REESE' LIBRARY OP THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA. Received. Accessions No. Uniform with this Volume. CHRISTIANITY AND HUMANITY. A SERIES OF SERMONS. By THOMAS STARR KING. Edited, with a Memoir, by EDWIN P. WHIPPLE. Fine Steel Portrait. 121110. $2.00. " The volume contains twenty-two discourses, all of which are alive with the vigorous and persuasive eloquence which raised Mr. King to so high a rank among the distinguished preachers of the country. Though liberal in creed, they are singularly evangelical in spirit These extracts give no real conception of the richness of these sermons of Mr. King in thought, knowledge, expression ; far less of the evidences they afford of the elevation and nobility of nature which no fertility of think- ing and no resources of rhetoric can mimic. The man was, in soul and will, what he preached." New York Tribune. "They present every aspect of his many-sided mind and character, and are upon topics which will never lose their freshness or impor- tance as long as man has a religious nature, which lifts him heaven- ward. Read only for their literary beauty and grace of style, and for their keen appreciation of Nature, they will be found very charming and suggestive ; but read for their quickening and stimulating influence upon the religious life, they take on added significance, and are full of power and helpfulness." Boston Journal. HOUGHTON, OSGOOD & CO., Publishers, Boston. SUBSTANCE AND SHOW, AND OTHER LECTURES. BY THOMAS STARR KING. EDITED, WITH AN INTRODUCTION, BY EDWIN P. WHIPPLE. LIBRARY BOSTON : HOUGHTON, OSGOOD AND COMPANY. &be ftttotoe lircss, Cambrfoge. 1879. COPYRIGHT, 1877. BY JAMES R. OSGOOD & CO. UNIVERSITY PRESS : WELCH, BIGELOW, & Co., CAMBRIDGE. K 1*7* CONTENTS. PAGE INTRODUCTION vii I. SUBSTANCE AND SHOW; OR, FACTS AND FORCES i II. THE LAWS OF DISORDER .... 34 III. SOCRATES 78 IV. SIGHT AND INSIGHT 148 V. HlLDEBRAND IQO VI. Music 231 VII. EXISTENCE AND LIFE 254 VIII. THE EARTH AND THE MECHANIC ARTS . 275 *~ IX. DANIEL WEBSTER 299 X. BOOKS AND READING .... 354 ^ XI. THE PRIVILEGE AND DUTIES OF PATRIOTISM 389 INTELLECTUAL DUTIES OF STUDENTS IN THEIR ACADEMIC YEARS .... 413 LIBRARY UNIVKHSITV <>F INTRODUCTION. THOSE who have read the biographical pref- ace to Mr. King's sermons, published about a month ago under the general title of " Christian- ity and Humanity," do not need to be informed that his influence extended far beyond his parish and his denomination, and included that vast mul- titude of listeners who are more or less magneti- cally affected by the lyceum lecturer. Indeed, he was one of the foremost speakers who followed in the train of Ralph Waldo Emerson in erecting the lecture platform into a kind of free pulpit, from which the advanced ideas of spiritual think- ers, philanthropists, and reformers were diffused through the community. It is needless to speak of Emerson's supremacy in this line of thought and endeavor, for it is now universally acknowl- edged. By carefully avoiding all controversy with the good and learned men who were both shocked by his radicalism and charmed by his genius and character, he made his simple affirma- tions felt as forces wherever his voice was heard in our multitudinous lyceums. In the course of a few years he did much to emancipate the popu- lar mind from its ingrained theological and politi- viii Introduction. cal prejudices, and he did this without severely wounding or insulting the feelings and opinions of the champions of the established order. In spite of his occasional indulgence in certain caprices and audacities of his individuality, he commonly confined himself to the glad work of shedding light on the questions he treated ; and the main object of his teaching was directed to disentangling the imperative ideas of truth and goodness, of beauty and justice, from the partial views of all forcible individualities, including his own. He aimed to purify his intellect and moral sentiment from all personal bias, and to make his reason and conscience worthy to receive and an- nounce the inspirations of impersonal truth and morality. His constitution of mind and charac- ter instinctively led him to avoid controversy as something which would inevitably enfeeble his faculty of spiritual insight, and give him a cheap victory over opponents at the immense expense of interrupting his work of patient self-discipline as a seer. Then his friend, Theodore Parker, was always at hand to concentrate on himself every element of pugnacious opposition to the new ideas with a pugnacity that no controversies could ap- pease, and who was incapable of feeling any per- secution so keenly as the persecution of silence, especially when it came from the Unitarian breth- ren whom he criticised. Both of these men la- bored, each after his particular fashion, to make the lecture-room a place where both independence of Introduction. ix opinion and peculiarity of character could be freely expressed ; and a third, Wendell Phillips, needed nothing but his incomparable power of eloquence, which was at once seductive and smiting, to rec- ommend himself to any audience which he con- sented to address, whether he spoke on "The Lost Arts," or on subjects connected with the re- form movements of the time. Mr. King became a force in the lecture-room, as he became a force in the pulpit, by the happy union in his nature of brilliancy of talent with beneficence of character. Few persons will stand the test of that pitiless analysis which austerely probes down through intellect and conscience to the roots of individual disposition, regardless of all the " grafts " which culture or " grace " have added to the original stock ; but those who knew King intimately must admit that, in penetrating to the heart of his being, they found nothing there which contradicted the first impression that he was sound to the core, that he was instinctively sympathetic, unselfish, and humane. This essen- tial goodness made him loved and respected even by those who most violently disagreed with him in opinion ; for there was nothing of the sullen and arrogant self-sufficiency of the dogmatist and ego- tist in his most confident, masculine, and joyous utterance of his own perceptions of truth. Only such persons as were under the slavery of fear, envy, and malignity could suspect that his intellect ever became the organ of such ignoble passions. x Introduction. As a result of this original felicity of nature, his eloquence was as persuasive as it was inspiring and instructive. It had that subtle element of influence which can only come from a humane disposition, underlying thought and style, and vitalizing both. What King said was excellent ; but the spirit in which he said it was felt by per- sons of all grades of culture as a precious some- thing which abolished all distinctions of social " clanship," and, for the time, bound them together in the kinship of a common humanity. In short, his eloquence had that nameless charm which made it universally attractive. It will be observed, by the reader of the present volume, that this per- sonal attractiveness was accompanied by knowl- edge, thought, wit, humor, fancy, and imagination ; that every faculty of the lecturer's mind and every feeling of his heart was engaged in the task of fastening the attention of his hearers to the sub- ject he discussed ; but still, even in the reading, we feel that the great beauty of the performance streaming through all the minor beauties of detail, is the beautiful character of Starr King uncon- sciously impressed upon it. There are many lecturers still living who will remember the effect of the lecture on " Substance and Show " by their experience in following King the week after its delivery. As soon as they arrived, the Lecture Committee inevitably began to talk about King's " Substance and Show" ; as soon as each had concluded his particular address, Introduction. xi the Lecture Committee, after the briefest of all polite pauses, recurred to the more pleasing topic of King and his "Substance and Show." The popularity of this admirable lecture was one of the finest of all tributes ever paid to the average taste and intelligence of the lecture audiences of the country. In a letter to a friend, in December 1851, King says : " My lecture has become a fact and a show ; whether it is a substance and a force is questionable You do not, I think, take the antithesis I make, or exactly appreciate the drift of the plan. The aim of it is wholly prac- tical, to break down, in the popular mind, the inveterate association of strength and permanence with the visible side of the world and things we can * sense.' The illustrations from science are taken to buttress faith in the invisible and intangi- ble as being the causal and productive agencies. Substance is that which stands under, supports, moulds, etc. ; and the whole visible universe really leans upon secret impalpable energies, to which it owes shape, color, and its myriad varieties. I make no antithesis between material and immaterial forces, but show how all the glories and differences in nature are due to the secret working of electric, actinic, magnetic powers, and that the whole order and science of nature is in the last analysis the expression of Divine ideas. With this aid from nature, I go into the historic world and moral life, to show that ideas, sentiments, moral truth, are the most vigorous, despotic, un wasting substances, xii Introduction. since nations lean on them ; and character, the great reality and most efficient force we know, is the organization of these. It is a Lyceum Ser- mon." As to his figurative style, he tells his cor- respondent that rhetoric, considered " as jewelry and rouge, is sufficiently contemptible," but that it is legitimate when it is the expression of what is in itself beautiful. " You are not," he adds, " charitable enough to rhetoric. Equations, plus and minus, algebraic signs and diagrams, are not the ideals of the perfection of speech. God is a glorious rhetorician. How he hides his mathe- matics and bald geometry ! Does n't he orna- ment all the truth he states to us through nature, and when he teaches a chemical and vegetable science in the oak, the elm, and the palm, does n't he perorate in their bossy, waving canopy of leaves?" In the lectures on "The Laws of Disorder," " Sight and Insight," and " Existence and Life," the same general tendency is observable which lends so much attractiveness to " Substance and Show." In reading them we are constantly wit- nessing the transformation of physical into spirit- ual laws, or, as Emerson would say, " the meta- morphosis of natural into spiritual facts." The fertility of the writer's mind in illustrations, analo- gies, and images compels the reader to follow the course of the thinking with a pleased and ever- expectant attention to the end. These lectures, as originally delivered before lyceums, met the Introduction. xiii wants of all the classes huddled together in a lecture audience. The general strain was so high and noble that everybody who listened felt up- lifted and ennobled.- It was not merely, in the case of King's discourse, that " Rustic life and poverty Grew beautiful beneath his touch," but that wealth and poverty were alike made to admit the superiority of mental and moral "good" over mere worldly " goods." The expressions of satisfaction varied with the grammatical rather than the human peculiarities of the persons who were addressed. " What a grand, inspiring, and instructive lecture ! " was the verdict of those clad in silk and broadcloth, after the speaker had con- cluded. " Them 's idees," was the judgment of one hard-headed, horny-handed workman in home- spun, as he came out of the hall by the side of King. The lecture on " Socrates " attained a popularity nearly as great as that on " Substance and Show." This was the more remarkable because the sub- ject might be supposed foreign to the sympathies of those who made up the bulk of the audience of a village or town lyceum. But King, though necessarily not a profound Greek scholar, was passionately attracted to Plato at an early age, and had so absorbed Cousin's French translation of that great master in p ilosophy that he ven- tured, when he had hardly attained legal man- hood, to contribute a critical exposition of Plato's xiv Introduction. doctrine of immortality to the " Universalist Re- view," and in the course of it to question the accuracy and the insight of so accomplished a scholar as Professor Andrews Norton. The figure of Socrates, in the Platonic dialogues, had been impressed so vividly on his imagination, that Socrates at last became to him as actual a per- sonage as any acquaintance he daily passed in the streets of Charlestown or Boston. He thought he could contrive to transfer to other minds the image of this heathen saint and sage as it ex- isted, warm, glowing, and lifelike, in his own. His success was complete. Indeed, the lecture is a masterpiece of its kind. Scholarship can doubtless paint a finer portrait of Socrates ; but to naturalize him, morally and intellectually, so as to make him a sort of fellow-citizen of the honest inhabitants of ordinary American towns and villages, is a task which mere scholarship is incompetent to perform ; yet King succeeded in doing this difficult work. In English literature the most admirable exposition of the life, char- acter, and method of Socrates is doubtless to be found in Grote's " History of Greece" ; but no Cape Cod fisherman or Western pioneer could have been induced to read Grote, whereas both heard King with delight. In the records of our Ameri- can lyceums there is probably no other instance of such a subject being made universally popular by the attractive genius of the speaker. The lecture on " Hildebrand " was written for a Introduction. xv special occasion, and its interest was not tested by being repeated before miscellaneous audi- ences. It is a favorable specimen of King's power of dealing with the great crises and char- acters of ecclesiastical history. The editor had intended to include in this volume a still more elaborate lecture on "Constahtine and his Times"; but the publication of that, as well as of two ad- dresses on the " Life and Writings of St. Paul," is reluctantly postponed for the present. Indeed, an editor who thoroughly explores the mass of manuscripts which Mr. King left behind him, for the purpose of selecting a few for publication, finds his task all the more difficult on account of the very richness of the materials. He knows what he would like to print, but his literary con- science is troubled by the thought of those which he is compelled to omit. Mr. King was intensely sensitive to the in- fluences . of music, though he had no tech- nical knowledge of it as a science, and could not read its language. One of the most eloquent discourses in his volume of sermons is that on "The Organ and its Symbolism"; and readers of the present volume cannot fail to be impressed by the address on " Music," recording, as it does, the ideas and emotions awakened in the writer by listening to the works of the great composers. It was a privilege to sit near him when a work of Handel, Mozart, or Beethoven was performed ; for the ecstasy which thrilled his own frame xvi Introduction. became infectious, and one enjoyed the double delight of hearing the music and of participating in the rapture of a companion whose soul was in most delicious accord with it. Five of the lectures in the present volume were written and delivered in California. That on " Books and Reading " speaks for itself as one of the best of all addresses ever delivered on a topic which has seemingly been worn threadbare by the efforts equally of genius and mediocrity, but which, in King's hands, comes out fresh and new, as though he were the first man who had ever discoursed about it. As far as advice on such a subject is ever an aid to intellectual educa- tion, it may be said that King succeeded in his aim ; for the lecture had not only a surprising pop- ularity, but numbers of his hearers really adopted his plan of reading, and doubtless found it to be of much practical value. The other four lectures refer more or less to the Rebellion. King, while he was in California, could no more keep Jeffer- son Davis and the secessionists out of his ser- mons and addresses, than Dickens's Mr. Dick could keep Charles the First out of his " Memo- rial." The lecture on "Daniel Webster" was one of three which he delivered to immense audi- ences in California before the war broke out. It is now printed, not for its literary merit, but be- cause it contains many felicitous touches of char- acterization, unfolds and forecasts the principles on which the impending struggle must be con- Introduction. xvii ducted, and was a cause of much irritation to those " conservatives " who could not openly op- pose the doctrines of such an apostle of conser- vatism as Webster, but who were still doubtful whether, in the event of a war, they should cast their fortunes with the free or the slave States. The lecture was written in headlong haste, and some of the paragraphs are evidently mere notes of what the lecturer afterwards expanded in the delivery ; but it did its appointed work more effectually than if it had been a perfect specimen of rhetoric ; for it brought into the discussion the authoritative name of Webster, as the one states- man of the country who had not only crushed and trampled under foot all the sophisms of the most redoubtable logicians of disunion and of liberticide, but had made the preservation of the Union the one practical object and supreme ideal of American statesmanship. King's "Webster" was not only denouncedby politicians in news- papers, but gently rebuked by priests in the pulpit. As to the latter, they professed to have no objection to the eulogy of any promi- nent statesman of the past, but they thought it indecorous to apply Webster's principles in a satirical and offensive way to the problems of the present. When the war actually burst out, King plainly told his parishioners that his religion was identical with his patriotism ; and he referred, in a strain of bitter-sweet eloquence, to the theologi- cal rancor which had ostracized him as a dis- xviii Introduction. turber of the public peace, because he had fore- seen and stated those perversions of constitutional law which alone endangered it. Up to the time of Mr. King's death it was gen- erally believed that he, more than any other man, had prevented California and the whole Pacific coast from falling into the gulf of disunion. It is certain that Abraham Lincoln held this opinion ; and it was an opinion which the President shared with thousands of prominent men in all sections of the country, including those California sympa- thizers with the South who were most vexed by King's opposition to their schemes. The usual answer to this general impression of the effect of his work comes, of course, from patriots who maintain that California was sound for the Union from the first ; that King merely felt the pulse of the people, and gave eloquent expression to the general sentiment of the State. But in fact he did not merely feel the people's pulse ; he gave inces- santly an zw-pulse to the vague Union feeling, and directed it to a definite object. Doubtless a large majority of the population were Unionists. Had it been otherwise, it would not have been necessary for some of the most unscrupulous politicians of the State to conceal their treasonable designs un- der patriotic professions of loyalty. Then there was a large body of honest men who insisted that the war should be conducted on principles which would insure the defeat of the Union armies. Miracles are now banished from authentic secular Introduction. xix history ; but still there is something almost mirac- ulous in the triumph of the national cause against the wrong-headiness of those well-meaning patriots who contended that the war should be prosecuted on the constitutional principles which Jefferson Davis and Alexander Stephens laid down for the edification and guidance of Federal statesmen and generals. The leading opponents of the Consti- tution, armed to overturn both /'/ and the gov- ernment founded on it, still managed to steal some time from their conferences with foreign powers, and their direction of military operations, to in- struct the loyal people as to the proper limitations of their power in putting down the most formida- ble of all rebellions ; and there is something comi- cal in the thought that these admonitions not to. violate the provisions of the Constitution were keenly felt, not merely by secret traitors in the loyal States, but by a large body of Unionists who were eager and ready to sacrifice life and property to sustain the Union and the Constitution. " Pleased to the last they cropped the flowery food, And licked the hands just raised to shed their blood." When therefore we say that King kept California strong for the Union, we do not mean that he sim- ply was the eloquent voice through which the gen- eral Union sentiment found expression, but that he guided Union opinion ; that he both anticipated and defended the measures which eventually made the cause of the Union successful. He became a power in California, because he had the sagacity xx Introduction. to detect, and the intrepidity to denounce, the treason that skulked under loyal phrases and catchwords ; and his influence was measured, not by his bursts of declamatory eloquence on the blessings of union, but by the skill with which he took the people, as it were, out of the hands of disloyal politicians, and induced them to give their vigorous support to the administration of the national government. It has not been the intention of the editor of this volume to publish any lecture which specially represents King's deadly animosity to the enemies of the country j indeed, it has now become fashionable to speak of treason as an amiable weakness of generous and susceptible natures; but the reader will note that this animosity bursts forth here and there in the noble lecture on "The Earth and the Mechanic Arts," and even affords the occasion for a sublime image of "the earthquake wave," in the college ad- dress on " The Intellectual Duties of Students." The grand spirit which animates the oration on " The Privilege and Duties of Patriotism " will be felt, appreciated, and acknowledged by hun- dreds who may be irked by the relentless assault made in it on the old aristocracy of Southern slaveholders. But King, during the whole period of his life in California, was so penetrated, through and through, with the sentiment of pa- triotism, that his hostility to the enemies of the Union and the Federal government broke out, Introduction. xxi not merely in such addresses as this to Union soldiers, but in every form in which his moral and intellectual activity found expression. Throughout the lectures in the present volume the reader can hardly fail to be impressed by King's broad humanity. He had a horror of all social arrangements which tended to confirm sterile and stunted natures in the self-satisfaction they derived from contemplating their own little- ness of soul. He ranked men and women, not according to their social position, but according to their place in the ascending scale of intellect and virtue. " Think," he says, in speaking of the future life, " think of the poor exclusives from this sphere carrying their petty measures, which limit their sympathies on earth, into the world of substance, setting up their little coteries to cut Gabriel if he did not belong to their set, or ex- clude some spirit whose brow is freighted with truth, if he was not born quite high enough to suit their fancy ! " The one unmistakable mark of vulgarity was, in his view, narrowness of mind and insensibility of heart, the stupid prejudice which rails at ideas, and the inhuman selfishness which scoffs at philanthropy. In his lectures, as in his sermons, the largeness, liberality, and humanity of his disposition found their natural expression in genial breadth of thought and beneficence of feeling. Everything small and mean was as abhorrent to his soul as xxii Introduction. was everything base and cruel. His heart and brain agreed in instinctively rejecting whatever had a tendency to degrade humanity, and in in- stinctively admitting whatever was calculated to purify, enrich, elevate, and invigorate it. Through- out the present volume, on whatever subject he exercises his bright and joyous faculties, it will ever be found that he is a teacher of manliness as well as of godliness. " Circumstances," he says, " may determine how much show a man shall make. To be famous, depends on some for- tuities ; to be a president, depends on the acute smellers of a few politicians and a mysterious set of wires ; to be rich, depends upon birth or luck ; to be intellectually eminent, may depend on the appointment of Providence ; but to be a man, in the sense of substance, depends solely on one's own noble ambition and determination to live in contact with God's open atmosphere of truth and right, from which all true manliness is inspired and fed." And again he says, in reference to the three methods of observing the material universe which are so prominent in all his lectures : " Out of three roots grows the great tree of nature, truth, beauty, good. The man of science follows up its mighty stem, measures it, and sees its branches in the silver-leaved boughs of the firmament. The poet delights in the symmetry of its strength, the grace of its arches, the flush of its fruit. Only to the man with finer eye than both is the secret of its Introduction. xxiii glory unveiled ; for his vision discerns how it is fed and in what air it thrives. To him it is only an expansion of the burning bush on Horeb, seen by the solemn prophet, glowing continually with the presence of Infinite Law and Love, yet remain- ing forever unconsumed." L i i> it A K Y UNIVKKS1TY OF CAi.IFOL.tNI' X SUBSTANCE AND SHOW; OK, FACTS AND FOECES, I PROPOSE to speak on the difference be- tween substance and show, or the distinction we should make between the facts of the world and life, and the causal forces which lie behind and beneath them. No mind which comprehends the issues involved in the distinction will fail to see that the topic is vitally practical ; for scepticism, or mistaken conceptions of the truth upon this point, must degrade our whole theory of life, demoralize our reverence, and make the region with which our faith should be in constant contact thin, dreamy, and spectral. Most persons, doubtless, if you place before them a paving-stone and a slip of paper with some writing on it, would not hesitate to say that there is as much more substance in the rock than in the paper as there is heaviness. * Yet they might make a great mistake. Suppose that the slip of paper contains the sentence, "God is love" ; or, "Thou shalt love thy neighbor as thyself"; or, " All men have moral rights by reason of heav- enly parentage," then the paper represents more I A 2 Substance and Show ; force and substance than the stone. Heaven and earth may pass away, but such words can never die out or become less real. The word "substance" means that which stands under and supports anything else. Whatever then creates, upholds, classifies anything which our senses behold, though we cannot handle, see, taste, or smell it, is more substantial than the object itself. In this way the soul, which vivifies, moves, -and supports the body, is a more potent substance than the hard bones and heavy flesh which it vitalizes. A ten-pound weight falling on your head affects you unpleasantly as substance, much more so than a leaf of the New Testament, if dropped in the same direction ; but there is a way in which a page of the New Testament may fall upon a nation and split it, or infuse itself into its bulk and give it strength and permanence. We should be careful, therefore, what test we adopt in order to decide the relative stability of things. There is a very general tendency to deny that ideal forces have any practical power. But there have been several thinkers whose scepticism has an opposite direction. " We cannot," they say, " attribute external reality to the sensations we feel." We need not wonder that this theory has failed to convince the unmetaphysical common- sense of people that a stone post is merely a stub- born thought, and that the bite of a dog is noth- ing but an acquaintance with a pugnacious, four- or. Facts and Forces. 3 footed conception. When a man falls down stairs it is not easy to convince him that his thought simply tumbles along an inclined series of percep- tions and comes to a conclusion that breaks his head ; least of all, can you induce a man to be- lieve that the scolding of his wife is nothing but the buzzing of his own waspish thoughts, and her use of his purse only the loss of some golden fan- cies from his memory. We are all safe against such idealism as Bishop Berkeley reasoned out so logically. Byron's refutation of it is neat and witty : " When Bishop Berkeley says there is no matter, It is no matter what Bishop Berkeley says." And yet, by more satisfactory evidence than that which the idealists propose, we are warned against confounding the conception of substance with matter, and confining it to things we can see and grasp. Science steps in and shows us that the physical system of things leans on spirit. We talk of the world of matter, but there is no such world. Everything about us is a mixture or mar- riage of matter and spirit. A world of matter simply would be a huge heap of sandy atoms or an infinite continent of stagnant vapor. There would be no motion, no force, no form, no order, no beauty, in the universe as it now is ; organization meets us at every step and wherever we look ; organization implies spirit, something that rules, disposes, penetrates, and vivifies matter. See what a sermon Astronomy preaches as to 4 Substance and Show ; the substantial power of invisible things. If the visible universe is so stupendous, what shall we think of the unseen force and vitality in whose arms all its splendors rest? It is no gigantic Atlas, as the Greeks fancied, that upholds the celestial sphere ; all the constellations are kept from fall- ing by an impalpable energy that uses no muscles and no masonry. The ancient mathematician, Archimedes, once said, "Give me a foot of ground outside the globe to stand upon, and I will make a lever that will lift the world." The invisible lever of gravitation, however, without any fulcrum or purchase, does lift the globe, and make it waltz too, with its blond lunar partner, twelve hundred miles a minute to the music of the sun, ay, and heaves sun and systems and milky- way in majestic cotillons on its ethereal floor. You grasp an iron ball, and call it hard ; it is not the iron that is hard, but cohesive force that packs the particles of metal into intense socia- bility. Let the force abate, and the same metal becomes like mush ; let it disappear, and the ball is a heap of powder which your breath scatters in the air. If the cohesive energy in nature should get tired and unclench its grasp of matter, our earth to use an expressive New-England phrase would instantly become " a great slump " ; so that what we tread on is not material substance, but matter braced up by a spiritual substance, for which it serves as the form and show. All the peculiarities of rock and glass, diamond, or y Facts and Forces. 5 ice, and crystal are due to the working of unseen military forces that employ themselves under ground, in caverns, beneath rivers, in mountain crypts, and through the coldest nights, drilling companies of atoms into crystalline battalions and squares, and every caprice of a fantastic order. When we turn to the vegetable kingdom, is not the revelation still more wonderful? The forms which we see grow out of substances and are sup- ported by forces which we do not see. The stuff out of which all vegetable appearances are made is reducible to oxygen, hydrogen, carbon, and ni- trogen. How does it happen that this common stock is worked up in such different ways ? Why is a lily woven out of it in one place and a dahlia in another, a grape-vine here, and a honeysuckle there, the orange in Italy, the palm in Egypt, the olive in Greece, and the pine in Maine ? Simply because a subtile force of a peculiar kind is at work wherever any vegetable structure adorns the ground, and takes to itself its favorite robe. We have outgrown the charming fancy of the Greeks that every tree has its Dryad that lives in it, animates it, and dies when the tree withers. But we ought, for the truth's sake, to believe that a life-spirit inhabits every flower and shrub, and protects it against the prowling forces of destruc- tion. Look at a full-sized oak, the rooted Levia- than of the fields. Judging by your senses and by the scales, you would say that the substance of the noble tree was its bulk of bark and bough and 6 Substance and Show; branch and leaves and sap, the cords of woody and moist matter that compose it and make it heavy. But really its substance is that which makes it an oak, that which weaves its bark and glues it to the stem, and wraps its rings of fresh wood around the trunk every year, and pushes out its boughs and clothes its twigs with digestive leaves and sucks up nutriment from the soil con- tinually, and makes the roots clench the ground with their fibrous fingers as a purchase against the storm wind, and at last holds aloft its tons of matter against the constant tug and wrath of gravitation, and swings its Briarean arms in triumph over the globe and in defiance of the gale. Were it not for this energetic essence that crouches in the acorn and stretches its limbs every year, there would be no oak ; the matter that clothes it would enjoy its stupid slumber; and when the forest monarch stands up in his sinewy lordliest pride, let the pervading life power, and its vassal forces that weigh nothing at all, be annihilated, and the whole structure would wither in a second to inorganic dust. So every gigantic fact in nature is the index and vesture of a gigantic force. Everything which we call organization that spots the landscape of nature is a revelation of secret force that has been wedded to matter, and if the spiritual powers that have thus domesticated themselves around us should be cancelled, the whole planet would be a huge desert of Sahara, a black sand-ball without a shrub, a grass-blade, or a moss. or, Facts and Forces. 7 As we rise in the scale of forces towards greater subtility the forces become more important and efficient. Water is more intimately concerned with life than rock, air higher in the rank of ser- vice than water, electric and magnetic agencies more powerful than air, and light, the most deli- cate, is the supreme magician of all. Just think how much expenditure of mechanical strength, is necessary to water a city in the hot summer months. What pumping and tugging and wearisome trudg- ing of horses with the great sprinklers over the tedious pavement ! But see with what beautiful and noiseless force nature waters the cities! The sun looks steadily on the ocean, and its beams lift lakes of water into the air, tossing it up thousands of feet with their delicate fingers, and carefully picking every grain of salt from it before they let it go. No granite reservoirs are needed to hold in the Cochituates and Crotons of the atmosphere, but the soft outlines of the clouds hem in the vast weight of the upper tides that are to cool the globe, and the winds harness themselves as steeds to these silken caldrons and hurry them along through space, while they disburse their rivers of moisture from their great height so lightly that seldom a violet is crushed by the rudeness with which the stream descends. Our conceptions of strength and endurance are so associated with visible implements and mechan- ical arrangements that it is hard to divorce them, and yet the stream of electric fire that splits an ash 8 Substance and Show ; is not a ponderable thing, and the way in which the loadstone reaches the ten-pound weight and makes it jump is not perceptible. You would think the man had pretty good molars that should gnaw a spike like a stick of candy, but a bottle of innocent-looking hydrogen gas will chew up a piece of bar-iron as though it were some favorite Cav- endish ; and Mr. Faraday, the great chemist, claims to have demonstrated that each drop of water is the sheath of electric force sufficient to charge eight hundred thousand Leyden jars. In spite of Maine liquor laws, therefore, the most temperate man is a pretty hard drinker, for he is compelled to slake his thirst with a condensed thunder-storm. The difference in power between a woman's scolding and a woman's tears is explained now. Chemistry has put it into formulas. When a lady scolds a man has to face only a few puffs of articulate car- bonic acid, but her weeping is liquid lightning. The prominent lesson of science to men, there- fore, is faith in the intangible and invisible. Shall we talk of matter as the great reality of the world, the prominent substance? It is nothing but the battle-ground of terrific forces. Every particle of matter, the chemists tell us, is strained up to its last degree of endurance. The glistening bead of dew from which the daisy gently nurses its strength, and which a sunbeam may dissipate, is the globular compromise of antagonistic powers that would shake this building in their unchained rage. And so every atom of matter is the slave or, Facts and Forces. 9 of imperious masters that never let it alone. It is nursed and caressed, next bandied about, and soon cuffed and kicked by its invisible overseers. Poor atoms ! no abolition societies will ever free them from their bondage, no colonization move- ment waft them to any physical Liberia. For every particle of matter is bound by eternal fealty to some spiritual lords, to be pinched by one and squeezed by another and torn asunder by a third ; now to be painted by this and now blistered by that; now tormented with heat and soon chilled with cold ; hurried from the Arctic Circle to sweat at the Equator, and then sent on an errand to the Southern Pole; forced through transmigrations of fish, fowl, and flesh; and, if in some corner of crea- tion the poor thing finds leisure to die, searched out and whipped to life again and kept in its con- stant round. Thus the stuff that we weigh, handle, and tread upon is only the show of invisible substances, the facts over which subtle and mighty forces rule. Next, let us look at ideas as substantial things. If the true definition of substance is causal and sustaining force, then ideas take the first rank as substances, for the whole universe was thought into order and beauty. The word was, " Let there be light, and there was light." Nature is the language and imagery of Divine ideas. A Persian poet said : " The world is a bud from the bower of his beauty ; the sun is a spark from the light of his wisdom ; the sky is a bubble on the io Substance and Show ; sea of his power," A row of types, as arranged by a compositor, not only present to the eye cer- tain shapes, colors, and other sensible qualities, but also intimate to the mind some thought that once arose in a human intellect, and which they have been selected to represent to others. So all the objects of nature constitute a hieroglyphic alphabet, which states great truths and senti- ments that dwell in the Infinite intellect ; with this difference, that the objects of nature are cre- ated and upheld by the idea or sentiment which possesses them. They would fall away and dis- solve if the eternal truth they represent should vanish, just as the body would crumble if the soul should leave it. Not a planet that wheels its circle around its controlling flame, not a sun that pours its blaze upon the black ether, not one of all the con- stellated chandeliers that burn in the dome of heaven, not a firmament that spots the robe of space with a fringe of light, but is a visible statement of a conception, wish, or purpose in the mind of God, from which it was born, and to which alone it owes its continuance and form. Jonathan Edwards imagined that the Almighty creates and upholds the universe, as a reflection on a mirror is caused and sustained by the person or object that stands before it. The rays fall from the object upon the mirror every moment, and the reflection would cease as soon as the object should remove ; so, he conceived, the uni- verse is the continuous image of the Creator's or, Facts and Forces. 1 1 constant thought, and would change instantly if the expression of his purpose varied, and would fade from space if his ideas should be dismissed. The mind cannot entertain a more sublime thought than this, and we learn from it that the man who does not delight in the beauty of the universe, and does not receive into his soul some impressions of the meaning of nature, has no contact with the world of Divine Substance, but lives in a vast baby-house of Show. Let us see, next, how applicable the principle we are considering is to the world of man and history. All the shows of social life are mani- festations of a secret and impalpable substance. Every house, workshop, church, school-room, athenaeum, theatre, is the representative of an opinion. What the eye sees of them is built of bricks, iron, wood, and mortar by carpenters, smiths, and masons ; but the seed from which they grew and the forces by which they are up- held are ideas, affections, conceptions of utility, sentiments of worship. Strike these out of a people's mind and heart, and its homes, temples, colleges, and art-rooms fall away, like the trunk of the oak when its life-power is smitten, and only the bald, sandy surface of savage life remains. What a difference it would make in the physical and moral landscape of a new country, whether a race of Saxons or of Turks were dropped upon it ! In the latter case the timber and stone are slowly conjured into the form of mosques and minarets, 12 Substance and Show ; Sultan's palaces and harems, and the various fea- tures of a lazy Moslem civilization ; while the coming of the Saxon genius bids the forests pre- pare to be^hewn for homes and factories, humble shrines of learning, and thickly strewn domes for Sabbath praise and prayer. The iron can no longer sleep in its hiding-places ; the coal the only black slave whose labor the white man may rightfully impress must bring its hot tempera- ment to human service ; the streams are com- pelled to pour their strength upon muscular and busy wheels, that weave fabrics of comfort and luxury ; valleys are exalted, and mountains bend their necks ; steam hurries with monstrous bur- dens ; magnetism shoots thoughts along its slen- der veins ; mighty piles that stand for justice, law, and equal government overlook a thousand cities ; and the white wings of commerce, vying in num- ber and in speed with the pinions of the sea-birds, flap in every breeze that stirs the polar, the mod- erate, or the tropic waves. There may be as many men, as much bodily strength, among the Turks as with the Saxons ; but there is not the spirit, there are not the ideas, to make the fingers so cunning and the muscles so strong. It is the hidden spiritual substance in the Saxon frames that makes their bones and blood its purchase and pulleys, to lift up the myriad structures that bear witness to Saxon civilization. All that we see in England and America, so different from what Cal- cutta and Canton exhibit to the eye, is the cloth- or, Facts and Forces. 13 ing and show of different ideas, principles, and sentiments that pervade our vigorous blood. Thus, each nation of the globe is a huge bat- tery of spiritual forces to which each individual contributes something. The oneness of the na- tion is the unity of the galvanic current that is generated from the many layers of metal and acid. And the question of the superior power of one nation over another is not at all to be decided by the relative numbers of population and armies, nor by the forts, guns, and magazines, but rather by the relative mental and moral energies of the lands. France, for instance, is a magnificent in- carnation of a certain temperament, and the gen- erations that rise up in her borders continually supply the same mental and social forces, thus giving her one character through centuries. Eng- land, moreover, is the hive of very different pas- sions and powers, and the point whether, in a long war, giving each side money enough, Eng- land or France would triumph, is reduced to the question whether the effervescent impulses and military enthusiasm of the Celtic blood are supe- rior, as spiritual qualities, to the more slow and sullen force, the cautious but persistent resolution, and the tough obstinacy of resistance that make up the power of an Anglo-Saxon army. In the great campaigns of Wellington in Spain, and in the conduct of -the struggle at Waterloo, this was the real strife, a wrestle of certain spiritual qualities with each other. The charge of the 14 Substance and Show ; French under Ney or Mural, and beneath the eye of Napoleon, was the gathering roll and swing of the storm-waves ; whatever was movable must fall before it ; but the mind and the resources of Wellington and the temper of the men who served him were the Saxon rock on which those magnifi- cent Celtic surges swung their white wrath in vain. Every charge of Ney's cavalry against Wellington's central position at Waterloo was the beat of a fiery sensibility against a stony patience. The whole scene was less a contest of military science than a visible conflict of different passions and a thor- ough testing of their strength. It was the old hypothesis, in dramatic play, of an irresistible in contact with an immovable. The irresistible was spent ; the immovable stood fast. All fighting illustrates the same law. In the old Greek days Darius could oppose a hundred spears to each one of Alexander's, and we won- der that the Persians were so easily beaten. The reason is that the fighting in the young Greek general's army was done by spears plus brains, courage, enthusiasm. Discipline in a battalion is of more consequence than numbers, because it adds a spiritual force to that of muscles ; fervor is often found superior to the most thorough dis- cipline, for fervor is a higher spiritual force and outweighs the weaker. Bayonets are never so sharp and terrible in the hands of an advancing line, as when they are bayonets that think, as was the case in our own Revolution; and there are or. ; Facts and Forces. 1 5 no regiments so mighty and dangerous as those which Cromwell headed, where the highest spirit- ual qualities were drilled into the ranks, and the bayonets could not only think, but pray. Thus, in all cases, a nation or an army, so far as its persons all that we can see of it are concerned, is only a show ; the substance of it is the ideas, passions, genius, enthusiasm, that per- vade it, and are not seen. Our doctrine is illustrated, also, by the fact that the power of a nation is made up, in part, by the generations of past years, whose bodily forms long ago mouldered to dust. There is no more beautiful or impressive law of history than that by which the past genius, heroism, and patriotic clevotedness are woven into the structure of a people, giving it character. The acts and spirit of a person's former years are not lost, but are represented in the face, the habits, the weakness, or the power of the person's mind and heart to- day. In the same way a state has a personality that endures through centuries ; all its great men and bad men, its good laws and vile laws, its faithfulness and its crimes, contribute to its char- acter ; nothing dies ; but what was fact and show in a living generation becomes force and sub- stance when the actors have departed. Look at England, for instance. Is that which we call England composed simply of twenty millions of men and women that inhabit that island now? How truly do the statesmen, patriots, orators, 1 6 Substance and Show ; poets, kings, cabinets, and parties of several hun- dred years, belong to our conception of what England is ! The witness of their activity is not only prominent in the literature and art, the cas- tles and cathedrals, the palaces and towers, the liberties and laws, that are visible on the English land and in their society, but an incalculable force has been shed from this background of greatness and genius into the generation of to- day, and through the present will be transmitted into the future. Let a hostile cabinet declare war against England, and try to tread out her spirit and influence, and they would find that a force is needed competent to crush twenty generations. For, though the merchants, traders, and laborers little think of it in time of peace, and perhaps care not half a fig for the men that walked through the streets they tread, two centuries ago, Sidney, Russell, Pym, and Hampden, Newton, and Shake- speare, and Chatham, the great dead of West- minster Abbey, and the honored names of Oxford and Cambridge, still stand in the background, and in an emergency would start forward and give the immense momentum of their spirit to an onset against an invading foe. As the ghost of the hero Theseus appeared, according to the Athenians, on the field of Marathon, and inspir- ited their ranks against the Persians, the great- ness which a nation has enshrined in its tradi- tions is part of its deepest present life ; and it often happens that the shades of the fathers are or, Facts and Forces. 17 a more substantial rampart for a land than the swords of the children. See, too, how our revolutionary experience, genius, and fidelity are involved in the character of America. They are not dead facts written in mute annals; they are vital memories of the nation, as though the same men that are now on the stage had once performed them. We take the credit of that wisdom, persistence, and sacri- fice partly to ourselves ; we are proud of them ; and in any crisis our arms would be the stronger, our wit the quicker, our fortitude the more heroic, because of the impulses that would thrill bur veins from the beatings of that revolutionary heart. Strike out the idea of America and the hope of America from our people, and a great portion of the force and enthusiasm of our people would be annihilated. That period of our na- tional fortunes is far more than a show in our his- tory ; it is part of our present substance. It was not a fact of the past merely ; it is a force of our national character. The most mournful sight in the case of any nation is the evident destitution of any great po- litical sentiments and principles that have grown for centuries, and are rooted in its heads, habits, and hearts. What a sad thing that, on the intel- lectual and moral soil of France, beautiful, enthu- siastic France, whose genius has been refining for ages like the wine its own vineyards distil, no ideas of rights and constitutional freedom have 1 8 Substance and Show ; grown, that could not be pulled up in a night by a dissolute ruffian, wearing and polluting a splendid name ! Think you that in England or here any cowardly conspirator could weave the noose that in one night should drag down the form and the sentiment of Liberty from its sacred niche in the popular affections, and the next day make the people themselves applaud that it was done so well ? A Bedouin robber might as well try to lasso and uproot a hickory-tree that had toughened its roots in the ground for a century. Poor France was overgrown with the merest weedy sentiments of liberty ; for it is only weeds that bayonets can scratch up. If we reflect on the sources of national power and prosperity, we shall soon see how its strength rests on an invisible and ideal base, and is devel- oped out of mental and moral resources. Little Greece resisted the flood of Persian arms, and at last conquered the East, because there was more vitality more courage, genius, enthusiasm in her people than in the swarming myriads which the bulk of the Persian Empire enclosed. Rome, too, rose to supreme sway by the despotic influence of character, not of legions. When Rome fell she had more troops and fortifications than in the height of her republican supremacy, but she had lost her real and invisible strength, that of tem- perance, hardihood, valor, moral soundness; in- ternal dissension, luxury, and bad government had unnerved her hands; and therefore her visible or, Facts and Forces. 19 defences of battalions and armaments were noth- ing but empty shell and show. The British domin- ion is supported now by the strong fibres of Saxon wisdom and pride that run through the whole extent of it. It is those that knit Calcutta and Australia, Gibraltar and Cape Town, to London and Liverpool and the Parliament House. The most effectual way to paralyze the pros- perity of our country at this moment would be to smite an ideal element that interpenetrates the land. The soil over half our area might be blighted, pestilence might decimate our laborers, tornadoes might scatter a great portion of our tonnage in ruins upon the sea, droughts might shrivel the rivers into thin and feeble rills; but all this would be less disastrous than to annihilate the system of credit that pervades the mercantile world. Destroy that impalpable thing, break down the confidence between city and country, the re- liance which State feels upon State and East upon West, the trust which man reposes in his neighbor, and it is the same as if you arrest the pitch of waterfalls, and smother the breezes that ruffle the deep, and wilt the fierce energy of steam, and un- string the laborer's arm, and quench the furnace- fires, and stop the hum of wheels, and forbid emi- grants to seek the West and cities to rise amid the silence of its woods. Our prosperity and our hopes lean back on that moral bond more than they do on nature or on capital ; shake it, and there is an earthquake of society ; restore it, and order, activ- ity, happiness, and wealth return. 2O Substance and Show ; As a bond of union for our States, moreover, there is one element more substantial than even the wisdom of our Constitution, the interlocked geographical unity of our territory, and the power of our central government. It is our common memories of a great history, and the one language that is spoken in all our zones and over all the breadth of the lines of longitude, that mark the leagues from the Atlantic to the Pacific shores. It is hardly possible that any wisdom of political structure or administration could hold so many States together against such diversities of social customs, intelligence, and interest, if the different districts of our empire spoke different languages. But our unity of speech, the common way in which we articulate our breath and write our thoughts, enabling the farthest backwoodsman to feel kindred with the culture of the East, making all commercial correspondence simple and easy, allowing us to read the same books, to read the same speeches with common delight in a common eloquence, this is like a soul breathed through all the limbs of our confederacy, giving it a stronger unity than its geological skeleton or its political muscles can. Destroy this community of language, give a distinct tongue to each great division of our land, introduce confusion of dia- lects into our capital, and we could have no more permanent unity than the mechanical one which Nebuchadnezzar's image had, with its head of gold, its breast of silver, its thighs of brass, its or, Facts and Forces. 21 legs of iron, and its feet of clay. Its parts might be dislodged from each other. There would not be invisible unity to mould into vital permanence its unity of show. The politicians every now and then get up their schemes of division, but the common mother .tongue drowns them before they swim far. As long as the free soil and the Hunker speeches in Congress are made in the same dialect the danger of their antagonism is greatly abated. Only the old mother tongue does try to tell us, through the dictionaries, that the word "slave" is not Saxon. It came into our speech by foreign immigration ; it cannot show any naturalization papers, the Con- stitution rejected it, and so certainly, according to the present tendencies of party, it ought not to be allowed to gain power and office over the good native American noun "freedom." I have several times used the word "civilization" in connection with the subject we are considering. Let us see now what light the meaning of that word sheds upon our theme. There are a vast number of things that make up civilization. They are invisible, but they are among the most sub- stantial and potent realities connected with our globe. Besides the men and women, the houses and wealth, that exist in Christendom, there is such a thing as civilization, which has been growing steadily, and which lives on while the generations die. There is government in the civilized world, 22 Substance and Show ; there are reverences, laws, manners and habits, tastes and principles, and all these make up the structure of society. Just as the surface of the globe is composed of various layers of clay, sand- stone, slate, and granite, which successive geologi- cal epochs deposited, and the united strength of which uphold our soil and support our steps, the moral world is constructed of strata of laws, cus- toms, opinions, truths, discoveries, sentiments, which successive races and generations have de- posited, and which our souls live upon now. The best life of the nations that are gone is still in our civilization. Influences from the Old Testament, from Grecian literature and character, from Roman heroism and law, are steadily poured into our moral life from countless churches and colleges, although the Hebrew State, the Greek Republics, and the Roman Empire have been buried for cen- turies. And so from the German barbarians of the Northern forests, from the feudal customs, from the Crusades, from the Catholic church in its ripe power and glory, from the life of Socrates and the intellect of Augustine, from the speech of Paul on Mars Hill and the thinking of John Huss, from what Bacon wrote and Shakespeare imagined and Faust invented and Newton discov- ered and Fulton devised ; in short, from all the victories of heroes and the blood-sealed fidelity of martyrs and the holy achievements of saints some contributions have been made to that pro- gressive reality we call civilization, and they all or, Facts and Forces. 23 exist around us now as beneficent forces that en- noble our lives with privileges and a value which cannot be estimated. Your father may not have left you any legacy of houses and stock, but the whole past is your mental and moral father, and that leaves to every one of us an inheritance which it would be a miserable bargain for us to sell for a fortune of millions on condition of being disentangled from the civilized life of the race. The poorest man in this neighborhood is im- mensely rich, so far as attaining the great objects of life is concerned, especially if he has a family, compared with what his poverty would be if he could own a hundred square miles of original na- ture, and must live on it alone with his family, cut off from all privileges of society and with the wealth of civilized influence forever cancelled from his brain and breast. Thus we see that the substance of the past lives on nnd is vitally present with us now. All that is visible of a nation dies, but its soul survives ; the truth it discovered and illustrated is preserved ; its essence passes into civilization, improves so- ciety, and becomes the common property of after times. In the old furniture-shops of Boston you can buy chairs and tables that came out of the May- flower to an extent that would load a fleet. How- ever much humbug there may be about this, thank Heaven the spiritual cargo that was packed into that little hull is not all unloaded yet. New Eng- 24 Substance and Show ; land liberty and thrift have been disembarked from it ; half of New York and Ohio and Illinois and Wisconsin have been heaved out of its hold by invisible stevedores ; and there is enough left yet to set up good Constitutions in the farther slopes of the Rocky Mountains and make Kansas free. Think for a moment, too, of the order in a great city, and how it is preserved. What pas- sions are boiling in London and Boston and the streets of New York ! And how is it that we are kept from conspiracies and mobs and devastations of license ? How is it that the spirit of our social life is higher in respect of peace than the aggre- gate of individual lives, which is the splendid mystery of civilization ? It is not by direct and visible pressure of resisting force, but by the fine network of interests, opinions, reverences, feelings of honor and shame, fears and loves, disposed over the community, which hold the brutal ele- ments of our nature in check, as Gulliver was made prisoner by the threads which the cunning Lilliputians wove over his bod) 7 , and. one of which they fastened to each of his hairs. Does any man say that the laws, the courts and sheriffs, uphold our order? Plainly the sanc- tity of the laws does not consist in their enact- ments by legislatures, or their preservation in sheep-skin binding (a style of binding, by the way, which many of our laws had when they were yet in the brains of their authors). Sentiments or. Facts and Forces. 25 and principles in the people, faith and loyalty, varnish the laws with their real majesty. Once in a while a great officer of the law comes along, like the venerable Hays, so famous in Bos- ton, who stands forth as a physical Napoleon of police. It is not by his personal finite genius that he wears such terror. But he is a good con- ductor of the respect for law which is latent in the community. His frame is electric with the potency of civil authority everywhere. We had a marshal in Boston lately that sometimes ap- peared on a Saturday night in a circle of gamblers, and though he was but one man among a score or two, he changed the game very quick, and he in- fused a sudden passion for a different shuffle and cut than any laid down in Hoyle. The play shifted by magic from whist and loo to leap-frog and all- fours, because a worthy embodiment of social law, invested with the moral force of civilization, ap- palled and scattered them. When the lightning strikes a tree there is a stream of electricity from the ground that conspires with the flame from heaven to complete the bolt, else it is harmless ; and so the law in the guilty men leaps out and combines with the electric flash from every great officer's form, to do the work of moral paralysis. There was great wisdom sententiously expressed in the exclamation of a little constable I heard of once who went to arrest a burly offender against the statutes, and was threatened with a shaking if he did not " clear out." If it had been a matter of 26 Substance and Show; fists and muscles, the majesty of the law would have been miserably bruised. But the intrepid little officer responded : " Do it if you please only remember, if you shake me you shake the whole State of Massachusetts." The substance of power is that which sways the minds and hearts of the people ; all else is the show of it. And so the highest badge of civic authority now is not the sceptre of a king, not the dress of a president, not the uniform of a general, but the pole of a constable. The English or Yankee policeman wears a badge which so- ciety spontaneously respects, which innocence and weakness instinctively rejoice in, which guilt and knavery instinctively fear. What is the authority of Nicholas the Czar, or Louis Napoleon in his rocking-chair of bayonets ? (may every point of them prick the tanned hide of his conscience yet !) what are they but imperial bullies with military bull-dogs to keep the wrath of the human race at bay ? Mr. Bumble the beadle sits on the throne of civil power ; to him the human race goes down with honest awe upon its knees. Surely this nation could better afford to part with its 'armies and navy, its forts, guns, maga- zines, and military science, than to have an abate- ment of one per cent from the regard which the people have for the forms of a town-meeting, their deep reverence for the statutes, their quick submission to a writ, their dread of mobs, their love of home, and the awe that attends the hear- or, Facts and Forces. 27 ing a sentence of death from a judge. In the first case the country would lose some visible facts which represent its strength, and which might be replenished by taxation ; in the latter case it would part with forces, inherited from past ages, which are its strength, and by which it is swung over the abyss of lawlessness, as the globe is hurried over the black depths of space by the threads of gravi- tation that are more subtle than sunbeams. Finally, character is one of the prominent sub- stances of the world, that is, it is one of the things which do the most as causes to uphold society and quicken it. Character, in the sense of great personal energy, changes the face of nature, digs mines, builds railroads, levels mountains, founds cities, evokes factories, dwarfs the oceans to con- venient ponds. And in higher senses, we cannot tell what impress one original soul like David's, so splendid in genius, so sensitive to every breath of circumstance, so sincere in his piety, his sin, and his terrible remorse, leaves on the fortunes of after generations. His great heart has been an electric battery to the bosoms of countless millions of whom he never dreamed. Who of us is acute enough to untwist the whole of our debt to the burly substance of Martin Luther's spirit ? Strike him out of the last three centuries, and you tear out the very spine of our liberties and mechanical arts ; our railroads and steamships, and most of the material forces of Protestant civilization are rent away with him, for they radiate from his 28 Substance and Show ; rough generic thought. The Duke of Wellington assented to the estimate which somebody made, that the presence of Napoleon on the field was equal to forty thousand men. See, too, what the character of the Puritans is doing for New England at this moment. It gives it a firmer basis than its granite strata. It is the stamina of the present virtue of those States. It has built and reared their colleges and schools. It is the vigor of their intelligence and the sinew of their piety, and thus is a substantial benefit after the bodily forms that once housed it are crumbled. And advert, for a moment, to what the character of. Washington has done, and will yet do, for Amer- ica and freedom. Better for our country in the crisis of its history to have lost its collected treas- ures, to have parted with half its territory and half its citizens, than to have been robbed of the heart of Washington. His soldiers derived cour- age, faith, and food from his serene and hopeful majesty, and during that terrible winter at Valley Forge the nourishment of future ages was in the continuance of the resources in that one breast. His character is part of this Western World for- ever, as much part of it as our forests and our rocks. So there is an ascending series of creative and substantial forces, beginning with mechanical energies and running up through chemical affin- ities, vital powers, perception, will, ideas, to per- sonality. We often use the expression with regard to a person in society, that " he is a man of sub- or, Facts and Forces. 29 stance." Generally this phrase conveys the idea that a man has acquired some property. It would be very applicable if it stood for the " real estate " which a man has amassed, that is, for his per- sonal estate of great qualities, forces of genius, learning, truth, moral power, and influence. For it happens that, in the supreme realm of which we are citizens, and where the eternal laws tax and weigh us, our personal estate, that is, what we are, is our real estate. How absurd to use the word "substance" of a man, and make it signify a house, bank-stock, a heap of guineas, a store full of mer- .chandise ; things that do not touch his humanity at all. He is the man of substance that has the noble qualities which belong to human nature packed into him, and that can stand up, strong and solid, if all the accidents, such as fame, posi- tion, money, worldly consideration, are stripped away. It would be just as sensible to take a man in the last stages of consumption, a weak and wasted frame of bones, and after getting a tailor to dress him up and pad him out large with batting, to call him a man of physical substance, as to use that phrase of persons that only have a market control over some dollars, and are destitute of the forces and resources that belong to a mind, heart, and soul. Your Herschel and Newton are men of intellectual substance, Fenelon and Wesley of spiritual substance, Wilberforce of moral sub- stance, Luther of heroic substance, Howard of affectional substance ; and if we are lean in these 3O Substance and Show ; qualities, we are shadows, and all the bricks and mortar, land-deeds, certificates, and doubloons, in London cannot redeem us from being thinner than mush, a body-load of mist and fog. Character is the culminating substance of na- ture ; and we may say here that a man may be what he pleases to be. The forms of our activity are prescribed for us by nature, but circumstances do not make the real, central man. Circumstances often determine how much show a man shall make. To be famous depends on some fortuities ;' to be a president depends on the acute smellers of a few politicians and a mysterious set of wires ;. to be rich depends on birth or luck ; to be intel- lectually eminent may depend on the appointment of Providence ; but to be a man, in the sense of substance, depends solely on one's own noble ambition and determination to live in contact with God's open atmosphere of truth and right, from which all true manliness is inspired and fed. We often talk about ghosts, and wonder, sometimes, at our winter firesides whether any ghost has ever returned from the regions of the dead. For one, I am content to leave that question of revisits to be decided by Mrs. Crowe's " Night Side of Nature " and the vast and increasing crowd of spiritual rappers, who are able to make any luckless spirit beat a tattoo on smooth walnut or mahogany. Now, the answer we should give if anybody should ask us if we had ever seen a ghost will depend wholly on our standard of what a ghost or.; Facts and Forces. 31 is. Some men would not be satisfied unless they could shoot a bullet through him without injuring any intestines. Another would want to strike a club at him, and have it pass through as though it were six feet of moonshine. In Dickens's " Christ- mas Carol " the old miser was satisfied he beheld his dead partners ghost, when he looked right through his stomach and saw the buttons on the back of his coat. Any test which would prove that an unfortunate being had no body would satisfy most persons of its claim to ghostship. By any such standards we must probably give up the honor of having seen a ghost. And yet the world is plentifully spotted with apparitions ; they are all about us, in the streets and the stalls and the stores ; they are in the Congress rooms, and editors' chairs, and pulpits, transacting a great deal of the business of the world, not revisitants of the earth, because they have never left it, but shows of people, human haze and ghastliness, without the substance of energy, virtue, truth, to fill out the plain promise of their clothes. For our popular definition of a ghost is just the reverse of the truth ; it makes one consist of a soul without a body, while really a spectre, an illusion, a hum- bug of the eyesight and the touch, is a human body not 'vitalized through and through with a soul. When a person has only money to support his claim to substance, his highest nature is made up of mortgages and rent-rolls, notes and titles, a 32 Substance and Show; + man of bank paper, not of realities, and a com- mercial revolution would tear him up. Some men's claim to substance depends on a large stock of calicoes ; and a fall in J:he thermometer of trade reduces them to zero. -Where station is the sole basis of that claim, the person's soul is a great bladder blown up' by popular breath, and a pin-hole of accident will make him collapse. But of all those classes which the world puts for- ward as its darlings, the dandy is the most re- moved from the domain of real qualities and takes first rank as a ghost, since he is " a whis- kered essence and an organized perfume." The climax of my purpose in this address will be gained if it will lead any of you to see that the stuff a great soul is made of is the most real and unwasting material of the universe, some- thing which moth and rust cannot corrupt, nor death with the tooth of its savage chemistry im- pair. As men walk the streets they seem about alike ; the differences they show seem to be the difference of height, weight, complexion, and clothes. But it is not so. As you stand at a little distance from this metropolis, upon a hill that commands its avenues and circuit, you see of what various buildings, differing widely in cost and splendor, its beautiful panorama is composed. And so would its human inhabitants seem, if you could stand on some spiritual eminence and see the realities which their fleshly tenement conceal. .... Thence would we see the churches of our or, Facts and Forces. 33 spiritual city ; and over them, kindred but su- perior, with more intricate grace and capacious measure, the cathedral spirits, like such as Chan- ning, whose voices, are bells that call to worship, and whose thoughts, like spires, are always lifted above the world, conversing with light and God, rebuking the vanity of the earth, and shedding over all below the promise of immortality. 1851. ( LIBK Ui*l VKKS1TY CAL1FOKNIA. X= s II. THE LAWS OF DISORDER, UNTIL a more accurate and luminous for- mula suggests itself, I must announce the address which it is my privilege to offer you, under the paradoxical and vague title of " The Laws of Disorder.". Let me hope that the illus- trations to be brought forward will sufficiently in- terpret the fundamental purpose of the lecture, which is to show how laws wind into regions of nature and society that we never conceive of as subject to a plan and a purpose, but rather as cha- otic, or, at any rate, at loose ends. If a die should be thrown a million times, it would turn out that aces, trays, sixes, would ap- pear in about equal proportions. The result of each throw would be uncertain enough, but a man might stake his estate on the ratio of deuces or sixes in the million casts with less risk of loss than most of the lines of business are attended with. This fact, drawn from the logic of chances, furnishes the keynote of my lecture. The order which nature loves and weaves is not a stiff and laborious regularity, but an easy and beautiful play The Laws of Disorder. 35 with materials that seem to the senses huddled and anarchical, a harmony soaring, at last, out of independent, interlaced, and often tangled forces. We often say, for instance, that the order of the solar system is made up of two great forces, the centrifugal tendency of the planets and the gravi- tating energy of the sun. But this statement gives one no idea of the intricacy and complexity of the plan in which we live. If we could stand outside of any one of the planets in our family, we should not find it cutting a regular path in space in obe- dience to two simple forces, but beating this way and that, now swinging out towards its neighbor next beyond, and then reeling the other way to hail its fellow-orb whose path is next within, and so oscillating and whirling through all its months until it accomplishes its round. We should im- agine, could we see them very near, that the planets were let loose, to cut up capers in space, rather than to measure a marvellous harmony. The earth never travels the same track any two successive years, and yet it never fails to be punctual to the minute, and the fraction of a minute, when its revolutions should be accom- plished, but keeps time, in spite of its roving, more accurately than any machine of human in- vention can be made to do. The forces that whip and curb the planets suffer them to dally and prance and curvet on the great race-course of the ecliptic, but are sure to bring them in swift and 36 The Laws of Disorder. punctual to a second at the goal ; so that the order of the solar system is not the poise of two forces merely, but the balance of constant and countless perturbations of that poise. As though it were not enough to bring our globe around true to its second every year over a track of six hun- dred millions of miles, her path is changed every year, and still the time is kept exact ; and if it were not for the jaggedness, the continual shift- ing, and the seeming disorder of her orbit, the accuracy of her obedience and the stability of our harmony would be ruined. So the regularity of the mean temperature of any district is a striking instance of the secret play of law in a most frolicsome way. The wind is our type of inconstancy ; but a physical atlas of the globe will show us that its currents are about as well defined as the outlines of the continents. What is more uncertain than the weather a day or two from now, what more capricious than the changes of the weather during a week ? Yet the powers of vegetation are so nicely fitted to a cer- tain average temperature, that trees and plants would die if in the whole year, or in a succession of two or three years, the mean warmth should fall five degrees. Such a variation never takes place. Irregular as our winters are, and uncer- tain as the summer heat is, we get the needed result with wonderful precision when the tempera- tures of our three hundred and sixty-five days are shuffled together and brought to an average. Of The Laws of Disorder. 37 course, the electrical laws, the evaporating forces, the disturbances that generate winds, the way in which the earth turns to the sun every month and the swiftness of its rotatory motion, the laws of heat with respect to the earth, the water, and the air, are all balanced to each other as the condition of this order ; and the mean temperature is the beautiful figure which these shuttles that fly criss- cross and hap-hazard from all quarters of the uni- verse weave patiently, as a witness of providential order, into the warp of time. We find, too, that the minutest organizations on the earth's surface are so related to the largest and wildest forces of nature as to show wonderful delicacy and subtlety of law. When we see com- mon plants and shrubs growing so easily, we have no idea how the general order of the globe and sky is toned to their necessities. With regard to a common wild-flower, we may see that the force of gravitation which holds its fibres in the earth and strengthens its stalk is graduated so that, while it supports a constellation, it shall not prevent the juices from rising through its cells to carry life to the leaves. So the bulk and heat of the sun, the constitution of the air, the size of the sea, the swiftness of the earth's whirling and the diameter of its orbit, are determined with admi- rable relation to its need of heat and rain and wind, its alternations of light and gloom, and the changes of seasons from spring to winter. An alteration even of a slight percentage in the mix- 38 The Laws of Disorder. ture and partnership of these great forces would destroy the possibility of the daisy's life. But these brawny and furious powers are ordered to bend themselves carefully to the needs of the most delicate structures ; and every flower is so nice an index of the adjustment between the forces of the universe, that one might believe, looking at it ex- clusively, the globe and the solar system were built by the Almighty as a factory to turn out the violets which embroider the spring. In the methods of atomic combinations, also, a striking instance of the same subtle presence of law is seen. Everything we see in nature is a chemical compound, and an analyst can untwist its component elements and show them in their simplicity. And various as the mixtures are, it is found that a splendid regularity rules over them. Separate the parts of water, for instance, and we get 8 parts oxygen to i part hydrogen. Now, whenever oxygen and hydrogen combine in any substance, it will be in a ratio of which 8 is the basis. There may be 16 parts oxygen to i hydro- gen, or 24 parts to i, or 40 to i ; but no instance can be found, no substance in all known nature, in which the ratio will be 9 to i or 7 to i, or any other than strictly 8 or some multiple of 8. So we find that carbon will combine with other substances only in the ratio of which 6 is the key, nitrogen in a proportion of 14 or some of its mul- tiples, iron by parts represented by 28, gold by 199, etc. Thus it is plain that the invisible atoms The Laws of Disorder. 39 of things are under strictest chemical drill, and, stir them together as we may, they will file by regular platoons, and only according to the origi- nal word of command, into steady combinations. The science of botany has unfolded some very singular and beautiful facts which contribute richly to the illustration of our subject. Many of the most important plants and trees are dependent, as to their fruit-bearing, upon intermediate agencies that carry perhaps from a great distance the vege- table, dust or pollen to the flower of the plant by which it is made productive. The whole date- harvest in some countries of the East, on which the sustenance of millions of men depends, is intrusted to the fidelity of the winds, which sweep the quickening seed-dust sometimes even across Sahara to the waiting germens of the fruit-bear- ing palm. Sometimes insects are the mediating agents between the different trees. The fig-trade of Smyrna, and the food of thousands of our race, is dependent on the yearly fidelity of the gall-fly, which carries in season the needed stimulant from tree to tree. So the Syrian silk-plant is made productive by the bees that, in search of nectar, carry on their waxen thighs the feathery principle of life from flower to flower. And so the increase of the Kamschatkan lily, by whose bulbs some- times the whole population of Greenland is saved from starvation in a hard winter, is suspended on the regular theft of a kind of beetle which carries the quickening principle of growth to the plant, 4O The Laivs of Disorder. when it means only to steal its own support. Thus the one beneficent purpose of Providence is se- cured year by year through means that seem to be chances or accidents : what seems fluctuating disorder to the senses is the easy and joyous pulse of law. Thus the great force and beauty of the argu- ment against atheism, as constructed by modern science, lie in this, that so many independent laws conspire in producing the regularity and system of Nature. One might conceive that out of the tumultuous heavings of chaos for ages some gen- eral order might turn up at last ; but a mechan- ism so intricate as our globe displays, and yet so delicate, perfected by a thousand junctions and conspiracies of separate threads of design, the failure of any one of which would entangle the skein, what length of ages seems sufficient to produce so many beneficent concurrences of acci- dent, what calculus of probabilities is able to state the infinitesimal likelihood of such a system happening into existence ? We may represent it in this way. A heap of types many millions in number might be tossed up so that every now and then they would fall into combinations of words. But can you con- ceive of a throw that should leave them in words grammatically joined, so that each independent sentence would be readable ? Now try to imagine what chance there is that a throw could happen in which the separate sensible sentences should make TJie Laws of Disorder. 41 consecutive paragraphs? And when you have tried that calculation, think of a throw occurring in which the types should fall so that words fit into sentences, sentences into paragraphs, and these again into chapters, nay, perhaps rhymes or measured lines, paragraphs and chapters giving you a Waverley novel or a tragedy of Shakespeare or the Iliad of Homer, not only connected grammatical sense, but characters drawn and re- lated to each other, the finest strokes of genius visible in the subordinate portions, and all fitting into a subtle unity which the most cultivated critic studies with greatest marvel and delight ! There you have the problem of atheism partially pre- sented in the light of science now. The unity and harmony of the natural world are analogous to the unity and symmetry of a printed work of genius ; and so the doctrine of chances ridicules the theory of cha?ice. A whole lecture might be devoted to the beau- tiful proofs from the physical world for the play of law amid seemingly chaotic and accidental facts ; but I must pass on and invite your atten- tion to the most striking illustrations that may be drawn from society. The idea very seldom enters any mind that there is any organization of society at all except that which men deliberately produce by rules of laws or by military force. The general feeling is that outside these arbitrary arrangements social facts are casual and at loose ends. But the truth is, that the order which man makes in society 42 The Laws of Disorder. is very slight compared with that which secret forces make, over which he has no control, and whose processes human wisdom cannot fathom at all. No statutes of human enactment, no progress of the age, no increase of scientific, educational, or mechanical advantages, nothing in the range of human wisdom and power, is of such vital im- portance to the interests and growth of society as that there should be in every generation a particu- lar and stable proportion between the men and women that inhabit the globe. The idea of set- ting a man to guess how many boys and how many girls there are in each household of Boston would seem ridiculous ; and yet extend your sur- vey to the State of Massachusetts or to New Eng- land, and a mathematician will tell you with sur- prising correctness, not only what the proportion of boys to girls is now, but also what it will be in the next generation. Looking over this civilized world, we find that the ratio of births is always one hundred and six males to one hundred females. Various speculations have been entertained as to the cause for this preference by Providence of a slight excess of the sterner sex. Some have said that it is to compensate for the wastes of war and to furnish material for standing armies; others have imagined that it is Nature's method of supplying candidates for the Catholic priesthood ; again, it has been suggested that civilization needs the peculiar influence that is shed into society from a certain number of old bachelors, the delicate The Laws of Disorder. 43 aroma and flavor they impart to civilization, like the drops of lemon in a punch, or mustard in a salad, and therefore that the constitution of things ordains that there must be four or five per cent at least of the masculine race for whom no part- ners are furnished in the waltz of life ; but per- haps the most philosophical and satisfactory rea- son is that which a lady gave me the other day, namely, that it is to insure an equilibrium of character, this inequality being Nature's subtle way of confessing that a hundred women amount to as much, any day, as one hundred and six men. But whatever theory we adopt, here is the won- derful fact that this proportion continues century by century, upholding civilization by its mysterious constancy. If it should alter by any considerable percentage in favor of a large majority of males, civilization would be encircled by a ferocity as pleasant to contemplate as a circle of wolves belt- ing the huts of settlers in the forest! If it should alter in favor of a large majority of women, the present discussions and movements in favor of women's rights would simply change the gender of their pronouns, and the position of Mrs. Abby Folsom in a public meeting now would be a type of masculine influence and heroism among the feminine autocrats and politicians. Moreover, subordinate to this general law which fixes the proportions of births, we may see a sin- gular and unfailing order in the boundless diver- sity of expression produced out of the general 44 The Lazvs of Disorder. likeness of features among people. It is very difficult for an artist to conceive and chisel a new face out of the proportions of the Greek outline, or any strong national type. Yet out of the mil- lions living in any large country, out of the hun- dreds of millions on the globe, nay, out of the myriads of millions since Adam, scarcely any two could be mistaken for each other. And all this is effected by dissimilarities so slight, when measured by the compass, as to seem of no consequence when mathematically stated. Nature distinguishes the red-haired people from each other as easily as the brown and black heads; pug noses are dis- criminated most happily; dark complexions do not confuse the individualities of countenance ; no two pairs of blue or hazel eyes are steeped with the same gentleness or brilliancy ; and even the Chi- nese, who look certainly to an uneducated eye like a monotonous nation of universal twins, no doubt seem to their* own visual organs broken up into distinguishable personalities. Now, we need not reflect long to discover the various and indispensable benefits of this beauti- ful law. How apparent it is that the subtlest pleasures of social intercourse, the possibilities of friendship, the interesting arts and the delicate joys of courtship, and even the solemn interests of jus- tice, hang upon these fine distinctions in the faces of people. Of how trifling avail would laws be, if men could hide their guilty personalities under a mask of universal resemblance, so that the rogue The Laws of Disorder. 45 need only say in the court-room, where fifty copies of himself perhaps surrounded the bench, " Thou canst not say I did it." In case of marriage, too, the only question for a person to decide would be what age he or she would prefer for husband or wife, taking the first that offers ; the only sure way of proving identity would be for persons to wear tickets with proper labels, attested by the minister or court, "This may certify that I am Henry Johnson's wife," or " This is proof that I have married Sarah Jones " ; while the ludicrous experiences of the two Dromios in Shakespeare would be the keynote of daily life, and society would be a magnificent " Comedy of Errors." The illustration may be light, but is not the fact suggestive and sublime, that hidden laws alto- gether beyond human will provide for this diversity of expression on which the glory of society de- pends, and .do it all so easily and within such moderate limits that nature seldom strays into a monstrosity, seldom offends us with Albinas and bearded women, Aztec children and Siamese twins? Some of the statistics concerning the physical development of man are quite interesting. Thus it is a law of nature that the pulse shall vary by regular gradation by the increase of years. The hearts of the infants on the planet six months old are tiny time-keepers, beating one hundred and thirty-seven strokes a minute, at a year old one hundred and twenty-six beats a minute, at two years old one hundred and twenty, and so by 46 The Laws of Disorder. regular decrease till in maturity it is from seventy- five to eighty, and in old age from sixty to sixty-five. Those, therefore, who complain of the restless ac- tivity of children might as well complain that the minute hand of a watch moves faster than the hour hand. Stop the fever in their veins, and you may stop their mischief, their disquiet, and their glee. By these swift and constant pulses through their arteries Nature tells us that she will have all the children alike in the quickness of their motion, the agility and spirit of their intellect, the keen- ness of their sensibility, and calls on all parents and teachers to graduate the laws of their home and the customs of the school to the motion of blood that is faster than the fever-speed. So in regard to growth there is law. All the children of the world gain nearly eight inches in height the first year of their existence, gaining two fifths from their birth to that period ; during the second year, the gain is one seventh ; during the third, one eleventh ; and so on in regular gradations till increasing height terminates, which in man is a little after twenty-five and in woman about twenty. Those who live in affluence are generally taller than those who do not; those who live in town at the age of nineteen are taller than those who live in the country. The stature we reach is about three and a fourth times greater than our measurement at birth, and our weight almost twenty times as much. At twelve years old, the two sexes weigh about the same. Man The Laws of Disorder. 47 attains the maximum of his weight at about forty, and woman at about fifty. As to mortality, the statistical tables all bear wit- ness to secret and constant laws. We talk of the uncertainty of life ; and with regard to the duration of any particular person's existence, nothing can seem to be more uncertain. But take a city oi state into account, and we can prophecy with sin- gular accuracy how many of any ten thousand infants will live to be a year old ; how many will pass on to two, three, and five years ; how many will weather the diseases and dangers of youth ; in a word, what number will be sifted out by each year into the grave, and how few will be left at eighty, ninety, and one hundred to tell of a gen- eration that has gone down into the dust. It is impossible to designate, or calculate, the particu- lar individuals that will fulfil this law ; but the law itself will hold as rigidly as the rule of three. We may even foretell what proportions of those that die will be males and what females ; what diseases will carry them off; how many will die of brain, of liver, of lung, or stomach disorders ; what months will be most disastrous ; what profes- sions and trades will send the largest percentage to the tomb; and among what classes of occupa- tion those who live the longest will be distributed. We may mention here what an aged clergyman said, not long ago, of bronchitis, which does so much to swell the profits of transatlantic naviga- tion : " Seems to me, I never heard of bron- 48 The Laws of Disorder. chitis till they began to talk about the independ- ence of the pulpit." The law of the statistics of any ten or twenty years is the law for the statis- tics of the next ten and the next twenty ; except when there has been increase of cleanliness and of sanitary fidelity on the part of governments, for this care reaches directly into the census-tables, and reduces at once the percentage of mortality. We know with what confidence life-insurance offices rely upon the stability of law with regard to the duration of existence. They may lose on Mr. A. or Mr. B., but they lay their premiums so that on ten thousand lives they are sure of the result, and can foretell the profit they will make. Life-insurance, dealing in risks and staking on accidents, stands in the front rank of those lines of business in which there is no uncertainty. In the more literal sense of the term, the dis- orders of the world obey some law. For the dis- eases to which the human body is subject have their order. The variety of them, the regularity of the symptoms, the methodical stages of their progress, the spiritual uses they serve, show that the same providence which is manifested in our health and the symmetry of our organs is hidden in the disorders that afflict us. All measles have the same stamp. Fevers are classified, and train in companies with uniform. Contributions to natural theology as rich and conclusive can be made from the laws of malady as from the health- ful action of our frames. A distinguished phy- The Laws of Disorder. 49 sician of Dublin pulished, two or three years ago, a very interesting work called " God in Disease," to illustrate the subtle plan and under-current of beneficence in the sickness of mankind. Nature is no Vandal in destroying our health : she does not attack the frame usually with a lawless bat- tering-ram, but takes down the pillars and orna- ments and roofing of our bodily temple very carefully and systematically, as though she was packing up the parts for shipment to another clime. Even crime is not incalculable. The lawless elements in human nature, the anarchy in a state, obeys a law. The moral darkness, the social neglects, and the inward depravities of a state or nation, reveal themselves steadily in a remarkably constant proportion of criminals and of the kinds of criminals. So that the problem would not be at all insoluble, How many forgers, burglars, murderers, and counterfeiters will New England turn out next year? It could more easily be ciphered than the number of bales of manufac- tured goods which our factories will supply could be forecast. The scamp element is less subject to fluctuation in society than the cotton element ; and in regard to cotton, its moral influence upon the politics and feelings of New England would be a question admitting of surer prophecy than the amount of money to be made on it. Thus we find it continues true that about one man in every six hundred and fifty in France is a 3 D 50 The Laws of Disorder. criminal (beginning with the Emperor). And a moral map of the country has been drawn, show- ing definitely shaded districts within which crimes against persons or crimes against property are shown to be predominant, steady moral causes lying underneath which reveal themselves in these different disturbances of order. So the number taken in charge by the police in London and other great cities for drunkenness and disorder keeps, week by week, the same percentage, except where the Maine Liquor Law jumps with a con- stable's pole into the arena ; then the number is very sensibly reduced. It is discovered that the number of suicides observes a constant proportion to the number of people. A statistician can tell how many per- sons will take their life in Paris during the next two or three years ; the proportion of these that will hang, drown, poison, and shoot themselves, and also between what hours most of such deaths will occur. For it is a fact that between six and eight-in the morning is the most fatal time, and that while suicides between twenty and thirty years old prefer to die by the bullet, those be- tween fifty and sixty, which furnish the largest number, select the rope. It is singular how the most out-of-the-way facts, when rigidly inspected, betray a curious order. Thus it is found in the post-offices of large cities that mistakes and oversights of direction, and the number of letters mailed without addresses, is, The Laws of Dis&dler\ 5 f 1{ V> A i* . < /^ ' 'S' / * year by year, proportionately th4 ^irne. ^ And } w " Guaranty Society " was formed a few yelars/ agjo in London to insure the integrity of clerks, secre-/ < taries, and collectors. The instances of dishon- esty were so regular, that by clubbing all the clerks and taxing each one a slight sum, they could be security for each other on the principle of fire or life insurance. So railroad and steam- ship accidents keep a sufficiently steady ratio to indicate some law and order in their confusion. As to shipwrecks, it is said the average is one to every tide, the storm spirit levying that tax upon the world's commerce to offset the general safety of the sea. It was the " London Punch," I believe, that made a mathematical demonstra- tion, a few months ago, of the folly of ever ex- pecting to go to the moon by railroad. (No mat- ter, it said, if a track should be laid and the trains start regularly from this planet, and the passengers get ticketed through, the case is hope- less. Scientific calculations show, it said, that one hundred and eighty thousand miles is the ut- most limit that any train could travel without a perfect smash-up, by series of disasters, axle-break- ings, collisions, explosions, open draws, snake- heads, spreading of tracks, snow-storms, etc. ; and as the distance to the moon is two hundred and forty thousand miles, it follows, by arithmetic, that every train would be demolished and all the passengers used up by the time they had gone three quarters of the distance.) It is affirmed, 52 The Laws of Disorder. also, now, as a settled truth, that the number of those who draw any tolerable prizes in lotteries is about the same as the number of those who are struck by lightning. So that a man has only to ask himself, when about to try that species of gambling, what he is willing to pay for the likeli- hood of a visit from a thunderbolt, and offer his cash as a conductor. So it is reported that of the five hundred and thirty-seven young ladies who fainted the last year, it is quite remarkable that only two fell upon the floor. Somewhere, too, I have seen it stated that if on a public road you meet a party of four women, it is at least fifty to one that they are all laughing ; whereas, if you meet an equal party of my own unhappy sex, you may wager, safely, that they are talking gravely, and that one of them is uttering the -word " money." Mr. Beecher has lately, I believe, discovered that the proportion of ministers' sons who turn out rascals is two and a half per cent, thus deducting ninety-seven and a half per cent from the truth of the maxim that " ministers' sons are the devil's grandsons." Thus the survey of the tables of birth and death in all their minuteness, and of other eccentric statistics, justifies the remark of an essayist, that if you find one man in fifty, in any community, who eats his shoes and marries his grandmother, you may be sure that all over the world it will turn out that one man in fifty eats his shoes and marries his grandmother. Perhaps I have delayed too long an allusion to The Laws of Disorder. 53 the curious columns which the records of marriage offer as contributions to our subject. Not only the proportion of marriages is generally the same, but the ages of the parties maintain regular relations. Moreover, statistics are continually forcing upon, our notice a fixed percentage of repentant old bach- elors ; also of young bachelors that marry widows ; also of young women that marry old men and of widowers that renew their vows ; while the ratio of second, third, and fourth marriages is very constant. It is no more singular than true that eccentric unions are as regular as the more natural ones. In- deed, it has most profanely come to pass that, just as the stars are nothing but points of vast triangles and diagrams to a cold-blooded astronomer, so every unmarried woman in the community stands as an algebraic symbol to the eye of a social mathematician : if she is twenty years old, repre- senting three quarters of a likelihood that she will change her name ; if twenty-five, standing for one quarter of the same possibility ; if thirty, reduced to a fraction of one divided by ten ; and then decreasing in a geometrical ratio which it would hardly be polite to put into figures here. On the contrary, a man of twenty-five represents the frac- tion one-half as to the probabilities of marriage, which is so vulgar a fraction that most young men of that period- strive ardently to annihilate it by finding the other and better half which restores their integrity. This last point suggests the fact that even love 54 The Laws of Disorder. indefinable, capricious, romantic, as we often think it is most delicately restricted within bounds of law. No doubt every young lady in her early dreams is very particular as to the looks and quality of the youth that shall gain her heart. He must be the very flower of the human race. And every young man is equally dainty in his reveries concerning his ideal partner. She must be the very flower of the human race. But the stock of Adam does not bear flowers enough to supply this wide de- mand of perfection ; so that if we should compare the dreams which are in the hearts of youths of both sexes, nothing would seem so hopeless as to match the world in the long contra-dance of mar- riage. Plato, in one of his dialogues, worked out a sportive fancy that the human race was originally created so that each was complete, the proper partner of each soul being joined to it from birth. But as the race was altogether too happy and in- dependent thus, Jupiter cut the blissful couples in two, as quinces are divided before they are pre- served, and then dispersed them over the planet. So, he said, that each person is the counterpart of another human creature, and goes about seeking its complement. The happiness of every mar- riage, he maintained, depends on finding the real half that belongs to the soul ; all unhappy ones are false assortments, the man sometimes not being a fair match for the woman, and very often the woman being an overmatch for the man. Now if the difficulties of mating people happily were The Laws of Disorder. 55 as great as they should seem beforehand, if there were not a large probability that those ex- quisite feminine dreams should embody themselves in the young man that really offered his "hand, transforming him into the Adonis ; or if the celes- tial ideal of the youth did not, after a while, almost surely interfuse itself into the form and glorify the face of some young lady not far from his own terrestrial latitude and longitude, what a miserable world we should have of it ! Senti- mental Raphaels pensive and melancholy over the mocking beauty of their reveries, a world love- sick for ghosts ! But Providence has ordained that love shall wear the gossamer harness of law ; and so the race falls into line, two and two, by mar- riages that are generally happy, as naturally and regularly as the animals walked two and two into the ark. Indeed, as we take the moral world more strictly into the domain of our survey, the results are more marvellous. Society is an immense organization, intellectually and morally, as well as politically and by statute. As to conservative and radical tendencies, it has a structure as de- fined as the relation between nerves and bones in the physical frame. In every community there are enough of those restless by constitution, and reformatory by vision, to prevent society from sinking into stupid lethargy ; while the majority are made to be reverent of the past, content with the present, and needing great stimulant and the 56 The Laws of Disorder. pressure of great wrong to provoke them into attitudes of resistance or the countenance of revolutionary schemes. This is a matter of birth and temperament, resulting from the infusion of different classes of sentiment into the original structure of souls ; and thus permanent basis is provided for the strong and solid growth of civil- ization. In fact, it is a decree of our organization that the reformer himself shall grow conservative after he is forty or forty-five, while the shell of the natural Hunker hardens on him then like the case of the crocodile. If a generation should be born in which no fiery souls with burning demo- cratic instincts and hopes, impatient for the future, should appear, society would be like a long train of cars without an engine. And if, for once, all the individuals of a race should grow up scornful of past wisdom and rabid for advance, social Jehus, what a moral stampede would be ex- hibited ! A general rush on all sides for no par- ticular object except " the good time coming," making society like a long train of engines, each with the steam up, each crowding the one ahead, but with no train attached, no passengers or freight, everybody an engineer or fireman, and bound for no place in particular, only for prog- ress as long as the track will hold out ! How beautiful, too, is the law that distributes multitudes of society into different occupations, thus insuring a full development of social good ! Different callings are provided for by inborn The Laws of Disorder. 57 tastes. Nature predestines some of our race to be sailors. They are baptized to be agents and expressmen of the world's commerce by the spray of the sea. Their fancy in childhood is busy with the restless waves ; their hearts are cradled in young dreams upon the maternal swell of the deep, and the " Pirate's Own Book " only adds the charm of danger to the other invitations away from the comforts of a settled life which the bil- lows whisper to them. So the classes of farmers and mechanics, of merchants, surveyors, and engineers, have natures among them predestined by their aptitudes to be eminent and successful. Many have an inborn passion for an adventurous life ; explorers, pion- eers, settlers of states, frontiersmen, the first on the ground in Californias and Australias, burrow- ers after buried Ninevehs ; while there are others whom no temptations could induce to abandon the settled ways and regular comforts of home. Some, moreover, are foreordained to be mathema- ticians ; in childhood, Euclid is their story-book. A few are appointed to be poets ; they lisp in numbers, for the numbers come. Others are com- pelled to be artists ; while here and there a musi- cian starts up in whose heart winged melodies nestle that by and by visit a thousand homes and charm the attention of a grateful world. Every profession, too, finds those that have its stamp upon them, marked by nature to be physicians or instructors, lawyers, legislators, or clergymen. 3* 58 The Laws of Disorder. Each of the sciences has its predetermined vota- ries ; for there are eyes that turn spontaneously to the sky ; men like Kepler, Newton, Laplace, Herschel, Le Verrier, as much ordained to track the stars as the stars are ordained to move and shine ; tastes, too, there are that find their nutriment in chemistry, in botany, in optics and statics, in geology and mineralogy ; while the bees find their poets, the birds impassioned Au- dubon, the animalcules their delighted analysts, every tribe of animals its biographer and critic, and every bone, nerve, and disorder of the human frame its preordained anatomist and skilful bene- factor. With regard to the rarer manifestations of liter- ary character and tastes some law seems to hold. There are always enough with a delicate appetite for old wisdom to give the best authors of the past an appreciative audience, and continually renew their dress in modern type. Critics do not fail, who shall be nice tasters and appraisers of the great creative and constructive minds. We find, too, that every community is supplied with anti- quarians, mousers of genealogies, rummagers of old print-shops and pamphlet-baskets, autograph- collectors, coin-fanciers, microscopic sceptics who must have a focal blaze upon every received fact of history ; whitewashes of old rascalities who find subtle reasons to reverse the judgment of centuries, and to turn Catiline and Tiberius Cae- sar, Richard III., Robespierre, and Napoleon into The Laws of Disorder. 59 unrecognized and injured saints. A fixed per- centage also seems to limit the number of those who shall carry on the ultra-abolition meetings, and carry on in them. So the Women's Rights conventions, Fourier newspapers and plans, the Kossuth hats and Bloomer costume, Second Ad- vent Miller, and the Mormon Bible are in pre- established harmony with a certain proportion of every civilized community that must be fed on excitements, extravagances, and vagaries. The social world has been compared to a vast board with all kinds of apertures in it, square, three- cornered, queer, crooked, and every generation to a set of plugs carved by Providence into shapes to fit the openings. But alas ! on one point sta- tistics begin to stand aghast ; percentage and pro- portions have rapidly risen till we begin to ask what limit shall be set to the number of mediums that can throw healthy chairs into fits and make a sober table tipsy, or the believers in the univer- ccelum who take the wrigglings of furniture for inspiration, and delight in the electric jigs of a ghost on smooth walnut and mahogany. We all know with what beautiful accuracy the wastes of the human body are supplied with blood, how the right proportion of nutriment is carried to every limb and organ and each particle of the skin. Thus the various limbs and organs of society are refreshed and restored by the new currents 6f population which feed its veins against the wastes of death. With regard to masculine 60 The Laws of Disorder. and feminine elements, it is plain and it is well that the proportion does not fluctuate ; for society depends not only upon the continued ratio be- tween men and women, but also on the continu- ance of the manly and feminine type of character underneath the wide diversities of individuals in each sex. The women's rights movement is wise and wholesome to this extent, that it is bringing into prominence the ministry and the worth of the feminine side of the social organism. The next great movement in civilization, we may believe, will be to bring this into equipoise with the energy and strength of man, so that the finer and softer qualities of the other sex, with all the wisdom that may ripen upon them and all the influence that must belong to them when perfected, shall become of account in education and appear in the com- plexion of society. The demands that women shall have equal political authority with men, be legislators, merchants, commodores, and generals, are only the momentary contortions of a move- ment that has deep roots and immense impor- tance, founded in the necessity, for the sake of social health, that women should be more than elegant autocrats of the kitchen, graceful orna- ments of the parlor and ball-room, and walking advertisements of lace-stores and bonnet-rooms ; that they shall become sources of qualities which shall make society refined as well as strong, cover it with affections and sensibilities that enwrap its vigor, and save it from standing to our imagi- The Laws of Disorder. 6 1 nation like a bony and slab-sided Yankee, hard, calculating, arid shrewd, uncouth, irreverent, and clumsy. Let those who would be acquainted with the best sense upon this vexed and vexing ques- tion obtain the published lectures of Mr. Mann. In further illustration of this organization in society, we may say that some men do for it the service of an eye ; others of a brain ; others again of the lungs ; some are its muscles, some its feet, some its hands. Historians stand for the faculty of memory in the large human nature of which we are a part ; poets and artists its imagination ; he- roes its enthusiasm ; mechanics its constructive- ness ; soldiers its brutal bumps behind the ears ; believers its reverence; saints its love and hope. These, and all the functions essential to the grand man, are supplied steadily to the character of society by the new nutriment that bubbles up through the fresh comers into the world to restore the wastes of death. In some periods one faculty is developed more than another, and progress consists in the strong and equable development of the great organs, brain, heart, and lungs, which the prominent orders represent ; but society is never without all these organs in some degree of vigor. And we cannot reflect too reverently on the laws of this permanence established by Provi- dence. If all the great men of one generation should be endowed, as some of them are, with despotic tendencies to one line of study, if men were not made to be equally eminent in walks so 62 The Laws of Disorder. wide apart as statesmanship, science, law, me- chanical ingenuity, the pulpit, mercantile life, if foe a single half-century there should be a dead level of capacity in every line of power but one, how would civilization surfer ! To use the perti- nent metaphor of St. Paul : " If the whole body were an eye, where were the hearing? if the whole were hearing, where were the smelling?" And the conclusion of St. Paul is the one we are brought to by considering the subtile provisions for the welfare of society : " But now hath God set the members every one of them in the body as it hath pleased him that there should be no schism, but that the members should have the same care one for another." Just as every army has its grade of officers, from the corporal to the chief, society has its com- missioned men, who prevent the race from falling into disorder and keep it in a regular march. With regard to labor we talk of a law of demand and supply which determines how many men shall be miners, iron-workers, factory-hands, shoe- makers, carpenters, blacksmiths. But this law does not account for the great poets, discoverers, reformers, and constructive thinkers of history. They are born, not made by circumstances. And if every crisis seems to have its great man ready, if every great opportunity seems to be met by some man that fits it, it is not because the crisis or opportunity makes the man, but provokes him out, that he may show himself in his grand pro- TJie Laws of Disorder. 63 portions of power, as God made him. The needs of the Hebrew people in their Egyptian slavery were answered by a Moses ; but was it those needs that wove the faculties of Moses into his frame, fitting him to be their deliverer and law- giver? Was it any set of circumstances that we can comprehend which stretched the musical nerves of David upon his body, or kindled in another heart the enthusiastic fire of a Paul, that has warmed the air of the world ? Was it by the coarse law of demand and supply that a Colum- bus was haunted by the ghost of a round planet, at the time when the New World was needed for the interests of civilization, or that a Luther sprung up with a brain and energy competent to organize a new movement for human liberty ? Can we tell why it was that a Shakespeare rose from the crowd of boys which an English village bore, or a Milton started up to refresh the re- ligious sense with the sound of majestic music and the sight of an athletic virtue ? Was it the necessities of our country that built the grand architecture of Washington's patriotism ? or, rath- er, was it not most fortunate for us that Provi- dence did not suffer the crisis to come without first fashioning a nature competent to be its rep- resentative and guide ? And, standing in the shadow of our last great man's departure, should we not consider whether it is by any wisdom that we can understand, that such a stately intellect was ordained to be the guest of that massive 64 The Laws of Disorder. brow, that such a stalwart understanding rose up by the side of the Constitution, ready, at the criti- cal period, to be its interpreter and defence, and that the tongue which Nature gave him was made minister of an eloquence that echoes back to De- mosthenes ? No ! great men are made for us, and the law by which every generation supplies one or two of such in every line of human labor is a law which Providence has secretly estab- lished and which is sustained for our welfare, that truth may steadily advance, that the ranks of the race may always have their competent captains and generals, and that civilization shall not stag- nate and waste away. In regard to the tastes of people for food, there is singular uniformity of law supporting wide diversities of appetite. Some persons would n't touch a cabbage ; to others an onion is an abom- ination ; with others a turnip is a kind of produce that produces a quality which the word represents upon the nose ; many will not look at condiments and spices ; and there are those to whom a goose, or a leg of venison, or a dish of eels, or a rabbit, or a mess of pork and greens, is perfectly repulsive. And yet, as a whole, the civilized stomach is very catholic ; and all the produce of the fields, from parsnips up to peaches, finds a ready welcome, and the diversity of the tastes 'keeps commerce busy, as the purveyor of appetite, and all the tribes of the earth and the sea that are eatable travel and swim towards the larder and the kitchen. The Laws of Disorder. 65 The different races have the bump of alimentive- ness split up queerly and regularly between them ; the Hibernian Celts, with a little assistance from the Dutch, pay their respects to the cabbages ; the Saxons attack the beef and mutton ; the French celebrate the creative goodness that made onions and frogs ; the Chinese pride themselves on rats ; the Esquimaux attend to all the waste whale-blubber ; Italians rejoice in macaroni ; and the unsqueamish army of beggars devour what they can get. Statisticians call for statistics. I would respectfully suggest to them this : " Jack Sprat could eat no fat, His wife could eat no lean ; Betwixt them both they cleared the cloth, And licked the platter clean." In any family of eight or ten we shall find that tastes are related to the roast turkey as skilfully as those of Mr. Sprat and his wife were bal- anced. There are so many that love white meat, so many that can eat nothing but dark meat, two that prefer a wing, two that lie in wait for the drumsticks, and as surely as there is a wish-bone will there be a demand at least equal to the supply. Now, whether we conceive the turkey as prefigured for the family, or the family tastes as an after arrangement, the order is equally admi- rable, and bears ample witness to the prudence of nature. In riding in the stage-coaches also in New Hampshire, among the mountains, I have been E 66 The Laws of Disorder. . compelled to notice the admirable distribution of characters in every load of twenty-five : how there are always sixteen that prefer the places for eight on the outside, and how of these two are always clergymen and one a doctor, one has travelled in the Alps and can give you comparative criti- cisms ; one is a grumbler and thinks the moun- tains humbugs, puffed up by hotel-keepers and stage-proprietors to gull the public; one is a punster, and one a Southerner ; nine and a baby that could not ride anywhere but on the inside seats ; three of the nine that can ride backwards without discomfort ; and how regularly it happens that the baby is gifted with a taste for music, and shows its lineage from Adam by its crying sin. Among the other steady relations I have spoken of as belonging to society, the fact may be men- tioned that the idiots and the insane are in regu- lar ratio to the whole population. The deaf and dumb, too, maintain a strict proportion to the bulk of society. According to the last census there were 9,717 deaf-mutes in the United States. A careful calculation will show that these are just about enough to furnish the proper number of legislators for the whole country. May we not guess that Providence intends that this unfortu- nate class should be educated to be our repre- sentatives and senators ? Then we should have deliberative assemblies. No speeches for Bun- combe, no lobbying, and the most eloquent man would surely be he that should make the best The Laws of Disorder. 67 motions. Our feminine reformers insist that things will not go right till ladies are elected par- tially to represent the nation, which would relieve us about as pouring oil on a fire would soothe a conflagration ; but we think true patriotism will seriously consider whether the deaf and dumb are not born to be our lawmakers. There could be, it is true, no Speaker of the House, but we should not need one, for there would be no speakers in the House. Ruffianism of language would be avoided, for how absurd to call a man a liar by the fingers ; and justice would be more likely to be done to the great interests of a nation, in the solemn silence of such a conclave, than it is now amid the general chatter which is intended, not to elucidate the subject, but to fetch an echo of ap- plause from home. If we reflect upon it carefully, we shall be struck also, I think, with the marvellous secret and constant action of the laws which superin- tend the growth of national life. In the case of every individual there is steady development of character and unity of experience from childhood to old age. All the powers, memory, sensation, reason, wit, imagination, conscience, are vitally welded together into one consciousness, so that often the sins of the past are punished in the present, and the rewards of goodness are received from the bright hopes which the blended fancy and conscience paint upon the future. Now, by a law of which this is only a miniature, every 68 The Laws of Disorder. nation has a distinct character to which all its individuals contribute and which successive gen- erations help to develop. Think what boundless personal peculiarities there are in the millions that make up a great kingdom ; and yet the na- tional type is distinctly marked to a vivid imagi- nation. The qualities of the Irish character re- main the same through centuries ; the difference between a Frenchman to-day and a Gaul of two thousand years ago is a difference which the polytechnic school and the dancing-master make, that is, a difference of polish, not of substance ; and the Jew with his old clothes now is essen- tially the Jew of Herod's and Pilate's days. How easily we typify national qualities, and make our pictures of Brother Jonathan, John Bull, Johnny Crapeau, and the Russian Bear, thus proving that each empire is a grand man, and unites all the varieties of temperament and qualities in its citi- zens into a constant expression, as the different elements of character in a person run together into a distinct and constant countenance ! A re- cent physiognomist has called attention to this fixity of national types, by showing, in an odd way, that different national faces have always a marked resemblance to certain animals. Thus, Prussians resemble cats, Germans look like lions (though the Hungarians seem, in our country at least, to turn most easily to lions), Chinamen favor hogs, Yankees humanize the physiognomy of bears, and Persians have the likeness of pea- cocks entailed upon them. The Laws of Disorder. 69 The beneficent results of this constancy of national character are very various. Without it there would be no stability to society, no moral order in civilization. If there was no certainty that the next generation in a country should pos- sess essentially the same qualities with their fa- thers, if the Irish might produce a race of English temperaments, and France give birth to a colony of German or Italian heads and hearts, and Amer- ica rear a race of stolid, quiet, ease-loving China- men or Turks, with no go-ahead infused into their blood, of course history would be like a succes- sion of cross-readings of a newspaper. It would be exactly as if men might sleep away their char- acters and moral identity, the honest man at night waking up a scamp in the morning, the cow- ard shifted into a moral hero, the thrifty man into a loafer, the Hunker into a furious Abolitionist, and the cotton-planter transmuted into an enthu- siastic patron of " Uncle Tom's Cabin." This constancy of national temperament and character shows its beneficent influence in litera- ture. There are national literatures, just as there are national languages and peculiarities of feature and expression. The English imagination and pathos, the French keenness and brilliancy, the Spanish romance, the German subtlety, and the Jewish reverence run through all their intellectual activity; and so the intellectual world has consist- ency and permanence, the literatures of nations being, for diversity and consequent charm, like the 70 The Laws of Disorder. conversation of a circle of cultivated gentlemen, one wise and sombre, one gay and witty, one filled with sprightly recollections and anecdote, one scientific, another poetic, this one religious, that one gloomy, here an artist and there a sage. In respect of literature, as a general thing we may say that there are statistics of genius : the inventive powers come first to maturity, judgment ripens more slowly, and the highest dramatic and poetic capacities find their perfection, the tragic from thirty-five to forty, and the comic, which de- mands clearer insight and a cooler poise of the brain, from forty to fifty. There seems to be a law, too, which determines that great genius shall come in clusters upon the branches of national history. The culminating periods of intellectual life in Greece were the times of Pericles a^d Alexander. In Rome, the century of which Augustus was the centre bore the ripest shock of minds. And there are plenty of modern instances, besides the era of the great painters and the age of Shakespeare, to show that the intellectual soil nourishes rich growths and then lies fallow for an interval. But all this is only introductory to the fact that each nation has a literature of a distinct character. The conclusions we should reach from this wide survey are very important. First, society is belted by law. The best definition of Providence is con- stant and beneficent law, and when we see how social statistics fall, as it were, into order and The Laws of Disorder. 71 rhyme; we find that there is the same scientific proof of Providence in society that there is of an organizing and controlling hand in the balanced harmonies of the sky. Some persons have felt reluctance to dwell upon the facts which the sta- tisticians have presented, from the fear that they indorse fatalism, showing that man is a tool and a puppet But they do not add any important weight to the argument for fatalism which logic is able to frame without them. They only show that man has not such freedom of will as to make society perfectly lawless ; they show that the Deity will have some order in society in spite of sin, and that sin itself, as in the case of the regularity of crimes and of criminals at certain ages, will ex- press itself in results by a constant and terrific arithmetic. And so the most important sequence to which our survey points is this : that society is one com- pact, organic, living thing, that the laws of the world treat it as a whole, play with it as though it were a person morally responsible, and appor- tion its punishment or its good exactly in the ratio of its fidelity or its vice. The statistics of crime, ignorance, mortality by pestilence, blight of in- dustry by war, degeneracy of physical power, point back to a certain proportion of evil in the heart of the nation. Does any man say it is a proof of fatalism that there are so many thousands of the perishing classes steadily rising up out of Bos- ton and New York and London, keeping a fixed 72 The Laws of Disorder. percentage every five or ten or twenty years ? It is no more a proof of fatalism than the fact of indi- vidual experience is, that a carousal over night surely breeds a headache in the morning, or that the bite of a viper corrupts the blood and makes the limb swell. The great question is, Can the nation reduce or rid itself of the causes whose results are ciphered out with such permanent con- sistency? Introduce ten per cent more of clown- principle into Boston and Ne\v York, and see how the annals of Broad Street and the Five Points, and the reports of ignorance and crime, will acknowl- edge this new element. The fidelity of society as well as its infidelity will reach the statistician's tables at last. The great lesson of our subject is that we cannot escape law, and also that we can use law. Every community, every state, every empire, is in the coil of moral principles as surely as every man is, as surely as every constellation is played with by the law of gravity with as much certainty and ease as the pebble. Truth works on a large scale just as rigidly as on a small one, and the algebra of social order coldly demon- strates to the legislator and the statesman what the prophet chants in their ears, that wrong prin- ciples, false laws, popular Mammon worship, in- difference to neighborly welfare, are terrible reali- ties, and break out on the body politic in crimes, ignorance, jails, insane asylums, pest-houses, de- moralization, and at last loss of liberty and death. Men are generally and foolishly sceptical as to TJie Laws of Disorder. 73 the certain play of moral causes and the reality of moral laws. They imagine that the intellectual and ethical domain, everything that belongs to the unseen sphere of social character, is a region of chance and accidents, or that what forces work there work helter-skelter, without the possibility of foresight or control. But everything visible in society is the token of invisible essences, and the regularity of statistics only betrays the surety of spiritual as well as material agencies in their obe- dience to law, and thus the possibility of control- ling them. Celtic institutions and statistics differ from the Saxon because the qualities of character differ. Whether the price of grain rise in a com- munity of poorly paid labor, or the opportunities of education be reduced, whether a material or a moral spring be touched, the effect is equally cer- tain and calculable : crime will increase and public suffering will ensue. There is no more uncer- tainty about moral causes than about physical ones. The man who can put up a new school house where one was not may be as sure that he bene- fits his race and abates the percentage of crime as if he could directly alter the character of a town by a word, or erase with his pen some of the statistics of guilt. The statesman of commanding influence who utters a base sentiment in the Sen- ate-House, or publishes it from the Cabinet, may be as sure that he contributes to the disorganiza- tion of his country as if his pen had immediately added to the arithmetic of public disease. The 4 74 The Laws of ^Disorder. laws of moral gravitation and moral chemistry have no more caprice, and may be relied on as serenely, as the forces of the firmament and the crucible. And so we are told with all the precision and coolness of science that, a nation being one living and responsible thing, having its roots in the past and its hopes in the future, its character is the most important element in relation to its strength and permanence. As there is a character housed in every human frame, so there is a character enshrined in every nation, to which its rising gen- erations contribute. Its nobility and greatness depend no more on its prosperity, wealth, and strength than the nobility of a man depends on the size of his body, the acres he owns, and the gold he has at command. A ruffian may have such claims to greatness as these ; and a nation having these, and yet guided by no feelings of honor and love of right, may be only a majestic, rich, and titled savage. It is character that gives nobleness; and only as a nation is pervaded by the moral elements which make up worthy char- acter will its statistics show progress towards permanent power, and history draw its portrait as a benefactor of civilization. Ah ! how impressive and grand does history seem when we think that every country is a mighty pedestal lifting up a national figure symbolic of the character, the prospects, and the perils of the people that dwell on its domain ! The surface of the world, to the imaginative eye, is dotted with The Laws of Disorder. 75 these representative forms. See the genius of old Rome stand on the eminence of an all-shadowy throne, with grim and cruel eyes, and traces of the vices that rotted its sinewy heart. See Egypt on its pyramid, with the massive voluptuousness in its visage, incarnating the scourge and doom of its millions ; Assyria, nodding in sottishness on the high and hasty platform of its power, and dropping its flashy sceptre from bloated and nerveless hands ; Greece, lifting the enervated beauty of its face, as of some shameless and prof- ligate Apollo, from its sculptured eminence over- looking the ^Egean sea ; swarthy Hindostan, lost in sodden reveries over the vast volume of its cos- mogonies ; China, with the swinish cunning of her eyes, showing off, from her broad plateau, the un- tattered robe of her customs ; Arabia, overlooking her deserts with a face ploughed by the passions, long since spent, that once ravaged the civilized world ; decrepit Spain, with the old fire of her romance gleaming out, now and then, over her impoverished and seedy dress ; brilliant France, with sparkling eye, blending into one expression the intellectual vivacity of her Laplaces and Ra- cines, and the volatile, graceful levity of dancing- masters and grisettes ; Italy, lifting from the ancient throne of the Caesars her manacled, delicate hands that once left the Madonna upon canvas, and " rounded Peter's dome " ; Austria, rooted on a pedestal that crushes noble nations, and insulting the sky with the depraved duplicity of her tyranny 76 The Laws of Disorder. and arrogance ; the magnetic North, gazing from her throne of snow, bound about the brows with the grotesque and frosty mythology of Iceland ; dignified and stately England, with haughty brow and stubborn breast and manly mind, wearing a look that interweaves the genius of Newton, Watt, and Shakespeare, but with a heart not softened yet enough towards the chronic miseries of her sub- jects, look at these figures with their various visages and various lessons, and then raise the question to your fancy, In what guise shall the incarnate genius of our own land stand before the centuries, on the structure that represents the lati- tudes from Aroostook to the Golden Coast, and the zones from Lake Superior to the Gulf of Mexico ? Shall her policy and public spirit be such that she shall stand out on that eminence with a shrewd, cold eye, bespeaking idolatrous quest of money, and a robber's avarice for another's land, with a chain in her left hand that fetters three millions of hopeless bondmen, and her right pointing con- tinually to that dark spot in a vast bond which promises to return the fugitive ? There is danger of such a destiny for the soul of our country ; and what a maturity were that for the infant form that was born on Plymouth Rock, baptized to freedom by the cold ocean spray, and cradled in reverence and prayers ! Should she not rather rise on her pedestal among the nations, as a glorious statue with the The Laws of Disorder. 77 unrolled declaration of Independence expressing her steady enthusiasm for liberty, and her interdict of bondage for her unstained soil, a chart that has on it a dotted home and welcome for every wanderer from beyond the sea, and a countenance fresh as the airs of her North, a heart warm as the sunshine of her South, an ambition for good vast as the enterprise of her East, and a hope broad and generous as the prairies of her West ? Is not this the representative character we desire for our blessed land ? He is the statesmen, they are the patriots, who strive to have it realized, and who believe that the laws which defeat disorder and prevent decay are the laws of righteousness and liberty. 1852. III. SOCKATES. THE subject of my discourse is Socrates. Though his name is familiar to human lips as the representative of the highest spirit of duty, yet little is generally known of his life and character. His spiritual physiognomy is not clearly seen amid the cloudy sanctity which en- velops him in the reverential regard of men. It is known or believed that he was a preacher of pure morals, and a man of invincible purity of life, a light walking in darkness, perhaps the clearest light that brightened -the ante-Christian years ; still the man is but feebly perceived by most of those who revere him as an ethical teacher. Socrates was born in Athens in the year 468 B.C., twelve years after the battle of Salamis. His parents were poor, his father an ordinary sculp- tor named Sophroniscus. Nothing more than the common training of an Athenian lad was given to him in early life. This, however, was not all his education. We must not forget that his years fell in the period when the intellect of his countrymen was in the very bloom of its first enthusiasm, and Socrates. 79 rejoiced in the fulness of creative life ; for it was when the tragedies of^Eschylus and Sophocles were frightening and fascinating their first audi- tors, and the chisel of Phidias cut the white rock from Pentelicus as though it were snow, and Peri- cles was fashioning the Athenian will to his pur- poses by his eloquence. Athens, through its arts, was fast becoming a sort of play-ground of Apollo, and Socrates, amid the general worship of beauty, was apprenticed as a sculptor. We know noth- ing of him except that he worked at his profes- sion till he was about thirty-five, when we find that he deliberately threw down his tools, and determined to be the moral schoolmaster of the most intellectual city of the world. Socrates is classed among philosophers ; yet his first movement in the mental world was a pro- test against all that was called philosophy in his time. He had read all that the masters of Gre- cian thought before his day had written, and found it profitless. He found their pages busy with theories about the origin of the world, the way in which it had grown to its present form, and the nature of God. One said the earth came up from a waste of water. Another maintained that every- thing solid is compressed air. A third contended that it is plain enough the globe is an animal, that the stars are its gills through which it takes in and puffs out its breath, while the tides meas- ure the heave and fall of its huge chest. Again it was guessed that mud was the basis of all being, 8o Socrates. which was quickened by the sun's heat to produce plants, animals, and men. Parmenides affirmed that the world is a proportional mixture of light and darkness. Democritus showed that all the differences of form and function were caused by different assortments of the imperceptible atoms of which everything is made ; and Heraclitus asserted that fire is the primal life element, that anything is good in proportion to its dryness. In proportion to a man's goodness his soul became dry. He contended that a dissipated man had a moist soul, so that our popular saying that a drunkard is " a soaker," may be a bowlder from the old Greek philosophy. What was called philosophy in Greece before Socrates was most tedious and fruitless stuff, a continent of speculation and fantastically chang- ing mist-clouds, having no basis, guided by no law, leading to. no result. Socrates saw it, and said so. He marvelled that none of the great thinkers had taken up the question which the soul of man suggests. The great region of in- quiry and interest is not the world of nature, but human nature. What is man here for ? What is the law of happiness ? Where is the path of no- bleness and peace ? What is the foundation of the law of duty ? These themes Socrates did not find treated in the books of the schools, and, at about the maturity of his manhood, he determined to impress upon his countrymen the importance of one sentence, " Know thyself." Socrates. 8 1 And here we are arrested by the fact that Soc- rates was far in advance of our own time as well as of his contemporaries in his conviction that it is better to study our own nature than to be turned from all interest in it by ambition to know the laws of the physical universe. He contended that men could arrive at more certain as well as more val- uable knowledge by studying their own experience and powers than by investigating the world of matter. " It is all guess-work," he said, " these con- clusions about what the earth is made of, and how it was produced. You may speculate about the floor of the firmament, and what the stars are, and how the winds blow, and whether the globe is like a colossal turtle and paddles around the ether, but you cannot know anything about it. But about ourselves we can learn something. We can know what virtue is, where peace may be found, whether there is such a thing as justice, as truth, and whether man was made for a higher walk and destiny than a beaver and a goat." Very few of us really believe that now. Few acknowledge that thoughts are as substantial as things, that a feeling is as real as a paving-stone, that the soul is a congeries of actual forces as truly as the body is, that a moral principle is as persistent and fatal a thing as a chemical agent, and that, in the deeps of the mind and in society, laws are ever at work as constant and stem as those which spin the planets and heave the sea and poise the firmaments. The majority of think' 4* F 82 Socrates. ing men still practically believe that the track of certain knowledge is in the visible and solid world. The stars, the rivers, the rocks, they think afford material of science, but the soul is a region of haze and moonbeams, the law of right is a matter which none of us can be sure about, and conscience a bodiless echo of the passions and desires which cannot safely be relied upon. If this is so, our bones are the noblest part of us, and religion, not being a certainty, is " a mockery and a horror." Its glories are the fancies of a dream, its terrors the figments of a nightmare. Socrates came to the conclusion that it was not so. He felt assured that the mystery in which the world floats is more real than the earth's ribs ; that the stone which his chisel chipped was less substantial than the soul in every human form ; and that the beauty which his cunning carved into the block was less charming and permanent than the beauty of truth, temperance, and holiness, which faith and culture could leave upon the invisible essence of every man. He therefore resolved to abandon the lower for the higher art of sculpture, and instead of being an artist in marble to be a fashioner of men.' From an obscure workman he suddenly became a missionary. We must not think of him as in any technical and stately sense a philosopher. He never wrote a book ; he spent little time in abstract thought ; he was not a student. He was a home-missionary. His interest was in men, their occupation, trials, and character, of instruction and influence was conversation, the street, the shop, the market-place, or the change was his school. He meant to be to his townsmen, as he himself said, " like a gadfly to a strong and sluggish horse," buzzing about him continually, and stinging him from his laziness to a brisk and healthy trot. As he was not a philosopher by occupation and methods, neither was he so in the character of his mind, and still less in his appearance. Take him as a whole, in essence and appearance, Socrates was a compound of mystic, logician, and buffoon. A spirit fellow with the Quakers and Soofes inhabited that grotesque frame. In this respect also he was not a philosopher, but a seer and a saint. He did not spend his time in inves- tigating truth ; he believed it by the assurance of an inward witness ; he saw it and worshipped it. When he left the sculptor's shop he took up his new employment with the consciousness of a heavenly call ; he boasted of a divine commission, and relied on spiritual help. " This duty," said he, " has been enjoined me by the Deity through oracles and dreams, and in every mode by which any Divine decree has ever enjoined anything to man to do." He believed in supernatural influences, in an- swers to prayer, in visions, and in divination. He always insisted that from boyhood he had been conscious of Divine warnings in his own nature, Socrates. a sort of Rochester rappings in his bosom, which he revered, and obeyed without hesitation. They dissuaded him, he said, when a course would be very wrong, but gave no positive counsels. If a youth desired to study under his guidance, if a journey was contemplated, if a thought was about to be expressed, and the inward tick was felj;, he forbade the youth to approach him, he relinquished the journey, he smothered the thought. Some- times he was led to utter prophecies, which his friends say never failed of fulfilment. And yet, unlike other mystics, he was a logician. A man of severer methods never lived. He had a prophet's flaming heart, and he had a brain of ice. He laid gas-pipes as systematically as Cal- vin could for his Quaker light. Nothing could baffle or confuse him. As a contemporary said of him, he could track a principle in all its windings " like a Lyconian hound." He would hold a thought and inspect it as a mineralogist ex- amines a crystal. The symmetry or inconsistency of a thing he w^ould see as quickly and keenly as an artist appreciates the proportions of a statue. He would untwist the elements of a judgment as an expert strips off the layers of mica. Thoughts were things in his grasp. /. Here lies the marvellous originality and power of his genius, that he was a saint in his own con- tact with truth, and a logician in his communica- tion of it to others. He always conversed with men, tried to make them see the importance of Socrates. 85 thinking accurately, linked question to question, till he drew out from his interlocutor his funda- mental faith, or, by the contradictions he led the poor man into, showed that he had no fundamental faith, and then advised him to acquire some prin- ciple of action that he could live by, that would stand the test of argument. He never harangued or grew eloquent, but analyzed, disputed, and dis- cussed, always with the view of getting down to some rocky certainty that would bear the weight of the understanding and afford a substratum for the life. The prophet's heated utterance he dis- carded, but put on the missionary robes to con- vince his fellows that virtue is truth, and that noth- ing else will stand the strain of inquiry and logic. Therefore be sure of the foundation of your life. Know why you live as you do. Be ready to give a reason for it. Do not, in such a matter as life, build on opinion or custom, or what you guess is true. Make it a matter of certainty and science. Do not one hour obey a virtuous impulse, and the next a caprice or a passion. Above all things, make your life consistent. If you know at any time that virtue is highest and true, enthrone it ever after ; follow it in all things. Else your con- duct will be a miserable patchwork and discord. And this was the principle he went by in deal- ing with men and instructing them. All truth is kindred, and so clear thinking is consistent with holiness and leads to it, while inaccurate thinking on any subject is morally dangerous, and an un- 86 Socrates. certainty or falsehood in the intellect might at last be found to be the " apex of hell." Therefore he determined to benefit the Athenians by testing their thought, by making them appreciate the moral truth which they partially believed, and show- ing them that, where the soul has no moral rev- erence and certainty, the life is based on quicksand and marsh. He went into the Athenian streets as an in- quirer after truth. So far from writing anything, or assuming to teach a system of truth, he pre- tended not to know anything, to be a thirsty seeker of the highest knowledge. All that he claimed ability for was to detect nonsense. "I create nothing," said he ; "I am only an accoucheur of the mind. If possible I will assist the birth of opinions in you, and choke them if they look mon- strous, but do not ask me to teach anything di- rectly ; I am a learner, and the humblest of all." Most persons, however, found his ignorance more tough to deal with than the wisest man's knowledge. If he fell in with an atheist, his ques- tions brought the argument from design into such splendid prominence and concentrated strength that we imagine it is Paley's pages we are read- ing, and not a heathen Greek, and the climax is reached in a query like this : " Seeing thou thy- self, Aristodemus, a small and dependent part of the extended earth, art conscious of reason and intelligence, supposest thou there is no intelligence elsewhere in the universe ? " Socrates. 87 If he found a man that did not worship, he began a conversation which rose to such a height that he assented to the conclusion of Socrates : " Piety alone fits, the soul for the communication of Divine secrets ; and no others reach them but those who consult, adore, and obey the Deity." If he met a voluptuary, his logic riddled the V. theory of pleasure, and set in clear relief the folly of tampering with the laws of spiritual health ; with the rich he unveiled the truth that the soul's growth is worth more than the wealth of Croesus and the power of " the great king " ; talking with rulers, the conversation would lead at last to the fact, that to do injustice is worse than to suf- fer it ; and at feast-parties he would contrive to intersperse the fun and laughter with questions or stories about " spiritual love and eternal beauty." It will be clearly seen, as we advance, that the grotesque appearance of Socrates was a symbol of the homeliness and ludicrous cast of his illustra- tions and imagery. Any facts that could be strung upon a moral law, or made to reveal or suggest a re- ligious truth, however common or coarse, he would press into his service. To the mystic insight of Coleridge, and the burly understanding of Dr. Johnson, he joined the shrewd Yankee sense of Franklin. He could draw illustrations for his highest themes from the kitchen as well as from the Iliad and the - religious myths. Skimmers and soup-pans were hieroglyphs of truth and holiness as well as poetic goddesses and fictions of Elysium. 88 Socrates. It is chiefly as a pure religious thinker and a moral teacher that Socrates is known to the majority of persons now, and in the popular im- agination he is conceived as a lofty, dignified personage, with a severe and majestic presence and a bearing solemn to the verge of being tragi- cal. There is, probably, no great character of history from whom an accurate acquaintance chips so clean the mythic burr and halo of gen- eral report. He was truly no saint in appear- ance, and he had no clerical or prophetic method or demeanor, and made no impression upon the beholder of Athenian polish, politeness, or grace. His head was as round as a pumpkin; he was goggle-eyed, and was debtor to nature for that slight cast or inequality of axis known as an in- teresting squint. " Your eyes see only in a direct line," said he, " but I can look not only directly forward but sideways, too, the eyes being seated on a kind of ridge in my head, and starting out." His nose was short, flat, and snub, and the nos- trils were wide and turned up, being more use- ful on that account, as he said, since they were "able to receive smells that come from every part, both above and below." His mouth was wide and his lips thick, which he " thought might be envied by young men, since kisses, with such a liberal application, would, as he contended, be more luscious and sweet." He had a rich way, too, when he had hooked a man in argument, or was saying something rather sly, of holding Socrates. 89 his head still, and turning his eyes among the company, a habit which his contemporaries compared to the way a bull glares around him with his head down. His form would have been more classic and befitting a philosopher, if his neck had not been quite so chunky, and if he had not manifested something above the canoni- cal corpulence of an alderman. The most rigid temperance of diet and rigor of bodily discipline did not avail to reconcile his moral temperament and his physique. He even danced at home in private, with the hope to disenchant his frame of its fleshy encumbrance ; but to little purpose. Nature had determined to intimate in his consti- tution a cross between a Brahmin and a Satyr. The information is preserved for us that he had one pair of dress-shoes that lasted him for life, a story we may well believe, since history has recorded no instance of his wearing them. Winter and summer, his custom was to go bare- footed, and it was, moreover, with a slouching gait and a very seedy dress that the son of So- phroniscus roamed about Athens in his taberna- cle of clay. He has improved a little in respect of dress during the last two thousand years, though his style is still somewhat eccentric, for in some of the spiritual communications with which our times are so favored, Socrates has revealed himself as a tall, middle-aged man, dressed with striped coarse trousers, very loose at the top and tight near the feet, and a kind of frock open in the front and without sleeves. go Socrates. But though he was not a model Greek in out- ward symmetry, he was a perfect athlete in bod- ily vigor and power of endurance. Underneath his dissolute-looking flesh were thews of brass, muscles of oak, and sinews of steel. He inured himself to hardships as a duty, in order to perfect his body as a gift of Providence and an instru- ment of the mind. Sleep he never needed if good conversation was to be had. Report goes, that during the terrible plague of Athens, although he never left the city, he was the only inhabitant that wholly escaped infection. Twice the tough- ness of his frame was proved in the hardships of the camp and the fatigues of battle. When about forty, he was drafted for a winter campaign in Thrace. The army, at one time, was short of provisions, but hunger did n't trouble him. Plenty returned, but he escaped dyspepsia. To- tal abstinence societies had not then been formed, and even philosophers were not expected to be Washingtonians. On one or two occasions, when compelled by good-fellowship to drink with his young comrades, who were very fond of him, so tough was his brain he might have used the words of Lady Macbeth, as he surveyed the re^ suit, " that which hath made them drunk, hath made me bold." To the Athenian frame a Thracian winter would be something like the pleasure which a Carolinian planter would enjoy among a camping party in the Penobscot lumber-lands during January. But Socrates. 9 1 while his companions just ventured from their tents, wrapped carefully, with hair-skins around their legs and fleeced sandals on their feet, they would get a hearty hail from the dialectic corpo- ral, scantily covered with his single threadbare summer robe, and walking barefooted on the ice. It was on the expedition to Potidara, also, that he surprised the camp by standing for twenty-four hours motionless, in a sort of meditative trance. He was as unwelcome a foe to a Thracian boor with his javelin as to an Athenian demagogue with his lasso of logic. In the battle of Potidara he was the most valiant fighter in the troop, and saved the life and weapons of the first young man of Athens by his persistent valor. And after- wards, on the field of Delium, when the ranks were routed, he walked away steadily with the general, perhaps discussing the nature of courage or the mode of life in Hades, as they kept mili- tary step, but, at any rate, with such a " majes- tic composure," as Alcibiades says, who saw him, " that the pursuers concluded to try other game." The comical antithesis of his appearance and his spirit of course made him one of the most interesting objects to the citizens of Athens. He was always " before the people," was passionately attached to his native streets and soil, and even the beauty of nature could rarely tempt him be- yond the walls. " From fields and trees," said he, " I can learn nothing, but I can from the men in 92 Socrates. town." Now and then some young enthusiast could ensnare him to the bank of the Ilissus, with the bait of an oration by Lysias folded in his bosom. " By holding out written speeches before me, you could lead me about all Attica, and wher- ever else you please, as shepherds lead their hun- gry flocks by shaking leaves or fruit before them." And melted by the youth's reading, while they reclined in the shade of the plane-trees and the flowering agnus-castus, their feet dabbling in a fountain that bubbled near, the old man would indulge in some rich and dreamy talk on religious traditions and the beauty of goodness. But his instincts usually kept him to the crooked streets and dingy shops of Athens. He knew, probably, almost every individual of its fourteen thousand free male dwellers, his busi- ness, his prospects, his abilities, his wealth, and habits of life. He considered the city as his par- ish, and could not reconcile it with his conscience that the highest or lowest of his flock should slip the benefits of being catechised occasionally. There were no newspapers in Athens ; but Soc- rates seemed to be a strolling and scattering Lon- don " Punch " among the citizens. Follow in his wake for a day or two, to the walking-grounds in the early morning, into the forum before noon, through little squads of talkers later in the day, and to some party of poets, politicians, and mus- tachioed gallants in the evening, and one will hear the strangest medley of clear-thinking, ac- Socrates. 93 curate statement, sublime principles, queer analo- gies, keen and merciless satire, drollery, eloquence, and witty nonsense, as though the tongue of some crazy genius was bewitched. As to the forms and methods of dealing with his company, he would be as flexible and compliant as a Jesuit, but in his aims he was as serious as Fenelon. At one time he is splitting the seemingly simple propo- sition of some enthusiastic philosopher into its various elements as expertly and smoothly as an adept will tear apart the laminae of a thin plate of mica. In a few minutes he is lashing the licentiousness of a talented man through some gorgeous fable, and cross-questions him about what is most desirable in life, till his victim con- demns himself before a crowd of eager listeners. Some forenoon he may be found in the bridle- cutter's shop that stood near the Athenian forum. The young, rich, and handsome Euthydemus is there with a circle of admiring cronies, a lad who has a fine collection of the poets, and boasts that he will yet govern Athens by his sweet voice and fluent speech. Socrates feels moved to let a little light into his mind upon the qualifications of a statesman. He proposes some meek in- quiries about Athenian history, diplomacy, com- merce, and law, and finds that his knowledge is very shallow. He probes him with some test ques- tions on justice, wisdom, prudence, and law, and- shows that his conceptions are feeble and hazy, and then gravely informs the bystanders that the 94 Socrates- political ambition of the stripling somehow seems to him like the advertisement of a doctor running thus : " It is true, gentlemen, I never thought of making physic my study, and did not even wish to have the reputation of it ; but be so kind as to choose me your physician, and I will soon gain knowledge by making experiments upon you." It is pleasant to know that one more interview like this converted Euthydemus into a friend of Soc- rates and a sober, studious man. One cannot help thinking what a profitable bargain it would be if our own government could have a Socrates every winter at the price of his second-hand toga, soup, and shoes, to dog and drill the experimental politicians of Congress on the avenue or in the lobbies. ' On one occasion a person could hear Socrates reproving the quarrels of brothers, convin- cing them of the beauty of fraternal love by induc- tion, and reconciling them by syllogism. Soon he is convicting a military teacher of ignorance of his profession ; in a little while he is in the studio of Parrhasius, and thence to the shop of Clito, the statuary, drawing out of them, by his corkscrew inquiries, the confession that art is never so well employed as when put to the service of what is noble, modest, virtuous, and amiable. His pleas- antry would show itself in his enigmatical way of introducing or enforcing a lofty proposition. With a mixed company around him, he would quote and urge the line of Hesiod, " Employ thyself in anything rather than be idle." Socrates. 95 Then what delight it gave him to see the group look somewhat sceptical as to its morality, until some captious or very common-sense man asked whether employment in gambling, stealing, and debauchery is better than doing nothing ! How would he define and examine and make the doc- trine blaze before their minds that gambling and all vice were not employment, but the most cor- rupt and infamous idleness ! At a feast, once, where the company were called upon, each by another, to state what they chiefly valued them- selves upon, Socrates rose in his turn and with the greatest gravity said that he valued himself on being a pander and procurer. The guests were astounded, and most of them roared. After- wards he went to show, in no joking way, how earnestly it was his aim to make perfect souls that should be desirable and useful to the state, and to bring together those who should love each other for the best qualities, and be improved by each other's company. 1 What a fine union of sense and fun in his criticism upon a volume of Heraclitus which Euripides loaned him : " That which I understand of it is excellent ; I believe that also to be excellent which I do not under- stand, but it would take a Delian diver to reach the sense." At such parties he might often be heard to preface a tough dialogue with a young man by sallies like this : " My young friend Cal-- lias here went to a noted instructor to learn mne- monics, and succeeded well ; for if he sees a toler- g6 Socrates. ably handsome woman he can never forget her, so perfectly has he learned the art of memory." It does n't need sophists to teach young men that art now. The young gallant might be quite proud of the pleasantry for a moment, but if he had a weak spot in his character let him tremble, for the humorous remark is only a coating of sugar for the stringent medicine that is to follow soon. At times one might find him in friendly chat with a priest of the dominant religion, and when he had warmed and flattered the clerical man sufficiently to the temper of good-fellowship, the modest query might be heard from the lips of Socrates, " Can you tell me what is holy and what impious?" "O, yes," is the patronizing response ; " that which is pleasing to the gods is holy, and what is not pleasing to them is impious." " Admirably answered ; but, my excellent friend, do not the gods quarrel, and is it not said that there are enmities among them, and jealousies one of another, so that what is pleasing to Jupiter would be very uncomfortable to Saturn; and what would make Vulcan clap his hands would make Juno bite her lips with vexation ? " " It is, truly, so said." " So, then, you see, if what is pleasing to the gods be holy, the same thing would be at once holy and unholy, since it is pleasing to some gods and displeasing to others." Here is a dilemma, indeed, but it is at last re- lieved by this new and broader definition that " what all the gods hate is impious, and what Socrates. 97 they all love is holy; but that what some love and others hate is neither or both." " But, my dear Euthyphro," resumes Socrates, " is not that which is loved one thing, and that which loves another ? " " Certainly." " And all the gods love holiness, according to your statement ? " " Yes." " But, since the gods are one thing and holiness another, is holiness holy because they love it, or do they love it because it is holy?" That question should have made every temple shake on the Acropolis. ) Thus does he suggest to the dormant mind of the priest that polytheism is a blunder of induction, that there is something intrinsically and eternally pure and excellent which hangs and flames like a zenith star above the world of spirits, above all theologies and creeds, and be- neath which the mythical Olympus is but a miser- able, dirty ant-hill which the foot may kick into dust A man that could talk thus would, no doubt, be a treasure to the delighted intellectual listeners, but would not be especially welcome to the gen- tleman he felt a divine impulse to enlighten, or hold up spitted upon his barbed dialectics. We may realize his relations to Athens if we fancy some subtle professor of moral philosophy, some acute and tough-brained Father Lamson, some courteous and imperturbable Mr. Brownson, inflamed with the idea that he must improve the Bostonians in clear and proper thinking, and as- sume the mission of reforming loafer about town. 5 G 98 Socrates. And so he happens in upon the broker's board at eleven, with the gracious but astounding saluta- tion, " Well, my friends, suppose we dismiss the topic of ' Sullivan ' bonds, and the 'Old Colony ' stock, and the prospects of the 'Vermont and Massachusetts,' and discourse a while on the chief end of man." At twelve he is disputing pitilessly with a great criminal lawyer, just hurrying to the bar, whether it is kind and friendly to save even a relative from the just punishment of a crime, and holds him by the button till he has impressed on his fancy that there will be no eminent counsel for villains at the last assize, but that every scarred and bloated soul shall be put to the penal discipline that looks to health. At half past one he saunters into the rotunda of the Exchange, and before they know it is exercising a group of merchant princes on the nature of the beautiful - and the true riches of the soul. At two find him at " Parker's," where he draws his chair beside some well-known epicure, and with an air of the most tender interest opens this proposition : " Eat- ing is not a desirable occupation, and not an appetite to be pampered by a wise man. It is merely, you see, the gratification of a want, thus restoring the system to equilibrium. The part of wisdom is to keep as free as possible from the want and the necessity of serving it. The satisfaction of the finest dinner is like the satis- faction of rubbing an itching skin, and a clean soul would as soon aspire after the erysipelas for Socrates. 99 the delight of scratching, as rejoice in a clamor- ous stomach for the sake of smoothing it down with venison and turtle-steak. The temperate man's soul is a sound cask well filled with honey and milk, and giving no trouble to the owner; while the life of the epicure is like a barrel full of shot-holes, which he is compelled to fill con- tinually with liquors that are hard to obtain, or suffer exquisite agony. If you go on in this way, my brother, you will be doomed in Hades to fill a colander by bailing into it with a sieve." At four he is dissecting before a patriot the relations of conscience and the constitution. He drops in to tea with an eminent clergyman, whose brain is laboring with the Sunday sermon, and cools his mental fever by a challenge to prove to him that virtue can be taught, and what is the sanc- tion of duty. Perhaps at eight he is at the museum gauging the moral influence of " Cinder- ella" (and if he finds it bad, let Warren look out for him the next day), and at ten appears, barefoot, unshaved, and self-invited, among a supper-party on Beacon Street, which he entertains by his wit and the ample resources of a disciplined reason till, just before the close, he silences all mirth, and through a most eloquent allegory or myth lets a stream of dazzling radiance upon the point that the only true life is one of rigid temperance, piety, and devotion to the highest duty. And when we add that he extends his parochial visi- tations to every tinman's, carpenter's, and hatter's, ioo Socrates. to every cobbler's shop and bookstore and bakery, to editors' sanctums, to the market-stalls, to the reading-rooms, to oyster-saloons and watch- houses, with his testing questions, and that terrible spiritual proof-glass which brings up before a man's own eyes the very sediment of his soul, we know what Socrates was to Athens, and how he would be welcomed here. But the setting in which Socrates is generally placed by historians of philosophy is in contrast with Grecian sophists. These were a class of in- structors often itinerant in rhetoric, eloquence, gesture, correct use of language, and the general knowledge which would be a good outfit for an Athenian man of the world, and which was essen- tial to polished bearing and practical success. The Athenian lads delighted in talk. Extem- pore fertility of invention, acuteness and supple- ness in debate, apt poetic allusions, sweetness of diction, and happy artifices of arrangement 'were to them like the voice of Jenny Lind to a soft- nerved amateur. It was part of the business of their lives to speak in the assemblies of the people, and no youth might hope to attain eminence in the state unless he could bait the ear or captivate the heads or rule the hearts of the acute, vacillating, and "fierce democracie" by the honey of his phrases, the agile sophistries of his tongue, or the graceful heat and rhythmical intensity of his pas- sion. Any teachers, therefore, who could impart a dialectic or rhetorical skill were sure of busi- Socrates. 101 ness and of enthusiastic welcome in the great Grecian cities. And the chief sophists did not lose any scholars through an excessive modesty of pretension. Nowadays we have printed sophists which tell us, " German made easy " ; " Italian taught in ten short lessons " ; " History crowded into a chart." Then the golden promise was, " Reading, speak- ing, and fluency taught here ; universal science imparted in six free conversations ; philosophers manufactured in five sittings ; orators and archons polished for use at the shortest notice. Price to rich men's sons fifty dollars a lesson." To tell the truth, most of the distinguished sophists made an attractive appearance. They were versed in the general natural science of their time. They were thoroughly acquainted with the great works of the poets. The mnemonic art they had mastered, and could pour out by the hour the great events, and even the driest details, of history. One of them boasted to Socrates that he could repeat fifty proper names after merely reading them once. They composed allegories on the virtues, the gods, and the origin of things, which were at their tongues' ends. Many subtle word-puzzles were stored away in their memory for frequent use. Generally they boasted that there was no theme on which they could not speak melodiously at a moment's warning, and their hearers were challenged to put them to the test At times they would entertain a company with an IO2 Socrates. oration about a bee, and a polished disquisition on so unpromising a topic as salt. The bearing, too, of a prominent travelling sophist was most dignified. He knew how to guard his person with a magic circle of nice proprieties, and to make himself attractive by a most polite reserve. And on important occasions he knew how to dazzle his assembly by his magnificent attire, " his purple robes, embroidered sandals, and fingers sparkling with gold and gems." On such occasions every curve was exactly the line of beauty, every motion artistic, and, whatever the topic, the tropes and metaphors sparkled in the gush of his speech like the brilliant spray from the fountain's throat. The sophists amassed immense sums by their vocation, and one of them is said to have made ten times as much by his profession as Phidias could gain. When one of the most celebrated of these men visited Athens, the young men among the upper-ten were half wild with delight For then, as a few centuries after, it was true that "the Athenians spent their time in nothing else but either to tell or to hear some new thing." The doors of the great stranger's dwelling-place were beseiged before daybreak, and we don't know but that there were crowds in the Bowdoin Squares of Athens to watch his outgoings and return. It was a marked day in the calendar when the lordly sophist had a reception. Socrates would be very likely to pay his respects, wish him the freedom of the city, and offer him a greeting of welcome. Socrates. 103 But his reverence and affection for a sophist were those of a \veasel for a rat. They offended his principles and his practice at every point. They made large pretensions to knowledge; he continually protested that he knew nothing more than the best methods of acquiring knowledge. They taught for gain ; he would take no pay for his instructions. It was often pressed upon him, but never touched. He thought it was as really prostitution to sell wisdom as love for money. In his view education was a serious and arduous matter, and he thoroughly hated any methods which made it seem easy. It was not that the sophists openly taught immoral doctrines that Socrates objected to them, but that they did not teach anything scientifically ; did not ground their pupils on the fundamental principles of certainty. They diverted ambition from a patient and slow mastery of these, turned their scholars from a steady mining for the diamonds of wisdom to a scramble for the spangles of a surface informa- tion. And so, whatever might be their excel- lences, Socrates saw that, in the light of his stern theory of training, the sophists were vitiating the mental principles of the young. Instead of in- spiring a method they imparted a knack. Their aims were wholly practical, and therefore low. He would make men thorough, earnest, and rev- erent thinkers ; they would make them acute debaters, ready tacticians, accomplished orators. They would fit them for eminence in the forums 1 04 Socrates. of Greece ; he would make them wrestlers with ideas in the gymnasium of science. They did not pursue nor inculcate wisdom for its own sake, but only for the sake of one's private interest and political success ; and so in the sight of Soc- rates the sophists had no mental modesty or hu- mility, and were but flaunting courtesans of knowl- edge. It was worth one's while to see a meeting before the best youth of Athens between these ornate professors and the buffoon-prophet, the cool and comic enthusiast, the pug-nosed and chuckle- headed saint. To his fellow-citizens Socrates was a gad-fly, but to them a vampire, sticking with the gripe of a centipede, and sucking the conceit out of them with glee. He was so glad to see the great Protagoras, the sharp-eyed Pro- dicus, the all-accomplished Gorgias, or the cel- ebrated Evenus of Paros ; what a blessing to Athens that they had condescended to come ; now, surely, he could learn about the supreme good, or the essence of wisdom, or the most fitting life, or what the just may be And although he had not a fourpence to pay for instruction, he would beg a little talk in charity. Then how would he prick their brilliant parachutes and let out the gas; how would he rub clown their definitions to sand on the grater of his dialectics ; how nicely would he put his tweezers on the head of a fallacy and " snake " it out of its artistic nest ; how would he inquire and inquire, and tire the brain Socrates. 105 of his courtly antagonist by leading him through the mazes of his own disorderly system \ and split some pompous axiom into a forked con- tradiction before his eyes, and thus teach the by- standers how to think and discuss, and force the baffled professor to exclaim, " I am sure, Socrates, that with five minutes' leisure I could answer you clearly, but just now I am tired and cannot collect my thoughts." But what offended the dainty ears of the soph- ists most was the homeliness of his allusions and figures. He would reduce a general idea to its lowest denomination, and examine it in vulgar fractions. If one of them, in the full sail of dec- lamation, advanced to his auditors the general and somewhat slippery principle that the wise ought to have more in society than the worthless, Socrates would try to get at his precise meaning in this way : " Then you would say, I take it, that the most skilful weaver ought to wear the largest robe and have the most clothes ; that the best cobbler ought to walk the streets in the widest shoes, or with many pairs on his feet ; and that the wisest doctor should be stuffed with the most meats." He got no light on the original proposition of the sophist, but he got the retort : " By the gods, Socrates, you never cease talking about shoemakers, cobblers, fullers, and cooks, as if our discourse was about them ! " Or the learned Hippias agrees to instruct him about beauty, and shows him that " finely shaped 5* 106 Socrates. girls and noble horses and a well-proportioned lyre and golden ornaments and precious stones are beautiful." "But suppose a hard-headed friend asks me if a fine porridge-pot isn't beautiful, and if a sycamore spoon for pea-soup, being more con- venient and fitting, is n't more beautiful than a golden one ; for he might say, too, that if you stir the soup in the tureen with a gold spoon you run the risk of breaking the dish and thus spoil a good dinner, while a wooden spoon, if made of an aromatic tree, would be safer, and would give the soup a better flavor. What must I say if my friend speaks thus, O Hippias ? " " But who would dare use terms so coarse on a subject so noble ? " replied the sophist. "Although such things are fine in their place and when well proportioned, yet their beauty is n't to be spoken of, compared with a fine horse or handsome girl or other splendid things." " Ah, a little patience, good Hippias : if we compare girls with goddesses, does n't the same thing happen as when we com- pare porridge-pots with girls ? And must we for- get what Heraclitus said, that the wisest man will seem only like a monkey, when contemplated in contrast with God, for wisdom, beauty, and all such qualities ? " Thus does he compel the dandy sophist to take off his mental kids and handle rough-looking realities, at the same time forcing him to widen his definition of the beauti- ful, and hinting to him the Divine loveliness which Socrates. 107 infolds all other beauty as the air embosoms the myriad glories of the world. How fine was the simile of Alcibiades at an Athenian feast, to express the nature of Socrates ! " He is," said he, "exactly like those Silenuses that sit in the sculptors' shops, and which are carved holding flutes or pipes, but which, when divided into two, are found to contain the images of the gods His discourses are like them, too ; the phrases and expressions he employs fold around his exterior, as it were, the skin of a rude and wanton Satyr. He is always talking about great market-apes and brass-founders and leather- cutters and skin-dressers, so that any dull and unobservant person might easily laugh at his dis- course. But if ever one should see it opened and get within the sense of his words, he would find that they alone, of all that enters into the mind of man to utter, had a profound and per- suasive meaning, presented innumerable images of every excellence, and were most divine." It is, perhaps, superfluous to say that Socrates was not appreciated at his value by his fellow- citizens. Many despised him because he was poor, ill-dressed, and had no laudable employ- ment. Some of refined taste were repelled by his ludicrous ugliness. Many feared the homely honesty of his talk and the precision of his probe. And not a few saw with alarm that his severe speculations were prying up the foundations of the state polytheism, unsettling faith in the thun- io8 Socrates. ders of Zeus and the trident of Poseidon. The comedians found him rich game. In the " Clouds," a comic play of Aristophanes, brought out when Socrates was forty-five, his house is called the "subtlety-shop," where students are taught the cause of rain and thunder, and exercised in measuring the leap of a flea, the furniture of the house affording ample material for conduct- ing the last experiment, since the couches almost jump of themselves from excess of life. Socrates himself is represented lying flat in meditation on a high shelf, that his mind, as he expresses it, may be hung up above material things, and his subtle soul be mixed with liberal air. Some of the scholars are disposed about the rooms, in the comedy, on their hands and feet, with their noses to the ground, looking like kangaroos on all fours. Socrates is portrayed instructing his pupils in precision of speech, and the take-off of his love of accurate classification is admirable, where the poet represents him as warning his pupils not to confuse realities even so far as to call a male and female turkey by the same name ; but by all means to speak of the male as a turk^r, and the female as a turkey$\r. He promises also, in the play, to instruct any youth how, by proper subtle- ties, to make an unjust cause triumph over the right, an art in which many subtlety-shops in modern times have perfected the visitants.. An old gentleman oppressed with debt and a riotous son, tries to learn the mysterious secret sophistries Socrates. 109 of the thinking-shop, in order to dodge his bills, but finds them too abstruse for his soggy brain, and at last sends the son himself to be a pupil. The youth catches the art of making the worse appear the better reason, but he learns too much, loses his small remnant of filial reverence, and beats his father, soon after he graduates, because he had not good taste in poetry. The old gentleman naturally demurs, but the youth catches him fairly on the logic of the thing, as thus : " Now, here 's^a mild And candid question for you, Pray, did you beat me when a ch^Kl ? 'V " Yes, for the love 1 bore you." J / J^ t > " Then ought not I, toqy toJembrace ^ The shortest means of /provih^v / I - * C My love for you, and beat you, as A' / > ,, This beating 's merely loving ?' 4 / '/* \ *. Children are thrashed j^must f2tHeflp a/ / > Unthrashed and unadmonished ? f } j t \ , You '11 say it is the law, I know, -. \ j For children to be punished. But I '11 reply that an old man * Is in his second childhood, And if he 's thrashed more fiercely than A youth, it can 't be styled odd. Just look how cocks chastise their dads ; Yet wherein do their natures Differ from us Athenian lads, Save that they 're no debaters ? " The play closes with the dismantling of Socrates' house by the enraged old gentleman and his slaves. It is not strange that Socrates should have been made fun of in a farce. But many critics no Socrates. have racked their brains to explain how, if Soc- rates was a lofty teacher, he could be so vilified, his tenets so grossly libelled before his country- men upon the stage. How should he, whose morality was so stern, be scourged as a misera- ble sophist, a sapper and miner of domestic order and filial ties ? How should he, whose delight it was to spear the loose thinkers of his time, be selected as the type of the worst class of them ? It is as if some modern novelist or stage poet should dare to dramatize Dr. Channing inciting a riot, or Deacon Grant and John Augustus entic- ing young men into gambling shops and inviting them to take a social glass. We must make great allowances, however, for the wild license of Athenian comedy. We know that the farce- writers did not care at all for truth in their repre- sentations. Men who could, without impunity, hold up Pericles himself to ridicule, in the sum- mit of his power, would not bridle their fancy about a poor, pale-faced, itinerant disputer of the streets. Besides, Socrates was considered an in- novator on the popular faith. The poet who satirized him was a rigid pagan conservative, and would not have the .basis of a single altar weak- ened or questioned. And who does not know what strange doctrines are associated, by the un- thinking, with the name of every man whose intellect throws off the swaddling-clothes of tradi- tion and creed ? The friends of the pagan order knew that Socrates dealt with abstractions; and Socrates. in so they called him a trifler, not inquiring into the quality of the abstractions. It was enough that he was 'a philosopher ; and they believed that every kind of philosophy tended to poison ancient morals and cripple the ancient faith. Blind con- servatives never stop to make accurate classifica- tions of their opponents. They make no account of the various moods and spirit in which dissent is made, and the frequent affirmations that accom- pany denials. One man's denial is a yes he says to something better which he loves ; another's is merely a no to something which cramps his intel- lect, and restrains his will, and which he hates. But the conservatives divide mankind into two parties, the friends of establishments and the malcontents. There are besiegers at the gates, and the garrison of the fortress call them all foes, not caring to ask who are seeking to enter in order to repair and enlarge the old, dilapidated castle, and to distinguish them from the mob who would batter down the turrets for the sake of sack and murder. Consider what a motley crowd are lumped together to be laughed at under the title " Transcendentalists " ; men without faith and men of the deepest faith, conceited shallow- pates and lynx-eyed seers, nebulous poets and genius with its pen of adamant and tongue of gold, flaccid pantheists and those whose loyal lives adorn the eternal laws, are hooped about and bundled into fellowship by that elastic word. Shall a Catholic bishop .stop to analyze and 112 Socrates. parcel out the various grades of minds included in that category, when they can be conveniently anathematized in the gross ? Is not the term "neologist" in theology made to span the space between a Fox and a Mar- tineau, a De Wette and a Strauss ? Does not the title " Socialist" cover with equal reproach the Christian whose imagination revels in the pictured fulfilment of the prayer, " Thy kingdom come," and the Red Republican whose heart is fierce with hate, and the sensual enthusiast, like Henri Heine, who would lift from the race the restraint of principle and the " incubus of worship," and build the temple of license on the ruins of the home? Let a man be heard to question the literal inspiration of "Chronicles," or to speak of the fragmentary nature of the Gospels, or to hint of any mistakes of the Apostles, and is he not called infidel and a foe of Christ ? Socrates was called to pay the inevitable price of dissent and of a higher insight, by a total misconception of his views. The ultra-conservatives of Athens feared that the state would fall if the throne of Zeus was undermined, and that virtue would have no backer if the flames of Tartarus were treated to the wet blankets of dialectics. They could not see, and cared not to see, that the no of Soc- rates to the traditions was a higher religious yes. They would not look at the infinite sweep of Providence which, in his teachings, displaced the Socrates. 113 sceptre of the thunder-god. They could not dis- cern that native "beauty of holiness " which, in his sight, was the only thing in the universe to be desired. They could not comprehend the terrors of that intrinsic spiritual retribution for sin which he would substitute for the red surges of Phlege- thon, and so the shortest way was to oppose and satirize him as an atheist and a mental libertine. To these causes of dissatisfaction we must add the hostility of most of the demagogues, and even of the statesmen, of Athens. He believed in the application of science to public affairs as well as to speculative questions. He believed that those only had the right to govern who knew how to govern. "The sceptre," said he, "cannot make a king, and none are rulers who are ignorant of the art of government." The whole of Mr. Carlyle's famous doctrine on this point, in his " Latter-day Pamphlets," is found in Socrates' conversations. He was fond of picturing the qualities that are essential to successful statesmanship ; and in this way was holding up an ideal in the workshops and before the youth of Athens, which threw too much light upon politics for the comfort of the politicians. Once he did appear on the stage as a practical dealer in public business. He was more than sixty years old. Some victorious navy-generals were on trial for their life upon the charge of neglecting to save some of the sailors of their own fleet whose ships had been sunk in the 1 14 Socrates. engagement. The Athenian voters were exas- perated against them. A motion was made in the assembly of the people, a general concourse in their Faneuil Hall, to take summary action upon the case of the generals without a special trial. It was plainly illegal, a proceeding of Judge Lynch, and the magistrates declared it so, and hesitated to put the motion. Amid great excitement another motion was made, " that who- ever interrupted the free votes of the assembly should be involved in the same sentence with the commanders." A tumultuous shout greeted the proposition, but the presidents still refused. A demagogue arose and formally accused them, and the multitude demanded with clamors that they be called to account. It was no boy's play, this bearding the Athenian panther when his eyes were kindling, his claws starting from their cush- ions, and he had begun to growl. Socrates was by law the chief magistrate of the day. The rest of the board faltered before the fury of the populace; but the hard-headed old philosopher would not budge an inch. The leading men tried to terrify him, the voters threatened to impeach him, there was a tempest about him ; but he said that every action is open to a higher and searching inspection, and he insisted that he would not do an act which was contrary to law. The generals were condemned, but Socrates somehow escaped being mobbed, and lived to see the instigators of the affair impeached, imprisoned, and despised. Socrates. 1 1 5 We cannot be certain to which law, the human or the higher statute, Socrates referred, when he said he would do nothing contrary to it. For, a year or two afterwards, the ruling oligarchy sum- moned him to the marshal's office, and ordered him to go with four others and seize a man named Leon, of Salamis, a fugitive. We do not know the crime of Leon, and cannot positively tell whether he was white or black. But Socrates thought he was entitled to his liberty, and was not attracted to kidnapping, for these are his words : " That government, strong as it was, did not so overawe me as to make me commit an unjust action ; but when we came out from the public office the four went to Salamis and brought back Leon, but I went away home ; and perhaps for this I should have been put to death, if that government had not speedily been broken up." A picture of Socrates would be very incom- plete that did not include a sketch of his do- mestic relations. He was a great admirer of human beauty, and there are many passages of his conversations that betray a noble and gen- erous estimate of the nature of woman. He was above the prejudices of his age, and judged human beings by qualities of soul, and not by sex. Perhaps if now among us his voice would have been heard at the Worcester Women's Rights Convention ; for he said publicly at a supper- party in Athens, what was a heresy in Greece, " I have long held the opinion that the female sex n6 Socrates. are nothing inferior to ours, excepting only in strength of body and perhaps steadiness of judg- ment." And Xenophon, who was his devoted friend, in a fictitious dialogue puts into his mouth the words, which show his estimate of female character, " It is far more delightful to hear the virtue of a good woman described, than if the famous painter Zeuxis was to show me the por- trait of the fairest woman in the world." It has been well remarked by another, as a singular fact, that " the majority of those men, who, from Homer downwards, have done most to exalt woman into a divinity, have either been bachelors or unfortunate husbands." There is no disputing the fact that Xantippe, the wife of Soc- rates, was a tartar, or, as Aristophanes would say, a tartaress. She tried the temper of the sage in every way. She railed at him and stormed against him ; she disturbed his meditations with the mop ; she doused him with dirty water (clean water, it is said, would not always have been a misfortune) ; she trampled presents that were sent to him un- der her feet ; she knocked the tables over when he expected a philosophical friend to a frugal supper ; she tore off her husband's cloak in the middle of the street, which, as it was probably his only gar- ment, must have been annoying. The children complained bitterly about her, and declared to the old gentleman that her tongue was worse than the claws of a wild beast. But the sage was never ruffled. The visitations of dirty water, he Socrates. 117 said, were the rain that followed the thunder of his good wife's tongue. He exercised the boys in dialectics, and proved that they ought to ask par- don of the gods for their impiety, and all his own perils he tried to turn to moral benefit. "If you think so highly of female nature," said a captious friend to him, " how comes it you do not instruct Xantippe, who is, beyond dispute, the most insupportable woman that is, has been, or ever will be ? " Pretty plain talk to a man's face about his wife. " But, my friend," said Soc- rates, " those who would learn horsemanship do not choose tame horses, but the highest-mettled and hardest-mouthed. I design to converse with all sorts of people, and I believed I should find nothing to disturb me in their conversation or manners, being once accustomed to bear the un- happy tongue of Xantippe." So, in early church history, we read of a Chris- tian lady who desired of St. Athanasius to pro- cure for her, out of the widows fed from the ecclesiastical fund, an old woman, morose, peev- ish, and impatient, that she might, by the society of so ungentle a person, have often occasion to exercise her patience, her forgiveness, and charity. That Socrates showed great genius in selecting the toughest trial possible to the soul of man, and that he breasted it heroically, is beyond question ; yet there is something to be said for the much berated wife. What was Socrates as a husband ? 1 1 8 Socrates. He was so poor, by his own confession, that he was never master of all the proper implements of housekeeping. All the property under his roof would not have brought forty dollars at auc- tion. He would not take pay for his teachings, but his teachings could not purchase fire-wood, and he would not do any other work. All the morning he would have a glorious philosophical lounge in Simon the leather-dresser's shop, and then go home to dinner, forgetting that Xantippe had not been furnished with a sixpence to trade with the fishman at the door. Husbands may be transcendental, but wives who must cook and bake have a curious way of looking upon life from the point of material interests. Socrates was always talking about how little a man could live on, but he did not earn that little. He was delighted that poor men in Athens could buy four measures of flour for an obolus ; but where, O Socrates, is your obolus ? His soul was revelling, no doubt, in the great ideas, and pointing out the everlasting distinction between the agreeable and the just \ but his wife, all this while, was living among the empty stewpans and rickety chairs, and meditating how a good dinner would be both agreeable and just, and feeling the everlasting and infinite distinction between mutton and hunger, penury and household comfort, dependence on charity and an honest livelihood. Socrates was thinking over the benefits society derives from virtue and good teachers, while she mused on the Socrates. 119 greater ease with which the little Soccies could be clothed if the sage would stick to chiselling statues instead of sculpturing souls. Moreover, if the good woman ever discovered the motive of the sage in marrying her, can we blame her if she determined to assist his moral development by exercising her peculiar genius to the top of its bent ? It was a Divine call, I know, that made Socrates a bad provider for his family. He would, perhaps, have violated the highest principle, and been a worse provider for the world, if he had fulfilled the ordinary obligations, and worked to have his parlor furnished and the larder stocked. But we must also remember that, to have domestic tranquillity in his circumstances, he should have had a female Socrates for a wife, and that only supernatural grace could have kept any ordinary woman from being a termagant and trial. The family of Socrates was the circle of his friends. To understand him, we must compre- hend his influence over persons, persons of great genius and of the most diverse temperaments, tastes, and gifts. There have been few such im- mense and tyrannical personalities known. The men whom he confuted in debate called him a cramp-fish that benumbed the wits of his oppo- nents. And he attracted as powerfully as he paralyzed. Among those who valued him as the apple of their eye, and revered him as almost more than mortal, were some of the greatest names of Athens. The wealthy Crito was his 1 20 Socrates. steady adherent from boyhood till death, and would have rejoiced to turn his purse upside down for him, if Socrates would have permitted such a profanation of attachment. The acute and vigorous Antisthenes, founder of the sect of Cynics, was early captivated by him, and walked from his home six miles every day and back again to hear him talk. He despised all luxuries and show, and, though able to dress better, wore a threadbare cloak and ragged clothes. Socrates was the only being on earth he loved, but friend- ship did not save him from the remark, " Why so ostentatious ? Through your rags I see your vanity." With equal ardor the luxurious, oily-tempered, polished sensualist, Aristippus, was devoted to him, a man who realized perfectly the formula that has been given for Goethe's nature, that "he succeeded in subjecting all irregular impulses to a course of disciplined self-indulgence." Mihi res, non me rebus subjungere. The society of Socrates was as indispensable to him as lazy leisure, wine, and bodily indulgence. But the terms of the in- tercourse reflect no dishonor on Socrates himself. He contested inch by inch with him the theory of pleasure, and forced him to confess before others its nonsense and inconsistency. The virtuous and simple-hearted Xenophon was his pupil, and, as a child to him more than twenty years, believed him to be inspired, and wrote out his recollections of him to vindicate his char- acter. Socrates. 1 2 1 Euripides, " the stage philosopher," though older, was for some time his intimate compan- ion. The insolent and subtle Euclid of Megara, afterwards founder of a sect, was a constant sat- ellite. So necessary was the society of Socrates to him, that when his native city was at war with Athens, and a decree forbade any dweller in Megara on pain of death to be seen in the Athe- nian streets, Euclid dressed in female attire and walked twenty miles by night to the house of Soc- rates, to have a few hours' talk. And a host of others Cebes and Simmias, who left their native country for his sake ; Phce- don of Elis, once a slave in Athens, but redeemed by Socrates' influence, who repaid the favor by the growth of his mind and his ardent affection ; the beautiful Channides ; the young Aristides, who said he gained strength by being in the room with Socrates ; Aristodemus, Apollodorus, Critobulus testified to the personal sway of the slouchy ambassador of reason. The two sides of Socrates' nature were repre- sented in his friends. He had his Boswell always near him, who consulted oracles about him, and was continually in a quarrel with somebody in regard to him, and who hardly dared to pronounce his name aloud, the little, dark, shrivelled, dirty, fussy Chaeropho, whom the comic poets delighted to hit off under the nickname of " Socrates' bat." And there was ^Eschines, son of a sausage- 122 Socrates. maker, who took a notion for the linked thought rather than the linked meats, a poor and un- thrifty fellow, whom Socrates once advised in his distress to borrow money of himself by reducing his wants. After the death of his master he failed in the perfume business, and took to pub- lishing Socratic dialogues for a living. Two characters, however, appear in the circle of his associates who eclipse all these. The first was Alcibiades, a man v, ho in his character united the distinguishing traits of Lord Peterborough, King Charles II., and Voltaire. He bore the most aristocratic blood of Athens. His wealth was enormous, and his face the handsomest in Greece. He began responsible life at eighteen, with a nat- ural temper which education could scarcely tame, and amid circumstance that would peril not only the finest disposition but the firmest principles. He was proud, chivalrous, and munificent. He had a passion for all games, cock-fights, and horse- races, and an equally intense delight in literature. He kept the most costly stud and chariots, carried pet quails in his bosom, and owned a most valu- able dog, whose tail he cut off close, that Athens might talk about it, and so not talk of worse things. He was self-confident, lawless, and dissolute, and indulged the wildest caprices of temper. The people petted him as one would pet a complacent lion's whelp. The women, of course, all loved him. He struck a schoolmaster who did not happen Socrates. 123 to have a copy of Homer in his house. He struck one of the worthiest citizens of Athens on a wager, and the next day went and stripped himself before him, begging to be beaten for the insult. He openly destroyed the public record of a charge against one of his friends. He carried his wife by force away from the magistrate to whom she was applying for a divorce. He would reel drunk, late in the evening, into supper-parties, where he was invited, or would stand at the door while his slaves went in and stole the goblets from the table, which he would coolly give away as chanty to the poor. He shocked all Athens by breaking the sacred busts of Mercury in the streets in a night scrape. The Mysteries were caricatured in his house ; and a comic poet who dared to spear him on the stage disappeared suddenly by mak- ing, as was supposed, an unexpected midnight acquaintance with the sea. The dates of all these excesses are not known ; but it is certain that at one time he was devot- edly attached to Socrates, and was beloved by him. They walked together, wrestled with each other, occupied and slept in the same tent in the camp. He went to learn the art of accurate thought and speech, he learned more. The philosopher talked with him on his danger and duties, made him cry over his follies, and drew from him the confession that such society seemed to be a heavenly provision for his redemption. " When I hear him," he is reported to have said, 124 Socrates, 11 my heart leaps up far more than the hearts of those who celebrate the Corybantic mysteries. He alone inspires me with remorse and awe. I stop my ears, therefore, as from the sirens, and flee away as fast as possible, that I may not sit down beside him and grow old listening to his talk." Better for him if he had thus listened ; for then he would not in his checkered fortune have typified the history of all lawless ambition and dissolute license \ he would not have had the mortification of failing to reach what he aspired after ; he would have been saved the disgrace of injuring his country almost fatally; he would not have died in banishment and shame, and by the arrows of midnight assassins. If we may credit a story of Apuleius, Socrates once had a remarkable dream, in which he seemed to see a swan fly from a sacred altar in the Acad- emy to his breast, which afterwards extended its wings towards the heavens and allured the ears of men and gods by its harmonious voice. While he was relating the dream, Aristo brought in his son, a finely shaped and handsome youth, to be a pupil. As soon as Socrates saw him, and knew, by his outward form, what his mind was, he ex- claimed, " This, O friend, was the swan I saw." Socrates might well have had such a dream, for it was the boy Plato that came to him ; and if no other record remained to us of his greatness than the bent he gave and the spirit he breathed into the genius of Plato, his fame would be secure. Socrates. 125 Ex ungue leonem. The indication would be as certain as that the discovery of an original and huge footstep in one alabaster slab would give a new mammoth to the lists of zoology, or that the finding of a majestic and faultless statue among the ruins of Etruria would furnish Phidias a mate in the realm of art From twenty to thirty Plato was in the society of Socrates, then passing from his sixtieth to his seventieth year. He was gently turned by Socrates from politics and pleas- ure and a frivolous Athenian ambition to a life of study and thought. What the sage could not do for Alcibiades he did for Plato. Never was the service of education acknowledged with more ardent gratitude, never was it repaid with such delicate reverence. The lapse of fifty years, which made Plato the hater and bitter satirist of almost every prominent man and institution of society, did not weaken his memory and love of his master. He clung to him in thought as the one true, solid, and symmetrical man amid a crowd of phantasms, traitors, and dwarfs. Plato wrote no eulogy of Socrates, but wherever he has gone into the palaces of the aristocracy of letters, with his courtly mien and purple drapery, he has intro- duced his old slouchy, unshod master, as if say- ing, with elegant haughtiness, " If you would be honored with my company, make him also wel- come who has made me what I am." His greatest works are cast in dialogues, in which the writer himself never appears, but where Socrates is the 126 Socrates. chief speaker and hero, as though the highest thoughts would be profaned in coming through other lips ; and thus, arm in arm, the stately duke and the democrat of philosophy walked down the lists of fame. That sweet and mystic swan-song, the liquid fusion of poetry and science, with which the genius of Plato has filled the cloisters and ora- tories of the chief scholars of our race, has em- broidered forever the name of the chaste and monastical Silenus with the melodious chants to " the first pure, first holy, and first fair." From this point, where his greatest personal influence is visible, it will perhaps be most fitting to review the career and sum up the qualities of Socrates. It is plain enough that he was one of the men whose office it is to give a fresh intellec- tual impulse by shedding the light of new methods, and whose work, like that of Bacon and Des- cartes, is seen in the new products of thought that spring from the soil which they had ploughed. Milton has finely expressed his mission thus : " Philosophy From heaven descended to the low-rooft house Of Socrates : see there his tenement Whom well inspired the oracle pronounced Wisest of men ; from whose mouth issued forth Mellifluous streams that watered all the schools Of Academics old and new, with those Surnamed Peripatetics, and the sect Epicurean and the stoic severe." Had we time for it, it would be pleasant and profitable to follow his influence upon the fortunes Socrates. 127 of philosophy in Greece. He was the father of a new method of study. ' His thoughts were the seed-corn of systems. His pupils were the teachers of centuries. The great works of the leading names in ancient speculation were slips from the mind of Socrates. Each bump of his brain was the nucleus of a philosophical school. He held in his large reconciling intellect princi- ples which separated when less massive thinkers tried to handle them, and were developed by rival parties as hostile elements. For a thousand years he held sway over the processes of the human mind ; and ancient heathen literature, when it sought an example of a noble self-sacrificing life of thought, spontaneously sought an illustration in some act or saying of Socrates. His life is the dividing-point between the barren and the healthy periods of Grecian phi- losophy. His mind, so capacious and healthy, could be split up into various schools. Hardly had he left the world, than the strong and simple light he shed was scattered in various hues by the prismatic minds that had surrounded him or that succeeded him ; but in almost every case, as happens when the strands of the solar beam are brilliantly dishevelled, the vivifying principle, the actinic ray, was lost. The Cynic system was an exaggeration of the personal habits of Socrates, his poverty, tem- perance, and contempt of wealth erected into a theory, but devoid of that absorbing reverence 128 Socrates. for the right which made him forget the eccen- tricity of his habits in the joy of his higher loyalty. The Cynic intruded his tub and his dirt upon the notice of the passer, as if to say, " See my estimate of higher things by my comfortless indecency." Socrates showed an adoration for the supreme things that was genial, and tried to make others recognize their beauty and worth; he did not boast of his penury and cheerless home, but silently paid that price for the privilege of leisure to revel in his mission. The hair-splitting Megarian school was a caricature of his merciless dialectics, lacking the buttress of his Franklin-like common- sense to save it from caving into the abyss of abstract and fathomless foolishness. The Cyre- naic theory was a Silenic parody on his principle that happiness is the aim of man, and that every soul should make circumstances subject to its own control. It was like abusing the principle, "sufficient unto the day is the evil thereof/' into a warrant for intemperance and a free commission to live as a Sadducee. Indeed, we are not to suppose that his poverty and the contempt of so many of his fellow-citizens were at all delightful to him. He felt his isola- tion. Xenophon, in a fictitious dialogue, makes Socrates say in reply to a man who begged him to correct any errors the sage might see in him : " How can I correct you when you are already possessed of the character of a good and honest man ? and especially when I am taken for the Socrates. 1 29 greatest trifler, who employs himself in nothing but measuring the air ? or, which is a far worse character, that I am a poor man, which is a token of the greatest folly ? This, indeed, might have been a trouble to me, if I had not met the other day a horse belonging to Nicias, with a crowd of people about him admiring his good qualities, and talking abundance in praise of his strength and spirit. This made me ask the question of the master of the horse, whether his horse was very rich ? But he stared upon me, and laughed at me, as if I had been a madman, and only gave me this short answer, How should a horse have any money ? When I heard this, I went away contented that it was lawful for a poor horse to be good on account of his free and generous spirit; and therefore I conclude it is likewise possible for a poor man to be good." * This must be derived from a real saying of Socrates, for it does not seem possible that Xen- ophon could have had wit enough to invent its quaintness and pervade it so delicately with such sweet, pathetic humor. The Platonic methods and speculations were the rigorous application of his mental principles and the coloring of his more practical and homely ideal faiths with the purple and gold of a gorgeous fancy. Stoicism was the apotheosis of his moral hardihood and self-poise, while the Aristotelian ambition to scour the kingdom of nature and * Xen. Good Husbandry, 663. 6* I 1 30 Socrates. label all the parcelled facts of the universe caught its impulse from his delight in the homeliest details which indicated or enforced a law, and his strenu- ous attempts after accurate classification. Nothing is more singular in the history of philosophy than the fact that a man so endowed with the analytic faculty should have guarded it religiously from roaming and rioting in unwholesome fields, and wasting itself in curious speculative exercises, or grubbing in miserable researches for the sanction of our primitive faiths, but should have devoted it to the work of elucidating moral truth, and made it steadily subservient to practical ends. And here the singular dualism of his nature attracts attention. A radical distinction between men is often indicated by saying that some are intuitive and others logical in their processes of reaching truth. " The Arabs speak of a confer- ence between a mystic and a philosopher. On parting, the philosopher said, ' All that he sees I know,' and the mystic said, ' All that he knows I see.' " Socrates was a seer and a knower. By his dreams, trances, and abstractions, his inward suggestions and Divine call, he is fellow with the Brahmins and Soofees, George Fox, Bcehmen, and Swedenborg. By his scientific methods and pry- ing scrutinies and impatience of inaccurate state- ment he belongs to the thinkers and provers, and stands in close affinity with the Aristotles, Bacons, Hamiltons, Herschels, and Stuart Mills. He was a man of faith, and he insisted on knowledge. Socrates. 131 He meditated logically. No prophet ever felt more thrillingly the supreme worth of virtue and the holy; but he discarded the prophet's heat of utterance, and put on the missionary robes to convince his fellows by earnest conversation that virtue is truth, that there is no such dread- ful thing as the insult men offer truth by not founding their behavior on it, and that what can- not be proved is certainly too dangerous to be lived. His soul was doubly furnished, for it had strong wings and sturdy feet. With Plotinus he could take " the flight of the alone to the alone," and he could travel with any pedestrian rationalist and climb with him all day the rugged steeps of in- duction, and make no misstep in gaining the peak where the lower landscape is comprehensively surveyed. This dualism is manifested in him at every point. We cannot sufficiently admire the fine proportions of his intellect, its majestic, planet- like poise. Mysticism never betrayed him into fanaticism, nor obscured by its luminous diffusive haze the clear boundaries between demonstrative and speculative truth. He would revel in volatile abstractions and practical details with equal de- light. Let him get pitted against some subtle head from abroad, and he would never tire of lead- ing or following for hours through all the intrica- cies of speculation about the relations of courage, temperance, knowledge, and piety ; and when his 132 Socrates. poor opponent's brain was completely fagged out, Socrates would take him to the best and cheapest cobbler's stall, show him the miller's establish- ment where a poor man could buy a large quan- tity of fine flour for a penny, walk with him to the oil-man's where a chcenex of olives cost two farthings, and then hasten to the slop-shop where a jerkin without sleeves could be had for ten drachmas ; and from these facts the foreigner, who had seen him untwist the constitution of knowledge, listened to a discourse on the fe- licity of Athens. Socrates was a transcendental Cobden. He was a cool and comic enthusiast. He was a compromise of Pythagoras and Punch. He trod the mother earth with bare feet, and stared into the spiritual universe with his lobster eyes. Some religious men regard sin chiefly in the light of God's mercy, and see it as the deepest and blackest ingratitude; others conceive it in contrast with Divine Sovereignty, and regard it as deliber- ate rebellion ; others are absorbed with the feeling of the immense wrong it does the soul, like the scorching of a nerve by flame, and dwell on its intrinsic evil; others, again, forecast by their imagi- nation the terrible results it is storing up, and tremble before the glare of the future circumstan- tial hells into which it will one day slide the spirit. But Socrates saw chiefly the intense and towering nonsense of sin. Evil-doing of every sort is hos- tile to nature, and is therefore idiocy. All hope Socrates. 133 of gaining anything by it is like the expectation of bending the law of gravity from its customs for private advantage, or wrestling with the electric stream. No Gentile intellect has ever seen more clearly the leading vital laws. And what he saw he worshipped. A law once seen was as a gos- pel. He asked no other sanction for a principle than that it is a reality. The ordinary method with men is to ask, not whether a principle is true, but " What if we do not follow it ? " " What ad- vantage is there in acceptance and obedience? What jails, dungeons, stocks, and whipping-posts lie behind the statute, and enforce it with an elo- quence which our nerves and self-interest can appreciate?" But Socrates did not slyly gauge the police force, nor count the sheriffs, which a law could muster before he concluded to be loyal. If Nature indicated that a clean tongue was proper, no pepper and artistic cookery went into his stomach. If she said that a firm muscle lay in her order, a bed of lamb's-wool would not be soft to him, and luxury was despicable. If Nature hinted the supremacy of justice and the good, all glory, material magnificence, pomp, wealth, and power were as nothing but playthings, and not to be accepted if they could not follow the path of entire consecration to what is best. Virtue in his view was truth, and vice practical nonsense ; and since, in his belief, the parts of truth must be harmonious, he maintained that all clear and correct thinking is consistent with holi- 1 34 Socrates. ness and leads to it, while every dark spot of con- fusion or uncertainty in the intellect might turn out to be the " apex of hell." Hence the earnest- ness with which he insisted on accurate thinking ; hence, too, his aversion to positive magisterial instruction. All truths are kindred, and truth enough he believed lay in every soul to save it, qr at least to condemn its impurity, if the mind could be made to appreciate it. Consistency was his watchword and his sanative for the sin in the world. Whatever is worth considering is worth knowing thoroughly, and if any fundamental point is known scientifically all needed practical knowl- edge will come. " Enthrone," said he to men, " what you occasionally recognize as supreme. Do not make your conduct a practical falsehood. Be con- sistent. Give me one fundamental element of your belief, and if it is real I will get a purchase on it for my lever that will wrench your false soul out of joint ; if it is unreal I will show you how your character is, or soon will be, as soft as mush." Thus .he held up realities, preached intellectual morality, and belabored every unfaithful man with his own admissions. There was no invective in his private sermons. The terribleness of his method was its calmness and scientific coldness. By his leisurely conversations he made men judge themselves, brought the most hardened men up by the strain of his logic to see that their careers were founded on falsehood as deliberately and as surely as a bull is drawn by a windlass to the Socrates. 135 slaughter-house. " If you will live stupidly, like sots, it shall not be my fault I will make you ashamed of it at least. You shall know that you are ninnies, and if the weapon I am commissioned to wield does not reach your heart it shall not be because it does not spike your intellect, strike down through and through your brain." It was not his forte or aim to frighten people or to reach their affections, but to convince and con- vict ; and when, as in the case of Alcibiades, he did stir the feelings, it was probably by the suc- tion-pump of his logic that he moved the fountain of tears. We cannot estimate too highly the un feverish- ness of soul exhibited by Socrates. It is better to be fanactical in the cause of righteousness than to freeze in self-love. But nothing is so grand and majestic in the universe as the sustained, healthy, and vigorous conviction in a strong na- ture that nothing is good or worth living for but what is holy. The play of Socrates' moral life, though so stern and uncompromising, was not forced or hard. As Montaigne finely said, " He made his soul move a natural and common mo- tion, and raised himself, not by starts but by com- plexion, to the highest pitch of vigor." It is com- paratively easy to pay the respect of being solemn and sad before the Infinite Justice and Goodness, but to see them steadily and be cheerful is a deeper worship. It is common to acknowledge them as law and adore them, but it is only by the 1 36 Socrates. rarest spirits that they are seen as life and accepted as the soul's treasure and joy. Socrates did not feel that a man should lie in the embrace of the spiritual laws as on a bed of bull-briers, but that the soul should feel secure, protected, and at home in them, as if cushioned in a nest of down. And he was able to make practical religious themes subjects of easy and honest conversation. We imagine that they are for set, stately, or heated address, for preaching, not for talk. Generally, if the purest saintly man starts such topics with a friend, alone or in the house, the ledger is closed, or the book is shut ; the wife stops knitting ; the children sit stiff, and the soul takes a prim and rigid posture. There is no communion ; the tones of the speaker have no fresh inflections; the dialect spoken is not that of the poem, the ex- change, and the press, but the language has a musty, sepulchral smell. Socrates, however, talked with men about these things as a physician con- verses on symptoms and prescriptions, the un- healthly diet that has been indulged, and what the patient must do to regain vigor. Begin to talk with him on painting or housekeeping, wrest- ling, rhetoric, or poetry, and soon you are on the smooth and pleasant slope that slides you so gracefully into the depths of moral life. The tones are calm, the illustrations clear, various, and lively, and the talker finds that the law of duty is as entertaining a theme as the law of symmetry, and needs no more take the lustre from the eye Socrates. 137 than a discourse of botany or music. The in- tense earnestness of Socrates was lubricated and made genial by his humor. His life was as loyal as the still tidal currents of the seas, and the upper waves might frolic and foam without detri- ment to his health or to the spiritual landscape of the world. We might speak here, too, at some length of his love of men. He worshipped truth and right, and he loved men because of their capacity to know and serve what is best in the universe. The greatness and priceless worth of a soul was his frequent theme. Never was there a sterner spir- itual republican. Titles and place were dim to his eye before the faculty of comprehending the just and living for what is good. This faculty he saw in the artisan as in the blood aristocrat, the wealthy merchant, and the lordly sophist. His missionary sincerity and love of men were seen in this, that discussion with a cook or a slave in Athens was as delightful to him, if it was honest and earnest, and could lift the mind an inch above its ordinary plane, as banquet disquisitions and con- ference with the greatest men of Greece. Simon the bridle-cutter published a set of conversa- tions held by Socrates in his shop with the stray visitants, of all degrees of social standing, that happened in. Such is a slight sketch of the mental qualities of a man who seemed to be a compound of Wilkes, Franklin, Johnson, and Coleridge. He had the ludicrous homeliness 138 Socrates. and entertaining wit of the first, the shrewd sense and practical wisdom of the second, the burly understanding, social royalty, and conversational methods and resources of the third, and the ana- lytic subtlety, entrancing eloquence, and mystical insight of the last. We come now to the closing experiences of his career. The people began to tire of him, and to fear him, towards the close of his life. During the sway of the thirty tyrants the reign of ter- ror in Athens a law was passed that no one should talk philosophy in the city. Socrates had used some striking imagery, a little while before, on the unskilfulness of a cowherd who should lose part of the drove every day, and see the rest growing sick and weak under his management. The gentlemen of the directory, who were con- fiscating property and murdering their townsmen, did not like such bucolic meditations, and one of them, a depraved wretch, the Greek Marat, could recall a conversation in which Socrates had en- lightened him in company on the spiritual dignity and worthiness of a pig. No sooner had Soc- rates heard of the law than he waited upon the rulers, to have a little conversation by which his uncertainty as to the meaning of the decree might be removed. "Pray tell me," said he, "whether you take philosophy, as stated in the statute, to con- sist in reasoning right or reasoning wrong, since, if you mean the first, we must beware how we reason right; if the latter, the consequence is Socrates. 139 plain we must mend our reasoning." The impu- dence was sublime ; it was like a Frenchman joking Tinville with the guillotine before his eyes ; and one of the board, choking with rage, replied : " We will give you terms easy to be understood ; refrain altogether from talking with young men." Here was a chance for definitions. " Suppose," said Socrates, " I want to buy something of a mer- chant, must n't I ask the price if the man is un- der thirty ? " " We don't prohibit that ; but keep a proper distance from carpenters, smiths, and shoemakers, and let us have no more examples from them." " Then I am not to concern myself any longer with justice and piety, and the rules of right and wrong ? " " By Jove, you must not ; and, Socrates, don't trouble yourself any further with the herdsmen, lest you occasion the loss of more cattle." Those miscreants did not hold power long enough after this to kill him, but, a year or two following, his case was brought before the tribunal of the people, three accusers appear- ing against him, with an indictment that held three counts, that Socrates did not believe the gods whom the city held sacred ; that he designed to introduce new deities ; that he corrupted the youth. It was one of the most singular and most inter- esting trials recorded in history. Socrates was seventy years old, and was really arraigned before his five hundred judges for being a universal cen- sor and intolerable bore. A crowd of his friends 140 Socrates. attended him, among them Plato. After the open- ing of the case by Melitus, Socrates was permitted to speak in his own behalf. Fearing that his bearing would not be most conciliatory to the benches, the rhetorician Lysias had been induced to prepare an artistic and elaborate defence, which Socrates was urged to read, with the assurance that it must produce acquittal. The inward voice, however, opposed the plan. "Think you," said he to his friend, " I have not spent my whole life in preparing for this very thing ? " Finely has Montaigne said : " Should a suppliant voice have been heard out of the mouth of Socrates ; that lofty virtue have struck sail in the very height of its glory ; and his rich and powerful nature have committed its defence to Art, and in her highest proof have renounced truth and simplicity, the ornaments of his speaking, to adorn and deck itself with the embellishments of figures and the equivocations of a premeditated speech?" He did not renounce truth, and simplicity. He cross- questioned his chief accusers sufficiently to show the falsity of the charges in their spirit, and then his talk was an impeachment of Athens, not a defence of his own career. " When your generals at Pohdara and Delium assigned my place in the battle, I remained there and faced the peril of slaughter ; and strange would it be, if, when the Deity has assigned my duty to pass my life in the study of philosophy and the examination of others, I should, through fear of death or anything else, Socrates. 141 desert my post." His serene haughtiness and affectionate assertion of superiority surprised his enemies, and determined the judges to put his temper to the final strain. They voted, and out of the immense ballot a paltry majority of six condemned him. His accuser proposed the pen- alty of death. The defendant had one oppor- tunity remaining to conciliate the judges by an humble confession, a petition for mercy, or a proposition of some different penalty. " I know not," said he, " whether death is an evil or no. I will not choose imprisonment, for I do not like it ; and why should I say exile ? A fine life, at my age, to go out wandering, and driven from city to city ! If I award what I think I actually deserve, I should say a public maintenance in the Pryta- neum. I am a poor man, and need leisure to be your benefactor, and it seems to me that I deserve such an honor more than one who has been vic- torious at the Olympic games in a horse-race. Perhaps, however, I could pay you a small fine ; about fifteen dollars is the top of my means. But Plato here, and Crito, offer to be surety for thirty times that sum. I therefore name that as my fine." Four hundred and fifty dollars was a cheap valuation of him even at seventy, but he had tossed his life away. The enraged judges pro- nounced sentence of death by a heavy vote. His friends were in great distress, but his calmness rose to majesty, and his playfulness to the highest eloquence. " If," said he in closing, " death is 142 Socrates. a removal from hence to another place, and if all the dead are there, what greater blessing can there be than this, my judges ? At what price would you not estimate a conference with Orpheus and Musaeus, Hesiod and Homer? For me to so- journ there would be admirable, when I should meet with Palamedes, and Ajax the son of Tela- mon, and others of the ancients who died by an unjust sentence. At what price would not any one estimate the opportunity of questioning him who led that mighty army against Troy, or Ulysses, or Sysiphus, or ten thousand others whom one might mention, both men and women ? " Heaven, to his imagination, had always been an atmos- phere of refined and vigorous talk. How 'fine and fitting that the old man's fancy should even then revel in the rich society and the glorious discussions to which the friendly vengeance of his foes would send him ! He begged his judges to punish his sons as they grew up, if they cared more for riches than virtue j he assured his ac- cusers that he bore no resentment to them ; he looked around for the last time upon the Athens which he loved and the citizens it was his great aim to serve, and left the agora amid his heart- broken friends to sleep fettered in the prison. The sentence could not legally take effect for thirty days. During that time his rich friend, Crito, through some briber)', made preparations for his escape, and went to him one morning before daybreak to perfect the plan. He was sleeping C V .X* quietly, and said, when awaked, " The tirhe/otynv death draws near : for in my dream just now a I . beautiful and majestic woman arrayed in whlte^^s?*^ seemed to approach me and to say, ' Socrates, three days and you will reach fertile Phthia ! ' ' Crito told him he had come to save him, and take him to Thessaly, where he could be secure and happy. But the old prisoner calmly reasoned down all his entreaties, and pictured to him how the personified laws of Athens would reproach him for his ingratitude if he should violate them then, how droll it would seem for him to escape wrapped in a disguise of cloaks and skins, and how much better it was to suffer than to commit injustice. " These things boom in my ears," said he, "like the swelling music of flutes, and make me deaf, my dear friend Crito, to all you say." He stayed to meet his fate. During his confine- ment he versified the fables of ^Esop, and com- posed a hymn to Apollo, in order, as he said, if possible, to obey and fulfil a dream which fre- quently warned him in life to apply himself to music. The pages of Plato give us a full account of the last day's intercourse between himself and friends in prison. After taking leave of his wife, the most of the day was occupied with a long and thorough treatment of the question of immor- tality. His friend Crito begged him not to talk ear- nestly and steadily, for the jailer had said that 144 Socrates. bodily heat would counteract the poison, and make his death more painful. " Then let them give it to me twice or thrice," he said, and went on with the discussion. The day wore away while that circle recounted the arguments, pre- sentiments, and myths that justify to reason the expectation of another life. As the sunset drew on, and the talk must close, a friend timidly asked, " How shall we bury you ? " " Just as you please," said he, with a smile, " if only you can catch me and I do not escape you." Here, as always, his pleasantry was the cool expression of his strongest faith. " Say that you bury my body, and do it as is pleasing to you and most agreeable to our laws." He bathed, bade farewell to his children, who were brought in, and then signified that he was ready to the executioner, who said, with flowing tears, that he was the most noble, meek, and excellent man that ever entered the prison. The sun was not quite set when the hemlock juice was brought to him in a cup. He inquired calmly what the symptoms would be, and when he might know that death was near; and, praying that his depart- ure might be happy, drank it slowly, looking stead- ily at the jailer, without trembling or change of color. His friends till that moment had borne up stoically ; but then they yielded to their emo- tions, and one of them screamed wildly in his agony. But Socrates, still walking, rebuked and cheered them all, and at last lay down to die. " Crito," said he, " we owe a cock to ^Esculapius ; Socrates. 145 pay it ; do not neglect it " ; and his spirit fled. ^Esculapius was the god of medicine and health. A pious Greek made offerings to him after being cured of any serious disease. The last words of Socrates were an enigmatical assurance to his friends that by the death of his body the disease of an earthly life was being cured, and his spirit restored to its native health. The judges of Socrates are forgotten ; his accusers are remembered with infamy by asso- ciation with his name ; his prison is one of the sacred places in the memory of the race ; while his career is the strength of reformers now, and preaches to all men the majesty of self-sacrifice and the glory of devotion ; and the loyalty of his life, the firmness of his principles, and the seren- ity of his bearing in his last hours fortify more powerfully than his arguments our faith in immor- tality. If his friends had had insight they might have gone away from that cell where the body of Soc- rates lay motionless and cold, with a conviction, a sense of certainty, that such a spirit was not ex- tinguished. His temper and impregnable faith, when death was approaching to take him by the hand and lead him into the shadow, are demon- stration to our moral instincts that it came as a friend to bear him up to a more congenial sphere, and bid him live more intensely and usefully in other scenes. Why, not a rigid bone of his lifeless body, not 7 J 146 Socrates. a hardening muscle or useless nerve of the stiff frame that once obeyed his will, was to be annihi- lated. God's economical laws took care of them, dissolved them, mingled them with dust and air, and turned them to new uses. They are living somewhere yet. Not a particle of his frame has perished in the great treasury of matter. And has that mind dissolved, that robust spiritual greatness, that muscular, invincible holiness, that inward eye which saw the light of eternal truth as the steady flame of a zenith star? Is there no world of spirits to receive such realities as these ? Must not such a nature have been a precious jewel of God while it lived and served him here ? And is the Almighty so penurious of matter, and so waste- ful of the wealth of perfect virtue, that he saves carefully each ounce of saintly servants' bodies, and permits their souls to be extinguished forever by a gill of poison, or shrivelled by a fever, or con- sumed in a wreath of flame ? We had better not believe that until we have emptied the universe of all that is divine. The life, the moral greatness, of Socrates, is an argument for immortality such as his logic could not frame, nor scepticism de- stroy; and thus his prison is a bright spot in human history, for it is a buttress of the soul's immortal hope. The most remarkable saying, perhaps, that has been reported of Socrates is this : " That in re- spect to these great questions we ought to take the best of human reasonings, that which is most Socrates. 147 difficult to be confuted, and embark on it as on a raft, so to sail through life amid its storms, unless we could be carried more safely in a surer convey- ance furnished in some Divine instruction." Down the River of Life, by its Athenian banks, he had floated upon his raft of reason serene, in cloudy as in smiling weather, for seventy years. And now the night is rushing down, and he has reached the mouth of the stream, and the great ocean is be- fore him, dim heaving in the dusk. But he betrays no fear. There is land ahead, he thought; eter- nal continents there are, that rise in constant light beyond the gloom. He trusted still in the raft his soul had built, and with a brave farewell to the few true friends who stood by him on the shore he put out into the darkness, a moral Columbus, trusting in his haven on the faith of an idea. 1851. IV. SIGHT AND INSIGHT. I ASK your attention to some thoughts that naturally range themselves under the for- mula, Sight and Insight. Vision is the most glorious privilege of hu- manity. The eye is our royal endowment among the senses. Physically, we are insignificant specks on the earth's surface ; but, by reason of the mar- vellous and exquisite eye, the loveliness of the earth is portion of our furniture. We stand on less than a square foot of soil, and the horizon is the wall of our dwelling, the zenith the roof of our home. One of our most marked distinctions from animals is this, that their eyes are the in- struments of instinct and the servants of greed, while the eye of man is a general organ, related to the universe as a vast, inspiring spectacle, and serving as the window of the mind and soul. There is a doctrine that all our knowledge comes through the senses, and chiefly by the eye. This is false. Sight of itself takes in only the surface-coloring of nature. The senses supply no knowledge, for they convey only impressions, Sight and Insight. 149 never ideas. We must see in the first place that the senses, which seem to furnish all our knowl- edge, are simply reporters. The all-important question as to knowledge is, What is at the other end of the sense, or nerve, to receive the report ? The eagle has a stronger eye than man. But set the Apollo Belvedere before it, and it sees only the articulated whiteness of a piece of stone. The human mind, out of the same sensations, dis- cerns a glorious statue. The stag has a better ear than man. But let it listen to an orchestra and it reports only a mob of tones, which, when they break upon the human nerve, are disposed instantly into a sonata or a symphony. Put a moss-rose to the nostrils of a hound and see if it will awaken, through his keen scent, any emotions of poetic delight. The senses of an animal report all that senses themselves can catch; but their owners do not have the faculties to arrange and interpret the sensations, and so having eyes they see not, and having ears they hear not. It is mind that draws meaning out of the reports which the senses make ; and so what they tell depends on the grade of the faculty to which they tell. All knowledge is, therefore, the result of in- sight, and education is a process of insight. How immense the scale which the human being travels in the training of his vision ! The infant begins by seeing everything as on the eye itself. The furniture of the chamber, and the parent's face, toys, trees, and sky, are a confused mass of color, 150 Sight and Insight. and seem to belong somehow to the little stranger's personality. It must learn, at first, to push the world off from itself by attributing dis- tance and size to the objects which the senses grasp ; and at last it comes to be a Herschel, with the globe as the pedestal of its imperial eye, measuring the awful distance of the Pleiades, gazing at Orion sculptured in light on the black walls of space, with his star-hilted dagger and his club of knotted suns. Let us take up the suggestion of this last state- ment, and learn what has been done, almost within a century, in laying out the scale of nature. How narrow, in contrast with ours, was the uni- verse into which an old Greek gazed through the shadows of night ; or David, when, looking up with nothing but eyesight as an instrument to help him, he chanted to the rude music of his harp the words, " The firmament showeth his handiwork " ! Can anything be more amazing than a simple statement of the triumph of thought in laying out the scale of nature ? Think what a few astronomers have done. Think of those dots of creamy light, that, in connection with our globe, are found to belong to our solar system. Our eyes can detect no apparent difference in their distance from us or from our sun. But con- sider how the human intellect, represented in a few students that " outwatch the Bear " in lonely towers, keeping its greedy eye upon them, has seen them swell into majestic orbs floating and Sight and Insight. 151 waltzing in immensity ; how it has spaced them millions of miles apart, each cutting a circle within the track of the other j how it has caught the plane on which they move, seeing them as they swing and sway, now dipping, now rising in their ceaseless sweep ; how it has measured mountains upon them and discovered snows that, on some of them, whiten the poles and melt in summer-time; how it has weighed their mass, telling how many myriads of tons each of those little dots includes, that we write poetry to as the morning or evening star, as if it had a Titan scale to put them in, with a beam poised at the zenith ; how, not content with running its line out hundreds of millions of miles m constructing this domestic solar system, it has stood on the spin- ning disk of a planet so far out in space as to be invisible to the naked eye, and then cast the lasso of its mathematics still beyond into the darkness and reined up another globe, whose existence it had guessed, and dragged it with its filial moons into the light of science ; how it has leaped upon the parent orb, torn open the blazing vesture of the sun, looked in upon his dark substance and stupendous ribs, wound its measuring line around his awful surface, and told his weight ; how it has followed the track of the comet fire-ships, reck- oned the leagues they rush into the bleak, black ether, and prophesied their return ; and how, not satisfied with all these trophies, its look has broken the spangled roofing of the night into an 152 Sight and Insight. airy and immeasurable arch, within which the solar system is a dot and its motions but a flicker ; how, after years of trial, it has found one of those tremulous suns, against which it might lean its ladder of spider threads and light, and then has mounted on it into the gallery of our firmament, probed through the ranks, five hundred deep, of orbs that swing in its dome, yes, lifted itself out upon the roof of this star-tiled St. Peter's of space, and gazed off thence upon the milky gleam of the spires of other cathedral firmaments that rise in the astral city of God ! This is the victory of the human mind over the deception which the eye would practise upon it as to the scale of nature. Modern astronomy is a" trophy of intellectual insight. When any of us are tempted to distrust propositions and princi- ples simply because they seem opposed to the settled material order of society, and appear con- tradictory to the instincts of selfishness, let us reflect that we begin to live intellectually in na- ture only when we grasp a principle that pitches the sun out of his path in the heavens, that dwin- dles the earth to a little marble in space, and that shrivels the visible wonders of the sky to motes floating in a flood of luminous vitality. All this grandeur of result has been made pos- sible by the most careful and reverent scrutiny of the most insignificant facts. The human intellect was made to conquer nature by watching and following the most delicate hints from facts which everybody observes. Sight and Insight. 153 Every pebble, every stick, is an index pointing a hundred ways. There is a path from it out into chemistry, into statics, into the laws of heat and light, into forces of gravitation and electricity, into atomic and organic sympathies, into the whole circle of the published wisdom of God. The geologist can see no further into a mill- stone than any boor can. But he can see a great deal further into the solid world, though no more facts are presented to his eye. Both of them ride this globe as mere gnats on the back of a wild rhinoceros. Yet the first detects the depth and nature of the intestines of the creature that flies with him twenty miles a second ; follows the wrin- kles and untwists the plaitings of its rocky hide, reads its age on its alpine warts ; writes its biog- raphy from its pulpy infancy till its bones had hardened, and up through the wild passions of its youth to its present maturity ; and is able to describe passages of its fortunes, a hundred thou- sand years ago, as clearly as he discerns the color of any district of its skin to-day. The vast proportions of science are reared by the interlocking of ordinary facts through the allusions that invest them. And more than half the distance from ignorance to science is accom- plished when a man learns to observe, to concen- trate his mind into his vision, so that he shall see accurately and intensely what Nature has set be- fore him. It is only when he sees the thing itself . strongly, that he can detect the shadowy lines 154 Sight and Insight. around it of vaster and modest facts, like the dusky thread that loops the space within the rim of the new moon, hinting the whole orb while only a segment is burnished with light. There is an old proverb that "What is ever seen is never seen." Science is now showing us what undrainable meaning lurks in the minute and common. Almost everything is told in any- thing, if the eye that looks through the sense is patient. Cuvier learned how to build up the whole animal from any single bone. And the microscope now enables us to tell from a flake of any bone what creature and what part of the creature it belonged to, and at what age of the world it lived. I was conversing, not a great while ago, with the most celebrated chemist of Massachusetts, and learned from him that a grain of corn contains material enough to lecture about for a month. Its structure is so complicated, its secrets so intricate, its relations to the finest and broadest forces of the universe so various and minute, that it is inexhaustible in ministries of instruction, wonder, and delight. Just as it is said of some Western roads, which begin spacious and grand, that they at last dwindle to a squir- rel-track and run up a tree, so we may say, with sober truth, that forces which guard the stateliest avenues of the universe run back, by convergent lines, till they meet in the mystery of a kernel of corn. Agassiz asks only for one scale and will draw Sight and Insight. 155 you the form of the fish that wore it, tell every fibre of its structure, the kind of waters it lives in, and the nature of the food it takes. From a fos- sil scale he sketched the shape and size of a fish unlike any in the catalogues of science, and has seen his sagacity verified by the discovery in another country of a petrified swimmer in pre- adamite seas precisely like his drawing. To understand anything thoroughly, we must understand all its relations ; and every highly organized product in nature is related to the universe. St. Augustine, fourteen hundred years ago, ridiculed the dying polytheism of Rome, which provided a separate deity for every process of nature, by showing that, on such a theory, it would require a hundred goddesses to weave a single flower, so many energies are involved in the work. A distinguished living geologist has published a pamphlet on the geological wonders that some pebbles hold. Taking his hint, suppose that we follow it into other fields, asking you if you under- stand a pebble. What, not understand a com- mon piece of stone that weighs an ounce or two ! Let us see. What is that you call its weight? It is the pull of the earth upon it in your hand, the relation between its mass and the earth's mass. Why does the earth pull thus at it ? It is the action of what we call the force of gravita- tion. Why does it pull so hard ? If the average substance of the earth were no denser than the ground directly beneath our feet it would not pull 156 Sight and Insight. so powerfully. That ounce or two of weight is, therefore, the sign and proof that the great globe is heavier as we descend, more weighty as a whole, than if it were all made of granite. Thus the intensity of its pull on the pebble opens into its relations to the mass of the sun and the mechan- ical structure of the solar system. Why, too, is the pebble solid in your hand? Why is it not a mass of sand ? The force of co- hesion is the answer. But why, if you pulverize it, will it not unite so again ? Why will not the whole pressure you can bring to bear upon it com- press it as tight as before ? What are the condi- tions and laws of that force ? Answer that ques- tion and you know a great deal. Break the pebble open, and you will doubtless find a sparkling piece of crystal in it. Explain that. A new force, not only of cohesion but of crystallization, appears. Tell how those particles were brought into that shining order, with angles and points as regular as a mathematician's dia- gram. The pebble grows more serious. Melt it, you make it a liquid. Increase the heat, you reduce it to two or three gases. It was only gases knotted and clinched. How and why did they combine so as to make that quality of stone? The same gases appear in a thousand different kinds of matter. Why do slight variations in their proportions produce such widely different results ? The mystery of atomic combination the fundamental mystery of chemistry starts out of the stone. Sight and Insight. 157 Again, the pebble is of a kind different from the stone in its neighborhood. It belongs to another stratum. How did it get out of that stratum upon the surface of the earth ? Geology must come in with its proofs of central fires, convulsions, and mountain upheavals to explain it. Room for an- other science must be found on the pebble. Its shape, too, how was that determined ? There are scratches on it that icebergs caused, grinding over the face of the inhabited world. There are water-lines in it, telling that it has lain under seas which once rolled over the present land. Or there are fire-stains, that report earthquake eruptions ages ago. These forces must all be united into a sys- tem if you would comprehend the pebble. Crack it and you will find a little fossil in it of a tribe of sea-creatures now extinct. It must have sunk into it when the pebble was fluid. How many ages ago? In what region of the earth? How was the creature fed, and what was its office? Then the color of the pebble, what is that ? Why are not all things of the same hue? The sun-ray holds several tints. How do they blend into colorless light, and what is the secret by which different surfaces reflect and absorb such unlike rays, thus suffusing the face of nature with countless tinges? You must answer this to ex- plain the tint of the pebble. The crystal beads, too, which it holds, have magnetic properties, point to the mystery of electric and polar currents. There are some old 158 Sight and Insight. manuscripts, called "palimpsests," from which you can rub off the writing and find another under- neath, and still a third and fourth under that, all of which by delicate art can be restored and read in turn. Thus some of Cicero's great works have been discovered under other and later writings. Is not the pebble a marvellous palimpsest, hold- ing convulsions of the earth and secrets of chem- istry and astronomical forces written in it ? The " sermon " in a common " stone " is woven of all the sciences. The man who understands it has insight into the physical system of the world. In fact, the story of science in relation to nature is poetically symbolized in a story of the Middle Ages, which perhaps many of you are familiar with, how a lady rescued her captured lover from the high tower in which he was impris- oned. His case seemed hopeless ; at any rate, what could she, a feeble woman, do to release him ? She caught a beetle, rubbed some honey on its nose, tied a long silk thread of the finest texture around its body, and placed the insect on the lowest round of the stony wall. Smelling the honey, and thinking it just ahead, the beetle climbed and climbed, trailing the delicate thread, till it reached the window of the captured knight. He caught the thread, pulled it in carefully, and lo! on the end of it was a twine, and gathering up the twine there was fastened upon that a rope, and pulling up the rope he secured it to the window bars and descended safely from his dungeon tower. Sight and Insight. 159 O, the wit of the women ! So the meanest fact has a law fastened to it, which reason seizes by its in- sight, and at the end of that law another and still back of that a nobler one, till at last the central force is detected and the sense-bound thought is free, and walks in the broad splendors of truth. The chief difference between a very wise man in natural science and an ignorant one is, not that the first is acquainted with regions invisible to the second, away from common sight and interest, but that he understands the common things which the second only sees. If we appreciated such facts as these we should be delivered from the danger of looking outwardly into large and blazing wonders of space for pecul- iar revelations of the Creator. Some persons dream that if they could be carried away from what is so familiar around them on this planet, and see the wonders of far-off skies or look at the harmonies of a system of worlds, they would have proofs of the Infinite One which are denied to them now. But such revelry of sight would not help them. It is insight they need. The Infinite is not revealed in scale or splendors of space, but in the wisdom that is manifest in facts whatever be their scale. And nothing less than Infinite Wisdom is expressed in a daisy. Whoever looks beyond the life and growth of that, with an appe- tite for something more startling and stupendous as a proof of God's existence, is in an atheistic atmosphere now. His mind has divorced nature 160 Sight and Insight. from intellect, and no sight or external logic will weld them for him. If a daisy can live without God a firmament can. The true process is not to wring out an Infinite Mind by twisting a nebula, but to look with humility and gladness into each fact of nature and see Him reflected as in the face of a mirror there. The primal distinction in eyes is that some see facts, others see what facts stand for, and the de- grees of this difference measure the whole distance between a Bushman and Newton, between igno- rance and knowledge. The difference between sight and insight, and the power of insight, are illustrated also in the domain of beauty. It is not the senses that dis- cern the outside vesture of beauty upon the world. You never surprise a dog, deer, or bear gazing with satisfaction at the loveliness of the meadow, the curve of a river, or the grandeur of a moun- tain. They see all the facts as an inventory could be taken of them, but not the charm of color, grace, or motion into which the details blend. The man is to be pitied who has no intellectual insight into the truth of any district of nature ; but it is a sadder thing to see a man on whom all bloom is wasted, who carries an eye that shaves the twinkle from every star, who disenchants the light, and, wherever he moves, brushes the halo from nature. One of the vices of our Amer- ican intellect in this age of mechanism is its essentially mechanical conception of nature, as Sight and Insight. 161 though the solar system runs by clock-work and the stars are whirled by bands, belts, and drums. It was a typical Yankee who said once to a friend of mine at Niagara, before the roar of the English fall, "Well, I snum, I don't understand how it wallops over in that way. I 'd like to see the whole consarn unscrewed for about five min- utes and then put up agin." So it is that our universe is becoming one of carpentry, lathed and plastered together with constellations clap- boarded on the sky, and not a swimming poem and mystery. As to his humanity, a man would be an un- speakable loser to give up the power of enjoying a landscape, if he has it in any fine degree, for a legal title to all the land in New England ; for his soul would give up the birthright of a perpetual dividend of joy from the infinite art by which all matter is moulded. The insight that discerns beauty is of a higher order than that which discerns mathematical truth. I would not look through the great Cambridge telescope at the present comet, if the sight thus of its boiling nucleus and its more voluminous trail should blunt, afterwards, the perception of its exquisite curve so tenderly shaded off into the gloom of the zenith, a weird scimitar of light, fit for the hand of an archangel. Science is the prose and beauty the poetry of the visible world. But one of the noblest triumphs of insight is gained when the truth of the world, as read by 1 62 Sight and Insight. science, is itself transmuted into beauty. One great value of scientific education is, that it en- larges immensely the area in which the mind lives, gives a boundless horizon and an im- measurable dome for our intellectual home, so that we can have the sense of grandeur for a re- source and as a rich undertone in the whole life. And a still higher value is won, when the mind, through the revelations of science, feels itself surrounded and overarched by a more subtle beauty and charm than the outward aspects of nature supply. Sometimes we hear lamentations of the decay of poetic fascination from nature by the banish- ment of all the exquisite fancies of elder igno- rance and the myths of the classic theology. But we are richer in material of poetry to-day by rea- son of our spreading science than any age has been. What a palace of splendors our cold explorers have been building with trowels of mathematics and the cement of law ! What if they have worked like journeymen at their tasks, lifting the rough stones, item by item, without a sense of beauty, and putting in the oriel windows as glaziers, not as artists ? Is it any the less a Cologne Cathedral they are erecting ? And when their scaffoldings are knocked away, is it not beauty rather than masonry they have been rear- ing by their toil ? Let any one read Lieutenant Maury's book on the Ocean, and ask if we have Sight and Insight. 163 lost material of poetic inspiration and expres- sion by the banishment of majestic Neptune, whose chariot-wheels scarce touched the glassy azure, and the Tritons with their shell-fish fingers and their porpoise fins. Mr. Campbell mourns that, " When Science from Creation's face Enchantment's veil withdraws, Such lovely visions yield their place To cold material laws." He said this of the rainbow, but it is Science that detects the enchantment in the light. Each pulse of it beats nearly two hundred thousand miles a second without jostling the air. It may blow never so hard, or it may be dead calm, and those vibrations fall equally serene. The most spiritual element in nature is the most stable. Eleven millions of miles a minute from the sun without any visible or conceivable chords of communica- tion, every inch of the air a conductor, every ray of it stranded of seven hues, and an eighth element besides which slips through the prism and is the soul of all, never resting and never wasting in its journey of ages, it rather dims the marvel and the poetry of the Atlantic cable. And yet the relations of light and our eye are more astonishing still. To get the sensation of redness, our eyes are affected four hundred and eighty-two millions of millions of times in a sec- ond ; of yellowness, five hundred and forty-two millions of millions j and of violet, seven hundred 164 Sight and Insight. i and seven millions of millions of times. I quote from the careful Sir John Herschel, who says that " they are conclusions to which any one may most certainly arrive who will only be at the trouble of examining the chain of reasoning by which they have been obtained." So that the seven-hued rainbow, whose firm and subtle flame is reared out of drops of water that are ever shifting, is the result of a play upon the keys of the human eye so astonishing that, though figures may state it, the strongest mind staggers like an infant under the awful revelation. Think, too, of the marvels of vegetable growth : how the oak draws almost nothing from the soil, but is instituted air and rain ; how the chains of mountains, as has recently been said, are made of gases and rolling wind; how Nature, out of one element of moisture, pours through the veins of trees the juices of the peach, the pear, the apple, and the plum, and conjures all the various nectar of all climes out of dew, so that the mystery of the miracle of Cana is repeated within the soft vesture of the grape that distils wine, not, as in some Boston cellars, out of vitriol and logwood, but out of vapor and sunlight at the bidding of God. " Tmth is fair ; should we forego it ? Can we sigh right for a wrong ? God himself is the best poet, And the real is his song." Perhaps the most fascinating picture which the Greek mythology has transmitted to us is that of Sight and Insight. 165 delicate and resplendant Aphrodite, goddess of beauty, who rose out of the sea, as the fable ran, and hastened, with rosy feet, to the land, where grass and flowers spring up beneath her tread. Yet what is this exquisite picture, as a stimulant of the poetic sense, in comparison with the fulfil- ment of its dim suggestion in modern discoveries ? What is it in contrast with the real Aphrodite of science whose substance is the misty exhalation of the ocean, and who wears the rainbow for a scarf? All the verdure of nature is born from the foam of the sea. If every spring-time it should rise miraculously from the salt deeps, if all trees, all grains, all flowers, should spring at once from the brine and be wafted by magic to adorn the land, it would be only a sensuous exhibition of the fact which poetic insight discovers when it takes from science the truth that the sunbeams coax fresh vapor from the ocean's treasury ; how the winds sweep them over the land, and how, dropping in dew and pouring in showers, they do robe the rocks with verdure interwoven with flowers, spread the face of nature with nodding loveliness, and so open to our conception a purer Aphrodite than the ancient one, the daughter of God, her step on every blossoming patch of our soil, and her tunic brilliant with the representative flora of the globe ! The processes of nature, to the mind that pen- etrates to the springs of truth, supply richer beauty to thought than the visible bloom affords. 1 66 Sight and Insight. It may be thought that all this is very unpracti- cal. But can there be any greater advantage to the mind from any study than to feel that it is pa- vilioned amid infinite poetry ? Can there be any- thing more unpractical than to waste the opulence of creative thought, in whose mystic movement we are embosomed, and which the study of a few books would open? If there were some process of mental cultiva- tion that should produce the magical result of enlarging the house we live in, widening its walls, lifting its stories higher, lining it with ex- quisite pictures, thrilling the air of it with music, so that the entrance into each room would awaken peculiar delight, there would be little need of arguing for the practicalness of it to the most tor- pid miser. Insight widens, enriches, and embla- zons the world, moving off the walls of the senses, bringing out the traceries and colors of the inces- sant imagination of the Creator. Wherever the body stays, the mind that will vitalize, through a few volumes that are level to an average compre- hension by one winter's reading, the revelations of modern science, can live ideally, as passing from gallery to gallery of a magician's castle. Let a fool own a park and live in it, and he sees only the shell of some trees and the surface of some visible ground. Let Humboldt live in a porter's lodge by its gate, and he will feel that he is riding on a rolling wheel among the stars. We come to a fresh and nobler field for the Sight and Insight. 167 illustration of our subject in turning from the natural to the social world, from matter to man. If we could find a person that has complete in- sight into a man, who could be said to know a single man thoroughly, we should find a person who comes as near to knowing everything as a finite creature can. All the inorganic forces of laws are told in the best crystal. All organic and vegetable truth culminates in the best plant. All wisdom of every degree, from every kingdom, rushes to a focus in any single human form. The human being is the head of the animal creation. The lower orders of life, rising epoch after epoch and grade by grade, flower out in the proportions of his limbs and the implements of his frame. Nature struggled up through a myriad experiments and efforts to attain the perfected ex- cellence of his eye, which commands all nature and catches the hints inwoven with the light with the subtlest truths of the universe. She spires up through the ears of the lower ranks of crea- tures to his ear, the highway of all the music of nature and the exquisite melodies and harmo- nies of genius. She ripens the skill that buds in the fish's fin, the horse's hoof, and the lion's paw, in the twenty-nine bones of the human hand, so supple in their jointings, and clothed with such delicate sensibility, that all industry and cunning and art are prophesied in their mechanism. In the Garden of Plants in Paris there is a build- ing devoted to the progressive arrangement of the 1 68 Sight and Insight. bones of all creatures, living and fossil, that have bones. The mind runs up the scale of vertebrae till it comes to the human spine and its appen- dages. The spine sits on the throne of matter. It is not without subtile scientific propriety, therefore, that we talk in the political world now about the dignity and necessity of backbone. Life climbs by spines. The skull and jaw we find now are simply continuations and developments of the back-bone. A man without backbone has no sci- entific right to skull or jaw. And if some men should be obliged to take the shape that corre- sponds to the dignity and stamina of their con- victions, we should see them in Congress as talking jelly-Ashes or huge mollusks, rather soft shelled than hard. The physical man stands at the apex of the pyramid of matter, all the juices, flavors, and fatness of the world converging to enrich his blood and renew his flesh, and incarnate them- selves in his organism ; all the forces of nature^ light, heat, atmosphere, electricities, chemical af- finities, magnetisms, circulating around him and refreshing his strength ; all the subtile arts of matter playing in the secretions and the mysteries of his moving laboratory of life. Your spirit steps into your body to ride and wield the harnessed forces of the world. And now within the material home is the in- tellectual structure of a man, which mental phi- losophies for ages have been trying to measure Sight and Insight. 169 and report in its large and graceful proportions of reason, sentiment, passion, will. And interpene- trating and towering over this is the beauty that belongs to the human being ; not the mere phys- ical beauty which hides and yet shines in the fashioning of the limbs, and which glows in the glorious marble of the Apollo, but the splendor of intellectual strength that showers from the eye, the calm that sleeps mysteriously upon a brow, the majesty that enthrones itself over an eyebrow, and lowers from the bony circle an inch or two in sweep, built for an eye like Webster's, a majesty which, when Nature tries to intimate with physical material, she splits a notch in the New Hampshire mountains, and bars the awful walls with a bare precipice of granite, a pride of power like that shed from the chest of Goethe, a commanding, all-potent presence that swathed the form of Washington. And above all these insignia of meaning and mystery are the spiritual forces that live and work deeper and deeper in a human being, playing even through his flesh as visibly as chemical pro- cesses leave their traces there. For, at the same moment that the powers of the stomach are send- ing the flush of physical health to the cheek, a force of Heaven is writing there, with delicate pencil more subtle than a sunbeam, and more enduring than a graver's steel, a line of expression, telling of reward for some good deed or noble sacrifice. And while the brandy a man takes immoderately 170 Sight and Insight. is publishing itself in the hue of his countenance, a brush from the pit is reaching up to leave the stain of a passion, or the coarse turn of a habit and a sin. Every power of this universe is at work upon every man, all the science, all the beauty, all the forces of the realm of intellect, all the pencils of the regions of heaven and hell. Every sphere surrounds each human frame. Our feet are in the dust, but we rise through all cli- mates, zones, kingdoms, and there is no one of us whose base is not in the world of darkness, and the summit of whose being does not pierce at times to the secret heavens. The compact of his spirit and his body, his presence everywhere in it and invisible, the har- monies of his frame, the laws of its health and the laws of its disease, the services of its interdepend- ent members, the balance of voluntary and involun- tary forces, the climbing grade of implements and energies, bone, muscle, vein, blood, and nerve, the equal need in it of gross and airy aliment, the control in it of the chemical over the mineral pro- cesses, the vital over the chemical, the moral and spiritual over the vital and intellectual, lifting him as a series of kingdoms, with his feet in the dust and his soul in the heavens, these facts and rela- tions of a human being tell you the manner in which. God pervades the universe; tell you the deepest laws of society, which is built on the pat- tern of the human form ; tell you about the unity in the great ranks of service in a state ; tell you the Sight and Insight. 171 methods of public disease and the conditions of health ; tell you the spirit that should be supreme in all government, collecting the finest forces of the skies to run invisibly into every limb and organ of the body politic. You remember the old story how Menenius Agrippa quelled the insurrection of the Roman populace by his allegory of the belly and the members. They knocked under at once to that ventriloquism. The Apostle Paul set forth the propriety of different ranks of office in the church, and the equal need of all, in the argument, "If the whole body were an eye where were the hearing?" etc. He shows that its life is bound up into one stream by the assurance, " If one member suffer all the members suffer with it, and if one member rejoice all the members rejoice with it." This we feel to be not simply rhetoric, but reasoning from types. It was the same kind of logic that an old fellow used against the opposition to the protec- tion of manufactures and other branches of Ameri- can industry, on the ground that it was wrong to grant special privileges. " Don't you see," said he, " you can't fat your finger ? Try to fat your middle finger, and you have to put flesh on your ribs and arms to do it." Society is yet a body diseased. We could draw its picture as a man staggering under maladies. Every vice and dis- order in it answers to some cough, cramp, or canker of the human frame, from the fever-and- ague of our traffic to the squint in our politics 172 Sight and Insight. which prevents the eyes of the government from looking North. Whoever could bring a theory of social organization that would take up and fill out the analogies and orders of the human frame, would need no other logic to demonstrate its truth. Shrewd Rochefoucauld said that " it is easier to know men in general than any man in particular." Complete insight into a man discloses not only these grand and subtile relations that hold in hier- oglyphic the divine laws of society, but detects the personal structure and quality of character. A physician can educate his eye so as to see in the hue of the skin the tone of the system and the amount of a man's abuse of the laws of health. Clairvoyant mediums have been known to tell from a hair sent them in a letter the disease the person is suffering. Each part of the body has the character of the whole body in it. There is no miracle in the most wonderful instance of these somnambulic readings, because the fact of every man's physical condition is in every flake of his skin, and a heightened power of perception catches it naturally. So some persons have the faculty of insight into character. They see a man in a moment ; read him, feel him, in an instant. Great noise has been made about phrenology, whether, by labo- rious fingering in the valleys and over heights of the skull, one may concoct the character of the subject. But we ought to see that a man is scrawled all over with "ologies." Every nerve, Sight and Insight. 173 every hair, every motion, every nail, is steeped in the essence of the person, and radiates it. We are published not only geographically in the skull, but by the whole configuration, and by effluence back of configuration and streaming through it. There is a tone-science ; showing how character breathes in voice ; there is a tooth science, there is nose- ology, eye-ology, as well as phrenology. Each limb, organ, act, is a battery of the soul. Lavater, the great physiognomist, said that he could tell by the different ways in which fingers dropped money into the contribution-box of the church what their tem- peraments and controlling dispositions were. I suppose that the way a man's fingers don't drop it tells just as clearly. Zschokke, a Swiss clergyman and novelist, had the singular power at times of seeing the history of persons that came into his presence. How, he knew not, but facts in a man's career would some- times stand just as clearly before his mind as the outward man before his eye. He was a moral clairvoyant. The veil dropped from his vision that hides to most of us the substance of character. All a man's experience is funded in him. We go about printing off proof-impressions of our- selves every minute in the spiritual air. And the finger-power which some natures have of detect- ing by subtle feeling the quality of others the mesmeric power which feels from a letter tbe state of soul in which it was written is perhaps only an intimation of the kind of world we are to live 174 Sight and Insight. in when the body drops away, and there can be " nothing secret that shall not be made manifest, neither anything hid that shall not be known and come abroad." The highest range of study in which the distance between sight and insight is measured, and where the triumphs of insight are more vivid, is that of history. No man knows the science of nature who simply catalogues all the facts that are patent to his eye ; and so a man may commit to memory every incident of mortal experience, the date of every occurrence, the birth and death of every great man of every kingdom, yes, of every inhabitant of the globe, the arithmetic and fortunes of every bat- tle that has been fought, and still not have advanced an inch towards an acquaintance with the story of humanity. It is when he begins to see the ideal relations and harmonies and lessons of these facts that insight into history begins. Think what it is to know Europe as it exists to-day ! There is the gazetteer's knowledge, so many acres, so many people, so many languages, so many houses, offices, art-rooms, temples, ruins. There is the politician's knowledge, estimating the power, the material forces, the passions, the attitudes, the purposes, of the states that checker its surface. But higher than these, and including them, the only real knowledge of Europe is that of the philosopher, who knows how it came to be what it is ; who knows the classic, barbaric, and Christian elements that have interplayed and over- Sight and Insight. 175 shot each other in the web of its life ; what stocks have intermixed to produce each people and de- termine its character ; how the art arose that gems it ; from what deeps of sentiment its cathedral spires have risen ; when the creative seasons of its literature have dawned ; from wtiat boiling anarchies its now heavy and hoary despotisms were cast up ; what cheering and disastrous forces are at work in its life to-day ; and so what ten- dencies, according to the infallible laws of public growth, are pointing to and fashioning its future. All this knowledge streams out of Europe. It is a perpetual exhalation from the visible facts to the mind that has insight, or can feel the impal- pable. Without it a man knows only the corpse of the continent, not its life, its soul. And thus it is that a man must study the registers of ancient time. Niebuhr, Bunsen, Car- lyle, Grote, have few other sources of knowledge than old Rollin had. They cannot manufacture a new fact. It is the sharper eye, the profounder mind, the flaming moral sense, which makes the difference between dates and facts as they lie loose, and the same particulars as they knit them- selves, upon their pages, into the anatomy, the physiology, the expression, and the character of a kingdom or an age. The science of history has been making im- mense advances, of late, by the disclosure of new material. The grave has been disgorging some of its dead empires for our instruction. We have 176 Sight and Insight. heard the buried bones of old Nineveh rattle under their desolate mound, and have seen its cracked and half- calcined skeleton lift itself, at the incantation of an English traveller, to glare with blank eye-sockets upon the changes of three thousand years. But battered Sphinx and Aztec masonry and unhearsed Babylon have not sup- plied such vivid and far-reaching knowledge of the past as the keen scrutiny of the wrecks of language has disclosed. Little things in the frag- ments of literature and tradition tell great things, as the scale of Agassiz conjures the spectre of the fish that once wore it in the flesh. Literature is so steeped in the vitality of a nation that it sheds the composite aroma of the national for- tunes, as it has been said by a great critic that out of any one of Shakespeare's plays, the most imaginative, the least historic, the essential history and civilization of England, up to Shake- speare's time, could be unravelled. Languages tell more than ruins and external annals. They tell the story of migrations, relationships, col- lisions, and interfusions of race. A word or two in a vocabulary, the structure and inflections of a verb, report the cousinship of widely sundered peoples, their original nearness in space and kin. Thus continually new and more important in- struction is opening to us from the past. As we are carried further away from past generations and the ancient world, we come closer to them Sight and Insight. 177 intellectually, and penetrate more deeply the truth their experience incarnated. Many of you recall the little pamphlet, entitled " The Stars and the Earth," published a few years since, which contained some entertaining fancies founded on the laws of light. If one could be present now in some orb of the firmament to which the light from our globe would be a hun- dred years in travelling, he would, if he could by a miraculous vision gaze upon our earth, see what was going on here a hundred years ago. Let him remove still back in space to a point which light needs more than two thousand years to reach, and its beams would carry to him the picture of Socrates and his contemporaries ; and the farther back he should be removed the more ancient would be the people and the kingdoms that would be given, fresh and living, to his eye. The historic glass does work this magic for us as we move off from the ancient world and time. We have men among us who know Greece to-day better than the average intellectual Greeks did. We can study now each great state of antiquity as a whole. We can perceive the working of law in organizing the state as one body in time, and study the secret, slow, and sublime play of provi- dential forces in compacting its organism, and then unnerving its strength and paralyzing it for evil. Our insight seizes perspective, and detects symmetry, and puts each movement into relation with a persistent force or law. 8* L 1 78 Sight and Insight. And the lesson which the mind that has insight sees inwrought with history, striking through the story of every nation, and making every promi- nent page transparent for its rays, is that every nation is under the moral laws, veined by them and electric with them. The Infinite Justice gazes out of every historic chapter as out of paragraphs of Exodus and Jeremiah. All " Books of the Kings " are serious and sacred. Milton gives us the picture of Michael the archangel showing to Father Adam, from a high mountain, the flow of human fortunes. He purged with euphrasy and rue the visual nerve which pierced even to the inmost seat of mental sight, and unveiled to him the procession of empires and the long, sad lineage of sufferings and wrongs. The historic student looks back from such a height and with such a purged vision, and he sees that nothing is stable but justice. Empires shrivel and waste like ghosts because they import too little of the eternal substance to be adjusted to the tremendous forces of Provi- dence. Isaiah's insight is gained at once by cool-blooded science on that meditative height. Nations do not die from foreign blows, or from old age, or from too great weight of possessions, but from their meagre organization, their failure to distribute their classes by the principle of fra- ternity, their opposition, through ignorance or insolence, to that righteousness which is the inmost truth of things. They break the law of Sight and Insight. 1 79 God, as they suppose, for their convenience and aggrandizement, and find instead that it has broken them. Thus learn, insight into history is insight into to-day. All great problems are here. Just as Diomedes saw the gods in the battle, according to the Iliad, when Pallas Athene blew the mist from his eyes, every man who has had clear in- sight into history sees the antagonist gods, the powers divine and infernal, struggling amid the confusions and roar of our national experience, as clearly as in the days of Ahab and Elijah, Herod and the Baptist, Nero and Paul. In fact, if he has not been able to see them thus pitted against each other on the prairies of Kansas or in the literature of the Dred Scott decision, it is of no consequence what he sees in the story of Ahab or in his mummy New Testament. The practical reading of this fact is that states- manship is pre-eminently the science demanding insight. It is the highest trust, and asks the deepest wisdom. The grades of statesmanship are always determined by what the men see work- ing in the nation. And that only is real states- manship which guides itself by what history shows to be the enduring omnipotent forces, just as that is the only seamanship which guides by the eternal lights and the tested charts. A demagogue would guide a state, not by in- sight or sight either. He sails in a fog and steers by the ear. An executive politician, the man i8o Sight and Insight. whom we delight to call practical, shapes his course by a conception, perhaps, of the com- mercial and material greatness of his country. He counts himself one of the managers of a great business firm ; and his conceptions of the func- tions and duties of government would be filled out by putting over the National Capitol a huge sign : " South Carolina, New England, Ohio, & Co., dealers in negroes, cotton, hams, and hay." So long as he can keep the partners from quarrel- ling, and make the firm pay ten per cent under the parchment constitution, he considers his office discharged. But the statesman knows, as clearly as he sees the sun in heaven, that the real constitution of every kingdom is an unwritten one. He knows that, according to forces that no pen can create and no votes can bar, forces that play around and bend and magnetize all others, forces of character which after a while steal into the arith- metic of the nation's ledgers, ooze up from the soil and affect the harvests, travel with the colo- nists that seek the new land, distil through the breath of court-rooms, and so rot or rivet the invisible bolts of social union, the nation is doomed to expansion and vigor or to barbarism and ruin. He knows how nations ought to live, because he sees how nations have died. See how the imperial Roman oak of history died. Its religion perished first; its hardihood sunk into effeminacy, so that it had no living con- Sight and Insight. 181 nection with the treasury of spiritual forces in the soil and the air. And then the sap in its huge veins began to dry ; the fibrous muscles which centuries had toughened shrank; the leaves shriv- elled from juiceless stems ; the bark softened ; caterpillars and worms and bugs from all the Eastern sinks made their home in it ; and, finally, a howling storm of barbarism set it from the Northeast, amid which, in its vigorous days, the forest monarch would have stood erect, with hardly the loss of a filial leaf, but which now whirled branches and boughs before its gusts and left the crippled trunk, a show of its greatness, to crumble and rot into the soil of time. Trajan's Column, jthe battered arch of Constantine the Great, the ivied segment of the Colosseum walls, the crum- bling colonnades of the Acropolis, are the letters in cipher before a statesman's eye, rising over the imperial cemeteries of history, hinting an impor- tant fact or two as to the constitution that knits and governs a people really. What sight so frightful, therefore, as to see a great nation with a mighty future, guided, in its critical season, by men who have no social in- sight, no moral enthusiasm warming their wisdom, no faith in the superior permanence of moral over commercial forces, men who, it should seem, must have read history with cataracts over their eyes. Goethe had a fancy that some men are edu- cated into such large proportioned minds on this 1 82 Sight and Insight. globe that they become, when they die, the spirits of planets, diffusing their energy through the sub- stance of a world. This is a good definition of the capacities a great public man should have. Very often the reverse is the case. Pygmies con- trive to perch themselves on Alps. As a shrewd farmer once said of one of our Presidents : " We thought he was something of a man when we had him in our State ; but come to spread him out over the whole Union, he does average dreadful thin." The position given to some men on this earth, with regard to a nation, is scarcely less sublime than if we could see a mortal leap on a star to steer through space. If an astronomer should follow such a voyager with his glass, he might ad- mire the energy with which he should kindle furi- ous fires beneath its granite boilers, whip it like a top, and make it whirl swifter and swifter on its axis ; but would he think that it showed any celestial statesmanship to guide it contrary to the law of gravitation ? Whoever should be at the helm, would he not prophesy, with some surety, that, by the constitution of the solar system, it was whizzing towards a smash-up, to be beached on chaos ? Historical, political, and social insight discerns the one deepest law which rules under the votes of parliaments and senates just as surely as the law of gravity upholds the Capitols they sit in ; and it bows to them with a reverence that would Sight and Insight. 183 seek to twist the certainties of the multiplication- table for private benefit as soon as to doubt their despotism. Behind the facts of nature which the sunlight kindles up is the order in which they play, and which the studious intellect explores. Around the facts, and diffused, also, through the order, is the beauty which tempts and feeds another eye. And now, deeper than order and beauty together, play- ing through both and using both, is the spiritual meaning, the symbolism, of the facts which lie before the senses. A finer insight, a more search- ing eye, is needed for this sphere, and richer results reward it. Each thing in nature is a hiero- glyphic. It has a structure which science draws, a color which taste appreciates, a use of which skill avails, and it stands for something, it holds and hides a message which spiritual insight catches. The world was not whittled into Shape. God could not create anything other than vitally, so that it should be magnetized with all his attri- butes and exhale them to faculties fine enough to receive the effluence. This is the reason every great writer utters his thought in imagery. The world is his dictionary. The processes of life all around him hurry to his pen, eager to be the rhetoric of his ideas. No sooner is a new science perfected and clinched to the intellect by the calculus, than it dissolves into a finer fluid for the inkstand of the poet and the seer. It offers new and glowing symbols of human life and the highest moral truth. 184 Sight and Insight. Set a golden statue by Phidias before a child, and it sees a mass of brilliant color ; before an avaricious eye, and it gloats over the stately embod- iment of so much cash ; before a devotee of anat- omy, and he finds a revelation of so much bodily proportion ; before a mineralogist, and he per- ceives so much chemical and mineral truth ; before an artist, and he gazes upon so much skill and beauty; before a man of moral insight, and he discerns the grandeur of a God transfusing its sub- stance, pouring over the brightness of its limbs, controlling its symmetry, breathing in undrainable suggestiveness from its face. Each eye lights upon a truth, but the last one pierces to the finest, highest, all-penetrating, all-dominating truth. So it is in the world. The senses simply stare at nature ; the mind looks, and finds law ; the taste combines, and enjoys art ; the soul reads, and gains the permeating wisdom. Take a spear of growing wheat, and, after its chemical secrets and its beauty of structure are detected and appreciated, it turns to language, as when a religious writer illustrates humility by it in the figure. The mind that knows most is the most reverent, just as the ear of grain that is full- est bends over beneath the sky. A wisp of wheat has been carried to the noblest mill when a Chris- tian poet extracts that flour from its grains. So the whole universe turns into a dictionary for the uses of the inseeing mind. Christianity uses most freely the broad rich Sight and Insight. 185 facts of nature, in parables and allegories, to state its doctrines, putting its light within the ordinary facts that we see, and making them glow as transparencies of celestial truth. The universe was created so as to serve the prophet's purposes, and be a sermon. All the dark facts in it dissolve into ink to write the folly and doom of evil ; all the winning and cheering facts in it melt into light to commend and eulogize what is good. When you have demonstrated the law of gravitation and have hidden its force in the dark substance of the sun, and shown it grasping thence the farthest planet that ploughs the chilly ether and balancing a family of worlds, have you not also shown how the justice of the Infinite Mind impalpably grapples all the spirits of the globe, however far they wander from him, and holds nations, as well as men, by the fine, awful tendrils of his law. And when you untwist the rays that leap unstinted and forever from the vesture of the sun, and find in each wave of them light and heat and all colors and vitality, and find them flooding the air of every planet as easily as they visit one, and present to every eye, kind- ling all nature for it, with no more labor than in doing it for one ; inflicting pain upon the dis- eased retina by the same beneficence that blesses the well one, and illumining a different world for each mind it visits according to its culture or its purity, have you not found a finer, vaster solar astronomy by your analysis and research ? found 1 86 Sight and Insight. a pictured statement of the interblending of .Infinite Mercy and Truth in the rays that stream continually in upon the soul's world, how they bless us and color us according to our faculty of reception, and how they visit and rule every heart and will as easily as they fall upon one ? In every department of nature "like a finer light in light," the last word of any discovery, the soul of the fact, is moral. The earth " Is but the shadow of heaven and things therein Each to the other like, more than on earth is thought." There may be a meadow farm among the moun- tains. The heir to it gets a cabbage and a corn- crop from it, suspecting no other latent fertility and produce. A man of science buys it, gets no less cabbages and hay, but reaps a geology-crop as well. An artist buys it, and lo ! a harvest of beauty and delight, budding even when the grain is garnered, dropping sweet into his eyes even from arctic dawns and blazing snows. A man of deepest insight lives on it, and the laws of his farm open to him the prudence and prodigality of Providence. In the way the grain grows, the enemies it has, the friendships of all good forces to its advance, in the chemistry of his farming, in the peace that sleeps on the hills, in the gathering and retreat of storms, in the soft approach of spring, and the melancholy death he reads lessons that become inmost wisdom. He has a faculty that is the sickle of more subtle crop-sheaves of spiritual truth. Sight and Insight. 187 The different ways in which different tempera- ments and states of heart regard nature is very simply and sweetly stated in a little German poem of which I saw a translation yesterday. Two men had gone up from the city to visit the sum- mit of one of the Alps. They returned, and their kindred pressed about them to know what visions they had enjoyed. " 'T was a buzz of questions on every side. ' And what have you seen ? Do tell ! ' they cried. " The one with yawning made reply, ' What have we seen ? Not much have I ! Trees, mountains, meadows, groves, and streams, Blue sky, and clouds, and sunny gleams.' " The other, smiling, said the same ; But with face transfigured, and eye of flame : ' Trees, meadows, mountains, groves, and streams, Blue sky, and clouds, and sunny gleams.' " Just as there are spelling-classes for the young- est scholars in our schools, in which the separate letters are the chief things they see, where the great problem is to combine them into words, and where the mental organs are not capable of configuring words into propositions, so very few of us on the planet ever get able to handle the letters of nature easily, ever get beyond the power of spelling them into single words. Some are able to read off the aspects of creation into science. They can put the stars together into paragraphs that state laws and harmonies and grandeurs. Some go farther, and rhyme the mighty vocabulary of science into beauty; but 1 88 Sight and Insight. few get such command of the language that they see and rejoice in the highest, glorious truth which the volume holds. " What ! " says friend Purblind Horneye, " do I not see all there is around me ? Are not my senses as good as yours ? What stuff to talk of more realities right about me than the sunshine and fields and streets and my office, my ledgers, my bank-books, my horses, and my house!" "But how- is it, Brother Purblind, about studying the Iliad ? If you know all the Greek letters on all the pages, do you master it? Are not the words to be* looked out? Is not their sense to be detected? Are not the style and rhythm to be appreciated and enjoyed? the characters delineated there to be known and discriminated? the connections and unities and poetic and moral laws to be felt and comprehended ? After your senses have seen all that there is to be seen, have you done anything more than reach the threshold of what there is to see ? What now, O materialistic Brother Horn- eye, if the universe, right about thee, is a sort of Iliad .of the Infinite Mind? What if each fact in it, which thy superficial sense beholds, is a letter of a Divine word or an adjective of a mystic verse ? And what if thy flippant estimate of the meaning of nature is the child's slow and stuttering spelling-out of Homer's syllables, while the saint's vision of a life and glory all around is the manly reading of the mighty poem of the world?'' Sight and Insight. 189 Insight, therefore, opens the intellectual world of law and harmony beneath the world of physi- cal shows ; within that, the world of beauty ; within that again, the realm of spiritual language. In the human world it shows, deep behind deep, law working in society, controlling politics and shaping the destiny of nations; while, in the individual sphere, it unveils man as the epitome of the universe, clad continually in the electric vesture of his character. Every man, as every animal, has sight; but just according to the scale of his insight is the world he lives in a deep one, an awful one, a mystic and glorious world. We see what is, only as we see into what appears. Out of three roots grows the great tree of nature, truth, beauty, good. The man of science fol- lows up its mighty stem, measures it, and sees its branches in the silver-leaved boughs of the firma- ment. The poet delights in the symmetry of its strength, the grace of its arches, the flush of its fruit. Only to the man with finer eye than both is the secret glory of it unveiled ; for his vision discerns how it is fed and in what air it thrives. To him it is only an expansion of the burning bush on Horeb, seen by the solemn prophet, glowing continually with the presence of Infinite Law and Love, yet standing forever unconsumed. V. HILDEBEAND, THE career of the man who will engage our attention admits us to the heart of the eleventh century ; for his influence was felt pow- erfully in Europe from the year 1040 to 1085. The proper background, therefore, for a knowledge of his life is a conception of the state of civiliza- tion in the early part of the eleventh century, and the relations of that period in the Middle Ages to the centuries before. The " Dark Ages," as we call them, commenced with the sixth century, when Europe was completely disorganized by the settle- ment of the barbarians over the domain of the Roman Empire. There were more than four hundred years of night. The darkness was deep- est at the close of the tenth century, after the empire of Charlemagne had dissolved. Indeed, humanity seemed then in a hopeless condition. A writer of the Middle Ages describes that time as an age that ought to be called " iron," from its fierceness, and " leaden," for its gross wickedness. To understand the condition of Europe, as the year 1000 of our era dawned upon it, you must Hildebrand. 191 form a picture of society destitute of every fea- ture, and seemingly of every force, that belongs to what we consider civilization, that can be thought to make life a privilege, or even tolerable. There was no such thing as education, for there was no literature, no press, no books. There was no science even for the highest classes. For many centuries it had been rare for a layman of whatever rank to know how to sign his name. It was a striking exception when an emperor could read. The Latin language, which held all the treasures of learning, had died out of common use. The ravages of pirates during the previous cen- tury had destroyed many of the libraries of the church. All books were written then, on parch- ments, and they were so costly that only the most princely fortunes could purchase them. And most of therr^ contained nothing more valuable than legends of saints, or homilies, or works of Jerome or Augustine, perhaps written over the noblest treatises of Cicero or Plato. We read that a certain princess in the tenth century, the Countess of Anjou, gave two hundred sheep, a load of wheat, a load of rye, and a load of millet, with several skins of costly fur, for a copy of the sermons of a German monk. Nothing that we generally associate with the Middle Ages as the glory of that period had ap- peared then in Europe. There were no grand cathedrals, for ^Gothic architecture had not yet germinated. There was no scholastic philosophy, 192 Hildebrand. for Abelard was yet a hundred years in futurity. There was no painting, no poetry, and no promise of the Crusades. There were no methods of quick travel ; few good roads from state to state, and such as there were infested by robbers ; of course, therefore, there could be no great commerce ; in fact, there was scarcely any trade. What we un- derstand by government had no existence. Feu- dal fortresses were rising as the prominent features in every landscape, where nobles, who could not spell their names and did not know a letter of the alphabet, revelled in a brutal power, and looked out over the dependent serfs in their miserable huts ; and these barons were somehow aggregated into what was called a kingdom, or an empire. But there was no country then that was organized socially, even so well as any district of Russia is to-day ; and there is no mechanic's family in this city that is not far more richly provided with what we all esteem the comforts of life than the average noblemen of Europe and their households were at the close of the tenth century. Europe, in the earlier portions of the Dark Ages, was morally, to use a geological figure, in the Silurian Epoch, everything insular and irregular, chaotic patches of the future continent swelling out of the sea of barbarous passion, bearing only the lowest types of life. In the Middle Ages it had changed into the ter- tiary period, showing larger organizations, enriched with higher forms, and plainly promising the states, Hildebran