't*t^' ' -H ^ c -t-> o •H O ^co m -H f^ O d o CL & S W o I- d >5T3 Uf +J 1 C •H Wl rH O fn +Ji Oh O tMl Ol txO ■HI a ml o O O O o "3 T5 Xi X3 73 o O O O lO O to O lO CV2 C\J rH iH l^ W to to rH CD O O) o (DO O O G tti 73 "O O fH O lO O lO t> rH LO CV rH to rH (D O O O O C (v3 73 73 73 o u S Eh o o o lo in •^ CD >H in c\j W rH rH to •H W rH cd t-, -P o O tM O "^ O O CM -^ CD (J) G O) (J) 00 <-{ rH CO . . . Sh CD o o o o © c: td 73 73 73 ''O O Sh o txO CT O CO O tn •H © o o oot~cvoo O O rHtOlOCO^l'CM to to to CV rH ■"^ O "^ CO o O d) <£> ^ yf o in to CM o to rH N -^ CV CV r-{ O O O O O O "^ O O O O O O CO Q) O O O C cd 73 73 O (-. 2 Eh o (U o 73 'o 73 o o ^ © a O cd Xt Q o © XI c u 73 rH 73 d o cd -P c: x: •H > Sh © o -(-> •H ^ o © s o a © £! cti s ^ ^ o ■H a o Q X CVcVCVtOCV rHCVtOCV O O CV o o to 00 rH CO CO -^ CV rH to r-i rH rH CV to -^ rH rH 73 bO © a ■P J2 ^. X! O k! a o Q CO. >: oo'-'oinio LOtoojrHCV Ol'O CD; 0) CI t CC| 4-> c to n3 O +^1 ft Q bJ3 O" O W S ft O 05 to to CD cd ^ o o o CD o O 03 o o o o o CD U Xi T3 73 O Xi U X5 o 73 M S-, O H S E-H s E-" g c •H Jh ^ +-5 o in LO O o o O LO o o in CD (h ft LO O M O) in O in w O in o in cv G) ^, to -1 .-H r— 1 OJ r-\ 1— 1 C\2 w s 3 !L| 45 r-i ^i' -* 'Cf ■^ CJ to rH to ■^ to ■P O ^. >> Oh r-i rH o o o o t> to o o o o in (h c c;3 o cd cu iH CD U) iH rH Xt >-l CD o >-" - 5 Fumigation Tests in Petri Dishes Although no odor could be detected from the compound, fumigation tests were made to check the possibility of fumigation having occurred in the Petri-dish tests. Unmeasured quantities of the dust were placed in the lids of Petri dishes in such a way that only the vapor could permeate the dish and come in contact with the larvae, which were confined with untreated foliage. The dishes were held for 48 hours at room temperature as in the previous tests. As no significant mortality occurred in tests with larvae of the melonworm, the southern beet webworra, and the Hawaiian beet webworm, it was concluded that no fumigating action occurred in the tests reported in table 1. but that the mortality was due to contact or stcmach-poison action. Screen-Cage Tests With the toxicity of phthalonitrile established by the preliminary tests, a study was made of the effectiveness of spray deposits on potted plants in cylindrical screen cages. For this purpose the compound was made up as a spray at concentrations of 8, 4, 2, and 1 pound per 100 gallons of water and each spray applied to two plants with a compressed-air spray gun. When the plants were dry, 15 larvae were confined on each plant by a cylindrical screen cage. The cages were examined at 2-day intervals for larval mortality and the feeding on the plants. The method by which a spray suspension is made may determine its ef- fectiveness as an insecticide. A spray suspension that can be applied with little run-off is essential for comparing various concentrations of spray. Obviously, if run-off is not prevented, an 8-100 spray may be no more effec- tive than a 2-100 spray properly made and applied. Suitable methods of preparation will vary with the insecticidal compound, the water used, and the foliage on which the spray is to be applied. Since some of the first sprays made up gave low toxicity as compared with the preliminary tests, several dispersing and wetting agents were tried to increase the effec- tiveness of the phthalonitrile. Of the various wetting agents tried, t.he most satisfactory was found to be saponin. The weighed portion of phthalonitrile was dissolved in 5 cc. of acetone and slowly poured, with agitation, into 95 cc. of water containing 0.12 percent (by weight) of saponin (equivalent to 1/8 pound of saponin per 100 gallons of water) . The phthalonitrile was recrystallized in the form of fine white needles, which remained well in suspension. This spray could be applied heavily to collards without run-off, but it was not ideal for pumpkin and squash, which wet more readily. A satisfactory spray was also made with bentonite, although with more difficulty owing to its sticky nature when wet. Best results were obtained by first wetting the bentonite with alcohol or acetone and then diluting gradually with the full amount of water. With the bentonite in suspension, an acetone solution of phthalonitrile was added with constant UBRARY STATE PLANT BOARD - 6 - agitation. The bentonite was always used at a 1-percent concentration in water. This spray was not always satisfactory on collards, but it worked well on pumpkin foliage. Fairly good results were also obtained with calcium caseinate, sodium monosulfonate of monobutyldiphenyl, and saponin alone without ace- tone. Each was ground to a thin paste with the insecticide and a little water and then gradually diluted with water to the desired concentration. Fish-oil soap and sodium oleyl sulfate made inferior suspensions, and some other wetting agents were entirely unsatisfactory. Spray suspensions were tested against five species of insects (table 2) . Phthalonitrile was effective on all species at a concentration as low as 4 pounds per 100 gallons. The melonworm was most susceptible, ccmplete control resulting from a 2-100 spraj''. Fair results were obtained v/ith this spray on the southern and Hawaiian beet webworms, but not on the imported cabbage worm or the southern armyworm. In general, phthalonitrile does not appear to be so effective as the standard insecticides when tested as a spray deposit. Actually the material is as effective at the higher concentrations, but it appears to become less effective with dilution. Since the compound is slowly volatile, it apparently cannot long maintain a lethal deposit when applied in such low concentrations. Plant-Tolerance Tests Early in this work an experiment was conducted to determine the tolerance of tender truck-crop plants to spray deposits of phthalonitrile. The spray was made at a concentration of 8 pounds of phthalonitrile and 8 pounds of bentonite per 100 gallons of water, as described under the cage tests. Small field plots containing from 4 to 20 plants each were sprayed with a hand sprayer and examined at intervals for symptoms of injury. The plants included bean, collards, squash, potato, tomato, beet, and Swiss chard. Weather conditions during the period were fair with no rainfall. For 12 days after the spray was applied the treated plants appeared to be unaffected. A second application was then made, and the plots were observed over an additional 12-day period. Since no visible differences could be found between the sprayed and unsprayed check plots, it was con- cluded that, under certain conditions at least, phthalonitrile may be safely applied to foliage. Field-Laboratory Tests The effect of exposure or weathering on spray deposits of phthalo- nitr.i.le was then studied by means of tests combining field and laboratory technique. An 8-8-100 spray with bentonite was applied with a knapsack sprayer to a field plot containing 10 to 12 plants. Collard plants were --i ?? a, o O c a o w x: & CO ■:i^ o o ^ <^ c ^ - 1 ts o3 t; -H 1 -d g Is 1 Th ^ ^c^ £f Is S£ 03 ^ "« in ^^ ^ w ■3^ o -< ° >>^ H . 1 W ' -(-> C^iS I'd I V) >> nj p -d ^4 a. to •H CO >> n3 i Q -ci u O O TT in o en 00 0^ CV CD CD CO t> CD G col 'o col ® -P 731 ^ I CiH cj CDl in in T:r lO t-. ffl (tj tH eg O • O • . S . O . . s "d tt3 o (ti o o fH o Cj o O O TJ fH O t, T3 fH T3 X! O 'O u -d T3 -O O O S H H S H 2 2 >3 (D +^l ■HI ■Hi CO ^\ cd s-l-d SIC\2 I to 00 nH CD (J^ 00 ^- ^T to rH to o ^ o o o (T> o O O lO CD O 00 lO o 0) O O CT5 to O CD to to O O to to to K) to to CD ^i< rH 00 00 (D O) CD ^ +J CO ■H bO ■H C -H C •H c; •H c -H c; -H c -H C -H C -H a -H a -H C -H CJ -H c o c o d • o a O C O C O CO +J O -H> o o +j o . • . -l->O+^O+->0O-+-' c ft c a 'd c a. o o o caco-ccaj^ cti cd © Pj X! T3 73 0(d0ro0OcdO) ca CO CQ CO CQ CO oacomc/icQScocQ c; o ■H' o o d d o CO o o CO cd T3 W) d o d (h Gj O •H ^ •H XI Cd tH XI o a ft O ^ 1 !! II \3\^ >3 (D m m S O ■ . Cd O O 'C3 (-< T3 TS O O 0) t- \f cv LD O O) O) CO 00 t- H| M ctil >5 t-lxs Ol I ft c en o •H W) Q nj •H| CD 0| O, G o +^l w (d O Ol t3 bO o d 0) c fl O wi ;:) o o -H r o o O +-> •HJ Ou rH I o e O • • • O O O LO o w CD O O O CD lO rH CD O CD O to K5 CV rH to nT CV -fj O W C5 O o r* rH cd s::: ft T3 0) cd o o Cd CG o s: c/J o LO cv to cj to lO O CD f> CD 00 lO ^ to t^ CV CO 00 00 CD CD W lO rH CD i-H CV ^ OJ ■-I CV CV •H C •H c •H C C ■H c •H a •H o d o c o c ■»-> o +J o hj o o a ft c: ft C ft t; o cd 0) cd o C/3 - 9 used in tests against the southern armyworm and pumpkin plants against the melonworm. Other plots were sprayed with lead arsenate or derris, plus bentonite, and others with bentonite alone. V^hen thoroughly dry, 3 plants in each plot were infested with nearly full grown larvae (10 per plant), which were confined by screen cages. At the same time samples of 6 leaves were taken at random from the remaining plants in each plot to be fed to larvae (5 per leaf) in Petri dishes in the laboratory. Similar samples of leaves were taken from the plants at 2-day intervals thereafter for 10 days and fed to larvae in the laboratory. Observations for insect mortality were made 2 and 4 days after the leaf samples were infested, and the amount of feeding was observed after 4 days (table 3). In the field-cage tests against the melonworm phthalonitrile was more effective than derris, the results being almost identical with those for the same spray in table 2, except that the derris was slightly less effective. Against the southern armyworm phthalonitrile was only slightly less effective than lead arsenate, the mortality being in general slightly lower than in table 2. Although these tests are similar to the laboratory screen-cage tests, the plants were more exposed to heavy dew and sunshine, two important factors in weathering. The field-laboratory tests of leaf samples revealed a character- istic of phthalonitrile that was not apparent in any of the other tests. In the tests on the southern armyworm 48 hours of weathering greatly reduced the toxicity of the deposit, and after 96 hours it was practically non- toxic. Against the melonworm the deposit was effective about 48 hours longer than against the southern armyworm. The results indicate that deposits of phthalonitrile may remain toxic only 3 to 5 days after applica- tion. Derris and lead arsenate deposits remained effective for 10 days. The increased mortality with lead arsenate after 8 and 10 days is not con- sidered significant. A greater number of samples might show less variation. Volatility appeared to be a likely cause of the loss in effectiveness of the phthalonitrile, because no extreme change in temperature or rainfall had occurred during the test period. To check on this possibility, glass slides were coated with the spray and exposed to the air in the laboratory. Examination under the microscope at daily intervals showed that the deposit gradually decreased, until on the fourth or fifth day it had disappeared. The period of volatilization would undoubtedly vary with the weight of the deposit and possibly with the wetting and emulsifying agents used. Tests on Termites Phthalonitrile was also tested as a soil treatment for the control of termites (Re ticuli te rme s sp.). The method described by Hockenyos (2) was used. A weighed quantity of the insecticide, according to the concen- tration desired, and 40 grams of sanc'y soil were ground in a mortar until thoroughly mixed and then poured into a 150-cc. beaker containing about 12 CO. of water and a little tissue paper. After the dry soil had absorbed the water, 30 adults or large nymphs of the worker caste were placed in the beaker, which was held for 3 days in a cabinet at approximately 80° F. Xi 1 4-> >> •H s ^ t4 03 a (D C -d u u © C! Xi •H -p n 03 03 a -c O (0 >! 03 -P U •H Q <— 1 CO 03 c ■P 3 !- — i O ^ 2 O bO OIT! © n3 I © +-> X5 I © Cm Ife. 03 ■>* m 31 031 JlTDI 13 CO © c3 Ife- c3 'I' I'D © © +-> © c^ CO to CD O O to CV ^ ,-1 M CV -2 ^ o o o \3 x! t; O O to K5 O to (i) 0) t> W '^ ^- 1 -fj f- col a © >:• © ■P 031 p Cm| Til u 031 © w- Q- >^ -Pi •H| (0 P M ?>5 G 03 rol © -H Tl o f- 1 t- o:c\j © IH XI H -HI >5 -HI CO o3 W >5 (-. -O fa I 03 W 03 COI O CO to to to CD t3 to CV -H '-I 03 © o o o to o to o o o en in to to G) O to to to to Uj O 00 CV rH O • © S • • 03 O T3 f-« o O J-. X3 O O XS T3 O C\J -^ (X) CD O O O O O O O o o o o o o 03 ■ • • ■ ■ S o o o o o 5-< 13 XJ X! 73 ^ o 2 O t^ o t> o o W w CD I- J 00 CO o o to t> t- 0) . . . o o o o 03 t! T3 t3 o t- to o o o o t~ {> to o o o o o n a • • u. o o O "C 73 O C