IT te is DATE THE BOSTON BROWNING SOCIETY PAPERS THE BOSTON BROWNING SOCIETY PAPERS Selected to represent tjje SHorfc of tije FKOM 1886-1897 gorfc THE MACMILLAN COMPANY LONDON: MACMILLAN & CO., LTD. 1897 All rights reserved Property of tf Pi*blk 1 Jhrarv COPTKIGHT, 1897, By THE MACMELLAN COMPANY. JHntiitrsttg Press: JOHN WILSON AND SON, CAMBRIDGE, U.S.A. PREFATORY NOTE. THE work of the Boston Browning Society, since its organ- ization in 1885, has been varied and continuous, and neither this volume nor the valuable Browning Library of the So- ciety exemplifies all the modes of its activity. This vol- ume, however, although it cannot assume to include all or even the greater part of the essays, studies, and discus- sions contributed to the Sessions of the past twelve years, may stand as generally representative, in so far as writ- ten Papers on special themes are concerned, of the range of the Society's work up to the present time. With that idea in view, as well as with the hope that this book may be of interest and service to other students and readers, it is now offered to the Public. That the literary criticism pursued by the Society has been broad in scope as well as impartial and scholarly in quality, these papers may demonstrate to the most scepti- cal of those who in the past have failed to perceive the significance of the literary movement which the Society represents, and therefore have faile to appreciate the value and permanency of its results. The Boston Society has been particularly fortunate in having among its essayists a number of men and women who have attained eminence as specialists in philosophy, theology, and literature ; and these have contributed to the work of the Society the efii- y VI PREFATORY NOTE. ciency and weight that came from the trained eye and practised hand, as well as of a sound and broad culture. To some degree, the present volume may make this appar- ent in the compass of its subject-matter, covering as it does phases of Browning's art, fame, and philosophy, and in the sympathetic yet judicial nature of the criticism by which it seeks to verify the conclusions and confirm the lead- ings of enlightened taste. Some few of the Papers here published have appeared in The Andovcr Review, The New World, Poet-lore, and The American Journal of Philology, to which magazines the thanks of the Society are due for permission to reprint them. The copious and excellent index to this volume is the work of Miss Elizabeth May Dame. It may be well to call attention to the fact that the ar- rangement of these Papers follows, in the main, the chron- ological order in which they were delivered. PHILIP STAFFORD MOXOM, President. GEORGE DIMMICK LATIMER, Vice- President. JOSHUA KEXDALL, Chairman. EMMA ENDICOTT MAREAN, Librarian. CHARLOTTE PORTER. BOSTON, April 26, 1897. PUBLICATION COMMITTEE, BOSTON BROWNING SOCIETY. CONTENTS. PAGE THE BIOGRAPHY OF BROWNING'S FAME 1 THOMAS WENTWOETH HIGGINSON. BROWNING'S THEISM 7 JOSIAH ROYCE. BROWNING'S ART IN MONOLOGUE 35 PERCY STICKNEY GRANT. ' CALIBAN UPON SETEBOS ' 67 CHARLES GORDON AMES. BROWNING'S THEORY OF ROMANTIC LOVE 84 GEORGE WILLIS COOKE. BROWNING'S PHILOSOPHY OF ART 99 DANIEL DORCHESTER, JR. APPARENT FAILURE, IN REALITY ULTIMATE AND SUBSTAN- TIAL TRIUMPH 118 JOSHUA KENDALL. THE UNCALCULATING SOUL 130 JENKIN LLOYD JONES. THE VALUE OF CONTEMPORARY JUDGMENT . . . . . . 153 HELEN A. CLARKE. BROWNING'S MASTERY OF RHYME 164 WILLIAM J. ROLFE. A BROWNING MONOLOGUE 173 GEORGE DIMMICK LATIMER. DRAMATIC MOTIVE IN ' STRAFFORD ' 190 CHARLOTTE PORTER. BROWNING AS A DRAMATIC POET 203 HENRY JONES. Vlil CONTENTS. PAGE THE PROBLEM OF PARACELSUS 221 JOSIAH ROYCE. 'LuRiA' 249 JOHN WHITE CHADWICK. ' THE RETURN OF THE DRUSES ' 264 GAMALIEL BRADFORD, JK. ' MR. SLUDGE, THE MEDIUM ' 289 FRANCIS B. HOKNBKOOKE. THE OPTIMISM OF BROWNING AND WORDSWORTH ... . 306 A. J. GEORGE. * SORDELLO ' 334 CHARLES CARROLL EVERETT. THE CLASSICAL ELEMENT IN BROWNING'S POETRY .... 363 WILLIAM CRANSTON LAWTON. HOMER AND BROWNING 389 PRENTISS CUMMINGS. BALAUSTION'S OPINION OF EURIPIDES 411 PHILIP STAFFORD MOXOM. THE GREEK SPIRIT IN SHELLEY AND BROWNING 438 VlDA D. SCUDDER. THE NATURE ELEMENT IN BROWNING'S POETRY 471 EMMA ENDICOTT MAREAN. THE BOSTON BROWNING SOCIETY PAPERS. THE BIOGRAPHY OF BROWNING'S FAME. BY THOMAS WENT WORTH HIGGINSON. THE remark was once made to me at a dinner party, by an unusually lively English lady who had just arrived in the United States, to the effect that all the really interest- ing Americans seemed to be dead. While the phrase was certainly marked by the frankness of her nation since it is not easy to imagine a Frenchwoman as saying it, how- ever much she might think it yet it suggested the natu- ral mental attitude of any foreigner visiting any country. Emerson, writing in April, 1843 (Boston Dial, III. 512), says regretfully, "Europe has lost ground lately. Our young men go thither in every ship, but not as in the golden days when the same tour would show the traveller the noble heads of Scott, of Mackintosh, Coleridge, Wordsworth, Cuvier and Humboldt." Yet, for those who went there thirty years later, there were the heads, quite as noble, of Carlyle, Darwin, Tennyson, Browning, Tyndall and Victor Hugo. I was one of these later visitors, and might now easily assume, from the disappearance of those notables, that all the interesting Englishmen are dead also. The London of Andrew Lang and Oscar Wilde would not seem, of itself, a formidable competitor with either of those golden periods. Were I to go once more and meet 1 2 BOSTON BROWNING SOCIETY PAPERS. my vivacious little companion on her native heath, there would certainly be a temptation to be as little restrained by courtesy as she was. The interest of a foreign country lies, for visitors, largely in the fame of its authors. Yet it must be remembered that the biography of an author is not to be reckoned by the parish registers, but by the successive milestones of his fame. We know that Browning's ' Pauline ' was pub- lished in 1833, his 'Paracelsus ' in 1835, his ' Strafford' in 1837, his fii-st instalment of ' Bells and Pomegranates ' in 1841 ; but we know that for long years after this he remained practically unknown to the general public, and that this period lasted even longer in his own country than in America. We also know how complete has been the reversal worked in his case by time. Literary history can, perhaps, produce no lival to the orbit traversed between the publication of ' Pauline,' of which not a single copy was ever sold, and that occasion last year when the Boston Browning Society sent to England an order to bid $ 400 for a copy sold at auction, and failed because the price brought was nearly twice that sum. It is interesting to us, as Americans, to know that the shadow began to lift from Browning's fame a little earlier in this country than in his own. It does not appear from Mr. Sharp's laborious bibliography that any one had re- viewed ' Bells and Pomegranates ' in England when Margaret Fuller printed her brief but warm notice of ' Pippa Passes ' in the (Boston) Dial for April, 1843 (III. 535), although Mr. Sharp does not speak of this, but only of her collected notices of Browning in ' Papers on Literature and Art' (London, 1846). Nor does it appear that any one in England reviewed the collected poems so early as Lowell in the North American Review, in 1848, (LXVI. 357), except a writer in the British Quarterly Review the year previous. But it was true, at any rate, for both countries, that the progress of his fame was more BIOGRAPHY OF BROWNING S FAME. 3 tardy than that of Tennyson. A few facts will make this very clear. Lady Pollock, writing ' Macready as I knew him ' in 1884, describes Macready as first reading Browning to her, thirty years earlier, and as being one of the few who had then (in 1854) learned to admire his poetry. He was dis- turbed to find that Lady Pollock had not read ' Paracelsus ; ' said once or twice " O good God ! " walked up and down the room once or twice and said, " I really am quite at a loss; I cannot understand it." Lady Pollock "pleaded the claims of the babies ; they left little time ; " and he answered, "Hand the babies to the nurse and read ' Paracelsus.' " Then he read it to her, and she was conquered. So slowly did the taste for Browning's poetry grow in the most cultivated circles in London that when, about 1870, Lady Amberley was in this country, and an Amer- ican friend, driving her out from Newport to see Berkeley's house in that vicinity, proposed to call at Mr. Lafarge's house on the way and see the designs from Browning that he had just finished, she expressed utter indiffer- ence, saying that she and her friends in London knew and valued Mr. Browning as a man, but cared absolutely nothing for him as a poet. Lady Amberley was the daughter-in-law of Earl Russell and the daughter of Lord Stanley of Alderley ; she had always been accustomed to meeting authors and artists at her father's house, and her mother was the leading promoter of Girton College. Lady Amberley herself, who was then barely twenty, was in the last degree independent in her opinions, sufficiently so to name an infant daughter after Lucretia Mott ; but all this had not carried her beyond the point where she valued Browning as a man, but utterly ignored him as a poet. It must be remembered, however, that it inevitably takes some time for the leading figures in literature to de- 4 BOSTON BROWNING SOCIETY PAPERS. tach themselves from the mass. A whole school of poets and poetasters was then coming forward at once, and Browning and Tennyson were both seen amid a confused crowd, including Milnes, Trench, Bailey, Alford, Faber, Aubrey de Vere, and the like ; and I can recall many ques- tionings and discussions as to the staying powers of these various competitors. There were always some who were inclined in horse-racing parlance to " back the field," and by no means to accept Tennyson, and still less Browning, as certain to win the prize of fame. Even Margaret Fuller thought ' Paracelsus ' " much inferior to ' Faust ' or ' Festus.' " These periods of temporary equipoise last a good while among the rival candidates for national fame, but they do not endure for ever. Fifty years ago, Italian stu- dents bought a single large volume ' I Quattro Poeti,' which placed the four recognised Italian masters on the same tableland of fame. Now the volume seems to have disap- peared ; Ariosto and Tasso are little more than names to readers; Petrarch has come to be a delicate delight for fastidious scholars ; Italian literature means Dante. In the same way, the interest of German students was for- merly balanced between Goethe and Schiller ; it was hard to tell which had more admirers, though Menzel wrote a History of German Literature to show that Goethe was by far the less important figure. No one would now take this position ; the Goethe literature increases in relative importance day by day, while that in relation to Schiller is comparatively stationary ; indeed, Heine now takes alto- gether the lead of Schiller in respect to criticism and cita- tion. As yet, however, the scales are balancing between the two great contemporary English poets, with distinct indi- cations that Browning is destined to prevail. I remember that Miss Anne Thackeray (afterwards Mrs. Ritchie) in London, in 1872, put the assumed superiority of Tennyson on the strongest ground I had ever heard claimed for it, by pointing out that, other things being BIOGRAPHY OF BROWNING'S FAME. 5 equal, superiority in expression must tell, and that while Tennyson equalled Browning in thought, he clearly sur- passed him in form. It was Tennyson, not he, she said, who had produced gems and masterpieces. She instanced 4 Tears, Idle Tears ' as an example on the smaller scale and ' In Memoriam ' on the larger. It has taken a quarter of a century since then to satisfy me that her first premise equality in thought was mistakenly assumed, so that the whole argument falls. The test of thought is time ; and for myself it is applied in the following way. I began to read the two poets at about the same period, 1841, when I was not quite eighteen, and long before the collected poems of either had been brought together. I then read them both constantly and knew by heart most of those of Tennyson, in particular, before I was twenty years old. To my amazement I now find that I can read these last but little ; the charm of the versification remains, but they seem to yield me nothing new ; whereas the earlier poems of Browning, ' Paracelsus,' ' Sordello,' ' Bells and Pomegranates ' to which last I was among the original subscribers appear just as rich a mine as ever ; I read them over and over, never quite reaching the end of them. In case I were going to prison and could have but one book, I should think it a calamity to have Ten- nyson offered me instead of Browning, simply because Browning has proved himself to possess, for me at least, so much more staying power. This is at least an intelli- gible test, and, to some degree, a reasonable standard; though of course much allowance is to be made for the individual point of view. The opinion of no one per- son is final, however much it may claim to found itself on methods of demonstration or critical principles. If it as- sumes more than a very limited and mainly subjective value, it always drives us back to the saying of Goncourt, " Tout discussion politique revient a ceci : je suis meilleur que vous. Tout discussion litte*raire a ceci : j'ai plus de 6 BOSTON BROWNING SOCIETY PAPERS. goftt que vous." Yet a mere comparison such as. I have made of the judgment of the same mind at two periods of time, involves no such arrogant assumption. Now that both Tennyson and Browning have conclu- sively taken their position as the foremost English poets of their period, it is interesting to remember that their whole external type and bearing represented in some degree the schools to which they respectively belonged. Tennyson, who was English through and through in habit and resi- dence, yet looked like a picturesque Italian priest or gue- rilla leader ; indeed, he christened Mrs. Cameron's best photograph of him " The Dirty Monk," and wrote for her, in my presence, a testimonial that he thought it best. Browning, who had lived so long in Italy that it was made a current ground of objection to his admission to West- minster Abbey, yet looked the Englishman, rather than the poet. He was perhaps best described by Madame Navarro (Mary Anderson) in her Autobiography, who sa}*s that to her surprise he did not look like a bard at all but rather " like one of our agreeable Southern gentlemen " a phrase which, to those who know the type she meant, is strikingly recognisable in the fine photograph of him by Mrs. Myers. He perhaps painted himself, consciously or unconsciously, in the poet of his ' How it Strikes a Con- temporary,' the man who has no airs, no picturesque costume, nothing of the melodramatic, but who notes everything about him, remembers everything, and can, if needed, tell the tale. This is precisely what Walter Savage Landor had foreshadowed, fifty years before, in comparing him to Chaucer. BROWNING'S THEISM. BY JOSIAH KOYCE. [Read before the Boston Browning Society, March 25, 1896.] A POET'S originality may be tested in two ways, first, by observing the novelty of his various individual inventions ; secondly, by considering the peculiar colouring that he has given to well-known and traditional ideas. For the rest, when we consider any man's originality, we commonly find that it shows itself rather more significantly in the manner than in the matter of his discourse, so that it is usually what I have just called the colouring of a man's work, rather than the material novelty of his imaginings, that concerns us when we try to comprehend his personal contribution to the world's treasures. Shake- speare wrought over earlier plays and stories ; Sophocles and -