This book is DI^ below UNIVERSITY of CALIFQRNl/i AT LOS ANGELES LIBRARY THE MINIMUM COST OF LIVING THE MACMILLAN COMPANY NEW YORK • BOSTON • CHICAGO ■ DALLAS ATLANTA ■ SAN FRANCISCO MACMILLAN & CO., Limited LONDON • BOMBAY ■ CALCUTTA MELBOURNE THE MACMILLAN CO. OF CANADA, Ltd. TORONTO ;^' 6 THE MINIMUM COST OF LIVING A STUDY OF FAMILIES OF LIMITED INCOME IN NEW YORK CITY BY WINIFRED STUART GIBBS SUPERVISOE HOME ECONOMICS, NEW YORK ASSOCIATION FOR IMPROVING THE CONDITION OF THE POOR, LECTURER IN HOUSEHOLD ARTS, TEACHERS COLI-EGE, COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY, AUTHOR OF " ECONOMICAL COOK- ING," "food for the INVALID AND CONVALESCENT," — ETC., ETC. ^m fnrk THE MACMILLAN COMPANY 1917 All rights reserted . 39343 MAX 1 8 COPTBIOHT, 1917 By the MACMILLAN COMPANY Set up and electrotyped. Published March, 1917. INTRODUCTION One of the chief aims of an organization like the Association for Improving the Condition of the Poor is to help others to help themselves. It is frequently more helpful to teach a given family- how its income can be made to more nearly meet its needs than to supplement their income with relief. This is always the case if their income is sufficient when wisely used to meet their actual necessities although it may not be sufficient even for them unless used wisely with much planning. Perhaps one of the most essential factors in thrift in family expenditures is careful planning. Care- ful planning inevitably means a systematic record of expenditures. Making this record in itself is of the greatest use in developing thrift and lays a firm foundation for profiting from errors in thrift — from hasty poor judgments in expenditures. No corrective is more effective than a record of an unwise expenditure. It was with these thoughts in mind that the vi Introduction Association for Improving the Condition of the Poor developed some two years ago a simple but practical family budget book for the use of families known to the Association over continuous periods of time, that is, families in which the dependency either because of widowhood or of chronic sickness was relatively long continued, usually ending only with the coming to working age of children in these families. The use of this systematic method of recording family expenditures has been most beneficial. An interesting thing about it is the interest which these families themselves take, somewhat contrary to expectation, in keeping the record. Incidentally, much useful information has been collected as to the food habits of families of moderate incomes in New York City. It has seemed worth while to present in some detail the results of this systematic record of family expen- ditures in a typical group of families and to inter- pret these in the light of what it is reasonable to hope can still be accomplished in the direction of education of such families to further increase the usefulness of their income in terms of better food, better clothing and better housing. The assem- bling of this information has been made by Miss Introduction vii Winifred S. Gibbs who has for the past ten years been in charge of the Division of Home Eco- nomics. (Signed) Bailey B. Burritt, General Director, New York Association for Improving the Condition of the Poor. TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE Foreword xiii PART I THE STUDY AS A WHOLE Chapter I Object of the Study 3 Description of the Families 4 Method Employed in Making the Study 5 Data on Which the Study was Based 10 Kind of Records Kept by Teachers 11 Chapter II Discussion of the Estimate of Minimum Require- ment for Rent, Food, Fuel and Light, Clothing, Insurance, Sundries 13 Table of Contents PART II EXPENSE ACCOUNTS OF THE SEVENTY-FIVE FAMILIES PAGE Estimate of Needs One Month and Twelve Months for Each Family 31 Actual Expenses Twelve Months 31 Actual Income Twelve Months 31 Summary 31 PART III WHAT THE STUDY REVEALED Chapter I Living Conditions Before and After the Study 49 Comparison of Living Conditions and of Health Conditions 49 Classification of Families According to Income. 50 Famihes Showing Surplus and Deficit 51 Table of Contents xi Chapter II page Housing Conditions 56 Percentage of Income Spent for Rent 56 Number of Rooms per Family, Private Toilet, etc 57 Classification of Rent According to Number of Rooms 58 Chapter III The Seventy-Five Dietaries in Detail 60 Classification of Food According to Size and Composition of Families 74 Percentage Spent for Food 74 Conmients, Comparisons, Conclusions 75 Chapter IV The Clothing Budget 78 The Study of the Clothing Budget 79 Comments, Difficulties of Standardization, etc. . 81 Chapter V Fuel and Light 86 xii Table of Contents Chapter VI page Incidentals 89 Discussion of Results of Insufficient Provision for the Item 90 Carfares, Insurance 90 FOREWORD In 1906, the Dean of a technical college said to the writer, *'I can find plenty of girls who realize the value of Household Art courses in school, and plenty who teach these courses well. What I want now is someone on the firing line who will show my students how to connect their classroom work with the real questions of the day." The women who did the work on which the present study is based are all on the ''firing line." The work was begun ten years ago by the New York Association for Improving the Condition of the Poor. The first purpose was to give simple lessons in diet and cooking to the mothers of underfed children. These families were all under the care of the Association. It was soon found, however, that in order to do any constructive work and really help the families, the food problem could not be considered independently. As the work developed the family budget as a whole came to be the foundation for all instruction. The dietitian based her diet and cooking lessons on the xiv Foreword food budget; the sewing teacher based hers on the clothing item. The family budgets dealt with in the following pages were, of necessity, on a min- imum basis. The word minimum is used to denote certain results of work done. This work included observation of results for the purpose of determin- ing the lowest sum on which the families could maintain health and working power. This was for the purpose of making best use of the money in hand, and never for the purpose of keeping the families on a low standard. The families were those of widows, who, by reason of the death of the wage earner, had been granted a definite monthly cash allowance. This allowance was based on a carefully planned estimate of needs. Furthermore, the Association hoped by the fixing of such an estimate, and by a record of its working out to be of direct service to other families whose incomes were practically the same as that allowed these famiUes. The results of this experiment are set forth in the following pages. Because of the lack of margin it was necessary to give careful attention to each item so that no one should rob the other. The workers have endeavored to present a piece Foreword xv of work in which the human element should be brought out, but one in which this element should be related definitely to a sound scientific back- ground. Direct good to the families has been the chief aim. It is hoped, however, that the results of this instruction can be so formulated as to be of service to all who are concerned in our present day industrial and social problem. The following field workers have made this study possible: — Mrs. Emma Carter Schultz, Miss Marion Mudge, Miss J. B. F. Parramore, Dr. Bertha F. Johnson, Miss Elisabeth Banks, Miss Margaret Schmidt, Miss Elizabeth Guilford, and Miss Bessie G. Chamberlayne. They have con- tributed unstinted personal service with the families and enthusiastic professional cooperation in the division. The writer extends grateful acknowledgments to Professor Henry C. Sherman and Professor Robert E. Chaddock of Columbia University and to Dr. C. F. Langworthy, Department of Agricul- ture, Washington, D. C, for helpful criticisms and suggestions. W. S. G. PART I THE STUDY AS A WHOLE THE MINIMUM COST OF LIVING A STUDY OF FAMILIES OF LIMITED INCOME IN NEW YORK CITY CHAPTER I Object of the Study From Sir William Petty in 1672 to Dr. Robert Coit Chap in in 1906, each study of the family budget has made its own contribution to the sum of human well-being. The earlier workers under- took these studies primarily that the resulting data might be used to improve social conditions. Their viewpoint was the broadly social, and contact with individual families ceased when the families had contributed the necessary information. Further- more, much of the field work was done by those whose interest ended when the actual gathering of data was completed. The present study was also begun in the hope of making a contribution that might help to im- prove social conditions. The immediate plan, how- ever, was to so far improve family groups that they might become stronger units in the future. Those 4 The Minimum Cost of Living in charge of the work had a decided advantage over their predecessors in that their field workers were women specially fitted by training and inter- ests for the doing of such work. Expense accounts were collected from one hun- dred and fifty families, but in order to make the study concise seventy-five were chosen for pres- entation. These seventy-five families are typical of the income groups represented in this study. Briefly, the families reported upon fall into the following groups according to size : 3 families — widow and two children 26 " tliree 19 " four 15 " five 5 " six 6 " seven 1 family " eight According to nationality they form the following groups: American 19 English 1 German 17 Italian 5 Irish 28 Scandinavian 2 Austrian 1 Bohemian 2 The function of the Home Economics work of the Association is fundamentally educational. Its Method Employed in Making the Study 5 aim is to establish each family on the basis of a seK-sustaining unit. Therefore, the results of the present study are presented as nearly as possible from the standpoint of the normal. METHOD EMPLOYED IN MAKING THE STUDY For the first few years budgets were kept in a very informal way, but in each case they were used as a basis for the lessons planned. In 1914 sys- tematic budget keeping was begun in the families of more or less fixed income. By means of these expense books the women have learned to view their home problems as a whole. They have been trained to accurate thinking and to accurate ex- pression. They have learned habits of thrift from the mere record on paper of their expenditure. Finally, they have had the advantage of comparing the records and results of bad dietary habits with good, and have learned in the same way to re- organize their expenditures for the other items of the budget. The Association cares nothing for tables of statistics that stop at tabulation. The tabulations must point backward to some good accomplished and onward to possible increased good in the 6 The Minimum Cost of Living future. Dr. Chapin has said that in compiHng results of such work: "Both the intensive and the extensive methods are valuable and should supple- ment each other. With the extensive method to give breadth and perspective, and the intensive study to give color and definiteness to the outlines obtained by the extensive method, the study of the family budget can best be made to bring out 'the standard of living.'" In formulating a plan of work, in each family the workers collected information and made plans somewhat as follows: Summary of the economic situation in each family: Instruction in budget making. Instruction m carrying out the budget planned. Plan of dietary needed by individual family. Plan of clothing needs. Lessons in cooking. Lessons in sewing. The first step in getting this information was to hold a friendly conference with the housekeeper. Few of the women were accustomed to ''taking Method Employed in Making the Study 7 account of stock." A clear statement of the family resources was followed by careful instruc- tion as to how best to divide the income. One point should be emphasized — the women were to a large extent given freedom of choice, the expense accounts being controlled only by advice. Someone has called a budget a ''financial prophecy." The women in the present group were taught that to make a budget meant to forecast a future of improved health and freedom from the wear and tear of a hand-to-mouth existence. The word ''food" came to stand for something besides the unpaid grocery bill. "Clothing" began to fulfill its chief mission — that of helping to con- serve the family self-respect and happiness. In short, the housekeepers learned to adjust their expenditures so that the account books were genuine human documents. The advance from their customary slipshod methods to systematic adjustment was not made in a day. Slowly and patiently housekeeper and teacher worked together. The progress was slow but the results satisfactory. One of the women had never learned simple addition. In her zeal to have a satisfactory expense book she taught her- 8 The Minimum Cost of Living self to add. Her method at first was to group all the figures of the same denomination together, make separate additions of each group and then to arrive at the grand total by a process equally intricate. The women were taught to care for the chil- dren's food needs first. It was not always easy to convince them of the necessity for this, since busy, tired mothers were apt to say — ''The children must take just what we do." Instruction there- fore included planning of a dietary which would fill the children's needs and satisfy the adults' tastes without undue elaboration of cooking proc- esses. From the beginning the teachers realized that the clothing budget must be very carefully planned. Necessarily the sum fixed was somewhat meagre. It was felt, however, that a carefully administered clothing allowance would do much to increase the general morale of the family. As in the case of food a slipping to a low standard in matters of dress came almost invariably from fatigue, ill health and the resulting loss of desire and power to think and plan. The direct influence of neat and suitable clothing can hardly be over- Method Employed in Making the Study 9 estimated. It is perhaps in this item that the lack of margin in the budget was most keenly felt. Practically all of the families, however, were recipients of gifts of clothing from friends and relatives at various times throughout the year, which served somewhat to supplement the amount allowed for this item. As is the case with most mothers, nearly all of these women sacrificed their own tastes and comfort in clothing so that the children might be neatly and attractively dressed. These lessons were used as one of the means to the end of family upbuilding. The cooking les- sons were planned with the food item in the budg- et as a basis. The sewing lessons bore a similar relation to the clothing item. Before the granting of the cash allowance ex- pense accounts were simply records of daily pur- chases. When the form was made up for the present expense books experience of former years was the chief deciding factor. It was felt that the budget page must do more than afford a place for record of expenses. This page in order to be of the greatest use must show an analysis of purchases, so that the dietitians could see at a glance whether the family was having too much or too little of any >■ 3 ; -4 — 3 E 1 ^ 1 ll 1 1 1 ^ 1 1 Money Wagts 1 ^ i 1 1 I > i ^ 1 Q S 1 . 1 § S i «^ s .s Q > I i i 1 I ! n I 1 if 1 i i m B. ii i IM J ] m .. I i s i \ i s o g 3 } 1 \ Inll < i 1 l3 1 \ , |S 5J liJ \ S III* I fMn I . HI mii J 1 1 { 1 1 i 1 j 3 ® 1 ■3 1 1 ^ 1 s 1 3 1 < i i < 1 1 III 1 1 -'II I z 1 s 1 1 2 1 5 1 1 = 1 1 f 1 1 1 s 8 < 1 1 1 i H 1 i ^ 1 1 < s 1 1 1 i 5 J a 12 The Minimum Cost of Living one food. The sewing teacher must be able to decide as to whether the clothing allowance was being wisely spent. Inevitably such a page must require much detail work. The accompanying form has been in successful use for two years. The housekeepers have a separate set of loose leaves fastened together with brown paper covers for each month. This provides an easy way for check- ing the transfer of the surplus or deficit as the case may be, to the book for the following month. The aim was to draw up a form of record that would show just what were the needs in each family from a home economics standpoint, what instruction was given and what were the results. The present sheet is now in use in many homes, and gives a satisfactory picture of each family for the year. The rise or fall of the dietary from month to month, the fluctuations of the income and the record of instruction give data that is valuable far beyond the limits of the home in which it is gathered. CHAPTER II The Estimate of Minimum Requirement Obviously such an estimate was necessary by way of beginning, but it was equally true that the workers must keep an open mind towards the weaknesses as they developed in their own es- timates. Furthermore, they must strive for flexibility so that these standards might prove guides rather than hampering boundaries. In this preliminary discussion only the main consideration governing the estimate will be set forth. The theoretical '4deal division" of the economists is of value only as a starting point, since it is not practical to follow it in detail. Ideal Division Operating "Higher Income Rent Food Expenses Clothing Life" $800-1000 20% or 30% or 10% or 15% or 25% or $160 to $200 $240 to $300 $85 to $100 $120 to $150 $200 to $250 With the above estimate in mind it may be of interest to trace the actual possibilities of an in- come of $800 to $1000 in New York City. 13 14 The Minimum Cost of Living Practical Division Education Operating Recreation & Income Rent Food Expenses Clothing Sundries Saving $800-1000 average $150 $290-390 $39.00 fuel & $120-190 $48-78 Nothing, light left when 48 . 00 sundries sundries and 12 . 00 insurance emergencies 93 . 00 carfare & have been lunches provided for. $192.00 total Providing the breadwinner worked continuously this would leave slender provision for the in- numerable unexpected needs that arise in every household, not to mention recreation and savings. As a matter of fact, every working year has many grievous breaks. Illness and strikes and holidays and ''slack times" are a few of the factors to be reckoned with. Fortunately those who live in Greater New York have the opportunity for much healthful recreation at little or no cost. We hear much of "living standards" — but the vital spark of such a standard cannot be expressed in figures. One must be in contact with the daily lives of the families in order to appreciate the ad- vance from discouragement to ambition. Only in this way can the figures express the good which has actually come to the homes. The Estimate of Minimum Requirement 15 The chief items in the estimate will now be con- sidered in detail. Shelter Housing conditions in the poorer districts of New York City are characterized by a dreary sameness. On into the miles run streets of sordid tenements. Each of these tenements looks much like its neighbors, the chief difference being that one house may have three stories and another four; one may open into a court at the side, while still another may boast, '^AU Hght rooms." This question of shelter had been largely settled by the families themselves before the study began. It was understood that they had decided this ques- tion by securing the home neighborhood for the maximum of — shall we say negative comfort? — to be had for the amount within their means. The rent item was estimated at $12.00 monthly for an ''average family" of five. This gave fairly comfortable quarters and allowed "IK persons to a room." Food The ration allowance used in this study was the standard one worked out for A. I. C. P. famihes. 16 The Minimum Cost of Living In standardizing this allowance it was necessary to consider a large group of families, and to so express the results as to give figures that could be used by staff members outside the Home Econom- ics Division. Obviously it was not practical to formulate a dietary every detail of which could be followed. Therefore, the ration allowance was based on the accepted dietary standards of Pro- fessor Atwater, estimating the needs of the various members of each family according to the age factors proposed by Atwater and used by the Department of Agriculture. The table of units for making up food needs in each family is as follows : Table of Units Man (17 years and over) 1 . Woman (16 years and over) 8 Boy 16 years 9 " 12 years-13 years, inclusive 8 " 10 Girl 14 " 10 Child 6 " 2 -11 -15 -13 - 9 - 5 " under 2 years 3 Professor Atwater's calculations were based on a standard that called for 3,500 calories per unit per The Estimate of Minimum Requirement 17 day. This meant a man at moderate muscular work. In fixing the food standard for all families in the Association certain things were taken into account. For instance, frequently the man was not employed, or was in ill health. Many of the famihes were widows' families. Nevertheless in all families the needs of a man were taken as the unit. The unit standard adopted for A. I. C. P. famihes was 3,000 calories per unit per day. This gave an allowance that might be called an adequate minimum on which to base the needs of women and children. It was not practical to have a changing unit standard for each family. It was thought safe in the practical working out of the dietaries to use the Atwater scale in spite of the fact that the unit basis was 3,000 calories and not 3,500. The ration allowance made up from this plan was used with excellent results for eight years before the beginning of the study. The bills-of-fare possible were fairly satisfactory from the point of view of attractive variety. To administer the food allowance properly meant careful buying, much thought in combining the foods and great care in their preparation. During 18 The Minimum Cost of Living the time of the study this diet could be purchased at the rate of twenty-seven cents per unit per day. At the present writing, October 1, 1916, the same diet would cost thirty-four cents per unit per day. The following diet is the basic one for the average family. Calculations for increase accord- ing to the size of family are made with these figures as , the starting point. It is understood that the prices quoted varied slightly according to locality and season. Ration Allowance, 2 Adults, 3 Children — One Week Food Lbs. Cost Cal. Pro. P2O5 CaO Fe Acid Base Beef 1 Soup [...4 S.80 3572 303 6.969 0.2274 0.04545 151.5 Meat I Codfish 1 .12 515 125 3.150 0.1890 0.00504 53.0 Eggs Id. .35 892 81 2.141 0.5352 0.01695 67.8 Butterine..l .25 5115 8 0.204 0.1534 Milk 14qt3. 1.26 8792 419 26.640 21.0129 0.02989 228. Cheese V2 .12 997 65 3.230 2.4925 12.9 Bread 12 .48 14068 506 10 . 566 1 . 5497 . 04226 380 . Macaroni.. 1 .08 1624 60 1.624 0.1624 0.00550 43.8 Rice 1 broken .06 1591 36 0.907 0.0477 0.00477 43.0 Oatmeal... 3 .10 5049 227 11.683 1.6230 0.04868 162.3 Sugar 3M -28 6349 Beans 2 .20 3128 204 10.197 1.9706 0.06256 156.4 Carrots 4 .12 636 16 1.400 1.0684 0.01018 152.0 Onions 4 .12 796 25 1.910 0.9552 0.00876 24.3 Potatoes.. 15 .45 4560 122 7.570 0.8664 0.06840 403.2 Apples 4 .12 856 6 0.428 0.1883 0.00428 51.2 Tomatoes.. 1 .05 103 5 0.0265 0.0890 0.00175 35.0 Prunes 2 .16 2322 16 1.856 0.4644 0.02090 185.8 Cocoa 14 .13 1128 49 2.482 0.3046 0.00564 1.6 Tea Vi .10 Coffee J^ .12 Dates 1 .10 1416 9 0.425 0.4243 0.00146 97.0 5.57 63509 22S2 93.4085 34.3250 0.38247 914.3 1334.5 The Estimate of Minimum Requirement 19 No. of units 3 Cost per unit per month ....$8.19 " " family per week ... . 5.57 "day 81 " " unit " " 27 Since the budget calculations are usually made by the month the following table has been ar- ranged on a monthly basis. This table is based upon the ration quoted above. The quantities of food are of course approximate since it would not be practical to weigh each portion. These tables do give, however, the same well-balanced ration as that described in the beginning of this chapter. Ration Allowances — One Month 1 Adult and 2 Children 1 Adult and 4 Children 2 Adults and 3 Children 1 " "3 2 " "1 2 " 2 1 " 4 4 5 S 1 Adult and 6 Children 1 Adult and 7 Children 1 Adult and 8 Children 2 " "4 2 " 5 1 " 9 2 .. g 2 " 2 " 7 8 Food Amount Amount Amount Amount Amount Amount Bread. ..34. 66 lbs. 39.44 lbs. 52.00 lbs. 62.83 lbs. 73.66 lbs. 98.21 lbs. Butter . . 6.49 " 6.49 " 6.49 " 8.66 " 8.66 " 10.82 " Milk 60.62qts. 60.62 qts. 60.62 qts. 90.93 qts. 90.93 qts. 90.93 qts. Eggs .... 4 . 33 doz. 4.33 doz. 4.33 doz. 6.49 doz. 8.66 doz 8.66 doz. Cereal . .12.99 lbs. 17.32 lbs. 21.65 lbs. 25.98 lbs. 28.14 lbs. 28.14 lbs. Tea, Coffee and Cocoa . . 3 . 24 " 4.33 " 5.41 " 5.41 " 5.41 " 6.49 " Sugar. . .14.07 " 15.15 " 15.15 " 20.56 " 24.89 " 29.22 " Meat .. .14.07 " 17.32 " 22.19 " 17.32 " 22.73 " 27.06 " Pot 43.3 " 51.96 " 64.95 " 69.28 " 77.94 " 90.93 " Veg 51.96 •' 51.96 " 47.63 " 64.95 " 82.27 " 95.26 " Fruit . . .23.81 " 25.98 " 30.31 " 47.63 " 60.62 " 69.28 " 20 The Minimum Cost of Living Anyone who has had experience in working with the tenement population knows how intimate a connection exists between food and the more com- mon diseases of poverty. Among our seventy-five famines, before the granting of the allowance, record after record reads — ''Children anaemic," ''Mother suffering from malnutrition." Because of this, special care has been taken with the dietary, and part two will set forth the results. Table for Converting Unit Needs into Dollars and Cents Cost per month at Cost per month at Units 0.27 per day Units $.30 per day 1.0 $ 8.19 1.0 % 9.10 1.1 9.00 1.1 10.01 1.2 9.83 1.2 10.92 1.3 10.65 1.3 11.63 1.4 11.47 1.4 12.74 1.5 12.29 1.5 13.65 1.6 13.10 1.6 14.56 1.7 13.93 1.7 15.47 1.8 14.74 1.8 16.38 1.9 15.56 1.9 17.29 2.0 16.38 2.0 18.20 2.1 17.20 2.1 19.11 2.2 18.02 2.2 20.02 2.3 18.84 2.3 20.93 2.4 19.66 2.4 21.84 2.5 20.48 2.5 22.75 2.6 21.29 2.6 23.66 2.7 22.11 2.7 24.57 The Estimate of Minimum Requirement 21 Cost per month at Cost per month at Units $.27 per day Units $.30 per day 2.8 22.93 2.8 $25.48 2.9 23.75 2.9 26.39 3.0 24.57 3.0 27.30 3.1 25.39 3.1 28.21 3.2 26.21 3.2 29.12 3.3 27.02 3.3 30.03 3.4 27.85 3.4 30.94 3.5 28.67 3.5 31.85 3.6 29.48 3.6 32.76 3.7 30.30 3.7 33.67 3.8 31.12 3.8 34.58 3.9 31.94 3.9 35.49 4.0 32.76 4.0 38.40 4.1 33.58 4.1 37.31 4.2 34.40 4.2 38.22 4.3 35.22 4.3 29.13 4.4 36.04 4.4 40.04 4.5 36.86 4.5 40.95 4.6 37.67 4.6 41.86 4.7 38.49 4.7 42.77 4.8 39.31 4.8 43.68 4.9 40.13 4.9 44.59 5.0 40.95 5.0 45.50 5.1 41.77 5.1 46.41 5.2 42.59 5.2 47.32 5.3 43.41 5.3 48.23 5.4 44.23 5.4 49.14 5.5 45.05 5.5 50.05 5.6 45.86 5.6 50.98 5.7 46.68 5.7 51.87 5.8 47.50 5.8 52.78 5.9 48.32 5.9 53.69 22 The Minimum Cost of Living Cost per month at Cost per month at Units $.27 per day Units $.30 per day 6.0 49.14 ....6.0... $54.60 6.1 49.96 ....6 .1. . 55.51 6.2 50.76 6 ....6 .2. .3. . 56.42 6.3 51.60 57.33 6.4 52.42 ....6 .4. . 58.24 6.5 53.24 ....6 .5. . 59.15 6.6 54.05 6 6 60.06 6.7 54.87 6 7 60.97 6.8 55.69 ....6 6, .8. . , 9 61.88 6.9 56.51 62.79 7.0 57.33 ....7, .0. . 63.70 7.1 58.15 ....7, .1. . 64.61 7.2 58.97 ....7, .2. . 65.52 7.3 59.79 7 3 66 43 7.4 60.61 ....7 .4. . 67.34 7.5 61.45 ....7, .5. . 68.25 7.6 62.24 . . . .7 .6. . 69.16 7.7 63.06 7, 7 70.07 7.8 63.88 7, 8 70.98 7.9 64.70 ....7, .9. .. 71.69 8.0 65.52 ....8, 0. . . 72.90 8.1 66.34 ....8 ,1. . 73.71 8.2 67.16 ....8. .2. . , 74.62 8.3 67.98 ....8, 3. . . 75.33 8.4 68.60 ....8, 4. . . 76.44 8.5 69.62 ....8. 5. . . 77.35 8.6 70.43 8 6 78.26 8.7 71.25 8. 7 79.17 8.8 72.07 8, 8 80 . 08 8.9 72.89 ....8. ,9. . . 80.99 The Estimate of Minimum Requirement 23 Fuel and Light Information was also sought on this item and an average of all the neighborhoods of the city showed that a tenement apartment of three rooms could be heated and lighted at the rate of $3.25 per month, provided the problem were viewed by the year. According to season it would read something like this: Winter $5.00 to $6.00 Spring and Autumn $2 . 50 to $3 . 50 Midsummer $2.00 In estimating needs for this item this allowance was not increased as the size of the apartments increased, since most of the families made constant use of only three rooms, even though they might possess more. Clothing The clothing needs were difficult to decide upon. It is obviously not an easy thing to standardize clothing. During the previous five years, however, there has been in the informal budgets kept by the women much light thrown upon this subject. The tentative sum fixed upon was $2.00 per in- dividual per month. It was understood that this 24 The Minimum Cost of Living would provide sufficient clothing only on condition that the mother would have time and strength as well as ability to do her own sewing and mending. It will be understood that the clothing division suggested below is far from satisfying the workers. It is merely an attempt to make the best possible use of a necessarily small clothing allowance. The final figures are based largely on actual practice. The most casual observer will see at once that there is no provision for the small but necessary accessories of dress. The annual clothing allowance for man, woman and four children is as follows: man, $30.20; woman, $28.75; boy 14, $26.05; girl 12, $22.25; girl 6, $17.85; girl 3, $10.75. The following division of this allowance is quoted from ''Clothing the Family," by Mary A. Ditmas. Mrs. Ditmas while sewing teacher of the division did some intensive work in clothing budgets. DIVISION OF CLOTHING ALLOWANCE FOR MAN, WOMAN AND 4 CHILDREN Man 1 suit $10.00 1 pair trousers 2 . 00 2 light shirts at $.75 each 1 . 50 3 colored shirts at $.75 each 2 . 25 2 pairs shoes 5 . 00 8 pairs hose at $.15 a pau- 1 . 20 The Estimate of Minimum Requirement 25 Underwear: Winter, 2 suits at $1.00 each $2.00 Summer, 3 suits at $.75 each 2.50 2 hats 1.75 1 necktie 25 1 pair suspenders 25 4 collars 50 2 sets sleeping garments 1 .00 Total $30.20 Clothing for Woman — One Year Shoes, 2 pairs, $2.50 each $ 5.00 Repairs 1 . 25 Aprons, 3 (homemade) 45 Hats, Winter hat 1.50 Summer hat 1 . 25 Coats, Winter, 1 3.00 Summer, 1 2.00 Dresses, 2 wash dresses (homemade) 2 . 00 2 house dresses (homemade) 1 . 50 Skirts, 1 woolen 2 .00 Waists, 2 wash waists (homemade) 1 .00 Hosiery, 6 pairs 60 Gloves, 1 pair cotton 25 1 pair woolen 75 Underwear: Winter, three union suits, $.75 each 2.25 Summer, three union suits, $.25 each 75 2 corset covers (homemade) 75 2 flannelette skirts (homemade) 50 2 night dresses (homemade) 70 1 pair corsets 1 . 00 Linen 50 Total $28.75 26 The Minimum Cost of Limig Girl of Twelve Years Shoes, 2 pair at $2.00 .....$ 4.00 Repairs 1 . 25 1 pair rubbers 65 Gloves, 2 pair woolen at $.25 50 Hats, Winter (trimmed at home) 1 .00 Summer (trimmed at home) 75 Coats, Winter 2.50 Summer 1 . 00 Sweater (homemade) 1 . 25 Dresses, one woolen dress 1 . 50 3 wash dresses (homemade) (at $.50) 1 .50 Skirts, 1 woolen skirt (homemade) 1.00 Waists, 2 middy blouses (homemade) 75 Hosiery, 6 pair at $.10 60 Underwear: Winter, 3 union suits at $.50 1 . 50 Summer, 3 union suits at $.10 30 2 flannelette skirts (homemade) 80 2 night dresses (homemade) 60 2 white muslin petticoats (homemade) 30 Ribbons, etc 50 Total $22.25 Boy of Fourteen Years Overcoats, winter, one coat $ 4 . 50 One sweater 1 .00 Hats, two 75 Suits, one 2 . 50 Trousers, 3 wash trousers 1 . 50 One woolen trouscr 75 Blouses, 4 cotton (homemade) at $.20 80 3 outing blouses 1 . 50 Gloves, 1 pair 25 Hosiery, 12 pairs stockings 1 . 20 The Estimate of Minimum Requirement 27 Shoes, 3 pairs at SI. 75 $ 5.25 Repairs 2 . 00 Rubbers 60 Underwear: Summer, 3 suits at $.25 75 Winter, 3 suits at $.75 2 .25 Underbodies (homemade) 45 Total $26.05 Girl op Six Years Shoes, 2 pairs at $1.25 $ 2.50 Repairs 1.25 Rubbers 60 Gloves, 2 pairs woolen at $.25 50 Hats, 1 felt (trimmed at home) 75 1 summer (trimmed at home) 50 Coats, winter (made at home) 1 . 75 Summer (made at home) 1 . 00 Sweater (made at home) 50 Dresses, 2 woolen (homemade) 1 . 50 4 wash dresses (homemade) 1 . 75 Hosiery, 6 pairs at $.10 60 Underwear, 3 underwaists (homemade) 35 Winter, 3 union suits at $.50 1 . 50 Summer, 3 shirts 30 4 pairs muslin drawers (homemade) 60 2 flannelette skirts (homemade) 50 2 cotton petticoats 50 2 nightgowns 40 Ribbons 50 Total $17.85 Girl of Three Years Shoes, 2 pairs at $1.25 $ 2.50 Repairs 75 Hats, 2 caps at $.25 50 28 The Minimum Cost of Living Suits or dresses: 4 wash suits or dresses (homemade) $ 1 . 50 4 pairs rompers (homemade) 60 Coats, 1 winter 2 . 00 1 summer (homemade) 1 .00 Hosiery, 4 pairs stockings 40 Underwear, 3 winter union suits at $.25 75 3 summer union suits at $.15 45 2 nightgowns (homemade) 30 Total $10.75 SUNDRIES The workers realized that the provision possible for this item would be inadequate. The amount finally fixed was $1.00 each for the first three mem- bers of the family per month, and fifty cents each for each additional person. This provided only for the barest necessities. This item had also to in- clude provision for insurance. The Association advocates insurance only for the breadwinner. Most of the families, however, make payments for children's insurance. PART II THE SEVENTY-FIVE EXPENSE ACCOUNTS IN DETAIL The figures on the following pages give the main items in the budget, and the actual expenditures for these items in each family. The estimate spoken of has been slightly modified to meet individual needs. The estimate for sundries at the time the study was made was $2.00 per family per month. The increase according to size of family came later. The sum paid for insurance by each family has been added to the estimate for sundries. When the $2.00 rate was in use it was understood that special needs must be provided for through some other source. Expense Accounts of the Seventy-five Families 31 YEARLY SUMMARY OF SEVENTY-FIVE BUDGETS Est. of needs Act. Exp. Act. Inc. Act, over Act. under 1 mo. 12 mo. 12 mo. 12 mo. budget budget Summary Family No. 1, Woman, 2 children, 13, 8 Rent free free free . . .$386.00 Food 17.33.. 207.96.. 289.48 $81.52 F. &L.... 3.25.. 39.00.. 24.24 $14.76..BaI. end Clo 6.00.. 72.00.. 29.82 42. 18. .of 12 mo. Sund 3.30.. 39.60.. 40.90 1.30 $1.56 $29.88. .$358.56. .$384.44. .$386.00. .$82.82. .$56.94 Family No. 2, Woman, 2 children, 11, 5 Rent $13.00. .$156.00. .$156.00. .$520.33 Food 17.33.. 207.96.. 240.89 $32.93 F.&L 3.25.. 39.00.. 17.15 $21.85 Clo 6.00.. 72.00.. 33.83 38.17. .Bal. end Sund 3.07.. 36.84.. 61.29 24.45 of 12 mo. Baby'sBd 2.30 2.30 $8.87 $42.65. .$511.80. .$511.46. .$520.33. .$59.68. .$60.02 Family No. 3, Woman, 2 children, 15, 11 Rent free free free $269.96 Food $17.33. .$209.96. .$193.18 $16.78 F.&L 3.25.. 39.00.. 43.21 $4.21 Bal. end Clo 6.00.. 72.00.. 15.89 56. 11. .of 12 mo. Sund 3.00.. 36.00.. 15.16 20.84. .$2.52 $29.58. .$356.96. .$267.44. .$269.96. .$ 4.21. .$93.73 Family No. 4, Woman, 3 children, 10, 9, 6 Rent $13.00. .$156.00. .$156.05. .$569.11. .$ .05 Food 18.02.. 216.24.. 286.70 70.46 F.&L 3.25.. 39.00.. 41.36 2.36 Bal. end Clo 8.00.. 96.00.. 39.97 $56.03. .of 12 mo. Sund 5.00.. 39.60.. 42.19 2.59 $2.84 $47.27. .$546.84. .$566.27. .$569.11. .$75.46. .$56.03 Family No. 5, Woman, 3 children, 9, 6, 4 Rent $12.00. .$144.00. .$150.00. .$483.68. .$ 6.00 Food 17.33.. 207.96.. 187.36 $20.60 F.&L 3.25.. 39.00.. 29.19 9. 81.. Bal. end Clo 6.00.. 72.00.. 60.39 11.61. .of 12 mo. Sund 3.73.. 44.76.. 49.16 4.40 $7.58 $42.31. .$507.72. .$476.10. .$483.68. .$10.40. .$42.02 32 The Minimum Cost of Living Est. of needs Act. Exp. Act. Inc. 1 mo. IS mo. 12 mo. 12 mo. Family No. 6, Woman, 3 children, 8, 6, 4 Rent $10.00. .$120.00. .$120.00. .$515.61 Food 18.07.. 210.84. F. &L.... 3.25.. 39.00. Clo 8.00.. 96.00. Sund 4.39.. 52.68. Act. over Act. under budget budget Summary 256.05 $39.21 27.19 $11.81..Bal. end 47.37 48.63. .of 12 mo. 64.95 12.27 $.05 $43.71. .$524.52. .$515.56. .$515.61. .$51.48. .$60.44 Family No. 7, Woman, 3 children, 8, 6, 4 Rent $10.00. .$120.00. .$122.00. .$602.44. .$ 2.00. Food . 17.20. 206.40. F. &L... . 3.25. 39.00. Clo . 8.00. 96.00. Sund.... . 5.25. 63.00. 219.72 13.32 31.77 $ 7.23. .Bal. end 47.06 48.94. .of 12 mo. 134.49 71.49 $47.40 $43.70. .$524.40. .$555.04. .$602.44. .$86.81. .$56.17 Family No. 8, Woman, 3 children, 17, 11, 5 Rent $11.00. .$132.00. .$151.00. .$701.36. .$19.00. Food . . . . . 27.85. . 334.20 F. &L.. .. 3.25. . 39.00 Clo . . 10.00. . 120.00 Sund . . . . . 7.68. . 92.16 $59.78. .$717.36 307 . 08 $26 . 52 16.85 22. 15.. Bal. end 79.53 40.47. .of 12 mo. 126.05 34.49 $19.65 .$681. 71.. $701. 36.. $53. 49. .$89. 14 Family No. 9, Woman, 3 children, 14, 10, 8 Rent $12.00. .$144.00. .$135.00. .$535.03 $ 9.00. Food . . F. &L. Clo. . . . Sund.. 20.27.. 3.25.. 8.00.. 3.47.. 243.24., 39.00. 96.00. 41.64.. 220.76 22.46 32.59 0.41.. Bal. end 43.54 52. 46.. of 12 mo. 79.90 $38.26 $23.22 $46.99. .$563.88. .$511.81. .$535.03. .$38.26. .$90.33 Family No. 10, Woman, 3 children, 11, 8, 6 Rent $16. 00.. $192. 00.. S1S4. 00.. $594. 46 $ 8.00. Food . . . . . 18.84. . 220.08. F. &L.. .. 3.25. . 39.00. Clo. . . . . . 8.00. . 96.00. Sund . . . . . 3.38. . 40.56. $49.47. .$593.64. 291.49 $65.41 28.31 10. 69.. Bal. end 35.18 60. 82.. of 12 mo. 47.27 6.71 $8.21 .$586.25. .$594. 46.. $72. 12.. $79. 51 Expense Accounts of the Seventy-five Families 33 Est. of needs Act. Exp. Act. Inc. Act. over Act. under 1 mo. 12 mo. 12 mo. 12 mo. budget budget Summary Family No. 11, Woman, 3 children, 11, 10, 5 Rent $ 8.00..$ 96.00..$ 84.00. .$491.05 $12.00 Food 21.84.. 262.08.. 259.35 2.72 F. &L 3.25.. 39.00.. 33.61 5.39..Bal. end Clo 8.00.. 96.00.. 57.13 38.87. .of 12 mo. Sund 2.91.. 34.92.. 56.28 $21.36 $.68 $44.00. .$528.00. .$490.37. .$491.05. .$21.36. .$58.98 Family No. 12, Woman, 3 children, 8, 6, 4 Rent $13.00. .$156.00. .$156.00. .$572.27 Food 20.02.. 240.24.. 261.47 $21.23 F. &L 3.25.. 39.00.. 30.40 $8.60..Bal. end Clo 8.00.. 96.00.. 72.91 23.09. .of 12 mo. Sund 3.60.. 43.20.. 51.24 8.04 $.25 $47.87. .$572.02. .$572.02. .$572.27. .$29.27. . $31.69 Family No. 13, Woman, 3 children, 12, 10, 7 Rent $21.00. .$252.00. .$252.00 . .$731.48 Food 20.48.. 245.76.. 336.11 $90.35 F.&L 3.25.. 39.00.. 35.83 $3.27..Bal. end Clo 8.00.. 96.00.. 48.00 48.00. .of 12 mo. Sund 3.95.. 47.40.. 56.21 8.81 $3.33 $56. 68. .$680. 16.. $728. 15.. $731. 48.. $99. 16.. $51. 27 Family No. 14, Woman, 3 children, 12, 10, 7 Rent $18. 00.. $216. 00.. $216. 00.. $711. 14 Food 20.48.. 245.76.. 313.76 $68.00 F.&L 3.25.. 39.00.. 36.85 $2.15 Clo 8.00.. 96.00.. 63.45 32. 55.. Hal. end Sund 2.00.. 24.00.. 38.50 14.50 of 12 mo. C. F 3.90.. 46.80.. 35.80 11. 00.. $6. 78 $55.63. .$667.56. .$704.36. .$711.14. .$82.50. .$45.70 Family No. 15, Woman, 3 children, 10, 9, 3 Rent $11. 00.. $132. 00. .$1.32.00 .. $516.16 Food . 22.11., 265.32. F.&L... . 3.25.. 39.00 Clo ,. 8.00., , 96.00 Sund. ... . 2.00.. 24.00, 259.24 $ 6.08 32.81 6. 19.. Hal. end 53.44 42.56. .of 12 mo. 32.66 $ 8.66 $6.01 $46.36. .$556.32. .$510. 15.. $516. 16..$ 8.66. «?^4.83 34 The Minimum Cost of Living Est. of needs Act. Exp. Act. Inc. Act. over Act. under 1 mo. 12 mo. 12 mo. 12 mo. budget budget Summary Family No. 16, Woman, 3 children, 12, 8, 6 Rent $13.00. .$156.00. .$143.00. .$642.86 $13.00 Food 28.21.. 338.52.. 306.51 32.01 F. &L 3.25.. 39.00.. 32.55 6.45 Clo 8.00.. 96.00.. 56.53 39.47. .Bal. end Sund 3.66.. 43.92.. 63.72 $19.80 of 12 mo. C. F 4.60.. 55.20.. 31.25 23,95. .$9.30 $60. 72.. $728. 64.. $633. 56.. $642. 86.. $19. 80. $114. 85 Family No. 17, Woman, 3 children, 10, 8, 5 .$ 84. 00.. $503. 29 $84.00 . 270.10 $53.86 . 36.23 2. 77.. Bal. end . 57.97 38.03. .of 12 mo. . 44.53 2.53 • $10.46 Rent . . . ..$14.00. .$108.00. Food. .. . . 18.02. . 216.24. F.&L.. . . 3.25. . 39.00. Clo . . 8.00. . 96.00. Sund . . . . . 3.50. . 42.00. $46. 77.. $561. 24. .$492.83. .$503.29. .$56. 39. $124. 80 Family No. 18, Woman, 3 children, 14, 11, 4 Rent $10.00. .$120.00. .$ 99.25. .$406.25 $20.75 Food 19.66.. 235.92.. 230.62 5.30 F.&L 3.25.. 39.00.. 39.77 $ .77 Bal. end Clo 8.00.. 96.00.. 54.74 41.26. .of 12 mo. Sund 2.00.. 24.00.. 30.42 6.42 $11.45 $42.91. .$514.92. .$454.80. .$466.25. .$ 7.19. .$67.31 Family No. 19, Woman, 3 children, 12, 10, 9 Rent $13.00. .$156.00. .$149.50. .$526.65 $ 6.50 Food 18.44.. 221.28.. 241.29 $20.01 F.&L.... 3.25.. 39.00.. 24.81 14. 19.. Bal. end Clo 8.00.. 96.00.. 57.35 38.65. .of 12 mo. Sund 2.65.. 31.80.. 42.51 10.71 $11.19 $45.34. .$544.08. .$515.40. .$526.65. .$30.72. .$59.34 Family No. 20, Woman 3 children, 11, 9, 6, Rent $ 1.00..$ 12.00..$ 12.00. .$494.61 Food 18.02.. 216.24.. 290.00 $73.76 F.&L 3.25.. 39.00.. 36.90. .^ $2. 10. .Bal. end Clo 8.00.. 96.00.. 65.05 30.95. .of 12 mo. Sund 3.73.. 44.76.. 75.25 30.49 $15.41 $34. 00.. $408. 00.. $479. 20. .$494.01 .$104.25. .$33.05 Expense Accounts of the Seventy-five Families 35 Est. of needs Act. Exp. Act. Inc. Act. over Act. under 1 mo. 12 mo. 12 mo. 12 mo. budget budget Summary Family No. 21, Woman, 3 children, 14, 11, 8 .$111. 00.. $554. 63. .$15.00 . 277.02 41.10 . 29.69 $9.31..Bal. end . 48.58 47. 42.. of 12 mo. . 69.56 22.16 $18.78 Rent. .. ..$ 8.00. .$ 96.00. Food... . . 19.65. . 2.35.92. F. & L. . . . 3.25. . 39.00. Clo . . 8.00. . 96.00. Sund... .. 3.95. . 47.40. $42. 85.. $514. 32.. $535. 85. .$554. 63.. $78. 26.. $56. 73 Family No. 22, Woman, 3 children, 10, 7, 4 Rent $10.00. .$120.00. .$105.00. .$415.89 $15.00 Food 25.39.. 304.68.. 237.18 67.50 F. &L 3.25.. 39.00.. 43.00 $4.06 Bal. end Clo 10.00.. 120.00.. 11.76 108.24. .of 12 mo. Sund 4.00.. 48.00.. 17.32 30.68. .$1.57 $52. 64.. $631. 68.. $414. 32.. $415. 89..$ 4. 06. $221. 42 Family No. 23, Woman, 3 children, 11, 8, 5 Rent $15.00. .$180.00. .$180.00. .$698.86 Food 24.57.. 294.84.. 311.14 $16.30 F. &L 3.25.. 39.00.. 41.59 2.59 Clo 8.00.. 96.00.. 42.29 .$53.71. .Bal. end Simd 4.50.. 54.00.. 98.77 44.77 of 12 mo. C. F 2.60.. 31.20.. 22.00 9. 20.. $3. 07 $57.92. .$695.04. .$695.79. .$698.86. .$63.66. .$62.91 Family No. 24, Woman, 3 children, 12, 11, 10 . Rent $13.00. .$156.00. .$149.50. .$559.09 $ 6.50 Food 20.47.. 245.64.. 267.18 $21.54 F.&L 3.25.. 39.00.. 25.06 13.94. .Bal. end Clo 8.00.. 96.00.. 78.20 17.80. .of 12 mo. Sund 3.50.. 42.00.. 32.66 9. 34.. $6. 49 $48.22. .$578.64. .$552.60. .$559.09. .$21.54. .$47.58 Family No. 25, Woman, 3 children, 14, 10, 8 Rent $11.00. .$132.00. .$138.00. .$657.66. .$ 6.00 Food 29.48.. 353.76.. 322.37 $31.39 F.&L 3.25.. 39.00.. 34.35 4. 65.. Bal. end Clo 10.00.. 120.00.. 60.42 59.58. .of 12 mo. Sund 4.60.. 55.20.. 92.21 37.01 $10.31 $58.33. .$699.96. .$647.35. .$657.66. .$41.01. .$95.62 36 The Minimum Cost of Living Est. of needs Act. Exp. Act. Inc. Act. over Act. under 1 mo. 12 mo. 12 mo. 12 mo. budget budget Summary Family No. 26. Woman, 3 children, 10, 8, 5 Rent $14. 00.. $168. 00.. $157. 00., $651. 46 $11.00 Food 24.47.. 293.64.. 309.12 $15.48 F.&L 3.25.. 39.00.. 17.83 21.17. .Bal. end CIo 8.00.. 96.00.. 71.83 24. 17. .of 12 mo. Sund 3.51.. 42.12.. 91.64 49.52 $4.04 $53.23. .$638.76. .$647.42. .$651.46. .$65.00. .$56.34 Family No. 27, Woman, 3 children, 15, 10, 9 Rent $14.00. .$168.00. .$179.50. .$008.88. .$11.50 Food 22.11.. 265.32.. 238.63 $26.69 F.&L 3.25.. 39.00.. 36.18 2. 82.. Bal. end Clo 8.00.. 96.00.. 101.71 5.71 of 12 mo. Sund 3.00.. 36.00.. 51.32 15.32 $1.54 $50.36. .$704.32. . .$607 . 34 . . $608 . 88 . .$32.53. .$29.51 Family No. 28, Woman, 3 children, 12, 10, 7 Rent $13.00. Food 22.11. F.&L.... 3.25. Clo 8.00. Sund 2.00. $156 00 265 32 39 00 96 00 24 00 .$156.00. .$592.74 . 259.55 $ 5.77 . 26.88 12.12 Bal. end . 43.69 52.31. .of 12 mo. . 65.04 $41.04 $35.58 $48.36. .$580.32. .$551.16. .$592.74. .$41.04. .$71.20 Family No. 29, Woman, 3 children, 11, 8, 6 Rent $10.00. .$120.00. .$115.00. .$396.55 $ 5.00. Food . . . . 19.66. 235.92 F.&L... . 3.25. 39.00 Clo . 8.00. 96.00 Sund . . . . 3.30. 39.60 193.67 42.25 15.95 23.05 Bal. end 34.81 61. 19.. of 12 mo. 33.41 6. 19. .$3.71 $44.21. .$530.52. .$392.84. .$396.55 $137.68 Family No. 30, Woman, 4 children, 15, 13, 12, 10 Rent $19.00. .$228.00 Food 27.84.. F.&L. .. 3.25.. Clo 10.00.. Sund 2.00.. 334 . 08 39.00 120.00 24.00 $.52.09. ..$745.08 .$208.25. .$671.38 $19.75 . 342 . 63 $ 8 . 55 ...39.44 M Bal. end . 31.31 88.69. .of 12 mo. . 47.15 23.15 $2.60 .$668.78. .$071.38. .$32. M $108.44 Expense Accounts of the Seventy-five Families 37 Est. of needs Act. Exp. Act. Inc. Act. over Act. under 1 mo. 12 mo. 12 mo. 12 mo. budget budget Summary Family No. 31, Woman, 4 children, 13, 11, 9, 7 Rent $14.00. .S168.00. .$148.00. .$515.10. . $26.38. .$20.00 Food 24.57.. 294.84.. 220.55 74.29 F.&L 3.25.. 39.00.. 18.92 20.08. .Bal. end Clo 10.00.. 120.00.. 55.59 64 .41. .of 12 mo. Sund 3.73.. 44.76.. 71.14 $.90 $55.55. .$666.60. .$514.20. .$515.10. .$26. 38. $178. 78 Family No. 32, Woman, 4 children, 10, 8, 6, 5 Rent $12.00. .$144.00. .$132.00. .$502.07 $12.00 Food 22.93.. 255.16.. 265.07 $ 9.91 F.&L 3.25.. 39.00.. 22.65 16.35. .Bal. end Clo 10.00.. 120.00.. 47.19 72.81. .of 12 mo. Sund 4.00.. 48.00.. 35.15 12.85. .$.01 $52.18. .$606.16. .$502.06. .$502.07. .$ 9. 91. $114. 01 Family No. 33, Woman, 4 children, 12, 9, 8, 6 Rent $21.00. .$252.00. .$243.00. .$024.60 $ 9.00 Food 22.11.. 265.32.. 245.70 19.62 F.&L 3.25.. 39.00.. 20.83 14. 17.. Bal. end Clo 10.00.. 120.00.. 28.01 91.99. .of 12 mo. Sund 6.98.. 83.76.. 78.19 5. 57.. $4. 87 $63,34. .$760.08. .$619.73. .$624.60 $140.35 Family No. 34, Woman, 4 children, 15, 13, 11, 4 Rent $12. 00.. $144. 00.. $176. 00.. $752. 66.. $32. 00 Food 34.40.. 412.80.. 385.54 $27.26 F.&L 3.25.. 39.00.. 39.02 02 Bal. end Clo 10.00.. 120.00.. 70.36 49.64. .of 12 mo. Sund 4.00.. 48.00.. 79.32 31.32 $2.42 $63.65. .$763.80. .$750.24. .$752.66. .$63.34. .$76.90 Family No. 35, Woman, 4 children, 9, 7, 6, 4 Rent $14.00. .$168.00. .$168.00. .$625.39 Food 20.47.. 245.64.. 251.08 $ 5.44 F.&L 3.25.. 39.00.. 29.65 $ 9.35. .Bal. end Clo 9.00.. 108.00.. 88.57 19.43. .of 12 mo. Sund 3.95.. 47.40.. 81.06 33.66 $7.03 $50.67. .$608.04. .$618.36. .$625.39. .$39.10. .$28.78 38 The Minimum Cost of Living Est. of needs Act. Exp. Act. Inc. Act. over Act. under 1 mo. 12 mo. 12 mo. 12 mo. budget budget Summary Family No. 36, Woman, 4 children, 16, 11, 9, 8 Rent S13. 50.. $162. 00.. $161. 65.. $647. 47 $ .35 Food 27 . 02. . 324 . 24 . . 324 . 87 $ .63 F. &L 3.25.. 39.00.. 54.50 15.40 Bal. end Clo 10.00.. 120.00.. 52.37 67.63. .of 12 mo. Simd 2.00.. 24.00.. 33.51 9.51 $20.67 $55.77. .$669.24. .$626.80. .$647.47. .$25.54. .$67.98 Family No. 37, Woman, 4 children, 14, 13, 11, 9 Rent $ 18.00. .$406.26. .$18.00 Food $22. 11.. $265. 32.. 258.24 $ 7.08 F. &L 3.25.. 39.00.. 34.70 4. 30.. Bal. end Clo 10.00.. 120.00.. 55.36 64.64. .of 12 mo. Sund 3.30.. 39.60.. 39.45 15.. $.51 $38.66. .$463.92. .$405.75. .$406.26. .$18.00. .$76.17 Family No. 38, Woman, 4 children, 17, 15, 13, 11 Rent $10.00. .$120.00. .$125.00. .$566.54. .$ 5.00. Food 22.93.. 275.16.. 280.76 5.60 F. &L 3.25.. 39.00.. 25.50 $13. 50.. Bal. end Clo 8.00.. 96.00.. 47.98 48.02. .of 12 mo. Sund 3.50.. 42.00.. 87.24 45.24 $.06 $47.68. .$572. 16. .$566.48. .$566.54. .$55.84. .$61.52 Family No. 39, Woman, 4 children, 7, 6, 5, 3 .$156. 00.. $615. 82. Rent. .. ..$13.00. .$156.00. Food... .. 21.35. . 256.20. F.&L.. . . 3.25. . 39.00. Clo .. 10.00. . 120.00. Sund . . . .. 3.40. . 40.80. 314.76 $58.50 30.31 $ 8.09. .Bal. end 63.29 56.71. .of 12 mo. 48.99 8.19 $2.47 $51.00. .$012.00. .$613.35. .$615.82. .$66.75. .$65.40 Family No. 40, Woman, 4 children, 13, 11, 8, 4 Rent $13.00. .$1.50.00. .$1.56.00. .$573.39 Food 25.75.. 309.00.. 319.16 $10.16 .$1.'')0 .00 . 309 .00 , 39 .00 . 48 .00 36. 00. F.&L 3.25.. 39.00.. 16.81 $22. 19.. Bal. end Clo 4.00.. 48.00.. 40.38 7.62..ofl2mo Sund 3.00.. 36.00.. 70.43 34.43 $29.38 $49.00. .$588.00. .$002.78. .$573.39. .$44.59. .$29.81 Expense Accounts of the Seventy-five Families 39 Est. of needs Act. Exp. Act. Inc. Act. over Act. under 1 mo. 12 mo. 12 mo. 12 mo. budget budget Summary Family No. 41, Woman, 4 children, 9, 7, 5, 3 Rent $12.00. .$144.00. .$144.00. .$542.10 Food 19.13.. 229.56.. 206.19 $23.36 F.&L 3.25.. 39.00.. 35.12 3.88 Clo 10.00.. 120.00.. 49.41 70.59..BaI. end Sund 3.95.. 47.40.. 73.46 $26.06 of 12 mo. Nur. fees . 1,30.. 15.60.. 32.45 16.85 $1.47 $49. 63.. $595. 56. .$540.63. .$542.10. .$42.91. .$97.83 Family No. 42, Woman, 4 children, 16, 13, 9, 5 Rent $1200. .$144.00. .$136.00. .$685.78 $ 8.00 Food 29.48. . 353.76. . 349.96 3.80 F.&L 3.25.. 39.00.. 45.54 $6.54 Clo 10.00.. 120.00.. 65.49 54.51..Bal. end Sund 3.73.. 44.36.. 56.85 12.09 of 12 mo. C. F 2.40.. 28.80.. 29.68 88 $2.26 $60.86. .$730.32. .$683.52. .$685.78. .$19.51. .$66.31 Family No. 43, Woman, 4 children, 14, 12, 9, 5 Rent $ 7.50. .$ 90.00. .$125.00. .$639.05. .$35.00 339.10 $21.26 20.18 18.82..Ba!. end 80.58 39.42. .of 12 mo. 63.90 38.90 $10.29 Food ,. 30.03.. . 360.36.. F.&L... ,. 3.25.. , 39.00.. Clo ,. 10.00.. . 120.00.. Sund ,. 2.00.. 24.00.. $52.78. .$633.36. .$628.76. .$639,05. .$74.90. .$79.50 Family No. 44, Woman, 4 children, 12, 8, 5, 3 Rent $11.00. .$132.00. .$126.50. .$544.06 $ 5.50 270.73 $ 5.41 22.49 16.51..BaI. end 54.61 65. 39.. of 12 mo. 67.02 24.78 $2.71 Food. ... . . 22.11.. . 265.32 F. & L. . . , . 3.25.. . 39.00 Clo , . 10.00., . 120.00 Sund ,. 3.52.. 42.24 $49,88. .$598.56. .$541.35. .$544.06. .$30.19. .$87.40 Family No. 45, Woman, 4 children, 12, 9, 5, 2 Rent $ 5.00. .$ 60.00. .$ 80.00. .$557.55. .$20.00 Food ,. 22.11.. , 265,32 F.&L... . 3.25.. 39.00 Clo , . 10.00., , 120,00 Sund . 4 , 38 . . 52.56 291.37 26.05 19.89 $19.11. .Bal. end 75.72 44. 28.. of 12 mo. 82,79 30.23 $7.78 $44.74. .$549.78. .$549.78. .$557.55. . $76.28. .$63.39 40 The Minimum Cost of Living Est. of needs Act. Exp. Act. Inc. Act. over Act. under 1 mo. 12 mo. 12 mo. 12 mo. budget budget Summary Family No. 46, Woman, 4 children, 16, 10, 8, 6 Rent $13. 00.. $156. 00. .$147.00. .8751 .50 $ 9.00 Food 27.84.. 334.08.. 332.67 1.41 F. &L 3.25.. 39.00.. 31.26 7.74 Clo 10.00.. 120.00.. 87.76 32.24..Bal. end Sund 2.00.. 24.00.. 77.47 $53.47 of 12 mo. C. F 2.60.. 31.20.. 53.20 22.00 $22.14 $58.69. .$704.28. .$729.36. .$751.50. .$75.47. .$50.39 Family No. 47, Woman, 4 children, 15, 13, 11, 6 .$168.00. .$.505.38 Rent . . . ..$14.00. .$168.00 Food. .. .. 26.21. . 314.52 F. & L. . . . 3.25. . 39.00 Clo .. 10.00. . 120.00 Sund . . . .. 2.00. . 24.00 262.76 $51.76 5.95 33.05..Bal. end 26.05 93.95. .of 12 mo. 25.20 $ 1.20 $17.42 $55.46. .$665.52. .$487.96. .$505.38. .$ 1.20. $178. 76 Family No. 48, Woman, 4 children, 12, 9, 7, 5 Rent $11.00. .$132.00. .$122.00. .$550.32 $10.00 Food 22.95.. 275.40.. 282.49 $ 7.09 F. &L 3.25.. 39.00.. 38.64 36..Bal. end Clo 10.00.. 120.00.. 60.76 59.24. .of 12 mo. Sund 2.00.. 24.00.. 45.55 21.55 $.88 $49.20. .$590.40. .$549.44. .$550.32. .$28.64. .$09.60 Family No. 49, Woman, 5 children, 15, 13, 9, 7, 5 Rent $15.00. .$180.00. .$168.75. .$716.51 $11.25 Food 32.30.. 387.60.. 334.56 53.04 F. &L 3.25.. 39.00.. 43.46 $4.40 Bal. end Clo 12.00. . 144.00. . 73.63 70.37. .of 12 mo. Sund 4.60.. 55.20.. 96.69 41.49 $.58 $67.15. .$805.80. .$717.09. .$716.51. .$45.95. $134.66 Family No. 50, Woman, 5 children, 18, 12, 9, 7, 4 Rent $13.00. .$156.00. .$195.00. .$634.80. .$39.00 Food 27.02.. 324.24.. 298.49 $25.75 F.&L.... 3.25.. 39.00.. 31.89 7.11. .Bal. end Clo 6.00.. 72.00.. 99.28 27.28 of 12 mo. Sund 2.88.. .34. .56.. 46.09 11.53 $35.95 $52.15. .$625.80. .$670.75. .$634.80. .$77.81. .$32.86 Expense Accounts of the Seventy-five Families 41 Est. of needs Act. Exp. Act. Inc. Act. over Act. under 1 mo. 12 mo. 12 mo. 12 mo. budget budget Summary Family No. 51, Woman, 5 children, 15, 14, 11, 6, 5 Rent S10.50. .$126.00. .$136.00. .$691.03. .$10.00 Food 31.12.. 373.44.. 376.01 2.57 F.&L 3.25.. 39.00.. 35.35 $3.65..Bal. end Clo 12.00.. 144.00.. 91.33 52.67. .of 12 mo. Sund 2.00.. 24.00.. 52.03 28.03 $.31 $58.87. .$706.44. .$690.72. .$691.03. .$40.60. .$56.32 Family No. 52, Woman, 5 children, 19, 11, 10, 8, 5 Rent $15.00. .$165.00. .$150.00. .$832. 16 $15.00 Food 26.50.. 291.50.. 285.94 5.56 F.&L 3.25.. 35.75.. 35.05 70..Bal. end Clo 12.00.. 132.00.. 137.73 $5.73 of 12 mo. Sund 6.00.. 66.00.. 143.49 77.49 $79.95 $62. 75. .$690. 25.. $752. 21. .$832.16. .$83.22. .$21.26 Family No. 53, Woman, 5 children, 11, 9, 7, 5, 4 Rent $ 9.50. .$114.00. .$ 96.50. .$482.50 $17.50. Food. .. .. 22.11. . 265.33. . 278.27. $12.94. F. & L. . . . 3.25. . 39.00. . 22.27. . 16.73 Clo .. 10.00. . 120.00. . 70.03. . 49.97 Sund... .. 2.00. . 24.00. . 17.11. . 6.89 $46.86. .$562.33. .$484.18. .$482. 50.. $12. 94. .$91.09 . Bal. end .of 12 mo. .$1.68 Family No. 54, Woman, 5 children, 7, 6, 5, 4, 2 Rent $10.00. .$120.00. .$120.00. .$485.41 Food 23.00. F.&L 3.25.. 39.00.. 18.10 $20. 90.. Bal. end Clo 10.00.. 120.00.. 39.60 80.40. .of 12 mo. Sund 3.00.. 30.00.. 23.73 12. 27.. $5. 90 $49.25. 276.00. . 278.08. .$ 2. .08. , 39.00. . 18.10. .$20.90. , 120.00. . 39.60. . 80.40. 30.00. . 23.73. . 12.27. $591.00. .$479.51. .$485.41. .$ 2.08. $113.57 Family No. 55, Woman, 5 children, 13, 11, 7, 4, 20 months Rent $14.00. .$168.00. .$168.00. .$727.87 Food 28.84.. 346.08.. 337.90 $ 8.18 F.&L.... 3.25.. 39.00.. 40.97 $1.97 Clo 10.00.. 120.00.. 70.43 49, 57.. Bal. end Sund 4.40.. 52.80. . 106.92 54.12 of 12 mo. C. F 2.70 2.70 $.95 $60. 49.. $725. 88.. $726. 92.. $727. 87.. $58. 79.. $57. 75 42 The Minimum Cost of Living Est. of needs Act. Exp. Act. Inc. Act. over Act. under 1 mo. 12 mo. 12 mo. 12 mo. budget budget Summary Family No. 56, Woman, 5 children, 17, 15, 11, 9, 7 Rent $15.00. .$180.00. .$174.50. .$897.56 $ 5.50 Food 38.50.. 502.00.. 370.01 131.99 F. &L 3.25.. 39.00.. 54.62 $15.62 Clo 12.00.. 144.00.. 109.14 34.86 Sund 2.44.. 29.28.. 123.23 93.95 Bal. end C. F 2.60.. 31.20.. 58.50 27.30 of 12 mo. Debtpd 3.31 3.31 $4.25 $73. 79.. $925. 43.. $893. 31.. $897. 46. $140. 18. $172. 35 Family No. 57, Woman, 5 children, 13, 12, 9, 7, 5 Rent $18.00. .$216.00. .$216.00. .$863.57 Food 31.12.. 373.44.. 369.96 $3.48 F. &L 3.25.. 39.00.. 50.87 $11.87 Bal. end Clo 12.00.. 144.00.. 62.35 81.65. .of 12 mo. Sund 4.40.. 52.80.. 73.31 20.51 $91.08 $68.77. .$825.24. .$772.49. .$863.57. .$32.38. .$85.13 Family No. 58, Woman, 5 children, 17, 15, 13, 7, 4 Rent $13.00. .$156.00. .$156.00. .$845.97 411.73 $ 8.77 Food . 33.58.. , 402.96.. F.&L... . 3.25.. , 39.00.. Clo . 10.00.. 120.00.. Sund . 3.91.. 46.92.. C. F . 2.40.. 28.80.. 29.23 $ 9.77 96.64 23. 36.. Bal. end 51.57 4.65 of 12 mo. 82.60 53.80 $18.20 $66.14. .$793.68. .$827.77. .$845.97. .$67.22. .$33.13 Family No. 59, Woman, 5 children, 10, 7, 4, 3, 18 months Rent $14. 00.. $168. 00.. $176. 00.. $692. 84..$ 8.00 Food 25.27.. 303.24.. 316.49 13.25 F.&L 3.25.. 39.00.. 53.20 14.20 Bal. end Clo 12.00.. 144.00.. 76.84 $67.16. .of 12 mo. Sund 3.52.. 42.24.. 69.24 27.00 $1.07 $58.04. .$696. 48.. $691. 77. .$692.84. .$62.45. .$67.16 Family No. 60, Woman, 5 children, 11, 10, 8, 5, 4 Rent $11. 50.. $138. 00.. $138. 00. .$685.81 Food 30.94.. 371.28.. 347.42 $23.86 F.&L.... 3.25.. 39.00.. 47.55 $8.55 Bal. end Clo 12,00.. 144.00.. 124.05 19.95. .of 12 mo. Sund 2.00.. 24.00.. 29.32 5.32 $.53 $59.69. .$716.28. .$686.34. .$685.81. .$13.87. .$43.81 Expense Accounts of the Seventy-five Families 43 Est. of needs Act. Exp. Act. Inc. Act. over Act. under 1 mo. 12 mo. 12 mo. 12 mo. budget budget Summary Family No. 61, Woman, 5 children, 13, 11, 9, 8, 5 Rent S16.00. .$192.00. .$176.00. .$767.62 $16.00 383.90 $ 8.78 36.68 2.32 74.06 69.94..Bal. end 86.03 38.63 of 12 mo. 8.75 53. 65.. $2. 20 Food . 31.26.. 375.12. F. &L... , . 3.25.. . 39.00. CIo , . 12.00.. , 144.00. Sund .. 3.95.. , 47.40. C. F . 5.20.. 62.40. $71.66. .$859.92. .$765.42. .$767.62. .$47. 41. $141. 91 Family No. 62, Woman, 5 children, 13, 11, 8, 4, 2 Rent $15.00. .$180.00. .$180.00. .$764.43 Food . 30.00.. 360.00. F. & L. . . . 3.25. . 39.00. Clo . . 14.00., . 168.00. Sund . 5.03.. 60.36. 380.39 $20.39 35.00 $ 4.00..Bal. end 129.79 38.21. .of 12 mo. 38.70 21.66. .$.55 $67.28. .$807.36. .$763.88. .$764.43. .$20.39. .$63.87 Family No. 63, Woman, 5 children, 11, 10, 8, 7, 4 Rent $11.00. .$132.00. .$132.00. .$681.98 Food 30.94.. 371.28.. 360.24 $11.04 F. &L 3.25.. 39.00.. 19.43 19.57..Bal. end Clo 10.00.. 120.00.. 76,19 43,81. .of 12 mo. Sund 4.40.. 52.30.. 89.72 $37.42 $4.40 $59.59. .$714.58. .$677.58. .$681.98. .$37.42. .$74.42 Family No. 64, Woman, 6 children, 13, 11, 10, 7, 5, 8 mo. Rent $13.00. .$156.00. .$169.00. .$767.98. . $13.00 Food 30.67.. 368.04.. 390.29 22.25 F. &L 3.25.. 39.00.. 40.20 1.20 Bal. end Clo 10.00.. 120,00.. 109,04 $10.96. .of 12 mo. Sund 3.08.. 36.96.. 55,69 18.73 $3.76 $60.00. .$720.00. .$764.22. .$767.98. .$55.18. .$10.96 Family No. 65, Woman, 6 children, 14, 13, 10, 9, 7, 6 Rent $14. 00.. $168. 00. .$168,00. .$851.76 Food 37.67.. 442,04.. 431.13 $10,91 F.&L 3.25.. 39.00.. 44.03 $5,03 Bal. end Clo 14,00.. 168.00.. 124.76 43.24. , of 12 mo. Sund 7.70.. 92,40.. 72.77 19.63. .$11.07 $76.62. .$909. 44.. $840. 69. .$851.76..$ 5.03. .$73.78 44 The Minimum Cost of Living Est. of needs 1 mo. 12 mo. Act. Exv. Act. Inc. 12 mo. 12 mo. Act. over Act. under budget budget Summary Family No. 66, Woman, 6 children, 16, 14, 12, 10, 8, 5 Rent. Food. F. &L CIo... Sund. C. F.. S12.00. 38 . 95 . 3.25. 12.00. 5.18. 5.20. $144.00. . 467.40. . 39.00. . 144.00. . 62.16. . 62.40. $125.00. .$913.15 $19.00 . 521.88 $54.48 . 17.19 21.81 . 83.96 60.04..Bal. end . 84.91 22.75 of 12 mo. . 74.15 11.75 $6.06 $76.58. .$918.96. .$907.09. .$913. 15. .$88. 23. $100. 85 Family No. 67, Woman, 6 children, 19, 18, 15, 14, 9, 6 Rent $18.00. .$216.00. .$243.00 $1,172.50. .$27.00 Food 40.13.. 481.56.. 561.74 80.18 F.&L 3.25.. 39.00.. 63.82 24.82 Clo 12.00.. 144.00.. 91.67 $52.33..BaI. end Sund 2.00.. 24.00.. 173.67 149.67 of 12 mo. C. F 30.80. 30.80 $7.80 $75.38. .$904.56$1,164.70$1,172.50.$312.47. .$52.33 Family No. 68, Woman, 6 children, 16, 13, 11, 8, 6, 2 Rent $15. 00.. $180. 00..$ 81 .00. .$417.25 $99.00. Food 28.67.. 344.04.. F.&L 3.25.. 39.00. Clo 10.00.. 120.00. Sund 2.00.. 24.00., 178.33 165.71 15.73 23.27. .Bal. end 80.33 39.67. .of 12 mo. 51.27 $27.27 $10.59 $58.92. .$707.04. .$406.66. .$417.25. .$27.27.8327.65 Family No. 69, Woman, 6 children, 15, 13, 9, 7, 6, 4 Rent $15.00. .$180.00. .$175.00. .$790.31 $ 5.00. Food 28.67.. 344.04. F.&L 3.25.. 39.00. Clo 12.00.. 144.00. Sund 4.60.. 55.20. 388.61 $44. .J7 42.72 3.72 Bal. end 36.80 107.20. .of 12 mo. 89 . 78 34 . 58 $29 . 33 $63.52. .$762.24. .$732.91. .$790.31. .$82. 87. $112. 20 Family No. 70, Woman, 7 children, 15, 14, 12, 11, 10, 6, 5 Rent ,S12.50. .$150.00. .$153.00. .$765.88. .$ 3.00. . Food 37.67.. F.&L.... 3.25.. Clo 14.00.. Sund 62.65. . 452.04. 39.00. 168.00. 91.80. 362.99 $89.05 57.14 18.14 Bal. end 61.27 106.73. .of 12 mo. 99.22 7.42 $.32.26 $70.07. .$900.84. .$733.62. .$765. .$28.56.195.78 Expense Accounts of the Seventy-five Families 45 Est. of needs Act. Exp. Act. Inc. Act. over Act. under 1 mo. IZ mo. 12 mo. 12 mo. budget budget Summary Family No. 71, Woman, 7 children, 17, 15, 13, 11, 9, 7, 3 Rent $20. 00.. $240. 00. .$203. 00 $1,139. 32 $37.00 520.88 29.44 42.44 $ 3.44 163.43 28.57..Bal. end 109.66 75.58 of 12 mo. 94.39 92. 81.. $5. 52 Food , . 45.86.. . 550.32. F. &L... . 3.25., . 39.00. Clo . . 16.00., . 192.00. Sund.... . 2,84.. 34.08. C. F . 15.60.. 187.20. $103. 55 $1,242. 60 $1,133. 80 $1,139. 32.. $79. 02. $187. 82 Family No. 72, Woman, 7 children, 16, 14, 11, 9, 7, 4, 2 Rent $14.00. .$168,00. .$168.00. .$852.17 Food 40.95.. 491.40.. 410,35 $81.05 F. &L 3.25.. 39.00.. 30.00 9,00 Clo 12.00.. 144,00,. 115,87 28,13,.Bal. end Sund 4.38.. 52,56.. 63.98 $11.42 of 12 mo. C. F 5.20.. 62,40.. 53.55 8. 85,, $10, 42 $79.78. .$957.36. .$841.75. .$852.17. .$11. 42, $127, 03 Family No. 73, Woman, 7 children, 15, 14, 12, 10, 9, 7, 4 Rent $15,00, .$180,00, .$132,00, ,$898,68 $48,00 Food 36,04,. 432,48.. 449,81 $17.33 F. &L 3,25.. 39,00.. 65,61 26,61 Clo 14,00.. 168,00.. 64,93 103,07..Bal end. Sund 3.64.. 43.68.. 174,42 130,74 of 12 mo. C. F 2.60.. 31,20.. 9.60 21,60. .$2.31 $74,53. .$894.36. .$896,37. .$898. 68. $174. 68, $172. 67 Family No. 74, Woman, 7 children, 18, 16, 14, 12, 8, 7, 5 Rent $17,00. .$204,00, ,$198.00 $1,145.41 $ 6,00 626.67 $66.51 40.13 1.13 Bal. end 111.68 80.32. , of 12 mo. 170.86 110,86 $1.93 Food .. 46.68.. 560,16. F.&L... . 3.25. . 39.00. Clo , . 16.00,. . 192,00. Sund . 5,00,. 60.00. $87.93 $1,055. 16 $1,147. 34 $1.145. 41, $178, 50., $86, 32 Family No. 75, Woman, 8 children, 17, 15, 13, 10, 9, 8, 7, 5 Rent $15.50, .$186.00. .$161,00. .$930,00 $25,00 Food 49,14,. 589,68.. 502,55 87.13 F.&L 3,25,. 39,00.. 31,96 7. 04.. Bal. end Clo 18.00.. 216.00.. 91.77 124.23. .of 12 mo. Sund 5.54.. 66.48., 135.36 $68,88 $7,36 $91. 43 $1,097. 16.. $922. 64. .$930.00. .$68. 88. $243. 40 PART III WHAT THE STUDY REVEALED CHAPTER I Conditions Previous to Steady Income The families have been known to the Associa- tion for varying periods before the death of the breadwinner. In all cases the income had been irregular or insufficient or both for a considerable time. The health of various members had suf- fered accordingly. Before the granting of the regular income there was careful instruction in each family for at least six months. During this time members of the Home Economics' staff gave lessons in planning, buying and feeding, so that the housekeeper might be prepared to use her income to the best advan- tage. During the time when the various families were being supported by the mothers' earnings, by church and other societies, the income was in- determinate in fifty-nine of the families. In the other sixteen it was possible to approximate the income. Of this number, according to the estimate on which this study is based, there was a deficit 49 50 The Minimum Cost of Living in all cases, the highest being $34.00 per month, the lowest $1.00, and the average $14.00 monthly. It is safe to say that not one of the seventy-five famihes had escaped some degree of ill health because of insufficient income. After the allowances were granted the families were grouped according to income as follows: Income Number of Families Between 200 and 300 1 " 300 " 400 2 " 400 " 500 8 " 500 " 600 22 " 600 " 700 18 " 700 " 800 12 " 800 " 900 7 " 900 " 1000 2 " 1100 " 1200 3 75 At the end of the first year of steady income six of the seventy-five showed a deficit, the average deficit for the twelve months being $27.99. The remaining sixty-nine showed a surplus, the average being $9.72. The following table shows the number of families who spent more than the estimate, and the average amount of this expenditure, also the number of Conditions Previous to Steady Income 51 families who spent less than the estimate of the average sum in each case: Itemized Analysis of the Above No. Families Average No. Families Average Item Above Sum Below Sum Rent 18 $14.97 31 $18.02 Food 38 29.80 37 29.30 Fuel and Light. . .24 8.12 51 11.30 Clothing 5 15.43 70 54.55 Insurance* 29 12.43 32 4.92 Sundries 64 28.35 11 10.94 Carfare 8 28.37 6 35.30 One important part of the plan was the supervi- sion of health conditions by the Association's nurses. Before the granting of the cash allowance a record was made of the health of each member of all the families after a careful medical examina- tion. The nurses' records show the progress from month to month, and the following is a verbatim report of conditions in each family at the end of the year: HEALTH CONDITIONS AFTER A YEAR OF STEADY INCOME Family Health After Year of Teaching and Steady Income FamUy No. 1 . . Family well. " " 2. .Conditions satisfactory. * Budgets include insurance under Sundries. 52 The Minimum Cost of Living Family Health After Year of Teaching and Steady Income Family No. 3. .Children improved in health. " 4 .. Health of family improved. " 5. .Family all well. " 6 .. Plan a success. Conditions excellent. " 7 .. Children improved. Medical care given. Satis- factory results. " 8. .Conditions satisfactory. " 9.. Health good. " 10. .Family all in better health. " 11. .Marked difference in health. " 12. .Health improved. Steady advance at all points. " 13 . . Health of family good. " 14. .Family all in better health. " 15. .Children show good effects from care from mother. " 16.. Good results. " 17 . . Improved in all ways. " 18. .General health of family good. " 19. .Excellent health. " 20. .Woman and children all show marked improve- ment. " 21 . . Entire family well. " 22. .Woman delicate but improved in health. Chil- dren well. " 23 .. Conditions much improved. Health of famUy good. " 24. .Health of all the family improved. " 25.. Children show good effects of home care of mother. Health improved. " 26. .Children well. Woman much improved. " 27. .Living conditions greatly improved. Woman under medical care. " 28. .Health conditions satisfactory. " 29 . . Health of family good. " 30 .. Health much improved. " 31.. Health good. Conditions Previous to Steady Income 53 Family Health After Year of Teaching and Steady Income Family No. 32. .All the family well. " " 33. .AH the family show marked improvement in health since steady income. " " 34 . . Woman not strong but great improvement noted in all members of the family. " " 35 .. Slow but steady improvement. " 36..Family all well. " " 37 . . Health decidedly improved. " " 38 .. Great improvement in health. " "39. .Family better but still shows the effect of long continued under-nourishment. " " 40 .. Family greatly improved since granting of steady income. " " 41 . .Great improvement in health of all the family. " " 42.. Health of family good. " " 43 .. Slow but steady improvement. " " 44. .Health of family good. " " 45. .Health decidedly improved. " " 46. .Woman's health improving rapidly after steady income came. " " 47 .. Steady improvement in every possible way . " " 48.. Much better health. " " 49.. Family weU. " " 50. .Health improved but still below. " " 51 . . General health of all the family good. " " 52. .Woman and children all well. " " 53. .Family in good health. " " 54.. Entire family well. " " 55. .Health of entire family improved since steady income began. " " 56 .. Remarkable gain in health of all members of the family. " " 57. .Family improved rapidly. " " 58. .Remarkable improvement. " " 59. .Steady improvement. " " 60 . . Good improvement in all the family. 54 The Minimum Cost of Living Family Health After Year of Teaching and Steady Income Family No. 61. .Woman gaining strength and courage. " " 62. .Vast improvement in all directions. " " 63 .. Steadily improving. " " 64 .. Steady improvement. Children very well. " " 65. .AH conditions improving rapidly. " " 66 .. Children show splendid improvement. " " 67 .. All improved. " " 68. .Entire family well. " " 69. .Family all improved. " 70. .All well. " " 71. .Slow but steady improvement. " 72.. Excellent health. " " 73 .. Family all well. " " 74. .Conditions improved. " " 75. .Steady improvement. The most cursory examination of the above records leads inevitably to the conclusion that even a minimum sum carefully administered, will do much for families who have been living on a ' ' hand-to-mouth ' ' basis. We may sum up as follows : A carefully planned minimum standard can lay the foundation of good health for all members of the family. Such a sum can restore shattered nerves and renew courage for a mother who has been harassed by irregular and uncertain payments of an income inadequate at the best. Such an assured minimum can change pale and listless children into rosy- cheeked romping boys and girls. Conditions Previous to Steady Income 55 It is worth while to consider now just what prac- tical application can be made of the facts noted above. The present study is not concerned pri- marily with the sources of the family income. This income may be received in the form of a pension from private or State funds, from the earnings of the children, or from the combined earnings of all the members of the family. One object has been to help in fixing an adequate standard of living for families in corresponding income groups. In the succeeding pages when the items of the estimate are discussed in detail there will be sug- gestions for improvement in this estimate. These suggestions may lead it is hoped to the considera- tion of the next step in this campaign of home preservation. This next step will be to discuss just how much must be added to the estimate of living needs so that the family income may pro- vide a comfortable balance. CHAPTER II Housing Conditions The sum paid for rent was largely a concession to circumstances. It will be worth while to as- certain, first, the percentage spent for rent by each family according to income; second, the number of rooms needed to keep the family in health and comfort; third, the maximum of con- venience procurable by families in this income group; and finally, the fluctuations of rent ac- cording to the number of rooms. Of the seventy-five families, one with an income of $200-$300, paid its rent by janitor service; famihes in the S300-$400 group paid 28% of theu- income for rent; those in the $400-$500, a per- centage of 17-25; in the $500-1600, a percentage of 16-33; in the $600-$700, a percentage of 18-38; in the $700-$800, a percentage of 18-34; in the $800-1900, a percentage of 16-33; in the $900- $1,000, a percentage of 13-17; and in the $1,000 to $1,100 group, a percentage of 17-18 of the income. 56 Housing Conditions 57 NUMBER OP ROOMS NEEDED Perhaps the best way to discuss this question is to give a report of the number of rooms the famines actually had. It has already been stated that the housing conditions were somewhat of a compromise, and the workers were agreed that, while the famihes were comfortable in these quarters, and while the rent paid was all that they could afford, ideally, 50% of the famihes should have had at least one room additional. When considered according to the number of rooms needed, the famihes fall into the following groups : Group 1 — three famihes of three individuals each, one of these having three rooms, the other two famihes having four rooms. Group 2 — twenty-six families of four individ- uals, one having two rooms, twelve having three rooms, twelve having four rooms, and one having five rooms. Group 3 — nineteen famihes of five individuals each, seven having three rooms, ten having four rooms, and two having five rooms. Group 4 — fifteen famihes of six individuals 58 The Minimum Cost of Living each, five having three rooms, eight having four rooms, and two having five rooms. Group 5 — six famiUes of seven individuals each, three having three rooms, two having four rooms, and one having five rooms. Group 6 — five famihes of eight individuals each, four having four rooms, and one having five rooms. Group 7 — one family of nine individuals having four rooms. CONVENIENCES Of the seventy-five families, thirteen had private bathrooms, forty-four private toilets, thirty had joint use of toilets in the hall, and one, a toilet in the yard. RENT ACCORDING TO NUMBER OF ROOMS When considered according to the amount of space furnished for a given sum, the apartments may be grouped as follows: Group 1 — two apartments of two rooms, rent for each $10.00. Group 2 — twenty-nine apartments of three rooms; two having rent paid by janitor service, one renting at $7.50 per month, two at $8.00, Housing Conditions 59 one at $9.50, five at $10.00, four at $11.00, two at $12.00, eight at $13.00, two at $14.00, one at $15.00, and one at $19.00. Group 3 — forty apartments of four rooms; three of these having rent paid by janitor service, one at $10.50 per month, two at $11.00, three at $11.50, three at $12.00, seven at $13.00, one at $13.50, six at $14.00, three at $15.00, one at $15.50, two at $16.00, two at $17.00, two at $18.00, two at $20.00, and two at $21.00. Group 4 — six apartments of five rooms; one having rent paid by janitor service, one at $12.00 per month, one at $12.50, one at $14.00, one at $15.00, and one at $16.00 per month. Examination of the expense accounts shows that none of the famiUes can afford for rent a sum sufficient to insure really satisfactory housing. Indeed, one might say that existence in a typical tenement house is never wholly satisfactory from the point of view of sanitation, privacy and enjoy- ment. That om* families live in them such well- ordered fives, is a tribute to the resourcefulness and pluck of the housekeeper, as well as to the general cheerfulness of spirit prevailing among the various members of the family group. CHAPTER III The Seventy-five Dietaries Considered in Detail In fixing the ration allowance, the families are grouped according to size. It has already been stated that the ration allowance is planned so that groups of families may use it as a guide. In the first group we have families numbers 1 to 29, inclusive, in the second group, families numbers 30 to 48, inclusive, in the third group, families numbers 49 to 69, inclusive, in the fifth group, families numbers 70 to 74, inclusive, and family number 75, forms the sixth group. 60 The Seventy-jive Dietaries in Detail 61 O Ol t^ o 1? '^ 00 IN CO N lO 05 O ■»*< N- o M (M 03 tH rt "^ Xi - COOOOitOCOON COrfi'-iiOO'^O'!!' OOM'^'Oi-llNooO >7C0'0'-'C0O.C<3 "^ CO «5 N ■* N M in £ : ■* l-H rt O O -iooo>NM<-*oo OC<300t^' IN (N lO lO ^ (N IN t^ --I >-l Tl< •=< £ = ''5'*OOaiOcOOO''5 COiOtNiOCOOOO «3 t^ IN IN IN i-H Tf( o ^^ o h -^ CU >7 rt Cej 1^ CO 05 -H "J* 00 •"^ -^ t^ CO CO 03 "H rt CO OiNi-HOOOOOrooOOJ ■ -- ■ CO IN O t- OO CO CO ro CO r^ rH C5 F-l 1-1 lO OO CD IN 00 r-. Tt< t~ 00 IN CO t>- -^ O (N t^ "-I CO •3 . - - o- ii - - - - rf^JrCOOOOiOOCDlNO C000005<3I1«D050» '-it>.COcOO'OCOi-' ■* t^ .-I O i-H rH lO & ^ ffl PQ S t^ O cc (1, ^^ -J u^ taj t-1 QJ '^l O 62 The Minimum Cost of Living 00 rt 00 o o W r1 IN £ - -g. o S S ?2 12; o rti 00 g in o •"< O 00 "O to t, CO :^ (N r-i IN o* — " (N O lO CO O- =5 00 ^ 00 CO IN lO 00 O IM O ■-! in £ 050iO'*CO(NiOOO z s ,)( rjl •-I «D CO to 3 ^ o N 00 .-t to o; CO --I 00 O t-- "O '*< TJI CO CO '^ 10 CO o c^ •-! £ cccooot^toc^jt^oo OCOCO'-iCOOOO 1^ O CO CO i-H rt CM t-- O CO O CO CM CO CO CO CO CO CO o CO J>- i-H i-i CO 00 CM IS '^ CM CO CO CO r- CO 03 lO lO CO 05 CM t-i CO CM^OCOOOCOCO tzicoOcoiOTjit^co CO CO CM 00 CO CO >} ^ ~ fa 15 s CM CO t-l 1-4 >0 C3 *^ ^ CS '2 O OS, rt eQpq<5,^faOas&< The Seventy-five Dietaries in Detail 63 o S r? fg o r- ^- 15 J3 "^ 12 « ^ c^ CM ;::) N ■* — - O" — o m; -H CTi o o< ^ lO O M 5^ 00 ^ J- 00 S K ■* O (N rH lj5 rH «0 1-1 CO £ S S P S? w -o 12; S -» S t: S t^j -^ Cvl lO OoOOiOOMOtD C.5 £ : ^-« a =; 05 o CO CO ■o g CD T}< t> I-H ^ s s S - e^ o o 00 CD CO rf OS iH 2 00 CM t^ CI O^ CM rt CO O M Ph 00 >0 00 CM o CO o 5o C^ Ol CM S b -5 . « -■ s s £ O m fw 64 The Minimum Cost of Living » lO N (M (^ t^ «0 T-H •* M "O ^ O lO CO O H « (o <0 to ;o CO f-i N COOO(NCOCOO-o N "-i N in rS - 00 -rt^ 00 CO r^ Tj< O lO O lO CO »o C^^ rt lO 0> i-H cococ^c^i^cocor^ Oo"^''2O00'-iC0 O 00 CO 50 CO --i o o -l O T(< CO 00 CO o o o (N in CO ■^ 05 .-I m CO -< - M 05 N T-( CO M 60 *f mp3^SfeOa}F^ o- ii - = ; = o CD in o CM o CO CO CO CO CO 00 t^ CM O CM -I t^ £• ^ The Seventy-five Dietaries in Detail 65 •* i-l t- ^ 05 05 O CO «5 O to tH 5D eo oj CO "-I "c toooo-^cocooooo CO t^ O T»l - — — fe ^ O Tj< CO lO CO "3 ^ g§ ^ -. . . .. CO «o CJ i-l »o 00 t~ ci 00 JO lo T-H •* rt (N ^ o s rt "* to O •* o t^ c0 C^ i-H S ooooojcitot^-^ •» tSiOoOC^jTHcO.-i ~ ZOr-llO'^OCOrt CO o^ O rf< ■* CO c^ii3T-i'-ie-)Oco«o C^ t^ •* to to Ti CO 03 r*cOi-»tocoot^c^3 or-ooo"5coo.-ico t>. CO o> lo to "41 CO t^ O Tjl rt N 0> '3< N to N iH .-H (N ■* i-( iH 1-1 eo t^OOt^'NcO'-IO'H <-iot^£-toot^r^ 'Oi-c'H-<»^ to p^ 0 -l (N £ " O to i-l CO ■-< ;? 2 CO i-H 00 CO Tj< CO d'-iO'Ocsc^it^cirH o c^ ^ o r^ CO ic "5 « S »-• "f* >. O £ - a . ci CO fe^ S lO o Ji CO o 00 rt "3 CO <» (M rt lO THTt*»^COi/>00OJlO & ^ pqpa^^Pi^ycBP, t^Oi-HOwjoO'-i'-' '-'cooic^r-coioo •-I.-COC005C0C0O &«^ The Seventy-jive Dietaries in Detail 67 When the matter of instruction in diet was first contemplated the workers realized that they were facing a long campaign. In planning this campaign, the dietitians weighed carefully the need for each reform in diet, and the relative chances of success. They realized that it was a delicate matter to lay even the friendliest of hands on home matters, and so they decided to concentrate on one point at a time. Furthermore, it was planned to make each of these points the maximum of interest until some definite result should be accomplished. Left to its own devices, the average family in such a group, breakfasts on bread or sugar buns and tea. The noon meal, if ''supper" is the chief one of the day, will probably be "something quick," mayhap potato-salad or ham from the delicatessen store, with more tea; while the hot supper, if there has been no interruption of pay day, will always have meat, and almost always the meat will be fried. Besides this there will be pota- toes and sometimes a vegetable, with bread and coffee. ''The children must take what we do" — this means the strong coffee and tea, cold lunches, fried food, with no cer- 68 TJie Minimum Cost of Living tainty of the much needed milk, vegetables and fruit. In judging results of the food work, each part of the plan of instruction will be considered separately. Besides this, the dietary standard as a whole, will be discussed in relation to what ac- tually happened in the famihes. The plan of instruction included the following: 1. Food value of milk and economy in its use. 2. The advantage of a reasonable amount of meat. 3. The necessity for fruits and vegetables. 4. The use of cereals to give variety to the starchy foods. 5. Harmful effects of tea and coffee for children. We have aheady noted that the dietary stand- ard was used merely as a guide. The famihes were given advice and instruction in food matters, but the final choice was left to each housekeeper. It was thought wisest to follow this course, since arbitrary dictation would defeat the chief aim of the instruction. Furthermore, the real value of the standard itself could be better judged if a reasonable amount of freedom of choice were given. The Seventy-five Dietaries in Detail 69 Summary of the Food Figures Families approaching Standard Below Above MUk 60% 40% Meat 4% 96% Fruit and Vegetables 54% 6% 40% Bread 8% 92% Cereals 41% 8% 51% RESULTS FOLLOWING INSTRUCTION IN THE FOOD VALUE OF MILK The dietitians feel that the results here were fairly satisfactory. Slow and patient work is needed to bring about changes in food habits, and the women responded very well in this partic- ular. It is true that many educational agencies throughout the city have contributed to a popular knowledge concerning the value of milk, so that the A. I. C. P. workers found instruction on this point comparatively easy. In 1906, when the home teaching began, few families were using milk of any description with any degree of regularity, and it was quite excep- tional to find one using bottled milk. At the present time it is safe to say that it is the excep- tion to find a family that does not at least reaUze the value of bottled milk. 70 The Minimum Cost of Living The dietitians did not lose heart over the 40% of the famihes who fell below the milk standard. In each home there are special problems, and circumstances often conspire to make progress slow. It was difficult at first to convince the house- keepers that they could "afford" to buy a liberal quantity of milk. After they were convinced that milk not only contributed to the health of the family, but that it also was literally a cheap food, the battle was practically won. RESULTS FOLLOWING INSTRUCTION IN THE MODERATE USE OF MEAT From the beginning the workers realized that they could accomplish only one thing at a time. They realized that all of the families were buying meat in too large quantities. Education in the value of milk was, however, thought to be of primary importance, and the results of this are noted above. The results of the meat instruction do not appear on the surface at first glance. The die- titians succeeded in reducing the excessive amount very considerably in nearly every family. Beside The Seventy-jive Dietaries in Detail 71 this, in fixing the food standard the workers real- ized that the meat item was so low that probably none of the families would follow it exactly. The teachers felt sure, however, that no real harm would come from the small proportion of meat, since the other foods were being shifted into their right relationships. During the periods of irregular income preceding instruction, large purchases of meat were made whenever there was a temporary increase of money. The dietitians worked very hard to guard against such unwise planning in the future. Women were taught that it was harmful to the health of the famiUes to let this item of food as- sume too large a place in the dietary. RESULTS FOLLOWING INSTRUCTION IN USE OF FRUITS AND VEGETABLES For some time one of the dietitian's difficulties had been to induce the families to use enough of these foods. It took much persuasion to con- vince mothers that oranges were anything but an extravagance. The merits of ''plenty of milk and eggs" were extolled openly by the women, but the relation of carrots and spinach to bone 72 The Minimum Cost of Living material was quite a new idea. Because of these facts, and because of long acquaintance with the evils resulting from a diet low in fruit and vege- tables, the dietitians were not unduly cast down over the fact that the pendulum swung too far the other way. RESULTS FOLLOWING INSTRUCTION IN THE USE OF BREAD AND CEREALS There is a tendency among many of the families of the hard working population to depend too largely on the diet of bread and tea. There are two reasons for this, first, its apparent cheap- ness, and second, the ease with which it can be served. The dietitians realized this and from the be- ginning of the regular instruction kept these facts in mind. The plan was to introduce a variety of cereals and to cut down somewhat the expendi- tures for bread. A glance at the summary on page 69 shows that not much was accomplished along this line. It is true that a fair proportion came near the cereal allowance, but slightly more than half exceeded it and an overwhelming pro- portion went far beyond the bread allowance. The Seventy-jive Dietaries in Detail 73 These facts raise some interesting questions in dietetics. During the time when the famihes were subsisting on a meagre diet it was not surprising that they craved the energy-giving quahties of starch as well as its bulk. Conditions during the present study were, however, quite different. There was an abundance of fruit and vegetables, and plenty of strength foods. The question seems to be how far shall this demand for breadstuffs be respected in formulating future dietary standards. RESULTS FOLLOWING INSTRUCTION REGARDING TEA AND COFFEE Figures showing actual purchases of tea and coffee have not been tabulated, since the effect of these articles on the actual dietary is indirect only. Instruction concerning the harmful effects of these beverages for children was continuous and results have been satisfactory. There is a close relationship in milk education and the decreased use of the tea and coffee. It was explained to the mothers that the use of these beverages tended to use up the strength of the children faster than the other foods could offset this evil of stimula- tions. 74 The Minimum Cost of Living POINTS TO BE CONSIDERED IN THE FORMULATING OF A NEW RATION ALLOWANCE 1. It is probable that no change need be made in the quantity of milk advised. 2. The allowance of fruits and vegetables seems to be satisfactory. 3. Some work should be done on the question of fixing a standard amount of bread. 4. There should be a sufficiently liberal total allowance to permit the families some freedom in satisfying individual wants in the matter of flavor and variety. CLASSIFICATION OF FOOD ACCORDING TO SIZE AND COMPOSITION OF FAMILY Considering the food expenditure according to the size of families, we have the following groups: Group 1 — three families of three individuals each, one spending 46% of the income for food, one spending 71%, and one 74% of the income for food. Group 2 — twenty-six families of four individuals each, one spending 36% of the income for food, one 37%), one 38%,, one 41%, two 43%, two 44%, The Seventy-five Dietaries in Detail 75 three 45%, three 47%, three 48%, two 49%, three 50%, one 51%, one 52%, one 57%, and one 62% of the income for food. Group 3 — twenty families of five individuals each, one family spending 38% of the income for food, one 39%, one 40%, one 42%, one 44%, two 49%, three 50%, three 51%, two 52%, two 53%, one 54%, one 55%, and one 63% of the income for food. Group 4 — fifteen families of six individuals each, one spending 41% of the income for food, one 42%, one 45%, two 46%, two 47%, one 48%, two 49%, one 50%, one 52%, one 54%, and two 57%, of the income for food. Group 5 — six families of seven individuals each, one spending 42% of the income for food, one 47%, one 49%, two 50%, and one 57% of the income for food. Group 6 — four families of six individuals each, one spending 45% of the income for food, one 47%, one 48%, and one 50% of the income for food. Group 7 — one family of eight individuals spend- ing 53% of the income for food. It is a generally accepted fact that large families can buy to better advantage than small ones. In 76 The Minimum Cost of Living this group the advantage has not seemed to be so great as might have been expected. The per- centage of expenditure for food remains surpris- ingly imiform. CLASSIFICATION OF FOOD EXPENDITURES ACCORD- ING TO INCOME Considered according to income the food ex- penditures of the famiUes may be divided as fol- lows: Group 1 — one family with an income of $200- $300 spending 71% oi this income for food. Group 2 — two families with an income of $300- $400, one spending 48% for food, the other 74% of the income for food. Group 3 — nine families with an income of $400- $500, one spending 38% for food, one 42%, one 48%, one 52%, one 56%, two 57%, one 62%, and one 63% of the income for food. Group Jf. — twenty-one families with an income of $500-$600, one spending 38% for food, one 41%, one 42%, one 43%, two 45%, one 46%, one 47%, one 48%, three 49%, three 50%, two 51%, two 52%, one 53%, and one 55%. Group 5 — eighteen famiUes with an income of The Seventy-five Dietaries in Detail 77 )-$700, one spending 36% for food, one 37%, one 39%, one 40%, two 44%, one 45%, two 47%, one 48%, one 49%, three 50%, one 51%, one 52%, one 53%, and one 54% of the income for food. Group 6 — twelve famihes with an income of $700-1800, one spending 43% for food, two 44%, one 45%, two 46%, one 47%, three 49%, one 50%, and one 53% of the income for food. Group 7 — seven famihes with an income of $800- $900, one spending 34% for food, one 41%, one 42%, two 48%, and two 50% of the income for food. Group 8 — two famihes with an income of $900- $1,000, one spending 53% and one 57% of the income for food. Group 9 — three famihes with an income of $1,000-$1,200, one spending 45% for food, one 47% and one 54% of the income for food. From the above it is evident that the income must go beyond the $1,200 amount before a rea- sonable decrease may be expected in the per- centage spent for food. CHAPTER IV The Clothing Budget The clothing item constitutes one of the most serious phases of the problem. The fact that necessity leads the housekeeper to plan first of all for the rent, second for the food, and third for incidentals, shifts the clothing expenditure into a secondary place. Circumstances make the lives of our unskilled working folk a series of vicious circles. The very lack of provision for various necessities contributes to the low state of health that, in turn, decreases the power to earn more. In the case of the clothing, even with careful planning, the sum left after rent, food, and in- cidentals have been paid for will barely clothe the working and school members of the family. The housekeeper herself must eke out with cast-off garments. Women frequently say — ''I have not had a hat, or a coat" — as the case may be — ''for ten years." Clean, comfortable and suitable clothing for the 78 The Clothing Budget 79 house mother would react favorably on the welfare of the entire family. The fact that many of our families depend on gifts is not an unmixed blessing. There is a natural shrinking from the wearing of clothing belonging to persons outside of the family circle, and this aversion should be respected. The following figures are perhaps one of the most significant in the entire study. In no case was the sum spent for clothing sufficient to provide properly for all members of the family. Later we shall have occasion to speak of the connection of this fact with the meagre appropriation for in- cidentals. Reference to the clothing estimate, page 13 will show, that the provision made was at the best scanty. The fact that not one of our families even approached this sum gives much food for thought. The percentage spent for clothing is so low in every case, irrespective of income, that it is not possible to do much in the way of making com- parisons. In classifying the clothing expenditures according to income, the families fall into the following groups : Group 1 — one family with an income of $200- $300 spending 21% of this income for clothing. 80 The Minimum Cost of Living Group 2 — two families with an income of $300- $400, one spending 7%, and one 8% of the income for clothing. Group 3 — eight families with an income of $400- $500, one spending 2%, one 3%, one 8%, one 11%, one 12%, two 13%, and one 18% of the income for clothing. Group If. — twenty-two families with an income of $500-$600, one spending 5%, one 7%, six 8%, three 9%, four 11%, two 12%, one 14%, and one 16% of the income for clothing. Group 5 — eighteen families with an income of $600-$700, one spending 4%, one 8%, two 7%, one 9%, four 10%, one 11%, two 12%, one 13%, two 14%, and three 18% of the income for clothing. Group 6 — twelve families with an income of $700-$800, one spending 4%, two 6%, one 8%, two 9%, two 10%, two 14%, and two 16% of the income for clothing. Group 7 — seven families with an income of $800-$900, one spending 7%, one 11%, two 13%, two 14%, and one 15% of the income for clothing. Group 8 — two families with an income of $900- $1,000, each spending 9% of the income for cloth- ing. The Clothing Budget 81 Group 9 — three families with an income of $1,000-11,200, one spending 7%, one 8%, and one 14% of the income for clothing. In fixing the sum allowed in the estimate for clothing, there was no attempt to set a standard. The Association made itself responsible only for the sirni required to meet actual living needs. It has already been stated that practically all of the families depended largely upon gifts of clothing. This fact is another reason for not depending upon the women's own expense accounts for help in setting a standard. Furthermore, it was not prac- tical to secure completely itemized accounts of clothing expenditures from any of the women. A good beginning was made in this direction, how- ever. Systematic record keeping was in itself a tax at first, and the workers made haste slowly here as in the case of the food work. Approxi- mately only 50% of the clothing expenditure was fully itemized. The remaining items were entered in the account books simply as "clothing." The entries for clothing that were itemized give details enough to furnish considerable help and information. For example, expenditures for both shoes and stockings were entered in detail in each 82 The Minimum Cost of Living case, as were those for "repairs." The following table is a fair average of the manner in which a clothing budget of $53.44 was spent. The family consisted of woman and three children, ten, nine and three years. The prices also give a good idea of those paid by all the families. CLOTHING BUDGET First Quarter Shoes $1.25 Shoes (2 pr.) $ 3.00 Stockings, 1 pr 10 Underwear 50 Apron .20 Rompers 25 Material 35 Underwear 1 . 00 CoUar 10 $6.75 Second Quarter Stockings, 2 pr 25 Rompers (2) 50 Stockings, 3 pr 35 Kimonas (2) 50 Stockings, 1 pr 10 Baby's hat 10 Underwear 50 Garters 05 Boy's shoes 1 .25 Stockings, 2 pr 25 2 dresses 96 Dresses (2) 98 Rompers 25 Stockings, 2 pr 20 Stockings (3 pr.) 30 Stockings, 2 pr 20 Child's dress 49 $7.23 Third Quarter Stockings, 1 pr $ .10 Underwear 35 Stockings, 2 pr 20 Undervest 19 Stockings, 3 pr 30 Rompers 25 Stockings, 6 pr 60 Rompers 25 The Clothing Budget 83 Third Quarter — Continued Dresses (2) $ .98 Material 30 Gloves 10 Underwear 49 Rubbers 35 Rompers 25 Shoes 1.00 Skirt 25 Ribbon 10 Rompers 25 Shirtwaist 98 Corsetcover $ .15 Waist 59 Shoes 1 . 50 Shoes, 2 pr 3 . 50 Repairs 50 Ribbon Hat . . . Waist . Dress . .20 .49 .10 .49 $14.81 Fourth Quarter Repairs S .50 Stockings, 15 pr $1 . 50 Waist 49 Dress 49 Underwear 20 Handkerchiefs 15 Material 50 Repairs 1 . 50 Shoes 1.25 Underwear 25 Rompers 25 Ribbon 20 Shoes, 2 pr 2 . 50 Material 25 Child's Shoes 50 Child's dress 49 Waist 49 Repairs 50 $5.33 $6.68 5.33 $12.01 Itemized total for year $40 . 80 Entered as " clothing" 12. 64 Grand total $53 . 44 The budget given is quoted verbatim from the housekeeper's own expense book and may be called typical of all the others. 84 The Minimum Cost of Living It is probable that this housekeeper would have come very near to the estimated amount for cloth- ing but for the fact that there was an unexpected falling off of $46.00 in the income of the family. In commenting on the necessary educational work the sewing teacher of the Home Economics Division writes as follows: ''The sum fixed in my estimate for clothing is not the ideal, but simply the best that can be done in the way of dividing a minimum income. The family clothing is usually sadly neglected — even the necessary things that are mentioned in the estimate are too often for- gotten. The children are seldom provided with change of undergarments, and nightclothes are seldom thought of. I have tried to teach the mothers the necessity for these things, and to show them that to a limited extent even these can be purchased with the average income of the family in this group. In each family my instruc- tion has included directions for keeping clean and self-respecting, as the result of thoughtful and careful buying." In the foregoing paragraph Mrs. Ditmas touches on a vital part of the work. It is true that the comparative cheapness of ready-made garments The Clothing Budget 85 must be considered. Experience and observation, however, lead to the conclusion that properly- directed lessons in selection of fabrics and making of garments are necessary if the family problem is to be dealt with adequately. Good results in nutrition depend directly on a budget that takes into consideration all the divi- sions of the family expenditures. CHAPTER V Fuel and Light In comparing what actually happened with the ''ideal division" spoken of on page 12 we realize that families living on a minimum basis can make only a very small provision for the item known as "operating expenses." In fact the mechanism of these households is so simple as to limit this item to the elemental ones of fuel and light. Study of the table on page 13 shows that very few of the famihes even approach the 8% of the income allowed in the ''ideal division." It has not been thought necessary to make tabulations as to the kinds of fuel used, since prac- tically all of the families have at least a one-burner gas stove, and most of them, a coal range that may be used in very cold weather. During all except the most extreme weather, the house- keepers carefully save fuel, and the families be- come accustomed to unheated rooms. One of the chief drawbacks in the tenement house life is the lack of provision for storage of 86 Fuel and Light 87 even moderate amounts of either coal or wood. This makes it necessary for many of the house- keepers to buy coal ''by the pail," and wood by the ''bundle." This fact makes it impossible to estimate the fuel needs on an economical basis. The actual saving on fuel and light when pur- chased by the ton is 50%. The expenditures for this item are surprisingly uniform. The average is for the entire group of Association families, approximately two thousand. When grouped according to the percentage of income that was spent for fuel and Ught, the families may be classified thus: Group 1 — one family with an income of $200- $300, spending 10% of the income for fuel and Hght. Group 2 — two families with an income of $300- $400, one spending 7%, and one 4% of the income for fuel and light. Group 3 — eight families with an income of $400- $500, three spending 8%, one 4%, one 6%, one 7%, one 3%, one 10% of the income for fuel and light. Group 4 — twenty-two families with an income of $500-$600, three spending 5%, three 3%, three 88 The Minimum Cost of Living 7%, three 6%, six 4%, one 2%, and one 1% of the income for fuel and Hght. Group 5 — eighteen famiUes with an income of $600-1700, six spending 5%, three 6%, three 2%, three 4%, one 8%, one 3%, and one 7% of the income for fuel and light. Group 6 — twelve families with an income of $700-$800, three spending 4%, five 5%, one 2%, one 3%, one 6%, and one 7% of the income for fuel and light. Group 7 — seven families with an income of $800-1900, two spending 5%, one 4%, one 6%, and three 7% of the income for fuel and light. Group 8 — two families with an income of $900- $1,000, one spending 5%, and one 7% of the in- come for fuel and light. Group 9 — three families with an income of $1,000-$1,200, two spending 3% and one 5% of the income for fuel and light. CHAPTER VI Incidentals When considered according to the percentage of income spent for incidentals, the families fall into the following groups : Growp 1 — one family with an income of $200- $300, spending 6% of the income for incidentals. Growp 2 — two families with an income of $300- $400, one spending 7% and one 5% of the income for incidentals, Growp 3 — eight famiUes with an income of $400- $500, one spending 10%, one 9%, two 6%, two 4%, one 8%, and one 12% of the income for incidentals. Group If. — twenty-two famihes with an income of $500-$600, four spending 9%, four 4%, one 7%, five 10%, three 6%, one 5%, two 8%, and two 3% of the income for incidentals. Group 5 — eighteen families with an income of $600-$700, one spending 18%, three 6%, four 9%, one 10%, one 11%, five 5%, one 3%, and two 8% of the income for incidentals. Group 6 — twelve families with an income of m 90 The Minimum Cost of Living $700-$800, one spending 12%, one 4%, two 6%, one 8%, three 9%, one 10%, two 5%, and one 7% of the income for incidentals. Group 7 — seven families with an income of S800-$900, one spending 14%, one 12%, two 4%, one 3%, one 17%, and one 8% of the income for incidentals. Group 8 — two families with an income of $900- $1,000, one spending 5%, and one 10% of the income for incidentals. Group 9 — three families with an income of $1,000-$1,200, one spending 9%, and two 8% of the income for incidentals. As in the case of the clothing, it has been im- possible to use the expense account as a standard on this point. This was due to the fact that the budgets were made out on a basis which allowed for no margin. The expense books show several items common to all families. Church, household supplies, school suppHes, laundry materials and insurance are the principal ones. Forty-seven of the seventy- five expense accounts showed entries for recreation, usually tickets for the movies. The average ex- penditure for recreation is $.30 a week. Incidentals 91 The figures on page 51 will show how small a percentage of the income was available for in- cidentals. In families where large expenditures in this direction had to be made, the clothing item was invariably robbed. A typical expense account for incidentals is given here : Actual Expenditures for Sundries Family, 4 Individuals, $600-$700 Income Laundry weekly (.22) Church (.16) Thread Tooth powder Geography Matches Shoe polish Needles Knife Book Shoe polish Shoe polish Stamps Papers Clothing hooks Stamps Spending money Pictures Tooth paste Stamps Thread .$11.44 . 8.32 .10 .10 .10 .05 .10 .05 .10 .04 .10 .10 .08 .06 .05 .08 .03 .20 .10 .08 .02 Forward $21.30 Map for school . . . Pail Pictures Table cloth Joe's Club Stamps Pictures Paper Joe's Club Joe's Club weekly Stamps Cards Shelf paper 10 yds. sheeting . . Towels Postals Towels Shoe polish .10 .16 .20 .59 .05 .10 .20 .10 10 .05 .10 .15 .10 . 1.10 .66 .05 .15 .08 Moving expenses 5 . 50 $21.30 $30.84 92 The Minimum Cost of Living Forward $30.84 Mattress 3.24 Forward $36 . 54 Writing paper . . Tooth paste . . . Paper Writing paper . . Pleasure Picture Darning cotton . Envelopes School supplies . Shoe polish .... Stove polish . . . Hair cut Joe's Club Stamps Stamps Teakettle 1 pan Spoon holder. . , .10 .10 .07 .10 .40 .05 .05 .05 .10 .10 .05 .15 .05 .02 .10 .45 .37 .15 Matches Postals Postals Postals Bell Pictures Stamps Writing paper Embroidery . . Stamps Tooth paste . . Matches 05 07 02 03 05 40 11 15 16 04 10 05 Refrigerator 2 . 00 Stamps Tooth paste . . . Darning cotton Stamps Dues on book . Shoe polish . . . , .04 .10 .05 .04 .06 .10 $36.54 Total $40.16 Perhaps no other one point as this of a small allowance for sundries shows so well what it means to any family to be without at least a moderate margin. Families in the groups under discussion, those of the rank and file of wage earners, have much to give to our national life. The intensive work de- scribed in these pages has shown that it would be well worth while for neighborhoods and com- munities to undertake systematic cooperation for Incidentals 93 the purpose of building for future strength. Every family that learns to attain its potential best, physical, mental and spiritual, is a strong power. The problems of independent families are closely allied to those of the families under discussion. Conservation of all resources among independent families reduces to a minimum the number on the verge of the so-called poverty line. Someone has said that the essential difference between poverty and riches is — ''To be fifty dol- lars ahead, or fifty dollars behind." If this test were appKed to our seventy-five families only three would be above the poverty line. If, how- ever, we interpret the words ''poverty" and "riches" in the larger sense, we might hope that all families in the group were richer at the end of the year than at the beginning — richer in under- standing of their own needs, in formulating plans for meeting these needs, in the realization that each family had a place of its own to fill in the social scheme, and richer in courage to meet the task of preparing to fill this place. Printed in the United States of America 'HE following pages contain advertisements of books by the same author or on kindred subjects BY THE SAME AUTHOR Food for the Invalid and the Convalescent $0.75 A great many books of special menus have been published, but upon one and all the same comment may be made — they are too elaborate. They mean either the expenditure of too much money or too much time and patience. It has long been realized that there was a decided need for a book of few pages which shall concisely set forth simple, inexpensive meals from which the greatest amount of nutritive values may be obtained. This has been exactly Miss Winifred Stuart Gibbs's pur- pose in this work, a fitting sub-title for which might be "A Maximum of Nutrition, a Minimum of Expenditure." Be- ginning with a few general articles on how to buy food, how to keep food from spoiling, the kinds of food to eat, the ne- cessity of good cooking and how to cook. Miss Gibbs passes rapidly to her two main considerations, the preparation of the various classes of food and the combinations of food into special menus and diets. In the first part, drinks, liquid foods, soups, meats, fats, fish, eggs, cereals, breads, vegetables, fruits and desserts are considered, while in the second part the menus are divided into three classes, those for the healthy, for children, and for the sick and convalescent. THE MACMILLAN COMPANY Publishers 64-66 Fifth Avenue New York Feeding the Family By MARY SWARTZ ROSE Illustrated, $2.10 This is a clear and concise account in simple every-day terms of the ways in which modern knowledge of the science of nutrition may be applied in ordinary life. The food needs of the different members of the typical family group — men, women, infants, children of various ages — are discussed in separate chapters, and many concrete illustrations in the form of food plans and dietaries are included. The problems of the housewife in trying to reconcile the needs of different ages and tastes at the same table are also taken up, as are the cost of food and the construction of menus. A final chapter deali with feeding the sick. "The volume is so simply and entertainingly written that it cannot but be enjoyed by anyone interested in the planning or preparation of household meals, and it would be difficult to imagine a more helpful book to put into the hands of a reader desiring information along such lines." — Trained Nurse. THE MACMLLIAN COMPANY Publishers 64-66 Fifth Avenue New York Chemistry of Food and Nutrition By henry C. SHERMAN, Ph.D. Professor in Columbia University Cloth, i2mo, viii + 355 pages, $1.50 The purpose of this volume is to present the principles of the chemistry of food and nutrition with special refer- ence to the food requirements of man and the considera- tions which should underhe our judgment of the nutritive values of food. The food is here considered chiefly in its nutritive relations. " A compact compendium of information based upon the most recent researches." — The Nation. "It is a real pleasure to call attention to Dr. Sherman's work, which is excellent. . . . Not too long, nor too tech- nical." — Johns Hopkins Hospital Bulletin. " A veritable treasure to the student of dietetics." — Chicago Record-Herald. THE MACMILLAN COMPANY Publishers 64-66 Fifth Avenue New York Human Foods By harry SNYDER, B.S. Professor of Agricultural Chemistry, University of Minnesota, and Chemist of the Minnesota Agricultural Experiment Station Cloth, i2mo, illustrated, 362 pages, $1.25 A discussion of the composition and physical properties of foods, the main factors which affect their nutritive value, etc. Dairy Chemistry By harry SNYDER, B.S. Illustrated, igo pages, $1.00 "The book is a valuable one which any dairy farmer, or, indeed, any one handling stock, may read with profit." — Rural New Yorker. Milk and Its Products By henry H. wing Professor of Dairy Husbandry in Cornell University New Revised Edition, with new illustrations, cloth, i2mo, $1.50 The revolution in dairy practice, brought about by the introduction of the centrifugal cream separator and the Babcock test for fat, by a more definite knowledge regarding the various fermentations that so greatly influence milk, and the manufacture of its products, have demanded the publication of a book that shall give to the dairyman, and particularly to the dairy student, in simple, concise form, the principles underlying modern dairy practice. Such has been Professor Wing's purpose in this work. This is not a new edition of the au- thor's very successful volume pubHshed under the same title many years ago ; it is, in reality, an entirely new book, having been wholly reset and enlarged by the addition of new matter, both text and illustrations. The author's aim has been at all times to give the present state of knowledge as supported by the weight of evidence and the opinions of those whose authority is highest. THE MACMILLAN COMPANY Publishers 64-66 Fifth Avenue New York The New Public Health By HIBBERT WINSLOW HILL Of the Institute of Public Health, London, Ontario, Canada Cloth, i2ttw, $1.25 Dr. EQll has analyzed the revolutionary changes that have taken place in the public attitude toward the public health, and studied the problem of the public apathy to constructive sanitation. His new book is a survey of the field, tracing first the differences between the old attitude and the new, and second, pointing out the actual achievements in public and individual defense against infection and contagion. The book discusses m detail the work of the PubUc Health Engineer, Statistician, and Laboratory, particularly in refer- ence to the pubUc health of the future, and describes the administration and application of the principles and methods which research has discovered and developed in recent years. Tuberculosis, scarlet fever, and venereal diseases receive especially full treatment. The book is optimistic, constructive, and enthusiastic ; it gives at once a sound working knowledge of what has been done and a practical program for procedure in the future ; it is authoritative and founded on long actual experience. " The way is clear, what remains is to follow it ; the method is known, what remains is to carry it out ; the thing we, as a race, for centuries have prayed for, can be done; all that remains is to do it. Each generation of Americans pays now for infectious diseases ten billion dollars at the least, and has the diseases, too. Why not pay one-tenth this sum and rid ourselves of them forever ? THE MACMILLAN COMPANY Publishors 64-66 Fi£th Avenue New York This book isDUT^ I^C SOUjHERN REGIOf\;AL LIBRARY FACILITY AA 000 959 396 3 r ^^" -LES 'AL SCHOOL UNIVERSITY of CALltUKix; AT LOS ANGELES UBRARY STATE KOHMAL SCIICOL T.OS AI^'GELES. CaUFORMT^ i«l