/ .4S221 ,. *$m?ML SMALL J FOREST PRODUCTS LABORATORY 1 FOREST SERVICE U. S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE SAWMILL IMPROVEMENT PRACTICAL POINTERS TO FIELD AGENCIES J// -Q^ - /^/i^/. £ - "? ■OSITORY ME'A TO MOVE PORTABLE M ILLS The number of teams required to complete the chance can serve as a rough control for figuring out when to move portable mills in- logging chances offering more than one set-up. This applies to "not log" operations dependent on daily renewal rather than a reserve of logs at the mill. Fewer teams are needed when logging near the mill hut zones are reached where either more teams or new set-ups are essential. It is a case of balancing the cost of moving against the extra team cost and making allowances for the influence of the moves on lumber hauling costs. The cost of moving within the chance may be as low as $12 for light tractor mills to $800 for the more stationary mills. The operator estimates the cost for his conditions. If the proposed move increases the lumber haul costs he adds the estimated increase; if it cheapens them he subtracts from the mill moving cost and divides the result by the cost per day per team. .Is gives the number of days he can afford to use an extra team to clean up Ihe chance from tne first set-up. or, if several set-ups are possible, gives the extra team-days justified in extending the logging zone before moving. This method is reasonably practical in a flat, accessible area where mills can be set up almost anywhere on the chance and lumber bo hauled out. Some changes are needed for a rough region. Mill sites are defi- nitely limited and logs will not be brought up hill. The initial set-up is along the lower part of the chance. After hauling from tne short haul area additional teams may be required to haul from back areas and up to the next site. The next set-up gives another series of team requirements* To deter- mine the advisability of moving, the operator figures the difference in the estimated number of teaming days* required to haul tnose logs to the old set- up which are tributary to the new set-up and teaming days to haul tne same to the new, multiplies by the cost per team per day, and subtracts the cost of moving. The influence of the prospective move on tne lumber hauling coots is handled as in calculating moves in a flat region; the estimated increase added or decrease subtracted from tne cost of moving the mill. A minus answer indi- cates no move is advisable, and a plus answer gives the estimated gain result- ing from the move. For instance, hauling is at a point where logs are tributary to either the present site or a new one. The operator estimates that four teams will take twenty days or eighty teaming days to haul to the present site all logs tributary to the new, and two teams twenty days or forty teaming days hauling them to the new, or a difference of forty teaming days. A team costs $7 per day. He can move the mill for $50 and the increase in cost of hauling out lumber will bo $100. He stands to gain 40 x $7 or $230 and to lose $160 or a net gain of $120 through moving. ♦Equivalent to the number of days required for one team to log the chance. Contributed by C. J. Telford, Forest Products Laboratory , t R899-3 Jan. 15, 1931. t Maintained at Madison, Wisconsin in cooperation with the University of Wisconsin •See outline in Small Sawmill Improvement Working Plan, March 1930, for explanation of indexing system proposed. UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA 3 1262 09216 3178 / f I