at iM WSS FoR dre RR ee tte ARG AAS : ak LAF : f eee f NS SS : ww : the ht he tie) tN “ * ‘ ; PY. SONSN Hea Oe : 4 om, ‘ SOs WAS ALILAL PSP? 44 Lipa PANE AAA, xs iicea~ suk Bh bau aR ATRL 83 Se ee Qrens On ages te trp pe ery ’ ‘ a o. dine 8 > ; ee sien gy negra ene emee gen rt toa aay pg teen ee mn ppeteredenesh uli’ sypetrhanerenaryen Mevesteihieiqveret Hh aee MPL inner Rate i : & Z. pe =n | ‘pater inere Wee GAR HSB Lesa LIBRARY OF Vol. fll _‘Ulinois Industrial University, CHAMPAIGN, ILLINOIS. 26\64 4is-Books are not to be Taken! from the Library Room. Wa THE HISTORY OF ENGLAND, FROM THE INVASION OF JULIUS CESAR TO THE END OF THE REIGN OF GEORGE IL.» BY HUME AND SMOLLETT. WITH THE CONTINUATION, FROM THE ACCESSION OF GEORGE III. TO THE ACCESSION OF QUEEN VICTORIA. BY THE REV. 7. 8. HUGHES, B.D. LATE CANON OF PETERBOROUGH. ALSO COPIOUS NOTES, THE AUTHOR’S LAST CORRECTIONS, IMPROVEMENTS, AND ENLARGEMENT. Gith Historical Allustrations, Autographs, and Portruits. ANEW EDITION. Vout. XVII. LONDON : GEORGE BELL, 186 FLEET STREET, 1855. ” and in proportion as «© Histories,’ says Lord Bacon, “make wise men: their minds are influenced by a natural love of their country, so must they feel a desire to become familiar with the most authentic account of its crigin, its progress towards civilization, and the circumstances leading to its present importance in the scale of nations. LONDON : PRINTED BY W. CLOWES AND. SONS, STAMFORD STREET AND CHARING CROSS, THE HISTORY OF ENGLAND, FROM THE ACCESSION OF GEORGE III. TO THE ACCESSION OF QUEEN VICTORIA. BY THE REY. T. 8. HUGHES, B.D. LATE CANON OF PETERBOROUGH. ALSO COPIOUS NOTES, THE AUTHOR’S LAST CORRECTIONS, IMPROVEMENTS, AND ENLARGEMESPS Se, j/ 7 Glith Historical llnstrations, Autographs, wd Portraits. AINEW EDITION. Vou. VIL LONDON: GEORGE BELL, 186 FLEET STREET. 1855. . Sages: Lat Ad be r ‘ | i Me v ‘~. 306 HISTORY OF ENGLAND. CH. LXVI. CHAPTER LXVI. GEORGE IV. (conrinvep.)—1829. Agitations in Ireland—Election of Mr. O’Connell for Clare—Difi-. culties of the cabinet— Determination of the government to con- cede the catholic claims—Opening of parliament—Suppression of the catholic association—Rejection of Mr, Peel at Oxford— Debates and passing of the emancipation bill—Disfranchisement of the Irish forty-shilling freeholders—Financial statements— Motion for parliamentary reform—Prorogation of parliament— Affairs of the continent—Agricultural and commercial distress —State of affairs in Ireland—Conflagration of York Minster— Opening of new Fleet market and Post-office—New police— Meeting of parliament in 1830—Distress of the nation denied by ministers—Speeches, &c., on occasion of the address—Mo- tions for inquiry, &c.—Debates on reductions and taxation, &c. —Committee on East Indian company’s charter—Debate on the currency—The budget—Beer bill—Reform of parliament— Debates on subjects connected with it—Bill for amending the law of libel—Alterations in courts of justice—Illness of the king—Bill to authorise a stamp for the sign manual—Death ef George IV. In Ireland the recommendation of the late lord-lieutenant was strictly followed ; and when his successor, the duke of Northumberland, arrived in Dublin, he found agitation per- vading the whole country : Brunswick clubs, despairing of any effectual aid from government, were beginning to buckle on their armor, and take the field against the new order of liberators ; while the denunciations of both parties, breathing defiance and revenge, augured nothing less than the horrors of civil war. The situation of the prime minister now became one of great and peculiar difficulty : the whole tenor of his political life, as well as that of his principal supporters, had been marked by hostility to the catholic claims; every indi- vidual having distinctly pledged himself to resist them; grounding his declarations, not on circumstances which might change, but on the nature of the Romish church, which abhors the very notion of change: if the duke therefore saw reasen to alter his own opinions, he would naturally find much A.D. 1829. GEORGE IV. 307 difficulty in producing a similar change in those of honorable, disinterested, independent members of the legislature; nor would he find the sovereign more tractable ; since his reluctance to yield on this point was deep-rooted and vehement: it is well known, that to obtain his majesty’s consent cost the premier months of management, vigilance, and perseverance ; and probably nothing but that indolence and love of ease, which a dissolution of the ministry would have interrupted, overcame the repugnace he had ever manifested to entertain this question ; in the meantime, O’Connell’s election for Clare, the disturbances which afflicted Ireland, the efforts of a large party in England, and the delay of public business, which a continual agitation of this subject in parliament occasioned, made it necessary for his grace to decide on some mode of action. His choice was threefold; either to fall back on old tory principles, and take his ground, as at Waterloo, with a determination never to yield—or to grant emancipation with a free and liberal hand—or, lastly, to retire from the helm of state for a season, and permit a whig government to carry the measure. It may be truly alleged, that to put off con- cession much longer, without drawing the sword and re-con- quering Ireland, was impossible; and even how such a conquest could be obtained against an increasing majority in the house of commons, with more than a third of the nation favorable to emancipation, and another third tired of the subject, or insensible to its result, is very difficult to conceive: - there can be little doubt, however, that the latter course would have been at once the wisest and most honorable; for it was hardly fair to steal the crown of victory from those statesmen, who, during the whole of their political career, had ably and eloquently advocated the catholic cause; nor was it prudent in his grace to subject his own party not only to imputations and aspersions, but ultimately to disunion, by the course which he pursued. Having determined, however, to carry the question by his own might, he first gave intimation of this intention in the king’s speech, delivered by commission on the fifth of Feb- ruary: the suppression of the catholic association was there alluded to as a measure which ought to precede any review of the condition of Ireland, or any consideration of the disabilities under which Roman catholics were laboring. The advocates of exclusion, perceiving at once the tendency of this recom- mendation, complained of treacherous desertion and surprise, charging the duke with a perfidious concealment of his 308 HISTORY OF ENGLAND. CH. LXVI. designs up to the last moment; while they loaded Mr. Peel and Mr. Goulburn, men distinguished as Irish secretaries by their anti-catholic sentiments, with the most bitter execrations, on account of their supposed apostacy. On the tenth, a bill was introduced by the former of these gentlemen, to augment the powers of government, for the purpose of suppressing the association ; and this passed without opposition; for although its provisions were somewhat arbitrary in their nature, the friends of the Romanists voted in favor of it, as part of a measure intended to terminate in emancipation: the associa- tion, however, rendered all such enactments unnecessary, by announcing its own dissolution before the bill was complete. On the fifth of March, for which day a call of the house of commons had been ordered, Mr. Peel moved that they should go into committee respecting the laws which imposed dis- abilities on the Roman catholics; but he no longer rose as member for the university of Oxford: that station, from which Mr. Canning had been rejected, Mr. Peel had reached and retained by his uncompromising hostility to the catholic claims : actuated therefore by the most honorable feelings, he resigned his trust into the hands of those from whom he had received it, before he advocated a measure which they conscientiougly abhorred : the only matter of surprise is, that he should have incurred the mortification of certain defeat, by consenting to be put in nomination, with a view to re-election, by a small party of his adherents. Mr. Peel began by stating, that he rose, as one of the king’s ministers, to vindicate the advice which a united cabinet had given to his majesty, and submit to the house measures for carrying such recommendation into effect: he was aware of the difficulties with which the subject was surrounded, in- creased as they were by the relation in which he himself stood to the question ; but having come to the sincere conviction, that the time had arrived when an amicable adjustment of the disputed claims would be accompanied with less danger than any other course that could be suggested, he was prepared to act on that conviction; unchanged by any expression of contrary sentiments, however general or deep; unchanged by the forfeiture of political confidence, or by the heavy loss of private friendship. He had long felt, that with a house of commons favorable to catholic emancipation, his position as a minister opposed to it, was untenable; and he had more than once intimated his desire to resign office, and thus remove one obstacle to a settlement of the question: he had done so on A.D. 1829. GEORGE IV. 309 the present occasion; though at the same time he notified to the duke of Wellington, that, seeing how the current of public opinion lay, he was ready to sacrifice consistency or private friendship, and to support the measure, provided it were undertaken on principles from which no danger to the pro- testant establishment need be apprehended: he was aware that he was expected to make out a case for this change of policy ; and he was now about to submit to the house a state- ment, which proved to his own mind, with the force of demon- stration, that ministers were imperatively called on to recom- mend the measure, however inconsistent it might appear with their former tenets. The argument, by which this case was to be made out, said Mr. Peel, resolved itself into the following propositions: first, matters could not remain in their present state; the evil of divided councils being so great, that something must be done, and a government must be formed with a common opinion on the subject: secondly, a united government once constituted must do one of two things; it must either grant farther political rights to the catholics, or recall those which they already possess: but thirdly, to deprive them of what they already have, would be impossible; or, at least, would be infinitely more mischievous than to grant them more; and therefore no case remained to be adopted, except that of con- cession. Having illustrated these propositions at great length, and with great ability, Mr. Peel proceeded to develop the course which it was intended to pursue. The principle or basis of the projected measures was the abolition of civil distinctions, and the establishment of equal political rights; with a few special exceptions: the chief of these were the continued disqualifica- tion of Roman catholics from holding the offices of lord chan- cellor, or keeper of the great seal, or lord lieutenant of Ireland ; from receiving any appointments in protestant universities or colleges ; and from exercising any right of presentation, as lay patrons, to the benefices and dignities of the church of England : an oath also was to be exacted from all who should become members of parliament, civil officers of state, or members of corporations, by which they were to promise allegiance to the crown, as well as to abjure every design of subverting the pro- testant establishment in church and state. To these indispen- sable provisions some others less important were added; such as prohibitions against carrying the insignia of office to places of Roman catholic worship; and against the assumption, by 310 HISTORY OF ENGLAND. CH. LXVI. prelates of that communion, of the same episcopal titles as those which belong to the church of England: also certain precautions against the increase of monastic institutions, parti- cularly that of the jesuits, intended chiefly to allay the alarm still existing in some minds against that once formidable order : a more effective and important check, however, on the conse- quences which might result from admitting Roman catholics in Ireland to civil power, was meditated in a law for raising the qualification of the elective franchise, in counties, from forty ‘shillings to ten pounds; by which means, that privilege would be limited to persons really possessed of property, and less liable to be misled by the priests. The motion was not very powerfully opposed ; the principal speakers against it being sir Robert Inglis and Mr. Estcourt, ‘the two members for Oxford university ; the former of whom had been Mr. Peel’s successful competitor for its representa- tion. The chief argument used, was an assumption, that the grant of equal privileges to Roman catholics would be the destruction of our protestant establishment. With regard to Ireland, it was said, that discord and agitation were not new features in the condition of that country ; that they were not a result of the penal laws; nor would they cease on the removal of civil disabilities. With respect to the divided state of the cabinet, it was asked, why did not the duke of Wellington and Mr. Peel, instead of changing their own line of policy, rather attempt to bring over their colleagues to their views ;— especially as the right honorable gentleman confessed that he still thought there was danger in granting catholic emancipa- tion? Against the fear of civil war, it was said, that reliance ought to have been placed on public opinion and the moral determination of the British people: at best, too, the evil day would only be postponed, and resistance to ulterior struggles rendered more difficult. Ministers were also met with taunts on the intimidated spirit from which concession was wrung, and which was rendered evident in their ridiculous provisions, called securities, If Mr. Peel, it was said, and other newly- made converts, thought they could no longer resist, because they had not a majority in the house of commons, why did they refuse to accept a majority? why had not parliament been dissolved ? such a course was right at any time, when a measure strongly affecting the constitution was contemplated ; but it was peculiarly necessary in the present instance. The marquis of Blandford even maintained, that if the house sanc- tioned the present audacious invasion of our constitution, it A.D. 1829, GEORGE IV. 311 would break the trust reposed in it by the people of England, who were surprised with the unexpected announcement now made by ministers; constituted as the house was, it did not express that just alarm which was felt by the people for the safety of protestant institutions. The motion, on the other hand, was supported by sir G. Murray, colonial secretary, Mr. C. Grant, Mr. North, and Mr. Huskisson ; while the opposition members who spoke con- tented themselves with general observations of approbation and congratulation. The positions were repeated and enforced, that the pacification of Ireland was necessary to the safety of the empire; and that without emancipation pacification could not be effected ; since all classes had identified themselves with this question, and Ireland had thence fallen into a state in which it could not possibly remain: it must now either advance or recede ; for every tie which held society together in that island had been loosened or broken: a certain state of things, indeed, not deserving the name of society, might be maintained by means of the sword; but such an one as would bave no analogy to the British constitution. The only inti- midation, to which ministers could be accused of yielding, was the fear of continuing such a state of affairs, and aggravating all its evils by gradual accumulation, instead of restoring mutual good-will and the peaceful empire of the law: no other inti- midation existed: none was felt in Ireland; for what was the force of an unarmed multitude, when measured against that of the state? But when it was considered, what effects might arise from disunion—since a spirit of resentment was growing up, which excited men against each other,—there appeared a prospect of intimidation, such as did not admit of contempt ; for no army could avail to put down a system of: private outrage and revenge: the protestant body, at least the body which arrogated to itself that title, knew the state of enthral- ment under which they had held the catholics; and that an unarmed multitude must submit: but were we to destroy one part of the people by rousing and inflaming the other? It was rather the duty of government to protect the whole, to ensure for them the greatest degree of protection, and to give them all the privileges which they had a right to enjoy. Regarding a dissolution of parliament, it was said, that the present house was as capable of discussing this. question as any which had sat for the last twenty-five years: it was in fact a question fit for consideration at all times, when brought forward by any member; and was particularly so when it 312 HISTORY OF ENGLAND. CH. LXvI. came with a recommendation from the throne, as necessary for the peace and safety of the united kingdom. A dissolution of parliament, Mr. Peel observed, must leave the catholic asso- ciation and the elective franchise in Ireland just as they were ; for the common law was inadequate to suppress them: then, whatever might be the majority returned for Great Britain, Ireland would return eighty or ninety members in the interest of the association, forming a compact and united band, against the force of which it would be impossible to carry on the local government of the country. It had been said, indeed, increase the army, or the constabulary force; but a greater force could not be employed there. He would state one simple fact: above five-sixths of the infantry had been engaged in aiding the government of Ireland; not so much by repressing violence, as by interposing between two hostile parties: under such circumstances, a re-action must ensue, which would gradually lead to this alternative; namely, to a plan of narrowing the civil government, and resting it on the apex, instead of its proper position on the base. It was also denied that there was anything so peculiar, in the nature of the proposed mea- sure, as to require a special appeal to the people; since it was incorrectly called a violation of the constitution: that consti- tution was not to be sought for solely in the acts of 1688: its foundations had been laid much earlier—laid by catholic hands, and cemented by catholic blood: but even taking the compact of 1688 to be the foundation of our rights and liberties, the most diligent opponent of the catholic claims would be unable to point out in the bill of rights a single clause by which the exclusion of Roman catholics from seats in parliament was declared to be a fundamental or indispensable principle of the British constitution: that bill merely regarded the liberties guaranteed to the people, and the protection of the throne from the intrusion of popery. ‘To the objection, that the measure contemplated was an unconditional conces- sion, without adequate security for the protestant establishment, it was answered,—that principles of exclusion were not the kind of securities to which the established religion trusted, or ought to trust: the real securities of protestantism would re- main, unaffected by this bill, in the unalterable attachment of the people; who, though divided on minor subjects, would unite in resisting the errors of popery: the combined force of habits and circumstances was not so easily to be shaken: the house also, it was said, should look at that great security which it would derive from the generous gratitude of the Irish. A.D. 1829. GEORGE IV. 313 Neither were the actual securities devised so nugatory as they had been represented: Mr. Peel said, that when he looked at the petitions sent from all parts of the country, he could not help being struck with one extraordinary coincidence ;—these petitions united in praying for three special securities—the extinction of the catholic association, the correction of the elective franchise in Ireland, and the abolition of the order of jesuits: now the bill which he proposed happened to contain all these securities; and if the necessity of obtaining them were so great as the petitioners contended, let him be answered this question :—would the protestants ever have had the least chance of procuring them, unless his majesty had recommended the disabilities of the Roman catholics to be taken into consi- deration, with a view to adjustment ? On a division, the motion was carried by a majority of 348 votes against 160; which preponderance not only made mani- fest the fate of the question in the commons, but indicated an overwhelming weight of ministerial influence, to be exerted, probably with no less success, in the house of peers: resolu- tions, proposed by Mr. Peel in the committee, were imme- diately agreed to; and a bill founded on them was introduced, and read for the first time, on the tenth of March. On the seventeenth, the honourable secretary moved the second reading of this bill; when he was strongly attacked on the desertion of his principles by sir Edward Knatchbull, one of the members for Kent. Mr. Goulburn admitted that he had adopted new opinions on this subject, because nothing else could possibly be done in the present state of: Ireland; and contended, that the measure proposed was calculated to give more complete ascendency to the protestant establishment, by diminishing the irritation, and removing the prejudices of its opponents: this method however of giving permanent security to the protestant establishment, by granting political power to the church of Rome, was strongly condemned by Mr. G. Bankes, who, declared that it was but a stepping-stone for the catholics to reach everything they might desire. Lord Pal- merston and sir George Murray supported the measure with much eloquence and animation; but the speech which on this occasion claimed and deserved the greatest attention from the house, was that of Mr. Sadler, a man of distinguished abilities, rare honesty, and benevolent disposition, who had lately been returned to parliament for the borough of Newark, by the duke of Newcastle’s interest. Mr. Sadler not only argued at great length against the principle of the bill, and its dangerous ten- 314 HISTORY OF ENGLAND. CH. LXVI. dency toward the protestant church; but showed its utter futility in remedying the evils which oppressed Ireland, or repaying the wrongs which she had suffered from so many generations. ‘Ireland,’ said he, ‘degraded, deserted, op- pressed, and pillaged, is turbulent; and you listen to the selfish recommendations of her agitators: you seek not to know, or, knowing, you wilfully neglect, her real distresses : if you can calm the agitated surface of society, you heed not that fathomless depth of misery, sorrow, and distress, the troubled waves of which may still heave unseen and disre- garded ; and this, forsooth, is patriotism! Ireland asks of you bread, and you offer to her catholic emancipation ; and this, I presume, is construed to be the taking into consideration, as his majesty recommended, the whole state of Ireland.’ Mr. Sadler made an eloquent apostrophe to the memory of Mr. Canning, declaring his own repentance in having aided the too successful attempts to hunt down that illustrious victim ;— aman, whom England and the world recognised as an orna- ment ; whose eloquence was, in these days at least, unrivalled ; while the energies of his capacious mind, stored with knowlege and elevated by genius, were devoted to the service of his country. ‘This,’ said the honorable member, ‘ was the states- man, with whom the present ministers could not act, for a reason which vitiates their present resolutions, and furnishes the most disgraceful page in the annals of our country; but peace to his memory! my humble tribute is paid when it can be no longer heard or regarded; when it is drowned’ by the voice of interested adulation, now poured into the ears of the living. He fell; but his character is rescued: it rises and triumphs over that of his surviving,—what shall I call them ? Let their own consciences supply the hiatus.’ Mr. R. Grant maintained, that it was in vain to speak of applying to the evils of Ireland such cures as it was supposed might be found in the establishment of poor-laws, or the com- pulsory residence of absentees: even if the expediency of these measures were assumed, this was not the proper time for their application: the question at present was, how existing discon- tent might be allayed—how the raging pestilence might be stopped. It was only after this had been done, that preven- tives could be rationally suggested ; for although the evils of Ireland had been traced to many causes, these causes themselves, even where they existed, were but the effects of political dis- tinctions, founded on the difference of religious creeds: the house had been told, for instance, to seek for the source of such A.D. 1829. GEORGE IV. 315 evils in the local oppression practised in Ireland, rather than in the general restrictive laws: of local oppression, no doubt, plenty had always existed; but it had ever florished, while the followers of one creed were armed with power to oppress the adherents of another deprived of all power. The same mis- chiefs too, it was said, had existed before the reformation, when there was but one religious faith in Ireland: true; and they existed, because even then the same system of excluding the natives from political power had been long followed, though on different grounds. Of all declaimers against the bill, no one was so furious as sir Charles Wetherell, who had refused to draw it up in his official capacity as attorney-general : still in office, under a minister who was understood to have made implicit submission to his word of command the tenure by which office was to be held, and knowing that nothing but the difficulty of supplying his place prevented his discharge,! he furiously hurled on the measure, its framers, and its advocates, fragments of the most frantic declamation and personal hostility. Such yituperation called up Mr. Peel; who, after complaining of this outrageous conduct, reverted to the grounds on which he had first proposed the bill ; again urging the state of Ireland, and the absolute secessity of doing something; the inability of his opponents to do any thing better, though they vehe- mently opposed the measure now offered ; the impossibility of any government standing, which should set itself, on avowed principles, against concession ; and the folly of treating the question as one which had any connexion with religion: the catholics were never excluded, at any time, on account of their religious creed, but for a supposed deficiency of civil worth ; and the religious test was applied, not to detect the worship of saints, or any other tenet of their faith, but merely to discover whether they were Roman catholics; to discover, not the re- ligionist, but the bad and intriguing subject: he complained grievously, that an unfair application had been made of his unhappy phrase, that the proposed measure was ‘a breaking in upon the constitution of 1688 ;? by which he meant no more than that there would be an alteration in the words of the bill of rights; and if this were to break in upon the constitution, 1 In the event of the attorney-general’s office becoming vacant, ministers could not pass over sir Nicholas Tindal, the solicitor- general, while his elevation would have occasioned a vacancy in the representation of the university of Cambridge; and after the eine of Mr. Peel at Oxford, they did not wish to run the risk of another. — 316 HISTORY OF ENGLAND. CH. LXVI. then had such ‘ breaking in’ frequently taken place. After feelingly lamenting the loss of private friendship and of public confidence, which he had sustained by proposing these mea- sures, the honorable secretary expressed his conviction that the time would come, though he might not live to see it, when full justice would be done by men of all parties to the motives which had actuated him; when this question would be fully settled, and others would see that he had no other alternative than to act as he had acted. The result of the division was 353 for the second reading of the bill, and 180 against it: during its progress through the committee, several strong amendments were proposed, but all were rejected ; and on the thirtieth of March, it was read a third time and passed. Next day, Mr. Peel, with an unusually large escort of members, presented the bill.at the bar of the lords, where it was read for the first time, on the same evening, without op- position. Here its opponents cherished some hopes that its progress might be ultimately arrested: but they were destined to be disappointed; for a great number of peers, who had hitherto opposed the measure, were now either satistied that the moment had arrived when the claims of the Roman catholics could no longer be resisted with safety, or were at least prepared to sacrifice their opinions to ministerial dictation. The second reading was moved by the duke of Wellington, on the second of April, ina speech replete with nervous eloquence and comprehensive reasoning: nor did the character of his grace ever shine with greater lustre than when he gave utter- ance to that solemn, pathetic, and beautiful declaration, which had so striking an effect on the present occasion. ‘ It has been my fortune,’ he said, ‘to have seen much war,—more than most men; I have been constantly engaged in active duties of the military profession from boyhood until I am grown grey ; my life has been passed in familiarity with scenes of death and human suffering ; circumstances have placed me in countries where the war was internal, between opposite parties of the same nation: and rather than a country I loved should be visited with the calamities which I have seen, with the un- utterable horrors of a civil war,—I would run any risk; I would make any sacrifice ; 1 would freely lay down my life.’ The archbishop of Canterbury, dreading the ulterior designs of the papists more than any consequences which might result from a refusal of their claims, moved an amendment, that the bill should be read a second time that day six months: the debate was continued by adjournment through four successive A.D. 1829. GEORGE IV. 317 nights: the spiritual lords who spoke, beside the mover of the amendment, were the archbishops of York and Armagh, the bishops of London, Salisbury, Darhach and Oxford; all of whom opposed the bill, except the last, whose position was peculiarly painful ; for whether it was, that he had been con- vinced by the arguments of his friend and pupil, Mr. Peel, or that a sense of gratitude induced him to lend aid to his minis- terial patrons,—he had to refute his own powerful speech, made in the preceding session; and this change of sides, but more especially the defence of his altered sentiments, subjected him to the bitterest reproaches of party spirit. Among tem- poral peers, the principal defenders of this bill were the lord chancellor, the marquis of Lansdowne, viscount Goderich, the earl of Westmoreland, and lord Plunkett: but no one had a more difficult task to perform than lord chancellor Lyndhurst ; for up to the time he had been distinguished by his learned, earnest, and eloquent refutations of all plans for concession ; which plans were now repeated, and which refutations he also was called on to confute: even so late as. last year, he had declared his conviction, that emancipation, though accompanied by weighty securities, was pregnant with danger to our consti- tution and establishment; and he now declared his equally conscientious conviction, that emancipation, without any se- curities at all, would be conducive to the safety and prosperity of that same constitution and establishment. The marquis of Anglesey, who, three months before, had been recalled from his government of Ireland because he held out hopes of con- cession to its catholic population, now entered the ministerial phalanx which combated for that measure ; insisting principally on the military points of view in which the question ought to be placed. ‘ Every man,’ he said ‘ acquainted with the state of Ireland, would agree with him, that in a time of profound peace, under our exclusive laws, 25,000 men was but a scanty garrison for that country ; but in the event of war, or even the rumor of war, that would be an improvident government which did not immediately add to it a force of 15,000 men: 40,000 indeed would scarcely be sufficient under such circumstances, It could not be questioned, that both France and America wished to do us injury ; and in case of collision with either of those powers, the first object of both would be to place arms in the hands of the discontented Irish: he argued on the sup- position that the exclusive laws were in existence ; for if not, those arms would not be received; or if received, would be turned against the donors. Suppose, however, that we were 318 HISTORY OF ENGLAND. CH. LXVI. actually at war, having the European powers combined against us—a contingency by no means unlikely ; it would then be madness in any administration not to throw at least 70,000 men into Ireland: but let this bill pass; and then, if war should be declared, we should be able within six weeks to raise in that country 50,000 able-bodied and willing-hearted men, who would find their way to any quarter of the globe, whither we might choose to direct them.’ The duke of Richmond, the earls of Winchelsea, Harewood, Mansfield, Falmouth, and Enniskillen all strongly opposed the bill; while the chief justice, lord Tenterden, declared against it, as a violation of our constitution, and as threatening ruin to our protestant church, which he valued, not only for the purity of its doctrines, but because, of all churches that ever existed, it was most favourable to civil and religious liberty: neither did he see any countervailing benefit likely to be gained by so fatal a sacrifice. After ably commenting on the various acts made to exclude papists from parliament, as well as from vari- ous offices of the state, his lordship declared his opinion, that the anticipated tranquillity of Ireland, as a result of this bill, would never be realised. Earl Grey spoke at great length ; repeating the argument, that an exclusion of catholics had not originally formed any part of our protestant government, since they had been found in parliament from the reign of Elizabeth down to that of Charles II.; that the exclusion, when it did come, was adopted to guard against political dangers of a tem- porary nature, which had long since disappeared ; that it formed no essential part of the revolution settlement, or of the bill of rights; also that the coronation oath was never intended to restrain the king from consenting to such alterations as parlia- ment in its wisdom might enact: he also entered at great length into that important part of the question, which related to its bearing on the act of union with Scotland. As to the effect of this bill on the state of Ireland, he would not venture to say that it would at once bestow tranquillity, and remove all dan- gers; but he was sure that, without such a measure, it was impossible to have tranquillity, or to be free from peril: by the exclusive system they had produced more than one rebellion in Ireland, to be extinguished in blood ;—but had tranquillity ensued? By no means: on the contrary, the condition of that country had been growing worse and worse every year, requir- ing a large military establishment to keep the people obedient to the laws, even in a state of peace. Was this the mode, he asked, of making Ireland a useful portion of the empire? Was A.D. 1829. GEORGE IV, 319 this the way we should be preparing for war? But it was urged—if you pass this bill, catholic ascendency is virtually established on the ruins of the protestant church: that church unfortunately was placed in a situation which could not be freed from difficulties of one sort or another ; the great obstacle to its triumph had always been, that it had never been the church of more than a small minority of the Irish people; and that it had been so, was, in his opinion, a consequence of those very laws which they now sought to repeal: take them away, and the number of its disciples would immediately increase ; not from the spirit of conversion, for any open attempt in that way would be most impolitic, but from its superior reason, and its more wholesome tenets: which would come more fairly into play, as soon as it should be relieved from that invidious situation in which it now stood: take away the false protec- tion of exclusive laws, and superior excellence would prevail in the conflict of argument. Lord Eldon, obeying a general call made to him by the house, spoke at great length, and with evident sincerity, on this important question ; stating his belief, that ministers, who had introduced the bill, were actuated by a sense of duty to their country, though he lamented their conduct: neither could he acquit the duke of Wellington and Mr. Peel of wilfully deceiving the people, and bringing them into a state of apathy, by leading them into a persuasion that no measure of the kind would be brought forward, at least this session. With regard to the latter gentleman, his lordship feelingly observed ;—‘ I mention him without the slightest degree of irritation : and if there be any unfavorable impression on his mind toward me, from thinking, that the old maxim, idem velle atque idem nolle, is the foundation of all trae friendship both in public and private life; I solemnly declare, that I suffered the most excruciating pang I ever endured, when I _ found that I differed on this question from one, whose con- currence in my opinions for the last fifteen years I found the most effective support.’ On lord Lyndhurst, however, the ex-chancellor was more severe; for that noble person had endeavored to excuse his own inconsistency by fixing on lord Eldon a charge of similar frailty. With regard to the measure itself, he did not rest any part of his opposition to it on the terms of the coronation oath; neither would he contend that to alter any of the laws passed at the revolution was beyond the power of parliament: this, however, looking at the thirteenth, twenty-fifth, and thirtieth of Charles II. he main- 320 HISTORY OF ENGLAND, CH. LXV. tained,—that the exclusion from parliament, produced by the last of those statutes, was in conformity with the true con- struction of the acts of 1688, and with the act of union between England and Scotland in the reign of Anne: these, he said, were meant to'be the governing principles of our glorious constitution of 1688, until a strong necessity for altering it should be made apparent. His lordship went on t6 show the futility of the securities demanded, and of the measure itself, as it regarded the tranquillisation of Ireland ; being followed by lord Plunkett, who said, that he had reserved himself for the purpose of hearing the unanswerable arguments against the bill, which lord Eldon’ on former occasions had threatened to produce, whenever this measure came fairly before the house: as that noble lord, however, had brought forth nothing but the ¢pse dixit of his own authority, unsustained either by ingenious argument, by historical deduction, or by appeal to public and authenticated documents, he felt himself so far absolved from the necessity of refuting anticipated arguments, that he would apply his observations more particularly to the position—that this bill was calculated to subvert our protestant constitution: after the noble and learned lord had dilated at great length on this topic, the duke of Wellington closed the debate by a general reply to the principal objections made against the measure. The apprehended danger to the Irish church, from the ad- mission of a few Roman catholics into parliament, he treated as absurd, considering that the throne would be filled by a protestant: besides, a fundamental article of the union between the two countries was an union of the two churches; and it was impossible that any mischief could arise to the Irish branch of this united church, without destroying the union of the kingdoms: he next adverted to the charge of inconsistency brought against himself and his colleagues; observing that he - well knew the sacrifice they would make in adopting this measure, and how much more of popularity they might gain by placing themselves at the head of the protestant league, with the cry of ‘ No popery!’ but they felt, that in so doing, they would have left on the interests of their country a burden to bear all down; and that they would have deserved the hatred and execration of their fellow citizens. With regard to the secresy of which he had been accused, his grace begged leave to say, that his noble and learned friend had done that to him which he complained of others having done to himself; or, to use the words of a right honorable and A.D. 1829. GEORGE IV. 321 mutual friend, ‘he had thrown at him a large paving-stone, instead of a small pebble: in this he had not acted fairly, since he knew how the cabinet was constructed with regard to this question; and could he declare, that the prime minister had a right to say a single word to any person whatever on the measure, until the person most interested of all in the kingdom had consented to his speaking out? Before his lordship accused him of improper secresy, he ought to have known the precise day on which he was permitted to open his mouth: with regard to what had been observed respect- ing a dissolution of parliament, he declared his opinion, that noble lords were mistaken in their notion of the advantages anticipated from such a measure ; and were not aware of the consequences and inconveniences of a dissolution at that par- | ticular time. ‘ But,’ said his grace, ‘ when I knew the state of the elective franchise in Ireland—when I recollected the number of men it took to watch one election that took place there last summer—when I foresaw the consequences which a dissolution would produce on the returns to the house of commons, to say nothing of the risks at each election, and the collisions that might have led to something like a civil war— knowing, I say, all these things, I should have been wanting in duty to my sovereign and to my country had I advised his majesty to dissolve his parliament.’ The second reading was determined by the votes of 217 peers against 112: on the seventh and eighth of April, the bill passed through a com- mittee, in which many amendments were moved, but none carried ; on the tenth, it was read a third time, after another debate, notwithstanding the persevering resistance of its op- ponents; especially of lord Eldon, who fought stoutly to the end; declaring ‘that he would sooner lay down his existence that very night, than awake to the reflection that he had con- sented to an act which would stamp him as a violator of his oath, a traitor to his church, and a traitor to our constitution :’ the third reading was carried by a majority of 213, against 109; three days afterwards, the bill received its final con- firmation in the royal assent, very reluctantly extorted from a sovereign who seems to have given it chiefly to relieve him- self from a troublesome and annoying question.? 2 ‘The universal talk,’ says lord Eldon to his daughter, ‘ is about the manner in which the king, at his levee, received the voters for the catholic question—very uncivilly ; markedly so toward the lords spiritual who so voted—and the civility with which he received the anti-catholic voters, particularly the bishops......consent to the bill ENG. XVI. XY 322 HISTORY OF ENGLAND. CH. LXVI. If any man had fondly imagined that the removal of dis- abilities from Roman catholics would prove an immediate or sufficient cure for the disorders of Ireland, he must either have been very ignorant of the state of the country, or have wilfully deceived himself: protestant ascendency was too deeply and extensively rooted in all its institutions to admit of such a remedy; nor was it likely that the Roman catholics, having acquired means to break their chain, would remain long without trying their efficiency. One fault was, that the measure itself had been gained by agitation, not granted generously as a boon: but no method of granting it would have completely satisfied the Irish ; and all the benefit which ought to have been expected from it, was the allaying of heats, and the assuaging of animosities, until other measures could be introduced, which might have the effect of ameliorating the condition of the country, by establishing such security for life and property, that no person would be afraid to lay out his capital there, or to exert his industry: it is only in the bosom of national tranquillity that national prosperity and wealth can be produced. Kmancipation having been gained, Mr. Peel brought in a bill to disfranchise the Irish forty-shilling freeholders, and raise the qualification to ten pounds: this was part and parcel of the general measure, and it met with no serious opposition even in Ireland; for the association was extinct, the peasantry were tired of the privilege, and the landlords were not very anxious to retain those instruments of bribery and corruption, which had recoiled on themselves: the measure, however, was one of great importance; for it has preserved some balance in the Irish representation, by keeping a portion of it still in the hands of protestant land- owners, and has accordingly been a favorite subject of reproba- tion among agitators of all degrees. ‘The great leader of that class presented himself, on the fifteenth of May, to redeem his pledge, by offering to take his seat for Clare: on the success of this application he had staked his professional reputation, and he attempted to secure it by two pleas: the first resting ouly on a legal quibble, that the act of union, though it forbade a Roman catholic to sit in parliament, imposed no penalties on him for doing so; the second more plausible, as he certainly did; but with a language of reluctance, pain, and misery, which, if it had been represented, would have prevented a great deal of that ratting which carried the measure.—Life, vol. lii. p. 88. A.D. 1829. GEORGE IV, 323 founded on the enactments of the new statute; although this was expressly limited to ‘such persons, professing the Roman catholic religion as should, after its commencement, be returned members of the house of commons.’ Both these pleas were overruled, after long debates, and an elaborate argument of Mr. O’Connell himself at the bar of the house: but if the provision, which excluded the great agitator from his seat, was designed, as report went, in a paltry spirit of hostility against the man, it had no other effect than that of sending him back to be re-elected by his constituents; and inflaming him with resentment against those whom he viewed in the light of persecutors: in place therefore of that gratitude with which all catholics were to receive emancipation, their champion now loaded ministers with the most opprobrious epithets, as men who, having beer false to their own party, could never be true to any other: in a similar spirit, he announced his ulterior design to effect a repeal of the, union by that system of agitation which had already proved so successful ; and this purpose he deliberately followed up by the most inflammatory harangues, and various other methods of popular excitement. Almost the whole interest of this session was absorbed in the one great question. During its discussion in parliament, it occasioned a duel between the duke of Wellington and the earl of Winchelsea; the latter of whom received his adver- sary’s fire; but nobly declining to aim at such a life as that which he had within his power (for he was an extraordinary marksman), he discharged his own pistol in the air. After its final settlement, it produced very important consequences, by driving a large body of ultra tories, through pique, into the ranks of the reformers: these were unjustly indignant at the duke and his satellites for precipitating a measure which could not have been long stayed; since the numerical majority of Irish catholics, inflamed against a dominant minority, was so great, that nothing less than a complete conquest of the country would have kept them in subjection : but how could that conquest have been effected, when a majority of the British hoyse of commons was in favor of emancipation? As the commons of England hold the strings of the purse, how could the sinews of war have been supplied without their concurrence? It may be said perhaps, that resort should have been had to a dissolution of parliament: but it is certain, that this measure had lost its interest with a very large portion of the nation; while not a few were 324 HISTORY OF ENGLAND. CH. LXVI. anxious to close at all hazards a question, which had long dis- turbed tranquillity, and become a serious obstacle to the trans- action of public business: besides, the whigs were a powerful body ; and being, as they would have been, joined by the moderates and every other party, except that of the high church tories, they would inevitably have earried the elections in their favor; so that, as the duke of Wellington observed in his place, there would have been all the hazard of a collision approaching to a civil war, without any probability of a result favorable to the adversaries of emancipation. On the eighth of May, the chancellor of the exchequer opened his budget with the gratifying intelligence, that the revenue of the preceding year had so far exceeded his esti- mate, as to have left a clear surplus of nearly £6,000,000 for the sinking fund: but for the present year, as the house was anxious to abolish the absurd system of defraying the expense of military and naval pensions, or the ‘ dead weight,’ as it was called, by postponing its burdens, he estimated the gross revenue at £51,347,000, and the expenditure at £48 333,593 ; by which means he left only a clear sinking- fund of £3,000,000 for diminishing our public debt. After this financial statement, which produced but little discussion, the prorogation of parliament was preceded by no measure of importance, except an abortive motion for parliamentary reform: it was introduced by the marquis of Blandford, one of those members of the ultra tory faction, who, in disgust at the conduct of the present ministry and parliament, had been converted into reformers, quite as suddenly and inconsistently as the men of whose apostacy they complained had become liberal and tolerant. ‘After what had happened,’ said his lordship, ‘the country demanded some statutory provision to secure its agriculture, its manufactures, and its trade; but more especially to secure protestant interests against the influx and increase of the Roman catholic party : one mode of securing this, and at the same time of purifying the represent- ation, would be to abolish the borough-market, which had now been thrown open to eatholies.’ The noble mover of "this question was in a situation similar to that of the lamb in the fable, which called on the wolf, little knowing how near he was to the fold: the motion was made rather in the. nature of a notice than with any design of having the topics which it embraced fully discussed at this late period of the session: it was, however, hailed and sup- ported by some of the old reformers, though on very different ~ ap. 1829. '- GEORGE IV. 325 grounds from that dislike of free trade, and apprehension of catholic influence, which animated the mover; while Mr. W. Smith, in voting for the resolutions, expressed great satisfac- tion that the relief bill had produced one effect which its best friends had not anticipated ;—the transformation of many among the highest tories of the land into something very like radical reformers. On the twelfth of this month lord chan- cellor Lyndhurst moved the second reading of a bill which he had brought in, for expediting business in the courts of equity, and which proposed that the crown should have power to nominate another equity judge; he took this occa- sion to mollify the resentment of his aged predecessor, by extolling highly his judicial labors, whilst he kept his failings in the background : a pardonable course towards an old states- man, who, whatever those failings may have been, was at least free from all hypocrisy, and whose extraordinary power of intellect was only equalled by the integrity of his prin-» ciples.3 This bill was read a third time on the twenty-first ; but the session being far advanced, the subject was deferred to another year. Parliament was prorogued by commission on the twenty- fourth of June; about which time the legal arrangements, rendered necessary by the dismissal of sir Charles Wetherell, were completed. Sir James Scarlett, who had filled the office of attorney-general under Mr. Canning, readily con- sented to cast aside his whig principles, and serve under the duke of Wellington; and that the impropriety of again pass- ing over the head of the solicitor-general might be avoided, the latter was promoted to the first seat in the court of common pleas; chief-justice Best being removed into the house of peers, under the title of lord Wynford, and Mr. Sugden, an eminent chancery barrister, made solicitor- general: but the most important change was, the retirement of the duke of Clarence from his popular administration of the admiralty, and the return of viscount Melville as first lord ; whose conduct in his former administration had been marked -by numerous transgressions of the most serious character, 3 A subscription was opened this year among his friends and admirers to found the Eldon Law Scholarship, at Oxford ; which soon amounted to the sum of £7800: one of his admirers, Charles Francis, esq., founded also and endowed, at his own expense, ‘ the’ Eldon School at Vauxhall, for 150 boys; ‘ to perpetuate his memory, and to commemorate his able, zealous, and constant defence of our protestant reformed religion against every innovation.’ 326 ay HISTORY OF ENGLAND. CH. LXVI. especially on the coasts of Spain; and whose partiality to his countrymen was proverbial: he was succeeded at the board of control by lord Ellenborough, who had held the privy seal, which was now given to lord Rosslyn, lord Grey being objected to by the king. F The foreign affairs which require notice, as affecting Great Britain, were principally those in the East, where Turkey, now at the mercy of the Russian autocrat, was obliged to sue for peace. The terms granted were as follow:—the Pruth to constitute the European limit, as before; but Silistria to be dismantled: an alteration to be made in the Asiatic boun- daries; so that the whole eastern coast of the Black Sea, from the Kuban to the harbor of St. Nicholas, together with _ the fortresses of Anapa and Poti, should remain in possession of Russia: the principalities of Moldavia and Wallachia to be confirmed in their rights; but the Hospodars to be nomi- nated only for life, and no Turks allowed to dwell there: free trade on the Black Sea, and navigation through the Straits for vessels belonging to Russia, as well as all other countries at peace with the Porte: the sultan to defray the expenses of the war; and, finally, to accede to the treaties concluded at London, regarding the Greeks. ‘Thus, while Russia cautiously but secretly advanced nearer and nearer to the grand object of its ambitious sovereigns, Greece came to be admitted into the list of European states, and fresh prospects unfolded them- selves for the East. On the twenty-second of March, a protocol had been signed for the purpose of fixing the un- determined limits of the new kingdom; but it was now agreed to circumscribe its territory within a much narrower space: instead of adopting any boundary marked out by nature, —even that which would have comprehended the gulf of Volo on the east, and Arta on the west; and which would have left the Grecian state, though still too small, yet compact and defensible,—it was now proposed to draw the line still farther to the south, commencing on the east at Zeitoun, near Thermopyle, and running across the country in the direction of Vlachori, till it reached the river Aspropo- tamos, whose course it was to follow as far as the sea; thus excluding, not only Thessaly, but Acarnania also; and leaving the whole western frontier of northern Greece open to, or rather inviting the attacks of, its barbarian foes: and this determination was made without the wishes of the people being consulted, or any communication made to the Greek government. It seemed as if British statesmen were only A.D.. 1829. GEORGE IV. 327 anxious to leave a perpetual cause of strife, war, and blood- shed, which might afterwards turn to the account of Russia. The session of the states-general of the Netherlands, in the present year, was less tranquil and satisfactory than any that had been held since the restoration: though the king himself was not unpopular, his government had produced general dissatisfaction by some obnoxious measures; particularly by dismissing judges who were supposed to be too obstinate; by great partiality in its official appointments; and by exercising much severity against the press, when it happened to criticise the policy of administration. As soon as the states-general met, the second chamber occupied itself in discussing an im- mense number of petitions recommending improvement in the existing system; but though some amelioration was made, government rejected the proposal, that cases of alleged abuse of the liberty of the press should be tried by a jury: it also successfully opposed itself to the introduction of grand juries, and the extension of jury trials to the provincial courts and other criminal tribunals: on the other hand, a body in the chamber resisted and censured all its measures; and the session ended with more excitement than had been shown . at its commencement. In France, the session closed, after much embarrassment; and a new ministry was formed, under the presidency of prince Polignac; all the members of which belonged to the extreme right, or that section which was known to the public as advocates of irresponsible power in politics, and of spiritual dominion in matters of religion. Nothing eould exceed the unpopularity of these appoint- ments; more especially that of M. Bourmont, who claimed the confidence of his monarch for having betrayed Napoleon at Waterloo; and of Labourdonnaye, who had signalised himself by recommending a frightful system of proscription, and had formally classified those descriptions of people on whom he demanded vengeance. Incessant prosecutions of the press, for having boldly denounced these ministers and their policy, tended only to increase the general indignation; and asso- ciations were formed to resist the payment of taxes, in case ministers should attempt to rule without a chamber: prosecu- tions then increased in number; divisions arose in the cabinet itself, and M. de Labourdonnaye retired: nevertheless, the expression of public opinion against the administration con- tinued as strong and unanimous as ever. In Portugal, the wretch Miguel began to show his true , colors: after premature attempts at insurrection, in favor of 328 HISTORY OF ENGLAND. CH. LXVI. Donna Maria, had failed in Oporto, the usurper made use of this occurrence to multiply arrests in the capital: every in- dividual, whom any creature of government disliked, or any private enemy chose to denounce by an anonymous accusation, was instantly consigned to the horrid dungeons of the Limoeiro, or of St. Julian: while sentences of exile pronounced by a special commission on the conspirators of Oporto, were arbitrarily converted into capital punishment by the tyrant: in comparison, however, with death, the eondition of the prisoners, with whom the jails and fortresses were crowded to suffocation, was scarcely to be envied: though all were un- condemned, and most of them innocent, the whole were delivered over to the merciless authority of apostolic mis- creants, who seemed to find no gratification so great as that of inventing new modes of misery. Among the incarcerated were many affluent persons, who charitably contributed to support the poorer prisoners, whom their tyrants were willing to leave in utter starvation: to deprive the latter of this alleviation of misery, government ordered the former to be removed from the dungeons of the city, and immured in the fortresses of St. Julian, Belem, and Bugio: without being brought to trial, every one was cut off from communication, by speech or writing, even with the members of his own family : many died by famine and suffocation ; and suspicion was strong that in some instances poison had seconded the usurper’s jealousy: no rank, sex, or character was respected: a child, five years old, was kept in solitary confinement five days, and subjected to all the tortures of a prison, in order to extort evidence against its father and mother; a refugee Spanish bishop, who had been a member of the Cortes of 1812, and had since lived in obscurity and peace at Lisbon, was thrust into the dungeons of St. Julian, where he died within four days, in consequence of the brutal treatment he received from Telles Jordao, a brutal wretch worthy of the worst times of the inquisition, to whom was entrusted the government of that fortress for the very purpose of torturing its inmates. All these acts of the usurper were encouraged by his execrable mother, who took advantage of a season, during which her son was confined by an accident, to infuse her own diabolical spirit into the police, removing a minister who had sufficed even for Miguel, and replacing him by a minion of her own. The same sanguinary scenes were acted at Oporto, where the rage of the tyrant was backed by the bigotry of the priests ; who in their sermons and publications applauded the work of A.D. 1829. GEORGE IV. 329 death and devastation, as an acceptable offering to the Divine Majesty : one Jose ‘Agostino, a monk and court preacher, pub- lished a pamphlet, called ‘The Beast Flayed,’ urging the necessity of multiplying sacrifices, and recommending that the constitutionalists should be hanged up by the feet, and ‘the people joyfully treated daily with fresh meat from the gallows.’ ‘To crown the atrocities of Don Miguel, he who had conspired against his father, who had usurped the throne of his brother, who had laughed at promises made, and oaths sworn, in the face of Europe, now attempted to assassinate his own sister, because she had been Don Pedro’s regent, and had been faithful to his constitution: irritated by the absence of one of her servants, whom he suspected to have been sent to England for the purpose of making known the dreadful state of the country, this modern Nero burst into her room with a pistol, to which a bayonet was affixed, and attempted to strike her; but her chamberlain, the conde Camarido, who threw himself before the royal assassin, received the blow: he then fired at the princess ; but the ball missed her, and killed a servant by her side: other domestics, however, interfered, and she was hurried away from his fury. The necessities of the government increased, notwithstanding a forced issue of paper money; and recourse was had to the most rigid and ruinous expedients to fit out an expedition against Terceira, one of the Azores, and the only spot within the dominions of Portugal which remained true to its rightful monarch: thither the count Villa Flor, who, with the marquis Palmella and nineteen other general officers, had been con- demned in his absence, had contrived to escape, and taken the chief command ; but though the expedition sailed from Lisbon in the middle of June, and the troops succeeded in effecting a landing, they were totally defeated by the islanders under Villa Flor. In the mean time, the tyrant’s interest was) sup- ported at Madrid by the great influence of his mother over the family of Ferdinand; who himself regarded Miguel with peculiar complacency, from the circumstance of his having destroyed a constitutional government: in the course therefore of the present year, he acknowleged his title to the throne of Portugal, although the other sovereigns of Europe had the grace to keep aloof from any communication with his govern- ment: the Portuguese refugees, indeed, and the ministers of Don Pedro, insisted that they ought to do more, and drive him from his throne by positive interference: these applications were addressed particularly to the British ministry, on the 330 HISTORY OF ENGLAND. CH. LXVI. strength of treaties subsisting between the two countries; but lord Aberdeen, though he admitted to their fullest extent the obligations created by those treaties, maintained that they gave no countenance to the demand of an armed interference on our part, in order to remedy the consequences of an internal revolution: considering that no distinction ought to be made between the two claimants of the Portuguese crown, ministers professed their resolution to observe a strict neutrality in regard to all military operations: when therefore a considerable num- ber of Portuguese exiles resident on our southern coast ap- peared to have some design of fitting out an expedition, the Brazilian minister was informed that government would not permit such a scheme to be carried on in British harbors; and that for security’s sake these refugees must remove farther from the coast: the envoy then declared, that those troops were about to be conveyed to Brazil; and accordingly, four vessels, having on board 652 officers and men, under the com- mand of count Saldanha, set sail from Plymouth; but the British ministry, suspecting their intention of landing at Terceira, despatched an armed force, under captain Walpole of the Ranger, to cruise before that island, with instructions to use force, if necessary, to drive them from the coast; also to keep them in sight, until convinced, by the course they were steering, and the distance to which they had proceeded, that they had no intention of returning to the western isles. ‘The suspicions of our government were in this instance justified ; for the Portuguese armament appeared off Terceira, and was discovered by captain Walpole standing right in for Port Praya: two shots were then fired for the purpose of bringing them to, but without effect; when the ship, on board of which was Saldanha himself, appeared determined to push in at all hazards, a shot from point-blank distance was fired into her, which killed one man, and wounded another: the vessels then lay to, and an angry correspondence ensued; but the Portu- guese were driven off, and watched by the British commander, until they arrived within 500 miles of Scilly ; captain Walpole, after this noble exploit, in which without doubt he was a reluctant agent, then returned to his station; and count Sal- danha proceeded to Brest. Such an occurrence excited much notice in Europe, and was brought under discussion in the British parliament; being represented as a direct act of hostility in favor of the detest- able usurper against the acknowleged queen of Portugal, then residing in England; it was considered as an armed interference A.D. 1829. GEORGE IY. 331 ’ for Miguel, at the very moment when we pretended that the duties of neutrality prevented our interference altogether; and it was asked,—if we were not bound by treaties to assist the queen in recovering her crown, whence arose our right to prevent her from making any attempt by means of her own subjects? Why, when recognising her right, refusing to admit the title of Miguel, and pretending to maintain a strict impartiality, had we interfered by force against a lawful sovereign ? In answer to this, it was alleged, that the warlike armament lately attacked, had been fitted out in an English port: whether the observance of neutrality between two competitors for the crown of Portugal, one claiming it by direct succession, the other by a vote of the Cortes, and in actual possession, was right or wrong, appeared in this case a matter of indifference ; but as it had been decided on, no other course could justly have been taken; and if Miguel’s armament had been fitted out in a British port, it would have met with a similar inter- ruption. In fact, if ministers were to be attacked, the object of attack ought to have been their maintenance of neutrality toward a perjured tyrant, who had voluntarily sworn to our government that he would obey the laws, and preserve the constitution of his country ; not their adoption of proceedings, which that maintenance of neutrality rendered imperative: in the mean time, negotiations had been going on at Rio Janeiro between Don Pedro and the ministers of England and Austria, to effect some arrangement of affairs ; while a deputation had been sent by the Portuguese constitutionalists, to point out the true state of those affairs, and urge him to adopt active measures: Pedro, however, refused to accept propositions from foreign negotiators, which involved any sacrifice of his daughter’s claims; while he assured the Portuguese, that he would act so as to show his determination to maintain the rights of their queen, without entering into any compromise with the usurper of her throne: he did not, however, strengthen the hopes of his friends, at this time, by the resolution which he adopted of recalling his daughter from England to Brazil ; and the British government itself remonstrated with him on the impolicy of that step: but he had ulterior objects in view, which they could not penetrate. The history of Spain this year furnishes but few events of importance: in the early part of it, Ferdinand lost his queen ; and before its close, he contracted a third marriage with a princess of Naples, the celebrated Christina; to the great dis- 332 HISTORY OF ENGLAND. CH. LXVI. satisfaction of the adherents of his brother, Don Carlos: con- — spiracies in Catalonia, supposed to have been excited by the count d’Espagne for the sake of private advantage, were fol- lowed by cruel executions; but the rest of the country remained tranquil: its finances, however, were in so dreadful a state of exhaustion from a long continuance of misgovernment and ex- clusion, that Cadiz was declared a free port, in the hope of alluring back foreign commerce to one of its old and favorite abodes: but at this very time, the Spanish government, which had been driven from the English money market by its faith- less conduct respecting the Cortes bonds, ran the risk of losing its credit with all European states, by a discovery of its fraud in the celebrated case of the French loan. It would lead us too far from our limits to detail the affairs of the South American states; but those provinces, though lost to Spain, were as yet far from the attainment of internal tranquillity : the struggles of anarchy, for the cause of republicanism, abetted by superstition on one” side, and infidelity on the other, were now beginning. Toward the end of this year, the attention of the British nation was withdrawn from foreign transactions to the general and increasing distress of its own population among the agri- cultural, manufacturing, and commercial classes: the un- doubted existence of this distress was: assigned to various causes, according to the conflicting tenets or interests of the reasoners: free trade, a metallic currency, and the low prices of agricultural produce, were each insisted on as the origin of those evils which afflicted the country ; while the prohibitory system in commerce, an unrestricted paper currency, and high protective duties for the corn-grower, were proposed in turn, with equal confidence, as remedies. Whatever causes aggra- vated the general suffering at this period, its chief origin might be traced to the enormous pressure of our national debt, arising from a reckless war expenditure, which bore heavily on pro- ductive industry: to the evils which affected the agricultural classes, were to be added the fatal effects of the poor laws, tending to ruin the farmer by the same system of expenditure which demoralised the laborer ; also that reduction of the cir- culating medium completed last year, which, by almost doubling taxation and crippling industry, contributed to augment the general perplexity and dissatisfaction. With regard to our manufacturing and commercial interests, the competition of © other nations, since the peace, had destroyed those high profits which counterbalanced the exactions of the revenue: neither A.D. 1829. GEORGE IV. 333 had trade yet recovered itself, or commercial enterprise re- gained its elasticity, since 1826, when speculation, with its consequent panic, occasioned such immense pecuniary losses : nor can it be denied, that the new system of trade and com- merce increased the evil, by throwing numerous hands out of employment, in its transition state from restriction to com- parative freedom. ‘To these more serious causes of calamity were added a bad harvest and a severe winter; all which con- tributed to bring the productive classes of the community, and especially the lowest orders, into a state of suffering and misery, which every one, except the minister and his adherents, together with those who lived on the produce of the taxes, acknowleged to be real: unfortunately, the wretched artisans, ignorantly ascribing the reduction of wages, not to the neces- sities of trade, but to the avarice of their employers, had recourse to their usual correctives, voluntary idleness and destruction of property. The example was set by the silk- weavers of Spitalfields and Bethnal-green, and the mischief done had not been equalled for sixty years: the same spirit showed itself at Macclesfield and Coventry; nor did the manufacturing districts of Yorkshire escape the contagion: in all these places, machinery to an immense amount was destroyed ; and the artisans who showed a disposition to labor in their vocation rather than to riot, were subjected to violent outrages from their fellow-workmen, until the arrival of troops, and the apprehension of many active rioters, restored some degree of tranquillity. Lawless and mischievous as these pro- ceedings were, a great load of deplorable misery lay at the bottom: labor nowhere received its adequate remuneration ; and so low were the wages received in many branches of manufacture at this period, that a report, drawn up at Hud- dersfield by a committee of masters appointed to investigate the condition of working people, stated, ‘that within the several townships engaged in fancy business, there were 13,000 individuals, who had not more than twopence half- penny per day to live on; out of which they had to pay for the wear and tear of their looms.’ It never can be too often or too strongly insisted on, that the first and greatest object of statesmen and legislators is to discover, not only the means of employment, but the adequate reward of labor: this is the grand method of rendering a nation contented, prosperous, and powerful: without this, most difficult will be its improvement in those principles which form the best foundation of its hap- piness. 334 HISTORY OF ENGLAND. CH. LXVI. With regard to Ireland, that unfortunate country had been thrown into such a state of excitement by the harangues of the member for Clare, that scenes of violence and outrage, like those from which the emancipation bill was to relieve it, soon presented themselves: the feelings of parties still continued in full force; hostile meetings, with a considerable loss of life, took place in the counties of Armagh, Leitrim, Cavan, and Monaghan, where nothing but the presence of a military force prevented open war; while in Tipperary, matters proceeded to such a length, that the magistrates expressed ai unanimous opinion, that nothing but a revival of the insurrection act would secure the peace of the country: this however could not be effected; for it had not been suspended, but had actually expired, and parliament was not sitting. It certainly was soon perceived, that catholic emancipation had failed to lay the spirit of discontent ; and that the pacifi- _cation of our sister island still remained to exercise the ingenuity of British statesmen. Ireland never has been, nor is she likely soon to be, cordially united with her conquerors: so feeble indeed is the connexion, that it would long ago have been dis- solved, but for the superior might of England: yet if Ireland has always been a drag on this country; if she has been a source of weakness rather than of strength; an angry foe instead of an attached friend ;—she has been what the general conduct of England made her: even during the period when the religion of the two nations was the same, the state of affairs was but little better; for a spirit of tyranny and rapacity was ever at work, transferring the rich lands of that unfortunate country to her ruthless invaders; and the fiery disposition of her sons was purposely roused by insults and injuries to rebel- lion, in order that they might be plundered with a greater show of propriety: the reformation never obtained a footing among her native inhabitants ; and instead of allowing to others that freedom which we claimed ourselves, we employed our troops to turn the priests out of their churches and livings, which parliament transferred to the clergy of its own communion, though their adherents did not amount to one-tenth of the population. When this transfer, however, was effected, a large portion of the landed property still belonged to the catholic nobility and gentry; so that their spiritual guides were not wholly left to depend on the contributions of a starving peasantry: but the Irish having taken part with the Stuart dynasty, nearly nine-tenths of the intire property of the realm were confiscated under Cromwell and William II., and given A.D. 1830. GEORGE IY. 335 to protestants: these, looking up to England for support, con- sidered the poor natives, hutted on their estates, rather as implacable foes than as tenants and dependents: hence the little sympathy that has ever existed between the upper and lower classes. Indeed, most of the landholders soon quitted the country, letting their estates to middlemen, by whom they were sublet, on the most exorbitant terms, to the wretched peasants, who have been brought to as low a state of misery as any serfs in Europe: in the mean time, a comparatively small party, under the banners of an Orange confederacy, have held a tyrannical sway over the land, perverting or denying justice, and perpetuating the most intolerable abuses. When the foundation of this system was laid, the population of Ireland did not exceed 2,000,000; but it has now risen to 8,000,000, of which no less than 6,500,000 are catholics; so that all arrangements derogatory to their character and interests daily become more offensive: besides, by their own exertions they have acquired political power, and are enabled to return a large body of representatives to parliament. Of these cir- cumstances the great agitator has taken advantage ; urging the people to remonstrate, to proclaim their wrongs, and to demand full participation in all those salutary institutions, which they were taught to expect when they consented to the union: at the same time, while he stimulates them to claim equal privi- leges and equal laws, he represses outrage, and teaches them to agitate within the pale of the law, and by legal means. Against these their claims there exist many and strong antagonist forces. There is that in the very nature of popery which seems to forbid protestants to arm it with power, or to advance its interests; there is the influence of great families, enriched with Irish spoil, who have by length of time acquired a title to this property; there is a tory faction in England, desirous of punishing the Irish people for contributing so effectually to extinguish their privileges and reform the British legislature ; nor are they less anxious to uphold in full vigor a church establishment, which has always proved most fruitful in advantages to the scions of our aristocracy. Thus the whole empire has been kept in a perpetal ferment, to the grievous injury of all classes; nor has any definite. plan of remedial measures yet been proposed, without being found impracticable or insufficient. One party, ascribing all the evil to popery, declares that a leaf must be taken out of William the Conqueror’s book; and that a system, so false and anti-social, so incompatible with civil and religious liberty, 336 HISTORY OF ENGLAND. CH. LXVI. must be extirpated: another asserts, with equal confidence, that the grand nuisance is a protestant establishment ; which, being repudiated by the great mass of the people, ought to be cut down to the immediate wants and necessities of those who respect its doctrines: others ascribe the existing misery to absentee landlords, and a want of provision for the destitute poor: true, says a different set; a body of men more indifferent to the welfare of their tenantry and laborers does not exist, than the Irish landed proprietors; but to charge these persons with all the evils which afflict the country, is as absurd as to lay them at the door of the established church: their root lies far back ; for it has been the custom, from time immemorial, to divide the paternal inheritance, whether freehold or leasehold, among every surviving member of the family ; which division and subdivision of property cuts the land into patches, and rapidly breeds an agricultural popula- tion, clothed in rags, fed on potatoes, and worked like slaves ; in order, therefore, to produce any degree of comfort, the first step must be to clear away the present occupants of the soil, rather than to stereotype the evil by a system of parochial settlements ;—ejection and emigration consequently are the best modes of relief: not a few advise the outlay of capital in Treland, and the employment of ‘her redundant population in works of general utility; forgetting, that before this can be done, tranquillity must be established by some other means; since no capitalist will expend his money, or exert his industry, where life and property are insecure: where ‘ his yard-measure is a sword, and his ledger only a return of killed and wounded.’ Thus, encompassed with evils, the unhappy country has clung, with a species of unerring instinct, to its great agitator, who accelerated the first grand measure which opened a prospect of independence to catholic Ireland: even from their miserable pittance, the half starved peasantry joyfully con- tribute a portion to remunerate their benefactor, for his loss of time, and sacrifice of professional emoluments; and while his power, greater than that which any subject of this empire ever before possessed, is met by scoffs and insults in some quarters, and by alarm and terror, or indignant denunciation in others, he proceeds on his course ; flinging back the reproaches of his adversaries, and taunting them as the instruments which raised him to this height. ‘ Recall this power,’ he says, ‘ which you have given me, by the concession of justice to my country: then shall I sink back into the ranks of the people, and become as harmless as the lowest peasant.’ A.D. 1830. GEORGE IV, 337 Under such evils, mixed up as they are with the very form and constitution of society in Ireland, the most important busi- ness of the empire is interrupted; a military force is kept up in the country as large as that which is necessary for the protection of British India; and the very existence of an administration depends on the countenance which it may receive from a body of Irish agitators. To predict how long such a state of things can last, or to point out how it can be altered, is not necessarily demanded of the historian: he has fulfilled his duty, when he has fairly and impartially laid the case before his readers: but as it is impossible to remedy these evils by force of arms, in the present disposition of the British house of commons and of the Irish agitators, the great aim of our legislators should be the discovery of a different mode of cure. ‘This in fact is now the grand problem in our national policy. While to its solution the abilities of statesmen are steadily directed, all party feeling should be laid aside, all ani- mosity forgotten: it is only to be effected in a time of peace ; and if war should overtake us in circumstances which might be called a premium for invasion, Ireland would probably be lost. Our domestic annals this year were marked by the con- flagration of York Minster, that glory of English architecture : great part of the choir, with the organ, fell a sacrifice to the devouring element ; but the noble east window was fortunately preserved with little damage: the fire was traced to a man named Martin, brother to the celebrated artist of that name, who was subsequently tried for the crime at York, and found to be insane: but a meeting was immediately held, and a sufficient subscription raised by the nobility and gentry of this great aristocratic county, for the purpose of restoring its magnificent cathedral, after the original plan, under the direc- tion of Mr. Smirke. London received additional beauty and convenience from the opening of the new Fleet, or Farringdon -market ; forming a handsome quadrangle of 232 feet by 150, and standing on a surface of one acre and a half: the purchase of its site, and the expense of buildings, was estimated at about £280,000. The new Post-Office also, one of the finest edifices by which the capital is ornamented, was opened in September for the transaction of business, and an improved system was adopted for sorting, arranging, and delivering letters. A still more important alteration however took place this year in the police establishment of our metropolis, for the institution of which the public owes a large debt of gratitude to Mr. Peel.é 6 Now sir Robert Peel. ENG, XVII. 2 338 HISTORY OF ENGLAND. CH. LXVI. In the admirable regulations drawn up for the instruction of this domestic force, the grand object attended to was the pre- vention of crime: the whole metropolitan district was formed into five local divisions, each division into eight sections, and each section into eight beats; the limits of all being clearly defined, and distinguished by letters and numbers: the force itself was divided into conipanies, each having one superinten- dent, four inspectors, sixteen serjeants, and 144 police con- stables; being also subdivided into sixteen parties, each consisting of a serjeant and nine men: accurate rules were laid down for the commencement and regulation of their duty ; and during the late times of change produced by the imperative nature of circumstances on our institutions, nothing has contri- buted more to the repression of tumult, and to the security of person and property, than this corps: several years however elapsed before the corporation of the city of London could be persuaded to follow such an example, and give up their vested interests in the old system of watchmen. _ It was not without some excitement of publie indignation that, when parliament assembled on the fourth of February, the royal speech contained only a very qualified admission of the existence of national distress. In the latter part of the preceding year, our premier had made an extensive tour through various districts of the country ; but having been con- fined almost wholly to the mansions of his noble hosts, where a splendid hospitality awaited him, he had very little oppor- tunity of witnessing the misery under which the lower orders were at this time groaning: accordingly, as he may be said to have seen none, he very confidently asserted that none existed ; and as it is not usual to dispute the word of a military premier, the other members of administration, somewhat in the manner of a Turkish divan, bowed their heads submissively to the dictates of their chief. . In the house of commons, however, this incorrect and inju- dicious assertion produced so much indignation, that sir Edward Knatchbull, a county member of the high tory party, proposed an amendment to the address, assuring his majesty, ‘that distress was general among all the productive classes of the community ;’ and being supported by 105 votes, he left ministers, who had but 158, in a weak majority of 53: the amendment, proposed in the upper house by earl Stanhope, being vitiated by his notions on the currency question, was supported by a minority of only nine. The cession of the catholic claims had produced a sort of approximation between A.D. 1830. GEORGE IV. 539 the duke and the whig party, who became unwilling to abandon him to tory vengeance, though their friendship was bit luke- warm and self-interested; without it, however, the ministerial forces must have been routed at the very opening of the campaign. Lord Blandford, next day, when the report was brought up, moved what he called ‘a wholesome admonition to the throne,’ by way of appendage to the address; but this vindictive effusion, though seconded by Mr. O’Connell, and teeming with denunciations against our corrupt borough system, was repudiated by all true reformers, and found only eleven votes in its favor: fair warning, however, was given to minis- ters, that they must enter into a closer connexion with the whigs, if they wished to reckon on their support: sir Francis Burdett, in his speech, said, that ‘when the prime minister of England was found so shamefully insensible to the suffering and distress which were painfully apparent throughout the land ; when, instead of meeting such an overwhelming pressure of calamity with some measure of relief, or at least, some attempt at it, he sought to stifle every important inquiry ; when Hie called that a partial and temporary evil, which was both long-lived and universal ;—he could not look on such a mournful crisis, in which public misfortune was insulted by ministerial apathy, without hailing any prospect of change in the system that produced it. What should we say to the ignorance that could attribute our distresses to the introduction of machinery, and the application of steam,—that noblest among human inventions, to which men of science and_intelli- gence mainly ascribed our prosperity? He felt high and unfeigned respect for the premier’s abilities in the field; but he could not help now thinking, that his grace had done him- self only justice, when he said, a few months before he accepted his present office, that he should be fit to inhabit an asylum of a certain nature, if he were ever induced to take such a burden on his shoulders; in fact, both he (sir Francis) and many honorable members around him, had long treated this illustrious individual with much tenderness, because they felt that he had conferred immense benefits on his country: he was the only man in England who could have accomplished what he had done; but his praise had been in proportion, and his recompense commensurate, in returns of confidence and ap- probation: the time, however, was now come, when it would be necessary for him to do more.’ _A motion for inquiry into the state of national distress by a committee of the whole house of peers, was made by lord 340 HISTORY OF ENGLAND. CH. LXVI. Stanhope; when the earl of Eldon found himself in the strange and unusual situation of an opposition lord, condemning the language employed in the king’s speech, while he accused his ancient colleagues of coming down to parliament with a decla- ration that there were ‘other causes’ for the distress of the country, which they did not deem it expedient to specify ; and which they left for each man’s sagacity to guess at as he might. The duke of Wellington, while he still denied that the existence of distress was so extensive as had been repre- sented, and supported his opinion by the augmented consump- tion of various articles, by the increase of buildings, by the state of our saving banks, and by the advancing traffic on rail- roads and canals, maintained that the power of redress was beyond the reach of parliament; and he defied noble, lords opposite to do anything on the subject, which should be at once politic and satisfactory, expedient and efficacious: was it then right for parliament to interfere, where it was utterly im- possible to do good? The noble mover might recommend a committee ; but to what end would they follow his counsel, if he could lead them no farther? and not one step farther could he go. The marquis of Lansdowne had no hesitation in declaring what he confidently thought were the causes of distress: though fully aware that much of it might have been produced by tran- sition from a state of war to peace, yet he could not help re- collecting, that a very great part of the difficulties, out of which we now had to extricate ourselves, was to be ascribed to that fatal perseverance with which, during so many years, we had persisted in contracting permanent money engagements in a depreciated currency: that was the root of the present evil; but, in saying so, he did not forget, that unfortunate as those engagements were, they nevertheless were engagements, which the honor of parliament was bound to respect, and which we must find means to discharge: it was, however, one thing to see the cause, and another to point out a remedy: the only one which he saw at present likely to unite all opinions, was retrenchment, qualified by a diminution of taxation. Lord King proposed, as an amendment, the appointment of a select committee; but this was received with as little favor as the original motion ; which was lost, on a division, by 118 against 25. ; But the most remarkable debate arose in the house of com- mons, on a similar motion made by Mr. Davenport. In the course of its discussion, which lasted four nights, the leading A.D. 1830. GEORGE IV. 341 members of all parties delivered their opinions, which were in miany respects contradictory, on the extent as well as on the causes of the evil. ‘The opponents of the motion considered the ultimate views of its supporters as directed to the restora- tion, or at least to a modification, of our paper currency ; and that to grant it, would be a public announcement that some such measure was intended: most members seemed to think, that, even if errors had been committed, to undo now what had been done, would occasion more harm than good: if there were any particular measures, it was said, which individuals thought likely to be beneficial, let them be brought forward, and let each be discussed on its own merits: thus the subject would assume a manageable form ; but by launching forth into an investigation which included every question, the house would only cause fruitless excitement, and awaken hopes that would end in disappointment: the result, therefore, was a complete ministerial triumph, and a signal defeat of those who advocated a paper currency and high prices; comprehending not only the ultra tories, but several great landed proprietors noted for opposite political sentiments. Lord Althorp, with the leading members of the whig party generally, as well as Mr. Huskisson and his political disciples, sided with the minis- try ; and the original motion was abandoned, after an amend- ment, proposing a select committee, had been thrown out by the enormous majority of 255 to 87. When this question was set at rest, the real amount of busi- ness transacted in parliament was not very important; though the present session was distinguished by a length of debate, on many topics, beyond all precedent: the absurd and mis- chievous practice, which had lately grown up, especially in the lower house, of suffering the least competent members to make long speeches on every trivial occasion, fruitlessly con- sumed the time that should have been devoted to action ; many important questions were postponed to a period too late for settlement ; the accumulation of business outgrew the powers of ministerial industry or capacity ; and, what was still worse, the character of the house itself began to be deteriorated by the retirement of many respectable members, who were unwilling to sacrifice their own health, and the comfort of their families, to that insane ardor for speaking which now pervaded the assembly. Throughout the discussions with which this session com- menced, members who opposed government, as well as most of those who supported it, had insisted on the necessity of 342 HISTORY OF ENGLAND. CH. LXVI. reducing taxation, and curtailing the public expenses. Minis- ters had declared themselves willing to adopt every practicable saving ; and any backwardness in that respect was a disposi- tion, in which the whigs could not possibly support them; yet they found themselves under a necessity of resisting various propositions, which were brought forward as measures of proper and salutary retrenchment. The opposition ‘raised against the army, navy, and ordnance estimates was more than usually loud; the number of men proposed for land service being 88,164 (after the intended reduction of 7000); and that for the navy 20,000 seamen, with 9000 marines: Mr. Hume and other members, after animated debates, were defeated, in their proposal for a farther reduction, by large majorities ; but the opposition was less unsuccessful in several attacks on the details of expenditure. On the twelfth of February, sir James Graham, who had acquired considerable reputation as a speaker, moved for a reduction of salaries paid to official per- sons; and the foundation of his motion was, that, subsequently to the Bank restriction act, all had been augmented on the plea of an increase in the expenses of living; therefore, as the re- striction had been removed, and we had returned to cash pay- ments, these salaries ought now to be diminished: from this rule he meant indeed to exclude the privy purse and royal establishment, since they stood on arrangements entered into at the beginning of the reign, and ought not to be violated : but the motion was opposed by Mr. Dawson, secretary of the treasury, on the ground, that government had done all that as yet was possible in the way of retrenchment, and still felt a desire to proceed in a spirit of practical economy ; he therefore met the question by proposing a resolution himself—for a humble address to his majesty, praying that he would be graciously pleased to lay before the house an account of the progress which had been made in an inquiry into the various departments of the civil government instituted in the year 1821; such being one of those convenient resources that ministers keep in reserve, to dispose of questions which they find it difficult or disagreeable to grant; and by aid of this wind they now steered between the Scylla and Charybdis of aristocratic displeasure and general discontent. On the twelfth of March, sir James, who was rising fast to popularity on inde- pendent principles, brought forward a motion to consolidate the treasurership of the navy with some other office, and was supported by 90 votes in a house of 278: this encouraged him, on the twentieth of the same month, to propose an abolition of A.D. 1830, GEORGE IV. 343 the office of lieutenant-general of the ordnance; when he was defeated by a still less majority of 200 to 124. In fact, all attempts to prove the necessity of either office, as a separate and expensive &ppointment, were opposed to the common sense of the house, as well as of the country ; and the resolu- tion thus manifested of clinging to such places for the mere purposes of party influence, disgusted many independent mem- bers, and contributed to alienate their confidence from the existing government. But an exposure still more injurious to the system of corruption, accompanied too by a signal defeat of ministers, had been already effected through a motion of sir Robert Heron, on the twenty-sixth of March: this went to strike out a sum from the navy estimates, which had been granted in pensions to the sons of two cabinet ministers—the honorable Messrs. Dundas and Bathurst—as reduced commis- sioners, after a service of only four years. ‘It was well known,’ said sir Robert, who imputed no blame to the young men themselves, ‘that their fathers were noblemen who, for a great number of years, occupied, with little intermission, some of the most important situations in the government: viscount Melville, at the present moment, presided as first lord of the admiralty ; and earl Bathurst was lord president of the council, one of the tellers of the exchequer, and joint clerk of the crown: their grandfathers were also men of high con- sideration; one of them for many years filled the situation of lord high chancellor of England; and the other was a sort of viceroy of Scotland, holding places which produced great emolument, and performing services that were rather equi- vocal. Now, that these gentlemen, gorged with public money, should require for their families, or even condescend to accept, miserable pensions, and that too in a time of such public dis- tress, did appear to him most paltry: the places given to Mr. Dundas and Mr. Bathurst were offices held during pleasure ; and it was therefore in the power of government to dismiss them without pensions: what then must the country think of ministerial professions, when pensions like these were granted, not only without precedent, but without any adequate services performed ?’ This scandalous job, which served to advance the cause of parliamentary reform in no small degree, was feebly defended by the chancellor of the exchequer and Mr, Peel: but it did not admit of a single real argument in its justification ; and, on a division, the grant was disallowed; for ministers could obtain only 121 votes against 139: their ominous defeat was followed by decreasing majorities during 344 HISTORY OF ENGLAND. -CH, LXVIL the remainder of this session; showing that public confidence was fast deserting those who were so unwilling to redeem their pledges ; and who clung with such callous hearts to corrupt practices, which the public voice had now determined to denounce. : On the ninth of February, committees were appointed by both houses to take into consideration the charter of the East India company; in proposing which, it was declared, that government was free from all preconceived impressions, and in future proceedings would be guided by the result of this inquiry. A long debate also took place on a motion of Mr. Attwood, proposing to make silver a legal tender, as he main- tained it had been before the bank restriction act of 1797, and to restore the circulation of small notes: the question under- went an able and full discussion; but the notion of a double standard seemed so objectionable, and any scheme for depreci- ating the currency appeared pregnant with such dangerous consequences, that Mr. Attwood consented to withdraw his motion without dividing the house. On the fifteenth of March, the chancellor of the exchequer produced his annual exposition of the finances, which presented no remarkable features, except a repeal of the beer and leather duties; by which ministers desired to show their wish of alleviating the pressure of taxation on the lower classes. This remission of duty on beer, estimated at £3,000,000, was pro- posed to take place on the tenth of October following; and the reason given for such delay was, that the repeal should take place conjointly with an opening of the trade, when the time arrived for renewing the licenses of public houses. The measure without doubt proceeded from good motives; but the unfortunate junction alluded to, by encouraging the increase of public houses to an indefinite extent, has introduced immorality and crime into every corner of the land, where they were before almost unknown; and has probably occasioned more evil than any act passed during the whole period to which these pages refer. The demands of the public service, in- eluding the charge of our national debt, remained at £47,812,000; and the available income being estimated at 7 Denounced, as it has been, by the united voices of the clergy, magistrates, and moral men among all elasses, as filling our poor- houses and prisons with inmates, it is extraordinary that no chris- tian legislator moves for its repeal—that no one among its pro- moters seems anxious to relieve his conscience from so heavy a burden, A.D. 1830. GEORGE IV. 845 £50,470,000, a probable balance of about two millions and a half only would be left for the sinking fund. In the revenue of last year, a deficiency of more than half a million below the estimate was acknowleged; but still a clear surplus of four millions had been applied to the redemption of the debt: to compensate for the loss of revenue from the repeal of beer and leather duties, it was proposed to make a small but salutary addition to those on ardent British spirits ; and also to effect a yearly saving of £778,000, by the conversion of four per cent. stock into three and a half: these measures were subsequently carried into effect; and two motions by Mr. Hume and Mr. Poulett Thomson, for a general revision of the whole system of taxation, with a view to its reduction, were defeated. A crude and unintelligible bill for the reform of parliament, brought forward by the marquis of Blandford, the title of which professed, not to prevent, but to regulate abuses, was negatived without a division; also in the case of East Retford, the proposal for transferring its franchise to Birmingham was ultimately rejected, and the privilege extended to the adjoin- ing hundred. During the debate, Mr. Peel expressly dis- claimed the imputations which had been thrown out, that this selection had been made with a view to increase the influence of the duke of Newcastle, whom the intervening catholic bill had now thrown into the ranks of opposition ; but the circum- stance was suspicious ; and though due credit was given to the honorable secretary, that the resolution did not proceed on any bargain or understanding with the noble duke; yet there was a large portion of the house and of the country, which could not be brought to believe that a secret partiality for the aristocratic influence in boroughs had not influenced ministers in their determinations: the cause of parliamentary reform therefore advanced another step. - On the third reading of the East Retford bill, a first attempt was made in the British parliament to introduce a principle, new to the representation of this country ;—that of taking the votes of electors by ballot, which would protect them from all undue influence, whether of fear or corruption : for this motion, which was made by Mr. O’Connell, only twenty-one voices were raised; but among them were those of lords Althorp, Nugent, and Ebrington: the idea seems to have originated in certain proceedings of the duke of New- castle regarding the borough of Newark; where his grace was possessed of large property, partly held under a crown lease ; and where he had always been able to control and decide the 346 HISTORY OF ENGLAND. CH. LXVI. elections. Ina late contest, the usual result took place, and Mr. Sadler, the duke’s nominee, was elected in opposition to serjeant Wilde: in consequence, a petition was presented to the house, stating that the successful candidate’s return had been obtained through a prevailing belief, founded on ex- perience of former elections, that such of his grace’s tenants as should vote against his nominee would be expelled from their occupancies; that many, who gave their votes to the opposing candidate, had, since the election, received notice to quit their holding, whether the same was house or land, and whether it constituted part of the crown estate, or of his grace’s private property: it was added, that the duke neither denied that such notices had been given, nor disclaimed them ; but justified his conduct on a claim of right ‘to do what he would with his own’—a concise and significant sentence, which quickly ran through the land, aiding and accelerating the cause of reform more than the longest speech ever uttered in parliament. Mr. Poulett Thomson, in moving that the petition should be referred to a select committee, informed the house, not only that the use thus made of crown property affected the constitutional character of our representation, but that its original investment was a base ministerial job, which had caused a great pecuniary loss to the country: the duke of Neweastle’s principal influence at Newark arose from about 960 acres of land surrounding the town; and these he held by a lease, granted in 1760, at a rent of only thirty-six pounds! the lease had: been renewed in 1815, nine years after its ex- piration, at a rent of £2060, which fully attested the inade- quate payment previously made: but it was still too low ; since the estimated value was £3500, or at least £3000. The pecuniary loss, therefore, was worthy of attention; but that was a trifle, compared with the political purposes to which this property had been applied: the noble lessee himself never gave a lease for more than one year, in order to keep the voters completely under his power ; and the petition stated the manner in which this power had been employed: if the allegations were true, the house was bound to interfere ; for though he did not mean to impugn the just and natural influ- ence of a landlord over his tenant, he asked, whether the power arrogated in this case did not rather resemble the tyranny of a slave-driver than the proper influence of a British landowner? ‘There was not, in the present case, any objec- tion arising from. interference with the rights of private pro- A.D. 1830. ’ “GEORGE IV. 347 perty: this was a species of property, against the future abuse of which the house might guard, though they could not inter- fere with the existing lease ; for they could address the crown, praying that it might not be renewed: with a view to have the allegations sifted, he moved that the petition be referred to a select committee. The indignation of Mr. Hobhouse was particularly excited, and his eloquence exerted on this occasion : * suppose,’ said he, ‘the king’s government should send to the duke of Neweastle, and let him know, that, when his lease expired, it should no longer be renewed: suppose that such an intimation was given to his grace, and it was understood or alleged that his ejectment would take place in consequence of a vote given against administration on some great and leading question: if this were done, would it not be denounced as an attack on our dearest privileges ; as an invasion of the most sacred birthright of Englishmen,—the liberty’ to assert and maintain their opinions? Compare then the conduct of government in such a case with that of the peer: here were these poor men, because they dared to vote against his candi- date, banished from their homes, driven from their happy firesides, and deprived of all the comforts of life. Could such conduct, on the part of the noble duke, bear any comparison with the case of government depriving him of these crown Jands, for giving a vote against them ?” Mr. Sadler rose to declare the petition a mere election paper, made up of wanton allegations and unfounded state- ments: while he vindicated his patron’s character for human- ity and consideration, as regarded the inhabitants of Newark. Mr. Peel, however, defended at large the principle of the whole transaction, as well as the mode by which the land in question had been acquired: he could see no valid distinction between this property, and that which descended to a man as a freehold from his ancestors. ‘The lease,’ he said, ‘ which his grace possessed of this crown land, gave him a right to deal with it as with any other portion of his possessions during that period ; and in dealing with the property of the crown as with his own, it was obvious that he committed no breach of privilege: now the petitioners intirely confined themselves to the crown possessions held by the noble duke, praying that a lease of them might in future be refused to him; they did not even refer to his other property, with regard to which he had dealt precisely in the same manner: it was plain, therefore, that if, in the management of his own private possessions, he had committed no breach of privilege, he had committed none 848 HISTORY OF ENGLAND. CH. LXVI. by dealing in a similar manner with the property of the crown. He would not say that the duke of Newcastle did not dis- possess these tenants; but without entering into that question, he would say, that superior to the privileges of that house were other considerations, to which they were bound in duty and conscience to defer—namely, the rights of property : here was no allegation that menaces had been employed ; there was only the fact that seven tenants had been dispossessed: now, if they were to control the rights of property, under the idea that those rights had been exercised in controlling an election, a precedent would be set, which might be not merely incon- venient, but positively dangerous ; for nothing could be more dangerous than to say, they would not suffer any tenant to be dispossessed, who had voted in opposition to his landlord’s wishes: it was in vain that honorable gentlemen exclaimed against the influence which any peer derived from the posses- sion of property; there was no difference between that and the influence which any other great landed proprietor enjoyed ; nor could any specieS of reform exclude such influence: pro- perty, he contended should always have an influence in that house, no matter whether it was in the hands.of peers or com- moners.’ ‘The motion for referring the petition to a select committee was negatived by a majority of 194 against 61; but although the legal right in the present instance could scarcely be denied, the judicious exercise of it was another considera- tion; and as the people of England generally entertained an opinion on this point at variance with that of Mr. Peel and his colleagues, there can be no doubt but this transaction also accelerated the march of reform. Of all the numerous plans for altering our system of repre- sentation, whether suggested by an honest desire to obviate a necessity of sweeping innovations, or springing from the designs of restless demagogues, there were none against which so little could be said as the proposition for conferring the elective franchise on populous manufacturing towns. When proposed to be effected, as in the case of Penryn and East Retford, merely by applying to this purpose privileges which became disposable through the gross delinquencies of corrupt boroughs, it assumed its most innocent form; not adding even to the number of our representatives: though lord John Russell therefore failed in his motion for transferring the elective fran- chise of East Retford to Birmingham, he did not hesitate to bring the subject again before parliament, by moving for a bill to confer that privilege, independently of all other considera- A.D. 1830. GEORGE IV. 349 tions, on Leeds, Birmingham, and Manchester: and he founded this measure on the known practice of parliament, which ex- tended such rights to unrepresented places, when they had ac- quired importance by their wealth and population. ‘It was true,’ he said, ‘ the proposal hitherto had been, that the franchise should not be conferred till the house had a forfeiture to dispose of; but it was now plain, that if the towns in question were to wait for such a transfer, there was no probability of their ever obtaining it; so numerous were the difficulties started in both houses of parliament: it also seemed not very reasonable, that the fitness of Leeds or Manchester to be represented should be said to depend on the good or bad conduct of the electors of Penryn or East Retford: their claims must rest on circum- stances in their own situation; and if that situation was such as to render it just and desirable that they should be repre- sented, where was the sense of saying, that what was just and reasonable ought not to be done, because the electors of some other place had refused to do what was wicked ?’? His lordship _ then entered into various details, to show how great bad been the increase of the towns in question; declaring ‘ that he could see no reason why so many citizens and so much wealth should remain unrepresented, when the principle, as well as the practice of our constitution, had pointed out a method of ad- mitting them into parliament. _ He knew it would be said, that there was no limitation to this principle: he confessed it ; and he saw no reason why, if Sheflield, or any other town, should, at some future period, attain to the same rank, it should not obtain the same privilege; but it was not probable that the principle could ever be applied to more than four or five towns in the whole realm: parliament had not always been so fasti- dious in regard to the possible extension of a principle; wit- ness the disfranchisement of the Irish forty-shilling freeholders : he did not mean even to augment permanently the numbers of the house; for he should propose, that in future cases of dis- franchisement, the privileges should not be transferred. The whole measure seemed to him incapable of alarming the most timid person, and ought to be received joyfully by the deter- mined adversaries of dangerous innovation: moreover in look- ing at the state of other countries, he felt still more strongly the conviction of its good policy: we could not shut our eyes to the fact, that a collision between royal authority and popular resistance was rapidly approaching in France, though all must regret that some compromise was not contemplated to save society from its consequences: it was for.us then to profit by 350 HISTORY OF ENGLAND. CH. LXVI. the warning, and awaken in time to a perception of the nice mechanism of our own representative government: it behoved those who, like himself, were lovers of liberty without disorder, and of peace without slavery, to watch anxiously at such a period ; endeavoring so to accommodate our system to altered times and circumstances, as to render it worthy of the respect and affection of our people. The constitution itself supplied us with the means; we had only to use its own renovating principles: its fabric was not, as many seemed to imagine, that of a Grecian temple, perfect and complete in all its parts, which could not suffer alteration without the destruction of its symmetry ; it was more like a Gothic structure, susceptible of enlargement, consistently with the integrity of its ornaments and the security of its duration. The moderate views on which this bill was founded were enforced by lord Sandon, Mr. Brougham, Dr. Lushington, and Mr. Huskisson ; but although, as the latter gentleman prophe- tically observed, the time was fast approaching when ministers would be compelled to come down to the house with some measure, or to resign their situations, and nothing was more unwise than for a government to delay important propositions till driven forward by overwhelming majorities,;—ministerial apathy and old prejudices prevailed; so that the motion was negatived by 188 votes against 140. Instead of setting themselves resolutely and soberly to work in reforming abuses, the high conservative party sat mourning over what they called. sacr tfices already made, ‘and trembling at the consequences which they anticipated: their condition may be estimated from a few passages in the correspondence of their great leader at this time with his brother lord Stowell. ‘It is impossible,’ says the ex-chancellor, ‘ to contemplate what is passing, and to which you refer, without apprehensions of a very serious kind: what is so passing is a renewal, but more frightful, of the prospects of 1791-5. The occurrences of those days, involving the crown and house of parliament, by express mention, in revolutionary projects, and the language—No king—pave them a treasonable character which enabled government to deal with them by law. ‘This is now in their resolutions, declarations, and petitions, carefully avoided ; which are more difficult to be dealt with, because more difficult to be met by the existing laws: they are of course more dan- gerous. ‘The sacrifice too of the test act, and the passing of the Roman catholic emancipation bill, added to the intimida- tion effected by the unpunished, or rewarded, threats of the A.D. 1830. GEORGE IV. 351 Irish association of O’Connell and Co., have established a pre- cedent so dangerous, so encouraging to the present attempts at revolution under the name of reform, that he must be, in my judgment, a very bold foo] who does not tremble at what seems fast approaching. Look, too, at France. What the duke of Wellington will do, I pretend not to guess. What will be said now about the fact, that all the occasional laws against sedition have been suffered to expire? Heaven save us now! Sor in man there is no sufficient help.’8 Owing to the praiseworthy efforts of Mr. Peel, a bill was passed this session for the limitation of capital punishment in eases of forgery: its principle went to remit that penalty, where the complainants, by due caution, could have protected themselves ; and to retain it in other cases, such as forgeries of the great or privy seal, wills, warrants on the public funds, and orders for the payment of money. An amendment, proposed by sir James Mackintosh, confining the infliction of death to the forgery of a will only, was carried in the commons; but the bill was altered again by the lords; and, being brought back to its original principle, ultimately passed both houses. A long discussion took place in the commons, respecting the con- duct of the attorney-general, in filing ex officio informations against the proprietor of a London newspaper; when the general impression on the house seemed to be, that the prose- cutions complained of were harsh and vindictive; and that sir James Scarlett, notwithstanding his whig education, and a political life spent in opposition, was inclined to be a very harsh attorney-general, and was preparing to secede from his former friends and principles: he made one expiring, but futile attempt, to obtain popularity, by a bill to alter the laws of libel, as they existed in what were called the six acts; one of which provided, that a second conviction for any seditious or blas- phemous libel might be punished with transportation; and another demanded, that every person who published a news- paper should enter into a recognisance of £300 in London, and £200 in the country, with two sufficient securities, in order to guard against the circufation of such libels; and to ensure a fund, available toward the payment of any penalty awarded against their authors: by the bill now introduced, the punish- ment of transportation was to be repealed, but the securities raised to £400 in London, and £300 in the country. It was objected, that the repeal proposed was no boon; since it was known from the first that the power granted by the act would 8 Life, by Horace Twiss, vol. iii. p. 106. 352 HISTORY OF ENGLAND. CH, LXVI. never be exercised ; while the latter proposition was calculated to impose additional shackles on the press: when the bill therefore was in committee, a majority rejected this clause, on the motion of lord Morpeth; but, on the third reading, sir James, having brought down, or opportunely found, a more numerous attendance of ministerial members, moved and carried its restoration. Committees of the house of commons, and the law commis- sioners, having found much to blame in arrangements for the distribution of justice in Wales, an act passed this session, abolishing the separate system of Welsh judicature, and annexing it to that of England. By the same bill, the number of puisne judges was increased from twelve to fifteen ; a new one being added to each of the courts of king’s bench, common pleas, and exchequer: but in Scotland, a different system was pursued; for while the high court of admiralty and commissary court were abolished, the remaining court of session was diminished, by the subtraction of two from its fifteen lords ordinary, or working judges; on whose ability to get through their work it depends, whether the eight other judges, who sit, four and four, in two courts of review, shall have judgments brought before them. These, and some other objects of importance, among which may be reckoned lord Lyndhurst’s bill fors improving our courts of equity, which was again opposed by lord Eldon, engaged the attention of parliament, until it was interrupted by the sovereign’s decease. His majesty’s health had been for a considerable time in a precarious state; but the first bulletin was not issued till the fifteenth of ‘April, when it was announced that he was laboring under a bilious attack, ac- companied by an embarrassment in his breathing. The dis- order was afterwards ascertained to have been an ossification of the valves of the heart, the symptoms continuing to vary ; so that the patient enjoyed temporary intervals of com- parative ease, though such an accession of bodily debility ensued as rendered the slightest exertion painful: in con- sequence, a message was sent down, on the twenty-fourth of May, to both houses, stating that his majesty found it incon- venient to sign public documents with his own hand, and requesting parliament to provide means for the temporary discharge of that function of the crown, without detriment to the public service: a bill was accordingly passed, allowing the sign manual to be executed with a stamp; such instru- ment to be used in the presence of the king, by some person A.D. 1830, GEORGE IV. . 353 authorised by his majesty’s word of mouth ; the same person being also required to sign a declaration to that effect, in presence of certain high officers of state; nor was any document to be stamped, before its indorsement by three privy councillors had taken place. This arrangement, so im- portant to the public business, caused much discussion, and was the first true indication of the king’s real condition to the people; from whom he had of late so intirely secluded him- self, that even his death excited less sensation than usually follows the departure of a monarch. About the end of May, a favorable turn of the disorder gave rise to hope, and his majesty attended to public business; but this feeling soon passed away ; for his chest became affected, blood was mingled with the expectoration, and general debility rapidly ensued. . | Some short time before the final catastrophe, his majesty’s physicians delicately but candidly intimated to him, that all farther endeavors to avert the stroke of death would be un- availing; when he calmly answered, ‘God’s will be done!’ and subsequently received the holy sacrament from the hands of the bishop of Chichester: soon after, his voice became faint and low; for several days his words were scarcely arti- culated; his sleep was broken and disturbed; and he. was constantly in need of assistance. ‘Thus lay, George IV. in the magnificent palace of the kings of England, surrounded by luxuries and splendor unknown to the greatest of his pre- decessors, when the angel of death approached, on the night of Friday, the twenty-fifth of June: he had slept little during the evening, and from eleven to three was in a restless slumber, opening his eyes occasionally when he suffered more than usual pain from a cough, which appeared to be occa- sioned by the impeded flow of blood through the left side of the heart; in consequence of which it was thrown back on the lungs so as to produce congestion: nothing, however, oc- curred till three o’clock which indicated any particular change, when the king beckoned to the page in waiting to alter his position: he was immediately obeyed ; the couch, constructed for the purpose, was gently raised, and the sufferer lifted to his chair: but at that moment a blood-vessel burst: the effect was apparent to his attendants, who hastened to apply the usual stimulants, and to call in the physicians; when the royal patient himself perceived that his dissolution was at hand, and exclaimed,—‘ O God, I am dying!’ A few seconds afterwards, in a whisper scarcely audible, he added— This is ENG. XVII. 2A 354 HISTORY OF ENGLAND. CH, LXVI. death !’—and when the medical men entered the apartment, George IV. had ceased to breathe. In estimating the character of this monarch, who was born with an amiable disposition, whose mind was highly cultivated, whose charity was great, and whose manners were perfect, let us not, while we acknowlege the imperfections which obscured those fine qualities, forget the powerful temptations to which he was peculiarly exposed ; and if we see anything to blame in his conduct as a prince, let us at least confess that he betrayed no desire unduly to extend the prerogative, or to curtail the just rights of his subjects. As regent, his name will ever be associated with the most splendid triumphs that adorn our annals; and although some of those triumphs may be said to have arisen out of peculiar circumstances and the spirit of the times, yet his reign was illustrated by the bril- liant progress of intellect, and by a general improvement in the liberal arts, of which he was a munificent patron. As soon as the king’s decease was known, his next brother, William Henry, duke of Clarence, was proclaimed by the title of William IV.; nor did the new monarch fail to acquire great popularity, by the simplicity of his habits and manners, as well as by the condescending familiarity of, his intercourse with the people ;—qualities, which lost none of their attrac- tion by a comparison with the secluded and misanthropic kind of life which his predecessor had lately led. No immediate alteration took place in the government; for his majesty, after the usual oaths for the security of the church of Scot- land, having signed such instruments as are requisite at the commencement of a new reign, re-appointed the judges and other great officers of state to the places which had become vacant, and signified to the members of the cabinet that he was anxious to retain their services: a revolution, however, had taken place in the feelings of their most important political supporters, which, added. to national distress, and the disturbed state of public sentiment, soon occasioned, not only their retirement from office, but the greatest organic change in the British constitution that has taken place since the revolu- tion of 1688. END OF VOL. XVII. LONDON: PRINTED BY W. CLOWES AND SONS, STAMFORD STREET, , PER teh ae Pe ener’ Fie. 3. i SS Pa ee ease? EGER SS ty §. a a } ‘ qe) * may rk a a4 NGS cee ” if i: \ . ’ ¥ ® iy et: Ft , die el Sad Ed 4 aes sh eh fl. sa < z 4 o c v 2 a) re) ; & = = re (e) ‘ > e 7) ed w > z => ty de, > y, ‘ ¥ —— =o + ——____ ——— ——————_ ES 7 = EEE ere ———— ee ——— ee “ —— OO ——————— [—] _——————— as i—J —_————— (=) —————— 4 = SSaaeee! ” o f__] > —_—_ c =e Oo) = a ae oD ee = — SSS ~ —— E eS =f: =S=—=wun Cd EEE » —— Cc s — = SSS==SS= a —————— CS i—J ee s ——_—_——. ‘ ku SS ) SP o ‘ ‘ Py nd a ss ‘ j=) SSS is > TT ” ee : re Sa ae + ——__—_ f x tee \ 7 hey te) 3 4 i Pe : \ y e 3 - ' ; 5 “pe . ‘ r . ‘a : ; Ah » . Pr iteettt ANY . a PF, ‘e ; ‘ \ * * as ‘ rf | x ‘ \ TARAS AN ‘ ‘ ; MERCER ~*~ Pay a4 “hdd dj fdtetd SES Msi sih 3 Lope 14's nll rT tPA