UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA COLLEGE OF AGRICULTURE AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION BERKELEY, CALIFORNIA CIRCULAR No. 284 April, 1925 THE ALMOND IN CALIFORNIA By R. H. TAYLOR and G. L. PHILP INTRODUCTION The almond (Prunus communis) is supposed to be native to the countries around the Mediterranean. It is related to the peach which it resembles in manner of growth and character of blossoms and leaves. The wood, however, is much harder and the tree lives longer under equally favorable conditions. The fruit Jias a thin, leathery pericarp or hull, which corresponds to the thick, fleshy portion of the peach, and which splits upon ripening and generally opens when dry, exposing the nut inside. ALMOND PRODUCTION AND DISTRICTS The production of almonds in the United States is confined almost entirely to California, where over 99 per cent of the crop is raised. With the 1915 crop the production entered upon what appears to be a long prospective increase. The large acreage of almonds set out in the past few years is the result of greatly improved market con- ditions which are due to the successful work of the California Almond Growers' Exchange. According to recent figures, 1 there are now approximately 100,000 acres of bearing and non-bearing trees and large acreages are still being planted. Table 1 gives, by counties, the comparison of the number of acres in bearing in 1909, with the bearing and non-bearing acreages for 1923. * This circular is a revision, by the junior author, of California Agr. Exp. Sta. Bull. 297, by R. H. Taylor. i California Crop Eeport, Calif. State Dept. Agr., Special Publication 43, p. 21, 1924. 2 UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA EXPERIMENT STATION TABLE 1 Comparison of Bearing Acres of Almonds in the Various Counties in 19092 with the Bearing and Non-Bearing Acres in 1923 Bearing acres, Bearing acres, Non-bearing acres, County 1909 1923 1923 Alameda 246 400 Amador 14 7 Butte 1051 5133 572 Calaveras 23 7 Colusa 201 3200 5900 Contra Costa 2613 2500 522 Fresno 84 167 Glenn 359 2703 217 Kern 170 80 Kings 15 5 Lake 103 300 346 Los Angeles 962 1062 166 Madera 141 108 Marin 10 7 Mendocino 11 Merced 214 3321 599 Monterey 2400 150 Napa 234 20 23 Placer 144 389 20 Riverside 272 1432 53 Sacramento 829 2376 551 San Benito 87 130 8 331 26 San Bernardino 7 San Diego 185 San Joaquin 1212 5592 481 San Luis Obispo 116 8489 21,987 San Mateo 323 6 2 200 60 4 Santa Barbara 1 Santa Clara 160 Shasta Siskiyou 3 3 Solano 1228 1776 126 Sonoma 25 15 Stanislaus 421 4170 1080 Sutter 769 2090 32 Tehama 411 662 24 Tulare 832 731 46 Ventura 57 Yolo 1862 5554 2000 Yuba 39 290 60 All other counties 827 The State 14,541 56,646 35,794* * Estimated acreage planted in state, 1923, 5,921 not included. 2 Figures for 144, 1919. 1909 from Calif. State Board of Hort., Mo. Bull., vol. 8, no. 4, Circ. 284] THE ALMOND IN CALIFORNIA It is interesting to note that the bearing acreage is confined mainly to the upper part of the great interior valley, extending from Tehama County on the north to Merced County on the south. The largest proportion of the non-bearing acreage is confined to San Luis Obispo County, where the almond is being extensively planted. Figure 1 shows the location of the almond plantings. .S ( S K I YOU MODOC FT S H A S T A I l ' T E H _A ^ t *1 •\l ALMONDS ACREAGE III CALIFORNIA EACH DOT = 500 ACHES. Leading Counties by acres: San Luis Obispo 30,476 Colusa 9,100 Yolo 7,544 San Joaquin 6,073 Butte 5,705 THE STATB (Bearing) 56,646 (Non-bearing) 35,794 * X V SJPSSX& 1 f \ ° \ From California Crop •^llV'o° tUMNE A^ *\ Report - 1923 N -V V V \ Leading Counties Based on Average Pro due- tion nta barbaraI *V \ SAN B ERNARO I N 1st. Butte 2nd. Yolo 3rd. (San Joaquin (San Luis Obispo 8th. Colusa From California Crop Reporting Service June 3, 1924. IMPERIAL Fig. 1. — Outline map of California showing the almond acreage by counties. Each dot represents 500 acres. The leading counties based on average production are also listed. While California produces practically all the almonds grown in the United States, there are millions of pounds imported into this country every year. Table 2 gives the quantities of almonds brought into the United States during the years 1917 to 1923, inclusive : UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA EXPERIMENT STATION TABLE 2 Almond Imports. Crops of 1917 to 1923a Imports for Crops of Pounds Unshelled Pounds Shelled Total pounds 1917-18 1917 1918 1919 1920 1921 1922 4,278,990 6,733,512 7,355,894 6,622,340 4,637,002 4,719,348 19,561,155 23,594,915 26,326,245 13,816,044 26,705,621 22,973,337 23,840,145 30,328,427 1918-19 1919-20 33,682,139 1920-21 20,438,384 1921-22 31,342,623 1922-23 27,692,685 Since the cost of producing almonds in Europe and of transport- ing them to the Atlantic seaboard is low, the Californian grower must become thoroughly familiar with the most economical methods of production and marketing. HABITS The almond is the first of the deciduous fruit trees to start growth and come into bloom in the spring, and is normally the last one to shed its leaves in the fall. In other words, it has a very short period of rest. When the trees are forced into premature dormancy by mites or lack of moisture, they reach the end of their normal rest period before the winter season is over. Then the first warm weather in spring will bring the trees into bloom. In some cases where moisture and temperature conditions are favorable late in the fall, they may actually blossom before the winter season begins. In young trees that have become dormant unusually early, the rest period may term- inate and the tips of the branches resume growth and continue slowly to develop new leaves at the terminals throughout the winter. Trees which have been kept growing until the leaves have been forced to fall by the cold weather and frosts of winter, do not usually blossom so early in the spring. Young trees blossom somewhat later than older ones, and buds on sucker growth blossom later than those on the more mature portions of the same tree. The difference may amount to three or four days or almost a week. Well grown trees carry large numbers of blossoms over the entire tree. 3 Figures from the California Almond Growers ' Exchange. ClRC. 284] THE almond IN CALIFORNIA 5 The wood of the almond is very hard and strong, enabling the tree to bear the weight of heavy crops where proper pruning has been given during the first years of growth. As with other fruit trees, the almond is subject to heart-rot and needs care to prevent the check- ing and cracking of large wounds and consequent infection with decay organisms. The hardness of the wood makes it excellent fuel, and when old orchards are being dug up, the returns from the sale of wood often more than pay for the expense of digging and cutting up the trees and burning the brush. The nuts are of two general classes — sweet and bitter. The former is primarily the almond of commerce, though the latter is used largely in the manufacture of almond oil and almond flavoring, as well as in the manufacture of prussic acid. The bitter almond is also much used in nurseries as a rootstock upon which to bud the almond and some other fruits. FACTORS LIMITING PRODUCTION While the almond is in many ways an easy tree to grow it is rather particular in certain pollination, climatic, and soil require- ments. POLLINATION Tufts and Philp 4 found that all of the varieties of almonds they tested are self-sterile. This list includes the Big White Flat, Califor- nia, Drake, Eureka, Golden State, Harriott, I. X. L., Jordan, King, Klondike, Languedoc, Lewelling, Ne Plus Ultra, Nonpareil, Peerless, Princess, Reams, Sellers, Silver Shell, and Texas. In addition certain almond varieties are inter-sterile. For example, the I. X. L. and the Nonpareil proved practically inter- sterile. The Languedoc and the Texas are inter-sterile as shown by two seasons' work. In order to insure cross-pollination it is necessary therefore to interplant varieties which not only are inter-fertile but blossom at about the same time. The accompanying chart (fig. 2) gives the average blooming periods of certain almond varieties. The date of bloom is of course dependent upon many factors, such as soil, season, and location. 4 Tufts, W. P., and Philp, G. L., California Agr. Exp. Sta., Bull. 346, 1922. UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA EXPERIMENT STATION M a iO ! w ^ \ - lU b lZ £ -1- r- i { " zB: U-J _j iS 1 — — « M~ C£ ^ -* . _ _ ■_ rr -S ° ■ <4 i K ^ s ? 5 S _> -— cl_ ^ __ : ~ :: :: _. ..; : :. ; i : : ~ : u. -^ <^i y 2 a y ; i k ; s ! g g g C^ C7} 3 ^ _J1 "■ g TT — - " - ^ 1 o p m> _ m 5- K _. _ _ _. _. _ "- W~ ~ ~ ^- __ S _. _ _ . _ __ ._ _. _ ... .. _■ -J ^ • S t K 1 ^-r — > ■ H uJ ok<= ~B- O **- §ee i> z2 ST - cS ^ S^ Q nf O 7^*-* 111 ^ , > - *— 2? CT rS" 9 r5~ r\ P\ V * 1 c^ z g 5= c ^ _l iu iu C£ C£ =! C.aJ uj oJ Circ. 284] THE ALMOND IN CALIFORNIA Figure 3 gives the period of effective bloom of certain almond varieties for the year 1917 growing under the same conditions. Satisfactory pollinizers for various varieties are listed below : 1. For California — Nonpareil and Drake. 2. For Drake — California, Ne Plus Ultra, Nonpareil, and Texas. 3. For Eureka — Nonpareil. 4. For Harriott — Ne Plus Ultra. 5. For I. X. L.— Ne Plus Ultra. 6. For Languedoc — Drake. Period oJ Effective FEBRUARY fcl OJJC ming c f Almonclj- MARCH Ui\i\ erji ty K\riT| - -m7. 12 13 14 15 lb 17 18 1? 20 21 22|23[2^|25 Zb 27!es 1 213 h 5 V' *. • A ■ mmm** fe-^S*^ Fig. 19. — Almond varieties. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The writers desire to express their appreciation to the California Almond Growers' Exchange, and to Mr. M. N. Wood, Pomologist, U. S. Department of Agriculture, who have provided certain data and given helpful suggestions, and to acknowledge the help and sugges- tions received from Dr. W. L. Howard, who gave valuable assistance in the preparation of the manuscript. STATION PUBLICATIONS AVAILABLE FOR FRPJE DISTRIBUTION BULLETINS No. No. 253. Irrigation and Soil Conditions in the 352. Sierra Nevada Foothills, California. 261. Melaxuma of the Walnut, "Juglans 353. regia." 354. 262. Citrus Diseases of Florida and Cuba 357. Compared with Those of California. 263. Size Grades for Ripe Olives. 268. Growing and Grafting Olive Seedlings. 358. 273. Preliminary Report on Kearney Vine- yard Experimental Drain. 359. 275. The Cultivation of Belladonna in Cali- 361. fornia. 276. The Pomegranate. 362. 277. Sudan Grass 363. 278. Grain Sorghums. 279. Irrigation of Rice in California. 364. 280. Irrigation of Alfalfa in the Sacramento Valley. 366. 283. The Olive Insects of California. 285. The Milk Goat in California. 367. 286. Commercial Fertilizers. 294. Bean Culture in California. 368. 304. A Study of the Effects of Freezes on Citrus in California. 369. 310. Plum Pollination. 370. 312. Mariout Barley. 371. 313. Pruning Young Deciduous Fruit Trees. 319. Caprifigs and Caprification. 372. 324. Storage of Perishable Fruit at Freezing Temperatures. 374. 325. Rice Irrigation Measurements and Ex- periments in Sacramento Valley, 1914-1919. 375. 328. Prune Growing in California. 331. Phylloxera-Resistant Stocks. 376. 334. Preliminary Volume Tables for Second- Growth Redwood. 377. 335. Cocoanut Meal as a Feed for Dairy 379. Cows and Other Livestock. 380. 339. The Relative Cost of Making Logs from Small and Large Timber. 381. 340. Control of the Pocket Gopher in Cali- fornia. 382. 343. Cheese Pests and Their Control. 344. Cold Storage as an Aid to the Market- 383. ing of Plums. 346. Almond Pollination. 384. 347. The Control of Red Spiders in Decidu- ous Orchards. 348. Pruning Young Olive Trees. 385. 349. A Study of Sidedraft and Tractor 386. Hitches. 350. Agriculture in Cut-over Redwood Lands. Further Experiments in Plum Pollina- tion. Bovine Infectious Abortion. Results of Rice Experiments in 1922. A Self-mixing Dusting Machine for Applying Dry Insecticides and Fungicides. Black Measles, Water Berries, and Related Vine Troubles. Fruit Beverage Investigations. Preliminary Yield Tables for Second Growth Redwood. Dust and the Tractor Engine. The Pruning of Citrus Trees in Cali- fornia. Fungicidal Dusts for the Control of Bunt. Turkish Tobacco Culture, Curing and Marketing. Methods of Harvesting and Irrigation in Relation to Mouldy Walnuts. Bacterial Decomposition of Olives dur- ing Pickling. Comparison of Woods for Butter Boxes. Browning of Yellow Newtown Apples. The Relative Cost of Yarding Small and Large Timber. The Cost of Producing Market Milk and Butterfat on 246 California Dairies. A Survey of Orchard Practices in the Citrus Industry of Southern Cali- fornia. Results of Rice Experiments at Cor- tena, 1923. Sun-Drying and Dehydration of Wal- nuts. The Cold Storage of Pears. Walnut Culture in California. Growth of Eucalyptus in California Plantations. Growing and Handling Asparagus Crowns. Pumping for Drainage in the San Joaquin Valley, California. Monilia Blossom Blight (Brown Rot) of Apricot. A Study of the Relative Values of Cer- tain Succulent Feeds and Alfalfa Meal as Sourses of Vitamin A for Poultry. Pollination of the Sweet Cherry. Pruning Bearing Deciduous Fruit Trees. CIRCULARS No. No. 87. Alfalfa. 155. 113. Correspondence Courses in Agriculture. 157. 117. The Selection and Cost of a Small 160. Pumping Plant. 161. 127. House Fumigation. 164. 129. The Control of Citrus Insects. 165. 136. Melilotus indira as a Green-Manure Crop for California. 166. 144. Oidium or Powdery Mildew of the Vine. 167. 151. Feeding and Management of Hogs. 170. 152. Some Observations on the Bulk Hand- ling of Grain in California. 173. 154. Irrigation Practice in Growing Small Fruit in California. 178. Bovine Tuberculosis. Control of the Pear Scab. Lettuce Growing in California. Potatoes in California. Small Fruit Culture in California. Fundamentals of Sugar Beet Culture under California Conditions. The County Farm Bureau. Feeding Stuffs of Minor Importance. Fertilizing California Soils for the 1918 Crop. The Construction of the Wood-Hoop Silo. The Packing of Apples in California. CIRCULARS — {Continued) No. 179. 184. 190. 199. 202. 203. 208. 209. 210. 212. 214. 215. 217. 220. 228. 231. 232. 233. 234. 235. 236. 237. 238. 239. 240. 241. 243. 244. 245. 247. 248. 249. 250. Factors of Importance in Producing Milk of Low Bacterial Count. A Flock of Sheep on the Farm. Agriculture Clubs in California. Onion Growing in California. County Organizations for Rural Fire Control. Peat as a Manure Substitute. Summary of the Annual Reports of the Farm Advisors of California. The Function of the Farm Bureau. Suggestions to the Settler in California. Salvaging Rain-Damaged Prunes. Seed Treatment for the Prevention of Cereal Smuts. Feeding Dairy Cows in California. Methods for Marketing Vegetables in California. Unfermented Fruit Juices. Vineyard Irrigation in Arid Climates. The Home Vineyard. Harvesting and Handling California Cherries for Eastern Shipment. Artificial Incubation. Winter Injury to Young Walnut Trees during 1921-22. Soil Analysis and Soil and Plant Inter- relations. The Common Hawks and Owls of Cali- fornia from the Standpoint of the Rancher. Directions for the Tanning and Dress- of Furs. The Apricot in California. Harvesting and Handling Apricots and Plums for Eastern Shipment. Harvesting and Handling Pears for Eastern Shipment. Harvesting and Handling Peaches for Eastern Shipment. Marmalade Juice and Jelly Juice from Citrus Fruits. Central Wire Bracing for Fruit Trees. Vine Pruning Systems. Colonization and Rural Development. Some Common Errors in Vine Pruning and Their Remedies. Replacing Missing Vines. Measurement of Irrigation Water on the Farm. No. 251. 252. 253. 254. 255. 256. 257. 258. 259. 260. 261. 262. 263. 264. 265. 266. 267. 268. 269. 270. 271. 272. 273. 275. 276. 277. 278. 279. 281. 282. Recommendations Concerning the Com- mon Diseases and Parasites of Poultry in California. Supports for Vines. Vineyard Plans. The Use of Artificial Light to Increase Winter Egg Production. Leguminous Plants as Organic Fertil- izer in California Agriculture. The Control of Wild Morning Glory. The Small-Seeded Horse Bean. Thinning Deciduous Fruits. Pear By-products. A Selected List of References Relating to Irrigation in California. Sewing Grain Sacks. Cabbage Growing in California. Tomato Production in California. Preliminary Essentials to Bovine Tuber- culosis Control. Plant Disease and Pest Control. Analyzing the Citrus Orchard by Means of Simple Tree Records. The Tendency of Tractors to Rise in Front; Causes and Remedies. Inexpensive Lavor-saving Poultry Ap- pliances. An Orchard Brush Burner. A Farm Septic Tank. Brooding Chicks Artificially. California Farm Tenancy and Methods of Leasing. Saving the Gophered Citrus Tree. Marketable California Decorative Greens. Home Canning. Head, Cane, and Cordon Pruning of Vines. Olive Pickling in Mediterranean Coun- tries. The Preparation and Refining of Olive Oil in Southern Europe. The Results of a Survey to Determine the Cost of Producing Beef in Cali- fornia. Prevention of Insect Attack on Stored Grain. The publications listed above may be had by addressing College of Agriculture, University of California, Berkeley, California. 15m-4,'25