Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2011 with funding from LYRASIS members and Sloan Foundation http://www.archive.org/details/crossedcornOOjone Bulletin 273 January, 1926 (Euuurrttrut Agricultural iExurrtmrut ^tattuu £faw ijatiftt, Qlomiprttrut Crossed Corn s Bulletin 273 January, 1926 tToJO Qlontiprttntt Agrtrultural {Expmmrttt Station N* ro lHaupn, (EDuttrrttrut CROSSED CORN D. F. JONES P. C. MANGELSDORF The Bulletins of this Station are mailed free to citizens of Connecticut who apply for them, and to other applicants as far as the editions permit. CONNECTICUT AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION OFFICERS AND STAFF January, 1926 BOARD OF CONTROL. His Excellency, John H. Trumbull, cx-officio, President. Charles R. Treat, Vice-President Orange George A. Hopson, Secretary Mount Carmel Wm. L. Slate, Jr., Director and Treasurer New Haven Joseph W. Alsop Avon Elijah Rogers Southington Edward C. Schneider Middletown Francis F. Lincoln Cheshire Administration. Chemistry. Analytical Laboratory. Biochemical Laboratory. Botany. Entomology. Forestry. Plant Breeding. Soil Research. Tobacco Sub-station at Windsor. STAFF. E. H. Jenkins, Director Emeritus. Wm. L. Slate, Jr., B.Sc, Director and Treasurer. Miss L. M. Brautlecht, Bookkeeper and Librarian. Miss J. V. Berger, Stenographer and Bookkeeper. Miss Mary E. Bradley, Secretary. G. E. Graham, In charge of Buildings and Grounds. E. M. Bailey, Ph.D., Chemist in Charge. K. h. Andrew, M.A. C. E. Shepard Owen L. Nolan V Assistant Chemists. Harry J. Fisher, A.B. W. T. Mathis J Frank C. Sheldon, Laboratory Assistant. V. L. Churchill, Sampling Agent. Miss Mabel Bacon, Stenographer. T. B. Osborne, Ph.D., Chemist in Charge. G. P. Clinton, Sc.D., Botanist in Charge. E. M. Stoddard, B.S., Pomologist. Miss Florence A. McCormick, Ph.D., Pathologist. Willis R. Hunt, Ph.D., Assistant in Botany. A. D. McDonnell, General Assistant. Mrs. W. W. Kelsey, Secretary. W. E. Britton, Ph.D., Entomologist in Charge; State Ento- mologist. B. H. Walden, B.Agr. ) M. P. Zappe, B.S. V Assistant Entomologists. Philip Carman, Ptt.D. ' Roger B. Friend, B.S., Graduate Assistant. John T. Ashworth, Deputy in Charge of Gipsy Moth Work. R. C. Botsford, Deputy in Charge of Mosquito Elimination. Miss Gladys M. Finley, Stenographer. Walter O. Filley, Forester in Charge. H. W. Hicock, M.F., Assistant Forester. Miss Pauline A. Merchant, Stenographer. Donald F. Jones, S.D., Geneticist in Charge. P. C. Mangelsdorf, S.D., Assistant Geneticist. M. F. Morgan, M.S., Investigator. George D. Scarseth, B.S., Graduate Assistant. Paul J. Anderson, Ph.D., Pathologist in Charge. N. T. Nelson, Ph.D., Assistant Physiologist. THE TUTTLE, MOREHOUSE & TAYLOR COMPANY CROSSED CORN D. F. Jones and P. C. Mangelsdorf. Vigorous, sturdy plants, a good sound ear on every stalk, no weak and spindling plants, few nubbins or moldy ears. These are some of the outstanding characteristics of crossed corn. It is all these desirable features combined that enable this new kind of corn to outyield the old standard varieties, year after year, and under all sorts of conditions. Crossing two distinct types of animals or of plants almost always causes an increase in vigor. This has long been known and used in the production of mules, sterile hybrids of the horse and the ass. Swine breeders often utilize the beneficial effects of hybrid vigor by crossing different breeds of pigs, feeding for market the hybrid offspring but not breeding from them. The same principle can be used in increasing the yield of corn and the Connecticut Agricultural Experiment Station has been working for many years to find the best methods of utilizing hybrid vigor and to produce strains of corn for crossing that give high yields adapted to the cultural and market requirements of this region. Several promising types of crossed corn have now been pro- duced, of which stock seed is available for seed growing. Other types are now being developed to meet different requirements and these will soon be available for distribution. The uniform production from every plant, though the most important feature, is only one of the desirable characteristics of crossed corn. The ears are more even in size and shape, there are fewer nubbins, poorly developed ears and moldy corn. Many combinations show appreciably less smut and root rot infection. The stalks themselves are sturdy and strong and stand up when other plants are laid low by wind and rain. In time of tasseling and silking the crossed plants are far more even than ordinary varieties and in ripening there is the same remarkable uniformity. In crossed sweet corn this uniformity in time of ripening is a very valuable feature for the market gardener or canner. It enables the grower to harvest his crop at one time and have practically all of the ears ready to be picked. This results in a better quality of canned or table corn, because fewer immature and over-ripe ears are included. The uniform size of the ears is also particularly desirable in the case of sweet corn. It makes for a more attractive product and is a feature that appeals especially to the restaurant trade. 154 CONNECTICUT EXPERIMENT STATION BULLETIN 273 SEED SELECTION. The uniformity of crossed corn, its evenness in ripening, its increased productiveness, the greater freedom from disease, cannot be obtained by any of the usual methods of seed selection in naturally-pollinated fields of corn. Fig. 1. — Vigorous, sturdy plants with a good ear characteristic of crossed corn. >n every stalk are One may go through a field or crib of corn, picking out the largest and finest ears, discarding all poorly filled and moldy ears and keeping only the one best ear out of every thousand, and yet these choice specimens do not reproduce their excellence ; they do not "breed true." No matter how fine in appearance are the ears which are planted, they always give many weak plants and non-producers. The failure of the finest ears to reproduce themselves has several causes. It is due, in part, to the fact that many of the best CROSSED CORN '55 ears are good, not because of their heredity but because of the especially favorable situation in which they grew. It is solely Fig. 2. — In size and shape of ear and in time of ripening there is a remarkable uniformity. their environment that has made them better than the average and the effects of environment, we now know, can not be passed on to later srenerations. »56 CONNECTICUT EXPERIMENT STATION BULLETIN 273 The main reason, however, that the selected ears do not breed true lies in the fact that the pollen which produced their seeds came from all sorts of plants. Every silk must receive pollen in order for a seed to develop. The pollen is shed by the tassels and good, poor and indifferent plants alike send their pollen into the air where it is mixed by the wind and carried to all parts of the corn field. The choicest ear in the entire field has received part of its pollen from some of the poorest neighbors. Fig. 3. — The plants grown from the small ears were just as large and the yield of shelled grain was the same as from the large seed ears. This constant inter-crossing and hereditary mixing going on in every corn field has brought about a condition whereby every plant is a hybrid of greater or less degree of complexity and the off- spring of hybrids are usually diverse and seldom like their parents. Moreover, corn has been naturally crossed in this way for count- less years and is dependent upon hybrid vigor to produce its largest yield. In spite of the natural crossing which is constantly going on, it is possible by ordinary field selection, patiently practiced, year after year, to bring about an improvement in certain respects. By saving for seed only the ears from the earliest ripening plants one may in time develop a variety that will mature somewhat CROSSED CORN 157 earlier. By choosing plants with many ears, the average number of ears per stalk can be gradually increased. Noticeable changes can be made in the number of rows of grain on the ear, the size and shape of the ear or the type of kernel. Selection of this kind is usually made with some definite aim of adapting the variety more perfectly to the purpose for which it is grown. Such alterations are seldom accompanied by any increase of yield and often, particularly where extreme earliness is sought, productiveness is lowered. Tests carried out at many places have shown that the prize winning ears at the corn shows often yield no more than unselected ears that are much less desirable in appearance. This fact is brought out in the accompanying illustration. Plants grown from the nubbins at the right were just as strong as those produced by the good ears shown on the left. The ears were fully as large and the yield of shelled corn was exactly the same. In this case the difference in appearance of the two lots of seed ears was not due to heredity but merely to the conditions in the field in which they grew, the one in a good situation, the other in a poor one. THE EAR-TO-ROW METHOD OF SELECTION. When the seed from a number of ears of corn are planted sep- arately, each in a row by itself, some lots grow better and yield considerably more than others. It was formerly thought that by selecting seed from the high producing rows or planting the remain- ing seed from the best yielding mother ears, and continuing this process from year to year, an increase in yield could be obtained. A marked increase in yield is sometimes obtained the first year or two but extensive tests have shown that the differences are not permanent and that in later generations the yield from the orig- inally high producers is no more than that obtained from the unselected seed. The failure of the high producing ears to maintain their increased yields is probably due to their hybrid composition. They split up and lose vigor in later generations. Selection towards a single type also brings about a certain amount of inbreeding which always weakens the plants. HYBRID VIGOR. Crossing somewhat different but related forms of plants or animals results in greater growth, the offspring often being better than either parent. Blue-gray cattle have long been used for beef in Scotland. They are the result of crossing a white Short- horn bull and black Gallowav or Angus cows. The large growth. '58 CONNECTICUT EXPERIMENT STATION- BULLETIN 273 early maturity and fine beef quality has given this breed cross an enviable reputation whereever beef cattle are raised. The Carolina poplar is a thrifty, fast-growing - tree that succeeds well in nearly all parts of the country. It is considered to be a Fig. 4. — Two dwarf types of corn give an astonishing result when crossed. natural hybrid between the Cottonwood of our western plains and the European Black poplar. A valuable feature of this tree is the ease with which it can be grown from cuttings. Its vigorous nature is thus easily maintained while at the same time the trees are multiplied in numbers. Hybrid vigor is usually responsible for part of the value of most vegefatively propagated plants. As long as they are not CROSSED CORN *59 reproduced from seeds the stimulus to increased growth is main- tained undiminished. In naturally cross-pollinated plants it is necessary to keep up a constant intercrossing in order to maintain full vigor. The corn plant is so constructed with its tassel, the pollen- bearing structure, at the top of the stalk, that it can be easily detasseled before pollen is shed, thereby entirely preventing self- fertilization. Fifty years ago a method was outlined whereby two varieties of corn could be crossed by planting them in alternat- Fig. 5. — The corn plant is so constructed that it can easily be crossed by planting in alternating rows and detasseling all of the plants of one kind before pollen is shed. ing rows and pulling out all the tassels of one variety before pollen is shed. All of the seeds borne on such emasculated plants must result from cross-pollination of one variety with another. Numerous tests have shown that an increased yield often results when certain varieties of different type, such as flint and dent, are crossed. Some varieties of corn from China when crossed with native varieties have given considerably larger yields than either parent. Crossing an early variety with a late variety sometimes gives a cross-bred progeny that yields as much as the later parent and is appreciably earlier. Varieties of similar type when com- bined have not given much better results than either parent. The increased yields which are obtained come only the first year after crossing. To get the benefit of hybrid vigor in plants reproduced by seeds it is necessary to make the cross each year and plant only the crossed seed. Any improvement in yield or i6o CONNECTICUT EXPERIMENT STATION BULLETIN 273 in other respects must be great enough to repay the extra cost of producing seed in this way. Variety crosses, while better than their parental stocks in some cases, have not, apparently, offered sufficient improvement to induce corn growers to make a practical application of this method. Fig. 6. — The result of seven generations of inbreeding. INBREEDING BEFORE CROSSING. A larger increase in yield together with a much greater uni- formity and fixity of type is obtained by first inbreeding corn by artificial hand pollination for several years and then crossing two different inbred strains. This is shown in the accompanying illustration. A variety of Learning which yielded 96 bushels per acre was inbred, that is, the silks were artificially pollinated with pollen from the same plants. After five years of inbreeding two strains, one of which had been reduced in yield to 32 bushels per acre, the other to 20 bushels, were crossed. The first genera- tion cross of these two low yielding, inbred strains produced 115 bushels, an increase of twenty per cent over the original variety, under the same conditions. Not only did this hybrid exceed the original variety by twenty per cent in yield but the corn was of better quality. The ears were all closely alike in size and shape and all matured at practically the same time. Every stalk bore a good ear and there were fewer moldy ears, nubbins and less soft corn. CROSSED CORN l6l Here is a marked improvement secured by crossing. Unfor- tunately this particular cross and many other combinations made in the early years of these experiments were not well adapted to Connecticut conditions. The plants ripened too late to make a satisfactory corn for husking and the stalks were not large enough to make a good silage variety. Also the low yields and poor quality of the inbred strains made it practically impossible to produce crossed seed in quantity and at a price that would justify its use. At the present time every effort is being made at this station and throughout the corn-growing states to produce inbred strains that Fig. 7. — The two inbred strains were derived from the variety on the left and gave the result on the right when crossed — 115 bushels per acre. will give hybrid combinations well adapted to the local needs and which will be themselves sufficiently vigorous and productive to make the growing of crossed seed commercially profitable. Other methods of utilizing inbred strains of corn are being developed. Crossed corn seed has now been grown in Connecticut five years and tested long enough to show its possibilities. Two crosses of inbred strains outyielded all varieties in the Iowa corn yield contest in 1924 in the south central section. One of the inbred strains used in one of these crosses was developed at this station. A combination of four inbred strains known as Double Crossed Burr-Learning has been tested for five years in comparison with the highest yielding varieties grown in this part of the country with the following results : r-Bushels of shelled corn per acre—-, Highest Yielding Varieties D. C. Burr-Leaming . Beardsley's Learning . Luce's Favorite Webber's Dent Northern White Dent Century Dent 1018 i