Music Lib. MT 55 B764C bo UNTER POINT J.FREDERICK BRiDGE THE LIBRARY OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES GIFT MUSIC '-IBRARY COUNTERPOINT BY J. FREDERICK BRIDGE MUS. DOC, OXON. ORGAN'ST AND MASTER OP THE CHORISTERS OF WESTMINSTER ABKEV; PROFESSOR O HAlIMONY AND COUNTERPOINT AT THE ROYAL COLLEGE OF MUSIC; EXAMINER IN MUSIC FOR THE UNIVERSITIES OP OXFORD, CAMBRIDGE, LONDON, DURHAM; AND THE VICTOKIA UNIVERSITY; GRESHAM PROFESSOR OP MUSIC. 1.25 OLIVER DITSON COMPANY THEODORE PRESSER CO.. DISTRIBUTORS BRYN MAWR, PENNSYLVANIA MADE IN U.S.A. 4-437 _ 40001 My best thanks are due to Sir John Goss, for kindly allowing me to insert several examples, written in 1864, when I was receiving instruction from him iu counterpoint ; to H. Keeton, Esq., Mus. Doc, Organis* of Peterborough Cathedral, for Examples 121, 123. 127 ; and to James Higgs, Esq., Mus. Bac, Hon. Sec. of the Musical Association, for oiany valuable sug- gestions J. F. B. The Cloisters, Westminster Ab«e\',, MarJi, 1878. Music Libmry INTRODUCTORY OBSERVATIONS. TnK rirst attempts at combining parts to be performed simul- taneously, about which anything definite is known, resulted in what was called DIaplioiiy or Organiim^ the part to be accom- panied (corresponding to our ^iubject or canto termo) being termed Principalis, and the accompaniment, Oyganalis. This accompaniment consisted of fourths, fifths, and octaves, some one of these intervals being continued throughout, cither above or below, and sometimes botli above and below, the principalis. Various innovations on these crude forms, both as regards intervals and motion, were made from time to time, developing about the end of the eleventh centurv into what was termetl Descant. This was a great step forward, for while diaphony was generally " note against note" — tlie organalis moving through- out in similar motion, and at the same interval (/.r. in fourths, fifths, or octaves) — in descant, notes of various value, contrary motion, and even accidentals were used. The principalis was now termed the tennr{{xo\\\ teneo., •' I hold ") , this part as it were holding the subject and controlling the descant, as the organalis was now termed. Tliis was added accordinof to numerous rules depcjiding upon the progression of the tenor. Descant in its turn gave way to Counterpoint (see Definitions), the woid contrapunctum instead of descant being first used by a celebrated musical theorist of the fourteenth centurv, Jean de Muris. The term and functions of the tenor in like manner were supplanted by the Canto Prrnm. This frc(iuentlv consisted of some fragment of ecclesiastical music, hence it \vas called the '• plain song," although secular themes were sometimes adopted as Canti Fermi even of music for the Church. Counterpoint was written in the old Churcli modes, and its laws, constantly improving as they were, governed tlie art of musical composition up to nearlv tiie end of the sixteenth century. From this tinje rapid strides in the direction of modern tonality were made, and counterpoint iiaving ])ccoine ch^selv associated with artificial devices, a new art gradti.iIK s])rang up by which a melody could be accompanied without special reference to the inter-relation of the parts. Tliis was called Harmony^ of the development of 4 INTRODUCTORY OBSKRV'A TION'S. which we are not, of course, treating. In England and in some other countries it became customary to teach harmony o)dy^ or at ♦aiy rate before counterpoint. To a certain extent a reaction has set in, and many eminent musicians* now urge that counter- point should be taught with, and made the basis of, harmony. The author lias, however, in conformity with the more usual method of teaching, presupposed some slight knowledge of harmoriv ; and with this view he has ventured to use, without strictly dehning them, a few technical terms familiar to those who have thus studied. There is no doubt that the stud}' of counterpoint is most bene- ficial, exercising the powers in many directions not altogether covered by the study of harmony, particularly in the important matter of part-writing. It will be seen that the essence of counterpoint lies in the eq7ial interest which should belong to each part added to the canto fermo. This should be speciallv kept in mind in note against note and florid counterpoint, which are, after all. the species ot most artistic value, since the others, though most useful as ste})s between the elementary form of note against note and the developed form of florid, are in them- selves of less value as music. Our feeling for modern tonality need not necessarily be violated, since canti fermi free from ambiguity of key can be chosen. This point has been kept in view in writing the examples in the following pages, and the author trusts this will be accepted as his apology for using, for the most part, original examples, instead of inserting the well-known ones of Fux and other writers. It has been his desire to reconcile the spirit of ancient counterpoint with the feeling for modern tonality, and "to put before students exam23les which they ma\ readilv understand and imitate. *" The modern student should master the laws of counterpoint, and so approach the fundamental or massive harmonic school by the path of history." — Six Lectures on Harmony, by G. A. Macfarren, p. 35. DEFINITIONS. Canto Fermo. — A short diatonic passage, generally of whole notes, used as a subject for contrapuntal treatment. (See Intro- ductory Observations.) Although, following the usual custom, tlic whole note has been chosen as the notation for the canti lernii in all the examples illustrating this work, it is of course open to the student to use a note of any le