/ 
 
 The self-induced E.M.F. is a sine function, and its 
 negative crest value occurs when wt = o, or an even 
 multiple of TT, the positive crest values when >/ is an 
 odd multiple of TT. 
 
 Since the equation of the current is 
 
 i=l sin >/ 
 we see that for ^ = o, when the current is passing 
 
84 TRANSFORMERS 
 
 through zero to become positive, the E.M.F. has its 
 greatest negative value, whilst for i I when a>t = 
 
 - the E.M.F. is passing through zero to become positive. 
 
 The phase of this E.M.F. lags therefore a quarter 
 period behind the current, and since it must be com- 
 pensated by an equal and opposite E.M.F. impressed 
 on the coil, this must lead a quarter period in advance of 
 the current. We write, therefore 
 
 E = o,LI 
 
 where E and I are crest values, or if we use effective 
 values we have 
 
 e = t*>Lz (17) 
 
 e being the E.M.F. which must be impressed on the 
 circuit in order to balance and overcome the self-induced 
 E.M.F. Since L is a length and to an angular velocity, 
 ft) L is a linear velocity and has therefore the same 
 dimensions as an ohmic resistance. It is called reactance. 
 If an alternating E.M.F. be applied to a condenser, a 
 charging current will flow. Let C be the capacity in 
 farads, then for E volt continuous pressure applied 
 to the terminals, the charge in coulomb or ampere- 
 seconds is 
 
 Q = CE 
 
 A change de in applied pressure taking place in the 
 time dt produces a change dQ in the charge, and since 
 
 dQ = idt 
 
 de 
 
 we have Cde = idt and i = C T 
 
 dt 
 
 Since e is a harmonic function with crest value E so that 
 e = E sin cot and de = >E cos totdt we find 
 
 z = Co)E cos wt 
 e = E sin wt 
 
 Since e is proportional to the sine and i to the cosine 
 of the same angle, it follows that the vectors of 
 these quantities are in quadrature, the current vector 
 leading. The charging current attains its positive crest 
 
SELF-INDUCTION AND CAPACITY 
 
 value for wt = o, or an even multiple of 2?r, and is given 
 by- 
 
 if the capacity C is counted in microfarad and the 
 E.M.F. in volt. The effective value of the condenser 
 current is 
 
 * = o,C*io- (18) 
 
 If a circuit contains inductance L and resistance R, the 
 E.M.F. to be impressed in order to force the current 
 i through it must have two components : one Rz in 
 phase with the current and the other o>Le in advance of 
 the current by 90. The vectorial sum of these two is, 
 
 L 
 
 WUWUUlrj 
 
 [ooooooooooo_pooooo(T 1 
 
 " 4 
 
 SB, 
 
 uuuu 
 
 < 
 
 5 
 
 FIG. 45. Circuit containing resistance, inductance and capacity. 
 
 therefore, the hypotenuse of a right-angle triangle with 
 >Lz and R^ as cathets, and the angle of lag L) 2 is called the impedance of the 
 circuit. If two or more such circuits are fed from the 
 
86 TRANSFORMERS 
 
 same source of E.M.F. we can thus determine the 
 position and magnitude of the current vector for each 
 separately, and combine them, as already shown, to get 
 the position and magnitude of the resultant current 
 vector. Alternating current problems are best solved 
 graphically. As an example we may take the circuit 
 shown on the left side of Fig. 45. On the right side is 
 the vector diagram. L and R being in series, we first 
 determine tg
 = 27rv we find the natural frequency of the 
 
 crcut 
 
 1 60 
 
 C being given in Microfarad and L in Henry. 
 
 Influence of higher harmonics. Up to the present 
 we have assumed that current and E.M.F. follow a 
 simple sine law. If, however, their curves contain 
 upper harmonics, the E.M.F. of self-induction, as well 
 as the charging current, will be somewhat altered. 
 
 Since in one case e=\^, and in the other ^'=C^ the 
 
 investigations can be carried on in the same way provided 
 we put for i or e the expression 
 
 a = AX sin (o>/) + A 3 sin (3oi/) + A 5 sin (5>^)+ . . . 
 
 and determine the square root of mean squares. We then 
 find that besides the square of these terms, products of 
 two of them have to be integrated. The integral of 
 these products taken between the limits of W = o and 
 o>/ = 2?r is zero throughout, so that only the integrals of 
 the squares of the single terms remain, and we thus find 
 
 Ij being the crest value of the first harmonic, I 3 that of 
 the third, and so on. 
 
 In the same way we find 
 
 
88 
 
 TRANSFORMERS 
 
 Ei, E 8 , E 5 , etc., being the crest values of the different 
 harmonics. 
 
 Power of an alternating current. In order to 
 investigate the working condition of a transformer we 
 must be able to determine the power given to the 
 primary and taken from the secondary terminals. It is 
 therefore necessary that we should be able to find, either 
 by direct measurement or in some other way, the power 
 conveyed by an alternating current. We assume for 
 the present that current and E.M.F. follow a sine law. 
 This assumption is made for the sake of simplicity. It 
 is not always correct, but we shall see later on that the 
 methods of measuring power which are based on this 
 
 assumption are also 
 applicable in the 
 general case where 
 the current as well 
 as the E.M.F. fol- 
 low any law, pro- 
 vided the frequency 
 of both is the same. 
 Let, in Fig. 46, 
 the sine line I re- 
 present the current 
 as a function of the 
 time, and the line E the E.M.F. impressed on any 
 two points of the circuit, say, for instance, the primary 
 terminals of a transformer. We count the time in the 
 direction to the right. At the time o the current is 
 negative (the ordinate of the current curve I being 
 below the axis), and the E.M.F. is zero, At time t^ 
 the current is zero and the E.M.F. has a certain positive 
 value. The maximum E.M.F. occurs at time 4 and 
 the maximum current a little later at time 4- At 
 time / 4 the E.M.F. has decreased to zero, but the 
 current is still positive, though rapidly decreasing. It 
 reaches zero at time / 5 , when the E.M.F. has already 
 a negative value. Since both curves follow the same 
 law the horizontal distances between their maximum and 
 zero values must all be the same, that is to say, the time 
 interval between any two pairs of corresponding points is 
 
 FIG. 46. Curves of E.M.F. and current. 
 
POWER OF AN ALTERNATING CURRENT 89 
 
 a constant. Thus 4 / 2 = 4 1 = t / 6 , etc. This time 
 difference between corresponding values of the E.M.F. 
 and current is called the lag or lead of current or 
 E.M.F. respectively. In our example, where the E.M.F. 
 passes its zero and maximum values before the current 
 passes through the corresponding values, we have a 
 lagging current as compared to the E.M.F., or a lead- 
 ing E.M.F. as compared to the current. The condition 
 under which this relation obtains is the existence, in 
 addition to the impressed E.M.F., of a second E.M.F. 
 which tends to oppose any and every change of current. 
 As already explained in this chapter, this is our E.M.F. 
 of self-induction, and is produced by the change in the 
 magnetic flux due to the current. If, however, instead 
 of this opposing E.M.F., there acts an E.M.F. in the 
 inverse sense, then every change in current strength is 
 thereby promoted, and the current attains its zero and 
 maximum values sooner than the impressed E.M.F., or 
 in other words, we have a current leading before the 
 impressed E.M.F. Such a second E.M.F. tending to 
 advance the current is produced by the insertion of a 
 condenser into the circuit. The condenser takes the 
 maximum positive charging current at the moment that 
 the impressed E.M.F. on its terminals passes through 
 zero in a positive sense. When the impressed E.M.F. 
 has attained its positive maximum the condenser is fully 
 charged, and the charging current is zero. When the 
 impressed E.M.F. now begins to decrease, it is still 
 positive, but the condenser begins already to discharge, 
 producing a negative current, which becomes a maximum 
 at the moment when the impressed E.M.F. passes through 
 zero, and so on. We see thus that the condenser current 
 leads over the impressed E.M.F. by a quarter period. 
 
 In addition to the two cases here considered, a 
 third case is possible in which no second E.M.F. either 
 advancing or retarding the current is acting ; in this case 
 (glow lamps fed from a transformer) the current will 
 have the same phase as the impressed E.M.F., and its 
 strength will be simply determined by Ohm's law. 
 
 The periodic variation in current and E.M.F. may 
 be conveniently represented by a clock diagram. Let, 
 
TRANSFORMERS 
 
 in Fig. 47, the outermost circle be used to mark the 
 time (somewhat in the fashion of a clock-dial), and let 
 O/ be the hand of a clock revolving with constant 
 angular speed. We count the time from the moment in 
 which O^ stands horizontally to the left. Let in this 
 moment the E.M.F. be zero. Describe a circle the 
 radius of which represents to any convenient scale the 
 maximum or crest value of the E.M.F., then the pro- 
 jection of this radius on the vertical gives to the same 
 scale the instantaneous value of the E.M.F. at the time 
 
 to which the posi- 
 tion of O/ corre- 
 sponds. Thus at 
 the time t the 
 E. M. F. vector 
 occupies the posi- 
 tion OE, and the 
 instantaneous 
 value of the 
 E.M.F. is OE,. 
 We count the 
 E.M.F. as posi- 
 tive if E, is above, 
 and negative if 
 
 o 
 
 E, is below the 
 axis. 
 
 The instantane- 
 ous value of the 
 current may be represented in a similar manner, but 
 the current vector must be drawn with an angular lag 
 we denote the 
 angular speed, the following equations obtain 
 
 ) = 27T 
 
 a = wl 
 da = wdt 
 da = 2 
 
 Since work is the product of power and time, we have 
 for the work performed by the current in the time dt the 
 expression 
 
 = Vdt 
 
 the curves E and I to 
 
 FIG. 48. Curves of E.M.F., current and power. 
 
 In Fig. 48 are drawn 
 represent respect- 
 ively E.M.F. and 
 current. By multi- 
 plying their ordin- 
 ates we obtain the 
 ordinates of a third 
 curve marked P, 
 which represents 
 the instantaneous 
 value of the power, 
 whilst the area en- 
 closed between P 
 and the horizontal 
 represents work. For ordinates above the horizontal, 
 the power is positive, or given to the circuit ; for those 
 below the horizontal it is negative, or taken from the 
 circuit. To obtain the work given to the circuit during 
 a complete cycle, we must measure the area of P between 
 the ordinates for / = o and / = T. counting the small 
 
 O 
 
 shaded parts below the horizontal as negative. The 
 work corresponding to a complete cycle is 
 
 e = 
 
 The instantaneous power varies, as will be seen from 
 Fig. 48, between a small negative and a larger positive 
 maximum. Let us now suppose that we substitute for 
 this varying power the constant power of a continuous 
 
92 TRANSFORMERS 
 
 current, so that the work taken over the time T is the 
 same in both cases, then the constant power (which in 
 future we will call effective power) is the quotient of 
 work and time, or in symbols 
 
 p=l 
 
 T 
 
 Substituting for P, dt, and T the values given above, 
 we obtain also 
 
 ml ft 6TT 
 
 P = / E I sin a sin (a 
) sin 
 
 /? . 
 
 = /(sin 
 
 J 
 
 . . \dmoi 
 
 cos m0 sm cos ;;za sin ma) 
 
 m 
 
 The integral of the second term in the bracket is zero, 
 and that of the first term is 
 
 27T 
 
 cos m$ ma 7 
 
 . / = TT cos m
R 
 
 where R is the magnetic reluctance of the whole flux- 
 circuit, that is, the sum of the magnetic reluctances of 
 its individual parts. 
 
 R = '-si 1 
 
 O'47T S fJ. 
 
 //! i 4 i 
 
 O rv & I i i _ ^ i_ 
 
 \Si fa S 2 fa 
 
 In this expression /j means the length of the magnetic 
 path in cm. in that part of the magnetic circuit which 
 has a cross-section of B! sq. cm. and permeability fa, 
 and so on with the other members. In this formula 
 it is assumed that the same flux passes through the 
 different cross-sections S 1? S 2 , etc., and this assumption 
 is justified in transformers which are generally so de- 
 signed as to reduce the leakage flux to a very small 
 fraction of the main flux. 
 
 By inserting the expression for R into the formula 
 for ampere-turns or exciting force X, and remembering 
 7 97 
 
9 8 
 
 TRA NSFORMER S 
 
 that the flux  equals the product of induction B and 
 cross-section S, we also have 
 
 If the dimensions of a magnetic circuit be known, we 
 can find the values of B 1} B 2 , etc., for any given value 
 of the total flux <. The corresponding values of the 
 permeability ja we can take from a magnetisation curve 
 of the material used, and the values of / can be 
 measured off on a drawing of the carcase. We have 
 thus all the data required to find the relation of X 
 and (f) or I and . In other words, we obtain < as a 
 
 function of I or as a function 
 of X. A curve which repre- 
 sents this function is called 
 the char-act eristic curve of the 
 magnetic circuit. Its general 
 shape is represented in Fig. 50. 
 In order to facilitate the 
 drawing of this curve, we may 
 use magnetisation curves, 
 which give the value 
 o'8B 
 
 FIG. 50. 
 
 X 
 
 that is, the ampere-turns required for i cm. of path and 
 various values of the inductions. We then find 
 
 If the magnetic path contains an air-gap of length S, 
 in which the induction is B, then this requires o' 
 ampere-turns, and the total exciting force is 
 
 Energy stored in a magnetic circuit* Let in Fig. 50 
 the current grow from zero to its final value Ij, and the 
 flux grow from zero to its final value fa. At a given 
 moment the current is i and the flux fa If the current 
 increases by di, the flux increases by tfy. If the increase 
 
ENERGY STORED IN A MAGNETIC CIRCUIT 99 
 
 takes place in time dt, the E.M.F. generated in the 
 n turns of the magnetising coil is, in volt 
 
 C := I't ' I O 
 
 The energy d& given to the circuit is eidt, or 
 
 But id$ is the area of the shaded rectangle, and it is 
 therefore obvious that the total energy stored in the 
 magnetic circuit carrying the flux ( b by reason of the 
 exciting force \^n ampere-turns, is the area enclosed 
 between the characteristic curve and the ^ line, 
 multiplied with nio~ 8 . If the characteristic curve were 
 drawn with ampere-turns instead of ampere as abscissa?, 
 then the area multiplied with icr 8 
 would be the energy. It should be 
 noted that the energy is independent 
 of the number of turns in the exciting 
 coil. Since we used volt and ampere, 
 and e refers to the change of flux 
 per second, the energy is given in 
 watt-seconds or joule. 
 
 The more exciting force is re- FIG. 51. 
 
 quired to produce a given flux ^ 
 the greater is the energy stored. If there were no 
 air space through which the flux has to pass, the 
 characteristic would for a moderate induction be very 
 steep, and the area enclosed between it and the axis 
 would be small. It follows from this that it is chiefly 
 that part of the magnetic circuit which lies in air which 
 forms the store of energy. For fairly low inductions, 
 that is, values of B which lie below the knee of the 
 magnetising curve and a long air space, the first term in 
 the equation for \n is enormously greater than the other 
 terms, so that we may neglect the latter and write 
 
 I=o*8B8 
 
 The characteristic then becomes a straight line, Fig. 
 51, and 
 
ioo TRANSFORMERS 
 
 . rx =tga. being the slope of the characteristic to the 
 
 horizontal, and S the section of the air space. The 
 energy is the shaded area multiplied by io~ 8 , or 
 
 2 
 
 if we take as a unit for the flux the megaline, and as a 
 unit of exciting force 1000 ampere-turns, the energy is 
 
 in joule . . . 10 x shaded area 
 in km. . . .1*02 x shaded area 
 
 From X = o-8BS and = io~ 8 we find- 
 
 In this formula S is given in sq. cm. and in cm.; their 
 product is the volume of magnetised air given in cub. cm. 
 Let this volume be given in cub. dm. or litres, and call 
 it V, then the energy in joules can be written 
 
 e = 4 v(-B_y . (25) 
 
 Viooo/ v ' 
 
 The energy contained in one litre of magnetised air 
 
 /By. i / B v 
 
 stores therefore I ) joule, or ^- ^- ) metre kilo- 
 gram, as shown in the following table 
 
 Energy stored in one litre of air traversed by a magnetic flux 
 with induction B. 
 
 = O'S I 3 8 12 IS 2O 
 
 1000 
 
 Joule =i 4 36 256 476 900 1600 
 
 Metre kg. = 1*02 4^08 3-67 26 48 92 163 
 
 The property of the magnetic circuit to act as a store 
 of energy is utilised in the construction of so-called choking 
 coils, as will be explained at the end of this chapter. 
 
 The hysteretic loop. It has already been stated that 
 the change of induction taking place continuously in the 
 carcase of a transformer involves a certain loss of energy 
 and a corresponding generation of heat. The energy lost 
 per cycle is the difference between that which has been 
 
THE HYSTERETIC LOOP \>;&i 
 
 stored in one stage of the process and that which is 
 returned in another stage of the process. If the material 
 undergoing cyclic magnetisation is air, the whole of the 
 energy stored in magnetisation is again recovered in 
 demagnetisation ; but with iron this is not so. If we 
 determine experimentally the magnetisation curve of any 
 sample of iron whilst this is being carried through a 
 complete cycle (methods for such tests are given in 
 Chapter VIII), we find that the I/z-B curve follows one 
 path for increasing values of I 
 and another for decreasing 
 values, the two curves forming 
 a loop, the so-called hysteretic 
 loop. This is represented in 
 Fig. 52, where the magnetising 
 force is plotted horizontally and 
 the induction vertically. The 
 sense in which the cycle is 
 performed is shown by arrows. 
 Since the energy representing 
 the half cycle from - B to + B 
 is proportional to the area en- 
 closed between the right side of 
 the loop and the B axis, and 
 since the energy in the return FlG 52 
 
 half cycle from + B to -B is 
 
 represented by the area between the left side of the loop 
 and the same axis, the energy lost in one complete cycle 
 is proportional to the area of the loop, and is given by 
 the equation 
 
 6 = area x io~ 8 joule 
 
 Since we take ordinates to represent B and not < as 
 before, the loss refers to an element of the magnetic 
 circuit i sq. cm. in cross-section. Let / be the length of 
 this element, then the loss per cycle per cub. cm. will 
 be found by dividing the above expression by /, or in 
 mathematical language 
 
 + E 
 
 *X 
 
102 TRANSFORMERS 
 
 Now, _ 4^ = H, the magnetising force in C.G.S. 
 units, so that we may also write 
 
 -B 
 
 /" 
 
 = -^. /H^B 
 
 -B 
 
 = -. H^Bio- 7 joule 
 
 . (26) 
 
 -B 
 
 In this latter form the hysteretic loss per cycle for i 
 cub. cm. is generally given in text-books. 
 
 No-load current of a transformer. Since the cyclic 
 magnetisation is accompanied with certain losses, the idle 
 or no-load current must have a component in phase with 
 the induced voltage, a so-called watt component. It 
 must also have a wattless component, that is, one lagging 
 90 behind the induced voltage, and consequently co- 
 phasal with the flux. The idle current is very small in 
 comparison to the full-load current, only a few per cent. 
 of it, and as the ohmic drop with full-load current is 
 only a few per cent, (sometimes less than i per cent.) 
 of the working or impressed voltage, we may, in cal- 
 culating the idle current, assume equality between 
 induced and impressed voltage, and determine the two 
 components of this current on the assumption that one is 
 in phase and the other in quadrature with the impressed 
 E.M.F. We shall also assume that the impressed E.M.F. 
 and both components of the no-load current are sine 
 functions of their respective crest values. As will be 
 shown presently, this assumption is not strictly correct as 
 regards the wattless component, but we make it never- 
 theless in order to simplify the calculation. The error is 
 not important. 
 
 Let P 7j be the power wasted in the iron in hysteresis 
 and eddy currents, and e the effective value of the 
 
NO-LOAD CURRENT OF A TRANSFORMER 103 
 
 E.M.F. ; then the effective value of the watt component 
 for a single-phase transformer is 
 
 P* 
 
 The effective value of the wattless component is 
 
 where B is the induction in the air-gaps of the butt-joints 
 and & their combined length. The symbols .r and / under 
 the summation sign have the meaning already explained, 
 
 FIG. 53. Diagram of idle 
 current and power. 
 
 FIG. 54. Magnetic path 
 in shell transformer. 
 
 whilst n is the total number of turns traversed by the 
 idle current. The effective value of the latter is 
 
 The relation between these quantities is shown in 
 ig. 53, which also shows in the shaded area the power 
 wasted by the idle current. 
 
 In a core transformer having the same cross-section 
 in core and yoke / is the mean length of the lines of force 
 taken round the rectangle of the carcase, and the sum- 
 mation in the formula for ^ has only one term. If the 
 yokes are of larger cross-section than the cores (they 
 would obviously not be made smaller) then the summation 
 has two terms, one for the two cores and the other for 
 the two yokes. 
 
 In a shell transformer / is taken round one window 
 as shown in Fig. 54. Since the flux divides in the 
 shell the cross-section of the latter may be half that of 
 the core. It may also be greater, but not smaller. 
 
104 
 
 TRA NS FORMERS 
 
 To determine the idle current for a given impressed 
 voltage e we first calculate the flux < from 
 
 4'44 
 
 100 
 
 n 
 
 and then the various values of B = - 
 
 Ampere turns per centimeter 
 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 180 
 
 2 3 
 
 6 6 7 ft ft 10 11 12 13 14 15 10 17 18 
 Ampere turns per centimeter 
 
 FIG. 55. Characteristic of Transformer Plates. 
 
 The length of air-gap at each butt-joint, if any, may 
 be taken as at most mm., or 8= 0*025, and the values 
 of :r corresponding to each value of B may be taken from 
 the curves, Fig. 55. It will be seen that up to a certain 
 value of the induction alloyed iron requires a little less 
 exciting force than ordinary iron ; only if the induction 
 
SHAPE OF EXCITING CURRENT 105 
 
 is very large is this relation reversed. A very high 
 induction is, however, hardly admissible, since, even if it 
 be possible to keep the temperature down by some special 
 cooling arrangements, the large magnetising current is as 
 a general rule objectionable. 
 
 In three-phase core transformers each limb serves 
 one phase, and since one phase is magnetically and 
 electrically always in series with one or two others, the 
 value of / and & is only half what it would be in a 
 single-phase transformer. Thus the wattless current of 
 one phase must be calculated on the assumption that 
 it has to propel the flux through its own core, two butt- 
 joints, and about half the yokes. 
 
 Shape of exciting current. A knowledge of the 
 hysteretic loop, sheered over so as to include the influence 
 of butt-joints if any, is necessary for the determination 
 of the shape of the exciting or magnetising current and 
 the resulting idle current. We assume, as before, a sine 
 wave of E.M.F., and consequently also a sine or rather 
 cosine wave of induction. To each value of B corre- 
 spond two values of z' M , the one given by the ascending, 
 the other by the descending branch of the loop. The 
 graphic construction of the z^-time curve is then as shown 
 in Fig. 56. The hysteretic loop on the left gives B as 
 a function of i^ the sine curve on the right gives B as a 
 function of the time. By combining the two it is easy 
 to find the curve giving ^ as a function of the time. 
 Thus a particular value of B, to which correspond the 
 currents zi and z 2 , occurs at the times ^ and t^. Then 
 plot o^ over / lf and oi 2 over t# giving z\ and i 2 as two 
 points of the curve required. The whole curve ^ may 
 be drawn in this way. The curve i h is simply a sine 
 curve in quadrature with B. The idle current curve z' is 
 the resultant of these two components. 
 
 Choking coil. A coil having large inductance and 
 small resistance, so that it will cause a lag of current of 
 nearly 90 behind the E.M.F. impressed on its terminals, 
 is called a choking coil. Such a coil might be obtained 
 by altering a transformer so that it will take a large no- 
 load current. The alteration would consist in enlarging 
 the butt-joints and suppressing the secondary winding as 
 
io6 
 
 TRANSFORMERS 
 
 superfluous. Since now the current is large, the ohmic 
 loss is no longer negligible and the watt component of 
 the current will be increased. If R is the resistance of 
 
 the winding and the loss in iron is as before P //} we 
 have 
 
CHOKING COIL 107 
 
 for calculating the wattless component we may neglect 
 and simply write 
 
 \/ 
 
 n 
 
 The lag being intended to be nearly 90 we must so 
 design the coil that i h will be very small in comparison 
 with i^ and then i will be very nearly equal to i^. We 
 can therefore write 
 
 o-SBS 
 
 t = or i = 
 
 n\/2 
 
 TOO 
 
 if by P we denote the apparent power of the coil 
 expressed not in watt but in volt-ampere. The true 
 power taken by the coil is 
 
 P =P A +R; 2 
 
 and its power factor is 
 
 Pj 
 
 cos = - ^ 
 ei 
 
 This is to be a minimum. It is obvious that maxi- 
 mum lag and therefore minimum power factor will be 
 reached with one particular value of i, which we find 
 from the condition that 
 
 d 
 
 this gives P A = Rt* ..... (27) 
 
 which means that greatest choking effect combined with 
 a minimum waste of power will be obtained if the coil is 
 so designed as to make the loss in iron equal to the 
 ohmic loss. For purely constructive or commercial 
 reasons it may sometimes be necessary to slightly depart 
 from this rule. Thus, it might be desirable to use 
 existing stampings for the carcase, or a particular gauge 
 of wire in stock, etc. If, by accommodating the design 
 to commercial requirements, the difference between the 
 two losses does not exceed 10 or 15 per cent, of their 
 
1 08 TRANSFORMERS 
 
 sum, a departure to this extent from the rule of best 
 proportions is admissible. 
 
 The equation which connects current and induction 
 in the air-gap may be written in the form 
 
 if by I we denote the crest value of the current. Let 
 similarly E be the crest value of the E.M.F., then we have 
 the relation 
 
 E = 
 
 where > = ITTV. Since current and E.M.F. are in quadra- 
 ture, their simultaneous values at any instant are 
 
 i=\ sin a 
 e = E cos a 
 
 The instantaneous value of the power is- 
 
 ei= El sin a cos a 
 
 It is positive for all values of a between the limits o and 
 , or arand ; it is negative for all values of a between 
 
 the limits and TT, or TT and 2?r. We see thus that during 
 
 one complete period the choking coil takes in energy 
 twice and gives off energy twice. To find the amount 
 of energy stored in a quarter period we determine 
 
 = /E I sin a cos adt 
 
 
 
 7T 
 
 /~2 da. 
 
 S= /El sin a cos a- 
 
 J CO 
 
 
 
 i El i ei / Q x 
 
 e=- - = >- .... (28) 
 
 CO 2 CO 27TV 
 
 If then frequency, choking volt and ampere to be 
 passed are known, we can determine the energy to be 
 
CHOKING COIL 
 
 109 
 
 stored in the air-gap. Inserting the values for E and I 
 we obtain 
 
 1"\ CV 
 
 I 
 
 ~ 2(0 C 
 
 = o4r- 
 or if we take for the volume 
 
 *-4V(-5L\ 
 
 \ i ooo/ 
 
 the same expression which has already been found on 
 page 100. Each litre of magnetised air is the carrier of 
 
 the litre as unit 
 B \ 2 
 
 As an example for the applica- 
 tion of these formulae take the 
 case of a choking coil which is 
 required to let pass 10 ampere at 
 a choking pressure of 100 volt 
 when the frequency is 50. We 
 have then = 314 and ei=* 1000. 
 This gives 
 
 220 
 
 FIG. 57. Choking coil. 
 
 1000 . 
 
 e = = 3-2 joule 
 
 If we assume an induction in the air-gap of 5000, 
 one litre of air will store 200 joule, so that we require a 
 
 *"? * O 
 
 total volume of air-gaps of - cub. dm., or 32 cub. cm., 
 
 100 
 
 which may conveniently be subdivided into four gaps, as 
 shown in Fig. 57. The dimensions are figured in mm. 
 We make the central core 5 cm. square, and the shell 
 of double the cross-section of the core. The latter is 
 2 i 7 sq. cm. The total weight of iron is 1 2 kg., and with 
 an induction of 11,600 in the core the total loss of 
 power in the carcase is 14 watt, alloyed iron being 
 used. The flux is 0*25 megalines, and this requires 180 
 turns of wire for 100 volts choking E.M.F. The winding 
 space allows of the use of 3-mm. wire, to which 
 corresponds a resistance of 0*14 ohm and an ohmic loss 
 
110 
 
 TRANSFORMERS 
 
 of 14 watt. The excitation required for the air-gaps 
 is o'8 x 0*64 x 5000 = 2550 ampere-turns, or with 180 
 turns 1 4' i ampere crest value, corresponding to TO 
 ampere effective value. The power factor is 
 
 14+ 14 
 
 1000 
 
 = 0-028 
 
 FIG. 58. Ventilated choking coil. 
 
 so as to preserve the value of 8 correctly. 
 
 to which corre- 
 sponds an angle of 
 lag 
 
 < = 88 24' 
 
 The coil shown 
 in Fig. 57 being 
 of small power, no 
 special provision 
 need be made for 
 cooling. For large 
 power coils it is, 
 however, advisable 
 to provide air chan- 
 nels. Fig. 58 shows 
 a design which I 
 have found to take 
 up a large apparent 
 power per unit of 
 weight, and yet 
 keep fairly cool 
 when in continuous 
 use. 
 
 It is advisable to 
 put a hardwood 
 lining into the gaps 
 
CHAPTER VI 
 
 DESIGN OF A CORE TRANSFORMERBEST DISTRI- 
 BUTION OF COPPER LOSSES AT DIFFERENT 
 LOADS TIME CONSTANT FOR HEATING- 
 WEIGHT AND COST OF ACTIVE MATERIAL- 
 BEST DISTRIBUTION OF LOSSES TRANS- 
 FORMERS FOR A SPECIAL SERVICE TRANS- 
 FORMERS FOR POWER TRANSFORMERS FOR 
 LIGHTING ANNUAL EFFICIENCY ECONOMIC 
 IMPORTANCE OF SMALL LOSSES CONSTRUC- 
 TIVE DETAILS 
 
 Design of a core transformer. As an example of the 
 practical application of the formulae developed in the 
 preceding chapters we will now get out the design of a 
 2O-kw. transformer of the air-cooled core type, for a 
 secondary pressure of 160 volt on open circuit at the 
 usual frequency of 50. The primary pressure is 3120 
 volt, giving a transforming ratio of 19*5 to i. A trans- 
 former of this pressure rnay be used to supply lighting 
 current to 5o-volt metallic filament lamps which are 
 arranged in three circuits and balanced by an autotrans- 
 former, as will be explained in Chapter XII. The lamps 
 being three in series, require 150 volt, so that 10 volt 
 remain for covering ohmic losses in the transformer and 
 lamp circuits. 
 
 The coefficient c in formula (16) for the weight of 
 iron is about 8, if we use alloyed iron. This gives 
 170 kg. To get the side, d, of the core we may use 
 the formula 
 
 G = 6o(^+ o*2) 3 = 1 70 
 
 This gives d= 1*22 dm., or if we chamfer the corners 
 d= 1 2 '5 cm. We can now design the carcase and 
 
 &> 
 in 
 
I 12 
 
 TRANSFORMERS 
 
 410 
 
 8 
 
 determine its exact weight. The shape will be as shown 
 in Fig. 59. 
 
 To find approximately the cooling surface we assume 
 for the present that the outside diameter of the coils will 
 be 26 cm. and the inside diameter 15*6 cm. Of the 
 inside surface only about one-half can be considered as 
 available for cooling, whilst the whole of the outside 
 surface is of course effective. The total cooling surface 
 of the coils is 8800 sq. cm. The edgeways cooling 
 surface of the carcase is 2720, and to this has to be 
 
 added about 80 sq. cm. for the 
 flat surfaces, so that the total 
 cooling surface is 2800 sq. cm. 
 The area of the core, allowing 
 for the chamfered edges, is 1 30, 
 that of the yoke, which is 
 perfectly square, is 136. Allow- 
 ing an induction of 7900 in the 
 core (7550 in the yoke) we find 
 with alloyed iron a loss of 190 
 watt. This is permissible, 
 since it gives  r> d r> 
 
 P v = o, or -, - P v = o 
 agi dqi 
 
 Selecting the first, we have 
 
ii6 TRANSFORMERS 
 
 Since q^ = -- j- , we have also 
 4 
 
 d /K/i .g - K/ 2 
 
 -y- I- -- I? + 7 -- / 
 
 ^i \ f i (^-A 
 
 from which we find 
 
 the .condition for minimum total copper heat. It is equal 
 current density in both circuits. But since the mean 
 perimeter is the same in both circuits, and the number 
 of turns is inversely as the current, the volume of copper 
 is the same in both circuits. The loss being proportional 
 to current density and volume, we find that also in this 
 case,, the same as in the case of concentric winding, the 
 total loss is a minimum for equal copper heat in primary 
 and secondary. 
 
 In the example under consideration, we have chosen 
 cylindrical coils, and have assumed as a first approxima- 
 tion that the available winding space will be divided in 
 the proportion of 40 per cent, for the inner (secondary) 
 cylinder and 60 per cent, for the outer (primary) cylinder. 
 We must now investigate whether this division is in 
 conformity with the law just passed. The flux is 
 1 30 x 7900 = i *O2 7 . i o 6 . 
 
 To get 1 60 volt on open circuit on the secondary 
 we require 70 turns 
 
 ;^ 2 = 70 
 
 %=i365 
 
 If for these figures and the original assumption of 
 40 and 60 per cent, winding space we determine the size 
 of wire and the losses, we shall find that the loss in the 
 primary is greater than that in the secondary. The 
 40 : 60 division is, therefore, not correct. By a method 
 of trial and error, which need not be repeated here, we 
 find ultimately that the division in the ratio of 37:63 
 gives equality of losses. We thus find 
 
 Best radial depth of inner cylinder . 14 mm. 
 outer ,, . 24 ,, 
 
BEST DISTRIBUTION OF COPPER iij 
 
 We may now draw the coils, and determine from 
 the drawing the exact mean perimeter of each. This 
 gives 
 
 ^2 = 0*575 m. 77-1-0755 m. 
 
 The cross-section of wire may now be determined. 
 For fixing the length of the coils we have to consider 
 the height of the window in the iron frame (in our case 
 45 cm.), and leave sufficient space for clearance "and 'the 
 end flanges of the cylinders. The total space required 
 for these purposes is about 3^ cm., leaving 41-5 cm. net 
 length of coil. Each secondary coil must contain 35 
 turns of wire. If these were arranged in a single layer, 
 the wire would have to be wound on edge. Although 
 this presents no difficulty with naked wire which is after- 
 wards insulated by paper insertion, it is not so easy with 
 cotton-covered wire, and in this case it would be better 
 to wind the wire on the flat and make two layers, one 
 with 1 8 and the other with 17 turns. Since the space of 
 one turn is lost in crossing over from the lower to the 
 upper layer, we must arrange the width of the wire to be 
 not xVth, but T Vth of the net winding space. This gives 
 415/19 = 21*8 mm. The thickness of the wire is already 
 determined by the depth of winding, which we found 
 must be 14 mm. Allowing 0*5 mm. for the thickness 
 of covering (or i mm. in all), we find that the section of 
 the wire will be 6 x 20*8 mm. Since it is, however, 
 scarcely possible to lay on succeeding turns with mathe- 
 matical accuracy, it will be advisable to take the width a 
 little less, say 20 mm., so that the actual cross-section of 
 the wire becomes 6 x 20 = 120 sq. mm. The length 
 of winding is 70 x 0*575 40*5 m., and if we allow 0*5 
 m. for connections, we can take 4T m. as the basis oil 
 which to calculate the resistance of the secondary winding. 
 The formula for the resistance, taking rise of temperature 
 into account, is 
 
 D 0*02/2 
 
 R --^- 
 
 /, being the length in metre and q the cross-section in 
 square millimetre. We thus obtain 
 
 R 2 = 0*00682 
 
1 1 8 TRA NSFORMER S 
 
 A similar calculation made for the primary winding 
 shows that we have to use round wire of 3*1 mm. 
 diameter (covered to 3*67 mm.) in six layers of 122 
 turns, and one layer of ten turns on one and eleven turns 
 on the other limb. The length of wire is 
 
 /! = 1030 m. 
 
 and its resistance warm is 
 
 R! = 2-8 
 
 Losses at different loads. We have now all the data 
 required for calculating the losses at different loads. 
 They are given in the following table 
 
 Output in kw. . . .10 12 15 20 25 
 
 Secondary current, ampere 63 76 96 128 161 
 
 Primary current, ampere . 3*4 3*9 5 6*6 8*4 
 
 Total loss in copper, watt 59 Si 133 224 374 
 
 Loss in iron, watt . . 190 190 190 190 190 
 
 Total losses, watt . . 249 271 323 414 564 
 
 Efficiency, per cent. . . 97*6 97*8 977 98 97*8 
 
 Specific cooling surface of ) ^ r 
 
 .1 s \ 149 IOQ 66 36 23 
 
 coils, sq. cm. J 
 
 Temperature rise of coils) 
 
 if air cooled, deg. C. } 15 24 45 /o 
 
 The specific cooling surface of the carcase is 147, to 
 which corresponds a temperature of 44 C. 
 
 Time constant for heating. The time constant is 
 found from- 
 
 CT 
 P 
 
 where P is the lost power, in our case for a load of 
 20 kw., 190+224 = 414 watt, and C the number of 
 watt-seconds required to raise the temperature of iron 
 and copper by i C. if radiation be neglected. We have 
 178 kg. of iron and 112 kg. of copper; hence 
 
 C 4200 (178 x o'n + 112 x 0*093) = J 26000 
 
 /= 126000 _._45 = T 3600 seconds 
 414 
 
 t = hours 
 
WEIGHT AND COST OF ACTIVE MATERIAL 119 
 
 For the copper only the time constant is 2*4 hours. 
 If this transformer be required to work only four hours 
 every evening, the loss in the copper may be increased, 
 as shown on page 65, to 
 
 
 2-4 
 
 _ 
 
 P =224-5- 
 
 e - i 
 
 P = 224 X I '21 
 
 The output may therefore be 20^1*21 = 22 kw. with- 
 out exceeding the temperature rise of 45 C. 
 
 Weight and cost of active material, In designing 
 this transformer we have used stampings of alloyed iron. 
 Had we used ordinary transformer sheets we should, in 
 order to remain within the same temperature limit, have 
 been obliged to reduce the induction to B = 5600, thus 
 reducing the secondary terminal pressure to about 1 10 
 volt, and the output to 14 kw. Alloyed iron costs about 
 twice as much as ordinary transformer sheet, or, say, 
 i6d. against &d. per kg. Copper may be taken on an 
 average at is. 9^. per kg. The weight of active material 
 and its cost is as under 
 
 Quality of iron. 
 Ordinary. Alloyed. 
 Shillings. Shillings. 
 
 Weight of carcase . 178 kg. cost . 120 240 
 Weight of coils . 112 ,., ,, . 196 196 
 
 290 316 436 
 
 Output, kw. . . . . 14 20 
 
 Cost per kw. output . . . . 227 217 
 
 It will be seen from this table that it pays to use the 
 more expensive iron. 
 
 Best distribution of losses. In designing this trans- 
 former we paid no heed to the question whether the 
 losses between iron and copper are correctly distributed. 
 We designed mainly with a view to moderate and equal 
 temperature rise in both parts, and it so happens that 
 the loss in iron is not very different from that in copper. 
 Theoretical conditions demand that they should be equal, 
 or nearly equal. The latter is the case in the transformer 
 
120 TRANSFORMERS 
 
 under consideration. The proof of the rule for minimum 
 loss is as follows. Let a given transformer working on a 
 constant pressure circuit be loaded to different degrees 
 corresponding to various values of the primary current i. 
 Since primary and secondary current are at all loads 
 very nearly proportional, the total loss in the windings 
 will be correctly represented by Ri 2 , whilst the loss in 
 the iron is a constant quantity C. The efficiency is 
 
 ei cos -. = o. or 
 
 di 
 
 (ei cos  - 1 - 
 
 j> j L 
 
 
 18 21 33 
 17 21 36 
 
 19 22 31 
 
 
 21 33 44 
 
 20 35 50 
 
 20 28 36 
 
 It will be seen that for cheap power current the 
 choice lies between G and P, whilst for the more expen- 
 sive lighting current L is the best type. The differences 
 in annual working charges are not very great. This is 
 due to the use of alloyed iron ; had we used ordinary 
 transformer sheet in these designs the annual charges 
 and their differences would have come out larger. 
 
 Economic importance of small losses. Station engineers 
 generally reckon the cost of lost energy not at the selling- 
 price of the current, as we have done here, but at the so- 
 called engine-room cost, which is, of course, much lower. 
 In this connection it is interesting to notice that even if 
 lost energy be only reckoned at engine-room figures (say 
 about id. per kw.-h.), a transformer with large iron loss 
 
ECONOMIC IMPORTANCE OF SMALL LOSSES 129 
 
 FIG. 61. 20 kw. transformer. Scale I :6. 
 
1 30 TRANSFORMERS 
 
 is a heavy charge on the working expenses. Most of 
 the transformers now in use for lighting and general 
 purposes have been made some years ago, and may be 
 assumed to have from 2 to 3 per cent, iron loss. This 
 means that each kw. of transformer installed uses up 
 250 kw.-h. in iron heat annually, whereas a modern 
 transformer made with alloyed iron would only use up 
 about 80 kw.-h. By replacing the old with modern 
 transformers a saving of 170 kw.-h., or 145-. worth of 
 current per kw. installed, would annually be made. 
 Against this must be set the annual charge of, say, 10 
 per cent, on the capital outlay, which on an average 
 may be taken at 2 per kw. Of the 14^. saved 4^. 
 must therefore be set aside for the annual charge, 
 leaving a clear saving of icxr. per annum, so that after 
 four years the cost of the new transformers could be 
 completely written off. 
 
 Constructive details. After this digression into what 
 may be termed the financial side of transformer design, 
 we return to the particular 2O-kw. transformer for general 
 purposes dealt with in the beginning of this chapter. 
 The core with the coils in place is shown in Fig. 61. 
 This transformer is put into a perforated sheet-metal 
 case, and is therefore air cooled by natural draught. It 
 can with such a covering only be used indoors, and then 
 only in dry places. For use in damp places and out of 
 doors a perforated covering is of course inadmissible. 
 We must put the transformer into a tight case of cast- 
 iron. As this would greatly diminish the effectiveness of 
 the enclosed air as a cooling medium, we use oil as the 
 internal cooling medium, and provide the case with ribs 
 to increase the cooling effect of the external air. See 
 Figs. 62, 63 and 64. 
 
 In building up the carcase, the plates for the core and 
 yoke are cut to size and punched for the bolt-holes, then 
 laid together with an insertion of very thin paper. Some 
 makers use varnish instead of paper, but this is not so 
 reliable an insulation. Plates are now on the market 
 which have one side covered with a very thin insulating 
 film. These may be used without paper insertion. In 
 building up, the lower yoke and the two cores are first 
 
CONSTRUCTIVE DETAILS 
 
132 
 
 TRANSFORMERS 
 
 made up, the coils are then inserted, and lastly the plates 
 of the top yoke are put in. The coils are wound on 
 paper cylinders, which at their lower ends are provided 
 with flanges to prevent the coils slipping. In winding 
 the coils it is advisable to wrap each layer with a sheet of 
 thin paraffined calico, which is doubled back at the ends 
 so as to give additional insulation between adjacent layers. 
 The thickness of the cotton covering on the wire 
 depends on its diameter (or equivalent diameter if rect- 
 angular wire be used), the voltage, and the quality of the 
 
 FIG. 64. Plan of 20 kw. transformer. 
 
 cotton and number of coverings. There must at least 
 be two coverings, though treble covering with very fine 
 cotton is still better. For very stout wires braiding is 
 advisable. The thickness of the covering in millimetres 
 should not be less than 
 
 S = o'i3+o'o6^ (30) 
 
 when d is the diameter (or equivalent diameter) of the 
 naked wire in millimetres. The diameter of the covered 
 wire is then 
 
CONSTRUCTIVE DETAILS 133 
 
 Wire of large rectangular section may also be wound 
 naked, suitable strips of fibre or other insulating material 
 being wound in, or afterwards inserted. 
 
 The resistance of the coil must be calculated with 
 reference to its temperature ; as a first approximation, 
 based on a temperature of 75 C, the following formula 
 may be used 
 
 r> CTO2/ i 
 
 R = .. _ ohm 
 
 
 where / is the length of wire in metres and q its area in 
 square millimetres. 
 
 To promote dissipation of heat, the casing may, as 
 already mentioned, be provided with external ribs or gills. 
 Small internal ribs are also provided to hold the trans- 
 former securely. The main cover is fitted with a small 
 auxiliary cover to give access to the terminals without 
 the necessity of breaking the joint of the main cover. 
 The leading-in wires may be taken through stuffing- 
 boxes, as shown in Fig. 63, or they may be passed 
 through bushed holes which are afterwards cast out 
 with insulating compound. The latter arrangement is 
 generally adopted in large transformers. When the 
 pressure is very high the bushes take the form of long 
 glass or porcelain tubes. 
 
CHAPTER VII 
 
 DESIGN OF A SHELL TRANSFORMER FILL 
 FACTOR WINDING EFFICIENCY, WEIGHT 
 AND COST ENLARGING A DESIGN 
 
 Design of a shell transformer. As an example of how 
 to design a small air-cooled shell transformer we take 
 a 7 kw. transformer to give at v = 50 with 2000 volt on 
 the primary terminals 64 ampere at no volt on the 
 secondary terminals, or allowing for a moderate drop, 113 
 to 114 volt on open circuit. If we make the height of 
 the windows equal to the thickness d of the core and 
 their width 70 per cent, of the height, the total weight of 
 iron in kg. is for a depth of core c 
 
 G = 
 
 d and c being given in dm. Using alloyed iron, the 
 formula giving the approximate weight is 
 
 G=io- -?- .... (16) 
 
 A/ 
 
 V T r^r* 
 
 100 
 
 This gives for P = 7, G-8okg. and (Pc = 2'22. For a 
 core 15 cm. deep, the thickness would be 12*1 cm., or say 
 
 in round numbers 12 
 cm. Its area is 156 
 sq. cm. 
 
 Fig. 65 is a sketch 
 of the carcase, the 
 dimensions being 
 mm. The next point 
 to be determined is 
 __i the induction permis- 
 sible with regard to 
 
 
 
 
 o 
 
 ?-600 
 
 O 
 
 
 
 ''' 
 
 
 x 
 
 <^60-* 
 
 t 
 "4-84 > 
 
 _._120--i > 
 
 *--* 
 
 l* 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 i 
 
 i 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 - 408 * - 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 O 
 
 
 
 
 . 65. 
 
FILL FACTOR 135 
 
 temperature rise. In a small transformer the windows 
 have to be closely packed with wire and cannot contribute 
 to the cooling surface. The flat surface of the plates is 
 nearly worthless for cooling, so that we can only reckon 
 on the outer edge surface. This is 1670 sq. cm. Allowing 
 a temperature rise of 55 C. we get a specific cooling 
 surface of  corresponding to the frequency, so 
 that 
 
 ft) = 2TTV 
 
 From the definition it follows that a vector may be 
 displaced parallel to itself without ceasing to represent 
 the quantity correctly. Strictly considered, the length 
 of the vector should represent the crest value of the 
 magnitude ; its projection on the base line will then 
 represent the instantaneous value, and this will be 
 positive or negative accordingly as the projection lies to 
 one side or the other of that point on the base line which 
 corresponds to zero value. Sometimes it is convenient 
 to let the vector represent not the crest value, but the 
 effective value of the quantity. 
 This is permissible since the o 
 
 ratio between crest and effective 2 
 
 value is a constant for all quan- FlG> 6 8. -Conception of vectors. 
 tities, namely ^/ 2 > an d passing 
 
 from one to the other only means an alteration of the 
 scale in this ratio. 
 
 Vectors which represent different magnitudes having 
 the same phase must be drawn parallel to each other, 
 and if drawn from the same origin will lie upon each 
 other. Thus in Fig. 68 OI, ON, OX represent respectively 
 current, flux, and exciting force. They are co-phasal, 
 and for this reason drawn as parallel lines. They may 
 be drawn from the same origin so that all lie along OA. 
 The length of each will depend on the magnitude of the 
 quantity and the scale chosen to represent it. If we 
 select, for instance, the scale so that i mm. shall represent 
 i ampere, or i megaline or i ampere-turn, then the number 
 
 OX 
 
 of turns n will be represented by the ratio -=-=-> and the 
 
 OX 
 
 magnetic resistance R by the ratio -r- By altering 
 
 the scales for current and flux in these ratios it is obvious 
 that O A ~ OX may be made to represent not only ampere- 
 
144 TRANSFORMERS 
 
 turns, but also current and flux. In order that OA may 
 represent current we shall use a scale, the divisions of 
 which are not i mm. but n mm. apart, and for the flux 
 we must use a scale, the divisions of which are R mm. 
 apart. The value of R is found from the following 
 consideration. The well-known law of the magnetic 
 circuit is 
 
 TT _ 
 
 where H is the magnetic force, and / the length of path. 
 Let A be the area, B the induction, and p the perme 
 ability, then we have for the flux in megalines 
 
 N= " ! -X 
 o-8/i o 6 ~R 
 
 p. A 
 or for a magnetic circuit composed of different materials, 
 
 p. A 
 
 In a transformer the magnetic circuit consists of iron, 
 and if there are butt joints air. For 
 air /A is constant, namely i, but for iron 
 it varies with the induction. As, how- 
 ever, transformers are mostly worked at 
 a fixed pressure, and therefore at a 
 constant induction, R will also be a 
 constant, and we are therefore justified 
 in using the same vector for flux and 
 exciting force, provided we alter the 
 
 PIG. 69. E.M.F. , & 1-1 ir v u 
 
 and current vector, scale accordingly. If X be given not 
 as a crest value, but as an effective 
 value, we have 
 
 Let, in Fig. 69, OE represent the crest value of the 
 E.M.F. impressed on a circuit, for instance on the primary 
 terminals of a transformer, and OI the crest value of the 
 
APPLICATION TO A TRANSFORMER 145 
 
 current. The phase difference is $, and if the vectors 
 rotate as shown by the arrow, the current lags and  2 > the difference being in the present case very 
 marked, because for the sake of greater clearness we 
 have exaggerated all losses and assumed too large an 
 exciting force. If the vectors represent effective values, 
 the following relations obtain : 
 
 o 
 
 Power supplied equals . . . e^ cos 
 2 . 
 This is given by the vector O^. 
 
 One component must be equal and opposite O^, and 
 one component must be provided to overcome the ohmic 
 resistance. Let the vector of the latter be Oa. 
 
 By adding these three components graphically we 
 obtain the point e kl . Oe kl is the vector of the E M.F. 
 supplied to the primary terminals. A glance at the dia- 
 gram shows that e kl is greater than e k ^ the difference 
 being the more marked the greater are the ohmic resist- 
 ances and the E.M.F.s of self-induction in the two 
 windings. In both respects the diagram Fig. 78 has 
 been exaggerated, so that the influence of each part may 
 be more clearly seen. 
 
 It is interesting to investigate the case of a transformer 
 the secondary terminals of which are short-circuited by 
 a stout copper wire and amperemeter, thereby making 
 ^ 2 = o. We assume the primary E.M.F. to be so 
 adjusted that this amperemeter shows the normal second- 
 ary current corresponding to full load under normal 
 working conditions. The diagram then assumes the 
 
DIAGRAM OF A TRANSFORMER 
 
 155 
 
 form shown in Fig. 78. The lettering is the same as in 
 FiV. 77. It will be seen from this diagram that although 
 
 o * o o 
 
 no pressure is obtained at the secondary terminals, a 
 pressure equal to e kl must be supplied to the primary 
 terminals in order that the current z* 2 may flow through 
 the short circuit. 
 
 If, as is always the case in modern transformers of 
 good design, the resistance of the windings is very small, 
 and the no-load current t is only a very small fraction of 
 /!, then z' 2 and i will lie very nearly in a straight line, and 
 e l and 2 will lie very nearly in a straight line. 
 
 With a symmetrical arrangement between the two 
 windings (and the assump- 
 tion that the number of 
 turns is the same in both) 
 we have e^ e^ and 
 
 The E.M.F. necessary 
 to overcome self-induction 
 and ohmic resistance can 
 thus be found by a very 
 simple experiment. We 
 short-circuit the secondary 
 terminals by means of an 
 amperemeter (having itself 
 as little induction as pos- 
 sible), and supply the 
 
 FIG. 78. Vector diagram for short- 
 circuited secondary. 
 
 primary terminals with current of normal frequency and 
 such E.M.F, that the normal secondary current is 
 indicated on the amperemeter. One-half the E.M.F. 
 supplied to the primary equals the E.M.F. required for 
 the primary winding. The E.M.F. required for the 
 secondary winding is equal to this value divided by the 
 transforming ratio. Take as an example the case of a 10 
 kw. transformer wound for a ratio of 2000 volt to 100 volt. 
 In testing this transformer, as above explained, it is 
 found that 100 volt must be supplied on the primary at 
 v=5o in order that 100 ampere may be driven through 
 the short-circuit. We have then e l = 50 and e^ = 2*5. 
 The E.M.F. has two components. One is a wattless 
 
156 TRANSFORMERS 
 
 component at right angles to the current, and is due to 
 self-induction, and the other is in phase with the current, 
 and is due to resistance. There may be another watt 
 component due to eddy current losses in the copper or 
 other metal parts including the carcase. Such eddy 
 currents may be produced by the leakage field passing 
 laterally through the wires, plates, or other metal parts. 
 Not to complicate the investigation, we neglect the (in 
 any case small) influence of such eddies for the present. 
 We also assume for the present that on short-circuit 
 the currents are inversely proportional to the respective 
 numbers of turns. The watt component of impressed 
 primary E.M.F. is then simply the product of current 
 and resistance taken for both windings. 
 
 As we measure the pressure in the primary circuit 
 and the current in the secondary, R 2 z' 2 has to be reduced 
 to the primary. We have therefore the watt component 
 of the impressed E.M.F. 
 
 n l , -D n l 
 
 ! - 2 + R 2 - 
 
 n, n 2 
 
 Since the wattless component must be at right angles 
 to e r , and since both together give the total impressed 
 E.M.F. e , we find the wattless component e^ that is, the 
 E.M.F. of self-induction 
 
 e^ may be divided into two parts inversely proportional 
 to the numbers of turns, so that we get the E.M.F. of 
 self-induction separately for each winding. 
 
 Voltage drop. If by making the experiment above 
 described we have found how much E.M.F. is produced 
 by magnetic leakage in each coil, we can use this informa- 
 tion to determine the voltage drop at various loads. In 
 this determination it is convenient and permissible to 
 assume exact opposition in the phases of primary and 
 secondary current. Modern transformers with closed 
 magnetic circuit require so little magnetising current, 
 that even at load this assumption is very nearly true. 
 Let, in Fig. 79, A represent the pressure at the secondary 
 terminals, AB the ohmic loss of pressure, BC = , 2 the 
 
VOLTAGE DROP 
 
 157 
 
 E.M.F. due to self-induction; and therefore OC = 2 the 
 E.M.F. induced in the secondary. Let the transforming 
 ratio be reduced to unity, then OC = e l is also the E.M.F. 
 induced in the primary, and with symmetrical windings 
 CD = BC the E.M.F. of self-induction in the primary, 
 so that e sl = e s2 . The ohmic voltage loss in the primary 
 is DE = AB if the losses are equally divided between 
 the two windings as required by a good design. The 
 line joining A, C and E is therefore a straight line, and 
 its inclination to the vector of secondary terminal pressure 
 is the same for all loads. At a smaller load, for instance, 
 producing the ohmic loss A'B the terminal pressure 
 would be OA' in the secondary and OE' in the primary. 
 
 FIG. 80. 
 
 FIG. 79. 
 
 The ratio of the length of the lines AE and A'E' is 
 the same as that of the lines AB and A'B, and the 
 length of the line AE is directly proportional to the 
 current. 
 
 Let us now assume that we are able to vary the 
 primary E.M.F. in any way which may be required to 
 keep the pressure at the secondary terminals constant 
 for all loads. We draw the line AE (Fig. 80) for full 
 current, and make an ampere scale which corresponds 
 with this length, then we can, by using this scale, mark 
 off on the line AE the points E', E", etc., corresponding 
 to other currents, and thus find the primary E.M.F. 
 vector OE', OE", etc., corresponding to these currents. 
 It is thus possible to determine the primary E.M.F. as 
 
i 5 8 
 
 TRANSFORMERS 
 
 a function of the load, if the secondary terminal pressure 
 is to be a constant. 
 
 This is however not the case generally met with 
 in practice. As a rule the E.M.F. in the primary or 
 supply-circuit is constant, and it is required to find the 
 secondary terminal pressure at various currents. This 
 problem can also be solved graphically in a very simple 
 manner. 
 
 Graphic determination of drop. It has already been 
 shown that in all the triangles OAE, OA'E', etc., the 
 obtuse angle at A, A', etc., is the same. The longest 
 
 side of the triangle represents the 
 E.M.F. impressed on the primary, 
 and the shortest side the current 
 in the secondary. We may now 
 imagine all the triangles in Fig. 80 
 so enlarged or reduced that all 
 the points E lie on a circle de- 
 scribed round O as centre, with 
 a radius equal to the impressed 
 E.M.F. Let OE in Fig. 81 
 represent this E.M.F. at full load 
 (current represented to a suitable 
 scale by the lengths AE) and 
 E', E" the positions of E for 
 smaller loads, then the length 
 OA, OA', OA", etc., gives the 
 corresponding pressures at the 
 
 secondary terminals. As a matter of convenience we 
 may also plot the secondary current on a horizontal o\ 
 to a suitable scale, and find the points E by projection 
 from the points I, as shown by dotted lines. 
 
 Let us now apply this method to our previous 
 example of a 10 kw. transformer. We have assumed 
 that 100 volt must be impressed on the primary in order 
 to produce 100 ampere in the short-circuited secondary ; 
 that is, 5 per cent, of the normal primary voltage. Let 
 us further assume that the watt component as calculated 
 from resistance measurements has been found to be 
 2 per cent. The wattless component is therefore 
 
 2 2 = 4'58 percent. 
 
 FIG. 81. 
 
VOLTAGE DROP 159 
 
 The slope of the line AE in Fig. 80 is 2 in 4*58, 
 and its length is 5, whilst the length OA is 100. The 
 angle at O is therefore very acute, and the difference 
 between OA and OE, that is, the drop at full current and 
 a non-inductive load, is 2 per cent. At half-load it would 
 be i per cent., and so on. If the transformer had con- 
 siderably more leakage, say 20 per cent, instead of 4*58 
 per cent, then the drop, even at non-inductive load, would 
 be appreciably greater than that given by ohmic resist- 
 ance. In such a case the construction shown in Fig. 81 
 may be applied. The ampere-load would be plotted on 
 the horizontal o\ by using a scale on which ol represents 
 100 ampere, and by projecting the corresponding points, 
 first to the circle and then to the vertical parallel to EA, 
 we find the terminal volt OA', OA", etc. This con- 
 struction, carried out for various loads, gives the 
 following results, the impressed E.M.F. being constant, 
 namely, 2076 volt. 
 
 Ampere in secondary o 25 50 75 100 200 
 Terminal pressure 103*8 103-2 102-35 101*3 100 92 
 
 The drop between no load and full load is thus 3*8 volt. 
 The drop between full load and 100 per cent, over load 
 (which the transformer is perfectly able to stand for a 
 short time) is 8 volt more, or a total between no load 
 and double the normal full load of 1 1 *8 volt. This drop 
 is of course too great for practical purposes. It is due 
 to the large inductance we have assumed, merely in order 
 to explain the graphic method. 
 
 Up to the present we have assumed that the load is 
 non-inductive. It remains yet to extend the investigation 
 to cases in which the secondary circuit has also self- 
 induction, or capacity, or both. Self-induction is intro- 
 duced, if the secondary current is used for feeding motors 
 or arc lamps, in which cases there is developed an E.M.F. 
 at right angles to the current. The pressure at the 
 secondary terminals must therefore have a component 
 equal and opposite to this E.M.F. of self-induction, and 
 this component must be in advance over the current by 
 90. Let in Fig. 82 OA represent the secondary current, 
 OB the power component of the secondary pressure, and 
 
i6o 
 
 TRANSFORMERS 
 
 J. 
 
 FIG. 82. 
 
 OC the counter E.M.F. produced by self-induction. 
 The secondary pressure is then represented by the vector 
 OD, which advances over the current by the angle 
 changes E 
 takes different positions on the circle of primary E.M.F., 
 and the locus of B must therefore also be a circle of the 
 
TRANSFORMERS 
 
 same radius, the centre of which has relatively to O the 
 same displacement as B has to E. 
 
 Let in Fig. 92 the vertical represent the current 
 vector, OS the E.M.F. of self-induction at full current, 
 and So the ohmic loss at full current in both windings ; 
 then O0 is equal and parallel with EB of Fig. 85, and 
 o is the centre of the second circle just mentioned. 
 For a positive phase difference (current lagging behind 
 E.M.F.) the secondary terminal pressure OB is smaller 
 than OE, its value at no load. For a negative phase 
 difference ^ (current leading before the E.M.F.) the 
 secondary terminal pressure OB X is greater than its value 
 at no load. With a certain negative phase difference . The corresponding position of the vector of 
 E.M.F. is OE, and the terminal pressure which we scale 
 off on OE is 187 volt. In a similar manner we determine 
 the terminal pressure for all other values of cos (p. The 
 result is given in the following table. 
 
 60 kw.-transformer 3000 : 200 volt on open circuit. 
 
 Pressure at secondary terminals with 300 ampere in 
 
 FIG. 93. 
 
 secondary and power factors varying from TOO to 50 per 
 cent. 
 
 Power factor in per cent. 100 99 90 80 70 60 50 
 With leading current . 197 200 205 207 210 212 213 
 With lagging current . 197 195 190 188 187 186 185 
 
 If used on a glow-lamp circuit this transformer would 
 at full load have a drop of only ij per cent. ; if used 
 on a circuit containing arc lamps or motors the power 
 factor of which is about 070 to o'So, the drop would be 
 approximately 6 per cent. 
 
 The diagram, Fig. 93, leads to some interesting deduc- 
 tions. In the majority of cases the circuit has, not 
 capacity, but inductance, and the following remarks apply 
 to these cases, that is to say, to the left-hand side of the 
 
GRAPHIC DETERMINATION OF DROP 173 
 
 diagram. If we could build a transformer which has 
 absolutely no magnetic leakage, then OS would be zero, 
 and o would lie vertically above O. The inner circle 
 would then approach the outer circle more closely as 
 we go to the left. In other words, the drop would be 
 greatest for an inductionless, and smaller for an inductive, 
 resistance. This case is, however, unattainable in practice, 
 for we can never reduce magnetic leakage to zero. The 
 inductance produced by magnetic leakage can, however, 
 with a careful design, be made very small, especially 
 for low periodicities. Imagine that we have reduced the 
 inductance so far as to be equal to the resistance, then 
 OS = So, and Oo includes with OA an angle of 45. 
 The distance between the two circles would then be 
 approximately the same for all values of q>. We should 
 thus obtain a transformer which has approximately the 
 same drop for all values of the power factor. 
 
 As a rule, the reactance is, however, greater than the 
 resistance, and the two circles diverge towards the left. 
 As a consequence the drop increases as the power factor 
 decreases. If the same transformer is used for a high 
 and low frequency, the pressure at the secondary ter- 
 minals will at full current be lower in the former case. 
 The E.M.F. of self-induction is for both windings, 
 
 OS = 2 X 
 
 that is to say, OS is proportional to v. The higher the 
 frequency, the greater is the divergence between the two 
 circles. It must also be borne in mind that the power 
 factor of the apparatus to which the transformer supplies 
 current (motors or arc-lamps) is lower at the higher 
 frequency, and in consequence the vector of E.M.F. in 
 our diagram is shifted the more to the left the higher 
 the frequency. Both causes conspire to increase the 
 drop. If then the transformer is intended to feed, not 
 only glow-lamps, but also motors and arc-lamps, the 
 frequency should be chosen as small as compatible with 
 the proper working of alternating current arcs (45 to 50 
 complete cycles per second). This frequency is also 
 advisable on account of certain reasons connected with 
 the design of non-synchronous motors. 
 
174 
 
 TRANSFORMERS 
 
 Drop diagram simplified. The 60 kw. transformer 
 here chosen as an example has an inductive drop of over 
 8 per cent. This is rather more than usual in a good 
 design, but it was necessary to assume -so large a drop in 
 order to make the diagram, Fig. 93, distinctive. In well- 
 designed large transformers the inductive drop is generally 
 under 4 per cent., and then the graphic construction, Fig. 
 93, must be made on a very large-scale to get accurate 
 results. Even then the elasticity of the compasses with 
 which we draw the circles is a source of error. To 
 obtain the drop we can modify the construction so as 
 
 to make the drawing of 
 the circles superfluous. 
 If the sides of the tri- 
 angle OS0 are very small 
 as compared with OE, 
 then a line drawn from 
 o to E will be very nearly 
 parallel to OE, and the 
 drop will be very nearly 
 equal to the piece cut off 
 on 0E by a perpendicular 
 dropped from O on to it. 
 The triangle OS0 may 
 then be drawn to any 
 convenient scale, and the 
 drop found as shown in 
 Fi g- 94- O is, as before, 
 the impressed primary 
 E.M.F. at short circuit and full current; So = e r is the 
 ohmic drop, including eddy current losses, as explained 
 below, and OS = ^ is the calculated inductive drop. 
 Draw vector 0E under the given phase angle 
 . . . . (31) 
 
 Correction for eddy current losses. There remains 
 still a slight correction to be made. On p. 156 it was 
 
 FIG. 94 . 
 
CORRECTION FOR EDDY CURRENT LOSSES 175 
 
 mentioned that the watt component of the primary 
 impressed E.M.F. may not only be due to ohmic resist- 
 ance, but also to certain losses caused by eddy currents. 
 In consequence e r will be slightly greater than calculated 
 from the ohmic resistance. To find the true value of e r 
 we must use a wattmeter in the primary circuit, and 
 divide its indication by the secondary current. The 
 correction is small, and if a wattmeter is not available we 
 can approximate it by measuring, not only the secondary 
 current z' 2 , but also the primary current z lt and calculating 
 e r from 
 
CHAPTER IX 
 
 CALCULATION OF INDUCTIVE DROP THE IN- 
 FLUENCE OF FREQUENCY ON DROP THE 
 INFLUENCE OF FREQUENCY ON OUTPUT- 
 EQUIVALENT COILS THE SELF-INDUCTION 
 OF A TRANSFORMER WORKING CONDITION 
 REPRESENTED BY VECTOR DIAGRAM CON- 
 STANT CURRENT TRANSFORMER 
 
 Calculation of inductive drop. The inductive drop being 
 due to the interlinking of the leakage field with the 
 windings, we can approximately pre-determine it from 
 the drawing of a transformer by mapping out the leakage 
 field in relation to the coils. Such a method can, how- 
 ever, only yield qualitative, not quantitative results, as 
 we have no means of determining exactly wh'at the flux 
 density is in any given point. By applying in a general 
 way the laws of magnetic circuits we can compare 
 different arrangements and say what details will influence 
 the drop and in what ratio, but we cannot calculate the 
 absolute value of the drop. To get quantitative results 
 we must fall back on experiments. The method of 
 investigation is then as follows. First we determine 
 the general principles of interlinkage between leakage 
 flux and winding without assigning to the resulting 
 E.M.F. a definite value; then we apply the formulae 
 thus developed to definite cases investigated experi- 
 mentally and obtain coefficients by which the formulae 
 become applicable quantitatively. 
 
 We investigate first cylindrical coils and then sand- 
 wiched coils. Let, in Pig. 95, I and II represent the 
 cross-section of the two co-axial coils, the radial depth 
 of winding being a^ and # 2 respectively, and the length of 
 
 176 
 
CALCULATION OF INDUCTIVE DROP 177 
 
 the coils /. Let the secondary coil 1 1 be nearest the iron. 
 Leakage lines pass through the space b between the two 
 windings, and are of the general shape shown by the 
 dotted lines. The lines surrounding I pass wholly 
 through air, and have therefore to overcome a greater 
 magnetic reluctance than the lines surrounding II, which 
 pass partly through iron. The ampere-turns in both 
 coils being practically equal, the stray field of II will 
 therefore be stronger than that of I. In order to be 
 able to treat the problem mathematically we shall make 
 the assumption that the two currents have a phase 
 difference of 180 and that the ampere-turns are equal. 
 Both assumptions are very nearly correct. We shall 
 further assume that neither the 
 yoke nor the other core has a 
 material influence on the shape 
 of the stray field, which we take 
 to be distributed symmetrically 
 round the axis of the coils. 
 There must then be a boundary 
 surface of cylindrical shape be- 
 tween the two fields, which 
 passes through the space b, and 
 is distant ^ from the inner sur- 
 face of coil I, and A 2 from the 
 outer surface of coil II. Where 
 precisely this boundary is, we 
 cannot tell. All we know is 
 that b x < 4 because of the 
 presence of the iron on the right of II. 
 
 Let % and ;/, be the number of turns, / the perimeter 
 of the boundary, and 7 the number of turns per unit 
 radial depth of II. The ordinates of the shaded area 
 represent, according to the scale chosen, either ampere- 
 turns or induction. In the space b both are maxima, 
 and at the boundaries of the coils both are zero. In 
 an elementary strip of II having the radial depth da the 
 number of turns is 
 
 dn = yda 
 With these turns are interlinked all those lines of 
 
 FIG. 95. Leakage of cylindrical 
 winding. 
 
 12 
 
1 78 TRANSFORMERS 
 
 force represented by the shaded area between Bj and B. 
 The corresponding flux is 
 
 and the E.M.F.- 
 
 de = 'v l 
 
 The total E.M.F. self-induced in II is the integral 
 of this expression taken between the limits a = o and 
 a = # 2 , or 
 
 Oo 
 
 e. = 
 
 &,Btf 2 +y (# 2 - 
 
 BTJ 
 i 15 T) a T1 
 
 bince - = or B 1 = B 
 
 d #2 ^2 
 
 we can write 
 
 B + B! i 
 
 2 \ 2 
 
 B / 2 
 
 -(/ 
 
 Since ya. 2 is nothing else than the total number of turns 
 in II, and B is proportional to- 2 - = - 2 (X 2 being the 
 
 crest value of the ampere-turns in II), we find the 
 following expression for the self-induced E.M.F. in II 
 
 / 
 where / 2 is a coefficient to be found by experiment. In 
 
CALCULATION OF INDUCTIVE DROP 179 
 
 the same way we have for the E.M.F. of self-induction 
 in I- 
 
 The total induced E.M.F. due to the main flux < being 
 
 E = 4'44v;z< 
 we find the ratio of leakae to useful E.M.F. 
 
 ^ _ / 22 , 
 
 -- 7 " 
 
 2 $ 
 
 e l _ /^ 
 
 ET - 
 
 It is obvious that /i 2 , but as we are only concerned 
 with the sum of the ratios of e and E we may introduce 
 a mean value for these coefficients and call it k. Since 
 Xj = X 2 we then have the same fraction in both equations 
 and can add the terms in brackets. Thus 6 1 and b^ are 
 eliminated, and it is immaterial that we do not know their 
 relative values. All we know is that their sum is b, and 
 that suffices. We thus find the following expression for 
 the leakage E.M.F. as a percentage 
 
 . . . (.i, 
 
 if by e s we denote the total inductive drop reduced to 
 one circuit, and by e the useful E.M.F. induced in the 
 same circuit, both being effective values. 
 
 From tests made on various transformers 1 I found 
 for k the average value io~ 3 if X is the effective value 
 of ampere-turns in one coil in units of 1000, and < the 
 main flux in megalines 
 
 Percentage drop^o-i-h 12 (33) 
 
 $\ 3 // 
 
 In this formula the dimensions are to be inserted in cm. 
 The symbols have the following meaning 
 
 1 Elektrotechnische Zeitschrift, 1898, No. 15. 
 
i So 
 
 TRANSFORMERS 
 
 X represents effective ampere-turns in one coil on one 
 
 limb in units of 1000. 
 < represents megalines of useful flux passing through 
 
 both coils. 
 b is the radial space (copper to copper) between the 
 
 two coils. 
 
 #! and # 2 represent the radial depths of the coils. 
 / is the mean perimeter of the two coils. 
 / is the length of the coils. 
 
 In the transformer designed in Chapter VI we have 
 for an output of 20 kw., that is 128 ampere in the 
 secondary 
 
 v ^ x 128 
 
 X=- - =4*48 and (b= 1*027 
 
 1000 
 
 #! = 2*4 ; a 2 = i '4 ; b = 0*9 ; /= 41 ; p = 66. 
 
 In this transformer the inductive drop will be a little 
 
 over i J per cent. Since the 
 ohmic drop is only about i|- 
 per cent., the total drop with 
 128 ampere can under no 
 circumstance exceed 2 per 
 cent. This transformer may 
 therefore be used on a com- 
 bined service for light and 
 power. 
 
 In large transformers for 
 high pressure the inductive 
 drop may come out greater 
 
 than in the present example ; to reduce it to some- 
 thing less than half we need only arrange the winding 
 of one circuit in two concentric cylinders and sandwich 
 the coil of the other circuit between them. If the 
 windings are arranged in flat discs as shown in Fig. 96, 
 the same reasoning may be applied as with cylindrical 
 coils, but we must remember that for intermediate discs 
 the zero value of B lies in the plane which divides 
 each disc into two equal parts, so that the ampere- 
 turns producing maximum B are one-half of the total 
 ampere-turns in each disc. Only in the end discs which 
 lie against the two yokes will the zero value of B 
 
 FIG. 96. Leakage of disc-winding. 
 
CALCULATION OF INDUCTIVE DROP 181 
 
 coincide with the outer boundary of the disc, and in 
 these cases the full value of X must be taken. To allow 
 for this circumstance we reason as follows. Let u be the 
 total number of discs on one core, that is, the sum of 
 primary and secondary discs, then u 2 discs will have 
 
 X 
 
 to be counted with ampere-turns, and 2 discs with X 
 
 ampere-turns. The average is 
 
 2 U 
 
 In the formula for the percentage drop we shall 
 therefore have to take for the coefficient, not o'i, but 0*05 
 
 times - ~, and only half the values for a^ and a z , giving 
 Percentage drop - 0*05 X (^-^\(b + a -l^t . . (34) 
 
 / being the mean perimeter of the coils and / their 
 radial depth.- X represents the effective ampere-turns 
 of one disc in units of 1000 and < the useful flux in 
 megalines. 
 
 The formula for the percentage drop has been 
 deduced for a core transformer, and it is not at first sight 
 obvious whether we may also apply it to shell trans- 
 formers. To test this matter experimentally, Mr. Moel- 
 linger l has wound the same carcase in three different 
 ways the transforming ratio being in all cases i : i and 
 measured the inductive drop at the same load. 
 
 Case I. One primary and one secondary coil. 
 
 Case II. Two primary coils with one secondary coil 
 
 between them. 
 Case III. Three primary coils and two secondary 
 
 coils between them. 
 
 By using the formula 
 
 Percentage drop = & 
 
 1 Elektrotechnische Zeitschrift, 1898, No. 15. 
 
1 82 TRANSFORMERS 
 
 in each case we can find the value of k for intermediate 
 coils and end coils. The values found were 0*05 and 
 0*15 respectively. The agreement between experimental 
 and calculated results is fairly good, as will be seen from 
 the following table 
 
 Case I Case II Case III 
 
 Percentage drop measured 430 196 327 
 Percentage drop calculated 426 191 34 
 
 According to Moellinger's experiments the end coils 
 produce three times as much leakage as intermediate 
 coils. According to our theory they should only produce 
 twice as much. Accepting, however, the experimental 
 results as substantially correct, we can, in order to 
 simplify the calculation, determine the coefficient k so 
 as to be applicable to all coils alike. According to 
 American practice the end coils are made half as thick 
 
 J 
 
 as intermediate coils, and they carry only ampere-turns. 
 
 The average value of k, which we will call k s , can thus 
 be found from 
 
 V 
 
 2 x 3/ + (u - 2)/X = z// s X 
 
 X being the excitation given by one intermediate coil 
 and u the total number of coils in both circuits. 
 
 u 
 We have thus 
 
 Percentage drop = o-o 5 *t ' * 
 
 Percentage drop = k, |(<} + *+') . . . (35) 
 
 where b is the distance of copper to copper between a 
 primary and its neighbouring secondary coil ; a is the 
 thickness of a primary intermediate coil (or twice the 
 thickness of a primary end coil), a 2 the same for the 
 secondary circuit, and X the exciting force of one inter- 
 mediate coil. The value of k s may be taken from the 
 following table 
 
THE INFLUENCE OF FREQUENCY ON DROP 183 
 
 One primary full coil and two secondary 
 
 half coils .......... k s 0*067 
 
 Two primary full coils, one secondary 
 
 full coil, and two secondary half coils . k s = 0*060 
 
 Three primary full coils, two secondary 
 
 full coils, and two secondary half coils . ^ = 0*058 
 
 The influence of frequency on drop. Imagine one 
 and , the same transformer used alternately on circuits 
 of higher and lower frequency. For the same heating 
 limit in the copper the currents will remain unchanged. 
 The inductive drop is inversely proportional to the flux, 
 and therefore also inversely proportional to B, the useful 
 induction. Now we have to distinguish between two 
 cases. In one the E.M.F. remains unchanged, so that 
 the transformer gives the same output at the high and 
 low frequency ; and the other, where the E.M.F. at the 
 lower frequency is limited by the condition that the iron 
 heat shall be the same as at the higher frequency. In 
 the first case we have vB = constant, and in the second 
 case vB* = constant, where x is an exponent the value of 
 which may be found from the curves Figs. 9 to ir, 
 representing the relations between frequency, induction 
 and losses by hysteresis and eddy currents. For a given 
 transformer and the same output the inductive percentage 
 drop is 
 
 or, since < and v are inversely proportional 
 
 D = cv 
 
 The drop is reduced in the same ratio as we diminish the 
 frequency. But the iron heat will increase. It is pro- 
 
 portional to vB^ or to = v l -* = _ 
 
 x x 
 
 We may take 1*63 as an average value of x, so that if 
 P A is the iron heat at the frequency v, the iron heat at 
 V L will be 
 
 O'63 
 
 P - P ( 
 
 1 //i - A M - 
 
1 84 TRANSFORMERS 
 
 Thus halving the frequency whilst keeping the E.M.F. 
 constant will increase the iron heat by about 55 per 
 cent. 
 
 In the second case we assume that an increase of 
 iron heat is inadmissible. We must then drop the 
 inductions at the lower frequency and be content with a 
 smaller output. From 
 
 vB* = ^ or B= ( 
 we find 
 
 D = t#* 
 which may also be written in the form 
 
 ='.D-. . (36) 
 
 This expression is precisely of the same form as that 
 which gives loss in iron at constant frequency but 
 varying induction, namely 
 
 We need not know the precise value of x. If we 
 represent lost power and induction by a curve, such as 
 Fig. n, the same curve with the scales suitably changed 
 will also represent the relation between frequency and 
 drop. Thus, let in a given transformer of v = 50 the 
 drop be 2 per cent., the induction 6000, and the loss 0*85 
 watt per kg., then we have 
 
 B = 6000 D = 2 Ratio 3000 : i 
 
 W-o-85 v = 5o ,, i : 587 
 
 To half the frequency corresponds a loss of -5 = 
 
 5^7 
 
 0*425, and to this corresponds 6 = 3750, which, divided 
 by 3000, gives D= 1*25. The curve of iron losses may 
 thus be used to determine the inductive drop at various 
 frequencies. Taking a 5o-frequency transformer with 
 2 per cent, inductive drop as normal, its performance on 
 
INFLUENCE OF FREQUENCY ON OUTPUT 185 
 
 circuits of other frequency found from the curve, Fig. 1 1, 
 will for the same heating be as under 
 
 Frequency .... 15 25 50 75 100 
 Inductive drop % . . o'88 1*25 2 2*6 3*1 
 Output ..... 60 77 100 113 125 
 
 Influence of frequency on output. In this table a 
 line has been added to show how the output increases 
 with the frequency. For equal copper heat at all fre- 
 quencies the currents remain constant. The output is 
 therefore proportional to vB, and B is found from the 
 condition that the iron heat shall be constant. Let W 
 be the iron loss per kg. at v frequency and induction B, 
 then for the induction B! we have the loss W and for 
 equal heating we have 
 
 1} 
 
 From the curve we find the corresponding value of 
 and the output is 
 
 If we assume that the curve (Fig. n) may be 
 represented over short sections by 
 
 then for equal heating we have 
 
 V 
 
 v -. 0-385 
 
 V 
 
 The weight of iron, as far as it is influenced by the 
 frequency, will therefore be inversely proportional to the 
 '3 8 5 power of the frequency. As this is, however, 
 
1 86 TRANSFORMERS 
 
 an inconvenient exponent, we may for frequencies 
 which do not greatly differ from the standard frequency 
 of 50 substitute the exponent 0*5, that is, the square root 
 of the frequency ; and this can be taken on the slide 
 rule. Thus we get the formula given on page 74 for 
 the weight of the carcase 
 
 10) 
 
 which may be used if the frequency lies between 40 and 
 60. The error introduced by substituting the square 
 root for the power 0*385 is only 2 to 3 per cent. The 
 ninth root of the power in the denominator is intended 
 to account for the better fill factor obtainable in larger 
 transformers. The formula is only valid for small and 
 medium size transformers ; say up to 100 kw. In larger 
 sizes the influence of the better fill factor and possibility 
 of better cooling result in a considerable reduction of 
 weight, as may be seen from the example given in 
 Chapter VII. ' 
 
 Equivalent Coils. The working condition of a trans- 
 former, such as can practically be built, may be repre- 
 sented by a perfect transformer to which are added 
 certain coils to represent the imperfections of the actual 
 transformer. These coils, having resistance and induct- 
 ance, may be called "equivalent coils." By "perfect 
 transformer " I mean a transformer having no losses, no 
 leakage, and requiring no magnetising current. The 
 object of introducing the conception of the perfect trans- 
 former worsened by equivalent coils so as to be reduced 
 to the condition of the practically possible transformer is 
 to simplify the analytical and graphical, treatment of the 
 latter. In Chapter VIII we have already made use of 
 this conception, though without specifically emphasising 
 it. By combining vectors we have in reality combined 
 the E.M.F.s of the perfect transformer and its equivalent 
 coils. It will, however, be useful to investigate this 
 matter somewhat more in detail. 
 
 Let, in Fig. 97, T represent the perfect transformer. 
 
EQUIVALENT COILS 
 
 187 
 
 Its terminals are i, i and 2, 2. Within these we have 
 on the primary side a coil R x having only resistance, and 
 a coil 1^ having only self-induction, both in series with 
 the primary winding. On the secondary side we have 
 similar coils. To represent the constant iron losses we 
 have a resistance-coil R 7i placed as a shunt to the 
 primary and to represent the wattless component of 
 the magnetising current an inductance-coil L^ placed 
 similarly. 
 
 If E! is the primary supply voltage, P /4 the iron loss, 
 
 and i^ the wattless component of the magnetising current, 
 and i h the watt component, we have 
 
 = R t = 
 
 or 
 
 R! and R 2 are the ohmic resistances of the windings, 
 and L! and L 2 the inductances, which can be found from 
 the inductive drop. Suppose we have by experiment 
 or calculation found the total inductive drop to be 2p per 
 cent, of the primary E.M.F., then by assigning one-half 
 of it to each winding we have 
 
 ' - y F inrl F - ^ E, 2 
 
 < f i JLLi ailLl -L>?9 J-*l" 
 
 ioo ioo ;/! 
 
 1 T^ T T '^1 
 
 and rL S 2 = (oL 2 i } 
 
 n. 2 
 
 and o)L 2 = -^ / ] (- 
 100 li\#i 
 
 ioo 
 
188 TRANSFORMERS 
 
 Thus all the electrical constants of a given 
 transformer can be determined. 
 
 We may still further simplify the conception of the 
 equivalent coils by assuming a transforming ratio of i : i 
 and the winding of the current receiving device so altered 
 that the primary voltage may be applied. The trans- 
 former may then be omitted from Fig. 97, and there will 
 only remain the equivalent coils, as shown in Fig. 98, 
 the primary and secondary being now combined into 
 one inductance coil L and one resistance coil R. The 
 apparatus receiving current is represented by the 
 inductance coil A and the resistance coil p. 
 
 The values of L^ and R 7 , have not altered. The 
 new values for the two remaining equivalent coils 
 are 
 
 L=.32_Ei and R=R 1 + 
 100 i! 
 
 The self-induction of a transformer. The self-induc- 
 tion of any apparatus through which current is passing 
 may be defined as the reactance (>L), that is, the ratio 
 
 between the wattless component of the E.M.F. (-- -] 
 
 V 100 / 
 
 and the current. 
 
 To get the reactance we short-circuit the terminals 
 2, 2 and measure the current supplied to i, i, and by 
 wattmeter the wattless component of the E.M.F. supplied 
 to these terminals. In this case the current I through 
 2, 2 will be very nearly the same as that supplied to i, i, 
 so that we can also write 
 
 lOOl 
 
 for the reactance of the transformer proper. Since i^ 
 and i h are very small as compared with I at any but the 
 smallest loads, this expression will also hold good when 
 the transformer is under pressure. Only at very light loads 
 or on open circuit will the inductance L, and therefore 
 also the reactance o>L, be materially higher. In the latter 
 case we have I =o and l l = 7^ The electrical constants 
 
THE SELF-INDUCTION OF A TRANSFORMER 189 
 
 of one equivalent coil containing both resistance and 
 inductance will then be 
 
 Take as an example a 2O-kw. transformer for 2000 volt 
 at 50 frequency on the primary side. Let it have 2 per 
 cent, iron loss and 2 per cent, copper loss, and let the 
 inductive drop be 3 per cent, and the wattless component 
 of the no-load current 0*5 ampere. We have for this 
 transformer under a moderate load 
 
 T 3 2000 
 100 10 
 
 314 L = 6 and L = 0*0192 Henry 
 
 The resistance of the equivalent coil is found from the 
 2 per cent, copper heat at 10 ampere primary current 
 from 
 
 R . 10= - . 2000, or R = 4 ohm 
 100 
 
 400 , . 
 
 ** = - - = 0-2 and ^ = 
 
 2000 
 
 This gives 
 
 2000 
 
 - = roooo 
 0*2 
 
 T 2OOO IT/ T / O'Z \ 2 
 
 L = = 127 and L =ft>L u ( ) = 10*0 
 
 314.0-5 M vo'54/ 
 
 We thus find that on open circuit the transformer has 
 a self-induction of 10*9 Henry, whereas on a moderate 
 load the self-induction is only 0*0192 Henry. On open 
 circuit the self-induction is 570 times as great as on load. 
 
1 90 TRANSFORMERS 
 
 Working' condition represented by vector diagram. 
 We have already made use of vector diagrams to re- 
 present the relations between current, E.M.F., flux, exci- 
 tation and phase angles, assuming for sake of simplicity 
 that the transforming ratio is i : i. These vector dia- 
 grams can, however, be made more simple by introducing 
 the conception of equivalent coils, which conception be- 
 comes possible for a transformation ratio of unity. In 
 this case the consuming device receives from the second- 
 ary terminals the current which has passed through the 
 equivalent main coils L and R (Fig. 98) with its full 
 strength, but attenuated as regards pressure by the re- 
 action of these coils ; and to the primary terminals has 
 to be supplied, not only this current, but also the currents 
 taken by the equivalent coils L^ and R/,, which, being 
 placed as shunts, have no influence on the pressure. 
 They only influence the primary current. As far as 
 the working current in the load X, p, and the effect of R 
 and L are concerned, we may disregard the shunt coils 
 altogether, but we must take them into account if we wish 
 to determine the primary current. It should be noted 
 that at constant primary voltage the current taken by 
 the shunt coils and its phase are constant, whatever may 
 be the working condition of the transformer ; and herein 
 lies the advantage of this method of treatment. We can 
 determine the working condition of the main circuit 
 of the transformer by the use of a very simple vector 
 diagram, and when this is done, acid vectorially the 
 currents in the shunt coils. 
 
 Let, in Fig. 99, MD 2 be the vector of the E.M.F. 
 supplied to the load, and MI the current vector, then 
 D 2 D X = RI represents the loss of E.M.F. in R, and D X E = 
 >LI the E.M.F. required to overcome self-induction. 
 The E.M.F. to be impressed on the primary terminals 
 is therefore ME. If the load consists of a group of con- 
 suming devices coupled in parallel, all producing the 
 same lag, its angle p will not change if some of the con- 
 suming devices are switched on or off. The length 
 of the vector MI will change, but the phase angle p 
 will remain constant. The angle D^D 2 also remains 
 constant, although the sides of the triangle will vary 
 
WORKING BY VECTOR DIAGRAM 
 
 191 
 
 proportionately with the current. We can therefore 
 regard 
 
 as a measure of the current^ and by using a scale the 
 
 divisions of which are >L times as long as those of the 
 
 volt scale, we can scale off the current on the line D X E. 
 
 We suppose the impressed voltage ME to be constant. 
 
 This is the usual case in 
 
 practice. To find the second- 
 
 ary E.M.F. and its phase 
 
 relation to the working cur- 
 
 rent I. if the latter be changed 
 
 by changing the load, we 
 
 reason as follows : Since the 
 
 angle DjED^j and the angle 
 
 
L 
 
 and f is given by the character of the load. To find the 
 working condition for any current I at phase angle 
L and rotate 
 the two components by 90, so that ^ falls in line with ME 
 and i h comes into quadrature with it. We make 
 
 then DjOi is a measure of the primary current, and 
L of the equivalent coil must be large, and the 
 higher the frequency the better. Fig. 102 shows a 
 carcase specially designed to produce leakage. 
 
 The two coils are on two limbs of the carcase, and there 
 is a third limb without winding. Its object is simply to 
 form a magnetic by-pass to the useful flux, that is to say, 
 to increase leakage. Since the winding space is not re- 
 stricted as in an ordinary transformer, the ohmic resist- 
 ance of the coils can be made very small, so that the angle 
 a in the triangle D X ED 2 in Fig. 99 becomes very acute, 
 
CONSTANT CURRENT TRANSFORMER 19; 
 
 and D X E =a>LI becomes large in comparison with DiD 2 . 
 We may assume a to be nearly zero ; then the centre of 
 the inner circle will be distant from ME by 
 
 The points D 2 and D x will nearly coincide. DjE is a 
 measure of the secondary current, and MD 1 is very nearly 
 the secondary E.M.F. On short circuiting the load 
 MD 2 becomes zero, and MDj so small that we may con- 
 sider ME a measure for the secondary current. The 
 smaller the power factor of the load the flatter will be 
 the inner circle (see Fig. 102) and the greater the varia- 
 tion of current D X E for a given range of secondary 
 E.M.F. of, say, MD X as a maximum down to zero. 
 
 If there be self-induction in the external circuit the 
 arrangement will therefore be very imperfect or only 
 applicable over a very small range of secondary E.M.F., 
 the greatest attainable E.M.F. being many times smaller 
 than the primary E.M.F. The arrangement is therefore 
 useless for arc light circuits ; it can, however, ba used for 
 glow-lamp circuits. In this case  2 . The efficiency of the transformer is then 
 given by the expression 
 
 WDK' 
 
 If the supply voltage is high, it is advisable to so 
 connect the wattmeter that in the instrument itself no 
 great potential difference can arise. Otherwise there is 
 the risk of breaking down its insulation. Fig. 107 shows 
 the arrangement of connections which should on that 
 account be avoided. Theoretically Fig. 107 is equivalent 
 with Fig. 1 06 ; the latter arrangement is, however, from 
 a practical point of view, preferable, because the highest 
 potential difference which can arise between the fixed 
 and movable coil is only that due to the resistance and 
 
 inductance of the latter, and is 
 therefore only a small fraction of 
 the total pressure. On account 
 of safety in handling the instru- 
 ment, it is also advisable to earth, 
 if possible, that terminal of the 
 
 9 generator which is directly con- 
 nected with the terminal A of 
 
 the wattmeter. 
 
 The theory of the ordinary 
 dynamometer used as a watt- 
 meter given above is only correct if the assumption of 
 an inductionless shunt circuit is justified, by reason of 
 the inductionless resistance being very great as compared 
 with the reactance of the movable coil in series with it. 
 There will then be almost no lag of the current in this 
 coil. To reduce the lag absolutely to zero is, of course, 
 impossible, since the action of the instrument pre-supposes 
 the existence of a mechanical force, which can only be 
 obtained by means of a coil producing a magnetic field of 
 its own, that is to say, having a certain amount of induct- 
 ance which must produce some lag. If this inductance 
 is not negligible, a correction to the reading must be 
 made as shown in the following theory. 
 
 Let Oe in Fig. 108 represent the vector of the total 
 
 FIG. 107. Incorrect method 
 of connecting. 
 
MEASUREMENT OF POWER 
 
 200 
 
 supply pressure, and O/ that of the main current through 
 the fixed coil, which has a lag  
 In the former 
 case we have an instrument with negligible self-induction, 
 and in the latter case the self-induction in the shunt 
 happens to be of such a value as to produce the same 
 lag as in the main circuit. The case most frequently 
 occurring in practice is that there is some lag in the 
 main circuit, and that 
 i//. The correcting factor is 
 then slightly less than unity, and attains its minimum if 
 
,. Each 
 field produces eddy currents 
 lagging by 90, the strength of 
 which is proportional to the flux. 
 We thus get i m as the eddy due to  m or I and i s as 
 the eddy due to fa or E. The turning moment exerted 
 is therefore proportional to 
 
 COS tp(l m (f) s -J- t s  m ) 
 
 E 
 
 FIG. no. Vector diagram of 
 induction wattmeter. 
 
THE INDUCTION-WATTMETER 213 
 
 and since fluxes and eddies are proportional to I and E, 
 we have 
 
 Torque = cos  the 
 
 FIG i i2.-vector diagram of 
 wattmeter. 
 
MEASUREMENT OF POWER 215 
 
 phase angle  2 r z r^ 
 
 where k is a constant. We have therv 
 
 a = A (e^k - e. 6 k] + B(^ - e^k) 
 
 Now, e^ e^ is nothing else than the mesh voltage 
 between A and C, and e. 2 e z is similarly the mesh voltage 
 between B and C. Call the former E ac and the latter 
 E 6c . The formula for a may then be written thus 
 
 Now, we know from the investigation previously carried 
 out on Behn-Eschenburg's connection that the expression 
 in brackets is a measure for the total power P, so that 
 
 The deflection shown on the dial of Franke's duplex 
 wattmeter is a true measure of the total power trans- 
 mitted by an unsymmetrically loaded three phase line. 
 
 Three-voltmeter method. Profs. Ayrton and Perry 
 have devised a method of measuring the power transmitted 
 to a consuming device which can be applied in all cases 
 where the available pressure is sensibly greater than that 
 required by the consuming device, and the necessary 
 reduction in pressure can be made by the interposition 
 of an induct ionless resistance. In this method it is 
 
220 TRANSFORMERS 
 
 necessary to measure three voltages, hence the name. 
 We measure the total voltage and its two components. 
 The method will be understood from Fig. 115, where 
 ~ is the generator, a an amperemeter, W an induc- 
 tionless resistance, and T the transformer absorbing the 
 power which we wish to measure. A voltmeter is placed 
 between the main leads ; let its reading be e. Another 
 voltmeter is used to show the potential difference e., 
 between the terminals of the inductionless resistance, and 
 a third instrument shows the potential difference between 
 the terminals of the primary of the transformer. Instead 
 of using three separate voltmeters, we may of course use 
 the same instrument for taking all three readings by a 
 
 suitable switching arrange- 
 ment, as shown in Fig. 117. 
 This arrangement is pre- 
 ferable on account of its 
 greater simplicity, and be- 
 cause slight errors in the 
 
 FlG. I i 5 .-Ayrton and Perry three-volt- . 
 
 meter method of measuring power. Calibrations of the instru- 
 
 ment have less influence on 
 
 the result. The clock diagram of the method is shown 
 in Fig 116. OI is the current, OE^^ is the E.M.F. 
 impressed on the transformer, and EjE is the E.M.F. 
 absorbed in the resistance W. Since the latter is induc- 
 tionless, its vector EjE must be parallel to the current 
 vector OI. OE=e is the total E.M.F. The watt- 
 component of the impressed E.M.F. e l is e w = OA, and 
 the energy is OI x OA. Since W has no inductance, we 
 have AE 1 = BE= J , the E.M.F. of self-induction, due to 
 T, and the following equations obtain 
 
 from which we find 
 
 The power is given by the formula 
 
THREE-VOLTMETER METHOD 221 
 
 ^ 
 
 To find the power we must take four readings, namely, 
 three voltmeter readings and one amperemeter reading. 
 If the resistance W is accurately known, the last reading 
 may be omitted and the power calculated according to 
 the formula 
 
 2\V 
 
 This is the power actually supplied to the apparatus 
 T, in our case a transformer. If 
 we want to know the power 
 
 2 
 
 supplied by the generator _ :? > 
 
 the power lost in the resistance 
 must of course be added, and we 
 obtain 
 
 Instead of calculating P, we can 
 
 find the watt-component of e l 
 
 graphically by drawing circles 
 
 with radii e l and e, and shifting 
 
 a vertical line parallel to itself Fl0 ' "Sl^^* 8 *""* 
 
 until a position is found in which 
 
 the piece contained between the two circles is exactly 
 
 equal to c z . This gives the position of the point E l in 
 
 Fig. 1 1 6, and therefore also the length of the vector 
 
 OA = e w . The power is then 
 
 The diagram shows at a glance that a small error in the 
 volt-measurements will produce the larger an error in 
 the determination of the power the nearer the circle 
 of e l is to O or e, and that the error will be least if e 1 
 is midway between O and e. To obtain an accurate 
 measurement of power by this method we must, therefore, 
 so choose the resistance W that e 2 does not sensibly differ 
 from e lt that is to say, that about the same pressure is 
 lost in the resistance as is used in the apparatus under 
 test. The total voltage e must then be considerably 
 
222 
 
 TRANSFORMERS 
 
 greater (from ij to 2 times) than that required by the 
 apparatus under test. 
 
 Another difficulty is the necessity of using up in the 
 ballast resistance W approximately the same power as 
 in the consuming device itself. The method is therefore 
 specially applicable in cases where the power to be 
 measured is small such, for instance, as an open circuit 
 test of a transformer. The ballast resistance may con- 
 veniently be a lamp-board, and in order to use the same 
 voltmeter for all three readings the special switch shown 
 in Fig. 117 may be used. When testing small trans- 
 formers the power to be measured (being practically the 
 
 FIG. 117. Three-voltmeter method of measuring power. 
 
 equivalent of the iron losses) is so small that the power 
 required by a dynamometric voltmeter can in com- 
 parison not be considered as negligible. In such a case 
 the three-voltmeter method is specially useful. To 
 avoid the necessity of making a correction for the power 
 taken by the voltmeter, we may use an electrostatic 
 instrument. 
 
 A is an amperemeter, V a voltmeter having about 
 twice the range of the voltage necessary for the trans- 
 former, and S is the special switch. It is advisable to 
 make the supply voltage adjustable so that the test may 
 be made under the condition giving greatest accuracy, as 
 explained above. Where the supply voltage is no higher 
 
THREE-AMPEREMETER METHOD 223 
 
 than that required by the consuming device the three- 
 voltmeter method is not applicable, but then we may 
 use the 
 
 Three - amperemeter method devised by Professor 
 Fleming. Current at fixed pressure is supplied at the 
 terminals K, Fig. 118, and is taken through an ampere- 
 meter a, at the other side of which it is "divided into two 
 circuits, one containing the transformer T to be tested, 
 and the other an inductionless resistance W. These 
 two currents are measured on the amperemeters a x and 
 a. 2 ; the pressure is measured on the voltmeter e. The 
 clock diagram of this combination is shown in Fig. 119, 
 where OE represents the pressure of the supply current, i 
 the primary current of T, and i w its power component ; 
 i 2 is the current flowing through the resistance W ; and 
 
 r ,m 
 
 ^^ I\WVWWV 
 __r__/WVVWW\A 
 
 FT 
 
 i 
 
 '2 
 
 FIG. 118. Fleming's three-amperemeter FIG. 119. Vector diagram 
 
 method of measuring'power. to Fig. 118. 
 
 its vector must of course be parallel with OE. From 
 the diagram it will be seen that the following relation 
 obtains 
 
 The power is given by 
 
 If the resistance W is accurately known, the reading for 
 e need not be taken, and the power may be calculated 
 from 
 
 Also in this method accuracy depends upon the proper 
 choice of the resistance. It should be so adjusted that 
 / 2 is not sensibly different from /, ; the total current i will 
 
224 
 
 TRANSFORMERS 
 
 then be from i^ to 2 times the primary current zi taken 
 by the transformer. Fig. 1 20 shows an arrangement of 
 switches and connections whereby the same amperemeter 
 is used for all three readings. I is a single-lever and 
 1 1 a double-lever switch. 
 
 In considering both methods, we have tacitly assumed 
 that current and pressure follow a sine law ; the question 
 now arises, whether these methods will give accurate re- 
 sults if this condition is not fulfilled, that is to say, if the 
 curves representing E.M.F. and current are of irregular 
 shape. That the wattmeter gives correct indications 
 also in such cases has already been shown, and since 
 simultaneous measurements by means of a wattmeter 
 
 FIG. 1 20. Three-amperemeter method of measuring- power. 
 
 and one or the other methods here described are always 
 in accord, we naturally conclude that these methods 
 must also be generally applicable. Apart from such 
 experimental proof, this can also be shown by theory. 
 For this purpose we shall consider the three-voltmeter 
 method, the application to the analogous case of the 
 three-amperemeter method will then be self-evident. 
 Let in the following the letters e and i denote the 
 instantaneous values of E.M.F. and current respectively, 
 then the expression 
 
 is valid at any time in the cycle. We also have at al! 
 times 
 
THREE-AMPEREMETER METHOD 225 
 
 and the power at any moment is 
 
 f) = i^ l __f j or e 
 
 7 2 ,,2 i ^ ^, x, i ^2 
 
 The work done in the time T of a complete cycle \sf' r pdt, 
 and the effective power is 
 
 T 
 
 ~ 
 
 1 2 W o o o 
 
 It has been previously shown that the expression 
 = r r e^dt is simply the square of the effective pressure 
 
 
 
 indicated by the voltmeter ; if now we denote these 
 effective pressures by e, e lt e 2 respectively, we have 
 
 Since in arriving at this result (which is exactly the same 
 as that reached by the graphic method), we have made 
 no assumption whatever as regards the shape of the 
 E.M.F. curve, it follows that the three-voltmeter method 
 is applicable to currents of any form. 
 
CHAPTER XI 
 
 TES TING TRA NS FORMER STES TING SHEE T- 
 IRON SPECIAL IMPLEMENTS BY DOLIVO 
 DOBROWOLSKY, KAPP, EPSTEIN, RICHTER, 
 E WING THE BALLIS TIC METHOD THE 
 FL UXOMETER SCOTT S METHOD KAPPS 
 METHOD 
 
 Testing transformers. -- By means of the various 
 methods above explained the output and efficiency of 
 transformers can be determined. It is of course neces- 
 sary to have a source of current capable of supplying all 
 the power wanted, and a load capable to absorb the full 
 output of the transformer. To obtain by this direct 
 method anything like a reliable figure for the efficiency, 
 input and output must be measured with extreme accuracy, 
 the reason being, that the two are not very different, and 
 a small error in the determination of one or the other 
 causes a great error in their calculated ratio. Let for 
 instance the real input be 100 and the real output 97 
 kw., and let there be an error of i per cent, in each 
 measurement, the error being negative in the measure- 
 ment of the input and positive in the measurement of the 
 output. The measurements would then be 99 and 98 
 kw. respectively, and the calculated efficiency would be 
 99 per cent, instead of 97 per cent., which it really is. 
 To reduce as much as possible the magnitude of the 
 error in the determination of the efficiency, it is advisable 
 to make this determination by an indirect method in the 
 following way. The test is made simultaneously on two 
 equal transformers, which are so connected that the out- 
 put of No. i forms the input of No. 2, and the output of 
 this, supplemented by an external source of power, the 
 input of No. i. We obtain thus a circulation of power 
 through the two transformers, and need only supply as 
 
 226 
 
TESTING TRANSFORMERS 
 
 227 
 
 much power as is wasted in both. This is a small 
 amount, and need only be measured with a moderate 
 degree of accuracy. The power circulating is also 
 measured, and it will be obvious that small or moderate 
 errors in both measurements cannot seriously affect the 
 accuracy of the result. The arrangement of apparatus 
 is shown in Fig. 121. D and B are the two equal trans- 
 formers, and C is a small auxiliary transformer which 
 supplies the waste power and thus keeps the total power 
 in circulation. Into the primary of C we insert an in- 
 ductionless rheostat R, for the purpose of adjusting the 
 pressure supplied to C, so as to obtain in the ampere- 
 
 WWWW\A/W 
 
 FIG. 121. Testing transformers. 
 
 meter A the normal full load current of the big trans- 
 formers. The connections between the latter must, 
 of course, be so arranged that their E.M.Fs. oppose 
 each other. If the large transformers were only con- 
 nected to C, the full current could be obtained in 
 them, but not the pressure. To ensure that also the 
 right pressure is maintained in B and D, we connect 
 their primaries, shown in Fig. 121 as thick wire coils, 
 with the generator. The connections are taken through 
 the wattmeter W\ and through the electrical centre of the 
 auxiliary transformer. The object of the latter arrange- 
 ment is to ensure that the voltage on the primary of one 
 transformer shall be raised by the same amount as that 
 of the other is depressed, so that the induction in both 
 
228 TRANSFORMERS 
 
 shall be as nearly alike the normal value as possible. If 
 the centre of the auxiliary transformer is not accessible, 
 the connection may be made on one of its terminals, and 
 then there will be some inequality in the working condi- 
 tion of the two transformers, but the error thereby intro- 
 duced is not very serious, since the difference in primary 
 voltage is comparatively small. The wattmeter W 1 is 
 introduced to measure iron losses. The copper losses 
 are measured on the wattmeter W 2 . If we short-circuit 
 the rheostat of C, then the generator has to supply only 
 the no-load losses of B and D, which will be indicated 
 on the wattmeter W lt Since both transformers are equal, 
 no current will be indicated in A. Now let us insert C 
 and adjust the rheostat until A indicates the full-load 
 current. Then the large transformers are both working 
 under full load, and the wattmeters W 1 and W 2 measure 
 all losses. 
 
 The voltage on each primary is measured by the volt- 
 meter V, which is provided with a change-over switch s. 
 Let e be the average of these two readings and i the 
 current indicated on A, then the combined power of both 
 transformers is iei and the total loss is the sum of the 
 two wattmeter readings 
 
 W = Wj + W 2 
 The efficiency of each transformer is therefore 
 
 ei 
 
 W 
 
 - 
 2 
 
 To get the true copper losses switch S should be 
 opened. If it remains closed whilst the contact on the 
 rheostat R is put down to the lowest contact so as to 
 short-circuit C, there will still be a small current (namely 
 the magnetising current of transformer D) flowing through 
 the wattmeter W 2 . If now the contact is raised so as to 
 produce a main current, this small current will, according 
 to the connection, either increase or diminish the current 
 flowing through the wattmeter, and to this extent W 2 will 
 indicate either a little more or a little less than the true 
 
TESTING TRANSFORMERS 229 
 
 copper loss. The error may be avoided by repeating 
 the test with W 2 inserted in the primary of B and taking 
 the mean of the two readings. In practical work for 
 measuring efficiency this correction need, however, not 
 be made, since the error is very small ; whilst for measur- 
 ing copper losses only, the simple expedient of opening 
 switch S is sufficient to avoid the error. 
 
 The test illustrated in Fig. 121 can also be used to 
 determine the drop by opening S and moving the contact 
 of R to such a position that a predetermined (preferably 
 the normal working) current flows through the primaries. 
 The voltage must then be read on a second voltmeter 
 (not shown in the diagram), which is connected to the 
 primary terminals. Let e Q be this voltage, i the current, 
 and w the reading on W 2 , then the equivalent resistance 
 r of one transformer is 
 
 Its ohmic drop is 
 
 and its inductive drop is 
 
 
 (O 
 
 U= /5L- 
 
 )U^)being the reactance of the equivalent coil. 
 
 The advantage of this method of testing is not only 
 great accuracy, but also economy of power. The latter 
 point is of importance when testing for temperature rise, 
 since the final temperature is only reached after many 
 hours, and in the case of large transformers some days 
 of working at full power. The cost of power and the 
 difficulty of using it up in an artificial load become thus 
 serious obstacles, so that a test which only requires the 
 supply of the power wasted, as that shown in Fig. 121, 
 is also commercially advantageous. 
 
 It is, however, not always possible to test two equal 
 transformers together for temperature rise. In this case 
 the transformer may be preliminarily heated in a drying 
 room (most electrical engineering works are provided 
 
230 TRANSFORMERS 
 
 with such a room), and then put to work under normal 
 load, whilst thermometric or resistance readings are taken 
 from time to time to find out when the final temperature 
 rise has been reached. Or the transformer may be 
 worked alternately on open circuit to heat the iron, and 
 have continuous currents passed through both coils to 
 heat the copper. This preliminary period of heating 
 may be shortened by working at increased voltage and 
 current density. When the probable final temperature 
 has been reached the transformer is put to work normally, 
 and kept at work until the final temperature has been 
 actually reached. 
 
 Another method is to heat the iron by alternating 
 current sent through one winding, and the other winding 
 at the same time by continuous current. This winding 
 must, of course, be opened in the middle, and the two 
 halves must be coupled up in opposition so that no alter- 
 nating E.M.F. is produced at the two free ends. By 
 keeping a record of the continuous current and E.M.F. 
 supplied to this winding the rise of its ohmic resistance, 
 and therefore the rise of its temperature, may be graphic- 
 ally represented as a function of the time. From this 
 curve the time constant for heating may be found, and 
 from that the final temperature rise and the time in which 
 it would be reached may be computed. 
 
 The insulation of a transformer should be tested when 
 hot. It is also advisable to flash the transformer, so that 
 any weak spot in the insulation may be found out and 
 remedied before the apparatus is set to work. For this 
 purpose, temporary connection should be made between 
 (a) a primary and secondary terminal ; (b) a primary 
 terminal and carcase ; (c) a secondary terminal and car- 
 case. Care must of course be taken that during these 
 tests both poles of the generator are well insulated from 
 earth, or the carcase must be insulated from earth. 
 
 Testing sheet-iron. An obvious way of testing any 
 particular batch of plates intended to be used in the 
 manufacture of transformers, is to select at random some 
 of the plates sufficient for the carcase of a small trans- 
 former (preferably a stock size), wind it in the usual way 
 and test for iron losses. If the test of this sample is 
 
SPECIAL IMPLEMENTS 
 
 231 
 
 satisfactory the whole batch can' be passed as suitable. 
 The drawback to this method is that the building up of a 
 complete transformer takes too much time. What is 
 required is a method of testing samples which does not 
 involve the winding of coils, and where the test pieces 
 are of a simple form, so that but little time is required in 
 the preparation of samples and not too much material is 
 wasted. 
 
 Special implements. One of the oldest instruments 
 is the iron tester of Dolivo Dobrowolsky, shown in Fig. 
 122. It has now only historic interest. 1 It consists of 
 
 two | | shaped cores of sheet-iron, which can be laid 
 
 together either directly or placed on 
 either side of the sample AA to be 
 tested. The sample is composed of 
 rectangular sheets and forms the 
 common yoke to the electro-magnets 
 n, s. When the magnets are placed 
 directly in contact, the direction of 
 the current through the coils is such 
 that both drive the induction in the 
 same sense ; when the sample is 
 inserted, the connections are charged 
 by means of the switch B, in such 
 manner as to produce the polarity 
 indicated in the diagram. The flux 
 now passes from both 
 through the yoke. The current 
 
 magnets 
 
 is 
 
 FlG. 122. Dobrowolsky 
 iron tester. 
 
 measured by a dynamometer marked EL Dyn. in the 
 figure, and the pressure by a Cardew voltmeter marked 
 Card. The power is measured by a wattmeter inserted 
 as shown. In using ,the apparatus the magnets are 
 laid together and the switch is put into the position 
 which produces circular magnetisation. The power corre- 
 sponding to various values of the induction is then 
 measured, the induction being calculated from the fre- 
 quency, the pressure and the known data of the coils and 
 magnet cores. The sample is then inserted, the switch 
 changed over and the measurements repeated. The 
 
 1 First published in 1892 in the Elektrotechnische Zeitschrift, from 
 which Fig. 122 is copied. 
 
232 
 
 TRANSFORMERS 
 
 sectional area of the sample should be about double that 
 of the magnets. The difference between the two sets of 
 measurements is then the power wasted in the sample at 
 the various values of the induction. A drawback of this 
 method is the difference in magnetic leakage with and 
 without the sample. If the magnets are laid together 
 directly, and magnetised circularly, there is hardly any 
 leakage, and B can be calculated from E with great 
 accuracy. If the sample is inserted, the magnetic resist- 
 ance is increased, and leakage produced which diminishes 
 the value of B in the sample. At the same time there is 
 a difference in the value of the induction along the 
 magnet cores, the induction being a maximum in the 
 centre of each core. E can therefore no longer be 
 
 regarded as an exact 
 measure for B, and an 
 error is thus introduced. 
 ^ To avoid this diffi- 
 
 | culty, the author has con- 
 structed the apparatus 
 shown in Fig. 123. The 
 i sample consists in this 
 apparatus also of a batch 
 of rectangular plates, and 
 forms one of the two 
 longer sides of a rectangular frame, the three other 
 
 sides being formed by \ \ shaped plates of known 
 
 magnetic quality. Both longer sides are surrounded 
 by coils, the upper one being large enough to admit 
 the insertion of the sample without difficulty. The 
 connection is made for circular magnetisation, so that 
 only very little leakage takes place, and this is the 
 same for all samples. The sample must have approxi- 
 mately the same cross-section as the magnet. To 
 calibrate the instrument, a sample is prepared from 
 the same iron as the magnet, and after weighing the 
 total amount of iron in the magnet, the loss of power is 
 determined for different values of B. This loss is then 
 allotted between magnet and sample according to their 
 relative weights, and a curve is plotted showing the loss 
 in the magnet as a function of B. If now another sample 
 
 FIG. 123. Kapp iron tester. 
 
SPECIAL IMPLEMENTS 
 
 233 
 
 A slight error in the measure- 
 
 is inserted, and the total loss measured, we have only 
 to deduct from it the loss as found from the curve for 
 the particular induction observed, and the rest is the loss 
 in the sample. 
 
 The objection to this method of measuring the loss 
 in the sample is that the loss is obtained as the difference 
 between two measurements, both of which are larger 
 than the result desired, 
 ment of the total loss 
 may therefore mean 
 a large error in the 
 result. This draw- 
 back has been over- 
 come in the apparatus 
 shown in Fig. 124, 
 which has been de- 
 signed by the " Hys- 
 teresis Committee" of 
 the German Associa- 
 tion of Electrical 
 Engineers, and offici- 
 ally accepted by this 
 Association in 1902, 
 after having been on 
 trial in various works 
 for some years. The 
 instrument is also 
 known as the " Ep- 
 stein Iron Tester," 
 Prof. Epstein having 
 been chairman of the 
 Committee. In this 
 
 method of testing no foreign iron is used, the whole of 
 the magnetic circuit being made up of sample plates in 
 the form of a square. Each side of the square is a bar 
 made up of strips with tissue-paper insertion. The bars 
 are 50 cm. long, and have a cross-section of 30 mm. by 
 about 25 mm. Each bar contains 2*5 kg. of plates, so 
 that for testing each batch a little over 10 kg. of plates 
 (allowing for waste) have to be cut up. Each side of 
 the square is surrounded by a magnetising coil, the four 
 
 FIG. 124. Epstein iron tester. 
 
234 
 
 TRANSFORMERS 
 
 coils being fixtures of the apparatus and wide enough to 
 admit the samples. The samples abut at the corners, 
 where they are pressed together by screws, a thin sheet 
 of fibre being placed in the butt-joint to avoid loss of 
 power by eddies. Fig. 125 shows a diagram of con- 
 nections. The terminals k, k of the apparatus are con- 
 nected to the supply terminals K, K, from which the 
 magnetising current is taken. To find the "figure of 
 loss " the frequency to be used is 50 and the induction 
 10,000, which corresponds to about 85 volt. Each coil 
 has 1 50 turns, and the total resistance of the four coils 
 is 0*18 ohm. Since the magnetising current is only a 
 few ampere, the correction for copper loss is very small 
 in comparison with the figure of loss, which for alloyed 
 
 FIG. 125. Epstein iron tester. 
 
 iron is of the order of magnitude of 2 watt per kg. or 
 20 watt for the whole sample. It is advisable to use 
 a frequency indicator (not shown in the diagram) when 
 an accurate test is required. The magnetising current 
 is adjusted by the rheostat, and the power is measured 
 on the wattmeter W. The net area of the bars A is 
 calculated from the weight and density (about 777), and 
 their total length (2 m.) and the induction from the 
 formula 
 
 e being the E.M.F. induced in the four coils. This is 
 very nearly also the E.M.F. indicated on the voltmeter 
 V, but for very accurate work e may be found by correct- 
 ing the voltmeter reading for copper loss, the correction 
 
SPECIAL IMPLEMENTS 235 
 
 being of course made vectorially. It is important to 
 open the voltmeter switch s when reading the wattmeter, 
 since the power taken by the voltmeter would otherwise 
 be counted as part of the iron loss. When measuring 
 the current it is advisable to open the switch s of the 
 pressure coil of the wattmeter so that only the true 
 magnetising current may pass through A. The machine 
 used as a source of E.M.F. should give as nearly as 
 possible a sine wave of E.M.F. The curve shown in 
 Fig. 1 1 gives total loss with alloyed plates of English 
 manufacture obtained by the author 'with this implement. 
 The power measured on W represents the combined 
 hysteretic and eddy current loss occurring in the sample, 
 and as the weight of the sample is known the loss per 
 unit weight can easily be found. We thus get the 
 quantity, which is of immediate interest to the designer, 
 but it is also possible to get hysteretic and eddy current 
 losses separately. From equations (8) and (So) it will be 
 seen that the total loss for any given sample of iron is 
 given by an expression of the form 
 
 P = /*vB*+/(vB) 2 (38) 
 
 where h and /"are constants depending on the quantity 
 and quality of iron under test and the thickness of the 
 plates. The exponent of B is usually taken as 1*6, but 
 to keep the investigation general we call it x. B is 
 found from the determination of e, as above explained, 
 and v is read on the frequency meter. We have thus 
 three unknown quantities, namely, h, f and x, and by 
 making three tests under different conditions we can 
 obtain three equations from which the three unknown 
 quantities are determined. The operation can be a little 
 simplified if we make all the tests for the same induction, 
 for which the condition is 
 
 e 
 
 - = constant 
 
 v 
 
 We need only vary the speed of the generator and 
 1 i i 
 
 keep its excitation as nearly constant as is required by 
 
 this condition. These two tests suffice. In these B 
 and therefore B^ and B 2 will remain constant, and the 
 
236 TRANSFORMERS 
 
 equation for the lost power in the cases where the 
 frequency is v l and v 2 may be written in the simple 
 form 
 
 from which H and F may easily be found. We have 
 then for the fixed induction B 
 
 Hysteretic loss at frequency v x . . . . 
 
 v 2 . . . . 
 Eddy current loss at frequency v . 
 
 To get complete curves of losses the tests have to be 
 repeated with different values of B. To any two values 
 of B, say B and B', and the same frequency v correspond 
 two hysteretic losses, P^ and P/, so that 
 
 P AB 
 
 
 from which x may be found by taking logarithms 
 
 _ 
 
 Having x, we find h from 
 
 and the coefficient^ may be found from 
 
 / -Bl 
 
 The Epstein iron tester may thus be used not only 
 to find the total loss for any values of B and v, but also 
 to separate hysteretic and eddy current losses and deter- 
 mine the coefficients in their formulae. 
 
 Mr. Richter has devised an implement for the testing 
 
SPECIAL IMPLEMENTS 
 
 237 
 
 of complete sheets as they are produced by the rolling- 
 mill. His object is to avoid the labour and waste of 
 material when cutting up sheets into sample strips. The 
 magnetising coils are long' and narrow rectangles, held 
 in a wooden frame with their long sides parallel to each 
 other and arranged circularly around the axis of the 
 frame. The coils are placed evenly round the axis, with 
 sufficient space between to allow the sheets to be slid 
 through their openings so as to form a closed cylinder, 
 
 FIG. 126. E wing's iron tester. 
 
 which is circularly magnetised. From the weight and 
 dimensions of the sheets the cross-sectional area of the 
 magnetic circuit can be calculated, the test being made 
 by voltmeter and amperemeter, as in the Epstein 
 apparatus. 
 
 An implement in which samples of only a few ounces' 
 weight can be tested has been devised by Prof. Ewing. 
 Its principle is the purely mechanical determination of 
 the hysteretic loss alone in a sample of very small 
 dimensions, namely 6 to 8 strips of 3 in. length and 
 
238 TRANSFORMERS 
 
 -| in. width. The apparatus consists of a permanent 
 magnet e, Fig. 126, which is suspended on knife-edges, f t 
 and weighted by a screw, g. For transport the magnet 
 can be raised off the knife-edges by means of a rack and 
 wheel, h. A dashpot below the magnet serves to steady 
 its swing, and a pointer moving over a scale at the top 
 shows the deflection produced when the sample a is 
 rotated between the poles. The sample is fastened by 
 screw-clamps b, b to a carrier, which can be rotated by 
 means of a handle, and the friction wheels d, c. The 
 screw i serves to level the instrument. The reversal of 
 magnetism in the sample is produced by the rotation 
 of the sample, and the work lost in hysteresis and eddy 
 currents per revolution is 2 TT x torque. The torque is 
 indicated on the scale by the pointer, and since 2?r is a 
 constant, we find that the deflection of the pointer gives 
 directly a measure for the loss per cycle, the speed of 
 rotation having no influence as long as it is not so high 
 as to sensibly augment eddy current losses. 
 
 The sample sheets are prepared to a gauge, the 
 length being sensibly less than the polar gap of the 
 magnet, so that the magnetic resistance of the air gap 
 preponderates over that of the sample itself. The object 
 of this arrangement is to avoid the error which might 
 otherwise be introduced when samples of widely different 
 permeability are tested. The magnet produces in the 
 sample an induction of about 4000 C.G.S. units, but this 
 can be slightly raised or lowered by taking less or more 
 sample plates. Prof. Ewing found that an accurate 
 adjustment as regards the weight of samples is not 
 required, since the deflection varies but slightly if the 
 number of plates making up a sample batch is varied. It 
 suffices to adjust the weight of the batch roughly to that 
 which corresponds to seven strips of 0*37 mm. thickness. 
 When testing armature plates, which are usually stouter, 
 a correspondingly smaller number of strips would be used 
 to make up the sample batch. 
 
 The apparatus is calibrated by using samples, the 
 hysteresis of which has previously been accurately 
 determined by the ballistic method. Two such standard 
 samples are supplied with the apparatus, together with 
 
THE BALLISTIC METHOD 239 
 
 tables giving the results of ballistic tests. In testing 
 other samples, a reading is also taken with one of the 
 standards, and the ratio of the readings is taken as the 
 ratio of hysteretic losses between standard and sample. 
 By this method of testing, the accuracy of the instrument 
 is rendered independent of any possible change that 
 may have occurred in the strength of the permanent 
 magnet. 
 
 The ballistic method. The methods of testing iron 
 above described suffice for the immediate requirements 
 of the designer, but special circumstances may arise 
 when it is desirable to know not only the power lost in 
 hysteresis and eddies, but also the shape of the hysteretic 
 loop. This cannot be found by any of the methods 
 hitherto described, and to get a complete knowledge of 
 the magnetic qualities of any brand of iron, some method 
 must be used which gives the relation between exciting 
 force and induction throughout a complete magnetic cycle. 
 Such an investigation is also necessary for the calibration 
 of certain workshop implements, such as the Ewing iron 
 tester. 
 
 To find the B-H curve we may use a ballistic 
 galvanometer, and make use~of the well-known physical 
 law that the deflection of the moving system of such 
 an instrument is proportional to the total quantity of 
 electricity which has been suddenly discharged through 
 it. The moving system may be a little magnet or a coil 
 as first used by Deprey D' Arson val. In the first case 
 the system is only slightly, in the second more effectively, 
 damped ; a certain amount of damping is unavoidable, 
 and, indeed, necessary for rapid working. 
 
 The elongation of the spot of light of a damped 
 galvanometer is given by the well-known formula 
 
 where /, a and b are constants, and V Q is the initial 
 velocity with which the spot of light leaves its position 
 of rest. Counting the time / from x = o, then the interval 
 of time between two successive passages through zero 
 positions in the same direction is given by the condition 
 
240 TRANSFORMERS 
 
 that the sine must be zero for both. We find thus the 
 periodic time 
 
 T _ 27r 
 
 : b 
 
 According to the theory of damped vacillations we have 
 
 where c is the controlling force, m the mass, and 8 a 
 coefficient which, multiplied by the velocity, gives the 
 damping force, all values being referred to the spot of 
 light. In a perfectly undamped galvanometer 8 = o and 
 
 b = 'Y , so that its periodic time is 
 
 Im 
 
 = 27TA/ 
 1 
 
 the well-known pendulum equation. It is obvious that 
 T>T , that is to say, that damping lengthens the periodic 
 time. As a further result it will be seen that damping 
 reduces the first and all subsequent elongations. 
 
 Before entering into the question how the effect of 
 damping can be allowed, for let us assume that it were 
 possible to make a perfectly undamped instrument, and 
 consider how such an instrument could be used for testing 
 iron. The correction for damping can then be considered 
 later. 
 
 The first (and indeed every subsequent) elongation 
 X Q is then proportional to the initial velocity z/ , and this 
 again is proportional to the quantity discharged through 
 the galvanometer from a coil through which the flux < 
 is reversed or annulled. The first elongation is thus a 
 measure for the flux passing through the sample which 
 is surrounded by the coil. If the area of cross-section A 
 be known, and the magnetising force H be measured, we 
 
 can obtain the relation between B = ^ and H. Instead 
 
 A 
 
 of annulling or reversing the flux we can also change it 
 
 t> O O 
 
 suddenly, but by small increments (by changing H), and 
 thus get step by step the relation between B and H, that 
 is, the hysteresis loop. It is, of course, necessary to 
 
THE BALLISTIC METHOD 24! 
 
 determine once for all the ratio between B and .% or in 
 other words to calibrate the galvanometer, and this 
 may be done in a variety of ways, which we shall now 
 consider. 
 
 Take a straight solenoid whose length / is at least 
 twenty diameters, and which has n^ turns, and place into 
 the centre a small co-axial pilot coil of area A and n turns, 
 then by sending l l ampere continuous current through 
 the solenoid there will be created within the pilot coil a 
 flux < = AH, where 
 
 H 
 
 The same holds good for a ring-shaped coil when / 
 is the mean circumference. The turns of the pilot coils 
 may be distributed all round the ring or placed in one 
 part only, but they should be below those of the magnet- 
 ising coil. The total flux AH which passes through the 
 n turns of the pilot coil is therefore known. If then we 
 observe the elongation, if the magnetising current is inter- 
 rupted (or reversed, which gives it twice as great), we can 
 determine the ratio between elongation and linkage flux. 
 As will be shown below, this ratio is constant for a given 
 resistance r in the galvanometer circuit, and we thus get 
 the equation 
 
 where b is the " ballistic constant." If we include in this 
 circuit not only the pilot coil of the standard solenoid, 
 but also that of the sample to be tested, the ballistic 
 constant need not be determined. All we need do is to 
 determine alternately the deflection obtained with the 
 two pilot coils and calculate from this the linkage flux of 
 the sample. This method of comparative observation 
 can be conveniently carried out by using the arrange- 
 ment shown in Fig 1 27. 
 
 S is the standard, A x an amperemeter to measure its 
 magnetising current l ly \J 1 a reversing switch, Rj a 
 rheostat, and B a battery. The sample is prepared in 
 form of a ring wound with two coils, one the magnetising 
 
 16 
 
2 4 2 
 
 TRANSFORMERS 
 
 coil receiving current from the same battery through a 
 rheostat R 2 and reversing switch U 2 , and the other a 
 pilot coil in series with the galvanometer G, and the 
 pilot coil of the standard S. A resistance, r, is inserted 
 to reduce the deflection of the galvanometer to a con- 
 venient amount, and s is a damping key by which after 
 
 vWvWWv I /vWA/WV 
 
 FIG. 127. Ballistic test. 
 
 each reading the moving coil can be quickly brought to 
 rest. 
 
 The E.M.F. produced by a change of flux in the 
 
 standard is -^- 5f microvolt, and the corresponding 
 100 dt 
 
 current is . ^>JL *X . microampere. The quantity 
 
 r 100 dt 
 
 discharged through the galvanometer is, on reversal 
 of Ij 
 
 Q = fidt = . 2< P n = fa microcoulomb 
 o loor 
 
 The ballistic constant for microcoulomb is therefore 
 
 , I 2(t>n 
 = 
 
 XQ ioor 
 
 We may thus calibrate the galvanometer for micro- 
 coulomb or any other convenient unit of quantity. But 
 
THE BALLISTIC METHOD 243 
 
 this calibration is not necessary if we wish to use a 
 merely -comparative method, as may be seen from the 
 following. Let the various quantities in the sample be 
 denoted by the same letters as in the standard, but 
 distinguished by a dash, thus 
 
 loor 
 <' = ^ 
 
 If the flux linkages n$ and n f  are not very widely 
 different, so that the deflections are of the same order of 
 magnitude, this method of testing is convenient, as the 
 constant of the instrument need not be known ; but if the 
 flux linkage of the sample is either very much greater 
 or very much smaller than that of the standard, it 
 becomes necessary to adjust r so as to get convenient 
 deflections, and then the simple proportionality between 
 quantity and deflection is lost. It is no longer admissible 
 to use a comparative method, and it becomes necessary 
 to determine the ballistic constant. One way of doing 
 this has already been shown. We found from a test on 
 the standard for microcoulomb 
 
 (39) 
 
 ioor 
 
 Another and very obvious method is to determine b by 
 discharging a condenser through the galvanometer and 
 observing the deflection. The arrangement is shown in 
 Fig. 125, where C is a standard condenser, Cl a Clark, 
 or other standard cell (*= 1*4323 5 volt at 15 C. for 
 the Clark, or 1-0196 volt at 15 C. for the cadmium cell) 
 and S a two-way key. The quantity discharged is then 
 with a condenser of C microfarad Ce microcoulomb, and 
 if a deflection of x scale dimensions is produced by this 
 discharge we have 
 
 b = (40) 
 
244 TRANSFORMERS 
 
 A third method of finding b is as follows. Let k be 
 the constant of the galvanometer for steady currents, so 
 that 
 
 i = yx microampere 
 
 The deflecting force is proportional to the current and 
 also proportional to the deflection or 
 
 ex = at and a = 
 
 r 
 
 The acceleration on starting is produced by the force at, 
 and we have therefore 
 
 dv 
 
 y 00 - 
 
 / aidt = mv 
 
 
 
 a Q = mv or abx = mv 
 From v' 2 = C -3? we find v=x*\ , and this inserted 
 
 171 
 
 gives 
 
 , , c , , b ./m 
 ab = Jem or - b = Jem or - = V 
 
 7 7 c 
 
 but for a completely undamped instrument the periodic 
 
 i m 
 time is 2irV = T, so that we can also write 
 
 27T X 27T 
 
 By sending a known fraction of a known current through 
 the galvanometer and observing the steady deflections 
 we determine 7, and by taking the current off and timing 
 the oscillations we determine T. From these two ob- 
 servations b can be found. 
 
 It should be noted that b depends on the damping 
 force, which may be considered constant, but not on the 
 resistance r, which may have to be raised between wide 
 
THE BALLISTIC METHOD 245 
 
 limits so as to get convenient deflections at all values of 
 n(f>. We thus have the general formula to express a 
 sudden change in flux through the sample 
 
 lOOo: 
 
 
 n 
 
 In this formula x is the deflection which would have 
 been observed if the galvanometer had been absolutely 
 undamped. In reality the deflection is (because of damp- 
 ing) a little smaller, say x& We have from the theory 
 of harmonic motions for an undamped oscillation 
 
 and for a damped oscillation 
 
 7t ~ an 
 
 *>*>'&* 
 
 
 
 since the time t of a quarter period is . The ratio be- 
 
 n IT 
 
 T 
 20 
 
 air n IT 
 
 tween the two deflections is e~ . Write 8 instead of T , 
 
 then 
 
 XQ = xe~ ft or x = xtfP 
 
 Let x be the next elongation in the same direction, x 2 
 the second next, and so on, then subsequent swings take 
 place in intervals of 
 
 T 
 
 = 
 
 27r 
 
 and the exponent of e in the equation for the deflections 
 
 x& x lt x. 2 . . . x n becomes 
 
 for x ....... y8 
 
 .;> ....... -j8-4)8 
 
 ....... -p-sp 
 
246 TRANSFORMERS 
 
 From this follows 
 
 = .... (42 ) 
 
 4^ * 
 
 Since ft is a very small number we can in the series 
 
 neglect the third and subsequent members and write 
 
 * = *-o(i+) (43) 
 
 x$ is the first elongation actually observed with a 
 moderately damped galvanometer, x is that elongation 
 which would have been observed if the galvanometer had 
 been absolutely undamped. It is this value x and not X Q 
 which has to be used in the determination of the ballistic 
 constant and the calculation of the change of flux from 
 
 b i vorx 
 
 n 
 
 The number /3 is called the logarithmic decrement ; a 
 convenient value of it is 2 or 3 per cent. 
 
 The fluxometer. The use of a ballistic galvanometer 
 presupposes the ability to change the flux very suddenly, 
 for the whole discharge from the pilot coil must be 
 completed before the moving system has appreciably 
 changed its position of rest. The condition of a very 
 abrupt change of flux is not difficult to fulfil if dealing 
 with a sample of moderate size, but if we attempt to take 
 the hysteresis loop of the carcase of a large transformer in 
 this way we find that unless an enormous resistance is 
 put into the magnetising circuit the change of flux does 
 not take place rapidly enough for the galvanometer, and 
 it is preferable to use a method of investigation which is 
 independent of the time rate at which the flux changes. 
 Such methods have been devised by Mr. C. F. Scott, the 
 Author and Mr. Grassot, the latter using a special 
 instrument, termed by him a fliixometer. I take this 
 first, as being more akin to the ballistic galvanometer. 
 
THE FLUXOMETER 
 
 24; 
 
 A delicately pivoted coil not subjected to any con- 
 trolling force swings in the strong field of a permanent 
 magnet, Fig. 128, the arrangement being similar to that 
 used in D'Arsonval instruments, but without a controlling 
 spring. The terminals, T, of this coil are connected to 
 the coil encircling the flux which is to be measured, say 
 the low-tension coil (or part of the low-tension coil) of a 
 transformer. The fluxometer coil is provided with a 
 pointer on one side and a mirror on the other, so that its 
 angular displacement may be observed either directly or 
 by a beam of light. The coil is set mechanically into its 
 zero position when its plane is parallel to the polar axis 
 
 FIG. 128. Principle of fluxometer. 
 
 of the permanent magnet and no flux threads it. If a 
 current is sent through it a torque is exerted and the 
 coil takes an angular position, the flux now threading it 
 being proportional to the angle of deflection. 
 
 The principle underlying the action of the instrument 
 is the physical law that any electric circuit has a tendency 
 to maintain its total linkage flux. If this quantity is 
 forcibly diminished in one part of the circuit another part 
 will try to restore it. Thus, if a pilot coil has been placed 
 over the middle of a bar magnet and is then stripped off 
 the linkage flux through the pilot coil is reduced to zero. 
 The fluxometer coil will then set itself at such an angle 
 as to thread the same linkage flux as that which has 
 vanished in the external part of the circuit. 
 
 Let M be the mass of the moving system, 
 
 c\ be the force exerted by the current through 
 the fluxometer coil, 
 
2 4 8 TRANSFORMERS 
 
 Let Dz> be the damping force at speed v, 
 
 sv be the E.M.F. in the fluxometer coil generated 
 when moving at the speed v through the field 
 of the permanent magnet ; 
 
 the quantities M, c, D, and v referring to a point on the 
 indicating needle i cm. distant from the axis of rotation. 
 Let, further, L be the inductance and r the resistance 
 of the fluxometer coil, then an E.M.F. E applied to its 
 terminals will produce a current I and a displacement. 
 We have 
 
 at 
 
 T? T a ^ 
 
 E - ev - L 
 di 
 
 dt 
 
 *''- w- L 
 
 dt dt 
 
 dv ^E csv ^L dfl 
 di~~ r r r dt 
 
 r \r ) r 
 
 Integrating this equation and remembering that both 
 I and r are zero at the beginning and at the end of the 
 process, we get 
 
 r /"x* //~ \ x* 00 
 
 - - / E* - (- + D )/ vdt 
 
 r \r J 
 
 Now the integral of vdt is simply the excursion of the 
 pointer 0. The damping coefficient D is so small that 
 it may be neglected, and we thus get 
 
 /* 
 
 = J Edt 
 
 o 
 
 Since E is produced by the change of the flux 
 through the pilot coil of n turns, we also have 
 
THE FLUXOMETER 249 
 
 = n di 
 
 e / \ 
 
 Yl~~Y^ = ~9 ' (44) 
 
 The change of flux is proportional to the deflection 
 9, and the latter is independent of the rapidity with which 
 the change takes place. We have defined s as a 
 coefficient which, multiplied by the speed of the point 
 to which all quantities refer, gives the E.M.F. induced in 
 the fluxometer coil. Since we have assumed this point 
 to be i cm. from the centre of rotation, 9 is not only a 
 length but also an angle, and v is not only a linear 
 speed but also an angular speed. The dimensions of 
 vz are therefore those of an E.M.F. L f M*T~ 2 , whilst 
 those of v are T" 1 , giving for s 
 
 L f M*T- 1 
 
 the dimensions of a magnetic flux ; this is in accordance 
 with the above formula (44), for 9 and n are simply numbers 
 having no dimensions. The factor e is therefore a 
 constant for each instrument, and is equal to the 
 product of the flux produced by the permanent magnet 
 with twice the number of turns in the fluxometer coil 
 divided by the angular length of the arc spanned by 
 each pole-piece. The calibration of the instrument is 
 done empirically, and in one specimen in the Author's 
 possession 5=12300 when 9 is reckoned not in radians 
 but in scale divisions. For this particular instrument 
 one scale division represents therefore a flux of 
 
 n 
 
 lines of force. The smallest number of turns we can 
 have in the exploring or pilot coil is n= i, so that the 
 total range (the scale has on either side 100 divisions) 
 is a little over a megaline. The method of using the 
 instrument for taking the hysteresis loop of the iron of 
 
250 
 
 TRANSFORMERS 
 
 a transformer is shown diagrammatically in Fig. 129. 
 Two terminals of the transformer T are joined to the 
 supply terminals, K, K, of a source of continuous current 
 through a reversing switch A, amperemeter A, and 
 regulating resistance R. P is the exploring coil, con- 
 sisting of a simple loop, and this is connected with the 
 fluxometer F. If the transformer be very small, it may 
 be possible to use one of the windings as an exploring 
 coil. To take the hysteretic loop proceed as follows. 
 Set R to zero E.M.F. and put the fluxometer to zero 
 mechanically. Then shift R so that a current I is 
 indicated on A and observe the deflection of the fluxo- 
 
 FIG. 129. Testing transformer by fluxometer. 
 
 meter. Put fluxometer to zero again and then take another 
 step on R, observing again the new value of the current 
 and the new deflection on the fluxometer. Proceeding 
 thus step by step we get the positive rising branch of 
 the loop, the descending branch is found by bringing R 
 back in steps to zero. Then S is reversed and the whole 
 process repeated for the negative part of the loop. 
 When the loop is plotted take the area f\d$ by plani- 
 meter. The energy wasted in one cycle is obviously 
 T/jicryiflty, where n^ is the number of turns of the 
 magnetising coil. If there be butt-joints the hysteretic 
 loop will be sheared over, but its area will not be altered, 
 since air has no hysteresis. Let A be the area of cross- 
 
THE FLUXOMETER 
 
 251 
 
 section of carcase, and K its weight in kg., then the 
 hysteretic loss at frequency v is for the whole carcase in 
 watt- 
 area of loop x IGT^/Z! = aior 8 vn 1 
 
 and the loss in watt per kg. is 
 for the induction 
 
 To calculate the loss per kg. is, of course, only possible 
 if the cross-section is con- 
 stant throughout the mag- 
 netic circuit. 
 
 The value of < is taken 
 from the loop ; as a check 
 it may also be taken directly 
 by reversing S and observ- 
 ing the fluxometer. The 
 
 deflection will then be twice FlG - 130. Varying range of fluxometer. 
 
 that corresponding to (, and 
 
 the direct method is with this particular instrument there- 
 fore only applicable for values of  under o'6 megaline. 
 
 It is, however, possible to increase the range of the 
 instrument so that it may be used for measuring the 
 flux passing through any, even the largest transformer. 
 
 Let in Fig. 130 P be the pilot coil of one turn 
 encircling the flux <. Join its leads to an inductionless 
 resistance Rj, and from a small fraction of this resistance 
 take leads to the fluxometer whose resistance is r. In 
 the instrument mentioned above r is a little under 20 
 ohm. If we make R about o'l ohm then only ^ per 
 cent, of the current going through the coil will be shunted 
 through the fluxometer, so that practically the same 
 current will flow through the whole of the resistance R 1? 
 and the E.M.F. impressed on the fluxometer will be to 
 the total E.M.F. generated in P as R : R x . The resist- 
 ance of the fluxometer need not be accurately known. 
 All that we require to know accurately is the ratio 
 
252 TRANSFORMERS 
 
 of R : Rj. Let Rj = ;;zR, then on reversing the magnet- 
 ising current and thus producing a change in the linkage 
 of P amounting to 2 (/> we have 
 
 ...... (45) 
 
 Since only the ratio of R to R x , and not their absolute 
 values, are of importance, temperature does not affect the 
 accuracy of the method, and copper may be used for the 
 resistance coil, which should be wound bifilarly. Making 
 m = 2O the range of the fluxometer can be increased to 
 about 12 megalines. 
 
 Scotfs method. Mr. C. F. Scott l has devised a very 
 ingenious method for plotting the curve connecting excit- 
 ing current and flux in any magnetic circuit by making 
 use of the law that constant E.M.F. in the pilot coil means 
 proportionality between flux and time. In its simplest 
 form the test is carried out as follows : Through the fine 
 wire winding of a large transformer, which we will call 
 the primary winding, we send a current which can be 
 regulated between a positive and negative maximum 
 at any time rate that may be required to keep the 
 E.M.F. in the secondary winding constant. This 
 winding is connected to a sensitive voltmeter, and the 
 deflection must be kept constant whilst the primary 
 current is made to change from a positive maximum 
 value to an equal negative maximum value. The test 
 requires three observers ; one watches the voltmeter and 
 operates the regulating appliance for the. current, the 
 second marks time, and the third reads on an ampere- 
 meter the primary current and books it against the time. 
 The observations thus yield in the first instance merely 
 a time-current curve, but as by reason of the secondary 
 E.M.F. being constant B and t are proportional, the 
 curve may by a suitable change of scale, also be made to 
 represent the relation between induction and exciting 
 force, and if the carcase contains no butt-joints also the 
 true hysteretic loop. 
 
 Various appliances can be devised for current regula- 
 
 1 " On Testing Large Transformers," by I. S. Peck, EL World and 
 Engineer, 1901, p. 1083 ante. 
 
SCOTT'S METHOD 
 
 253 
 
 tion, but I have found two filaments of mercury as shown 
 in Fig. 131 a very convenient form of rheostat. The 
 contacts are attached to a block of wood, which is provided 
 with a handle, and can be moved longitudinally on the 
 board ; the latter has two grooves planed out for the 
 reception of the mercury. Current is supplied by a few 
 secondary cells and measured in A. If the sliding 
 block is in the middle no current flows ; if it be shifted 
 to the right the magnetising coil of % turns receives 
 current in one direction, and if shifted to the left in the 
 other direction. V is a millivoltmeter connected to the 
 secondary winding of n turns. In the diagram the two 
 windings are shown on different limbs ; this is merely 
 
 FIG. 131. Scott's method. 
 
 done to avoid complication. In reality both windings 
 are on both limbs. Both instruments have central zero. 
 Assume a carcase without butt-joints and let A be 
 the section and / the length of the magnetic circuit, then 
 the current passing through the millivoltmeter of resist- 
 ance R will be in ampere 
 
 . nA dE 
 
 corresponding to the E.M.F. in volt 
 
 - r 
 at 
 
 R may be considered to include the resistance of the 
 
254 
 
 TRANSFORMERS 
 
 O/d Current 
 
 secondary winding, which is, however, generally very 
 small in comparison with the 100 ohm or so of the 
 voltmeter. If, however, a milliamperemeter be used to 
 indicate the E.M.F., then its resistance is much lower 
 (with Siemens' instruments exactly i ohm), and the 
 resistance of the secondary winding must be included in R. 
 The ratio for changing the scale of / in seconds to B 
 in C.G.S. units is therefore 
 
 i : 
 
 The current i necessary to work the voltmeter is very 
 
 small, and when we are testing 
 a large transformer negligible 
 in comparison with the mag- 
 netising current I lf but when 
 testing a small transformer and 
 when for V a milliamperemeter 
 is used the current i may 
 produce a sensible magnetising 
 effect on the carcase, and has 
 to be considered in determin- 
 ing the ratio between excit- 
 ing current, which is directly 
 plotted, and the magnetic force 
 H, which we require, if we 
 wish to plot the hysteresis loop. We have 
 
 TT __ . (#1 1 + ni 
 I 
 
 where I takes all values between the maxima I . 
 
 Let in Fig. 132 dWd be the time-current curve 
 plotted from the original observations. Before moving 
 the slider the magnetising current is + \ Q = oa. Im- 
 mediately the movement begins the current passes to 
 
 T t T n 
 h = oa = 1 1 
 
 where the second term is the pilot current i reduced to 
 the primary winding. In the diagram it is a f a = i Q . If 
 we wish to leave off the process exactly at the same 
 
 FIG. 132. Scott test. 
 
SCOTT S METHOD 255 
 
 negative induction as it was before we must continue to 
 move the slider until A indicates I 2 = (I + / )- As 
 soon as the movement stops z' becomes zero, and we have 
 I 2 = - I . From a preliminary test we find io. If then 
 we start the test with a current + Ii, we must continue 
 until the current is I 2 = (Ij + 2/o). This gives equal 
 positive and negative induction. Shifting the curve 
 a'b'c' originally plotted to the right by the distance z' 
 we get the curve abc, and symmetrically to this the curve 
 cda to complete the loop. This gives as yet only the 
 relation between time and current corrected for the dis- 
 turbing effect of the pilot current. To get the true 
 hysteretic loop H-B we must alter the scales as already 
 stated. The operation may be shown by the following 
 example. In a transformer having 670 primary and 
 100 secondary turns A is 70 sq. cm. and / 136 cm. 
 The resistance of the secondary is 0*038 and that of 
 the milliamperemeter used for V in Fig. 128 is i ohm. 
 The total time taken to perform the change from 
 4- B to B is 34 seconds, the instrument V showing 
 steady 30 millivolt or 0*03 ampere. This gives 
 
 0-03 = 
 
 1-038 at 
 
 B 
 
 Since t is one half 34 we find 
 
 To make Fig. 132 represent a true hysteretic loop we 
 must use such a scale for the ordinates that #0 = 7514. 
 To find the scale for the abscissae we determine 
 
 100 
 /o = ^ 0-03 = 0-0045 ampere 
 
 The test is started with 0#' = o*28 ampere and finished 
 with - (0-28 + 2 x 0*0045) ampere. We have 
 
 I = o*28 + 0*0045 =0*2845 
 
 i TJ 1*2^.670.0*284^ 
 
 and H = - ^ - ' ^L=\-^^ 
 
 136 
 
2 5 6 
 
 TRA NS FORMERS 
 
 The scale for the abscissae must therefore be so chosen as 
 to make oa= 175. The area of the loop divided by 4?r 
 gives the energy in erg which is used up in hysteresis 
 by the whole carcase if this is taken through a complete 
 cycle between 6 = 7514. 
 
 This energy may also be found as follows. The 
 reactance E.M.F. in the primary is obviously 
 
 =e- 
 
 n 
 
 and the power absorbed by the iron at any moment is 
 0J. The total energy is the integral of e^dt taken 
 between the limits shown in the time current loop ; that 
 is to say, the energy is e l times the area of the loop. As 
 
 FIG. 133. Scott test as altered by Morris and Lister. 
 
 the latter is obtained in coulomb and ^ is given in watt 
 the product will be joule. 
 
 If the carcase has joints the loop obtained will not 
 be the true hysteretic loop, but its area will still give the 
 energy wasted in hysteresis, since air is not a hysteretic 
 substance. 
 
 The necessity of making a correction for the magne- 
 tising force of the pilot current can be avoided by adopt- 
 ing an arrangement proposed by Messrs. Morris and 
 Lister, 1 whereby the E.M.F. in the pilot coil is balanced 
 by an externally provided E.M.F., so that no pilot 
 current flows. The magnetisation of the carcase is then 
 due to the primary current only. In Fig. 133 the 
 external source for balancing the E.M.F. in the pilot 
 coil n is a battery B sending a heavy current through 
 
 1 Journal Inst. EL Eng., 1906, vol. 37. 
 
KAPPS METHOD 257 
 
 the fixed resistance W and rheostat R. As soon as the 
 switch S is closed a P.D. will be maintained between the 
 terminals of W, and this may be read off on the milli- 
 amperemeter M. G is a detector showing whether 
 current is flowing through the pilot coil or not. During 
 the test the operator of the sliding contact watches G 
 and keeps its needle at zero. L is an inductance in- 
 serted to make this task easier by steadying the primary 
 current, and u is a reversing switch so that the operation 
 may be repeated in the opposite sense. 
 
 Kapp's method. In the author's method l a time- 
 current curve is also taken, but the current is not regu- 
 lated by an operator. It is simply allowed to flow under 
 a constant impressed E.M.F. Let < be the flux in 
 megalines produced by a continuous current of I amperes 
 through n turns of winding under an E.M.F. of e volts, 
 then 
 
 If now e be suddenly reversed, then I will pass from its 
 initial value I through zero to the final value -f I - 
 Any intermediate value of the current must obviously 
 satisfy the equation 
 
 =*.^+RI ..... (46) 
 TOO at 
 
 By observing t and I a time-current curve may be plotted, 
 and from this curve and the known values of e and n the 
 hysteresis loop giving < as a function of I may be drawn. 
 The arrangement of the test is shown in Fig. 134. 
 
 B is a source of current 2 capable of giving from 50 
 to 100 times the magnetising current I , which is passed 
 through the transformer coil T. This current is taken 
 off on the heavy shunt resistance S, between whose 
 
 1 Journal Inst. EL Eng., 1907, vol. 39. 
 
 2 In a modified arrangement due to Mr. Dennis Coales, two equal 
 batteries are used coupled up in opposition. One of the batteries is 
 shunted by a rheostat so that its terminal E.M.F. becomes lower than 
 that of the other. The balance being thus disturbed, the resultant 
 E.M.F. of the two batteries is no longer zero. It can be adjusted by 
 the rheostat to the same value as that obtained in the Author's original 
 arrangement between the terminals of S. 
 
2 5 8 
 
 TRANSFORMERS 
 
 terminals the E.M.F. e is maintained and indicated on 
 the voltmeter V. A is an amperemeter with a central 
 zero and ^ a reversing switch. Care must be taken to 
 have the contacts of this switch in good order, so that 
 its resistance may be exactly the same in either position. 
 S may conveniently be the shunt belonging to V, so that 
 this is instrumental in indicating the main current given 
 by B. All connections should be of sufficiently stout 
 wire, and A should be of sufficiently low resistance to 
 
 FIG. 134. Kapp's test. 
 
 reduce the loss of E.M.F. between S and T as much as 
 possible. 
 
 To make the test, regulate r so that A indicates the 
 desired magnetising current I and note the E.M.F. e. 
 Then knock s sharply over, starting at the same time a 
 stop-watch and noting the current indicated by A as a 
 function of the time. The movement of the needle for 
 values of I lying between I and zero is fairly quick, so 
 that in this region only single observations can be taken 
 by stopping the watch at the moment that the pointer 
 passes a predetermined point on the scale. After the 
 zero has been passed the movement becomes sufficiently 
 slow for a continuous series of co-ordinate values of 
 
KAPPS METHOD 259 
 
 current and time to be noted. For transformers of 
 similar type the speed of the needle is approximately 
 proportional to the f power of the output. Thus, if 
 with a lo-kw. transformer zero is reached in 4 seconds, 
 it would be reached in about 6^ seconds with a 2O-kw. 
 and in about 16 seconds with an 8o-kw. transformer. 
 The shape of the time-current curve is of the character 
 shown in Fig. 132. If there were no hysteretic loss, it 
 would be a true logarithmic curve, but owing to the 
 influence of hysteresis there is a depression in the upper 
 part as shown. 
 
 From (46) we have 
 
 n 
 
 looR/j 
 n 
 
 Now I I is the length of the ordinate between the 
 curve and the + I line, so that f(\Ql)dt is the area 
 enclosed between the curve and this line. Integrating 
 between the limits < and + < , to which correspond 
 the times o and t^ we find 
 
 i I OO -LV x"x / v 
 
 2 fa= -^ Qo (47) 
 
 if by Qo we denote the whole area between the curve and 
 its asymptote. 
 
 Integrating between the limits < and +<, to which 
 correspond the times o and /, we find 
 
 )o-Q) . '. . . ( 4 8) 
 
 By combining (47) and (48) we get 
 
260 
 
 TRANSFORMERS 
 
 Q is the shaded area in Fig. 135. Having fixed on a 
 value of I, we find by planimeter the corresponding area 
 Q, and from (49) the corresponding value of the flux (. 
 
 It is thus easy to find by means of a planimeter corre- 
 sponding values of I and <, and to plot these as shown 
 in Fig. 134. The hysteretic energy per cycle is 
 obviously 
 
 E = 
 
 n 
 
 100 
 
 x area of loop 
 
 If there are no joints in the .carcase, and its cross- 
 
 FIG. 135. Kapp's test. 
 
 sectional dimensions are such as to make the induction 
 the same in any part, the true B-H loop can, of course, 
 be plotted, and the permeability as a function of the 
 induction may also be found. In most cases, however, 
 a knowledge of the exact shape of the B-H loop and of 
 the permeability is of secondary importance ; what we 
 require is a knowledge of the hysteretic loss in the whole 
 transformer, and this may be found graphically from 
 Fig. 135 without even drawing the loop. 
 
 The hysteretic energy absorbed by the carcase in one 
 half-cycle is obviously the difference between 
 
 r l 
 efldt 
 
KAPPS METHOD 261 
 
 the total energy supplied, and 
 
 the energy lost in copper heat. The latter quantity may 
 be expressed in the form 
 
 'i T ^ 
 
 Rio f \\-dt or e fl'dt 
 
 +s +J 
 
 ft *0 
 
 where I' = I can be determined graphically by the con- 
 struction shown by dotted lines in Fig. 135. The 
 hysteretic energy for one half-cycle is, therefore 
 
 o 4 
 
 i- = el (I - V\dt watt-second 
 2 < 
 
 The integral is the area (expressed in coulomb) between 
 the original time-current curve, and the new I' curve 
 shown in a dotted line. The area is to be taken with 
 reference to the sign of the current ; that is to say, 
 negative up to the point I = o and positive for I > o. By 
 plani metering the two areas and deducting that which 
 is negative, we find 
 
 This construction applies to any transformer, whether it 
 has joints or not, and whether the induction is the same 
 throughout the magnetic path or not. 
 
CHAPTER XII 
 
 SAFETY APPLIANCES FOR TRANSFORMERS 
 SUB-STATION AND HOUSE TRANSFORMERS- 
 REDUCING IRON LOSSES TRANSFORMER FOR 
 THREE-WIRE SYSTEM BALANCING TRANS- 
 FORMERSA UTO - TRANSFORMERS SERIES 
 WORKING BOOSTERS SCOTT'S SYSTEM 
 
 Safety appliances for transformers. The reason why 
 we use transformers is that we may carry the power 
 under high pressure, and distribute it under low or 
 moderate pressure. It is, however, an essential condition 
 that the insulation between the transmission circuit 
 (primary) and the distributing circuit (secondary) be 
 absolutely perfect. If this condition be not fulfilled, the 
 use of transformers may even become dangerous on 
 account of an unjustified feeling of security. The two 
 windings in a transformer must necessari-ly lie in close 
 proximity, and thus an injury to the insulation may 
 cause a leakage of current and a transfer of pressure from 
 the primary to the secondary coil. Since in a widely 
 distributed network of primary conductors their insula- 
 tion cannot be absolutely perfect, it will be obvious that 
 any leak between the primary and secondary coil of any 
 particular transformer may raise the absolute potential of 
 the secondary to a dangerous amount. This potential 
 will depend on the position of the leak in the transformer, 
 on the position of the equivalent leak in the general 
 system of high pressure or primary circuits, and on the 
 insulation of the secondary circuit. It may be a few 
 hundred volts only, or it may be equal to the full primary 
 voltage. If in the latter case a person touches any part 
 of the secondary circuit he will receive a dangerous or 
 fatal shock. To avoid this danger several expedients 
 are possible. One very obvious preventive is to place 
 
 262 
 
SAFETY APPLIANCES FOR TRANSFORMERS 263 
 
 between the two windings a metallic dividing-sheet which 
 is well earthed. If the insulation between the two 
 windings is damaged, contact is not made between the 
 primary and secondary direct, but through the interven- 
 tion of this dividing sheet, and thus the potential of the 
 secondary is prevented from rising to any dangerous 
 extent. This appliance ensures safety only in so far as 
 regards a leak from one winding to the other, but it is 
 useless against a leak in any other part of the trans- 
 former ; for instance, between the primary and secondary 
 leading-in wires, or between the terminals of the two 
 circuits. Even if by good workmanship the danger of a 
 leak in the transformer itself, or its terminal boards, could 
 be completely eliminated, there still remains the possi- 
 bility of a contact or leak between the supply wires. An 
 obvious case is that where both the high and low 
 pressure circuits are overhead, and so near each other 
 that a branch of a tree blown across them by the wind 
 bridges the two circuits. It is, of course, not good 
 practice to use the same posts for both circuits, but in 
 certain localities for instance, immediately outside a 
 transforming station proximity is sometimes unavoid- 
 able ; and to exclude any danger from such causes it is 
 wise to act on the principle that the line, rather than the 
 transformer, should be fitted with the safety appliance. 
 The transformer itself is the least vulnerable part of the 
 system, and requires protection less than the line, but if 
 the line is protected, the transformer is also protected. 
 
 One way of protecting line and transformer simul- 
 taneously is to earth some point of the secondary circuit, 
 preferably the middle of the winding in a single-phase 
 or the star point in a three-phase transformer, since then 
 the potential difference of the secondary mains to earth 
 becomes a minimum, namely, equal to half, or very little 
 more than half the line voltage. If contact takes place 
 anywhere between primary and secondary, the former is 
 thereby connected to earth, and all danger of a fatal 
 shock is avoided. The danger as regards fire is, on the 
 other hand, increased by this expedient. If the whole 
 of the secondary circuit is insulated from earth, a fault 
 must occur at two places of different potential before a 
 
264 
 
 TRANSFORMERS 
 
 danger in respect of fire can arise, but if one point of 
 the secondary circuit is permanently connected to earth, 
 a fault occurring in one place only is sufficient to create 
 danger. The margin of safety is therefore reduced by 
 one-half if we earth a point of the secondary winding. 
 
 There is also increased danger of damage by atmo- 
 spheric electricity. A system completely insulated from 
 earth is less liable to be struck by lightning than one 
 which has somewhere an earth-connection. Finally, 
 there is the objection that such a system may give rise 
 to capacity currents (the coils in the transformer as well 
 as those in the generator have capacity to each other 
 and to earth) which disturb telephonic work. For all 
 these reasons the simple expedient of permanently earth- 
 ing one point of the secondary 
 circuit cannot be considered 
 a generally applicable, or even 
 when applied, a satisfactory 
 way of protecting the low- 
 pressure circuits of trans- 
 formers against the infiltration 
 of high-pressure. 
 
 The trouble about in- 
 creased fire and lightning 
 danger and telephonic dis- 
 turbance can be overcome if the earth-connection is not 
 permanent, but only established at the moment when it 
 is wanted. This was the leading idea in a safety 
 appliance introduced quite early in the history of trans- 
 formers by the Thomson- Houston Company in America. 
 The appliance consists of an earth-plate and two 
 metal knobs, a, b, Fig. 136, which are connected to the 
 secondary mains. Between the knobs and the earth- 
 plate is inserted a thin sheet of insulating material 
 (paraffined paper or mica). As long as no fault between 
 primary and secondary occurs, the potential difference 
 between the knobs and the earth-plate remains within 
 the limit of the secondary voltage, and this is not sufficient 
 to break down the insulation between knobs and earth. 
 If, however, through a fault in the insulation between 
 secondary and primary, the secondary assumes the poten- 
 
 FIG. 136. Protection against rise 
 of pressure. 
 
SAFETY APPLIANCES FOR TRANSFORMERS 265 
 
 tial of the primary, the insulation between a and earth 
 and b and earth is broken down, thereby short-circuiting 
 the secondary winding. The primary current then rises 
 to such an amount that the safety fuses s, s go, and 
 the transformer is thereby automatically cut out of 
 circuit. 
 
 The same principle has more recently been revived 
 in an improved form by Prof. Goerges in his safety-plug, 
 which is being manufactured by the Siemens-Schnokert- 
 Werke, Berlin. Here, also, one electrode of the plug is 
 connected with the line to be protected, and the other 
 with earth, but the mica insertion is only used as a 
 distance-piece and not as a body which must be pierced 
 by the discharge to earth. 
 
 Externally the safety-plug resembles the well-known 
 fuse-plugs commonly used on the Continent for pro- 
 tection against excessive rise of current, but instead of 
 a fuse embedded in emery powder, the plug contains 
 two metal electrodes insulated from each other by the 
 body and screw of the plug, which are of porcelain, and 
 a thin mica disc pierced with four holes of 3*5 mm. 
 diameter. The electrodes are perfectly smooth circular 
 plates, and their distance apart is determined by the 
 thickness of the mica disc. In case of undue rise of 
 pressure between them, a spark passes through one or 
 more of the holes, and this welds the two discs together, 
 thus providing an efficient connection to earth, or the 
 other circuits similarly protected. 
 
 It is important to notice that in this plug even a very 
 small current suffices to produce the welding together of 
 the electrodes through the holes in the mica, so that 
 even an incipient fault will be detected and rendered 
 inocuous by this plug. The fact that welding takes 
 place already with a very minute current makes the 
 action independent of the goodness of the earth-con- 
 nection. It is well known that an " earth " good enough 
 to carry off large currents is generally very difficult to 
 provide, but so good an earth is not required for the 
 Goerges plug, since a current as small as 0*0345 ampere l 
 
 1 Elektrotechnische Zeitsckrift, 1905, p. 314. 
 
266 
 
 TRANSFORMERS 
 
 is sufficient to produce welding. If then the earth is not 
 good enough to carry off sufficient current to lower the 
 pressure, the other plug will come into action, thus short- 
 circuiting the low-pressure leads, and causing the fuses 
 on the primary to blow, and thus removing all danger. 
 The pressure at which the plug acts depends on the 
 thickness of the mica insertion. With 0*12 mm. the 
 pressure is 800 volt. After a plug has acted it can be 
 put into working order again by cleaning off the welded 
 parts with emery paper, and turning the electrodes so as 
 to bring parts of the original surfaces facing each other 
 through the holes. The right length of spark-gap is 
 obtained by simply screwing the plug down tight on to 
 the mica. 
 
 A safety device invented by Major Cardew is shown 
 
 in Fig. 137. In this 
 arrangement the 
 action depends on 
 electrostatic attrac- 
 tion between a plate 
 E connected to the 
 secondary, and an 
 aluminium foil lying 
 on a plate connected 
 to earth. The alu- 
 minium foil has the 
 form of two discs 
 connected by a narrow bridge, and is together with 
 the two plates enclosed in a box, provision being made 
 by means of a screw thread in the cover of the box 
 to accurately adjust the distance between the plate 
 E and the aluminium foil. The latter is permanently 
 kept at the potential of the earth (zero), whilst the plate 
 E has under ordinary circumstances a potential not 
 exceeding the secondary voltage. The electrostatic 
 attraction corresponding to this potential difference is 
 insufficient to raise the foil ; if, however, a fault occurs 
 between primary and secondary, the potential difference 
 immediately rises to such an amount that the electrostatic 
 attraction suffices to raise the foil and bring it into contact 
 with the plate E, thereby earthing the secondary wind- 
 
 Earth 
 
 FIG. 137. Cardew's safely device. 
 
SAFETY APPLIANCES FOR TRANSFORMERS 267 
 
 ing. In the safety device first described by Cardew 1 
 a fuse S was provided and arranged to hold up a weight 
 which, if the fuse melted, would short-circuit the primary 
 leads, and thus cause their fuses s, s to go, and the trans- 
 former to be cut out of circuit. It has, however, been 
 found that when a good earth is obtainable this is a 
 superfluous refinement, since the short produced on the 
 secondary by the lifting of the aluminium foil is in itself 
 sufficient to make the primary fuses go. The apparatus 
 can be set to come into action if the potential of the 
 secondary rises to 400 volt. 
 Hence even an incipient 
 fault in insulation between 
 the two circuits is sufficient 
 to automatically disconnect 
 the transformer from the 
 circuit. 
 
 Ferranti's safety device 
 is shown in Fig. 138. The 
 secondary mains are con- 
 nected to the primaries 
 of two very small trans- 
 formers coupled in series, 
 whilst their secondaries are 
 coupled in parallel. The 
 secondaries are connected 
 to a fuse carrying a conical 
 weight over a correspond- 
 ing set of terminals. The 
 connection between the two primaries is joined to earth, 
 as is also one of the terminals, the other two being 
 joined to the secondary mains. As long as the insulation 
 between the primary and secondary circuits of the main 
 transformer is perfect, there is absolute balance between 
 the E.M.Fs. of the secondary windings of the two small 
 auxiliary transformers, and no current passes through the 
 fuse. If, however, a fault occurs, the balance is disturbed, 
 a current passes through the fuse and melts it, and the 
 weight falling between the terminals short-circuits the 
 
 FIG. 138. Ferranti's safety device. 
 
 1 Journal Inst. EL Eng., Vol. XVII, p. 179. 
 
268 TRANSFORMERS 
 
 secondary mains, and puts them to earth. The primary 
 fuses s, s are thereby caused to blow, thus cutting the faulty 
 transformer completely out of circuit. It is important 
 to note that this safety device is a protection, not only 
 against a real short between primary and secondary, but 
 even against an incipient fault of insulation between the 
 two circuits. 
 
 The safety devices here described and others on 
 similar principles are quite reliable where the secondary 
 mains are fed by one transformer only, and being within 
 a building or underground, are not subject to disturbance 
 from atmospheric electricity. The Goerges plug is even 
 applicable on an underground network fed by several 
 transformers in parallel, but when we have to protect 
 overhead low-pressure mains, all these devices, although 
 still ensuring safety, are liable to come into action by 
 reason of a passing disturbance through atmospheric 
 electricity. What is required is a safety device which 
 will discriminate between a rise of pressure due to an 
 atmospheric cause, and therefore lasting only a very 
 short time, and a permanent rise of pressure due to a 
 leak or short-circuit between the low-tension and high- 
 tension series. The device should not be of the nature 
 of a delicate physical apparatus, but rather of the nature 
 of a substantial appliance fit to be put into an engine- 
 room or sub-station, and should require no attention. 
 Up to the present no such implement has been put on 
 the market. 
 
 Sub-station and house transformers. It is convenient 
 to make a distinction between transformers placed into 
 a secondary distributing centre and large enough to 
 supply current to a number of distinct consumers and 
 transformers placed on the premises of each consumer. 
 In the first case we speak of sub-station transformers, 
 and in the second of house transformers. If we except 
 consumers of large powers where the pressure supplied 
 to the installation need not be limited by other considera- 
 tions than appertain to the wiring, switch-gear, and the 
 motors themselves, we may take it that for a general 
 lighting and power service, whether given from a sub- 
 station or a house transformer, considerations of personal 
 
SUB-STATION AND HOUSE TRANSFORMERS 269 
 
 safety as well as the nature of glow-lamps impose a limit 
 on the pressure in the secondary circuit of the transformer. 
 With carbon filament lamps as at present made 220 volt, 
 or at most 250 volt may be considered as an upper limit 
 of working pressure, whilst with metallic filament glow- 
 lamps a still lower limit is as yet usual. Thus a low or 
 moderate pressure in the distributing circuit is a necessity, 
 whilst a high pressure in the transmission circuit is an 
 economic advantage, and, indeed, also a necessity, if the 
 transmission has to be effected over a considerable 
 distance. The transformer is then the intermediary 
 
 Li 
 
 
 r 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 i 
 
 FIG. 139. Distribution from sub-stations. 
 
 apparatus by which the two conditions, cheap mains and 
 moderate supply voltage, can be simultaneously fulfilled. 
 The typical arrangement of transformers for a sub-station 
 system is shown in Fig. 139. C denotes omnibus bars 
 in the central station ; S, s the primary transmission mains 
 or feeders ; T, T are transformers at two sub-stations, and 
 V, V the supply mains. Measuring instruments, switches, 
 and fuses are of course also required, but have been 
 omitted from the diagram to avoid complication. 
 
 The diagram shows each transformer supplied with 
 current by its own feeder, whilst on the secondary side 
 each transformer supplies a network of distributing 
 
2;o TRANSFORMERS 
 
 mains, which latter may be either separate from each 
 other, or they may be inter-connected, as shown by the 
 dotted lines. The inter-connection of secondary mains 
 has the advantage that a more nearly constant pressure 
 can be maintained throughout the secondary network, 
 and that at times of small demand some of the trans- 
 formers may be disconnected from the primary and 
 secondary mains, whereby the power wasted by them 
 when working an open circuit is saved. On the other 
 hand, there is the danger that a defect in one part of 
 the network may affect the whole system, and to mini- 
 mise this danger it is advisable to insert fuses into all 
 the important junctions of the secondary network. 
 Instead of using separate feeders to the different sub- 
 stations, we may also provide a primary network to 
 which the primary terminals of all the transformers are 
 connected in parallel. 
 
 When a district is supplied on the house-transformer 
 system a complete network of high-pressure feeding 
 and distributing mains conveys current to a large num- 
 ber of small transformers, each placed as near as possible 
 to the place where the low-pressure current is required 
 (i. e. one transformer to each house), so that no network 
 of secondary or low-pressure street mains is required. 
 The weight of copper in the street mains is thereby 
 much reduced, which is an advantage. On the other 
 hand, there are some drawbacks. Owing to the greater 
 length and the many junctions in the system of high- 
 pressure mains, the insulation is more difficult, the 
 high-pressure must be brought into the houses of the 
 consumers, and the loss of power in the transformers is 
 greater. Single transformers cannot be disconnected, 
 thus increasing the light-load loss, and even at heavy 
 load the loss of power is greater, since small transformers 
 cannot have as high an efficiency as large transformers, 
 and the total capacity of the transformers connected must 
 be greater than in the sub-station system. The constant 
 losses are therefore also greater. One house wired for 
 100 lamps may have sometimes 80 per cent, of its lamps, 
 or say as many as 80 lamps, alight, though this will not 
 happen very often. Twenty houses wired collectively 
 
SUB-STATION AND HOUSE TRANSFORMERS 271 
 
 for 2000 lamps will never use simultaneously 80 per cent, 
 that is, 1600 of the installed lamps but at most 1000, 
 or 50 per cent. In some cases, especially if the houses 
 are of widely different character (shops, offices, dwelling- 
 houses, restaurants), the maximum simultaneous load 
 may be even considerably less than 50 per cent, of the 
 total installed load. The ratio of the total maximum of 
 power supply observed in a given district to the sum of 
 the maxima observed at different times in each individual 
 house is called the diversity factor, and it is due to the 
 circumstance that this diversity factor is larger than 
 unity, that the total capacity of a sub-station may be 
 smaller than the collective capacity of house-transformers, 
 were the same districts supplied on the house-transformer 
 system. 
 
 Take a district in which 1000 kw. in motors and 
 lamps are installed. If it be supplied on the house- 
 transformer system the aggregate capacity of trans- 
 formers would be about 800 kw., made up of mostly 
 small sizes of, say, 2 to 10 kw. The aggregate iron 
 losses will be about 2^ per cent, or 20 kw., and the 
 copper losses about i|- per cent., or 12 kw. ; the latter 
 taking place, however, only during a short time daily. 
 The iron losses are going on all the year round, and the 
 energy wasted per annum is about 175,000 kw.-hrs. 
 The total copper loss is very much smaller ; we may 
 roughly estimate it at 5000 kw.-hrs. This is almost 
 negligible in comparison with the iron losses. If the 
 same district were supplied by two or three sub-stations, 
 the total capacity of sub-station transformers with a 
 diversity factor of 2 would only be 400 kw., and the 
 transformers at the sub-stations would be so large that 
 the iron losses need not exceed i per cent., or 4 kw. 
 The total annual iron loss would therefore be only 35,000 
 kw.-hrs. The copper losses will also be reduced, though 
 not in the same proportion, because, owing to the diversity 
 factor, each transformer will be working at a fair load 
 for a longer time daily. The annual copper loss may 
 be taken at about 3000 kw.-hrs. We thus find- 
 Energy wasted in house transformers . 180,000 kw.-hrs. 
 ,, ,, sub-station transformers 38,000 ,, 
 
272 TRANSFORMERS 
 
 If the total installed load is equally divided between 
 lighting and power, the energy sold per annum will be 
 about 400,000 kw.-hrs. for power, and 200,000 kw.-hrs.for 
 lighting, or 600,000 kw.-hrs. in all. The annual efficiency, 
 allowing 2 per cent, loss in the mains, will therefore 
 be 
 
 With house transformers ... 75 per cent. 
 With sub-station transformers . 92 ,, 
 
 The cost of house transformers, including terminal 
 boards and fuses, and a provision for housing them 
 safely that is, beyond the reach of unauthorised persons 
 is about ^4 a kw., whilst sub-station transformers, in- 
 cluding all accessory apparatus and their housing, may 
 be taken at half this amount. The initial outlay will 
 therefore respectively be ^3200 and ^800, showing a 
 saving of ^2400 in favour of the sub-station system. 
 At 10 per cent, for interest, repair, and amortisation, this 
 means an annual saving of ^240, to which must be 
 added the saving in energy wasted, which amounts to 
 1 42,000 kw.-hrs. Taking the engine-room cost at id. per 
 kw.-hr., this amounts to another ^590, making the total 
 saving ^830 annually. Against this has to be set the 
 increase in annual working expenses due to our having 
 to provide a secondary net-work. If the capital outlay 
 on this account exceeds % 6s. per installed kw., the 
 system of house transformers will be economically better ; 
 if the outlay for cables is less, it will be better to use 
 sub-stations. 
 
 These calculations have not been given as hard-and- 
 fast rules, but merely by way of example, how the com- 
 mercial advantages of the two systems may be compared. 
 A definite conclusion in any special case can, of course, 
 only be reached if all the conditions (such as annual 
 energy required per installed kw., diversity factor, extent 
 of district, cost of transformers and cables, and engine- 
 room cost of energy) are known, but from what has been 
 shown above we may postulate as a general principle 
 that the use of house transformers is commercially jus- 
 tified if power derived from a cheap source has to be 
 distributed in small parcels amongst widely scattered 
 
REDUCING IRON LOSSES 273 
 
 customers in country districts. In towns customers are 
 fairly close together and the power has a greater value, 
 hence sub-stations are economically preferable. 
 
 Reducing iron losses. There are cases where a 
 consumer is not within easy reach of a secondary 
 network and yet requires low-pressure current. In such 
 cases (schools, hospitals, asylums lying outside the town), 
 the general system of supply from sub-stations has to be 
 supplemented by house transformers. If the supply is 
 given mainly for lighting, the load factor that is, the ratio 
 between the' total energy in kw.-hrs. actually supplied 
 during the year to the energy represented by the product 
 of maximum demand in kw. multiplied by the 8760 hours 
 of the year is very small. For a purely lighting load 
 the demand factor that is, the ratio between maximum 
 demand observed and lamps installed will seldom exceed 
 So per cent., whilst the load factor for an isolated 
 installation will only be from 4 to 6 per cent. If the 
 transformer capable of supplying the maximum demand 
 has 2 per cent, iron loss and is kept under pressure all 
 the year round it will consume annually 175 units 
 magnetising energy per kw. capacity, whilst the energy 
 actually delivered to the lamps is only from 350 to 520 
 units. The annual efficiency of the transformer is there- 
 fore only f to f . A better efficiency would be obtained 
 by installing two or more transformers and switching them 
 into and out of circuit in accordance with the demand 
 actually existing at any time. This, however, would 
 entail an amount of personal supervision which only large 
 establishments could afford to provide, and then there 
 would be the danger of overloading a small transformer 
 if the attendant forgets to switch in the big transformer 
 at the right time. For this reason it is safer to work the 
 switch-gear automatically. Several such systems (some of 
 them also applicable to sub-stations) have been suggested 
 from time to time, and by way of example I give here 
 the latest device, designed by Mr. A. F. Berry. This 
 inventor uses two transformers coupled in series, one 
 small, the other large. As long as the demand does not 
 exceed the current capacity of the small transformer, this 
 is doing the greater part of the work, but if the demand 
 18 
 
274 
 
 TRA NSFORMER S 
 
 rises beyond a given limit, the primary and secondary of 
 the small transformer are simultaneously short-circuited, 
 and the large transformer is doing all the work alone. 
 The arrangement is shown diagrammatically, Fig. 140. 
 Tj is the small, and T the large transformer. The 
 secondary current is taken through on electromagnet E, 
 the armature of which rests on a lower contact as long 
 as the current is not strong enough to raise it. If the 
 demand has exceeded a predetermined limit, the attraction 
 of E is sufficient to raise the armature so that it comes 
 against the upper contact. The two contacts are 
 connected with the two coils of the solenoidal magnet E 1? 
 
 as shown, and accord- 
 ingly as one or the 
 other is in touch with 
 the armature the core 
 of this magnet is either 
 pulled down (light 
 load) or pulled up 
 (heavy load). When 
 in the latter position 
 the switch Si short- 
 circuits the primary, 
 and the switch S 2 the 
 secondary, of the small 
 transformer. A snap- 
 lock (not shown in the 
 diagram) is connected 
 with the core of the 
 solenoid which not only 
 holds the latter in position after each movement, but also 
 interrupts the current through the coils of the solenoid. 
 This is to prevent waste of current through these coils 
 during the time that they are not required to act. Mr. 
 Berry claims that the extra cost of this switch-gear and the 
 small transformer is compensated by the saving in capital 
 outlay on the large transformer. Since the latter is most 
 of the time only very slightly magnetised, it enters on the 
 period of its full load at a low temperature, and being 
 worked intermittently with long spells of rest between 
 short periods of load, it may, as was shown in Chapter VI, 
 
 FIG. 140. Berry's system of automatic control. 
 
TRANSFORMER FOR THREE-WIRE SYSTEM 275 
 
 be made smaller than a transformer continuously under 
 pressure. 
 
 Transformer for three-wire system. The well-known 
 system of continuous current distribution by three wires 
 can also be employed in connection with transformers. 
 We need only connect the middle point o of the secondary 
 winding, Fig. 141, to the zero wire, and the outer 
 terminals m, n of this winding to the two outer wires. 
 The primary leads s consist 
 of two wires only connected 
 to the primary terminals^, 
 
 q. The lamps a, b are con- | &AAAA A 
 nected between the outer q-n, T I T T T 
 
 Wires and the zero wire 0. Fig< I4I< _ Se condary three-wire system. 
 
 The pressure between m 
 
 and n is double the lamp voltage, and we are thus 
 able, exactly as in the ordinary three-wire system, to 
 effect considerable economies in the cost of the dis- 
 tributing mains. Care must, however, be taken to group 
 the different coils of the secondary winding in such way 
 that the ampere-turns produced by the two secondary 
 currents have the same value in all parts of the magnetic 
 circuit. If this is not done, the leakage or inductive 
 drop would be greater on the more heavily loaded part 
 
 I 9 <*> 
 
 <><> 
 
 T 
 
 FIG. 142. Secondary three-wire system with balancing transformer. 
 
 of the system, and the supply voltage would be unevenly 
 divided between the two groups of lamps. 
 
 Balancing transformers. It may happen that the sub- 
 station must be placed at some distance from the district 
 to be lighted. In this case the middle wire need not be 
 brought back to the sub-station transformer T, Fig. 142, 
 if a balancing transformer Tj is established in some point 
 of the district to be lighted. The output of the balancing 
 transformer need not be larger than half the maximum 
 
2 ;6 TRANSFORMERS 
 
 difference between the loads on the two sides a y b of the 
 system. Let i a be the maximum current in a and i b the 
 current which simultaneously obtains in b, then one coil 
 of the balancing transformer must take up the current 
 
 "7 __ 7 
 
 - and its other coil must give off an equal current. 
 If the lamp voltage is e, then the output of the balancing 
 transformer is given by the expression ( -- b je, the out- 
 put of the sub-station transformer at the same time being 
 = (i a + t b )e. Since it is, however, possible that 
 
 both sides of the system may occasionally carry the 
 maximum current, the sub-station transformer must be 
 designed for an output of 2t a e. If by / we denote the 
 ratio of load difference between the two sides to the 
 maximum load on one side, we have 
 
 The output of the balancing transformer must therefore be 
 
 2** 
 
 Since i a e is half the output of the sub-station trans- 
 former, we have the ratio between its size and that of 
 the balancing transformer given by the fraction 4 : p. 
 Thus for a load difference of 100, 50, 20, 10 per cent, 
 
 the balancing transformer would be respectively , , 
 
 4 8 
 
 , the size of the sub-station transformer. These 
 20 40 
 
 figures show that a comparatively very small balancing 
 transformer may render it superfluous to carry the middle 
 wire of the system back to the sub-station. 
 
 Another application of balancing transformers may be 
 made in adapting a single continuous-current generator 
 to a three-wire system. Let in Fig. 143 the outer circle 
 represent the armature of an ordinary continuous-current 
 generator supplying current to the outer wires a, b of a 
 three-wire system. Then by taking from two tapping 
 
A UTOTRANSFORMERS 277 
 
 points connections to the slip-rings (represented in the 
 diagram by the two inner circles) we obtain at their 
 brushes an alternating voltage whose crest value is equal 
 to the voltage on the outer mains. The brushes of the 
 slip-rings are connected to a balancing transformer such 
 as is shown in Fig. 142. From what has been explained 
 in connection with this diagram it will be obvious that 
 the middle point, o, of the winding of this trans- 
 former divides the pressure between a and b equally, pro- 
 vided both windings are as intimately mixed as the 
 primary and secondary of an ordinary transformer. The 
 zero wire may then be connected to the point o. 
 
 The balancing transformer must, of course, be de- 
 signed for the frequency 
 corresponding to the con- 
 tinuous-current machine. 
 This is 
 
 v =pu 
 
 where p is the number of 
 pairs of poles and u the 
 speed in revolutions per 
 second. As an instance 
 
 take a six-pole generator Fig " ^--Balancing transformer. 
 
 running at 120 revolutions 
 
 per minute. The frequency will be 6. Let the output be 
 200 kw. at 500 volt, then the full-load current will be 400 
 ampere. Let the greatest out of balance current be 
 10 per cent., then the transformer will have to take in 
 20 ampere on its primary and give out 20 ampere on 
 its secondary side, the terminal pressure on each side 
 being 250 volt crest value, or 180 volt effective value. 
 A transformer wound for an output of 3*6 kw. at 6 fre- 
 quency and transforming ratio of i : i will therefore 
 suffice for this purpose. It is important to design the 
 transformer for a very small copper loss so as to ensure 
 equal division of pressure, but it will be seen from this 
 example that the balancing transformer, even if designed 
 on a very liberal scale, will be only a small accessory to 
 the generator. 
 
 Autotransformers. Balancing transformers may also 
 
278 TRANSFORMERS 
 
 be used for subdividing a given supply pressure between 
 a number of circuits, so that lamps requiring a lower 
 pressure than that supplied may be used individually on 
 these circuits. Originally used for arc lamps, this method 
 of subdividing pressure has, with the advent of the 
 metallic filament lamp, acquired additional importance. 
 Balancing transformers arranged for this purpose are 
 generally called autotransformers, because part of the 
 winding is traversed by the difference of the two currents, 
 and only the rest of the winding is traversed by the high- 
 pressure current only. This arrangement is instrumental 
 in a certain saving of material, so that an autotransformer 
 
 is smaller and cheaper than a 
 
 I r - 5 - r - 1 2 transformer with two distinct 
 windings. The extent to which 
 
 j 2 material may be saved can be 
 
 seen from the following con- 
 sideration- 
 
 Let in Fig. 144 oa be that 
 
 . _ I part of the winding which is 
 
 b transversed by the difference 
 
 FIG. i 44 . -Autotransformer. ! 2 - Ii of the two currents, and 
 
 ob the remainder which is tra- 
 
 versed by the current l l alone. Let oa consist of n^ and 
 ob of n 1 n z turns, and let the transforming ratio be 
 
 0tf 
 
 m = . Then I 2 = m\ ly and as equal current density gives 
 
 the best utilisation of the material we have qz = qi(m 0- 
 The total volume of copper will therefore be 
 
 m) ^ * 'm 
 
 m i 
 
 v = 
 
 m 
 
 The volume of copper in an ordinary transformer is 
 
 v l = &2qn l 
 
 Or, taking v l as the standard, we have 
 
 m i 
 v = v^ 
 m 
 
A UTOTRANSFORMERS 279 
 
 Since in transformers of the same type, but different 
 sizes, the ratio of volume of iron to volume of copper is 
 
 approximately constant, the fraction * indicates the 
 
 m 
 
 quantity of material required in an autotransformer rela- 
 tively to an ordinary transformer. The ratio of material 
 saved is the reciprocal of m, and hence for large trans- 
 forming ratios the auto-principle has very little advantage, 
 whilst the necessity of tying the two circuits electrically 
 together is a distinct disadvantage. This explains why 
 autotransformers are only used for low pressure and low 
 transforming ratio. They may be used with advantage 
 as starting devices for induction motors and for reducing 
 a moderate voltage to a still smaller value. Thus with a 
 transforming ratio of 1^5, 2, or 3 the weight of an auto- 
 transformer will be only 34 per cent., 50 per cent, or 67 
 per cent, respectively of an ordinary transformer. 
 
 Metallic filament lamps for no volt can now be 
 obtained. If, then, the supply pressure is 220 volt, we 
 could use such lamps by supplying them from an auto- 
 transformer, which need as regards weight and cost only 
 be equivalent to an ordinary transformer of half the out- 
 put. This is on the supposition that all the lamps are 
 fed from the same circuit, but if we can split up the lamps 
 into two circuits, each carrying half the number, the auto- 
 transformer need only be a quarter the size of an ordinary 
 
 transformer. Generally for m circuits each carrying th 
 
 m 
 
 of the total number of lamps at i th pressure we have 
 
 m 
 
 for the weight of the autotransformer 
 
 of the weights of an ordinary transformer. Thus, if at 
 220 volt supply pressure we wish to use osmium lamps 
 of 73 volt we can divide them into three circuits and use 
 an autotransformer which will only weigh one-third as 
 much as an ordinary transformer. Or, if we wish to use 
 arc lamps requiring a pressure of about 36 volt we can 
 
280 
 
 TRANSFORMERS 
 
 group them in six circuits, and the autotransformer will 
 still be reasonably small, namely, a little less than half the 
 size of an ordinary transformer. The lamps will be quite 
 independent of each other, as if they were all in parallel 
 on one and the same circuit. 
 
 Series working. Transformers may be advantage- 
 ously used if it be required to work a number of lamps 
 in series off a circuit in which an alternatino; current of 
 
 o 
 
 constant strength is maintained. If we were to insert 
 the lamps themselves into such a circuit, the insulation 
 of the lamps to earth would have to be so perfect as to 
 withstand the full potential difference of the alternating 
 current, a condition not always easily fulfilled. If, how- 
 ever, we feed the lamps from the secondaries of series- 
 transformers, it is only necessary to provide perfect 
 
 insulation for the trans- 
 formers, which presents 
 no difficulty ; the insula- 
 tion of the lamps need 
 only be good enough for 
 the voltage required by 
 each lamp. The arrange- 
 
 a~ 
 
 /vwvwws 
 
 FIG. 145. Series working. merit is shown in Fig. 
 
 145. T, T are series- 
 transformers supplied from a constant-current alternator, 
 and L, L are the lamps. The primary return circuit is 
 not shown. Since the current in the primary is constant, 
 the current in the secondary is also approximately con- 
 stant as long as the lamp is in circuit. There is, how- 
 ever, the drawback that if a carbon should fall out of 
 a lamp, or some other accident happen whereby the 
 secondary current is interrupted, the induction in the 
 core and the E.M.F. in the secondary of that particular 
 transformer (if this is of the ordinary construction for 
 parallel work) would rise very considerably. Since the 
 primary current must, on account of the other lamps, be 
 kept constant, the pressure at the generator has, in such 
 a case, to be increased. The transformer with open 
 secondary becomes magnetically overloaded and must 
 eventually burn out. To avoid this danger we must 
 make provision to give the secondary current an alter- 
 
SERIES WORKING 281 
 
 native path in case the lamp circuit should become 
 interrupted. This may be done in two ways. We may 
 employ a kind of automatic "cut-in" as in a, or a 
 choking coil as in b. The cut-in consists of two 
 electrodes separated by a thin sheet of mica or paraffined 
 paper, which, under normal conditions, is sufficient to with- 
 stand the secondary voltage. If, however, the secondary 
 voltage rises considerably, in consequence of the lamp 
 circuit being opened, the insulation between the electrodes 
 breaks down, and the cut-in short-circuits the secondary 
 coil of the transformer. The choking coil, which may 
 be used instead of a cut-in, allows a current to pass 
 through its winding proportional to the lamp voltage, 
 but lagging by nearly 90 behind it. The power lost in 
 the choking coil is the sum of hysteresis and ohmic loss ; 
 and by a proper design of choking coil it is thus possible 
 to minimise the loss of power, although the presence of 
 choking coils must worsen the power factor. This may 
 best be seen by an example. Let us assume that the 
 lamp requires 10 ampere at 35 volt, and that its power 
 factor is 80 per cent. The power actually supplied to 
 the lamp is therefore 280 watt. Let the choking coil be 
 so constructed that it takes 5 ampere if the pressure is 
 35 volt, and that the loss of power in it is 5 watt. Its 
 
 power factor is therefore - - = 0*0285. If we now 
 
 35 x 5 
 draw a vector diagram to represent these working con- 
 
 ditions, we find that the total secondary current supplied 
 by the transformer is 13-5 ampere. We also find from 
 this diagram the power factor of the combination lamp 
 plus choking coil is only 0*6. If now the lamp current 
 is interrupted the choking coil must pass the whole 13*5 
 ampere, and the voltage must rise to 
 
 35 = 95 volt 
 
 This is an excess of 170 per cent, over the normal 
 voltage, and is accompanied by a similar rise in the 
 magnetisation of the iron core. It is of course always 
 possible to so design the choking coil that it can stand 
 
282 TRANSFORMERS 
 
 this increase of magnetic load without danger for any 
 length of time. 
 
 Sometimes it is convenient to use a transformer for 
 feeding a circuit of lamps in series, which requires a 
 nearly constant current, although the number of lamps 
 inserted may be varied. This condition is of course 
 fulfilled if the primary current is constant, but if the 
 primary voltage is constant a transformer for parallel 
 work (that is, a transformer of the usual construction 
 having as little magnetic leakage as possible) would be 
 quite unsuitable. Such a transformer keeps the secondary 
 voltage approximately constant, but not the secondary 
 current. When we have lamps in series it is the current 
 which must be kept constant, whilst the voltage must 
 vary as nearly as possible in accordance with the number 
 of lamps alight at any time. As was already shown in 
 
 FIG. 146. Constant current transformer. 
 
 Chapter IX, this condition can be met at least approxi- 
 mately by shaping the transformer in such way as to 
 produce a large magnetic leakage. A construction of 
 this kind is shown in Fig. 146. It is a core transformer 
 with primary and secondary coils on separate limbs and 
 with expansions a, b of the two yokes arranged specially 
 to produce magnetic leakage. The primary coil is joined 
 to the primary constant-pressure lead s; and the secondary 
 coil to the circuit containing the glow lamps L in series. 
 It will be obvious that with an open secondary or 
 lamp circuit the leakage field between a and b will be 
 very small, since the core of the secondary coil offers a 
 ready path for the magnetic flux. If, however, the lamp 
 circuit be closed, a current flows in the secondary coil, 
 pushing back part of the flux produced by the primary 
 coil, and the leakage field, not only between a and b but 
 all over the transformer, will be much increased. The 
 
BOOSTERS : : 
 
 larger the secondary current the more lines are pushed 
 back,, and the lower will be the secondary E.M.F. If 
 a lamp is short-circuited the current will at first increase. 
 This increase produces more magnetic leakage, and 
 lessens thus the flux which produces E.M.F. in the 
 secondary. The increase in current strength will there- 
 fore be considerably smaller than would obtain with an 
 ordinary transformer, and in this way it is possible to 
 keep the current at least approximately constant when 
 lamps are put out of action by being short-circuited. 
 For the exact determination of the working condition 
 see the vector diagram given at the end of Chapter IX. 
 Boasters. If some of the feeders between the central 
 station and the sub-stations are very long, it is some- 
 times advantageous to allow a greater voltage drop in 
 them than in the shorter feeders, and to raise the 
 
 1 
 
 147.: 
 
 pressure at the home end of these long feeders by an 
 amount corresponding to the extra drop. For this pur- 
 pose special auxiliary transformers, so-called "boosters,^ 
 may be used. This system of boosting-up the pressure 
 at the home end of long feeders has been invented 
 simultaneously and independently by Mr. Stillwell in 
 America, and by the Author in England. 1 It is shown 
 diagrammatically in Fig. 147. 
 
 C are the bus bars in the station, S is a feeder 
 supplying current to the transformer T at a sub-station. 
 Y are the distributing mains connected to this trans- 
 former. The boosting transformer has its primary 
 permanently connected to the bus bars, whilst its 
 secondary is put in series with the feeder and is sub- 
 divided into sections, so that by using a switch , a 
 greater or lesser number of secondary turns can be 
 inserted. In this manner the additional voltage put into 
 
 11 British Patent, No. 4345, March 21, 
 
284 TRANSFORMERS 
 
 the feeder at the home end may be varied from zero to 
 the full voltage given by all the secondary turns of the 
 booster. The full voltage is added when the feeder 
 carries its maximum load ; the switch is then placed on 
 its highest contact. As the load decreases the switch is 
 shifted to a lower contact, the intention being to boost 
 up by the amount corresponding to the drop in pressure 
 due to the impedance of the feeder. Since this drop is 
 proportional to the current, the adjustment of the switch 
 may be made in accordance with the readings of an 
 amperemeter in the feeder circuit, or pilot wires may 
 be brought back from the sub-station and connected to 
 a voltmeter. The switch is then adjusted so as to keep 
 the pressure indicated by the pilot voltmeter constant. 
 It is obvious that in either case the switch-lever can be 
 g worked automatically by a 
 
 ~ small electro - motor con- 
 trolled by a relay. Since, 
 in passing from one contact 
 to the other, the switch- 
 lever, if it were made in one 
 solid piece, would short- 
 circuit, and possibly burn out 
 
 FIG. 148. Booster. the section of the secondary 
 
 winding connected to the 
 two corresponding contacts, it is necessary to employ a 
 lever consisting of two parts, each smaller than the width 
 of the gap between two contacts, and having an insulating 
 partition between them. The two parts must of course 
 be joined by a suitable resistance, or preferably by a 
 choking coil. With such a construction there can occur 
 neither a short-circuit in the booster nor an interruption 
 of the feeder current. 
 
 The necessity to send the whole feeder current through 
 the switch, and the drawback of a complete interruption 
 of the feeder current if this switch should get out of 
 order, has led the Author to design the modified arrange- 
 ment of booster in which the switch is connected, not with 
 the secondary, but with the primary circuit of the auxiliary 
 transformer. This arrangement is shown in Fig. 148. 
 The feeder circuit is permanently connected with the 
 
BOOSTERS 
 
 285 
 
 bus bars through the secondary winding of the auxiliary 
 transformer, whilst the multiple contact switch is inserted 
 into its primary connection with the bus bars. The 
 primary winding is subdivided into groups a, b, c, etc. 
 According to the position of the switch-lever, more or 
 less of these groups are active, thus causing the magnetic 
 flux and the E.M.F. in the secondary to be smaller or 
 greater respectively. The first group a must of course 
 contain a sufficient number of convolutions to prevent 
 the auxiliary transformer from being magnetically over- 
 loaded. This kind of booster must therefore be larger 
 than that shown in Fig. 147, but as in any case the cost 
 of a booster is very small as compared with the saving 
 in the cost of the feeder thereby rendered possible, 
 the extra outlay is insignificant, 
 whilst the possibility of keeping 
 up the supply, even if the switch 
 should become deranged, is a 
 distinct advantage. 
 
 In a third type of boosting 
 apparatus there is no switch of 
 any kind, either in the secondary 
 or primary circuit. This type is 
 shown in Fig. 149. The con- 
 struction resembles that of a 
 two-pole dynamo with shuttle- 
 wound armature. The field is 
 built up of sheet-iron plates, and is provided with the 
 primary winding P, P, whilst the armature carries the 
 secondary winding S placed over a core of sheet-iron discs 
 in the usual manner. Both windings are permanently 
 connected, the primary with the bus bars, and the 
 secondary with bus bars and feeder as in Fig. 148. By 
 means of worm gearing, the coil S may be placed at 
 various angles with reference to the polar surfaces. If 
 the coil S is turned into a vertical position, the flux -of 
 force passing through it is a maximum, and the E.M.F. 
 generated in this coil is a maximum. If the coil be 
 placed horizontally it is ineffective, whilst in intermediate 
 positions any desired boosting effect may be obtained. 
 By turning the coil beyond its horizontal position the 
 
 FIG. 149. Booster. 
 
286 TRANSFORMERS 
 
 action may also be reversed, that is to say, we can reduce 
 the E.M.F. at the home end of the feeder. The advan- 
 tages of this type of booster are that no switches of any 
 kind are used, and that the adjustment of the boosting 
 effect is made, not by definite steps, but as gradually as 
 we please, by means of the worm gear. 
 
 A booster constructed on the same principle may 
 also be used to regulate the alternating pressure supplied 
 to a rotary connector. In these machines the ratio 
 between the alternating pressure supplied to and the 
 continuous pressure derived from the armature is con- 
 stant whatever may be the excitation, so that no adjust- 
 ment of continuous pressure can be made by means of 
 a rheostat in the exciting circuit as is done in an 
 ordinary continuous-current generator. Yet it may be 
 necessary to adjust the pressure at which the continuous 
 current is delivered. This is done by adjusting the 
 alternating pressure of the driving current, a special 
 type of booster being used for the purpose. 
 
 This booster is a three-phase transformer with mov- 
 able secondary winding ; in construction it resembles an 
 ordinary induction motor, the primary being wound on 
 the stator to produce a rotating field, whilst the secondary 
 is wound on the part which usually is the rotor, but which 
 in this case is not allowed to rotate. The arrangement 
 is shown in Fig. 150. 
 
 U is the converter with its commutator K, from 
 which the continuous current is delivered, and its slip- 
 rings s, by which it relieves the alternating three-phase 
 current. Between the slip-rings and the source of alter- 
 nating current in this case a three-phase transformer T 
 is placed the adjustable booster B. Its primary wind- 
 ings are connected to the source, and produce a magnetic 
 field of constant strength revolving round the rotor with 
 a velocity corresponding to the frequency. The winding 
 of the rotor is represented by the three coils inside the 
 inner circle. For the sake of simplicity these are shown 
 parallel, but it must be understood that they are placed 
 with an electrical angular displacement of 120 to each 
 other, so that by being successively cut by the revolving 
 primary field, the E.M.Fs. induced in them follow each 
 
BOOSTERS 
 
 287 
 
 other at intervals of a third period. The phase in rela- 
 tion to the primary at which the voltage of the second- 
 ary is injected must therefore depend on the angular 
 position at which the rotor is set, as shown by the little 
 vector diagram below the figure. In this E is the E.M.F. 
 of the source, e the E.M.F. induced in the secondary 
 coils of the booster, and E] the E.M.F. supplied to the 
 slip-rings of the converter. The position of the vector e 
 depends on the position to which the rotor is set, so that 
 E! may be made either larger or smaller than E. The 
 use of a booster of this kind alters slightly the power 
 factor, but as there are always two positions of e for each 
 
 FIG. 150. Booster applied to converter. 
 
 required value of E 1? we may choose that by which the 
 power factor is increased. 
 
 Since a considerable torque is exerted on the second- 
 ary, it is necessary to use worm gearing for setting the 
 rotor, and in large boosters it is advisable to couple two 
 mechanically together, the electrical connections being 
 made in such sense that the two torques eliminate each 
 other. The latter arrangement has been first used by 
 Messrs. Siemens, Schuckert Werke in the Paderno power 
 transmission. In this case the boosters were not used in 
 connection with converters, but simply for the purpose 
 of compensating the drop in long and heavy feeders. 
 
TRA NSFORMER S 
 
 Scott's system. An interesting application of trans- 
 formers is the conversion of a two-phase into a three- 
 phase system, and vice versa, invented by Mr. C. F. 
 Scott. 1 The arrangement is diagrammatically repre- 
 sented in Fig. 151, where G is a two-phase generator 
 supplying current to the primaries of two transformers 
 Tj and T 2 . The secondaries of these transformers are 
 joined together, as shown in the figure, leaving three 
 terminals, A, B and C, free for connection to the secondary 
 circuit. Since the primary currents in T l and T 2 have a 
 phase difference of 90, there is also the same phase 
 difference in the E.M.Fs. generated in the two secondary 
 coils. The E.M.F. between terminals A and B is there- 
 fore the resultant of two components, one being the full 
 
 /wvwwwx 
 
 FIG. 151. Scott's system. 
 
 FIG. 152. Vector diagram of 
 Scott's system. 
 
 E.M.F. generated in the secondary of T 1} and the other 
 half the E.M.F. generated in the secondary of T 2 , the 
 latter component being moreover displaced by 90 as 
 regards the former component. Let, in Fig. 152, OA be 
 the E.M.F. of T\ and OB half the E.M.F. of T 2 , then 
 BA is the resultant E.M.F. which we measure between 
 the terminals A and B. In the same manner we find 
 CA as the resultant E.M.F. produced by Tj. and the left 
 half of T 2 , whilst CB is the E.M.F. produced by both 
 halves of T 2 . It will be obvious that, by a proper choice 
 of the number of turns in the secondaries, we may so 
 
 arrange matters that OB = lAB. Then AB = BC = CA, 
 and OA = AB->/ 3 , or OA = 0-867 AB-o'86; BC. The 
 
 1 The Electrician, April 6, 1894. 
 
SCOTT S SYSTEM 
 
 winding must therefore be such that the secondary volt- 
 age of T! is 0*867 of the secondary voltage of T 2 . In 
 the clock diagram the vectors of terminal pressure pass 
 then through zero at intervals of 60, or in the same sense 
 at intervals of 120, which characterises a three-phase 
 current. We obtain thus from the terminals A,B,C a 
 three-phase current. 
 
 The advantage claimed by Mr. Scott for this system 
 is that the generation and utilisation of the current may 
 be effected by two-phase machinery, whilst the trans- 
 mission may be made in three phases. The former 
 condition he considers to be an advantage as regards the 
 independent working of motors and lamps, and especially 
 their regulation, whilst the latter condition is, of course, 
 
 1) 
 
 FIG. 153. Scott's system. 
 
 conducive to economy in copper on long lines of 
 transmissions. 
 
 A complete plant arranged according to Scott's 
 system is shown in Fig. 153. G is a two-phase generator 
 producing 100 volt, which pressure is transformed up to 
 2000 and 1730 volt in the two transformers shown. To 
 the three free terminals are joined the line wires, and 
 between each pair there is a pressure of 2000 volts. At 
 the points of consumption the three-phase current is 
 either transformed down and converted into a two-phase 
 current for working motors (A) or supplying light (B), or 
 it may be used as a three-phase current for working 
 motors (D). Although the circuits are inter-connected, 
 the regulation for constant pressure in the lamp circuits 
 causes, according to the inventor, no more difficulty 
 than if the lamps were connected directly with the 
 generator. 
 19 
 
290 TRANSFORMERS 
 
 The mechanical construction of the carcase of the 
 loo-k.v.a. transformer is shown in Figs. 216 and 217. It 
 will be noticed that the frame is constructed in the form 
 of a grid, so as to allow the cooling medium direct access 
 to the plates of core and yoke. 
 
CHAPTER XIII 
 
 THE TRANSFORMER IN RELATION TO ITS CIR- 
 CUITSEQUIVALENT COILS IN PARALLEL 
 AND SERIES CONNECTION RISE OF PRES- 
 SURE THROUGH RESONANCE DETERMINA- 
 TION OF THE DANGEROUS CONDITION RISE 
 OF PRESSURE ON LOADED LIGHTING SYS- 
 TEM IS SMALL INFLUENCE OF POWER 
 FACTOR BREAKDOWN OF CABLES IN LARGE 
 NETWORKS 
 
 The transformer in relation to its circuits. Up to the 
 present we have considered the transformer as an appar- 
 atus by itself, receiving energy from a source not in- 
 fluenced by -its presence and giving up energy to some 
 receiving device which, apart from its ability to absorb 
 energy, has no influence on the transformer. In other 
 words, we have assumed the primary current to be derived 
 from an inexhaustible source and the secondary current 
 to be given to an apparatus which can only absorb, but 
 not return energy. These conditions obtain in the 
 ordinary use of transformers. It has been shown in 
 Chapter IX that the reactance of a transformer working 
 under load is extremely small, and for this reason any 
 reactive effect of the consuming device is transmitted to 
 the source of current much in the same way as if the 
 transformer were not interposed. The transformer is 
 simply a means of linking the two circuits together and 
 adjusting the pressure, but is otherwise inert. There are, 
 however, cases when a transformer may cease to play 
 this passive role, and by reason of an interaction between 
 its inductance and the capacity of the circuit cause a rise 
 of pressure sufficient to break down itself or a cable, 
 generally the latter. Such special circumstances may 
 arise under the two extreme cases of a transformer work- 
 
 291 
 
292 TRANSFORMERS 
 
 ing either at no-load or under short circuit. In the first 
 case the reactance is large because only the equivalent 
 coils representing excitation are acting ; in the second 
 tbe reactance voltage is large because the current has 
 enormously increased. 
 
 Equivalent coils in parallel and series connection. 
 When drawing the vector diagram of a transformer 
 under load we have made use of the conception of 
 equivalent coils in parallel across the primary terminals, 
 one of these coils having such an inductance as to let 
 pass the magnetising current, the other having such 
 a resistance as to let pass a current which, multiplied by 
 the primary pressure, represents iron losses. When 
 considering the effect of capacity in the circuits it is 
 convenient to substitute for these two parallel coils, 
 two coils in series with each other, and with the capacity, 
 as was already done in Chapter IX under the sub- 
 heading "The Self-induction of a Transformer." Let 
 R and >L be resistance and reactance of the two 
 equivalent coils in parallel, and Rj and ^Lj the respective 
 equivalent values for the coils in series, then we have 
 
 R 
 
 R sin L sin 2 L sin f cos 
L and R, discussed previously 
 when introducing the conception of equivalent coils, we 
 can now substitute one coil containing wLj and Rj in 
 series, and the diagrammatic representation of a trans- 
 former having the transforming ratio i : i will be as shown 
 in Fig. 154, where coLj and Rj represent reactance and 
 
RISE OF PRESSURE THROUGH RESONANCE 293 
 
 resistance of the exciting coil and L the load which is 
 supposed to be switched off. 
 
 Let B represent the bus bars at the station, and let 
 the transformer be joined to them by a concentric cable. 
 As long as both conductors remain connected to the bus 
 bars the pressure at the terminals of the transformer 
 cannot rise above the station voltage, but if the switch to 
 the outer combustion has opened the cable as well as the 
 transformer may, under certain circumstances, be subjected 
 to an excessive pressure due to exact or approximate 
 resonance between the inductance L x and the capacity of 
 the outer conductor to earth. This capacity is indicated 
 in the diagram by C, whilst the capacity of all the outer 
 conductors of other cables in the network fed from the 
 same bus bars is indicated by C . On opening the switch 
 s the circuit remaining is as follows : From the upper bus 
 
 Gable 
 
 nWWP-AAAAOi 
 coLi Hi 
 
 
 %%M%Z%Zf^ 
 
 Earth 
 
 FIG. 154. Rise of pressure through resonance. 
 
 bar through the inner conductor to the equivalent coil 
 wLjRj, then to the outer conductor, from there through 
 C to earth and finally through C to the other bus bar. 
 We have thus two capacities and an inductance in series. 
 The two capacities in series are equivalent to a single 
 capacity c of the value 
 
 Now in a large distributing system the aggregate 
 capacity, C , of all the feeders and network connected with 
 them is enormously greater than the capacity of the 
 single feeder to the transformer under consideration, so 
 that we can write c = C, and we have thus a circuit as 
 shown in Fig. 155, whose natural frequency is 
 
 i i ooo / _ \ 
 
 \~-- ..... (53) 
 
 27T 
 
Ki 
 
 294 TRANSFORMERS 
 
 where Lj is given in Henry and C in microfarad. If 
 v l happens to be not very different from the frequency at 
 the bus bars we have approximate, if it happens to be 
 equal to this frequency we have exact, resonance, and the 
 current flowing through the circuit will be nearly or 
 exactly given by 
 
 the resistance of the cable being neglected because it is 
 very small as compared to R T . 
 
 This current is larger than the normal magnetising 
 current and produces a terminal pressure also larger than 
 the normal. How much larger will depend on the 
 relation between wLj and Rj. In a transformer having 
 
 little iron loss, but a large 
 magnetising current, that 
 is to say a low power factor 
 at no load, the excess pres- 
 sure thus produced by 
 approximate or complete 
 
 FIG. ^.-Resonating circuit. resonance may be several 
 
 times the normal working 
 
 pressure, and may cause a breakdown in the cable either 
 between the two conductors or between the outer 
 conductor and earth. 
 
 Determination of the dangerous condition. An 
 example will make the foregoing clear. Let the primary 
 feeders and networks of an electricity works have a total 
 length of 100 km. (63 miles), and let there be one feeder 
 leading to an isolated transformer. Assume a bus voltage 
 of 3000 and a frequency of 45. If concentric cables are 
 used, the capacity of outer conductor to earth will vary 
 according to the size of cable between 07 and 1*5 micro- 
 farad per km. Let in our case the capacity be i 
 microfarad per km. and let the cable feed a 2O-kw. trans- 
 former, which has i J per cent, or 300 watt iron loss, and 
 let the magnetising component of the no-load current be 
 3 per cent., or 0*196 ampere. The reactance of the 
 magnetising coil will then be 3000 : 0*196= 15,300 ohm, 
 and the resistance of the parallel coil representing iron 
 
DANGEROUS CONDITION 295 
 
 losses will be 3000 : o* i = 30,000 ohm. For the equivalent 
 series arrangement we find from (50) and (51) 
 
 )L!= 1 2 100 ohm 
 1^ = 6200 ohm 
 Lj = 43 Henry 
 
 We have then a circuit consisting of a capacity C, a 
 resistance of 6200 ohm, and an inductance of 43 Henry, 
 all in series. It should be noted that Rj has no physical 
 existence ; it is a fictitious resistance corresponding to 
 the iron loss at normal excitation, that is to a no-load 
 
 current of ^/O'ig6 2 + O'i 2 = o'22 ampere. This current 
 will flow if on the terminals of the transformer 3000 volt 
 is impressed. To produce this E.M.F. the pressure on 
 the bus bars must be 
 
 where C is given in farad. For a certain value of C 
 (in our case about 0*3 microfarad), there will be reson- 
 ance, and the term in brackets will become zero, so that 
 a bus-bar voltage of o'22R 1 =1360 volt will suffice to 
 produce the full voltage on the transformer. Since the 
 bus-bar voltage is not 1360 but 3000, it will be obvious 
 that there must be a rise of terminal voltage on the 
 transformer. The question is, how large a rise? It 
 would not be correct to assume that the rise will be 
 simply in proportion of 1360 to 3000. This would be 
 the case if R! were a physical resistance, but as it is 
 only a fictitious resistance to represent iron loss, and as 
 the latter varies with the no-load current, it is obvious 
 that R! cannot be a constant. The problem is as follows : 
 Given a constant bus-bar voltage and a transformer of 
 known iron, find for various values of the capacity 
 between the outer conductor of cable and earth the 
 pressures between inner and outer conductor, and also 
 between outer conductor and earth. 
 
 The solution is as follows : From the known quality 
 of the iron calculate the iron loss P as a function of the 
 terminal pressure, and plot this as shown by the dotted 
 
2 9 6 
 
 TRANSFORMERS 
 
 curve in Fig. 156. Plot in the same diagram, also as 
 functions of the terminal pressure, the total no-load 
 current i and its two components, i^ and i h . The copper 
 loss, being exceedingly small, need not be taken into 
 account. Now assume any terminal voltage, larger than 
 3000, say, for instance, 3500, and draw its vector in 
 Fig. 157 to an arbitrary volt scale. Let this be OA. 
 From Fig. 156 we find the corresponding magnetising 
 
 2000/ 
 
 1-0 
 0-9 
 0-8 
 0-7 
 0-6 
 
 gO-5 
 * 
 
 | 04 
 o 
 
 0-3 
 
 i 
 
 0-2 
 0-1 
 
 Terminal Pressure. in 
 
 P/ 
 
 1000 
 
 0123456789 
 
 FIG. 156. Characteristic curves of transformer. 
 
 current ^ = 0*23, and the current corresponding to the 
 iron loss / A = o'ii. Let OB and BC be the vectors of 
 these two components drawn to an arbitrary ampere 
 scale, then z* = OC is the resultant or no-load current. 
 Since this current is charging the condenser the terminal 
 E.M.F. of the latter must be at right angles to it. Draw 
 then from A the line AD at right angles to OC, and 
 determine its points of intersection with a circle, the 
 radius of which represents on the volt scale the pressure 
 
DANGEROUS CONDITION 
 
 297 
 
 at the bus bars, namely, 3000 volt, 
 voltage e can then be scaled off on 
 the line AD. It is either of the 
 two values 
 
 AE = 5700 
 
 The condenser 
 
 No other value is possible at 
 the assumed terminal voltage of 
 3500. But in order that either 
 voltage may obtain the capacity C 
 must have a definite value, which 
 is found from 
 
 /o = >*Cio- . . (54) 
 C being given in microfarad. The 
 capacity is 
 
 for e= 575 . . C = i'6 
 
 ,, = 5700 . . C = o'i6i 
 
 By repeating the construction here explained for 
 other values of terminal voltage we find other values 
 for e and C, and we are thus able to plot the relation 
 
 I $7' Determination of 
 dangerous capacity. 
 
 0-5 1-0 1-5 
 
 FIG. 158. Voltage due to resonance in an unloaded system. 
 
 between capacity to earth of outer conductor (or what 
 comes to the same thing), length of feeder and cor- 
 responding pressures between the two conductors and 
 
298 TRANSFORMERS 
 
 between outer conductor and earth, as shown in 
 Fig. 158. In this figure the curve I gives the terminal 
 pressure on the transformer, which is, of course, equal 
 to the pressure between the two conductors of the 
 cable, and the lower curve 1 1 gives the terminal pressure 
 between the outer conductor and the lead sheath, that is, 
 earth. As will be seen, both pressures exceed 8000 
 volt if the capacity is 0*25 microfarad, which cor- 
 responds to a length of feeder of a quarter kilometer. 
 With a longer or a shorter feeder the excess of pressure 
 will be less than 5000 volt. We may thus consider 
 250 m. a dangerous length of feeder. For the insulation 
 between the two conductors the danger is not very great. 
 A 3OOO-volt cable will probably stand 8000 volt also, 
 but the outer conductor is not very heavily insulated 
 against the lead sheath, and for this light insulation 
 8000 volt is indeed a dangerous pressure, which in all 
 probability will produce a breakdown. All danger can, 
 however, be avoided if the switch gear is either so con- 
 structed that the inner conductor must be switched out 
 first, and the outer conductor must be switched in first, or 
 if only solid connections without any switches or fuses are 
 used for the outer conductors. 
 
 In exemplifying the rise of pressure by resonance 
 for a definite case, I have assumed that concentric cables 
 are used, as this is the usual practice in single-phase 
 working, but the same argument also applies to stranded 
 cables for either single or multiphase working. In such 
 cases the "dangerous length of feeder" is by reason of 
 the smaller capacity much greater, and as all the con- 
 ductors are equally well insulated the danger for each 
 is no greater than that for the inner conductor in the 
 case of a concentric cable. On the other hand, the 
 simple remedy of omitting all switches and fuses in one 
 of the conductors is no longer available, as it would 
 increase the danger for the others and displace the 
 electrical centre of the system. The remedy is, however, 
 simple enough ; it consists in arranging the switch gear 
 so that all the conductors of one feeder are switched on 
 and off together. 
 
 Rise of pressure on a loaded lighting system is small. It 
 
PRESSURE ON LOADED LIGHTING SYSTEM 299 
 
 may be objected that this arrangement can only refer to 
 intentional switching, whilst the accidental blowing of a 
 fuse through overload may inter- 
 rupt one conductor and thus estab- 
 lish a dangerous condition. This 
 objection is not valid, because if 
 there be a load the rise of pressure 
 can only be very small. This 
 will be seen from Fig. 159, which 
 is plotted for the same transformer 
 as Fig. 158, but on the supposition 
 that the transformer has a load of 
 10 per cent, of its normal, and 
 that the power factor of the load 
 is 90 per cent. If the load were 
 non-inductive the rise of pressure 
 would be almost imperceptible, 
 but even at 90 per cent, power 
 factor it is quite moderate, and 
 the dangerous length of feeder is 
 now 600 m. For a feeder made 
 of stranded (instead of concentric) 
 conductors it would be 3 km. or 
 more and perfectly harmless. 
 
 Influence of power factor. I n 
 the case represented by Fig. 159 
 the slight rise of pressure is mainly 
 due to the fact that the power 
 factor of the load is only 0*9 instead 
 of unity, and the conclusion seems 
 plausible that a lower power factor 
 would result in a bigger rise of 
 pressure. This is indeed the case. 
 Let the transformer of the previous 
 example have an inductive drop of 
 4 per cent, and a copper loss of^ 
 ij per cent., and let it be used to > 
 supply current to an induction FIG. 159. Rise of pressure on 
 
 Jri J ! r loaded system. 
 
 motor whose power factor at 
 
 starting at a pressure corresponding with 3000 volt on 
 
 the primary of a "perfect" transformer is 30 per cent. 
 
300 
 
 TRANSFORMERS 
 
 with a starting current of 15 ampere in the primary. A 
 simple calculation, which need not be repeated here, 
 shows that the combination of motor and transformer 
 can be replaced by an equivalent coil of 79 ohm. resist- 
 ance and 230 ohm. reactance, or 244 ohm. impedance, 
 giving a starting current on the primary side of 12*3 
 ampere. Assume now that with this current one of the 
 fuses at the home end of the feeder happens to blow ; we 
 shall then have again a circuit as shown in Fig. 155, 
 only that now reactance and resistance are much smaller, 
 
 Volt 
 10,000 
 
 9000 
 8000 
 7000 
 6000 
 5000 
 4000 
 3000 
 2000 
 1000 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 s^ 
 
 s* 
 
 V 
 
 ^ 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 / 
 
 / 
 
 
 
 
 \ 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 / 
 
 
 1 
 
 
 
 \ 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 / 
 
 1 
 
 
 
 
 
 \ 
 
 \ 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 / 
 
 
 \j 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 \ 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 1 
 
 1 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 S 
 
 
 
 s 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 / 
 
 
 / 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 v 
 
 
 
 X 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 / 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 \ 
 
 
 
 
 X 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 / 
 
 
 I 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 \ 
 
 
 
 
 X 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 / 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 \ 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 X. 
 
 ,., 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 / 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 s 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 >-. 
 
 -^ 
 
 ^___ 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 / 
 
 
 
 1 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 < 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 *-** 
 
 ***. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 / 
 
 
 
 t 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 ^ 
 
 X 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 , 
 
 / 
 
 
 
 
 / 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 X 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 - 
 
 ^ 
 
 
 
 
 
 / 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 X 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 / 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 \ 
 
 ^^ 
 
 
 
 
 I~ 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 / 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 * 
 
 ~->~ 
 
 1 
 
 
 
 
 
 / 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 / 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 / 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 ^x 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Capa, 
 
 citj 
 
 in 
 
 M 
 
 F. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 5 10 15 20 25 30 
 
 FIG. 160. Voltage due to resonance in a loaded system. 
 
 requiring a greater charging current, and therefore a 
 greater capacity that is to say, a greater length of feeder 
 to produce a dangerous condition. In this case it is not 
 the inductance of the transformer, but that of the receiving 
 apparatus which produces the rise of pressure. The 
 transformer may, however, break down in consequence. 
 The graphic treatment of this case is the same as 
 that already explained in the case of an unloaded 
 transformer, and need not be set out in detail. The 
 result is given in Fig. 160, which shows that with a 
 capacity of about 13 microfarad the pressure on the 
 transformer terminals, and therefore between the two 
 
BREAKDOWN OF CABLES 
 
 301 
 
 conductors of the cable, as well as the pressure between 
 the disconnected conductor and earth, will be about 
 10,000 volt. The pressure on the terminals of the 
 transformer is represented by the curve I, and that 
 of the outer conductor to earth is represented by the 
 curve II. 
 
 Breakdown of cables in large networks. It is a 
 common experience that if a " dead earth " occurs at 
 some place in a high-pressure network, and even if 
 the faulty place is promptly isolated by the fuses 
 blowing, the insulation of the cables in some other part 
 
 Earth 
 
 FIG. 161. Illustrating break-down in large network. 
 
 of the network breaks down. This is also due to the 
 interaction of inductance and capacity. Let in Fig. 161 
 I be the inner and O the outer conductor leading from 
 the central station to a sub-station where a transformer 
 P, S supplies current to the secondary network. Ii d are 
 primary, and I 2 , O 2 secondary cables joining this sub- 
 station to others, which, in their turn, also receive 
 primary current from the central station, the arrangement 
 being that commonly in use of a complete secondary and 
 a complete primary network, the two interlinked by 
 transformers, and the primary network fed at many 
 points by high-pressure feeders. Let all the cables be 
 
302 TRANSFORMERS 
 
 concentric, and the outer conductors neither fused nor 
 provided with switches. Owing to the great capacity of 
 the outer conductors to earth, the potential to earth of 
 d, as well as that of O 2 , will be very nearly zero, and 
 that of Ii to earth will be very nearly equal to the bus- 
 bar voltage, and that of 1 2 to the lamp voltage. A short- 
 circuit to earth on the outer conductor is therefore 
 unlikely, and, if it should nevertheless happen, inocuous, 
 but a short-circuit to earth of any part of the inner con- 
 ductor will result in a heavy current and blowing of the 
 nearest fuses. Let, for instance, a " dead earth " be 
 developed by some failure of insulation at point E, and 
 fusing together of the inner conductor with a metal part 
 well earthed, say the case of the transformer, then the 
 fuses f,fi, and/2 will promptly blow, but the current going 
 to earth will not be interrupted thereby, for P receives 
 E.M.F. by induction from S from the other sub-stations, 
 and it is only after the fuse f* has also blown that the 
 earth-current ceases. But/s, being in the secondary, is 
 necessarily a heavy fuse, and requires some time to come 
 into action. During that time there exists a dangerous 
 condition, for we have now the inductance of the trans- 
 former due to its magnetic leakage in series with the 
 capacity of O and d to lead sheath, that is to say, the 
 capacity of the whole of the network to earth. This capacity 
 in a larger system may be enormous, perhaps 100 micro- 
 farad or more. The charging current will now flow from E 
 (equivalent to the lead sheaths of all the primary cables) 
 through P to the totality of the outer conductors. Let 
 C be the capacity to lead of all the outer conductors, 
 then we have again a circuit as represented by Fig. 155, 
 but with this difference, that E is now given, not by the 
 bus bars, but by the primary of the transformer, and the 
 equivalent coils to Li and Ri represent now the effect of 
 magnetic leakage and true copper resistance. The 
 inductance and capacity being in series, there will be a 
 rise of pressure, but whether this will be a dangerous 
 rise will depend on the electrical constants of the trans- 
 former and network. In the first place it should be noted 
 that E is smaller than the bus-bar voltage, the reduction 
 depending on the resistance of those cables which bring 
 
BREAKDOWN OF CABLES 
 
 303 
 
 the current from the neighbouring sub-stations. If the 
 capacity be very large and the transformer very small, 
 the latter is almost in the condition of short-circuit. It 
 may be burned up, but no great rise of pressure will be 
 produced on the cables, so that no breakdown of the 
 cables is likely to occur. Again, if the transformer is 
 very large, the charging current which the cables can 
 take will be insufficient to produce any considerable 
 E.M.F. of self-induction, and also in this case there is no 
 danger. Between these two extreme cases there may, 
 
 Volt 
 10,000 
 
 5000 
 
 10 20 30 40 
 
 FIG. 162. Rise of pressure in large network. 
 
 50K.V.A, 
 
 however, be others where the inductance due to 
 magnetic leakage and the capacity of the network are in 
 such proportion to produce perfect or approximate 
 resonance, and then the pressure of the outer conductors 
 to earth may rise sufficiently to break down the insula- 
 tion in one or more places. 
 
 After what has been already explained, the reader 
 will have no difficulty in determining for any given net- 
 work this dangerous size of transformers. As an example 
 I take a network of 100 km. having a capacity to earth of 
 100 microfarad and transformers with \\ per cent, ohmic 
 
304 TRANSFORMERS 
 
 and 4 per cent, inductive drop. The resistance of the second- 
 ary network is such that at full load the ohmic drop between 
 a sub-station and a consumer midway between two sub- 
 stations is 1 1- per cent. The frequency is 4.5, and the working 
 pressure 3000 volt as before. On making the calcula- 
 tion for various sizes of transformers, we find that one of 
 about 10 k.v.a. will produce a pressure of about 8000 
 volt, both on its own terminals and between the outer 
 conductor and earth. With smaller and larger trans- 
 formers the pressures are less. Fig. 162 shows the 
 relation between capacity of transformer and pressure 
 for this particular case. Curve I shows the pressure on 
 the terminals of the transformer itself, and curve II 
 shows the pressure between the outer conductor and 
 earth. Taking a rise of pressure up to 3000 volt on the 
 outer conductor of the concentric cables as just on the 
 verge of danger, we see that transformers below 7 k.v.a., 
 and above 22 k.v.a. may be used, but not transformers 
 between these two limits. This is with concentric cables. 
 With stranded cables the capacity of a loo-km. network 
 would be barely 20 microfarad, and then even a lo-kw. 
 transformer would already be outside of the danger limit. 
 
CHAPTER XIV 
 
 SOME EXAMPLES OF MODERN TRANSFORMERS 
 
 THE practical development of any new piece of machinery 
 or apparatus is generally a matter of trial and error. 
 At first, whilst the scientific principles underlying the 
 new application of natural laws are but imperfectly 
 understood, we have a period during which inventors, 
 groping more or less in the dark, seek success in 
 abnormal designs or the special development of some 
 detail which later on is seen to be of minor importance ; 
 then comes a period where the really essential details are 
 recognised and receive consideration, and as these are 
 perfected we get to the final stage, characterised not by 
 divergence, but rather by uniformity of design. The first 
 period in the development of the transformer has not 
 been dealt with in this book. To the technical historian 
 it may be interesting to investigate the early designs of 
 Goulard and Gibbs, Lane Fox, Rankin Kennedy and 
 other pioneers, but such investigations will not help one 
 to either understand the working of a transformer or to 
 design one. The second stage, namely the conscious 
 improvement of details, has been treated in the previous 
 pages, and it now only remains to give the reader a 
 general survey of the last stage by placing before him a 
 few examples of the best modern practice. 
 
 The Brush Electrical Engineering Co., Ltd. Figs. 
 163 to 165 show a loo-k.v.a. single-phase oil-cooled 
 transformer, and Figs. 166 to 168 a 5<3'5 
 
 Length . . 465 ni. 
 Weight . . 645 kg. 
 
EXAMPLES OF MODERN TRANSFORMERS 311 
 
 The current density in both windings is 2*55 ampere per 
 sq. mm. The induction is 13,600, and the total flux 
 20*6 megalines. The carcase weighs 7 tons, and the 
 calculated iron loss with alloyed plates is 21 kw. The 
 iron loss is therefore only 0*6 per cent, of the output. 
 The calculated copper loss is 10*35 kw. in the three 
 primary and 9' 15 kw. in the three secondary coils. The 
 total losses at full load are 40*5 kw., or 1*14 per cent, of 
 the full- load output. This makes the efficiency at full 
 load nearly 99 per cent. The insulation has been 
 tested with 50,000 volt for the high-pressure, and 6000 
 volt for the low-pressure coils to earth during fifteen 
 minutes. 
 
 Messrs. Ferranti, Ltd. An air-cooled core type 
 transformer for moderate power is represented in Figs. 
 172 to 174. The core is of rectangular section, with the 
 end plates stepped so as to more nearly fill the rounded 
 space within the coils. Core and yoke are bolted up 
 with strong gun-metal flanking plates, those of the lower 
 yoke being provided with flanges for attachment to the 
 cast-iron base. For outside protection a non-perforated 
 steel shell is used, and ventilation is provided by holes in 
 the baseband cap as shown in Fig. 172. For a primary 
 pressure of 2000 volt at 50 frequency and a trans- 
 forming ratio of about 10 : i the dimensions are as 
 follows 
 
 Output, 
 k.v.a. 
 
 A 
 
 B 
 
 C 
 
 D 
 
 E 
 
 F 
 
 30 
 
 3' 2" 
 
 i' 3" 
 
 10" 
 
 2' 10" 
 
 i' 7" 
 
 2' o" 
 
 50 
 
 3' 4" 
 
 i' 3" 
 
 10" 
 
 2' I 4" 
 
 ,' 9" 
 
 2' o" 
 
 Fig. 175 shows the rise of temperature of the 30- 
 k.v.a. size, and Fig. 176 that of the 5O-k.v.a. size at 
 full load, whilst Figs. 177 and 178 represent the regula- 
 tion. In each diagram two curves are shown, the 
 ordinates representing percentage drop at the secondary 
 terminals as a function of the power factor in the 
 
i_ 
 
 fe 
 
EXAMPLES OF MODERN TRANSFORMERS 313 
 
 secondary circuit, but with this difference, that the lower 
 curve refers to constant current and the upper to con- 
 
 Room Temperatur > 
 
 10.0 11.0 12.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 
 Time in Hours 
 
 FIG. 175. Heating curve of Ferranti 3o-k.v.a. transformer. 
 
 stant power. In the latter case the current must 
 increase with decreasing power factor, which accounts 
 for the greater drop. 
 
 35 
 
 Room 
 
 Temperature 
 
 9.0 10.0 11.0 12.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8-0 
 Time in Hours 
 
 FIG. 176. Heating curve of Ferranti 5O-k.v.a. transformer. 
 
 Fig. 179 shows the general design of single-phase 
 oil-cooled transformers for small and moderate out- 
 
TRANSFORMERS 
 
 put. The transformers may be either placed on a level 
 floor or attached to a wall, for which purpose the case 
 
 1-0 0-95 0-9 0-85 0-8 0-75 
 
 FIG. 177. Regulation curve of Ferranti 3O-k.v.a. transformer. 
 
 is provided with lugs. The dimensions A to E in 
 inches, and the weight in cwt. are given in the following- 
 table. 
 
 The efficiency at full non-inductive load ranges from 
 
 1-0 0-95 0-9 0-85 0'8 0-75 
 
 > cos if 
 
 FIG. 178. Regulation curve of Ferranti 5o-k.v. a. transformer. 
 
 91*2 per cent, in the ^-k.v.a-. size to 97*9 per cent, in 
 the 5o-k.v.a. size; at quarter load from 777 to 97*1 
 per cent. 
 
EXAMPLES OF MODERN TRANSFORMERS 315 
 
 K.v.a. 
 
 A 
 
 B 
 
 C 
 
 D 
 
 E 
 
 Weight 
 
 * 
 
 Mi 
 
 IO 
 
 Si 
 
 ;i 
 
 15 
 
 I 
 
 I 
 
 i6f 
 
 "1 
 
 10 
 
 4 
 
 I/ 
 
 i 
 
 2 
 
 i6| 
 
 "I 
 
 IO 
 
 si 
 
 17 
 
 2 
 
 5 
 
 20| 
 
 *5* 
 
 "I 
 
 1 1 
 
 * 
 
 3t 
 
 10 
 
 '25 
 
 18 
 
 i5i 
 
 H 
 
 30 
 
 7i 
 
 i5 
 
 25 
 
 18 
 
 5t 
 
 H 
 
 32 
 
 8* 
 
 20 
 
 25f 
 
 i8f 
 
 '6| 
 
 1 4! 
 
 35 
 
 * 
 
 25 
 
 27 
 
 20f 
 
 i7f 
 
 is! 
 
 36 
 
 M 
 
 30 
 
 29i 
 
 22 i 
 
 i9| 
 
 17 
 
 36 
 
 16 
 
 40 
 
 32 
 
 23i 
 
 22 J- 
 
 i9| 
 
 39 
 
 i7i 
 
 50 
 
 34 
 
 25i 
 
 24 
 
 21 
 
 39 
 
 20 
 
 For the transformers here described iron and copper 
 losses are as under 
 
 Output k v a 
 
 c 
 
 3O 
 
 ^O 
 
 I 2O 
 
 
 J 
 
 o^ 
 
 j v 
 
 
 Iron loss, watt .... 
 
 I 12 
 
 290 
 
 350 
 
 1670 
 
 Copper loss, watt . . . 
 
 131 
 
 400. 
 
 760 
 
 H85 
 
 The copper loss is given at full secondary current, 
 corresponding to the volt-ampere at which the trans- 
 former is rated, and after it has been at work sufficiently 
 long to have reached its final temperature. 
 
TRANSFORMERS 
 
 MFiG. 179. Ferranti standard type 
 I oil-cooled transformer. 
 
 Fig. 1 80 shows the design of a small transformer for 
 a very high primary pressure. To secure good insula- 
 tion the primary circuit is arranged in 8 distinct coils, 
 which may be more easily handled and tested before 
 being assembled. In the present case the transformers 
 are intended for three-phase io,ooo-volt circuits. 
 
 The dimensions for a 50- and 3O-kw. transformer, the 
 output being obtained at a power factor of 075, are as 
 follows 
 
 Kw. 
 
 A 
 
 B 
 
 C 
 
 50 
 
 4 'o" 
 
 2' 7i" 
 
 2' IOJt" 
 
 30 
 
 3' 4" 
 
 2' 4" 
 
 I' 10" 
 
EXAMPLES OF MODERN TRANSFORMERS 317 
 
 In star coupling each primary takes 5800 volt, or 
 725 volt on each individual coil. To protect the low- 
 pressure circuit an earthing shield is used. 
 
 A three-phase transformer, where the three phases 
 are combined in one apparatus, is shown in Figs. 181 and 
 182. It is a i2O-kw. transformer, star coupled for 5000 
 volt primary line pressure, and a secondary pressure, 
 which may be adjusted to either 370, 380, or 390 volt. 
 For this purpose tappings are taken on the secondary, and 
 by means of a three-pole switch the number of turns on 
 each limb may be changed from the normal of 49 to either 
 48 for the lower or 50 for the higher voltage. This is 
 shown diagrammatically in Fig. 183. The switch is seen 
 in Figs. 181 and 182 mounted on the top of the casing. 
 
 The core area is 350 sq. cm., the flux 4*45 megalines, 
 and the induction 12,700. The following table gives the 
 winding data 
 
 i2o-kw. Transformer 
 
 Primary 
 
 Secondary 
 
 Connection. 
 
 Star 
 
 Star 
 
 Line voltage . 
 
 5000 
 
 380 
 
 Number of coils . . 
 
 12 
 
 3 
 
 Wire, bare, mm. . . 
 
 4'30X2-55 
 
 1 2 '6 x 2-54, four in 
 parallel 
 
 Wire, covered, mm. . 
 
 4-8 x 3-05 
 
 13-2x3-05 
 
 Number of turns per 
 limb 
 
 6 3 6 
 
 50 
 
 Number of layers 
 
 5 
 
 i 
 
 Tappings .... 
 
 none 
 
 370 volt on 48th turn 
 380 volt on 49th turn 
 390 volt on 5Oth turn 
 
 INS.1Z 9 6 3 
 
 3 FT. 
 
 FIG. 1 8 1. I20-kw. 5000 to 380 volt 4O-frequency three-phas 
 made by Messrs. Ferranti, Ltd. 
 
 e transformer 
 
320 
 
 TRANSFORMERS 
 
 SECONDARY TERMINALS 
 
 NEUTRAL 
 
 PRIMARY TERMINALS 
 
 FIG. 183. Diagram 
 
 of connections to 
 
 Fig. 181. 
 
 FIG. 182. End elevation to Fig. 181. 
 
EXAMPLES OF MODERN TRANSFORMERS 321 
 
 r 
 
 FIG. 184. 5oo-k.v.a. 3 1200/2200- volt transformer made by the Bullock El. Mfg. Co. 
 
 The B^illock Electric Manufacturing Co. Figs. 1 84 to 
 188 are good examples of high-class American practice in 
 
 21 
 
322 TRANSFORMERS 
 
 the design of transformers. Figs. 1 84 and 185 show a 500 
 k.v.a. oil-cooled shell-type transformer for 60 frequency 
 
 FIG. 185. 500-k.v.a. 3 1200/2200- volt transformer made by the Bullock 
 Electrical Manufacturing Co. 
 
 taking current at 31,200 volt, and delivering current at 
 2200 volt. On account of the high voltage, special 
 precaution has been taken to separate the coils by 
 
EXAMPLES OF MODERN TRANSFORMERS 323 
 
 insulating partitions, shown by thick lines, and the 
 terminals are also immersed in oil. The secondary 
 winding is in two groups, so that the same type may be 
 
 ,EP. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 X? 
 
 g 
 
 -LP. Coil 
 
 -'Case 
 ater Outlet 
 
 Air 
 ater Inlet 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 ^ 
 
 ^ 
 
 ==: 
 
 
 ! 
 
 - .." 
 
 ===^ 
 
 
 
 
 =^ 
 
 ^ 
 
 W 
 
 
 
 
 
 / 
 
 
 // 
 
 \ 
 
 
 ^ 
 
 ^ 
 
 ^-^ 
 
 . 
 
 
 _/ 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 / 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 X 
 
 
 
 
 
 5C 
 
 OK 
 
 w. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 /I 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 / 
 
 _ 
 
 __ 
 
 _^ - - 
 
 _ 
 
 ^^=- 
 
 =rT 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 . 
 
 
 
 
 <- 
 
 
 
 
 
 ^ =5 * fc -* 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 j 
 
 
 |! 
 
 <~ 112% Load -> 
 
 1 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 
 Hours Run 
 <- - 101% Load ----- ^j* 147%->j 
 Load 
 
 FIG. 186. Heating curves of 5oo-k.v. a. transformer. 
 
 coupled up for half the secondary pressure and double 
 current. The transformer is one of a group of three for 
 
 Load 
 
 FiG. 187. 500-k.v.a. 3 1 200/2200- volt transformer. 
 
 three-phase work, as is the usual practice in America, in 
 preference to building one three-phase transformer of 
 treble output. The use of three single transformers in 
 
324 
 
 TRANSFORMERS 
 
 mesh connection has the advantage that a failure of one 
 transformer need not interrupt the three-phase service ; 
 the other two remaining at work are simply overloaded, 
 so as to do the work of three ; but as the time-constant of 
 large transformers is very great, no damage is done to 
 the overloaded transformers during the time required to 
 bring a spare transformer into service. This advantage 
 is, of course, lost if star coupling is adopted. The trans- 
 former here illustrated is, however, sufficiently well insu- 
 lated to be used in star-connection, when the line pressure 
 on the primary side is 54,000 volt. The oil is cooled by 
 
 FIG. 1 88. Plan to Fig. 189. 
 
 a cold-water worm placed in the upper part of the case, 
 and the terminals are brought through the cover by large 
 porcelain ferrules. The total weight of copper is 300 kg. 
 In Fig. 1 86 a heating test of this transformer is 
 recorded. To shorten the time, the test was started with 
 a 1 2 per cent, overload, and then the run was continued 
 with about full load. The final temperature-rise at 
 normal full load is 38 C. for the coils, and 35 C. for the 
 carcase (marked " case " in the diagram). The great 
 difference of temperature between water inlet and water 
 outlet should be noted, as also the small difference 
 between the temperature of the carcase and the out- 
 
EXAMPLES OF MODERN TRANSFORMERS 325 
 
 flowing water. This indicates a very vigorous circulation 
 of the oil and efficient action of the worm. 
 
 r~ 
 
 Fig. 187 shows the performance of this transformer 
 as regards efficiency and regulation. 
 
 A small transformer of the type frequently used in 
 
326 
 
 TRANSFORMERS 
 
 America for private houses is shown in Figs. 188 to 190, 
 The secondary circuit is arranged in two groups, and 
 there are four secondary leads brought out of the case, 
 so that not only can the same type be used for full and 
 half voltage, but, by grouping the two windings in series 
 and joining the connecting joint to the neutral bar of the 
 distributing switchboard, a supply on the three-wire 
 system may be given. The dimensions refer to a 5-k.v.a. 
 transformer at 60 frequency for the voltage usual in a 
 house-to-house system of supply, namely, 1000 to 2000 
 volt on the primary and not over 200 volt on the 
 secondary. 
 
 The British Westinghouse Co., Ltd. Before entering 
 on a description of the various designs, it will be useful 
 to say a few words concerning the principles on which 
 this firm has standardised its transformers. Although 
 high efficiency is always desirable, there are cases where 
 it is especially important. Thus in a lighting transformer 
 high efficiency at low loads is far more important than 
 in a power transformer, because the latter is not worked 
 for a very long time at light load, and power current is, 
 as a rule, cheaper than lighting current. On the other 
 hand, capital outlay for the very reason that power 
 current must be supplied cheaply, is an important matter 
 in power supply undertakings, and for these reasons it 
 may be good policy to sacrifice a little in efficiency if 
 thereby the fixed charges can be reduced. To satisfy 
 the various conditions of working the British Westing- 
 house standardise two types, one for high, the other for 
 medium efficiencies. 
 
 The relation between these may be seen from the 
 following table, which refers to the two types of 4O-k.v.a. 
 transformer 
 
 Percentage of load . . 
 
 IOO 
 
 75 
 
 50 
 
 25 
 
 High Efficiency 
 
 97-80 
 
 9777 
 
 97'53 
 
 96-15 
 
 Medium Efficiency 
 
 97*50 
 
 97-40 
 
 96-80 
 
 9475 
 
EXAMPLES OF MODERN TRANSFORMERS 327 
 
 The high-efficiency transformer is, of course, more 
 costly and also heavier. In the 4o-k.v.a. size the 
 complete weight with tank and oil is 660 kg. for the 
 high-efficiency transformer, and 540 kg. for the medium- 
 efficiency transformer. 
 
 FIG. 191. FIG. 192. 
 
 4O-k.v.a. 2ooo/2OO-volt transformer made by the British Westinghouse Co., Ltd. 
 
 Another matter which requires attention when 
 standardising a line of transformers is the question of 
 heating. An actual working temperature up to 85 C. 
 may be permitted, but a knowledge of this limit alone 
 is not sufficient to determine the cooling surfaces ; we 
 must also know the temperature of the room in which 
 the transformer will have to work and the character 
 of the load and the cooling conditions. 
 
328 TRANSFORMERS 
 
 In large transformers this information is generally 
 available beforehand, and the designer can make his 
 calculations accordingly. Small transformers must, how- 
 ever, be made in quantities for stock, and the designer 
 cannot know in what localities and under what conditions 
 they will have to work. He must therefore design the 
 small transformer for a lesser temperature rise than might 
 be allowed in a medium-size transformer. If he designs 
 
 o 
 
 a large transformer with water-cooling he can calculate 
 still more closely, that is to say, allow a greater tempera- 
 ture rise, because all the conditions are of such a nature 
 that no great departures from known averages are likely 
 to occur. 
 
 The smaller transformers are rated for a temperature 
 rise of 40 C. over the surrounding air. An air tempera- 
 ture of 45 C., which might occasionally be reached in 
 badly-ventilated transformer chambers or pillars, would 
 then not cause damage. Larger transformers are rated 
 for a temperature rise of 45 C. as their load conditions 
 can more accurately be predetermined, and more care is 
 taken in placing them in properly-ventilated chambers. 
 Oil-insulated water-cooled transformers are normally 
 rated for 50 C. rise over the temperature of the 
 entering water ; as this will, under ordinary conditions, 
 not exceed 30 C., this rating should be safe. 
 
 Figs. 191 and 192 show a 4o-k.v.a. single-phase 
 oil-cooled shell transformer of the high-efficiency type. 
 Jt is designed for the standard frequency of 50 and a 
 primary voltage of 2000. The carcase weighs 220 kg., 
 and the winding 125 kg. The coil area is 350 sq. cm., 
 and the induction 6500 lines per sq. cm., giving a flux of 
 2*27 megalines. The window area is 216 sq. cm. The 
 quantity of oil required is 34 gallons, or 138 kg. No 
 cooling-worm is used, sufficient surface for air cooling 
 being provided by the corrugated sheet-iron case. In 
 smaller sizes up to 10 k.v.a. the case is of cast-iron, 
 and provided with lugs for fixing to hanger irons for 
 attachment to a wall. 
 
 In Fig. 193 is shown one of a set of three trans- 
 formers supplying current to a six-phase 1000 kw. 
 rotary converter. For this purpose each secondary 
 
EXAMPLES OF MODERN TRANSFORMERS 329 
 
 6 
 & 
 
 I 
 s 
 
 I 
 
330 
 
 TRANSFORMERS 
 
EXAMPLES OF MODERN TRANSFORMERS 331 
 
 circuit must be in two parts, so that four secondary 
 terminals are required. To provide extra cooling 
 surface the heads of the coils are splayed out, the 
 carcase is built up of narrow packets separated by 
 circulation ducts, and the corrugations of the case are 
 very deep. 
 
 Fig. 194 shows a three-phase core-type oil-cooled 
 transformer made for the Castner-Kellner Alkali Works, 
 Newcastle-on-Tyne. The capacity is 1200 k.v.a. at 
 5750 volt on the primary side, and 40 frequency. The 
 voltage on the secondary side is 175, but by altering the 
 method of connecting up, the same winding may be used 
 for different voltages. 
 
 Fig"- J 95 shows three different arrangements of 
 terminals, marked A, B, and C. The winding is sub- 
 divided into discs as explained in Chapter VIII. For 
 sizes larger than 1200 k.v.a. the cooling by a corru- 
 gated case is supplemented by a cold-water worm. 
 
 For pressures up to 20,000 volt cooling by artificial 
 blast without oil may be used. Fig. 196 shows a trans- 
 former of this type for 11,000 volt on the primary and 
 400 volt on the secondary side. The output is 550 
 k.v.a. at 33 frequency. A number of these trans- 
 formers have been installed at the Baker Street sub- 
 station of the Metropolitan Railway. They serve for 
 supplying current to rotary converters. The trans- 
 formers are kept cool by a strong air-blast sent in 
 through a duct in the floor. Gratings, the opening of 
 which may be separately regulated, are provided to 
 suitably sub-divide and direct the stream of air through 
 carcase and winding, and in order that the attendant 
 may see at a glance whether the ventilation is in order 
 a little wind-mill, indicated at a in Fig. 196, is fitted to 
 each transformer over the top grating. 
 
 The advantages of cooling by air-blast over cooling 
 by oil are greater cleanliness and convenience in case of 
 repair, but care must be taken to have the air free from 
 soot or dust. On the other hand, oil (unless it must be 
 supplemented by a water-worm) requires no accessory 
 apparatus, such as a fan, and no expenditure of power. 
 It has also the advantage of increasing the time constant. 
 
332 
 
 TRANSFORMERS 
 
 ft 
 
 ft ff 
 
 t t r t 
 
 FIG. 196. 55o-k.v.a. 1 1, 000/400- volt 
 
 air-blast transformer made by the 
 
 British Westinghouse Co., Ltd. 
 
EXAMPLES OF MODERN TRANSFORMERS 333 
 
 r 
 
 V F 
 
 .A. 
 
 J. 
 
 FIG. 197. Lamp transformer made by the British 
 Westinghouse Co., Ltd. * 
 
334 
 
 TRANSFORMERS 
 
EXAMPLES OF MODERN TRANSFORMERS 335 
 
 In transformers connected to overhead lines which are 
 liable to atmospheric disturbances it is also sometimes 
 claimed for oil that it acts as a self-healing insulation, 
 closing the small hole punctured in the solid dielectric 
 when a static discharge occurs. Whatever may be the 
 value of this view, the fact remains that experience 
 has led most makers to use oil for high-pressure 
 transformers. 
 
 With the advent of the wire lamp a demand has 
 arisen for very small transformers for single lamps or 
 groups of a few lamps. Wire lamps are at present 
 made for moderate voltages, 25 to no, but many of the 
 existing supply systems exceed these 
 limits, so that a transformer becomes 
 necessary to burn the lamps inde- 
 pendently. It is, of course, possible to 
 use one transformer for the whole of 
 the lamps, but then the iron loss would 
 reduce the yearly efficiency of the in- 
 stallations, and it is also questionable 
 whether the existing leads would be 
 able to carry the larger currents with 
 a moderate ohmic drop. When this is 
 not the case, small transformers of the 
 type shown in Figs. 197 and 198 may be 
 used. The switch must, of course, be put 
 on the primary side of the transformer, 
 the latter with its wire lamp taking simply 
 the place of the previous carbon lamp. Fig. 199 shows 
 a lamp-transformer attached to a wall bracket. 
 
 Messrs. Brown, Boveri & Co. The largest trans- 
 former ever made is probably that supplied by Messrs. 
 Brown, Boveri & Co. to the Betznau Power Station 
 (Switzerland). Its capacity is 4600 k.v.a., and it serves 
 to transform up a machine current of 8000 volt to a 
 line pressure of 27,000 volt. It is a three-phase core 
 type star-coupled transformer. Its primary phase volt- 
 age is 4650, and its secondary 15,620 volt. Figs. 200 
 to 202 show the construction to a scale of i : 20*6. 
 Fig. 203 shows the method of winding, and Fig. 204 is a 
 general view of the transformer by the side of its tank. 
 
 FIG. 199. Lamp 
 
 transformer on wall 
 
 bracket. 
 
336 
 
 TRANSFORMERS 
 
 FIG. 200. 46oo-k;V.a. three-phase transformer made by Messrs. Brown, Boveri & Co. 
 
EXAMPLES OF MODERN TRANSFORMERS 337 
 
 FIG. 201. 46oo-k.v.a. transformer made by Messrs. Brown, Boveri & Co. 
 
 22 
 
338 
 
 TRANSFORMERS 
 
 The following particulars will be of interest 
 
 Frequency * . . . "r ..-.." 50 
 
 Core area, sq. cm. , . . . . 2,380 
 Induction lines per sq. cm. . . . . 11,300 
 Flux in megalines . . . . ; . 26*9 
 
 Number of turns per phase in primary . 78 
 
 Number of turns per phase in secondary . 267 
 
 Area of primary conductor in sq. mm. '". 178 
 
 Area of secondary conductor in sq. mm. . 44 
 
 Current density in primary, ampere per sq. mm. 1*85 
 Current density in secondary, ampere per sq. mm. 2*14 
 Resistance of primary per phase in ohm . 0*030 
 
 Resistance of secondary per phase in ohm . 0^440 
 
 Iron loss measured in watt . ... . 40,500 
 
 Total copper loss measured in watt .. .-." 25,500 
 Efficiency at full load, per cent. . . . . 98*6 
 Maximum drop, per cent. . . . . 1*6 
 
 FIG. 202. 46cx)-k.v.a. three-phase transformer made by Messrs. Brown, Boveri & Co. 
 
EXAMPLES OF MODERN TRANSFORMERS 339 
 
 The total weight of iron is 12 tons, so that with full 
 non-inductive load the weight of iron is only 2*6 kg. 
 per kw. The copper weight is 2400 kg. or 0*524 kg. 
 per kw. The total weight of active material is only 
 
 ABOVE 
 
 Presspahn 
 distance, pieces 
 
 The 40 top turns 
 separated by 
 1mm. presspahn 
 
 BELOW 
 
 FIG. 203. Method of separating the primary and 
 secondary coils. 
 
 SO 
 
 3*124 kg. per kw. It will be obvious that with 
 large a reduction in the weight of active material per kw. 
 a very perfect cooling device becomes necessary, and for 
 this reason the usual plain cooling pipe has been replaced 
 
340 TRANSFORMERS 
 
 by an elaborate cooler provided with ribs in the manner 
 of a radiator as shown in Figs. 201 and 202. The 
 terminals are taken through long porcelain tubes, the 
 lower ends of which are well below the oil level. 
 
 FIG. 204. 46oo-k.v.a. three-phase transformer made by Messrs. Brown, 
 Boveri & Co. 
 
 Messrs. Siemens Schuckert Werke. Figs. 205 and 206 
 illustrate an air-cooled transformer of the shell type for 
 50 frequency, 3000 to 220 volt, and 6'86 to 92 ampere. 
 The dimensions inscribed are mm. The carcase is built 
 up of 0*3 mm. alloyed sheets insulated to 0^33 mm., 
 and has butt-joints. The iron weight is 165 kg. and 
 the measured iron loss at the induction of 9700 is 
 
 335 watt > or at tne rate f 2 '3 watt P er kg- This 
 agrees within a few per cent, with the curve given on 
 
 page 26. 
 
EXAMPLES OF MODERN TRANSFORMERS 341 
 
 -325 
 
 700 
 
 FIG. 205. 2O-k.v.a. 3OOO/22O-volt transformer made by Siemens Schuckert Werke. 
 
342 
 
 TRANSFORMERS 
 
 The particulars of this transformer are as follows 
 
 Core area in sq. cm. . . ; . . 300 
 
 Flux in megalines . . . . . 2-9 
 
 Number of turns in primary . . V . 464 
 
 Number of turns in secondary . i . 34 
 
 Section of primary sq. mm. . . ".-'. ' 6 
 
 Section of secondary sq. mm. .. .. . . 80 
 
 Resistance of primary hot in ohm . . 2*25 
 
 Resistance of secondary hot in ohm , / 0*0126 
 
 Ohmic drop in per cent. ., . , . 1*03 
 
 Inductive drop in per cent. . . . ; . 0*90 
 
 Maximum possible drop in per cent. . j 1*37 
 
 Final temperature rise in iron, degree C. . / 55 
 
 Final temperature rise in copper, degree C. . 55 
 
 FIG. 206. Side view of Fig. 206. 
 
FIG. 207. 14-k.v.a. three-phase transformer made by Siemens Schuckert Werke. 
 
 FIG. 208. Plan of Fig. 207. 
 
344 
 
 TRANSFORMERS 
 
 The primary winding is subdivided into 4 coils of 
 116 turns. Each coil consists of 58 layers of 2 turns, 
 the section of copper being 1*3 mm. by 47 mm. wide. 
 The secondary winding is also subdivided into 4 coils, two 
 of which have each 8 turns, and the other two 9 turns. 
 The copper section is 10 mm. by 8 mm. wide. It is 
 
 T 
 
 ^^TI 
 
 M 
 
 T^-N 
 
 
 
 
 ~^ ~-~~ 
 
 1 
 
 " 
 
 < 200 
 
 1 
 
 1- 
 
 | 
 
 A ^ 
 
 --3-- 
 
 - L^^^^,- - 
 
 I 
 
 Jt 
 
 
 i 
 
 ~t ifz 4 
 
 
 I 
 
 I 
 
 i 
 i 
 
 t 
 
 
 
 1 
 I 
 
 
 
 i 
 
 
 / 
 
 
 V 
 
 u 
 
 FIG. 209. End view of Fig. 208. 
 
 made up of two strips, 5 by 8 mm. wound on together. 
 The weights are 
 
 Carcase . ... . , .165 kg. 
 
 Primary copper . V _, 37*3 ,, 
 
 Secondary copper . . -.; 36*1 ,, 
 
 Total active material . . 238*4 ,, 
 
 or at the rate of 11*92 kg. per kw. at full non-inductive 
 load. The efficiency is 97^ * 
 
 /o* 
 
EXAMPLES OF MODERN TRANSFORMERS 345 
 
 A three-phase transformer, also of the shell type, 
 with butt joints, is illustrated in Figs. 207 to 209. The 
 dimensions are mm. It is a I4~k.v.a. oil-cooled trans- 
 
 FIG. 210. looo-k.v.a. three-phase transformer made by Siemens Schuckert Werke. 
 
 former for 50 frequency, 3000 to 200 volt, and 2*8 to 37*4 
 ampere. Both circuits are star coupled. The windows 
 are 87 mm. square, and each contains 518 primary and 
 
346 
 
 TRANSFORMERS 
 
 38 secondary wires. Each primary is arranged in two 
 coils, and each of these has 28 layers of 9 turns and one 
 
 FIG. 2ii. Side view of Fig. 210. 
 
 layer of 7 turns. The two coils are placed side by side, 
 and outside of them are placed the two secondary coils, 
 each containing 19 turns. The primary conductor is 
 
EXAMPLES OF MODERN TRANSFORMERS 347 
 
 round wire of 1*8 mm., the secondary is strip 3*4 mm. 
 by 9*4 mm. wide. The resistance cold is, for the primary 
 4*2, and fpr the secondary 0*0245 ohm. per phase. The 
 weight of carcase is 149 kg., and the measured iron 
 loss at an induction of 9600 is 276 watt or r86 watt per 
 kg., which corresponds exactly with the Author's tests 
 recorded in Fig. n. The primary copper weighs 
 38*8 kg., and the secondary 36*4 kg. The total copper 
 
 
 <$ j._ - .-.-.-.- p. - _ *._._ _. 
 
 1"- , -* -v ?n - t.-f.^'l: fflr.f--tr.--tr i.-^ 
 
 FIG. 212. Plan of Fig. 210. 
 
 loss at full load when the transformer is hot is 250 watt. 
 The final temperature rise, both in iron and copper, is 
 55 C. The inductive drop is 1*8 % ; the ohmic drop is 
 
 i-5 % . 
 
 A three-phase transformer for 1000 k.v.a. at 50 
 frequency is illustrated in Figs. 210 to 212. It is also 
 of the shell type with butt joints, but with special 
 cooling appliances. The transformation ratio is 5000 
 to 10,000 volt, the iron loss amounts to 8*3 kw., and the 
 
343 
 
 TRANSFORMERS 
 
 . 
 
 FIG. 213. 225O-k.v.a. three-phase transformer made by Siemens 
 Schuckert Werke. 
 
EXAMPLES OF MODERN TRANSFORMERS 349 
 
 copper loss to 6*82 kw., corresponding to an efficiency of 
 98*5 % at full non-inductive load. Oil is used for cooling, 
 and to facilitate the flow of heat from oil to case the 
 latter is provided with internal ribs, as shown in 
 Fig. 212. There is no cold-water worm employed, 
 but to cool the case its external surface is played on 
 by water. For this purpose a water-supply pipe is laid 
 round the top of the case on the outside. This pipe is 
 provided with holes through which the water is squirted 
 against the outer surface of the case, and, flowing 
 
 o 
 
 D 
 
 D 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 FIG. 214. Carcase of three-phase Siemens Schuckert 
 225 . . . . = specific cooling surface. 
 
 w . . . = an angular speed. 
 
 v . . . = frequency, complete periods per second. 
 
 356 
 
APPENDIX III 
 
 FORMULA USED 
 
 No. 
 
 Page 
 
 Formula 
 
 Subject 
 
 i 
 
 10 
 
 TT * g 
 
 Crest value of E.M.F. 
 
 2 
 
 3 
 4 
 
 12 
 
 12 
 12 
 
 *-4*- 
 
 Effective value of an alter- 
 nating current of sine 
 form 
 
 Effective value of an alter- 
 nating current of any 
 form 
 
 Effective value of an alter- 
 nating E.M.F. of any 
 form 
 
 ,w;y;v, 
 
 
 
 
 
 5 
 
 14 
 
 e- E 
 
 Effective value of an alter- 
 nating E.M.F. of sine 
 form 
 
 6 
 
 14 
 
 ,- 4 -44v*io- 
 
 Effective E.M.F. in coil 
 of transformer 
 
 7 
 
 !I 7 
 
 = /fcB r6 
 
 Energy per cycle 
 
 8 20 
 
 P -o-iQ/A " B V 
 
 Loss due to eddy currents 
 in ordinary transformer 
 plates. 
 
 JT w U 1 U 1 / \ 
 
 \ 100 IOOO/ 
 
 Sa 
 
 22 
 
 P *--"(lio- 8 
 
 E.M.F. of flat curve 
 
 10 30 
 
 e = 4'62vio- 8 
 
 E.M.F. of peaked curve 
 
 ii 55 
 
 c 
 
 Temperature rise 
 
 12 
 
 61 
 
 t=^j~ 
 
 Time constant in seconds 
 
 13 
 
 14 
 
 61 
 61 
 
 / T \ 
 
 Heating time in seconds 
 Heating time in hours 
 
 2*3' / T \ 
 
 3600 VT -y/ 
 
 357 
 
358 
 
 TRANSFORMERS 
 
 No. 
 
 Page 
 
 Formula 
 
 Subject 
 
 
 
 a+& b_ 
 
 
 15 
 
 65 
 
 p _ PI(*~*~ ~ J ) - p o(^ ~ J ) 
 
 Permissible load for inter- 
 mittent working 
 
 + 
 
 
 
 e^-e* 
 
 
 16 
 
 74 
 
 G-c P 
 
 Weight of carcase 
 
 / v ff#p 
 
 \ 
 
 
 
 IOO 
 
 
 i7 
 
 84 
 
 e = U 
 
 E.M.F. of self-induction 
 
 18 
 
 g 
 
 Z = w (>10- 6 
 
 Condenser or capacity 
 
 
 
 
 current 
 
 
 
 
 
 Current through resist- 
 
 in 
 
 Q 
 
 
 s^t^. o - r\ \t*kf\iir'\'CiY\r i '* in 
 
 j 
 
 
 VR 2 + W 
 
 cinCc dllLl UlU.U.i-'tcHix^C ill 
 
 series 
 
 20 
 
 86 
 
 / 
 
 Current through resist- 
 ance, inductance, and 
 
 
 
 
 \/ R 2 + (^L - j 
 
 capacity in series 
 
 21 
 
 8? 
 
 IOOO 
 
 d) 
 
 Natural angular velocity 
 
 
 u / 
 
 VCL 
 
 
 22 
 
 87 
 
 I 60 
 
 ~VcE 
 
 Natural frequency 
 
 2 3 
 
 93 
 
 P = cos  
 100 o"i (t j -f- i 
 
 Inductive drop in cylin- 
 drical coils 
 
 e ^< \" 3 J I 
 
 34 
 
 181 
 
 ioo ^_ o X /z/ + 2\ /^ + # 1 + 2 \/ 
 
 Inductive drop in flat 
 coils 
 
 J < \ A 6/1 
 
 35 
 
 182 
 
 e s , X/, a 1 + a z \p 
 
 Inductive drop in shell 
 transformer with sand- 
 
 e "^V 6 // 
 
 m 
 
 
 
 wiched coils 
 
 36 
 
 184 
 
 i/-r 3 D" 
 
 Relation between drop 
 
 
 
 
 and frequency for the 
 
 
 
 
 same iron heat 
 
 37 
 
 234 
 
 B ^ 
 
 ^ 7 " ^ 
 
 Induction in sample when 
 tested by Epstein ap- 
 
 1000 J vA 
 
 
 
 
 paratus of normal con- 
 
 
 
 
 struction 
 
 38 
 
 235 
 
 P = //!i/B*+/(i/B) 2 
 
 General expression for 
 
 
 
 
 iron loss 
 
 39 
 
 243 
 
 , I 2^> 
 
 Ballistic constant 
 
 
 
 
 T O ioor 
 
 
 40 
 
 243 
 
 t> = ~ 
 
 55 55 
 
 
 
 T i T 
 
 
 41 
 
 244 
 
 
 55 5J 
 
 
 
 27T X 27T 
 
 
 42 
 
 246 
 
 /3=2/4 
 
 Logarithmic decrement 
 
 43 
 
 246 
 
 .T = a- (i+' / 8) 
 
 Undamped elongation 
 
 44 
 
 249 
 
 
 
 n 
 
 Change of flux given by 
 fluxometer 
 
 45 
 
 252 
 
 (fr = ^mtQ 
 
 Total flux given by 
 
 
 
 
 shunted fluxometer 
 
 46 
 
 257 
 
 e _ n d. net. 
 
 Houston, 2s. 6d. net. 
 
 Maycock, 2s. 6d. 
 
 Manual Instruction, Woodwork, 
 
 Barter, 6s. 
 
 Drawing, Barter, 3^. 6d. 
 
 Metal Work, Miller, $s.6d. 
 
 Manures, Griffiths, fs. 6d. 
 
 Marine Engineers, Advice to, Roberts, 
 
 31. net. 
 Drawing and Designing, 
 
 Roberts, 6s. 
 
 Electric Lighting, Walker, 
 
 Jji. 
 Marine Steam Turbine, Sothern, 65-. 
 
 net. 
 
 Massee's The Plant World, 2s. 6d. 
 Mathematical Tables, Hutton, I2s. 
 Mathematics, Elementary, Hatton, 
 
 2s. 6d. 
 
 Maxim's Artificial and Natural 
 
 Flight, 5j, net. 
 May's Ballooning, 2s. 6d. 
 Maycock's Electricity and Magnetism, 
 
 2s. 6d. 
 Maycock's Electric Lighting and 
 
 Power Distribution, vol. i. 6s. net. ; 
 
 vol. ii. 7-c. 6d. 
 Alternating Current Circuit and 
 
 Motor, 4^. 6d. net. 
 
 Electric Wiring, Fittings, 
 
 Switches, and Lamps, 6s. 
 
 Details Forms, 2s. 6d. net. 
 
 Electric Wiring Tables, y. 6d. 
 
 Mazzotto's Wireless Telegraphy, 
 
 35-. 6d. net. 
 
 Measurements, Electrical, Crapper. 
 Electrical Arithmetic, Whittaker, 
 
 is. net. 
 
 Houston, 4.T. 6d. net. 
 Mechanical Engineer's Pocket-Book, 
 
 Bjorling, 35-. 6d. net. 
 Tables, Foden, is. 6d. 
 
 Refrigeration, Williams, los. 6d. 
 Metal Turning, Horner, 35. 6d. 
 
 Work, Atkins, 6s. net. 
 
 Work, Leland, 5-r. 
 
 . . Miller, y. 6d. 
 
 Metric System, Wagstaff, is. 6d. 
 
 Perkin, is. 6d. net. 
 Middleton's Surveying and Surveying 
 
 Instruments, 5J-. 
 Mill Work, Sutcliffe, ioj. 6d. 
 Miller's Metal Work, 3^. 6d. 
 Mine, Coal, Boyd, 3*. 6d. 
 Mineralogy, Hatch, 2s. 6d. 
 Mining, Coal, Burns and Kerr, 10 
 
 Parts, 2s. each net. 
 Model Engines, Alexander, 5^. net. 
 Moedebeck's Aeronautics, los. 6d. net. 
 Motor Cars, Farman, 5^. 
 
 Ignition Methods, Hibbert, 
 
 is. 6d. net. 
 Motors, Commutator, Punga, 4^. 6d. net. 
 Electric, Bottone, 3^. 
 
 Hobart, 125. 6d. net. 
 
 Maycock, 4.$-. 6d. net. 
 Hydraulic, Bodmer, 
 
 Moving Loads on Railway Bridges, 
 Bamford, 4*. 6d. net. 
 
 Municipal Electricity Supply, Gib- 
 bings, 6s. 
 
 Nadieine, Drainage, is. 
 
 Neumann's Electrolytic Analysis, 6s. 
 
 Optical Activity and Chemical Com- 
 position, Landolt, 4^. 6d. 
 
 Instruments, Orford, 2s. 6d. 
 
 Optics, Geometrical, Blakesley, 2s.6d. 
 
UNIVERSITY OI 
 
 Optics of P 
 
 net. 
 Orford's Lens Work, 3*. 
 
 THIS BOOK IS DUE ON THE LAST DATE 
 STAMPED BELOW 
 
 AN INITIAL FINE OF 25 CENTS 
 
 WILL BE ASSESSED FOR FAILURE TO RETURN 
 THIS BOOK ON THE DATE DUE. THE PENALTY 
 WILL INCREASE TO 5O CENTS ON THE FOURTH 
 DAY AND TO $1.OO ON THE SEVENTH DAY 
 OVERDUE. 
 
 Rudorf's Periodic Classification and 
 
 Chemical Evolution, 4$. 6d. 
 Russell's Electric Cables, los. 6d. 
 ratt, 
 
 FEB 27193 
 
 FEB 28 i i 
 APR 17 1933 
 
 8 1S34 
 
 &** 
 
 29 
 
 jymbols, Greene, 
 ,ight Installations, 
 of Accumulators, 
 
 [.*?.; 
 
 Nadieine, is. 
 Limbing, Sutcliffe, 
 
 1 Vocab., French- 
 et. 
 :al Work, Atkins, 
 
 nutator Motors, 
 
 th, 2s. 
 ter, 6s. 
 
 ?ards for Marine 
 net. 
 
 Turbine, 6s. net. 
 ieat, Ashworth, 
 
 Neuman and 
 il edition, 2s. 6d. 
 [net. 
 Building Work, 
 
 icr, is. 6d. 
 looke, 75. 6d. 
 , Alexander, $s. 
 
 "ill Work, Sut- 
 
 Maginnis, zs.Gd. 
 
 neering, Stevens 
 
 let. 
 
 othern, 6.r. net. 
 
 ^sis, Arnold & 
 
 net. 
 
 ctures, Twelve- 
 
 Ivetrees, 6^. net. 
 Twelvetrees, 
 
 > Steam Turbine 
 let. 
 
 rrents, $s. 
 ;nts, 6s. net. 
 Farrow, $s. net. 
 Steel, Twelve- 
 
 LD 21-50m-l,'35Veying Instru- 
 
Surveying and Levelling, Walmisley, 
 6s. net. 
 
 - Field Work and Instruments, 
 Walmisley, 5-r. net. 
 
 Sutclifte's Steam Power and Mill 
 Work, ior. 6d. 
 
 - Sanitary Fittings and PJtembing, 
 $s. net. .. *& " 
 
 Switches, Electric, Maycock, 6s. 
 Tables, Electric Wiring, Maycock, 
 3*. 6d. 
 
 - Mathematical, Hutton, 12s. 
 
 - Mechanical, Foden, is. 6d. 
 
 - Percentage, for Analysis, G* 
 mann, 3*. net. 
 
 Taylor's Optics of Photography, _ 
 
 net. 
 Teacher's Handbook jbf Metal 
 
 Miller, 3j. 6d. 
 Telegraphic Vocabulary 
 
 3/. los. net. 
 Telegraphy, Herbert. 
 
 - Wireless, Bot* 
 
 Telephone Sys* 
 Office HP 
 
 in, 
 
 .lanual, 
 
 .s. 6d. 
 Traction"/ Electric, Rider, 105-. 6d. 
 
 net. 
 Transformers, Kapp, los. 6d. net. 
 
 Still, $s. 
 
 Trigonometry, Adams, 2s. 6d. net. 
 Tubes and Pipes, Bjorling, 31. 6d. 
 
 net. 
 
 Vacuum, Salomons, 2s. 
 
 Turbines and Hydraulic Motors, 
 
 Bodmer, 15^. 
 Turbines, Steam, Stevens and Hobart, 
 
 2is. net. 
 Marine, Sothern, 6s. net. 
 
 Turner and Hobart's Insulation of 
 
 Electric Machines, los. 6d. net. 
 Turning Metal, Horner, 31. 6d. 
 Twelvetrees' Structural Iron and Steel, 
 6s. net. 
 
 Concrete-Steel, 6s. net. 
 
 Concrete- Steel Buildings, icw.net 
 
 Vacuum Tubes, Experiments, Salo- 
 mons, 2S. 
 
 Vc/ ^tric Analysis, Coppock, 2s. 
 7 /Ps Metric System, is. 6d. 
 
 I Electricity in Homes and 
 
 shops, 5*. net. 
 
 .ctric Lighting for Marine 
 
 eers, 5*. 
 
 .id Hawkins' Dynamo, i$s. 
 
 sy's Field Work and Instru- 
 
 5-r. net. 
 id Surveying and Levelling, 
 
 s Friction, its Reduction, 31. 
 :r's Mechanical Engineer's 
 .-Book, 35. 6d. net. 
 O . electrical Engineer's Pocket- 
 * jok, 3^. 6d. net. 
 
 Arithmetic of Electrical Engin- 
 eering, is. net. 
 Williams' Mechanical Refrigeration, 
 
 los. 6d. 
 Wireless Telegraphy, Bottone, 31. 
 
 Mazzotto, \s. 6d. net. 
 
 Wiring, Electric, Maylcock, 6s. 
 
 net. 
 
 Wood's Discount Tables, is. 
 Woodwork, Barter, 6s. 
 
 Drawing, 3^. 6d. 
 
 Woven Design, Colour in, Beaumont, 
 
 21S. 
 
 X Rays, Bottone, 3^. 6d. net. 
 Yates' Textbook of Botany, zs. 6d. net. 
 Yeaman and Gay's C. S. Electricity 
 Supply, lew. 6d. net. 
 
 Complete Catalogue of Technical and Scientific Books, Post Free, 
 
 WHITTAKER & CO. 
 WHITE HART STREET, PATERNOSTER SQUARE, LONDON, E.C.