NA 093 ■64m Di Oi 0! 0! 1\ 3; 9; 1 i 9i Oi MEDIAEVAL TOWN PLANNING A LECTURE DEUVKRED AT •HE |OHN KVLANDS LIBRAHY ON THE IjTH DECEMBER. 1916 T F. lOl'T, M.A., F.B.A. BISHOP FRASER fKOKfiSSOK OI MEDIA VAI ANJ) ECCLliSlASTICAL HISTORY I.\ THE u;^r EksiTY oi- m/w-.chksiek Repyinul from '' J he iliillctiu of the John Rylands Library Vui. . ?'o I, AprH'Aiigust, 1917 MANCHESTER: THF. \]\[\\ t..,S, .? LIME GROVE, OXFORD UOAD. LONC... EN AND CO., 39 PAThkNOSTEk ROW. LONDON, La... . YORK, iJOMJJAY, CALCJTTA, ANi; MADRAS. BERNa. J) QUARITCH, n GRAFTON STREET, LONDON, W. MCMXVII Y AT Nbi THE LIBRARY OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES i Street I, W. l/v ./ MEDIEVAL ^ ' TOWN PLANNING A LECTURE DELIVERED AT THE JOHN RYLANDS LIBRARY ON THE 13TH DECEMBER, 1916 3 BY T. F. TOUT, M.A., F.B.A. BISHOP ERASER PROFESSOR OF MEDIEVAL AND ECCLESIASTICAL HISTORY IN THE UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER Reprinted from " The Bulletin of the John Rylands Library " Vol. 4, No. I, April- August, 191 7 MANCHESTER: THE UNIVERSITY PRESS, 12 LIME GROVE, OXFORD ROAD. LONGMANS, GREEN AND CO., 39 PATERNOSTER ROW, LONDON, E.G., NEW YORK, BOMBAY, CALCUTTA, AND MADRAS. BERNARD QUARITCH, 11 GRAFTON STREET, LONDON, W. MCMXVII Tc ■ MEDI/EVAL TOWN PLANNING.^ By T. F. tout, M.A., F.BA. BISHOP FRASER PROFESSOR OF MEDI/EVAL AND ECCLESIASTICAL HISTORY IN THE UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER. NOWADAYS the phrase town planning is dinned repeatedly into our ears. A generation, tending more and more to concentrate itself into great cities, is constantly told that town planning is the remedy for many of the most obvious evils of existence in the towns we are familiar with. An eminent architect told a Manchester audience some live years ago, that town planning means " the application to a town of that process of ordered forethought which we habitually apply to individual buildings "." It is because we have neglected to apply to our towns as wholes that process of looking ahead, which self-interest imposes on us when we build a house for ^ourselves, that our cities have grown up anyhow, and have in too many trcases become mere rabbit warrens of disorderly alleys and over- ^crowded houses. And this state of things, barely tolerable in his- ^ torical towns of moderate size, becomes absolutely unendurable in the overgrown cities which are the special feature of our modern civilization. It cannot be denied that our town planning enthusiasts have much reason on their side. They are never more right than when they reprobate the haphazard way in which our modern British cities have grown up. We of the north have very special reasons for lamenting the want of imagination shown by the builders of the great towns of Lancashire and Yorkshire. Perhaps it would be truer to say that there have been few builders of towns, but an infinite number of builders of individual houses and streets. What we most suffer from is the lack of adequate control on the part of some general authority, so ^ An elaboration of the lecture delivered in the John Rylands Library, 13 December, 1916. ^ Paul Waterhouse, Old Towns and New Needs, the Warburton lecture for 1912 (Manchester Uniyersity Press, 1912), pp. 1-2. 3 437207 4 THE JOHN RYLANDS LIBRARY that each individual has been left to pursue his own interest wherever he conceived it to lie. The reasons for this neglect are written large in the political and social history of Britain, though we might also perhaps plead that there have been more numerous exceptions to this rule than modern architects and up-to-date social reformers sometimes imagine. But neither circhitects nor social reformers are as a rule historians, and they seldom know accurately either the historical conditions, which made town planning so difficult, or the extent to which these difficulties have been overcome. Even the dark days of the late eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries show notable schemes of town planning, of which the best is doubtless the "new town" of Edinburgh. But faint suggestions of similar motives can surely be seen in the regular align- ments and straight-cut streets which mark the early procession of modern Manchester southward from the original nucleus, and the first climbings of modern Liverpool eastward up the hillside outside the narrow limits of the mediaeval town. Again old new quarters of London, such as the Duke of Bedford's Bloomsbury Estate, with its straight streets and leafy squares, are distinct evidences of the applica- tion by a great landlord of prudent forethought in directing the development of a town quarter springing up on the soil which he owns. Gower Street, which to Ruskin was the abomination of aesthetic desolation, the redudio ad absurduni of the hideous pro- cess that began with the Renascence, suggests to the town planner the bright promise of a future of well-ordered cities in which men may live in comfort and health. I would not like to say that either Ruskin or the town planner were wholly right or wholly wrong. I simply indicate in passing two rather different points of view. We must refuse to traverse insidious bypaths, and get back to real business. My task to-night is not with the town of the future, or even with the town of the present, or the town of the recent past. Dryasdust, as is well known, is content to pursue his hobbies with a minimum amount of concern for the world he lives in, or for the world in which his descendants may live in. Yet even Dryasdust may find some pleasure in approaching his remote studies with some reference to the fashion in which the men of the period which he delights to study have overcome problems not dissimilar to those which vex the souls of his own age. When all the world is talking of town planning, the historic aspects of that problem may well occupy the attention of MEDI/EVAL TOWN PLANNING 5 the historian. It is natural nowadays for a mediaevalist to interest himself in mediaeval town planning. I cannot flatter myself that what I have to tell you to-night will give much practical guidance to those who are anxious to make the Manchester of the future better ordered and more wisely planned than the Manchester of the past. But it is not altogether unpractical to realize that remote ages had to grapple with the same problems as those which we ourselves are trying to meet, and it is eminently practical, if we are able, as I think we shall be able, to draw the moral that the methodical organization of town construction can only be attained when the impulses of the individual are adequately controlled by the corporate v^dll of the community, and when the immediate advantage of the moment is subordinated to the ultimate welfare of the future. Normal mediaeval conditions were not particularly favourable to town planning. Both the small size of the ordinary mediaeval state and the limited control which mediaeval man had over material resources made it more difficult in those days to plan out a great town than it is for the great nations of the modern world with their almost unbounded power of harnessing nature to their service. In some ways we ap- proach modern conditions more nearly if we go back to a more remote period, and particularly if we go back to the great days when the whole civilized west was ruled by the Roman Empire, or if we revert to the still more distant time when the kingdoms of Alexander and his successors compelled the near east to submit to a veneer of western civilization, and by so doing made the Roman Empire possible. What history teaches us as to ancient town planning is admirably set forth in a little book which Prof. Haverfield of Oxford published some four years ago.^ I cannot do better than refer those of you, who would wish to go back even farther than I can do to-night, to Mr. Haverfield's lucid and orderly marshalling of the facts of this subject so far as illustrated by the Graeco- Roman world. Into the origins of town planning we have no need to follow him, for they have no conceivable relation to later times. Yet it is interesting to know that scholars have seen suggestions of town planning in the remote antiquity of the bronze age, and that Babylon ^ F. Haverfield, Ancient Town Planning (Oxford University Press, 1913). 6 THE JOHN RYLANDS LIBRARY as described, perhaps wrongly described, by Herodotus, was laid out with straight streets running parallel to or at right angles with each other. Town planning of a more modern sort begins in the fifth cen- tury B.C., when Hippodamus of Miletus laid out Piraeus, the port of Athens, in a form as rectangular as the irregularity of the ground allowed. But the ordinary Greek city had no plan at all, and Athens itself was in striking contrast to its port. Its glory was in its wonder- ful public buildings, its temples, and its colonnades ; its shame was in its fortuitous congestion of rude hovels, separated by tortuous lanes, which rivalled the squalor and disorder of a modern oriental city. But the cities of Greece grew and were not made. It was only when colonies were founded, or cities, like Piraeus, were made all of a piece, that the town planner has his chance. The town planner's opportunity came when Alexander and his successors plastered the near east with Alexandrias, Antiochs, Seleucias and Pergamons, destined from their foundation to be leading cities of a great empire, capitals of highly centralized despotisms. Yet the cities of the Hellenistic and Macedonian ages have no lesson for us, since such as are still great cities now represent not the regular proportions of their founders' designs but the picturesque confusion of a modern Turkish town, which has forgotten its origin under the long pressure of its fierce barbarian masters. It was otherwise when the Roman Empire began to follow the example of the Macedonians by setting up, first in Italy, and afterwards in the conquered provinces of the west, colonies and municipalities whose sites have often been continuously inhabited ever since by civilized man. Their rectangular proportions, their straight, narrow streets, their regular blocks of building testify to the symmetry and method of their designers, and approach the simplicity of the Roman camp from which many of them arose. What Roman towTi planning was like can perhaps best be realized by him who wanders through the straight and narrow streets of the excavated portions of Pompeii, the more so when he realizes that exceptional circumstances made Pompeii one of the more irregular of the towns of ancient Italy. But what Vesuvius did for Pompeii, the Teutonic invasions did more effectively for most of the cities of the old Roman world. The barbarians from the north utterly broke down the continuity of Roman town life. Very few scholars nowadays believe that there was any organic connexion between MEDI/EVAL TOWN PLANNING 7 Roman municipal institutions and those of the middle ages and modern times. It is almost the same with sites as with institutions. Prof. Haverfield demonstrates to us that in our island of Britain the well- thought-out Roman scheme which made little Silchester, not only a well-planned town but a garden city on a small scale, did not sur- vive the coming of the Angles and Saxons. Even when the barbarian conquerors crouched for shelter behind the old Roman walls of a derelict city, they reconstructed the interior of the town after their own fashion. Prof. Haverfield will not even allow that the apparently Roman plan of Chester and Gloucester, where four straight streets, running from four chief gates, meet together at a centre, has anything Roman about it. The main streets of Chester and Gloucester, London and Colchester are mediaeval, not Roman, in their direction and alignment. At Colchester this is particularly clear, not only in the town area, but in its approaches. To the west, as Mr. Round tells us, the English settlers mapped out the open fields of the urban agricultural community which replaced the Roman city, and covered up with their crops the great Roman cemetery and the abandoned Roman road to London, while to its north a new highway led direct to the gates of the med- iaeval town.^ Though a Roman gate still affords access to Lincoln from the north, the survival of a Roman line of road in continuation of it, through the city itself, is as likely to be the result of the topo- graphical limitations of a narrow hill site as it is of historical survival. Whatever town planning the Romans brought to Britain, none of it has survived to afford any lesson to us. Its very existence has only been revealed by modern archaeological research. The case is the same, Mr. Haverfield tells us, in the great Roman towns of Southern France. Buildings have survived, but never the plan of the town. It is only in Italy that our authority can see any continuous survivals of Roman town planning in such instances as the Roman quarter of Turin. Yet even here the modern historian is tempted to ascribe the admirable regularity of the plan of that best planned of the historical cities of the peninsula not so much to the Romans as to the fostering care of the house of Savoy, ever anxious to embellish its ^ See Mr. J. H. Round's remarkable inaugural presidential address to the Essex Archaeological Society, " On the Sphere of an Archaeological Society," reprinted from the Transactions of that Society, XIV. 4, and especially the map and the remarks on p. II. 8 THE JOHN RYLANDS LIBRARY capital in comparatively recent times. Be this as it may, it remeiins that whatever Roman town planning has survived has come to us through the long centuries of the middle ages. We have at last got to our real subject, but it was necessary for our purpose to appreciate the deep gulf that history has dug between the town planning of antiquity and later ages. With the middle ages we have to start afresh, and for many centuries we see conditions very inimical to town life in all its forms. While the Greek and Roman thought that the happy life could only be lived in the city, the nascent civilization of the middle ages was of the country not of the tovm. Its unit was the court and manor of the feudal landlord, the homesteads and farm buildings of his humbler tenants. There was neither the good government necessary for ordered town life, nor the commerce which made it economically possible for great hordes of men to dwell together in an urban area. When men still gathered together in little town communities, it was not by reason of any sentimental preference for civic life, but because the needs of protection and defence forced them to dwell side by side on some fortified hilltop, where they might save themselves from pirates and plunderers. But for that every man would have dwelt hard by the fields and meadows which assured him his subsistence. It follows that as there were few towns there was no town planning in those dark ages which lay between the fall of the Roman world and the development of that well-marked type of civilization which we call mediaeval. In those ages we must go to the great monarchies of the east if we would seek for new examples of town planning, as for instance at Baghdad, planned so well by one of the greatest of the Khalifs that it became the greatest commercial centre of the world of Islam. But it is even more improbable that these oriental town planners were imitated by westerns in later ages than that mediaeval statesmen and architects consciously followed the tovm plans of Roman days.^ By the eleventh century the dark ages were drawing to a close. Strong kings and princes arose who ruled roughly but effectively over ^ See on this subject a summary of Prof. Unwin's interesting lecture on " Eastern Factors in the Growth of Modern Cities ; Baghdad and Saint Nicholas," in Journal of the Manchester Egyptiayi and Oriental Society^ 1915-16, pp. 13-17. I appreciate the learning and admire the ingenuity and imagination of my colleague, but I cannot feel quite convinced as to the soundness of his general thesis. MEDI/EVAL TOWN PLANNING 9 large dominions. With comparatively settled order a relatively high standard of well-being v^as insured. The result was the wonderful progress and prosperity of the twelfth century. And with this revival of strong rule came two results that boded well for tovms. The successful emperor, king, or duke wished to hold down his conquered enemies, and promote among them his own ideals of civilization. The improved material prosperity gave once more a chance for trade and industry. And from conquest and commerce alike, there necessarily arose a new need for towns. Some towns, including most of the great cities of history, grow ; others on the other hand are made. And the process of town making is as legitimate as the process of constitution making. Prof. Pollard in a paradoxical moment has lately told us that constitutions that develop are better than constitutions that spring from the brain of the legislator.^ The answer is that it all depends on the constitutions. This is the case with towns as well as constitutions. Under certain conditions both alike must be made, or they do not come into existence at all. We have now got to one of those periods of history in which, as in the Macedonian age, the conscious creation of towns on a large scale was both a political and economic necessity. With the " fever for founding towns " that marked the twelfth and thirteenth centuries the golden age of mediaeval town planning set in. It is to this period that we have chiefly to address ourselves. The political necessity for town making arose earlier than the economic need. In the humble beginnings of the new towns of the middle ages military considerations were always paramount. A strong ruler conquered a district adjacent to his old dominions, or wished to defend his frontier against a neighbouring enemy. He built rude fortresses and encouraged his subjects to live in them, so that they might undertake the responsibility of their permanent defence. Thus arose the " boroughs" which the successors of Alfred the Great " timbered " along the boundary line between their West Saxon inherit- ance and the Danelaw. Thus began the towns which the Carolingian conquerors set up in Saxony, and, later on, the fortresses of the same type which were erected by the Saxon emperors beyond the Elbe in the ^ See his " Growth of an Imperial Parliament " in History, I. 129 et seq., and the criticisms on it in the same periodical by Prof. Ramsay Muir and Mr. D. O. Malcolm, ibid. I. 193-214. 10 THE JOHN RYLANDS LIBRARY .^ Slavonic districts which they were initiating into the priceless blessings of an early form of German Kulhir. This primitive Drang nach Osten came to a head in the thirteenth century, when it had not only teuton- ized the lands between the Elbe and the Oder, but planted German colonies all through the East Baltic lands, through Poland and its sub- ject states. For us the chief result was the setting up of new tov^s, military outposts of the Teutonic power, whose soldier-burgesses were to keep the Slavs and Letts in their places. In the new Teutonic towns in Slavonic lands, we have one great group of artificially-made towns, which, as the impulse became stronger, grew into something beyond mere fortresses. Their clergy and monks dragooned the rude natives into adopting the teachings of the church. The traders, who followed the soldiers and priests, found a profitable occupation in exploiting their economic necessities. The result was towns of sufficient size to demand some sort of planning on the part of their founders. Particulars of this process are very little knov^, or at any rate are little accessible to a lecturer writing in war-time in Manchester. But It is certain thaft not only were the older cities of Prussia, of Silesia, of Poland, and of Lithuania the result of such methods, but that the laying out of the oldest parts of many of these towns bears witness to this day of the rectilineal alignments and the rectangular blocks of allotments common to the town planners of every age. Thus Breslau, 1 now for centuries a thoroughly Germanized town, was in its origin a Teutonic outpost among the Slavs of Silesia, and shows in its plan the I marks of its origin. It is the same with the towns of Prussia, \ Livonia, and Poland. We see it, for instance, in the disposition of \ Breslau, and repeated in Cracow, the old capital of Poland. These influences perhaps went even farther east. Lithuania long resisted all Teutonic and Christian influences, and at last only took them filtered through Polish channels. Yet in Vilna, the chief city of Lithuania, the orderly ground plan of the central parts, stands in such contrast to the oriental disorder of its suburbs, that I feel constrained to show it to you along with the plan of Breslau. It is fair to add that both the Breslau and Vilna plans come from a seventeenth century book of towTi plans, which may owe something to the imagination of the map maker, who gave more and more flight to his fancy the farther he got eastwards. When he arrived as far east as Russia imagination exhausted itself with Moscow, and his plans of other Russian towns medit^val town planning 1 1 are more or less pretty pictures which give no guidance to the topo- grapher. Let us turn to other aspects of our subject which are easier to trace and which have more direct relation to ourselves and our own history. The process, which pushed forward the Teutonic cause from 1 the Elbe to the Oder and from the Oder to the Vistula and 1 Dvina, was repeated whenever a conqueror came to a new country with followers eager for land-grabbing. We see it in England after the Norman Conquest when the French-speaking king and his French barons set up numerous little towns in their demesne lands and at- tracted settlers to them by the promise of liberties, such as towns in I their own lands beyond the Channel had long enjoyed. Such new^ towns were specially numerous in the north and west, where the Celts of Wales and Cumbria had as little power of resistance to the mail- clad knights as the Slavs of Silesia or the Letts of Livonia had to the chivalry of Germany. Thus it was that numerous boroughs were called into being to receive the laws of Breteuil, an obscure town on the Norman-French border, just as the outposts of Germany in the east had been granted the laws of Magdeburg. The western towns, th oldest Welsh towns, and many Irish towns arose in this manner. But few of the Noi man foundations of this type attained much success, and none, so far as I know, give evidence of mediaeval town planning. We must wait for the thirteenth century before we get that in England. But before we deal with thirteenth century examples in our own land, let us turn to France, the one continental country that was in intimate connexion with ourselves all through the middle ages, and which, both as friend and foe, profoundly modified the course of our national history. During the twelfth century the French monarchy became as powerful as the German kingdom under the Saxons and Salian rulers had ever been. It remained surrounded by a ring of vassal states, whose lords were powerful magnates, like the Duke of Normandy, the Duke of Aquitaine or the Count of Toulouse. Each of these was as com- petent, within his sphere, to maintain order and uphold good-peace as the King of Paris himself. Between the overlord and the great feuda- tories there was natural enmity and a constant struggle for supremacy. In the long run the Crown prevailed, and even in the south, where men spoke a different tongue and thought different thoughts from the 12 THE JOHN RYLANDS LIBRARY Frenchmen of the north, the Crown uhimately acquired ascendancy. The conquest of the south by the northern kings was faciUtated by the fact that the south, especially the district of which Toulouse was the capital, had adopted the outspoken i heresies of the Albigensians. This enabled a crusade to be preached against the Languedocian heretics, and the conquest of the south was made possible by the crusaders from the north who came to fight, alike for the faith and for themselves. When the south was subdued after a bloody struggle, it lay open to northern exploitation. Thus, ere the thirteenth century was very old, a land depopulated and exhausted by war, rich in re- sources, and sullenly hostile to its conquerors, was ready for the victor to work his will on. There were towns of great antiquity, populous and wealthy, in the conquered south, but these had for the most part won for themselves a municipal independence which still survived the conquest and made them as hostile as, and more effective than, the beaten nobles to resist the newcomers. Here we have the conditions of the Slavonic lands after the German Conquest, or of Britain after the Norman Conquest essentially repeated, save only that here the conqueror was not only stronger but ruder than his victims, and that the vanquished land was full of flourishing and populous cities. } The remedy was the same as on ftX me eastern marches of Germany. From the wholesale and long-con- ' ' tinned application of this remedy arose the villeneuves and bastides of Southern France, the best examples of town planning known to the I middle ages. The word bastide, which in Northern France takes the form of bastille, means simply a fortress. Here, as in the far east and in the far north, the primary motive for the new foundation was military. Some bastides were set upon the frontiers as barrier fortresses. Others were erected over against an old town likely to give the new lords trouble. All were possible refuges to the countryside, when invasion or civil war came. But the economic motive loomed large from the first. It paid a lord to attract settlers and traders to his own town, and to divert commerce from the towns which .. were self-governing or subject to his rivals. Though bastides were I strewn so thickly over the map that only a small proportion be- * came real towns, yet the rarity of success mattered the less since MEDI/EVAL TOWN PLANNING 13 the profits of success were great, and the risks of failure were incon- I siderable. The origin of the bastides of Languedoc is to be found in the days before the northern conquest when monasteries, possessing large tracts of lands and no tenants to till them, attracted settlers to their estates by setting up little fortresses for them to live in and investing the inhabitants with modest immunities. The greatest princes of the south, the Counts of Toulouse, followed this policy on a larger scale, and thus everything was easy when St. Louis, King of France and his brother Alfonse, Count of Poitiers, the inheritors of the results of the northern conquest of Languedoc, became the pioneers of a more conscious movement towards town plantation. On that part of the spoils of Languedoc which fell to the king himself, St. Louis set up new towns of his own. The rest of the country of Toulouse went to Alfonse of Poitiers, the son-in-law and successor of the last native Count of Toulouse, and in this region he worked on the same lines as his brother as a founder of bastides. If the great king's bastides were the more enduring and important, those of Alfonse were by far the more numerous. In a later generation, subsequent kings of France inherited both brothers' work, and carried on their policy of town making. Their example was followed by all the remaining feudal potentates of the south, notably by our Edward I, who in early man- hood received from Henry III the Duchy of Gascony to support his state, and who, even before he was King of England, stepped into the place left vacant by Alfonse's death in 1270, as the most active founder of bastides of his age. Whoever was the builder, the bastides were devised after the same 1 fashion. A site was procured, either on the founder's own lands, or more often by arrangement with some local lord or prelate, who would gladly surrender some of his nominal rights over an unprofit- able estate on the chance of its being protected and developed by co- operation between him and his powerful suzerain. When the site was got, a name was chosen. Sometimes it suggested the novelty ; of the experiment, ^ sometimes the liberties promised to the colonists,"^ sometimes the security it offered,^ sometimes a special feature of its ^ Villeneuve. " Villefranche. ' Sauveterre, Salvatierra, La Sauve, Le Salvetat, Monsegur, La Garde. 14 THE JOHN RYLANDS LIBRARY \ site/ sometimes the name of its founder, ^ sometimes a famous town of \ a distant region that made some special appeal to the projector/ al- ■ ways something either rather conventional or slightly bizarre. Then \ the founder or his agent set up a pale* to mark the central point of j the new settlement. I Then the town planning began. When the ground allowed it, a f rectangular or square site was selected as the easiest to arrange.^ But though this was the normal shape, we have bastides of all sorts of eccentric outlines, as for example the exceedingly irregular Sauveterre de Guienne, shaped almost like a pear.^ In any case the new town was protected always by a wall and ditch, rarely by a citadel or castle in addition. Any such defensive works were commonly erected at the charge of the founder. The fortifications and the site were in fact the chief contributions of the founder to the making of the town. Whatever the general outline of the bastide, the internal dispositions were always on the same principles.' Each new town was plotted out in squares or oblongs, by straight streets, crossing each other at right angles, the main thoroughfares leading direct from the chief gates to the centre of the town. Here the important arteries of traffic, the carrteres, or carriage ways, met together in a central square, the streets themselves being often carried across each side of the square under arcades formed by a projection of the first floors of the surround- ing houses/ though in other cases the covered arcades which were a ^ Miranda, Miranda, Beaumont, Mirabel, Miramont, Montjoie, Aigues Mortes. ' Libourne (Roger of Leybourne), Nicole (Henry of Lacy, Earl of Lin- coln), La Bastide de Baa (Bishop Burnell of Bath), Beaumarches (Eustace of Beaumarchais, seneschal of Philip 111). ^ Cordes, Grenade, Hastingues, Pampelonne, Cologne, Plaisance, Fleurance, Barcelonne, Boulogne. * Hence the " new town " of Pau (le pal) which became later the capital of Beam. * This is best illustrated at Montpazier, see the plan and description in Didron, Annales Archeologiques, reproduced in plate III. See also plate IV of Cadillac (Gironde). ^ See its plan in Haverfield, Ancie?ii Town Planning, p. 144. ' This is well seen in the plan of Beaumont in Perigord (Dep. Dor- dogne), figured in Didron, Annates Archeologiques, VI. 78, where the re- stricted dimensions of the low plateau on which the little bastide was erected compelled all the blocks of houses to be arranged askew. For other analogous irregularities see the plan of Ste. Foy in ibid. X. 270. s « - < MEDI/EVAL TOWN PLANNING 15 general feature of the central piazza were of more restrained propor- tions. In the area of the square the chief public building, the town hall, was commonly placed, the ground floor, open at the sides, being used as a covered market place, while business was transacted in rooms raised above it on pillars. This plan is still to be seen in the few surviving ancient town halls of smaller boroughs in our own country, notably in the west of England. Round about the square the principal inhabitants erected their houses in the most convenient and open sites available for them. Hard by the chief square was a smaller square wherein the parish church was placed. Lesser churches and minor public buildings were scattered through the town according to accident. Each settler received a block of land, wherein to erect his dwelling. Behind it was generally ample space for a garden. The obligation to build a house at his own expense was the chief pledge of the good faith and financial stability of the settler. In new societies, where there was little social disparity, each house- allotment was of similar size, as rectilineal in shape as everything else in the bastide. But it looks as if important people often got several allotments assigned to them, as was certainly the case in the English and Welsh towns formed after this model. It was carefully stipu- lated by the founder that the settlers' houses should be run up within a reasonable period. Thus in one group of bastide charters ^ one-third of the house was to be finished within the first year, and two- thirds within the second year. If this were done, the structure could be completed at the proprietor's discretion. But every householder was bound to build over the whole street-front of his allotment, and sometimes also a minimum breadth of the house, backwards from street to garden, was also stipulated. As the normal townsman was still primarily a cultivator, every settler received a grant of arable and pas- ture land, sometimes too an orchard or vineyard, in the neighbourhood of the town. These had been waste lands in many cases, and were now to be brought into cultivation by the labour of the new population thus at- tracted to the soil. As an inducement towards cutting down wood- land and turning it into agricultural land, bastide builders were allowed ^ See the Charter of Saint Osbert in the diocese of Bazas in Roles Gascons, II. 13 (1276). This clause was repeated in the Cheirter of Sauveterre, Gironde, ibid. ll. 200. 16 THE JOHN RYLANDS LIBRARY to take from the lord's forest the timber from which their houses were mainly constructed.^ The whole scheme was on a small scale. The main roads are to us excessively narrow, but the middle ages seldom used carts and carriages, and there was no problem of traffic congestion to be faced. Moreover in a southern climate narrow streets shaded the burgesses from the sun and protected them from the icy v^dnds which are the least pleasant form of the southern winter. The side streets were mere lanes, accessible at the best to a pack-horse or mule ; at the worst only traversable by the pedestrian. The bastide, even nowadays, is a picturesque place with a local colour and atmosphere of its own. It is nearly always small ; partly because mediaeval conditions made large towns almost impossible, and partly because bastide-{oMTi^vs\^ t; '-J ^ ^ -o -, 'A -^ ri:C^J^-S^7-U4C^| c; ui u^ ^ i; K^ UJ K^ ;= ^'^ r:i_;^ ;V=< ':^ K K -^^ H ^ .^^'' MEDIv^VAL TOWN PLANNING 21 1277/ but which a few years later was a flourishing bastide, the shire town of the new dependent county of Flint, which became a sort of Welsh extension of Edward's own Cheshire palatinate. Though modem industrialism has reared its hideous head all around, we can still make out the line of the streets, drawn at right angles from each other and leading up to the castle, majestic even in its ruin. A few miles farther west, Rhuddlan shows its castle, but there is little town planning now visible in the village that Edward wished to make a real town, and to which he desired that the Bishop of St. Asaph should transfer his see. But we must cross the Conway to see Edward's Welsh bastides at their best, to Conway itself wdth its glorious castle dominating both river and town. The triangular shape of the borough — the form of a Welsh harp is the " right way " of de- scribing it — has not prevented the geometrical planning of the streets and plots in rectilinear lines. Still better does the bastide plan come out in Carnarvon, a town that had more of a future before it, as the capital of North Wales, than its eastern sisters. These are the successes of the Edwardian policy ; the failures as in Gascony were even more numerous. Later than 1284 Edward set up a new castellated borough at Beaumaris, others were made by his son, as prince and king ; and still others by the Black Prince. Then in England as in Gascony town planning ceased by the middle of the fourteenth century. The king was not the only town founder in Wales. In Southern and Western Wales, the lords marcher con- tinued the policy which had begun in Norman days. Llewelyn himself strove as late as 1 273 to set up at Abermule a castle, town and market in rivalry to the castle, town and market of the king at Montgomery.^ We cure lucky in having more details as to the process by which these Welsh towns were made than we have of many of their continental elder brethren. Nearly every point that I have mentioned already as regards the Gascon group was reproduced in the North Welsh variety of the same type. The similarity of plan applied not only to the general outline but to the detailed plots assigned to the individual settlers. The " placeae " of Gascony are reproduced, even in name, ^ See for this J. G. Edwards, " The Name of Flint Castle " in English Historical Review, XXIX. 315 (1914). * Cal. Close Rolls, \in-9, p. 51. 11 THE JOHN RYLANDS LIBRARY in the little borough of Newborough in Anglesea, a foundation of Edward II, but they are more generally known as " burgages ", A comparison between the two groups will show that, while at Carnarvon and Criccieth the individual " burgage " was 80 x 60 feet, at Beaumaris there was the same length but only half the breadth, namely 40 feet. The charters of a gi'oup of Gascon towns of which that of Sauveterre de Guienne is first, assigned the settlers "places" of 24 x 72 feet,^ while at Valence d'Agen the places were either 24 x 60 or 36 X 60.^ It is not likely that a " foot" of exactly the same length was used in Gascony and England, but even allowing for this it is clear that the Gascon "place" was a smaller allotment than the north Welsh " burgage ". It naturally, therefore, paid a much lower rent. But the mass of the bastides were not likely to become more than agricultural villages, and the north Welsh towns were to be peopled by a dominant race, drawn from a distance and needing more induce- ment to accept the painful, if sometimes profitable, role of posing as pioneers of an alien civilization. In the same way any reputable person, serfs included, were welcomed in a bashde, while the Welsh borough was limited to free Englishmen, Jews, like Welshmen, being forbidden all entrance. An essential element in town planning is the selection of a good site on which a new foundation has a chance of attaining greatness. The Gascon bastides were scattered too thickly to make their positions anything but matters of accident, though sometimes, as in the case of Libourne, Edward or his agents showed a real eye for a site, marked out by nature for an important town. The maturer work of Edward in North Wales may well claim to have been distinguished by insight in the selection of good localities for potential towns. The nameless rock, or " the Flint," where Edward's earliest foundation arose, commanded the estuary of the lower Dee. Rhuddlan was the head of the navigation of the Clwyd. It prospered greatly until the increase in the size of ships, and the silting up of the river left the borough high and dry, so that the suggestion that the deserted village was ever a seaport seems to modern visitors ridiculous. The advantage of the site of Conway, dominating the passage of a broad river and providing access from the further bank to the mountain of Snowdonia, and the attractions of Carnarvon and Beaumaris, protecting the two ^ Roles Gascon, II. 13, 201. "^ Ibid. II. 209. - i - 1 5 = 5 = = s ? i- s ? E 1! c MEDI/EVAL TOWN PLANNING 23 banks of the Menai Straits, are obvious on the face of things. And that Edward took pains with his choice of sites is clear from the trouble lavished and the misunderstandings faced when he chose as the site of Conway the hallowed Cistercian monastery which was the favourite foundation of the Welsh princes, with the result that he was com- pelled to provide a new home for the monks higher up the stream in a position of less military and economic importance. When a bad site was chosen, such as that of Bere amidst a wilderness of hills in Merioneth, the town simply never came into existence. We may perhaps claim for Edward a touch of that instinct in choosing town sites which is a rarer gift for the town planner that the mechanical measuring out of straight lines and right angles in plotting the roads and " burgages " within the walls. To see this gift in perfection we must go back to the two great town planners of antiquity who have left their names in the Egyptian Alexandria and in Constantinople. The same insight marked Edward Is work on the rare occasions when, after the conquest of Gwynedd, he had an opportunity to plan new towns in his own English realm. Among his claims to fame is his foundation of Hull, or to give it its full title the Kingstown on the Hull, with Liverpool one of the very few of the greater historic towns of England that can boast, or lament, a founder. Two events had drawn Edward to the North. There was the Scottish trouble, which demanded his best efforts after 1 290 and brought him and the whole machinery of state to York for years on end. There was also the lapse to the Crown of the inheritance of the earls of Albemarle, whose great lordship of Holderness was thus made royal domain. Now the old port of Holderness was Ravenser, now buried beneath the sea, and already dropping by degrees into the muddy Humber. With the view of providing a successor to Ravenser, and a port more accessible from York and the interior, Edward chose a site where the little river Hull pours its waters into the Humber. The angle between the two rivers, just west of the Hull and north of the Humber, belonged to the monks of the neighbouring monastery of Meaux, and its advantages had already brought a few houses, ships and traders to the spot.^ But ^ Cal. Patent Rolls, 1281-92, pp. 270, 278, 354, and Cal. Close Rolls, 1288-96, pp. 9, 101, 261, show that there was some population and trade at Wyke before 1290 and that it was sometimes called Hull. In 1279 the monks of Meaux had a charter permitting a weekly market at Wyke {Cal, Charter Rolls, II. 214). .24 THE JOHN RYLANDS LIBRARY about February, 1293, Wyke, as it was then called, was a humble enough place, and it was therefore not hard for Edward to negotiate its exchange for other lands.' Once secure of the coveted position, he immediately set forth to found a new town upon it. Four months after the transfer, he gave Wyke the new name of the Kingstown on the Hull, and proclaimed two weekly markets there. A deviation of the Hull " gave it water protection on all sides, and provided for our own age a complete ring of docks, round the nucleus of the modern city. It was a new Libourne in a colder and flatter land. The site was laid out with Aquitanian regularity and the vast offices and warehouses that in the modern town now take up the narrow space between the docks and the Humber, and are still grouped round Edward's great church of the Holy Trinity, cannot altogether conceal from the historic tourist the fact that the oldest part of the modern town still follows the lines of a normal bastide, with its chess-board pattern, and its central market square on which abuts its chief church. A feature in the construction was that it was the first English town in which brick was the chief building material, much of Trinity Church, all the town gates, and many of the houses being, then or later, built of bricks.^ By 1 299 the time was ripe for a royal charter constituting Kingston a " free borough " wath extensive franchises.* So thoroughly did Edward provide for the needs of the new port that, like the bishops of Salisbury, he diverted and constructed high roads to give access to it.^ By a master-stroke of policy he enticed the chief merchant of Ravenser, William de la Pole, to throw his interest into Kingston by granting him the manor of Myton, included in the King's purchase ^ Chron. de Melsa, II. 186-92, tells the story from the Meaux point of view. ■' Cal. Close Rolls, 1 288-96, p. 292. This order of 1 July, 1 293, to pro- claim throughout Yorkshire the holding of two markets a week in the " King's town of Kingston-on-Hull " is the first evidence of the new name that I have come across. ^ Leland, Itmerary, I, 49-50, ed. L. T. Smith. ^ It is in Cal. Charter Rolls, II. 475-6, dated 1 April, 1299. Ravenser was compensated by a duplicate charter, issued the same day {ibid. p. 476). ^See Cal. Patent Rolls, 1301-7, p. 191, instruction of 16 May, 1303, to royal officers, appointed to survey and arrange the roads to the new town of Kingston-on-Hull, to inquire where it will most benefit the town and mer- chants for roads to be made, and whether on the king's land or on that of others. MEDI/EVAL TOWN PLANNING 25 from Meaux. There Pole erected a stately mansion which, until their migration to London in the next generation, became the head- quarters of the first great house of merchant princes known to mediaeval England. Pole's son, another William, became first Mayor of Hull in 1 322. The identification of the Pole family with the royal foundation secured the thorough exploitation of the King's favour and the natural advantages of its position. When a century later Ravenser was swallowed up by the sea, Hull stood without a rival among the ports between Newcastle and Lynn. In southern England another famous port was already enduring the fate that was soon to be meted out to Ravenser. This was Winchelsea, or more precisely Old Winchelsea, a town then situated on a low cliff off the East Sussex coast, which had long been crumb- ling into the sea, and over whose site nowadays the German submarine may perchance have torpedoed many a harmless merchant- ship. After vain efforts to prop up the old town,^ Edward encouraged its still prosperous inhabitants to change bodily the site of their borough. He chose for their new home the wooded hill of Iham. This emi- nence rose steeply above the broad estuary then formed by the river Brede so that the site, though raised above all danger of flood, was ac- cessible for sea-going craft and easily defensible. It lay some three miles north-west of Old Winchelsea. As early as 1 280 Edward di- rected his steward to obtain by purchase or exchange land at Iham suitable for the new town.^ In 1 28 1 he nominated Stephen of Pen- chester, Itier of Angouleme and Henry le Waleys to assess certain "places," that is "burgages" or building sites, and to let them for building at a fixed rent to the " barons and good men " of Winchelsea.^ Penchester, more properly called Penshurst,* was warden of the Cinque Ports, and it is significant that the second commissioner, Itier, was a Gascon of wide experience in bastide building, while the third, Henry le Waleys, was a great London merchant with close Gascon connexions, who had been mayor of Bordeaux as well as of London. ^ For instance, Cal. Pat. Rolls, 1272-81, p. 151. ''Ibid. p. 144. ""Ibid. 1281-92. p. 3. * Stephen was called Penchester by contemporaries, but so was the place now called Penshurst in Kent, which gave him his name, where he lived and was buried. It is better therefore to call him by the modern form of the place name. 26 THE JOHN RYLANDS LIBRARY Yet all these efforts remained for two or three years fruitless. It looks as if the king tried to drive too hard a bargain with the men of Old Winchelsea, and that they were too wary to accept his first offers. Anyhow in 1 284 a fuller commission was appointed with greater powers and discretion. In this Penshurst and Waleys were associated with Gregory of Rokesley, the actual mayor of London, to " plan and assess the new town of Iham which the king is order- ing to be built there for the barons of Winchelsea, as that town is al- ready in great part submerged by the sea and is in danger of total submersion ". The commissioners were to " plan and give directions " for the necessary streets and lanes, for places suitable for a market, and for two churches to be dedicated to St. Thomas of Canterbury and St. Giles, the patron saints of the two parishes in the old town. They were also to assign and deliver to the said " barons " of Winchelsea com- petent " places," or building sites, according to their requirements.^ In these minute directions we have the most detailed evidence of con- scious town planning by royal authority that the age was to witness. Note also that the king still kept the site in his own hands. How far Penshurst and the two Londoners discharged their mis- sion is not knowm. But it looks as if the "barons " clung as long as they could to their old abodes, the more so as they may still have been afraid of entrusting themselves to the absolute control of the royal lord of the new borough. However in 1287, when Edward was in Gascony, a mighty inundation threatened to sweep away the water- logged remnants of Old Winchelsea, and after that no more delay was possible. One of Edward's strongest ministers, John Kirkby, Bishop of Ely, the treasurer, was, either now or earlier, assigned to the " ordering " of the new town." But he seems to have thought that the best way of getting the thing done was to let the persons chiefly con- cerned have a preponderating share in the management of the new ven- ture. Accordingly in 1 288 the regency, of which Kirkby was perhaps the leading spirit, handed over Iham hill to the " barons of Winchelsea," save some ten acres reserved for the king's use. On their taking up their abodes in the new town, they were to enjoy the same liberties that they had had before at Old Winchelsea.*^ The effect of this was that the 1 Cal. Patent Rolls, 1281-92, pp. 81-2. - Ibid. 1301-7, p. 185. ^ Cal. Fine Rolls, I. 249 (23 June, 1 288). An earlier cancelled order of 21 June is in Cal. Close Rolls, 1279-88, pp. 509-10. w W MEDI/EVAL TOWN PLANNING 27 washed-out burgesses were to be secure of their old franchises and to participate in the laying out of the town. From this point onwards the greater liberality of the administration and the growing cruelty of the sea combined to accelerate the progress of the new venture. Iham, now New Winchelsea, was duly laid out into thirty-nine chequers or squares after the fashion of Gascony and Gwynedd. But certain deviations from the normal bastide plan, noted by local historians, may perhaps be due to the irregularity of the site and the prejudices of the bur- gesses, though they are more likely the result of the king's wish to lay out the new nest as much like the old one as possible, to tempt the timid fledglings to take up their quarters in it. Power to wall the town was given to the burgesses.^ Along the western and only exposed side a moat was drawn. Strong gates, soon to be supplemented by a wall, barred access to the borough. Magnificent churches, friaries, and public buildings arose under the king's own eye. By 1 297 New Win- chelsea had so far come into being that it could afford accommodation for the embarkation of the great host which Edward led from its harbour to Flanders. As in Hull, Edward made terms with the most active of the local magnates. The house of Alard, who stood to Winchelsea as the Pole family stood to Hull, had already fought in his wars and soon had custody of the town for life. A prosperous future seemed assured, but before very long the sea played almost as cruel a trick on New Winchelsea as it had played on its predecessor. The harbour silted up ; the waters retreated leaving the town high and dry on its hill, and looking towards its neighbour Rye over the marshes that now fill up the site of the harbour where ships had once sciiled and anchored. New Winchelsea, therefore, ceased to be a port and soon also it ceased to be a town. In the magnificent fragment of St. Thomas' Church, with its matchless series of Alard tombs ; in the remaining gates, one standing forlorn in the fields far from human habitation, and above all in the signs of town plots that can still be discerned in land now given over to husbandry — the traveller can still see suggestions of the sometime greatness of the most elaborate scheme of town planning ever devised even by Edward I. There is another town planning scheme of Edward I, which was perhaps never fully realized, but which nevertheless had some permanent importance in history. As a result of Edward's first con- 1 Cal. Patent Rolls, 1292-1301, p. 147 (1295). 28 THE JOHN RYLANDS LIBRARY quest of Scotland in 1 296, Berwick-on-Tweed, up to that date the chief commercial centre of southern Scotland, fell into his hands. The king had prescience enough to foresee future troubles with Scotland, and we may feel sure that the strategic and commercial advantages of the peninsula site of Berwick, on the tongue of land between the Tweed and the sea, made its appeal to the founder of Libourne, Hull, and Winchelsea. Accordingly he resolved to make it an English town and outpost of English influence. This involved the displacement of the Scottish population and the assignment of their homes to English settlers, to attract whom a new constitution for the town was clearly necessary. For all these objects a wise king thought it prudent to take the best advice he could procure. Accordingly, while on his way south back from his recent conquest, Edward issued writs ordering representatives of the chief towns in England to meet him at Bury St. Edmunds, to which place also a general parliament was summoned for 3 November, 1 296. Though many of the towns sent their citizens and burgesses to this assembly, Edward's con- sultative council, though meeting at the same time and place, was constituted by other persons than those sent to represent the same Constituencies in the Parliament. By a writ of privy seal of 21 September, London was ordered to elect " four wise men of the most knowing and most sufficient who know best how to devise, order and array a new town to the most profit of the king and of merchants ". These were to attend at Bury St. Edmunds on the appointed date, and be ready to proceed elsewhere on this business wherever the king may enjoin them to go. We knew exactly how the Londoners carried out the order. There were summoned on 22 October the aldermen and four good men of each ward of the city, and these unanimously selected the four experts in planning new towns who were to help the king in his mysterious and unnamed new venture in town making.^ Yet this was not all, for three days later more normal writs of summons ''^ were issued to twenty-three other cities and boroughs to send to Bury two representatives each, whose ^ The writ and its return are printed in Palgrave, Parliamentary Writs, I. 49 ; and in Muniynenta Gildhallct of instructing the young in th life in their own tongue. VTh ichhad th. comrion c' J. 1910. UC SOUTHERN REGIONAL LIBRARY FACILITY \L1TILBUKEI Pestilence . . . m WUh an V'Of t lop Va'f kno' n to Thi e is oduct' little . as, thi ' 'e su indi 000 739J90 7 [London']"" n485 ?l7 .' .' •hf "aytied and reherced many _ by thi . . . Bisshop of Arusiens. by Guthrie Vine. 1910. 4to, pp. xxxvi, 18. 5s. net. consisting of nine leaves, written by Benedict Kanuti, or Knutsson, separate editions are known, but only one > copy of each, and an odd leaf in any edition of the place of printing, date or name of printer, but they al! inte i one the five pes employed by William de Machlinia, who printed first is nership with 'ohn Lettou and ai erwards alone in the City of London, at the time when William ton was at le most active periu 1 of his career at Westminster. )ODCU' ^ OF "^HE FU iEENTH CENTURY IN THE JOHN RYLANDS LIBRAK i'. ^produced in facsimile. With an introduction and descriptive notes by Campbell Dodgson M.A. Folio. Ten plates, of which two are in colour, and 16 pp. of text, in a portfolio. 7s. 6d. v^t. *,* Two ' ' th V odcuts a. of exceptional interest and importance, and have been known cel<. orated jr a ,itury an . a half, but have not hitherto been reproduced in a satisfactory IP'' "^ ' ' ■ - • ™ 1 .^j^ referred to represent red a great celebrity it the unchallenged f the original Syriac al reprint or trans- lustive introduction seum, the accessory ave appeared since on. Fellow of Clare Shortly. Pp. 140. 20 Illus- illustrations, of the n time to time. net each. GLISH POETS. By William Poel, i IN THE EAST Pp. 32. 7 Illus- Thumb, Dr.Phil., !4. 2 Illustrations. ENTURY. By iblication, which in ent additions to the value and interest. 'IS