THE LIBRARY OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES GIFT OF Kenneth Macgowan ' ROMAIN HOLLAND JEAN-CHRISTOPHE, $1.75 net JEAN-CHRISTOPHE: IN PABJS, $1.75 net JEAN-CHRISTOPHE: JOURNEY'S END, $1.75 net The set % morocco, boxed $10.00 net SOME MUSICIANS OF FORMER DATS, $1.50 net SOUK MUSICIANS OF TODAY, $1.50 net BEETHOVEN. With supplementary analysis of his works by A. Eaglefield Hull, $1.50 net HANDEL, $1.50 net THE PEOPLE'S THKATHK. Translated by Barrett H. Clark, $1.25 BARRETT H. CLARK THE CONTINENTAL DRAMA OF TODAY: OUTLINES FOB ITS STUDY, $1.75 net THE BRITISH AND AMERICAN DRAMA OF TODAY: OUTLINES FOR THEIR STUDY, $1.75 net THREE MODERN PLAYS FROM THE FRENCH. Edited by Barrett H. Clark, $1.75 net HENRY HOLT AND COMPANY NEW YORK CITY THE FOURTEENTH OF JULY AND DANTON TWO PLAYS OF THE FRENCH REVOLUTION BY ROMAIN HOLLAND AUTHORIZED TRANSLATION WITH A PREPACK BT BARRETT H. CLARK COPTRIOHT, 1918, BT HENRY HOLT AND COMPANY TMI aum* * lOBtN co. mt RAHWAT. N. J. College Library CONTENTS SMI ROMAIN HOLLAND AND THE PEOPLE'S THEATER . 8 THE FOURTEENTH OF JULY 18 (Le 14 Juillet) DANTON jgg (Danton) ROMAIN HOLLAND AND THE PEOPLE'S THEATER IT is perhaps a little surprising to learn that the author of Jean-Christophe has written at least sixteen full-length plays. Most of these, it is true, antedate the publication of the first parts of his epoch-making novel, but since nothing that comes from the brain of Remain Holland can fail to possess significance and interest, a brief inquiry into his dramatic writings and theories on the drama will reveal an aspect of the man which has hitherto strangely enough scarcely been touched upon. His plays for a people's theater, and his book of projects, are as integral a part of his development as Jean-Christophe itself. The life of M. Rolland seems to have been a per- petual struggle between conflicting mental forces: for years he read philosophy, and suffered agonies before he at last found himself spiritually; until the com- pletion of Jean-Christophe he was a prey to doubts regarding the utility of art and the end of life. He applied in turn to the great master-minds of the world Empedocles, Spinoza, Michelangelo, Shake- speare, Beethoven, Tolstoy seeking for a satisfactory philosophy of life. Small wonder, therefore, that his work should bear the imprint of the masters who have at one time or another been his guides and inspiration. His two years' sojourn in Rome, from 1890 to 1892, 8 4 ROMAIN HOLLAND awakened a passionate interest in the Italian Renais- sance, which he immediately translated into plays. It is likely that Orsino, Les Baglioni, and Le Siege de Mantoue, plays of the Renaissance, were inspired by Shakespeare, for whose historical dramas M. Rolland professes a decided partiality. The plays are not pub- lished, but if we can judge from the fact that Mounet- Sully wished to produce Orsino, they must have shown some of the power of the later plays. At Rome he was associated with the aged revolutionist Malwida von Meysenbug, whom he had met at Versailles some time before, and doubtless the story of her eventful life had its part in shaping his ideals. Four other plays three of them on classical subjects belong to this period: Niobe, Caligula, Empedocle, and Jeanne de Piennes. It is probable that these also belonged to the writer's period of apprenticeship. At the end of M. Rolland's stay in Rome he went to the Wagner" Festival at Bayreuth, in company with Malwida. Even at this time he was already dreaming of a new theater in France, and his theoretical writings of later times bear unmistakable proof of the impression made upon him by the Bayreuth theater and Wagner's epoch-making ideas on art and the people. After his marriage in 1892 Romain Rolland returned to Italy, where he gathered material for his thesis, which he presented and successfully upheld at the Sorbonne in 1895. His subject was The Origins of the Modern Lyric Theater. History of the Opera in Europe Before Lully and Scarlatti,. This he published in book form in 1895. But in addition to his uni- AND THE PEOPLE'S THEATER 5 versity studies and his lectures, he found time to ex- periment with the dramatic form, and in 1896 he pub- lished his Saint Louis. As this was later included in a volume called Tragedies of Faith Les Tragedies de la Foi together with two other plays, he evidently conceived it as one of a series of works based upon a single underlying idea. Saint Louis depicts, in the author's own words, " re- ligious exaltation." In Saint Louis and the two other plays which accompany it Aert and Le Triomphe de la Raison " One can observe the presence of the main currents and passions of the French youth of to-day." All three show " the ardor of sacrifice, but a sacrifice which is courageous, militant : a double reaction against cowardice of thought and cowardice of action, against skepticism and against the relinquishment of the great destiny of the nation." But in spite of this " pro- gram," M. Holland is an artist far too austere to write thesis-plays; he has often spoken in contempt of them. Nor did he in the least appeal to the great public; for his plays have as yet not proved acceptable to them. Saint Louis is a beautiful poem, not a tragedy after all, but a triumph, for no hero may see the fruits of his labor, and if a temporary failure seems for a moment to cloud the sky, it is only temporary. This is the message of Saint Louis. The good monarch who, " dying at the foot of the mountain, sees Jerusalem only through the eyes of his army," is a figure of hope. Aert takes us from the time of the Crusades to " an imaginary Holland of the seventeenth century." Aert, the son of a murdered patriot, is imprisoned by 6 ROMAIN ROLLAND his father's assassin ; he makes a vain effort to rally the forces of the opposition, and at last, free from all that is vile in life, he throws himself from the window. Le Triomphe de la Raison belongs, so far as the subject is concerned, to the Revolutionary plays. As an after- piece to Le 14 Juillet, Danton, and Les Loups, it shows the Revolution " devouring itself " to translate lit- erally the author's own comment. So far as it depicts the excesses into which faith can lead men, it is a tragedy, but there is an implication of progress in the characters whose fate is bound up with that of the Revolution, even those who fell prey to the blood-lust of the Girondist massacres. The Theatre de la Revolution includes the three Revolutionary plays I have just mentioned. They were written not as experiments for some vague stage dreamed by the author, but for theatrical production before the people, the masses of France. That they were not wholly successful matters little ; Romain Rol- land might well refer us to the " moral " of Saint Louis : he has opened a new field and laid before his coun- trymen perhaps the world an ideal which may well require half a century to bear fruit. The idea of writing a series of plays on the French Revolution was suggested to M. Holland by a decree of the Committee of Public Safety, dated March 10, 1794 : 1. That the Theatre-Fransais shall henceforward be solely dedicated to productions given by and for the peo- ple at stated intervals each month: 2. That the building shall bear the following inscription on its facade: PEOPLE'S THEATER, and that the various AND THE PEOPLE'S THEATER 7 troupes of actors already established in the Paris theaters shall be requisitioned in turn to act in these popular pro- ductions, which are to take place three times in every decade. A few weeks later there appeared another decree, inviting the poets " to celebrate the principal events of the French Revolution, to compose Republican plays, and picture for posterity the great epochs of the regeneration of the French, and give to history that solid character which is fitting for the annals of a great people who have fought victoriously for their liberty, in spite of the opposition of all the tyrants of Europe." " All these projects for Republican art," says M. Rolland, " fell, on the 9th of Thermidor, together with the chiefs of the Republic." When, early in 1903, Remain Rolland and a few associates began writing for the Revue d'Art Drama- tique a series of articles on the people's theater, they were merely " following the tradition interrupted by the events of the Revolution; and it was but natural that one of them was led to select the Revolution itself as the natural subject for popular productions. The three plays were to have been part of a dramatic cycle on the Revolution a sort of epic comprising ten plays. Le 14 Juillet was the first page, and Danton, the center, the decisive crisis, wherein the reason of the chiefs of the Revolution seemed to waver, and their common faith be sacrificed to personal hatred. In Les Loups, where the Revolution is depicted on the field of battle, and in Le Triomphe de la Raison, where 8 ROMAIN HOLLAND it goes out into the provinces in pursuit of the Girondin prescripts, it devours itself." Thus M. Holland. The remaining plays are three in number, and in- ferior in dramatic and literary quality to the six just discussed. The first of these is an anti-war propa- ganda piece, Le Temps viendra, published in 1903, and inspired by the Boer war. La Montespan, a French historical drama, followed in 1904, and Les Trois Amoureuses, also based upon history, in 1906. In order to grasp the full significance of M. Hol- land's plays it will be necessary to consider his inter- esting book, Le Theatre du Peuple. Ever since the early eighties M. Holland had been a staunch admirer and in some ways a disciple of Tolstoy. The young Frenchman, however, expressed his doubts to the Rus- sian, and in 1887 Tolstoy wrote a long letter which was, according to one of M. Holland's biographers, a sort of preliminary sketch for What Is Art? And when that astounding book appeared, with its icono- clastic attacks on M. Holland's idols, he was at first prone to disagree, but Le Theatre du Peuple is ample proof that " literature for the people " had sunk deep into the Frenchman's heart. The theater, in common with most modern art, is a whitened sepulcher, rotten to the core, affected, aristocratic, anti-democratic. The evil is not only in the plays, but in acting and the physical arrangement of the playhouse itself. New plays must be written for the masses, plays which they can understand, plays which bring them together as a class and in which they can participate. M. Holland AND THE PEOPLE'S THEATER