oe ee OF TH ——S UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS i ~ London County Council. CT rc etme remem Sree ee ce eee re ROYAL COMMISSION ON THE PORT OF LONDON, 1900. STATEMENT OF EVIDENCE BY THE CLERK OF THE LONDON COUNTY COUNCIL, Tue County Hatt, Spring Garpens, 8.W.; 8rd Dece: aber, 1900, Jas. Trvs@eeb. axp Sow. Pastors: Scrvotk Lane,.Cannon Sirecr, H.C. oe lt oe ee Se London County Council. LIBRARY OF THE UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS ROYAL COMMISSION ON THE PORT OF LONDON, 1900. STATEMENT OF EVIDENCE BY THE CLERK OF THE LONDON COUNTY COUNCIL. Tue County Hatt, Sprinc Garpens, 8.W.., 37d December, 1900. Jas. Truscott aND Son, Printers, SurroLK Lane, CANNON STREET, EC. [52894-5650 CONTENTS. Summary of events Dock accommodation provided Shipping of the Port Position of the trade of London ... Expenditure and revenue of London Port authorities Government of 7 Port of London System of government of the other parts of the United Kingdom Foreign ports ... TABLES ACCOMPANYING THE STATEMENT OF EVIDENCE (See list at end of Statement). PAGES. 1—10 11—12 13—17 18—21 22—26 27—28 29—30 31 Le £ . = STATEMENT OF EVIDENCE. Mr. Grorce Lavrenor Gomme, clerk of the London County Council, appointed on the 30th October, 1900, and formerly Statistical Officer of the Council since 1891. He prepared for the Rivers Committee of the Council returns to enable that Committee to report upon the following resolution of the Council (of the 24th March, 1896)— “That it being in the best interest of London to improve its shipping by improved and cheaper dock accommodation, it be referred to the Rivers Committee to report upon the whole subject.” He has prepared, for the purposes of this Commission, evidence on behalf of the Council, which as the central local authority of London, it is desirous of submitting as bearing upon the importance of the port and docks as matters of public concern. He has studied this subject for some years as a matter of vast public importance, and has at the request of the Council visited foreign and English ports, in order to understand the question from as many points of view as possible. Summary of events showing original municipal control and final private control of the port. The first important point which the Council desires to direct attention to in connection with the Port of London is that formerly it was under municipal control. The manner in which municipal control has in the past been exercised in the port, and the various events which have occurred by which that municipal control has almost entirely disappeared, are of importance in the present enquiry. For this purpose the following facts have been obtained from original authorities. Early in municipal history the condition and administration of the port was always considered a municipal service and many instances occur of works being undertaken by the municipalites of the country in connection with their ports. In London from the earliest times the control of the river Thames seems to have been generally regarded as the duty of the mayor, commonalty, and citizens of the City of London. Thus, in a case of disputed jurisdiction over the Thames in 14 Edward IIL. (1321), judgment was given (Liber Custumarum, Vol. II., Part I., p. 408) “quod aqua Thamisia pertinet ad civitatem Londoniarum, a Londoniis usque ad mare” (that the water of the Thames belongs to the City of Lon- don, from London to the sea.) Howel (Londinopolis, 1657, pp. 15-16) refers to this judgment, giving a slightly different text; and to another similar judgment in 1 Richard If. (1877), when, the sheriffs and citizens of London being called in question for their jurisdiction exercised on the Thames, it was found “ quod nullus habeat aliquid juris in Thamisia usque ad novum gurgi- tem nisi cives Londonens,” (that nobody has any jurisdiction on the Thames down to the new “wear” [gurges=a wear, Liber Albus, Glossary, p. 389], except the citizens of London). A great amount of information as to the complaints and disputes is to be found in the series of records known as the Remembrancia, preserved among 967545 2 the archives of the City of London. An analytical mdex to these, for the period 1579-1664, was published by the City Corporation in 1878, and a few examples from this will illustrate the position. In 1580 we find, in a letter from the Lords of the Council to the Lord Mayor, the Government recognising the jurisdiction of the City over the Thames. The précis of the letter in Remembrancia runs— “The river Thames, by reason of the number of weirs between the bridge (London-bridge) and Windsor had become choked and almost unnavigable. They requested him, as conservator of the river, to send the water bailiff or some officer to them, with an account of the number of weirs existing from London-bridge to Staines, how many there had been in ancient times, and what number had increased within the past seven years; how many were fit to remain, and to take order for the removal of the others”’ (pp. 499-500). Another letter of the same year, from the Lord Mayor to the Lord Treasurer, complained— “That, contrary to the rights and charters of the City appoimting the Lord Mayor conservator of the river Thames within certain bounds, which jurisdiction had been quietly enjoyed by the City for many years without interruption, during which time the river had been kept in a good state, of late years the Right Hon. Lord Seymour, Lord Admiral of England, supposing the jurisdiction to belong to his office, had entered into the same and interrupted the franchise and authority of the City. Upon his decease, his successors had, by their officers, continued the interruption. ‘The mayor and citizens, considering the great estate of the said Lords, had not pursued their right, ag in law and justice they might and ought to have done. Since the time of the said interruption, the river, eastwards from London bridge, had become so decayed, that ships or vessels which, within 20 or 40 years past, might have come up to the pool against St. Katharine’s, could not pass at low water without danger between London and Greenwich. The channel being choked, the lands adjoining were overflowed, to the danger of breaches, and the destruc- tion of the fry and brood of fish, whereby the City lacked the good store of fish which used to be taken in the river. In consideration whereof, and because the City could not be kept out of utter decay and ruin without present amendment of the river, he requested his good offices and advice with Her Majesty and the Lord High Admiral, that the City might be restored to their ancient rights. If any doubts existed as to the City’s right, the judges, after hearing evidence, should determine to whom the right belonged, that steps might be taken for the conservation of the river” (pp. 500-501.) In the same year another letter from the Lord Mayor to the Lord Treasurer stated that— “‘ Ships which formerly came to St. Katharine’s could not now come to Blackwall. Tiltboats and wherries were scarcely able to pass from London to Greenwich at low water. The princes and Parliament had in time past thought it best to commit the conservation of the river within certain bounds to the City. Fearing that in time to come the City might be charged with neglect, he requested that Her Majesty might be pleased to command her learned judges to declare the law in this case, and to whom the jurisdiction belonged’ (pp. 501-502.) It will be noticed that in these two letters from the Lord Mayor to the Lord Treasurer, the Government is said to have granted the jurisdiction over the river “within certain bounds” to the City Corporation. If such definite control had been granted none of the authorities seem to mention it. All start with James I.’s charter of 1605, and from this date, at all events, the position is clear. This charter is dated. 20th August, 1605, and a translation given in Birch’s Historical Charters, 1887, runs, in part, as follows (pp. 132-138.)— “Whereas . . . the mayor and commonalty and citizens of our City of London, time out of mind, have had, exercised, and ought, and have accustomed themselves to have and exercise the office of bailiff, and conservation of the water of Thames . . . from the bridge e = 3 of the town of Staines .. . towards the east, unto London-bridge, and from thence to a certain place called Kendall, otherwise Yenland, otherwise Yenleet, towards the sea, and east, and in Medway, and in the Port of London aforesaid, and upon whatsoever bank, and upon every shore, and upon every wharf of the same water of Thames, within the limits and bounds aforesaid, and in, upon, and about all and every of them .. . we have granted, and . . . do grant to the said mayor and commonalty and citizens, and their successors, that they may exercise and execute the said office of bailiff and conservation of the waters of Thames... .” Whatever the authority under which the City Corporation exercised jurisdiction over the river prior to this stage, there would seem to be no doubt, in the first place, that that jurisdiction was not definitely theirs by statutory right, and in the second place, that it was recognised as belonging to them, not only popularly but by legal opinion. The powers and duties of the Lord Mayor as conservator of the Thames are concisely set out in Norton’s Commentaries of the City of London (1829, pp. 506-507) as follows— “he lord mayor has a general authority to remove wears, kiddles, obstructions, and nuisances, and to seize unlawful nets and fish caught unlawfully or out of season. “ For the preservation of the waters of the fishery and of the naviga- tion, various Acts of Parliament have from time to time passed, and various ordinances of the Common Council regulating what nets are to be used and how, and condemning, under penalties and forfeiture, any injurious traffic on the river; over which offences the lord mayor has jurisdiction, either by action of debt in his mayor’s court or by inquisitions taken in his court of conservancy. A number of the mem- bers of the court of Common Council form an annual committee called the Navigation Committee, to superintend the general state of the navigation. “The Court of Conservancy is a most ancient court of record, held before the lord mayor eight times every year, in the four counties of Middlesex, Kent, Essex and Surrey successively, by prescription and by virtue of the king’s commission, which is granted by the king on his accession, to the lord mayor for the time being. A jury is summoned of residents of those counties, and their jurisdiction may be said to be confined to the inquiry and redress of common nuisances in the river. ‘The commissions which have been from time to time issued from the period of Henry III.’s reign, direct the mayor to inquire into, and authorize him to hear and determine, offences in unlawful fishing. In modern times the court has been held with great regularity, and with very beneficial results; the jurisdiction has been chiefly exercised, like the wardmote leet courts, for purposes of inquisition and presentment ; and the redress of nuisances, when pointed out by such presentment, has been of late years sought by indictment in a superior court. “For the purpose of enforcing his authority as conservator of the Thames, the Lord Mayor appoints an officer called the water-bailiff, who is called the sub-conservator, and whose office over the river is of the same nature as that of the chief constable appointed by the county sheriff over the hundred. His duties, which are ministerial and partly regulated by statute, are generally to watch over the river for the detection of, and to inform against, nuisances ; to summon the inquest jury, and to attend them on their view in fulfilment of the charge given them at the conservacy court; to attend the corporation on their aquatic processions; to receive the instructions of the navigation com- mittee of the common council; to licence and inspect fishing-nets; to seize forfeitures for the purpose of condemnation; and to obey the instructions of the civic authorities, in removing obstructions in the navigation of the river.” To what extent the Lord Mayor, having the above-mentioned powers my and duties, was able or willing, through his deputy and conservancy courts, to cope with the growing traffic in the port, is shown in several contemporary * 4 annals. In 1746, Roger Griffiths, water bailiff (7.e. the Lord Mayor’s deputy for conservancy purposes), wrote “An essay to prove that the jurisdiction and conservancy of the river of Thames, &c., is committed to the Lord Mayor, &c.,’ in which, after going into raptures over the navigation of the lower river, he says (p. 15)— | “ And so truly sensible has the City of London always been of the great importance of the navigation of this river that its chief magistrate and conservator thereof annually holds several courts of conservacy for its preservation, at a very considerable yearly expense to the City; and as a further proof thereof, it is not above four years since they laid out several hundred pefinds in widening the channel and taking away gravel from several shallow places of the river west- wards, which at that time greatly obstructed its navigation, and this last without any other obligation on their parts than their zeal for the public good.” After thus praising the City’s administration, he goes on (pp. 15-16)— “But I am afraid even all this, or any other expence, how great soever, will little avail to the continuing and preserving this navigation open and free as it ought to be, without a more uniform and regular method of navigating and loading the western great barges is more duly formed and established than what is practised at present or has been of late years especially. “In order to explain which, and to act consistent with the duty lowe to my office as well as the publick, I shall here just point out some few of those disadvantages which either now attend, or are but too frequently practised, to the detriment of the navigation west- wards. And the first that I shall mention and which is but too frequently committed by those persons who are entrusted with the navigating of these barges, especially down the river, is this, that such persons, whether through vitiousness, negligence, or wilfulness (best known to themselves) turn their vessels and run aground so across the channel of the river as to obstruct all other barges passing or repassing the same; and this, if I have not been misinformed, has been, and is often done through envy, ill-will or other clandestine views, to others coming down the river at the same time, and so interrupt each other’s passage that not only the owners of the loading often sustain inconveniences by such delays, but the navigation is thereby much impaired by so many vessels lying in the way, or foul of each other, and thereby stopping or diverting the due course of the river, and turning its current, which naturally removes large quantities of sand and gravel from off the shallows into the channel, to its prejudice, both in respect to its dimensions, as well as depth of water; which the more it is expanded, must naturally be the less deep, and consequently the more incapable of bearing the greater burthens.” With regard to the lower river, a very vivid account of the state of the navigation is given by James Sharp in a report he made to the City Corporation in 1773 on a proposed canal from Waltham Abbey to Moorfields. He says (p. 2)— ‘Our port, once the noblest, perhaps, in the whole world, is greatly injured by many causes. Tideway navigations, according to the nature of things, choak up in time and become shallow, by the perpetual washing down of floods from the rivers above; and from the City of London such a quantity of soil and rubbish is continually carried into it by the sewers as is, of itself, prodigious, and such as can never be prevented; but above all, such is the great contraction of the port, from Westminster to Limehouse, by embankments, by encroachments, and the ill-judged manner of forming our causeways, from the stairs to low water mark, that the Port of London is much upon the decline, and the inconveniences of it multiply very fast, insomuch that it is thought not less than thirty thousand pounds worth of cables are consumed in the winter months by the rapidity of the tides and land floods, there being no eddy waters for ships and other vessels to lie in; it is no uncommon thing to see whole ™, 5 tiers of ships forced from their moorings one upon another, and seldom a tide passes without accidents by vessels running foul of others in their passage both upwards and downwards, tearing and breaking away everything before them; and almost every winter for many years past has afforded melancholy scenes of vessels being wrecked and entirely lost, even in our very port. « Thus we stand with regard to our port, and our river navigation is in as bad a condition; neither can it ever be made much better, for locks and dams are impediments, which like the tideway will in time accumulate and render it broad and shallow by reducing the natural fall or descent into flat ground so as to form a step as it were at every lock. Now, though I am averse to embankments in the tideway, sure I am that embankments and contraction is the only method that can be taken to preserve a stream navigation, but even this will not make a river good for passage upwards. ‘The labour of passing against the stream can never be taken away, nor tle meandering length shortened. A river stream is the natural drain of a country and ill formed for navigation.” The Corporation had, under the Act 22 Charles If., cap. 11, constructed the channel of Bridewell Dock from the Thames to Holborn-bridge, paid for it out of the coal dues, and were authorised to charge reasonable rates for the use of the navigation and quays. In 1732 this channel had become “a grievous and dangerous nuisance” (6 Geo. II., cap. 22), and the Cor- poration were authorised to fill up the channel and appropriate the ground in fee simple. It will thus be seen that though its ancient powers extended to dredging, construction of docks and quays, and nearly all administrative matters, the Corporation did not meet the requirements of the case. The report of the Committee of West India Merchants, December, 1793, in reference to schemes for dock improvements at various outports, says (App. to report of Port of London Committee, 1796, p. 406 of Reports of Commttees, 1793-1802 )— “The metropolis of Great Britain alone had, in these material respects, remained torpid; its improvements checked or suspended, and its abuses gradually gaining head.” Other references to the inefficiency of the Port at this time are to be found on pp. 270 and 271 of the same volume— « A oreat and general complaint is made of inattention to a proper conservation of the depth of the river.” ee, The river has lost from four to five feet depth of water at many of the stations or tiers of shipping, and that shortly the channel of the river must be choked and rendered still less suitable to navigation, if measures of prevention are not adopted.” e The crowded state of the river, the want of room for mooring ships, and for the constant access to them by craft . No remedy seems to have been applied to this evil, though so repeatedly urged, and so fully admitted.” La The quays are not of sufficient extent, from which delays and many extraordinary expenses occur, and obstructions to the due collection of the revenue.” Although Parliamentary power was obtained in 1696 to construct a wet dock at Rotherhithe, this dock was practically out of use until it was adopted for the Greenland trade. Practically in 1796 the Port of London had not a single wet dock, while Liverpool and Hull, obtaining statutory powers in 1709 and 1774 respectively, “had improved navigation or constructed commodious docks, with warehouses and other commercial facilities.” (Clifford, Private Bill Legislation, Vol. II., p. 630.) In Hull the Corporation had assisted to form the dock company, and had subscribed thereto. In Glasgow, again, the municipality in 1758 had obtained an Act to improve the navigation of the Clyde, and had been conspicuous in their attempts to provide better facilities for shipping nearly a century before. So matters were drifting, the municipality of London letting go their hold upon this important service. In 1796 private enterprise began to be exerted. Early in that year a committee of merchants petitioued the House of 6. Commons for permission to bring in a bill for the making of wet docks at Wapping. ‘Their proposal, as described by the select committee, appointed later in the same year “to enquire into the best mode of providing sufficient accommodation for the increased trade and shipping of the Port of London,” was as follows (pp. 276-277) — “To purchase eighty acres in Wapping . . . and there to excavate and form docks of thirty-nine acres area of water, capable of containing three hundred and fifty ships; and one other for the accommodation of lighters, of about two acres, with a course for the main docks into the river at Hermitage Dock.” Two entrances were intended for shipping, one communicating directly with the Thames at Bell Dock, the other by a canal, navigable for ships of 350 tons, running eastward 2% miles, reaching the river at Blackwall. Their petition was referred to a committee, upon whose report the House ordered— “That leave be given to bring in a bill for making wet docks, basins, cuts, and other works” with “a navigable canal from Blackwall to the said docks in Wapping.” On 18th February, 1796, the bill was read a first time. Thereupon numerous petitions were entered against it. Among them was a petition from the City Corporation, in which they claimed that ‘“‘ ever careful of the rights and welfare of their fellow citizens” they had “formed a plan for giving increased accommodation to vessels, without creating a new corpora- tion or expensive establishments, and without imposing burdens on trade” (51 Commons Journal, 431, quoted in Clifford’s Private Bill Legislation, u1., 632). In the City plan it was proposed to excavate a dock of 102 acres in the isthmus of the Isle of Dogs capable of containing above 400 ships, and another at Rotherhithe of the same size. Further, they proposed to accommodate such trade remaining in the river by extending the frontage of the existing legal quays for lighters to le alongside, to construct thereon spacious ware- houses, and to open avenues to facilitate conveyance to every part of the rnetropohis. So great was the outcry against the making of the docks according to the merchants’ plan that the second reading of the Bill was postponed till a second committee of 1796 had reported. To this committee were referred, in addition to all the petitions against the merchants’ bill, various plans for improving the accommodation in the Port of London, including among them those of the merchants and of the City Corporation. So important was the subject then considered that such members as Mr. Pitt, Mr. Fox and Mr. Sheridan were appointed to serve upon the Committee. With regard to the merchant’s plan for docks at Wapping, the com- mittee reported favourably, relymg on the favourable reports of the Commissioners of Customs and Trinity House, to whom the plans had been referred. ‘The Commissioners of Customs reported (Reports of Convmittees, 1798-1802, p. 349)— “We submit ... that the situation pointed out for the wet docks and canal, for the purpose proposed, is, as far as we are capable of judging, preferable to any other of which we have had cognizance.” Trinity House reported (Reports of Committees, 1793-1802, p. 349)— “The Committee are therefore decidedly of opinion that the vacant space of ground in Wapping . . . under all circumstances, is the most fit situation for wet docks and legal quays, for the accom- modation of trade and security of revenue in the Port of London. The Committee beg leave to report farther that it is their opinion a cut from Blackwall to the dock in Wapping would also be of great benefit to the trade of this port, as it would free shipping and merchandise from all risk (so far as it extends) from the tides or shipping, which all parts of the river are liable to, and facilitate the passage into the dock.” The committee’s report on the City’s scheme (Reports of Committees, 1793- 1802, p. 277) was not favourable— “The plan appears worthy of the magnificent and commercial spirit of the City Corporation; but meets with objection on part of the Corporation of the Trinity House in their report, because it is deficient in providing for the fundamental convenience to 7 trade by contiguity to the metropolis and ready intercourse of those concerned, and from the extent of lighterage endangering property and revenue. The danger to both, whilst valuable articles of high duty are detained in lighters, has already been observed by the report of the Commissioners of Customs—' How far close or decked lighters are an adequate or desirable remedy, has, from the evidence on safety and on port charges, been before observed upon by your Committee. The Brethren of the Trinity House further object to the encroachments on the Thames, by projection of the quays, as highly detrimental to the conservation and navigation of the river.’ ” The Committee did not, however, definitely recommend one plan, merely submitting their observations on the various schemes, with the evidence and appendix, “in order that the House may be better and more fully enabled to decide on the premises.” ‘Their report was dated May 13th, 1796, and the closing of the session on May 19th left no time for legislation. In the course of the next three years the merchants continued unsuccessfully their efforts to obtain authority to build docks at Wapping. The City Corporation modified their scheme. ‘They had made a friendly arrangement with some West India merchants, and were promoting a joint bill by which the City should have power to make a canal across the Isle of Dogs and improve the legal quays, while a West India Dock Com- pany, to be created, should make docks in the Isle of Dogs. In 1799 these two plans, together with a third of “ merchants, traders and wholesale dealers of the City of London and Borough of Southwark, and others interested in the trade and commerce of the river Thames and the improvement of the Port of London, for newly constructing London bridge, and for enabling ships of 500 tons to le between that and Black- friars-bridge,”’ were referred to a Select Committee. The Committee reported (Reports of Committees, 1793-1802, p. 444)— “Your Committee are desirous of stating, in the first place, their unanimous opinion that it is indispensably necessary for the accom- modation of the trade of the Port of London that some plan should be forthwith adopted for the improvement of the port. The great increase of the trade for some years; the prospect of a still further increase; the inconvenience, and even danger, to which ships are exposed in navigating the river, and the delay in loading and unload- ing their cargoes, from the crowded state of the shipping; the advantages which several of the outports have obtained from the establishment of docks, cannot fail to impress on the House the truth of this opinion. Your Committee regret that though this subject has been now under consideration for several years, no measure should yet have been taken for remedying evils so universally felt and acknowledged by the commercial part of the metropolis; and they trust that a decision will take place, without further delay, in favour of some one of the plans that have been proposed.” This passage interprets almost exactly the present state of things. I shall in my evidence deal with the “ great increase of trade,” “ the prospect of still further increase,” “the inconvenience to shipping,” “the delays at the port,” “ the advantages which several outports have obtained by the establishment of docks.” : With regard to the two plans for wet docks, the Committee reported (p. 445)— ; “Your Committee have no hesitation in delivering it as their opinion that it is desirable that docks should be established in both of these situations (Wapping and Isle of Dogs), and that they would be in no respect incompatible with each other. But considering how important it 1s that something should be done without further delay, your Committee have unanimously resolved . . . to recommend the immediate adoption of the plan of the Isle of Dogs.” They preferred this plan “from the very great advantage of providing for large ships in a manner which would enable them to avoid the danger and delay of the circuitous passage.” Following on this report the City bill became law on 12th July, 1799. This is the first great dock bill. 8 By this Act the Common Council were empowered to make a navigable canal across the Isle of Dogs (section 1); to build piers at Blackwall and Limehouse-hole, to facilitate the entrances into the canal (section 2) ; to remove and alter the present mooring chains, and place others, under the inspection and approbation of Trinity House (section 37). By section 38 the West India Dock Company is incorporated, and ordered (by section 42) to pay five per cent. as interest or dividends on monies subscribed until the docks and works shall be completed, and afterwards interest or dividends not exceeding 10 per cent. per annum. The whole of this Act is deserving of careful consideration as showing the position of the municipal authority at this date. It will be seen from these facts that the City Corporation as the municipal authority of London at this date took a prominent part in the construction of docks and improvement of the port. Although they allowed the West India merchants’ scheme for docks to become a part of their Act and the company to be incorporated, yet many considerable powers connected with the administration of the port were conferred upon the Corporation, and even in connection with the docks themselves it is noteworthy that by section 43 of the Act, it was provided that of 21 directors of the company 4 should be aldermen of the City and 4 common councillors. Another feature of this Act is that the Government agreed to advance out of the consolidated fund on the credit of the rates and duties granted by the Act a sum of £72,000. This grant led up to a series of later grants, which it is important to set forth. The mformation is obtained from the House of Commons Journal. On the 16th February, 1802, the City Corporation petitioned Parliament for a further sum of £50,000 to carry on the canal works, all the £72,000 originally advanced having been expended. ‘The reason advanced for the inadequacy of the original grant was that in many cases it had been necessary to purchase the whole of properties of which only a part was required. By the subsequent sale of these superfluous parts it was hoped that it would be possible to repay much of the £50,000. The speedy grant of the money was important, as it would obviate much extra expense, the Isle of Dogs at that time being drained by two engines, one for the canal and one for the docks in course of construction. The docks were to be opened in July, and the whole of the drainage (and the opening of the docks would probably increase it) would devolve on the canal—hence the necessity for expedition, ‘The Act 42 Geo. III., cap. 49, was the outcome of this petition (7th May, 1802.). On 7th February, 1803, the Corporation again petitioned Parliament for more money, suggesting that an additional toll should be laid on craft frequenting the port. No specific mention of the canal was made in the petition. It implies that the money was to be devoted to the general amelioration of the port, which would, of course, include the canal works. The Act 43 Geo. III., cap. 124 (18th July, 1803), advancing £100,000 for repair of mooring-chains and general improvement of port, and making additional rates on vessels, was the result of this petition. On Ist March, 1805, the Corporation again petitioned the House for more money, saying that the canal works were in a very forward state but more capital was needed. The result was 45 Geo. III., cap. 63 (27th June, 1805), advancing a further sum of £60,000. On 30th June, 1807, the Corporation again asked the House for more money,and 47 Geo. III., sess. 2, cap. 31 (1st August, 1807), advancing £45,000 more, was the result. The total sum advanced by the Government under these several Acts was apparently £327,000, and it is important to note that a part of this was, under the 1803 Act, devoted to the repair of mooring-chains and the general improvement of the port. Thus at this date, the government of the country, the municipal authority of the City, and private enterprise were conjointly concerned in a far-reaching scheme for the improvement and government of the port. After this important epoch in the history of dock administration of London, the active interest of the municipal authority gradually died out. 9 The story is best told in Mr. Clifford’s words in his History of Private Bill Legislation (ii., 653-4). “In 1829, as the canal was no longer required for navigation, the Government and Corporation agreed to sell it to the West India Dock Company, whose works it adjoined. At that time none of the advances made by the Treasury had been repaid; the tonnage rates on which these loans were secured had been found insufficient to do more than meet interest and expenses. To end as quickly as possible a bad busi- ness, Parliament allowed the Treasury to sacrifice, after 1829, all claim for interest; the tonnage rates, for a term of twenty-one years, were devoted towards repayment of principal; and the canal was handed over to the Dock Company, freed from all obligation to maintain it as a channel for vessels. Here, therefore, after thirty years, the Corporation closed their statutory connection with the dock and kindred enterprises of the century.” In 1836 the attention of Parliament was again directed to the condition of the Port, and a Select Committee of the House of Commons was appointed to enquire into the state of the Port of London. This Committee reported (Rep. p. ii.)— “That it appears to this Committee that the navigation of the river Thames in the Port of London has for a great length of time been sub- jected to serious and increasing obstructions, by which the maritime approach to the metropolis has been impeded, the shipping exposed to injury and needless detention, and that frequent accidents have occurred, several of which were attended with the loss of human life. “That this Committee are of opinion that the various conflicting jurisdictions and claims of the Admiralty, the Trinity House, and the Corporation of the City of London, over the river Thames below the bridges, have had a most injurious effect upon the interests of navigation, and that it is desirable that they should be consolidated and vested in some one responsible body, and that means should be found to provide for the removal of shoals and obstructions in the bed of the river.” Here, again, the present condition of things is interpreted. I shall give evidence upon “ the conflicting jurisdictions,” and as to the insufficiency of the means “ provided for the removal of shoals and obstructions in the bed of the river.’ ‘The recommendation that the conflicting jurisdictions and claims over the river should be vested in one responsible authority was never carried out. Differences between the Crown and Corporation as to rights of Crown over the bed and shore of the Thames were being fought out. The Crown contended tbat it had a property in the bed and shores and a right to revenue accruing from leases of land between high and low water. All this benefit had accrued to the City, which claimed property in right of conservancy. ‘I'he Crown did not dispute the right of the City to con- servancy, but held that the title to bed and shores was independent thereof. Lengthy and costly litigation followed. In 1846 a conference _ be- tween the Crown and the City arranged that a bill should be promoted to constitute a conservancy board consisting of 15 members, 10 to be nominated by the Corporation and 5 by the Crown. ‘The bill was introduced in 1847, but did not pass owing to the lateness of the session. Ata second conference, held in 1856, the City recognized the hitherto disputed rights of the Crown, and an agreement was come to by which two-thirds of the revenue from the bed and soil was to go toa conservancy board to be constituted and one-third to the Crown ; litigation was to cease; all necessary conservancy funds were to come ‘from dues levied upon the Port and other sources of revenue of the Corporation; to the new board the Corporation was to appoint seven members, the Admiralty two, the Board of Trade one, and Trinity House two. The preamble to the Thames Conservancy Act, 1857, recites that ‘the lastage and ballastage and the office of lastage and ballastage of all vessels coming into, lying i, or going out of the river Thames. .. . and the supplying of ballast to all such vessels. . . . have been by certain ancient grants... vested in the master, wardens, ‘and assistants of the Corporation of Tr inity House of Deptford Strond”’; that Trinity House “have, from time to time, as occasion required, dug, raised, and taken up such gravel, sand, soil, out of and from the river Thames as were fit and proper for the ballasting of 10 vessels’; that “there are in the river Thames certain shoals, shelves and banks which materially impede the navigation of the said river, but the materials whereof not being fit and proper for the ballasting of vessels the same have not been dug, raised and taken up by the said ” Trinity House; that “it is expedient for the better and more safe navigation of vessels up and down the river Thames that such shoals, shelves and banks as aforesaid, and others of the like nature should be removed and taken away, and the said”’ Trinity House “are willing to undertake the removal of such shoals, shelves and banks in manner herein- after mentioned and provided for”; that ‘“‘the public enjoy certain rights and privileges in and over the river Thames for the navigation and use thereof”; that “ many encroachments have been made on the shores and banks of the river Thames, and it is desirable and expedient that further powers should be given for their removal and prevention”; that, “in con- sequence of the great increase of steam navigation it has become necessary vo provide safe and convenient places for embarking and disembarking steam-boat passengers, and that the same should be put under proper restrictions and regulations” ; that “it is expedient for these beneficial objects that the whole regulation of the river Thames should be under one uniform management and supervision of a permanent body of conservators, having all powers necessary for that purpose.” The constitution of the Board under the Act gave a majority to the City Corporation, consisting as it did of the Lord Mayor, two Aldermen and four common councilmen of the City, the deputy master of Trinity House, two nominees of the Lord High Admiral, one each of the Privy Council and Trinity House. This majority was destroyed in 1864, when six additional conservators (two elected by shipowners, one by owners of passenger steamers, two by owners of lighters and steam tugs, one by dock- owners and wharfingers) were ordered to be elected. In 1866, 1893 and 1894 the constitution of the Board was again altered, but the majority of the City Corporation was never restored. At this point it is important to recall the condition of affairs in 1898. The London County Council had decided to ask Parliament to reform the constitution of the Thames Conservancy Board so as to bring it more into conformity with existing circumstances. The City Corporation no longer represented London, but only one square mile of London. The Council did not succeed in its efforts, beyond obtaining a provision for tem- porary representation and the instruction of the House that the Conservancy should itself bring m a bill to reform its constitution. This was done in 1894... The bill, as introduced, proposed that the repre-. sentation of the County Council and the Corporation should be 8 members out of a total of 383; the bill was amended to give a representation of 12 out of 38, and the constitution of the Thames Conservancy was based upon the representation of the county authorities administering the area of the Thames basin. : This legislation introduces into the government of the port a new authority, partly municipal, partly commercial, and partly administrative ; but its powers are limited and its finance is unsatisfactory. It is neither municipal nor private. In the meantime, in 1872, municipal administration in the Thames had again been introduced, thus mterposing a new authority. Under the Public Health Act of that year the City Corporation became the sanitary authority for the Port of London, the expenses being defrayed out of the City estates. Since the surrender of municipal terest in the docks the companies have had an almost unfettered hand. Act after Act hag been passed by Parliament without any criticism by a public authority, and practically without any object but that of commercial gain. By these Acts the dock companies obtained very considerable powers in various directions—powers which placed the companies in the position of a public authority without the ese fio of a public authority. These powers I give a synopsis of in Nable I. The port has grown up into its present unsatisfactory position at the nands, first of monopolist dock companies, then of dock companies instituted for the purpose of competition, then of certain Government departments and specially organised Conservancy bodies, which haye been granted administrative powers in order to correct a few of the evils that were gradually arising, but without a comprehensive grasp of the entire situation. 11 Dock Accommodation Provided. I present a table (2) showing the area of the docks of London from their inception to the present day-— In 1802 there was created a dockage area of i+} sO2¢ ACTES. By 1811 it had grown to Bs A Sy ios ty; By 1821 3 “ ae eis Atel amigt By 1831 a pe or sg Pa eames From 1831 to 1851 there was practically no development, but between 1851 and 1861 considerable development took place— By 1861 it had grown to = ... 9902 acres. >» Lome A ee i TAL wee >» Loam “ eax Le Daye hee »» Loam be 5 epse Mars ae Since 1886 there has been little or no development. Assuming that acreage roughly measures accommodation, and I think this would be so, there is a most significant deduction to be drawn from this table when con- sidered with the expansion of the trade during the same period. The value of the periodical increase in dockage can best be ascertained by comparison with the corresponding growth of shipping and the character of the shipping. The following figures supply the principal data for this comparison— Nigar Number of Tonnage | Acreage of F ships entered.| entered. docks. 1802 14,577 2,085,351 622 1831 24,235 3,388,430 223? 1841 29,367 4,347,580 2255 1851 31,349 5,293,177 2287 1861 28,175 6,299,211 3902 1871 22,417 6,848,642 471+ 1881 *46,568 |*10,001,526 557% 1891 45,555 |*12,636,634 6295 1897 *48,171 |*15,187,261 631 1899 23,711 | 14,682,971 631 * Altered basis adopted in returns. Between 1802 and 1831 the activity in supplying dock accommodation shows that the dock authorities were endeavouring (with success) to meet the requirements. It was nearly quadrupled during this period, whereas shipping had only increased by 62 per cent. in tonnage and 66 per cent. in number of ships. During the period of stagnation between 1831 and 1861 shipping had nearly doubled in tonnage (86 per cent.), the number of ships showing only an increase of 16 per cent. over the year 1831, and an actual decrease in numbers during the ten years from 1851 to 1861. Dockage was then increased by 75 per cent., and again it seemed as if the dock authorities were determined to meet the requirements. Since 1861 the tonnage of shipping has gone on increasing in very considerable degrees, while the number of ships has proportionately decreased, showing unmistakeably the tendency towards larger ships. The increase in the dockage has not been commensurate with the requirements during this period. Up to 1886 increase took place, the construction of the Millwall Docks and the Royal Albert Dock, additions to the West India Docks and the Surrey Commercial Docks, and the construction of the Tilbury Docks being the principal works. But shipping had again outstripped the dockage. It had grown from 6,299,211 in 1861 to 11,597,756 tonnage in 1886, an increase of 85 per cent. (altered basis). Since 1886 it has grown from 11,597,756 to 15,187,261 in 1897, that is over 30 per cent., but nothing has been done during this period to increase the dock accommodation. In 1802, when the dock system was first intstituted, the whole of the shipping was then accommodated in the river. It amounted to 14,577 ships, with a tonnage of 2,085,351, and was considered so intoler- 12 able an impediment to navigation and so injurious to shipping as to induce Parliament to grant powers to private companies to construct docks. In 1899 the total shipping was 23,711 ships, with a tonnage of 14,682,971. The exact apportionment of this shipping between the docks and the river is not obtainable. It appears, however, from the particulars already handed in to the Commission by the Chairman of the Board of Customs, that of the foreign trade alone there is accommodated in the river 5,670 vessels of a tonnage of 2,664,964, a considerably larger tonnage than the whole tonnage which entered the Port in 1799. In addition to this the river has to accom- modate the bulk of the coasting trade, which on a basis which excludes a great number of vessels trading in the river, was in 1899 12,843 vessels and 5,488,378 tonnage. There is, at any rate, now accommodated in the river, about four times as much tonnage as was held in 1802 to constitute a serious indictment against the authorities entrusted with the control of the Port. I must qualify these conclusions by noting that the quayage of the river has no doubt extended for the smaller vessels. But Iam not able to state to what extent. The information can probably be obtained from the Thames Conservancy, who have to grant licences for wharves, and I would suggest that the information would be useful to the Commission. Still with this information to hand I do not think that the general conclusion as to the failure of the dock authorities to meet requirements can be inyali- dated. It may be, of course, that the dock system is not the proper system to extend for the new developments in shipping. But even so, there is no authority considering, or having the power to consider, what other system, if any, should take the place of dockage or should supplement dockage; and until the docks are placed under a properly constituted authority, no such consideration can be given to the vital questions proved by the figures I have given to be now requiring the most serious and immediate consideration. 18 Shipping of the Port. I next turn to another aspect of the matter. London’s growth and condition must start from its trade. Its shipping has long been of the greatest importance in relation to the shipping of the United Kingdom and of the civilised world. If accommodation has been inadequate, it may affect the trade of the port to such an extent as to constitute a menace to the prosperity of London. It may even do more, for the trade lost to London may not be transferred to a British port, and if it is transferred to a foreign port, the matter becomes one of national importance. I propose, therefore, to ascertain, as far as possible, what are the facts to assist in solving this problem. The first point is to ascertain the course of the volume of trade in the Port of London. I begin with the period when the system of docks was first introduced into London, namely, at the beginning of this century, when the river without docks was found totally inadequate to accommodate the trade of the port, and the merchants of London had raised so strong an outery against the want of accommodation. The information is not easily available, as the early returns were not based upon the same principle as the modern ones. But much information can be given by reference to extraneous reports and other sources. In all cases I have indicated the source from which the figures are obtained. I put in two tables (3 and 4) showing the shipping of the Port of London in each year of the century for which the information is available. The first table shows the shipping entered the port, the second shows the shipping cleared. At the end of the last century the question of accommodation and the position of the Port was the subject of protracted enquiries. At the end of this century the question calls again for serious consideration. Whatever may be the relative conditions of the Port at the end of the last and of the present century respectively, there can be no doubt of the greatly increased magnitude of the subject. It will be useful to summarise the figures for the years 1799 and 1899 in a comparative form. First, as regards the foreign and colonial shipping— Foreign. Number of vessels. Tonnage. Entered. | Cleared. Total. Entered. | Cleared. Total. In 1799 eat Be 3,414 2,518 5,932 673,473 521,311 | 1,194,784 In 1899 nS ay 10,868 6,831 17,699 | 9,244,593 | 6,042,050 | 15,286,643 Proportion of 1899) more than|more than} 3 times. nearly nearly nearly to 1799 3 times. | 24 times. 14 times. | 12 times. | 13 times. Secondly, as regards the coasting shipping— Coasting. Number of vessels. Tonnage. Entered. | Cleared. | Total. Entered. | Cleared. | Total. Len Wg .- es 11,163 4,913 16,076 | 1,411,878 491,300 | 1,903,178 In 1899 ee iF 12,843 9,818 22,661 | 5,438,378 | 2,208,683 | 7,647,061 Proportion of 1899} Slightly | Twiceas | Nearly Nearly | 43 times. | More than to 1799 increased. many 15 times. | 4 times. 4 times. 14 And thirdly, as regards the total foreign and coasting shipping together— Foreign and coasting shipping. Number of vessels. Tonnage. Entered. Cleared. Total. Entered. Cleared. Total. In 1799 . nF 14,577 7,431 22,008 | 2,085,351 | 1,012,611 3,097,962 In 1899 veg ck 23,711 16,649 40,360 |14,682,971 | 8,250,733 | 22,933,704 Proportion of 1899 to} More than} Morethan| Nearly | More than| Morethan| Nearly 1799 1} times twice twice 7 times 8 times | 73 times This increased magnitude of the problem, as it is now presented for consideration, is a measure of its importance from almost every point of view. Whatever is done in the future it cannot be left to the chance results of temporary measures of co-operation between private capitalists and public authority as was the case in the past. It must be settled upon principles which shall give permanence and. settlement in administration and wide and comprehensive powers of development, not only for meeting actual conditions, but of anticipating the probable conditions of the near future. The steady and remarkable continuity in the growth of the trade of London is the most apparent feature disclosed by these tables. The increase in the tonnage has on an average been as follows— Foreign. Coasting. Total, Entered | Cleared.| Total. |Entered.| Cleared.) Total. |Entered.| Cleared.| Total, Average annual increase per cent. from 1799 to 1899...) 2°55 | 2°48 | 2°58 | 1:36 | 1°51 | 1:40 | 1:97 | 2:12 | 2:02 Further dividing the figures according to quinquennial periods and com- paring the figures for each period the result is as follows— Increase in tonnage in each quinquennial period on the preceding period Periods, Foreign. Coasting. Total. Entered.|Cleared. | Total, {Entered.|Cleared.| Total. {Entered. |Cleared.| Total. p.cent./p. cent.|p. cent.{p.cen t./p. cent.|p. cont cent.|p. cent.|p. cent. 1825-29 on 1820-24 65) S289 1 2654 27-3 1830-84 ,, 1825-29 ...(— 62 2:4 |\— 2-4 1835-39 ,, 1880-34, (1.44203 19-9 | 20:2 1840-44 ,, 1835-39 wef lB BH 103 | 148 2°6 7k 1845-49 ,, 1840-44 ...] 32:1 | 23-7] 283] 82 15°6 1850-54 ,, 1845-49... (a) | (a) | (@) 6 (a) 1855-59 ,, 1850-54 ...| (a) | (a) | (a) 68 (a) 1860-64 ,, 1855-59 | 20°07 .14-0 | A7-8 52 8:4 6:1 Bae Sf 118 eo 1865-69 ,, 1860-64 ...| 163 ) 146 | 15:7 -—-6:0 6:0 |— 3:0 oo | 113 pi 1870-74 ,, 1865-69 _...| 153 | 293 | 202] (a) | (a) | (a) | (a) | (@) | @ 1875-79 , 1870-74 _—...| 21-9 | 21:8 | 21:8] (a) | (a) | (a) | (a) | (a) | (a) 1880-84 ,, 1875-79 soot 5°61 224 177 1408) 213'3| 13°83 aeeeo 18:7 1 ae 1885-89 ,, 1880-84 veel, 1404] 17°64) 156 P1424 222°4 | 16:3 Baas | 19°01 168 1890-94 ,, 1885-89 eH OSA e1S'2 a 72) 145 9-1 90.4 13°6 110% 1895-99 ,, 1890-94 ...| 161] 152] 1571 @ | @|@iI@/|@ i @ (a) Comparable figures are not available for these periods. For so jong a period of time as 100 years this annual increase is very remarkable, and is not to be equalled by any other port in the world. It shows above all things the natural capabilities of the Port of London. No amount of artificial aid would create such results. But onthe other hand, their very magnitude suggests that these natural capabilities may be encroached upon insensibly, and so be gradually undermined and almost destroyed. Artificial aid in the shape of adequate dockage, wharfage, &c., 15 is necessary to be able to put the natural capabilities to their utmost possible use, and the question therefore is, does the present system produce the utmost possible use? Itis impossible to suggest asa mere matter of statistics when this increase is going to stop. Ifit continues, or rather if it tends to continue, then the position of the Port becomes one of the most pressing questions of the day. If it decreases or remains stationary, then the question will arise whether the natural volume of trade to London has been reached or whether the want of development of London facilities has not hindered trade, and, further, whether the nation or only the Port of London suffers from this. To answer some of these questions it is necessary to analyse the tables in various directions. I will first turn to the relative volume and growth of the import and export trade—of the shipping entered and the shipping cleared with cargoes. It will be seen that while the tonnage entered from foreign countries rises from 673,473 in 1799 to 9,244,593 in 1899, or nearly 14 times as much, the tonnage cleared rises from 521,311 tons to 6,042,050 tons, or only nearly 12 times as much, the tonnage of shipping entered being now more than 50 per cent. in excess of the tonnage cleared. The question arises whether the inconveniences of the port help towards this result. All things being equal, shipping would clear from the port of entry as much as possible. In 1799 it largely did so in London. It had fallen back considerably in 1858, and has never recovered itself, though it is noticeable that after 1867 the growth has been continuous though com- paratively not very great. Next it is noticeable that the increase in the number of ships is not con-- tinuous with the increase in tonnage. ‘This, of course, is due to the substi- tution of steam for sailing vessels, and the consequent increase in the size of the vessels. I put in a table (§) showing the number, tonnage and average tonnage per ship in both sailing and steam vessels for all the years for which steam and sailing vessels are separately given in the official returns—namely, since 1841. This gives a complete history of this important change, It is difficult owmg to the different methods of reckoning adopted in the official returns to make a certain comparison for the whole series of ears. As far as the figures go, they show that from 1841 to 1872 the tonnage of the sailing vessels rose from an average of 142 to an average of 208. On the new basis adopted in 1873 the average fell from 122 in 1873 to 71 in 1897. | As regards the steam vessels, the deduction can be made with more certainty. Both the number and the tonnage of these have gone steadily up. In 1841, it worked out at an average of 238 ; in 1897, at an average of 686; in 1899 (on a basis which excludes certain of the smaller steam vessels), at anaverageof 731. This figure has to be considered with reference to the figure of maximum tonnage of ships which are moored in the river, which has already been stated in evidence before the Commission as 600 tons. (Q. 15.) I turn next from these figures relating to London only to the registered shipping of the United Kingdom. I put in tables (6 and 7) giving the classification from year to year of the steam and sailing vessels, accord- ing to tonnage, engaged in the foreign trade, registered under the Merchant Shipping Act as belonging to the ports of the United Kingdom. This table illustrates the alteration in the character of the ships that are being built in later years. It will first be seen that since 1890 the number of British steamers engaged in the foreign trade has not materially increased. As to the classification of the vessels, it will be seen that the number of steam vessels under 1,600 tons is steadily decreasing ; vessels of from 1,600 to 2,000 tons show a decrease in 1899 for the. first time, whilst vessels of from 2,000 tons upwards have been steadily increas- ing since 1860. In 1860 there were only five steam vessels of 2,000 tons and upwards, whilst in 1899 there were 1,108 vessels. It is further significant that the steam vessels above 4,000 tons, which in 1894 numbered 19 and in 1898, 66, rose in 1899 to 98—a most significant increase in the number of the largest vessels. 16 As regards sailing vessels in the foreign trade, the most striking fact is the gradual reduction of the number in all classes. Having seen the great increase in the number of the larger steam vessels, it will be useful to see, if possible, to which of the ports of the kingdom these belong, as indicated by the port of registry. This is dealt with in the next table (8). It shows the number and proportion of the whole kingdom of the vessels of each class belonging to London and the ports of Liverpool, Glasgow and Greenock, among which are distributed the largest class of vessels. ‘Taking the vessels above 3,000 tons tonnage, the figures are most significant of London’s inferiority. The figures are— Number and proportion registered as belouging to United Kingdom. Classification of tonnage. London. Liverpool. Glasgow. Greenock. Number. | No. | percent. | No. | percent. | No. | percent. | No. | per cent. tons. tons. 3,000 and under 3,500... 149 27 \> 182-4200 4994030 | 43 | 228186 5) 3°36 3500... 4.) 4,000.2) 077 124: 1559 925 1999-50 | 14 | Bisas Sasa s ae 4,000 and over ... me 101 7 6:93 | 64 | 63°40 4, 3°96 5 495 Total’ 2; 3 327 46 | 1407 |149 | 45°57 | 61 | 18°65 16 4°89 Of the 327 vessels above 3,000 tons it will be seen that while Liverpool has 149 or 45°57 per cent. and Glasgow 61 or 18°65 per cent., London has only 46 or 14:97 per cent. This classification 1s according to net tonnage. ‘his question of the size of vessels may be further considered in view of what is the position of the ships of other nationalities. I put in a table (9) giving a list of the vessels (according to Lloyd's Register) above 7,000 tons gross, showing when built, port of registry and dimensions. In the table of English vessels the first thing of importance is the large number that have been built in the last three years. Of the 85 British vessels in the list, the number built in each year is as follows— Vaan Number of vessels. 1881 3 18838 1 1884 2 1889 2 1891 1 1893 4, 18940... ag ae a 4 LBOD ihe a Te bes, 4, 1896 e 3) 1897 6 1898 ie 1899 20 1900 17 85 This shows to what extent the later development of vessels in the direction of the greater size is proceeding. The port of registry of these 85 vessels is as follows— Port of registry. Number of vessels. Barrow Belfast Glasgow Greenock . Liverpool ... London Southampton West Hartlepool | el Kok Go AT Co oy ibys Though the port of registry does not mean that the trading of a vessel is confined to, or even principally concerned with, that particular port, yet taken with all other facts it cannot but be regarded as of some significance that even as a port of registry, London, with its great trade, holds such an inferior position in respect of the larger class of vessels, whereas in the smaller vessels its position as a port of registry is undoubted, as will be seen from table (8). It will be further seen from the table that foreign countries show a considerable competition in the direction of larger vessels. The number of German ships over 7,000 tons gross is 34, and the number of French, 7. I put in a further table (10) showing the classification of steam vessels of all nationalities (according to Lloyd’s Reqister). It will be seen that the number of German vessels between 7,000 and 10,000 gross tonnage is 15 against 63 British, and over 10,000 tons 19 against 22 British. Germany is thus building large vessels out of all proportion to its commercial fleet, compared with what Great Britain is building in connection with its enormous fleet of merchant vessels. In view of these facts I suggest, at all events, that the incapacity of Britain’s greatest port to accommodate the larger vessels may become a serious factor in deciding the national position. It must be remembered that the shipping of London is about one-fifth of the rest of all the ports of the country put together. Accommodation at Liverpool, Glasgow and other ports will not make up for want of accommodation at London. It will only partly do so. If London, therefore, cannot properly accom- modate the largest ships, not only its own trade but the trade of the kingdom is seriously menaced. 18 Position of the Trade of London. I next turn to the position of the trade of the port asfar as an analysis of the tables from a general statistical point of view can interpret the facts. I think the relation which the trade of the port bears to the trade of the whole kingdom is the most useful form of consideration of the subject. This I have taken from various points of view, as far as the information available in the official returns admits, and I put in a series of tables show- ing the results (11-17). Table 11 shows London’s proportion of the total shipping entered, the actual figures for London and the rest of the United Kingdom being given. Taking first shipping of the country, both foreign and coastwise, it: shows that London has failed to hold its own. London’s proportion of the totaltonnage of shipping entered has beenin— 1856 nee a ig 23°4 per cent. 1860 a if Sid 22°6 $3 1880 a a a 20°2 3 1897 ke : 22°8 * When divided between foreign and coastwise shipping the figures are more significant. In the same years they have been— Foreign. Coastwise. 1856 as Sbllaper cent.ina.< 19:2 per cent. 1860 ae, DOA “A ons 18°6 as 1880 fi. o Daeg ys as 16°4 r 1897 ba ido : a 19-4 $ so that while the coasting trade (that is smaller vessels and for produce required principally for London home markets) has remained about the same during these forty years, the foreign trade. has fallen 5 per cent. Table 12 deals in the same way with the shipping cleared. It will be seen that in the number of vessels cleared there is an increase in London’s proportion from 7:3 per cent. in 1856 to 9:4 per cent. in 1897, while in the tonnage there has been an increase from 10:1 to 11°6 per cent. An analysis of these figures, however, reveals an important fact, viz., that this increase in the total is entirely due to the coasting trade. The coasting trade of London has increased in number of vessels from 5°8 per cent. to 8°5 per cent. and in tonnage from 6°4 per cent. to 7°4 per cent., but in the foreign trade there is a decrease in the proportion, viz. :—in the number of vessels from 12°6 per cent. to 12°3 per cent., and in tonnage from 15°9 to 14°9 per cent. The two next tables (18 and 14) take the consideration of the question of decrease in London’s proportion of the foreign shipping of the country a step further. Table 13 shows London’s proportion of the shipping entered from each of the chief foreign countries and British possessions in 1861, 1871, 1881, 1891 and 1899. As regards the tonnage of shipping from foreign countries it will be seen that the proportion is a steadily decreasing one from 20°7 per cent. in 1861 to 16:2 in 1899. Examining into these figures further by dividing the countries into groups, the result is perhaps more significant. The groups and the corresponding figures are as follows— Shipping entered from foreign countries and British possessions. Groups. London’s proportion of the total of the United Kingdom. 1861. | 1g71. | 1881. | 1891. | 1899. Per cent. | Per cent.| Per cent.| Per cent.|.Per cent. North Europe ... at oi aa oe Beet 19-0 18:2 17:2 14-7 South Europe ... nee ay Ae fa Magee | 16:8 12°8 15°6 10:1 Toletucape ete ee | igs | 173 | 169 | 139 Asia 74:9 844 62°7 78:0 89-4 America se bes ar oth a Foreign possessions sis wi rf a5 | sie" 20:0 12:2 14:2 15°8 British possessions : | | Total foreign countries and eee possessions ays Bee Lg It will be seen from this to what extent London is losing its share of the import trade from the Continent, that is to a large extent in materials for manufacture and of export to the rest of the world. There is an increase in the shipping from British possessions in the course of the same period; trade, that is, for the most part required by the population of the United Kingdom. The total result, however, is a steady decreasing figure for London’s proportion from 24 per cent. in 1861 to 19°3 per cent. in 1899. Considering the table (14) of London’s proportion of the shipping cleared to foreign countries and British possessions in the same way, it will be seen that as regards foreign countries the figure for London’s proportion is also a decreasing figure from 15°9 per cent. in 1861 to 13°4 per cent. in 1899, the figure for 1899 being, however, slightly higher than the figure for 1891. Dividing the foreign countries into the same groups as in the case of the shipping entered, the result is as follows— Shipping cleared to foreign countries and British possessions. Groups. London’s proportion of the total of the United Kingdom. 1861. 1871. | 1881. | 1891. | 1899. .\Per cent.|Per cent.|Per cent.|Per cent. North Europe ... - - ay ” L7°7 15:3 16°6 15°5 South Europe ... i he’ ys Us 74: 63 BM) d1 Total Europe ... a Bb vases ; 16:0 13°5 142 13:3. Asia it 31°9 America 13-1 13°9 Foreign possessions 44, 15°5 British possessions 26°3 22°4 Total foreign countries and ata 152 145 possessions London’s proportion of the shipping cleared to the Continent shows a steady decrease from 1773 per cent. in 1861 to 13°3 in 1899, and is principally responsible for the decrease in London’s proportion of the total shipping cleared to foreign countries. London’s proportion of the shipping cleared to British possessions does not follow the same course as the proportion of shipping entered. From 1861 to 1881 the figure increased from 25°7 per cent. to 27°3 per cent. ; in 1891 it had fallen to 26°3 per cent., and in 1899 to only 22°4 per cent. The figure for London’s proportion of the total shipping cleared to foreign countries and British possessions is a steadily decreasing figure, from 18:1 per cent. in 1861 to 14°5 per cent. in 1899. Turning next to London’s proportion of the trade as indicated by value, the relative position of London is perhaps more decidedly illustrated (tables 15 and 16). The tendency to decrease in the value of imports (for the shorter period for which the information is available) is undoubted. London’s proportion, which, in 1872, was 35 per cent., and in 1886 had risen to 36°6 per cent., was, for the last four years for the first time less than 34 per cent. It is, however, in the table of proportion of value of exports that the most significant decrease is shown. London’s proportion of the export of both home and foreign produce has materially declined since 1882 (the first year for which the information is available) from 32:1 to 26°7 per cent., while London’s proportion of foreign and colonial export trade in the same period has fallen from 61:2 per cent. to 53:0 per cent., the decrease being especially marked in the last five years as follows— tte ae a os 59°8 EOUD 2. Fe a cad 58°6 BIO. 5 « rae i+ aa 56°7 ed 1... ty ee te 54°7 OO) s. athe rh BS 53°7 oOo x. aS ee sis 53°90 20 Thus the conclusions which have been drawn from the figures as to London’s relative proportion of the shipping are confirmed by these figures as to values. In these figures the question of alteration in values does not of course affect the figures, because we are dealing with proportions only. A further section of the trade not included in either of the foregoing tables is that known as the transhipment trade. This is apart from the export of foreign and colonial merchandise which has been dealt with in the last table and which has shown such a marked decrease in London’s proportion. The figures for the transhipment trade are shown in five Tables, 17 A, B, ©, D, E. These tables require some explanation as to the division into two sections, namely, “imported for transhipment,” and “exported for tran- shipment,” it being of course understood that the total “imported” and “ exported”’ so far as the whole kingdom is concerned must always be the same. The difference between these figures for London and the rest of the kingdom arises from the fact that these goods are sometimes imported at: one port, say Southampton, and exported at another, say London. The difference in the percentages indicate to what extent this is done as far as London is concerned. Table 174 deals with the transhipment of wines and spirits. London’s proportion it will be seen has gone down from 90:3 per cent. in 1853 to 38°5 per cent. in 1899, and though there has been a recovery in particular years the total result is a certain tendency downwards. Table 178 deals with the transhipment of tea, and in this article London holds its own, the rest of the country taking only about 5 per cent. Table 1%c deals with the transhipment of tobaccos and cigars, and the falling off in London’s position is here most marked. From 91:8 per cent. in 1853 it has fallen to 35°6 per cent. i 1898 and to 17°6 per cent. in 1899. Table 17D gives the value of all other articles recorded in the official returns as being transhipped, and here it will be seen that though London’s position was bettered from 1871 to 1886, namely from 24°9 per cent. to 47°3 per cent., it has since fallen off to 27:2 per cent. in 1899, the lowest proportion of all since 1886. The total value of the transhipment trade is only given for the years 1896, 1897, 1898, and 1899, as set out in Table 178, and it will be seen that in the year 1899, London has very much fallen off. As the trade of London has thus been shown to be decreasing in pro- portion to the trade of the United Kingdom it is of importance to note what ports have been increasing during the same period. I put in a table (18) showing the proportion which the shipping of certain ports of the kingdom bears to the shipping of the whole kingdom for the same period as far as the information is available. From these tables it will be seen that the channel ports of Southampton, Dover, Newhaven and Harwich have secured a very considerable proportion of the kingdom’s shipping for the last 30 years. It is almost certain that this has been, to a great extent, at-the expense of London, and that the enterprise and expenditure on the docks of these places has enabled them to take away trade which, had the Port of London been brought up to its proper accommodation, would have come to London. This is not, however, the whole of this important matter.’ It 1s well known that these ports have all been equipped by the railway companies, and in this respect it is necessary to bear in mind the conclusion of the Joint Select Committee of 1872 on Railway Companies’ Amalgamation, which dealt with this important subject— “It is possible . . . that a railway company, by acquiring both a port and the railways leading to it, may obtain control over the whole of a certain description of traffic by sea as well as by land. It is possible, for instance, that if a great amalgamation were to take place between the North Eastern, the Great Northern and the Midland, the united company might obtain possession of the Tyne, the Wear and the Tees, as the North Hastern have of Hartlepool, and in that case they could, and probably would, discourage the carriage of coals by sea to London and other ports in England. There is, therefore, a danger in this respect which well deserves the attention of Parliament 21 and cannot be considered sufficiently guarded against by the Standing Order (151) of the House of Commons, which provides that no railway company shall acquire any harbour, steam vessel, &c., unless the com- mittee on the bill report that such restriction ought not to be enforced, with the reasons and facts upon which their opinion is founded ” (p. xix.). “There is real and effective competition between railways and the traffic by sea, especially in the carriage of heavy goods, and this com- petition is likely to continue, unless Parliament should give public harbours into the hands of the railway companies ” (p. xxix.). “ Hiffectual competition by sea exists, and ought to be guarded, by preventing railway companies from obtaining control over public harbours ”’ (p. 1.). Therefore it comes to this: that the railway companies of the south and east of England have been allowed to do in these channel ports what has not been accomplished for London owing to the want of properly con- stituted authority having control of the matter. It is quite true that the rise of these ports, if itis to some extent a loss to London, is not necessarily a loss to the kingdom. But there are important economical considerations which should be taken count of. The addition of the railway rates to the cost of shipment may affect the price of commodities compared with the price if they had been landed directly in the Port of London, which is the natural port for these commodities. Here is evidence, I think, of the way in which the natural advantages of London have been eaten into by the neglect of development in artificial dockage, &c. (see above pp. 11-12). Even this is not all, for the railway companies in order to attract trade to these ports, and therefore to their lines for carriage to its destination, have neglected the carriage of the home produce as witnessed by the voluminous evidence given before the Agricultural Commission particularly by the farmers of Kent. I am aware this touches upon a branch of economics not free from difficulties, but it is a matter not to be over- looked by this commission. The suggestion that the Port of London uses these channel ports as feeders overlooks the fact that the money which has been spent there and which must earn its dividends out of the charges imposed upon the goods shipped to these ports might have been spent upon the Port of London to the better advantage of the community. While London has been hesitating about connecting Tilbury more directly with London and improving the dock system to the required extent, the necessities of the port have been met by railway companies creating extra docks at distances ranging from 50 to 80 miles of London. If London docks had been in the hands of the railway companies they would not have built the channel docks. It will therefore be seen that other ports have succeeded in obtaining large percentages of the shipping of the kingdom, and it is also a fact that at almost all these ports the dock accommodation and conveniences have been almost created and at all events very considerably extended during the past 20 or 30 years. The question of population in regard to trade is more important in the case of London than in other places. The enormous development of London as a population centre is quite abnormal I put in a table (19) showing London’s proportion of the population of the United Kingdom (including, with London, the area immediately round London under the jurisdiction of the Commissioners of Metropolitan Police). It will be seen in 1801 London’s proportion was 7 per cent., in 1856 it had risen to 103 per cent., in 1886 to over 14 per cent., while in 1696 we find it is more than 15} percent. of the population of the whole kingdom. This enormous population needs larger imports than any other aggregate of population in the world. It compels a large amount of imports to come to London, whatever may be the difficulties of that trade arising from lack of accommodation. When this fact is considered in connection with the growth of the import shipping, that growth, so far as it depends upon dock facilities, will be found not to have been so considerable as it appears. This increase in proportion of population has to be borne in mind in considering the position of the trade of London and the proportion which it bears to the trade of the whole country. The proportion of population is now more than half as much again what the proportion was in 1856, while the preceding tables show that as regards trade the proportion is in nearly all respects less, and in some cases considerably so. 22 Expenditure and Revenue. It is very important to get from the various authorities a statement of the condition of their finances in connection with the Port of London at the present moment. The revenue accounts of all the authorities having control over the Port and Docks of London are not available. Those I have been able to analyse are the dock companies, Trinity House (as regards pilotage), Thames Conservancy, and the City of London Corporation (as Port Sanitary Authority), and I put in table showing the results (Tables 20 A—K). Beyond these there are various administrative expenses in the departments which have contro] in the Thames, and in connection with docks held by railway companies, the wharfingers, barge-owners, and other charging authorities which cannot be particularised. ‘The Board of Trade and other Government departments do not specify the expenditure under administrative heads, but only in general totals, from which it is impossible to determine what expenditure relating to the Port of London is incurred by these bodies, or how such expenditure is met. The total expenditure upon the docks and Port of London (maintenance works and services) reached, according to the available data, in the year 1899, the very considerable total of £1,888,875. It is obvious that this total must be increased by the expenditure of other bodies which I have not been able to ascertain, but it is not possible with present information to give even an approximate estimate of the remaining expenditure. The ascertained total expenditure in 1899 was incurred by the following authorities and bodies— £ Dock companies ... ig ei i, is ... 1,644,999 Trinity House and Pilotage _... oe = . 145,716 Thames Conservancy Board... o & ay, 90,768 Port Sanitary Authority 7,392 The purposes of this expenditure are not ascertainable to the extent which is necessary for a complete survey of the subject, as the accounts of the dock companies and of other bodies are not drawn up with this purpose in view. With the information available, the expenditure on works and services may be divided in the following manner— £ Dock, warehouse and service expenses ‘& wan 1,236,068 General expenses of the dock companies (manage- ment, rents, rates, taxes, &c.) ee, a oe 4.08,936 Pilotage ... fs tod ie she = 5 143,526 Pilot cutters 4 ine Ae ae a a 2,390 Locks, weirs, tow-paths, and foreshore a is 6,798 Piers ny - ig vel Sat = ae 10,599 Dredging... ee ue oh e 3 z ve 27,238 Mooring ... x. an ae sae - ve 5,926 Wreckage a es ae ae a oes ok Harbour expenses sch re ne ‘- bie 7,605 River purification if: oe 1E a 2,113 General expenses of Thames Conservancy (manage- ment and working) ... we. pct - ie 22,226 Port sanitary expenses ... ce: ie Z 34 7,392 £1,888,875 As to how far this expenditure is properly divided among the several branches of service it is not possible to speak with certainty, but it is abundantly clear that it does not meet all the requirements of the port. The Thames Conservancy has many times before Parliament, and before this Commission, explained that its expenditure is not controlled by the necessities of the services it administers, but by the amount of yearly revenue it receives, and I am not sure that the services administered by the Trinity House Corporation are not similarly controlled. 23 The total revenue of the limited number of authorities for which information is obtainable was in the year 1899, as follows— £ Dock Companies... a. aa nde sae eG Al Ealiy- Trinity House and Pilotage “at a a ni 146,096 Thames Conservancy... ae Lee he ed 100,568 Port Sanitary Authority oh ae an Pr. 351 £2.,558,317 This revenue has nearly all been raised by means of charges upon shipping and goods—charges which of course ultimately fall upon the consumers of goods. The significance of this fact cannot be exaggerated, as upon it depends to a great extent the prosperity of the port. In the first place, the sum of £793,562 is levied as tonnage dues and other charges upon shipping entering the port and docks. £ Thames Conservancy ... BY Ac ae hy 55,729 Dock Companies rhe ba i Ps w- (a) 591,930 Pilotage ... Sy oa! of cas ae sie ov 145,908 £793,562 Secondly, there are the charges on goods made by the dock companies for landing, warehousing, &c., which amounted to £1,578,949, and there is also a small amount charged on shipping by the Port Sanitary Authority for disinfection, &c., amounting to £89. Putting all the figures for 1899 together, it appears that the following is the total amount of the charges upon shipping and goods in the port of London which ultimately fall upon the consumer as taxation of the goods brought to the port. £ Dock Companies me ee +e ae en 2.170.879 Pilotage ... rer 4. ree ae e 145,903 Thames Conservancy ac Pe ee ~~ iy 55,729 Port Sanitary Authority ee ae Ee aes 89 £2,.372,600 These charges are in excess of the expenditure on works and services by £483,725, which is the amount reserved for payment of interest on capital. Interest on capital was paid to the following extent— £ Dock Companies ... ey ke oe Be aye O40, 7,7 (F Thames Conservancy a ie Be? San 3,000 £651,770 (a) This is partly estimated, as the Millwall Dock Company do not separate the charges on shipping from those on goods. 24 Besides the charges on goods and shipping there was revenue derived from other sources, as follows— £ Charges by dock companies for various services, and rents rae oe ae aa a. oe 140,423 Various charges and other revenue of Thames Con- servancy not affecting shipping ... ee 0 44,839 Interest on investments by Trinity House ... 35 193 Charges, fees, &c, of the Port Sanitary Authority ... 262 £185,177 If we take the total value of the goods entering the port in the year 1899 (£164,105,695), this taxation and charge represents 1:45 per cent. upon the value—a not inconsiderable tax. But when it is considered that the charges fall upon different classes of goods at different ratios, the position may be very serious. ‘Tonnage dues are paid upon the registered tonnage of the ships whatever may be the cargo. Thus valuable cargoes escape with a light tax, while cargoes of great bulk and less value may be considerably burdened. Moreover, the dock charges included in this total fall upon less than one-half of the total tonnage entering the port, the remaining portion having to incur charges of lighterage, &c., the total of which is not obtainable. Further examination of the system of charge of the dock companies for services leads me to suppose that it is not altogether in proportion to the services rendered, but is calculated to some extent ad valorem. I putin Tables 21 and 22 to illustrate this point. ‘To the extent that this system operates, the dock companies are imposing taxation upon goods entering the port. Altogether I hold it to be extremely dangerous to place this power of taxation in the hands of private companies and non-representative bodies. There is no elasticity in the system and no capacity to meet changing circumstances. What were perfectly good rates of charge when the com- panies obtained their parliamentary scales may not be so now, and the system of allowing favourable terms to certain traders has inevitably grown up. ‘This means that the companies must look to new sources of revenue, and their proposal last year to tax hghters was made without any examination of the effect this may have on the trade of the port. In the case of the Conservancy it means that expenditure on works must be limited to the amount derived from taxation. In contradistinction to the practice prevailing in the Port of London must be considered that prevailing in some ports of Britain and in most foreign ports, namely, that expenditure upon the upkeep of the port is looked upon as a public service which must be maintained at the necessary level, even if the cost is not entirely met out of taxation and charges upon shipping. In England, Bristol is a specially noticeable case. The docks were long controlled by the corporation, but its rights were sold to joint stock companies, who so injured the trade of the port that the corporation had to buy them out. This involved the levying of a municipal rate in addition to the dock charges for the purpose of maintaining and improving the port, and a harbour rate of from £10,000 to £20,000 a year has been levied. In the case of Manchester the Corporation was financially associated with the Ship Canal Company in raising money for the construction of the Manchester Ship Canal, the Corporation having advanced £5,000,000 to the company, this money being raised on the security of the City funds and rates. This loan involves a heavy charge on the rates at present, the amount transferred from the City fund in the year 1899-1900 to meet the charges for interest and sinking fund not met by the instalment of interest received from the Canal Company being £160,163. At Hamburg, Amsterdam, Rotterdam, and Antwerp much of the recent extension of the port accommodation is met out of municipal rates or imperial funds, and I have already pointed out that at the beginning of the century the Government advanced considerable sums (without interest) for the improvement of the Port of London. Another point to be considered is the expense of the present multiplied management of the port. The figures are as follows— 25 ee eS ———EEEEEEEEEEEeE Salaries and management expenses in 1899. Other manage- ment expenses (office expenses, Total. stamps, stationery and incidentals). Directors’ fees, Salaries. Superennuation. ‘ London and India Docks— £ £& £& £ £& Joint Committtee a me. 122,442 38,053 _ 3,600 8,807 172,902 London and St. Katharine Com- 968 4,319 Crothen”) 3,633 8,920 pany : (included in East and West India Company 3,885 3,041 salaries”) 858 8,284. 127,295 45,913 3,600 13,298 190,106 Millwall Docks ae a ee. 8,231 —— 1,900 2,909 13,040 Surrey Commercial Docks ... es 34,341 (Apparently| included under “sjalaries”’) 34,341 (‘management and salaries ’’) Total docks e..| 169,867 45,913 5,500 237,487 Thames Conservancy (lower naviga- 8,789 2,642 2,400 18,374 tion) (allowance to conservators). Port Sanitary Authority ... ae 2,621 113 150 3,658. (allowance to sani- tary committee). Total af a a 181,277 48,668 8,050 259,519 Trinity House (common to London 2,361 416 — 3,120 and outports) Total oe oat ee, 183,638 49,084 262,639 I next turn to questions relating to capital expenditure and require- ments. It would appear from the figures that the principal dock companies are not in a position to provide more money for capital purposes unless they have new sources of revenue. Some of the capital which is now employed has been spent upon purposes which are no longer produc- tive and for various financial operations in connection with the amalgama- tion of the companies, which cannot be said to benefit the Port. There is undoubtedly a large amount of capital lost in carrying out the many improvements and alterations of the dock premises from time to time. Of the amount of this it is not possible, with the information available, to give an accurate estimate. JI have examined the subject in detail, as far as it is shown by the powers, as to works given to the companies in their various Acts, and there is in these alone some evidence of duplication of expenditure. In connection with the financial operations which have taken place from time to time, I have estimated that about £1,700,000, now included in the nominal amount raised by the dock companies, has never been employed for direct capital services in the docks and Port of London; and I venture to think this fact: should be considered in estimating the claims of the companies to have paid for capital charges out of revenue. There is no sinking fund for the companies’ capital as there is in all municipal capital, and the dead capital goes on year after year sharing in the dividends, and thus sapping the vital energies of the undertaking. If all the bond fide dead capital were surrendered and employed for the purpose of improvement, it can be understood that a great deal could be done for the improvement of the port, but so long as the administration remains in the present hands such a step is not possible. These are a few considerations which I submit should be borne in mind in considering the financial position of the dock companies. This consideration of the finances of the port shows (1) that private authorities, like the dock companies, and non-representative bodies, like the Thames Conservancy and ‘Trinity House, have powers of taxation of 26 shipping and goods, which may affect the interests of commerce from the national pomt ‘of view as well as from the local point of view; (2) that the necessary limitations which Parliament has imposed upon the revenue to be levied by these authorities has resulted in such revenue not being found sufficient to meet all the requirements of the port; (3) that capital require- ments of the near future are not likely to be met by the existing bodies. This is in such marked contrast with the policy which is adopted in some of the principal ports abroad as to be of considerable importance. 27 Government of the Port of London. It is necessary first to consider what is meant by the Port of London. The extent of the port for the various purposes appears to be as follows— Tidal limits —The limit of the tidal action in the port is Teddington- lock, 19 miles above London-bridge. é The areas for the administration of the government and public services of the port may be shortly set out as follows— Seaward limit. 1. The Customs Port. [From Teddington Lock to] an imaginary straight line drawn The Port Sanitary Port. from the pilot mark at the entrance of Havengore-creek in Essex The Thames Conservancy to the land’s end at Warden Point in Sheppey, Kent, and including Port—for port dues. part of the estuary of the Medway. [As appointed for customs purposes by Treasury Minute of 1st August, 1883, under the authority of the Customs Consolidation Act, 1876; the Port Sanitary port to be the same area, as enacted by sec. ili. of the Public Health (London) Act, 1891, and the Thames Conservancy port for port dues to be the same area, as enacted by sec. 3 and sec. 155 of the Thames Conservancy Act, 1894. The Port Sanitary port is always to have the same limits as the Customs port. The Thames Conservancy for port dues is also to have the same area as the Customs port, within the limits mentioned in the second schedule to the Thames Conservancy Act, 1894. These limits are now considerably beyond the actual limits of the Customs port. | 2. The Thames Conservancy An imaginary line drawn from the entrance to Yantlet-creek —for general purposes. in Kent to the City Stone in Hssex (and so much of the river Lea and Bow-creek respectively as are below the south boundary stones mentioned in the Lee Conservancy Act, 1868). [As defined by the Thames Conservancy Act, 1894, s. 3.] 3. The Thames Conservancy A straight line drawn from Shoeburyness water tower in Hssex —for dredging and to Hastchurch Church in Kent (outside the jurisdiction of the ballasting. Conservators of the Medway). [As defined by the Thames Conservancy Act, 1894, s. 3 (1).] 4, The Thames Conser- The same as Thames Conservancy for general purposes, but vancy—for pollution. including the whole of the tributaries down to the western boundary of the County of London, and three miles from the Thames of all tributaries eastward of the western boundary of the County of London, except the Lea, where the limit is the south boundary stones mentioned in the Lea Conservancy Act, 1868. [As defined by the Thames Conservancy Act, 1894, s. 90.] For the duty of preserving the flow and purity of the water of the river and carrying out the necessary scavenging, the eastern limit of the Thames Conservancy is the western boundary of the County of London. [As defined by the Thames Conservancy Act, 1894, s. 91.] 5. The Trinity House—for For licensing pilots the limits of the London district are from pilotage. London-bridge and Rochester-bridge respectively to Orfordness to the north and Dungeness to the south. {The Trinity House shall not license a pilot to conduct ships both above and below Gravesend ]. [As defined by the Merchant Shipping Act, 1894, s. 618}. 6. The Trinity House—for The Trinity House has (subject to the rights of local lhght- lighting and buoying. house and buoy authorities) the superintendence and management of all lighthouses and buoys throughout Hngland and Wales, the Channel Islands and Gibraltar. | According to the Merchant Shipping Act, 1894, s. 634. 7. Watermen’s and Lighter- [From Teddington Lock to] Lower Hope-point near Graves- men’s Company. end in Kent, and all docks, canals, creeks and harbours of the Thames, so far as the tide flows. {As defined by the Thames Watermen’s and Lightermen’s Act, 1893, s. 3.] 28 It will be seen that the areas of several authorities differ considerably, and that for most of the chief public services—lghting, buoying, pilotage, dredging, pollution—the area of administration is a differmg one. The area of administration of the Thames Conservancy has, for instance, several limits according to the service performed. The government of the port and the administration of the services are made difficult of consideration through being in the hands of so many authorities administering similar or differing services over conterminous or differing areas. The chief authorities are— The Thames Conservancy, for the conservancy of the whole of the Thames, including the port, the area of its jurisdiction in the port differing in limits for various purposes. The Trinity House of Deptford Strond for pilotage, lighting and buoying from London Bridge seawards. The City Corporation for port sanitary purposes from Teddington-lock seawards. The Watermen’s and Lightermen’s Company from Teddington-lock to Gravesend. In addition to these there are many other authorities with statutory powers which have to be taken into account, such as the dock companies and other companies having statutory powers in the port, and the several local authorities. In Table 23 I deal with the government and administration of the port from the point of view of the various duties and services. The heads of government and service are as follows— Regulation of navigation. Removal and prevention of obstructions. Port sanitary. Prevention of pollution. Police. Levy of dues on shipping. Lighting. Buoying. Beacons. Pilotage. Moorings. Dredging. Ballasting. Landing accommodation. In respect of each of these heads I have set out in the table the authorities administering the duty or service, and the enactment regulating such administration. 29 System of Government of the other Ports of the United Kingdom. In connection with the above evidence as to the present administration of the port, the constitution of other port authorities in the Kingdom will be useful. In Table 24 I set out the authority as created by Parliament in 113 of the ports of the United Kingdom, the Act creating such constitution being stated in each case. These are the constituted port authorities with- out reference to the duties they may perform or the extent to which the services of the port are in their hands. The authorities may be divided into five groups; (1) municipal; (2) municipal in part; (8) public (non-municipal); (4) private owners; (5) special. 1. Municipal—There are 22 ports where the municipal authority has complete control as follows (see Table 24)— Aberdeen Campbeltown Lynn Aberystwith Cardigan Penzance Arbroath Chester Preston Barnstaple Colchester Stranraer Beaumaris Drogheda Weymouth Boston Exeter Wigtown Bridgwater Galway Wisbeach Bristol Of these 17 are governed by the corporations or town councils ; 4 by the municipal authority acting as harbour commissioners or trustees, and 1 by the municipal authority acting as a conservancy board. Bristol is a specially noticeable case. It was long controlled by the corporation, but the dock rights were sold to joint stock companies, who so injured the trade of the port that the Corporation bought them out. This involved the levying of a municipal rate in addition to the dock charges for the purpose of maintaining and improving the port, anda harbour rate. of from £10,000 to £20,000 a year has been levied. 2. Municipal im part—This group consists of 67 ports (see Table 24). The municipal authority shares its control in some cases with public, in others with private, and in other cases with both public and private authorities. They are as follows— Alloa Harwich Poole Ayr Hull Portsmouth Banff Inverness Rochester Belfast Ipswich Scarborough Berwick-on-T'weed Irvine Shields, North and Blyth Kirkcaldy South Carnarvon Kirkwall Shoreham Coleraine Lancaster Skibbereen Cork Leith Sligo Cowes, Isle of Wight Lerwick Southampton Dartmouth Limerick Stockton-on-Tees . Dover Littlehampton Stornoway Dublin Llanelly Sunderland Dumfries Londonderry Swansea Dundalk Maryport Tralee Dundee Middlesbrough Waterford Falmouth Montrose Westport Faversham Newcastle-on-Tyne Wexford Fowey Newport Whitby Fraserburgh Padstow Whitehaven Glasgow Peterhead Wick Gloucester Plymouth (Catte- Yarmouth Greenock water) Hartlepool Of these, 33 are governed by Harbour Commissioners ; 13 by Harbour Trustees ; 7 by Conservancy or River Commissioners; 1 by the Board of Trade and a Harbour Board; 1 by the Admiralty and Corporation ; and 30 the remainder by sundry bodies of Commissioners, &c., in all of which the Corporation or the ratepayers are represented. The most important ports in the United Kingdom, with the exception of Cardiff and Liverpool, are to be found in this group, and are under the control of authorities partly municipal and partly representative of public and private interests or both. At Hull the corporation had a recognised statutory right of acquiring for a public trust, to be defined by Parlament, the property of the Old Hull Dock Company. It invested instead £100,000 in the Hull and Barnsley Railway Company’s dock, when the Hull Dock Company was empowered by Parliament to require the Corporation to exercise its right of purchase within two years, or lose it for ever. The right was allowed to lapse. Glasgow was originally in the hands of the magistrates and the City Council, but 1s now managed by a harbour trust. With reference to the Tyne Ports the corporation had been the conservators from time immemorial, but was replaced by Commissioners in 1850. The Tees, Wear and Tay Ports and Belfast are similar cases to the Tyne Ports. 3. Public authority (non-munictpal)—Under this heading are included those ports where neither the municipal body nor the ratepayer has any share in the government of the port, but at the same time the-authority contrels the port for public purposes and not for commercial profit. They are as follows (see Table 24)— Channel Islands— Liverpool. Alderney. Ramsgate. Guernsey. Runcorn. Jersey. Teignmouth. Two of these are under the control of the Board of Trade, two of the local government of the island they are situated upon, and the remainder of harbour commissioners, &c., representing the various interests in the port. In Liverpool the corporation formerly administered this port, but have given way to the Mersey Docks and Harbour Board. 4. Private owners.—This group consists of 16 ports, which are con- trolled by companies or individual owners. ‘They are as follows— Ardrossan Grangemouth Newhaven Barrow | Granton Newry Cardiff Grimsby Scilly Carlisle Lowestoft Troon Fleetwood Milford— Folkestone Milford Haven Goole New Milford Of these, six are under the control of railway companies, two of harbour companies, three of private owners, two of dock companies, one of a canal and a railway company jointly, and two of canal and navigation companies. At Cardiff there has been a movement in favour of the corporation acquiring the entire property in the Bute Docks. In 1892 a modified form of this proposal was suggested to the effect that corporate influence over and part ownership of the docks should be acquired by the corporation investing money for their extension. 5. Special—In the case of Manchester the corporation are at present represented on the company to the extent of 11 members out of a total of 21, but this representation is subject to reduction as the corporation loan is paid off (see Table 24). Under the powers of the Manchester Ship Canal Acts, the Corporation has lent to the Ship Canal Company £5,000,000, resulting at present in.a considerable charge on the rates, a policy deliberately considered in the interests of the city as a whole. 31 Foreign Ports. I have reserved for the last a few points in connection with the foreign ports which bear upon the previous evidence. ‘The consular reports issued annually from the foreign office have for the past seven or eight years been continually reminding the country of the great attention which was being paid to the development of certain ports, and particularly with reference to Hamburg, Rotterdam, Amsterdam, Antwerp and Havre. I have at hand such of the reports as bear upon this question, and if the Commission desires I could prepare a memorandum giving such points as are pertinent. Without at the present dealing with these reports I am able to place before the Commission certain facts which I have investigated myself. The Rivers Committee of the Council deemed this subject of sufficient importance for me to visit certain of the foreign ports for the purposes of this evidence, and during last summer I went to Hamburg, Amsterdam, Rotterdam and Antwerp. In the evidence relating to London, already placed before the Com- mission, I have ventured to suggest that the statistics relating to shipping pointed in the direction, if they did not absolutely prove, that the trade of London was suffering from the condition of its port; and I pointed out that other ports of the kingdom which have developed their docks and harbours have secured an increased proportion of the trade of the kingdom. I also suggested, that this relative falling back of London might also mean a loss to the nation at large, by reason of trade going to foreign orts. 5 I now propose to place some figures before the Commission relating to some of the above-named ports. I think the conclusion is irresistible, that those ports have been enabled to develope their trade because of the extension and development of their dock and harbour facilities. If this is so, I think it would be hard to resist the correlative conclusion that the proportional falling back of London is due to the want of corresponding development and attention in the docks and port. I put intwo Tables (25 and 26) showing the shipping and trade of the port of Hamburg. Table 25 gives the number and tonnage of the shipping entered at the port during the century. It will be seen how enormous the growth has been. Table 26 shows the weight and value of imports, and the figures are correspondingly striking. ‘l'wo very large docks are now being constructed in addition to those opened in recent years, and every improvement in machinery, warehouses and facilities for unloading and storage is made from time to time. At Amsterdam I also found considerable extension of docks and harbour works in order to introduce the latest improvements. I put ina Table (27) showing the shipping entered at the port in the years 1884-99. The increase in the last four years is especially noticeable. At Rotterdam great extensions were going on. An entirely new water way was constructed in 1872. I put in a Table (28) showing the shipping entered at this port for a series of years. As in Amsterdam the increase in the last four years is the most marked feature. At Antwerp again considerable works are in progress, and I put in two tables (29 and 3Q) showing the increase of trade at this port. The figures are equally striking with those for Hamburg, the increase since 1890 being over 50 per cent. There is nothing in the United Kingdom to equal the increase in shipping in recent years that has taken place at these four ports. In all these places the docks and harbour are under the control of the municipality, and it is a universal policy with the authorities to undertake all that is needed by way of improvement without reference to any limits of revenue which arise from charges on shipping. By this means the service is kept at its full height, in all branches, whether it be dredging, buoying, lighting, construction of cranes and other machinery, provision of ware- house accommodation suitable to different classes of goods, connection of all parts of the port together by means of railways or steam tram- ways and vessels of various kinds, and the provision of a competent and expert staff to deal with all branches of the service. TABLES ACCOMPANYING THE STATEMENT OF EVIDENCE. A—SUMMARY OF EVENTS. ly Synopsis of powers granted to dock companies, B.—DOCK ACCOMMODATION. 2. Water area of the Docks of London. C.—TRADE OF THE PORT. F, G. 3. Number and tonnage of shipping entered at the Port of London, 1798-1899. 4, Number and tonnage of shipping cleared from the Port of London, 1798-1899. 5. Average tonnage of sailing and steam vessels entered at the Port of London, 1841-99. 6. Classification according to tonnage of foreign-going steam vessels belonging to the United Kingdom, 1860-99. 7. Classification according to tonnage of foreign-going sailing vessels belonging to the United Kingdom, 1860-99. 8. Classification according to tonnage of sailing and steam vessels belonging to certain British ports. Y. Steam vessels above 7,000 gross tonnage arranged according to nationality. 10. Classification according to gross tonnage of steam vessels belonging to various nationalities and proportion each bears to the total of each country. 11. Shipping entered with cargoes at the Port of London and London’s proportion of the United Kingdom. 12. Shipping cleared with cargoes from the Port of London and London’s proportion of the United Kingdom. 13. Tonnage of shipping entered at the Port of London from each of the chief foreign countries and British possessions and London’s proportion of the United Kingdom, 1861, 1871, 1881, 1891, 1899. 14. - Tonnage of shipping cleared from the Port of London for each of the chief foreign countries and British possessions and London’s proportion of the United Kingdom, 1861, 1871, 1881, 1891, 1899. 15. Value of Imports into the Port of London, and London’s proportion of the United Kingdom, 1872-99. 16. Value of Exports from the Port of London and London’s proportion of the United Kingdom, 1857-99. 17. A,B,C, Dand E. Transhipment trade of the Port of London and London’s proportion of the United Kingdom, 1853-99. 18. Comparison of the proportion which the shipping of the Port of London and of certain competing ports bears to the shipping of the United Kingdom. 19. Population of Greater London and Greater London’s proportion of the United Kingdom. FINANCE. 20. A,B,C, Dand E. Revenue and expenditure of the authorities of the Port of London. DOCK CHARGES. 21. 22. Classification of ‘landing rate,” London and India Docks. “ Tanding and delivery rate,” London and India Docks. PORT GOVERNMENT. 23. 24. Government of the Port of London. System of government in other ports of the kingdom. FOREIGN PORTS. 25. 26. 27. 28, Shipping entered at the Port of Hamburg, 1791-1899. Weight and value of imports into the Port of Hamburg, 1850-99. Shipping entered at the Port of Amsterdam, 1884-99. Shipping entered at the Port of Rotterdam, 1850-99, 9: 30 { shipping entered at the Port of Antwerp, 1870-99. Synopsis of the Powers granted to the London (Arranged nm Works authorised 8 Name of Date of Act. Company. 1 2 West India | 39 Geo. IIL, Docks cap. 69 [1799] London Docks Geo. III, cap. 47 [1800] Construction of one or more navigable dock or docks, basin or basins, and cut or cuts, to communicate with the Thames at Blackwall and Limehouse Hole, with thenecessary quays, wharves, and warehouses (56-57) Construction of four or more piers with- in the tideway of the Thames, two or more at Blackwall, and two or more at Limehouse Hole (59) Construction of cuts, sluices, bridges, roads, &c. (60) Construction of drains to carry off water from private property (61) Alteration of sewers in or near the docks (62) Construction of draw and swivel bridges (63) Alteration and diversion of highways (64) Construction of feeders for supplying the docks with water (68) Purchase of land in the Isle of Dogs, necessary for making the docks and works (74) 39 and 40,| Making, completing, altering, &c., of basins and docks, with quays and wharves adjoining, and entrances into the Thames, and all necessary locks, sluices, culverts, drains, bridges, roads, piers, and other works (1, 25, 57) Construction of a wall, 20 ft. high, surrounding the docks (27) Construction of works for supplying docks with water (28) Construction of three bridges and other passages across the docks (29) Alteration of sewers interfering with the docks and works (80) Purchase of land for purposes of the undertaking (31, 96) Purchase of Shadwell waterworks for £50,000 (38) West India | 42 Geo. III., | Completion of docks and works autho- Docks cap. 113 [1802] rised by 39 Geo. IIL, ( preamble) Surrounding the docks by walls not less than 20 ft. high (8, 4) cap. 69 ~ Capital Authorised. 4 £ 600,000 1,500,000 200,000 River Thames. 5 Power of Common Council to build piers at Black- walland Limehouse Hole, to facilitate entrances into canal, &. (59). Power of Company to regulate the mooring of vessels near the entrances into the canals, docks, basins, and cuts (95) Power of dock-master in the Thames as to re- moval of vessels to ex- tend to 200 yards from the dock entrance (79) Dock Companies by Act of Parliament. chronological order.) Port. Power of Lord Mayor to appoint harbour-masters (78). Power of directors of Company, or any five | or more of them, to appoint a dock-master to be approved of by Cor- poration of Trinity House (80). Quays in such of the docks as are walled round to be legal quays (86). Power of Common Council to make bye-laws for port and canal (108). Power of Company to make bye- laws, rules, and regula- tions for the good gov- ernment of the docks and their appurtenances (109) Power to make bye-laws for the good government of the Company and of the officers, servants, and persons employed (17). Power to assign the rates as a security on borrowed capital (22). Power to sell or lease the Com- any’s premises or any part thereof (53). Power to prosecute in case of damage done to the Com- pany’s works (58). Power of Directors to make rules and regulations for the proper government of the business of the docks (75) Powers granted as to Navigation. Power of Common Council to supply canal with water from ‘Thames (5). Power to scour canal and to remove wrecks (10). Power of Company to scour docks and remove wrecks (70). Power to take water from the Thames for the use of the docks (28). Power to scour the bed of the river and to preserve the depth at the entrance of the docks so as to allow vessels to enter (66). Power to scour the docks and to remove wrecks and other obstructions at the expense of persons causing such obstruc- tions (84) are eee Shipping. 8 Power of dock-master or his assistant to order out of docks light vessels, and on every neglect to } remove them, charges for doing if necessary to be levied by distress and sale (101). Power of Corporationto make rates for vessels using the canal (136). Power of Company to levy certain rates on shipping using the docks (137). Power of Company to ascertain tonnage or admeasure- ment of ships (141). Power of Company to measure, &c, ships or vessels (143). Power of Corporation to vary rates on vessels using the canal (145). Power of Com- pany to vary rates on vessels using the docks (146) Power to take rates on certain shipping entering the docks (59). Power to ascertain the tonnage or admeasurement of ships (63). Power of Company’s officers to have access to registers, of all shipping resorting to the port, at the Cus- tom House (64). Power to measure, &c., ships or vessels (65). Power of dock-master to direct and regulate the mooring, numooring, moving or removing of all ships, vessels, or lighters com- ing into, lying in, or going out of the Company’s premises, eitheras to time or position, discharging or loading; as to the time Table 1, mre ES ET SE SSE A SESE EGE SS OE SESE SE SS A ET Commerce. eee nee Power to take rates on certain goods entering the docks (59) of opening orshutting the gates thereof, and on failure of master, d&c., of vessels to carry out his directions to order his assistants to do so at the owner’s expense (78 & 80). Vessels and craft not to be in the river within 200 yards of the entrance to the docks unless it is for the purpose of coming inor going out of the docks. master to remove such vessels (79). Power of dock- Power of dock- master to order out of the docks all light vessels, &c., and on the refusal of the master to obey this order to order his assistants to do so at the expense of the vessel (92) Power to prevent West Indian vessel breaking bulk until the whole of her cargo be duly en- tered (17) Power to enter goods on neglect of owners, &c., to do so after seven days of vessels being reported at Customs (15). Power to take additional rates on goods being West Indian produce (21) Synopsis of the Powers granted to the Company. 1 East India Docks London Docks West India Docks London Docks London Docks London Docks Hast India Docks London Docks London Docks Date of Act. 2 43 Geo. III., cap. 126 [1803 ] 4d Geo. IIT., cap. 2 [1804] 44 Geo. III., cap. 7 [1804] 44 Geo. III., cap. 100 [1804] 45 Geo. IIL., cap. 58 [1805] 46 Geo. IIL, cap. 59. [1806] 46 Geo. III., cap. 113 [1806 ] A7 Geo. III., cap. 9 [1807] 49 Geo. IIL, cap. clvi. [1809] Works authorised. 3 Purchase of lands and buildings neces- sary for making the docks and works authorised, and of lands and buildings situate within 30 feet of the wall en- closing the docks (26) Construction of one or more navigable dock or docks, basin or basins, with entrances to communicate with the Thames at Blackwall (41) Surrounding the docks by a brick or stone wall not less than 20 feet high (42) Building two or more piers within the tideway of the Thames at Blackwall (43) Construction of sluices, locks, floodgates, engines, machines, pipes, bridges, roads and other works (44) Construction of drains, &c., to carry off water from adjoining property (45) Alteration of sewers and drains in or near the docks (46) Construction of draw and swivel bridges over some of the dock entrances (47) Alteration and diversion of roads inter- fering with the docks (48) Construction of feeders for supplying the docks with water (50) Completion of works authorised under 39 & 40 Geo. IIIL., cap. 47 (preamble) Completion of works authorised by 39 Geo. III., cap. 69 (preamble) seen Completion of works authorised under 39 & 40 Geo. IIIL., cap. 47 (preamble) Purchase of land and buildings for pur- poses of the undertaking (2) Construction of footbridge at inner part of entrance lock (5) Provision of greater accommodation for shipping ( preamble) Subscription of £10,000 at interest to complete the road to the docks (8) Purchase of additional land (10) Surrounding the boundary wall of the inward dock by a public way 10 feet wide (15) Purchase of water works supplying Stratford, West Ham, Bow, Bromley, &e. (1) Capital Authorised. 4 £ 300,000 500,000 400,000 500,000 100,000 eeeeee eee eee River Thames. 5 Power to build piers in the Thames to facilitate the entrances into the docks (43). Power of dock-master to extend into the Thames to a distance of 200 yards from the extremity of the wing wall of any entrance into the docks (99) aeeaee ceeeee eteeee serene see eee oeeaee seeeee London Dock Companies—continued. Table 1—continued. 5 rates as security for loans (10). Power to make bye-laws for re- culating the docks and theirappurtenances (79). Power of officials of the Company to have access to registers of ships at the Custom House (96) Power to assign dock rates as security for loans (2) Power to assign dock rates as security for loans (2) Power to assign dock rates as security for loans (6) ereeee ones aneene Powers granted as to &c., with water from the Thames (50). Power to scour the docks, &ec. ; and to remove wrecks and other obstructions at the expense of the persons causing such obstructions (56) eeeeee eee aee oveeee to direct the mooring, unmooring, moving or removing of all vessels and lighters, to assign their position for loading or unloading, to regulate the times of opening and shutting lock gates, and on failure of masters, &c., of vessels to carry out his directions, to order his assistants to do so at the owner’s expense. Power of dock-master to regulate the moorings of vessels near the entrance into the docks (67). Power of dock-master to order out of docks all light vessels when neces- sary (72). Power to take certain rates for vessels using the docks (9] and 99). Power to ascertain the tonnage and admea- surement of ships (95). Power to measure, &c., ships and vessels (97). ere nee een aee Paeeee whee sete Power of dock-master as to the removal of vessels, &e. (8) Port. Navigation. Shipping. Commerce. 6 8 9 Power to assign dock} Power tosupply the docks, | Dock-mastertohavepower | Power to take certain rates on goods entering the Company’s premises (91 and 99) eeeeee Power to land and ware- house goods not duly entered at the Customs within seven days after the vessel has been re- ported at the Customs. ereeee Commercial Docks Commercial Docks Hast Country Dock Date of Act. 2 Synopsis of the Powers granted to the Works Authorised. 3 50 Geo. IIL., cap. 151 [1810] 50 Geo. ITI, cap. ccvll. [1810] 51 Geo. 11S 51 Geo. III., cap. 171 [1811] Completion of works authorised under previous Acts (1) Purchase and improvement of Greenland Dock and other docks and premises (preamble) Extension and improvement of Green- land Dock, and construction of basins, docks, and ponds with entrances, quays, wharves, &c. (2, 20, 21, 66). Construction of works for supplying water to the doeks (23) Construction of bridges across entrances to the docks (25) Alteration of roads interfering with the docks (26) Construction of swing bridges over every cut or sluice connecting the docks with the Thames (30) Alteration of sewers in or near the docks (36) Purchase of lands (39-41) Construction of sluices, bridges, roads, and other works (67) the Completion and improvement of Com- mercial Docks, and construction of cuts, entrances, feeders, aqueducts, sluices, wharves, quays, and other works (preamble) Alteration of footway from Grove-street to Great Russell-street (11) Construction of swivel bridges instead of bridges required by 50 Geo. IIL, cap. cevii. (13) Construction of works for supplying water to the docks (2) Completion of docks, feeders, sluices, roads, bridges, wharves and other works (10, 40) Construction of two platform bridges over the sluice joining the docks with the Thames (39) 60,000 Capital Authorised. 4 3 750,000 260,000 130,000 (in addition to amount already subscribed) River Thamee. 5 preeee Power of dock-master to extend into the Thames for a distance of 100 yards from the dock entrances (71) Powerof dockmaster to ex- tend into the Thames for a distance of 100 yards from the dock en- trances (27) London Dock Companies—continued. Port. Power to assign dock rates as security for loans (2) Power to assign dock rates as security for loans (14). Power to make bye-laws for the good government of the Company’s pre- mises, &e. (23) Powers granted as to Navigation. Power to take water from the Thames for the pur- poses of the docks (28). Power to scour the bed of the river and preserve the proper depth at the entrance of the docks (74) ste eee Power to take water from the Thames for the pur- poses of the docks (2). Power to scour the bed of the river and preserve the proper depth at the entrance to the docks (8). Power to remove wrecks and other obstructions at the expense of the per- son causing the obstruc- tions (32) Shipping. 8 Power of dock-master to direct the mooring, un- mooring, moving, or re- moving of all vessels, &c., to assign them position for loading and unload- ing, to regulate time of opening and shutting the gates, and on failure of masters, &c., of vessels to carry out his directions to order his assistants to do so at the owners’ expense (71). Power of dock-master to remove vessels from within 100 yards of the dock en- trances except when coming in or going out of the docks (71). Power to take rates on shipping entering the docks (24) Power of dock-master to direct the mooring, un- mooring, moving, or re- moving of all vessels, &e. to assigu their position for leading aad unload- ing, to regulate time of opening and shutting the gates, and on failure of masters, &c. to carry out his directions, to order his assistants to do so at the owners’ expense (26). Power of dock - master to remove vessels from within 100 yards of the dock entrances except when coming in or goin out of the docks (27). Power to take rates on all vessels entering the docks (45). Power of dock-master to order out of the docks all light vessels, &e. (49) Table 1—continued. Commerce, 9 Power to take certain goods the docks (24) Power to take certain goods the docks (45) rates on entering rates on entering Synopsis of the Powers granted to the Name of - Company. 1 London Docks .. London Docks London Docks East India Docks London Docks Commercial Docks London Docks London Docks Kast Country Docks St. Katha- rine’s Dock Date of Act. 2 51 Geo. III., cap. 49 [1811] 52 Geo. IIL, cap. 114 [1812] 54 Geo. III, cap, 40 [1814] 54 Geo. IIL, cap. 228 [1814] 55 Geo. IIL, cap. iil. [1815] 57 Geo. IIL, cap. lxi, [1817] 58 Geo. IIL, cap. xu. [1818] 4 Geo. IV., cap. CXxXlv. [1823] 6 Geo. IV., cap. Ixiv. [1825 ] 6 Geo. IV., cap. CV. [1825] Works authorised. Extending the time for completion of works already authorised (1) Extending the time for completion of works already authorised (2) Purchase of land adjoining the com- pany’s premises (5, 6) Enlarging the entrance basin on the land to be purchased under the Act (8) Building warehouses, wharves, quays, cranes, &c., on the banks of the docks and basins (9) Completion of works previously author- ised (4) ere eee Purchase of lands and buildings for purposes of the undertaking (3) Construction of one swing carriage bridge near the Hermitage instead of two bridges directed by 39 & 40 Geo. III., cap. 47 (7) Hixtending the time for completion of works already authorised (1) Completion, extension, enlargement of the docks (10) Purchase of lands, buildings, &c., for the purposes of the undertaking (39) Alteration and stopping up of roads, &c., interfering with the dock premises (74) Construction of docks, basins, locks, and cuts, with entrances from the Thames, and of quays, wharves, warehouses, engines, bridges, sluices, and other works (75) Construction of a wall not less than 15 feet high round the docks (77) Construction of piers within the tide- way of the Thames (78) Construction of locks, flood-gates, sluices, engines, bridges, roads and other works, and laying down of buoys, mooring craft, &c., in the Thames (79) Construction of draw and turning bridges over the entrances (80, 81) Building, stopping up and altering sewers (85) Alteration, turning, widening, improv- ing, &c., of highways and the making of new ones in place of those stopped up (83, 86) Construction of works for supplying docks with water (88) Authorised. Capital River Thames. 5 TOR RIE 81000 eS a ee SE aeaie iera 100,000 errere 300,000 eee 00g) i hi ele arenes ere oee Power to build piers with- in the tideway of the Thames near the en- trances to the Company’s docks (78). Power of dock-master to extend to 100 yardsintothe Thames from the entrance into the docks (100) 1,852,752 Table 1—continued. London Dock Companies—continued. 9 Powers granted as to Navigation. Shipping. Commerce. 7 8 9 Power to take rates on wines and spirits landed in the docks (1--2) ayaa lt wi)! Pe) OE er. ovages.) Sf PCA tee DO Fees Sen oe |) aspects © Or Ue a” Lee Pett Feweiee ph RSTO Power to take additional rates on goods brought into the docks (36-39) Power of dock-master to order any ship entering the docks to be dis- mantled in order to avoid damage to shipping in the docks, and to fix the amount of ballast requisite to be taken on board (23). Dock-master to have control of barges, &c., in the docks (24). Power to take additional rates on shipping entering the docks (386-39) eeesee ereeoe Power to assign the rates as security for loans (5) Power to ascertain the Power to assign the rates as security for loans (2). Power of dock officials to have access to registers of ships at the Custom House (18) Power to assign the rates as security for loans (12) ereeve Power of dock-master to tonnage or admeasure- ment of ships entering the docks (17). Power to measure ships and vessels (19) order removal of empty lighters, &e. (13) Cau | Ss ee 2 oC 0d Power to make bye-laws | Power to lay down buoys, | Dock-master to have} Power to take rates on for the good government | dolphins, &c., in the| power to direct the moor-| certain goods entering of the Company, &c.(20).| Thames near the en-| img, unmooring, moving| the Company’s premises Power to assign dock rates as security for loans (27). Power of direc- tors to make rules and regulations for the entry and departure of vessels, &c., the landing, ship- ping, and warehousing of goods, the shutting of gates, entrances, d&c. (95) trances to the docks (79). Power to supply the docks, &c., with water from the Thames (88). Power to remove wrecks and other obstructions at the expense of the per- sons causing such ob- structions (90) or removing of all ves- sels, lighters, and craft, to assign their position for loading or unloading, to regulate the times of opening and shutting lock gates, and on failure of masters, &c., of ves- sels to carry out his directions to order his assistants to do so at the owners’ expense. Power of dock-master to direct the dismantling, c&c., of vessels entering the docks in order to avoid damage to the shipping or to the Company’s premises, and to fix the amount of ballast requi- site to be taken on board (97 & 99). Vessels and (113). .Gates and doors of warehouses, vaults, &c., used for dutiable goods to be under the joint locks of the Com- any and the revenue officers (121). Power to examine goods on board vessels in the docks (125). Copy of the mani- fest of ships entering the docks to be delivered to the Company (126). Power to enter, land, and warehouse goods not duly entered at the customs within seven days after the vessel has been re- ported at the customs (127) craft not to remain in the river within 100 yards of the dock entrances, except for the purpose of coming in or going out of the docks, or for loading or dis- charging at wharves on the river within that distance; power of dock-master to remove such vessels on re- fusal of master to do so (100-1). Power of dock- master to order removal of light vessels, &c., from the docks (105). Power to take rates on vessels using the docks (112). Power to ascertain the ton- nage or admeasurement of ships (123). Power to measure ships or vessels (124). Name of Date of Act. Company. 1 2 Synopsis of the Powers granted to the Works authorised. 3 East India 9 Geo. IV., Docks | cap. xev. [1828] London 9 Geo. IV., Docks cap. CXvi. [1828] Construction of new docks, basins, en- trances from the Thames, and altera- tion and enlargement of the docks and works (65) Purchase of property necessary for new works (72) Building two or more piers within the tideway of the Thames at Blackwall (98) Construction of sluices, locks, engines, pipes, bridges, roads, and other works (99), and of draw and swivel bridges over the entrances and at other places (101) Alteration and diversion of roads inter- fering with new works (102) Alteration of the course of the river Lea (103) Alteration of sewers or drains in or near the docks (105) Construction of feeders for supplying the docks with water (106) Construction of drains, &c. to carry off water from adjoining property (107) Erection of warehouses, wharves, quays, cranes, sheds and engines (116) Completion and improvement of works (preamble) Construction of additional entrance to docks at Shadwell with all necessary basins, locks, cuts, sluices, bridges, roads and other works (46, 87) Purchase of land and premises for purposes of the undertaking (50, 79, 81-2) Purchase of Shadwell Docks (79) Alteration, diversion and stopping up of highways interfering with docks (84-5) Alteration of sewers interfering with docks (86) Laying down of buoys, dolphins and mooring craft (87) Construction of piers at the several entrances of the docks, no pier to project more than 30 feet (96) Construction of a wall at least 15 feet high surrounding the docks (98) Construction of two bridges at places mentioned (100) Capital Authorised. 4 Q 00,000 400,000 Power to River Thames. 5 Power to build and main- tain piers in the Thames at the entrances of the docks. Dockmaster’s powers to extend to that part of the Thames with- in 200 yards from any entrance except Lime- house entrance into the South West India Dock, where his power shall only extend 150 yards from the centre of the entrance build — piers | within the tideway of the Thames near the entrances to the com- pany’s docks (96). Powers of dockmaster in the Thames to extend to 200 yards from the dock entrances (126). London Dock Companies—continued. Table 1—continued 11 Port. Powers granted as to Navigation. Power to assign rates as | Power to supply the docks, security for loans (25.). Power to make bye-laws and regulations for gov- erning the concerns of the company and the officers, servants and persons employed (80). Power of directors to make rules and regu- lations for the regulating of the company’s busi- ness and works (42) Power to make bye-laws | Power to lay down buoys, for the government of the company (18). Power to assign rates as security for loans (40). Power to sell or lease the docks, warehouses, cc. (76). Power of directors to make rules and regu- lations for the regulating of the company business and works (120) &e., with water from the Thames and Lea, and to make feeders, d&c., for that purpose (106). Power to scour the docks and to remove wrecks and other obstructions at the expense of persons causing such obstruc- tions (114) Shipping. 8 Power to take rates on vessels entering the com- pany’s docks (115). Power to ascertain the tonnage or admeasure- ment of vessels entering the docks (119). Power to detain and distrain vessels, &c., and their effects on non-payment of charges; payment to be recoverable by dis- tress if not made within fourteen days (121). Power to examine goods on board vessels in the docks at the request of master, owner, or consignee, in order to ascertain damages occasioned to such goods by improper stowage or otherwise (146). Power of dockmaster to direct the movements of all vessels using the docks, to regulate the times of opening and shutting lock gates, and on failure of masters, &c., of vessels to carry out his directions to order his assistants to do so at the owners expense (155). Power of dock- master to direct the dismantling, c&c., of vessels entering the docks in order to avoid damage to the shipping or tothe company’s premises, and to fix the amount of ballast requisite to be taken on board (156). Power of directors or any five or more of them to alter or annul orders of dockmasters, and to give other orders (159). Power of dockmaster to remove all vessels lying in the river within 150 yards of the Limehouse entrance to the South West India Dock, or within 200 yards of the other dock entrances, unless for the purpose of coming in or going out of the docks, on refusal of masters to do so; this provision not to apply to vessels loading or unloading at wharves within 100 yards of the entrances of the Kast India Docks, but vessels lying at such wharves not to obstruct the entrances, and to be removed when required by dockmaster (162). No vessel to navigate in or enter the docks under sail except with the special permission of one of the dock- masters (164) dolphins, &c., in the Thames near the en- trances to the docks (87). shipping entering the docks (101). Power to detain and distrain ves- Power to scour the docks and to remove wrecks and other obstructions at the expense of persons causing such obstructions (92). Power to scour the bed of the river and preserve the depths at the entrances of the docks (94). Power to supply docks, &c., with water from the Thames and to make feeders, &c., for that purpose (97). sels, &c., and their effects on non-payment of charges. Payment to be recoverable by distress if not made within five days (102). Power to ascertain the tonnage or: admeasurement of ships (104). Power to mea- sure vessels (105). Power to prevent vessels breaking bulk until the whole cargo has been duly entered at the Cus- toms (115). Powers to dockmasters to direct the movement of all vessels using the docks, to regulate the time of opening and shutting lock gates, and on failure of masters of vessels to carry out his direc- tions to order his assistants to do so at the owners expense (125). Power of dockmaster to remove all vessels in the river within 200 yards of the entrances of the docks except those entering and leaving the docks (126-7). No vessel to navigate the docks under sail without permission of the dockmaster (128). Power of dockmaster to direct the dis- mantling, &c., of vessels entering the docks in order to avoid damage to shipping, &c., and to fix amount of ballast requisite to be taken on board (129). Power of dockmaster to order removal of light vessels and lighters, c&c., from the docks (130-1). Commerce. 9 Power to make reason- able rates, rents or sums on all goods for wharf- age, unshipping, landing, re-landing, piling, hous- ing, weighing, coopering, sampling, unpiling, un- housing, watching, ship- ping, loading, and de- livering of such goods and for other work to be performed in respect of them (124). Power to sell goods in default of paymeut of rates within certain periods, and to defray charges and ex- penses out of proceeds. If goods liable to duties, rates, &c., have been re- moved from the com- pany’s premises without payment, the company may, after paying cus- toms, duties, distrain other goods in its pre- mises belonging to the person liable, sell the goods so distrained and defray rates and duties out of the proceeds (126). Copy of ithe manifest of ships enter- ing the docks to be delivered to the company at their principal office (149). Power of dock- master to order the removal of combustibles, when necessary (172) Power to take rates on; Power to take rates on goods entering the docks (106). Power to recover rates on goods (107). Copy of the manifest of all vessels entering the docks to be delivered to the company (109). Power to land and ware- house goods in case of neglect of entry at the Custom House within seven days of the vessel being reported (114). Power to enter goods at the Custom House when owners of goods refuse or neglect to pass them within 48 hours of the vessel being reported at the Customs (116). Power to authorise per- sons to discharge cargoes (117). Power of dock- master to order removal of combustibles when necessary (133). 12 Synopsis of the Powers granted to the Company. 1 St. Katha- rine Docks West India Docks St. Katha- rine Docks West India Docks St. Katha- rine’s Docks Date of Act. 2) 10 Geo. IV., cap. 1. [1829] 10 Geo. IV., cap. Ixvii. [1829] 11 Geo. IV., cap. Xlil. [1830] 1 & 2 Will. IV.,cap. li. [1831] 2. Wall. Vil. cap. xlix. [1832] Works authorised. Completion and extension of docks and works (preamble) Completion of works previously autho- rised (preamble) Building all necessary piers within the tideway of the Thames at the dock entrances (45) Construction of cuts, sluices, bridges, and other works (46) Construction of drains for carrying off water from private property (47) Alteration and construction of sewers (48) Construction of draw and swivel bridges (54) Alteration and diversion of highways (55) Construction of feeders for supplying the docks with water (68) Capital Authorised. 500,000 300,000 ecevce eeeeee River Thames, 5 eeeece eeteoe Power to build and main- tain piers in the Thames at the entrance of the docks at Blackwall and Limehouse Hole (46). Dockmaster’s powers to extend to that part of the Thames within 200 yards from any entrance except the Limehouse entrance into the South West India Dock, where his power shall only extend 150 yards from the centre of the en- trance (100) erecve London Dock Companies—continued. Table 1—continued. 15 Powers granted as to Port. Navigation. 7 Shipping. 8 Commerce, 9 Power to assign rates as security on loans (2) Power to assign rates as security on loans (2) Power to assign rates as security on loans (5) Power to make bye-laws for governing the con- cerns of the company (22). Power to assign the rates as security for loans (40). Power of directors to make rules and regulations for the regulating of the com- pany’s business and works (96) erreee ereere Power to supply docks, &c., with water from the Thames, and to make feeders, &c.,for that pur- pose (68). Power to scour the docks and re- move wrecks and other obstructions at the ex- pense of the person caus- ing that obstruction (70). Power to scour the bed of the river and preserve the depth at the entrance of the docks, so as to en- able vessels to enter (73). Power to prevent vessel breaking bulk until the whole cargo has_ been entered at the Custom House (12) Power to take reasonable rates for all vessels entering the docks (76). Power to take a reason- able rate, rent, or sum for every lighter, &c., usin the docks and basins, not cxceeding the rates payable by vessels trading coastwise (76). Power to detain vessels and their effects on non- payment of charges (77). Power to prevent vessels breaking bulk until cargo is entered at the Custom House (93). Power to employ persons to discharge or load vessels at the expense of the owners or consignees when incon- venience or unnecessary delay in their discharge occurs from the inadequacy or improper conduct of the persons employed by the owners, masters, &c. ; masters to clear the decks of vessels of any impedi- ment to the delivery (94). Power of dockmaster to direct the movement of all vessels using the docks, to regulate the times of opening and shutting lock gates, and, on failure of masters, &c., of vessels to carry out his directions, to order his assistants to do so at the owner’s expense (100). Power of dock- master to remove all vessels lying within 150 yards of the Limehouse entrance to the South West India Dock, or within 200 yards of the other dock entrances, unless for the purpose of coming in or going out of the docks, on refusal of masters to do so; this provision not to apply to vessels loading or unloading at wharves within 100 yards of the entrances of the Hast India Docks,but vessels lying at such wharves not to obstruct the entrances, and to be removed when required by dockmaster (101). No vessel except those using the docks to lie at the buoys, &c., of the company in the Thames, except with the special permission of one of the dock- masters (102). Power of dockmaster to direct the dismantling, &c., of vessels entering the docks, inorder to avoid damage to shipping, &c., and to fix amount of ballast requisite to be taken on board (104). Power of dockmaster or his assistants to remove from the quays and wharves any vessel which has com- pleted discharging, and to order such vessel out of the docks, basins, &c.; if the master, &c., of any such vessel refuse, the dockmaster to remove it at the owner’s expense (106). Power of dockmaster to require, by notice in writing to the owner, the removal of any lighter or craft at the expiration of twenty-four hours after its entry into the docks, &c., or after it has completed unloading (107) Power to enter goods if not entered by owners or con- signees thereof (10) Power to land and ware- house goods in case of neglect of entry at the Custom House within seven days of the vessel being reported (13) Two copies of the manifest of ships entering the docks to be delivered to the company at the dock- house (84). Power to land and warehouse goods not duly entered at the Customs within seven days after the vessel has been reported at the Customs (90). Power to enter goods when obstruction of busi- ness is caused by the failure of the owner or consignee to enter them within 48 hours after the cargo has been reported at the Custom House, to land and warehouse such goods, and retain them as security for payment of freight, rates, duties, &c. (91). Power to take reasonable rates, rents or sums on all goods for wharfage, unshipping, landing,relanding,piling, housing, weighing, coop- ering,sampling, unpiling, unhousing, watching, shipping, loading, and delivering of such goods, and for other work to be performed in respect of them (80). Power to sell goods in default of payment of rates within certain periods, and to defray charges and ex- penses out of proceeds (81). Power of dock- master to order the re- moval of combustibles when necessary (109) 14 Synopsis of the Powers granted to the Name f ital ‘ of Date of Act. Works authorised. A eae ck esas River Thames. i 2 3 4 5 £ Hast India|5 & 6 Will. | Subscription from time to time towards 200,000 Soiee eee Betas Docks IV., cap. the making, repairing, improving and xliv. maintaining of any rail, tram, or [1835]. other roads within five miles of the docks (17). Purchase of lands, &c., not exceeding 10 acres near to the docks (19). Purchase of warehouses or of property to convert into warehouses within five miles of the Royal Exchange (20). St. Katha- 6 & 7 Will. | Completion and improvement of works| 900,000 | 9 wus rine Docks] IV., cap. previously authorised (3). XXxl. Purchase of warehouses within 5 miles [1836] of Royal Exchange (20) East and L Vat. hae tee ER a ens... || ener e Rice West India| Cap. ix. Docks [1838] East and 10 & LL "Vite tis eae ee a i sn 3 poh ntenek West India| cap. clvi. Docks. [1847 | London Dock Companies—continued. Table 1—continued. aaa z Powers granted as to ET Ns amy Tem |S a em Navigation. Shipping. 8 Commerce. 9 Power to assign the rates as security on loans (8). Power to purchase, hire or take on lease for any term or terms of years any warehouses, messuages, &c., within five miles of the Royal Exchange, which before or at the passing of this Act were the property of the East India Company; if the warehouses are licensed as bonding warehouses they may be used accordingly (20-1). Power to give security required for bonding warehouses (22). Power of directors to make rules and regulations for the management of the up-town warehouses mentioned in sections 20 and 21 of this Act, for the conveying and warehousing, &., of goods thereto or therein, the hours during which the warehouses are to be opened, &c. (24). Power of directors, or any three or more of them, to lease for any term of years or to sell the docks and warehouses of the company (389). Power to assign rates as security on loans (14). Power to purchase or take on lease warehouses or ground for the purpose of building warehouses for the deposit of goods within 5 miles of the Royal Exchange (20). Warehouses authorised to be built or purchased under this Act, to be used as bonded warehouses if licensed by Treasury or Customs; power to give to Treasury or Customs security required for such bonded warehouses (21-2) accustom eo) 8 - | |i "— vwves0ee Power to lease certain warehouses and wharves situated on the river Lea, in the parish of Bromley, to the Eastern Counties (now the Great. Eastern) Railway Com- pany (27) eeeeee Power to prevent vessels breaking bulk until cargo is entered at the Custom House subject to the Customs officers being permitted to discharge parts of cargoes when they think fit (31). Power to employ persons to dis- charge or load vessels at the expense of the owners or consignees when in- convenienced or unneces- sary delay in their dis- charge occurs from the inadequacy or improper conduct of the persons employed by the owners, masters, d&c.; masters to clear the decks of vessels of any impediment to the delivery (35). Power to cause goods to be conveyed to or from the company’s up-town warehouses (23). Power to take rates not exceed- ing those usually paid in the Port of London on goods conveyed to or from or deposited in the up-town warehouses, for housing, weighing, coop- ering, sampling, unhous- ing, watching, carrying and delivering, &c., such goods (25). Power to sell goods deposited, &c., in the up-town ware- houses in default of pay- ment of rates, and to defray such rates and the expenses of sale out of proceeds (26). Power to enter goods when obstruction of business is caused by the failure of the owner or consignee to enter them within 48 hours after the cargo has been reported at the Custom House, to land and warehouse such goods, and retain them as security for payment of freight, rates, duties, &c.; such goods may be detained until production of bill of lading (33). Power to land and warehouse goods not duly entered at the Customs within seven days after the vessel has been re- ported at the Customs. Power to sell the goods and defray all duties, charges, &c., out of the proceeds (34). Power to take rates, rents, or sums on goods deposi- ted in the warehouses authorised to be built or purchased by this Act (20). Power to cause goods to be conveyed to or from the company’s warehouses (23) ereeere 16 Synopsis of the Powers granted to the Name : of Date of Act. Company. 1 2 Victoria Docks cap. li. [1850] Commercial | 14&15 Vict., Docks cap. xliii. [1851 | London 16 &17 Vict., Docks | cap. evi. [1853]. Works authorised. 8 18 &14 Vict.,| Construction of dock with cuts, locks, quays, bridges and other works (18) Purchase of land for grazing purposes (for foreign cattle) not to exceed 200 acres (21) Construction of railway bridge over the entrance to the dock (29) Construction of station for North Wool- wich Railway ; expense not to exceed £1,500 (37) Purchase of land of the Northumberland and Durham Coal Company (39) Purchase of the Hast Country Dock and warehouses, &c. (6) Construction of works :—Two new cuts or entrances from the Thames; enlarge- mentand deepening of the Hast Country Dock and entrance; a tramway to con- nect the company’s docks with Dept- ford branch railway (17) Construction of swivel bridges over the new cuts or entrances and of a foot- way over one dock gate at each en- trance (19) Purchase of additional land not exceed- ing 20 acres (26) Construction of gas and water culverts under the new entrances (39) Inclosure of docks within a wall (41) Construction of a new entrance near Shadwell Dock stairs and a new basin or dock, connected by a cut with the Eastern Dock, with all necessary locks, gates, streets, piers, warehouses, sheds, and other works (4) Construction of two bridges over the new entrance and cut (8) Alteration and diversion of sewers in- terfering with docks (9) Stopping up and enclosing certain streets (10) Construction of new streets in place of | portions stopped up (11) Reconstruction of mains and pipes for Kast London Waterworks Company (14) Purchase of lands, buildings, &c., for purposes of the undertaking (18, 22). Construction of bridges, platforms, cranes, wharves, piers and other re- quisites, and laying down of buoys, dolphins, mooring posts, &., in the Thames (26) Capital Authorised. River Thames. 4 5 £ 533,000 Power of the dock-master to extend to 100 yards into the river from the entrance to the docks (45) 428,250 | Power of dock master to extend to 100 yards into the Thames from the entrance gates to the docks (30) 500,000 Power to build piers with- in the tideway of the Thames near the en- trances to the company’s docks, such piers not to project more than 30 feet from the bank of the river nor to injure the navigation of the river (7). The limits of the power of the dock master to be those prescribed in section 126 of 9 Geo. IV., cap. CXvl., and an ad- ditional space to the south-eastward of the Shadwell new entrance; such space to be bounded on the north-west by the high-water shore of the Thames for 300 feet measured from the point where the centre line of the entrance lock inter- sects the present shore line, on the north-east by a line extending from the limit of the north- western boundary and at right angles to it for a length of 600 feet, on the south-east by a line drawn from the eastern extremity of the north- eastern boundary in a direct line to the south- eastern limit of the boundary line of the Shadwell old entrance as determined by the above-mentioned Act, and on the south-west by the said boundary line (56) London Dock Companies—continued. Table 1—continued. 17 LL a SSS Powers granted as to Navigation, Shipping. 8 Commerce. 9 eeeane (18) Power to assign rates as | Power to scour the bed of security on loans (34) the river and preserve the depths at the en- trances of the docks (7). Company to lay down buoys, dolphins, &c., in the Thames near the entrances to the docks (26) shipping entering the dock (42) shipping entering the docks (42) Power. of dock master to order the removal of lighters or vessels out of the docks (48-9). Power to detain vessels until expenses are paid (53) Power to take rates on| Power to take rates on certain goods entering the company’s premises (43) Power to take rates for the use of cranes, weighing ma- chines, &c. (44) Power to scour and deepen | Power to take rates on| Power to take rates on the bed of the river at the entrance to the docks certain goods entering the company’s premises, and also for the use of cranes, weighing ma- chines, &c. (42) Power of dock master to order removal of com- bustibles when neces- sary(51). Powerto enter goods at the Custom House when owners of goods refuse or neglect to do so within 48 hours of the vessel being re- ported at the Custom House (55) 18 Synopsis of the Powers granted to the rene aa eaaeaaaaaaaacaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaacaaaammaamcacaal Name ital of Date of Act. Works authorised. ee: Company. River Thames. i 2 8 4 5 £ Victoria 16 and 17 |Alterationof works previously authorised, |.. 666,000 | Power of .the. dockmaster Docks Vict., cap. | and construction of additional docks, to extend yards into the CXXXl. with cuts, entrances and other works Thames from the en- [1853] on the east side of the dock authorised trances into the docks . || 3) | (46) Conversion of eastern cut between the dock and entrance into docks, ponds and other works (23) Construction of timber ponds, basins, slips, graving docks, wharves, quays, tramways, warehouses and _ other works (28) Purchase of lands and buildings called the Steelyard Estate for use as ware- houses (31) Grand Sur-|18 and 19 Construction of a canal and branches in 302,100 | Power of the dockmaster rey Canal} Vict., cap.| Rotherhithe, Deptford and Camber- in the Thames to extend and Docks | cxxxiv. well, and a basin with an entrance to within a radius of 150 [1855 ] the Thames (under previous Acts) yards from the dock Purchase of land for purposes of the 199,000 entrances (91) undertaking (54-56) ' Construction of a cut, entrance, or lock from the Thames to the outer dock or basin of the company (61) Widening, altering, and raising part of Rotherhithe-street (61, 76) Widening, deepening, and extending the south-western arm of the outer dock, and removing the communication between the outer dock and the timber pond (61) Construction of four docks or ponds with five cuts or entrances (61) Improvement of the communication between the north-eastern arm of the outer dock and the inner dock (61) Construction of a road and bridge from Lower Deptford-road to the docks (61) Widening and improving bridge over the King’s mill stream (61) Filling-up, arching over and diverting parts of the King’s mill stream (61) Construction of embankments, wharves, quays, jetties, sluices, drains, ware- houses, dolphins and other works (61) Construction of stairs in heu of Surrey Canal Stairs (65) Construction of bridges and footways over the entrances, &c. (66-68) Widening of platforms or footways over the dock gates (73) Construction of gas and water culverts under the new entrance from the Thames (79) London 19 Vict., Completion of works authorised under 200,000 samy aerate linea Docks | cap. i. 16 & 17 Vict., cap. evi. ( preamble) [1856 ] Victoria 20&21 Vict., | Construction of a cut and entrance into| 400,000 | Power of dockmaster to Docks | cap. lxxxiii.| the Thames, out of the eastern cut ‘| extend into the Thames [1857 | authorised, in East Ham and Wool- to a distance of 100 yards wich (6) from the point at which Imbanking and deepening the Thames a straight line drawn near the intended entrance (6) through the centre of Construction of locks, gates, bridges, the entrance lock would wharves, quays, jetties, sidings, moor- intersect a straight line ings and other works (6) drawn from the outer Alteration of roads and sewers inter- point of one of the jet- fering with works (9, 19-21) ties at the outer side of Provision of main encasing the Hast the dock entrance to the London Waterworks Company’s main outer point of the other (22) (29) | | Purchase of land not exceeding 3 acres with buildings thereon (31) London Dock Companies—continued. Port. Power to purchase or hire warehouses in the City of London (31). Power to give to Treasury or Cus- toms security required for bonded. warehouses not within the walls of the dock (35). Ware- houses provided under this Act may be used as bonded warehouses if licensed as such by Treasury or Customs. Power to make rules and regulations for the man- agement of their ware- houses (39). Power to make emigrant homes of warehouses (55). Power to lease undertaking to certain persons for a term of years (88) Power to supply water within a distance of 1,500 yards from any part of the company’s premises for trade purposes (131) Power to assign the rates as security on loans (3) Warehouses provided un- Treasury or der this Act may be used as bonded warehouses if licensed as such by Customs (33). Power to lease the undertaking to a joint stock company, &c. (42) Powers granted as to Navigation. Power to remove wrecks at the expense of the owners (96) the Thames for the use of the dock (8) Shipping. 8 Power to establish vessels for conveying goods be- tween docks and ware- houses (33). Power to take rates on vessels entering the docks (41). Power to take rates for the use of the graving dock, slips, &e. (44) Power of dockmaster to order the removal of light vessels from the docks (95). Power to take rates on vessels using the docks (108 and 113) Power to take water from | Power to provide vessels for conveying goods be- tween docks and ware- houses (87) Table 1—continued. 19 Commerce. 9 Power to cause goods to be conveyed to and from warehouses and docks (36). Power to enter goods at the Custom House when owners of goods refuse or neglect to do so within 48 hours of the vessel being re- ported at the Custom House (37). Power to take rates on certain goods entering the docks (42). Power to take rates forthe useof cranes, weighing machines, &c. (43). Power to detain goods until charges are paid or deposits on same are made (51) Power to take rates on certain goods entering the docks (109 & 111). Power to take rates for the use of cranes and weighing machines (129) aeneee Power to take reasonable rents and charges for goods deposited in the warehcuses provided un- der th2 authority of this Act (32). Power to take rates on goods entering the c)mpanies’ premises (39) -20 Synopsis of the Powers granted to the em Name ; jae Date of Act. Works authorised. ee River Thames. 1 2 3 t 5 £ London 21 Vict., Completion of works authorised under 300,000 iranse Docks | cap. xxxv. | 16 &17 Vict., cap. evi. (preamble) | [1858] | Victoria 22 Vict., Completion of certain works (2) Ren es se 5 ee Docks | cap. xxix. fe [1859] Commercial 4 22; Viétye| Fo “gel ee ee... «|| ae ae Dock cap. Xxx. [1859] Commercial | 23 Vict.,cap.| Purchase of properties in parish of St.| 9 ....., | swe Dock XE, Mary, Rotherhithe (4) [1860] Diversion of a footpath from Russell- street to London-street (16) Purchase of lands (17) | Construction of sewage culvert under | one of the new entrances (22) Grand Surrey| 23 Vict.,cap.| Purchase of land for purposes of the 99,000 | Power of dock master in Canal and| Ixxiv. undertaking (22-25) _ the Thames to extend Docks [1860] Construction of two docks or ponds with within a radius of 150 five cuts or entrances and of embank- yards from the entrance ments, wharves, quays, sheds, sluices, to the docks (38) sewers, and other works (26) Surrey Com- | 27 Vict.,cap.| Purchase of lands for purposes of the 614,000 | Power of dock master in mercial XXKE. undertaking (46-48) the Thames to extend to Docks (1864) Deepening upper dock of Surrey Docks 150 yards from each and wharfing the eastern side thereof dock entrance, such dis- (53) tance to be measured in Embanking and filling in parts of Com- each case from the point mercial Docks Nos. 4 and 5, widening where the central line of them on the east and deepening them the entrance lock inter- (53) sects the river front of Construction of a new entrance or lock the wing walls of the between the Upper Surrey Dock and entrance (81) Commercial Dock No. 5 (53) Construction of new gateway between Commercial Docks Nos. 3 and 4, and the filling in of the existing gateway (53) Widening and deepening Commercial Dock No. 3 (53) Construction of embankments, wharves, quays, ponds, basins, warehouses and other works (60) Construction of swing bridge in lieu of bridge No. 2 (69) Construction of movable bridges for foot passengers over upper and lower - entrances to Surrey Docks (70) London Dock Companies—-continued. Table 1—continued. 21 ‘Power to make bye-laws, rules, and regulations for governing the concerns of the company, and for - regulating the conduct of persons who enter, * remain, or are employed in orabout the works (90) Power to supply water, for trade purposes only, from the Company’s pre- mises to any persons within a distance of 1,500 yards from any part of the works, and to take such rates as may be agreed upon (118) Powers granted as to Navigation. | Shipping. 7 8 Commerce. 9 averse 7 i ee Eel lm ll owas Aeiecee sp er er eke eee a 80° 0" 8018 No vessel to be moored in the river within the limits of the dockmaster’s authority; dockmaster to have power to remove such vessels; vessels may, however, lie at wharves within those limits (81). Power to raise sunken vessels on default of masters, and to detain such vessels and their cargoes until expenses are paid by owners or masters (84). Vessels not to use the canal at other than the time specified, without the consent of the company (89). Power to take rates on vessels using the docks not exceeding those specified in schedule C of this Act (101). Power to take rates on vessels using the canal and passing in or out of the locks communicating with the Thames (106). Masters or persons in charge of vessels navigating the canal to give an account of the lading of their vessels to the proper officers of the company (109). Power to scour the bed and shore of the river and preserve the depth at the entrances to the docks so as to enable vessels to enter (57). Power to take water from the Thames for the use of the docks (60) belonging to the consignee or person making default on vessels entering or using the company’s premises (111). Power to detain and weigh |. vessels and goods in case of dispute between master |, and company as to weight, &c., of goods; expenses |, of weighing to be paid by the party in error (110). | Power to detain vessels and their cargoes for non- | payment of rates, and to detain any other goods | Power to detain goods on account of freight or until a deposit has been made (1) ore eee Power to exclude danger- ous articles from the company’s works (88). Power to take rates on all goodsincludedin schedule D of this Act, shipped, landed, received, or de- livered at the docks, not exceeding those mention- ed in the schedule, and to take rates on other goods not exceeding those charged by other dock eompanies in the port of London (102, 104-5). Power to take rates for the conveyance of animals and goods on the canal not exceeding those specified (103-5). Power to take additional rates on goods remaining on canal wharves more than 24 hours, or to order the removal of goods after the expiration of 24 hours (107). Power to detain and weigh goods in case of dispute as to their weight between master of vessel convey- ing them and the Com- pany (110). Power to detain goods for non- payment of rates; pay- ment to be recoverable by distress if not made within five days of seizure (111). Power to take reasonable rates for the use of warehouses, cranes, and weighing and measur- ing machines (116). 22 Synopsis of the Powers granted to the EE cael Name Capital of Date of Act. Works authorised, ei avisad, Company. River Thames. 1 2 3 4 5 £& London and . |. 27. &28 Vict.,| Construction of opening or gatewayfrom |... 570,000 | 9 a. A St. Katha- | cap.clxxviii.| Old Gravel-lane into the dock premises rine Docks | [1864] (25) A. ees Purchase of land for purposes of the |. undertaking (95) Completion of works of the three amal- gamated companies (98) Londen Dock Companies—continued. Table 1—continwe. Port. Power to make bye-laws for managing the con- cerns of the company (113). Power to agree with the Great Eastern, London and North West- ern, North London, Great Northern, Midland and Great Western Railway Companies, as to the use by the railway com- panies, of the dock com- pany’s works, the above railway companies to use the railways, tramways, and other conveniences of the London and Vic- toria Docks free of charge but subject to the dock company’s rules and regulations ; space to be provided for these rail- way companies (except the Great Eastern) for erection of offices, &c., at the Victoria Docks(146-7) Powers granted as to Navigation. : Shipping. 8 Commerce. - 9 ae AP Power of dockmaster to direct the dismantling, &c., of vessels entering the docks in order to avoid damage to the shipping or to the company’s premises; to fix the amount of ballast requisite to be taken on board; to give directions as to mooring of vessels to buoys, &c., and to regulate the equipment, rigging, and lading of all vessels in the docks (100). Power of dockmaster to require by notice in writing to the owner, the removal of any lighter or craft at any time after 24 hours from its entry into the docks, and if any such lighter or craft is not removed with- in 24 hours after such notice, the dockmaster may remove it, at the owner’s or master’s expense (102). Power to prevent vessels breaking bulk until the cargo is entered at the Custom House, provided the consent of the principal revenue officer on duty at the docks is obtained (118). Power to employ per- sons to discharge or load vessels at the expense of the owners or consignees when inconvenience or un- necessary delay in their discharge occurs from the inadequacy or improper conduct of the persons em- ployed by the owners, masters, &c.; masters to clear the decks of vessels of any impediment to the deliy- ery (119). No vessel, except those using the docks, to lie at the buoys, &c., of the company in the Thames, except with the special permission of one of the dockmasters (122). Power to purchase, build, and maintain or hire vessels for conveying goods between or to or from the company’s docks and warehouses (131). Power to take for every lighter, &c., using the docks, a reasonable rate, rent or sum not exceeding that charged for vessels trading coast- wise (132). Power to take reasonable rates for ves- sels using company’s graving dock, patent slips, egridirons, &c. (137). Power to remit rates in respect of any vessels shown to the company’s satis- faction to have been wrecked, provided the claim is made within such time as the company think reason- able (140). Power to detain vessels until rates on them are paid (141) Power of dockmaster to order the removal of combustibles when ne- cessary (103). Power to give certificates of deposited goods and war- rants for delivery of goods (106). Power to cause a warehousing entry to be made for goods when obstruction of business is occasioned by the failure of the owner or consignee to enter them within 48 hours after the cargo has been reported at the Cus- tom House; expenses con- nected with such entry to be recoverable from owner or consignee (111), Power to examine goods on board vessels in the docks at the request of the master, owner, or con- signeein order to ascertain damages occasioned to such goods by improper stowage or otherwise (127). Power to cause goods to be conveyed from one warehouse to another, eitherin thecom- pany’s premises or else- where (129). Power to make reasonable charges for the conveyance of goods between or to or from the company’s docks and warehouses (131). Power to take reasonable rates, rents or sums on animals or goods for wharfage, unshipping, landing, re- landing, piling, housing, weighing, coopering, sam- pling, unpiling, unhous- ing, watching, shipping, loading and delivery of such goods and for other work to be performed in respect of them, pro- vided that the import and export rates shall not exceed those specified in schedule 6 of this Act (134-5). Power to remit rates in respect of goods shown to the company’s satisfaction to have been wrecked, spoiled, damaged, or lessened in value from long stowage, provided the claim is made within such time as the company think reasonable (140). Power to detain and sell goods in default of payment of rates within certain periods after paying the customs and inland revenue duties thereon, and to defray freight, rates and expenses out of proceeds (142-5). Power to agree with the Great Eastern, London and North Western, North London, Great Northern, Midland, and Great Western Rail- way Companies as to charges tc be made for railway traffic using the docks, the making of through rates, and the facilities to be afforded to such traffic (146). graving docks, wharves, warehouses, rails, buoys, moorings, cranes, and other works (3, 4) Alteration of line and levels of Hast Ham Hall manorway and Woolwich manorway, and the construction of a swing bridge over the new dock (8) Embankment and deepening of the Thames (4) Construction of line of railway and tunnel in substitution of Great Hastern line taken up for dock purposes, and of swing bridge carrying road and rail over new dock (6) Construction of new road across Vic- toria Dock estate (7) Construction of works for supplying docks with water (14) 24 Synopsis of the Powers granted to the Saye Date of Act Works authorised. Capital q 1 . Company. er River Thames. 1 2 3 & 5 & Millwall 27 & 28 Vitc || Appropriation of lands for purposes of 680,000 | Power of the canal master Dock cap. ccly. the undertaking (19) appointed by the com- Company [1864] Construction of works: a canal from the pany to extend to all south of the entrance to Millwall Docks parts of the Thames to the north of Cubitt-town pier, with within 100 yards from one or more entrances from the the centre of the gate of Thames; a canal from this canal to the entrance from the the southern side of the timber dock ; river; but not so as to piers, graving docks, sluices, tram- interfere with the powers ways, wharves, keys and other works of the Conservators of (23-24) of the Thames within Deviation of roads and footways inter- those limits (69-70) fering with docks, construction of bridges, &c. (24, 42-5) Construction of works for the drainage of the company’s and adjoining lands (24) East and 28 Vict., Adding to and improving works (pre- Sa0/000 “AReen ett mene West India| cap. xxx. amble) Docks [1865 ] Millwall 29 & 30 Vict.,| Completion and alteration of works Go0,000 sienna ee Docks | cap.cccxxili.| authorised by 27 & 28 Vict., cap. cclv. [1866] (preamble) Millwall 33 & 34 Vict.,| Construction of the partof the Millwall} wn... fae Docks} cap. xx. Extension Railway passing through [1870] the Dock premises (9) East and 37 & 38 Vic., | Construction of slips and graving docks, 475,000 a AReeieerees cucu West India| cap. lix. and provision of increased accommoda- Docks [1874] tion for the shipping interest (pre- amble) London | 38 &39Vict.,) Construction of a dock in extension| ..,.. Powers of company and St. cap. cliii. eastwards of the Victoria Dock with to be Katharine [1875] an entrance and lock, and two piers or Docks. jetties, and all necessary locks, gates, . Power to embank the Thames near the dock and works (4) Power of harbour-master appointed by the com- pany to extend into the River Thames to a dis- tance of 300 yards from the company’s works on the river (13) London Docks Companies—continued. Port. Power to maintain, regu- late, work and improve the canals and works (62). Power to appro- priate parts of canals and works for the accom- modation of particular trades (64). Power to grant licences for the occupation and use of the company’s wharves, Powers granted as to Navigation. Shipping. 8 Table 1—continued. 25 Commerce. Power to scour and deepen | Power to limit time during | Power to remove goods, the bed or shore of the Thames and preserve the depth at the entrances to the docks (33). which vessels may re- main in canals, &c., or within the limits of the authority of the canal master (65). Power to take reasonable sums as tonnage rates, according to the tonnage or burden of the vessels, in respect of all vessels using the company’s canals, basins, cuts or entrances (76). Power to compound with masters or owners of vessels for tonnage rates, such compounding rates &c., causing obstructions on the quays, wharves and other works of the company, and to detain such goods, é&., until expenses of removal and detention are paid; pay- ment to be recoverable by distress if not made in seven days or if the owner of the goods can- quays, warehouses, build- ings, yards, &c. (73).| not to be preferential (80-1). Power to lease the| sonable rates on vessels using the wharves, quays, ware-| graving docks, patent slips, &. (82) Power to take rea- company’s not be found (66). Power to grant licences for the deposit of animals, goods, &ec., on any of the com- houses and buildings of the company for any period for purposes con- nected with the com- pany’s undertaking (74) SOU) er 0060 ECS eevee ff a #0 s0-¢ Power to lease any graving dock or dry dock be- longing to the company for any term not exceed- ing 21 years (10) Powers of dockmaster in relation to graving docks Pe pee tae same os. his |\—aae powers in relation to wet docks set out in 1 & 2 Will. IV., cap. lii. (14). Power to lease slips, dry docks, graving docks and other works for any term of years (16) een eee pany’s wharves, quays, yards or lands (73). Power to take reasonable sums as wharfage rates on animals, goods, &c., shipped, unshipped, transhipped, received or delivered at or from or on the company’s works, not exceeding the wharfage rates at the London and St. Katharine Docks (78). Power to compound with owner, con- signor or consignee of goods for wharfage rates, such compounding rates not to be preferential (80-1). Power to take reasonable rates on goods for shipping, unshipping, transhipping, landing, relanding, housing, unhousing, weighing, coopering, sampling, piling, unpiling, loading, unloading, receiving, delivering, repairing, protecting and watching such goods, and for any other services performed in respect to them (83). Power to detain and sell goods in default of payment of rates within certain periods after paying customs and inland revenue duties thereon, and to defray duties, freight, rates and expenses out of proceeds (86-7) Power to take reasonable ose eee aeeeee euemeree I iw Byars ae: Wesewe OO rates in respect of all SUES Lay COLE CeCe Os er using any graving docks which may hereafter be constructed (13). Provisions as to recovery of rates on vessels using the graving docks of the company from persons eluding the payment of such rates, to be the same as set out in 1 & 2 Will. IV., cap. lii., section 77 (14). in relation to the Royal Albert Dock, as to taking of rates on lighters and goods and all other purposes, the same as set out in 27 and 28 Vic., cap, elxxviil., subject to the provisions of this Act (12) Power to take water from the Thames for the dock and works (14). Power Company to maintain tun- nel and covered way in connection with the eae ee ee eo are Great Hastern Railway Company’s line in the dock premises, to main- tain in good working order to the satisfaction of the above railway company that portion of its line transferred to the dock company, and to set aside or allow the to scour, dredge, and deepen the bed or shore of the Thames near the dock and works, with the consent of the Conserva- tors, in order to improve the access to the dock (15) railway company to lay down free of charge sidings for the purposes of the dock traffic (6). Provisions as to the management and control of the Manor Way swing bridge (25). Company to maintain certain works in connection with the water mains of the East London Waterworks Company in the dock premises (28) 26 Synopsis of the Powers granted to the Name : Sat of Date of Act. Works authorised. Capita Company. Authorised. River Thames. 3 4 5 £ London | 41 Vict., cap | Completion of works authorised under} 800,000 | wesw and St. Xxil. 38 & 39 Vict., cap. clii., and other Katharine [1878] purposes of the undertaking (preamble) Docks Millwall 42 & 43 Vict.,| Completion of works previously author- 120,000. 20 a eee Docks | cap. Ixvii. ised (preamble) [1879] Purchase of lands, &c., in addition to those already held not exceeding in the whole 35 acres (14) East and 42 &43 Vict.,| Provision of increased accommodation 750,000 ieee area West India | cap. clxix. for the shipping interest (preamble) Docks [1879] Purchase of certain lands and buildings in the City of London and the parish of Poplar (4) London 45 Vict., Completion of works authorisea under 800,000 =e aReieeen: 9 0 eee and St. cap. li. 38 & 39 Vict., cap. cliii. (preamble) Katharine [1882] Docks Millwall 45 Vict., | Development of the undertaking (pre-| 383,300 | see. : Docks | cap. xxxvi. | amble) [1882] | Purchase of certain lands in Poplar (13) East and 45 & 46 Vict.| Construction of docks, &c., at Tilbury ;| 1,000,000 | The powers of the company West India cap. xc. one main dock, three branch docks, a Docks [1882] coaling dock, a lock, a tidal basin with Power to appropriate soil an entrance into the Thames, a river and material dredged wall, and two piers (5) from time to time from Deviation of main sewer in Little the Thames (12). Juris- Thurrock (5) diction of dockmaster Construction of locks, gates, bridges, in the river Thames to wharves, quays, rails, sidings, ware- extend to 250 yards from houses, buoys, moorings and other the southernmost points works (6) of each of the two piers Construction of works to supply Tilbury at the sides of the en- Docks with water (11) trance of the dock (380) Purchase of lands for works (13) London Dock Companies—continucd. Table 1—continued. 27 Powers granted as to Navigation. 7 capes « = 1 em ere'e ce. 6 Power to make agreements from time to time with the Hast an] West India and London and St. Katharine Dock Com- panies with reference to the interchange and ac- commodation of traffic entering and leaving or destined for the docks of the respective companies (18) Same 8 8 =6—6«« e060 ee Clee Power to maintain as a double line the rail- way between the North Woolwich branch of the Great Eastern Railway and Gallions Reach, together with stations and works, to lay down additional lines and construct additional works, and to use the railway for the conveyance of passengers, passengers’ luggage, and small parcels (14-5, 19, 21). Power to take tolls not exceeding those specified for the use of the railway and for the use of engines for propelling carriages (16-7). Company to run cheap trains for the labouring classes (23). Power to enter into agreement with the Great LHastern Railway Company as to traffic arrangements and the collection and appropriation of tolls, &c. (26) ereoee eatee eee fF | ~~~. — ‘ea cm¢ Shipping. 8 Commerce. 9 eee nee Power of dockmaster to place men on board of vessels in the company’s premises that are adrift or not properly secured at the owner’s expense (23) oeaeee eee eee . toms If goods liable to duties, rates, &c., have been removed from the com- pany’s premises without payment, the company may, after paying cus- duties, distrain other goods in its pre- mises belonging to the person liable, sell the goods so distrained and defray rates and duties out of the proceeds (22) Power to take fares on passengers and rates on small parcels conveyed on the railway, not ex- ceeding those specified ; such fares to apply to ordinary and express trains but not to special trains (16, 19, 22, 27). oreeae under previous Acts to apply| to the Tilbwry Dock subject |to the provisions of this Act |(4) ae with water from the Thames, &c. (11) Power to supply docks | Tonnage dues on barges, lighters, &c., not to exceed the rate, rent or sum charged in respect of vessels trading coast- wise (26). Power totake reasonable rates for the use of the graving docks (28) Power to take rates, rents or sums on animals and goods not exceeding those specified in Parts II. and III. of the schedule of this Act, for wharfage, unshipping, landing, re- landing, piling, housing, weighing, coopering, sampling, unpiling, un- housing, watching, ship- ping, loading and de- livering of such animals or goods, and for other work to be performed in respect of them (27) 28 Synopsis of the Powers granted to the Name Capital of Date of Act. Works authorised. We orised: Company. River Thames, ] 2 3 4 5 £& Basted West | 46 Vict caps |i) okt ae, canes er ee nec 4, MPM Nish India Docks Xxx1x, [1883] London 47 Vict.,cap. | Construction of additional entrance to| —...... Power to build piers in the and St. xv. [1884] } Royal Albert Dock with two piers or Thames near the en- Katharine jetties, and of gates, sluices, quays, trance to the docks (4). Docks tramways, wharves, warehouses, jet- Power of harbour-master ties, mooring posts, and other works appointed by the com- (4, 5). Construction of two sewage pany to extend into the culverts under the entrance (20) River Thames to a dis- tance of 300 yards from | the company’s works on the river (25) Kast & West | 49 Vict., Completion of Tilbury Docks and pro-| 1,000,000 | ...... India Docks} cap. xxvi. vision of warehouses, quays, sheds, and [1886] other accommodation (preamble) Millwall 50 Vict., Development of the undertaking (pre- 200,000 {) ee er coe Docks | cap. xxvil. | amble) [1887 } London & 51 & 52 Vict.|, Completion of works in the London 200,000 . eater coe India Docks} cap. cxliii. | and St. Katharine Docks previously [1888] authorised (4) London Dock Companies—continwed. aie Port. 6 Confirmation of an agree- ment between the London, Tilbury and Southend Railway Company and the Hast and West India Dock Company, by which the railway company allow the dock company to take a supply of water from their premises for the use of the dock com- pany (2). Power to con- struct and maintain mains, pipes, and other works necessary for sup- plying the water (3). Power to make bye-laws with respect to the ser- vice and supply of water to the shipping (5). Power to supply water to houses on dock lands, and to houses within the area of supply of the South Essex Water- works Company with the consent of that company Ci): Power to make and main- tain a second entrance to the dock from the Thames at Gallions Reach, two piers near the entrance, and all the necessary gates, quays, wharves, ware- houses, buoys, and other works in _ connection with such entrance Power to provide and maintain hotels (16) The powers and duties of the two companies under all Acts relating to the maintenance and man- agement of the undertak- ings, the appointment of the officers and servants necessary for such man- agement, the execution of works and the supply of working plantandrolling stock, to be vested in the Joint Committee (31) Powers granted as to Navigation. 7 Power to lay down buoys, dolphins, &., in the Thames near the en- trance to the Docks (5). Power to take water from the Thames for the dock and works (23). Power to scour, dredge, and deepen the bed or shore of the Thames near the dock and works, with the consent of the Conservators, in order to improve the access to the dock (24) oeoere eresee Shipping. 8 Power to supply water to the shipping in the docks at a reasonable rate (4) eer ero the London and St. Katharine and East and West India Dock Com- panies relating to the fixing, collecting, and enforcing payment of rates and charges on shipping to be vested in the Joint Committee (31) Power to take in respect of any vessel using any of the docks, &c., under the management of the Joint Committee a rea- sonable rate, rent or sum for every ton according to the registered tonnage of the vessel, not exceed- ing the rates, &c., speci- fied in part 1 of the schedule to 45 & 46 Vict., cap. xc. (57) Table 1—continued. 29 Commerce. The powers and duties of | The powers and duties of the London and _ St. Katharine and Kast and West India Dock Com- panies relating to the fixing, collecting and enforcing payment of rates and charges on goods to be vested in the Joint Committee (31) 30 Synopsis of the Powers granted to the Name aR F of Date of Act. Works authorised. ee =A gies River Thames. 1 2 3 4 5 £ Surrey Com- | 57 &58 Vict.,) Alteration and extension of Greenland 375,000 | Power of dockmaster in mercial cap. Ixvli. Dock, and construction of new lock the Thames to extend Docks (1894 ] and entrance thereto, and of passage to 150 yards from each to Canada Dock (4) dock entrance, such dis- Extension of Russia Dock, and construc- tance to be measured in tion of communication passage to each case from the point Greenland Dock (4) where the central line of Construction of new canal locks and the entrance lock inter- entrance from Greenland Dock to sects the river front of Surrey Canal, and the formation of a the wing walls of the basin by widening the canal (4) entrance (33) Shortening at the southern ends thereof of the Canada and Quebec ponds (4) Construction of new road and sewer, and raising and altering the levels of Swing-bridge-road (4) Diversion of footpath crossing Greenland entrance lock (4) Construction of new road from the junc- tion of Grove-street with London-road to the junction of Yeoman-street with Plough-road (4) Construction of embankments, quays, jetties, warehouses, landing places, buoys, slips and other works (4) Purchase of additional lands (24) 5 De tas Table 1—continued. London Dock Companies—continued. 31 Powers granted as to Port. Navigation. Shipping. Commerce. 6 7 8 9 ci Power to scour the bed ecards and shore of the river and preserve the depth at the entrances to the docks so as to enable vessels to enter (10). Power. to take water from the Thames for the use of the docks (11). ™M = bd ed 4 1 756 | 1865 1866 28 29 3 a 1 784 | 1866 1867 26 94 | 9 = 1 834 | 1867 1868 34 25 2, <2 unt 862 | 1868 1869 15 14| 2 die 1 810 | 1869 1870 35 97 | 2 1 2 985 | 1870 2,500 to 3,000 1871 19 24 6 3 1,066 | 1871 1872 24 30 8 6 | 1,864 | 1872 1873 22 18 17 7 1,479 | 18738 1874 25 20 24 8 1,597 | 1874 1875 13 18 25 8 1,465 | 1875 1876 9 12 26 8 1,489 | 1876 1877 8 14 28 7 1,640 | 1877 1878 14 15 30 7 1,820 | 1878 1879 16 9 34 9 2.027 | 1879 1880 10 16 34 10 2.293 | 1880 1881 12 92 47 16 2.546 | 1881 1882 21 16 62 21 2.626 | 1882 1883 17 18 75 24 3,047 | 1883 1884 20 18 85 | 30 3,059 | 1884 1885 19 12 87 32 3,098 | 1885 1886 14 74 90 32 3,018 | 1886 1887 24 13 92 36 3.063 | 1887 1888 22, 17 98 40 3,284 | 1888 1889 22 25 108 44 3,484 | 1889 1890 18 15| 129 51 3.601 | 1890 1891 13 11 139 74 3,632 | 1891 1892 8 14) 147 96 3,577 | 1892 1893 13 12 | 163 115 3,569 | 1893 2,600 | 2,800 | 3,000 | 3,500 | Over 0 2,800 | to 3,000 | to 3,500| to4,000 | 4,000 1894 10 8| 86 46 90 32 19 | 3,601 | 1894 1895 12 11| 85 58 | 108 39 26 | 3,661 | 1895 1896 18 8| 80 67 | 107 49 86 | 3,701 | 1896 1897 6 10| 88 66 | 119 56 45 | 3619 | 1897 1898 6 10} 98 74 | 124 66 66 | 8,677 | 1898 1899 3 11) 108 77 | 184 70 98 | 3,665 | 1899 36 Table 6. Classification according to Tonnage of the Steam Vessels engaged in Foreign Trade belonging to the United Kingdom, 1860 to 1899. [Registered under the Merchant Shipping Act, 1894,“ Trade and Navigation” (1860-70) and “ Navigation and Shipping” (1871-99) Returns. ] ee —————— en Number of STEAM Vessels of a Tonnage of Year. a — es — ae et, = _ os Under | 50 100 200 300 400 500 | 600 700 800 900 | 1,000 | 1,200 | 1,400 | 1,600 | 1,800 | 2,000 | 2,200 | 2,400 | 2,600 | 2,800 Over 50 | t0100 to 200 | to 300 | to 400 | to 500 | to 600 to 700 | to 800 | to 900 | to1,000| to1,200| to 1,400 t01,600/ to 1,800 | t0'2,000 to 2,200 | to 2,400 to 2,600 | to 2,800 | to 3,000 3,000 Total. | | | 1860 15 38 31 58 44 62 22 28 21 11 21 38 32 | 13 6 2 4 a as = = 1 447 1860 1861 12 24 40 61 46 65 31 24 28 12 24 39 85 | 17 11 3 4 = = — = 1 477 1861 1862 20 25 43 50 53 77 39 31 31 11 22, 40 28 | 16 15 3 4 1 — = == 1 510 1862 1863 26 27 62 50 54 85 39 34 31 15 24 44 81 | 28 18 2 4 1 3 =— —_ 1 574 1863 1864 21 31 82 80 68 94 57 47 40 24 26 49 43 | 82 20 4 4 1 1 1 2 = 727 1864 1865 26 27 67 69 65 89 81 51 36 25 34 64 47 31 24 7 5 1 2 a 4 1 756 1865 1866 28 22, 57 58 63 116 91 58 34 34 32 61 48 36 26 6 6 3 1 3 _ 1 784 1866 1867 26 24 56 59 64 117 110 48 43 38 32 71 56 44 24 12 6 4 2 2 = 1 834 1867 1868 34 25 41 49 73 125 105 57 53 44 37 71 56 | 41 24 12 7 5 1 2 = =— 862 1868 1869 15 14 26 56 44 118 99 64 48 53 46 76 50 40 27 17 8 4 2 2 — 1 810 1869 22 1870 35 27 30 57 57 107 93 78 67 63 60 76 56 47 35 12 8 5 2 1 2 935 1870 800 to 1,000 1,200 to 1,500 1,500 to 2,000 2,000 to 2,500 | 2,500 to 3,000 1871 19 24 28 43 58 124 92 91 89 144 101 119 94 36 > | 6 3 1,066 1871 1872 24 30 42 46 60 130 141 142 117 206 113 143 113 43 8 6 1,364 1872 1873 22, 18 32 39 53 144 148 1638 139 225 125 158 143 46 17 7 1,479 1873 1874 25 20 40 44 55 132 144 183 1438 250 142 167 165 5D 24 8 1,597 1874 1875 138 18 29 32 47 94 102 156 148 239 157 175 162 60 25 8 1,465 1875 1876 9 12 27 39 56 101 1038 157 139 256 162 178 154 62 26 8 1,489 1876 1877 8 14 26 33 56 133 118 173 162 265 198 196 155 68 28 7 1,640 1877 1878 14 15 29 35 59 136 125 189 160 312 232 230 176 71 30 7 1,820 1878 1879 16 9 42 47 82 149 142 193 159 361 264 258 189 78 34 9 2,027 1879 1880 10 16 27 59 90 171 158 200 187 426 300 322 191 97 34 10 2,298 1880 1881 12 22 37 66 96 157 155 204 209 455 348 393 215 114 47 16 2,546 1881 1882 21 16 40 53 70 123 125 168 204 485 409 438 261 130 62 21 2,626 1882 1883 17 18 31 67 94 162 153 195 271 527 475 492 308 1438 15 24 3,047 1883 1884 20 18 43 48 86 137 132 182 264 535 498 529 308 149 85 30 3,059 1884 1885 19 12 39 52 88 130 120 173 265 544 518 549 311 154 87 32 3,093 1885 1886 14 17 22 45 76 117 113 170 244 5B5 520 550 3138 160 90 32 3,018 1886 1887 24 13 15 51 67 111 111 179 242 517 515 567 345 178 92 36 3,063 1887 1888 22, 17 24 58 79 112 121 185 241 528 536 608 418 197 98 40 3,284 1888 1889 22 | 25 24 52 | 72 102 120 187 236 521 557 698 497 219 108 44 8,484 1889 1890 18 15 27 50 63 90 118 160 236 519 563 743 579 247 122 51 3,601 1890 1891 13 11 23 41 538 74 106 156 225 490 558 158 652 264 139 74 3,632 1891 1892 8 14 21 35 45 69 90 143 197 455 5BD 737 7038 282 147 96 3,577 1892 1893 13 12 18 35 48 62 83 130 193 422 | «509 | 724° 732 310 168 : seeks | 8,569 1893 | | 800 900 1,200 | 1,400 | 1,600 | 1,800 | 2,000 | 2,200 | 2,400 | 2,600 2,800 | 3,000 | 3,500 | Over | | | to 900 to 1,000 to 1,400 | to 1,600 to 1,800 to 2,000 to 2,200 to 2,400 | to 2,600 to 2,800 to 3,000 to 3,500 to4,000 | 4,000 — 1894 10 8 17 | 29 43 | 64 72 127 192 Q15 190 489 459 453 | 306 277 | 179 | 112 96 86 46 90 32 19 | 3,601 1894 1895 12 11 18 28 | 44 59 73 121 | 186 200 179 485 452 456 | 818 303 «181 | 127 102 85 58 103 39 26 | 3.661 1895 1896 18 8 25 39 19 56 74 113 181 191 165 452 | 484 445 | 888 325 201 | 145 108 || 80 67 107 | 49 86 | 3.701 1896 1897 6 10 1S ec 39 54 | 65 | 100 159 170 156 491 424 427 340 | B41 | O15 160 110 |} 88 | 66 | 119 | 56 | 45 8,619 1897 1898 6 10 | 22 40 45 | 54 | 68 | 91 | 144 157 141 | 389 | 410 418 350 371 234 182 122 98 74 124 | 66 66 | 3,677 | 1898 1899 3 11 28 30 | 387 | 44 65 | 82 187 146 124 | 368 | 888 395 | 339 370 253 222, 151 |{108 | 77 | 184 70 | 98 | 38,665 1899 | | . | | | | | | Ce aa Table 7. ydom, 1860 to 1899. g” (1871-99) Returns. | Year. | Year. Under 50 2.600 | 2.800 | 50 10|to2,800 to 3,000 Over 3,000 LOLs | | 1860 40 | 4 1 wa no 6,876 | 1860 1861 31 | a 2 Be = 6,902 | 1861 1862 58 | 49 1 3 2a 7,095 | 1862 1868 46. Paeae 9 as aK 7,360 | 1863 1864 31 | $84 1 as ae 7,557 | 1864 1865 29 | 2 2 os = 7,384 | 1865 1866 29 | 30 1 a os 7,454 | 1866 1867 32 | 30 9 fe a 7,467 | 1867 1868 20 : 8 a ee 7,306 | 1868 1869 9 | 99 1 a = 6,968 | 1869 1870 15 | 26 1 26 a 6,757 | 1870 2,500 to 8,000 1871 20 | 19 1 1 6,202 | 1871 1872 16 |e 1 1 6,091 | 1872 1878 8 ene ee 1 5,898 | 1878 1874 s | a 1 aes 6.613 | 1874 1875 9° oars 9 = 5,827 | 1875 1876 9 es 9 a 5,887 | 1876 1877 6. 1 abl 2 - 5,292 | 1877 1878 6 dae 9 oa 5.235 | 1878 1879 8 | 12 2 as 4881 | 1879 1880 7 bel 2 A) 4,518 | 1880 1881 123} 3 ee 4163 | 1881 1882 16 9 4 a 3.713 | 1882 1883 15) eal 6 ee 3,543 | 1888 1884 10 | 10 8 1 3.256 | 1884 1885 15 | 0 9 1 8,180 | 1885 1886 5 8 11 1 2.923 | 1886 1887 eat 8 10 1 2717 | 1887 1888 12 | 10 12 3 2665 | 1888 1889 8 9 17 3 2.484 | 1889 1890 12 20 2 2.995 | 1890 1891 7 29 3 2197 | 1891 1892 10 49 7 9.082 | 1892 2,600 | 2,800 | 3,000 | 3,500 | Over 0| to 2,800 | to 3,000 | to 3,500 to 4,000 4,000 18938 6 6 21 17 6 = ey 1.sote) 1898 1894 4 5 19 15 6 ee, — | 1,845 | 1894 1895 2 5 21 14 6 = 237 11.765 | 1895 1896 2 50) 21 14 6 a — | 1,686 | 1896 1897 3 43 \ 91 18 6 es — | 1534 | 1897 1898 ©) CO HeI02 COPD ODOR OOgd NOOO > ood AaNOrre 5 iS) oo oo ee) Table 8. Classification according to Tonnage of Vessels belonging to London and to certain other Ports in the United Kingdom, together with a Comparison of the Proportion that the Vessels belonging to London and to the other Ports bear to the Vessels belonging to all Ports in the United Kingdom, 1899 (as registered under the Merchant Shipping Act, 1894—‘“ Navigation and Shipping” Return, 1899). Sn SS eee UNITED KINGDOM. LONDON. LIVERPOOL. GLASGOW. GREENOCK. CLASSIFICATION Steam. Sailing. TOTAL, Steam. Sailing. TOTAL. Steam. Sailing. TOTAL. Steam. Sailing TOTAL. Toe Steam. | Sailing. z : ee — Se TOTAL. : ee , | a : Per- Per- Per- | Per- Per- Per- Per Per- Ber Per- NO. jcentage 0 Jo, centage o jcentage of centage of _ centage of] » centage of entage of sentage of rentage off tage of tage of we centage of 2 the United Ne. the United Ne |the United No, i United — the United Be. Ithe United Ne: the United the United No; ihe United No. ihe United No. tha Uiatted Ne: the United Kingdom. Kingdom | Kinedom. Kingdom Kingdom. | Kingdom, Kingdom. Kingdom. | Kingdom. Kingdom. Kingdom.| Kingdom. Zi i He = = | F | | | | Under 50 tons............ 2,524 | 5,547 | 8,071} 458 | 18-14 | 617 | 11-12 | 1,075 13°32 | 117 4°64 | 111 2:00 | 228 | 286] 282 9:19 96 1:73| 328] 4:10 44) 1:74 55 992} 99] 124 Cf 50 and under 100 ...| 1,854 3,316 4,670 89 6-57 | 887 | 11:66 | 476 | 10:19} 145 | 10-72) 465 | 1408 | 610) 13:06 | 118 874 | 88 1:00 | 151 3°24 5 “87 14 42 19d} UCN 200 ...| 682) 767 | 1,399] 113 | 17°88 | 70 9:13 | 183 | 13:09 76| 12-01 70 | 918] 146 | 10°44} 142) 22-47 6 ‘78,| 148 | 10°58 Ti a4 2 | -26 13 93 200 . 800... 275 | 144) 419 65 | 28-64 18 | 12:50 838 19°81 26 9-45 12>) 8:38 38 | 9:07] 62) 22°55 9 6:25 71 | 16°94 1 ‘36 2 1-89 3 "72 300 * 400...) 241) 48 289 bb) 21-154 6| 12:50 57 | 19°72 13 5-40 10] 2-01 23| 7:86 33 | 14:70 18 | 37:50 51 | 17°64 2 ‘83 = = 2 ‘69 400 500 ...| 256 | 45 | 301 56 | 21-87 | 8| 17°78 64 | 21:26 8 8-18 4 8:89 12| 4:00] 386| 14:06 21 | 46°70 57 | 18°94 3 1:12 — — 3 1:00 : | | | | 500 os 600 ...| 188 25 | 213 48 | 25°53 7 | 27-90 55 | 25:82 15 7:98 7 | 28:00 92! 10°34} 21] 11:18 4 | 16:00/| 25] 11°74 4 2:18 — = 4 1:90 600 9 700...) 161] 27| 188 32 | 19°87 U0) |) BAe 42 | 99:34 18 | 8:06 5 | 18:52 18| 957] 12 7:45 5 | 1852); 17 9:04 = = = = = 7p 800...| 176 | 60) 236 23 | 18-60 9 | 14:90] 82] 13:56 10 | 5:66 18 | 30:00 28 | 11:86) 12| 6:82 21) 35-00 33 | 14:00 == ae = as = = 800 5. 900... 168| 42]| 210 89 | 28-22 2 475 41) 19°52 12 T15 17 | 40:50 29 | 13:80] 18} 10-72 10 | 23:80; 28 | 13°34 — -- — — _ = , 900 eee OOO eee SL | 7|\ 178 3 26:72 4 8:51 39 | 21:90 17 | 12:98 11 | 23-40 281 15°74] 20) 15:26 19 | 40:40} 89 | 21°90 — — = | | | ! | { 1,000 ,», 1,200...) 3851) 107) 458 84 | 238-98 8 747 | 921! 20:90 88 | 10:82] 389] 86:50 77| 1682) 46] 13:10 81 | 29-00) 77 | 16°82 yy || asl 4) 38:74 || GIRS HI 1,200 pet 400r i esbonl 2650) O26 99 | 27-27 20 | 12:27 | 119 | 29-63 44) 12:12] 46] 28-20 90| 17-28 | 386) 9:92) 48] 26-40 79 | 15°16 —| — 9 5°52 |) alae 1,400 Peet Gude! 9S7L4) 1615) . 522 87 | 28-45 15 9:93 | 102} 19°54 43) 11:60 | 44 | 29°15 87| 1666] 85| 944] 55] 8640) 90/ 17:24 1 27 16 | 10:80 17 | 326 1,600 ,, 1,800... 824| 147| 471] 83| 25:81) 17| 11°56) 100) 21:24) 45) 18°90) 67) 45-60 | 112| 23-80 | 59] 1822) 87| 25:15 | 96 | 20°40 2} 62 9} 613; 11) 234 1,800 OOM B08) | 1161) = ATE. 94| 26:26} 11 9-48 | 105 | 22°15 44 | 12:30| 50] 48-10 94| 19:84} 45] 12°58 95 | 21:55 70 | 14:76 1 28 15 | 12:94 16 | 3:38 | | | | | ‘ | | 2,000 ,, 2,200...| 256 s4| 340] 52) 20:80 9| 1071| 61) 17-94] 66) 2580| 22| 2620] 88| 2590] 42] 1640) 40] 4760) 82 | 24°10 8 | 813 7) 888) 15)" 4-41 2200 ,, 2,400...) 221) 49| 270} 89 | 17-64 4| 616| 43/| 1593] 58| 2400| 25| 51:00] 78] 2890] 53] 2400) 18| 38670 | 71) 26:30 2) ‘91 1) 2-04 See Ti 2,400 » 2600... 146] 29 | 175 B0 | 20:55 1 8:44 31 | 17°71 26 | 17:81 | 17 58°60 48 | 94:57} 46] 31:50 1 3:45 | 47) 26°85 — = tf 2°42 i 2°86 2,600 ,» 2,800... 105 | 28} 123] 21) 20-00 8 166 | 24] 19°51 41 | 89:00} 10] 55:60 51| 41:50] 28] 21:90 3 ee 26 | 21:15 baa 7G — = 5 407 2,800 ,, 8,000...) 74 | 8 | 82 7 9°45 -- - 7 | 8:54 | 28) 38:00 | 6| 75:00] 384) 41:50] 20) 27:00 1| 12:5 21 | 25°60 8 | 10°81 = = 8| 975 | | | 8,000 7 8,000... 144 5| 149 27 | 18:75 = = 27 | 18°12 56 | 89-00 | 4 | 80:00 60 | 40:30 43 | 29°85 — — 43 | 28°86 5 | 3:50 = = 5 | 3°36 8,500 » 4,000.... 77} — 77 12 | 15-58 — — 12 15:59 25 | 82°50 | — = 25 | 32:50] 14| 1818 #2 — 14 | 1818 6 | 7:80 — — 6 7°80 4,000 tons and above...| 101 | — 101 7/ 6:93 — = Ti) 6:93 64 | 63:40 — — 64 | 63:40 Aa OT i — 4 3°96 5 | 4:95 = _ 5 | 495 eee El oe 2 | — 7,755 4,975 4 7,626 4,246 | London 7,558 8,529 | Greenock 7,550 4,814 | Liverpool 7,537 4,005 | Southampton... 7,505 4,877 | West Hartlepool TAs 4,747 | Liverpool ... 7,460 4,817 ee 7,392 8,971 7,382 4,411 | Greenock 7,376 4,411 - 7,345 4,734 | Liverpool 7,825 4,833 Fy 7,323 4,784 a 7,302 4,783 ah 7,300 4,775 ie 7,269 4,030 5 7,237 4,691 ne 7,228 4,738 53 7,200 — r 7,198 4,668 | Belfast 7,142 8,752 | London 7,087 4,580 | Liverpool ... 7,057 4,586 | West Hartlepoo 7,011 4,461 | Liverpool 7,011 4,462 - 7,011 4,461 of 11,629 5,894 New York, U.S. 11,629 5,874 10,674 5,559 ” 10,669 5,468 7,575 4,897 S. Francisco, U.S. 12,522 7,975 Rotterdam 10,491 | 6,701 by 8,139 5,160 5 11,200 — Havre... 11,200 == es 9,047 2,881 B 8,810 2,147 7 7,395 2,889 s 7,112 2,511 5 7,087 2,527 A? When built. 1896 1897 1896 1898 1900 1891 1898 1899 1893 1898 1894 1900 1894 1898 1898 1899 1881 1900 1899 1899 1899 1897 1898 1898 1883 1899 1899 1900 1899 1881 1899 1898 1900 1900 1900 1895 1895 1888 1889 1896 1899 1898 1897 1900 1900 1890 1890 1886 1886 1885 Table 9—continued. Steam Vessels above 7,000 gross tonnage—continued. ) Dimeusions. Length. | Breadth.| Depth. Ft. Ft. Ft. 500°5 54-2 25-1 499°8 54°3 24°5. 499-9 54:3 25:1 499°7 54°3 24°5 499-9 54:0 36°9 531:0 54:8 179) 459-0 525 31:0 459-0 52°5 31:0 490°7 53:2 33°5 485:0 56:0 23°6 486°0 54:2 26°2 446-0 52-0 35°5 490°8 53:2 33°5 475°5 56:0 32°2 470-0 57-2 31:9 470-0 56:8 32°1 515°0 52°1 07°O 4500 54:2 31°6 450-0 54:2 31°6 485:'0 59-0 30°5 470:0 56°8 32:1 470-0 5671 31:9 480:0 52°3 27-0 480°0 52°3 27°0: 470°0 57°2 37-2 470°0 56:2 31:9 469°5 56:4 31°9 469°2 56°3 31:9 440:0 55-1 29°7 500 0 50-0 380 445 O 52:2 27°8 486°5 52°3 313 442-1 52°7 32°0 442-1 52°7 32:0 442-1 52°7 32°0 535°5 63:0 26°8: 535°5 63°0 26°8 527°6 63°2 22-0 527°6 63°2 22:0 455°0 58:0 23:4 549-9 62-0 42°6 515°3 59°8 23°8 470°3 538°2 22°83 563-1 60-0 35°9 563-1 60-0 35°9 520°2 56-0 34°6 500°0 57°5 34:0 495-4 52:2 34°8 495-4 51°8 34°56 493-4 51:8 34°5 Name of Vessels. GERMAN. Deutschland : Kaiser Wilhelm der Geoe Pennsylvania Pretoria . Graf Meaiderece:. Patricia ... re Grosser Kurfiirst Kaiser Friedrich Barbarossa Konig Albert Hamburg : Friedrich der Grosse Koningin Louise Bremen ... Bulgaria... Main 65 Batavia ... Belgravia Rhein Kiautschou Prinzess Irene ... Augusta Victoria Fiirst Bismarck .. as Kaiserin Maria eresia.. Bengalia... Frankfurt “ie Bethania... Belgia Bosnia Pheenicia Koln Hannover Columbia Drachenfels Russian. Smolensk Moskva ... Tonnage. | Gross. | Net. | 15,500 = 14,349 | 5,521 | 18,265 | 8,505 18,190 | 8,404 13,148 | 8,878 13,023 8,250 12,500 12,480 | 5,1 147 10,769 | 6,886 10,648 | 6,590 10,600 | 6,598 10,568 | 6,767 10,566 | 6,728 10,525 6,683 10,237 6,550 10,200 | 6,000 10,178 | 6,510 10,155 | 6,492 10,058 | 6,398 10,000 s 10,000 f. 8,479 8,568 8,430 | 8,226 8.278 | 8,014 7,661 | 4,910 7,500 — 7,492 | 4,889 7,490 | 4,850 7,486 | 4,824 7,412 | 4,750 7,409 | 4,666 7,805 | 4,635 7,241 | 2,299 7,144 | 4,674 7,270 2,730 7.267 | 2,784 4.1 Port of registry. Hamburg Bremen Hamburg ” ” be) Bremen Hamburg Bremen 9 Hamburg Bremen 7 ”? Hamburg Bremen Hamburg 9? Bremen Hamburg Bremen Hamburg ”? Bremen Hamburg Bremen Hamburg ) Bremen urd Hamburg Bremen Odessa Table 9—continued. Steam Vessels above 7,000 gross tonnage—continued. Dimensions. When built. Length. | Breadth. Ft. Ft. 1900 662-7 67:0 1897 626°7 66:0 1896 559°4 62-2 1897 561°0 62°2 1898 561-2 62°2 1899 584:0 62°3 1899 559°7 62:0 1897 581°7 63°7 1896 526°4 60:0 1899 499°3 60°2 1899 499°3 60:1 1896 523:0 60:1 1896 523°1 60:1 1897 5251 60:2 1898 501°4 62:2 1899 500-0 58:0 1899 501°3 62:2 1899 501-1 62-2 1899 501°0 581 1900 §24°2 60:1 1900 524°2 60°2 1889 522-2 56°4 1890 504°4 57°6 1890 §28°4 51°8 1898 485:0 57:0 1899 _ — 1899 485:0 57:0 1900 485-0 57°5 1899 485:0 57°4 1894 461:2 52°3 1899 480-0 54:0 1899 430-0 54°3 1889 463°5 55'°6 1899 456:0 58:1 1900 470:0 58°2 1898 487°0 58:2 Number above 7,000 gross tonnage of each nationality. British Nationality. American ... Dutch French German Russian Total Number. 136 Depth. Ft. 40-4 39°0 30-0 37°9 377 37°71 39°0 37°9 34:6 34°6 B4°5 34°8 d4°9 34°8 34°6 37°0 34°6 34°5 36°7 B4°5 34°7 33°38 34°1 06°9 32°9 32°9 32°8 32:7 31:9 B4°5 39°5 35°) 22°5 33°7 26-0 th Cog! Ss =z aa a ee ro) > = e = = 7 Nn arse Te Table 10. es. Nationa ee 5,000 | 5,000—7,000. 7,000—10,000.) Over 10,000. Total. 0 224 63 22 8,034 1 22 it 4 946 0 4 ae ua 216 Belgian 4 4 aa — 119 Brazilian ¥ 4 we ee 209 Chilian... 11 ag Se "ee 51 Danish ... 5 1 re, Pe 375 French 2 15 5 2 650 German 4 68 15 19 1,223 Grecian A Bre t< a ys 140 Dutch ... LO i 1 2 290 Italian ... 17 1 ior a 313 Japanese 2 17 eck ae 496 Norwegian 41 ep Tee we 824 Portuguese |, a ee oes 48 Russian AUT 10 2 an 480 Spanish 10 5 Be oe 442, Swedish Ae es ae ef 689 Turkish shes as ae — 110 pee. Total .75 372 87 49 15,655 | 42 Table 10. Classification according to Gross Tonnage of the Steam Vessels belonging to various nationalities. [Lloyd’s Register of British and Foreign Shipping, 1900. ] SS a ee Ee Number of Steamers of a Gross Tonnage of Nationality. 7 , 100—200, 200—400. 400—600. 600—800. 800—1,000. | 1,000—1,200. | 1,200—1,400. 1,400—1,700. | 1,700—2,000. | 2,000—3,000. | 3,000—4,000. | 4,000—5,000 | 5,000—7,000. 7,000—10,000.; Over 10,000. Total. British ... 208 pelea, 0b 903 453 372 332 327 269 348 394 1,208 783 290 224 63 22 8,084 American ane a 127 129 107 37 41 B4 37 53 64 187 62 41 22 1 4 946 Austria-Hungarian... 30 18 11 7 8 6 6 12 26 50 28 10 4 oes ae 216 Belgian sue ae 39 6 2 10 8 5 u 4 3 19 8 4 4 Of ao 119 Brazilian ah Be 18 54 56 29 11 11 4 Ihe 6 3 men ais Ag a seh 209 Pichaneee eee it 9 8 5 6 4 1 1 ee 2 12 2 i ae 51 Danish ... oe sels 49 60 41 23 27 B4 22 47 18 80 18 5 1 oot 375 French Ss Seve 116 72 31 28 34 85 32 55 38 89 66 82 15 5 2 650 German ae ae 212 106 87 102 107 48 55 85 53 151 Tal 44 68 15 19 1,223 Grecian ne oe 18 16 10 10 10 3 3 22 ili 35 2 ee Sx “iA? ay 140 Dutch ... a0 ane 37 21 14 27 18 25 23 22 17 45 27 10 i 1 2 290 Ttalian ... Be tae 24 20 22 16 12 19 25 25 30 79 23 17 1 ts as 313 Japanese nen art 163 92 53 25 9 15 12 22 20 AT 19 2 17 ae Sec 496 Norwegian oo ae 105 122 138 97 66 68 61 49 30 49 38 1 sis ac Sch 824 Portuguese aie 456 23 2 3 ae 1 ea 1 1 2 © 6 ain aCe we ar 48 Russian me ae 59 100 78 55 38 41 25 18 16 19 12 7 10 | 2 BOF 480 Spanish apie ae 61 23 31 82 36 31 23 37 32 91 30 10 5 tie ar 442 Swedish is so 236 1383 83 41 38 38 33 46 21 16 3 1 | = eC eas 689 Turkish Bos a 22 30 9 6 2 6 ial 6 9 8 1 ee ae | no ae 110 Total ... ...| 3,899 1,915 1,234 923 802 747 650 869 792 2,142 | 15199 475 | 9872 87 49 15,655 i ee gxweeere—e Table 11. rtion of the whole Kingdom. Total. Year. London. London. Rest of the United Kingdom. eet i yal ae Yoereis: | ho s. Tonnage. Vessels. | Tonnage. Vessels. Tonnage. 1853 11,639 2,5 . ia uae mes ie 1854 | 10,808 2.54 a ae 2 Te 7 1855 9,624 2.3 5.228.970 a ne ee Ah pa 9,696 ren 5,488,856 | 152,825 | 17,975,552 15°8 93-4 ea 10,539 vb 9 5,776,288 | 155,881 | 18,781,720 155 93°5 : : 11,083 os 5,882,589 | 152,381 | 18,645,804 158 24-0 859 | 10,694 8G, 5,898,518 | 158,694 | 19,652,688 156 93:1 ian en 2, 9% 6,111,643 | 162,669 | 20,946,749 15:3 22-6 a she : 3,12, 6,299,211 | 161,500 | 21,661,203 14:9 225 fae ees a 6,456,602 | 165,094 | 21,754,566 14:9 22:9 ae aque ia 3,41 6,556,017 | 163,440 | 22,128.873 14:9 29:8 126 3,34 6,309,192 | 164,297 | 22,409,604 138 22:0 face Freie a : 6,681,034 | 165,126 | 23,706,014 138 22:0 ina aa Be 6,813,003 | 163,902 | 25,062,307 13:5 91:4 oe sabe oe 6,623,534 | 162,692 | 25,163,895 130 208 a CEREe y! 5 6,602,677 | 157,284 | 24,944,658 13-4 20°9 207 6,693,861 | 160,365 | 25,795,878 13:0 20°6 ne me 4,03) 6,881,185 | 163,485 | 26,329,882 126 20:7 ie oe fos 6,848,642 | 166,982 | 27,973,819 11:8 19-7 a 847 6.787.678 | 167.484 | 29,217,412 11:8 18°8 (,) ty, ere es —|—7.776,040 | 196,698 | 52,518,814 | 165 | 193 , 6% 8,177,125 | 191,928 | 32,588,690 18-0 20:1 joa ele a 8,646,969 | 192,078 | 33,387,224 18:1 20°6 td ae Bc 9,074,519 | 197,399 | 35,891,406 181 20:2 fats Aiea io. 9,390,519 | 200,049 | 37,423,457 18°5 20:1 1879 10-795 B50 9,120,274 | 200,096 37,855,767 18°3 19°6 of 9,607,453 | 196,196 | 37,158,115 18:9 20°5 ae aad ao 10,078,578 | 204,483 | 89,987,251 18-5 20:2 piace WEG na Poe 10,001,526 | 199,390 | 39,066,084 189 20°4 Risae Meri ats a 10,248,037 | 203,221 | 40,702,982 18:7 20'1 Be feo sos Ro 11,002,768 | 201,924 | 42,057,404 19:3 20-7 11,345,542 | 194,397 | 40,063,340 19:9 29-1 1885 | 10,190 6,77 11,748,770 | 196,894 | 41,083,504 | 19-2 29:2 1886 9,991 6,70 11,597,756 | 195,080 | 40,225,317 18°9 99°4 1887 | 10,145 6,75 11,919,927 | 199,418 | 41,574,114 195 29:3 1888 | 10,385 7,29 12,599,451 | 211,501 | 48,557,953 18:9 29°4 1889 | 10,4938 7,36 12,355,244 | 216,789 | 44,949,675 183 216 1890 | 10,848 7,53 12,607,427 | 209,107 | 44,971,788 17:9 21-9 1891 9,965 7,44 12,636,634 | 204,701 | 44,619,462 18:2 22-1 1892 | 10,106 7,67 12,925,699 | 205,494 | 45,552,129 18:7 22-1 1893 9,841 7,66 13,450,979 | 204,799 | 45,422,576 19-0 22:8 1894 |) 10,224 8,17 14,008,965 | 211,187 | 48,287,704 181 22:5 1895 | 10,084 8,35 14,210,285 | 207,580 | 48,317,596 18-2 BDA 1896 | 10,772 8,81 14,974,362 | 216,516 | 50,488,564 18°6 22:9 ees Fae a 15,187,261 | 214,102 | 51,520,260 18°4 22:8 ’ , 14,664,493 | 203,291 50,765,585 10°7 22°4 1899(v)| 10,868 9,24 14,682,971 | 204,396 52,553,149 10°4 21:8 Faversham and Colchester. Year. 1853 1854 1855 1856 1857 1858 1859 1860 1861 1862 1868 1864 1865 1866 1867 1868 1869 1870 1871 1872 1873 1874 1875 1876 1877 1878 1879 1880 1881 1882 1883 1884 1885 1886 1887 1888 1889 1890 1891 1892 1898 1894 1895 1896 1897 1898(b) 1899(/) 43 Shipping entered with cargoes at the Port of London and the Ports of the rest of the United Kingdom; and London’s proportion of the whole Kingdom. From Foreign Countries, [“ Trade and Navigation” (1853-70), and “ Navigation and Shipping” (1871-99) Returns. ] Coastwise. Total. Table 11. London. Rest of the United Kingdom. Tonos Oster eet London. Rest of the United Kingdom. eee pes London. Rest of the United Kingdom. Loe Bee icinedom.. Vessels. Tonnage. Veszels. Tonnage, Vessels, Tonnage. Vessels. Tonnage. Vessels. Tonnage. Vessels. Tonnage. Vessels. Tonnage. Vessels. Tonnage. Vessels. Tonnage. 11,639 2,530,488 23,664 5,267,062 33:0 32:5 20,832 3,191,449 = = 5 = 32,471 5,721,937 — = — = 10,808 2,596,784 21,720 5,302,958 33:2 32°9 20,328 3,155,412 — — — = 31,136 5,752,196 _ — — = 9,624 2,376,047 18,652 4,642,421 34:0 33:9 19,040 2,852,223 = = = a 28,664 5,228,270 — — — = 9,696 2,559,806 20,909 5,681,858 31-7 311 18,989 2,923,550 | 181,916 12,293,694 12°6 19-2 28,685 5,483,356 | 152,825 17,975,552 15°8 23°4 10,539 2,779,682 22,156 5,952,124 32-2 318 17,990 2,996,606 | 133,175 12,829,596 11:9 18:9 28,529 5,776,288 | 155,331 18,781,720 15°5 93°5 11,083 2,931,552 23,518 5,885,985 32:0 33:3 17,538 2,951,037 | 128,863 12,759,819 12:0 18°8 28,621 5,882,589 | 152,381 18,645,804 15:8 24-0 10,694 2,802,463 25,601 6,288,180 29°5 30'8 18,689 3,096,055 | 133,093 13,364,508 12:3 18°8 29,383 5,898,518 | 158,694 19,652,688 15:6 93:1 11,108 2,957,082 27,252 7,097,899 28:9 29°4 18,365 3,154,561 | 185,417 13,848,850 11:9 186 29,473 6,111,643 | 162,669 20,946,749 15°3 226 10,769 3,128,135 26,813 7,477,044 28°7 29°5 17,406 3,171,076 | 184,687 14,184,159 11:4 18°3 28,175 6,299,211 | 161,500 21,661,203 14:9 22-5 11,549 3,313,078 28,590 7,427,730 28°8 30°9 17,295 3,143,524 | 136,504 14,326,836 112 18:0 28,844 6,456,602 | 165,094 21,754,566 14:9 92:9 11,521 3,411,880 80,390 7,725,478 27:5 30°6 17,040 3,144,187 | 133,050 14,403,395 11-4 17:9 28,561 6,556,017 | 163,440 22,128,873 14:9 228 11,126 3,333,025 80,983 7,969,085 26°4 29°5 15,184 2,976,167 | 183,314 14,440,519 10:2 17:1 26,310 6,309,192 | 164,297 22,409,604 13:8 22:0 11,525 8,615,654 32,962 8,543,040 25:9 29°7 14,923 8,065,380 | 132,164 15,162,974 1071 16:8 26,448 6,681,034 | 165,126 23,706,014 13:8 93:0 11,616 3,791,597 34,771 9,485,593 25:0 98°6 14,015 3,021,406 | 129,131 15,576,714 9-8 16:2 25,631 6,813,003 | 163,902 25,062,307 13°5 21-4 10,878 3,687,878 34,030 9,653,570 24-2 27°6 13,370 2,935,656 | 128,662 15,510,325 9-4 15:9 24,248 6,623,584 | 162,692 25,163,895 13:0 20:8 11,141 8,775,502 34,844 10,076,155 24:2 728 13,134 2,827,175 | 122,390 14,868,503 9-7 16:0 24,275 6,602,677 | 157,234 24,944,658 13°4 20°9 11,267 3,896,380 35,316 10,590,820 24:2 269 12,599 2,797,481 | 125,049 15,205,558 9:2 15°5 23,865 6,693,861 | 160,365 25,795,878 13:0 20°6 10,727 4,031,263 35,198 10,879,479 23°4 27:0 12,793 2,849,872 | 128,237 15,450,403 91 6,881,185 | 163,435 26,829,882 126 20:7 10,654 4,181,059 36,620 12,274,283 92:5 25°4 11,763 2,667,583 | 130,362 15,699,536 8:3 6,848,642 | 166,982 27,973,819 118 19:7 11,347 4,272,884 42.068 13,633,056 21:2 93:9 ic 11,028 2,514,794 | 125,366 15,584,356 $1 6,787,678 __|_167,434 29,217,412 118 188 (a) 10,804 4,480,933 42.337 14,314,124 20°3 23:8 27,193 3,295,107 | 153,361 18,199,190 15°3 7,776,040 | 195,698 82,513,314 16°5 19°3 11,241 4,671,676 41,270 14,409,730 214 24:5 30,828 3,505,449 | 150,658 18,178,960 17:0 8,177,125 | 191,928 32,588,690 18:0 2071 11,078 4,823,583 40,055 14,216,345 21°77, 25:3 31,458 3,823,386 | 152,023 19,120,879 17:1 8,646,969 | 192,078 33,387,224 181 20°6 11,298 5,202,432 42,658 15,824,239 20°9 24:7 32,282 8,872,087 | 154,741 20,067,167 17:3 9,074,519 | 197,399 35,891,406 181 20°2 11,827 5,583,794 43,241 16,547,832 21°5 25°2 33,446 3,806,727 | 156,808 20,875,625 17:6 9,890,519 | 200,049 37 423,457 18°5 20:1 10,992 5,250,814 40,662 16,067,432 91:3 94-6 33,793 3,869,460 | 159,434 21,288,335 17:5 ; 9,120,274 200,096 3 1,355,767 18:3 19°6 10,725 5,509,020 36,708 15,590,824 22°6 26:1 35,024 4,098,433 | 159,488 21,567,791 18:0 16:0 45,749 9,607,453 | 196,196 37,158,115 18:9 20°5 10,842 5,819,950 42.745 18,173,330 20°2 94:3 35,686 4,258,628 | 161,738 21,763,921 18-1 16-4 46,528 10,078,578 | 204,483 39,987,251 18°5 20:2 10,245 5,664,761 38,928 17,559,947 208 24°4 36,323 4,336,765 | 160,462 21,506,137 18°5 16°8 46,568 10,001,526 | 199,390 39,066,084 18:9 90:4 10,534 5,956,560 41,110 18,858,489 20°4 24:0 86,115 4,291,477 | 162,111 21,844,498 18-2 16°4 46,649 10,248,037 203,221 40,702,982 18:7 2071 10,615 6,447,269 40,361 19,863,049 208 94:5 37,663 4,555,499 | 161,563 22,194,355 18°9 17:0 48,278 11,002,768 | 201,924 42,057,404 19:3 20-7 10,409 6,591,225 36,504 18,105,460 999, 26°7 37,780 4,754,817 | 157,893 21,957,880 193 178 48,189 11,345,542 | 194,897 40,068,340 19:9 22:1 70,625 3,838 36.7 78 0.115 2,189.66 : 907 748,77 196,894 41,083,504 19:2 92:2 10,190 6,770,622 36,782 18,893,838 21-7 26:4 36,717 4,978,148 | 160,112 22,189,666 18:7 183 46,907 11,748,770 6,894 083, 9,991 6,704,792 | 34,691 17,978,437 22:4 27°2 35,448 4,892,964 | 160,339 | 22,246,880 18:1 18:0 45,489 | 11,597,756 | 195,030 | 40,225,317 189 22-4 10,145 6,757,162 36,408 19,242,648 218 26:0 38,200 5,162,765 | 163,010 22,331,466 19:0 18°8 48,345 11,919,927 | 199,418 41,574,114 19:5 29:3 10,385 7,291,825 36,948 19,785,357 219 26:9 38.828 5,807,626 | 174,553 23,772,596 18:2 18:2 49,213 12,599,451 211,501 43,557 958 18:9 22:4 10,493 7,360,213 38,858 21,157,607 91:3 258 37,970 4,995,031 | 177,981 23,792,068 17°6 17°3 48,463 12,355,244 | 216,789 44,949,675 18:3 21:6 10,843 7,532,174 88,641 21,446,818 911 26:0 35,333 5,075,253 | 170,466 23,524,970 17°2 IVP? 45,676 12,607,427 209,107 44,971,788 17:9 219 9.965 7,446,776 36,485 20,654,008 915 26:5 85,590 5,189,858 | 168,216 23,965,454 17:5 178 45,555 12,636,634 204,701 pie 18:2 22-1 10,106 7,672,216 38,018 21,857,658 21:0 26:0 37,024 5,253,483 | 167,476 23,694,476 18:1 18:1 47,130 12,925,699 205,494 45,552,129 18:7 22:1 9,841 7,660,202 36,688 21,135,534 212 266 38,074 5,790,777 | 168,111 24,287,042 185 19-2 47,915 13,450,9 9 204,799 45,422,576 19°0 228 10,224 8,176,817 38,772 22,964,309 90:9 96:3 36,303 5,827,148 | 172,415 25,278,895 17°4 18°7 46,527 14,003,965 | 211,187 48,237,704 181 22:5 10,084 8,352,345 37,545 23,005,828 21:2 266 36,231 5,857,940 | 170,085 25,311,768 176 18:8 46,315 14,210,285 207,580 48,317,596 18-2 22:7 10,772 8,813,752 39,067 24,665,810 216 26°3 38,641 6,160,610 | 177,449 25,822,724 17:9 19:3 49,413 14,974,362 216,516 50,488,564 18°6 22:9 10,734 8,957,104 39,414 25,679,017 21:4 95:9 37,437 6,230,157 | 174.688 25,841,213 17°6 19-4 48,171 15,187,261 | 214,102 51,520,260 18:4 28 : 7 Sachs ak Sance Sa0g aa ae TM s7 ae ae a ee 7 ~ 24,473 | 14,664,493 | 203,291 50,765,585 10°7 11,119 9,285,980 38,65! 25,229,824 22:3 26:9 13,354 5,078,513 | 164,636 25,535,761 7-5 17-4 24,473 664,49 291 0,76: 10,868 9,244,593 39,678 26,981,283 DALLES 25°5 12,843 5,488,878 | 164,718 25,571,866 7:2, We 23,711 14,682,971 | 204,396 52,553,149 10:4 218 (a) There is clearly an alteration in the basis adopted in the official retnrns at this point, though no explanation appears to be given. . , (b) Coastwise—For the years 1898 and 1899 the returns exclude vessels trading within the Hstuary of the Thames, within the Ports of London, Rochester, Faversham and Colchester. Tabie 12. Shipping cleared with c (“Trade and Navigation” (1853-70) and “ Navigation and Total. Year. London London Rest of the United Kingdom ‘ of the United Kingdom. Vessels. | Tonnage. | Tonnage. Vessels. Tonnage. Vessels. Tonnage. 1858 4,745 1,262,74 2,247,227 as — — —_ 1854 4,805 1,341,00 2,275,856 — at — = 1855 4,890 1,849,54 2,227,724 = — — — 1856 5,221 1,538,92 2,510,158 | 182,449 22,464,860 73 101 1857 5,818 1,561,22 2,587,316 | 186,213 23, 642, 559 7:0 9:9 1858 5.056 1,599,28 2,615,550 | 181,258 23,187,865 7:0 1071 1859 5,070 1,569,90) 2,646,064 184,189 24, 107,370 To 98 1860 5,008 1,568,93 | 2,645,984 | 188,080 | 25,151,402 68 9:5 1861 5,596 1,643.6 2,705,045 | 191,432 | 26,003-357 67 94 1862 5,262 1,775,75 2,835,865 | 192,112 | 26,309 214 6:5 9:7 1863 5,580 1,906,1 3,029,710 | 188,165 26,384,101 68 10°3 1864 5,158 1.786,1 2,854,468 | 187,877 | 26,911,148 65 9:6 1865 5,265 1,842.19 2,964,000 185,018 27,968,739 6°7 9°6 1866 5,292 1,914,8 8,044,842 | 188,050 | 29,548,448 66 93 1867 5,194 1,942,2 3,072,675 | 182,332 | 80,182,200 66 9-2 1868 5,427 2.039,7 3,220,879 | 178,234 30,090,692 WEAN 9°7 1869 5,768 2,,206,8 3,358,406 176,260 30,406,840 76 9°9 1870 5,568 2,207,0 8,410,629 181,453 31,560,976 7-5 98 1871 6,317 2,506,2 3,785,678 | 185,899 33, 652, 002 8:0 10°71 1872 6,033 2,560,0 3,876,808 176,112 33, 294, 44] 8'°6 10°4 1873 6,063 2,.688,8 8,967,504 | 188,749 34,305,578 8:0 10°4 1874 6,199 2,899,6 4,147,219 | 186,604 35, 029, 803 79 10°6 1875 6 209 2,945,2 4,268,788 | 189,406 36,824,935 75 10°4 1876 6,272 3,184,5 4,508,673 | 194,928 38, 498, 310 7°5 10°5 1877 6,228 8,138.7 4,497,623 192,451 38,920,072 7-6 10°4 1878 6,156 3,174,6 4,578,614 194,589 39, 544,182 7-6 10°4 1879 6,115 8,272,64 . 4,650,707 | 197,757 41,305,989 7°4 101 1880 6,375 3,607,9 5,026,248 205,175 44,390,346 74 10°2 1881 6,322 3,686,9 5,140,697 202,611 44,564,850 Y fal: 10°4 1882 6.357 3,702.8 5,178,217 | 206,879 | 46,100,320 8:0 10°1 1883 6,314 3,853,6 5,483,380 204,612 47, 992,489 86 10°3 1884 6,445 4,127,0 5,884,610 | 199,754 47,563,222 9:0 110 1885 6,310 4,242.8 6,012,415 | 201,398 | 47,951,358 8:9 111 1886 6,323 4,418,9 6,183,781 | 198,958 47,415,678 9:0 115 1887 6,334 4,320,8 6,229,504 | 205,232 48,065 909 92 11°3 1888 6,371 4,618,9 6,645,966 | 221,649 52,798,655 92 11:2 1889 6,450 4,711,4 6,705,474 226,205 58,838,462 9:2 111 1890 6,547 5,027,7 7,076,794 | 216,655 54,167,694 94 116 1891 6,259 5,004,1 7,067,393 214,630 54, 926,037 9°4 11:4 1892 6,378 5,187,8 7,348,711 213,047 54 ‘328, 640 9°7 11°9 1893 6,039 4,804,5 7,010,217 | 212,393 54, 768,054 9°9 11-4 1894 6,271 5,245,4 7,598,024 216,648 58,199,045 10:0 11:5 1895 6,241 5,293,3 7,613,877 | 214,127 58,536,265 97 115 1896 6,722 5,679,6 8,009,963 | 221,237 60,325,459 99 LE7 1897 6,818 5,869,7 8.175.404 222,270 62. 094, 415 9°4 116 1898(a)| 6,997 6,212,9 8,014,913 | 212,086 61,453,820 via) 12°2 1899(a)| 6,881 6,042,0 8,250,733 | 214.629 | 65,336,806 7-2, 11:2 ster, Faversham, and Colchester. 44 Table 12. Shipping cleared with cargoes from the Port of London and from the rest of the United Kingdom; and London’s Proportion of the whole Kingdom. [“Trade and Navigation” (1853-70) and “ Navigation and Shipping” (1871-99) Returns.] ee 585888 a em To Foreign Countries. Coastwise. Total. F x: London’s P ion, 5 : a: , : , : Year. London. Rest of the United Kingdom. rears tea foes London, Rest of the United Kingdom, eye Enel a London. Rest of the United Kingdom. erie eae Vessels. Tonnage. Vessels. Tonnage. Vessels. Tonnage. Vessels. Tonnage. Vessels. Tonnage. Vessels. Tonnage. Vessels. Tonnage. Vessels. Tonnage. Vessels, Tonnage. 1858 4,745 1,262,748 29,772 6,320,868 Shy 16°6 9,286 984,484 = = = = 14,031 2,247,227 — — —_ == 1854 4,805 1,341,007 80,842 6,529,529 135 17:0 8,886 934,849 _ oa = 13,691 2,275,856 — — — — 1855 4,890 1,349,542 32,093 6,999,122 13:2 16:2 8,483 878,182 = ae = = 138,378 2,227,724 —_ as. _ — 1856 5,221 1,533,926 36,182 8,127,408 12°6 15°9 9,059 976,232 | 146,317 14,887,452 5:8 64 14,280 2,510,158 | 182,449 22,464,860 7:3 101 1857 5,318 1,561,221 39.080 8,778,352 12:0 151 8,726 1,026,095 | 147,188 14,864,207 6:0 6:5 14,044 2,587,316 | 186,218 23,642 559 7:0 99 1858 5.056 1,599,283 37,811 8,343,141 11:8 16:1 8,548 1,016,267 | 148,447 14,844,724 56 6:4 18,604 2,615,550 | 181,258 23,187,865 7-0 10:1 1859 5,070 1,569,904 38,042 8,674,059 118 15°3 9,091 1,076,160 | 146,147 15,433,311 5:9 65 14,161 2,646,064 | 184,189 24,107,370 7:2 98 1860 5,008 1,568,930 39,479 9,214,007 ile 146 8,818 1,077,004 | 148,601 15,987,395 56 6:4 13,821 2,645,934 | 188,080 25,151,402 68 9°5 1861 5,596 1,643,680 42,885 9,676,124 i) 145 8,083 1,061,365 | 148,547 16,327,233 5-2 61 13,679 2,705,045 | 191,482 26,003,357 67 9-4 1862 5,262 1,775,753 43,703 9,934,096 10°7 15:2 8,147 1,060,112 | 148,409 16,375,118 5-2 61 13,409 2,835,865 | 192,112 26,309. 214 6:5 9:7 1863 5,530 1,906,126 42,864 9,981,679 11:4 16:0 8,290 1,123,584 | 145,301 16,402,422 5:4 64 13,820 3,029,710 | 188,165 26,384,101 68 103 1864 5,158 1,786,134 | 42,120 10,386,640 10°9 14:7 7,801 1,068,334 | 145,757 16,524,508 51 61 12,959 2,854,468 | 187,877 | 26,911,148 6:5 96 1865 5,265 1,842,136 42,952 10,985,015 10:9 14:4 8,035 1,121,864 | 142,066 16,983,724 5:3 6-2 13,300 2,964,000 | 185,018 27,968,739 67 96 1866 5,292 1,914,384 44,482 12,095,710 10°6 13°7 7,627 1,129,958 | 138,618 17,447,733 5:3 61 12,919 3,044,342 | 183,050 29,543,448 66 93 1867 5,194 1,942,201 46,257 12,905,380 10°71 13:1 7,155 1,130,474 | 136,075 17,276,820 5:4 61 12,949 8,072,675 | 182,382 30,182,200 6:6 9:2 1868 5,427 2,039,753 47,478 13,433,266 10°3 13:1 8,178 1,181,126 | 130,756 16,657,426 5:9 6:6 13,600 3,220,879 | 178,284 30,090,692 71 9:7 1869 5,768 2,206,306 46,235 13,710,678 111 140 8,731 1,152,100 | 130,025 16,696,162 63 6:5 14,494 3,358,406 | 176,260 30,406,840 7-6 9:9 1870 5,568 2,207,037 47,703 14,506,901 10°4 13°2 9,125 1,203,592 | 133,750 17,054,075 6:4 6:6 14,688 8,410,629 | 181,458 31,560,976 7-5 98 1871 6,317 2,506,204 52,398 16,541,251 10°7 132 9,879 1,279,474 | 133,506 17,110,751 6:9 7:0 16,196 3,785,678 | 185,899 38,652,002 8:0 10:1 1872 6,033 2,560,067 50,464 16,688,285 10-7 13°3 10,482 1,816,741 | 125,648 16,606,156 7-7 7:3 16,515 3,876,808 | 176,112 38,294,441 86 10-4 1873 6,063 2,688,821 48,039 16,450,544 11:2 14:0 10,284 1,278,683 | 140,710 17,855,034 6:8 6:7 16,347 3,967,504 | 188,749 34,305,578 8:0 10°4 1874 6,199 2.899,671 47,554 16,853,816 11'5 14-7 9,882 1,247,548 | 139,050 18,175,487 6:6 6:4 16,081 4,147,219 | 186,604 35,029,803 7:9 10°6 1875 6 209 2,945,204 48,119 17,468,535 11:4 14:4 9,264 1,318,534 | 141,287 19,356,400 6:2 6:4 15,478 4,263,738 | 189,406 36,824,985 75 10°4 1876 6,272 8,184,525 49,879 18,376,188 112 146 9,611 1,869,148 | 145,049 20,122,122 62 6:4 15,883 4,508,678 | 194,928 38,498,310 750) 10°5 1877 6,228 3,138,779 46,788 18,056,577 11°8 148 9,564 1,358,844 | 145,713 20,863,495 62 61 15,792 4,497,623 | 192,451 38,920,072 7-6 10°4 1878 6,156 3,174,696 46,593 18,406,992 ile 14:7 9,981 1,403,918 | 147,946 21,137,190 63 62 16,137 4,578,614 | 194,589 39,544,182 76 10°4 1879 6,115 3,272,649 46,541 19,576,708 116 14:3 9,790 1,878,058 | 151,216 21,729,281 61 6:0 15,905 4,650,707 | 197,757 41,305,989 74 101 1880 6,875 3,607,952 51,072 22,077,718 111 14:0 10,088 1,418,296 | 154,103 22,312,628 61 6:0 16,463 5,026,248 | 205,175 44,390,346 7-4 10:2 1881 6,322 3,686,982 48,590 22,649,711 11°5 140 10,470 1,458,715 | 154,021 21,915,139 6:4 6:2 16,792 5,140,697 | 202,611 44,564,850 7-7 10:4 1882 6,357 3,702,898 50,259 23,995,965 11:2 134 11,579 1,475,819 | 156,120 22,104,355 6:9 6:3 17,936 5,178,217 | 206,879 46,100,320 8:0 101 1883 6,314 3,853,681 49,241 25,519,479 11°4 eel 13,026 1,629,699 | 155,871 22,473,010 7-7 6:8 19,340 5,483,380 | 204,612 47,992,489 86 10°3 1884 6,445 4,127,045 47,318 25,146,617 12:0 14:1 13,394 1,757,565 | 152,441 22,416,605 81 7:3 19,8389 5,884,610 | 199,754 47,563,222 9:0 110 1885 6,310 4,242,887 46,076 25,074,894 12:0 14:5 13,312 1,769,578 | 155,317 22,876,464 7:9 7-2, 19,622 6,012,415 | 201,893 47,951,358 8:9 he 1886 6,323 4,418,999 44,317 24,688,641 12°5 15:2 13,319 1,764,732 | 154,686 22,727,032 7-9 7:2, 19,642 6,183,731 | 198,958 47,415,673 9:0 11:5 1887 6,334 4,320,304 45,085 25,850,833 12:3 14:3 14,519 1,909,200 | 160,147 22,215,576 8:3 76 20,8538 6,229,504 | 205,232 48,065,909 9-2 ilies 1888 6.371 4,618,998 45,924 27,045,447 12:2 14:6 16,011 2,026,973 | 175,725 25,748,208 8:3 7:3 22,382 6,645,966 | 221,649 52,793,655 92 11:2 1889 6,450 4,711,458 48,095 28,337,423 118 14:3 16,483 1,994,016 | 178,110 25,501,039 8:5 7-3 22,938 6,705,474 | 226,205 58,838,462 9-2 111 1890 6,547 5,027,777 48,012 28,829,306 12:0 14:8 15,891 2,049,017 | 168,643 25,338,388 86 7°5 22,438 7,076,794 | 216,655 54,167,694 94 116 1891 6,259 5,004,190 47,725 29,209,250 | 11:6 146 15,904 2,063,203 | 166,905 25,716,787 8:7 74 22,168 7,067,393 | 214,680 54,926,087 9-4 11-4 1892 6,378 5,187,898 46,409 28,755,927 | 121 15°3 16,585 2,155,813 | 166,688 25,572,718 91 78 22.968 7,848,711 | 213,047 54,328,640 9°7 11:9 1893 6,039 4,804,519 44,641 28,147,932 11:9 14°6 17,211 2,205,698 | 167,752 26,620,122 9°3 76 23,250 7,010,217 | 212,393 54,768,054 9-9 114 1894 6,271 5,245,456 46,602 30,532,276 11:9 14:7 17,836 2,352,568 | 170,046 27,666,769 9°5 7:8 24,107 7,598,024 | 216,648 58,199,045 10:0 11:5 1895 6,241 5,298,372 46,262 30,979,114 11:9 14:6 16,794 2,820,505 | 167,865 27,557,151 9:1 78 23,035 7,613,877 | 214,127 58,536,265 9'7 11'5 1896 6,722 5,679,601 47,415 32,023,694 12°4 151 17,601 2,380,862 | 178,822 28,301,765 9:2, 76 24,323 8,009,963 | 221,237 60,325,459 99 117 1897 6,818 5,869,729 48,396 38,438,547 13 14:9 16,226 | 2,805,675 178,874 28,655,868 _ oe O ee | SY bee 3s (23,044 | 8.175.404 | 222,270 | 62,094,415 9:4 116 1898(a)| 6,997 6,212,918 47,665 33,249,724 12°8 ia 7 10,257 2,299,995 | 164,371 28,204,096 59 Wo 17,254 8.012.918 | 212,086 | 61,458,820 Wao 12°2 83 6,042,050 50,949 36,946,270 118 14:1 9,818 2,208,688 | 163,680 28,390,036 SPY) 7-9 16,649 8,250,733 | 214,629 65,336,306 7:2. 11:2 1899(a)} 6,881 U4, > ) , a a a a a ST SoS SSS SSS EES SSS (a) Coastwise—For the years 1898 and 1899 the returns exclude all vessels trading within the Estuary of the Thames, within the Ports of London, Rochester, Faversham, and Colchester. Tonnage of Shipping [The figures as to tons Table 13. of the United Kingdom; and London’s Proportion of nd Navigation” (1861) and “ Navigation and Shipping ” 1891. 1899. Country from which en London’s London’s Rest of proportion Bost of proportion United Kingdom.) fe saree luted Ringdar ees Kingdom. Kingdom. Russia ... 1,610,172 29°3 618,515 1,820,285 25°2 Sweden 1,181,372 24:9 432,068 1,637,044 20:9 Norway 1,140,048 155 323,601 1,446,420 18:3 Denmark 442, 755 6'8 25,470 1,133,895 22 Germany 3,206, 569 162 584,263 4,603,345 113 Holland 2,605,836 27°0 1,066,044 4,349,624 19°7 Belgium 2,244,556 14:2 718,639 2,978,129 19°4 France... 5,268,537 7-4 297,166 5,536,638 51 Portugal 131,488 10°7 68,672 172,018 27°0 Spain ... 2,086,300 96 244,598 8,598,214 64 Italy 168,538 38:6 104,299 491,428 17°5 Austria... 87,228 224 18,766 83,382 18°4 Greece .. 70,192 36°3 16,3870 189,786 79 Bulgaria 3,907 ies 130,982 >| 45°6 Hast Atrica and Mencia ab 5 11,1538 iS ilabyy 46:0 10,185 7,258 58°4 22,582 5,414 80°7 27,810 ) 682 India, Straits Settlements and Hong Kong es : 366,492 384,936 52:3 511,696 405,861 558 645,019 599,174 518 699,580 797,65 46:7 756,465 533,602 58'6 Australia and New Zealand 99,459 14,085 87'6 220,815 7,879 96:8 408,557 62,608 866 700,544 46,525 938 884,828 129,596 87:2 British North America 190,682 1,123,102 14:5 147,271 1,022,904 126 266,267 1,098,661 19°5 178,804 1,147,01 13:2 287,441 1,701,634 14:4 British West India Islands | 4 943 9 On. 7 590 89 453 Se 2~ NOR 99958 > 9907 7Q KOR ' R47 97.156 ‘ eit cetina end Walkdand Isl: aa 164,94: 119,954 57:9 146,590 189,456 51:3 135,096 122,258 525 83,227 78,595 51:4 87,617 27,15¢ 76:3 Total British Possessions 1,017,899 1 af 1B, 790 36°4 1,211,480 1,780,525 40°5 1,670,619 2,206,748 43:1 1,927,022 2,532,538 43:2 2,392,979 8,005,654 44:3 Total Foreign Countries and British Possessions 8,163,142 | 10,016,447 | 240 | 4,825,187 | 16,154,760 | Q1-1 | 5,810,043 | 22,708,972 | 20:4 | 7,687,965 | 29,221,050 | 207 | 9,487,950 | 39,487,968 | 193 a (a) The figurés relating to these countries are for this year included with Central America in the returns. (b) These figures for 1861 include the Ionian Islands, then a British possession, but since transferred to Greece. Table 14. | of the United Kingdom ; and London’s Proportion of he “Trade and Navigation” (1861) and “ Navigation London’s London’s Country to which Rest of proportion Reskot proportion : F per cent. London, P : per cent. United Kingdom. of United United Kingdom.) or Whitea Kingdom. Kingdom. Russia ... Sweden... Norway Denmark Germany Holland Belgium France... Portugal Spain ... Italy re Austria... ie ee Greece .. Bulgaria o. Roumania (Wallachia a1 a Turkish Dominions pee Egypt . Arabia . Tripoli, Tunis and Mor Persia ... Siam China ... Japan ... Philippine and ‘other Pa United States ... Cuba, Hayti and San D Mexico .. Central WGneriods Argentine hagas Gmit. ... Brazil . Other South American 4 Whale and Deep Sea Fi Foreign Possessions Total Foreign Channel Islands : Gibraltar, Malta and G land) * : West Africa and Ascen South Africa ... . East Africa and Mauriti India, Straits Settlemen Australia and New Zeal British North America British West India Isla Honduras and Guiana.. Total British Total Foreig British Pos 1,373,495 1,281,317 1,129,614 1,139,872 3,880,630 1,055,251 1,290,509 4,248,752 356,673 1,316,580 2,162,620 96,884 157,778 1,921 165,082 821,999 1,521 981,121 14,183 1,105 97,390 46,799 42,313 8,877,869 4,195 99,948 8,158 467,881 361,246 825,769 351,133 3,683 1,041,369 27,704,600 316,763 488,802 94,249 415,699 122,454 1,471,927 350,580 943,643 262,336 4,461,453 32,166,053 SE KKH IPOD POOhD- Soa Coendhoaewd NOoordo | [oo ore e ro) 8°8 BS CD P| wooODEm NHNwwg i Do@mwoc§ Hos] 251,204 2,520,470 91 176,831 1,961,049 83 221,279 1,838,844 14:2 82,175 1,448,149 2:2 594,309 8,854,571 13°4 1,182,492 1,675,078 40°3 788,740 1,562,853 33°5 447,250 5,443,263 76 19,977 354,730 53 195,974 1,885,704 9:4 26,287 8,008,458 ‘9 20,846 231,252 8:3 1,276 238,194 5 es 8,319 — 12,184 154,663 73 54,151 800,346 153 ae, 9,728 — 12,221 1,183,246 1:0 1,487 56,521 2°6 1,702 3,564 32:3 aes 2,662 — 24,507 46,007 34'8 141,347 281,981 33°4 7,155 89,193 15°4 1,181,345 5,248,706 18-4 657 152,537 ‘4, 1,480 118,897 12 1,949 17,907 98 45,982 987,021 4:7 17,0380 355,023 4:6 80,757 767,490 38 21,870 490,637 4:3 = 4,904 = 245,821 1,836,312 15°5 5,710,185 | 87,027,769 13°4 21,888 390,998 5-3 5,047 410,421 12 5,233 174,957 29 149,624 538,794 21:9 48,233 184,804 20:7 264,580 1,280,641 177 675,944 258,626 727 157,990 1,487,729 9°6 52,401 121,110 30°2 1,380,940 4,788,075 22°4 7,091,125 | 41,815,844 145 46 Table 14. Tonnage of Shipping Cleared to each of the Chief Foreign Countries and British Possessions from the Port of London and from the Ports of the rest of the United Kingdom; and London’s Proportion of the whole Kingdom. [The figures as to tonnage for London and for the United Kingdom (and by deduction for the “rest of the United Kingdom”) are obtained from the “Trade and Navigation” (1861) and “ Navigation and Shipping” (1871, 1881, 1891, & 1899) Returns.] —_— EE LO __O_e———— 1861. 1871. 1881. 1891. 1899. Country to which cleared, opera qendon's London’s London’s London’s Rest of Rest of proportion proportion proportion e proportion London. United Kingdom. Be London. Ninibed "Kid eaera’ ae oad London. United! ‘Kivedom, ee ees London. Unites Kinedom, Lee London. Doe cae Baa a Kingdom. Kingdom. Kingdom. Kingdom. Kingdom. Russia ... es. 102,481 481,709 17:5 114,795 | 1,027,854 10:0 134,562 | 1,233,187 98 241,254 | 1,873,495 14:9 251,204 | 2,520,470 91 Sweden... ... oss 91.723 241,809 27°5 212,102 470,943 31-0 172,156 771,464 18°2 182,061 | 1,281,317 12°4 176,831 | 1,961,049 83 Norway 125,555 265,221 32-1 193,438 493,279 98:2 167,827 674.676 19°9 260.890 | 1,129,614 18°8 221979 | 1,838,844 14-2 Denney 169,049 419,341 98-7 136,029 607,987 183 108,917 819,767 IS, 110,860 1,139,872 89 82,175 1,448,149 2:2. ermany 204,601 1,369,181 13:0 376,201 2,187,604 14-7 510,014 | 2,129,515 193 558,274 | 3,880,630 142 594,309 | 8,854,571 13:4 Belgian Tebere | ortrecty | eel | Cede Prete ere) cee) | tay (Pees aetaen i || Geek bi BEE : : ; : 8! i 7,590 : 338,7 ,290,509 20°5 788,740 | 1,562,853 33:°5 Pian 210,248 | 1,459,967 12:6 876,762 | 2,277,614 14-2 874,771 | 8,596,764 94 281,885 | 4,248,752 62 447,250 | 5,448,263 76 ortug 18,185 158,990 106 53,180 182,279 226 72,288 238,987 23:2 30,670 356,673 79 19,977 354,730 53 Spain ... 85,250 471,159 7-0 37,517 541,599 65 60,237 | 1,144,552 50 115,637 | 1,816,580 8:0 195,974 | 1,885,704 9-4 Hale oe 1018 Bee 56 ae HME ay 32.377 | 1,218,587 26 78,927 | 2,162,620 3:5 26,287 | 8,008,458 ‘9 Le ae : i : 2 ; 11,676 54,824 17°6 1,183 96,884 12 20,846 231,252 8:3 Greece ... 2,761 20,522 119 2,335 60,840 3:7 2,220 94,4038 23 — 157,773 = 1,276 233,194 5 Bulgaria vee nee wee ee = — — — — — — —_ — — 1,921 — = 3,319 — Roumania (Wallachia and Moldavia) ... 6,718 7,899 459 4,797 35,233 12:0 7,818 52,846 12:9 10,595 165,082 6:0 12,134 154,663 7-3 ne Dominions 6,081 161,523 3:6 18,166 284,747 6:0 17,362 231,490 7:0 30,955 821,999 8:8 54,151 300,346 153 yssinia — a — — — = — — = — 1,521 — = 9,723 — Egypt te 2,025 178,682 12 14,507 546,575 26 1,524 641,109 2-4 — 981,121 = 12,221 1,183,246 10 MEER eR ss = = ae = 2,562 — _ 5,212 == = a a es — Tripoli, Tunis and Moroceo 2,988 4,187 416 2,017 10,421 16:2 6,247 6,994 47:2 14,393 14,183 50°4 1,487 56,521 26 Persia ... 1,164 = 100:0 1,571 ke 100:0 = 881 — 1,067 = 100-0 1,702 3,564 39:3 Siam... 646 — 100:0 1,476 407 78:4 — 2117 — — 1,105 Se — 2,662 = China ... 29,579 37,768 43.9 45,512 22,439 67:0 5,030 19,507 20°5 — 97,390 <= 24,507 46,007 34:8 apange wee: ect ee wie = os 16,174 16,281 49°8 4,015 18,167 18:1 272 46,799 6 141,347 281,981 33-4 Philippine and other Pacific Islands ... 364 13,933 25 1,097 9,737 101 2,762 58,139 49 — 42,313 — 7,155 89,193 154 United States... 0. we 252,522 | 1,478,293 146 226,085 | 2,488,784 8:3 548155 | 3,768,941 12:7 775,411 | 8,877,869 16-7 1,181,345 | 5,248,706 18:4 Cuba, Hayti and San Domingo 18,040 195,414 8:4 1,166 9,737 10°7 325 4,261 71 2,095 4,195 33:3 657 152,537 ‘4 Mexico te ames | = 11,914 An 3,277 84,734 8°6 4,266 90,649 4:5 3,621 99,948 35 1,430 118,397 12 Central America 34,812 418,861 77 5,957 4,692 55°9 3,031 2,015 601 2,358 8,158 224 1,949 17,907 9:8 are Republic ee; ( 11,548 111,100 94 6,110 193,975 3:0 24,066 467,881 4:9 45,982 937,021 4-7 a oe, ee ; © () © | pee Nee 88 | avec 1 arisse | ane | vrrouill ceerzooe lean [ee eater ccm pees Rove merica: Counce ae 21,595 346,045 59 28,986 202,218 12°5 11,628 351,133 32 21,870 490,637 4:3 ale and Deep Sea Fisheries = = 10,228 nee — 4,806 -- — 6,630 — — 3,633 — — 4,904 — Foreign Possessions «.. 30,740 299,857 93 39,674 543,632 68 43,167 840,488 49 48,058 | 1,041,369 4:4 245,821 1,336,312 15°5 Total Foreign Countries ...| 1,648,378 8,717,170 15°9 2,407,525 | 15,115,157 13°7 2,951,268 | 20,889,414 12°4 4,193,423 | 27,704,600 13:1 5,710,185 | 37,027,769 , 13°4 Channel Islands Pie a ao 7,194 158,032 4:5 7,428 179,959 4:0 13,523 280,834 4:6 16,009 316,763 48 21,888 390,993 5:3 Gibraltar, Malta and Gozo (and Heligo- Ignd) ae ee ee ee 38,395(b)| 195,467(b)| 14-6(») 45,326 237,487 16:0 18,608 526,081 34 3,174 483,802 6 5,047 410,421 12 West Africa and Ascension a ) ( 9,572 138,273 419 3,189 7,504 29°8 2,885 94,249 30 5,233 174,957 29 South Africa ahs ay 70,981 74,508 48°83 39,3849 49,263 44°4 185,338 235,229 44:1 189,697 415,699 313 149,624 538,794 21:9 East Africa and Mauritius si 11,842 90,594 116 12,504 106,751 10°5 5,693 122,454 4: 48,233 184,804 ) > 4 ’ , 20 ie India, Straits Settlements & Hong Kong] 236,928 572,050 29°3 354,512 911,847 28°0 463,435 1,426,850 24'5 428,172 | 1,471,927 22°'5 264,580 1,230,641 177 Reread Waniicalaed eee 2.) © 219 287 117.879 65:1 237,797 66,959 78:0 560,497 198,258 73:9 718,436 350,580 67:0 675,944 258,626 72-7 British North America ! 117,420 991,543 10:8 93,408 888,080 9°5 164,181 1,078,835 13:2 187,357 943,643 ilepy 157,990 1,487,729 9:6 Deaaayevlies Toda Lalas 4 ‘ 99,728 166,097 37:5 116,529 192,074 37°8 105,717 202,514 34:3 97,706 262,836 27-1 52,401 121,110 30°2 Total British Possessions 784,928 2,270,576 95°7 915,763 2,629,536 25'8 1,526.992 4,062,856 27°3 1,594,129 4,461,453 263 1,380,940 4,788,075 294 Total Foreign Countries and British Possessions 2.428.306 | 10,987,746 18:1 8,323,288 | 17,744,693 158 4,478,260 | 24,952,270 15:2 5,787,552 | 32,166,053 15°2 7,091,125 | 41,815,844 14:5 { Dennen eee eee (a) The figures relating to these countries are for this year included with Central America in the returns. ‘h These figures for 1861 inglude the Ionian Islands, then a British Possession but since transferred to Greece. 7 AZ Table 15. Value of Imports into the Port of London and the ports of the rest of the United Kingdom; and London’s proportion of the whole Kingdom. [The figures as to London and the United Kingdom (and by deduction for the “ rest of the United Kingdom,”) are obtained from the “ Trade” (1872-99) Returns. | Value of Imports into the London’s Proportion Year. per cent. of the Port of London, (@) Pace Kingdorn, eee 1872 124,174,141 | 230,519,483 30°0 1873 127,561,118 | 248,726,259 34°4 1874 130,962,119 239,120,582 35°4 1875 135,102 452 238,837,125 36°1 1876 134,885,015 240,269,688 35°9 1877 140,332,773 254,086,909 33°6 1878 126,696,104 242,074,638 34:4 1879 129,105,188 233,886,687 39°6 1880 141,442,907 269,786,658 34:4 1881 189,809,484 257,218,005 35°2 1882 142,507,974 270,511,634 34°5 1883 145,189,505 281,752,074 34°0 1884 141,901,621 248,116,948 36°4 1885 132,699,036 238,268,919 30'8 1886 128,008,767 221,854,705 36°6 1887 129,480,751 232,796,813 30°7 1888 138,183,465 249,452 278 30'°7 1889 144,711,517 | 282,926,078 33°8 1890 144,515,992 | 276,176,005 34°4 1891 149,473,286 285,967,978 34:3 1892 144,273,415 279,520,467 34°1 1893 141,560,207 263,127,971 35°0 1894 141,455,868 266,888,942 34°6 1895 145,047,445 271,642,218 34°8 1896 146,852,558 294,956,346 33:2 1897 151,209,683 299,819,277 33°5 1898 155,669,956 314,874,746 331 1899 164,105,695 320,929,888 33'8 (a) From Ist April, 1884, the returns include Queenborough with London ; previous to this it was included with Rochester. 48 Table 16. Value of Exports from the Port of London and the Ports of the rest of the United Kingdom; and London’s proportion of the whole Kingdom. (The figures as to London and the United Kingdom (and by deduction for the “rest of the United Kingdom ”) are obtained from the ‘“ Trade and Navigation ” (1857-70) and the “ Trade” (1871-99) Returns. ] Home Produce. Foreign and Colonial Produce. TOTAL. ’ ’ ’ Year. Port ee . ug proportion Park oe os Ae proportion Port ne es ae proportion nitec | ; nite | ts nite ts of London. Kingdom. i United of London. Kingdom. fic United of London. Kingdom. The United Kingdom. | Kingdom. Kingdom. £ £ ay £ aS £ 1857 | 27,882,848 | 94,288,759 | 228 1858 | 28,886,839 | 87,721,917 | 24:8 1859 | 30,220,109 | 100,191,420 | 23:2 1860 | 30,837,688 | 105,058,539 | 292-7 1861 | 30,974,525 | 94,128,289 | 24:8 1862 | 31,523,812 | 92,468,452 | 25:4 1868 | 36,211,510 | 110,890,882 | 24:7 1864 | 86,554,913 | 123,894,140 | 92:8 1865 | 87,009,718 | 128,826,007 | 29:3 1866 | 41,449,797 | 147,467,789 | 21:9 1867 | 40,172,280 | 140,789,698 | 99-9 | 1868 | 48,276,648 | 186,401,169 | 24°1 | 1869 | 45,250,638 | 144,703,819 | 23°8 | \ rp ¢ormatioln not available. 1870 | 45,606,785 | 153,980,087 | 22:8 1871 | 48,447,297 | 174,618,865 | 21:7 1872 | 53,222,779 | 203,084,568 | 20°8 1878 | 57,199,098 | 197,965,505 | 22°4 1874 | 60,232,118 | 179,826,008 | 25:1 1875 | 57,928,927 | 165,542,086 | 25:9 1876 | 52,071,239 | 148,567,965 | 26:0 1877 | 51,985,826 | 146,907,289 | 261 1878 | 48,145,873 | 144,708,041 | 25:0 1879 | 47,335,758 | 144,196,005 | 24.7 1880 | 52,600,929 | 170,459,517 | 23°6 1881 | 58;581,539 | 175,441,189 | 25:0 1882 | 58,585,803 | 182,881,359 | 24:3 | 89,884,523 | 25,309,029 | 61:2 | 98,470,826 | 208,190,888 | 32:1 1883 | 55,229,721 | 184,569,752 | 23:0 | 39,989,352 | 25,648,245 | 60-9 | 95,219,073 | 210,217,997 | 312 1884 | 54,407,872 | 178,617,370 | 23:3 | 39,594,208 | 23,848,188 | 62:9 | 94,002,075 | 201,965,508 | 31°8 1885 | 50,517,252 | 162,564,527 | 23°7 | 34,845,778 | 28,518,421 | 59-7 | 85,363,025 | 186,077,948 | 31°5 1886 | 46,125,495 | 166,599,705 | 21-7 | 34,455,430 | 21,778,888 | 61:3 | 80,580,925 | 188,378,538 | 30:0 1887 | 46,023,152 | 175,890,758 | 20°7 | 85,889,715 | 24,009,260 | 59:5 | 81,362,867 | 199,900,018 | 28°9 1888 | 50,211,258 | 184,323,654 | 21:4 | 87,572,768 | 26,469,861 | 58°7 | 87,784,026 | 210,793,515 | 29°4 1889 | 48 251,282 | 200,683,913 | 194 | 39,572,979 | 27,084,505 | 59:4 | 87,824,261 | 227,768,418 | 27-8 1890 | 51,880,718 | 211,649,872 | 19:7 | 87,181,720 | 27,589,818 | 57-4 | 89,012,483 | 239,239,685 | 27-1 1891 | 50,987,444 | 196,247,706 | 20°6 | 36,133,504 | 25,745,064 | 58:4 | 87,120,948 | 221,992,770 | 28:2 1892 | 44,640,564 | 182,565,835 | 19:6 | 87,835,987 | 26,587,830 | 58:7 | 82,476,501 | 209,153,665 | 28°3 1898 | 42,811,028 | 175,948,690 19:4 | 34,858,762 | 24,524,790 | 584 | 76,664,790 | 200,478,480 | 27-7 1894 | 41,618,507 | 174,892,180 | 19:3 | 84,588,586 | 23,191,644 | 59:8 | 76,202,098 | 197,583,774 | 27:8 1895 | 44,661,604 | 181,466,642 | 19:8 | 35,009,277 | 24,694,884 | 58:6 | 79,670,881 | 206,161,526 | 27:9 1896 | 51,822,304 | 188,823,247 | 21:4 | 31,905,570 | 24,828,093 | 56:7 | 83,227,874 | 218,151,340 | 28-1 1897 | 49,851,251 | 184,368,457 | 21:3 | 32,800,648 | 27,153,762 | 54:7 | 82,651,899 | 211,522,219 | 281 1898 | 49,125,872 | 184,233,368 | 21:0 | 32,554,787 | 28,100,011 | 53°7 | 81,680,609 | 212,333,379 | 27°8 1899 | 58,717,477 | 210,774,734 | 20°3 | 84,460,689 | 30,581,758 | 53:0 | 88,178,166 | 241,356,492 | 26°7 | { 7, >> ¥ OY SBS eh ie hated US 49 Table 17 A. Transhipment trade of London and of the United Kingdom. [‘“‘ Trade and Navigation” (1853-70) and “Trade” (1871-99) Returns. | A.—WINES AND SPIRITS. Year. 18538 1854 1855 1856 1857 1858 1859 1860 1861 1862 1863 1864 1865 1866 1867 1868 1869 1870 1871* 1872* 1873* 1874* 1875* 1876* 1877* 1878* 1879* 1880* 1881* 1882* 1883* 1884* 1885* 1886* 1887* 1888* 1889 1890 1891 1892 18938 1894 1895 1896 1897 1898 1899 Imported for transhipment. London. Gallons, 749,996 749,996 601,171 947,817 1,158,129 1,089,584 1,568,230 1,120,722 1,156,768 1,601,254 1,824,461 9.92.1 384 1,884,927 2,455,882 1,955,012 2 618,589 3,291,193 4,077,556 3,418,263 3,204,694. 3,248 195 3,736,582 8,679,471 8,887,275 4,088,225 3,145,291 3,226,974 3,651,326 8,320,157 2,767,518 2,676,055 2,362,147 2,210,328 2,338,270 2,441,748 2,389,664 2,802,842 2,590,739 2,543,170 2,259,198 1,885,161 1,679,686 1,587,658 1,464,531 1,427,831 1,596,180 1,556,922 Rest of United Kingdom. Gallons. 80,326 80,326 83,672 124,295 275,748 155,757 197,017 227,034 258,445 220,996 248,952 256,149 380,885 637,818 571,862 675,680 935,169 1,088,670 664,478 731,616 1,083,875 940,875 709,415 729,899 1,016,635 1,201,058 1,111,297 1,421,617 1.511,780 1,646,993 2,041,314 1,884,165 1,354,452 959,920 877,820 1,001,310 2,807,294 2,587,679 2,176,785 2,421,948 2,508,526 2,236,040 2,532,836 2,361,807 2,518,346 2,669,488 2,489,568 Exported after transhipment. London’s proportion of the London, United Kingdom. per cent. Gallons. 90°3 749,996 90:3 749,996 87:7 601,171 88°4 947,317 80:8 1,158,129 87°5 1,089,584 88:8 1,568,230 83-2 1,120,722 81:7 1,156,768 87:9 1,601,254 88°2 1,824,461 89'7 2,221,384 83°2 1,884,927 79:4. 2,455,882 77:4 1,955,012 79.5 2,618,589 77:9 8,291,198 78:9 4,077,556 83°7 3,418,268 81:4 8,204,694 75:0 3,248,271 79:9 8,734,200 83:8 3,674,044 84:2 3,875,992 79:9 4,024,645 79-4 3,122,838 74:4. 3,222,596 72:0 3,635,686 68:7 8,289,708 62:7 2,735,208 56-7 2.662,525 556 2,352,017 G20 2,199,547 70:9 2,380,229 736 2.499, 847 70°5 2,366,813 50:0 2,760,800 50:0 2.551,015 539 2,502,660 483 2,205,502 49,9 1,886,313 42:9 1,672,672 385 1,591,736 38:3 1,473,312 36:2 1,430,221 37-4 1,600,981 385 1,555,038 London’s Total for the Reat ot proportion United Kingdom. United Kingdom.| of the Kingdom. Gallons, per cent. Gallons. 80,326 90°3 830,322 80,326 90°3 830,322 83,672 87°7 684,843 124,295 88'°4 1,071,612 275,748 80°8 1,433 877 155,757 87°5 1,245,341 197,017 88'°8 1,765,247 227,034 83:°2 1,347,756 258,445 81°7 1,415,218 220,996 87°9 1,822,250 243,952 88°2 2,068,413 256,149 89°7 2,477,533 380,885 83:°2 2,265,812 637,818 79°4 3,093,700 571,862 77:'4 2,526,874 675,680 79:5 3,294,269 935,169 77'9 4,226,362 1,088,670 78:9 5,166,226 664,478 83°7 4,077,741 731,616 81°4 3,936,310 1,088,799 74:9 4,332,070 942.707 798 4,676,907 714,842 83°7 4,588,886 741,182 83'°9 4,617,174 1,030,215 79'6 5,054,860 1,223,511 71:9 4,346,349 1,115,675 74:3 4,338,271 1,487,257 wad Bae’ 5,072,943 1,542,179 681 4,831,887 1,679,303 62°0 4,414,511 2,054,844 56 4 4,717 369 1,894,295 yeahh: 4,246,312 1 365,233 61°7 3,564,780 967,961 70°7 3,298,190 896,716 730 3,319,563 1,024,161 69:8 3,390,974 2,849,336 49:2 5,610,136 2,627,408 49:3 5,178,418 2,217,295 53°0 4,719,955 2,475,639 471 4,681,141 2,507,374 42'°9 4,393,687 2,248,054 42:7 3,915,726 2,528,758 38'6 4,120,494 2,353,026 38'5 3,826,338 2,515,956 36°2 3,946,177 2,664,687 37°5 4,265,618 2,491,452 38°4 4,046,490 * Excluding Wine which is not mentioned in the Returns for these years. Sree Sa Saat “Sy 50 Table 17 B- Transhipment trade of London and of the United Kingdom. [“‘ Trade and Navigation” (1853-70) and ‘“ Trade” (1874-99) Returas. | B-KEA: Imported for transhipment. Exported after transhipment. Year. London’s London’s ee a seh Rest of proportion Rest of SROPOE SI Bode oa London. United Kingdom. A Doe London. United Ringtone ee Kingdom. Kingdom. lbs. lbs. per cent. lbs. lbs. per cent. lbs. 1853 237,511 12,208 95°1 237,511 12,208 95°1 249,719 1854 237,511 12,208 95'1 237,511 12,208 95:1 249,719 1855 127,697 9,340 93°2 127,697 9,340 93°2 137,037 1856 144,796 17,934 89:0 144,796 17,934 89:0 162,730 1857 20,166 49,628 28°9 20,166 49,628 28°9 69,794 1858 215,350 68,797 77:1 215,350 63,797 77:1 279,147 1859 276,994 33,477 89°2 276,994 83,477 89'2 310,471 1860 158,781 13,568 91:9 158,781 13,568 91:9 167,299 1861 581,711 10,618 98:2 581,711 10,618 982 592,329 1862 635,552 79,790 88:8 635,552 79,790 88'8 715,342 1863 1,831,664 92,423 93:5 1,831,664 92,423 93°5 1,424,087 1864 828,910 120 100°0 828,910 120 100:0 829,080: 1865 653,196 6,350 99:0 653,196 6,350 99:0 659,546 1866 691,264 7,165 99:0 691,264 7,165 99:0 698,429 1867 1,288,576 81,175 97:6 1,288,576 31,175 97°6 1,319,751 1868 2,323,118 129,437 94:7 2,323,118 129,437 94°7 2,452,550 1869 8,703,240 16,874 99°5 8,703,240 16,874 99°5 8,720,114 a 8,887,339 25,837 99'3 3,887,339 25,837 99°3 8,913,176 71 1872 Information | not available. 1873 1874 7,909,484 952,980 89:2 5,805,504 3,556,960 59:9 8,862,464 1875 11,125,136 217,657 98:0 6,690,436 4,652,357 59:0 11,342,793 1876 5,977,710 260,714 95°8 4,269,111 1,969,313 68:4 6,238,424 1877 12,964,048 49,958 99'6 9,879,320 3,184,681 75°9 13,014,001 1878 7,878,320 425,316 94:9 7,735,487 563,199 93:2 8,298,636 1879 8,083,618 249.721 971 8,030,788 295,601 96°4 8,326,339 1880 11,403,090 140,558 98'8 10,761,850 781,798 93°2 11,548,648 1881 10,825,556 214,914 97.9 10,325.556 214,914 97°9 10,540,470 1882 6,904,104 848,692 95°2 6,899,144 858,652 95°1 7,252,796 1883 6,602,761 608,455 91°6 6,596,074 610,142 91:5 7,206,216 1884 7,402,350 229,798 97:0 7,330,170 301,978 96:0 7,632,148 1885 10,637,236 169,601 98-4 10,577,086 229.801 97°9 10,806,837 1886 10,227,005 168,674 98:4. 10,210,205 185,474 98:2 10,395,679 1887 9,619,136 582,875 94:8 9,608,045 543,966 94'6 10,152,011 1888 16,319,666 872,946 97°8 16,308,257 884,355 97°7 16,692,612 1889 15,390,087 359,220 97°7 15,390,187 859,120 97°7 15,749,307 1890 9,704,800 502,776 95°0 9,704,800 502,776 95:0 10,207,576 1891 7,837,508 397,298 95:2 7,830,108 404,698 95°1 8,284,806 1892 7,889,254 697,245 91:9 7,894,254 692,245 91:9 8,586,499 1893 7,098,278 523,775 93:1 7,093,278 523,775 93°71 7,617,048 1894 6,952,482 613,140 91:9 6,952,482 613,140 91:9 7,565,622 1895 7,090,195 919,971 88°5 7,069,520 940,646 88°3 8,010,166 1896 8,359,456 923,478 90°1 8,359,462 923,472 90°71 9,282,934 1897 11,814,998 1,519,482 88:2 11,814,998 1,519,482 88:2 12,834,425 1898 8,020,056 976,609 89°1 8,020,056 976,609 89°71 8,996,665 1899 13,515,114 852,295 94:0 18,511,594 855.815 94:0 14,867,409 Year. 1853 1854 1855 1856 1857 1858 1859 1860 1861 1862 1863 1864 1865 1866 1867 1868 1869 1870 1871 1872 18738 1874 1875 1876 1877 1878 1879 1880 1881 1882 1883 1884 1885 1886 1887 1888 1889 1890 1891 1892 1898 1894 1895 1896 1897 1898 1899 51 Table 17 C. Transhipment trade of London and of the United Kingdom. [‘‘ Trade and Navigation” (1853-70) and “ Trade” (1871-99) Returns. | C.-TOBACCO AND CIGARS. Imported for transhipment. London. lbs. 171,648 171,648 152,636 2,968,532 1,813,209 707,178 1,578,501 887,347 1,001,265 1,107,918 1,059,638 9,118,715 1,290,357 931,042 1,240,451 1,885,144 1,309,508 2,609,222 2.659,688 6,239,204 9,396,866 11,136,661 11,875,508 8,040,952 11,818,132 10,942,369 6,457,485 12,758,724 17,618,491 17,147,322 17,198,933 14,487,588 14,518,231 15,271,929 8,429,558 17,220,239 12,106,752 7,522,867 9,765,385 7,156,367 8,909,244 7,193,964 5,760,492 8,838,786 12,778,968 8,735,512 8,283,988 Rest of , United Kingdom. lbs. 15,269 15,269 28,661 281,248 103,479 77,186 200,978 174,049 179,302 96,847 892,405 1,771,236 814,341 804,442 688,809 1,034,078 8,095,902 5,895,935 4,275,905 9,891,809 14,802,588 14,845,471 13,246,374 10,621,632 7,154,307 9,480,666 7,136,058 6,034,006 5,406,128 2,925,976 3,732,377 8,609,701 4,861,758 4,585,492 5,249,880 5,879,725 9,822,561 8,078,903 7,870,319 7,858,221 7,865,670 5,554,451 7,520,909 7,740,876 11,165,807 15,783,014 15,348,610 London’s proportion of the United Kingdom. per cent. Exported after transhipment. London, lbs. 171,648 171,648 152,636 2,968,532 1,813,209 707,178 1,578,501 887,847 1,001,265 1,107,918 1,059,688 2,118,715 1,290,357 931,042 1,240,451 1,885,144 1,309,508 2,609,222 2,659,638 6,239,204 9,396,866 11,426,311 11,854,191 8,014,967 11,799,578 10,982,125 6,429,285 12,746,679 17,592,745 17,140,528 17,318,848 14,460,238 14,515,289 15,498,850 8,895,874 17,298,080 12,866,115 9,373,411 12,478,885 8,452,741 10,128,582 7,584,256 6,237,752 9,618,836 18,556,827 8,730,112 3,283,988 Rest of United Kingdom. lbs. 15,269 15,269 28,661 281,248 103,479 77,186 200,978 174,049 179,302 96,847 892,405 1,771,236 814,341 804,442 688,809 1,034,078 8,095,902 5,895,935 4,275,905 9,391,809 14,802,588 14,555,821 13,267,686 10,647,617 7,172,861 9,490,910 7,164,258 6,046,051 5,481,874 2,232,770 3,612,967 8,587,001 4,364,700 4,364,071 5,283,559 5,806,884 8,563,198 6,228,359 5,156,869 6,561,847 6,646,382 5,164,159 7,048,649 6,960,826 10,382,948 15,788,414 15,348,610 London’s of the United Kingdom. per cent. Total for the proportion | United Kingdom. lbs. 186,917 186,917 181,297 3,249,780 1,916,688 784,359 1,779,479 1,061,396 1,180,567 1,204,765 1,952,048 3,884,951 2,104,698 1,735,484 1,929,260 2,919,222 4,405,410 8,005,157 6,935,548 15,631,018 24,199,454 25,982,132 25,121,877 18 662,584 18,972,439 20,423,035 13,598,548 18,792,730 23,024,619 19,873,298 20,981,310 18,047,239 18,879,989 19,857,421 18,679,488 23,099,964 21,429 318 15,601,770 17,635,704 15,014,588 16,774,914 12,748,415 13,281,401 16,579,662 23,939,770 24,518,526 18,632,598 ee ee a 52 Table 17 D. Transhipment trade of London and of the United Kingdom. (‘‘ Trade” (1871-99) Returns. | D.—OTHER ARTICLES. (i.e., in addition to wine and spirits, tea, tobacco and cigars, set out in tables A, B, and C.) Exported after transhipment. Imported for transhipment. Total for the Year. sear siportion | United Kingd Ratat proportion Rest of proportion i ingdom., London. United Kingda allrone oe United Kingdom. oh te Kingdom. Kingdom. £& £ per cent. £ £ per cent. £ 1853—70 | The informatio|n in these years| is not available in a form| for comparison |with succeleding years. 1871 2,369,202 7,138,820 24'9 2,346,192 7,161,830 24°7 9,508,022 1872 3,344,958 8,342,463 28°6 3,290,356 8,397,065 28:'2 11,687,421 1873 2,999,088 8,382,613 26°3 2,983,943 8,397,758 26:2 11,381,701 1874 1,817,841 6,415,297 22:1 1,822,882 6,410,256 22:1 8,233,138 1875 2,383,656 6,504,583 26'8 2,317,342 6,570,897 26°1 8,888,239 1876 2,005,502 5,776,845 25'8 1,940,286 5,841,561 24'9 7,781,847 1877 2,694,111 6,281,873 30°0 2,635,605 6,340,379 29°4 8,975,984 1878 2,245,867 6,141,200 26'8 2,209,113 6,177,954 26'3 8,387,067 1879 2,455,672 5,989,528 29°1 2,489,209 6,005,991 28°9 8,445,200 1880 2,679,607 6,666,964 28:7 2,650,675 6,695,896 28°4 9,346,571 1881 3,044,800 6,558,375 sity 2,991,699 6,611,476 312 9,603,175 1882 3,034,627 6,271,840 32°6 2,987,695 6,318,772 32°1 9,306,467 1883 3,222,856 5,801,509 S57 3,262,552 5,761,813 36°1 9,024,865 1884 3,494,683 5,861,824 37°S 3,490,708 5,865,299 37°3 9,356,007 1885 3,578,372 4,636,803 43°6 3,633,098 4,582,077 44:2 8,215,175 1886 8,822,517 4,251,396 47°3 3,874,964 4,198,949 48:0 8,073 913 1887 8,575,315 4,169,277 46:2 3,581,124 4,163,468 46:2 7,744,592 1888 8,392,985 4,295,728 44°1 3,440,997 4,247,716 448 7,688,713 1889 2,210,586 3,920,381 36:0 2,286,345 3,844,622 37°3 6,130,967 1890 2,393,570 4,009,141 37°4 2,462,243 3,940,468 38'5 6,402,711 1891 2,454,088 4,111,179 37'4 2,576,102 3,989,115 39°2 6,565,217 1892 2,846,533 4,752,802 37°5 2,958,017 4,641,318 389 7,599,335 1893 3,075,624 5,721,383 35'0 8,381,698 5,415,309 38°4 8,797,007 1894 2,361,579 5,008,719 32:0 2,534,351 4,835,947 34°4 7,370,298 1895 3,400,609 5,071,143 40°1 3,619,170 4,861,582 42°6 8,471,752 1896 2,771,503 4,723,829 37°0 3,021,206 4,474,126 40°3 7,495,332 1897 2,875,000 4,828,380 5 dirs: 3,035,714 4,667,666 39°4 7,703,380 1898 2,433,657 4,404,442 35°6 2,446,872 4,391,227 35°8 6,838,099 1899 2,170,951 5,794,006 A273 2,169,370 5,795,587 27:2 7,964,957 E.—TOTAL VALUE. (For the years for which this information is given in the “Trade” Retwrns.) Total value of all goods imported for Table 17—E, Total value of all goods exported after transhipment. transhipment. V ear London’s London’s a a a ace Rest of proportion Rest of proportion | United Kingdom, London, United Kingdom. See toons United Kingdom. Tove Kingdom. Kingdom. £& £ per cent. £ £& per cent. £ 1896 4,105,591 6,160,788 40:0 4,398,756 5,867,623 42:8 10,266,379 1897 4,431,888 6,320,725 41:2 4,629,965 6,122,148 43:1 | 10,752,108 1898 8,849,032 5,948,603 39°3 3,867,584 5,925,051 39°5 9,792,635 1899 8,342,757 7,448,855 31:0 8,340,279 7,446,333 31:0 | 10,786,612 ee eaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaacaaacaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaammmmmmmmmmmmmamammal the United Kingdom. ton with London.) vigation and Shipping” (1871, MAAN Fore NAS SS eS Se eats rot rt oe | \aach 8 pamela Total. On ae aod amp e Coast- wise ens sider Fie a a, aon oo a3 Go HH Ss) 0) ew Cle 6 AOOOd ANAnANNN Foreign. 110 10 20 10 Total. PDD D ret yest et ret DODOG OO EH SESH SE HHPH PESSH DL >t Snare rc SCOMSH ANn nr PSOSO MANNA ee a se ee ae ee ee eee ees 1 ae oa: De hyper mnt pe el deel Ses Neel ice Mahe (Sral’ Sprite Mssiectinn! ~ erlienbten | tener © Reelin bienbienlil (bition Mes iieah Cpe en ex tien s. ent hlies ane Se NES rsa, “Meri ae ee hae le ap Stara | ee Sse eg = Spi es eae Pe Sa: TC aiay Sas pata sos, se 4 ogee 2 5 a ee et pa Pair) oe Table 18. Ya we + eset re E> SbE> be Ee aoaooe { Total. |Poreign Middlesbrough. Coast- wise. ne! o 4 oO ~ (=| i) Foreign. Total. ad sHAd 10 P2OSOD PRIS e . oD H 19 CO = OO oOnA oH 1d CO tk DD On NOH 1d co b= D OnNwmos 1D > Onn AAAAN AN st oO H So oe ee | Harwich. Fee Lee Toe | See hem Se eo | 53 AAAIA AAs mm NANe Dover. wise. Hntered. Coast- Ba ° 5 i a s ic} . B as! B ae : a a TOA CON = SF & a i) o s g io} F = ro ss ro) ates q 22 OD 19 19 19 S Eas SSS) & s) ; Oo z So 2 S & g io} a 190 oD ad g a0 a Go co <0 go gd > oP ao Total. fron Coast- wise. (The ports in this table are the ports which are considered to be in competition with London.) [Calculated on the figures given in the “Trade and Navigation” (1853-70) and the “Navigation and Shipping” (1871-99) Returns.] Foreign. Proportion which the Shipping of certain Ports bears to the Shipping of the United Kingdom. Folkestone. Total. wise. Coast- 2S) eel SH aD Sof tot yt ee Sat eae) Me BE Be eH Sy Yoyo yy MPa! EY RSS Newhaven. Coast- wise, Foreign. Total. Coast- wise. Southampton. maANnns sone ian ie ie! DH DD reseer re i=] & eee ese a ere Oi Eo ORO EoD er rrr oo p ees ee ae Sb Pe 4 ao eS eee eee 3 ia Se erate aera ie: Cort ew Meh Se ratese dace, 10D OD OD oD oD OD CO SH OD CO OD OD SH sH sH SH 19 29 19 SH SH SH SH XH 1 =H SH Dade 4 8 Se De ee ee eee eS es pif rie at fee cf sa} & DD HDADDOD HHBOIG FOOND OHRDHF MENADH WMHOHWKrF HNORDD SCwwoODM BOMAD® 8 AN MHAMO ABOSHR ADKKD LVwoMDH HWHAwHDHD HHtttdD BDEDOH BDODDDHO HOdSHoOH FS MO cen ANDODA AAAAN AAAagaN ATACAN AACKTAN AKAAAT ACANA ANaag i OH ISOErDOD OANDH WOr-DD COANDH WHOrFDD OHANDH Nes neetce Sowa a Q > a NO — “Io < pte) t ES 919 19181919 1 OHSSHS SHOSSS SERLK LEEK BHODDD BDHODDD HHOHH HOSKS MY OD DONDDH DHDDH DONDDH DHODHDH DHDDD DHDDDHDDH BDBHDDD HBHHDDHH BHBHHDDDO rir ween mn nn re meee es Sess Sc eB es Oe | ee ed et et et rnannrc eseretrer be Hh (Oo oe | 5b Table 19. Population of Greater London and of the United Kingdom, and London’s proportion of the Kingdom. Greater London Greater London’s Year, (Metropolitan and United Kingdom. | proportion of the City Police Districts). United Kingdom. Per cent. 1801 1,114,569 15,717,287 7: 1806 1,214,702 16,785,146 7-2 1811 1,823,830 17,926,580 74 1816 1,458,671 19,352,702 7-5 1821 1,596,247 20,893,584 7-6 1826 1,748,175 22,406,110 7-8 1831 1,903,628 24,028,584 7:9 1836 2,062,771 25,328,959 81 1841 2,935,220 26,709,456 8:4 1846 2,447,808 26,961,010 91 1851 2,680,604 27,868,736 | 9:8 1856 2,989,189 28,105,264 10:5 1861 3,222,720 28,927,485 111 1866 8,538,690 30,158,825 11-7 1871 5,885,641 31,484,661 12:3 1876 4,808,666 33,123,736 13-0 1881 4,766,661 34,884,848 13-7 1886 5,182,127 36,258,846 14:3 1891 5,633,806 37,732,922 14:9 1896 6,124,853 39,311,479 156 55 A.—EXPENDITURE AND REVENUE Total ascertained expenditure and revenue Year 1898— London and India Docks— Joint Committee Z- : London and St. Katharine Company Hast and West India Company Total London and India Docks Millwall Docks ... eat Surrey Commercial Docks Year 1899— London and India Docks— Joint Committee ae aoe & London and St. Katharine Company Hast and West India Company © Total London and India Docks Millwall Docks ... HY Surrey Commercial Docks Total 1899 ... Expenditure. Rep ee Lighter ee. a i t expenses. | expenses. | other service | expences. | Total. | Rents, charges. 1 2 3 4 5 6 £& & £& £& £ £ 786,233 a 94,465 | 9,959 | 890,657 | 27,347 ie = a fen Se Ay ..| 786,233 a 94,465 J00 890,657 | 27,388 : 124,291 a 6,226 1,493 132,010 830 be. 29,834 | 132,618 16,774 2,746 181,972 ahs 1 1 Total 1898 1,072,976 117,465 | 14,198 | 1,204,639 | 28,218 789,965 a 102,549 | 10,144 902,658 | 27,096 oe ak = a = 32 7 789,965 a 102,549 | 10,144 902,658 | 27,128 189,625 a 11,368 3,042 154,535 1,677 45,821 | 130,247 sci 2,802! 178870; — 1,105,658 113,917 | 16,488 | 1,236,063 | 28,805 —————— SSS ay Year 1898— London and India Docks— Joint Committee... London and St. Katharine Company a East and West India Company Total London and India Docks Millwall Docks Bez Surrey Commercial Docks Total. Year 1899— London and India Docks— Joint Committee London and St. Katharine Company _ Hast and West India Company Total London and India Docks Millwall Docks : on Surrey Commercial Docks Total 1899 .., Balance Expenditure for special purposes, of revenue aes fe 4 - f col. aw a6). ana. fee Directors’ fees. ae Total, 17 ae 19 20 21 £& £ £ & £ 530,392 3,409 3,600 Me 7,009 — 2,033 oe (f) i. © == 7,662 1,616 (f) — 1,616 ..| 520,697 5,025 3,600 8,625 78,270 187 1,300 — 1,487 102,312 669 (f) = 669 701,279 5,881 4,900 ea 10,781 546,822 3,489 3,600 — 7,089 — 13,240 63 (f) — 63 4 a B15 60 (7) = 60 525,967 | 3.612 3,600 ss 7,212 38,425 1,812 1,900 2,340 6,052 101,911 813 CP) —_ 813 666,303 6,237 5,500 2,340 14,077 ee (a) Warehouse expenses are not stated separately in the accounts and are included in column 1, (6) Including rent, rates and all other expenditure. (c) Including interest on cash balances, &c., and all other revenue. (d) Including charges on goods, 56 Table 20 A. oF Dock CompaNIEs. on docks for the years 1898 and 1899. Revenue. Balance of Rates, taxes, | Manage- Dock charges Warehouse Total paar ae ie Pee vaitare: on shipping. Petascodl aciae scenes Bere. gb ek toa on goods. 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 5 16 £ £ £ £ £ £ 92,298 | 167,043 | 1,177,845 448,993 |1,165,280| 1,614,273 | 48,452 | 45,012 | 1,707,787 | 530,392 as 14,3286 14,328 — 12,295c 12,295 | -— 2,033 ha 8.312 8,353 ate rds 420 691 | — 7,662 92,298 | 189,683 | 1,200,026 448,993 1,165,280) 1,614,273 | 48,723 | 57,727 | 1,720,723 | 520,697 14,285 | 11,676 | 158,801 | 919,914 7,906 | 237,071 | 78,270 24,201 | 33,368 239,541 267,548 318,747 | 14,574 8,532 341,853 | 102,312 130,784 | 234,727 | 1,598,368 2,152,234 74,165 | 2,299,647 | 701,279 100,420 | 169,302 | 1,199,476 478,006 |1,171,256) 1,649,262 | 50,567 | 46,469 | 1,746,298 | 546,822 5,076 8,920 13,996 -~ —- -- — 756 756 | —13,240 _ 8,284 8,316 ai = — 204 497 701 | — 7,615 105,496 | 186,506 | 1,221,788 478,006 |1,171,256, 1,649,262 | 50,771 | 47,722 | 1,747,755 | 525,967 16,507 | 11,140 183,859 59,401e} 144,386e 203,787 9,961 8,536 222,284 38,425 26,141 | 34,341 239,352 54,523 | 263,307; 317,830 | 14,766 8,667 341,263 | 101,911 148,144 | 231,987 | 1,644,999 591,930 |1,578,949| 2,170,879 | 75,498 | 64,925 | 2,811,802 666,303 Balan f a: siaaie _ Add Deduct Interest Bate of dividends ie etal Averae@.| Balance of revenue available for | terest on | interest on on Rate of | Dividends interest rate of unexpended (+) dividends Peon ana | #0ating loan interest, | on capital. _ and rape or overdrawn (—) and Tei 2 ee ear loans. capital. Bees a dividends, capital 22 28 a4 25 26 27 23 | 29° 30 31 32 923,383 — 18,943 6,875 23 — — — 6,875 2°75 — 2,033 130,251 |4, 33 to 3) 216,817 4.5 23 |347,068 3°22 —9278| 6299 | — {108,713 | 4,32,3| 37,952] 4 2 | 146,665 a 2a ; 512,072 6,299 18,943 | 245,839 3°45 | 254,769 2°40 500,608 2°82 — 1,180 76,783 _— 1,546 | 24,573 5, 4 41,122 |5,23,27 1 65,695 3°22 + 9,542 101,643 4,246 — 6,300 45 98,013 6, 5 6 | 104,313 5°69 + 1,576 690,498 10,545 20,489 erie | 3°56 | 393,904 2°84 670,616 | 3:10 + 9,988 | 539,733 -- 22,098 5,844 2¢ Se mee a 5,844 2°75 —13,303| 411,822 — |130,599 |4, 32 to 3 216,817 | 44 = |347,416 Bea - — 17,675 9,710 — 107,377 4,3 50,621 + 3 | 157,998 2°29 see eee ee SS ae ees er Fe 7 We See ea eee eee 518,755 21,532 22,098 | 243,820 3°4 267,438 2°49 511,258 2°86 + 6,931 32,373 — 1,052 | 24,573 5, 4 — as = 924,573 1:17 + 6,748 101,098 3,986 — 6,300 45 106,639 6,5 6 112,939 o°72 — 7,855 652,226 25,518 23,150 | 274,693 3°52 =| 374,077 2°64 648,770 2°95 + 5,824 (e) These amounts are not given separately in the accounts, and the figures given here are estimates. ks. (f/) Apparently included in salaries and establishment. The charges on goods are estimated on the tonnage which entered the docks in 1899 at the average rate per ton paid on shipping entering the Surrey Commercial B.—EXPENDITURE UPON AND REVENUE FROM Expenditure. Upon Port of London only. Common to Port of London and outports Salaries, Payments for} Payments to Pilot Year. | Pilot cutters : pilotage North Total pensions, om Law at Gravesend | Cutters at | into and out |Channel pilots | expenditure | superannuation, ce and parlia- Total. (channel), | @tavesend| “of Port —|onacccount of | on pilotage. | &c. (Trinity | °*Pemses- mentary. (river). | of London. |*Sunk” cutters. House Fund). 1 2 38 5 6 8 9 £& £ £ £ £& £& £& £ £& 1889 730 568 | 185,788 | 1,320 | 188406] 8,709 779 13 | 9,501 1890 770 610 137,678 1,141 140,199 8,790 664 141 9,595 1891 878 656 | 134,612 | 1,126 | 137,972] 9,172 567 46 | 9,785 1892 945 648 132,425 937 184,955 9,026 630 26 9,682 1893 810 621 128,409 942 180,782 8,790 608 +) 9,407 1894 1,843a 996 135,589 1,105 139,533 8,675 628 16 9,319 1895 1,245 679 | 187,702 896 | 140,522} 8,470 620 28 | 9118 1896 910 w3l 142,278 969 144,888 8,625 515 305 9,445 1897 860 1,043 | 142,353 954 | 145.910] 8,934 638 8 | 9.580 1898 860 641 145,525 954 147,980 8,646 5085 6 9,187 1899 810 680 | 143,326 900 | 145'716] 9,526 527 — | 10,053 C.—EXPENDITURE AND REVENUE OF THAMES i.—Expenditure on and revenue from dredging, Expenditure. Year. Locks, River Dredging. Mooring. Wreck. | Harbour. paths oa Piers. purifica- Total. shores, Xe. non. 1 2 3 4 5 6 iG 8 £ eo & £ £ & & £& 1889... 15,990 9,097 2,728 8,040 5,954 7,090 — 49,399 1890.. 18,305 6,707 3,999 7,057 6,652 8,802 — 51,522 1891 .. 16,306 | 9,695 5,391 | 8407] 6022] 8579|/ — | 54400 1892... 13,206 9,683 2,228 7,383 4,768 9,406 — 46,674 LSOS 23 13,999 9,480 2,469 8,560 5,406 | 10,538 — 50,452 1894... 11,274 | 16,602e ‘ 8526 | 7,413 | 8,882 852 | 53,549 1895... 12,844 | 12,450 9.293 | 8177| 8019! 6233| 2165 | 52181 1896... 15,999 9,471 4,607 8,170 7,624 9,678 1,962 | 57,511 1897... 12,329f| 7,459 9957 | 8088! 8877) 7,088] 1,993 | 55,791 1898... 17,036f| 10,544 5,072 7,518 8,364 | 11,677 2,009 | 62,220 1800 re 27,238 8,926 5,263 7,605 6,798 | 10,599 2,113 542 ii.— Balance of revenue available for special Special expenditure. Balance of revenue Tex. | SaREreced | Saas ; paehnwieniary Other. Total 19 20 21 22 £& £& £ £& 1889 9,392 1,972 2,079 4,051 1890 7,704 1,361 4,071 432 1891 8,110 2,169 141 2,310 1892 10,779 1,375 5D Ad 6,919 1893 22,626 1,910 12,085 13,945 1894. 13,674 9.791 9.616 19,407 1895 16,755 662 4,659 5,321 1896 18,782 1,011 1,990 3,001 1897 25,652 741 _ 741 1898 19,427 872 — 872 1899 9,800 997 = 997 (a) Including part purchase money of new steam launch. PILOTAGE AND TRINITY House ADMINISTRATION, Table 20 B. Revenue. From Port of London only. Common to Port of London and outports. Year, Amount earoaice ; Total Interest | pee ee : Interest received for | House (landing| charges on | on invest- ths Coe licenses, and | on invest- | _ Other Total pilotage of money for shipping. ments, se poundage on | ments, | Tecelpts. | revenue. vessels. |Sunk ” cutters). earnings, 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 £ £ £ £ £ £& £& £& £ 137,286 1,168 138,454 195 138,649 6,138 3,169 386 | 9,693 | 1889 139,166 1,122 140,288 202 140,490 6,327 2,600 359 | 9,286 | 1890 136,090 1,094 187,184 180 137,364 6,190 2,031 373 | 9,094 | 1891 133,872 1,031 134,903 180 135.083 6,149 2,568 | 2,106 | 10,823 | 1892 129,839 945 130,784 179 130,963 5,975 2,557 370 | 8,902 | 1593 137,147 1,020 138,167 164 138,331 6,275 2,538 392 | 9,205 | 1894 139,294: 977 140,271 193 140,464 6,300 2,677 483 | 9,460 | 1895 143,953 1,038 144,991 193 145,184 6,307 2,687 453 | 9,44'7 | 1896 144.070 974 145,044 198 5,237 6,410 2,682 493 | 9,585 | 1897 147,237 926 148.163 193 148,356 6,471 2,682 493 | 9,646 | 1898 145,067 836 145,903 193 146,096 6,397 2,682 486 | 9,565 | 1899 CONSERVANCY (LOWER NAVIGATION). Table 20 C. mooring, and other navigation works. Revenue. Establish- Charges on | pier dues, Total Repayments, ae es Year. ment and Super- Total Tonnage | Water ae tolls, fees, revenue penalties, Total revenue, working | annuation. |expenditure. dues, ee ae licences, from rents and revenue. expenses, (deceit &e. taxation. | other receipts. 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 £ £& £ £& £ £& £ £ £ £ 16,016 2,186 | 67,601 | 43,437 2,485 20,819 66,741 10,252 76,993 9,392 1889 18,299 2,202 | 72,023 | 44,953 2,500 21,638 69,091 10,636 79,727 7,704 1890 17,709 2,234 | 74,843 | 44,666 2,500 21,151 68,317 14,136 453 8,110 1891 20.1745 2,379 | 69,227 | 46,082 2,500 22,919 71,501 8,505 80,006 10,779 1892 26,590c 2,335 | 79,877 | 45,976 2,200 22,353 70,529 31,474d 102,003 22,626 1893 17,694 2,149 | 73,892 | 48,861 2,800 23,134 74,795 12,271 87,066 13,674 1864 16,479 2,127 | 70,787 | 49,342 3,500 23,240 76,082 11,460 87,542 16,755 1895 16,696 2,220 | 46,427 | 52,837 3,725 26,996 83,558 11,651 95,209 18,782 1896 18,564 1,962 | 76,3817 | 54,436 3,900 27,663 85,599 16,370 101,969 25,652 1897 18,868 1,978 | 83,06 55,818 3,500 29,219 88,537 13,956 102,493 19,427 1898 19,584 2,642 | 90,768 | 55,729 3,900 29,547 88,776 11,792 100,568 9,800 1899 purposes and for interest and repayment of debt. Balance available Total interest Balance of revenue for interest and Interest. Repayment and unexpended (+) | year repayment of debt. of debt. repayment. or overdrawn (—). 23 24 25 26 27 £ £ & £ £ 5,341 3,363 223 3,586 + 1,755 1889 2.272 3,325 288 3,613 — 1,341 1890 5.800 3,314 — 3,014 + 2,486 1891 3,860 3,314 1,155 4,469 — 609 1892 8,681 3,314 — 3,314 + 5,367 1893 — 5,733 3,314 — 3,314 — 9,047 1894 11,484 3,996 1,251 5,247 + 6,187 1895 15.781 3,000 1,197 4,197 + 11,584 1896 94.911 3,000 1,175 4,175 + 20,736 1897 18,555 3,000 1,175 4,1'75 + 14,380 1898 8,803 3,000 L175 4.175 + 4,628 1899 (6) Including £1,663 on account of new offices. (c) Including £7,714 on account of new offices. (d) Including £19,687 for sale of stock. (e) Including wreck expenses, (f) In the years 1897 and 1898 there was further expenditure on dredging out of capital as follows— 1897 vee : 14,500 - - £10,968 18 6 3,531 1 6 59 D.— EXPENDITURE AND REVENUE OF PorRT SANITARY Expenditure. Year Maintenance | Maintenance | Bt: Salaries € premises, | 22d hire of | Miscellaneou Teoal Total Wages. and rae rates, steam hospital ee enstd Other. expenditure. establishment | “t, 505 gc. |launches,hulks) expenses, : eG and boats. 1 74 8 4 5 6 7 8 £& £& & £& £ 3 £& & 1889 953 1,568 139 234 50 18 7 2,969 1890 1,038 1,690 189 192 82 10 7 3,208 1891 1,104 1,593 78 262 116 9 323 3,485 1892 1,118 1,968 512 (a) 127 637 (b) 4, 59 4,425 1893 1,758 3,378 338 3,318 (c) 218 83 194 9,287 1894. 2,044 3,197 692 (d) 666 265 222 131 4,217 1895 2,493 3,399 236 693 42 69 _— 6,932 1896 2,208 4,100 132 1,095 (e) 61 32 ee 7,628 1897 2,192 3,681 149 639(f) 34 4 4 6,706 1898 2,514 3,669 265 483 —— 20 8 6,959 1899 2,683 3,658 110 833 39 39 30 7,392 E.—SuMMARY OF ASCERTAINED Revenue. he eer: Charges on purposes. shipping and Other revenue. Total revenue. goods. 1 On 3 4 & & £& £ Year 1898— Dock Companies... ae 1,598,868 2,152,234. 147,413 2,299,647 Trinity House and Pilotage 47,980 148,163 193 148,356 Thames Conservancy 83,066 55,818 46,675 102,493 Port Sanitary Authority 6,959 47 208 955 Total 1.896373 | 2.356.202 194,489 | 2,550,751 Year 1899— Dock Companies... ae 1,644,999 2,170,879 140,423 2,311,302 Trinity House and Pilotage 145,716 145,903 193 146,096 Thames Conservancy f 90,768 55,729 44,839 100,568 Port Sanitary Authority 7,392 89 262 351 Total 1,888,875 2,372,600 185,717 2,008,317 (a) Including £440 for erection of smallpox pavilion. (6) Including £478 for disinfector, &c. (c) Including £1,829 for new launch, and £548 for purchase and alteration of hulk. (d) Including £242 for erection of boatman’s house. 60 Table 20 D, AutuHority (Ciry or Lonpon Corporation). Revenue. ig Balance of expenditure Year Charges on vessels Vees under Other fees Repayments defrayed out of cre dis or; Canal Boats Act.| and charges. and all other. Total revenue, City estates isinfection, cc, 3 10 11 12 13 14 £& £ ES HS & £& —- 10 — 16 96 2,943 1889 os 6 1 8] 88 3.120 1890 — 6 — 183 189 3,296 1891 — 2 2 54 58 4,367 1892 — — 2 220 229 9,065 1893 — 8 3 37 48 7,169 1894 _ 2 1 154 157 6,775 1895 —_ 2 2 148 152 7,476 1896 — 7 3 118 128 6,578 1897 47 10 1 197 255 6,704 1898 89 3 32 227 351 7,041 1899 Table 20 E. EXPENDITURE UPON PorT AND Docks IN 1898 and 1899. Bal f : revene = A ah gates peices : Balance of Bvellablo FOE} suxpendivure | pajance of | 1 dadd| #vailable for | 7 t ™ Total revenue un- special pur | forspecial | “Teyenue. | interest on | TRONGREAME | joan capital. | Dividends. | inforest gna expended (+) interest and oa | on capital. drawn (-) dividends on : capital. 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 fee 16 £ £ £ £ £ £ £ £ £ 701,279 10,781 690,498 |— 9,944 680,554. 276,712 393,904 670,616 - 69 O35 376 — 376 (9) 3746 — —- -- + 376 19,427 872 18,555 (9) 18,555 4,175(h)| 9 — 4,175(h)| + 14,380 — 6,704 — — 6,704 == — 6,704 a, 4 oacoes — 6,704 714,378 11,653 | 702,725 |— 9,944 692,781 | 280,887(h)| 393,904 | 674,'791(h)} + 17,990 666,303 14,077 652,226 |+ 2,368 654,594 274,693 374,077 648,770 |+ 5,824 380 — 380 (9) 380 see: ae == WE 380 9,800 997 8,803 (9) 8,803 | 4,175(h)) 4,175 (h)|+ 4,628 — 7,041 — — 7,041 — — 7,041 —_ — — — 7,041 669,442 15,074 654,368 |+ 2,368 656,736 278,868 374,077 652,945 |+ 3,791 (e) Including £716 for new launch. (f) Including £150 as part purchase money of launch and barge. (g) Interest on cash balances, &c., included in other revenue (col, 3). (A) Including £1,175 repayment. Ae Ach . c 2 : 4 ; é io Ex r a = . ‘fs : we ? % ~ V i 2 rs ‘ Z j o ‘ 2 o seg 2 4 Re eae ES t 7 & - : f ; ae 2 re te eg} Veet . i . “ x , > 4 eS A ‘ Ps ge Cen ee oe: CUE 4 ao y : asf ae - = 1 } : A i af 1s - it be ¥ & > bY > . H % F Ries - : - ‘: p ; ss i. ; : Z * = r = ; j : ‘ Bes ate te A ; F . he “ : “ ; , “ * ‘ by * ' “a x ¥ 2 We i ; i PRE leg ae ead BO ok ae et a ao ported. eer eee o Ww wr? HCO oon 13 15 15 18 o 10 fos} 10 d. 9 Metals and Manufactured [ron and Steel Goods. Lead (Pig) Lead (old) Zinc, sheets casks) Shot (iron) (in | | Copper (in pieces 56 lbs. and over) Steel Tin (in lots of 6 tons) | Cables (chain)...... Copper (old) Iron (sheet and manufactured, packages not ex- ceeding 30 cwts.) Metal, Iron (bar, rod or pig) Metal Rails and old Wire Machinery cultural) (Agri- trical) Manganese Silver (rock) Scoria Cobalt Tin Nickel Ores and Minerals otherwise} (not rated) Tron Slates (roofing, loose) Stone (emery)...... -| Stone (litho) .... CopperandRegulus Stone (Turkey or Hones) Marble blocks, 4 tons and under Marble blocks above 4 tons and not exceeding 10 tons Stone (blood) ...... Marble blocks above’ 10 tons India Rubber, Gum, &e, Gum Kowrie Gutta percha India-rubber blocks: or packages Indian Rubber, loose, in bottles, slabs, or small pieces Tndia Rubber, liquid or solution Classification of the Leather, Skins, Hides. Hides (cuttings)... Leather, tanned Skins (Seal, in casks) Hides merated) Hide waste, and chip pings, loose) Furs, waste of goat, with wool on (cuttings, .| Bones, loose Whale jones, Horn, &e, | (unenu-| Whale Bone and | Fins Hoofs in Butfalo, packages or Bones and Fins | Horns, Ox, Cow, or Buffalo, loose, in eloding counting at landing Hemp, Woollen, Cotton, Fibre and Hair Goods, 8 Sunn (press packed) Hemp (Bast Indian, press packed) Cotton (in bales n exceeding 6 cube to the ewt Hemp (China Japan) Yarn (Cocanada) (in bales, press' packed) Hemp (China or Japan, over 5 and not exceeding 6) cubic feet to ewt.) Hemp (New Zea- land, St. Helena) and Manritius— and cuttings) Linen (American Pilot Duck cloth) Rags (in bales) Fibre(press packed) Hemp (E. Indian, not press packed) Kittool (in bales, 2 ewt. and over) Ratlia fibre Cotton (in bales, above 4 ft, not ex- ceeding 12 ft. cube to the ewt.) Hemp (China and Japan, exceeding} 6 feet per ewt.) Hemp (undressed, press packed) Coir and Yarn (not! press packed) Fibre (Palmyra, in bales of 56 Ibs. and over) Hair (Pigs'’, bales) in Hemp (Baltic, in| bales) Hemp (Kuropean, dressed or un- dressed not press| packed) Hemp (European, dressed, press packed) Yarn (hempen) Coir matting Coir mats Cotton (bales not exceeding 12 ft. cube to the ewt., or in bags or mats) Fibre (not packed) Fibre (Palmyra, in bundles under 56 Ibs.) Tow (N. Zealand) Codilla of hemp} or flax Hair (horse or cow) press) Coir yarn (loose)... Wool (Vigonia) ... Liquids, &¢, Oil (Palm & Cocoa- nut, in casks) |Provisions for Human Oil Seed, in casks) ot} ft. .) | Ol (Lard, in casks) or Oil (Lubricating, | in casks) Oil (Palm, in tanks) Oil (Cocoanut in tanks) Oil (Fusel) (ground Nat,| Chi SSE Gtecrorcares oc) Geena Coir (anwrought,| Ink (in bulk) ...... in bales, press} Oil (Fish, in cases) packed) Coir and Yarn Tuk (in bottles) ... (Castor Camphor, casks) Oil (Olive, in cases or in and jars) Oil (Castor, Cam- phor, Cod Liver, Seed or Nut, in cases) Wool (coney) . Wool (goats ) | Silk, waste ........ Wool (hair or | beards) {Silk (raw thrown) or Dock Charges,—“ Landing rate” on goods i Consumption. 10 Cocoa Nut (desic- cated) Confectionery (American) Garlic Sago and Sago) flour Tapioea and Tapi- oca flour Albumen Honey (large casks) Vermicelli Semolina Capers Tomato Sauce Pistachio Kernals Succades Honey (in kegs and barrels) Meat extracts or essence Tomatoes (raw) Turtle (preserved, in tins) Anchovies . Arrowroot Honey jars, (in cans, or tins) Sauces (in casks| and in bulk) 61 * landing rate ” charge on goods imported at the Docks of the London and India Docks Joint Committ Nore,—The “ Landing Rate” is defined as including “landing or receiving by land, wharfage, weighing gross or gauging ( orted, (Compiled from the Tables of Rates and Charges issued by the Docks Committee.) required), and housing or piling on the quays or loading therefrom.” Table 21. SS? Fruit, Raw and Drica,| Tallow ee i Sugars, Spices. Chemntbalsy Eee Dyes and Barks, | Cables, Cordage, &e. cd eng Very light articles. All chien hai priate Vane n 12 bs 13 4 15 16 7 18) 19 20 21 l — i t Soe erm ce yi Soda ... saan + KG Nitrate of Soda ... ausivs ‘Cre TLiECOe) | 0 | Aron Potash, Sulphate of eaeer eve) sheen Sera eetone Barytes,Sulphate of) sence GYOASO sa veeeeeshes paver sos fares Sent Resta ihe “onan cites tereay Tallow (excépt] Vegetable, In casks) Settee ||MOM sth IN rer rice: Sumacheaevesscrcs Sern Fe Brimstone (unre- Turmeric fined) scent -| Divi-Divi.......2060+ Seteye be Ashes .. .--| Blacking (in easks)| Asbestos (crude or Brimstone (re-|, rock) Antimony (ernde fined) or oxide or sul- Glass (common phide) window) Barilla Mineral Water bottles (empty in packages) | Oil cake (loose) | Plumbago | Terra (Umbra) Foscos, | eepoc Glucose .......+++.. wvenee SEAN Gero HOps «.-scesessecees szeF) seeee Sugar and Molasses (except refined and beetroot, in loaves and sugar candy) u coecan Tallow (Vegetable) coach pevacs Valonia (in bags)... oor scAcne co Sausage Skins Bark, quercitron, mimosa, oak, tanners’, or long, | in packages | ‘ Almonds (in casks] = ssseee Sngar (refined or} Pepper ..c.ccceeeee| 0 seseee Valonia (loose) ...) =... Indian! Corn) _....... Argol (in bags) ...| Asbestos (mill- of 5 ewt. and best, in loaves) Madder (erushel) Blacking (in cases) board, rope, flour, over, serons or Seeds (ag*icultural) Chalk (French) or powder) bags) Bugles Dates (Persian, in Butter Nuts mats) Corossos Nuts (in bags) | Starch Terra (Sienna or Vrede) | concen Tallow (in tancs, wsases moro Me eee Sticks (above 400| Pumice Stone (in Dates (Persian, in| baskets) Almonds (in easks| under 5 ewts.) Dates (Persian, in bags or skin) Dates (Persian, in cases) Tamarinds Almonds (shell, in cases or bales) Prunes or French Plums (in bags) Prunes or French Plums (in chests| 1 ewt. or over) Dates (Egyptian or Tafilat, not ex- ceeding 84 Ibs., loose) Almonds (boxes or half boxes) Orange Peel Pomegranate Peel Gola Nut.s...