/ % ^ ■' .Lmk~ I '■At j,.R:'. W^4 .S & 1~ ?v ^%-^ THE Union Theological Seminary CITY OF NEW YORK: HISTORICAL AND BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCHES OF ITS FIRST FIFTY YEARS. BY GEORGE LEWIS PRENTISS. To cTTtetKes v/xwv yvwcr^>7Tw iraa-iv dv^pcuTroi?. 'O Kvpio<; cyyvs. Phil. iv. 5. NEW YORK: ANSON D. F. RANDOLPH AND CO. i88q. Copyright, 1889, By Anson D. F. Randolph and Co. UntbcrsttD Press: John Wilson and Son, Cambridge. PEEFACE. " I "HIS volume, prepared by request of the Board of Directors and Faculty of the Union Theological Seminary in the City of New York, contains the ad- dress, a portion of which was delivered at the Semi- centenary of the Institution, on December 7, 1886, and also biographical sketches of the men whose names as Founders, Directors, Benefactors, and Professors are identified with its history. I regret that, owing to pro- tracted ill health, as well as to difficulty in obtaining the requisite material for many of these sketches, the publication of the work has been so long delayed, and that for the same reason it falls far short of what I desired to make it. Not long after the celebration. President Hitchcock, who took a deeper interest in it than any one else, suddenly departed this life ; a loss soon followed by that of two of the oldest Directors. It seems fitting that some notice of them also should appear in this volume, although the record of their death belongs to the second, and not the first, half-century of the Seminary. New York, September 24, 1889. IV1130145 CONTENTS. PART FIRST. HISTORICAL ADDRESS. PAGE I. Theological Seminaries in the United States .... 3 II. Origin and Design of the Union Theological Seminary 5 III. The Founders of the Union Theological Seminary as PLANNED AND ORGANIZED 8 IV. The Seminary equipped and opened for Instruction. — Its E.-vRLY Trials and Struggle for Existence 20 V. Early Ecclesiastical and Theological Position of the Seminary 34 VI. Development of the Seminary in its Scope and Teaching Force 4.4. VII. Successive Endowment Efforts. — Later Financial His- tory. — Departed Friends and Benefactors. — Removal of the Seminary 52 VIII. Departed Professors, and what the Seminary owes to them CO IX. The Library, its Growth and Needs. — Some Lessons of the Semi-centennial Catalogue. — National and Mis- sionary Character of the Seminary. — Its Alumni . . 73 X. Present Condition of the Seminary. — Its Relation to the Past and the Future S3 Note A. The Course of Study 88 Note B. Professorships, Lectureships, Fellowships, etc. . . 94 ^ CONTENTS. PAGE KoTE C. Extracts fkom the Sermon entitled "The Union Theological Seminary" Note D. The Treasures of the Library Note E. Alumni who have been engaged in the Foreign Mis- ... 107 sioNARY Service PART SECOND. BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCHES OF FOUNDERS, DIRECTORS, BENEFACTORS, AND PROFESSORS. I Founders, Directors, and Benefactors 109-240 . . 243-274 II. Professors . . 285 INDEX part MvQU HISTORICAL ADDRESS Delivered in Adams Chapel, December 7, 1886. FIFTY YEARS OF THE UNION THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK. I. THEOLOGICAL SEMINARIES IN THE UNITED STATES. n^HE Theological Seminary in tins country may be regarded as one of the characteristic institu- tions of American Christianity. It is mainly the growth of our own soil during the present century. There are in the United States not less than one hundi'ed and forty schools of divinity, only two or three of which date further back than 1800, and more than half of which have been organized within the last forty years. These schools represent all Protestant denominations, as well as the Church of Rome, and they are found in every part of the Union. In them the spiritual guides and teachers of the American people are chiefly trained ; not only ministers of the Gospel in the strictest sense, whether bishops, pastors, or evangelists, but editors of the 4 THE UXIOX THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY. religious press, college presidents and professors, secretaries of ecclesiastical boards and other associ- ations for advancing the kingdom of God on earth, are mostly graduates of these institutions. It is not too much to say that our theological seminaries, to a very large extent, have in their keeping the most precious interests of faith, piety, and sacred learning in the United States. While differing radically as to polity and doctrine, they are nearly all agreed in asserting the divine origin and claims of Christianity, the ruling authority of the Holy Scriptures, the spirit- ual nature and destiny of man, as also the vital con- nection between his character and manner of life here and his eternal well-being. Their influence in tlie whole domain of belief and conduct is both formative and controlling. In the matter of education for the ministry they show a revolution like that which has taken place in other great spheres of professional train- ing. The divinity schools of the last century were mostly in the studies and parishes of eminent theolo- gians, who at the same time were often country pas- tors, — such men, for example, as Bellamy, Smalley, Hopkins, and Emmons in New England; the divinity schools of the present are in or near the great centres of population, where the throbbing, busy life of the nation is going on ; they are permanent institutions of sacred learning. I ORIGIN AND DESIGN. II. ORIGIN AND DESIGN OF THE UNION THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY. We celebrate to-day the Fiftieth Anniversary of the Union Theological Seminary. In reviewing- its his- tory I shall touch only briefly upon the points so fully treated by my colleague, President Hitchcock, in his address at the dedication of these buildings two years ago. It is not my business to '' gild refined gold." The character of an institution, like that of an individual, is apt to be determined in its origin and early years. Certainly, this has been the case with the Union Seminary. It is now essentially what, fifty years ago, it was intended to be. It has, indeed, grown and prospered far beyond the hopes of its founders ; but it has grown and prospered largely along the lines they marked out, and in the spirit in which it was planned. The time and the circum- stances of its beginning were alike fortunate, — I should rather say, providential. Had it been estab- lished seven or eight years earlier, as almost happened, it would have been in direct antagonism to another seminary. Had it been established, on the other hand, a few years later, its design would in all proba- bility have been far less catholic, if not distinctly par- tisan. In a letter dated New York, June 5, 1827, the 6 THE UNION THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY. Rev. Dr. John Holt E-ice of Prince Edward County, Viro-inia, one of the best and wisest men in the Pres- byterian Church of that day, makes this striking statement : — While all the brethren appear to regard me with great personal affection, neither of the parties are entirely cordial to me. The Princeton people apprehend that I am approxi- mating to Auburn notions ; and the zealous partisans of New England divinity think me a thorough-going Princetonian. So it is ! And, while there is much less of the unseemly bit- terness and asperity which brought reproach on the Church in past times, I can see that the spirit of party has struck deeper than I had ever supposed. And I do fully expect that there will be either a strong effort to bring Princeton under different management, or to build up a new seminary in the vicinity of New York, to counteract the influence of Princeton. One or the other of these things will assuredly be done before long, unless the Lord interpose and turn the hearts of the ministers. In another letter, dated June 15, he writes : — I should not be surprised if, next year, we should hear of a seminary for the vicinity of New York. I cannot tell you in a letter all that I have learned here, but you shall know when I see you. Dr. Rice does not name the ministers who, he says, contemplated building up a new seminary to counter- act the influence of Princeton. It is plain, however, that he could not have had in mind the most of those who eight years later took part in founding this insti- tution ; for they were not then settled in New York. ORIGIN AND DESIGN. 7 The period between 1827 and 1836 abounded in trouble to the Presbyterian Church. More and more the theological atmosphere became charg-ed with sus- picion and bitterness. Old quarrels grew sharper than ever. New quarrels sprung up. During these years the controversies about " New^ Divinity," " New Haven Theology," ''New England Divinity," "New Meas- ures," "Protracted Meetings," "Ecclesiastical Boards," " Voluntary Societies," and the like, were in full blast. The memorable trials of George Duffield, Albert Barnes, and Lyman Beecher for heresy belong to the same period. These controversies and heresy trials — to say nothing here of the slavery question — aroused passions that wrought powerfully in two ways ; while hastening the di\dsion of the Presby- terian Church, they at the same time impressed not a few thoughtful and good men, especially among the laity, with a deep feeling of the evil effect of such strife upon the interests of Christian piety and evangelism, — a feeling intensified by the great re- vivals of 1829-33. To men of this class the heated discussions of the day were exceedingly distasteful. "The evangelical men," wrote Dr. Rice in 1829, "are disputing, some for old orthodoxy, and some for new metaphysics." But meanwhile the conflict waxed more violent. Among the advocates of " old orthodoxy " some were very dogmatical and overbearing in their tone; the advocates of " new metaphysics," on the other hand, 8 THE UNION THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY. were tempted to retort in a spirit anything but con- ciliatory. Nor was the strife confined to the pulpit and the religious press : it invaded meetings of Pres- bytery, Synod, and General Assembly, and became at length a determined struggle for ecclesiastical su- premacy. Two years before this struggle culminated in the great disruption of 1838, the Union Seminary was planned and organized. But although built up in troublous times, it was as a training school and rallying point for men of peace, not of war. It is the design of the founders to provide a Theological Seminary in the midst of the greatest and most growing com- munity in America, around which all men of moderate views and feelings, who desire to live free from party strife, and to stand aloof from all extremes of doctrinal speculation, practical radicalism, and ecclesiastical domination, may cordially and affectionately rally. III. THE FOUNDERS OF THE UNION THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY AS PLANNED AND ORGANIZED. Such was the design of the founders, as described by themselves. Who were the founders of the Union Theological Seminary? Fortunately, its official rec- ords furnish a clear answer to the question. And it seems to me only right that on this occasion these rec- ords should be allowed to speak for themselves. Here are the minutes of the earliest formal meeting : — FOUNDERS OF THE INSTITUTION. 9 New York, October 10, 1835. At a meeting of a few gentlemen convened, by mutual un- derstanding, at the house of Knowles Taylor, Esq., to take into consideration the expediency of establishing a Theologi- cal Seminary in the city of New York. Present: Knowles Taylor, Esq. Rev. Absalom Peters, D. D. Richard T. Haines, Esq. Rev. Henry White. Abijah Fisher, Esq. Rev. William Patton. AVilliam M. Halsted, Esq. Rev. Erskine Mason. Marcus Wilbm-, Esq. Opened with prayer. Knowles Taylor was called to the chair, and the Rev. Erskine Mason was appointed Secretary. After a free in- terchange of views upon the subject, it was unanimously Resolved, That it is expedient, depending on the blessing of God, to attempt to establish a Theological Seminary in this city. Resolved, That a committee be appointed as a " Committee of Ways and Means" to take this subject into further consid- eration, with power to call a meeting as soon as they shall be able to report. Messrs. K. Taylor, R. T. Haines, and W. M. Halsted were appointed this committee. Adjourned. Concluded with prayer. Erskine Mason, Secretary. The second meeting was held on October 19, 1835, when in addition to those ah-eady named there were present Fisher Howe, John Nitchie, Lowell Holbrook, James C. Bliss, M. D., and Cornehus Baker. Again Knowles Taylor was called to the chair, and the Eev. Erskine Mason was appointed Secretary. The Committee of Ways and Means having reported 10 THE UNION THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY. progress and been continued, the minutes proceed as follows : — Resolved, That a committee be appointed to draft an exhibit of the reasons calling for the contemplated institution, and also an outhne of a plan of instruction to be pursued. The Rev. Messrs. Mason, Peters, Patton, Wliite, and John Nitchie, Esq., were appointed as this committee. Resolved, That a committee be appointed to suggest the best mode of organizing a board of directors for this institu- tion. Messrs. Taylor, Nitchie, Baker, and Halsted, and Rev. Dr. Peters, were appointed this committee. Adjourned to meet on Monday, 26th instant, at 7^ o'clock, at the house of Knowles Taylor, Esq. Concluded with prayer. Erskine Mason, Secretary. Let me speak briefly of these men and of their qualifications for the task before them. Absalom Peters stands first among the four minis- ters of the Gospel. He belonged to an old Puritan stock, learned in his boyhood, on a New Hampshire farm, how to endure hardness, and grew up in such physical soundness and vigor that until more than threescore and ten years old he is said never to have known a sick day. The high reputation which he enjoyed at this time may be inferred from the fact, that on the retirement of Dr. Griffin, in 1836, Dr. Peters Avas chosen to succeed him as President of Williams College. Upon his declining the call, Mark Hopkins was appointed. He possessed a keen in- tellect, strong will, patient energy, and uncommon FOUNDERS OF THE INSTITUTION. H administrative ability, combined with literary culture, good learning-, and whole-hearted zeal for the advance- ment of Christ's kingdom in the w^orld; nor was he without a touch of the poetical temperament. In the ecclesiastical conflicts of fifty years ago, he took rank among the leaders. Had he devoted himself to a mili- tary career, as at one time he intended, his name might have become famous as a general ; and he was equally fitted to win a foremost place at the bar, on the bench, or in political life. Cool, sagacious, fear- less, and master of his case, he was well qualified to cope on the floor of the General Assembly, as he did in the stormy sessions of 1836-37, with such debaters as John and Robert J. Breckenridge and William S. Plumer. The opponents of voluntar}^ societies and of New England ideas regarded Dr. Peters with no little dislike, as well as fear. At the '* nod of the arch- magician,'' as he was called, votes were suj^posed to be given or withheld in the General Assembly. I remember how in my boyhood the changes were rung upon his name as an adroit ecclesiastical man- ager and wire-puller. He was equalled by few men of his generation, I doubt if any one surpassed him, as an organizer and advocate of Home Mission work in the United States ; and the same qualities that made him so useful as a founder and early secretary of the American Home Missionary Society, rendered him invaluable as one of the founders of the Union 12 THE UNION THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY. Theological Seminary. He was on the committee to set forth the design of the institution, and propose a plan of instruction ; he was a member of the com- mittee on organization, and he was chairman of the committee which prepared the constitution. This Seminary is bound to hold the name of Absalom Peters in lasting honor. Henry White is the second name. He was at this time pastor of the Allen Street Presbyterian Church, to which he had been called in 1828. I shall have occasion to speak of him later as a Professor in the Seminary. His services as one of its founders were of the utmost value. There can be no doubt that, in the various meetings and consultations which issued in its establishment, he exerted a constant, wise, and shaping influence. He possessed an uncommonly sound judgment, was at once prudent and sagacious, had great tenacity of purpose, and enjoyed in a high degree the confidence of the laymen who were enlisted in the movement. Several of them were his intimate friends and elders in the Allen Street Church. William Patton is the third name. He was a man of large and generous views, strong in his con- victions of right and duty, as well as bold in asserting them ; a natural enemy of wrong, oppression, and intolerance : one of the earliest and ablest advocates of the temperance reform ; an ardent patriot, whether at home or abroad, and a firm believer in the provi- dential mission and destiny of the American people. FOUNDERS OF THE INSTITUTION. 13 He suggested the assembling of the convention wliieh in 1846 organized in London the Evangelical Alli- ance, and went himself as a delegate from America to that convention. As one of the founders of this institution, he is in a special manner entitled to our remembrance to-day. If not the first to suggest a theological seminary in the vicinity of New York, he seems to have been the first to suggest one in New York itself. In a letter to the Rev. Edwin F. Hatfield, D.D., written in 1876, he relates that Dr. Peters called upon him one day to consult him as to the best disposition of some funds, which Mr. H., a well known gentleman, held in his hands and desired to appropriate to a good object. I at once said, "Let the funds be given to commence a theo- logical seminary in this city," for I had been thinking on this subject. Dr. Peters said, " That will never do, it is no place for a seminary," and made a number of objections. I then argued the matter with him, to prove tliat a great city is exactly the place, as furnishing enlarged and available means of support to the indigent, by teaching singing in churches, playing on organs, etc. ; also means of practical usefulness, while studying, bringing the student away from the cloistered life of the colleges and seminaries in the country, and intro- ducing them into the masses of men among whom they must work as ministers ; that it would be a good trial of their piety and fidelity, and that, if any failed, it would be better to have them fail then than later. I so far overcame Dr. Petcrs's ob- jections as to name the plan to Mr. H,^ "We called in the ^ Mr. II., however, seems not to have regarded it with favor, for the funds in his hands were never obtained. 14 THE UNION THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY. counsel of R. T. Haines, Wm. M. Halsted, and perhaps C. O. Halsted. The result was the determination to raise $75,000, that is, 115,000 a year for five years, as an experiment ; and if, at the end of this time, the experiment was not successful, then to close up, but if successful, to go on. Dr. Patton adds, that he personally secured 850,000 of the original subscription, by application to moneyed men, and by argument convincing them of the desira- bleness of the plan. To show his confidence in the scheme he himself subscribed $500. He was active also in all the early meetings ; his views were defi- nitely embodied in the preamble to the constitution of the Seminary, and for many years he was a most efficient member of its Board of Directors. Erskine Mason is the fourth name. His father was the renowned Dr. John M. Mason, the friend of Alex- ander Hamilton, an eminent divine, and one of the first pulpit orators of the age. To Erskine Mason, then thirty-one years old, was assigned the task of giving written expression to the views and aim of the founders of the Seminary. Nor was there, perhaps, another man in the Presbyterian Church better quali- fied for the task by training, solid sense, intelligent zeal for the cause of Christian truth and learning, freedom from theological partisanship, greatness of soul, and the habit of taking wide, far-reaching out- looks in the interest of the Gospel. Notwithstanding his modesty and reserve, he swayed men's minds alike by innate force of charac- FOUNDERS OF THE INSTITUTION. 15 ter and by the strength of his judgment. Such mas- ters in the law as Chancellor Kent and George Wood of New York, and Randall and Meredith of Pennsyl- vania, were glad to take counsel with him in the legal discussion and contest that followed the disruption; and there was no one, we are told, to whose advice they and his brethren paid so much of respectful deference. The preamble to our constitution, as I have intimated, was prepared by him ; and although aided in com- mittee by Drs. Patton, Peters, and White, and that ex- cellent layman, John Nitchie, it must yet be regarded as essentially his work. Its tone of wise moderation, its dignity and condensed vigor of thought and ex- pression, and its whole spirit, are characteristic of him. '' Nothing, my brethren, is great in this world but the kingdom of Jesus Christ : nothing but that, to a spir- itual eye, has an air of permanency." This grand sen- timent, uttered in one of his sermons, inspired him in setting forth the design of the new seminary. Such were the four ministers to whom we owe to- day so large a debt of grateful recognition. One of them was a native of New Hampshire, and one of Pennsylvania ; the other two were natives of New York. All four had pursued their theological studies at Princeton, either wholly or in part. Two of them were at the time pastors ; one, secretary of the Cen- tral American Education Society; another, secretary of the American Home Missionary Society ; while all were deeply imbued with the spirit of home and 16 THE UNION THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY. world-wide evangelism, which so signally marked the times. Associated with these eminent clergymen as found- ers of the Union Theological Seminary were some of the most prominent Christian laymen of New York and Brooklyn. Knowles Taylor stands first in the list. It is praise enough to say of him, that before reaching the age of thirty he had been an intimate friend and correspondent, as well as trusted counsellor, of Dr. John Holt Rice, of Virginia. Dr. Rice's memoir of his brother, James Brainerd Taylor, — a young man of extraordinary piety and zeal to win sods for Christ, — is doubtless known to many of you. Years before, Mr. Taylor had taken a lively interest in the Union Theological Seminary in Virginia, contrib- uting liberally toward its endowment, and becoming familiar, through the letters and conversation of Dr. Rice, with the claims and importance of such institu- tions. He was, I think, one of the founders, and almost from the first had been the treasurer of the American Home Missionary Society. The first formal meeting of those interested in the question of estab- lishing a theological seminary in New York, as we have seen, was held at his house. The name of Richard T. Haines follows that of Knowles Taylor. In mentioning this honored name, I am tempted to stop and ask myself the question, whether without Richard T. Haines the Union Theo- FOUNDERS OF THE INSTITUTIOX. 17 logical Seminary in New York would ever have ex- isted, — whether, at all events, it would have long continued to exist. And if the name of William M. Halsted be joined to his, the question would not be a fanciful one. These two noble men — partners in business and partners in the service of Christ — were pillars of strength to the infiint institution. As their liberality and wisdom helped to found it, so through years of poverty and trial they joined hands in sustaining it. They were among the most solid merchants of New York; their house remained up- right even amidst the financial cyclone of 1837; and the qualities that gave them their steadfast position in the mercantile world — the same persistent energy, prudence, and fidelity — were exercised in behalf of the Union Seminary. For thirty years Mr. Haines was President of its Board of Directors ; for five and thirty years one of its most judicious and efiicient friends. From the moment when Drs. Patton and Peters to- gether sought his counsel to the day of his death, his devotion to it knew no change except to grow stronger. Mr. Halsted was Treasurer of the Seminary from its beginning until 1845 ; and in this caj^acity watched over its interests as if they had been his own. Abijah Fisher was already well known in the re- ligious and benevolent circles of New York. From the first he was a Director of the Seminary, and as such rendered it faithfid service for nearly a quarter of a century. 18 THE UNION THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY. Marcus Wilbur was a warm-hearted Christian mer- chant, — an elder in the Bleecker Street Presbyterian Church. I have a pleasant remembrance of him as, twenty years later, my own parishioner and friend. But his connection with the founding of Union Semi- nary was very slight. His name occurs but once in its records. At the second meeting, when the two committees on the design and plan of instruction of the con- templated institution, and on its organization, were appointed, five additional laymen, as we have seen, took part in the proceedings. One of them, Fisher Howe, was a member of the Board of Directors from the beginning until his death, in 1871, — a period of thirty-five years. Tlie Seminary had no truer friend. In manifold ways he rendered it important service. He had the instincts of a scholar, and was in special sympathy with the spirit of investigation in all de- partments of Biblical study and research. Of liim, and of John Nitchie, James C. Bliss, and Cornelius Baker, I shall speak elsewhere. Lowell Holbrook appears to have taken no further part in the movement. I have briefly sketched the men who originated and planned this school of divinity. But it had still other founders, — tlie men who, approving of the plan, adopted it as their own and helped to carry it into efi'ect. This brings us to the organization and actual establishment of the Seminary. No sooner was the plan completed than other leading Presbyterian min- FOUNDERS OF THE INSTITUTION. 19 isters, tog-ether with other leading laymen of New York and Brooklyn, were invited to join in the move- ment. The most of them accepted the invitation, and were present at one or all of the next three meetings. Among' this number were such clergymen as Thomas McAuley, Thomas H. Skinner, Ichabod S. Spencer, William Adams, John C. Brlgham, Asa D. Smith, and Henry Gr. Ludlow ; and such laymen as Charles But- ler, Caleb 0. Halsted, John L. Mason, Norman White, and Anson G. Phelps. At the fourth meeting, held on November 3, after a free interchange of views, it was again '' Resolved unanimously that it is expedient, depending on the blessing of God, to attempt to establish a theological seminary in this city." At this meeting the committee on organization was empowered to nominate suitable persons for directors of the new institution. At the fifth meeting, held on November 9, the re- port of the committee on the best mode of organizing a Board of Directors having been made and adopted, the following clergymen, nominated by this committee, were elected Directors ; namely, Thomas McAuley, Thomas H. Skinner, Henry Wliite, E. Mason, I, S. Spencer, Absalom Peters, William Patton, William Adams, E. P. Barrows, H. A. Rowland, W. W. Phillips, and John Woodbridge. Drs. Phillips and Woodbridge declined ; all the rest accepted. At this same meeting the Committee of Ways and Means reported that '' the establishment of the Semi- 20 THE UNION THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY. nary would involve an expense of $65,000, or $13,000 per annum for five years, supporting during that period all the Professors, and at its expiration leaving a building and a library entirely free from debt." A subscription paper was thereupon presented to the meeting, and the sum of $31,000 was subscribed. At the sixth meeting, held on November 16, Dr. Gardiner Spring, pastor of the Brick Church, then in the height of his influence and usefulness, was elected a Director ; but after attending the next meeting, he declined the appointment. The following laymen were also elected; namely, Knowles Taylor, R T. Haines, William M. Halsted, Micah Baldwin, Cornelius Baker, Charles Butler, John Nitchie, Fisher Howe, Joseph Otis, Leonard Corning, and Abijah Fisher. Later, Caleb 0. Halsted, Pelatiah Perit, and Zechariah Lewis were added to the number. These ten clergymen and fourteen laymen constituted the first Board of Directors ; no others were appointed until 1837. IV. THE SEMIXARY EQUIPPED AND OPENED FOR INSTRUCTION. ITS EARLY TRIALS AND STRUGGLE FOR EXISTENCE. One of the most interesting documents in our ar- chives is the original subscription-book. The first four names are Knowles Taylor, William M. Halsted, Richard T. Haines, and Cornelius Baker, against each ITS EQUIPMENT AND OPENING. 21 of which stands the sum of $5,000, — a hirge sum in those days. Other names follow, that were widely known and honored then, and some of which are far more widely known and honored now ; such names as Charles N. Talbot, S. S. Howland, George and Na- thaniel Griswold, Russell H. and Rufus Nevins, Anson G. Pheli^s, William E. Dodge, Charles Butler, Thomas H. Skinner, Henry White, William Patton, George P. Shipman, W. AV. Chester, Norman White, P. Perit, F. Howe, David Leavitt, Leonard and Jasper Corning, John G. Nelson, Gurdon Buck, L. Holbrook, T. Mc- Auley, Joseph Otis, John L. Mason, Z. Lewis, E. W. Morgan, Alfred Edwards, G. T. Robhins, Abijali Fisher, Frederick N. Marquand, and Joseph Brewster. The subscriptions were to be binding upon reaching $60,000. Fifty thousand dollars had been secured when the great fire occTUTed, on the night of De- cember 16, 1835, by which more than five hundred buildings in the wealthiest section of the town and $17,000,000 of property were destroyed. In spite of this appalling calamity the steadfast purpose of the founders remained unshaken. At a meeting held on January 11, 1836, the Committee of Ways and Means reported: "Notwithstanding the late calamity which has befallen our city in the destruction of so large an amount of property by fire, the subscription in aid of the Seminary is now binding, amounting to the sum of $61,000." On the evening of January 18, 1836, the first meet- 22 THE UNION THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY. ing of the Board of Directors was held at the house of tlie American Tract Society, in Nassau Street. At this meeting- it perfected its own organization by the choice of officers for the year, appointed its committees, and proceeded forthwith to business. The name of the new institution was "The New York Theological Seminary." Of the measures which were taken to give it a "local habitation," I borrow the following interesting account from Dr. Hatfield's Early Annals of Union Theological Seminary, published in 1876. A plot of ground, two hundred feet square, between Sixth and Eighth Streets, extending from Greene to Wooster Streets, four full lots on each street, was selected. It formed a part of the property of " the Sailors' Snug Harbor," which shortly before had been located in the old Randall mansion on Broad- way, above Ninth Street. It was subject to an annual ground- rent of eight hundred dollars. The lease was purchased for eight thousand dollars. The locality was well up town, quite on the outskirts of the city. Population had been speeding from what was then familiarly known as Greenwich Village, along the Hudson River, northward ; and, in like manner, along the Third Avenue, on the eastern side of the city. A few improvements had been made along the Bloomingdale Road from its junction with the Bowery Road, at Seventeenth Street, to the House of Refuge, which stood at the starting- point of the old Boston Road, on the westerly side of the present Madison Square, extending to the present Broadway, and covering the site of the Worth Monument. Union Place, now Union Square, had just been opened, at the forks of Broadway and the Bowery, but was still unimproved. Eighth Street, and a few of the parallel streets above, opened but a few years before, were beginning to exhibit some evidences of ITS EQUIPMENT AND OPENING. 23 substantial improvement. With these exceptions, vacant lots, unpaved streets, primitive roads and lanes, open fields, and country seats, many of them highly cultivated and of con- siderable extent, covered the island to the north, as far as the ancient Dutch village of Harlem. The New York of tluit day scarcely extended above Tenth Street, the original termi- nus of Broadway. Beyond was the open country. The General Theological Seminary of the Protestant Epis- copal Church, some ten years before, had been erected far out of the city, and near it, on Twentieth Street, an Episco- pal chapel (St. Peter's) of small capacity had been erected in 1832. Old " St. Mark's " occupied its present site on Tenth Street, near Second Avenue. Two or three mission stations, in advance of the population, were struggling for a foothold in the outlying districts. Excepting these, not a church edifice of any description was to be found on the island, below the villages of Bloomingdale and Harlem, above Tenth Street. A new Presbyterian church had just been erected in Mercer Street, near Eighth Street, which for many subsequent years was the " Up-town Church " of the denomi- nation. The stately structure erected for the University of the City of New York, on the block below the new purchase, had just been occupied in part, but was not fully completed. Wooster Street had just been extended to Fourteenth Street, and the part above the University widened and called Jackson Avenue, — a name shortly after exchanged for University Place. The location was deemed quite eligible, near enough to the business portion of the city, and sufficiently remote for a quiet literary retreat. The next step was to secure a permanent corps of instructors. For the chair of Theology the Rev. Justin Edwards, D. D., was chosen ; and for the chair of Biblical Literature, Prof. Joseph Addison 24 THE UNION THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY. Alexander, of Princeton. Both appointments were declined. The Rev. Henry \Yhite, pastor of the Al- len Street Church, was then called to the Theological chair ; and Dr. Thomas McAuley to that of Pastoral Theology and Church Government, with the position of President of the institution. The chair of Biblical Literature was now offered to Prof. George How, of the Tlieological Seminary at Columbia, S. C. ; and upon his declining, Edward Robinson, D. D., formerly of Andover, Mass., received and accepted the ap- pointment. Several clerical members of the Board consented to act as Professors Extraordinary. Late in November, the recorder was authorized to announce to the public that on Monday, the 5tli of December, 1836, the Seminary would be opened for instruction. On tliat day, accordingly, thirteen young men ap- peared at the house of the President, No. 112 Leonard Street, and were duly enrolled as students of divinity. For two years the institution was necessarily more or less "peripatetic." "Now," says Dr. Hatfield, "the young gentlemen are seen Avending their way to the house of the President, in Leonard Street; the day following they have gathered at the residence of Prof. White, No. 80 Eldridge Street; the third dny finds them at the rooms of the Presbyterian Education Society, No. 116 Nassau Street, drinking in the erudi- tion of Prof. Robinson ; or, in his absence, profiting by the genial instructio.ns of the scholarly George Bush, at his study, No. 115 Nassau Street; and again ITS EQUIPMENT AND OPENING. 25 they are to be found g-atliered about tlie polished and enthusiastic Skinner, in his quiet retreat in the chapel of the Mercer Street Church." But, in spite of these disadvantages, ten additional students were enrolled in the course of the first year. At the close of the second year fifty-six names were on the Seminary roll. At the opening- of the third year, the catalogue, now for the first time printed, showed a total of ninety-two students, thirty-two of them Juniors. Thus in about three j^ears from the earliest meeting at the house of Knowles Taylor, October 10, 1835, the new Seminary had grown into the third institution of its kind in the land, only Ando- ver and Princeton outranking it. Sudden growth, however, is not always healthy growth. The Union Seminary owes, perhaps, quite as much to the sharp trials as to the brilliant success which attended its early years. Let us dwell a little here u^^on these trials. They were such, essentially, as almost always mark the beginning of a great work for Christ and the Church. Bitter as they were at the time, we can now look back upon them as a wholesome discipline to the youthful institution. Dr. Hatfield thus refers to them : — The plans having at length been completed and approved, contracts were made for the erection of a Seminary building on University Place, and of four Professors' houses in the rear, on Greene Street. Early in March, 1836, the work was fairly begun, but with utterly inadequate resources. The original 26 THE UNION THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY. subscription liad reached nearly seventy thousand dollars ; but the first instalment, payable June 1, 1836, had yielded scarcely more than ten thousand dollars, four fifths of which had been required for the purchase of the lease ; the ground rent and assessments absorbed nearly three fourths of the small re- mainder, leaving almost no provision for the payment of the salaries of the three Professors, the purchase of books, and other current expenses. The great fire had crippled quite a number of the patrons of the Seminary, and the prospects for the second instalment, in June, 1837, were anything but promising. Whence were the funds for building purposes to be derived ? Only from loans. Further subscriptions, to any considerable extent, were out of the question. The times were now adverse in the extreme for new enterprises. Mr. Van Burcn had just succeeded to the Presidency. The excit- ing era of land speculations had come to an end. The com- monwealth of trade and commerce had lost confidence in the policy of the general government. Credit was destroyed. Trade was prostrate. The great manufactories were sus- pended. The demand for labor ceased. An era of bank- ruptcy set in. Merchants and bankers, after a while, yielded to the storm. House after house went down in hopeless ruin. A tremendous panic ensued. The land was convulsed. Every bank in the city of New York on the 10th of May, and immediately after every bank in the land, suspended specie payments. It was no time to borrow, no time to build. It is not strange, therefore, that the Directors of the Seminary resolved, April 26, 1837, " to suspend the erection of the buildings until they shall possess the means which will en- courage them to resume the task." As if to add to the dis- tractions of the times and the embarrassments of the Board, the Presbyterian General Assembly, at its meeting in May, at Philadelphia, was led into heated and angry discussions, and convulsed with party strife. The excision of a portion of its constituency scattered the brands of discord all over the land, UNION THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY. UNIVERSITY PLACE. EARLY TRIALS. 27 kindling the flames of contention throughout the denomina- tion. ... It was a year of deep discouragement, and passed away with but little relief. The second instalment of the sub- scription had produced less than eight thousand dollars, and the prospects for the following year were even less hopeful. From two of the warm friends of the Seminary, however, at the close of the year, loans amounting to twenty-seven thousand dollars, secured by mortgage on the grounds and prospective buildings, were obtained, and the work of con- struction resumed.^ It is worthy of note, that during this period of financial disaster and discouragement the invaluable Van Ess Library, of which I shall speak later, was purchased. The new Seminary building was dedicated, with approj^riate ceremonies, December 12, 1838. On the 27th of March, 1839, the Legislature passed an act incorporating the institution under the name of The Union Theological Seminary in the City of New York.^ The institution entered upon its fourth year by en- rolling fifty -five new students, the most of whom had 1 The Early Annals of Union Theological Seminary, pp. 12, 13. 2 Dr. Hatfield thinks that this name was "given it at Albany, to dis- tinguish it, jirobably, f rom the Episcopal Seminary of Twentieth Street, — a name not desired, much less chosen, by the Board, but prophetic of the position that the institution has ever since maintained." Dr. Hitchcock, on the other hand, in his Dedicatory Address, in 1884, expressed the opin- ion that it was sent up from New York, and "was meant to be a monu- mental protest against the unhappy rending of the Presbyterian Church in 1837, as also both a prayer and a prophecy against it." I am myself also of the opinion that the name originated with the founders; and, fur- ther, that it was suggested by that of the Union Theological Seminary in Virginia, which some of them were familiar with and had helped to establish. 28 THE UNION THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY. to be provided with lodgings outside of the Seminary building. This was beyond the strongest hopes of its friends. Nobody could now say that New York was not at least a very attractive place to young men pre- paring for the sacred office. But while the number of students who flocked to the Seminary surpassed the largest expectation of its founders, tlie latter found themselves wholly at fault in their financial plan and arrangements. Not more than fifty thou- sand dollars of the original subscription had proved available, while more than this amount had been expended at the end of the tliird year of instruc- tion. It was necessary, therefore, to resort to loans, for which not only the buildings, but the Van Ess Library, were mortgaged. The last instalment of tlie subscription would hardly suffice to meet the current expenses, and for the 3'ears beyond no provision what- ever had been made. In this exigency the Board of Directors appointed a financial agent, and then, call- ing together the pastors of the city and vicinity who were in sympatliy w^ith the movement, invited them to open to him their pulpits and to aid him in soliciting funds. They resolved to do so, and in the course of the winter a fruitless attempt was made to raise fifty thousand dollars. By February, 1840, the Treasurer, William M. Halsted, had advanced over and above the loans more than sixteen thousand dollars, while eight thousand five hundred dollars had been re- ceived from the sale of one of the four Professors' EARLY TRIALS. 29 houses. So dark was the prospect, that even the ques- tion of abandoning- the enterprise beg-an to be agi- tated; and had not its friends been men of stron