The person charging this material is re- sponsible for its return to the library from which it was withdrawn on or before the Latest Date stamped below. Theft, mutilation, and underlining of books are reasons for disciplinary action and may a result in dismissal from the University. 2 UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS LIBRARY AT URBANA-CHAMPAIGN L161— O-1096 SOME ACCOUNT OF THE FOUNDATION OF BISHOP COTTON SCHOOL, SIMLA, : AND OF ITS PROGRESS TO THE END OF THE YEAR 1869, Published under the Quthority of The Gobernors present at a Meeting beldut Simla December Ath, 1869. CALCUTTA: EO MAS 2 Sc sou eli @r Ly erin Een, I2 BENTINCK STREET. 1870. “4 " a fé Lah Pa AS yt S mf oe > +2 =7, - , * - ] . - ~ 4 ans i ; - rN ei vot a ; i oF & ee. P . 4 Pa Tal tu FN 7 ° ir * 4 me. ie a ; : a> Fee ' ‘ » wv * - y ive a ‘/ 7 oA Upwey LAS Bate - : i * 4 f Kr { ? ‘r fi eye 4 r 3; : BLA | é ¢ 72 #ty + 4 J J ’ ~~ d 1 ; b Phe) j "3 pats * . } “2 s ae x > ar ‘ - _ % & ? 7 % sa . 7 wee 4 uf? | os ne +t ‘ . Ife ae ee ee . ot 7. 7 _s me > we) ide @ ° » ad « - ‘ « x ' eM ~ P ¥ co +" 7 ‘fF ye J ‘ & TES ka (> Vegas aS oe re SPAT Nop. + yea: wae Se eee SOME ACCOUNT BISHOP COTTON SCHOOL, SIMLA, AND ITS PROGRESS TO THE END OF THE YEAR 1869. In a Statement drawn up by Bishop Cotton in 1860, the following account is given of the origin of this school :— ‘‘ Before the day of general Thanksgiving for the suppres- sion of the Mutinies, July 23rd, 1859, I issued a pastoral letter to the clergy of the diocese, proposing that a collec- tion should be made in all English congregations on that day, for the foundation of a Public School at some station in the Himalayas, as a thankoffering to Almighty God and permanent memorial of the great deliverance then com- memorated. Accordingly a general collection was made, amounting to a total of 35,000 rupees, including a munifi- cent donation of 10,000 rupees from His Excellency the Viceroy, who has kindly expressed to me his warm interest in the scheme, to the collection at the Cathedral, Calcutta. This money has been invested in 5} per cent. Government Securities, in the name of the Bishop and Archdeacon of Calcutta for the time being, and is called the Indian Public Schools’ Fund. At the same time a great number of letters were sent to me promising support and donations as soon as a definite scheme should be drawn up and placed before the ' public. As soon therefore as the site of the school is fixed, I hope to send out another appeal for subscriptions in India, ( 2 ) When J arrived at Simla after the incessant occupation of my visitation tour in the North-West and the Punjab, I at once turned my attention to the subject, and issued another Circular to the civil authorities of these provinces, requesting information as to the rate of payment for school- ing which could generally be expected from persons for whose benefit the scheme was intended ; and a number of papers were kindly circulated in the different stations by the Magistrates and Deputy Commissioners among the clerks and other residents, A few of these have put “down their names as able to afford sums which would nearly defray the cost of a boy’s board and education.* But the rates of payment generally mentioned are 15, 12, 10, or even 6 ritpees per mensem, and a large number have ‘declined entering their names at all, either from attaching little value to the systematic education of their children, or from inabi- dity to pledge themselves to the subject. From the facts and suggestions now collected, I think that the course of action which ought to be pursued, in hopes of gradually remedying the great and crying evil with which we have to deal, is tolerably plain. FIRST, we must endeavour to found one school at a central station in the Himalayas, probably either Simla or Mussoorie, with buildings and endowments, provided by private liberality, and assisted we may hope by a Govern- ‘ment grant-in-aid,t so as to_receive a certain number of children at a igw: rate of payment. The necessary school buildings must be erected entirely by donations, and the ‘institution, In accordance with my pastoral letter to the clergy, will be directly connected with the Thanksgiving Day, and dedicated to God’s service as a Thankoffering for His mercy, by the erection of a Chapel for the use of the scholars within the school precincts, in which the * * From such information asI can collect, I believe that the cost of a boy’s board and education in a scbool of 60 boys at Simla or Mussoorie would be from 30 Rs, to 35 Rs. per mensem. This would diminish as the numbers Increased.” - ¢ “No promise of this has been made, nor can it be asked till the plan ‘assumes @ more definite shape. ” (C circumstances of its foundation will be recorded.* The school should be placed under the direction of a small body; of Governors, partly official and partly elected. . Among the official Governors would be the Lieut.-Governor, the- Bishop and Archdeacon of Calcutta, and the Commissioner of the Division, Should the Punjab or North-West be: separated from the Diocese of Calcutta, the Archdeacon would yield his seat among the Governors to the Bishop of the new See, the Bishop of Calcutta retaining his as’ Metropolitan of India. As soon as possible a girls’ depart-’ | ment should be added to the Institution, as is the case in: the Lawrence Asylum at Sunawur, and the whole should: be placed under the care of a clergyman -of the Church ‘of _ England as Principal. The education of course should be as comprehensive as possible, with due reference to the wants and circumstances of the class for whose benefit the- School is especially designed, viz. the uncovenanted servants - of Government receiving small salaries, and others who: cannot send their children to Europe. _SHCONDLY, it will afterwards be desirable to found? day-schools of ahumbler kind for the children of Christian : residents in the great cities in the plains, for it is evident from some of the extracts above quoted, especially 11. and vill, that a hill school would not do all that is immediately required for the lowest and poorest class of Eurasians. ’ Local efforts are now making to establish such schools at two of the largest cities in the Punjab, and the wants of Lucknow would be amply supplied by the noble Martiniere, | if a girls’ department were added to the boys’ school there, But these schools could be maintained at a comparatively» small cost, and probably a diocesan education society would suffice for the purpose, to give stability and encouragement» to attempts made in the cities themselves. From these schools, by means of Scholarships, promising scholars could , be drafted to the central institution in the hills.” -*The following is the inscription:—This Chapel and School were erect- ° ed by public subscription with the assistance of Government at the instance” of the late Rt, Reverend G. E, L. Cotton, D. D, Bishop of Calcutta, asa (tae) The following selection from the suggestions referred to by the Bishop will be sufficient to shew on what grounds he had formed his plan :-— 1. From a Commissioner.—“ The class of people, who require most looking after, are writers who receive on an average from 100 to 150 rupees a month.” 2. From a Commissioner.—‘ At present, for want of some institution of the kind contemplated, many of the sons of our uncoyenanted officers are educated by Jesuits, not because the parents are hostile to our Church, but from absolute dearth of schools conducted on Church principles at a moderate cost. Your Lordship will probably find it necessary to have two schools, one aceessible to the resi- dents of the Cis and Trans Sutlej, and the other for the North-West Provinces; and in each school, it will per- haps be advisable to have a higher and lower department, but ata different rate of yearly payment.” 3. From a Deputy Commissioner.—“ Knowing that such a school is the crying want of India, as far as the clerks and that class of society are concerned, I warmly second the Bishop’s project myself, and hope that he may be able to establish a goad school in the hills, to the support of which I shall gladly contribute. ‘There are several clerks here with families. Their children are growing up. They can never hope to send them to England, and I do not know to what schools they can send them in India. They would be glad enough to send them ifa good cheap school were established ; but men of this class are unable to assist in carrying out such a project. As regards the rates of schooling, 10 rupees per mensem, should be the lowest, and 30 rupees per mensem the highest,” Thank-offering to Almighty God for His deliverance of the British people in India during the Mutiny of 1857. The foundation stone was laid Sep- tember 26th, 1866 in the Bishopric of the Rt. Rev. G. HE L, Cotton, D. D., and the building was completed December 3lst, 1869, in the Bishopric of the Right Rey. R. Milman, D. D, C ey 4, From a Judge.—“ Does the Bishop fully appreciate the slender means of the public on whose behalf he pro- poses the school? He must have an endowment, providing for a certain number of poor scholars annually; and I think that 10 per cent. of income is all that can be expected from a clerk for the education of one child, 15 per cent. for two, and 20 per cent. for three. The average income of people sending their children to such a school, as is required in India, would be under 200 rupees a month.” 5. From Major Fuller..— The object should be to found a school in the Himalayas for the children of European and Eurasian residents in India of the poorer classes. If for 10 rupees or 15 rupees a month a child could be boarded, clothed, and really well educated ata school in the hills where he would live in a healthy, instead of a debilitating climate, and would at all times associate with boys of his own class, instead of running wild amongst natives of the lowest order, where he would be brought up in a healthy moral atmosphere, and freed from the many pernicious influences, which would be acting on his mind elsewhere; T cannot imagine that there would be any lack of candidates for admission; ** * * *, by means of Government aid and private liberality I should hope that the cost to the parents of each child at such an institution might be reduced to sums varying from 10 rupees to 15 rupees a month, accord- ing to circumstances.” : The following extract from a letter from Sir Donald Macleod, though written about two years later, bears on the same subject and may be inserted here :— “Tgsee but little prospect at present of establishing a single institution for the reception of both high and low, and believe that the result must, for the present, at least, be this, that the higher classes will be provided for by your Lordship’s hill institution, the lower by humbler institutions in the Plains.” The letter then goes on to recommend 32 rupees a month as a suitable charge, (( G8") It will be seen from the passage quoted above from Bishop Cotton’s statement that he agreed with this latter view, and that he did not think it advisable to attempt to educate, in the same institution, boys whose parents could pay about 30 rupees or 35 rupees a month for their board and edu- cation alone, and boys whose parents could not pay more than 10 rupees a month for board, education, and clothing, The views of Lord Canning, on the Bishop’s plan, will be clear from the following extract from his Lordship’s Minute of October 29th, 1860 :— “The case seems to me to be exactly one in which a system such as has been proposed by the Metropolitan of India, may fitly be encouraged, and aided liberally by the Government.* It may be hoped that it will be supported by the British Public in India and in England ; but the principle of self- support should be carefully kept in view, to the fullest extent to which it may be attainable. The scheme proposed by the Bishop of Calcutta in the accompanying paper f is, so far it goes, a thoroughly sound and practicable one. I say, so far as it goes, because it does not profess to supply the wants of those Christian children who are not of the Church of England, and because even as regards children who are of that church, or whose parents are willing to accept for them the teaching of the Church of England, it will not, as I understand, put education within the reach of the poorer of them, until those whose families are more at ease shall have been provided with it. His Lordship contemplates the establishment in the Plains of schools of a humbler and cheaper class than those in the hills; but it is proposed that the former shall be ,.day-schools only, and that they shall be treated as a future and subsidiary step in the scheme. * In consequence of this recommendation, the Government undertake to give equivalent sums to all sums raised from the Public for buildings, and also to give-a grant-in-aid on the usual conditions. + The ‘‘ Statement” already referred to. i. Sy I am strongly of opinion that schools in the Plains should be provided as soon, at least, as schools in the hills. The expense of education at a hill school must, at the lowest, be beyond the means of a vast number of Eurasian families, settled at the Great Provincial Stations,” This plan, of providing for the middle and the lower classes in separate schools, was subsequently attempted to be set _ aside by the late Major Fuller, Director of Public Instruc- tion, who, it will be remembered, had from the first been of opinion that both classes could be provided for in the same institution. His proposal was that facilities should be given for the admission of all classes by the introduction of a sliding scale constructed on the principle of supplementing the deficient payments of the poorer classes by charging con- siderably more than remunerative terms to the richer. Bishop Cotton and the Governors agreed to this as an experiment, and in 1866” a prospectus was issued embodying a modification of Major Fuller’s proposal. The applications which came in for admission to the school in answer to this prospectus soon convinced the Governors that the plan would not work, and they accordingly addressed the Punjab Government in a letter from which the following points may be selected as the most important :— “These difficulties are of two kinds :—the frst is, that the wealthier parents, while not indisposed to give donations, or even subscriptions for a limited period, to enable the poorer classes to obtain a cheap education for their children, are, as a matter of fact, by no means willing to adopt this method * The mention of this proposal of Major Fuller’s somewhat anticipates the order of this account; but it was thought better to bring together into one view the various opinions and facts which go to shew, what, in Bishop Cotton’s judgement, should be the status of this school. (Sm) . of obtaining the object,—a method which amounts indeed to a continuous payment spread over a number of years ; the second is, that though the higher and lower terms may occasionally be so balanced as to produce the required average payment, this adjustment may obviously not be obtained for a long period together—a difficulty which now exists in filling up the various vacancies about to be made at the end of the year, the proportion of payments below the average being so much greater than those above it, that the school could not possibly be carried on. The Governors see no way of meeting these difficulties except by altering the terms. Persons of considerable incomes, to whom the new scale of terms has been sent, say that they will send their children to Darjeeling, or England, or other places. Nor is thesecond difficulty easier to deal with. It may be said indeed, that the Head Master should offer vacancies to those persons only whose united payments would produce the monthly sum necessary for the support of the institution; but, besides the fact that this course would entail very serious trouble and loss of time on the Head Master, it is clear that it could only be carried out when the applications were in excess of the vacancies (unless indeed we were willing to admit fewer boys than the school would contain) while this plan would actually exclude from the school in many cases, and notably so at the begin- ning of next year, the very boys whom it was primarily intended to benefit. It will be gathered from the above remarks, that the Governors do not advocate the plan of fixing the rates of payment according to the supposed incomes of the parents. And they submit that there is no injustice in allowing the rich to obtain a cheap education for their children, provided it can be done without excluding the poor, and provided also that the terms paid by them are bond fide, and in them- selves, remunerative, and not only remunerative with the help of a grant-in-aid. It should also be considered that it is not at all likely that parents with ample means will avail themselves of the ag eee ( % ) school to any great extent; rather it is likely that we shall have fewer applications for admission from such classes, as the facilities for sending boys to England increase. The Governors therefore feel that the question of terms “must be decided by the condition of the middle classes and the poor, and that no legislation is needed for the few ex- ceptional cases that may occur. They beg to submit then to His Honor, that the most practicable and the safest course is, on the one hand, to fix arate of payment which shall enable the school to be self- supporting, and at the same time not be beyond the means of the ordinary middle classes; and, on the other hand, to diminish the burden of these terms for the poorer appli- cants by endowments raised specially for this purpose. There would be no difficulty in making it known by public advertisement, and by a clause in the Prospectus, that the school had at its command the means of reducing the terms in special cases. There are now eight such exhibitions endowed, reducing the present monthly payment (28 Rs.) to 18 Rs. a month, a sum well within the reach of the majority of those who are at all likely to send their sons to school. The terms which the Governors now propose are 36 Rs, a month for 10 months, if the boy goes home for the two months’ holidays, and for the 12 months, if he stays the whole year. And they are fully prepared, if His Honor makes no objection to these terms, to make strenuous efforts to increase the present endowment for exhibitions for poor scholars ; and they submit that eight out of sixty, about twelve per cent., is no inconsiderable commencement.” His Honor the Lieut.-Governor approved of these views, and with reference to the classes for whom this school was intended, remarks “ that the Bishop’s scheme contemplated two classes of schools,—one in the hills for the children of those on the spot, or in circumstances such as to admit of their sending them there; the other for children of those (C10) in the plains, who are not in circumstances which would enable them to incur the necessary expense, or who are on other accounts unwilling to do so,—and His Honor has himself no doubt that the expression, ‘writers who receive on an average from 100 to 150 Rs. a month’ applies more properly to the latter category than to the former ; as the instances will always be quite exceptional in which a person, drawing not more than 150 Rs. a month, can think of sending his child toa school in the hills.” The letter adds, that ‘His Honor continues of opinion that to enable persons of humbler means to send their children to hill. schools, if so inclined, the more appropriate course is to. establish foundations of varying values to be assigned to! those who may be deemed suitable recipients as heretofore proposed by the Governors of the Institution.” In the course of the year 1869, Archdeacon Pratt issued , an Appeal for his ‘“‘ Hill Schools Nomination Endowment: Fund ”,—a scheme intended to assist parents of insufficient means to send their children to the hills for education,—. to do, indeed, on a large scale, and with reference to the: three Hill Schools, what the Governors of this school have begun to do with reference to this. A note. on this scheme | by the Archdeacon is of great importance in relation to the. present object, and is therefore inserted at length :— “Among the various communications I ‘have received : regarding this appeal, there are three from persons of in- fluence in which it is regarded as (what I may call) an alternative scheme, that is, as devised with reference to the question “ Hill Schools versus Plains Schools.” It is also. implied that it does not supply a means of educating a// who | C Skt )) meed education. ‘T feel it, therefore, desirable to write this Minute on the subject. 2. The scheme is devised with no reference whatever to the question “ Hill Schools versus Plains Schools;” in fact if I took either side in this question when it arose rather than the other, it was the Plains’ side. The recent move- ment for Church of England Schools commenced 13 years ago by the Reverend F. O. Mayne, Chaplain of Peshawur, sending me, to be laid before Bishop Wilson, a scheme for raising half a lakh of rupees to commence a series of schools at Lahore, Agra, and such central places in the Plains. This was in 1856. The mutiny of 1857 of course stopped the progress of the scheme. In January 1858 Bishop Wilson died. In November 1858, Bishop Cotton came out; and I handed all the documents over to his Lordship, who, having been a schoolmaster in England, was likely to do justice to the scheme. He issued a letter of enquiry. The result was that he announced in his Thanksgiving Sermon in the Cathedral in 1859 for the suppression of the mutiny, that the collection then made would be the commencement of a fund for opening a boys’ school inthe Himalayas; and the same was said in the printed prospectus which he issued. Many were well satisfied, but others would have preferred the original plan of schools in the Plains. The result of this appeal is the school now at Simla under the Reverend 8. Slater. For several years before Bishop Cotton came out, there were two other schools of the same class, one at Mussoorie and the other in Calcutta, subsequently moved up to Darjeeling. But the establishment of the Simla School was the first step in the more recent movement of Church of England Schools. ‘Having done thus much, Bishop Cotton turned his attention tothe Plains, and chiefly for their benefit established the Diocesan Boardof Education in 1863. Its main design is _to encourage local effort in stations sufficiently large for the opening of schools of their own, by giving advice, making occasionally grants of money, and so helping to draw out local resources, negotiating, if necessary, for masters and mistresses from England. Through the Board’s help a most excellent ( 12) High School for boys and a girls’ school have been opened at Allahabad. At Nagpore, andalso at Lahore, the Board has helped in the same way. At Delhiand Agra, East Indian and European children are freely taken into the Society for the Propagation of the Gospel’s College at the former, and the Church Missionary Society’s College at the latter. At Agra, the Lady Canning’s School for girls has been helped by the Board. At Lucknow there is La Martiniere for boys, and also now a branch for girls; so that a gocd deal has already been done for the education in the Plains of European and East Indian children, Soon after the Board was started. a girls’ school was got up at Mussoorie (Caine- ville) and was ultimately placed under the charge of the Board. Out of the effort to get up this school sprang the girls’ school at Simla, now under the governors of the Bishop Cotton School, Simla. There has been for several years a girls’ school at Landour, also in connexion with the Church of England, but belonging to a society in London. In the other five hill schools mentioned above, the Bishop and Archdeacon are officially connected with the managing bodies. In 1864 Bishop Cotton suggested and commenced his scheme for purchasing the boys’ school at Mussoorie, and placing it under the Diocesan Board of Education as a public school, and of endowing the three hill schools for boys. He died before this was completed. So fully aware was I that many people wished more to be done for the Plains, that in issuing an appeal to raise a fund to Bishop Cotton’s memory, feeling it necessary that it should help his un- completed scheme for the hills, [ nevertheless said that half should be devoted to the Plains, and there is accordingly now in the hands of the Board of Educationa “ Plains School, Bishop Cotton Memorial Endowment Fund.” 3. Much has thus already been done for providing the means of Church of England education. But much remains to be done,—jirsf, for those of small means who can pay moderately ; and secondly, for those who are very poor, and can pay next to nothing. It is for the first of these classes that I have devised the “ Hill Schools Nomination Endow- | ( iB 9 ment Fund,” which will meet the want by assisting to reduce the charge for education without injury to the present schools. This class should be helped as much as the very poorest. The present scheme is for the former, When a scheme is devised for the poorest, that also should be encouraged. But it can be no reason why the other should not be helped on and encouraged, that it does not provide for the education of all classes. The present scheme is a compact and definite one. The appeal is to last only two years, and then the fund will be ciosed and handed over to the Diocesan Board for administration. 4, And now I come to the point for which mainly the foregoing remarks are preparatory. Why is this present scheme connected with the hill schools? I answer thus:— lst.—The hill schools are in existence, and have been got up with great trouble and expense. They should there- fore be made available for education to the greatest extent possible. It is not now a question of Hill Schools versus Plains Schools. There these schools are, and they should be made as useful as possible. The schools have not been placed at those spots in the hills because there is any sufficient Chris- tian population there to require them, but on account of the climate, which undoubtedly is far preferable to that of the Plains, as so many testify by resorting to the hills in the season so enervating in the Plains. To do anything now to draw away attention from these schools, and to cripple their means, would be most unwise. They are not for Simla, Mussoorie, and Darjeeling, but for the Plains, and therefore to the Plains we must look for children. We must take things as they are. There are the schools, their buildings and apparatus ready, and they should be made as efficient in promoting education as possible. 2nd.—There are many who can afford to send their chil- dren to these schools, and they do so much to the benefit of the children. The terms are not too high. Were they lowered, the schools would lose stability. Itis very un- desirable to do anything to lower the standard of these schools. The object of my appeal is to make them available ( 14 ) to that class of persons who are at present only just unable to use them. 3rd.—Small schools in the Plains of only 12 or 20 boys or girls must give an inferior education, because of the impossi- bility of supporting from the funds efficient teachers. (Hven in our larger schools in the hills we have sometimes felt this. The late Mr. Maddock, who got up the Mussoorie School, felt it. He got out efficient men from Cambridge or elsewhere, who after a short time were drawn off by the higher pay which Government educational appointments offered, and Mr. Maddock was too generous to object to their going, although it was much to his inconvenience and loss, and he could not remedy it by raising his own standard of pay.) It is therefore only in the larger centres in the Plains, as Allahabad, Lahore, Agra, Delhi, Lucknow, where schools can at all pay. 4th.—But there are many scattered stations and out-stations, as I can testify, such as (1 name some at random)—Allyghur, Boolundshuhur, Hissar, Jhelum, where a school will not pay, but where there are clerks and others who are anxious to have their children educated. I have been applied to myself in several instances for help to send children to the hills. And, since they must leave home to obtain education, they may just as well (nay, far better) go toa hill school (the Hill schools being in existence) as toa Plains school not in their station. If children must be congregated together to make a school of sufficient size to pay, why should they not congregate in the hill schools, except in such cases as Allahabad where there may be enough in the place to form a school ? 5. Thus my appeal is founded on the state of things as they are at present. It is no appeal to found new schools; but to make the schools actually in the hills as useful as possible, and to assist that class of persons who are only just unable to meet the expense of educating their children to pepraan that boon. J. kl PRATT, Archdeacon of Culcutta.” _ The above extracts are perhaps sufficient to explain what, in the opinion of Bishop Cotton and those who were working with him, the nature of the school should be ; but as the subject is again referred to in a letter from the Bishop to the Public Works Department, which had requested him to communicate his wishes and intentions regarding the school, an extract from that letter is here inserted :— “The general object is to found a school for what may be called the middle class of European and Eurasian re- sidents in India. It is not designed for such boys as now goto Mr. Maddock’s at Mussoorie, still less to supersede or discourage the practice of sending boys for education to England. Hence it is a great object to have the charges as low as possible. I should be very sorry if the general charge for non-foundationers were fixed higher than 35 Rs. per nensem, and I should hope that this might be materially diminished for foundationers by means of endowments. _ “ Hence it would seem necessary, that the whole should be collected under one roof, not dispersed among Masters’ or Dames’ houses. It is obvious that this concentration is cheaper than the other plan: less food is wasted, fewer servants are required, many other expenses diminished. The first point therefore is to provide a two-storied building to hold 100 boys capable of extension to double that number with rooms in the building for Assistant Masters, to whom the details of discipline would be intrusted, and a detached house for the Head Master. “To this general plan I think that one exception might possibly be admitted. It might be desirable to allow the Head Master to receive into his house a limited number of private pupils on higher terms than the rest of the school. For it is very important to increase his emoluments as much as possible in order to secure the school against fre- quent changes, and prevent the Head Master from desir- ing a Chaplaincy or other Government appointment. Hence it may be desirable to provide him with a larger house than woald be requisite for his own family.” Si ol In 1864 Bishop Cotton published an address to the Clergy and Laity of the Diocese regarding his plans. It will be desirable to place on record one or two extracts from this address, which, while answering anticipated ob- jections to the scheme, reiterate the exact object contem- plated in the establishment of the school :— “JT have now laid before the Presidency the plan which, if it is liberally and widely supported, will complete the scheme for the foundation of public schools in the Himalayas for the benefit of the numerous and increasing class of residents in India who cannot send their sons for education to England. If these three schools* are founded, and day schools are also placed in the great cities, through local efforts aided by the Board of Education and grants from the State, I believe that we Englishmen shall have in some. degree done our duty in this respect to,the country which has been entrusted to us by the Providence of God, and which we are filling with our own countrymen and their descendants. J willnow notice some possible objections to the scheme, and so bring to a conclusion this somewhat lengthy paper. “Tt may be said that private enterprise ought to sup- ply our present wants to a great extent, and that the success of Mr. Maddock’s school proves it. But the suecess of Mr. Maddock’s school only shews how much good may be occasionally done by a zealous and able man without extraneous support, but his failure to find a successor, and the danger that his property will be purchased and applied to secular uses, proves the absolute necessity of placing such schools on a permanent foundation by public liberality. So too, in England, many a good private schoo] has flourished for atime during the lifetime of a first-rate master, but for the permanent education of the country we can only trust to those schools which have been founded in perpetuity through the piety of the middle ages, the zeal of the Refor- — * At Simla, Mussoorie, and Darjeeling. (chee) mation, or the intelligence and public spirit of the nine- teenth century. Above all it is only through permanent foundations that we can extend the benefits of a first-rate education to the promising sons of poor parents who cannot afford to pay terms remunerative to the schoolmaster. A private school is necessarily a class school; a public school involves that intercommunion of classes which is the glory and safeguard of England. “Some may think that the demands on public liberality are getting too numerous, and that they even increase while the cost of living in India is increasing also. I can only _ say that whatever be the cost of living, India contains a great number of rich people, and that, from the circumstances of the country, such appeals must be frequently made in order to supply the gradually developing wants of a newly settled population. Ever since I came to the diocese, frequent appeals have seemed to me absolutely necessary, and I see no prospect of their number diminishing. “Perhaps a more tangible objection is that the scheme is a very extensive one, and that a larger sum _ will be required to carry it out worthily than can reasonably be expected. No doubt liberal subscriptions will be necessary, but I look forward confidently to Government aid, and I have full trust in the real goodness of the cause. The Bishop of London has lately demanded from his diocese _ £100,000 a year to supply the spiritual wants of the capital of the British Empire, and it seems probable that he will obtain it. Indeed during his first year he reports that £75,000 have been paid, and as much more promised. I cannot think that the education of the European and Kurasian youth in India, the sons of the clerks, planters, railway officials and others who are now gathering in the country, if we consider all that it involves, their example and influence over the natives, their employment in various public offices and private enterprises, the usefulness of their lives, and the welfare of their souls, is really of much less importance than the direct preaching of the Gospel to the neglected myriads of London. At all events my demand ,. as is infinitely less than that of the Bishop of that see: if one- fifth of what he requires every year can be entrusted to me in the course of the next three years, this sum, if duly aided by Government, will enable me to establish for the benetit of the middle class of Anglo-Indians, three public schools, not less secure, and by God’s blessing not less use- ful, than Winchester, Rugby, and Marlborough, which may be cited as representatives of the three historical epochs to which we owe the public schools of England. “A more plausible form of the last objection may be this, that we are attempting too much at once, that it would be better to secure one school first, and then go on to the foundation of the two-others in succession. How- ever this may be, circumstances have forced on me the adoption of an opposite policy. The schools exist: they cannot afford to wait for the support of the public: if we do not act for them all immediately, the one which is omitted is in danger of being lost to us. Besides, L have sufficient confidence in local feeling to believe that we shall collect a much larger sum for all three schools together, than we should gather for any one school ; we appeal not only to the general zeal for education, but to self-interest and sym- pathy with particular places. There is hardly any corner in the diocese from which boys may not be sent either to Simla, Darjeeling, or Mussoorie. Were we to appeal for Simla only, a large part of the Presidency would feel so distant from it as to have but small interest in the foundation of a school there, and so too with the others. By asking at once for help for all three, 1 hope to enlist the goodwill of all the provinces into which the Presidency is divided.” In Bishop Cotton’s Report of the progress of his scheme, issued in 1866, he speaks thus of the subjects which he expect- ed would be studied in this school :—‘ Our desire is that the boys should be instructed in Christian knowledge, in Latin, English, one Indian Vernacular, a short course of Mathema- tics, History, Geography, and either Music or Drawing, with Gage) certain optional studies according to their various tastes and inclinations.” A very interesting article on this subject from the pen of Bishop Cotton will be found in the Calcutta Review, No. 83. The studies of the school are carried on in entire conformity with the views expressed in that article, with the exception that the study of English has a very much more important place assigned to it in our Curriculum than the Bishop, from want of acquaintance, no doubt, with the deficiencies of Indian boys in this respect, had contemplated. About the middle of 1861, the question of a site for the school was considered by a Committee of gentlemen resid- ing in Simla, and two Engineer officers. Five sites were examined,—Knollswood, the Downs, Observatory Hill, the Jail site, and Jutog, a station about four miles from Simla, which was at that time occupied by the Nusseeree Battalion. Of these Jutog was decided to be the most suitable. ‘Only one objection,” the Public Works’ Report says, “is urged to it, wiz. its distance from Simla for day-pupils. But itis apprehended that the school is not intended for the sons of the inhabitants of Simla,* and that the objection therefore is immaterial.” The military authorities were very reluctant to give up a station so conveniently situated, and which had been so uniformly healthy; but it was eventually agreed to place the station at the disposal of the School Committee, and all the Government buildings on the spot were subsequently made over to the school. * Not mainly. ( 20 ) There were four private houses at the station belong- ing to officers of the Regiment, three of which the Bishop purchased at the recommendation of the Local Committee for the sum of Rs. 17,000. These houses were a considerable distance from one another, and in no way suitable for a school, but it was thought advisable to waive these objections on account of the importance of commencing the school at once. These preliminaries having been settled, Bishop Cotton offered the Head Mastership to the Rey. Samuel Slater, formerly Senior Professor in Bishop’s College, Calcutta, and at that time Associate and Professor of Hindustani in King’s College, London. Mr. Slater accepted the appointment, and arrived at Simla in January, 1863. Two months later, the Second Master, Mr. John Short, educated at the Training College, Battersea, joined the school. Preparations were made for receiving boys into the Bunga- lows which had been purchased at Jutog, and a Prospectus was issued under the authority of Bishop Cotton in which the school was called the “‘Simua PuBLic ScHoo.,” and the terms were declared to be as follows :— Boarders over 10 years of age ... Rs. 35 a month. Boarders under 10 years of age hie! Gf) OW $ Twoor more of one family, irespective of age, each siewht reat pees ‘3 Day-Boarders over 10 years of age... ,, 22 s 74 under a P egy 48 Py Day-Scholars over 10 years of age ... ,, 10 7 4 under ‘3 ste brine’ 3 For the use of Books and Stationery... ,, 20 a year. It was also announced in the Prospectus that there were four exhibitions of the value of Rs. 12 a month each. ( 21) The school was declared to be under the Government of eight Governors, viz. :— The Hon’ble the Lieutenant-Governor of the Punjab, The Right Rev. the Lord Bishop of { Ex-ofii- Calcutta, The “Ven'ble the Archdeacon of Clo. Calcutta, The Commissioner of the Division. Major Lawrence, Deputy Commissioner, Rev. L. Poynder, m. a., Chaplain of Simla, Captain Pengree, ee era F, Peterson, ”Esq., The first boy joined the school on March 16, 1863. Next day three more came, and long before the end of the year the number had reached thirty-five, being as many as the limit- ed space would accommodate. As applications for admission continued to be received _ throughout the year 1863, additions were made to the build- ings, two large Dormitories and Masters’ rooms being added to one of the Bungalows. These additions enabled the school to take in 65 boys, which number was reached early in 1864, and retained till the removal of the school to Simla in September, 1868. In February, 1864, the Governors decided on changing the name of the school from Simla Public School to Bishop’s School. At the same time they issued a new Prospectus in which the terms were stated to be— For Boarders, 168 Rs. the half year, or Rs. 28 a month Day-Boarders, 132 _,, by ees 3 Day-Scholars, 60 ,, Se ld . These terms included pad ip uition, Medical Atten- dance, and the use of Books and Stationery. The general average terms were thus reduced from Rs. 380 a year to ( 22 ) Rs. 336 a year, as the Governors believed that the reduced terms would pay, and they were anxious to make the benefits. of the institution as extensive as possible. A Third Master, Mr. A. J. Rollo, was added to the staff in the middle of 1864. In the same year the Statutes of the School, having been previously submitted to the Local Governors, were finally passed and signed by Bishop Cotton. A copy is subjoined :— To «all to whom these Presents shall come,~—We, George Edward Lynch by Divine permission Bishop of Calcutta and Metropolitan of India, send greeting: whereas we have lately established a school for educating Christian children at Jutog near Simla, now and to be hereafter called and known as the Bishop’s School at Jutog near Simla: and whereas we have framed certain Statutes for the conduct and management of the said school; which said Statutes are contained in the Schedule A., hereunder written, and by No. 3 of the said Statutes it is provided that the Governors of the said school are four ex-officio and four elected, and it is desirable that we should execute a formal Deed under our corporate seal of office for the purpose of ordaining and establishing the said Statutes and of electing the said Governors of the said school, now therefore be it known that we do by these presents declare, that the Statutes here- under contained, marked A., either in their present shape, or as they or any of them may from time to time be altered in accordance with No. 19 of the said Statutes, shall hence- forth be the Statutes of our said school at Jutog ; and further we do hereby nominate and appoint Richard Charles Lawrence, c. B., Lieutenant-Colonel in Her Majesty’s Indian Army and a Deputy Commissioner and Superin- tendent of Hill States, Simla, the Reverend Leopold Poynder, Chaplain of Simla, George Pengree, a Lieutenant on the Invalid Establishment of Her Majesty’s Indian Army, now residing at Simla, and Frederick Peterson, Manager of the Simla Bank. also now residing at Sila, . ( 98 4 the first four elected Governors of our said school at Jutog, Given under our episcopal seal, and we have subscribed these Presents at Calcutta this Thirtieth day of March in the year of our Lord one thousand eight hundred and sixty-four, and of our consecration the eae G. E. L. CALCUTTA. SCHEDULE A. Statutes of the Bishop's School at Jutog near Simla, 1. The visitor of the school is the Viceroy and Governor- General of India. He interprets these Statutes in case of any dispute, and takes measures for their observance, and his decision on any point of interpretation is final. 2. The Trustees of the school property are the Bishop and Archdeacon of Calcutta. In their names the build- ings, land, and invested property are held, no payment can be made from such invested property, nor any land or build- ing alienated, without their consent. 3. The Governors of the school are four ex-officio and four elected. Vacancies among the elected Governors are filled up by the whole body. 4, The ex-officio Governors are the Lieutenant Gover- nor of the Punjab, the Bishop and Archdeacon of Calcutta, and the Commissioner of the Division in which the school is situated. 5. The elected Governors must be residents at Simla or in its immediate neigh!ourhood. When an elected Governor leaves Simla or its neighbourhood, his office becomes ipso facto vacant. The remaining Governors have the right of declaring the vacancy. They may also, if they deem it, expedient, declare his office vacant, if he has been absent from three Governors’ meetings in succession, or from four in any one year. 6. The Head Master of the Simla Public School is ex- officio Secretary to the Governors, and has ordinarily the right of being present at their meetings without a vote. The Governors may, however, hold meetings from which they may by a special vote exclude him. ( 24 ) 7. The control of expenditure of all money coming to the school, except from endowments, is vested in the Gover- nors. The ordinary disbursements are made by the Head Master, who submits full accounts to the Governors at their meetings. Any extraordinary disbursement is made by the Governors. Under “ ordinary disbursements,” are included salaries, wages, the purchase of stores, school- books, crockery, and furniture. 8. The money held by the Trustees is devoted primarily to the erection of buildings, and (if necessary) to the pur- chase of land, also to the formation of a permanent endow- ment for exhibitions and the Head Master’s salary. But on the application of the Governors, it may be devoted to other school purposes if urgent cause be shewn to the satisfaction of the Trustees. 9. The Head Master submits, for the approval of the Governors and of the Bishop, the general course of educa- tion to be pursued in the school, which he is then left freely to carry out. In case that any dispute should arise between a parent and the Head Master, it is referred to the Governors, whose decision is final. 10. The Head Master must be a communicant, and, ceteris paribus, a Clergyman is to be preferred to a Layman for the office. All the scholars are required to attend daily prayers, and to receive regular instruction in Holy Scripture. There is also imstruction at stated times in the Church Catechism and Prayer Book, but any boy may be excused from attending these lessons on a written application being made by his parents or guardians, | 11. The Head Master is appointed by the Bishop of Calcutta, but may be removed by a vote in which six of the eight Governors concur. He has the sole management of the internal affairs of the school, both in education and discipline, subject to the general control of the Governors. He has the right, with their concurrence, of dismissing any pupil for any grave moral offence, or for habitual idleness, or long-continued disobedience. : ( 25 ) 12, The Assistant Masters and all subordinate officers of the school are appointed by the Head Master, their number and salaries being fixed by the Governors. Any such Assistant Master or officer may be removed by a vote of the Governors present at any meeting. 13. If the Bishop of Calcutta fails within nine months after he is informed of a vacancy in the Headmastership - to send to the Governors under his hand and seal the name of the person appointed to the office, or if the person appointed does not arrive at Simla within one year after the Bishop has been so informed, the appointment for that time lapses to the Governors. If the see is vacant, the appointment is made (under the same conditions) by the Commissary of the Diocese. 14. Of the Exhibitions which may be foundedat the school, at least eight should be given away by the separate patron- age of the eight Governors in succession, the ex-officio Governors ranking first according to this order ; Lieutenant- Governor, Bishop, Archdeacon, Commissioner, and the rest according to the order in which they were elected. Each Go- vernor appoints an Exhibitioner by signing the following paper :— al; ,being a Governor of the Simla Public School, hereby appoint , son of , aged , to an Exhibition in the school, and I declare my belief that the circumstances of his parents (or guardians), are such that they cannot without difficulty pay the full charges for his education.” The tenure of an Exhibition ceases when a boy leaves the school. 15. After eight Exhibitions are established, the Gover- nors shall decide whether it is expedient to found others under the same conditions or as prizes to be given by examination. 16, Rules 14 and 15’only apply to Exhibitions paid out of the school money, whether arising from pupils’ fees or interest of investments. The Trustees shall have the right ( 26 ) of accepting any Exhibitions founded by private liberality, under any rules, or on any patronage, of which they approve. 17. The ordinary business of the school is conducted by such Governors as attend the ordinary meetings. But on certain grave questions the opinions of the non-resident Governors are sought by letter ; among the matters which must be thus submitted to all the Governors are, the elec- tion of anew Governor (the names of, at least, three persons proposed for the office being sent round by the Secretary), the dismissal of the Head Master (in which case the Governors appoint one of their own body to conduct the correspondence), or the proposal of a Bye-law. In case of an equality of votes when the opinion of all the Governors is sought, the Bishop of Calcutta has a second or casting vote. Ata meeting of Governors the chairman has a second or casting vote. 18. The Governors have the right of making any Bye- laws or Regulations not inconsistent with these Statutes. 19. Any of the above Statutes may be altered with the concurrence of the visitor, and six of the Governors, of whom the Bishop must be one. Each of the Governors signifies his assent or dissent in writing, and both the assents and dissents are circulated among the Governors before the decision to alter the Statute is finally submitted to the visitor for his approbation, so that those who have assented may reconsider their determination on seeing the arguments of those who have dissented. 20. Should it be determined hereafter to devote a por- tion of the school land and property to found a girls’ school, in connection with the Church of England, on principles similar to those of the present boys’ school, the Governors, with the concurrence of the Trustees, shall be at liberty to do so. G. KE. L. CALCUTTA. As applications for admission to the school were received during the year 1864 in great numbers, and there appeared. A no hope of accommodating all who were likely to come, the question of building at Jutog had to be considered, and it was then found that the subject was beset with difficul- ties. It seems to have been intended (though there is no documentary evidence of the fact) that the bungalows at Jutog should be pulled down, and the materials made use of when it should become necessary to build. The Gover- nors in office in 1864 thought this plan wasteful, and refused to consider it. They desired that the bungalows which had been bought should be utilised in some way, and they met the Head Master several times at Jutog to devise a plan of a building which should embrace, if possible, two out of the existing houses. It was however, soon discovered that no such plan was feasible. The ground between the two houses nearest to one another, besides being very precipi- tous, forms a deep re-entering angle ; and a house built in Such a position would certainly be damp. The only other building sites were, a piece of ground belonging to an estate in the cantonment, which had not been purchased by the Bishop, and which could only have been purchased at a ruinous cost ; the play ground, which could not be spared ; and a small parade ground, very unsuitable in many respects, and ata great distance from all the other houses in Jutog: while to build on any one of these sites would have involved the abandonment of, at least, two of the bungalows we had purchased. These difficulties led the Governors to consider whether, after all, the Jutog site was as suitable for a school as the original committee had imagined it to be. After much deliberation the Governors came to the ( 28 ) unanimous opinion “that Jutog is too far from medical assistance ; that the bungalows are unsuitable for any purpose required for a school; that it is highly objectionable that the play ground should be traversed by two public roads; and that, therefore, it ought, if possible, to be abandoned.” Bishop Cotton visited Jutog in September of the same year, and entirely concurred in the opinion of the Governors that it would be desirable to remove the school to Simla. Fortunately the Government were willing to resume the site for military purposes, and they also agreed to purchase the bungalows from the school at a valuation. The price eventually settled was Rupees 19,200; the total cost to the Governors having been, counting the additions and repairs which had been made, Rupees 22,500. As the bungalows were occupied by the school for four years after this agree- ment, the sum of Rupees 3,300—the difference between the total cost to the Governors and the proceeds of the sale— may be considered as representing the rent for those years. In order to find the best possible locality for the school in Simla, ten different sites* were examined, some with houses already built on them, and some without. It is unnecessary to enter into the details of the various meetings held to discuss the merits of these sites. The unanimous opinion of the Governors, as well as of His Excellency Sir John Lawrence, and of Bishop Cotton (both of whom visited the * These sites are known by the names of Knollswood, the Downs, the Encamping Ground, Merlin Hill, Observatory Hill, the Convent on Ely- sium, the Spur east of the J ail, the south of Prospect Hill, Mayday Hill, and Summer Hill, ( 29:7) more likely of these sites), was, that the Knollswood site was the best. After this decision had been come to, an unexpected difficulty arose: the Keonthal Rajah, to whom the ground belonged, would neither sell it, nor give it, nor take other land in exchange for it. The Governors offered him a sum much greater than the value of the land to him: the Punjab Government offered a khilut, and pro- mised honourable recognition of the favor, but for a year and a half no progress was made. At last about the. mid- dle of 1866 the Rajah agreed to take in exchange the vil- lage of Wakna, in the pergunnah Berowlee near Subathoo, the value of which was Rs. 492 per annum. This sum therefore represents the cost to Government of the present site of the school. The site is on the south end of the Knollswood spur, and contains 54 acres, 2 roods, 24°8 poles. The transfer of the village of Wakna to the Keonthal Rajah in exchange for the Knollswood site was sanctioned by the Secretary of State for India, in a letter dated March 1866. In the previous year, 1865, Mr. Crawford Campbell, Execu- tive Engineer of Delhi, had been sent to Simla by the Punjab Government, in anticipation of the consent of the Rajah to the agreement just mentioned, for the purpose of draw- ing a plan of the school. This plan, which was of hand- some and appropriate design, but without unnecessary ornament, was received by the Governors in April 1866. It was calculated for two hundred boys and a proportion- ate number of masters. The plan was sent to Calcutta to Bishop Cotton, and was approved by him as to its architecture ( 30 ) and general suitableness for school purposes ; but the Bishop expressed a fear that the proposed towers would add greatly to the expense of building. One of these towers, intended for a clock, was dispensed with ; the other, which was much smaller and would make no appreciable difference in the cost of the building, and which was indeed needed to hold the school bell, was retained. The plan was then sub- | mitted to a committee of Medical men, Dr. Beatson, Inspector General of Her Majesty’s Hospitals, Dr. Cunning- ham, Secretary of the Sanitary Commission, and Dr. Clark, Medical officer of the school, who kindly undertook the task of examining the proposed building as to ventila- tion, space, and other sanitary arrangements. Their unani- mous decision was that the plan required modification, the chief objection being that as the school-rooms and dormitories occupied four sides of two quadrangles, the building would be at once ill ventilated and damp. The change insisted upon by this Medical Committee, added to the nature of the ground, rendered it impossible for the Governors to provide accommodation for more than 150 boys, and they recommended this reduction in the number of scholars to Bishop Cotton. His Lordship expressed his approval, and the arrangements of the building as to all important points were definitively settled as they now exist. The plan ofa hospital and its position were both fixed at the same time by the above-mentioned committee, It had originally been intended by Government that the school should be built entirely under the superinten- dence of the Public Works Department; but that intention was abandoned, and the Governors had to make independent arrangements for its erection. As no one could be found in Simla willing to take a contract for the building, an agreement was made witha Builder by which he bound himself to work under the superintendence of the Governors, receiving a salary of Rupees 200 a month, anda bonus of Rupees 2,000 on the completion of the work, the Governors having the right of dissolving the agreement at any time if they were not satisfied with the work. In a rough estimate furnished by the Builder the probable cost of about half the building was stated to be Rs. 65,000. This estimate was revised, and the amount reduced to Rs. 59,230-13-6, but it was distinctly stated by the Builder that he could not pledge himself that the cost should not exceed that sum. This arrangement which took effect at the end of Febru- ary 1866 did not extend beyond the collection of materials and the commencement of the levelling. In July, an un- favorable report of the bricks and other materials was received by the Governors from an Engineer officer who kindly made an inspection at their request ; and as, in addi- tion to this, it had become evident that the actual cost would much exceed the estimate, it was determined to dissolve the _ agreement, Major Innes, Civil Engineer, then offered to take the contract. His estimates and specification of work were examined and approved by Colonel Campbell, Superintend- ing Engineer of the Division, who kindly undertook this duty, and on his report that the rates were very moderate, ( B25 the contract for half the building was given to Major Innes. On the 26th of September 1866, the Foundation Stone was laid by His Excellency Sir John Lawrence. His Excellency was met at 5 p.m. by the Governors of the school, the Head Master, and the Chaplain of Simla, where the new road joins the Mayday Hill Road, and was conducted to the spot where the stone was to be laid. A form of Prayer which had been drawn up by Bishop Cotton was then said, and the stone was laid in the usual manner, the coins of the realm being placed under it, and a copper plate bearing this inscription :— In the Name of THe FatHEerR, THE SoN, AND THE Ho Ly Guost, THE ONE ETERNAL Gop, The Foundation Stone of this School called BISHOP’S SCHOOL, SIMLA, Erected as a Memorial of the Mutiny of 1857, and asa Thank-offering for deliverance from the same, was laid on the Twenty-sixth day of September, 1866, BY His ExcELLENCY Sir JoHN LAWRENCE, Bart., G.C.B., K.8.1., Governor-General and Viceroy of India ; Tur Hon. Sir D. F. MACLEOD, K.C.S.L., being Lieut-Govr. of the Punjab ; Tue Rieut Rev. G. E. L Corron, d.p., Bishop of Calcutta ; ( 188) CoLONEL REYNELL TAYLOR, C.B, C.8.1, Commissioner of the Province ; THE Rey. T.C. Smyru, D.D., the Chaplain of Simla, AND THE Rey. 8. SLATER, Head Master of the School. BENEDICTUS BENEDICAT. In less than a fortnight after the laying of the Foundation Stone, Bishop Cotton met his death by drowning. Ata meeting held a few days after this mclancholy intelligence was received in Simla the Governors put on record the following minute :—‘‘ The Governors most deeply regret to hear of the serious loss which Mrs. Cotton and the Diocese of Calcutta and this school in particular have sustained in the death of the Bishop of Calcutta, and they hereby place on record their sense of the zeal and devotion to the cause of education in this country which prompted his Lordship to found this school, as well as of the ability, discretion and judgement with which he continued to direct its affairs up to the time of his lamented death.” After Bishop Cotton’s death the name of the school was changed at the recommendation of the Ven’ble Archdeacon Pratt; from Brsuop’s ScHoot to BisHop Corton SCHOOL. On the completion in September 1868 of the half of the building for which Major Innes had contracted, His Excel- lency the Viceroy directed Captain Pemberton, R.E, to report on what had been done. This report was called for (eae) because the Government had undertaken to give equiva- lents to all sums collected for the building. Captain Pemberton’s report is as follows :— “T yesterday made the necessary inspection, and have every reason to believe that the construction of the build- ing throughout is of a very permanent and substantial character. A report on the state of walls only lately finished and covered in, cannot, of course, be made in such positive terms as might be used with reference to walls which had been inspected during various stages of progress, but, as far as outward examination is a test, those of the finished portion of the building, which are of stone laid in good stiff clay and pointed with mortar, are well built, and they are free ~~ from cracks or bulging. The walls which are now in course of construction I also examined, and was quite satisfied with the nature of the stone and clay used in the work, and with the general style of construction. These afford confirmation of the opinion, that the walls of the finished parts of the structure are soundly and substantially built. The timbering of the roofs and floors was also inspected by me, and the whole appears to be fully equal to the work it has to perform. Some beams in the Dining Hall, which has a width of 24 feet, being cased, so that their size and character could not be seen, were opened out for me by Major Innes, under whose instructions the school is being built, and I found that the construction* adopted was a wooden beam trussed on either side with iron rods, the casing being put on as being more sightly than the girder of wood arid iron. The safety of these beams has been already proved, as it was in the room, the floor of which they support, that the water-color drawings were placed during the late Exhibi- tion of Fine Arts, and previously to this, Major Innes * This mode of construction had been approved by Colonel Campbell before it was sanctioned by the Governors. informs me that for his own satisfaction he made a large number of men jump up and down on the floor simulta- neously, this being a much severer test than the beams are ever likely to be exposed to again. Irrespective of these tests I am quite satisfied as to these beams. Finally, I may say that I do not suppose that there is another building in Simla which can be compared to this for solidity of construction.” In 1867 the Bishop of Calcutta visited the building, and in consequence of his Lordship’s hearty approval of what had been done and his wish that it shguld be pro- ceeded with, the Governors gave Major Innes the contract for the remainder of the school. Funds to meet the expense of the building of the first half were already in the Governors’ hands, but there was nothing for the second half. The Bishop, therefore, kindly issued the following appeal early in 1868 for the purpose of raising the necessary funds :— “Tt has been judged necessary by the Trustees of the Bishop Cotton School (now at Jutog) to remove it to Simla and to build new buildings, in which to provide accommodation for the number of pupils which the multitude of applications for admission shews to be requisite. The new building is worthy of its new site at Simla and of its designation. But in order to carry out the design, and to receive the probable number of scholars, about Rupees ~ 80,000 are required. It would bea serious misfortune if it should remain unfinished. The whole design had received the invaluable approval of Bishop Cotton, and its first stone was laid by the Viceroy on September 26th, 1866. About half the building will be ready for the reception of 97 scholars by the middle of 1868, and it is intended to occupy that portion of the building as soon as it is ready, but the work will be in every way maimed if it is left incomplete, (3619 On this ground I venture to base an appeal for the assis- tance of all who are interested in the work of education which has been so much advanced by the ‘Schools for the Hills and Plains” among our fellow-countrymen in India. Whatever sum is raised will meet an equivalent from Government. R. CALCUTTA.” This appeal was supplemented shortly after by the follow- ing Statement, which was drawn up at Simla by the gentle- men whose names are subscribed, after a full enquiry into the object of the school :— STATEMENT TO ACCOMPANY THE BISHOP OF CALCUTTA’S APPEAL FOR BISHOP COTTON SCHOOL. Havine been requested by the Governors of Bishop Cotton School, Simla, to assist in the collection of funds for the completion of the building, we have made full enquiries into the object of the institution, its present financial condi- tion, and the outlay necessary for accomplishing the wishes of the founder, and have satisfied ourselves that the object is worthy of public support, and that the means suggested for completing the scheme are feasible. 1.—The objeet of the school is to give a sound education, with careful religious training, to those children of the mid- dle classes in this country whose parents are unable to send them to England. The improvement now demanded in the personnel of the various departments of Government, and the increasing value attached to competitive examina- tions, seem to render it absolutely necessary that some advance should be made in the educational machinery, Bishop Cotton School seems well adapted to make this improvement, and as its constitution promises to give permanence to this effort, we believe that all classes of the community are interested in placing it on a firm foundation, ——— a (2 aie) 2.—This work cannot be done in any reasonable time, without assistance from the public. Lord Canning was so strongly convinced of this that he gave Rupees 10,000 at the commencement of the undertaking, and in his minute of 1860 obtained Government support for it. Bishop Cotton -exerted himself vigorously in soliciting public aid, and the opinion of the present Bishop of Calcutta on the subject is sufficiently declared in the appeal which accompanies this statement. 3.—Half the building to accommodate nearly a hundred boys, with the Head’ Master’s house, Serjeant’s Lodge, and Hospital, is now finished at a total expense of Rupees 125,000. Thesum required to complete the building, includ- ing a chapel with sittings for 150 boys and 25 of the public, is Rupees 82,000. Of this sum Rupees 20,000 are now in hand, leaving a balance of Rupees 62,000 to be obtained. The Governors are prepared to borrow Rupees 40,000, which they hope to pay offin about ten years. The remaining Rupees 22,000, or rather the half, Rupees 11,000,—as by Lord Canning’s Minute, the Government will give an equivalent to all sums raised for this purpose,—is the sum which it is confidently hoped,will now be contribut- ed by the public, whose aid we hereby earnestly solicit. (Signed) KR. TEMPLE. i D. C. Macnass. * P. S. Lumspen, Lt.-Col, ¥ H. W. Norman, Col. fe A. M. Monteatu. ve G. B. Matteson, Lt -Col, 5 A. Huysue, Major-Genl. és J. Baty, Chaplain. Before the building was completed a very considerable alteration was made at the suggestion of Major Innes, by which some part of the right wing was dispensed with, and room was made fora chapel adjoining the buildings,—the original intention having been to erect a chapel at some little distance but connected with the school by a covered ( 38 ) way. By this means a great saving was effected in the way of buttresses and other supports; and, indeed, unless this arrangement had been made we should not have been able to build a chapel for many years. The total cost of the whole Building, now completed, may be stated under the following heads :— Class rooms, Dormitories, Dining Hall, &c., for 150 boy Binet ale »- 1,21,286 10 0 Quarters for ie resident Masters bien sey 15,000 0 2 Head Master’s House, to include Boarders ... 19,733 5 0O Chapel to hold 150 boys and about 380 of the public .. + vs pea. pe ob Dhg hd tr A) ee Quarters for Sergeant and Matron soe AoA 4,885 2 0 Hospital for 16 boys, with separate ward vi 4,865 0 0 Servants’ tobi cook-room, ae Laun- dry, & age 9,742) 1d Road to the School somewhat ‘over 4 da mile, and 2 bridges : ay 2.15610 8 Levelling for the School and Playground eve ~ 15,939 1270 ———- -—— Total Rg, \... 2,be. bol oon The following sums have been received to meet this expenditure :— Proceeds of First Appeal in 1859 es ». 935,000 0 0 Do. fp 1869. MO > -. Oe Proceeds of Second age in 1864 ee to eee Ist, 1866 3: 7,068 4 2 Total Rs. cae 57,068 4 2 Government equivalent to above ey Tt hc ee PAL Subscriptions in 1866, with Government equiva- lent"... ae es vd 1,100 0 0 Sale of houses at J utog his ae 19,200 0 O Church Building Fund, Donation i 3,200 0 0 Subscriptions to October 1869, with Government equivalent ... on 20,319 4 0. Special advance from Government November 1869 ... oe ove oe vce tiitea® 4°20,000 7 OCD Total Rs.... 1,67,955 12 4 (4:39 >) The above account does not include the interest on sums which have been borrowed to complete the work. The total debt now on the Building, including the special advance of 10,000 Rupees from Government, is about 55,000 Rupees. The Local Governors at Simla have made themselves res- ponsible for this amount and are now paying 10 per cent, interest upon it. The Governors believe that they are justified in hoping after this statement of the character and object of the School, that the Government and the public will not allow a debt of this magnitude to remain long onan Institution founded and planned by Bishop Cotton, and since administered by the Authorities of the School in as complete accordance as possi- ble with the enlightened views of its Founder. As to the Endowment of the School, the Governors are thankful to be able to report that, chiefly through the exer. tions of Archdeacon Pratt after Bishop Cotton’s death, a Fund was raised partly in England, and partly in this country by which the greater part of the Head Master’s salary is now provided for. The following is extracted from the Arch- ‘deacon’s final Report on this part of the scheme :— ‘6 Subscribed direct to the Simla School Endow- ment Fund see 13,594 13811 _-One-third of subscriptions to the three Schools in common a a sa Gs LOO et oe 52,353 0 4 . Government equivalent oe .- 52353 0 4 Total: Rann. -.4,904,706- 0; § This total, together with the interest which has accumu- lated, less by printing and other expenses, has been invested OSU 2) in a note of 54 per cent. Government Securities for Rupees 98,300 in the name of the Bishop and Archdeacon of Cal- cutta. The note is deposited in the Bank of Bengal in the Bisnop Cotton ScHoot Sim~A Memoriat EnpowmMent Funp Account, and the interest is transmitted by the Bank to the Secretary to the Governors of the School at Simla, and is employed in paying the salary of the Head Master.” There are at present fifteen Exhibitions in the School, in the gift of the Governors, reducing the annual payment from 360 to 240 Rupees. These are maintained out of the Govern- ment grant-in-aid. As the number of boys increases, it is hoped that more Exhibitions will be added for the purpose both of placing a good education within the reach of the poorer classes, and also of stimulating industry and the desire of higher scholarship than has yet been common in schools of this character in India. Prizes of books and Mathematical instruments of no great value beyond the distinction they convey are given annually at Michaelmas. Bishop Cotton gave a special prize for Scripture knowledge during his life time, In 1869, His Ex- ellency Sir W, Mansfield, Commander-in-Chief, gave a prize of 100 Rupees to “the boy who, on leaving the school, unites the two qualities of perseverance in study, and exemplary good conduct.” At the Annual Distribution of Prizes in1869, the Bishop of Caleutta presided and was so kind as to pro- mise two prizes for the following year,—one for Scripture, - the other for general proficiency in a boy who has not obtained a prize. On the same occasion the Bishop unveiled a full length portrait in oils of Bishop Cotton, with which the Din- ing Hall of the School is embellished. This portrait was ( S41 )) C “ painted at the end of 1868 by Mr.. Eddis, partly from a por: “trait painted by the same artist about 16 or 17 years ago, and "partly from. a Photograph of .the Bishop taken shortly ( before his death. The total cost was 720 Rupees, which sum ‘has been given by the. boys and their siete and by.a few _ friends interested in the school. The first Visitor of the school was His Excellency Sir John “Lawrence. The present” Visitor is His Heel eney the Earl of Mayo. » The following Gentlemen have. served on ‘the Committee as elected Governors : — . Col. Lawrence, Rev. J. Baly, Capt. Pengree, ' .D, C. Macnabb, Esq., Rey. L. Poynder, ‘Col. Faddy, F. Peterson, Esq., ‘Major. Innes, Rev. Dr. Smyth, ; Rey, C.andJ. Waterhouse. J. W. Macnabb, Esq., The following is a List of Subscribers to the Simla’ School Endowment. Fund, ous from Arehdeacon Pratt’s Final Report :—* ~W. H. Abbott, Esq. bss i igaeae 50.50 0 Colonel Becher ae +: Ps eet he AY to) ‘Rey. E. C. Boyle = He ma 50 0 0 Tke Hon. G. Campbell ... ety ket wwe. £00; On M Bishop Cotton “pe sof isp 0 00D OO Major Crofton”... eos ene Spiel Maal ee Y 'Major Currie... ee os ie 50 0 0 eDr. Dallas -***... i eee a US ABO te Oe nO Colonel Dickens oe e 50 0 O Diocesan Board of Education tee} pei Ht gpa iad Sir Herbert Edwardes... oe Saeko glt ates Heata D _C. P, Elliot, Esq. SA > eee ae a PUD. a0 Bement gy ee ee eee ( * This list contains the names of those only who subscribed specially to ‘this Fund. The Fund, in addition:to these subscriptions, received one-third ! of ‘the contribution made to the turee schogls in common, — ( 42°) G. R. Elsmie, Esq. —_..... eA The Hon. W. Grey ae a J. Hopkins, Esq. aus eae Major G. Hutchinson x, % W. Kirke, Esq. aie A Colonel Lake ... Se H. E. Sir J. Lawrence Colonel Lawrence * J. A. Loch, Esq. vita J. W. Macnabb, Esq. awe Sir D. Macleod ae Captain Pemberton Captain Pengree A. Pigou, Esq. L. C. Probyn, Esq. The Hon. W. Seton-Karr.. Society for Promoting Christian Knowledge Sums under 10 Rs. Colonel A. Taylor T. H. Thornton, Esq. Captain Williams Bishop’s School Simla Fund Collection in St. Peter’s, Calcutta oi Derajat , ‘, Marlborough College ¥ Christ Church, Mooltan .. RS Christ Church, Simla Faculty Fees 200 150 50 - 1,045 300 5 424 100 1,672 300 oooooo°o°o Samacnancoocecdcooaroocoeooeo eoooooo°o:°8 eo SoosoccocesceOCsooeocosoo List of Subscribers to the Appeal for the completion of the Building, issued in 1868 by the Lord Bishop of Calcutta, and now before the public— H. E. Sir John Lawrence ... The Lord Bishop of Calcutta From the same, Mural Tablet Fee Collected by Rev. C. W. Cahusac Colonel Norman <= Major Chalmers, through Major Innes Collected by Rey. A. W. Inwin Sir Donald Macleod ae D. C. Macnabb, ce A Collected by Rev. J. C. Thompson colonel Dickens oo ee 500 500 50 100 300 100 100 500 600 56 50 owocooceoooceco ocooooscoooSoS (248) J. Geogehan, Esq. His Highness the Maharajah of Burdwan Capt. Fortescue Colonel Bacon . ate Colonel Bunbury Res SE. G. C. het W. C. Capper, “Esq. The Hon. Capt Fraser _... Collected by Rev. W. W. Nicholls - by Rey. F. D. A. Willis H. Muspratt, Esq. Sue Dr. Wilson :.... J. Alexander, Esq. Colonel McNeile C. F. Hall, Esq. mr. Perkins _.... Captain Lichfield Lieut. Madden... Lieut. Woodcock Captain Holroyd Dr. DeRenzy ... A. Fenner, Esq. Rev. W. W. Phelps Colonel Hutchinson Colonel Maclagan Collected by Rev. E. J. Hubbard J. Hopkins, Esq. eee F. Newman, Esq. Dr. J. J. Clarke The Rajah of Belaspore W. J. Thorpe, Esq. K. R. Ww ..H. Hoff, Esq. ae Thomson, Esq. W. Langdale, Esq. Captain Pemberton Collected by Rev. F. F. Mazuchelli H. E. Sir William Mansfield Dr, Newton : J. Warburton, Esq. Captain Parsons Collected by Rev. W. Ayerst The Honorary Secretary of the Fine Arts Exhibition ‘Rey. E. B. Slater 50 20 1 50 50 100 207 20 10 50 100 50 20 10 5 20 50 25 200 16 10 16 22 100 10 COO O91 S919 SS OS SSS Ol OOS OS SOO OO OSS OO SS OO CS CO COO COCO SSS) OSI SS) SSNS SS SSO SS SYS) HY Sree SKeKers(]) SiS ( 44°) E. W. Parker; Esq. Balance of former Buildiie Fund Account Major Innes - Colonel Lumsden . Ses yp 1+ ds S. B. Thorpe, Esq. oe vi C. J. Shelverton, Esq. -... J.A.S. Ellis, Esq. ies J. Wells, Esq... a J.A.S. Gray; Esq. Collected by Rev. W. C. Bell Dry Doka& >"... TP Rev. J. Baly «*:. i Collected by Rev. M. E. Mills “wa +4 by Rev. J. Greenfield -... General Reynell Taylor — ... se Rey, A. O. Hardy Hes Colonel Trench Collected by Rev. W. H. Tribe C. Burton, Esq. Collected in England has Mrs. Macnabb, through D. C. Macnabb, Esq. .. Colonel Cripps... vie E. M. Gardner, » Esq F. M. Colonel Eliot... Captain Collett General Huyshe General Turner “i Sir Richard Temple W. Godman, Esq., through ‘Mr. Macnabb Colonel Faddy... sre Colonel Harvey W. Jardine, Esq. a e G. W. Allen,: Esq. A846 bee Colonel Broome ae A. P. Howell, Esq. The Hon. B.-H. Ellis Colonel the Hon. F. eat Colonel Malleson Major Beynon... General Kinleside A Fried >**s,, $s tee A Ramsay, Esq. at) «ss Colonel Rigaud eee tee a jor) CO ht noo peel Co) coooecomecao ooCcoolSs6 & oo cosoosoe -_ — ~ — eoeocososceooso Be SS ot 59 SS SS SI SOO ESOS S SS ODT S O.S OO © Sous cee ( 45 ) Miss Nicholson eee tse 10 Collected by Rev. C. J. Waterhouse ... 4-0 U2 Special advance from Government ... «>. 10,000 The Rajah of Nahun . 46 seu a, 200 A. B. Sampson, Esq. ee 50 Proceeds of Appeal for Postage Stamps i in Simla... 100 ooooeso ooooce so (36), ') ‘puvlsuq uy *puv[sug uy *puvisuq uy *puv[suq uy -quawredacq SM0}SNY oY} UT ‘aotfog Jo ydng “4s1qq “yssy ‘TMOUY 0101 “ox ‘yuowAojduie yuoserg €98T COST 6981 COST ¢98T LOST COST C981 c9st ‘9g ysnsny 00 1940490 “eS _10q0990 ‘eZ 1040390 @ervessee ‘7 1940900 ‘2 1240390 ' Ayue *[BAOTUOYT Jo 930 gost Gs Tady e9st ‘Z Tady e9st ‘T Tudy e981 ‘T Tady e981 ‘T Indy C98T “65 Your] S98I ‘6G ory G98 “8S WILT GOST ‘LT = qoreyy G98T “LT your S981 “LT 9 qoaeyy S98T “Ol youryy *mOISSIULpY Jo Jeg 01, ByWIg MOUWOWT 071 UvyLOOTT 0791 Uvq[OOTT vou YR][VMoo[Ny OTT MAOSSN 0391 o7n1 qsvqeley slag ‘oourd yey Wor J00YIS OY} OJU2 payupy wuaeg aany oym shog fo 4sv’T eee UPIATA “YT ZL Aasteyy “I IT e100yT °O Of TOpuUrT[eD “f 6 TOPULT[VD ‘DO 8 wr “a 2 WM "H 9 JOATIO “V G SMOTIIVTL 'O F SMOUNVN “WL € SMOTNVN "MS r0[ AUN “TT “UNVN (y ee) een Cee eRe eID ne Oe nO EEN, Se Oe ee 99st ‘Te ysnsny | gost “I ysnsny |“ ota |o osprnted VL 62 Q98I ‘Ig ysnSny | gost ‘L ysneny | ** og | = wapherg “M 8% E98I “eI 20 | E98l % oun |“ Ont Sr, edyiqd “V 1Z 9st “GI t0q0990 | gost “st = APN |“ geil dae at ediouL “A 9 ‘puejgug ur) cog ‘Te = ee | gost “et || Ae] ota [ot — waNgGYI0N “A GS ggg. - Aavnuve e9gt ‘9 Avy | BUG | Avy“) 1G ‘puelsug up| 9st ‘I Ame | e9st key | °" onta | Treader “A 8% -puejsug ut] gost “tS Ame | gost ‘® = Ae | trea Pes] — TeadmeD *O Go ‘UOTJCUIMIVXY souvsjUy posseg ge sia COQL F Avy | °° oyytee | °° uvsoy *f 14 e98T ‘I ysnsny| S9sT ‘T key}. ot po" uvssng "0 0 C981 ‘ydeg| sgt ‘ot = THdv | *"" OM: ise OLIMv'T “HL 6T ‘sorog “apdng -ystq quvjsissy | cogt ‘or “3dog| gost ‘2 dy | ot | Aouppog “A St ‘Autry uerpuys,Aysofeyy toy ut | eggt ‘ot «= adog | e9gt “L = THdy | eratg |“ —- Aoupton WL AT GOST "00 | S98T ‘E qady |" omtd | qophuy, “S OT COST "001 | S98T “E tudy |" oid | rophey, “OD ST | 9981 ‘oa, | 98T ‘E Tady | oid |" qophuy, “f FT OS lia eo a ‘puvlsuq Ul} FO8T 00, | S981 ‘SZ qudy | °° errequig) | *** svmouL ‘0 SI “TOT]VUTUTR “XQ oouvguy vyynojeg possvg | gogt ‘oe ‘AON | FORT ‘OT POST “TE 4090990 | FOBT ‘TT FIST “TS 1090990 | FOST ‘TT ‘quomyivdag sulojsng oy} ur] Gost “6 30g] FORT “2 ‘puvysug uy | 9981 “LS 41940990 | FOST ‘T *aFaT[oN 90x “100 JV MON “UOtyBUuTMEX aoUBIZUY vjINIVQ oy} posseg | SOQT ‘OG ‘AON | FORT ‘T 698T ‘oe ‘349g | gost ‘TI “QT "Qa, "Q°T ‘9A "Qa QO "AON 698T ‘tt ABW! e9gt ‘ZL 41090309 sates i 981 “E — 1040300 Coe reeces e98T ‘G "ydag ‘yuomredeg Aoamg yO | Lost ‘Te ‘20d | gost ‘Or ysnsny "99HO 8149H {pV UI AII[O | 9O8T ‘Te 41040300 | E98 ‘g ysnsny ‘UMOUY a10T A *[BAOULOY ‘MOTSsSIMpY “om “ueuAojdua yuosarg jo ayeq jo aq ER ARERR 34 ACN EE Hr OT NE TET NCE CR I A TO RE Ee BEBE II RINE EN ELE EE RR CY CE LL RE SLCC CS PL IT ICE LES TEL TIE ERATE v13y 0331, vIyN IT qn490 JY o10duyaag Burts oT] MOSSN yy qenjoda Bag vUuvIpooT Tsuvyy bd bots ‘aovyd JeyA\ TOIT oor UMOLT "M IP JoupIVy *O OF AIUpAVH : £ 68 oTepsury "MM ge UBMOY A F lg uoqsTm ‘f 98 AayIVT “) Gg lowed “f FE uoys[a “H €¢ UvseurT.C ‘H Ze SuIpleLy “M TE AOSTIM “H 08 “ANVN rei 9981 ‘Ie ‘20 | FOST ‘T TNdy | s1odunve | *** aa oIZUOy WV Lg queued ydeiSaya yur y1919 | 99ST .*0e “AON | FOSE TT Yoavpy | -™ oma | q310A “Ht 99 SUMUXY souvlyuy {VQ posseg aEcene POST “IL yoreyy | os oq | kaivy 69° quowpIvde gy oMOFT UT ALTO | gost ‘tex0qG9990 | POST “IL Yoreyy | ** peqeqeity |“ Aare * A #9 gost ‘te ea | sogt “6 uae | oma | “rado09 “9 9 gost ‘te «oe | FogT “G@ = ey | * ooyjeqng | ** xodoog "st Zo e ade vost ‘¢ yoxeyy | * oid |“ ouoy “T 19 ei gost “Ie *0C| Fost ‘¢ = wore | + exoyery | ** owes “0 09 = . rigs eae POST.€ = woreyy | orjmosenyy | ** Bunok “t 6h bm gost ‘t= Avie | poet ‘@ | woreyy | © epuarg | qdneyy “a gh “rauysnpuryy : a , Ut piepuLys IOYSrYy 04} posseg | LOST “TE 10q0}90 | FOST “Tore | orTMossnyy | *** OIA 'O LP gost ‘te soa | Fost ‘ez = ‘aet| oi |e woydurep (AA OF gost ‘te oq | goer 6s = ‘ae | qmmspmng | uojdureHT *D oF sropunyqny ) : , pata oe ‘20HO SAoucTssTMMOD UT yL919 | C9BT ‘es 1099990 | FOS 6G “GT | "8 qopunyyne | *** WOXIN 'V $F Tae 7) a) a OMG {| OBIE“ EF, gost ‘og ‘Aon | 4ogt ‘or. “aor | og | uoUIN “HL BF gost “Zt Avw| fost ‘et = Avy |: VISY | pooMUOTT *] OL | “piv post “eg =s_«- Avy |" ByynoyBg |,°°° ‘ATINOg "9 69 99st ‘Ig ‘9M | F98T Avy | *** ol[Mossnyy | *** rodivy “IT, 89 a on Fost ‘gt = Tady | ** meal eur 9 Zo cost ‘or = “vot | Fost ‘2 tad | exoyey | *** = oumorg “g 99 69st “so = Ae) gost “g = tdy |" s oopurtg yemvy | ** epreqg “0 99 *INS}LIUI/) | Ss - SY ooupg qryttz “tse PNUL| gost ‘oe “Aon | Fost ‘g trdy] ansjrauy) | *** POOM “$9 a4 Ang post “gs THdy| ** omg | T8WT VY £9 % 9981 “Ig ysnsny | FO8L qudy | ** emg |** —wopavay “A 29 2 soot “In dv] poste dy | oma | = eso “W Tg gost “It tady) sogr = addy | *** qniseyy | ** O80 *M 09 cost ‘0g = “AON| BOSE T= THdV | ouyony | ** your “4q 6g ‘uoreUTMUXY souLIyUGT posseg | == eres F98I ‘LT 9 tady | qnasoyy |? SUTyAUET “Y9 “o9 “uomAdojdue yuosor gy jo oeq jo oyeq oould ywqA Wor] | “TAWVN en )) ( 5t einem smeared eT *Koa “Ing *y, 'O ‘tofoAIng yuLysissy Fcc p7 é “KOA *purlsuyy Ul 8981 8981 998T S98I C98T ¢98t 9981 PIST 998T vO8L LOST } LOST ‘og -*ydog “0g “AON “0g “AON 000000068 ‘Tg 10q07009 0g = *AON “Tg 1040490 ‘Te *09(T ‘Tg 10q0990 ‘et. 299 ‘0g, “dog ‘og. = Ane ‘Ig ‘20 Ig 1040300 Avy Av Pov PIV PL "qT "9.0 “qT “qa “qo “q°.T oune eune oune Av Avy Avy eIWIg “uLTy UNpel Purg 008 666 066 ood ood poe BISV eyyequa yy VISY O1OYV'T oy oI 99y100IT INns}awu qoLIN ByNITBO on BlUATS o19dyon104) Byyno[Vg oeo o0@ 008 666 Aled *d 98 SMOUHNEN “OD 68 oLOOT, 3) tS WITINY "VY $8 ovr ‘D 78 sulssIH VL 18 uoskig ‘Vy 0g uoskig ‘y 62 uoskig *O yA TOHTUM “DLL Tod *D 9L MOSUIyIY “OD oL AMPLY “A FL AoTUIMG “T eh WOx0N "Q ZL pooToWt “9 14 52 )) f ‘\ ( 99st ‘Te "90 99st ‘Ig - 00 gost ‘Ig 99 9981 ‘Ig ysnsny ‘ 9981 ‘Te -ynsny gost ‘0 = *40N *9ayIOOY ‘aZoT]oH WosvMOTT, to aad ‘yuawj}Audap puooes OY} UI MON] GOST *8Z 1040300 Lost 8 “49 Deevovee gost ‘1g 10940990 *puesug uz | o9st ‘Tg “00d ‘puvsug af | 99st ‘1g 1090100 ‘UMOUY O1OTLAL * [VACUO “ox “uomoldme yuosolg Jo ojuq qudy 998T ‘Lb 9981 “21 qorvyy 9981 OL qorvyy 998T “OT yore yy 998T ‘OT yore yy 998T ‘¢ your 9981 ‘LT = “49. 9981 OI = 49a 99st ‘OL “48a QOS ‘Ol “Az 998I “CT = “G0 cost ‘og “dag cost ‘6s = Aug “udTssTMpy ~ Joop “é#e soe set $36 jopunyqne mMyANG o10ye'y OUT rwyssng BUS AOUTL . Te, e0usN oI reyssng TULL pea ooreg, INALYSOg ‘aOTpBAN “tooud yey ULOAy ee oes NOULH ‘I 66 uojduey *) 96 ous2y ‘I 16 PUG “A 96 PUTT "AM 26 Wapsie]y “OD FG uospny *¢ eG uemdeyy "A 36 JAULIET "f 16 UDI “06 Wosyv1O ‘f 68 esuyvoy ") gg ueaoy “Y Lg “puvjsug Ul | 29ST “og Axenuve 5 gost ‘E Areniqaq *puvpoug Ul gost ‘t Axenaqo,y 8981 898T 898T S98T LO8T 9981 9981 Oercccese Oovreesee Te yorryy *{ Areniqay Orreocosem “3 yeeooos wy ‘0S = “AON og “AON ‘oe = “ydag ‘IS 10q0}00 st yengny LOST LOST L98t LOSI LOST L98T LOST LOSI LOSI LOST LOSI LOST LOST LOST 9981 9981 9981 Avy fe py Avy Avy Tudy TEdy Tole yy ole yy ole yy qorey Tore “Qo “Qe “Qa oun [Edy Indy eoe BlUIG 00[003T oI VpuIrs Ins}Uy) epuvg oT AOUYON'T Inyny {NBII BlULS VIO V 0740 yqeisog hd Gels Byynoeg BUS ns BOHM OIL e UONTUUTTY “A SIT uemayeg "OQ FIL e Aaqsvy ‘9D SIT = TAMIL “fF ZIT oh 91389 ‘0 IIL oe sortvy “f OIL = uessng *V 60L s Wr “A 8Or “© UOSUIMIEM “AN LOT fe Aauoow "f 90T ste o100N “GOL ig pvoidg °9 POT rg Tey “¢ SOT ae Asuoow “T ZOr * ApoqsurypoH “Wt LOL ve IJ, L001 ( b% ) "UMOM 910M So uoufordwo yuose1 a nae: g981 “¢ = yorvyy | ontd ig oa gost @ — yoauyy |“ eye) gost Oe “AON gost ‘% Yoana | [WIS Sages sost ‘Lt “aoa | ond spear 1) ar ) Co jneunyy oe gost “OL = “4a |“ vasy ‘sees gost Or = “ao | vats acy gost ‘s ‘aog | ana00]y We eaabes gogt ‘2 ‘qoa | *™ jneuny 69st ‘or * “3dog| sor ‘T ‘Qa |°" — SopurT avy gost ‘oe ‘aont| Lost ‘er Aime | omnd gost og “on | Lost ‘OE Ame | vjwrs spuvisug uz] gost ‘Ig wore | LOST ‘st oung puryrg gost “0g “son’| Lost ‘g —oung] wyqnoywy angle Bete _oovyd qUyAd WOT “oe VI "TL OLT WALT "D GBL JAVMIIS *M 8ZI sUIVoHT “S LEI BULYVOW “dA 9ZT Mo8td *g GE TUN “AL FST asvodl "0 SEI PALWT A B21 XAN 'f 130 yous'T "Vv Oct yousy ‘T, 611 S10301D *M SLL STIOM “f LIT To) To) fencing egenneneentannaerteeneneahine eae i} *puvpsury ut | 698L" Ade 90900) OOP sprere 698T Cs vives ¢ . 08 AON wer oen oes ooo eee eee 698 698T 6981 6981 ‘898T 898T 8981 8981 8981 898T 898T 8981 8981 8981 8981 8981 ‘OL ‘or Arvnuve ‘, “0G SG 16 qoT | °° "qo 1040490) 1090490 1040400) 19G040C) |": ysnony Avy Avy |" tudy ; yore | Your yy yore yy | *** hee qorwyy.} °° ord ko ans} 11ta /) OFF vlUrg 9091003 OV oI OLOYU'T 91009201057 Bary Brats wyson(] OWI aOY[VOG oLOYV'T ovWE OIC | 1O}OIIO “DO LOL 19jN0g ‘F, OPL woA(L *V SPL surydoyt ‘a VHT S130 SPL Aoyooog "H ZPL Aoyooog ‘gq TPL Aoyooog 1) OPE pAlvuod'y "HE GET LOWAVO “1 SET TPA Vg ‘OT LEL LOPOOU MA, “UW OSL . qusey “Hoey Avian, “LL Pel UIMpPOOH "ff SST PILL “FS SEL Sompy ‘A TE oe ( 56) 6981 *say100ryy ‘aSay -[OM WOsvMloyy, 94} 10oJ possvg | 698T ‘TMOUY OTOL ‘om “guowAo[due yuesotg eee cervre ere revere see enters ‘oy tog} 69st of eenecoeore ‘0g “AON eeaeeeoee. oqeetteee. eos .ee7 208 earqearee Groves ere *[VAOMIOYT JO 078 698 “9 = Yue] 6981 “G¢ = Your 6981 ‘F = Your g qoreyy 6981 ‘96 “49. 6981 ‘6L "q9,7 698I ‘6L “qq 698t “ZL = “40T 698I “SI “40 698 ‘eI “Got 698L “el “497 6981 ‘IL . “49a 698L ‘IL “4 *MOISsSIUpY Jo oye ig oI ra BUI ve MOvVs1004) ag e1odoypryq a VSIIg “Fu [neu yy us e1odoopeg git e1odioynzoyy 3 a bt» “<4 vi3y eon savy * ot exe e10daz019,J see Avimny{ “T 09L tWerpny “AH 69L 9uo}s “f 8oL Auog “Hf LOT suosivg ‘Hf 9ST sonny Sob seme *M FST PLPFAIAH *M EOL UTE WP] “A CEL OPPTH *M TST WBMOHIW *§ OST SMoIPUY “f 67L SMoIPUY VY SFL ‘aoutd JVyA WOT “ONVN ) 57 6981 698T GB 1940790 | 69ST Rsaben ses GOST eovceeeee 698T peoatices 69ST weccesesa 69ST pssosnees GOST sevsesees 69ST Gar 6981 Sesodipee 698T pes 698T ror 69ST Pcp 698T ‘Te ysnony } 6981 ono idysuo yy aloye'T elurs Byequa{) 9ay1003 oI op rele yd ooyyeqng ooTyequg BTW vale doyIOoY 9epUlg [RAVIT youedzityT “AM ELE sso" “f SLI Te ysreyt “A LT SoBTT2M “VY OLT TToUULD *f 69T Yovuvarvy “He SOT ysvuvavy "T LOT s1930% “‘O 99T s1os0y "T GOL ArvoT.0 ‘0 F9L ouoysuyot 0 €9T STA *O GIL Avin ‘a LoL ROT eee ere ’ a ‘reas soesnveee . fargr te 7 My = : oe rienp: x ) oe bate a vf i © - Fad i a a he! on — oo - ee. a S alee hak : nese nee ¢ * bf 5h v ‘ 4 | , er a ee TED = L } untae, LA ‘ “J a oJ” { cr. = 4 rad a a ~é- at ’ eset eee ; & “saa tee ae OPO op waa . , ‘ ae 7 Heth > | onan ee ary s: in grein Pat p 4 oe ' Py FRA ft a ~ ig oats Bo ae pox" 7 : os pee pea ee eee NOTE ON THE RELIGIOUS ELEMENT ined arte th tA iS IN EDUCATION IN INDIA Seneetietieiincte goat en It was bearing important testimony to the value of the labours of missionary bodies in the cause cf education, when Mr. Howell wrote in his Report in 1870, referring to the destructive effect, as regards Hinduism, of Government education in India, “it is impossible to say how far native society might not have been dis- organized, had not the missionaries stepped in and supplied a new direction to the awakening scepticism, and a fresh subject to attract the newly aroused spirit of speculation.” from religion had been perceived by those who knew India well. The writer has heard that experienced: and thoughtful official, Sir Donald MacLeod, express grave apprehensions for the results, and the despatch from which we quoted above, as well as other expressions of opinion entitled to respect, shew that these! apprehen- sions were well founded. Gen bes Sebrelt Yaa 30 Zabel d The dangers involved in education apart. ~ wes ( ( 2 ) That the Government system of education has a direct tendency to undermine the religious beliefs of the natives of India is too clear to admit of question. In1833, Macaulay wrote— “No Hindu, who has received an English “education, ever remains sincerely attached to “his religion. Some continue to profess it as “a matter of policy; but many profess them- “selves pure Deists, and some embrace Chris- “tianity.” Mr. Howell wrote—* The Bengali “ undergraduate has had a fair vernacular educa- “tion and has gained at least a superficial know- “ledge of English, but he is possibly, I may “say probably, if from a Government School, “ without any religious belief at all.” Dr. Macnamara, at the opening of the Session of the Medical School of the West- minster Hospital, in October 1878, spoke thus his experiences, which derive value from his long practice in Calcutta. “ Oursystem of education “has broken down all faith in religion, and the “outcume of a purely secular training has “developed gross materialism and rank social- ‘ism, and so the necessity for suppressing the “outspoken sentiments of the vernacular press, “which nevertheless gave utterance to opinions “he had heard over and over again for ‘some years past among all classes of “ natives.” GF) These, and similar testimonies, have been collected in a remarkable pamphlet lately published in Edinburgh,* As Government cannot teach Christianity in its schools, the curriculum of Government education embraces no religious teaching what- ever. This serious defect the author proposes to remedy by astrict adherence to the policy of the Despatch of 1854, and an increase of aided schools. So important indeed does some religious element appear to be in educating the young, that possibly some Christian men, and perhaps even some missionaries, would consider it preferable to have a child instructed in Hindu or Mahommedan fashion than without any religious element in his education at all. Ina pampblet entitled the ‘‘ Mahomedans in India,” by Syed Amir Ali, published in 1872, the unpopularity of English Government schools with the Mahomedans is openly discussed, and is ascribed to the “absence of sufficient moral training.”—“ The proud and sensitive Mahomedan is shocked and disgusted with this result of western education. In horror and *:< Qur educational policy in India,” by the Revd, James John: ston, Edinburgh, Maclaren and Son, 1879 oe) fear he keeps or takes his sons from places where, instead of learning the amenities of life under the vaunted auspices of English educated men, they soon forget to pay a decent regard to the requirements of good breeding.” ‘ Ask any Mahomedan,” the author continues, “ from the North West Provinces or Berar, why he does not allow his sons the benefits of English educa- tion, he will answer by pointing to its general results.”* The fact is that, with the Mahomedan, religion and learning are almost synonymous terms, and their disassociation is, to his mind, little short of infidelity. Nor indeed is it different with the Hindoo ; but owing probably to the conditions of his religion, he parts with the religious element in education more readily. A certain unwillingness on the part of Maho- medan gentlemen to send their sons to Gov- ernment Schools has probably existed in North India. We need not be surprised to find that in Christian Mission Schools, where the Christian religion and morality is taught, and a thoroughly good secular education given along with it, good results have been obtained in the general capacity and character of the men trained, * It must be admitted that of late years Mahomedans seem to be | more inclined to take advantage of Government education. oF Sir Bartle Frere, whose experience of India was great, and whose knowledge of men will not be questioned, has stated that “the influence of education in missionary schools was, in his opinion, of the best kind, and, in some respects, superior to that which Government Schools afforded. A gentleman at the head of an important public department had expressed an opinion that whenever he had a clerk more than usually attentive to his duties and respectful in his manner, he was sure to find, somehow or other, that he came from Dr. Duffs school. The result of Missionary education was a better dis- position and nioral character than the Govern- ment schools generally turned out, There was but too much truth in the statement that the pupilsin the Government Colleges were pre- sumptuous and conceited.” This testimony some Indian officials may possibly corro- borate. But in respect of the duty of Government to lead the people themselves to develope the higher education, and to assume itself the responsibility of extending, as far as possible, primary education, it seems very important that the principles of the Despatch in regard to grants-in-aid should be fully carried out, and that grants should be given widely, and qua som} secular education, to all schools and educational institutions without distinction of creed, on the conditions now in force and understood, 1879. W. CotpstreamM, Note —The writer is not in a position to state whether moral results similar to those noted by Sir Bartle Frere as the outcome of education in Christian mission schools have been observed among the pupils of such institutions as the Calcutta Madrassa and the Hindu College, but there is perhaps a growing conviction that it is well to recognise a religious element in education for all classes and creeds. This conviction might not improbably be found to be shared by scme adminis- trators who are zealous Christians, and even perhaps by some Missionaries and Church dignitaries. It is better, they may feel, that a sentiment of reverence to God should be fostered, and a recognition of the great moral duties which all acknowledge, should be implanted with a religious sanction in the minds: f the young, even should the worship of that God be “ignorant,” and the religion a strange one. W.C., May, 1882. ar s < ‘OUR EDUCATIONAL POLICY IN INDIA. Sah irate TROY read yi ieee se Hite ae Mert 1074 . A Gital Question FOR THE GOVERNMENT AND THE CHURCH. BY REV. JAMES JOHNSTON, "inns ganda “ial ella MSR apt SENIOR MINISTER OF ST. JAMES’S FREE CHURCH, aL aSeOW “The main object of the despatch” of 1854, containing the valuable Code of Education for India, ‘‘is to divert the efforts of the Government from the education of the higher classes, upon whom they had up to that date been too exclusively directed, and to turn them to the wider diffusion of education among all classes of the people, and especially to the provision of primary instruction for the masses.”—Parliamentary Blue Book, 1870. “« And now, after a lapse of twenty years, the emergent unavoidable question is, Why are there wae not plain indications of its speedy accomplishment? Is it not owing to the lack of faithfulness to its principles in the Education Department, tolerated and connived at by the Bengal* + Government.”— Allahabad Mission Conference, 1873. ©. Tt is the moral and not the military question which stands first in the order of ideas, with reference to the power of England in India, as much as with reference to the power in ppeeud itself, of the State over the people.” —A British Statesman. EDINBURGH: JOHN MACLAREN & SON. LONDON: JAMES NISBET & CO. 18709. PREFAT ORY N OTE: WE have arrived at a crisis in the history of education in India. It demands the earnest attention of every Christian and patriot, and it will require combined and continued effort to accomplish the end desired by the wise and benevolent men who drew up the Despatch of 1854, and by those distinguished missionaries, with Dr. Duff at their head, who established schools and colleges for Christian education. The spread of information, such as I have endeavoured, at the request of friends, to present in a plain and trust- worthy form, must be our first work. I shall be glad to hear from any who are willing to assist in this important undertaking. J.J. SunnyLaw, BripGE-or-ALLAN, 15th May, 1879. OUR EDUCATIONAL POLICY IN INDIA. et I PROPOSE to treat briefly of the educational methods by Object in which the Government of our country has sought, to bestow wee the benefits of a higher civilisation, and the Church of Christ, to confer the still higher blessings of Christianity on our empire in India, to show what the results of those methods have been, and to call attention to certain changes, in the present modes of procedure, which seem essential to the attainment of the important ends desired by the Church and the Government. The subject is both important and urgent. It bears directly on the highest wellbeing of two hundred millions of our fellow-subjects, it involves the stability of our empire in India, it affects the higher interest of the kingdom of God. A BRIEF HISTORICAL SKETCH. There are three periods of our history in India which Three periods. may be characterised by their appropriate symbols—the ell- wand, the sword, and the sceptre. The first, or mercantile, which still continues an important feature, had an imperial style and stamp upon it from the first, and the military character of our rule, which has existed side by side with the earliest adventures of commerce, is still painfully prominent in the third period of settled government; still, as we shall show, there is a marked predominance of the three characteristics, trade, conquest, and legislation, at the periods referred to. First PERIop.—TRADE. For about a hundred years trade was the special, we may East India say the exclusive, object of the East India Company.* By Company. * Appendix A. The Company afflicted with earth-hunger, Trade tribute. 4 the habits of its members, as well as the nature of its con-. stitution, it could not be otherwise. It is expressly laid down in the original charter, that the Company was to con-. sist of merchants only. In the language of the period, “no: gentlemen were to be members of the Company,” and so. tenacious were the ‘‘Governor and Company” of this: feature of their charter, that when the Court party wished to: give the command of the first fleet of merchantmen to Sir Edward Michelborne, they refused his services. on the ground of his being a gentleman, saying they “would sort their business with men of their own quality.” Until the end of the seventeenth century gain was the great pursuit. It is not pleasant to look back upon the means employed for the attainment of their sordid ends, and it is not my; intention to form an estimate of the character of the men,. or the morality of their commercial transactions. The ex-- tension of trade, protection of their monopoly, and large: profits were the ends they never lost sight of, and which they: pursued with a courage, sagacity, and perseverance worthy of the highest aims of moral agents—the pursuit of virtue,, the good of men. SECOND PERIOD.—CONQUEST. It was not until the year 1689 that the East India Com-- pany entered on a new line of policy. In that year we find: them openly aspiring to independent authority in the East. In the language of Mr. Mill, ‘‘ It was then laid down as a. determined object of policy that independence was to be established in India, and dominion acquired.” At that date- they wrote to their agents: ‘‘The increase of our revenue: is the subject of our care as much as our trade.” They resolved to be “a nation in India,” and held up to their servants the.example of the Dutch, who, they say, in sending” advices to their governors, ‘‘ wrote ten paragraphs regarding: tribute for one relative to trade.” This tribute they evidently looked on not as a revenue for the maintenance of a government ruling for the benefit of the people, but as a new and fruitful source of profit to the Company. Conquest was sought, not from motives of ambition, that “infirmity of noble minds;” but from the: 5 dower and more degrading infirmity—the love of money. It is true that ambitious men often got the power into their own hands, and aimed at conquest more for its own sake than for the material advantages to be gained; and what seemed incidental circumstances often led to wars which were far from profitable to the Company., A mysterious AhigherPower hand seemed to lead them on from one war of defence or 1*s: aggression to another, until by the end of another century the trading Company had become masters of an empire more populous than that of Alexander or the Cesars. Up to this time we can trace no well-defined, far less systematic, plans for the benefit of India. Great generals, able gover- nors, good men did appear and strove hard to introduce beneficent plans for the government of the country or the benefit of portions of it over which ‘they had control; but the system was adverse to any great or beneficent measures, a selfish policy of gain and aggrandisement was the order of the day. THIRD PERIOD.—LEGISLATION. It was not until about the beginning of the present century that we find a clear and decisive change in the policy of the Company; and that originated not from within, but from without. It was in the British Parliament that the change was effected. The charter of the Company had to be renewed every Responsibility twenty years, and new powers were claimed by Parliament cence as the possessions of this imperial trading corporation in- creased; a sense of responsibility began to manifest itself in the Legislature when the subject was discussed in 1798. It was not, however, until the renewal of the charter in 1813 that the conscience of the country was really aroused to a sense of the solemn obligations which our great power and vast territories in India imposed. It was to a small body of men that we owe the begin- The ‘Clapham ning of a new era in our relations with India—a compact Ai phialans of true patriots, whose greatness arose from the soundness of their moral principles and the purity of their. motives, and whose power sprang from the strength of their convictions. The same noble band of men who achieved Charter of 1813. Our responsi- bility national and personal, 6 the emancipation of the slaves in the West Indies, were the means of introducing into East India sound principles of government and the blessings of education and religion. The contest was keen, but what the wisdom and experi- ence of Grant and the eloquence of Wilberforce failed to obtain in 1793 was secured in 18138. The movement in the direction of a higher moral tone in the government of India, and a desire to improve the condition of the people, to liberate them from many of their own barbarous and immoral customs, and to free the government from sinful complicity in the idolatrous practices of the heathen, were greatly aided by the writings of Claudius Buchanan, the son of a Scotch schoolmaster, under the patronage of distinguished Indian statesmen such as Lord Wellesley and Lord Minto. Buch- anan was sent out by Mr. Henry Thornton, one of the leaders of the ‘Clapham men,” as a chaplain to the Company. From the year 1781 the Legislature had been asserting its right to a voice in the government of India, at first through one of the responsible advisers of the Crown, and a few years after by a ‘“ Board of Control,” and in 1793 several members of the Privy Council were placed upon the “Board” with large powers in all matters of imperial policy. In 1813 the monopoly of the trade with India was abolished, and that with China followed in 1823. In fact, “the Company” as a body of traders practically ceased to exist. Instead of each of its members and servants, as. at first, being of the trading class, none of the employees of the Government are now allowed to engage in trade on their own account, and as one consequence of this change of policy, the character of the service has from that time gone on in the march of improvement, and for many years the public servants of the Crown in India have been as distin- guished for honour, justice, and benevolence as they had always been for talent, energy, and courage. It is not, however, my intention to describe the nature of the new charter or the effects of its operation. I refer to the change for two reasons. First, to call attention to the fact, that the nation has been from that time responsible for the government of 7 India, and, that we are individtally respi osible for the action of our Government in the East, as we. ‘at. home,—that we cannot escape from our obligation i duties towards our fellow-subjects in India. We are all the more under moral obligations to our Government fellow-subjects in India from the fact, that«they have no ye | representative voice in the choice of their rulers. They are still, and for many a day must continue to be, governed as a | conquered race. Our government is p@@rnal vn form, we Should be are the more bound to see that it is paternal in character. pt ae We The position of our country_as a Christian nation, with the destiny of two hundred m¥flions of an alien race in our hands, is the most solemn ever assigned by an overruling Providence to any nation upon earth. This sense of respon- sibility is intensified by the consideration, that these millions of our fellow-subjects are nearly all Muhammadan or heathen. My second reason, for calling attention to the change in Reform must the relation of the Legislature to the people of India, is to ee a arrest attention on this other fact, that the most important and beneficent measures for the amelioration and improve- ment of the condition of the native of India have been carried out by the Home Government. Great and good men in India have originated and planned most valuable measures, but under the old régume they were comparatively powerless to carry them into effect. The interests of trade and profits stood in the way, and blinded the eyes of the Directors to any change merely for the benefit of the native. But since the establishment of the “ Board of «=~ Control” in 17938, and by more recent measures, Parliament have taken the reins into their own hands, there is a desire to rule for the higher and unselfish ends of government. The heart and conscience of the nation have, to a large extent, been reached, and do now sincerely seek the good of India. If the attention of the Government and the sympathy of Parliament can be fixed on any real grievance, there is a fair prospect of its removal; and, convince our rulers at home of any obvious benefit to be sought by legislation, and if practicable, there is hope that it will be conferred. Under the old rule in India a deaf ear was turned to any change etfve population; and even now ome of the most important assed into law, owing to the ay of the Administration in India, by the prdudices of nat of the old residents, and still more by the ho interests and selfish claigs which spring up like the rank weeds of the tropics, and choke the good seed of benevolent legislation. @ impréverent , It is in this oy that Indian questions must be taken must originate re ‘ athome. up, and it is by the Houses of Parliament that measures "must be carried,and their executi nvigilantly watched. With the assistance of the abie and ®perienced members of the Council for India, it can be most advantageously done. In saying this, I make no reflection on the disinterestedness and benevolence of the Government in India. Their position and circumstances are such that they often cannot carry out their best schemes. Like all local governing bodies, they are at a disadvantage ; on the one hand, subject to the authority of the Home Government, and, on the other, exposed to the obstructions or the influence of interested parties, or the clamour and opposition of the discontented on the spot. We know the difficulties of local. governments in our own country, on a small scale, and among an enlightened people. It is far worse there, amidst a host of ignorant and excitable natives, easily led by a handful of clever agitators. It is a real kindness in the Government and Council in this country, to limit and guide the Government and Council in India. ~~ Character of This third period is one in which the ages of commercial “- third period. an : : Py adventure and military conquest are dominated by a higher | and nobler spirit than those which preceded it—a spirit by no means tame or unambitious, but, on the whole, a more peaceable and less aggressive age—an age in which war was more of a necessity for the sake of peace, or what might perhaps be thought a more secure frontier. Commerce may have become less dignified when deprived of the stately crutches of monopoly, and the keen edge of a cutting com- petition may have lowered her moral tone. The military spirit has not been at rest, and legislative measures have 7 Higher tone. been far from satisfactory. Still; io one can dispassionately ra read the history of our rule in India, from the beginning obstructions put 1 9 of the present century, without feeling that—-he is in the Measures. presence of a high-minded and earnest race of men, seeking to fulfil the grave responsibilities laid upon them by the possession of such an empire. After a careful perusal of many of the voluminous “ Blue Books” laid before Parliament from year to year, I can testify to an evident desire to promote the welfare of that great country committed to us by a mysterious Providence. The careful 1 eee made every year i@to the state of the Careful over- country, as to its “material and moral progress,” and the 8" working of its educational institutions, the minute and elaborate reports with statistical tables, drawn up with great labour, are unmistakable evidences of an earnest solicitude for the general welfare of the country, worthy, in most respects, of a wise and paternal government. If from measures we turn to the men who have governed Character of India, we are struck by the large number in every depart- Bape nes ment, civil and military, who distinguished themselves, and shed a lustre on our country by their character and deeds— to name them all would crowd our pages, to name a few would be invidious. The highest moral and intellectual powers of true manhood have been illustrated by them on a stage so conspicuous, and a scale so large, that they have not only benefited vast multitudes by their noble deeds, but have fired the imagination and roused the emulation of the youth of our country. Our rule in India has enlarged the views and stimulated the virtues of our rulers and our people. The one grand error which has vitiated almost all our A fundamental relations to the people of India, and to which my subject requires that I call attention, is our neglecting te acknowledge God in the government of that country—worse than nibelete: our deliberate and persistent determination not to honour the God of heaven in our official acts, not even in the educa- tion of the people. I frankly admit the difficulty of the position. It would have required great faith as well as great courage, in the little band of adventurers who first laid the foundation of our empire—a mere handful in the presence of an over- whelming host of fanatical idolaters, or still more fanatical Difficulty admitted. An oppor- tunity missed. Not a practical question at present, 10 Muhammadans—to proclaim their determination to rule in the name of the one God of the Christian, and to regulate their government by the principles of His sacred Book. Though I am convinced, that even then, their character would have been more respected, and their rule more trusted by the heathen, had they frankly declared thei faith and principles. I also admit that when our Home Government took the direct responsibility for the government of India into their own hands, they were hampered by the legacy of that rule, and the practice and precedent of so many years’ standing. The revolt of 1857, which cancelled unrighteous obliga- tions, abolished dual government, and led to direct imperial rule, was a grand opportunity for a reversal of the vicious policy of their predecessors, while the open proclamation. of its continuance, turned, that which had been formerly the offence of individuals, or the errors of a Company, into a national sin, and an imperial injury to India.” A Government surrounded by and ruling over a vast population, which had been accustomed to perform every act, whether good or bad, private or public, in the name of a God, was placed in a false and perilous position by its neutrality. The Hindu invoked his god at all times, and in everything he did; and his rulers, whether native or foreign, heathen or Muhammadan, ruled in the name of their god. The native could not understand any other basis or authority for government than the Divine. To assert authority on the ground of mere force or military superiority was a deeper degradation to him. With his primitive notions, he would have preferred to be ruled by a people whose God had given them power to subdue them; and if the government exercised in His name, had been from the first wise and tolerant and just, we would have gained his obedience and respect, if not his affection and confidence. But this, I fear, is not now a practical question. It is vain to hope for any radical and beneficial change in present cir- cumstances. It would now excite a not unreasonable suspicion to introduce a change, without some adequate and obvious grounds for an alteration of policy. Circum- * See Appendix B. 11 stances may arise to justify such a step, but as I cannot see how they can arise, except through another revolt, or some justification of a great display of our power, and a call for a fresh proclamation of our authority, I dare neither desire nor advocate sucha change. I could not avoid asserting the principle, both because it 1s sound in policy, and because of its bearing on the question of education. The want of a Divine authority, and a sacred rule of action Want of a : - ; Divine autho- to appeal to, became painfully manifest when Government, rity, rule, and under a sense of its responsibility, took steps to elevate the ™°#ve moral as well as the intellectual condition of the people. This came out in the despatches of the earlier half of the present century. We have an illustration of this want of an adequate rule and motive in a despatch of the Court of Directors of 1827. They dwelt ‘‘ on the importance of raising up educated natives of high moral character for the discharge of public duties.” They say: “ To this, the last and highest object of educa- tion, we expect that a large share of your attention will be applied. We desire that the discipline of these [educational] institutions may be mainly directed towards raising among the students that rational self-esteem which is the best security against degrading sins; and we particularly direct that the greatest pains may be taken to create habits of veracity and fidelity, by inspiring the youth with a due sense of their importance, and by distinguishing, with the approbation of Government or its discontinuance, those who do, or do not, possess these qualifications.” Now, nothing could be better than the aim of this despatch and the zntentions of the Directors. To elevate the moral character, to inculcate veracity and fidelity, to bestow rewards on the upright, and withdraw them from the dishonest, are most important. We applaud the aims and honour the Directors for their good intentions. But mark the utter inadequacy of means to the end. There is no moral standard to appeal to, no Divine authority to overawe or encourage, no future rewards beyond the temporary salaries of the inferior offices in the Company’s service. They cannot quote the purer portions of the Shastras, the better portions of the Koran, nor the sacred Poor substi- tutes. The system a failure, Historical sketch from 1813. 12 words of Scripture—that would be teaching religion. They dare not appeal to the authority of the many gods of heathen- ism, the one God of Islam, nor the Triune God of Christianity —that would be theology. Their system shuts them out from an appeal to the rewards and punishments of a future state. The transmigrations of the Hindu, the paradise of the Muhammadan, and the heaven of the Christian are all excluded as beyond the prescribed region of the secular instruction to which they have limited the entire circle of knowledge. The only standard to which they can direct the youth of India is a “‘ RATIONAL SELF-ESTEEM,” which they declare is “ the best securityagainst degrading vices.” The only motives - to virtuous action are hope of the rewards of Government service, and the fear of their withdrawal. In other words, self-esteem is made to take the place of conscience. ‘“‘ The Company ” takes the place of a personal Divine Providence, and the payment or withdrawal of paltry wages are to be the rewards and punishments of the educated natives of India. Is it surprising that suth a system of education should fail? That the “rational self-esteem” should in the great majority of cases develop itself in the form of intolerable self-conceit; and that “John Coompany,” as this new divinity was irreverently called by the precocious youths who had been emancipated from all faith in the more formidable gods of their fathers, should be regarded as a usurper or imposter,—his rewards, when bestowed, received without gratitude, and when withheld his authority despised and his government hated ? When such principles are adopted, and such a position assumed, by a company of merchants, however respectable, it excites contempt or ridicule; when accepted by a Christian government it calls forth a deep sense of humiliation and sorrow. INTRODUCTION AND INFLUENCE OF GOVERNMENT EDUCATION. It is desirable that we briefly sketch the origin, the diffu- sion, and results of the Government education in India. In renewing the charter in 1813, Parliament required, 13 in addition to many material advantages conferred on the natives, and religious privileges given to the Christian Church and to the British residents in India, that the modest sum of £10,000 should be devoted by the Company to the encouragement of education, This sum was expended partly in improving and extending the higher vernacular education of the natives, and still more in encouraging the study of the Eastern classics—Sanscrit, Arabic, and Persian —and in the translation of scientific and classic works from the English into the vernacular languages of India. At the commencement of that period the use of English as a medium of education was not thought of. The origin of the idea of using the English language as Origin of the a means of educating the youth of India, and introducing een ae them to the rich treasures of the Western literature— &™8* treasures greater far than the gold and precious stones of India, which for centuries fired the imagination and excited the cupidity of Europe, for some time baffled inquiry. I looked for some great genius as the founder of such a system, and for profound philosophic princfples on which its founda- tion had been laid, but looked in vain. It was not until long after the system had been in practice, and its influ- ence felt, that philosophers discussed it, and Government adopted it. From missionary notices, it appeared that in 1818 the Serampore Mission established a school for teaching English to the natives of India, without requiring their attendance on religious exercises, and in the same year Dr. Inglis, who was the founder of educational missions, preached a sermon in Edinburgh, in which he urged the adoption of the English language as the means for attracting the Hindus, and bringing them under the influence of the Gospel. On further inquiry, however, it was apparent that while the employment of English as a moral or missionary agency in India was first used or advocated by Marshman and Inglis, the discovery was made, like many great discoveries, by a seeminy accident, but what was in reality the carrying out of the simple law of supply and demand. There had long been a felt need for a knowledge of English by the natives, for the sake of employment in English families and warehouses, and Mr. Hare’s school. A native scholar’s re- collections, 14 as the prospect of service of a humble kind in Government offices opened up, the demand increased. It was in this state of matters that a benevolent watch- maker in Calcutta, of the name of Hare, taking pity on the many half-caste children who were growing up in ignorance and depravity, neglected by their unnatural fathers, and cast off by native society, to which their mothers belonged, which had no place for them in its rigid system of caste, opened a free school for their instruction. Mr. Hare at first received only these outcast Eurasian children, but as they formed a connecting link with the Hindus, it led to earnest applica- tion for admission on the part of the natives, to which he generously responded. The system spread in Calcutta, and: was soon introduced into the other cities where any con- siderable body of English residents were settled. The origin and progress of the study of the English language is graphically described by one who is himself an illustrious example of what education can do for the Hindu, when the study of literature and science is based on moral principle and Christian truth, resulting in his case, not only in the highest culture, but in Christian character. The Rev. Lal Behari Day, in his “ Recollections of Dr. Duff,” repeats the old story of the dhobi, or washerman, who was the first to acquire a few English words when washing the linen of a ship’s company 1n1634,and to teach them to his countrymen. “In 1774,” he says, “a stimulus was given to a desire for English amongst respectable Bengalis by the establishment of the Supreme Court in Calcutta, but the only aids to the study were one or two spelling-books or vocabularies of very limited extent.” ‘In course of time,” he goes on to say, “ some Eurasians in Calcutta lent their services to the cause of native education. They went to the houses of rich Baboos and gave instruction in English. They received pupils into their own houses, which they turned into schools. Under the auspices of these men the curriculum of studies was en- larged. To the ‘Spelling Book’ and the ‘Schoolmaster’ were added the ‘Tales of a Parrot,’ the ‘ Elements of English — Grammar,’ and the ‘Arabian Nights’ Entertainments.’ The man who could read and understand the last-mentioned book was reckoned in those days a prodigy of learning. 15 “The year 1817 is a memorable time in the history of English education in Bengal. In that year the Hindu College was established. The honour of originating that institution belongs to David Hare, a watchmaker in Calcutta. The rough plan which he had sketched of the institution fell into the hands of Sir Edward Hyde East, then Chief Justice of the Supreme Court in Calcutta, who liked the proposal, and took measures for reducing it to practice. This institution, which was at first a school of very humble character, rose into a college chiefly through the exertions of the great Sanscrit scholar, Horace Hayman Wilson, who was Secretary to the Committee of Public Instruction, appointed in 1823 by Government. The success of the Hindu College induced some native gentlemen to set up private schools, the most eminent of which was the Oriental Seminary. The attainments of the youths attending these schools, but especially the Hindu College, were considerable. They were familiar with the historical works of Hume, Robertson, and Gibbon; with the economic works of Adam Smith and Jeremy Bentham; with the philosophical works of Locke, Reid, and Dugald Stewart; and with the poetry of Shakespeare, Milton, Dryden, Pope, Burns, and Scott. “Such was the state of English education when Duff reached Calcutta in 1830.” The demand for education increased with the openings made for employment in the public works which the Govern- ment began in the earlier part of the present century to carry on for the material benefit of the country. And when the Government offices and Civil Service were thrown open, in certain departments, to the natives, the spur of ambition was added to the love of gain, to intensify the already strong desire to acquire English, which was not only the key of knowledge, but the door to wealth and honour in the eyes of the poor and down-trodden races of India. The arrival of Alexander Duff in Calcutta in the year Dr. Duff's 1830 formed a new era in education and in missions in" India. Though the founder of neither, his methods were as original as they were important. His clear judgment saw the true significance of the state of society in the capital. His intrepid spirit at once entered on an independent line Introduction of religion. English versus vernacular languages, 16 of action, different from that of his predecessors, and the many good and honoured men who were at work around him. In direct opposition to the letter of his instructions from the committee which sent him out; instead of going as directed to some quiet rural district of the country, or employing the English language as a mere educational pro- cess, as had been done by Mr. Hare and the Government, or introducing timidly a little religion at a stated hour when the heathen were at liberty to absent themselves, as was then done at the institution in Serampore, he gave it distinctly to be understood that he was a religious teacher, that his great aim was the conversion of the pupils, and that educa- tion, with all its importance, was only a means to a higher end—the formation of the character and the salvation of the soul. But while education was only a means to an end, he manifested his sense of its importance, and with all his charac- teristic fervour and indomitable energy, he set himself to adapt a system of instruction so thorough and perfect, that within a few months Duff’s school was the wonder and admiration of Calcutta. And, in a short time, so far superior to all competitors, that in spite of the dread of his fervent piety and proselytising zeal, his school was the largest and most popular in the Presidency, and himself the most admired and loved of all the teachers in Calcutta. In 1833, when Indian affairs came for their periodical consideration before Parliament, the conscience of our country again demanded and obtained great advantages for India, and, amongst others, a great increase of money grants for education, which now began to assume a charac- ter of imperial importance. The grant of £10,000 in 1813 was increased tenfold, and great interest was excited in the question as to the best way of imparting to the natives of India the full light of western science and literature. Now burst forth in earnest the smouldering controversy between the advocates of the vernacular and English languages, as the medium of instruction. Into that controversy I cannot now enter. It is deserving of, and will demand, earnest reconsideration on an early day. Without going the length to which the “Orientalists” went, there is an important 1 principle at the base of the position occupied by such men as James and Thoby Princep, Shakespeare, and others, which must assert itself sooner or later. The importance of English cannot be over-estimated, if it be kept in its proper place, and within due limits. These have been of late overstepped, and there are symptoms of a natural reaction, which will require to be watched lest it be carried too far in the opposite direction. - It is, however, with facts, not principles, we have now to do. The battle between the advocates of the Oriental and English languages was carried on both within and outside the Council Chamber. In this contest the eloquence, and still more, the practical work of Dr. Duff were of great service; but the tide was not turned until the arrival of a powerful ally in the person of Thomas Babington Macaulay. There seemed a providence in the way Mr. Macaulay had Macaulay’s been raised up for his work in India. The son of as pure ™%* and devoted a Christian patriot as ever toiled for the poor and oppressed of our race, and trained under the influence of the “Clapham Set,” of which his father, Zachary,* was the hidden spring, Mr. Macaulay was prepared to take an enlightened and generous view of any question affecting the interests of the natives. The “minute” drawn up by him in 1835, now an Ent lish classic rather than an official paper, put an end to contro- versy, and introduced a new policy. From that date the English language has been the great subject of study in Government schools and colleges, and the medium through which all the higher branches of study are carried on. While the native classic and vernacular languages are taught, not only English literature and history, but all the sciences, and even mathematics, in which the Hindus had long excelled, are taught by English teachers in the English tongue. For twenty years this method went on increasing in efficiency and extent, and so popular is it with the natives that they required to be urged to study their own vernaculars, and it needs a bribe to get them to attend the old endowed classes for Sanscrit, Arabic, or Persian. * See Appendix C, on Zachary Macaulay. 18 DESPATCH OF 1854. We are now arrived at the most important period of our educational policy in India, and this was another proof of Importance of the importance of having the affairs of that country brought dct Garg before Parliament in such a form as to fix on our Eastern eae ques- empire that earnest attention which calls into lively exercise the intelligence and conscience of the nation. Now that the necessity for a renewal of the charter every twenty years no longer exists, it is almost impossible to get the House of Commons to listen to a debate on the most important questions affecting the welfare of the two hundred millions of our Eastern empire. Nothing less than a war which demands millions of our gold to carry it on, or a famine, by which millions of lives are carried off, will secure a hearing, and these are times which call for special shifts and tem- porary expedients, not for large and comprehensive measures. The periodic revisions of the charter, especially since the end of last century, were in reality eras in the history of our rule in India. That for 17938 sanctioned, besides material benefits, important religious advantages. These were much extended in 1813, when the first grant for education was made. In 1833 this grant was raised tenfold; and in 1853 a principle was laid down which extended it indefinitely, and in actual outlay has raised it seven or eight fold. Had the whole question been raised in a similar way in 1873, we doubt not the results would have been of equal importance and advantage to that country. peesing I give in the Appendix a summary of the famous de- despatch. spatch of 1854, issued for the Government by Sir Charles Wood (Viscount Halifax),* and shall now call attention to some of its more important features. The first is one which 2 Seay the evidently formed a main ground for the new legislation — education. V1Z., TO ENLARGE THE circle OF STUDY BY INTRODUCING A GREATER NUMBER OF USEFUL SUBJECTS INTO THE HIGHER DEPARTMENTS, AND TO EXTEND THE sphere OF EDUCATION SO AS TO REACH THE LOWER CLASSES OF SOCIETY. The despatch calls attention to the fact, that up to that time the aim seemed to have been to educate a few to a very * See Appendix D. 19 high pitch of excellence, to the neglect of the general education of the people. After referring to the importance of the subject, and the advantages to be gained, section six runs thus :— Par. 6. ‘Aided, therefore, byample experience of the past, and the most competent advice for the future, we are now in a position to decide upon the mode in which the assistance of Government should be offered TO THE MORE EXTENDED AND SYSTEMATIC PROMOTION OF GENERAL EDUCATION in India, and on the measures which should at | once be adopted to that end.” So that the extension of general education was the special aim of Government in this despatch which introduced the new policy. This view is confirmed by the tenth paragraph, which is as follows :— Par. 10. “We have also received most satisfactory evidence of the high attainments in English literature and Huropean science, which have been acquired of late years by some of the natives of India. But this success has been confined to but a small number of persons ; AND WE ARE DESIROUS OF EXTENDING FAR MORE WIDELY THE MEANS OF ACQUIRING GENERAL HUROPEAN KNOWLEDGE, OF A LESS HIGH ORDER, but of such a character as may be practically useful to the people of India in their different spheres of life. To attain this end it is necessary, for the reasons which we have given above, that they should be made familiar with the works of Euro- pean authors, and with the results of the thought and labour of Europeans on the subjects of every description upon which know- ledge is to be imparted to them; and to extend the means of imparting this knowledge must be the object of any general system of education.” To remove any doubt as to this being the aim of the Home Government, I quote the following from the thirty- ninth paragraph :— Par. 39. “ . . . The wise abandonment of the early views with regard to native education, which erroneously pointed to the classical languages of the East as the media for imparting European knowledge, together with the small amount of pecuniary aid which in the then financial condition of India was at your command, has ded, we think, to too exclusive a direction of the efforts of Govern- Colleges aided by grants to supersede Government colleges, 20 ment towards providing the means of acquiring A VERY HIGH DEGREE OF EDUCATION for a small number of natives of India, drawn for the most part from what we should here call the higher classes.” Paragraph fifty-two shows that the extension of the higher education in future is to be carried out, not by increasing the number of Government colleges, but by the system of grants-in-aid now for the first time introduced, Par. 52, “ We have, therefore, resolved to adopt in India the system of grants-in-aid which has been carried out in this country with very great success; and we confidently anticipate by thus drawing support from local resources, in addition to contributions from the State, a far more rapid progress of education than would follow a mere increase of expenditure by the Government; while it possesses the additional advantage of fostering a spirit of reliance upon local exertions and combinations for local purposes, which is of itself of no mean importance to the wellbeing of a nation.” To show that the Government intended to encourage missionary colleges and schools as well as those supported by natives and resident Europeans, the following tribute is paid to their labours in the past :— Par. 50, ‘“* At the same time, in so far as the noble exertions of societies of Christians of all denominations to guide the natives of India in the way of religious truth, and to instruct uncivilised races, . . . have been accompanied, in their educational establish- ments, by the diffusion of improved knowledge, they have largely contributed to the spread of that education which it is our object to promote.” In confirmation of our interpretation of the intention of Government, we quote the following from paragraph eighty- SIX :— Par. 86. “ . .. We confidently expect that the introduction of the system of grants-in-aid will very largely increase the number of schools of a superior order; and we hope that before long sufficient provision may be found to exist in many parts of the country for the education of the middle and higher classes, inde- pendent of the Government institutions, which may then be closed as has been already the case in Burdwan in consequence of the enlightened conduct of the Raja of Burdwan, or they may be _ transferred to local management.” 21 This shows that the Home Government not only looked to the system of grants-in-aid as a means of saving the Indian Government from spending more on the extension of the higher education than they had been expending up to that time, but that it would lead to the lessening of that expense by the withdrawal of some of the colleges then in existence. That this is the right interpretation of the despatch is placed beyond a doubt by the paragraphs sixty-one and sixty-two, which we must quote in full. We do not even take the liberty of altering the type as we have done in some other quotations :— Par. 61. “ We desire to see local management under Government inspection, and assisted by grants-in-aid, taken advantage of where- ever it is possible to do so, and that no Government colleges or schools shall be founded for the future in any district where a sufficient number of institutions exist capable, with assistance from the State, of supplying the local demand for education. But in order fully to carry out the views we have expressed with regard to the adequate provision of schools throughout the country, it will probably be necessary for some years to supply the wants of particular parts of India by the establishment, temporary sup- port, and management of places of education of every class, in districts where ane is little or no prospect of adequate Toe efforts being made for this purpose, but where, nevertheless, they are urgently required.” Mark the explicit expression of the desire for local volun- tary effort, and the caution with which any extension of higher instruction is allowed. It will only “ probably ” be required in any case, and it is only when “urgently required” that it is to be allowed, and even in such an ex- treme case it is only to be “temporary support” that is to be given. Par. 62. “ We would look forward to a time, when any general system of education, entirely provided by Government, may be dis- continued with the gradual advance of the system of grants-in-aid, and when many of the existing Government institutions, especially those of the higher order, may be safely closed, or transferred to the management of local bodies under the control of and aided by the State ; but it is far from our wish to check the spread of edu- Local effort with grants-in~ aid desired, Professional or. technical instruction. General col- leges—two classes. eR een 22 cation in the slightest degree, by the abandonment of a single school to probable decay, and we therefore entirely confide in your discre- tion, and in that of the different local authorities, while keeping this object steadily in view, to act with caution, and to be guided by special reference to the particular circumstances which affect the demand for education in different parts of India.” This needs no comment. I would only ask a second perusal of the first half of this paragraph. The aim, then, is, while keeping up the standard for a few, to “extend far more widely the means of acquiring a general European knowledge OF A LESS HIGH ORDER,’ but practically useful in every-day life. By way of enlarging the circle of study, it is proposed to introduce technical or professional schools and colleges for the study of medicine, law, engineering, industry and design, and agriculture; and by way of extending the sphere, arrange- ments are made for establishing normal schools for the educating and training of native teachers for elementary and middle schools. In fact, the spirit of the despatch breathes a generous desire’ to extend the benefits of a useful educa- tion to the whole country, instead of limiting it to a favoured few in the large cities, as had been done previously. In paragraph forty, after having called attention to the too exclusive regard hitherto paid to the education of a few of the higher class, they justly say :— “The higher classes are both able and willing, in many cases, to bear a considerable part, at least, of the cost of their education.” i The establishment of general colleges was no part of the scheme of the despatch. These were in existence before, and were of two kinds; first, ‘Government colleges ;” and by that must be understood something entirely unlike any- thing known in this country. They are built with Govern- ment money, supported by Government funds, the professors are appointed by Government, and all the arrangements are under Government authority. The pupils pay a fee of from ten to twelve rupees a-month, which goes but a little way towards the expenses of institutions which are carried on in an imperial style, and at great expense. The other colleges are supported by endowments or 23 voluntary subscriptions, from every class and denomination in the country, native and foreign, heathen, Christian, and secularist. These voluntary or private colleges were in existence before those of the Government, but received, with a few exceptions, no Government assistance or recognition, until after the new era introduced by the despatch of 1854. One of the benefits conferred by it was the en- couragement and assistance given to voluntary effort_ of every kind. ‘‘ Grants-in-aid” were an essential feature of the despatch. They were not only given—the prin- ciple is laid down again and again that it was the aim of Government to foster liberality on the part of in- dividuals and societies, and to encourage the spirit of independence and self-reliance in the natives, as of itself an important part of education. Not only so, but they declare repeatedly that it shall be a part of their plan to withdraw from the field as soon as adequate agencies can be raised up for carrying on the higher education, and to devote the money so saved to the extension of education in the rural districts, and amongst the poorer classes. UNIVERSITIES EsTABLISHED FOR THE ENCOURAGEMENT OF PRIVATE COLLEGES, SUPPORTED BY LocaL AND MIs- SIONARY RESOURCES AND “‘ GRANTS-IN-AID.” The establishment of the universities had a direct bearing The univer- on this part of their scheme, and was designed to encourage i ee independent effort, and to prepare the way for Government 1s bodies. withdrawing from the costly work of direct education. In paragraph re they say :— Par, 40. “We have, by the establishment and support of these colleges, pointed out the manner in which a liberal education is to be obtained, and assisted them to a very considerable extent from the public funds. In addition to this we are now prepared to give, by sanctioning the establishment of universities, full development to the highest course of education to which the natives of India or of any other country can aspire; and besides, by the division of university degrees and distinctions into other branches, the exertions of highly-educated men will be directed to the studies which are necessary to success in the various active professions of Despatch of 1863. Stanley’s’ despatch of 1859, 24 life. We shall, therefore, have done as much as Government can do to place the benefits of education plainly and practically before the higher classes in India.” That this was their design is made clear by the following “Extract from the Proceedings of the Government of India in the Home Department,” passed on the 29th July, 1869, in which, amongst other formal resolutions, they declared that, “ Already the Government has gone far beyond the intentions of the despatch of 1854, which declared THAT THE PROVISION OF UNIVERSITIES, as the examining bodies for higher education, WAS ALL THAT THEN REMAINED FOR THE GOVERNMENT TO Do.” * This feature of the Government plan of 1854 has been too much overlooked by the Executive in India, and is practically ignored by the officials of the universities and colleges. But here is the principle clearly established in 1854 and acknowledged in 1869—that universities were set wp for the encowragement of private and aided colleges, and that it was the design that Government colleges should eventually give place to these. THE HoME GOVERNMENT HAS NEVER CHANGED ITS POLICY SINCE 1854, Lest any should say that our Government has altered its policy of limiting direct teaching of the higher classes at its own expense, and directing its chief effort to extending education downwards to the more needy, where stimulus and aid were more required, let me call attention to the follow- ing official utterances, extending over many years, and which show that the policy is unchanged. In 18638, the Home Government thus expressed itself :— “Tt was one great object proposed in the despatch of the 19th July, 1854, to provide for the extension to the general population of those means of obtaining an education suitable to their station in life, which had hitherto been too exclusively confined to the higher classes; and it is abundantly clear, from Lord Stanley’s despatch of 7th April, 1859, that Her Majesty’s Government entertained at that time the same sentiments which had been * Blue Book, p. 468. 25 expressed by the home authorities in 1854... . But I think it necessary to declare that Her Majesty’s Government have no intention of sanctioning a departure from the principles already deliberately laid down, and that, while they desire that the means of obtaining an education calculated to fit them for their higher position and responsibility should be offered to the upper classes of society in India, they deem it equally incumbent on the Government to take, at the same time, all suitable measures for extending the benefits of education to those classes of the community ‘who,’ as observed in the despatch of July, 1854, ‘are utterly incapable of obtaining any education worthy of the name by their own unaided efforts.” * In 1864, Sir Charles Wood wrote :— Sir C. Wood in 1864. “Those principles are that, as far as possible, the resources of the State should be so applied as to assist those who cannot be expected to help themselves, and that the richer classes of the people should gradually be induced to provide for their own education.” The Duke of Argyll writes, May, 1871, to the Viceroy :— na of Argyll, Par. 5. “I should be understood as approving generally of the main principle which runs through your despatch, that the Govern- ment expenditure should, as far as possible, be reduced with reference to the education of those who are well able to pay for themselves, and should be mainly directed to the provision of an elementary education for the masses of the people.” Par. 9. “If once we can instil into the real upper classes of India, that one of the main duties of society is to provide for the sound primary instruction of the humbler classes, we shall lay the real foundation for that general system of education which it is the desire of your Excellency’s Government to establish.” Again, on 4th June, 1873, the Duke of Argyll writes to 1873. the Viceroy :— Par. 9. “In conclusion, J must express my concurrence with your Excellency in considering that the Lieutenant-Governor (Sir George Campbell) has not departed from the broad line of educa- tional policy which has been laid down by Her Majesty’s Govern- ment during a long series of years, and in cordially approving the steps his Honour has taken to give a more practical tone to education in Bengal. The advance which has been made in the * Blue Book, 1870, p. 11. 26 encouragement of the primary instruction of the people is also a subject of congratulation.” saa Campbell, Sir George Campbell, Lieutenant-Governor of Bengal, ; writes to the Director of Public Instruction, 1872 :-— “ Tt is not the policy of the Government to discourage English or high education, but it is its policy not to devote an entirely dis- proportionate amount of the funds at the disposal of the Local Government to the education of a very limited number of persons, to the comparative exclusion of the much greater number who have equal claims on the State.” Government But while these have been the plans of the Home Govern- colleges ; ; ; increased. ment, what has been the practice in India? Instead of withdrawing the Government colleges, they have doubled the number, and multiplied the cost. Instead of encouraging local effort, they have made the maintenance of colleges by missionary societies almost impossible, and what is, if stig more to be deplored, they have pauperised the richer classes of the natives by leading them to depend on Government doing almost everything for them. I admit the difficulty of withdrawing from these Government colleges when the natives have got to value and use them. But this difficulty should have induced caution in establishing new ones, all the more that Government never meant the number to be increased but rather diminished. The principle ought to have been laid down that a college could only be set up in a new locality where a stimulus to the higher education was required, by giving one up where it was no longer needed. Instead of this, what do we find? In 1854 there were only fourteen general colleges sup- ported by the Government, as I find from the Blue Book, and on inquiring at the Indiapf Office the other day, I am favoured by the following ret ‘In 1876-77 there were— Government colleges—General ; Sites: i iE Professional . apa br 46 PP) It may be said with apparent truth that twenty-nine general colleges are quite insufficient for the wants of the 27 millions of India, and even if we add the seventeen aided colleges, with a total of less than 5000 graduates in all the colleges of India, what are these among so many? Compared with the colleges in European countries, it would be miserably inadequate. But this is an inverted way of looking at the subject. We must consider the state of education in the country, the demand for the higher, and the need for the lower culture. If the natives had developed such a system, and maintained it themselves, no one could find fault; but when the vast proportion of the attention and funds of the Imperial Treasury are devoted to fostering a fictitious culture in the higher, above the wants and habits of the people, it is both unnatural and pernicious. I know the idea prevailed that education would ‘filter down” from the higher to the lower class. This, as is shown by Mr. Howell, when Under-Secretary, has proved a mere delusion and a snare. It could not but fail, when that higher culture was an exotic, taught in a foreign tongue, and by foreign teachers. There is no analogy between the English language, as taught in India, and the Latin tongue, as used on the revival of learning in Europe; and even it failed to reach the body of the people, although the priesthood read it, and the people heard it in the daily services of the Church for cen- turies before. So much is the English system unnaturally forced, that the distinctive peculiarities of Cambridge and Oxford can be traced in the universities of Calcutta and Bombay. In the “Return” for 1870, it is said (p. 49)— “There is a difference of kind between those two univer- sities, corresponding to the difference between Cambridge and Oxford. The Calcutta University has been, I believe, chiefly moulded by Cambridge men, and the Bombay University has certainly taken its direction from a prepon- derance of Oxford men among its founders.” Is India generally educated to a position for profiting by such an exotic system of horticulture ? WoRK ACTUALLY ACCOMPLISHED IN LOWER DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION. I thankfully acknowledge the large amount of good which has been accomplished in the education of the lower classes Increase of Government schools, and of private schools, Abetter system and moral tone introduced, 28 since 1854. There is a great increase in the number of children of the poorer class under direct instruction in Govern- ment schools. In 1854 there were only 40,000 youth of all classes under instruction by Government; now there are 700,000 in Government schools and colleges. In addition, they have assisted both native and missionary societies in extending their useful operations, but as there is no record of the numbers attending this class of schools before 1854, we cannot tell to what extent the grant-in-aid system has led to their numerical increase; it must have been con- siderable. Government now gives, in the form of grants-in- aid, to private schools and colleges of all classes, supported by both foreigners and natives, the sum of £112,000 a-year. I also give the present system full credit for introducing a better system of teaching, and better class-books into native schools, which are not deriving any direct benefit from grants. A higher style of teaching and better tone has been pretty largely diffused through Government example and influence. But let us look at what has been left undone, and compare the expenditure on the higher with that on the lower education,—keeping in mind that it was the object of the despatch of 1854, and has ever since been the aim of the Home Government, to extend and foster the lower and leave the higher to the influence of the universities and the resources of the richer classes, From the last returns laid before Parliament, I find the following facts. The entire sum expended from the Im- perial Treasury on education in India in 1878-79 was £730,000. I cannot show how the whole of this sum was expended, but the following items are instructive. RETURNS FOR THE YEAR 1876-77. The number educated in the 29 General Collegesis . eet 17 Special or Professional do.is 1 " 01 The number attending High Schools, the feeders for College, is 27, 760 £186, 694 are spent on . , ; ; EE of the better-off class, £85,469 are spent on . : : : , : . 641,376 of the poorer class. £92,000 are spent on the 29 colleges, with . , 3,331 students. 29 The Aided Schools and Colleges, which receive from the Imperial Treasury £112,000. Educated in 19 General Colleges, : : . 1,414 students. re 25 Normal Schools for Males, . foci fo lTE Be echee A. 13 dt. for Females, . 463, Hg 203 Schools of Higher Class, . . 36,901 pupils. bp) ited ¥ Middle, . f 90,0008 +) bl eopptete 3 Lower, . : ATO RT ae ee PeLOG » for Girls, : : AAD 319 ae, 5, 1,850 Mixed Schools, ) tl OO ORE: 723,785 It will be seen that the amount spent on the higher education 1s out of all proportion to the sum spent on the elementary, where it is far more needed. The sum £186,694 to educate highly 32,792 of the youth of India, the great majority of whom are well able to pay for their own educa- tion, while the paltry sum £85,480 is spent on 641,376 of the humbler classes, who can ill afford to pay anything, is out of all proportion. But there is another feature of this system which brings Injustice of out its positive injustice. To supplement the small amount bee nati spent on elementary instruction, a special tax is imposed for their support, which falls, directly or indirectly, chiefly on the humbler classes, while by far the greater part of the imperial funds, spent so largely on the higher education, is drawn from these same poor and neglected classes. * It adds to this injustice that the higher education is fitted and designed to qualify the favoured richer class for lucrative employments, while the elementary gives no such advantage. The imposition of this education-tax accounts for the educa- tion of half-a-million of pupils for the sum of £85,000 from the Imperial Exchequer. The tax itself is not unreasonable, but it is hard to make the same class pay for the higher education also. * It was pointed out long ago by Col. Davidson, that it costs the Government as much to educate one rich Brahmin as to support a village school with eighty pupils. At present the Government spends £27, 9s. on the education of each of the 3331 graduates in their colleges, only a fraction of whom ever take a degree, and on each of 641,000 boys in lower and middle class schools the sum of 2s. 104d., while 14,000,000 are left uncared for. 30 Inadequacy To show the inadequacy of the means employed for the ae ° education of the country, we quote the following from the returns laid before Parliament in 1870 :— Lower Class Schools and Pupils in 1870-71. | Proportion | Proportion uM o 9 Government. Population. |Schools.| Pupils. of Schools to | of Pupils to 5, Population. | Population. | — — ! —-———_—_ | - rm |) | ——————__ J i }Benpal! ey" oo. | 40,352,960 | 2,486! 66,799} 1 to 16,232| 1 to 604 2 | Madras, .| 26,539,052} 2,800] 64,298 9,478 412 3 | Bombay, . 12,889,106 | 2,772 | 148,546 4,649 86 4° 0N. SY Provinces, 30,086,898 | 3,826 | 101,300 7,863 297 5 ; Punjab, . . .; 17,596,752; 1,722| 64,827 10,218 271 6 Oadh 754. . 11,220,747} 701| 19,512 16,006 575 7 CentralProvinces, 7,985,411 | 1,236] 40,637 6,460 196 8 | British Burmah, 2,463,484 60 ot elven y aea.cd adn d havens 9.| Borara, 5)". wl “Syeaeuret, weld LU,gsn) vases 214 TOY) Ooerws sae ee 112,952 31 13074 9 Ae. 86 Total, «) <) LBL 407,406 115,92) 1-517,574) weve Ws heibeee Taking the last returns with the latest census I find the state of matters in 1877 stands thus :— Population of British India, . : : . 191,018,412 Taking one in twelve of the Popllntion as a fair proportion of those who ought to be attending elementary schools, we have, needing instruction, 15,918,201 Pupils attending Government elementary schools, . ‘ : . 550,790 Add number attending aided “spRpataue schools, . ; ‘ ‘ oh ale w. Total Government and aided schools have an attendance of , 4 : _e— 1,030,567 Number of the So that after twenty-five years of the operation of this wnedueated. famous and most valuable despatch, there are still MORE THAN FOURTEEN MILLIONS”* OF THE CHILDREN OF BRITISH INDIA, OF AGE FOR ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS, UNPROVIDED FOR BY THE GOVERNMENT. Let it not be supposed that we say all these millions are untaught. The Hindus were an educated people long before we were. * Fourteen millions is a small allowance. There are sixty-six millions in British India under twelve years of age. dl When we consider ces those who may be attending Urgency of native schools without superintendence are in the vast *>nee’ majority of instances brought up in an atmosphere morally worse than if they were allowed to run wild in a state of total ignorance, we see the vast work which remains to be done, while the money wrung from the poor ryots is squandered on pet schemes, which are producing, as we shall show, very doubtful results. There are in the returns 16,882 schools, with 332,952 children, called “ unaided,” but under a very imperfect kind of supervision or registration. We cannot reckon them with the others. The great need of elementary education is well shown in pamphlets by Sir William Hill and Lieut.-Col. Davidson,— the uneducated rural population being exposed to the ruinous exactions of money-lenders, whose cruel bonds and extortionate interest they can neither read nor calculate, in addition to all the common evils of native ignorance. COMPARISON OF RESULTS IN GOVERNMENT AND AIDED COLLEGES. But is the large amount expended on the higher education better devoted to the Government colleges than the aided colleges ? We frankly admit that at present the Government col- leges generally show better results in the way of intellectual teaching—a greater number of students attaining the higher degrees in art and science than in the aided colleges. This is easily accounted for. The fact of their being Government institutions gives them social and political advantages in the eyes of a people like the Hindus, of which an independent Saxon can form no idea. And when we add the hope of a lucrative appointment, and the honour of Government employment, the wonder is that any colleges can compete with theirs; and yet we have the fact before us that, at the present time, the Free Church College in Madras and the Established Church College in Calcutta are more popular with the natives, and are attended by a larger number of students than those of the Government in these cities. In the Madras returns for 1877 there are 220 students in the Free Church and only 150 in the Government college, 32 and in the General Assembly College, Calcutta, for the same year the numbers were 317, the largest number in any one college in India. It is also worthy of remark that whilst the wealthier part of the population, who are able and willing to pay for education, attend in larger numbers the Government col- leges, there is very little difference in the caste and social status of those attending the different colleges. In the Report for 1870 we have the following important Tables, showing the social position of the parents of the pupils attending Government and aided colleges. For Calcutta :— SocraAL POSITION OF THE PARENTS. Percentage on Total of Pupils. | 1 Zemindars,| Merchants, awk Gov Talookdars,| Bankers, | Profes- and Persons} Banians, sional ions: Past: Others. of Indepen- and Persons. menees i te dentIncome.} Brokers. y ‘6 O16 2) O18 9 a ee ‘A | 11:2 | 23:2 | 14 | 23-2 Govt. Colleges, 3 Private Colleges, | 2 0°6 8 6°6 14 For Madras it was :— SocraL POSITION OF PARENTS. Percentage of Students. Zemindars, | Merchants, Gort Talookdars,} Bankers, | Profes- Sc necanin 1 athe and Persons| Banians, sional anil Panel kes 04 Others. of Indepen- and Persons. pre es esis dentIncome.} Brokers. Govt. Colleges, 28:0 90 | 15:4 | 28°6 Private Colleges,| 25:0 13°3 On these Tables the Under-Secretary of Government re- marks: ‘‘ As far, therefore, as this classification can be depended upon, it would appear that there is no great differ- ence in social position between the students attending Government and private colleges. And this is probably the case, but the more wealthy members of each class frequent 33 the Government colleges, while the poorer students resort to the aided colleges.” This popularity prevails in spite of the attraction of Government patronage and the supposed disadvantage of religious teaching. Let Government withdraw from the unfair and unhealthy Time to competition in direct education, as in 1854 it promised “4” to do while maintaining its universities, and soon, under the stimulus of the universities and the grant-in-aid, the natives of India, the European residents, and missionary societies, will keep up an educational system fully equal to the wants of the country, and far better fitted for training the moral and religious, as well as the intellectual, nature of the young; while it would call forth a spirit of liberality which is suppressed, and of independence which is crushed, by the present system. The Government colleges, we may admit, did good at first, in stimulating a desire for higher education, when that was needed. But now that a keen appetite is created and intellectual tastes are so highly cultivated, they may, as these reports to Government show, be advantageously withdrawn. Many of the more intelligent members of the Government, both at home and in India, admit this, and we believe steps would have been taken in this direction long ago, but for the strong prejudices of some influential men of the old school, who still distrust the natives and the missionaries, and what is perhaps more difficult to be got rid of, the strong, vested interests of the large body of professors— | men who can by their social position and fluent pen influence - society both abroad and at home. The grant-in-aid system has been called‘bya high authority, the pivot of the educational system. When there is, as at present, a loud call for retrenchment, and a louder call for the extension of elementary education, the advantages of substituting the grant-in-aid for the Government education is apparent by a reference to the comparative cost of the two systems, The significance of the tables in the Parliamentary re- ports cannot be mistaken. They call attention to the fact that for the year 1868 the cost to the Imperial Treasury Cc A comparison of Government expenditure on education and on other objects. o4 for each pupil in the Government College in Calcutta was 255 rupees; in Patna College, it was as high as 748 rupees ; while in the following aided colleges it was— London Missionary Society College, . 109 rupees. Cathedral College, . : 4 Os). 68, General Assembly’s Canteee. , 43/4, Free Church College, feats § ieee. : In the Bombay Presidency, 108 who matriculated at the Government colleges cost 493 rupees each for the year, while 23 who matriculated in private colleges cost them nothing. In the entire Presidency of Bengal, 701 students on the roll of all the Government colleges cost the Imperial Treasury 226 rupees each for eleven months’ instruction, while 825 on the roll of aided colleges only cost the Trea- sury 67 rupees each for the same period. If we put down to the spread of general education among the poor a fair proportion of the sum spent on directors and inspectors, and the entire sum expended on normal schools for training teachers, and on schools for the lower and middle class, it cannot amount to more than about £200,000; and this is all, with the exception of about £100,000 for grants-in-aid, that is done for carrying out the chief design of the despatch, which was to inaugurate such great things for the education of India. Take even the entire sum of £730,000 devoted to edu- cation, and what is that for such an important work in such a country, and under a paternal Government? Compare it with the immense expenditure from the Imperial Treasury for other objects. From the returns for 1877-78, we find - that the ordinary expenditure was £51,430,673, and includ- ing that on ‘Productive Public Works,” in which class education might be more accurately put than many of the public works, and working expenses of railways and canals, it was £58,178,563. Of this sum, £15,792,112 was spent on the Army, £2,158,032 on Police, £3,519,668 on ordinary public works, £3,275,821 on law and justice, more than £7,000,000 on the ‘collection of revenue,” and only £730,013 on the entire education of about 200,000,000 of a population, sunk in the grossest ignor- 35 ance and immorality and superstition; and of that, not more than about £300,000 on the most needy class. Why, the Government spent that same year £443,776 on ‘stationery and printing.” Since the above was written, I am favoured with’ a copy Official Report of the “General Report of Public Instruction in Bengal jgg™2* for 1877-78,” and from it give the following Table. The report is a very able and interesting one, by the Director of Public Instruction, A. W. Croft, Esq., and manifests an enlightened interest in the spread of education among all classes. The methods used for bringing instruction down to the lower classes seem earnest and successful, but obviously need large increased grants of money, and more agents for ex- tending the organisation to the wants of the people. It will be seen that the cost of Government graduates has increased, while that of those im aided colleges is less than formerly. Statement of Number of Students attending Government and Aided Colleges in Bengal, the Number of Candidates for First Arts ELxamination, and the Number passed, with the Cost of each College and each Student to the State. ; Number of Number of Received | Hach Stu- General Colleges, Students on | from State | dent cost vetoes ee Roll, Funds. State. peal Government— Rupees. Rupees. Presidency Golleses 329 59,499 2124 73 31 Sangcrit, . . 36 14,356 495 6 2 Hooghly, i a ecg 208 32,543 230 49 19 3. MPPPBCOCR Ss. 129 22,622 2264 69 14 fours Krishnagur,. . . 105 18,380 2354 16 3 . 1A Berhampore,. . . 39 14,840 479 13 6 (SE a rr ae 108 32,381 450 51 2 euLeack) 2 39 #5,367 854 9 5 Rajshahye, . . . 41 a be3 INT a Midnapore, . . . 1, 544 54 5 1 Chittagong, . . . 15 1888 236 ae oA Rungpore, .. . 16 2073 172 ' Total, . . 1082 214,533 2704 301 94 Aided— beajllt ae ke WE eae petal St. Xavier’s,, . . 105 3600 53 12 8 4g © Free Church, . . 99 5520 754 33 13 ez Established Church, 333 4200 24 54 15 2F4 Cathedral Mission, 86 5520 76 30 9 roe Doveton, . . ; 18 3000 273 3 1 eA London Mission, . 60 2296 | 56 20 10 Sabmgk : Tatake.s te: 701 24,136 | 55 152 56 Economy of grants-in-aid, 36 The Director calls attention to the fact, that ‘For the first time in its history, or in that of any aided college, the number of students in the General Assembly’s Institution exceeds that of the Presidency College.” I would add that it is also worthy of remark that while each pupil in the Presidency College costs the Government 2123 rupees, those of the General Assembly’s College cost only twenty-four rupees each. While if we take all the Government colleges in Bengal, the cost per student is 2704 rupees, and that of the aided colleges is only fifty-five rupees. ' With all their disadvantages, it appears that in Bengal they An Under-Sec- retary’s view. yield 152 candidates for the first Arts examination against 301 from Government colleges, and fifty-six of the former pass for ninety-four of the latter; a strong proof of the economy of the grant-in-aid system, and if the system were more generously and fairly encouraged, it would soon prove its efficiency, and the wisdom of the Home Government in recommending its substitution for direct Government instruc- tion in the higher department of education. There are no official returns for the other Presidencies, but from authentic sources I am able to state that the number of students attending the Government College in Madras in 1877 was only 150, while the number in the Free Church College was 220, while the cost of the former was four times that of the latter. So that mission colleges are now more popular when fairly tried than those of Government in both these seats of education. We close this part of our subject in the words of one intimately acquainted with the working of the educational system. Mr. A. P. Howell, formerly Under-Secretary to the Home Department in India, in a report laid before both Houses of Parliament in 1870, calls attention to the 62nd clause of the Education Despatch, and recommends its application (p. 8), and adds (p. 51): “It seems, there- fore, quite open to doubt whether the direct patronage of the State flows most in the channel where there is the greatest need for it, and whether the expenditure on the higher Government institutions might not gradually but largely be withdrawn, and the funds be utilised in the extension and improvement of the lower institutions.” He 37 then quotes a long passage from the Report of the inspector of the south-west division favourable to the encouragement of voluntary and mission schools. Again and again, in that important document laid before Parliament, with all the sanction and authority of the Council on Education in India, is attention called to the importance of carrying out the recommendation of the 62nd section of the despatch of 1854. In one passage he says: “The obvious infer- ence is that if Government wishes to restrict itself to its | proper province, and to promote higher education by the | grant-in-aid system, it must retire from direct competition | with at.” RELIGIOUS NEUTRALITY AN IMPORTANT FEATURE OF THE DESPATCH OF 1854. That the Home Government meant their education scheme to be thoroughly impartial in its treatment of all forms of religion is too obvious to need any demonstration. I am not aware of any one in this country having questioned this feature of the Government policy. It is too ostenta- tiously proclaimed to be questioned by any one who knows and trusts in the honesty of English statesmen ; it is only doubted by suspicious Asiatics, who, the more it is asserted, only doubt it the more. But wherein does neutrality consist? Does it mean that Neutrality by the Government will not in any way interfere with the pbbsea te religious beliefs of the natives of India, then I unhesitatingly ile. maintain that in the matter of direct teaching in the higher departments, the principle of neutrality is violated in the most practical and important manner. It is true the Government professors do not directly attack the heathen systems of religion in class hours, nor do they teach Christianity. But they do what is far worse, they under- 1 undermines mine the religion of the Hindus, and offer no substitute in nativerell: its place. I admit it is not intentional, but is not the less true and effectual. It is impossible to teach European science and literature without destroying belief in the gods and religions of India. I will not waste time in showing how it is that such is the effect. It is well known that their 38 false religions are so interwoven with the most erroneous systems of geography, history, astronomy, and science, that the mere teaching of the truth in these departments of a Uproots belief. higher education necessarily destroys religious belief. No man who knows India can doubt this. To say that the effect is the same as the teaching of true science in Christian countries is gross misrepresentation. None but a man who is ignorant of India or a sceptic in religion could assert it.* But let me call a few out of many witnesses to the fact. T.B.Macaulay. So long ago as 18338 Macaulay wrote as follows :—“ No Hindu, who has received an English education, ever remains sincerely attached to his religion. Some continue to profess it as a matter of policy; but many profess themselves pure Deists, and some embrace Christianity.” t Dr.M.Mitchell. Dr. Murray Mitchell, so long a distinguished missionary and educationist in India, said at a mission conference in Mildmay Hall last year: ‘In colleges the gulf between Hinduism and European thought yawns wide and fathom- less. Hinduism teaches a professedly inspired science which is outrageously absurd. The pupil soon rejects it with con- tempt, and at the same time necessarily rejects also the authority of the book which inculcates it. There is thus to him no divine revelation; no authoritative declaration of spiritual truth. For an individual or a community to be Unsettles thus suddenly tossed from superstition into scepticism is moral prin- ciples. : ; if the mental balance is destroyed and the moral nature toften completely wrecked.” Government He then speaks of the effect of the character and profession appointment of ‘ ; er professors. Of the teachers in the Government colleges, ‘“ In appointing professors, Government seems to have a regard only to intel- lectual qualifications. In religion, a man may be a Christ- ian, Deist, Atheist, Comtist, or Agnostic; the Government serenely ignores the question both of his creed and character.” He admits that there are Christian men among them, but quotes authority for saying that there are also among them distinguished men who have “diffused the principles of Tom Paine over a whole generation of youth.” oe Oa The Rev. W. Fleming Stevenson, lately returned from his * See Appendix E, + Life of Lord Macaulay.” surely a transition most perilous and painful. No wonder — og mission of inquiry in the Kast, told the last General Assembly in Iveland that a native who observed to him “those of us who learn English do not believe in idols,” expressed the general mind of his class. He adds: ‘The head of.a native college said one day, ‘I believe that every one of our students who Rees: us, knowing English, has ceased to believe in popular Hinduism.’ ” How many educated young men be- lieve in the Shastras? was the question recently addressed to the students in a Calcutta college. Promptly there were two answers—‘ Not one in a hundred,” and ‘“‘ Not one in a thousand,” and the rest assented. And the Under-Secretary of Government in India, in a report to the Home Govern- ment, puts it in the mildest form when he says: ‘ And what is the product which it costs the State so much to produce? The Bengali undergraduate has had a fair vernacular educa- tion, and has gained at least a superficial knowledge of English, but he is possibly, I may say probably, if from a Government school, without any religious belief at all.” We might multiply such evidence, but it is unnecessary. It is in vain to call such a system neutral, it systematically This not undermines all religious belief, and leaves the youth of India ™°™™!y: at the most critical period of their lives in a condition most dangerous and disadvantageous to the formation of moral principles and habits. The Under-Secretary in a report to the Indian Government, Testimony of speaking of the effect of introducing European science, &c., SanGier ot says: “ Every day opened to the student a succession of new Government. and strange phenomena in the unsealed realm of history, science, ol philosophy. They were suddenly thrown adrift Unsettles from the mooring and anchorages of old creeds, and tossed ar upon the wide sea of speculation and extravagance. “Tt was no wonder that moral and social obligations began and sense of to share the fate of religious beliefs, and that the whole com- 0" °Pus* munity was in alarm at the spread of the new views. This was precisely the state of things which Mr. Charles Marsh had so eloquently anticipated during the discussion of the charter in 1813. ‘It is one thing,’ he said, ‘to dispel the charm which binds mankind to established habits and ancient obligations, and another to turn them over to the discipline and the authority of new doctrines. In that dreadful His testimony to missionary influence. Moral and social prin- ciples sub- verted, Dr. C. Macnamara. 40 interval—that dreary void, when the mind is left to wander and grope its way without the props that have hitherto supported it, or the lights which have guided it-—what are the chances that they will discern the beauties or submit to the restraints of the religion you may propose to give them ?’ That ‘dreadful interval,’” the Under-Secretary goes on to say, “and ‘that dreary void’ had now arrived, and 7 is impossible to say how far native society might not have been disorganised, HAD NOT THE MISSIONARIES STEPPED IN AND SUPPLIED A NEW DIRECTION TO THE AWAKENING SCEPTICISM AND A FRESH SUBJECT TO ATTRACT THE NEW AROUSED SPIRIT OF SPECULATION.” A most important testimony from a high official of great knowledge and experience reporting to the Government. In regard to the moral influence of the teaching in the colleges where no religion is taught, it may be admitted that the educated natives, from contact with English pro- fessors of high character and position, are influenced by a feeling of honour to pay more regard to truth and honesty than the uneducated. But, on the other hand, it is indisputable that they have acquired not a few new vices or aggravated old ones. They have far less regard to the authority of parents or superiors, and they are more supercilious and contemptuous in the treatment of their more ignorant brethren. The marriage tie is less regarded, and they are more addicted to luxurious habits, and the new vice of drunkenness is making alarming inroads on the physical condition and social habits of the educated youth of India. The Report to Parliament of 1870 seems to us frequently to indicate what it would have been unwise in such a docu- ment to express, that the results in this respect are not satisfactory. It is a subject on which we cannot get docu- mentary or official evidence, but, from all we can learn, the following sad picture of society in Bengal could be substan- tiated by overwhelming moral evidence. It was spoken publicly at the opening of the session of the Medical School of Westminster Hospital last October by Dr. C. Macnamara, and, from his long and extensive practice, to a large extent amongst the highest class of the native, few men have had such opportunities of knowing their habits and sentiments. Al He said: “ Many natives admit the benefits conferred by our rule, but they deplore the disorganised state of society in Bengal. The old families have almost disappeared, and the sons and husbands of the educated and rising generation are largely addicted to drunkenness and vice of every kind, and the more thoughtful men and the vast majority of women contrast this state of things with times when there was less security to life and property, less law, taxation, and educa- tion, but when the greatest slur that could attach itself to a man’s name was that of being an undutiful son. Our system of education has broken down all faith in religion, and the outcome of a purely secular training has developed gross materialism and rank socialism, and so the necessity for suppressing the outspoken sentiments of the vernacular press, which, nevertheless, gave utterance to opinions he had heard over and over again for some years past among all classes of natives, and which he dreaded would one day break out into a revolt, in comparison with which the Mutiny was a © mere brawl.” Where, then, I ask, is the neutrality of our present method ? But what was the design of the Home Government in the despatch of 1854? It aimed at neutrality, as we shall show, in a most enlightened and effective way. UNIVERSITIES, GRANTS-IN-AID, AND INSPECTION WERE THE MEANS BY WHICH A NEUTRAL SYSTEM IN THE HIGHER EDUCATION OF INDIA COULD ALONE BE CARRIED OUT. I have shown how decidedly the Home Government expressed its desire for the withdrawal of the direct teaching in the higher departments, and that the universities were meant to supersede the necessity for it. I do not assert that it was wholly, or chiefly,—it was, perhaps, not at all on the ground of their not being incon- sistent with neutrality that they were to be withdrawn. It would have been questionable policy to have declared that they were practically incompatible with neutrality. But it is a most significant fact, that all the references to neutrality that I can see in the despatch, are in connection with the three new features which it introduced into the education Neutrality of despatch. Refers to con- ferring univer- sity degrees on special subjects Not carried out. 42 of India — viz., The “ Universities Grants-in-Aid,” and — “ Inspection.” To secure impartiality in quotations, I shall give those collected by a strong advocate of the present system. Mr, Cust says in his pamphlet on this subject :— “Thave carefully gone over these famous one hundred paragraphs, though I have often read them before. If there is any one leading characteristic of that charter, it is the desire not to awaken a religious difficulty. Thus :— “Par, 28, ‘The examination at the University will not include any subject connected with religious belief, and the affiliated institutions will be under the management of persons of every variety of religious persuasion,’ “Par, 32. ‘We shall refuse to sanction any teaching (connected with Hindu and Mohammedan tenets), as directly opposed to the principle of religious neutrality, to which we have always adhered.’ “Par. 34. ‘(The Senate) will include natives of India of all religious persuasions.’ “ Par. 53, ‘The system of grants-in-aid will be based on an entire abstinence from interference with the religious instruction con- veyed in the school.’ “Par. 56. ‘No notice whatsoever to be taken by the Inspector of the religious doctrines, which may be taught in the school.’ “Par, 57. ‘It may be advisable distinctly to assert in them the principle of perfect religious neutrality, on which the grants will be awarded.’” If the system thus laid down had been faithfully and impartially carried out there would have been nothing to complain of, Mr. Robert N. Cust, and Mr. M. Kempson, who have lately written pampblets in support of the higher education by Government, and in opposition to the recent circular of the Church Missionary Society, and the views I had advocated at the Conference on Missions in October last, both maintain, that the principles of the despatch have been carried out. The former quotes a number of passages from resolutions and declarations by the Government in India. But these gentlemen should distinguish between good resolutions and good deeds. I never questioned the designs and intentions of the Government, or its members. I have always made 43 full allowance for the difficulties of their position. I do not even impute motives to the parties most interested in sup- porting the present system, I give them full credit for thinking the system of which they are the representatives or agents the best that could be carried out. But we cannot blind our eyes to facts, and it is with facts that I deal, not words. It is very difficult for any class of men Systems dread to see their own faults, or the faults of their systems, and ema, it is for that reason I urge action from without. It is hardly to be expected that the system will perform the rite which Japanese officials ironically call the “ happy despatch.” ‘‘ Kuthanasia,” a most sweet word, is not likely to become popular among systems any more than amongst individuals; nor is it désirable. A responsible Government must take the work in hand. Mr. Kempson tells us, with- Mr. Kempson’s out the slightest reference to any evidence, that in regard “7 to my charges against the tendency of the present system, “They have no existence in fact, so far as my experience goes.” If Mr. Kempson’s experience was limited to the north-west provinces, in which he was “ Director of Public Instruction,” I can conceive it possible that he may not have seen, in an obvious form, the evils I speak of, for two reasons. First, because these provinces have been only a 0 Mestnn ts os : : : earning the comparatively short time under the system, which takes worst results. time to produce its baneful fruit. In a list of the pro- fessed religious beliefs of graduates over all India, I was struck with the fact, that of the number of those who pro- fessed themselves of no religious belief, the proportion was far greatest in Bengal, where the system had been longest in force, and it almost vanished as we came to these regions in which it was comparatively new. Second, the north-west provinces and the Punjab have Good rulers. been highly favoured with commissioners and lieutenant governors of the very highest wisdom and character, who did much to put education on the best possible basis in their power. JDisloyalty and open irreligion and immorality, under such men as Sir Henry Lawrence, Lord Lawrence, and Sir William Muir, would have been unnatural and improbable.* * There is a third reason, but as it assumes the form of personality I will not introduce it into my argument. Mr. Kempson seems to form very decided Grants-in-aid for all, Natives could support colleges. Testimony of witnesses. Evidence recent and remote, 44 Second misconception. Both Mr. Kempson and Mr. Cust assume, that in advocating the withdrawal of the Govern- ment colleges we expect that the grants-in-aid are to go exclusively, or almost exclusively, to mission colleges, and against this their arguments on the ground of neutrality are telling enough. But it is an easy feat to knock down a man of straw of our own setting up. I would at once say that such a procedure would be not only opposed to neutrality but to justice. The natives of India have a right to be fairly and even liberally dealt with in such a case; and I fully expect that they would set themselves to establish and maintain colleges and high schools, if they were left to stand alone, instead of being bolstered up by a pauperising system. They have done so before, and would do it again. When the desire for education had not a tithe of the strength it has now, the natives of India made noble contributions for education. Now it is a felt necessity, and there is no fear of the higher education going down. If the universities are kept up, they will maintain the standard in all the higher schools and colleges. That the natives of India are able, and would, if left to their own resources, maintain the colleges, is asserted in Government reports. Mr. Arthur Howell, than whom no man had better means of knowing, asserts it ; the conference of missionaries at Allahabad expressed the same opinion and in the last “statement exhibiting the moral and material progress of India,” attention is called to the circumstance that on the occasion of the visit of the Prince of Wales, the wealthy natives in several places commemorated the event by raising money for educational purposes. The native gentlemen of Behar alone subscribed the sum of £20,000. We have had noble examples of liberality among the natives of India in both building and endowing colleges and opinions on very slender data. He had.only seen a brief and necessarily an imperfect account of my views in a pamphlet by Mr. Cust, who did not even quote my words ; and yet, with no other means of knowing my character or opinions, he pens and prints the following words: ‘‘It need hardly be said that want of sympathy leads to detraction and antagonism.” Then follow such expressions as ‘‘ unfair and mischievous,” “imperfect information,” ‘‘ a libel on. the people of India,” &c. On what ground does Mr. Kempson charge me with ‘‘want of sympathy’ with the Government, and guilty of ‘‘ detraction’”’ and ‘* libel” and ‘‘ mischievous respresentations ” of the people of India ? 45 schools before Government began to do it for them. We are apt to forget that learning was honoured and maintained in India long before we had emerged from barbarism. We do not expect them to volunteer to do this ; like most Willnotvolun- ; teer till left subjects of an absolute government, they prefer to have every- ajone. thing done for them. But if left alone in a firm, cautious, and friendly spirit, they could and would provide it for themselves. But would this be an advantage in a missionary point of Benefit to view? ‘That is not with me the first question. Is it right eae aections in itself? That is what we have to see to; and if it is right, I am sure it will be best for the righteous cause. Missions have nothing to fear in a fair competition with natives of any class. It is only the unfair competition with a Government, backed by the prestige and pay that makes voluntary efforts by either natives or missions so arduous or impossible. If that competition were withdrawn, we have Fair com- : petition reason to believe that colleges would soon cease to be a not feared. burden on the funds of the Church. They would, with slightly higher fees and a larger attendance, pay their own expenses. The average attendance at aided colleges is only seventy-four; they could educate three or four times that number without any corresponding addition to their con- tributions from home. If any should still say that the natives of India could not or would not support colleges for themselves, I would only say, that in that improbable and sad case they would have themselves to blame, and could not charge on Government the fault of aiding either mis- slonary societies or European residents in providing the needed means of education. It is found in Calcutta, that the high schools are now paying concerns, to use a mercantile phrase, and they are being established as a profitable commercial speculation. We have another and painful reason for urging the gradual withdrawal of the direct teaching by Government in the higher departments. THE PRESENT SYSTEM IS RAISING UP A NUMBER OF DISCONTENTED AND DISLOYAL SUBJECTS. This is not so much felt in districts in which education is of recent origin and limited in extent to the wants of the Ee Expectations raised, to be dis- appointed, 46 locality. But in the old educational seats, especially in Bengal, this result of the Government system of direct education is painfully and alarmingly felt. It fosters and gives facilities for getting an education in the language and culture of the ruling power, which is generally interpreted into an intention to employing in lucrative and honourable posts those who have entered, as they think, with their Asiatic notions, into relations with the Government, in which their only sense of gratitude for the benefits of a cheap and liberal education is a “ lively anticipation of future favours,” and a sense of injustice and a feeling of resentment if they are not conferred. The in- terpretation put on the despatch of 1854 has added to that native tendency to anticipate Government patronage for the favour they think they confer by attending its colleges. The wording of sec. 72 seems to have been so understood. It runs thus: “ We have always been of opinion that the spread of education in India will produce a greater efficiency in all branches of administration, by enabling you to obtain the services of intelligent and trustworthy persons in every department of Government; and, on the other hand, we believe that the numerous vacancies of different kinds which have constantly to be filled up may afford a great stimulus to education.” They could then say, as they do in sec. 73: “ We understand that it is often not so much the want of Government employment, as the want of properly quali- fied persons to be employed by Government, which is felt at the present time in many parts of India.” They express regret that “no more than forty-six persons had been gazetted in Bengal up to 1852, all of whom were students in the Government colleges.” Other passages might be quoted to the same effect. These are worthy objects in themselves, but they have engendered un- reasonable expectations in the minds of a people like the Hindus. But what is the state of matters now? A supply vastly in excess of the demand, not only from Government offices, but from all sources of employment. In the Report for 1870, the Under-Secretary makes frequent reference to this AT / ree j fact. The following may be taken as a sample of the views repeatedly expressed or implied in the ‘Blue Book.” Re- ye ferring to the educated native, he says: “He is precluded .,.,., by his education from manual labour, and from recruiting that class on whose industry and intelligence the prosperity ‘jy: of the country depends. He finds himself in keenest com- , — petition for intellectual employment—for there are thousands / like himself—as the market, though ample, has been over- * stocked, and all the while industrial education has been neglected altogether, and there are millions for whom no isa of instruction has been provided by the Government at all.” This will easily be understood by a reference to the Supply in numbers who are prepared for, or who actually pass Bae) through the colleges now, as compared with what they were 21 years ago, when the three universities were set up. In 1857 when the universities were founded, the matriculation examination only is given. In Calcutta, there were 244 candidates, of whom 162 passed. In 1877, there were 2425 candidates, of whom 1355 passed. In Madras, the number for 1857 was 41 candidates, of whom 36 passed; in 1877 there were 2517 candidates, of whom 1250 passed. It will give an idea of the increase of educa- tion, when we quote from the “ Abstract,” laid before Parlia- ment last year, the following figures. In ten years, from 1868 to 1877, the three universities conferred the following degrees :— 286 received the degree of M.A. 1,652 F. 4 B.A. 209 received diplomas in civil engineering. 8309 iS » in medicine. 910 es vp, inlaws 4,091 passed the first arts examination. 17,802 ¥ entrance examination. Add 5,948 who passed the entrance examination from 1857-1867, and we have 23,740 matriculated within these 21 years. The rapid rate of progress may be judged of by taking 48 the numbers who passed each fifth year during this period. In 1857, 198 passed the entrance examination in Calcutta and Madras universities; that for Bom- bay was not then formed. ‘peeps! Bao te OON86T AVS3 vi the three universities. > 1872, 1486 ” bP] 9) 3) >) 1877, 2808 PP) ” bP) >? > Well may we ask with the Under-Secretary in the “ Return’ from which these figures are taken: “Does the system tend to confer those vast moral and material blessings which flow from the general diffusion of useful knowledge ?” described in the despatch of 1854. What becomes ‘“ What becomes of all these highly-educated young men, re’ ~~ whom the university turns out every year? Are they, as in England, absorbed into the channels of every-day life, with a satisfactory or even perceptible result? Are they to be traced, as in England, in a liberal and enlightened native press? Do native gentlemen, like English gentle- men, return to their zemindaries from a university career to spread around them the reflex of the enlightenment they have received themselves? Does the process of highly educating a few and leaving the masses, tend to increase or diminish the gulf between class and class? Are there any indications of a decrease in crime, or of a dawn of intel- ligence in the agricultural classes? Such questions will occur to any one who sees how the public expenditure on education is annually distributed, and how comparatively few are the recipients of the larger share of the State’s bounty.” Native press He professes his inability to answer these questions. It controlled. 2 ete . is time they were answered. Recent events have given an unsatisfactory reply; our attempt to control the native press is the most significant answer that Government has yet given. Will that satisfy the nation and the Church ? The above figures give no idea of the number of educated natives qualified for, as they think, and fully expecting employment in Government or mercantile offices, and in a 49 large proportion of cases finding none of the kind they expected ; while, by their training, they are, as Mr. Howell says, “ unfitted for manual and productive industry.” In the official Report on the “ Moral and Material Pro- gress of India,” laid before Parliament last year, the expres- sion occurs regarding the educated class—‘‘ The complaint is reiterated by the local Government, that the youth of Bengal resort almost exclusively to: two professions, which are over-stocked—the law and the public service... Dislike of manual work creates a prejudice against (even) the practical study of mechanics.” If we look beyond those who have succeeded in passing Indian not ‘ ; ‘ me IRE like English the entrance examination, or in obtaining degrees, to the graduates. much larger number who have come up as candidates from the higher schools, with a good education in their own languages, and a fair knowledge of English, acquired not for its own sake, or for the sake of the literary treasures it contains, but solely with a view to sordid gain or worldly promotion, we shall have a better idea of the source whence so much discontent and disloyalty emanate. The number of candidates who have presented themselves for examination by the universities, durmg these twenty-one years, amounts in the aggregate to not less than 61,650. To show the rate of increase, we find, that for the first eleven years the number of applicants was 15,673. In the last ten years it was 45,977. The ‘General Report on Public Instruction in Bengal,” just come to hand, states, that “ the number has doubled since 1874.” These numbers, though Only too large, are not, it may be said, great, when compared with Peale. the population of India. But they are out of all proportion to the numbers educated in the lower departments, and what is of far more consequence, far above the natural law of demand and supply. No comparison can be drawn from European habits, where the higher education is part of the equipment for the life of a gentleman, as well as a qualifi- cation for professional employment. To the Indian this Kuropean culture is almost exclusively a preparation for professional, and still more for official, life, and disappointed of these, the education has only excited wants and raised expectations which leave the unsuccessful aspirant a discon- D L€te bf hen Wy, “Pe e f Th hvx44 or A solemn offi- cial warning. Government is responsible, 50 tented and dangerous man. These figures speak for them- selves. The Under-Secretary of the Home Department in India, was painfully impressed with the state of matters of which he knew so much, and in 1869 wrote these eloquent and solemn words in his “Report”—-words which may well go home to every patriotic heart. The danger is far greater now than it was ten years ago. It grows with the growth of the system: ‘‘ Looking to the rapid growth of our educational system, and to the enormous influence for good or evil that a single able and well-educated man may exercise in this country; and looking at the dense but inflammable ignorance of the millions around us, it seems a tremendous experiment for the State to under- take, and in some provinces almost monopolise, the direct training of whole generations, above their own creed, and above the sense of relation to . another world uj upon which they base all their moral obligations ; and the possible evil is obviously growing with this system;” and he concludes with the solemn warning : “ It is true that things go smoothly and quietly, but this is attained by ignoring, not only the inevitable results of early training on the character, and the great needs of human nature, especially in the East, but by also ignoring the responsibility which devolves on the Government that assumes the entire control of direct educa- tion at all. If, therefore, while fanaticism is raging around, there is a calm in our schools and colleges, it is an ominous and unnatural calm of impossible continuance, the calm of the centre of the cyclone.” Aspout REMEDIES AND OBJECTIONS.—FIRST, GOVERNMENT INSTITUTIONS. I do not feel called on to lay down the programme of a future policy; that I leave for more experienced and compe- tent hands. I have proved the existence of an evil of a most pernicious and perilous kind, which demands a remedy on the score of religion, morality, and good government. I have shown the presence of institutions supported by natives and European residents, as well as those by missionary 51 societies, capable of indefinite expansion, with a continuance of the grants-in-aid now given. I have called attention to the principle underlying the whole of the despatch of 1854, which anticipated and required a change from the existing method of direct instruction by the Government. The uni- versities, the grants-in-aid, and inspection being all based on that principle. In these circumstances, I am under no Firm, cautious, necessity of proposing any new method, I simply ask for the "492%, |. honest and earnest carrying out of the provision of the de- Gevemment spatch.* It will be a difficult, but not an impossible task. ~ ” It must be done firmly and persistently, but slowly and cautiously, under imperial authority: not in a spirit of antagonism to the natives, but by appealing to their better feelings, and calling on them to make a sacrifice for the benefit of their poorer and less-favoured brethren. I have too much respect for the higher classes in India, to suspect them of the selfish desire to continue a monopoly of State education at the expense of the poor. With special colleges, and the technical schools, and normal schools and colleges, we would not interfere. The education in the higher class of schools should also and higher- be given up by the Government. In them the branches “**™ taught necessarily tend to undermine belief, as well as, though not to the same extent as in the colleges, and it would be easy for the natives and societies to keep them up. They can be made even now to pay their own expenses under native teachers, with a good European master. The universities would of course remain, and would be a guarantee, and the means of keeping up the standard, and stimulat- ing to the highest effort by their examinations, degrees, scholarships, and rewards. They might be improved by broadening the basis of representation at their boards. These are what we ask, and they are only what the Home What Home Government have urged for the last quarter of a century. abelan But if ‘it’s a far cry to Loch Awe,’ it’s a further cry to the "™ Hooghly, and it will require the loudest and most stern call of the British Parliament, to secure a consistent carrying out of its determinations. * See the first sentence in the analysis of the despatch by the Under-Secre- tary, Appendix D. Why in vain. Government preoccupied. External influence, of a, profes- sional class. Mission col- leges disliked. 52 But it may be asked, since the terms of the despatch are so explicit, and the wishes of Government have been so clearlyand frequently expressed during these twenty-fiveyears, why have not Government colleges been reduced in number, and the funds employed on lower education, or the cheap sub- stitution for grants-in-aid in native and mission colleges ? The answer is not far to seek. The Indian Government cannot give, or does not give, that amount of time and attention to education which the subject demands. They are so much taken up with weighty and multifarious affairs of a more urgent, though not more important nature, that they have left the power, not formally, but practically, in the hands of secular educationists. They have thrown open the highest appointments, even those of ‘“ Directors of Public Instruction,” which at first were given to experienced civilians, to professors and principals of colleges and schools, as the rewards of lengthened service, or of ability in teaching. The consequences are what might have been expected. With the best intention, it may be, these men inevitably identify themselves with their system, which had been all along the higher education. They think, and in fact tell us, that we must educate the higher classes to the highest pitch, and by-and-by education will “ percolate downward to the lower strata.’ We all know the tendency of professional and class. legislation. T'o set a body of ecclesiastics or schoolmasters, of doctors or lawyers, of officers of the army or navy, to take: steps for gradually reducing their numbers, until they become extinct, and to foster and strengthen another body of men for whom they had no affection, and in whom, from professional pride, they had probably no confidence, to take their place, would not be a likely way to gain the end desired. They would find a thousand good reasons for avoiding the task, or delaying its execution. In fact, to ask men to extinguish themselves or their system is wrong, to expect them to do it is folly. But I must call attention to what is worse than evasion and delay in carrying out the provisions of the despatch and the wishes of the Government. There seems of late, a growing tendency to discourage, if not to destroy, the aided colleges, as rivals to those of Government. 53 It is with pain that I have lately received stronger con- firmation of what has long been feared, that there is a strong desire to get rid of all our missionary colleges, which have done ~ so much for the education of the people, and, as the highest | officers of the Government have allowed, done much to save _ society from the baneful effects of mere secular teaching. Some of these colleges have of late years greatly improved in their management and efficiency, and now number a larger roll of graduates than those of Government. This is what the despatch aimed at, and what ought to have been hailed with gratitude. Instead of that, what do we find ? The most efficient of them are being treated with the greatest severity, and the grants-in-aid are reduced, and reduced in the most arbitrary way, and on such short notice as to be embarrassing and discouraging to the managers. I cannot now give details, but record the fact, and am_pre- pared with details if required. It has long been known that many in high employment in the Educational Department are opposed to mission colleges, on the ground of religious feeling. They openly advocate views directly adverse to Christianity; and this feeling, which formerly found vent in contempt for a weak opponent, now finds vent in acts of bitter hostility towards a powerful rival. JI am far from charging professors and directors as a body with hostility to religion, but it can- not be denied that there are many of the most active and pushing of their number who are opposed to anything in Discouraged. Hostility of Secularists. the form of living Christianity, and in a system which is — based on the exclusion of religion those who are hostile to it have a vantage ground, in opposing institutions which condemn their own by teaching the truths which they ignore, and yet gain the confidence of the natives, and do their work at so much less cost to the Government.* I need not reply to the objections which may be made to these simple proposals. I would refer to the able men who drew up the despatch, as a guarantee that its provisions are wise and practicable. It is well known that Sir Charles Wood took counsel with the wisest and most experienced men of all parties, in preparing that important document-— * Cannot plead retrenchment. They are increasing cost of Government colleges. Do not reply to objections, Experienced . men drew up despatch. Call for co- operation. In place . division of labour. Waste in men and money. 54 the Magna Charta of education in India. The most ex- perienced governors, civilians, professors, and missionaries were engaged in its composition, and it bears the mark of the greatest wisdom and minutest forethought, “aided,” as they say they were in paragraph six, “ by ample experience of the past and the most competent advice for the future.” It is not disrespectful to say of those who have carped at, and opposed the carrying out of its provisions, that they cannot boast of greater wisdom and experience than those who gave such mature and disinterested attention to the drawing up of a code worthy of the new era, when, as they say, in the opening paragraph, “ By an Act of the Imperial Legislature, the responsible trust of the Government of India has again been placed in our hands.” If the despatch is impracticable, let them ask for its repeal. SECOND, ABOUT MISSION COLLEGES. It is most desirable that, in order to the efficient and economical management of mission colleges, the different Evangelical Churches co-operate in supporting and managing them. At first these educational missions were entirely conducted by the Church of Scotland, and only one was set up in each Presidential city. But ere long, one after another of the leading missionary societies started on the same line—a most gratifying evidence of the proved efficiency of the system which Dr. Duff may be said to have originated, but leading to what cannot but be deplored as a needless waste in men and money. So long as the Presbyterian Church of Scotland made this line of action a speciality in mission work, for which, as the Church of John Knox, she was peculiarly fitted, it made a good division of labour, taking the missions in India as one body working for one great end; but when each began to add this feature to their other work, or to give up other forms of work for this, it had the necessary effect of multiplying small educational institutions, with a small number of pupils, either with a small staff of teachers, m which case they were inefficient, or with a large staff, and then the average cost of each pupil was very high. 55 It is found, then, that four or five European professors, with Economy. native assistants, can teach 300 or 400 pupils as well as they could teach a fourth part of the number, which reduces the cost of each pupil in proportion. At present the number of pupils, in aided colleges, is on an average only seventy-four to each. Far too small a number to pay, as they might be made to do, the great part, if not eventually nearly the whole, of their own expenses, but for the wasteful competition amongst themselves, and still more the unequal competition with Government institutions. A slight rise in the fee with increased attendance would make colleges self-supporting. An example of this kind of co-operation has been exhi- A partial bited in Madras under the able presidency and through the ora Ra exertions of Mr. Miller, with the most satisfactory results— the Church of England, the Established Church of Scotland, and the Methodist Missionary Societies, all contributing to the Free Church College, under a board of management on the spot. Itis hoped that these societies and others will combine at home for a general movement, which may establish mission colleges of a high class, in greater force, at more stations, and at less expense to each society than at present. Another point of great importance is to see that such a A full staff staff of professors and teachers is kept up, as shall admit niches A hp of greater attention being paid to evangelistic work in the colleges and amongst those who have passed through our educational institutions. This work must, as a rule, be done by the professors, not by a separate class set apart as evangelists. They would be looked on with distrust, and would not get the hold on old 7 scholars which a former teacher would. Every professor and Must be evan- teacher must be an evangelist, who carries his evangelistic ae spirit into the school and college, every day, and at all times. By having a larger staff, there could always be one in turn engaged in looking after, and addressing as occasion offered, old graduates of their own or Government colleges, in the towns, and by occasional itinerancy in the surrounding gporadic and country for scattering the seed of the Word where it may concnne fall into the hearts of old pupils, and recall old lessons. This kind of sporadic work, conducted on a concentric prin- # Normal schools and colleges. The Church’s duty, over- © sight and prayer. Hinduism to fall not by dis- integration ; but in mass, like old tower. 56 ciple, would be of great use. Each college should be a centre, and the circle would correspond with the radius from which its graduates were drawn. It is a shame to the Church that by having almost all our colleges undermanned it was impossible to carry on such work in a methodical and efficient way. Another branch of work which ought to be greatly extended, is the training of teachers for the elementary schools. If a large number of well-qualified teachers were trained, they would soon get employment throughout the country, if the stimulus were given to the elementary educa- tion which was originally intended by the despatch of 1854. In the last place, let there be more intelligent oversight, and earnest prayer by the Church at home; and we hope, that, ere long, we may see glorious results. There is a great leavening process going on in Hindu thought and feeling. There is a conviction diffused that the Christian system is the true, and will be the triumphant religion in India. There will be opposition, there may be a conflict, imperiling our rule, if not our existence, in the country, ere that triumph is attained, but it will come, and it will, we believe, come with a sudden and mighty rush which will startle and amaze an incredulous age. Hinduism is like no other system that now exists, or has ever existed in the world. It seems as if it would defy those processes of disintegration, by which believers may be gathered by units or tens or hundreds from other sects and races, in other systems, in other lands, or even in India, as among the aboriginal tribes, or those simpler races in Tinevelley and Travancore, which never fully partook of the fatal privileges of Brahminical religion, and were never brought within the iron bondage of caste, where missions have been so largely successful. Hinduism defies the tooth of time and the tool of the engineer to disintegrate it, or to pick out a stone from the hard and compact structure, except in a few rare and exceptional cases, and the intensity of passion with which these few conversions are felt and resented shows how perfect is the unity of the body—“ If one member suffers all the members suffer with it.” When Hinduism falls, it will fall as those grand old towers fall which have outlived the age and state of society for which 57 they were constructed ; so strongly cemented that they will stand or fall entire—they cannot be taken down like our frail modern structures, stone by stone. It is only by the By under- slow and persevering process of sapping and mining that they ee can be brought to the ground, and they fall in one solid mass. It is thus that this great donjon, in which super- stition and caste have kept the millions of India as in a castle of despair, will one day fall, “to rise no more at all.” A thousand agencies are at work to undermine it, secular and religious, and we wish them all God-speed ; but none can compare with the full and clear proclamation of the glorious Gospel, in thoroughly equipped and efficiently conducted educational institutions, in which Divine light is thrown on every subject of human study, by generous and disinterested men of the highest culture and Christian character. in, vad i ee baa | tno oli prod t QmEpRAT nD Yoh Oe mbaoreitods ata abet oc nt Me (itiid souls jae sak Lk Ah ee Ra OD ae galitin it Tyee | ul @ t0 Anoons ithe Hoa dio ct hat fo nba AYES) ath oe yn teins Hi oj bse aid Jods onde ie: it i fe at bh atval - no Pita Liu oa dd grad olecy r mobs Bila da One Ost Gare OS tat Naito iw wdhacanly ia lt, | mllioow. tk ating diw | Sp zt a OL. Per Oy ath hitnatra 1 a : any oro het eh i El, shit ‘ow frites i nrolyite’ bie rortoly aus 16 folds bay Lair My finn Tek ail) hin wa lce ft Holoubade, quinoa, Baie adi by Vidi di, at f qi (ir mao eb dsbatl eenve Chai car Me angus r asroid dm yt fiw bik euenannipyl cent ‘anil? Ay 390% B: rdw nS ti tidy inal Siva pantie seotkgly “es ~ >= a eo APPENDICES. APPENDIX A. It is not necessary that I go back to the earlier periods of our intercourse with that country. Without reckoning the embassy which King Arthur is said to have sent out in 883, our direct connection with India may be said to date from the year 160], when a “company of merchants trading to the East Indies,” with a capital of £75,000, sent out five vessels, varying from 600 to 130 tons, carrying £6860 in goods and £28,742 in bullion. Our attempts to impart the higher blessings of education and religion date from a much more recent period. To our disgrace, two cen- turies passed without any attempt by the nation or the Church to confer any benefit, material or spiritual, on the natives of India. Individual efforts for the amelioration and enlightenment of the population were made. Noble philanthropists and earnest Christ- ians made the pages of our history bright with their deeds, all the more bright and worthy of admiration from the general darkness and the opposition they met with from those in power. APPENDIX B. Tt is, I believe, a great mistake to suppose that by our professing that we would rule the country in the fear and according to the revealed will of our God, we would have endangered our position in India. On the contrary, it would have strengthened our posi- tion, and have tended to secure the confidence of the natives. Keeping our religion in the back-ground is the way to excite their suspicions. They, like all weak races, are accustomed to gain their ends by concealment and duplicity, and they never doubt but that we have some deep and dangerous policy concealed under our ostentatious form of ignoring religion. They naturally think that it is our interest to make them adopt our religion. They 60 cannot conceive of a religion that does not pervade every depart- ment of human life,—personal, social, and political. Their own religion covers the whole of life, and they cannot be convinced that ours does not. They necessarily and rightly conclude that it ought to do so. The practical effect of our neutral policy is to excite distrust and fear, and lays us open to the constant suspicion of a deep-laid scheme to undermine their religion or to convert them by strata- gem. The nature of religion, as they understand it, makes this not only possible, but easy, if not inevitable. By the essential out- wardness and minute observances of their system they know that they may be made outcasts from society, and put beyond the pale of their religion by a most trifling outward act or circumstance entirely independent of their own intention or will,—a mere accident or oversight of their own, or a malicious act of another may be the cause of ruin to multitudes both for this world and the next. It is this feature of the religion of the Hindus, coupled with their suspicion of our designs, that makes those rumours of our intention to convert them by means of force or fraud possible of belief and so dangerous to the Government. Had we at the beginning of our rule, or when proclaiming the empire in 1858 done two things—First, had we frankly and publicly declared that we were ourselves Christians, and that we believed it was the only true religion, and the best for all men, but that we had no intention of interfering with any man in his religious beliefs.* That we held the domain of conscience to be beyond and above the province of civil government, and appealed to the facts of our historic neutrality in this sense for these hundred years. Second, that the essential nature of our holy religion was such, that no power on earth could make a man a Christian against his will, That a mere outward profession of Christianity was an insult to our God, and would be of no use to its professor in this or in another world, That Christianity was a religion of faith and love and holy living, and that any service which was not rendered with the heart and of free will, was a mockery, and that the Government would prefer an honest and upright heathen to a hypocritical and false professor of Christianity. Had such a course been pursued from the first, a widespread rebellion like that of 1857, excited by the rumour of our convert- * We gratefully admit the frank avowal of personal belief in Christianity by our noble Queen. But the proclamation failed in not avowing that our Govern- ment would be regulated by the principles of the Word of God. 61 ing the soldiers by making them bite off the ends of cartridges greased with cow’s fat, would have been impossible, even in credulous and suspicious India. Had our country pursued such a course, it might, with the blessing of God, have stayed the horrors of that war, and it might have hastened the establishment of the kingdom of peace. If from books we turn to the men who have had the destiny of millions put into their hands, we are struck with warm admiration of the many noble lives which have been devoted to the welfare of our Eastern Empire. The profound wisdom displayed in the most trying circumstances, the calm courage in presence of appalling danger, the indomitable perseverance in overcoming Herculean difficulties, and above all the noble self-consecration and often self-sacrifice in serving a people who could not appreciate their aims or their motives, and often returned ingratitude for kindness and hatred for love, are an honour to our country and a blessing to the race. APPENDIX C. I cannot resist the temptation to quote the following testimony to the character of Zachary Macaulay from the lips of Mr. Gladstone, when speaking in opposition to the son of that noble old man :— “T can only speak from tradition of the struggle for the aboli- tion of slavery ; but if I have not been misinformed, there was engaged in it a man who was the unseen ally of Mr. Wilberforce and the pillar of his strength ; a man of profound benevolence, of acute understanding, of indefatigable industry, and of that self- denying temper which is content to work in secret, to forego the recompense of present fame, and to seek for its reward beyond the grave. The name of that man was Zachary Macaulay, and his son is a member in the existing Cabinet.” APPENDIX D. Despatcu oF 1854. The following brief summary of this important despatch is by the pen of the Secretary for the Home Department in India, prepared by authority for the Houses of Parliament :— “The Indian educational code is contained in the despatches of the Home Government of 1854 and 1859. The main object of the former despatch is to divert the efforts of the Government ae bd ane Ste from the education of the higher classes upon whom they had up to that date been too exclusively directed, and to turn them to the wider diffusion of education among all classes of the people, and especially to the provision of primary instruction for the masses. Such instruction is to be provided by the direct instru- mentality of Government, and a compulsory rate, levied under the direct authority of Goverment, is pointed out as the best means of obtaining funds for the purpose. The system must be extended upwards by the establishment of Government schools as models, to be superseded gradually by schools supported on the grant-in-aid principle. This principle is to be of perfect religious neutrality, defined in regular rules adapted to the circumstances of each province, and clearly and publicly placed before the natives of India. Schools, whether purely Government institutions or aided, in all of which (excepting Normal schools) the payment of some fee, however small, is to be the rule, are to be in regular gradation from those which give the humblest elementary instruction to the highest colleges, and the best pupils of one grade are to. climb through the other grades by means of scholarships obtained in the lower school and tenable in the higher. To provide masters, Normal schools are to be established in each province, and moderate allowances given for the support of those who possess an aptness for teaching and are willing to devote themselves to the profession of schoolmasters. By this means it is hoped that, at no distant period, institutions may be in operation in all the presidencies calculated to supply masters for all classes of schools, and thus in time greatly to limit, if not altogether to obviate, the necessity of recruiting the educational service by means of engagements made in England. The medium of education is to be the vernacular languages of India, into which the best elementary treatises in English should be translated. Such translations are to be advertised for, and liberally rewarded by Government as the means of enriching vernacular literature. While, therefore, the vernacular languages are on no account to be neglected, the English language may be taught where there is a demand for it, but the English language is not to be substituted for the vernacular dialects of the country. The existing institutions for the study of the classical languages of India are to be maintained, and respect is to be paid to the hereditary veneration which they command. Female education is to receive the frank and cordial support of Government, as by it a far greater proportional impulse is imparted to the educational and moral tone of the people, than by the education of men. In addition to the Government and aided 63 colleges and schools for gegferal education, special institutions for imparting special education in law, medicine, engineering, art, and agriculture are to recelve in every province the direct aid and encouragement of Government. The agency by which this system of education is to be carried out is a director in each province, assisted by a competent staff of inspectors, care being taken that the cost of control shall be kept in fair proportion to the cost of direct measures of instruction. To complete the system in each presidency, a university is to be established, on the model of the London University, at each of the three presidency towns. These universities not to be themselves places of education, but they are to test the value of the education given elsewhere; they are to pass every student of ordinary ability who has fairly profited by the curriculum of school and college study which he has passed through, the standard required being such as to command respect without discouraging the efforts of deserving students. Education is to be aided and supported by the principal officials in every district, and is to receive, besides, the direct encouragement of the State by the opening of Government appointments to those who have received a good education, irrespective of the place or manner in which it may have been acquired ; and in the lower situations, by preferring a man who can read and write, and is equally eligible in other respects, to one who cannot.” * * Parliamentary Blue Book, 1870, p. 7. LORIMER AND GILLIES, PRINTERS, 31 ST. ANDREW SQUARE, EDINBURGH, = phy eede “Ot EDUCATIONAL POLICY IN INDIA A Gttal Question 4 FOR THE GOVERNMENT AND THE CHURCH. DEDICATED BY PERMISSION TOR THE RIGHT HON. VISCOUNT HALIFAX, P.C., G.C.B., AUTHOR OF THE “DESPATCH ON GENERAL EDUCATION” OF 1864; “THE MAGNA CHARTA OF EDUCATION IN INDIA.” BY REV. JAMES JOHNSTON, SENIOR MINISTER OF ST. JAMES’S FREE CHURCH, GLASGOW. ++ EDINBURGH: JOHN MACLAREN & SON. LONDON: JAMES NISBET & CO. 1879. . = : is Le ee ee a a Ve INTRODUCTION. No yours in the world stood more in need of sound intellectual and moral training than that of India. In no nation was there more need for education being based on the pure morality of the Word of God, and fit holy example of the Saviour of men when Government awoke to its responsibility to give instruction to Indian subjects. Under the erroneous impression that to teach religion would imperil the empire, schools and colleges were set up, without any recognition of religion, at the expense of, and under ‘iis direct Perel of, the Government, which soon produced the evils which might have been expected in such circum- stances and with such a population. Had the East Indian Government been as well acquainted with India and human nature as the late Lord Lawrence, they would have known that their fears were groundless. The following words from an old despatch are worthy of that true Christian statesman :— “Sir John Lawrence does entertain the earnest belief that all those measures which are really and truly Christian can be carried out in India; not only without danger to British rule, but, on the contrary, with every advantage to its stability. Christian things done in a Christian way will never, the Chief Commissioner is convinced, alienate the heathen.” as It was in 1858 that I first saw the injurious effects of the operation of direct education in the higher departments of study by the Government, and the ereat good that might be effected by a judicious assistance of independent effort on the part of the natives, and by calling forth the liberality of British residents, and encouraging the labours of missionary societies. The publication of the Education Despatch of 1854 was hailed by the friends of India as the wisest and best solution of a great and difficult question, which, in the circumstances, could be expected, although some ardent and enthusiastic Christians looked for a more decided and even aggressive policy in regard to Christian teaching. Christian educationists saw that if the provisions of the Despatch for aiding equally native and mission schools and colleges, as was most explicitly promised and provided for in the Despatch, was faithfully carried out, there would be no difficulty in the way of the rapid and almost indefinite extension of Christian instruction. Not by asking any special favour for their institutions over those of the natives. Not by any forcing of Christianity by Government authority ; but by the natural and laudable method of providing the highest form of education in seeular studies, alone with the knowledge of Divine truth and the love of God, which commend themselves to the understand- ing and heart even of the heathen when taught in a loving and sympathetic spirit. It was their ardent hope that the moral, social, and political evils which they saw and lamented, as the inevitable outcome of direct Government education without religion, would in a large measure disappear, 5 along with the Government colleges which were so largely responsible for them, and that they would be able to do a great work for the Government and people of India, by educating enlightened and loyal youths, trained in sound moral principles, and if not Christian in profession, largely embued with Christian truth and respect for Christian character, as exemplified by, and admired in, their Christian teachers. For these five-and-twenty years I have watched the operation of that Education Despatch in silence, and have seen it year by year more and more perverted from its original design. The higher education has been fostered and pampered, and the lower education, to a like extent, comparatively neglected. Direct education in Government colleges, instead of being withdrawn, has been ‘largely extended, and aided colleges discouraged and reduced. And of late years I have seen what was formerly cold indifference, on the part of influential Government servants, turned into positive aversion to our best Christian colleges, which are now, in some cases, threatened with extinction. Not having been engaged in the work, and having never come into conflict with either system, and these last twenty years being a minister at home, and equally independent of all parties, I hope to deal with the question, as faras possible, free from prejudice or passion. If prejudice were to sway my judgement, it would be in favour of a bold recognition of religion by the Government, and the public teaching of the Bible in Government schools and colleges on a grand national system of education. It is with reluctance and pain that I am driven to the conclusion, that such a system is not suited to the present condition of India, and the circumstances of the case. 6 Every careful reader of the following pages, will see that it is not the Government, either at home or in India, with which I find fault. Abundant proof is given that Government has never intentionally or formally departed from the original intention of the Despatch of 1854. It is a question entirely free from any political or party bearing. The present Governor- General, Lord Lytton, as will be seen from a recent speech, 1s as loyal to the spirit of the Despatch as any who has occupied the viceregal throne. Any fault I may find with the Government at home, is a lack of watchfulness, in not seeing that their in- tention was carried out, and any complaint against the Government in India, is, that it has allowed the management of this department of its work to fall into the wrong hands,—The hands of those personally engaged in tuition, who from their profession and cir- cumstances are, however good their intentions, inca- pable of understanding the wants of the country, or the defect of their own systems. It is in no spirit of hostility to Government that I take up my pen, but with a desire to lay facts before our rulers, and to assist in forming a sound public opinion to support them in doing what will be a difficult and in some respects a painful duty. I have cause for satisfaction with the impression produced on many, by the first issue of this pamphlet. None of those who denied the accuracy of my inter- pretation of the Education Despatch in former brief publications, have questioned the thoroughness of the proofs in this more complete form. But, that there might be no possibility of doubt on this vital point, I resolved to add to the cogency of logical demonstration, the additional weight of authoritative testimony. 7 The highest authority I could consult was the author of the Despatch of 1854, then, as Sir Charles Wood, H.M. Secretary of State for India, and still as Viscount Halifax ably taking his part in the House of Lords, especially in questions of Indian policy. On forward- ing a copy of the first edition, with the request that his Lordship would favour me with his candid opinion as to the construction I had put on his Education Despatch, I had the satisfaction of receiving the follow- ing reply :— “ HIcKLETON, DONCASTER, 5th July, 1879. “ Srr,—I only reached home two or three days ago, and I have lost no time in reading your pamphlet on Education in India. “T have read it with the greatest interest. You give a most accurate account of the intention and purport of the Despatch of 1854. The subject was one of great import- ance, and great care was taken in framing the Despatch. “T have never seen any reason to doubt the wisdom of the course which was then taken. The views expressed in it were well received by all who took an interest in Indian education, and I have good reason to be grateful to many of the best Indians for the manner in which they have spoken of it. “The great object was to promote the general education of the people of India, and to learn the higher and richer portion of the population to provide mainly for their own education. It was the grant-in-aid system, as applied to Church and Dissenting schools in this country, applied in India to schools of all religions; so far as the mass of the people were concerned. The upper classes were to contri- bute largely to their own education as they practically do at the English Universities. All this, of course, mutatis mutandis: in a country so unlike England as India. “JT am very sorry to see from your pamphlet how far this principle has been departed from, and how large a portion 8 of the grants devoted to educational purposes in India is applied to the higher branches. “This is entirely contrary to the intention of the Despatch of 1854, which has been followed up since, and is the recognised policy of the Home Government of India. “It is in my opinion quite wrong—TI remain, your obd. servt., HALIFAX. “The Rev. J. JOHNSTON,” Oprntion oF Lorp Lytton, GovERNOR-GENERAL oF LypIA. In a recent speech addressed to the University and Government College of the Punjab, His Excellency is reported to have advocated the withdrawal of direct Government education in the higher departments, in language more clear and forcible than I have em- ployed. His words are— “There are still a great many learned, philanthropic, and enthusiastic persons who held, and hold, that it is the duty 9 of the British Government in India to cover this country with educational hot-beds and forcing-houses, and provide a permanent artificial supply of high-class, and, I may say, high-pressure, education, quite regardless of the existence or non-existence of any natural demand for it. I confess that I could never share that opinion, and therefore I am thank- ful that the rule was then at least laid down, that Govern- ment colleges and schools in India should be regarded, not as permanent institutions, but simply as an initiatory stimu- lant to the natural growth of that popular demand for edu- cation, which, when sufficiently developed, is sure to find its natural supply in flourishing private institutions.” VIEWS OF THE COMMISSIONER OF HYDERABAD ASSIGNED DISTRICTS. ye ; a. J but To show that the highest representatives of Govern- ment are still sound in their views, and desire to see the Despatch faithfully carried out, I might quote from many official judgments which have been passed during these many years. I shall give one so clearly expressing my own views, that I could wish for nothing more than to see it enforced. But, un- happily, the same views have been expressed a hun- dred times by Governors and Commissioners, and have produced no results beyond an annual letter or two on either side, and a return to the status quo. The vis inertie of large official bodies and great vested interests is hard to overcome. In reviewing the Report of the Director of Public Instruction for the Province, he says— “Tt is an easy thing to open schools with Government funds; the difficult thing is to induce the people to start and support their own schools.” “Hitherto we have been almost too well off (in official revenues). The desire for education is undoubtedly spread- 10 ing. Petitions for new schools are, the Director writes, ‘flung into my tonga,’ and can now be gratified only by making the people pay a part of the cost of what they want.” . “What I wouldurge is that, in the interest of education, the Director is bound to do something to increase the num- ber of aided schools, and to show that he looks forward to the day when the functions of his office will be confined to two, viz., inspection and training of teachers. No YEAR WILL BE REGARDED BY ME AS QUITE A SATISFACTORY YEAR, IN WHICH NO STEP SHALL HAVE BEEN TAKEN TO THIS END.” THE LATE Riaut Hon. Lorp -LAWRENCE. There is one other authority to which [ must refer, one whose recent death the nation mourns—the late Lord Lawrence, the ‘‘ Saviour of our Indian Empire” in the rebellion of 1857—one whose sympathy and encouragement in this movement has sustained me amidst opposition and difficulties. In acknowledging my first brief paper on the duty of Government to withdraw from direct teaching in colleges and higher schools, his Lordship wrote: “I concur generally in your views, but the matter would require delicate handling, and could only be carried out by very slow degrees.” After naming some distinguished men whose opinion on the subject would be worth having, his Lordship suggested a meeting in London to consult as to what course ought to be taken, and in a subsequent: letter expressed his willingness to call such a meeting in his own house, as from the state of his health he was not able to attend public meetings. I gneve to think that no such meeting can now be held under his distinguished presidency, and aided by his extensive knowledge and great sagacity. I fondly hope that i amidst his many admirers, some will be ready to assist in carrying out his wishes on this subject: I give the last note with which I was favoured in regard to a report which I had drawn up on this subject, of which the present pamphlet is only an expansion. ‘There is no recommendation in the latter which was not in the former. It was sent to his Lordship with the request that he would kindly suggest any alteration that he thought needful. The following is his reply :— “93 QuEEN’s GATE GARDENS, S.W., 19th February, 1879. ~ “ My Dear Sir,—I have read over the proof copy of the proposed report of the Free Church on Higher Education among the natives in India. I do not feel disposed to suggest any alterations in it. In its general scope and object I agree; but I think that any change such as is suggested in reducing the expenditure of the Government on Higher Education, should only be gradually and cautiously carried out, or else it would raise a cry which might do harm. I think the best plan would be for some time longer to appeal to the public opinion in England and India, in the way this report is calculated to do. . . . These appear to be the views of those I have consulted, in which I concur.— Yours faithfully, : “LAWRENCE. “Rev, JAMES JOHNSTON, &c.” SECOND EDITION, with INTRODUCTION. OUR EDUCATIONAL POLICY IN INDIA. DEDICATED BY PERMISSION TO THE RIGHT HONOURABLE THE VISCOUNT HALIFAX, P.C., 6.0.3, AUTHOR OF THE “ DESPATCH ON GENERAL EDUCATION IN INDIA” OF 1854, BY THE REV. JAMES JOHNSTON. “The main object of the despatch” of 1854, containing the present Code of Education for India, “igs to divert the efforts of the Government from the education of the higher classes, upon whom they had up to that date been too exclusively directed, and to turn them to the wider diffusion of education among all classes of the people, and especially to the provision of primary instruc- tion for the masses.” —Parliamentary Blue Book, 1870. “And now, after a lapse of twenty years, the emergent unavoidable question is, Why are there @ not plain indications of its speedy accomplishment? Is it not owing to the lack of faithfulness « to its principles in the Education Department, tolerated by the Bengal Government.”—Alla- habad Mission Conference, 1873. fi ) FOURTH THOUSAND. EDINBURGH: JOHN MACLAREN & SON. GLASGOW: DAVID BRYCE & SON. LONDON: JAMES NISBET & CO. 1880. Price One Shilling. [ iv ] It was in 1853 that I first saw the injurious effects of the operation of direct education in the higher departments of study by the Government, and the ereat good that might be effected, by a judicious assistance of independent effort on the part of the natives, by calling forth the liberality of British residents, and encouraging the labours of missionary societies, The publication of the Education Despatch of 1854 was hailed by the friends of India as the wisest and best solution of a great and difficult question, which, in the circumstances, could be expected, although some ardent and enthusiastic Christians looked for a more decided and even aggressive policy in regard to Christian teaching, Christian educationists saw that if the provisions for aiding equally, native and mission schools and colleges, as was most explicitly promised and _ pro- vided for in the Despatch, were faithfully carried out, there would be no dificulty in the way of the rapid and almost indefinite extension of Christian instruction; not by asking any special favour for their institutions over those of the natives; not by any forcing of Christianity by Government authority ; but by the natural and laudable method of providing the highest form of education in secular studies, along with the knowledge of Divine truth and the love of God, which commend themselves to the understand- ing and heart even of the heathen, when taught in a loving and sympathetic spirit. It was their ardent hope that the moral, social, and political evils which they saw and lamented, as the inevitable outcome of direct Government education without religion, would in a large measure disappear, Rie ic along with the Government colleges which were chiefly responsible for them; and that they would be ‘able to do a great work for the Government and people of India, by raising up enlightened and loyal youths, trained in sound moral principles, and if not Christian in profession, largely embued with Christian truth and respect for Christian character, as exemplified by, and admired in, their Christian teachers. For these five-and-twenty years I have watched the operation of that Education Despatch in silence, and have seen it year by year more and more perverted from its original design. The higher education has been fostered and pampered, and the lower education, to a like extent, comparatively neglected. Direct education in Government colleges, instead of being withdrawn, has been largely extended, and aided colleges discouraged and reduced. And of late years I have seen what was formerly cold indifference, on the part of influential Government servants, turned into positive aversion to our best Christian colleges, which are now, in some cases, threatened with extinction. Not having been engaged in the work, and having never come into conflict with either system, and these last twenty years being a minister at home, and equally independent of all parties, I hope to deal with the question, as far as possible, free from prejudice or passion. If prejudice were to sway my judgment, it would be in favour of a bold recognition of religion by the Government, and the public teaching of the Bible in Government schools and colleges on a grand national system of education. It is with reluctance and pain that I am driven to the conclusion, that such a system is not suited to the present condition of India, and the circumstances of the case. [ aq Every careful reader of the following pages, will see that it is not the Government, either at home or in India, with which I find fault, and the question is happily quite free from any political or party bearing. Abundant proof is given that Government has never intentionally or formally departed from the original intention of the,Despatch of 1854. The Government of the late Lord Derby ratified the Act of their pre- decessors in office in the important Despatch of 1859, issued after the suppression of the mutiny of 1857, and the present Governor-General, Lord Lytton, as will be seen from a recent speech, is as loyal to the spirit of the Despatch as any who has occupied the viceregal throne. Any fault I may find with the Government at home, is a lack of watchfulness, in not seeing that their in- tention was carried out, and any complaint against the Government in India, is, that it has allowed the management of this department of its work to fall into the wrong hands; the hands of those personally engaged in tuition, who from their profession and cir- cumstances are, however good their intentions, inca- pable of understanding the wants of the country, or the defect of their own systems. In a letter lately received from one of the most eminent Christian educators in India, he says of his own ‘‘ Province” “Our Government cannot be called hostile to us; but they are supremely indifferent to the whole question, and just throw the reins on the Director’s neck.” It is in no spirit of hostility to Government that I take up my pen, but with a desire to lay facts before our rulers, and to assist in forming a sound public opinion to support them in doing what will be a difficult and in some respects a painful duty. f iu 7 | I: have cause for satisfaction with the impression produced on many, by the first issue of this pamphlet. None of those who denied the accuracy of my inter- pretation of the Education Despatch in former brief publications, have questioned the thoroughness of the proofs in this more complete form. But, that there might be no possibility of doubt on this vital point, I resolved to add to the cogency of logical demonstration, the additional weight of authoritative testimony. The highest authority I could consult was the author of the Despatch of 1854, Sir Charles Wood, then President of “the Board of Control,” and afterwards H.M. Secretary of State for India, and now as Viscount Halifax ably taking his part in the House of Lords, especially in questions of Indian policy. On forward- ing a copy of the first edition, with the request that his Lordship would favour me with his candid opinion as to the construction I had put on his Education Despatch, I had the satisfaction of receiving the follow- ing reply :— “ HICcKLETON, DoncastTER, “Sth July, 1879. “S1r,—I only reached home two or three days ago, and I have lost no time in reading your pamphlet on Education in India. “T have read it with the greatest interest. You give a most accurate account of the intention and purport of the Despatch of 1854. The subject was one of. great import- ance, and great care was taken in framing the Despatch. “‘T have never seen any reason to doubt the wisdom of the course which was then taken. ‘The views expressed in it were well received by all who took an interest in Indian education, and I have good reason to be grateful to many of the best Indians for the manner in which they have spoken of it. [ viii ] “The great object was to promote the general education of the people of India, and to leave the higher and richer portion of the population to provide mainly for their own education. It was the grant-in-aid system, applied in India to schools of all religions, so far as the mass of the people were concerned, as applied in this country to Church and Dissenting schools. The upper classes were to contri- bute largely to their own education as they practically do at the English Universities. All this, of course, mutatis mutandis: in a country so unlike England as India. “T am very sorry to see from your pamphlet how far this principle has been departed from, and how large a portion of the grants devoted to educational purposes in India is applied to the higher branches. “This is entirely contrary to the intention of the Despatch of 1854, which has been followed up since, and is the recognised policy of the Home Government of India, and is in my opinion quite wrong.—I remain, your obd. servt., “ HALIFAX. “The Rev. J. Jounstron.” THe EARL OF DERBY. The present Karl of Derby, who, when Lord Stanley, succeeded Sir Charles Wood as Secretary of State for India under the ministry of his noble father, in the Despatch of 1859 says in reference to that of 1854, “ Her Majesty's Government would be very reluctant to disturb existing rules by any change of system which might give occasion to misapprehension ;” and regarding the disputed point—the withdrawal of Government from direct education—he is most explicit. In paragraph 46 he says, “It bemg hoped THat PRIVATE SCHOOLS AIDED BY GOVERNMENT WOULD EVENTUALLY TAKE THE PLACE wniversally OF THE SEVERAL CLASSES OF GOVERNMENT INSTITUTIONS.” THE DukKE or ARGYLL. Judging from the despatches which I find in Govern- ment returns, no man took such a_ watchful ‘and intelheent interest in the question of education in India as His Grace the Duke of Argyll while he held the office of H.M. Secretary for India from 1868-74. Along with the first issue of the following pamphlet, I sent a copy of Lord Halifax’s letter, with the request that his Grace would say whether his views of the Despatch of 1854 were substantially the same as those of his Lordship. ‘To explain the reference in the reply to education by missionaries, [ should mention that I had expressed my fear lest missionaries should be compelled to relinquish the higher teaching, owing to the rules laid down for aided “ANE and colleges not being carried out according to the letter and spirit of the Despatch. The following is the brief but important answer with which I am favoured, written during a short interval of well-earned rest :— “*¢ CoLuMBA’ YACHT, “OBAN, 25th August, 1879. “Rev. Str—I have been yachting, and unable sooner to reply to your letter of the 14th. “T have not seen the pamphlet which it refers to. But I may say at once, that Lord Halifax’s letter, of which you enclose a copy, represents the general view which I am dis- posed to take of the important subject you refer to. “When I return home I hope to be able to read the pamphlet. ‘“T should be very sorry to hear that the missionaries had to give up their efforts for the education of India, unless it can be shown that a better substitute has been provided.— Your obedient servant, “ ARGYLL.” [ xii ] your views, but the matter would require delicate handling, and could only be carried out by very slow degrees.” After naming some distinguished men whose opinion on the subject would be worth having, his Lordship suggested a meeting in London to consult as to what course ought to be taken, and in a subsequent letter expressed his willingness to call such a meeting in his own house, as from the state of his health he was not | able to attend public meetings. I grieve to think that no such meeting can now be held under his distinguished presidency, and aided by his extensive knowledge and great sagacity. I fondly hope that amidst his many admirers, some will be ready to assist in carrying out his wishes on this subject. I give the last note with which I was favoured in regard to a report which I had drawn up on this subject, of which the present pamphlet is only an expansion. There is no recommendation in the latter which was not in the former. It was sent to his Lordship with the request that he would kindly suggest any alteration that he thought needful. The following is his reply :— | “93 QUEEN’S GATE GARDENS, 8. W., “19th February, 1879. “My Dear Sir,—I have read over the proof copy of the proposed report of the Free Church on Higher Education among the natives in India. I do not feel disposed to suggest any alterations in it. In its general scope and object I agree; but I think that any change such as is suggested in reducing the expenditure of the Government on Higher Education, should only be gradually and cautiously carried out, or else it would raise a cry which might do harm. I think the best plan would be for some time longer to appeal to the public opinion in England and India, in the way [ xii] this report is calculated to do. . . . These appear to be the views of those I have consulted, in which I concur.— Yours faithfully, “LAWRENCE. “Rev. JAMES JOHNSTON, &c.” THE TIME FoR ACTION IN THIS CouUNTRY. That the present is the proper time for taking up this question, is now admitted by those who have seriously given their minds to the consideration of it. If not prosecuted with energy now, it must be aban- doned for ever. Matters cannot continue as they are. Christian educators in India had done their best and failed to induce Government there to carry out the principles of the Despatch of 1854, and now appeal to friends at home to approach Government. Private individuals, like myself and others, had begun to call attention to the subject last year, and public bodies have taken it up. The Church Missionary Society, which has done so much for education in India, addressed a circular to all similar societies in this country in the montl: of January last, in which they say :— “The Committee of the Church Missionary Society feel that the time has come when a strong representation should be made to the Home Government on this subject, which is of so momentous concern to our fellow-subjects in India. In common with other Missionary Societies, they heartily welcome the Despatch of 1854. . . . They now, however, see the principle of the Despatch to a great extent reversed ; the grant-in-aid system discouraged rather than fostered ; the chief efforts of Government expended in providing edu- cation for those who could provide it for themselves, or for whom it could be otherwise provided; the primary education of the masses left to a large extent untouched; and the weight of the authority of Government given meanwhile [| to a view of education which is sure in time to produce results disastrous to the moral and social wellbeing of the country.” It has been demonstrated in the following pages, _and established by clear and emphatic testimony that the design of the Despatch of 1854 was to extend general education to the people of India, and to leave the higher education to be provided, with partial aid from Government, at the expense of the richer classes who desired it, and by the benevolent associations of natives and foreigners interested in the welfare of the youth of India—of these happily there are many. We are therefore fully justified in demanding that a large proportion of Government grants be devoted to the education of the poor. By the present working of the Act, this reasonable and generous policy is reversed. Upwards of £186,000 is expended on the higher education of a few in Government schools, and only £86,000 on the poor in the whole of India, with the addition of a small sum eiven in the form of grants-in-aid to native and mission schools. | It will also be seen that we are fully justified in demanding that the economical system of grants- in-aid, as provided for in the Despatch, should be extended, and the costly Government colleges be gradu- ally withdrawn. It is utterly inexcusable that the sum of £92,000 should be spent on educating 3300 young men in Government colleges, when, as we show, half that number are now educated in aided colleges at the small cost to Government of about £8000. In the Government colleges each student costs the Imperial Treasury, on an average, £28 a-year. Those educated in aided colleges only cost the Government a I soe | little over £5 per annum. And they could edueate twice, or even three times the number they now teach, at a very trifling cost to the institutions, and without any additional charge to the Government. When I call attention to the fact, that education in Government colleges leads to irreligion, discontent, and disloyalty, let it be distinctly understood that I neither lay the entire blame on Government colleges for the effects produced, nor do I exempt other colleges from producing, in many cases, like results. I know that leht in its purest form cannot be shed into the dark chambers of heathenism without causing keen mental conflicts, which may be expected to lead to errors on the most vital subjects. We need not wonder at the unhinging of religious beliefs and the adoption of dangerous opinions in morals and politics. What I do object to, is, first, that Government knowingly em- ploy the money of their heathen subjects to uproot, by indirect means, the belief of the youth of India, when there is no necessity for their doing so, and second, when they know that they are robbing the natives of their gods, they offer no substitute to fill the aching void, which they are responsible for having made. That the conduct of the Government, or rather of those to whom they have “thrown the reins,” is unjustifiable in the present circumstances of India, is seen in the great and growing demand for Educa- tion which is shown in the following pages, enough to ensure the supply of means; and educational agencies are now in the field, which can be easily extended to meet the largest possible demand. A weak objection is made to the proposal to with- draw the colleges supported by Government, on the ground, that if the natives came forward in any force [* syle] to supply their place, the effect would be the same, as the higher education necessarily overturns their heathen systems, based as they are on physical errors. But surely there is a vast difference between undermining the religious beliefs of the Heathen by Government officials, in Government colleges, paid out of Government taxes derived from a heathen popu- lation, and the Heathen upsetting their own creed, in their own colleges, by teachers of their own choice. As to any discontent or disloyalty, there would be no excuse for either, on the ground of false hopes being excited, as I have shown in the following pages is the case by the present system. There would still be the mental ferment, and in many cases the moral chaos, which are almost inevitable at a time of transition from a condition of mental and moral darkness and of political tyranny, to a new era of intellectual ight and comparative liberty. These being the effects of light infused voluntarily and naturally by native institutions, and not proceed- ing from a system introduced by a foreign power professing a hostile creed, would pass away. ‘That wretched state of the human mind—wnbelief—a state of negation and vacuity, which nature abhors, will not last more than a generation, if left to the voluntary operation of natural laws and the voluntary action of religious truth. Besides, if the provisions of the Despatch were carried out, we have the best reason to anticipate a rapid in- crease of the numbers attending the mission colleges, which are every year gaining more and more the con- fidence of the natives. The positive inculcation of true religion and sound principles of social order by disinte- rested parties, would lead to the most beneficial results. L: awh | THE FOLLOWING ARE SOME OF THE ADVANTAGES TO BE GAINED BY FAITHFULLY CARRYING OUT THE PROVISION OF THE DeEsPpAatcH oF 1854, As ADVOCATED IN THE FOLLOWING PAGES. Ist. It would free the Government in India from a false position, in tacitly sanctioning the evasion, and in some cases the open violation by their own “ Direc- tors of Public Instruction” of the rules laid down for the education of the people, and it would deliver our home Government from the sin and folly of allowing the spread of discontent and disloyalty in its name. 2nd. It would lead to the gradual withdrawal of large sums now needlessly lavished on the higher education of the rich, and their employment in the much needed elementary instruction of the poor. 3rd. It would encourage self-reliance and independ- ence in the upper classes of society, and foster the spirit of beneficence amongst both natives and Kuro- peans in the support of institutions for the higher education — of themselves an important part of a nation’s education. 4th. By substituting more largely the grant-in-aid, for durect Government instruction, they would greatly increase the means at their disposal for extending education in all its departments, without increasing the demands on the Government exchequer—at present not in a condition to be more largely drawn upon. 5th. It would free the higher Aided-Institutions from that unhealthy competition which now greatly hinders their influence for the moral and religious good of the youth of India, and it would vastly increase the sphere of their usefulness, without increasing the cost of their maintenance. In fact, the higher educa- B4 [fs ae | tion might ere long become largely self-supporting. Some of the higher schools have now reached that happy consummation. 6th. It would prepare the way for education being put on a better and safer platform. Without lowering the standard for a few of the élite of the youth of India, the course of instruction for the many could be much better adapted to the present state of Indian culture. Tor the “high pressure ” of © which Lord Lytton and many of the wisest educators have complained —a system of STIMULANTS which Asiatic minds would be better without, and of cramming which only clogs the brain with food it cannot assimilate, there might be substituted a system broader and deeper, fitted to give sobriety and solidity to the reasoning powers, to revive and strengthen the moral faculties, and to impart purity and life to the spiritual nature. For these and other ends which might be secured, I earnestly and reasonably hope for a careful perusal of the following pages. Tam thankful to have the honoured name of the author of the Despatch on which our educational policy was based a quarter of a century ago, on the title-page to secure attention. I trust to the accuracy of my statements, and the soundness of my inferences, to secure the confidence of my readers, and through their influence the honest fulfilment of its wise provisions. OUR EDUCATIONAL POLICY IN INDIA. SEN I ER. tase I PROPOSE to treat briefly of the educational methods by Object in which the Government of our country has sought, to bestow ~"""* the benefits of a higher civilisation, and the Church of Christ, to confer the still higher blessings of Christianity on our empire in India, to show what the results of those methods have been, and to call attention to certain changes, in the present modes of procedure, which seem essential to the attainment of the important ends desired by the Church and the Government. The subject is both important and urgent. It bears directly on the highest wellbeing of two hundred millions of our fellow-subjects, it involves the stability of our empire in India, it affects the higher interest of the kingdom of God. : A BRIEF HISTORICAL SKETCH. There are three periods of our history in India which Three periods, may be characterised by their appropriate symbols—the ell- wand, the sword, and the sceptre. The first, or mercantile, which still continues an important feature, had an imperial style and stamp upon it from the first, and the military character of our rule, which has existed side by side with the earliest adventures of commerce, is still painfully prominent in the third period of settled government; still, as we shall show, there is a marked predominance of the three characteristics, trade, conquest, and legislation, at the periods referred to. First Pertiop.—TRADE. For about a hundred years trade was the special, we may East India say the exclusive, object of the East India Company.* By Coma": * Appendix A. The Company afflicted with earth-hunger. Trade tribute. 2 the habits of its members, as well as the nature of its con- stitution, it could not be otherwise. It is expressly laid down in the original charter, that the Company was to con- sist of merchants only. In the language of the period, “no gentlemen were to be members of the Company,” and so tenacious were the ‘Governor and Company” of this feature of their charter, that when the Court party wished to give the command of the first fleet of merchantmen to Sir Edward Michelborne, they refused his services on the ground of his being a gentleman, saying they ‘“ would sort their business with men of their own quality.” Until the end of the seventeenth century gain was the great pursuit. It is not pleasant to look back upon the means employed for the attamment of their sordid ends, and it is not my intention to form an estimate of the character of the men, or the morality of their commercial transactions. The ex- tension of trade, protection of their monopoly, and large profits were the ends they never lost sight of, and which they pursued with a courage, sagacity, and perseverance worthy of the highest aims of moral agents—the pursuit of virtue, the good of men. SECOND PERIOD.—CONQUEST. It was not until the year 1689 that the East India Com- pany entered on a new line of policy. In that year we find them openly aspiring to independent authority in the East. In the language of Mr. Mill, ‘‘ It was then laid down as a determined object of policy that independence was to be established in India, and dominion acquired.” At that date they wrote to their agents: ‘The increase of our revenue is the subject of our care as much as our trade.” They resolved to be “a nation in India,” and held up to their servants the example of the Dutch, who, they say, in sending advices to their governors, “wrote ten paragraphs regarding tribute for one relative to trade.” This tribute they evidently looked on not as a revenue for the maintenance of a government ruling for the benefit of the people, but as a new and fruitful source of profit to the Company. Conquest was sought, not from motives of ambition, that “infirmity of noble minds;” but from the 3 lower and more degrading infirmity—the love of money. It is true that ambitious men often got the power into their own hands, and aimed at conquest more for its own sake than for the material advantages to be gained; and what seemed incidental circumstances often led to wars which were far from profitable to the Company. A mysterious AhigherPower hand seemed to lead them on from one war of defence or !°4s- aggression to another, until by the end of another century the trading Company had become masters of an empire more populous than that of Alexander or the Cesars. Up to this time we can trace no well-defined, far less systematic, plans for the benefit of India. Great generals, able gover-. nors, good men did appear and strove hard to introduce beneficent plans for the government of the country or the benefit of portions of it over which they had control; but the system was adverse to any great or beneficent measures, a selfish policy of gain and aggrandisement was the order of the day. THIRD PERIOD.—LEGISLATION. It was not until about the beginning of the present century that we find a clear and decisive change in the policy of the Company; and that originated not from within, but from without. It was in the British Parliament that the change was effected. The charter of the Company had to be renewed every Responsibility twenty years, and new powers were claimed by Parliament pices as the possessions of this imperial trading corporation in- creased; a sense of responsibility began to manifest itself in the Legislature when the subject was discussed in 1793. It was not, however, until the renewal of the charter in 1813 that the conscience of the country was really aroused to a sense of the solemn obligations which our great power and vast territories in India imposed. It was to a small body of men that we owe the begin- The “Clapham ning of a new era in our relations with India—a compact °°” phalanx of true patriots, whose greatness arose from the soundness of their moral principles and the purity of their motives, and whose power sprang from the strength of their convictions. The same noble band of men who achieved Charter of 1813. Our responsi- bility national and personal, 4 the emancipation of the slaves in the West Indies, were the means of introducing into East India sound principles of government and the blessings of education and religion. The contest was keen, but what the wisdom and experi- ence of Grant and the eloquence of Wilberforce failed to obtain in 1793 was secured in 1813. The movement in the - direction of a higher moral tone in the government of India, and a desire to improve the condition of the people, to liberate them from many of their own barbarous and immoral customs, and to free the government from sinful complicity in the idolatrous practices of the heathen, were greatly aided by the writings of Claudius Buchanan, the son of a Scotch schoolmaster, under the patronage of distinguished Indian statesmen such as Lord Wellesley and Lord Minto. Buch- anan was sent out by Mr. Henry Thornton, one of the leaders of the ‘Clapham men,’ as a chaplain to the Company. From the year 1781 the Legislature had been asserting its right to a voice in the government of India, at first through one of the responsible advisers of the Crown, and a few years after by a ‘Board of Control,” and in 1793 several members of the Privy Council were placed upon the “Board” with large powers in all matters of imperial policy. In 1813 the monopoly of the trade with India was abolished, and that with China followed in 1823. In fact, “the Company” as a body of traders practically ceased to exist. Instead of each of its members and servants, as at first, being of the trading class, none of the employees of the Government are now allowed to engage in trade on their own account, and as one consequence of this change of policy, the character of the service has from that time gone on in the march of improvement, and for many years the public servants of the Crown in India have been as distin- guished for honour, justice, and benevolence as they had always been for talent, energy, and courage. It is not, however, my intention to describe the nature of the new charter or the effects of its operation. I refer to the change for two reasons. First, to call attention to the fact, that the nation has been from that time responsible for the government of o India, and, that we are individually responsible for the action of our Government in the East, as well as at home,—that we cannot escape from our obligation for national sins and duties towards our fellow-subjects in India. We are all the more under moral obligations to our Government fellow-subjects in India from the fact, that they have no aaa a representative voice in the choice of their rulers. They are still, and for many a day must continue to be, governed as a conquered race. Our government is paternal in form, we Should be are the more bound to see that it is paternal in character. ee as The position of our country as a Christian nation, with the destiny of two hundred millions of an alien race in our hands, is the most solemn ever assigned by an overruling Providence to any nation upon earth. This sense of respon- sibility is intensified by the consideration, that these millions of our fellow-subjects are nearly all Muhammadan or ‘heathen. | My second reason, for calling attention to the change in Reform must the relation of the Legislature to the people of India, is to ai aibahe pets arrest attention on this other fact, that the most important and beneficent measures for the amelioration and improve- ¢ ment of the condition of the native of India have been carried out by the Home Government. Great and good men in India have originated and planned most valuable measures, but under the old régime they were comparatively powerless to carry them into effect. The interests of trade and profits stood in the way, and blinded the eyes of the Directors to any change merely for the benefit of the native. But since the establishment of the “ Board of Control” in 1793, and by more recent measures, Parliament have taken the reins into their own hands, there is a desire to rule for the higher and unselfish ends of government. The heart and conscience of the nation have, to a large extent, been reached, and do now sincerely seek the good of India. If the attention of the Government and the sympathy of Parliament can be fixed on any real grievance, there is a fair prospect of its removal; and, convince our rulers at home of any obvious benefit to be sought by legislation, and if practicable, there is hope that it will be conferred. Under the old rule in India a deaf ear was turned to any change Obstructions in India. Improvement must originate at home. Character of third period. Higher tone. 6 purely in the interest of the native population; and even now it is difficult to carry out some of the most important measures that have been passed into law, owing to the obstructions put in the way of the Administration in India, by the prejudices of natives and a few of the old residents, and still more by the host of vested interests and selfish claims which spring up like the rank weeds of the tropics, and choke the good seed of benevolent legislation. It is in this country that Indian questions must be taken up, and it is by the Houses of Parliament that measures roust be carried, and their execution vigilantly watched. With the assistance of the able and experienced members of the Council for India, it can be most advantageously done. In saying this, I make no reflection on the disinterestedness and benevolence of the Government in India, Their position and circumstances are such that they often cannot carry out their best schemes. Like all local governing bodies, they are at a disadvantage; on the one hand, subject to the authority of the Home Government, and, on the other, exposed to the obstructions or the influence of interested parties, or the clamour and opposition of the discontented on the spot. We know the difficulties of local governments in our own country, on a small scale, and among an enlightened people. It is far worse there, amidst a host of ignorant and excitable natives, easily led by a handful of clever agitators. It isa real kindness in the Government and Council in this country, to limit and guide the Government and Council in India. This third period is one in which the ages of commercial adventure and military conquest are dominated by a higher and nobler spirit than those which preceded it—a spirit by no means tame or unambitious, but, on the whole, a more peaceable and less aggressive age—an age in which war was more of a necessity for the sake of peace, or what might perhaps be thought a more secure frontier. Commerce may have become less dignified when deprived of the stately crutches of monopoly, and the keen edge of a cutting com- petition may bave lowered her moral tone. The military spirit has not been at rest, and legislative measures have been far from satisfactory. Still, no one can dispassionately read the history of our rule in India, from the beginning 7 of the present century, without feeling that he is in the Measures. presence of a high-minded and earnest race of men, seeking to fulfil the grave responsibilities laid upon them by the possession of such an empire. After a careful perusal of many of the voluminous “ Blue Books” laid before Parliament from year to year, I can testify to an evident desire to promote the welfare of that great country committed to us by a mysterious Providence. The careful inquiries made every year into the state of the Careful over- country, as to its “material and moral progress,” and the “8 working of its educational institutions, the minute and elaborate reports with statistical tables, drawn up with great labour, are unmistakable evidences of an earnest solicitude for the general welfare of the country, worthy, in most respects, of a wise and paternal government. If from measures we turn to the men who have governed Character of India, we are struck by the large number in every depart- ?™?!¢™ ment, civil and military, who distinguished themselves, and shed a lustre on our country by their character and deeds— to name them all would crowd our pages, to name a few would be invidious. The highest moral and intellectual . powers of true manhood have been illustrated by them on a stage so conspicuous, and a scale so large, that they have not only benefited vast multitudes by their noble deeds, but have fired the imagination and roused the emulation of the youth of our country. Our rule in India has enlarged the views and stimulated the virtues of our rulers and our people. | The one grand error which has vitiated almost all our A fundamental relations to the people of India, and to which my subject a requires that I call attention, is our neglecting to acknowledge God in the government of that country—worse than neglect, our deliberate and persistent determination not to honour the God of heaven in our official acts, not even in the educa- tion of the people. I frankly admit the difficulty of the position. It would have required great faith as well as great courage, in the little band of adventurers who first laid the foundation of our empire—a mere handful in the presence of an over- whelming host of fanatical idolaters, or still more fanatical 8 Muhammadans—to proclaim their determination to rule in the name of the one God of the Christian, and to regulate their government by the principles of His sacred Book. Though I am convinced, that even then, their character would have been more respected, and their rule more trusted by the heathen, had they frankly declared their faith and Difficulty principles. I also admit that when our Home Government admitted. took the direct responsibility for the government of India into their own hands, they were hampered by the legacy of that rule, and the practice and precedent of so many years’ standing. An oppor- The revolt of 1857, which cancelled unrighteous obliga- tunity missed. tions, abolished dual government, and led to direct imperial rule, was a grand opportunity for a reversal of the vicious policy of their predecessors, while the open proclamation of its continuance, turned, that which had been formerly the offence of individuals, or the errors of a Company, into a national sin, and an imperial injury to India.* A Government surrounded by and ruling over a vast population, which had been accustomed to perform every act, whether good or bad, private or public, in the name of a God, was placed in a false and perilous position by its neutrality. The Hindu invoked his god at all times, and in everything he did; and his rulers, whether native or foreign, heathen or Muhammadan, ruled in the name of their god. The native could not understand any other basis or authority for government than the Divine. To assert authority on the ground of mere force or military superiority was a deeper degradation to him. With his primitive notions, he would have preferred to be ruled by a people whose God had given them power to subdue them; and if the government exercised in His name, had been from the first wise and tolerant and just, we would have gained his obedience and respect, if not his affection and confidence. Nota practical But this, I fear, is not now a practical question. It is vain eet pe Oe hope for any radical and beneficial change in present cir- cumstances. It would now excite a not unreasonable suspicion to introduce a change, without some adequate and obvious grounds for an alteration of policy. Circum- * See Appendix B. 9 stances may arise to justify such a step, but as I cannot see how they can arise, except through another revolt, or some justification of a great display of our power, and a call for a fresh proclamation of our authority, I dare neither desire nor advocate such a change. I could not avoid asserting the principle, both because it is sound in policy, and Gicartel = its bearing on the question of education. The want of a Divine authority, and a sacred rule of action Want of a Divine autho- to appeal to, became painfully manifest when Government, rity, rule, and under a sense of its responsibility, took steps to elevate the ™°4ve- moral as well as the intellectual condition of the people. This came out in the despatches of the earlier half of the present century. We have an illustration of this want of an adequate rule and motive in adespatch of the Court of Directors of 1827. They dwelt ‘ on the importance of raising up educated natives of high moral character for the discharge of public duties.” They say: “To this, the last and highest object of educa- tion, we expect that a large share of your attention will be applied. We desire that the discipline of these [educational] institutions may be mainly directed towards raising among . the students that rational self-esteem. which is the best security against degrading sins; and we particularly direct that the greatest pains may be taken to create habits of veracity and fidelity, by inspiring the youth with a due sense of their importance, and by distinguishing, with the approbation of Government or its discontinuance, those who do, or do not, possess these qualifications.” Now, nothing could be better than the aim of this despatch and the intentions of the Directors. To elevate the moral character, to inculcate veracity and fidelity, to bestow rewards on the upright, and withdraw them from the dishonest, are most important. We applaud the aims and honour the Directors for their good intentions. But mark the utter inadequacy of means to the end. There is no moral standard to appeal to, no Divine authority to overawe or encourage, no future rewards beyond the temporary salaries of the inferior offices in the Company’s service. They cannot quote the purer portions of the Shastras, the better portions of the Koran, nor the sacred Poor substi- tutes. The system a failure. Historical sketch from 1813. 10 words of Scripture—that would be teaching religion. They dare not appeal to the authority of the many gods of heathen- ism, the one God of Islam, nor the Triune God of Christianity —that would be theology. Their system shuts them out from an appeal to the rewards and punishments of a future state. The transmigrations of the Hindu, the paradise of the Muhammadan, and the heaven of the Christian are all excluded as beyond the prescribed region of the secular instruction to which they have limited the entire circle of knowledge. The only standard to which they can direct the youth ot India is a ‘‘ RATIONAL SELF-ESTEEM,” which they declare is “ the bestsecurityagainst degrading vices.” The only motives to virtuous action are hope of the rewards of Government service, and the fear of their withdrawal. In other words, self-esteem is made to take the place of conscience. “The Company ” takes the place of a personal Divine Providence, and the payment or withdrawal of paltry wages are to be the rewards and punishments of the educated natives of India, Is it surprising that such a system of education should fail? That the ‘rational self-esteem” should in the great majority of cases develop itself in the form of intolerable self-conceit; and that ‘John Coompany,” as this new divinity was irreverently called by the precocious youths who had been emancipated from all faith in the more formidable gods of their fathers, should be regarded as a usurper or imposter,—his rewards, when bestowed, received without gratitude, and when withheld his authority despised and his government hated ? When such principles are adopted, and such a position assumed, by a company of merchants, however respectable, it excites contempt or ridicule; when accepted by a Christian government it calls forth a deep sense of humiliation and sorrow. INTRODUCTION AND INFLUENCE OF GOVERNMENT EDUCATION, It is desirable that we briefly sketch the origin, the diffu- sion, and results of the Government education in India. In renewing the charter in 1813, Parliament required, 11 in addition to many material advantages conferred on the natives, and religious privileges given to the Christian Church and to the British residents in India, that the modest sum of £10,000 should be devoted by the Company to the encouragement of education. This sum was expended partly in improving and extending the higher vernacular education of the natives, and still more in encouraging the study of the Eastern classics——Sanscrit, Arabic, and Persian —and in the translation of scientific and classic works from the English into the vernacular languages of India. At the commencement of that period the use of English as a medium of education was not thought of. The origin of the idea of using the English language as Origin of the a means of educating the youth of India, and introducing Pe them to the rich treasures of the Western literature— 88° treasures greater far than the gold and precious stones of India, which for centuries fired the imagination and excited the cupidity of Europe, for some time baffled inquiry. I looked for some great genius as the founder of such a system, and for profound philosophic principles on which its founda- tion had been laid, but looked in vain. It was not until long after the system had been in practice, and its influ- ence felt, that philosophers discussed it, and Government adopted it. From missionary notices, it appeared that in 1818 the Serampore Mission established a school for teaching English to the natives of India, without requiring their attendance on religious exercises, and in the same year Dr. Inglis, who was the founder of educational missions, preached a sermon in Edinburgh, in which he urged the adoption of the English language as the means for attracting the Hindus, and bringing them under the influence of the Gospel. On further imquiry, however, it was apparent that while the employment of English as a moral or missionary agency in India was first used or advocated by Marshman and Inglis, the discovery was made, like many great discoveries, by a seeming accident, but what was in reality the carrying out of the simple law of supply and demand. There had long been a felt need for a knowledge of English by the natives, for the sake of employment in English families and warehouses, and Mr. Hare’s school. A native scholar’s re- collections, 12 as the prospect of service of a humble kind in Government offices opened up, the demand increased. It was in this state of matters that a benevolent watch- maker in Calcutta, of the name of Hare, taking pity on the many half-caste children who were growing up in ignorance and depravity, neglected by their unnatural fathers, and cast off by native society, to which their mothers belonged, which had no place for them in its rigid system of caste, opened a free school for their instruction. Mr. Hare at first received only these outcast Eurasian children, but as they formed a connecting link with the Hindus, it led to earnest applica- tion for admission on the part of the natives, to which he generously responded. ‘The system spread in Calcutta, and was soon introduced into the other cities where any con- siderable body of English residents were settled. The origin and progress of the study of the English language is graphically described by one who is himself an illustrious example of what education can do for the Hindu, when the study of literature and science is based on moral principle and Christian truth, resulting in his case, not only in the highest culture, but in Christian character. The Rev. Lal Behari Day, in his “ Recollections of Dr, Duff,” repeats the old story of the dhobi, or washerman, who was the first to acquire a few English words when washing the linen of a ship’s company 1n1634,and to teach them to his countrymen, “In 1774,” he says, ‘‘a stimulus was given to a desire for English amongst respectable Bengalis by the establishment of the Supreme Court in Calcutta, but the only aids to the study were one or two spelling-books or vocabularies of very limited extent.” ‘ In course of time,” he goes on to say, “some Eurasians in Calcutta lent their services to the cause of native education, They went to the houses of rich Baboos and gave instruction in English. They received pupils into their own houses, which they turned into schools. Under the auspices of these men the curriculum of studies was en- larged. To the ‘Spelling Book’ and the ‘Schoolmaster’ were added the ‘ Tales of a Parrot,’ the ‘ Elements of English Grammar,’ and the ‘Arabian Nights’ Entertainments.’ The man who could read and understand the last-mentioned book was reckoned in those days a prodigy of learning. 13 “The year 1817 is a memorable time in the history of English education in Bengal. In that year the Hindu College was established. The honour of originating that institution belongs to David Hare, a watchmaker in Calcutta. The rough plan which he had sketched of the institution fell into the hands of Sir Edward Hyde East, then Chief Justice of the Supreme Court in Calcutta, who liked the proposal, and took measures for reducing it to practice. This institution, which was at first a school of very humble character, rose into a college chiefly through the exertions of the great Sanscrit scholar, Horace Hayman Wilson, who was Secretary to the Committee of Public Instruction, appointed in 1823 by Government. The success of the Hindu College induced some native gentlemen to set up private schools, the most eminent of which was the Oriental Seminary. The attainments of the youths attending these schools, but especially the Hindu College, were considerable. They were familiar with the historical works of Hume, Robertson, and Gibbon; with the economic works of Adam Smith and Jeremy Bentham; with the philosophical works of Locke, Reid, and Dugald Stewart; and with the poetry of Shakespeare, Milton, Dryden, Pope, Burns, and Scott. “Such was the state of English education when Duff reached Calcutta in 1830.” The demand for education increased with the openings made for employment in the public works which the Govern- ment began in the earlier part of the present century to carry on for the material benefit of the country. And when the Government offices and Civil Service were thrown open, in certain departments, to the natives, the spur of ambition was added to the love of gain, to intensify the already strong desire to acquire English, which was not only the key of knowledge, but the door to wealth and honour in the eyes of the poor and down-trodden races of India. The arrival of Alexander Duff in Calcutta in the year Dr. Duf’s 1830 formed a new era in education and in missions in" India. Though the founder of neither, his methods were as original as they were important. His clear judgment saw the true significance of the state of society in the capital. His intrepid spirit at once entered on an independent line Introduction of religion. en et 14 of action, different from that of his predecessors, and the many good and honoured men who were at work around him. In direct opposition to the letter of his instructions from the committee which sent him out, instead of going as directed to some quiet rural district of the country, or employing the English language as a mere educational pro- cess, as had been done by Mr. Hare and the Government, or introducing timidly a little religion at a stated hour when the heathen were at liberty to absent themselves, as was then done, even in missionary institutions, he gave it distinctly to be understood that he was a religious teacher, that his great aim was the conversion of the pupils, and that educa- tion, with all its importance, was only a means to a higher end—the formation of the character and the salvation of the soul. But while education was only a means to an end, he manifested his sense of its importance, and with all his charac- teristic fervour and indomitable energy, he set himself to adapt a system of instruction so thorough and perfect, that within a few months Duff’s school was the wonder and admiration of Calcutta. And, in a short time, so far superior to all competitors, that in spite of the dread of his fervent piety and proselytising zeal, his school was the largest and most popular in the Presidency, and himself the most admired and loved of all the teachers in Calcutta. In. 1833, when Indian affairs came for their periodical consideration before Parliament, the conscience of our country again demanded and obtained great advantages for India, and, amongst others, a great increase of money erants for education, which now began to assume a charac- _ ter of imperial importance. The grant of £10,000 in 1813 English versus vernacular languages. was increased tenfold, and great interest was excited in the question as to the best way of imparting to the natives of India the full light of western science and literature. Now burst forth in earnest the smouldering controversy between the advocates of the vernacular and English languages, as / the medium of instruction. Into that controversy I cannot | now enter. It is deserving of, and will demand, earnest’ ‘reconsideration on an early day. Without going the length to which the “Orientalists” went, there is an important 15 principle at the base of the position occupied by such men as James and Thoby Princep, Shakespeare, and _ others, which must assert itself sooner or later. The importance of English cannot be over-estimated, if it be kept in its proper place, and within due limits. These have been of late overstepped, and there are symptoms of a natural reaction, which will require to be watched lest it be carried too far in the opposite direction. It is, however, with facts, not principles, we have now to do. The battle between the advocates of the Oriental and _ English languages was carried on both within and outside the Council Chamber. In this contest the eloquence, and still more, the practical work of Dr. Duff were of great service ; but the tide was not turned until the arrival of a powerful ally in the person of Thomas Babington Macaulay. There seemed a providence in the way Mr. Macaulay had Macaulay’s been raised up for his work in India. The son of as pure ne and devoted a Christian patriot as ever toiled for the poor and oppressed of our race, and trained under the influence of the “ Clapham Sect,” of which his father, Zachary,* was the hidden spring, Mr. Macaulay was prepared to take an enlightened and generous view of any question affecting the interests of the natives. The “minute” drawn up by him in 1835, now an Eng- lish classic rather than an official paper, put an end to contro=> versy, and introduced a new policy. From that date the English language has been the great subject of study in Government schools and cclleges, and the medium through which all the higher branches of study are carried on. While the native classic and vernacular languages are taught, not only English literature and history, but all the sciences, and even mathematics, in which the Hindus had long excelled, are taught by English teachers in the English tongue. For twenty years this method went on increasing in efficiency and extent, and so popular is it with the natives that they required to be urged to study their own vernaculars, and it needs a bribe to get them to attend the old endowed classes for Sanscrit, Arabic, or Persian. * See Appendix C, on Zachary Macaulay. C3 16 DESPATCH OF 1854. We are now arrived at the most important period of our educational policy in India, and this was another proof of Importance of the importance of having the affairs of that country brought sceacpeaeets before Parliament in such a form as to fix on our Eastern en ques- empire that earnest attention which calls into lively exercise the intelligence and conscience of the nation. Now that the necessity for a renewal of the charter every twenty years no longer exists, it is almost impossible to get the House of Commons to listen to a debate on the most important questions affecting the welfare of the two hundred millions of our Eastern empire. Nothing less than a war which demands millions of our gold to carry it on, or a famine, by which millions of lives are carried off, will secure a hearing, and these are times which call for special shifts and tem- porary expedients, not for large and comprehensive measures. The periodic revisions of the charter, especially since the end of last century, were in reality eras in the history of our rule in India. That for 17938 sanctioned, besides material benefits, important religious advantages. These were much extended in 1813, when the first grant for education was made. In 18383 this grant was raised tenfold; and in 1853 a principle was laid down which extended it indefinitely, and in actual outlay has raised it seven or eight fold. Had the whole question been raised in a similar way in 18738, we doubt not the results would have been of equal importance and advantage to that country. es 2 I give in the Appendix a summary of the famous de- despatch. spatch of 1854, issued for the Government by Sir Charles Wood (Viscount Halifax),* and shall now call attention to some of its more important features. The first 1s one which To extend the evidently formed a main ground for the new legislation— tere ot. viz, TO ENLARGE THE circle OF STUDY BY INTRODUCING A GREATER NUMBER OF USEFUL SUBJECTS INTO THE HIGHER DEPARTMENTS, AND TO EXTEND THE sphere OF EDUCATION SO AS TO REACH THE LOWER CLASSES OF SOCIETY. The despatch calls attention to the fact, that up to that time the aim seemed to have been to educate a few to a very 17 high pitch of excellence, to the neglect of the general education of the people. After referring to the importance of the subject, and the advantages to be gained, section six runs thus :— Par. 6. “Aided, therefore, by ample experience of the past, and the most competent advice for the future, we are now in a position to decide upon the mode in which the assistance of Government should ‘be offered TO THE MORE EXTENDED AND SYSTEMATIC PROMOTION OF GENERAL EDUCATION in India, and on the measures which should at once be adopted to that end.” So that the extension of general education was the special aim of Government in this despatch which introduced the new policy. This view is confirmed by the tenth paragraph, which is as follows :— Par. 10. ‘‘ We have also received most satisfactory evidence of the ligh attainments in English literature and European science, which have been acquired of late years by some of the natives of India. But this success has been confined to but a small number of persons ; AND WE ARE DESIROUS OF EXTENDING FAR MORE WIDELY THE MEANS OF ACQUIRING GENERAL HUROPEAN KNOWLEDGE, OF A LESS HIGH ORDER, but of such a character as may be practically useful to the people of India in their different spheres of life. To attain this end it is necessary, for the reasons which we have given above, that they should be made familiar with the works of Euro pean authors, and with the results of the thought and labour of Europeans on the subjects of every description upon which know- ledge is to be imparted to them; and to extend the means of imparting this knowledge must be the object of any general system of education.” To remove any doubt as to this being the aim of the Home Government, I quote the following from the thirty- ninth paragraph :— Par. 39. “ . . . The wise abandonment of the early views with regard to native education, which erroneously pointed to the classical languages of the East as the media for imparting European knowledge, together with the small amount of pecuniary aid which in the then financial condition of India was at your command, has ded, we think, to too exclusive a direction of the efforts of Govern- Colleges aided by grants to supersede Government colleges, 18 ment towards providing the means of acquiring A VERY HIGH DEGREE OF EDUCATION for a small number of natives of India, drawn for the most part from what we should here call the higher classes.” Paragraph fifty-two shows that the extension of the higher education in future is to be carried out, not by increasing the number of Government colleges, but by the system of grants-in-aid now for the first time introduced. Par. 52, “ We have, therefore, resolved to adopt in India the system of grants-in-aid which has been carried out in this country with very great success; and we confidently anticipate by thus drawing support from local resources, in addition to contributions from the State, a far more rapid progress of education than would follow a mere increase of expenditure by the Government; while it possesses the additional advantage of fostering a spirit of reliance upon local exertions and combinations for local purposes, which is of itself of no mean importance to the wellbeing of a nation.” To show that the Government intended to encourage missionary colleges and schools as well as those supported by natives and resident Europeans, the following tribute is paid to their labours in the past :— Par. 50. ‘At the same time, in so far as the noble exertions of societies of Christians of all denominations to guide the natives of India in the way of religious truth, and to instruct uncivilised races, . . . have been accompanied, in their educational establish- ments, by the diffusion of improved knowledge, they have largely contributed to the spread of that education which it is our object . to promote.” In confirmation of our interpretation of the intention of Government, we quote the following from paragraph eighty- S1X :— Par. 86. “ . .. We confidently expect that the introduction of the system of grants-in-aid will very largely increase the number of schools of a superior order; and we hope that before long sufficient provision may be found to exist in many parts of the country for the education of the middle and higher classes, inde- pendent of the Government institutions, which may then be closed as has been already the case in Burdwan in consequence of the enlightened conduct of the Raja of Burdwan, or they may be transferred to local management.” 19 This shows that the Home Government not only looked | to the system of grants-in-aid as a means of saving the Indian Government from spending more on the extension of the higher education than they had been expending up to that time, but that it would lead to the lessening of that expense by the withdrawal of some of the colleges then an exrstence. That this is the right interpretation of the despatch 1s placed beyond a doubt by the paragraphs sixty-one and sixty-two, which we must quote in full, We do not even take the liberty of altering the type as we have done in some other quotations :— Par. 61. “ We desire to see local management under Government inspection, and assisted by grants-in-aid, taken advantage of where- ever it is possible to do so, and that no Government colleges or schools shall be founded for the future in any district where a sufficient number of institutions exist capable, with assistance from the State, of supplying the local demand for education. But in order fully to carry out the views we have expressed with regard to the adequate provision of schools throughout the country, it will probably be necessary for some years to supply the wants of particular parts of India by the establishment, temporary sup- port, and management of places of education of every class, in districts where there is little or no prospect of adequate local efforts being made for this purpose, but where, nevertheless, they are urgently required.” Mark the explicit expression of the desire for local volun- tary effort, and the caution with which any extension of higher instruction is allowed. It will only “ probably ” be required in any case, and it is only when “urgently required” that it is to be allowed, and even in such an ex- treme case it is only to be “temporary support” that is to be given. Par, 62. “We would look forward to a time, when any general system of education, entirely provided by Government, may be dis- continued with the gradual advance of the system of grants-in-aid, and when many of the existing Government institutions, especially those of the higher order, may be safely closed, or transferred to the management of local bodies under the control of and aided by the State ; but it is far from our wish to check the spread of edu- Local effort with grants-ine aid desired. Professional or technical instruction. General col- leges—two classes. 20 cation in the slightest degree, by the abandonment of a single school to probable decay, and we therefore entirely confide in your discre- tion, and in that of the different local authorities, while keeping this object steadily in view, to act with caution, and to be guided by special reference to the particular circumstances which affect the demand for education in different parts of India.” This needs no comment. I would only ask a second perusal of the first half of this paragraph. The aim, then, is, while keeping up the standard for a few, to “extend far more widely the means of acquiring a general European knowledge OF A LESS HIGH ORDER,” but practically useful in every-day life. By way of enlarging the circle of study, it is proposed to introduce technical or professional schools and colleges for the study of medicine, law, engineering, industry and design, and agriculture; and by way of extending the sphere, arrange- ments are made for establishing normal schools for the educating and training of native teachers for elementary and middle schools. In fact, the spirit of the despatch breathes a generous desire to extend the benefits of a useful educa- tion to the whole country, instead of limiting it to a favoured few in the large cities, as had been done previously. In paragraph forty, after having called attention to the too exclusive regard hitherto paid to the education of a few of the higher class, they justly say :— “The higher classes are both able and willing, in many cases, to bear a considerable part, at least, of the cost of their education.” The establishment of general colleges was no part of the scheme of the despatch. These were in existence before, and were of two kinds; first, ‘‘ Government colleges ;” and by that must be understood something entirely unlike any- thing known in this country. They are built with Govern- ment money, supported by Government funds, the professors are appointed by Government, and all the arrangements are under Government authority. The pupils pay a fee of from ten to twelve rupees a-month, which goes but a little way towards the expenses of institutions which are carried on in an imperial style, and at great expense. The other colleges are supported by endowments or 21 voluntary subscriptions, from every class and denomination in the country, native and foreign, heathen, Christian, and secularist. These voluntary or private colleges were in existence before those of the Government, but received, with a few exceptions, no Government assistance or recognition, until after the new era introduced by the despatch of 1854. One of the benefits conferred by it was ‘the en- couragement and assistance given to voluntary effort of every kind. ‘‘ Grants-in-aid” were an essential feature of the despatch. They were not only given—the prin- ciple is laid down again and again that it was the aim of Government to foster liberality on the part of in- dividuals and societies, and to encourage the spirit of independence and self-reliance in the natives, as of itself an important part of education. Not only so, but they declare repeatedly that it shall be a part of their plan to withdraw from the field as soon as adequate agencies can be raised up for carrying on the higher education, and to devote the money so saved to the extension of education in the rural districts, and amongst the poorer classes. UNIVERSITIES ESTABLISHED FOR THE ENCOURAGEMENT OF PRIVATE COLLEGES, SUPPORTED BY LOCAL AND MIs- SIONARY RESOURCES AND ‘‘ GRANTS-IN-AID.” The establishment of the universities had a direct bearing The univer- on this part of their scheme, and was designed to encourage aereinese: undependent effort, and to prepare the way for Government ins bodies. withdrawing from the costly work of direct education. In paragraph forty they say :— Par. 40. “We have, by the establishment and support of these colleges, pointed out the manner in which a liberal education is to be obtained, and assisted them to a very considerable extent from the public funds. In addition to this we are now prepared to give, by sanctioning the establishment of universities, full development to the highest course of education to which the natives of India or of any other country can aspire; and besides, by the division of university degrees and distinctions into other branches, the exertions of highly-educated men will. be directed to the studies which are necessary to success in the various active professions of Despatch of 1863. Stanley’s despatch of 1859. 22 life. We shall, therefore, have done as much as Government can do to place the benefits of education plainly and practically before the higher classes in India.” That this was their design is made clear by the following ‘“‘ Extract from the Proceedings of the Government of India in the Home Department,” passed on the 29th July, 1869, in which, amongst other formal resolutions, they declared that, ‘ Already the Government has gone far beyond -the intentions of the despatch of 1854, which declared THAT THE PROVISION OF UNIVERSITIES, as the examining bodies for higher education, WAS ALL THAT THEN REMAINED FOR THE GOVERNMENT TO Do.” * This feature of the Government plan of 1854 has been too much overlooked by the Executive in India, and is practically ignored by the officials of the universities and colleges. But here is the principle clearly established in 1854 and acknowledged in 1869—that universities were set up for the encouragement of private and aided colleges, and that it was the design that Government colleges should eventually give place to these. THE HoME GOVERNMENT HAS NEVER CHANGED ITS PoLicy SINCE 1854. Lest any should say that our Government has altered its policy of limiting direct teaching of the higher classes at its own expense, and directing its chief effort to extending education downwards to the more needy, where stimulus and aid were more required, let me call attention to the follow- ing official utterances, extending over many years, and which show that the policy is unchanged. In 1863, the Home Government thus expressed itself :— “Tt was one great object proposed in the despatch of the 19th July, 1854, to provide for the extension to the general population of those means of obtaining an education suitable to their station in life, which had hitherto been too exclusively confined to the higher classes; and it is abundantly clear, from Lord Stanley’s despatch of 7th April, 1859, that Her Majesty’s Government entertained at that time the same sentiments which had been * Blue Book, p. 468. 23 expressed by the home authorities in 1854... . But I think it necessary to declare that Her Majesty's Government have no intention of sanctioning a departure from the principles already deliberately laid down, and that, while they desire that the means of obtaining an education calculated to fit them for their higher position and responsibility should be offered to the upper classes of society in India, they deem it equally incumbent on the Government to take, at the same time, all suitable measures for extending the benefits of education to those classes of the community ‘who,’ as observed in the despatch of July, 1854, ‘are utterly incapable of obtaining any education worthy of the name by their own unaided efforts.” * In 1864, Sir Charles Wood wrote :— Sir Co vead in “Those principles are that, as far as possible, the resources of the State should be so applied as to assist those who cannot be expected to help themselves, and that the richer classes of the people should gradually be induced to provide for their own education.” ¢ The Duke of Argyll writes, May, 1871, to the Viceroy :— eee of Argyll, Par. 5. “I should be understood as approving generally of the main principle which runs through your despatch, that the Govern- ment expenditure should, as far as possible, be reduced with reference to the education of those who are well able to pay for themselves, and should be mainly directed to the provision of an elementary education for the masses of the people.” Par. 9. “If once we can instil into the real upper classes of India, that one of the main duties of society is to provide for the sound primary instruction of the humbler classes, we shall lay the real foundation for that general system of education which it is the desire of your Excellency’s Government to establish.” Again, on 4th June, 1873, the Duke of Argyll writes to 1873. the Viceroy :— Par. 9. “In conclusion, I must express my concurrence with your Excellency in considering that the Lieutenant-Governor (Sir George Campbell) has not departed from the broad line of educa- tional policy which has been laid down by Her Majesty’s Govern- ment during a long series of years, and in cordially approving the steps his Honour has taken to give a more practical tone to education in Bengal. The advance which has been made in the * Blue Book, 1870, p. 11. 24, encouragement of the primary instruction of the people is also a subject of congratulation.” yan Campbell, Sir George Campbell, Lieutenant-Governor of Bengal, Government colleges increased. writes to the Director of Public Instruction, 1872 :— *‘ Tt is not the policy of the Government to discourage English or high education, but it is its policy not to devote an entirely dis- proportionate amount of the funds at the disposal of the Local Government to the education of a very limited number of persons, to the comparative exclusion of the much greater number who have equal claims on the State.” But while these have been the plans of the Home Govern- ment, what has been the practice in India? Instead of withdrawing the Government colleges, they have doubled the number, and multiplied the cost. Instead of encouraging local effort, they have made the maintenance of colleges by missionary societies almost impossible, and what is, if possible, more to be deplored, they have pauperised the richer classes of the natives by leading them to depend on Government doing almost everything for them. I admit the difficulty of withdrawing from these Government colleges when the natives have got to value and use them. But this difficulty should have induced caution in establishing new ones, all the more that Government never meant the number to be increased but rather diminished. The principle ought to have been laid down that a college could only be set up in a new locality where a stimulus to the higher education was required, by giving one up where it was no longer needed, Instead of this, what do we find? In 1854 there were only fourteen general colleges sup- ported by the Government, as I find from the Blue Book, and on inquiring at the Indian Office the other day, I am favoured by the following return :— “Tn 1876-77 there were— Government colleges—General ; ., 29 %» Professional . aes | 46” It may be said with apparent truth that twenty-nine general colleges are quite insufficient for the wants of the 25 millions of India, and even if we add the seventeen aided colleges, with a total of less than 5000 graduates in all the colleges of India, what are these among so many ? Compared with the colleges in European countries, it would be miserably inadequate. But this is an inverted way of looking at the subject. We must consider the state of education in the country, the demand for the higher, and the need for-the lower culture. If the natives had developed such a system, and maintained it themselves, no one could find fault; but when the vast proportion of the attention and funds of the Imperial Treasury are devoted to fostering a fictitious culture in the higher, above the wants and habits of the people, it is both unnatural and pernicious. I know the idea prevailed that education would “ filter down” from the higher to the lower class. This, as is shown by Mr. Howell, when Under-Secretary, has proved a mere delusion and a snare. It could not but fail, when that higher culture was an exotic, taught in a foreign tongue, and by foreign teachers. There is no analogy between the English language, as taught in India, and the Latin tongue, as used on the revival of learning in Europe; and even it failed to reach the body of the people, although the priesthood read it, and the people heard it in the daily services of the Church for cen- uries before. So much is the English system unnaturally forced, that the distinctive peculiarities of Cambridge and Oxford can be traced in the universities of Calcutta and Bombay. In the “Return” for 1870, it is said (p. 49)— “There is a difference of kind between those two univer- sities, corresponding to the difference between Cambridge and Oxford. The Calcutta University has been, I believe, chiefly moulded by Cambridge men, and the Bombay University has certainly taken its direction from a prepon- derance of Oxford men among its founders.” Is India generally educated to a position for profiting by such an exotic system of horticulture ? WoRK ACTUALLY ACCOMPLISHED IN LOWER DEPARTMENT k OF EDUCATION. I thankfully acknowledge the large amount of good which has been accomplished in the education of the lower classes Increase of Government schools, and of private schools. Abettersystem and moral tone introduced. 26 since 1854. There is a great increase in the number of children of the poorer class under direct instruction in Govern- ment schools. In 1854 there were only 40,000 youth of all classes under instruction by Government; now there are 700,000 in Government schools and colleges. In addition, they have assisted both native and missionary societies in extending their useful operations, but as there is no record of the numbers attending this class of schools before 1854, we cannot tell to what extent the grant-in-aid system has led to their numerical increase; it must have been con- siderable. Government now gives, in the form of grants-in- aid, to private schools and colleges of all classes, supported by both foreigners and natives, the sum of £133,000. I also give the present system full credit for introducing a better system of teaching, and better class-books into native schools, which are not deriving any direct benefit from grants. A higher style of teaching and better tone has been pretty largely diffused through Government example and influence. But let us look at what has been left undone, and compare the expenditure on the higher with that on the lower education,—keeping in mind that it was the object of the despatch of 1854, and has ever since been the aim of the Home Government, to extend and foster the lower and leave the higher to the influence of the universities and the resources of the richer classes. From the last returns laid before Parliament, I find the following facts. The entire sum expended from the Im- perial Treasury on, education in India in 1876-77 was £730,000. I cannot show how the whole of this sum was expended, but the following items are instructive. RETURNS FOR THE YEAR 1876-77. The number educated in the 29 General Collegesis . : 3,931 17 Special or Professional do.is 1 " 01 The Gerber attending High Schools, the feeders for College, is 97, 760 £186,694 are spent on . ; : ‘ . 32,792 of the better-off class. £85,469 are spenton.. . ; f ; * . 641,376 of the poorer class. £92,000 are spent on the 29 colleges, with . : - d,dal students. 27 The Aided Schools and Colleges, which receive from the Imperial Treasury £133,000. Educated in 19 General Colleges, : : . 1,414 students. A 25 Normal Schools for Males, . eu ood Be ” 13 p for Females, . FO) oes es 203 Schools of Higher Class, . . 36,901 pupils. rr el 3502 A Middle, . PaO OOOVI es nr 18,388 bs Lower, . ATO TTR Berit 196 Seaton Girls: } ; 42,372 1s » 1,850 Mixed Schools, i LL OO0Gs 723,785 It will be seen that the amount spent on the higher education is out of all proportion to the sum spent on the elementary, where it is far more needed. The sum £186,694 to educate highly 32,792 of the youth of India, the great majority of whom are well able to pay for their own educa- tion, while the paltry sum £85,480 is spent on 641,376 of the humbler classes, who can ill afford to pay anything, is out of all proportion. But there is another feature of this system which brings Injustice of out its positive injustice. To supplement the small amount bee ane spent on elementary instruction, a special tax is imposed for their support, which falls, directly or indirectly, chiefly on the humbler classes, while by far the greater part of the imperial funds, spent so largely on the higher education, is drawn from these same poor and neglected classes.* It adds to this injustice that the higher education 1s fitted and designed to qualify the favoured richer class for lucrative employments, while the elementary gives no such advantage. The imposition of this education-tax accounts for the educa- tion of half-a-million of pupils for the sum of £85,000 from the Imperial Exchequer. The tax itself is not unreasonable, but it is hard to make the same class pay for the higher education also. * It was pointed out long ago by Col. Davidson, that it costs the Government as much to educate one rich Brahmin as to support a village school with eighty pupils. At present the Government spends £27, 9s. on the education of each of the 3331 graduates in their colleges, only a fraction of whom ever take a degree, and on each of 641,000 boys in lower and middle class schools the sum of 2s. 104d., while 14,000,000 are left uncared for. Inadequacy of means to educate. Number of the uneducated. 28 To show the inadequacy of the means as yet employed for the education of the country, let me call attention to a few facts taken from the last “ “Eg Abstract” laid before Parliament. In one of the tables is given the number of children now attending colleges and schools of all kinds of which the numbers can be given. It includes not only those attending Government schools, which was 698,877, and aided schools, numbering 820,855, but a very inferior class, which are only ‘ registered,” and not worthy of a place in such a list, of these there were 358,710. ‘Taking all, it appears that there is on the average of all India, only one institution for fourteen square miles, and nine pupils for each thousand of the population. Nota tithe of what it ought to be. In our country we expect one in six or one in seven to be at school—7.e., about 160 in the thousand. I would call special attention to the work requiring to be done in the elementary education of the poor, Taking the last returns with the latest census I find the state of matters in 1877 stands thus :— Population of British India, . ; ; . - 191,018,412 Taking one in twelve of the Botuiation as a fair proportion of those who ought to be attending elementary schools, we have, needing instruction, 15,918,201 Pupils attending Government elementary schools, . A ut SSOT700: Add number attending aida Bimontany schools, . : . 479,777 Total Government and iid sale have an attendance of 1,030,567 So that after twenty-five years of the operation of this famous and most valuable despatch, there are still MORE THAN FOURTEEN MILLIONS” OF THE CHILDREN OF BritisH INDIA, OF AGE FOR ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS, UNPROVIDED FOR BY THE GOVERNMENT. Let it not be supposed that we say all these millions are untaught. The Hindus were an educated people long before we were. | * This estimate by a missionary seems very low, only one in twelve of the population, In this country about one in six or seven is the ratio for all ages. 29 When we consider that those who may be attending Urgency of native schools without superintendence are in the vast bes majority of instances brought up in an atmosphere morally worse than if they were allowed to run wild in a state of total ignorance, we see the vast work which remains to be done, while the money wrung from the poor ryots is squandered on pet schemes, which are producing, as we shall show, very doubtful results. There are in the returns 16,882 schools, with 332,952 children, called “ unaided,” but under a very imperfect kind of supervision or registration. We cannot reckon them with the others. The great need of elementary education is well shown in pamphlets by Sir William Hill and Lieut.-Col. Davidson,— the uneducated rural population being exposed to the ruinous exactions of money-lenders, whose cruel bonds and extortionate interest they can neither read nor calculate, in addition to all the common evils of native ignorance. COMPARISON OF RESULTS IN GOVERNMENT AND AIDED ; COLLEGES. But is the large amount expended on the higher education better devoted to the Government colleges than the aided colleges ? We frankly admit that at present the Government col- leges generally show better results in the way of intellectual teaching—a greater number of students attaming the higher degrees in art and science than in the aided colleges. This is easily accounted for. The fact of their being Government institutions gives them social and political advantages in the eyes of a people like the Hindus, of which an independent Saxon can form no idea. And when we add the hope of a lucrative appointment, and the honour of Government employment, the wonder is that any colleges can compete with theirs; and yet we have the fact before us that, at the present time, the Free Church College in Madras and the Established Church College in Calcutta are more popular with the natives, and are attended by a larger number of students than those of the Government in these cities. In the Madras returns for 1877 there are 220 students in the Free Church and only 150 in the Government college, 30 and in the General Assembly College, Calcutta, for the same year the numbers were 317, the largest number in any one college in India. It is also worthy of remark that whilst the wealthier part of the population, who are able and willing to pay for education, attend in larger numbers the Government col- leges, there is very little difference in the caste and social status of those attending the different colleges. In the Report for 1870 we have the following important Tables, showing the social position of the parents of the pupils attending Government and aided colleges. For Calcutta :— SocraL Position OF THE PARENTS. Percentage on Total of Pupils. | | Zemindars,| Merchants, | ; Gort Talookdars,| Bankers, | Profes- | go vants | Shop- and Persons} Banians, sional | ond Pen- |kee DP" | Others. of Indepen- and Persons. omexn gi a dentIncome.| Brokers. ; Govt, Colleges, | 30:6 | 86 | 96 | 31-8 | 1:3 | 184 Private Colleges, | 26°6 14-4 | 11:2 | 23:2 | 1:4 | 23-2 For Madras it was :— SoctaL Position oF PARENTS. Percentage of Students. Zemindars, | Merchants, Govt Talookdars,| Bankers, | Profes- g vi t Sh and Persons} Banians, | sional and Pe id k OP- | Others. of Indepen- and Persons. eget temigt eo dentIncome.| Brokers. setae al 154 | 286 | 1:7 | 160 10°8 AG Pre ite 26°2 Govt. Colleges, 28-0 9:0 Private Colleges,| 25:0 13°3 On these Tables the Under-Secretary of Government re- marks: “As far, therefore, as this classification can be depended upon, it would appear that there is no great differ- ence in social position between the students attending Government and private colleges. And this is probably the case, but the more wealthy members of each class frequent 31 the Government colleges, while the poorer students resort to the aided colleges.” This popularity prevails in spite of the attraction of Government patronage and the supposed .disadvantage of religious teaching. Let Government withdraw from the unfair and unhealthy Time to competition in direct education, as in 1854 it promised “""™™ to do, while maintaining its universities, and soon, under the stimulus of the universities and the grant-in-aid, the natives of India, the European residents, and missionary societies, will keep up an educational system fully equal to the wants of the country, and far better fitted for training the moral and religious, as well as the intellectual, nature of the young; while it would call forth a spirit of lberality which is suppressed, and of independence which is crushed, by the present system. The Government colleges, we may admit, did good at first, in stimulating a desire for higher education, when that was needed. But now that a keen appetite is created and intellectual tastes are so highly cultivated, they may, as these reports to Government show, be advantageously withdrawn. Many of the more intelligent members of the Government, both at home and in India, admit this, and we believe steps would have been taken in this direction long ago, but for the strong prejudices of some influential men of the old school, who still distrust the natives and the missionaries, and what is perhaps more difficult to be got rid of, the strong, vested interests of the large body of professors— men who can by their social position and fluent pen influence society both abroad and at home. The grant-in-aid system has been called bya high authority, the pivot of the educational system. When there is, as at present, a loud call for retrenchment, and a louder call for the extension of elementary education, the advantages of substituting the grant-in-aid for the Government education is apparent by a reference to the comparative cost of the two systems. The significance of the tables in the Parliamentary re- ports cannot be mistaken. They call attention to the fact that for the year 1868 the cost to the Imperial Treasury D3 A comparison of Government expenditure on education and on other objects. 32 for each pupil in the Government College in Calcutta was 255 rupees ; in Patna College, it was as high as 748 rupees ; while in the following aided colleges it was— London Missionary Society oe . 109 rupees. Cathedral College, . A 6D. oe General Assembly’s Colteee, PURE. FS Key Free Church College, ; ; . 31 2? In the Bombay Presidency, 108 who matriculated at the Government colleges cost 493 rupees each for the year, while 23 who matriculated in private colleges cost them nothing. In the entire Presidency of Bengal, 701 students on the roll of all the Government colleges cost the Imperial Treasury 226 rupees each for eleven months’ instruction, while 325 on the roll of aided colleges only cost the Trea- sury.67 rupees each for the same period. If we put down to the spread of general education among the poor a fair proportion of the sum spent on directors and inspectors, and the entire sum expended on normal schools for training teachers, and on schools for the lower and middle class, it cannot amount to more than about £200,000; and this is all, with the exception of about £100,000 for grants-in-aid, that is done for carrying out the chief design of the despatch, which was to inaugurate such great things for the education of India. Take even the entire sum of £730,000 devoted to edu- cation, and what is that for such an important work in such a country, and under a paternal Government? Compare it with the immense expenditure from the Imperial Treasury for other objects. From the returns for 1877-78, we find that the ordinary expenditure was £51,430,673, and includ- ing that on ‘ Productive Public Works,” in which class education might be more accurately put than many of the public works, and working expenses of railways and canals, it was £58,178,563. Of this sum, £15,792,112 was spent on the Army, £2,158,032 on Police, £3,519,668 on ordinary public works, £3,275,821 on law and justice, more than £7,000,000 on the ‘collection of revenue,” and only £730,013 on the entire education of about 200,000,000 of a population, sunk in the grossest ignor- 39 ance and immorality and superstition; and of that, not more than about £300,000 on the most needy class. Why, the Government spent that same year £443,776 on ‘stationery and printing.” . Since the above was written, I am favoured with a copy Official Report for 1877-78,” and from it give the following Table. The report is a very able and interesting one, by the Director of Public Instruction, A. W. Croft, Esq., and manifests an enlightened interest in the spread of education among all classes. The methods used for bringing instruction down to the lower classes seem earnest and successful, but obviously need large increased grants of money, and more agents for ex- tending the organisation to the wants of the people. It will be seen that the cost of Government graduates has increased, while that of those in aided colleges is less than formerly. Statement of Number of Students attending Government and Aided Colleges in Bengal, the Number of Candidates for First Arts Hxamination, and the Number passed, with the Cost of each College and each Student to the State. : Number of Number of Received | Hach Stu- és General Colleges. Students on | from State | dent cost ee a ne Roll. Funds. State. iia resl,. : Government— Rupees. Rupees. Presidency College, 329 59,499 2124 73 31 manserit, i)! 36 14,356 495 6 2 Hioopnly, Jo... 208 32,543 230 49 19 eeCAR eS s,s 129 22,622 2264 69 14 Krishnagur,. . . 105 18,380 2354 16 3 Berhampore,. . . 39 14,840 479 13 BEE ss 5 os 108 32,381 450 51 2 RratbaGk,! 6 0-2k 0.) 1). 39 15,367 854 9 5 Rajshahye, . . . 41 Be ae ee a Midnapore, . . . 17 544 54 5 1 Chittagong, . . . 15 1888 236 oy Rungpore, ... 16 2073 172 Total, . . 1082 214,533 2704 301 94 Aided— ES ee _ ae eee OE | eee ee St. Xavier’s,. . . 105 3600 53 12 8 Free Church, . . 99 5520 754 33 13 Established Church, 333 4200 24 54 15 Cathedral Mission, 86 5520 76 30 9 Doveton)... a... 18 3000 273 3 1 London Mission, . 60 2296 56 20 10 OOGAR ): Hay. 701 24,136 55 152 56 ne nee fee ee eer ee ee ee es ee of the “General Report of Public Instruction in Bengal Bee nee Economy of grants-in-aid. An Under-Sec- retary’s view. 34 The Director calls attention to the fact, that “ For the first time in its history, or in that of any aided college, the number of students in the General Assembly’s Institution exceeds that of the Presidency College.” I would add that it is also worthy of remark that while each pupil in the Presidency College costs the Government 2124 rupees, those of the General Assembly’s College cost only twenty-four rupees each. While if we take all the Government colleges in Bengal, the cost per student is 2704 rupees, and that of the aided colleges is only fifty-five rupees. With all their disadvantages, it appears that in Bengal they yield 152 candidates for the first Arts examination against 301 from Government colleges, and fifty-six of the former pass for ninety-four of the latter; a strong proof of the economy of the grant-in-aid system, and if the system were more generously and fairly encouraged, it would soon prove its efficiency, and the wisdom of the Home Government in recommending its substitution for direct Government instruc- tion in the higher department of education. There are no official returns for the other Presidencies, but from authentic sources I am able to state that the number of students attending the Government College in Madras in 1877 was only 150, while the number in the Free Church College was 220, while the cost of the former was four times that of the latter. So that mission colleges are now more popular when fairly tried than those of Government in both — these seats of education. We close this part of our subject in the words of one intimately acquainted with the working of the educational system. Mr. A. P. Howell, formerly Under-Secretary to the Home Department in India, in a report laid before both Houses of Parliament in 1870, calls attention to the 62nd clause of the Education Despatch, and recommends its application (p. 8), and adds (p. 51): “It seems, there- fore, quite open to doubt whether the direct patronage of the State flows most in the channel where there is the greatest need for it, and whether the expenditure on the higher Government institutions might not gradually but largely be withdrawn, and the funds be utilised in the extension and improvement of the lower institutions.” He 35 then quotes a long passage from the Report of the inspector of the south-west division favourable to the encouragement of voluntary and mission schools, Again and again, in that important document laid before Parliament, with all the sanction and authority of the Council on Education in India, is attention called to the importance of carrying out the recommendation of the 62nd section of the despatch of 1854. In one passage he says: ‘The obvious infer- ence is that if Government wishes to restrict itself to its proper province, and to promote higher education by the’ grant-in-aid system, it must retire from direct competition wrth vt.” RELIGIOUS NEUTRALITY AN IMPORTANT FEATURE OF THE DESPATCH OF 1854. That the Home Government meant their education scheme to be thoroughly impartial in its treatment of all forms of religion is too obvious to need any demonstration. I am not aware of any one in this country having questioned this feature of the Government policy. It is too ostenta- tiously proclaimed to be questioned by any one who knows and trusts in the honesty of English statesmen; it is only doubted by suspicious Asiatics, who, the more it is asserted, only doubt it the more. | But wherein does neutrality consist? Does it mean that Neutrality by the Government will not in any way interfere with the ee ae religious beliefs of the natives of India, then I unhesitatingly sible. maintain that in the matter of direct teaching in the higher departments, the principle of neutrality is violated in the most practical and important manner. It is true the Government professors do not directly attack the heathen systems of religion in class hours, nor do they teach Christianity. But they do what is far worse, they under- 1, undermines mine the religion of the Hindus, and offer no substitute in nativereli- its place. I admit it is not intentional, but is not the less real and effectual. It is impossible to teach European science and literature without destroying belief in the gods and religions of India. I will not waste time in showing how it is that such is the effect. It is well known that their Uproots belief. T. B. Macaulay. Dr. M. Mitchell. Unsettles moral prin- ciples. Government appointment of professors. Rev. W. F. Stevenson. 36 false religions are so interwoven with the most erroneous systems of geography, history, astronomy, and science, that the mere teaching of the truth in these departments of a higher education necessarily destroys religious belief. No man who knows India can doubt this. To say that the effect is the same as the teaching of true science in Christian countries is gross misrepresentation. None but a man who is ignorant of India or a sceptic in religion could assert it. But let me call a few out of many witnesses to the fact. So long ago as 1833 Macaulay wrote as follows :—‘“ No Hindu, who has received an English education, ever remains sincerely attached to his religion. Some continue to profess it as a matter of policy; but many profess themselves pure Deists, and some embrace Christianity.” * Dr. Murray Mitchell, so long a distinguished missionary and educationist in India, said at a mission conference in Mildmay Hall last year: “In colleges the gulf between Hinduism and European thought yawns wide and fathom- less. Hinduism teaches a professedly inspired science which is outrageously absurd. The pupil soon rejects it with con- tempt, and at the same time necessarily rejects also the authority of the book which inculcates it. There is thus to him no divine revelation; no authoritative declaration of spiritual truth. For an individual or a community to be thus suddenly tossed from superstition into scepticism is surely a transition most perilous and painful. No wonder if the mental balance is destroyed and the moral nature often completely wrecked.” He then speaks of the effect of the character and profession of the teachers in the Government colleges. “ In appointing professors, Government seems to have a regard only to intel- lectual qualifications. In religion, a man may be a Christ- ian, Deist, Atheist, Comtist, or Agnostic; the Government serenely ignores the question both of his creed and character.” He admits that there are Christian men among them, but quotes authority for saying that there are also among them distinguished men who have “diffused the principles of Tom Paine over a whole generation of youth.” The Rey. W. Fleming Stevenson, lately returned from his * ¢ Life of Lord Macaulay.” 37 mission of inquiry in the East, told the last General Assembly in Ireland that a native who observed to him “those of us who learn English do not believe in idols,” expressed the general mind of his class. He adds: ‘The head of a native college said one day, ‘I believe that every one of our students who leaves. us, knowing English, has ceased to believe in popular Hinduism.’” How many educated young men be- lieve in the Shastras? was the question recently addressed to the students in a Calcutta college. Promptly there were two answers—‘‘ Not one in a hundred,” and ‘“ Not one in a thousand,” and the rest assented. And the Under-Secretary of Government in India, in a report to the Home Govern- ment, puts it in the mildest form when he says: ‘“ And what is the product which it costs the State so much to produce? The Bengali undergraduate has had a fair vernacular educa- tion, and has gained at least a superficial knowledge. of English, but he is possibly, I may say probably, if from a Government school, without any religious belief at all.” We might multiply such evidence, but it is unnecessary. It is in vain to call such a system neutral, it systematically This not undermines all religious belief, and leaves the youth of India "ty. at the most critical period of their lives in a condition most dangerous and disadvantageous to the formation of moral principles and habits. The Under-Secretary in a report to the Indian Government, Testimony of speaking of the effect of introducing European science, &c., Be eee says : “‘ Every day opened to the student a succession of new Government. and strange phenomena in the unsealed realm of history, science, and philosophy. They were suddenly thrown adrift Unsettles from the mooring and anchorages of old creeds, and tossed ae upon the wide sea of speculation and extravagance. “Tt was no wonder that moral and social obligations began and sense of to share the fate of religious beliefs, and that the whole com- Wor! obs munity was in alarm at the spread of the new views. This was precisely the state of things which Mr. Charles Marsh had so eloquently anticipated during the discussion of the charter in 1813. ‘It is one thing,’ he said, ‘to dispel the charm which binds mankind to established habits and ancient obligations, and another to turn them over to the discipline and the authority of new doctrines. In that dreadful His testimony to missionary influence. Moral and social prin- ciples sub- verted. Dr. C. Macnamara. 38 wnterval—that dreary void, when the mind is left to wander and grope its way without the props that have hitherto supported it, or the lights which have guided it-—what are the chances that they will discern the beauties or submit to the restraints of the religion you may propose to give them ?’ That ‘dreadful interval,” the Under-Secretary. goes on to say, “and ‘that dreary void’ had now arrived, and it is impossible to say how far native society might not have been disorganised, HAD NOT THE MISSIONARIES STEPPED IN AND SUPPLIED A NEW DIRECTION TO THE AWAKENING SCEPTICISM AND A FRESH SUBJECT TO ATTRACT THE NEW AROUSED SPIRIT OF SPECULATION.” A most important testimony from a high official of great knowledge and experience reporting to the Government. In regard to the moral influence of the teaching in the colleges where no religion is taught, it may be admitted that the educated natives, from contact with English pro- fessors of high character and position, are influenced by a feeling of honour to pay more regard to truth and honesty than the uneducated. But, on the other hand, it is indisputable that they have acquired not a few new vices or aggravated old ones. They have far less regard to the authority of parents or superiors, and they are more supercilious and contemptuous in the treatment of their more ignorant brethren. The marriage tie is less regarded, and they are more addicted to luxurious habits, and the new vice of drunkenness is making alarming inroads on the physical condition and social habits of the educated youth of India. The Report to Parliament of 1870 seems to us frequently to indicate what it would have been unwise in such a docu- ment to express, that the results in this respect are not satisfactory. It is a subject on which we cannot get docu- mentary or official evidence, but, from all we can learn, the following sad picture of society in Bengal could be substan- tiated by overwhelming moral evidence. It was spoken publicly at the opening of the session of the Medical School of Westminster Hospital last October by Dr. C. Macnamara, and, from his long and extensive practice, to a large extent amongst the bighest class of the native, few men have had such opportunities of knowing their habits and sentiments. 39 He said: “ Many natives admit the benefits conferred by our rule, but they deplore the disorganised state of society in Bengal. The old families have almost disappeared, and the sons and husbands of the educated and rising generation are largely addicted to drunkenness and vice of every kind, and the more thoughtful men and the vast majority of women contrast this state of things with times when there was less security to life and property, less law, taxation, and educa- tion, but when the greatest slur that could attach itself to a man’s name was that of being an undutiful son. Our system of education has broken down all faith in religion, and the outcome of a purely secular training has developed gross materialism and rank socialism, and so the necessity for suppressing the outspoken sentiments of the vernacular press, which, nevertheless, gave utterance to opinions he had heard over and over again for some years past among all classes of natives, and which he dreaded would one day break out into a revolt, in comparison with which the Mutiny was a mere brawl.”’ Where, then, I ask, is the neutrality of our present method ? But what was the design of the Home Government in the despatch of 1854? It aimed at neutrality, as we shall show, in a most enlightened and effective way. UNIVERSITIES, GRANTS-IN-AID, AND INSPECTION WERE THE MEANS BY WHICH A NEUTRAL SYSTEM IN THE HIGHER EDUCATION OF INDIA COULD ALONE BE CARRIED OUT. I have shown how decidedly the Home Government expressed its desire for the withdrawal of the direct teaching in the higher departments, and that the universities were meant to supersede the necessity for it. I do not assert that it was wholly, or chiefly,—it was, perhaps, not at all on the ground of their not being incon- _ sistent with neutrality that they were to be withdrawn. It _ would have been questionable policy to have declared that they were practically incompatible with neutrality. But it is a most significant fact, that all the references to neutrality that I can see in the despatch, are in connection with the three new features which it introduced into the education Neutrality of despatch, Refers to con- ferring univer- sity degrees on special subjects Not carried out. 40 of India—viz., The “ Universities,” “Grants-in-Aid,” and “ Inspection.” To secure impartiality in quotations, I shall give those collected by a strong advocate of the present system. Mr. Cust says in his pamphlet on this subject :— “Thave carefully gone over these famous one hundred paragraphs, though I have often read them before. If there is any one leading characteristic of that charter, it is the desire not to awaken a religious difficulty. Thus :— “Par, 28, ‘The examination at the University will not include any subject connected with religious belief, and the affiliated institutions will be under the management of persons of every variety of religious persuasion.’ “ Par. 32. ‘We shall refuse to sanction any teaching (connected with Hindu and Mohammedan tenets), as directly opposed to the principle of religious neutrality, to which we have always adhered.’ “Par. 34. ‘(The Senate) will include natives of India of all religious persuasions.’ | “ Par. 53, ‘The system of grants-in-aid will be based on an entire abstinence from interference with the religious instruction con- veyed in the school.’ “Par. 56. ‘No notice whatsoever to be taken by the Inspector of the religious doctrines, which may be taught in the school.’ “Par. 57. ‘It may be advisable distinctly to assert in them the principle of perfect religious neutrality, on which the grants will be awarded.’” If the system thus laid down had been faithfully and impartially carried out there would have been nothing to complain of. Mr. Robert N. Cust, and Mr. M. Kempson, who have lately written pamphlets in support of the higher education by Government, and in opposition to the recent circular of the Church Missionary Society, and the views I had advocated at the Conference on Missions in October last, both maintain, that the principles of the despatch have been carried out. The former quotes a number of passages from resolutions and declarations by the Government in India. But these gentlemen should distinguish between good resolutions and good deeds. I never questioned the designs and intentions of the Government, or its members. I have always made Al full allowance for the difficulties of their position. I do not even impute motives to the parties most interested in sup- porting the present system, I give them full credit for thinking the system of which they are the representatives or agents the best that could be carried out. But we cannot: blind our eyes to facts, and it is with facts that I deal, not words. It is very difficult for any class of men Systems dread to see their own faults, or the faults of their systems, and a, aaa it is for that reason I urge action from without. It is hardly to be expected that the system will perform the rite which Japanese officials ironically call the “happy despatch.” ‘‘ Kuthanasia,” a most sweet word, is not likely to become popular among systems any more than amongst individuals; nor is it desirable. A responsible Government must take the work in hand. Mr. Kempson tells us, with- Mr. Kempson’s out the slightest reference to any evidence, that in regard hte to my charges against the tendency of the present system, “They have no existence in fact, so far as my experience goes.” If Mr. Kempson’s experience was limited to the north-west provinces, in which he was “ Director of Public Instruction,” I can conceive it possible that he may not have seen, in an obvious form, the evils I speak of, for two reasons. First, because these provinces have been only a Pldest seats of : ; : earning the comparatively short time under the system, which takes worst results. time to produce its baneful fruit. Ina list of the pro- fessed religious beliefs of graduates over all India, I was struck with the fact, that of the number of those who pro- fessed themselves of no religious belief, the proportion was far greatest in Bengal, where the system had been longest in force, and it almost vanished as we came to these regions in which it was comparatively new. Second, the north-west provinces and the Punjab have Good rulers. been highly favoured with commissioners and lieutenant- governors of the very highest wisdom and character, who did much to put education on the best possible basis in their power. Disloyalty and open irreligion and immorality, under such men as Sir Henry Lawrence, Lord Lawrence, and Sir William Muir, would have been unnatural and improbable.* * There is a third reason, but as it assumes the form of personality I will not introduce it into my argument. Mr. Kempson seems to form very decided Grants-in-aid for all. Natives could support colleges. Testimony of witnesses. Evidence recent and remote. 42 Second misconception. Both Mr. Kempson and Mr. Cust assume, that in advocating the withdrawal of the Govern- ment colleges we expect that the grants-in-aid are to go exclusively, or almost exclusively, to mission colleges, and against this their arguments on the ground of neutrality are telling enough. But it is an easy feat to knock down a man of straw of our own setting up. I would at once say that such a procedure would be not only opposed to neutrality but to justice. The natives of India have a right to be fairly and even liberally dealt with in such a case; and I fully expect that they would set themselves to establish and maintain colleges and high schools, if they were left to stand alone, instead of being bolstered up by a pauperising system. They have done so before, and would do it again. When the desire for education had not a tithe of the strength it has now, the natives of India made noble contributions for education. Now it is a felt necessity, and there is no fear of the higher education going down. If the universities are kept up, they will maintain the standard in all the higher schools and colleges. That the natives of India are able, and would, if left to their own resources, maintain the colleges, is asserted in Government reports. Mr. Arthur Howell, than whom no man had better means of knowing, asserts 1t ; the conference of missionaries at Allahabad expressed the same opinion and in the last “statement exhibiting the moral and material progress of India,” attention is called to the circumstance that on the occasion of the visit of the Prince of Wales, the wealthy natives in several places commemorated the event by raising money for educational purposes. The native gentlemen of Behar alone subscribed the sum of £20,000. We have had noble examples of liberality among the natives of India in both building and endowing colleges and opinions on very slender data. He had only seen a brief and necessarily an imperfect account of my views in a pamphlet by Mr. Cust, who did not even quote my words; and yet, with no other means of knowing my character or opinions, he pens and prints the following words: ‘‘ It need hardly be said that want of sympathy leads to detraction and antagonism.” Then follow such expressions as ‘‘ unfair and mischievous,” “imperfect information,” ‘‘ a libel on the people of India,” &. On what ground does Mr. Kempson charge me with ‘‘want of sympathy’ with the Government, and guilty of ‘‘ detraction ’? and “libel” and ‘‘ mischievous respresentations ” of the people of India ? 43 schools before Government began to do it for them. We are apt-to forget that learning was honoured and maintained in India long before we had emerged from barbarism. We do not expect them to volunteer to do this ; like most Willnotvolun- subjects of an absolute government, they prefer to have every- eh et thing done for them. But if left alone in a firm, cautious, and friendly spirit, they could and would provide it for themselves. But would this be an advantage in a missionary point of Benefit to view? That is not with me the first question. Is it right Be ate in itself? That is what we have to see to; and if it is right, | I am sure it will be best for the righteous cause. Missions have nothing to fear in a fair competition with natives of any class. It is only the unfair competition with a Government, backed by the prestige and pay that makes voluntary efforts by either natives or missions so arduous or impossible. If that competition were withdrawn, we have Fair com- reason to believe that colleges would soon cease to be a ated burden on the funds of the Church. They would, with slightly higher fees and a larger attendance, pay their own expenses. The average attendance at aided colleges is only seventy-four; they could educate three or four times that number without any corresponding addition to their con- tributions from home. If any should still say that the natives of India could not or would not support colleges for themselves; I would only say, that in that improbable and sad case they would have themselves to blame, and could not charge on Government the fault of aiding either mis- sionary societies or European residents in providing the needed means of education. It is found in Calcutta, that the high schools are now paying concerns, to use a mercantile phrase, and they are being established as a profitable commercial speculation. We have another and painful reason for urging the eradual withdrawal of the direct teaching by Government in the higher departments. THE PRESENT SYSTEM IS RAISING UP A NUMBER OF DISCONTENTED AND DISLOYAL SUBJECTS. This is not so much felt in districts in which education is of recent origin and limited in extent to the wants of the Expectations raised, to be dis- appointed, 44, locality. But in the old educational seats, especially in Bengal, this result of the Government system of direct education is painfully and alarmingly felt. It fosters and gives facilities for getting an education in the language and culture of the ruling power, which is generally interpreted into an intention to employing in lucrative and honourable posts those who have entered, as they think, with their Asiatic notions, into relations with the Government, in which their only sense of gratitude for the benefits of a cheap and liberal education is a “ lively anticipation of future favours,’ and a sense of injustice and a feeling of resentment if they are not conferred. The in- terpretation put on the despatch of 1854 has added to that native tendency to anticipate Government patronage for the favour they think they confer by attending its colleges. The wording of sec. 72 seems to have been so understood. It runs thus: “ We have always been of opinion that the spread of education in India will produce a greater efficiency in all branches of administration, by enabling you to obtain the services of intelligent and trustworthy persons in every department of Government; and, on the other hand, we believe that the numerous vacancies of different kinds which have constantly to be filled up may afford a great stimulus to education.” They could then say, as they do in sec. 73: “We understand that it is often not so much the want of Government employment, as the want of properly quali- fied persons to be employed by Government, which is felt at the present time in many parts of India.” They express regret that “no more than forty-six persons had been gazetted in Bengal up to 1852, all of whom were students in the Government colleges.” Other passages might be quoted to the same effect. These are worthy objects in themselves, but they have engendered un- reasonable expectations in the minds of a people like the Hindus. But what is the state of matters now? A supply vastly in excess of the demand, not only from Government offices, but from all sources of employment. In the Report for 1870, the Under-Secretary makes frequent reference to this A5 fact. . The following may be taken as a sample of the views repeatedly expressed or implied in the “ Blue Book.” Re- ferring to the educated native, he says: “ He is precluded by his education from manual labour, and from recruiting that class on whose industry and intelligence the prosperity of the country depends. He finds himself in keenest com- petition for intellectual employment—for there are thousands like himself—as the market, though ample, has been over- | stocked, and all the while industrial education has been neglected altogether, and there are millions for whom no kind of instruction has been provided by the Government at all.” This will easily be understood by a reference to the Supply in numbers who are prepared for, or who actually pass pga: through the colleges now, as compared with what they were 21 years ago, when the three universities were set up. In 1857 when the universities were founded, the matriculation examination only is given. In Calcutta, there were 244 candidates, of whom 162 passed. In 1877, there were 2425 candidates, of whom 1355 passed. In Madras, the number for 1857 was 41 candidates, of whom 36 passed; in 1877 there were 2517 candidates, of whom 1250 passed. It will give an idea of the increase of educa- tion, when we quote from the “ Abstract,” laid before Parlia- ment last year, the following figures. In ten years, from 1868 to 1877, the three universities conferred the following degrees :— 286 received the degree of M.A. 1,652 mt se B.A. 209 received diplomas in civil engineering.. 809 + , in medicine. 910 fy ® inlaws 4,091 passed the first arts examination. 17,802 i entrance examination. Add 5,948 who passed the entrance examination from 1857-1867, and we have 23,740 matriculated within these 21 years. The rapid rate of progress may be judged of by taking AG the numbers who passed each fifth year during this period. In 1857, 198 passed the entrance examination in Calcutta and Madras universities; that for Bom- bay was not then formed. eT TS ee nee ore ~ ns 4: 9 CGT SEye tas *y the three universities. » 1872, 1486 i “ 3 ~ » 1877, 2808 ai Ms . _ ds Well may we ask with the Under-Secretary in the “ Return’ from which these figures are taken: ‘ Does the system tend to confer those vast moral and material blessings which flow from the general diffusion of useful knowledge?” described in the despatch of 1854. What becomes ‘“ What becomes of all these highly-educated young men, Seep aia whom the university turns out every year? Are they, as in England, absorbed into the channels of every-day life, with a satisfactory or even perceptible result? Are they to be traced, as in England, in a liberal and enlightened native press? Do native gentlemen, like English gentle- men, return to their zemindaries from a university career to spread around them the reflex of the enlightenment they have received themselves? Does the process of highly educating a few and leaving the masses, tend to increase or diminish the gulf between class and class? Are there any | indications of a decrease in crime, or of a dawn of intel- ligence in the agricultural classes? Such* questions will occur to any one who sees how the public expenditure on education is annually distributed, and how comparatively few are the recipients of the larger share of the State’s bounty.” Native press He professes his inability to answer these questions. It controlled. NLA ‘ is time they were answered. Recent events have given an unsatisfactory reply; our attempt to control the native press is the most significant answer that Government has yet given. Will that satisfy the nation and the Church ? The above figures give no idea of the number of educated natives qualified for, as they think, and fully expecting employment in Government or mercantile offices, and in a 47 large proportion of cases finding none of the kind they expected ; while, by their training, they are, as Mr. Howell says, “unfitted for manual and productive industry.” In the official Report on the “Moral and Material Pro- gress of India,” laid before Parliament Jast year, the expres- sion occurs regarding the educated class—‘ The complaint is reiterated by the local Government, that the youth of Bengal resort almost exclusively to two professions, which are over-stocked—the law and the public service... . Dislike of manual work creates a prejudice against (even) the practical study of mechanics.” If we look beyond those who have succeeded in passing Indian not , ; ; 4 i. like English the entrance examination, or in obtaining degrees, to the graduates, much larger number who have come up as candidates from the higher schools, with a good education in their own languages, and a fair knowledge of English, acquired not for its own sake, or for the sake of the literary treasures it contains, but solely with a view to sordid gain or worldly promotion, we shall have a better idea of the source whence so much discontent and disloyalty emanate. The number of candidates who have presented themselves for examination by the universities, during these twenty-one years, amounts in the aggregate to not less than 61,650. To show the rate of increase, we find, that for the first eleven years the number of applicants was 15,673. In the last ten years it was 45,977. The “General Report on Public Instruction in Bengal,” just come to hand, states, that “the number has doubled since 1874.” These numbers, though Only too large, are not, it may be said, great, when compared with yelatively. the population of India. But they are out of all proportion to the numbers educated in the lower departments, and what is of far more consequence, far above the natural law of demand and supply. No comparison can be drawn from European habits, where the higher education is part of the equipment for the life of a gentleman, as well as a qualifi- cation for professional employment. To the Indian this European culture is almost exclusively a preparation for professional, and still more for official, life, and disappointed of these, the education has only excited wants and raised expectations which leave the unsuccessful aspirant a discon- E3 A solemn offi- eial warning. Government is responsible, 48 tented and dangerous man, ‘These figures speak for them- selves, The Under-Secretary of the Home Department in India, was painfully impressed with the state of matters of which he knew so much, and in 1869 wrote these eloquent and solemn words in his “ Report”—-words which may well go home to-every patriotic heart. The danger is far greater now than it was ten years ago, It grows with the growth of the system: ‘‘ Looking to the rapid growth of our educational system, and to the enormous influence for good or evil that a single able and well-educated man may exercise in this country; and looking at the dense but inflammable ignorance of the millions around us, it seems a tremendous experiment for the State to under- take, and in some provinces almost monopolise, the direct training of whole generations, above their own creed, and above the sense of relation to another world upon which they base all their moral obligations ; and the possible evil is obviously growing with this system;” and he concludes with the solemn warning : “ It is true that things go smoothly and quietly, but this is attained by ignoring, not only the inevitable results of early training on the character, and the great needs of human nature, especially in the East, but by also ignoring the responsibility which devolves on the Government that assumes the entire control of direct educa- tion at all. If, therefore, while fanaticism is raging around, there is a calm in our schools and colleges, it is an ominous and unnatural calm of impossible continuance, the calm of the centre of the cyclone.” ABout REMEDIES AND OBJECTIONS.—FiIrRstT, GOVERNMENT INSTITUTIONS. I do not feel called on to lay down the programme of a future policy; that I leave for more experienced and compe- tent hands. I have proved the existence of an evil of a most pernicious and perilous kind, which demands a remedy on the score of religion, morality, and good government. I _ have shown the presence of institutions supported by natives _ and Kuropean residents, as well as those by missionary 49 societies, capable of indefinite expansion, with a continuance of the grants-in-aid now given. I have called attention to the principle underlying the whole of the despatch of 1854, which anticipated and required a change from the existing method of dvrect instruction by the Government. The uni- versities, the grants-in-aid, and inspection being all based on that principle. In these circumstances, I am under no Firm, cautious, necessity of proposing any new method, I simply icles fois thie One ney es honest and earnest carrying out of the provision of the de- Chea spatch.* It will be a difficult, but not an impossible task. It must be done firmly and persistently, but slowly and cautiously, under imperial authority: not in a spirit of antagonism to the natives, but by appealing to their better feelings, and calling on them to make a sacrifice for the benefit of their poorer and less-favoured brethren. I have too much respect for the higher classes in India, to suspect them of the selfish desire to continue a monopoly of State education at the expense of the poor. With special colleges, and the technical schools, and normal schools and colleges, we would not interfere. The education in the higher class of schools should also and higher- be given up by the GC eeient In them the branches “** schools taught necessarily tend to undermine belief, as well as, though not to the same extent as in the colleges, and it would be easy for the natives and societies to keep them up. They can be made even now to pay their own expenses under native teachers, with a good European master. The universities would of course remain, and would be a guarantee, and the means of keeping up the standard, and stimulat- ing to the highest effort by their examinations, degrees, scholarships, and rewards. They might be improved by broadening the basis of representation at their boards. These are what we ask, and they are only what the Home What Home Government have urged for the last quarter of a century. pavers But if “it’s a far cry to Loch Awe,” it’s a farther cry to the Hooghly, and it will require the loudest and most stern call of the British Parliament, to secure a consistent carrying out of its determinations. * See the first sentence in the analysis of the despatch by the Under-Secre- tary, Appendix D. Why in vain. Government preoccupied. External influence, of a profes- sional class. Mission col- leges disliked. 50 But it may be asked, since the terms of the despatch are so explicit, and the wishes of Government have been so clearly and frequently expressed during these twenty-fiveyears, why have not Government colleges been reduced in number, and the funds employed on lower education, or the cheap sub- stitution for grants-in-aid in native and mission colleges ? The answer is not far to seek. The Indian Government cannot give, or does not give, that amount of time and attention to education which the subject demands. They are so much taken up with weighty and multifarious affairs of a more urgent, though not more important nature, that they have left the power, not formally, but practically, in the hands of secular educationists. They have thrown open the highest appointments, even those of ‘“ Directors of Public Instruction,’ which at first were given to experienced civilians, to professors and principals of colleges and schools, as the rewards of lengthened service, or of ability in teaching. The consequences are what might have been expected. With the best intention, it may be, these men inevitably identify themselves with their system, which had been all along the higher education. They think, and in fact tell us, that we must educate the higher classes to the highest pitch, and by-and-by education will ‘ percolate downward to the lower strata.’ We all know the tendency of professional and class legislation. To set a body of ecclesiastics or schoolmasters, of doctors or lawyers, of officers of the army or navy, to take steps for gradually reducing their numbers, until they become extinct, and to foster and strengthen another body of men for whom they had no affection, and in whom, from professional pride, they had probably no confidence, to take their place, would not be a likely way to gain the end desired. They would find a thousand good reasons for avoiding the task, or delaying its execution. In fact, to ask men to extinguish themselves or their system is wrong, to expect them to do it is folly. But I must call attention to what is worse than evasion and delay in carrying out the provisions of the despatch and. the wishes of the Government. There seems of late, a growing tendency to discourage, if not to destroy, the aided colleges, as rivals to those of Government. 51 It is with pain that I have lately received stronger con- firmation of what has long been feared, that there is a great desire to get rid of all our missionary colleges, which have done so much for the education of the people, and, as the highest officers of the Government have allowed, done much to save society from the baneful effects of mere secular teaching. Some of these colleges have of late years greatly improved in their management and efficiency, and now number a larger roll of graduates than those of Government. This is what the despatch aimed at, and what ought to have been hailed with gratitude. Instead of that, what do we find? The most efficient of them are being treated with the greatest severity, and the grants-in-aid are reduced, and reduced in the most arbitrary way, and on such short notice as to be embarrassing and discouraging to the managers. I cannot now give details, but record the fact, and am _ pre- pared with details which will appear ere long. It has long been known that some in high employment in the Educational Department are opposed to mission colleges, on the ground of religious feeling. They openly advocate views directly adverse to Christianity; and this feeling, which formerly found vent in contempt for a weak opponent, now finds vent in acts of bitter hostility towards a powerful rival. I am far from charging professors and directors as a body with hostility to religion, but it can- not be denied that there are some of the most active and pushing of their number who are opposed to anything in the form of living Christianity, and in a system which ws based on the exclusion of religion those who are hostile to it have a vantage ground, in opposing institutions which condemn their own by teaching the truths which they ignore, and yet gain the confidence of the natives, and do their work at so much less cost to the Government.* I need not reply to the objections which may be made to these simple proposals. I would refer to the able men who drew up the despatch, as a guarantee that its provisions are wise and practicable. It is well known that Sir Charles Wood took counsel with the wisest and most experienced men of all parties, in preparing that important document-— * They plead economy, but are increasing the cost of Government colleges. Discouraged. Hostility of Secularists. Do not reply to objections, Experienced men drew up despatch, Call for co- operation. In place division of labour. Waste in men and money, 52 the Magna Charta of education in India. The most ex- perienced governors, civilians, professors, and missionaries were engaged in its composition, and it bears the mark of the greatest wisdom and minutest forethought, “aided,” as they say they were in paragraph six, “‘ by ample experience of the past and the most competent advice for the future.” It is not disrespectful to say of those who have carped at, and opposed the carrying out of its provisions, that they cannot boast of greater wisdom and experience than those who gave such mature and disinterested attention to the drawing up of a code worthy of the new era, when, as they say, in the opening paragraph, “ By an Act of the Imperial Legislature, the responsible trust of the Government of India has again been placed in our hands.” If the despatch is impracticable, let them ask for its repeal. SECOND, About MISSION COLLEGES. It is most desirable that, in order to the efficient and economical management of mission colleges, the different Evangelical Churches co-operate in supporting and managing them. At first these educational missions were entirely conducted by the Church of Scotland, and only one was set up in each Presidential city. But ere long, one after another of the leading missionary societies started on the same line—a most gratifying - evidence of the proved efficiency of the system which Dr. Duff may be said to have originated, but leading to what cannot but be deplored as a needless waste in men and money. So long as the Presbyterian Church of Scotland made this line of action a speciality in mission work, for which, as the Church of John Knox, she was peculiarly fitted, it made a good division of labour, taking the missions in India as one body working for one great end; but when each began to add- this feature to their other work, or to give up other forms of work for this, it had the necessary effect of multiplying small educational institutions, with a small number of pupils, either with a small staff of teachers, in which case they were inefficient, or with a large staff, and then the average cost of each pupil was very high. 53 It is found, then, that four or five European professors, with Economy. native assistants, can teach 300 or 400 pupils as well as they could teach a fourth part of the number, which reduces the cost of each pupil in proportion. At present the number of pupils, in aided colleges, is on an average only seventy-four to each. Far too small a number to pay, as they might be made to do, the great part, if not eventually nearly the whole, of their own expenses, but for the wasteful competition amongst themselves, and still more the unequal competition with Government institutions. A slight rise in the fee with increased attendance would make colleges self-supporting. An example of this kind of co-operation has been exhi- A partial bited in Madras under the able presidency and through the aut exertions of Mr. Miller, with the most satisfactory results— the Church of England, the Established Church of Scotland, and the Methodist Missionary Societies, all contributing to the Free Church College, under a board of management on the spot. It is hoped that these societies and others will combine at home for a general movement, which may establish mission colleges of a high class, in greater force, at more stations, and at less expense to each society than at present. Another point of great importance is to see that such a A full staff staff of professors and teachers is kept up, as shall admit totes 18 of greater attention being paid to evangelistic work in the colleges and amongst those who have passed through our educational institutions. This work must, as a rule, be done by the professors, not by a separate class set apart as evangelists. They would be looked on with distrust, and would not get the hold on old scholars which a former teacher would. Every professor and Must be evan- teacher must be an evangelist, who carries his evangelistic rer spirit into the school and college, every day, and at all times. By having a larger staff, there could always be one in turn engaged in looking after, and addressing as occasion offered, old graduates of their own or Government. colleges, in the towns, and by occasional itinerancy in the surrounding Sporadic and country for scattering the seed of the Word where it may consen™e fall into the hearts of old pupils, and recall old lessons. This kind of sporadic work, conducted on a concentric prin- Normal schools and colleges. The Church’s duty, over- sight and prayer. Hinduism to fall not by dis- integration ; but in mass, like old tower, BA e ciple, would be of great use. Each college should be a centre, and the circle would correspond with the radius from which its graduates were drawn. It is a shame to the Church that by having almost all our colleges undermanned it was impossible to carry on such work in a methodical and efficient way. Another branch of work which ought to be greatly extended, is the training of teachers for the elementary schools. Jf a large number of well-qualified teachers were trained, they would soon get employment throughout the country, if the stimulus were given to the elementary educa- tion which was originally intended by the despatch of 1854. In the last place, let there be more intelligent oversight, and earnest prayer by the Church at home; and we hope, that, ere long, we may see glorious results. There is a great leavening process going on in Hindu thought and feeling. There is a conviction diffused that the Christian system is the true, and will be the triumphant religion in India. There will be opposition, there may be a conflict, imperiling our rule, if not our existence, in the country, ere that triumph is attained, but it will come, and it will, we believe, come with a sudden and mighty rush which will startle and amaze an incredulous age. Hinduism is like no other system that now exists, or has ever existed in the world. It seems as if it would defy those processes of disintegration, by which believers may be gathered by units or tens or hundreds from other sects and races, in other systems, in other lands, or even in India, as among the aboriginal tribes, or those simpler races in Tinevelley and Travancore, which never fully partook of the fatal privileges of Brahminical religion, and were never brought within the iron bondage of caste, where missions have been so largely successful. Hinduism defies the tooth of time and the tool of the engineer to disintegrate it, or to pick out a stone from the hard and compact structure, except in a few rare and exceptional cases, and the intensity of passion with which these few conversions are felt and resented shows how perfect is the unity of the body—“ If one member suffers all the members suffer with it.” When Hinduism falls, it will fall as those grand old towers fall which have outlived the age and state of society for which dd they were constructed ; so strongly cemented that they will stand or fall entire—they cannot be taken down like our frail modern structures, stone by stone. It is only by the By under- E : ae mining foun- slow and persevering process of sapping and mining that they dations. can be brought to the ground, and they fall in one solid mass, It is thus that this great donjon, in which super- stition and caste have kept the millions of India as in a castle of despair, will one day fall, ‘to rise no more at all.” A thousand agencies are at work to undermine it, secular and religious, and we wish them all God-speed ; but none can compare with the full and clear proclamation of the glorious Gospel, in thoroughly equipped and efficiently conducted educational institutions, in which Divine light is thrown on every subject of human study, by generous and disinterested men of the highest culture and Christian character. ‘oe “Ww teh atl h nian Bais. 8 f aif A “OHIE yo io re 4, Ti ; aaa sd ite 730! halk eet ae CUO. ie _ Dans ray F oui: he, 1) ner nt. fiat Tr) OWL NA parry OOS Be an ol ieee op dt (jcc gh Tf Lit)4) at iy Bich if aul t ayidt ® esas wail To ae gory wit! aN if 67. suk stheny Sure sh ey pA " Mat wi acy (live cfhaguau ty olfan ‘ os 240 vay up RF1Oth Oi Lrensssciebt KG a ae iy i | ‘ov 1 bests or sifs 4 boa eis bi. {Ti Dae ye SHO See : Fa 8 He Be { (eroweuhy ui \fosgipkd pis: det abe Acts lag Gi tantihate nik Ta bai i ores DA’ of ih 3 * hee | 4 mye cua h Pow ake er waa ri a * APPENDICES. APPENDIX A. Ir is not necessary that I go back to the earlier periods of our intercourse with that country. Without reckoning the embassy which King Arthur is said to have sent out in 883, our direct connection with India may be said to date from the year 1601, when a “company of merchants trading to the East Indies,” with a capital of £75,000, sent out five vessels, varying from 600 to 130 tons, carrying £6860 in goods and £28,742 in bullion. Our attempts to impart the higher blessings of education and religion date from a much more recent period. To our disgrace, two cen- turies passed without any attempt by the nation or the Church to confer any benefit, material or spiritual, on the natives of India. Individual efforts for the amelioration and enlightenment of the population were made. Noble philanthropists and earnest Christ- ians made the pages of our history bright with their deeds, all the more bright and worthy of admiration from the general darkness and the opposition they met with from those in power. APPENDIX B. It is, I believe, a great mistake to suppose that by our professing that we would rule the country in the fear and according to the revealed will of our God, we would have endangered our position in India. On the contrary, it would have strengthened our posi- tion, and have tended to secure the confidence of the natives. Keeping our religion in the back-ground is the way to excite their suspicions. They, like all weak races, are accustomed to gain their ends by concealment and duplicity, and they never doubt but that we have some deep and dangerous policy concealed under our ostentatious form of ignoring religion. They naturally think that it is our interest to make them adopt our religion. They 58 cannot conceive of a religion that does not pervade every depart- ment of human life,—personal, social, and political. Their own religion covers the whole of life, and they cannot be convinced that ours does not. They necessarily and rightly conclude that it ought to do so. The practical effect of our neutral policy is to excite distrust and fear, and lays us open to the constant suspicion of a deep-laid scheme to undermine their religion or to convert them by strata- gem. The nature of religion, as they understand it, makes this not only possible, but easy, if not inevitable. By the essential out- wardness and minute observances of their system they know that they may be made outcasts from society, and put beyond the pale of their religion by a most trifling outward act or circumstance entirely independent of their own intention or will,—a mere accident or oversight of their own, or a malicious act of another may be the cause of ruin to multitudes both for this world and the next. It is this feature of the religion of the Hindus, coupled with their suspicion of our designs, that makes those rumours of our intention to convert them by means of force or fraud possible of belief and so dangerous to the Government, Had we at the beginning of our rule, or when proclaiming the empire in 1858 done two things—First, had we frankly and publicly declared that we were ourselves Christians, and tliat we believed it was the only true religion, and the best for all men, but that we had no intention of interfering with any man in his religious beliefs.* That we held the domain of conscience to be beyond and above the province of civil government, and appealed to the facts of our historic neutrality in this sense for these hundred years. Second, that the essential nature of our holy religion was such, that no power on earth could make a man a Christian against his will, That a mere outward profession of Christianity was an insult to our God, and would be of no use to its professor in this or in another world. That Christianity was a religion of faith and love and holy living, and that any service which was not rendered with the heart and of free will, was a mockery, and that the Government would prefer an honest and upright heathen to a hypocritical and false professor of Christianity. Had such a course been pursued from the first, a widespread rebellion like that of 1857, excited by the rumour of our convert- * We gratefully admit the frank avowal of personal belief in Christianity by our noble Queen. But the proclamation failed in not avowing that our Govern- ment would be regulated by the principles of the Word of God. 59 ing the soldiers by making them bite off the ends of cartridges greased with cow’s fat, would have been impossible, even in credulous and suspicious India. Had our country pursued such a course, it might, with the blessing of God, have stayed the horrors of that war, and it might have hastened the establishment of the kingdom of peace. If from books we turn to the men who have had the destiny of millions put into their hands, we are struck with warm admiration of the many noble lives which have been devoted to the welfare of our Eastern Empire. The profound wisdom displayed in the most trying circumstances, the calm courage in presence of appalling danger, the indomitable perseverance in overcoming Herculean difficulties, and above all the noble self-consecration and often self-sacrifice In serving a people who could not appreciate their aims or their motives, and often returned ingratitude for kindness and hatred for love, are an honour to our country and a blessing to the race. APPENDIX C. I cannot resist the temptation to quote the following testimony to the character of Zachary Macaulay from the lips of Mr. Gladstone, when speaking in opposition to the son of that noble old man :— “‘T can only speak from tradition of the struggle for the aboli- tion of slavery ; but if I have not been misinformed, there was engaged in it a man who was the unseen ally of Mr. Wilberforce and the pillar of his strength ; a man of profound benevolence, of acute understanding, of indefatigable industry, and of that self- denying temper which is content to work in secret, to forego the recompense of present fame, and to seek for its reward beyond the grave. The name of that man was Zachary Macaulay, and his son is a member in the existing Cabinet.” APPENDIX D. Despatcu oF 1854. The following brief summary of this important despatch is by the pen of the Secretary for the Home Department in India, prepared by authority for the Houses of Parliament :— “The Indian educational code is contained in the déspatches of the Home Government of 1854 and 1859, The main object of the former despatch is to divert the efforts of the Government 60 from the education of the higher classes upon whom they had up to that date been too exclusively directed, and to turn them to the wider diffusion of education among all classes of the people, and especially to the provision of primary instruction for the masses. Such instruction is to be provided by the direct instru- mentality of Government, and a compulsory rate, levied under the direct authority of Goverment, is pointed out as the best means of obtaining funds for the purpose. The system must be extended upwards by the establishment of Government schools as models, to be superseded gradually by schools supported on the grant-in-aid principle. This principle is to be of perfect religious neutrality, defined in regular rules adapted to the circumstances of each province, and clearly and publicly placed before the natives of India. Schools, whether purely Government institutions or aided, in all of which (excepting Normal schools) the payment of some fee, however small, is to be the rule, are to be in regular gradation from those which give the humblest elementary instruction to the highest colleges, and the best pupils of one grade are to climb through the other grades by means of scholarships obtained in the lower school and tenable in the higher. To provide masters, Normal schools are to be established in each province, and moderate allowances given for the support of those who possess an aptness for teaching and are willing to devote themselves to the profession of schoolmasters.* By this means it is hoped that, at no distant period, institutions may be in operation in all the presidencies calculated to supply masters for all classes of schools, and thus in time greatly to limit, if not altogether to obviate, the necessity of recruiting the educational service by means of engagements made .in England. The medium of education is to be the vernacular _ languages of India, into which the best elementary treatises in _ English should be translated. Such translations are to be | advertised for, and liberally rewarded by Government as the means of enriching vernacular literature. While, therefore, the _ vernacular languages are on no account to be neglected, the a Re ae English language may be taught where there is a demand for it, but the English language is not to be substituted for the vernacular dialects of the country. The existing institutions for the study of the classical languages of India are to be maintained, and respect is to be paid to the hereditary veneration which they command, Female education is to receive the frank and cordial support of Government, as by it a far greater proportional impulse is imparted to the educational and moral tone of the people, than by the education of men. In addition to the Government and aided 61 colleges and schools for general education, special institutions for imparting special education in law, medicine, engineering, art, and # agriculture are to recelve in every province the direct aid and encouragement of Government. The agency by which this system of education is to be carried out is a director in each province, assisted by a competent staff of inspectors, care being taken that the cost of control shall be kept in fair proportion to the cost of direct measures of instruction. To complete the system in each presidency, a university is to be established, on the model of the London University, at each of the three presidency towns. These universities not to be themselves places of education, but they are to test the value of the education given elsewhere; they are to pass every student of ordinary ability who has fairly profited by the curriculum of school and college study which he has passed through, the standard required being such as to command respect without discouraging the efforts of deserving students. Education is to be aided and supported by the principal officials in every district, and is to receive, besides, the direct encouragement of the State by the opening of Government appointments to those who have received a good education, irrespective of the place or manner in which it may have been acquired; and in the lower situations, by preferring a man who can read and write, and is equally eligible in other respects, to one who cannot.” * * Parliamentary Blue Book, 1870, p. 7. LORIMER AND GILLIES, PRINTERS, 31 ST. ANDREW SQUARE, EDINBURGH. res ol “oor SOL TVA gS ei ae jis rit | thy a8 Who otras o = z ie DAY. “4 D its + Hot sto re fs fi tt) s: ato rt a 3 ah ‘ _* w i 7G ft 4 a ’ awa é a G92 inofe tov’ ¥ i oe otk oF IOR Rees orien: lo oblae Ohh deer OF. Wie birta TTS sail » 2 saterlsh Settt ihe) Dae fy ctfguortity * ; | gat 708 :b uous 16 b Sabie ad, ¢ a yt Fy th ii ott aif i, | a aif} cus Posatee : » hoog a Davies sie ovhib | 7 Bitty) yi rout rsh wae Jt foider ai 7 OW MAE H % ah 5 fw OO oF OO Side parks Lor “ABOLITION” OR “TRANSFERENCE” : /\> »). GOVERNMENT COLLEGES AND HIGH SCHOOLS IN INDIA, ON THE AS REQUIRED BY THE DESPATCH OF 1854. ILLUSTRATED BY THE STATE OF EDUCATION IN MADRAS. BY THE REV. JAMES JOHNSTON, AUTHOR OF “OUR EDUCATIONAL POLICY IN INDIA,” ETC., ETC. Lonvon : PRINTED BY GILBERT AND RIVINGTON, 52, ST. JOHN’S SQUARE. 1880. PREFACE. | WE do not now need to show that the! object of the Despatch of 1854 was, amongst other things, to en- courage the spirit of independence, and to foster aided institutions, supported by native and Missionary as- sociations, and that it was therein expressly declared that Government colleges and the higher schools were to be gradually abolished, or transferred, as soon as education was so far advanced as to render such changes practicable. This must now be admitted by all who stand by the Education Despatch—the sole legislative measure on which education in India is based. The only question which we require to consider is: Has the time arrived when it will be practicable and safe to apply that important rule? I propose to answer that question in the affirmative, not by arguments or asser- tions as to the state of the country generally; but,—as I have always maintained that the principle must be applied cautiously, and that each case must be judged on its own merits,—by fixing on one town as an example, and the town chosen is Madras. REASONS FOR CHOOSING MADRAS. There are three reasons for choosing Madras as an illustration of the practicability of carrying out the principle of the Despatch of 1854. A 2 1V 1st. Because we consider it a fair example. It is neither the oldest nor the newest of the great seats of education. It is neither the richest nor the poorest, and it has no special advantages which would make it exceptional. There are many parts of India not yet ripe for the application of the rule. There are some as ready as Madras. 2nd. It is there that of late a special desire has been shown to foster and extend Government institutions, and to discredit and discourage aided ones. 8rd. It is in Madras that the demand is boldly made for a new interpretation of the Despatch of 1854. In a recent official document the Director of Public Instruction says :— «This controversy about the construction of the Despatch of 1854 has been going on for a quarter of a century, and it seems very desirable that it should be closed by some authoritative decision which will leave no further room for doubt in the minds, on the one hand of Christian Mission- aries, and on the other of the Hindu and Muhammedan sub- jects of her Majesty.” This controversy we regard as now settled by the authoritative interpretation of the Despatch by its author, Lord Halifax, and collateral evidence brought out in our former pamphlet, in which his Lordship’s testimony is given. In a more recent document which the Madras Government have just transmitted to the Secretary of State for India, he makes the assertion, as unqualified as it is groundless, that “if the Govern- ment colleges and schools which exist in this Presidency were made over to the management of local Committees of native gentlemen, the inevitable effect would be a general lowering of the standard of education.” ‘Such a measure,’ he adds, ‘‘ would be disastrous to Vv the cause of sound learning.” In accordance with these views, which are in direct contradiction of the fundamental principle of the Despatch, he is now setting himself to extend Government colleges and high schools, and is apparently doing what he can to discourage, if not to destroy, independent effort by either natives or Missionaries. ; We shall show in the following pages that there would be no difficulty in carrying on education in its highest form, if Government institutions did not stand in the way, and private enterprise were aided and encouraged. The question having been thus raised in Madras, we are willing to have it settled there. | REASONS FOR WITHDRAWING GOVERNMENT COLLEGES AND HIGH SCHOOLS. But why so urgent to get Government colleges and high schools abolished or transferred ? Ist. Because it is the only honest course in the light of the authority by which education was set up, and is now carried on in India—the Despatch of 1854, ratified as it was after the Mutiny by that of 1859, and invariably declared to be the policy of every Government up to this time. 9nd. Because Government direct teaching was never designed for, nor is it fitted to be a permanent and complete system of education. The leaving out of religious teaching was only excusable as a temporary expedient in a transitory system. drd. This Government system discourages the spirit of self-reliance and independent effort among the richer classes. The natives of India cannot be expected to vi burden themselves with the labour and expense of raising and supporting colleges and schools, so long as Government provides education for them, especially when the impression is left on their minds that to set up institutions of their own would be offensive to officials, if not disloyalty to State institutions. Ath. The prestige and influence of a school or col- lege, under the direct management of the Government, makes competition by private enterprise almost im- possible on the part of natives, and extremely difficult for’: any Society, especially in a country like India, under a system of paternal despotism. 5th. The high pay of Professors and_ teachers in Government colleges and schools intensifies the difficulty of maintaining private institutions. 6th. So long as Government maintains its own colleges in competition with private ones, it is next to an impossibility for Directors of Public Instruction, as Government servants, to overcome a feeling of par- tiality for institutions with which they naturally feel themselves identified, more especially when, as is now the growing custom, Government Professors are ele- vated to this responsible position. They would be more than human if they did not favour institutions from which they had risen, and old associates with whom they had wrought, rather than institutions and men whom they had formerly regarded as rivals, if not as antagonists. We charge none with conscious partiality ; but facts prove that, in such a case, im- partiality is in most cases impracticable. 7th. We advocate the withdrawal of Government colleges, because, by example and influence, they are leading the natives of India to imitate them in the systematic exclusion of religion from their colleges and Vil schools. This was neither expected nor desired by those who framed the Despatch of 1854. While they saw reasons for that course, in setting up a system which was professedly incomplete and temporary, they would have deplored its propagation and permanence. The effect of this system is becoming every year more manifest and disastrous. Whatever view we may take of mere secular teaching in this country, where secular teaching is merely negative in its form, and may prove negative in its results, in India it is altogether different ; there secular teaching is not the mere negation of religion, bad as that would be, with a people like the Hindus: it is not negative, but positive, and destructive of all the old religions, which they have been brought up to believe in and reve- rence. To unhinge these old beliefs, and offer no substitute, is enough to unsettle the mind of youth at the most critical period of life, to introduce a moral chaos, and set up by Government authority and in- finence a reign of scepticism in India, which can end in nothing short of anarchy and confusion. To edu- cate a nation on such a system, and that nation naturally ardent, imaginative, religious, tropical, is the sure way to ‘‘sow the wind and reap the whirl- wind.”’ It may, at first sight, seem hard and unreasonable to ask Government to give up the institutions it has founded and nourished at such a cost, and for such a length of time. If they were private establishments, and set up for private ends or personal profit, it would be both hard and unreasonable. But since they were established for the education of an Empire, and one of the grand lessons was, to teach the people how to educate themselves, it is no hardship. It is the glory Vill and triumph of the system to have reached such a happy consummation. It was never the design of Government that they should become permanent insti- tutions with vested interests, as seems to be the idea of Professors and Directors of Public Instruction of the present day. The vested interests of individuals we can understand and respect; but to turn our educa- tional system in India into a bureaucracy would be to defeat the great end of its institution. ABOUT THE DANGER OF A RELIGIOUS PROPAGANDISM. There is one reason for maintaining our Government colleges which calls for consideration, or we should rather say, an unreasoning dread of withdrawing them, viz., lest it might lead to the cry of propagandism, and stir up the fears and fanaticism of the natives. This old ghost still stalks the earth, and haunts high places. It is full time it were laid. Many true friends of India have an honest dread of taking any step which might by any possibility be interpreted as an act of proselytizing on the part of the Government ; and in the document presented by the Director of Public Instruction to the Madras Council, the grand plea urged is, that if the Govern- ment colleges were given up, it would be ‘“ playing into the hands of the Missionaries ;’’ and he warns us of the danger of riots and rebellions, and all kinds of horrors. We sympathize with this feeling in men who left India twenty or thirty years ago, and those who judge from old reports of the state of feeling in that country. But in any man living there it is utterly inexcusable, 1x and is only another proof that our high officials, now- a-days, know very little of the real feelings of the natives, and that they live in a state of isolation much to be deplored. In that document, consisting of 40 pages of special pleading, there is not one modern example given of fanaticism on the part of the natives of India, nor one . mstance of their antipathy to Missionaries or Missionary institutions within the last twenty years. I do not say that some trifling outburst of momentary ill-feeling may not have occurred in some isolated cases, but the Director does not find one to his purpose, and only raises a small ghost supposed to have been seen in 1859. We do find in his lengthy declamation a vacue rumour that Government encouragement of Missionaries had been one cause of the Mutiny of 1857—a baseless fabrication of that excited time which it is most unfair even to allude to now; and what he calls ‘“‘ a monster meeting’ at Madras, in 1859, when resolutions were - passed in favour of withdrawing grants from the Mis- sionary institutions. There is no evidence given that this meeting had any significance at the time, and to refer to it now is a glaring anachronism, and shows a strange disregard of the great change that has come over public feeling during the last quarter of a century. To charge the inhabitants of Madras, or those of any seat of modern culture in India, with the fanaticism and intolerance of even the preceding generation, is almost as bad as to attribute to this tolerant age the witch and heretic-burning spirit of our ancestors. Natives and Missionaries who spend their lives in the country know and mark the rapid change. Govern- ment officials of the present day, whose term of service 2 x is comparatively short, and who have none of the family traditions of the olden times of the Company, when Indian appointments were hereditary, cannot thus compare the past with the present. Hence the absurd reference to past antipathies and suspicions, and quota- tions from witnesses of a former age. Let me give two illustrations of this change of feeling towards Christian institutions and Christian converts, within the present generation. When I visited Madras in the end of 1853, Mr. Anderson, then at the head of the Free Church Institution, told me of the number of times that their schools had been emptied for months, — after the baptism of a single convert, even of compara- tively low caste. But how is it now? Only little more than a year ago two high-caste Brahmin youths attending the Chris- tian College were publicly baptized together, and yet not one student left the institution for a single day. Such was the change in that brief interval. The second illustration is equally significant. Ata meeting of the Free Church in Madras in 1853, my friend, the Rev. Mr. Anderson, pointing to an interesting young female convert, told me of the desperate efforts made by her parents to prevent her from entering the Christian Church—how, when arguments, entreaties, and tears failed to move her from her purpose, they applied to the courts of law, and perjured themselves by swearing that she was under age, and thus incapable legally of acting for herself. When this was proved false, and the judge decided in her favour, her brother sprang like a tiger over the bar, and with his hands clasped round her throat, strove with such desperate energy to strangle her as they rolled on the floor of the court of justice, that the utmost efforts of the Xi police all but failed to frustrate his deadly attempt to murder his sister. Now, what do we find? There is still keen oppo- sition to apostasy, and bitter grief over those whom they regard as lost. But the intensity and fanaticism of the old times are neither displayed nor felt. So great is the change, that the converts can now visit on friendly terms the homes they have left; and in that same town of Madras, we know of one or two instances, in which Christian converts have been able to remain in their homes, at the request of their heathen rela- tives, who only required them to prepare and eat their food apart, lest they should destroy the caste of the other members of the family. Such an arrangement twenty years ago would have been simply an impos- sibility. The whole family would have been thrown out of caste, and out of society: even life would have been insecure. The painful fact is, that the opposition to Mission- aries and their work can generally be traced, not to natives, but to degenerate foreigners. Godless or timid Englishmen often raise a false report of opposi- tion to mission-work, or excite the natives to oppose it, when otherwise they would never think of doing so. As the late Lord Lawrence said, ‘‘ Christian truth, spoken in a Christian spirit, will never give offence to the people of India.”’ The Director himself gives a most telling contradic- tion of his own assertion, that the natives are hostile to Missionary institutions. When quoting from a high authority for another purpose, in connexion with the needed quotation, the following sentence occurs :— ‘With regard to the Despatch of 7th April, 1859, Mr. Arbuthnot,’’ then Director of Public Instruction Xii - in Madras, ‘‘reported that -no objection existed to Mission schools, except in a few localities, in which suspicions as to the views and policy of the Govern- ment on matters of religion HAD BEEN SUGGESTED BY TUROPEANS. BE Siig iy STATE OF THE HIGHER EDUCATION. BrrorE drawing any inferences, or in any way prejudging the question, let us first glance at the positions occupied by the different Educational Institutions of the higher class in Madras. Here, as in Calcutta and Bombay, there is an University, University. which takes no part in direct teaching, but has an important place as the great regulating and controlling power in the higher education, and confers degrees and other rewards on successful students from the different colleges. It is formed on the model of the London University, with its affiliated colleges. As we have no intention to interfere with this valuable institution, we shall not waste time in describing _ its constitution or working. First in order of rank we must place the Presidency College, Presidency established in 1858, attended, according to the last official Colese. Report, by 154 undergraduates. It is entirely in the hands of the Government. With the exception of a trifling endow- ment, and the small amount got in “fees and fines”’ from the students, it is supported out of the Imperial Treasury. Its Professors are appointed, paid, and after a certain term of service, pensioned, by the Government. It has not only the large revenue, but all the dignity and prestige of a State institution, and, basking in the smile of Presidential favour, it occupies a vantage-ground which renders competition hazardous and arduous. While it is fostered by Government, one of the great objects contemplated in the Despatch of 1854—the encouragement of native enterprise and self- reliance in the higher culture —is practically impossible. In addition to the college department there is a school, B Christian College. - Other Institutions. 2 with a higher and middle class, recently started as feeders to the college, the former attended by 121, and the latter by 64 pupils. We shall have something to say about this latter feature before we have done. Next in order of rank, though prior in time,' and higher in numbers, comes the Christian College, with 245 under- graduates. Its present constitution is thus described by the “Director of Education ” in his Report for 1875,— “Some important changes have been made in the constitution of the central institution of the Free Church of Scotland. The college, which is ‘to be regarded as now representing more or less directly all the Churches of the Reformation, will be henceforth known as the Free Church Insti- tution and Madras Christian College.’ ‘The Church Missionary Society and the Wesleyan Methodist Missionary Society have agreed to give pecuniary help to the institution,’ and ‘ the funds available are expected to secure as a minimum staff for the Collegiate Department, five Professors, with two Assistant Professors, and such Pundits as may be from time to time required.” ‘The ideal aimed at’ is ‘ that of a college separate from any school department, and not dependent on any one church or missionary society ’” (p. 21). The Free Church Educational Institution, from which the Christian College sprung into a more systematic form in 1865, and assumed its present Catholic character in 1876, still keeps up its reputation, having in its higher department 195 students training for the matriculation standard ; in the middle department, 398; and in the lower, 255; giving an aggregate of 1089 under instruction, against 327 in the Government Institution. We shall not occupy our time in describing the only other institutions which keep up a collegiate department. The Doveton Protestant College, with its 20 students, and the Sulivan’s Gardens Seminary, with 12, occupy a useful walk of their own. Neither shall we do more than refer to the valuable institutions supported by the different religious societies of England and Scotland, engaged in the same good work, and, according to the testimony of the Madras Govern- ' This college is set down in the Report as having been established in 1865. This is only a date which marked a change in the arrangement of an institution which had existed from 1837, and had a collegiate character and did collegiate work before Government came to compete with it. 3 ment, “rendering noble service” in the education of the natives. Six of these societies, with 1548 of the youth of India under instruction, have laid aside all rivalry, save that of striving which shall best serve their God and the country of their adoption; and believing that one strong Christian College is better than a number of weak ones, they limit their course of study to preparing their pupils for matri- culation, and trust their future training to the Christian College, to which some of the societies at home now contribute liberally, although the larger share of the burden still falls on the Free Church. This one college costs the churches of this country more than £2000 a year—a noble contribution towards the highest form of Christian culture. The only other educational institution to which I need call attention is the interesting and important one which bears the name of its founder, Pacheapah, a native of Madras, who Pacheapah’s Institution. left a very large sum to build and endow an institution in. which the language, literature, and sciences of Europe were to be taught, as he vainly hoped, in harmony with the religions and the caste systems of the Hindus. It was founded in 1842, and has been kept up with ability and success. Its managers have hitherto been content to educate _up to the matriculation standard, but while we write, we have just heard that a college department has been estab- lished, of which we shall speak again. By last Report they had as many-as 177 students in the higher department, and 369 in the middle. It is an interesting fact that, although the money was left by a bigoted Brahmin, in order to crush the mission school of that day, the large proportion of the students who graduate now, go direct from the heathen school to the Christian College. This purely native insti- tution, supported by native contributions and guided by native talent, though they wisely employ accomplished English teachers in the highest departments, has done good service in the past, and is destined to do important work in the future. By assuming a collegiate character at this time, in the face of the strong Christian and Government colleges, with their established reputations, it has shown a courage and enterprise which speak well for the spirit of the B 2 Christian College preferred. Difference in cost. a managers. We shall show, before we close, the important place which this institution is fitted to occupy. In the mean- time we must confine our attention to the two colleges which have for many years occupied the field. In comparing these two institutions we are at once struck with the fact that, in the midst of a community of Hindus and Muhammadans, the Christian College in which the Bible is taught daily, is, notwithstanding, more popular than the Government College, from which religion is strictly excluded. This fact is brought out by the tables in the Government Report, Nos. I. and IX. In these the attendance at the Christian College is given at 245, while at the Presidency College it is only 154. With this superiority in numbers the true elements of native society are faithfully represented. In the Presidency College there were 142 Hindus, 4 Muham- madans, | European, 6 East Indians, and | Native Christian. In the Christian College there were 202 Hindus, 6 Muham- madans, 1 European, 1 East Indian, and 35 Christians. That this marked preference for the Christian over the Government College is not to be accounted for, as is some- times said, by the difference in the fees, is obvious to every unprejudiced mind. The difference in Madras is so small, it cannot materially influence the attendance. In Calcutta it may be more felt. There the monthly fee in the Presidency College is 12 rupees, while in aided colleges it is only rupees. But in Madras, instead of being less than half, or a difference of 7 rupees a month, the difference is only 1} rupees. In the Presidency College the charges are from 5 to 4 rupees. In the Christian College they are from 34 to 2¢ rupees. While we may admit that the difference in charge does to a certain extent weigh in the choice, it is a grand mistake to suppose they are so hostile to the teachings of Bible truths and Bible morality, as is often alleged. Many of the best natives prefer the teaching of Christianity by a missionary to the absence of all religion in a Govern- ment College. The next thing with which we are struck in these tables is the vast difference in the cost of education in these insti- tutions. We quote from the Official Report for 1877. “The 5 154 students of the Presidency College were educated at the total cost of 71,890 rupees. The 245 pupils of the Christian College were taught for 49,000 rupees. The items are equally instructive. ‘The Presidency College received from Govern- ment the large grant of 62,252 rupees. The Christian College got only the small sum of 5096 rupees. The former had an endowment yielding 1848 rupees. The latter has none. But on the other hand, while the former did nothing to call forth the liberality of the natives or Europeans, the latter received in subscriptions and donations the sum of 12,360 rupees. The Government College, attended almost exclusively by the rich, raised 7795 rupees in “fees and fines,” the Christian College 5964 rupees. - But the most noteworthy columns in the elaborate tables are those which give the cost of each pupil in the different institutions. They bring out in bold relief the vast difference between the extravagance of Imperial management and the economy of private enterprise. The total cost of each student in the Presidency College was that year 485 rupees. The total cost of each pupil in the Christian College is set down at 141 rupees. But as I think there is an omission of the cost to the Churches in this. country, I give the benefit of the doubt, and set down the total cost of each at 204 rupees, a great deal less than half. Still more striking is the contrast when we compare the cost of each pupil to the Imperial Treasury. In the Presidency College it was no less than 412 rupees a head per annum, and as it takes four years to cram these heads with the amount of learning required to take a degree, we can easily calculate the cost of each graduate to the Government. In the Christian College, the cost to the Imperial Treasury of each student was only 30 rupees per annum; so that they educate thirteen students for one year for the sum paid for one in the Presidency College for the same time. But we may be told this is not a question of expense. Results com- This is not the only, nor even the most important, in aot eas matter so grave as the education of the youth of India. The question, it is alleged, must be viewed in the light of the results of education, rather than of the numbers who pass 6 through the course of study, and the cost of that course. Moral results. What, we may be asked, is the quality of the education Tntellectual results. 1st. given at these two colleges? What can be said of the moral stamina and character of the youths who graduate at each? Which produces the best men and the most loyal citizens ? I must leave these two last queries, the most important of all, unanswered. I have not sufficient data for a conclusive reply, and I dislike doubtful decisions. It is true I feel morally certain that, if this matter were investigated, it would lead to a verdict in favour of the Christian College. The eternal laws which regulate mind and morals constrain us to believe that the men of known Christian character and beneficence, who daily hold up before their pupils an example of devout faith and purity, along with a standard of Divine authority for faith and morals, must exert an influence for © good far greater than others, however respectable, who do not, and dare not, teach any creed as a substitute for that which they are undermining in the minds of their pupils by every lesson they give, and who are not allowed, even if they inculcate morality or loyalty, to base their teaching on any standard which would command the respect or reverence of a thoughtful mind at the age of inquiry and doubt. But I will not take advantage of such a line of reasoning. I am content to rest the issue on facts which can be tabulated and reckoned with arithmetical accuracy; and shall again take the tables and statements in the last published Report issued by the Madras Government, regretting only that there is none later than that for 1876-7. I shall give the results of the University Examinations for the different degrees, including that for Matriculation. In the Matriculation Examination there passed,— 1875-6. 1876-7. First | Second Total. |! Glass. Class. | Total. First | Second Class. | Class. | Presidency College . . 4 25 29 7 39 AG Christian College . . at 20 22 8 42 50 er | 7 In the first Arts Examination there passed,— : 1875-6. 1876-7. Beem | Became | Gi | gue) reo Presidency College . . 7 14, 21 7 13 20 Christian College . . 4 24 28 6 21 | 27 In the University Examination for B.A. there passed,— 1875-6. 1876-7. Giass. | Class. | Class, | TOL || Giass. | Claes. | Class. | TO! Presidency College .| 1 | 18 5 | 19 15h) Mle esG Christian College s{". /4 3 4 7 1 8 4 13 In the examination for the highest degree conferred, that of M.A., the Report merely states (p. 14) that five candidates presented themselves for examination, and three passed, but no indication is given, as in all other cases, from what college they came. It was only in looking over a table in the Ap- pendix, p. 174,Table 25a, that I found that not one of the three came from a Government college; only two were from Madras, and of these one was “from the Christian College and private study,” and one “ from private study.”. The third was also from an aided college in the country and private study. We have now given the leading facts in regard to the higher education in the Government, and in the only aided college in Madras, which can properly be compared with it, and we have seen that, while the results are favourable to the former numerically, the superiority is so slight as to make it obvious that there is no reason for keeping up an institution which costs so much, and which, as we shall show, stands in the way of so much good. If we look a little more closely into this apparent superi- ority of the Presidency College, we shall find that it is not based on any real superiority in the teachers or the teaching, 2nd. B.A. ¢ 3rd.) B.A 4th. M.A. Apparent, not real supe- riority. Results com- pared, Ccat com- pared. 8 but is altogether owing to adventitious circumstances, which give it an unfair advantage, and which are strong arguments for its abolition or transference to other hands. Before accounting for the apparent superiority in results, let us see wherein it consisted. According to their own official returns of the entire number passed at all the University Examinations for 1876-7, 96 were from the Presidency, and 91 were from the Christian Institution. Only a majority of 5. In the Matriculation and the F.A. Examinations the Christian Institution had the majority. In the M.A. it had one, the Presidency College had none. The only instance of a majority in favour of the Presidency College was in the B.A. degree, when they had 30 against 13 in the other college. But even here the Christian College had one in the first class where the other had none; and in the second class they were only beaten by 7. The numbers being 15 and 8 respectively. It was in the third or lowest class that the Presidency College had the largest majority— 15 against 4. Is this an advantage of such vast importance as to justify the keeping up of a college in opposition to both the letter and spirit of the Government Despatch to which it owes its origin ? Is it worth the price paid for it? Look at what it costs to gain this absolute majority of 5 in all the examina- tions, or even the majority of 15 in the B.A. Take it in the most favourable ight, leaving out of account the matricula- tion pass, the number passed in the college department proper was in the three degrees conferred as follows :— FA. B.A. M.A. Total. Presidency College. . . 20 30 iter 50 Christian College . . . 27 13 1 Al And to maintain this college, which had a majority of 9 who took degrees at the University Examinations,—-all of whom were in the lower class of the B.A., and only passed 4) by the “skin of their teeth,’—the Government paid 62,890 rupees, while the other college only cost the paltry grant of 5096 rupees. But how is this small superiority in the number obtaining How degrees accounted for? Not by any superiority in the mage ee teaching, but principally by two well-known causes, which are neither a credit to the college nor an argument for its continuance. Ist. The first is one well known to every man acquainted Imperial with India—the great desire of the natives to be connected with Dae any institution or service under the Government. The feeling is a natural one and not unknown in other countries, but it is peculiarly strong in the Asiatic mind and under Paternal Governments. It is thought there must be better chances of getting into Government employment when brought up in a Government College. Besides, the dignity of being a graduate of the Presidency College is of itself of much value, even if it gives no better chance of a degree or reward. The consequence is what might be expected. The ablest students in the preparatory classes, when they pass the Matriculation Examination, are powerfully drawn to the Government College; and if the private college be not spe- cially attractive, all the best scholars pass it by, and it is a striking proof of the merit of the Christian College, and the powerful hold the professors have of the minds and hearts of the youth of Madras, that with such a disadvantage, and only a trifling difference in the fees, they not only have a large majority of graduates, but that they tread so close on the heels of their august rival in the number of those who take degrees. The professors often speak of their surprise at the fidelity and affection of the students who stick so closely to them under such powerful influences to draw them away. 2nd. The second cause of the apparent superiority in the The English Presidency over the aided college is the employment of the #2sase. English language in teaching and examinations. We shall be asked, since this is the same in both, how can it give an advantage to the one over the other? The answer is simple. Mistakes in English. 10 If it is found that in the one the students have been born and brought up in families in which English is taught and spoken, so as to make it much more of a “ mother tongue ”’ than is the case of those attending the other, it will at once be seen, that in both study and examinations this gives a great advantage, and the college gets all the credit of it. That the Presidency College has this great but adventitious advantage is well known ; it appears on the face of Govern- ment Reports. Inthe Return laid before Parliament in 1870, it is stated, that ‘‘ while the students attending Government and aided colleges are of the same class, it 7s the richer portion who attend the Government College.’ Now it is well known, that in the Presidential cities the richer classes very gene- rally know and speak English, and all of them who wish their children to study European literature and science, take pains to teach them the English language from their earliest years. The poorer classes, who are sent to the aided colleges, seldom know anything of English until they go to school, and do not hear it spoken in their homes. In the same Return it is shown that a large proportion of the children of “Government servants and pensioners” attend, as might be expected, the Government colleges, and most of these children are familiar with English from their infancy. We do not say that all who attend the Presidency College have this familiar knowledge of English, or that all who attend the aided College are destitute of it; but we do say that the Government colleges are attended by a very much larger proportion of those who have this great advan- tage, and that this is sufficient to account for the difference in results, so far as regards the taking of degrees. An amusing, but most instructive illustration is given in one of the Reports of an Inspector of Schools in the Madras Presidency, showing the difficulty under which the student labours in an examination, when he is not familiar with idiomatic English. The question was-—“State how the two points first marked on the thermometer are obtained ?”’ We cannot give the entire quotation, but when we repeat the examiner’s statement, that out of more than 700 candi- dates only 128 answered it correctly, we think we may 11 attribute not a “small,” but a large “ part” of the failure to “ignorance of English.” He says,— “Some small part of the failure is probably due to ignorance of English. Even separate words are often misunderstood. The article I have quoted speaks of pounded ice. This is often changed into ‘a pound of ice.’ Again, a great number show plainly enough that they take ‘pounded’ to mean the same thing as ‘melted.’ In the same article of the primer, the author says, ‘Get a glass blower to blow a hollow bulb at the end of a tube of glass, &c.’ This is very frequently changed as follows :—‘ Take a glass tube, then take a glass blower, &c.’ And when they have taken him they treat him in a way that shows clearly enough they do not regard him as belonging to the animal kingdom. They pour mercury into him, heat him over a flame, fill him with mercury vapours, and finally hermetically seal ‘his open end! Others cover him with wax, prick him with pins, and plunge him in various acids. One youth dips him in sulphuric acid, and then (as he very justly remarks) ‘it will have clear marks upon it, the acid having such a tendency.’ ” If we take the element of prestige as well as of language into account, the wonder is, not that the Presidency College has a trifling superiority in the number of successful candidates for degrees, but that it has not far more. It is a matter of surprise that the aided college can stand alongside it at all. But at this stage the question may be put, Is Government About at liberty to give up its secular college in favour of a °UTalty- Christian one? Granting that the Christian College is all you represent it to be, and that it is quite capable of providing the higher education for all the youths of Madras who desire it, would it not be unfair to a heathen people to employ their money to support an institution professedly set up for the purposes of proselytism ¢ To such questions I might give many answers, and it would be easy to show that the charge of proselytizing might be brought against the secular colleges of the Govern- ment in a worse form than against those of the Church. To convert the youth of India from their ancestral faith to the blank condition of a negation of all religious belief, which mere secular instruction inevitably tends to do, is more dangerous than to convert them to the Christian faith, and the best of the Hindus are now convinced of this. I might show that to leave a Christian college in undisputed possession of the field it had been the first to enter, and which it has Native insti- tutions. A native college set up.. 12 occupied for more than forty years, is no injustice when it had done its work to the entire satisfaction of the natives— so much so, that with the exception of a few rich men, who from fashion and interest, rather than conviction, go to the State institution, the larger portion of the population prefer the Christian College. But I set aside these and other considerations, and call attention to another fact of great interest and importance. I take other and impregnable ground. [I call attention to the fact, that there isin Madras an institution which is quite capable of providing the higher education for such of the heathen—and they few—who might be unwilling to send their children to the Christian College. That institution, Pacheapah’s High School, has been in existence since 1842, and has been kept up with vigour and good results. In the examination for Matriculation, the highest standard they had aimed at up to the date of the last Report, they passed only four fewer than the Presidency preparation department of the same order, and seven fewer than that of the Free Church, while it stood higher than either in the first class. The numbers were as follows :— Passed. Examined. ‘ny : Glass |) Olsgpet | Total Free Church High School . . 68 7 43 50 Presidency do. <—¥ 58 ‘f 40 47 Pacheapah’s do. ie 53 10 oo 43 Even if we had no other evidence than this of the efficiency of this institution and its fitness to provide a good education for any who might regret the withdrawal of the Presidency College, it would be enough to justify the step. But we have better evidence to give. We have just learned from a correspondent in Madras that the managers of Pacheapah’s institution have added a collegiate department, and are now prepared to prove their ability to educate to the highest standard. Hitherto they had stopped short of this bold step, first of all from the feeling that the work was not absolutely necessary, and would be extremely difficult, in face of 13 such powerful opposition as that offered by the Government on the one hand, and the Christian College on the other. And another feeling, we have good reason to believe, kept them back,—a feeling of loyalty. They, like many of the natives of India, had, I am informed, the impression, that Government wished to keep up its own colleges, and that it would be interpreted as a disloyal thing to set a college of their own up in opposition to them. That such an impres- sion should prevail is not to be wondered at, when we consider the lavish way in which Government colleges are kept up and favoured, while aided colleges are stinted and frowned on in many instances by the Directors of Education. But recent discussions on the right interpretation of the Despatch of 1854 have opened their eyes, and emboldened them to take the decisive step. It is a most instructive fact that they have done this within a few months of the time when the Director of Education, in an elaborate document, attempted to prove that, if the Government College were withdrawn, there was nothing for the people of Madras but to depend wholly on the Christian College for the higher education, and when the Government had expressed their opinion that the natives were incapable of educating them- selves, and that they dare not leave them to the proselytizing Christian College. When the Director of Education maintains, that if the A false issue Government College were to be discontinued, the natives raised, would have no alternative but to attend the Christian Col- lege, or give up all hope of the higher education, he raises a false issue, and misleads the Madras Government, which echoes his gratuitous assertion. There was no ground for it in the facts of the case, and there was not a shadow of foundation for it in the memorial presented to Government by the missionaries. They asked for the proper treatment of ‘‘ aided institutions” of all kinds, and never sought any special advantages for themselves. In their second commu- nication they most expressly disclaim any desire to deprive the natives of a secular education, if they wish it. The prayer of the first memorial to ‘‘ His Grace the Governor in Council,’ is stated in the first sentence to be ‘“ with The Council accepts the false assumip- tion. Value of this judgment. Evidence of facts. 14 reference to the working of the grant-in-aid system,” and at the close they ask his Grace “to give free opera- tion to the grant-in-aid scheme, framed in accordance with the policy declared in the Despatch of 1854,” and all the other matters referred to are in harmony with this, In the second, which is a reply to the answer of the “Director,” as indorsed by the Council, they say, ‘The Director appears to ascribe to the memorialists a feeling of hostility to the Presidency College. We entirely disclaim any such hostility, and we are clearly of opinion that it should not be withdrawn without a secular aided college to take its place.” They add, ‘‘ Cases might arise in which it might be inexpedient to leave a town or district dependent for education on a mission school alone. Each case would have to be wisely dealt with on its own merits. We repudiate the charge which the Director makes against the missionaries of Southern India, of seeking to drive Govern- ment to commit a breach of its avowed policy of religious neutrality. We are as anxious for real neutrality on the part of the Government as any one can be. We should strongly deprecate anything that would practically drive the children of unwilling parents, few as we believe they are, into mission schools, though the Director represents this as the one aim of the memorial.” We regret much that the Council in Madras has accepted this false and misleading view of the aim of the memorial of the missionaries. ‘They say that the “ speedy suppression of Government schools of the higher class . . . could not but have the effect of making the population for the present, and probably for a long time to come, mainly, if not solely dependent upon missionary institutions, for what may be call upper and middle education. ‘They further think it beyond question that the alternative, as regards superior education above the merest primary instruction, is between Government schools and missionary schools.” With all deference to Government authorities, we cannot shut our eyes either to the evidence of facts or the testimony of competent witnesses. As to facts, it is notorious that aided native schools of the higher class are now able not only to exist 15 alongside of, but to compete with Government colleges, and in some cases to beat them, as we have seen in Madras itself, in the case of Pacheapah’s school, when in 1877 they passed 10 in the first class of the Matriculation, in a year in which the Director admits the examination was exceptionally severe, against 7 who passed from the Presidency School; and the A native col- same school now replies to these injurious judgments by 7PES ResUa: beginning a competition with the Government in the college, as they have long done in the school department. In the second memorial to the Governor in Madras, signed by nine missionaries as representatives of all the Protestant missions in Southern India, we find the following confirmation of these views. “Schools and colleges,” they say, “under local, yet not missionary, management, already exist and prosper in many parts of Southern India. We need not refer to the colleges at Trevandrum and Ernacclum, both under native management, yet both holding a most distinguished place among’ the institutions affliated to the University of Madras. Nor need we refer to the long-continued and uninterrupted prosperity and usefulness of Pacheapah’s High School... . In nearly all the districts of the Presidency it is abundantly shown how much interested and how successful native gentlemen and native committees may become in the manage- ment of colleges and schools. The Hindu College at Tinnevelly, the College at Coimbatore, Vizagapatam, and Vizianagram, the Hindu Proprietary School, the Anglo- Vernacular School in Triplicane, the Hindu High Schools at Masulipatam, Nellore, Bezwada, Narsapur, the Town School in Coimbaco- num, Pacheapah’s branch schools at Chedumbaram and Conjeveram, are examples of what the native community are well able to effect in this line, when encouragement is given them ”’ (p. 6). I make no comment on these facts, accompanied as they are by the calm judgment of men of practical knowledge, whose life-work in India is disinterested beneficence. They are worth a bushelful of assertions. There is another significant fact which the Government presidency seem to have overlooked. In 1875-6 the Director of Educa- es needs tion added a “ middle-class ” department to their institution, FOR Violation of Despatch of 1854. 16 whica formerly consisted of a college and higher class only. And the reason assigned for this addition was, as admitted by the educational authorities, that ‘it was needed as a feeder to the College.” The Director was forced to acknowledge that the College was losing ground, and that the only way to keep their position was to enter into competition with the aided schools, in order to draw students by personal influence away from them into the Government College. This was a flagrant violation of both the letter and spirit of the Education Act. The obvious duty of Government was to hail this tendency on the part of the natives to edu- cate themselves. But instead of encouraging the spirit of independence, the Director of Education does his best to crush it out, in order that he may foster the Presidency College. That this is his aim and spirit is manifested not only in the Reports which he draws up, but by his appearing on the platform at public meetings to advocate the claims and defend the pet institution against all opponents. That the Director and, under his influence, the Education Department in Madras, do not hold the balance even, as regards Government and missionary institutions, is shown by the following sentence from the Memorial, openly and officially published in Madras, where contradiction would have brought confusion upon their profession, and ruin to their plea. After giving sixteen instances in which colleges and high schools had been carried on with success by the natives, they say :— “These colleges and schools were encouraged and, in some cases, diligently fostered by the Educational Department. They therefore came into existence and are now maintained with ease, though some of them have to stand a pretty severe competition with the Mission Institutions by their side. We are not aware of an instance in which such aided schools have been encouraged in the same way, either in the room or by the side of a Government school, except in the single one of the town school at Coimbaconum, when the Government school had become overcrowded, and when it was well known that the new institution would act as a feeder to it.” Private correspondents tell me of stronger evidences of partiality, and of the positive discouragement of private 17 enterprise, when it comes into competition with Government institutions; but being private I cannot produce it in evidence. That this is done from a sense of duty I do not doubt. But that one who is placed in such a position should feel himself at liberty to assume such an attitude 1s much to be regretted. As “ Director,” by the rules of the Despatch of 1854, he is bound to do all he can to foster aided schools and colleges, and to teach the natives of India to educate them- selves in the higher departments, and set free the funds de- voted to education for the elementary instruction of the poor. If we turn to the evidence of competent witnesses, it will Evidence of be no disrespect to either the Government or the Director if beats I quote, in direct contradiction of these assertions, the calmly expressed opinions of the large number of missionaries who signed the Memorial to the Governor of Madras. It bears the names of 15 or 18 missionaries. Most of these have been longer in the country than the Director or members of the Council. They are men who have devoted their lives to the. welfare of India. They know the language of the natives. They mix with them to an extent and with a freedom unknown in official circles, especially in the present day. They are far more competent to judge of what the Hindus can and would do than any body of Government officials possibly can know, however anxious to get informa- tion. These men are unanimous in the opinion, that the natives are capable of managing the higher education, if only they were encouraged to do it and were freed from the unfair competi- tion of Government institutions. They say in their second Memorial, ‘‘It is by institutions managed by local committees, Memorial which would consist in most cases of Hindu gentlemen, that "0" Missiow we think Government institutions ought generally to be re- placed. It is for the good of the country at large, not for the special benefit of mission schools, that we desire the policy of the Despatch acted on. ... We believe that if encouragement were given, many existing Government schools might be at once transferred to the management of C Government pre-occupied. 18 local non-missionary bodies. We believe that if this pro- cess were once begun, it might go on steadily, if not very rapidly, until the need for any institutions being maintained by Government had manifestly ceased. We believe that such a process, with such a result, would be useful in many ways, and was unmistakably desired by those who framed the Despatch of 1854. It was for the setting on foot of such a process that the Memorial pleaded. Thus if the real aim of the missionaries be kept in view, the twenty-four pages in which the Director revives the groundless charges that have been often brought at various times against missionary education and the aims of missionaries, will be seen to have no bearing on the matter in hand” (p. 5). So valuable is this evidence of these most competent of all witnesses, that I must quote another sentence to the same effect. They add :— “The Director of Education simply takes for granted, that the only alternative is between a Government and a Mission Institution ; but we submit that such a view is out of harmony with the facts of the case. Hindu gentlemen are too sensible of the advantages that India derives from the British Government, and too loyal, to open schools in direct opposition to the desires of a Government department; but if that department encouraged them, they would, in many cases, undertake the duty cheerfully, and we are sure that when once undertaken they would feel an interest in it, and discharge it with constantly-increasing vigour and success. We are sure, also, that the management of such schools and colleges would have the happiest effect on the community in many ways.” The fact is, the Council of Madras is so occupied with urgent matters which it must attend to, and others which it deems of greater importance,that it does not find time to attend personally to this Education Department ; or, perhaps, think- ing that it is better left in the hands of professional teachers —a natural but most mistaken notion—leaves the whole matter in the hands of the Director of Public Instruction and his friends. That this is the case comes home to me most painfully in 19 my efforts to get the most recent information. The latest “Report on Public Instruction,’ in the Presidency of Madras, is as far back as 1876 and the beginning of 1877. I applied to the ‘ India Office,” where every facility for information is obligingly and promptly given, but was told that “no later Report had been sent home.” I wrote toa friend in Madras, to get and send meacopy. He informs me that “the Madras Council had not yet considered and recorded a minute on the Report for 1877-8, and it could not be issued to any one until that was done.” That Report—a most valuable and important public document—got up with great labour and expense, has been lying on the Council table for a year and a half unnoticed. The Report for 1878-9 must have been in the hands of Government for many months ; of course it cannot be considered before that of the previous year, and as these Reports are made up to the end of March in each year, that for 1879-80 must now be in preparation. I do not blame the Madras Council, nor would my readers, if they saw these Reports—large octavo volumes of about 400 pages, crammed full of details alike intricate and important, bristling with figures which require much time to compare, and technical knowledge to appreciate; and supplemented with an array of “tables,” enough to satisfy the voracious appetite of a statistician, more than enough to appal the heart of an ordinary man, much more of a man engrossed with other important affairs. Ido not wonder that honest men should scruple at giving a hasty deliverance, and delay in giving any deliverance at all. While I do not blame, I do regret that a matter so important as the education of a great country should be left in such an unsatisfactory condition, without a special depart- ment, where men of statesmanlike views, and independent and disinterested character, could control and direct education and educators alike. But I cannot enlarge on this important subject. I trust I have said enough to account for the Madras Government seeming to approve of the policy and statements of the Director, in a case in which they are under a necessity of giving a hasty decision on an urgent appeal. ) c 2 Do not blame the Council. The stability of aided insti- tutions. 20 As to the statements of the Director, they are more than met by the facts adduced, and by the testimony of competent witnesses ; and when I call attention to the further consider- ation that those who signed the Memorial were the chosen representatives of nearly all the missionaries of Southern India, most of them not personally engaged in education, the evidence should satisfy all reasonable men who know their character ; and as for their work, the Madras Government, in that same document, speaks of “the magnificent efforts made by missionaries for the education of the people of India.” There is only one question which remains for considera- tion. Is there sufficient security for the permanence of the aided institutions? If the Presidency College were to be withdrawn, will the Christian College and the Native Insti- tution be kept up with such efficiency as to meet the wants of the people and the demands of Government ? The following considerations seem sufficient on this point :— Ist. Both of these institutions were in existence, and were giving a good and high class education, long before the Government College was established. The Christian College, which is very unfairly set down as having only originated in 1865, is in reality the development of that institution which was established in 1837—eighteen years before the Presidency College was set up; and many noble youths had received a high education for services in eccle- siastical, professional, and even Government employment from the first. If they existed before that of Government was established, when education was in its infancy, why should they not survive its removal when education has reached maturity ? 2nd. The Christian College, which has stood. for forty years, has not only kept its ground, but has gone on im- proving, until it has become the largest, and, in the opinion of competent judges, the best college in Southern India, and the Native Institution was never so efficient and life-like as it is now. 3rd. The strongest proof of the excellence and stability 21 of these aided institutions is, that the Presidency College has been driven to assume the agressive attitude, in order to stand its ground in their presence. It has been lately driven to the necessity of establishing preparatory classes as feeders to the college, and the Director of Hducation admits that this was done to keep up the numbers of oe in classes of the Government College. 4th. But the best of all guarantees for keeping up the standard of educational efficiency in these aided colleges is the felt need for the higher education. It is an essential passport to success in life. It must be had, and the natives will have it, whether we provide it or not. It is no longer a nauseous drug to be forced down the throats of reluctant patients ; a keen appetite has been created, which will find its proper nutriment. It is not now a mere luxury, to be enjoyed by a few, it is a necessity in the commercial and political life of the people, and it must be had. Government only requires to keep up the high standard of examination for degrees in the university, and give the rewards of official employment only to competent scholars, and there is no fear but that the natives of India will find the means of getting the education required. It is high time for Government to free its hands from an expensive, unprofitable, and needless task, for which, from its professed principles of neutrality in religion, it is utterly disqualified. The higher education would be safer in the hands of the natives than in the hands of a Government professing neutrality. But for the pernicious example of Government colleges, they would never have attempted to exclude religion from their schools and colleges. ‘To them, religion is a pervading element which must permeate every part of daily life and work. I may be asked, would you wish the heathen to teach their own dark systems in the halls of modern learning ? Most assuredly not.. They are too conscious of the incom- patibility of Hinduism with the teachings of modern science to make the attempt. But those most competent to judge of the working of the native mind are of opinion, that there is such a felt want of a religious basis for morality in the 22 education of their children that, if left to themselves, they would introduce at once the teachings of natural religion, and that in a little while they would admit the Bible as their moral standard; some, even now, advocate its intro- duction, and many prefer to send their children to the Christian, in preference to the secular school or college. They fear Christianity less than they dread Atheism. Norr.—I do not enter on the important discussion as to the time when the Presidency College in Madras should be “ abolished ” or “transferred,” nor on the way in which it could be done with the greatest advantage to education and the public good. There are questions regarding property, the interests of individuals, securities for the future, &c., &c., which can only be settled on the spot. Two things we are fully authorized to call for. lst. That every reasonable effort be made by Government to foster and develope the two aided colleges in Madras. 2nd. That Government declare its determination to carry out the provisions of the Despatch of 1854 in regard to the temporary character of the Presidency College, and that steps be now taken to “abolish” or “transfer” it at the earliest date compatible with just claims and the best interests of the community. SECOND EDITION, WITH INTRODUCTION. OUR EDUCATIONAL POLICY IN INDIA. Pevicatey bp Permission TO THE RIGHT HONOURABLE THE VISCOUNT HALIFAX, P.C., G.C.B., Author of the ‘‘ Despatch on General Education in India’’ of 1854. BY THE REV. JAMES JOHNSTON. EpinspurcH: JOHN MACLAREN AND SON. Griascow: DAVID BRYCE AND SON. Lonpon: JAMES NISBET AND CO. 1880. Price One Shilling. ‘uci ét we it f is Fete he a eG ae eck Roy fsa s 5 ae = ie 7 ¢ Hee ac ere Pea “ Ane ny pat i . " es Pail ee ae pi es ey. GENERAL COUNCIL | ON EDUCATION IN INDIA. — FORMED WITH A VIEW TO THE PROMOTION OF THE 7 | GENERAL EDUCATION OF THE PEOPLE ON_A NATIONAL BASIS AS LAID DOWN IN. THE EDUCATION, DESPATCH OF 1854. “First Report, 1881. 7, ADAM STREET, STRAND, LONDON, . iF i. Veen “7 ¥ a Bas, Pye ee et - General Council on Education | in India 3 President : The Right Honourable Viscount HALIFAX, GOB, - Vice-Presidents : The Most HonptieabYs the Marquis of GuOUMONDELEY. The Right Honourable the Earl of ABERDEEN, The Right Honourable the Earl of CHICHESTER. The Right Honourable the Earl of GLASGOW. The Right Honourable the Earl of SHAFTESBURY, K.G. D. CL. The Right Reverend the Lord Bishop of DURHAM. The Right Reverend the Lord Bishop of EXETER. The Right Honourable Lord BALFOUR of BURLEIGH. The Right Honourable Lord EBURY, P.C. The Right Honourable Lord LAWRENCE. The Right Honourable the Lord Mayor W. McARTHUR, M. P. Sir THOMAS McCLURKEH, Bart; M.P. FRANCOIS: W. BUXTON, ‘Esq. ; M:P. JAMES A. CAMPBELL, Esqas, LL.D., M:P. J. P. CORRY,: Esq.,; M.P/ * DUNCAN McLAREN, Esq., M.-P. SAMUEL MORLEY, Esq., M.P. GENERAL SIR WILLIAM HILL, K. G.8.1L, Chairman: REV. JAMES, JOHNSTON, Hon. Secretary. LOCKHART GORDON, Esq., Hon. SMS hela, By whom Subser estate will be received at 7 , Adam Street, Strand, ‘The following MEMBERS OF THE HOUSE OF COMMONS have already expr essed their approval of the movement and signed the memorial to the Marquis of Harrineron, H.M. Secretary of State for India. Grora® ANDERSON, Esq., M.P. Buansamiy Armitacs, Esq., M.P. Grorce ArmritsteaAn, Esq., M.P. James W. Barcray, Esq., M.P. tight Hon. W. E. Baxter, M.-P. Josrepu C. Bonton, Esq , M.-P. Tromas. Burt, Esq., M.P. Witiiam 8. Carr, Esq., M.-P. ©, Cameron, Esq.; LL.D., M.P. JAMES Cowan, Hisq.,.M.P. - An&xanpreR Crom, Esq, M.P. CHARLES Daurymene, Hsq., M.P.; KiicHarp Davies, Esq., M-P.' James, Dickson, Esq., M.P.) Lewis L. Ditiwyn, Esq., M.P, Arcurpatp Orr Ewine, Esq.,M.P.. Anprew Grant, Esq., M.P. Tomas R. Hin, Esq., MP. Wruiram’ Hoims, Esq., M.P. Aurrep Inuineworty, Esq., M.P.» | Davip J. JENKINS, Esq, M.P. Sind. He Kiennaway, Bart, M.P: ate Br JOHN KINNEAR, MP. Tuomas Lea, abe, MOF, ¢ Epwarp ¥. Lirton, Esq., M.P. AnexanpER McArtaur, Esq.,M.P Prrer M. Lagan, Esq., M.P. Cuarues BB. Mclaren, Esq.,... Hua Mason, Esq., M.-P. .{M-P.- ALEXANDER Marupson, Esq., M.P.- /Samurn Mortuey, Esq.,M.P. «Ernest Nort, Esq., M.P. R. W. Cochran. Parniex, Esq. e Arruur Pass, Esq., M. P.[M.P, * JOSEPH W. Pease, Nsq., MEPs JOHN PENDER, Esq., M.P. - Tomas B. Porter, Esq, M.P. Josnru Puuiey, Esq., M. Ps JOHN Ramsay, Bsq., M.P. JAMES Ranxry, Esq.: M.P. PETER Rywanps; Esq. M.P. > Apu Smrre, Esq., MER. 6, Jauns ©; STEVENSON, Esq., M. e; James Srewart, Bsq., M.P. ) e Brngamin Watnwours, Esq., M. Ps 3 ook List of Members of Council see Palle 3 of. cover. A Meeting of the ‘‘ General Council on Education -in India’ was held in Edinburgh on Tuesday, 19th of May, Colonel A. G. YOUNG, Convener of the Council, in the chair. The Report having been read, and some additional information given verbally by the Secre- tary, Ist: It was moved by Sir Jonn Don WaucHore, seconded by R. A. Macriz, Esq., of Dreghorn, and unanimously agreed to, ‘“ That the Report be approved and circulated.” 2nd: It was moved by Dr. Gores Suita.C.L.E., seconded by Masor Wy zp, and agreed, “That the meeting records its thankfulness for what has been already accomplished, and pledges itself to con- tinued action, until the objects aimed at by the Council are fully carried out. BASIS OF UNION. I. The Council shall consist of those who approve of the principles of the ‘“* Despatch on Education in India,” of 1854, and who are prepared to promote the full carrying out of its provisions, especially in the following particulars :— (a) The much greater extension of Elementary Education amongst the poorer classes, which was the grand design of the Depatch, as expressed ina ‘‘ Return” laid before Parliament in 1870—‘‘ The main object of the Despatch of 1854 is to divert the efforts of the Government from the education of the higher classes, upon whom, up to that date, they had been too exclusively directed, and to turn them to the wider diffusion of Education among all classes of the people, and especially to the provision of primary instruction among the masses.” Also para- graphs 6, 10, and 39 of the Despatch. (b) The encouragement and control (rather than the direct manage- ment) of the Higher Education by Government, through the Universities, and by the system of Grants-in-Aid to Affiliated Colleges, as provided for in paragraphs 24, 25, 28, and 40 of the Despatch. (c) The gradual withdrawal by Government from direct teaching in Colleges and High Schools wherever the desire for the Higher Education is so far developed as to give a reasonable guarantee that it will be maintained with the assistance of Grants-in-Aid, and the independent efforts of the Natives, and others interested in their welfare, as laid down in paragraphs 52, 61, 62, and 86. II. The Council shall take steps through a Committee— (a) ‘To inquire into the working of the Despatch of 1854 during the past twenty-five years, since the Despatch came into operation, and to disseminate information thereon, (b) To unite all who are interested in Education in India in maturing public opinion on the subject, and in urging upon the Government at home and in India the importance of carrying out fully the principles and regulations of the Despatch of 1854. The General Council in London corsisting of sixty-two members. Major-General Sir Winuram Hitz, K.C.§8.1., Chairman. Locxuart Gorpon, Esq., Treasurer. The Rev. James Jounston, Secretary, 7, ApAM STREET, STRAND, W.C. Members of Council in Edinburgh fifty-eight. Convener, Colonel A. G. Youna. Treasurer, Major Wyup. Secretary, Colonel Dons. GENERAL COUNCIL ON EDUCATION IN INDIA. —= REPORT. Ix presenting our First Report to the public,-.it is desirable to sive a brief account of the origin of the movement, and the necessity in which it originated, the methods by which we seek to attain the objects at which we aim, and the results obtained, so far as they can be judged of at this early stage of our operations. Ist.—Tue Necessity ror such A Movement. For many years the friends of education in India have felt a growing dissatisfaction with the way in which the Education Code of the Government has been administered. While the despatch of 1854 had given satisfaction to all parties, and had been ratified after the mutiny by that of Lord Stanley, in 1859, and approved and extended by the Duke of Argyll, in 1870, it was found that, without any change of policy on the part of the Government, the administration of the Education Code had got out of harmony with its fundamental principles, and was gradually becoming more adverse to its spirit, to the ereat injury of the cause of education in the country, the well- being of the people, and even the interests of the State. (a) The primary aim of the Code, and the declared policy of every Government, have been the extension of elementary education among the masses of the people; but it is found that this department of instruction has been carried on go feebly, that it does not even keep pace with the natural increase of the population, so that there are now millions more of un- educated children in India than when the Code was established, and the rate of progress, instead of being, as it ought, rapidly on the increase, is becoming gradually slower. From 1857, when the Act had got into working order, tc 1867, the increase of pupils was at the rate of 47,000 a year; from 1869 to 1879 it was only 39,000 yearly. 2 (b) The Despatch of 1854 declared that Government ‘ there- tofore had attended too exclusively to the higher education ;” and that, while continuing to encourage and direct it, by the formation of universities and by state aid, colleges and high schools were gradually to be transferred from the direct man- agement of the state to that of local bodies, and the expenses to be largely defrayed by those who derived benefit from them, and were interested in their maintenance. But we find that colleges have been multiplied—that their cost to Government has been greatly increased—that fees of students continue to be a mere fraction of the expense—that in no one instance has a college been transferred from Government to local management, while those supported by benevolent enterprise or Christian societies have been discouraged, and that the system of grants in aid, so strongly commended in the despatch, has never been properly developed, and’is becoming every year more unsatis- factory in its administration. The grants, of small amount, are in a great many cases given or withdrawn on capricious grounds: and are hampered by arbitrary restrictions, which make them of very limited advantage to the recipients, while the spirit of self-reliance and independence on the part of the natives of India, instead of being fostered, is discouraged and repressed amongst the educated classes, who might be made the patrons and promoters of education among their country- men. (c) By rendering purely secular colleges permanent instead of temporary institutions of Government, the unsettling of the religious beliefs and the moral principles of natives at the most critical period of life, without any provision for a better faith, 1s found to be more and more pernicious ; while the large number of highly educated youth, for whom no employment suited to their new tastes and habits can be found, throws upon society a discontented and dangerous class of men, causing creat uneasiness to statesmen, of which the calls for the un-Hnglish expedient of a gag upon the native press was a painful proof. (d) The higher education, of which we feel the great im- portance for the future of India, is, in itself, gradually becoming more unsuited to the real wants of the people. Instead of being a broad and generous system for the enlargement of the mind, the strengthening of the reasoning powers, and the elevation of the moral nature, it is becoming more and more a “high pressure” system of intense and excessive study, in which the capacity for cramming the memory with undigested matter is the shortest and surest road to success in the examination, and to failure in the great aims of life; while ingenuous youths, who aim at honest and thorough mastery of the many subjets of study, run the risk of losing their degree, or of sacrificing phy- sical stamina for intellectual culture. by) These, and other evils are on the increase, and from the bureaucratic tendency of the Educational Department, and the want of proper supervision by Government, either in India or England, there is the greatest danger that the masses of the people may remain for ever in ignorance of the simplest elements of instruction for the guidance of every day life, and become more degraded under British, than they were under native, rule; while Government is wasting money on the higher educa- tion of those who are capable of educating themselves; raising an educated caste, most of whom feel no gratitude to the Govern- ment, and no sympathy for their ignorant fellow-countrymen. 2nD.—THE ORIGIN OF THE MOVEMENT. The friends of education in India had been, with little or no help from home, long and earnestly contending in vain against these growing evils and abuses of the Iiducational Code, and of late with such a feeling of despair, that it seemed as if the battle must be given up. So strong was this feeling when the movement began, by a discussion in the Mission Conference in 1878, that Dr. Mullens, as secretary, was most reluctant to allow the question to be raised. ‘‘ We have been fighting the battle in India,’ he said, ‘‘ for the last twenty years with no effect ; what is the use of beginning it here?” ‘To which the reply, appropriately given, was, ‘‘ Jt ts yust because you have failed in India that the battle must be fought here, AND, IF NECESSARY, ON THE FLOOR OF THE House or Commons.” Before this, the subject had forced itself simultaneously on the minds of some private gentlemen, and had been forced on religious societies by the unfair treatment of their educational institutions in India. General Sir William Hill and the Rev. J. Johnston, unknown to one another, had written papers in a similar vein. The Church Missionary Society issued a circular to all the societies labouring in India calling attention to the abuses, which were becoming intolerable. Forthis reason other churches were prepared to respond to a call for united action, and a full exposition of the whole case was brought before the churches and the public in a pamphlet on ‘ Our Educa- tional Policy in India,” dedicated by permission to the honoured author of the great Charter of Education in India, Lord Halifax.* In the same year a few friends met in Edinburgh, and resolved to form a Council to take up the subject. Soon a number of influential gentlemen, without regard to ecclesiastical or political parties, jomed in the movement, of which Col. Young was chosen convenor, Major Wyld, treasurer, and Mr Johnston, honorary secretary. —McLaren & Co. 4d A deputation was sent to London, consisting of the secretary and Col. Dods, who, from his intimate knowledge of the working of the education system in India, has rendered most valuable service to the cause, to seek the co-operation of influential parties there. In this they were so successful that, with the entire approval of the Council in Edinburgh, it was resolved to make London the head-quarters of the movement. A large General Council was formed, with an acting com- ~—— mittee, of which Major-General Sir William Hill was chosen chairman, the honorary secretary being transferred to London, at their request agreeing to give his gratuitous services for three years, the Council there becoming responsible for the extra expense of living in London instead of in the country, and the cost of his temporary removal. 8rp.—Tne Mrtuops BY WHICH WE SEEK TO ATTAIN THE Oxssects Armep Ar. These objects are so legitimate and desirable that it is difficult to convince those who do not know the state of matters in India that there is any necessity for any effort to attain them. They are neither more nor less than the full and honest carrying out of the principles and rules of the Despatch of 1854, which has been approved by every Government at home, and each Governor-General in India since that date. We have referred to the state of matters as they actually exist. The proofs will be found in the documents which have been now for two years before the world, and have never been called in question. The methods which we employ are, in the first instance, the diffusion of information through the press and otherwise, and the formation of a healthy public sentiment in regard to the education of the people in India, especially of the poor. This is the more necessary that there is no public opinion in India corresponding to that in this country, to check abuse, or control public action, and the uneducated masses have no means of making ieaclves heard, while the educated and educating class, ane are in general interested in maintaining the higher education, have fhe means of using the press, and can raise a clamour which men in office there cannot easily resist, while here it ig mistaken for the public opinion of the country, a fallacy of which it is difficult to dis-abuse the English mind. 2nd—By respectful Memorials to the Government of India, calling attention to the neglect and abuse of their own declared policy and express instructions. 5 38rd—By bringing the subject, if needful, before Parliament, the ultimate source of appeal. It has been in Parliament that every public measure for the education of India has originated from the days of Wilberforce and Grant, and it is full time that there should be a thorough public discussion of the working of the Despatch, which has been 27 years in operation without any official enquiry, a circumstance which of itself accounts for the growth of abuses in the administration of any public act, more especially in a country like India. In addition to seeking that a large portion of the money now spent so lavishly on the higher education, and chiefly on the higher classes, be diverted to its legitimate object, the elementary instruction of the poor, the Council will urge upon the Govern- ment the duty of setting apart, in future, of a much larger amount than in the past. for national education in India. The small sum of about THREE-QUARTERS OF A MILLION, hitherto the largest grant from a gross revenue of sIxTy MILLIONS, is altogether inadequate, and out of proportion to the imperial expenditure on other objects. In this country we devote about one-twentieth part of the revenue to the education of the people, about 2s. 6d. a head of the population. In India it is only one-eightieth part, and less than 1d. a head, of which not 4d. a head is devoted to the education of the poor, and that while Nor ong IN TEN OF SCHOOL AGE IS UNDER INSTRUCTION. Resuut oF THE Movement. It is too soon to expect much from a movement, the object of which is to act on established customs and through a settled government. But we have every reason to be satisfied with the progress made in so short a time. (a) Dirruston or Inrormation.—A large amount of informa- tion has been diffused in the most influential quarters, and has been welcomed as a valuable contribution to a most important subject too long overlooked. Upwards of 8,000 copies of the pamphlet on ‘Our Educational Policy in India,’ along with many thousands of smaller pamphlets and papers, have been circulated, besides others of larger size, such as ‘Report of Deputation to Lord Ripon,” on “The Abolition and Transfer- ence of Government Colleges,’ by the editor, who has also contributed articles to Periodicals, and a lecture before the Kast India Association in London. (6) Tue Hoprerut Union or ALL SOCIETIES INTERESTED IN Epucation in Inp1a.—It is no slight advantage to have on our General Council, as we now have, more than a hundred of the most influential members of the different Societies interested in education in India, inspired by a feeling of hopefulness in strik- ing contrast with the sense of deponaency felt two years ago. 6 (c) Pusnic EXPRESSION OF OPINION IN InpIA.—The expression of opinion in India both in reference to our movement and the objects we have in view is becoming more frequent and favour- able. Newspaper articles and the speeches of public men, indi- cate a growing sense of the neglect of education among the lower class, the evils arising from the permanent support of Government Colleges, and the injurious effects of our exclusively secular education in the higher departments. ‘The Times of India,” in an article on the subject, says yee ‘Lord Ripon was well know at home as a keen advocate of Educational reform, and in the only important speech made in England between the date of his nomination and the time of his departure he declared that education would again occupy his mind in India as a matter of paramount importance. Now that war is happily concluded, he will, as he says, have time to consider the question fully, and the important speeches made during the present progress show that he is prepared to consider it to some purpose. Indeed he boldly looks forward to a wide spread system of Education ;” referring to former attention to the higher education clauses, with the remark ‘‘ The State having devised the apex of the fabric must bring it into proper propor- tion by constructing the base.” ‘‘The Madras Mail,” in concluding lengthened and appreca- tive reviews of the pamphlet, ‘‘ Our Education Policy in India,” adds, ‘* Without endorsing all that Mr. Johnson says, it seems to us that he has made out a fair case. Itis certainly not advis- able that Government Officials should allow their desire for a symetrical system and a bureaucratic despotism to lead them to act contrary to the Despatch of 1854. Certainly it is time that this despatch were finally settled, that the managers of Articled schools should no longer remain in uncertainty with regard to the future, and that native gentlemen should be encouraged to do something for themselves and their community in the matter of education. If at present native gentlemen were to take any very active measures in this direction, they would appear to be entering into competition with a Govern- ment Department, and this they are not desirous of doing. The first step’ to encourage them would be to take away the hinderance of Government Colleges.” 1 Of the many passages which have come under our notice we | shall only quote one more from ‘‘ The People’s Friend,” a paper entirely conducted by Natives. In a leading article in their | issue of April 80th they say, ‘‘ We think it is high time that the | higher education was left to take care of itself, and that the funds so much needed for the primary instruction of the people were provided on a less niggardly scale than at present. In this very issue of our journal ample proofs can be gathered as to the fact that the middle and higher classes of this country are quite alive to the advantages of a good English education. In 7 Tanjore District and in other Southern Districts, as also in all partsof the Presidency, and notably in the Presidency Town, lots of speculation schools are springing up having for their object the providing of a pretty substantial English education, and the University and other Examination results published from time to time testify to the good work rendered by these schools. Why should not the State withdraw, in the circum- stances, from all higher instruction ? It is now too late to urge that the natives cannot manage the Higher Schools of the country. ‘The only objection in the way is departmental pre- judice, as the integrity of the Education Department once broken in upon cannot be depended upon for another five years. But it is very significant that the Kombaconum town-folk so readily offer to forego the grants they have been receiving for the Town High School, on condition of the Department abolishing the corresponding classes in the College. Indigenous enterprise should, at all costs, be encouraged, and vested interests apart, a sound statesman-like decision arrived at, in such matters. Sup- posing that the hundreds of graduates by whom the country is over-run from one end to another are ready to start Schools and Colleges, the Government ought surely to step back and allow them to do so, without standing in the way or offering eleemosyn- ary instruction in their own institutions for fear they may other- wise be deserted for the new establishments started on all sides.” The Governor-General has repeatedly spoken out boldly both in regard to the great importance of extending the lower educa- tion, the advantages of the grant-in-aid system, and his sense of the importance of religious teaching for the formation of character, as he said in addressing the Church Mission Society’s Schools in Umritsar: ‘‘No. education can be complete and thorough which does not combine religious and secular education,’ and closed his address with hearty wish for the continued prosperity and usefulness of this institution. In addressing a deputation of native gentlemen in the Punjab, Lord Ripon expressed his high approval of the system of ‘Grants in Aid,” both as an efficient and ecconomical way of spreading the higher education in useful form, and as a means of drawing the different classes of society together in a healthy and natural way, and closed with the assuring words ‘ I intend to approach this question of education in the leisure, which I hope returning peace will give me, with the most earnest desire of meeting to the utmost of my power the wish of this impor- tant community.” A high official of great experience in Calcutta, wrote to a corresponding member of our Council, “I am full of interest in your good work. The country is perfectly ripe for all you want, only it must be done at home. [If it does so, a few noisy men, who want fat situations, will make a row in the newspapers, but 8 the real feeling will be on your side.” “ That”’ our ae cae says ‘is exactly what will be the case here in Madras,” anf adds, like all who have the good of India at heart, ‘‘ my friend urges you to persevere—agitate.” One of the most honoured and influential members of the “Legislative Council in Caleutta’’ writes to the Secretary :—‘‘ I have to thank you very much for your kind note and the inter- esting papers which accompanied it. I entirely sympathize with the objects which the General Council on Education in India have in view. There cannot be two opinions as to the thorough soundness of the principles laid down in the Education Despatch of 1854, or the fact that in India we are still a long way from seeing them fully carried out, and that we require to be reminded of them. The amount spent on primary education is quite in- adequate to the requirements of the population, whilst the cost to Government of higher education is altogether excessive and unfair, and has resulted in a crop of difficulties which now engages the serious consideration of Government.” He adds, ‘the wider the grant-in-aid system can be extended, and the | sooner Government can dissociate itself from direct teaching and restrict its action to inspection of schools, and the training of normal teachers the better.’’ Sir Donald Stewart, Commander-in-Chief of the Army in India, and a member of the Council, in an admirable speech delivered at the distribution of prizes at the General Assembly’s College in Calcutta, strongly advocated the extension of National Education, and expressed his conviction that ‘‘the day is at hand when Government may, to a large extent, safely withdraw from the direct control of educational establishments. The education of the masses is a matter which must tax the energies and resources of the strongest Government to the utmost, and higher education must therefore, to a great extent, be left to itself. Those who want high education should pay for it. Im my judgment, the money raised for educational purposes should, in the main, be devoted to the requirements of the masses who raise the funds. Though the annual education grant has now reached the very respectable sum of 106 lacs of rupees, it is very far from meeting the vast requirements of the people of this Empire, and while that state of things exists, we must be careful that we do not devote an excessive portion of the grant to the education of those who can very well pay for it out of their own pockets.” We might quote many other speeches and articles of a similar tenor, but must limit ourselves to these as samples. We are aware that such sentiments have been uttered before, and that these views have long been held by these and other friends of education in India. We allude to them in connection with our movement only from the fact that they have been of late 9 uttered with the most unwonted frequency and publicity by men in the most responsible positions. Hiven if it were only a coincidence it would be a source of great encouragement, as shewing that the time for advocating the subject is opportune. But we have the best reason to know that the highest officials in India are glad of the support of public opinion in this country, as indicated and guided by a movement like ours which is loyal to the principles laid down by Government. (d) Incrgastne Interest at Home.—The growth of a healthy sentiment, and the readiness to give expressions to it in effective actions, is all that could have been expected in so short a time, and much greater than could have been anticipated with the agencies employed. There has been no attempt at raising an unreasoning prejudice against those who have not carried out the principles of the despatch of 1854 as they ought, or of fanatical and rash advocacy of impracticable measures, which would have been easier work than to raise a deliberate con- viction that matters are not as they should be, and a calmed resolve to use every legitimate means for the attainment of a necessary and reasonable effort on the part of the Government, whose duty it is to impart elementary education to the people. It is a most gratifying fact that more than a hundred men of intelligence and influence, most of them acquainted personally with India, and all of them interested in the education of the people have jomed this Council ; and that on the occasion of presenting the memorial to Lord Hartington, fifty more came forward to add their names, and not fewer than sixty-two Members or THE Houses or PARLIAMENT, WITHOUT ANY REGARD TO PARTY POLITICS AFFIXED THEIR NAMES TO THE Mermoriau, while several of the leading members of the past and present Govern- ments, who could not give their names, assured the secretary of their deep interest in our objects, and their readiness to do all in their power to assist in getting them carried out. | As a result of the spread of information throughout the - country there are thousands who realize the nature and import- ance of the subject, and who are prepared to give effect to their convictions in a practical form when the time for popular action has arrived. In the mean time we have confidence in the good intentions of the Government and of the India Council by whom our representations have been received with the greatest interest and attention. (e) Recent Increase or Grants ror Provipine Instruction. —In connection with these recent utterances in favour of the extension of education to the lower classes, we have much pleasure in calling attention to another fact, which may be a coincidence, though it is one of the great aims to which we have been directing public attention for more than two years, 10 viz., that last year’s expenditure on the primary instruction was considerably increased, and the estimates for this year are larger still. In one province alone the sum of £10,000 more than on any previous year has been appropriated to this object. Whether it has any connection with our advocacy or not is a secondary matter; we rejoice in the fact that the subject is arresting attention, and it proves what has been often denied, that much more can be done for the education of the poor, when the parties interested are thoroughly in earnest and properly supported by Government, as we doubt not they are: under the present Viceroy, and by a growing public sentiment. MEMORIALS AND DEPUTATIONS. We have the best grounds for believing that much good has been done by the memorials which the Committee and Council have forwarded in most cases by deputations to the highest authorities. They have not only been well reported by the Times and other influential papers at home, but telegraphed to India, and reported and commented on, by the principal news- papers both English and Native. Leading articles have appeared in the Indian Press on the second day after our deputation had been received in London. First.—Of the first deputation to present a memorial to The Most Hon. The Marquis of Ripon, before his departure for the Viceroyalty in India, we need give no account, as a full report was printed and circulated amongst the members, and in both England and India. We may however observe that not only was His Lordship much impressed with the facts brought to his notice, but he has, since he went to India repeatedly shewn that the impression was deep and lasting. During his lengthened tour through the provinces, he repeatedly gave expression, as we have seen, to the sentiments which he addressed to the deputation. Nothing could have been more satisfactory than the utterances of Lord Ripon, and from the deep interest he has always shewn in the education of the masses in this country we have the best assurance that he will earnestly carry out the promises he has made. Second.—A memorial was sent in August to Her Majesty’s Secretary of State for India in Council, in support of an appeal from the Christian College in Madras, which was not only favourably received, but secured an amount of attention which gave much satisfaction to the Committee, and we cannot but record our sense of the uniform kindness with which the mem- bers of the Indian Council, when approached personally or collectively, have given time and labour to any subject brought before them, affecting the education of the people, and the generosity with which they have placed at the disposal of the Secretary any works required for the study of the subject. 11 Third.—The deputation to the Hon. Mr. W. P. Adam, by the Council in Edinburgh, on his appointment to the Governor- ship of Madras, had much cause to be satisfied with the reception they met with. He said that ‘‘ the deputation had done him no small service in recalling his attention to that most important Despatch of 1854, which he looked upon as the charter of educa- tion in India. He was in India himself when that Despatch arrived, and he well remembered how it was hailed by Europeans and Natives as the herald of a better state of things as regarded the education both of the higher classes and of the masses of India. He was afraid it was too true that the behests of that Despatch had not been so carefully carried out by the different Governments of India as one could have hoped. . . . . . He to a great extent sympathized with what had been said in regard to the higher education being fostered too much to the neglect of the lower classes. . eta, If he could do anything to assist in that good work, they might be sure he would be glad to do so.” &e. , We regard it as a favourable circumstance that under the present Viceroy, himself devoted from his youth to the cause of popular education, we have in the Presidencies of Madras, Bombay, men like the Hon. Mr. Adam, and Sir James Fergusson, to co-operate with Lord Ripon, besides others in the provinces who are earnest educationalists. MemoriaL To THE Marquis oF Harrineton. Fourth.—The fourth memorial, which was presented to Her Majesty’s Secretary of State for India, was, in many respects, the most important. Its special aim was to get a thorough official enquiry into the working and the results of the Edu- cation Despatch, with a view to a more systematic and thorough carrying out of its provisions in all departments. but more especially of the primary education of the poor. This memorial was signed, in addition to the 102 members of the ‘‘ General Council,” by 52 other gentlemen of influence, in connection with societies interested in Education in India, by the Right Hon. Wm. McArthur, M.P., Lord Mayor of London, the Right Hon. Thomas G. Boyd, Lord Provost of Edinburgh, and by the Right Hon. John Ure, Lord Provost of Glasgow ; by the chairmen of the school boards in these cities, Sir Charles Reed, Bart., M.P., London, just before his lamented death, Alexander Scott, D.D., Edinburgh, and Michael Connal, Esq., Glasgow. The memorial, which was signed only by representative men, was submitted for approval to a few members of the Houses of Lords and Commons, and of these 62 authorized their names to be affixed to it, while others, who from being, or having been, members of the present or the former administration, could not sion the memorial, expressed their hearty approval of its objects, and promised their influence and assistance if the subject came before Parliament. 12 The following is the account of the deputation, abridged from The Times and Daily News, of the 7th of April :— ‘A deputation of the General Council on Education in India waited on the Marquis of Hartington at 2 o’clock yester- day afternoon at the India Office, to present to his Lordship a memorial on education in India. The deputation, which was a large one, was introduced by Viscount Halifax, and among those present were Lord Enfield, Under Secretary for India, Mr. Hobart, Private Secretary, Sir. F. Halliday, K.C.B., Sir H. Maine, K.C.8.1., D.C.L., R. A. Dalyell, Esq.,C.8.1., Sir W. Muir, K.C.8.L., members of the Indian Council; Lord Lawrence, Mr. Ram- say, M.P., Mr. A. Grant, M-P., Mr A. McArthur, M.P., Mr. Dalrymple, M.P., Sir Thomas Maclure, M.P., Mr. J. Campbell, M.P., Dr. Kinnear, M.P., R. A, Macfie, Esq., Mr. Lockhart Gordon, Mr. George Williams, Sir William Hill, the Rev. Mr. Baring. Rev. J. Barton, Major-General Ranken, Mr. Boswell, B.C.S., Captain W. Palmer, Colonel Smith, R.E., Rev. W. Gray, Rev. F. H. Baring, Mr. B. Wood Smith, Rev. R. Wallace, Mr. W. M’Kenzie, Mr. John Sharp, Mr. Alfred H. Baines, the Rey. James Johnston, the secretary, and others. The memorial called attention to the manifest inadequacy of the means now employed in India to secure the elementary education of the people, notwithstanding the comprehensive rules laid down for it in the Education Despatch of 1854. That the fundamental principles of the despatch had not been carried out was demonstrated by elaborate details, gathered with great care from all parts of the country, in a report prepared by order of Lord Mayo, by Mr. Arthur Howell, when Under Secretary to the Government of India. The memorial went on to state that— «“ ¢ Notwithstanding instructions to reduce their numbers, general colleges have increased from 14 in 1845, to 48 in 1880, of which 29 are entirely conducted by Government, and 19 are aided colleges, the latter costing Government a very small sum, while on the former upwards of £90,000 per annum is expended for the education of about 3,500 undergraduates of the richer classes for lucrative appointments, a sum nearly equal to that set apart from the Imperial treasury, for the elementary in- struction of the millions of the poor in all India.’ “The memorial further stated that while provision was made for the education of only 1,812,848 children in India, there was no provision made for 25,582,576 of school age. The memorial prayed either that a larger sum should be set aside out of the Imperial revenue for the purposes of elementary education, or that an inquiry should be made into the working of the Education Despatch, and the means which can be used for its general application, by schedules directed to three classes 18 of persons, so as to secure full and impartial information :— viz., to Directors of public instruction ; to Her Majesty's Com- missioners of Land Revenue and General Administration in the different provinces; and, tlird, to missionaries of the difierent societies labouring in India and to natives who have taken part in public efforts for the education of the people. ‘‘ Viscount Hatirax, in introducing the deputation, said that he had taken the deepest interest in the question of education in India during the last 50 years. He was sorry to say that during the whole of that period very little had been done by the Government in the direction of educating the great mass of the people of India, although some steps had been taken with the view of affording the upper classes of that country a higher grade of education. As President of the Board of Control, he had, with the assistance of Lord Northbrook and other directors of the Board, framed the Despatch of 1854, which was intended to provide for the elementary education of the people by means of a system of grants-in-aid. That system had worked well, although he was aware that it had not been so fully carried out as was contemplated by the framers of that Despatch, and he thought that the best thing that could be done was to extend the principle of that system as far as possible. “The Ruy. James Jounston, the Secretary of the Council on Education in India, after mentioning that he had received ex- pressions of regret for unavoidable absence from the Earl of Chichester, the Earl of Shaftesbury, the Earl of Aberdeen, Lord Balfour of Burleigh, the Lord Mayor of London, Mr. J. Ranken, M.P., and others, quoted the words of three of the highest officials in the service of the Government in India, to show that it was most desirable that the inquiry asked for by the memorial should be granted. One strong ground for having the inquiry was that we were not doing any- thing to overtake the education of the people, and were not, indeed, even keeping pace with the natural increase of the population. The fact was that, notwithstanding what had been done during the last 27 years, we were further from overtaking the education of the mass of the people than when we began, for while we did not add 50,000 children a year to our schools, the birth-rate added nearly 200,000 children of school age to the population of the country. «General Sir W. Hill, K.C.8.1., Chairman of The Council,” Dr. Kinnear, M.P., Mr. Ramsay, M.P., Mr. J. Campbell, M.P., the Rev. Mr. Barton, and Lord Lawrence having addressed his lordship in support of the: memorial, ‘‘Lorp Harrineton, in reply, said—I can assure you that I have heard with very great interest and attention the remarks which have been made by Lord Halifax and the other gentlemen who have addressed me. I need hardly say that any deputation 14 introduced by my friend Lord Halifax, who has taken so great and so distinguished a part in connection with everything which concerns the welfare of India, would of itself command my atten- tion. But the character of this deputation is such that even if it had been introduced under less auspicious circumstances I could not have had any doubt about the importance of the fei ments which have been made. Iwas extremely glad to hear, both from Lord Halifax and another gentleman, that there is no intention in the minds of the deputation of urging upon the Government of India any changes with the object of religious proselytism. ; : F : ‘ : : ; : I am quite ready to believe that the gentlemen who compose this deputation have no such intention in their minds ; that they are sincerely actuated by a desire to promote what must be an enormous advantage to the people of India—the spread of education. ; ; : ; P ; ; ; ; I wish very much that it had been in my power to examine more thoroughly this great question, and to speak more fully in reply to what has been said; but the fact is, that until very recently my attention since | have been in this office has not been very specially called to the question. In fact until I received a copy of this memorial which has been presented to me to-day, and a few communications from Mr. Johnston which had ‘preceded it, it had not been brought prominently before me that any con- siderable changes were, in the opimion of any large section of the community, required in the educational system of India.” After refering to.the men now at the head of the Government inIndia, such as the Viceroy, Mr. Adam, and Sir James Fer- eusson, his Lordship continued:—‘‘I think, therefore, the Government of India is at present constituted in a way which gives every guarantee that any representations such as those which have been made to-day will receive in India a very full and very fair consideration. I have also the advantage of the assistance here, as you are aware, in the Council of many men of very great experience, some of whom have paid special attention to the question, and from whom I have no doubt I shall derive very great assistance. Some of them, I am happy to say, are present to-day, and have had the advantage of hearing the views expressed by this deputation.” After an elaborate and most careful reference to the different points brought forward in the memorial, to the difficulties by which the question was beset in India, and to what had been accomplished, with an admission of shortcoming in carrying out the provisions of the Despatch of 1854 in some important par- ticulars, his Lordship concluded with these words :—“ I am not at all inclined to say that a fuller investigation of the subject: may not be necessary, but I think that the form which the inquiry should take is one which requires the most careful. con- sideration, and I am sure that you would not wish me to pledge 15 myself to any specific form of inquiry without consulting those authorities in India and others, whose opinions are of the utmost value, as to the best mode in which fuller information can be obtained. ’ I will consult the ‘Governor- Gener al and the other members of the Government in India, as well as my Council here, as to the views which you have laid before me and as to the form which any inquiry might usefully take. I think that I cannot do more at present than assure you that the important facts which you have brought so ably and temper- ately before me shall receive my best consideration. Although it is not possible for me to pledge myself to any immediate change in the existing system, or to the adoption of any special form of inquiry, until I have given it further con- sideration, I may say, in conclusion, that the matter shall be placed without delay before those who are more competent to deal with it than myself.” The deputation then thanked his lordship and withdrew. “The Council”’ feel that they owe to the Marquis of Har- tington a large measure of gratitude for having on the occasion of their representations given so much time and study to this education question, as was implied in the able speech to which the deputation listened with the deepest interest, and while they cannot acquiesce in all that he said, they are fully satisfied that his lordship could not have promised to do more than is implied in his closing words; and as the Marquis of Har- tington’s words are always carefully weighed and regulated by his intentions and ability to perform what he promises, we have good reason to be satisfied, and to leave the matter with con- fidence in his Lordship’s hands. These are some of the results of our first compaign in this important movement. It is sufficient to call forth gratitude to God for what He has enabled us to do in a difficult undertaking in so short atime. Itis more than enough to inspire courage and stimulate to hopeful effort. One thing is certain the sub- ject cannot rest at the stage it has now reached. It must be carried forward to a successful issue, or it will fall back into a more ruinous and hopeless condition than before. By every considerations of philanthropy and religion we are bound to persevere in the good work so auspiciously begun. pp. 61.1 SECOND EDITION. Our Gducational Policy indndia DEDICATED BY PERMISSION TO THE RIGHT HONOURABLE The VISCOUNT HALIFAX, P.C., G.C.B. AUTHOR OF Tur ‘“‘ DespaATcH ON GENERAL Epvucation 1n Inp1a”’ oF 1854. BY THE REV, JAMES JOURNS TORN, OPINIONS. ‘‘T have read your pamphlet with the greatest interest. You give a most accurate account of the intentions and purport of the Despatch of 1854. Viscount Hauirax. “T think the best plan would be for some time longer to appeal to the public opinion in England and India, in the way this Pamphlet is calculated to do.” 19th February, 1879. The late Lord Lawrence. Without quoting the opinions of the Press in this country, the fol- lowing from Indian papers shew how it has been received there. ‘* We have now received a Pamphlet on Edueation in India, which has probably had something to do with the interest manifested in Eng- land. Itis written by a gentleman who has evidently made a study of the subject and is thoroughly conversant with the whole history and present position of education in this country. Apart from the views advocated in the pamphlet it contains a fund of valuable historical infor- mation, a knowledge of which is indispensable in forming an opinion on the question.” —Vhe Madras Times. “The Rev. James Johnston, secretary and spokesman of the con- ference of various missionary committees which lately interviewed Lord Ripon to such good purpose in London, apnears to have written an excellent pamphlet on ‘Our Educational Policy in India,’ of which a second edition has very seasonably been presented to the public. Mr. Johnston points out, as all thoughtful Indian writers of all shades of religious opinion have done, that the true educational policy for India is that so ably sketched out in the great Despatch of 1854.”—dAnglo-Indian Guardian. Price ONE €HILLING. pp. 43.) THE DESPATCH OF 1854, ON “ General Goucation in India.” ~~ REPRINTED BY THE “GENERAL COUNCIL ON EDUCATION IN INDIA.” Prick SIxPENCcEk. pp. 34.) On tHe ‘‘ ABOLITION ” or “* TRANSFERENCE ” OF GOVERNMENT COLLEGES and HIGH oCHOOLS IN INDIA, AS REQUIRED BY THE DESPATCH OF 1854. Illustrated by the state of Education in Madras. BY THE REV. JAMES JOHNSTON, AUTHOR OF ‘‘OUR EDUCATIONAL POLICY IN INDIA,” ETC., ETC. Prick SIXPENCE. REPORT OF A DEPUTATION The Most Hon. the MARQUIS of RIPON On His APPOINTMENT AS VICEROY AND GOVERNOR-GENERAL OF INDIA. Extended from *“* The Times” of May 8th, 1880, and corrected by the Speakers. All the above to be had by post from the Secretary, 13, Highland Road, Upper Norwood, S.E. rf bo “MEMBER ~ Guonce Annvuruxor, ‘Esq. Rey. F. H. Bartye, M.A. *ArrrepD HENRY Baynus, Esq., . Rev. Jonn Brack’) * [F.S.S.- *Dr, Brecxtry, C.B., LL.B. Tuomas Bruty, Esq. WReG he Bevan, Esq. ‘Bs ‘Bosweut, Esq. Lorp H. V. CHouMonDELEY. ‘Grorce Duncan, Esq.’ Ray. J. Oswaip. Dikxns: D, D. » “Rey. SAmuEL Dyson, D.D. Rey. CHRISTOPHER C. Fenn, M.A. Mason Genera FIELD. ~ Rev. Dowaup Frasgr, D.D. G. H. Frean, Esq. *LockHart Gorpon, Esq. *Rev. Wititam Gray, M.A. Mason’ GuneraueJ. G. Harripay. *Masorn GENERAL. Sin WinntamM CO EEE. CS 6 Rev. Wiuitam Hit. » | *Rev. Eb. BE. Jenxins, M,A. Rey. Joun KI.ner.\ ° / *W. Locxuart, Esq., F.R.C:8. *Rey. JAMES Lona. A. McARTHUR, Hisq., M.P. 3 oF HE ‘GRNERAL oUNcIn IN LONDON. eens Ray, J. "Tuarn- Davinson, D. Dy Dr. C. Macyamana, F.0.U. . GENERAL Sir Grorce AE ncoean. yf *Donanp Matueson, Esq. [K.C.B. Hueu M. Maruuson, Esq. . James. Ky Marureson, Esq. ; - Henry Morarts, Esq., M.C,S. J. C. Parry, Esq. ! Dr. H. Sinchairn PATERSON. — ’ H.. E. Perrys, Esq., B.C.5, Wilt + GENERAL “PucKR, -*Masor Gunnrat R. Ranken. Principat J. H. Riae, D.D. Rev. J. Sruarr S. RoveRTson. S. R. Scort, Hsqi- » *Rev. JOHN Siku, M. A. Rey. H. E. Suawe. A. P. Srewart, Esq., M.D. T. W. Stoucuton, Esq. *Rev. R. Warpiaw THOMPSON. — *Cotonen J. G. Toucs, M.S.C. Bet, Torneuue: Beqe/ie) Epwarp B. UNpERHILE, fea *Rev. L. B. Waite, M.A. (LL.D Grores WiiiisMs, Esq. Henry Wricut, Esq. *Rev.. W. WRIGHT, B.A, - Those marked thus * are i Members As Committee. arn om EMBERS OF GENERAL COUNCHL IN EDINBURGH. James Baurour, Esq. | Rey Rosert Gorpon BaLrour. REV. JAMES Brac, D.D. . Bensamin Buuu, Esq., F.R.GS. — Rav. WiG. Buainie, D. DY E.R: Rey. Horatrus Bong: D. 'D. Rv. JoHn Carrns, D.D. Rey. Uenry Catprrwoop, Li.D. - Professor of Moral Philosophy, University. - Joun Cowan, Esq. Ricut, Rev,, Henry, Correrimn, D.D., Bishop, epsecpas Chureh Edinburgh. Rev. G. D, Cunien, M.A. ‘Larur.-Con. Davipson, H.E.1.C.8. Rry. E. C. Dawson, M.A. -¥Lanut.-Cou.. Dops, H.M. Indian Army. ¥. Brown’ Douaas, Esq., Advo- po) Cahen pe Wixuiam Duncan, Esq. Sir James FartsHaw, Barr. Rev. Ropert Fit, D.D.,LL.D:, Professor of. Divinity, Univer. sity. *Rev. Wintiam Guirties, General Secretary of Tract’ and Book © Society. Rev, "V. H. Gooup, D.D: : Rev. J. G.| Herpman, D.D., Con- vener of Foreign Mission Com- “mittee of the Established Chch. of Scotland. ‘ og Rey, JAMES donuaron: «Rey. Joun Ker, D:D. Joun M. M’ OaxDLisH, Eeq. Ropert A. Macrin, Esq. [F.R.S.E- » Bay. TM’ Lavcutan, LL.D. tars) x3 ie Sak cee one F. R.S Davip M’ Larnn, Esq. | Duncan M? Tekh, isq., Duns JouHN Macraren, Esq. Rev. J.C. Macrratn. Mas.-Grn. Macpnerson, EH. M. Tn- dian Army, — Curistian Minnar, Esq. W. Ware Mrunar, Esq., §.S.C. “Rev. J. Murray Mrrouetn, LEL:D. Rey. Sir Henry WELLWoop Mon- CRIEFF, Bart, DD... Fi TheVery Rev. ‘Dray Montcomery, *WinLiaM NAtRN, Hsq. - ED.D. Rev. GErorGE: Pau, MEAL cy ie *Joun Princun,M.D., H.M. Indian Army. Rev. Rogert Ray, D.D., Prin-° cipal of the New College. Wiiii1Am Rosson; Esq., 8.8.C. The Rey. Danii: F. SaNprony, -. Davip Scorr, Hsq., CeA.. (LL.D. . | > James Sime, Esq., F/RS.E. ! *RoBeRT Suson, Esq. 1B.C.S. “Grorek Suir, Hsq., L.D. *Mas.:-GEN. NEPEAN Sort, ee Indian Army. Rey. Tomas ‘Situ, DD. ~ Rey. THomas Tayuon, D.D. Rey. ANDREW THOMSON, D.D. JaMES W. Urquuart, Esq. Sir J. Don WaucHvoer, Bart. Rev, ALEXANDER, Wuytr, M.A.” ‘ Rev. James Wittiamson, M.A. Rav. J. H. Winson, M.A.. Rev. WitL1aAmM WILSON, D.D. *Masor W. Wir, H.M. Indian Army. *CoroneL A. G. Youne, HM. In- _ dian Army. : EDUCATION IN INDIA. A LETTER TO HIS EXCELLENCY THE MOST HONOURABLE, THE MARQUIS OF RIPON, K.G.,, G.M.S.I, VICHROY AND GOVERNOR-GENERAL OF INDIA, Se. Se. BY y o JOHN MURDOCH, LL.D., (Indian Agent of the Christian Vernacular Education Society for India.) MADRAS: Gah G8. PRES §,6¥HPe hy . 13 Sale wi 4) Rope ee : “ot ro 1e-f, 5A IWS aire es tA ; ayy te: 1 oe a ca AY 4 fr A: #8 Al dc aa ae CON TT HeNG ee Page INTRODUCTION 1 Progress oF GovERNMENT Epucation IN INDIA 3 Early Efforts, 3; Introduction of English, 4; Muhammadan Col- lege, 4; Popular Education, 8; Recent Progress, 9. a InFLUENCE oF GoveRNMENT EDUCATION ~~. ie) Defects why noticed, 9; Admissions, 10; AttEGEp Evi ek OF Ene.ish Epucation, 10; ’ Self- Conceit, 10; ” Rudeness, 12; Disloyalty, : 14; Scepticism, 26 ; University Text Books, 28; Immorality, 33; Pro- fessor M. Williams on Government Education in India, 36. Procrepines oF Lorp NorTHBROOK Reports of School-Book Committees, 39 ; Remitts of Shoals Book Committees, 39. IMPORTANCE OF ScHOOL-BOOKS ... AIMS OF GOVERNMENT EDUCATION SuBsEcts or Instruction, 42; Reading, Writing, ma Htaeimetiel 42 ; Literature, 42; Natural Science, 43; Agriculture, 48 ; Manufactures, 60; Technical ‘Bducation, 65 ; Social Reform, G7; Moral Instruction, 74s Religious Teaching in Government Schools, 76; Moral Duties, 89; Ethical University Instruction, 99; Promotion of Loyalty, 103 ; Singing, 110; Geography, History, &. 111 ; Illustrations, 111. Review oF GoveERNMENT ReapinG-Booxs English Series, 113 ; Vernacular School-Books, 117. PREPARATION oF A New SERIES OF READERS... . o Preliminary Survey, 122; Procedure at Home, 123; Vernacular Editions, 124. GRANT-IN-AID RULES e em Refusal of Grants, 126; ieaminaGon suena 128; Freedom in choice of Books, 129. TRANSFER OF Epucation to LocaL MANAGEMENT Middle Class Schools, 183; Primary Schools, 1383; Female Banc tion, 186; Agricultural and Technical Schools, 141. DesIRABLENEsS OF A Minister oF Pusiic Instruction. CoNCLUDING PROPOSALS ... Preparation of a New Series of Reade ers. 142 , Revision of Grant-in-aid Rules, 142. 40) . 112 eid ied Necleo . 182 . 141 142 J 80 on e138 on tlw ahetae um 41 pales AS nee nate Si rHAEVE. ti FO nophGa looded jus ‘AEDT: ree a Nooe Ck yt Aa vO f fis Os ¥ VIDS oe | ae re “ane surtavi: bul ened vibh nh ‘ aisha <8 th es iris sya “aL ya: ee ee wea rl inoide Wa pidiseg’ mi? ge: abe 4% > Pye eh “cereal iu (ths “ini AEA tit a RMA iv wipe WG _ te 2 ae avian «40a ei Say Teak ‘, oa A 7 | 2 cet” ie . see ‘ Nig alin. aa ; * e 4 - ae i LY by rit’ To His Excettency tHe Most Honovurasie Toe MARQUIS or RIPON, kK. a, aM. s. ©, Viceroy and Governor-General of India, Chancellor of the University of Calcutta, SC. FC. My Lorp, Tue Government of one-sixth of the earth’s population, differ- ing in race and creed, with many inflammable elements, is a task demanding the greatest care and wisdom. The difficulty is increased by the administration being largely in the hands of foreigners, its head, generally a stranger to the country, holding office for only five short years. The state of the people forbids Government standing still. On the other hand, it is possible, with the very best intentions, to make changes the evils resulting from which would far counterbalance the good. In some cases, the Viceroy has not to take the initiative, but to watch over measures introduced by his predecessors. It is a misfortune that the originator of a scheme in India is generally unable to guide its working, upon which so much depends. Like Solomon, he must “ leave it unto the man that shall be after him.” Powerful vested interests and party claims have also to be taken into account. Under such circumstances it is prudent to have important questions viewed from different stand-points before coming to a decision. The subject on which I venture to address your Lordship is one of the most weighty that can come before you—the education of the country. As Lord Northbrook justly remarked, in a University address, “It would be bold indeed in me to venture to give any authoritative opinion upon the effects of the spread of education in India. I doubt whether any of those here pre- sent, however earnest they may be in the cause, could venture to prophesy what the effects of the spread of education in India may eventually be.” Lord Lytton spoke of the change now going on in India as “the greatest and most momentous revolution—at once social, moral, religious and political—which perhaps, the world has ever witnessed.” Education is rapidly spreading. According to the trite say- ing, “‘ Knowledge is power.” Whether it will prove a blessing or a curse depends upon the way in which itis employed. The stream resembles its source. The effects of education turn 2 INTRODUCTION. largely upon its character. ‘‘If we go seriously wrong,” says Dr. Murray Mitchell, ‘‘in the educational system we set up, the error may soon be irretrievable, and the consequences fatal.” When a witness gives evidence before a commission, the first inquiry is generally about his means of acquaintance with the subject. The writer may, therefore, be permitted to state that he has been connected with education in the Hast for nearly forty years. For about twenty years in succession he has made the circuit of the three Presidencies of India; he has visited every country in Europe noted for the excellence of its schools, as well as twice crossed the Atlantic. He may also venture to add that some previous remarks on the same subject, sub- mitted to Lord Northbrook, were favourably received, and, it is believed, had some influence. An endeavour will be made to take all the circumstances into consideration. Schemes will not be brought forward which, however good in themselves, are impracticable on account of the expense. Nor, again, will changes be proposed inconsistent with the avowed principles of Government education. Every important step will be supported by past practice or by the approval of some of the most distinguished educationists or officers of Government. The writer will sometimes appear to have needlessly dwelt on what are platitudes, to have wasted labour in ‘slaying the slain.” But there is still a consider- able amount of ignorance in India about what are considered educational truisms in Europe. Some influential men still represent what may be termed the “middle ages” of Oxford. If there is any recognised principle among enlightened educa- tionists at home it is, that teachers ought to be trained. Yet Dr. George Smith, himself an experienced educationist, said, “In a backward country like India the Normal School is the root of all successful education....It is sad to be under the necessity of writing such platitudes year after year; but it is necessary.’’* The writer’s course in India is nearly run. The shadows of life begin to darken. Before he leaves the country where his best years have been spent, he would seek to make another effort both for its poor toiling millions and for their natural leaders. He takes encouragement to himself from the remark of a former Vice-chancellor of the Calcutta University : “Men abstain from doing good or attacking evil when the opportunity is plain before them, for lack of faith in their individual power ; but it is no new lesson which science teaches when it says that no energy, however feeble, is ever lost, and that no exertion is without some avail.” * Friend of India, PROGRESS OF GOVERNMENT EDUCATION IN INDIA. Before entering into details, it may be well to give a very brief sketch of what has been hitherto done. It will show the great evils resulting from ill-advised schemes, the necessity of watchful supervision, and the practicability of improvement. Early Ufforts—The Calcutta Madrissa, or Muhammadan Col- lege, established in 1781 by Warren Hastings, seems to have been the first educational institution founded by the British Government in India. It was followed in 1792 by the Sanskrit College of Benares. The discipline of the College was to be *‘conformable in all respects to the Dharma Shastra in the chapter on education.”? The scholars were to be examined four times a year in the presence of the Resident, ‘in all such parts of knowledge as are not held too sacred to be discussed in the presence of any but Brahmins.’”* The Poona College was founded in 1821. The Peshwa had annually distributed a large sum of money among the Brabmins noted for their learning. Mr. Chaplin, Commissioner of the Dekkan, proposed, as aless objectionable method of spending the funds while the original object was in some measure kept in view, that part of the grant should be devoted to the support of a College. On the renewal of the East India Company’s Charter in 1813, the following clause was inserted : “A sum of not less than a lakh of Rupees (£10,000) in each year shall be set apart and applied to the revival and improvement of literature and the encouragement of the learned natives of India, and for the in- troduction and promotion of a knowledge of the sciences among the inhabitants of the British territories in India.” No steps, however, were taken by the Indian Government for ten years to carry out this measure, and the money was left to accumulate. In July 1823, the Governor-General in Council resolved, that, _ “There should be constituted a General Committee of Public Instruc- tion, for the purpose of ascertaining the state of public education, and of the public institutions designed for its promotion, and of considering, and from time to time submitting to Government, the suggestion of such measures as it may appear expedient to adopt with a view to the better instruction of the people, to the introduction among them of useful know- ledge, and to the improvement of their moral character.” oS PDE EN Bae a ee ee * Kerr’s Review of Public Instruction in the Bengal Presidency, p. 185. 4 PROGRESS OF GOVERNMENT EDUCATION IN INDIA. In 1826, Sir Thomas Munro established a similar Board of Public Instruction for the Madras Presidency. The/ Bombay Board of Education was constituted in 1840. Until 1835, the Bengal Committee of Public Instruction was mainly in the hands of orientalists, the study of Sanskrit and Arabic receiving special attention. ‘The medium of instruc- tion,” says Macaulay, “was oriental, the whole scope of the instruction was oriental, designed to conciliate old prejudices, and to propagate old ideas.” Introduction of English—Intelligent Hindus felt the need of an education better adapted to the wants of the nineteenth century. In 1816 the Hindu College was established in Calcutta, largely through the efforts of David Hare, a watchmaker. The studies included the works of Locke, Adam Smith, Shakespere, Milton, and other writers. Dr. Dufi’s Institution in Calcutta, commenced in 1830, gave a great impulse tothe study of English. His views were held by the late Lord Macaulay and Sir Charles Trevelyan. Macaulay, in a scathing minute, exposed the absurdity of teach- ing at the public expense, ‘‘ Medical doctrines that would disgrace an English farrier,—Astronomy, which would move laughter in girls at an English boarding school,—History, abounding with kings thirty feet high, and reigns thirty thousand years long,—and Geography, made up of seas of treacle and seas of butter.”’ Soon afterwards, Lord William Bentinck issued the following order: “His Lordship in Council is of opinion that the great object of the British Government ought to be the promotion of European literature and science amongst the Natives of India, and that all the funds appro- priated for the purposes of education would be best employed on English education alone.” Macaulay subsequently explained that the General Com- mittee, in “advocating English as the best medium of instruction, _ had in view those classes only of the community who had means and leisure for obtaining a thorough education.” ‘* When the object is merely an elementary education, it may be most easily imparted to the natives in their own language.” The Muhammadan College—The frightful abuses connected with this for about a century will be detailed at some length for an important purpose which will be explained. Its original design was to supply Muhammadan law officers. It was consigned to the uncontrolled management of Muham- madan Professors, who ‘“ professed to teach Theology and Law according to the Koran, the Commentators, and the Traditionists, and Science according to the Greco-Arabic system of Bagdad and Bokhara.” THE MUHAMMADAN COLLEGE. 5 For nearly forty years the studies of the College were nomi- nal, and its ample resources were dissipated among the superior and subordinate drones of the establishment. In 1820 an English visitor was appointed, but in 1850 it was reported to Government that he was powerless to prevent ficti- tious Muster Rolls of Students and nominal Professors; besides that there had been no advance since the time of Warren Hast- ings either in the system of instruction pursued or in the amount of study accomplished. This led to the appointment of a well-qualified European Principal, Dr. Sprenger, who turned his attention to the im- provement of the Institution, remarking that the course of study | which was actually in operation led to the encouragement of purely dialectical pursuits, and tended to keep up antiquated prejudices and to give systematic sanction to superstitions con- demned even by Islam. The system, Dr. Sprenger added, is in fact precisely the same as the one which was in vogue in Europe during the darkest ages, and it produces the same results. The sophistries of dialectics learned in a sacred lan- guage puff up the Professors with conceit, render them hostile to every thing practical or founded on experience, and ex- tinguish in them the sense of art and beauty, and blunt the sentiment of equity and morality. The learned and quasi learned Muhammadans who ruled over the Institution, besides teaching Arabic in their own peculiarly dawdling, irrational and inefficient manner, varied the scholastic pursuits of the students by periodical assemblages of the neigh- bourhood for public prayer and exhortation, as well as by the frequent funerals of deceased Muhammadans, whose relations were encouraged to bring their bodies to the College at all times of the day for the performance of the prescribed rites and ceremonies, for which of course the work of teaching was always suspended. The above account is abridged from a Minute* by the Lieuten- ant-Governor of Bengal, printed in the Bengal Public In- struction Report for 1857-58. Dr. Hunter’s Indian Musalmans contains statements still more recent and still more astonishing :— ** Every year under our instruction makes them more confident in their own narrow system of learning, more vicious as to their morals, less fit for any active career in life, and more disloyal to our Government. They hate the sight of an Englishman. When the scandal had grown so public as to render imperative a resident English Professor in the College, he had to be smuggled into it by night. During more than ninety years the Chapters on Holy War against the Infidel have been the favourite #* The whole Minute and Dr. Hunter’s book deserve careful attention. 6 PROGRESS OF GOVERNMENT EDUCATION IN INDIA. studies of the place; and up to 1868 or 1869,I forget the exact date, ex- amination questions were regularly given in this Doctrine of Rebellion.” “Unhappily an even sadder tale remains to be told. I do not speak of the last two years during which the Special Commission has been sit- ting. But there is evidence on record to show, that, within a quite re- cent period, the students brought their courtesans into the College. About twenty-six of them have rooms; and the quarters thus granted by the Government were converted into dens of profligacy. Not content with harbouring what Carlyle calls the unmentionable women, they sunk into those more horrible crimes against nature which Christianity has extirpated from Europe, but which lurk in every great city of India. * Some of the more diligent supplement the meagre College Curriculum by reading ‘religion’ in private Musalman schools outside. Such external studies consist chiefly of the Muhammadan Traditions (Hadis) and law-books of the fanatical medieval stamp,—a sort of learning which fills the youthful brain with windy self-importance, and gives rise to bitter schism on the most trivial points within the College walls. Not long ago, as the English Resident Professor was going his evening rounds, he heard a tumult in the students’ rooms. ‘ Your religion is all wrong,’ (tumharaé iman t’hik ne) and similar phrases resounded through the corridors, and fierce were the denunciations on all sides. He hurried to the scene of the - uproar, and found that one of the students had discovered in a law-book that during prayer the heels should be joined, else the petition has no effect in heaven or on earth. Those who had said their prayers with unclosed heels denounced the discoverer of the new mode as a pernicious heretic; while he anda little band of followers consigned all who prayed in the old fashion to the eternal torments of hell.” “ At the end of seven years the students know certain books by heart, text and interpretation; but if they get a simple manuscript beyond their narrow Curriculum, they are in a moment beyond their depth. Sucha teaching, it may well be supposed, produces an intolerant contempt for anything which they have not learned. The very nothingness of their acquirements makes them the more conceited. ‘They know as an absolute truth that the Arabic grammar, law, rhetoric, and logic, comprise all that is worth knowing upon earth. They have learned that the most extensive kingdoms in the world are, first Arabia, then England, France, and Russia, and the largest town, next to Mecca, Medina, and Cairo, is London. Aw reste, the English are Infidels, and will find themselves in a very hot place in the next world.” pp. 204—207. 2nd Hd. 1872. Dr. Hunter adds: ‘‘I have dwelt on these painful details, because I believe it most important, now that the Government has awakened to the necessity of really educating the Musal- mans, that it should avoid a system which has brought failure upon its one great previous attempt. Our Calcutta Muhamma- dan College has been practically left in the hands of the Muham- madans themselves, and it is under their management that it has proved such a scandal and disgrace.” The present writer offers a similar apology for reproducing them. It is reported that a bill is shortly to be introduced into the Viceregal Council, raising the Punjab University College to the rank of a University. A Memorial lately presented by the Indian Association, Lahore, contains the following :— THE MUHAMMADAN COLLEGE. 7 “ Statute III. 3a. provides that the study of English shall form one of the most prominent features of the teaching in all the Schools and Colleges. connected with the Institution, &. Now the ‘study of Eng- lish,’ instead of forming one of the most prominent features of the teaching of the Oriental College, ts not taught m tt at all. Again, Statute - IIL. 8rd provides—‘ Proficiency in Arabic or Sanscrit or such other oriental language as may be prescribed by the governing body, combined with a thorough acquaintance with English, shall be a necessary condition for obtaining the highest honors of the Institution.’ The Senate has held (vide Punjab University College Calendar for 1878-79, para. 55) that English shall not be a compulsory subject for the High Proficiency in Arts’ Examination, which is said to be equivalent to the B. A. Examina- tion of the Calcutta University. The same Statute further says, ‘ Provision shall be made for duly recognizing and honouring proficiency in literature and science in the case of those unacquainted with English, provided such attainments are combined with a fair acquaintance with the more important subjects of European education, such as history, geography, &c. so far as such acquaintance is obtainable through the medium of the Vernacular.’ This rule has been set at nought in all examinations on the Oriental side held by the Punjab University College. No know- ledge of important subjects of Huropean education is required in any of the following examinations ;—Maulavi, Maulavi Alim, Maulayvi Fazil, in Arabic; Munshi, Munshi Alim, Munshi Fazil, in Persian; Pragya, Visharad and Shastri, in Sanscrit.”’ How far the above representations are correct the writer does not know, but the examinations for the title of Maulavi, &c., recall to memory the Muhammadan College of Calcutta. A Maulavi may be described as a Muhammadan ecclesiastical law- yer. Muhammadan law is based on the Quran, the Traditions, &c. It involves the study of text-books like those of Bagdad and Bokhara, whose effects have already been described. The Shastris are much of the same stamp as the Maulavis. Pro- fessor Monier Williams admits “the utter narrowmindedness of Indian Pandits. They have believed the whole circle of human knowledge to be contained in Sanskrit writings. To this very day the most bigoted are fully persuaded that to learn any- thing beyond the Sastras is quite useless.’’* It may be objected that only the valuable branches of oriental study are taught by the Punjab University College. The very same avowal was made at Poona. The College was for “the encouragement and improvement of the useful part of Hindu learning.’ After several years’ trial, the Bombay Government declared that the Institution had “fulfilled no purpose but that of perpetuating prejudices and false systems of opinions, and that unless it could be reformed, it had better be abolished.’’+ Macaulay says in his Minute :— * Modern India, p. 287. + Oriental Christian Spectator, Vol. 1V. p. 302. 8 PROGRESS OF GOVERNMENT EDUCATION IN INDIA. “‘ We do not even stand neuter in the contest between truth and falsehood. We are not content to leave the natives to the influence of their hereditary prejudices. To the natural difficulties which obstruct the progress of sound science in the East we add difficulties of our own making. “What we spend on the Arabic and Sanskrit Colleges is not merely a dead loss to the cause of truth; it is the bounty-money paid to raise up champions of error. It goes to forma nest, not merely of helpless place- hunters, but of bigots prompted alike by passion and by interest to raise a cry against every useful scheme of education.” The writer acknowledges that he is entirely ignorant of the provisions of the bill to be introduced into Council for the esta- blishment of the Punjab University. There may be good and sufficient reasons for such a course. It may be that his fears are groundless, that the contemplated regulations are such as to prevent abuses. | Vernacular literature deserves every encouragement; but, as a rule, any of real value at present must come from men well acquainted with English. Maulavis and Pandits, puffed up with vain conceit from their knowledge of Arabic and Sanskrit, have no ideas worth communicating. English opens out to them a new world, and does more than any thing else to show them that they have been, to use their own figure, like tortoises in a well. All that is urged is, that past experience shows the need of the utmost caution. It is desirable that the bill should be fully discussed out of Council, as well as within Council, before it is passed. Opinions should be obtained from other parts of India, and not confined to the Punjab. They should also represent dif- ferent stand-points. There are already symptoms of antagonism between Muham- madans and Hindus, and care should be taken not, even uninten- tionally, to foster this spirit. The course pursued in the past has been condemned by some of the most intelligent friends of progress in the Punjab. Its approval by Muhammadans and Hindus should be rated at its proper value. The foregoing quotations and remarks are not dictated by any unfriendly feeling towards our Muhammadan fellow-sub- jects. There are none more requiring our warmest sympa- thies and efforts. But their welfare will best be promoted, not by strengthening their ignorant prejudices, but by giving them an education which will render them more enlightened, and better fitted to take the position in life they wish to occupy. Popular Education—Sir Thomas Munro seems to have been the first to establish schools of a lower grade, in addition to those for secondary instruction. The Board of Directors sanctioned an annual grant of £5,000 towards their support. During the administration of Lord Hardinge, about a hundred vernacular INFLUENCE OF GOVERNMENT EDUCATION. 9 schools were opened in Bengal. Though both the preceding attempts ended in failure, in 1850 Mr. Thomason, Lieutenant- Governor of the North-West Provinces, commenced a lower class system of education which was attended with marked success. | Recent Progress.—But Sir Charles Wood’s celebrated Despatch of 1854 may be called the Magna Charta of Government educa- tion in India. It was drafted by the present Karl of Northbrook, and expresses the most enlightened and comprehensive views. Directors of Public Instruction were appointed, three Univer- sities were established, and even during “troublous times” the Government of India sought to carry out the provisions of the Despatch. | In 1860 the number of pupils in schools and colleges aided or maintained by Government in British India was 306,506; in 1870, it had increased to 1,096,028; and in 1880, to 1,820,798, including 82,274 girls. By the census of 1881, the population of British India was about 190 millions. Only one per cent is therefore yet under instruction, showing how much still remains to be done. But, there has been progress, and if the resources of the country are not worse than wasted on “ scientific frontiers,” the future advance will be still more rapid. INFLUENCE OF GOVERNMENT EDUCATION. Satisfaction at the spread of education must depend upon its effects. Past experience has shown what shameful abuses may exist for nearly a century in the Capital of British India, the centre of European civilization, under the eye of the Su- preme Government. With regard to Vernacular Education, there is a general agree- ment that it has been, on the whole, beneficial. At the same time it is susceptible of considerable improvement, especially in some parts of the country. The influence of English Education has been much more of _ a mixed character. One main object of Government has undoubtedly been gained. A class of public servants has been raised up of greater in- telligence, truthfulness and probity than their predecessors. On the other hand, it is alleged that the spread of English education has been followed by some serious evils. Defects why noticed.—It may seem ungenerous and unfair briefly to acknowledge excellencies, and to dwell at great length upon 10 INFLUENCE OF GOVERNMENT EDUCATION- alleged defects. But the object in view has to be taken into account. Let all excellencies remain. If any improvements are practicable, it is necessary to show where they are required, and the means by which they can be secured. The first point to be ascertained is, Do the alleged defects exist? Evidence with regard to this has therefore to be ad- duced. Hence the numerous quotations from persons entitled to be heard. Admissions.—These should be borne in mind :— 1. The evils complained of are, to a greater or less degree, inevitable in the present transition state of India. 2. The Rev. James Johnston, in the Preface to ‘ Our Educa- tional Policy in India,” says, * When I call attention to the fact, that education in Government Colleges leads to irreligion, discontent, and disloyalty, let it be distinctly understood that I neither lay the entire blame on Government Colleges for the effects produced, nor do I except other Colleges from producing, in many cases, like results.” p. xv. 3. There are some noble men in the Government Educational Department who are trying their utmost to diminish the evils which will be noticed. Still, the cause and cure rest largely with Government. Government is now the main educational factor. Directors of Public Instruction, Government Inspectors, Government Regu- lations and Government School Books, are more and more mould- ing the entire education of the country. Lastly, while giving the opinions of high authorities, the writer does not hold himself responsible for all their statements. That the evils exist, he is absolutely certain. As to their extent, there may be some question. All that the writer contends for is, that they deserve careful consideration, and that every means should be taken to counteract them, whatever be their origin. ALLEGED EVIL EFFECTS OF ENGLISH EDUCATION. SELF-CONCEIT AND RUDENESS. Self-Conceit.—Young people every-where are apt to have a good opinion of themselves. An English poet says, “When young, indeed, In full content, we sometimes nobly rest, Unanxious for ourselves, and only wish, As duteous sons, our fathers were more wise.” SELF-CONCEIT. Il Educated young men in India are under peculiar temptations to this failing. Some of them are fond of dwelling upon the fact that the Hindus were civilised when the English were painted savages. More than this is sometimes claimed. A sensible Bengali gentleman said in Calcutta: “It was quite sickening to hear the remark made at almost every public meeting that the ancient civilization of India was far superior to that which Hurope ever had.” People in England are apt to fall into a similar error with regard to their own country. The Elizabethan age is one of the most glorious in the annals of Britain. It reckons among its ornaments statesmen like Cecil and Raleigh, poets like Spenser and Shakespere. If, however, we consider the state of the nation generally, a very different picture is presented. Much more was this the case in India. The “‘nine gems’ that adorned the court of Vik- ramaditiya were only like a few bright stars in the dark night. Macaulay’s words apply to India with double force: ‘‘ We see the multitudes sunk in brutal ignorance, and the studious few engaged in acquiring what did not deserve the name of know- ledge.”’ Superiority of intellect over their present rulers and teachers is sometimes asserted. The Indian Banner, among other remarks, had the following :— “We men of the Hast can look at the sun, whilst those of the West wink and blink and wear coloured spectacles that falsify their vision; but this magnificent portion .of the terrestrial globe, this flowery nation, will yet find an expansion of which England perhaps is little aware in her little narrow corner of the earth—the birth-place of bigotry and science.” The Bombay Saturday Review thus criticised the above :— *“We have been found fault with by a contemporary for our censures of native shortcomings. Perhaps we have sometimes flogged with un- fashionable severity, but it_ must be admitted, in extenuation, that the pupil is a very provoking one. / It is not that he is intolerably dull or obstinate,\ though he is sometimes. both the one and the other, but that he is so exceedingly well satisfied with himself, and so thoroughly persuaded of his own innate superiority to his teachers. — “The ‘educated’ natives are evidently of opinion that, by virtue of a Supposed pre-eminence of India, they are entitled to regard themselves as the favoured race, the lords of intellect to whom Providence has in- trusted the regeneration of mankind. Their English instructors belong, they think, to a dull, good-natured, plodding nation, whose mission on earth has been to preserve the glorious traditions of Indian knowledge | and to restore them at last to their true inheritors, whose minds have | meanwhile been lying fallow for a few centuries, They constantly address us with a compassionate and irresistibly ludicrous air, that seems to say, * Poor fellows, you have done your work as well as you could; you have fulfilled your part in life by teaching us what you know. Now, be so good 12 ALLEGED EVIL EFFECTS OF ENGLISH EDUCATION. as to stand out of the way, and you will see what intellect really can do; for the play of the Indian genius is about to commence.’ One is reminded of Mr. Snodgrass, when that hero rolls up his sleeves, and announces to the awed bystanders that he is going to begin.... “Beware of your besetting faults of dreaminess, inordinate conceit, and love of empty talking. Quit yourselves as men; be strong. Firmly follow in practice what you acknowledge to be right. Tell truth and shame the devil. And tell truth to your own souls; do not palter with your consciences, or remain contented with a phantasmagoria of incoherent opinions, the odds and ends of desultory reading, but ground yourselves in principles such as may stand the several tests of authority, that is, of great teachers, and of actual experience in life. If you would belong to a nation, you must first make yourselves men. If you would show your- selves really enlightened, speak with becoming reverence, not with flippant ingratitude, of the country which has enabled you for the first time to understand the ideas of national life, liberty, law, ‘ bigotry,’ and progress, and which offers to substitute the civilization of the West for your own fossilized institutions. You have enormous advantages over others. Yours has been the royal road to learning. England has raised you at once into the position which we have inherited as heirs of centuries of protracted struggle. Is it too much, then, to ask that you should be modest, patient, resolute, striving earnestly to render yourselves worthy pupils of the nation inhabiting that ‘ narrow corner of the earth,’ that ‘ precious gem set in the silver sea,’ which has filled the whole world with the splendour of its glory, and stamped for itself an imperishable name on the heart of every lover of freedom and progress P” ; Rudeness.—This is another charge brought against ‘‘ Young India.”? He resents it, considering that he only shows proper self-respect, while he accuses “‘Old India” of servility, and Englishmen of a love of toadyism. A few quotations may be made complaining of the evil. The Punjab Public Instruction Report contains the following remarks by the Lieutenant-Governor :— | ‘‘ Nor has the system which produces few scholars been more successful in producing gentlemen. The Lieutenant-Governor desires that the Department take especial care that the good manners natural to Oriental youth are not lost at school. This matter has hitherto been neglected. If the result of sending boys of good family to school is, as is now often the case, that they return pert, conceited and studiously rude and familiar, it is no wonder that parents desire to educate their children at home. English education is not a desirable thing if it only signifies sufficient acquaintance with the English language to write and speak ungram- matically, sufficient acquaintance with English literature to be shallow, and with English history to be insolent. English education is to be penetrated with the spirit of the great English authors; to imbibe some portion of their strength, and beauty, and nobility, and gentleness, and wisdom, to mould the life and character upon the models they have furnished. This is the standard of education to which the Department must endeavour to rise.” Report, 1871-72, pp. 4, 5. Sir William Grey, Lieutenant-Governor of Bengal, was so convinced of the extent of the evil, that one of his last acts was to issue a Minute on the subject. He says, RUDENESS. — 13 “Tt is a common remark that the educated young men of the present day betray a want of gentleman-like bearing in their social intercourse _ with their superiors and elders, whether European or Native, and that the evil is a growing one, and seems coincident with the general spread of education throughout the country.” Such complaints are not confined to Huropeans. The Indian Mirror says :— * Our young men do not know or care to know how to respect their supe- riors. This may appear strange, for the Natives of India are known to be fastidiously polite. (inglish education has made them self-sufficient, and \ infused into their minds a kind of false independence which knows of no distinction between high or low, old or young.” | The present Maharaja of Travancore, in a Lecture delivered at Trevandrum whilst First Prince, remarked :— **T am here led to observe that our contact with European civilization has not resulted in unqualified success so far as our manners are con- cerned. Perhaps you know the story current among us of the crow that | attempted to study the swan’s gait, but lost its own, and did not secure that of its model. Iam afraid that the comportment of not afew of our educated youths would strongly suggest comparison with this crow.” Some allowance ought to be made for circumstances. Men are prone to rush from one extreme to the other. Nor do the above remarks, by any means, apply to all educated men. Many of them exhibit the gentlemanly bearing which is so becoming; guarding on the one hand against obsequiousness, and, on the other, against the insolence which is mistaken for the display of a proper spirit. Whatever may be the extent of the evil or its source, all thoughtful men will be agreed that in the present transition state of India it is of great importance to inculcate respect for authority. ‘‘ Reverence,” says Smiles, “is alike indis- pensable to the happiness of individuals, of families, and of nations. Without it there can be no trust, no faith, no confi- dence, either in man or God—neither social peace nor social progress.” The advice given in Madras by the Hon. H. 8. Cunningham, deserves to be impressed upon students :— _“ Beware, above all things, of an ignorant, irreverential frame of mind; distrust the learning which engenders it; a little knowledge is oftentimes especially dangerous in this, that, instead of prostrating the mind with a sense of the vastness of science and the smallness of human wit, it puffs it up with a childish conceit at its own lilliputian acquirements....Self- assertion and vanity, insolence towards the past, recklessness as to the future, satisfaction with ourselves, indifference to the feelings of others, are the certain characteristics of superficial, worthless education, and of an ill-trained moral character.” 14 ALLEGED EVIL EFFECTS OF ENGLISH EDUCATION. DISLOYALTY. ‘ This is an accusation regarding which educated Hindus are rightly very sensitive. As Sir Richard Temple remarks, ‘‘ Nothing wounds and irritates them more than imputations of disloyalty; and nothing gratifies them more than a frank and cordial acknowledgment of their loyalty.” Some mistakes have been made in distinguishing what dis- loyalty is :— “The state of the country and of the people often invites or demands criticism on the part of the Natives. It is every way desirable that their sentiments and opinions should be unreservedly made known to the ruling classes, and.such outspoken frankness should never be mistaKen for disloy- alty or disaffection.’’* An inquiry into Native loyalty is a very delicate one, and apt to cause ill feeling. It would be much more pleasant to educa- ted Indians for the writer to suppress all disagreeable evidence, and give only favourable testimony. This, however, is not for their own real good in the end. If discontent. exist, itis highly important that it should be known. What are its causes? It may partly arise from misapprehensions which may be explained ; there may be just grievances which ought to be remedied. ‘The worst thing possible for us is to live in a “ fool’s paradise,” *‘ saying peace” if there is “no peace.” There is danger of this. “The mutiny afforded many illustrations of the inability of foreigners to feel the pulse of the people amongst whom they were living in the intimate relations of master and servant or officer and private.’’+ It should be remembered that the remarks under this head are solely with a view to ulterior measures to promote the happiness and prosperity of the people. In his last Minute, Lord Dalhousie wrote the following memo- rable words, the truth of which was so lamentably shown during the administration of his immediate successor :— “No prudent man, who has any knowledge of Eastern affairs, would ever venture to predict the maintenance of continued peace within our Eastern possessions. Experience, frequent, hard, and recent experience, has taught us, that wars from without, and rebellion from within, may at any time be raised against us, in quarters where they were the least to be expected, and by the most feeble and unlikely instruments. No man therefore can ever prudently hold forth assurance of continued peace in India.” * India in 1880, p. 136. This work will be frequently quoted, because it contains more recent, varied, and reliable information about India than any single volume ever published. The author, from the time he was Private Secretary to Sir John Lawrence in the Punjab, has generally taken a bright view of things, though he also gives the dark side. Where he admits defects, it may be taken for granted that they certainly exist. ’ t Quarterly Review. July, 1881, p. 65. DISLOYALTY. 15 Lord Canning, in his parting address to the European Deputa- tion at Calcutta, observed :— “England has before her one of the most difficult problems that State policy can be called to solve; the drawing together with harmony and with- out injustice to either side, two great races radically different in every thing that forms the character of man, but which by the course of events are being gradually brought face to face.” The patriotism of the ancient Greeks and Romans is thus des- cribed by Lecky :— ; * Outside the circle of their own nation all men were regarded with contempt and indifference, if not with absolute hostility. Conquest was the one recognised form of national progress, and the interests of nations were, therefore, regarded as directly opposed. The intensity with which a man loved his country was a measure of the hatred which he bore to those who were without it.” Much of this spirit still survives in Europe. Smiles says, « A great deal of what passes by the name of patriotism in these days consists of the merest bigotry and narrow-mindedness ; ex- hibiting itself in national prejudice, national conceit, and national hatred.” Things may be expected to be still worse in the Hast. From no great nation in the world are we divided by loftier barriers than from the Hindus. The inhabitants of the “ Central Flowery Land” give us the complimentary epithets of ‘“ outside barbarians” and “foreign devils; but they will invite us to their tables. In the sight of genuine Hindus, we are unclean out- castes, whose very shadow is pollution. Even the most friendly say to us like Shylock to Bassanio: ‘I will buy with you, sell with you, talk with you, walk with you, and so following ; but I will not eat with you, drink with you, nor pray with you.” Professor Monier Williams says :— “T have met with bigoted Pandits whose contempt for us ‘and our boasted civilization, notwithstanding they travel by our rilways, use our telegraphs, and live in security under our rule, and glbeit they take pains to conceal their real estimate of our character, is, I am convinced quite as great as the contempt of their forefathers for any non-Aryan savages, whether styled Dasyus or Nishadas. *T may mention, in illustration, that I often wondered, when in India, why certain great Pandits preferred calling on me very early in the morning, till I found out accidentally that, by coming before bathing, they were able afterwards to purify themselves by religious ablutions from the contamination incurred by shaking hands and talking with me. “Nor have the Muhammadans, as a rule, any greater respect for us, for our social institutions, or for our religion. When they are less scorn- ful than usual they confine themselves to calling us Kdjirs, unbelievers. But in India this epithet scarcely represents the amount of contempt with which we are commonly regarded by bigoted Muslims. Many of 16 ALLEGED E£VIL EFFECTS OF ENGLISH EDUCATION. them have been seen to spit on the ground on leaving the houses of eminent civilians, after interviews in which the most courteous expressions had been interchanged.’’* The natural prejudice against us as foreign conquerors, 1s increased by some unfortunate defects in ourselves. Lord Canning, at the opening of the Hast Indian Railway to Rajmahal, said :— “Gentlemen, it is of no use to deny or conceal it, for it is known to all the world, we Englishmen, with all our great national characteristics, are not, as a people, conciliatory or attractive. God forbid that any of us should feel ashamed of his national character, or wish it to be other than it is. But none among us will deny that the very virtues of that character are not seldom exaggerated into faults.” It is not to be expected that our rule should be really popular. As a very experienced friend remarked, where the people, “do not positively hate us, they don’t want us.’”? Kaye says in his life of Mountstuart Elphinstone :— “In later days we have been wont to assume in such cases not only the utter absence of all national feeling, but a craving after British rule which never has existed and never will exist in the popular mind, however wise and beneficial our Government may be. Mr. Elphinstone had no dream of this kind.”’+ Professor Monier Williams expresses the following opinion :— “The most intelligent are quite ready to admit that they enjoy greater benefits under our rule than they would under any other; and the wiser, who know that universal disorder would follow its cessation, even pray for its continuance; but the mass of unthinking people would rather be badly governed by their own chiefs than well governed by us. In the Native States they will acquiesce in exactions which in our territories would be regarded as intolerable.” t Elsewhere he says, “T have found all intelligent Natives generally satisfied with our rule. It is useless, however, to conceal from ourselves the existence of much discontent, chiefly among the men we have educated above their stations.” p. 361. Evidence will be adduced presenting different views of the case. It will be shown, that if some men evince a hostile and disloyal spirit, the offenders have very sensible advice given to them by their own countrymen. A Bengali “ patriot”? thus addresses his countrymen :— * Modern India, p. 226. + Lives of Indian Officers, Vol. I. p. 277. } Modern India, p- 178. RUDENESS. 17 ‘Mark the pampered upstart intruding foreigner, abusing, insulting, and murdering the helpless without fear of punishment.’’* A writer in the Englishman makes the following quotation from The Tempest as representing in some measure the state of feeling’ :— “You taught me language; and my profit on’t Is, I know how to curse: the red plague rid you, For learning me your language !” A gentleman, who lived for many years near one of the prin- cipal up-country Government Colleges, says of the young men educated at it: “They despise and hate their ‘Hnglish conquerors, foreign rulers, proud tyrants’ for such are the terms they use. ‘Could Greece’ they say, ‘resist a Xerxes ? What could India not do?’ They demonstrate clearly that the Indians could in one night destroy all the English throughout the length and breadth of the country.” An educated Hindustani, who had visited America, said to the writer, ‘“‘We are so many and you are so few, that if each of us took a pinch of dust we could smother you.” Mr. M. Gubbins shows this to be the natural effect of the Government system of education :— “We place in a boy’s hands the histories of Greece and Rome, and hold up to his admiration the examples of those ancient patriots who have freed their country from domestic tyranny or a foreign yoke. The knowledge which we impart to him destroys the reverence which he would naturally feel for his own religion and its precepts. In its stead, we implant no other of a holier and purer kind. Can we wonder, then, at the harvest which we too frequently reap—disloyalty untempered by gratitude; a spurious and selfish patriotism, unchecked by religion; and an overweening conceit of literary attainment, supported by no corresponding dignity of character.” Oudh, p. 84. It will be seen hereafter that lessons are drawn from Ireland as well as from Leonidas and his band.t+ A city in the Dekkan has been characterised as ‘‘ a hot-bed of sedition.” On the other hand, thoughtful, sensible men appreciate the advantages of English rule. The Hon. V. Ramiengar, now Dewan of Travancore, at a public meeting in Madras, made the following remarks :— “We live under the mildest, the most enlightened, and the most power- ful of modern Governments; we enjoy in a high degree the rights of personal security and personal liberty, and the right of private property ; the dwelling of the humblest and meanest subject may be said to be a * On the Religious Prospects of India, p. 48. + The limping logic in this case did not strike the young patriots. 3 18 ALLEGED EVIL EFFECTS OF ENGLISH EDUCATION. now as much his castle as that of the proud Englishman is his, in his native land; no man is any longer, by reason of his wealth or of his rank, so high as to be above the reach of the law, and none, on the other hand, is so poor and insignificant as to be beyond its protection. In less than a short century, anarchy and confusion have been replaced by order and good government, as if by the wand of a magician, and the country has started on a career of intellectual, moral, and material advancement, of which nobody can foresee the end. Whatever may be the shortcomings of Government, (and perfection is not vouchsafed to human institutions and human efforts) in the unselfish and sincere desire which animates them to promote the welfare of the millions com- mitted to their care, in the high view they take. of their obligations and responsibilities as Rulers, in the desire they show at all times to study the feelings and sentiments of the people and carry them along with them in all important measures, and in the spirit of benevolence which underlies all their actions, the British Indian Government stand without an equal.” The Press—Seditious opinions are much more likely to be broached in private than in public. Still, the Press, English and Vernacular, under Indian management, may be regarded as largely the exponents of “‘ Native Public Opinion.” The most influential English papers, as the Hindu Patriot and Indian Mirror, are decidedly loyal. They criticise public mea- sures freely, often justly, but without bitterness. The Indian Mirror also seeks to promote kindly feeling between the two races. Similar remarks apply to Madras Native Opinion, under its present management. The writer is not sufficiently acquainted with the Bombay leading Native Journals to describe their character. The inferior English papers are less satisfactory, though, as a rule, they cannot be considered disloyal. The burden of some of them, probably conducted by young men without fixed employ- ment, is the iniquity of the British Government in giving appointments to Englishmen instead of Indians. Of Newspapers in English, conducted by Indians, Sir Richard ‘Temple expresses the following opinions :— “Of the Native Newspapers published in the English language, as yet few in number, some are distinguished by loyalty and good sense as well as by cultivated ability, and are creditable products of the new education; as for instance the ‘ Hindu Patriot’ of Calcutta. Others are notable for a latitude of criticism which, though extreme, does not transgress the limits ordinarily claimed for journalism.” p. 182. | The same writer, from the high offices he held in India, had great advantages for forming an opinion with regard to the Vernacular Press—their principal contents being report- ed weekly to Government. He expresses the following judg- ment :— THE PRESS. | 19 ** Of the vernacular Newspapers, which are much more numerous, many are signally and consistently loyal, while preserving independence in their thought and freedom in their criticism. Others again have been dis- figured occasionally by writings which, though not actually seditious or treasonable, are objectionable in their political tendency and likely to have the effect of causing ill-feeling against British rule, whether that effect is intended or not. Some few contained treasonable passages calculated to excite hatred against British rule. It was the occurrence of these passages from time to time which induced the Government of India to pass the Vernacular Press Act empowering the executive authorities to check the publication of such matter. The appearance of passages politi- cally objectionable, indeed, has not entirely ceased, but has become rare and slight. f “There remains, however, in too many of the Native Newspapers a disposition to find fault with everything and to be pleased with nothing under British rule, to form inflated notions and to ventilate impracticable suggestions.”’* Ité will be seen that Sir Richard Temple, one of the highest authorities on the subject, bears cordial testimony to the general loyalty of the Native Press. He refers, however, to a few papers as containing matter either calculated to cause ill-feeling between the two races or positively disloyal. Their character will best be shown by one or two illustrative quotations from Newspapers in English conducted by Indians. The first is from a well-known journal; the other two are from an obscure print. They are no more the exponents of educated Indian opinion than the National Reformer represents the views of Englishmen. The Hindu Patriot says :— “We cannot resist the temptation of reproducing the following from the Amrita Bazar Patrica: POLITICAL GHOMETRY. Chap. 1st. Definitions. 1. A political point is that which is visible to the Government but invisible to the people. 2. - A line of policy is length without breadth of views. 3. Political figure is that which is enclosed on one side by ambition and another by hypocrisy. 4, A political circle is a plain figure contained by one line of policy, and is such that a certain point within this figure keeps the circumference firm and united. 5. And this point is called interest. 6. A political triangle is a wedge which is usually introduced at the beginning of any new impost. 7. Parallel lines are lines of policy, which though they never meet always tend to the same direction. * India in 1880, pp. 132, 133, - 20 ALLEGED EVIL EFFECTS OF ENGLISH EDUCATION. Chap. 2nd. Postulates. 1. Let it be granted that any tax may be imposed upon any sect or class of the people without their permission. 2. Let it be granted that any measure may be introduced or with- drawn at the pleasure of the Government. 3. Let it be granted that any promise may be made or broken provided there be a nominal pretext at hand. 4, Let it be granted that a deficit may be shown when there is a surplus. Chap, 3rd. Axioms. Might is always right. England governs India for the good of the latter. Things which have a black cover have also a black interior. Things which have a white cover have also a white interior. Black can never be white neither white be black. . The promise or opinion of one individual is equal to the promise or opinion of the whole nation. DoT 9 PO ps Prop. lst. ProBiem, Given a permanently settled Revenue on land to draw a road cess from 1t.* The proceedings of those “ heroes,” ‘‘ co-workers in the cause of social freedom to the people,” the ‘ Nihilists, Fenians, and Communists,” are vindicated in the editorial quoted below. If the American Fenians carry out their programme of blowing up passenger ships with dynamite and assassinating Mr. Gladstone, “‘we do not hold them responsible for the bloody and certainly outrageous acts to which they are obliged to resort.”” As already stated, it is an obscure paper, though published in an important city, and to avoid publicity the name is not given, but the date is the 30th August, 1881 :— “The doings of foreign co-workers in the cause of social freedom to the people, have no small interest for us. Not only do they teach us a great lesson of unflagging perseverance, they also have irresistible attractions for us, in that they are executed under instructions from little knots of resolute, energetic men forming themselves into executive Com- mittees. With more or less prosperity, they have flourished, and extend- ed the scope of their operations, sometimes far and wide, not only in Europe, but in America as well. The reader need not be told, of course, that we are alluding to the heroes of the Socialistic propaganda. We are far from condemning the line of policy adopted by the Nihilists, Fenians, and Communists, inasmuch as we do not hold them responsible for the bloody, and certainly outrageous deeds to which they are obliged to resort. We bewail the perversity of the powers that be, who give a handle to these people to perpetrate excesses, from which even a naked barbarian would shudder. As it is, we vindicate the conduct of this class, in that they * This extract appeared several years ago. The writer at one time took in the paper, but he was so disgusted with its tone, that he gave it up. No recent speci- men is therefore available. é THE PRESS. 21 cannot be held accountable for what they are compelled to do. Give them the privileges they want, and they will certainly desist from further loathsome deeds. Withhold these from them, and if they be guilty of any excesses, it is you, who goad them to do so.” An editorial of a later date (Sept. 20, 1881) thus describes the policy of the English :— * By setting Hindu against Mahomedan, Kashmiri against Bengali, Parsee against Mahratta, they hope to keep all these races in perpetual bondage and subjugation. We feel it sickening to think of this. But it is too true.” The course recommended is the following :— ** Under the rule of a people who have no sympathy for us, who have systematically ignored our rights and robbed us of our immense wealth, it would be hoping against hope to look forward to an improvement of affairs. Under the circumstances, it is incumbent on us to cherish for one another brotherly love and attachment. Let us for good forego the unnatural antipathy against one another. Let the Hindustani for ever cease to look upon the Punjabi as a foreigner, let the Madrasi be ashamed of picking a hole in the Parsee’s pocket. Im one word, let us unite and conquer. Our rulers have acted on the aphorism of ‘divide and conquer. Let us have ‘unite and conquer’ for our motto; and we hope the national cause will look up. Let us ‘boycot’ one another, if we attempt in any way to injure our mutual interests. No objection can be taken to our well-to-do friends, who have now and again to dance attendance on local huzoors, pretending before the latter to profess ill- feeling against those these (sic) will have us do simply with a view to please them. But we must never actually foster any rancour against our fellow- countrymen. We must somehow or other serve our interests, and for once in our dealings with our rulers, by hook or by crook. We have had sufficient proofs given us for doubting their sincerity. We have been convinced that as a conquering nation, they somehow cannot bring them- selves to concede to us privileges they acknowledge to be common to all human beings. They want, in spite of their asseverations to the contrary, that we should never be able to raise our head, that they the more leisurely suck our life-blood. But this sinister motive can be defeated by adopting the plan we have submitted.” During the Mutiny a Native regiment at Allahabad gave in the morning the loudest assurances of their loyalty, and murder- ed their officers in the evening at mess. A similar course of duplicity, it will be seen, is recommended by this patriot. The Indian Mirror had the following remarks on some of the Native Newspapers* :— Any one who will go through the weekly reports on the Native papers, cannot help thinking that in the current vocabulary of our contemporaries, education means the loss of respect for the Government; public spirit * This was before the passing of the Vernacular Press Act. 22 ALLEGED EVIL EFFECTS OF ENGLISH EDUCATION, - is synonymous with empty bluster; patriotism is hatred of Englishmen, and impartiality is gross abuse.” It is satisfactory that such journals are condemned by enlight- ened Native opinion. A correspondent addresses the Indian Mirror as follows :— “Tt pains me extremely to read some of the articles of the Amrita Bazar Patrica. The Editor of that paper, doubtless misguided by false notions of patriotism, has taken into his head of serving his country by heaping censures upon the character of the ruling race of the land. I shall not stop here to enquire into the justness or otherwise of such censures. Suffice it to say that even if they were true, the mode in which they have been expressed shows a spirit of hostility little calculated to reconcile the conquerors with the conquered. Such indiscreet, go-ahead effusions render the breach between the Huropeans and the Natives still wider, and make those Englishmen who have really the welfare of India at their hearts think that their sympathy is wasted upon beings who do not possess a spark of gratitude in them. “ Fair criticism, made in a-spirit of soberness, is always palatable. But wholesale denunciations are not only unpalatable to them against whom they are aimed, but they show a shallowness of spirit and a want of charitable feeling in those that make use of them. ‘They are the only safety-valves of pseudo-patriotic feelings. “It costs very little trouble of thought to call a nation a nation of liars and hypocrites. To vilify the whole nation in a journal in such a way is to abuse the privilege of journalism. It is hardly fair to abuse in- discriminately a whole nation under shelter of such a privilege. The constant occurrence of such a thing may justify the Government to make measures for curtailing the powers of the press, however sacred they ought to be held in all civilized societies.”* A Bengali shows, that for his countrymen to be disloyal would not only display the “blackest ingratitude,’ but be “ suicidal :’?— | “Tt is a thousand pities, however, that Bengali writers, of all people in the world, should use strong language against the British Govern- ment. Of all people in British India, Bengalis have the least reason to be discontented with the Government. ‘The Mahomedan, whose dominion has been overthrown, the Mahratta and the Sikh, whose independence has been subverted, may have some reason for disaffection; the Bengali, none. The Bengali never had dominion; and he had been deprived of his liberty half a millennium before the Anglo-Saxon set foot on Bengal. And during those dreary centuries he was the prey of every rapacious conqueror. He was despised by the Hindustani, robbed by the Mahratta, and treated as a slave by the Mahomedan. It is only since the ascend- ancy of British power that the Bengali has begun to look up. It would, in our opinion, be an act of the blackest ingratitude, if Bengalis showed any disaffection to that very government to whose beneficence they owe their present advance over the rest of the people of India. But the manifestation of such a spirit of disaffection on the part of Bengalis would be not only an ungrateful but a suicidal act. Suppose, for a * Letter dated 26th June, 1874. f j f Cs THE PRESS. 23 moment, that the British power in India were overthrown—God grant that the shadow of the British Lion may never grow less!—but make the supposition, however improbable it may be, that, by a hitherto un- heard-of combination of all the Princes and Chieftains of India, and by a sudden and simultaneous rising of the Sikhs, the Mahrattas and the Rajputs, the British power were overthrown—we should like to know where the Bengalis would then be. Physically the weakest people in all India, without exaggeration, and the least warlike, they would be an easy prey to any adventurer that chose to lord it over them. Nor would Universities, Colleges, Schools, and the Degrees of Bachelors and Masters of Arts, be of any avail on that terrible day. The stalwart Sikh, the energetic Mahratta, and the brave Rajput, would laugh at our hopeless weakness, our English learning, and our loud talk, and, re- garding us as the proteges of the hated Feringhi, would rob us of our riches and of our honour, would render our condition more miserable than it has ever been in the worst days of British domination,—thus making us objects of commiseration to a pitying universe. It is on these grounds that we would advise our brethren of the vernacular press to avoid tall talk, to rest and be thankful; and if they have any representations to make to the ‘powers that be,’ to make them in decent, moderate and respectful language.” The Bengal Messenger. Sir Richard Temple sums up his conclusions as follows :— “ Of late, certain symptoms of disloyalty manifested by some limited sections of certain educated classes have caused reflections to be made against the effects of education upon Native loyalty. But that disloyalty was traceable to social and traditional circumstances quite apart from educational causes, and was checked, not fostered or encouraged by educa- tion. There doubtless will be found disloyal individuals among the educated classes, as there are among all classes in a country subjected to foreign rule. Nevertheless a well-founded assurance may be entertained that those Natives who have learned to think through the medium of the language, and are embued with the literature and the philosophy of England, will bear towards the English nation that heart-felt allegiance which men may feel without at all relinquishing their own nationality.”* The fear is more with regard to the future. Sir Richard Temple makes the following admission :— _ “There is danger of discontent being engendered in the minds of educated Natives if adequate and suitable employment does not offer itself to them in various directions. As all the arts‘and sciences, which have helped to make England what she is, are offered for, even pressed on, the acceptance of the Natives, it must be expected that those who do accept these advantages, will be animated by hopes and stirred by emotions, to which they were previously strangers} They will evince an increasing jealousy of any monopoly of advantage in any respect being maintained in favour of Europeans. They are already raising a cry louder and louder, the purport of which is India for the Indians. They discern, or think they discern, undue liberality in some, and unwise parsimony in other branches of the public expenditure, in reference to Native interests.” pp. 133, 134. | * India in 1880, p. 136. 24 ALLEGED EVIL EFFECTS OF ENGLISH EDUCATION. The danger indicated in the above quotation is so important, that it will be noticed at some length another another head. It is to be hoped that there is less now of the haughty demeanour of which the English have been justly accused. But to some, who complain of it most loudly, may be said, “‘ First cast out the beam out of thine own eye.” The Indian Mirror has the following :— “Tf ten Englishmen behave haughtily towards the Natives, they deserve to be condemned, and they will be condemned throughout the civilized world by every right-thinking man. What we contend for is that while we are apt to animadvert on the overbearing conduct of a certain class of Englishmen, we seem indifferent or perhaps blind to the same defect in ourselves.” The Times of India says, ‘‘ No Englishman treats the Natives of this country with the contempt and insolence which high caste Hindoos habitually display towards their low-caste brethren.” An American writer has the following remarks on changes of Government :— “The form of Government must naturally vary according to the intelli- gence and virtue of the people. If, then, any citizens would influence the Government, if they would render it more mild and liberal, they must seek to enlighten and reform the great body of the people. The State, adapting its Government to the qualifications of the people, will be constrained to give them liberty according as they are prepared to receive it. “ Revolution with a view to more liberty, must prove an inevitable failure unless the people are qualified for freedom. The struggle for independence, if it results in the overthrow of a Government, is followed by a brief reign of anarchy, which is finally quelled by a military despotism, and succeeded by a Government more despotic than the preceding. The unwise citizens who engage in the struggle, lose their labor, and perhaps also their blood, and make things worse than they were when they began to agitate. “Their way to higher liberty, then, is not in direct revolutionary mea- sures, but in laboring to exalt the people to higher capabilities. They may thus secure from the State an increasingly liberal Government, as the people are able to appreciate and sustain it.” It is encouraging to find that similar advice is sometimes given by Native papers. The Indian Mirror says :— “ Of all the races that contended for the mastery of the empire, the English, we suppose, had the least chance of coming out victorious. There is something in the entire concern which tells us that God in His all-seeing wisdom brought them to direct the affairs of this vast con- tinent. A patriot, therefore, sees providence or ‘God in History.’ The very same finger that points out to him the divine hand in the national annals, informs us also that it is very foolish to contend against the decree of the Almighty. God wishes that India should be regenerated through the instrumentality of the English nation. Every page of its history has been written by Him. Is it possible for us to fight with the most High? If our countrymen are atheists, let them venture to say so. We read their fate by the history of Bulwant Phadke. But if they do believe in a living God, ‘let them calmly content themselves THE PRESS. 25 with a cheerful disposition to abide by his Providence. And has not God written many hopeful chapters for us? Let us study the political creed of an honest patriot. The perusal of history convinces us that no nation can be politically strong which is not morally, religiously, and intellect- ually strong; and no reform is possible which does not begin from within. A patriot, therefore, begins his real warfare in the human heart. There are those great enemies which have overthrown the Hindu nation. They are not your Afghans, or Moguls, or Mahrattas or Hnglishmen, but the great foes which go by the name of immorality, sensuality, crime, disunion, jealousy, unbelief, superstition and untruth. “One of the most sensible petitions,” remarks a contemporary, “and one of the strongest reflections upon the unreasoning latitudinarianism of the newest improved system of education in India, is a petition pre- sented the other day to the Lieutenant-Governor by the Dacca Philanthro- pic Society, presumably chiefly Mussulmans, praying Government to introduce the teaching of morality in all its educational institutions. The arguments used are very clearly put, and of great weight, and the petitioners state what has long been evident to others besides themselves, that ‘they themselves, with the rest of native society, are beginning to suffer from the consequences of the neglect of moral training among the educated native youths of Bengal.’ What a reflection on a so-called Chris- tian and civilized Government. Instead of the wholesale destruction of religious principle of every description, which has characterized the latest attempt at fairness between all castes and sects, how much more wise and statesman-like would it have been to take hold of and work the principles of true morality and religion which underlie all systems, at least all systems which find place in this country.’ The reply, however, is very discouraging and steers clear of the request.” Oct. 27, 1875. Whatever may be the case with regard to other forms of vice, intemperance has undoubtedly increased. Although its ravages have not been confined to the educated classes, these have been the severest sufferers. The evil is worst in Calcutta, where the aes Classes are the wealthiest, and English has been longest studied. The Hindu Patriot thus describes the results :— 36 ALLEGED EVIL EFFECTS OF ENGLISH EDUCATION. ‘“‘ We have daily, nay hourly, evidences of the ravages which the brandy bottle is making upon the flower of our society. Wealth, rank, honor and character, health and talents, have all perished in the blighting presence of this huge monster. Notwithstanding the improved education and resources of our higher classes, it is a notorious fact that they can now save very little, and this new feature of our domestic and social economy is, in a great measure, due to the fell drink-craving. Families once flourishing have been reduced to absolute pauperism by the wreck brought by it.”, At the last Indian Budget debate Mr. O’ Donnell said :— “The honourable member for the city of London read an extract from a letter received, as he knew, from some of the most influential, moderate and intelligent representatives of Native opinion, referring to the profound uneasiness with which all Indians who loved their race and country, re- garded the efforts made by the Government of India to introduce drinking habits among the people.” Professor Monier Williams on Government Education in India. The Oxford Professor of Sanskrit, from his position and pre- vious studies, had special advantages for forming an intelligent judgment on this subject. His general impressions are given as follows :— “If our whole educational responsibility is bounded by the instruction of the upper classes of the people in European knowledge, we may perhaps take credit to ourselves for a fairly respectable fulfilment of our obligations. ‘* But if our mission be to educate as well as instruct, to draw out as well as put in, to form the mind as well as inform it, to teach our pupils how to become their future self-teachers, to develop symmetrically their physi- cal as well as mental, moral, and religious faculties, then I fear we have left undone much that we ought to have done, and acquitted ourselves im- perfectly of the duties our position in India imposes upon us. Let me first glance at our so-called higher education. “In traversing India from north to south, from east to west, I visited many High Schools, examined many classes, conversed with many young Indians under education at our colleges, and was brought into contact with a large number who had passed the University matriculation examin- ation, as well as with a few who had taken their degrees, and earned dis- tinction for high proficiency.. I certainly met some really well-educated men—like Rao Bahadur Gopal Hari Deshmukh, lately appointed a joint- judge—who, by their character and acquirements, were fitted to fill any office or shine in any society. But in plain truth, I was not always favourably impressed with the general results of our higher educational efforts. I came across a few well-informed men, many half-informed men, and a great many ill-informed and ill-formed men—men, I mean, without true strength of character and with ill-balanced minds. Such men may have read a great deal, but if they think at all, think loosely. Many are great talkers. They may be said to suffer from attacks of verbal diarrhoea, and generally talk plausibly, but write inaccurately. They are not given to much sustained exertion. Or if such men act at all, they act as if guided by no settled principles, and as if wholly irresponsible for their spoken and written words. They know nothing of the motive power, restraining force, or comforting efficacy of steadfast faith in any religious system what- | ever, whether false or true. They neglect their own languages, disre- gard their own literatures, abjure their own religions, despise their own PROFESSOR WILLIAMS ON GOVERNMENT EDUCATION. Oo” philosophies, break their own caste-rules, and deride their own time- honoured customs, without becoming good English scholars, honest sceptics, wise thinkers, earnest Christians, or loyal subjects of the British empire. ‘Vet it cannot be said that we make higher education consist in the mere imparting of information, and nothing more. We really effect a mighty transformation in the character of our pupils. We teach a native to believe in himself. We deprecate his not desiring to be better than his fathers. We bid him beware of merging his personality in his caste. We imbue him with an intense consciousness of individual existence. We puff him up with an overweening opinion of his own sufficiency. We inflate him with a sublime sense of his own importance as a distinct unit in the body politic. We reveal to him the meaning of ‘I am,’ ‘I can,’ ‘I will,’ ‘I shall,’ and ‘I know,’ without inculcating any lesson of ‘IT ought,’ and ‘I ought not,’ without implanting any sense of responsibility to and dependence on an Eternal, Almighty, and All-wise Being for life, for strength, and for knowledge—without, in short, imparting real self- knowledge, or teaching true self-mastery, or instilling high principles and high motives. Such a system carries with it its own nemesis. After much labour we rulers of India turn out what we call an educated native. Whereupon he turns round upon us, and, instead of thanking us for the trouble we have taken in his behalf, revenges himself upon us for the injury we have inflicted on his character by applying the imperfect education he has received to the injury of his teachers. “The spitefully seditious writing which our Government has lately found it necessary to repress by summary measures is due to this cause. ** And how have we discharged the debt we owe to the lower classes P Let the truth here also be told with all plainness. In their case we have not yet matured any effective scheme—not even for the proper informing of their minds, much less for the proper forming of their characters...... A good beginning has been made in some parts of India. But I fear we have as yet barely stirred the outer surface of the vast inert mass of popular ignorance and superstition.’”’* It is freely admitted that allowance ought to be made for the circumstances of the case, for the immense difficulties in the way of improvement. Some of the defects noticed are not peculiar to India. The great schools of England, and Oxford itself, would yield some specimens of “ half-informed,” “ ill-informed,” and **ill-formed”’ men, such as Professor Williams met in his travels. Even those who have enjoyed the greatest moral and religious advantages have often sorrowfully to say with the devout Faber, before retiring to rest, “The day is gone, its hours have run, And Thou hast taken count of all The scanty triumphs grace hath won— The broken vow, the frequent fall.” The conclusion drawn is, that every effort should be made to render the Government system of education as effective as possible in preventing the “alleged” evils, and in producing the greatest amount of good. * Modern India and the Indians. 3rd Ed. pp. 302—305. PROCEEDINGS OF LORD NORTHBROOK. Lord Northbrook came out to India in 1872. As might be expected, he took a warm interest in education, from the lowest to the highest. He visited schools, questioned the pupils, ex- amined their exercises, as well as gave addresses as Chancellor of the Calcutta University. What especially struck his Lordship was the want of adapta- tion to India in the text-books used in schools. It is a common charge brought against us, that, with insular pride, we think everything about us the best for all places and all circumstances. Hence, in some cases, precisely the same books have been used in India as in Britain. Lord Northbrook’s views were expressed in “ Proceedings of the Government of India in the Home De- partment (Education) No. 143, dated Fort William, the 29th March, 1873.” The Hindu Patriot thus commented on the Resolution so far as elementary books are concerned :— “The things taught about should be within easy reach of the pupil’s comprehension; it 1s time and trouble thrown away, if a beginner’s mind is distracted at the outset with the difficulties of a foreign language and names of things which are not within his every day experience. Gradually he should be led from the familiar to the foreign. That these obviously just principles of rudimentary education should be ignored in practice is strange indeed, but that in some cases they are so is a fact. The books, which are now in fashion, have been designed especially for English youths, with rosy cheeks, fireside associations, and Christmas memories, and for more reasons than one they are utterly unsuited to Bengali lads who have not perhaps commenced their teens.” 19th May, 1873. The above remarks refer only to elementary books. The “ Resolution” expressly admits that ‘ the more advanced student may be required rapidly to acquaint himself with a variety of new ideas and of references to things which open out fresh lines of thought or points of view.” Lord Northbrook could person- _ ally examine only the English text-books. Ina pamphlet, ‘ For Special Circulation only,” the writer submitted to his Lordship passages from Government and University Vernacular Text- Books showing that some of them contained idolatrous and im- moral teaching. One or two illustrations of the first class of objectionable passages may be given. Some Madras Government School Books taught the boys to pray to Ganesa, the Hindu god of wisdom, for success in their studies ; to serve Vishnu; to meditate on the name of Siva. Both Madras and Punjab Government School Books praised Muhammad as “the Prince of the universe, the Glory of crea- tures, the Mediator of both worlds.” A Punjab Text Book, RESULTS OF SCHOOL BOOK COMMITTEES. 39 the Bostan, declared that Muhammad, before casting out Lat and Uzza, idols worshipped by the Arabs, abrogated the Old and New Testaments, Pantheism and Fatalism were also taught. Both Madras and Punjab books contained filthy stories, here unmentionable.* Hence the Resolution of the Government of India, with the Appended Note. All Local Governments and Administrations were requested to : “ Appoint Committees to examine and report upon the class books that are now prescribed in all those schools which receive any formal support from the State in order to discover defects either in form or substance, and to adapt more carefully the course of authorised reading to the general educational policy.” Reports oF Scuoot-Book ComMITTEES. The writer has before him the Reports of the Bengal, Punjab, Bombay, and Madras Committees. ‘There may be others which he has not seen. The Report of the Bengal Committee is very brief, but it is based on four large ledgers, including 3800 reports from head- masters of schools. The Punjab and Bombay Reports deal chiefly with vernacular books. ‘The Madras Report treats largely of English School-Books, and enters more into detail. As might be expected from the preponderance of Government educational officers, the Reports largely reflect the past educational policy pursued. The Bombay Report exhibits more of the outside element. Still, all the Reports contain valuable information. ReEsutts oF ScHoot-Book COMMITTEES. Two of these may be noticed. 1. Lhe Expurgation of some Vernacular Text Books. The writer does not possess information regarding all the Indian Vernaculars, but as far as his knowledge goes, there has been substantial improvement in this respect. Such a result alone would be ample compensation for the labour of the School- Book Committees. 2. The Compilation of English School Books. Lord Northbrook was first led to appoint Committees by the defects he observed in these. When his “ Resolution” was issued, the Hindu Patriot admitted its truth in words which have already been quoted. As the principle is of considerable importance, and * It should be explained that books containing such passages were not written for the Government Educational Department; they were Native School Books adopted in their entirety. 40 IMPORTANCE OF SCHOOL-BOOKS. strange to say, is yet largely ignored in some schools, an ex- tract may be made from the Report of the Bengal Committee, after an examination of the largest number of English text- books :— “(a.) They are unanimously of opinion that the information elicited by their inquiries confirms the belief expressed by the Government of India in its Resolution of 29th March 1873, that the books now used are not altogether accordant with what appears to be a sound principle of elementary education, namely, that the contents of the books taught shall be as much as possible within easy range of the pupils’ compre- hension and ordinary experience. They find that with regard to the great majority of school books used in the schools of Bengal, the books edited and published in England, especially in the departments of Hng- lish literature and history, are generally unsuited to the capacities of native students. Many of these books are occasionally offensive to their national and religious feelings. They contain frequent allusions to European and classical history, altogether peyond the range of school- boy reading in this country; and with hardly an exception, they pre- suppose a familiarity with English home scenes and English domestic life, such as cannot possibly be possessed or even realised by Indian boys. On the other hand many of the text-books that have been published in India, and prepared specially for the use of natives of this country, have been allowed to fall behind the age, and have become obsolete; many are full of inaccuracies both in matter and style; and nearly all need improvement in the mere outward form, being badly and incorrectly printed on very inferior paper, badly bound, and costly withal.” The main object of this letter is to review the books which have been published, but this cannot be done satisfactorily with- out settling some general principles. IMPORTANCE OF SCHOOL-BOOKS. Some depreciate School-Books, alleging that every thing depends upon the teacher. There is no doubt that a good workman is of more consequence than good tools, but the slightest reflection shows that very much also depends upon the latter. In some cases an inferior workman with good tools will do as much as a good workman badly supplied in this respect. But both are requisite. Every means should be employed to provide good teachers, but at the same time efforts should also be made to supply good text-books. The latter are far more attainable. Probably three generations at least must pass away and thirty crores of rupees be expended before India can be supplied with trained teachers; three years and an outlay of three lakhs would secure a satisfactory series of School-Books which might be reproduced in each language. AIMS OF GOVERNMENT EDUCATION. 41 The late Dr. Duff was one of the ablest and most successful educationists in India. He expresses the following opinion about School-Books :— “ ¢Give me,’ says one ‘the songs of a country, and I will Jet any one else make its laws.’ ‘Give me,’ says another, ‘the school-books of a country, and I will let any one else make both its songs and its laws.’ That early impressions—impressions co-eval with the first dawnings of intelligence, impressions made when a new world is opening with the freshness of morning upon the soul—are at once the most vivid and most indelible, has passed into a proverb.” An intelligent teacher, if compelled to use inferior class books, will make up largely for their deficiencies by oral instruction. In India, however, except in a few superior schools, as Mr. Hodgson Pratt, formerly Inspector of Schools in Bengal, observes, ‘The book is every thing, for the Master cannot supply what it fails to give.” | But even in the case of the best teachers, it is a great advan- tage to have good text-books. Oral instruction must be limited, and if the pupils can read as well as hear, the lessons will be doubly impressed upon the mind. In England any information which it is desirable to place before the people can at once be made known by means of the public journals. Here the Native Press is yet in its infancy, and probably does not affect more than one per cent of the popu- lation. The country is gradually being covered with a net-work of schools, and influence will be exerted by them which will permeate every corner of the empire. The views expressed are supported by the Educational Despatch of 1854 :— “70, Equal in importance to the training of schoolmasters, is the provision of Vernacular School-Books which shall provide European infor- mation to be the object of study in the lower classes of schools. Some- thing has, no doubt, been done of late years towards this end, but more still remains to be done.” AIMS OF GOVERNMENT EDUCATION. Means should be adapted tothe ends in view. The character of School-Books should depend upon the nature of the education to be imparted. Extracts from the Hducational Despatch will show the objects which it contemplates :— “2. Among many subjects of importance, none can have a stronger claim to our attention than that of education. It is one of our most sacred duties to be the means, as far as in us lies, of conferring upon the natives of India those vast moral and material blessings which flow from the general diffusion of useful knowledge, and which India may, under providence, derive from her connexion with England. 42 AIMS OF GOVERNMENT EDUCATION, “3. We have, moreover, always looked upon the encouragement of education as peculiarly important, because calculated ‘not only to produce a higher degree of intellectual fitness, but to raise the moral character of those who partake of its advantages, and so to supply you with servants to whose probity you may, with increased confidence, commit offices of trust’ in India, where the well-being of the people is so intimately connected with the truthfulness and ability of officers of every grade in all Departments of the State.” The above may be summed up as follows :— The aims of Government education are, 1. To promote the temporal well-being of the people of India; 2. To elevate them intellectually ; 3. To raise their moral character. No course of education can be considered complete which does not combine these three objects, though different importance will be attached to each by different persons. Mr. Fowler, Inspector of Schools, Madras Presidency, to his excellent Discipline and Instruction, prefixes as a motto Milton’s noble words :— “The end then of learning is to repair the ruin of our first parents by regaining to know God aright, and out of that knowledge to love Him, to imitate Him, to be like Him.” The Maharaja of Travancore recently quoted with approval the following good statement of the aim of education. Address- ing the students of his college he said :— “T am exceedingly glad to hear from the Principal that, ‘ to set before young minds a lofty ideal of what their lives may be made and to guide them wisely in the first steps towards its attainment is no light or irresponsible task, and only in so far as we masters have done this, can we be said to have succeeded, however splendid the results of University Examinations may be.’ Surely, this is the key of educational success.”’* The points which education should include will be noticed in turn, with remarks where they seem necessary. Educational truisms will be dwelt upon, if neglected in actual practice. SUBJECTS OF INSTRUCTION. 1. Reapine, Waritine, AnD ARITHMETIC. With regard to these there is no controversy. The only ques- tions are regarding the best modes of teaching them. 2. LITERATURE, Here also there is no difference of opinion about the subject. The dispute turns upon the space it should occupy in education. a * Travancore Diocesan Gazette, August, 1881. SUBJECTS OF INSTRUCTION. 43 3. Naturat ScIEence. This is one of the most vexed questions in Indian education. To some extent it is settled with regard to the Universities, but it is still open so far as schools are concerned. Past Neglect. For about half a century literature and mathematics constituted nearly the sum total of the teaching in Government Colleges. This was but natural. The stream cannot be expected to rise higher than its source. Most of the Professors were Oxford or Cambridge graduates, and sought to impart to the youth of India such an education as they had themselves received. Some modifi- cations were necessary. English literature was substituted for that of Greece and Rome. : Mr. Lowe, now Viscount Sherbrooke, was a distinguished Oxford graduate, a fellow of a College, and ‘obtained the repu- tation of being one of the best private tutors in the University.’’* He had therefore good opportunities for acquiring a knowledge of the state of education at Oxford. In an address delivered at Edinburgh in 1867, he says :— “JT will now give you a catalogue of things which a highly-educated man—one who may have received the best education at the highest public schools, or at Oxford—may be in total ignorance of. He will probably know nothing of the anatomy of his own body. He will not have the slightest idea of the difference between’ the arteries and the veins, and he may not know whether the spleen is placed on the right or the left side of his spine. He may have no knowledge of the simplest truths of physics, or would not be able to explain the barometer or thermometer. He knows nothing of the simplest laws of animal or vegetable life.” ‘“With the new world which chemistry is expanding before us—with the old world that geology has called again into existence—with the wonderful generalization with regard to plants and animals, and all those noble studies and speculations which are the glory and distinction and life-blood of the time in which we live, our youth remain, almost with- out exception, totally ignorant.” pp. 25, 26. Testimony will now be adduced to show that a very similar state of things existed in India until a very recent period. Many years ago the Bengal Council of Education remarked :— “The want of every thing of a practical character in the educational course at present appears to the Council to be its greatest defect. Every thing that strikes the senses, one-half of the whole circle of knowledge is, as it were,ignored in our present scheme of education. This, the Council incline to think, would bea grave defect in any country, but they cannot doubt it is so in India.” * Chamber’s Cyclopsedia, 4,4, SUBJECTS OF INSTRUCTION. In 1853, Sir George Campbell observed :— ** With respect to the quality of Government education, the great mistake seems to be the preference of English literature to science.”* In the Bengal Public Instruction Report for 1856-57, Mr. Hodgson Pratt, then Inspector of Schools, says :— “We have so long given exclusive importance to Classics and Mathe- matics, that the young Baboos regard the Physical Sciences with contempt. There could not be stronger evidence of the defects of our past system. If there is one thing more than another which (religion apart) educationists ought to strive for in this country, it is to awaken these ‘books in chudders,’ as they have been wisely and wittily called, to the ‘ pleasures and advantages of Science.’ To encourage them to pursue Classics and Mathematics to the exclusion of every thing else, is to perpetuate the very faults which especially distinguish the mental character of the so-called educated classes. “TI know that all suggestions of this kind are met bya cry, that we are going to substitute a smattering of every thing for a knowledge of two or three things; but it is worth enquiring whether we have not been teaching many things of little or no use whatever. I would ask why should Greeshchunder Chuckerbutty be expected to know ‘ what cir- cumstances enabled Shakespere to exhibit an accurate knowledge of Greek Mythology,’ or ‘in what respect the Dramatic compositions called ‘Mysteries’ differ from those called ‘ Moralities,’ and other facts of a like nature P On the other hand, it is of very great importance, that he should see clearly the danger of living with an open sewer running under the lower floor of his house, or the cruelty of marrying his children at an immature age, or the impolicy of exhausting the soil of his fields by the disregard of important principles in Chemistry: and it is very important that his mind should comprehend the sublimity and beauty of the laws by which his own body and every thing around him are governed ; and that his heart should, if possible, be awakened to the great facts and conclusions of Natural Theology.”’+ Professor Max Miiller, in 1871, said that “the educational system now in force in India, with certain indispensible modifi- cations, has been framed after the model of the Schools and Universities of Hngland.’’f “A Plea for Physical Science in our Schools and Universities” had to appear in the Madras Mail, of March 4th, 1874. Some preceding extracts are corroborated by the following :— “ A man may become a Master of Arts in Madras without knowing why - an apple falls to the ground, where rain comes from, what is the meaning of a burning stick, why he has to breathe constantly, or what the sun means by oceasionally disappearing at inconvenient times. Our opinion then, is that the Madras standard of liberal education is defective, We do not wish to exalt Physical Science at the expense of the other branches of education, but we think that to ignore it practically altogether is an * “Tndia as it may be,” p. 403. + Bengal Public Instruction Report, 1856-57, Ap. A., pp. 2, 3. } Contemporary Review, Sept. 1871. i NATURAL SCIENCE. 45 evil. We think it particularly an evil in India, the native of which has never shown any active curiosity about the material world. It is to him a world managed and mismanaged by gods and devils, and he is quite con- tent to let it remain so. He is essentially superstitious and his present education has little tendency to release him from that condition.” “Tf we look at education from the utilitarian point of view, the physical sciences, coupled with some knowledge of mathematics, are the most impor- tant subjects of study for anation to encourage. There is no doubt that the material prospects of nations depend upon their attitude towards those branches of education which teach how to make the most of their re- sources.” Max Miller, in 1871, said of the “ old Schools and Universities” at home that they were ‘“‘ bestirring themselves, trying hard to adapt their powerful machinery to the requirements of a new age.” Some progress has been made in India in the same direction. Present Requirements in Colleges. It is to the credit of the Bombay University that it was the first to introduce Physical Science into the Entrance Examination. For many years, if not from the commencement, an elementary knowledge of the following has been compulsory:— (a.) The mechanical powers, (b.) The laws of chemical combination, the chemistry of air and water, and the phenomena of combustion. (c.) The solar system. The Madras University now requires the following :— Chemistry.—Professor Roscoe’s Chemistry to the end of Art. 52. (Science Primer Series). Elements of Physics.—Professor Balfour Stewart’s Physics. (Science Primer Series) first 67 paragraphs. The Calcutta University, according to the Calendar of 1881- 82, does not require any physical science at the Entrance Exami- nation. As the bulk of the students do not go beyond this,* they finish their course before science 1s commenced. The old idea that mental training is to be secured through languages and mathematics, seems still to bein the ascendant at Calcutta, though the late Mr. Woodrow, Dr. Rajendralala Mitra, and others, have fought strenuously for science. A Vice- Chancellor opposed its introduction in the Entrance Examination on the following grounds :— “T feel assured that any greater and especially any earlier encourage- ment of such studies can only be given at the expense of the general train- ing and discipline of the mental faculties which it has been and I believe always should be, the essential policy of our examinations to secure, and which is, I believe, absolutely requisite for a profitable study of the natural sciences themselves.” March 24th, 1874. * The total candidates at the Examinations of the three Indian Universities in 1879+ 80 were as follows: Matriculation 7,147; First Arts, 1787; B. A. 597; M. A. 33. 46 SUBJECTS OF INSTRUCTION. The late J. S. Mill, expressed the following opinion at St. Andrews :— “There is no intellectual discipline more important than that which the experimental sciences afford. Their whole occupation consists in doing well, what all of us, during the whole of life, are engaged in doing, for the most part badly. All men do not affect to be reasoners, but all profess and really attempt to draw inferences from experience: yet hardly any one, who has not been a student of the physical sciences, sets out with any just idea of what the process of interpreting experience really is.” The first reason urged by the British Association for teaching science in schools was; “ As providing the best discipline in observation and collection of facts, in the combination of inductive with deductive reasoning, and in accuracy both of thought and language.” At the higher examinations all the Universities recognize science either as an optional or a compulsory subject. Science in Schools. The battle of Physical Science for admission into the Univer- sities may be considered as fought and won. There is still the question, may it be taught in Schools? The Home Government appointed a Royal Commission on Scientific Instruction, composed of men like Tyndall and Huxley. The following are some of the “General Observations’ of the Commission :— “94, From a consideration of the evidence we are of opinion that instruction in the elements of natural science can be, and eventually ought to be, made an essential part of the course of instruction in every elementary school. “95. The instruction to which we refer, though scientific in sub- stance, should, in form, be deprived of needless technicality, and should be almost wholly confined to such facts as can be brought under the direct observation of the scholar. It should, in fact, be conveyed by object lessons, so arranged and methodized as to give an intelligent idea of those more prominent phenomena which lie around every child, and which he is apt to pass by without notice. “26. A course of object lessons of the nature here indicated could be given even to the junior classes of elementary schools, not only without in any way interfering with the efficiency of other instruction, but with the effect of aiding the general development of the intelligence of the children; and similar advantages would attend teaching of a like kind, but of a somewhat more advanced character, in the senior classes.” “The scientific instruction thus afforded would, within the narrow limits to which it extends, give a sound acquaintance with the elements of physical science.” Report, p. xvi. The objection is frequently brought forward that teachers are incapable of giving lessons in science. The Royal Commissioners say :— SCIENCE IN SCHOOLS. 47 «We have the evidence of highly competent authorities to show that the scientific instruction which was given by ordinary elementary school teachers, before the introduction of the Revised Code of 1861, was, in many instances, sound and valuable in itself and beneficial to the pupils.” p. xil. . Every thing depends, of course, upon the nature of the teach- ing; but, if given as directed above, it is quite practicable even in India. The subjects to be taught have to be considered. The Report of the British Association points out the “ important distinc- tion between scientific information and scientific training.” “Both of these should co-exist, we think, at any school which professes to offer the highestliberal education; and at every school it will be easy to provide at least for giving some scientific information.” Among the subjects on which “ scientific information” may be given are the following :— . 1. The Laws of Health—The Honourable H. S. Cunningham, addressing Madras students, said:— * Knowledge, like charity, should begin at home, and as each one of us has a most curious, delicate, complex piece of machinery entrusted to his care, the regular working of which is all-important to his well-being, a properly educated person should, I think, know something of its structure, of the laws which regulate its operations, of the things which strengthen or exhaust it, of the causes which bring it to a stand-still. That machine is the human body, and the branch of Physical Science which tells you about it is styled Physiology, and the laws which regulate its well-being are styled laws of Hygiene, the violation of which costs many hundreds of thousands of lives every year, and produces an indescribable quantity of suffering and misery besides.” Mr. Cunningham states that a million and a half lives are lost every year in India by fever. Much of this mortality is prevent- able by the observance of a few simple sanitary laws which might be taught in schools. The value of quinine and the cheap preparation. as a substitute, might be explained. Small-pox — formerly cut off myriads, while it blinded or disfigured one- fourth of the human race. The advantages of vaccination should be pointed out. 3 The origin of cholera is still involved in mystery, but there is no question that insanitary conditions increase the severity of its ravages. Hven in England there is still lamentable ignorance among the masses with regard to the simplest principles of sanitary science. Professor Huxley remarks, “If any one is interested in the laws of health, it is the poor workman, whose strength is wasted by ill-prepared food, whose health is sapped by bad ventilation and bad drainage, and half whose children are massacred by disorders which might be prevented.” Much 48 SUBJECTS OF INSTRUCTION. more is such information necessary in India. Efforts are now being made by Government to enforce sanitary regulations. Next to the imposition of new taxes, these are perhaps what the people most dishke in ourrule. They are looked upon as arbitrary freaks or part of that “eternal hurry-scurry” in which Englishmen delight, to be evaded by the people wherever it can be done with safety. Simple lessons in Reading Books would show the object of such rules, and tend to secure the willing co-operation of the people. 2. Botany and Natural History.— Hindus, as a rule, are deficient in habits of observation. Lessons on the plants and animals around them would be valuable in several respects. Botany. has several advantages. The British Association, for ‘ scientific training,” considered that experimental physics, elementary chemistry, and botany had “ paramount claims.’ The want of apparatus is the great drawback to the study of the first two branches named. Plants are generally available. Sir John Lubbock has shown how much there is interesting about the habits of ants. Jerdon’s works on Indian Natural History would yield some excellent materials for lessons. 3. Astronomy and Physical Geography.—Dr. Burnell says that ‘‘the Hindus of South India at the present day are completely ruled by astrological superstitions. It is in this way, I think, that the impossibility of understanding the motives of the Hindus is partly to be explained.”* Great mischief is done by the people being guided in their undertakings by ignorant astrologers. The importance of some knowledge of the heavenly bodies will thus be apparent. Simple explanations of natural phenomena would also be of value. 4. Remarkable Inventions—Some account should be given of the telescope and microscope, the steam engine, railroads, the electric telegraph, &c.—inventions which have increased the boundaries of human knowledge or revolutionised means of com- munication. They are all mentioned here, though some belong to another head. 4. AGRICULTURE, The “material progress” of India is one great aim of the British Government. Hvery one sympathising with its poverty-stricken millions will wish to improve their temporal condition. No doubt the difficulties are great, but much might be done in this respect by well-devised measures. Need of Improvement.—The improvement of agriculture ie one of the most pressing duties of Government. About 80 per cent of the *The Academy, Dec. 28. 1878. AGRICULTURE. 49 population depend directly or indirectly upon it for a livelihood. The bulk of the people marry and multiply without any more thought of the future than rabbits in a warren. ‘‘ They are not like the small landowners of France,”’ says Caird, ‘ who are self- restrained, frugal, industrious, and improving cultivators.” In former times the population was kept down by war, pestilence, and famine. The Pax Britannica prevents the ravages of the first; vaccination, hospitals, &c. reduce the mortality from the second ; roads, railways, &c. with the expenditure of millions, alleviate the third. In spite, however, of severe famines the population increased: 12 millions during the last decade: the normal rate is probably much higher. W. R. Robertson Esq., Superintendent of the Government Farms, Madras, remarks :— “A primitive system of husbandry, which sufficed to meet the wants ofa scanty population, when there was plenty of good land available, no longer suffices, now that the demand for human food has become so great, and such a large area of poor soil has to be tilled.’’* Government must interfere. Dr. Hunter justly says, “The principle of laissez faire can, in fact, be safely applied only to self- governing nations. The English in India are now called upon, either to stand by and witness the pitiless overcrowding of masses of hungry human beings, or toaid the people in increasing the food supply to meet their wants.” p. 130. Defects in Native Agriculture and their Remedies.—The Hindu Patriot objects as follows :— “The native cultivators have nothing to learn so far as non-scientific agriculture is concerned, and the adoption of scientific agriculture is wholly beyond their means.” This idea is so prevalent that it deserves to be noticed. A. O. Hume, Esq. in his interesting pamphlet, Agricultural Reform in India, gives the ryot credit for many excellent quali- ties. Though this is willingly conceded, the Native system of agriculture has several defects which might be remedied. The Famine Commission Report says :— “The main defects of the Indian system of agriculture consist in ploughing too superficially, in not giving enough manure, and in the reckless use of water where the cultivator can get it with little labour.” Mr. James Caird, probably the highest agricultural authority in England, says, “The agricultural system, except in the richer and irrigated lands, is to eat or sell every saleable article the land produces, to use the manure of the cattle for fuel, and to return nothing to the soil in any proportion to lee of the Society of Arts, June 10, 1881. 50 SUBJECTS OF INSTRUCTION. that which is taken away...... Crop follows crop without intermission, so that Indian agriculture is becoming simply a process of exhaustion.” Report, p. 8. 1. Superficial ploughing is the first defect noticed by the Famine Commission. ‘I'he native plough does not turn over the soil like the English plough. It simply makes a V-shaped furrow. To remedy this, the ryots cross the land two or three times. An English plough does double the amount of work, while the depth can be regulated. A better plough is a prime neces- sity. When railways were proposed for India, it was thought that the common people had no idea of the value of time, and would not use them. Mr. Robertson has strongly advocated the use of light English and American ploughs. Many have objected on the ground that they are too expensive for the ryots to purchase, and too heavy for their cattle. No doubt this is true in many cases ; but generally “‘ where there’s a will there’s a way.” A light European iron plough costs about Rs. 25. Mr. Robertson has produced a substantial wooden plough, with iron working parts, on the Kuropean model, which can be made in the country for Rs. 10. The Experimental Farm under Mr. Robertson is generally called by the Natives the Plough Farm, from its English ploughs and ploughing matches. It is part of Mr. Robertson’s plans to send out English ploughs to each district with a student from the Agricultural School to explain their working to the assembled ryots. This was done last yearin the Bellary District. ‘The ryots were enthusiastic in praise of the English ploughs, exclaiming ‘ Wah! wah!” From this one district Mr. Robertson has received orders for 350 English ploughs at 40 Rs. each! The circumstances, it is true, were favourable. The Revenue Officers took a warm interest in the scheme, and an enterprising Native firm was willing to advance the purchase money to be refunded by the ryots. Still, it shows what may be done. 2. Neglect of Manwre.—In a sanitary as well as in an agricul- tural point of view, the neglect of mght-soil is a great mistake. Mr. Robertson says :— * As nearly the whole of the grain produced on the unirrigated land is consumed by the people of the country, the night-soil should suffice for manuring the greater part of the grain-producing land; but, instead of being used as manure, human excrements are allowed to pollute the neigh- bourhood of every village; near some it is impossible to camp, the effluvia is so abominable. The excreta-saturated soil, after every fall of rain, gives off pestilential miasma, and poisons the air; while, not unfrequently, after rain the drainage-water off the land flows into the village tank, upon which the whole of the villagers have to depend for drinking water.”’* *Journal of the Society of Arts, May 14, 1880. AGRICULTURE. 51 It may be said that the people strongly object to the use of night-soil, but it may be so prepared as to remove the offensive appearance and smell. ‘They should dislike much more the present horrible system. With regard to bones, Mr. A. O. Hume says, “Outside each village is a golgotha, where the bones of all cattle and animals that die whiten and slowly decay in ghastly piles. At present this enormous supply of phosphates is absolutely wasted.” p. 60. Cattle manure, as is well-known, is almost universally used as fuel. This is excused by some as a necessity. Even if the ashes were utilised, which, asa rule, they are not, the liquid manure is entirely lost. Mr. Robertson says that if each ryot were to plant afew fuel treesin his holding, he would obtain a supply of firewood, sufficient for the wants of his household, besides im- proving the climate and affording shelter to stock. The above improvements are within reach of the ryots them- selves. Mr. Hume urges the formation of forest reserves for cattle during the hot season. Sir R. Temple says that “‘Hleven bushels of grain per acre are produced in India as compared with thirty in England.” Dr. Hunter admits that it is not possible at one bound to introduce scientific agriculture; but he thinks sufficient progress might be made to meet the exigencies of the case. According to Mr. Caird, if one bushel an acre could be added to the produce of Indian fields, it would feed 22 millions. Dr. Hunter shows that to meet the increase of population all that is required is to add 14 per cent a year to the produce. Past Government Attempts at Agricultural Improvement. The Famine Commission Report has the following :— “The success which has been obtained by the efforts made by Government to improve Indian agriculture has not been very encouraging; but an account of these efforts is not without interest, although they include a large admixture of failures and mistakes.” The above confession is not surprising. Success in every thing is generally attained through a series of failures,—by the rough teaching of experience. : Proposed Agricultural Department.—Lord Mayo* felt the great im- *Mr. Hume has the following interesting note : Lord Mayo was probably the only Governor-General who has farmed for a livelihood and made a living out of it. When he came of age (he was then Mr. Bourke), his father (whose elder brother Was still living) could not afford to make him any allowance, but rented to him one ef his farms to make what he could ont of it. This Lord Mayo farmed himself. “Many a day,’ he used to say, ‘have I stood the live-long day in the market selling my beasts,’ and made enough out of it to enable him to attend Parlia.- ment regularly from after Easter to the end of the Session. p. 22, 52 SUBJECTS OF INSTRUCTION. portance of an efficient Government Agricultural Department, and sketched a very comprehensive scheme, of which Mr. Hume gives the following abstract:— “The Director-General was to have immediately under him a small staff of experts, and was to keep up only just such an office as was absolutely unavoidable. There was to be as little writing and as much actual work as possible. Directors of Agriculture were to be appointed in each province, also to be aided by experts. They were to work partly through the direct agency of farms and agricultural schools, and partly through the revenue officials of all grades down to the village accountants. The Director-General was to be moving about generally whilst the crops were on the ground. He was to confer personally with all the Provincial Directors and their Governments, go thoroughly with the aid of this staff into all their projects and schemes, make himself fully acquainted with local wants and wishes, and then during the hot season join the Government of India, and lay before it as succinctly as possible all that was desired with his (and his experts’) opinions and recommendations. He was to watch closely all the schemes and experiments carried out by the Provincial Directors, to furnish them with suggestions, information, ‘and advice; to procure for them, if they wished it, chiefly through the Agricultural Societies of Hurope and America, any information, seeds, cattle, sheep, models of implements, &c., that they required; to keep all fully informed through the medium of his journal of what all the rest were doing; and as his experience and practical knowledge increased, and alternate failures and successes gradually indicated these, to lay down the broad lines of the general policy in regard to agricultural matters that the Government should pursue. “In connection with the Provincial Directors were to be model and experimental farms which were to be at the same time agricultural schools of one grade or another, some of the farms being more specially devoted to the improvement of seed by selection, others to the intro- duction and acclimatisation of exotic staples, others to the trial of implements, and mechanical appliances, others to stockbreeding, others to the purposes of tuition, and so on. Mechanical engineers were to be employed in connection with some of these farms and schools, whose special duty it was to be to adapt the results (where implements of all kinds were concerned) of European and American science, to the wants and means of the Indian husbandman. At first the best civil officers available were to be picked out as Directors, and the best available trained European agriculturists were to be got out to direct the schools and farms, and act as advisers to the Director-General and Directors. Continuity was to be secured by making the service one; Directors were to be promoted to Director-General, experts and heads of farms and schools were to be promoted to Directorships. Gradually, as the expert element acquired knowledge of the country, people, and language, the non-expert element of civilians was to be allowed to disappear. There was to be constituted a compact agricultural service in two divisions, the lower and larger one recruited entirely from the Indian schools, the smaller and higher division recruited to a certain extent from the lower, but, at any rate for many years, mainly from home. “ Under the Director-General a Journal of Agriculture was to be issued. A separate and competent editor was to be employed, but the Director- General was to be responsible, and he was to secure for it the aid of all his own and all the Provincial Agricultural Officers. The collection of agricultural statistics was to be the work of the local Directors, but the AGRICULTURE. O68 further tabulation of these statistics, and the preparation from the provin- cial reports of a monthly or fortnightly summary of the prospects and. progress of the crops on the model of those issued by the Bureau at Washington—then, I believe, a new thing—was to be done by the Director- General or his immediate subordinates. The prices in Europe and else- where of important articles of Indian produce in which no trade already existed, were to be carefully enquired into by the Director, and published from time to time, and, if necessary, experimental shipment of articles in which a profitable trade seemed probable, undertaken. As the scheme developed itself, Government revenue officials were to be instructed to use their utmost endeavours to lead the landholders of each district to constitute Agricultural Associations: they were to be urged and encouraged to send some of their relatives to the schools. Exhibitions were to be held, prizes given, and every effort made to give dignity in the eyes of the natives to the pursuit of agricultural science.” pp. 26-29. “ Lord Mayo’s conception,” says Mr. Hume, “‘ was one thing, the sadly modified scheme that, as the result of vehement opposi- tion, he was compelled to accept, another...... He clung, however, to the idea of ultimately making this really a Department of Agriculture, but the Secretary of State did not approve of even this. Revenue, not agriculture, was to be the main object.” All kinds of extraneous labour were thrown upon the Secretary, so that his branch of the public service was called in scorn the Ht cetera Department, while he was denied the men and the means by which alone he could make his influence felt. An account of this fiasco is given by Mr. Hume. A Director-General of Agriculture, as proposed by Lord Mayo, has been appointed by the present Government. It is hoped that this new attempt may be as successful as the former was the reverse. New Staples—The Famine Commission Report says, ‘‘ The most important of the staples the cultivation of which has suc- cessfully been introduced into India are tea, coffee, the Mauritius sugar-cane, New Orleans cotton, cinchona, and potatoes.” Such arecord is encouraging. The value of the tea exported now amounts to three millions sterling a year. Cinchona alone would be an ample return for all the outlay. The Famine Report states, on the other hand, that the attempt to introduce Carolina rice was a failure. Mr. Robertson showed that itis a deep feeder, while Indian rice is a surface feeder. But though unsuitable for the poor soil of the Carnatic, it might succeed under more favourable conditions. ‘This proves the need of Experimental Farms with different soils. Experimental Farms.—These, with one or two exceptions, have all been failures for the reasons given in the Famine Report :— “The defect in these efforts has consisted in the failure to recognise the fact that in order to improve Indian agriculture it is necessary to be thoroughly acquainted with it, and to learn what adaptation is needed to suit modern and more scientific methods and maxims to the Indian staples 54 SUBJECTS OF INSTRUCTION. and climate. In some cases men have been sent out to teach or practise agriculture who were not agriculturists, and too often when they were beginning to learn the elements of the problem before them, the Govern- ment has thrown up the attempt as expensive and a failure.” Great ignorance has prevailed with regard to the objects of Experimental Farms. An erroneous idea, very prevalent, is that they should be remunerative. Who expects Botanic Gardens to be remunerative ? When the Saidapet Experimental Farm was started under Mr. Robertson, “the objects to be kept in view by the department were specified by Government to be as follows :— (1.) To ascertain by experiment, the proper use of rotation in crops in this country. (2.) To introduce the system of root or green crops, in lieu of fallow, without artificial irrigation. (3.) To introduce new crops. (4.) To provide new kinds of seed; and fresh seed for the crops now cultivated. (5.) To make experiments in the use of water for the cultivation of crops now termed “dry” crops, and for raising grasses and other crops to be used as fodder. (6.) To make experiments in the use of lime and other manures, mineral and animal. (7.) To introduce new and improved implements of rural labour. (8.) To improve the working cattle, sheep, horses, and other varieties of live stock in the country. Mr. Robertson has had many difficulties tocontend with. He knows the bitterness of ‘“‘ hope deferred ;” years passed away before the wisdom of his plans could be seen; a quinquennium was required for the consideration of building estimates; all along he has been miserably short-handed. However, he gladly acknowledges that there has been a change for the better—that more has been done for him during the past six months than during the previous five years. The results attained are most encouraging. All interested, should, if practicable, visit the Farm. Those who cannot, will find an interesting account of its history during the first ten years in the Saidapet Experimental Farm Manual and Guide. 3 Mr. Robertson wishes to have in each district a small Ex- perimental Station, under a trained Native agriculturist, for the trial of improved seeds, manures, &c. The Madras Government has frequently imported seed. In the absence of any other agency, it was sent to the collectors, who handed it to their tahsildars, who handed it to their subordinates, who passed it over to some ignorant ryots. The results, in most cases, might be anticipated. It is part of Mr. Robertson’s scheme to have a well-qualified European for every group of districts, somewhat as the Educa- tional Department has School Inspectors. One officer might AGRICULTURE. 455) superintend agriculture in the Northern Circars, containing the deltas of the Krishna and Godavari; another might have the dry inland districts. : Model Farms.—These are also required. The Experimental Farms will furnish models to Zemindars who are able to afford the best European appliances ; but ryots would learn most from farms of the average size of theirown. There should be at least one in each district, with its buildings, implements, &c., precise- ly what the ryots could be reasonably expected to imitate. ‘he person in charge should have a good agricultural training; but he should be content to live like a ryot of the better class. Provincial Directors—A Director-General has already been ap- pointed. Provincial Directors and experts are the next require- ment. The Famine Commissioners suggest that the former should at first consist of trained civilians, but only as a temporary measure. Such a system should be adopted only asa last resource. A young civilian may be glad to accept the post of Provincial Director, but he will get out of it as soon as he can for a more lucrative appointment. Thus his services will be lost when they are becoming really valuable. In South India happily no such course is necessary. In 1879 the Supreme Government stated in a Minute :— “In Madras there is a Department, which though not as yet formally recognised as a Department of Agriculture, is practically one, with an efficient and well-qualified Director as its head; but its expansion has hitherto been greatly impeded by various causes, not the least of which has been the want of funds.” Gazette of India, 4 Feb. 1879. It would be a graceful recognition of Mr. Robertson’s past services formally to recognise him as Provincial Director. ‘The whole Agricultural Department of the Madras Presidency might then be placed without delay on an efficient footing. Proposed Agricultural Survey. A leading feature of the Famine Commission Report is the stress laid upon obtaining full and reliable information. At one time irrigation works were regarded as the panacea for all the agricultural evils of India. No doubt, in many cases, they have been of much value; but Mr. Hume thus describes the effects of the greatest of them all :— “In Oudh, the Punjab, and the North-West Provinces, the soils mostly contain an appreciable admixture of saline particles. With the construc- tion of high-level canals, the subsoil water level is raised, the surface flooded, the earth yields up its soluble salts to the water, which again , restores them (buton the surface) asit passes awayin vapour. At first the result may be good, and marvellous are the crops that have been raised in the Doab on the first introduction of canal irrigation, owing to the first slender doses of potash and chloride of sodium. 56 SUBJECTS OF INSTRUCTION. “But nature works on blindly and unceasingly. The water below searches out one by one each soluble particle in excess of the particular soil’s capacity of retention, and, as it slowly creeps up by capillary attrac- tion, leaves these ever behind it on the surface. “lime passes on, some crops begin to be unprofitable; in the hottest time of the year, a glimmeras though of a hoar frost overspreads the land. The land grows worse and worse, but ever, night and day, nature works slowly on, and the time comes when, abandoned by the cultivator, the land glitters white and waste as though thickly strewn with crisp, new-fallen snow; never, alas! to melt away, except under the rays of science. “Along the little old Western Jumna Canal, thousands of fields are to be seen thus sterilised. Along the course of the mighty Ganges Canal— a work as it were but of yesterday—the dreary wintry-looking rime is already in many places creeping over the soil. “Come it quickly or come it slowly, the ultimate result here also is certain; and, unless a radical change is effected in existing arrangements, we know, as definitely as we know that the sun will rise to-morrow, that the time must come when some of the richest arable tracts in Northern India will have become howling saline deserts.” pp. 42, 43. The world-renowned Ganges Canal, the supposed glory of India, converting once fruitful fields into ‘‘ howling saline deserts!” Well may the Famine Commissioners emphasize the need of careful inductive experiments. It is cheerfully admitted that much has already been done by the Government of India to collect and diffuse information about the country. Several important Surveys have been instituted ; Museums have been established; District Manuals have been compiled; and Dr. Hunter has recently completed a noble Gazetteer of India. Perhaps the first desideratum is a full and correct account of the indigenous agriculture. It is necessary to know this ac- curately, to retain in it whatever is valuable, and to decide how improvements can best be introduced. The following remarks by Mr. Hume with regard to supersti- tious practices of ryots apply to every part of India. After giving the ryots credit, in many respects, he adds :— “ On the other hand, we must not over-rate their knowledge; it is wholly empirical, and is in many parts of the country, if not everywhere, greatly limited in its application by tradition and superstition. Innumerable quaint couplets, to which a certain reverence is attached, deal with agri- cultural matters. These, in Upper India, at any rate, are true ‘ household words’ amongst all tillers of the soil. These govern their actions to a great extent, and often lead them wrong against their better judgment. They take omens of all kinds to guide their choice of crops and other operations of husbandry, and though some few of the more intelligent only act upon the results of these divinations when they coincide with their own views, the masses are blindly guided by them. ‘So, then, it is not only external disadvantages against which the Indian cultivator has to contend, itis not only that his knowledge is still in the AGRICULTURE. 57 primary experience stage, but that even this knowledge is often rendered of no ayail by the traditions of an immemorial religion of agriculture. “Tt is necessary to realise this (of which few Europeans ever even hear), as it is one great practical difficulty against which agricultural reform in India will have to contend.” pp. 9, 10. In the Appendix to his Pamphlet, Mr. Hume gives examples of the “ quaint couplets’ by which ryots in North India are mainly guided. One or two examples may be given:— From about the 16th to the 29th August is called Mugha. It is con- sidered the most critical time of the year. The couplet runs thus : “ Jo Kahin Mugha burse jul, Sub najon men honge phul. Tf only Mugha give us rain. Every field will teem with grain.” On the other hand, rain at Poorba, from about the 30th August to the llth September, is considered injurious. *‘ Jo kahin Poorba pani dewen, Jinson sub ko keera khawen.” ‘Whenever Poorba brings us rain, In every crop, worms mar the grain.” One is reminded of the couplets by which our own forefathers were guided. It would be interesting and valuable to ascertain whether each Indian vernacular has its couplets. Where they exist, a collection of them might be given in the account of the Agriculture of each Province. Any of value might be retained in an Agricultural Handbook for ryots, and new ones added, in the same style, pointing out the value of manure, &c. Another great department of inquiry would be the results of our attempted agricultural improvements. Much valuable know- ledge would thus be gained. . The Director-General might visit China with great advantage, The conditions are somewhat similar to those in India. Models of Chinese farm arrangements and specimens of agricultural im- plements might be obtained for Indian Museums. If the In- dian ryot could be induced to follow the example of his Mongo- lian brother in the use of manure, an immense step would be gained. The Satthiavartamant contains the following :— “ China is to have an International Exposition next year at Shanghai. There have been 22,000 applications from Huropean and American manu- facturers. It is desired that they should send machinery of all kinds, aes implements, and useful articles, which will be beneficial to ina. Agricultural implement makers in Europe and America might be encouraged to supply cheap, rough, light, yet durable, ploughs, adapted to the wants of India and China. The immense demand, 8 58 SUBJECTS OF INSTRUCTION. - should they ever get into general use, would stimulate manufac- turers to produce them at a low rate. Eventually, of course, they would be made locally. The Director-General might afterwards examine agricultural arrangements in Europe and America, including Agricultural Schools and Colleges. Lastly, he might draw up a Report em- bodying the result of his observations. After discussion with the Provincial Directors, and obtaining the benefit of public criticism, plans might be fully carried out. Agricultural Instruction. The writer may appear to have diverged from the subject of education in the preceding details, but they are intimately connected with it, and necessary to show the great work to be done. Mr. Robertson is strongly of opinion that developing the intelli- gence of the ryot lies at the root of all improvement. Agricultural instruction in ordinary schools is receiving atten- tion at home. The Highland and Agricultural Society of Scot- land lately addressed the Committee of Council on Education, expressing the desire that existed in Scotland to have the teach- ing of agricultural science included in the subjects taught in the Board Schools throughout the rural parishes. The following reply was received :— ' Scotch EpucaTion DEPARTMENT, June 27, 1881. Sir, I have the honour to acknowledge the receipt of your letter of the 23rd instant which I have submitted to their lordships. Iam directed to request that you will inform your Society that my lords are fully alive to the importance of the subject which has been brought under their notice by your letter. They have had under special consideration arrange- ments by which encouragement will, it is believed, be given to the study of the principles of agriculture in the schools under inspection, and they trust that these arrangements, when finally settled, will be found to go far to meet the wishes of the Society.—F. R. SanpForD.” The need of agricultural instruction is far greater in India. It has been objected that “our present system of edncation tends to give the native youth a taste fora town, rather than a country life,”’...‘‘ the very thing which ought not to be done.” Primary Schools. There should be a series of Elementary School- Books for Primary Schools in rural districts. Simple lessons on the planets would do much to break down the belief in astrology which is almost universal. Indirectly it might be assailed by showing that God has given us reason to guide us. There are even native couplets which might be quoted, directly showing its absurdity. Thus one is to the effect AGRICULTURE. 59 that when a man’s house is on fire he does not wait for a pro- pitious hour to try to put it out. A great deal would be gained if the ryot could take an intelligent interest in his work. The Report of the Education Commission in 1861 mentions Mr. Moseley’s views :— “He thought that the labouring classes ought to be educated ‘by teaching them to reason about and understand things connected with their ordinary pursuits.’...He appears to have thought that the scientific principles which lie at the root of most of the common operations of life should be so instilled into their minds as to enable them to understand the reason of these operations, and to take pleasure in studying, criticismg, and improving them as they grew older.” p. 117 Natural phenomena, as wind, rain, lightning; the formation of soil; the growth and structure of plants, would be excellent subjects for lessons. The prevailing defects in Indian agri- culture might be pointed out, with the advantages of an opposite course. Thus the result from spending 25 Rs. on a feast ora gold ornament might be contrasted with that arising from the purchase of a good plough. By means of School-Books information might be diffused regarding plants whose cultivation should be encouraged. The Madras Government has already ordered the Vernacular Text Books to be utilised by making known the best methods of checking the ravages of locusts, sometimes so very destructive. Considering the dense ignorance that prevails and the many millions to be acted upon, progress must be slow; but it would be sure. Middle Class Schools —Mr. Robertson has prepared an excellent little Agricultural Olass Book somewhat in the style of Mac-. millan’s Science Primers. The Madras Director of Public In- struction has recognized Agriculture as one of the alternative subjects of examination. This course might be followed through- out India. Agricultural Colleges and Schools——Hach Presidency should have a well-equipped Agricultural College, where a thorough education might be given, somewhat like that at Cirencester in England. An excellent commencement has been made at Saidapet, near Madras. Some have spoken of its establishment as premature; but facts prove the reverse. Nearly one-third of the students are supported by an Association of Ryots in Gujarat, and landholders ; students have come from Patiala, Ceylon, &c. Tdleness has been the curse of the zemindars of India. Their lands have been given out to ryots too ignorant to make improve- ments. A few of them are beginning to feel that they would promote their own happiness and increase their means, by skilful farming. If they could be induced to take the same interest in 60 SUBJECTS OF INSTRUCTION. their estates which the Prince of Wales and many English gentle- men show in theirs, a great impulse would be given to agricul- ture over the whole country. Agricultural Schools are required in different parts of each Province to give training of a lower grade. ‘They can be con- ducted by students from the Agricultural College. Agricultural Knowledge among Revenue Officers.—Sir Richard Tem- ple says ina Minute on Agricultural Education in the Bombay Presidency :— ** One effective method of diffusing a knowledge of agriculture among the landholding classes is to ensure that our native Revenue officers and officials shall graduate in this science....Or else it might be ordered that all officers and officials in the land revenue department must go through an agricultural course, the higher grades through the College course, the other grades through the school course. Further, as the system takes root, it will not be difficult to arrange that all headmen and village account- ants shall pass some elementary examination in agriculture.” The Madras Government is now affording facilities to some of its Native Revenue officers for agricultural instruction at Saidapet. Sir Richard Temple has the following general remarks on the subject :— “Instruction in scientific agriculture remains to be added to the system of state education...... Whatever steps have been taken in southern and western*® India are but the small beginnings of what ought to be a widely diffused system.” He adds :— “The Natives themselves are awakening to a sense of the importance of improving agriculture, the staple industry of the country, and would will- ingly follow the guidance of the Government in this direction.” pp. 153, 104. Ways and Means. This important point will be noticed, along with Technical Education, under the next head. 5. MANUFACTURES. Sir George Birdwood says, “The Indian workman, from the humblest potter to the most cunning embroiderer in blue and purple, is a true artist, although he seldom rises above the tradi- | tions of his art.” The Mogul emperors maintained in their palaces the best workmen from all parts of India. Painters, weavers, jewellers, lapidaries, &c., vied with each other in the. productions of articles of rare beauty. The magnificent presents made to the Prince of Wales show that the hand of the Indian craftsman has not lost its skill, _ * An Agricultural Class has been attached to the Poona Engineering College, and School Classes have been opened in several parts of the Presidency. MANUFACTURES. 61 There is, however, another side of the picture. The Satthia- vartamani, edited by an American Missionary in the Madras Presidency, thus shows the need of improving both Indian agri- culture and manufactures :— “Time was when a ryot could get along well enough without a know- ledge of the 3 R’s. The bazaar man kept no written accounts, the vil- lage magistrate did not consult his law books; there was no penal code, no registration; but now-a-days every thing goes down in black and white, and a ryot who cannot read the note he signs, or the accountant’s entries on his tax list, runs a great chance of some day finding himself the worse for his ignorance. But having acquired the rudiments of knowledge the boy’s business is with acquiring a serviceable knowledge of some craft by which he can live, and live more comfortably than his forefathers. Our Upper Primary, and Middle Schools do very little to help this forward, though they consume much time and energy in studies of no kind of use to the learner. And the pestilent notion that a boy whose hands have once touched a book must never use them in any handicraft completes the mischief. All this while the whole race of ryots are ploughing their land with crooked sticks, felling timber and cutting fuel and grain with bungling iron axes and pruning knives and reaping hooks, and while the great bulk of the population cook their food in fragile unglazed earthen vessels. Bricks are mere clods of baked clay, and nearly every utensil in use is of the rudest unsatisfactory description. There is hardly an industry on which the people depend for a living which could not be vastly improved to the benefit of the laborer and the consumer by substituting simple European implements and methods of labor, and teaching Hindu boys to use them. It is this that the country is now in need of, far more than of Sanskrit, Latin or Greek, and the town which would teach its artisans to make brick or glazed pottery, or improve the implements of husbandry in the district round about, or induce the general Government to assist it in doing this would deserve the thanks of a whole district.” Ist May, 1881. Need of Manufactures.—The encouragement of manufactures is important on several accounts. One thing which struck Mr. Caird was the number of idle people in India,:— “In no agricultural country that I know of, are so many people to be seen stalking idly about during the hours of labour as in India. The streets and court houses and yards are full of idlers; the roads are never empty, and the railway stations and natives’ railway carriages are crammed with people. Entering a village at any hour of the day you are sur- rounded by idlers. Much of this arises from the absence of other occupation than agriculture.” pp. 8, 9. The Famine Commissioners begin this section of their Report by saying :— “We have elsewhere expressed our opinion that at the root of much of the poverty of the people of India and of the risks to which they are exposed in seasons of scarcity, lies the unfortunate circumstance that agriculture forms almost the sole occupation of the mass of the popula- tion, and that no remedy for present evils can be complete, which does not include the introduction of a diversity of occupations, through which the surplus population may be drawn from agricultural pursuits, and led to find the means of subsistence in manufactures or some such support.” 62 SUBJECTS OF INSTRUCTION. The Commissioners conclude thus by reiterating their opinion :— “To whatever extent it is possible, however, the Government should give assistance to the development of industry in a legitimate manner, and without interfering with the free action of the general trading com- munity, it being recognised that every new opening thus created attracts labour which would otherwise be employed to comparatively little purpose on the land, and thus set up a new barrier against the total prostration of the labour market which in the present condition of the population follows on every severe drought.” p. 176. Encouragement of Manufactures.—The plans proposed by the Com- missioners are as follows :— “In treating of the improvement of agriculture we have indicated how we think the more scientific methods of Hurope may be brought into practical operation in India by help of specially trained experts, and the same general system, may, we believe, be applied with success both to the actual operations of agriculture and to the preparation for the market of the raw agricultural staples of the country. Nor does there appear any reason why action of this sort should stop at agricultural produce, and should not be extended to the manufactures which India now produces on a small scale or in a rude form, and which, with some improvement, might be. expected to find enlarged sales, and could take the place of similar articles now imported from foreign countries. “ Among the articles and processes to which these remarks would apply may be named the manufacture and refining of sugar; the tanning of hides; the manufacture of fabrics of cotton, wool, and silk; the preparation of fibres of other sorts, and of tobacco; the manufacture of paper, pottery, glass, soap, oil, and candles.” p. 176. The foregoing remarks are admirable. It is also acknowledged that they have already been acted upon to some extent. The Commissioners add: “ Some of these arts are already practised with success at Government establishments, such as the tannery at Cawnpore which largely supplies harness for the army.” The recent Resolution of the Government of India that, “in all cases where Indian manufactures can be obtained as good in quality as imported articles and no dearer in price, they shall be sub- stituted for them,” will prove a great encouragement to their production. Proposed Industrial Survey. It has already been stated that a marked feature of the Famine Report is the great stress justly laid upon obtaining full and accurate information before carrying out supposed improvements. If there is any lesson the history of our Indian administration teaches, itis this. ‘l'he worst evils under our rule have arisen from its neglect. In suggesting an Industrial Survey of India as a preliminary to the development of its resources, the writer is simply repeat- ing what has been urged by Dr. Forbes Watson, Reporter on Pais ° MANUFACTURES. 63 the Products of India, than whom there is probably not a living man who is better acquainted with the whole subject. Dr. Watson thus points out the information needed :— “It is intended in the following pages to direct attention, in the first place to the want of a really exhaustive and systematic knowledge of the various products of India in their raw and in their manufactured condition. There are certainly abundant materials for a general superficial knowledge of Indian products, but in order to render such knowledge really useful and applicable to trade and industry, much more precise and comprehensive information is required. Each kind of produce must be accurately de- scribed, the different varieties and species distinguished, the places and the methods of production ascertained, the commercial and industrial value investigated, and the question of supply and utilization discussed. And when all this is accomplished, provision must be made for rendering the knowledge easily accessible and available for immediate reference, not only by Government authorities, but by agriculturalists, manufacturers and men of business generally.” Dr. Watson next shows that this accurate knowledge would promote the influx of European capital :— “ For the last half century it has been on all sides constantly urged, that no radical reform in the agricultural or industrial condition of India can take place without an influx of European capital and European enterprise, and it has often been made a matter of surprise that neither of them has been supplied by England in the amount which could have been utilized by a country of such vast natural resources as India. It has been consid- ered remarkable, that a country under British rule, with full guarantees for the protection of life and property, has not attracted more of the superabundant capital and enterprise of England, although the means of communication have recently been so much extended. ‘The reason is, that however important all the conditions just enumerated may be, there is a still more indispensable requirement which must be satisfied before private capital and skill will come forward without a Government guarantee. This requirement is such a precise knowledge of the industrial resources and of the conditions of production of the country as will allow of a reasonable forecast of the success of the enterprise.”’ Why the Government of India should not leave the work to private enterprise is thus shown :— “Such a knowledge of the country, as is here demanded for India, is in Europe the accumulated result of the efforts of many successive genera- tions, the work of legions of pioneers of enterprise, who pushing on from experiment to experiment, and from failure to failure, have revealed to the country by their final success the secret of its resources. “The whole of the advanced portion of Europe is, in consequence of the development of commerce, covered by a network of private agency, the express purpose of which itis to indicate to the consumer the best sources of supply, and to offer to the producer the best means of realizing his products. A similar organization exists, of course, in India also, but only in a rudi- mentary state and restricted to some principal towns, and to a few of the eeroipel staples, although no doubt it would grow in time by its own efforts.” “To shorten, however, in India, the period of preliminary trials, and unavoidable failures, and to hasten the advancement of the country appears 64 | SUBJECTS OF INSTRUCTION. to be in the power of the Government, which, although unable to take the place of individual enterprise, may promote inquiries which will facilitate its task. Public, as distinguished from private, action, assumes, therefore, in India much larger proportions than it does here, and it will be acknow- ledged that this has always been the admitted policy of the Government of India. Much has already been effected with respect to opening up the country by means of information. The trigonometrical, topographical, revenue, and geological surveys, have been undertaken on a scale of perhaps unprecedented magnitude. It remains to complete them by an industrial survey Which shall take stock of all the various productions of the coun- try—agricultural, forestal, pastoral, and mineral—of manufactures, of the localities of production, of the varieties, qualities, and values of produce, its supply, mode of distribution and consumption.” Dr. Watson further points out the benefits of the Survey in promoting internal commerce, and its political advantages as tending to raise up a middle class. As in the case of agriculture, it is essential to the development of manufactures and commerce, that there should be a highly qualified officer, able to give them his undivided attention. The Government of India is rather that of a continent than of a country. Already Secretaries are overburdened with their own immediate duties, and the work requires a specialist. The at- tempt to carry out the scheme through existing agencies would inevitably lead to a failure as conspicuous as the agricultural fiasco already described. There may be a “penny wise and pound foolish economy.” It was thought a saving not long ago to abolish the office of Minister of Public Works. Everything, of course, depends upon the man, but a thoroughly competent officer might save his salary ten times told. Next toa Director-General of Agriculture, a Minister of Manu- factures and Commerce is required. He should be a man of great abilities, wide experience, and without crochets. Dr. Wat- son is a good type. He should have little office work, but be free to move about the country, inspecting every thing in situ, and consulting all on the spot able to afford information. Civil- ians, officers of the geological survey, merchants, and others, could be turned to valuable account. The Agricultural Survey would fall to its own Department ; the Forestal naturally belongs to that for which Dr. Brandis has done so much. What remains would tax the energies of the ablest man. : The Gold Mining Companies are a proof how readily surplus English capital would flow into India. The Finance Minister has already secured an important move in the direction of rail- way development. It is of the utmost importance that all such encouragements of English commercial enterprise in India should be wisely chosen. Hven one or two initial failures would have a damaging effect. The advice of a competent Minister MANUFACTURES. 65 of Manufactures would be most valuable. Some parts of the country are suitable for the development of one industry ; some of another. Technical Education. The Famine Commissioners have the following remarks on this subject :— “There is no reason to doubt that the action of Government may be of great value in forwarding technical, artistic, and scientific education, in holding out rewards for efforts in this direction, and in forming at con- venient centres museums and collections by which the public taste is formed and information is diffused. The great industrial development of Europe in recent years has doubtless received no small stimulus from such agencies; and the duty of Government in encouraging technical edu- cation is one to which the people of England are yearly becoming more alive, and which it is certain will be more adequately performed in the future. All causes which render such action on the part of Government desirable in Europe apply with greater force to India. Experience how- ever is still wanting even in England as to how such instruction should be given, and for India it will be hardly possible at present to go beyond the training of ordinary workmen in the practice of mechanical or engineer- ing manipulation.” A beginning has already been made in Technical Education. There are several Engineering Colleges and Schools of Art. Some years ago the writer visited the Engineering College at Roorkee in the North-West Provinces. It seemed to be ad- mirably conducted. The Madras School of Arts was commenced by a medical officer, an amateur artist. All along, the artistic branch has been that most cultivated. The last published Report (1879-80) gives the average attendance of studentsas 82 in the Artistic Branch, against 13 in the Industrial Branch. The progress in the latter, however, is said to be satisfactory. The only personal knowledge the writer has of other Schools is from the beautiful drawings of Mr. Kipling of the Punjab. The Famine Commissioners rightly state that ‘‘ Experience is still wanting even in England as to how such (technical) instruc- tion should be given.”” The Atheneum* has the following :— ‘Mr. BerNHARD SamuE son, M.P., proposed some time since to institute an inquiry into the state of the technical schools on the Continent. The London Gazette now announces the formation of a royal commission, and with Mr. Samuelson we find associated Prof. Roscoe, Messrs. P. Magnus, John Slagg, Swire Smith, and Wm. Woodall. The purpose of the com- mission is stated in the Cazette to be ‘to inquire into the instruction of the industrial classes in foreign countries in technical and other subjects... and as to the influence of such instruction.’”’ Sir Alexander Arbuthnot, when Director of Public Instruction, remarked in reference to the Madras School of Arts, “It is no * Sept. 10, 1881. 66 SUBJECTS OF INSTRUCTION. easy matter to determine what manufactures may be most usefully taught in an establishment of this description.” The selection must differ to some extent in different provinces, according to the facilities or demand for each industry. Perhaps a good general rule would be, Begin at the bottom and work wp- ward. ‘Take an average native house and see what articles stand most in need of improvement. Glazed pottery, for example, has been suggested instead of the present earthenware. So with other articles. The goal may be that pointed out by the late Sir Muttu Coomarasawmy of Ceylon at a meeting of the Social Science Congress in England, when ‘‘a Hindu crew, commanded by a Hindu captain, should steam into New York or London in a steamer built by Hindus in Bombay or Calcutta.” Cotton manufactures have already made such an advance that Government may safely leave them to private enterprise. Man- chester will not have any pretext for opposing the measure on this ground. Kach Presidency should have a Technical College, under a well- qualified European Principal. Attached to it there should be two or three European workmen, thoroughly acquainted with special industries. Each District should also have an Industrial School, under Native Management, where instruction of a humbler character might be given. The development of agriculture and manufac- tures will lead to an increased demand for improved imple- ments, &c. The Artistic Branch requires special consideration. Sir George Birdwood says, * We incur a great responsibility in attempting to interfere in the direct art education of a people who already possess the tradition of a system of decoration founded on perfect principles, which they have learned through centuries of practice to apply with unerring truth.”* Some Indian designs of furniture, vessels, ornaments, shawls, &c. are exquisitely beautiful. But Sir George Birdwood makes the following admission :— *“Nowhere does their figure sculpture show the inspiration of true art. They seem to have no feeling for it. Their very gods ‘are distinguished only by their attributes and symbolical monstrosities of body, and never by any expression of individual and personal character.” Should a Minister of Manufactures and Commerce be appoint- ed, it 1s highly desirable that he should make himself acquainted with the best Technical Education in Europe and America before taking up office. He might afterwards examine into the work- ing of the Indian Institutions. * Industrial Arts of India, p. 134. SOCIAL REFORM. 67 Ways and Means. How is the proposed large expenditure on Agricultural and Technical Hducation to be met? will probably be the first question that suggests itself to the Finance Minister, already perplexed to make both ends meet. It is hoped that a satis- factory answer may be given. Government has set apart a Famine Insurance Fund of a million and a half sterling a year. The question is now being discussed, how can it be employed to most advantage ? It is admitted that it will be prudent to devote half of it to clearing off Famine Debt or forming a Fund for future demands. ‘The remaining moiety, according to report, is to be expended on measures calculated to avert famine. Improved Agriculture is the right hand to fight against famine, and developed Manufactures the left. We have spent large sums of money on supposed Famine Protective Works, some very useful, some nearly useless, some perhaps positively injurious. If there is one recommendation the Famine Commissioners make more than another, it is that careful continued investigation should precede every outlay. There is no better protective work against famine than to establish a well-organised Agricultural Department, as sketched by Lord Mayo, including a good system of Agricultural In- struction. It would be at once the noblest memorial of Lord Mayo, and a boon of the greatest value to the country. To it should be added the similar development of Manufactures. The Agricultural Department might be roughly estimated to cost £240,000 a year; the Department of Manufactures and Commerce, £60,000. The combined sum would be one-fifth of the Famine Fund. It would be some years, however, before the full amount could be expended with advantage. Meanwhile the Famine Fund might be accumulating, and works of pressing utility provided to some extent. 6. SocraL REerorm. There is a general tendency to overrate the influence of Govern- ment. Smiles says, ‘‘In all times men have been prone to believe that their happiness and well-being were to be secured by means of institutions rather than by their own conduct.” High prices, dulness of trade, and poverty of every kind, are attributed to Government. The more ignorant suppose that even famines and pestilences are caused by the sins of their rulers—not their own. Government may protect life and pro- perty; but in other respects the welfare of the people depends mainly upon themselves. Everywhere, ‘the hand of the dili- 68 SUBJECTS OF INSTRUCTION. gent maketh rich.” If people will not exercise foresight, if they squander their money on foolish show and borrow at exorbitant interest, they must suffer from poverty. If any of the nobles of a country are spendthrifts and debauchees, they must,in the end, lose their possessions, and be swept from the face of the earth. Dr. Hunter justly remarks, ‘‘The permanent remedies for the poverty of India rest with the people them- selves.” Some of the lessons which should be taught in schools will now be noticed. 1. The Evils of Debt—The Famine Commissioners say :— “No subject has been more strongly and frequently pressed on our | attention than the evils which spring from the degree to which the land- owners are sunk in debt, the asserted rapid increase of their indebted- ness, and the difficulty they find in extricating themselves from such burdens. ‘““We have no reason to believe that the agricultural population of India have at any known period of their history been generally free from debt, although individuals or classes may have fallen into deeper embarrass- ment under the British rule than was common under the Native dynasties which preceded it.” p. 180. The writer doubts whether there has been much increase of their indebtedness of late years. Macaulay’s explanation of similar complaints in England applies to India: The evils, he says, are “with scarcely an exception old. That which is new is the intelligence which discerns and the humanity which remedies them.” The late Dr. Carey came out to Bengal about the close of last century, and for several years he was an indigo planter. Warmly interested in the condition of the ryots, he urged the establishment of an Agricultural Society for Bengal. In 1821 he wrote thus in the Quarterly Friend of India :— ‘“‘There may exist circumstances in the habits of a people sufficiently powerful to defeat the most benevolent views of its rulers, and to entail misery where there is every preparation for the enjoyment of happiness. “ Among the numerous causes which contribute to exclude happiness from the natives of India is the wniversal tendency to borrow which per- vades the country....It is scarcely possible to assume a greater contrast than between the honest, upright, English peasant, and the Hindu, dragging out an inglorious existence between debt and disgrace, borrow- ing in one quarter to pay in another, and reluctant to pay in all cases, making no provision for old age, and sitting content beneath the burden of an endless prospect of embarrassment to the last hour of life. «‘This disposition to borrow is not confined to one province, to one town, or to one class of individuals. It pervades the whole country with all the inveteracy of a second nature. «The country is separated into two classes, the borrower and the usurer ; the industrious though exhausted poor, and the fat and flourishing money- lender. SOCIAL REFORM. ' 69 **The withering influence of this system is perhaps more deeply felt by the agriculturalist than by the other members of the community. “An independent husbandman, free from debt, and looking forward with delight to the whole of his little crop as his own, is almost a pheno- menon in the country. Most of them, through the wretched system which now prevails among them, are in debt perhaps for the seed they sow, are supplied with food by their creditors during all the labors of the field, and look forward to the end of the harvest for the payment of a debt, to which at least forty per cent is added, and which through the way in which it is exacted, is often increased to fifty per cent.” ** We have known many instances in which the crops of two succeeding years have been pledged, before a single clod of earth has been turned up, and this not in the case of a solitary farmer, but of the greater part of a district.” Mr. Hume bears similar testimony :— ‘“ Wherever we turn we find agriculturists burdened with debts running on at enormous rates of interest. In some districts, even provinces, the evil is all-absorbing—a whole population of paupers, hopelessly meshed in the webs of usurers.” p. 62. Mr. Hume, however, gives the ryot credit for a desire to pay his debts if he can. The tendency to run into debt is not con- fined to uneducated ryots. The Indian Mirror says, “The Indian ryot is notoriously improvident. But he is not alone in this. It is well known that common sense and prudence leave the Native, whether educated or uneducated, when he has any social cere- monies to perform. On such occasions he is sure to go beyond his means and involve himself.” A newspaper paragraph lately stated that 1300 clerks in the Government Offices of Madras have to make over a portion of their salaries to the Court in satisfaction of their creditors. Though the representation may be exaggerated, there is no doubt that the evil prevails to a large extent among the edu- cated classes. The circumstances of the ryot, it is true, are deeply affec-. ted by droughts, but the poverty of the people generally is owing, in a great measure, to their own want of thrift, and to the reckless and useless expenditure at marriages and funerals. From the joint family system of the Hindus, “there is always somebody to be married or buried; and the scale of expense does not depend upon the share of the individual, asit would in the case of a separation, but upon the magnitude of the joint family fortune.” The Rev. W. Stevenson of Madras, describes as follows a com- mon marriage case :— “A father is about to get his daughter married; his income is Rs. 50 a month, and he has saved nothing; but it is the custom for one in his position to spend Rs. 500. He knows he hasn’t got the means; he must borrow at exorbitant interest, he must puta load of debt on his shoulders, 70 SUBJECTS OF INSTRUCTION. which may grind him down for long years; but what does he do? Does he say honestly—Well, I hav’nt got the money, it is wrong and foolish to burden myself with debt; I'll only spend what I can properly afford, and mind nothing elseP No, he says ‘What can I do, Sir? It’s our custom, and if I don’t spend all this money, my neighbours will put shame on me.’ So he foolishly and cowardly puts his neck under the yoke, rather than face a breath of popular opinion.” The Dnyanodaya thus notices a funeral :— “Recently a young Maratha of our acquaintance lost a near relative. He arranged with the want of the village to make a feast for a thousand people at an expense of Rs.200. This young man could hardly have been persuaded to spend two or three rupees for books for himself and family, and thinks a fee of four annas per month for his boy in school - a heavy tax. But the expense of this feast is incurred without a word of complaint. The excuse for this is that custom demands it.” Indiscriminate almsgiving and caste feasts are fruitful sources of evil. One drawback connected with the latter would not have occurred to an Englishman—the loss of shoes! A Brahma Somaj lecturer says, ‘Caste dinners mean deafening uproar, wild and unbounded confusion ; exposure to sun, rain, and cold; caste dinners mean bazar sweetmeats, cold curries, dirty water, and sure indigestion; and last, though not least of all, caste dinners mean an inevitable confusion and loss of shoes! Because when thousands must sit down bare-footed, who can discover and readjust the shoes after they have been piled up into an absolute chaos of disorder ? Sensible men, therefore, avoid caste dinners.” It is singular that this crying evil of India, the tendency to run into debt, has been quite ignored by the compilers of Govern- ment School-Books in English.* The only allusion seems to be a single proverb quoted, among others, in the Madras Fifth Reader, “The borrower is servant to the lender.”” Kach Reader should contain at least one lesson pointing out the advantages of foresight and the evils of debt. It would be well for the University English Selections to contain an excellent essay on the Management of Money by the late Lord Lytton. Thrift, by Smiles, would yield extracts equally valuable. The New Code at home has a Social Heonomy Reading Book. Much more are such lessons required in India. Even arithmetic may be turned to account. Questions may be given showing how rapidly interest at high rates accumulates, and how much a borrower requires to pay. 2. The Value of Savings Banks should be Taught.—The people have hitherto invested their savings in gold and silver ornaments. The amount locked up in this way is immense. From early times India has been called the “‘ grave of the precious metals.”’ * The writer hag not been able to get the vernacular school-books examined on this point. SOCIAL REFORM. 71 During the last fifteen years about 150 millions sterling has been absorbed. This enormous capital, besides being totally unproductive, leads every year to many murders. There are Savings Banks in some of the principal cities, but the masses never heard of them, and even if they did, they are, as a rule, beyond their reach. It is reported that Government is about to establish Post Office Savings Banks, as in England. This will be of great benefit. Information about them might be diffused through School-Books. One lesson in a Social Economy Reading Book is on ‘Penny Banks;” another is ** Every Man his own Pawnbroker.’”’ Similar lessons might be adapted to India. 3. The Advantages of Emigration should be shown. Dr. Huuter Says :— “The poverty of certain parts of India is the direct and inevitable result of the over-population of those parts of India. The mass of the husband- men are living in defiance of economic laws. = EDINBURGH & GLASGOW a R.M. CAMERON S ILLUSTRATED CATALOGUE, 5t AN If you will take a piece of paper, like the one on the board in the picture, one foot square, and divide it into 12 rows of squares, with 12 squares in each row, making 344 pieces of equal size, each piece will contain just one. sguare inch. It will take 9 square feet of paper to cover the surface of the board, which contains a square yard. The grass plot in the door-yard is 30} times as large as the surface of the board, and contains one sguare rod. The field in which you see the sheep is 160 times as large as the grass plot, and contains one acre of Jand, PICTURE TEACHING TO eel in@). Crle WiArE ES. =—§—t—t =) =<) od i A M. CAM. AR. 56 f ag Yunapasouy Fy) * | sopre gi “woxpoysopog te | ‘opm yorrered “Souq sous Eas sandy popm-s00y HY -- HW g Sqn ‘wMpoyRReEy Sp * 2 wospOyMIG “1 rs, 06 sap p = “MaupayEazay, “OY pwradesy of “pequoyy "ve SaT108 UViNHzA Shesione as ay a B 10 ‘QINOLVId = | “praaydg yo wmaensy “G9 | STIONVvaavad caypardg se pnoaKy: "BD nee ke WO FIVELLVIAGV 10 sproaaqdg ayo “YS vasaydermory “CO | OT Pre pr eomSiy ‘eojacsouy pore pemsyerabg on ov maqds “FS } | qone—oynce sopdos my iTe orm eSoepy poiee-osy cy— ay ‘09 ‘SHALHAS GLASGOW QUOT Y "EF | weg syndueuy, TP “S3NI1 worm prowidjeg ye wousuors Tver poye oxye are Tbs pow yorered wpe nuoddo s0q) Jaswq ‘wospg vu Cpaed epyeg orooyayg 40 reyes ay OT paw feeumy seTeaK) Oo (oppee my sppomydg pee rus g Bouryg “1/ 2q0D ‘OP ‘BASTad | "sanos| wpr oy BI ST Pt TT | [jo ‘mokdjog poyywo are wapTe GT | wy) asow way yw warn g—70A) suoqdg oq) | toweg spaSeey, jo (noypeepr a) SE poe eproreky op : pednod are dou | qayqa yay Some y resovererpwnty ‘mere poumy “Og > sautug je mene = | “ot wn tea ‘AL pour 2pP2ap ‘OI ® “amy “19 ek a giltindl “ saereg LE 5, . ‘$aNno0 / * ° % pojsowony “pr be uapuy ic “Oe | * poey-aing “oF Jovy, jworymby yy o cori en: opdouiny | S ao nee ‘STTOMVIEL cB) oun omy ‘Weay eprarerty 20qy0 Jo | Aqopren yoo uv onpy av O204—7"))) 4 iene ‘SANVW Id OB) “ peaoyuyppeng) “BP a7 193m St > prawig seyniueny LP “soy SE Cael . . + ‘BCINVUAd = aed jane, be Ne ‘ = soe 21000 40) En ere, , rt mp HVE C — Jeuaiag poy euaBwaag Shaw “« jerdg -g we O }womsg penotwog paw jroo: wary wares feed “L ioe) a0, ee Gone—soweg Suv 124) n % auton oO cay soma sq) OAUEP TPIGA HOU) *B FB) muwig sogro Lows are 910q1— 704 PAIND 'G oO i | * arm — aapoas “HP onky “ ht a | ~ — promensg “9P | momoH & | om ya < eS? ‘oury sejpowpaodsag *] A aml n~ fp) 3 io) 4a EDINBURGH & op wo8e20q 6c | 6 ‘wSs00N ‘ee | “ @ ‘udimeg “Le | * _ ‘aofiwdogy ‘pe | “ 9 ‘woiexoy oF | ‘yop g ‘aolmGIg FE ‘BHODATIOR =| eH 78H peerage oq ome Te 31 | Wry 9D SPP wyE og | PUN ‘xmann 7 OT STP OPPS OM |owry ee wUpRUED eA see] ORS) Mounted on Cloth, with Rollers, and Varnished. Size, 26 by 36 inches. SCITOS 9 'SRNVTd “SIO ood para "Ce | ey orm peting:# “req pgyuewesies = | ve ere tuoyer wPpunc: ee Re pas whoupd og yey | “WaseesD 40 IEN| TE | | ” "SHINTULAIY | ee WYHOVIG IvV2idlawoag 2. cody “Of Reduced Facsimile of R. M. Cameron’s GEOMETRICAL CHART, printed 40 afsara-Hag "KG PO LS RM. CAMERON S ILLUSTRATED CATALOGUE, _37 GEOMEDRY SHEETS: Specimen (reduced to one-tenth of original) of R. M. Cameron’s BLACK BOARD DIAGRAM GEOMETRICAL SERIES. 6 kinds, Mounted on strong Boards, and Varnished, Price 7s. 6d. per set. EDINBURGH & GLASGOW R.M. CAMERON'S ILLUSTRATED CATALOGUE, _ FOR CLERKS AND TREASURERS. ' CHARTER BOXES. No, 2, Price £2, tos, Length, 28 inches ; breadth, 16 inches; depth, 12 inches. Other sizes may also be made. | SCHOOL CASH BOX FOR SCHOOL FEES. CASH AND DEED BOXES FOR LAW OFFICES. EDINBURGH & GLASGOW R.M. CAMERON S ILLUSTRATED CATALOG VE, BOARD BOOKS AND FORMS. All the School Board Books and Forms, Registers, etc., are according to Official Regulations, and are amended whenever there is any Official - alteration. FOR CLERKS. 31. Scroll Minute Book, roo pages Fcap. Folio, Ruled and Bound 32. School Board Diary, Foolscap Folio, Ruled and Printed, for time of Meeting, Business, etc., interleaved with Blotting - 33- School Board Invitation to Members. eis Post 8vo, Haare, for Clerks calling Meeting of Board : per 100 34. Note Paper Headings, Engraved : per 100 35. Letter Paper Headings, 4to and Foolscap Folio, Printed per 100 36. mayslo es, with Printed address to Education Department, London, oard of Education, Edinburgh : ; per Ico 37. Scroll Letter Book, Foolscap Faint Folio , 38. Copying Letter Book, with interleaved Index, Paved and Titled 39. Copying Press, 4to, Screw : : 518 ' 40. Do. do., Foolscap Folio oo en 3 41, School Board Minute Book, very ste tata with Title . 11/6 to 42, School Board Minute Book . ; : : 43. Copying Letter Book, very Superior | 44. Compulsory Attendance Form ; s per doz. 45. List of Defaulting Parents and Children, Bention yo, Act . 6 for 45A. List of Defaulters, in a book 200 pp., Half-bound . - : 46. Note Paper Headings, Stamped Relief, with Address - 500 for 47. Envelopes, Stamped Relief, with Address. . 500 for 48. Charter Boxes, for holding Books and Papers of Schisat Board, with Tray for Stationery, and Name of School Board Ditto, ditto, Large Size Milner’s Safes, Cotterill’s, Chubb’s, and others. Prices various; Lists on application, ; 49. Endorsing Starap—Self-Inking and Acting (Engraving extra) 50. Case of Pens, variouskinds, Penholders, and other Stationery Requisites 51. Seal of School Board (Engraving extra) é : 52. Address to Parents, with regard to Compulsory Education . per 100 53. Compulsory Form No, 2, with Schedule for Return . per doz. 54. Record Book of Children whose Fees are paid by Board 55. Questions for Employers with regard to Parents requesting Aid, 12 for 58. General Instructions as to Accounts of School Boards (Board of Education, Form No. 24), with Examples f . each 59. Certificate from School Board for Prosecution of Defaulting Parents, to Procurator-Fiscal, or . ; : ; per doz, 59a. Complaint to Sheriff : : per doz. 60. Principal Census Book, for keeping pertanene Record of Census 60a. Agenda Book for keeping Official 133. Memorandum of Agreement between Pupil and Teaches 134. Notice on Demand for Treasurer to be signed oy Chairman ond Clerk, in a Book . . EDINBURGH & GLASGOW . £0 ooo°9o eo0o0og0 0oO0 0D Or eH O00 0 OFC OTOeO co) 00 © 0010 0 ° ms N- it pest -* NN KF On PUMNti wm Ns = W oo .@) rye Ow ONHOADDAGCGCO AAR oO (2) {@) NAAOAHAO D 59 60 R.M:CAMER ON'S ILLUSTRATED CA TALOGULES FOR CLERKS AND TREASURERS. PATENT FIRE-PROOF SAFES. =~ ——— 7 Prices, with Folding Doors, as Illustration, £18, 1os., £24, 10s., 427, 15s., and upwards. DATE CASES. PE SONE LCL oS BNE NES SSE, THATS Prices £7, 8s., £8, 16s., £11, and upwards. RECS sae wee NEEM ae SA we we. 1 He Re SOOKE COPYING PRESSES. SCREW COPYING PRESSES, 4tosize. Prices, 2!s., 27s. 6d.,- 35s.. and 42s., according to weight and finish. Foolscap Size, 35s. upwards. LEVER COPYING PRESSES, 4to. Prices, 31s. 6d., SLOT ley te Prices, Is., Is. 6d., and 2s. EDINBURGH & GLASGOW 61, 62. *63. 64. 65. ‘66. 67. *68. 70. 7X5 2s Also Ruled and Printed Sheet for EXTRACTS FROM REGISTER OF MORTGAGES, M. CAMERON S ILLUSTRATED CATALOG VE , SCHOOL BOARD BOOKS AND FORMS. FOR TREASURERS. Petty Cash Book, Foolscap Folio, Ruled and Printed 5/, 7/6, and £0 15 Treasurer’s Cash Book, Demy Folio, Best Machine-made Paper, 100 pp., 5/3 200 pp., 7 7/8; 300 pp., r4/3 400 pp. 71 5 and 500 pp. - Balance-Sheet, Demy Trelis. aaled with Paves Gone : Ledger, Demy Folio, Ruled and Printed, Schedule B, 100 pp., sf; ; 200 pp., 7/6 ;-300 pp., 14/3; 400 pp., 17/; and 500 pp. Treasurer’s Abstract Book, Schedule C ; : . 5/ and Notice to Parents of Fees Overdue, 50 in a book ; Assessment Forms. Notice of Assessment . + . per 100 Do. do. Receipt of Assessment . ‘ . per 100 Balance-Sheet, or Account of Income and Expenditure for High Class Public Schools, Schedule G ; : per quire Foolscap Paper, manufactured expressly for School Boards, with Water Mark ‘School Board” R. M. C. 3 per quire Account -of Income and Bapenditare and Liabilities for Year, Schedule D : : : per quire Stock and Stores Account Book * Nos. 63, 68, 71, are for Draft use only. Odginals of the Biles Sheets will be supplied by the Board of Education. REGISTER OF MORTGAGES, price 7/6. to be sent to Public Loan Commissioner, price 6d. FOR OFFICERS. 81. Officer’s Report Book 82. Officer’s Note Book : 83. Census Book, Post 4to, Ruled and Painted for Educational Carisuz : 84. Census Forms, in Sheets : : ‘per doz. 85. Enumerator’s Book, Ruled and Printed for see Enumerators 86. Schedule of Work, ees. by School pes large type, on Board : . 2 for 87. Form of Application for poard Aid ra Feeson eas . 12 for 88. Notice to Parents of rejected applications ‘ 25 for 89. Summons Sheet to appear before Board : : Sei 2 for 90. Notice to Parents of accepted applications . 25 for gt. Register of Proceedings, for Compulsory nendanees eronety bound 92. Notice to Parents and Employers of Children, large Bill. per 100 93. Notice to Employers of Uneducated Children i a i2 {OF COMPULSORY FORMS. 44. Compulsory Attendance Form : ; per doz. 53- Compulsory Form No. 2, with Schedule to return to Board per doz. 59. Certificate from School Board for’ Prosecution of Defauiting Parents to Procurator- Fiscal : . ‘ : per doz. 59a. Complaint to Sheriff : ; : per doz. 89. Summons Sheet to appear before Pond . : per doz. SQA. Do. do. smaller size, 50 bound in a Book, and perforated EDINBURGH & GLASGOW Om Om Om Om bs ah © oj ato) Kote) OF OS OROnOmOmO sO oO 0 - 0 =r 0 0 O ap on ee” en i f onN ms 0 0 0 = HNHondd CcCOoOnNnnn NDADHNDOANAO Non aA OV 9° 61 R.M. CAMERON SSELILOSTRATED CATALOGUE SCHOOL BOARD BOOKS AND FORMS. FOR SCHOOLMASTERS. 101. Schoolmaster’s Account of Fees, weekly, monthly, quarterly, 2/6,5/,and £o 102. Schoolmaster’s Receipt for Fees, in a Book, perforated . 50 for Receipts for Fees may be had specially printed for School Board. 103. Class Registers, with Standards and Instructions from Scotch Code, a complete record of Government Returns, as contained in Form 1X. (Revised Edition):—No. 1, 72 Names, 6d.; No. 2, 108 Names, 1/; No. 3, 144 Names, 1/6; No. 4, 216 Names 103B.. Whitehall Registers Class Registers may be had for any number of Names. 104. Results of Examination Schedule. . : . §0 for 105. Attendance Return . ; Bete fr 106. School Order Form, from Board. for ‘Admbeion of Pupils . 12 for 107. School Log Book, contains Instructions and Tables for Filling up Form No, IX. 300 pp., Index, Paged, 6/6; 500 pp., 7/6; te Lock) 108. List of Irregular and iA Veet Children, Repor to School Hoard: ina Book, perforated . 10g. The Conscience Clause, nie type, ipahied on Boaida : 110. Pupils’ Absence Inquiry Sheet, in a Book, perforated . 50 for 111. Portfolios, for holding Official Correspondence ; . 2/and 112, Education Code for Scotland, Revised 113. School Board Directory and Educational Nese Hock, 114. Pupils’ Attendance Certificate ; P ang ec 115. Time Table Forms, as required by Code, mounted on board, blank, to fill up, for 5 and 8 Classes : é 1/6 and 116, Leave of Absence Sheet : ; ; . 25 for 117. Certificate of Night School Attendance : : - 12-for 118. Register of School Admission and Withdrawal, for 500 names, 3/; 1000, 4/6; 2000, 6/; 3000, 7/6; with Index (5000 and 10,000 may ‘also be had, strongly bound). iter Edition. 119. Notice of Unprepared Lessons : : . 25 for 120. Schedule of Home Lessons, blank, to fill up - - 25 for 121. Circular issued by Education paeceane anent School Registers 122. Register of Summaries : : + On 2/0, Shand 123. Register of Fees, weekly, monthly, or Pere, . 2/6, 5/, and 124. Pupils’ Place Book : 125. Syllabus for Teachers’ Examination, for hres : 126. Report of the Committee of Couneil on Education, with A dpehtie : 127. Standards from the Code, mounted on Board, Large Type, for hanging up in Schoois 128. Pupils’ Admission Sheet, with pa. ER rar Birth, res School and Standard examined in, 50 in a Book, perforated . 1288. Pupils’ Admission Sheet, with Note from last Teacher, 50 ina Book, perforated CERTIFICATES. 130. Certificate Sheet to be signed by H. M. Inspector, per doz. 1/, 2/ and 131. Scholar’s Certificates to be signed by Clerk and Teacher Id. to l 33: Certificate, under Laour Act, to be ence BY H. M. uPedon 50 ina Book, perforated 134. Certificate, under Labour Act, to be signed by Inspector s Apitar So in a Book, perforated . : EDINBURGH & GLASGOW Oo oOo O20 70 Lon OOOO ° oOON =O OnNs7 000 AAWonod ano RWNAAR AG fe) ° R.M. CAMERON'S SCHOOL BOARD BOOKS AND: FORMS. SCHOOL REGISTERS. 103. Class Registers for 72, 108, 144, and 216 names -/6, 1/, 1/6, and £0 Class Register by A. M‘Neil, Glasgow, 72, 108, 144, and 216 names -/6, 1/, 1/6, and o 103B. Whitehall Register 118. Register of Admission and Withdrawal, Son names 3/; 1000, 4/6; 2000, 6/;. 3000. fo) 122. Register of Summaries for 5 years, for 136, en, and “is aiaity, 2/6, s/, & oO 123. Schoolmaster s Register of Fees, weekly, monthly, orquarterly 2/6, 5/& 0 SCHOOL CHEQUE BOOKS. 66. Notice to Parents of Fees Overdue, 50 in a Book, perforated LO 102. Schoolmaster’s Receipt for Fees, 50 in a Book, perforated . oaks) 110. Pupils’ Absence Inquiry Sheet, 50 jn a Book, perforated . . . © 128. Pupils’ Admission Sheet, with particulars for Birth, last School, and Standard examined in, 50 in a Book, perforated fe) 128B. Pupils’ Admission Sheet, with Note from last Teacher: 50 in a Book, perforated : o Class Registers may be had. for any number of Names. 132. Note of School Books required by Pupils, so ina Book: See: oO 2-2 ee Viera nV rnhi@: Ne School Board Stutionery Offices. SieeGluUR Se sl RET ED LN-BUR GH. 205 BUCHANAN STREET, GLASGOW. EDINBURGH & GLASGOW ITILUSTRATED CATALOGUE, a lef an an OV fo.) Aan Ov 63 iS! RM. CAMERON ILLUSTRATED CATALOGUE, Ay NP ek Atlases, - - - Blackboards, - - Blackboard Cleaners, - Blackboard Compasses, Bookcase, - . - Bells, School, . Ball Frames, - Chairs, : - Chalk Holders, - Clocks, School, Clock Faces, Cupboard, - : Cubic Foot, - Colour Cubes, - - Combination Toy Sten Copy Books, - Chalk, - - Cosmographical Box, Crayon Papers, - Colour Boxes, - Copying Presses, - Charter Boxes, Certificates, - Desks, Masters’, - Desks, Pupils’, - Drawing Stand, Adiustable Dissected Cards, - Drawing Books, Drawing Papers, - Drawing Boards, Drawing Slates, - Drawing Models, Drawing Sheets, - Drawing Pins, Date Cases, Easels, : - . Educationa] Crime pase of, Exercise Books, - - Examination Paper, Euclid, Diagrams of, . Form and Colour Boxes, - : Geology and Mineral Collections, Gymnastic Apparatus, - Globes, - - - - Geographical Pictures, : Geographical Pictorial Charts, Geometrical Charts, - - Geometry Sheets, > Government Forms, - - - Harmonium and Desk Saciines Hemispheres, - - Inkwell Holders, - - Inkwelis, - - - - Ink Distributor, - - - Infant Educational Apparatus, Sheek of, Ink, - - - Indian Ink, India Rubber, 3 Ut 17, ee 22 58 40, 49, EDINBURGH | Slates, large, Framed, | Spelling Stick, - PAGE Illustrations, Natural History, 51, 52, 53 _ Illustrations, Natural Philosophy, Kindergarten Toys, - - Lesson Stands, - - - Loose Letters with Tablet, - Level Apparatus Po Teaching Metric System, 19, 20, - = - 9 | Map Hooks, - z Masters’ Desks, - - 8, 9 Mistress’ Tables, -' = Mechanical nove Working Mo- dels of, - Medals, “ - Maps, School Wall, Mathematical Instruments. - Music, School, - - - Mechanical Powers, Diagrams of, Natural Philosophy, Llustrations of, Objects, Cabinets of, - - - Object Lessons, - Pointers, - - Prayer Desks, - Pen Trays, - + Planes and Solids, Penholders, - - Pens, - - - : Pencils, - - ' Pencil Cases, - ' Portfolios, - - - _ Port Crayons, - - | Physiological Models, - Physiological Diagrams, ° | Pulley Blackboard, - Reading Stands, - - | Reading, Panoramic Apparatus for Teaching, - : : S Reading Sheets, - - Rulers, - = 2 Registers, - - Stools, Masters’, - on Stands Stereometry, : Slates, - . Slate Corners, Slate Pencil, ° Slate Pencil Holders, Sponges, - : Sketch Blocks, - Set Square, - Stumps, - - School Board Forms, Safes, - - Tellurium, - - T Squares, - Umbrella Stand, Weights and Measures: Writing Sheets, - & GLASGOW R. M. CAMERON'S CATALOGUE eer OOr bOO KS: ALGEBRAS. Bridge’s Algebra.,... re vee Cassell’s Elements of Algebra, AY Chambers’ Standard Algebra, 88 pages, ‘cloth limp, .. eee Do. Part I. Standard Algebra, for Standard IV., 24 pages, sewed, Do. Part II. Standard ahaa for Standards V. & VI., 24 Bee Do. Part IIT., 40 pages, Do. Answers to the above, Do. Algebra, Theoretical and Practical, 432 pages, Do. Key to Algebra, 228 pages, ... Do. Exercises and Problems in Algebra, with Answers, Do. Exercises and Problems in Algebra, without Answers, fe Colenso’s Elements of Algebra, Part L., ? Do. Key to Elements of Algebra, Part 1; Do. Elements of Algebra, Part II., A Do. Key to Elements of Algebra, Part Li Do. Elements of Algebra, adapted for the use of National and Adult Schools, ... oe F Do. Key to do. “do. do. Collins’ Elements of Algebra, by J. Loudon, 3 M.A., copra siete Svo, Kelland’s Algebra, Nelson’s Elementary Algebra, Book Ts Do. do. ‘do. Book ie Smith’s (J. Hamblin) Elementary Algebra, oe wit B) Do. do. do. do. without Answers, Do. do. A Key to Elementary aioe noe Do. do. Exercises in Algebra, ... Todhunter’s Algebra for Beginners, 18mo, Do. Key to Algebra for Beginners, ... Do. Algebra for School, crown 8vo, ... Do. Key to Algebra for School, crown Grom ARITHMETICS. Chambers’ Arithmetical Primer (Minor Course), embracing the ordinary Rules as far as Simple Interest inclusive, | with numerous Exercises, : woe y s Chambers’ Answers to Arithmetical Primer, a Do. Introduction to Arithmetic, 146 pages, ... Do. Arithmetic, Theoretical and Practical, 288 pages, Do. Key to Arithmetic, 140 pages, a>] re] a ee eee. me ae eae wNowrontb wre oNOmMmbW oO — NNR oo .at Per Doz. D. 8: Ds 0 9 0 6 1346 0 9 0 3 Zio 8 258 6 4 6 6 6 22 6 6 22516 0 18 0 0 9 0 6 41 0 0 0 64 0 .V) 6 IBS fo 6 22.585 6 22)+.6 6 68 0 3 OTS 0 9 0 0 PETA 6 22 6 0 6 22006 6 22 6 6 6 68 0 6 13 1 13 1 0 9 0 0 18350 0 R. M. CAMERON, EDINBURGH AND GLASGOW. ARITHMETIC S—Continued. Chambers’ Arithmetical Exercises for all classes of Schools, by John Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. S. Mackay, M.A., Mathematical Master in the Edinburgh Academy. Part I.—The Simple Rules, 694 Exercises, 32 pages, paper, ... oon do. do do. cloth, Part II.—Compound Rules Deeriitic 79 ange eve: 32 pages, paper, do. cloth, “do. Part III.—Compound tole (Weights and Measures), 392 Exercises, 32 pages, paper, ... ois do. do. do. cloth, Part 1V.—Practice, Bills of Parcels, and Tables of Metric Systems, 363 Exercises, 32 pages, paper, .. do. do. do. " cloth, Part V.—Proportion, Vulgar and Decimal Fractions, Metric System, and ‘Exercises, 1008 Exercises, 80 pages, paper, ... os aa. cat dk do. do. do. cloth, The above Five Parts in one volume, limp (containing 3135 Exercises), Answers to Arithmetical Exercises, " Arithmetical Exercises and Answers in one e volume, Colenso’s Arithmetic for the Use of Schools, ... Do. Do. Key to do., by Hunter, ; Shilling Arithmetic for Elementary Schools, do. do. do., with Answers, Collins’ Arithmetic for Higher and Middle Class Schools, by H. Evers, Tika: D., post 8vo, cloth, with are nk Standard Arithmetic, feap. 8vo, : Key to do. des ben aga ary for Standards 5 and BE re sat Key to do. cod Je tsb ‘Arithrnetid for Standard III., Key to do. Ar Lnmetic for Standard IV.., Key to do. Arithttietin for Standards ine ani no ; u a ie Key to do. Standard Table Book, Arithmetical Table Cards, Arithmetical Test Cards, Standards I. I. to VI., Ta packet, z Currie’ S Practical Arithmetic, .., Menson’s Senior Arithmetic, D>. Junior do. re ke ay Melrose’s Concise System of Arithmetic, do. Key to Nelson’ sRoyil Series of Arithmetics :— Do. Do. Do. No. 2B. ey No. 3 B, dee vi No; 4 By S. . No. 5 By ae’ No. 6 B, with Answers,’ Test Cards for Standards I. Gon rt. IV., “eg and VI. with Answers, in packets of 24 Cards, vag Table for Class Drill in Arithmetic, ... (Kennedy’s) Mental Arithmetic for Advanced Classes, Smith’s (Barnard’s) Arithmetic and Algebra, crown 8vo, cloth, Pub. at eae 8 0 13 0 33 0 13 0 2% 0 13 0 25 14 24 0 4 Ofer LO 0 6 1236 4 6 5 0 LO ft oaG nae) 1a Dn On ot Ove 0 2 Wwe OVa3 0}. 6 Oy ZB 0,3 DE 0 03 0 8 ie Ge U 6 OF 6 1-6 2 6 0 13 0 1g 0 14 0 6 OFT 0 8 Ome 10 0 6 10 6 R. M. CAMERON, EDINBURGH AND GLASGOW. Per Doz. 8s. D. Ly hee sal 1 13 By alti te ed 1 1g jpn 330 SPI, 9 0 Laie 41 0 9 13 a aa) CRau 0 9 Lb pre S Lat6 0 9 0) 44 GeO Lo-a(b 4 6 4 6 13 6 1 13 ewes 1 13 4 6 eG 6 0 4 6 SU) 4 °6 96 0 ARITHMETIC S—Continued. Smith’s (Barnard’s) Arithmetic and Hpatn for the Use of daa crown 8vo, Do. Key to do. do. crown 8vo, Do. do. Exercises in Arithmetic, crown 8vo, Sus Do. do. do. with Answers, Do. Shilling Book of Arithmetic, 18mo, cloth, ine Do. do. Part I. , Paper Cover, Dor dow Part ity ee BS Do. do. Part IIL., Dion a) 0: Answers, rf De.: do. Complete, with Answers, “a Key to Shilling Book of Arithmetic, is Svo, cloth, Do. School Class Book of Arithmetic, : Do. Examination Papers in Arithmetic, Do. do. do., with Answers, Do. Key to do., Bri a Do. Teestiss on Arithmetic, .. a Do. AHAAHOOSAHGCAARrE DOC UOAGCAWAS 8. 4] bo bore Oto — ee DD RPODDNOARABE rer Boo 6c CO BOP PCO Dz. = Vong olen) ADOOCAOSAGBSAHGVSCAHGAM| Ss BOOK-KEEPIN G.— Continued. Pub. at Per Doz. 6... ae Chambers’ Questions in Book-keeping, with Answers for Civil Ser- vice and other Examinations, by John Bell, LL.B. 1 6 138 6 Do. Transactions in Business of John Adam and Hamilton & Boyd, paper cover, ... as bss ae 4 6 Do. Farm Book-keeping, by W. Inglis, “sewed, 0 6 4 6 Collins’ Book-keeping, Single and Double Entry, by a; Bryce, feap. 8vo, ‘cloth. she 16 sae Do. Ruled Books for Book- keeping, "Single Entry, Li 928 Do. do. do. Double do. LG = 187 6 Do. Book-keeping, Single and Double Boe if MS Lean, feap. &vo, cloth, : 2.6 22-6 Do. Ruled Books for Set, ay py ass one ove ove 4.6 . 41 EUCLID AND GEOMETRY. Chambers’ Explicit Euclid, dei 2 p16 Ta) Do. do. Books I. and eee in n wrapper, ooo 0 4 3 0 Do. Key to Explicit Euclid, 2 0 Do. Euclid’s Propositions, in Sheets, each, 5. O72 1 6 Do. Plane Geometry (First Six Books of Euclid), 18 See. & Do. Key to Plane Geometry, .. 2°90 Do. Geometrical Chart, with Coloured Diagrams, 40 Dx 28, i in a Sheet, ri - Seb 2°06) 722. 3% Do. do. do., Mounted, 4 6 41 0 Do. do. do. do. and Varnished, 5:64 b0 8 Do. Solid and Spherical Geometry, ... 18. Les Collins’ Euclid on a New Plan, by Bryce and Munn, ‘feap. 8vo, cloth, 2° 6 S2r8 Do. (Burchett’s) Practical and Plane Geometry, cloth, 6 6 59 0 Do. Elementary, Practical, and Plane Geometry, by D. Munn, fcap. 8vo, Ay m8 23 Sulsae Nelson’s Practical Geometry and Exercise Book, Ist Grade, ont 0 6 4 6 Smith’s (J. Hamblin) Elements of Geometry, . ¥ at 3,6 ft 332 0 Todhunter’s Euclid for Colleges and Schools, 18mo, 3 6: 2 3320 Wormell’s Modern Geometry, crown 8vo, iv cS, 2 D118 ea Do. Solutions to Exercises in Modern Geometry, * 2) 6292375 Do. Elementary Course of Plane Geometry, fcap 8vo, 287 pages, 3 OF 2748 Do. Solid Geometry, 2nd edition, feap 8vo, 144 pages, 2B .oVOE a6 Do. Solutions to Exercises in Solid Geometry, 2 6 22 6 DICTIONARIES—ENGLISHE. Beeton’s Universal Dictionary, ... a as os 14 0 126 0 Black’s Etymological Dictionary, 5 6 60 0 Cassell’s (Webster’s) Etymological Dictionary, 3.6, nae Chambers’ Etymological English Dictionary, by Donald, crown 8v0, 4° 0 *36 "6 Do. English Dictionary, by ape 7 Opa ome Do. English Dictionary, ... > (1090S Oe Collins’ Cabinet Dictionary, ... $33 es “oe #E 5 0 45 0 Do. do. do. half-bound, = os gee os 7 5 96S 0 Do. Globe Dictionary, oes : 2) 6 oes Do. Illustrated Pronouncing Dictionary, 32mo, 2 0 6 4 6 Do. do. do. do. 18mo, ... 1 0 9. 0 Do. Library Dictionary, ; one } 10. 6" 3. 860cg Ogilvie’s School Dictionary, ... 5 6 228 “Do. Students’ English Dictionary, (Me Bsr Stormonth’s English Dictionary, 7 6° C898 Webster’s Universal Pronouncing Dictionary, _ 3° 6) “2s R. M. CAMERON, EDINBURGH AND GLASGOW. DICTIONARIES—ENGLISH.— Continued. Pub. at. Per Doz. dy Depp sae Da Webster’s Improved Pronouncing Dictionary, ee res tee 2 OFS G Do. Pocket Dictionary, ase eee awe ae wae bre 0 9 0 FRENCH. Cassell’s Pa tee and English-French, BE eee aa 3 6 32 0 Do. do. re er a3 re t) Gy 26350 Contanseau’s Froach- -English, tas 103 6p MOCO Do. do. Dictionary, abridged, 3 6 32 0 Gasc’s French and English, 4 = ane 465 47.07 edb on 0 Meadow’s French and English, . 5 0 45 0 Mole’s French and English, 4 0 36 0 Nugent’s French and English, Is 6-2 553 46 Do. English and French, at ace 1? Ota ls a6 Do. French- English and English- French Pronouncing Dic- tionary, by Smith, ie ne 3.0% 127.0 Do. French-English and English- French Pronouncing Dic- tionary, by Brown and Martin, as & £0.15, 225.6 Surrenne’s French-English and English-French Dictionary, 7 6 68 0 do. 3 6 32 0 Do. do. do. GERMAN. Black’s German Dictionary, ... i Uae Garr 0 Blakelay and Friedlander’s German Dictionary, ea ee 16 C80 Cassell’s German-English and English-German Dictionary, 3° GW B250 0 Elwell’s English- German and German- ae etuente Goch sD SENG Flugel’s German Dictionary, Ee dee 6, 054080 James’ English German Dictionary, ... eg a ee eae 4150) epowe 0 Kohler’s German Dictionary, 8vo, cloth, sae ae Sy 0i Sea Routledge’s German-English and English- German Dictionary, L SGA Loans Theime’s German Dictionary, : one a oe A! 7240-03080 Do. do. oe MbZ On CLOSE EG Williams’ German-English and English- German Dictionary, s-37 pO O mo oMLO GREEK. Liddell and Scott’s Abridged Greek and oa oes ery Bde G62) 68670 Weale’s Greek-English Lexicon, s vue we OMe sno Do. English-Greek Lexicon, eee sts wee se ase 2 0 18 O LATIN. Ainsworth’s Latin Dictionary, by eed, cloth, ... 5 0 45 0 Cassell’s Latin Dictionary, eas Ss 6 9328 0 Chambers’ Latin-English Dictionary, “ai ee ae 3 §6 32-40 Do. English-Latin, + Gd eed ae B/G S20 Do. Complete, yy a aut Ree 6 0 54 0 Routledge’s Latin Dictionary, cloth, PESO 713946 Do. do. paper, ... LL 9740 Smith’s Smaller Latin- -English, POLO? F6Sas0 Do. do. English- Rete TGA L680 White’s Junior Latin- English, . 77 (6505 68E.0 Do. do. English- Latin, . 5 6 650 0 Do. Complete, ne 12 0 108 0 R. M. CAMERON, EDINBURGH AND GLASGOW. FRENCH BOOKS. Barbauld’s Lecons Pour des Enfants, ... my ae ins Bellenger’s French Conversations, ag cae ae san Caron’s First French Reading Book, ... esd a eee Do. French Grammar, 4 ie baa aie See Do. First French Class-Book, Pa + Se ere aE Chambaud’s Fables Choises,__... a ee ioe Chardanel’s French Exercises for Advanced Pupils, ; Ae: Do. First French Course, +5 Do. Second French Course, : Contanseau’s Guide to French Translation, Do. French Grammar, De Fiva’s Grammaire des Grammaires, De Porquet’s First French Reading Book, des Do. Histoire d’Angleterre, rw? was ess eee Do. Histoire de France, ; oes ea ; Do. Histoire de is aera Do. Le Tressor, _ Sus Ba ee Do. Petit Vocabulary, ove obs ose Gasc’s First French Book, oe > “¥ if) Do. Second French Book, aa oe bea vs cae Do. French Fables, ... ose cos une ave see Do. Le Petit Compagnon, ... ase me “ : Do. La Fontaine’s Fables, ... an Hachette’s French Classics :— Corneille’s Polyencte, see Do. Horace, ... ves Do. Le Cid, Do. Cinna, Moliere’s L’ Avare, ... ne Do. Les Femmes Savantes, ners aay Do. Les Bourgeois Gentilhomme, .. Do. La Malade Imaginaire,... . Do. Le Medecin Malgre Lui, ek Do. Le Misantrophe, ... a paper, Do. Les Precieuses Ridieules, “a f Do, Dareadie. sve aa +e = eee eee ae Racine’s Andromaque, oss ve Do. Britannicus, see ove Do. Esther, see eve see Do. Iphigenie, ... eee oes Do. Phedre, aos ads see Do. les Plaideurs, ... oes Do. Athalie, eee eee eo0e ch | Voltaire’s Merope, ... ove by Do. Zaire, ae ee oan ios Hall’s 1st French Course, oud Ani ass cae asa aah Do. 2nd do. noe ahs hax ee ie 82 oo He bo —_— ee oe "Os SS OS an Bo Soo So SSO oo OCS Cs Oo s eoocooonoonon w | GEOGRAPHIES .— Continued. Dick’s Elementary Geography, ove a cos Douglas’ Text Book of Geography, ... is ‘ Do. do. do. with Maps, Do. Progressive Geography, shi _Do. Introductory Geography, ... Geikie’s Physical Geography, ... ay ok Mackay’s Elements of Geography, ... ove Do. Outlines of do. ies owe Do. Manual of do. oa Do. do. do. Part I., Do. do. do. Part IT., Do. First Steps in Geography, Do. Geography of British Empire, Maxwell’s 1st Lessons in Geography, ... ae Do. Geography of the British peter sta Do. General Geography,... Nelson’s British Islands, %, Do. Geography of Scotland, | Do. do. England, Do. Physical Geography, ... Do. Geography of the Shadi and India, Do. do. and Atl rs soe Page’s Introductory Text Book of Physical Geogre, hy, Do. Advanced Text Book, bit Reid’s (Hugo) First Geography, Do. tae ) Rudiments of Geogr aphy, .. ed Do. Outlines of Sacred Geography, Do. Physical Geography, s Snaith’s Physical Geography Text Books in Science, Skertchley’s Physical Geography, Ae ose Do. do. do. clot S.S.B. A, My First Geography, Do. Outlines of Modern Geography, Do. do. Ancient do., eee rag sep GRAMMARS. Allen & Cornwell’s Grammar for Beginners, ... tes bos Do. English Grammar, eee Armstrong’s Practical Grammar, . Do. Narrative Grammar, : ges Chambers’ Grammatical Primer, Set vee Cobbett’s English Grammar, ... + Do. Grammar, xe ay oF nea Ber “as Collier’s English Grammar, ... wee ie ee Corner’s Play Grammar, sewed, cf Pe ; : Do. oO. ae oe ee sue bse Currie’s Practical School Grammar, ... ses nas Do. Rudimentary Grammar, Curtis’s English Grammar, ot oe Dalgleish’s Grammatical Analysis, ee see es + Do. Outlines of English Grammar, ... ose ose Do. Progressive do. ose eee ose Douglas’ Initiatory English Grammar, ose vee a Do. English Grammar, ean “se se ede Lennie’s Grammar, ve se sas see eee Lewis’s Grammar and History, oe Morell’s Essentials of English Grammar, Do. First Steps in English Grammar, Do. Series of Graduated Exercises, Do. Analysis, oth Do. Grammar and Analysis, “with Exercises, bg ROOM OFP OFF ANF OSDSSCCHr OO CONWR ME WHOOP WN HED NONWNOCTDCKWRFRKFONCOCD ORF HE HOH OOHR HS POWRDODORBDDOCOCAWWEWWORMBDERAORDOCOROORMOS, bol APODP DWDOMARWADDIAIAARARBAOAMBDHAGDIOSO 27 —~ WHO WODOP OC _ ub. at Per Doz. AOWRDOoowoDooooAaAwwowwoonrnawocoooooonocooacys ole POOOTSSAARAD SOA AMARBAIRABWArHDOWOOS R. M. CAMERON, EDINBURGH AND GLASGOW. GRAMMA BRS.— Continued. Pub. at Per Doz. SRE, PE), OE Murby’s Grammar and Analysis, es ate sas os eee 0 9 6.9 0. do. paper, OrG 4 6 Do. Introductory Grammar, : 0 8 2 3 8.8.B.A. Practical Grammar, ... eee 0 9 6 9 Do. Young Child’s Grammar, ... 0 3 2 3 Do. Principles of English Grammar, 0 9 679 HISTORIES. Bartle’s Synopsis of English Bays: ee TL Gr. alee 0 Berkley’s History of Rome, a aes ote ay Or) 4a900 Do. do. do. er Cie ae sn Zo Ov > Lave. Buffon’s Natural History, 5 ose 1 0 are ( En Do. do. do. fcap 8vo, Fags Lin Ge des G Collier’s Advanced Class Book of British Empire 3 On tolee O Do. History of English Literature, & 6 233.0 Do. Outline of General History, ... eee ao 271.0 Do. Great Events of History, : aad 2 6 22 6 Do. History of Rome, bce eee aoe LR As Do. History of Greece, : 144i, 6a". 130y 6 Do. History of England for Junior r Classes, Wy 67 9 Lop.G Do. British History, 240 . 1820 Do. Senior Class Book of British History, 2a 6G". 2286 Do. History of Nineteenth Century, Ly 6. 1ae6 Collins’ History of England for Junior Classes, by Schmitz, ‘fcap 8vo, cloth, eae 24 O else 0 Do. History of Scotland for Junior Classes, feap ‘8v0, cloth, LO 9750 Do. History of Greece, by Schmitz, feap 8vo, cloth, LG te Do. History of Rome, by Schmitz, ‘foap 8vo, cloth, LypOts deo Do. History of India, by Pearce, feap Svo, cloth, L7s6) (Geo Do. History of France, by Menzies, extra feap 8vo, cloth, oe PAs Oh See 0 Do. Landmarks of Modern History, by Dawe, fcap 8vo, cloth, 1.6 «1380 %6 Do. Handbook of English History, by Ridgway, post v2 cloth, flush, One & 9 Do. Lessons from English History for Standards pte? Voi and VI., in Three Parts, each, Ong BiG Do. History for Standard LY Outlines—Scotland, 0 2 1.6 Do. History of Scotland for Fourth Standard, Scotch Code, cloth, 0 6 4 6 Do. History of Great Britain, Standards V. and VI., 0 6 4 6 Do. Old Testament History, by Ivens, fcap 8vo, cloth, . ae 9.0 Do. New Testament History, by Ivens, feap Svo, cloth, JQ) Wen Do. Bible Questions, by ieee, bis ar cloth, ry 1 0 9 0 Lord’s Modern Europe, 56 0 45 0 M‘Kenzie’s History of Scotland, Teg Ole Las Maclear’s Class Book cf Old Testament History, 4 6 41 0 Do. do. New Testament, a6 45786 Do. do. Old Testament, 1 0 o 0 Do. do. New Testament, LO 90 Markham’s History of England, > Og Tee Do. do. France, ... sat se 420 Oi 360. 0 Do. do. Germany, ane 4...) 36 | 0 Markham’s, Mrs., History of England, 3 6 32 0 Milner’s History of England, ace ao 5 0 45 0 Do. History of Bons! me Gee S108 ieee aU Murby’s Analysis of English History, 6 9 0 Do. do. do. cloth, Jot Gas Lane G Do. do. do. with Appendix, ; va toe FL <3 Do. do. do. cloth, ssh ere I 9 15.9 R. M. CAMERON, EDINBURGH AND GLASGOW. 10 HISTORIES.—Continued. Nelson’s Series :— Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Royal History of England, Complete, Royal History of England, Part L., ... Royal History of England, Part IL., Brief History of England, History of Great Britain from the Union to Victoria, Outlines of the History of Great Britain from the Union to Death of George IILI., Outlines of the History of Scotland for Standard Tv. New Code, ... ose Brief History of Scotland, ; Royal School History of Scotland, Date Book of Scottish History, ‘ a Date Book of English History for Junior Classes, Annals of England, Ay Pinnock’s Analysis of Old Testantent it History, Do. Do. do. New Testament do., ... i Short Analysis of Old Testament History, Pryde’s European History, a ms Riddle’s Manual of Scripture History, do. ae Do. Outlines of Smith’ +i Dr Wn., History of Rome, do. Smaller OST rs do. History of Greece, .. do. Smaller History of Greece, do. do. History of England, 4 do. do. Ancient History, ... vee do. do. Scripture History, Spalding’ s History of English penta Students’ Hume, Do. History of France, Do. Gibbon’s Decline and Fall, ... Do. History of Greece (by Dr. W. Smith), Do. Old Testament History, : Do. New Testament History, ... Do. History of Rome, by Dean Liddell, Do. Ancient History, by P. Smith, ° Do. England, by Hallam, m3 see Do. Middle Ages, by Hallam, +7 ost ies vat Tytler’s Elements of General History, a st ry oe LATIN BOOKS. Anthon’s Horace, by Rev. J. Boyd, LL.D., roan, ZEneid of Virgil, by Rev. W. Trollope, M.A., roan, Eclogues and Georgics of Virgil, by J. Nicholls, roan, .. Cesar’s Commentaries, by Rev. G. B. Wheeler, A.M., roan, Cicero’s Orations, by Rev. G. B. Wheeler, A.M., roan, ... Sallust, by Rev. J. Boyd, LL.D., roan, ... Satires ie x, uvenal and Persius, te cf Talboys Wheeler, Toe s (Henry) Firs st Latin Book, do. Second dao. do. Latin Prose Composition, Part fe) do. do. Part rate do. Supplementary Exercises, Ae do. Latin Verse Book, Part I., do. do. Part II., Pub. at Per Doz. 8. Ror D Co ST ST AT ST TT ISTO WWNTW ATTN PDR PRWOCOFrOCSO oS BSPNwmNnmaeor wre, He He HR HE O01 OD . M. CAMERON, EDINBURGH AND GLASGOW. DAAAAAAARAAMBWBWAMAMAAMWAARAMMBOOARAOCHBORK AT (eX) DATAA’D D. bop - AMADOR OS cooconocoo eo coqooocooqceqocoeooa.oocooaoe GO &.0 © oocooaocoo ooocoonoe rt WO OV Nie Il LATIN BOOKS.— Continued. Latin Delectus by Younge, Virgil’s Bucolics and Georgics, eee rah Virgil’ s Aineid, ris a os. Horace’s Odes and Epodes, : Horace’s Satires and Epistles, Sallust Catiline Jugurtha, ie : Terence’s Audria and Heautonimorumenos, Do. Phormio, Adelphi, and Hecyra, ... Do. Ennuchus, he Cicero, Oratio pro Sexto, Roscio Ameronia, Do. de Amicitia, de Senectute and Brutus, Livy, Books I. and Sige Do. Books III. to ae dn d0s4 a TS and MT ; Tibullus, Ovid and Propertius, Selections, .. ant Pub. at Per Doz. 8. D. S. D. Arnold's (Henry) Latin Verse Comporen, 3, 6) e200 Bryce’s Latin Grammar, oe oe Oo 2a G Do. Latin Grammar for Junior Classes, Ay 10) 3 ers Do. First Latin Book, iV Gy 134.6 Do. Second Latin Book, 3 6 382 0 Butler’s Cesar, 0 6 4 6 Chambers’ Cesar, cs 2); 65 22°76 Do. Sallust, ; * day Gt VO ba eb Do. Quintus Curtius, A Sete 200 Do. Ovid, tee ‘ HO 271, 0 Do. Horace, 64 i " OM 205 O Do. Virgil’s Hacolves Boe mA oF (Orn 27D. Do. Vir eil’ s Aineid, Books I. to VL, “iH 34 OPP Slor O Do. Livy ae o, Ort 2i. 0 Do. ete Rudiments, 0 10 te Do. Elementary Latin Grammar, Ae. Or honey 0 Do. Advanced Latin Grammar, A AG oan iG Do. Pheedrus’ Fables, ... ie Py Gh 1S 0CG Church’s Ovid, ... eae ‘se 0 6 4 6 Do. Latin Exercise Book, 0 8 6 0 Do. __Virgil’s Aineid, Book hd 0 8 6 0 Collins’ Latin Rudiments for Standards LV: ive and VI. bs sewed, each, On 2 TOG Edinburgh Academy Latin ee a | Ott POG Freund’s Horace, ... AG 3 6 32 0 Do.9 i) (Virgil, ~ Si Gy ta Frost’s Materials for Latin Prose, ne Zh Or 22056 Jacob’s Latin Reader Book, ... TE Riley 7 M‘Dowell’s Cesar, with Vocabulary, . ee 3, 0 2hi0 Principia Latina, Smith’s, Part L., 3 6, 327.0 DO: do. Part jai 3 5 Or) (san Oe Do. do. Part Il. re ae aaa 3 6 32 0 Do. do. Part Evi if es Ree tele wa SG. ee Lend) Do. don shart) V ssn). . ni oe aes ae S16) oa ay) Students’ Latin Grammar, tad Te tae A GrO ie Dawe) Smith’s, W. B., Inductive Latin Course, 2440 22206 8.S.B.A. Ceesar, es a Paro 5 eG Do. Virgil, with Notes, Se ie Lee Valpy’s Latin Delectus, .. a 2G 22 Wilkin’s Latin Prose Exercises, Be £7 G4 ind Do. Easy Latin Prose Exercises, ... eae 2 6 22 6 Weale’s Educational Series (Selection)—Latin : — Ceesar’s Commentaries on the Gallic Wars, ve ZO 218 Cornelius Nepos, 1 0 9 Ee () i G 2 0 Bist) Ke 6 LG he 6 2.00 Eu6 Teed 2.0 Las 2.6 19° 2 0 co DARMRMSTORCAASGCSCASSSO R. M. CAMEPON, EDINBURGH AND GLASGOW. y 12 LATIN BOOK S—Continued. OXFORD POCKET CLASSICS. pub.at Per Doz. 8. D Cicero—In Catilinam, .. a as i. . Br > Pro Milone, rs ea a a a Pro Lege Manilia and Pro Archia, * rs ae oe De Senectute and de Amicitia, 5: os ar In Ceecilium—Divinatio, : In Verrem Actio Prima, Epistole Selectee, Part I., . Orationes Pep set kes I. and shen : Pro Plancio, he in ain Virgil—The Bucolics, “3 <9 +s oe os The Georgics, .. ; a a The Aneid, Books I. “IiE. Horace—Odes and Epodes, Satires, .. Epistles and Ars Poetica, ; The Notes, aca reed: es cloth, Sallust Jugurtha, .. a. Do. Catiline, .. oe Aristophanes—The Knights, ee The Birds, ee Acharnians, 4 . Czesar—Books I. to IIL., so A Cornelius Nepos, .. . Homer’s Iliad—Books I. to VL, an Pheedrus, oe He ret et et et et et et et 8D et tS ee et et SOSROSOSOROOSOMPSSSOSOSCSSCAAASCSOSOSSCSOY, SOSSMRSTOBOSSORSOSOSOSSSSOAAnsdocoocs;: 9 9 9 9 9 9 13 13 13 9 18 9 18 9 9 18 13 9 9 13 9 9 13 18 9 36 Livy—Books I. to XXIV. OXFORD POCKET CLASSICS, with Short Notes. Sophocle’s Ajax ee ts og oe 4 bis 4 ar ie 16 9 0 Electra, Fe ch s ie ae As ne 1A 040 Cidipus Rex, .s Ae Se, ol ais es peat 0.6 C(idipus Coloneus, .. x oe ee a ss 1 0 o. 0 Antigone, ot oe oe re 's a ale Aap 9 0 Philocteles, .. -s oe . . ; ip 10 5.0 Trachinee, : ee = i Lie 9 0 The Notes, separately, 18mo, cloth, bas : as ai. 0. 97 0 Eschylus’ Prometheus Vinctus, a ae 7 0 9.0 Septem Contra nnenes sh + e aie e 1 0 9 0 Persze, oe ee ee ee oe ee 1.0 9 0 Agamemnon, ee ee oe oe ve oe La 9 0 Choephore, .. oe ee ee ve ve ie 15D 9 0 Eumenides, .. r es a ae es o. 10 9 0 Supplices, .. ; - ox . 44 ie 9 0 The Notes, separately, 18mo, ae oh . oe 34:6; 32°20 Euripides’ Hecuba, ; ve Ay ap of Ltd S240 Medea, + ‘. oe ak ~> ss sa 1 0 9 0 Orestes, os os ai a fe es t L710 $20 Phoenisse, .. oe ae cs os P . Lie 2°50 Hippolytus, .. os oe oe oe “ vs Lan 9. 0 Alcestis, 3 oe i és 1 0 9 0 The Notes, separately, 18mo, olsen * i 4% Si n07) 13a) 6 Bacche, es aie =i 170 9 0 Demosthenes de Corona, ez if ts AY e. 27,0» 18 ae Do. Olynthiac Or: ations, is ‘6 mi Se aa 1 0 9 0 Eischines—In Ctesiphontem, .. a fig oe oe es 2. 0 18Ra8 EAE NS ATOR TS BN a S00 POEL LE I ROB EE a R. M. CAMERON, EDINBURGH AND GLASGOW. GREEK. Young’s Greek Delectus, A me we on Xenophon’ s Anabasis, I., IT., Soul TTT. ad. pi aa Do. do. IV., Ve Vis and Vine ak y re Lucian’s Select Dialogues, if es ni a Homer’s Iliad, I. to VI., vs 5 Do. do. VII. to rad og oe Do. do. XIII. to XVIIL., ; Do. do. XIX. to XXIV., om Do. Odyssey, I. to VI, .. oe Do. do. VII. to XII., Do. do. XIII. to XVIIL., Do. do. XIX. to XXIV. , and Hymns, Plato’s Apology, Crito and 1d Ehsedo, ay oe Herodotus, I. to II., Hi4 ve Do. IIT. to IV, : oe oe Do. V. to VIL, Ai ve mn: Do. VIII. to IX., : zs Sophocles’ Gidipus Rex, .. ve ee Do. Antigone, . : Euripides’ Hecuba and Medea, | Do. Alcestis, ’ Zischylus’ Prometheus Vinctus, MATHEMATICS, MECHANICS, TRIGONOMETRY, &c. Chambers’ Practical Mathematics, 544 pages, 330 Diagrams, Do. Key to Practical Mathematics, Veet Gy Do. Mathematical Tables, Pryde’s Practical Mathematics, : Todhunter’s Integral Calculus, crown 8vo, Do. Plane Trigonometry, crown 8vo, Do. Key to do. Do. Spherical Trigonometry, crown 8vo, Do. Trigonometry for pechenay ae ss Do. Key to do. . ae or Do. Mechanics for Beginners, ae ee Do. Analytical Statics, Do. Theory of Equations, = Do. Natural Philosophy for Beginners, MENSURATION. Chambers’ Exercises on Mensuration, with Solutions, forming Key to Mensuration, by David Munn, E.R.S. E., : Do. Mensuration of Lines, Surfaces, and Volumes, by David Munn, F.B.S.E., High School of Edinburgh, Collins’ Mensuration, by Rev. H. Lewis, foolscap 8vo, cloth, ae MUSIC. Bateman’s 130 Hymns and eae Old Notation, a bs Do. do. do. Tonic Sol-Fa, .. : Hunter’s School Songs for Junior Classes, 1st and ‘ond Series, Do. do. do. Advanced Classes 1st and 2nd Pett Musical Boquet and Treasury, .. ee . an : Musical Times, & Pinnock’s Catechism of Music, F WEALE’S EDUCATIONAL SERIES (SELECTION)— Pub. at Per Doz. Cn ce el Oe NO eo) — — — WTOP ONKFPONS OW te 09 coooocoo R. M. CAMERON, EDINBURGH AND GLASGOW. SORSCSCAMAMRSOSOAMRAAMRMMGCOSB DDAAANMBDARAAORWARWAAD Or Wwomrrere DOE Ol bole 18 Ornwrr Oe 13 SSRSSTAMAMSOCAGMRARMRMAMOSCCSYH Or wonrne- NOIR re tole 14 POETRY. Chambers’ Readings in English Poetry, s > ae o Do. Select Poetry, s oa oe. sf 7 ae Douglas’ Recitations, .. - oe ns as Campbell’ s Pleasures of Hope, ... Coleridge’s Ancient Mariner and other Poems, Cowper’: s John Gilpin and The Task, Book I., Dryden’s (Virgil’s) Aineid, Book II., .. re Do. do. do. Book III, ce an Do. do. do. Book VL, Goldsmith’s Traveller, Deserted Village, and Hermit, Gray’s Odes and Elegy, oy ; Milton’s Paradise Lost, Books if as and Il., Do. * Comus, '. ; ae - Do. Samson Agonistes, x “\s “s i. % oe Do. L’Allegro, Il Penseroso, 7 5 a8 Scott’s Lady of the Lake, in Six Cantos, each, " 7 a Do. do. in One Volume, cloth, .. = ic Do. Marmion, Cantos I. to IV., : ss Do. do. Canto V., oy ay ys As at a Do. do. Canto VL, ry - ok $e es Do. do. in One Volume, cloth, 5a Je 5 Spenser’s Faerie Queen, Book I., cloth, tk Do. do. Cantos I. to VL, sewed, ; Do. do. Cantos VII. to X11 Thomson’s Seasons—Spring, .. : oe ; Do. do. Winter, os oe oe ee Wordsworth’s Excursion, Book Lbs ai , oh * Do. do. Book 12s. rr ey : we READING BOOKS, &c. Pub. at Per Doz BAD, 182.5 9 13 2 —" RN OAaWOWNH OF mM WWE Webbe e SSOSSSCSOKFRFHOCOFMCOOCC OS OOOO CC OHH D.®? WN WNOKHRAOCRWNONNHFRAEN AN RWWNNWAOOYD APAWRPODOOROCOWROAROOROROWWAGDHARS Bell’s Standard Elocutionist, .. oe std ab és as 3.6. “B80 Do. Junior Elocutionist, is om f st dé ik oO hata Do. Ladies’ do. es .% se ik ; 2E6 7 Se) OG Chambers’, W. & R.., Pahlicnous: a Do. | Standard Primer, Part I., oe = OQ). Igy ell og Do. do. do. Part ‘ea < a Gi*3 2.3 Do. First Standard Reading Book, cn a 0 6 4 6 Do. Second Standard Reading Book, se As 6 0 Do. Third Standard Reading "Book. Lag 3°40 Do. Fourth Standard Reading Book, Ly 2 AD ae Do. Select Poetry for Fourth “Standard, 1.0 9 0 Do. Fifth Standard Reading Book, .. 1: 4) 1 ae Do. Short Stories for Fifth “Standard, Ist & ond Series, each, 1030 9 0 Do. Literary Reader for Standard VL, 4 2.60 ake a Do. First Book of Reading, .. . On 1b ‘Lads Do. Second Book of Reading, ds 3 ih 0 3 2.43 Do. Simple Lessons in Reading, ote ae 0 8 6 0 Do. Rudiments of Knowledge, M4 0.8 6 O Do. Lesson Book of Common Things, 0 8 6 0 Do. Elocution, by Graham, .. ry 2 '6) “990108 Do. English Language and Literature, by R. - Chambers, 45 B90 SIG Do. Spelling Book, cloth limp, es 1 0 9 0 Do. do. "Part I., sewed, : oe a 4: Oos1s ke Do: do. Part Ths sewed dle cee on caleeks shes tlie Eee Do. do. Parts ITI. and LV Ne oh i 0 6 4 6 SoS WA take FoI Se ORME ears HL eS STARE ER Ngee CLA eM ETE Tl R. M. CAMERON, EDINBURGH AND GLASGOW. READING BOOKS, &c.—Continued. Chambers’ Readings in English Prose, bs Collins’ do. do. Poetry, o's do. do. Literature, . (Macaulay’s) Essay on Milton, (Bacon’s) Essays, cloth, .. (Addison’s) Criticism on Milton’ 8 Paradise Lost, do. Sir Roger de Coverley, do. Essay on the Imagination, .. Class Book of Science and eneakpest Scientific Reader, Sa mn National Primer, 1st Step, : ue do. do. do. large type, do. do. 2nd Step, do. Reading Sheets (16), each, do. First Reading Book, .. do. Second do. do Third do i do. Fourth do. BS og do. Fifth do. es aS Girls’ Reading Book, do. or in heat Paxts fon Ist, ond, and 3rd Years of Domestic Economy each, Academic Progressive Readers :— First Book, cloth, Second Book, cloth, 4 $e ee ate ae Third Book, cloth, Ae “yt AP Aa oe Fourth Book, cloth, Ne ae we we we Fifth Book, cloth, oe ts ae A A ic Sixth Book for Boys, cloth, .« te ras 9° Sixth Book for Girls, cloth, ee Se Me Sixth Book for Mixed Classes, cloth, ae yh New Code Progressive Readers: — First Primer, paper, 1d., és ze Ag 5 Do.. ' do. :-eloth, 2d., ae de ae ae First Standard, .. “e we ee ea Second Standard, 8vo, cloth, : ae a Third Standard, cloth, ae oa ; A Fourth Standard, cloth, ae ue Ae ee Fifth Standard, cloth, ae ee he ve ée Sixth Standard, cloth, Ae +A “e do. do. do. for Girls, ae ae do. do. do. for Mixed Classes, New Series of Illustrated ee Readers :— First Book, cloth, ae te Second Book, cloth, : Third Book, cloth, ae ein ag a st Fourth Book, cloth, Sc a ve Ne ae Fifth Book, cloth, x op ze =e Fo Sixth Book, loth, ‘ we Scottish School Book Association Boole — i The Child’s First Book, ; ep A Primer, 18mo, my . Pe Second Lessons, 18mo, sewed, a ee we Third Lessons, 18mo, sewed, , : Part II., Manual of English’ Pronunciation, Readings i in Prose and NV Ansa 18mo, cloth, First Collection of Instructive Extracts, Second do. do. 15 Pub. at Per Doz. S 2 2 3 0 1 0 0 0 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 2 1 NRrFRKRKEH rH OCOOCO NONWNrFrFrFHOO So He eH OO Ne Soococe — SOOORDWHHe SCOKCF OC OR DOO Aoromwoeort o> AHAOAGCWMADHWrre GSGAanmrwoosIand a OOwowodc dole es RiH 8. 18 18 32 me bo ped fet feed : WAWODFPONKFOmMANNWHA wt 11 ae Ore He awatrwrrh Nor oO R M. CAMERON, EDINBURGH AND GLASGOW. Sowowcococdy we oS MODTCORABOWwrwodd OMmMwWowocd SOomwowowonr so AHooaswowow tom | SARORwWMO 16 Collins’ Do. READING BOOKS, &c.—Continued. Progressive Series :— My First Book, Illustrated, .. My Second do. do. oe My Third do. do. My Fourth do. do. My First Book, 18mo, .. My Second Book, 18mo, My Third Book, 18mo, My Fourth Book, 18mo, cloth, My Fifth Book, 18mo, cloth, ee My Sixth Book, 12mo, cloth, Progressive Lessons, 12mo, cloth, Advanced Reader, : My First Book, large type, 4to, Constable’ 8 Edcostional Saris: os Cheaper Edition of Constable’s Educational Saris Pachnot Board The Primer, .. First English Reading Book, Second English Reading Book, Third English Reading Book, Fourth English Reading Book, Fifth English Reading Book, Sixth English Reading Book, Seventh English Reading Book, "7 Advanced Reading Book, .. Scientific Reading Book, Literary Class Book, Spelling and Dictation Class Book, dition :— Constable’s Primer, Part I., Do do..« Part it. ae Do. Book I., oh - 5 Do. Book IL., a ve Do. BODK sissy) teas be Do. Book IV., : ¥ af Do) |) Book Vi, oe i s Do. BOOK Wie, 6s is oe Do. Book IIs St oa as Kensington Primer, Part ea oes . Do do. Part IL, a . Do. BooklI, 5a 8 Do. Book IL, Do. Book IIL., Dor ebook TV! ice Do. Book’ Vi... 6% Do. BOOK Viste. Macmillan’s Reading Books :— Do. Primer, 4 A 3 Do. OOK 15s ees ee nr Do. Boom iis as oe i Do. Book III., .. 4 "3 Murby’s Excelsior Series :— Do. do. Primer, Do. do. BooklI., Do. UO. -AbOOR Li; Do. do. Book IIL., Do. do. Book IV., Do. do. Book V., Do. do. Book VI, Pub. at Per Doz. D. 8. el Sl lll el a a a a) BEE DPpPRNHE HEE OOCO rPrOSCOCOOCOCONFRFRFOCOOOCOCOSO >) coco D. lela ti Mina ca! a gE Amt WBOASCRHAKHROBDAKEY — — NOCAHFPNEH HDOKHKROCOOTMDH Wo o> Or HB bo cCoNOCOODKE Ke 8. noe ONWKHAKrKNK OR WHO Hm 8 Oo FS = woDoDoar ww STADCORMWH OHO Do WARDODWDOCOCA0oMD ~ORDOOTOOWDOWNW ~ ¥ AHODORDS SoQOoooacoce oon dd Sie R. M. CAMERON, EDINBURGH AND GLASGOW. READING BOOKS, &c.—Continued. pub. at B, UD. Murby’s Advanced Excelsior Series :— Do} ) Book I... es a es 0 6 Do. Book IL, 0 8 Do. Book III., 0 10 Do. Book IV., tT 3 Do. Book V., a6 Do. Book VI., a 1 9 Nelson’s Royal Readers :— Do. Royal School Primer, . 0 14 Do. Royal Reader, No. [., 0 3 Do. do. Now ii.: Cue Do. do. No. II1., n a. Os Hea Do. do. Nos LyY., i + ce yk 1 6 Do. do. No: Vi; Re Pe Zz 0 Do. do. Nox Vii; m3 2 6 Do. Sequel to Royal Reader: No. 1 0 4 Do: do. No. IL., 9 Do. do. Noo iit, es 3 Do. do. No. IV., bd Do. do. No. V., 2270) Do. Step by Step Series :— Do. School Primer, Part I., + ‘ape Do. do. Part IL, Orit Do. Step by Step, Part I., 0 2 Do. do. Part IT., 0 2 Do. Sequel to Step by Step, 0 4 Do. Young Reader, ee OxE6 Do. New do. No. IV., 0 10 Do. Junior Reader, No. I., Lyte Do. do. No. IL., : oi LAG Do. Senior Reader, .. See as s a an a 2 6 Do. Advanced Reader, ie : ave ie ws ie 2 6 Do. New Class Book of Poetry :— Do. Part I., Junior Division, ae 0 6 Do. ° Part 1m Senior Division, .. ¥ a: an 0 6 Do. Two Parts bound together, .. 43 bs 8 1 0 Do. Shakespeare’s Plays :— 1. Merchant of Venice, 0 38 2. King John, 0 3 3. Richard IL., 0 38 4. Hamlet, 0 4 5. Julius Geesar, 0 4 Do. Milton, with Life, Notes by J. M. Ree ie ae 6 Do. Milton’s Paradise Lost and Paradise Regained, with Notes, by Rev. J. Edmonston, we 270 Do. Scott Reader—Poems by Sir Walter Scott, ‘with N otes, ve 1G Do. The English Word Book, by J. Graham, .. i 0 Do. Word Expositor and Spelling Guide, by George Couttie, ive Do. History of English Literature, by W. ¥. Collier, LL. Da 3 6 R. M. CAMERON, EDINBURGH AND GLASGOW. 17 ~y OCOASKADOA Obs b> bo COW OOACDRDROWWrH CO Hy NROOWNW DAM ADAWARORARVS ie} OoOWwWOo QO oO 18 AIDS TO SCHOOL TEACHING. PICTURE TEACHING FOR THE WALLS OF SCHOOLS. Picture teaching for the walls of Schools has now assumed a Special Department, and while great activity has been employed in every other branch of School Furnishing, the proper arrangement of Educational Pictures for the walls of Schools has received little or no attention. Mr. Cameron has personally visited the Principal Schools in Britain and the Continent, and has undertaken this Department as a special study. OPENING OF SCHOOLS. No department of a School requires more care paid to its adornment than the Infant Department, because in other departments the Teacher depends more upon his Black- board and Books to secure the attention of the Pupils, while in this department the child is only attracted by what can interest the eye. ‘The truth of this is known and appreciated, and our more successful Schools are to be found with the Infant Depart- ment made particularly attractive; so that when a child enters School for the first time it is not with a feeling of repugnance, but that of wonder and satisfaction as the eye falls upon the wall adorned with ILLUSTRATIONS FOR SCHOOLS, showing beautiful pictures of Animals, Birds, and Fishes, not exhibited on a sheet of cardboard with a meaningless background, but represented amid their home surround- ings, with all their native beauty and attractiveness. These Ilustrations are presently sold for £3 the complete set of Animals and Birds, embracing 10 beautifully mounted maps on cloth and rollers, and a Handbook by Dr. Andrew Wilson, of Edinburgh, the eminent naturalist, is issued gratis to all purchasers of a Set. But in Small Schools, where any difficulty may be experienced in procuring the complete set already referred to, no Mistress could do better than procure three dozen or so of selected specimens from the large number of NATURAL HISTORY PRINTS, published by the Society for Promoting Christian Knowledge, which may be had at Sd. each, mounted on strong board and varnished, and including pictures of the Lion, Tiger, Elephant, &c., with a short description of the Orders, Habits, and Traits of the different animals illustrated. Before entering the more serious and vexed question of Religious Instruction it is well to familiarise the child with scenes descriptive of some of the most interesting of Bible subjects, for which the SCRIPTURE PRINTS, published by the society already referred to, afford beautiful illustrations, in a series embracing twelve Large Cards, mounted on strong boards, which may be had for 15s. These Cards give a variety to the School-room, and afford a relief to the eye. But, leaving the beautifying of the walls of the School-room, and satisfied that the Teacher has fully entered into its importance, we will now turn to the first stage of the child’s real school work, and for this purpose nothing can be better than a BOX OF FORM AND COLOUR, which, besides containing all the various Forms and Colours, and the means of teaching and testing the Child’s efficiency, contains the Alphabet ona sheet and the Letters on cardboard, and also Figures, so that the child, after being taught the alphabet from the Sheet, is tested by means of separate Letters on the Cardboard. The separate Letters also enable the child to perform the first operation of word building. The complete box can be procured for lds. 6d., although containing such a variety of Infant School Apparatus. The Box contains all the requisites necessary for amusing and teaching the child until fit for being taught to read words of two letter and upwards. ee esa eae Mae eR is es Ce eR A aA BS R. M. CAMERON, EDINBURGH AND GLASGOW. 19 ELAGCH EY PE’S NATURAL HISTORY PICTURES. Tuts SERIES consists of Five Sections, in each of which are Ten Subjects. The name of each subject is given in FIvE LANGUAGES, viz., English, German, French, [talian, and Spanish. SECTION 1, Wolf and Fox, Bear, Hyena, Sea Bear, Tiger, Cat, Dog, Monkey, Otter, and Badger. SECTION 2. Camel, Reindeer, Stag, Goat, Sheep, Cow, Hare, Beaver, Chamois, Giraffe. SECTION 3. Seal, Kangaroo, Elephant, Rhinoceros, Ass, Horse, Hippopotamus, Wild Boar, Pig, Whale. SECTION 4. Penguin and Pelican, Goose and Duck, Swan and Heron, Ostrich, Turkeys, Cock and Hen, Sparrow and Swallow, Parrot, Owl, Eagle. SECTION 5. Humming Bird, Silk Worm, Bee and Dragon Fly, Oyster and Mussel, Bat, Sloth and Squirrel, Spider and Scorpion, Craw-fish, Leech and Earth-worm, Carp and Eel, Viper, Lizard, Turtle and Frog, Peacock. Size of each Illustration, 20x15, mounted on Bourds and Varnshed. PRICE. Per Set of Five Sections £2 LOO: Per Section, ~~ ~ ~ ~ ©: l2un6, This Set is adopted by the Glasgow School Board, and can be highly recommended. R. M. CAMERON, EDINBURGH AND GLASGOW. 40 WITH DESCRIPTIONS. Each Print, Coloured, Mounted on Millboard, ... .. de alld ata and Varnished, ... The Prints, 210 Complete in One Volume, Half-Morocco, C Gilt Edges — Not Coloured, #2 Do. do. Do. do. Coloured, 1 Bat 51 Starling 2 Rhinoceros 52 Ostrich 3 Hyena 53 Heron 4 Lion 54 Swan 5 Tiger 55 Turtle 6 Leopard 56 Frog 7 Brown Bear 57 Viper 8 Hedgehog 58 Cod Fish 9 Beaver 59 Flying Fish 10 Squirrel 60 Lobster 11 Llama 61 Pike 12 Deer 62 Jackal 13 Giraffe 63 Guinea Pig 14 Goat 64 Herring 15 Bison 65 Wild Boar 16 Ass 66 American Tapir 17 Hippopotamus 18 Harpy Eagle 19 Owl 20 Peacock 21 Cassowary 22 Emeu 23 White Stork 24 Woodcock 25 Toad 26 Crocodile 27 Common Snake 28 Salmon 29 Sturgeon 30 Mackerel 31 Elephant 32 Seal 33 Shepherd’s Dog 34 Newfoundland Dog 35 Fox 36 Jaguar 37 Cat 88 Mole 39 Porcupine 40 Mouse 41 Rabbit 42 Chinchilla 43 Camel (Dromedary) 44 Reindeer 45 Nyl-Ghau 46 Sheep 47 Cow 48 Race Horse 49 Zebra 50 Kite sc a ee a eg 67 Kangaroo 68 Walrus 69 Dolphin 70 White Bear 71 Condor 72 Lizard 73 Pelican 74 Scarlet Ibis 75 Cart Horse 76 Swallow 77 Sparrow 78 White Shark 79 Kel 80 Fin Whale or Rorqual 81 Raven 82 Magpie 83 Esquimaux Dog 84 Crab 85 Penguin 86 Elk 87 Perch 88 Badger 89 Common Whale 90 Indian Ox 91 Partridge 92 Wolf 93 Boa Constrictor 94 Nightingale 95 Cock 96 Rattle Snake 97 Hare 98 Common Carp 99 Trout ; 100 Haddock NATURAL HISTORY PRINTS, 2d. 7d. igri | sees SUS eS loth Sides, 8. pb. 8. D. Published at 42 Ofor 32 0 63 Ofor47 6 101 Turtle Dove 102 Skylark 103 Porpoise 104 Peregrine Falcon 105 Golden Eagle 106 Cormorant 107 Quail 108 Redbreasts 109 Syrian Goat 110 Flamingo 111 Rat 112 Sword Fish 113 Duck 114 Turkey 115 Cape Buffalo 116 Goose 117 Jerboa 118 Grey Parrot 119 Roebuck 120 Weasel 121 Gnu : 122 Goldfinch 123 Monkey 124 Common Hen 125 Lapwing 126 Bull 127 Duck-billed Platypus 128 Turbot 129 Hog 130 Otter 131 Ant-Eater 132 Bittern 133 Gull 134 Alexandrine Paroquet 135 Great Snowy Owl 136 Kingfisher 137 Orang-Outang 138 Sloth 139 Blind Worm 140 Black Grouse 141 Cuttle Fish 142 Armadillo 143 Great Bustard 144 Plover 145 Ibex 146 Scorpion and Locust 147 Pheasant 148 Viginian Opossum 149 Shrew 150 White-fronted Lemur R. M. CAMERON, EDINBURGH AND GLASGOW. 21 NATURAL HISTORY PRINTS—Continued. 151 Rocky Mountain Flying 171 Great Auk 191 Albatross Squirrel i172 Common bordered 192 Apteryx 152 Cuckoo Tortoise 193 Petrel 153 Mandril 173 Pinna 194 Wren 154 Egyptian Vulture 174 Butterfly & Dragonfly} 195 Bees and Wasps 155 Dorcas Gazelle 156 Blue and Yellow Macaw 175 Coot 176 Skate 196 Chamelon 197 Pilchard — 198 Anemones 199 Flesh Fly 200 Moths 201 Stickleback 202 Spiders 203 Kestrel 177 Starfish & Sea Urchin 178 Leeches 179 Caterpillar & Beetle 180 Madepores & Corals 181 Alligator 182 Bactrian Camel 157 Oyster 158 Humming Birds 159 Long-tailed Titmouse 160 Manatee 161 Egyptian Cobra 162 Vampire Bat 163 Manis 183 St. Bernard Dog 204 Rook 164 Chamois 184 Musk Ox 205 Gnats 165 Thrush 185 Puma 206 Water Newt 166 Night Jar 186 Mule 207 Canaries 167 Birds of Paradise 187 Gorilla 208 Shrimp 168 Woodpecker 188 Crested Cockatoo 209 Shell Fish 169 Water Rat 189 Spider Monkey 210 Snails 170 Eared Grebe 190 Dormouse N.B.—When ordering the above, please give the numbers. NEW METHOD OF TEACHING PHYSIOLOGY. R. M. Cameron begs to submit to the notice of Teachers a new method of Teaching Physiology, and would draw their attention to the special advantages the model now offered has over those hitherto used in Schools. The subject selected is a Rabbit, carefully and neatly modelled by a competent medical gentleman; the internal parts being coloured to correspond entirely with the original. The various parts are like- wise detached, and so constructed that a minute inspection of the organism of the animal may be made. The special adaptability of this animal as a model will be apparent. Every child is familiarised with the dissecting of a rabbit, from the frequency with which the process is carried out in the kitchen, and, therefore, looks upon the sight with indifference, and not with that sense of repugnance which must certainly result from the dissecting of other animals. Another commendable feature in this model is the curiosity its study engenders in the young, in pointing out to their parents, when at table, the various parts and construction of the animal. In this way children are encouraged in their study, and parents enabled to judge of the progress they are making at school. Teaching Physiology by this method has received the imprimatur of Dr. M‘Ken- drick, Professor of Physiology in the University of Glasgow, who has examined the model, and suggested improvements, which have been carried into effect. Mr. Cameron has every confidence in commending this model to Teachers, who may rely upon its being highly adapted to the purpose for which it has been specially made. He has no doubt that it will yet become an indispensable feature in complet- ing the necessary School apparatus. THE “RABBIT MODEL,” Enclosed in a neat Box, having a Glass Cover, can be had for 30s. MODEL OF THE HUMAN CHEST. Papier Maché Model of the Human Chest. Natural Size, with Lungs, Heart, and other Organs, Movable, Price £4 4s. Smaller Sizes, £2 2s. R. M. CAMERON, EDINBURGH AND GLASGOW. 22 PRL NENG. R. M. CAMERON having laid down New Machinery, and otherwise Greatly Extended this Department of his Business, would direct the attention of Clerks of School Boards and School- Masters to the Peculiar Facilities now possessed for the Rapid and Wecuvate Production of all kinds of Educational Printing. In addition to being Agent for the Publications of the Stationery Department, R. M. Cameron is constantly producing, for the Leading Scotch Boards, NEW FORMS, &c., as they are necessitated by changes in the Code of Regulations and Acts of Parliament, and is thus in a position to guarantee Strict Accuracy of Form and Matter in the production of all School Board Work. Mr. Cameron has machinery and appliances for the Prompt and Effective Production of All Kinds of Printing, from the Largest Posters to School Fee Slips. Minutes of Meetings. | School Prospectuses, Treasurer’s Balances. Admission Slips. General Notices. Fee Forms, &c., &c., Printed to Order, in the Best Style, and at Very Moderate Charges. Estimates given for all kinds of Printing and Bookbinding, le R. M. CAMERON, EDINBURGH AND GLASGOW. Se aAlTIONERY. [N connection with Ins Largely Extended Printing Premises, Mr. CAMERON has also completed arrangements for the producing, in a Derp Supertor Style all Kinds of School Board Stationery. A Considerable Saving being effected by this System of conducting the different branches of a trade in one business, Mr. Cameron can offer the Best Quality of Work at especially Cheap Rates. Day Books. | Letter Books. Cash Books. Minute Books. OO Ce Made Specially to Order, or can be supplied from Stock. In this Ledgers. Department of the Business is also included the manufacture of EXERCISE & DICTATION COPY BOOKS for School Use. A Large Stock is always kept on hand. Teachers are invited to apply for Samples before ordering elsewhere. Exercise Books, with SPECIALLY PRINTED COVERS, are supplied in quantities, without increase of Cost. Mr. CAMERON would direct the special attention of Teachers of Drawing to his New M.S. Drawing Books. ‘The editions at ld. and 2d. have now the Largest Sale in Glasgow. Samples and Quotations for Special Descriptions of Work will be sent on Application. R. M. CAMERON, EDINBURGH AND GLASGOW. 23 24 Necessary School “A tds.” R. M. CAMERON'S NEW Blackboard Cleaner, Price 9d., 1s., and 1s. 6d. R. M. CAMERON'S NEW Blackboard Compasses, ie 1D. 18 inches. 8s. 6d., 48, 6d., and &s. 6d. each. R. M. CAMERON’S NEW Ink Distributor, Price 2s. Gd. each. Rk. M. CAMERON'S NEW Clock Faces. 2s. 6d. and s. each. Rk. M. CAMERON'S NEW Physical Relief Globes, From 30s. ae. R. M. CAMERON’S NEW Physical Relief Atlas, Seven Maps, in strong, handsome Boz, showing Principal Divisions of the World, correctly executed in Relief. Price, com- plete, 15s. hk. M. CAMERON'S NEW Box of Drawing Models, Price £2. R. M. CAMERON'S NEW Terra-Cotta Drawing Models, The Best Series of Vases for Model- Drawing ever issued. Price from 2s. 6d. Rk. M. CAMERON'S NEW “Box of the Magnet,” To Illustrate the Science of Electricity. Price 10s. &e. *,° Particular attention is requested to the SERIES OF MAPS published by STANFORD, of London, and for which Mr. Cameron has been appointed Agent. These are undoubtedly the best Maps published, and as they are considerably larger than any other School Wall Maps, they are also the cheapest. Full Descriptive Lists on application. R. M. CAMERON, EDINBURGH AND GLASGOW, THE DEVELOPMENT LY OF THE TEACHING OF LAW IN THE UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH. BY JOERNG Eee COLDS TRE AM, W.5., LECTURER IN THE UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH ON CIVIL PROCEDURE IN THE LAW COURTS OF SCOTLAND ; EXTRAORDINARY MEMBER, FORMERLY ONE OF THE PRESIDENTS OF THE JURIDICAL SOCIETY OF EDINBURGH. EDINBURGH: PRINTED BY MORRISON & GIBB. 1884. THE following pages formed the subject of my introductory Lecture to the class in the University of Edinburgh of “ Civil Procedure in the Law Courts of Scotland,” delivered in the Public Law Class Room, on 27th October 1884. I now issue the Lecture to the profession in this form, believing that the study of the subject of which it treats will be found as interesting to the reader as it has been to its author. It is right I should acknowledge my obliga-. tions to the learned work of Sir Alexander Grant, Bart., viz., The Story of the University of Edinburgh, for material help in its preparation. ls SPAS. 6 BUCKINGHAM TERRACE, . EDINBURGH, 15th November 1884. THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE TEACHING OF LAW IN THE UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH. ——0— In taking my place for the first’ time as a teacher in the Faculty of Law in the University of Edinburgh, I think it may not be unsuitable if, in my introductory lecture, I give a short account of the history of the teaching of Law in this University ; but before proceeding to this duty, it is perhaps right that I should publicly acknowledge my gratitude for my appointment to the Lecture- ship of Civil Procedure in the Law Courts of Scotland—(1) to the Law Faculty ; (2) to the Senatus of the University; and (3) to its Court, and to express the hope that I may be enabled to realize their expectations in the conduct of the Class. The University of Edinburgh was founded in 1583, but it was not till 1590 that any attempt was made to found a Chair of Law. In that year the sum of £300 a year, as interest upon a capital sum of £3000, was provided by the Town Council of Edinburgh for the maintenance of a “Professor of the Laws.” This sum of £3000 was contributed, as very naturally it should have been, in sums of £1000 by each of—(1) the Lords of Session; (2) the Faculty of Advocates; and (3) the Society of Writers to the Signet, as three separate parties. The Chair thus founded was not occupied, however, by any one who lecttired on Law, for what reason is not clear; and ultimately in 1597, after two appointments, the Chair, even in name, was abandoned, and the endowment for it was otherwise disposed of. It was not again till 1707 that anything was done to promote the teaching of Law in the University. In that year, however, Queen Anne issued an order bearing upon the expediency of 4 establishing and settling “a foundation for a Professorship of the Public Law and the Law of Nature and Nations.” For the endowment of this Chair £150 was obtained by altering the dis- position of a grant of £300 per annum made by King William, and Charles Areskine was appointed Professor. It seems doubtful if Mr. Areskine ever taught his subject, and he is said to have used his salary in studying law at Utrecht. He had a dis- tinguished career at the Scotch Bar, and attained the dignity of Lord Justice-Clerk. Chair of Public From 1734 to 1779, there are four gentlemen named as occupants of this Chair, viz. William Kirkpatrick, George Abercrombie, Hugh Blair, and James Balfour of Pilrig. It seems to have been looked upon as a sinecure by all these gentlemen, little or no work being done in it. The emoluments of the Chair were often more than £300 a year, and it was conferred upon the person who could buy out the holder, the Lord Advocate apparently being privy to the transaction. Thus Abercrombie is said to have paid £1000 for it to Kirkpatrick, while Maconochie, the sixth holder of the Chair, paid Balfour the sum of £1522, 18s. 2d. for it. Maconochie (the first Lord Meadowbank) held the Chair for seventeen years, and though an able man, of discursive knowledge and originality, he could only command a very small class, and he only lectured for two sessions. He was succeeded by Robert Hamilton, a Principal Clerk of Session, who held the Chair for thirty-five years, but never lectured. The class hitherto had been deemed a failure, one cause assigned for this being that the Chair had been held by men rising into and in large practice, who treated their academical position and duties as of minor importance. From 1831 to 1862, the Crown made no appointment to the Chair; but the Commissioners of 1858-62 having “ ordained that the Professor of Public Law shall deliver a course of not less than forty lectures on International Law during the public session of the University 4 yearly, and to the Professorship shall be attached a salary of £250, to be annually voted by Parliament,” a Commission was on 15th May 1862 issued by Queen Victoria in favour of James Lorimer, LL.D., advocate, the present holder of the Chair. At- tendance on his lectures being necessary for the LL.B. degree, as also for admission to the Faculty of Advocates, secures a good class, and no longer can the Chair be considered a failure, which it was held to be fifty years ago. The salary of the Chair is now £400 per annum, £150 of Bishops’ rents having been restored to its emoluments by a recent decision of the Court of Session. 5 As before mentioned, the Chair of Public Law was founded Chair of in 1707, but only in name, as the first and other holders of it seem to have eschewed lecturing; and there being no other University provision for the teaching of Law, it appears to have been the practice of those desiring to qualify themselves as lawyers, both before and after that date, to resort to the Universities of Utrecht, Leyden, Groningen, or Halle for their necessary legal instruction. In 1558, Bishop Reid by his bequest had made provision for a College of Arts and Law, but nothing came of it. It is true that some of the Advocates, towards the close of the seventeenth century, gave legal instruction by lectures in their own houses; and we are told that John Spottiswoode, Advocate, and Keeper of the Advocates’ Library, who had obtained his legal education at Leyden, “had the honour of being the first who opened schools in his own house indeed for teaching professedly the Roman and Scottish Laws, which he continued to teach at Edinburgh, though not in the University for six-and-twenty years.” Another of the extra-mural lecturers was James Craig, who, in 1710, after some years of lecturing extra-murally, was elected by the Town Council Professor of Civil Law in the University ; but at first, and for seven years, no salary was assigned to him. In 1716, however, a salary of £100 per annum was provided by the town out of the Ale and Beer Duties, under the Act 3 Geo. I. cap. 5. Craig continued to lecture till 1732. He was a member of the Riccarton family, and his notes for his lectures are still faithfully preserved in the library of the family seat. Craig was succeeded by Thomas Dundas, a member of the Arniston family, and he appears to have been a jurist of some’ note, as he was known to Continental writers. He resigned the Chair in 1745, and was succeeded by Kenneth M‘Kenzie of the Delvine family. He had been over twenty years at the bar, and had studied at Leyden. Robert Dick was the next occupant of the Chair, having been appointed in 1755; and he held the office till 1796, although in 1792 John Wilde was appointed joint-Professor with him. During Dick’s _ tenure of office, the example of the Chair of Civil Law in Glasgow was followed, and the lectures were given in English—they having formerly been given in Latin. In 1799-1800, Wilde was incapacitated, in the view of the Senatus, from properly dis- charging the duties of the Chair; and on their representing the matter to the Town Council, an arrangement was made between 1 Chalmers’ Life of Ruddiman, 1795, p. 35, Public Law. Chair of Civil Law. Chair o1 History. 6 the Faculty of Advocates and the Town Council, by which Wilde was to draw the salary, but a joint-Professor was appointed to do the work. Alexander Irving succeeded Wilde in 1800, and occupied the Chair till 1826, when he was elevated to the, Bench under the title of Lord Newton. Irving had recommended, in his evidence before the Royal Commission, the abolition of the class in Pandects, which had always been slightly attended, and his successor, Douglas Cheape, who took office in 1827, abolished the class, and gave only one course, viz. that on the Institutes supplemented from the Corpus Juris. Cheape also abolished the oral examinations in Latin. He resigned the Chair in 1842 from feeble health, the Faculty of Advocates recording “their high sense of the very able and efficient manner in which he had disgharged the duties of the Chair.’ Archibald Campbell Swinton of Kimmerghame, who still survives, was the next occupant of the Chair, and he held it till 1862, when he was succeeded by James Muirhead, Sheriff of Chancery, the present Professor. The next Chair to be established in the Faculty of Law was that of ‘“ Universal History.” The Town Council founded it in 1719, assigning a temporary endowment of £50 a year to it. The order of Council making the Professorship may be read, even at this late date of growth of intelligence, with interest and instruction. It is as follows: “Considering the great advantages that arise to the nation from the encouragement of learning by the establish- ment of such Professorships in our College as enable youth to study with equal advantages at home as they do abroad, and considering the advantages that arise to this city in particular from the reputation that the Professors of the liberal Arts and Sciences have justly acquired to themselves in the said College, and that a Profession of Universal History is extremely necessary to complete the same, this Profession being very much esteemed, and the most attended of any one Profession at all the Universities abroad, and yet no where set up at any of our Colleges in Scotland,” etc., they agree “that a Professor of Universal History be established in the College of this city.” Mr. Charles Mackie, Advocate, was the first holder of this office. He was afterwards styled “Professor of Universal Civil History, and Greek and Roman Antiquities.” He devoted part of his course to lecturing upon the “Law Procedure of the Ancients.” The patronage of . the Chair was virtually placed in the hands of the Faculty of Advocates by the Act of 1721, which also provided for the pay- 7 ment of £100 per annum to the holder of the office. The Chair is now known as that of “ Constitutional Law and History.” Charles Mackie occupied the Chair for forty-six years, but for the last twelve years of his tenure he had the assistance of a joint- Professor to teach the class. Mr. John Gordon, and subsequently. Mr. William Wallace, held the office. When Mackie resigned in 1765, John Pringle was appointed Professor; but it is said that for twenty years prior to 1780, the lectures of the Chair had-been discontinued, There is reason to believe that the salary was not regularly paid during this time. In 1780, the teaching of the Chair was resumed by Alexander Fraser Tytler, who in that year was appointed joint-Professor with Pringle. His lectures were afterwards published under the title of Hlements of General History, in which were described “ the condition of society and the progressive state of mankind from «he earliest ages to the beginning of the present.age.” There is evidence to show that in one of his best years only thirty students attended his class. He was raised to the Bench in 1801, under the title of Lord Woodhouselee, and was succeeded in the Chair by his eldest son, William Fraser Tytler. We are told that he also failed to obtain a class of any size, seventeen students only attend- ing his class in 1806-07, and for seven sessions he did not lecture at all. His lectures having been read for him during his last session of tenure by his brother, Patrick Fraser Tytler, the historian of Scotland, he resigned the office in 1821, having previously been appointed Sheriff of Inverness-shire. He was succeeded by Sir William Hamilton, Bart., in 1821. His occu- pancy of the Chair was by no means congenial to him. His limited class of about thirty led him to petition the Senatus to give “protection” to the Chair by admitting the subject to the Arts curriculum; but he was not encouraged in his suit, and he after- wards brought his views before the Royal Commission, stating that in Germany from “twelve to twenty different historical courses are delivered to audiences more numerous than those in almost any other department of knowledge.” The Commissioners, however, recommended the abolition of the Chair. In 1833, the city having become bankrupt, the salary of the Chair ceased to be paid. Sir William gave up lecturing, and in 1836 he was transferred to the Chair of Logic and Metaphysics, which he so much adorned for so many years. He was succeeded in the Chair of History by George Skene, who afterwards became Professor of Law in the University of Glasgow. From 1842 to 1846, the Chair was occupied by James Chair of History. Chair of Scots Law. 8 Frederick Ferrier, and on his election as Professor of Moral Philo- sophy in the University of St. Andrews, Cosmo Innes, Advocate, afterwards Principal Clerk of Session, was appointed. He was a master of History. At first he lectured gratuitously, and so long as he did so, he had a large class. When afterwards he demanded the — usual fee, he is said to have hada mere handful of students. He then lowered his fee, but no one came; and on returning to his original practice of free attendance, his benches were filled. But as his class proved unremunerative, he ceased to lecture. In 1862, however, the University Commissioners made attendance on the lectures of the Chair necessary for the LL.B. degree. They ordained it as the “Chair of History,” and to belong to the Faculty of Law as well as the Faculty of Arts. Innes then resumed his lectures, and he secured a good class till his death in 1874. He was succeeded by Auneas J. G. Mackay, LL.D., Advo- cate, who occupied the Chair till 1881, when he retired owing to the engrossing nature of his official and private practice at the Bar. As the learned author of the most valuable treatise on the Law and Practice of the Court of Session of the present day, he deserves an honoured reference in the introductory remarks of the first occupant of the Lectureship on Civil Procedure in the Law Courts of Scotland. Professor Mackay was succeeded by John Kirkpatrick, LL.B., Advocate, now the energetic Dean of the Faculty of Law. In 1722, the Chair of Scots Law was founded by the Town Council of Edinburgh. This they did upon the petition of Alexander Bayne, Advocate, a gentleman who had previously been lecturing upon the subject outside. He represented to the Town Council “how much it would be for the interest of the nation and of this city to have a Professor of the Law of Scotland placed in the University of this city, not only for the teaching the Scots Law, but also for qualifying of Writers for His Majesty’s Signet ;” and the Council “ being fully apprised of the fitness and qualification of Mr. Alexander Bayne of Rives, Advocate, to discharge such a province, elect him to be Professor of the Law of Scotland in the University of this city.” The salary of £100 was paid out of the Ale Duty. Bayne occupied the Chair till 1737, and is known as the author of Institutions of the Criminal Law of Scotland, and another book on Municipal Law. He was succeeded by John Erskine, who as an enthusiastic teacher of the subject had a larger class than Bayne. Like his predecessor, he used Sir George Mackenzie’s Institutions as his text-book, till the publication of his own Principles of the Law of Scotland in 1754, which thereafter 9 was the basis for his lectures. Erskine occupied the Chair for twenty-eight years, when he resigned. He died in 1773, after employing the last years of his life in the completion of The Institutes of the Law of Scotland, which was published after his death in 1773. It is not necessary to remind you, but it is certainly just to Erskine to remark here, that this has ever since been regarded as a book of the highest authority on the Law of Scotland, and after a lapse of more than 100 years I find the present Professor of Scots Law in the Syllabus of his Lectures for 1884-85 says: “The Lectures have special reference to the writings of Mr. Erskine, and students are strongly recommended to make themselves familiar either with his Principles, editions by Wm. Guthrie, Edin., or his Jnstitutes, edition by J. Badenoch Nicolson, Edin., 1871,” a just tribute to the value of the great labour of one of the greatest jurists the University has ever produced. Erskine was followed by William Wallace, Advocate, in the Chair of Seots occupancy of the Chair. He was known as Collector of the Decisions of the Faculty of Advocates from 1772 to 1776. He died in 1786, and was succeeded by David Hume, who at the early age of twenty-eight was made Sheriff of Berwickshire, probably through the influence of his father, John Hume, whose property of Ninewells was in the county. He was afterwards Sheriff of Linlithgowshire, and a Principal Clerk of Session. When holding the latter office, he was the colleague of Sir Walter Scott, who says: “I copied over his lectures twice with my own hand from notes taken in the class; and when I have occasion to consult them, I can never sufficiently admire the penetration and clearness of conception which were necessary to the arrangement of the fabric of law formed originally under the strictest influence of feudal principles, and innovated, altered, and broken in upon by the changes of times, of habits, and of manners, until it resembles some ancient castle, partly entire, partly ruinous, partly dilapidated, patched, and altered during the succession of ages by a thousand additions and combinations, yet still exhibiting the marks of its antiquity and symptoms of the skill and wisdom of its founders, and capable of being analyzed and made the subject of a methodical plan by an architect who can understand the various styles of the different ages in which it was subjected to alteration. Such an archi- tect has Mr. Hume been to the Law of Scotland, neither wandering into fanciful and abstruse disquisitions which are the more proper subject of the antiquary, nor satisfied with presenting to his pupils a dry and undigested detail of laws in their present state, 10 but combining the past state of our legal enactments with the present, and tracing clearly and judiciously the changes which took place, and the causes which led to them.” As a lecturer, we are told Hume had a high reputation. But he never published his Lectures, and he specially prohibited their publication by his executors after his death. He published, however, a work of great learning on the Criminal Law of Scotland, and collected a volume of Decisions which was published after his death. On Hume’s promotion to be a Baron of Exchequer in 1822, he resigned the Chair, and was succeeded by George Joseph Bell, Advocate, who was appointed a Principal Clerk of Session in 1832. ‘To name George Joseph Bell to an assembly of lawyers, is to bring to their remembrance a flood of recollections of the many times he has solved their difficulties, eased their labours, and sent them from their research with a light and joyous heart. His Commentaries on the Law of Scotland and on the Principles of Mercantile Jurisprudence, and his Principles of the Law of Scotland, published as text-books for his students, will ever be a monument to his worth as a jurist and teacher of Law. Jeffrey had predicted for him a place on the bench, and it is said that he would have likely been the means of securing this for him had there been a vacancy. Cockburn writes: “Certainly no man had ever a stronger claim, so far as such claims depend on eminent fitness, than Mr. Bell had for a seat on that bench, which his great legal work had been instructing and directing for above thirty years.” John Schank More was the next and sixth Professor of Scots Law, having been appointed to the Chair in.1843. The son of a Seceding minister in North Shields, he was born in 1784, admitted Advocate in 1806, and in 1827 published an edition of Erskine’s Principles, and in 1832 an edition of Stair’s Jnstitutions, with notes and illustrations. He was an interesting lecturer and pains- taking teacher, a profound lawyer, and a great collector of books, his library consisting of 15,000 volumes. Chair of Scots The next occupant of the Chair was George Ross, Advocate, who 7h took office in 1861, and held it for the brief period of two years. He was admitted to the Bar of Scotland in 1835. He edited many volumes of Leading Cases as well as Bell’s Law Dictionary. As a Professor I remember him lecturing to a large class, which I fear proved too much for a not over-vigorous frame, as he died prematurely in 1863, mourned by a large circle of acquaintances and friends, | Ross was succeeded by George Moir, Advocate, the choice of a lt unanimous vote of the Faculty of Advocates. He, however, only held the Chair for two years, and then resigned. In 1865, Norman Macpherson, LL.D., Advocate, Sheriff of Dumfriesshire, was elected Professor of Scots Law, and still holds the office. In 1807, eighty-five years after the last erection of a Law Chair, the Faculty of Law was again enriched by another Professorship, viz. that of ‘Medical Jurisprudence and Medical Police.” In 1798, Dr. Duncan, Professor of the Institutes of Medicine, memorialized the Town Council on the subject, stating that he had been in the habit of lecturing upon it once a week, and recommended the formation of a Professorship. This move was said to be in the interest of his son. The Senatus, having been asked for their opinion, condemned the proposal, and gave it as their opinion that the “multiplying of Professorships, especially on new subjects of education, does not promise to advance the prosperity or dignity of the University.” Nine years afterwards, however, the Town Council and the officers of the Crown were able to procure a Commission from George III. creating a “ Pro- fessorship of Medical Jurisprudence and Medical Police, as taught in every University of reputation on the Continent of Europe,” with an endowment of £100 a year out of the Bishops’ Rents, and appointing Dr. Andrew Duncan, junior, to be the first Professor. It is said that, although originally proposed to the Town Council by his father, it was the son who had called the attention of the Medical Faculty to it, and thus the real originator of the Chair was the first to hold it. His residence and study in Continental University towns, on the completion of his medical studies at home, had evidently inspired him with the utility of the study of “State Medicine,” the name given by the Germans to this branch of science. The Chair, however, was not admitted as part of the regular compulsory medical curriculum till 1833, although in 1825 it was made an optional alternative class for the M.D. degree. This was in the time of the third holder of the Chair (William Pulteney Alison having held it for one year), viz. Robert Christi- son, afterwards Sir Robert Christison, Bart., who in 1822, in his twenty-fourth year, was appointed Professor. At first, Christison says, his students were chiefly young lawyers; and of these he had at first twelve, afterwards five, and then only one. © But this did not daunt the young and courageous Professor. Though unremunera- tive, he continued to lecture; and on the class being made an optional alternative for the M.D. degree, his numbers increased. Chair of Medical Jurisprudence, Chair of Con- veyancing. 12 When he left the Chair, on his election to the Professorship of Materia Medica, he had a class of ninety students. Christison was succeeded by Thomas Stewart Traill, M.D., in 1832, thirty years after his graduation; and he lectured till within twelve days of his death in 1862, in his 81st year, having occupied the Chair for about thirty years. The next Professor of Medical Jurisprudence was Douglas Maclagan, M.D., who is the present occupant of the Chair. In 1825, the Chair of Conveyancing was added to the Faculty of Law. There seems to have been some difficulty made about its creation even by the Society which afterwards was anxious for its foundation. It seems that, in 1750, the institution of the Chair was strongly urged by some members of the legal profession. The Society of Writers to the Signet, however, strongly resisted it, as it would interfere with the duties of masters to their apprentices. In 1793, however, they had got other light upon the subject, and they instituted a Lectureship on Conveyancing, not, however, in the University. In 1796, the Society tried to get the Lectureship erected into a Chair in the University, but both the Senatus and the Faculty of Advocates successfully opposed this move, on the ground that it would interfere with the class of Scots Law. The Town Council, however, in 1825, erected the Chair in the University, the Society of Writers to the Signet providing the salary of £100 per annum. The first Professor was Macvey N apier, who in 1816, seventeen years after he had passed W.S., had been appointed Lecturer on Conveyancing by the W.S. Society. He had, previous to his appointment as Professor, attained considerable reputation as a man of letters and a critic, and was in later days appointed editor of the Edinburgh Review in succession to J effrey. He died in 1847, at the age of seventy, and was succeeded by Allan Menzies, W.S., who had as a student greatly distinguished himself in the Arts classes. In later years, as Clerk to the Trustees of the Dick Bequest, and visitor of their schools, he did much to put the education in the counties of Aberdeen, Banff, and Moray in the high state of efficiency for which they have for many years been distinguished. As a family practitioner, he had a large and lucrative practice made by himself. As a lecturer he had a large class of attentive students, who profited greatly by the system of written examinations in the class, without notes or books, which he was the first to introduce. He suffered much from deafness, and it may have been owing to this infirmity that he adopted a plan of 13 examination which is now universal, and conduces so much to the proper acquisition of every University subject. His lectures were characterized by great literary taste. They were published after his death, and have already gone through three editions. Like so many distinguished lawyers, he was the son of a Scotch manse, where he learned that conscientious regard for duty, and acquired those habits of conduct and hard work, which, while they placed him at an early period of his life in honour and a high position in his profession, also contributed to his death at a comparatively youthful age. In 1856 he was succeeded by Alexander Montgomerie Bell, W.S., for long a partner of the well-known legal firm of Dundas & Wilson, W.S. In this business he acquired that extensive and accurate knowledge of Conveyancing which made him rank as a teacher of consummate ability. His Lectures were published by his son after his death, and are now the leading text-book on the subject. The labours of an anxious Conveyancing business, com- bined with those of a very largely-attended class, proved too much for a not over-robust constitution ; and I well remember him in his later days coming to his class-room, where his lectures were read by his son, in a very exhausted bodily condition. Such labours cut short a beautiful life and a gentle spirit; and on his death in 1866, James Stuart Fraser Tytler, LL.D., W.S., a member of a family who had done much for the teaching of Law in the University of Edinburgh, as we have already seen, in former days, was appointed Professor of Conveyancing, and still holds the office. One other Chair remains to be noticed in tracing the history of the teaching of Law in this University, and that is the “ Chair o Commercial] and Political Economy and Mercantile Law.” This Professorship was founded in 1871 by the Merchant Company of Edinburgh—£10,000 being appropriated by it for the purpose of founding a Chair in the University, the teaching from which would be valuable for future merchants, out of the surplus funds coming into their hands from a redistribution of certain educational endowments under their control. The tenure of office, however, is only for seven years, with eligibility for re- election. The step thus taken seems to have been looked upon by the Merchant Company as an experiment. In the result hitherto, however, it must be deemed a success. The Curators and the Master and Treasurer of the Merchant Company were fortunate in securing for the first occupancy of this Chair, William Ballantine Chair of Con- veyancing. Chair of Political- Economy, etc. Degrees in Law. 14 Hodgson, who already as an economist, an educationist, and lecturer, had established a well-merited reputation. His class during his first six years of tenure averaged fifty students. He was reappointed on the expiry of the seven years of his tenure, and on his sudden death from heart disease in 1880, the present Professor, Joseph Shield Nicholson, was elected for a period of seven years. And thus Law has come to be taught—partly because of the foresight of the Crown, the patrons, or their advisers, and partly because of the necessity created, as evinced by attendance on the extra-mural lectures of some enterprising citizen. The growth has been slow, and sometimes the patrons for the time being, or their advisers, have not read aright the signs of the times. It does not seem much to have established only seven Chairs for the teaching of so large and important a subject during a life of 300 years. But Law is proverbially slow and uncertain in its develop- ment and operations, and so we must be thankful that since 1707, when Public Law was founded; to 1710, when Civil Law was founded; to 1719, when the Chair of History was founded; to 1722, when the Chair of Scots Law was founded; to 1807, when Medical Jurisprudence was founded ; to 1825, when Conveyancing was founded; to 1871, when Political Economy and Mercantile Law was founded; we have now seven Chairs established in the Faculty of Law in the University of Edinburgh, and that its legal curriculum is more complete than that of Dy other Uni- versity in the kingdom. But comparatively complete as it is, the Unteerae authorities by the Faculty of Law, the Senatus and the University Court have proclaimed by my presence here to-day that in their opinion the curriculum can be made more complete still, and this remark leads me now to explain how it is that a lectureship on Civil Pro- cedure in the Courts of Law in Scotland has been instituted in this University, and how I have come to be the first exponent of this branch of legal lore. The University of Edinburgh confers three degrees in Law, z.: the degrees of LL.D., LL.B., and B.L. The first of these is conferred honoris causa by voice of the Senate on such persons as in their opinion merit the distinction by their writings, or research in the various branches of science and learning, and every year at the April graduation a number of such degrees are conferred. This was the only degree in law till, by an ordinance of the then University Commissioners in 1862, neg 15 instituted the dégree of LL.B. The candidates for the degree must be graduates in Arts of a Scotch, English, or Irish Univer- sity, or of some other University approved by the Senatus and University Court. They require to attend a course of study in Law over three academical years, and must attend (1) a course of at least sixty lectures in Civil Law, Scots Law, and Conveyancing ;! and (2) a course of at least forty lectures in Public Law, Constitutional Law, and Medical Jurispru- dence. The examination for the degree extends over all these subjects. This degree so wisely instituted was not, however, popular, and for these reasons probably—(1) it was not the only necessary portal for admission to practice in any branch of the profession ; and (2) because the mass of Law students do not take the degree of M.A., as, early in life, they are engrossed in the work of an office, and have not time for other than legal studies at a Univer- sity. And thus it came about that only twenty-four gentlemen graduated as LL.B. between 1864 and 1872, and in 1873 no one at all. The University authorities accordingly instituted a new degree, viz. B.L., which they thought would be more largely taken. For this degree, unless an M.A., a candidate only requires attendance on one course of study on the Faculty of Arts in a University, as for the degree of LL.B., but must pass a satisfac- tory examination in—(1) Latin; (2) Greek, French, or German ; and (8) any two of the following subjects: Logic, Moral Philo- sophy, and Mathematics. He requires to study Law at least two academical years in the University of Edinburgh, and must attend the classes of Civil Law, Scots Law, and Conveyancing, and any one of the classes of History, Public Law, and Medical Juris- prudence. ‘This degree has now been taken during ten years by twenty-three gentlemen, while thirty-four gentlemen have during the same period taken the degree of LL.B. It would thus seem that the new degree in the first decade of its existence had not been more popular than the superior degree of LL.B. in its first decade, while the latter has attained an increased popularity of nearly fifty per cent. The institution of the LL.B. degree would, however, seem to have stimulated to degree-taking in Law, as the period before 1874 only produced twenty-four Law graduates, while the number since has been fifty-eight. Let us hope that 1 By an Order of Her Majesty in Council, dated 11th August 1884, attendance may be given on the Class of Commercial and Political Economy instead of the Class of Conveyancing. Degrees in Law, Law Fellowship founded, 16 the next decade will show as great, if not a greater, ratio of increase.’ It is not unworthy of notice that increased degree-taking in Law is contemporaneous with possible reward for the labour thus incurred, ‘The first premium for degrees in Law was instituted by the Edinburgh University Endowment Association in 1878. In that year they founded a fellowship of £100, tenable for three years. It is open to holders of the LL.B. or L.B. degrees of not more than five years’ standing, and is awarded to the competitor “who shall present the best thesis on a subject comprised within the course of study required for the degree of LL.B. in the Uni- versity.” It will be observed that for the six years before 1879, the average number of gentlemen taking a Law degree was 2:0, while since 1879 and the founding of University Fellowship, the average has been 7:4. I suspect in learning, as in everything else nowadays, the question, Will it pay ? quod meruit? is the turning- point for making any exertion, effort, or acquisition; and the possibility of becoming the holder of a fellowship of £100 per annum for three years is sufficient inducement to study for a degree, which otherwise in itself is of little practical benefit. It is right I should here mention, as a factor in the history of the teaching of Law, the lectures of the first, and till now the only, holder of this fellowship, viz. Mr. John Ferguson M‘Lennan, M.A., Aberdeen, Advocate, who during his tenure of the fellow- ship delivered a course of lectures on the “ Law of Contract,” which were free to those who attended, and I am glad to say the attendance was large. The Vans-Dunlop Scholarships, recently founded, should also stimulate to degree-taking. 1 TABLE SHOWING NUMBER OF GRADUATES IN LAW FROM 1864 To 1884. LL.B. : LL.B. iB: 1864, pool pt) vile, 1878 ey ih ea a LOSE crt aot wile 1 1865, 1 | 1876, Lantaz 6. 1 1866, 4 | 1877, 2 | 1877, 2 1867, 1 | 1878, 2 | 1878, 1 1868, 2 | 1879, 1 | 1879, 7 1869, 1 | 1880, 4 | 1880, 6 1870, 6 | 1881, 7| 1881, 2 1371, 6 | 1882, 3 | 1882, 2 1872, 2 | 1883, 8 | 1883, 0 1873, 0 | 1884, 5 | 1884, 1 1874, 1 25 34 23 17 I have said that the degrees in Law are in themselves of little practical value. I should qualify this remark by stating that the degree of LL.B., though not an essential, still admits to the profession of Advocate without further examination; while not essential, still the same degree and that of B.L. admits to the profession of Law Agent, provided an examination on the Practice of the Courts is passed to the satisfaction of the examiners under the Law Agents Act, and the usual apprenticeship gone through. Now it was found that gentlemen who held the degree of LL.B. Grades fe or B.L. failed to pass on this subject before the Law Agents’ disqualified in examiners, and the Faculty of Law very naturally felt agerieved at their graduates being found disqualified upon it. The subject is really part of the course of Scots Law, just as Conveyancing was supposed to be so in days gone by; but the Professor admits that he has not time to teach it. The Faculty accordingly resolved that there should be separate teaching upon it; and at their request, with the sanction and approval of the Senatus and Court of this University, the subject begins to be taught to-day within the walls of this University as a separate and distinct branch. You will pardon any apparent egotism if I now for a few moments take up your time, by telling you how it comes about that I have been selected to expound it. By the Law Agents Act of 1873, and relative Act of Sederunt, Difculty in it is required of every applicant for admission to the office of i neronaeene © Law Agent in Scotland to pass an examination inter alia on Forms ba oe of Process. This includes Procedure in the Inferior as well as Superior Courts of Scotland. Now as a matter of fact, at the time of the passing of the Act, the last treatise on the subject of Practice in the Court of Session was that by Sir Charles Farquhar Shand, whose book was a most valuable one; but having been published in 1848, prior to the passing of the very sweeping reforms in Practice accomplished by the 1850 and the 1868 Acts, it was very misleading to any one studying the subject. The consequence was, that students had the greatest difficulty in getting information on the subject; and although few questions on it were put, the examiners had in very many cases to refuse to pass applicants in their Law examination, by their failure in this branch.' It has been said, as it was of Conveyancing of old, that 1 The critic of Mr. Black’s ‘‘The Law Agents Act, 1873, etc.,” in the Journal of Jurisprudence of March 1884, says:—‘‘ As forms of process are not included in the curriculum for the degree, a Bachelor of Laws may be absolutely ignorant of the mode in which legal proceedings require to be conducted in this country. Surely Lectures on -rocedure, Success of Lectures. 18 knowledge on this subject should be obtained in the chambers of practitioners in Edinburgh. The answer to that is simply this, that of late years Court Practice has had a tendency of concen- trating in a few legal firms, and they could not possibly receive all applicants; while the Court Practice of smaller businesses is far too limited to give any idea of the very many modi operandi embraced in the term Forms of Process. Prior to the passing of the Act referred to, I had become in 1872 officially connected with the Supreme Court, and shortly after the Act came into operation, from my supposed knowledge of the subject, from the many cases I saw, I was frequently applied to for information, while I was early led to see how great was the need of proper teaching on the subject. Some of the examiners, too, and specially Dr. Carment, spoke to me of the difficulty they had in passing applicants on Procedure; and as the result of a conversation I had with him in the spring of 1875, I resolved to give a course of lectures on “The Law and Practice of the Court of Session.” I accordingly gave a short course as preparatory for the April examination of that year. Nine students were enrolled as members of my class, and I was glad to learn that every one of these successfully passed the examination on the subject a few days thereafter. During the next three or four years I continued to lecture with varied success in Edinburgh and Glasgow, having classes of from seven to forty-six students. At the request of some of my students, I published a handbook on Procedure in 1878; and as this could be got for a smaller price than the amount of my fee, I did not consider it necessary to lecture again till 1882-83. During these intervening years, however, I had many applications to know if I was not going to lecture, and I accordingly intimated in the beginning of the session 1882-83, that if a sufficient number gave in their names, I would resume the course. About thirty the public are entitled to expect that every person admitted to the monopoly of Court practice shall have some knowledge of those forms of process on which the rights of the lieges frequently depend.” ‘*We confess that in our opinion the examiners do not at present put as many questions on ‘Forms of Process’ as are necessary to afford a fair test of the knowledge of the candidates.” While Mr. Black himself says, at p. 187 of his book: “It will be with an anxious heart that not a few receive the Court of Session questions from Mr. Jamieson’s hand, for to most of our Scottish youth this part of their legal education is only acquired by persistent cram ; and as only four questions are propounded, there is very reasonable ground for fear that in the course of cram something important enough to be embodied in a question may have passed unnoticed in the wilderness of regulations, Acts of Sederunt, and Court of Session minutie, etc.” ih students gave in their names, and out of these I opened a class of twenty, to whom the hour fixed was suitable. In the following session, 1883-84, I had only a class of four, the smallest I ever had, the reason for this being, I was told, that having on the advice of my professional friends raised my fee to £2, 2s., it was thought too much for a twenty-lecture course. It is true, more literature on the subject of my course now exists Tagen than was the case some years ago. In the Practice of the Supreme Courts, Dr. Mackay’s book will ever stand as a monu- ment to his labour, learning, and skill in preparing a very exhaustive treatise on the subject, while Mr. Spinks’ book and my own handbook will be found useful as books of ready reference. In the Practice of the Inferior Courts, Sheriff Dove Wilson and Sheriff Lees’ volumes will give most, if not all, needful information on the subject. But one and all of these books have been patent to students for five or six years now, and still the examiners for the Law Agents’ Examination say there is deficiency on the part of candidates in this branch of study. They, too, along with the Professors of Law in the University, desire that it be systematically taught, and hence, after extra- mural teaching of several years, I, as the only lecturer on the subject, am appointed to intra-mural teaching, and have the very responsible and arduous duty of organizing this branch of legal study in this University. For the first time, so far as I am aware, Civil Procedure is taught i apres in a University in this kingdom. It is, however, a common class a A in the Universities of Germany, where it is taught sometimes as a special branch by a Professor of the subject, and sometimes as part of another course. I can see no reason why it should not be specially taught in this country, where the necessity for its knowledge is as great.) It is not the first time, as we have previously observed, that we have copied the Germans in their advance in learning. True, there are now books upon the subject; but experience proves that special cram from books for an examination immediately following, is apt to give very superficial knowledge, and is not enough, even for the examination itself, much less for the after necessities of professional life. For 1 In Lord Moncreiff’s address on ‘‘ Legal Education,” to the Juridical Society in 1870, he says: ‘‘It is of the greatest consequence, to whichever branch of the pro- _fession the student intends to belong, that he should be thoroughly armed with the ‘forms before he begins, for there is nothing so painful as learning them afterwards ; and whether he practise at the bar or behind the bar, he will find the greatest possible advantage from having all his forms at his finger ends.” Province of Lectureship. 20 such the mind requires to be filled with, and drilled in, the information slowly and gradually, and accustomed by oft-repeated reference to the details of the subject, to feel thoroughly at home in it. I have hitherto spoken of the subject of my course, and referred to it in terms signifying your knowledge to some extent of its nature and scope. Allow me, however, in my closing remarks to open up the subject a little to you, and explain to you generally the province of this Lectureship. In the class of Scots Law, the student is instructed upon the rights of parties in their various relations to others, and in property heritable and moveable; and as a foundation for my subject, it is highly expedient that a student know what rights can be enforced. It is at this point that the utility of this class comes in. You learn for example, in the class of Scots Law, that given certain circumstances, a contract is constituted or made; that two or more persons have rights which they can enforce. But here you are left in darkness, and you must find out for yourselves how obligation is to be enforced if the contract is not peaceably fulfilled. And so the teaching of this class comes to your aid and tells you to what tribunal you are to resort; what form your action is to take; what pleas you are to maintain; how you are to conduct it ; what defence will be stated; how and when it will be made; and how you are to arrange your forces, and carry on the battle from field to field, till you quit as victor in the fight ; and then how you will obtain the costs of the war, and implement or damage for the breach of contract. Most of these details are either regulated by Statute or Act of Sederunt (7.e. an order of the Lords of Council and Session), or they are subject to decision of the Court. So far as time permits, it will be my endeavour to make you acquainted with one and all of them, and so picture to you each likely battle-field, that when you enter it in actual professional life, you will have some idea of what it is, and be able to bring up your forces and carry on the fight as will enable you to come off conquerors ; or if you lose, that it may be, not because of want of knowledge of the law or legal tactics, but because your clients have not hearkened to your wise and better counsels, when you advised those things which make for peace. iele MeV ERSITY SYSTEM OG? Kk WUAINK BY JOHN P. COLDSTREAM, W.S. LECTURER IN THE UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH ON CIVIL AND CRIMINAL PROCEDURE IN THE LAW COURTS OF SCOTLAND ; EXTRAORDINARY MEMBER, FORMERLY ONE OF THE PRESIDENTS, OF THE JURIDICAL SOCIETY OF EDINBURGH EDINBURGH JAMES THIN, PusuisHeR TO THE UNIVERSITY 1888 THE following pages formed the subject of the introductory lecture to my class in the University of Edinburgh this Session. In the hope of its being useful to a wider circle, on the advice of friends, I now publish it in this form. I take this opportunity of acknowledging my obligations to Professors Westerkamp and Stengel, and to Dr. Dreyling of the University of Marburg, for their kind revision of most of the facts given—to Messrs. Taylor Innes and Goudy, Advocates, for helpful suggestions, and to Dr. Felkin and Mr. J. J. Cook, LL.B., for useful comments and additional facts, to all of which I have given careful consideration, and many of which I have embodied in the text or footnotes. les ee ©: 6 BUCKINGHAM TERRACE, EDINBURGH, 30th November 1888. Tye . Gh Bi TA ae use is AY U ; As By SO) ia ie ', we se Pa ae on THE UNIVERSITY SYSTEM OF GERMANY. At a time when the subject of a change in the constitution of the Scottish Universities is impending, it does not seem unnatural that we, the members of this University, should look around us to ascertain what are the arrangements of Univer- sities in other countries, and what are the systems which there prevail for carrying on the work which a University professes to accomplish. In this way, perhaps, we may gather instruction which will either help us to better our own, or prevent us from making mistakes by adopting some part of their system which it would be inexpedient for us to incorporate with ours. With this object in view, I venture to place before you in the following remarks the results of the study which I have recently made of the University system of Germany. I have confidence in doing so, because the facts and statements sub- mitted have been carefully gone over by two Professors and a Graduate of a German University, who testify that I have been able to give a very accurate account of the German University system, and that nothing else occurred to them as worthy of mention to give a general idea of its working. JI am glad to have this testimony, as otherwise I would have had considerable diffidence in entering upon the subject after the comparatively short time which I was able last summer to give to its study upon the spot. The result of this study, and my observations of German life generally, and University life in particular, has been to lead me to advise all young men who have the time and the means, and not much of the latter is required, to take their holiday early in summer, when all the German Universities will be found in 6 The University System of Germany. full working order, and spend it in such a University town as Heidelberg, Marburg, Tiibingen, or Freyburg, where interesting study can be combined with excursions and pastimes in a lovely country around. They will return, I am sure, with widened sympathies, and better able for their intercourse with their fellow-men. University Statistics. There are twenty-two Universities in Germany, and, according to the last published Universitdts Kalender, there were in attendance 30,880 students with 2259 Professors and other members of the teaching staff within their walls.! Berlin, the largest University, had 7068 students and 311 teachers— while Rostock, the smallest, had 340 students and 43 teachers. The population of the German Empire is given as 46,855,704, so that there is about one student in the Universities of Germany to about every 1500 persons of its population. In Scotland there are four Universities, with an aggregate attendance in 1886-87 of 6879 students. The popula- tion of Scotland is 4,034,156, so that about one young man out of every 586 persons,—deducting foreign element, about one in 700 or 800 of the population, attends the Scotch Universities. In both countries, however, we must discount a large foreign element, and probably a very much larger foreign element in Scotland—owing to the fame of the Medical School of Edinburgh—than in Germany. Last Session, for instance, out of 1874 students of Medicine in Edinburgh, only 793 belonged to Scotland, and 676 to England and Wales. The fame of Edinburgh University has very much increased during the last 21 years—notwithstanding that there were giants in those days,—as in 1867 there were in all only 1515 students; in 1877, 2540; in 1887, 3459. If this ratio of in- crease is to go on, it is high time we were preparing for it. In comparing the number of students in attendance at the Scotch 1 There is thus apparently one teacher to about every 14 students. The University System of Germany. 7 University, it must also be borne in mind that the higher classes in the Gymnasium of Germany are virtually equivalent to our lower Arts classes. Constitution of the German University. Unlike the English University, but like the Scotch, the German University consists only of one College. The German University is governed solely under the direction of each State by means of its Minister of Education. The fabric is built and kept in repair, so far as the proper University funds do not suffice, by the State. The Professors are ultimately appointed and paid by the State. The State is represented in most Universities by an official called a Curator. He acts as an intermediary between the Senate of each University and the Minister of Education in the State to which it belongs. He has a larger salary than most of the Professors, being about £450 per annum. The German University has no Court of Curators, no Rector’s Court, no General Council, and no Students’ Representative Council, and it’ seems to get on very well without them. It has not either a University Students’ Union, which I am glad to learn we are soon to have fairly established in our midst. I understand, however, a large sum is still required for its proper equipment. Large however—upwards of £3000 I believe —as it is, it could easily be got if each matriculated student of this University would undertake to subscribe or collect among his friends £1 by the beginning of next year. Kindly consider the matter, and come to the aid of those who have hitherto worked so well for your benefit. . The internal affairs of the German University, so far as not State matters, such as the nomination of a Rector, and the con- sideration of, and suggestion to the State of what appears to it as necessary University legislation, are the matters chiefly coming under the cognisance of the Senatus. This body con- 8 The University System of Germany. sists of all the ordinary Professors presided over by the Rector of the University. The Rector is one of the Professors, and has virtually the same position as the Principal of the Scotch University, there being in a German University no Rector, in our sense, nor Chancellor or Vice-Chancellor. The Rector is appointed by the Professors. He holds office for one year, but is eligible for re-election. An official called Universitéts Richter superintends the conduct of the students, and in case of necessity, and in con- nection with the Rector—and in rare cases the Board of the University—imposes punishment, which may consist of expul- sion from the University or confinement in cells within its walls. The Faculties. As a rule, there are, as with us, four Faculties, viz. Theology, Law, Medicine, and Philosophy (or Arts), but in the University of Munich there is a fifth Faculty, called Staats- wirthschaftliche Facultdét (Political Economy), which is one for training young men for the service of the State, specially in Forestry, and in which are taught such subjects as National Economy, System of Political Science and Politics, Financial Science, History of Civilisation during the time of the Renais- sance and Reformation, Produce and Profits of a Forest, and Forest Technology, Climatology and Meteorology, and instruc- tion in Meteorological Observations, Botanical Chemistry with regard to Forest and Agricultural Economy, Forest Excursions. A Faculty such as this is much needed in our Universities, and some of our Professors have, I believe, already strongly urged its establishment. In general the Faculties are much more numerously manned than with us. In Munich, for example, which has about the same number of students as Edinburgh University —3448 last Winter Session as against 3459 with us—there are at least nine ordinary Professors in the Theological Faculty, The University System of Germany. 9 besides two Privat-Docenten or Lecturers, in all eleven teachers to our four in the same Faculty, while in the Faculty of Law there are eleven Ordinary Professors, one Extraordinary Pro- fessor, and five Privat-Docenten or Lecturers,—in all seventeen teachers, to our seven or eight in the same Faculty. In the Faculty of Philosophy the disparity is still more striking, as in Munich there are at least 58 Teachers, 27 of whom are Ordinary, 6 Extraordinary, and 26 Privat-Docenten, while in Edinburgh there are in all only 17 Professors and 2 or 3 Lecturers. The Professors and Lecturers. The Professors are divided into two classes, called Ordinary and Extraordinary. For some branches of study there is both an Ordinary and an Extraordinary Professsor within the University, and in addition there can be a Privat-Docent who lectures upon the same subject within the walls of the University. As already remarked, the Professors are appointed by the State. When a vacancy occurs in a Chair, the Faculty to which it belongs look around them for a suitable successor. They nominate three persons from among the Extraordinary Professors, Privat-Docenten, or outsiders—it may be a Professor from another University. The names of the persons so nominated are submitted to the Minister of Education, or in some cases to the King or Grand Duke of the State, as the case may be, with whom the ultimate selection and appointment lies, but he may appoint some one else. This mode of appointment is said to work well. The Privat-Docent applies for the position to the Faculty in which he desires to teach, and after proof of quali- fication by written dissertation or otherwise he is appointed by the Faculty. The Ordinary Professors and the Extraordinary Professors have salaries paid to them by the State, and they receive the fees of the students who attend their lectures. The Privat- A2 10 The University System of Germany Docenten, on the other hand, as a rule, only have the fees of their students as their emoluments of office. The Ordinary Professors have the highest standing, and alone are members of the Senate. The Ordinary Professors have alone the right, as conferred by the State, to conduct the examinations which qualify for the degrees. As a rule, most of the Professors require to give their whole time to the duties of their office. The Theological Professors cannot be ministers of a parish, or have charge of a congrega- tion. The Law Professors cannot practise, or hold judicial office, without the authority of the State, and, as a matter of fact, not five per cent. of their number do it. The Medical Professors, on the other hand, are allowed to practise. The Professors cannot, without authority from the State, be Directors of Public Companies, and, as a matter of fact, they are not. The view held is that their University duties require their whole time, and that their services and counsel should always be available for the student, while their spare hours should be spent in the advancement of science and learning. They further recognise the view that there are too many men in Germany to be provided for to justify plurality of offices or occupations, unless when an absolute necessity exists in certain cases. The German University emphatically in practice asserts the principle that it exists for the benefit of students and the Fatherland at large, and not merely as a means of giving to the Professor a berth, emolument, position, or occupation. The emoluments of the Professors, on the other hand, are not large. The State salaries of the Ordinary Professors are from £200 to £600 per annum. The students’ fees are small, being from 12 to 20 marks or shillings in the Philosophy course, and the same in Theology, 10s. to 42s. in Law, and 20s, in Medicine, according to the length of the course. Ten shillings is con- sidered a good fee for a 30 to 40 lecture course in the Faculty of Law.! 1 In Germany the fees are paid to the University Accountant, and not to the Professors themselves. The University System of Germany. 11 As already stated, the German Professor lives, as a rule, solely for his work, the benefit of his students, and the advancement of Science. He comes very much into personal contact with his students. He lectures to them in his class- room. He meets them in the Seminaries (rooms attached to the class-rooms, with libraries of books on the subject of instruction), where, around a table, the Professor and students gather; and by means of easy talk, by way of question and answer, the students have the opportunity of obtaining from their Professor information which they cannot acquire in the lecture-room. Some of the Professors are in the habit of meeting with their students in their own houses, as well as in what are known as “ Kneipen,” which are reunions in a restaurant or café, held once or twice a week, In some cases papers by the students on the subject of study are read at these meetings, and in all cases beer is drunk, smoking is indulged in, speeches are made, songs are sung, and good- humoured jokes, practical and others, in which sometimes the Professor is made to play a prominent part, are a feature of the evening’s proceedings. The Professor has generally a “ Sprech-stunde” every day, when he receives his present and former students and he can be consulted freely by them. A glance at the programme of study in a German University will convince the reader that much work is accomplished in asemester. As arule, on an average, the Professor lectures, or has exercises in Seminary, twice a day, and sometimes on six days in the week. In each session he often has two courses of lectures—four in the year—and the subdivision of subjects is, in consequence, much greater than in the Scotch Universities. The following is a list of the Professors and Lecturers, with programme of study, in the Faculty of Law in the University of Munich :— Ord.-Prof. J. J. W. v. Puranc—Criminal Procedure. Juridical Seminary. Essays upon Civil Suits. K. v. Maurer—Selected chapters from the old Nordisk Criminal Law. 12 The University System of Germany. C. H. Boteiano—German Civil Procedure (using his Handbook of Imperial Civil Procedure, introductory part, Stuttgart, 1879). Viva voce practice in Civil Procedure. A. Brecumann—Institutes of Roman Law. Pandects 11., Family and Hereditary Right. Civil Exercises in Juridical Seminary. E. Srurrert—Pandects, without Family and Hereditary Right. Bail and Hypothecary Rights. H. v. SicHERER—German Commercial Law and Exchange Regulations. Church Right Exercises in Juridical Seminary. H.v. HottzeEnporF—Criminal Law, introductory part. International Law. J. Bercutotp—History of German Empire and Law. Conversational and Practical Exercises about Imperial and Ecclesiastical Law. En- cyclopedia of Jurisprudence, with especial regard to Forestry Students. Exercises in Ecclesiastical Law in the Juridical Seminary. ©. BrirKMEYER—Philosophy of Law. Criminal Law, especially Part Iv. Conversation about the special part of Criminal Law. Criticisms of the Verdicts of the Supreme Court in Civil Cases. M. SevpeLt—Imperial Law. German Administrational Law, with special regard to Bavaria. Prof.-Ext. F. Hetpmann—Institutes of Roman Private Law. Repetitions of Pandects. German law of Bankruptcy. D. C. C. E. Grueser—TIntroductory part of Pandects. Exposition of Pas- sages in the sources of Law, and Discourses about controversies, in conjunction with his Lectures about Pandects. Exercises about Romance Law, in the Juridical Seminary. P. Lormar—History of Roman Law. M. LowrenreLtp—Pandects 11., Family and Hereditary Law. H. Harsureer—Conversation about difficult chapters of Criminal Law (especially from the introductory part), and Law of German Criminal Procedure. Rudiments of Imperial Law. G. KLEINFELLER—Lectures about the Law of Civil Procedure. Con- versation about Criminal Law (introductory part). Conversation about Constitutional Procedure. At one course, the Professor may lecture to students of their first or second year, and at the other he may to those further on in their studies. As already indicated, the student often has the choice in the same University of his teacher on a subject, as there may be an Extraordinary Professor or a Privat-Docent or both lecturing upon it, as well as the ordinary Professor, and thus competition is ensured and the evils of monopoly avoided. The Professor is appointed ad vitam aut culpam. If he is unable to lecture from age or infirmity, some one else guoad The University System of Germany. 13 this duty will take his place, but he will retain for life his place in the Senate and his salary. Although he may receive an appointment from the State to a chair in another University, he cannot, although a State official, against his will, be merely transferred from one University to another. The German Student. As a rule, the German student enters the University from the Gymnasium or Realgymnasium ‘*—the Secondary Schools of Germany—between the ages of seventeen and twenty. This appears to be a good age for University life to begin. The student then is not merely a boy, but has attained that age when he is better able to appreciate the advantages which the University has to offer. He has, moreover, received a very thorough training in the Gymnasium. The Gymnasium is a Secondary School of a very superior character, and (at the close of a curriculum of nine years, which is two years longer than our Secondary School cur- riculum) sends forth the student very well equipped for his University work. The Exit Examination qualifying for entrance to the University is one of considerable difficulty, and the student who passes it must be possessed of ripe scholar- ship. It is said to be one which many a graduate in Science, Medicine, and Law, in our Universities could not pass. If the student has not obtained a certificate of efficiency when he leaves the Gymnasium—which, however, for the Student of Law, Medicine, Theology and Classics, is necessary —he requires to pass, during the course of his study, an examination which qualifies equally for the same purpose. There are two semesters or sessions in the year. The winter semester commences on 15th October and ends on 15th March. The summer semester commences on 15th April and ends on 15th August. At the beginning of each semester the 1The Realgymnasium differs from the Gymnasium in its scope of teach- ing—modern languages forming the prominent feature of its curriculum. 14 The University System of Germany. students attending the University for the first time are addressed in public by the Rector. He explains to them the regulations of the University, and, 1 am told, sometimes the Rector shakes hands with them individually. The students’ names are inscribed in a Matriculation-book. Having selected the Faculty in which he desires to gradu- ate or study, the student presents himself to the Professors or Lecturers whose lectures he proposes to attend. He receives a book on Matriculation, which each of the Professors or Lecturers whose lectures are attended signs when the student enrols himself in his class, as also at the close of the semester. It then depends solely on the inclination of the student what amount of attendance and work—unless he is a bursar, in whose case strict regulations prevail—he will give to his classes. There are no means taken during the semester, by roll-calling, card-taking, or examinations, to test the one or the other, and he is quite at liberty, provided his book is signed by the Professors at the beginning and end of the requisite number of sessions, to go up at the close of his curriculum for his examination without ever having attended the lectures at all. From one point of view, the freedom of the German student may be regarded as an evil, It is true he is older generally than the Scotch student when he begins his Uni- versity life, and obtains this freedom, and should be supposed to know better how to use his time. Very often, however, the severe strain to which he is subjected in the Gymnasium during his last two years of attendance there, finds relief in too great relaxation from study in the beginning of his University career. As I have mentioned before, the student can select the Ordinary Professor, the Extraordinary Professor, or the Privat- Docent as the lecturer upon the subject on which he desires instruction. There is a decided advantage in this course, as thereby each of the teachers, barring nobler inducements, has held out to him, by a large attendance, an incentive to keep Lhe University System of Germany. 15 himself abreast of his subject. As a rule, however, it is the ordinary Professor who has the largest class, as it is before him the student has to appear for the examination for the degree he proposes to take. As already indicated, the student has frequent opportunities of meeting his Professors and becoming acquainted with the details of the subjects he desires to study in other ways than by means of lectures. The diligent and earnest student with- out any compulsion embraces all his means of acquiring knowledge, and the lectures of an eminent Professor are always well attended, thus proving that, given good lectures, the student, even when not compelled to attend, will include this mode of instruction in his Academic curriculum. The amount of time given to lectures and private study depends naturally upon the inclination of each student. A diligent student will attend lectures and seminary from four to six hours a day, and that on six days in the week, while he will prosecute his private studies and class preparations for from two to four hours more. Degree-taking. For the examination for his degree in Theology, Philosophy, and Law, the German student presents himself to the faculty in which he desires to graduate at the close of an attendance of six semesters (three years), which attendance can have been either in the University whose degree he elects to take, or at that University, and five or six others, or at other Universities alone ; for he can take his degree at any University, although he has never attended classes in it, and he can attend classes for his degree in six Universities, a semester in each. For his degree, he writes a dissertation on a subject selected by himself, and thereafter he is examined by the members of the Faculty on the subjects which he has himself chosen in the curriculum of the Faculty. The day before he appears for 16 The University System of Germany. examination, attired in evening dress, he calls during their «“ Sprech-stunde ” upon the Examiners who are to examine him. At the examination he is examined orally, and if he answers satisfactorily he there and then obtains his degree, and his dissertation is published. In practice there is no public con- ferring of degrees such as is the custom in this country, although it is required by law, but there is power of dispensa- tion by the Faculty or University which is usually if not always exercised. The day following the examination, the candidate, whether he has passed or not, again attired in evening costume, pays his respects to the Professors during their “ Sprech-stunde.” In one University—Marburg—if not others, when the student has successfully passed his examinations, his friends procure carriages and pairs of horses, and with him as their hero of the hour drive through the streets and environs of the town, stopping by the way at the chief hotels or public-houses and drink in beer to his honour and his fame. The degrees most commonly taken are those of Doctor of Philosophy and Doctor of Medicine.t Almost all those who wish to qualify for teacher take the former. The degree of Doctor of Laws, although conferred after examination, is not very frequently taken. It does not qualify to practise in the Courts. Lawyers as well as Doctors of Medicine, desiring to practise, must pass the State Examinations. Debating Societies, Clubs, Duels, etc. As a rule, there are not in the German Universities the Debating Socities which exist in our Universities. There are, however, Students’ Societies and Clubs, which have for their principal object social reunion. They meet generally once a week, in the evenings, and, as already stated, the entertainment is of a convivial character. Most of these clubs also have as 1 Dr. Felkin informs me that for difficulty and scope, the examination in the German University for M.D. is far harder than with us, The University System of Germany. 17 one of their objects the training and exercise of its members in sword-exercise, and frequently on Saturdays these clubs meet in the hotels in the surrounding villages of the Univer- sity towns, and certain of their members, selected from each of the clubs, protected in their eyes and the vital parts of their bodies, engage in what are called friendly duels, for the glory of their respective Societies—though to a stranger it is hard to conceive how the combatants’ feelings are restrained when so much blood is spilt, and the visage, head, and ears oreatly dis- figured, and that for life, in the sanguinary conflict. A very large number of the German students one meets have at least one, and many have several scars on their face. These duels are a feature of German student-life. They are forbidden by the Statute law of the country, and on any other day but that generally selected by each University for their taking place, if engaged in, the duels would be stopped, the combatants arrested and duly punished. The general feeling, however, of the students, as well as of certain persons in authority, who themselves formerly were heroes in the fight and view it with a friendly eye, being stated to be in favour of the system, it is still allowed to hold the field in practice. In many quarters, on the other hand, there ig a strong feeling against the system, and it is believed before long some healthier amusements may take its place. The recent intro- duction of the British game of cricket into Berlin may be a step in this direction. I have been informed on good authority that the German student who has the greatest number of scars upon his cheek is the partner in the dance who is in highest favour with the German belle, but when she comes to select her husband, it is the scarless man who is the object of her choice. From what I have observed, I do not think it would be very difficult to abolish the system. On one occasion, ata Students’ “ Kneipe,” I ventured with a gloved hand to enter my protest against it as alike opposed to the laws of God and man, as well as to 18 Lhe University System of Germany. decency and civilisation, and I am glad to say my remarks were received with favour and applause. The toleration of duelling in a modified form, and the spirit thus engendered, occasionally leads to duelling of a graver character among the students, when heavy swords and bared bodies, or pistols, are the order of the day. A student once informed me he had the day previously been grossly insulted by another student, and had accordingly challenged him to a serious duel with swords, which, however, was not to take place for four months, in order to give them time for practice. I believe, however, this duel did not come off, as an American student in the University lodged a complaint about it with the Rector, who forbade it. I understand the result of this interference on the part of the American student was his being boycotted for the remainder of the Session. The English student, when resident at a German University, could do much to abolish the system altogether, by the intro- duction of lawn-tennis, cricket, and football. These games, I am told, are practically unknown to the German student. His pastimes are gymnastic exercises, skittles, swimming, boat- ing, horse-exercise, and skating in winter on the ice, besides, of course, par excellence, duelling, beer-drinking, and song- singing. Their boating and horse-exercises, however, so far as I have observed or heard of them, are not, as would be con- sidered in our country, of a first-class character—speed in neither case apparently being, in their opinion, of first impor- tance in these exercises. Most German students belong to one or other of the societies or clubs which are to be found in every University. Those who prefer to be exempt from duelling can belong toa society which excludes duelling from among its objects. Many of the clubs have, as a rule, a cap of a particular colour or shade as their distinctive badge. The members of these clubs always wear the caps of their societies. The students at large, how- ever, have no academic costume proper. The University System of Germany. 19 So far as I have observed it on the streets, the general conduct of the German student is exemplary and correct. After a beer-drinking reunion they may be a little friendly, obliging, and generous, and at times, no doubt, not quite’ so quiet or reserved as is their wont—excusing themselves with the remark, You know “ wir sind Studenten.” The student who cannot afford to pay his fees, can, on a statement of his pecuniary position, obtain from the University permission to attend the classes without payment, and there exist bursaries for their benefit, as well as other help, in the shape of free dinners at a restaurant during the semester. At the University of Marburg, for instance, there are thirty such (Frei Tische) Table Bursaries in the year. These Frei Tische are a thing unknown to us. It appears, however, to me, that we might do well to institute such in connection with our new Union. They would be a great boon to many students. To a certain extent, by a general Endowment Fund, they are in operation in the Theological Halls of the Free and United Presbyterian Churches in this City. It would, of course, require a very large sum to put the University student on a like footing, but by degrees it might be attained; and I therefore commend the matter to the consideration of those of you who can advise in the making of Wills of benevolent persons. In some German towns it is the University which virtually makes the business, trade, and occupation for its inhabitants. Three-fourths, if not more, of the students will come from the surrounding district, and some from greater distances during the semester; and lodgings and means of subsistence must be found for them. There is an ample supply for all—simple, clean, and good ; and to the poorest of the land the German University, when necessity exists, opens its door gratuitously, while living is so cheap that little hard cash is actually re- quired. Like the Scottish student, his German brother does not live 20 The University System of Germany. in a College Hall, but he resides with his parents or friends, or as a boarder, or in an ordinary lodging-house. In such Uni- versities as Berlin and Bonn, the student can, on an average, live well during the winter semester for about £30 to £35, and for £24 to £26 in the summer semester; while in Gottingen, Leipzig, and Marburg the expense will be £1 or £2 less. With economy much less would suffice. For £7 or £8, or even less, with rigid economy, an Edin- burgh student could go and come from Bonn, and £10, 10s. would fully cover his travelling expenses to and from Berlin; so that for £35 or £40 he could enjoy a capital holiday in a beautiful country or an interesting city, while at the same time he would enlarge his views and learn another language. The British and, in some cases, American student, is not conspicuous by his absence at the German University. At Berlin, Heidelberg, Bonn, and Leipzig, many will be found, and to smaller seminaries, such as Marburg, Freyburg, Tiibin- gen, and Gottingen, a few resort. When one sees and hears of them in these places, it very naturally occurs to one to ask if there is any reciprocity. Take Edinburgh, for example. How many, if any, German students, as a rule, are found annually within its walls? I cannot remember ever to have met one, except a student who is virtually a cosmopolitan at present studying here. What is the reason ? Why does the German Student not attend the Scotch University It cannot be the want of enterprise, for the German is not lacking in that for a proper object, and for one which he thinks will advance his interests. It may be that we don’t make our halls of learning sufficiently attractive to the German, so that he can feel at home in our midst, and yet I believe we are in repute for our good entertainment of strangers. Perhaps it is the want of money, and yet the German finds this too when it is for his interest to do so. It may be the too PAL =< The University System of Germany. narrowing regulations of the German States. Perhaps it is that the average German student thinks that he has nothing to learn from other sources than those which his Vaterland supplies. If so, will you allow me to say, that in my opinion he may have some good grounds for his belief ? The system of the German University is one well fitted to secure the most eminent teachers and appliances, as well as the most exhaustive and thorough work. As we have already seen, the Professor is appointed in a way to secure pre- eminence in his subject as a first qualification. The Faculty in which he is to teach—whose interest it is, for their own sakes, as well as for the reputation of their own University, to secure the best man—is the source, whence his nomination though not actual appointment takes place, and the members of the Faculty naturally look out for the best man known to them, by his writings and teaching powers. When appointed, the Professor cannot rest upon his oars, but he must ever keep, himself abreast of his work, as around him, in his own Univer- sity, there may be, and often are, teachers on the same subject, whose lectures qualify equally with his own for University degrees or State examinations. And thus, very naturally, the German student thinks that if there is anything good, new, or original, in any branch of study, to be gathered, he will find it in one or other of the many seats of learning in his own V aterland. He is confirmed in this belief by seeing how eagerly students, and even qualified professional men, resort to his country for deeper and enlarged study, while he seldom or rarely hears of his own countrymen crossing the Channel for a like purpose. But while the exception is that the German resorts to our Universities, there are of course men who have considered they could benefit by study with us—if not as students, properly so called—at all events as men anxious for special instruction in our methods, or for acquaintance with our National Institutions, and I have ever: found such men ready to admit the advantages thus secured. 22 The University System of Germany. There is not perfection in the German system, nor in ours. Each can learn from the other. But so long as we see our students of Theology, Medicine, and Law resorting in numbers for study to the Universities of Germany—and this has been the case for long—with little or no reciprocity, it becomes us. it appears to me, seriously to consider what is defective, if there is any serious defect, in our system, or what is so very superior in the German system. It should be the endeavour of every lover of his country to put our Universities in that state of efficiency which will attract Germans, as other strangers, while at the same time our poorest students should find within these walls themselves all they require thoroughly to equip them for the professions they have chosen, without being placed at a disadvantage by their richer brother, who can afford to study at seats of learning in other lands, where at present the experience of others apparently leads him to believe his ideas will be enlarged and his knowledge increased. Points of Superiority of the German University System. If then we are to consider that the object of the University is to afford to the youth of a State the means of acquiring all knowledge and information on every possible branch of Science, and not merely as a means of imparting a smattering or a surface skimming of such, or a guide to its acquisition, I venture to say that, as at present advised, my own view is that the German system is on the whole superior, as leading, as a rule, to more thorough and exhaustive work, and that specially in the following respects, viz. :— First.—In the larger number of subjects taught and in the subdivision or specialisation of the subjects embraced in the teaching of a Faculty. Thus, as already indicated, in all the Faculties in each semester, either the same Professor generally Lhe University System of Germany. 23 gives two courses of Lectures, when probably only one would be given under our system, while at the same time there may be an Extraordinary Professor, or a Privat-Docent, coming to his aid in the way of subdivision of or specialisation in his subject, or on cognate branches in the same Faculty. In this way the student does not merely get from lectures general information on a subject, and thus has the opportunity of becoming a man of culture, but he obtains special details and deep teaching, and thus may become a learned and thoroughly reliable scientific man. Second.—In what are known as Exercises or Conversa- tions in the Seminaries, where the student has the opportunity of gleaning information which he cannot do in the ordinary class-room or lecture-hall. Third—In the competition created, by the student in the same University, and that in the University itself, having on many subjects, the choice of a teacher, whose lectures qualify equally for the degree, while there is no one subject in a Faculty which as a preferential course he must take. Fourth.—In the freedom left to the student by his ability to study under men of special repute in their subject at various seats of learning, and yet take his degree at none of those where he studied, but at some other University altogether, while at the same time a very thorough academical training is secured to him if he chooses to avail himself of it. Hifth.—In the regulations existing, and the understanding among the Professors themselves, that they are in office for, and must devote their whole time and energies to, the work of their classes, the benefit of the student, the fame of the University, as well as to the advancement of science and learning, notwithstanding the temptations and inducements to increased incomes or supposed higher social position which other fields of occupation might directly or indirectly offer. In this connection, it may be a surprise to some to learn that in Germany the office of a Professor is considered superior to 24 The University System of Germany. that of a Judge, and thus a Professor has not the temptation to try and secure the position of a Judge. But then the salary of a Judge, even of the Supreme Court in Leipzig, is _ not £1000 per annum, and the average salary of a Provincial Judge is not £500 per annum. Sizth—In the existence of a Minister of Education, and the general anxiety of the State to aid and promote, by grants of money and otherwise, the work in which the University 1s engaged. And further, in the fact of each University being in direct connection with the State through an official specially . appointed for the purpose. rd * Printed by T. and A. ConsTaBLe, Printéts to Her Majesty, at the Edinburgh University Press. re 4 THE PRESENT POSITION ~, % / OF THE — URGE Ale Py IE SERVICE ~ WITH SUGGESTIONS FOR ITS FUTURE ADMINISTRATION BEING THE INTRODUCTORY LECTURE AT THE CLASS OF CIVIL PROCEDURE IN THE LAW COURTS OF SCOTLAND IN EDINBURGH UNIVERSITY 25TH OCTOBER 1886 BY JOHN P. COLDSTREAM, W.S., F.R.S.S.A. LECTURER ON CIVIL PROCEDURE IN THE UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH; EXTRAORDINARY MEMBER, FORMERLY ONE OF THE PRESIDENTS, OF THE JURIDICAL SOCIETY OF EDINBURGH Edinburgh: JAMES THIN, PUBLISHER TO THE UNIVERSITY td 1886 aa PREFACE. SINCE the delivery of the lecture which is contained in the following pages, I have had much approval of its views expressed to me. I therefore issue it to the public, in the hope that it may help to ripen public opinion upon the subjects of which it treats. I will be greatly obliged to any of its readers who may approve of its sentiments, or any of them, by their sending their names and addresses to me, that I may be able to communicate with them if any action seems desirable in a near future. Jd ebe.G. 6 BuckINGHAM TERRACE, EDINBURGH, 15th November 1886. 7 - > ‘ s % » F 7 - re ¥ ve Rar fi fart h a Pilg : Mesh 0° oe A ee The Present Position of the Legal Civil Service. GENTLEMEN,—Nince last I lectured from this place, many changes have come over the country, and changes have occurred in my own life and in my position in regard to this Lectureship. I cannot overlook the fact that I have now ceased to hold a position which in some respects enabled me to discharge the duties of this class very much more satisfactorily than I other- ~ wise could, while my studies and work for it enabled me to fill that position in a more satisfactory manner than I could otherwise have done. Most willingly would I have now been discharging the duties of the office I was obliged to vacate, in the circumstances I will shortly mention, for the sake of this class, as well as my own, but in the wisdom of Her Majesty’s advisers, I am precluded by my recent discharge of public duty from returning to an office which I resigned to enable me to discharge it.* I bow to this decision, and will endeavour to do my best for your interests in other ways, while exerting myself to the utmost to maintain the efficiency of this Lectureship. One decided advantage of freedom from office is that I — have more time for deep and quiet study for your benefit. I cannot regret the step I took in the public * T resigned a Clerkship in the Supreme Court of Scotland to enable me to contest Wigtownshire, in the Ministerial interest, in July 1886. ¥ 6 THE PRESENT POSITION OF interest and for my country’s good. It has been my aim in life to discharge public duty and to follow my view of what I deemed was right, irrespective of private convenience and consequences, and often at self- sacrifice ; and if, having received public appointments for public services, I could not, at the call of duty and at the urgent request of the representatives of the constituency interested, and with the approbation and help of my party, and when no other could be found to go into the breach, make the necessary sacrifice, I would not have been worthy of the name of man, if I had not done what I did, and fought a battle, though unsuccessful, for a cause which I believe to be righteous, and for my party, to which I have ever been attached, and which, in the past, has not left me altogether forgotten. But the result of the incidents to which I have referred is, that I am now left free and unfettered to do what I can in the interests of the profession to which we belong. It has ever been my desire to see our profession attaining a better position in all its departments— academical, official, and otherwise. Much no doubt may be done and has been done outside the walls of St Stephen’s, but the finishing and operative strokes to the work must, as a rule, be accomplished there. Had a distinguished lawyer not given such strokes by the University Act of 1858, I would not have been lecturing within these walls. We outsiders can to some extent form public opinion as to improvements—we can suggest or frame Acts of Parliament, or their clauses, and very necessary it is that these should be framed by the lawyers, who will afterwards have to carry them out or advise as to their THE LEGAL CIVIL SERVICE. 7 provisions; but it is the lawyers in Parliament who can accomplish the passing of measures of Reform, and it therefore appears to me indispensable that there should be many more Scotch working lawyers in Parlia- ment now than there are; and in this connection let me say that I think it a shame to, and a reflection upon, our country that we are obliged to have so many ~ English barristers and other English men representing Scotland. We cannot wonder if Scotch legislation is neglected if we do not send Scotchmen to Parlia- ment to attend to it. There are many reforms in connection with our profession waiting to be accomplished, but perhaps of all such, that of the position of the legal civil service requires the early consideration of the Legislature. To that reform, had I been in Parliament now, it would Legal Reform have been my aim to lend a helping hand necessary. by practical work. As an outsider I can only bring the question before the youthful legal mind, in the not unfounded hope that some of my hearers or readers, in a future not remote, may be among those who can be the means of accomplishing what I perhaps can only suggest. At the present moment, no doubt, a Commission is sitting, or will shortly sit, to consider the duties of the Civil Service Various civil servants of the Crown, and Commission. ypon their report reform may follow; but J am not aware that it is a part of their functions to consider whether the system on which our legal civil service is based, and whether the source of the appoint- ment of these officers is the best’ that could be devised, and yet I don’t know why these matters should not have formed part of the instructions to the Royal Commission. - B 8 THE PRESENT POSITION OF I observe that the duties of the Commission are said to be so onerous that it will require some years for their discharge. Why, then, could we not have a special Commission for Scotland? And in this connec- tion I would like to know if there are any Scotchmen upon it? and if not, why ? Now it is not at all unreasonable that from this University should go out a by no means uncertain voice on the matters to which I have referred; for it University Was a lawyer and a very accomplished and Reform of 1858.eminent jurist who was the means of working great and good changes in our University system, and of changing the source of patronage of many of its chairs. Why not of all, I do not know. In his wisdom—a wisdom whose results have reflected upon him the highest credit—the possibilities and facilities of new teaching in this University are vastly increased, its administration has been entirely changed, and the patronage of many of its chairs was transferred from one body, representing very much one class, to a body specially elected from various public bodies by peculiar fitness to decide upon such matters. These changes I believe have been beneficial. They were called for by the circumstances of the day, and are in consonance with the public opinion of the hour. The legal profession is that from which very many of the most lucrative appointments of the State are recruited. These appointments are salaried from the public funds, and therefore, of course, it is right that we, the public, should see that their patronage is vested in the best source, and it is specially right that you, young lawyers, who, five, ten, twenty, or forty years after this may aspire to a public appointment, are now satisfied that THE LEGAL CIVIL SERVICE. 9 the patronage of the appointment is rightly vested, or if not, that you lend a helping hand in having it properly placed. In all there are certainly upwards of 250 offices open to the legal profession in Scotland, with salaries varying from £100 to nearly £5000 per annum. These appointments include the highest and most important legal offices in Scotland. They must be filled by some one, and it is necessary that most, if not all, should be filled by well-trained and accomplished lawyers—by men of experience and special knowledge in many cases, by men of character in all. On their Conditions of D&lNg properly and efficiently filled depends efficiency for the regular working of the legal machinery pe eine alleite parts, and the improper occupancy of an office may cause trouble and annoyance to the public at large, and retard or disarrange the working of the harmonious whole. Some men are, as a term of reproach, called office seekers, and all their actions are attributed to motives having this object in view; and yet why should a man be blamed for aspiring to fill a position, his proper administration in which may be of incalculable benefit to the profession to which he belongs, and to his fellow men at large, as well as to himself and family? But while this is true, it is also true that men desiring office, and competent for office, should be placed in this position, that they shall not be obliged to crouch or cringe to, be officious to, or curry favour with the source of patronage, nor be related to, or a friend of, or be a member of the club, clique, or ring of the powers that be. Nor should the source of patronage be in this position, that in the exercise of his office or profession he must either, when- holding Office seekers. 10 THE PRESENT POSITION OF office or aspiring to it, plead before those, and be oppos- ing those who may depend upon his opinion for pro- motion or appointment ; and lastly, there should, in all departments of the legal civil service, be the means provided by which, irrespective of the favour, caprice, Possibilities OY prejudice of man, the man who has once of promotion. his foot on the ladder shall be able to rise to the head of his department, without the probability of a man, for friendship’s sake or political services, being placed over him. From the number of legal appointments you will see, then, that the possibilities before all of you are many and great, and you will consider the responsibility before a chosen few of you may be enormous, when you remember who at the present time has virtually the Patronage of Patronage of most of these offices. They legal offices. are mostly, if not all, in the patronage or gift of the Crown, as advised by the Home Secretary or Secretary for Scotland, the former of whom, at all events, is advised in most cases solely by the Lord Advocate for Scotland for the time being; so that virtually, though, perhaps, not technically or formally, the whole legal patronage of Scotland is in the hands of one or twomen. Of course, gentlemen, if you are of opinion that it is best that such an enormous amount of public patronage should be in one of either of two men —bhe he ever so wise, ever so discriminating, ever so strong, ever so free from outside influence—then, of Cea conse: let it so remain; but if not, and system of you are of opinion that, as in other depart- patronage. ments, it is thought best to vest patronage in the hands of more than one person, or one particular body of a particular class of men, then by all means use your influence—and every one has influence—to have it transferred. THE LEGAL CIVIL SERVICE. iby I am not, and I am sure you are not, among those who think that because a thing has been, therefore it should be. I am not here to say that the patronage of public offices has ever been well or badly exercised. In the gift of all public appointments, by whomsoever made, there will always be grumblers among those who are the disappointed applicants or their sup- porters; but what the public has to consider is what are the best safeguards to secure that for a particular office the best man is chosen; and the public is ever the better occasionally to consider whether the modus operands of our forefathers is best, or whether a better cannot be devised. We are told that in the multitude of counsellors there is wisdom; and if this be so, surely it applies equally to the wisdom required for the patronage of an office as for the framing of an Act of Parliament. At all events, the patronage being vested in more than one person, the various claims and qualifications of a candidate must necessarily be more widely canvassed, and considered, free from the prejudices of one mind alone, than they are under the one-man _ system. Under the present system, it may be that the virtual patron has even to consider his own promotion, and it certainly would hardly be in human nature, in most Defects of one- C288, were he to prefer another to him- man system. self, and yet it might be that there were others much better qualified, with greater knowledge and more experience, for the duties of the office; but who is there to judge of that when he has the ball at his foot, and by custom is entitled to refusal of office ? We all know, too, that blood is thicker than water, and so, again, the temptation to appoint a relative or connection might prevent the appointment-of better 12 THE PRESENT POSITION OF qualified men; or, it may be, that men who have rendered personal service to the virtual patrons, or helped them to occupy the position by thei patronage or efforts in the past, are preferred to those who by their diligence in office deserve the position; or, again, the appoint- ment may be made on account of particular, and it may be eminent, political or other public services, to the prejudice of a man skilled as a lawyer and pro- foundly read in legal lore. This last ground no doubt has much to commend it, because in many cases it is the only way the country has from its public funds to mark its appreciation of and gratitude for public services. But last, the greatest evil of all in the present system is that the best man for a vacant office is he who is an eminent and learned member of the political party who for the time being is in opposition.