. 0. ”.4 v.

”I... “Mum-VOW

u .n
”no“. «Imam-mm.-

u-Iv- n

nu. «nu-w
I

cum»- Amman."

utuownunm-wmu.

.m. «n.-
n .. A.

 

. ...
I.”.-......~.::z

' a.

M

' "7"“. u
. 0 h I...“

m‘ Imus-n

M

« MW
ow... ' ' ‘vw'i-‘c

- I m
mm on m «M.-

I
- mun“ u t.
Im'nw «.n—o .‘

.
~.~.M........;

..
‘fi‘lfivuvl4hki
Mm mun u
l a u w. 0
a...“ I. . .
hum-.1.-. a...-

M»...
H" Wfitl‘MM-

‘o-v-Mcu 0.... u

. I n u- nnmuQ—qm' W -‘
wou- .
W - w

I
«tum... mm“...

luw
“a”......w....*.

ammo-o

u.

mwmmwum- n-«wuulau

.
nuwvm...‘

  

‘gjuLAJI
01“ ran: 7
UNWERQIT'!
a? I»

ARCHITECTURE L13;

     
     
   

      

i

CAT. FOR
ARCHETECTURE

              

. ‘ v ‘ : X
«‘9’ ‘ “.4, ’F __ C‘ 1’;/ f“ ”‘1', 3 r: 39%;,
i, (I If 2‘ aw“,{§gt';«>f ‘. ‘gw é , a:

a 7‘41» if‘ .3 €~M 1; x V -

 
 
 

g} ‘ , .
\vfl h‘fi’lyf- - . \. . E fé V

6

 

THE VISIT OF THE JURORS
IN THE PHEBE A. HEARST
ARCHITECTURAL COMPETITION

UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA

[Reprinted from the UNIVERSITY CHRONICLE, Vol. IIy No. 4, October, 1899]

 

/C (or «P. .

THE VISIT OF THE J URORS IN THE HEARST
ARCHITECTURAL COMPETITION.

 

On the morning of August 30, 1899, the four architects
who, together with Mr. J. B. Reinstein, composed the jury
of the final competition for the Phebe A. Hearst Archi-
tectural Plan arrived at San Francisco. These architects
were M. J. L. Pascal, of Paris, Dr. Paul Wallot, of Dresden,
Mr. John Belcher, of London, and Mr. Walter Cook, of
New York. Mr. R. Norman Shaw had been the English
representative in the preliminary competition, held at
Antwerp, in October, 1898, but on account of his illness
his place had been assigned to Mr. Belcher.

On the afternoon of their arrival they visited Berkeley.
On the campus they were greeted by the student-body, Mr.
Willsie Martin, of the Senior Class, making the speech of
welcome. At the Library an informal reception was
tendered them by the Faculty, in whose behalf Professor
LeConte made a brief address. I11 the evening Mayor
Phelan received the jurors in the rotunda of the New City
Hall, San Francisco.

On the evening of August 31, Mrs. Hearst gave a
banquet to the jurors at the Palace Hotel. Mayor James
D. Phelan presided, and welcomed the jurors in Mrs.
Hearst’s name. M. Pascal responded on behalf of the
jurors. Regent A. S. Hallidie was the next speaker; and
in closing he proposed the health of Mrs. Hearst, to which
Professor William Carey Jones was called upon to respond.
The addresses are printed below.

M74923?

4

The jury commenced their examination of the drawings
for the final competition on the morning of August 31,
and continued their study, with but slight intermission,
until September 7. On Saturday afternoon, September 2,
they visited Mt. Tamalpais, spending the night there, and
011 the next morning they went by special train to Mrs.
Hearst’s home, the Hacienda del Pozo de Verona, near
Pleasanton. On Monday morning they visited Berkeley,
in the company‘of Professor Jones and Mr. Maybeck, and
inspected the grounds.

On the evening of September 7, the Jury having com—
pleted their examination of the plans, and being ready to
make their awards, Mrs. Hearst gave a reception in the
Ferry Building to some two thousand persons.

From Saturday, September 9, to the following Monday,
the jurors were the guests of Mrs. Hearst at Monterey.
On the evening of September 10, M. Pascal was entertained
by the Cercle-Francais, and Dr. Wallot by the German-
Americans of San Francisco. And on September 12, the
San Francisco Chapter of the American Institute of
Architects entertained the jurors at luncheon at the Olifi
House.

On the evening of September 13, the visiting jurors
took their departure.

ADDRESSES AT THE BANQUET TO THE JURORS.

 

MAYOR PHELAN’ S ADDRESS.

Mrs. Hearst and Gentlemen :

On behalf of Mrs. Hearst, I desire to extend a cordial
welcome to her distinguished guests, who grace this board
this evening. We of San Francisco are on the line of the
world’s travel and hence we are constantly entertaining
strangers. This we are always glad to do; but to-day,
however, we are not welcoming strangers, because Art has

Z)

no country. Our guests this evening occupy places high
in their profession, and have simply transferred the field
of their activities upon the invitation of Mrs. Hearst, from
the Eastern States and Europe to San Francisco and
Berkeley. Therefore, we are not engaged in any perfunc-
tory display of hospitality. They come not to receive, but
to give. They are about to bestow a great benefit upon
us. We do not know what impressions of California they
may carry away with them, but in common with other
travelers, they no doubt had their misgivings about our
commonwealth. Californians are apt to exaggerate and
perhaps these gentlemen have had some justification for
incredulity. .

The designer of our State seal represented California as
a Minerva, fully grown and equipped. Now after a lapse
of fifty years, we find that Minerva, the Goddess of Wisdom,
which was given to us in the earlier days of the foundation
of the State, was not the mature goddess she was repre-
sented to be, for lo! we are asking for a plan after our
University has been established for over thirty years. The
founders of the University may have had a plan, but
looking over the ground, it seems now somewhat nebulous.

All plans are subject to criticism, and there are those
who believe that if they had been present at the creation, they
could have made some very valuable suggestions; but in
devising a plan such as would last for all time, it was
reserved for Mrs. Hearst to pay the highest compliment to
the State by saying that it was worthy of the best, and
setting aside our “territorial sectarianism,” so peculiar to
us, she went out into the world for guidance and advice.

California may boast of great material resources, but
we have never claimed that we are in a position to teach in
matters of art, architecture, and music. We still owe
instruction to the great centers of Eastern and European
civilizations. We were all agreed that we should have a
plan before we begin the serious work of the construction
of University buildings and grounds, and the question

6

before us was: “Where should we get the plan and how?”

The master minds of the world of architecture should be}
brought in competition; that was agreed: but the Regents

said that the maintenance of the University absorbed‘all
their funds, and if a proposal of this kind were made, Mr..

Hallidie, Chairman of the Finance Committee of the Board

of Regents, would rise in his place, and regret that money

was not available. If the Legislature were appealed to,

the same objections would be made and hence it was

necessary that private beneficence should be invoked; but

before the friends of the University had decided on or

indeed thought of such an enterprise, Mrs. Hearst made

the suggestion herself and provided the means.

At Antwerp, two years ago, the plans to the number of
105, were submitted to the jurors who are sitting with us
to-night, Messrs. Pascal, Wallot, Belcher, Cook, and
Reinstein. They selected 11 competitors as being worthy
of the final concours, and the plans of these gentlemen
are the ones which will be finally passed upon in San
Francisco.

The tireless energy of that indefatigable champion of
the University, Mr. Reinstein, has contributed in no small
degree to the success of this most note-worthy competition
and Mr. Maybeck, the Professor of Architecture of the
University, has ably seconded him.

As a result of this great competition, gentlemen, Cali-
fornia is introduced to the world and the Berkeley hills
shall be crowned with the noblest structures ever devised
by man for the education of youth. The thanks of the
commonwealth are due to Mrs. Hearst. She desires, and
I am honored at. the opportunity of proposing the health,
happiness, and success of Messrs. Pascal, Wallot, Cook,
Belcher, and Reinstein; and call upon President Pascal, on
behalf of his colleagues, to respond.

MONSIEUR PASCAL’S ADDRESS.

In the year 1849, when I was a child, in Paris, I
remember seeing a party of adventurous Frenchmen march-
ing along with music, to take the boat for Rouen and
Havre, and thence to California, that unknown country of
the New World. How far I was then from imagining that
one day I should have to address you here in San Francisco,
in the name of a jury, largely composed of Europeans, on
the subjects which interest you all in the highest degree; on
education, on literature, on science, above all on art,—
that sign of the highest civilization of a people. That I am
called upon to do so is perhaps as much the privilege of age,
as it is an honor paid to my native country and its arts.

You have not been contented that your growing Uni-
versity should only be provided with the most perfect
means of study, that its professors should be the best in
each branch of learning, that its organization should be
adapted equally to its present resources and its ultimate
development; that its scientific equipment should be ample
for the present and the future. You have demanded even
more—a still higher thought, a still more noble conception
has made you feel that the home of learning here must
be a great one and a beautiful one, laid out on a plan
at once logical and monumental, fitted for your present
ambition and your future greatness. You have wished
that your buildings, too, should be a part of the education
of your sons, unconsciously giving them that feeling for
the beautiful that comes from harmonious and just propor-
tion; and that they should constitute a monument of art
worthy of your State.

And if to some of you the influence of what you hope
to obtain seems fugitive and as though it might leave few
traces behind it, be sure that before long you will see that
order, arrangement, and noble proportions, beauty of form
and material; and a fine sympathy between nature and

8

architecture will not be without their efiect on the young
minds of your students.

It is to to this end, that we, whose ancestors paved the
way for your civilization of to-day, have come with our
colleague from New York, to aid you in your choice.
Eleven architects, of incontestable talent, have taken part
in this second competition, having been chosen from about
a hundred. One of these you will choose, and it is to his
initial conception that the future University will owe its
form—each succeeding generation contributing its part.
So, among all the vicissitudes and the revolutions of my
troubled country, our Republic is still working to complete
the Versailles of Louis XIV.

For the execution of this noble plan, the generosity of
a great-hearted and intelligent woman has furnished the
resources. It is she who has made this International
Competition, the greatest of modern times, a possibility.
It is she who has so ordered our long journey to the
Pacific, that our memories of it are only those of kindness
and of attention to all our wishes before they were expressed;
so that it will be for all of us one of the most interesting
in our lives as artists. We heartily thank her for all this;
and to express the heartiest hopes for the realization of all
her wishes, knowing that she has none dearer than the
success of this work, we wish to include in the same toast
the University of California and Mrs. Phebe Hearst.

I

REGENT HALLIDIE’S ADDRESS.
Mr. Chairman:

California was not of age when the State University
was organized, and a generation has not passed since that
event. The schoolmaster who first called his class together
in San Francisco is still living. The son of California
who presides at this table, the honored Mayor of this city,
made his advent after California had become a State, and
he took up the activities of life after the birth of the

9

University. His welcome to the distinguished gentlemen
who honor us with their presence shows his appreciation of
the State that gave him birth, and his identification with
that progress in affairs that helps to make a state, build a
city, and give dignity to its surroundings.

We have grown up in a hap-hazard sort of a way, but
Providence has been kind to us, and we have often builded
better than we knew. The deliberation of older communities
is not with us, nor has their forethought been with us; and
when we have wanted a thing we have wanted it badly, and
we have scarcely had time to breathe until we got it.
Progress is everywhere here strongly in evidence, but it
has been of a heterogeneous nature, and often we have had
to advance backwards in order to make enduring progress.

Our friends, the guests of to—night, who have come
from Dresden and London and Paris and New York, will
probably look with more amazement than admiration on
the varied tastes in evidence all around them, and I fear
they will be inclined to give more credit to nature than to
art for that which is beautiful.

Nature sometimes veils herself, and yesterday at Berkeley
she refused to throw open to them the full beauty of the
landscape spread out in front of them, reserving that for a
postponed pleasure.

The University of California—that State so endeared to
us by our many early trials, so beloved by us through its
bounty and its beauty, its sunshine and its gladness—and
that University, the child of our heart, to labor for which
has been our joy, and whose manly growth has filled our
eyes with tears of happiness and satisfaction.

Who is there in this room that has not felt a pleasure
in its childhood, and a satisfaction in its adolescence“.l
The other day I addressed the freshman class, 530 as bright
and refined young men and women as you can find in any
part of the world. The growth of the noble institution
has been marvelous. Ten years ago, in Berkeley, it had
306 students, and 60 names on its salary roll of $95,000.

10

To-day it has 1,700 students, and 189 on its salary roll of
$260,000 per annum. '

The general government and the State have been liberal
in their contributions. Our annual income exceeds $400,000,
but, large as it is, it does not supply sufficient fuel to keep
the fires of the University life going. Friends have come
forward and chairs have been created by private means,
that of philosophy being established none too early perhaps
to leaven the Board of Regents, of which body I have the
honor of being a member.

Under the pressure of circumstances we have attempted
to house the faculty and the students; but the faculty
of being students of the beautiful in architecture and its
possibilities for the future, does not appear to have been a
well-developed success. We have a magnificent building
site, but the sight of the buildings is not magnificent, and
the building of the State has claimed more attention than I
the state of the buildings. But, in spite of all this, the
University, as an institution, has grown, and has com-
manded from year to year the increasing respect of the
educational world, and although situate on the westernmost
limit of the American continent, separated from the rest of
national life by two great mountain chains and vast spaces
of desert land, it has kept in touch with the progressive
spirit of the age, and done its share in original investigation.

With a faculty of earnest, thoughtful men, devoting the
best in them to the work before them, having full faith in
the future, and active in their pursuits of the present, Why
should we not have an institution of learning that is a
credit to the State, an honor to the Nation? Free, abso-
lutely free,—open alike to men and women—what restriction '
is there in the admission to its portals of the best minds
among the youths of the country, and Where is the barrier
that can deny entrance to the young men and women
however poor in worldly possession? To such the State of
California extends a hearty welcome. But yet, free as it is,
you know and I know that some of the best and brightest

11

need encouragement and help to enable them to drink from
this fountain of knowledge.

For many years a few of the wealthy and thoughtful
men of the State had been making donations to its different
departments, many of these of great value, and perhaps of
greater value than was realized at the time because they
inspired others to give. One day, nearly eight years ago,
there came into my hands a letter to be presented to the
Board of Regents, which reads, in part, as follows:

"It is my intention to contribute annually to the funds
of the University of California the sum of $1,500, to be
used for five $300 scholarships for worthy young women.

“Two of the scholarships are to be given this year, and
the remaining three at the beginning of the August term
next year. I bind myself to pay this sum during my life,
and I have prm'ided for a perpetual fund after my death.

“The qualifications entitling students to the scholarship
shall be noble character and high aims, it being understood
that without the assistance here given a University course
would in each case be impossible.

“PHEBE A. HEARs'r.”

Almost immediately thereafter Mrs. Hearst increased
the number from five to eight. That letter, the spirit and
sentiment of the gift, for the first time brought the Uni-
versity strictly before the people, and made them realize
that it deserved to be cherished and nourished.

The Great Architect, when he created California, built
it on a plan of architectural and engineering beauty.
Within the great range of mountains—the Sierra Nevadas
—which raise their heads far upwards in the realm of the
Great Designer and form the eastern boundary of the State,
and the range of hills which parallel the sea-shore, are the
two great rivers, one coming down from the north, the
other running up from the south, meeting, and pouring
jointly their fresh waters through a series of bays into the
great Bay of San Francisco, Where they join the free waters
of the ocean and find their exit to the broad Pacific Ocean

12

through the Golden Gate. Berkeley, situate on the hills
overlooking all this, receives its inspiration from the broad
Pacific and the last smile of the setting sun as it kisses
the parting day and sinks in the western horizon. Is it
surprising, then, that the cry of the University is, “Let
there be light!” and that the answer comes from the
glorious orb after it has absorbed all that modern civiliza‘
tion can contribute on its passage through Europe and
across the broad continent of America?

What is the University doing to warrant these extraor-
dinary efforts to insure her future glory and influence for
good, and to justify the presence of these distinguished
architects, the guests of the evening, who have come so far
from the various centres of art and civilization to pass
verdict on plans that shall insure harmony and homogeneity
in the buildings of the future, and who have come at the
invitation of that embodiment of the womanhood of this
State, the noble and distinguished hostess of this occasion?

Let us see. It is carrying out the wishes of the Nation
in maintaining "at least one college where the leading
object shall be, without excluding other scientific and
classical studies and including military tactics, to teach
such branches of learning as are related to agriculture and
the mechanic arts.” It is carrying into efiect the agree-
ment it made with the College of California “to found
and maintain a University which shall include a College
of Mines, a College of Civil Engineering, a College of
Mechanics, a College of Agriculture, an Academic College.”
It is keeping faith with the State in maintaining, through
afiiliation or otherwise, a College of Law, a College of
Medicine, at College each of Pharmacy, Dentistry, and
Veterinary Science. By means of four agricultural stations,
located at diiferent parts of the State, it is making experi-
ments and obtaining economical results through the eiforts
of a staif of efficient workers in each station. In Forestry,
it has two stations where similar work is being performed.
At Mount Hamilton it is maintaining an efiicient and

l3

admirably—equipped astronomical observatory, with the
largest—but one—telescope in the world, and under the
direction of a most distinguished astronomer and devoted
corps of observers. In San Francisco, near the Potrero,
there is being constructed under the direction of the
Regents, a trade school that will by its teachings annually
make 150 boys independent in future life; and looking to
the future greatness and possibilities of the University, the
governing board has quite recently elected for its President
a man distinguished in the world of letters and the field of
education, Professor Benjamin Ide Wheeler, of. Cornell,
whose absence from this board to-night is a source of
regret to all.

Outside the college work in Berkeley and in San Fran-
cisco, few have any idea of the extent of the work being
done by the University throughout the State: a State that
contains about 155,000 square miles, or 100,000,000 acres,
with climatic conditions which vary, necessarily, within the
boundaries of ten degrees of latitude and 6,000 feet of
altitude, and under the influence of the inland winds and
the ocean breeze, and whose natural products embrace
almost everything that can be produced from the soil or.
developed from the depths of the earth.

The work which is being done by the State of California,
through the Board of Regents, for the people, it is believed
is being as well done as could be done under the circum-
stances. It is not the work of to-day for to-day, but it is
the work of each day by day for the future. Who can tell
what relation the State of California will bear to the great
Empires t0 the west of us across the sea, or to the islands
of the Pacific, fifty years hence“.l And beyond:

“There shall be sung another golden age,
The rise of empire and of arts,

The good and great inspiring epic rage, -
The wisest heads and noblest hearts.
Not such as Europe breeds in her decay,

Such as she bred when fresh and young,

14

When heavenly flames did animate her clay,
By future poets shall be sung.

Westward the course of empire takes its way,
The four first acts already past,

A fifth shall close the drama with the day;—
Time’s noblest ofispring is the last.”

Thus sang Bishop Berkeley one hundred and seventy-
three years ago.

The theme which inspired Berkeley in 1726, has inspired
in these days a noble woman. Do you doubt my earnest-
ness and sincerity in pledging, standing, with the loving-
cup, the health of Phebe A. Hearst?

PROFESSOR JONES’ ADDRESS.

An intense, devoted, and vital pride in the State of: Cali-
fornia; a mind and heart cultivated and enlarged by long
and sympathetic relations with philanthropic and educa-
tional aspirations; an unusual experience in the life and
business of the world; an artistic intuition cultivated t0
the point of knowledge and appreciation; a loyal devotion to
.the memory of her husband, and a desire and determination
to perpetuate his name, in the most worthy and honorable
manner, in the land he loved so well and served so honestly,
so generously, and so faithfully;—these, as I conceive,
have been the more special propelling influences which
have led to the great, the splendid, results which are to be
disclosed to us.

" v " As I review in my mind the history of this enterprise, I
think I see several tendencies combining and cooperating.
The first of these is a general tendency, born of our
surroundings and the spirit of the place. It flows from
our life in California. Nature, formed upon a large,
generous, and beautiful plan, molds man to ampler propor-
tions. While there may be the common strain of that
which is narrow, petty, and temporizing, yet there is a
sentiment which in the long run rules, and allows not the

15

permanent domination of the mean, sordid, and inharmoni-
ous. Nature here, and man enlarged by the beauties and
nobilities of nature that surround him, demand that human
creations shall accord with the physical environment. This
is the matrix; California and the Californian spirit is the
matrix, out of which was born the Phebe A. Hearst archi-
tectural plan.

Out of this large and general tendency several special
tendencies, running their course, combined to the produc-
tion of this project. The first of these was manifested in
the working of the mind of our gifted Maybeck. He it
was who conceived that the University structures cumbering
the site at Berkeley might be obliterated and a noble and
harmonious group take their place. Here was the dream.

The second tendency came forth out of a son of California,
a son of the University, the broad-visioned Reinstein. He
undertook the preparation of the field, the sowing and the
cultivating. With infinite pains he gathered opinions,
ideas, criticisms, and data. He formulated a practicable
scheme. Here was the shaped and molded idea.

Now, there was a third tendency pursuing its course
through many years, that at the right time showed itself
matured in the large and generous acts of Mrs. Hearst.
For long her mind and life had been developing themselves
for the execution of some great and noble service to Cali—
fornia. It was no mere chance that led Mrs. Hearst to the
adoption of the scheme for the housing of the University
with beautiful architectural forms. Nor were the phases in
this scheme, which I have spoken of as particular tendencies,
properly speaking mere successive steps. It was out of a
long self-development, partly unconscious and partly of a
predetermined purpose, that came the concentration of her
thoughts and endeavors to the accomplishment of this
object. Her spontaneous proffer to assume the obligation
and responsibility was the beginning of an achieved result.
Here was the life of the idea. 7

The progress of the Phebe A. Hearst architectural plan

16

can be briefly recapitulated. Mrs. Hearst appointed a
board of three trustees. It was determined to have an
international competition, with an invitation to the archi-
tects of all countries to enter. A prospectus announcing
the enterprise was published. A programme outlining the
terms of the international competition, and giving a general
and detailed account of the work to be done, was issued on
December 8, 1897.

In this work the trustees had as special advisers and
coadjutors, Pascal and Guadet in Paris, Carrere in New
York, and Pissis in San Francisco. It is no disparagement
to the many others who cooperated with us to single out
and mention these invaluable aids. The architectural
societies of America and Europe, the press, both professional
and general, the American embassadors, ministers, and
consuls everywhere, lent their aid in promoting the enter-
prise and disseminating information.

An international jury was appointed, composed of the
most eminent exemplars of their art—M. Pascal, Dr.
VVallot, Mr. Shaw, and Mr. Cook. To these was added a
lay member, a representative of the University and of the
trustees, Mr. Reinstein. They met at Antwerp in October,
1898. There they found one hundred and five plans await-
ing their inspection.

That meeting at Antwerp was memorable for the pur-
poses for which it was held, for the eminence of the judges
who passed upon the plans, for the number of architects
who had sent in designs, for the striking character of the
designs themselves, and for the enthusiasm with which the
officials of Antwerp prepared and cared for the competition,
and the splendor with which they received and entertained
Mrs. Hearst and the judges. The magnificent Burgo-
meister, successor of the long line of civic chiefs of that
city, offered in person the hospitality of the community.

The result of the deliberations of the jury was the selec-
tion, out of the one hundred and five plans submitted, of
eleven as possessing preeminent marks of superiority. They

17

were a unanimous choice. Then came the visits of the
authors of these eleven plans to California, their study of
the problem on the ground, and the preparation for the
final competition.

And we are brought new face to face with this final
competition. The drawings submitted by the eleven archi-
tects entitled to enter are arranged in the nave of the
Ferry Building for the examination of the jury. And here,
to-night, we greet and welcome these gentlemen, M. Pascal,
Dr. Wallot, Mr. Belcher, who takes the place of Mr. Shaw,
and Mr. Cook. Their visit here is a notable tribute to the
art which they represent, and a notable tribute to our
enterprise as being a worthy endeavor to advance the art of
architecture. Although, through the munificent thought-
fulness of Mrs. Hearst, their journey to San Francisco has
been as comfortable and luxurious as modern travel may be
made, we must not forget that they are men devoted to
their profession and busily engaged therein, and that they
have left their ateliers and business and homes to render us
this great service.

And now, Mr. Mayor, we Wish to add to the felicita-
tions of this evening, which is graced by the presence of
our hostess, of the distinguished architects who are the
special guests, and of this large company who have come
to do them and our hostess honor, to congratulate ourselves
and the whole community that San Francisco can give us
for presiding officer a Mayor, who, by his culture, his public
spirit, and the wise and unremitting observance of his civic
duties, attests the fame and dignity of our city. As at
Antwerp, so in San Francisco, our guests find an honorable
and worthy Burgomeister to extend to them the freedom of
the city favored by their presence.

Gentlemen, I ask you to rise again and drink to this

sentiment:
“A lady with a lamp shall stand
In the whole history of the land,
A noble type of good
And perfect womanhood.”

“Mira?“ ‘

 

 

 

 

:0;Luamo~mn~um
ammo-unnam—
.f......... t -- wan-nu

I
I o M~ lwfi‘M-Itm. m». ,

I
mafia-ulna...” n umvm
mob-«0.1

Mm

- v mm "sum-Wt...»

 

n . .w.
c»...mn‘umumvw
u M». .m-

Numm-v...:.~~.- . mac-n .m
.m..- .9... --o-~ ugh-3.... n,
on, o.- val».
v' :nm‘——-- - nan-nn-o-In‘oamamal
m-Wt— nun-n- -'~O.M ‘-
m.-

amfium mu:

5:: mwanamc
0,...

gm. «-
nun.»- In». at 0....—

m— nun u.-.~..4..,-.m..... -, u-

“filo--
.4. >.. M...»-
---—.-u»-.o.c.u,-u,m . . .4” w:

mm mam...
..v...u.:.........‘..mm.. lama-am“
.-

A... .4
m A v».- Ia,-

~...c.~-...... .-
w-Oql "Own nun-.- I - o 1.. . man ...
nuns-mu... n“ 5"". n

W
n»..- I owi._p.u~ ”-

.4.»

a...»
..::.~«.p-uq
«ham- -m

"vamImMy-«mo

m m u... .
mma1mU-0l
u»
mouth». M»..-
Waumm.~.~~n.mm
:D.".I-—UV—IO.I .14....
|
m nun-.mm-n
l
u...»- syn-tom“:-
M

*4
mm “manna-'20.- cal

 

flux... ”.04.... "a;
‘4‘ .._.