MMM HMf '%■ LIBRARY University of California. Class -^ ■Mi^ LATIN HISTORICAL INSCRIPTIONS RUSHFORTH HENRY FROWDE, M.A. PUBLISHER TO THE UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD LONDON, EDINBURGH, AND NEW YORK LATIN HISTORICAL INSCRIPTIONS ILLUSTRATING THE HISTORY OF THE EARLY EMPIRE G. McN. RUSHFORTH, M.A. ST. JOHN'S COLLEGE AT THE CLARENDON PRESS 1893 /I, Oxfotb PRINTED AT THE CLARENDON PRESS EV HORACE HART, PRINTER TO THE UNIVERSITY PREFACE This collection of inscriptions, arranged on the plan of Mr. Hicks' well-known Manual of Greek Historical Inscriptions — between which work and my own I must deprecate any further comparison — is intended to serve two purposes. In the first place I hope that it may provide an elementary handbook of Epigraphy, and secondly that it may help to supply historical infor- mation about that period of Roman History in which the ordinary student in Oxford is still, even after the publication of Mr. Furneaux's edition of the Annals, most in need of assistance. It will be seen at once that the historical side has been made the most important. Epi- graphy in fact has only been introduced so far as it was necessary to make the inscriptions intelligible for historical purposes. The object which I have set before myself has been to enable the younger class of students to realise the value of inscriptions as historical evidence, a truth about which they hear so much but which they have so little opportunity of verifying. It is hardly too much to say that in presence not merely of the Corpus but even of selections Hke that of Wilmanns, the ordinary student is almost helpless. It has been my endeavour to supply that historical setting which is necessary if an inscription is to yield all the information which it contains. At the 169809 VI PREFACE. same time, so far as the material allowed, I have aimed at including all the most prominent features in the history and institutions of the Early Empire, and more particularly at the epoch of its foundation, the reign of Augustus. The greater part of the inscriptions are taken from the Corpus and reproduce the text there given with small modifications, such as the occasional omission of frag- mentary lines or letters which would only confuse the learner and add nothing to the historical information. The appearance of the inscriptions in the Corpus has also been imitated as far as possible by the use of capitals, but it must be remembered that the representations are only approximate and must not be thought of as facsimiles of the originals. The longer documents have been printed in ordinary type, the arrangement of the lines in the original being preserved in order to facilitate reference. The inscriptions are supplemented by a certain number of coins. The text is that of Cohen, and the reference to Eckhel has been added where the coin was described by him. There are a number of books such as Mr. Furneaux's Annals of Tacitus, Smith's Dictionary of Antiquities (third edition), Schiller's Geschichte der romischeti Kaiserzeit, 8ic., to which I have been constantly referring but which I have not thought it necessary to cite on every occasion. I have added a list of the less obvious authorities to which more than one reference has been made. Before I conclude I must acknowledge my obligations to those who have given their time and knowledge towards making this book more useful and more correct. Those obligations are particularly great to Professor Pelham, without whose encouragement and help this collection would never have appeared. He has taken the keenest PREFACE. vii interest in tlie work in all its stages, and when I say that everything that I have written has had the benefit of his revision it will be understood how much my book owes to him. I am also very greatly indebted to Mr. F. Haver- field of Christ Church, who besides carefully revising the text of the book has suggested many improvements in arrangement and has always been ready to place his knowledge of Roman inscriptions and antiquities at my service. I have also to thank Mr. W. Warde Fowler of Lincoln College for assistance on points connected with Roman religion ; Professor Ramsay of Aberdeen for an important piece of information about No. 95 which I have there acknowledged; and Mr. H. Stuart Jones of Trinity College for verifying from the original a doubtful reading in No. 35. Last but not least Mr. J, A. R. Munro of Lincoln College has not only gone through the labour of reading the sheets, but has made not a few suggestions which I think will add to the usefulness of this book. G. McN. RUSHFORTH. Oxford : February 2, 1893. INTRODUCTION [The following notes only treat of Epigraphy in so far as points requiring explanation occur in the Inscriptions contained in this collection. Forms which do not appear more than once are dealt with in the headings of the particular Inscriptions. The best introduction to the subject is R. Cagnat's Cours d'Epigmphie Latine, and Edition, Paris, i88g. There is also a treatise by E. Htibner — Romische Epigraphik, in Iwan Muller's Handbuch, vol. i. E.] Latin monumental inscriptions of the best period are invariably composed of ordinary capitals, and therefore present no difficulty so far as the characters are concerned. Attention however is called to the following usages. Every word in a line ought to be separated from those which precede and follow it by a stop [piinctuui) placed at the height of the middle of the letters. Abnormally stops occur at the beginning or end of a line (Nos. 11,68), and even between the syllables of a word or the parts of a numeral (No. 8. 5). Their use or omission is often arbitrary. The pimcta are sometimes replaced by ivy leaves, e. g. Nos. 12, 60. The letters in different lines of an inscription may be of different sizes, the most important words or names being larger than the rest (Nos. 8, 10, &c.), but the letters in one line are regularly of the same size. I however often rises above the line. Originally this repre- sented ei, but by the time of Augustus its use had become INTRODUCTION. arbitrary, and in some words it is conventional, e. g. Divl (Nos. 1, 3, &c.), and Imp (Nos. i, 24, &c.). In the latter case it has no analogy with the modern use of capital letters at the beginning of a word or sentence. The upper part of letters which stand upon a single vertical stroke (T, Y) is also sometimes extended above the line so as to economise space (Nos, ^6, 61, &c.). An accent [apex) is often placed over long vowels, but . its use is irregular and arbitrary. Nos. 3, 14, &c. Letters used as numerals are often distinguished by a line above them. Abbreviations are occasionally marked in the same way (Nos. 10. 5, 14. 6, 48. 8). A practice which grew more frequent as time went on was that of joining two (sometimes more) letters, Ligatures. ,, , , . , . . , , generally by makmg their vertical strokes coin- cide. Nos. 18, 67, &c. Under Augustus the long / is still occasionally represented Orthography ^^^ ^^' especially in the dative and ablative plural (Nos. 2, 29. 3). Cf. also in No. 32. 2 : ceivitathnn ; 4: ceivitatcs. The genitive and dative singular of the first declension in -ai is found as late as Augustus (No. 34. 6), and was one of the archaisms restored by Claudius. No. 86. 4, and cf. Caisar in 71. i, 73. 2. The single i is commoner than // in the dative and ablative plural of nouns in ia, ins, htni^ of the first and second declen- sion, in the genitive singular of those in ins, iiini, and in the nominative plural of those in ins. Examples of irregularity in spelling are not infrequent in provincial inscriptions, e. g. No. 99. The difficulties in reading inscriptions arise either (i) from the fact that many words are abbreviated or represented only by their initial letter ; (2) or from the fact that many inscrip- tions are mutilated and have to be restored. INTRODUCTION. xi Owing to the formal character of most inscriptions a large number of abbreviations are fixed and recur regularly. It is simplest therefore to explain them in connection with the formulae in which they are found. A list of all the abbreviations not explained in the text will be found on p. xxvii. The expansion of an abbreviation is always enclosed in round brackets. A Roman name when fully expressed in an inscription contains the following elements. It is not un- „ •^ Names. usual to find some of them omitted. (i) Praenomen. Always represented by the initial letter, except CN =■ Gnacns, SER = Se^'vuis^ SEX = Sextus, TI = Ti- berius (to distinguish it from T=TiUis). (3) Nomen. (3) The father's praenomen, abbreviated as above, in the genitive followed hy f{ilins). Occasionally further generations are given, e. g. No. 16. (4) Name of the tribe in the ablative. Nearly always represented by its first three letters. (5) Cognomen. (6) Sometimes the domicile or place of origin is added in the ablative, especially in the case of soldiers. E.g. No. 77. 2. In the names of freedmen (3) is replaced by "Cixo. praenomen (sometimes the full name) of the previous owner in the geni- tive followed by l{ibertus). A freedman of an Emperor is described as Ajt.g{nsti) l{ibertus). No. 75. For the formula in cases where the owner was a woman see No. 45. Slaves are described by a single name followed by the o'wnQvs praenojnen or full name in the genitive with or with- out siervns). Nos. 39, 40, &c. When persons have taken part in public life (including priesthoods) either in the State or in their own municipalities, the different offices which they have held are inscribed after the name in order of dignity, the most important generally coming last (e. g. xii INTRODUCTION. Nos. 23, 60, 93), but sometimes this order is reversed and the most important come first (e. g. No. 27). The titles are nearly always abbreviated : co{n)s{iil), pr{aetor), q{tiacsior)^ lcg[aUis). When an office is of the collegiate form the number is generally written with a numeral: \WYR. = dimmvir, &.C. Iteration may be expressed by a numeral following the title (e.g. No. 23. 18). Emperors' names and titles follow a regular order. With the Emperors of the first dynasty the form of Emperors. , , , , ^ , , 1 1 the name had not become fixed, but that taken by Augustus was the one finally adopted, and it is treated here as normal, the principal exceptions being noted under the various headings. The commonest abbreviations are indicated by brackets. (i) Iinp[erator), the praeno^nen Imperatoris (Suet. lul. 76). Tiberius (No. 14), Gaius (No. 54), and Claudius (No. 73), never accepted the praenoincn Ivipcratoris and consequently each of them uses his own prae7wmeu. Sometimes also Vitel- lius (No. 68). (2) Caesar. (3) Name of the father in the genitive followed hy f{ilius). When the father is a deified Emperor, divi is added. In the case of Augustus, when Caesar was the only person who had received consccratio, the form is divi fiiliiis). The remoter ascendants are sometimes added with n[epos), pron[cpos), abniepos). No. 92. (4) Ang{nstns). (5) In the case of Gaius, Claudius, and Nero, the name Gerinaniais follows. It is derived from their common ancestor the elder Drusus, who had the title conferred on him. Later Emperors insert in the same place names derived from victories [Dacicus, Pat'thicus, &c.). The use of Gcrmaniais by Vitellius is the earliest trace of this practice (p. 80). (6) Pontifex Maximus, abbreviated in various ways. INTRODUCTION. xiii (7) Trib{nnicia) Potcst{ate\ Tribiiniciae Potestatis, followed by the numeral giving the year of the tenure. N. B. — The tribunician year does not coincide with the actual year, but is reckoned from the day on which the power was conferred — in the case of Augustus, e. g., June 26 or 27 (St. R. if. 797, note 3) — or in the case of the successors of Augustus from the dies imperii (St. R. ii. 796-798). Tables of the tribunician years of all the Emperors will be found in Cagnat, p. 172 sqq. (8) Imp[erator) followed by a numeral, the acclamatio imperatoria assumed after military successes gained by the Emperor or under his auspices. The first military success was expressed by IMP II, and so on, IMP I being assumed at accession. (9) Co{ii)s{2tl) followed by a numeral to express the number of times held, and in case the Emperor has been elected for the next year, by design{aUis). With Augustus the consul- ship comes before (7). (10) P{afej') P{atriae). It will be noticed that (7) (8) (9) determine the date of the inscription. Form of Inscriptions. The inscriptions contained in this selection, which are fairly representative of monumental inscriptions generally, may be classed under the following heads. Inscriptions proper [tituli), the essence of which is the name of an individual and a statement of his relation to the monument on which it is inscribed, must be distinguished from the various kinds of public acts or documents (the most general name for which is acta) engraved upon stone or metal. xiv INTRODUCTION. I. Inscriptions Proper. Epitaphs take various forms, and the following classifica- tion cannot be regarded as fixed. Ordinarily, however, epitaphs contain two parts — {a) The name of the deceased accompanied by his official description or career, either — (i) In the nominative, followed by h[ic) siitus) e[st) or some equivalent. E.g. Nos. i8, 99. (2) Or in the genitive, depending on D{is) M{anibus), which is also sometimes prefixed independently to the other forms. No. 11. (3) Or in the dative. No. 10. {h) The name of the person who has erected the memorial, in the nominative. Nos. 10, 18, &c. N.B. — (i) Statements of age (generally expressed by ann{omvi) followed by a numeral) are not usual in the case of persons whose official career is given. With soldiers sti- piendioniui) is added. No. 67. (ii) Sometimes a formula is added protecting the tomb. No. 23. 22. (iii) No. 23, in which the deceased speaks in the first person, is abnormal. The more elaborate elogia sometimes found on tombs are illustrated by No. 93. Nos. 54 and ^^ are not to be classed as epitaphs. The epitaphs would occupy a conspicuous position on the outer face of the Augustan Mausoleum. Honorary inscriptions are generally inscribed on the pedestal of a statue erected to an individual in . ,. his lifetime. The commonest type crives the Inscriptions. . * name of the person with his titles and offices in the dative, followed by that of the community or person who has erected it in the nominative, concluding with some expression which indicates the occasion or reason of the erection. Nos. 17, '3,% 76, 100, are typical. INTRODUCTION. xv Votive inscriptions are those which are connected with an image, altar, or temple of a divinity. The regular type has the name of the divinity in the jj^g^riptions dative, sacrum being sometimes added, and that of the dedicator in the nominative. At the end there is generally some formula which expresses the act of offering : d{edit) d{edicavit), v{otiim) s{ohit\ &c. Nos. 46, 4i'>^, 98. The cippi tcrminalcs used for defining public „ , land, the course of the Tiber, the line of the stones. Pomerium, &c., are inscribed on similar principles. Their peculiar forms are explained in the instances given. Nos. 25, 26, 73. The large class of inscriptions (containing little beyond the name of the maker or producer) found upon pottery, bricks, marble in block, pigs of lead, &c., is represented in this selection only by the legionary tile No. 69. These were made in the army for use in military works, and are stamped with the name of the legion, or, in the case of a composite force, with the names of all the legions which make it up. xvi INTRODUCTION. 11. Documents. To be distinguished from inscriptions proper are documents the original and appropriate form for which is Manuscript, but which for purposes of pubHcation are engraved on marble, stone, or bronze. Those which occur here may be classed as follows. For the double character of No. 70 as a lex and a senatiis constdtwn see p. 84, and cf. the form of No. '^^. Laws. ^j^^ Imperial Edicts (Nos. 79, 82) belong to the category of leges (see Ulpian, quoted on p. 86). With them may be classed the grants of citizenship to soldiers on their discharge {diplomata militaria, privilegia veter- Dip omata ^;^^^^^;; A of which No. 78 is an example. They Mihtaria. ' . . take the form of bronze diptychs professmg to contain certified copies of the original grants preserved at Rome (No. 78. 19). The original contained the names of all the soldiers who were discharged at the same time (cf. 1. 7 : quorum nomina subscripta sunt), but the copy only gives the name of the individual for whose benefit it was made (1. 18). Hence some examples give a reference to the place in the original document where the name occurred (e. g. C. I. L. iii. p. 846, 1. 5 :pag. II. kap. XVI, and cf. pp. 847, 848, which are two copies from the same grant). The grant is inscribed on the inner side of one of the leaves of the diptych, and the names and seals of the seven witnesses who attested the copy on the other. The grant alone is repeated on the outer sides. For descriptions of the diptychs see Mommsen in C. I. L. iii. p. 902 ; Wilmanns, Exempla, ii. p. 272 ; Cagnat, Cours dEpi- graphie, p. 264. Among the sacerdotal colleges the Arval Brotherhood is the only one the Acta of which have come down Religious to us in any appreciable quantity. No. 60. The Corpora- fragments, extending from the time of Augustus tions. ^Q ^j^g middle of the third century, contain, in addition to the account of the three-days festival of the Dea INTRODUCTION. xvii Dia (on the second of which the famous carmen was sung) and notices relating to the appointment of new members of the college, records of various religious observances connected with events in the lives of the reigning Emperor and members of his family, and thus often provide contemporary evidence as to dates. The greater part of the fragments were dis- covered in the Vigna Ceccarelli about five miles from Rome on the road to Porto, corresponding to the hints deac Diae via Campana apiid lapideni quintum mentioned in the Acta for Nov. 7, A. D. 224, C. I. L. vi. p. 575. See Henzen, Acta Fratrimi Arvalitim (Berlin, 1874). C. I. L. vi. p. 459, Eph. Epigr. ii. p. 3ii,viii. p. 316. Typical selections will be found in Wilmanns, Exeinpla, ii. pp. 280-298. The Roman Calendars (illustrated by No. 4) are arranged in the form of columns each of which contains a different set of notices about the days of the month. (1) The first column contains the littera mmdinalis or day of the week ; the year being divided into weeks of eight days [nniidinac, the eighth day) marked by the first eight letters of the alphabet. In No. 4, E. (2) The second column gives the day of the month, either one of the fixed points [Kalendae, Nonae, Idus in No. 4 represented by EID) or the number of the day before the next fixed point. (3) The third column indicates the character of the day, e. g. whether fastus (f), comitialis (c), nefastus (n) ; a dies nefastiis Jiilarior being distinguished by the archaic form of N, as in No. 4. (4) Lastly come various notices about the day, religious observances connected with it, or events commemorated on it ; and, when these occur for the first time, explanations of the name of the day {Kalendae^ &c.). In No. 4 the explanation of Idtis is too fragmentary to be restored. No. 38 is an example of a Feriale or Calendar of a particular xviii INTRODUCTION. local cult outside Rome. As only the feast-days are men- tioned, the entries are confined to the date, the event com- memorated, and the religious observance connected with it. The fragments of the various Calendars which have been discovered in Rome and Italy are collected in C.I.L. i. p. 293 sqq., vi. p. 625 sqq. The lists of magistrates arranged in chronological order, of which the Fasti Consniarcs are the most import- antj are represented here only by the extract from the Fasti Feriartim Latinarwn, No. 5- They contain only the date of the festival and the names of the Consuls of the year who officiated. See C. LL. vi. p. 455, xiv. p. 213 ; Eph. Epigr. ii. p. 93. The Ancyran Monument is only made use of in the present TheMonu- volume for purposes of illustration like the mentum literary sources, but it is quoted and referred to Ancyranum. ^^ oix^vi in Part I that it may be well to give a short account of it. The Res gestae divi Aiigusti quibus orbem terrarum imperio popidi Romani subiecit et impensae qiias in rem ptiblicam popu- Iwnque Romanum feeit — to quote the heading of the docu- ment — are inscribed on the inside walls of the Pronaos of the Temple of Augustus and Roma at Ancyra in Galatia. The heading further informs us that what follows is a copy of an original engraved in dnahis aJiencis pilis qnae stmt Roniae positae. It is clear then that Suetonius is referring to the same original when he mentions the indicem reruni a se ges- tartini quern incidi vellct {Atignstus) in aetieis tahdis quae ante Mansolemn stainerentitr (Aug. 101, cf. Dio Cass. 5^- 33)- It was apparently reproduced at Ancyra by way of doing honour to the memory of Augustus, and as was natural in the Greek- speaking part of the Empire, a Greek translation was engraved on one of the outer walls of the temple. The contents of the document are sufficiently indicated by the heading quoted above, and it is not possible to class it under any particular INTRODUCTION. xi'x kind of inscriptions. The view that it is an epitaph is forced, but Mommsen has pointed out that the nearest analogy is to be found in the inscription of the tomb of Antiochus of Com- magene on the Nimrud Dagh near the Euphrates {Historische Zeitschrift, 1887, 385. Cf. Mommser\, Provinces, ii. 125). For the principles on which mutilated or fragmentary inscriptions can be restored see Cagnat, Cours, 333. Here it will be enough to point out that in Restora- 1 • • , . , , tions. many cases the restoration is determined by — (i) The ascertained limits of the inscription. The length of the lines and the size of the letters being known, the number of letters required can be fixed. E. g. No. 86. (2) The formal character of inscriptions. If certain data are preseived the rest can be supplied with certainty. E. g. the names and titles of Emperors (e. g. No. 29). So in docu- ments which contain many legal formulae : e. g. No. '^^. Restorations are added in italics where the inscription itself is reproduced, and within square brackets where the inscrip- tion is expanded. Coins. As coins only take a subordinate place in this selection, it will not be necessary here to notice more than the following elementary facts about them. For further information see Cohen, Mcdailles Imp. i, Introduction p. xiii. Hirschfeld, VerwaltiingsgescJiichte , 92. Under the Empire the coinage of gold and silver belongs to the Emperor, that of bronze to the Senate. The gold coins are the denarius, known as the aureus ( = 25 silver denarii), and its half the quinarius. b2 XX INTRODUCTION. The silver coins are the denarius and qimtarius. The bronze coins are conventionally described as — Large bronze Middle „ Small „ The head of the Emperor appears on these just as on the Imperial coins, but the reverse is marked with S{enatus) Cipnsulto). BIBLIOGRAPHY. [A USEFUL bibliography of Latin inscriptions with an account of the pubh'cation and contents of the Corpus will be found in J. P. Waltzing's Recueil general des Inscriptmis Latines, et P l^pigraphie Latine depuis 50 ans. Louvain, 1892. (The treatment of Britain is defective.)] The following are the chief collections of Latin inscriptions. Most of them will be found cited as the authorities for the in- scriptions contained in this selection. The abbreviations by which they are referred to are either prefixed to the title or follow it within brackets. C. I. L.^=^ Corpus Inscriptionum Latinarum consi/io et auctoritaie Acade?niae Litterariim Regiae Borussicae editum (Berlin). Inscriptions discovered after the publication of the various volumes of the Corpus appear in the Ephemeris Epigraphica {Eph. Epigr.). From time to time the inscriptions belonging to a particular country which have been published in the Ephemeris or elsewhere, are collected into a Supp/ementum of the volume of the Corpus relating to that country (e. g. C. I. L. iii. StippL). The most important recent discoveries which have been published in periodicals &c. are collected in M. Cagnat's Revue des ptihlications ipigraphiqties relatives a rantiqiiite roniame, which appears as an appendix to the numbers of the Revue Anheologique, and annually in a separate form as L'Annee e'pigraphique (Paris, from 1888). (Not always reliable in case of Britain.) The following are the contents of the Corpus arranged geographi- cally. Vols, not yet published are enclosed within square brackets. b 3 xxii BIBLIOGRAPHY. ITALY. C. I. L. i. (1863), Inscriptiones Latinae antiquissimae (to death of Caesar). Contains a certain number of inscriptions outside Italy, and also the Calendars, Fasti, «S:c. A new edition will shortly be issued. Supplements have appeared in Eph. Epigr. i, ii, iii, iv. Rome. C. I. L. vi. Four parts have appeared (1876-1885). C. I. L. XV. Itistrumentutn domesticutn (marks on bricks, pottery, &c.). Part I. (1891). Supplements for Rome in Eph. Epigr. i, iii, iv, viii (contains the recently discovered Acta of the Ludi Saeculares). Inscriptions from the city of Rome are now published, as they are discovered, in the Bulletino delta Com- missione Archeologica Comunale (formerly Muni- cipale) di Roma from 1872 {Bull. Com.), and also in the Notizie degli Scavi (see below). Central Italy. C. I. L. xiv. (1887). Latium veins. Supple- ment in Eph. Epigr. viii. C. I. L. xi. Part I. (1888). Aemilia, Etruria. [Part 11. Umbria.] North Italy (Cisalpine Gaul). C. I. L. v. Part I. (1872). Eastern half {Regio X). C. I. L. v. Part II. (1877). Western half {Regio IX, XI). Additamenta ad vol. V. Galliae Cisalpinae {consilio et audoritate Academiae Reg. Lynceorum). Rome, 1884. See below. South-East Italy. C. I. L. ix. (1883). Calabria, Apulia, Samnium, Sabini, Picenum. Supplement in Eph. Epigr. viii. South- West Italy. C. I. L. x. (1883). Part I. Bruttii, Lu- cania, Campania. C /. Z. iv. ( 1 8 7 1 ). Inscriptiones parietariae Pompeianae, &c. Supplements in Eph. Epigr. i, viii. Sicily, Sardinia, Corsica. C. I. L. x. Part II. Inscriptions from Italy are published as they are discovered in the Notizie degli Scavi {Atti della reale Accademia dei Lincei). Rome, from 1875. BIBLIOGRAPHY. xxiii Supplemental volumes for Italy will in future be published by the Accademia dei Lincei as Corporis Inscriptiomcm Latinaruf)i Suppkmenta Italica. See above under C. I. L. v. WESTERN EUROPE. Spain. C. I. L. ii. (1869). Suppkmentum (1892). Gallia Narbonensis. C. I. L. xii. (1888). The Three Gauls Ir^- 7- r -i I c. /. L. xni. I Germany (Upper and Lower) ) See Waltzing for list of the most important epigraphical works relating to Gaul and the Rhine. The following are referred to in this book : — A. de Boissieu. Inscriptions antiques de Lyon. Lyon, 1846-54. (De Boissieu.) A. Allmer and P. Dissard. Musee de Lyon. Inscriptiojis antiques. Lyon, 1888-92. (Allmer, Lyon.) A. Allmer. Revue Epigraphique du Midi de la France. Vienne, from 1880. C. I. Rh. = Corpus Inscriptionum RAenanaruni, by W. Brambach. Elberfeld, 1867. Westdeutsche Zeitschrift (with Korrespondenzblatt). Trier, from 1882. Jahrbilcher des Vereins von Alterthumsfreimden im Rhein- lande. Bonn, from 1842. {Bonner Jahrbuch.) Britain. C. I. L. vii. (1873). Supplements in Eph. Epigr. iii, iv, vii. Fresh discoveries appear in The Archaeo- logical Journal. EASTERN EUROPE. 1 ^- ^- ^- "^- ^^^^ ^^- ^^^73)- This part / also contains the Monumentum Raetia. Noricum. Ancyranujn, Edictum Diocletiani, Diplomata Militaria, &c. Danubian provinces \ Dalmatia. Greek provinces in Europe. ASIATIC PROVINCES. C.LL.in. Part I. (1873). Suppkmentum. Fasc. I. (1889). Egypt, Syria, Asia Minor, Gk. Europe, Lower Moesia. Asia Minor. I Fasc. IL (1891). Dacia, Upper Syria, &c. Moesia, Dalmatia. EGYPT, with the Cyrenaica & Crete XXIV BIBLIOGRAPHY. THE AFRICAN PROVINCES. C. /. Z. viii. (1881). Part I. Tripolitana, Byzacena, Africa Proconsularis, Numidia. Part II. Mauretania. Supplementum. Fasc. I. (1891). Tripolitana, Byzacena, Africa Proconsularis. Supplements to Numidia and Mauretania in Eph. Epigr. V, vii. The following are collections of selected inscriptions : — Inscriptionum Latinarum sekctarum ampHssima collectio. Vols, i, ii, by I. C. Orelli. Zurich, 1828. Vol. iii, by W. Henzen, 1856. (Henzen.) W-=- Exempla Inscriptionum Latinarum, by G. Wilmanns. Berlin, 1873- The new selection by H. Dessau {Inscriptiones Latinae Selectae. Vol. i. Berlin, 1892) is at present unfinished, and no references to it have been given. Coins are cited from the following authorities : — Jos. Eckhel. Doctritia 7iumorum veterum. Vol. vi. 2nd edition. Vienna, 1828. (Eckhel.) H. Cohen. Description historiqiie des Mommies f rappees sous r Empire Romain communement appelees Medailles Impenales. 2nd edition. Paris and London. Vol. i, 1880. Vol. ii, 1882. (Cohen.) References are given to the following works on Roman History and Antiquities. C. G. Bruns. Pontes luris Roniani Antiqid. 5th edition, by Mommsen. Freiburg i. Br. 1887. (Bruns Fotites.) R. Cagnat. L'Armee Romaine d'Afrique et I'occupation militaire de I'Afrique sous les Einpereurs. Paris, 1892. C. Daremberg and E. Saglio. Dictionnaire des Antiqidtcs Grecques et Romaines. Paris, 1873-92. W. Henzen. Acta Fratrum Arvalium. Berlin, 1874. O. Hirschfeld. Untersnchiingen auf dem Gebiete der romischen Venvaltungsgeschichte. Berlin, 1876. \V. Liebenam. Die Legaten in den romischen Provinzen von Augustus bis Diode tian. Leipzig, 1888. BIBLIOGRAPHY. xxv Th. Mommsen. Rbmisches Staatsrecht. Leipzig. Vol. ii (The Magistrates and the Emperor). 3rd edition, 1887. Vol. iii (People and Senate), 1888. {St. R.). Res Gestae divi Augjisti ex monu7ne7itis Ancyrano et Apolloniensi. 2nd edition. Berlin, 1883. The Provinces of the Roman Empire from Caesar to Diocletian. Translated by W. P. Dickson. London, 1886. H. Schiller. Geschichte der romischen Kaiserzeit. Vol. i. Gotha, 1883. ' Ph. Le Bas (continued by W. H. Waddington). Voyage archeologi- que en Grece et en Asie Mineure. Inscriptions. 3 vols. Paris, 1847, &c. (Le Bas.) W. H. Waddington (and P. Foucart). Explication des Inscrip- tions, &c. 3 vols. (Waddington.) Other references are given in full. xxvu ABBREVIATIONS [noi explained in the iextl. AVG Augustus. C Gaius. CN Gnaeus. COS Consul. D 1 Decimus. D Dedit. D • M Dis Manibus. F Filius, filia. IMP Imperator. L Libertus. L Lucius. LEG Legatus. LEG Legio. M Marcus. M • V Millia passuum. N Nepos. N Numerius. P Publius. P • M Pontifex Maximus. P • P Pater Patriae. P • R Populus Romanus. PR Praetor. Q Quaestor. Q Quintus. s • c Senatus consulto. SEX Sextus. S • F Sacris faciundis. S • P • Q ■ • R Senatus Populusque Romanus. T Titus. TI, TIB Tiberius. PART I. AUGUSTUS. B.C. 31-A.D. 14. I. THE VICTORY OF OCTAVIANUS, AND THE FOUNDATION OF THE PRINCIPATE. The Triumph in B.C. 29. I. C /. L. vi. 873. Found in the Forum at Rome, near the Temple of Castor. The date is B.C. 29. SENATVS • POPVLVSQVE • ROMANVS Imp • caesarI • dIvI • ivlI • f • cos • qvinct COS • DESIGN • SEXT • IMP • SEPT REPVBLICA • CONSERVATA 2. Cohen, i. p. 66, No. 30. Eckhel, vi. 88. Aureus of b.c. 27. The represent- ations are explained by Mon. Anc. 6. 16, quoted on p. 4, and cf. Babelon, Mommies de la Re'pubhque, p. 311, No. i ; Cohen, i. p. 116, No. 385. Several coins of Augustus with ob cives scrvatos refer to the same occasion. Obverse. CAESAR COS. VII. CIVIBVS SERVATEIS. Head of Augustus. Reverse. AVGVSTVS S. C. Eagle holding a wreath, between two boughs of laurel. Whatever may have been ^le form of the monument with B PART I.— A UG USTUS. which No. I was originally connected, there can be little doubt that it was intended to be a record of the great event of B.C. 29 — the triple Triumph of Octavianus. The view here presented of Octavianus as the saviour of the Roman Commonwealth is explained by the fear, prevalent before the battle of Actium, that Antonius would transfer the centre of power from Rome to Alexandria, as part of his scheme for a restored Hellenistic Monarchy (cf. p. 21). Dio Cass. 50. 4 : kixicmvcTav . . . otl, av Kparr](Tr\, rriv re ttoXlv a(f)(ov Trj KXeoTTCLTpa ^apulrai koL to Kparos h rrp AtyvnTov p.eTa6riar€L. Cf. 49. 40. 3, 50. 3. 5, for other allusions to Alexandria. Among contemporary references cf. Hor. i C. 37. 6 : Capitolio regina demeiites riimas^ fmms et iinperio parabat. Cf. 3. 3. 20, ^"j sqq. The corona civica (No. 2) conferred on Augustus in B.C. 27 (cf. No. 4 on which Mommsen remarks ' qui scripsit fastos Praenestinos"'.' . . minus proprie rem explicavit ' Res Gcst. D. Atig. 151) is explained by his own words [Mon. Anc. I. 14): victorqiie omnihus \} siiperstiti\btis civibiis peperci. Cf. Dio Cass. ^0^. 16. 4: TO re Tas h6.(^va's irpb TUiv jiacnkeLcov avTov TTpoTidecrdai, koI to tov crTt^avov tov hpvivov virep avT5>v apTaaOai, t6t€ ol &>s Koi a^l Tovs re TToAe/xiou? vikS>vtl /cat tovs TtoXiTas cra>CovTL i\}/r](pi(r6r]. Pliny, N. N. 16. 8 : [Augustus coronam) civicam a gencre Jmmano acccpit, is thinking rather of Actium as the end of the civil wars. Mommsen, Res Gestae D. Atignsti, 149-151. Sitzimgsberichte der k. prcuss. Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin, 1889 {Festrede), 27-29. Annexation of Egypt : B.C. 30. C. I. L.\\. 701. On the obelisk of the Piazza del Popolo, Rome. The inscrip- tion is repeated on both the north and south faces of the pedestal. The obelisk was erected by Augustus on the spina of the Circus Maximus, where it was unearthed in 1587 by Sixtus V, who had it moved to its present position. Its fellow, with a similar inscription [C. I. L. vi. 702), stands on Monte Citorio /. THE VICTORY OF OCTAVIANUS. 3 near its original site in the Campus Martins. Both are described by PHny, H. N. 36. 71. ZMP • CAESAR • Divl • F AVGVSTVS PONTIFEX • MAXIMVS tUP ' XU • COS • XI • TRIE • POT • XIV 5 AEGVPTU • IN • POTESTATEM POPVLI • ROMANI • REDACTA .fOLl • DONUM • DEDIT Mon. Anc. 5. 24 : Aegyptum imperio popuH [Rojmani adieci. This monument was erected in B.C. 10, twenty years after the annexation of Egypt ; but for purposes of historical illustration it may be taken as a contemporary record of an event which, as Mommsen says {Provinces, ii. 233), was coincident both in point of time and of organic connection with the organisation of the Principate. It will be noticed that the annexation of Egypt is spoken of here (11. 5, 6) in precisely the same way as in the Ancyran Monument (cf. Mon. Anc, 5* 9* omnium proifJ.ncianim popiili Romani'\ gtiibus finitimae fuerunt gcntcs quae n\on parcrent imperio nos\iro fines anxi where the special reference is to the pro- vinciae Caesai'is). The reasons which caused Egypt to be administered on a different system from that of the ordinary provinces, are described by Tacitus, Ann. 2. 59. 4 : Aiigiistus . . . seposnit Aegypt7im ne fame nrgcret Italiam qnisquis earn provinciam claustraque terrae ac maris quamvis Icvi praesidio adversiun ingentes exercitns insedisset. Hist. i. 11 : Aegyptum copiasqiie qtiibus cocrccretur iam inde a divo Angus to equitcs Romani ohtinent loco regum : ita visum expcdire provinciam aditu difficilem, annonae fectmdam, superstitione ac lascivia discordem et mobilem, insciam Icgum, ignaram inagistratuum, domi retinere. B 2 PART I.— A UG USTUS. The Foundation of the Principate, B.C. 27. C. I. L. i. p. 312. Entry for Jan. 13 in the Fasti Praenestini. For the arrangement of the Calendars see Introduction, p. xv. The first notice is too fragmentary to be restored. The restoration of the second is made possible by the passage from the Ancyran Monument quoted below. E EIDN^ PVTA ID • ES NON AL Corona • qvern<« titi su- per iamiam doimts. imp. caesaris AVGVSTI • PONER^/7/r seiia- tiis decrevit qiiod rem piiblicam P • R • RESTZTVI2' Mon.Anc. 6. 13 : in coiisulatu sexto et septimo, b[ella ubi civiljia exstinxeram per consensum universorum [potitus rerum omn^ium, rem publicara ex mea potestate in senat[us populique Romani a]rbitiium transtuli. Quo pro merito meo Senatu^s consulto Aug(ustus) appe]llatus sum et laureis postes aedium mearum v[estiti publice coronaq]ue civica super ianuam meam fixa est. The catch-word restitiita respiihlica is often repeated in some form or other by the contemporaries of Augustus. Cf. Ovid, Fast. i. 589: redditaqiie est omJiis poptdo provincia nostro. Velleius, 3. 89. 3 : (after Actium) restitiita vis legibus, iudiciis auctoritas, senatid maiestas, imperium viagistratimm ad pristiniim redactiim viodiim . . . prisca ilia et antiqiia rei public ae forma revocata. C. I. L. vi. 1527 [Elogium Tnriae) d. 25 : pacato orbe ierrariim res\titnt^a reptiblica. By the side of these passages and of the words of Augustus in the Ancyran Monument, may be placed the legend on a cisto- phorus of B. C. 28 (Eckhel, vi. 83) : imp. Caesar divi f. cos. VI, liber tatis p. R. vindex, with Pax on the reverse. The reference in every case is to the surrender by Octavianus in B.C. 27 of the constituent power conferred on him and /. THE VICTORY OF OCTA VIANUS. 5 his colleagues in the Triumvirate in B.C. 43. On the re- signation of the sole surviving mandatory of that power, the Government of the State once more constitutionally- belonged to the Senatus Populusquc Romanus, and this implied the restoration of (1) the regular organs of the Constitution — the Comitia and Judicia, and (2) the govern- ment of the Senate and People in the provinces, including the command of the armies of the State. But while the Roman Commonwealth was restored, the position of Octa- vianus himself was now constitutionally defined, and hence later writers insist, in connection with the events of B.C. 28-27, not on the restitutio rei piiblicae but on the foundation of the Principate. Dio Cass. 52. i : Ik h\ tovtov ixovapx^elaOai avOa cLKpLjSGii ijp^avTo. Tacitus, Ann. 3. 28. 3: sexto devmm con- sidatiL Caesar Augustus, potentiae sectirus, quae iritiinviratu iusserat abolevit deditque iura quis pace et principe iiteremur. Eutropius, 7. 8 : ex eo rempublicam per quadraginta et quattuor amios solus obtinuit. So Strabo, though a contemporary of Augustus, writing (not after A.D. 23) for the Greek half of the Empire says (17. 3. 25, p. 840): 7/ Txarpls iTTiTp(\}/€v avT(2 ri]v TTpocTTaaiav r?;s i]yep.ov\.as. The essential feature of the position created for Octavianus in B.C. 27 was the tenure of the Consulship with extended powers. While the custom of the later Republic restricted the acting Consul to Rome and Italy, that restriction was now, in his case, abolished, and moreover for the next ten years his Consulships were to be continuous. With this position the following powers were combined, (i) The govern- ment of those provinces (except Africa) in which an army was required (Dio Cass. ^'^. 12, i^)- Suet. Aug. 47). (2) The sole command of the army (Dio Cass. ^'^. 12. 3 : awrob- Se hi] p.uvo^ KoX 6-nka €x?y '^«' (TrpartwTas rpiff)-!]). (3) The right of declaring war and making peace, i.e. the control of the foreign policy of the State (Strabo, 17. 3. 25, p. 840: -noXep-ov kqI dpijvi]^ KaTtaTr] Kvpios hta j3lov. Cf. No. 70. Dio Cass. ^^. 17. 5). All FA R T I.— A UG USTUS. these powers were extensions of his position as acting Consul, and his inipcriiim would be constitutionally described as considare (cf. Tac. Ann. i. 2: consulevi se f evens). Such a combination of powers did not differ in principle from arrange- ments previously made under the Republic, and Augustus was able to say with truth [Alon. Anc. Gr. 3. 17): apx.V ovh^\}\la\v TtoS^pa ia 7rd]rp[ta] e[^]T/ hiho\i.ivr\v avth(.^a\i.-i]V. Mommsen, Res Gestae Divi Aug. 145-149. Staatsrccht, ii. 745, 870. Prof. Veiham, Journal of Philology, xvii. (1888), 32-36. The Revised Constitution of B.C. 23. C. I. L. i. p. 472, vi. 2014. 14-17, xiv. 2240. Fragment of the Fasti Feriarttm Latinaritrn for b. c. 23, found in the ruins of the Temple of Jupiter Latiaris on the summit of the Mons Albanus, where the annual celebration took place. Now in the Museum at Naples. The form of the restoration is based on the more perfect fragments. The day of the month in 1. 2 is illegible. The date of the abdication is suggested by the regular time for a change of Consuls at the beginning of the second half of the year. Cf. Fasti Cons. C. I. L. i. p. 442. St. R. ii. 83, 84. imp. caesare xi fN'PIS0NE«C0S l[aiinae) {feriae) j\tiernnf) • IVL zjnp. caesAR • IN MONTE FVIT k{alendis) iul{iis){f) imp. ^^ESAR • COS ABDICAVIT 6. Cohen, i. p. 124, No. 437. Cf. Eckhel, vi. 91, 92. Middle bronze of B.C. 23. Obverse. CAESAR AVGVST. PONT. MAX. TRIBUNIC. POTEST. Head of Augustus. Reverse. A. LICIN. NERVA SILIAN(?«) III VIR A{nro) A{rgento) A{ere) Y{lando) Y[eriiindo) round S. C. The resignation of the Consulship by Augustus in B. C. 23 (with No. 5, cf. Dio Cass. ^'>^. 32. 3 : aTreiTre t\v vtraTeiav h 'AX^avov iXdoop) was a turning-point in the history of the Principate, for it was thereby severed from any essential /. THE VICTORY OF OCT A VI AN US. 7 connection with the Republican magistracies. The reason for the step must have been the desire to put the Constitu- tion of the Principate on a consistent and permanent basis (cf. Suet. Aiig. 38 : ita niiJii salvam ac sospitevi rem piiblicam sistere in sua sede liceat ... iit optimi status auctor dicar, et moistens nt ferain ineciim spem mansiLra in vestigio sua fnnda- menta rei publicae quae iecero\ for though there were practical inconveniences connected with the Emperor's tenure of the Consulship, such as the presence of a colleague, annual election, the danger of rousing the hostility of the Senatorial order by appropriating one of the two highest prizes of the official career, yet they were hardly felt at the time. How little e.g. the Senatorial grievance suggested above was appreciated, may be seen from the fact that more than once in the years immediately following B.C. 33, only one Consul was elected and the other place left vacant in the hope of inducing Augustus to take it (Dio Cass. 54. 6. 3, 10). By resigning the Consulship Augustus did not lose his command of the army and of his own provinces (his ini- perimn being now described as proconsnlare), except that (i) instead of having as Consul an imperinm mains over Pro- consuls in the Senatorial provinces, he now, as one Pro- consul among many, had only an imperinm aeqimm, and (2) this was no longer valid in Rome. In regard to both points his old position was at once restored to him by the Senate. Dio Cass, ^^i- 32- 5 • ''"'i^ """^ ^9y^W "^^W avdvirarov ecraet KaOdira^ ^X^'-^ wcrre /y.r;re iv ttj ecro'So) Tjj eto-co tov TTcojUTjptou Kara- Tidea-daL avT'i]v \x-fiT avdis avaveovaOai, Kai €v rw vttiik6(o to ttX^Iov TUiv kKaaraxoOi apyovrutv l certainly it 22 PART I.— A UG USTUS. was their pressure which compelled him in B.C. 20 to carry out his part of the bargain, No. 20. One indication of the instability of the position of Phraates at this time is the break in his coinage beginning in the latter part of B.C. 23 and lasting for several years. Augustus was not satisfied with a mere concession of the principle of Roman superiority on the part of Parthia, and at the same time that the standards were restored, Armenia, the land where the interests of Rome and Parthia came chiefly into colHsion, was brought back to the position of a Roman client-state to which it had been reduced by Pompeius in B.C. 66 {Mon. Anc. 5. 24), and No. 21 therefore speaks of it as included in the Empire (Mommsen, i^^j- Gestae, 112). It was just here that the settlement of B.C. 20 failed, for the national party in Armenia found a natural rallying-point in Parthia, and in B.C. i Gains Caesar had to be sent to the East to invest Ariobarzanes with the kingdom, just as Tiberius had invested Tigranes in B. C. 20 ; while to make the parallel complete, it was the internal troubles of Parthia which com- pelled Phraataces to accept the new arrangement (Dio Cass. 55. 10 a. 4), which was not more permanent than the former one. Before the death of Augustus, Armenia had once more gone over to the Parthian side. Cf Tac. Ann. 2. 3. 2 : {Ar- incnici) vacua tunc interqne Parthormn et Romanas opes in- jida. 2. 56. Mommsen, Res Gi'sfni' D. Aiigiisfi, 109-118, 124-126. Section on Parthia by Prof. A. von Gutschmid in article Persia, Encyclopaedia Britaniiica, 9th ed. Prof. P. Gardner, The Paiihian Coinage, p. 42 sqq. Colonies of Augustus in Pisidia. 22. C. I. L. iii. Sitppl. 6974. Milestone from the site of Comama. The last word of 1. 5 is very fragmentary. In the Corpus it is suggested that it may be regalim. The date is b. c. 6. IMP CAESAR DIVI /. AVGVS///i- pO}lt //. ORGANISATION OF THE PROVINCES. 23 MAXIM COS XI D^S XTI IMP XV TR pOT 5 XIIX VIAM CVRANTE • CORN AQVILA LEG SVO PRO PR FECIT CXXII This is the milestone from which Mommsen has inferred the date of the foundation of the Pisidian mihtary colonies of Augustus. It being the policy of the Imperial Govern- ment to protect the existing (Hellenic) civilisation of the provinces of the East, without attempting to Latinise them, the Roman colonies there are, generally speaking, few and isolated (e. g. Berytus). But in the case of Pisidia there were special circumstances. The tribes which inhabited the moun- tain ranges between Lycia and Cilicia were practically un- touched by Hellenism, and moreover they were a standing danger to peace. Here accordingly Augustus founded a series of colonies [Alon. Anc. 5. 36), the list of which has gradually been completed by the evidence of coins and inscriptions. Those known are, Antioch, Olbasa, Comama, Cremna, Parlais (probably at the south end of lake Ca- ralitis), and Lystra. They formed a chain of garrisons which held the mountain tribes of Pisidia, Isauria, and Western Cilicia (the Homonadenses, Tac. Aim. 3. 48. 2) in check, and at the same time acted as civilising agencies. Antioch had a distinctively Latin character as is evidenced by the relatively large number of Latin inscriptions found there. Its connection with the other colonies as their centre is shown by No. 22, which, as Prof. Ramsay has pointed out, makes it probable that Antioch was the starting-point of the road (the number of miles exactly corresponds with that in the Tabula Peutingeriana between Antioch and Comama via Apollonia), and is further illustrated by the Greek inscription found near the site of Antioch (Sterrett, Wolfe Expedition, No. 352) : 24 PART I.— AUG US TUS. Ti]v XajJLTTpoTaTrjv ^ AvTioyJ(av KoXcovLav rj XaimpoTaTi] Ava-Tpiutv KoAcoz'ta 7-7/2' aheX(f)r]V rw Tij^i '0/xoroias aydA/xari irdjxriaiv. Prof. Ramsay, Geography of Asia Minor, 46, 57, 390, 398. Mommsen. Provinces, i. 334-337- Syria under P. Sulpicius Quirinius, A.D. 6. 23. C /. L. iii. Siippl. 6687. This inscription was first noted in 1674. The marble afterwards disappeared, and till recently the copy w^as regarded as a forgery (cf. C. I. L. v. 136*) partly on account of the reference to the Census of Quirinius in 1. 9. In 1880 the lower part (printed below in capitals) was discovered at Venice in the foundations of the house in which it was originally said to have been preserved, and it is now admitted by Mommsen to be genuine {Eph. Epigr. iv. p. 537). It came no doubt from Berytus, the only colony (1. 17) in Syria in the time of Augustus with an appreciable Latin element, and there it must have been that Secundus held the municipal offices of 11. 18, 19. 1. 22 : hf^oc) mionumetitunt) hieredeni) n(on) s(eqttHiir). Q. Aemilius Q. f. Pal(atina) (tribu) Secundus^ [///] castris divi Aug. s[?//;] P. Sulpi[^]io Quirinio le[^(?/(?] 5 C[«]esaris Syriae honori- bus decoratus, pr[«]efect(us) cohort(is) Aug(ustae) I, pr[rt']efect(us) cohort(is) II classicae, IDEM iussu Quirini CENSVM ■ EGl 10 ApamENAE • CIVITATIS • MIL LIVAI • HOxMIN • CiVIVM • CXVTI Idem • missv • qvirini • adversvs ITVRAEOS • in • LIBANO • MONTE • CASTELLVM • EORVM • CEPI • ET • ANTE 15 mILITIEM • PRAEFECT • FABRVM • DELATVS • A • DVOBVS • COS • AD • AE RARIVM ET • IN • COLONIA • QVAESTOR • AEDIL • II • DVVM VIR • H PONTIFEXS //. ORGANISATION OF THE PROVINCES. 25 20 IBI • POSITI • SVNT • Q • AEMILIVS • Q • F • PAL SECVNDVS • F-ET • AEMILIA • CHIA • LIB' H • M • AMPLIVS • n • N • S • The events mentioned in 11. 9-14 took place during the second tenure by Ouirinius of the Governorship of Syria in A.D. 6 (the first was in B.C. 3-3). The date is fixed by the reference to the Census in Josephus, Anf. 18. 2 : tmv a-noTi\xi]- crecov irepas ixovcroiv dl kyivovro TptaKoaTM Kal e/38o/xa) eret [x^Ta 'AvTcaviov iv 'Aktlco Tjrrav Kaiaapos. The Census in a province was ordinarily carried out by officials of equestrian rank on the governor's staff to whom special districts were assigned. Hence it is probable that Secundus was holding one of the pracfcctiirae of 11. 6-8 when he took the Census at Apamea, and the other will then belong to his expedition against the Ityraei. Cf. C. I. L. xiv. 3955 =^W. 1815 : Gn. Miinatiits M. f. Pal. Aureliiis Bassus, proc{iirator) Attg{usii), praef. fabr., praef. coh. Ill sagittariornin, praef. coh. itertnn II Astitriim, censitor civiinn Roinanorinn coloniae Victricensis quae est in Brittannia Cavialodiini, &^e. (St. R. ii. 1093). For the Census in other provinces under Augustus, cf. the cases of Gaul (Liv. Ep. 134, 136. Dio Cass. ^^. 3 2. 5. Tac. A/i/i. I. 31. 2), and Lusitania (C.I.L. x. 680: [ad iinp^ Caesar e Aug. \i)iissiis pro\ censor e ad Lns\itanos\. The following points in the inscription may also be noticed. The honores mentioned in 1. 5 are the eqiiestres militiae which follow. Cf. C. I. L. \yi. 3158 : . . . nsnni castre{ii)sibHs Cae- saris AiigHst[i) suniviis \cq\n[es\tris ordinis honoribns. In 1. 7 the proper name of the cohort (regularly that of the people among whom it was recruited) has been omitted. The praefecti fabnivi (1. 15) had lost their exclusively military character by the time of Augustus, and are found on the staff of the governor of an incrmis provincia like Asia (e.g. C.I.L. iii. Suppl. ']0^g, praef. fabr. to M'. Lepidus, Pro- consul of Asia in A.D. 26, Tac. Ann. 4. ^6. 3). For the practice of outgoing Consuls and Praetors registering the 26 PART I.— A UG USTUS. names oi \\\q\x praefecti fabrinn at the Treasury, cf. Cic. pro Ball). 28. 63 : [Caesar) in practi/ra, in consul at u, pracfectnm fahruvi dctnlit. For the iteration (1. 16: a duobns cos.) cf. C. I. L. iii. Suppl. 6983 : C. Itdins \_Aqnila priacf. fabr. bis in acrar. delatiis a cos. A. Gabin\io Sccnndo, Tci\2iro Statilio Cor vino. Mommsen, Res Gestae Divi Aug. 166, 175. C. 1. L. iii. Suppl. pp. 122, 3. III. THE ORGANISATION OF ROME AND ITALY. Rome. 24. C. /. L. vi. 1244. At Rome over the Porta S. Lorenzo, where the three channels of the Aquae Marcia, Tepula, and luHa (hence aquaruni omnium., 1. 4) cross the road. The date is B.C. 5-4. Below this inscription records of restorations of the Marcia by Titus in a. d. 79, and by Caracalla in a. d. 212 have been added. Imp- CAESAR • dIvI • ivlI • f • avgvstvs PONTIFEX • MAXIMVS • COS • XII TRIBVNIC • POTEST AT • XIX • IMP • XIIII RIVOS • AQVARVM • OMNIVM • REFECIT Mon. Anc.a,. 10: rivos aquarum compluribus locis vetustate labentes refeci, et aquam quae Marcia appellatur duplicavi fonte novo in rivum eius inmisso. C. I. L. vi. 1235/; Found on the right bank of the Tiber near the Farnesina. Censorinus and Gallus were Consuls in b. c. 8. The expansion r'ectd) rijgore) in 1. 4 is made certain by a recently discovered cippus of Antoninus Pius on which the words are written in full. Bull. Com. xviii. (1890), 326. Cp. Ulp. Dig. 43. 15. I. 5 : rtpa ita rede definietur id quod flumen contiiiet naturalem rigorem ciirsus sui tencns. C • MARCIVS • L • F • CENSORINVS C • ASINIVS • C • F • GALLVS COS EX • S • C • TERMIN • R • R • PROX • CIPP • P • XX 5 CVRATORES • RIPARVM • QVI • PRIMI • TERMINAVER EX • S • C • RESTITVERVNT ///. ORGANISATION OF ROME AND ITALY. 27 Grains) Marcins L. f. Ccnsorinns, G{aiits) Asinins C. f. Callus co[n)s[nlcs) ex s[cimtus) c'yonsnlto) icrviin{avcriint). R'yccto) }\igore) prox[inuts) cipp{its) p{cdes) XX. Cnratores ripariun qui privii tcr)ninavcr{7t.nt) ex s. c. rcstituerunt. 26. C. I. L. vi. 1236 (7. On a cippus of travertine, found in its original position on the right bank of the Tiber opposite the Ripetta. Most of the examples of this type also give the distance to the next stone as in the case of No. 25. The seventeenth year of the tribimicia pofcstas of Augustus was from June 27th B. c. 7 to June 26th B.C. 6. IxMP • CAESAR • DIVI • F AVGVSTVS PONTIFEX • MAXIMVS TRIBVNIC • POTEST • XVII EX • S • C • TERMINAVIT 27. C. I. L. ix. 3306. Found at Castelvecchio Subrego (Superaequum) and pre- ser\'ed there. Cf Liebenam, Legaten in den rum. Provinsen, 397. Quaesiior index was the title of the inferior class of presidents of the qnaestiones perpetitae, chosen from those who had not proceeded beyond the aedileship as opposed to the praeiores quaesitores {Sf. R. ii. 586. IV. 1130, note 4). Q • VARIO • Q • F • GEMINO • LEG • DIvI • AVG • H PRO • COS • PR • TR • PL 5 Q • QVAESIT • IV Die P R A E F • F R V M • BAND X • V I R • STL • I V D I C CVRATORI • AEDIVM • SACR M O N V M E N T O R • Q V E • P \' P, L I C 10 TVENDORVM IS • PRIMVS • OMNIVM • PAELIGN • SENATOR FACTVS • EST • ET • EOS • IIONORES • GESSIT SVPERAEQVANI • PVBLICE P A T R O N O 28 PART I.— A UG USTUS. Q. Vario Q.f. Gcviiiw, Icgiato) divi A iig{tt.sti) II, proco{n)s{tili), pr[aetori), ir{ibuno) pl{ebis\ q{tiaestori), quaesit[ori) i2idic{i), praef{ccto) fruniienti) daud{i), X vir{o) stliitibus) mdic{andis), ciiratori aediinn sacr^aviini) inonujncntor[uvt)gue pnblic{or2ivi) tucndoriim. Is prinms onmiiun Paclign{orti7n) senator f actus est et COS honores gessit. Super aeqiiani piiblice patrono. Mon. Anc. Gr. 3. 5 : ov TraprjTrjardfnjv (v rfi fifjifTTrj [toC] a\_eLT'\ov crndvfi t^v eiTtixiXeiav t^j dyopdi, rjv ov[tus fmTrjSev^cra, war kv oXijais yfifpa[ts to'\v vapovTOs Aa/xti^tas avTos, eTretSj/Trep iKarpaT^vcreLv bi avTTJs ?//-ieAAei', €TTe[X€Xridi]) is suggestive of the two reasons which made the aira viartun an important element in the administration of Italy and the Empire. On the one hand the Via Flaminia was the great means of communication by land between Rome and the Empire, and not the least im- portant of the creations of Augustus was the Imperial despatch service which must have largely used this road (Suet. Ajig. 49). On the other hand the c7iratores of that and the other roads in Italy, who in B. C. 20 replaced the temporary commissioners of B.C. 27, through the local jurisdiction which they exercised took no small share in the government of the country. The atra was constitutionally transferred to the Emperor (Dio Cass. 54- ^' 4 (b. C. 20) : ron 8e avros re TpoaraTrji t(Lv Trepl Tr]v 'Pcajxrjv 6b(av aipdOeis. Cf. the case of the cura aqiiaj'inn. Probably all the ciirae were established in the same manner St. R.\\. 1044), who then appointed a curator for each of the great roads (Dio Cass. 1. c). The funds for the department were paid through the Aerarium, but were provided to a large extent by the Emperor himself (Statins, Silv. 3. 3. 102, men- tions the longe series porrecta viaruni as one of the regular expenses of the Fiscus). A special liberality of this kind in B.C. 16 was commemorated by No. 30. There are similar coins of the next year (Cohen, i. p. 143 : tr. pot. VIII). D 3 36 PART I.— AUGUSTUS. ^ ' — > -j^ ^ m tf} •V, J3 S I 2 S - -S ?„ rt OJ ^ 3 v< S s-1 C Oj 1-1 •—< s • 6 o S & CO -5 .5- >, j3 cT 3 u rA 7k o .- .-. ,„ o tS - rt t: > ■" he ►--^ .5 — ^ "^ u a u ti "r S-' <><<•§ g c3 p « C CO .s 5 .g ^ c . S „ ^ .5 ,^ •- 3 -^ i; ^- « 2 =0 '^ '^ -g ' ^ "^ -s § .2 S ^ ^ -e -I [ ; ? tn S ^ *>-' o - 25- 5)- These sub-Alpine districts illustrate the ways in which Rome dealt with subject peoples when it was not possible or advisable to include them in a province of the ordinary type. (i) The policy of attaching native communities [gejites, civifates, oppidd) as subjects to Roman towns in their neigh- bourhood {atiribuere, coiitr'ibucre), dating in this district from the times of the Republic (Plin. H. N. 3. 138 : in the list of the Tropaea are not included the communities attributae municipiis lege Pompcia [b. C. 89], cf. Tac. Hist. 3. 34. 2 : [Cremona founded B.C. 218] adnexii conubiisque gentium adolevit Jloruitquc), was now extended to the newly conquered tribes in the central and eastern part of the southern slope of the Alps. Thus the Bergalei were ' attributed ' to Comum (see No. 79. 10) ; the Trumpilini, Benacenses, Camunni, Sabini to Brixia (Plin. H. N. 3. 134. C. I. L. v. pp. 512, 515); the Anauni, Tulliasses, Sinduni, to Tridentum (see No. 79. 23) ; the Carni and Catali to Tergeste {C. I. L. v. 532. 2. 3= W. 693. 45 : Carni Catalique attributi a divo Augusto rei publicae ///. ORGANISATION OF ROME AND ITALY. 39 nostrae). These communities retain a distinct existence (hence they occasionally appear as the domiciles of legionaries coming from them, C. I. L. iii. Suppl. 7453 epitaph of L. Plinms Sex. f. Fah[ia) [trihti) doino Trtiviplia mil[es) leg{ionis) XX &~'C.), but they have no civil organisation of their own (there are only traces of the native headman. C. I. L. v. 4910: princeps Trtiviplinortim., 4^93 : princeps Sabinoriim) and are governed by the town magistrates. The intention of this arrangement was primarily to provide for the government of the tribes, but ultimately to raise them by force of contact to the level of the governing community, so that they might be admitted to share the full rights of citizenship with it. (Originally they are of inferior political status, Plin. H. N. 3. 133 : Lathii inris Enganeae gentcs [among them the Trumpilini and Camunni]. The Carni and Catali were apparently iiiris pei-egrijii before the iiis Lathmvi was given by Antoninus Pius, C. I. L. v. 532). Cf. No. 79 for the development in the case of the Anauni. (2) The western Alps were treated on a different principle. Here, whether in view of stronger national unions among the native communities, or that for other reasons the danger to peace was greater, a system of centralisation under military commanders was adopted. The tribes were formed by groups into governmental districts, which were placed under officials of equestrian rank appointed by the Emperor. Thus the Alpes Maritimae was governed by a pracfectiis. He occurs in No. 90 : praefectiis civitatium in Alpibiis Maritumis, and may be compared with the pj'aefcctits civitatium Mocsiae et Treballiae of the same inscription, the analogous praefccttis gentis Miisidaviiormii {C. I. L. viii. 5351), pracfcctus gcntis Cinithiorwn {C. I. L. viii. 10500), ex praefccto gcntis Masat . . . {C. /. L. viii. 9195) in Africa, and Tac. Ann. 4. 72. 2 : Olcnnius e primipilaribns rcgendis Frisiis inpositiis. Cf. p. 115. This method of governing districts, which for special reasons were left outside the regular system of provincial administration, 40 PART I.— A UG USTUS. was an extension of the practice at the end of the Republic by which the governor sent praefccti to administer outlying portions of the province (Cic. ad Att. ^. i\. 6-. Q. Vohisinin . . . mist m Cypruin nt ibi pauculos dies esset, ne cives Roman i paiici qui illic negotiantiir ws sibi dictum fiegarent ; nam evocari ex instda Cyprios non licet). By A.D. 69 the prae- fectus had been replaced by d, procurator (Tac. Hist. 2. 12. 5). The change, though mainly one of name [nomine magis mutato quam rerum. forma, Mommsen in C. I. L. v. p, 902), may have been partly due to an increase in the fiscal importance of the district consequent on its advance in civilisation (cf. Tac. Ann. 15. 32: eodem aniio [a. D. 63] Caesar nationes Alpium Maritimarum in ius Latii transiidit). For the military force under the praejectus and procurator cf. Tac. Hist. 2. 14. 3 : Liguruvi cohors vetus loci auxilium. Several epitaphs of soldiers of the cohors I Ligurum have come from Cemenelum, the chief place in the Maritime Alps {C. I. L. v. p. 903). For the local militia see Tac. Hist. 2. 12. 5. The Alpes Cottiae, where a national union of the tribes had existed from pre-Roman times (Regnum Cottii), were also governed by di praefectus, but here the native dynasty was made use of, the princes of the house of Cottius appearing as the praefccti appointed by the Emperor (No. 32), an arrange- ment which is explained by Pliny H. N. 3. 138 (quoted above). Under Claudius they even recovered their old title and independence (Dio Cass. 60. 24. 4), but on the extinction of the line Nero restored the province (Suet. Nero, 18). O. Hirschfeld, Die ritterlichen Provinzialstatthalter : Sitstingsbcrichte dcr k. pr. Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin, 1889, 425 sqq. Raetia and Noricum. The Via Claudia Augusta. 33. C /. L. V. 8002. Milestone belonging to the restoration by Claudius in a. d. 47 of the Via Claudia Augusta (previously Via Augusta) originally made by the elder Drusus after the conquest of Raetia in b. c. 15. Found near Feltre (Feltria), ///. ORGANISATION OF ROME AND ITALY. 41 so that the road probably joined that coming direct from Verona up the valley of the Adige at Tridentum. One other stone has been found near Meran (C /, L. V. 8003), containing the variant a Jliimine Pado ad flunien Dannvium. No milestones of the original Via Augusta have been discovered. For the form I. in 1. II cf. No. 9. TI . CLAVDIVS • DRVSI • F CAESAR • AVG • GERMA NICVS • PONTIFEX • MAXV MVS • TRIBVNICIA • POTESTA 5 TE • Vi • COS • rv • IMP • XI • P • P CENSOR • VIAM • CLAVDIAM AVGVSTAM • QVAM • DRVSVS PATER • ALPIBVS • BELLO • PATE FACTIS • DEREX^RAT • MVNIT • AB 10 ALTINO • VSQVE • AD • FLVMEN DANVVIVM • M • P • CCCi In B.C. 42 Gallia Cisalpina, with its governor and his army, disappeared from the list of provinces. In order therefore that Italy should not be at once the centre of the Empire and yet a part of its frontier, the provinces of Raetia and No- ricum were created between the Alps and the Danube which thus became the frontier of the Empire (No. '^'^. 10). For the conquest see p. 37. The same reasons which had caused the removal of the Proconsul and his army from Cisalpine Gaul, made it unadvisable to create a province of the first rank here, and therefore governors essentially of the same class as those of the western Alps {prociiratores), the differ- ence being one of degree and not of kind, were placed in charge of the two districts and of the troops which defended them. These were of the second class, supplemented by the local militia. Tac. Hist. i. 6h. 2 : Raeticae alae cohortcsqiie et ipsorum Ractorum iuvcntiis siicta armis et more miliiiae exer- cita (cf p. 40 of the Maritime Alps). But in the course of the second century political reasons had to give way to the necessities of the Empire, and the pressure of the barbarians PART I. -AUG USTUS. on the Upper Danube was met by transferring each province to a legatiis pro prac tore with a legion under his command. The Via Claudia Augusta was important as being the means of communication with the frontier garrisons on the Danube, and also with Augusta Vindelicorum (Augsburg), the chief Roman centre in Raetia (Tac. Germ. 41 : m splendidissiina Raetiae provinciae colonia. Probably as old as the time of Augustus, but only a caput gcntis and not a municipuim, till Hadrian). IV. THE IMPERIAL FAMILY, The arch of Ticinum (No. 34) is the earliest monument in which the idea of a Roman Imperial family can be traced. We are still far from the days of the ' domus divina ' (hardly ever mentioned before the third century), but the appearance of the wife of the Princeps on a public monument marks a new departure, even though she is only called rixor Caesaj^is Au- gtisti, and has as yet no official titles of her own (Agrippina, wife of Claudius, was the first to be called Augusta in the lifetime of her husband : mater castroritm, &c., not before Severus). As Augustus had no direct male descendants, it is an Imperial family produced by a process of selection, and, with one exception (10, the future Emperor Claudius), only those living persons are admitted to a place on this monu- ment who can trace their connection, by adoption or otherwise, with the Emperor's adopted son Tiberius. This is important as establishing a line of succession to the Principate, for, however true it may be that the Constitution of the Prin- cipate contained no provision for a regular succession, the position of Tiberius as Heir Apparent is marked out quite as much by the fact that he is the adopted son of the Princeps as by his possession of the imperiiim and tribtmicia potestas (cf. Tac. Ajui. i. 3. 3: illiic cimcta vtrgere : films, collega imperii, consors tribimiciae potestatis adsumititr. So in Hist. I. 14 the adoption of Piso by Galba is spoken of as e Family lod upon the ti Einsiedlensis TATRI • P| COS • XI ;0 • IVLIO ANICI • F PRONEPOT .MANICO 10. TI • CLAVDIO DRVSI • GERMANICI • F NERONI • GERMANICO S^Toface p. \i. C. I. L. V. 6416, Inscriptio The Family of Augustus, and the Succession. neron: • ivLio GERMANICI /. AVG • PEONErOT CAESAKI urtiso tulio ti. F AVGVSTI • NEPOTI DIVI • PRON • CAESARI PONTIFICI GERMANICO IVXIO • « . F AVGVSTI • NEPOT DIVI • PRON . CAESARI TI • CAESARI AVGVSTI • F DIVI • NEPOT ■ PONT AVGVRIQVE COS ■ (TER ■ IMP ■ TER TRIBVNICIAE ■ POT ■ VIII. IMP • CAESARI DIVI • F • AVGVSTO PONTIFIC ■ MAXIMO PATRI • PATRIAE ■ AVG • XV VIR - S ■ F ■ VII VIR • EPVLON COS ■ XIII • IMP • XVII • TRIBVNIC • POTEST ■ XXX LIVIAI DRVSI • F VXORI • CAESARIS • AVG c ■ CAESARI AVGVSTI • F DIVI ■ NEPOT PONTIFIC ■ COS IMPERATORI / ■ CAESARI AVGVSTI • F DIVI ■ NEPOT AVGVRI ■ COS • DESIGN PRINCIPI ■ IVVENTVTIS DRVSO ■ IVLIO GERMANICI ■ F AVG • PRONEPOT GERMANICO TI ■ CLAVDTO DRVSI ■ GERMANICI • F NERONI • GERMANICO IV. THE IMPERIAL FAMILY. 43 coviitia imperii). Beyond Tiberius there are no positive indications of the order of succession, for after securing an immediate successor Augustus was only concerned with the continued existence of the Julian family (cf. Tac. Ann. i. 3. 5 : qno phiribns muninicntis insista-ct). It is not clear why Tiberius Claudius Nero (10) has a place in the series, for he was not, like his brother Germanicus, adopted by Tiberius. The monument represents in the main the results of the settlement of the succession in a. d. 4. But the presence of the names of the two sons of Julia and Agrippa, Gains and Lucius Caesar, reminds us that this was only a second settlement and that the first choice of Augustus had marked out his nearest male blood-relations as his suc- cessors. After their deaths (in A. D. 4 and A. D. 2 respectively) the only surviving members of that family were Agrippa Postumus and his two sisters ; but even under the settlement of A. D. 4 when the representatives of the Claudian family took the first place, Augustus endeavoured to secure a share in the succession for his own grandchildren, first by adopting Agrippa as well as Tiberius, and then, after the rejection and seclusion of the former (before the date of this monument : hence he does not appear), by marrying Agrippina to Ger- manicus (a. D. 5). Accordingly in the persons of their sons Nero (i) and Drusus (9), Augustus once more secured the presence of male representatives of his own family in the line of succession, and a certain amount of attention even seems to be called to this by the omission of Tiberius among their ascendants. In the person of their brother the Emperor Gains Caesar (not born till A.D, 12) this mixed Julio-Claudian family secured the position intended for it by Augustus, nor did its political importance end with him, for certainly one of the reasons why Nero, the son of the younger Agrippina, was able to oust the son of Claudius wath such ease, was the fact that he was a descendant of the founder of the Principate. ^'V/Vs- IV. THE IMPERIAL FAMILY. 43 coinitia imperii). Beyond Tiberius there are no positive indications of the order of succession, for after securing an immediate successor Augustus was only concerned with the continued existence of the Julian family (cf. Tac. Ann. i. 3. 5 : quo plw'ibns umnimcntis insistcrct). It is not clear why Tiberius Claudius Nero (lo) has a place in the series, for he was not, like his brother Germanicus, adopted by Tiberius. The monument represents in the main the results of the settlement of the succession in a. d. 4. But the presence of the names of the two sons of Julia and Agrippa, Gains and Lucius Caesar, reminds us that this was only a second settlement and that the first choice of Augustus had marked out his nearest male blood-relations as his suc- cessors. After their deaths (in A. D. 4 and A. D. 2 respectively) the only surviving members of that family were Agrippa Postumus and his two sisters ; but even under the settlement of A. D. 4 when the representatives of the Claudian family took the first place, Augustus endeavoured to secure a share in the succession for his own grandchildren, first by adopting Agrippa as well as Tiberius, and then, after the rejection and seclusion of the former (before the date of this monument : hence he does not appear), by marrying Agrippina to Ger- manicus (a. D. 5). Accordingly in the persons of their sons Nero (i) and Drusus (9), Augustus once more secured the presence of male representatives of his own family in the line of succession, and a certain amount of attention even seems to be called to this by the omission of Tiberius among their ascendants. In. the person of their brother the Emperor Gains Caesar (not born till A.D. 12) this mixed Julio-Claudian family secured the position intended for it by Augustus, nor did its political importance end with him, for certainly one of the reasons why Nero, the son of the younger Agrippina, was able to oust the son of Claudius with such ease, was the fact that he was a descendant of the founder of the Principate. 44 PART I.— A UG USTUS. The following table shows the actual relationships of the persons mentioned. The figures refer to the order of the inscriptions. The names of Emperors are printed in capitals. Tib. Claudius Nero =;: (6) Livia = (5) Augustus =: Scribonia. I I I I I (4) Tiberius ^ Vipsania Nero Claudius q= Antonia. Julia z:p M. Vipsanius Claudius Nero. Agrippina. Drusus I Agrippa. Germanicus. (2) Drusus (lo)Tiberius (3)Germanicus=FAgTippina. (7) C.Caesar. (8) L.Caesar. Agrippa Juhus Claudius Julius Postumus. Caesar. Nero Caesar. Germanicus. (1) Nero Julius (g) Drusus Julius Gaius Caesar Agrippina = Cn. Domitius Caesar. Germanicus. (Caligula). I Ahenobarbus. Nero Claudius Caesar. V. THE WORSHIP OF THE EMPEROR. The Provincial Concilia and the Worship of Rome and Augustus. 35- C /. L. xii. 6038. Fragment of a bronze tablet found at Narbonne in 1888. Now in the Louvre. The readings and supplements are those of Mommsen and Hirschfeld in the Corpus, except 1. 11 \per tabcir\as instead of [dccurtonels. Mispoulet, Bitll. Critique, Jan. i, 1890. Cf. Hirschfeld, in Sitz. Bcrl. Akad. 1888, 859, note 123. The A is certain. [A^«]rbone \_Jianicii\ [cHvi rem divinam faciet sacrijicah'\\\.o^Q,Y\c\.ox^s \^qtii inagi- stratibtis apparoit, ei apparento\ \scatndwn lege]m. iusque eius provinciae ei in decurionibus senatuve \scntentiae dicendae signaiidique . . . itc7)i\ . . . [inter decuriones j-]enatoresve subsellio primo spectan[^/ ludos publieos eius provinciae ins esto]. .... [nxorJia]m'mls veste alba aut purpurea vestita ([estis diedus^ neve invita iurato neve corpus hominis mor[//// attingito neve] .... r. THE WORSHIP OF THE EMPEROR. 45 . \insi iiecessd\x'\\ hominis erit eique spectaculis publicis eius \provinciac loco . . . mtercsse liceto\ De honoribus eius qui flamen {\tLerii\. 10 \^Si qui flmncn fnc\v\\. advcrsus banc legem nihil fecerit, turn is qui flamen erit c\2irato per dtioviros iit . . .] [per tabeU'\2iS iurati decernant placeatne ci qui flamonio abierit permitti st^ttiam sibi ponere. Cui ita de- er ever in i\ \ius esse sfa\i\\a.c ponendae nomenque suum patrisque et unde sit et quo anno ^?i\inen fiierit inscribendi, ei\ \Narbo'\\'\& intra fines eius templi statuae ponendae ius esto, nisi cui imperator [Caesar Atigustits inter- dixcrit. Eidcin^ [/]n curia sua et concilio provinciae Narbonesis inter sui ordinis secundum le[^^/;/] .... 15 sententiae dicendae signandique ius esto, item spectaculo publico in provincia [edendo inter deciiriones inter- esse prac-'\ textato eisque diebus, quibus, cum flamen esset, sacrificium fecerit, ea veste ^\\.[blice iiti, qtia in eo faciendo nsns est\. Si flamen in civitate esse des[zVr2V]. Si flamen in civitate esse desierit, neque ei subrogatus erit, turn uti quis[<7//^ flamen coloniae (?) Narbone erif] in triduo, quo certior factus erit et poterit, Narbon[^] sacra facito [omniaqne secundum hatic legem per reliquani\ 20 partem eius anni eo ordine habeto, quo annuorum flami- v\iim Jiabeniur eique si ea fecerit per dies i2on tnitius\ XXX, siremps lex ius causaque esto, quae flamini Au- gus[/«/z ex hac lege facto erit]. Quo loco conciliu[;/^ provinciae habendum sit\ Qui in concilium provinciae convenerint '^[arbonem, ibi id habento. Si quid extra Narbonem fincsve Narbone-] 46 PA R T I.— A UG USTUS. slum concilio habito actum erit. id ius r?^\.\tiinque ne esto\. '■5 De pecu[n2a sacris dcstinata\. Qui flamonio abierit, is ex ea pecunia, \_qiiae sacris destinata crit, quod citis siipcrfuerit, statii-^ as imaginesve imperatoris Caes[«;7V Augiisti arbitratu ciiis qui co anno pro-'] vinciae praeerit intra idem \\cnipluni dcdicato . . seqitc omnia sic 2i.t Jiac lege cautnni est de] ea re, fecisse apud eum qui vs.\jiones provinciae pntahit probato] 36. Allmer, Lyon, ii. p. 87. De Boissieu, Inscriptions de Lyon, p. 278. Found at Lyons and now in the Museum there. TIB • POMPEIO POMPEI • IVSTI • FIL PRISCO • CAD VR CO • OMNIBVS • HO 5 NORfe • APVD • SV6S FVNCT • TRIB • LEG • V MACEDONICAE I VDICI • ARC AE G A L L I A R V M • iTl 10 PROvkc • galll4e "^ ^ tf 37- C. 1. L. ii. 4248. On the base of a statue at Tarraco where it was found. Bergidum Flavium mentioned in 1. 2 was probably between Asturica and Lucus Augusti. It was no doubt founded by Vespasian. C • VAL • ARABINO FLAVIANI • F • BERGDO • F OMNIB • HON • IN RE • P SVA • FVNC • SACERDOTI 5 ROMAE • ET • AVG • P • H • C OB • CVRAM • TABVLARI V. THE WORSHIP OF THE EMPEROR. 47 CENSVALIS FIDELITER ADMINISTR • STATVAM INTER • FLAMINALES TO VIROS • rOSITAM • EX ORNANDVM . VNIVERS CENSVER C. Val{eri6) Arabino Flaviani f., Ecrgido /{/at'/n/si), onini- b[us) /ioji{orib?is) in re p[iiblica) S2ia ftinc{to), saccrdoti Roinae et Ang{jisti) p[rovinciae) H{ispaniae) c{itcrioris)^ ob cm-am tabular i censnalis fidelitcr adi7imistr[atai)i) statnani inter flaniinalcs viros cxornand\_a\in nnivers{i) censncr[nnt). No. "i^^ is the only document of any length that we possess relating to the Concilia with their presidents the priests of Augustus, which were organised in every province for the worship of the Emperor. Although this is a special statute for Gallia Narbonensis, it may be regarded as typical of the form taken in the West by an institution which was common to the whole Empire. Everywhere the political reason for its existence was applicable, viz. the necessity of creating in a State which had neither monarchical traditions nor national unity, a feeling of loyalty to the Emperor, and a sense of membership in the Empire. Everywhere too we find the same fundamental organisation, viz. an assembly of deputies (oT^yeS/aot, legati) elected by the communities of the province meeting annually at a central temple of Rome and Augustus under the presidency of an elected high-priest {apyj.epev^, sacerdos, flavien provinciac). But the starting-point for the system was found in the Hellenised East, which was familiar with the worship of Alexander and his successors, and where in Republican times the Greek cities had been accustomed to erect temples not only to the city of Rome, as Smyrna had done so early as B.C. 195 (Tac. Ann. 4. ^6)., but also to Roman generals and governors (Plut. Flainifiinns, ]6: at Chalcis ert he koX KaO' ijiJ.a.'i Upevs x.€tpo7oz-7jros airebeLKvvTu Tltov. 48 PART I.— A UG USTUS. Cf. Cic. ad Q. f. I. I. 9. 26), It was quite natural therefore that the object of the new State-cult should be defined as Roma et Augustus (Suet. Aug. 52 : templa, quanivis sciret etiam pi'oconsulibiis deceriii solere, in nulla tamen provincia nisi communi suo Romaeqtie nomine recepit). As it was im- portant that the worship should be general, an organisation was wanted which should unite all the communities of a province in its practice. Here again it was in the Greek part of the Empire that the principle of such an organisation was found, for several of the old national representative con- gresses (koii^cx, (jvvihpia) survived the Roman Conquest ; and though it is not clear how far, if at all, there was in any case actual continuity between them and the Imperial assemblies, they certainly provided the pattern on which the latter were modelled. (Pausanias, 7. 16. 10: krpaiiovTo is iXeov 'Pw/xaioi r?/s 'EAAaSos Kal avvibpia Kara edvos anohihoaa-iv kKcicTTOLS to. apxoua- For the federal assembly of Lycia under Augustus see Strabo, 14. 3. 2, p. 664 ; conimuue Siciliae, Cic. Verr. 2. 2.46. 114 ; Koivhv rSiv 'A\aiG)v, Mommsen, Prov. i. 264. Asia on the other hand probably never had a koivov before Au- gustus. Waddington, iii. p. 245.) The system was inaugur- ated in Asia and Bithynia in B.C. 29. Dio Cass. ^i. 20. 7: Tol'i 8e 87) pivots, "YiX\i]vas (T(})as eirtKaXiaas, kavT<^ nva, rot? }ikv 'Acrtat'ots kv ITepyajua) rois 8e ^lOvvdls iv NtK0//7jSeia, TejjLevLcrai iTtirpt'^i. Kal TovT kKildev ap^afxevov Kac kir aXXcov avroKpa- Topcov ov jjiovov kv Tois 'EXkriviKols (Ovecnv, aXka kol kv rois aAAois oaa ToJv 'Pcoptaiooy aKoveL, iyh'eTo. The earliest evidence for the Concilium in Asia is the coin of B.C. 19, with Com[mu?ie) As[iae) Rom{ae) ct August[o) (Cohen, i. p. 75, No. 86. Eckhel, vi. 100). In every province, including those which were added to the Em- pire at a later date (e.g. Britain, Tac^/i?;/. 14. 31. 6, and Dacia), this pattern was reproduced. In the West the earliest certain case is the altar to Rome and Augustus dedicated in B.C. 12 at Lugudunum as a centre for the Three Gauls (Nos. 16, 17) and here, as in the East, the new institution seems to have V. THE WORSHIP OF THE EMPEROR. 49 been adapted to a pre-existing national institution, for Aug. 1, the day of the dedication of the altar (Suet. CI. 2) and of the meeting of the Concilium, was also the great Celtic festival of the Sun-god Lug (Prof. Rh>^s, Hibbert Lectures, 409, 421, 424). We know nothing about the date of the foundation of the altar or temple with its Concilium for Narbonensis, but it must belong to the time of Augustus. When Germany- was lost in A. D. 9 an altar had been set up at the oppidiim Ubioriim (Koln) as a centre for the province, just as the altar at Lugudunum was a centre for the Gauls (Tac. Ann. i. 57. 2). At Tarraco, where an altar had existed under Augustus, a temple was erected in A. D. 15 (Tac. Ann. 4. 37). Finally we learn from C. 1. L. iii. 2810 = W. 2456 that there was an ara Angus ti Libnrniae probably at Scardona. Together with the common fundamental organisation of the Concilia there were considerable varieties of detail cor- responding to different conditions in East and West, and in considering No. 35 some of the more important of these may be noticed by way of contrast. From the first section of the fragment, which deals with the duties and privileges of the priest and his wife, it is clear that in the West the priesthood was essentially Roman in character and modelled on \.\\q Jlamonium Diale. (Contrast with this the characteristic development of the Asiarchs, &:c., in the Hellenistic part of the Empire. Mommsen, Prov. i. 345.) Like the flamen Dialis, the priest of Rome and Au- gustus is attended on public occasions by a lictor (1. 2), he has a seat and a vote in the local senate (1. 4), his official dress is the praefexia (1. 16. For the last two points in the case of th&Jlainen Dialis cf. Liv. 27. 8. 7), and from the frag- ment relating to the priestess (6-8), who corresponds to the flaminica Dialis, it may be inferred that the traditional rules of conduct which bound the priest of Jupiter applied to him also (1. 7, cf. Gellius, 10. 15. 5 : inrare Dialem fas nunquam est . . . mortuuni nunquam attingit . . . caedevi fermc cacrimoniae E 50 PART I.— A UG US TUS. simt, flaminicae Dialis). For the special permission to the priestess to be present at spectacles cf. Suet. Aug. 44: feminis ne gladiatores qiiidem . . . nisi ex stiperiore loco spec- tare concessit. Solnm vii'ginibns Vestalibtis locum in theatro . . . dedit. The ins signandi of 1. 15 probably refers to some method of voting by ballot {^per tabellani scilicet signatam. Momm- sen, C. I. L. xii. p. 864*), and with \^per tabelf\as inrati in 1. II is illustrated by the method of voting in the koivov Qea- ]ellatus est. Supplicatio Felicitati Imperi. May 12. \J^^^ ^^- Mai. CO die aedes Martis dedicatast. Supplicci\\\o Molibus Martis. May 24. [ Vim K. Inn. natalis Germanici Caesaris. ^^////Jlicatio Vestae. July 12. [Ill I Id. lid. natalis divi hdi. Siipplicatio Ioz'\\, Md^rix Ultori, Veneri \_Ge}ietrici\ Suppiijcatio lovi 1. I. Aug. 19 is the New Years Daj'. The beginning of the inscription has been lost, but except the Consulship, there is no event in the life of Augustus, falling between July 12 and Aug. 19, of sufficient importance to occupy the position. The capture of Alexandria occurred on Aug. i [C. I. L. i. p. 398), but it is unlikely that that was commemorated here when the victory of Actium was passed over. Tacitus then is only adopting the view of Augustus himself as to the starting-point of his official career, when he says of his death on Aug. 19, Ami. 1.9: idem dies accepti quondam imperii princeps et vitae supremiis. 1. 2. The day is supplied from the entry in the Fasti Amiternini for Sept. 3 (C /. L. i. p. 324) : Fer^iae) et supplicationes aput omnia ptdvinaria quod eo die Caes'ar , divi f. vicit in Sicilia. The only victory of Augustus commemorated. It is apparently selected because the defeat of Sextus Pompeius and the fall of Lepidus restored peace to South Italy. V. THE WORSHIP OF THE EMPEROR. 53 1. 3. The only iminolatio in the Calendar, marking out Augustus as the central object of the worship. 1. 4. Drusus, son of Tiberius. The Supplicalio Vesfae on the birthdays of members of the family of Augustus is explained by the Emperor's connection with her as Pontifex Maximus, and the presence of a temple to her within the Palatium. Ovid, 71/^/. 15. 864: Vesiaque Caesareos inter sacrata penates. /as/. 4. 949: cognati Vesta recepta est limine. Dio Cass. 54. 27. 3. C.I. L. i. p. 392 (Apr. 28). 1. 7. Mon. Anc. 2. 29 : [Aram Fotiunae reduci itixta ac]dcs Honoris et Virtutis ad portam [Capenam pro reditu nieo se'\natus consecravit, B.C. 19. For other references see Mommsen, Res Gest. 46. 1. g. Lex Arae Narbonensis (C. /. L. xii. 4333, Bruns, Pontes, p. 242) 25 : VIJ quoqitie] Idus lantiar. qua die prinium imperium orbis terranim auspicatus est. Cic. Phil. II. 8. 20: C. Caesari . . .fasces senatus dedit. Tac. Ann. i. 10: uht decreto pat rum fasces et ius practoris invaserit. Cf. Mon. Anc. i. 3. 1. 10. Mon. Anc. 6. 16: (on the restitutio reipublicae in b. c. 28-27) ?^^ P''^ merito nieo senatu\s consulto Augiustui) appe\llatus sum. 1. II. B. c. 13. Mon. Anc. 2. 37: \cii\yn e.x H\ispa?^nia Gal\Jiaque, rebus in his p\rovincis prosp\e\re \gesi\i^s\ R[omam redi] Ti. Ne]j-\one P. Qm\_ntilio con- sulibu]s, aram [Pads A]u[g']ust[ae senatus pro'] redi[t\u nieo co\jisecrari censuif] ad cant\_pum Martiuni]. For custodis, Sec. cf. C. I. L. xi. 1421. 8= W. 883, II. 13 {Ccnotaphia Pisana) where Augustus is described as custodis imperi Romani iotiusque orbis terraruni praesidis. 1. 13. B.C. 12. Cf. Mon. Anc. 2. 25. Dio Cass. 54. 27. 2. C. I. L. i. p. 387, and V. sup. 1. 4. 1. 14. Ovid, Fast. 4. 627 : (April 14) hac Mutinensia Caesar grandine militia contudii arma sua. Dio Cass. 46. 37. 3 : (^ P^vtwvios) tov OviPiov irXrjffid^ovTa alaOofifvos, irpoaePaXe npos to epv/xaTwv avTi/ca9effTi]K6Tajv (Octavianus and Hirtius ,, et iroiy irpoe^eXwv avrb paov tov Komov iro\tp.T](Tei(v. 1. 15. During the battle at Forum Gallorum (Cic. ad Fam. 10. 30) the camp of Octavianus was attacked by L. Antonius, as his brother had directed (Dio Cass. 46. 37. 4). For the results of the fighting on April 15 cf. Cic. Phd. 14. 10. 28 : (C. Caesar) castra multarum legionum paucis cohoriibus tutatus est, secundum- que proclium fecit. Ita triuni iniperatoruni virtute consilio felicitate uno die locis pluribus res publica est conservata. Dio Cass. 46. 38 : avTOKparopfs ov /xoiov u "IpTios dWd Hal b Ov'tl3ios Kainep Kaicais diraWd^as, o re Kaic^ap Kairoi fi-qSe ^axtad- fiivos, Kol into rSjv ar paTLOJTwv Koi viro ttjs ffovKfjs wvoixd(j6r](Tav. I. 16. The reference to Mars suggests May 12, when there were litdi at Rome to commemorate the dedication of the temple of Mars Ultor on the Capitol in B. c. 20. C. I. L. i. p. 393. The only other reference to Moles Martts is in the catalogue of goddesses given by Gellius (13. 23) as invoked in libris sacerdotuut populi Romani et in plerisque antiquis orationibus .... Moles Martis. 1. 17. The supplicatio Vestae shows that the commemoration is for the birth- day of a member of the Imperial family. That of Germanicus is known from the Acta Fratrum Arvalium for a. d. 38. C. I. L. vi. 2028c 29, p. 468. Henzen, P-52. 54 PART I.— A UG USTUS. 39. C. I. L. X.887, 888, 890. Three of a number of inscriptions (C /. L. x.p. 109 sqq.) from Pompeii, now in the Naples Museum, recording dedications made annually by the Ministri Mercurii Maiae (later Ministri Augusti), extending froni B. c. 25 to A. D. 40. The date of No. 41 is b. c. 2. Nothing is known of the officials mentioned in No. 41. 9-11 as joining in the authorisation given by the chief magistrates of the town. The interpretation of 1. 11 is that suggested by Mommsen in C. I. L. x. p. 109. It is very rare to find the praenomen following the noinen, as in Nos. 39 and 41. IIO-SITTI-M-S- S • S OR N • T • S "A • VOLVSI • T • S • mitiistK I • MERC • MAI 5 J-ACR • IVSSV II • CE L E R I S Sitti Miarci) s[erznis), Soni{t) T{iti) s[ervus), Volusi T(iti) s{ervtis), \immsi\ri Merc{tiri) Mai{ae), \ii\acriitni) iussn Celeris . . . 40. GRATVS • ARRI MESSIVS • ARRIVS INVENTVS MEMOR • ISTACID 5 miN ' AVG • MERC • MAI ^;tr D • D • IVSSV MARCEL Grains Arri {servus), Messiiis Arrius Inventus, Mentor Istacid{i) {serviis), \ini\n{isirt) Ang{iisti) Merc{nri) Mai{ae), [ex] d[ecreto) d{eciirionum) iussu Marcelili) .... 41. A • VEIVS • PHYLAX N • POPIDIVS • MOSCHVs T • MESCINIVS • AMPHIO V. THE WORSHIP OF THE EMPEROR. 55 PRIMVS • ARRVNTI • M • S • 5 MIN • AVG • EX • D • D • IVSSV M • HOLCONI • RVFI • Iv A • CLODI • FLACCI • ITT D • V • I • D • P • CAESETI • POSTVMI 10 N • TINTIRI • RVFI ^V-V-A-S-P-P imp. r^^SARE • XIII • .1 .- • CCS m. plantio j-zLVANO . A[uIhs) Veins Phylax, N [timer ins) Popidius Mosckus, T{itns) Mescinins Amphio, Primus Arrnnti M[arci) s{crvus), min[isiri) Aug{?isti) ex d[ecrei6) d[ectirionuni) inssn M{arei) Holconi Rnfi IV, A{u/i) Clodi Flacci III, dijnnii) v{irornni) i{ure) d[iciindo), P{ubli) Caeseti Postumi, N[nmeri) Tintiri Rufi, \d[mmi)\ v[iroriim) v[otis) A{itgustalibiis) s[acris) p{nblice) p{rociirandis), \Imp{eratore) Cac'jsare XIII \_M{arcd) Plautio Si\lvano co{n)s[itlib2ts). 42. C. I. L. X. 820. At Pompeii in the temple of Fortune. M • TVLLIVS -M-F-D-V-I-D- TER • QVINQ • AVGVR • TR • MIL A • POP • AEDEM • FORTVN AE • A VGVST • SOLO • ET • PEQ • S VA M. Tnllins M. f., d[jmm) v{ir) i{nre) d{icundo) tcr, qnin- g[jienualis), augur, tr{ibuuus) mil{itum) a pop[ttlo), acdem Fortunae August[ae) solo et peq{tinia) sua. C. I. L. X. 837. On the pedestal of a statue erected in the large theatre at Pompeii. Now in the Naples Museum. The date is fixed by No. 41 to b. c. a. M • HOLCONIO • RVFO • D • V • I • D • IIII • QVINQ TrIB • MIL • A • POPVLO • AVGVSTi • SACERDOTi EX • D • D • M. Holconio Rufo, d{uum) v{iro) i[ure) d[ieundo) IIII quin- 56 PART I.— A UG USTUS. q{7icnnali), trib{n)io) inil[iUtin) a popjilo, Augnsti saccrdoti, ex d[cci'cto) diccuriommi). 44. C. /. L. X. 1613. Formerly on the frieze of the Temple of Augustus at Puteoli. The last words are d{e) s{iio) f[ecit). I • tALPVRNIVS • L • F • TEMPLVM • AVGVSTO • CVM • ornamentIs • D • S • F The historians, from Tacitus onwards, are either silent about a worship of Augustus in Italy, or else imply that it was forbidden. Dio Cassius for instance, after describing the inauguration of the provincial worship in Asia and Bithy- nia and its extension to the rest of the Empire (51. 20. 7, quoted on p. 48), continues, ey yap rot rw acrret atrw rfj re olKXt] ^IraXia ovk eariv oorts tQv {avTOKpaTopcav) koX k(p' oiroaovovv Xoyov TLvbs a^LU)V eTokpirjcrc tovto TTOujcrai, (cf Tac. Ami. 1. lO. 5 j Suet. Atig. 52). The evidence, however, of contemporary inscriptions shows that there existed in Italy a worship of Augustus in his lifetime, of local origin and unequal dis- tribution, but more direct and personal than the organised devotion of the provinces. The statement of Dio is perfectly true if taken of the contrast between Augustus and all the other Emperors, and not as applying to him among the rest, for, with the exception of a few instances of a worship of Tiberius (C. I. L. ix. 652, x. 688, iv. 11 80?), Augustus stands alone among the Emperors as the recipient of divine honours in his lifetime in Italy. The worship is local, for while all Italy welcomed the rule of Augustus, there were places and persons whose loyalty had not risen to the point of giving him divine honours, and in some cases there might be posi- tive opposition to such an innovation (cf. Tac. Ann. i. 10. 5). On the other hand where an individual or a community was in some special relation to Augustus, or was less subject to conservative Roman prejudices, a favourable soil was provided. V. THE WORSHIP OF THE EMPEROR. 57 Apparently this was peculiarly the case in Campania, with its settlements of the veterans of Augustus (p. 34), and the Greek element in its towns. For the latter point Pompeii is typical. Yet even here we see the cult beginning in in- direct and tentative forms, and only gradually becoming more direct and outspoken, (i) In B. c. 25 we find in exist- ence a colleghim of worshippers of Mercurius and Maia (No. 39). Later (No. 40 is undated) Augustus is associated with them (the connection is illustrated by Hor. i C. 1. 41), and in B.C. 3 he has displaced the other divinities and appears alone (No. 41). (2) A temple of Fortuna Augusta was erected by a private individual on the site of a private house (see the plan of Pompeii e. g. in Overbeck, and compare with the position of the official temples in the Forum). The dedi- catory inscription (No. 42) was withdrawn from public view by being inscribed, not in the regular place, on the epistyle facing the street, but within the cella above the niche where the image stood (for other indications see Nissen 1. c. infr.). The date of the foundation is unknown, but in A. D. 3 a collegmin of ministri was instituted in connection with the temple {C. I. L. x. 824). (3) Any reserve which may be inferred from the evidence just given had become unnecessary by B. c. 2 when, as No. 43 shows, a public devotion to Au- gustus was in existence, and its priesthood recognised as practically part of the local atrstts hoiioriun, and filled by one of the leading men of the place. We have no evidence of any such process of development in the case of the temple of Augustus erected by a private founder at Puteoli (No. 44). The high water mark of Cam- panian devotion was reached at Cumae, where, as we learn from the document known as the ' Feriale Cumanum ' (No. 3(S), there was a temple of Augustus, the worship of which was organised on the basis of a special sacred year, all the holy days of which commemorated events in the life of Augustus, or the birthdays of members of his family. 5 « PART I.- A UG US TUS. The following is a list of the places in Italy in addition to those mentioned above, where there is evidence for a worship of Augustus. In nearly every case, as O. Hirschfeld has shown {Kaiscrculttis, Sitzimgsbcr. der Berlin. Akad. 1 888, 838), some connection can be proved between Augustus and the community. Asisium (Henzen, 5994 : flamen Aug. paren- tis sc. coloniae), Beneventum {C. I. L. ix. 1556: Caesareum Imp. Caesari Augusto et coloniae Beneventanae), Fanum Fortunae (Vitruvius, 5. i. 7: aedes Angtisti), Pisa {C. /. L. xi. 1420= W. 883: Augusteuin, 1421. 43= W. 883. ii. ^\: flamen Augustalis), Tibur (or perhaps Tuder, C/.Z.xiv. ^^9'^: flamen Angtist{alis)), Verona {C. I. L. v. 3341 : flam{ini) Atig{nsti) primo Veron{ae) creato. Cf. 3376, 3936), an unidentified town of Latium {C. I. L. xiv. 3500 : flamen AiignstaSjis^), and possibly Ancona {C. I. L. ix. 5904: \sacerdoti An'\g[nsti) Victoriae Caesaris. Ci.C.LL. ^' P- 397- ^^^^i Victoriae Caesaris). The arannminis Ajigusti at Forum Clodii, the worship of which is regulated by decrees of A. D. 18 {^C. I. L. xi. 3303 = W. 884), seems to have been in existence for some time, and probably dates from the life- time of Augustus (1. c. 4 : victimae natali A?/g. VIII K. Octobr. duae qnae p{er)p{etno) inmolari adsiietae sunt). Mommsen, das Augustische Festverzetchniss von Cumae. Hermes, xvii. (1882), 631. Nissen, Pontpeianische Studieti, 183. The Vicomagistri and the Worship of the Lares Augusti at Rome. 45. C. I. L. vi. 448. On an altar from Rome, now at Florence. Parts of the inscription are preserved by copies made when it was in a more perfect -state. (a) is on the front of the altar with three figures (two male, one female) apparently engaged in sacrifice, [bi) is on the right face of the altar with a representation of the two Lares of the ordinary type. The date is B.C. 2. In 1. 2 3 = Gaia which is always used in describing a freedman who has been manumitted by a woman. The line reads thus : D{ecimns) Oppitis {niidieris) F. THE WORSHIP OF THE EMPEROR. 59 l(tbertus) laso, De(amus) Ltuilms D'ecinii) l{ibertus) Salvms, L. Brinnhis {mult- en's) l{ibertits) Princeps, L. Fttrius L. rjbertHs) Salvms, mag{istyt) vici Sandaliari. {a) IMP . CAESARE AVGVSTO XIII M • PLAVTIO SILVAN COS • D OPPIVS • 3 • L . IAS6 • D • LVCILIVS • D • L • SALVIVS • L • BRINNIVS • 3 • L ■ PRINCEPS • L . FVRIVS • L • L . SALVIVS MAG • VICI • SANDALIARI {b) LARIBVS • AVGVSTIS Augustus did not consider it advisable to initiate or permit a direct worship of himself in the capital (Suet. Aug. 52 : in nrbe pertitiacissime absH?mii hoc honore). But as it was important that the lower classes there, no less than the wealthy freedmen and the upper ranks of the provincials, should be made familiar with the ideas of which the Imperial cult was the symbol, when Augustus in B.C. 13-7 {C.I. L. vi. p. 86) restored and remodelled the old organisation of the vims for purposes of local government in Rome (the vicomagistri), he at the same time reconstituted the old worship round which that organisation had centred, in such a way that it should serve the same purpose as the forms of the Imperial cult outside Rome. Henceforward the I arcs compitalcs, the protecting deities of the vicus, honoured at its centre the compitum (Jordan, Topographic der Stadt Rom. '• 534' "• S'^S?)' Hence Plin. H. N. 3. 66: rcgiones XIV coin- pita lariiim CCLXV, meaning the 265 vici of Augustus), are replaced by the Lares Angnsti, and_ with them the Gciiins Augiisti is associated. The following is the most probable account of the history and meaning of this transformation. Originally we find a pair of Lares protecting the viciis, and a single Lar protecting the house {Lar familiaris or domcsticns). By the time of Cicero the Lar of the house was replaced by a pair of Lares 6o PART I.— A UG US TUS. (e.g. Cic. de Donio, 41. 108, &c.) represented like those of the vicus or compihim. For the identity of representation cf. Naevius, ap. Fcst. p. 230 = Merry, Fragments, p. 24 : Theo- dotwn compiles qui avis Compitalibiis . . . Lares liidentis pinxit, and the common representations in houses at Pompeii of the Lares with elevated drinking-horn ^x^A patera or sittda, which are precisely similar to those of the Lares compitales in the streets. Helbig, Wandgemdlde, p. 13, and compare Jig. 1888 article Compittmi in Daremberg and Saglio, Diet. Ant.., with the ordinary type oi Lares domestici, e.g. Baumeister, Denkmdler, p. 811. With these other deities were commonly associated but still more regularly the Genius (Helbig gives fifteen cases of the Lares and Genius at Pompeii as against six cases of the Lares alone. Wandg. pp. 12 and 14, and cf. list with additional instance in the Annali, 1872, p. 32), and there was a tendency to identify the latter with the paterfamilias for the time being, i. e. the representation of the Genius took the form of a portrait. (Instances in Helbig, e.g. p. 11. 31 : ' der trefiflich erhaltene Kopf des Genius zeigt den romischen Por- traittypus des ersten Kaiserzeit.') If we suppose that the house of Augustus had its Lares {domus) Atignsti, with whom the Genius Angnsti would be associated, it would not be unnatural that the restoration of the Lares compitales with the objects stated above should take the form of identifying them with the Lares domestici of the author of the restored worship and of the organisation connected with it ; while the practice of joining the Genius with the Lares will account for the association of the Genius Atignsti. (Ovid, Fast. 5. 145 : mille Lares Getiinmgue diicis qui tradidit illos Urbs habet et vici numina trina colunt.) Such a step was made easier by (1) the identity of representation between the Lares compitales and the Lares domestici^ and (2) the practice of worshipping Augustus or his Genius under the form of a portrait, in private oratories (Hor. 4 C. 5. 34 : Laribus tnnm miscet nnmen\ V. THE WORSHIP OF THE EMPEROR. 6i It is not, however, clear that the Genius Aiigiisti was at first officially united with the Lares Augiisti or Compitales as they are henceforward indififerently called (cf. Suet. Aug. 31). Ovid (1. c.) is the only writer who refers to the mimina trina, whereas Suetonius, &c., mention simply the Lares, and the regular type of dedication under the early Empire is Laribiis Augustis (e. g. No. 45. The only exception is C. I. L. vi. 445 [b. c. 7], G\enio Caesarii\vi, which Jordan ( Vesta und die Laren, 15) restored thus : Laribus Aiigusti G\_cnio Caesaris\ The presence of the Genius Augusti is perhaps implied in one or two other cases, e.g. C. I. L. vi. 448, B2dl. Comunaley 1888, 327) as contrasted with Laribus Augustis et Geniis Caesarum [Gejiio Impcratoris) from the end of the first century onwards {C. I. L. vi. 449-452. Eph. Epigr. iv. 746, 747)- For the institution of the 7nagistri cf. Suet. Aug. 30 : spa- iium urbis in regiones vicosque divisit instituitque ut . . . Jios magistri e plebe cttiusque viciniae lecti {tuerentur). Dio Cass. ^S' ^' 7 ^' C- 7) • *^^^ (TipLcn Koi 77] ecrOrJTi rfj ap-y^iKrj koX pa(3bov- )(0t? bvo €v aiiTols rots ^(copiots (av av ap)(Oi(Jiv, 7//xepats rtcrt xpricrOai khoOr], i] re bovXeia ?/ rots ayopavopois t(ov ejotTTtTrpa/xeVcoi' €V(Ka (Tvvova-a iireTpdiTri. As we see from No. 45 they were generally freedmen. They are mentioned by Dio apparently in con- nection with the precautions against fire, and perhaps the administration of the vici of Rome was at first entrusted to them (the references to the vici are few, e. g. Suet. Aug. 40 : popidi recensuui vicatim egit. 43 : fecit nonmmquam vica- tim \ludos'\), but after the establishment of the pracfectiira vigilum in A. D. 6 (Dio Cass. SS- 26. 4) and the centralisation of authority at Rome in the later years of Augustus in the hands of \.\\q praefectus urbis with the coJiortes Jirbanae at his disposal (cf. Tac. Ann. 6. 10. 5, Hist. 3. 64), they practically disappear except for religious purposes. They are men- tioned Suet. Tib. 'j6 : dcdit et legata plerisque . . . atque ctiavi separatim vicoruni magistris ; but cf Claud. 18: (during a 6a PART I.— A UG USTUS. great fire) dejiciente miliium ac familiaricm iurba, auxilio plebem per ntagistratus ex oninibiis vicis convocavit. The identification of the Lares Angnsti with the Lares (/o;«fs//a of Augustus was originally suggested by Reifferscheid, Aitnali deW Instituto, 1863, 121, esp. 133. It was accepted with modifications by Jordan, Vesta und die Laren, 15 ; Annali, 1872, 28 sqq. The Augustales. 46. C. I. L. ii. 1944. From Suel in Baetica. 1. 6 : d{ecttyionum) d{ecreto). 1. 9 : d{e) s{ua) p{ecunia) d{edit) d{edicavit). NEPTVNO • AVG S AC RVM L • IVNIVS • PVTEOLANVS VI • VIR • AVGVSTALIS 5 IN MVNICIPIO • SVELITANO D • D • PRIMVS • ET • PERPETVVS OMNIBVS • HONORIBVS • QVOS LIBERTINI • GERERE • POTVERViT HONORATVS • EPVLO • D ATO • D • S • P • D • D 47- C. L L. X. 4792. At Tiano (Teanum Sidicinum). 1. 3 : H. S. sexagiiita niillia. S • C • BALNEVM • CLODIANVM EMPTVM • CVM • SVIS • AEDIFICIS EX • PECVNIA • AVGVSTAL • 4^S-- ^4^^ Q MINVCI I K A R I c AVFILLI S V A V I S c AISCIDI L E P T I S N H E R E N N I OPT ATI M • CAEDI C H I L N I S M • VINI F A VSTI V. THE WORSHIP OF THE EMPEROR. 63 48. C. I. L. V. 6349. Found at Lodi Vecchio (Laus Pompcia) and preserved there. HERC • SAC M MASCARPIVS SYMPHORIO VIVIR . SEN 5 ET • AVG • C • D • D ORNAM • DEC AB ORD SPLENDID M M HONOR C\M MASCARPIO 10 FESTO • FILIO EQ • R EQ • P VI • VIR • IVN • DEC VOT • SOL Herc{tili) sac{rutn). M . Mascarpius Symphorio VIvir scH{ior) ct Ang[nstalis) c{reahis) d[ecn7'iomim) d[ecreto), ornain[entis) deciiirionalibiis) ab ord[ine) splendid{issim6) iu{7micipum) M{ediolaniensiw)i) honoi\atus), emu Mascarpio Festo filio, eq{iiiie) R{omand) eq{iw) p[tiblico), VIvir{o) htn{iorc)^ de- c{urione), vot{itm) sol{yit). In the Provincial Concilia and the Magistri Vicorum at Rome we have had two illustrations of the policy of Augustus in providing classes exckided from the higher ranks of pubHc Hfe with spheres of administrative activity by means of or- ganisations which at the same time bound them to the worship of the Emperor and the Imperial system. It is the same idea which underlies the institution of the Augustales. As the Concilia affected the upper class of provincials, and the worship of the Lares Augusti, the lower orders of the capital, so the Augiistalium ordo gave a kind of official status to the principal class which was excluded from municipal honours in the towns of Italy and the (Latin) provinces, the freed men. 64 PART I.— A UG USTUS. There is no direct evidence that Augustus founded the institution, but there can be little doubt th^t it is due to him, for the earliest instances belong to his time (cf. C. I. L. xi. 3805 inf, AWmQX, Lyofi, ii. p. 376), and its general diffusion in the West (with the exception of Africa) points to some action by the Imperial government. With certain local varieties of detail the same general features are found everywhere. Six persons {sexvirt, sevii^i) nearly always freedmen, are annually nominated by the municipal Senate to superintend the worship of the Emperor. After their year of office they pass into the ordo, the general name for the members of which was Augiistales. The fact that the primary intention of the whole institution was the worship of the Emperor, is illustrated by (7./. Z. x. 1877 (from Puteoli of a.d. 176) : D{is) M{anibiis). Q. Insteio Diadtimeno, AngJistali, coluit annis XX XX V, &-'c. The normal usage as to title is that given above, but there is considerable local variation. Thus in South Italy, Atcgustalis, the general descriptive title of the whole organ- isation, is used of the seviri as well as of the members of the ordo (No. 47, where it will be observed that each sevir con- tributes HS 10,000 to the total), whereas in Gaul the converse is the case, i. e. the particular title of the annual officials is retained after office just as in the fuller form sevir [et) Aiigiis- talis. It is probable that at first admission into the ordo after the year of office was a special privilege conferred by the dectiriones, which later became universal, or rather the ordo originated in the practice of allowing some seviri to retain the insignia of their position for life. Hence we get such forms as sevir perpetuus (in Spain, exactly corresponding to Augiistalis pei-peUtus, e.g. at Olisipo C. L L. ii. 196= W. 'JS'^^ vi vir Augiistalis creatus dccrcto decuriommi (at Mediolanum, No. 48, C. I. L. V. 5844), and more commonly sevir et Augiis- talis (esp. in Central and North Italy), which becomes finally sevir Aiignsialis. Such an expression as sex vir et sex vir Au- gustalis [C. I. L. xi. 360= W. 2125) is consequently redundant. V. THE WORSHIP OF THE EMPEROR. 6^ for the seviratus is implied in the last part. The ordo, which is analogous to the eqiiester ordo at Rome, only implies a recognised social rank, and must be distinguished from any- thing of the nature of a corpus or collcgiinn, which occurs only rarely in the case of the Augustales [Aiigtistales corporati). Augustales were sometimes admitted directly into the ordo without having passed through the seviratus. A decree of the Senate of Veii of A.D. 26[C.I. L. xi.38o5= W. 2079) illustrates the sort of grounds on which this was done : placuit . . . ex auctoritate omnium permitti C. lulio divi Augusti l{iberto) Geloti qui omui tempore municipiium) Veios 11071 solum consilio et gratia adiuverit sed etiam impensis suis et per jilium suum celebrari voluerit honorem ei iustissimum decerni ut Atigusta- lium. numero habeatur aeque ac si eo honore usus sit. The Augustalitas was not a stepping-stone to the municipal magistracies, and the highest dignity that an Augustalis could hope for was the ornamenta [aedilicia, duumviralia, decurionalia) conferred by the airia as a special favour. At Mediolanum, however, ingenui as well as liberti obtained the seviratus, and the former after their year of office, during which they were called seviri iuniores, passed on to the muni- cipal honor es and a seat in the curia. The freed men on the other hand, who are spoken of as seviri scfiiores, enter the Augustalium ordo in due course, and attain to nothing higher than the ornamenta. This is illustrated by No. 48, where we have a father belonging to one rank, and the son, in whose generation the taint of servile origin is lost, belonging to the other. (Mommsen in C. I. L. v. p. 6-^^ and note, where evi- dence is given for the existence of a similar arrangement at a few other towns in North Italy.) The Augustalitas not only satisfied the ambition of the freedmen by giving them a limited public career, but at the same time retained in the towns a class which was essential to their material prosperity, and exacted from it as the price of the dignity substantial contributions to the municipal funds F 66 PART I.— A UG USTUS. (the stmima honoraria on admission to the seviratus), as well as the undertaking of public works of ornament or utility (e.g. C. I. L. ix. 808 at Luceria two Augustales pro miincre \yiani\ stia pccunia straverimt), not to speak of largesses and benefactions which were no doubt equally compulsory (e. g. C. I. L. ii. 2100 at Ossigi in Baetica: sacrum Polluci Sex. Quintins Sex. Q{nintii) Successhii lib{ertus) ForiimaUis^ ob honorem VI vir{ahis),ex d{ecreto)ordmis sohita pecunia petente populo donum de sua pecunia data epulo civibus et incolis, et circensibus factis, d[edit) d{cdicavit),) Petronius has left us in his Trimalchio a type of the class of wealthy freedmen who were willing to spend their money freely in the Italian and provincial towns in exchange for the rank and outward distinctions of the Seviraius and Augustalitas (cf esp. Petr. Cena Tr. 71). It seems probable that the origin of the Augustales is to be found in the collegia connected with the worship of Mer- curius, with whom Augustus was associated (cf. p. 57). The two following inscriptions (not later than Augustus) illustrate the earliest stage: C.I. L. iii. 1769 (at Narona) : Aug{usto) sacr{um) C. lulius Macrini lib. Mariialis, I II II I vir miagister) M{ercurialisf), &^c. x. 1272 (at Nola) : I. Sattio L. I. magistro Mercuriali et Augustalei. For other inscriptions of Augustales, see Nos. $'^, 95. J. Schmidt, De Sevtris Angustalibus, Dissert. Halenses, v. pt. i, 1878. O. Hirschfeld, Zeitschr. f. Oesiert. Gyntn. 1878, 289, differs from the views of Schmidt. Friedlaender, Petronius Cena Trimalch. Inirod. 36-40. PART II. FROM THE DEATH OF AUGUSTUS TO THE ACCESSION OF VESPASIAN, A. D. 14-69. I. HISTORY OF THE EMPERORS AND PERSONS CONNECTED WITH THEM. Position of lulia Augusta. 49. C. /. L. ii. 2038. From Antequera (Anticaria in Baetica). The reading of 1. 4 is confirmed by No. 50. Erected between a.d. 14 and 29. IVLIAE • AVG • DRVSI /. DIVZ aug. MATRI • TI • CAESARIS • AVG • PRINCIPIS ET • CONSERVATORIS • ET • DRVSI • GER M A N I C I • G E ^etrici • O R B I S 5 M • CORNELIVS • PROCVLVS PON TVFEX • CAESARVM Cohen, i. p. 169, No. 3, Eckhel, vi. 154. Bronze medallion of the Colonia lulia Romula (Hispalis). Obverse. perm(wj«) divi avg. COL{oma) ROM{uia). Head of Augustus surrounded by rays. Reverse. IVLIA AVGVSTA GENETRIX ORBIS. Head of lulia. F 2 68 PART TI.— TIBERIUS TO VESPASIAN. Cohen, i. p. 165, No. 807. Large bronze of Leptis in Africa. Cf. p. 207, No. 203, similar coin with Itnp. Tib. Caesar Aug. cos. ^ on obverse. Eckhel, vi. 155. Odv. IMP. CAESAR A\{gtist7is). Head of Augustus. Rev. AVGVSTA MATER PATRIAE. Seated figure of luHa. Nos. 49-51 illustrate the statement of Dio Cassius (57. 12. 4) • TToAAot yikv ixrjrepa avTtjv rrji iraTpiho^, 770XA01 8e /cat yovia TTpocrayopevecrdai yvu>ixi]v ebu)Kav, and show that in spite of the refusal of Tiberius to ratify such honours decreed to his mother by the Senate (Dio Cass. 1. c), the provincial towns were at least not prohibited from conferring similar marks of distinction upon her. Mommsen remarks (St R. ii. 788, note 4) that with a weaker ruler than Tiberius, lulia Augusta would have taken her place as practically the colleague of the Princeps. For references to her attempts to assert her claims to a share in the Government, cf. Dio Cass. 56. 47 : tS)v Trpayixdrcov w? koI avTapxovaa avTeirouLTo. 57. I3. 3 : TrXrjv re ort ovre e? to (Tvvi- hpiov ovre e? ra o-rpaTOTTeha ovts es ras CKKX-qa-ias h6Xfxr](re itot€ ecrekOeiv, ra ye aWa iravra ws Kal avTap^ovcra bLoiKelv €7r€\€ip€i. Suet. Tid. 50 : partes sibi aeqiias potentiae vwdicans ; and for the way in which they were repressed by Tiberius, Dio Cass. 57. 12. 5. It is possible that Augustus may have in- tended her to occupy some such position, for the nomen Aiigustimi which she was empowered to assume under his will (Tac. Aim. 1. 8. 2), properly belongs to the reigning Princeps (5/. R. ii. 821). Seianus. 52. Cohen, i. p. 198, No. 97. Eckhel, vi. 196. Middle bronze of Bilbilis in His- pania Tarraconensis. /. THE EMPERORS. 69 Obverse. TI. CAESAR DIVI AVGVSTI F. AVGVSTVS. Head of Tiberius. Reverse. M\^{icij)Wm) AVGVSTA BILBILIS TI. CAESARE V. L. AELIO SEIANO COS. The last word within an oak wreath. 53- W. 64 «. From Interamna (Terni) on the Nar. The date (a.d. 32) expressed by ad with the accusative is irregular. The name of the colleague of Cn. Domitius Ahenobarbus was Camillus Arruntius (better known as M. Furius Camillus Scribonianus) erased after his rebellion against Claudius in a. d. 4a. The last words are p{ectinid) s(ua) fiacienduni) c{uravit). SALVTI • PERPETVAE • AVGVSTAE GENIO • MVNICIPI • ANNO • POST LIbERTATIQVE • PVBLICAE INTERAMNAM • CONDITAM POPVLI • ROMANI DCCIII • AD • CN • DOMITIVM AHENOBARBVM camilhnn COS arrtintium PROVIDENTIAE • TI • CAESARIS • AVGVSTI • NATI • AD • AETERNITATEM ROMANI • NOMINIS . SVBLATO • HOSTE • PERNICIOSISSIMO • P • R FAVSTVS • TITIVS • LIBERALIS • VI • VIR • AVG • ITER P • S • F • C The coin No. 52 is quite as much a monument of the excep- tional position to which Tiberius raised Sejanus, as of the adula- tion which that position brought him from provincial towns like Bilbilis. Tiberius was Consul only three times after becoming Emperor, twice in order to give to Germanicus and Drusus the prestige of having the Princeps as their colleague (a.d. 18 and ai), the third time in order to pay the same compliment to Sejanus (a.d. 31). Whether or not Tiberius intended to put him off his guard and keep him at Rome, as Suetonius suggests {Tib. 65), this was the highest mark of favour that he could confer short of making him his colleague in the Empire ; and in the eyes of the world the inference would be that Sejanus had succeeded to the place formerly occupied by the sons and heirs-apparent of the Emperor. The people 70 PART II.— TIBERIUS TO VESPASIAN. of Bilbilis commemorated the importance of the occasion by- inscribing the name of Sejanus as well as that of his Imperial colleague on their coins of the year (No. 52). How excep- tional the honour was, may be measured by the fact that in A.D. 18 they had omitted the name of the Emperor's col- league, Germanicus, though he was his adopted son (Cohen, i. p. 198, No. 96 : Miin. Augusta Bilbilis Ti. Caesare III cos). After the death of Sejanus on Oct. 18 (Tac. Ann. 6. 25. 4) his name was as far as possible erased from the coins. For instances of such erasure, see Eckhel, 1. c. There can be no doubt that the hostis perniciosissinnis of No. ^"i^ is Sejanus. It was erected the year after his fall and, as we might expect, by one specially interested in the welfare of the Imperial house, a sevir Aiignsialis. Gaius and his Family. 54- C. I. L. vi. 886, 887. The marble receptacles on which Nos. 54, 55 are inscribed, and which contained the actual ashes, were brought from the Mau- soleum of Augustus to the Capitol in the fourteenth century. That of Agrippina may still be seen there in the courtyard of the Palace of the Conservatori. That of her son has disappeared. OSSA AGRIPPINAE • M • AGRIPPAE • / DIvI • AVG • NEPTIS • VXORIS GERMANICI • CAESARIS 5 MATRIS • C • CAESARIS • AVG GERMANICI • PRINCIPIS 55- OSSA NERONIS . CAESARIS GERMANICI • CAESARIS • F DIvI • AVG • PRON • FLAMIN 5 AVGVSTALIS • QVAESTORIS /. THE EMPERORS. 71 56. C. I. L. vi. 882. On the obelisk which stands in front of St. Peter's at Rome. Originally brought by Gaius from Egypt and placed in the Circus of his gardens on the Vatican (Plin. H. N. i6. 201), on the site of which it remained till moved to its present position in 1586. DiVO • CAESARI • dIvI • IVLlI • F • AVGV.STO Tl • CAESARI • DIvI • AVGVSTi • F • AVGVSTO SACRVM 57- Cohen, i. p. 231, No. i. Eckhel, vi. 213. Large bronze issued under Gaius. The arg^ument of Eckhel in favour of attributing all the memorial coins of Agrippina to Claudius on account of the mention of Agrippa(v. infr.), is refuted by No. 54. Obverse. AGRIPPINA M. F. MAT. C. CAESARIS AVGVSTI. Head of Agrippina. Reverse, s. P. Q. R. MEMORIAE AGRIPPINAE. Representa- tion of a carpentuni drawn by two mules. One of the first acts of Gaius was to bring the remains of his mother from Pandateria the scene of her exile and death in A.D. '^'^ {Tac.Anu. 6. 25. Suet. Tib. 5;^), and those of his brother Nero from Pontia, where he had come to his end in A.D. 31 (Suet. Tib. 54). Suet. Ca/. 15 : confestivi Pandateriani et Po7itias ad transferendos matris fratrisque cineres festinavit, tempestate tiirbida^ quo magis pietas enimeret, adiitque vener- abundus ac per semet m tirnas condidit ; nee minor e scaena Ostiam, praejixo in biremis pnppe vexillo, et inde Romam Tiberi stibvectos, per splcndidissiniiini qnemqiie equesiris ordinis medio ac freqiienti die duobiis ferculis Mansoleo inUilit. The coin No. 57 is explained by the next words : ijiferiasqtie is annua religione piiblice instiUiit et eo amplins matri Circenscs carpen- tionque quo in pompa traduceretur. The epitaph of Agrippina (No. 54) shows that the attitude towards his ancestor Agrippa 72 PART II.— TIBERIUS TO VESPASIAN. attributed to Gaius by Suetonius was, quite characteristically, only a caprice {Cal. 23. Cf. his rehabilitation of Antonius at the expense of Augustus. Dio Cass. 59. 20 ; Suet. Cal. 23). The omission of Tiberius among the ancestors in his brother's epitaph (No. ^^) is intentional and marked. Gaius after con- ducting his predecessor's funeral (Dio Cass. 59. 3 ; Suet. Cal. 15) had omitted his name from the annual itisiiwandum iti acta (Dio Cass. 59. 9, cf. p. 86), and lost no opportunity of vilifying him in public (id. 59. 16). But Dio (1. c.) shows that he was obliged to withdraw from this attitude which he no doubt began to feel was undermining the prestige of the Principate, and it is possible that the inscription on the Vatican obelisk (No. 56) may have been intended to let the world know his altered views. Certainly the honour is peculiar, and amounts practically to deification. (Mommsen on C. I. L. vi. 882 : qiialis consecrationis factae honiini defuncto non relato inter divos alterum exemplum nott facile reperias.) The Accession of Claudius : A.D. 41. 58. Cohen, i. p. 254, No. 40. Eckhel, vi. 235. Aureus of a. d. 41. Obverse. TI. CLAVD. CAESAR AVG. P. M. TR. P. Head of Claudius. Reverse. IMPER. RECEPT. Representation of the Castra Praetoria at Rome. Cohen, i. p. 256, No. 77. Eckhel, vi. 235. Aureus of a. d. 41. Obverse. Ti. clavd. caesar avg. p. m. tr. p. Head of Claudius. Reverse, praetor. RECEPT. Claudius giving his hand to a praetorian soldier who holds a standard. These coins, coming from the Imperial mint, represent the /. THE EMPERORS. accession of Claudius from two points of view, (i) that of the Guards, and (2) that of the Emperor, The political results of the ' esprit de corps ' generated among the Praetorians by their concentration in the permanent camp represented on No. 58 (cf. Tac. Ann. 4. 2), are illustrated by the legend Imperatore recepto, implying as it does that an Emperor was necessary for their continued existence. It is possible that the words may contain a further reference to the fact that Claudius, on his discovery, was carried off to the camp by the Guards and spent the first night of his reign there (Suet. CI. 10: receptus intra vallum, inter exciibias viilitiim pernoctavit). On the other hand Claudius owed his elevation solely to the Guards, for the other part of the garrison of the capital, the cohortes urbanae, placed themselves in the first instance at the dispo- sition of the Senate (Suet. 1. c. : consnles cum senatn et cohor- tibus tirbanis forum Capitoliumque occupaverant asserturi commnnem libertateni). The scene of the taking of the sacra- mentum by the Praetorians (with receptis in No. 59 supply /;/ fidem) was therefore a fitting memorial of the accession of the first Emperor who owed his position to them, and who recognised his obligation by a substantial reward. Suet. CI. 10 : armatos pro cofitione iurare in nomen suum passus est promi- sitqtie singulis quina dena sestertia, primus Caesarum fidem militis etiam praemio pigneratus. The Rise of Burrus : Sole Praefectus Praetorio : A.D. 51. 60. C. I. L. xii. 5842. Found at Vaison (Vasio). The larger part is now in the Museum at Avignon. vasiens ^ voc patr6no SEX AFRANIO ^ SEX ^ Y ^ VOLT ^ BURRO 74 PART 11. — TIBERIUS TO VESPA SI A N. 5 TRIE ^ mIL PROC i? AVGVS TAE (? PROC q5 tI • CAESAR PROC dIvi clavdI PRAEF • PRA^-TORI C^ ORNA M^;^/Is CONSVLAR Vasiens[ium) Voc{ontiorum) patrono Sex. Afranio Sex. f. Volt[inid) [tribii) Burro, trib{tino) mil{ituni), proc{uratori) Augustae, proc{nratori) Ti. Caesar{is),proe{nratori)divi Claudi, praef[ect6) pra\e'\tori.,ornam\e7it\is consnlar\ibiis ornato ] This inscription gives us the only information we possess about the career of Burrus before he obtained the command of the Guards in A.D. 51. As Vasio belonged to the Vol- tinian tribe, it is probable that he was a native of the civitas of which in the days of his greatness he became patron, (For the Vasienses Vocontii, see p. 14.) The steps in his promotion illustrate the equestrian career in its earlier form, starting with military service as a legionary tribune {tribunus militiim angusticlavitis), passing into the personal service of the Emperor as procurator of some part of his possessions, and finally reaching the highest post open to an eques, that of praefectus praeiorio. But the way in which the service of the Emperors, including that of Augusta (i. e. Livia, the mother of Tiberius) is here spoken of absolutely, with no department specified, shows that the procurator is as yet hardly an official, but only a private servant (cf. C. I. L. x. 7489 : proc. Ti. Cacsaris et hiliae Augustae). The command of the Guards as instituted by Augustus (Dio Cass. 53. 24) was, no doubt as a matter of precaution, divided between two praefecti (in later times occasionally three), and this arrangement was generally followed by his successors, though apparently at the death of Augustus Seius Strabo was in sole command (Tac. Ann. i. 7. 3). The reasons which induced Agrippina to replace Lusius Geta and Rufrius 7. THE EMPERORS. 75 Crispinus by Burrus in A.D. 51 are stated by Tacitus, Ann. 12. 42. He retained the position till his death in A.D. 62, when the dual command was restored (Tac. Ann. 14.51). L. Verginius Rufus. Defeat of Vindex: A.D. 68. 61. C /. L. V. 5702. From the district S. of the lake of Como. Now in the Brera at Milan. I O VI • O • M PRO salvTe ET • VICTORIA • L vergini • rvfi 5 pYlades • salTvar V • s lovi o[pthn6) m[aximo), pro salute ct victoria L. Vcrgini Ruji, Pylades saltuar[ius) v{oitcm) s{olvit). When C. Julius Vindex, the legatus of Gallia Lugudunensis, revolted from Nero in March A.D. 68, L. Verginius Rufus, the commander of the army of Upper Germany, marched against him, and in a battle fought outside Vesontio, the German legions annihilated the untrained Gauls opposed to them (Dio Cass. 6'^. 24). Immediately afterwards the legions offered the Empire to Verginius (Dio Cass. 6'^. 25), and though he refused it, partly on the ground that the successor of the Julii must belong to the old nobility (cf. Tac. Hist. i. 52. 7 : Vcr- gininvi egtiestri familia ignoto patre), partly because he was a sincere Republican (cf. his epitaph in Plin. Ep. 9. 19 : liic situs est Rtif us piilso qni Vindicc quondam \ imperium adseruit non sibi sed patriae. Dio Cass. 63. 25. 3 : ttj re yap yepovQ-iq Kol rw h]ix(^ T:poa-)]Kiiv {to Kparos] (Keyev), it was considered doubtful whether he would persist in his renunciation of the Principate to which his position as holder of one of the most important commands in the Empire gave him a strong claim. 'je PART II.— TIBERIUS TO VESPASIAN. It must have been at this moment that No. 6i was erected by- some dependent of Verginius on one of his estates, which we know were in the neighbourhood of Comum (Plinius, Ep. 2. I. 8, says that one of the reasons for their friendship was that utrique eadem regio, municipia Jiniiima, agri etiam posses- sionesqiie coiiiimctae). Apart from the irregularity of attri- buting a victory to a legatus, the formula pro salute is one appropriated to reigning Emperors (see Index to Wilmanns, Exeinpla, p. 677); and the whole inscription is a record of the difficulty which the army and friends of Verginius must have had in realising that he would refuse the prize that was within his grasp. Mommsen, Hermes, vi. (1872) 127, xiii (1878) 90. Provinces, i. 82, 127. L. Clodius Macer. 62. Cohen, i. p. 318, No. 13. Denarius. Obverse. L. CLODIVS MACER S. C. Head of Macer. Reverse. PROPRAE. AFRICAE. Representation of a galley. 63. Cohen, i. p. 318, No. 9. Denarius. Obverse, roma s. c. Head of Roma wearing helmet. Reverse. L. CLODI MACRI. Representation of a trophy. 64. Cohen, i. p. 317, No. 2. Denarius. Obverse. CLODI MACRI S. c. Female figure (Liberty) hold- ing cap of Liberty and patera. Reverse, leg. I. lib. macriana. Legionary eagle and two ensigns. /. THE EMPERORS. 77 65. Cohen, i. p. 317, No. 6. Denarius. Liberatrix refers to Africa. Obverse. L. CLODI MACRI LIBERATRIX s. c. Bust of Africa. Reverse. LEG. ill. lib. avg. Same type as No. 64. These coins, with a few others (see Cohen, i. p. 31 7, and refer- ences given below), are the only monuments which we possess of the somewhat obscure attempt made by L. Clodius Macer, the Imperial legatus in Africa (Suet. Galba, 11), to seize the Principate on the death of Nero. There can be little doubt that his real intention was to become Emperor, but the coins show that he began by posing as a Republican, probably with a view to securing the support of the Senate. It will be noticed that all his coins, though silver, are issued in the name of that body ; that on all but one (No. 62) his name appears in the genitive, and his Q^gy is omitted ; and that at least one of them (No. 6"^) is a direct imitation of the coin- age of the Republic. Moreover he calls himself propraetor Africae (No. 62), the regular title of the Governors of Africa before the establishment of the Empire. Tacitus mentions [Hist. 2. 97. 3) Icgio coJiortesqne delectae a Clodio Macro, and we learn from No. 64 that he called the new legion by his own name. It is uncertain whether the epithet, in the case of both legions, is lib{era), 1. e. belonging to the Senatus Popu- lusque Romanus and not to the Emperor, or lib[eratrix), as in the case of Africa (No. 6^), because they were the instru- ments for emancipating the Roman world from Imperial rule. The first steps of Macer may be compared with those of Galba. Suet. Galba, 10 : legatiim se senates ac poptili R. professus est. Dein . . . e plcbe guidem provviciac Icgiones ct auxilia conscripsit super exercitinn veterem. The galley repre- sented on No. 62 seems to imply some command of the sea, and on the reverse of two of his coins (Cohen, i. p. 318, Nos. 10, 11) is the legend Sicilia, with the conventional 78 PART II.— TIBERIUS TO VESPASIAN. emblem of the island (the triquetra). This perhaps helps to illustrate the report that he meant to starve Rome out by keeping back the grain-ships (Tac. Hist. j. 73. 2. Plutarch, Galba, i'^). Before this and other designs could be carried out he was crushed (Tac. Hist. 1.7). Eckhel, vi. 288-290. L. 'KuWer, Nuntisniatique de Vancicmie Afrique, ii. 170-174. Mommsen, Rottiischcs Miimwesen, 745 and note 17. C. I. L. viii. p. xx. Cagnat, VArmce Rotnaine dCAfrique, 149-154. Otho. 66. C /. L. vi. 2051, 76-80. Entrj' in the Acta Fratrum Arvalium (see Introduc- lion, p. xiv) for March 14, a. d. 69. Isdem cos pr. idus Mart, vota nuncupata pro s[rt'/]ute et reditu [ Vitellt\ Germanici imp. praeeunte L. Maecio Postumo, mag(isterio) [ VitellP^ Germanici imp., pro- mag(istro) Maecio Postumo, coll(egi) fratrum Arval(ium) nomine lov(i) b(ovem) m(arem), lun(oni) vacc(am), Min(ervae) vacc(am), Saluti p(ublicae) p(opuli) R(omani) vacc(am), divo Aug(usto) b(ovem) m(arem}, divae Aug(ustae) vacc(am), divo Claudio b(ovem) m(arem). In coll(egio) adf(uerunt) L. Maecius Postumus. The Emperor, for whose safety and return these vota were made on March 14, was not Vitellius but Otho, for the latter was still in Rome at that date (Tac. Hist. i. 90: pridie idus Martias cominendata patribiis repiiblica, &c. ; cf. id. 5 : pro- fectiis Otho). His death took place on April 16 (Clinton, Fasti Roviani, and cf. Tac. Hist. 2. ^y. [when the news came to Rome] Ceriales ludi [April 19] ex more spectabantur), and the dies imperii of Vitellius was April 19 {Acta, C. I. L. /. THE EMPERORS. 79 vi. 2051, 1. 85, Henzen, p. 64: ob diem imperi \yiielli\ Germanici imp{cratoris) quod XIII K. Mai{as) stahitiim est), when he also took the place which Otho had held as magister collegii. The entry therefore must have been altered to its present form before it was engraved on the marble, some time after the latter date. Finally, after the death of VitelHus (Dec. 22), his name was erased. For the form in which it appears, see p. 80. The Invasion of Italy : A. D. 69. 67. C. /. L. xi. 1 196. The lower half of a gravestone, now in the Museum at Parma. Probably found in or near Veleia. mi • MC r> ANN . XXV • STIP ^ II • vexillarI 5 ■ LEG • TRIW LEG • ini • MC LEG • XXI • R/P LEG- XXII -PRI P CJ D • S . . . leg{ionis)\ II I I Mac{cdonicae\ ann{oriiiii) XXV stip- [endiortim) II ; vcxillari leg{iomivi) trhim, leg[ionis) II I I Mac{edonicae) leg. XXI Rap{acis)^ leg. XXII Pri{mige7iiae) pipsuerunt) d{e) s{uo). This soldier belonged to the first of the two divisions with which Vitellius attacked Italy in A.D. 69, that commanded by Caecina, which took the shortest route to Italy from the Rhine over the Great St. Bernard, and was composed, as we see from this inscription and from Tacitus, of detachments from the three legions which formed the army of Upper Germany at this time {Hist. i. 61. 2 : triginta milia Caecina e 8o PART II.— TIBERIUS TO VESPASIAN. superior e Germania ducebat, quorum robur legio unactvice^i- sima fuit, cf. ^$. 3). He must have fallen in one of the unsuccessful attacks on Placentia, described in Tacitus, Hist. 2. 20-22. The members of all three legions join in the memorial as forming for the time being a single force. Vitellius and the Senate. Consul Perpetuus. 68. C. I. L. vi. 929. Cf. St. R. ii. 1097, note 2. The only inscription from the city of Rome relating to Vitellius which is known. The original has disappeared. The pedestal (probably belonging to a statue) on which it is inscribed seems to have escaped destruction by being converted into a sepulchral urn. A • VITELLTVS • L • F • IMPERATOR . • COS • PERP • Suetonius, Vitellius, ii : co^nitia in decent annos ordinavit seque perpetuimi cojisidem. The renunciation of the annual Consulship by Augustus being the decisive measure which distinguished the Principate from the Republican Magistracy (p. 6), the action of Vitellius in restoring the arrangement of B.C. 27 was no doubt, as Schiller suggests [Gesch. der Kaiser- zeit, i. 381), intended to secure the support of the Senate, a view which is confirmed by the fact that when Gaius on his accession declared that he would be only the instrument of the Senate's will (Dio Cass. 59. 6), that body proposed that he should Kar hos viraTsveLv (1. c. 6. 5). This attitude of Vitellius to the Senate is illustrated by the anecdote in Taci- tus, Hist. 2. 91. 5, and by some of the coins issued by the Imperial Mint (cf esp. Cohen, i. p. ^6^, no. 84, aureus with SPQR on the reverse). The inscription further illustrates the fact that Vitellius, with a similar political intention, refused to assume the names Augustus and Caesar (Suet. Vit. 8 : cognomen Germanici dclatum ab univcrsis cupide recepit, Augusti distulit, Cae saris /. THE EMPERORS. 8[ in perpetmwi reaisavit. Tac. Hist. 2. 62. 3, but ci 2. 90. 2, 3. 58. 5). If the view taken of this inscription be correct, the absence of ' Germanicus ' will not be surprising, referring as that title did to the real source of his power, the German legions (Tac. Hist. 1. 62. 4). For the names of Vitellius see Wilmanns, i. p. 295. Civilis and the Imperium Galliarum. 69. Mommsen, Hermes, xix. (1884), 437. Legionary tiles found at Mirebeau-sur- Beze, fifteen miles N.E. of Dijon, in the territory of the Lingones. See also P. Lejay, Inscriptions de la Coie-eTOr, p. 172. f VEXIL • LEGIONVM I • VIII • XI • XIIII • XXI This tile must have belonged to some building erected by a detachment of the army sent by the government of Vespasian, under the command of Q. Petillius Cerialis, to suppress the Imperium Galliarum (Tac. Hist. 4. 59. 2, 75. 2) which the leaders of the Lingones and Treveri were endeavouring to found in co-operation with Civilis and the Batavi (Tac. Hist. 4. 54 sqq.). The composition of that force is thus described by Tacitus {Hist. 4. 68. 5, with Mommsen's emendations) : legioncs victrices octava, tindccima, tertia dccinia [?] {MS. 'aim, xj\ nnj), Vitellianamvi tinaetvi- censima, e recens cotiscriptis sectmda, Poeninis Cottiatiisgtie Alpibus, pars monte Graio, tradiicimtiir : quarta dccima Icgio e Britannia, scxta ac prima ex Hispania accitac. Apparently no resistance was offered by any place among the Lingones after the occupation of Augusta Treverorum by Cerialis (Tac. Hist. 4. 72, 76. 5, and cf Frontinus, Strateg. 4. 3. 14 : auspi- ciis Impcratoris Caesar is Domitiani Azignsti Germanici eo hello quod lu litis Civilis in Gallia mover at, Lingoniim opnlentis- sima civitas quae ad Civilem desciverat, ctttn adveniente exercitii Caesaris popidationem timeret, qiiod contra exspectationem in- violata nihil ex rebns snis amiserat, ad obseqninm redacta G 82 PART IL— TIBERIUS TO VESPASIAN. septuaginta vnlia armatormn tradidit inihi). The vexillatio therefore was probably stationed here to secure the district, while the main body was engaged with the Germans and Gauls who were still in arms (Tac. Hist. 4. 77). Accession of Vespasian. The Lex de Imperio. 70. C. / L. vi. 930. On a bronze tablet now in the Capitoline Museum at Rome, where it has been preserved since 1576. Probably discovered in the fourteenth century, when it was set up by Cola di Rienzi in St. John Lateran. foedusve cum quibus volet facere liceat, ita uti licuit divo Aug(usto), Ti. I alio Caesari Aug., Tiberioque Claudio Caesari Aug. Germanico ; utique ei senatum habere, relationem facere, remittere, senatus consulta per relationem discessionemque facere liceat, g ita uti licuit divo Aug., Ti. lulio Caesari Aug., Ti. Claudio Caesari Augusto Germanico ; utique cum ex voluntate auctoritateve iussu mandatuve eius praesenteve eo senatus habebitur, omnium rerum ius perinde habeatur servetur, ac si e lege senatus edictus esset habereturque ; ]o utique quos magistratum potestatem imperium curationemve cuius rei petentes senatui populoque Romano commen- daverit, quibusque suffragationem suam dederit promiserit, eorum comitis quibusque extra ordinem ratio habeatur ; utique ei fines pomerii proferre promovere, cum ex re publica 15 censebit esse, liceat ita uti licuit Ti. Claudio Caesari Aug. Germanico ; utique quaecunque ex usu rei publicae maiestate[que] divinarum huma[na]rum publicarum privatarumque rerum esse /. THE EMPERORS. 83 censebit, ei agere facerc ius potcstasque sit, ita uti div^o Aug, 20 Tiberioquc lulio Cacsari Aug,Tiberioque Claudio Caesari Aug. Germanico fuit ; utique quibus legibus plebeive scitis scriptum fuit ne divus Aug., Tiberiusve lulius Caesar Aug., Tiberiusque Claudius Caesar Aug. Germanicus tenerentur, iis legibus plebisquc scitis Imp. Caesar 25 Vespasianus solutus sit ; quaeque ex quaque lege rogatione divum Aug., Tiberiumve lulium Caesarem Aug., Tiber- iumve Claudium Caes. Aug. Germanicum facere oportuit, ea omnia imp. Caesari Vespasiano Aug. facere liceat ; utique quae ante banc legem rogatam acta gesta 30 decreta imperata ab imperatore Caesare Vespasiano Aug. iussu mandatuve eius a quoque sunt, ea perinde iusta rataq(ue) sint, ac si populi plebisve iussu acta essent. Sanctio. Si quis huiusce legis ergo adversus leges rogationes plebisve scita 35 Senatusve consulta fecit fecerit. sive, quod eum ex lege rogatione plebisve scito s(enatus)ve c(onsulto) facere oportebit, non fecerit huius legis ergo, id ci ne fraudi esto neve quit ob eam rem populo dare debeto, neve cui de ea re actio neve iudicatio esto, neve quis de ea re apud [.y]e agi sinito. This fragment is the only example which has come down to us, of the single legislative act by which the Princeps was constitutionally invested with the various powers which made G 2 84 PART II.— TIBERIUS TO VESPASIAN. up the Principate. Cf. Dio Cassius, ^'>^. 32. 6 : (Augustus) KcCi o\ jxer avTov avTOKparopes iv vojic^ 8?; twl rots re ciAAots Kai rrj k^ovaia rfj hi]iJiapxiKf] (■)(prjaavTO. Gaius, !• 5 • ^^^''^ ^P'S^ inipe^ rator per legem impcrhim accipiat. Ulpian, Dig. 14. i : cum lege regia quae de imperio eius lata est popiihis ei {impe- riiini) et in eiim onme simm imperiiim et potesiatein eonferat. The existing fragment contains only the latter part of this lex, but it is simplest to assume that its earlier clauses con- ferred both the imperium and the tribunicia potestas, for while the passages quoted above are definite as to the single act, that act is spoken of sometimes as the lex de imperio (Ulpian, 1. c), sometimes as concerned with the tribimicia potestas {Acta Fr. Arv. Henzen, p. 65 [Otho, Vitellius, Domi- tian] ob comitia tribunieiae potestatis), according as the one or the other of the two most important elements of the Emperor's power is emphasized. The magistrate (probably a Consul ; Tac. Ann. 1. 13. 4. St. R. ii. 874, note 3) who brought the rogatio before the Comitia (probably the Centuriata, St. R. ii. 875, note 1), was of course authorised to do so by a decree of the Senate, strictly defining the terms of the proposal. Hence, while No. 70 is referred to as a lex (11. 29, 34, 36), the clauses are in the form of those of a senatus consnltnm (introduced by nti depending on censtiernnt : the form of a lex is imperative as the Sanctio is here), for the lex de imperio embodied the actual decree of the Senate. The proceedings in the Senate being practically of more importance than the formality in the Campus, the senatiis cojisulttim is often the only act mentioned (Tac. Hist. i. 47. 2: adenrrnnt patres ; deceimititr Othoni tribunicia potestas et noinen Augitsti et omnes priiicipum honor es. Vita Probi, 12. 8: decerno igitur p.c. votis om- nium concinentibus nomen imperaforium, nomen Caesareanum, nomen Augustum, addo proconstdare imperium, patris patriae reverentiam, pojitificatum maximum, iustertiae relationis, tribu- niciam potestatem. Post hacc adclamatum est: 'omJtes,omnes'). THE EMPERORS. 85 The frequent references to the precedents of former leges de ivtpei^io (Nero is omitted as damnatae memoriae, and Gains as practically though not formally so treated, Dio Cass. 60. 4. 5) emphasize the fact that, while the general object of the measure was to place the Emperor designate in the position held by Augustus after B.C. 23, that position was only the result of the concentration in one hand of a number of powers which might be varied or enlarged according to circumstances. The only positive additions to the powers held by Augustus, are the his prof erendi pomerii (I. 14), and possibly the unlimited right oi commendatio (1. 10). II. I, 2. Strabo, 17. 3. 25, p. 840: (Augustus) T;o\i\xov Kat clprjvrjs KaT^o-TT] Kvpios 5ta jBCov. Dio Cass. 53- 17- 5" TroAe'/zovs re avatpe'icrdai. /cat €lpr]irjv (ntevbeadai. Cf. Suet. CI. 25 • cum regibiis foediis i?iforo icit porea eaesa ac vetcre fetialmin prae- fatione adJiibita. 11. 3-9. The next two clauses refer to the Emperor's rights with regard to meetings and business of the Senate, apart from those which he possessed by virtue of his tribiinicia potestas. Augustus was empowered (Dio Cass. ^'^. 32. 5) )(pt]lxaTi(^€iv irept h'os Ttvos otov av e6eXi](rj] Kad eKaaTi]!' ftov\i]V, KCLv p.1] vTTaTemj {I'clationcm facer c\ and (Dio Cass. 54- 3- 3) t?V' l3ov\r}v a6poi(eLv ocra/cts av (0e\i](nj {scnatinn habere). The reasons which made these special powers necessary, have been explained abovC; p. 8. Relationcm rcinitterc is ex- plained by Tacitus, Ann. 3. 10 : Fidcinius Trio Pisoncvi apud consides posUdavit . . . petitinn est a prineipe cogniiionem exci- perci . . . {Tiberius) integram causain ad senatum remittit {St. R. ii. 900). Per relationein disccssioncjuque does not refer to two methods of obtaining the decision of the Senate. but, as the copula shows, to one only, that per disccssiouem ; per relatio7iem being inserted as the necessary preliminary to every decree of the Senate, whether there were a perrogatio sententiarum or not {St. R. iii. 983, note 4). 11. 10-13. From the beginning the Emperors practically 86 PART II— TIBERIUS TO VESPASIAN. controlled the elections to all magistracies, either by their right covuiioidare candidates sine repidsa ct anibitii designandos (Tac. Ann. i. 15. 2), or by the use they made of their power to receive the names of candidates (e.g. Tac. Ann. i. 14. 6 : candidaios praetnrae diiodecini nominavii). It will be noticed that the present clause, dealing with the former right, that of conimejidaiio, is quite unlimited, and that it contains no refer- ence to precedents. The earlier Emperors, whatever their powers may have been, certainly only made a restricted use of the right {St. R. ii. 923, no instances in case of the Consulship. For the other magistracies, cf. Tac. Ann. i. 15. 2 : moderante Tiberio ne plnres qiiam quattiior candidates covi- mendarct), whereas from the time of Nero onwards we find even the Consuls appointed in this way (Tac. Hist. i. 77. 2 : \Otho\ proximos menses Verginio destinat . . . inngitnr Ver- ginio Pompcins Vopiscns . . . ceteri consn/atus ex destitia- tione Neronis ant Galbae inansere\ It is therefore possible that the unlimited power of commendatio here given to Ves- pasian may date only from the reign of Nero [St. R. ii. 924). Illusory as was the effect of such a renunciation of privilege, it must be remembered that even after Vespasian the Em- perors did not make full use of the unlimited right, as the title candidatns Caesaris shows. II. 14-16. See No. 73. The omission of the name of Augustus here, and the silence of the Ancyran Monument are conclusive against Tacitus, Ann. 12. 23. 5, and Dio Cass. ^^. 6. 6. St. R. ii. 1072. 11. 17-21. Ulpian, Dig. i. 4. i : quod principi placnit legis habet vigorem . . . qnodcnmqiie igitur imperator per episttdavi et s7ibscriptio)iem statuit vcl cognosccns decrevit vel de piano interlocntns est vel edicto praeccpit legem esse constat : haec sunt qiias vidgo constitntiones appellamiis. The iusinranduni in acta, not only those of the reigning Princeps, but also those of his predecessors (except those damnatae memoriae\ is a necessary consequence of this power. St. R. ii. 909. \ //. ROME AND ITALY. 87 11. 22-28. The Emperor is not set above the law, but by exception exempted from its operation in particular cases. Hence we find Emperors applying to the Senate for exemp- tions in cases not covered by this clause, cf Dio Cass. ^6. 32, 59. i5. Later the Emperor was regarded as able to dispense himself in every case {^St. R. ii. 751)- 11. 29-32, This retrospective ratification brings out the distinction between the designation of the Imperator by acclamation of the Senate or army, and his legal investiture with the powers of the Principate. The former authorised him in a sense to act as Emperor, and Vespasian dated his accession from it (Suet. Vcsp. 6: Kl. hd. qui principatns dies in posterum ohservatjis est). The ratification was specially necessary in the present case when some time had elapsed since the designation. Prof. Pelham, /o«r««/ of Philology, xvii. 45-51. According to the other authorities the imperitmi and the tribiinicia potcsias were conferred by separate acts, the additional powers of No. 70 forming part of the lex de tribunicia potestate (Mommsen, Staatsrecht, ii. 874-881 ; Willems, Droit Public Rontain, 5th ed. 422, 426), and the impcrium being given by the army or Senate. II. ROME AND ITALY. Claudius and the Water Supply of Rome. 71- C. /. L. vi. 1256. Above the two arches (afterwards converted into the Porta Maggiore) which carried the Aqua Claudia and the Anio Novus over the fork formed by the Via Labicana and Via Praenestina. Below this inscription are two others referring to restorations by Vespasian and Titus. TI • CLAVDIVS • DRVSI • F • CAISAR • AVGVSTVS • GER- MANICVS • PONTIF • MAXIM TRIBVNICIA • POTESTATE • xTl • COS • V • IMPERATOR • XXVII • PATER • PATRIAE AQVAS • CLAVDIAM • EX FONTIBVS • QVI • VOCABANTVR • CAERVLEVS • ET • CVRTIVS • A MILLIARIO • XXXXV ITEM • ANIENEM • NOVAM . A MILLIARIO • LXII • SVA • IMPENSA • IN VRBEM • PERDVCENDAS • CVRAVIT 88 PART II.— TIBERIUS TO VESPASIAN. 72. C /. L. vi. 1252. Above an arch of the aqueduct, which stands behind a house in the Via del Nazzareno, not far from the Fountain of Trevi the modern terminus of the Aqua Virgo. TI • CLAVDIVS • DRVSl • F • CAESAR • AVGVSTVS • GER- MANICVS PONTIFEX • MAXIM • TRIE • POTEST • V • IMP • XI • P • P • COS • DESIG • im ARCVS • DVCTVS • AQVAE • VIRGINIS • DISTVRBATOS • PER • C • CAESAREM A FVNDAMENTIS • NOVOS • FECIT • AC • RESTITVIT Claudius, following the example of Augustus, devoted con- siderable attention to the condition of Rome (Suet. CI. 18: urbis curam sollicitissime semper cgit)^ and particularly to the completion of its water supply. In A.D. 52 two aqueducts which had been begun by Gaius in A.D. 38, were finished under the names of the Aqua Claudia and the Anio Novus (No. 71, cf. Frontinus, de Aq. 13. Tac. Ami. 1 1. 13. 3. Suet. CI. 20). Both came from the Sabine mountains to the West of Rome, and the former from near the source of the Aqua Marcia which was considered to have the best water of all (hence Frontinus, de Aq. 13 : haec bonitate proxima est Marciae. Cf 14 : [the Claudia besides the springs mentioned in No. 71] accipit et eiini fo7item qui vacatur Albudiiius, tantae bonitatis ut Marciae quoque adiutorio qiiotiens opus est ita snfficiat tit adiectiis ei niliil ex qualitate eiiis mutet.) For the magnificent scale on which the Claudia was carried out see Pliny, H. N. 36. 122. The Aqua Virgo restored by Claudius in A.D. 46 (No. 72. C. I. L. vi. 1254 a boundary stone of the same restoration is dated A. D. 44-45), entered Rome on the North, and was one of the works of Agrippa (see p. 28). The reference to Gaius (1. 3) is characteristic and may be compared with the reflection on Tiberius in No. 79. 11, and the edict in Josephus [Ant. 19. 5. 2) there quoted. II. ROME AND ITALY. 89 Such important additions to the system of Roman aqueducts required a corresponding increase in the establishments con- nected with them. Hitherto the slaves employed belonged to the State [familia publica) and the expenses connected with their maintenance were paid through the Aerarium (Frontin. 118), an arrangement which dated from the death of Agrippa. When Claudius completed his new aqueducts he set apart for their service a number of his own slaves [familia Cacsaris)^ who were of course supported by the Emperor's purse (Fron- tin. 118). The tvjo familiae were kept distinct and continued to exist side by side. Frontin. de Aq. 116: familiae sunt duae, altera ptiblica, altera Caesar is. Publica est antiquior ; quam ab Agrippa relict am Augusto et ab eo publicatani dixi- inus [98] : Jiabet homines circiter ducentos quadraginta. Caesaris familiae mimerus est quadriugoitorum sexaginta ; quam Claudius cum aquas in urbem perduccret coistituii. Utraque auteni familia in aliquot ministeriorum species didu- citur. Of great importance for the Imperial control of the whole system was the appointment at the same time of a procurator aquarjim (Frontin. dc Aq. 105 : libertum Caesaris . . . procuratorem privius Ti. Claudius videtur admovisse post- quam Anienem Novum et Claudiam induxit). R. Lanciani, Comcntarii di Frontino. Atti d. Accad. dei Lincei, ser. 3. vol. 4, (1880), 215 sqq. and esp. 539. Hirschfeld, Vci-waltungsgcschichte, 163 sqq. Claudius and the Pomerium. 73. C. /. L. vi. 1231. One of four known examples of the cippi which marked out the Pomerium of Claudius. This one is built into the wall of a house in the Via di S. Lucia near the place where it was discovered. The date is a. d. 49. For the official adoption of the Digamma and other new letters by Claudius in A. D. 47, see Tacitus, Ann. 11. 14. 5. TI . CLAVDIVS DRVSI-F-CAISAR AVG • GERMANICVS 90 PART II.— TIBERIUS TO VESPASIAN. PONT • MAX • TRIB • POT 5 Villi • IMP . XVI . COS • nil CENSOR • P • P AVCTLS • POPVLI • ROMANI FInIBVS • POMERIVM AMPLIAJIT • TERMINAjIITQ Claudius, who had a special taste for constitutional an- tiquities, performed in A.D. 49 (probably in connection with his Census of A.D. 47) the act of enlarging the ideal boundary of the City known as the Pomerium (Tac. Ann. 13. 23. 4). The right to do this was traditionally one of the prerogatives of the kings, and under the Republic the practice was sus- pended until the dictatorship of Sulla. Claudius apparently was empowered to enlarge the Pomerium by a special enact- ment (No. 70. 14 : ntiqiie ci fines ponicrii p7'oferre . . . liceat ita uti licnit Tiberio Claudio Caesari Angus to Germanico) which may, as Detlefsen suggests [Hermes, xxi. 505), have been intended to settle the constitutional question which had arisen by the time of Claudius as to the conditions under which the act could be performed. Cf the contemporary reference of Seneca [de Brev. Vit. 13. 8) : Snllani idtimum Romanonini protulisse pomerium qtiod ntinqnam provinciali sed Italico agro adqnisito proferre moris apud antiquos fuit. There is nothing to tell us in which sense the controversy was decided by Claudius, but the formula on his cippi, a7iciis populi Romani finibus, is more in accordance with the theory that existed in the last century of the Republic (Gellius, 13. 14. 3 : habebat autevi ins proferendi pomerii qui popidum Romanum agro de hostibus capto anxcrat) than statements such as that of Tacitus [Ajin. 12. 23. 4): iis q2d protulere imperium etiam terminos urbis propagare datur (cf Vita Aureliani, 21. 10 : pomerio autem neminem principum licet addere nisi eum qjti agri bar- barici aliqua parte Romanam rempublicam locupletavcrit\ Moreover Detlefsen has shown that it is possible to prove an //. ROME AND ITALY. 91 actual increase of the agcr Italiciis and of the number of citizens in Italy under every one of the Emperors to whom an extension of the Pomerium is ascribed (1. c. 561), and therefore Claudius may have based his claim as much e. g. on the grant of Roman citizenship to the Anauni (see No. 79) as on the conquest of Britain. It was not till this enlargement of the Pomerium by Claudius that the Avcntine was included within the legal boundary of the city (Gellius, 13. 14), a proof that it was only in the very earliest times that the Pomerium coincided with the actual wall, for that of Servius took in the Aventine. As might have been expected the Campus Martins for constitutional reasons (connected e. g, with the Triumph and N. B. the presence there of the Imperial Mausoleum) still remained outside the fines 7irbani mispicii (Cell. 1. c), for one of the cippi of Ha- drian's restoration has been found between it and the city proper. D. Detlefsen, Das Pomeriiuii Rouis unci die Gremai Italicns. Hcrnics, x.\i. (1886^, 497. O. Richter, Topographte von Rom (^in Iwan Miiller's Handbuch, vol. 3^, 773- 775- Construction of the Portus Romanus. 74- C. I. L. xiv. 85. On a slab of marble found among the ruins of the Portus Romanus, where it still remains. The letters were originally of bronze. The date is a. d. 46. TI • CLAVDIVS • DRV SI • F • CAESAR A V G • G E R M A N I C V S • P O N T I F • MAX TRIE • POTEST • VT • COS • DESIGN • iTTI • IMP • xTl • P • P FOSSIS • DVCTIS • A • TIBEKI • OPERIS • PORTV.y 5 CAVSSA • EMISSISQVE • IN MARE • VRBEM I NVND ATIONIS • PERICVLO • LI PER AVI T 92 PART II,— TIBERIUS TO VESPASIAN. C. I. L. xiv. 163. On a circular bronze plate intended to be fastened to a wall. Whether found at Ostia is not known. Now in the Museum at Berlin. CLAVDI OPTATI AVG • L TROC • PORTVS OSTIESIS To Claudius belongs the credit of overcoming, in face of the opposition of his own engineers (Dio Cass. 60. ii. 3), the ob- stacles which had deterred Julius Caesar from carrying out the design of giving Rome a sea-harbour (Suet. CI. 20). The principal reason for its construction was the necessity of pro- viding for the safety of the grain ships on which Rome de- pended for its food supply (Dio Cass. 60. 11 : [a.d. 142] At/xoS re Icryvpov yevo[xivov, ov [xovov Tijs (v rw Tore irapovrL a(f)6oi>ias t&v Tpo(j)av a\ka koL Trjs is Tiavra tov jxeTO, ravra alcava upovoiav ^TTOLTjcraTO . . . 3 : tovt^ ovv aviubMV Xijxiva re KaracrKeudcat eTie- Xet/)j?crev). Previously they were unloaded either at Puteoli, or in the open sea outside Ostia (Strabo, 5. 3. 5, p. 231 : "I2o-rta TToAts d/\t/xez^os . . . irapaKwbvrMS p.\v ovv opp-i^ovTai fxerioipa iv rw ad\u> TO. vavKX-qpta, to [i^vtoi AucrtreAes viko.' koL yap ?/ tu>v vnripe- TiKwv crKa(f)S)V evTTopta r&v kKhe^op-ivoiv to. (f)opTLa kol dtTt^opri- ^ovToyv Ta^vv Trotei rbv cnroTiXovv, irplv r) tov TTOTap-ov a\}/a(Tdaij. For descriptions of the harbour and its construction see Dio Cassius, 60. II. 4. Pliny, H. N. 16. 201. Prof. Mayor on Juvenal, 12. 75, and cf. the references given below at the end of the section. The work was undertaken by Claudius in the second year of his reign (Dio Cass. 1. c), and No. 74 shows that it was still in progress in A.D. 46, but the undated coins of Nero with the legend : Fortius) Ost{iensis) Angusti and a repre- sentation of the harbour (Eckhel, vi. 276. Cohen, i. p. 280. '^'^ sqq.) mean that it was completed by his successor. It was //. ROME AND ITALY. 93 thenceforward known as the Portus August!, a title which has no reference to any supposed share of Augustus in the design {C. I. L. xiv. p. 6, note 2), but was probably chosen by Nero or his subordinates (as suggested in C. I. L. xiv. p. 6, note 4) in order to deprive Claudius of the honour of giving his name to the work. The new harbour was far from being a safe anchorage in all weathers, for in A.D. 62 we hear of ships being lost portii i7t ipso (Tac. Ann. 15. 18. 3), and the inner harbour constructed by Trajan was intended to remedy this defect. The canal which connected the basin with the Tiber also provided a new outlet for the stream, the flow of which was retarded by the sand-choked mouth at Ostia (Strabo, 1. c), and thereby reduced the probability of inundations in Rome (No. 74. 6). Claudius paid great attention to the food supply of the capital (Suet. 18 : annonae ciwam sollicitisswie egit), and the measures he took for securing it from the accidents of winds and waves were accompanied by various administrative re- forms. Before his time the grain trade of Ostia had been under the charge of the quaestor Osticnsis (Velleius, 2. 94. 3: [ Tiberius Claudius Nero'\ quaestor . . . maxiinam difficultatem annonae ac rci friimentariae inopiam ita Ostiae atq7ie in urbe mandatu vitrici moderatus est ut &^c.). The regulation of the harbour was now put in the hands of an Imperial Procurator (No. 75, a libertus apparently of Claudius), who later was replaced by an ofiicial of higher standing, an equestrian pro- air ator annonae (e.g. C.LL. xiv. 161 : Q. Calpurnio C.f{ilio) Qidriind) {tribu) Modesto, proc{uratori) Alpitim, proc[uratori) Ostiae adannon[am)^proc{tiratori) Lucaniae, eorpjis mercatorum fru7nentarioruin,&^c.). Both of course would be subordinate to the head of the department, the praefectus annonae at Rome {St. R. ii. 1043). Introduction to Inscriptions of Ostia by H. Dessau in C. I. L. xiv. 6-9. R. Lanciani, /?/f«T/it' Topografiche siilla Ciita di Porto : Anuali delT Instiluto di Corr. Arcli. 1868, 144. R. Lanciani, Ancient Rome, 238-247. Hirschfeld, VerwaUungsgeschichte, 139. 94 PART II.— TIBERIUS TO VESPASIAN. ' Increase of the Guards under Claudius. 76. C. I.L. V. 7003. On the pedestal of a statue erected by the colony of Augusta Taurinorum (Turin) to a fellow townsman (the citizens belonged to the tribus Siellaiina, cf 1. 2) who held the dignity of patronus coloniae. Now in the Museum at Turin. 1. 12 : d' ecurionmii) d' ccretd). C • GAVIO • L • F STEL • SILVANO /RIMIPILARI • 1-EG • Vm • AVG miBVNO • COH • Tl • VIGILVM 5 /RIBVNO . COH • XlTl • VRBAN /rIBVNO • COH • XH • PRAETOR <^0NIS • DONATO • A • dIVO • CLAVD BELLO • BRITANNICO /^RQVIBVS • ARMILLIS • PHALERIS 10 CORONA . AVREA /ATRONO . COLON Tt ^ d Under Augustus and Tiberius a force of twelve cohorts numbered consecutively, 1-9 being the coJiortes praetoriae, 10-12 the coJiortes iirba?iae, was stationed at Rome (Tac. Atin. 4. 5. 5 : qiiamqiiam insidcret nrbcm proprius miles, tres itrbanac, novcni praetoriae coJiortes). But there are a number of inscriptions — mainly epitaphs from the city of Rome — of officers and men of praetorian cohorts numbered eleven and twelve. At some time therefore the Guards must have been increased by three new cohorts. We know that Vitellius raised the number of cohorts to sixteen in A. D. 69 (Tac. Hist. 1. 93. 3), but No. 76 shows that the cohort to which Gavius Silvanus who was put to death by Nero for his share in Piso's conspiracy in A.D. 6^ (Tac. Ann. 15. 50. 3, 71. 4), belonged was the twelfth. The change had therefore been made at least as early as the reign of Nero. As there is no reference //. ROME AND ITALY. 95 to it in the books of Tacitus which wc possess, and as it is difficult to suppose that he would have passed it over, it is not unlikely that the addition was made in the period covered by the lacuna in the Annals (death of Tiberius — A. D. 47). In that case it would not be easy to find a more appropriate occasion than the accession of Claudius, the first Emperor who owed his throne to the Guards. To strengthen the force would be at once to reward it for its services by increasing its power and prestige, and at the same time to ensure the efficiency of the means to which the Imperial government immediately owed its existence, and on which it ultimately relied for its continuance in power. At the same time apparently the number of coJiortcs urbanac was raised to nine (cf. esp. C. I. L. xi. 395), i. e. in ad- dition to the three original cohorts and the thirteenth which probably existed as early as Augustus, five new ones were enrolled. C. Gavius Silvanus joined the army invading Britain in A. D. 43 with a detachment of the Eighth Legion to which there is another reference in the inscription {Bull. Inst. 1872, loi) Z. Coicdio, L.f.Ani. Candido, tr. mil. leg. VIII Aug. &c. Hnnc Ti. Cl[andius) dies. Atig. Germ. revers[Hm) ex eastr'\is) don[is) mil{itarihis) don[avii) &^c. Mommsen, Hcnitcs, xiv. (1879^ 25; xvi. (i88i\ 643. The Guards under Vitellius. 77. C. I. L. vi. 2725. Found on the Via Nomentana near Rome. Now in the Vatican. Moderatus must have entered the Sixteenth Legion in a.d. 59 or 60. After coming to Italy and serving for eight years in the Guards (a.d. 69-77) he entered the corps of evocati Augttsii who were generally selected from the Praetorians for employment in various civil functions (but cf. Tac. Ann. 2.68. 3) under the immediate direction of the Praefectus Praetorio. Moderatus seems to have been architect of one of the Imperial armouries (the inscription is flanked by representations of a carpenter "s rule and square), i. e. perhaps he superintended its internal arrangements. He remained in the corps twenty- three years, and must have died at the age of about sixty under Trajan, in a. d. 96 PART II.— TIBERIUS TO VESPASIAN. 99 or loo. For the Evocati see Mommsen in Eph. Epigr. v. p. 142, and art. Exercitus in Smith's Diet, of Antiquities, 3rd ed. p. 792. C • VEDENNIVS • C • F QVI • MODERATVS • AI^Io MILIT • IN • LEG • XVI • GAL • A • X TRANLAT • IN • COH • TX PR 5 IN QVA • MILIT • ANN • VIII MISSVS • HONESTA • MISSION REVOC • AB • IMP • FACT • EVOC • AVG ARCITECT • ARMAMENT • IMP EVOC • ANN • XXIII 10 BONIS • MILITARIB • DONAT BIS • AB • DIVO ' VESP • ET IMP • DOMITIANO • AVG • GERM C. Vedennius C. f. Qni{rma) [tribti) Moderatus, {domd) Antio, militiavif) inleg{ione) XVI Gal{licci) a{nnis) X, tra7i{s)- lat{iis) in cohiortem) TX pr{aetoriam\ m qua milit[avit) ann{is) VIII, missus Jionesta mission{e), revoc^atus) ab impievatore), factitcs) evoc{ai2is) Aiig[usti), arciteci[us) arniament{arii) im- p[eratoris\evoc{atiis^ ann[is) XXIII, donis inilitarib{2is) donat{tis) bis ab divo Vesp[asiano) et imp{eratore) Domitiano Aug{iistd) Germ{anicd) . On the foundation of the Principate Augustus reconstituted the Praetorian cohorts, which under the Triumvirate had been selected from the legions (Appian, ^. C. ^.y. after Philippi Antonius and Octavianus af^Uaav rrjs arpareias tovs ivTekrj Xpovov ia-rpaTevjxivovs x^P'-^ oKTaKia-x^tXioiv ovs ber]9evTas en arpa- T€vea9aL (r(f)[(nv aiTobe^dixevoL bteiXovTo koL avve\6\L(Tav es crrpa- rrjyi8as ra^et?. Cf. the coins of Antonius with Choriium prae- toriarum and a representation of a legionary eagle. Eckhel, vi. 52. Cohen, i. 37. 7). Henceforward, as being more in ac- cordance with the restituta respiiblica (p. 4), the Guards of the Imperator were to be kept distinct from the legions and to be recruited separately (Tac. Ann. 4. 5. 5 : novein praetor iae coliortes Etruria ferine Umbriaqtie delectae ant vetere Latio et //. ROME AND ITALY. 97 coloniis antiqiiitus Romanis). But when Vitellius was made Emperor by the legions of the Rhine army, it was not un- natural that, relying as he did on those legions for the main- tenance of his position, he should get rid of the existing Praetorian cohorts and form new ones out of his own followers. We know from Tacitus that he took the first step [Hist. 2. 6^ : proxiimis Vitcllio e praetoriis coJiortibtis metiis erat. separati priimim, delude addito Jionestae missionis lenimento anna ad tribimos sjios defet'ebant)^ and that when he enrolled the new cohorts he took the opportunity of increasing their number {Hist. 2. 93 : sedecini praetoriae qnaitttor nrbanac coJiortcs scribcbantnr qitis singida milia incsseiit). No. 77 shows that the new Guard was raised from the German legions. The Sixteenth Legion formed part of the army of Lower Germany in A. D. 69 (Tac. Hist. i. ^^. 2) and marched to Italy under the command of Valens, Cf Hist. 2. 93. 3 : sedecini praetoriae . . . cohortes scribebantiir . . . pins in eo delectn Valens andcbat . . . onmisqiie infcrioris Germaniae miles Valenteni adsectabatnr). With the fall of Vitellius his Guards were ordered to be dis- charged, but there were difficulties in the way of carrying out such a measure rigorously, and it is quite consistent with the narrative of Tacitus [Hist. 4. 46) that Moderatus should have remained in the service for eight years after the accession of Vespasian. Mommsen, Die Gardetrtippen derroynischen Republik und der Kaiserscit. Hermes, xiv. (1879), 25, and esp. 32 note. The Italian Fleet under Claudius. 78. C. /. L. iii. p. 844, X. 769. Found at Stabiae. Now in the Museum at Naples. The date is Dec. 11, a. d. 52. For the Diplomata MiHtaria see Introduction, p xiv. {a) Ti. Claudius Caesar Aug. Germanicus, pontifex maxim., trib. pot. XII, imp. XXVII, pater patriae, censor, cos. V, II 98 II.— TIBERIUS TO VESPASIAN. trierarchis et remigibus qui militave- 5 runt in classe quae est Miseni, sub Ti. lulio Aug(usti) lib(erto) Optato, et sunt dimissi honesta missione, quorum nomina sub- scripta sunt, ipsis liberis posterisque eorum civitatem dedit et conubium 10 cum uxoribus quas tunc habuissent cum est civitas iis data, aut, siqui caelibes essent, cum iis quas postea duxissent dum taxat singuli singulas. a. d. iii idus Decembr. 15 Fausto Cornelio Sulla Felice, L. Salvidieno Rufo Salviano, cos. gregali Spartico Diuzeni f. Dipscurto Besso. Descriptum et recognitum ex tabula aenea 20 quae fixa est Romae in Capitolio aedis Fidei populi Romani parte dexteriore. {b) L. Mesti L. f. Aem(ilia) ftribu) Prisci, Dyrrachini. L. Nutri Venusti, Dyrra- ^ chini. C. Durrachini ' % Anthi, Dyrra- .■S chini. C. Sabini «. Nedymi, Dyrra- •^ chini. C. Corneli ■§ Ampliati, Dyr- w rachini. T. Pomponi Epaphroditi, Dyrrachini. N(umeri) Mini Hylae, Thessalonicen- sis. The Italian fleet was established by Augustus in the form of two squadrons, the stations of which were at Ravenna and //. ROME AND ITALY. 99 Misenum (Suet. y^?/^. 49 : classcm Miscni ct alteram Ravcjmac ad tutclam Siipcri ct Inferi maris conlocavit). Under him and his immediate successors it was manned by Imperial slaves and freedmen (e.g. C-I.L. ix. 41 : MalcJiio Caesar is trier ar- chus), but by the time of Claudius, as No. 78 shows, and probably owing to a reorganisation effected by him, free-born subjects of the Empire {peregrini) coming mainly from the provinces of the eastern Mediterranean had been admitted to the service. The command held by an Imperial freedman may be an arrangement peculiar to the squadron at Misenum (cf Tac. Ann. 14. 3. 5 : [a. D. 59] Anicetus libertiis classi apnd Misemim praefcctits), and perhaps to be explained by its im- mediate relation to the Emperor as his personal guard when on the coast of Campania (hence both fleets were known at a later date as classes practoriae). By A. D. ^6 we hear of the fleet at Ravenna being commanded by an cqiies (Tac. Ann. 13. 30. 2 : Clodins Quirinalis pracfectus rcmignni qui RavcJinae haberentiir. Cf. C.I.L. v. ^'^^'^^ IV. 1244 where his career is given), and after the time of Vespasian this is the rule for both. Mommsen, Hermes, xvi. (1881), 463. E. Ferrero, Oydtiiamente delle Ayinaie Rotnane. Turin, 1878. Romanisation of the Alpine Tribes. The Civitas given to the Anauni : AD. 46. 79- C. I. L. V. 5050. On a bronze tablet found in 1869 at Cles in the Val di Non (Anauni). Now at Trient. The date is March 15, a. d. 46. In the text as given below the somewhat numerous errors of the original have been corrected In 1. 33 colledi is for allecti. M. lunio Silano Q. Sulpicio Camerino cos. idibus Martis Bais in praetorio edictum Ti. Claudi Caesaris Augusti Germanici propositum fuit id quod infra scriptum est. 5 Ti. Claudius Caesar Augustus Germanicus, pout. maxim., trib. potest., VI imp. XI, p. p., cos. designatus nil, dicit: H 2 ICO II.— TIBERIUS TO VESPASIAN. Cum ex veteribus controversis pendentibus aliquamdiu etiam temporibus Ti. Caesaris patrui mei, ad quas ordinandas Pinarium Apollinarem miserat, quae tantum modo lo inter Comenses essent, quantum memoria refero, et Bergaleos, isque primum apsentia pertinaci patrui mei, deinde etiam Gai principatu quod ab eo non exigebatur referre, non stulte quidem, neglexserit, et posteac detu]erit Camurius Statutus ad me agros plerosque 15 et saltus mei iuris esse : in rem praesentem misi Plantam lulium amicum et comitem meum qui cum, adhibitis procuratoribus meis quique in alia regione quique in vicinia erant, summa cura inqui- sierit et cognoverit, cetera quidem ut mihi demons- 20 trata commentario facto ab ipso sunt, statuat pronun- tietque ipsi permitto. Quod ad condicionem Anaunorum et Tulliassium et Sinduno- rum pertinet, quorum partem delator adtributam Triden- tinis, partem ne adtributam quidem arguisse dicitur, 25 tam et si animadverto non nimium firmam id genus homi- num habere civitatis Romanae originem : tamen cum longa usurpatione in possessionem eius fuisse dicatur et ita permix- tum cum Tridentinis ut diduci ab is sine gravi splendidi municipi iniuria non possit, patior eos in eo iure, in quo esse se existima- 3D verunt, permanere benificio meo, eo quidem libentius quod plerique ex eo generehominum etiam militare in praetorio meo dicuntur, quidam vero ordines quoque duxisse, non nulli collect! in decurias Romae res iudicare. Quod benificium is ita tribuo ut quaecumque tanquam 35 cives Romani gesserunt egeruntque aut inter se aut cum Tridentinis alisve, rata esse iubeam, nominaque ea quae habuerunt antea tanquam cives Romani, ita habere is permittam. 11. ROME AND ITALY. loi It is the latter portion of this inscription (1. 22 : qiiod ad condicionem. Anaunonim, &c.) which is most important for historical purposes, but it is necessary to explain the circum- stances under which the whole edict was issued. It has been shown above (p. 38) how the principle of attribiitio was applied to certain of the Alpine tribes partly in B. C. 89, partly by Augustus. Among those so attached to neighbouring municipia at the earlier date (they are not included in the list of the Tropaea Alpium, No. 31, cf. Plin. H. N. 3. 13S) were the tribes mentioned in the present document, and it appears that the civilizing effects of the system were very marked in their case. While it was the rule that the attribnti should be a grade below the governing mnnicipinm in political rights (hence after the Transpadane towns received Roman citizen- ship from Caesar the Anauni, &c., probably became iiiris Latini), the social connection of these tribes with Tridentum became so close that the legal distinction between them be- came practically obsolete, and individuals at least, acted as if the loca attributa to which they belonged formed part of the tcn'itoriuni of Tridentum and they themselves were citizens of the iiiunicipium and consequently shared its full political privileges (1. 31). This process of informal unification had an interest for the department of the Fiscus, for though the attribnti paid their local rates to the iminicipiwn (cf. C.I.L. V. 532. 2. 12= W. 693 : [of the Carni and Catali in relation to Tergeste] qui erant tantiini in reditu pecuniario) and were therefore outside its sphere, it seems that portions of these tribes had never been included in the original attributio (1. 24) and consequently, as conquered territory, formed part of the domain of Caesar and could be dealt with by the Imperial officials. It was important therefore in view of the general effacement of the original legal and territorial distinctions in these parts, to ascertain clearly what belonged to the municipia and what to Caesar. In the case of Comum an investigation of the kind had been begun as far back as Tiberius (1. 7), but 102 II.— TIBERIUS TO VESPASIAN. under Claudius the question was raised in the interest of the Fiscus by an information laid by Camurius Statutus (II. 14, 1'^., and an official inquiry directed to be held by a special commissioner assisted by the Procurators of the Imperial domains in North Italy (11. i6-j8 the procurator Raetiae is probably included. Mommsen, 1. c. inf.). Of the details of the decision to which they came we are not informed (11. 18-21). But in the course of the investigation of the question be- tween the Fiscus and the mwiicipumi, it had been necessary to inquire into the status of the tribes dependent on Triden- tum, and the result had been to affirm the almost forgotten fact that they were attribtiti and not cives ituuiicipii. That fact did not affect their independence of the Fiscus, which could only make good its claims in the case of those proved to be not attrilniti at all ; but it still remained a question how the persons who had acted on the false assumption that they were citizens of Tridentum, were to be treated. Claudius answers this by ratifying the assumed status and thereby abolishing the political consequences of the attribntio. The system therefore has here produced its full result, and the Anauni who began their connection with Rome as a con- quered tribe with the rights of peregrini, have become, first by popular recognition, and then in the eye of the law, full Roman citizens. In the document itself the following points may be noticed. The frequent use of the edictum by Claudius is noticed by Suetonius {CI. 16 : wio die XX edicta proposuit). No. 82 is another instance. 1. 2. practorimn is correctly used of any residence of the Imperator, and hence it comes to mean the quarters of the Guards who are always in attendance on him (1. 31). But the use of the name here for the Imperial Villa at Baiae is cer- tainly the beginning of the transition to its more general meaning which was established before the end of the century (Statins, Silv. i. 3. 25). Cf. also No. 92. 10. ///. THE AERARIUM AND THE F ISC US. 103 11. II, 12. For similar reflections on his predecessors, cf. No. 72, and esp. in the letter to the praefectiis Aegypti about the Jews given by Joscphus {Ajit. 19. 5. 2) : lia t&v TaCov KaLo-apo'i ^povoctv Tov hia TTjv iroWijv airovoiav kul T:apacf)po(ruvr]v . . , TaTT€iv(o- cravTos avTov^. 1. 16. Amicus and comes are both technical expressions, the former implying merely the right of access to the presence of the Emperor, while the comes is an amicus selected to accompany the Emperor when he leaves Italy and receiving a fixed viaticum while his attendance lasts. (Suet. Tib. 46). Julius Planta had probably acted in this capacity during the expedition of Claudius to Britain [St. R. ii. 834-836). 1. 31. The fact that natives of the districts round Triden- tum served in the Guards shows that by the time of Claudius they were no longer solely recruited from the places men- tioned in Tacitus, Ann. 4. 5. 5- Henceforward the Guards were distinguished by being a force of Italians. (For later exten- sions, cf. Dio Cass. 74. 2. 4). For instances of Praetorians from the Anauni^ cf. C. I. L. v. 5C71, 5072. 1. '>^'>^. Just as with the service in the Guards, so the qualifi- cation for appearing in the album iudicnm was at this period Italian birth. Cf. Plin. H. N. o^"^. 30 : (under Augustus) non- diim provinciis ad Jioc mnmis admissis. Cf. Suet. CI. 16. Mommsen, Hermes, iv. (1870), 99. III. THE AERARIUM AND THE FISCUS. Reform in the administration of the Aerarium : A. D. 44. 80. C. I. L. vi. 1403. From the city of Rome. The original is no longer in existence. 1. i : Vol{tinia) {tribu). t • ^^MITIO • T • F • VOL • DECIDIO Hi V I R O • C A P I T A L I I04 II.— TIBERIUS TO VESPASIAN. electa a ti • clavdio • caesare augnsTO ' GERMANICO • QVI • PRIMVj 5 qjmesTOR • PER • TRIENNIVM • CITRA SOrteU ' PRAEESSET • AERARIO • SATVRNI PRAETORl 8i. C. I. L. vi. 916 (cf. St. R. ii. 558, note 3). Preserved by the Anonymus Einsiedlensis (see No. 34), who saw it ' in Capitolio.' The date is a. d. 46. 1. 7 ; fac'\iendum) curiavit). TI • CLAVDIVS • DRVSI • F • CAESAR • AVG GERMANICVS • PONTIF • MAX TRIE • POTEST • V • COS • III • DESIG • IIII • IMP • X • P • P EX • S • C 5 per C • CALPETANVM • RANTIVM • SEDATVM • METRONIVM M • PETRONIVM • LVRCONEM • T • SATRIVM • DECIANVM CVRATOR^S • TABVLARIORVM • PVBLICORVM • FAC • CVR The changes which had taken place in the administration of the Aerarium from the foundation of the Principate up to A. D. ^6 are summarized by Tacitus, Ann. 13. 39. Claudius though not the author of the form which it finally received, was nevertheless responsible for the innovation which was decisive for placing the control in the hands of the Emperor. It is true that from the first the resources of the Aerarium must practically have been as much at the Emperor's disposal as those of the Fiscus (Dio Cass. ^'^. 16 : Ao'yw \viv yap to, SrjfxoVta aTTo tS>v iKeivov aTreneKpLTO, ^py\Q\07icni poptdi romani rcdcgerit 87. Cohen, i. p. 252, No. 17. Eckhel, vi. 240. Aureus of a. d 46. Obv. TI. CLAVD. CAESAR AVG. P. M. TR. P. VI IMP. XI, Head of Claudius. Rev. Triumphal arch on which is inscribed : DE BRITANN(z>). This inscription belongs to the triumphal arch erected at Rome to commemorate the expedition of Claudius to Britain in A. D. 43. Dio Cass. 60. 22 : a\//-t8as Tpo7Tai,o(f)6povs, ti]v fxkv kv ry TToKeL ti]v be ev tt] TaXaTia, odev e? ti)V BperravLav i^avaxdels k-nepamdr], yeveadat i-^rjcpiaavTo. The coin No. 87, which illus- trates the same event, represents an arch of a different type, and is some years earlier than the structure to which No. 86 belonged which was not completed before A.D. 51. By that time Caratacus has been made a prisoner. His brothers /// dcditionem accepti (Tac. Ann. 12. 35. 7) are no doubt in- J 12 II.— TIBERIUS TO VESPASIAN. eluded among the XI rcgcs. The conjectural restoration trans Oceamiin in 1. 8 is made probable by the emphasis which was laid at the time on this aspect of the expedition (Suet. Cl.i']: navalcm coronamfastigio Palatinae dovms hixta civicani fixit, traiecti ct quasi doniiti Occani insigne). The conquest of Britain was the first important departure from the policy laid down by Augustus coercendi intra ter- minos imperii (Tac. Ann. i. ii. 7)> a policy largely dictated by financial considerations (cf Strabo, 2. 5. 8, p. 115, 4. 5. 3, p. 200 : Tov\a)(i(TTOv [ikv yap kvbs Tayixaros Xpj]Coi, hv koL t7nrt/cou Tivos). As such it proportionately impressed the Empire at large, and we have an indication of the interest aroused by the event in the fact that about the same time an arch (probably a copy of the one at Rome) was erected at Cyzicus in honour of Claudius as devi\ctori regum Xr\ Britan?nae. C. I. L. iii. Sjippl. 7061, vi. p. 841. Mommsen, Provinces, ch. v. and esp. ch. v. on the Conquest of Britain in the Introduction to vol. ii. of Mr. Furneaux's Tacitus. Roads in Dalmatia. 88. C. I. L. iii. 3198. Siippl. 10156. On two fragments built into the cathedral at Spalato. The date is a.d. 16-17. {a) ii. <:AESAR • dIvi • AVGVSTi • F aUgVSTVS ' IMP • PONT • MAX • trib. POTEST • XIIX • COS • n • via7n A COLONIA saloniTan^ WVNIT virT [b) et idem viam"? mimlT AD SZmiMYM montem dItionvm VLCIRVM PER MILLIA PASSVVM A-SALONlSLXXVIID stC P . DOLABELLA LEG PRO PR TV. THE FRONTTERS AND PROVTNCES. 113 89. C. I. L. iii. 3201. Stippl. 10159. In the same place as the last. The date is A. D. 19-20. In 1. 4 the beginning of the name of the castellum may be Lip. or Lib. In II. 7, 8, the highly probable suggestions of Bulie mentioned in C.I. L. iii. Suppl. have been adopted. tTAESAR • DIVI • AVGVSTI • F ««GVSTVS • IMP • PONTiF • MAX TRIB • POTEST • XXI • ^OS ill VIAM-A • SALONiS AD HE(?) ^ASTEL 5 DAESITIATIVM PER ml. passYYM cLvi • MVNIT eT • Idem • viam ad BAsanU{?)^/(ME^ QVOD DiviDiT Bisttiates a DitiojilBYS A • SALON Is • MYNitper mt/lia pasSYYM 10 cLviii On the suppression of the general rising in Illyricum (a. d. 6-9) the province was divided, and the southern portion or Dalmatia, the official title of which before the Flavian period seems to have been Illyricum Superius (compare C. I. L. iii. 1 741 = [F. 1 1 26 in honour of Dolabella, the legatus of No. 88, by the civitatcs siiperioris provinciae Hillyrici, with 4013, under Domitian, the earliest instance in an inscription o{ legatus pro praetore p7-ovi7iciae Delmatiac), although not a frontier pro- vince, received, like Hispania Citerior and for the same reason, a garrison of two legions (Tac. Ann. 4. 5. 5) num- bered VII and XI. For the natural difficulties which stood in the way of the spread of Roman civilisation in the interior, see Mommsen, Provinces, i. 203. Nevertheless the submission of the country was so far secured, that before A. D. 66 the garrison was reduced to one legion (Josephus, B. J. 2. 16. 4: AaXfxaTai . . . vvv ov^ ^' ^vi. Tayfj.aTL ' Pco/iatcoi' rjavx^cav ayovatv ; The Seventh Legion was sent to Mocsia), and under Ves- pasian dispensed with altogether. To this end the action of Tiberius in carrying the roads, to which Nos. 88 and 89 refer, into the uncivilised eastern districts must have contributed I 114 II.— TIBERIUS TO VESPASIAN. (compare his similar activity in the North- West of Spain). It will be noticed that the latter are still in the tribal stage of organisation, with castclla as centres of the gcntcs or civitates (No. H9. 4). The localities mentioned cannot be identified with certainty, but it is clear from the distances that the roads penetrated to the regions bordering on Moesia, important for their mines. Archaeologia, 49. (1885), A. J. Evans, Antiquarian Researches in Illyricunt, esp. pp. 1-14. Moesia under Tiberius. go- C. I. L. V. 1838. On a bronze tablet found at Zuglio (lulium Carnicum), and now in the Museum at Cividale. Apparently C. Baebius Atticus became a magistrate in his native town (lulium Carnicum belonged to the Claudian tribe), and a statue was erected to him there (of. analogous case, No. 100) by one of the com- munities subject to him as Procurator of Noricum. After passing from the post of highest centurion to the equestrian service he receives a second time the rank of primus pilus on the conclusion of the first part of that career (the niilitiac equestrcs) in order that before proceeding to the higher part (the procuratclae, &c. 1 he may obtain the advantages (esp. pecuniary) which belonged to the first centurion on his discharge (Mommsen on C. I L. v. 867 ; and cf. H. Karbe, Disseii. Halenses, iv. 4i8\ For the praeniia cf. Suet. Cal. 44 : plerisque centurionum . . . prinios pilos adeniit . . . comtnoda cmeriiae militiae ad sesce)itorimi milium summam recidit. C . BAEBIO • P • F • CLA ATTICO nVIR • I • d ' PRIMOPIL LEG • V • MACEDONIC • PRAEF 5 C/VITATIVM • MOESIAE • ET TREBALLIA^ • /rrtEF • <:zVITAT IN • ALPIB • MARITVMIS • Tr • MIL • COH Vm • PR • PRIMOPIL • ITER • PROCVRATOR TI • CLAVDI • CAESARIS • AVG • GERMANICI 10 IN NORICO CIVITAS SAEVATVM • ET • LAIANCORVM C. Baehio P. f. Cla{udia) {tribal) Attico, II vir{o) i{ure) / V. THE FR ON TIERS AND PRO VINCES. 1 1 5 \d{icutido)\ priinopil{p) leg{ionis) V Macedonic{ae), praef{ccto) c\{\vitatiuvt Moesiae et Treballia\e\, \pra\cf[ectd) \c{\vitat[m}n) in Alpib{ns) Marittimis, t\i'[ibiino)\ inil{itiim) coJi{ortis) VIII pr[ae/oriae), priuiopilip) itci-[uin), proairator{i) Ti. Claiidi Caesar is A7ig{iisti) Gcrnianici in Norico, civitas Saevatum et Laiancorum. 91. C /. L. iii. 1698. One of three similar inscriptions cut in the rock by the side of the Roman road near Boljetin in Servia, on the south bank of the Danube, close to the Iron Gates, The date is a. d. 33-34. TI . CAESARE • AVG F AVGVSTO • IMPERATOR PONT MAX • TR • POT • XXXV LEG • Im • SCYt • LEG • V MACED Before the time of Claudius the frontier of the lower Dan-ube was divided between the province of Moesia and the kingdom of Thrace. For the latter, see No. 92. Moesia was conquered as early as B.C. 29 (Dio Cass. 51. 23-27). The first mention of a legatus is in A. D. 6, Dio Cass. ^^. 29. 3 ; but No. 90 is an indication that in the time of Tiberius (under whom the praefectura of 11. 4-6 would probably come) the organisation of the province was still in the rudimentary stage and that it was necessary for special reasons to place these native communities within the province under a prae- fectus. Cf. p. 39, for similar cases, to which may be added C. I. L. ix. 2564: . . . Marcelli [centiirionis^ leg. XI Cl\aud. pj'laef. civitatis Maeze\iorm}{\. 5363 : L. Volcacio Primo pracf. Coh. I Noricor. in Pann{pnia), praef. ripac Dann^ii ct civitatinm diiar{tini) Boior{nni) et Azalio7-{iivi). No. 91 relates to the construction of the military road which connected the stations along the right bank of the Danube. The head- quarters of the two legions (IV Scythica, V Macedonica, 1. 4) which then formed the garrison of the province are unknown. Mommsen, Provinces, i. 213 and note. I 2 ii6 II.— TIBERIUS TO VESPASIAN. The Province of Thrace under Claudius and Nero. 92. C. I. L. iii. 6123. Found in a village at the foot of the southern slope of the Haemus, north of Philippopolis. The date is a. d. 61. In the first line the name of Nero seems to have been erased after his death. n e r o c I a 7i d i 7i s DIVI • CLAVDI • F GERM • CAESARIS • N • TI • CAESARIS • AVG • 5 FRON ■ DIVI • AVG • ABN CAESAR • AVG • GERM PONTIF • MAX • TRIE • POT vm • IMP • vTn • COS • iiii P • P 10 TABERNAS • ET • PRAETORIA PER • VIAS • MILITARES FIERI • IVSSIT • PER TI • ZVLIVM • ZVSTVM • PROC PROVINCIAE • THRAC The task of defending the lower Danube frontier was originally divided between the governor of the province of Moesia for the western part, and the vassal princes of Thrace for the eastern (cf Tac. Ann. 2. 6^. 5 : [R/icscnports] bellnin adversus Bastarnas Scythasqiie praetendens 7iovis pedituin et equitmn copiis sese firmabat). After Claudius, on the occasion of the murder of the last king Rhoemetalces in A. D. 46, had completed the process of annexation begun by Tiberius in A. D. 19 (Tac. Ann. 2. 67. 4), Thrace was constituted as a province of the second class under a Procurator (1. 13). Ap- parently soon after, a system of military roads was laid out (1. 11), mainly no doubt with a view to the consolidation of Roman rule among a people which had made desperate efforts for independence (Tac. Ann. 3. 38. 4 sqq., 4. 46, Syn- / V. THE FR ON TIERS AND PRO VINCES. 1 1 7 cellus, p. 631, ed. Boim: KAavSto? . . . Ke'Arous koX Bperari^ows OTrAois ivbpeLcas {niriy6.y€T0, 6/xoia)S Kol QpqKas, avaipeO^vros avTutv Tov /Sao-iAecos 'PDju?;raAKou vtto r?Js iStas yaixeTrjs. The latter war is no doubt referred to by Tacitus, A;i;i. 12. 63. 3, where he speaks of the people of Byzantium in A. D. ^^ as Thraecio . . . del/o recens fcssos. C. I. L. ii. 3272, quoted on p. 1 1 9, belongs to this time). No. 92 relates to the completion of this work under Nero by the erection of resting-places for ordinary soldiers, &c. {tahernae) as well as for State officials [praetoria\ and points generally to a more settled state of things. Cer- tainly shortly after this date a comparatively small force was sufficient to preserve order in the country. (Josephus, B. J. 2. 16. 4: [speech of Agrippa in A. D. 66] rt h\ QpaKes ; . . . . ov)(^L 8to-)(tAtots 'Pwjuatoji' vTraKovovat (ppovpols ;) It must be remembered however that the legions of Moesia were close at hand. For the relation of Thrace to the superior province cf. Tac. Hist. i. it. 3 : Thraecia et quae aliae procuratoribus cokibeiitur, lit aiiqtie exei'citid vicinae ^ ita in favorent attt odium contactii valentiomvi agebantiir. Mommsen, Provinces, i. 209 sqq. esp. 212. Mommsen in Ephemeris Epigraphica, ii. 256-258. Roman Rule beyond the Danube luider Nero. 93- C. I. L. xiv. 3608. On the mausoleum of the Plautii which stands by the side of the Via Tiburtina near the bridge over the Aiiio. Various grammatical errors in the original have been corrected in the text here given. Ti. Plautio M. f. Ani(ensi) (tribu) Silvano Aeliano, pontif(ici), sodali Aug(ustali), III vir(o) a(uro) a(rgento) a(ere) f(lando) f(eriundo), q(uaestori) Ti. Caesaris, 5 legat(o) leg(ionis) V in Germania, pr(aetori) urb(ano), legat(o) et comiti Claud(ii) ii8 II.— TIBERIUS TO VESPASIAN. Caesaris in Brittannia, consuli, procos. Asiae, lcgat(o) pro praet(ore) Moesiae, In qua plura quam centum mill(ia) 10 ex numero Transdanuvianor(um) ad praestanda tributa cum coniugib(us) ac liberis et principibus aut regibus suis transduxit. Motum orientem Sarmatar(um) compressit, quamvis partem magnam exercitus 15 ad expeditionem in Armeniam misisset. Ignotos ante aut infensos p(opulo) R(omano) reges signa Romana adoraturos in ripam quam tuebatur perduxit. Regibus Bastarnarum et Rhoxolanorum filios, Dacorum fratres 20 captos aut hostibus ereptos remisit ; ab aliquis eorum opsides accepit ; per quae pacem provinciae et confirmavit et protulit ; Scytharum quoque rege a Cherronensi, quae est ultra Borustenen, opsidione summoto. 25 Primus ex ea provincia magno tritici modo annonam p(opuli) R(omani) adlevavit. Hunc legatum in Hispaniam ad praefectur(am) urbis remissum senatus in praefectura triumphalibus ornamentis honoravit, auctore imp. 30 Caesare Augusto Vespasiano, verbis ex oratione eius q(uae) i(nfra) s(cripta) s(unt) : Moesiae ita praefuit, ut non debuerit in me differri honor triumphalium eius ornamentorum ; nisi quod latior ei 35 contigit mora titulus praefecto urbis. Hunc in eadem praefectura urbis imp. Caesar Aug. Vespasianus iterum co(n)s(ulem) fecit. The principal fact which we learn from the somewhat con- fused statements of this inscription, is the extension of Roman rule over the northern shores of the Black Sea which took / V. THE FR ON TIERS AND PRO I 'INCES. 1 1 9 place under Nero. The various operations recorded are given in geographical (and therefore not necessarily chronological) order from West to East, the Sarmatae (1. 13) affecting rather the middle Danube (cf. the locality of the Suebo-Sarmatian war of Domitian in which the lazyges in the region of the Theiss took part ; Dio Cass. 67. 5. 2), while the Bastarnae and Rhoxolani (1. 18) belong to the district north-west of the Black Sea. "The last part of the narrative (1. 23) refers to the Tauric Chersonnese, where the free Greek city Heraclea Chersonesus (Sebastopol) had it seems been besieged by the Scythians. The Roman interference here referred to must have resulted in a Romcui occupation, for in A. D. 66 the Crimea and the neighbouring parts were regarded as a subject country and held by a Roman garrison (speech of Agrippa in Josephus, B. y. 2. 16. 4 : tL Set Xiyeiv ... to tow Tavpoiv (pvkov, BocriTOfjavovs re koI TrepioLKa tov YIovtov Kal rys MatwrtSo? eOvT] vvv Vi Tpi(Tyj.\ioi^ OTrXtTaLS VTroTcia-creTai, Kcd rea-orapaKOVTa vijes p^aKpal ti]v irplv aiTkcoTov kul aypiav €lpr]revoV(TL Oakacraav). It was in A. D. 63 that Nero deposed Cotys and annexed the client kingdom of the Bosporus (in that year its coins become purely Imperial and omit all reference to the native rulers ; Sallet, ZcitscJirift f. Nnmismatik^ iv. (1877), 304), and this probably settles the date of the expedition of Plautius Sil- vanus, for, as has been shown by Domaszewski (1. c. infr.), the statement about the reduction of the army of Moesia in 1. 14 refers to the transference of the Fifth Legion to the East about A. D. 62 (Tac. Ann. 15. 6. 5 : qtiae reccns e Moesis excita crai) whither it had been preceded by the other legion of Moesia in A. D. 55 (Tac. Ann. 13. 7), so that the repulse of the Sarmatians cannot have taken place before that year and was carried out, together with the occupation of the Crimea, by means of the Eighth Legion which had been moved to Moesia at the time of the conquest of Thrace in A. D. 46, and remained there till the end of Nero's reign [C. I. L. ii. 3272 = W. 1626 a: [Q. Cor\nciio Valcriano . . . praef{ecto) vcxillari- 120 II.— TIBERIUS TO VESPASIAN. oruni in Trac/iia X V \a. lcg[ione) II II Scythica (?) a legiione) V Macc\donica a legiione) VIII Angnsta &^c. staUiis coroni\s donato, (S-r.]. Mommsen, Eph. Epigj'. ii. 259, note 2. Doma- szewski, 1. c. infr. p. 211. Hence the objection that in A. D. 62 not a part but the whole of the Moesian army had been sent away falls to the ground. Cf. W. 1. p. 369, H, Dessau on C. I. L. xiv. 3608). The fact that the Roman era of the city of Tyra began in A. D. 57 [C. I. L. iii. 781, 1. 44. Bruns, Pontes., p. 230) must have some relation to these events, and may show that the submission of the Bastamae (11. 18-22) took place at that time, and the advance beyond the Borys- thenes about five years later. Plautius probably became Proconsul of Asia (1. 8) in succession to lunius Silanus who died during his tenure of that province in A. D, 54 (Tac. Ann. 13. 1), and would in that case have entered on his command in Moesia in A. D. ^^. H. Dessau in C /. L. xiv. 394. A. V. Domaszewski, Die Dislocation des romischen Hceres in Jahre 66 n. Chr., Rheinisches Museum, xlvii. (1892), 208-213. Growth of To\\rns beside the Frontier Camps. The Canabae. 94. C. I. L. V. 5747. In the Church of S. Maurizio at Monza. 1. 2 : Oufrntina) itribu). C • SERTORIVS • L • F OVF • TE VS VETERANVS • LEG • XVI CVRATOR • CIVIVM • ROA\N^r MOGONTIACI This inscription, which cannot be much later than the time of Nero when the Sixteenth Legion was transferred to Lower Germany (Tac. Hist. i. ^^. 2, cf. Ann. i. 37. 4), is one of the earliest pieces of evidence we possess about the organisation / V. THE FR ON TIERS AND PRO VI NC ES. 121 of the settlements which grew up beside the fixed quarters of the legions especially on the Rhine and Danube frontiers. The civcs Romani here mentioned are ncgotiatorcs and others, attracted to the camp at Mainz, partly to supply the wants of a large stationary body of soldiers, partly in order to traffic under their protection with the neighbouring provincials or barbarians. The importance sometimes attained by these settlements is shown by the description given by Tacitus of that at Vetera in A. d. 69 [Hist. 4. 22): longae pads opera haud proctd castris in modinii mnnicipii exstriicta. Such communities would as time went on require an independent organisation. It will be noticed that the quasi-magistrate of No. 94 (cf. sumnias awator c{ivinni) R{pmanoruin) provinc{iac) Ltigidunensis), W. 2224) is a veteran ; and in the case of most of these settlements, veterans, not provided for elsewhere by a dediictio, form an important element. As early as the time of Augustus or Tiberius we hear of communities of veterans under a curator {C. 1. L.v. 5832 : P. Tutilius P. f. 0\7tfJ\ veteranus . . . curator vete\i'an{priini)\. He died A. D. 29), and hence it is natural to find these composite commu- nities outside the Legionary camps organised under a similar official. Owing to their origin as centres of trade, these places became known as canabac, from the popular name of a shed or warehouse of more or less temporary character (cf. W. 2230, 2506, inscriptions of curatores corporis ncgotiatorum vinariorum Lttgudwii in kanabis consistentiiim. ' Canova,' the representative of canaba in Italian, is used for a wine-cellar. See De Vit's Forcellini, for other illustrations, and cf. in the inscription referred to p. 31, C.I.L. vi. 1585: impcnsa de casidis item cannabis et aedificiis ido7icis). The organisation of the Canabae, which were called not by any local name but by that of the legion with which they were connected, con- sisted of the curator (whose full title would be curator vetera- nornm et civinni Romanornm qui consistimt ad canabas le- gionis), subordinate officials {q?eacstor and actor: for Mainz, 122 TL— TIBERIUS TO VESPASIAN. cf. W . 2262, 2263), and an ordo of deairiones (for Mainz, cf. W. 2265, 2266). The curator was apparently elected [C. I. L. iii. 2733= W. 1492 from Aequum in Dalmatia : Sex. lul^lins] . . . Silvaujis^stimuiiis c\7irator c^ivhivi) R{omanor7ivi)\s7ijfragio \yetcranor{7iui) ?] leg{ionis) VII, Qr^c). The community at Mainz was singularly late in receiving municipal rights (not before Diocletian). Most of the Canabae were converted into uninicipia or colojiiae before the third century, in the earlier cases on the occasion of the moving of the legion, but from the time of Trajan onwards the new town often existed by the side of the military quarters (e. g. Carnuntum, which j^ mie a municipitnn under I -.idrian. was the station of the F\.^i'teenth Legion from the second to the fourth century, CI. L. iii. 550). The transition from the Canabae to the full municipal organisation was formed by a constitution of a purely civil type analogous to that of the pagus or vicus, under magistri (e.g. C. I. L. iii. 6166). Mommsen, Hermes, vii. (1873), 299. E Kornemann, De civibits Romaiiis in provinciis imperii consisteittibns. Berlin, 1892, 80 sqq. (» IV. THE FRONTIERS AND PROVINCES. 123 bo -a S ° cu ■a g, >.-u O 3 aHAO sAiowx v3HcnaaviiHd CC ,g b H in s. IS i?; 3 u u tn 3 WD tn 1) ;_ rt s lU t« in _3 ^ 1) cs 'C j:J d, 1) 1) as in H 1 (U 5 tn c d CO S ^2 c: .2 fl en > ^ ^ ,. tn in 2 rt CJ D ^ ■> C o " =^ 1- -S Ti d T3 ^ ^ S -5 w § ii ^ ^ g g ^ ^- -r ■" .2 S ^ «, g & C ^ ^"-s C/3 tn Oh '^ .s o o Sj- S S" 3 t. c ■" ■=*• •r! ^ jG g -o 3 " x) ^ 1-^ T, U HJ ny u " -a >- .5 1- 3 C 3 5i 12; o •2 g fS ^ ^ ^'^ § > in 3 -" -^ 1^ t" ^ O 0) 3 D !-'< o> is> ■n r- o b. . ^ M-i 3 o e "■^ -^ tn r^ . • ^•::uep>2l5 III U2 o •£ -3 ~ Fl MOSTENE acgX^ /-/V/WAESAREA 124 n.— TIBERIUS TO VESPASIAN. 96. Cohen, i. 189, No. 3. Eckhel, vi. 192. Large bronze of a.d. 22. Obverse. TI. CAESAR DIVI AVG. F. AVGVST. p. M. TR. POT. XXIII round s. c. Reverse. CIVITATIBVS ASIAE RESTITVTIS. Seated figure of Tiberius. The earthquake of A.D. 17 which ruined twelve cities of Asia (Tac. Ann. 2. 47. Plin. H. N. 2. 200 : maximiis tei^rae memoria mortalinm inotus), was followed by another in A. D. 23 which affected only Cibyra (Tac. Ann. 4. 13). In both cases Tiberius granted remissions of taxation, and in the first he further provided funds for the restoration. Ephesus must have suffered and been relieved in the same way about A. D. 29 or 30 (i. e. it is not mentioned in Tacitus who is complete up to a.d. 29, Ann. 5. 5, but its name occurs on this monument of A.D. 30). In A.D. 22 a monument was erected at Rome by the restored cities of Asia in gratitude to Tiberius (No. 96), which is thus described by Phlegon Trallianus {Fr. 42 in Muller, Frag. Hist. Graec. iii) : avQ' Siv KoXoaaov re avT<2 Karaa-Kevdaavres avi9e(rav irapa rw tt/s 'A(f)po- bCrris lepw o eorty ev rfj 'Pco/xatcoi' ayopq koI tG>v irok^cov eKCKTTrjs ((pe^ijs avhpidvTa^ TrapiaTrja-av {C. I. G. 3450 from Sardis is perhaps part of the decree of the towns relating to its erection. Cibyra is included). It was no doubt after this model that the Augustales of Puteoli erected the monument to which No. 95 belongs, and apparently on the occasion of the Em- peror's liberality to Ephesus. Their action is explained by the fact that Puteoli was, in the last centuries of the Republic and the first of the Empire, the great Italian port for the trade of the Mediterranean (Statins, Silv. 3. 5. 75 : litora inundi Jiospita) and especially of its eastern half. For special references to a connection between Puteoli and the province IV. THE FRONTIERS AND PROVINCES, 125 of Asia, cf. C.I. L. x. 1797, dedication to L. Calpurnius Capi- tolinus (cf. No. 44) by the mercatores qui Alexandr{iai) Asiai Syriai ncgotianttir, and the epitaphs there of persons who had come from the West of Asia Minor, collected in Beloch, Campanien^ pp. 121, 122 (e.g. i78 = Kaibel, Inscr. Grace. Sic. et Ital. 847 : Ko'aros" KaA.Trovpi'tos 'Po{;rvi ASPRENAS COS PR 5 COS VII VIR EPVL^ NVM VIAM EX CAST HIBERNIS TACAPES MVNIENDAM CVRAVIT LEG • in . AVG • CI The road to which this milestone belonged must have been finished by Asprenas (Tac. Aim. i. ^'3,. 9} in the first days of the reign of Tiberius. Augustus died on Aug. 19th (Suet. Ateg. 128 II.— TIBERIUS TO VESPASIAN. loo), and his consecration took place on Sept. 17th [C. I. L. i. p. 324: Fasti Amiterjiini, for that day: Fer{iae) ex s.c. q{iwd) e{o) d{ie) divo Ajignsto honor es caelestes a senatti de- creti), but as he is not here called divtis, the inscription must have been put up between the two dates, or rather, before Asprenas had received information of the latter event. The inscription assumes that Tiberius would retain the (hereditary) praenomen iinperatoris, wWxch. as a matter of fact he renounced (Suet. Tib. 26), and which is very rarely found in his in- scriptions. The real importance however of this inscription is due to the light which it throws on military arrangements in Africa under Augustus and his immediate successors. It shows that before A. D. 14 the headquarters of the African legion had been already fixed at the foot of the northern slope of the Mons Aurasius where they remained for more than two centuries. Only two milestones of the road which connected them with the eastern coast have been discovered, but the numbers on these, though mutilated (in 10018 found at Tacapae the number was under CC but over CLX), make it clear that the starting-point of the road, and therefore the headquarters themselves, were at Theveste, which is in round numbers 200 miles distant from Tacapae, and moreover the general centre of the road-system of this part of Africa in the first century {C. I. L. viii. p. 859). An additional piece of evidence in favour of Theveste is the similar road made by the legion under Trajan to connect it with the north coast at Hippo Regius [C. I. L. viii. 10037). It was therefore a relatively small change when Hadrian moved the headquarters from the eastern end of the Aurasius range to the western at Lam- baesis. But it must be remembered that by that time the Roman frontier ran along the southern base of the range, whereas under Tiberius the legion at Theveste must have confronted the mountains as the stronghold of Tacfarinas and the Musulamii who are described as living vno to Avbov opos IV. THE FRONTIERS AND PROVINCES. 139 (Ptol. 4. 3. 24) and apparently on the side which faced the Sahara (Tac. Ann. 2. 52. 3 : solitudinibus Africae propinqiid). C. I. L. viii. xxi, 859, 860. Cagnat, L'Arnte'e Romaine (TAfrique, 497 sqq. The Command of the African Legion taken from the Proconsul. 99. C. /. L. viii. Suppl. 14603. Epitaph from the site of Simitthus (Africa Pro- consularis). For hostetn in 1. 7 cf. C. I. L. viii. 4333: in civitatem sua. 9381: ex Gerntania snperiorem. L • FLAMINIVS • D • F • ARN MIL • LEG • HI • AVG 7 • IVLI • LONGI • DILECTO LECTVS . AB • M • SILANO • MIL 5 ANNIS • XIX • IN • PRAESIDIO VT • ESSET • IN • SALTO • PHILOiVV SIANO • AB • HOSTEM • IN • PVGN OCCISSVS • VIXIT • PIE ANNIS XL 10 H • S • E L. Flaminius D{ecimi) f. Arn{ensi) {tribti), mil{es) Icgiionis) III Ang{ustae){cetiiuria) lull Longi, dilecto Icctus ab M. Silano, mil{itavit) annis XIX in praesidio lit esset in Salto Philomu- siano, ab hostem in ptigna occissus. Vixit pie annis XL. H{ic) s{itus) e{st). This inscription illustrates the state of things with regard to the military command in Africa after the change made by Gaius. That change is described by Tacitus [Hist. 4. 48) : legio in Africa anxiliaque tntandis imperii finibus sub divo Augnsto Tiber ioqiie principibus proconsuli patcbant. mox C. Caesar turbidus animi et Marcnm Silamun obtiiientem Afri- cam (a.d. 32-38) metuejis, ablatani proconsidi legionem misso in eatn rem legato tradidit. aeqi/atus inter duos bencficiorum K 130 IT.— TIBERIUS TO VESPASIAN. mimerus, et mixtis titriusque mandatis discordia qiiaesita aiic- taque pravo ccrtamine. L. Flaminius (probably a native of Carthage, which belonged to the tribus Arnensis : EpJi. Epigr. iv. 537) entered the Third Legion while the Proconsul still held the command and levied his own troops. It was soon after the accession of Gains (a. D. 37), and probably at the time when Silanus was replaced by L. Piso (a. D. 38), that the change was made, for Dio Cassius (59. 20. 7) associates it with the name of the latter. No. 99 shows that even under the new state of things the Proconsul had troops at his dis- posal, for though L. Flaminius began his service before A.D. 38 he must have been killed at the end of the reign of Claudius or the beginning of that of Nero ; and the Saltus Philomusianus was not on the frontier, but probably belonged to the upland district N. of Simitthus of which the Saltus Burunitanus formed part (C /. L. viii. 10570. Bruns, Pontes, p. 228). In the second century we know that a cohort was still detached from the legion for this service (C. /. L. viii. 2532 Ab, speech of Hadrian at Lambaesis : cohors abest quod oimiibiis annis per vices in officinm p7'-\ocons\idis mit- titiir). The Imperial legatus who was put in command of the legion was, hke the legati of the two Germanics (see p. 108), originally entrusted only with the defence of a military frontier. He differed from them, however, in being inferior in rank {2^ praetoritis) to the governor in whose province he was stationed, and in not having, at least before the end of the second century, an independent territorial sphere of action (Dio Cassius, 59. 20. 7, writes from the point of view of later times : Si^a TO e^ro? veLjxas erepw to re o-TpaTLMTLKov koI tovs voixdbas tovs irepl avTo TrpoaeTa^ev). His proper title was legatus Aiigiisti pro praetore provinciae Africae (C. I. L. viii. 2747), or legatus pro praetore exercitus Africae (C /. Z. v. 531. Cf. Tac. Hist. 4. 49 : turn legionem in Africa regebat Valerius Festus). Hence we find him regularly engaged in public works in the Pro- IV. THE FRONTIERS AND PROVINCES, 131 consular province {C. I. L. viii. 10048, road from Carthage to Theveste, made in A.D. 123 per lcg{ioneni) III Aug{tistam). P. Metilio Secundo leg. Aug. pr. pv. Contrast with this the conflict of authorities in Germany and Gaul. Tac. Ann. 13. ^"i,, esp. 4 : invidit operi Aclins Gracilis Bdgicae legatus deter- rendo Veterem ne legiones alienae provinciae inferref). It is not till the third century that his title becomes legatus Au- gnsti pro praetore provinciae Ntimidiae {C. I. L. viii. 2392). Mommsen, Ephaneris Epigraphica, iv. p. 537. Cagnat, L'Arinee Romaine d'Afrique, 30. The Roman Army in Egypt. 100. C /. E. iii. Siippl. 6809. On the pedestal of a statue erected by the city of Alexandria to the commander of the Roman army in Egypt at his native town, the colony of Antioch in Pisidia (it belonged to the Sergian tribe, cf. 1. 2) on the site of which the inscription was found. I. 5 : p[^rimo)p{ilo). 1. 16 : h{onorts) c{ausa). P • A N I C I O P ■ F ■ S ■ M AXI MO • PraefecTo CN DOMlTl AIENoBAR 5 Bl • P • P • LEG 5ai • FVLM PR.EF casTror • Leg n • avg -in BRITANNIA • PRAEF EXER CITV • QVI • EST • IN • AEGYpTo DONATO • AB • IMP • BONIS 10 MILITARIBVS • OB EXPEDI TIONEM • HONORATO CORONA • MVRALI • ET hasta • pvra • ob bellvm briTannic • civiTas 15 ALEXANDR • QVAE • EST in-aegYpto • H-C- K 2 ^^2 IL— TIBERIUS TO VESPASIAN. Under Augustus the garrison of Egypt consisted of three legions (Strabo, 17. i. 12, p. 797 : eurt 8e kox aTpaTiMTLKov rpia TayixaTa, &v to ^v Kara ti]v ttoKlv 'ibpvTaL, raXka 8' h rfj X'^Pfs thinking probably of the state of things at the time of his own visit to Egypt in B.C. 24. Mommsen, Ep/i. Epigr. v. p. 9). By the time of Tiberius it was reduced to two (Tac. Ann. 4. 5. 4), which were united in a single camp at Alexandria (Josephus, B. y. 2. 19. 8 : xa Kara ti]v ttoXlv 'Pa)ixaLu>v bvo rdy- juara). The principle of excluding Senators from the govern- ment of Egypt was extended to the command of these legions, which, as we learn from No, 100, was held not by one of the regular (senatorial) Ugati, but by an officer of purely military origin called pracfecttis exercitns qui est in Aegypto, who can be none other than t\iQ praefoctus castrorum, who would naturally be in charge of the double camp at Alexandria (Josephus, B. J. 6. 4. 3 : aTpaT07;€bdpxr]s t5>v ki: 'AXeiavbpeias bvo TayixoLTcav. Cf. Tac. Amz. I. 20. Wilmanns, £p/i. Epigr. i. p. 91)- It appears from 11. 0^-^ that Cn. Domitius Ahenobarbus (died A.D. 40, Suet. Nero, 6) the father of the Emperor Nero, was elected duumvir at Antioch, and, as was the case when persons of distinction (generally members of the Imperial family) accepted municipal magistracies, appointed as his deputy {praefectus) P. Anicius Maximus. Maximus began his military career in Syria (for the Twelfth Legion in Syria, cf. Tac. A7in. 15. 6. 5, 26. i. Mommsen, Res Gest. D. Aiig. 68, note 2), and it will be to this time that the expedition mentioned in 1. 10 belongs. After attaining the rank of first centurion of the legion (1. 5), he was sent to Britain in the invasion of A.D. 43 with the Second Legion as praefectus cas- trorum, and earned the rewards stated in 11. 11-14. He was then promoted to the command of the Roman troops in Egypt, and while there received this mark of distinction from the city of Alexandria, probably towards the end of the reign of Claudius or under Nero. GENERAL INDEX. [Numbers in ordinary type refer to pages ; in thick t3'pe to the inscriptions. The number following a full stop after an inscription number indicates the line of the inscription, e.g. 38. 7. The most important reference in each case is given first.] A. Acta principum, iusiurandum in, 86, 72. fratrum Arvalium, 66, 53, 84. Aerarium, administration of the, 104, 105. share of the, in providing corn for Rome, 31. maintenance of Imperial roads by the, 35. maintenance of aqueducts at Rome by the, 89. Africa, Roman military arrange- ments in, 128-130. Imperiallegatus in, 129-131,77. protected native communities in, 15,39- Agrippa, j\I. Vipsanius, aqueducts of, at Rome, 28, 88, 89. recognised by Gaius as his ances- tor, 71. Agrippina, the elder, married to Germanicus, 43. funeral honours paid to, by Gaius, 54, 71. Agrippina, the younger, mother of Nero, 43. Augusta, 42. makes Burrus praefectus prae- torio, 74. Alps, conquest of the, 37. political organisation of the, 38- 40, loi, 90. Amicus Caesaris, 103. AnaUNI, citizenship of the, ratified by Claudius, 101-103, 91. Andarta, Celtic divinity, 14. Annon.\, see Rome, Antioch in Pisidia, 23, 131, 132. Antgnius, Eastern Empire of, 2, 21. rehabilitation of, by Gaius, 72. Aqueducts, at Rome, of Augustus, 28. at Rome, of Claudius, 88. administration of the, 29, 89. Ara Romae et Augusti : at Lugudunum, 16, 17, 48. at Narbo, 49. at Tarraco, 49, 10. Ubiorum, 49, 108. Liburniae, 49. Ara Augusti at Narbo, 53. NuMiMS Augusti at Forum Clodii, 58. Fortunae Reducis, 38. 7, 53. Pacis Augustae, 38. II, 53. Arca Galliarum, 36, 51. Arcitectus armamentarii Im- peratoris, 77. Armenia, Roman relations with, under Augustus, 22. occupation of, under Nero, 126, 119. Army, of Africa, 128-130. of Dalmatia, 113. of Egypt, 132. of Germany, 14, 75, 79, 81, 108. of IMoesia, 117, 119, 120. of Pannonia, 19. of Spain, ic. of Syria, 126. Asia, province of. Commune, 48. 134 GENERAL INDEX. Asia, city-rivalries in, 50. earthquakes in, 124. commercial relations with Italy, 125. ASTURES, 10. Attributio, 38, 15, loi, 102. Augusta, title of, given to Livia, 68, 74. . to Agrippina, 42. Augusta Vindelicorum, 42. augustales, 46-48, 63-66, 53, 70, 95, 124, 125. Augustus, name of, 38. 10, 53. constitutional position of, 4-8, 84-87. his work in Rome, 28-31. in Italy, 33-35. in Gaul, 13. in Spain, 10. in the East, 21-23. foreign policy, 121, 21. institution of the Guards by, 96, 74- regulation of the succession by, 42-44. consecration of, 128. worship of, in Rome, 59-61. — in Italy, 56-58. — in the provinces, 47-49. B. Bat AVI, revolt of, under Civilis, 81. semi-independent position of, no. Belgica, conflict of authority be- tween legatus of, and legatus of Upper Germany, 131, 108. Berytus, 23, 23, 24. BiLBlLlS, 52, 69, 70. Bosporus, kingdom of the, an- nexed by Nero, 119. Britain, conquest of, by Claudius, III, 112, 76. 95, 103, 93. 6, 100, 132. worship of the Emperor in, 48. Burrus, Sextus Afranius, career of, 74, 75- C. Caligula, see Gaius Caesar. Campania, colonies of Augustus in, 34- worship of Augustus in, 57. Canabae, 120-122. Cantabri, 10. CaRNUNTUM, 20, 122. Carpentum, in honour of the Elder Agrippina, 71. Carthago Nova, 10, 11. Castella in Dalmatia, 89, 114. Celtic survivals in Gaul, 14, 15, 18. festival on Aug. i, 49. Censors, functions of the, passed to the Emperor, 29, 30. Census, of Augustus, 28. of Augustus in the provinces, 25. of Claudius, 90. Centurio, J^^ Primipilus, 18, 99. Civilis, Claudius, revolt of, 81. Civitas, given after service in the Fleet, 78. given to the Anauni, 79. loss of, in case of the flamen provinciae Narbonensis, 35. 17, 50. CiVlTATES (native communities in the provinces) : in the Alps, 32, 38, 39. in Dalmatia (Maezeij, 115. in Gaul, 17, 14. in Moesia, 90. in Noricum, 90. in Pannonia, 115. Classis, see Fleet. Claudius, associated with the family of Augustus, 34. 10, 42, 43- accession, 'j'},, 95. attitude towards his predecessors, 88,103. work in Rome, 88, 89. extension of the Pomerium, 90, 70. 15. conquest of Britain, in, 112. annexation of Thrace, 116. reorganisation of the Italian fleet under, 99. edicts of, 79, 82, 102. letters invented by, 73. Cohorts, auxiliary, 23, 25, 40, 41, no, 115. - praetorian, see Guards. urban, 94, 95, 61, ^l. of vigiles, see Vigiles. Colonies of Augustus, in Italy, 2,1, 34- in Pisidia, 23. Comes Caesaris, 103. Commendatio, 86. Commune, see Concilium. GENERAL INDEX. ^?>S COMPITUM, 59. COMUM, 38, 76, lOI. Concilium provinciae, 47-51, 10. CONDUCTORES PISCATUS, 85, CONSECRATIO, of Augustus, 128. Consulship, of Augustus, con- tinuous (B.C. 27-23), 5. resignation of the (B.C. 23), 6, 80. of Tiberius, 69. of Vitellius (cos. perpetuus), 80. CONTRIBUTIO, ^^^ ATTRIBUTIO. CORBULO, CN. DOMITIUS, IIO, 97, 126. Corn supply, see Rome. Corona Civica given to Augustus, 2, 4, 112. CoTTll, regnum, 40. Curatores : aquarum, 29, 30. civium Romanorum, 94, 121, 122. frumenti, 31. operum publicorum, 27, 30. riparum et alvei Tiberis, 25, 29, 30. tabularum publicarum, 81, 105, .95- viarum, 35. D. Dalmatia (Illyricum Superius), 113- Damnatio memoriae, 85, 86. Danube, frontier of the Empire, 41, 19, 20, lis, 116, 119, 121. Delos, 125. Dies imperii, 78, 87. Dispensations granted to Em- perors by the Senate, 87. Domains, Imperial, in Italy, 102. Drusus, Nero Claudius, Ger- manicus, brother of Tiberius, 33. 7, 37, 44. Drusus Iulius Caesar, son of Tiberius, 34. 2, 44,38.4,53,69. Drusus Iulius Germanicus, son of Germanicus, 34. 9, 43. Edictum, of the Emperor, 8 of Claudius, 79, 82, 102. Egypt, annexation of, 3, 21. administration of, 3, 132. Roman army in, 100, 132. Emperor, see Princeps. Empire, the Roman, frontiers of, 19, 41, no, 127, 128. extension of, 112, 11 8- 120, 90. Greek half of, 23, 47, 48. the worship of the Emperor a bond of union between the dif- ferent parts of, 47. Equestrian career, 74, 25. EVOCATI AUGUSTI, 77, 95. Euphrates, eastern frontier of the Empire, 21, 127. F. Familia, publica, 89, Caesaris, 89. Fasti Amiternini, 52, Feriarum Latinarum, 5. Praenestini, 4. Feriale Cumanum, 38, 57. Fiscus, maintenance of the Im- perial roads by the, 35. rights of the, in relation to the Anauni, loi, 102. the Vehiculatio transferred to the, 106. Flamen Dialis, 49. provinciae (sacerdos), 35, 47, 49, 50, 16, 17, 37. Augustalis (sacerdos), Augusti (municipal), 10, 15, 17, 43, 58. Fleet, at Misenum, 78, 99. at Ravenna, 99. on the Danube, 20. • Freedmen, see Libertus. Frish, 109, no, 39. Gaius Caesar (Caligula), his descent from Augustus, 43. rehabilitation of his family, 71. attitude towards his prede- cessors, 72. relations with the Senate, 80. change made by, in the military command of Africa, 129, 130. omission of his name from the lex de imperio, 85. reflections on, by Claudius, 88, 79. 12, 103, Galea, Ser. Sulpicius, his action compared with that of Macer, n- adoption of Pi so by, 42. Gallia Narbonensis, 13-15. concilium of, 35, 49, 50. 136 GENERAL INDEX. Galliae Tres, Census of the, under Augustus, 25. civitates of, 17, 14. concilium of, 48, 17, 1 8. revolt of, in a.d. 69 (Imperium Galliarum), 81. Romanisation of, 18. Genius Augusti, 59-61. Gentes, 38. in Africa, 39. Alpinae, 31. Germania, Altar of, 49, 108. Superior, Inferior, 108. political importance of the Com- mands in, 75. Germanicus, title of, in the family of Drusus, 44. assumed by Vitellius, 80, 81. Germanicus Caesar, 34. 3, 43, 38. 17, 53, 109. Guards, the Praetorian, origin of, 96. where recruited, 96, 103. camp of, 73. increase of, 94, 97. make Claudius Emperor, 95. Gutuater, 15, 18. H. Heraclea Chersonesus, 93. 23, 119. HiSPANiA CiTERlOR (Tarraco- nensis), 10, 113. concilium of, 37, 49, 10, HiSPANiA Ulterior (Baetica), 7, II. Augustales in, 46, 66. HLUDANA(dea), 85. I. ILLYRICUM, revolt of, in a.d. 6, 113. Inferius (Pannonia), 19. Superius (Dalmatia), 113. Imperator, in case of Tiberius, 98, 128. of Nero, 97. Imperium, of Augustus (consulare and proconsulare), 6, 7. lex de imperio, 70, 83-S7. Italy, state of, at the beginning of the Principate, 33. work of Augustus in, 33-35. frontier of, 37, 41. Italy, fleet of, 98. worship of Augustus and the Emperors in, 56-58. invasion of, by Vitellius, 79. lUDICES, chosen from Italians, 103. Iulia Augusta (Livia), uxor Caesaris, 34. 6. genetrix orbis, 49, 50, 68. mater patriae, 51, 68. political importance of, 68. Burrus, procurator of, 60. 5, 74. lULlA, daughter of Augustus, her descendants, 43. Lambaesis, 128, 130. Lares Augusti (Compitales), 45, 59-62. Latinum ius, conferred on Alpine tribes, 39, 40. Lex, Arae Narbonensis, 53. de Imperio Vespasiani, 70. Legions : Africa, III Aug., 98, 128, 99, 130, 65, 77. — I Macriana, 64, 77. Britain, II Aug., 100, 132. Dalmatia, VII (Claudia), 113. — XI (Claudia), 113. Egypt (III Cyrenaica, XXII Deiotariana), 132. Germany, Upper, XVI Gallica, 14, 94, 120. IV Macedonica (from Claudius), 67. XXI Rapax (from Nero), 67, 80. XXII Primigenia (from Claudius), 67. — Lower, XVI Gallica (from Nero), 77, 97, 120. Aloesia, IV Scythica, V Mace- donica, 91, 115, 120. — VII (from Nero), 113. — VIII Aug. (from Claudius), 119, 120. Pannonia, VIII Aug., IX His- pana, XV Apollinaris, 19. Spain, IV Macedonica, VI Victrix, X Gemina, 10. Syria, III Gallica, 97, 126. — VI Ferrata, 126. — XII Fulminata, 100, 132. Liberti, the Augustales chosen from, 46, 62,, 65, 66. GENERAL INDEX. ^37 LiBERTi, the magistri vicorum chosen from, 45, 6i. LiCTORS, of the Emperor, 8. of the flamen provinciae, 35. 2, 49. LiviA, see Iulia Augusta. LUCUS AUGUSTI (Gallia Narbo- nensis), 14. — (Hispania Citerior), 10. LUGUDUNUM, 17, 18, 48, 121. LusiTANiA, Census of, under Augustus, 25. Augustales in, 64. Lycia, federal assembly of, 48. M. Macer, L. Clodius, 62-65, 77. Magistri, in the Canabae, 122. Mercuriales, 66. vicorum, 45, 61, 28. Massilia (Marseilles), 13. Mines, in Dalmatia, 114. in Gaul, 18. MiNisTRi Mercurii Maiae (Au- gusti), 39-41, 57. Misenum, fleet at, 79, 99. Moesia, 115, 116. legions of, 117, 119. Moguntiacum (Mainz), 121, 122. MusuLAMii, 128. praefectus of the, 39. N. Narbonensis, see Gallia. Negotiatores, 121, 125. Nemausus (NImes), 14, 15. Nero, a descendant of Augustus, 43- use of imperator, 97. extension of Emperor's right of commendatio under (?), 86. completion of the Portus Ro- manus by, 92. reform in administration of the Aerarium, 105. thevehiculatio reimposed on Italy by, 106. gives ius Latinum to the Alpes Maritimae, 40. completion of military roads in Thrace by, 92, 117. extension of Roman Rule north of the Euxine under, 119. Armenian war, 126. Nero, conspiracy of Piso against, 94. revolt of Vindex against, 75. omission of his name from the lex de imperio, 85. Nero Iulius Caesar, son of Ger- manicus, 34. i, 43, 55, 71. NOMINATIO, 86. NoRicuM, 41, 90. 10. o. Ordo Augustalium, 65. Ornamenta, consularia, of Burrus, 60. 9. municipal, given to Augustales, 65. Ostia, 92, 93. Otho, 66, 78. Pannonia(Illyricum Inferius), 19. Parthia, relations of Augustus with, 21, 22. of Nero, 126. Patronus coloniae, 76. municipii, 27. civitatis, 60. Peregrini, 39, 99, 102. PiSIDIA, 23. POETOVIO (PeTTAU), 19. POMERIUM, 73, 90, 70. 14, 86. Pompeii, worship of Augustus at, 56, 57- worship of the Lares at, 60. PORTUS AUGUSTI (ROMANUS OS- TIENSIS), 74, 75, 92, 93, 125. PRAEFECTUS Aegypti, 103. aerarii, X04, 105. annonae, 31, 93, 105. castrorum, 100, 132. civitatium, gentium, &;c., 39, 40, no, 115. classis, 99. cohortis, 23, 25. coloniae, 15, 17, 100, 132. exercitus in Aegypto, 100, 132. fabrum, 23, 25, 16. frumenti dandi, 27, 31. pagi, 10, 11. praetorio, 60, 74. urbis, 61, 28. vehiculorum, 107. vigilum, 61, 28. 1 38 GENERAL INDEX. Praetor, Aerarii, 104, 105. in Gallic civitates, 10, 12, 14, 15. Praetorians, see Guards. Praetorium, 102. Priesthoods, see Flamen. Primipilus, primipilaris, 90, 76, 100, 39. Princeps, Principate : the constitution of, the work of Augustus, 7, 8. distinguished from the Repub- hcan Magistracies, 6, 80. powers of the, 83-87. name Augustus as belonging to, 68. coinage of the, 72, 80. servants of the, 74. iusiurandum in acta, 86, 72. succession to the, 42. control of the Aerarium, 104. — of the city of Rome, 28, 31. worship of the, 47 sqq. Princeps iuventutis, 34. 8. Princeps Sabinorum, Trumpli- NORUM, 39. Procurator Alpium, 40, 90, 93. ad annonam, 93. aquarum, 89. Augustae, 60, 74. Caesaris (Augusti), 60, 74, 25, 79. 17, 102. Norici, 41, 90. portus Ostiensis, 75, 93. Raetiae, 41, 102. Thraciae, 92, 116. Provinciae Caesaris, 3, 5. inermes, 25. procuratoriae, 117, 126 {see Pro- curator), publicani, 109. PUTEOLi, port of Rome, 92, 124, 125. worship of Augustus at, 44, 57. Augustales at, 95, 124, 64. Q. QUAESITOR JUDEX, 27. Quaestor aerarii, 80, 104, 105. Ostiensis, 93. R. Raetia, 41, 42. Ravenna, fleet at, 98, 99. Respublica restituta, 4, 96. Rhine Frontier, 108, no. Roads, in Africa, 128, 131. in Dalmatia, 113. in Italy, 35. in Moesia, 115. in Raetia, 41, 42. in Spain, 10, 11, 114. in Thrace, II 6. ROMANISATION, in Gaul, 15, 18. in Dalmatia, 113. not in the East, 23. Rome, condition of, at the begin- ning of the Principate, 28, 29, 30- work of Augustus in, 28-31. — of Claudius in, 88. regiones and vici of, 28, 59, 61. food supply of (annona), 31, 92, 93, 78, 93. 26. water supply of, 28, 88. floods in, measures against, 29, 30, 74, 93. police of, 28, 61. sea-port of, 92, 93, 125. S. Sacerdos, see Flamen. Sacramentum of the Guards, 73. Salassi, 31. conquest of the, 37, 38. Sardis, 95, 124. Seianus, L. Aelius, 52, 69, 70. Senate, the Emperor's formal re- lations with the, 8, 85. share of the, in conferring the Principate, 84, 87. attitude towards the, of Gaius, 80. — of Galba, ']']. — of Macer, T]. — of Vitellius, 80. confers honours on Livia, 68. Seviri, see Augustales. Syria, Census of, under Augustus, 25. legions of, 126. Tabularia publica at Rome, 81, 105. cura tabulari censualis (Tarra- conensis), 37, 51. Tarraco, 10, 49. Temple, of Augustus, 44, 57, 58. of Fortuna Augusta (Pompeii), 42, 57. GENERAL INDEX. 139 Temple, of Mars Ultor at Rome, 38. 16, 53. of Roma and Augustus, 35,47-49, 58. of Vesta on the Palatine, 53. restoration of temples at Rome by Augustus, 30. Thracia, 116, 117, 119. Tiber, regulation of the course of the, by Augustus, 29. new channel at Ostia made by Claudius, 74, 93. Tiberius, quaestor Ostiensis, 93. campaign in Raetia, yj. Heir Apparent of Augustus, 42, 34. 4. titles of, 98, 128. relations with Julia Augusta, 68. — with Sejanus, 69, 70. consulships of, 69. road-making under, 88, 89, 113, 114,91, 115. restores the cities of Asia, 95, 124. retirement from Rome, 79. li. Tribunicia potestas, 7, 8, 84, 85. U. Ubiorum ara, 49. V. Vasienses Vocontii, 14, 60, 74. Vehiculatio, 106. Verginius Rufus, L., 61, 75. Vergobret, 14. Vespasian, accession of, 70, 87. Vexillatio, in Britain, 95. in Italy, 67, 79. in Thrace, 119. Via Augusta (Baetica), 11. Claudia Augusta (Raetia), 33, 42. Flammia, 29, 33. 34, 35- viae militares in Thrace, 92, 116. ViGILES, 28, 61, 76. Vindex, C. Iulius, rising of, 75. VlTELLlus, curator operum pub- licorum, 31. accession of, 78. support of the Rhine army, 81, 97- invasion of Italy, 79. attitude towards the Senate, 80. increase of the Guards under, 97, 94- death of, 79. VOLCAE ArECOMICI, 12, 1 5. INDEX OF NAMES. [The names of Emperors and of members of the Imperial family will be found in the General Index. The numbers refer to the inscriptions unless it is otherwise stated. (1) = libertus. (s) = servus.] M. Aeisiilius Lepidus, 38. 2, O. Aemilius Secundus, 23. Aemilia Chia (1), 23. Sex.Afranius Burrus, 60. C. AisciDius Lepos (1), 47. P. Anicius Maximus, 100. Arrius, 40. Messius Arrius Inventus (1),40. Camillus Arruntius (cos. a. d. 32), 53. M. Arruntius, 41. C. Asinius Callus (cos. b.c. 8), 25. C. AUFILLIUS Suavis (1), 47. Gn. Munatius Aurelius Bassus, p. 25. L. Aurelius Dosso, 83. T. Aurelius Fulvus (leg. Aug.), 97. C. Baebius Atticus, 90. M. BiLLIENUS, 28. L. Brinnius Princeps (1), 45. M. Caedius Chilo (1), 47. P. Caesetius Postumus, 41. C. Calpetanus Rantius Seda- tus Metronius, 81. L. Calpurnius, 44. Q. Calpurnius Modestus, p. 93. Cn. Calpurnius Piso (cos. b.c. 23), 5. Camurius Statutus, 79. 14. T. Carisius, 12. Cassius Eros, 11. Claudius Optatus (1), 75. A. Clodius Flaccus, 41. L. Clodius iMacer, 62-65. P. Palpellius Maec. Clodius QuiRiNALis, p. 99. L. CoiEDius Candidus, p. 95. C. Cornelius Ampliatus, 78. Cornelius Aquila (leg. Aug.), 22. P. Cornelius Dolabella (leg. Aug.), 88. M. Cornelius Proculus, 49. Faustus Cornelius Sulla Felix (cos. A.D. 52), 78. Q. Cornelius Valerianus, p. 119. Cn. Domitius Ahenobarbus (cos. A.D. 32) 53, 100. L. Domitius Axiounus, 13. Cn. Domitius CoRBULO (leg.Aug.), 97. T. Domitius Decidius, 80. C. DuRRACHiNius Anthus, 78. L. FURIUS Salvius (1), 45. C. Gavius Silvanus, 76. N. Herennius Optatus (I), 47. m. holconius rufus, 41, 43. Istacidius, 40. Planta Iulius, 79. M. Iulius Cottius, 32. T. Julius Festus, 14. C. Iulius Gedemon, 16. Ti. Iulius Iustus, 92. Iulius Longus, 99. Ti. Iulius Optatus (I), 78. C. Iulius Otuaneunus, 16. C. Iulius Rufus, 16. L. lUNius Puteolanus (1), 46. M.IUNIUS SiLANUS (cos. A.D. I9, procos. Africae), 99. INDEX OF NAMES. 141 M. lUNIUS SiLANUS (cos. A.D. 46), 79. A. LiciNius Nerva Silianus, 6. D. LuciLius Salvius (1), 45. M. LucTERius Leo, 17. LUCTERIUS Senecianus, 17. L. Maecius Postumus, 66. C. Marcius Censorinus (cos. B.C. 8), 25. Mascarpius Festus, 48. M. Mascarpius Symphorio (1), 48. M. Massiaenius Secundus, 83. T. Mescinius Amphio (1), 41. Messius Arrius Inventus (1), 40. L. Mestius Priscus, 78. N. MiNius Hylas, 78. Q. MiNUCIUS IKARUS (1), 47. Gn.Munatius Aurelius Bassus, p. 25. L. (Nonius) Asprenas (cos. a.d. 6, procos. Africae), 98. Nonnius Ferox, 15. L. NUTRIUS Venustus, 78. D. Oppius Iaso (1), 45. M. Ovinius Faustus (1), 47. M. Petronius Classicus, 18. M. Petronius Lurco, 81. PiNARIUS Apollinaris, 79. M. Plautius Silvanus (cos. b.c. 2), 41, 45. Ti. Plautius Silvanus Aelianus (cos. A.D. 45, 74), 93. q. pompeius . . . . , 10. Tib. Pompeius Priscus, 36. Pompeia Secunda, 10. T. PomponiusEpaphroditus,78. N. POPIDIUS MOSCHUS (1), 41. P. PusoNius Peregrinus, 14. C. Sabinius Nedymus, 78. L. Salvidienus Rufus Salvia- NUS (cos. A.D. 52), 78. T. Satrius Decianus, 81. C. Sertorius Te . . . us, 94. M. SiTTIUS, 39. T. SoRNius, 39. Q. Sulpicius Camerinus (cos. A.D. 46), 79. p. Sulpicius Quirinius (cos. b.c. 12, leg. Caes.), 23. Tertinius Severus, 84. N. TiNTiRius Rufus, 41. Faustus Titius Liberalis (1), 53. M. Tullius, 42. C. Valerius Arabinus, 37. Valerius Maximus, 11. Q. Valerius Secundus, 85. Valeria, 11. Q. Varius Geminus (leg. d. Aug.), 27. C. Vedennius Moderatus, 77. A. Veius Phylax (1), 41. L. Verginius Rufus (leg. Aug.), 61. M. Vettius Valens, p. 10. L. ViNicius, 30. T. VoLUSius, 39. Aelianus, M vanus, 93. Ahenobarbus, Cn. Uomitius,53, 100. Aquila, Cornelius, 22. Arabinus, C. Valerius, 37. Asprenas, L, (Nonius), 98. Atticus, C. Baebius, 90. BuRRUS, Sex. Afranius, 60. COGNOMINA. [Only the most important are given.] Plautius Sil Camerinus, Q. Sulpicius, 79. Celer, 39. Censorinus, C. Marcius, 25. Corbulo, Cn. Domitius, 97. COTTIUS, M. lULIUS, 32. Decidius, T. Domitius, 80. DiPSCURTUS, 78. Uiuzenus, 78. 142 INDEX OF NAMES. DOLABELLA, P. CORNELIUS, 88. DONNUS, 32. Eposterovidus (Epotsorovidus), 16. Festus, T. Iulius, 14. Festus, Mascarpius, 48. Flavianus, 37. fulvus, t. aurelius, 97. Callus, C. Asinius, 25. Geminus, 0. Varius, 27. Cratus(s), 40. Leo, M. Lucterius, 17. Lepidus, M. Aemilius, 38. 2. LoNGUS, Iulius, 99. Macer, L. Clodius, 62-65. Marcellus, 40. Maximus, p. Anicius, 100. Memor(s), 40. MODERATUS, C. VEDENNIUS, 77. Otuaneunus, C. Iulius, 16. Piso, Cn. Calpurnius, 5. Primus(s), 41. Priscus, Tib. Pompeius, 36. Pylades(s), 61. (2uirinius, p. sulpicius, 23. RuFus, M. HoLCONius, 41, 43. RuFus, C. Iulius, 16. RuFus Salvianus, L. Salvidie- NUS, 78. RuFUS, L. Verginius, 61. Salvianus, L. Salvidienus RuFus, 78. Secundus, Q. Aemilius, 23. Secundus, O. Valerius, 85. Senecianus^Lucterius, 17. Silanus, M. Iunius (cos. a.d. 19), 99. Silanus, M. Iunius (cos. a.d. 46), 79. Silvanus, C. Gavius, 76. Silvanus, M. Plautius (cos. b.c. 2), 41, 45. Silvanus Aelianus, M. Plau- tius (cos. a.d. 45, 74), 93. Sparticus, 78. Sulla Felix, Faustus Corne- lius, 78. GEOGRAPHICAL INDEX. [Only names which occur in the inscriptions are given — References to the numbers unless otherwise stated.] ACTIACUS (of soldier present at the battle), 28. Aegae, 95. Aegyptus, 3, 100. Alexandria, 100. Alpes Maritumae, 90; Alpinae gentes, 31. Altinum, 33. Anauni, 79. 22. Antium, 77. Apamea. Apamena civitas, 23. lO. Apollonidea, 95. Baetica, see Hispania. Baiae, 79. 2. Bastarnae, 93. 1 8. Bergalei, 79. II. Bergidum Flavium. Bergido- flaviensis, 37. Bessus, 78. i8. BiLBILIS, 52. Bracara, 8. Britannia, 86, 93. 7, 100. Cadurcorum CIVITAS, 17; Cadur- cus, 36, Camalodunum, colonia Victri- CENSIS, p. 25. Cherronensus (Heraclea Cher- sonesus), 93. 23. ClBYRA, 95. CoMUM. Comenses, 79. 10. Cyme, 95. Daci, 93. 19. Daesitiates, 89. Danuvius,33 ; Transdanuviani, 93. 10. DiTIONES, 88. Dyrrachium. Dyrrachinus, 78 {b). Ephesos, 95. Galliae III, 36. Hierocaesarea, 95. HisPALis. Colonia Romula, 50. Hispania citerior, provincia, 37, 93. 27 (?). — ULTERIOR Baetica, 7. Hyrcania, 95. interamna, 53. Ituraei, 23. 13. Laiancorum civitas, 90. Libanus mons, 23. 13. Magnesia, 95. Marrucinus, 18. Mediolanum. Mediolanienses, 48.8. MiSENUM, 78. 5. Moesia, 90, 93. Mogontiacum, 94. Mostene, 95. Myrina, 95. 144 GEOGRAPHICAL INDEX. Narbo, 35. Narbonensis provincia, 35. 14. NORICUM, 90. OSTIA. PORTUS OSTIENSIS, 75. Paeligni, 27. Philadelphea, 95. Rhoxolani, 93. 19. Saevatum civitas, 90. Salassi, 31. Salonae, 88 (