f^2 COf>. UC-NRLF B 3 575 Sm 'y^^:. ^^r fei^^^^^?fA^^^^^%^' "^- . , ' " LIBRARY University of California. GIFT OF Class ^y Our Annus Mirabilis CORNELIUS BEACH BRADLEY [Reprinted from The University Chronicle, Vol. IV, No. 3] OF BERKELEY THE UNIVERSITY PRESS 1901 OUR ANNUS MIRABILIS.* By Cornelius Beach Bradley. In 1667 — exactly two and a third centuries ago — John Dry den was a young aspirant for the laurel wreath. Like many another Englishman of that day, he had changed sides at the Restoration, and since then he had been rather anxiously awaiting the arrival of some fit occasion for cele- brating the greatness and goodness of his new master, Charles II. Since Charles was what he was, the fit occasion was slow in coming; and, rather than wait too long, the young poet was fain to content himself with a series of notable occurrences clustering about the year just past, 1666,— disasters though most of them were, — and to couple with his account of them such fulsome flattery of the king as the gross taste of the time permitted and encouraged. The first in this series of occurrences, and perhaps the most memorable of them all, was the Great Plague of London. The disease was, alas, no new one. From the sixth century on it had moved westward over Europe, like a resistless rising tide, advancing and retreating in a series of tremendous waves, each gaining on its predecessors, until high tide was reached in that awful visitation which in the fourteenth century swept Great Britain, destroying, as is believed, from one-third to one-half of the entire population of the *Eead before the Berkeley Club, February 28, 1901. 156638 island. The deadly tide now ebbed. England, the utmost coast on which its waves could break, was reached less and less frequently, and with less and less violence. But almost the very last wave to reach her shores was a decuman wave, which in 1665 spent its force upon the capital. This visitation was not nearly so widespread, nor in its aggregate so deadly, as that of three hundred years before; yet it was awful enough to have o'erfreighted Dryden's ode with woe, had he included it in his scheme. Fortunately then for his immediate purpose, as well as for England, the plague had pretty well burned itself out in the year preceding the one he chose specially to commemorate, and there was no need to include it. Thus it was left for De Foe, some sixty years later, to take advantage of the interest and terror inspired by the next approaching wave of the plague, and to exploit in genuine modern fashion the greatest portent of all this series. His famous Journal of the Plague Year, though written by one w^ho could have had no personal memory of the events, has all the vividness and convincing reality of the testimony of an eye-witness — which indeed it purports to be, and for which it has been repeatedly mis- taken. The next event, and the one upon which Dryden put his chief effort, as lending itself best to panegjTic of England and of her new rulers, was the war with the Dutch. The naval battles, indeed, which he celebrates, though most stub- bornly fought out on both sides, were inconclusive. Neither the palm of bravery nor of energy nor of skill can be con- fidently awarded to the one rather than to the other. Nor was the immediate advantage overwhelmingly on England's side. But it was a strenuous passage at arras, in which the king, his brother, and his cousin, Prince Rupert, had borne themselves not unworthilj^; and that was foundation enough for fulsome panegyric and for depreciating in regular John Bull fashion the equally high spirit of the foe. What gave the matter its real significance and whatever valid title it had to a place in the Annus Mirahilis, was something other than all this, was something which neither Dry den nor Charles could have really understood: — that this was the second act in that long struggle which Englishmen were to wage with their kinsmen and neighbors for commercial empire; — not merely, as at that moment, in the narrow seas which separated their home-lands, but in America, in India, and in the islands of the sea. Its beginning was the famous Navigation Act of Oliver Cromwell; and its last scene — if indeed it be the last — is now enacting under our eyes in South Africa, But of this more anon. The Great Fire of London, Dryden's other portent, was spectacular indeed, and tremendous enough to those who witnessed it. But in the summing up of England's affairs, we see now that it was of no appreciable weight or impor- tance; and even as regards the city itself, it was of lasting good rather than harm. It destroyed the noisome seed- beds of the plague, and made possible a more sanitary rebuilding, to which, no doubt, London largely owed her subsequent immunity. Such were the wonders of Dryden's wonderful year — wonders spectacular merely, of no far-reaching importance whether in the physical realm or in the moral, at least so far as he or his times discerned them. One matter of really great moment had come, as we have seen, a little too early to fall within the limits of his year, and moreover had failed to lend itself to his immediate purpose. And, shortly after Dryden's poem appeared, another event occurred, not at all with observation, but of importance greater far than any of these — transcending even all else which happened in Charles' reign — the appearance of the Paradise Lost, It was too late for Dry den; and had it been in time, it would have lent itself still less than the Great Plague to the flatterer's use. Better probably than any other man of that time Dryden could have guessed somewhat of its real power and import as an immortal work of art. But even he could not have foreseen how strongly the thought of that blind poet was to shape the imagination and the convictions of 6 generations of men; how Milton's imagery should become the almost inevitable imagery in which men of our race must clothe their thought of that existence and of those realms and powers that lie beyond the veil. Thus strangely do realities, as we are pleased to call them, and mere imaginings sometimes change places! Since then two and a third centuries have slipped away, and again do we find ourselves in a cycle of wonders which this time we make no doubt are really wonders, and no mere commonplaces tricked out in the hues of our own fancies. In one sense, to be sure, there are no wonders. Each thing which a day brings forth has had its founda- tions laid and its opportunity prepared from of old, before there were suns or stars. But while everything thus enters into the "one increasing purpose" which "through the ages runs," while all things in a sense are equally inevitable and equally necessary, not all things are equally impressive. There are crises in the movement when the agencies emerge from the stream of circumstance, and stand visibly forth. There are dramatic moments which really gather up into themselves ten thousand separate, errant impulses, combine them, and launch the resultant forth portentous, irresisti- ble. And at such moments nothing can avail to cheat the human heart of the joy of wonder. Then again, our centuries, as we know, are mere for- tuitous units of measure. We cannot conceive them as having any vital or necessary relation whatever to the great movement and destiny of human affairs. Yet how strange it is that, as we look back over the nineteen hundred years of our era, we find the events of real significance and moment somehow clustering about these milestones which we have set up to keep us from losing our way! There is the first great defeat of the Roman legions under Varus at the very opening of the count — prophetic of long centuries of losing battle for the old world-order, and the passing of the sceptre to a race that should make the world new. There is Constantine and the establishment of Christianity at the third milestone. There is the deluge of northern invasion, and the sack of Rome at the fourth; Theodoric the Goth, Clovis the Frank, and the faint glimmerings of a new order at the fifth; Mohammed and Gregory the Great at the sixth; Charlemagne at the eighth; King Alfred at the ninth; the first Crusade at the eleventh; King John, Magna Charta, and St. Francis at the twelfth; Dante — the "voice of ten silent centuries" — at the thirteenth; Chaucer at the fourteenth; the discovery of America and the re-discovery of the world of classical thought at the fifteenth; Shake- speare and Queen Elizabeth at the sixteenth; the English Revolution at the seventeenth; the French Revolution at the eighteenth; and, most striking of all, the meeting of innumerable streams of human effort, interest, and tendency within the last few years of our own time. Nor does it seem that this impression of the coincidence of the critical nodes of history with the century periods can be wholly illusory, or the mere result of suggestion from our own sentiment or fancy. The instances are too numerous and too vital, explain them how we will. In looking at matters so immediately at hand as these last we have not, of course, the true perspective, and cannot surely discern their importance, absolute or relative. But our interest we cannot withhold, nor can we suspend our judgment altogether. We still must try to read them as we can. Approaching thus the events of recent years, we are aware of a certain increase and heightening in all departments of human affairs. There is an acceleration of movement and a crescendo of volume beginning indeed far back, but rising now with a steepness of curve which speaks a climax at hand. In the realm of science and the industrial arts — to cite but a single example out of scores — there is the advent of the new power of electricity, with its vast range of already demonstrated uses, and its almost infinite possibilities yet in store. So tremendous is our pace that it already seems as if electricity were an old- time servant of man. It takes an effort to recall that, but a score of years ago, the force which drives our thundering chariots, and the fire which kindles our cities with splendid illumination, and sets them like flashing diadems upon the brow of night, was scarcely known outside the laboratory; that but three or four years ago Roentgen rays and wireless telegraphy were things undreamed of. Within this same short period again what developments have we seen, both sinister and benign, of the far-reaching power of human organization and combination — in trusts and in labor- unions, in the Red Cross society, the political boss, and the sympathetic strike! In our own lives, professional, com- mercial, domestic, what quickening of pace, what fierceness of competition, what accession of splendor, of complexity, of care ; — until the lives we ourselves lived in our boyhood now seem to us as slow and as far-away as the days of Methuselah! There are few of my readers, I imagine, who do not remember when the map of Africa was mostly a great white blank ; when the now truculent German Empire was an infant in swaddling clothes; when Italy and Japan were still in the womb of the feudal ages; when it was supposed that the far-shadowing power of Russia might be effectually "cribbed, cabined, and confined" by turning the key of the door at Constantinople. On the last tragic act of Spain's long struggle for colonial empire, the curtain has but just fallen; and but now our own country, parting company with the traditions and maxims on which was nourished her "youth sublime," steps jauntily forth into the race for the self-same prize. But beyond all this general deepening of interest toward the close of the century, there seems to be a special empha- sis laid upon its very last year, so as in some true sort to single it out, and to give it a far better right than Dryden's ever had to the title of Annus Mirabilis. I have no ambi- tion to wear Dryden's laureate wreath, — or even Austin's, his successor longo intervallo; yet in more modest fashion would I venture to set forth the claims of the year 1900 to distinction . Among these claims I do not include that singular dispute, at once fierce and whimsical, which ushered it in, and which raged all the way from peasant to pope, and mayhap still lives— the dispute as to which century it is to which the year rightfully belongs. Indeed, I should not be at all surprised if some of my readers were ready at this moment to take up the cudgels on one side or the other of this famous controversy . But against all such I record my veto . A truce to all such untimely quarrels ! It is enough that it was a year of stirring movement and world-wide surprise, at the end of— and fit to stand in either enumeration at the end of— a century more surprising and more stirring, per- haps, than any other that can be named. In the interest still of peace, though the matter is of graver import, I shall lay no special stress upon a circum- stance which connects our year significantly with Dry den's; namely, the appearance of the plague once more in England and Scotland, to say nothing of places nearer at hand.* The plague had not visited England since Dryden's time, nor any part of western Europe since 1722. Its steadily diminishing area and destructiveness induced the hope that the force of this the deadliest of all epidemics was really spent. But such is found to be by no means the case. And, though we have reason to think that the improved medical skill of our day and improved sanitary science may defend civilized peoples from such horrors as once were common, it is well not to be too confident, and to bear in mind the lessons all too easily forgotten of the plague-scare of the year 1900. Among the other things which combine to make the year really memorable there stands out. first of all, the South African war, the main movement and brunt of which fell within the year, although its beginning was earlier and its end is not yet. The chief dramatic and spectacular interest of that war lay, of course, in the heroic and amaz- *An angry discussion is still going on (Feb., 1901) as to whether the plague did or did not appear in San Francisco during the year 1900. 10 ingly effective defense, raaiutained single-handed and for so long, by a few simple, rural folk against the whole available power of the richest and strongest nation in the world. This interest the conflict always will have, no matter what may be thought of the merits of the question at issue. But this is not all. Whatever may be its final outcome, it seems certain that this war is the last and most tremendous act in that long drama of strife for commercial and colonial advantage between English and Dutch, the beginnings of which date back, as we have seen, to Crom- well and Charles — so strangely and indivisibly are things far and near bound up in the same bundle of fate! The last act this surely must be, because at home the Dutch have long since withdrawn from the "swagger set" of Europe, and are there secure in their lowliness and the consequent protection of their stronger neighbors. The few colonial interests they still retain are probablj'^ safe under the same guarantee. And nowhere more in the world can there be found a detached mass of Dutch folk so circumstanced as to tempt or to provoke attack. The war is memorable again from yet another point of view. Quite up to within our own life-time Africa has been almost the only remaining exemplar and stronghold of a world-order that dates back far beyond the dawn of history. Throughout the w^hole continent, with the exception of Egypt and an intermittent fringe of areas along her coast, there flourished in all its fierce glory the great Mammalian Age, — in its characters and marks essentially the same as that whose records are elsewhere read in the rocks, and which in Europe, Asia, and America passed away untold centuries ago before the rising power and competition of man. Within the remembrance of the youngest of us the elephant and the rhinoceros roamed over the plains of Africa, or crashed their way through her trackless jungles. The hippopotamus and the crocodile swam her rivers. Apes, baboons, and gorillas peopled the tree-tops. Count- less herds of wild cattle, camelopards, deer, and gazelles 11 ranged over the veldt or browsed in the thickets, furnishing food to jackals, hyenas, leopards, and to the lion, king and master of them all. In the midst of all this fierce and teeming life, himself a part of it, hunting and hunted, fiercer and wilder than any, lived also man, not yet so far emerged as to master and subdue it, or to subdue and master himself. " Dragons of the prime, That tare each other in their slime, Were mellow music matched with him ! ' ' How much longer this state of affairs might have lasted we know not, had it not everywhere been broken in upon and disturbed by the modern spirit of adventure, by exploitation of all sorts in the interest of commercialism armed with modern resources and weapons, and by the eager competi- tion of European powers. Against this invasion and transformation the Boers deliberately set themselves, when they sullenl}^ harnessed their ox-teams, and turned their backs forever, as they hoped, on the new order of things and on the English as its chief exponents. Profiting by the added power and resource which the touch of civilization had given them, they would preserve that savage age, that old-world order, for themselves intact, or at least no further modified than the conditions of their own life rendered inevitable. Thus they became an effective and organized barrier directly in the way of the march of the new order of things. They became, in fact, the onhj effective barrier; for forests, mountains, rivers, deserts, disease, and savage man himself offer but slight resistance to the determined onset of civilization. But this barrier was quite of another sort, as the event has proved. And now that it too has gone down in ruin before the ever-rising tide, we cannot but lament the destruction of that brave and steadfast, though misguided, folk, who flung themselves thus in the pathway of fate. We cannot but denounce the unholy greed and chicane which at last precipitated the conflict. We cannot but wish that some kindlier way had been found to change 12 the settled resolution of those men. But as long as the resolution held, sooner or later, with pretext or without it, the conflict was inevitable; and of the conflict there could be but one issue. No human barrier can stand against such an ever-rising tide; — nor ought we to wish it to stand. It was in the order of nature that it should give way. So viewing the matter, I doubt not that the South African war, hateful as indeed it is, will finally take its place as one of the most dramatic and conspicuous crises in the fading away of the old order from the last quarter of the globe, and the incoming of the new. Yet "Woe unto the world because of offences," says the good book, "for it must needs be that offences come. But woe to that man by whom the offence eometh!" The war into which England so jauntily entered has proved to be one of the most serious crises in all her recent career. It had not progressed far before it became apparent that her prestige in the face of the world was at stake, and after that her empire itself. With unflinching determination and superb hauteur she addressed herself to meet the emergency. Such a magnificent single exhibition of power I doubt whether the world has ever seen. To wipe out the disasters and blunders of the opening campaign, she sent 270,000 fighting men to the antipodes, with the most distinguished of all her soldiers to lead them; and there they are still engaged. Five hundred millions of treasure spent, not counting that which war has destroyed; seventy thousand of her sons killed, wounded, dead of disease, or invalided home; — and all as yet unavailing either to hold in security the territory overrun, or to defend from invasion Cape Colony itself. The tremendous strain of the effort is seen in the nervousness of the English public, its lack of com- posure in the face of trifling reverses, its hysterical welcome of returning troops, its threats of stern reckoning some day with those who have brought England to such a pass; it is seen in the unexampled and anxious alacrity with which England's daughters have hastened to strengthen her 13 hands. Not victorious yet is she, but never so splendid and so terrible as in this her hour of supreme effort and supreme need. And what if it should turn out, as indeed it may, that this is in very truth her supreme effort? What if, when the subjugation is complete, it should mark the very turning-point in England's career? Outside of her own family England is nowhere beloved in the world . Not merely her pride — her very success has gained her enemies on every hand. She still keeps her place in the lead, but with visibly greater effort and with sharper competition. What if the legacies of bitterness and hate growing out of this very war, the added jealousies and complications on the part of her neighbors, the lasting strain of reorganization and control should together suffice to turn the trembling bal- ance slowly against her? What if Africa should be, as has been prophesied, the grave of the British Empire? Absif omen! Yet such things have been. Should it be so, — should the future historian point to this very year 1900 as the climax of England's power and the beginning of her decline, then would it be an Annus MiraMlis indeed. On these last lines the ink was not dry when tidings from across the ocean made it seem as if Death himself had set his seal upon the distinctions of the year by making it the last of the longest and most memorable reign in the annals of England, — perhaps the most memorable in the annals of the world. Though the physical life of the great queen outlasted by some brief days the wonderful century with which she was so signally identified, and the wonder- ful year of its close, yet the century was for her the real terminus. Her last public act was to welcome home, doubt- less from his last campaign, the great soldier who on the stricken fields of two continents had led to victory her "far- flung battle line;" — and so soon it was his duty to lead the solemn funeral pomp which bore her away to the tomb! Fifty years before, while her reign was still young, Wellington was laid to rest — 14 "in streaming London's central roar, Where the sound of those he wrought for And the feet of tliose he fought for Echo round his tomb forevermore." And fifty years before that was Nelson. "O eloquent, just, and mighty Death ! " While one ancient order is passing awaj' in Africa, another less ancient to be sure, but of far greater human interest, is passing away in China. In Africa it was the oldest biological order anywhere extant on so grand a scale; in China, the oldest organized civilization that yet survives in the world . In outward features the Chinese Empire belongs to the same old-world order as did AssjTia or Persia or Babylon. It is the same huge aggregation of loosely-coher- ent provinces ruled by great satraps or viceroys in very uncertain dependence upon the central power. There is the same Babel of tongues, even though the tongues be closely related. There is the same absence of national feeling, national ideals, and national loyalty. There is the same eternal dominance of intrigue as the prime motive force in civil life and government. On the other hand, China is singularly unlike all those in its strong unity of stock or race, and in its remarkable identity throughout in traditions, in prepossessions, and especially in literature, in ideals of life and character, and in habits of thought and action. Not only so; this remarkable unity has survived conquests and changes of dynasty, and is, no doubt, in part the cause, and in part the effect of the surprising endurance of the Chinese order, while all others of its type have passed away. China and Africa have thus become, though in different senses, the two remaining strongholds of the past in a world which is elsewhere new. By her vast mass and inertia, as well as by her lodged and settled hatred of inno- vation, China, like Africa, has found herself directly in the way of the modern movement and idea — a huge sand-bank sapped by the waves of an ever-rising tide. Because of the special lines on which early European trade was developed, 15 because of the higher rank of her productions, and because she was a definite organization, China was brought earlier than Africa into the stress of conflict and struggle. The first note of it was sounded in the advent of the Portuguese nearly tour centuries ago. The acute stage was reached nearly a hundred years ago when an English embassador at Pekin was driven forth with contumely, for refusing to acknowledge that his sovereign was a vassal of the Emperor of China. And now at the century's close has come the catastrophe with a crash that has shaken the world. It seems more than a striking coincidence that here too the precise point of rupture was the right of embassy. It is rather another startling result and token of the profound isolation of the Chinese system from the thoughts and ideas of the great world about it. It is another striking demon- stration of the irrepressible conflict between it and that instinct of modern civilization which everywhere, and as its first condition, demands freedom of intercourse and of movement. The appalling events of the great outbreak of 1900, and the yet more appalling events which have followed in its train, there is surely no need to recount here. And of these also the end is not yet, nor can the keenest vision discern what the precise outcome shall be. But that it is the catastrophe which we are contemplating, and not merely some passing accident, few any longer doubt. Few now have any lingering thought that the outcome may be the reestablishment of the old order. Whatever form reconstruction may take, we may be sure that the new order of ideas, and not the old, will rule it. In this connection I cannot forbear to speak of a ten- dency of feeling and of utterance in our midst, which has of late been greatly accentuated, and which to some at least is a matter of great surprise, if not of grave concern. "My kingdom is not of this world" said the Nazarene when questioned as to a possible appeal to force in support of his doctrine. "Put up thy sword again into his place," he said 16 to an overzealous friend who would openly make that appeal; — "all they that take the sword shall perish by the sword." And again, "Blessed are the meek, for they shall inherit the earth; " and "Love your enemies, bless them that curse you, do good to them that hate you, and pray for them that despitef ully use you and persecute you ; that ye may be the children of your Father which is in heaven." Though the lesson is a hard one, it seemed as though at last the followers of the meek and lowly Jesus were beginning to take it to heart. The church, and especially its ministers, it was felt, w^ere permanently pledged to the cause of peace, and could not consistently be found among those who clamor for vengeance or openly fan the passions which lead to war and bloodshed. Yet in our country, at least, all this seems to have been changed within these last few years. I fear it is not too much to say that the body of our American clergy was prompt and eager to urge on this nation into w^ar with Spain. There were, of course, many and noble exceptions. But so far as my observation and impressions go, that minister was the exception who lifted up his voice in protest; and that religious paper was the exception which did not, and which does not now, defend it. Was it a wave of popular enthusi- asm which swept them from their moorings? Was it specious sentiment? Was it the traditional Puritanic hatred of all things Roman? Or shall we be told that herein is no real paradox at all? I know not. And now throughout all this dreadful business in the Philippines and this more dreadful business in China, almost the only voice we hear, whether from missionaries in the field or from their supporters here at home, is the constant demand for more force, greater severity, harder conditions, more blood. The ease is one which excites wonderment in the onlookers, even among those who are glad to find this unlooked-for support in their schemes of conquest. But are the gentleness and love which Christ preached so long ago now antiquated, and are fierce- ness and vengeance to take their place! Was Mohammed 17 right after all? I cannot undertake to answer these questions nor to explain this not the least surprise of the century- closing year. Yet while the tragic and somber phase of this tremendous drama in China has occupied our chief attention, its exi- gencies have brought into counterplay a movement and tendenc}^ which seems to me prophetic not of downfall and doom, but of hope — a new and larger hope for the world. The great old-time civilizations were all separative, divisive. Each conceived and developed in practical isolation one, single master-idea. The Hebrew idea of righteousness, the Greek idea of intelligence and ordered beauty, the Roman idea of social organization were thus separately worked out. It required the whole lifetime of a great race or nation, and all its genius, to bring one of these ideas to such clearness and perfection as to permit of its being passed on to others, and so becoming part of the inheritance of the ages. Each civilization developed its idea as far as it could be developed alone. Yet each idea was after all but a partial one, in itself insufficient for the basis of a complete and lasting civilization. Each needed the support and help of all the others before there could be a perfect society. Indeed, it was precisely because of the lack of complementary and supporting ideas that each of these old civilizations was doomed to fade away. The problem of the ancient world was therefore the discovery and the development of these master-ideas singly. The problem of the modern world is the combination and adjustment of them to make a com- plete and sufficient basis for a permanent human society. The Roman was the last effective civilization of the ancient world — the last one able to impress its idea upon the world that was to be. And its idea, the idea of an effective human organization, was developed in such imposing grandeur that, during the long centuries which followed its downfall, that idea still dominated the hearts and thoughts of men. The efforts of the Middle Age were for the most part pathetically ineffective. They were like 18 the efforts and struggles of men in dreams. But the dreams of the Middle Age were true to its own nature and character; they were grandiose, romantic. And at the heart of them all was the Roman universality — the conception of an all-embracing unity. During that feverish night and troubled dawn the Middle Age had three such splendid visions. And though they came sadly short of realization in actual practice, those dreams were truly prophetic, and are still to us of these latter days the hope and the promise of the world. The first was the dream of an all-embracing unity and organization of spiritual life — a church of which every man born into the world should be a member — the Holy Catholic Church. Its second was the dream of a world- embracing civil order of which every man should be a citizen, — the Holy Roman Empire. And the third, its dream just before dawn, and so, according to the old belief, destined to a nearer fulfillment, was the dream of a world- wide fraternity of the sons of light — of souls whom the truth had made free — the University. The conception of the University was that of a State — a civitas, as its diplomas still attest; a republic not of this world, but of the world of ideas. Its local institutions were to be but chapters of a universal society. Its members were to be really free as were no other men. By virtue of their common language they were actually free from the heavy curse of Babel. By virtue of their superior illumination which should make them a law unto themselves, they were to be actually free in large measure from the trammels of the civil law, made only for knaves and fools. And, best of all, their spirits were to be free — free to think, to learn, to know. But when the modern day at last broke, organization and civilization had to begin on a scale much smaller than that of these dreams. For many centuries the nation was to be the largest whole with which human effort could suc- cessfully grapple. As the modern nationalities one after another emerged from chaos, each was forced to work out its own civilization very much by itself. Each had to make 19 its own adjustment of these master-ideas under its own peculiar conditions, and in accordance with its own peculiar genius and limitations. And nations differ not merely in natural gifts and advantages, but in age and in experience as well. Germany, Italy, and Japan were born into the family within our remembrance. Furthermore, the very virtues of nationality, — loyalty and patriotism, — operate as barriers to sjTupathy and the free play of ideas quite as much as do the commercial and material discriminations which national competition imposes. It is plain, therefore, that in the present — the national — stage of civilization there still is, and must be, much that is separative, divisive, partial. And yet in spite of the provinciality, the jealousy, the Philistinism of our modern world, one feels that civil- ization, wherever it now exists, is after all one, and not many as was the case in the ancient world. And there have been of late intimations not a few that the growth of the free spirit of man cannot much longer be kept within the limits of the national phase of organization. Such lim- itation was indeed necessary, and has been of immense advantage at the start. The nation was the seed-bed, the nursery; but the field is the world. Beyond the nation on every side stretches humanity itself , transcendent, limitless. Civilization can never be complete or perfect for any until all are partakers. The separate seed-plants must grow to touch and support one another, must cover the whole earth with their shadow before the golden harvest can really ripen or be gathered. This it was toward which the dumb heart of the Middle Age so strangely yearned, and which for one group of men it so nearly realized in its University. This it is which for the same group is now realized in the almost absolute com- munity in spirit of the truly cultured and learned through- out the world. This idea was the vital and lasting element in that profound and far-reaching stir of human life which we miscall the French Revolution. This is what prompted the wonderful missionary activity of the century just closed. 20 This it is which in recent times has caused a constant enlargement of the realm of international law and of inter- national activity and cooperation of all sorts; such as the federation of the Australian Colonies just consummated. This is bringing about the gradual dawn of a world-con- sciousness and a world-conscience, as seen in the Red Cross Society and the Peace Conference at the Hague. But not less significant and impressive than these was the prompt and instinctive rallying of all the great powers of civiliza- tion as one man to meet the emergency in China. That emergency portended no appreciable danger to those great powers as separate nations, for it could not reach them; — much less a danger to their united force. But the Boxer movement, by its determined stand against intercourse and against ideas, far more than by its lawlessness and violence, was a menace and a defiance to the spirit of civilization itself. This, I take it, was the real issue, and this the ground of that unexampled unanimity of impulse which astonished the world. The true significance of that common impulse is not, in my view, altered at all by the greed and violence on the part of civilized nations which goaded into frenzy those unhappy people, and so precipitated the event, nor by the pillaging and wanton cruelty which seem to have disgraced the military operations, nor even by the selfish- ness which now seems certain to determine the immmediate outcome. That the instinct of civilization should so assert itself, — should, though for one brief moment, so over- shadow national jealousies and self-seeking, — is indeed memorable, prophetic. Such, all too hastily and meagerly set forth, are some of the thoughts which come surging to mind as one turns to gaze upon the solemn pomp of the great year just past, and listens to its trumpet-note still echoing to remind us that "the old order changeth, yielding place to new." It is much to have lived through such a year with heart and soul at all awake to its true import. It is more to have come, as most of ray readers have done, to such a year as the 21 climax and crown of a long procession of such years of ever- increasing volume and power; — years watched with eager interest as thej-^ swept grandly by, and still vividly real in memory and imagination. But happiest of all is the lot of those who, having looked with us as from Mt. Pisgah upon the promised land, are also privileged to enter in and possess it. The Century is dead. Long live the Century! Be it for us longer or shorter, from memories and musings such as these we turn with new courage to the hope set before us — the hope of a new world, "Clasp, Angel of the backward look And folded wings of ashen gray And voice of echoes far away, The brazen covers of thy book ; The weird palimpsest old and vast Wherein thou hid'st the spectral past ; Where closely mingling pale and glow The characters of joy or woe ; The monographs of outlived years Or smile-illumed or dim with tears. Even while I look, I can but heed The restless sands' incessant fall. Importunate hours that hours suceed, Each clamorous with its own sharp need. And duty keeping pace with all. Shut down and clasp the heavy lids ; I hear again the voice that bids The dreamer leave his dream midway For larger hopes and graver fears : Life greatens in these later years, The century's aloe flowers to-day!" OK THE \ UNIVERS OF X CO g 186638 •■ V..- ■•*•;.•• '-Ik.: r-\'s'^- .''''■■ S'!^fe::>' ' J .'"'''>.v?-i'-*iif* ■■■■'V ^^ ^