■ T S 0£PT U.S. DEPOSITORY // u UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OP AGRICULTURE Bureau of Agricultural Economics Economic Library List No. 11 Washington', D.C. , July 1940 TEE DAIRY INDUSTRY IN THE UNITED STATES Selected References on the Economic Aspects of the Industry- Compiled "by Louise 0. Bercaw Library, Bareau of Agricultural. Economics This list contains references to publications issued during the period January 1939 through June 1940, including a few is- sued in 1937 and 1938, which were listed in Agricultural Econo- mic^ Literature January 1939 through June 1940. It also con- tains a number of references to articles in farm papers. The list contains few references to tho production and market news reports issued by tho Agricultural Marketing Service. For a list of such reports see Dairy Market News and Production Re- ports Issued by Agricultural Marketing Service (item 48), GENERAL 1. Albany milk conference, Albany, N.Y. , 1939. A record of proceedings... January 17, 1939. .61pp. c Albany? N.Y., 1939} 281.3449 All 2. Allen, R.H. , Hole.Erling, and Mighell, R.L. Supply responses in milk production in the Cabot-Marshfield area, Vermont. U.S. Dept. Agr. Tech. Bui. 709, 60pp. Washington, D.C, 1940. 1 Ag84Te 3. American institute of cooperation, 14th, Pullman, Wash., and Moscow, Idaho, 1938. American cooperation, 1938; a collection of papers comprising the fourteenth summer session of the American institute of cooperation at State college of Washington and University of Idaho, July 11 to 15, 1933. 734pp. Washington, D.C. C 1938 D 260.29 Am3A 14th, 1938 Partial contents: How. trade agreements affect the welfare of dairy farmers, by Charles W. Koiman, pp. 143-155; The future out- lets and outlook for fluid milk under public control, by A.E. Engbretson, pp. 273-281; Advantages and disadvantages of public milk control, by B.3. Derrick, pp. 282-285; Powers and limita- tions of public milk control authorities, by Harry Polikoff, pp. 286-294; Equalizing surplus burdens in a fluid milkshed, by L.^.. Markham, pp. 295-297; Equalizing surplus burdens through - 2 - public control, "by W.H. Henry, pp. 298-303; Contrasting marketing problems of far-western and middle western co-op creameries, by T.G. Stitts, pp. 307-318; Price returns policies of manufacturing co-operatives, by W.G. Grimm, pp. 319-324; The initial establish- ment of price policies, by C.W. Laughlin, pp. 325-326; Manufac- tured milk marketing problems, by G.H. Benkendorf , pp. 327-334; The problem of quality in manufactured milk, by M.M. Boney, pp. 335-339; The federal government's purchase program for dairy products, by E.W. Gaumnitz, Oscar Swank, P. A. Cornelius, G.A. Brown, and E.S. Trask, pp. 340-370. 4. American institute of cooperation, 15th, Chicago, 1939. American co- operation, 1939. A collection of papers comprising the fifteenth summer session of the American institute of cooperation at the University of Chicago, August 7 to 11, 1939. 695pp. Washington, D.C. C 1939 D 280.29 Am3A 15th, 1939. Partial contents: The role of a public relations policy in the management and operation of cooperative dairy marketing association, by L.W.W. Morrow, pp. 239-247; Report of conferences on publicity and public relations policies of cooperatives, by Edwy B. Reid and Val C. Sherman, pp. 254-255; Adjusting sales policies to market changes, by R.W. Bartlett, pp. 259-270; The base rating plan in relation to price maintenance, by B.B. Derrick, pp. 271-278; Plant production changes in the Middle West: I. by R.K. Froker, pp. 279-290; II, by J.B. Countiss, pp. 291-299; Sales methods of local cooperative creameries, by Paul E. Quintus, pp. 300-309; Borderline milk and cream market problems: I, by Matthew M. Wallrich, pp. 310-316; II, by John Knox, pp. 317-324; Fundamentals of butter price stabilization, by Don S. Anderson, pp. 325-334; Responsibilities and services of a cooperative under public milk marketing control: I, by O.M. Reed, pp. 335-341; II, by E.W. Tiedeman, pp. 342-350;* The development of public control as a permanent policy, by O.H. Hoffman, jr., pp. 351-362. 5. Anthony, E.L. Dairying of tomorrow. Hoard's Dairyman 85(2): 35, 61. Jan. 25, 1940. 44.8 H65 From an address before the American Society of Animal Produc- tion. 6. Brown, Edward Fisher, compiler. Milk papers. 4 v., printed and pro- cessed. : New York City, Milk research council, inc., 1939 D 281.344 B81 Arranged chronologically: v. 1, 1910-1935 (documents 1-24); v.2, 1936-1937 (documents 25-38B) ; v. 3, 1938 (documents 39-54); v.4, Appendix to volumes 1, 2, and 3. - 3 - 7. Carncross, J.W. , and Waller, A.G. Production and price trends in the dairy industry and cost of producing milk in New Jersey. N.J. Agr. Col. Dept. Agr. Econ. Rutgers Univ. A.E. 39, 11pp., processed. New Brunswick, 1940. 8. Dodge, H.E. Organization for the dairy industry. Kans. State Bd. Agr. Ppt. 59(236): 47-51. Topeka, 1940. 9. Eckles, Combs, and Macy. History and growth of dairying. Hoard's Dairyman 83(24): 624. Dec. 25, 1938. 44.8 H65 "This is the continuation of an article that appeared in March 10 issue. It is reproduced from the new edition of 'Milk and Milk Products,' "by special permission of the McGraw-Hill Book Company, publisher and holder of the copyright." - Editor's note. 10. Efferson, J.N. , and Merrick, Prank. Milk production in southeastern Louisiana. La. State Univ. Dept. Agr. Econ. La. Rural Econ. 2(2): 10-12. University, Apr. 1940. 11. Evans, R.M. The AAA farm program and the northeast dairyman; excerpts from an address... at the annual convention of the Vermont dairy- men's association, Burlington, Vermont, Jan. 18, 1940. 8pp., processed. Washington, D.C. , U.S. Dept. of agriculture, Agricul- tural adjustment administration, 1940. 1.42 Ad4Ev 12. Evans, R.M. Dairying and the AAA in 1939; address... at Madison, Wis- consin, January 30, 1939. 17pp., processed. Washington, D.C, U.S. Dept. of agriculture, Agricultural adjustment administration, 1939. 1.42 Ad4Sv 13. Florida. Dept. of agriculture. Twenty-fifth biennial report. . .from July 1, 1936, to June 30, 1938. 220pp. Tallahassee, 1939. Dairy industry, pp. 63-111. 14. Praser, Wilber J. Is dairying a game of chance? Hoard's Dairyman 85(6): 180, 204. Mar. 25, 1940. 44.8 H65 15. Hart, E.B. Milk and science. Hoard's Dairyman 85(3): 68. Feb. 10, 1940. 44.8 H65 "This article is from an address before the American Society of Animal Production." 16. Houghthy, E.E. A challenge to dairymen. Nation's Agr. 15(2): 1, 8. Feb. 1940. 280.82 B89 "This article is adapted from an address... at the 1939 con- vention of the Wisconsin Farm Bureau Federation." - 4 - 17. Idaho. Dept. of agriculture. Tenth "biennial report. . .1937-1938. 68pp. Boise C 1939 D Bureau of Dairying, pp. 35-41. 18. Johnson, Sherman E. , Mighell , Ronald L. , and Hady, Frank T. Probable effeets of the Agricultural conservation program on livestock production in the midwest dairy region. 4 pts., processed. Washington, D.C., U.S. Dept. of agriculture, Bureau of agricul- tural economics, Jan. 1940. 1.941 L6P94 Fart I is A Summary of the Studies of Selected Areas; part II deals with northeastern Iowa; part III, with southeastern and east central Minnesota; and part IV with four Wisconsin areas. 19. Kirkpatrick,. M. Glen. A program for milk. Farm Jour, and Farmer's Wife 63(5): 22, 24. May 1939. 6 F2212 20. Koller, E. Fred. Recent trends in the Minnesota dairy. iridus try. Minn. Univ. Dept. Agr. Divs. Agr. Econ. and Agr. Ext, -Farm Busi- ness Notes, no. 196, pp. 1-2. University Farm, St. Paul, Apr. 1939. . - 21. Koller, E. Fred, and Jesness, O.B. Trends in the Minnesota dairy industry. Minn. Agr. Expt . Sta. Bui. 346, 40pp. University Farm, St. .Paul, 1940. 22. Krauss, W.E. The responsibility of the milk producer to the consumer. Ohio. Agr.'.'Expt. Sta. Bimonthly Bui. 25(203).: 31-35. Wooster, Mr.r.-Apr. 1940. 23. c Lauterbach, Arthur Ho Arthur H. Lauterbach, manager, Chicago Pure milk assn., outlines a future for milk. Farm Jour, and Farmer's Wife 64(1): 15. Jan. 1940. 6 F2212 24. Lauterbach, Arthur H. Situation in Chicago milk shed. Hoard's Dairy- man -84(14).: 414. July 25, 1939. 44.8H65- 25. Mclnnerney, Thomas H. Statement by. . .president, National dairy prod- ucts corporation, before the Temporary national economic committee, May 3, 1939. 13pp. [New York, National dairy products corpora- . tion, 1939;] 281.344 M18 26. Maine. Agricultural experiment station. Report... for year ending June 30, ,1938. ; Maine. Agr. Expt. Sta. Bui. 391, pp.232-332. Orono, 1938. Economic studies of the dairy and potato industries and of land use are noted. - 5 - 27. Malott, Deane Waldo, and Martin, Boyce F. The agricultural industries. Ed. 1, 483pp. New York and London, McGraw-Hill "book: co., inc., 1939.. 281.12 M29 Bibliography, pp. 463-476. Ch. 2, The Dairy Industry,' pp . 16-66. 28. Massachusetts. Special commission of the laws relating to milk and milk products. Report of the Special commission established to investigate and study the laws relating to production, transpor- tation, sale and distribution of milk and milk products, and cer- tain related matters, under chapter 68, Resolves of 1937. January 20, 1938. 81pp. Boston, Wright and Potter print, co., 1938. ( c General court, 1937;, Senate c Doc. D no. 410) 281.344 M38 29. National cooperative milk producers' federation. Educational series, nos. 9-15. 7 nos. Washington, D.C., 1937-1939. 281.3449 N21 Contents: No. 9. The dairy farmer and the Philippines c 1937?;j; no. 10. Dairy problems of 1937. 1937; no. 11. Dairy problems of 1938. Nov. 14, 1938; no. 12. How trade agreements affect the wel- fare of dairy farmers, by C.W. Holman. 1938; no. 13. A national program for dairy farmers. 1939; no. 14. Trade agreement with Argentina, by C.W. Holman. 1939; no. 15. Dairy problems of 1939. Nov. 15, 1939. 30. New England institute of cooperation. Proceedings of the tenth- eleventh annual meeting, 1937-1938. 2 nos., processed, en. p., 1937-38 : 280.29 N44 Partial contents: 10th: Will the milk license solve New England's milk problem? by S.W. Tator, pp. 40-42; A cooperative marketing set-up for New England milk, by John McGrath, pp. 43-44, discussion, by Quentin Reynolds, J.E. Carrigan, and D.W. Reed, pp. 45-50. 11th: Promoting fluid milk consumption, by D.M. Frisbie, pp. 68-71; Status of federal milk orders and their relation to dairy cooperatives, by E.W. Gauranitz, pp. 98-103; Current problems of dairy cooperatives, by E.H. Jones, pp. 104-107; Milk inspection for sanitation or economic protection? by K.E. Geyer, pp. 130-133. 31. New Hampshire. Dept. of agriculture. Repcbrt. . .for the two years ending June 30, 1938. 232pp. Concord, 1938. Dairy industry, pp. 205-210. 32. Ne\7 York (State) Attorney-general's office. A report to Hon. Herbert E. Lehman, governor, and and the honorable, the Legislature of the state of New York, by John J. Bennett, jr., attorney general, on the milk industry of the state of New York with particular reference to the New York metropolitan area. 129pp. c New York, Case press, inc.} 1938. 280.344 N483 - 6 - 33. Noyes, Holton V. Milk situation in New York. Hoard's Dairyman 84 (12): 373. June 25, 1939. 44.8 H65 . 34. Noyes, Holton V. Now York milk problems. Hoard's Dairyman 84(13): 399. July 10, .1939. 44.8 H65 Excerpts from an address given "before the annual meeting of the Dairymen's League. 35. Noyes, Holton V. New York milk situation. Hoard's Dairyman 84(18): 506, 515. Sept. 25, 1939. 44.8 H65 36.. Perregaux, 2. A.' x Dairy situation] .Conn. (Storrs) Stato Col. Ext. Serv. Econ. Digest for Conn. Agr. no. 75, pp . 621-624. Storrs, Mar. 1939. 37. Reed, O.E. What dairying can contribute to the social and economic life of the South; remarks... at the 40th annual, convention of the Association of southern agricultural workers., New Orleans, La., February 1, 1939. 10pp., processed. Washington, D.C., U.S. Dept. of agriculture, 3ureau of dairy industry, 1939. 1.9 D14A • •• 38. Rinear, E.H. Dairy problems. N.J. State Col. Agr. Ext. Serv. and Agr. Expt . Sta. Econ. Rev. no. 129-132, pp. 3-4., processed. • New Brunswick, Dec. 1938-Mar. 1939. 39. Schoenfield, Clarence. 100 years of Wisconsin dairying. Prairie Parmer 112(4): 1, 16, 19. Peb. 24, 1940. 6 P833B 40. Spencer, Leland. The causes of milk strikes. Araer. Agr. 136(19): 468. Sept. 16, 1939. 6 Ara3 : . 41.- Spencer, Leland. Dry weather and the milk situation. Amer. Agr. 136(18): 444. Sept. 2, 1939. 6 Am3 42. Spencer, Leland. Milk production control. N.Y. (Cornell) Agr. Col. Dept. Agr. Econ. and Farm Mangt. A.E. 304, 18pp., processed. Ithaca, 1940. 43. Spencer, Leland.. Milk production control from the national view- point. Amer. Agr. 137(5): 137. .Mar. 2, 1940. 6 Am3 44. Spencer, Leland. Ways of increasing farmers' returns for milk. Amer. Agr. 136(12): 301. June 10, 1939. 6 Am3 Lists .five different ways in which milk returns might be increased. - 7 - 45. Stine, O.C. The dairy outlook for 1939... Statement made at the annual meeting of the Maryl and- Virginia milk producers' association, Washington, D.C, February 6, 1939. 12pp., processed. Washington, D. C. , U.S. Dept. of agriculture, Bureau of agricultural economics, 1939. 1.9 Ec752Do 46. Tracy, P.Hi, and Tuckey, S.L. Accuracy of methods of sampling milk delivered at milk plants. 111. Agr. Expt. Sta. Bui. 459, pp. 47- 84. Urbana, 1939. 47. U.S. Dept. of agriculture. Report of the Secretary of agriculture, 1939. 169pp. Washington, D.C, 1939. 1 Ag84 Dairy adjustment and the national farm program, pp. 109-111. Reports of progress are also issued by the different bureaus of the Department. See particularly annual reports of the Agri- cultural Adjustment Administration, the Bureau of Agricultural Economics, the Agricultural Marketing Service, the Commodity Exchange Administration, and the Bureau of Dairy Industry. 48. U.S. Dept. of agriculture. Agricultural marketing service. Dairy market- news and production reports issued by Agricultural mar- keting service. 7pp., processed. Washington, D.C, 1939. 1.942 D3R29 49. U.S. Dept. of agriculture. Bureau of agricultural economics. Agri- cultural outlook charts 1940. Dairy products. 24pp., processed. Washington, D.C. Oct. 1939. 1.9 Ec70dc 49a. U.S. Dept. of agriculture. -.Bureau of agricuxtural economics. The dairy situation, Sept. 1931-date. Processed. Washington, D.C, 1931-date. 1.9 Ed7Ds "Issued about the 16th of each month." 50. U.S. Dept. of agriculture. Bureau of dairy industry. Publications relating to the dairy industry. 10pp., processed. Washington, D.C, revised to Hot. 1939. 1.9 An55Pa 51. Vial, E.E. The dairy outlook for 1940. U.S. Dept. Agr. Bur. Agr. Econ. Agr. Situation 23(11): 22-24. Nov. 1939. 1 Ec7Ag 52. Vial, E.E. Shifts in the dairy industry. U.S. Dept. Agr. Bur. Agr. Econ. Agr. Situation 22(12): 16-18. Dec. 1938. 1 Ec7Ag 53. Wilson, John L. Problems in adopting the milk cow. U.S. Dept. Agr. Agr. Mktg. Serv. Mktg. Activities 2(5): 11-21, processed. May 1940. 1.942 A8M34 54. Wisconsin crop and livestock reporting service. Wisconsin dairying. Wis. Dept. Agr. Bui. 200, 100pp., Madison, 1939. "This bulletin brings together the more rocent material on the - 8 - Wisconsin dairying, industry, together with the., general data for the United States. Bulletin Ho. 120, 'Wisconsin Dairying' was issued in 1931, and this "bulletin may well he used in conjunction with the earlier ones in case long- time' series of data are wanted." - From foreword "by Walter H. Ehling, entitled 100 Years of Agricultural Statistics. A selected "bihliography on the Dairy Industry in America, by F. Marcus Schmidt, is contained on pp. 91-97. COOPERATION 55. Oaumnitz, E.W. Effect of federal milk control on cooperatives. Address. . .before the annual convention of the National coopera- tive milk producers' federation, Cincinnati, Ohio, November 14, 1938. 8pp. ,. processed. Washington, D.C., U.S. Dept. of agricul- ture, Agricultural adjustment administration, 1938. 1,94 D14Ad 56. G-eyer, Ken. Surplus - stay away from our doorl U.S. Farm Credit Admin. News for Farmer Coops. 6(8): 3-4, 19-20. Nov. 1939. 166.2 N47 On the Connecticut Milk Producers ' Association. 57. Heaps, Isaac Wallace. Twenty years of cooperative milk marketing in Baltimore. 216pp. c Baltimore, 1938 3 280.244 H3 5 58. Lauterhach, Arthur H. Pure milk "goes to town" via radio. U.S. Farm ■ Credit Admin. News for Farmer Coops. 6(9): 9, 22. Dec 1939. 166.2 N47 ' ' Radio shows of the Pure Milk Association of Chicago. 59. National cooperative milk producers' federation. History series. no. 1-14. 14nos., processed. Washington, 1932-38. 280.2449 N21 N s. 1-, 3, 8-9 typewritten. 60. Roberts, J.B., and Price, H.B. Organization and management of the Falls Cities. Cooperative milk producers' association. Ky. Agr. Expt. Sta. Bui. 390, pp. 37-87. Lexington, 1939. 61. Tereshtenko, Valery J. Cooperative dairying, by V.J. Tereshtenko and Research staff of the cooperative project. U.S. Works Projects Admin. New York City. Studies of the Coop. Project. Ser. C. , pt.l, 212pp., processed. c New York? 1940 D 280.2 Un382 62. Trologan, Harry C. , and Hyre, French M. Cooperative marketing of dairy products. U.S. Farm Credit Admin. Coop. Res. and Serv. Div. Cir. no. C-116, 47pp. Washington, D.C. , 1939. 166.2 C4926 - 9 - 63. Trelogan, Harry C. Using your fluid milk co-op. U.S. Farm Credit Admin. Cir. E. , no. 14, 13pp. Washington, D.C. , 1939. 166.2 C4926 64. Welden, William. C., and Stitts, T.G. Cooperative milk marketing in Louisville. and other nearby cities. U.S. Farm Credit Admin. Coop. Res. and Serv. Div. Bui. 32, 88pp. Washington, D.C, 1939. 166.2 B87 65. Welden, William C Organizing fluid-milk marketing cooperatives in the United States. Pan Amer. Union. Div. Agr. Coop. Ser. on Coop. no. 13, 31pp., processed. Washington, D.C, July 1939. 150.9 C78 66. Wpldcn, William C This is the plant that skim "built. U.S. Farm Credit Admin. News for Farmer Coops. 6(12): 6, 24. Mar. 1940. 166.2 N47 On the program of the Chattanooga Area Milk Producers Association. DAIRY HERDS 67. Curtiss, W.M. Age of cows in dairy herds. N.Y. (Cornell) j^ r% Col, Dept. Agr. Econ. and Farm Mangt. Farm Econ. no. 118, pp. 2930-2931. Ithaca, Apr. 1940. 68. Curtiss, W.M. , and Matzen, E.H. Marketing cull dairy cows in New York state. N.Y. (Cornell) Agr. Col. Dept. Agr. Econ. and Farm Mangt. A.S. 310, 31pp., processed. Ithaca, 1940. 69. Curtiss, W.M. Number and breed of cows on New York dairy farms, 1939. N.Y. (Cornell) Agr.' Col. Dept. Agr. Econ. and Farm Mangt. A.E. 283, 9pp., processed. Ithaca, 1939. 70. Curtiss, W.M. Origin and destination of New York dairy herd replace- ments. N.Y. (Cornell) Agr.' Col. Dept. Agr. Econ. and Farm Mangt. Farm Econ. no. 116, pp. 2871-2872. Ithaca, Jan. 1940. 71. Matzen, E.H. , and Curtiss, W.M. Marketing replacements for New York dairy herds. N.Y. (Cornell) Agr. Col. Dept. Agr. Econ. and Farm Mangt. A.E. 286, 66pp., processed. Ithaca, 1939. 72. Winkjer, Joel C Cooperative dairy bull associations. U.S. Dept. Agr, Farmers' Bui. 1830, 16pp. Washington, D.C, Oct. 1939. 1 Ag84F - 10 - 73. Woodin, U.J), The distribution of dairy cattle in Chautauqua County, New York, 1937. N.Y. (Cornell) State Col. Agr. Dept. Agr. Econ. and Farm Mangt. Farm Econ. no. 113, pp. 2794-2795. Ithaca, May 1939. DAIRY PRODUCTS AND CREAMERIES 74. Bell, E.W. Boston cream market hurt more by domestic dumping than "by tariff changes. Mass. State Col. Ext. Serv. Farm Econ. Facts 12(1): 1-2.. Amherst, Jan. 1939. 75. Blanford, Charles. Sales of cream "by retail stores in the New York market, June, 1938. N.Y. (Cornell) Agr. Col. Dept. Agr. Econ. and Farm Mangt. A.E. 244, 14pp., processed. Ithaca, 1939. 76. Blanford, Charles. Sales of evaporated milk by retail stores in the New York market. N.Y. (Cornell) Agr. Col. Dept. Agr. Econ. and Farm Mangt. A.E. 245, 10pp., processed. Ithaca, 1939. 77. Buechel, Frederick Anthony, and Johnson, Elmer H. Manufacture of dairy products in Texas... c Preliminary report] 95pp., pro- cessed. Austin, Tex., Bureau of business research, University of Texas, 1938. 281.344 386M In 2 parts: Pt. I. Regional aspects of the Texas dairy indus- try; Pt. II. Analysis of statistics of Texas dairy manufactured products. 78. Commodity research bureau, inc. Commodity year book 1939-1940. New York, 1939-1940. 286.8 C7392 Includes statistics of dairy products. 79. Cox, R.W. , and Waite, W.C. . Consumption of butter by Minneapolis fami- lies. Minn. Univ. Dept. Agr. Divs. Agr. Econ. and Agr. Ext. Farm Business Notes no. 193, p. 3. University Farm, St. Paul, Jan. 1939. 80. Dankers, W.H. , and Koller, E.F. A survey of cooperative creameries in Watonwan county, . 1937. Minn. Univ. Agr. Ext. Pam. 54, 26pp, , processed. University Farm, St. Paul, 1938. 81. Durand, Loyal, jr. Cheese region of southeastern Wisconsin. Econ. Geog. 15(3): 283-292. July 1939. 278.8 Ec7 82. Foelsch, Gertrude Gr. Estimates of gross and net weights of butter in various types of packages at New York, Chicago, Boston and Phila- delphia. 13pp., processed. Washington, D.C. , U.S. Dept. of agri- culture, 3ureau of agricultural economics, May 1939. 1.9 Ec724Est -li- es. Froker, U.K. , and Colebank, A.W. Large-scale organization in the dairy- industry. U.S. Dept. Agr. Cir. 527, 68pp. Washington, D.C. ,1939. 1 Ag84C 84. Indiana. Agricultural experiment station. Creamery license division. Twenty-fourth annual report... for the year ending March 31, 1938. Ind. Agr. Expt . Sta. Cir. 238, 16pp. Lafayette, 1938. Includes dairy statistics and a list of licensed manufacturing plants in Indiana. The 25th annual report was issued as Cir. 251. 85. Irwin, E.S. Impressions of trading in "butter and egg futures. 28pp., processed. Washington, D.C, U.S. Dept. of agriculture, Commodity exchange administration, Feb. 1940. (CEA-21) 1.9 C73C 86. Irwin, H.S. Survey of "butter futures, as . of August 31, 1939. 36pp., processed. Washington, D.C, U.S. Dept. of agriculture, Commodity exchange administration, Mar. 1940. (CEA-22) 1.9 C73C 87. Jensen, J.M. A study of cream quality from creameries located in southern Michigan. Mich. Agr. Expt. Sta. Quart.- Bui. 22(3): 203- 208. East Lansing, Feb. 1940. 88. Koller, E. Fred. The Minnesota creamery industry, 1934-1937. Minn. Univ. Dept. Agr. Divs. Agr. Econ. and Agr. Ext. Farm Business Notes, no . 191, pp. 1-3. University Farm, St. Paul, Nov. 1938. 89. Koller, E-. I red. Some aspects of creamery operations in Minnesota in 1958. Minn. Univ. Dept. Agr. Divs. Agr. Econ. and Agr. Ext. Farm Business Notes, no. 202, p. 3. University Farm, St. Paul, Oct. 1939. 90. Mathis, George L. New outlook for National dairy ^products corporation^ Products and markets broadening for leader of the sprawling milk industry. Mag. Wall St. 66(1): 44-45, 62. Apr. 20, 1940. 286.8 M27 91. National farm chemurgic council, inc. Research committee. Chemurgic potentialities, for the consideration of the Research committee of the National farm chemurgic council, Columbus, Ohio, unpaged, processed. c Columbus? Ohio, 1939 D 281.12 N217 Discusses very briefly, the potential market, etc., of white pota- to and sweet potato starch, oils and fats, paint and varnish oils, flax,, hemp, ramie, yucca, paper from straw, fruit and fruit by-products, synthetic wools and new spinnable fibres, milk by- products, etc. - 12 - 92. Nemaha co-operative creamery association.' 1930-1940 year book cele- brating the tenth anniversary of the Nemaha co-operative creamery association, Sabetha, Kansas. 14pp. c Sabetha, Kansas, 1940] . 280.2449 N34 1940 93. Newman, William A. The effectiveness of the butter tariff. Minn. Univ. Dept. Agr. Diva. Agr. Econ. and Agr. Ext. Farm Business Notes, no. 191, p. 3. University Farm, St. Paul, Nqv. 1938. 94. Nicholls, William H. Concentration in cheese marketing. Iowa. State Col. Agr. and Mech. Arts. Ext. Serv. Iowa Farm Econ. 5(2): 5-6. Ames, Apr. 1939 . 95. Nicholls, William H. Post-war concentration in the cheese industry. Jour. Polit. Econ. 47(6): 823-845. Dec. 1939. 96. Nicholls, William H. Post-war developments in the marketing of butter. Iowa. Agr.' Expt. Sta. Res. Bui. 250, pp. 321-384. Ames, 1939. 97. Nicholls, William H. Post-war developments in the marketing' of cheese. Iowa. Agr. Expt. Sta. Res. Bui. 261, 148pp. Ames, 1939. 98. Nicholls, William H. Short-circuiting the butter middleman. Iowa. State Col. Agr'. and Mech. Arts. Ext. Serv. Iowa Farm Econ. 5(1): 13-14.. Ames, Jan. 1939. 99. Orton, Vrest. Country industry. Free Amer. 3(8): 8-10. Aug. 1939. The story of Crowley 1 ? chcece factury in Vermont. "Crowley's success is the story of a small business, run by one family for six generations, and one that has stoutly resisted the siren call for expansion." 100. Quin tus, Paul E. , and Robotka, Frank. Butt erf at procurement by creameries in 3utler county, Iowa. Iowa. Agr. Expt. Sta. Res. Bui. 265, pp. 251-302. Ames, 1939. 101. Quintus, Paul E. "Challenge" - means just that. U.S. Farm Credit Admin. News for Farmer Coops. 6(7): 5-6. Oct. 1939. 166.2 N47 The story of the Challenge Cream and Butter Association, Los Angeles, Calif. 102. Quintus, Paul E. Cutting butterfat marketing costs. Iowa. State Col. Agr. and Mech. Arts. Agr. Ext. Serv. and Agr. Expt. Sta. Iowa Farm Econ.' 5(3): 3-7. Ames, July 1939. 103. Quintus, Paul E. Selecting outlets for butter. U.S. Farm Credit Admin. News for Farmer Coops. 6(11): 25-27. Feb. 1940. 166.2 N47 - 13 - 104. Quintus, Paul E. Using your co-op creamery. U.S. Farm Credit: Admin. Cir. E, no. 6, 13pp.. Washington, D.C., 1939. 166.2 C4926 ■■ 105. Qui.itus, Paul E. Wholosalo "butter prices and premiums. Jour.- Farm Econ. 21(3, pt.l): 595-605. Aug. 1939. 280.8' J822 106. Reed, O.E. New developments in the uses of manufactured dairy- prod- ucts; remarks... at the 23d annual convention of the National cooperative milk producers' federation, Chicago, 111., November 16, 1939. 12pp., processed. Washington, D.C.'U.S. Dept. of agriculture, Bureau of dairy industry, 1939. ' 1.973 A2R25 107. Reid, Edwy B. A dairy co-op loads the way. U.S. Farm Credit Admin. News for Farmer Coops. 6(3): 12-14. June 1939. 166.2 N47; On the Dairymen's Cooperative Creamery of Boise Valley. ..... 108. Robotka, Frank, and Shefrin, Frank. 'Cooperative creameries in the United States. Pan Amor. Union. Div. Agr. Coop. Series on Coops, no. 14, 34pp., processed. Washington, D.C, Apr. 1940. 150.9 C78 109. Robotka, Frank, and Quintus.Paul E. Trucks change cream-marketing picture. U.S. Farm Credit Admin. News for Farmer Coops. 7(2): 21-23. May 1940. 166.2 N47 110. Speer, Ray P. The hunt for more cream. County Gent. 109(7): 9, 69. July 1939. 6 C833 Natural boundaries which formerly separated creamery from creamery have been broken down by the advent of the paved road and the motortruck. Competition between creameries has become so great and so many questionable practices have sprung up that it is thought that consolidation or merger of the cooperative's ' in a district is the solution to the problem. 111. Sponcer, Leland. Consumption and prices of canned milk as related to the demand for fresh milk. N.Y. (Cornell) Agr. Col. D^t. Agr. Econ. and Farm Mangt, A.S. 303, 25pp. , 'processed. Ithaca, May 1940. In cooperation with the Bureau of 'Agricultural Economics, U.S. Dept. of Agriculture. List of reports on surveys pertaining to the consumption of dairy products, p. 25. 112. Spencer, Leland. Evaporated milk. Amer. Agr. 136(10-11): 249, 273. May 13, May, 27, 1939. 6 Am3 Discusses the increase in the consumption of evaporated milk while the consumption of fresh milk has remained'' practically the same' for the last 20 years. ' ' ' '» - 14 - 113. Spencer, Loland. How the large dairy companies fared in 1938. Amer. Agr. 136(8): 197. Apr. 15, 1939. 6 Am3 Discusses the reports of the large dairy corporations, espe- cially those of the Borden Company and the National Dairy Products Corporation. 114. Sprague, Gordon W. , Foelsch, Gertrude G. , and Small, Edward. A survey of quality of selected "brands of "butter sold in one-pound cartons at retail in New York and Chicago. 20pp., processed. Washington, B.C.,- U.S. Dept. of agriculture, Bureau of agricultural economics, Feb. 1939. 1.9 Ec724Sq 115. Stitts, T.G. Contrasting problems of "butter co-ops. U.S. Farm Credit Admin. News for Farmer Coops. 6(4): 7, 19-20. July 1939. 166.2 N47 116. The story of American efficiency. The record of the evaporated milk industry; sales are doubled, prices halved since 1920. U.S. News 7(2): 9. Jan. 9, 1939. 280.8 Un33A One of a series of articles on efficiency of American industry. 117. Tomlinson, Frederick R. World production and international trade in "butter and cheese. 146pp., processed. Washington, D.C, U.S. Dept. of agriculture, Bureau of agricultural economics, May 1959. 1.9 Ec752Wp 118. U.S. Dept. of agriculture. Agricultural marketing service. Handbook of official United States standards for quality of creamery butter, effective April 1, 1939. 29pr>. , Washington, D.C, Feb. 1940. 1 M341H 119. U.S. Dept. of agriculture. Agricultural marketing service. Production of manufactured dairy products, 1938, and miscellaneous dairy statistics, 1939. 82pp., processed. Washington, D.C, Mar. 1940. 1 .9 Ec724D 120. U.S. Dept. of agriculture. Bureau of agricultural economics. Dairy products manufactured in factories 1937, United States and state data by months. 41pp., processed. Washington, D.C,- Feb. 1939. 1.9 Ec724Dpm 1937 121. U.S. Dept. of agriculture. Bureau of agricultural economics. Dairy products: the world war and the 1939 European war. 7pp., processed, Washington, D.C, Oct. 1939. 1.941 D2D14 122. U.S. Dept. of agriculture. Bureau of agricultural economics. Milk equivalent of production of manufactured dairy products by states, 1937. 2pp.., processed. Washington, D.C, Nov. 1938. 1.9 Ec7Mil 1937 - 15 - 123. U.S. Dept. of agriculture. Bureau of agricultural economics. Stocks of evaporated and condensed milk in hands of wholesale grocers in 38 cities. 2pp., processed. Washington, D.C., Nov. 26, 1938. 1.9 Ec7245 124. Vial.Ednund 3a monthly index o f .pe r capita production of. the principal manufactured dairy products. N.Y. (Cornell) ^g r , c l. Dept. Agr. Econ. and Farm Mangt. Farm Econ. no. Ill, pp. 2704-2706. Ithaca, Feb. 1939. 125. Vial, Edmund E. Production and consumption of manufactured dairy prod- ucts. U.S. Dept. Agr. Tech. Bui. 722, 76pp. Washington, D.C., 1940. 1 AgB4Te 126. Whittier, E.O. Greater uses for dairy by-products. U.S. Dept. Agr. Bur. Agr. Econ. AgrV Situation 23(7): 14-16. July 1939. 1 Ec7Ag 127. Wisconr-jp.. Dept. of agriculture. Directory of Wisconsin dairy manu- fac -raring plants in operation August 30, 1939. Wis. Dept. Agr. Bui. 207, 119pp. Madison, Sept. 1939. 123. Wisconsin. University. College of agriculture. Extension service. What about stabilization of butter prices? Wis. Univ. Agr. Col. Ext. Scrv. Econ. Inform for Wis. Farmers 10(1): 1-14. Madison, Jan. 1939. FARM MANAGEMENT 129. 3ennett, K.R. Comparative .cost of fixed and variable dairy rations. N.Y. (Cornell) Agr. Col. Dept. Agr. Econ. and Farm Mangt. F a rm Scon. no. 153, pp. 2827, 2833-2835. Ithaca, Nov. 1939. 130. Brora, A. A. , and Donley, J .3. Product-costs of milk to dealers in the Springfield area, 1935. Mass. Agr. Expt. Sta. Bui. 365, 23pp. Amherst, 1939. 131. Buck, R.X. , Malone, C.C. , and Hopkin3, J. A. Profit in the dairy busi- •ness.- Iov/a. State Col. Agr. and Mech. Arts. Agr. Ext. Serv. and Agr. Expt. Sta. Iowa Farm Econ. 6(4): 8-10. Ames, Apr. 1940. 132. Christensen, Raymond P. Forces causing dairy farmers to make changes in their farm organizations in Barron county, Wisconsin. 70pp., processed. Washington, D.C., U.S. Dept. of agriculture, 3ureau of agricultural economics, Dec. 1939. 1.941 L6F74 - 16 - 133. Conklin," C.T. One-crop farming in the Northeast. Country Gent. 108 (12): 14-15, 77. Dec. 1938. 6 C833 Discusses the problems resulting from one-crop milk farming i n the Northeastern States. 134. Cunningham, L .C. Dairy farm management (Revised July, 1939) N.Y. (Cornell) Agr. Col. Dept. Agr. Econ. and Farm Mangt. A.E. 278, 9pp., processed. Ithaca, 1939. 135. Ellenberger, H.B. Lower production costs a vital factor. Hoard's Dairyman 83(11): 335, 354. June 10, 1939. 44.8 H65 136. Fowler, H.C. Statistical approach to the feed-milk production prob- lems. New England Res. Counc. on Mktg. and Food Supply. Proc. 1939: 44-46, processed. Boston, Mass., 1939. 252.004 N443M 137. Guin, Marvin. An economic study of dairy farming in Oktibbeha and Lowndes counties, Mississippi, 1936-1937. Miss. Agr. Expt. Sta. Bui. 324, 27pp. State College, 1938. 138. Hitchcock, J. A. , and Paquette, L.D. Changes on a group of Vermont dairy farms, 1935-1938. Vt. Agr. Col. Ext. Serv. Vt. Farm Business 6(3): 1-2. June 1939; (4): 1-3. Aug. 1939. Burlington, 1939. 139. Hitchcock, J. A. Milk production per cow and feed costs. Vt. Agr, Col. Ext. Serv. Vt. Farm Business 6(l): 2-3. Burlington, Feb, 1939. 140. Hitchcock, J.A-. , and Paquette, L.N. Studies in Vermont dairy farming. XI. Labor as a cost of production. Vt. Agr. Expt. Sta. Bui. 442, 16pp. Burlington, 1938. Third of a series reporting the results of a study of the business operations during the year ending March 31, 1933, of a group of dairy farms in Addison and Chittenden counties. 141. Hoecker, R.W. , and Misner, E.G. Labor incomes on dairy and cash crop farms in southern Onondaga county, N.Y. (Cornell) Agr. Col. Dept. Agr. Econ. and Farm Mangt. Farm Econ. no. 117, pp. 2899- 2900. Ithaca, Feb. 1940. 142. Huff, K.B. Milking parlor for small dairy farms. Hoard's Dairyman 85(5): 145, 174. Mar. 10, 1940. 44.8 H65 From an address before a sectional meeting of the American Society of Agricultural Engineers. 143. Jensen, Einar. Determining input-output relationships in milk produc- tion. Jour. Farm Econ. 22(1): 249-258. Feb. 1940. 280.8 J822 - 17 - 144. Jensen, Einar. Determining input-output relationships in milk produc- tion. Feed input and milk output preliminary results. 12pp., processed. Washington, D.C., U.S. Dept. of agriculture, Bureau of agricultural economics, Jan. 1940. (Farm management reports no. 5) 1.941 L6F22 145. Jensen, Einar. Some results of the United States Department of agri- culture experiments in dairy feeding. New Engird Res. Counc. on Mktg. and Food Supply. Proc. 1939: 39-42, processed. Boston, Mass., 1939. 252.004* N443M 146. Maryland. Agricultural experiment station. Fifty-first annual report ...for the fiscal year ending June 30, 1938. 88pp. College Park, Md. , 1938? Animal and dairy husbandry (Input as related to output in milk production), p. 37. 147. Miley, D.G. A summary of 12 dairy farm records, Jacksonville area, for the two-year period from July 1, 1937 to June 30, 1939. 25pp., processed. Gainesville, Florida agricultural college, Extension service, 1939. 275.29 F661S 148. Misner, E.G. Relation of size of cow to production and cost of milk on 94 grade A farms in the Tully-Homer area. . IT. Y. (Cornell) Agr. Expt. Sta. Bui. 719, 25pp. Ithaca, 1939. 149. Putnam, P.L. Profit factors on Connecticut dairy farms. Conn. (Storrs) State -Col. Ext. Serv. Econ. Digest for Conn. Agr. no. 74, pp. 615- U.6. Storrs, Jan. 1939. •■■ 150. Reed, O.E. Reducing costs of producing milk. Hoard's Dairyman 85(5): 140, 159. March 10, 1940. 44.8 H65 The latter half of an address "before the recent convention of the llational Milk Producers' Federation. 151. Space, Ralph. "A penny saved - " How I try to cut the cost of pro- ducing milk. Aner. Agr. 136(16): 394. Aug. 5, 1939. 6 Am3 152. Spencer, Leland. Two alternatives for dairymen. Amer. Agr. 136(26): 636. Dec. 23, 1939. 6 Am3 153. Williamson, Paul. Costs and returns from dairy cows on selected Hew York state farms. Based on cost-account records for the years, 1935, 1936 and 1937. N.Y. (Cornell) Agr. Col. Dept. Agr. Econ. and Farm Mangt. A.E, 248, 8pp., processed. Ithaca, Jan. 1939. 154. Wright, T.K., and 3altzer, A.C. Profitable dairy management. Mich. Agr. Expt. Sta. Spec. Bui. 297, 57pp. East Lansing, 1939. - 18 - MARKETING 155. Andes, James. Problems in' the "basic- surplus plan in the Philadelphia, milk shed. 166pp. Philadelphia, 1937. 281.344 An2 Thesis (Ph.D) - University of Pennsylvania. Bihliography, pp. 162-166. 156. Bartlett, R.W. Increasing milk consumption through use of quantity discounts. 111. Agr. Expt. Sta. Dept. Agr. Econ. 111. Farm Econ. no. 58, pp. 329-331. Urbana, 1940. 157. Bartlett, R.W. Prospects for exports of dairy products. 111. Agr. Expt. Sta. Dept. Agr. Econ. 111. Farm Econ. no. 56, pp. 301-303. Urbana, 1940. 158. Bell, E.W. Adapting pooling plans to milk markets. A comparison of dealer pool and market-wide pool operations. Ma^ss. State Col. Ext. Serv. Farm Econ. Facts 13(1): 2-3. Amherst, Jan. 1940. 159. Bishop, George R. An analysis of dealers' sales of milk and cream in the Buffalo market on December 9, 1937. N.Y. (Cornell) Agr. Col. Dept. Agr. Econ. and Farm Mangt. A.E. 253, 18pp., processed. Ithaca, 1939. In cooperation with Division of Milk Control, New York State Department of Agriculture and Markets. 160. Bishop, George R. Milk sales "by stores in Buffalo. N.Y. (Cornell) Agr. Col. Dept. Agr. Econ. and Farm Mangt. Farm Econ. no. 113, pp. 2791-2793. Ithaca, May 1939. 161. Blanford, Charles. Day-of- the -week variations in the store sales of milk and cream in the Hew York market. N.Y. (Cornell) Agr. Col. Dept. Agr. Econ. and Farm Mangt. Farm Econ. no. 112, pp. 2755- 2756. Ithaca, Apr. 1939. Based on a study in cooperation with the Bureau of Agricul- tural Economics, U.S. Dept. of Agriculture. 162. Blanford, Charles. The milk supply for the New York market. N.Y. (Cornell) Agr. Col. Ext. Bui. 396, 23pp. Ithaca, 1938. 163. Blanford, Charles. Relation of family income to prices and sales of fresh milk, cream, and evaporated milk by stores in the New York ' market. N.Y. (Cornell) Agr. Col. Dept. Agr. Econ. and Farm Mangt. Farm Econ. no. Ill, pp. 2720-2723. Ithaca, Feb. 1939. 164. Blanford, Charles. Sales .of milk by retail stores in the New York market. June 1938. N.Y. (Cornell) Agr. Col. Dept. Agr. Econ. and Farm Mangt. A.E. 237, 18pp., processed. Ithaca, 1938. - 19 - 165. Bressler, E.G., jr. The proposed study of country milk stations and country station operations. New England Eos. Counc. on Mktg. and Food Supply. Proc.Apr. 27, 1938, pp. 1-5, processed. Eoston, Mass. C 1938 D 252.004 N443M 1938 166. Bressler, E.G., jr. E e view of work completed c on New England milk marketing] and present status of the country plant study. New England Ees. Counc. on Mktg. and Food Supply. Proc, Apr. 24 and 25, 1940, pp. 25-28, processed. Boston, Mass. c 1940 3 252.004 N443M 1940 167. Bressler, E.G., jr. Transportation and country assembly of milk. Sour. Farm Econ. 22(1): 220-224. Feb. 1940. 280.8 J822 168. 3rown, A.A. , and Donley, J.S. Milk cartage in the Southwick-Agawam area of the Springfield milkshed. Mass. Agr. Expt. Sta. Bui. 363, 26pp. Amherst, 1939. Summarized in Farm Economic Facts (Massachusetts), v. 12, no. 8, Aug. -Sept. 1939, pp. 1-2. 169. Brubaker, D.D. Adjusting deliveries to class sales [milk]. U.S. Farm Credit Admin. News for Farmer Coops. 5(10): 16-17. Jan. 1939. 166.2 N47 170. Christian, C.F. Can we banish abuses and unfair practices in Ohio's dairy markets? Ohio Farmer 184(5): 8, 25. Aug. 26, 1939. 6 0h3 171. Colvin, Esther M. , comp. Transportation of agricultural products in the United States, 1920-June 1939; a selected list of references relating to the various phases of railway, motor, and water car- rier transportation. U.S. Dept. Agr. Bur. Agr. Econ. Econ. Bibliog. 81, 3pts., processed. Washington, D.C., 1939. 1.9 Ec73A lairy products, pp. 105-121 of Pt. 1. Consult also the index (Ft. 3) under subject, Milk. 172. Bankers, W.K. Surplus problems in dairying. Minn. Univ. Dept. Agr. Divs. Agr. Econ. and Agr. Ext. Farm Business Notes, no.199, p. 3. University Farm, St. Paul, July 1939. 173. De Paul university. Eesearch bureau. Eeport on milk survey, city of Chicago, Illinois. 22pp., processed. c Chicago, 111., 1938;) 281.344 D44 Eeport signed: L.M, McDermott. 174. Dickey, Eoger C. The middleman's profit. Haywards believe it belongs to the farmer and get it by selling direct from producer to con- sumer. New England Homestead 112(18): 5, 11. Sept. 23, 1939. 6 N442 - 20 - 175. Donley, J.E. Toward a perfect milk market. Mass. Agr. Expt. Sta. Bui. 366, 28pp. Amherst, 1939. A study of the Worcester market. "The data were collected "by Chester Smith for his thesis entitled Some Economic Aspects of Marketing Fluid Milk in Worcester, Massachusetts, submitted for the Master's degree at Massachusetts State College in 1937." 176. Douglas, Jean E. Headed right. The way out lies in a more practical attitude toward the milk market. New England Homestead 113(6): 16, 17. Mar. 23, 1940. 6 N442 177. Dow, George F. An economic study of milk distribution in Maine mar- kets. Maine. Agr. Expt. Sta. Bui. 395, pp. 519-674. Orono, 1939. 178. Dow, George F. Reducing cost of distributing milk in Maine. Jour. Farm Econ. 21(1): 309-314. Feb. 1939. 280.8 J8 22 179. Farmer relations need more cultivation. Food Indus. 11(12): 667-668. Dec. 1939. 389.8 F737 Urges the need for educating the farmer in the various costs incurred in getting the milk to the consumer. 180. Flynn, John T. The milk monopoly. New Repub. 98(1270): 250. Apr. 5, 1939. 280.8 N Calls attention to the testimony of Dr. Frederic. Howe, Mr. Kemper Simpson, and Mr. George A. Johnson before the TNEC in Washington showing the results of selling milk by monopoly con- cerns. The writer particularly condemns the practice of deliver; 7 of milk to the home instead of buying it direct from the store. 181. Hammerberg, D.O. Allocation of milk supplies among contiguous markets. Jour. Farm Econ. 22(l): 215-219. Feb. 1940. 280.8 J822 182. Howe, Frederic C. The milk market muddle. South. Planter 100th year (7): 22. July 1939. 6 3o89 183. Hughes, E.M. Milk retailing by producer-distributors in New York state. N.Y. (Cornell) Agr. Col. Dept. Agr. Econ. and Farm Mangt. A.E. 239, 18pp., processed. Ithaca, 1939. 184. Klinefelter, H.E. Missouri's filled milk case. Missouri Farmer 31(6): 8. Aug. 15, 1939. 6 M696 185. Mclntyre, E.R. Temporary snarl in milk markets. Price tangles arouse producers to action. Wis. Agr. and Farmer 66(7): 6.27, Apr. 8, 1939. 6 W751 186. MacLeod, Alan. Plans for preparation of a report on the supply side of New England milk markets. Now England Res. Counc. on Mktg. and - 21 - Food Supply. Proc, Apr. 24 and 25» 1940, pp. 29-30, processed. Boston, Mass. C 1940 D 252*004 N443M 1940. 187* Massachusetts* State college, Extension service. Report of the Sub- committee on marketing milk in Massachusetts, arranged "by Ells- worth W. Bell, extension economist, and prepared at the request of the Committee on problems affecting the dairy industry of Massachusetts. 55pp. Amherst, 1938. An earlier edition, processed, was issued. This edition has 20 additional pages including the report of the Committee on Milk Production Problems. 188. Milk chiefs deny monopoly. Business Week, no. 505, p. 16. May 6, 1939. 280.8 Sy8 A review of the testimony of the presidents of the National . Dairy Products Corporation (Mr. Thomas H. Mclnnerney) and of the Borden Co. (Mr. Theodore G. Montague) before the Temporary National Economic Committee, in which they tell "their side of the argument over the causes of distress in the dairy industry." Primary causes of the dairy problem as listed by the company presidents are given. 189. Montague, Theodore G. Is there a milk monopoly? A statement by... president of the Borden company, presented to the Temporary national economic committee, constituted pursuant to joint reso- lution of Congress. 41pp. c New York? N.Y. , 1939 3 281.344 M76 190. Moon, E.A. The truth about a quart of milk. Rural New Yorker 99(54.69): 35, 50, 51. Jan. 27, 1940. 6 R88 . 191. Mortenson, W.P. Legal possibilities and -limitations of milk distr- ibution as a public utility. 'Jour. Land. & Pub. Util. Econ. 15(4): 438-447. Nov. ' 1939;.' 16(1) : 61-71. Feb. 1940. 282.8 J822 192. New York (State) Commissioner of agriculture and markets. Report... regarding the audit of milk dealers and cooperative associations. • 632pp. Albany, N.Y. , 1938. (Legislative document 1938, no. 100) 193. " New York (State) Dept. of agriculture and markets. Annual report... for the year 1937. 257pp. Albany, 1938. . Partial contents: -Marketing, pp. 94-112; Milk control, pp. 113- 168. 194. Nicholson, Arnold. Breaking the bottleneck. Country Gent. 110(6): 13, 41-42. June 1940. 6 C833 Relates how "producers, distributors and consumers are all get- ting a break in the market place, through the introduction of paper containers, two-quart bottles, gallon glass jugs, and quantity discount schemes such as the Elwell plan" for milk in certain cities. - 22 - 195. Pollard, A.J. Duplication in delivery. of milk to stores in New York City. N.Y. (Cornell) Agr. Col. Dept. Agr. Econ. and Farm Mangt. Farm Econ. no. 116, pp. 2863-2865. Ithaca, Jan. 1940. 196. Rinear, E.H. Milk distribution costs of producer-distributors and sub-dealers in New Jersey. N.J. Agr. Expt. Sta. Bui. 663, 56pp. New Brunswick, 1939. 197. Rowe, Harold B. Should the emphasis of the New England milk marketing research program be changed? New England Res. Counc. on Mktg. and Food Supply. Proc, Apr. 24 and 25, 1940, pp. 33-36, pro- cessed. Boston, Mass. C 1940 D 252.004 N443M 1940. 198. Sherman, R.W. , and.McBride, C.G. Ten years of farm sales of milk in four Ohio markets. Ohio Agr. Expt. Sta. Bui. 609, 38pp. Wooster, 1939. 199. Spencer, Leland, and Kling, Herbert. The distribution of milk by sub- dealers in New York City. N.Y. (Cornell) Agr. Col. Dept. Agr. Econ. and Farm Mangt. A.E. 320, 10pp., processed. Ithaca, May 1940. "A report to Dr. John L. Rice, Commissioner of Health of the City of New York, based upon a study... in cooperation with the Bureau of Agricultural Economics, United States Department of Agriculture." 200. Spencer, Leland, and Blanford, Charles. The distribution of milk through health and welfare depots in New York City, N.Y. (Cornell) Agr. Col. Dept. Agr. Econ. and Farm Mangt. A.E. 273, 17pp. , processed. Ithaca,, 1939. "A report, to Dr. John L. Rice... based upon a study... in co- operation with the United States Burdau of Agricultural Econo- mics. " Presents facts concerning the operation of the "8 cent" milk plan in New York City in 1934, "together with a brief appraisal of its effects on prices and consumption of fluid milk." 201. Spencer, Leland. Family incomes and milk consumption. Amer. Agr. 137(8): 249. Apr. 13, 1940. 6 Am3 Tells of a study made by Dr. Charles Blanford of consumers 1 purchases of milk, cream and evaporated milk in New York City. It was found that people with low incomes used less milk than those with higher incomes and purchased a cheaper grade of milk at the stores. 202. Spencer, Leland. Ways of reducing costs of distributing milk in New York. Jour. Farm Econ. 21 (l): 291-298. Feb. 1939. 280.8 J822 - 23 - 203. Stevenson, Jordan & Harrison. .A. study of nilk distribution in New Haven, with recommendations. June 26th, 1939. 76pp., processed. New Haven, Conn. cl939 3 280.344 St4 204. The struggle to raise nilk prices. A statement of the present dairy market- ing situation in the New York milk shed. Aner. Agr.. 136(18): 439, • 442. • Sept-. 2, 1939, • 6 An3 205. Tinley, J. M. Reducing cost of distributing milk in California. Jour. Farm Econ. 2l(l): 299-308. Feb. 1939. 280.8 J822 ; ,y 206. Ulrey, Orion, The Kalamazoo milk market. Mich. Agr. Expt. Sta. Special Bui. 300,- 44pp. East Lansing, 1939. 207. U. S, Dept. of agriculture. Agricultural adjustment administration. Con- sumers 1 counsel. Boston drinks "surplus" milk. A new plan sponsored by the Department of agriculture opens up the slttice gates to let 'more milk flow into the homes of needy families and to build up farmers 1 income from surplus milk. U. S. Dept. Agr. Agr. Adjust. Admin. Con- . sutlers' Counsel. Consumers 1 Guide 6(10): 3-4. Nov. 1, 1939,1.94 Ad422C 208. U. S. Dept. of agriculture. Extension service. Low-cost milk program seeks wider outlets. U. S. Dept. Agr. Ext. Serv. Ext. Serv. Rev. 11(3): 42. Mar. 1940. 1 Ex892Ex Tells of the low-cost milk programs that are in effect in the Boston and Chicago milk markets. 209. Wichern, Arthur, Single-trip containers attract attention. Will Wisconsin adopt new milk bottle used in New York for eight years? Wis. Agr. and Earner 66(2): 5,. 17.;. Jan. 28, 1939. 6 W751 MARKETING CONTROL' 210. Agricultural marketing agreement act... ,c case of: CCA. 2 (Chase, C J.); United States v. Adler's Creamery, inc., Nov. 13, 1939. U. S. Law Week 7(23, sect. 2): 596-597. Nov. 28, 1939. 274.008 Un32 Decision in case affecting the New York metropolitan marketing area. 211. Anti-trust case involving milk industry. U. S. Law Week 7(20, sect. 3): 528-530. Nov. 14, 1939. 274.008 Un32 In this case entitled United States v. The Borden Company et al., No, 397, two questions are presented: "(l) Whether the holding of the District Court that the Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act of 1937 has removed the production and marketing of milk from the purview of the Sherman Act involves a construction of the Sherman Act so that a direct appeal lies to the Supreme Court under the Criminal Appeals Act, (2) Whether the Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act and other - 24 - agricultural legislation operates to exempt combinations in the milk industry from prosecution under the Sherman Act," 212. Bartlett, R, W, Considerations in governmental price control of dairy products. Ill, Agr. Expt. Sta. Dept. Agr. Econ. 111. Farm Econ,, no. 45, pp. 222-227. Urbana. Feb. 1939. 213. Bentley, Julian. Changes asked in c Chicago] milk order. Prairie Farmer 112(7): 12, 13. Apr. 6, 1940. 6 P833B 214. Bentley, Julian. U. S. control for Chicago milk shed. Prairie Farmer 111(18):- 6. Sept. 9, 1939. 6 P833B 215. Brown, Betty. Oregon milk control. Oreg. Law Rev., Dec. 1939, pp. 38-50. Not seen. 216. Butz, Verio. Indiana milk law tries to solve market ills. Combines best parts of other states 1 laws into local committee control. Prairie 'Farmer lll(l): 5. Jan. 14, 1939. 6 P833B 217. California. Dept. of agriculture. c General order] nos. 27-28, 38, 44-45, 47-48. Sacramento, 1937-1938. 281.010 C122 Contents: No. 27. Amended stabilization and marketing plan for fluid milk. San Francisco marketing area. 12pp.; No. 28. Amended stabilization and marketing plan for fluid milk. Alameda County market- ing area. 13pp.; No. 38. Findings and order for the establishment of minimum wholesale and minimum retail prices for fiuid milk for the Alameda County marketing area. 8pp.; No. 44. Amendment to the amended stabilization and marketing plan for fluid milk. San Francisco market- ing area. 5pp.;; No. 45. Amendment to the amended stabilization and marketing plan for fluid milk. Alameda County marketing area. 5£>p.; No. 47. Amended stabilization and marketing plan for fluid milk. Sacramento marketing area. 13pp.; No. 48. Findings, order and regu- lations for the establishment of minimum wholesale and minimum retail prices for fluid milk for the Sacramento marketing area. 8pp. 218. Christian, C. F. Plan now for milk legislation. Dairy leaders must agree before program can be passed. Ohio Farmer 183(11): 19. June 3, 1939. 6 0h3 219. Connecticut. Dairy and food commission. Dairy laws... and rules and regu- lations of the Milk regulation board, revised to July 1, 1937. Conn. Dairy and Food Conn. Bui. 12, 102pp. Hartford, 1938? 220. Copeland, Clarence J. Chicago milk pact hearings reveal strong opposition to AAA practices. Food Field Reporter 7(l4): 1, 24. July 10, 1939. 286.83 F73 - 25 - 221. Copeland, Clarence J. Chicago milk pack seen wrecking the industry. Dairymen are now milking everything "but "beef cows in order to cash in on higher prices. Food Field Reporter 8(7): 3, 9. Apr. 1, 1940. 286.83 F73 222. cDigest of opinion of United States District Court for the northern district of Illinois in the case of United States v. Borden Co., July 13, 1939.3 U. S. Law Week 7(3, sect, l): 61. July 18, 1939. 274.008 Un32 "Sherman Act is not applicable to conspiracy to restrain trade "by fixing and maintaining prices of milk in view of subsequent statutes providing for regulation by Secretary of Agriculture." 223. Eastman, E. R, Farmers urge passage of Nunan-Allen Bill, Amer. Agr. 136(9): 215. Apr. 29, 1939. 6 Am3 224. Grigshy, R. M. Federal regulation in the New Orleans milk market. La. State Univ. Dept. Agr. Econ. La. Rural Econ. 2(2): 8-10. University, Apri 1940. 225. Harmon, E, M. Kow the cNew York] milk marketing agreement works. Amer. Agr. 136(3): 65. Feb, 4, .1939. 6 Am3 226. Harris, E. S. , and Miller, P. L. Statement concerning the Calumet, Indiana- Illinois, milk market and the proposed marketing agreement and order. 5?pp.» processed. Washington, D. C. , U. S. Dept. of agriculture, Di- vision of marketing and marketing agreements, Dairy section. Mar. 1940. 1.94 D14Sta 227. Harris, E. S., and Hanson, J. R. Statement concerning the Sioux City milk market and the proposed marketing agreement and order. 92pp. Wash- ington, D. C.,*U. S. Dept, of agriculture, Division of marketing and marketing agreements, Dec. 19, 1939. 1.94 D14Sta 228. Humrickhouse, C. W. The milk control law in Indiana, Missouri Farmer 31(14): 3, 7. July 15, 1939. 6 M696 229. Indiana. Milk control board. Report of the activities of the Milk control hoard of Indiana. 16pp., processed, c Indianapolis, 1938] 280.3449 In2 230. Kansas. State hoard of health. United States Public health service standard milk ordinance, approved by Kansas State board of health and Bureau of dairy industry, U. S. Department of agriculture. 15pp. Topeka, Kans. c 19383 (Bui. May 1938. 2d ed.) 280.344 KL3 231. Kelly, Ernest. Supervision and inspection of milk. U. S. Dept. Agr. Food and Life. Yearbook of Agr. 1939: 360-363. 1939. 1 Ag84 - 26 - 232. Kladakis, [i.e. CladakiS} N.J. Mill: administrator q Chicago-) explains his plans. prairie Farmer 111(19): 15. Sept. 23, 1939, 6 P383B . 233. Klein, Jack. Milk control laws discussed.' Calif. Cult. 86(5): 123. liar. 11, 1939. 6 CI 2 234. Koanig, Nrthpji. Six years of marketing agreements. III. Dairy products. tJ.'S, Dept. A^r. -Bur. Agr. Econ. Agr. Situation 24(3): 21-23. Liar. 1940. 1 Ec7Ag' 235. Layson, S.T. Milk laws then and now. Hoard's Dairyman 84(8): 243. Apr. 25, 1939. 44.8 H65 Beginning with 1858, when the State of Massachusetts enacted a law designed to prevent the adulteration of milk with water (which was the first milk control law enacted by any governing "body in America), the writer describes laws and regulations with reference to milk and milk distribution'. 236. Milk bill [Chicago^ fits anti-trust pattern. Business Week, no. 508, pp. 25, 26. May 27, 1939. 280.8 Sy8 237. Moffett, W.K. Milk regulations in Pennsylvania. Rural Hew Yorker 98(5444- 5445): 86, 119. Feb. 11, 25,. 1939. 6 R88 238. New acts don't void trust law. Business Week, no. 536, pp. 13, 14. Dec. 9, 1939. 280.8 Sy8 Discusses the Supreme Court decision in the Chicago 'milk monopoly' case. 239. New Jersey. Milk control board. Report. . .July 1, 1935-June 30, 1938. 35pp. Trenton, N. J. , 1939. 280.3449 N46 240. New York (State) Legislature. Committee to investigate the milk control law. Report. . .March 22, 1937. 31pp. Albany, J. 3. Lyon co., printers, 1937. (Legislative Document (1937) no. 81. State of New York) 280.344 N485 241. Nos. 771, 826, 827 and 828 - October term, 1938. [Opinion of the Supreme Court in the Rock Royal Co-operative, Inc., case^ U.S. Law Week 6(4, sect. 2): 1459-1470. June 6, 1939. 274.008 Un32 242. Nos. 772, 809 and 865 - October term, 1938. c Opinion of the U.S. Supreme Court in the cases of H.P. Hood & Sons, Inc., the Whiting Milk Company, and E. Frank Branon.] U.S. Law Week 6(4, sect. 2): 1470- 1475. June 6, 1939. 274.008 Un32 243. Pilgcr, A.C. What does 'Mayor LaGuardia want? Now York City can dictate sanitary regulations, but producers must set milk prices. Aner. Agr. 137(6): 175. Mar. 16, 1940. 6 Am3 - 27 - 244. Rhode Island and Providence Plantations. Dept. of agriculture and conserva- tion. Fourth annual report... for the year 1930. 173pp. Providence, ■ • 1939, Board of Milk Control, pp. 151-163." ♦ 245. Rinear, E. H. Some comments on milk control. N. J. State Col. Agr. Ext. Serv. and Agr. Expt. Sta. Econ. Rev. no. 133-135, pp. 2-3, processed. New Brunswick, Apr. -June 1939. 246. Smith, C. W. , Miller, P. L. , and Forest, H. L. Economic statement concern- ing the Providence, Rhode Island, milk market, and the proposed market- • ing agreement and order for that market. 115pp., processed. Wash- ington, D. C, U. S. Dept. of agriculture, Division of marketing and marketing agreements, Dairy section. Nov. 1939. 1.94 D14Sta . . 247. Spencer, Leland. ■ Health regulations and the milk supply. Amer. Agr. 137(2): 47. Jan. 20, 1940. 6 Am3 248. Spencer, Leland. Public regulation of the milk industry. .State Govt. • 12(10): 179-180, 186-190. Oct. 1939. 200.0 St 2 249. Spencer, Leland. Subsidized distribution. Amer. Agr. 136(24): 587. Nov. 25, 1939. 6 An 3 ... Discusses subsidized distribution particularly as applied to milk. The writer thinks that fluid milk producers are not being treated fairly under the federal milk order for Hew York, and that until more is known of the effects of cheap milk plans "the government should foot the entire bill for milk subsidies as it has for the stamp plan and all the other activities of the P.S.C.C." 250. • Spencer, Leland. Subsidized distribution of milk and other products. Amer. Agr. 136(22): 536, 537. Oct. 28, 1939. 6 Am3 251. State regulation of milk industry. U. S. Law Week 7(2, sect, l): 37. July 11, 1939. 274.000 Un32 "California statute providing for regulation of milk industry by Director of Agriculture is constitutional exercise of police power; i • : statate is nob unconstitutional discriminatory legislation; it does not delegate 'legislative power to Director of Agriculture; invalidity of prevision on ground that it confers judicial power on Director, if the provision is invalid on such ground, does not affect validity of other -provisions of statute." 252. Tetro, Robert C. , Hanson, J. R. , and Miller, P. L. Statement concerning the Louisville milk market and a proposed marketing agreement and order. 147pp. Washington, D. C, U. S. Dept. of agriculture, Divi- sion of marketing and marketing agreements, Jan. 1940. 1.94 D14Sta .- 28 -. 253. Tetro, Robert C. t and Miller, P. L, Statement concerning the Washington nilk market and a proposed marketing agreement and order. 94pp f , processed, Washington, D. 0., U. S. Dept. of agriculture, Division of marketing and marketing agreements, Dairy section, Nov. 1939* 1.94 D14Sta 254. Tinley, James Maddison, Lessons from public control in milk marketing. Jour. Farm Econ. 20(4): 807-822. Nov. 1938. 280.8 J822 255. Tinley, James Maddison. Public regulation of milk marketing in California. 213pp. Berkeley, Calif., University of California press, 1938. 280.344 T49 . . 256. U. S. Dept, of agriculture. Agricultural adjustment administration. The federal- state program for the New York milk market. 16pp. Washington, D. C, Oct, 1938. (DM-8) 1.4 Ad47D no. 8 257. U. S, Dept, of agriculture. Agricultural adjustment- administration. Order, ..regulating the handling of milk in the Lowell-Lawrence, Massachusetts, marketing area. Effective February 12, 1939. 12pp. Washington, D. C, 1939. (Order No. 34) 1,4 Ad470 258. U. S, Dept, of agriculture. Agricultural adjustment administration. Order regulating the handling of milk in the New Orleans, Louisiana, marketing area.. Sept. 28, 1939. 10pp. Washington, D. C. , 1939. (0-42) 1,4 Ad470 Amendment no. 1 (4pp.) issued by the Division of Marketing and Marketing Agreements, Apr. 26, 1940. 259. U. S, Dept, of agriculture. Division of marketing and marketing agreements. Amendment no. 1 to order regulating the handling of milk in the New York metropolitan marketing area. Sept. 12, 1939. 2pp. Washington, D. C, 1939. (0-27-2) 1.4Ad470 260. U. S. Dept, of agriculture. Division of marketing and marketing agreements. Compilation of order no, 34, as amended, regulating the handling of milk in the Lowell-Lawrence, Massachusetts marketing area. Feb, 1, 1940, 11pp. Washington, D. C, 1940. (0-34) 1,4 Ad470 261. U, S, Dept. of agriculture. Division of marketing and marketing agreements. Compilation of statistical material covering order no, 27 and the New York metropolitan milk marketing area. Feb. 1940. 118pp. Washington, D. C. , 1940. 1.944 D2C73 262. U. S. Dept, cf agriculture. Division of marketing and marketing agreements. Order, as amended, regulating the handling of milk in the Cincinnati, Ohio, marketing area. May 1939. 10pp. Washington, D. C. , 1939. (0-22, as amended) 1.4 Ad470 Amendment no. 1 (%pp.) issued November 1939, - 29 - 263. U. S, Dept. of agriculture. Division of marketing and marketing agreements. Order, as amended, regulating the handling of milk in the Dubuque, Iowa, marketing area. June 1939. 9pp. Washington; D. C* , 1939, (0-12,. as amended) 1.4 Ad470 264. U. S. Dept. of agriculture. Division of marketing and marketing agreements. Order, as amended, regulating the handling of milk in the Fort Wayne, Indiana, marketing area. Aug. 24, 1939. 11pp. Washington, D. C. , 1939. (0-32) 1.4 Ad470 Amendment no. 1 (2pp.) issued Fet>. 12,' 1940. 265. U. S. Dept. of agriculture. Division of marketing and marketing agreements. Order, as amended, regulating the handling of milk In the Greater Boston, Massachusetts, marketing area. Jan. 19, 1940. 16pp. Wash- ington, D. C. , 1940. 1.4 Ad470 266. U. S. Dept. of agriculture. Division of marketing and marketing agreements. Order, as amended, regulating the handling of milk 'in the Kansas City, Missouri, marketing area. Aug. 28, 1939. 12pp. Washington, D. C, 1939. (0-13) 1.4 Ad470 267. U. S. Dept. of agriculture. Division of marketing and marketing agreements. Order, as amended, regulating the handling of milk in the La Porte county, Indiana, marketing area. Aug. 3, 1939. 12pp. Washington, D. C, 1939. (0-20-1) 1.4 Ad470 ' 268. U. S. Dept. of agriculture. Division of marketing and marketing agreements. Order, as amended, regulating the handling of milk- in the New York metropolitan milk marketing area. Issued Mar. 30, 1940. 16pp. Washington, D. C. , 1940. (Order no. 27, as amended) 1.4 Ad470 269. U. S. Dept. of agriculture. Division of marketing and marketing agreements. Order, as amended, regulating the handling of milk in the St. Louis, Missouri, marketing area. Effective April 5, 19*39. 10pp. Washington, D. C, , 1939. (0-3, as amended) 1.4 Ad470 Amendment no. 1 (5pp.) issued Jan. 11, 1940. 270. U. S. Dept. of agriculture. Division of marketing and marketing agreements. Order, as amended, regulating the handling of milk in the Toledo, Ohio, marketing area. Issued Apr. 25, 1940. 14pp. Washington, D. C. , 1940, (Order series no. 30 ) 1.4 Ad470 271. U. S. Dept, of agriculture. Division of marketing and marketing agreements. Order... making effective the order, as amended, regulating the handling of milk in the New York metropolitan milk marketing area. Issued Apr. 25, 1940. lp. Washington, D. C. , 1940. (Order no. 27-l) 1,4 Ad470 • 272. U. S. Dept. of agriculture. Division of marketing and marketing agreements. Order regulating the handling of milk in the Chicago, Illinois, marketing area. Aug. 28, 1939. 11pp. Washington, D. C. , 1939, (0-41) 1.4 Ad470 - 30 - 273. U. S. Dept. of agriculture. Division of marketing and marketing agreements. . Order regulating the handling of milk in the Louisville, Kentucky, marketing area. Issued Mar. 29, 1940. 12pp. Washington, D. C, 1940, (Order no. 46) 1.4 Ad470 274. U. S. Dept, of agriculture, Division of marketing and. marketing agreements. Order regulating, the handling of milk in the Omaha-Council Bluffs marketing area. Effective April 5, 1939. 10pp. Washington, D. C, 1939, (0-35) 1,4 Ad470 275. U. S. Dept, of agriculture. Division of marketing and marketing agreements. Order regulating the handling of milk in tha Quad Cities marketing area, Jan. 10, 1940. 14pp. Washington, D. C, 1940. (0-44) 1.4 Ad470 276. U. S. Dept. of agriculture. Division of marketing and marketing agreements. Order regulating the handling of milk in the Sioux City, Iowa, marketing area. Issued Apr. 3, 1940. 11pp. Washington, D. C, 1940. (Order no, 48) 1.4 Ad470 277. U. S. Dept, of agriculture. Division of marketing and marketing agreements. Order regulating the handling of milk in the Washington marketing area. Jan. 29, 1940. 12pp. Washington, D. C, 1940. (0-45) 1.4 Ad470 278. U. S. Dept. of agriculture. Division of marketing and marketing agreements. Order. ..suspending section 934.8 (a) (2) (ii) of the order regulating the handling of milk in the Lowell-Lawrence, Massachusetts, marketing area. May 1939. lp. Washington, D. C. , 1939. (O-34-l) 1.4 Ad470 279. U. S. Dept. of agriculture. Division of marketing and marketing agreements. Order. ..terminating certain provisions of order no. 27 regulating the handling of milk in the New York metropolitan marketing area. 2pp. Washington, D. C. , Nov. 1, 1939. (0-27-4) 1.4 Ad470 280. U. S. Supreme court. H. P. Hood & sons, inc., and Noble's milk company, petitioners, vs. the United States of America, and Henry A. Wallace, secretary of agriculture. Whiting milk company, petitioner, vs. the United States of America. ..E. Frank Benson, petitioner, vs., the United States of America. ..on writs of certiorari to the United States Circuit court of appeals for the First circuit... The opinion of the Court. 16pp. c Washington, 1939] 280.344 Un35 "These cases involve the constitutionality of the Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act of 1937 as applied in an order of the Secre- tary of Agriculture, regulating the handling of milk in the Greater Boston, Massachusetts Marketing Area." - p. cl] 281. The United States of America, appellant, vs. Borden company, Charles L. Dressel, Harry M. Reser, et al. Appeal from the District court of the United States for the Northern district of Illinois. Dec. 4, 1939. c Opinion of the Suprene court] U. S. Law Week 7(24, sect. 4): 665- 669. Dec. 5, 1939. 274.008 Un32 - 31 - 282. Weymouth, George. Shall the [Indiana] nilk control law "be continued? Ind. Farmer's Guide 95(l): 4. Jan. 14, 1939. 6 In2 283. Wise, W. S. Pennsylvania's nilk marketing problem. Pa. Farmer 122(9): 336, 337, 352, 360. May 4, 1940. 6 P383 A discussion of the problems connected with marketing milk in Pennsylvania under Pennsylvania 1 s Milk Control Law. P RICES 284. Bartlett, P. W. Price control of dairy production. Hoard's Dairyman 84(12): 372, 383. June 25, 1939. 44.8 E65 "From the viewpoint of farmers the underlying purpose of milk price control is to help them obtain the highest possible income from their dairy enterprises year after year. In order to evaluate whether this objective is being realized, careful consideration should be given to the effect of price-fixing upon: (l) consumption of market milk, ■ (2) milk production, and (3) the use of substitute products." Each of the three subjects noted above is discussed in the article. 285. Brown, Edward Fisher. The truth about milk prices. Nation's Business 28(2): 78-79, 80, Feb. 1940. 286.8 N212 Critical of the article on the milk situation in the November 1939 issue of Fortune. 286. Cosline, H. L. Producers fight for a living price for milk. Amer. Agr. 136(6): 127. Mar. 18, 1939. 6 Am3 287. Donham, Ealph A. Is there a milk cprice] conspiracy? Consumers in Indianapolis making a survey to bring old issue to a show-down. The Farmers Guide 96(l): 19. Jan. 13, 1940. 288. Eastman, E. R, Congratulations to dairymen for $2.27. Highest October milk price in nine years. Amer. Agr. 136(24): 575. Nov. 25, 1939. 6 Am3 289. Eastman, E. R. Fair milk prices depend on dairymen themselves. Amer. Agr. 136(2): 42. Jan. 21, 1939. 6 An3 290. The milk bottle on the U, S. doorstep: reasons for wide variations in prices. U. S. News 7(46): 1, 7. Nov. 13, 1939. 280.8 Un33A 291. Milk in Chicago. When Meadowmoor dairies cut the price of milk two cents, the bombs began to burst. Then, came the U. S. Government with charges of conspiracy. Fortune 20(5): 80-81, 124, 126, 128. Nov. 1939. This article is followed on pp. 83-84, 128, 131-132, 134, 136, by an article entitled: Let 'em drink Grade A. The milk industry sells service. Most of its customers would rather have milk. ..at 4 cents less. - 33 - The following is quoted from p. 81 of the first article: "But so "big and so complex is the milk business that we shall here consider it in two ways. In the article that appears on page 83, the reader will find a discussion of some of the larger problems of the dairy- business and a practical suggestion as to how milk night be brought to the consumer cheaper. Here we shall be looking at a specific city to see how the forces operate that today tend to keep the price of milk so high." 292. Milk price reduction. Business Week, no. 498, p. 31. Mar. 18, 1939. 280.8 Sy8 "On March 1 the enterprising Northland Milk & Ice Cream Co. of Minneapolis, Minn, instituted a new retail price .plan which gives the volume purchaser of creamery products an immediate cash discount. The plan works this way: milk costs 11^ a quart, any additional quarts bought at the sane delivery cost 9fi - and the two cent re- duction on additional units is also available on cheese, cream, and every Northland product except butter." 293. Noyes, Eolton V. "Crash" go milk prices! With marketing order in effect April price would have oeen about $1.50. Amer. Agr. 136(12): 294. June 10, 1939. 6 Am3 294. Reynolds, Howard C. An analysis of milk classification. Manipulations under Pa. control law increase dealer profits. Rural New-Yorker 99(5468): 20. Jan. 13, 1940. 6 R88 . 295. Spencer, Leland. The effect of price fixing upon milk consumption. Amer. Agr. 136(14-15): 352, 376. July 8, 22, 1939. 6 Am3 296. Spencer, Leland. Milk prices in New York under federal and state orders. N. Y. (Cornell) Agr. Col. Dept. Agr. Econ. and Farm Mangt. A.E. 234, 19pp., processed. Ithaca, 1938. 297. Spencer, Leland. A new proposal for pricing milk. Amer. Agr. 136(17): 421, Aug. 19, 1939. 6 Am3 298. Spencer, Leland. New York milk prices under Federal- St ate control. Amer. Agr. 135(23): 641. Nov. 5, 1938. 6 Am3 299. Spencer, Leland. The outlook for milk prices. Amer. Agr. 136(3-6): 79, 113, 145, 141. Feb. 4, 18, Mar. 4, 18, 1939. 6 Am3 300. Spencer, Leland. The outlook for milk prices in New York. Amer. Agr. 135(24): 669. Nov. 19, 1938. 6 Am3 301. Spencer, Leland. Raising milk returns by fixing prices. Amer. Agr. 136(13): 325. June 24, 1939. 6 Am3 302. Spencer, Leland. A revised series of milk prices for New Y'ork. N. Y. (Cornell) Agr. Col. Dept. Agr. Econ. and Farm Mangt. Farm Econ. no. Ill, pp. 2707-2710. Ithaca, Feb. 1939. - 33 - 303. Spencer, Leland. Supply and demand prices for milk. Airier. Agr. 137(l): 15. Jan. 6, 1940. 6 Am3 304. Stitts, T. G-., and others. Relative prices to producers under s-elected types of mi?_k pools. U. S. Farm Credit Ad^in. Coop.. Div. Bui. 25, 127pp. Washington, D. C. , 1938. 166.2 B87 no. 25 Bibliography, p. 113. 305. Whitney, Caroline. What price milk? 79pp. c^ew York, Caroline Whitney memorial fund, 1939]' 281.344 W61 306. Wisconsin. University. College of agriculture. Stabilizing dairy prices. Wis. Agr. Col. Econ, Inform, for Wisconsin Parmer s 10 (2): 1-4. Madison, Peb. 1939. STATISTICS 307. Allred, C, E., Luebke, B. H., and Crawford, W. S. Shipments of dairy products into Knoxville, Term. Tenn. Agr. Col. Agr. Econ. and Sural Sociol. Dept. Monog. 103, 24pp., processed. Knoxville, 1940. 308. Connecticut. Dairy and food commissioner. Thirty- second report... for the fiscal period, July 1, 1936 to June 30, 1938. ,13pp. Hartford, 1938, .Milk statistics, pp. 6-8. 309. New York. Dept. of agriculture and markets. Statistics relative to the dairy industry in New York state 1936-1938. N. Y. Dept. Agr. Bui. 324, 376pp. Albany, 1939. 310. Pollard, A. J., and Champlin, L. P. Receipts of milk and cream at the New York market. 12pp., processed. Washington, D. C. , U. S. Dept. of agriculture, Bureau of agricultural economics, June 1939. 1,9 Ec724Rem 311. Shepard, J, B. More adequate, uniform statistics, sought on city milk consumption. U. S. Dept. Agr. Agr. Mktg. Serv. Marketing Activities 1(1): 5-6. July 1939. 1.9 A81/I34 312. U. S. Dept. of agriculture. Agricultural marketing service. Dairy and poultry market statistics, 1939 annual summary. 41pp., processed. Washington, D. C. , Apr. 1940. 1.9 Ec724An 1939 The 1938 annual summary was issued in March 1939. 313. U. S, Dept. of agriculture. Agricultural marketing service. Disposition and value of milk produced on farms 1937 and 1938. 5pp., processed. Washington, D. C. , 1939. 1.942 D22 M59 - 34 - 314. Vermont, Dept. of agriculture. Nineteenth biennial report.. .1937-1938. 196pp. Montpelier, 1938. » Includes statistics of the dairy industry "by counties. 315. Vial, E, E. Production, consumption of dairy products. U. S. Dept. Agr. Bur. Agr. Econ. Agr. Situation 23(5): 21-22. Hay 1939. 1 Ec7Ag Includes a table which shows per capita production and consumption of all dairy products, 1924-29 average and annually 1930-38. 316. Wisconsin crop and livestock reporting service. Wisconsin agriculture. Wis. Dept, Agr. and Markets. Bui. 188, 101pp. Madison, 1938, Wisconsin Department of Agriculture and Markets and U. S. Bureau of Agricultural Economics cooperating. Includes a brief review of the major trends in Wisconsin crop production in 1934, 1935, 1936, and 1937, together with county esti- mates for the major crops during this period; county tables showing estimates of livestock numbers for January 1, 1935, 1936, 1937, and 1938, and marketings, milk production, and dairy manufactures for recent years. TPADE AGREEMENTS 317. U. S. Dept. of state. The trade-agreements program benefits the dairy industry. 16pp., processed, c Washington, D. Co 1938. 150.1 T673 318. Wisconsin, University. College of agriculture. Extension service, Reciprocal trade agreements and Wisconsin dairying. Wis. Agr. Col, Ext, Serv. Econ. Inform, for Wis. Farmers 9(12): 1-4. Madison, Dec, 1938. TBADE BARRIERS ... 319. Bercaw, Louise 0. State trade, barriers: selected references. U. S. Dept, Agr. Bur, Agr. Econ. Econ. Library List no. 1, rev., 60pp., processed. Washington, D. C, June 1940. Consult the index under subjects Dairy products; Milk. 320. Dairy ban under fire. Business Week, no. 528, p. '30. Oct. 14, 1939. 280.8 Sy8 Last week a newly organized Regional Conference on Dairy Problems assembled in Chicago, with sixty delegates from nine Midwestern States, The conference was called by the Council of State Govern- ments, at Indiana's behest. The delegates heard from several federal officials "that some of their sanitary laws did fall short of per- fection," and the delegates concluded that the Midwestern States had better adopt "reasonably uniform standards of quality and inspection. 1 ' A definite program was set up, the purpose being to break down the barriers that prohibit dairy products of the Middle West from enter- ing the eastern markets. - 35 - 321. Melder, F. E. Trade "barriers and dairy products. 7pp. , processed. Chicago, 111., Council of state governments,. 1933. (Trade barrier research, "bulletin series) 286 C832 322. Miller, Ivan C. Laws forced by farm groups halt trade in processed foods. Food Indus. 11(9): 500-503. Sept. 1939. 389.8.F737 Discusses nainly, state trade barriers in the milk industry and other food manufacturing industries. 323. U. S, Works progress adninistration. Marketing laws survey. Comparative charts of state statutes illustrating barriers to trade between states. Prepared by nenbers of Survey staff under direction of Charlotte A. Hankin . ..S. Chesterfield Oppenhein. 88pp. Washington, D, C. , 1939. 173,2 ¥89 Con Includes a section on dairy products. - 36 - INDEX Item Item Adler's creamery, inc 210 Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act, court cases 210-211,280 Albany milk conference. Record of proceedings 1 Allen, R.H. Supply responses in milk production in the Cabot- Marshfield area. With others 2 Allred, C.E. Shipments of dairy products into Khoxville, Term. With others 307 American institute of cooperation. American, cooperation .3-4 Anderson, D.S. Fundamentals of butter price stabilizati on 4 Andes, James. Problems in the basic surplus plan in the Phila- delphia, milk shed 155 Anthony, E.L. Dairying of tomorrow.. 5 Argentina 29 Baltzer, A. C. Profitable dairy management. With T.K. Wright. .. .154 Bartlett, R.W. Adjusting sales policies to market changes. .4 Considerations in governmental price control of dairy products 212 Increasing milk consumption through use of quantity discounts 156 Price control of dairy produc- tion 284 Prospects for exports of dairy products 157 Bell, 2.W. Adapting pooling plans to milk markets 158 Boston cream market hurt more by domestic dumping than by tariff changes 74 Report of the Subcommittee on marketing milk in Mass- 187 Benkendorf , G-.H. Manufactured milk marketing problems. ........ .3 Bennett, J. J., jr. Report... on the milk industry ..32 Bennett, K.R. . Comparative cost of fixed and variable dairy rations 129 Benson, E.E 280 Bent ley, Julian. Changes asked dn Chicago milk order .213 U.S. control for Chicago milk shed 214 Bercaw, L.O. State trade bar- riers 319 Bishop, Gr.R. Analysis of dealers' sales of milk and cream in the Buffalo market 159 Milk sales by stores in Buffalo 160 Blanford, Charles. Day-of-the-week variations in the store sales of milk and cream in the New York marke t 161 Distribution of milk through health and welfare depots in New York city. Vfith Leland Spencer 200 Milk supply for the New York market 162 Relation of family income to prices and sales of fresh milk, cream and evaporated milk in the New York market. 163 Sales of cream by retail stores in the New York market, June, 1938 75 Sales of evaporated milk by retail stores in the New York marke t .....76 Sales of milk by retail stores in the New York market.. •• ..164 - 37 - Item Blanford, Charles - Continued. ..... study of consumer purchases 'of milk, el ted ............... 201 Boney, M.M. Froblera of quality in manufactured milk 3 Borden company. . . . .113 , 18S , 211 , 222, 281 Branon, S.F. ..... . 242 Bressler, E.G. , jr. Proposed study of country milk stations' and country sta- tion operations .165 Review of work completed and present status of the country plant study 166 Transportation and country assembly of milk 167 Brown, A. A. Mi lie cartage in the Southwick- Agawarc'area of the Spring- field milkshed. With J.E. Donley. 168 Product-costs of milk to dealers in the Springfield area, 1935. With J.E. Donley .130 Brown, Betty. Oregon milk control. 215 Brown, E.F. Milk papers 6 Truth ahout milk prices 285 Brown, G.A. Federal government • s purchase program for dairy products, With others 3 Brubaker, D.D. Adjusting deli- veries to class sales... 169 Buck, R.K. Profits' In" the' dairy business. With others. 131 Buechel, P. A. Manufacture of - dairy products in Texas. ■With 3.K. Johnson 77 Butter consumption', Minneapolis 79 cooperative marketing 115 Los Angeles, Calif ....101 futures... .85-86 gross and net weights in various packages 82 marketing, post-war develop- ments 96 Item Butter - Continued middleman 98 outlets 103 prices and premiums, wholesale. ... .105 stabilization .4 production and trade, world,,.. 117 quality of brands sold at retail 114 standards. ;............. ,118 tariff. 93 Butte rf at 100,102 Butz, Verio, Indiana milk law tries to solve market ills... ..216 California. ..... . .101,205,217,251 * 255 California. Dept. of agriculture. General orders regarding sta- bilization and marketing plans for milk. 217 Camcross, J.W. Production and price trends in the dairy in- dustry and .cost of producing- milk in ITew Jersey. With A. G. Waller .7 Carrigan, J.E. discussion of • • McGrath's Cooperative marketing set-up fpr. Few. England milk 30 "Challenge" cream and butter association »101 Champlin, L.F, . .Receipts of milk and cream at the N.Y. market.. .With. A. J. Pollard 310 Chase, C.J 210 Chattanooga area. milk producers association .66 Cheese factory, Vermont 99 marketing ... . concentration 94-95 post-war. developments. ...... .97 production and trade, world.... 117 quantity discount, Minneapolis. 292 region, Wisconsin, 81 Chicago pure milk association. .... .23 - 38 - Item Item Christensen, R.P. Forces causing dairv farmers to make changes in their farm organizations in Barron county, Wis..'... 132 Christian, C.F. Can we "banish abuses and unfair practices in Ohio dairy markets? 170 Plan now for milk legislation. . .218 Cladakis, N. J 232 Colehank, A.W. Large-scale organi- zation in the dairy industry. With R.K. Froker 83 Colvin.E.M. .Transportation of agricultural products in the U.3 ..................171 Commodity research "bureau* . . inc . Commodity year "book .78 Conklin, C.T. One-crop farming in the Northeast 133 Connecticut. 36,56,149,203,219,308 Connecticut. Dairy and food com- mission. Dairy laws 219 Connecticut. Dairy and food com- missioner.. . Thirty-second report 308 Connecticut. Milk control "board. rules and regulations 219 Connecticut (Storrs). State col- . lege. Extension service. Dairy situation 36 Profit factors on Connecticut . . dairy farms 149 Connecticut milk producers' association 56 Copeland, C.J. Chioago milk pact hearings • . . reveal strong opposition to AAA practices 220 Chicago milk pact seen wrecking the industry 221 Cornelius, P. A. Federal govern- ment's purchase program for .. dairy, products. With others 3 Cornell university. State college of agriculture- See New York (Cornell) State college of agriculture Cosline, H.L. Producers fight for a living price 286 Council of state governments. Trade harrier research "bulle- tin series ...321 Count iss, J.B. Plant production changes in the Middle West... ....4 Cox, R.W. Consumption of "butter "by Minneapolis families. With W . C . Wa i t e 79 Crawford, W.S. Shipments of dairy products into Khoxville, Tenn. With others 307 Cream consumption and family in- comes, New York city. .. .163,201 cooperative association, Los Angeles, Calif .101 market hurt "by domestic dump- ing, 3oston, Mass 74 marketing • . .4 motor truck transportation. 109-110 quality, Michigan. 87 quantity discount, Minneapolis, Minn 292 receipts, New York ....310 sales, New York Buffalo 159 New York 75,161 statistics, New York. 310 Creameries "butterfat procurement, Butler County, la ....100 cooperative 104,108 effect of motor truck on.... 110 Idaho, Boise Valley 107 Kansas 92 marketing methods and probl ems 3-4 Minnesota, Watonwan County... 80 Michigan 87 Creamery industry, Minnesota. .. .88-89 Crowley's cheese factory, Vermont.. 99 Cunningham, L.C. Dairy farm management 134 - 39 - Item Item Curtiss, W.M. Age of cows in dairy herds 67 Marketing cull dairy cows in New York state. With E.H. .i^atzen . 68 Marketing replacements for New York dairy herds. With E.H. Matzen • • • ? • ?71 Number and "breed of cows on . New York dairy farms, 1939.... 69 Origin and destination of New York dairy herd replace- ments 70 Dairy bull associations, coopera- tive 72 Dairy companies large-scale 83 See also names of dairy companies Dairy farm management 129-154 Dairy herds .v 72 New York State. 67-71 ,73, 129, 136, 148 Dairy industry 27 and the Fnilippines 29 and the AAA.."..... ...11-12,27 "bibliographies... . 50,54 by-products .' 91 , 126 Connecticut 36 . . . contribution to social and economic life of the South.... 37 cooperative. 61 effect of agricultural conser- vation program on livestock, Midwest dairy region 18 effect of trade agreements on...... 3 29,317-318 Florida 13 game of chance. •.• 14 history and growth 9 Wisconsin 39 Idaho 17 large-scale 83 laws, Connecticut 219 Maine • . . . . . 26 Minnesota 20-21 Dairy industry - Continued New Hampshire .................. .30 New Jersey. 38 organization for .8 outlook 5,45,51 problems , of 1937-1939 .......... .29 production and price trends, ,....7 profits .131 'program^, national. .29 shifts. . .......... .......... .52 situation. .49a statistics. .. i ......... . . .4?a,312 . New York. .................. .309 Vermont 314 surplus, problem's' • .172 Texas ...'.'.' •.•'• ............ .77 Wisconsin ..;... .54 Dairy products consumption list of reports on, sur- veys of .111 per capita .315 cooperative marketing. ... ..4,32,62 export prospects 157 imports, Knoxville, Term 307 manufactured consumption .125 product ion 119-^120 ,125 milk equivalent 122 per capita, index. 124 Texas. ........... 77 uses 106 Wisconsin • .316 manufacturing plants Indiana • . 84 Wisconsin .127 market news reports...... ..48 marketing agreements. »234 outlook charts .49 prices. 7 control 212 policies 3 stabilizing 306 production •••7 • legislation, Mass .28 per capita .315 reports • .48 - 40 - Item Dairy products - Continued -•' purchase program, Federal ........ .3 sale and distribution, legis- lation , Mass . ................ .28 sales policies, adjusting to market changes .4 ' statistics. . ........ .78,119^307-316 Indiana. ...................... 84 Knoxville, .Term.......... . ...307 Texas 77 Wisconsin. ................... .54 trade harriers. ............. .320-322 bibliography 319 laws 323 transportation bibliography .171 legislation, Mass 28 world wars .121 See also names of dairy products Dairymen's cooperative creamery. .. .107 Dankers, W.E. Surplus problems in dairying. . . .172 Survey of cooperative cream- arios in Watonwan county, 1937 80 De Paul university. Research bureau. Report on milk survey, city of 'Chicago 173 Derrick, E.B. Advantages and .disadvantages of public milk control 3 Base rating plan in- relation to price maintenance 4 Dickey, R.C. Middleman's prof it... 174 Dodge, H.E. Organization for the ■ • dairy industry. ". 8 ' Donham, R.A. Is there a milk conspiracy? 287 Donley, J.E. Milk cartage in the Southwick- ' Agawam area of the Spring- field milkshed. With A. A. Brown 168 Product-costs of milk to deal- ers in the Springfield area, 1935. With A.A.Brown. . .130 Toward a perfect milk market. .. .175 Item Douglas, J.E. Headed right 176 Dow, G.F. Economic study of milk dis- tribution in Maine markets. ,177 Reducing cost of distributing . milk in Maine 178 Dressel , C.L 281 Durand, Loyal, jr. Cheese re- gion of southeastern Wiscon- sin 81 Eastman, E.R. Congratulations to dairymen. •••288 Pair milk prices depend on dai rymen themselves ........ 289 Farmers urge passage of Nunan- Allen bill. ......... ..223 Ebling, W.H. 100 years of agri- cultural statistics 54 Eckles, Combs, and Macy. History and growth of dairy- ing 9 Milk and milk products 9 Efferson, J.H.' Milk production in southeastern Louisiana. With Frank Merrick 10 Ellenborger, H.B. Lower produc- tion costs a vital factor. ••• »»135 El well plan for milk ,194 Engbretson, A.E. Future outlets and outlook for fluid milk under public control... ...3 Evans, R.M. AAA farm program and the north- east dairyman 11 Dairying and the AAA in 1939. •••12 Falls Cities cooperative milk producers ' association •••••60 Florida. Agricultural college. Extension service. Summary of 12 dairy farm records, Jackson- ville area » • 147 Florida. Dept. of agriculture. Dairy industry .....13 Flynn, J.T. Milk monopoly 180 - 41 - Ifcem Item Foelsch, G.G. Estimates of gross and net weights of "butter in various types of packages, • at New York, Chicago, Boston, and Philadelphia 82 Survey of quality of selected b rands of "butter sold in one- pound cartons. With others.,. 114 Forest, H.L. Economic statement concerning the Providence, 'R;I. milk market. With others... 246 Fowler, E.C. Statistical approach to the feed-milk production problems 136 Eraser, W.J. Is dairying a game of chance? .14 Frisbie, D.M. Promoting fluid milk consumption .30 Froker, R.K. Large-scale organization in the ' " ' "dairy industry. With A.W. Colebank .83 Plant production changes in the Middle West 4 Gaumnitz, E.W. Effect of federal milk control ' on cooperatives .55 Federal government's purchase program for dairy products. With others 3 • • Status of federal milk orders and their relation to dairy cooperatives 30 Geyer, K.E. ■ • Milk inspection for sanitation or economic protection? .30 Surplus - stay away from our doori 56 Grigsby, R.K. Federal regulation in the New Orleans milk market.. 224 Grimm, W.G. ' Price returns poli- cies of manufacturing coopera- tives, • .,3 Gain, Marvin. Economic study of dairy farming in ' Oktibbeha and Lowndes counties, Miss .137 Hady, F.T. Probable effect of the Agricultural conserva- tion program on livestock production in the midwest dairy region. With others ..18 Hammerberg, D.O. Allocation of. milk supplies among conti- guous markets • • ,181 Hankin, C.A : 323 Hanson, J.R. Statement concerning the Sioux City milk market. With E,S, Har ri s 227 Statement concerning the Louisville milk market. With others 252 Harmon, E.M. How the New York milk marketing agreement works. 225 Harris, E.S. Statement concerning the Calu^ met-, Indiana- Illinois milk market. With P.L. Miller. . .,226 Statement concerning the Sioux City milk market. Y/ith J.R. Hanson ..227 Harrison See Stevenson, Jordan & Harrison • Hart, E.L. Milk and science ..15 Hay wards, on middleman's prof it ,,.174 ■Heaps, I.W. Twenty years of cooperative milk marketing in Baltimore * ; i ♦ . * » i . . . . • .57 Henry, W.H. Equalizing surplus burdens • through public con- trol .......3 Hitchcock, J. A. Changes on a group of Vermont dairy farms. With L.D. Paquette 138 Milk production per cow and feed costs .139 Studies in Vermont dairy farming. XI. Labor as a cost of production. With L.N. Paquette ,140 Hoccker, R.W. Labor incomes on dairy and cash crop farms in southern Onondaga county. With E.G. Misner 141 - 42 - Item Item Hoffman, O.K. ,jr. Development of public control as a per- manent policy 4 Hole, Drling. Supply responses in milk production in the Cabot-Marshfield area, Vt. ' With' others. 2 Hoimah, C.W. How trade agreements affect the welfare of dairy farmers. .. .3,29 Trade agreement with Argentina. . .29 Hood,' H. P., & sons, inc .242,280 Hopkins, J. A. Profits in the dairy "business. With others. ... .131 Hbughtby,' E.E. Challenge to dairymen 16 Howe, P.C. Milk market muddle. 182 testimony "before TNEC, ,,,,,,,, , ,180 Huff, K.B. Milking parlor for small dairy farms 142 Hughes, E.E. Milk retailing by producer-distributors in New '.'York state 183 Humrickhouse, C.W. Milk control law in Indiana. , 228 Hyre, P.M. Cooperative marketing of dairy products. With H.C. Trelogan 62 Idaho 17 , 107 Idaho. Dept. of agriculture. Bureau of dairying 17 Illinois butter gross and net weights, Chicago 82 quality, sold at retail, Chicago 114 milk control 214 , 232 , 236 court case, Chicago.. 222, 238, 281 low-cost, for needy f ami- lie's, Chicago 208' market and marketing agree- ment and order, Calumet. . .226 Illinois - Continued milk - continued order Chicago .............. 213 ,272 opposed .220-221 Quad Cities. ........... ..275 prices, Chicago... . .... .....291 situation, Chicago ......24 survey, Chicago .....173 radio shows of the Pure Milk Association of Chicago ...... .58 Illinois. Agricultural experiment station. Accuracy of methods of sampling milk delivered at milk plants. .46 Illinois. Agricultural experiment station. Dept. of agricultural economics. Considerations in govern- mental price control of dairy products 212 Increasing milk consump-> tion through use of quantity discounts. 156 Prospects for exports of dairy products 157 Indiana dairy statistics ......84 milk ' »■••-'.. • '■ control ..216 ,.228, 229 ,282 market and markot^ng agree-* ment and order, Calumet., 226 orders Port Wayne .264 La Platte county 267 prices, Indianapolis. ..... ..287 Indiana. Agricultural experiment station. Creamery license division. Twenty- fourth an- nual report. • •• • .84 Indiana. Milk control board. Report •..-... 229 Iowa butterfat procurement 'by creameries in Butler County. ,100 - 43 - Item Item Iowa - Continued effect of agricultural con7 servation program on livestock 18 milk market and marketing agree- ment, Sioux City..... 227 orders Dubuque ................... 263 Quad Cities., 275 Sioux City 227,276 Iowa. Agricultural experiment station. Butterfat procuerment by creameries in Butler County, Iowa .100 Post-war developments in the marketing of butter.... 96 Post-war developments in the marketing of cheese.... 97 Iowa. State college of agriculture and mechanic arts. Extension service. Concentration in cheese marketing. 94 Cutting butterfat marketing costs 102 Profit in the dairy business. 131 Short circuiting the butter middleman 98 Irwin, H.S. Impressions of trading in butter and egg futures .85 Survey of butter futures.. ...... .86 Jensen, Einar. Determining input -output rela- tionships in milk produc- ;.:• tion 143-144 Some results of the United States Department of agri- culture experiments in dairy feeding 145 Jensen, J.M. Study of cream quality from creameries located in southern Michigan 87 Jesness, O.B. Trends in the Minne- sota dairy industry. With E.F. Koller 21 Johnson, E.H. Manufacture of dairy products in Texas. With F. A. Buechel 77 Johnson, G.A. testimony before TNEC. 180 Jones, E.H. Current problems of dairy cooperatives .30 Jordan See Stevenson, Jordan & Harrison. Kansas. 8 ,92,230 Kansas. State board of agricul- ture. Organization for the dairy industry. 8 Kansas. State board of health. U.S. Public health service standard milk ordinance. . . .••••230 Kelly, Ernest. Supervision and inspection of milk ...231 Kentucky. 60, 64, 252, 273 Kentucky. Agricultural experi- ment station. Organization and management of the Falls Cities cooperative milk producers' association ••••.60 Kirkpatrick, M.G. Program for mi Ik 19 Kiadakis, N.J.. 232 Klein, Jack. Milk control laws. ,.233 Klinefelter, H.E. Missouri's filled milk case.. 184 Kling, Herbert. Distribution of milk by sub-dealers in New York City. With Leland Spencer • • .199 Knox, John. Borderline milk and cream market problems ••••.4 Koenig, Nathan. Six years of marketing agreements 234 Koller, E.F. Minnesota creamery industry, 1934-1937 88 Recent trends in the Minnesota dairy industry .......20 Some aspects of creamery opera- tions in Minnosota in 1938. ..89 Survey of cooperative cream- eries in Watonwan county, 1937 80 - 44 - Item Item Koller, E.F. - Continued Trends in the Minnesota dairy industry. With ■ O.Bi • Jesness 21 Krauss, W.E. Responsibility of *••• the- milk producer to the con- sumer . . .. 22 La Guardia, Mayor .243 Laughlin, C.W. Initial estab- lishment of price policies ...3 Lauterbach, A.H. future for milk 23 Pure milk "goes to town" via -•••••■ radio.- 58 Situation in Chicago milk shed... 24 Layson, S.V. Milk laws then and • ' • now 235 Livestock, effect of agricultural conservation program on Mid- west dairy region... 18 Loui siana 10 , 224, 258 Louisiana. State university. Dept. of agricultural economics. Federal regulation in the New Orleans milk market. . .224. Milk production in south- eastern Louisiana 10 Luebke, B.H. Shipments of dairy products into Knoxville, Tenn. With others 307 McBride, C.G. Ten years of farm sales of milk in four Ohio markets. With'R.W. Sherman 198 McDermott, L.M. Report on milk survey, city of Chicago 173 McGrpath, John. Cooperative mar- keting set-up for New England mils. 30 Mclnnemey, T.H. Statement be- fore TNEC 25,188 Mclntyre, E.R.- • Temporary snarl in milk markets 185 • MacLeod, Alan. Plans for prepara- tion of a report on the supply side of New England milk . -'.: markets. .186 Maine 26,177-178 Maine. Agricultural experiment station. Economic study of milk distribution in Maine markets ..177 Economic study of the • -dairy industry r?»26 Malone, C.C. Profits in the dairy- business. With others.... 131 Malo tt * • D. W. Agri cul tural industries. With B.F. Martin.... 27 Markham, L.A. Equalizing surplus burdens in a fluid milkshed.... , .3 Martin, B.F. Agricultural indus- tries. With D.W. Malott 27 Maryland 57,146 Maryland. Agricultural experi- ment station. Fifty-first annual report 146 Massachusetts. Boston cream market hurt by domestic dumping .....74 butter, gross and net weights in packages, Boston 82 milk adulteration 235 cartage in the Southwick- Agawam area, Springfield milkshed 168 control, Boston 280 cost to dealers, Spring- field area 130 . lowTCOst for needy f amir- • lies 207-208 marketing ...187 Worcester. 175 orders Boston area • .265 . Lowell-Lawrence area 257,260,278 pooling 158 Massachusetts. Agricultural - - experiment station. Milk cartage in the South- wick-Agawam area of the Springfield milkshed..... 168 - 45 - Item Item Massachusetts. Agricultural experiment station. - Cont'd Product-costs of milk.tQ. dealers in the Spring- field area, 1935. ..... ........130 Toward a perfect milk market 175 Massachusetts. Committee on prob- lems affecting the dairy industry 187 Massachusetts. Special commission... of the laws relating to milk and milk products. Report .♦.♦•28 Massachusetts. State college. ' Extension service. Adapting pooling plans to milk markets 158 Boston cream market hurt more by domestic dumping than by tariff changes. ... .74 Massachusetts. State college. Exten- sion service. Subcommittee on marketing milk in Massachusetts. Report .187 Mathis, G.L. New outlook for National dairy 90 Matzen, E.H. Marketing cull dairy cows in Hew York state. With W.M. Curtiss , 63 Marketing replacements for New York- dairy herds. With W.M. Curt-iss '71 Meadowmoor dairies 291 Melde'r, F-.E. Trade barriers and ' dairy products .321' Merrick, Frank. Milk production in southeastern Louisiana.. Witn J.N. Ef f erson 10 Michigan; Agricultural experiment ' station. Zal amaz o o mi Ik marke t ........ 206 Profitable dairy management. .154 ' Study of cream quality from. ' creameries located in southern Michigan 87 •Middle West... .....3-4,320 ' Mighell, R.L. Probable effects of the Agri- cultural conservation pro- ' ' * 'gram on livestock produc- tion in the midwest dairy ' region. With others 18 Supply responses in milk pro- '• duct ion in the Cabot- 'Marshfield area. With others.. 2 Miley, D.G-. Summary of 12 dairy farm records, Jacksonville area. .147 Milk adul t e r at i on , Mas aachus e 1 1 s . . . . 235 and" science 15 base rating plan 4 basic-surplus plan, Phila- delphia 155 by-products 91 canned, consumption and prices as related to demand for fresh milk .111 cartage, Southwick-Agawam area, Springfield milkshed..l68 condensed stocks, wholesale grocers 123 conferences, Albany, N.Y. 1 ' 'consumer, responsibility of producer to. 22 consumption and family incomes, New York City. 201 ' • ' city 311 compared with consumption of evaporated milk ••112 effect of 8-cent milk plan •on, New York 200 •effect of price fixing on .284,295 increasing through use of quantity discounts. .... ,.156 ' ' ' promoting 30 ' " 'containers 194,209 ' control 3,210-283 advantages and disadvan- tages ...3 ' " • ' California 251,255 - 46 - Item Item Milk - Continued control - continued Connecticut. ••••• 219 development as a permanent policy .4 federal effects on cooperatives .55 prices '. . . . 296 , 298 Illinois, Chicago 214,220- 221,232,236 Indiana 216 , 228-229 , 282 Louisiana, Hew Orleans. . .224,258 Massachusetts, Boston 280 New Jersey 239 New York..... .193,223,240, : 256,259,261 Oregon >***•• 215 Pennsylvania 237 , 283 , 294 powers and limitations. ....... #3 responsibilities of a co- operative 4 Bhode Island .245 cooperative associations audit, New York .192 effect of federal control on.. 55 Kentucky 60 organizing 65 relation to milk orders. ..... .30 responsibilities under milk marketing control.. 4 cooperative marketing .63 Connecticut 56 history 59 Kentucky, Louisville and nearby cities. .64 Maryland, Baltimore ...57 New England 30 Tennessee, Chattanooga area. ..66 cost of production. 135,150-151 feed costs............... 129, 139 labor costs 140 New Jersey .<.•*. ....7 New York.... .148,153 cost to dealers, Springfield area, Mass 130 court cases 210-211 , 238 , 241-242,280 Milk - Continued court cases - continued California. • • 251 Illinois . .222,281 dealers 'audit, New York. ...... .. ... .192 Buffalo, N.Y 159-160 deliveries adjusting to class sales... .169 home, versus store "buying., • 180 to stores, duplication in, New York City 195 demand, as related to consump- tion and prices of canned milk . .111 disposition and value, on farms 313 distribution See Milk, marketing 8-cent, New York 200 equivalent of manufactured dairy products 122 evaporated .116 compared with consumption of fresh milk". 112 consumption and family., incomes, New York City... ......163,201 sales, retail stores, New York ...76 stocks, wholesale grocers. ..123 filled 184 inspection 30,231 labor incomes, Onondago county, N. Y. 141 laws, discussed ......235 license, solution of New ^England milk problem... 30 low-cost plan, needy families 207-208 manufactured .....3 markets and marketing 176,180, 182,185 agreements Calumet , Indiana- Illinois market.. .... .226 Louisville, Ky.« 252 - 47 - Item Item Milk - Continued markets and marketing - coiit |d . . -agreements — -continued New York -Gity.-. .......... .225 • • • Providenoe ,• R. I .-. ......... 246 Sioux City, la. . , ....... ..227 ■Washington , D. C. ........ r ? 253 as a public -utility 191 borderline problems. ......... ..4 Calumet, I n diana-Illinois. . . .226 Connecticut ,.- Nfcw Haven. . . . . . .203 control See. -Milk, control. . cost. ........... .......... ,178,190 .... California. .............. ,205 . . Maine........ ............. .178 New Jersey. .196 New York. ................ .202 . direct. .,,... ................. .174 . health and. welfare, depots, ... New York City. ...... '. .... .200 Iowa, Sioux City. ........... .227 . Kentucky , Loui sville ......... 252 . lairs, Massachusetts. ........ . .28 :.^.ne 177 liassachusetts .187 .... Worcester...... 175 Michigan, Kalamazoo 206 New England 165-166 New York 193,204,261 . Ohio 170 research, New England. ...... .197 retail, New York ...183 Rhode Island, Providence, ... .246 .sub-dealers, New York City. ..199 Washington, D.C 253 monopoly 180, 188-189 . Chicago 236,238,291 Indianapolis.. 287 orders . ■ .Calumet, Indiana- Illinois marke t • 226 effect on prices ...293,296 ..Illinois, Chicago, 213,272 Indiana . . Port Wayne 264 La. Porte County.. 267 Milk - Continued orders - continued Iowa Dubuque ........ 263 Sioux City.. „..227,276 Kentucky, Louisville. . . .252, 273 Massachusetts Greater Boston area.. • ...265 Lowell-Lawrence area 257,260,278 Missouri Kansas City.. ..266 St . Loui s ...;.. 269 Nebraska, Omaha- Council Bluffs... 274 New York. ...249-250,268,271,279 Ohio Cincinnati • 262 Toledo .270 Quad Cities 275 Rhode Island, Providence.. ..246 status" and relation to cooperatives ........30 • Washington, D.C 253,277 outlets ♦ 3 ; 'outlook .3 , 23 ; papers,' New York .6 plants, Middle West 4 pooling.-.v. . .......... ..-.'. .158 ,304 price fixing. .243 , 301 • ■ • court decision. ..222 - • •effectsv.v. 284 , 295 prices ..185,284-306 and sales and family in- ■ ' come, New York. ......... .163 ■ Chicago 291 classification, Pennsyl- ■ • vania 294 control ••••••• »284 effect' of control on, • ' ' New York '..' .296,298 ■ effect of 8- cent milk plan ' • on, New York. • . .... .200 effect of marketing order on. .293 index, New York .....302 - 48 - Item Item Milk - Continued prices - continued Indianapolis ?••••• •••287 maintenance, relation to base rating plan 4 minimum wholesale and retail, establishment, Ca3.ifprnia.2l7 New York ....288-289,303 outlook, New York. ..... . .299-300 producer, under milk pools... 304 raising, New York... ....204 producer, responsibility to consumer. 22 producer-distributors... 196 production control .42-43 effect of price fixing on.... 284 input-output relationships. .136, ...143-146 laws , Mas sachusetts ........... 28 Louisiana. 10 per cow, Vermont .139 relation of size of cow to, New York 148 supply responses in Cabot- Marshfield area, Vt.........2 Wisconsin. .316 profit factors, Connecticut 149 program 19 quantity discounts. 156,194,292 radio advertising, Chicago, 111. . .58 receipts, New York 310 returns, ways of increasing.. ....44 sales dealers', Buffalo, N.Y. . .159-160 farm, Ohio markets.. 198 retail , New York.. . .164 store, New York 161 sampling methods , accuracy 46 sanitary regulations 247,320 Kansas 230 New York City. .243 situation .285 Chicago ....24,291 effect of weather on 41 stabilization and marketing plans, California 217 stations, country 165-167 Milk - Continued " s i statistics Connecticut .306 New York................ 261, 310 uniform. .311 strikes..... .................. ..40 sub-dealers ..196,199 subsidies. 249-250 supplies allocation among con- tiguous markets. .. •••••••181 New England •••186 New York .162 surplus, equalizing..... .3 survey, Chicago, 111 ..173 trade barriers See Dairy products transportation • .167 bibliography .171 laws, Massachusetts. ........ .28 Milk research council. Milk papers .6 Milking parlors ••••142 Miller, I.C. Laws forced by farm groups halt trade in pro- cessed foods ..322 Miller, P.L. Economic statement concerning. the Providence, R.I. milk market . Wi th o thers • 246 Statement concerning the Calumet, Indiana- Illinois inilk market. With E.S. Harris 226 Statement concerning the Louisville milk market. With others 252 Statement concerning the Washington milk market. With H.C. Tetro 253 Minnesota consumption of butter by Minneapolis families. 79 cooperative creameries in Watonwan County 80 creamery industry 88-89 dairy industry trends 20-21 - 49 - Item Item Minnesota - Continued effect of agricultural con- servation program on live- stock .18 quantity discount scheme, Minneapolis 292 Minnesota. Agricultural experiment, station. Trends in the Minnesota dairy- industry 21 Minnesota. University. Dept. of agriculture. Divisions of agri- cultural economics and agricul- tural extension. Consumption of "butter "by Minneapolis families. ..... .79 Effectiveness of the butter tariff. 93 Minnesota creamery industry, 1934-1937 .88 Recent trends in the Minne- sota dairy industry 20 Some aspects of creamery operations in Minnesota in 1938 89 Surplus problems in dairy- ing 172 Survey of cooperative creameries in Watonwan county, 1937 80 Misner, E.G. Labor incomes on dairy and cash crop farms in southern Onondago county, With H.W. Hoockor 141 Relation of size of cow to pro- duction and cost of milk on 94 grade A farms in the Tully-Horaer area 148 Mississippi. Agricultural experi- ment station. Economic study of dairy farming in Oktibbeha and Lowndes counties, Miss 137 Missouri ..266,269 Moffett, WrZi Milk regulations in Pennsylvania ' 237 Montague, T.G. Is there a milk monopoly? 189 testimony before TNEC. ..... .188-189 Moon, H.A. Truth about a. quart of milk , 190 Morrow, L.W.W. Role of a public relations policy in the manage- ment and operation of coopera- tive dairy marketing associa- tion • • • . .4 Mortenson, W.P. Legal possibili- ties and limitations of milk distribution as a public utility 191 National cooperative milk pro- ducers' federation. , Educational series 29 History series..... 59 National dairy products corpo- ration 25 , 90 , 113 , 188 National farm chemurgic council, inc. Research committee. Chemurgic potentialities. •• .•••.91 Nebraska 274 Nemaha co-operative creamery association. 1930-1940 year book 92 New England cooperative marketing set-up for milk .30 milk marketing 165-166,197 milk problem and milk license, ,.30 supply side of milk markets, •• ,186 New England institute of ooopera- t ion . Proceedings ,,,,30 New England research council on marketing and food supply. Proceedings 1938 ..........165 . 1939 136 ,145 1940 166,186,197 New Hampshire. Dept. of agricul- ture. Dairy industry 31 New Jersey... 7,38,196,239 New Jersey. Milk control board. Report. 239 New Jersey.. State college of agri- culture. Agricultural exten- . sion service and agricultural experiment station.. Dairy problems 38 - 50 - Item Item .New Jersey. State college of agri- culture. Agricultural exten- sion service and agricultural .experiment station. -Cont'd Some comments on milk control. 245 New Jersey. State' college of agri- culture. Dept. of agricultural economics. Production and price . . .t rands in the dairy industry and cost of producing milk in New Jersey .7 New York. ,. • . . . . Albany milk conference.. ........ ..1 . . . audit of milk dealers and co- operative associations 192 butter gross and net weights in packages 82 '».., quality sold at retail. ..... .114 . cost and returns from dairy cows. 153 dairy herds 67-71 , 73 dairy products, index of pro- duction. . . .' 124 dairy statistics 309 labor incomes on dairy and cash • crop farms, southern Onondaga county 141 milk consutrption ' .-.'■■ :'.:••<- and family incomosu...l63,201 - off cct of price fixing on. 295-296 containers 209 , . . control.. 193, 223, 240, 256, 259, 261 , . . . costs... 148 decision in court case ..210 duplication in delivery of, ..... to stores ..195 industry 32 marketing. .' 193 agreement ...225 by sub-dealers 199 costs ........202 retailing by producer- distributors 183 orders 249-250 , 268 , 271 , 279 New York - Continued milk - continued papers... .................... .6 prices .............. 288-289 , 303 index. .302 outlook .299-300 raising ..••••204 under control ............ 298 production control.. ..42 receipts 310 sales .159-161 ,164 situation 33-35,243 supply for New York market.. 162 sales of cream by retail stores ....75 sales of evaporated milk by retail stores .76 New York. Agricultural experiment station. Milk distribution costs of producer-distributors and sub-dealers in New Jersey.. 196 New York (Cornell) State college of agriculture. Dept. of agricultural economics and farm management. Age of cows in dairy herds 67 Analysis of dealers' sales of milk and cream in the Buffalo market 159 Comparative cost of fixed and variable dairy rations 129 Consumption and prices of canned milk as related to the demand for fresh milk Ill Costs and returns from dairy cows: on selected N;w York state farms 153 Dairy farm management. ..... .134 Day-of-the-week variations in the store sales of milk and -cream in the New York market ...161 Distribution of dairy cattle in Chautauqua County, New York, 1937 73 - 51 - Item Item New York (Cornell) State college of agriculture. Dept. of agricultural economics and farm management. - Continued Distribution of milk by sub-dealers in New York City.... 199 Distribution of milk through health and welfare depots in New York City 200 Duplication in delivery of milk to stores in New York City 195 La"bor incomes on dairy and cash crop farms in south- ern Onondago county. . .... .141 Marketing cull dairy cows in New York state .68 Marketing replacements for New York dairy herds 71 Milk prices in New York under federal and state orders 296 Milk production control 42 Milk retailing by producer- distributors in New York state 183 Milk sales by stores in Buffalo , 160 Milk supply for the New York market 162 Monthly index of per capita production of the prin- cipal manufactured dairy produc t s , . « . 124 Number and breed of cows on New York dairy farms, 1939 ... 69 Origin and destination of New York dairy herd re- plrcencnts 70 xtolction of family income to prices and sales of fresh milk, cream and evaporated milk in the New York market 163 New York (Cornell) State college of agriculture. Dept. of agricultural economics and farm management. - Continued Relation of size of cow to production and cost of milk on 94 grade A farms in the Tully- Komer area... ..148 Revised series of milk prices for New York 302 Sales of cream by retail stores in the New York market, June, 1938 75 Sales of evaporated milk by retail stores in the New York market ....76 Sales of milk by retail stores in the New York market 164 New York (State) .Attorney- general's office. Report... on the milk industry ..32 New York (State). Commissioner of agriculture and markets. Report . . . regarding the audi t of rnilk dealers and coopera- tive associations ....192 New York (State). Dept. of agri- culture and markets. ■. Annual report .....193 Statistics relative to the dairy industry ..309 New York (State) .Dept. of agri- culture and markets. Division of milk control. Analysis of dealers' sales of milk and cream in the Buffalo ■ market 159 New York (State). Legislature. Committee to investigate the milk control law. Report 240 Newman W.A. Effectiveness of the butter tariff 93 Nicholls, W.E. Concentration in cheese mar- keting .94 - 52 - Item Item Nicholls, W.H. - Continued Post-war concentration in the cheese industry ......95 P st-\var developments in the marketing of butter. .... ..96 Post-war developments in the marketing of cheese 97 Short-circuiting the "butter middleman. .98 Nicholson, Arnold. Breaking the "bottleneck .194 Noble ' s milk company .280 Northeastern States 11,133 Northland milk & ice cream co......292 Noyes, H.V. "Crash" go milk prices] ........ .293 •Milk situation in New York. ...... .33 New York milk problems. ......... .34 New York milk situation 35 Nunan-Allen pill. 223 Ohio 22,170, 198 , 262, 270 Ohio. Agricultural experiment station. Responsibility of the milk producer to the consumer. ..22 Ten years of farm sales of milk in four Ohio mar- kets 198 Oppenheim, S.C.... 323 Oregon... 215 Orton, Vrest. Country industry 99 Pabst, W.R. , jr. Butter and oleomargarine. 167 Pan American union. Division of agricultural cooperation. Cooperative creameries in the U.S 108 Organizing fluid-milk mar- keting cooperatives in the United States 65 Paquette, L.D. Changes on a group of Vermont dairy farms. With J. A. Hitchcock 138 Paquette, L.N. Studies in Vermont dairy farming. XI. Labor as a cost of production. With J. A. Hi tchcock 140 Pennsylvania....... 82 ,155, 237, 283, 294 Perregaux, E.A. Dairy situa- tion... •••••36 Philippine Islands. ............... .29 Pilger, A. C. What does Mayor La G-uardia want ? 243 Pollard, A.J. Duplication in delivery of milk to stores in New York City 195 Receipts of milk and cream at the New York market. With L.F. Champlin 310 Polikoff, Harry. Powers and limitations of public milk control authorities .3 Price, H.B. Organization and management of the Falls Cities cooperative milk producers' association ......60 Pure milk association of Chicago. #.58 Putnam, P.L. Profit factors on Connecticut dairy farms. ..... ..149 Quintus, P.E. Butt erf at procurement by creameries in Butler . county, Iowa. With Frank Robotka 100 "Challenge" - means just that,. 101 Cutting butterfat marketing costs .102 Sales methods of local co- operative creameries .....4 Selecting outlets for butter, ,.103 •Trucks change cream-marketing picture. With Frank Robotka. 109 Using your co-op creamery. ..... 104 •Wholesale butter prices and premiums •••• 105 Reed, D.W. , discussion of McG-rath's Cooperative market- ing set-up for New England milk 30 Reed, O.E. New developments in the uses of manufactured dairy products ..106 - 53 - Item Item Reed, O.E. - Continued Reducing costs of producing milk 150 What dairying can contribute to the social and economic life of the South 37 Reed, 0.1.1. Responsibilities and services of a cooperative under public milk marketing control,.... ...4 Regional conference on dairy problems . . •••••• ?320 Reid, E.B. Dairy co-op leads the way 107 Report of conference on publi- city and public relations policies of cooperatives. With V. C. Sherman ,4 Reser , H.M 281 Reynolds, E.C. Analysis of milk classifications 294 Reynolds, Quentin, discussion of McSrrath's Cooperative marketing set-up for New England milk 30 Rhode Island 244,246 Rhode Island and Providence Planta- tions. Board of milk control. . .244 Rinear, E.E. Dairy problems 38 llils distribution costs of producer-distributors and sub-dealers in New Jersey. .. .196 Some comments on milk control. . .245 Roberts, J. 3. Organization and management of the Falls Cities cooperative mill: producers' association 60 Robotka, Frank Butt erf at procurement by creameries in Butler county, Iowa. With P.E. Quintus 100 ' Cooperative creameries in the United States, with Frank Shef rin 108 Tracks change cream-marketing picture. With P.E. Quintus. . .109 Rock royal co-operative, inc 241 Rowe, H.B. Should the emphasis of the !Tew England milk mar- keting research program be changed? Rutgers university See How Jersey. Agricultural college. .197 Schmidt, P.M. Selected biblio- graphy on the dairy industry in America .54 Schoenfield, Clarence. 100 years of Wisconsin dairying 39 Shef rin, Frank. Cooperative creameries in the United States. With Frank Robotka 108 Shepard, J.B. More adequate, uniform statistics, sought on city milk consumption ..311 Sherman, J.E. Probable effects of the Agricultural conserva- tion program on livestock production in the midwest dairy region. With others 18 Sherman, R.W. Ten years of farm sales of milk in four Ohio markets. With C.G. McBride.. ...198 Sherman, V. C. Report of confer- ence on publicity and public relations policies of coopera- tives. With E.B. Reid 4 Simpson, Kemper, testimony before T1ISC 180 Small, Edward. Survey of quality of selected brands of butter sold in one-pound cartons. With others ,114 Smith, C.W. Economic statement concerning, the Providence, R.I, milk market. With others.. 246 Smith, Chester. Some economic aspects of marketing fluid milk in Worcester, Mass 175 Southern States., .37 Spencer, Leland. .Causes of, milk strikes 40 Consumption and prices of panned milk as related to demand for fresh milk Ill - 54 - Item Item Spencer, Leland - Continued Distribution of milk by sub-, dealers in New York City. .... With Herbert ELing 199 Distribution of milk through health and welfare depots in New York City. With diaries Blaaford. 200 Dry weather.- and the milk . . situation .41 Effect of price fixing upon ; . . . milk consumption 295 Evaporated milk. .112 Family incomes and milk con- sumption. .....201 Health regulations and the ' milk supply 247 How. the large dairy companies ' fared in 1938 113 Hunt for more cream 110 Milk prices in N.Y. under federal and state orders 296 . Milk production control ......... .42 Milk production control from the national viewpoint 43 New proposal for pricing milk... 297 New York milk prices under federal-state control 298 Outlook for milk prices 299 Outlook for milk prices. in New York. 300 Penny saved. 151 Public regulation of the milk industry 248 Raising milk returns by fixing prices 301 Revised series of milk prices for New York 302 Subsidized distribution 249 Subsidized distribution of mil}'; and other products. .... .250 Suooly and demand prices for ' 'mill:. 303 Two alternatives for dairy- men. t 152 Ways of increasing farmers' returns for milk. 44 Spencer, Leland - Continued Ways of reducing costs of distributing milk in New York 202 Sprague, G.W. Survey of quality of selected brands of butter sold in one-pound cartons. With others 114 Stevenson, Jordan & Harrison. • ■ Study of milk distribution in Now Haven. , 203 Stine, O.C. Dairy outlook for 1939 • 45 Stitts-, T.3. Contrasting marketing problems, of far-western and middle western co-op creameries.... • .3 Contrasting problems of butter co-ops 115 Cooperative milk marketing in Louisville and other nearby cities. With W. C. Weldeu 64 • • Relative prices to producers. With others.. 304 Sr;ank, Oscar. Federal govern- ment's purchase program for dairy products. With others.,,. . .3 Tator, S.W. Will the milk license solve New Ergland's milk problem? 30 Temporary national economic com- mittee See U.S. Temporary national economic committee. Tennessee .66,307 Tennessee. Agricultural college. Dept. of agricultural econo- mics and rural sociology. Shipments of dairy products into Knoxville, Term. .. ...... ..307 Tereshtenko, V.J. Cooperative dairying 61 Tetro, R.C. Statement concerning the Louis- ••• ville milk market. With others ..252 - 55 - I ten Item Tetro, R. C. - Continued Statement concerning the Washington milk market. With P.L. Miller 253 Texas University. Bureau of "business research. Manufacture of daily products in Texas 77 Tiedeman, E.W. Responsibilities and services of a cooperative under public milk marketing control 4 Tinley, J.L". Lessons from public control in milk marketing 254 Public regulation of milk mar- keting in California.. ..255 Reducing cost of distributing milk in California 205 Tomlinson, I.E. World production and international trade in "butter and cheese 117 Tracy, P.E. Accuracy of methods of sampling milk delivered at milk plants. With 3.L. Tuckey. . . .46 Trask, E.S. Federal government's purchase program for dairy __ products. With others ..3 Trelogan, H.C. Cooperative marketing of dairy products. With P.M. Hyre 62 Using your fluid milk co-op 63 Tuckey, S.L. Accuracy of methods of sampling milk delivered at milk plants. With P.H. Tracy 46 Ulrey, Orion. Kalamazoo milk market* • 206 U.S. Dept. of agriculture 2,280 Cooperative dairy "bull asso- ciations. 72 Pood and life 231 Large-scale organization in the dairy industry .83 Production and consumption of manufactured dairy products. .125 Report of the Secretary of agriculture 47 U.S. Dept. of agriculture. Agri- cultural adjustment adminis-*- t rat ion. AAA farm program and the northeast dairyman. ...... .11 Annual report. 47 Chicago milk pact opposed ..220-221 Dairying and the AAA in 1939 ..12 Effect of federal milk control on cooperatives.. .55 Pederal-state program for the New York milk market. 256 Order regulating the hand- ling of milk in. the Lowell-Lawrence, Mass., area .257 Order regulating the hand- ling of milk in the Hew Orleans, La., area ..258 U.S. Dept. of agriculture. Agri- cultural adjustment adminis- tration. Consumers' counsel. Boston drinks surplus milk 207 U.S. Dept. of agriculture. Agri- _ cultural marketing service. Annual report.... ....47 Dairy and poultry market statistics 312 Dairy market news and re- ports issued "by Agricul- tural marketing service... 48 Disposition and value of milk produced on farms ...313 Handbook of official United States standards for quality of creamery butter 118 More adequate, uniform sta- tistics, sought on milk consumption • .311 Problems in adopting the milk cow ....52 Production of manufactured ■ dairy products, 1938 119 - 56 - Item Item U.S. Dept. of agri cul tiire . Bureau of agricultural economics 161, 199-200,316 Agricultural outlook charts. Dairy products 49 Annual report 47 Consumption and prices of canned milk as related to the demand for fresh milk. Ill Dairy outlook for 1939 45 Dairy outlook for 1940.. . . . . . .51 Dairy products manufactured in factories 1937 120 Dairy products: the world war and the 1939 European. war 121 Dairy situation 49a Determining input-output relationships in milk production 144 Estimates of gross and net weights of "butter in various types of packages.. 82 Forces causing dairy farmers to make changes in their farm organizations in Barron county, Wis.. 132 Greater uses for dairy by- products ..126 Milk equivalent of produc- tion of manufactured dairy products by states 122 Probable effects of the Agricultural conserva- tion program on livestock production in the midwest dairy region. 18 Production, consumption of dairy products 315 Receipts of milk and cream at the New York market. . ..310 Shifts in the dairy industry. .52 Six years of marketing agreement s 234 State trade barriers 319 Stocks of evapo rated and con- densed milk in hands of wholesale grocers in 38 cities 123 U.S. Dept. of agriculture. Bureau of agricultural economics - Continued Survey of quality of selected brands of butter sold in one- pound cartons 114 Transportation of agricul-. _ tural products in the United States ..171 World production and inter^. national trade in butter and cheese ...117 U.S. Dept. of agriculture. Com- modity exchange administra- tion. Annual report.. ••••47 Impressions of trading in butter and eQg futures •••.85 Survey of butter futures 86 U.S. Dept. of agriculture. Bureau of dairy industry. Annual report ..47 approves milk ordinance, ••••230 New developments in the uses of manufactured dairy products ••••106 Publications relating to . the dairy industry 50 What dairying can contri- bute to the social and economic life of the South 37 U.S. Dept. of agriculture. Exten^ sion service. Low-cost milk program seeks wider outlets ••••208 U.S. Dept. of agriculture. Divi- sion of marketing and market- ing agreements. Amendment no. 1 to order regulating the handling . of milk in the New York area •• *259 Compilation of order no.34.,260 Compilation of statistical, material covering order no. 27 261 Economic statement concern-, ing the Providence, H. I., milk market • • .246 - 57 - I ten Item U.S. Dept. of agriculture. Divi- sion, of marketing and market- ing agreements T . Continued Order. . .making. effective the order. . . regulating ...milk in... New York. ....271 Order... suspending section cof milk order for Lowel 1- Lawrence , Mass. area] 278 Order. . .terminating certain provisions of order no. 27 279 Orders as amended, regula- ting the hand! ing of milk. . Cincinnati area. ...... .262 Dubuque area 263 Fort Wayne area 264 Greater Boston area.... 265 Kansas City, Mo., area. .266 La Porte County, Ind., area ......267 New York area .268 St. Louis area.. ....... .269 Toledo, Ohio, area 270 Orders regulating the hand- ling of milk. Chicago area ..272 Louisville area. 273 Omaha-Council 31uffs area .....274 Qjuad Cities area.. ... ..275 Sioux City area 276 Washington area 277 Statement concerning the Calumet, Indiana- Illinois milk market .226 Statement concerning the Louisville milk market. .. .252 Statement concerning the Sioux City milk market. .. .227 "Statement concerning the Washington milk market . . . . 253 U.S. Dept. of state. Trade agree- ments program "benefits the dairy industry 317 U.S. District court. Northern district of Illinois.. 222 U.S. Farm credit administration. Adjusting deliveries to class sales 169 "Challenge" - means just that.. 101 Contrasting problems of' "butter co-ops .115 Cooperative marketing of dairy products 62 Cooperative milk marketing in. Louisville and other near- ly cities 64 Dairy co-op leads the way...... 107 Pure milk "goes to town" via radio .58 Relative prices to producers. ..304 Selecting outlets for butter... 103 Surplus - stay away from our doorl.... 56 This is the plant that skim built ....66 T rucks change c r e am-marke t ing picture 109 Using your co-op creamery. .....104 Using your fluid milk co-op... ..63 U.S.- Public health service, standard milk ordinance.... .. ..230 U.S. Supreme court decisions 238, 241-242,280-281 U.S. Temporary national economic committee 25, 180, 188-189 U.S. Works progress administration. Marketing laws survey. Compa- rative charts of state statutes .".....323 U.S. Works projects administra- tion. New York City. Coopera- tive dairying..... 61 Vermont. ..2,99,138-140,314 Vermont. Agricultural college. Extension service.. Changes on a group of Vermont dairy farms... ...138 Milk production per cow and feed costs 139 - 58 - Item Item Vermont. Agricultural experiment "station. Studies in Vermont dairy farming. XI. Labor as a coat of production ......140 Vermont. Dept. of agriculture. Nineteenth biennial report. .... .314 Vial, £•£. ' Dairy outlook for 1940 51 Monthly index of per capita production of the principal manufactured dairy products. .124 Production and consumption of manufactured dairy. products. .125 Production, consumption of dairy products 315 Shifts in the dairy industry 52 Waite, W. C. Consumption of butter by Minneapolis families. With R.W. Cox 79 Waller, A.G. Production and price trends in the dairy industry and cost of producing milk in ' * New Jersey. With J.W. Carncross. ..7 Wall rich, M.M. Borderline milk ' and cream market problems 4 Washington, D. C 253, 277 Welden, W.C. 'Cooperative milk marketing in Louisville and other near- by cities. With T.G. Stitts...64 Organi z ing ' f lui d-mi Ik marke t ing cooperatives in the United States 65 This is the plant that skim built....; ;;!......... 66 Western States. 3 Weymouth, George. Shall the ' ' i Indiana^ ' milk control law be continued? 282 Whiting milk' company; .......... 242, 280 Whitney, Caroline. What price milk?. ...'.... . 305 Whitney memorial fund. 305 Whittier, E.O. Greater uses for dairy by-products. .126 ' Wichern,' Arthur. Single-trip con- tainers attract attention 209 Williamson, Paul. Costs. and re- turns from dairy cows on selected New York state farms. .153 Wilson, J.L. Problems in adopt- ing the milk cow. .52 Winkjor, J.G. Cooperative dairy bull associations. ............ ..72 Wisconsin cheese region. 81 dairy statistics .316 dairying ■ .39,54 directory of dairy manufac- turing plants. •.-.•. ..127 effect of agricultural conser- vation program on livestock. .18 forces causing farmers to make changes in Barron County 132 prices, stabilizing 128,306 single-trip milk containers.. ..209 trade agreements and dairying. .318 Wisconsin. Dept. of agriculture. ..316 •■• Directory of Wisconsin dairy - • • manufacturing plants 127 Wisconsin dairying 54 Wisconsin. University. College of agriculture. Extension service. R e dprocal trade agreements and Wisconsin dairying.. .318 Stabilizing dairy prices.... 306 What about stabilization of butter prices?.. ......128 Wisconsin crop and livestock • reporting service. Wisconsin agriculture...... .316 Wisconsin dairying ...54 Wise, W.S. Pennsylvania's milk • ' marketing problem ...283 Woodin, M.D. Distribution of * • dairy cattle in Chautauqua County, New York, 1937.. 73 •Wright, T.K. Profitable dairy management. With A.C. • • Baltzer 154 - 59 - ECONOMIC LIBRARY LISTS No. 1. State trade "barriers; selected references. March 1939; Revised, June 1940. No. 2. The frozen food industry; selected references, January 1937 to March 1939. April 1939. No. 3. High drafting in cotton spinning; selected references. April 1939. No. 4. Egg auctions; selected references. July 1939. No. 5. Acts administered hy Agricultural Marketing Service. October 1939. No. 6. Periodicals relating to shipping. October 1939. No. 7. Electrical properties of cotton; some references to the literature, 1931-date. November 1939. No. 8. Sea island cotton; selected references. November 1939. No. 9. Cotton picking machinery; a short list of references. March 1940. No. 10. The tomato iniustry in Puerto Rico and Cuba; a short list of refer- ences. June 1940. No. 11. The dairy industry in the United States; selected references on the economic aspects of the industry. July 1940. UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA 3 1262 08926 6562