\ \\m 1 ; I 1 u T"! UNIVHSIT \ ^lon \ OF CALIFORNIA o o vavaavg VINVS JO ASV)!n 3H1 O O THE LIBRARY Of o \ O THE UNIVERSITY SANTA BARBARA o THE LIBRARY OF o I O V8V9SV9 V1NVS O OF CALIFORNIA o o THE UNIVERSITY o JO ASVaSIl 3Hi o THE LIBRARY OF o I o VINttOJIlO JO . e THE UNIVERSITY o * SANIA BARBARA O OF CALIFORNIA JO Amail 3Hi e VDV8!IV9 VINVS 5 5 O All$!l3AINn 3H1 OF CALIFORNIA e JO ABVWI1 3H1 O TH UNIVERSITY e $ SANTA BARBARA O THE LIBRARY OF o I VINDOJIW3 JO * o VHVflav? VINVS o AllSH3MNn 3H1 O OF CALIFORNIA o JO ASV88I1 3H1 e THE LIBRARY OF o i VINSOJIW3 JO o o VMVWV9 VINVS o I O VW9ttV9 VINVS o THE LIBRARY OF o I O THE UNIVERSITY e OF CALIFORNIA AiisasAiNn 3m o SANTA BARBARA THE UNIVERSITY o 9, JO AtlVWI 3H1 SANTA BARBARA Modern Engineering Practice Sc&oat. a-L d A Reference Library ON ELECTRICITY, STEAM, GAS ENGINES AND PRODUCERS, AUTOMOBILES, MARINE AND LOCOMOTIVE WORK, REFRIGERATION, PATTERN MAKING, FOUNDRY WORK, SHOP PRACTICE, TOOL MAKING, FORGING, MECHANICAL DRAWING, MACHINE DESIGN, HEATING, VENTILATION, STEAM FITTING, PLUMBING, ELEVATORS, ETC. Editor-in- Chief FRANK W. GUNSAULUS PRESIDENT, ARMOUR INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY Assisted by a Corps of DISTINGUISHED ENGINEERS AND TECHNICAL EXPERTS Illustrated with ever Five Thousand Engravings TWELVE VOLUMES CHICAGO AMERICAN SCHOOL OF CORRESPONDENCE 1908 COPYRIGHT 1902, 1903, 1905, 1906, 1908 BY AMERICAN SCHOOL OF CORRESPONDENCE Entered at Stationers' Hall, London All Rights Reserved Editor-in-Chief FRANK W. GUNSAULUS President, Armour Institute of Technology Authors and Collaborators F. B. CROCKER, M. E., Ph. D. Head of Department of Electrical Engineering, Columbia University. Past President, American Institute of Electrical Engineers. WILLIAM T. McCLEMENT, A. M. Formerly Professor of Chemical Engineering, Armour Institute of Technology. WILLIAM ESTY, S. B., M. A. Head of Department of Electrical Engineering, Lehigh University. Joint Author of "The Elements of Electrical Engineering." VICTOR C. ALDERSON, D. Sc. President, Colorado School of Mines. DUGALD C. JACKSON, B. S., C. E. Head of Department of Electrical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology. LOUIS DERR, S. B., A. M. Associate Professor of Physics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology. HOWARD M. RAYMOND, S. B. Dean of Engineering Studies, Armour Institute of Technology. Authors and Collaborators Continued KEMPSTER B. MILLER, M. E. Telephone Expert and Consulting Engineer. Author of "American Telephone Practice." WALTER S. LELAND, S. B. Assistant Professor of Naval Architecture, Massachusetts Institute of Technology. American Society of Naval Architects and Marine Engineers. GEORGE C. SHAAD, S. B., E. E. Associate Professor of Electrical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Tech- nology. CHARLES DICKERMAN Refrigerating Engineer, Pennsylvania Iron Works Co. FRITZ LUBBERGER, E. E. Chief Engineer, Automatic Electric Co. Western Society of Engineers. ALBERT F. HALL, S. B. American Society of Mechanical Engineers. American Society of Naval Architects and Marine Engineers. Institute of Mechanical Engineers of England. German Society of Engineers. Associate Member, Institute of Civil Engineers of England. ALFRED E. PHILLIPS, C. E., Ph. D. Professor of Civil Engineering, Armour Institute of Technology. *r* CHARLES THOM Chief, Quadruplex Department. Western Union Telegraph Co. ARTHUR L. RICE, M. M. E. Editor of "The Engineer," Chicago. !r CHARLES E. DURYEA First Vice-President, American Motor League. Author of "Roadside Troubles." Authors and Collaborators Continued FRANCIS H. BOYER Constructing Engineer. American Society of Mechanical Engineers. LIONEL S. MARKS, S. B., M. M. E. Assistant Professor of Mechanical Engineering, Harvard University. American Society of Mechanical Engineers. SAMUEL S. WYER Mechanical Engineer. American Society of Mechanical Engineers. WALTER B. SNOW, S. B. Formerly Mechanical Engineer, B. F. Sturtevant Co. American Society of Mechanical Engineers. SAMUEL G. McMEEN Telephone Expert and Consulting Engineer. GEORGE L. FOWLER, A. B., M. E. Consulting Engineer. American Society of Mechanical Engineers. American Railway Master Mechanics' Association. LAWRENCE K..SAGER, S. B., M. P. L. Patent Attorney and Electrical Expert Formerly Assistant Examiner, U. S. Patent Office. WILLIAM C. BOYRER, M. E., M. M. E. Formerly Division Engineer, N. Y. and N. J. Telephone Co. WILLIAM S. NEWELL, S. B. With Bath Iron Works, Bath, Me. Formerly Instructor, Massachusetts Institute of Technology. ROBERT V. PERRY, S. B., M. E. Associate Professor of Machine Design, Armour Institute of Technology. Authors and Collaborators Continued NATHAN HASKELL DOLE Editor, "American Dictionary and Cyclopedia," "The Library of the World's Best ' Literature," "The Literature of All Nations," "The International Library of Literature," etc. ALFRED E. ZAPF, S. B. Secretary, American School of Correspondence. WILLIAM G. SNOW, S. B. Steam Heating Specialist. American Society of Mechanical Engineers. Author of "Furnace Heating," etc. MAURICE LEBOSQUET, s. B. British Society of Chemical Industry. American Chemical Society. FREDERICK W. TURNER Instructor in Machine Shop Work, Mechanic Arts High School, Boston. JAMES RITCHEY Formerly Instructor in Wood Working, Armour Institute of Technology. JAMES R. CRAVATH Western Editor, "Street Railway Journal," Chicago. JOHN C. SHERMAN, S. B. Formerly with the Westinghouse Companies. MELVILLE B. WELLS, C. E. Associate Professor of Bridge and Structural Engineering, Armour Institute of Technology. CHARLES L. HUBBARD, S. B., M. E. Consulting Engineer on Heating, Ventilating, Lighting and Power. Authors and Collaborators Continued R. F. SCHUCIIARDT, B. S. Testing Engineer, Chicago Edison Company. ^ EDWARD R. MARKHAM Consulting Mechanical Engineer. Instructor in Machine Shop Work, Harvard University and Rindge Manual Training School. Formerly Superintendent, Waltham Watch Tool Co. American Society of Mechanical Engineers. GEORGE F. GEBHARDT, M. E., M. A. Professor of Mechanical Engineering, Armour Institute of Technology. CHARLES E. LORD, S. B. Manager of Patent Department, Bullock Electric Mfg. Co. ^ A. FREDERICK COLLINS Author of "Wireless Telegraphy, Its History, Theory, and Practice." WM. C. STIMPSON Head Instructor in Foundry Work and Forging, Department of Science and Technology, Pratt Institute. EVERETT E. KENT, S. B., LL. B. Counselor-at-Law, Attorney, and Expert in Patent Cases. HENRI F. CHADWICK, S. B. President.. Casino Technical Night School, Pittsburg. JOHN LORD BACON Instructor in Forge Work, Lewis Institute, Chicago. ERVIN KENISON, S. B. Department of Mechanical Drawing, Massachusetts Institute of Technology. CHARLES L. GRIFFIN, S. B. Mechanical Engineer, Semet-Solvay Co. Formerly Professor of Machine Design, Pennsylvania State College. American Society of Mechanical Engineers. Authors and Collaborators Continued PERCY H. THOMAS, S. B. Of Thomas & Neall, Electrical Engineers, New York Cit., . Formerly Chief Electrician, Cooper Hewitt Electric Co. RALPH H. SWEETSER, S. B. Superintendent Algoma Steel Co., Ltd. American Institute of Mining Engineers. Formerly Instructor, Massachusetts Institute of Technology. ROBERT A. MILLIKAN, Ph. D. Associate Professor of Physics, University of Chicago. -* JOHN H. JALLINGS Mechanical Engineer. *r* LLEWELLYN V. LUDY, M. E. Professor of Mechanical Engineering, Purdue University. American Society of Mechanical Engineers. CHARLES E. KNOX, E. E. Consulting Electrical Engineer. American Institute of Electrical Engineers. WALTER H. JAMES, S. B. Department of Mechanical Drawing, Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Tr- LAWRENCE S. SMITH, S. B. Department of Mechanical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, ROBERT H. THURSTON, C. E., Ph. B., A. M., LL. D. Late Director of Sibley College of Engineering, Cornell University. Author of "Manual of the Steam Engine," "Manual of Steam Boilers," "History of the Steam Engine," etc. "*" SILVANUS P. THOMPSON, D. Sc., B. A., F. R. S., F. R. A. S. Principal and Professor of Physics in the City and Guilds of London Technical College. Author of "Electricity and Magnetism," "Dynamo-Electric Machinery," "Polyphase Electric Currents," "Electromagnet," etc. ^ W. S. FRANKLIN and R. G. WILLIAMSON Joint Authors of "The Elements of Alternating Current." Authorities Consulted Continued EDWARD R. MARKHAM Instructor in Machine Shop Work, Harvard University and Rindge Manual Training School; Formerly Superintendent Waltham Watch Tool Co. Author of "The American Steel Worker." TT SAMUEL EDWARD WARREN Late Professor of Descriptive Geometry and Drawing, Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Author of "General Problems in Shades and Shadows," "Shadows and Perspective," "Higher General Problems with Linear Perspective of Form," "Shadow and Reflection," etc. THOMAS D. WEST Practical Moulder and Foundry Manager; Member, American Society of Mechanical Engineers. Author of "American Foundry Practice." ^ ROBERT WILSON Author of "Treatise on Steam Boilers." "Boiler and Factory Chimneys," etc. JAMES J. LAWLER Author of "Modern Plumbing, Steam and Hot Water Heating." WILLIAM C. UNWIN, F. R. S., M. Inst. C. E. Professor of Civil and Mechanical Engineering, Central Technical College, City and Guilds of London Institute, etc. Author of "Machine Design," "The Development and Transmission of Power from Central Stations," etc. r>* WILLIAM ESTY, S. B., M. A. Head of Department of Electrical Engineering, Lehigh University. Joint Author of "The Elements of Electrical Engineering." WILLIAM H. VAN DERVOORT, M. E. Author of "Modern Machine Shop Tools." V J. A. EWING, M. A., B. Sc., F. R. S., M. Inst. C. E. Professor of Mechanism and Applied Mechanics in the University of Cambridge. Author of "The Steam Engine and Other Heat Engines." A. E. SEATON Author of "A Manual of Marine Engineering." ROLLA C. CARPENTER, M. S., C. E., M. M. E. Professor of Experimental Engineering, Cornell University; Member, American Society of Heat- ing and Ventilating Engineers; Member, American Society of Mechanical Engineers. Author of "Heating and Ventilating Buildings." Table of Contents VOLUME XI MACHINE DESIGN . . . . . By C. L. Griffin^ Page *11 Principles and Methods Mechanical Thought Invention Use of Handbooks Calculations and Notes Sketches Theoretical Design Practical Modifica- tion Delineation and Specification Constructive Mechanics Forces and Moments Tension, Compression, Torsion Friction and Lubrication Work- ing Stresses and Strains Designing an Elevator Wire-Rope Drive Reversed Machine Design Classification of Machinery Machine Tools (Lathe, Planer, Milling Machine, etc.) Motive- Power Machinery (Steam Engine, Air-Compres- sor, etc.) Structural Machinery (Cranes, Elevators, Cars, etc.) Mill and Plant Machinery (Rolls, Crushers, Drills, etc.) Cast and Wrought Iron and Steel Original Design Design of Component Parts of Machinery HEATING AND VENTILATION . . By C. L. Hubbard Page 197 Systems of Warming Hot- Air Furnaces Direct and Indirect Steam and Hot- Water Heating Radiators Exhaust Steam Heating Ventilation Heat Losses Direct- and Indirect-Draft Furnaces Furnace Details Smoke-Pipes Flues Cold-Air Box Warm- Air Pipes Registers Circulation Coils Systems of Piping Air- Valves Vacuum Systems Fans and Blowers Factory Heating Electric Heating Automatic Regulators Air-Filters and Washers Heating and Ventilating Schools, Churches, etc. PLUMBING . . . . . . By C. L. Hubbard Page 411 Fixtures Bathtubs Water-Closets Urinals Lavatories Sinks Traps Tanks Faucets Soil and Waste Pipes Tile Pipes Cesspools Traps and Vents Siphonage Back and Local Venting Fresh- Air Inlets Foul- Air Outlets Sewage Disposal Pipe Connections (Bathroom, Kitchen Sink) Pipe Sizes Plumbing for Dwelling Houses ; for Apartment Houses; for Hotels; for Railroad Stations; for Schoolhouses ; for Shops and Factories Testing and Inspection Sewerage Systems (Separate, Combined) Manholes Flushing Devices Ventilation of Sewers Catch-Basins Storm Overflows Pumping Stations Tidal Chambers Sewage Purification Sedimentation Mechan- ical Straining Chemical Precipitation Irrigation Intermittent Filtration Domestic Water Supply Pumps Storage Tanks Water-Backs Circula- tion Pipes Temperature Regulators Gas Fitting Testing Installation Gas Fixtures Gas Heating and Cooking Gas Meters Gas Machines REVIEW QUESTIONS Page 525 INDEX . Page 539 *For page numbers, see foot of pages. tFor professional standing of authors, see list of Authors and Collaborators at front of volume. PRINCIPLE OF HOT WATER HEATING ILLUSTRATED BY TRANSVERSE SECTIONAL VIEW SHOWING BOILER, RADIATOR AND EXPANSION TANK, American Radiator Company. it 111 MACHINE DESIGN, PART I. Definition. Machine Design is the art of mechanical thought development, and specification. It is an art, in that its routine processes can be analyzed and systematically applied. Proficiency in the art positively cannot be attained by any " short cut " method. There is nothing of a spectacular nature in the methods of Machine Design. Large results cannot be accomplished at a single bound, and success is possible only by a patient, step-by-step advance in accordance with well-established principles. " Mechanical thought " means the thinking of things strictly from their mechanical side; a study of their mechanical theory, structure, production, and use; a consideration of their mechanical fitness as parts of a machine. " Mechanical development " signifies the taking of an idea in the rough, in the crude form, for example, in which it comes from the inventor, working it out in detail, and refining and fixing it in shape by the designing process. Ideas in this way may become commercially practicable designs. "Mechanical specification" implies the detailed description of designs, in such exact form that the shop workmen are enabled to construct completely and put in operation the machines repre- sented in the designs. The object of Machine Design is the creation of machinery for specific purposes. Every department of a manufacturing plant is a controlling factor in the design and production of the machines built there. A successful desio-n cannot be out of O harmony with the organized methods . of production. Hence in the high development of the art of Machine Design is involved a knowledge of the operations in all the departments of a manu- facturing plant. The student is therefore urged not only to familiarize himself with the direct production of machinery, but to study the relatiou thereto of the allied commercial departments 11 MACHINE DESIGN IK- should get into the spirit of business at the start, get into the shop atmosphere, execute his work just as though the resulting design were to be built and sold in competition. He should visit shops, work in them if possible, and observe details of design and methods of finishing machine parts. In this way he will begin to store up bits of information, practical and commercial, which will have valuable bearing on his engineering study. The labor involved in the design of a complicated automatic machine is evidenced by the designer's wonderful familiarity with : is every detail as he stands before the complete* 1 machine in operation and explains its movements to an observer. The intri- cate mass of levers, shafts, pulleys, gears, cams, clutches, etc., etc., packed into a small space, and confusing even to a mechanical mind, seems like a printed book to the designer of them. This is so because it is a familiar journey for the designer's mind to run over a path which it has already traversed so many times that he can see every inch of it with his eyes shut. Every detail of that machine has been picked from a score or more of possible ideas. One by one, ideas have been worked out, laid aside, and others taken up. Little by little, the special fitness of certain devices has become established, but only by patient, care- ful consideration of others, which at first seemed equally good. Every line, and corner, and surface of each piece, however small that piece may be, has been through the refining process of theoretical, practical, and commercial design. Every piece has been followed in the mind's eye of its designer from the crude material of which it is made, through the various processes of fin- \shing, to its final location in the completed machine; thus its bodily existence there is but the realization of an old and familiar picture. AVhat wonder that the machine seems simple to the designer of it! As he looks back to the multitude of ideas invented, worked out, considered and discarded, the machine in its final form is but a trifle. It merely represents a survival of the fittest. No successful machine, however simple, was ever designed that did not go through this slow process of evolution. No machine ever just simply happened by accident to do the work for which it is valued. No other principle upon which the suc- 12 MACHINE DESIGN 5 cessful design of machinery depends is so important as this careful, patient consideration of detail. A machine is seldom unsuccessful because some main point of construction is wrong. . The principal features of a machine are usually the easiest to determine. It is a failure because some little detail was overlooked, or hastily con- sidered, or allowed to be neglected, because of the irksome labor necessary to work it out properly. There is no task so tedious, for example, as the devising of the method of lubricating the parts of a complicated machine. Yet there is no point of design so vital to its life and operation as an absolute assurance of an adequate supply of oil for the moving parts at all times and under all circumstances. Suitable means often cannot be found, after the parts are together, hence the machine goes into service on a risky basis, with the result, per- haps, of early failure, due to "running dry." Good designers will not permit a design to leave their hands which does not pro- vide practically automatic oiling, or at least such means of lubri- cation that the operator can offer no excuse for neglecting to oil his machine. This is but a single illustration of many which might be presented to impress the definite and detail character necessary in work in Machine Design. Relation. The relation which Machine Design should cor- rectly bear to the problems that it seeks to solve, is twofold; and there are, likewise, two points of view corresponding to this two- fold relation, from which a study of the subject should be traced. Neither of these can be discarded and an efficient mastery of the art attained. These points are I. Theory. II. Production. I. Theory. From this point of view, Machine Design is merely a skeleton or framework process, resulting in a repre- sentation of ideas of pure motion, fundamental shape, and ideal proportion. It implies a working knowledge of physical and mathematical laws. It is a strictly scientific solution of the problem at hand, and may be based purely on theory which has been reasoned out by calculation or deduced from experiment. This is the only sure foundation for intelligent design of any sort. But it is not enough to view the subject from the standpoint MACHINE DESIGN of theory alone. If we stopped here we should have nothing but mechanisms, mere laboratory machines, simply structures of itiovnuit v ami examples of line mechanical skill. A machine may lu; correct in the theory of its motions; it may be correct in the theoretical proportions of its parts; it may even be correct in its operation for the time being; and yet its complication, its mis- directed and wasteful effort, its lack of adjustment, its expensive and irregular construction, its lack of compactness, its difficulty of ivudv repair, its inability to hold its own in competition any of these may thro\v the balance to the side of failure. Such a machine, commercially considered, is of little value. No shop will build it, no machinery house will sell it, nobody will buy it if it is put on the market. Thus we see that, aside from the theoretical correctness oi principle, the design of a machine must satisfy certain other exacting requirements of a distinctly business nature. IT. Production, From this point of view, Machine Design is the practical, marketable development of mechanical ideas. v iewed thus, the theoretical, skeleton design must be so clothed and shaped that its production may be cheap, involving simple and efficient processes of manufacture. It must be judged by the latest shop methods for exact, and maximum output. It must possess all the good points of its competitor, and, withal, some novel and valuable ones of its own. In these days of keen com- petition it is only by carefully studied, well-directed effort toward raj id, efficient, and, therefore, cheap production that any machine can be brought to a commercial basis, no matter what its other merits may be. All this must be thought of and planned for in the design, and the final shapes arrived at are quite as much a result of this second point of view as of the first. As a good illustration of this, may be cited the effect of the present somewhat remarkable development of the so-called '-high sj)eed '' steels. The speeds and feeds possible with tools made of these steels are such that the driving power, gearing' and feed mechanism of the ordinary lathe are wholly inadequate to the demands made upon tliem when working the tool to its limit. This means that the basis of design as used for the ordinary tool steel will not do, if the machine is expected to stand up to the i i MACHINE DESIGN cuts possible with the new steels. Hence, while the old designs were right for the old standard, a new one has been set, and a thorough revision on a high-speed basis is imminent, else the market for them as machines of maximum; output will' be lost. From these definitions it is evident that the designer must not only use all the theory at his command, but must continually inform himself on all processes and conditions of manufacture, and keep an eye on the tende~"y of the sales markets, both of raw material and the finished machinery product. This is what in the broadest sense is meant by the term " Mechanical Thought," thought which is directed and controlled, not only by theoretical principle but by closely observed practice. From the feeblest pretenders of design to those. engineers who consummate the boldest feats and control the largest enterprises, the process which produces results is always the same. Although experience is necessary for the best mechanical judgment, yet the studen.t must at least begin to cultivate good mechanical sense very early in his study of design. Invention. Invention is closely related to Machine Design, but is not design itself. Whatever is invented has yet to be designed. An invention is of little value until it has been refined by the process of design. Original design is of an inventive nature, but is not strictly invention. Invention is usually considered as the result of genius, and is announced in a flash of brilliancy. We see only the flash, but behind the flash is a long course of the mosl concentrated brain effort. Inventions are not spontaneous, are not thrown off like sparks from the blacksmith's anvil, but are the result of hard and applied thinking. This is worth noting carefully, for the same effort which produces original design may develop a valuable invention. But there is little possibility of inventing anything except through exhaustive analysis and a clear interpretation of such analysis. Handbooks and Empirical Data. The subject matter in these is often contradictory in its nature, but valuable nevertheless. Empirical data are data for certain fixed conditions and are not general. Hence, when handbook data are applied to some specific case of design, while the information should be used in the freest 8 MACHINE DESIGN manner, yet it must not be forgotten that the case at hand is prob- ably different, in some degree, from that upon which the data were based, and unlike any other case which ever existed or will ever afain exist. Therefore the data should be applied with the greatest discretion, and when so applied will contribute to the success of the design at least as a check, if not as a positive factor. The student should at the outset purchase one good handbook, and acquire the habit of consulting it on all occasions, checking and comparing his own calculations and designs therefrom. Care must be taken not to become tied to a handbook to such an extent that one's own lesults are wholly subordinated to it. Independence in design must be cultivated, and the student should not sacrifice his calculated results until they can be shown to be false or based on false as>umption. Originality and confidence in design will be the result if this course be honestly pursued. Calculations, Notes, and Records. Accurate calculations are the basis of correct proportions of machine parts. There is aright way to make calculations and a wrong way, and the student will usually take the wrong way unless he is cautioned at the start. The wrong way of making calculations is the loose and shift- less fashion of scratching upon a scrap of detached paper marks aiid figures, arranged in haphazard form, and disconnected and incomplete. These calculations are in a few moments' time totally meaningless, even to the author of them himself, and are so easily lost or mislaid that when wanted they usually cannot be found. Engineering calculations should always be made systemati- cally, neatly, and in perfectly legible form, in some permanently bound blank book, so that reference may always be had to them at any future time for the purpose of checking or reviewing. Put all the data down. Do not leave in doubt the exact conditions under which the calculations were made. Note the date of calcu- lation. Jf a mistake in figures is made, or a change is found neces- sary, never rub out the figures or tear out the leaf, or in any way obliterate the figures. Simply draw a bold cross through the wrong part and begin again. Often a calculation which is supposed to be wrong is later shown to be right, or the facts which caused the error ID ay be needed for investigatior and comparison. Time which MACHINE DESIGN 9 is spent in making figures is always valuable time, time too pre- cious to be thrown away by destroying the record. The recording of calculations in a permanent form, as just described, is the general practice in all modern engineering offices. This plan has been established purely as a business policy. In case of error it locates responsibility and settles dispute. Con- sistent designing is made possible through the records of past designs. Proposals, estimates, and bids may often be made instantly, on the basis of what these record books show of sizes and weights. This bookkeeping of calculations is as important a factor of systematic engineering as bookkeeping of business accounts is of financial success. The student should procure for this purpose a good blank book with a firm binding, size of page not smaller than 6 by 8 inches (perhaps 8 by 11 inches may be better), and every calculation, how- ever small and apparently unimportant, should be made in it. Sample pages of engineering calculations are reproduced in Eigs. 3 to 9. Note the sketch showing the forces. Note the clear statement of data. Note the systematic writing of the equations, and the definite substitutions therein. Note the heavy double underscoring of the result, when obtained. There is nothing in the whole process of the calculation that cannot be reviewed at any moment by anybody, and in the briefest time. The development of a personal note-book is of great value to the designer of machinery. The facts of observation and experi- ence recorded in proper form, bearing the imprint of intimate personal contact with the points recorded, cannot be equalled in value by those of any hand or reference book made by another. There is always a flavor about a personal note-book, a sort of guarantee, which makes the use of it by its author definite and sure. The habit of taking and recording notes, or even knowing what notes to take, is an art in itself, and the student should begin early to make his note-book. Aside from the value of the notes themselves as a part of his personal equipment, the facility ,v:.iii which his eye will be trained to see and record mechanical things will be of great value in all of his study and work. How many men go through a shop and really see nothing of the opera- 17 10 MACHINE DESIGN tions going on therein, or, seeing them, remember nothing ! "An engineer, trained in this respect, will to a surprising degree be able to retain and sketch little details which fall under his eye for a brief moment only, while he is passing through a crowded shop. Some draftsmen have the habit of copying all the standard tables of the various offices in which they work. "While these are of some value in a few cases, yet this is not what is meant by a good note-book in the best sense. Ideas make a good note-book, not a mere tabulation of figures. If the basis upon which stan- dards are founded can be transferred to permanent personal record, or novel methods of calculation, or' simple features of construc- tion, or data of mechanical tests, or efficient arrangement of machinery if tlu*c can be preserved for reference, the note-book will be of greatest value. Whatever is noted down, make clear and intelligible, illus- trating by a sketch if possible. Make the cote so clear that reference to it after a long space of years would bring the whole subject before the mind in an instant. If this is not done the author of the note himself will not have patience to dig out the meaning when it is needed; and the note will be of no value. METHOD OF DESIGN. The fundamental lines of thought and action which every designer follows in the solution of any problem in any class of work whatsoever, are four in number. The expert may carry all these in mind at the same time, without definite separation into a a step- by-step process; but the student must master them in their proper sequence, and thoroughly understand their application. In these four are concentrated the entire art of Machine Design. When they have become so familiar as to be instinctively applied on any and all occasions, good design is the result. The only other quality which will facilitate still further the design of good machinery is experience; and that cannot be taught, it must be acquired by actual work. i. Analysis of Conditions and Forces. First, take a good square look at the problem to be solved. Study it from all sides, view it in all lights, note the worst conditions which can possibly exist, note the average conditions of service, note any special or irregular service likely to be called for. : - MACHINE DESIGN 11 "With these conditions well in mind, make a careful analysis of all the forces, maximum as well as average, which may be brought into play. Make a rough sketch of the piece under con- sideration, and put in these forces. Be sure that these forces are at least approximately right. Go over the analysis carefully again and again. Remember that time saved at the beginning by hasty and poor analysis will actually be time lost at the end; and if the machine actually fails from this reason, heavy financial loss in material and labor will occur. Any haste toward com- pletion of the structure beyond the roughest outline, without this careful study of forces, is a blind leap in the dark, entirely un- scientific, and almost certain to result in ultimate failure. On the other hand this principle may be carried too far. In trying to make the analysis thorough and the forces accurate, it is quite possible to consume more than a reasonable amount of time. Again, it is not always easy, and frequently impossible, to deter- mine exactly the forces acting on a given piece. But their nature, whether sudden or slowly applied, rapid in action or only oc- curring at intervals, and their approximate direction and magni- tude at least, are always capable of analysis. There are few, if any, cases where close assumptions cannot be made on the &bove basis and the design proceeded with accordingly. Hence the danger of too great refinement of analysis is simply to be avoided by the designer's plain business sense. The first tendency of the student is to pass over the study of the forces as dull and dry, and attempt the design at once. He soon finds himself facing problems oi which he sees no possible solution, and he bases his design on pure guess-work. This is the only solution possible from such a point of view, and is really no solution at all. A guer.s which has some rational backing is often successful; but in that case some analysis is required, and it is not a pure guess, but falls under the very principle we are considering. There is no short cut to the design of machine parts which avoids this full understanding of the forces that they must sustain. The size of a belt depends upon the maximum pull upon it, and the designing of belts is nothing but providing sufficient cross-section of leather to prevent the belt tearing under 19 12 MACHINE the pull. Again, if pulley arms are not to break, or shafts twist oil", or bolts be torn apart, or the teeth of gears fail, or keys and pins shear ofr, we must first, of course, iind out what .forces exist which are likely to produce stress that may lead to such breakage. "We should not guess at the sizes, and then run the machine to see if breakage results, and then guess again. Ma- chines are sometimes built in this way, but it is an unreasonable and uncertain method. We must use every effort to foresee the stress which a piece ia liable to receive, before we decide its size, "We must know all the forces approximately, if not positively. The analysis must be thorough enough to permit of reasonable assumption, if not positive assertion, it ia manifestly impossible to solve any problem until we know exactly what the problem is; and a full analysis is the statement of the problem. 2. Theoretical Design. After we know by careful analysis what stress the machine part has to sustain, the next step is so to design it that it will theoretically resist the applied forces with the least expenditure of material. "We often see machinery with the metal of which it is made distributed in the worst possible manner. In places where the stress is heavy and a rigid member is needed, we find a weak, springy part; wrile in other parts, where there are no forces to be resisted, or vibration to be absorbed, there seems to be a waste of good material. Whether in such case the analysis of the forces was poor, or perhaps not made at all, or whether a knowledge of how to design so as to resist the given forces was wholly absent, cannot be told. At any rate, lack of either or both is clearly shown in the result. Any member of a machine may vary in form from a solid block or chunk of material to an open ribbed structure. The solid chunk fills the requirement as-faras strength is concerned, unless it is so heavy as to fail from its own weight. But such construe- tion is poor design, except in cases where the concentration of heavy mass