THE LIBRARY OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA RIVERSIDE li ■^r- !-S'i '^y^'v:: 1 ^ ▼ ■ ■ Ex Libris : c. K. OGDEN v^ ^': -^'> f?^? ■si:.. i:M.:'^;;:5f ;:r ■■•■ ..'vV--'..- •'■ 'i;'V:; f*;^- "t-" lA" y. m ^;-^ .J'^ ;& /^i 'iw- [.'>•' THE QUEEN OF NAPLES AND LORD NELSON. VOL. 1. THE QUEEN OF NAPLES AND LORD NELSON AN HISTORICAL BIOGRAPHY BASED ON MSS. IN THE BRITISH MUSEUM AND ON LETTERS AND OTHER DOCUMENTS PRESERVED AMONGST THE MORRISON MSS. BY JOHN CORDY lEAFFRESON AUTHOR OF •the real lord BYRON,' 'LAUY HAMILTON AND LORD NELSON,' ETC., ETC. IN TWO VOLS.— VOL. L LONDON : HURST AND BI^ACKETT, LIMITED, 13, GRE.VT .MARLnOROUGH STREET. 1889. /ill Rij^hts Kcicncd. D&S4-8.37 V. i r>^ INTRODUCTORY NOTE. The writiug's poiuted to by the title of this work as ' MSS. ill the British Museum ' are (a) Lord Valentia's ' Private Journal of the Affairs of Sicily, 1811-12,' (b) the large Collectiou of Letters by Maria Caroline to Lady Hamilton, from which Dr. Petti- grew drew the eighty letters published in English in his ' Life of Nelson,' and Monsieur Gagniero took the forty-eight letters publislied in his ' La Reine Marie-Caroline De Naples, Lady Hamilton Et Nelson,' and (c) Letters and other writings by Emma Hamil- ton, including the notes and memoranda which slie put on the envelopes of the letters written to her by the Queen. The maiuiscripts spoken of in the same title as ' Letters and other Documents preserved amongst the Morrison MSS.,' are the multifarious writings of the large body of Nelson-Hamilton papers, that came into the possession of ilr. Alfred Morrison nf/rr T had writ- ten 'Lady Hamilton and Lord Nelson.' These manu- scripts comprise (a) the original of Nelson's famous ' Now, my own dear Wife ' letter, (/>) the main body (ifthi- oi'iginals of the NelsDii-IIainilfdii letters, in- cluding Nelson's indisputably authentic TlHtmson- letters, which Dr. Pettigrew used in the composition of his ' Life of Nelson,' (r) several letters wj-itteri by Mrs. Cadogan to her celel^rated ring — The Empress- Queen an admirable ]\Iother — Education of her Children — Its Results — Joseph II., I]mperor of Germanj' — His Services to Humanity — -Leopold, Grand Duke of Tuscany — His beneficent Government of his Tuscan Dominions — ]\laria Caroline's Influence over Ferdinand of Naples — Colletta's testimony to the Virtues of Maria Theresa's ' whole Proj^eny' — Fruits of ]\Iaria Caroline's Influence over her Husband — Field of Conjecture — Marie-Antoinette's Fate — Its Effect on her posthumous Fame. CHAPTER II. Less for Love than Power . . . .71 From ChildhoofI to AVomanly Plstate — Charles Bourbon's Accession to the Throne of Spain — Dynastic Arran^^eiuents — Ferrlinand of Naples — Council of Regency — Bernardo, Marquis of Tanucci — His clever Management of the Council — Superlative Disinterestwlness of (Jharles Bourljon — ' Register that ring I' — The Boy-King's Tutor — Tanucci's Craft and Charles's Policy — Muscular Education and Mental Neglect — The r»oy-King becomes a mighty Hunter — GooJAND IV. AND I. OF Till', TwO SiGILIES . 00 Meeting at Portelia — Amalia \Valliurga of I'oland — M.iria Caroline's striking Rescmljlance to Mari«'-Antoinctte — Tlie Mar- chioness Soiari on the two Queens — Ferdinand's personal Appear- X CONTENTS. ance — His Voice of Pleasure — From Portella to Caserta — Ferdi- nand's Delight in practicul Jokes — An yl 6tt tossed in a Blanket — Meetings of the Liparotii — Regimental ' High-Jinks ' — Ferdi- nand the Sutler — Maria Caroline the Cantineer — Pranks with the Lazzaroni — Hercules throwing Lichas into the Sea — Ferdinand the Fishmonger — A Marchioness in the Shambles — Lazzaroni at San Carlo — The Macaroni Scramble — Ferdinand and his Peasants — Bread and Onions — Three Boys at a Birth — Parental Kespon- sibility — Sir John Acton's 'good sort of ]\Ian' — The Bishop of Cefalu's Testimony to Ferdinand's religious Merit — Lord Valentia on the King's submissiveness to the Divine Will — Ferdinand's social Gifts and Accomplishments — He dances well and ' sings like a King ' — Ferdinand at the Whist-Table. 17G8 A.D. CHAPTER IV. From the Royal Marrlvge to Tanucci's Fall 106 From Caserta to Naples — Tanucci studies INIaria Caroline — A Beautiful Hand — Ferdinand, Husband and Lover — Tanucci's Uneasiness — Arch-Duke Leopold at Naples — Joseph II. visits his Sister — Maria Caroline's preliminary Measures — Former Posses- sions of the banished Jesuits — Queen's Management of Ferdinand — Her Consideration for his Feelings — Her genuine Admiration of him — Her Care to prevent Occasions for Contention — Ferdi- nand's occasional Freaks of ^Vilfulness — INLaria Caroline's disap- pointed Hopes — Consequences of her Heirlessness — Her LiHuence in Politics — Ferdinand's 'Xay'and royal "Will — Gaetano Filan- gieri — The Heir comes at last — Maria Caroline's last Quarrel with Tanucci — The Ministers P'all — How it strikes Naples — Tanucci's Death. 17G8— 1777 A.D. CHAPTER V. Reigning King and Ruling Queen . . .121 The Queen rules — Her Absolutism— Qualified by Ferdinand's Freaks — CoUetta on Maria Caroline's foreign Policy — Emma Hamilton's droll Fancies — The Queen's Coteries — Philosophers of Middle Age — Youthful 'J liinkers — Galanti and Mario Pagano — Galliani and Filangieri — Palmieri and Cirillo — Pagano's Execu- tion — Dominico Cirillo's Fate — ^laria Caroline's Patronage of Gaetano Filangieri — Her Care for Filangieri's Children — Her Ministers and Advisers — Marquis della Sambuca — Marquis Car- acciolo — Prince Caramanico — John Acton the brilliant Adven- CONTENTS. xi turer — His Extraordinary Career — He is invited to Naples — Be- comes Maria Caroline's prime Minister — ' Hsec Kex, hie Kejiina, hie hfec et hoc Acton ' — Libels on Acton — Causes of his Influence vith the Queen — New Neapolitan Fleet — Re-organization of Neapolitan Army — Charles III. advises that Acton should be dis- missed — Maria Caroline's Wrath — Employment of Foreign Officers — Colletta on Acton's Fleet — His Strictures on Acton's Army — Discontent of Soldiers — Signs of Mutiny — Beginning of the Queen's Unpopularity — Jealousies of noble Subalterns — Earth- quake and Pestilence — Emperor Joseph's second Visit to Naples — Sir "William Hamilton's Trip to England — ' The fair Tea- maker of Paddington Green.' 1777—1784 A.D. CHAPTER VI. The Goldex Tour 139 Ships and ]\Ien — !Maria Caroline visits her Neighbours — The Fleet and the Holiday- ^Makers — From Naples to Leghorn — Bridge-Tournament at Pi.^a — King and Grand Duke — ]\Iaria Caroline averts the Storm — Northward to I\Iilan — Koumling southward by Turin to Genoa — 'ilie Fleet in Harbour — A larger Armament — Homeward bound — Bill for Four Montlis' Touring — A Million Ducats — The Golden King — Maria Caroline in her Glory — Seen at her best — Her highest Felicity — Sovereign, Wife and Mother — Her two Amliitions. 1785 A.D. CIIArTEU VII. The Story of an Adventuress . . . 146 An Arrival at Naples— Tlirec Travellers— Date of Amy LyoTi's P)irth— Mary Lyon nflrrwanls Cadogan— Amy's ^^'ildn(■.ss -Birth of her first Cliild— Wilder yet, and wilder !— Sir Harry Feihenstonehaugh— ' The fine Line'— Henry Angelo's ' Kemin- iscencci ' — Mr. (Jharles Francis Grcvilh!— l'a — His Courage in acting upon Orders. Receiving from my coiTL'spoudonts .sc\ural pieces of information respecting Emma Hamilton, I also learnt a few things about Nelson from tlw documents wliicli they were so good as to send or l)riiig to me. After wilting to mo <»n the subject, one gentleman lirou,i;lit to me a document, proving that on bringing little Horatia 'for good ' to Morton Place, L:iily Hamilton was authorized by Nelson to represent to his and her friends that she was 7wt Iloratia's mother, and that he also bore testimony that the little girl was the orphan child of some other woman than Lady Ham- iltfjii. This writing was the document, known to the inmost ring of Nelsom'an specialists as 'the blind,' even as the one Thomson letter, of which Professor 12 THE QUEEN OF NAPLES Lmighton remarked that it 'would be conclusive if its authenticity were established,' has long been known to all Nelsonian controversialists as the ' Now, my own dear Wife ' letter. It was also my good fortune to be permitted to examine a small collection of Nelsonian documents and relics that had been for many years in Horatia's possession, when she gave them to the gentleman who brought them to me. This geutleman was, of course, one of that lady's intimate friends. Notwith- standing their friendship, it is surprising that the lady, who was no less proud of her descent from Nelson than reluctant to acknowledge her descent from Lady Hamilton, parted with such interesting items of her domestic muniments. As it was written from sea, one of the documents may have been written in duplicate, and botli drafts may in course of time have come to Mrs. Ward's liands. It is con- ceivable that, whilst giving away the one draft, she kept the other in her possession. To me these writings were more interesting than serviceable. No use is made of their contents in the present work. But I think it right to record that in her later time Mrs. Ward was capable of thus parting with Nelson- ian memorials ; because the fact is one of my reasons for thinking it more proljable that the body of evi- dence, with which Mrs. Ward used to support 'her case,' became weaker than that it became stronger in her later time. Since the publication of ' Lady Hamilton and Lord Nelson,' I have also enlarged mj' knowledge of both those famous persons by a careful and thorough study AND LOUD NELSON. 13 of a body of Nelsonian MSS., that were no part of the Monison MSS. when I was writing that book and passing it through the press, and also by a similar examination of the documents of a single book of Nelsonian MSS., which, though they had been for some time in Mr. Morrison's possession, did not come under my observation till long after the publication of my memoir of the famous beauty. That this par- ticular set of documents escaped my notice, whilst I was working on my book, is referable to a temporary withdrawal of the volume from the owner's collection of personal writings. When he invited me to carry off from his house an enormous package of Hamilton- Greville records, in order that I should examine them inider the most agreeable circumstances in my own study, it escaped Mr. Morrison's recollection that this one volume had already been lent by him to another student. Hence this particular letter-book did not come to my knowledge till my memoir of Nelson's Lady Hamilton had been for several weeks in the pu])lic ]il)rarics. This particular letter-book would not have helped mo much in the composition of * Lady Hamilton and Lord Nelson.' Consequently, when it at length came to my hands, I felt httlo regret at not having seen it sooner. The case was different in respect to another collecticm of Nelsonian evidences, comprising all the ' Thomson letters ' published in Pettigrew'e ' Life of Nelson,' which did not como into Mr. ]\Iorri8on'H pos- session till several niMnths had passed since the manuscript of my memoir of Emma Hamilton was given to the printers. Could I liavc only gained a 14 THE QUEEN OF NAPLES view of the Pettigrew-Nelson MSS. before setting to work ou that biography, I should have produced a more effective book, and have produced it with little more than half the labour spent upon the published work. Instead of elaborating with much care a somewhat prolix demonstration of Horatia's maternal parentage, I should have settled the question with a stroke of the pen. Able to certify that Pettigrew's * Thomson letters ' were impcachably authentic, and that all the scandalous suspicions of the doctor's good faith had been utterly exploded by the recovery of the original epistles, I should have spared myself a vast amount of argumentative trouble, and have produced the writings, whose genuineness ought never to have been doubted, given to the public as they were by so sufficient a judge of Nelson's pen- manship and so honest a man of letters as Dr. Puttigrew. But though the Nelsonian MSS., to which I have had access for the first time since the publication of ' Lady Hamilton and Lord Nelson,' have enlarged my knowledge of both of those remarkable persons, they brought to light no single inaccuracy in any of the important* statements of my book. On the contrary-, they have afforded additional evidence in support of those statements, and have confirmed me in all my judgments of the two individuals. It is certain that, till she fell imder the baneful * That Emma Hamilton died in the Catholic faith, and was buried with the Catholic rite, can scarcely be deemed matters of importance; and, before submitting Mrs. Hunter's testimony on these points to the reader, 1 was at pains to warn him that the lady was far from a reliable witness. AND LORD NELSON. 15 influence of the man who seduced her, Emma Hamil- ton was what is ordinarily understood by the words ' a good girl," when they are applied to a young maid-servant; — that the immediately ensuing period of her wildness and flagrant naughtiness, during which she encom-aged several idolaters, lived with Sir Harry Fetherstonehaugh, and probably figured as Hygiea in Graham's lecture-room, cannot have much exceeded two years, and certainly was less than two years and a half; — that there is uo evidence (old Henry Angelo's senile gabble is uo evidence what- ever, except testimony to his own folly) of her ever having fallen so low as to be even for twenty-four hours 'a girl of the pavement' ; — that the term of her (.'xtreme naughtiness was followed by a term of what may at least be designated as domestic orderliness, during which her daily haljits and pursuits and l)leasures would not have misbeseemed a young gentlewoman ; — that after regarding him with grati- tude rath(;r than Idvc she conceived l"i>r Mr. Greville a pure affection ; — that she was loyally and strongly attaclied to him (albeit she was only his ringless bride) when at his desire and in his interest, no less than for lier own educational advancement, she went for the first time; from London to Najiles; — that on so going to Naples, after living with In'iii happily for four years, she fully believed Mr. Greville would come out to her there in six or seven months, and was wholly without suspicion of his resolve to be hence- forth (piit of her; — that after vainly endeavouring to recover Mr. Greville to her heart, and then reluctant- ly yielding to Sir William Hamilton's addresses, sho 16 THE QUEEN OF NAPLES lived five years in Italy so as to win the affection and esteem of her Neapolitan acquaintances^ although she was only Sir William's ' mistress ;' — and that after becoming the Britisli ambassador's wife in September, 1791, she at least for seven years justified his un- qualified submission to her influence by being (so far as evidence goes) true in every particular to her nuptial vows. Having proved all these points in my last book, in order to show that Nelson should be ac- quitted of the shameful weakness of surrendering himself to the fascinations of a flagrantly wanton and openly vicious woman, I now entreat my readers to bear all these points in mind, so that they maybe the better able to take a fair and justly sympathetic view of Maria Caroline of Naples. Supporting all that I have urged in behalf of Emma Hamilton, Mr. Morrison's recently acquired Nelsonian MSS., to which I have given due attention during the last year, are no less confirmatory of all my main statements respecting Nclson^s attachment to the surpassingly beautiful woman. Though Nelson did not make his second trip to the Nile with- out declaring to Lady Hamilton his admiration of her charms in terms that were at least prophetic of his eventual enthralment, it is certain that there was no liaison between them before the Battle of Aboukir. The very terms of this too fervid declaration of afiection for her and her husband show clearly that the strenuous utterance had been preceded by no similar outpouring of perilous emotion. That he returned from the Nile a worshipper of the woman, whose feelings overpowered her in so AND LORD NELSOX. 17 remarkable a manner at the very moment of their re- union on the Vanguard, is unquestionable. Young Josiah Nesbitt had probably some good grounds for uneasiness, though no sufficient excuse for his out- break of bad manners, at the famous birthday fete. But Nelson was not a man to jdeld to the temptation without first making many efforts to resist it. More- over, words of tender record put it beyond question that in his later time the Admiral used to reflect on the memoraljle pleasure-trip from Palermo to Malta and back to the Sicilian port, as the time when fate converted what might have been a transient passion iuto an enduring attachment. These admissions, it is needless to say, have no effect on the considerations and arguments, that wliolly acquit Nelson of the charges preferred against his honour and humanity by Sourhey and AHson. The Admiral's action in 1798 and 1799 towards Naples and Their Majesties of the two Sicilies was iu no way influenced by his passion for Emma Hamilton. He had Ijccn especially commissioned by the British Government and ordered by his commander-in-chief to fight the French in the Mediterranean and take the crown and court of Naples under his especial protection. In liastcning back from Aboukir to Naples ho only did as he was ordered. In i)rovidiug for the safety of Ferdinand and Maria Carcjlinc, ho only cxecutefl the commauds of his sovereign and country. In nullifying tlie infamous treaty for the capitulation of the Castles Uovo and Nuovo ho only oboyod the spirit of his orders, and did his duty with characteristic fearlessness and at the same time witli VOL. I. C 18 THE QUEEN OF NAPLES dae regard for international law. He exercised a wise discretion and betrayed no lack of humanity in sending the treacherous Caracciolo before the Sicilian court-martial, which justly sentenced him to death. Had he never set eyes on Emma Hamilton, had she never been born, he would have done his utmost to crush the Parthenopeian republic, drive the remnant of the French garrisons from Neapolitan territory, extinguish the power of the French Directory in Naples, and re-establish Ferdinand's authority in the portion of his dominions, that at the instigation of France and by means of French arms had defeated his sway for a time. Had Emma Hamilton's place in the political drama been filled by some other subordinate actor, some instrument whom he regarded with indifference or even with aversion, Nelson would all the same have done his utmost for these ends, and done it with all possible promptitude, so that, after setthng the French question on land, he should be free to con- centrate all his intellect and energies on the destruc- tion of the great French fleet, which he had reason to believe was moving swiftly towards him. In these days of the telegraph and swift steam-vessels, an English admiral commanding a squadron in the Mediterranean, under circumstances similar to those that tested Nelson's capacity in 1798 — 9, would of course be in constant communication with London, — would at each new turn of events and each fresh crisis send along the electric wires to the Admiralty requests for further instructions. But in Nelson's time, AND WED NELSON. 19. our naval commanders engaged in operations remote from London were charged with the responsibiKty of acting upon the spirit as well as the words of their wintten orders, under emergencies that were un- imagined when the orders were committed to paper. It is pleasant and easy work for ingenious journal- ists, sitting in judgment upon Nelson in this year of grace, to survey the temis of his original orders, and after deliberating on their phrases with nice critical acumen to decide, whether he acted well witliin the words in this particular or exceeded the exact force of the words in another particular, or to declare that he should have waited for further instructions from home, before presuming to do this or that on his own rosponsibihty. What would have happened in the MeditciTanean in the summer of 171)9, had the Eng- lish admiral hesitated to annul the scandalous capitu- lation of the castles, and folding his arms waited for orders from homo ? Wliat might not have occurred in the meanwhile, had he given the Neapohtan Jaco- bins time to communicate with Paris aiid allowed the French captains of the Neapolitan forts to draw u French fleet and army to their n.-lief, before doing his best to extinguish the French-Italian republic, and send the French captains and their compatriots back to la helle France? What wcMild have come of it, had Nelson throughout his career lacked the courage to act on the spirit of his orders, when their preciso words fell short of tho requirements of sudden and un-anticipated emergencies ? Just this. Long sinco ho would have become au unrcmembcred namo even vol. i. c 2 2a THE QUEEN OF NAPLES m his own native village, and England wonld have never had his victories. He would have died a retired captain on half-pay, and Great Britain would never have received from his beneficent hands that supremacy over the seas, which makes us still the greatest of all the great powers of the universe. AXD LORD NELSON. 21 CHAPTER III. MURMURIXGS OF MALCONTENTS. Renewal of Labour — Evidence of Horatia's maternal Parentage — Distasteful to her Descendants — Mr. Paget, the Blackwood Essaj'ist — Death of the Rev. Horatio Nelson Nelson -Ward —Obituary Notice in 7'he Times— Letter by ' H.II.E. N.-W.' to The Times — Mr. Edward 'W^alford's Note on the Indignant Letter — Slight Slips and grave Errors of the Indignant Letter — Mr. Haslewood, whilom Solicitor of Craven Street, Strand — Slightnes.s of his Friendship with Lord Nelson — Fanciful Statements made by Mr. Haslewood in his old Agt' — His feeble Letter to Mrs. Ward (Horatia) — Influence of the 'Thomson Fictions' Discernible in the Letter — Use made of the Letter by Mr. Paget — Lady Hamilton's several Admissions of being Horatia's Mother — Family Sensitiveness and historic Justice. On piittiug the last touches to my elaboratu dciiion- stration that Iloratia Nelson was Lady llainilton'B daughter,* I hoped that 1 .shoukl never again be required to deal with the subject. Not that the examination of the evidences touching Horatia's birth was repugnant to my sense of delicacy; imr ilia< 1 shrinik from th(; thought of again shocking tlio American lady who is known to blush whenever she is confronted by the naked truth, and who seized the earliest opportunity to reprove me in one of the Loudon evening papers for nrgmng the case with • Vide, Append!:^ to ' Lady Hamilton and Lord Nelson,' vol. ii, pp. ■d.ii—oiO. 22 THE QUEEN OF NAPLES significant ' gusto ' ; nor that I feared any consider- able portion of my readers would concur with the proverbial American lady in thinking Iloratia's parent- age too indelicate a question to be discussed in pages, designed for the general reading of men and women. Fortunately for literature, though we English are not wanting in true delicacy and wholesome regard for the social proprieties, we regard exhibitions of false shame and prudery as 'bad form.' I had no fear that general opinion would cry ' fie !' upon me for assuming that Horatia had a mother, and for doing my best, in Nelson's interest, to prove that the mother could be no other person than the woman whose secret relation to his offspring gave her so strong a hold on his affectionate nature. But when a man conceives himself to have done a piece of work thoroughly, he does not care to be called upon to do it more effectually. Hence my hope that I should not be required to reconsider and reargue the ques- tion of Horatia's parentage. The hope has been disappointed. One of Horatia's descendants having recently declared in 77ie Times newspaper (vide, ' The Times' of the 29th of March, 1888) that the question of her maternal parentage ' can never be settled with any certainty,' and Mr. Paget, the well-known Blackwood essayist, having still more recently {vide, ' Blackwood's Magazine ' of May, 1888) declared tliat ' the vexed question as to the maternity of Horatia .... will probably remain for ever one of those questions on which the evidence on each side, when taken alone, appears absolutely conclusive, until it is met by the contrary e^adence, AND LORD NELSON. 23 Avhich seems equally so,' I am compelled (not by any desire for a barren controversial victory, but by a sincere sense of literary duty, and by desire to render some service to Nelson's reputation, and a very important service to the fame of the slandered Maria Caroline of Naples) to prove conclusively, by the production of further evidence on both sides of the case, that Horatia was Lady Hamilton's daughter, and therefore cannot have been the daughter of any other woman. Readers will hke to have at hand the particulars of the controversial matter that appeared in The Times on this subject in the spring of last year. In the March of that year, Horatia's eldest son, the late Rev. Horatio Nelson Ward, died after having held the rectory of Radstock co. Somerset for thirty- five years. This gentleman's death was noticeil 1)y The Times in the following terms : •The Rev. Horatio Nelson AVard, for tliirty-fivo years Rector of Radstock, Somerset, whose death we liave to record, was the son of tlie late Rev. Philip Ward, of Tenterden, Kent: his mother was the "little Horatia," whom J»rd Nelson, at his death, liefjiieatluMl to the care f)f the nation, whether .she was his natural dau;;ht<'r Ity Emma Lady Hamilton, or the dauf^htcr of Lady Hamilton by one of her former admirers, and hia adopted rhihl. in any case, whoever m.iy have lieen her fatiier, when she grew up she married Mr. IMiilij* "Ward, and the {gentleman now deceased was her eldest Hon. He was educalcd at Pemhroke College, Caiiil)rid;,'e, where he t 34 THE QUEEN OF NAPLES CHAPTER IV. MONSIEUR GAGXIERE'S BOOK. Whore-opened the Nelsonian Controversies? — Monsieur Gagniere's Researches at The British Museum — Maria Caroline's Letters to Emma Hamilton — Dr. Pettigrcw's Translations of those Letters — Viscount Valentia's ' Private Journal of the Affairs of Sicily, 1811 and 1812' — Errors in M. Gagnicre's first Chapter — ^I. Gagniere's Mistranslations into French of Lord Valentia's English — His Account of Emma Hamilton's earlier Years — His Statement that She came for the first Time to Naples, 'in 1791' — His Statement that she was Pitt's Prottqee and Spy — His scandalous Description of !Maria Caroline's Intimacy with Emma Hamilton — Fourteen Errors of Fact in a single Passage of Colletta's Book — General Colletta's Ignorance and Honesty — Feminine Purity of Maria Caroline's Letters to EmmaHamilton — M.Gagniere's Way of dealing with this Evidence — An Example of ]\L Gagniere's Fairness to two dead Women — His Abuse of Nelson. Some of the most thoughtful and judicious critics of ' Lady Hamilton and Lord Nelson ' having questioned whether I did wisely to re-open the various Nelsonian controversies, and also whether any good could result at this distance of time from a re-consideration of the many painful circumstances of her not edifying career, it is well for me to make it clear that it was not I M'ho re-opened the controversies, and also to show that history needed the account of the adven- turess, Avhich proves her to have been only a sub- ordinate agent and mere instrument, instead of a chief AND LORD NELSOX. 35 coutrolling power, of the political dramas in which she played so strange and interesting a part. The controversies were re-opened in a book that was concocted some three or four years since at the British Museum by Monsieur A. Gagniere, a French- man of whom I will do my best to write with judicial fairness. Getting access to the reading-rooms of the British Museum, this gentleman spent some time there in perusing and copying certain letters written by Maria Caroline of Naples to Emma Hamilton, in studying and making a few brief extracts from an interesting M.S. volume, entitled, ' Viscount Valentia's Private Journal of the Affairs of Sicily, 1811-12,'and in perus- ing such printed books as the scandalous ' Memoirs of Lady Hamilton' (181G), the 'Letters of Lord Nelson to Lady Hamilton ' (1814), and the ' Reminis- cences of Henry Angelo ' (] 828-30), which last-named book sets forth certain alleged incidents of Lady Ilamiltcm's earlier time, which the superannuated fencing-master imagined himself to remember, but certainly did not rememhcr* to the discredit of u woman, on whom he probably never set eyes. I am not aware that 'Viscount Valentia's Private Journal of the Affairs of Sicily, 1811-1812,'— from which Monsieur Gagniere took a few passages — has been printed; but most of the 'Letters from the Queen of Naples to Emma Hamilton' have been • Readers who wouM ascertain with the least posKiblc trouble the evidential wortldcsHiiesa of tlie tnwh written by old Ilcnry Au^'flo about Euiuiu Hamilton hIiouM refer to tlic Athcnxutri, No. 313J and No. 3134, U'th aud 19th of Nov., 1887. 1) 2 86 THE QUEEN OF NAPLES in the hands of Enghsh readers for just forty years. In England they have been known to bookish people ever since the English translations of the epistles appeared in Dr. Pcttigrew's ' Life of Nelson,' (1849). In the hands of the Messrs. T. and W. Boone and Dr. Pettigrew when the late publishers of 29, New Bond Street engaged the doctor to write the ' Life of Nelson,' the queen's letters, at some time after the pul)lication of that work, became part of the Egerton MSS. in the British Museum. These particulars are given in order that readers may see in wliat degree Monsieur Gagniere was justified in representing to his fellow-countrymen that the letters (of which his book is chiefly com- posed) were bought by the British Museum soon after Emma Hamilton's death, and that the collection of precious documents liad lain buried amongst the Museum MSS. for seventy years ('enfouie depuis soixante-dix ans dans les cartons du British Museum '). Monsieur Gagniere stops short of declaring himself the actual discoverer of the letters. But he states most precisely that the British Museum acquired them at Lady Hamilton's death, which occurred in January, 1815, and that they lay buried in the British Museum for seventy years, z.e., till 1885, in which last-named year he came upon them, and was working upon them in London. Consequently, if he did not himself bring them to the light, he was all but present at their discovery. All this of the collection of letters, which Dr. Pettigi-ew used, and most of which he published forty years since, in his * Life of Nelson !' Clearly Monsieur Gagniere is A^W LORD NELSON. 37 not a man to undervalue his services to liturature,* nor likely to miss celebrity through hiding his light under a bushel. ^Vithdrawing from the British Museum Avith his transcripts of the recently-discovered letters, Mon- sieur Gagniere lost no time in publishing his book ' La Reine Marie-Caroline de Naples d'aprcs des docu- ments nouveaux,' which, on the fly-leaf, is described by the more ample title, 'La Reine Marie-Caroline de Naples, Lady Hamilton et Nelson.' The exact date of the publication of this work I do not know ; but my copy of the second edition is dated 1880, whereas my ' Lady Hamilton and Lord Nelson ' appeared in the autumn of 1887. Dressed and flav- oured for the Parisian palate, ]\Ionsieur Gagniere's compilation tickled the taste of the French people, and, notwithstanding its calumnies on Nelson, has found readers on this side the channel. Monsieur Gagniere, or at least his English readers, may be cougi-atulated on his inaccuracy, for some of his blunders are extremely diverting. Tlie French- man who confounds the Grevilles with the Ncvills, and tells the world that the present Earl , King Ferchnand's whole reign might have won General Colletta's approval, and both the queens might have lived happily to the cud of their days. On one point of the matter as it stands in history, there is no room for difference of opinion. !Maria Theresa's niu-ture of the less intrepid of her two greatly historic dauglitors was in no degree discredited by the Queen, who endured her manifold sorrows and liumihations with lofty resignation, and accepted her fate with noble tranquilh'ty, when the hour came for her to die for no other cause tliaii that she was a queen. France would be glad if with an easy eoii- Hcienco she could aver fhat im (inhiring discredit came to her from that ghastly execution. The Icro- cious rabble who screamed out blasj)hemieK ;it their victim dunng lier slow journey from her last j)nHr»n to the place of death, the patnots who imagiiietl they 70 THE QUEEN OF NAPLES were teaching Europe a wliolcsome lesson by killing au iuuGCOut princess, the philosophers who spoke of the Queen's doom as only one of the many deaths needful for tlie adequate assertion of a sacred prin- ciple, were far from imagining how in the coming generations Franco would blush for the brutal out- rage on humanity, — how their passionate pains to cover a wretched woman with infamy would com- mend her to the admiration of posterity. Never did human rage more completely defeat its purpose. Had Marie-Antoinette been allowed to escape to Austna, she would long since have lived only in the vaguely- remembered pages of a few books of history, instead of being regarded by the nations as the most inter- esting woman of modern France. AND LORD NELSON. CHAPTER 11. LESS FOR LOVE THAN POWER. From Childhood to "Womanly Estate — Charles Bourbon's Acces- sion to the Throne of Spain— Dynastic Arrangements — Ferdinand of Naples — Council of Regency — I3ernardo, Marquis of Tanucci — His clever Management of the Council — Superlative Disinterestedness of Cliarles Bourbon — ' Regis- ter that ring !' — The Boy-King's Tutor— Tanucci's Craft and Charles's Policy — Muscular Education and Mental Neglect — Tlie Boy-King becomes a mighty Hunter — Good and Evil of his Nature — Ilis Energy and Indolence — Exag- gerations of his Ignorance — He attains his Majority — Be- trothal of Ferdinand and Maria Josephine — Maria Theresa's Designs for her Daughters — Maria Josephine's untimely Death — Another Match for the young King — Maria Caro- line's Betrothal to Ferdinand— 77/e important Stipulation of the Marriage Articles — Maria Caroline loaves Vienna for Naples — Splendour of her Progress — Italy in Ecstasies — Rejoicings at Florence — Maria Carolinu's Purpose and Pro- gramme — So Young and so Resolute I — The March ion ess Solari on Maria Theresa — Meeting of Ferdinand and Maria Caroline at Portella. 1702— 17G8 A.D. Tirr: year 1768 beheld Maria CaroIino'H passage fmm eln'Mhood to womanly estate. That slio passed thus <^arly, -when only fifteen years old, from the eoutrol of a governess to the companionship of a husband was duo to circumstances worthy of consideration. On succeeding to the throno of Spain and tho Indies in 17.51), Charles Bourbon of Na[)les was re- quired by European treaties to vacate the throne of 72 THE QUEEN OF NAPLES the Two Sicilicf?, and appoint a successor to the oroAvn that could not be worn by a King of Spain. At this time Charles Bourbon, the husband of a still beautiful queen in whom he delighted, was the father of six sous and two daughters, the three eldest of the sons being respectively named Philip, Charles Antony, and Ferdinand. Already in his thirteenth year, Philip, the eldest of the three brothers, was so de- ficient in mind and body as to preclude the hope that he would ever be capable of either ruling a kingdom or managing the affairs of a private estate. Under these painful circumstances, Charles Bourbon now revealed to the whole world a domestic trouble which had hitherto been withheld from notoriety, and with due observance of the ceremonious formalities need- ful for so grave a transaction, proclaimed his eldest son's incuraljle imbecility, and put him outside the dynastic arrangements of hi^ family. Selecting his second boy Charles Antony for heir-apparent to the Spanish throne, the king appointed Ferdinand, a vigorous lad in his ninth year, to succeed at once to the crown and throne of the Sicilies, For the sufficient government of the kingdom, thus committed to a child of tender age, Charles Bourbon gave the new sovereign of the Sicilies a council of regency, whose constitution was significant of Charles's design to remain as far as possible the ruler of the kiDgdoms from which he affected to be wholly with- drawing himself. The council of regency consisted of eight nobles, seven of whom were docile and un- ambitious courtiers, whilst the eighth, Bernardo, ]\Iarquis of Tanucci, was a statesman of extraordi- AND LORD AELSOX. 73 ricaiy intelligence, great experience, and overbearing will, in whose fidelity and devotion to his interest the retiring monarch had unqualified confidence. Tanucci, the one strong man of the eight regents, was ap- pointed prime minister of the kingdom and president of the council of nobles, who were authorized to rule the realm during the young king's nonage, i.e., till he should have completed his sixteenth year. For Charles Bourbon's purpose no better council could have been composed. The seven docile cour- tiers were men whose rank and general credit entitled them to their places about the boy-king, and helped to commend the government to the esteem of all the powers, whose favourable opinion was needed by Charles and Tanucci. Persons of consideration in the ♦Sicilies, they were acceptable to the foreign ministers at Naples. A statesman whose capacity liad been proved during years of official service, Tanucci was peculiarly (puilified for Iiis rather delicate jKjsitiou by his stately bearing, faultless temper, fine tart, and noble urbanity. Content with the possession of supreme authority. In; was wliolly devoid of tho vanity that would liave disposed In'm to assert it without due consideration for i\ui sensibilities of his comrades-iu-council. Never wounding their self- love by an air of superiority, he treated them with a winning show of respect, whilst secrt.'tly valuing them as so many puppets. On tho few occasions when he failed to cany them uiianimouHJy along with him, at the council-table, he affected to bi- so greatly moved by tlnir argumcnls as fo fr'cl tlio Jieed of further deliberations and of more definite 74 THE QUEEN OF NAPLES guidauco from Spain. By feigning the gravest respect for their scruples, and even a flattering disposition to yield to their sentiments, and subse- quently making an adroit use of ' latest letters ' from the Spanish king, he first soothed the superstitious anxieties of the councillors "who favoured the Pope, and eventually lured them into adopting the anti- papal policy, that still seemed to them alike im- pnident and sinful. Thus it was, that throughout the boy-king's nonage, Charles Bourbon contrived in all important matters to rule the realm, which he was supposed to have surrendered to his third son. Whilst thus arranging for the continuance of his influence over Neapolitan affairs, after ho should have ceased to be the King of Naples, Charles Bour- bon made a rather cmious parade of the honesty and disinterestedness of his deahngs with the State, from which he was about to i-etire. Registering the accounts of the kingdom, so as to leave behind him a perpetual record of his immunity from gi-eed and avarice, he declared that he would take into Spain none of the gold jewels and costly paraphernalia per- taining to the Sicilian crown. He even took from one of his fingers an antique ring, that had been found in the excavations of Pompeii, and ordered it to be registered and preserved with the jewels belonging to the State. The ring was gi-eatly valuable neither from its material nor from its workmanship, but, not- withKtanding the smallness of its worth, the retiring monarch refused to keep the toy which did not belong to him ; and in CVjlletta's time the far from precious relic was exhiljited in one of the pubho AXD LORD KELSON. 75 galleries of Naples, as an evidence of the king's nice conscientiousness. One may be pardoned for smiling at this display of virtue by the sovereign, who whilst he declined to retain the comparatively worthless ring- on his finger, was doing his best to keep all Naples in his hand. As the Piince of San Nicandro resembled the other six subordinate courtiers of the council, in being the Prime Minister's mere instrument, ho is less to be blamed than the Marquis of Tanucci for the short- comings of Ferdinand's defective education. A man of enlightenment, Tanucci was himself neither want- ing in cultiu'c nor indifferent to the interests of the higher arts. A man of learning, he is honourably remembered for l^eginning the excavations of lier- culaneum and Pompeii. But as he was ambitious of hohling the place nf premier till his death, and was of opinioii that he slicjuld find an ignorant king mori' manageable than a king Avhose superior attainments might dispose him, in the season of youthful suirici- ency, to think lightly of his chief counsellor's saga- city, Tanucci encouraged the Prince of San Nicandro to Ije more careful for his pupil's bodily welfare, than for liis mental dovelopnient. TIhi"' .iro also grounds for a suspicion, that Charles the Third of Sjciin was aware of 'I'anucci's design to check the young king's intellectual growth, and agreed with the wary states- man in thinking it would bo more convenient for both Naples and Spain that the young king sluaild not grow up so clever and mentally energetic as to bo denirous of ruling as well as reigning. Anyhow the education, for which San Nicandro 76 THE QUEEN OF NAPLES has liithcrto been licltl (jliie'fly accountable, was just the -vvroug education for the boy-kiug, who in his ninth year was one of the briglit, well-grown, saucy and rather intelhgent urchins who usually become such men as their tutors wish to make them. Devoid of genius, but otherAvise far from mentally deficient, he might by good training have been raised to the intellectual level of Maria Theresa's sons. And, had he l)een so trained, he might have proved as humane and benevolent a despot as Joseph or Leopold ; for though his passions were violent, and in the worst seasons of his career were sometimes coloured with crueltj^ his nature was far from devoid of generosity and kindliness. Unfortunately for the young king, Tanucci decided that he should be over-educated on the side of his nature, which might have been left to take care of itself, and l)e allowed to grow up almost without any education at all on the side of his nature which needed the most careful culture. Had he been a nervous, weakly, timid child, delighting in books but morbidly averse to masculine sports, he would hav^e benefitted from the discipline, which caused him to spend most of his wakeful hours in the open air, and encouraging him to delight in the fatigue and perils of the chase gave him in his sixteenth year tile reputation of being the best shot, the cleverest fisherman, and the most fearless horseman to be found in his dominions. But the shapely, robust, athletic youngster, who under any educational condi- tions would have distinguished himself in the ruder exercises and gi-own to be one of the swiftest runners and strongest wrestlers in southern Italy, needed no AXD LORD NELSOX. 77 encouragement to become the keenest sportsman of his generation. The boy, whose superabundant bodily vigour was attended with the mental indolence and impatience of studious labour, so often observable in young people, needed the management that, whilst slightly cheeking his passion for muscidar pastimes and the field sports, would have quickened hi» curiosity respecting scholarly matters, and inspired him with a desire to escape the opprobrium of ignor- ance. Under the control of a capable and sympathetic tutor, who would have said to him every morning, ' Now, sir, let us play our best with those books for two good hours and then spend the rest of tlie day with our horses and guns,' Ferdinand Bourbon would have grown to be a clever man (for nature had en- dowed him fairly well with brain-force), and would have been none the worse, possibly would liave been all the better sportsman, for the suflicient education of his higher faculties. Unfortunately the rulers of his youth, eitlier from base suljservienco or foolish policy, encouraged him to spend his time as though the highest career open to him were that of a cavalry officer. The marvel is that ho turned out so well, and did not really become some such a noisy clown as tho grossest of his caricaturists wished us to think ln"m. Ho would have turned out mucli worse, had not tho good largely exceeded the evil of his inconsistent nature. No doul)t ho was grossly ignorant in com- parison witli his brotlier-in-Iaw, Leopold of Tuscany^ and throughout his Hfe was indifferent to literaturo and tho sciences, and regarded their followers with 78 THE QUEEN OF NAPLES more disdain than he cared to express. In thinldng thus contemptuously of the professors he was not singular. Even in this politer age one could point to persons of high dignity and some merit who think less favourably of the professors than the professors think of themselves. Nor was he so grotesquely unlettered as some of his detractors have represented. Whilst some accounts of his ignorance are obviously nothing else than humorous inventions, others are disproved hj the admissions of the very persons who first gave them general currency. Speaking from hearsay, for she had no knowledge of Ferchnand till long after his marriage, the Mar- chioness Solari declares that ' on his marriage with the Archduchess Caroline of Austria, he scarcely knew how to sign his name,' and that Maria Caroline ' T\-as actually the first to teach him so to read and to write as to make himself understood.' Though the latter assertion is less amazing than the former, it is questionable whether Ferdinand's epistolary style was greatly improved by his wife's care for his better education. That Maria Caroline's letters afford much interesting information and a superabundance of con- clusive evidence to the innocence of her intercourse ■with Emma Hamilton, I have already had occasion to rcraai'k ; but letter-writing was not an art in which Her ^lajesty excelled, and even in the season of her In'ghest literary skill slie so often failed to spell cor- rectly and write intelligibly, that it is difficult to imagine her acting as Ferdinand's writing-mistress when she was only fifteen years old. CoUetta says nothing in support of the staggering AND LORD NELSON. 79 statement that Ferdinand attained liis majority with- out being able to sign papers with sufficient ease and exactness. On the contrary, from what he says of the king's frequent forbearance to subscribe state documents with his own hand, the historian seems to have regarded the story which must have come to his ears as a mere fable. ' As he found it tedious,' says the author of the ' Storia di Napoli,' ' to sub- scribe his name to the acts of the government, ho ordered them to bo signed in his presence and im- pressed with his signet, which he jealously guarded.' Colletta therefore attributed to mere indolence what less judicious writers have attributed to lack of manual dexterity. The f;ict to which he thus called attention scarcely sustains the historian's imputation of ]ial)itual and nlniost incredible indolence. Tliough Elizabeth Tudor, the most energetic of ruling women, used to sign documents with her own hand, it was her practice to employ a professional penman — her * flourisher,' as he is styled in extant ' privy seals ' — to execute the more laborious part, the elaborate ' flourishes,' of her signatures. In taking good care of his signet, Ferdinand w;is guilty of nothing worse than proper prudence. One wouM like to liave Colletta's authority for saying that, in his distaste for councils of state and his desire to make them as brief as possible, Ferdinand forbade ink-stands to be put on the council-table, in order to prevent the delay caused by writing. In recording that the king 'never opened a book from a love of study,' Colletta may be held guiltless of liljelling the sovereign, who was as wanting in literary taste as it is possible for a 80 THE QUEEN OF NAPLES. mau to be ; but certainly the historian exceeded the trutli by adding that Ferdinand 'never read a paper from interest in public affairs,' for it would be easy to mention several papers which he read and re-read with the keenest interest on account of his lively concern in the public affairs to which they related. But, though the deficiencies of Ferdinand's educa- tion have been exaggerated, they were alike unfor- tunate for him and. shameful to the guardians of his youth. As a very little learning was sufficient for a king in the eighteenth century, the Marquis of Tanucci and the Prince of San Nicandro should at least have given their royal pupil the small amount of culture that would have saved him from a most galling kind of social disesteem. After coming to his majority on January 12th, 17