubt at any time arise as to the corresponding position on the map with that he occupies on the ground, it may, perhaps, be ascer- tained by slipping the number of perches indicated by the scale from some obvious posHion, to that which is doubtful. If there be a marked difference in the quality of tlie soil, indicated by natural boundaries, not shown on the map, as where a rising ground or turf-bog separates arable land from a portion not capable of equal cultivation, the line of demarcation should be traced as accurately as pos- sible on the map, and the subdivisions so made should be lettered on the spot, and entered in the field book. To accomplish the subdivision, the valuator should take his stand at some point on the land which is distinctly observed upon the map, and so convenient to the line of change in the quality of the land, that it can be distinctly traced with the eye through the w^hole, or greater part of its length. From this point he must look to some object at the further end of the line, such as a tree, or house, or fence, likewise apparent on the map, and between the two he can draw such a line, either direct or otherwise, as ap- pears to him most accurate. The calculation of the areas within these lines can be made in the house from the map, and entered in column No. 5. The whole of a contiguous tract, as two or three town- lands lying in one range, and similarly circumstanced, should be viewed before the valuator attach the price to 7T any portion; for all tlie separate parts should bear a relative proportion to each other, and this will be best observed by affixing the prices at a time when all the circumstances of the property are fully known and con- sidered together. If the general position of the district be too elevated for the growth of wheat, or so mountainous as to attract an undue proportion of rain, or if it be remote from mar- ket, or inconveniently situated as to roads, it may be ne- cessary, under these circumstances, to deduct from os. to 35. 4d. in the pound from the scale of prices, regulating lands of the same quality in ordinary circumstances. It frequently happens that changes have occurred in the lands and tenancies of the occupiers since the map was made. The valuator should accurately note these, and show matters as they really are. Subtenancies or cottier holdings need not, however, be noticed. The quality marks should only be fixed to valuation areas, after an attentive examination of the soil and sub- soil, which is made by causing the earth to be dug in various places. The points to which attention should be directed are — 1. The mineral character of the soil; or, whether it be siliceous, clayey, calcareous, or peaty. 2. Its depth ; i. e., of the active soil, which, in medium lands, will average ten inches, in prime lands more, and in \ inferior is frequently less. 3. Its colour ; which, except in some calcareous and peaty soils, is generally rich in proportion as it is dark, and vice versa. 4. Its texture: whether it be loose, and without ade- quate firmness for the support of vigorous vegetable life ; or tenacious, from excessive water, or an undue proportion of argillaceous matter ; or friable, easy to labour, loamy, and rich in vegetable matter. 5. Its condition : w^hether exhausted from over crop- ping, or luxuriant from high farming. The soil, examined in this way, furnishes what may be \ ■HnHHI^ 78 called internal evidence of its value ; but there are also external marks bearing on the same subject which must not be overlooked, and to which reference is made in the succeeding chapter. IV. ON THE EXTERNAL INDICATIONS OF THE QUALITY OF LAND. Besides a correct knowledge of the nature and composi- tion of soils, as described in Part Third, a valuator should be familiar with the external indications of the value of land, which are elevation, superficies, drainage, subdivi- sions, herbage, and crops. The most of these are apparent to the intelligent observer at a glance, and impress him at once with a general conception of value, which it only requires the subsequent examination of the soil or subsoil to modify or confirm. Prime Lands require that all these external indications should be favourable. The elevation moderate, so as to suit for growing wheat. The superficies — a plain, free from any inequalities that would render horse labour impracticable or severe. The drainage, either natural or artificial, to be perfectly performed, exhibiting a dry surface, capable of labour in all seasons. The subdivisions mio fields not to be too great in num- ber, nor made in a slovenly or faulty manner. If the internal fences of a farm be huge ramparts of earth on one side, with a deep wide ditch or fosse on the other, the ground which they unnecessarily occupy should be calcu- lated, and deducted from the value of prime lands. The herbage should be plentiful, and of good quality. It is sometimes very plentiful, but coarse and bad. Thick fine grass, of a dark colour, on dry land, is always good. The crops growing on land will furnish good evidence of its capabilities, and, if these should be reaped, the stub- ble will show what they have been. The weak and needy stubble proves either exhaustion or incapability in the soil ; while coarseness and strength indicate luxuriance. d 79 Medium Lands : Elevation. — The Ordnance maps furnish the means of ascertaining the general elevation of every district, and the valuator should inform himself uj^on the subject ; but, as the effects of elevation upon the growth of crops is unequal, his purpose will be served by observing what crops are really grown at certain heights. If wheat cannot be successfully grown, no matter how excellent in other respects, land cannot rank as prime arable. Superficies. — In like manner, a soil which, if level, would be prime, if it lie on the slope of a hill, or in a mountainous district, or if a considerable portion of its arable land be steep and difficult to labour, should be classed as medium. But, if a portion only of a farm be of this character, and the remainder level, the steep part should be separated from the level by a valuation line, and rated on its merits. Drainage. — No clay or heavy lands can be considered prime, unless thorough drained. Subdivisions. — The internal fences of a farm, if too nu- merous, badly formed, misplaced, or containing timber trees, or high untrimmed hedges, form so serious an impediment to labour, that the valuator may see reason to reduce prime lands to medium on their account. The consider- ations which should influence him in considering this subject are — 1st. The rotation which should be followed, if the land were judiciously cultivated. 2nd. The adaptation of the subdivisions of the farm to such a rotation. If the quinquennial rotation were considered best adapt- ed for the farm, and that it were divided into any number not a multiple of five — nor judiciously adapted to that system of farming — the practical management of the farm is rendered more difficult, and without some change on the fences the occupier is involved in a series of unequal exertions and irregular operations, requiring great skill and forethought. This remark, however, does not equally 80 apply to grass lands, in which shelter is frequently an object, and the size and shape of the field immaterial. Herbage is not of itself a sure criterion, but must be taken in connexion with t*he other external marks. On some medium lands the natural and artificial grasses are very fine, and on others miserably bad, particularly on clay soils injudiciously laboured. Croj^s. — These, on medium lands, except in peculiar circumstances, will generally exhibit, both in quantity and quality, their inferiority to the growth of prime lands. Inferior Land. — The external marks of inferior land are so self-evident as to impress the most careless observer. Not only are its elevation, its drainage, its fences, its her- bage, its crops, generally in part or in whole unfiivourable, but the very aspect of the occupying tenants, and even of the cattle exhibits j)overty. V CHECKING THE VALUATION. Every professional valuator should provide himself with some means to test the accuracy of his work. If the work be all done by himself, he will avail himself of opportunities to ascertain the opinion of well-informed residents on such portions as they are most familiar with ; and his inquiries should be directed rather with a view to elicit facts as to the known capabilities of the land than as to any local estimate of its value. Concurring evidence of this kind, with regard to the productive powers of certain classes of soils, will fortify his individual judgment, and afford collateral proof of its correctness. If the labour of valuation be intrusted to assistants, they should be sent separately to traverse the field of each other's labours, and make their individual and unconcerted reports to the principal. Should any discrepancies occur this should be rectified by the personal examination of the principal, who, by this means, makes the valuation his own, and can with confidence give the finished work the authority of his name. 81 Thus, then, the ordinary correct land valuation re- quires — 1. The minute examinatiou of the land and its sub- divisions into valuation areas by the first valuator, with his calculation of the quantity and description of the quality of each. 2. The re-examination of such of these as may be neces- sary by the check valuator, with his separate opinion of their value. 3. The verification of the correct rate by the personal inspection of the principal, after which the calculations of total value may be made, and the report completed. PART SIXTH. or converting Irisli or Plantation Measure into Statute Measure. Irish. statute. Irish. Statute. Irish. Statute. Perches. A. R. P. dec. Acres. A. R. P. dec. A cres. A. R. P. dec. 1 1-6 8 12 3 33-4 59 96 2 11-2 2 3-2 9 14 2 12-5 60 97 30-4 3 4-9 10 16 31-7 61 98 3 9-6 4 6-5 11 17 3 10-9 62 100 1 28-8 5 81 12 19 1 30 63 102 8 6 9-7 13 21 9-2 64 103 2 26-2 7 11-3 14 22 2 28-4 65 105 1 6-3 8 12-9 15 24 1 7-6 66 106 3 25-5 9 14-6 16 25 3 26-7 67 108 2 4-7 10 16-2 17 27 2 5-9 68 110 23-9 11 17-8 18 29 25-1 69 111 3 3 12 19-4 19 30 3 4-2 70 113 1 22-2 13 21 20 32 1 23-4 71 115 1-3 14 22-7 21 34 2-6 72 116 2 20-5 15 24-3 22 35 2 21-8 73 118 39-7 16 25-9 23 37 1 1 74 119 3 18-8 17 27-5 24 38 3 20-2 75 121 1 38 18 29-2 25 40 1 39-3 76 123 17-2 19 30-8 26 42 18-5 77 124 2 36-3 20 32-4 27 43 2 37-6 78 126 1 15-5 21 34 28 46 1 16-8 79 127 3 34-7 22 35-6 29 46 3 36 80 129 2 13-9 23 37-3 30 48 2 15-2 81 131 33-1 24 38-9 31 50 34-4 82 132 3 12-2 26 1 0-6 32 51 3 13-6 83 134 1 31-4 26 1 21 33 53 1 32-8 84 136 10-6 27 1 3-7 34 55 11-9 85 137 2 29-8 28 1 6-4 35 56 2 311 86 139 1 8-9 29 1 7 36 58 1 10-2 87 140 3 28-1 30 1 8-6 37 59 3 29-4 88 142 2 7-3 31 1 10-2 38 61 2 8-6 89 144 26-4 32 1 11-9 39 63 27-8 90 145 3 5-6 33 1 13-5 40 64 3 7 91 147 1 24-8 34 1 J51 41 66 1 261 92 149 3-9 36 1 16-7 42 68 5-3 93 150 2 231 36 1 18-3 43 69 2 24-5 94 152 1 2-3 37 1 20 44 71 3-6 95 153 3 21-4 38 1 21-6 45 72 3 22-8 96 156 2 1-6 39 1 23-2 46 74 2 2 97 157 19-8 Roods. 47 76 21-2 98 158 2 38-9 1 24-8 48 77 3 0-3 99 160 1 161 2 3 9-6 49 79 1 19-5 100 161 3 37-3 3 1 34-4 50 80 3 38-7 200 323 3 34-7 Acres. 51 82 2 17-8 300 485 3 32 1 1 2 19-2 52 84 37 400 647 3 29-4 2 3 38-3 53 85 3 16-2 500 809 3 26-8 3 4 3 17-5 54 87 1 35-3 600 971 3 241 4 6 1 36-7 55 89 14-5 700 1,133 3 21-5 5 8 15-9 56 90 2 33-7 800 1,295 3 18-9 6 9 2 35 57 92 1 12-8 900 1,457 3 16-2 7 11 1 14-2 58 93 3 32 1,000 1,619 3 13-6 83 Table II. — For converting Cunningham Measure into Statute Measure. Cun. Statute. Cun. Statute. Cun. Statute. Perches A. R. p. dec Acres. A. R. P. dec. Acres. A. R. P. dec. 1 1-3 6 7 2 39-7 58 74 3 23-5 2 2-6 7 9 6-3 j 59 76 30-1 3 3-9 8 10 1 12-9 60 77 1 36-7 4 5-1 9 11 2 19-5 61 78 3 3-3 5 6-4 10 12 3 26-1 62 80 9-9 6 7-7 11 14 32-7 63 81 1 16-5 7 9-0 12 15 1 39-3 64 82 2 231 8 10-3 13 16 3 5-9 66 83 3 29-7 9 11-6 14 18 12-6 66 86 36-4 10 12-9 15 19 1 19-2 67 86 2 3 11 14-2 16 20 2 25-8 68 87 3 9-6 12 15-5 17 21 3 32-4 69 89 16-2 13 16-8 18 23 39 70 90 1 22-2 14 18-1 19 24 2 5-6 71 91 2 29-4 15 19-4 20 25 3 12-2 72 92 3 36 16 20-7 21 27 18-8 73 94 1 2-6 17 21-9 22 28 1 25-4 74 95 2 9-3 18 23-2 23 29 2 32 75 %Q 3 15-9 19 24-5 24 30 3 38-7 76 98 22-5 20 25-8 25 32 1 5-3 77 99 1 291 21 27-1 26 33 2 11-9 78 100 2 36-7 22 28-4 ^7 34 3 18-5 79 102 2-3 23 29-7 28 36 25-1 80 103 1 8-9 24 31-0 29 37 1 31-7 81 104 2 15-6 25 32-3 30 38 2 38-3 82 105 3 22-1 26 33-6 31 40 4-9 83 107 28-7 27 34-9 32 41 1 11-6 84 108 1 36-4 28 36-1 33 42 2 18-2 85 109 3 2-0 29 37-4 34 43 3 24-8 86 111 8-6 30 38-7 35 46 31-4 87 112 1 15-2 31 1 36 46 1 38 88 113 2 21-8 32 1 1-3 37 47 3 4-6 89 114 3 28-4 33 1 2-6 38 49 11-2 90 116 36 34 1 3-9 39 50 1 17-8 91 117 2 1-6 35 1 5-2 40 61 2 24-5 92 118 3 8-2 36 1 6-5 41 62 3 31 1 93 120 14-9 37 1 7-8 42 64 37-7 94 121 1 21-5 38 1 91 43 55 2 4-3 96 122 2 28-1 39 1 10-4 44 56 3 10-9 96 123 3 34-7 45 58 17-5 97 125 1 1-3 Roods. 46 59 1 241 98 126 2 7-9 1 o 1 11-6 2 23-3 3 34-9 47 60 2 30-7 99 127 3 14-5 48 61 3 37-3 100 129 21-1 3 49 63 1 4 200 258 1 2-3 50 64 2 10-6 300 387 1 23-6 51 65 3 17-2 - 400 516 2 4-6 Acres. 52 67 23-8 600 645 2 26'8 1 1 1 ()-6 53 68 1 30-4 600 774 3 6-9 2 2 2 13-2 54 69 2 37 700 903 3 28-1 3 ••? 3 19-8 65 71 3-6 800 1,033 9-2 4 5 26-4 56 72 1 10-2 900 1,162 30-4 5 6 1 33 57 73 2 16-8 1,000 1,291 1 11-6 84 Table III. — For converting Statute Measure into Irish or Plantation Measure. Stat. Irish. Stat. Irish. Stat. Irish. Perches. A. R. p. dec. Acrcg. A. R. P. dec. Acres. A. R. P. dec. 1 0-6 6 3 2 32-6 58 35 3 9 2 1-2 7 4 1 11-4 59 36 1 27-8 3 rs 8 4 3 30-2 60 37 6-5 4 2-5 9 a 2 9 61 37 2 25-3 * 5 3 10 6 27-7 62 38 1 4 . 6 37 ]l 6 3 6-5 63 38 3 22-8 7 4-3 12 7 1 25-3 64 39 2 1-6 8 4-9 13 8 4 65 40 20-4 9 5-5 14 8 2 22-8 66 40 2 39-1 10 G-1 15 9 1 1-6 67 41 1 17-9 11 (5-8 16 9 3 20-3 68 41 3 36-7 12 7-4 17 10 1 39- 1 69 42 2 15'5 13 •0 8 18 11 17-9 70 43 34-3 14 8-6 19 11 2 36-7 71 43 3 131 15 9-3 20 12 1 15-6 72 44 1 31-9 16 9-9 21 12 3 34-3 73 45 10-6 17 10-5 22 13 2 13 74 45 2 29-4 18 11-1 23 14 31-8 75 46 1 8-2 19 n-7 24 14 3 10-6 76 46 3 26-9 20 12-3 25 15 1 29-4 77 47 2 5-7 21 12-9 26 16 8-1 78 48 24-5 22 13-6 27 16 2 26-9 79 48 3 3-3 23 14-2 28 17 1 5-7 80 49 1 22 24 14-8 29 17 3 24-5 81 50 0-8 25 15-4 30 18 2 3-2 82 50 2 19-5 26 16-1 31 19 22 83 51 38-3 27 16-6 32 19 3 0-8 84 51 3 17-1 28 17-3 33 20 1 19-6 85 62 1 35-9 29 17-9 34 20 3 38-4 86 53 14-7 30 18-5 35 21 2 17-2 87 53 2 33-4 31 19-1 36 22 35-9 88 64 1 12-2 32 19-7 37 22 3 14-7 89 54 3 31 33 20-4 38 23 1 33-5 90 65 2 9-8 34 21 39 24 12-3 91 56 28-5 35 21-6 40 24 2 31 92 66 3 7-3 36 22-2 41 25 U 9-7 93 57 1 26-1 37 22-8 42 25 2 28-5 94 58 4-9 38 23-4 43 26 2 7-3 95 58 2 23-6 39 24-1 44 27 26 96 59 1 2-4 45 27 3 4-8 97 59 3 21-2 Roods. 46 28 1 23-5 98 60 2 o 24-7 1 9-4 1 34 47 29 2-3 99 61 18-8 48 29 2 211 lOO 61 2 37-5 3 49 30 39-9 200 123 1 351 60 30 3 18-7 300 1^5 32-6 51 31 1 37-5 400 246 3 30-2 Acres. 62 32 16-3 500 308 2 27-7 1 2 18-8 63 32 2 35-1 600 370 1 25-3 2 1 37-5 64 33 1 13-9 700 432 22-8 3 1 3 16-3 55 33 3 32-7 800 493 3 20-4 4 2 J 351 56 34 2 11-5 900 555 2 17-9 5 3 13-9 67 35 30-3 1,000 617 1 15-5 85 Table IV. — For converting Statute Measure into Cunningliam Measure, Stat. CunniDgham. Stat. Cunn ingham. Stat. Cunnic ghain. Perches. A. R. p. dec. Acres. A. R. p. dec. Acres. A. R. P. dec. 1 0-8 6 4 2 23-4 58 44 3 26-4 2 1-5 7 5 1 27-3 69 45 2.30-3 3 2-3 8 6 31-2 60 46 1 34-2 4 3-1 9 6 3 35-1 61 47 38-1' 5 3-9 10 7 2 39 62 48 2 6 4-6 11 8 2 2-9 63 48 3 6-9 7 5-4 12 9 1 6-8 64 49 2 9-9 8 6-2 13 10 10-7 65 £0 1 1.3-8 9 6-9 14 10 3 14-6 66 51 17-7 10 7-7 15 11 2 18-5 67 51 3 21-6 11 8-5 16 12 1 22-4 68 52 2 25-5 12 9-3 17 13 26-4 69 53 1 29-4 13 10-1 18 13 3 30-3 70 54 33-3 14 10-8 19 14 2 34-2 71 54 3 37-2 15 11-6 20 15 1 38-1 72 65 3 1-1 16 12-4 21 16 1 2 73 66 2 5 17 13-2 22 17 5-9 74 57 1 8-9 18 13-9 23 17 3 9-8 75 68 12-8 19 14-7 24 18 2 13-7 76 68 3 16-7 20 15-5 25 19 1 17-6 77 59 2 20-6 21 16-3 26 20 21-5 78 60 1 24-5 22 17-0 27 20 3 25-4 79 61 28-4 23 17-8 28 21 2 29-3 80 61 3 32-3 24 18-6 29 22 1 33-2 81 62 2 36-2 25 19-4 30 23 37-1 82 63 2 26 20-1 31 24 1 83 64 1 4 27 9 20-9 32 24 3 4-9 84 65 7-9 28 21-7 33 25 2 8-8 85 65 3 11-8 29 22-5 34 26 1 12-7 86 66 2 16-7 30 23-2 35 27 16-6 87 67 1 19-6 31 24 36 27 3 20-5 88 68 23-5 32 24-8 37 28 2 24-4 89 68 3 27-4 33 25-6 38 29 1 28-3 90 69 2 31-4 34 26-3 39 30 32-3 91 70 1 35-3 35 27-1 40 30 3 36-2 92 71 39-2 36 27-9 41 31 3 93 72 3-1 37 28-6 42 32 2 4 94 72 2 7 38 29-4 43 33 1 r-9 95 73 2 10-9 39 30-2 44 34 11-8 96 74 1 14-8 45 34 3 15-7 97 75 18-7 Roods. 46 35 2 19-6 98 75 3 22-6 31 1 21-9 2 12-9 47 36 1 23-5 99 76 2 26-6 1 2 3 48 37 27-4 100 77 1 30-4 49 .37 3 31-3 200 154 3 20-8 50 38 2 35-2 300 232 I 11-2 51 39 1 391 400 309 3 1-6 Acres. 62 40 1 3 600 387 32 1 3 3-9 53 41 6-9 600 464 2 22-4 2 1 2 7-8 54 41 3 10-8 700 542 12-8 3 2 1 11-7 65 42 2 14-7 800 619 2 3-2 4 3 15-6 66 43 1 18-6 900 696 3 33-6 ' 1 3 3 19-5 57 44 22-5 1,000 774 1 24 86 Table V. — Showing the relative Proportions of the Produce of an Irish and Statute Acre. Equivalent Equ ivalent Eqv iyalent 1 Pel Irish toper Per Irish to per Per Irish to per A ere. Statute Acre. Acre. statute Acre. A ere. Statute Acre. Cwt. qr. lb. Cwt. qr. lb. Cwt. qr. lb. Cwt. qr. lb. Cwt. qr. lb. Cwt. qr. lb. 1 2 13 15 9 1 1 28 17 1 4 2 1 2t) 16 9 3 14 29 17 3 17 3 1 3 11 17 10 1 27 30 18 2 2 4 2 1 24 18 11 12 31 19 15 b 3 19 11 2 23 32 19 2 28 6 3 2 22 20 12 1 10 33 20 1 13 7 4 1 8 21 12 3 24 34 20 3 26 8 4 3 21 22 13 2 9 35 21 2 12 9 5 2 6 23 14 25 36 22 25 10 6 19 24 14 3 7 37 22 3 10 11 6 3 4 25 15 1 20 38 23 1 23 12 7 1 17 26 16 5 39 24 8 13 8 2 27 16 2 18 40 24 2 21 14 8 2 16 Table VI. — Showing the relative Proportions of Produce on an Irish and Cunningham Acre. Equivalent Equivalent Equivalent Per Irish to per Per Irish to per Per Irish to per Acre. Cun Acre. Acre. Cun. Acre. Acre. Cun. Acre. Cwt. qr. lb. Cwt. qr. lb. Cwt. qr. lb. Cwt. qr. lb. Cwt. qr. lb. Cwt. qr. lb. 1 3 5 15 11 3 23 28 22 1 8 2 1 2 10 16 12 3 29 23 13 3 2 1 15 17 13 2 5 30 23 3 18 4 3 21 18 14 1 11 31 24 2 23 5 3 3 26 19 15 16 32 25 2 1 6 4 3 3 20 15 3 21 33 26 1 6 7 5 2 9 21 16 2 27 34 27 11 8 6 1 14 22 17 2 4 35 27 3 17 9 7 19 23 18 1 9 36 28 2 22 10 7 3 24 24 19 14 37 29 1 27 11 8 3 2 25 19 3 20 38 30 1 4 12 9 2 7 26 20 2 25 39 31 10 13 10 1 12 27 21 2 2 40 31 3 15 14 11 18 Table VII. — Showing the relative Acreable Value of Irish and Statute Measure. Per Irish Equivalent to Per Irish Eq uivalent to Peril ish Equivalent to Acre. per Statute Acre. Acre per Statute Acre. Acre. per Statute Acre. £ s. d. £ s. d. dec. £ s. d. £ s. d. dec. £ s. d. £ s. d. dec. 1 0-617 3 1 10-2 16 9 10-4 2 1-2 4 2 6-6 17 10 6-8 3 1-8 6 3 1 18 11 1-2 4 2-4 6 3 8-4 19 on 8-6 5 3 7 4 3-8 1 12 41 6 3-7 8 4 11-2 1 10 18 6-2 7 4-3 9 5 e-Q 2 1 4 8-3 8 4-9 10 6 2 2 10 1 10 10-4 9 6-5 11 6 9-4 3 1 17 0-4 10 6-1 12 7 4-8 3 10 2 3 2-5 11 6-7 13 8 0-3 4 2 9 4-6 1 7-4 14 8 7-6 4 10 2 15 6-7 2 1 2-8 15 9 3 5 3 1 8 Table VIII. — Showing the Comparative Value of the Statute and Irish Acres. Per Statute Ec uivalent to Per Statute Equivalent to Per Statute Equivalent to Acre. I per rish Acre. Acre Irish Acre. Acte. Irish Acre. £ s. d. £ s. d. dec. £ s. d. £ s. d. dec. £ s. d. £ *. d.dec. 1 1-6198 3 4 10-3 16 1 5 11 2 3-2 4 6 5-7 17 1 7 6-4 3 4-8 5 8 1-1 18 19 1-8 4 6-4 6 9 8-6 19 1 10 9-3 5 8 7 11 4 1 1 12 4-7 6 9-7 8 12 11-4 1 10 2 8 7 7 11-3 9 14 6-9 2 3 4 9-5 8 1 0-9 10 16 2-3 2 10 4 11-9 9 1 2-5 11 17 9-7 3 4 17 2-2 10 1 41 12 19 51 3 10 5 13 4-6 11 1 5-8 13 1 I 0-5 4 6 9 7 1 1 7-4 14 1 2 8 4 10 7 6 9-3 2 3 2-8 15 1 4 3-5 5 8 I 11-7 THIS BOOK IS DUE ON THE LAST DATE STAMPED BELOW AN INITIAL FINE OF 25 CENTS WILL BE ASSESSED FOR FAILURE TO RETURN THIS BOOK ON THE DATE DUE. THE PENALTY WILL INCREASE TO 50 CENTS ON THE FOURTH DAY AND TO $1.00 ON THE SEVENTH DAY OVERDUE. MAY 2 19 34 ftiM an 1936 1 iTlayfCHf ^R2S199IC0 1SMay'56VLl V'^^t^W i s^^^^"^ % ''C-' •" ■^ ■^ ^'rrc*D VT> SEP 10 '62 W ^ CD LD t^UG aQ ^^^^ LD 21-100m-7.'33 YC 26869 UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LIBRARY