O SERMONS TO YOUNG MEN jfiftp'Cent EeH0iou0 Price 50 cents each net. Postage 7 cents per copy additional. The Social Message of the Modern Pulpit By Rev. CHARLES REYNOLDS BROWN Sixty Years with the Bible By Prof. WILLIAM NEWTON CLARKE, D.D. The Bible, Its Origin and Nature By Prof. MARCUS Dons, D.D. The Origin and Permanent Value of the Old Testament By Prof. CHARLES FOSTER KENT, Ph.D. The Gospel and the Church By ALFRED LOISY The Apostolic Age By Prof. JAMES HARDY ROPES Outlines of the Life of Christ By Prof. W. SANDAY, D.D., LL.D., Litt.D. The Passing Protestantism and Coming Cathol- icism By Rev. NEWMAN SMYTH, D.D. A Model Superintendent By Rev. H. CLAY TEUMBULL Sermons to Young Men By Dr. HENRY VAN DYKE Charles Scribner's Sons, New York SERMONS TO YOUNG MEN Beta) an* enlarges Cuitton of " Straight BY HENRY VAN DYKE r>. D. (PRINCETON, HARVARD, YALE) NEW YORK <{jarlE6 trtfanci j fi Sons 1912 Copyright, 1893, 1898, Bit HENRY VAN DYKE. All rights reserved. TO THE MEMORY OF PHILLIPS BROOKS A NOBLE MAN AMONG MEN A FAITHFUL PREACHER OF CHRIST AND A TRUE SHEPHERD OF SOULS THIS BOOK IS DEDICATED PREFACE THE call for a new edition of this little book affords an opportunity to change the title (which must have been somewhat mis- leading, since it was sometimes misappre- hended) and to add another chapter on a truth which is taken for granted through the whole volume, and underlies all its teach- ing, the truth that the person of Christ is the foundation of Christianity. The sermons here printed were written for a church in which there are a great many young men, and afterwards preached in col- lege chapels at Harvard, Yale, Princeton, and elsewhere. This fact is mentioned merely to account for their practical tend- ency, and to explain, or excuse, the circum- stance that there is nothing peculiar in their religious teaching. This singularity arises from the convic- tion, which I cherish, that young men are x preface really human beings. They are not a dis- tinct species. They belong to the human race and are entitled to be humanly treated. The best life for them is not separate and artificial, but natural, simple, active, full of vigorous exercise for mind and body. The right education for them is not that of the cloister, in which they are divided from the world, but that of the home, the school, the university, the camp, the workshop, the athletic field, the market-place, where lib- erty is joined to responsibility, and where they are taught to feel that they belong to the world and trained to play a noble, manly part in it. The true religion to guide them in this education, and fit them for this life, is not something novel and peculiar, spe- cially devised for young men, but simply the plain religion of Christ, which is good for everybody, of every age and condition, and for all alike. It is good for all of us human beings to know that we are not creatures of chance or jJrefarc xi fate, but children of God, capable of fellow- ship with Him, and heirs of immortality if we will only hold fast to our birthright. It is good for us all to have firm faith and true courage ; to pray for power from above ; and to live as those who have been redeemed by Christ from the bondage of sin and self- ishness and moral death. It is good for us all to take warning and encouragement from the mistakes and adventures of other men, and to bring the life-histories of the Bible home to our own business and bosoms. It is good for us all to refrain from harsh and hasty judgment of our fellow-men, and to im- itate what Francis of Assisi calls " the great Courtesy of God, who maketh his sun to shine and his rain to fall upon the just and upon the unjust." It is good for us all not to waste our time in speculating about those mysteries of theology which lie beyond the horizon, but rather to content ourselves with proving the value of a short creed, honestly believed and thoroughly applied. This, in xii preface outline, is the kind of religion which my father (of blessed memory) taught to me, and which I have tried to teach in these sermons. But there is one thing in which they have been distinctly influenced by the character of the congregations to whom they were preached. No thinking minister can stand up before a company largely composed of young men without a strong wish to be plain- spoken and to come straight to the point. They have a fine impatience of all mere for- malities and roundabout modes of speech, which acts as a moral tonic to brace the mind from vagueness and cleanse the tongue of cant. They want a man to say what he means and to mean what he says. The influence of this unspoken demand is whole- some and inspiring, and the preacher ought to show his gratitude for it by honestly en- deavouring to meet it. For this reason I have tried to write these sermons, not in a theological dialect, but in the English language. |Jrcfacr xiii Their real aim is nothing else than to help people to be good, which is the hardest and the finest thing in the world. Their gospel is simply this : that the sure way to be good is to trust and follow Jesus Christ, the Son of God. THE BRICK CHURCH MANSE, NEW YOKK, January 27, 1898. CONTENTS. MM I. A MAN 1 II. FAITH 27 III. COURAGE 51 IV. POWER 71 V. REDEMPTION 97 VI. ABRAHAM'S ADVENTURE .... 123 VII. SOLOMON'S CHOICE 147 VIII. PETER'S MISTAKE 167 IX. GOD OVER ALL 191 X. THE HORIZON 211 XI. CHRIST FUNDAMENTAL 235 A MAN '' poia mucl), tljen, is a man better tljan a sljccp '? " Matthew xii. 12. "f)oto mttt&, t&en, is a man better t&an a 6&eep ? " To Him who first spoke these noble words they were an exclamation ; for He knew, as no one else has ever known, " what was in man." But to us, who repeat them, they often seem like a question ; for we are so ig- norant of what is best in ourselves and our fellow-men, we have so confused ourselves with artificial views and theories, that we find ourselves at the point to ask in perplexity, How much, then, is a man better than a sheep? It is evident that the answer to this ques- tion must depend upon the view that we take of life. And at the very outset I want to in- vite your attention to two of the views that are current in the world, and the necessary conclusions to which they lead us in regard toman. Suppose, in the first place, that we take a materialistic view of life. We shall then deny all evidence except that which we re- ceive through our senses. Looking at the world from this standpoint, we shall see in it a great mass of matter, curiously regulated by laws which have results but no purposes, and agitated into various modes of motion by a secret force whose origin is, and forever must be, unknown. Life, in man as in other animals, is but one form of this force. Ris- ing through many subtle gradations from the first tremor that passes through the gas- tric nerve of a jelly-fish to the most delicate vibration of gray matter in the brain of a Plato or a Shakespeare, it is really the same from the beginning to the end, physical in its birth among the kindred forces of heat and electricity, physical in its decay and ex- tinction as the causes which sustain it are gradually weakened or suddenly cut off. The only difference between man and the other animals is a difference of degree. The ape takes his place in our ancestral tree, and with the sheep we must acknowledge at least a cousinship. It is true that we have somewhat the ad- vantage of these poor relations. We belong a ;f*Un 5 to the more fortunate branch of the family, and have entered upon an inheritance con- siderably enlarged by the extinction of col- lateral branches. But, after all, it is the same inheritance ; and there is nothing in humanity which is not derived from, and des- tined to, earth and ashes and dust. If, then, you accept this view of life, what answer can you give to the question, How much is a man better than a sheep ? You must say : He is a little better, but not much. In some things he has the advantage. He lives longer, and has more powers of action and capacities of pleasure. He is more clever, and has succeeded in making the sheep subject to his domination. But the bal- ance is not all on one side. The sheep has fewer pains, as well as fewer pleasures ; less toil, as well as less power. If it does not know how to make a coat, at least it succeeds in growing its own natural wool clothing, and that without taxation. Above all, the sheep is not troubled with any of those vain dreams of moral responsibility and future life which are the cause of such great and needless trouble to humanity. The flocks that fed in the pastures of Bethlehem got just as much 6 physical happiness out of existence as the shepherd David who watched them; and, being natural agnostics, they were free from David's errors in regard to religion. They could give all their attention to eating, drink- ing, and sleeping, which is the chief end of life. From the materialistic standpoint, a man may be a little better than a sheep, but not much. Or suppose, in the second place, that we take the commercial view of life. We shall then say that all things must be measured by their money value, and that it is neither profitable nor necessary to inquire into their real nature or their essential worth. Men and sheep are worth what they will bring in the open market ; and this depends upon the supply and demand. Sheep of a very rare breed have been sold for as much as five or six thousand dollars. But men of common stock, in places where men are plenty and cheap (as for example in Central Africa), may be purchased for the price of a rusty musket or a piece of cotton cloth. Accord- ing to this principle, we must admit that the comparative value of a man and a sheep is a very uncertain matter, and that there are 31 times when the dumb animal is much the more valuable of the two. Of course, you perceive that this view, carried out to its logical conclusions, means slavery ; and you call my attention to the fact that slavery has been abolished, by com- mon consent of the civilized world. Yes, thank God, that is true. We have done away with the logical conclusion. In this land, at least, men and sheep are no longer put up at the same block to be disposed of to the highest bidder. We have gotten rid of the logical conclusion. But have we got- ten rid entirely of the premise on which it rested? Does not the commercial view of life still prevail in civilized society ? " How much is that man worth ? " asks the curious inquirer. " That man," answers the animated Commercial Registry and Business Directory, " is worth a million dollars ; and the man sitting next to him is not worth a penny." What other answer can be given by one who judges everything by a money standard ? If wealth is really the measure of value, if the end of life is the production or the acquisition of riches, then humanity must take its place in the sliding scale of com- 8 modities. Its value is not fixed and certain. It depends upon accidents of trade. We must learn to look upon ourselves and our fellow-men purely from a business point of view, and to ask only : What can this man make ? how much has that man made ? how much can I get out of this man's labour ? how much will that man pay for my services ? Those little children that play in the squalid city streets, they are nothing to me or to the world ; there are too many of them, they are worthless. Those long -fleeced, high- bred sheep that feed upon my pastures, they are among my most costly possessions, they will bring an enormous price, they are im- mensely valuable. How much is a man better than a sheep ? What a foolish ques- tion ! Sometimes the man is better ; some* times the sheep is better. It all depends upon the supply and demand. Now these two views of life, the material- istic and the commercial, always have ex- isted and do still exist in the world. Men have held them consciously and uncon- sciously. At this very day there are some who profess them ; and there are many who act upon them, although they may not be will- a jftan 9 ing to acknowledge them. They have been the parents of countless errors in philosophy and sociology ; they have bred innumerable and loathsome vices and shames and cruel- ties and oppressions in the human race. It was to shatter and destroy these deadly false- hoods, to sweep them away from the mind and heart of humanity, that Jesus Christ came into the world. We cannot receive his gos- pel in any sense, we cannot begin to under- stand its meaning and purpose, unless we fully, freely, and sincerely accept his great revelation of the divine dignity and inesti- mable value of man as man. We say this was his revelation. Un- doubtedly it is true that Christ came to re- veal God to man. But undoubtedly it is just as true that He came to reveal man to himself. He called himself the Son of God, but He called himself also the Son of Man. His nature was truly divine, but his nature was no less truly human. He became man. And what is the meaning of that lowly birth in the most helpless form of infancy, if it be not to teach us that humanity is so related to Deity that it is capable of receiving and embodying God himself ? He died for man. 10