OS Of 01 1 31 1 i 21 1 1 1 GIFT -^ 'EC 22 1915 No. 143. Board of Estimate and Apportionment CITY OF NEW^ YORK SECOND REPORT BY THE BUREAU OF FRANCHISES Upon the application of the MARCONI TELEGRAPH-CABLE COMPANY, INC for authority to lay, construct, maintain and operate conductors under the streets and avenues of the City for the purpose of conducting and maintaining a general tele- graph business, with suggestions as to the proposed form of contract. .^fiH^ jrrQncY] nC ^O , y<<\ \TM< \ ^ _^ ; \ I V 1-. i< s I T Y )i JUNE 28. 1915 } M. B. BROWN PRINTING & BINDING CO., 37-41 Chambers Street. N. Y. 617B— 15— 15 ' Board of Estimate and Apportionment, The City of New York, Bureau of Franchises, Room 1307, Municipal Building, June 28, 1915. Hon. John Purroy Mitchel, Mayor, Chairman of the Board of Estimatt and Appor- tionment: Sir — At the meeting of the Board iield February 5, 1915, this Bureau reported upon the application of the Marconi Telegraph-Cable Company, Inc., for the consent of the Board to the laying, construction, maintenance and operation of such wires as might be necessary for the purpose of conducting and maintaining a general tele- graph business. With that report there was presented a form of contract which had been drafted by the Bureau, but as the provisions of the same were not acceptable to the Company, the matter was referred to the Corporation Counsel, with the re- quest that he confer with counsel to the Company on the entire contract as sub- mitted, and then advise the Board as to its power and authority in the premises. As stated in the above-mentioned report of the Bureau, the Marconi Telegraph- Cable Company, Inc., is a New York corporation which has accepted the Post Roads Act of Congress. By virtue of its acceptance of this act, the Company claims to have obtained certain privileges, including a limited power or authority to use the various Post Roads located in the entire United States, subject only to regulation by the local authorities of the various sections and to a reasonable charge for such regulation and for the use of that portion of the post roads exclusively appropriated by the Company. All of the streets and highways of the City of New York are, by act of Congress, post roads of the United States. For the purpose of ascertaining the status of the Company, the Corporation Counsel was asked for his opinion on the subject, and under date of November 2, 191-1, he rendered the same, holding that "The Marconi Telegraph-Cable Company, Inc., through its organization un- der the Laws of the State of New York as a telegraph company and its acceptance filed with the Postmaster General under Section 5268 of the United States Statutes, was authorized to construct its lines and operate through the streets and avenues of the City of New York." In explanation of this authority, the opinion quotes extracts from the opinions of the courts in various cases, including those rendered in New England Telegraph Co. vs. Essex, 206 Fed. Rep., 926; Telegraph Co. vs. Texas, 105 U. S., 460; Western Union Telegraph Co. vs. Massachusetts, 125 U. S., 530; St. Louis vs. Western Union Telegraph Co., 148 U. S., 92; Atlantic & Pacific Telegraph Co. vs. Philadelphia, 190 U. S., 160, and Western Union Telegraph Co. vs. Richmond, 224 U. S., 160. It A'as also stated in the Corporation Coiniscrs opinion that any hcense fee whicli might be levied by the State of New York or The City of New York upon telegraphic ■ nessages transmitted by the Comply from the State of New York to the State of New Jersey would be void. As the applicant company was organized by the Marconi Wireless Telegraph Company of America to act as its agent in the receipt and de- livery of messages in the City of New York, received by or destined for transmis- sion at the Wireless Company's stations located in New Brunswick and Belmar, New Jersey, it can readily be seen that all its business will be of an interstate char- acter and that the Com.pany cannot, therefore, be required to pay the City an annual sum based on a percentage of its gross receipts. However, the Corporation Counsel stated that the City liad the right to demand reasonable compensation for the use of the streets by the Company. What this reasonable compensation should be it was rather difficult to determine. After an examination of the court opinions cited by the Corporation Counsel, of the previous grants that had been made to companies which had accepted the Post Roads Act and of the statements as to the payments which had been made by the various com.panies to the State Comptroller for the "regulation" by the Board of Electrical Control prior to 1898, the conclusion was reached that an annual charge of $2,500, if the Company were confined to the Bor- ough of Manhattan, could not be considered other than reasonable. The Company, however, objected strenuously to any charge except that which might be made by the Subway Company for the use of its ducts and contended that the issue so raised was a matter for legal determination. The Bureau therefore recommended that the matter be referred to the Corporation Counsel, which was done. Negotiations With Coiitf'aiiy. Mr. A. J. Baldwin, Attorney for the Corr.pany, began negotiations with Assistant Corporation Counsel Rosensohn, to whom the matter was referred, and on March 2Sth, at the invitation of Mr. Rosensohn, representatives of this Bureau attended a conference with Mr. Baldwin at his office. At this conference, in view of the attitude of the Corporation Counsel the Company, by its attorney, agreed that it would pay some compensation to the City, and by letter on April 13, offered an initial payment of $1,000. and an annual rental based on the mileage of conductors used. This was not in sufficiently definite form, and on April 22 Mr. Baldwin called with the President of the Company, Mr. E. J. Nally. when the $5,000 initial payment was agreed to and the Company offered to pay the City the annual sum of $100 per rr.ile of circuit used by it in the city, with a minimum of $1,000 a year. As the Company, at present, proposes to lease all its circuits, they will in all probability be metallic circuits. Under date of May 3, the attorney, in answer to a communication of this Bureau, submitted the form of contract drafted by this Bureau, amended in line with the negotiations that had been carried on, so as to meet with his views, and the same was thereupon submitted to the Corporation Counsel for his examination and approval, after the Bureau had made one or two further amendments that, it was believed, were required. On May 24 the Corporation Counsel approved the contract as finally amended by the Bureau and the same was then transmitted to the Company for final acceptance. Previous Exffrioicc Willi Cuiiifonics of 'litis Character. In the very early consents applied for and granted by the City, no charges were imposed on the companies obtaining the same. These consents, however, are ex- tremely few in number, as the vast majority of the companies claimed to be privileged to use the streets without the consent of the City, based on the wording of their incorporation act as interpreted by the courts. One of the first grants which imposed a charge was that made to a company which had not accepted the Post Roads Act, viz., the Metropolitan Telephone and Telegraph Company, on December 13. 1881. This resolution provided that— "For each street opened and used by the company, under this permission, for the purpose of laying therein its lines of electrical conductors, it shall pay to the City a sum equal to one cent for each lineal foot of such street occupied." (Ap- proved Papers, Vol. 49, p. 406.) Almost identical provisions were contained in the consents granted to the Western Union Telegraph Company May 2, 1883 (Approved Papers, Vol. 51, p. 155), and to the Commercial Cable Company, November 12, 1884 (Approved Papers, Vol. 52, p. 461). The Western Union Telegraph Company is a New York corporation which has accepted the Post Roads Act, while the Commercial Cable Company is a cable company. It has been ascertained that the above three companies have never paid anything to the City under the consents mentioned. Coming to more recent years and after the enactment of the Greater New York Charter of 1897, wc find tlie Board in 1911 considering the application of the Postal Telegraph-Cable Company, a New York corporation which had accepted the Post Roads Act. In this case the Bureau in its report to the Board under date of March 27, 1911, recommended that the Company be charged an initial sum of $10,000 to pay the expense to the City of the examination of the application of the Company and all work incidental thereto, and annual sums ranging from $5,000 to $7,500. In this case the proposed use of the street was fixed and certain and the line was being constructed to be used as a substitute for one which had to be abandoned because of the improvement of Jamaica Bay and which it was agreed should be transferred to the City when the new line was completed. However, the Company objected to the payment of the sums proposed or to the payment of any money, and, the matter having been referred to the Franchise Committee, the provision for payments was elimin°ated after consultation with the Corporation Counsel. The contract as finally entered into under date of February 27, 1912, merely requires the transfer to the City of the conduits to be abandoned, in consideration of the consent to the use of the "Conduit Lands" by the new hne. After this contract was entered into, the opinion of the United States Supreme Court in Western Union Telegraph Company vs. Richmond, 224 U. S. 160, was rendered. This opinion apparently is considered as conceding that municipalities when dealing with companies which have accepted the Post Roads Act have more powers and authority than was heretofore supposed. In any event, the next Post Road companv considered by the Board-viz., the Stock Quotation Telegraph Company-entered into a contract with the City on May 8, 1913, under which it agreed to pay an initial sum of $10,000. and 3, 4 and 5 per cent, of its gross receipts during the term of its contract, with minimums of $4,300, $6,000 and $7,500. The Stock Quotation Company, however, is engaged largely in the conduct of a local business, while the present applicant intends to engage solely in an interstate business. There is also some doubt as to whether the operations of the Stock Quotations Company entitle it to any privileges under the Post Roads Act. Under all the circumstances, I deem the present settlement of the question between the City and the applicant Marconi Company to be favorable to the City and feel justified in recommending its approval by the Board. Proposed Form of Contract. The main provisions of the proposed form of contract have already been discussed in the previous report of this Bureau on the Company, under date of January 30, so reference will be made only to the amendments to the same. Section 1. This section is amended so as to permit the Company to operate in the entire City, instead of merely in the Borough of Manhattan, and by including the word "use" as to the wires which it will operate, is intended to refer to wires which the Company may lease as well as to those which it may own and operate. In view of the fact that the Company has now agreed to the payment to the City of an annual sum, measured by the length of the condi'ctor used by it, there did not appear to be any objection to increasing the territory in which it may operate. It will be remembered that the Bureau recommended a flat sum when it was proposed to confine it to the Borough of Manhattan. Section 2. First. This section has been amended so as to prohibit the Company from using the wires or conductors operated by it for a telephone, messenger or signal business. As it has been held that the Post Roads .^ct confers no rights or privileges on companies conducting a telephone, messenger or signal business, etc.. the City has full power when authorizing the use of the streets for such a business to compel the grantee to accept a franchise with all its incidents. The applicant company does not desire a franchise, nor does it wish at present to engage in any of the prohibited forms of business. The contract was drafted so that the Company would be vested with no privileges in this connection, and should it ever desire to extend its operations, it can then apply to the Board for permission to do so, when the matter can be taken up and considered by itself. It will be seen, therefore, that the only authority in the Company under the Post Roads .A.ct and the proposed contract is the conduct of a telegraph business between various points by means of Morse instruments or an improvement of the same. The operation of "pony" wires connecting offices of the Company with offices of its subscribers is conceded to be included in this authority. Section 2. Third. This provision relates to the compensation which is to be paid by the Company to the City. It provides that the sum of $5,000 be paid within thirty days from the date upon which the contract is signed by the Mayor, in order to reim- burse the City for the expense of examination of the application and all work in connection therewith. The annual payment is to be $100 per mile for each and every metallic circuit used or operated by the Company, with a minimum of $1,000. The method of arriving at the total length of these circuits for the purpose of deter- mining what the Company is to pay to the City is specir.c