WBUC HEALTH 16 °rl^ O.b. depository INDEX S€pi^!979 U.S. DEPOSITORY M - SIKBSISILfflSI® sep i (•1979 Utfealth Planning Bibliography A Review of Planning Methods and Criteria for Neonatal Intensive Care Units: An Annotated Bibliography of the Clinical and Health Planning Literature Series UHEALTH PLANNING SERIES The Bureau of Health Planning is a primary resource for current information on a wide variety of topics related to health planning. To facilitate the dissemination of this information to health planners, the Bureau issues publications in the following series: Health Planning Methods and Technology This series focuses on the technical and administrative aspects of health planning. Included are such areas as methods and approaches to the various aspects of the health planning process, techniques for analyzing health planning information and problems, and approaches to the effective dissemination and utilization of technical information. Health Planning Information This series presents information on the analysis of issues and problems relating to health planning including trend data, data analysis, and sources of data to support health planning activities. Health Planning Bibliography Bibliographies on specific health planning subjects are published in this series. Subject areas are selected by the frequency of inquiries on specific topics and from suggestions by Bureau staff and health planners throughout the Nation. "A Review of Planning Methods and Criteria for Neonatal Intensive Care Units: An Annotated Bibliography of the Clinical and Health Planning Literature" is the fifteenth publication in the Health Planning Bibliography Series. A list of all publications in the Health Planning Bibliography Series appears on the inside of the back cover of this publication. Documents can be ordered from the National Technical Information Service (NTIS), 5285 Port Royal Road, Springfield, Virginia 22161.A Review of Planning Methods and Criteria for Neonatal Intensive Care Units: An Annotated Bibliography of the Clinical and Health Planning Literature Prepared under Contract No. HRA 231-77-0108 by Boston University Center for Health Planning Boston, Massachusetts August 1979 HRP-0301601 L U S DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH. EDUCATION. AND WELFARE Public Health Service Health Resources Administration Bureau of Health Planning National Health Planning Information Center . DHEW Publication No. (HRA) 79-14038 5t>344-‘-fz.!2_ PUBLIC HEALTH LIBRARYFOREWORD The major purpose of this annotated bibliography is to assist State and local agencies in the planning and review of neonatal intensive care units. It covers the important background and more recent clinical and health planning literature as well as the National Guidelines for Health Planning. A subject index which identifies areas of frequent interest for planners has been included to assist the reader in the use of this material. Neonatal intensive care units are a widely accepted although relatively new institutional resource for the optimal manage- ment of high-risk newborn infants. These special care units require highly trained personnel, specialized equipment, and support services which are not available or appropriate for all insti- tutions. It is, therefore, especially important to determine the number and types of patients, appropriate setting, and geographic location for each unit in an area to ensure appropriate utilization and provide the most effective services both in terms of patient care and costs. The material for this bibliography was prepared for the Health Resources Administration as part of the work under Contract No. 231-77-0108, A Review of Planning Methods and Criteria for Neonatal Intensive Care Units. Colin C. Rorrie, Jr., Ph.D Director Bureau of Health Planning iiiOnifDOTEOS This report was prepared by the Boston University Center for Health Planning. The Project Director was Charles L. Donahue, Jr. The principal staff members responsible for writing this document were Marc Wine and Saul Spivack. Other staff members involved in this project were Rosemary Chiusano, Cynthia Brown and Paula Dolan. The Boston University Center for Health Planning would like to thank the Health Resources Administration Project Director, Alan L. Pinkerson, M.D., for his advice and support throughout the project. The Center would also like to thank the following individuals for their review and comments on the draft report: Leo Stern, M.D., Chairman of Pediatrics, Brown University and Pediatrician-in-Chief at Rhode Island Hospital; Mary Terrell, Office of State Health Planning, Massachusetts Department of Public Health; Mark Chambers, Southeastern Wisconsin Health Systems Agency, Inc., John Suskiskis, New Jersey Department of Health; Charles Kratt, Central Jersey Health Planning Council, Inc.; Donald S. Shepard, Ph.D., Adjunct Research Associate, Kennedy School of Government and Lecturer in Health Services, Harvard School of Public Health; Joe Liberatore, Health Systems Agency of San Diego and Imperial Counties; Andrew Fleck, M.D., M.P.H., New York State Department of Health. ivPREFACE One of the Section 1502 priorities of Public Law 93-641 calls for the 'development by health service institutions of the capacity to provide various levels of care (including intensive care, acute general care and extended care) on a geographically integrated basis." Perinatal health services have been chosen for special attention in the development of these regional health systems. Standards respecting the appropriate supply, distribution, and organization of health resources have been developed for obstetric and neonatal intensive care services. These standards are required by Section 1501 of the National Health Planning and Resources Development Act as a part of the National Guidelines for Health Planning. Health Systems Plans established after December 31, 1978, must be consistent with these resource standards. The standards for neonatal intensive care require that the services be planned on a regional basis for linkages with obstetric services. The population-based need should not exceed four intensive and intermediate level beds per 1,000 live births per year for a defined neonatal service area. An adjustment of this rate upward is justified when the rate of high risk pregnancies in an area is unusually high. A single Level II or Level III neonatal intensive care unit should contain a minimum of 15 beds. An adjustment of this standard downward may be justified for a Level II or Level III unit when geographic remoteness makes travel time to an alternate unit a serious hardship. These resource standards are largely based on the report "Towards Improving the Outcome of Pregnancy." This report was issued by the Committee on Perinatal Health, representing the American Academy of Pediatrics, the American Academy of Family Physicians, the American Academy of Obstetrics and Gynecology, the American Medical Associ- ation, and the National Foundation-March of Dimes. Health planning agencies could benefit from technical assistance materials as they try to implement the changes called for by the Standards of the National Guidelines for Health Planning. Health planning agencies need assist- ance in some of the following areas: « in understanding the clinical and health planning background literature o in understanding how neonatal intensive care units relate to a perinatal regional system o in understanding the use of and adjustments to the Standards of the National Guidelines for Health Planning v• in understanding the methods and techniques for planning of neonatal intensive care units • in organizing the planning process for the formal designation of hospital units in terms of level of care and service areas • in educating those involved in the planning process and those who will be affected by it This Volume, An Annotated Bibliography of the Clinical and Health Planning Literature, should assist health planning agencies in their literature reviews. An effort was made to abstract information that would be of assist- ance to health planning agencies. The focus of the review was on literature relating to the planning of neonatal intensive care units. It is not a review of the perinatal planning literature. The clinical articles were abstracted from books and journals. The health planning documents were largely unpublished. Each health planning agency in the United States was contacted and asked to submit reports or other documents that it had developed related to the planning of neonatal intensive care units. These documents were the basis of the health planning reviews. The documents are separated into two groups. The clinical literature is first and is followed by the planning literature. The documents in each section are organized alphabetically according to the name of the lead author. A listing of all articles is in the bibliography. The index is organized by subject. viCONTENTS Foreword iii Acknowledgments iv Preface v Chapter 1. Clinical Literature 1 Chapter 2. Health Planning Literature 116 Bibliography of Clinical Literature 181 Bibliography of Health Planning Literature 188 Index 191 vii CHAPTER 1 CLINICAL LITERATURE Alden, Errol R., M.D., Ted Mandelkorn, M.D., David E. Woodrum, M.D., Richard P. Wennberg, M.D., Colby R. Parks, M.D., and W. Alan Hodson, M.D. 1976 "Morbidity and Mortality of Infants Weighing less than 1,000 grains in an Intensive Care Nursery". From the Division of Neonatal Biology, Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington. GENERAL ABSTRACT: A five-year experience with 161 infants with birth weights less than 1,000 grams was evaluated to ascertain predictive factors for mortality, cause of morbidity, and status of survivors. There was an overall mortality of 87% which was worse if the initial hemocrit was less than 40%, the blood pressure was less than 40 cm H20, the Apgar score was low, or if hyaline membrane disease was present or assisted ventilation was required. The survival rate was improved by two-to threefold if the Apgar score was greater than six and if the infant required no resuscitation. The survival rate was two to three times normal if rupture of the amniotic membranes preceded labor and if the infant was able to maintain his core temperature. Respiratory difficulties accounted for the highest incidence of morbidity: apnea 84%, hyaline membrane disease 66%. Only two infants of the twenty surviving had definite abnormal developmental quotients. Intensive care does not appear to have affected survival but may be responsible for an improved outlook for survivors. ANNOTATIONS: Hyaline membrane disease, apnea, respiratory failure, and infection are the most common causes of morbidity in this weight group. Sixty-six percent of all infants had hyaline membrane disease and only 5% survived. The occur- rence of apnea had no predictive value for survival but was the most common problem (84% of all infants). There was an association between the time of onset of apnea and mortality. Apnea occurred in the first day of life for nonsurvivors but in the third day of life for those who lived. There were no survivors among those infants who required positive pressure ventilation because of hyaline membrane disease. However, infants ventilated because of late occurring apnea (greater than 24 hours) did occasionally survive. Twenty- three percent of the survivors received positive pressure ventilation because of apnea. These infants were ventilated at a much later age (234 hours) than those who died (38 hours). American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists 1978 Health Care for Mothers and Infants in Rural and Isolated Areas. Chicago, IL: American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. GENERAL ABSTRACT: This committee was to organize expanded work groups and produce a document which could help health professionals, State agencies, legislative bodies, and 1consumers improve the quality and availability of health care services in rural and isolated areas. The work was to be based on the premise that mothers and infants in rural and isolated areas should have the same opportu- nities for care as those in more centralized and regionalized urban areas. Areas studied by the committee were Appalachia and rural south, the Rocky Mountains, the Great Plains, and Western Indians. The Western Indian topic was limited to Indians in the northern great plains and the upper southwest part of the United States. The problems of the upper northeast, the Pacific northwest, and other isolated areas were felt to be similar enough to the four designated study areas to allow easy adaptability. Hence, this paper summarizes the activities of this group and presents the model designed to link the rural and isolated population of the United States with the peri- natal health system. ANNOTATIONS: These annotations are meant to be a guide to the specific contents of the paper. These are only general statements concerning planning standards and more specific area-facility recommendations are within the body of the report. General Principles In designing the perinatal care system for rural and isolated areas, the following were identified as guiding principles: • Perinatal health care systems should be designed around the culture and resource strengths of the area. The area should be assessed to determine cultural background of the people and health care resources available before any system can be formulated. • Once the strengths have been outlined, the system should build upon them and eliminate severe deficiencies. It will interface with the population's present system of values. • Rural perinatal health care systems should be built around a model that can be expected to provide total health care. • Some agency or organization should provide manpower, materials and methods to insure a proper foundation for a successful functioning system. • Providers within the health care system should be given responsi- bility in relationship to the training they have received. • The financing of the system should be shared by the population at large. A larger proportion of costs should be shared by the total population as the care increases in complexity. 2Data System The multiple data sources mandate that support for the information system be widespread. The administrators of the perinatal program and the evaluation team ultimately are responsible for the design and implementation of an effective information system. The system should be capable of telling the range of providers, higher level administrators, legislative bodies, and other funding sources, and the public whether the program is attaining its intended objectives. Examples of Indicators: sociodemographic characteris- tics; reduction in percent of women with unfavorable course during pregnancy; reduction in neonatal morbidity; compliance with objectives; long-term reduc- tion in perinatal mortality and morbidity. Vital statistics registration and reporting system include fetal and neonatal death records and birth records. The specific role of the primary perinatal care provider is to: • Supervise/coordinate with health advocates who are linked with the patients for whom responsibility exists. • Provide service needs- • In cooperation with the health advocate, determine if educa- tional needs are met. • Participate in evaluation. Support needed by the primary perinatal care system is: • Education in working with health advocates. • Automated methods of screening, monitoring, communication, and decision making to provide the best perinatal informa- tion to the patient. • A mobile unit or neighborhood clinic which is easily accessible to the patient. Insurance Insurance coverage for perinatal care has often been inadequate, especially in meeting the costs of transport and care of high-risk patients. Insurance companies should be required to offer comprehensive coverage for the perinatal care consumer. Coordination and Consolidation Facilities Protocols to merge or close small inefficient hospital obstetrical units may be inconsistent with rural needs, particularly in view of great distances and difficult weather. Quality professional care and convenient, attractive facilities at low costs are important. Centralization of delivery services in sparsely populated areas may prove counter-productive. 3There is a lack of coordination and sometimes duplication of services in existing facilities. Satellite facilities should be established and linked to existing facilities to help improve the quality and accessibility of care. Consolidation of laboratory facilities across regional and State lines for mass screening and technically difficult procedures may provide better service. Families are often uprooted from their homes and support systems. Need of these persons include emotional support, financing, child care assistance, temporary housing, and tertiary level health care. Housing facilities are needed near the delivery center and/or tertiary care center. Laboratory Support Capability At Level I hospitals, a portable x-ray capability within the nursery is considered ideal, but not mandatory. Semi-microlaboratory techniques should be available for blood glucose, hematocrit, electrolytes, calcium and bilirubin. Ultrasound capability is not essential at the Level I hospital, but must be available at Level II and III centers. Personnel Recommendations in regard to Level I unit personnel include: • To make consultation readily available and to maintain coverage of the obstetrical services, there should be at least two ob- stetricians and up to five nurse midwives or physicians with obstetrical training and experience. • To maintain anesthesia coverage, there should be a minimum of two anesthesiologists or nurse anesthetists. • There should be the capability of performing delivery by Cesarean section within at least 30 to 60 minutes when the need occurs. • Every Level I unit should have a registered nurse on duty at all times whose primary responsibility is the organization and super- vision of nursing services in the labor/delivery area, the new- born nursery and postpartum units. The nurse should possess the knowledge and clinical competency in the nursing care of mother, fetus, and infant during labor and delivery and in the postpartum and neonatal periods. • Facilities with less than 500 deliveries a year should have a staff of at least one professional nurse per shift in the ob- stetrical newborn unit. Where there are over 500 deliveries per year, there is a need for at least two professional nurses per shift for attendance during delivery and the immediate recovery period. Minimal standards of proficiency for health care personnel and providers should be maintained. This must be a priority matter, superceding any political issues. Accreditation and registration standards, plus continuing education standards, must be applied, specifically, Joint Commission on Accreditation of Hospitals' standards. 4American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists 1973 Memorandum to the Committee on Health Care Delivery from Ervin E. Nichols, M.D., FACOG, Associate Director; Maternity and Neonatal Services and Facilities Guidelines for Levels of Complexities of Care. Chicago, IL: American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. GENERAL ABSTRACT: The purpose of this document is to offer broad categories, or levels of complexity of care and guidelines as to the types of patients to be cared for and the services and facilities required at each level. The levels of care are Level I, II, and III for maternity and newborn care. ANNOTATIONS: Facility Requirements for Neonatal Intensive Care: • Facilities for immediate resuscitation for the newborn to include short-term assisted ventilation, cardiac massage and infusion of alkali. This should ideally occur in the delivery room. Minimum requirements are about 40 sq. ft. of space in the delivery room. Resuscitation equipment should include laryngoscopes, endotracheal tubes, resuscitation table with radiant heating and infusion equip- ment. • Short-term assisted respiratory capability should be available to enable stabilization of the infant and preparation for transfer when indicated. • Intravenous therapy with infusion pumps. • Assisted ventilation on short-term basis with bag and mask. • Treatment of infections, except those concerning and affecting the central nervous system. • Exchange transfusion team. • Twenty-four hour clinical laboratory facilities to include micro- blood gases, bilirubin and blood sugars. • Twenty-four hour radiology services for the newborn. • Ultraviolet light therapy for hyperbilirubinemia. 5American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists 1971 National Needs in Obstetrics and Gynecology. Chicago, IL: American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. GENERAL ABSTRACT: This paper summarizes the major national problems in obstetrics and gynecology. Also, it suggests some viable approaches to solutions. The statements herein may be useful as a general guide for introducing and identifying problem areas for planning. ANNOTATIONS: The ACOG has adopted these recommendations for OB/GYN care in hospitals: • The need for hospital obstetric services should be identified by geographic areas and related to population density. • Hospital obstetric services should be consolidated. In larger communities (100,000 population or more) more than 1500 deliveries should occur yearly in each unit. In smaller communities (30,000 population or more) more than 500 deliveries should occur annually in each unit. In rural areas, obstetric services should be coordi- nated and consolidated as much as possible. • Provision should be made for the transfer of patients with major complications from the smaller to the larger units where facili- ties for special care are available. • Regional units for high-risk OB patients and newborns should be developed and evaluated. The following recommendations are offered for financing expensive OB/GYN services: • OB/GYN services should be provided for medically indigent women by insurance payments made on their behalf and realistically calculated. • Differential reimbursement should be established by third-party carriers for normal and high-risk OB/GYN patients. Peer review should be part of the continuing evaluation of such reimbursement. • Reimbursement should be made on a realistic basis according to the relative value of the services provided. • Catastrophic insurance for OB/GYN, such as high-risk patients, should be developed. • Reimbursement by third-party carriers for comprehensive OB/GYN care should include remuneration of services performed by allied health personnel for normal patients and for education, with well-defined standards and under medical supervision. 6• Reimbursement by third-party carriers should be encouraged on a continuing basis for health maintenance under the team approach, both in the private and public sectors, depending upon the personnel necessary and utilized. • Traditional methods of payment for services by fees should be maintained but study and evaluation of new systems should be continued. Berger, Gary S., M.D., Dennis B. Gillings, Ph.D., and Earl Siegel, M.D. 1976 "The Evaluation of Regionalized Perinatal Health Care Programs". American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 125: 924-932. GENERAL ABSTRACT: A survey, conducted in the summer of 1974, to determine the extent of regionalization in perinatal services in the United States revealed 28 states to have programs in operation. About 16 other States had plans to regionalize services. Evaluation was a common concern of these programs. A model for the evaluation of Regionalized Perinatal Care Programs is presented in this article. The North Carolina program is used as an example. Evaluation was mandated as an integral part of the program in North Carolina, and this model has been developed in response to that mandate. ANNOTATIONS: The report of the Perinatal Mortality Committee of the Province of Quebec is of particular importance for evaluation studies because of the adequacy of controls in the analysis. Among infants born in 1967 through 1969 in hospi- tals registering more than 1,000 deliveries annually, the perinatal mortality rate per 1,000 was lowest in hospitals with intramural neonatal intensive care units (14.7), followed in ascending order by hospitals without NICUs, but which referred infants to the regional centers (16.9), and hospitals which provided neither intramural nor referral neonatal intensive care (19.1). The same pattern prevailed for both fetal/neonatal mortality rates, with the latter controlled for birth weight of the infant (1,000 to 2,500 grams and more than 2,500 grams). This is the most persuasive report to date from a methodologic veiwpoint documenting the association between Regional Perinatal Care and declining perinatal mortality rates. Predicted Effect of RPCP on Perinatal Deaths in North Carolina Predictions of the effect of RPCPs on perinatal deaths in North Carolina indicated that 30-50 percent of perinatal deaths are preventable in theory. However, analysis of North Carolina's vital statistics suggests that these predictions of reduction in mortality rate may take several years to achieve, and targets for the early stages of the program should be less ambitious. 7The lowest rate within each group (see article for data) may be taken as a realistic target for the early stages of the program. When these lowest rates are applied to the total population at risk, an estimated 4% reduction in the perinatal mortality rate is obtained. Evaluation Plan The evaluation plan should be flexible. It should measure achievement of objectives as they may change from year to year, which is likely to happen as this new program accumulates experience. The evaluation should be designed not only to determine whether the program did or did not reduce perinatal morbidity and deaths, but also to study the process by which regionalized perinatal care is supposed to lead to the desired improve- ments in perinatal health. The basic concept of the proposed evaluation design is that the program will move in small steps towards achieving its desired long-range outcomes (goals). The type of work (activity) and the amount of that work to be performed by a certain date (target) constitutes an objective and the totality of objectives at any one time determines the step. The longer-term, outcome- oriented goals, which remain fairly constant over, say a five-year period, are set at the beginning of the program. The shorter-term, process-oriented objectives are determined more frequently (e.g., yearly) and work toward the long-term goals. Thus, the objectives defined for any stage in program development are based on the progress achieved in preceding steps. Berger, Gary S., M.D., J. Richard Udry, Ph.D., and Charles H. Hendricks, M.D. 1975 "Regionalized Perinatal Care: An Estimate of Its Potential Effect on Racial Differences in Perinatal Mortality in North Carolina". North Carolina Medical Journal 36: 476-479. GENERAL ABSTRACT: In North Carolina, mortality rates for non-whites exceed those for whites at the perinatal period. Effective July 1, 1974, a program of regionalized perinatal care was undertaken in North Carolina with the goal of reducing morbidity and mortality through provision of adequate prenatal care and obstetrical delivery of high-risk patients in regional centers equipped to handle complications, and through development of regional centers for intensive care of the neonate. Because of the increased relative risk of perinatal mortality among non-whites, one result of regional perinatal care might be to narrow the gap in perinatal mortality between the white and non- white population in North Carolina. 8ANNOTATIONS: In 1970-1972, the crude perinatal mortality rate in North Carolina was 25.7 for whites and 41.0 for non-whites. The excess mortality rate for non- whites is consistent with the pattern that has been documented in all vital statistics reporting on this. When controlled for birth weight and length of gestation, perinatal mortality rates for non-whites were not significantly higher than for whites, and there were no significant differences in outcome by adequacy of number of prenatal visits or by type of hospital in which delivery occurred (with or without an NICU). These observations suggest that progress in eliminating the gap between the races in perinatal mortality in North Carolina will require control of the excess rate of prematurity among the non-white population, rather than simply providing more intensive prenatal or neonatal care services. Blake, Anthea, Ann Stewart and Diane Turcan 1977 "Perinatal Intensive Care". Journal of Psychosomatic Research 21: 261-272 GENERAL ABSTRACT: By 1966, intensive care had been introduced at University College Hospital, London. From that time, a follow-up study of the survivors has been in progress and includes repeated physical examinations, psychological and behavioral testing. Parents, also, have been interviewed about their attitudes and per- ceptions of their children. ANNOTATIONS: The results show that 17 (18%) of 205 infants weighing less than 1500 grams at birth and now aged 18 months have major handicaps. Among these 205 children, no difference in major handicap rate was found in infants born at University College Hospital and those referred from elsewhere; between those whose birth weight was appropriate for gestational age and those small for gestational age; or between those who received total parental nutrition and" those who did not. No difference in outcome was found between infants weighing 500-1000 grams and 1001-1500 grams. Also, there has been follow-up of other groups of high-risk infants whose survival rates have increased since the introduction of intensive care. No major handicap has been detected in 123 infants weighing 1501-2500 grams examined at 18 months of age. Three (5%) of 64 infants weighing greater than 1000 grams who were mechanically ventilated for hyaline membrane disease be- tween 1970-1974 were handicapped. None of the 29 infants with very severe rhesus haemolytic disease (including 16 who were hydropic), born during the period 1968-1974 have major handicaps. These results, together with those of other researchers, suggest that perinatal intensive care reduces the risk of handicaps in infants who survive serious perinatal problems and does not itself cause serious physical or emotional sequelae. 9Boehm, John J. 1976 "Identification of the High Risk Infant". Northwestern University Medical School — Division of Pediatrics^ prentice Women's Hospital and Maternity Center. Chicago, Illinois. GENERAL ABSTRACT: This is a brief summary of criteria, standards and suggestions for action for identifying high risk pregnancy cases as early as possible. Also, it contains a statement about transferring these infants. ANNOTATIONS; Every hospital, no matter how small or how few infants are delivered chere each year must be equipped to stabilize all infants during the transition from intra-to-extra-uterine life. This includes the capability to perform adequate resuscitation, treat shock, and provide an appropriate treatment area within the hospital or transferred to a center with facilities for managing the high risk infant. In addition, every hospital delivering infants must have a written procedure detailing the lines of referral for high risk infants. Bryant, Sandra, R.N. 1976 "Nursing Aspects and Organization for Perinatal Care". Clinics in Perinatology Organization for Perinatal Care 3:493-496. Guest Editor: Louis Gluck, M.D., Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders Company. GENERAL ABSTRACT: To effectively provide fetal intensive care nursing, it is important to consider the functions and duties of each category of the nursing team: (1) admission of the patient to the unit; (2) application of the fetal monitor and assessment of the data; (3) care of the mother in delivery; (4) care of the newborn at delivery; (5) postpartum recovery of the patient; (6) types and numbers of operative procedures done on the unit other than vaginal deliveries, such as postpartum tubal ligations and cesarean sections; (7) cleaning and wrapping of instruments; (8) extent of patient teaching; (9) staff development and evaluation; and (10) antepartum assess- ment, such as oxytocin challenge test. ANNOTATIONS: It is recommended that a hospital delivering 200 patients per month provide three nurses per shift, preferably registered nurses, and perhaps a fourth nurse depending upon the health status and number of patients in labor. If a significant percentage of the patients are known to be high risk, then the nurse to patient ratio should be increased to 1:1 or 1:2. 10Butterfield, Joseph L., M.D. 1976 "Newborn Country USA". Clinics in Perinatology: Organization for Perinatal Care 3:281-295. Guest Editor: Louis Gluck, M.D., Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders Company. GENERAL ABSTRACT: The Department of Perinatology of the Children's Hospital in Denver has adopted the theme of Newborn Country USA in an effort to sublimate corporate and professional egos to a common commitment to a regional perinatal care system. Both a marketing concept and a working model "Newborn Country USA", describes a region and a system. ANNOTATIONS: From a geographic viewpoint, Newborn Country USA is one of the largest perinatal markets in the United States. The vast region is best described by a line that connects Winnipeg, Minneapolis, Omaha, Kansas City, Oklahoma City, Dallas, San Antonio, Albuquerque, Tucson, Phoenix, Salt Lake City and Calgary. The 500,000 square mile territory that lies halfway between Denver and the next nearest full-service perinatal center is the catchment area from which Denver draws the bulk of neonatal and maternal referrals. The Newborn Country USA efforts to upgrade perinatal health care in rural communities have included: • Consultation in defining manpower, facility, equipment, laboratory and procedural needs in prenatal, intrapartum, postpartum and neonatal areas. For example, a checklist of nursery items has been prepared to assist in the survey of hospitals that request evaluation of their current capabilities in neonatal care. • Participation in regional health planning with emphasis on the perinatal component. • Advocation of the expansion of the EMS to include plans and protocols for the emergency care of high-risk mother and/or newborn. • Development of outreach perinatal education programs throughout the region. • Acceptance of administrators, volunteers, laboratory technicians, respiratory therapists, licensed practical nurses, registered nurses, supervisors and physicians from both the private practice and public health sectors as short-term trainees in the regional perinatal center, and affiliated Level II hospitals. 11• Utilization of residents and fellows in perinatal training as speakers in traveling clinics and workshops to increase their awareness of the special health needs in rural America. • Shifting of the public relations philosophy to a "perinatal partnership" emphasis that underscores the positive role of the rural health term in recognizing and stabilizing the high-risk mother or newborn prior to transfer to the regional perinatal center and the ongoing two-way relation- ship in consultation, education and planning. Butterfield, Joseph L., M.D. 1977 "Organization of Regional Perinatal Programs". Seminars in Perinatology: Regionalization of Perinatal Care 1:217-233. Guest Editor: Leo Stern, M.D., New York: Grune and Stratton. GENERAL ABSTRACT: This article addresses manpower needs of Regional Perinatal programs in the U.S. ANNOTATIONS: Based on Swyer's estimate of one neonatologist for each 2,500 live births, 1,280 neonatologists might be needed to serve the 3.2 million live births annually in the United States; 301 were listed in the January 1977 report of the American Board of Pediatrics. Since the great majority of live births take place in large metropolitan hospitals, the 534 hospitals reporting in excess of 1,500 deliveries per year would need at least 1,048 neonatal perinatal medicine specialists. The remaining 4,500 hospitals in the United States that report live births would not be strong candidates for full-time neonatal-perinatal medicine specialists except in isolated geographic areas, where low-volume perinatal services can be justified. In metropolitan and suburban areas, the hospitals serving as regional centers will take a variety of patterns in both personnel and administrative areas. It would appear timely to recommend updating residency training program to attain more equitable didactic and clinical teaching of the preventive and health promotional aspects of primary reproductive care pursued in an ambu- latory setting. In this context, teaching programs should also include increased emphasis on the emotional and mental health needs of patients, greater reliance on the multidisciplinary health team, and more discriminating use of available diagnostic and therapeutic modalities. The author states that in order to strengthen the delivery of reproductive health services greater application of the ambulatory approach is required, To achieve this end, the obstetrician-gynecologist and the resident in training must begin to appreciate that comprehensive surgical aspects of care traditionally performed at the inpatient level, but also that there is an even greater need for preventive and health promotional activities that can be performed in the office or other ambulatory settings. 12The emerging role of the obstetrician-gynecologist as a primary care physician for women interfaces elegantly with the expansion of the ambu- latory care concept of health care delivery. Carrier, Charles, M.D., et.al. 1973 Perinatal Intensive Care after Integration of Obstetrical Services in Quebec: A Policy Statement of the Quebec Perinatal Committee. Quebec, Canada. Available from: Quebec Perinatal Committee, Ministry of Social Affairs Province of Quebec, 1005 Chemin Ste-Foy, Quebec, Canada, G1S 4N4. GENERAL ABSTRACT: In this policy statement, the Perinatal Committee of the Ministry of Social Affairs examines the potential for Obstetrical and Neonatal Care in Quebec with regrouped obstetrical services. In particular, the question of minimum size of service necessary to provide a full range of perinatal services is explored. The possibility of providing both fetal and neonatal intensive care in each of the newly created enlarged centers is assessed, and the improved results in perinatal mortality and morbidity that can be expected to result from such a development are described. ANNOTATIONS: Predicted Perinatal Mortality After Obstetrical Integration In 1970, it is reported here that the perinatal mortality rate in Quebec for infants of over 1,000 grams was 17.9/1000. This rate was an average of high rates found in the smallest hospitals, average rates found in larger hospitals not utilizing neonatal intensive care, and low rates from larger hospitals utilizing referral or intramural neonatal intensive care. The 17.9 perinatal deaths per 1,000 can be broken down by cause of death into those deaths that are potentially reducible utilizing modern medical technology, and those for which there is little hope of reduction with the present state of medical knowledge. If all viable births survived, except for those with lethal malformations and those where the fetus died before labor of unpredictable or unexplained causes, the irreducible minimum perinatal mortality given today's level of knowledge is in the order of 8.5 per 1,000 births. This then leaves 9.4 perinatal deaths per 1,000 births in Quebec in 1970 that were potentially preventable. In comparing the rate of 11.6 per 1,000 obtained in a hospital where both Intramural Fetal and Neonatal Intensive Care were available, to the irreducible minimum rate of 8.5 per 1,000, the potential difference is 3.1 per 1,000 The rate of 14.7 obtained with Intramural Neonatal Intensive Care represented 6.2 potentially preventable deaths per 1,000 births. For those hospitals utilizing Referral Neonatal Intensive Care facilities, potentially preventable deaths were 8.4 per 1,000 and for those that utilized no intensive care 10.6 per 1,000. It is possible then to predict that, after small obstetrical services are absorbed following obstetrical integration, the number of perinatal deaths to be expected in Quebec among approximately 100,000 births each year will depend on intensive care facilities available, in the following manner; 131910 deaths without intensive care 1690 with Referral Neonatal Intensive Care 1470 with Intramural Neonatal Intensive Care 1160 with Intramural Fetal and Neonatal Intensive Care, as compared with an irreducible minimum of 850 per year. Size and Distribution of Obstetrical Services Providing Intensive Care The authors of this report would consider today that for rational utili- zation, obstetrical services providing Intramural Fetal and Neonatal Intensive Care should deliver between 3000 and 5000 infants per year. Above this size, the high delivery rate makes it difficult to maintain high standards of per- sonalized care. Below 3000 deliveries per year, there are insufficient high- risk pregnancies to develop a smoothly-functioning Intensive Care system, and one which is economically justifiable. It is noted here that the NICU service of a hospital delivering 5000 babies per year will utilize an average of 25 cots or incubators daily. Peak load periods may increase this figure by 40 percent, to 35 per day. Such a unit will treat 1000 patients per year with some degree of enhanced care. For 3000 deliveries per year, the corresponding figures would be an average of 15 patients per day with peaks of 21, treating about 600 patients per year. The number of obstetrical beds required for 5000 deliveries per year is 90 beds for a mean utilization rate of 85 percent, including the beds needed for antenatal high-risk patients in addition to the post-partum mothers. According to this report, 54 maternal beds will be needed to handle 3000 deliveries per year. These calculations are based on a 4-5 day stay for a normal delivery, with 15% of beds occupied by antenatal high-risk patients. Equipment needs for fetal I.C. surveillance in such a unit is estimated to amount to $34,000 (1973). Consolidating Services for Efficiency in Delivering NICU Even though personnel may not be immediately available for intensive care in all integrated obstetrical services, it is desirable to rapidly integrate maternity services into centers delivering 3000 to 5000 infants a year where- ever such size hospitals can be developed. In the remaining hospitals, it will be necessary at first to refer high-risk pregnancies to Perinatal Intensive Care Centers, and newborns requiring intensive care to Referral Centers in children's hospitals. The very fact, from a planning view, that these remaining hospitals, though presently lacking intensive care capability, will have been integrated into services delivering 3000-5000 infants per year, will act as a strong incentive for physicians to train in Perinatology and Neonatology as they will recognize that hospitals exist of sufficient size to require these services. The lack at the present time of maternity services of sufficient size to size to support NICU facilities provides a strong disincentive for doctors to specialize in these fields. 14Carrier, Charles, M.D. 1975 Report of the Quebec Perinatal Committee for Perinatal Mortality for the Year 1970 (First Part): Quebec Canada. Available from: Quebec, Perinatal Committee, Ministry of Social Affairs, Province of Quebec, 1005 Chemin Ste-Foy Ouebec, Canada, G1S 4N4. GENERAL ABSTRACT: The paper is an annual report on mortality by weight group, for the province, by region, and for hospitals grouped according to size and facili- ties for intensive care. It is meant to be understood that perinatal mortality provides a valuable index of the quality of health care for pregnant women and their newborn babies. Therefore, in studying this mortality, there is an attempt to find means to reduce death and morbidity rates and to improve the health of mother, fetus, and newborn infant. ANNOTATIONS: Birth Weight Experience The central committee obtained detailed reviews of individual perinatal deaths, births, stillborns, neonatal deaths, and weights from each hospital (Quebec Perinatal Committee). There were 96,071 total births weighing more than 500 grams during 1970. Of this number, only 622 weighed 501-1,000 grams, Five hundred and ninety-five of the 2,311 perinatal deaths were included among these 622 infants. There- fore, 25.7% of all perinatal deaths occurred in the 0.65% of the births weighing 501-1,000 grams. There were but 27 one-week survivors out of 407 live births in this weight group, or 6.6%. In addition, only 19 of the 27 who survived one week left the hospital alive. For the Province, as a whole, total births over 1,000 grams (including stillbirths and neonatal deaths) were 95,449 in 1970 as compared to 98,146 in 1969, 98, 729 in 1968, and 103,476 in 1967. The decrease in births over 1,000 grams is, therefore, 7.7% since 1967 and 2.8% since 1969. For the same year, 1970, the Population Registry reports 92,698 total births, which includes births of 28 weeks of gestation or more. In all, there were 96,071 total births weighing more than 500 grams, and of these there were 1,127 stillborn and 1,184 who died during the first complete week of life. Total mortality rates over 500 grams were: stillborn rate of 11.7% per 1,000 total births, neonatal mortality rate of 12.5 per 1,000 live births, and perinatal mortality of 24.1 per 1,000 total births. Among the 95,449 births weighing more than 1,000 grams, there were 912 stillbirths and 804 neonatal deaths. The total mortality rates per 1,000 for infants weighing more than 1,000 grams were: stillbirth rate of 9.6 neonatal mortality rate of 17.9. Size of Obstetrical Service Perinatal mortality is in general inversely proportional to the size of the obstetrical service measured by the number of births per year. In 1970, the lowest rates, 16.9-17.5 per 1,000 births over 1,000 grams, were found in 15hospitals performing more than 1,000 deliveries per year. The highest rates were those of hospitals delivering 251-500 infants per year, where there were 21.0 perinatal deaths per 1,000 births. The report shows that this increase in mortality with decreasing size of obstetrical service occurred in spite of the fact that the incidence of low birth weight was lower in the smaller than in the larger. The increase in perinatal mortality was due to a sticking increase in low birth weight neonatal mortality with decreasing size of obstetrical service, along with a less pronounced increase in over 2,500 grams neonatal deaths as well as in stillbirths. It is shown that 34% of the smallest hospitals (1-250 births per year), 23 percent of those with 251-500 births per year, and 10 percent of those with 501-1,000 births per year, had over 1,000 grams perinatal mortality rates of 27.0 per 1,000 or higher, whereas no hospital delivering more than 1,000 infants per year had mortality rates in this range. The following are included in the "Recommendations to Reduce Perinatal Mortality": • In order to produce a general improvement in perinatal care, the number of hospitals will have to be reduced such that each hospital retaining a maternity service will have significantly larger numbers of births. These hospitals could then gradually be provided with intensive care facilities. In 1970, 40 out of 49 hospitals in the Quebec region delivered fewer than 1,500 infants per year. • Since low birth weight neonatal mortality is greater in hospitals which refer patients after birth for intensive care facilities (Level III) , it is preferable in labors that begin prematurely to have the delivery take place in a center providing obstetrical intensive care in close relation to neonatal intensive care. If the 4% of women going into labor more than five weeks before term had been delivered in hospitals possessing perinatal intensive care facilities, the perinatal mortality rate would have been reduced by four deaths per 1,000 total births. • If intramural neonatal intensive care centers are not available in maternity hospitals. or if the problem is not predictable by the onset of labor, infants who are of low birth weight or sick should be transferred to a referral center for neonatal intensive care. 16Chase, Helen 1977 "Infant Mortality and its Concomitants, 1960-1972". Medical Care 15. 662-674. GENERAL ABSTRACT: A number of health indicators are used to examine the gap in health status between the poor and non-poor has narrowed in the period 1960-1972. ANNOTATIONS: Although the terms are recognized not to be synonymous, white and all other races are used as proxies for non-poor and poor respectively, because of un- availability of data according to the latter characteristics. During this period, the groups between white and all others have narrowed for fetal, neo- natal, postneonatal and maternal mortality. With regard to fertility, the gaps between white and all other races have narrowed for the maternal age groups beginning with 25 years of age; chief progress in narrowing the gaps was among higher birth orders. On a maternal age base, the gap in the propor- tions of illegitimate births of racial groups appears to be widening. Chez, Ronald A., M.D.; Harold E. Fox, M.D.; John C. Hobbins, M.D.; George J. Peckham, M.D.; E. Derek Peske, M.D.; Mary Halderman 1978 "Monitor Every Patient in Labor?" Patient Care 12; 136-163. GENERAL ABSTRACT; In this article, a panel of perinatologists spells out the indications, benefits, and pitfalls of fetal and neonatal monitoring in the community hospital. They also point to telemetry as a future trend to make fetal monitoring more acceptable to patients. ANNOTATIONS; Indications of Fetal Monitoring These categories of patients in a community hospital should always be monitored: diabetes, hypertension, renal disease, and Rhesus factor diseases. Other indications for high-risk patients in a community hospital are post- maturity, premature labor, or prolonged labor. In general, any patient (according to these physicians) who develops a risk after presenting in labor is a specific candidate for fetal monitoring in the community hospital. Also, a patient receiving continuous conduction anesthesia should be monitored. Dr. Fox recommends monitoring every birth because 30% of the high-risk labors occur in low-risk pregnancies. 17There are studies that show a decrease in cerebral palsy and other forms of brain injury with monitoring: Dr. Hobbins comments: A study in Australia definitely showed a decrease in morbidity and neurologic sequelae in monitored patients, It was not a pure study of monitoring because fetal heart rate monitoring played only a part in the intensive care of the fetus. In other words, they had a control group of patients who were not monitored and a series of patients whom they followed in what they called a fetal intensive care unit, where they also used hormonal assays and other such special tests. They did find that fetuses subjected to this type of intensive scrutiny and monitoring did better as far as long-term neurologic sequelae were concerned. Fetal.heart rate monitoring played a big part but not an exclusive one in this improvement. The article points out that there are five areas in which morbidity potentially may be increased as a result of fetal monitoring with the invasive techniques, such as the scalp clip: • Fetal scalp infections occur with about a 1:230 frequency. These have been a straightforward, local type of infection and not of any systematic severity. • Misapplication to the fetal part has the unlikely potential of cosmic injury. • Increased incidence of amnionitis is a concern in some situations — but it is the lesser risk, rather than not to monitor in the same situations. • Uterine perforation is possible, but rare. • Placental perforation would also be a rare complication. Dr. Fox notes that of the factors contributing to the increased caesarian section rate, 80% can be attributed to altered concepts on breech delivery and pathology of labor progress. Fetal distress accounts for 20 percent of the increase. The physicians suggest that special fetal heart rate monitoring equipment can be placed in the community hospital with a "telephone hook-up" in order for the fetal heart rate to be monitored by a specialist at the other end of the phone. The problem with this system involved a lack of use. A major role of regional neonatal intensive care centers should be to continually educate community hospital personnel in the uses of new equipment, In this case, it is suggested and the community hospital personnel were not throughly educated in the uses and advantages of the fetal monitoring telephone system. Cost of Equipment An individual charge of $35 to $50 will financially sustain a monitoring system. ($35 is based on 3,000 births a year. The cost certainly varies with the delivery base.) Most brands of monitoring equipment are equivalent; the key variable is repair backup. Telemetry systems are expected to be used in the near future to augment present equipment. 18Telemetry A practical alternative in monitoring fetal heart rate in the near future. Telemetry consists of a small FM transmitter usually taped to the patient's thigh and a nearby receiver that can feed the impulses to the monitor. The patient can walk around as the heart rate and uterine acti- vity are recorded. In most cases, telemetry for fetal monitoring will simply be an adaptation of currently existing equipment. For Additional Information The following physicians should be contacted if more information con- cerning fetal heart rate monitoring and its uses in perinatal intensive care is needed: Ronald A. Chez, M.D.: Howard University College of Medicine Washington, D. C. Harold E. Fox, M.D.: University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry Rochester, N. Y. John C. Hobbins, M.D.;Yale School of Medicine New Haven, Ct. Clifford, Stewart, M.D. 1964 "Medical Progress, High-Risk Pregnancy. Prevention of Prematurity and the Sine Qua Non For Reduction of Mental Retardation and Other Neurologic Disorders." The New England Journal of Medicine 271: 243-249. GENERAL ABSTRACT: Dr. Clifford focuses on newborn mortality rates and discusses some causes of mortality which have been cited in the British Perinatal Mortality Survey. ANNOTATIONS: Mortality Rates Generally, Dr. Clifford notes that the most important causes of mental retardation are associated with pregnancy, particularly with premature births. He says, further, that nationwide results achieved by many maternity institu- tions testify that a fetal mortality rate of 15 and a neonatal mortality rate of 6 to 8 percent should be within the reach of all. Dr- Clifford agrees that these figures can be reduced. 19Live-Born Premature Infants The neonatal mortality rate is, in general, directly proportional to the incidence of live-born premature infants. Under the most favorable condi- tions the mature infants will contribute only three deaths per 1000, whereas the premature infants, with a mortality rate of 15 percent will be responsi- ble for 12 deaths on the basis of a relatively low premature birth rate of 8 percent. Dr. Clifford points out that 11 deaths per 1000 births at the Boston Lying-In Hospital (fifteen-year study 1949-63) resulted in premature stillborn infants. Hence, some 23 fetal-newborn premature deaths per 1000 births are theoretically preventable. The British Perinatal Mortality Survey has summarized a number of findings that should permit the identification of high-risk patients early in the pregnancy. Demographic data from the British survey shows that infant loss is higher in the first than in the second delivery and in the semiskilled and unskilled social classes. The risk to the infant is 60 percent greater if the pregnancy is illegitimate. The infant mortality steadily rises with increasing maternal age. The British survey records that there is a significantly higher perinatal mortality in a subsequent pregnancy for patients who have had an abortion or ectopic pregnancy. In patients who have had a previous premature live-born infant, the stillbirth and neonatal mortality is even higher in later pregnancies, and for those who have had previous stillbirths or neonatal deaths, the perinatal mortality is still higher. Vaginal bleeding before the twenty-eighth week was present in 2.9 percent of patients, with an overall perinatal mortality double the national average; these cases were associated with a high incidence of premature delivery. If pregnancy continued to near term, there was still an appreciable increased perinatal risk. It was concluded that a history of toxemia and ante-partum hemmorrhage is invariably an indication for special care. Concerning labor and delivery, the British Survey records that the maturity of pregnancy was of immense importance to the fetal outcome. At forty weeks, the perinatal mortality was two-fifths the national average; the risk increased by 50 percent at forty-two weeks, and by nearly 100 percent before thirty-eight or after forty-three weeks. Postmature births at forty-two weeks and above occurred in 11.5 percent of the patients, being more frequent in younger mother, nulliparas and grand multiparas and in those of lower socioeconomic backgrounds. Dr. Clifford concludes that there is promise that a reduction in mental retardation and other neurologic disorders will accompany reduction in peri- natal mortality. He believes that our strongest efforts should be directed toward identifying high-risk births as early as possible and treating the high-risk pregnancy appropriately. 20Committee on Perinatal Health 1976 Toward Improving the Outcome of Pregnancy. White Plains, New York The National Foundation March of Dimes. GENERAL ABSTRACT: This document provides recommendations and suggestions for use in planning by the providers of obstetric and pediatric care and for agencies concerned with maternal and infant health. With the aid of these recommendations, a model for organizing and improving resources providing prenatal and perinatal services can be designed for the population base under study. ANNOTATIONS: The Committee describes the three levels of newborn services which are described throughout the literature and in these annotations. Hence, here the concentration will be on personnel requirements and training. Personnel Requirements in Level I Units For Consultation — It is desirable to have specialists from Level II and Level III units on the staff of the Level I unit as consultants. In Labor and Delivery — Two or more qualified professional nurses or certified nurse-midwives continuously available on call to be in attendance to women admitted in labor. All deliveries should be attended by a physician, or where necessary and where acceptable, by a certified nurse-midwife under the supervision of a physician. Personnel Requirements in Level II Units Direction and Administration — Each institution should have one board- certified obstetrician with special interest, training and experience in hiqh- risk obstetrics and one board-certified pediatrician with special interest, training and experience in neonatology to serve as co-directors. There should be a Supervisor of Perinatal Nursing Services with overall responsibility for inpatient activities in the maternity-newborn unit. In Labor and Delivery — The obstetrician who is co-director of the Level II unit should be the Director of the Obstetrical Department and will, with the other physicians and the nursing staff, define and establish standardized procedures for all obstetric patients. Full-time nurses with specialized training and anesthesiologists should be available at all times. Note: Requirements for Level III have been annotated in other "note" sets. Preparatory and Continuing Education in a Regional System A major function in a regional system for the delivery of perinatal and prenatal health services is that of preparatory and continuing education. 21Level III units must exert leadership in establishing educational programs and, to a large extent, in carrying these out. The regional centers will have full-time staff in all the health science disciplines. Their qualifications should include demonstrated competence in teaching and training. The assign- ment of their service responsibilities should allow adequate time for their teaching activities throughout the region. Responsibility for planning and providing educational services in a region should be assigned to a small, multidisciplinary group at the Level III units. The various types of educational services to be considered include one or two-day didactic symposia presenting new technologic and scientific advances; short courses, ranging from a few weeks duration, for didactic teaching and practical application; longer courses with academic credit toward a degree or toward meeting requirements of a certifying board. Education for Career Advancement Educational programs must be made available to staff at all levels of responsibility throughout the component hospitals in the region. Continuity of Care in Consultation and Referral In both consultation and referral, continuity of care in meeting the patient's needs is the basic consideration. This will be fostered to the extent that there is abundant interaction among all components of the regional system. This interaction should include participation of referring physicians, to the fullest possible extent, in the diagnosis and management of problems requiring consultation and for arranging transfer must be clearly established and under- stood. Equipment and trained personnel for the transfer must be available at the Level III units. Financing In a regional system of care, new costs will be generated due to increase in consultation, increase in the number of infants transferred from one hospital to another and increase in the number of patients to whom expensive technology and expertise will be available. Cost recovery is a major concern of the providers of care and the magnitude of these costs for complicated prenatal and perinatal illness exceeds the ability of most families to pay. If the financial barrier to extension and improvement of perinatal services is to be lessened or eliminated, new sources of funds must be created for both capital outlay and for operation of services. The benefits in terms of reduction of infant mortality and of life-long handicapping condi- tions will fully justify increased expenditures. Model Budget Model budgets for the operation of the different levels of newborn care facilities are presented. 22Level II Unit (2,000 deliveries with Neonatal Special Care Unit of 8 beds): Total Operational Budget $1,192,698.00 1. Personnel 2. Expenses 3. Education $ 749,068.00 $ 439,356.00 $ 5,000.00 Level III Regional Perinatal Care Center: Total Operation Budget $2,637,095.00 1. Personnel 2. Expenses 3. Regional Education $1,712,496.00 $ 876,092.00 $ 48,507.00 Donahue, Charles Jr., M.A., Lou Freedman, Robert Danley, Ph.D., Ann Pettigrew, M.D., Nancy Shaughnessy, Sarah Fogerty, R.N. 1976 "The Use of Vital Events as a Data Source in the Planning of Maternity and Newborn Services". Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Public Health Association, October 21, 1976, Miami, Florida. GENERAL ABSTRACT: This paper discusses some possible uses of data that are currently being collected by most states throughout the country. These data could be used for health systems planning in the development of regional newborn care systems. The uses discussed by the authors were developed by the Massachusetts Maternity and Newborn Regionalization Project working with the Office of Health Statistics and the Massachusetts Department of Public Health. ANNOTATIONS: Live Births - Fluctuations and Trends It is important to follow over time the number of births per year by resi- dence of mother and hospital of birth. Therefore, (1) the residence of mother and (2) the hospital of birth should be collected from the live birth certificate. Birth Rate, General Fertility Rate, Percent of Population - Women Aged 15-44 Differences in the fertility experience of women living in different areas can be helpful in making projections of the future need for fertility-related health services. Future "needs" for acute in-patient beds, prenatal care visits at family planning services should be based on a consideration of past general fertility rates. The source of this data is the live birth certificate, U.S. Census. The significant items are (1) residence of mother, (2) women aged 15-44, and (3) total population by residence. 23Low Birth Weight Infants Areas with a disproportionately high percentage of low birth weight infants should be identified for more in-depth analysis. With an effective system for "prebooking" high risk mothers in tertiary perinatal centers, higher percentages of low birth weight infants would be expected in facili- ties providing this "level of care". Similarly, hospitals providing lower "levels of care" would not be expected to care for high percentage of low birth weight infants. High Risk Newborn Transfer The authors agree with Swyer's report on transfer of high risk newborns. A transfer percent can be obtained by comparing neonatal deaths by hospital of birth with hospital of death. Those deaths occurring in neonatal inten- sive care units are credited toward the "transfer" percent. The authors accept definitions of "referring" and "transfer" which are outlined by Usher. The live birth certificate is the source of information for (1) hospital of birth and (2) hospital of death. Duxbury, Mitzi L., M.D. 1977 "Personnel and Staffing Needs for Perinatal Programs". Seminars in Perinatology Regionalization of Perinatal Care. 1:267-278. Guest Editor: Leo Stern, M.D. New York: Grune and Stratton. GENERAL ABSTRACT: Personnel issues have become critical considerations in developing region- alized perinatal care systems. The author summarizes the functions of a region- alized perinatal system, personnel required for these functions, concerns re- garding present medical and nursing staffing approaches and some possible solutions. ANNOTATIONS: Tasks of a Perinatal Care Center These include service to patients (both in-house and within the region); basic and continuing education to center and regional personnel; research; and administration to perform these functions as well as enabling communications and supporting evaluation of the system. Patient-Centered Team Approach The definition and utilization of a "perinatal health care team" may vary considerably. A team may be defined as all personnel (medical, nursing, social workers, therapists, nutritionists, technicians, religious personnel, administra tors, maintenance workers) or as all the specialized health care teams within a 24region. Additional concepts of a team stress the family as a team member or by definition and/or practice exclude the family member. The definition one selects for a "health care team" has significant implications for the staffing requirements necessary to meet the goals of the perinatal center. The health care team at the center can be broadly defined as composed of nurses, nutritionists, physicians, social workers, respiratory therapists, physical therapists, supportive services such as community health nurses, homemakers, home health aides, laboratory, x-ray and ultra-sound technicians, religious advisors, administrators, and the family. This team concept includes all providers in the system and provides for referral, consultation, continuity, and follow-up. Staffing of the Tertiary Care Unit With the intensively ill newborn infant, a ratio of one nurse per patient is not unusual, or in extreme situations two nurses to one infant. Some workable staffing methodology, based on patient care needs, to allow for these situations must be identified to establish functional staffing patterns. In addition to in-house service responsibilities, consideration must be given to educational needs in the region. Nurse Attrition in Neonatal Intensive Care Centers Attrition rates for nurses are as high as 180% annually. Rates of 80%-90% are not uncommon. Further efforts are needed to remedy the dynamics behind this phenomenon. Patient care is compromised when personnel are in- experienced and in the process of learning. Medical Staffing in Neonatal Intensive Care Centers There is a dearth of written material in relation to staffing methodologies necessary for adequate medical coverage. The number of staff contingent upon many factors: hard monies provided by institutions, the amount of soft monies the medical staff was able to garner, the needs for research, and education of medical personnel. Staffing approaches are somewhat different when the funds were earmarked specifically for service rather than for education and research. Almost all of the neonatologists interviewed by the author expressed some dis- satisfaction with the need to provide service coverage using persons whose primary need is for education or research experience. These divergent goals of the training programs often detract from the primary responsibility of a tertiary care center. 25Effer, S.B., M.D. 1969 "Management of High-Risk Pregnancy: Report of a Combined Obstetrical and Neonatal Intensive Care Unit". Canadian Medical Association Journal 101: 55-63. GENERAL ABSTRACT: The methodology, equipment and personnel required to carry out an intensive care program in the management of high-risk pregnancies have been outlined. The perinatal mortality rate has been determined and its. etiology has been analyzed in this section. Here are three conditions in which the degree of high risk is such as to warrant provision of the complete facilities of the service described: a) severe pre-eclampsia; b) marked intrauterine growth retardation with placental insufficiency as determined from serial measurements of uterine growth and estriol determinations; and c) irreversible labor in premature pregnancies where a birth weight of 2,220 grams or less is anticipated. ANNOTATIONS: An already existing area of 14 antepartum beds was selected to care for high-risk infants. These are adjacent to the labor unit and to the OB and NICU. Nursing Personnel The antepartum ward for high-risk pregnancies was found to require a ratio of one nurse to four patients on each of the day and evening shifts, and one to six on the night shift; in addition to the above, one extra nurse on each shift was available for patients in labor. The requirements, after pro-rating for time off, sickness and vacation time, place the total staff requirements at approximately one nurse per 100 annual deliveries. Medical Personnel The obstetrical team consisted of one obstetrician director, who is oriented as a perinatal physiologist, one full-time resident, the junior house staff and the attending private physiciand and/or obstetrician. Paramedics (Electronic) The constantly available supervision of the equipment by a technician was found essential in view of the frequency of needed electronic adjustments. It was found that one full-time technician would be required to handle the load of 100 patients per year monitored in labor. 26Biochemistry Personnel The carrying out of blood-gas and acid-base estimates, the calculation of the values on line, and of blood gases for the newborn were found to require two full-time technicians where 200 to 250 patients are monitored. Prognostic Risk Scores An attempt was made to find a qualitative expression of the degree of risk of perinatal death faced by any one patient. Statistical information used to develop this scoring was taken from two main studies: "Supplement to the Second Report of the Perinatal Mortality Study in Ten University Teaching Hospitals, Ontario, Canada," and the first report of the 1958 British Perinatal Mortality Survey. Using the methods developed, the NICU would have expected a total of 10 perinatal deaths in their study (a rate of 47.8/1,000 total births). The actual results showed eight perinatal deaths (37,2/1,000 births). With the introduction of a well managed intensive care unit for high risk newborns a 20% reduction has been achieved. The article shows that 89% of random patients going into labor had a Prognostic Risk core of 50 or less. A general estimate has frequently sug- gested that 10 of all pregnancies have some increased risk. It is pointed out that using the scoring system explained, any score above 50 represents high-risk pregnancies. Conclusions The author concludes that a method of improved education of the undergraduate the postgraduate and the practicing physicians should be sought. In both out- lying communities and in university centered programs, an exchange of residents in family-practice or specialty-training programs with practicing physicians and specialists might prove useful, Mutual benefits may accrue, on the one hand, by an awareness of actual problems and practices in outlying areas. Egan, Edmund A., Richard Boothby, and E, Charlton Prather 1975 "Florida Regional Neonatal Intensive Care Program — Impact on Mental Retardation" Journal of the Florida Medical Association 62: 36-39. GENERAL ABSTRACT: The disabled patient, with severely limited intellectual capacity as a primary component of his disability, has little to be a personally or socially independent individuals. Such patients place a major burden on their families 27and communities; also they have great difficulty in achieving minimal personal contentment for themselves. This article explains a follow-up study program of individuals who required intensive care at or around the time of birth. ANNOTATIONS: In 1971, it was reported that very small prematures (less than 1,500 gram birth weight), cared for in a neonatal intensive care unit, showed only a 10% incidence of impairment, rather than the previously reported 50%. Such a finding has been confirmed from other centers. These data, documenting the social benefit available from perinatal care, generated the creation of an organization now known as the Florida Perinatal Intensive Care Program in 1972. An integral part of the RNICC program is the post discharge evaluation of survivors. All infants under 1,500 gram birth weight are entered into the evaluation program, which documents their physical and mental development after discharge. A random sample of 20% of infants over 1,500 grams birth weight is also followed in serial fashion. These are evaluated both by a pediatrician and by a pediatric neurologist or psychologist. All children in the evaluation program are examined at age six months, one year, two years, four years, and six years. The dates of evaluations are adjusted for prematurity in the first two evaluations, so that the survivors who were born premature are measured against scales for cohorts at the same time, rather than those born at the same time. Results of Florida's RNICC Evaluation Program, 1974-1975: Birth Wt. Birth Wt. 1500 gm. 1500 gm. No. evaluated 95 135 No. judged normal 88 123 No. judged abnormal 7 12 percent abnormal 7% 9% percent normal 93% 91% The authors feel that this lends credence to the hypothesis that over 90% of these infants will continue to be measured normal as their evaluation progresses. Yet, they do note that longitudinal program may tend to over esti- mate impairment in the early evaluations. Ellis, William C., M.D. 1975 "How Maternal and Infant Care Has Been Improved in New Jersey". Contemporary OB/GYN 6: 73-77, GENERAL ABSTRACT: This article describes the development of Regional Perinatal Intensive Care in a Level III NICU in New Jersey. Aspects of the discussion include: 28• A system of communication that is unencumbered and bidirectional between the institutions of the region and their personnel; • An ongoing education program; • An evaluation process that has received the cooperation of all the institutions within the region resulting in an ever-increasing compliance in utilizing the system. ANNOTATIONS; Dr. Ellis discusses the regional newborn unit at Monmouth Medical Center Long Beach, New Jersey, established in 1968. The criteria recommended for the NICU at Monmouth are similar to those formulated by the Ad Hoc Committee on Perinatal Health formed by the AMA, the COG and AAFP, AAP. Criteria for Neonatal Transfer • Mortality risk 25% or greater (gestational age less than 33 weeks or weight less than 2,000 grams), • Mortality risk 4% to 25% with (a) placental or cord accident (b) apgar score less than 6 at 5 minutes (gestational age 33-36 weeks or weight less than 2,500 grams). • Respiratory distress and metabolic acidosis persisting after four hours of age or requiring ambient 02 in excess of 40% after four hours of age. • Infant of diabetic mother. • Neonatal seizures. • Known isoimmunization prior to 36 weeks gestation with L/S ratio 2:1 • Persistent cysnosis without respiratory distress syndrome. • Suspected neonatal sepsis and/or meningitis. • Congenital anomalies requiring observation for neonatal surgery. Findings Reported from Evaluation • Intensive care techniques applied in inappropriately staffed and organized nurseries deleteriously affect those infants whom they are intended to help. • Over a five-year period, 1969-1972, a study revealed an inverse relationship between the percentage of infants transferred by the regional hospitals and the neonatal mortality rate. 29• Another demonstration of the value of perinatal transfer for a single user institution was at the Hunterdon Medical Center. The rate of perinatal loss of infants with a mortality risk greater than 25% dropped from 702.7 per 1,000 live births in the years 1968-1970 to 479.2 during 1971-1973. Transportation Transportation of newborns to the Monmouth Medical Center is handled under contract by an ambulance service that bills the families directly. Mothers are transported through private arrangements or by local first-aid squads. Education An education program provides resource personnel for conferences, lecturers, and courses in hospitals served by the Center. An important part of the regional perinatal program and the Center are the perinatal workshops for physician-nurse teams at which specific problems are discussed in depth. The program provides site visits to hospitals to advise on staffing and equipment, on improving communications, and on policies and procedures within labor-delivery and within nursery areas to handle certain risk problems. Other innovative services are provided by a group of women volunteers who are starting to function on a regional basis. Most of them were at one time high-risk mothers, so they have firsthand knowledge of what being at high-risk means. These volunteers are working in three areas: They function at the Center as surrogate mothers, helping feed the growing babies who have been transferred. They also will provide companionship for mothers who have been separated from their own communities. A third area of activity is at the referring institution, where a woman volunteer visits the mother whose baby has been taken away for care at the Center. Ferrara, Angelo, M.D., and Lucille Perrotta, M.D. 1976 "Infant Transport Services: An Overview". Pediatric Annals 5:25-45. GENERAL ABSTRACT: New York City's experience with transporting high-risk neonates is traced and guidelines for developing and operating a transport system are reviewed. ANNOTATIONS: Vehicles If all transporting to be done is within a relatively small area, such as an urban center, some type of ground vehicle is best. If transports are made over long distances, (greater than 50 to 75 miles), aircraft will be fastest. 30According to federal specification, there are three types of ambulances which are adequate: (1) conventional cab chassis with modular ambulance body; (2) standard van, forward-control integral cab-body ambulance; and (3) specialty van, forward-control integral cab-body ambulance. (Some suggestions, specific for infant ambulances, are discussed in the Canadian Pediatric Society handbook on transport of the newborn and the American Academy of Pediatrics "Standards and Recommendations for Hospital Care of Newborn Infants.") Equipment Basic to transport is the portable emergency kit. The basic kit might include: • Laryngoscope with infant premature-size blades • Endotracheal tubes • Medications: •• Calcium gluconate, 10% •• Epinephrine, 1:10,000 •• Sodium bicarbonate •• Dextrose, 50% •• Normal saline •• Sterile water •• Vitamin K •• Heparin •• Isproterenol • Syringes: 2 1/2-cc., 10-cc, 20~cc • Needles, size 23, 20, 18 • Three-way stopcock • Alcohol swabs • Airways: sizes for infant and premature • Dextrostix If the sending hospital is poorly stocked, equipment can be provided in kits that are kept sterilized and ready and can be easily used when needed. Suggested kits should include: • Thoractomy kit • Tracheostomy kit • Lumbar puncture kit • Combined umbilical catheterization, vessel cut-down, and suture kit • Parenteral fluid kit • Bacteriologic sampling kit Travel Physicians should always accompany: (1) infants under 1,000 grams, (2) neonates requiring assisted ventilation, (3) newborns with chest tubes in place, (4) infants with history of apnea spells or those with moderate to severe respiratory distress, and (5) any infant whose referring doctor requests physician accompaniment. 31Cost Cost factors should be considered when planning a transport system. Simple unit cost per transport can be calculated by dividing the total budget by the number of calls. It is suggested that medical economists make use of the benefit-cost ratio for program analysis. By this method, present dollar value of future benefits and costs, direct and indirect, are compared. When the benefit- cost ratio is greater than 1:1, the program is deemed praiseworthy. This method may be applied in evaluating the cost of NICUs. Ferrara, Angelo, M.D., Ph.D. 1977 "Evaluation of Efficacy of Regional Perinatal Programs". Seminars in Perinatology: Regionalization of Perinatal Care 1: 303-308. Guest Editor: Leo Stern, M.D., New York: Grune and Stratton. GENERAL ABSTRACT: This article addresses the assumptions of evolving perinatal programs (facility and manpower planning, levels of care and infant transport) and approaches to evaluation of perinatal services. Specific components of structural, process and outcome evaluations are discussed. ANNOTATIONS: Structural Evaluation The purpose of structural evaluation is to determine bed need per population group. A methodology for determining the number of neonatal beds necessary for tertiary care is used as an example: Bed Need Newborns in Need of Care Level x ALOS 365 A total of 25-30 beds per neonatal center is suggested. Swyer's one, full-time neonatologist/2,500 live births is used if one attempts to determine physician needs in an unresearched area. Nursing personnel need is better understood. For neonatal intensive care (tertiary care), the nurse-patient ratio should be 1:1, while special care areas (secondary care level) require a ratio of 1:3. To calculate the number of nursing personnel necessary for a unit of 20 beds (16 special care and 4 intensive care), the following steps would be used: 32• Five staff nurses are required to ensure a nurse on duty 21 shifts per week. (Since each nurse works five shifts a week, 21/5, or 4.2 nurses are needed. Add to this vacation and educa- tional time, and it is clear that five nurses would be essential.) • To calculate the nurse complement for one shift: a ratio of 1:3 for special (secondary) care for 16 babies = 5.3 nurses; a ratio of 1:1 for intensive (tertiary) care for 4 babies = 4 nurses; thus, a total of 9.3 nurses is found. • To have all shifts covered: 9.3 x 5 (see (a) above) = 46.5 nurses, the ideal complement for this unit. Process Evaluation This is a means-oriented assessment applying per group established criteria as the evaluative measure. Most of the time process evaluation is performed by chart review. The example of Respiratory Distress Syndrome and the use of a sample table of criteria are discussed. Major classifica- tions for criteria are: maternal history, data from infant's physical examination at delivery, laboratory tests performed and therapy provided at delivery and in the special care nursery. Transport criteria used in New York City are also discussed. Outcome Evaluations This is the most useful goal-oriented outcome assessment. Percentage of mortality is readily assessed. However, long-term disability, discomfort and social disruption of the family are not easily measured. Variables which can predict perinatal mortality should be identified and tested. An example of one effort involved analysis of weight, age, five-minute Apgar score and temperature of infants at referral site pickup by the New York City Infant Transport Service. A 20% random sample was analyzed by weight group. Age at pickup did not differ significantly when three- year survival rates were examined. High Apgar socres (^ 7) were good predictors for increased survival rates, especially in the weight group less than 2,000 grams. Higher temperature at pickup (7> 36° C) was related to increased survival in all weight groups. Fitzhardinge, Pamela M., M.D. 1976 "Follow-up Studies on the Low Birth Weight Infant". Clinics in Perinatology: Organization for Perinatal Care 3: 503-516. Guest Editor: Louis Gluck, M.D. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders Company. GENERAL ABSTRACT: This report provides an overview of the nature of follow-up studies on the health of high-risk neonates. 33ANNOTATIONS: In a prospective study of 179 very low birth weight infants dis- charged from the Intensive Care Nursery at the Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, 10 (3.5%) died during the first year of life. Half of these deaths were associated with systematic infections or severe developmental defects. The remainder of the deaths were sudden and unexplained. The healthy premature whose birth weight is appropriate for gesta- tional age can be expected to grow at the same velocity as a full-term infant of the same post-conceptual age. Even infants with very low birth weight, appropriate for gestational age, born prior to 32 weeks follow this pattern. Growth failure occurs in two types of low birth weight infants: those who are small for gestational age at birth, and those who, although appropriately sized at birth, fail to grow during the first 4 to 6 weeks of postnatal life because of inadequate nutrition. Prior to intensive care for the neonate, the incidence of major neurological defects ranged as high as 15% for all low birth weight survivors and up to 40% for the very low birth weight survivors (see article for reference). Among the major changes seen following the introduction of intensive care have been not only a fall in neonatal mortality, but also a dramatic reduction in the frequency of the neurological lesions in the survivors. Various published results indicate that early recognition of the high-risk pregnancy with delivery of the neonate in a center where immediate care can be instituted may improve the outcomes of pregnancies even more than has been accomplished. Such nurseries tend to have a lower incidence of severe respiratory failure with a smaller proportion of babies requiring ventilatory support. Giles, Harlan R., M.D., Jerry Isaman, M.A., William J. Moore, M.D. and C.D. Christian, M.D. 1977 "The Arizona High-Risk Maternal Transport System: An Initial View". American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 128: 400-407. GENERAL ABSTRACT: This article profiles the Arizona Perinatal Program's high-risk maternal transport system. Characteristics of the first 357 consecutive maternal transport patients (a high-risk parturient patient specifically referred for specialized care) to one Level III Center are discussed and presented for comparison with other regions. 34Ethnic background, age, previous pregnancy experience, frequency of prenatal visits indications for transport, associated medical problems, referred trends made of transport, and transport outcome are discussed in light of the data. ANNOTATIONS; The principal reasons for transport among the 357 patients were: premature labor (106 patients), pre-eclampsia (78), premature rupture of membranes (74), inadequate local facilities (73), associated medical problems (59), placental bleeding (38), abnormal lie (27), multiple gestation (25), abnormal OB Hy (22), Rh sensitivity (22) and difficult labor (9). The maternal transport rate per 1,000 live births ranged from 0 to 18.0. The overall rate for Arizona is 4.4. Maricopa County (Phoenix) has a rate of 0.003 per 1,000 live births. Gluck Louis, M.D. 1970 "Design of a Perinatal Center". Pediatrics Clinics of North America. 17: 777-791. GENERAL ABSTRACT: This article discusses principles of planning and design of Perinatal Care Centers. Dr. Gluck specifies maternal, labor and infant high-risk factors which identify target groups for specialized care. The programs of the University Hospital, San Diego, California are described. The reference is particularly useful for its summary of space and design standards. ANNOTATIONS: Specifications for a special care unit for newborns providing intensive care, intensive observation and selected chronic and convalescent care for all newborns (and certain young infants) who requite special care: Number of Infants A 40-infant capacity is ideal; minimum size should be 20-25 infants. A 55-infant unit is too large. 35PERSONNEL (FULL-TIME CIRCULATION—MAXIMAL FIGURES) Total Nurses 10 i per shift 42 per 24 hours Physicians (attending) 1 or 2 4 per day Fellows 3 3 per day House staff 3 3 per day Nursing students 3 to 6 12 per week Graduate nurse trainees 2 50 per year Medical students 4 80 per year Ancillary personnel 3 15 per day Technicians, clergy and parents should be considered as well. There may be up to 33 persons in the unit at one time. Space Requirements Infant care areas. For 40 infants—minimum (30 sq.ft, per infant) = 1,200 sq.ft.; maximum (50 sq.ft, per infant) = 2,000 sq.ft. For 25 infants—minimum = 750 sq.ft.; maximum = 1,250 sq.ft. (The minimum of 30 sq.ft, per infant probably is not a true minimum, but it allows for exigencies without extreme discomfort; 20 sq.ft, is probably the absolute minimum.) Additional Space Space Type Dimensions Exchange transfusion and minor C 8 X 12 surgery X-ray room D 6 X 6 Nurses' station C - Conference room, library, lounge T 14 x 30 Scrub area C 5 X 8 Laboratory R + D - Sleep-in for house staff c 8 X 12 Parent education (2 rooms) c 5 X 7 each Social service c 6 X 8 Toilet c 5 X 5 Lounge & Locker c - Utility & Preparation room C + R 6 X 8 Storage c - Study Unit C + R - Officers—2(Residents, head nurse) c 5 X 7 C = Service areas for care T = Teaching space D = Diagnostic space R = Research space 36Suggestions for Equipment for Other Rooms • Exchange transfusion and minor surgery (8 x 12 ft.; 4 or 5 people): infant operating table, operating room lights, storage cabinents, scrub sink, stools (about 4), Mayo stand, infant warmer or crib, occasional table (monitoring). • X-ray room (6x6 ft.; 1 or 2 persons): table, overhead x-ray unit. • Nurses' station (4 or 5 persons): built-in desk, chairs, table top equipment, intercom, etc. Should include permanent space for a secretary control point. • Conference room (14 x 30 ft.; up to 20 or more people): conference table (4 x 8 ft.) 20 chairs, projector table, screen, x-ray viewer, blackboard, bulletin, 3 or 4 large chairs, bookshelves, kitchenette. May also be used as library, lounge, etc. • Scrub area (5x8 ft.; 2 persons): 2 sinks, gown rack or shelves, coat rack. • Sleep-in room for house staff (8 x 12 ft.; 1 or 2 persons): built-in double decker bed, dresser and mirror, locker or closet, toilet, shower, sink unit. • Parent education (5x7 ft.; 2 parents, 1 nurse): table, 3 chairs, crib. • Social service (6x8 ft.; 3 or 4 people): desk, 3 or 4 chairs, file. • Offices (two; 5x7 ft.; 1 or 2 persons per office): 1 for head nurse, 1 for resident physician, each with desk, 2 chairs, file. • Lounge-locker room (for nurses) : couch-bed, 2 soft chairs, mirror and sink, lockers (narrow) for 60 people. • Utility and prep room (6x8 ft.; 2 or 3 persons): refrigerator- freezer, prep bench, centrifuge, sink. 37Goff, Robert, M.D. 1978 "The Bedside Microcomputer in the Intensive Care Nursery". Interface Age 3: 65-67. GENERAL ABSTRACT: Software is being developed to enable pediatricians and neonatologists to maintain bedside microcomputers in the neonatal ICU, providing in- stant processing of, and access to, the voluminous laboratory data and event summaries generated by each infant. The data is stored in a problem-oriented format, and may be accessed with an inquiry to any particular problem. The program is being written in North Star extended disk BASIC and is implemented on a SOL/20 Terminal computer with 48k RAM, and North Star Micro disk drives. ANNOTATIONS; It is recoenized that the solution to the problem of information proc- essing in NICU development and operation is to utilize some form of computer processing and synthesis or both laboratory data and event description to daily input of data and, at the time of discharge, to abstract from the patient's file those pertinent items appropriate for inclusion in a discharge summary. Text Most of the infant's admission history (primarily prenatal and maternal) is encoded, and at the time of review decoded by the "History sub-routine", so that most of this textual material is confined to the program disk and does not require space on the patient's (program) disk. An additional feature of the output capability of the software is that it can print the forms which are required by many states for each infant who is transported from a referring hospital to an NICU center. Diagnosis Any diagnosis which can be made solely on the basis of laboratory data and encoded events or encoded history will automatically appear in the summary as discharge diagnosis. While the attending physician has the option of deleting any of these or adding other diagnoses to the list, it is anticipated that by far the majority of diagnoses will be accurately made by diagnostic algorithms, and will maximize future access for statistical study of patient care information. An additional feature of the diagnostic algorithms is that any suggestive (but not conclusive) diagnoses can be pointed out to the physician as possibilities which may warrant further clinical or laboratory investigation. 38Cost The system described, including a printer, should cost approximately $8,500 with all the necessary supplies and sales tax. Goodwin, James and Paul R. Swyer, M.D. 1973 Regional Services in Reproductive Medicine. The Report of the Joint Committee of the Society of Obstetricians and Gynecologists of Canada and the Canadian Pediatric Society on the Regionalization of Reproductive Care in Canada. Sherbrooke, Quebec. GENERAL ABSTRACT: This document presents a fundamentally comprehensive description of a regional approach to newborn care for Canada. Generally, its main purpose has been to document the need and justification for regional care, and to depict the requirements for its implementation. The authors have clearly defined the organizational parameters for which planning is needed. ANNOTATIONS: Mortality Statistics, Justification for Planning Several Canadian studies indicate that an organized system providing neonatal intensive care results in improved mortality statistics. The Quebec Mortality Study has shown lower mortality rates from obstetrical units using neonatal intensive care facilities compared to those which do not. Further, J.P. Lucey states that "In Vermont (1966-1969) the neonatal mortality rate (13.3%) for 637 low birth weight infants (1,500-2,500 grams) born in the Medical Center Hospital of Vermont was approximately one-half of that for the 1,449 infants born in hospitals without intensive care capabilities (25.7%)." High-Risk Births The authors offer the following list of patients who are deserving of the closest attention before, during and after labor: • Grand multipliers • Women aged 35 or over • Women giving a history of previous difficult delivery, caesarean section, myomectomy, hysterotomy, ante-partum or postpartum hemorrhage or manual removal of the placenta • A woman with coincidental major medical disease; diabetes mellitus, hypertension, chronic renal disease, heart disease or anemia • Women with severe pre-eclamptic toxemia or even mild toxemia super- imposed on pre-existing hypertension or renal disease 39• Women in excess of 200 pounds or whose pre-pregnancy weight was 30 pounds in excess of the recommended weight for her height • Women in labor with no prior antenatal care • Any multiple pregnancy • Any woman with an obviously large infant or hydramnios • Any malpresentation in or out of labor • Women with suspected choriamnionitis • Women in labor 24 hours or more • Multipara in labor with a fully dilated cervix and an unengaged presenting part • Women upon whom several unsuccessful attempts at vaginal deliveries have been made. Justification of Perinatal Intensive Care by Results The extensive experience of Priscilla White and Pederson attests to the fact that strict regulation of blood sugar, the avoidance of diabetic complications, toxemia anemia and infection, and the careful timing of pre- term delivery using serial urinary 24-hour estriol determinations can effect a significant reduction in both perinatal mortality and morbidity. The authors report that in a recent study of infants under intensive care 86.7% of 72 infants surviving a birth weight of less than 1,500 grams are apparently normal and only 7.4% definitely abnormal. Survivors of artificial ventilation have a normal distribution of I.Q. compared with controls. Another study shows that the majority of infants asphyxiated at birth have recovered undamaged using modern methods of resuscitation by I.P.P.V. and intravenous alkaline buffer. Further, the authors report that there has been a significant reduction in mortality from RDS by the use of artificial ventilation. And lower mortality rates are being reported in low birth weight infants following the use of intravenous alimentation. The Report of the Medical Officer of Health, city of Toronto, 1971 points out that the neonatal mortality rate for the city has fallen from 20 to 10.1 1,000 births between 1961, when special neonatal care facilities were first organized in 1971. Notes on Implementation of a Regional Plan and Administrative Arrangements It is suggested that planning committees should be established at State, regional, and community levels. A national liaison committee is possibly also necessary with strong backing and cooperation from the health departments at national and State levels. Policy execution would be the responsibility of Federal and State directors of health. Local administrators and planning officials at the appropriate levels of action would be responsible for advice and detailed direction. 40Delivery of optimal health care in the region would be facilitated by the appointment of one obstetrician and one neonatologist as regional directors charged with the responsibility of organizing services within the region. These individuals should have their base in the regional hospital center. Also, the regional director would be responsible for the proper collection of data relating to maternal and perinatal mortality and morbidity. They should also establish their own guidelines for the referral of high-risk pregnancies within their own region depending on the resources in personnel and facilities available, and the distance of peripheral centers from the regional center. Relations of Obstetric Units, Neonatal Units and University Health Centers Ideally, a neonatal intensive care unit should be closely integrated with an obstetrical unit, so that competent personnel are available to treat emergencies in the delivery room. The location of an NICU in a major pediatric center has many advantages since it can provide a wide range of medical and paramedical expertise. It will also usually be advantageous to associate the NICU with the pediatric department of a medical school. In order to justify the expense of maintaining the staff and equip- ment necessary for optimal perinatal care and to provide the staff with the opportunity to maintain expertise, the annual number of deliveries in a regional NICU would have to be large, about 4,000 to 6,000 per annum. If the maternal population is unselected for risk, problems will arise in only 8 to 19% of pregnancies and up to 10% of neonates of which 3% will be of major severity. The Ontario Perinatal Study (1967) showed that 32% of pregnancies had some broadly defined identifiable risk factor and generated 60% of the neonatal problems. Forty percent of the neonatal problems were unheralded and emergent, though modern techniques have somewhat reduced this pro- portion. Therefore, if only risk pregnancies were selected for delivery in major centers, a system would still be necessary to care for emergency problems in community hospitals. Regional Organization for Perinatal Care Regional Center for Reproductive Care: • Resource center for pregnancy and perinatal risk processing. • Staffed by specialist obstetricians and neonatologists. • Equipment for monitoring both mother and fetus during labor. • Neonatal resuscitation and location near delivery suites. • Available consultant specialists in pediatrics and surgery. Community Hospitals: • Close affiliation with the regional center. • Primary responsibility for delivery of women whose pregnancies appear normal. • Equipped and staffed to deal with emergencies in both mother and infant. • Able to call on consultants from regional centers. 41Out-Post Nursing Stations and Clinics: • Probably justifiable only where geographic features make access to larger centers difficult. • Delivery of infants in low-risk category. • Nursery prepared to care for low-risk infants only. Each hospital should provide both inpatient and outpatient services. The use of centralized computer based in the regional hospital center could provide a program for determining the antepartum risk score for all women within the region. Laboratory Service The regional hospital may provide centralized lab services for the region to carry out specialized tests for the community hospitals. Telephone consultations between a peripheral unit or referring physician and the regional center should be encouraged. Transport To ensure adequacy and suitability of space for housing and caring for patients in ambulances and aircraft used for infant transport re- gional planning should review the facilities in these vehicles, the appro- priateness of electrical current supplies for incubators and other life- support equipment, and specified qualifications of personnel who drive and operate transport vehicles. Courses in techniques of neonatal trans- port should be offered by the regional referral center. Notes on Personnel for Regional Organization For Canadian population, the authors have determined that for a birth rate of 20 per 1,000 population requires on OB specialist. If the family physician is delivering the bulk of normal patients, this figure might be adjusted to one specialist obstetrician/gynecologist per 25,000 to 30,000 population (500 to 600 deliveries annually). In order to remain competent, a family physician should deliver at least 50 infants per year. Nursing Requirements for "Normal" Patients in Labor and Delivery Units Aside from an experienced nursing supervisor in charge of the total unit, there should be one experienced registered nurse assigned as head nurse to the labor and delivery unit for each 8-hour shift. In addition, there should be a minimum of one graduate registered nurse attending every two laboring women. Staffing Requirement in Postpartum Units Assuming that the recently delivered mother is monitored in the delivery area for a period of at least one hour following delivery, the postpartum ward should be staffed with a minimum of one registered nurse per 10 patients per 8-hour shift. 42Nursing Staff Requirements for High-Risk OB Patients The authors report that it has been calculated that the ratio of one registered nurse per three antepartum high-risk patients per 8- hour shift was satisfactory coverage. During labor in which active moni- toring is being carried, it has been found that one graduate nurse is necessary for the laboring mother and one graduate nurse with some expertise in the use of fetal monitoring equipment is necessary for the unborn baby. Beds, Facilities and Equipment Regional Centers It is estimated that 3.6 beds are required for the antenatal super- vision of high-risk pregnancies for every 1,000 deliveries annually (a pilot study in McMaster University surrounding Hamilton, Ontario). The Perinatal Intensive Care Unit For every 1,000 annual risk deliveries in a University or equivalent center, 18 antepartum supervision beds is adequate. The authors continue to describe in some detail the essential equip- ment needed for the different levels of newborn care. Their descriptions include: P.I.C.U. equipment, fetal scalp blood sampling equipment, general labor and delivery unit guidelines, utility room standards, and standards for blood gas analysis facilities. Pregnancy Register The authors agree that it would be both feasible and desirable that a pregnancy register be instituted and maintained at the regional birth center. This would be initiated by the primary contact physician as soon as pregnancy was diagnosed. Computer-based forms would be used enabling rapid processing at the regional center which would initiate a dialogue with the attending physician aimed at predicting categories of risk to both mother and fetus within the pregnancy and offering advice on the correct management to minimize risks. Postnatal Risk Register In addition, a postnatal risk register could be developed for follow- up surveillance of infants with perinatal problems. Such pregnancy and postnatal risk registers would form the basis for continuing peer surveillance of performance in relationship to morbidity and mortality statistics. 43Cost Effectiveness of Optimal Reproductive Care The cost effectiveness of optimal perinatal and postnatal care com- pares favorably with other medical programs. Estimates of cost for antepartum and intrapartum supervision of high- risk pregnancies are difficult, but from pilot studies carried out at the Henderson General Hospital in Hamilton, St. Joseph's Hospital in London, and Women's College Hospital in Toronto (1970), the cost per patient per day has been estimated at $80-$190 in excess of the standard hospital per diem rate. Insofar as morbidity to the mother and her infant is avoided by optimal care, later costs of treatment and custodial care of a much larger order of magnitude will be avoided. Care in the NICU at the Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, costs approximately $200 per patient day. Since the average stay in the NICU is 6 days, the cost is roughly $1,200 per patient admitted. This figure excluded care in transitional and convalescent areas of the neonatal unit, which costs about $100 per patient day; the average stay in these areas is 20 days and the average cost is $2,000, so that the average total cost for a patient treated in the neonatal referral unit is $3,200. The authors stress the humanitarian aspect itself may justify the high operating cost of a perinatal unit, including an NICU. In addition, these costs must be balanced against the potential lifetime earning power, taxability, and value to the community of the individual preserved intact who might otherwise have died or required long-term custodial care in an institution. Total costs of supporting such a disabled individual have been estimated at $500,000 over a lifetime, according to E.J. Quilligan These methodologies have been suggested in order to determine bed need levels; • The number of maternity beds required has been calculated as follows estimated deliveries per year X the average length of stay in days X occupancy factor of 1.3 365 Days number of maternity beds. • Bassinets should be provided on the basis of well established principles for the majority df pregnancies which are of low risk. The formula is: estimated live births per year X average length of stay in days X occupancy factor (1.3 or 1.35) 365 Days number of bassinets. These bassinets will mostly be situated in community hospitals, district hospitals or exceptionally in nursing outpost units. 44• Expected Patient Load in a Regional Neonatal Referral Center and Bed Requirement On the basis of the experience of the Neonatal Division at the Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, and other data available on the incidence of neonatal disease, it is estimated 45 infants will require intensive care and 45 further intermediate care in the neonatal periods for every 1,000 live births. In round numbers, 15 of the 45 intensive care patients will die, leaving 75 in all for convalescence for every 1,000 live births. On the average an I.C. infant occupies the bed for 6 days and 1 bed accommodates 365/6 = 60 patients/yr. Hence, the bed requirement for 1,000 live births is 45/60 = 0.75 for I.C. On the average, intermediate/convalescent care beds are occupied for 20 days by each patient. Hence, 1 bed accommodates 365/20 = 18 patients in this category. There are 75 patients/1,000 live births requiring such beds. Thirty survivors from I.C. Forty-five survivors from intermediate care. Hence, beds required/1,000 live births is 75/18 = 4.2 *These figures are dependent upon the neonatal mortality rate. Gorwitz, Kurt and Donald Smith, M.D. "Some Implications of Declining Birth Rates for Pediatrics." Pediatrics 56: 592-597. GENERAL ABSTRACT: Currently, declining birth and fertility rates in the United States are having a significant impact upon both the absolute and relative size of the child population. The magnitude and extent of this impact are described, and implications for the practice of pediatrics are discussed. The timeliness of re-examining the role of the pediatrician in the delivery of health care services is emphasized. ANNOTATIONS: The article focusses on these questions of concern to planners: Are we building and maintaining an excessive number of pediatric beds? Are we approaching a point where the current shortage of pediatricians will be converted to a surplus? What is an appropriate ratio of pediatricians to children and adolescents? How many patients does a pediatrician see during the course of a year? 45Data support the assumption that the decrease in the number of live births has been primarily concentrated in certain high-risk groups. It has produced a drop in the number and proportion of low weight and low gestation babies. This, in turn, has reduced the probability of mortality during the first year of life and of chronic disabilities related to pregnancy or delivery. In recent years, about 8% of all infants weighed 2,500 grams or less at birth. However, these 8% have been responsible for about 85% of all deaths in the first four weeks of life and a majority of those dying in the next 11 months. Both of these rates of mortality are now at record low levels, due in part to the larger than average drop in the number of low weight babies. This drop has been pronounced among babies weighing 1,000 grams or less where virtually all die shortly after delivery and survivors commonly have chronic handicaps. The need for services and facilities that treat mental retardation, blindness, cerebral palsy and epilepsy can be expected to decline. The authors believe that the number of births and the birth rate will remain close to present levels for the remainder of the present decade and then will gradually decrease further to around 2.7 million by 1990. The authors say the number of pediatric beds in the nation is now estimated to be 90,000 or an average of 1 per 800 children and adolescents. Haasis, Patricia, R.N. and Jay P. Goldsmith, M.D. 1977 "The First Year's Experience of a Neonatal Intensive Care Unit". The Journal of the Louisiana State Medical Society 129: 247-251. GENERAL ABSTRACT: A statewide need exists in Louisiana for physician and nurse educa- tion in neonatal care and for public support of the modern concept of regional neonatal intensive care units. Newborn infants who require intensive care can be moved to a regional center without increased morbidity if a special two-way transport system is used. Infants weighing less than 1,500 grams can survive without permanent physical or neonatal sequelae with neonatal care. Primary care at the community hospital level needs to concentrate on improving basic infant needs, such as control of body temperature and of blood-glucose levels. Based on models in other states, a voluntary regionalized program of NICUs can work in Louisiana. ANNOTATIONS: During the first year, the unit at Alton Ochsner Medical Founda- tion in New Orleans, Louisiana (1976), admitted 318 patients, 160 of 46whom required ventilatory assistance. From July, 1976 to July, 1977, there were 620 inborn deliveries at Ochsner. Fifty-six of these infants required intensive care. The survival rate of these in- borns reflects the small number of patients in each weight category. Of the total inborn and referred admitted, there were 54 deaths with an overall survival rate of 83%. Of the 64 patients who weighed 1,500 grams or less, 60% survived. These infants with proper transport and neonatal intensive care can and do live without permanent physical or mental sequelae, and community hospitals need not relinquish these infants as nonviable. Hawes, Warren E., M.D., M.P.H. 1975 "A Survey of Newborn Intensive Care in California". The Western Journal of Medicine 23. GENERAL ABSTRACT: There are over 450 newborn intensive care beds available in California hospitals. Over 400 of these are in tertiary units providing total care for sick newborns. At the present time, there is an NTCU bed short- age in some areas of the State, the units running at an occupancy rate of over 87%. The bed situation is particularly critical in the East Bay and San Diego. The survey suggests that from 2 to 9% of newborns need intensive care. The present bed availability is ample for the lower figure but insufficient to meet the upper one. ANNOTATIONS: The cost of newborn intensive care is high', daily rates averaged $198 per day and $123 per day for intermediate care, total costs averaging $5,178 per day. The total cost of NICU care in the 20 units is in excess of $35 million annually. Respiratory distress syndrome was the reason for NICU admission in more than 40% of the cases. Congenital anomalies and sepsis were next, accounting for approximately 20% of the admissions. The recovery rate in these units is very high, averaging 84.4% for inborn babies and 73.5% for transferred babies. 47Hein, Herman A., M.D. 1977 "Regionalization of Perinatal Care in Rural Areas Based on the Iowa Experience". Seminars in Perinatology: Regionalization of Perinatal Care 1: 241-254. Guest Editor: Leo Stern, M.D. New York: Grune and Stratton. GENERAL ABSTRACT: This article discusses the process and issues in planning a regionalized perinatal center in Iowa. ANNOTATIONS: Organizational Elements of Planning During the initial stages of planning, discussions ensued between practicing pediatricians and pediatric faculty members of the College of Medicine at the University of Iowa who were concerned about infant mortality rates and need to improve neonatal care. The initial plan did not include obstetrical care, but as the program took shape the obstetricians became interested. Although the joint planning was difficult and took additional time, it was justified because it resulted in a truly perinatal program. A perinatal educational team was hired and based at the University. The initial team members included two nurses and a pediatrician who served as the director. The nurses came from clinical backgrounds of high- risk obstetrics and neonatal intensive care. The direct background included experience in the private practice of pediatrics and a special interest in neonatal intensive care. An obstetric consultant was avail- able for counsel and advice. Three basic objectives were formulated to guide the program: (1) Routine perinatal care should be improved in community hospitals (Level I); (2) Level II care must be developed and maintained; and (3) Tertiary care centers must develop close ties with Level II hospitals to maintain the quality of care in those centers. Realizing that proximate Level II or Level III care was improbable for some period of time, the team felt that the greatest impact of the perinatal program would be in the improvement of routine perinatal services in community hospitals. To achieve this goal, the team determined that it would create a hospital visitation program. All parties were in agreement that the team should visit the hospitals as professional helpers and not as judges or regulators. The idea was to assist each hospital to provide perinatal care to the advantage of the patient, with the expectation that the unit could provide the quality care needed and, therefore, continue to provide such services. 48Training the Team Prior to each hospital visit, the personnel working in the hospital were informed that a short educational program would be given immediately following the assessment. They were told that the program would be concerned with contemporary obstetric and neonatal care practices and would discuss the items that were included in the teams' assessment instrument. Since this program was to be given the same day of the visit, it was necessary for the team members to be prepared to discuss a number of perinatal topics. To do this, the team developed a list of anticipated problems and a short presentation on each. They practiced these pre- sentations with each other to develop clarity and simplicity. The training period lasted approximately four weeks. Central Office and Staff The central office of the Perinatal Care Program is located in Iowa City at University Hospital and serves as a focal point for the State's perinatal activities. While it is important that many individuals and groups become involved in the cause of improvement of perinatal care, there must be a unifying thread that runs throughout the program and coordinates the total effort. The central perinatal staff has served that purpose in Iowa. The author suggests other rural areas, desirous of regionalizing perinatal regionalization, consider hiring full-time professionals to guide their program. Positive Results Data indicates that care practices have improved in Level I hospitals. Furthermore, analysis of perinatal data indicates that the trend toward lower perinatal mortality rates noted in Iowa and nationally has been more pronounced in Iowa since the onset of the Perinatal Care Program in 1973. The decline in neonatal death rate has been more pronounced than the corresponding fetal death rate. Hobel, Calvin J., M.D., Marcia A. Hyvarinen, M.D., Donald M. Okada, M.D. and William Oh, M.D. 1973 "Perinatal and Intrapartum High-Risk Screening: Prediction of the High- Risk Neonate". American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 117: 1-9. GENERAL ABSTRACT: A high-risk pregnancy screening system based on a prospective analvsis of prenatal, intrapartum, and neonatal factors in 738 pregnancies was found to predict perinatal morbidity and mortality. 49ANNOTATIONS: Factors were assigned with weighted values according to their assumed risk. Total scores of the prenatal, intrapartum, and neonatal period were dichotomized to simplify the scoring system by forming a low-risk groups (scores less than 10) and a high-risk group (scores greater than or equal to 10). Three hundred and forty patients (46%) were low risk during both the prenatal and intrapartum period (low/low-risk group). In this group, the incidence of high-risk neonates and the perinatal mortality rate was extremely low. There was no significant increase in neonatal morbidity or perinatal mortality in 135 patients (18%) who were identified as high risk during the intrapartum period (high/low-risk group). However, in 144 patients (20%) at risk only during the intrapartum period (low/high-risk group) or in 119 patients (high/ high risk) there was a significant increase in the number of high-risk neonates and perinatal mortality. By a stepwise multiple regression analysis, actual intrapartum scores are most predictive of neonatal risk (days in hospital) followed by actual prenatal scores. Identifying a popu- lation as to their risk status for both the prenatal and intrapartum period has added depth to the understanding of the continuum of risk which exists within the framework of the perinatal period. *It is noted that in North America, Nesbitt and Aubry (Nesbitt, R.E.L., Jr, and Aubry, R.H.: American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 103: 972, 1969, and Goodwin, Dunne, and B.W. Thomas: Canadian Medical Association Journal. Vol. 101, 1969) have developed methods of identifying high-risk pregnancies; however, they have either limited their evaluation to the period prior to labor or have neglected to evaluate the neonatal period in regard to morbidity. Honeyfield, Peter R. 1976 "Evaluation, Mortality and Morbidity Indices and Compliance in the Care of the High-Risk Newborn Infant". Denver, CO: Department of Pediatrics, University of Colorado. GENERAL ABSTRACT: This article discusses data requirements for perinatal care systems. ANNOTATIONS: The following are indicators of mortality and should be collected in a standard form: 50• Number of live births. • Number of fetal deaths (early, immediate, late). • Number of neonatal deaths. • Birth weight. • Gestational age (accurate to within two weeks). • Age at death. • Number of infants transferred to another facility. These should be collected at each newborn facility and gathered at the four regional Level III centers. Inter-Hospital Care The agency responsible for this activity (usually the referral center) is charged with data collection relating to: • Number of infants transferred. • Hospital of origin. • Hospital of destination (Level II or III). Referral Center Data should include: • Birth weight (broken down by gestation age). • Neonatal Death Rate (broken down by age at death). • Perinatal death rate. Transfer rates (per 100) should be compared with mortality rates (pre- dicted and actual) for both hospitals and regions. Low transfer rates and high mortality suggest a hospital which may have problems in identifica- tion of high-risk infants, early supportive care or poor compliance with the concept of regionalization. High transfer rates (in excess of 5%) may suggest inability to provide minimum supportive care appropriate to a Level I unit or indicate a high-risk population. The latter can be determined by assessing the predicted mortality. Inter-hospital care of sick newborns is an integral part of regionaliza- tion of health care services. It would be desirable for all inter-hospital transfer activity to be reported to the State Health Department for collation and evaluation of data. Johnson, Dorothy K., Dr.P.H. and Elizabeth A. Hefferin, Dr.P.H. 1977 "Perinatal Outcomes Among High-Risk Patients in Two Prenatal Care Programs". Inquiry 14: 293-302. GENERAL ABSTRACT: The paper describes a retrospective study designed to compare peri- natal outcomes among two groups of high-risk women. One received perinatal care from a Maternal and Infant Care program (483 subjects); the other from a traditional health department prenatal program (419 subjects). Both groups were from Los Angeles. 51ANNOTATIONS: When perinatal outcomes for the two groups were compared, no signifi- cant differences were observed in the number of infants surviving to 28 days, low or high birth weight, asphyxia status or other respiratory problems, metabolic or infection problems, birth trauma, physical or mental defects or Apgar scores at one and five minutes postpartum. Cost per delivery determinations were unsuccessful. The authors conclude that their findings do not support the efficacy of the special Maternal and Infant Care program studied over regular traditional programs, but note findings cannot be generalized. They suggest that there is high probability that Maternal and Infant Care programs may have great impact where the mortality statistics pre- viously have been high, where general medical care has been only minimally available, and where many patients in the past have sought no prenatal care. Where these programs have been implemented in districts with high previous mortality, investigators have been able to present quite well- grounded evidence to document the reduction in poor perinatal outcomes. This suggests that comprehensive MIC service programs will probably prove most fruitful if established in poverty areas where poor perinatal outcome rates are high, as compared with those in adjoining areas. Johnson, John D., Natalie C. Malachowski, Rose Grobstein, Doris Welsh, William J.R. Daily, and Philip Sunshine 1974 "Prognosis of Children Surviving with the Aid of Mechanical Ventilation in the Newborn Period". Fetal and Neonatal Medicine 84: 272-276. GENERAL ABSTRACT: This study attempted to partially answer whether infants with severe respiratory failure who survive with the aid of assisted ventilation have a reasonable long-term prognosis. ANNOTATIONS: Fifty-five infants who survived respifatory failure in the neonatal period with the aid of assisted ventilation were studied. Over 80% of these infants had normal intelligence and either minimal or no neurologic abnormalities. Only four infants had I.Q. scores of less than 85. The incidence of neurologic and intellectual handicaps was highest in low birth weight infants (-<1500 grams) . As experience with the use of mechanical ventilation has been refined, the prognosis of surviving infants has also improved. Those infants who survived beyond 7 months of age with broncho- pulmonary dysplasia had no cariopulmonary disability when they reached 5 or 6 years of age. 52Jonsen, A.R., Ph.D., R.H. Phibbs, M.D., W.H. Tooley, M.D. and M.J. Garland, Ph.D. 1975 "Critical Issues in Newborn Intensive Care: A Conference Report and Policy Proposal". Pediatrics 55: 756-768. GENERAL ABSTRACT: The article presents several cases and certain key clinical-ethical questions associated with the provision of neonatal intensive care. Summaries of five papers on major considerations affecting these issues are included. The authors propose a moral policy stating areas of responsibility and ethical guidelines for decisions about care of newborn infants. ANNOTATIONS: The following general recommendations concern allocation of medical resources, priorities between preventive and curative medicine, and between medical care and other forms of care affecting neonatal intensive care regionalization plans: • Research in neonatology should be coordinated at the national level in the interests of efficiency and caution. • Neonatal intensive care should be organized on a regional basis so that its quality and access are relatively equal among various communities, so that continuing information and technologies can be shared, and so that adequate epidemiological data can be gathered and compared. • On the basis of clinical experience, professionals in neonatal intensive care should refine those clinical criteria which render more specific the general conditions for prolonged life without pain and the potential for human communication. These criteria should be communicated broadly within the pediatric, obstetric and mental health community. • Resuscitation criteria should be established with full awareness of the economic and medical implications of providing this care. Estimates should be made of the financial cost to society of prolonging life at a humane level, depending upon the condition at birth. • Delivery room policy, based on certain criteria, should state conditions for which resuscitation is not indicated. This policy should be made known to health professionals and to parents who may be at particular risk (possibly to all parents). 53• Parents at risk should be counseled about the possibilities of risks. While recognizing that parents often will be unable or unwilling to make decisions, medical professionals must always accept, in principle, that the responsibility should be borne by the parents and attempt to facilitate but not force them to make the decision. • Regional neonatal intensive care units should establish an advisory board consisting of health professionals and other involved and interested persons. The board would discuss the problems of the unit and make a periodic retrospective review of the difficult decisions. They would assess the criteria for diagnosis and prognosis in terms of medical validity and social acceptability. To implement such a procedure, a neonatal intensive care unit could review its experience prospectively for each case in which a decision had to be made. All data pertinent to the decision could be recorded in a case summary, which would be reviewed monthly, describe the current process of ethical decision- making in the unit, and provide a basis for any changes which might be planned. • Since some infants may be abandoned by their parents or, because of their condition, be maintained in an institution, neonatology must concern itself with the adequacy of such institutions. The advocates for intensive care must become the advocates for the development of humane care and for sufficient funding of programs to support families whose children require special attention at home or in institutions. Neonatology cannot be developed in isolation from continuing specialized care which, unfortunately, will be needed by some of the survivors of life- threatening neonatal disorders. Jonsen, Albert R., Ph.D and George Lister 1978 "Newborn Intensive Care: The Ethical Problems". Hastings Center Report. GENERAL ABSTRACT: Over the past ten to fifteen years, a considerable body of data has been developed to guide scientific and technical advances in the medical treatment of seriously ill newborn infants. A neonatal intensive care unit brings together sophisticated equipment and specially trained personnel to provide the optimal environment for assisting the endangered infant through a critical stage in the transition to extrauterine life. A list of the ethical problems in perinatology includes: termination of care, research on the fetus, randomization and controls in clinical trials with 54unconsenting subjects, use of genetic information, risks to fetus and mother in prenatal diagnosis and the consequences of such diagnosis, resuscitation and preservation of severely damaged infants, etc. The best estimates currently available suggest that at least 60 of every 1,000 live born infants will need some form of neonatal intensive care if death and disability are to be minimized. ANNOTATIONS: Iatrogenicity "Iatrogenic disease" is commonly referred to as an abnormal condition induced in a patient by the effects of treatment by a doctor. However, the term does not necessarily impute blame. Also, the term can mean "disease of medical progress... that would not have occurred if sound therapeutic procedure had not been employed". As a medical problem, iatrogenicity is irritating, but it entails a particularly frustrating moral problem. This moral problem centers on the question, "What should I do?" One common response to the moral question is to exhort the physician to proceed with care, initiating treatment cautiously and meticulously analyzing success and failure. To proceed with care, implies the establishment of safety and efficacy through laboratory and clinical research. Experimental Enigma No doubt, the fetus usually remains sheltered from the grasp of data- collecting devices. Biological and medical restrictions frequently discourage careful clinical investigation, particularly in the case of new drugs, many of which are used despite warning of insufficient studies in infants and children. The iatrogenic dangers of perinatal medicine suggest that the perinatologist bears a heavy moral responsibility to move experimentally in order to establish the safety and efficacy of perinatal care. Having accepted this moral responsibility, the peri- natologist finds that experimentation is, itself, an ethical enigma. Prognostic Perplexity The question of principle which must be joined to the foresight of prognosis is "What sort of human being is desirable?" Unless it is answered, prognosis is futile. Yet, the art of prognosis, which has been overlaid with a great deal of science, still is largely a function of clinical experience. In addition, neonatal medicine is complicated by lack of experience with the class of patients. 55Kanto, William P., Jr., M.D. and Alex F. Robertson, III, M.D. 1977 "One Year's Experience of a Regional Neonatal Intensive Care Unit". Journal of the Medical Association of Georgia 66: 616-623. GENERAL ABSTRACT: Preliminary evidence suggests that regional neonatal intensive care units in Georgia have been successful in reducing the State's neonatal mortality. A major reason for the reduction in neonatal mortality has been the decrease in the mortality rate of low birth weight infants, associated with the improved care available in intensive care centers. Since every hospital does not have the capability of developing these complex care facilities, regional programs have been developed to extend the service to every hospital. This report reviews the experience of the NICU Center at Augusta, Georgia, during a single year of operation. ANNOTATIONS: There were 464 admissions in the NICU of Talmadge Hospital during 1975 and 326 (70%) of the neonates survived. In-born admissions were 130 (28% of total admissions) neonates of whom 93 (72%) survived. Out- born admissions totaled 334 (72% of total admissions) and 223 (70%) survived. The out-born admissions were delivered in 51 community hospitals in Georgia and South Carolina prior to transfer to the NICU. As has been reported throughout the literature, the survival rate of all infants increased as birth weight increased. Of the infants below 1,001 grams, 54% of the out-born infants survived, compared to only 29% of the in-born infants. The survival of 47% of all admissions with birth weights less than 1,001 grams is better than recent reports and would suggest that continued aggressive treatment is justified. Of infants weighing 1,501-2,000 grams, 83% of the in-born infants survived, compared to 63% of the out-born infants. There is a high incidence of the Respiratory Distress Syndrome within this birth weight group and evidence is accumulating that the provision of intensive respiratory support early in the infant's course may reduce the mortality associated with this disorder. Of the infants weighing over 2,500 grams, 90% of the in-born infants survived compared to 79% of the out-born infants. This probably reflects the increased severity of disease in the transplanted group which re- quired their transfer. This report presents tables of the most common diagnosis and procedures. In 1970 the neonatal death rate in Georgia was 15.5 deaths per 1,000 live births. In 1975 this rate was 12.4, a decrease of 20%. Further improvement should occur with complete development of this program into a statewide system. 56Knuppel, Robert A., M.D., Curtis L. Centrulo, M.D., Charles J. Ingardia, M.D Kenneth A. Kappy, M.D., Joseph L. Kennedy, M.D., Marguerite J. Herschel, M.D Gretchen Aumann, R.N., Marian Lake, R.N. and Anthony J. Sharra, Ph.D. 1979 "Experience of a Massachusetts Perinatal Center". New England Journal of Medicine 300: 560-562. GENERAL ABSTRACT: The authors discuss the experience of the St. Margaret's Hospital for Women, the major obstetric affiliate of Tufts University School of Medicine and a Level III Perinatal Center. This article presents data on 200 maternal transfers treated between 1976-1978. Some findings of a study of Massachusetts' regionalization of maternal services conducted by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists are also discussed. ANNOTATIONS: The Perinatal Center has a service area which generates 15,000- 20,000 annual deliveries. St. Margaret's accounts for approximately 2,950 deliveries and 1,000 patients in its intensive care nursery. The neonatology service has a 25 bed intensive care unit. Referring physicians have three options in the belief that a closed medical staff discourages free use of a regional system: coming to the hospital with the high-risk mother and performing the delivery, have the patient managed by the perinatal staff but perform the delivery themselves, or have the staff assume total care. Findings from a retrospective study of 200 high-risk maternal transfers (176 resulting in delivery of 186 infants) include: • Ninety-eight percent of transfers arrived by ambulance; the number ranged between 2 and 6 per month. Predominating diagnoses were related to premature labor. Mean gestational age was 31.4 weeks. The average length of maternal stay was 11.2 days. • The overall uncorrected perinatal mortality rate was 11.8%, 37% for newborns weighing 1,500 grams or less and 2% for those weighing more than 1,500 grams. There were 21 neonatal deaths and 1 stillbirth, but no intrapartum deaths. When correction of perinatal deaths for congenital anomalies and irrevocable fetal hypoxia or admission was made, no deaths occurred. • The average length of stay for 186 infants was 19.8 days. • The following findings from an American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists' study of Massachusetts' regionalization of maternity services were cited: 57•• Twenty-four percent of responding obstetricians has experienced the closing of one hospital where they had staff privileges. •• Fifty-eight percent of all respondents believed access to Level II or Level III hospitals was improved. •• Sixty-nine percent of those involved in unit closures ex- perienced improved access to Level II or III hospitals. •• Sixty-two percent of respondents believe better coordination between hospitals has resulted. •• The majority of respondents perceived regional planning would improve perinatal mortality. Koops, Beverly L., M.D., John T. McCarthy, M.D. and L. Joseph Butterfield, M.D. 1978 "Who Pays the Bill for Neonatal Intensive Care?: Part III: Outcome" (mimeo). Reprints: L. Joseph Butterfield, M.D., The Children's Hospital, Department of Perinatology, 1056 East Nineteenth Ave., Denver, CO 80218. GENERAL ABSTRACT: This study reviews the relationship of hospital charges to medical outcome for 174 patients of The Children's Hospital Newborn Intensive Care Center during four months of 1976. The mean hospital charge, charge per day and length of stay for the patients were related to the factors of birth weight, gestational age, major medical diagnosis, and mortality outcome. The relationship of charges to long-term morbidity was discussed. Findings for neonatal intensive care outcome compared favorably to the charges as well as to mortality and morbidity outcomes which have been reported for adult intensive care. Implications for maternal-fetal transport, upgrading of perinatal care in all centers throughout a service region, and establisnment of long-term foilow-up programs are addressed. ANNOTATIONS: Hospital charges were, in general, well correlated with birth weight gestational age and number of hospital days. Infants weighing less than 1,000 grams were 28 weeks gestation and stayed 2 1/2 months; infants weighing 1,000 to 1,500 grams were 30 weeks gestation and stayed 1 2/3 months; infants between 1,500-2,000 grams were 34 weeks and stayed 1 month; infants between 2,000-2,500 grams were 36 weeks gestation and stayed 3 weeks; infants between 3,000-3,500 grams were 40 weeks and stayed 2 weeks. For survivors, the mean hospital charge was $340 per day. The authors noted that this reflected the first few days of very high cost during which a nurse-to-infant care ratio of 1:1 or 1:2 was required along with the high cost of ancillary procedures, as compared to 58recovery days with a nurse-to-infant care ratio of 1:4 and fewer daily tests and services. The high per diem cost of non-survivors, $607, reflects the early, very intensive care days without the averaging effect of the days of recovery. Eighty-four (50%) of the patients were admitted with the major diagnosis of hyaline membrane disease. Their charges were correlated with birth weight/gestational age categories, and reflected both the acute illness and the length of time to reach 38-40 weeks gestation. Those infants with extremely high charges which were skewed considerably above the mean had the complications leading to bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) Since BPD is most likely to occur in the extremely immature baby and is associated with high risk obstetrical problems, maternal transport to a tertiary care center for prevention of delivery or optimum delivery conditions is supported by the financial data. For patients with the primary diagnosis of birth defect, the charges reflected prolonged hospitalizations. Often these defects were complex and not remediable with current medical or surgical therapeutic modalities The long hospitalizations were associated with frustration of the health care professionals and ineffective management. Specifically, major bills were accrued by infants with birth defects involving the central nervous system or multiple organs, or who had difficult courses. Amongst the latter group were those infants who were also premature. The data indicated that 14 (8%) of the admissions had bills which were greater than three to six times the mean charge, and were responsible for 35% of the total hospital charges generated during this four-month period. All had a bad outcome. An additional 10 (6%) of the patients had bills which were two to three times the mean charge and 40% of these had a bad outcome. The diagnoses of these patients were birth defects, extreme immaturity and complicated hyaline membrane disease. Studies have shown that 20-30% of infants with birth weights of less than 1,500 grams have serious, permanent handicaps. These include blindness, hemiparesis, spastic quadriplagia and mental retardation. It has been suggested that poor long-term outcome may be predicted in low birth weight infants who have three or more complications, prolonged or problematic ventilation therapy and/or intraventricular hemorrhage with progressive hydrocephalus. The outcome of neonatal intensive care may also be evaluated by comparing it to the outcome of adult intensive care. The authors found a favorable comparison for survival rates, hospital charges, use of blood products and long-term morbidity. Factors to be included in cost/ benefit ratios are discussed. 59Leake, Rosemary, M.D., Alexandra Loew and William Oh, M.D. 1976 "Retransfer of Convalescent Intensive Care to Community Intermediate Care Nurseries". Clinical Pediatrics 15: 293-294. GENERAL ABSTRACT: As neonatal transport systems develop and the concept of regionaliza- tion of infant care becomes established, it is increasingly important that neonatal intensive care units be reserved for sick infants. Less ill ones can be transferred back to the community hospital nurseries once they have recovered from the initial acute episode which required inten- sive care. Several advantages can be derived from the practice: (1) parental visits can be more frequent, establishing a sounder infant- parent relationship in a less threatening environment; (2) the expense is less; (3) referral of such previously ill infants back to their community hospitals fosters better relationships between institutions; and (4) in the intensive care unit, the specialized attention can be con- centrated on very sick infants. The purpose of this study was to investi- gate the safety and practicality of such a transfer system by instituting a prospective evaluation of the outcome of convalescent newborn infants in two especially selected referring hospitals. ANNOTATIONS: From July, 1972 to June, 1974, 43 infants were transferred from the neonatal intensive care unit at Harbor General Hospital to intermediate care units at two referring hospitals for convalescent care. These hospitals had obtained a variance of the California Public Health Law allowing the transfer of infants back into their nurseries and cohorting with inborn infants. The convalescent infants were transferred when the following criteria were met: (1) the infant was free of clinical evidence of infection, (2) the infant had a stool culture free of pathogens, (3) the infant had been kept in less than 25% oxygen with satisfactory blood gas levels for at least 24 hours, (4) the infant was tolerating oral feedings by nipple or by gavage to maintain caloric and nutritional requirements, and (5) infants weighing less than 1,200 grams had no heart murmur at the time of transfer. From observations of 43 convalescent newborn infants, it is concluded with confidence that transfer of convalescent infants from a neonatal intensive care unit to community intermediate care nursery is feasible and desirable for efficient distribution of health care in the neonatal period. 60Mazzi, Eduardo, M.D., Ronald Gutberlet, M.D. and Jack A. Phillips, 1977 "The Maryland State Intensive Care Neonatal Program, Transport System". Maryland State Medical Journal 26: 86-87. GENERAL ABSTRACT: Concurrent with the regionalization of neonatal intensive care has evolved the development of transport systems for optimal and rapid evacuation of the sick infant from regional hospitals to specialized neonatal centers. Each State has created its own appropriate and practical transport system to improve neonatal mortality, and in the long range, morbidity. A key in the development of the MSICNP has been the coordination and cooperation by the Police Aviation Division of the State of Maryland. The majority of the infants transported to Regional Centers have been accomplished successfully and with minimum mortality by police heli- copters and their trained crews. ANNOTATIONS: Crew and Equipment Each helicopter has a crew consisting of a Maryland State Police pilot and an EMT-certified Maryland State Police observer/medic, whose duties are to coordinate the missions of the helicopter and, more importantly, care for the patient once the evacuation has been initiated. Each helicopter is equipped with basic first aid supplies, oxygen bottle, suction, cardiac monitor beeper, oxygen analyzer, thermometer and intra- venous infusion pump. In addition, each of the helicopters is equipped with a State Police FM and Emergency Medical Systems Radio, whereby they are able to converse while airborne with the State Emergency Communication System, doctors at referral centers, and ground ambulance units. Locations and Flight Request A 30-mile radius from an operational base is the primary response zone for each helicopter. A total of seven helicopters are eventually planned to give the entire State this type of complete coverage. Helicopters are dispatched according to their need and top priority is given to life-saving missions. The aircraft transports premature and sick neonates from outlying hospitals to the Baltimore City Regional ICUs. Flight Restrictions The flight minimum standards established for the helicopters are guided by FAA regulations and are based on visual flight rules. 61Landing Area Ground personnel, whether policemen or firemen, who have radio contact with the helicopter must advise the crew of the most desirable landing zone. For neonatal transport, landing areas have been set up according to aviation regulations in all participating hospitals. Ground personnel must check the entire landing zone for obstructions or obstacles such as trees, poles, ditches, signs, wires, etc. and advise the helicopter crew of these obstacles prior to landing. Crew Training The helicopter is manned by a two-man crew. One is a FAA-Licensed Rotary Wing Pilot and the other and EMT-A Medic/Observer. The Medic/Observer obtains the following training: • Eighty hours of Basic Emergency Medical Training Course. • Eighty hours of training at the Maryland Institute for Emergency Medicine. • Two days annually at Baltimore City Hospital and University of Maryland Hospital Neonatal Intensive Care Unit. They are instructed in the importance of temperature and oxygen control, perform neonatal resuscitation with bag and mask, conduct assisted ventilation and are trained in suctioning and taking vital signs. • Yearly retraining in all related emergency care treatment. The Medic's duties are to provide the necessary life-supporting treatment that sustain or prolongs the patients' ability to survive, and survive intact until he/she arrives at a suitable treatment center. Neonatal Transport Evaluation (One Year) In the 12-month period from March, 1975-March, 1976, 341 infants were transferred from 30 different regional hospitals to Baltimore Neonatal Center. Most of them (71.6%) were accomplished successfully by air, with two neonatal deaths during transport. These infants both were under 1,000 grams and critically ill. About 60% of the air evacuations of sick neonates have been accomplished without a physician. The mean arrival time from the time of initial call to the neonatal center has been 1 1/2 hours. The average flying time from different regional hospitals to Baltimore neonatal centers ranges from 2-57 minutes. The most common reason for referral was prematurity and respiratory distress syndrome, accounting for 52% of the total number of sick infants transplanted to Baltimore Neonatal Center. 62McCarthy, John T., M.D., Beverly L. Koops, M.D., Peter R. Honeyfield, M.D. and L. Joseph Butterfield, M.D. 1978 "Who Pays the Bill for Neonatal Intensive Care. Part I: Transport" (mimeo). Reprints: L. Joseph Butterfield, M.D., The Children's Hospital, Department of Perinatology, 1056 East Nineteenth Ave., Denver, CO 80218. GENERAL ABSTRACT: This study examined the characteristics of infants transported by the Newborn Emergency Service of The Children's Hospital. The service area covers ten states (500,000 square miles). The study group consisted of all infants who were transported by the Newborn Emergency Service to The Children's Hospital for four months during 1976. The report is a brief treatment of the experience of a neonatal trans- port system. It describes service area, care provided, patient and family characteristics and transport charges for services. ANNOTATIONS: The mean (N=174) transport charge for all infants was $539, the median charge was $318, and the mode charge was $180. For the whole group, trans- port charges represented 5.2% of the total hospital bill. The charge for transport was directly related to the distance between the hospital of referral and the tertiary care center. At this time, families must bear transportation charges as insurance does not include this as a benefit. The data suggest that further planning for Level II and III centers in rural areas may need to consider the cost effectiveness ratio of transport charges as well as duplication and feasibility of services in distant and/or isolated communities. McCarthy, John T. M.D., Beverly L. Koops, M.D. and L. Joseph Butterfield, M.D. 1978 "Who Pays the Bill for Neonatal Intensive Care: Part II: Hospitalization" (mimeo). Reprints: L. Joseph Butterfield, M.D., The Children's Hospital, Department of Perinatology, 1056 East Nineteenth Ave., Denver, CO 80218. GENERAL ABSTRACT: This report examines hospital charges excluding physician fee and source of payment for neonatal intensive care for a group of 174 admissions to The Children's Hospital during four months in 1976. The study used patient financial accounts as the data source. Each patient's account 63was tracked for 22 months after discharge or until the hospital bill was paid in full. Accounts paid in full were analyzed to determine total hospital charges, type of third-party payors, amount of the bill paid by the family and/or a third party and the amoung written off by the hospital. Accounts where closure was still pending were projected to when the bill would be paid in full. The implications for cooperation between private and public institu- tions, the importance of counseling families early in the hospital course of their neonates, and the need for financial planning by the referring and tertiary care centers are discussed. ANNOTATIONS: Eighty-five percent of bills were paid to some degree by third- party payors, 4% by families and 11% were uncollectable. Fifteen percent of the bills were not paid in full by 22 months after the last discharge in the study group. The mean hospital charge (excluding physician's services) was $10,513. The range was between $541 and $66,652. Seventy- three percent of the infants had bills of less than $10,000. The amount paid by the third-party payor was dependent on the type of insurance coverage. For example, Kaiser, a pre-paid insurance plan, covered 100% of the hospital bill including the transport charge. In contrast, Medicaid paid for slightly more than 50% of the total hospital bill and a small amount of the transport charge. Blue Cross covered nearly all of the hospital bill but none of the transport charges. Of the 174 infants transported during the study period, 28.7% accounts involved a write off. There was a correlation between the type of insurance coverage a family had and the amount absorbed or written off by the hospital. Infants covered by Medicaid (15%) were responsible for a disproportionate (51%) amount of write-offs. Meyer, Belton 1974 "Transport of High-Risk Infants in Arizona". Regionalization of Perinatal Care. Report of the Sixty-Sixth Ross Conference on Pediatric Care. Edited by Philip Sunshine, M.D. Columbus, Ohio: Ross Laboratories. GENERAL ABSTRACT: This document suggests standards for pre-hospital and intensive care management for newborn patients and pregnant women. 64ANNOTATIONS: Perinatal Care Delivery • In office or clinic, the obstetric team should identify early any factors that are threats to fetal health; approximately 60% of all fetuses destined to be sick neonates can be identified. • A record system should be used that is designed to systematize the collection, screening, transmission, and analysis of pregnancy data throughout all its phases, from office through hospital discharge of mother and infant. • The neonatal care team must have full knowledge of the obstetric data and appreciate its significance. • Prenatal records should be forwarded at 36 weeks from office to hospital in routine pregnancies and subsequently updated. • High-risk pregnancy lists should be developed and protocols established for arrangement of care at the appropriate level of facility and for involvement of appropriate consultants. • Protocols should be established for response to specific fetal distress indicators and for use of fetal diagnostic procedures in chronic intrauterine distress, for elective delivery and for conduct of artificial induction. Resuscitation • A protocol should be established by the medical director in con- sultation with the regional intensive care center for appropriate management of neonatal asphyxia, acidosis and shock. • Equipment should be pre-arranged in each delivery room or in a special resuscitation area providing an adequate treatment space and adequate warmth, usually by means of a radiant heater. • Each infant at birth should be characterized through a brief general examination and the Apgar scoring system at one and five minutes and serially at five-minute intervals thereafter for infants with continuing distress. Transitional Nursery A protocol should be established for nursing examination of the infant upon admission to the nursery: (1) the infant should be weighed 65and the infant's weight and gestational age plotted on an intrauterine growth chart to detect the large and small for dates, and the low birth weight due to immaturity; and (2) A protocol should be established for continuing evaluation of these infants providing for serial determinations of blood sugar and for initiation of early glucose feedings of intravenous infusion of glucose as appropriate. Intensive Care Centers In various regions, it will be appropriate to develop a cooperative relationship between various Level III Centers for particular areas of special care. Transport The referring center should prepare appropriate documents and needed materials to accompany the patient during the transport. These include copies of maternal and infant records, maternal and cord blood specimens, laboratory results, bacteriologic studies and x-rays. The family should be give opportunity to examine and hold or touch their infant prior to transport and to meet the personnel from the Intensive Care Center. Evaluation In the regional system, all levels of care should participate in developing mechanisms for reporting and analyzing results to assess function in the regional system. A major function of the record system chosen for recording and transmitting patient care information is to pro- vide a sequential analysis of patient care information which is compatible with standard data processing methods. Muirhead, Donald, M.D., Chairman 1971 Report on Perinatal and Infant Mortality in Massachusetts 1967 and 1968. Committee on Perinatal Welfare of the Massachusetts Medical Society. Boston, Massachusetts. GENERAL ABSTRACT: The report tabulates the major causes as they relate to various ages. The perinatal group is characterized by asphyxia, prematurity of unknown cause, abruptio placenta, congenital anomalies, cord abnormalities, Rh disease, sepsis and placental insufficiency. Infant deaths (less than one year) were characterized by ideopathic Respiratory Distress Syndrome, congenital anomalies, anoxia and central nervous system hemorrhage, sepsis and "Sudden Unexpected Death" as immediate causes. 66ANNOTATIONS: Preventability and Responsibility The Committee felt that 35% of the deaths studied might have been prevented. Responsibility for these preventable deaths was assigned to maternal factors (30%); obstetrical factors (46%) and pediatric factors (40%). The report notes that these are not mutually exclusive. Improving Perinatal and Infant Mortality Some of the suggested areas for concentrating upon: Education of the obstetrician—1) The concept of postmaturity (16% of the obstetrically related preventable deaths in the fetal age group concerned women beyond the 42nd week of gestation). 2) Techniques of fetal monitoring, tests of placental dysfunction and fetal well-being. 3) Diabetes, and other maternal medical and surgical illnesses requiring special expertise. The concept of the incompetent cervix. 4) Problems concerning early elective caesarean section. Education of the pediatrician—1) Sepsis; a continued review of the frequently non-specific signs and symptoms in the newborn period. 2) Management of the infant with the Respiratory Distress Syndrome. 3) Signs, symptoms and management of congenital heart disease. 4) The importance of oxygen therapy, maintenance of body temperature, hypoglycemia, and acid-base balance. Some other recommendations include the following: • Combining of certain maternity services under one physical plant unless geographic reasons dictate otherwise. • When a high-risk mother is identified prior to delivery, care should be observed that the hospital of delivery be fully equipped to handle any of her anticipated problems as well as that of her newborn. • Explore the feasibility of a "high-risk" maternal and infant registry. • The institution of a statewide transport system divided on a regional basis for the neonate (and possibly the mother when necessary) to provide efficient and safe transport to an established regional intensive care nursery. • All maternity services and newborn units should be provided with consultation services (i.e., neonatologists, internists, obstetrics, hematologists, etc.) in order that they might provide increasingly better care for more of their own problems. • A system for the automatic matching of birth and death certificates should be established in our vital statistics departments. • The formation of a perinatal mortality committee should be required for all maternity services. It should form the basis of peer review. 67Murphy, J. and W.A. Hodson 1974 "Neonatal Intensive Care". Postgraduate Medicine 56: 55-58. GENERAL ABSTRACT: Potential Patient Load: The potential patient load must be estimated when a neonatal ICU is planned. The total population of the area to be served, its birth rate, and the incidence of prematurity directly influence this figure and are in turn directly related to overall socioeconomic status and to utilization of maternal health care facilities. ANNOTATIONS: In an area with a population of one million and a birth rate of 17 per thousand, 5% of newborn infants will be sick and about half of these, or about 425 each year, will require intensive care. Experience indicates that the average stay in a neonatal ICU is 12 days. Accordingly, in an area with a population of one million, 425 infants require 5, 100 bed - days and 14 beds. If we assume an 80% bed occupancy, about 18 neonatal ICU beds are required. Transport: Safe, efficient transport of infants is of prime importance in operating a referral unit. The transport vehicle must be rapidly and efficiently mobilized, must carry a heated incubator capable of maintaining a stable thermal environment, and must have facilities to administer and monitor a controlled supply of oxygen. A physician, nurse, or other medically trained person adept in resuscitation procedures should accom- pany the infant. The infant being transported should be readily visible to the attendant and easily accessible for care and resuscitation. Ground transport is not practical within a 20 to 30 mile radius of the central hospital. Air transport may be more rapid beyond this radius. Staff: The ratio of nurses to patients in a neonatal ICU may vary from 1:1 to 1:3, depending on the number of infants in the unit who are critically ill or convalescing. Consideration should be given to several innovative staff patterns, including nursing shifts of ten hours to provide overlap and better continuity of care. A team made up of nurses aides, practical nurses, and highly trained registered nurses may prove more efficient and cover a broad spectrum of duties, ranging from feeding and bathing of infants to resuscitation and ventilator support. All diagnostic laboratory facilities as well as pulmonary therapy services must be accessible within the hospital 24 hours a day, which means the appropriate personnel must be available at all times. Micromethod determinations are essential for biochemical and hematologic monitoring of neonates, whose total blood volume is only 80 ml/kg of body weight. 68Pomerance, Jeffrey, M.D., Christine T. Ukrainski, M.D., Tara Ukra, Diane H. Henderson, M.D., Andrea H. Nash, M.D. and Janet L. Meredith, R.N., B.S. 1978 "Cost of Living for Infants Weighing 1,000 Grams or Less at Birth". From the Department of Pediatrics, Ceders-Sinai Medical Center and University of California at Los Angeles. Pediatrics 61: 908-910. GENERAL ABSTRACT: This article reports the in-hospital cost of caring for 75 infants weighing 1,000 grams or less at birth who were born during the two and one-half year period between January 1973 and June 1975. Thirty infants (40%) survived. Nineteen of 27 infants tested (70%) appear to be neurologically and developmentally "normal" at one to three years of age. Hospital charges were adjusted to September 1976 rates and corrected for a 94% collection rate. Physicians' fees represented less than 5% of the total bill and were not included. The average adjusted daily and total costs for the 45 infants who died were $825 and $14,236, respectively. The average adjusted daily and total costs for the 30 survivors were $450 and $40,287, respectively. The average adjusted total cost per "normal" survivor was $88,058. It is the authors' belief that the outcome justifies this expense.' Society, however, must be the ultimate j udge. ANNOTATIONS: Overall Cost The total adjusted cost for the 45 non-surviving infants was $640,634. The total adjusted cost for the 30 surviving infants was $1,208,582. The overall total adjusted cost for both groups was $1,849,216. The percentage breakdown of the total charges for the 75 infants is as follows: room charges, 43%; ventilation and oxygen support, 19%; blood gases, 11%; pharmacy, 9%; miscellaneous, 1%. Fully 30% of the total charges was for support and management of ventilation and oxygenation. (Changes were adjusted to September 1976 rates.) If the total adjusted cost for the 30 survivors alone is used to cal- culate the cost per survivor, the result is $40,287. This figure greatly underestimates the true cost, because care provided to infants who die must surely be included in any calculations of cost per sur- vivor. When total adjusted cost for all 75 infants is used to calculate cost per survivor, then the figure becomes $61,641 per survivor. Survival, however, should not be taken as the sole measure of success. A much more meaningful definition would include evaluations of the infant's potential to become a normal, productive member of society. In developmental/ neorological follow-up evaluations, 19 to 27 infants (70%) were apparently functioning normally. If we assume that three infants whose parents did not permit them to be examined had approximately the same developmental 69quotient distribution as the other 27 infants who were examined, then the figure of 21 infants (19 of 27 infants examined plus 2 of 3 not examined) may be used as the most realistic denominator to equate cost per "normal" survivor. This figure is $88,058. Quebec Perinatal Mortality Committee 1967 "Analysis of Perinatal Deaths by Cause, Part Two". Quebec, Canada. Available from: Quebec Perinatal Committee, Ministry of Social Affairs Province of Quebec, 1005 Chemin Ste-Foy, Quebec, Canada, GlS 4N4. GENERAL ABSTRACT: In this analysis the cause of death was assigned according to a specific classification on the basis of information received in a de- tailed (150 item) questionnaire. These questionnaires were completed for stillbirths and first week neonatal deaths by perinatal mortality committees organized in each hospital with obstetric facilities. This information was reviewed by the provincial committee and the assigned cause of death was either approved or amended according to circumstances. During the first year of operation of the Perinatal Mortality Committee, detailed questionnaires were received for 46% of the Province's 2,960 perinatal deaths. These deaths occurred among 104,168 births registered in the 158 obstetrics services in Quebec. All told, 81 hospitals completed and returned questionnaires and among these, 50 hospitals submitted analysis on 75% or more of their perinatal deaths. For most purposes, only deaths of infants weighing over 1,000 grams at birth were analyzed. In fact, infants whose weight at birth is less than 1,000 grams almost always (97%) die and analysis of the cause of their death elicits little information of value in assessing preventive factors. There were 103,476 infants born in the province weighing over 1,000 grams; of this number 2,289 died, and 1,005 of these cases (44%) were analyzed on the appropriate questionnaire by the respective hospital committee. Total perinatal mortality is 17.9 deaths per 1,000 births. "Asphyxia" of various causes is responsible for 6.1 deaths per 1,000 births; "mal- formations", for 32; "respiratory syndrome", for 2.7; the other causes together account for 2.4 per 1,000. After these deaths have been accounted for, 3.5 deaths per 1,000 remain explained. ANNOTATIONS: Asphyxia Neonatal deaths or stillbirths were considered due to "asphyxia" if asphyxia before or during birth, unrelated to pre-existing fetal pathology, 70was thought sufficient to account for the death. Deaths were attributed to "unexplained peripartum asphyxia" when fetuses died during labor of uncertain cause or neonatal deaths occurred due to birth asphyxia of unknown cause. Unexplained stillbirths dying before labor were listed as unexplained deaths, rather than deaths due to asphyxia. Death by asphyxia of infants who were significantly underweight for gestational age was assigned to "fetal malnutrition" rather than to "asphyxia" per se. Asphyxia from all causes except fetal malnutrition was responsible for 2.2 neonatal deaths and 3.9 stillbirths per 1,000 births. The death rates from specific causes of asphyxia are documented in this paper. Thev are, briefly, antepartum hemorrhage, umbilical cord loops, knots or hematomata, prolapsed cord, unexplained peripartum asphyxia, certain maternal diseases, and meconium aspiration. Comments: Improved fetal heart monitoring, intensive care during labor and delivery, and expert infant resuscitation at birth could pre- sumably reduce the rate of death by asphyxia when asphyxia occurs during labor or delivery. In 1967, there were 186 such peripartum asphyxia deaths which could have been prevented had conditions been ideal. The report presents de- tails of this. Congenital Malformations This category includes any perinatal death due to a malformation, a complication of a malformation, or to corrective surgery for such a malformation. In addition, infants dying of other or ill-defined causes who had life-threatening or potentially serious malformations were assigned as malformation deaths rather than to causes such as infection, respiratory distress syndrome, fetal malnutrition, or unexplained deaths. Malformations, thus defined, accounted for 3.1 deaths per 1,000 births, and 70% of them were neonatal deaths. Of all malformation deaths, anecephaly accounted for 1.1 per 1,000 births, other central nervous system malformations .5, heart 0.7 gastrointestinal 0.3, genitourinary 0.3, chromosomal 0.1, and other malformations 0.1. Of the 122 liveborn infants dying of malformations, in only 9 cases were the lesions such that surgical correction had a fair chance of being successful. Comments: Only an insignificant proportion of malformation deaths could have been avoided with better treatment. With present lack of under- standing of the etiology of most anomalies, these losses of 3 or 4 infants per 1,000 births must be considered inevitable. Furthermore, it must be noted that deaths from malformations also often occur after 7 days of life and are not, therefore, included here. Respiratory Distress Syndrome Respiratory Distress Syndrome accounted for 2.7 deaths per 1,000 births. Autopsies were performed in 66% of the cases, and hyaline membranes were found in 88% of those autopsied. Comments: Progress in neonatal intensive care has greatly reduced mortality from R.D.S. It is probable that at least one-half of the R.D.S. deaths would be avoidable if neonatal intensive care were generally available. 71Iso-immunization This condition is considered the cause of death when the diagnosis of iso-immunization is confirmed serologically or at an autopsy. Death may occur in utero or may occur after birth from hydrops, anemia or kernicterus. Since serological tests and autopsies are often lacking in the deaths re- viewed across the province, the true mortality from this cause must be somewhat higher than that obtained in this study. This cause of death accounted for 0.4 neonatal deaths and 0.5 stillbirths per 1,000 births. Ninety percent of these deaths were due to the Rh "D" antibody. Of the 24 neonatal deaths from iso-immunization, 19 were due to anemia with hydrops, 2 to kernicterus, and 3 to complications of exchange transfusion. Comments: Since the incidence of iso-immunization is usually 8 per 1,000 births, a perinatal mortality of 1.1 per 1,000 births suggests that mortality rate among affected infants was about 1.1/8 or 14%, a generally accepted mortality rate for this disease. As most infants with iso-immunization receive one or more exchange transfusions, it can be estimated that 7 deaths from exchange transfusions in perhaps 800 affected infants would mean an operative mortality rate of 1%, which compares favorably with published rates. Deaths from Rh hemolytic disease after 32 weeks of gestation are preventable by selective premature delivery of severely affected infants. Hence, more than 50% of the 1967 deaths could have been prevented. Trauma Birth trauma was considered the cause of death only when a specific traumatic lesion sufficient to cause death was found in an infant after a difficult delivery. Infants who died from birth asphyxia after difficult deliveries, without definite evidence of such specific traumatic lesions, were assigned as having died from asphyxia due to abnormal labor and delivery rather than from trauma per se. Birth trauma was assigned as the cause of death in 0.1 deaths per 1,000 births. The 7 cases included 6 of trauma to the head, and 1 to internal organs. Comments: Deaths from trauma are potentially preventable, given early diagnosis of obstetrical problems and ready access to Caesarean section delivery. Possibility of Reducing Perinatal Deaths In the present state of medical knowledge, certain perinatal deaths cannot be significantly reduced. Such are stillbirths occurring before labor, either because of antepartum hemorrhage, umbilical cord loops, or for no apparent reason. This section suggests that the present perinatal death rate of 22.1 per 1,000 births weighing over 1,000 grams could presumably approximate the irreducible minimum of 8.3 per 1,000 births, which would mean that 62% of the present perinatal mortality rate could potentially be prevented, in the widest sense of the word. 72It is noted that infants weighing 2,500 grams or more at birth, representing 93% of the population, accounted for only one-quarter of neonatal deaths. Infants of 1,000-2,499 grams, 7 deaths, and the 500-999 grams newborn infants, who comprise less than half of 1% of the population, answer for the remaining one-quarter of all neonatal deaths. Consequently, efforts to reduce neonatal mortality should be con- centrated on application of more effective preventive measures and resuscitative treatment of birth asphyxia, as well as toward improvement of the management of the low birthweight infant with respiratory distress syndrome. Age at Neonatal Death Of infants weighing more than 1,000 grams who died during the first week, 42% died within 12 hours and 79% within 48 hours. Forty-five percent of infants of birthweight 1,000-2,499 grams, and 26% of infants dying of R.D.S. had died by the 12th hour following birth. A similar high frequency of early death is noted among infants dying from iso-immunization or of unexplained causes. As these are the weight groups and diseases most responsive to neonatal intensive care, it is evident that intensive care facilities should, wherever possible, be available within, or readily accessible to, the maternity hospitals where such infants are born if considerable losses during the first 12 hours are to be prevented. Deaths (and brain damage) from birth asphyxia are only reducible by intervention during labor and by expert resuscitation at delivery. Birth asphyxia is not susceptible to treatment after the first few minutes of life; it requires, therefore, intensive care facilities within the hospital where delivery is made. Effect of Intensive Care and Hospital Size Overall perinatal mortality is 16.6 and 18.4 for hospitals with 1,000 deliveries a year or over with an intramural neonatal intensive care service, or referring cases to hospitals so equipped. The mortality rate is 20.3 for the same category of hospitals not utilizing either form of intensive care facility, and 24.3 per 1,000 in hospitals registering less than 1,000 deliveries a year. The difference is mainly due to: • A lower rate of mortality due to respiratory distress syndrome (1.65 deaths per 1,000 for cases with intramural neonatal intensive care facilities and 3.5 per 1,000 when intramural intensive care is lacking); • Deaths from unexplained causes, which are approximately 50% higher in hospitals not using neonatal intensive care facilities; and • Deaths from asphyxia which are approximately 35% higher in small hospitals. 73Quebec Perinatal Mortality Committee 1975 Significant Reduction in Perinatal Deaths in Quebec, 1967 to 1973. Press Release (December). Quebec, Canada. Available from: Quebec Perinatal Committee, Ministry of Social Affairs Province of Quebec, 1005 Chemin Ste-Foy, Quebec, Canada, G1S 4N4. GENERAL ABSTRACT: The Quebec Perinatal Committee has analyzed all perinatal deaths which occurred in the province since 1967. This study permits an evaluation of the perinatal health care situation in Quebec. ANNOTATIONS: In 1967, the perinatal mortality for infants weighing more than 1,000 grams at birth was 22.1 per 1,000. In 1973, this rate had fallen to 14.4 per 1,000, a fall of 35% in 6 years. There were 2,289 perinatal deaths over 1,000 grams in 1967 and 1,265 in 1973, that is a difference of 1,024 of which only one-third is attributable to the decreasing birth rate. Most deaths occur among low birthweight infants (2,500 grams or less). It was determined that the decrease in mortality in Quebec was not attributable to a reduced incidence of low birthweight infants which remained unchanged over the 6-year period. The reduced perinatal mortality rate is, therefore, considered largely due to the improved care delivered to the mother, fetus and newborn. Improved obstetrical care is evident by a 33.9% reduction in stillbirth rate. Combined improvements in obstetrical and neonatal care have resulted in a 36.4% decrease in neonatal mortality. The authors explain that regional differences in mortality depend, to a large degree, on the accessibility of care for the low birthweight infant. Neonatal mortality for low birthweight infants is 86 per 1,000 for regions other than Montreal, 49 per 1,000 in the Montreal region, and 24 per 1,000 in the hospitals comprising the "optimum" group. If the best modern medical techniques were generally available, the irreducible minimum perinatal mortality rate could be approached. The authors explain that each year about 3 infants per 1,000 die of lethal malformations incompatible with life. Four other deaths occur "in utero" during an apparently normal pregnancy, prior to onset of labor, unexpectedly. Also, approximately 1 or 2 more fetal deaths per 1,000 occur from potentially treatable conditions, but the fetus dies too early in pregnancy for inter- vention to be effective. These 8 or 9 deaths per 1,000 births represent the "irreducible minimum" perinatal mortality rate. The following is a summary of organizational developments now taking place in Quebec, as reported in this release: • The largest obstetrical hospital services are developing specialized intramural intensive care units for high risk pregnancy and neonatal 74care, and are training their personnel in order to give optimum care to mothers and babies at risk. • The regrouping of hospital services is making it possible to develop larger obstetrical services with better equipment and a better qualified personnel in order to face all situations. • Women who during their pregnancy present with complications that can compromise the life of the fetus, or those who enter into labor too prematurely, are referred by their physician to specialized centers where mother and baby can receive all of the care that may be required before, during and after birth. • Newborn infants delivered in centers not equipped for intensive care, who present problems at or after birth, are transferred by trained personnel to neonatal intensive care centers as quickly and safely as is possible. • Public health programs in perinatality are being developed across the province. These preventive programs are aimed to improve prenatal care and to inform and educate the public as the need for early care in pregnancy as well as for good nutrition and planned pregnancy. These programs include prenatal courses on pregnancy and delivery with an emphasis on education, physical conditioning, as well as psychological preparation for the coming event. Quilligan, Edward, M.D. and Philip Sunshine 1974 "Regionalization of Perinatal Care". Report of the Sixty-Sixth Ross Conference on Pediatric Research. Columbus, Ohio: Ross Laboratories. GENERAL ABSTRACT: A variety of systems needs and goals are described through the ex- periences of the participants in the Sixty -Sixth Conference on Pediatric Research. Heading topics discussed here include the progress of developing regionalized perinatal care systems in the United States, quality standards, recommended manpower goals, continuing education programs, consumer interest factors, and program effectiveness criteria. This comprehensive review of the major medical, demographic, and social factors which contribute to the trend toward the implementation of centralized community or regionalized perinatal programs underscores the increasing responsibility of physicians, government, and the public in planning for high-risk birth centers. 75ANNOTATIONS: Developmental and Educational Aspects of a Regionalization Program In the State of Wisconsin a three-year retrospective analysis was undertaken in order to determine the status of perinatal health care. All fetal and neonatal deaths, and all births of less than 2,500 grams were reviewed in 35 hospitals outside the resident county of the two area medical schools in the State. Two-thirds of the neonatal deaths and half of the fetal loss were determined to be preventable. Approximately 50% were determined preventable by utilization of a center with team resources. Three programs were then initiated: • Hospital perinatal surveys by a team of physicians and nurse practitioners to interview physicians and nurses. • Development of perinatal institutes consisting of eight to ten educational programs per year for nurses and physicians throughout the State. • Establishment of regional neonatal centers with commitments to education. Since the initiation of neonatal intensive care units in 1959, coupled with a statewide, continuing education program, there has been a progressive decline in the neonatal mortality rate. It is suggested that education has been the major consideration on continuing improvement in perinatal health care in Wisconsin. Further, peer review is cited as being essential to education, and is effective only when all of the interested parties review the case at the same time. As suggested, adding physicians and nurses in Wisconsin is not the answer to improving high-risk birth care. The problem, rather, is appro- priate location of the intensive care center in response to a clearly defined critical need. In Wisconsin the following guidelines were used in determining peri- natal care service regions: • Design State and community needs assessment. • Look for a medical group which has time to devote to high-risk care. • Look for a hospital that will take risks both financially and procedure-wise. • Divide regions so that each has from 7,000 to 10,000 live births. • Feasibility of transportation within a region. • Feasibility as to where physicians and families will feel free to go for care. 76• The center personnel can be responsible for the education within the region. Perinatal Health Care in Mississippi, 1973 The experience with perinatal health care in Mississippi is well representative of the results gained in neonatal and infant mortality and morbidity. In 1968, Mississippi had the highest neonatal and infant mortality rates in the county. The rates for non-whites in both of these categories are higher than for whites. Contributing factors to this are: a statewide low birthweight rate of 15%, a deficit in parental education, a higher illegitimacy rate, and the overriding factor, the low income status of the infant's family. Yet, in Holmes and Hinds Counties a plan, described as a prototype for perinatal health services, was implemented recently. The program included: • Augmenting and upgrading the county health department services to the medically indigent pregnant and postpartal women and their infants, which essentially meant a change from the traditional health department's role of instituting preventive health measures to one of offering complete care to the ambulatory patients, including intensive home visiting. • Providing local physicians' services to the high-risk mothers and babies as well as community in-hospital care. • Training additional health workers in existing and new categories such as nurse-midwives, obstetric technicians and health aides to provide more health personnel for the target area. • Establishing a referral system to the university medical center for high-risk obstetric patients. Planners from the County Health Improvement Program believed that concentrating on and augmenting care during the maternity cycle and the first year of life would raise the level of health care of child-bearing women and their infants, decrease the numbers of birth-defective and damaged citizens, and ultimately improve the quality of life. Statistics indicate the neonatal and infant mortality rates have been reduced in Holmes County in the non-white population, the segment of the population primarily using these services, from above the national average in both categories in 1968 to near the national average in 1972. The Role of the State Department of Health in Regionalized Perinatal Care In 1970, the Massachusetts Department of Public Health began to develop conditions of participation for newborn services under the Medicaid program. Also, it was decided to revise completely the State licensure standards for obstetric and newborn services in order to make licensure 77and certification standards compatible and uniform, and to promote high- quality care and to introduce and facilitate new concepts of maternity and newborn care. The new regulations were developed with the assistance of a multi- disciplinary task force composed of groups and individuals involved in obstetric and newborn care. They have had an enormous impact, and it is reported that Massachusetts has seen substantial improvement in maternity and newborn services. Areas of important new regulation are: • The establishment of specific definitions and requirements for special-care nurseries and for high-risk newborns. • The requirement that every newborn service develop specific plans for high-risk newborns. Under the new regulations, hospitals with more than 2,000 deliveries were required to provide a special care or transfer nursery. Two thousand deliveries were required to develop a plan, which has to be approved by the State health department, for the care of their high-risk newborns either by transfer or special provisions within the hospital. • The establishment of more comprehensive and sensitive services including parent education programs, social services, case follow- up, provisions of family planning services and liberalized visiting policies. The Development of Infant Transport Systems In May of 1973, a national conference on research and maternal and child health was held in Berkeley, California. The results of the con- ference, a comparison of transported and nontransported infants, is outlined in this chapter. In 1967, Phoenix was selected as a demonstration center for trans- porting high-risk infants from rural hospitals to two metropolitan private hospitals having a combined rate of over 8,000 births per year. After three years of experience with the system of newborn intensive care and transport, significant reduction in neonatal mortality occurred. The most striking change was observed among infants weighing 1,001 to 2,500 grams who were born in the centers. Among these infants, the mortality was reduced by half from a formerly fixed rate of approximately 100 deaths per 1,000 live births. A later follow-up survey of 273 babies who had received care in the centers through February, 1971, yielded data on 147 survivors, of whom 132 appear to be well, normally developing children. Fifteen have some physical or developmental problems. In Arizona, there are now four state transport centers. It is estimated that greater than 70% of newborn infants needing newborn intensive care now receive it. As the percent of babies covered has increased, the State neonatal mortality rate has declined from 17.3 to 11.5 deaths per 1,000 live births. 78Evaluation of Equipment in Transport Systerns The variety of available transport units which have been reported range from a fully equipped mobile intensive care unit with complete facilities through a minimal vehicle equipped with an indoor incubator. The electrically powered equipment which is used will often include a heart rate monitor, along with an oscilloscope, a temperature monitor, an oxygen monitor and, less often, a blood pressure monitor. The function of the transporter is stated as follows: • The infant must be kept warm enough under all possible conditions which may be encountered to approximate the thermoneutrality which imposes the least drain on his scarce energy reserves. • He can be oxygenated conveniently. • He is "safe" within the transporter. • He is easily accessible for the delivery of intensive care during transport. Quilligan, Edward, M-D. 1972 "The Obstetric Intensive Care Unit". Hospital Practice 17: 61-69. GENERAL ABSTRACT: Neonatal intensive care requires a concentration of equipment and testing procedures that permits fetal-maternal status to be evaluated in much greater detail than is possible by traditional indices adequate for normal deliveries. The article discusses these in some detail and describes how the technology is housed and the patients for whom it is designed. ANNOTATIONS: Approach At the University of Southern California, there is a three-phase approach to high-risk patient care for the newborn: • A special clinic. • A special antepartum unit. • A special intrapartum unit (labor intensive care). 79Manpower In the antepartum ICU the ideal nurse-to-patient ratio is 1:5. In the labor intensive unit the nurse requirements are one for each patient. At least two physicians, who are residents or fellows, are in the unit at all times and the staff director is at hand. Pediatric coverage and OB anesthesia should also be available. Bed Need The article suggests that for OB ICU's with an annual delivery rate between 2,000 and 3,000 a unit of 10 beds—8 antepartum and 2 intrapartum covers most needs. Procedures Standard in ICU • Fetal heart rate monitoring. • External strain gauge. A diaphram device fitted over the abdomen can document the occurrence but not the intensity of labor contractions. • Ultrasonic detectors. Provide indications of the moving fetal heart's alteration of reflected sound frequencies. This provides qualification of fetal heart rate. • Measurement of urinary estriol. During the last trimester of pregnancy, this procedure provides a highly useful method of following the health of the fetus. Total estrogen output is pre- empted almost entirely by the fetaplaenatal unit as pregnancy advances; variations from normal excretory values may be associated with fetal jeopardy. • Lecithin/sphingomyelin ratio. This is helpful in determining whether the fetus has achieved pulmonary maturity. • Intrapartum procedure. This is the analysis of the acid-base balance in the fetal blood obtained by scalp puncture at various intervals during labor. Hence, the above procedures are examples of NICU techniques that make possible a more intimate and objective view of the fetus' progress through pregnancy, labor, and delivery. Reynolds, T. Thompson 1977 "The Results of Intensive Care Therapy for Neonates". Department of Pediatrics and Division of Neonatology. University of Minnesota. Journal of Medicine 59. 80GENERAL ABSTRACT: This paper reviews whether NICUs have reduced neonatal mortality rates and whether improvements in the care of sick neonates has decreased the incidence of long-term sequelae among NICU survivors. The paper offers a comprehensive, general discussion of neonatal mortality rates since the advent of NICUs. Also, it discusses neonatal mortality rates and long-term prognosis for low birth weight infants. This may be recommended as a helpful overview for planners and decision-makers who are trying to understand the various benefits which can, indeed, be derived from implementing a regional system. ANNOTATIONS: Overall Neonatal Mortality Rates Within one to seven years after the introduction in hospitals of NICUs for care of critically-ill neonates, overall neonatal mortality rates in the hospitals were reduced by 17% to 76%. Low Birth Weight (LBW) Newborn Infants Newborns with birth weights under 2501 grams account for 67% to 75% of neonatal deaths with the majority of first-week deaths not due to congenital anomalies occurring among the approximately 1% of live births in the USA and Canada weighing 500 to 1501 grams. Usher has reported that the mortality rate for infants 1001-1500 grams at birth was reduced by one-half with the establishment of an NICU at Royal Victoria Hospital in Montreal. During 1974-1975, 59% of 105 live births weighing 501-1500 grams at birth survived at Royal Victoria Hospital, including 94% of the infants 1251-1500 grams and 74% of the infants 1001-1250 grams at birth. Long-Term Prognosis Prior to the advent of intensive care therapy for LBW neonates, the incidence of neurologic and/or intellectual deficits among LBW survivors often exceeded 50%. The incidence and severity of such handicaps in- creased as birth weight and gestational age decreased. Drillien has stated that the development of the neonate delivered prematurely as a re- sult of a catastrophe or accident is totally dependent on the quality of care delivered in the perinatal period. In Los Angeles, California, the improved prognosis for infants under 1500 grams, birth weight has been attributed to intensive care management: 22% of 37 infants born in 1964-1965 had definite neurologic or develop- mental deficits compared to 3.3% of 60 infants delivered in 1969-1970. A review by the Maternal and Child Health Task Force of the State Health Planning Advisory Council in the State of Michigan of the effective- ness of intensive care in rendering long-term morbidity for neonates 81revealed that 50% to 70% of the cases of severe mental retardation due to perinatal factors could be prevented, resulting in a 20% to 30% re- duction of children with severe mental retardation. Improved social, educational and economic conditions would decrease neonatal mortality rates by reducing the incidence of LBW infants, particularly those weighing under 1500 grams. Richardson, Joan C., M.D. 1976 "Principles of Organization of a Neonatal Intensive Care Unit from Scratch". Clinics in Perinatology: Organization for Perinatal Care 3: 329-335. Guest Editor: Louis Gluck, M.D. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders Company. GENERAL ABSTRACT: The essential first step in planning a unit is the evaluation of community and regional needs for neonatal intensive care as well as the resources and capability of the hospital that undertakes to provide those needed services. ANNOTATIONS: Potential Patient Load and Size of the Unit In planning a neonatal intensive care unit, it is necessary to pro- ject the potential number of patients to be cared for. The total population of the area to be used, its birth rate, incidence of prematurity, and neonatal mortality rate directly influence this figure. This in turn is very important because it provides a basis for determining what the bed capacity of the unit should be, (Swyer, P.R.: The regional organi- zation of special care for the neonate. Pediatric Clinics in North America, 17: 761, 1970). The bed requirement for a neonatal intensive care unit equals: regional neonatal mortality rate X 3 X number of live births in thousands for the region 60 Recent data indicate that the average occupancy of a bed in a NICU is approximately 10 to 11 days, permitting one bed to service about 35 patients per year, and thus, increasing the bed requirement for any given region above the number suggested by Swyer (see above reference). Economics Construction and remodeling costs range from $60 to $80 per square foot. Equipment expenditures approximate $12,000 to $15,000 per intensive care 82bed. A minimum cost range for one day of intensive care is $200 to $300. A facility providing service to a population with 10,000 births, delivering about 2,000 maternal cases, and receiving 300 to 400 neonatal transfers has an annual operation budget of $2.6 million. Transportation The unit must be geographically and demographically located such that difficulties in the transportation of high-risk infants are minimized. Design and Space For each intensive care bed, 80 to 100 square feet are required with 40 to 60 square feet per intermediate care bed and 20 to 30 square feet per bed for other care areas. Areas for non-patient care activities should be included in the overall design of the unit. Equipment and Utility Requirements Each intermediate care bed requires 6 to 8 electrical outlets plus 2 oxygen and 1 outlet each for suction and compressed air. Equipment needs in the intermediate care area vary according to the individual infant's condition, but most likely equipment for temperature support, continuous cardiac monitoring, and indirect blood pressure determination is required. Respiratory (apnea) monitors may be indicated in some cases. Personnel The NICU area requires a nurse to patient ratio of 1:1 or 1:2, whereas, a 1:3 to 1:5 ratio is necessary to staffing the intermediate care area. All other areas can be adequately staffed at a 1:4 to 1:6 nurse to patient ratio. Support Services Lab, radiology, blood bank, inhalation therapy, social service and medical electronics. Robert Wood Johnson Foundation 1978 Special Report: Regionalized Perinatal Services Princeton, NJ: The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation GENERAL ABSTRACT: This report is written in an understandably journalistic style and pre- sented in a magazine format. It is valuable as background material for 83technical committee and board members. Four articles and one graphic presentation are included. ANNOTATIONS: "Pregnant Women and Newborns at Risk Are the Focus of Efforts Nation- wide to Regionalize Perinatal Services" explains the need for regionaliza- tion, the high risk phenomenon and its relation to infant mortality, and the emergence of perinatal and neonatal medical specialties. The article details functions of a regional perinatal system and discusses essential aspects as reflected in the seven regional demonstration projects funded by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. System organization, (the Committee on Perinatal Health model), communications, transport (of mother and infant), medical records and education programs are briefly discussed. The issues which data from the demonstration projects are expected to address are also discussed. "Adam and Amanda" is a human interest article following the experience of two high-risk births. "The Evaluation Process: Spectrum of Morbidity" presents preliminary data in graphic form on morbidity of a random sample of infants from the demonstration regions by birth weight, race, family income and prior pregnancy history. "The Technologies for Detecting and Managing High Risk" briefly defines eight technologies and their uses: ultrasound (sonography), amniocentesis, estriol measurements, lecithin/sphingomyelin ratios, oxytocin challenge test, fetal monitoring, ventilatory support for the new- born and neonatal monitoring. Russel, Keith P., M.D., Sprague H. Gardiner, M.D., and Ervin E. Nichols, M.D. 1975 "A Conceptual Model for Regionalization and Consolidation of Obstetrics- Gynecologic Services". American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 121: 756-764. GENERAL ABSTRACT: A conceptual model for the organization of regionalization is pre- sented with consideration of patient care and services, medical education and research as they apply to the model. ANNOTATIONS: The model set forth in the article is the three-Level model suggested by the National Perinatal Committee. 84Population In making birth projections, certain assumptions must be made. In reviewing the population estimates and projections published by the United States Department of Commerce, the cohort fertility method is used. The key assumption in this method is the average number of children a cohort of women will bear during its lifetime. The "completed cohort fertility rate" is the number of children born to a cohort of 1,000 women upon completion of childbearing. Birth data collected in 1971 and 1972 showed a major drop in birth expectations; thus, we are now at about 2.1 births per woman in the childbearing years. Using a more conservative projection, such as 1.8 births per woman, we find that by 1985, we should expect from 3.6 million up to 4.5 million births per year. The 1967 ACOG "National study of maternity care" indicated that over 64% of all deliveries at that time were carried out in hospitals delivering 1,000 or more infants per year, and that another 20% were in hospitals that delivered between 500 and 999 babies per year. It was also shown that 16% of the deliveries were done in hospitals which had less than 500 deliveries per year but represented 56% of hospitals surveyed. Another significant factor brought out in this study was the utiliza- tion of hospital facilities. The ACOG Committee on Professional Standards has suggested that three delivery rooms should be adequate for 3,000 deliveries. In the ACOG study, it was shown that this level of utilization did not occur until the delivery load reached 1,000 per year or more. The same situation prevailed in the use of maternity beds. Following the initiation of a neonatal intensive care unit at the University of Tennessee Medical Units in Memphis in the middle of 1970, the overall neonatal mortality rate fell from an annual average of 11.7 per 1,000 live births over the preceding eight years to 8.5 per 1,000 during the year starting July 1, 1970. Neonatal Mortality Rates in Regional Programs In Wisconsin the statewide neonatal mortality rate had been declining very slowly from 16.9 to 14.9 per 1,000 live births between 1960 and 1968. The continuing education program was started in 1967 and 4 intensive care units were opened in 1968 and 1969. In 1969 the statewide neonatal mortality rate dropped fairly sharply to 12.9 per 1,000, with a further drop to 12.6 in 1970. The full impact of the program was evident in the area served by one of the intensive care units which had been opened in 1968. The neonatal mortality rate in the units service area, which had been hovering around 15 per 1,000 between 1960 and 1968 declined to 12.8 in 1969, with further decline to 11.7 in 1970. 85Ryan, George M., Jr., M.D. 1977 "Regional Planning for Maternal and Perinatal Health Services". Seminars in Perinatology: Regionalization of Perinatal Care 1: 255-266. Guest Editor: Leo Stern, M.D. New York: Grune and Stratton. GENERAL ABSTRACT: This is an excellent presentation of issues and concepts in the regionalization of maternal and perinatal care. It summarizes the history and current problems in maternal and perinatal care, types of patients which are considered "high risk", and describes the Committee on Perinatal Health model of a regional system. The article details functions and care capabilities of institutions within the system, examines issues in developing perinatal systems and describes the outcomes of programs in Arizona, Wisconsin, Massachusetts and Quebec. ANNOTATIONS: Responsibilities and special services in a regionalized system. Level I Facilities The Level I unit must be justified by geographic necessity. Its responsibilities are to provide uncomplicated maternal and perinatal care in areas not served by other units and to provide emergency management of unexpected complications of mother or infant. This hospital deals with an isolated population and, therefore, must conduct an active program of early identification of high-risk patients so that appropriate arrange- ments can be made for consultation and/or delivery at another site. Personnel should be familiar with services available elsewhere in the system.. Electronic fetal monitoring should be available at Level I units to allow for the earliest identification of fetal danger during the intra- partum period. All delivery room personnel must receive ongoing education on neonatal resuscitation, and each delivery room should have appropriate equipment for current resuscitation techniques. The Level I facility should have type 0, Rh-negative blood and fresh frozen plasma in the facility at all times and blood available on call on a 24-hour basis. Anesthesia and delivery room capability should allow cesarian section to begin at all times within 30 minutes of a decision for its necessity. Level II Facilities Level II responsibilities include complete care for the uncomplicated obstetrical patient as well as the ability to manage most obstetrical complications. Maternal and perinatal intensive care is not included. 86Because of the increased safety offered by the capabilities of a Level II unit as compared to Level I, it is desirable that these requirements are promulgated throughout the United States. If this occurs, those hospitals not meeting these standards would continue in operation only because of a clearly demonstrated need for their presence. Special facilities provided by Level II units should include an operating room for cesarean sections within or in close proximity to the obstetric suite. Isolation facilities should be available for mother and/or child. Special facilities for neonatal care should include a transitional nursery in which all newborn infants may be observed and stabilized before a decision as to final disposition is made and a special care nursery in which compromised infants can receive definitive treatment or treatment prior to transfer, if needed, to a Level III unit. Facilities must also be provided for ancillary services, such as required laboratory determinations, x-ray, ultrasound, and blood bank. Special services at this level are many. Available prenatal labora- tory services should include urinary estriol determinations and photometric analysis of amniotic fluid, lechitin, and sphingomyelin ratios. Ancillary services should include ultrasound, social services, and nutritional counseling. During the intrapartum period, continuous electronic maternal- fetal monitoring should be available. A 15-minute start-up time for cesarean section is recommended. There should be a 24-hour in-house anesthesia service and 24-hour blood bank, radiology, and clinical labora- tory services. This unit should be able to resuscitate the newborn in the delivery room or, if necessary, in the recovery unit, including short- term assisted ventilation, external cardiac massage, and intravenous therapy. Appropriate equipment must be immediately available. In the neonatal period, 24-hour service should be provided for micro- scopic laboratory determinations of bilirubin, blood sugars, electrolytes, hematocrit, and blood gases obtained via the umbilical artery. The special care nursery should be able to treat infants mildly ill with respiratory distress syndrome, unstabilized respiratory functions, hyperbilirubinemia, hypoglycemia, and superficial and localized infections. In addition, it should be able to perform continuous cardiorespiratory monitoring, measure central arterial and venous pressures, and perform exchange transfusions. Level III Facilities The responsibility of the Level III unit is essentially that of the Level II unit with the addition of providing intensive care for maternity and neonatal patients as well as special services for the entire region. Regional responsibilities include management of the transportation system, a consultation service for the other hospitals in the region, and regional evaluation of process as well as outcome. Special services provided by the Level III unit include ambulatory consultation for prenatal patients of other physicians in the region. This allows the patient to continue to receive antepartum care from her primary obstetrician while benefiting from the facilities and services available. 87at the Level III unit. Antepartum beds should be provided for those patients who must be admitted for close observation for a period of time prior to delivery. During the intrapartum period, all current techniques for assessment of the intrauterine status of the fetus should be available. When fetal jeopardy is indicated, immediate cesarean section must be available. This necessitates 24-hour in-house obstetrical anesthesia coverage. As at Level II, other critical diagnostic services, including x-ray and clinical laboratory services, must be available on a 24-hour basis with in-house personnel. Care of those patients transferred to the Level III facility from other units in the region will ultimately be the responsibility of the director for obstetrics or neonatology. Nevertheless, when possible, the referring physician should continue to participate in the patient's care. For example, an obstetrician at a Level II unit with a diabetic patient who was transferred to a Level III unit for in-hospital intensive observation and care during the late prenatal course could still perform the delivery at the Level III unit when the time arises. This would enhance continuity of patient care as well as acceptance by patients of the advantages of the regional system approach. Regional services provided by Level III units include transportation and data collection and analysis. Standardized data must be analyzed at regular intervals. Analysis should be a joint responsibility of repre- sentatives from throughout the region. Regional maternal and perinatal re- view committees allow for a mutual feeling of responsibility for solving problems that all have participated in identifying. Financing of regional programs such as transportation, data acquisition and analysis, and continuing education has not as yet been solved. The Level III unit alone cannot finance these regional programs in addition to meeting its responsibility for care of its own patients. Functions Common to all Facilities Certain functions will be common to all facilities within the region. These include outreach and prenatal care. Pregnancy outcome is related to early registration of the pregnant patient, her continuation within the system, and a standardized course of prenatal care. One of the regional goals will be to establish an outreach program to insure early registration of every pregnant patient. This is an urgently needed program in the best tradition of public health. An outreach program must utilize all patient contact points, such as neighborhood health.centers, family planning centers, abortion clinics, and pregnancy testing laboratories to encourage early registration of patients. Widespread media campaigns can be helpful in the process of public education, and efforts must be made to reach pregnant women, especially teenagers, in places they frequent. Volunteer organizations can be most helpful in these undertakings. These programs must be seen as an essential component throughout the regional system and must receive a high priority in funding. 88The Schlesinger, Edward R., M.D. 1973 "Neonatal Intensive Care Planning and Outcomes Following Care". Journal of Pediatrics 82: 916-920. GENERAL ABSTRACT: Recent findings strongly suggest that neonatal intensive care has resulted in a decrease in the neonatal mortality rate and in a lower prevalence of serious handicapping conditions among the survivors. This article concisely summarizes several of the studies showing that neonatal mortality has been reduced significantly in programs of neonatal intensive care. Moreover, it points out the benefits that have been derived from regional systems, including means for transferring infants between different levels of care facilities. ANNOTATIONS: Neonatal Mortality Rates in Individual Centers At the Johns Hopkins Hospitals where changes in newborn care were introduced as they occurred over a period of years, there was a reduction of nearly 32% in the neonatal mortality rate among single live-born infants with birth weights of 2,500 grams or less who were born in the hospital between 1961 to 1962 and 1967 to 1968. At the University College Hospital in London, the survival rate to 28 days of age among infants born in the hospital or admitted from other institutions increased to about 73% in the 1,000 to 1,500 gram group in 1967 to 1968 compared to an average of about 55% during the preceding five years. Proportionate gains in survivorship among 500 to 1,000 gram infants. The exact timing of the introduction of intensive care techniques at this hospital is not clear. At Vanderbilt University Hospital, a neonatal intensive care nursery was opened in early 1960's. The average overall neonatal mortality rate of 23.3 per 1,000 live births during the 1950's declined to 18.6 in the 1963 to 1968 period. In the weight group between 1,000 and 2,500 grams, the average rate declined from 188 to 65 per 1,000 live births between the two time periods. At the Mount Zion Hospital in San Francisco, following the introduction of perinatal intensive care services late in 1966, the overall neonatal mortality rate dropped from 33.5 per 1,000 live births in 1966 to 15.2 in 1967 and a low of 8.8 in 1970. Among infants weighing 2,500 grams or less at birth, the rate fell from 218 per 1,000 in 1966, to 129 per 1,000 in 1967, and to 66 per 1,000 in 1970. Among very low birth weight infants (1,500 grams or less at birth), an impressive decline was also recorded from 792 to 577 to 375 deaths per 1,000 live births in the 3 years, respectively. 89Scott, K.E., M.D. 1970 "It's Only Statistics: An Approach to Perinatal Mortality in Nova Scotia". The Nova Scotia Medical Bulletin 81-83. GENERAL ABSTRACT: The relatively high perinatal mortality rate in Nova Scotia is analyzed. Particular reference is made to the regional variations existing within the province, the factors in perinatal mortality, and to the ways in which the perinatal mortality rate might be reduced. Recommendations are made for a program of improved perinatal care, so that both perinatal mortality as well as morbidity might be radically reduced. ANNOTATIONS: The report recommends the following guidelines which may be helpful to planners, administrators and physicians: • Screen all pregnant women for high-risk factors present before labor. • Send all high-risk pregnancies to a high-risk referral center. • Promote with conferences the concept of a single, conveniently located hospital in the area for care of the women in un- expected premature labor, and for the transfer and care of the premature infant born unexpectantly. • Take steps to educate the public on the use of the one hospital in the area for any woman who goes into premature labor. • Promote the idea of one physician being in charge of the policies and overall quality of care in the nurseries. • Promote the obtaining of autopsies and the setting up of a perinatal committee to review all hospital stillbirths and neonatal deaths, not for the purpose of assigning blame, but to improve care of the next patient in the same circumstances. 90Stetson, John, M.D. and Paul R. Swyer, M.D. 1976 Neonatal Intensive Care. St Louis, Missouri: Warren H. Green, Inc. GENERAL ABSTRACT: Sections one and two of this book describe a definition of intensive care of the newborn and discuss some organizational problems in supplying services for a diverse community. This might be recommended for the reader interested primarily in discovering the experiences of certain doctors who have been involved with delivering care in a system of intensive newborn care, especially in Canada. Several pertinent articles are abstracted here. Minkowski, A. Section I, "Definition of Intensive Care of the Newborn". Dr. Minkowski addresses the issues of defining Neonatal Intensive Care and articulating standards and criteria for NICUs. ANNOTATIONS: Definition of Intensive Care of the Sick Newborn "The care which provides careful watching and treatment to a certain category of very ill newborns." This facility also requires having a specific capacity or style of delivery: • Twenty-four hour coverage and therapy. • The ability to deal momentarily with emergencies. • One nurse for each infant. • Constantly available qualified medical staff. • Constant monitoring of vital signs. • Available biochemistry around the clock. • Continuously available radiological service. The authors, unlike others, do not consider that sophisticated ventilators are necessarily included in the requirements for intensive care. One important question, valuable for an understanding of appropriate utilization of services, is "Who deserves intensive care in the newborn period?" In the authors view, intensive care is necessary for the following conditions: • Hyaline membrane disease as defined by clinical and radiological signs in grades 2, 3 and 4 of the disease. Occasionally patients with grade 1 hyaline membrane disease require intensive care when the PaO^ falls below 50 mm of mercury or when the apnea or other clinical incidents suggest that there are deteriorations. • Extremely severe cases of amniotic fluid aspiration. 91• Other severe respiratory difficulties such as pneumothorax with dyspnea, mediastinal and interstitial emphysema, or pneumonia. • Severe infection, i.e., septicemia, or meningitis. • Severe convulsive stages and coma. • Marked dysmaturity with hypoglycemia. • Certain operative and post operative conditions, mainly abdominal and cardiac. • Cardiac anomalies with failure. The authors make it clear that the following should not be included: • The normal premature, even the smallest. • Infants with mild infection. • Infants with intermittent convulsions • Transient hypoglycemia • Normal infant of a diabetic mother. Further, they say that for milder degrees of hyaline membrane disease, the case for intensive care is less clear. However, they specify if an intra-aortic catheter has been placed, the infant should be in an intensive care unit. It is recommended that a convalescent unit should be attached to the intensive care center so that this center can concentrate only on the acute severe cases. The medical staff other than residents and interns for a thirty-bed intensive care unit should be at least four specialized neonatologists operating by team (two per twenty-four hours). The laboratory should also be staffed by four technicians specially trained in micromethods twenty-four hours a day. The authors also advocate the availability of a doctor and nurse to maintain close contact with the parents, who should be allowed to visit within the unit as soon as possible. A mother is encouraged to take care of her baby as soon as he is convalescent. Conflicting if insufficient information to the parents has a major deleterious effect. This fact requires strong emphasis. The authors suggest that a thirty-bed unit is required to provide up to two weeks of intensive care and an attached unit for post intensive or convalescent care. In the experience of the authors, the attachment of a research unit has proved to be extremely useful, since electroencephalographers, neurologists, cardiologists, bacteriologists, and biochemists have access to all the important clinical material pre- senting research problems and in turn contribute to improvement in clinical care. Equipment This list of equipment is suggested as being standard for a neo- natal intensive care units • Fixed apparatus including facilities for cine with image amplification within the department. 92• Portable x-ray apparatus. • Monitoring for heart rate, ECG and blood pressure, respiration and temperature. • Ventilator, positive pressure; ventilator, negative pressure. • Equipment for constant positive and negative pressure breathing. • Equipment to measure intra-vascular pressures. • Equipment to measure intracardiac pressures. • Autoclave with computed program. • Infusion pumps, catheters. • Laboratory equipment for emergency service in biochemistry, bacteriology, including a scintillation counter, micro- coagulation techniques. In terms of maintaining a unit with only minimal requirements, the authors say that a good premature unit could include a four-bedded unit for intensive care in which aseptic catheterization of the aorta and manual resuscitation can be performed. Such a unit should have 24-hour coverage by trained physicians, nurses and laboratory technicians. In order to provide for continuity in care, long-term follow-up of the child who has undergone intensive neonatal care is valuable both for research and the understanding of the individual's health. The authors stress two points for follow-up study: • The subsequent pulmonary function should be evaluated. Broncho- pulmonary dysplasia is frequent when oxygen is applied directly to the alveolar wall. Whether or not this is a direct effect of oxygen toxicity, or a function of the seriousness of the case now kept alive by treatment but which might have otherwise have died, is debatable. • The accurate evaluation if the neurological status is still difficult. This is the process of being evaluated on coded forms and it has been noticed that many of the severely involved infants improve within six months. For instance, one medical doctor reports that the EEG's of prematures show diminishing spike wave activity with time. However, studies need to be continued until the preschool age. Cost In the United States and Canada, the approximate cost per day per infant for neonatal intensive care has been evaluated to be between $150- $200 a day. In one neonatal intensive care unit in Canada, the social security system reimburses per day per infant $100 (1971). The real cost is approximately $600/patient/day. Certainly, these costs are high for the system, and it is more efficient to practice preventive prenatal care. Comments The author mentioned that it might be necessary for a convalescent unit to be attached to a neonatal intensive care unit. Dr. Leo Stern, Professor of Medical Sciences at Brown University, contends that it is 93better to practice reverse referral—back to the initial hospital—in order to free the intensive care unit for its proper function of intensive care. Further, Dr. Stern notes that some health professionals in lesser developed countries feel that the developed countries should not have a monopoly on strongly technical, research-oriented neonatal intensive care centers. In fact, this type of facility might serve as the base for the future development of healthy living in countries such as Kenya. Perhaps as knowledge about neonatology and the science of newborns continues to grow, an international information-sharing network should be developed. The author agrees that a nurse or midwife trained to handle common emergency situations on the spot will prove to be very valuable. However, we also need to train neonatologists for evaluation of highly technical medical and biochemical problems. Dr. Paul Swyer, Associate Professor from the Department of Pediatrics at the University of Toronto, notes the problem of the most highly trained personnel being placed at the most intensive care level of facility. He explains that the selection of patients occurs through the lower level facilities in a regionalized system. Of course, those who are most highly trained in identifying high-risk patients must be concentrated at the regional center. He suggests that the solution to this problem will involve education and improved methods of communication with the periphery. A further requirement will then be a highly developed transport service. Finally, Dr. J.F. Lucey, from the University of Vermont College of Medicine, comments about the possible misuse of neonatal intensive care units. It is important to adhere to a specific definition of neonatal intensive care unit by improving perinatal care in lower level facilities. Burnard, Eric D. Section II, "Problems in Supplying Intensive Care for a Diverse Community". pp. 12-20 Dr. Burnard has written a paper which examines the obstetrical care in the State of New South Wales. He studied patterns of birth deliveries, maternal related health status, demography, and health facility management in this area of the Great Britain Continent. The elucidating discussion which follows a brief summary of Dr. Burnard's paper provides the reader with some perspectives on problems involved with operating a system with neonatal intensive care. ANNOTATIONS: Dr. Burnard notes the problem of immediately going to the public and press in order to obtain funds for construction of intensive care units. He suggests that this should be done through proper channels after being able to present data to support the certainty of substantially improved clinical results when an elaborate plan for newborn care is implemented. 94Dr. M. Klaus, from the Department of Pediatrics at Case-Western Reserve University, points out that our level of economic input into treating a 75-year old man with severe emphysema is perhaps an inefficient manner of allocating health resources. Instead, perhaps there should be a shift in emphasis whereby more of the resources are concentrated on the infant who has a potential life span of 70 years. Certainly, our attitudes are products of prevailing culture and it is necessary to change them where appropriate. Dr. Swyer points out the major problem in beginning negotiations between local hospital obstetric facilities and those who would like to centralize delivery of care under the regional concept. The problem, he maintains, is how to educate the local hospital to appreciate the necessity for centralization of specialized care, while continuing to maintain first class primary care for the emergency situation as well as for the healthy neonate. Further, it is important that the morale of the lower level hospital does not drop when the facility is asked to participate in a regionalization process. There must be an appreciation of the complementary nature of their roles. In this case, the results in the central unit will be as good as the peripheral hospital can. Karlberg, Peter "An Evaluation of Intensive Care of the Newborn: The Necessity for, and Results of Therapy", pp. 21-31. Dr. Karlberg, from the University of Goteborg, answers two primary questions about the quality of neonatal intensive care. First, he wants to know, "Is the system optimal for meeting the needs of the region?" Second, Dr. Karlberg is concerned with the success physicians are having with neonatal intensive care. He is most familiar with neonatal intensive care in the Goteborg region of Sweden. In the region there are two maternity hospitals of equal size in Goteborg as well as one children's hospital (261 beds). Each maternity hospital contains a neonatal unit for high-risk babies. These units are to 20-30 beds. The staff of the pediatric department of the Children's Hospital is in charge of the medical care of all newborn infants. The pediatrician supervises the medical care of the infant from the delivery room until discharge from the hospital. The pediatricians and the obstetricians, it is reported, have a stimulating association and complete collaboration is enjoyed. Dr. Karlberg discusses some issues involved in evaluating the operation of delivering neonatal intensive care and shares his views with other physicians from the United States and Canada. ANNOTATIONS: Evaluation The value of keeping neonatal mortality and morbidity figures is for follow-up purposes and the discovery of new trends or events. There may be some disagreement among physicians as to how certain information can 95be obtained and how the obtained information can later be recalled and monitored. Generally, there seems to be agreement as to what data needs to be gathered. In the evaluation of neonatal care, mortality and morbidity must be combined. There must be some statistical analysis provided as to the severity of morbidity, especially in reference to the type of treatment performed and in reference to the obstetrical history. There should be data on the social background of the family. Dr. Karlberg would recommend what he calls a "Medical Birth Record" system for data recording. He explains that the neonatal relevant infor- mation is stored on the first page of the hospital record for each mother and infant. This information can then be relayed between maternity and the child health service, as well as being used for risk grouping of the new- borns for directed health control. Information can also be sent from the maternity unit to the maternal postnatal care service. Certainly, in our record keeping systems, there is computerized processing for statistical data of various kinds and the possibility exists that this information can be used as a base for individual health records from birth onward. Moreover, Dr. Karlberg comments that this medical birth information must become an integral part of the clinical record and record the outcomes of delivery. It must be regarded by the clinician as very valuable for the patient. If the collection of information is considered to be a chore, the quality of the information gathered will not be sufficient to aid in administration of medical care. Stern, Leo, M.D. "Neonatal Mortality and Intensive Care in the Province of Quebec", pp. 33-37. Dr. Stern views neonatal mortality as a means to understand how the neonatal intensive care facility justifies its reason for existence. He considers the magnitude of demonstrable improvement in survival of the newborn, the impact of referral patterns on the results of neonatal health, and the need for comprehensive regional planning based on available facility and population distributions, as well as on realistic geographic lines. ANNOTATIONS: Dr. Stern speaks of a system combined of Group A hospitals which have their own in-service facilities for neonatal intensive care. Group B hospitals do not, but transfer the greatest proportion of their problems (at least 75% of subsequent deaths) to one of the two referral centers; while Group C hospitals in the same geographic locale as A and B have neither their own facilities as defined above nor do they transfer to the referral centers although they could easily have arranged to do so. Dr. Stern points out that hospitals who either have their own facility or utilize one of the available referral intensive care centers have very significantly better survival rates for their infants. It is reported that while there are no real differences between Group A and B 96hospitals, hospitals in Group C show a much higher neonatal mortality for both low birth weight and full-term infants (30% higher in the 1,000- 2,500 gram group and almost double in the greater than 2,500 gram group). Therefore, we may conclude that health status benefits are certainly derived from maintaining close referral relations between hospital centers which have high level intensive care capacities and hospitals which have lower care capacities. Stewart, A. 1972 "Prognosis for Infants of Very Low Birth Weight". London, England: University College Hospital. GENERAL ABSTRACT: The object of this study is to assess the extent to which intensive care improves survival rate and affects the incidence of abnormality among the survivors. To make an assessment of this kind, it is necessary to have some measure of intellectual development in addition to data concerning physical fitness and behavioral response. ANNOTATIONS: Ten percent of a group of 98 very low birth weight infants have some physical or medical handicap likely to affect their mode of life, detectable within the first five years of life. Only 4% of the group have definite evidence of mental handicap. These figures are based on assessment made at ages ranging from 8 months for the youngest child to over 5 years. Subdivision into those aged over or under 3 years does not make a significant difference to the prognosis. Prior to the introduction of intensive care, other studies have reported incidences of handicaps of 33-70% in very low birth weight survivors and expressed concern that if survival rates improved, the incidence of handicap might be even greater. Since the introduction of modern methods of care in University College Hospital, 10% of very low birth weight survivors have a physical or mental handicap. The incidence of mental handicap is only 4%. These results have been obtained at a time when the survival rate for infants weighing 1001-1500 grams has improved from less than 50% to over 70%. Improvements of this kind could only have been achieved if the majority of the handicaps previously observed had been acquired after birth. Furthermore, these recent re- sults show that prognosis for infants of very low birth weight is related to perinatal events rather than to prenatal factors associated with the etiology of very low birth weight. 97Stewart, Ann.. M.D. and E.O.R. Reynolds, M.D. 1974 "Improved Prognosis for Infants of Very Low Birth Weight". Pediatrics 54: 724-735. GENERAL ABSTRACT: Following the introduction of a program of intensive care for in- fants of very low birth weight, 197 infants who weighed 1,500 grams or less at birth were cared for in the Neonatal Unit of University College Hospital, London, in the five years from 1966 to 1970. ANNOTATIONS: During this period, the neonatal survival rate for infants weighing 501 to 1,000 grams was 23% and for those weighing 1,001 to 1,500 grams was 69%. The principal immediate cause of death was hypoxia around the time of birth or hyaline membrane disease. Ninety-five of the 98 surviving children, aged 2 years, 10 months to 7 years, 10 months (mean 5 years, 2 months), were followed up. They all had repeated physical examinations and developmental assessments. Sixty-five of the 86 (90.5%) of the children had no detectable handicap, 4 (4.2%) had physical handicaps only, and 5 (5.3%) had mental handicaps. The incidence of handicap was very much greater among infants presumed to have been severely hypoxic than among the remaining infants. It is concluded that intensive care can both increase the chance of survival for infants of very low birth weight and reduce the incidence of serious handicap in survivors. Swyer, Paul R., M.D. 1975 "The Organization of Perinatal Care with Particular Reference to the Newborn". Neonatology: Pathophysiology and Management of the Newborn. Edited by Gordon B. Avery, M.D., Ph.D., Philadelphia: J.B. Lippincott Company. GENERAL ABSTRACT: Swyer suggests how a systematic organization for the delivery of reproductive medical care can contribute to the success of women giving birth. Further, he suggests how to broaden the concepts of neonatology and perinatology in order to achieve a wider concept of reproductive medicine. 98ANNOTATIONS: There has been a historical change in attitude toward the newborn. In the past, health professionals and the public accepted neonatal mortality rates of the order to 100 to 200 per 1,000 births. More recently, however, most neonatal mortality rates have been much lower, and there has been greater concern for the quality of survival. The article points out that marked reductions in mortality can be achieved by coordinating rural and urban maternity services and by providing special hospital facilities for identified risk pregnancies. In addition, in countries with better neonatal and perinatal mortality statistics, there tend to be well-developed regional systems for neonatal and maternity care. In beginning to develop a regional system for caring for neonates and pregnant women, it is first important to have a standardized system for statistical evaluation of infant care or health status. Common definitions for "birth", "live birth", "stillbirth", "abortion", "neonatal period", "low birth weight", etc., and mortality recording practices would provide a firmer basis for regional, national, and international comparisons. This is especially important to have in order to accurately determine the health care needs of the populations. As much of the literature now suggests, if derangements in internal homeostasis of the pregnant mother are treated in special care high- risk units, it not only reduces mortality but prevents subsequent morbidity in survivors. Hence, having the standardized recording practices and definitions can contribute to successfully identifying high-risk cases. The need for new intensive care technology must also be provided by a central newborn intensive care facility. This type of facility is drastically improving the infant mortality rate for service populations. One recent study, according to Swyer, shows that 86.7% of 72 infants surviving birth weight of less than 1,500 grams are apparently normal and only 7.4% definitely abnormal. For example, Swyer says that survivors of artificial ventilation have a normal I.Q. compared with control groups. The majority of infants asphyxiated at birth have recovered undamaged through using modern methods of resuscitation by IPPV and intravenous alkaline buffer. Further, Swyer explains that modern techniques of resuscitation of experimentally asphyxiated animals have resulted in a high proportion of normal survivors compared with control animals. This suggests there are specific techniques of neonatal intensive care needed in order to provide optimal levels of care. For instance, a lower mortality rate was reported in low birth weight infants following the use of' intravenous alimentation, particularly in neonates with severe surgical problems. Swyer stresses that three main foci of operation should be identified in a health care system for reproductive medical care. They are as follows: Level I facilities. These facilities can be outpost nursing stations or rural district hospitals. They can take the responsibility for delivering normal pregnancies as well as pregnancy supervision and looking after normal newborn infants. They should probably operate only in relatively isolated communities. 99Level II facilities. These can be fairly large general hospitals with maternity services. They can have available specialist obstetricians and perinatologist-pediatricians and have the necessary staff and facilities to deal with the common obstetric and neonatal problems, referring only those of a complicated nature to the Level III center. Informed estimates of neonatal disease anticipate 45/1,000 live births with serious problems requiring special care, of whom perhaps less than 10/1,000 need eventual transfer to the regional Center, the remainder being adequately cared for in the community hospital ICU. Level III facilities. These can constitute the regional centers for reproductive medicine. They can be situated in major general hospitals. They can take responsibility not only for the supervision and delivery of normal pregnancies in their immediate area, but also accept a large pro- portion of the risk pregnancies from the region as well as function as the resource center for consultation with and support of physicians at Level I and II hospitals. They can offer advice and diagnostic facilities for risk pregnancies and special care facilities in both obstetrics and pediatrics for the delivery and subsequent care of the infant. The center can be responsible for coordinating, training and educational services and for conducting basic, clinical and operational research within the region. They can provide support to the Levels I and II units in the region in case of emergency, and be fully equipped with appropriate transport services to move the patient into the facility or the consultants out to the patient. Estimate of Bed Need Swyer believes that the requirement for neonatal intensive care unit beds is .75/1,000 live births. Thus, for a range of deliveries of 2,000 to 4,000 per year, the requirement of ICU beds would be 1.5 to 3; and for convalescent beds 4.2/1,000 or 8.4 to 16.8 beds. If a minority of the more severe or special problems are transferred to the regional center as suggested, this number can be diminished by approximately 20%. For a delivery rate of 2,000 per year, the above considerations suggest a patient load of approximately 60 to 80 neonatal ICU patients a year. In addition, experience suggests that approximately 200/1,000 live births can advantageously spend up to 24 hours postnatally in a special observation nursery. Necessary Ancillary Services Laboratory services should be organized within the regional center or provide specialized tests for the service of community and district hospitals. Essential services include the genetic, cytologic, chemical and spectrophotometric analysis of amniotic fluid and estriol determination. The blood bank at the regional center should also be well equipped to handle referral problems. It can provide a typing laboratory and depot for the storage of donor blood. Delivery of mothers in hospitals that do not carry donor blood is not advised, according to Swyer. At least one unit of 0 Rh-negative blood should be kept in each community birth facility. The facility can arrange to have replacement blood supplies cycled to them from the regional center within 72 hours. 100The regional center is the logical place to locate the majority of the transport services for the system. These services might include care to bring patients to and from clinics, ambulances and flying vehicles with adequate head room and services for monitoring and life-support care. A comprehensively developed transport system can also provide mobile units for carrying public health personnel into the community for the purpose of delivering maternal and child health care, preventive medicine, and educational programs. Swyer points out that there is an inverse relationship between the number of prenatal examinations and the perinatal mortality and morbidity. In other words, the more neglect in educating women about pregnancy, the greater will be the likelihood for death of the baby or that some develop- ment problem will occur. Hence, the regional center should encourage a sustained effort to instruct the public in sex education, family planning, genetics, antenatal, natal and postnatal care. The team concept of health care delivery can ensure that both mother and child receive optimal care from a variety of medical and paramedical personnel. Appropriate functioning of the personnel organization is facilitated if established lines of communication and patterns of referral are developed. Finally, because the patient's interest should always be the first priority, prenatal risk records or registers for the mother and postnatal records for the infant can be maintained at the regional center. These can be used as tools to ensure that risk patients are identified and pro- vided with care which is appropriate for their needs. By keeping in mind that the patients' needs come first, factional and jurisdictional conflicts may be resolved with fewer conflicts. Work Volume Note Dr. Swyer and Dr. Hardie have recommended that approximately 200 intensive care admissions annually is a reasonable workload for one full- time Specialist Perinatologist assuming time for attendance at prenatal clinics, follow-up clinics, research and teaching. Swyer, Paul R., M.D. 1970 "The Regional Organization of Special Care for the Neonate". Pediatric Clinics of North America 17: 761-776. GENERAL ABSTRACT: Swyer's discussion emphasizes the pediatric aspects of regional plan- ning for optimal neonatal care of high-risk infants. However, such planning must be integrated with obstetrics and other disciplines to deliver total interconceptual, antenatal, natal and postnatal care. 101ANNOTATIONS: The Ontario Perinatal Study (1967) showed that 32% of pregnancies had some broadly defined identifiable risk factor and generated 60% of the neonatal problems. Forty percent of the neonatal problems were unheralded and emergent, though modern techniques have somewhat reduced this proportion. The decision to transfer a patient from a community hospital depends on four criteria: (1) the nature of severity of the patient's criteria; (2) the relative capabilities of the delivery and referral centers; (3) the type of transport facility available and the distances involved; and (4) the climatic conditions. Bed Requirements for Regional Neonatal Centers The mortality rate in the NICU is about one-third of all admissions. The potential admissions to an NICU would be the regional neonatal mortality rate (per 1,000 live births) X 3/1,000 live births, and the requirement for NICU beds would be: regional neonatal mortality rate X 3 _ n . , . ,, no. of live births in ------------------------------------- X thousands for the region Only about half of all admissions to a neonatal referral unit require the highest grade of intensive care; provision should be made for the remaining infants at a somewhat lower, but still relatively advanced level of care. In addition, patients recovering from NIC will require transitional and convalescent care. It had been found that six transitional and convalescent care beds are required for each NICU bed. Methods for Measuring Fulfillment of Objectives • Demonstration of ability to correct clinical abnormalities, such as a low PH or hypocalcemia, and to treat effectively asphyxial respiratory failure. • Controlled trials of techniques or procedures using clearly defined end points such as survival. • Long-term assessment of the growth, development, and mortality of survivors. • Demonstration of a sequential improvement in the overall mortality rate. • A comprehensive medical audit or morbidity and mortality should be compared with other regional, national, and international indices. 102Cost Care in the NICU at the Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto (1970) costs approximately $200 per patient day. Since the average stay in the NICU is 6 days, the cost is roughly $1,200 per patient admitted. This figure excludes care in transitional and convalescent areas which costs about $100 per patient day or an average cost of $2,000 for 20 days so that the average total cost for a patient is $3,200. Teberg, Annabel, M.D., Joan E. Hodgman, M.D., Paul Y.K. Wu, M.D. and Robert L. Spears, M.D. 1977 "Recent Improvement in Outcome for the Small Premature Infant: Follow- up of Infants with a Birth Weight of Less Than 1,500 Grams". Clinical Pediatrics 16: 307-313. GENERAL ABSTRACT: The authors describe their experience with 176 infants cared for in the Special Care Nurseries of the Los Angeles County-USC Medical Center and followed in the Medical Center's Premature Clinic. Data was analyzed according to birth weights of under 1,000 grams and between 1,000 and 1,500 grams. Demographic factors are examined. Neurologic and developmental outcomes were assessed during the follow-up visits at the Premature Clinic. ANNOTATIONS: Advances in perinatal care correlate with improved developmental and neurologic outcomes in the infants. Developmental and neurologic outcome was determined for 176 premature infants of birth weight less than 1,500 grams, born during 1965-1970. No significant difference in outcome was found when infants of birth weight 1,000 to 1,500 grams were compared with those weighing less than 1,000 grams. The overall outcome is generally favorable, with 67% of the entire group now deemed developmentally and neurologically normal. Improvement in outcome in the small premature infant seems related to aggressive perinatal care, particularly monitoring of biophysical, biochemical and metabolic factors in the fetus and neonate. 103Thogmartin, Bruce and Michael Tyne 1969 "Essential Design Elements of Neonatal Intensive Care Unit". Problems of Neonatal Intensive Care Centers. Edited by Ross Hospital Planning Associates, Ross Laboratories: Columbus, Ohio. GENERAL ABSTRACT: This is a planning document used to assist planners, administrators or physicians in designing a NICU. ANNOTATIONS: Environment A stabilized room environment is necessary. A temperature of 74-76 degrees F. and a relative humidity of 50% is deemed most favorable. Incoming clean air should pass through medium to high efficiency filters immediately prior to being introduced into the nursery with room air changed 12 or more times per hour. A positive pressure (outward flow of air) with adjacent areas should be maintained to reduce the possibility of germ-laden dust entering the area. Ancillary Space and Functions • Procedure Room Designing a maximal care unit takes into consideration the fact that most diagnostic and treatment procedures are per- formed at an individual incubator location, precluding the need to remove a sick neonate from its stabilized environment. Where a separate procedure room is required, it should adjoin a maximal care unit. • Clerical Center Though most charting activities take place at a patient's location, a distinct area should be designated as a clerical center, primarily for a ward se’cretary or unit clerk. Here, requisitions may be initiated and telephone and intercom communications handled. • Clean and Soiled Utility Rooms Separate rooms, contiguous to a maximal care unit for clean and soiled utility functions are needed. Base and wall cabinetry and built-in sinks are appropriate in each room. Ideally, the utility room has dual access to speed outward flow of supplies. 104Storage Two storage requirements need to be considered: a. In-unit storage of routine and special infant care supplies. b. Storage of idle equipment. • Laboratory Most maximal care units include a micro-laboratory capable of blood gas and bilirubin determinations. Countertop work space and some storage are required. A micro-laboratory is sometimes combined with a procedure room or utility area. Additional space programmed at the start will provide for expanding tests. • X-Ray A portable x-ray unit, assigned exclusively to the nurseries, will usually satisfy the maximal care unit requirements. A separate NICU x-ray center is also a possible consideration. Thompson, Theodore, M.D. and J. Reynolds 1977 "The Results of Intensive Care Therapy for Neonates: I. Overall Neonatal Mortality Rates; II. Neonatal Mortality Rates and Long-Term Prognosis for Low Birth Rate Neonates". Journal of Perinatal Medicine 5: 59-75. GENERAL ABSTRACT: This paper is divided into two sections. The first reviews the evidence on neonatal intensive care units' impact upon neonatal mortality rates among low birth weight infants. The second examines whether improve- ments in the care of sick neonates have decreased the incidence of long- term sequelae among neonatal intensive care unit survivors. ANNOTATIONS: The first section presents data which documents the improvements in neonatal survival with the utilization of NICUs by comparing overall neonatal mortality rates before and after the introduction of NICUs in hospitals and the development of regionalized NICUs. Data comparing low birth weight neonatal mortality rates for various areas are presented. The greatly improved survival rates for low birth weight infants have been a major factor in reduced neonatal mortality rates. Current survival overall rates approach 75% to 95% for LBW infants managed within NICUs. Survival rates exceed 75% for neonates weighing between 1001-1501 grams who have received intensive care. 105Survival rates for AGA infants weighing under 1001 grams at birth have improved and are currently below 30%. The second section examines the long-term prognosis for LBW infants. There has been a reduction of the incidence of disabilities among LBW survivors. The majority of survivors do not have defects requiring institutional care and the minor defects do not often preclude a useful life. Neonatal intensive care has been responsible for improved physical and developmental status for survivors. Measures responsible for pre- venting death also prevent central nervous system damage. Physicians are more knowledgeable of the antenatal and perinatal factors con- tributing to mortality and morbidity of the fetus and the neonate and have enhanced to prevent or correct detrimental conditions. The article reviews the findings of the Maternal and Child Health Task Force of the State Health Planning Advisory Council in Michigan on the effectiveness of intensive care in reducing long-term morbidity for neonates. Fifty to 70% of the cases of severe mental retardation due to perinatal factors could be prevented, resulting in a 20% to 30% reduction of children with severe mental retardation. Improved social, educational and economic conditions would decrease neonatal mortality and morbidity rates by reducing the incidence of LBW infants, particularly those weighing under 1,500 grams. However, since most premature deliveries currently cannot be prevented, one immediate method of further reducing both neonatal mortality rates and long-term physical and developmental sequelae among LBW infants is to make available optimal care to the fetus during the prenatal and peri- partum periods and to the LBW neonate, the latter in NICUs where bio- chemical, metabolic, and physiologic disturbances can be anticipated and prevented or at least promptly detected and treated. The provision of optimal perinatal care requires that high-risk pregnant women, particularly those in premature labor under 33-34 weeks gestation, be transferred to a high-risk perinatal center for delivery so that the LBW infant can be assured optimal care from birth. The least traumatic and most dependable transport incubator remains the pregnant woman's uterus. Usher, Robert H., M.D. 1971 "Clinical Implications of Perinatal Mortality Statistics". Perinatal Biology. Leo Stern, M.D. (guest editor). Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology 14: 885-925. GENERAL ABSTRACT: Usher presents a discussion of perinatal mortality which deals with three aspects. Background factors in the social and maternal history on which differences in medical care are superimposed are 106briefly reviewed from data made available from the British Perinatal Mortality Study. The current status of perinatal mortality across a wide geographic area is analyzed using data obtained from the Perinatal Mortality Committee of the Province of Quebec, Canada. Finally, the recent perinatal mortality experience of a university teaching maternity hospital which has been active in the development of neonatal intensive care is presented to indicate the results currently obtainable under optimal circumstances of perinatal care. ANNOTATIONS: Data Gathering Standards In order to obtain accurate and meaningful perinatal mortality statistics, a firm definition of viability must be established based upon birth weight. All stillbirths and first-week neonatal deaths of infants delivered in an institution must be included, and neonatal deaths must be attributed to the hospital of birth, irrespective of where the infants die. Neonatal death rates must be analyzed separately for each weight group. Stillbirths and neonatal deaths must be analyzed by cause. Completeness of reporting, standardized definitions of causes of death, and accuracy in weighing infants and assigning causes of death are pre- requisite to obtaining useful figures. Clarifying Differences Between Neonatal Mortality Rates Across Racial Lines May Be Helpful for Refining Our Definitions of High-Risk Births Neonatal mortality rates should be grouped by weight group. It has been suspected that low birth weight black infants are stronger than their similar-weight white counterparts. Figures which show this trend have been collected by Dr. Malcolm Freeman at the Grady Memorial Hospital, Atlanta, Georgia. This hospital delivers some 7,000 infants per year from an indigent population which has a low birth weight incidence of 13.2% among white patients and 15.4% among its black patients (1971). White infants of low birth weight, for each 500 grams weight group, had neonatal mortality rates 27, 80 and 102% higher than black infants of similar weight. Low birth weight infants (1001-2500 grams) as a total group had neonatal mortality rates of 123 per 1,000 among whites and 72 per 1,000 among black infants treated with the same,neonatal care. (Statistics for each weight group are provided within the article.) Therefore, it may be suggestible for planners to analyze differences in neonatal mortality rates for different racial groups. Differences Between Neonatal Mortality Rates, Maternity Hospitals That Utilize NICU vs. Facilities Without Special NICU Figures indicate that perinatal mortality, when region and size of hospital are held constant, is 33% higher in maternity hospitals that do 107not utilize intensive care facilities than in those with intramural facilities. It was calculated that all infants delivered in the Province (Quebec) during 1967 and 1968 have been delivered in hospitals containing neonatal intensive care facilities, 774 of the 2,045 first-week deaths that occurred could have been prevented. Potentially Preventable Deaths According to statistics in the article, the "Irreducible Minimum", perinatal mortality rate over 1,000 grams would consist of the following: inoperable lethal malformation (3.3 per 1,000); asphyxic fetal deaths prior to admission to hospital from abruptio placentia (0.8), or cord loops (1.1); deaths before 32 weeks' gestation from erthroblastosis (0.8); maternal diabetes or toxemia (0.3); and unexplained stillbirths prior to labor (2.7). The total irreducible minimum perinatal mortality rate is 9.0 per 1,000. Maintaining Mortality Rate Standards, A Reflection of Quality The statistics which most closely reflect adequacy of perinatal care are the following, with rates from an intensive care center indicated as standards: • Total Mortality •• Perinatal mortality over 1000 g •• Neonatal mortality: 1001-2500 g over 2500 g Total over 1000 g •• Stillbirth rate over 1000 g, total— in labor— • Mortality By Cause •• Deaths from Respiratory Distress Syndrome Asphyxia Fetal Malnutrition Isoimmunization Unexplained Cause 15.9 per 1,000 births 55.8 2.5 6.3 9.7 2.8 1.2 per 1,000 births 5.3 1.1 0.8 2.8 If all deaths from potentially treatable causes could be prevented, perinatal mortality over 1,000 grams would be reduced to 9.0 per 1,000 births. 108Usher, Robert, M.D. 1977 "Changing Mortality Rates With Perinatal Intensive Care and Regionalization". Seminars in Perinatology: Regionalization of Perinatal Care 1: 309-319. Guest Editor: Leo Stern, M.D. New York: Grune and Stratton. GENERAL ABSTRACT: The author reviewed perinatal mortality data by weight group from three sources: (1) the Province of Quebec (1961-1974); (2) the obstetrical services associated with McGill University; and (3) the Royal Victoria Hospital, a perinatal referral center in Quebec. Infants weighing 1,000 grams or less were excluded from the analysis because: deaths are mainly unavoidable and usually the result of immaturity; often go unreported as stillbirths; or are inaccurately reported. As mortality rates among infants weighing more than 1,000 grams have decreased, those born with lower birth weights (0.5%) create a disproportionate influence in perinatal mortality statistics and de- tract from their usefulness in reflecting the adequacy of perinatal care. The minimum perinatal mortality from causes that are not yet potentially preventable can be calculated to be 5.6/1,000. Analysis of perinatal mortality statistics provides a sensitive measure of quality of obstetric and neonatal care. Regionalized perinatal intensive care can markedly reduce perinatal mortality. The challenge for the future is to make intensive care services available to all pregnant women and newborn infants at risk. An effective monitoring system for perinatal deaths is a prerequisite to assure that optimum obstetric and neonatal intensive care is being provided to those in need. ANNOTATIONS: Province of Quebec • There was a 41% decrease in perinatal mortality of infants of greater than 1,000 grams birth weight, to a rate of 13.1/1,000. This was due to a 39% decrease in the stillbirth rate to 7.0/1,000 and a 43% drop in neonatal mortality to 6.1/1,000. This still left the Province higher than the optimal rate of 9.7/1,000 that obtained in the best third of the larger obstetric services. • The 43% decrease in neonatal mortality was mostly due to de- creased mortality rates within weight groups rather than to de- creased incidence of low birth weight infants. Within each 500 gram weight group (from 1,001 to 2,500 grams), there was a 32%-53% decrease in neonatal mortality from 1968 to 1974, the greatest improvement being in the 2,001-2,500 gram weight group. Among full-size infants (over 2,500 grams), neonatal mortality fell by 31% between 1968 and 1974 and by 42% between 1967 and 1974. 109• "Optimal" neonatal mortality rates are below the provincial rates for the 1,001-1,500 gram infants indicating that most improvement can be sought in future by provision of modern methods of care to the few very small infants (under 1,500 grams, 0.8% of live births) by regionalizing deliveries that occur very prematurely (1,500 grams is equivalent to 30-31 weeks of gestation). Regionalization of Obstetric Services Associated With McGill University • There has been a decrease in perinatal mortality coincident with the regionalization of McGill-associated obstetric services in 1973. After a plateau period of five years with perinatal mortality averaging 14.0/1,000 from 1968 through 1972 (prior to regionalization), mortality fell to an average of 10.1/1,000 between 1973 and 1975, with a further decrease to 8.2/1,000 in 1976. The decrease in mortality rates cannot be attributed to a change in incidence of low birth weight infants. • After regionalization, there was a 34% decrease in neonatal mortality from 5.3 to 3.5/1,000 between 1972 and 1974, compared to a fall in provincial rates from 7.7 to 6.1/1,000 in the same period. This decrease occurred during, and was in part related to, the development of antenatal referral of women in premature labor for delivery in the perinatal intensive care center at the Royal Victoria Hospital. The greatest emphasis in this program was placed in the referral of pregnancies threatening to deliver very prematurely. The greatest benefit was obtained among infants of very low birth weight. Regionalization with antenatal referral of high-risk pregnancies cannot be held to be responsible for all of the improvement in neonatal mortality rates in the McGill Hospitals. Much credit must be given to developments in the technology of neonatal intensive care. • Analysis of 1972 and 1973 data showed regional differences in perinatal mortality between the large metropolitan Montreal region (13.9/1,000), the smaller metropolitan Quebec City region (15.9/1,000), and the remaining regions of the province lacking large cities (17.4/1,000). These differences could not be related to population differences in maternal characteristics or incidence of low birth weight infants or of malformations. This difference in mortality between Montreal and the non-metropolitan regions was primarily due to neonatal mortality in low birth weight infants (52/1,000 versus 93/1,000). Stillbirth rates were very similar (7.9 versus 8.3/1,000). 110• An analysis of the 0-7 day neonatal mortality rate in 1974 for very low birth weight infants according to the type of hospital in which the infants were delivered. Hospitals providing neonatal intensive care facilities in the hospital of birth, or "intramural" services, had a neonatal mortality rate for infants weighing 1,001-1,500 grams of 15%. Hospitals that systematically trans- ferred such infants to pediatric referral centers had a mortality rate of 25%. Those that provided neither intramural nor post- natal referral neonatal intensive care lost 48% of their 1,001- 1,500 gram infants. These comparisons were made among each of the 34 large hospital services delivering more than 1,000 infants per year. Smaller hospitals, some of which referred their infants postnatally for intensive care, had a 43% mortality rate. Together, these four types of hospitals gave the province, as a whole, a 36% mortality rate for this weight group. • From these data, it can be concluded that if all 428 infants weighing 1,001-1,500 grams who were delivered in the province in 1974 could have been delivered in hospitals providing intra- mural neonatal intensive care, 92 (59%) of the 156 deaths in this weight group alone could have been avoided. • The potential for preventing neonatal deaths with antenatal transfer of very few high-risk pregnancies is, therefore, great since the 0.5% of live births weighing 1,001-1,500 grams accounted for 30% of the province's> 1,000 grams neonatal deaths in 1974. Changing Mortality Rates in a Perinatal Center • Causes of death have changed over the 1966-1975 decade. This is to be expected from the nature of advances in therapy. In all, there was a decrease in the frequency of the "potentially pre- ventable" causes of death for two periods selected for comparison: 1966-1970 (76.1/10,000) and 1971-1975 (40.1/10,000). This de- crease could in most instances have been related to developments in prevention or treatment of perinatal diseases instituted during the period under study. •• Asphyxia During Labor and Delivery Whether due to mechanical abnormalities or to unexplained cause, they are preventable with modern monitoring techniques. These two causes of death should ultimately be completely preventable. •• Maternal Diabetes or Toxemia of Pregnancy These were rarely associated with otherwise unexplained stillbirths, with rates of 4.5/10,000 in the first period and 4.2/10,000 in the second for the two conditions together. IllFetal Malnutrition Deaths of growth-retarded infants from chronic fetal depriva- tion were reduced in frequency from 11.3 to 7.6/10,000 with the aid of ultrasound, oxytocin challenge tests and monitoring during labor. Neonatal deaths from this cause were eliminated completely by improved obstetric care. •• Respiratory Distress Syndrome This decreased in frequency as a cause of death from 12.1 to 8.5/10,000. Comparing 1970-1975 births before and after steroids, the mortality rate fell from 12 to 4/10,000 following the introduction of steroid prophylaxis in mid-1973. This was due to a decrease in incidence rather than to improvement in therapy. It seems likely that with the aid of corticosteroids the toll from respiratory distress syndrome can be reduced by two-thirds to about 4/10,000 live births. •• Isoimmunization Deaths These deaths dropped from 8.3/10,000 births to zero due to immunoglobulin prophylaxis rather than to better therapy. •• Infections Infection killed 9.8 infants per 10,000 in the first period and only 1.8/10,000 in the second. Most infections in the first period, and both cases in the second, were intra- uterine in origin. • Certain causes of death are usually not potentially preventable. These include from lethal malformations, most from antepartum hemorrhage (usually abruptio placenta, with fetal death occurring before arrival of the mother in hospital), most stillbirths from cord loops or knots (again, with fetal death usually occurring before hospitalization of the mother), and all unexplained antepartum stillbirths, where an apparently normal fetus of normal size dies unexpectedly, prior to admission of a healthy mother to hospital. Together these accounted for 55.5 deaths per 10,000 births in 1971-1975, which can be considered as the "minimum possible perinatal mortality rate" if all potentially preventable perinatal deaths could have been avoided. This minimum comprises 17.8 neonatal deaths and 37.4 stillbirths per 10,000. 112Westbers, Jimmie A., M.D., Dayton W. Clark, M.D. and Gilbert A. Webb, M.D. 1973 "An Evaluation of High-Risk Maternity Care in a Community Hospital". American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 116: 557-563. GENERAL ABSTRACT: A program of high-risk maternity care was established in 1967 at Children's Hospital and Adult Medical Center of San Francisco. This is a 363 bed community hospital with approximately 2,000 births per year. ANNOTATIONS: The following goals for planning regional systems for the provisions of neonatal care are reiterations of statements which have been made throughout the literature: • Every high-risk pregnancy should be treated at a high-risk hospital center. • If the high-risk patient cannot be adequately identified in advance, there are two solutions. One way is to establish regional high-risk centers to which those patients obviously at high-risk will be referred at an early date and to which patients with sudden complications can be quickly transferred. A second solution is to upgrade as many maternity and nursery units as possible to a high-risk level of care, thus avoiding the necessity of the transfer of sick patients except from those areas where the population density will not support the expense of intensive maternal and newborn care. • Finally, wherever it is possible to consolidate obstetric services in a fewer number of hospitals to create network high-risk units, this should be a high priority. Zamansky, Harriet and Kathleen Strobel 1976 "Care of the Critically 111 Newborn in An Infant Care Center". American Journal of Nursing 76: 566-568. GENERAL ABSTRACT: This article describes the operations of the Infant Care Center at the Queen of Valley Hospital, West Covina, California. It offers a clear, 113understandable treatment of typical NICU activities and would be valuable as background material for committees. It describes infants cared for and the levels of care provided. ANNOTATIONS: The categories of infants are cared for in the ICC unit: • all those weighing less than 1,500 grams at birth • premature or full-term infants with respiratory distress • infants with surgical conditions requiring immediate treatment • infants with neonatal sepsis, erythroblastosis, or other causes of jaundice requiring transfusion • infants with neonatal seizures. The infant receiving critical care: • needs mechanical respirator assistance • has an endotracheal tube or tracheostomy • requires oxygen with respirator assistance greater than 50% • has indwelling umbilical catheters • is on monitors for vital signs • must have his intake and output strictly measured • needs care on a one-nurse to one-infant ratio. This area is closed to admissions when the census is four. The infant receiving intensive care: • has returned from surgery • has chest tubes • requires high oxygen concentration without respirator assistance • has an indwelling arterial or venous catheter for frequent blood gases and IV therapy • needs hyperalimentation • needs care on a one-nurse to two-infant ratio. For intermediate care, the infant: • needs oxygen greater than 30% • has peripheral intravenous infusions • must be on isolation for possible sepsis or infectious disease • needs vital signs monitored every two to three hours • needs gavage feedings • needs care on a one-nurse to four-infant ratio. For observational care, the infant: • needs to be fed every three to four hours • needs to be observed for weight gain • needs vital signs monitored every four hours • needs care on a one-nurse to six-infant ratio. 114CHAPTER 2 HEALTH PLANNING LITERATUREBergen-Passaic Health Systems Agency 1977 Report on the Task-Force on Regional Perinatal Services in the Bergen-Passaic Health Service Area to the Project Review Committee. Rochelle Park, N.J. GENERAL ABSTRACT; On March 31, 1976, the Bergen-Passaic HSA received a Certificate of Need (CON) application from St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center in Patterson, Passaic County, New Jersey, to be designated as the Regional Perinatal Center for the Bergen-Passaic health service area. This report describes the chronology of events and the decision-making constituting the planning process which the HSA embarked upon to formally evaluate the St. Joseph's application. It details the task force meetings, the use of the medical and financial con- sultants, and the HSA's staff activities as they interacted and enabled appropri- ate planning decisions to be made. ANNOTATIONS: Generally, this report is very good for the purpose of examining the case- oriented approach to planning a Level III Perinatal Center. Although many of the elements of the document are too detailed to explain here, the application lists the following as some of the components of service which the hospital plans to perform. • Identification of patients at-risk during their pregnancy. • Provision of antepartum diagnostic techniques and consultative advice. • Increase intrapartum surveillance and provide an interpretive facility available on a twenty-four hour basis. • Intensified neonatal care for normal newborns who unexpectedly develop problems and sick newborns anticipated to develop problems. • Development of a means to collect and analyze perinatal data. • Formal education programs for the public and nursing and physician personnel based on the experience of the area. • An "Open Staff" in order to develop a qualified regional staff that will utilize the Hospital when problems arise with a pregnant patient or newborn infant. Qualified physicians will be able to admit and follow their patients in the hospital. Finally, an effective method for evaluating the quality of delivery in a Level III center should always be an integral part of its operation. In the St. Joseph's plan, daily rounds are conducted in the antenatal unit 116and the labor-delivery suite as well as in the neonatal intensive care and regular newborn nurseries. Interdisciplinary conferences are held on a regular basis along with quarterly perinatal morbidity and mortality con- ferences which are open to all members of the perinatal team. Hence, a similar method for continual evaluation should be standard. The Task Force Report includes a background report on regionalization of perinatal services, a discussion of the Task Force process, the HSA staff's need assessment analysis, a report from the site visit and Task Force Recommendations. Appendices include St. Joseph's CON application, the HSA's staff summary, "Levels of Care Criteria for the Regionalization of Maternal and Neonatal Services in New Jersey" (New Jersey State Dept, of Health), Perinatal Task Force and Review Committee meeting minutes, correspondence from consul- tants, additional material submitted by the hospital and a pre-site visit questionnaire. Blackmon, Lillian, M.D. and Audrey K. Brown, M.D. 1973 Recommended Standards for Hospital Nursery Services: Plan for a Statewide System of High-Risk Newborn Care. Atlanta, GA: Georgia Regional Medical Program. GENERAL ABSTRACT: A central point of this paper is that in organizing a statewide network of centers for care of the high-risk newborn, it is necessary to depart from the single hospital concept. All hospitals with facilities for delivery do not also have facilities for care of the high-risk newborn, nor is it reasonable to plan that they will develop such facilities because of limited resources or limited potential patient population. Recommendations for the organization and operation of the various units in the three hospital cate- gories are presented in the paper. The thrust is toward the best possible circumstances and not the minimally acceptable. ANNOTATIONS: Primary Hospital • Personnel Requirements The number of patient care personnel should be calculated on the basis of capacity as well as usual census, and on the age from birth of the infants. For infants of less than 24 hours, the staff: patient ratio is 1:4-6 and for infants of greater than 24 hours, 1:6-8. At least one R.N. should be present on each shift. They should be assigned to the nursery area permanently and not serve as substitutes in other units in the hospital except in a rare and urgent situation. Clerical and housekeeping personnel should also 117be assigned as needed to free the professional nurse for patient care duties. • Space Standards Admission Area — 30 square feet per patient station. Special Procedures Area — 30 square feet. Normal Newborn — 20 square feet per patient station. Secondary Hospital • Nursery Service The nursery service of the Secondary Hospital shall be a distinct unit in hospital organization, nursing administration, and medical staff responsibility. It shall consist of at least two separate parts: the Normal Newborn Nursery and the Intermediate and Special Care Units. A committee of physicians appointed by the medical staff shall have the responsibility for reviewing the operation of the nursery service and establishing routine policies and procedures. • Personnel Requirements In the Normal Newborn Nursery the staff: patient ratio is 1:4-6. At least one R.N. should be present on each shift. Her work assignment should be such that she is free to observe each new baby admitted. The remaining staff may be composed of aides and/or L.P.N.s. In the Intermediate Care Unit, one R.N. should be assigned as a supervisory person for each ten patients on each shift. She may also have patient care responsibilities. The remaining staff shall be composed of aides and L.P.N.s at a ratio of 1:3-4 personnel to patients. R.N.s should be assigned for patient care in the Special Care Unit as a nurse to patient ratio of 1:2. They should be freed from all non-patient care duties. Assignment to the Intermediate and Special Care staff should be considered permanent and members of the staff should not be utilized as substitutes in other hospital areas except in a rare and urgent situation. • Space Standards •• Intermediate Care 30-40 square feet per patient station Mothering Area — 80-100 square feet •• Special Care 60-80 square feet per patient station Special Procedure Area — 80-100 square feet 118Tertiary Hospitals • Personnel Requirements The patient population of the Special (Intensive) Care Unit shall consist of infants at greatest risk for morbidity and mortality and thus shall require the highest level of nursing skill and time. R.N.s should be assigned at a nurse to patient ratio of 1:1-2 according to the patient care demands. They should be freed of all other duties when assigned to patient care. Requirements for other care units remain the same as for secondary hospitals. • Space Standards Intermediate Care — 30-40 square feet per patient station. Mothering Area — 80-100 square feet. Special (Intensive) Care — 60-80 square feet per patient station. Special Procedure Area — 100-150 square feet. Special Capabilities (Secondary and Tertiary Hospitals) • Secondary Hospital A pediatrician with special interest and training in neonatalogy is essential for both administrative and patient care reasons in the Secondary Hospital. A part-time hospital employed pediatri cian-neonatologist is desirable. • Tertiary Hospital A full-time neonatologist and a pediatric surgeon are essential. A suggested clustering of other sub-specialists is: Pediatric Cardiologist Pediatric Hemotologist Pediatric Radiologist Pediatric Pathologist Pediatric Neurologist Limited to a few specializing centers: Thoracic and Cardiac Surgeon Pediatric Urologist Orthopedic Surgeon Plastic Surgeon Neurosurgeon Pediatric Anesthesiologist Opthalmologist Professional Skills The physician who assumes responsibility for resuscitation of the new born should be skilled in all aspects of managing the depressed newborn at birth. The following are essentail skills: • Laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation of all size newborns 119• Trachial suctioning • External cardiac massage • Bag-to-tube and bag-to-mask assisted ventilation • Umbilical vein catheterization • Administration of appropriate drugs, dosage and route Nursing Skills for resuscitation of the newborn include: • Oropharyngeal and nasopharyngeal suctioning with catheter • Bag-and-mask assisted ventilation • External cardiac massage • Administration of appropriate drugs, dosage and route Comprehensive Health Planning of Northwest Illinois. 1977 Planning Policies for Perinatal High Risk. Rockford, IL. GENERAL ABSTRACT: This reference is a chapter from the third edition of the CHP of North- west Illinois' Planning Policies document. It articulates the agencies' policies for Perinatal/High Risk Services on: service and determination, affiliation agreements, consolidation, levels of care, communications, educational networks, faculty liaison relationships, staffing and bed addi- tions and bed need determination. ANNOTATIONS: Accessibility Inaccessibility for NICU systems denotes conditions in a defined area for provision of perinatal/high-risk services are or will be lacking as evidenced by such quantifiable factors which adversely affect care and the health status of the area as follows: (a) unfavorable infant mortality rate and other health status indices, (b) size of indigent population, (c) non- availability of physician or hospital care for the poor, (d) socio-economic barriers to care, (e) unfavorable time and" distance factors to nearest physician and/or hospital resource accessbile and acceptable to this popula- tion. Staffing When a NICU project is proposed by a planning agency the plan must show documentation of the availability and numbers of staffing to include but not be limited to the following personnel possessing the proper credentials: • Neonatalogists. • Obstetrician — a physician certified by the American Board of Obstetrics and Gynecology and who specializes in high risk maternal care. 120• Pediatrician — a physician certified by the American Board of Pediatrics. • Nurses — including a person with an advanced degree in obstetric or newborn nursing qualified to be a designated Clinical Nurse Specialist if that person is the unit's nursing service supervisor. • Administrative Director — a physician who may be a neonatologist with extensive training and experience in perinatal medicine and in administration of health services. Bed Need To determine bed need in an area the procedure is as follows: • Determine the number of live births in the area. • Multiply the number of live births by .10 to determine the number of neonates requiring intensive and/or intermediate care. (A standard estimate is that 10% of all live births will require intensive and/or intermediate perinatal care.) • Multiply the number of neonates by 15 (length of stay) to determine the projected patient day total. • Divide the projected patient day total by 365 (days) to determine the average daily census. • Divide the average daily census by an 85% optimum occupancy figure to determine the bed need in an area. Comprehensive Health Planning Agency of Southeastern Wisconsin, Inc. 1976 Guidelines for Perinatal Services. Milwaukee, WI. GENERAL ABSTRACT: This is an outline or guide for the development of perinatal services within a comprehensive, quality system. It presents explanations of the purpose for perinatal and neonatal care systems, rationale for systemization, and various designations of responsibility in a regional system. Standards for transferring newborn cases with the system are presented. ANNOTATIONS: Every attempt should be made to transport certain high-risk cases to a facility able to meet all their needs. If it seems necessary to treat the 121patient at an intensive care center, the patient should be transferred directly to a Regional Intensive Care Center without stop at a Perinatal Center. In order to maintain continuity of care it is essential to establish a coordinated program for continued participation of the referring physician in the care of the partient. The following list is standard for the decision to transfer a case to the Regional Intensive Care Center: • Gestation of less than 32 weeks; birth weight less than 1,500 grams or 3 lbs. 6 oz. • Respiratory distress and metabolic acidosis persisting after 2 hours of age or requiring ambient oxygen in excess of 40% after 2 hours of age. • Infant of a diabetic mother. • Neonatal seizures. • Suspected neonatal sepsis and/or meningitis. • Congenital anomalies requiring observation for neonatal surgery. • Meconium aspiration. The following is a listing of complications of pregnancy and may suggest consultation and possible transfer of the mother. Previous History: • Two or more previous premature labors of history of low birth weight infants (less than 2,500 grams). • Excessively large infants (greater than 4,000 grams). • Previous caesarean section. • Previous significant dystocia. • Two or more previous abortions. Federal Register 1978 National Guidelines for Health Planning: Neonatal Special Care Centers 43 (March 28), Section 121.204: 13040-13050. GENERAL ABSTRACT: • Neonatal services should be planned on a regional basis with linkages with obstetrical services. • The total number of neonatal intensive and intermediate care beds should not exceed 4 per 1,000 live births per year in a defined neonatal service area. An ajustment upward may be justified when the rate of high-risk pregnancies is unusually high, based on analyses by the HSA. • A single neonatal special care unit (Level II or III) should contain a minimum of 15 beds. An adjustment downward may be justified for a Level II unit when travel time to an alternate unit is a serious hardship due to geographic remoteness, based on analyses by the HSA. 122ANNOTATIONS: For this standard, the Department has adopted the widely endorsed concept of regionalization, involving various levels of care. Under this concept, Level III units are staffed and equipped for the intensive care of newborns as well as intermediate and recovery care. Level II units provide intermediate and recovery care as well as some specialized services. Level I units provide recovery care. Neonatal, special care is a highly specialized service required by only a very small percentage of infants. The Department believes that four neonatal special care beds for intensive and intermediate care per 1,000 live births will usually be adequate to meet the needs, taking into account the incidence of high risk pregnancies, the percentage of live births re- quiring intensive care, and the average length of stay. ("Bed" includes incubators or other heated units for specialized care, and bassinettes.) In addition, the Department has established a minimum of 15 beds per unit for Levels II and III as the minimum number necessary to support economical operation for these services. Both standards are supported and recommended by the American Academy of Pediatrics. The American Academy of Pediatrics has noted that "the best care will be given to high risk and seriously ill neonates if intensive care units are developed in a few adequately qualified institutions within a community rather than within many hospitals. Properly conducted, early transfer of these infants to a qualified unit provides better care than do attempts to maintain them in inadequate units". This regionalized approach is re- flected in the minimum size standard which is designed to foster the loca- tion of specialized units in medical centers which have available special staff, equipment, and consultative services and facilities. Since perinatal centers which include neonatal units will serve the patient load resulting from a representative population of more than one million, a defined neonatal service area should be identified by the rele- vant HSAs in conjunction with the State Agency. Special attention should also be given to ensure adequate communication and transportation systems, including joint transfers of mother and child and maintenance of family contact. Hospitals with such units should have agreements with other facili- ties to serve referred patients. The regional plan should include a struc- tured ongoing system of review, including assessment of changes in health status indicators. Florida Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services, Children's Medical Services 1977 Statewide Program for Perinatal Intensive Care Centers: Obstetrical Com- ponent. Tallahassee, FL. GENERAL ABSTRACT: A comprehensive set of standards for delivery of newborn services in Florida are outlined with the purpose of meeting these goals: 123• To provide a Statewide Perinatal Intensive Care Center Program to women with high-risk pregnancies in order to save the lives and preserve the minds of their infants and to reduce maternal morbidity that may result from sub-optimal care during the peri- natal period. • To provide access to Perinatal Intensive Care Center Program services for all high-risk maternal patients requiring such care in Florida. • To provide assurance that the program method of service delivery represents the most efficient use of funds in providing optimal professional and comprehensive care and treatment for high-risk maternal patients and their babies. The sources for the developed standards were the Committee on Perinatal Health's Toward Improving the Outcome of Pregnancy; the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, Standards for Obstetric—Gynecologic Services; the Nurses Association of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, Obstetric Gynecologic and Neonatal Nursing Functions and standards; and Florida statute 383.15-21. It is recommended that the document be referred to in order to obtain the entire listing of recommended standards and criteria. ANNOTATIONS: These standards include the following sample: Facilities/Location • Institutions accepting grant-in-aid funds shall meet space standards as stated in the DHRS Rules for Hospital Licensure, within three years of designation of a hospital as a Regional Perinatal Intensive Care Center and shall meet the physical plant requirements of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists as defined in Standards for Obstetric-Gyneco- logic Services. • Each delivery room shall be a minimum of 324 square feet. • Delivery rooms shall be located in close proximity to labor rooms but away from the labor/delivery entrance. Personnel • The obstetrical service shall have 24-hour coverage by a consultant obstetrician for patient care and for communica- tion with other physicians in other hospitals. 124• An anesthesiologist, with special training or experience in maternal fetal anesthesia, should direct anesthesia services. • Subspecialists in pediatrics, internal medicine, surgery, and genetics shall be available to provide consultation. Florida, State of, Office of Comprehensive Planning 1978 Health Problem Analysis, A Phase in the Development of the Florida State Health Plan, Infant Mortality. Tallahassee, FL. GENERAL ABSTRACT: Florida is trying to reduce the rate of infant loss through a number of specific programs. A variety of interventions are considered along with thorough analysis of infant mortality trends and projections. ANNOTATIONS: The equation for the calculation of the infant mortality rate for year x is: # of deaths to those under one year old for year x X 1,000 # of live births occurring during year x The formula used to calculate the perinatal mortality rate is: # of late fetal deaths + # of neonatal deaths X 1,000 total number of births The remaining infant mortality measures used are cause-specific rates. These measures are used to provide probabilities of infants dying from specific diseases or conditions. The formula for these measures is: X of infant deaths due to cause Y in year x X 1,000 total number of live births in year x It should be noted that the vast majority of causes of infant death are not easily classifiable under the four major factors discussed above. Fifty- one percent of all infant deaths are due to the broad spectrum of diseases known as "diseases of early infancy". Similarly, the category "all other causes" account for 11.5 percent. Regional Neonatal Intensive Care Centers Infants/expecting mothers must be referred to the Regional Neonatal Intensive Care Centers by local physicians. Usually, these local physicians attempt to identify high-risk mothers before delivery in order to assure 125that the infant is born within the center. This technique is thought to improve the chances of the infant's survival. Since admission is based upon the criteria of physical need and avail- able space, local physicians are supplied with a statewide telephone line to an information center which provides data concerning the availability of space at all centers, arranges for transportation and provides immediate consultation. Currently, there is a statewide discharge developmental evaluation occurring. Included in this evaluation program are all infants discharged from a center whose birth weight was less than 1501 grams and a 20% random sample of all other discharged infants. The focus of this evaluation is to ascertain the impact that these centers have on the survivability of patients and the reduction of physical and/or mental impairments to these infants. Possible Health System Intervention Modes to Reduce the Level of Infant Mortality Community Health Promotion and Protection Services These programs would be primarily educational in scope. They would attempt to inform the public, particularly those who are in or are approaching the primary child-bearing period of life (18-35 years old), of the associated danger of behaviors which are known to be harmful to the unborn. The settings of such programs could vary from public schools to television/ radio/newspaper advertisements. Prevention and Detection Service Their purpose is early detection of causes of disease and/or diseases themselves. Included under this rubric would be genetic counseling, pre- conception examinations, prenatal examination, post-partum examinations and other services to try and identify potential high-risk parents. Diagnostic and Treatment Services The further development of such services designed to lower infant loss should be based on the outcome of new programs developed under the preven- tion and detection services. Health System Enabling Services These services would include provisions to enhance the condition under which other health services would be delivered. Programs developed within this area could include those which continually monitor the trend in infant mortality and make recommendations to the appropriate governmental bodies. On needed action, the awarding of grants that would enable the conducting of research which might have a positive effect on infants' life chances, and the development of ancillary services, such as transportation, which would increase the utilization of preconception, prenatal and post-partum services to those who require such. 126Florida, State of, Office of Comprehensive Planning 1978 Health Problem Analysis, A Phase in the Development of the Florida State Health Plan, Obstetric Services. Tallahassee, FL. GENERAL ABSTRACT; Both in Florida and elsewhere in the nation, experience with the neonatal centers has shown an approximate reduction from 50% to less than 10% in retardation, cerebral palsy, and other results of prematurity, when com- pared with impairment rates of low birth weight babies prior to the avail- ability of neonatal intensive care services. Efforts to improve pregnancy outcomes have resulted in the development of several programs. Three major programs are operational in Florida. They are the Maternal and Infant Care Program, the Regional Neonatal Intensive Care Centers and the Special Supplemental Food Program for Women, Infant and Children. The Improved Pregnancy Outcome project will begin operation soon. ANNOTATIONS: There are data which indicate that those infants who are born in a hospital with a neonatal intensive care center, have a better chance of survival than those infants who must be transferred. The following data from the 1975-76 Evaluation Report by Children's Medical Services, Department of ±i and Rehabilitative Services, give a comparison: PATIENTS DEATHS MORTALITY RATE BORN IN RNICU 2,288 210 9.2% TRANSPORTED IN 1,232 217 17.6% TOTAL 3,520 427 12.1% Also, there are other data which indicate those infants born in hospitals with a RNICU may also have lower impairment rates. According to the Florida information, the average cost per patient (NICU) center) in fiscal year 1975-76 for both hospital and neo-natologist fee was $2,270.33. However, the cost of an individual infant can vary significantly. For example, an infant with respiratory distress syndrome can cost about $17,000 while a very small sick infant can run a bill up to $50,000 or $60,000. Maternal and Infant Program (MIC) MIC is a program offering general obstetric and infant care services to indigent families. Services including nutrition, personal hygiene and general health counseling as well as medical and nursing care are provided in-house and referrals are made to other programs for medical treatment of high-risk patients. 127Regional Neonatal Intensive Care Centers (RNICC) Florida will soon have a statewide network of RNICC's. Since national standards recommend one RNICC for every 10,000 live births per year, these new centers should allow Florida to more adequately address the needs of its newborns requiring early intensive care. Within the RNICC's, services for maternal-fetal, and neonatal care must all be located in the same complex and within close proximity. The purpose of the program is to reduce morbidity and the chances for permanent impairment. Special Supplemental Food Program for Women, Infants and Children (WIC) The WIC provides high nutritional supplements to high nutritional risk population groups which include low income pregnant women, post-partum (up to six months) and nursing (up to one year) mothers, infants, and children under age five. In order to be eligible for program benefits, applicants must meet three criteria: nutritional risk, financial risk, and geographic location. Improved Pregnancy Outcome Project (IPO) In an attempt to reduce the incidence of fetal, neonatal, post-neonatal and maternal mortality, the IPO project will employ two general intervention strategies: • identify and treat the factors associated with high-risk pregnancy, and • develop a sophisticated and comprehensive medical program to provide care to mothers and newborns at high risk. General findings of the Florida Office of Comprehensive Health Planning include: • Government sponsored programs of prenatal care should develop casefinding and outreach capabilities to the extent that these programs achieve at least 50% client enrollment during trimester 1 of pregnancy. • The State should continue to fund the development of regional perinatal intensive care centers in order to facilitate the development of "levels of care" in obstetric care. • Fuller utilization should be made of Certified Nurse-Midwives in the delivery of obstetric care. Evidence indicates that these professionals provide high quality care and enjoy a high degree of consumer acceptability. • Changing prevailing assumptions employed in determining obstetric bed need can result in greater cost containment than efforts to consolidate services. For this reason efforts should be made: to encourage more OB physicians and physician groups to maintain 128privileges at more than one hospital and investigate the potential for decreasing the length of postpartum hospital stays. Grand Rapids Emergency Medical Services Symposium on Critical Care Patients 1975 Grand Rapids EMS Symposium on Critical Care Patients: Part III. Systems Approach to the Care of the High Risk Perinatal/Neonatal Patient. Grand Rapids, Michigan. Available from: Emergency Medical Services Clearinghouse, Box 911, Rockville, MD 20852. GENERAL ABSTRACT: This document provides an overview of ten topics from the EMS perspec- tive. Relevant material is annotated below. In addition to a selected bibliography, each chapter references several specialized documents. ANNOTATIONS: Systems Conceptualization and Design for Pre-Hospital, Hospital and Critical Care Phases This chapter covers topics of: state and regional organizational responsibilities for development of a perinatal system, regional relation- ships, three phases in the development of a system (from 0 to 5 years), historical development of perinatal care systems and brief descriptions of existing systems noting staffing and other characteristics. A section on special issues discusses: rationale for location and structure of the high risk unit, physical structure, communications, use of a central clearinghouse for patient census and referral information and new adapta- tions (resuscitation teams, increased nursing staffing at peak times, subsidies for regional high risk care, medical cross-staffing within a region, research and tracking of care for EMS patients going through the system). Identification of the High Risk Infant Approximately 50%-60% of all fetuses destined to become sick neonates can be identified. Early identification of high risk infants and delivery of proper care has decreased perinatal mortality and improved long-term morbidity. After Wisconsin initiated regional care centers in 1968-1969, there was an overall statewide improvement in morbidity which was much greater in areas served by NICUs compared to those without them. A partial list of high risk factors, organized by the time sequence in which they occur is abstracted here. 129• Prior to Pregnancy •• Anemia •• Diabetes •• Age under 15, and over 40 •• History of previous fetal or neonatal loss, low birth weight infants or genetic defects. • During Pregnancy •• Medical illnesses, e.g., hypertensive cardiovascular disease, hyperthyroidism, renal disease, venereal disease, hepatitis, herpes simplex, and other infectious diseases. •• Narcotic addiction •• Drugs •• Marked nutritional abnormality •• Abnormal fetal presentation •• Abruptio Placentae •• Eclampsia, pre-eclampsia •• Malignancy •• Premature Labor •• Prolonged pregnancy •• Multiple pregnancy • During Labor •• Fetal heart rate aberrations •• Fever or other signs of infection •• Meconium in amniotic fluid in other than breech presentations. • At Birth •• Birthweight less than 1500 grams •• Severe blood loss •• Low Apgar score especially at five minutes. •• Congenital malformations e.g., choanal atresia, cleft lip and/or palate, diaphragmatic hernia, cardiac and pulmonary malformations, tracheo- esophageal fistula, omphalocele, myelomeningocele and renal anomalies. •• Meconium staining •• Severe hemolytic disease • In the Nursery •• Respiratory distress, e.g., respiratory distress syndrome, pneumothorax. •• Thermal instability, fever or maternal fever. •• Convulsions. •• Shock, asphyxia, or metabolic acidosis persisting beyond two hours of age. 130•• Cyanosis •• Sepsis and/or meningitis •• Apnea •• Hypoglycemia Areawide Planning for an Emergency Neonatal Transport System, Facilities and Manpower Resources Facilities and manpower planning are discussed under the assumption that a viable transport service is a necessary component of a three level system. A method for determining NICU bed need is proposed: • Calculate population in need on the basis of number of live births in an area and its population density, socio-economic factors, and percent of pre-term infants. • Determine average length of stay. • Calculate number of patient days. Patient days = Number of Newborns in Need of Secondary or Tertiary Care Average Length of Stay Determine bed need , , , Number of Patient Days Beds Needed = ----------—------------ 365 Sample staffing standards are also presented: • 5 staff nurses are required for 1 nurse for each of 21 shifts per week when vacation, education and sick time are considered. • Ratios of 1 nurse to 3 infants for special care and 1:1 for intensive care are suggested. Treatment Protocols for Pre-Hospital and Critical Care Phases There are at least four approaches used to develop treatment protocols. • Early referral (at 20-28 weeks gestation) of the high risk mother to the center obstetrical staff for defini- tive management protocols for specific conditions with the mother being delivered at the hospital or at the center according to her response to management. • Early arrival at referring hospital and stabilization of patient by center personnel rapid transport to the Center. In some instances a team from the center may arrive prior to delivery for resuscitation of the newborn at delivery or to transport the mother to the center. 131• The center team begins definitive treatment of the newborn or mother and then transports the stabilized patient to the Center in a deliberate manner. • Stabilization and treatment primarily provided by the referring hospital staff in phone consultation with the center staff prior to transport of the patient by the referring hospital or center personnel. Protocols for functions performed at Levels I, II and III are briefly discussed as are education, transport and communications. The need for system-wide protocol standards is discussed. Technological Advances and Adoptation Now Applicable This chapter briefly examines antepartum evaluation of fetal well-being (amniocentesis, ultrasonography, oxytocin challenge test); intrapartum monitoring of fetal status (continuous fetal monitoring) and neonatal monitoring (neonatal respiratory assistance, apnea monitors, measurement of ambient oxygen concentration, blood gas assessment, ultrasonography, photo therapy, infusion pump, environmental control and biochemical moni- toring . Training Programs for Spectrum of Para-Professionals and Professionals The staff components of an EMS system are discussed as they relate to high risk newborn care. Evaluation of Mortality and Morbidity Indices and Compliance in the Care of the High Risk Newborn Infant Evaluation is performed at 4 levels: the hospital of birth, inter- hospital care (transport), the Level II or III referral unit and at the State agency (Health Department). Data collection at the hospital of birth should include, for all infants: • number of live births • number of fetal deaths (early, intermediate, late) • number of neonatal deaths • birthweight (in grams) • gestational age (accurate to within two weeks) • age at death • number of infants transferred to another facility for special care Care practices should be reviewed in light of the standards of care of newborn infants as outlined in Hospital Care of the Newborn Infant. Parti- cular attention should be paid to resuscitative and supportive care practices, surveillance for the infant at risk, management of special conditions (pre- maturity, respiratory distress, the small for gestational age and large for 132gestational age infant), and criteria for transfer. Autopsies should be obtained wherever possible and reviewed on a regular basis to identify pre- ventable causes. Inter-hospital care data is usually collected by the referral center. Such information relates to: • number of infants transferred • hospital of origin • hospital of destination (Level II or III) Inter-hospital transfer activity is a measure of the degree to which an institution or region complies with the concept of regionalization. Level I and II units should transfer patients according to their high-risk newborn rate. Transfers will also vary with the number of high-risk pregnancies transferred to an appropriate facility prior to delivery (which will reduce the number of high-risk infants) and the level of care able to be provided locally (which may modify the criteria for transfer). Such figures can give an estimate of the number of newborns in a region which might require transfer for special care and this can be compared with the actual volume. The disparity between the figures (calculated versus actual) could provide an index of compliance. Poor compliance may be assessed at the patient (parent), physician, hospital administration or community levels. Referral center data should include (in addition to that recorded for any inborn infants under hospital of birth): • Birth weight (in grams) • Gestational age (accurate to within two weeks) • Neonatal deaths • Age at death Transfer rates (per 100 live births) should be compared with mortality rates (predicted and actual) for both hospitals and regions (counties, states, etc.). Studies have shown that the transport of high-risk newborns can significantly alter mortality rates. Low transfer rates and high mortality suggest a hospital which may have problems in identification of high-risk infants, early supportive care or poor compliance with the concept of regionalization for whatever reason. High transfer rates (e.g., in excess of 5%) may suggest inability to provide minimum supportive care appropriate to a Level I unit or indicate a high-risk population. The referral center is charged with the greatest responsibility for evaluating the qualitative aspects of high-risk newborn care. While mor- bidity in infants between 1500 grams and 2500 grams birth weight has decreased dramatically, attempts to produce survivors from infants less than 1500 grams (particularly less than 1000 grams) may still be associated with significant morbidity in the form of CNS handicap, retrolental fibroplasia and chronic lung disease. Centers should carry out frequent audit of the short and long-term outcome of intensive care practices. The state's Health Department should play the major role in the collation and evaluation of mortality indices. Information should be compiled on: • fetal death rate (broken down by gestation: early, intermediate and late; the latter being further sub-divided antepartum, intrapartum), 133• neonatal death rate (broken down by age at death: under 24 hours; under 72 hours; under 7 days; under 28 days), • perinatal death rate All deaths should be charged to the hospital of birth. Deaths occurring outside hospital should be recorded by scrutiny of death certificates. Neonatal death rates can be grossly misleading for comparative purposes if birth weight and gestational age characteristics of the population are not taken into account. Neonatal mortality is markedly affected by the number of low birth weight and premature infants in a newborn population. These effects can be normalized by using "predicted mortality" for a given population based on a reference standard. This can then be compared to the actual mortality of that population. When comparisons are made between populations, the predicted mortalities are used to determine their comparability with respect to birth weight and gestational age. Educational Programs in Perinatal Health to the Consumer and the Community Health Systems Agencies are encouraged to develop consumer education subcommittees which can facilitate regionalization efforts. Federal Program on Neonatal High Risk Infants The major support for services for high risk infants are appropriations ynder Title V of the Social Security Act. The title is described. The Impact of P.L. 93-641 on Perinatal Manpower A major concern from the perinatal perspective is how manpower can be developed to meet health service needs. Approaches to predicting national requirements are discussed. Health Planning Council, Inc. 1978 Perinatal Care Center Standards (Draft). Madison, WI. GENERAL ABSTRACT: This document discusses agency-developed standards and criteria for Perinatal Care Centers. ANNOTATIONS: Determination of need projections for perinatal care centers shall be calculated in the following manner: 134• In a service area, the five-year projected need for neonatal care beds shall be computed as follows: •• Neonatal Intensive Care Beds = 0.9 x 5 year projected average annual number of births 1,000 •• Neonatal Intermediate Care Beds = 1.13 x Intensive Care Bed Need. • The number of additional neonatal ICU beds needed in a service area shall be determined by subtracting existing beds from the five-year projected bed need. •• The neonatal ICU bed need shall be adjusted to reflect the volume of patients who may appropriately be served in neonatal intensive care facilities located out of state or in adjacent service areas and the volume of patients from adjacent areas who may appropriately be served in the NICU facility. Emergency Transport for High-Risk Infants These standards agree with those explained by authors such as Swyer. Generally, a twenty-four hour emergency transport capability for high-risk infants, either through agreements with ambulance services outside of the perinatal care center or through a transport capability operated by the perinatal care center should be available. Health Systems Agency of Kane, Lake and McHenry Counties 1977 Perinatal Services Support Document. Lake Zurich, IL. GENERAL ABSTRACT: The specific services that are included within this Perinatal report include: (1) family planning services; (2) pregnancy testing and counseling; (3) patient education on high-risk factors; (4) prenatal medical evaluation and monitoring; and (5) inpatient obstetric and newborn care. Several significant problems are identified. These include: • The neonatal mortality rate for Kane County and the perinatal mortality rates for non-whites in the Kane, Lake and McHenry population are significantly higher than the overall figures indicating health status problems particularly to those segments of the population. 135• There is strong emphasis placed on providing more counseling and family planning services. • Other improvements in the perinatal system call for alternative medically coordinated settings for delivering both prenatal and obstetric services as a means to provide more acceptable care and to restrain costs. The increased use of allied health manpower—nurse practitioners in particular—was emphasized to increase the productivity of existing physician manpower. ANNOTATIONS: Systems Goals • There should be a multi-level system of delivery for all inpatient facilities servicing the maternal and infant obstetric needs of the HSA residents. • Increase the availability of subsidized prenatal medical evaluation and monitoring for low and moderate income women in the HSA. • The cost of delivering inpatient obstetrical and newborn services in the HSA should be restrained, consistent with the delivery of quality medical care. • Inpatient obstetrical units, capable of providing at Level I care, should be accessible to all pregnant women within the HSA. • The incidence of perinatal loss per individual hospital should be reduced. • Continuity of perinatal care should be improved by the avail- ability in all inpatient obstetric facilities of partial or complete rooming-in programs and family-oriented services. • To improve the availability of perinatal care by allowing for increased utilization of alternative medically coordinated delivery settings and services. • There should be a sufficient number of neonatal, Level III, intensive care beds accessible to the HSA population. 136Health Systems Agency of San Diego and Imperial Counties 1978 Newborn Intensive Care Study Group, Report to the Planners Committee. San Diego, CA. GENERAL ABSTRACT: The HSA of San Diego and Imperial Counties recognizes that neonatal intensive care is the provision of comprehensive and intensive care for all contingencies of the newborn infant. Infant transport is an integral part of a regional NICU system. Three integrated levels of newborn care must be provided. ANNOTATIONS; In a letter from the San Diego/Imperial HSA to the Federal Office of Planning, Evaluation and Legislation, some comments were made on Proposed Guidelines for Neonatal Intensive Care Units. Some of these are useful for investigating in the process of systems development. First, the letter suggests that the age limitation on patients served is too restrictive. Although newborns are defined for statistical purposes as babies less than 29 days old, newborn intensive care units serve somewhat older babies as well. The HSA recommends that the age limitation be eliminated from the guidelines. Also, it is stressed that Guidelines should distinguish between tertiary and intermediate level neonatal intensive care facilities. In particular, standards that require all neonatal intensive care units to serve populations of a million or more and that do not allow exceptions for travel time are not appropriate for the intermediate level neonatal intensive care units. It is recommended that the National Guidelines (and regulations adopted by planning agencies) be revised to allow consideration of travel time in determining how intermediate level units should be distributed. Finally, it is recommended that any reference to a study of efficiency of NICUs should be specific as to the bed composition and the occupancy rates maintained in the units studied. Some Recommended Guidelines • Existing intensive care newborn nursery services shall have an annual occupancy rate of 85 percent or more. • In consideration of economic feasibility and high quality of care, any hospital with an intermediate intensive care unit should have at least 1,000 to 2,000 births per year. (Toward Improving the Outcome of Pregnancy, Committee on Perinatal Health.) • Physicians referring sick newborns for intensive care should be kept informed of and involved in the care of the newborn at all stages in the care process. (Toward Improving the Outcome of Pregnancy.) 137• There should be an established plan in the newborn NICU whereby infants no longer requiring acute or sub-acute intensive care are transferred back to the referring hospi- tals. (as stated by George Ryan, M.D.) • Intermediate newborn intensive care facilities should not provide care for newborns who require assisted ventilation for more than 12 hours. Illinois Central Health Systems Agency 1977 Health Systems Plan (Perinatal Services Component). East Peoria, IL. GENERAL ABSTRACT: These standards and recommendations are based on the 1974 State of Illinois Plan for Perinatal Health in Illinois, developed by the Compre- hensive State Planning Agency and Illinois Committee on Perinatal Health. ANNOTATIONS: Definition of High-Risk Pregnancy: • Occurring to women older than 40 years; • Occurring to women 19 or younger; • Occurring to women who have had 5 or more previous pregnancies; • The birth of an infant of less than 5 pounds, 8 ounces; • The birth of an infant weighing more than 9 pounds, 15 ounces; • Multiple births; • Those occurring to women with a previous fetal or infant death; • Those occurring to single women; • Those occurring to women with previous abnormalities; • Those occurring to women with a medical history of hypertension, diabetes, or other medical or surgical conditions, and those that are born during a delivery that had complication. The above criteria/conditions should be served at a Level II or III facility. Some General Standards: • Illinois suggests that there be 1 perinatal intensive care center per 15-20,000 births and the following guidelines for Perinatal Medicine Intensive Care Center: •• A geographic location reasonable related to the region to be served by the center; 138•• A record of perinatal care demonstrating high quality, progress, and experience in high-risk perinatal medicine; •• A well-qualified medical staff, continuously available and capable of providing care and consultation in a maximally efficient manner; •• On-going educational program at many levels of experience, not only as a measure of a hospital's ability and prepared- ness to mount new educational programs, but also to pro- vide continuous care of high-risk perinatal medicine; •• Qualified full-time personnel in key positions to evaluate and help upgrade programs in regional hospitals. Acceptability: Perinatal care centers and follow-up services should seek feedback regarding satisfaction with services from both consumers and providers. Continuity: The different levels of perinatal care services should be closely linked with each other and with follow-up programs for continuing care. Maine, State of, Comprehensive Planning Agency 1973 Intensive Care of High Risk Newborns in Maine. Augusta, ME. GENERAL ABSTRACT: The concerns expressed by Maine's pediatricians and medical practitioners on the issue of developing a neonatal intensive care capacity prompted the State Comprehensive Health Planning Agency to bring together interested physicians and concerned groups. The meetings resulted in the Planning Agency's contracting with a consultant neonatologist, Dr. Joseph Kennedy, Jr. of St. Margarette's Hospital and Tufts University. Dr. Kennedy agreed to review background material supplied by the Planning Agency, visit selected Maine hospitals and pediatricians and write a report summarizing his findings on neonatal care in Maine. It is suggested that its statistical findings and recommendations for program development are comparable and applicable to situations in other states. ANNOTATIONS: In Maine for the years 1969-1971 there were 771 neonatal deaths reported. The following categories (I.C.D.A. codes) describe the primary cause of death of nearly 775 neonatal deaths in these three years. This report contends 139that 225 were probably preventable if an intensive care facility were established and if a transportation referral system were operative. Neonatal deaths for Maine by selected causes 1969-1971 Cause (I.C.D.A. code) Explanation Number 776.1 Hyaline membrane 101 776.2 Respiratory distress 37 776.9 Asphyxia of newborn 183 777 Immaturity 93 Other 357 Total 771 Size of Neonatal I.C.U. for Maine An intensive care nursery must be prepared to handle a minimum of 1/3 of the infant deaths in a region. It is recommended that a fifteen to twenty bed nursery seems to be ideal size in terms of optimum care and management. With current mortality experience, a fifteen bed I.C.U. nursery can serve 20-25,000 annual deliveries. Maine would supply approximately two hundred and fifty infants yearly if the region served is the entire State- This would require a ten to twenty bed I.C.U. nursery and would also depend upon the amount of care given in the referring hospital and whether or not convalescing infants were transferred back to the hospital of birth. Transportation As described in the statistical section of the report, an important component of any proposed regional care system is the safe and rapid transfer of the infant from outlying facilities to the intensive care nursery. An effective transfer system must include one or more infant transfer incubators with a battery capable of coping with low temperatures over prolonged periods of time. It must be able to derive power from either helicopter or ambulance. A heated ambulance will be necessary in any event for the small infant. Methods for the provision of oxygen, suction and incubation must be available when needed. A physician or nurse experienced in neonatal techniques must accompany the sick infant. Copies of all pertinent records, together with a sample of the mother's blood must be provided. Dr. Kennedy recommends that two hours in transit by land is a maximum for the sick newborn. Air transport should be considered for longer trips. Financial Considerations The consultants' investigation determined that care in a N.T.C.U. costs $150 to $200 per day. Average stay in an I.C.U. is 6 days. Cost per individual is $900 to $1200. Care in a convalescent nursery at the center or referring hospital is $100 per day. Cost per individual $2,000 plus $1,000 = $3,000. Transportation costs may add $100 to $200 = $3,200 total costs. 140With 20,000 deliveries per year, Maine will generate two hundred and fifty referrals per year, generating fifteen hundred patient days at $100 per day or an additional $350,000. This is a total bill of $525,000 per year, plus transportation charges ($35,000 annually). Insurance Coverage of Neonatal Care A survey of Maine newborn insurance in late 1972 reveals the following • Blue Cross and Blue Shield In the event the mother is eligible for maternity care benefits, the newborn child is provided with routine nursery care benefits in accordance with the existing contract and is also provided with the identical level of benefits available to the member parents under the parents contract. • Union Mutual Covers a flat rate for maternity. Whatever is left from the mother's hospitalization will be carried over to routine nursery care. Should the baby have a defect, the claim has to be submitted and the insurance company will decide whether they will pay. • Aetna and Travelers These insurance companies will write policies that either pay for the child's care from day one or from day fourteen. Evaluation After a regional neonatal intensive care delivery system had been set in operation, the following methods for measuring the level of fulfillment of objectives may be applied: • Demonstration of ability to correct clinical abnormalities (e.g. hypoglycemia, hypocalcemia, anemia, hemolytic diseases, bleeding asphyxial respiratory failure). • Demonstration of ability to identify and manage high-risk pregnancies by interceding with the appropriate amount of medical care. • Demonstration of improvement of overall mortality rate, compari- son of these statistics with other area indices and notification of institutions with significantly different rates than comparable institutions. • Long term assessment of the growth, development, and morbidity of services including evaluation through school age.Maryland, State of, Comprehensive Health Planning Agency 1978 Perinatal Services. Baltimore, Maryland. GENERAL ABSTRACT: This paper outlines a regional approach to planning for the provision of perinatal services, which implies a coordinated and cooperative sub- system of health care for pregnant mothers and neonates within the Metro- politan Baltimore area. The complexity of services, new developments in the sub-specialties about outcomes and results require a coordinated, planned approach to perinatal care appropriate to the needs of the mother, fetus and neonate. For a regional perinatal system to function, attention must be given to coordination and communication among all the components of the system, so that appropriate levels of care are sought to improve the outcomes of all pregnancies. ANNOTATIONS: Cost According to estimates prepared by the National Committee on Perinatal Health, the operating budget for a perinatal intensive care center with the capacity to provide intensive care to 1,000 mothers and newborns annually is 2.6 million dollars per year. However, since the numbers of very high risk patients are not large, most complications of pregnancy and abnormalities of newborn infants can be properly managed in perinatal high- risk centers, equipped and staffed to provide moderately complex care. These perinatal high-risk centers still cost an estimated $1.2 million per year to operate. Perinatal Intensive Care Center • Centers shall have three types of nurseries: the newborn normal; an intermediate care area which can be used for acutely ill and convalescent infants; and a neonatal I.C.U. • In order to maintain competence, the Perinatal Intensive Care Center should be able to identify a service area that had 8,000-12,000 deliveries annually based on present birth rates and has 1,000 or more deliveries in that institution. Capabilities • performance of a Caesarean section within 30 minutes. • a blood bank service on a 24-hour basis with blood and fresh frozen plasma available at all times. • in-house obstetrical anesthesia service on a 24-hour basis. 142• radiology service on a 24-hour basis, providing diagnostic and evaluation techniques for the prenatal period. Ultra- sonography should be available at the High-Risk Center or at a nearby Perinatal Center (ICU). X-ray technicians shall be available on a 24-hour basis. • continuous electronic external-internal maternal-fetal monitoring with appropriate interpretation on a 24-hour basis. • availability of a skilled dietician for nutritional manage- ment of high-risk pregnant patients and moderately ill newborn infants. • the NICU Center should provide education and orientation to other public and private agencies and personnel who provide services to the family and infants. Massachusetts, Commonwealth of, Department of Public Health, State and Regional Task Force on Neonatal Intensive Care and Technical Advisory Group of the Perinatal Welfare Committee. 1977 Neonatal Intensive Care Standards and Criteria (Draft) Boston, MA GENERAL ABSTRACT: This group developed neonatal intensive care standards and criteria for use in Certificate of Need and the development of plans to establish regional multi-institutional arrangements. The Committee on Perinatal Health Model is used as the basis for a regionalized perinatal system. The document discusses: effectiveness of neonatal intensive care in pre- venting neonatal mortality and morbidity, prenatal screening of high-risk mothers, levels of care, status of neonatal intensive care in Massachusetts, the Committee on Perinatal Health's hypothetical budget model of a Level III Regional Perinatal center and planning issues and methodology. The annota- tions of standards and criteria presented here were developed from this latter section. Appendices on a queuing approach to bed need estimation, special care nursery standards, psychosocial aspects of neonatal intensive care and selected references are included. ANNOTATIONS: Standard Neonatal intensive care programs consist of Intensive, Intermediate and Growing/Recovery beds which are housed within a single institution or within separate but affiliated institutions within a 2.5 mile radius of each other. A hospital providing 3 levels of neonatal intensive care must pro- 143vide appropriate support services, maintain formal affiliation agreements and comply with the other criteria to be part of a Neonatal Intensive Care Program. A hospital providing three levels of care without meeting these requirements is designated as a NICU. • Criteria •• A Neonatal Intensive Care Program or NICU must: (1) have a 24-hour respiratory therapy service (including neonatal ventilatory equipment); (2) have laboratory, diagnostic and evaluative procedures for maternal, fetal and neonatal care as stated in the current standards of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists and the American Academy of Pediatrics; (3) maintain adequate space, equipment and personnel for maternal and fetal intensive care in ante- partum, labor, delivery, recovery and postpartum periods; (4) be staffed and equipped to treat critically ill infants including those requiring prolonged assisted respiratory support, intravenous therapy, hyperalimentation, major surgery, blood pressure monitoring, heart rate and respira- tory monitoring as well as treatment of sepsis; and (5) have affiliations directed toward formal agreements that include transfer agreements, cooperative staffs sharing, rotation of students and a clear definition of how return transfers are to occur between the hospitals in a Neonatal Intensive Care Program and Level II community hospitals. Standard Neonatal Intensive Care Units must be part of a NICU Program that provides for efficient and effective affiliations with other ICUs and linkages with community hospitals. • Criteria •• A NICU should develop and/or maintain: (1) cooperative educational programs covering all aspects of neonatal and perinatal care (not just for returning infants); (2) 24-hour consultation services; (3) prenatal screening of high-risk mothers and newborns; (4) clear referral networks for the transfer of high-risk patients when indicated and return transfer to the community hospital; and (5) mechanisms monitoring mortality and morbidity within regional systems. Standard A NICU Program or Unit must care for at least 2% of its service area's total births in Intensive Care, 3% of its service area's total births in Intermediate Care, and 5% of its service area's total births on Growing/ Recovery care. 144• Criteria •• Level II hospitals with Special Care Nurseries should have a minimum of 2,000 births and meet standards for Special Care Nurseries set out by the Public Health Department (in an Appendix). Level II hospitals without Special Care Nurseries must be supported by at least 1,000 births. Exceptions are made on the basis of geographic isolation. Standard A NICU Program should have a total of at least 24 and no more than 30 combined intensive and intermediate care beds and 8 to 10 growing/recovery beds. (These growing/recovery beds may be regular nursery beds). • Criteria •• All these beds should maintain an annual occupancy rate of 85% in already existing beds, and a corresponding average length of stay of 15 days for all three levels combined. These levels are broken down in the following way: Level of Care Average Length of Stay Maximum/Intensive 5 Intermediate 5 Growing/Recovery 5 15 Standard Bed Need • Criteria Two formulas for determining bed need are used: •• Queuing formula Bed Need = (K X ADC) + (K2 X ADC) Where = .84 and = 2.1 This formula is based on a queuing theory which is developed on the principle that a bed will be available 95% of the time. These beds should project an annual occupancy rate of 85% and a corresponding average length of stay of 15 days for all three levels combined. 145•• Utilization rate formula: Standard Total Births in Service Area X _ , „ % Infants Needing Care X ALOS Bed Need = . ■ ■ \ 365 X Occupancy (85%) This formula allows for a regional bed need projection and a bed need projection for individual programs. A Neonatal Intensive Care Program or Unit should be located in or affiliated with a general hospital with a maternity unit. • Criteria •• Optimal placement of additional Neonatal Intensive Care Unit beds should be in perinatal centers. •• If the Neonatal Intensive Care Beds are located in a hospital without an obstetrical unit, it must have a Standard formal affiliation with a hospital providing this service. Service area: A Neonatal Intensive Care Program must be supported by a minimum of 8,000 births per year. (A 90 minute travel time is possible within Massachusetts' 3 designated service areas). • Criteria •• Adjustments to numbers of births will be made if it can be clearly demonstrated that there is a change in population projections within a given service area, not accounted for in general population pro- jections. •• Two or more Neonatal Intensive Care Programs with Standard common service areas should not exist if it can be demonstrated that consolidation of those programs can effectively produce fewer Neonatal Intensive Care programs that: increase the quality of care with no significant increase in cost or reduce cost with no decrease in quality of care. Hospitals must clearly document: (1) the number of intensive, inter- mediate and/or growing/recovery beds in their existing unit (if any) and in the proposed unit; (2) the manner in which the unit fits into or performs 146the functions of a Neonatal Intensive Care Program; (3) the possibility that existing or proposed beds may be used to fulfill nursery and/or medical services other than Neonatal Intensive Care; and (4) the average number of admissions originating strictly from within the Program or Unit's service area, in the two most recent years. Massachusetts Maternity and Newborn Regionalization Project 1976 The Final Report. Boston, MA. (Available from the Massachusetts Department of Public Health). GENERAL ABSTRACT: Regionalization of perinatal care has received increasing support and acceptance over the past decade. Regional perinatal programs are an effort to organize efficient and effective systems for the delivery of perinatal services within a defined geographic area so that all mothers and newborns have adequate access to a full range of high-quality services appropriate to their needs. The present emphasis on regionalization has evolved from a variety of concerns and developments in maternal and newborn care and has been shaped by important trends in our health care system. The Massachusetts project is the broadest examination of the various health, social and economic factors affecting the outcomes of birth and the practices of newborn and maternity care. ANNOTATIONS: Standards and regulations for maternity and newborn services are recommended: • Recommended immediate revisions of hospital licensure regulations for perinatal services; • Recommended classification of high-risk maternity and newborn patients; • Recommended criteria for designation of: Perinatal Centers; • Recommended uniform perinatal terminology; and • Revision of Department of Public Health Statistical Forms and Live Birth Certificate. Travel Time It is necessary that all mothers and newborn infants have access to high- risk intensive care. The "travel time" should be equitable for all high- risk mothers throughout the State who are prebooked for their delivery in 147a perinatal center and for those newborns needing to be transferred to a neonatal intensive care unit. A number of studies have made recommendations of 1-2 hours regarding the maximum amount of time allowable for the ambulance transfer of a high risk baby (Maine State Comprehensive Health Planning Agency, 1973, Ross Conference, 1974). Average Length of Stay • The calculation of average length of stay should be sensitive to patient mixture and level of care provided. These calcula- tions should include the four basic ICDA categories: delivery without complications, deliveries with complications, complica- tions of pregnancy and induced abortions. • The Project recommends the following average length of stay levels be used in projecting future utilization rates: •• Deliveries without complications - 3.22 •• Deliveries with complications - 4.34 •• Complications of pregnancy - 2.26 •• Abortions - 1.68 • These average lengths of stay should be updated on a yearly basis Birth Projections • It is recommended that the birth projections developed by the Project be used as a basis for the development of birth projections for hospital maternity service areas. A range of projected births should be calculated and adjusted over time in accordance with actual fertility experience. • Future maternity service construction and renovation should take into consideration anticipated long-range fluctuations in births. Bed Need • Multi-institutional systems should be’ developed for maternity services throughout Massachusetts. Two or more maternity services, when operating together in a given multi-institu- tional system, can realize significant cost savings when coordinated with the queuing maternity bed need approach recommended by the Project. • The Project recommends use of the queuing bed need formula approach. 148Transfer Systems • High-risk mothers should be identified as early as possible in their pregnancy. Appropriate consultation should be obtained and delivery arranged in a high-risk center when indicated. This is particularly important for mothers with potentially high-risk newborns. • Community hospitals should identify high-risk newborns as early as possible. Appropriate consultation should be obtained and transfer arranged to neonatal intensive care units when indicated. Early identification and transfer is important in order to obtain maximum benefit. Michigan, State of, Department of Public Health, Bureau of Health Facilities 1977 Hospital Nurseries and Newborn in Care Services, Minimal Criteria and Guidelines. Lansing, MI. GENERAL ABSTRACT: The Michigan Department of Public Health has developed a document which outlines planning policies , and criteria formulas for NICU bed need require- ments based upon methods suggested by Dr. Paul Swyer are presented. ANNOTATIONS: Some general considerations for planning: • NICU centers should serve a minimum of 6,000 infant deliveries per year. • NICU should be separate from the newborn nursery since it will usually be admitting patients born elsewhere than in the hospital's own delivery suite. Follow-up Evaluation Inherent in meeting the objectives for regional intensive care centers is the need for long-term follow-up of the patients who have been cared for in a unit. Careful prospective follow-up shall be done for critical evaluation of the modes of therapy as well as to assure that necessary continuing care is being received. This long-term evaluation shall be a function of the regional intensive care unit's staff. 149Potential Patients In planning for the development of a regional center a projection of the potential number of infants to be cared for on a yearly basis shall be made. Roughly, ten percent of all deliveries can be classified as high- risk; with two to four percent of all deliveries needing intensive care. Nursing Manpower Neonatal intensive care consists primarily of intensive nursing. In the highest level of intensive care it may be necessary to provide nurse staffing on a 1:1 or 1:2 nurse patient ratio. Medical Supervision A qualified physician, responsible for the unit, shall be available in the hospital 24 hours a day to assure the delivery of intensive care. This means a large staff of trained nurses and physicians is essential for 24-hour coverage. Physical Standards • To accommodate the daily or hourly changes in care require- ments, units should be contained in one large, open space providing a minimum of 80 square feet of usable floor space per infant. • A service module situated at least 30 inches above the floor shall be available for each infant bassinet station. This should contain: •• Six 110-volt single phase duplex receptacles with proper grounding. •• Oxygen and compressed air outlets. •• Compressed air and oxygen storage and distribution systems shall be installed in accordance with proper safety codes. Intermediate Care An intermediate care area should be adjacent to the NICU and provide space for 40 square feet per patient with a minimum of three feet of clearance between bassinets. Convalescent Area The convalescent area is for prematurely born or low weight infants who require frequent feeding and more nursing hours per day than normal infants at term and those who no longer need to be in the intermediate care area but require more nursing hours than normal infants because of 150slow feeding or other conditions. This area should be adjacent to the intensive and intermediate care areas. Thirty square feet per infant shall be provided. There shall be four electrical, one oxygen and one suction outlet available at each infant station in the convalescent area. Transportation • The pattern of transport shall follow the natural and logical lines of referral, as established by a regional plan of intensive care nurseries. • An adequate and trained staff shall execute the transfer in a well-equipped vehicle — either ambulance or aircraft. The vehicle shall be equipped for total life support of the infant. • The infant should not be moved until optimal stabilization of his condition is established by the response team. During transfer he should receive intensive therapy and monitoring as indicated by any change in his clinical status. • The establishment of a central state agency is desirable to coordinate transport efforts and to develop avenues for the funding of such a system. Such an agency could also monitor the patient loads in the various nurseries, suggesting proper primary transport to a less busy nursery, particularly in high density population areas. • The referring hospital shall in all instances provide all necessary and pertinent information concerning the infant, parents, referring physician, medical history of the mother, the pregnancy, labor and birth informa- tion, diagnosis and medical detail causing the referral, as well as blood, fluids or other therapy given. This detail will be best provided on a specially designed referral and transfer sheet properly executed and accompanying the infant at the time of transfer. Minnesota State Health Planning and Development Agency 1977 Perinatal Services. St. Paul, MN. GENERAL ABSTRACT: The State Planning Agency of Minnesota has developed a document which outlines in guideline/criteria form plans for further developing and improving the state's system of perinatal health services. 151ANNOTATIONS: Cost The report notes that the operating budget for a perinatal intensive care center with the capacity to provide intensive care to 1,000 mothers and newborns annually is $2.6 million per year. However, the very high- risk patients can be serviced in a regional perinatal high-risk center at an estimated $1.2 million per year. Infant Mortality Goal Minnesota's infant mortality rate was 13.7 in 1975, below the national average of 16.1; Minnesota proposes to lower it to fewer than 12 per 1.000 live births. Financial Feasibility The financial viability of an inpatient perinatal service should be demonstrated by illustrating that the unit can be operated without financial support from other institutional services or units. As a general rule, the revenue generated by the unit should be able to support its own direct operating cost, the depreciation costs, and its share of allocated overhead costs. The following should be considered when applying this criteria: • The proposed schedule of prices to be used compared to prevailing prices and costs; • The anticipated sources of payment; • A projection of anticipated utilization; and • Income and expense statements for each year of operation until breakeven. The breakeven point (when revenue exceeds all of the direct operating costs) should be passed within three years of operation and proposed prices should reflect actual costs. Accessibility to High-Risk Center The high-risk center should serve an area providing not fewer than 5.000 to 8,000 live births per year. An area of at least 2,000-8,000 live births per year may be justified on the basis of geographic isolation. Such centers should have a minimum of 500 deliveries per year. There should be a minimum of 1,000 in-hospital deliveries per year in the Metropolitan Urban Statistical Area. Outcome of Service Use for High-Risk Centers The intensive care center, in cooperation with other perinatal services, should assume responsibility for developing reporting mechanisms to evaluate 152the results of the regionalized perinatal system. Such evaluations should be done annually and results made available to all components of the system. Input Resources For all perinatal health facilities which are community based: • The service should possess the capability to perform a cesarian section within 30 to 60 minutes. • The service should have blood available, including fresh frozen plasma. • Anesthesia service should be available on call. • The service should have radiology service on call, with the ability to perform portable basic radiologic studies in the nursery. • Clinical laboratory service should be available on call, with the capability to perform studies on blood glucose, hematocrit and bilirubin. Capability to perform sem- micro studies on blood gases, electrolytes and calcium is advisable. Nassau-Suffolk Health Systems Agency, Inc. 1977 A Plan for Regionalization of Obstetrical Services in Nassau-Suffolk. Melville, N.Y. GENERAL ABSTRACT: The Plan provides a comprehensive look at what needs to be accomplished in regionalization of newborn services in Nassau-Suffolk areas of New York. ANNOTATIONS: Standards for three levels of newborn care are outlined. Here some standards for the most intensive level of care are presented. Consultation The Level III unit must have the capability for providing consultation for prenatal, intrapartum and neonatal problems of patients at Level I units and at Level II units in the region. This must be an around-the-clock capability, and the consultant must be highly qualified and have recognized competence. Clearly defined responsibility and procedures for obtaining consultation must be understood by all. 153Transport Equipment and a trained team of personnel for the transport of maternal-fetal and newborn patients must be available at all times at the Level III unit. Optimal management and treatment before and during transport will be possible if the transport team goes to the referring hospital with all necessary supplies and equipment. This also provides opportunity for direct education of personnel at the referring hospital. Perinatal Data Collection/Evaluation The Level III unit must take an active role in developing mechanisms for reporting results and analyzing these to assess accomplishments or deficiencies of function in the regional system. All components of the region must participate in planning these mechanisms and in sharing and analyzing the data. There will be periodic evaluation of Level III care. Teaching Most Level III units will be actively involved in the teaching and training of medical students, interns, residents, and fellows, as well as of nurses and other health professionals. The Level III units must also be responsible for developing and implementing programs of continuing or refresher education throughout the regional system. Research Most Level III units will be actively engaged in research to develop new knowledge in reproductive biology and in related aspects of behavioral science. This must be considered in relation to the extent of responsi- bility for patient care assigned to staff members. Personnel Requirements • Physicians •• Administration Administration of a Level III unit should be the responsibility of a physician with extensive training and experience in perinatal medicine and in administration of health services. Responsibilities will include financial and budgetary matters, planning and development of regional programs, coordination of program elements, and evaluation of effectiveness. The Administrative Director may also function as the Associate Director for Obstetrics or Neonatology. •• Associate Directors for Obstetrics and Neonatology The Associate Director for Obstetrics and the Associate Director for Neonatology must have extensive training and experience in 154high-risk care and in interspecialty function in providing this care. •• Anesthesia Perinatal anesthesia services must be directed by an anesthesiologist with special training in maternal-fetal and neonatal anesthesia and be on call 24 hours a day. •• Physician Function The physician should examine the mother shortly after admission and at appropriate intervals during labor to assess her condition and the status of the fetus. He should be appropriately available during the later stages of labor or when there is evidence of fetal distress or maternal complications. In cases of emergency cesarean section or unexpected fetal distress, a second physician should be available to assist the primary physician with the care of the mother and subsequent resuscitation and care of the newborn. In situations where this is not possible, the physician should be assisted by a surgical technician and the professional nurse serving the delivery room must be competent in resuscitation of the newborn. •• High-Risk Delivery All deliveries of high-risk mothers should have an obstetrician and pediatrician in attendance. • Other Personnel •• Nursing The Level III unit must have a highly trained Supervisor of Nursing Services for inpatient nursing services. She should have advanced training in obstetrics and newborn nursing. •• Social Worker One or more medical social workers will be required in Level III units. •• Nutritionists Nutritionists with special knowledge of prenatal dietary management must be available. 155New Jersey, State of, Department of Health 1978 Standards and General Criteria for the Planning, Certification of Need and Designation of Perinatal Services. Trenton, N.J. GENERAL ABSTRACT: The New Jersey Department of Health adopted standards and criteria based upon the earlier work of the Maternal and Infant Care Services Committee of the State Health Planning Council with supplemental standards developed by the Health Plan Development Services Division. This work employs the Committee on Perinatal Health model. ANNOTATIONS: Level I • Functions A Level I Perinatal Unit provides services primarily for un- complicated maternity and newborn patients and supportive care for infants returning from Level II or Level III units. There shall be capabilities and equipment for: immediate resuscitation, cesarean sections on short notice (24 hours), on-call anesthesia service (24 hours), oxygen administration, intravenous therapy and electronic fetal monitoring. • Utilization At least 1,000 annual deliveries. Waivers granted in cases of severe geographic isolation or when there is demonstrated medical necessity created by accessibility barriers for certain population groups. A hospital may not have fewer than 500 deliveries per year. • Size No neonatal unit size is stated. The minimum size of a Level I obstetric unit is 20 beds, waived in the above-mentioned cases or where cost-effectiveness considerations indicate otherwise. In no case should the unit be less than 10 beds. • Physical Facilities Neonatal units shall contain a normal newborn nursery, an observa- tion area and a resuscitation area where an infant can be immediately treated. • Staff The neonatal area shall have: 156•• A Board-eligible or Certified pediatrician on active staff and in charge of the service. •• A Board-eligible or Certified pediatrician on call on a 24- hour basis. •• A Clinical Nurse Coordinator, Supervisor or Head Nurse who has completed an approved continuing education course in neonatal nursing and eligible for ANA Board Certification in neonatal nursing. •• A nursing service staffing ratio of one R.N. per shift with one additional member of the nursing staff for each six- eight infants. •• Trained personnel for infant resuscitation, on a 24-hour basis. Level II • Functions In addition to Level I functions, a Level II Perinatal Unit provides intermediate care services for the majority of women and newborns with complications. A unit must be able to provide care for newborn respiratory problems up to the point when pro- longed ventilatory assistance is required of newborns with other complications, up to the point at which transfer to a Level III facility is necessary. There shall be capabilities for short-term assisted respiratory therapy to enable stabilization and preparation for transfer, where indicated, including: continuous monitoring of inspired oxygen, continuous monitoring of body core temperature and altera- tion of environmental temperature, control of intravenous therapy with infusion pumps, provide assisted ventilation on a short-term basis with bag and mask and continuously monitor cardio-respiratory function. There shall also be resuscitation equipment (including laryngoscopes, endotracheal tubes, a resuscitation table with temperature control and infusion equipment), provision of 24-hour clinical laboratory services (including, but not limited to, microbilirubin, blood sugars, electrolytes, blood gases and calcium) and 24-hour radiology and blood banking services for the newborn. • Utilization A minimum of 1,500 annual deliveries. Waivers granted in cases noted under Level I. A hospital may not have fewer than 500 deliveries per year. 157• Size No neonatal unit size is stated. The minimum size of a Level II obstetric unit is 20 beds, waived in cases discussed under Level I. • Physical Facilities Neonatal units shall contain a normal newborn nursery, an observation area, an intermediate care nursery and an area for the immediate resuscitation of the newborn. • Staff The neonatal area shall have: •• A Board-eligible or Certified pediatrician on active staff and in charge of the service. , M A Board-eligible or Certified pediatrician on call on a 24-hour basis. •• A Clinical Nurse Coordinator, Supervisor or Head Nurse who has completed an approved continuing education course in neonatal nursing and eligible for ANA Board Certification in neonatal nursing. •• A physician or R.N. in-house 24 hours who is qualified to perform ongoing assessment and emergency treatment including, but not restricted to, endotracheal intubation, umbilical catheterization, and biochemical resuscitation of a distressed neonate. •• Physician anesthesiologist coverage on call 24-hours. •• •• All registered nurses shall have completed an approved continuing education course in neonatal nursing within one year of designation as a Level II unit. A nurse staffing pattern for the Normal Nursery of one R.N. per shift with one additional member of the nursing staff for each six-eight infants. • • A nurse staffing pattern for the Intermediate Care Nursery of at least one R.N. per shift with a ratio of one nurse for each three infants. Level III • Function In addition to care capabilities for Level I and II patients, the 158Regional Perinatal Center must have: a designated NICU 24-hour fetal scalp and neonatal arterial blood gas analysis; ultrasonic (A and B scan) and radio isotope capabilities; continuous neonatal blood pressure, heart rate and respiration monitoring; the capability to maintain respiration on a long-term basis; the capability to regulate temperature and monitor oxygen flow, a permanent monitor in the delivery/cesarean section room for monitoring capability until delivery and genetic counseling services. The Level III center's regional responsibilities include establish- ing a regional laboratory for estriol determinations and amniotic fluid analysis with 24-hour or same day service, data collection and analysis, continuing education, and developing a well-defined regional system of communication, consultation and transport between all three levels of care. Children's hospitals, or NICUs in hospitals with no or small obstetric services, are desirable as referral centers only when they have the capability to provide certain highly subspecialized care, otherwise unavailable. • Minimum Population Base The service area shall have a minimum of 10,000 deliveries per year including those of the applicant. No waivers are possible. • Utilization At least 2,000 deliveries annually. No waivers are possible. • Size No neonatal unit size is stated. The minimum size of a Level III obstetric unit is 20 beds, waived in cases discussed under Level I. No waiver conditions are stated. • Physical Facilities In addition to the Level II unit requirements, a designated NICU. • Staff The NICU shall have the same requirements as stated under Level II. 159New Mexico Health Systems Agency. 1976 Toward Improving the Outcome of Pregnancy—Perinatal Care in New Mexico. Sante Fe, N.M. GENERAL ABSTRACT: The New Mexico HSA accepts the philosophy set forth by the National Committee on Perinatal Health. ANNOTATIONS: The following are New Mexico's guidelines for referral from a Level I Unit to a Level II or Level III newborn intensive care unit: Previous History Consultation is recommended for the following, determined by history: • Two or more previous premature labors or history of low birth- weight infants (less than 2,500 grams). • Excessively large previous infants (greater than 4,000 grams). • Previous Cesarean section. • Previous significant dystocia. • Two or more previous abortions. • Previous stillbirth or neonatal loss. • Suspected previous incompetent cervix. • Medical indication for termination in previous pregnancy. • Previously diagnosed abnormalities of genital tract. • Previous history of need for special neonatal care. • Previous infant with a known or suspected genetic or familiar disorder. • Previous severe emotional problems associated with previous pregnancy or delivery. Early Pregnancy Consultation is recommended in early pregnancy for: • Maternal diabetes mellitus. 160• Patient of less than 15 or more than 40 years. • Psychiatric disorder. • Marked nutritional abnormality (obesity, abnormal stature, low weight for height, etc.). • Malignancy. • Unresponding urinary tract infection. • Suspected ectopic pregnancy. • Suspected missed abortion. • Severe hyperemesis. • Exposure to teratogens (radiation, infection, chemicals). • Positive serologic test for syphilis. • Pregnancies complicated by medical disease (endocrine, renal, cardiac, hypertensive, etc.). • Anemia not responsive to iron therapy. • Rh isoimmunization. Late Pregnancy Consultation is recommended in late pregnancy for: • Vaginal bleeding. • Toxemia. • Hydramnios or oligo-hydramnios. • Antepartum fetal death. • Thromboembolic disease. Newborn The following conditions are recommended as the basis for seeking consultation and, when necessary, arranging transport of a newborn from a Level I Unit to a Level III Unit. A coordinated program for continued participation of the referring physician in the care of the patient is essential. • Gestation of 35 weeks or less; birthweight less than 2,000 grams. 161• Respiratory distress and metabolic acidosis persisting after 2 hours of age or requiring ambient oxygen in excess of 40% after 2 hours of age. • Infant of a diabetic mother. • Neonatal seizures. • Suspected neonatal sepsis and/or meningitis. • Congenital anomalies requiring observation for neonatal surgery. • Meconium aspiration. New York, State of, Department of Health 1978 Memorandum—Neonatal Centers for "High Risk" Babies. Albany, N.Y. GENERAL ABSTRACT: This is a summary of a research investigation into the basic question of whether or not the high risk pregnancy is being identified at the community hospital level (Level I) and pre-booked for delivery at the larger hospitals. The data show that most high risk infants are being delivered at community hospitals and are not pre-booked. ANNOTATIONS: The following recommendations are derived from this study: • Since postpartum neonate transfers carry added risks for the infant compared to pre-booking, we should as a minimum establish prenatal consultative, monitoring, and pre-booking standards for all hospitals of all sizes to eliminate duplica- tion of high cost services in the larger hospitals and stimulate the smaller more numerous maternity services to detect and pre-book. • All high risk pregnancies should be identified during the pre- natal period or the intrapartum period by those larger hospitals in a single city and transported to the single hospital with the intensive neonatal care resource. • A general principle should be that it is much better to pre-book the high risk mothers at the NICU regional center than it is to transfer their high risk babies after birth to the neonatology 162centers. This principle is set forth in the national committee report "Improving the Outcome of Pregnancy." • No woman should be delivering a baby weighing less than 2,500 grams in a Level I hospital in the central city if such systems are installed and transfers during the prenatal and the intra- partum period are planned for in advance. New York, State of, Department of Health 1977 Memorandum — Measuring Value Received for High-Priced Care of Premature Infants. Albany, N.Y. GENERAL ABSTRACT: This report raises some serious health systems management questions as to why three times as much is paid for the care of a "premature" infant (birthweight under 2,500 grams) as for other infants. Moreover, an analysis of the survivorship of 29,781 white "premature" infants for the years 1973-76 in upstate New York shows that the infants born at "approved" premature care centers did not show any evidence of benefit that was commensurate with the three-fold price paid. ANNOTATIONS: This study is aimed at two conclusions: (1) The health systems manage- ment process for designation of approved centers and pricing practices for care of premature infants are uncoordinated.; and (2) the inputs required for premature care center designation are probably irrelevant or at least unassociated with the output results sought — improved life expectancy for "premature infants." The study suggests that the results of this analysis create a need to conjecture as to what might be producing this paradox of highest risk infants doing better at unapproved centers and lowest risk at approved centers. It should be recommended that careful evaluations of our pricing practices for care of premature infants be conducted. North Central Health Systems Agency 1978 Specialized Services Review Criteria: Neonatal Special Care Centers (Draft). Atlanta, GA. GENERAL ABSTRACT: The North Central Georgia HSA had defined financial standards and criteria which should be helpful for monitoring the financial conditions of 163NICUs as well as contribute to efforts of rational and feasible construction and development of systems. ANNOTATIONS: Statements regarding financial feasibility: • There would be a two year set of pro forma financial statements (including revenue and expense) and their statements would indicate financial feasibility. • Rates for the service would be comparable within the region for similar services and would relate to cost and operating expenses. • The service would be cost effective when compared to existing or other alternatives. Financial Information to be Included: • Estimated Annual Service Expenditure • Estimated Annual Capital Expenditure • Estimated Annual Cost to the Community • Equipment Cost per Unit of Service • Construction Cost per Unit of Service • Other Costs per Unit of Service • Total Costs per Unit of Service • Percent Occupancy • Return on Investment • Return on Revenue Ohio Department of Health, Division of Maternal and Child Health, Bureau of Maternal and Child Health. 1977 State Perinatal Guidelines. GENERAL ABSTRACT: The Ohio Perinatal Consultant's Group has accepted, in principle, the national recommendations for the Regional Development of Maternal and Perinatal Health Services (Toward Improving the Outcome of Pregnancy), developed by the Committee on Perinatal Health. ANNOTATIONS: Communication in the Regionalized System Communication and coordination can be strengthened through the pro- vision of regular and frequent opportunities for education within the region. 164Workshops, seminars and regional conferences are excellent ways to establish, improve, and secure lines of communication. Emergency Transportation An effective emergency transportation service for high-risk maternal and newborn patients should: • Make available emergency transportation to all sick mothers and newborns from home to hospital or from one center to another within the system. • Make that transportation as efficient, rapid, and safe for the patient as possible. • Provide care to a patient during that transportation by a specially trained team of personnel skilled in maternal and newborn emergency medical care. • Provide proper preparation for any patient who needs transportation. Education, Regional Level Objectives With each region, regional perinatal education coordinators will: • Identify the scope of the provider target group by number and specific type of personnel, e.g., pediatrician, obste- trician, etc. • Determine the needs/desires of each identified group. This determination can be made through a survey of a representative sample of each group and/or through consultation with profes- sional organizations and through the Neonatal Log. • Develop educational program and curricula tailored to suit the educational requirements of each group. • Provide assistance to professional groups in the development, organization, and presentation of perinatal education activities. • Assist hospitals and ambulatory care facilities in organizing developing, and implementing in-service education programs. • Identify existent perinatal education resources. • Develop and assist in developing printed materials and other educational aids. • Work toward the establishment of a regional learning resource center to function as a source for perinatal education materials. 165• Assist in promoting the use of the Neonatal Log as a mechanism for hospitals to identify areas suitable for educational programs. • Develop an education component designed to foster the team concept of patient care, i.e., understanding and coordination of the capabilities of each member of the perinatal care team by all team members. Ross Laboratories 1977 Planning and Design for Perinatal and Pediatric Facilities. Columbus, Ohio: Ross Laboratories GENERAL ABSTRACT: This report, developed for physicians, administrators and architects, is an excellent discussion of the planning considerations and design requirements of perinatal, obstetric and pediatric units. Chapters are devoted to: perinatal care planning and regionalization, obstetrical facilities, Neonatal Special Care Units (annotated below), normal newborn nurseries, pediatric units (including pediatric ICUs), psychological aspects of care for pediatric patients and pediatric ambula- tory care planning. Sample floor plans, functional programs and equipment specifications are included. ANNOTATIONS: Levels of Care in Neonatal Special Care Units Maximal care is for neonates requiring nearly constant observation, highly specialized support services and frequent medical interventions. Intermediate care infants do not need intensive management but do require frequent observation and/or special interventions. Minimal care is convalescent care. Population in Need The American Academy of Pediatrics estimate is referenced: 10% of all live births require intermediate or maximal care. Two to four percent of all newborns will require maximal care although socio-economic differences can raise this figure as high as eight percent. Six to eight percent of all newborns will require intermediate care. Length of Stay For planning purposes, a base of 20 day ALOS for maximal care infants and 12 days for intermediate care are suggested. The authors note that 166actual lengths of stay in most Special Care Nurseries are lower. Bed Ratios Depending upon the adequacy of local Level II perinatal care centers, the ratio of intermediate and minimal to maximal care beds could range from 4:1 to 1:1 within a Level III facility. Cost In 1974 the annual cost of operating a 32 bed regional Special Care Nursery was estimated at $1.5 million (including equipment, personnel, supplies overhead, transport and education). Using a 10% annual inflation rate yields a $2 million figure for 1977 average daily room charges are over $250. The initial cost of one maximal care bed is over $15,000. Maintenance and replacement of equipment costs between $2,000 and $3,000 annually. Minimum Volume A minimum of 2,000 annual births (or combined in-house births and transport referrals) is necessary to justify at least two physicians trained in high-risk neonatal care. Personnel Requirements A minimum of two neonatologists is suggested. Ideal nurse/patient ratios are 1:1 or 1:2 for maximal care infants, 1:2 to 1:4 for intermediate care and 1:4 to 1:6 in minimal care. Paramedical personnel required for support include inhalation therapists, laboratory technicians, biomedical engineers, social service representatives and nursing subspecialists. Functional Planning and Programming The objective of a functional program is to provide the architect with information which enables him to prepare high quality, detailed plans. A functional program identifies each space required for the medical program and to specify size and dimensions of these spaces. An example of a detailed functional program developed for a 50 bed (10 maximal, 20 intermediate, 20 minimal) unit in a regional referral center is included (10,000 births in region). The authors stress that each proj- ect is unique and space planning must be individualized. Equipment There are four major categories of equipment. Environment control includes incubators, open care platforms and radiant heaters. Life support's respiratory equipment, positive or negative pressure respirators, ventila- tion bags and oxygen mist hoods, along with oxygen and compressed air sources. The diagnostic category equipment includes patient monitors, portable X-ray machines, electrocardiograph and electroencephalograph 167machines. Treatment equipment includes infusion pumps, dupcounting devices, bilirubin lights, phototherapy lights, heaters, heat lamos and suction apparatus. Texas, State of, Department of Health 1976 Guidelines for the Texas Regional Perinatal Care System. Austin, TX. GENERAL ABSTRACT: The Task Force decided that workable guidelines could be developed for regional perinatal care in Texas by taking the recommendations of the National Committee on Perinatal Health for the development of a regionalized system for perinatal care and modifying them as necessary for use in Texas. ANNOTATIONS: Nursing Personnel, Level III The overall responsibility for the perinatal nursing activities should be vested in a director of perinatal nursing services or in two directors, one of obstetric nursing services and one of neonatal nursing services, who coordinate their activities. These directors should have experience and training in the nursing care of patients at high-risk including, where possible, an advanced degree in obstetric-newborn nursing. Other Personnel • Nutritionists with social knowledge of perinatal dietary- management must be available. • One or more medical social workers will be required. • An administrative coordinator should be provided. Clerks are essential for efficient operation of the unit. Intensive Care Nursery Personnel • There should be a Head Nurse with experience and special training, and where possible an advanced degree, in the care of critically ill newborns and in relating to and communicating with parents., • All nurses working in the Intensive Care Nursery should be highly skilled in the observation and nursing treatment of critically ill infants. The nurses must be highly skilled in cardiorespiratory monitoring, techniques and equipment for assisting ventilation and for administering intravenous fluids, preoperative and post- 168operative care of newborns, and emergency treatment of conditions such as apnea and seizures. • These nurses should be skilled in infant transport and may be part of the transport team bringing infants to the Level III Unit. These nurses usually will have additional advanced didactic and practice training. • A recommended minimum for nursing staffing pattern on all shift assignments in an intensive care nursery is one professional registered nurse for every 1 or 2 critically ill infants. In addition, two qualified nurses are recommended for every 5 moderately ill infants who are early in the recovery phase of their illnesses. Communication, Education, Evaluation • The Level III Units must be responsible for ensuring that programs of continuing in-service education are developed and implemented throughout the Regional Perinatal System. The Level III Units should have an active, formalized, ongoing relationship with the Level I and Level II Units of the region for the support of in- service education. • The Level III Unit must assume the responsibility for ensuring that systems of communication and transport are devised and implemented but the other Units must be fully participatory in formulating and agreeing with the Regional Perinatal Plan. • The Level III Units must provide the leadership in planning the mechanisms for reporting results and in collecting, sharing and analyzing the data to assess accomplishments and possible deficiencies of function in the Regional System. The other Units in the area must participate in planning these mechanisms and in collecting, reporting, sharing and analyzing the data. West Virginia Planning Committee for Perinatal Health 1976 A Plan to Improve Perinatal Health Care in West Virginia. Charleston, W. VA. GENERAL ABSTRACT: In order to develop a system of care which will enable every mother and newborn to receive optimal care in West Virginia, the committee recommended adherence, whenever possible, to standards established by the professional specialty societies which are regularly updated, published and circulated among hospitals and physicians. According to the committee, the standards for hospitals policies, services, personnel, equipment, facilities and 169record keeping which are outlined in this document should be emphasized in all hospitals providing maternity and newborn care. ANNOTATIONS: General Policies • An active program for identification and appropriate consultation for the high risk maternity patient at the earliest possible date in the pregnancy. • Provisions for a copy of the prenatal record to be avail- able in the labor and delivery unit 4 weeks prior to the established expected date of delivery. • A protocol of observations and procedures to be carried out during the postpartum period. Level I It should be the intent of planners and administrators to encourage both improvements in perinatal care in these hospitals and early consulta- tion for mothers and prompt referral of newborns whenever appropriate. Level II The following services should make up the Level II newborn hospital. • Prenatal, intrapartum and postpartum care of uncomplicated patients consistent with standards of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists; including capability for fetal monitoring. • Specialized prenatal services for the mother and fetus identified as high risk, including laboratory facilities for the determina- tion of urinary estriols and amniotic fluid analysis. B-scan ultrasound capability is highly desirable. • An intensive care area. • Caesarian section capability within 15 minutes. • Tubal litigation for purposes of sterilization. • A specifically designated special care nursery for the care of the neonate with complications. This nursery must be prepared to accept long-term patients transferred from other hospitals because of prematurity, sepsis, etc. • Capability for continuous electronic monitoring of heart rate and respiratory rate of infants in the special care nursery. 170• Exchange transfusion and phototherapy capability. • Capability for controlled full range oxygen administration. • Capability for emergency ventilatory assistance until transfer to Level III can be effected. • Twenty-four hour inhalation therapy services on call. • Transport assisted by professional personnel on call. Level III The following services should be provided by the Level III tertiary care newborn center. • Be capable of providing advanced life support in critical care units specially designed for obstetrical and newborn patients respectively. • Provide 24-hour consultation service for the region. • Coordinate and provide regional educational programs for physicians and nurses. • Provide a regional transport system for critically ill patients within the region, and coordinate transport with Level II hospitals. • Data collection for evaluation and analysis. • Conduct high risk infant follow-up clinics. • Conduct research in perinatal medicine. Transportation Approximately 90% of the 129 patients brought to the West Virginia University Medical Center by the neonatal transport team in 1975 required some form of supportive care and/or medication during transport. It is highly significant that prior to the formation of this transport service one-half of all admissions to the neonatal ICU died, whereas mortality dropped to 27% after its inception. There is overwhelming data from other countries, the United States and West Virginia indicating the marked decrease in neonatal mortality and morbidity in areas where such services are available. Communications Telephone copiers are commercially available to transmit copy through the wire. Such an instrument with terminals stationed at optimal points throughout the region, could be used to transmit chart and test results 171almost immediately to referral centers for consultation. The following recommendations pertain to necessary activities prior to the selection of any major technological undertaking in the area of communication concerning patient status. • A minimum data set of patient information needs to be agreed upon. • All data collection should pertain to private and service patients alike. • All data should be computerizable and a system of confidentiality should be built in as to the use of these data. • The transmittal of information must be interactive, or two-way. • A technical review of available systems should be undertaken with the intent of selecting a uniform transmittal system for the entire state. • Any system must be acceptable to the Emergency Medical Service System. Western Center for Health Planning 1976 Certificate of Need Planning and Review Criteria, Intensive Care Newborn Nursery. San Francisco, CA. GENERAL ABSTRACT: Each area health planning agency is encouraged to develop a plan for optimal neonatal care of high risk infants which is integrated with a comprehensive plan for the delivery of maternal and child health care. The following annotations are some criteria which are to be used for evaluation and review. ANNOTATIONS: Standard For any project to be located within a standard metropolitan statistical area of 500,000 or greater: • Travel time for surface infant transport should not exceed one hour. 172• For planning purposes a base of 8000 deliveries per year is required to support a tertiary care newborn intensive care nursery. • For planning purposes, a base of 2000 deliveries per year in the area is required to support a secondary (intermediate care) newborn ICU. Standard For any project to be located within an SMSA of less than 500,000 or in an area not included in an SMSA: • Travel time for surface infant transport should not exceed 2 hours. Helicopter and/or fixed wing trans- port should be arranged for service areas beyond 2 hour driving time. • For planning purposes, a base of 1500 deliveries per year in the area is required to support a NICU. Average Length of Stay: The average length of stay is 28-42 days. Estimation of Demand for NICU: Demand for NICU services may be estimated by projecting past utiliza- tion against the future population requiring services. Estimated No. of _ expected no. of births, 1978 X NICU patient days NICU beds needed live births, 1975 ______1975 _______ in 1978 365 X .85 The previous formula contains these assumptions: • The incidence of conditions requiring intensive care will remain constant. • The average length of stay of each neonate will remain constant. • 85% occupancy is the desired efficiency level. Capacity of NICU Facilities • Standard For any project to be located in a SMSA of 500,000 or greater: •• Eight beds for infants requiring 1:1 to 1:2 nurse to patient ratio. 173• Standard For any project to be located in a SMSA of less than 500,000 or in an area not included in an SMSA: •• Two beds for infants requiring 1:1 to 1:2 nurse to patient ratio and 6-8 additional beds with 1:3 to 1:4 nurse to patient ratio. Wisconsin, State of, Division of Health Policy and Planning 1976 Planning Standards for Perinatal Care Centers. Madison, WI. GENERAL ABSTRACT: These Standards are provided in order to establish an objective basis for review of proposed plans to construct or expand newborn services using the regional concept of delivery. ANNOTATIONS: Standards Accessibility-Time/Distance The location of a perinatal care center shall allow reasonable access to the perinatal services by patients in the region served. Reasonable access shall be interpreted as a maximum of two hours of driving time one way. Needs Estimation The five-year projected need for neonatal intensive care unit beds in a service area shall be computed as follows: • Intensive care beds: .9 x the 5 year projected average _____annual # of births __________ 1,000 • Intermediate care 1.13 x the intensive care bed needs beds: The number of additional neonatal ICU beds needed in a service area shall be determined by subtracting existing beds from the five year pro- jected bed need using the above method. In- and out-migrations of patients should be a factor taken into account when determining appropriate bed levels. 174Obstetric Facilities at Perinatal Care Centers In a service area with a single perinatal care center, the high-risk obstetrics service at the perinatal care center shall have facilities for high-risk deliveries sufficient to accommodate 5% of the deliveries in the service area of the center. In addition to high-risk deliveries, the obstetrics unit at a perinatal care center shall provide services for normal deliveries which amount to at least another 5% of the deliveries in the service area of the center. In a service area where there is more than one perinatal care center, each shall have obstetrics facilities for high-risk and normal patients sufficient to accommodate at least 5% of the deliveries in the service area of the center. Minimum Delivery Base In a service area where the five year projected annual number of births is under 20,000, this projection shall constitute the minimum delivery base of the perinatal care center in that service area. In a service area where the five year projected average annual number of births is 20,000 or more, the minimum delivery base of each perinatal care center shall be at least 10,000. Affiliation Agreements Hospitals proposing to establish a new or to expand an existing perinatal care center, where the neonatal ICU and high-risk obstetrics components of the perinatal care center are located in separate institu- tions, shall (plan for) affiliation agreements between the institutions which are proposing to establish the center. The Affiliation Agreement shall include: • Provisions for a perinatal care center coordinating board involving medical and administrative staff from partici- pating institutions. • A description of the perinatal care center system which clearly distinguishes the respective roles, functions, and responsibilities of the institutions in this system. • Provisions for the effective coordination between the institutions of the perinatal care center designed to assure continuity of care to perinatal care center patients and to prevent the unnecessary duplication of staff in the perinatal care center. • Provision for the effective coordination of perinatal facilities and equipment between the institutions designed to minimize the duplication of these facilities and equipment in the perinatal care center. 175Staffing Standards Applicants proposing to develop a new or to expand an existing perinatal care center shall document that they meet or have plans to meet the following minimum staffing requirements: • Direction Nursing and medical care aspects of the perinatal care center shall be under the combined direction of a professional team including an obstetrician experienced in high-risk care, a neonatologist/pediatrician, and a registered nurse with special training and experience in high-risk perinatal care. • High-Risk Obstetrics Specialist The high-risk maternal/fetal and intrapartum intensive care segment of a perinatal care center shall be under the direction of a high-risk obstetrics specialist. This obstetrician shall have at least one year of experience in high-risk maternal intensive care in an organized high- risk program beyond the standard residency in obstetrics. Consultation from a high-risk obstetrics specialist shall be available for all high-risk patients. • Neonatologist/Pediatrician The high-risk fetal/neonatal intensive care segment of the perinatal care center shall be under the direction of a neonatologist who is board eligible or board certified in neonatology, or a pediatrician with at least one year of experience in an organized high-risk neonatal intensive care program. Consultation from a high-risk neonatal specialist shall be available for all high-risk patients. • Nursing Care Coordinator - Perinatal Nursing care aspects of both the obstetric and neonatal components of the perinatal care center shall be coordinated by a registered nurse. This nurse shall have obtained specialized nursing knowledge and skills by successfully completing an organized educational program in maternal or neonatal intensive care, and shall have at least one year of experience in an obstetrics unit associated with a neonatal intensive care unit, or in a recognized perinatal care center. • Registered Nurses - Staff - Obstetric A registered nurse shall be available to assist with the antepartum, intrapartum, and postpartum care of each 176high-risk mother. These RNs shall have obtained specialized nursing knowledge and skills by successfully completing an organized educational program in maternal intensive care. • Registered Nurses - Staff - Neonatal Registered nurses shall be on the nursing staff of the neonatal intensive care units on each shift. At least one RN on each shift shall have obtained specialized nursing knowledge and skills by successfully completing an organized educational program in neonatal intensive care. • Nurse/Patient Ratio - Neonatal ICU The neonatal intensive care units shall maintain a minimum ratio of one RN for every two intensive care infants. The intermediate care unit shall be staffed with one RN for every four patients or one RN and additional nursing personnel at a minimum ratio of one RN or LPN for every four patients. • Anesthesiologist An anesthesiologist shall be on call 24-hours per day. Staffing Guidelines • Anesthesiologist Anesthesia services should be directed by an anesthesiologists with special training in maternal-fetal and neonatal anesthesia. • Opthamologist An optamologist should be available on a routine basis to the neonatal intensive care unit. • Respiratory Therapist A respiratory therapist should be continuously available to the neonatal intensive care unit. • Social Workers The application of skills and methods of medical social work to the specific needs of the high-risk perinatal patients in the region should be under the direction of a social worker with a master of social work degree, who should supervise the social work staff. • Support Staff The following support staff should be available to the perinatal care center for consultations within a 24-hour period: Cardiologist 177(pediatric and adult), Pediatric Surgeon, Radiologist, General Surgeon, Neurosurgeon, Hematologist, Cardiothoracic Surgeon, Endocrinologist, Internist, Pathologist, Urologist, Orthopedist, and a Nephrologist (pediatric and adult). In addition, the following support staff should be available to the perinatal care center for periodic consultation: Medical Geneticist, Bio-Medical Engineer, Pediatric Neurologist, Psychiatrist, and Psychologist. Staffing Privileges Arrangements Perinatal care centers should establish or have plans to establish a policy of granting appropriate staff privileges to qualified physicians to deliver high-risk services at the perinatal care center under the supervision of the appropriate members of the medical staff of the insti- tution. Physician Consultation Arrangements There should be a 24-hour telephone consultation service from physician members and other high-risk unit staff to physicians and other professionals and hospitals in the service area of the perinatal care center to provide advice on approaches to patient care management and problems. Infant Transport • Transport team The treatment team for high-risk neonatal patients shall include a physician and a nurse who are active in newborn intensive care at the perinatal care center, and who have undergone a program of in-service training in the preparation and transport of high-risk infants. A transport team as above must be available 24 hours per day. • A physician need not accompany an infant who requires special care but is not in distress at the time of transfer, but at least one trained individual whose only responsibility shall be the care of the infant shall accompany the infant. • The transport team for high-risk maternal patients shall include a physician, eligible for certification in obstetrics and a nurse with basic knowledge of obstetric services. A transport team as above shall be available 24-hours per day. • Transport Vehicle Transport vehicles used for transport of high-risk infants should meet the provisions of General Services Administration EMS Standards "Federal Specifications - Ambulance and Emergency Medical Care Vehicles" (KKK-A-1822). 178• The transport vehicle shall be designed for standing room and shall carry appropriate self-contained equipment for intensive treatment and life support of newborn infants and maternal patients while in transit. • Equipment of high-risk infant transport should include, but is not limited to: infant transport incubator; infant resuscitation; and monitoring equipment for temperature if infant, heart rate, and environment oxygen. Facilities Applicants proposing to develop a new or to expand an existing peri natal care center shall document that they provide, or have plans to pro vide the following minimum facilities and services: • A perinatal care center shall be based in a single, or for this purpose, affiliated acute care facilities, with obstetrics and pediatrics units. • The neonatal ICU and high-risk obstetrics components of a perinatal care center shall be located in close physical proximity to each other in a single, or for this purpose, affiliated acute care facilities in the same or in contiguous communities, to encourage continuity and efficiency of care to the mother and her newborn, effective intrapartum care of the fetus, and to foster early infant/mother togetherness. • A perinatal care center shall provide family planning services as part of the perinatal services. • Medical services do not need to include abortions, but peri- natal center staff shall be knowledgeable of, and shall provide information regarding the availability of abortion services and problem pregnancy counseling. Facilities for High-Risk Neonatal Services Shall Provide For: • Neonatal intensive care area equipped for continuous intensive monitoring and life support therapy. • Intermediate care area or areas for infants po longer re- quiring continuous monitoring, but still needing frequent and special observation and treatment. This area may also admit infants directly from delivery requiring intermediate level care initially. • Capabilities continuously available in-house for: micro lab methods; blood gas and PH studies; hematology; in-unit radiology; blood bank, with blood and fibrinogen, platelets, and fresh blood; and, other capabilities as appropriate. 179• Follow-up clinic for the continued evaluation and care of the infant following discharge, including education for the parents in the proper care and management of the infant. 180BIBLIOGRAPHY OF CLINICAL LITERATURE Alden, Errol R. , M.D., Ted Mandelkorn, M.D., David E. Woodrum, M.D., Richard P. Wennberg, M.D., Colby R. Parks, M.D. and W. Alan Hodson, M.D. 1976 "Morbidity and Mortality of Infants Weighing less than 1,000 grains in an Intensive Care Nursery". From the Division of Neonatal Biology, Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists 1978 Health Care for Mothers and Infants in Rural and Isolated Areas. Chicago, IL: American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists 1973 Memorandum to the Committee on Health Care Delivery from Ervin E. Nichols, M.D. FACOG, Associate Director; Maternity and Neonatal Services and Facilities Guidelines for Levels of Complexities of Care. Chicago, IL: American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists 1971 National Needs in Obstetrics and Gynecology. Chicago, IL: American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Berger, Gary S., M.D., Dennis B. Gillings, Ph.D., and Earl Siegel, M.D. 1976 "The Evaluation of Regionalized Perinatal Health Care Programs". American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 125: 924-932. Berger, Gary S., M.D., J. Richard Udry, Ph.D., and Charles H. Hendricks, M.D. 1975 "Regionalized Perinatal Care: An Estimate of Its Potential Effect on Racial Differences in Perinatal Mortality in North Carolina". North Carolina Medical Journal 36: 476-479. Blake, Anthea, Ann Stewart and Diane Turcan 1977 "Perinatal Intensive Care". Journal of Psychosomatic Research 21: 261-272. Boehm, John J. 1976 "Identification of the High Risk Infant". Northwestern University Medical School — Division of Pediatrics Prentice Woman's Hospital and Maternity Center. Chicago, Illinois. Bryant, Sandra, R.N. 1976 "Nursing Aspects and Organization for Perinatal Care". Clinics in Perinatology Organization for Perinatal Care 3: 493-496. Guest Editor: Louis Gluck, M.D., Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders Company. Butterfield, Joseph L., M.D. 1976 "Newborn Country USA". Clinics in Perinatology: Organization for Perinatal Care 3: 281-295. Guest Editor: Louis Gluck, M.D., Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders Company. Butterfield, Joseph L., M.D. 1977 "Organization of Regional Perinatal Programs". Seminars in Perinatology: Regionalization of Perinatal Care 1: 217-233. Guest Editor: Leo Stern, M.D. New York: Grune and Stratton. 1811973 1975 1977 1978 1964 1976 1976 1977 1969 1975 1975 Bibliography of Clinical Literature - (Continued) Carrier, Charles, M.D., et al. Perinatal Intensive Care after Integration of Obstetrical Services in Quebec: A Policy Statement of the Quebec Perinatal Committee. Quebec, Canada. Available from: Quebec Perinatal Committee, Ministry of Social Affairs Province of Quebec, 1005 Chemin Ste-Foy, Quebec, Canada, G1S 4N4. Carrier, Charles, M.D. Report of the Quebec Perinatal Committee for Perinatal Mortality for the Year 1970 (First Part): Quebec Canada. Available from: Quebec Perinatal Committee, Ministry of Social Affairs Province of Quebec, 1005 Chemin Ste-Foy, Quebec, Canada, G1S 4N4. Chase, Helen "Infant Mortality and Its Concomitants, 1960-1972". Medical Care 15: 662-674. Chez, Ronald A., M.D., Harold E. Fox, M.D., John C. Hobbins, M.D., George J. Peckham, M.D., E. Derek Peske, M.D. and Mary Halderman "Monitor Every Patient in Labor?" Patient Care 12: 136-163. Clifford, Stewart, M.D. "Medical Progress, High-Risk Pregnancy. Prevention of Prematurity and the Sine Qua Non for Reduction of Mental Retardation and Other Neurologic Disorders". The New England Journal of Medicine 271: 243-249. Committee on Perinatal Health Toward Improving the Outcome of Pregnancy. White Plains, New York. The National Foundation March of Dimes. Donahue, Charles, Jr., M.A., Lou Freedman, Robert Danley, Ph.D., Ann Pettigrew, M.D., Nancy Shaughnessy, Sarah Fogerty, R.N. "The Use of Vital Events as a Data Source in the Planning of Maternity and Newborn Services". Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Public Health Association, October 21, 1976, Miami, Florida. Duxbury, Mitzi L., M.D. "Personnel and Staffing Needs for Perinatal Programs". Seminars in Perinatology Regionalization of Perinatal Care 1: 267-278. Guest Editor: Leo Stern, M.D. New York: Grune and Stratton. Effer, S.B., M.D. "Management of High-Risk Pregnancy: Report of a Combined Obstetrical and Neonatal Intensive Care Unit". Canadian Medical Association Journal 101: 55-63. Egan, Edmund A., Richard Boothby and E. Charlton Prather "Florida Regional Neonatal Intensive Care Program — Impact on Mental Retardation". Journal of the Florida Medical Association 62: 36-39. Ellis, William C., M.D. "How Maternal and Infant Care Has Been Improved in New Jersey". Contemporary OB/GYN 6: 73-77. 1821976 1977 1976 1977 1970 1978 1973 1975 1977 1975 1977 Bibliography of Clinical Literature - (Continued) Ferrara, Angelo, M.D., and Lucille Perrotta, M.D. "Infant Transport Services: An Overview". Pediatric Annals 5: 25-45. Ferrara, Angelo, M.D., Ph.D. "Evaluation of Efficacy of Regional Perinatal Programs". Seminars in Perinatology: Regionalization of Perinatal Care 1: 303-308. Guest Editor: Leo Stern, M.D., New York: Grune and Stratton. Fitzhardinge, Pamela M., M.D. "Follow-up Studies on the Low Birth Weight Infant". Clinics in Perinatology: Organization for Perinatal Care 3: 503-516. Guest Editor: Louis Gluck, M.D. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders Company. Giles, Harlan R., M.D., Jerry Isaman, M.A., William J. Moore, M.D. and C.D. Christian, M.D. "The Arizona High-Risk Maternal Transport System: An Initial View". American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 128: 400-407. Gluck, Louis, M.D. "Design of a Perinatal Center". Pediatrics Clinics of North America 17: 777-791. Goff, Robert, M.D. "The Bedside Microcomputer in the Intensive Care Nursery". Interface Age 3: 65-67. Goodwin, James and Paul R. Swyer, M.D. Regional Services in Reproductive Medicine. The Report of the Joint Committee of the Society of Obstetricians and Gynecologists of Canada and the Canadian Pediatric Society on the Regionalization of Reproductive Care in Canada. Sherbrooke, Quebec. Gorwitz, Kurt and Donald Smith, M.D. "Some Implications of Declining Birth Rates for Pediatrics". Pediatrics 56: 592-597. Haasis, Patricia, R.N. and Jay P. Goldsmith, M.D. "The First Year's Experience of a Neonatal Intensive Care Unit". The Journal of the Louisiana State Medical Society 129: 247-251. Hawes, Warren E., M.D., M.P.H. "A Survey of Newborn Intensive Care in California". The Western Journal of Medicine 23. Hein, Herman A., M.D. "Regionalization of Perinatal Care in Rural Areas Based on the Iowa Experience". Seminars in Perinatology: Regionalization of Perinatal Care 1: 241-254. Guest Editor: Leo Stern, M.D. New York: Grune and Stratton. 183Bibliography of Clinical Literature - (Continued) Hobel, Calvin J., M.D., Marcia A. Hyvarinen, M.D., Donald M. Okada, M.D. and William Oh, M.D. 1973 "Perinatal and Intrapartum High-Risk Screening: Prediction of the High- Risk Neonate". American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 117: 1-9. Honeyfield, Peter R. 1976 "Evaluation, Mortality and Morbidity Indices and Compliance in the Care of the High-Risk Newborn Infant". Denver, CO: Department of Pediatrics, University of Colorado. Johnson, Dorothy K., Dr.P.H. and Elizabeth A. Hefferin, Dr.P.H. 1977 "Perinatal Outcomes Among High-Risk Patients in Two Prenatal Care Programs". Inquiry 14: 293-302. Johnson, John D., Natalie C. Malachowski, Rose Grobstein, Doris Welsh, William J.R. Daily and Philip Sunshine 1974 "Prognosis of Children Surviving with the Aid of Mechanical Ventilation in the Newborn Period". Fetal and Neonatal Medicine 84: 272-276. Jonsen, A.R. , Ph.D, R.H. Phibbs, M.D., W.H. Tooley, M.D. and M.J. Garland, Ph.D. 1975 "Critical Issues in Newborn Intensive Care: A Conference Report and Policy Proposal". Pediatrics 55: 756-768. Jonsen, Albert R., Ph.D. and George Lister 1978 "Newborn Intensive Care: The Ethical Problems". Hastings Center Report. Kanto, William P., Jr., M.D. and Alex F. Robertson, III, M.D. 1977 "One Year's Experience of a Regional Neonatal Intensive Care Unit". Journal of the Medical Association of Georgia 66: 616-623. Knuppel, Robert A., M.D., Curtis L. Centrulo, M.D., Charles J. Ingardia, M.D., Kenneth A. Kappy, M.D., Joseph L. Kennedy, M.D., Marguerite J. Herschel, M.D., Gretchen Aumann, R.N., Marian Lake, R.N. and Anthony J. Sharra, Ph.D. 1979 "Experience of a Massachusetts Perinatal Center". New England Journal of Medicine 300: 560-562. Koops, Beverly L., M.D., John T. McCarthy, M.D. and L. Joseph Butterfield, M.D. 1978 "Who Pays the Bill for Neonatal Intensive Care?: Part III: Outcome" (mimeo). Reprints: L. Joseph Butterfield, M.D., The Children's Hospital, Department of Perinatology, 1056 East Nineteenth Ave., Denver, CO 80218. Leake, Rosemary, M.D., Alexandra Loew and William Oh, M.D. 1976 "Retransfer of Convalescent Intensive Care to Community Intermediate Care Nurseries". Clinical Pediatrics 15: 293-294. Mazzi, Eduardo, M.D., Ronald Gutberlet, M.D. and Jack A. Phillips 1977 "The Maryland State Intensive Care Neonatal Program, Transport System". Maryland State Medical Journal 26: 86-87. 1841978 1978 1974 1971 1974 1978 1967 1975 1974 1972 1977 Bibliography of Clinical Literature - (Continued) McCarthy, John T., M.D., Beverly L. Koops, M.D., Peter R. Honeyfield, M.D. and L. Joseph Butterfield, M.D. "Who Pays the Bill for Neonatal Intensive Care. Part I: Transport" (mimeo). Reprints: L. Joseph Butterfield, M.D., The Children's Hospital, Department of Perinatology, 1056 East Nineteenth Ave., Denver, CO 80218. McCarthy, John T., M.D., Beverly L. Koops, M.D. and L. Joseph Butterfield, M.D "Who Pays the Bill for Neonatal Intensive Care: Part II: Hospitalization" (mimeo). Reprints: L. Joseph Butterfield, M.D., The Children's Hospital, Department of Perinatology, 1056 East Nineteenth Ave., Denver, CO 80218. Meyer, Belton "Transport of High-Risk Infants in Arizona". Regionalization of Perinatal Care. Report of the Sixty-Sixth Ross Conference on Pediatric Care. Edited by Philip Sunshine, M.D., Columbus, Ohio: Ross Laboratories. Muirhead, Donald, M.D., Chairman Report on Perinatal and Infant Mortality in Massachusetts 1967 and 1968. Committee on Perinatal Welfare of the Massachusetts Medical Society. Boston, Massachusetts. Murphy, J. and W.A. Hodson "Neonatal Intensive Care". Postgraduate Medicine 56: 55-58. Pomerance Jeffrey, M.D., Christine T. Ukrainski, M.D., Tara Ukra, Diane H. Henderson, M.D., Andrea H. Nash, M.D. and Janet L. Meredith, R.N.,B.S "Cost of Living for Infants Weighing 1,000 Grams or Less at Birth". From the Department of Pediatrics, Ceders-Sinai Medical Center and University of California at Los Angeles. Pediatrics 61: 908-910. Quebec Perinatal Mortality Committee "Analysis of Perinatal Deaths by Cause, Part Two". Quebec, Canada. Available from: Quebec Perinatal Committee, Ministry of Social Affairs Province of Quebec, 1005 Chemin Ste-Foy, Quebec, Canada, G1S 4N4. Quebec Perinatal Mortality Committee Significant Reduction in Perinatal Deaths in Quebec, 1967 to 1973. Press Release (December). Quebec, Canada. Available from: Quebec Perinatal Committee, Ministry of Social Affairs Province of Quebec, 1005 Chemin Ste-Foy, Quebec, Canada, G1S 4N4. Quilligan, Edward, M.D. and Philip Sunshine "Regionalization of Perinatal Care". Report of the Sixty-Sixth Ross Conference on Pediatric Research. Columbus, Ohio: Ross Laboratories. Quilligan, Edward, M.D. "The Obstetric Intensive Care Unit". Hospital Practice 17: 61-69. Reynolds, T. Thompson "The Results of Intensive Care Therapy for Neonates". Department of Pediatrics and Division of Neonatology. University of Minnesota. Journal of Medicine 59. 185Bibliography of Clinical Literature - (Continued) Richardson, Joan C., M.D. 1976 "Principles of Organization of a Neonatal Intensive Care Unit from Scratch". Clinics in Perinatology: Organization for Perinatal Care 3: 329-335. Guest Editor: Louis Gluck, M.D. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders Company. Robert Wood Johnson Foundation 1978 Special Report: Regionalized Perinatal Services, Princeton, NJ: The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Russel, Keith P., M.D., Sprague H. Gardiner, M.D. and Ervin E. Nichols, M.D. 1975 "A Conceptual Model for Regionalization and Consolidation of Obstetrics- Gynecologic Services". American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 121: 756-764. Ryan, George M., Jr., M.D. 1977 "Regional Planning for Maternal and Perinatal Health Services". Seminars in Perinatology: Regionalization of Perinatal Care 1: 255-266. Guest Editor: Leo Stern, M.D. New York: Grune and Stratton. Schlesinger, Edward R., M.D. 1973 "Neonatal Intensive Care Planning and Outcomes Following Care". The Journal of Pediatrics 82: 916-920. Scott, K.E., M.D. 1970 "It's Only Statistics: An Approach to Perinatal Mortality in Nova Scotia". The Nova Scotia Medical Bulletin 81-83. Stetson, John, M.D. and Paul R. Swyer, M.D. 1976 Neonatal Intensive Care. St. Louis, Missouri: Warren H. Green, Inc. Minkowski, A. Section I, "Definition of Intensive Care of the Newborn". Burnard, Eric D. Section II, "Problems in Supplying Intensive Care for a Diverse Community", pp. 12-20. Karlberg, Peter "An Evaluation of Intensive Care of the Newborn: The Necessity for, and Results of Therapy", pp. 21-31. Stern, Leo, M.D. "Neonatal Mortality and Intensive Care in the Province of Quebec", pp. 33-37. Stewart, A. 1972 "Prognosis for Infants of Very Low Birth Weight". London, England: University College Hospital. Stewart, Ann, M.B. and E.O.R. Reynolds, M.D. 1974 "Improved Prognosis for Infants of Very Low Birth Weight". Pediatrics 54: 724-735. 186Bibliography of Clinical Literature - (Continued) Swyer, Paul R., M.D. 1975 "The Organization of Perinatal Care with Particular Reference to the Newborn Neonatology: Pathophysiology and Management of the Newborn. Edited by Gordon B. Avery, M.D., Ph.D., Philadelphia: J.B. Lippincott Company. Swyer, Paul R., M.D. 1970 "The Regional Organization of Special Care for the Neonate". Pediatric Clinics of North America 17: 761-776. Teberg, Annabel, M.D., Joan E. Hodgman, M.D., Paul Y.K. Wu, M.D. and Robert L. Spears, M.D. 1977 "Recent Improvement in Outcome for the Small Premature Infant: Follow- up of Infants with a Birth Weight of Less Than 1,500 Grams". Clinical Pediatrics 16: 307-313. Thogmartin, Bruce and Michael Tyne 1969 "Essential Design Elements of Neonatal Intensive Care Unit". Problems of Neonatal Intensive Care Centers. Edited by Ross Hospital Planning Associates, Ross Laboratories: Columbus, Ohio. Thompson, Theodore, M.D. and J. Reynolds 1977 "The Results of Intensive Care Therapy for Neonates: I. Overall Neonatal Mortality Rates; II. Neonatal Mortality Rates and Long-Term Prognosis for Low Birth Rate Neonates". Journal of Perinatal Medicine 5: 59-75. Usher, Robert H., M.D. 1971 "Clinical Implications of Perinatal Mortality Statistics". Perinatal Biology. Leo Stern, M.D. (guest editor). Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology 14: 885-925. Usher, Robert, M.D. 1977 "Changing Mortality Rates with Perinatal Intensive Care and Regionalization" Seminars in Perinatology: Regionalization of Perinatal Care 1: 309-319. Guest Editor: Leo Stern, M.D. New York: Grune and Stratton. Westbers, Jimmie A., M.D., Dayton W. Clark, M.D. and Gilbert A. Webb, M.D. 1973 "An Evaluation of High-Risk Maternity Care in a Community Hospital". American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 116: 557-563. Zamansky, Harriet and Kathleen Strobel 1976 "Care of the Critically 111 Newborn in An Infant Care Center". American Journal of Nursing 76: 566-568. 187BIBLIOGRAPHY OF HEALTH PLANNING LITERATURE Bergen-Passaic Health Systems Agency 1977 Report on the Task-Force on Regional Perinatal Services in the Bergen-Passaic Health Service Area to the Project Review Committee. Rochelle Park, N.J. Blackmon, Lillian, M.D. and Audrey K. Brown, M.D. 1973 Recommended Standards for Hospital Nursery Services: Plan for a Statewide System of High-Risk Newborn Care. Atlanta, GA: Georgia Regional Medical Program. Comprehensive Health Planning of Northwest Illinois. 1977 Planning Policies for Perinatal High Risk. Rockford, IL. Comprehensive Health Planning Agency of Southeastern Wisconsin, Inc. 1976 Guidelines for Perinatal Services. Milwaukee, WI. Federal Register 1978 National Guidelines for Health Planning: Neonatal Special Care Centers 43 (March 28), Section 121.204: 13040-13050. Florida Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services, Children's Medical Services 1977 Statewide Program for Perinatal Intensive Care Centers: Obstetrical Com- ponent. Tallahassee, FL. Florida, State of, Office of Comprehensive Planning 1978 Health Problem Analysis, A Phase in the Development of the Florida State Health Plan, Infant Mortality. Tallahassee, FL. Florida, State of, Office of Comprehensive Planning 1978 Health Problem Analysis, A Phase in the Development of the Florida State Health Plan, Obstetric Services. Tallahassee, FL. Grand Rapids Emergency Medical Services Symposium on Critical Care Patients 1975 Grand Rapids EMS Symposium on Critical Care Patients: Part III. Systems Approach to the Care of the High Risk Perinatal/Neonatal Patient. Grand Rapids, Michigan. Available from: Emergency Medical Services Clearinghouse, Box 911, Rockville, MD 20852. Health Planning Council, Inc. 1978 Perinatal Care Center Standards (Draft). Madison, WI. Health Systems Agency of Kane, Lake and McHenry Counties 1977 Perinatal Services Support Document. Lake Zurich, IL. Health Systems Agency of San Diego and Imperial Counties 1978 Newborn Intensive Care Study Group, Report to the Planners Committee. San Diego, CA. Illinois Central Health Systems Agency 1977 Health Systems Plan (Perinatal Services Component). East Peoria, IL. 188Bibliography of Health Planning Literature - (Continued) Maine, State of, Comprehensive Planning Agency 1973 Intensive Care of High Risk Newborns in Maine. Augusta, ME. Maryland, State of, Comprehensive Health Planning Agency 1978 Perinatal Services. Baltimore, MD. Massachusetts, Commonwealth of, Department of Public Health, State and Regional Task Force on Neonatal Intensive Care and Technical Advisory Group of the Perinatal Welfare Committee. 1977 Neonatal Intensive Care Standards and Criteria (Draft) Boston, MA. Massachusetts Maternity and Newborn Regionalization Project 1976 The Final Report. Boston, MA. (Available from the Massachusetts Department of Public Health). Michigan, State of, Department of Public Health, Bureau of Health Facilities 1977 Hospital Nurseries and Newborn in Care Services, Minimal Criteria and Guidelines. Lansing, MI. Minnesota State Health Planning and Development Agency 1977 Perinatal Services. St. Paul, MN. Nassau-Suffolk Health Systems Agency, Inc. 1977 A Plan for Regionalization of Obstetrical Services in Nassau-Suffolk. Melville, N.Y. New Jersey, State of, Department of Health 1978 Standards and General Criteria for the Planning, Certification of Need and Designation of Perinatal Services. Trenton, N.J. New Mexico Health Systems Agency. 1976 Toward Improving the Outcome of Pregnancy—Perinatal Care in New Mexico. Sante Fe, N.M. New York, State of, Department of Health 1978 Memorandum—Neonatal Centers for "High Risk" Babies. Albany, NY. . New York, State of, Department of Health 1977 Memorandum—Measuring Value Received for High-Priced Care of Premature Infants. Albany, NY. North Central Health Systems Agency 1978 Specialized Services Review Criteria: Neonatal Special Care Centers (Draft). Atlanta, GA. Ohio Department of Health, Division of Maternal and Child Health, Bureau of Maternal and Child Health. 1977 State Perinatal Guidelines. Ross Laboratories 1977 Planning and Design for Perinatal and Pediatric Facilities. Columbus, Ohio: Ross Laboratories. 189Bibliography of Health Planning Literature - (Continued) Texas, State of, Department of Health 1976 Guidelines for the Texas Regional Perinatal Care System. Austin, TX. West Virginia Planning Committee for Perinatal Health 1976 A Plan to Improve Perinatal Health Care in West Virginia. Charleston, W. VA. Western Center for Health Planning 1976 Certificate of Need Planning and Review Criteria, Intensive Care Newborn Nursery. San Francisco, CA. Wisconsin, State of, Division of Health Policy and Planning 1976 Planning Standards for Perinatal Care Centers. Madison, WI. 190INDEX Accessibility (Travel Time), 120, 143, 147, 152, 172, 173, 174 Average Length of Stay, 44, 45, 57, 135, 145, 148, 166, 173 Bed Need Determination Methods Obstetrics, 14, 44 Neonatal Intensive Care Units, 32, 45, 68, 80, 82, 100, 101, 121, 123, 131, 145-148, 173, 174 Bed/Population Ratio, 43 Birth Projections, 25, 26, 45, 85, 148 Birth Volume, Minimum for Neonatal Unit Service Area Determination, 43, 57, 67, 78, 80, 122, 128, 137, 138, 144, 145, 146, 149, 152, 157, 167, 174 Budget Models Level II, 25 Level III, 25 Communications, 19, 164, 169, 171 Computers, 38 Consolidation of Services, 3, 13, 14, 58 Continuity of Care, 22 Cost Fetal Monitoring Equipment, 18 Neonatal Intensive Care, 44, 58, 59 69, 93, 127, 140, 141, 142, 152, 163 Neonatal Intensive Care Units, 47, 58, 59, 69, 103, 140, 167 Transfer, 32 Cost-Benefit, Cost-Effectiveness of Neonatal Intensive Care, 44 Data, 3, 50, 51, 107, 108, 132, 133, 134 Education in a regionalized Perinatal System, 21, 30, 76, 101, 134, 165, 169 Emergency Medical Services, 30, 31, 62, 63, 129, 132 Equipment, 36, 37, 92, 93, 167, 168 Ethical Issues, 54, 55 Evaluation Of Neonatal Intensive Care, 46, 95, 107, 108, 113, 141, 171, 172 Of Regional Perinatal Systems, 7, 8, 33, 50, 51, 107, 108, 111, 112, 132, 133, 134, 141, 154, 169 Fetal Monitoring, 18 Financial Feasibility, 151, 164 Financing, 6, 7, 63, 64 High-Risk Infant, 10, 20, 49, 52, 122, 129, 130, 162 High-Risk Mother, 39, 49, 90, 122, 138, 162 Laboratory Capabilities, 68, 100 Level I Facility Neonatal Intensive Care Unit Care Capabilities, 3, 5, 86, 91, 99, 153, 156, 170 Personnel Requirements, 3, 21, 117, 153, 157 Referral to Level II or Level III Units, 160 Space Standards, 117 Level II Facility Neonatal Intensive Care Unit Care Capabilities, 3, 5, 86, 91, 99, 157, 170, 171 Components, 100, 158 Personnel Requirements, 21, 118, 158 Space Standards, 118 Level III Perinatal Center, 100, 142, 153, 159, 174 Level III Facility Neonatal Intensive Care Unit Care Capabilities, 5, 00 91, 119, 144, 159, 169, 171, 175, 179 Equipment, 36, 37 Personnel Requirements ;, 25 , 33, 36, 119, 144, 159, 169, 170, 175, 176, 177 Space Standards, 36, 37, 119, 142, 143 Low Birth Weight, 1, 15, 20, 28, 33, 34, 8;, 97, 107, 111 Manpower Needs of Perinatal Programs, 12, 25, 42, 43 Morbidity, 20, 39, 90 Mortality Rate Fetal, 19 Infant, 17, 18, 39, 67, 125, 152 Neonatal, 19, 20, 81, 85, 89, 96, 105, 106, 109, 134, 139, 140 Perinatal, 9. 13, 14, 15, 16, 19, 57, 67, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 90, 106, 109, 110, 111 191Neonatal Intensive Care Clinical Indication for Care, 91, 92, 122 Impact Upon Morbidity and Mortality, 9, 16, 26, 28, 39, 40, 56, 67, 73, 81, 89, 107, 109, 110, 111, 127 Prognoses of Infants Receiving Care, 9, 27, 28, 52, 56, 81, 97, 98, 103 Neonatal Intensive Care Units Care Capabilities, 114, 115 Components, 166 Design, 83, 104, 167 Equipment, 167, 168 Personnel Requirements, 167 Planning, 167 Space Standards, 36, 37, 83 Obstetric/Gynecologic Care, 175 Occupancy Rate 137, 145, 173 Perinatal Systems Planning, 11, 41, 42, 48, 98 Regionalized System Relationships, 2 11, 39, 41, 42, CO 53, 75, 77, 78 83, 84, 98, 99, 101, 109, 110, 136, 171, 175 Population in Need, 68, 82, 166 Transport/Trans fer Arrangements, 66, 78, 135, 140, 151, 154, 165, 171 Cost, 63, 140 Criteria for Maternal, , 35, 64, 65, 66, 102 , 122 Criteria for Newborn, 17, 18, 24, 35, 60, 64, 65, 66, 78, 122, 178 Vehicles, 30, 31, 42, 61, 62, 178 Unit Size, 35, 122, 140, , 145 , 173 Utilization Rates, 101 *U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE: 1979 0— 629-947/2439 REGION 3-1BUREAU OF HEALTH PLANNING Health Planning Series Health Planning Bibliography Series: 1. Selected Bibliographic References for Community Health Status Assessment 2. HRP-0300101 Consumer Participation in Health Planning: An Annotated Bibliography 3. HRP-0300201 Services Shared by Health Care Organizations: An Annotated Bibliography 4'. HRP-0300301 Women and the Health System: Selected Annotated References 5. HRP-0300401 Selected Bibliographic References on Computerized Axial Tomography 6. HRP-0300501 Certificate-of-Need/1122 Project Reviews: A Bibliography 7. HRP-0300601 Community Nutrition in Preventive Health Care Services HRP-0300701 8. Methods for Setting Priorities in Areawide Health Care Planning: An 9. Annotated Bibliography HRP-0300801 Guidelines for Planning Health Services: An Annotated Bibliography 10. HRP-0300901 Emergency Medical Service Systems and Health Planning: A Bibliography 11. HRP-0301001 Mental Health Planning: An Annotated Bibliography HRP-0301101 12. Certificate of Need Programs: A Review, Analysis, and Annotated Bibliography 13. of the Research Literature HRP-0301201 Planning for Outpatient Surgery Services: An Annotated Bibliography 14. HRP-0301301 Health Maintenance Organizations and Health Planning: An Annotated 15. Bibliography HRP-0301401 Hospices and Related Facilities and Services for the Terminally 111: 16. Selected Bibliographic References HRP-0301501 A Review of Planning Methods and Criteria for Neonatal Intensive Care Units: An Annotated Bibliography of the Clinical and Health Planning Literature HRP-0301601US. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, EDUCATION, AND WELFARE Public Health Service Health Resources Administration Bureau of Health Planning National Health Planning Information Center DHEW Publication No. (HRA) 79-14038******** iMitiMV Health Planning Bibliography Series ) n Methods to Determine Geographic/Population Boundaries for Specific Health Services: An Annotated BibliographyHEALTH PLANNING SERIES The Bureau of Health Planning is a primary resource for current information on a wide variety of topics related to health planning. To facilitate the dissemination of this information to health planners, the Bureau issues publications in the following series. Health Planning Methods and Technology This series focuses on the technical and administrative aspects of health planning. Included are such areas as methods and approaches to the various aspects of the health planning process, techniques for analyzing health planning information and problems, and approaches to the effective dissemination and utilization of technical information. Health Planning Information This series presents information on the analysis of issues and problems relating to health planning including trend data, data analysis, and sources of data to support health planning activities. Health Planning Bibliography Bibliographies on specific health planning subjects are published in this series. Subject areas are selected by the frequency of inquiries on specific topics and from suggestions by Bureau staff and health planners throughout the Nation. International Health Planning This series presents information and case studies relating to health planning methodologies and experiences of other nations which are potentially applicable by U.S. health planners. Health Planning in Action Case studies of selected activities of State and local health planning agencies are presented to highlight their achievements in providing "equal access to quality health care at a reasonable cost." "Methods to Determine Geographic/Population Boundaries for Specific Health Services: An Annotated Bibliography" is the seventeenth publication in the Health Planning Bibliography Series. A list of all the publications in this series appears on the inside of the back cover of this publication. Copies may be purchased from the National Technical Information Service (NTIS), Department of Commerce, 5285 Port Royal, Springfield, Virginia 22161.Methods to Determine Geographic/Population Boundaries for Specific Health Services: An Annotated Bibliography Prepared under Contract No. HRA 231-77-0055 by | Government Studies and Systems, Inc.) Philadelphia, Pennsylvania July 1980 HRP-0301 701 o i U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Public Health Service Health Resources Administration Bureau of Health Planning \ DHHS Publication No. (HRA) 80-14013PREFACE In seeking to identify methods to determine geographic/ population boundaries for health services in the health field, in public services, and in the private sector, Government Studies Systems, Inc., conducted an exhaustive survey of the literature during the research phase of Contract No. HRA 231-77-0055. Over 200 relevant refer- ences were identified. This annotated bibliography is being published as a separate volume for the convenience of health planners. The full report is based on extensive analysis of 25 of the most promising methods for solving location/allocation problems. It is entitled: Methods to Determine Geographic/Population Boundaries for Specific Health Services: Part I. State-of-The-Art Report and Part II. Alternative Methods. Both publications will be made available from the National Technical Information Service (NTIS), Springfield, Virginia 22161, (703) 487-4650. The accession number for the bibliography is HRP-0301701; and for the report, HRP-0101901. iii1. Abernathy, William J. and John C. Hershey. "A Spatial-Allocation Model for Regional Health-Services Planning." Operations Research 20(3), May-June 1972, 629-642. In planning for health services, the need arises to determine the location, capacity, and number of health centers for a geographi- cally defined region. The present paper formulates this problem in a form convenient for solution and presents results from the model to clarify some important aspects of this allocation decision. The planning region is assumed to consist of geographically defined subareas or census blocks, of known location. The population is stratified in such a way that each stratum exhibits relatively homogeneous patterns of health care utilization. The model charac- terizes the effects of center locations upon aggregate utilization and utilization of individual centers and gives optimal locations of centers with respect to several alternative criteria. An example illustrating computational feasibility and the implications of various criteria for the location decision is presented. 2. Abler, R., J. S. Adams, and P. Gould. Spatial Organization, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, 1971. Chapter 14 and pp. 330-1. Chapter 14 presents the L-A problem as "Geographers Unsolved Problem." Emphasizes complexity of problem. 3. Barber, Brian K., Michael H. Branson and Riad Mahayni. "Minimizing Travel Time to Hospital Beds in Rhode Island Department of Health, Technical Report No. 10, August 1977 (unpublished). Project was undertaken to answer the question: Given projected total hospital bed need in Rhode Island, maximum and minimum numbers of beds for efficient hospitals, and tertiary level care, what would be the ideal distribution of hospital beds in the State? The problem was formulated as a mixed zero-one linear programming problem, with total travel time for residents to be minimized. The State was subdivided into 25 areas, and certain heuristic assumptions were made about patient travel to reduce the problem to a computation- ally feasible size. Data are required on population, transportation, and hospital bed needs. Results are discussed, as well as possible improvements and refinements. 4. Bell, Colin E., and David Allen. "Optimal Planning of an Emergency Ambulance Service," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences 3(2), 95-101. Queuing theory models are developed for computing the size of emergency ambulance fleet required to meet specified standards of service. As a function of the demand for ambulance service and the distribution of duration of service calls, tables are given for the number of ambulances required to respond immediately to 95 (or 99) percent of service requests. By analyzing a queuing system with 1with unlimited server (ambulance) availability, approximate results to overcome the difficulties of computing steady-state results for a multi-server (ambulance) queuing system are provided. This results in guidelines for determining the size of an ambulance fleet based at a single garage. The extension of the results to more complex situations is also discussed. 5. Bergwall, David F., et al. Introduction to Health Planning Washington, D.C.: Information Resources Press, 1974. This book is written as an introductory textbook and is rather elementary in its approach. Chapter 6 covers "Spatial Aspects of Health Planning." Under "regionalization" it discusses patient origin studies, indexes of relevance and commitment, the "areawide planning" model of Schneider, etc. 6. Berlin, Geoffrey N. and Jon C. Liebman. "Mathematical Analysis of Emergency Ambulance Location," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 8(6), December 1974, 323-328. Proper ambulance location is crucial in saving lives and reducing injury. To determine efficient and effective locations, it is necessary to evaluate both the spatial and temporal distributions of demand. Because of the complex nature of the ambulance response and transport activities, the problem is subdivided into a facility location problem and a vehicle allocation problem. A set covering model is modified to solve the location problem, while a simulation is used to solve the allocation problem. Combining these two models provides a powerful methodology for systematically finding a satisfactory solution to the ambulance location problem. 7. Berlin, Geoffrey N., C. S. ReVelle, and D. J. Elzinga. "Deter- mining Ambulance-Hospital Locations for On-Scene and Hospital Services," Environment and Planning A, 8(5),(August 1976), 553- 561. Network models, incorporating several new impedance measures for the location of ambulances and hospitals are introduced. Although the minimization of average impedance is frequently stated as a criterion in location models, the impedance does not usually embrace more than a single link, such as the time taken from a facility and demand, but also the link from the point of rescue to the point of ultimate service. The return link between the service point and dispatching station is considered as well. Models for the simultaneous location of ambulance dispatching points and hospitals are framed. 8. Berry, B. J. L. (1961) "A Method for Deriving Multifactor Uniform Regions," Przeglad Geograficzny, 33: 263-82. After factor analysis is applied to characteristics of small area units, the factor scores are plotted on a dimensional graph, and 2observations are grouped hierarchially by sequentially joining the two closest points and replacing them by their centroid. The actual measure is the average of squared distance between all possible pairs of points - one for each group. 9. ________ (1967) "Grouping and Regionalizing: An Approach to the Problem Using Multivariate Analysis," in Quantitative Geography Part I, W. L. Garrison and D. F. Marble (eds,), Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois. Suggests a three stage procedure including factor analysis, distance scaling of similarities, and grouping. Several methods of grouping are viewed and their difficulties stated. An extensive bibliography is provided. 9A. Bertolazzi* Paola, Lucio Bianco, and Salvatore Rlcciardelli. "A Method for Determining the Optimal Districting in Urban Emergency Services," Computers and Operations Research, 4 (1977), 1-12. In this paper a method is suggested for dealing with one of the main allocation problems often appearing in urban emergency services, that of districting. A mathematical model is developed in terms of constrained optimization with binary variables. An algorithm, derived from Balas' filter-method, which seems to be quite efficient for this class of problems, has been utilized. The objective function considered here is the overall travel time in the region under consideration. The optimal travel time in the case of the Rome fire service turns out to be meaningfully lower than that derived from the actual situation. Also included is a way of applying the method to the assignment of response areas to the different stations as a function of the current state of the system. 10. Brown, Lawrence A., and John Holmes, "The Delimitation of Functional Regions, Nodal Regions, and Hierarchies by Functional Distance Approaches," Journal of Regional Science 11(1), 1971, 57-72. Following a brief discussion of the concept of region, some of the technical approaches to delimiting functional and nodal regions are reviewed. The approach adopted here is based on the notion of 'functional distance' which, it is suggested, can be directly measured using the mean first passage times (MFPT) of a Markov chain analysis of a flow matrix. The method is described clearly and in detail. Application of the method to the Journey-to-work data (1951) for 107 urban places in Derbyshire, Nottinghamshire, and the West Riding results in the identification of three main functional regions 1) North Midlands containing Nottingham, Derby, Matlock, and Mansfield 2) South Yorkshire with Chesterfield, Sheffield, Doncaster, Barnsley, and Worksop and 3) the West Riding region of Leeds, Bradford, Huddersfield, Halifax, and Wakefield. 3Subsequent analysis of flows within each functional region enables nodal regions to be identified for the major towns. These conform closely to the authors' intituitive knowledge of the nodal structure of the area, a structure which is strongly influenced by the hierarchical organization of settlement and physical features. 11. Bureau of the Census, DIME Geocoding System, Washington, D.C., 1970, 50. The development by the Census Use Study of the DIME (Dual Inde- pendent Map Encoding) geographic base file is described as part of a small-area data research study sponsored in New Haven, Connect- icut, by the Bureau of Census. The report is intended for three audiences: (1) individuals interested in technical developments in geographic coding; (2) organizations within standard metropolitan statistical areas participating in or eligible to use the products of the Census Bureau's address coding guide (ACG/DIME) program; and (3) organizations interested in creating their own DIME file. The introductory chapter describes the Census Bureau's development of a computerized geographic system for use in conducting the 1970 census. The use of census and local data with the DIME file for planning and analysis in the public and private sectors is described. Included are discussions of computer mapping; adding local area codes to the DIME file codes to local records through use of the ADMATCH computer package; network and node analysis; adjacency analysis (including aggregation of areas and clustering of similar areas); and other potential uses, such as monitoring of programs by geographic area, development of parcel files and larger-grained files, information systems, area sampling, geographic grouping of census summary tape data, time series studies, spatial comparisons, and market analysis. The conceptual origins and technical aspects of the DIME system are discussed. The process of creating a DIME file from clerical coding through computer processing is described as are coordinate insertion, updating and maintenance research. Included are cost and staffing considerations. Information on availability of Census Bureau geographic files, the Metropolitan Mapping Series, and data from 1970 census is appended. 12. Bureau of Health Resources Development, Delineation of Economic and Health Service Areas and the Location of Health Manpower Education Programs. A Summary, Bethesda, Md., Division of Manpower Intelligence. February 1974, 36 p. Findings of a study to determine whether the economic system could be used effectively as a surrogate in health planning for the health-care delivery system, and to estimate the interrelationships of the health manpower education system with the economic system and the health-care delivery system are summarized. The methodology used 74 economic variables and 24 health care delivery variables for the same intermountain geographic region characterized by rural conditions and low population density. It was found analytically 4feasible to identify a close relationship between the economic and health care systems in the region. Although the study did not involve the estimating of health needs and the use of time-series data, the empircal results indicated that: (1) the methodology provides meaningful models of the economic and health systems in the intermountain region; (2) the economic system data are easier to obtain than the health-care system data; and (3) given the close relationship of the two systems, the economic system has the potential of being a surrogate for the health-care delivery system. The potential also is suggested for using the economic system as a method for improving the quality of health planning, health man- power planning, and health manpower program and facility planning. 13. Burt, 0. R. and C. C. Harris (1963) "Apportionment of United States House of Representatives: A Minimum Range Integer Solution Alloca- tion Problem," Operations Research, 11: 648-52. A method is proposed for the problem of allocating representatives of States which minimizes the maximum inequality of representation using dynamic programming but suggests a non-integer solution be used as an approximation. An example is given and compared to a standard method of 'equal proportions.' 14. Byfuglien, J. and A. Nordgard, "Region-Building—A Comparison of Methods," Norsk Geografisk Tidsskrift, 27(2), 1973, pp. 153-161. This study deals with the use of quantitative methods to build up uniform or formal regions, the construction of farming-type regions in eastern Norway being used as an example. To achieve reasonable uniformity in the size of the basic areal units, some of the original administrative areas are first combined; the resulting areal units are then described by four orthogonal variables extracted by principal components analysis. Six different methods of aggregating the basic units to form regions are discussed, each method using the same measure of similarity (Dz) between the basic units. The homogeneity of the regions produced by these methods is compared, the Ward's method shown to give the best (although not necessarily the optimal) solution. 15. Calvo, Alberto B., and David H. Marks, "Location of Health Care Facilities: An Analytical Approach," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences 2(5), (October 1973), 407-422. The problem of health facilities location is explored under a mathematical optimization approach. Several models are developed for the location of a generalized health facility system in a region in a manner that the selected criteria are optimized. Locational criteria are structured as a hierarchy of social, economic and political attributes and defined analytically using economic and utility theory. A planning framework, based on the models developed, is presented to aid the health planner in the formulation of health facility location decisions. 516. Carbone, Robert, "Public Facilities Location Under Stochastic Demand," Infor, 12(3), (October 1974), pp. 261-270. This paper extends the current state of public facilities location problems on a road network to cover situations in which the number of users at each node may be a random variable. The basic location model is reformulated as a chance-constrained programming problem with fractile criterion. A computational procedure for solving the non-linear deterministic equivalent problem derived is presented. Finally, a hypothetical numerical example illustrates the possi- bility of changes in the location decision when the stochastic nature of the problem is taken into account. 17. Carr, W. J. (1970) "Economic Efficiency in the Allocation of Hospital Resources: Central Planning vs. Evolutionary Develop- ment," in Empirical Studies in Health Economics, H. Klarman (ed.), Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press, pp. 195-221. Empirical hospital sizes and locations with respect to demand are compared to central planning solutions with hexagonal market areas. Monte Carlo simulation is used. L-A analysis per se does not enter. 18. Carter, Grace M., Jan M. Chaiken, and Edward Ignall, "Response Areas for Two Emergency Units," Operations Research, 20(3) May-June 1972, 571-594. This paper gives a model in which two urban emergency service units (such as fire engines or ambulances) cooperate in responding to alarms or calls from the public in a specified region of a city. Given the home locations of the units and the spatial distribution of alarm rates, it is possible to specify which unit should respond to each alarm by defining a response area for each unit. The average response time to alarms and the workload of each unit are calculated as functions of the boundary that separates their response areas. The boundaries that minimize average response time and the ones that equalize workload are determined. Some bound- aries can be dominated, in the sense that another boundary improves both workload balance and response time. The set of undominated boundaries is found. 19. Casetti, E. (1964) Classifactory and Regional Analysis by Discriminant Iterations, Technical Report No. 12, Computer Applications in the Earth Sciences Project, Department of Geography, Northwestern University. Uses multivariate discriminant procedures which will improve upon an initial classification of regionalization. The heuristic pro- cedure used is the basic 'locate-allocate' heuristic used by many others. The centroid of the cluster is used in the locate phase. The procedure is suggested for evaluating classifications or regionalizations and identifying cores. 620. Castellan, J. W. (1967) "Political Reappointment by Computer," Brown University Computing Review, 1: 5-24. A readable statement of the districting problem and its formulation for algorithm solution. Discusses the Weaver-Hess method and presents the problem as a (0, 1) integer program and as a modified Knapsack problem which is successful on large problems. 21. Chaiken, Jan M., and Richard C. Larson, "Method for Allocating Urban Emergency Units," Management Science, 19(4 Part II) December 1972, p. 110-130. An urban emergency service system provides mobile units (vehicles) to respond to requests for service which can occur at any time and any place throughout a city. This paper describes the common character- istics and operational problems of these systems and surveys the various methods, both traditional and recently developed, which may be used for allocating their units. Aspects of allocation policy discussed include: (1) determining the number of units to have on duty; (2) locating the units; (3) designing their response areas or patrol areas; (4) relocating units; and (5) planning preventive- patrol patterns for police cars. Typical policy changes which may be suggested by the use of quantita- tive allocation models include selective queuing of low priority calls, varying the number of units on duty (and their locations) by time of day, dispatching units other than the closest ones to develop certain incidents, relocating units as unavailabilities begin to develop, and assigning police cars to overlapping patrol sectors. As a result of making such changes, it is often possible to reduce queuing and travel time delays, improve the balance of workload among units, and enhance the amount of preventive patrol where needed. 22. Chapelle, R. A. (1970) Location of Central Facilities, Heuristic Algorithms for Large Systems, unpublished Ph.D. thesis, University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma. Provides a discussion of the history of the continuous space L-A problem noting that current algorithms are prohibitively expensive in time and storage and develops two heuristics - one variable grid method and one variable discrimination method which can cope with very large problems. Cluster analysis is suggested for n dimensional space. Applies algorithms to post office location. The Fortran listings of 6 algorithms are included in the appendices. 23. Cherniack, H. D. and J. B. Schneider (1967) A New Approach to the Delineation of Hospital Service Regions, Discussion Paper No. 16, Regional Science Research Institute, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia. A different approach is used for regionalization in an application to a real problem. One of the relevant indices is based on medians 7which are found by the Newton-Raphson method. A method is proposed for relocating hospitals for a more efficient covering of the population. The approach has been criticized for approximating the demand for services or discrete points (postal zone centroids). 24. Christianson, Jon B., "Evaluating Locations for Outpatient Medical Care Facilities." Land Economics, 52(3), 1967, pp. 299-313. The paper adapts the travel cost approach normally used in evaluating recreation benefits in order to measure the benefits associated with alternative locations for a medical center. An empirical study is described in which demand equations for two different types of medical problems are estimated: first, treatment of a specific illness; and second, preventive medical care taken at the consumer's discretion. The total number of visits to the existing facilities is taken to be the product of the probability of experiencing a particular medical problem and the expected number of visits to the clinic, which in turn is a function of travel cost (including time costs) and a number of other variables including travel cost to alternative facilities, age, income, sex, and family size. Willingness to pay for a new facility is estimated by integrating the mean individual demand for visits in price space between the old and new levels of travel cost. 25. Christofides, N. and P. Viola (1972) "The Optimum Location of Multicentres on a Graph," Operational Research Quarterly, 22: 145- 154. An iterative algorithm is presented for solving the p- centres of a graph, to minimize the maximum distance travelled; and a similar problem of minimizing the number of centres for a critical distance or time. In the absolute p- centre problem the centres need not be at the vertices. The algorithm generates optimal solutions but can also produce suboptimals quickly. 26. Church, Richard, and Charles ReVelle, "The Maximal Covering Location Problem," Papers of the Regional Science Association, 32 (Fall 1974), pp. 101-118. The problem is defined as, "Maximize coverage (population covered) within a desired service distance S by locating a fixed number of facilities." The problem is formulated mathematically, and two algorithms for solving it are described, as is a linear programming solution. A variation of the original problem is stated, "Locate a fixed number of facilities in order to maximize the population covered within a service distance S, while maintaining mandatory coverage within a distance T (T_>S)." This is called the maximal covering location problem with mandatory closeness constraints; its solution is described. 27. Cliff, A. D., and P. Haggett (1970) "On the Efficiency of Alternate Aggregations in Region Building Problems," Environment and Planning, 2: 285-94. 8Discusses the regionalization problem in geography as aggregating small areal units with no continuity constraint and with a complete continuity constraint. The combinatorial size of the problem is stressed and a measure is devised to assess the efficiency of the grouping. They suggest a random partitioning schema where the probability of finding a better grouping is worked out and, if sufficiently small, the procedure terminates. 28. Comprehensive Health Planning Agency of Southeastern Wisconsin, Inc. Health Facilities Geographic Subareas, Milwaukee, March 1973, 41 p. Patterns of utilization of 33 general hospitals in the seven- county southeastern Wisconsin planning area are examined, and geographic subareas are defined which relate groups of general hospitals with the geographic areas containing the population they primarily serve. The planning area incorporates both urban (Milwaukee, Wisconsin) and rural populations. Purposes of identification of geographic subareas for health facilities planning are enumerated, and the use of hospital patient origin data in identifying subareas is described. Factors which limit the applicability of the subarea study are noted. The geographic identifications apply only to inpatient services, allowing service areas for emergency and ambulatory patients to be determined separately. No hospitals outside the planning area were con- sidered in the study, and the influence of area hospitals beyond the boundaries of the planning area was also excluded. Criteria used in selecting optimum subarea configurations from the alter- natives developed in the study are given. Definitions used to distinguish general hospitals from specialty hospitals are noted, and area hospitals are placed into one of these two categories. For each general hospital in the area, the degree of dominance in that hospital's service area, i.e., the percentage of patients in each service area served by each hospital, is discussed. Relationships among hospitals serving similar areas also are discussed. A final subarea grouping, selected on the basis of the degree of compatibility between the service areas of various groups, is described in detail. A profile of each of these nine subareas is provided. Uses of the subareas as basic planning tools are described. Maps and supporting tabular data are included. 29. Corley, H. W., Jr., and S. D. Roberts, "A Partitioning Problem with Applications in Regional Design," Operations Research, 20(5), Sept. - Oct. 1972, 1010-1019. Many problems in two-dimensional location analysis can be formulated as one of optimally dividing a given region into n subregions with specified areas. Examples are problems involving districting, facility design, warehouse layout, and urban plan- ning. This paper contains a study of such a partitioning problem. 9Theoretical results are presented for a problem of optimally partitioning a given set of points in k-dimensional Euclidean space into n subsets, where each subset has a specified Lebesgue measure. The existence of an optimal solution is established, and necessary and sufficient optimal conditions are proved. Models are then formulated in terms of this partitioning problem for specific districting and warehouse-layout problems. 30. Cox, K. R. (1965) "The Application of Linear Programming to Geographic Problems", Tijdschrift Voor Economische en Sociale Geographie, 56: 228-36. Outlines the usefulness of the transportation problem of linear programming to geography. Presents the stepping-stone solution procedure and discusses the dual. Mention is made of the application of the technique to delimit regions. 31. Dean, Robert D., David McKee, and William H. Leahy. Spatial Economic Theory. New York: Free Press, 1970, 365 pp. This book of 20 readings is organized into six parts. An intro- duction presents the partial and general equilibrium approaches. Part I is concerned with least cost theory; Part II with locational interdependence (spatial competition); Part III with market area analysis; Part IV with locational equilibrium analysis; and Part V with general equilibrium theory. Papers included are: "The partial equilibrium approach" - E. M. Hoover; "The general equilibrium approach" - Leon N. Moses; "Distance inputs and the space economy - the locational equilibrium of the firm" - W. Isard; "Location and theory of production" - Leon N. Moses; "A theoretical framework for geographical studies of industrial location" - D. M. Smith; "Stability in competition" - H. Hotelling; "Optimum location in spatial competition" - A. Smithies; "A dissenting view of duopoly and spatial competition" - Nicos E. Devletoglou; "The economic law of market areas" - Frank A. Fetter; "The economic law of market areas" - C. D. Hyson & W. P. Hyson; "The size and shape of the market area of the firm" - Melvin L. Greenhut; "A model of market areas of a firm" - Edwin S. Mills & Michael R. Vav; "Equilibrium of a household" - William Alonso; "Integrating the leading theories of plant location" - Melvin L. Greenhut; "The equilibrium of land use patterns in agriculture" - Edgar S. Dunn, Jr.; "A general location principle of an optimum space economy" - W. Isard; 10"Equilibrium among spatially-separated markets - solution by electric analog" - Stephen Enke; "Spatial price equilibrium and linear programming" - Paul A. Samuelson; "Equilibrium among spatially-separated markets - a reform- ulation" - T. Takauama & G. G. Judge; "Towards a united theory of spatial economic structure" - Edwin Von Boventer. 32. Dearing, P. M., and R. L. Francis, "A Network Flow Solution to a Multi-Facility Minimax Location Problem Involving Rectilinear Distances," ORSA Bulletin, 20, Sup. 2, Fall 1972, B-469. The problem considered is to locate new facilities with respect to existing facilities so as to minimize the maximum cost, where the costs are either proportional to the rectilinear distances between new and existing facilities or proportional to the distances among new facilities. The problem also includes upper bound constraints on the rectilinear distances among facilities. The problem is decomposed into two independent one dimensional minimax location problems. Each subproblem is formulated as an equivalent network weighted flow problem, which is solved by determining a simple chain of maximum cost to weight ratio. 33. Dee, Norbert and Jon C. Liebman, "Optimal Location of Public Facilities," Naval Research Logistics Quarterly, 19(4), December 1972, 753-759. Location of both public and private facilities has become an important consideration in today's society. Progress in solution of location problems has been impeded by difficulty of the fixed charge problem and the lack of an efficient algorithm for large problems. In this paper a method is developed for solving large- scale public location problems. An implicit enumeration scheme with an imbedded transportation algorithm forms the basis of the solution technique. 34. Deighton, D. M. (1971) "A Comment on Location Models," Communi- cation to the Editor, Management Science, 18: 113-15. Deighton is distressed that L-A models are static. He suggests tracing an optimal path through optimal solutions to static problems over the planning horizon. Moves, closings and openings are possible by looking at discounted costs. He also suggests adding confidence intervals on uncertain future demand estimates. 35. Disker, Robert A., William C. Park, Jr. A Method for Delineating Health Service Areas, Bowman Gray School of Medicine, Winston- Salem, NC. Paper presents a method for determining the service area of a health care facility. Patient addresses gleaned from any data 11source which consistently includes this information are plotted by geographic unit of residence. The size of the geographic unit chosen—county, census tract, city block—is dictated by the sophistication of the health service being analyzed. The crude service area obtained by plotting patient addresses against geographic units is refined according to the criteria magnitude of demand and repetition of demand. A geographic unit must provide either 10 percent of the total patients to service or five or more patients to the service during the specified time period to be included in the final trade area. Maps of crude and refined service areas of a 500 bed North Carolina medical center are included to illustrate results of the method. 36. Drosness, Daniel L. and Jerome W. Lubin, "Planning Can be Based on Patient Travel," Modern Hospital, 106, April 1966. Improved planning in hospital services and facilities requires that each institution know what community area it is serving. New research now indicates that it is potentially possible to use routinely collected birth certificate data which identify the movement of patients to hospitals as an estimator of the movement of all inpatients, and for those hospitals not providing obstet- rics that a relatively simple sampling of total patients will suffice. 35A. Donabedian, Avedis, "Capacity to Produce Service in Relation to Need and Demand," Aspects of Medical Care Administration Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1969. This chapter reviews numerous studies which deal with the rela- tionship between geographic assessibility and the use of services and resources, including those that attempt to define more precisely the nature of the mathematical function that describes this relationship. Locational efficiency is defined as the manner in which the location of health resources influences the costs and benefits of receiving and failing to receive health care. Donabedian acknowledges the difficulties in accounting for and measuring different components of locational efficiency, and that, in general, the usually positive relationship between severity of condition, complexity of the resource, and willingness to travel suggests the appropriateness of a centralized or decentral- ized location pattern. The results of several studies dealing with the issue of locational efficiency are also reviewed. 37. Earickson, Robert, A Behavioral Approach to Simulation Models of Patient Use of Physicians and Hospitals: I. Spatial and Social Variables of Hospital Utilization, Chicago Regional Hospital Study, Working Paper #111.11, April 1969. First working paper of a series of three about the effect of spatial, economic, social and perceptual variables on patient utilization of medical services. It is contended that spatial 12interaction patterns of patients and physicians with hospitals cannot be satisfactorily explained by a simple proximity-to-care construct. Besides racial segregation and welfare factors in the health care system, perceived differences in quality of doctors' offices and hospitals, based on architectural factors and religious affiliation, are considered important influences on patient utili- zation. Author outlines data base and methodology of models discussed in the third paper which* described spatial behavior of hospital patients in the Chicago metropolitan area. 38. Earickson, Robert, A Behavioral Approach to Simulation Models of Patient Use of Physicians and Hospitals: II. Spatial and Social Variation in Physician and Hospital Location, Chicago Regional Hospital Study, Working Paper #111.12, May 1969. In this second working paper, the author describes aspects of the location of medical services which affect interactions of patients with physicians and hospitals, and discusses how variations in hospital size, and physician-hospital affiliations affect patient travel, using data concerning 110 Chicago metropolitan hospitals. Findings of this analysis are incorporated in the model presented in the third paper. Some of the major findings are: 1) Hospitals and physicians tend to be closer to each other than either is to the patient - the hospital is often near a cluster of physicians in the business center; 2) A majority of patients travel only three to five miles to a hospital; 3) There is evidence of a hierarchical spatial structure of hospital distribution in the Chicago area according to hospital size and speciality type. 39. ___________, A Behavioral Approach to Simulation Models of Patient Use of Physicians and Hospitals: III. Deterministic and Behavioral Simulation Models of Patient Use of Physicians and Hospitals, Chicago Regional Hospital Study, Working Paper #111.13, June 1969. Third paper of the series presents a two-stage deterministic and behavioral simulation model of patient use of physicians and hospitals. Demographic, social and economic data for 1965 were compiled and disaggregated for 206 "health care areas" in Chicago. Also, data for a 1965 patient discharge survey in 119 Chicago hospitals were used. Metropolitan physicians' office were arbi- trarily grouped into 250 clusters, and straight line distances between community areas, physicians' clusters and hospitals were computed. In phase one, the model took into account behavioral and economic factors and a random element of choice to replicate the health care system. The model allocated patients to physician attraction. Doctors were shifted from one cluster to another to achieve an average patient-per-doctor ratio, realizing patient travel savings. In phase two, a more realistic replication of the system, physician offices were held constant, and excess patients shifted to the nearest cluster. Differences in travel costs 13between phase one and two are a measure of the inefficiency of the present system. Model then repeats the process of phases one and two for patient-to-hospital patterns, also allowing for reli- gious preferences rerun, and relaxing racial and charity constraints, which results in even greater patient travel savings. Findings indicate there is a need for some shift in physician and hospital capacity and a relaxation of income and racial barriers. 40. Eddleman, B. R., "Areawide Planning for Optimum Location of Hospital Facilities for Rural People," Southern Journal of Agri- cultural Economics, 4(1), July 1972, 29-95. Paper presents a conceptual model permitting minimization of combined patient travel costs and health service production costs with economies of size affecting the level of production costs. Model was applied to a nine-county area surrounding Gainesville, Florida, to estimate the optimum number, size, location of the hospital facilities and total regional access costs for projected additional health service requirements. It was concluded that the model has possibilities for aiding in areawide planning of present and future developments in the health services industry. 41. Ellwein, Leon B., and John T. Kalberen, Jr., Optimal Location of Cancer Centers on the Basis of Population Access." Federation Proceedings, 34 (8), May 1975, 1411-1416. The National Cancer Center Institute initiated a project in the early 1960s in response to a need for interdisciplinary cancer research and coordinated care for cancer patients. The Institute considered a large number of factors regarding the establishment of comprehensive cancer centers and believed that the geographical location should ensure that the maximum benefits of the centers should be received by the largest proportion of people. The approach used to assess the number and location of centers is based upon the adaptation of a mathematical model and a computer program designed for the solution of general "location-allocation" problems. The objective of the analysis was to minimize costs expressed in terms of transport distance. The population of the United States was divided into distinct areas based on the boundaries of the 435 congressional districts, together with Washington, D.C., and Puerto Rico. The total number of potential centers was calculated by establishing a series of additional centers to complement existing ones. Sixteen sites had already been selected and the remaining series of 21 potential sites was analyzed. Travel distance was determined so that centers should not be more than 1,000 miles away from each congressional district, to be able to serve a population effectively. Since accessibility increases directly with the total number, an analysis was made to establish the point at which population access is offset by the cost of setting up an additional center. 1442. El-Shaieb, A. M., "A New Algorithm for Locating Sources Among Destinations," Management Science, 20(2) (October 1973), 221-231. The problem considered is the location of m sources among n locations (m