/A^n . ^ ; II GOVERNMENT CROP REPO. Sources of Informai Methods of Preparation and Checking Demonstrated Accuracy UNlV OF Fl l'B. n nruMgNTS PERT SITORY ''ashingloii, D. C. Circular 17. Revised January. 1913 U. S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE BUREAU OF CROP ESTIMATES LEON M. ESTABROOK Chkf GOVERNMENT PRINTINQ OFFICE : 1918 ORGANIZATION AND OFFICIALS OF THE BUREAU OF CROP ESTIMATES. Statistician and Chief: Leon M. Elstabrook. Assistant Statistician and Assistant Chief: Nat C. Murray. Chief Clerk: Charles E. Gage. Division of Crop Reports: Edward Crane, Chief. Division of Crop Records: Frank Andrews, Chief. Field Service: S. A. Jones, Chief. Statistical Scientists: George K. Holmes, Charles M. Daugherty, and Fred J. Blair. Crop Reporting Board: Leon M. Estabrook, Chairman; Nat C. Murray, S. A. Jones, Frank Andrews, George K. Holmes, and one or more fieid agents called in from the field force. 2 GOVERNMENT CROP REPORTS. r^ROP ESTIMATES which are reHable and un- ^•^ biased are important not only to agriculture but also to all those industries which depend upon agri- cultural products. Public appreciation of accurate crop reports is increasing, owing largely to improved methods of marketing and distribution, and to a wider public interest in food and feed which has developed since the beginning of the European War. The follow- mg statement gives the essential facts regardmg the organization of the Bureau of Crop Estimates, its sources of information, and the accuracy of its crop estimates. THE MEN WHO SUPPLY INFORMATION ABOUT CROPS. Systematic care and scientific thoroughness charac- terize the preparation of the Government crop reports, but these would be useless without an efficient organiza- tion and dependable sources of information. The Washtngion force. — To begm with, the central office of the Bureau of Crop Estimates, at Washington, has approximately 135 employees, most of them statis- tical clerks, computers, and trained statisticians expe- rienced in handling and interpreting agricultural facts, from whatever source they may be gathered. Field agents. — Distributed over the country are 42 salaried field agents, one in each State or group of small States. These field agents are in the classified civil service and are appointed only after passing a rigid civil- service examination to test their educational and statis- tical qualifications. Before they are permitted to take the civil-service examination they must show that they have had at least five years' practical experience in farming, an education equivalent to a four-year course in an agricultural college or at least three years' responsible practical experience in work involving statistical methods or statistical inquiry. They must also be legal residents of the States to which they are assigned. These agents are all men of high character, qualified by training and exp>erience for their work, competent judges of crop 3 4 Government Crop Reports. production, and familiar with local conditions in their States. Each is required to travel over his State sys- tematically during the crop season and personally to inspect crops, interview farmers, representatives of com- mercial houses, mills, elevators, buying and selling associations of all kinds, transportation companies. State and local authorities, and associations of every descrip- tion; in fact, each is expected to be better informed on crop production than any other man in the State. Each agent enlists the voluntary services of from 250 to 1,500 selected crop correspondents in his State, who report to him every month regarding the crops grown in the State. At the close of each month the agent makes up a detailed estimate on the crops in his territory and forwards it to the Washington office, with full explanatory notes show- ing the causes which have resulted in changes from the estimates for the previous month. The field agent, because of his constant travel and observation, his thorough study and analysis, and his interviews with and continuous reports from many of the most competent judges of crops, has a thorough knowledge of the crop situation in his State. Crop specialists. — In addition to the regular field agents, the bureau employs 10 crop specialists, 1 each for cotton, rice, and tobacco, 4 for truck crops, and 3 for fruit crops. These crop specialists are of the same high character, experience, and educational qualifica- tions as the field agents, and each devotes his entire time to investigating the single crop for which he is responsible. They travel throughout the regions in which their special crops are grown, maintain large lists of growers, and each is regarded as an authority on the statistics of his special crop. Lists are kept of growers of special crops, who report at the close of each month to the respective crop specialists, each of whom, in tum, makes up a report and forwards it to the central office in Washington. County crop reporters. — A third class of reporters are the voluntary county crop reporters, approximately 2,800 in number, each of whom reports for his county each month on printed schedules directly to the bureau. The county reporters base their estimates upon personal observation and inquiry and upon written and telephonic reports to them from aids in different portions of the county. Government Crop Reports. 3 Township crop reporters. — A fourth source of informa- llon is the voluntary township reporters, one for each agricultural township in the United States, approximately 30,220 in number. These township reporters are nearly all practical farmers and each reports on the crops grown in his immediate neighborhood directly to the central office in Washington monthly throughout the year. Special lists of growers, buyers, and others. — Addi- tional sources of information exist in the bureau's special lists of growers of potatoes, apples, cotton, beans, cran- berries, peanuts, broom com, maple sirup, honey, cpecial truck crops, and live stock, and in other lists of buyers, dealers, mills and elevators, producers and shipping associations, and other agencies engaged in the handling, transporting, storing, and distribution of crops. The total number of voluntary crop reporters is approxi- mately 1 50.000. HOW THE CROP INFORMATION IS TABU- LATED IN WASHINGTON AND THE CROP REPORTS MADE UP. The returns from each class of reporters are tabulated and averaged separately as a check one against the other. The county totals are weighted; that is, a county which produces five times as much of a particular crop as another receives five times the importance or "weight" of the other county in determining the average for that crop. Every possible precaution is taken to prevent the totals for any of the so-called speculative crops, such as corn, wheat, oats, barley, rye, cuid cotton, from becoming known to any individual prior to the date fixed in advance by the Secretary of Agriculture for the issuance of the crop report. Even the tabulators and computers who make up the totals do not knov.' the States to which they pertain, and the final telegraphic reports and comments of the field agents relating to the speculative crops are kept locked in the office of the Secretary until crop- reporting day, when they are tumed over to a Crop Reporting Board, and the entire board is immediately locked in until the minute that the refx)rt is issued, guards being stationed at the doors, and all telephones discon- nected. 6 Government Crop Reports. The data supplied by the field agents, crop specialists, and various classes of voluntary crop reporters are con- , sidered by the Crop Reporting Board, composed of the I chief of bureau, the assistant chief of bureau, the chief of the division of crop report*, two statistical scientists, and one or more field agents called in from different States each month, all of whom are expert judges of crops and have had many years' exnerience in analyzing, inter- _ preting, and summarizing crop data. In addition to the I special data sent in each month by the field force, the Crop Reporting Board has all other data which are available, such as the Weather Bureau reports, and such crop reports as are issued by State authorities, private crop-estimating agencies, associations, and others. From all these data each member of the board prepares his own individual and independent estimate for each crop and State. 1 hese are compared, discrepancies are dis- cussed and explained, and a final figure is adopted by the board. It is quite certain, therefore, that the Crop Reporting Board has before it more complete, detailed, and accurate data upon which to base its report than any other crop-estimating agency in the world. The members of the Crop Reporting Board are unbiased, because they, as well as all other employees of the depart- ment who have anything to do with the crop estimates, are prohibited by law, under ver}' severe penalties, from speculating in any product of the soil, from giving out any information in advance of the official crop report, and from knowingly compiling or issuing any false statistics. HOW REPORTS OF OTHER AUTHORITIES PROVE THE ACCURACY OF THE CROP REPORTS. Wherever it is has been possible to secure an absolute check, the crop reports of the Department of Agricul- ture have usually been found to be surprisingly accurate. Unfortunately, absolute checks are afforded at only long intervals or for only a few crops, or for only a few States. The principal checks which are available are as follows: The census reports every 10 years. — The census reports afford the most complete and authoritative crop statistics available. They are especially valuable because they cover acreage and production of all crops and different Government Crop Reports. 7 classes of live stcx:k. Theoretically they are actual enumerations and are presumed to be accurate. Actually, so far as t^ey relate to agriculture, they are estimates, though based upon a larger number ot returns than the crop reports ot the Bureau of Crop Estimates. Their value is impaired somewhat by the long period of time between censuses, the delay in printing the reports after a census is taken, the different dales of reporting num- bers of different classes of live stock, and the fact that different methods of editing (correcting or omitting imperfect retums) are adopted at different censuses. Because of the imperfect retums and methods of dealing with them, the agricultural totals of the census of 1900 were generally too high or those ot the census of 1910 were generally too low. The deficiencies of the last census are recognized and discussed by the Director ot the Census in his annual report for 1 9 1 2. A comparison of the estimates of the Bureau of Crop Estimates with the past census shows that they are in closer agreement than are the crop reports or tax assessors' retums in most of the States, and certainly far more nearly in agreement than the estimates made by private agencies. The annual census reports of cotton ginned. — The Bureau of the Census is required by law to report every bale of cotton that is ginned. These reports, therefore, afford an absolute check on the estimates of the Depart- ment of Agriculture for cotton. Reports of State boards of agriculture and returns of tax assessors. — Many of the States have boards ot agri- culture or commissioners of agriculture who issue crop reports at v.-^.rious intervals, and some of the States have tax assessors' retums of crops and live stock. These reports and retums would be extremely valuable as checks upon the crop estimates of the Department of Agriculture if they covered all crops and classes of live stock, if they were based upon complete and accurate data, if they were systematically prepared by competent, well-trained, and experienced statisticians, if they were issued every year and promptly, and if the retums were made as of the same day in all the States. Unfortu- nately this is not the case. Though in a few of the Slates an attempt is made to meet the standard indicated, in most of the States the tax assessors retums are incom- plete, are rendered after long delays, and relate only to certain crops and omit certain classes ot live stock. The 8 Government Crop Reports. returns in different States are made on different dates, and in some States the retums are not published at all or not until long after the close of the crop year to which they pertain. In most of the States the officials in charge of the crop statistics are not selected because of any special fitness for the work, and in practically all of the States the personnel is subject to frequent changes. The fact that the State reports can not be used as a satisfactory check upon the crop estimates of the Department of Agriculture is readily apparent by comparing them with the decennial census. However, while the crop totals reported in some States can not be accepted as numerically accurate, they are of value in showing the trend of crop acreages and production from year to year; i. e., they show in a general way whether the acreages plemted to different crops and the numbers of different classes of live stock on farms are increasing or decreasing from year to year, and to what extent they can be used as a check upon the estimates of the Department of Agriculture. All crop reports and statistics issued by State authorities are obtained as soon as published by the Bureau of Crop Estimates, and the totals of the tax assessors' retums are taken off from the State records by the field agents of the bureau annually. These reports and tax data are carefully analyzed and checked against the Government reports by the Crop Reporting Board. Private estimating agencies. — A number of private crop-reporting bureaus make a business of preparing estimates of the acreage and production of the so-called speculative crops, corn, wheat, oats, rye, barley, and cotion, and a few other crops, and many cf the larger firms which deal in these products employ crop experts at high salaries to keep them supplied with timely crop information. Many producing associations which are interested in special crops, such as apples, peaches, potatoes, and the like, also prepare estimates from time to time based on reports of their members. A number of farm journals and trade papers also publish crop esti- mates of their owr, based upon various sources of infor- mation, principally from their subscribers. Though many of these agencies employ men who are experienced in judging crops and their estimates frequently are very accurate, it is nevertheless true that few, if any, of them have the facilities for collecting reliable data of crop production at all comparable with those ot the Bureau Government Crop Reports. 9 of Crop Estimates, and their estimates often show the effect of bias. Practically all of these estimates are available to the bureau, either directly or through its field agents, frequently before publication. They are deemed of value as representing the consensus of opinion of the "trade" and in most cases tend to confirm the accuracy of the Bureau of Crop Estimates. Returns from mills, etcoators, andstoraje warehouses. — If complete returns were available for quantities of grain, applet, potatoes, etc., stored in all the mills, ele- vators, and warehouses of the country during the season, they would afford an excellent check upon estimates of crop production, but such returns as are available are very incomplete. Some State laws require that products held in storage shall be reported {periodically to the State authorities, and where such reports are available they are utilized by the Bureau of Crop Estimates. Unfor- tunately many States do not require the reporting ot products in storage, and there is no way of ascertaining the quantities held in those States. The Bureau of Markets in the Department of Agriculture is rapidly developing a system of ascertaining and reporting quan- tities of perishable products, such as apples, potatoes, meats, butter, and eggs held in storage warehouses. The reports issued by the Bureau of Markets will become increasingly valuable as checks on estimates of production. In the case of rice, the mills which handle all of this product that is not retained by growers for seed are com- paratively few in number, and it is possible to make a complete canvass of them. Their total receipts in any year plus a conservative estimate of the quantity retained by growers for seed make an excellent check on the estimate of production. Beet-sugar factories, likewise, are comparatively few in number, handle practically all the sugar beets produced in the country, and keep accurate records of sugar-beet acreage and production. The bureau obtains reports from practically every beet-sugar factory in the United States. Its estimates of acreage and production are almost equivalent to an actual census, and are accepted by the trade as highly accurate. Crop movement. — Reports of the various transportation companies to State and national authorities of the move- ment of grain and other farm products are of value as indexes only, not of total actual crop production but of 21G23"— IS 2 Bl-Q Forts. I 7 TRUCK CROPS. There Is no annual check on the accuracy of the bureau's estimate of production of truck crops. The best annual checks on the size of the various truck crops are prices and data supplied by the transportation, storage, and canning companies. The data collected by the Bureau of Markets will become of increasing value as its work is developed and its methods are perfected. LIVE STOCK. The only checks upon the accuracy of the bureau's annual estimates of numbers of different cksses of live stock are the decennial census, tax assessors' returns in some States, commercial movement, and receipts of meat animals at stockyards, and average prices. SCOPE OF INFORMATION CONTAINED [Key: (A) Acreage; {%&) acreage in per cent of last year; (b) number of breeding exposure; (F) final estimates (acreage, production, value); ({) per cent of crops (1) cut for silos; (m) per cent of crop of merchantable quality; (n) number; (P) pro after abandonment; (s) supplies on farms; (v) values — prices of products marked per acre — or colony.) 1 Crop. ! Jan. 1 Mar. Apr. May. June. CereaU: Barley v+ sf Ac Buckwheat v-|- Com v-f sfm Oals v+ sf Rice Ac Rye ... V-!- " re c Wheat(all) sf Wheat (spring) Ac e %ac Wheat (winter) c re Forage (grasses): Alfal.'a. hay v-f Alfalfa seed v+ 1 %ac Clover seed v + I ' c s c c Hav (all) v + 1 Hay (tame) 1 Hay(wUd) I v + Kafirs.elc ! v + Meadows i ... i ■■ .J c Millet Pastures ^ c 1 c c :: Fruits: Apples ■ 1 e c c ! c Cranberries Grapefruit, Florida } v-j- Grapes ' C c c c Lemons. California v+ Limes. Florida v+ Olives. California - C c c c c c c c c c c c cv c Oranges Peaches Pears ... •••v + c c c c c c c c c Pineapples, Florida c c Vegetables: Beans (dry) v + Beans (lima). California . c c v-U c c c c %p VcP Field beans c c Potatoes gv+ Sweet potatoes v + c c e c e c Miscellaneous: ..'.... Broom com v+ c Flaxseed c Honey v + v+ v+ ■ Hods 1 Plowing 1 c %ac Tobacco ' Walnuts (EnplishV Cal i c Wool v+ Live stock: Horses 1 nv + }. Mules nv nv + All cattle de^ dec de deb Sheep nv + v + nv+ Lamb« nc Note.— Reports of prices are also obtained monllily for butter, eggs, chickens, milk, ary. February. October. November, and December: for black walnuts, hickory nuU. com in January,February,November, and December; for maple sugar and sirup in March, IS IN 1 HE SEVERAL CROP REPORIS. »owi compared with last year: (c) condition: (d) Iom« from difcajc; (e) Io«»m from thipped oul of county where grown; (h) ni-mbcr »lock hoq« compared with year ago, duction; (%p) per cent of full crop produced; (q) quality; (r) acreacie remaining (v + ) in January are a»ked each month; (w) weight per buihel. or fleecr; (Y) yield July. Aug. S.,L Oct. 1 Nov. Dec. Crop. c Ac " c Ac ic Ac c *c c APq c c c : Pq c c Pq c w Pq .Pql w F F F F qF a1:F F F AcF Cereal.: Bailcv. Buckwhea Com. Oats. Rice. Rye. Wheat (all). c c Pr. Pq w w Wheat (spring). Wheat (winter). Y%p Forage (grasses): Alialia. hav. y^cp Alfalfa, seed. c ; Y . .pq Clover, hav. c p £*> Pq c c c ^;? c c c Ac A A c c Field peas. Hay (all). F F F Hay (wild). c Y%P Kafirletc. c c c %»c c Y«r^ rcP c MQiet. Pastures. , Timothv. ha>. c ; c c %P c c c c %pq Ff Fruits: Apples. Apricots. California. Black and rasp berries. %p c c cv c c c c %pqv cv v c %p c c r Cant'^loupes. c cv c c c c cv V Y7cpq c c c c . %pqv' ▼ F Yr^pq YS^pq Fv c 1 c c cv c c c c c c c c cv cv c cv cv %pv c c c c c c c c c c Grapefruit. Florida. Grapes. Lemons. California. Limes, Florida. Olives. California. Oranges. Peaches. Pears, Pineapples. Florida. Prunes California. 1 F Vegetables: Beans (drv). V^P Cabbages, Cauliflower California. ' i. . Celery California. t I Ac c Ac c cv cv c c c c Ac c Ac c c c Y C c c c cv c c c c c c c ' .' PV VV.,P c Y%p Field beans. Onions. Pq F F Potatoes. Sweet potatoes. ^cP ■pq • ■*F " rP F Miscellaneous: Almonds, California. Broom corn. Cotton. Fla.x8eed. Hemp. Honey. Hops. Pea.nuts. Planlinsj. Plow ing. c c c c c ' ^c- ivVip,-....^. %ac c c c Y c c Ac c w c c c c c c c c c c cv c c ^,pv "¥' V Sugar beets. Sugar cane. Tobacco. Wahua (English). Cal. Wool. LWs stock: /Horses. \Mui«. Other cattle. ' All cattle. 1 Sheep. 1 ■ he ■ * S\vine Honey bees, colonies. 1 1 vealcalves. timothy seed, cotton seed, cottonseed meal, and bran; for soy beans in Janj- pecans. and turkeys in January. October, November, and December; for turnips and pop- April. May, and June; aaid ior chestnuts in October. November, and December. O 19 UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA ■I 3 1262 09216 9175