AEF ie he é WOMAN'S INTERNATIONAL LEAGUE LECTURE BY DR. GiORGE W, NASMYTH APRIL ete. L919 4; SUBJECT: Territorial Adjustments, The problem we are going to study this evening is Terri- torial Adjustments, and I brought with me a very intd@resting map, and in these little pamphiets which you can get at cost from the World Peace Foundation, I think, at five cents a piece, - at 40 Mt. Vernon Street, Boston, Mass,, there is a small reproduction of this map in the back, We have been accustomed to looking at war maps which change from day to day, This is a different kind of a map, a map which never changes - at least, it changes very slowly in the course of generation: and centuries, because it.is a map of nationality, And whatever settlement of the problems comes out of the peace conférence, this . map will have ‘to be the basis of the future world, That is, if you nave a League of Nations on the one hand composed of the present covernments, they will have to find some way of adjusting problems between the Poles and the Czecho-Slovaks - between the Poles and the Ukrainians - and all the other problems of that kind. If, on the other hand, the revolution sweeps on from Russia and Hungary into Austria and Germany and on from there into Italy, Spain and France, and possibly England, and we have a socialist Europe, still these problems of territorial adjustment will have to be worked Out - some solution will have to be found, . , 9 So that the things which we shall discuss tonight are fundamental problems of international co-operation, irrespective of what kind of a settlement comes out of the Peace Conference. Since the Armistice was signed on November 11th, sixteen wars have broken out in Europe, (laughter) and they are mostly over questions of territorial adjustment, and I want to discuss with you five fundamental tcrinciples of territorial adjustments taking con- crete illustrations from this map. Notice that this map disregards political boundaries, You cannot tell by looking at it where any state begins or ends unless you look ratner closely. You can find the cld poundary of Germahy running around here and the boundary of Austria running around there, and the old bountary of Russia running around there, (sveaker following locations on the map) Poland is divided into three parts. But on this map the thing that stands out is this yellow area of Poland, It is as if there had never been a partition, and if you study the realities instead of the fictions of governments and political organizations, there has never been a parti- tion of Poland of course, The Polish nationality is in existence, - is stronger - is more determined to achieve its freedom, than it was 150 years ago at the time of the partition. And so with this island nationality of the Eohemians and Moravians and Czecho-Slovak nation. Here this yellow region is the Hungarians, Here is the great Jugo-Slav nation, consisting of Serbia, Uroatia, Dalmatia and Bosnia, and here is hontenegro. Here are the Bulgarians, This brown is the Greeks, and you will notice that the islands all through this region and the coastal areas along Asia iinor here are also brown, The Greeks were great coast colonizers, In the middle here between Bulgaria and Serbia is a red portion of liacedonia in dispyte, although it is pretty generally agreed, or was at least before the war, that Macedonia is Bulgarian,- on the principle of self-determination. We had a congress in Chicago of 50,000 liacedonians the year before the war, and they voted unani- mougly in favor of annexation to Bulgaria, Then up here oome the Baltic provinces - Lithuania, “sthonia, and Livonia. Here is Finland, @e! mA ee: = =i) Py ty ae ‘ania ta : wre 2 ate “mh? ae te a es Fe and Russia is shown here as one color, although the divisions are indicated - the Great Russians here, the White Russians here and the Little Russians or Ukrainians in the south, bordering on the Black Sea. This green portion is the truly Turkish portion of the Ottoman Empire arid Aetolia. Here are the Armenians extending down into the Mesopotamian Valley; here are the Syrians and people of Palestine on the eastern coast of the Mediterranean. Now the first principle that stands out if we are to have a Hurope at peace in the future, is the principle of nationality - the attempt to deny that principle, - the frustration of the as- piration towards unity of those people who have a common spirit, - because that is after all what nationality comes back to. It isn't altogether language; it isn't altogether geographical propinquity. In the case of Switzerland, for example, you have French and German and Italians forming one nationality, because of a common history and @ common tradition and a common culture and common ideals. It is a spiritual thing, and the attempt to deny the aspirations of nationality by the opposing principle of imperialism has led to much of the suffering and horror through which Europe has passed during the past century. So that if we are to have a Hurope at peace in the future, the principle of nationality must be taken as a fundamental prin- ciple of settlement. That gives us some interesting results. It means that Alsace Lorraine will be annexed to France; it means that the partition of Poland will be undone, and it is interesting to note that there is a tongue of yellow area here - Polish inhabited area - going up to the Baltic sea, just west of the Gulf of Danzig - not the city of Danzig itself which has .a majority of Germans in its population, but just. west is a tongue,@adcuriously enough if you were close enough you couid see a thin yellow line of Polish immi- gration stretching clear across Germany here. They have followed a family line of migration apparently, and there is a stream of Polish villages and towns straight across marking a migratory ven- ture some time in the past. It means that we shall have the new Czecho-Slovak nation here, the new Jugo-Slav nation here, which has already been recognized... It means that there will be a greater Roumania here including this portion of the former Hungarian King- dom - Transylvania, west of the mountains here, and also this rich portion of what was Russia - Bessarabia, taken from the Turks and held by Russia ever since the war of 1877. If then we take the principle of self-determination -O& the wishes of the peoples themselves as the fundamental principle in territorial adjustment, - in redrawing the map of Europe, we come immediately upon a second problem, and that is the rights of minor- ities. If you look, for example, at this new Roumania which is in process of being created, you will find that right in the center of it is a yellow resion of Hungarians - Magars - so that if you think of Transylvania as being an Irish problem you will find that it has also its Uister problem, and one of the main reasons on which the Hungarians have objected to a settlement of the Tran+~- sylvanian problem has been that the major minority there would be oppresséd. It shows particularly in the case of Transylvania - this: Hungarian minority = but 2t. issequally true in ail ‘of these areas. . For example, this Armenian area here in yellow, which shows as one solid block, has scattered through it little groups of Kurds and of Turks and.of Gréeks, a@nd.so in all of these other areas you have also the problem of a minority when you try to settle the territorial adjustment on the basis of self-determination. Now what is the matter in Ulster? The minority is claiming the. right to place an absolute veto upon the rights of the Irish to self-determination. That is clearly an impossible position to ttake, and if the minorities are to have the right of veto on any change through here, there is no hope for any settlement of the future map of Zurope on a basis of permanent peace. The thing which minorities ought to have is guarantees and protection - the right to sveak their own language - to have their own religion - to have their own educational systems, schools and universities - to develop their own culture, The rights of » : ev etn en Je af a minorities ought to be protected and guaranteed. But minorities in Ulster -or Transylvania or anywhere else ogght not to have the yj veto over the vrinciple ot self-determination. That is the second % principle that must be recognized whether we have a Rolshevist surope or a capitalist League of Nations Europe, - boundaries have got to be settled first on the principle of nationality, and Secondly the rights of minorities within those i ,+4 2 got to be safeguarded. nationalities have The third principle comes out when you study a ro) like that of Trieste, or Fiume, or Salonica ee Ke pae Lc Eneiae seaports - because all of these nationalities must have access to the seas. The high sea is the great highway of the world's commerce, and in these days of the division of labor and inter-: national exchange of products, a nation which is cut off from access to the sea, is condemned toa very low degree of economic life and vo pretty severe suffering. The cutting off of Serbia from her little window on the Adriatic was the cause of the second Balkan war, and that led in part to the third Balkan war, which is this great European conflagration, ; Now, take the city of Trieste, for example, - the majority of the people of Triette are Italian - sneak the Italian language and wish to belong to Italy, and Trieste goes to Italy under the principle of nationality. But the prosperity of Trieste depends upon this great Hinterland, It is the seaport for the industrial regions of Bohemia and all of this region of Austria lying in here, and if Trieste is merely annexed to Italy and included in the italian tariff wall, cut off from the Hinterland upon which its prosperity depends, the same thing will heppen to Trieste as happened to Salonica after the second Balkan war, ~ .- sepkis. nia : Salonica was annexed to Greece because the majority of its people were Greek, but the prosperity of Salonica depended upon all this Macedonian region, and this Balkan Hinter- land, and when Salonica was annexed to Greece and the Greek tariff wall was -put around her and she was cut off from that Hinterland upon which her prosperity depended, her people starved to death. Her population was reduced to less than one-haft? in the course of two years, and the same thing would happen to Trieste and to Fiume and to these other seaport towns if the principle of nation-~ ality were allowed to rule alone, So that not only have we got to add the principle of the safeguarding the rights of minorities to the principle of nation- ality - we have to add-also the principle of economic relations - of access to the sea - of internationalizing seaports whose pros- perity depends upon a Hinterland of different nationality. In the case of Fiume and these other ports we heve a very difficult com- plication of nationality with economic and military considerations. Italy claims not only Trieste which is Italian in population, hut 4 and @1so Apalato and Durazzo, and the other seaports of the Jugo- Slav nation. The commercial rivalry between Trieste and Fiume and Spalato and Durazzo and these other ports is very keen and the tendency would undoubtedly be to hinder the development of these seaports, - to make more of the commerce flow through Trieste - to give Trieste an advantage over Fiume and the other ports there,-- if Italy were able to control the flow of commerce through them. So that not only da you have these strategic and military considerations which Italy is urging as the ground for her annex- ation of Dalmatia, but you have also these economic rivalries be- tween the different seaports end the principle of nationality. If then we look at a nation like this @gecho-S$lovak nation- an island nationality - we find that another principle must be taken into consideration, and that is economic interdependence, A Qzecho-Slovak nation without access to the sea, without some kind of an international highway here, or a Poland without an access to the sea here, - would have a very difficuit time to survive, and would probably find its economic existence impossible. Not only that, but this whole Balkan region is an example of some- thing ‘that applies on a larger scale all through the map. This whole valley of the Danube here between the Carpathian mountains ¢ also Fiume which is more largely Slavie population, ohne On the north, and the Dalmatian mountains on the south-west, is one eoonomic unit, and the attempt to split that up into separate nationalities, - let each one have its own tariff walls, its own army and navy, and its own diplomatic service and all the rest of it, - would simply result in a chaos there, It would be the Balkan anarchy that we have had diwing the past half century and a seat of constant wars - tariff wars - boundary wars - racial wars - extermin- ations - massacres, and all sorts of troubles of that kind. So that nationality is evidently not the last word in the Solution of international problems, It is a force which must be recognized; the attempt to frustrate it in the past, to oppose to it the reactionary principle of imperialism - has had two evils in its effect. One is to make these nations bristle with resentment and over-emphasize their nationalitiistic characteristics. Masserick and Paderewski and the other representatives of these nationalities down through here, are extreme examples of nationalistic feeling, On the other hand the curse of imperialism, of course, has reflected back into the social structure of the nations which exercised it. You will find in America ths men who have been the governors of the Philippines upholding the doctrine that might makes right, and our social] structyre as well as thé social structure of all the countries of Europe are distorted by imperialism. That is not only an evil for the countries which suffer in this frustration of their nationalistic aspirations, but an evil for the nations which impose imperialism on the others. | | However, after you have recognized the irresistible forde of nationality, you have to add to it all these other consideratioms, First that of toleration of the rights of minorities; secondly, of international free cities and access to the seas; thirdly, of economic invercourse, interdependence, and freedom of trade - is what it comes to finally; - and lastly, nationality is something which should be recognized only because it is the necessary step through which we must go on the way to world federation. Now those principles are fundamental principles, as I say, whether we are to have a Rolshevist Europe or a concert of powers or League of Nations Europe. . We have all these sixteen wars going on at the present time over questions of boundaries, questions of nationality, questions of the rights of minorities; - ahd that question of the rights of minorities always gets mixed up with the social conflict. The Jews, for example, are persecuted and massacred and oppressed in Roumania, in Poland, in Russia, under the old regime, ~- not only on account of religious prejudices, but more largely usually because the Jews are the leaders in thought, are the most radical groups in the pop- ulation, are socialistic and advance in their social and political thinking, and 30 you have had the persecution of minorities merging into a class war, and the Austro-Hungarian Dmpire has been a storm center of Europe because it was split one way by divisions of nation- ality and spiit the other wey by divisions of social philosophy and class war, and ‘witn that double splitting of the Austro-Hungarian Hmpire ho democracy could davelop. uliititariem was enthronsd. The powere of imporialism-could set off one cluss group ageinst the other, and keeping these groups fighting among themselves were able to pre- vont the development of any democratic forces and to maintain their power of militarism and of imverialism supreme, So that whetever the structure we hope to build in Europe for the future, the foundations must be laid upon principles of justice - upon principles of sclf-determination of the people with the rights of minorities safcpuarded, - with access to the sea for 211 these industrial and agricultural regions, + with freedom of economic intercourse, - and with the principle of federation, free, voluntary co-operation and federation, replacing the old principle of imperialism imposed by force. There was a certain justification, I suppose, in the saying attributed to Bismarck that if thrre® were no Austro-Hungérian Empire one would have to be created. The basis of that is the economic unity which exists in all this region of the Danube Valley, and + or one religious group or linguistic group against another, ee MEP “tet ie » ~S= in truth in all this region of Hurope and of all the world. The : world has become economically interdependent, and an attempt to isolate nationalities, build up tariff walls or military walls or national walls of various kinds, is Simply placing obstacles in the way of irresistible forces, and reculte in friction and explosions, This Armenian problem is a rather interesting one. I think this map is somewhat favorable to the Armenians, because some OL’ these regions that are colored yellow do not have a majority of \rmenian population. What they do have is a larger minority, - a larger vercentage of Armenians than any other. Some of these cities, "or example, have forty percent of Armenians, and thirty percent of iurka, and twenty percent of Kurds, and ten percent of Greeks, The arpmenians are not a majority, but they are the largest minority, and if you take that as a basis not oe ee for absolute majorities vhere they do not exist, you find that the natural boundaries of sPmenia would reach down to the Nediterranean Sea at Alexandria here, a port near Adana (?), and would reach almost up to the Black Sea at Trebezond, and almost over to the Caspian Sea in the northern purt of Persia, | Then Russia is a most interesting study. The Georgians, Caucasians and Tartars, ané@ all of these different groups in through here, I suppose they really ought to be colored differently - the JUXrainians- and the White Russians and the Great Russians there. Russia was really an artificial grouping of nationalities held to- gether by the pressure of outside Military force and imperialism, as was the Austro-Hungarian Empire, and the present development on the basis of free federation and co-operation of the peoples solves what would otherwise have been 4 very dangerous problem, In other words, if the Russian Empire had continued as it was before the war, the national aspirations which were suppressed there would in the next few years have become irresistible in their force as they became in the Austria-Hungarian Empire and resulted in another war. There is an interesting illustration in the case of Relgium of the interplay of these forces of nationality, economic pressure 434 social cleavage, In the north are the Flemish who speak a language very closely allied to the Dutch and are Protestant, In the south are 5a@ Waloons who speak French and are Ronan Catholic, as are the major~ ity of the French people. During the German occupation of Belgium, “he Germans tried very hard to conciliate the Flemish part of the ‘opulation, claiming that they were part of the Germanic race, etc., id succeeded far enough so as to bring the #lemish under very grave “iSpieion on the part of the Waloons. That situation was further omplicated by the fact that the Flemish are more radical in their views, The conservative Roman Catholic party of Belgium springs very largely from this Waloon region here, whereas the radical socialistic forces come from the Flemish portions, so that in the struggle of those two groups for the domination over the Belgium of the future, séch of them has put forward and exaggerated claims, and you find the eather astounding spectacle of Belgium who is protesting against imperialism and annexation now putting forward two claims - the Flemish part claiming Linburg and®?part of Holland, the Waloon part attempting tO annex Luxemburg and a part of Germany, - each of them trying to add area to its power as the north and south tried in trying to annex +8xas and Kansas and Nebraska, etc,, the Slave-owning part trying to get additional territory and population and power, and the non-slave 1olding part trying to gain power on its side, That same kind of a conflict is going on here in these rival annexation claims of Belgiun, This map shows very clearly that there is no basis whatever “or the French claim for the annexation of the left bank of the Rhine, ‘ Ly oye < eae ote ™~ -7- Now who would like to alex the first questidn on this intensely interesting subject? j QUESTION - Won't you say something about the Danzig Situation. DR, NASLYTH - This Polish tongue of land which runs up here is just west of the Gulf of Danzig but does not touch the city of Danzig, The majority of the peopte of Danzig are Germans although there is an area just west of the City of Danzig in which the majority pf the people are Polish. The difficulty there is that if you give this tongue of land to Poland it cuts these German, people in two. It separates Konigsbureg and this intensely loyal part of Prussia from the western part of Prussia, so that the solution evidently is to make Danzig & free port, a free internation al city, where the east and west and north and south routes can cross without putting obstacles in the way of either. QUESTION - What about a statement that I saw that some German statesman had made that the allies had chosen one out of six different methods of giving Poland an outlet to the sea - do you know the six methods? ; DR. NASMYTH - Well, there are other cities up here- Konigsburg, etc. There are railways that run up here that could be internationalized -- QUESTION - Do you know if there has been any other definite suggestion? DR. NASIYTH ~ No, I don't. It would be a pretty long route dovwm to the Adriatic Sea. QUESTION - What would it be like if they ran a route up at the extreme right? DR. NASYYTH - That would be up to honigsburg here. It is more intensely German here; there is a tongue of Polish land that runs up here, QUESTION - Is there any harbor there on that little tongue? | DR, NASMYTH - No, the harbor is down in the bottom of that bay. The most interesting problem of all is the future of Constantinople. I haven't said very much about that, but Con- stantinople is going to be one of the greatest cities in the world, Let me show you why. Here is the Rhine river running up to here, connected by a canal with the Danube, and the Danube runs down here to the Black Sea, and then comes this chain of.rivers down here,- the Tigris and Buphrates rivers running down to the Persian Gulf, and beyond this map the Ganges River runs up into India, connect- ° ing with the great rivers of China. Now these rivers aren't of se much importance, but the railroads which run along the river valleys are the important features, and here you have the great highway of the land route of the world connecting the 300,000,000 people of India and the 490,000,000 people of China - great nations just coming into the economic and industrial life of the world - with these 300,000,000 people of the highly industrialized western civilizations. You can imagine what a tremendous stream of com- merce ig, going to flow through Constantinople over the land route. On the other hand, Constantinople is the crossroads of this water route, which connects this wonderful agriculture region, the granary of Odessa and Ukraine and southern Russia and out through the Black Sea, all this area of Roumania, etc., and the immense wealth of these mountains over here ~- the Cau- casus. All of that flows through the water route out into the Mediterranean and through the Atlantic and Red Sea into the Indian Ocean. Constantinople is the cross-roads of this great water-route, and this great land route is one of the great Puture cities of the world. If you compare it with London, whida has some forty million people back of it as its greatest seaport, or New York which has its hundred million people back of it as Sage eapcren entree a® 4S ay oes ~ ty ~ eee 3 4 ee at = SR ce ae ae ope PONS EES. ine et pay peta i 5 Oe Ara | gph = aes tne babes cee ee cee Aue Reon'y a ea ete i mk ; eee th a the main seaport for that hundred million people, - compare that with Constantinople which has these three hundred million people here with such differences of civilization trying to get together, you can see the possible glory of the future of the City of Constantinople there under an international government, If Constantinople belonged to the land powers, - belonged to Germany under this Bagdad Berlin railroad scheme, then there would be no outlet of the water route, and there would be another war. If, as the secret treaty provided, Constantinople went to Russia and Russia was in the position to block the land route in favor of her water route, there would be another war. The only Solution of that, of course, is to make Constantinople a free city under international control, and if that is dme if will be- come one of the great cities of the world in the future. QUESTION - You spoke a few minutes ago about its being necessary for Poland, and I suppose Czecho-Slovak to have an outlet to the sea for its economic prosperity. Now that presupposes, doesn't it, that the economic barriers should be kept out? Now if the League of Nations should take Wilson's fourteen points liter- - ally and remove economic barriers wouldn't Poland be all right even without internationalizing Danzig? DR. NASMYTH - With free trade through there - that is the only solution. The future existence, not only prosperity but existence, of these nations depends upon a real process of federatioi QUESTION - But if we have free trade we don't need that Outlet to the sea do we? DR. NASIIYTH - No, that is outlet to the sea, QUESTION - Do you think that Poland will go Bolshevik if it doesn't get its tongue of land? DR, NASMIYTH - No, it isn't the failure of the annexation policy that produces Bolshevism; it is starvation and lack of raw materials and failure to give them assurance of permanent peace and essential justice. Orlando and Sonino are threatening that if Italy doesn’t get Dalmatia and Fiume there will be a revolution, The truth is that if Dalmatia and Fiume are granted to Italy, and the whole settlement is made on the basis of imperialistic annex- ations so that these people who have gone through 211 the suffer- ing and horror face in the future simply new wars inevitably, then as the forces of Italy very clearly indicate there will be an explosion in Italy. It is failure to have enough statesmanship to settle these problems on a basis of justice and permanent peace which lead3 to policies of despair and extremism, QUESTION - The practical question comes up naturally - how are we going to get the kind of statesmanship that will lead to these things? Is there any chance at all for getting any of them? When you mention those excéllent things that should be, and when you think of the Peace Conference at present we feel as if you were-talking about the Millenium. Is there any connection at all between the present and that? DR. NASIIYTH - Wéll, the further the Peace Gonference goes the more we despair of it, I think. On the other hand, what I have been trying to point out are the fundamental principles upon which these problems must be settled in the end. I am pointing then out in this way. I believe that if there is such a bank- ruptcy of statesmanship as to sinply make an imperialistic peace of egnnexations, then the people will take power into their own hands, and when they do that they heve got to come back to these funda- mental principles that we have been discussing here, because they ‘i411 be faced with the same problems themselves - problems of rights of minorities and federation and economic interchange, etc, QUESTION - Can you tell us about any of those definite ey2etions that have been taken up - have any of them been taken up in thet soirit at all by the Peace Conference, do you know? : Sate -9- * hie DR. NASMYTH - Well, the great deadlock that is coing o now 18 over the City of Fiume and Dalmatia’ on the part of the rimiiane the Saar Valley and guarantees on the lft bank of the Rhine on the part of the French, Lloyd George and Wilson see the red spector outside the windows of the Peace Conference and are. Standing against annexations there. Italy is standing very determinedly for those annexations, and France for those annexations. The deadlock is G0ing on now and is an indication that those facts are being con- Sidered and apparently a position of ; ; : for them, Mae fs f great tenacity is being held : QUESTION - Do you think there is any prospect of Con- stantinople, for instance, being made a genuine free port under inter- national control? The mandatory idea which seems the nearest thing to it in the draft doesn't seem to promise anything. DR, NASMYTH - I should have to. know a good deal more about the psychology of the different persons in the Peace Conference and the relative strength of the forces that are contending there to be able to answer that question, Suggestion? QUESTIG:But you don't think there has been any definite DR. NASMYTH - Yes, I think that the statesmen in the conference recognize that. The best book written on the subject is by L.S, Woolf on the Future of Constantinople, in which he traces the history of the International Commission which has regue lated the commerce off the Danube and shows how that would be applied in the case of Constantinople and how perfectly it would work. QUESTION - Has Woolf any power in the Peace Conference? DR. NASMYTH + Well, Woolf is the man who wrote the Fabian Society's book on International Government which has been in- corporated pretty largely into this plan for the League of Nations. He is a very sane and practical man andeurges there that that is the only solution; that if other solutions are tried they will break down and they will have to come finally to that solution, Constanti- nople has a wonderfully interesting population, of course, = a very Strong minority of Greeks, a considerable proportion of Bulgarians, > Turks and other nationalities of that kind, - so that you could foman international cemmission out of the populations of the city itself, It is sort of an international Soviet form of commission government, and you would have to join with that, of course, some disinterested powers, The interesting thing that Woolf points out in his International Commission of the Danube is the wrong kind and the right © kind of international commissions. There was a temporary commission With representatives fron ali the EHuropean nations which was to have very limited powers and last only two years, There was a permanent commission camposed of the representatives of the powers directly _ fronting on the river Agsane - a commission composed of representatives of the six nations, which was to be the permanent commission. In * the end the thing worked out so that the temporary commission became. the permanent commission and the permanent commission became the temporary commission, because this commission of the River jdiane pow- ers which was to be the permanent commission fought within itself so hétterly and was governed by such narrow and selfish considerations that is soon went to pieces, whereas the more truly international commission, which was able to riss to lurger and higher points of yiew, transcended its temporary powers and went on to build light- houses, and dredge river channels and make docks and remove wrecks and derelicts, etc., and has been functioning right up through a large part of the war itself, So that the true principle of internationalism is to bring in disinterested forces as well as the forces directly interested, and that would apply also in the case of the true internationalization of the city of Constantinople, dine tat, fe | a, neie eae Acts oc eee paasging | erat? Ce ay Hae i; i w L re RRS: a a 0h: adhe eee Bek oa : . SCOR puagas'ioas! => | ra PERT SR tie TPF iit tte 3 “es - 1 se ig 53 Re aie her Met, ) ee TE Peg. Gir a Aa ae rie a gees ~ 4 S 3 Li eat, | er n'y 7 5 ,ey t as 4 iam + t; a d ae ne We ¥ 2 ; ! ® aertteas 4 {w Fee a HSS bey Pen ct a af Ca Tn te weyh ie ey ‘ebes: % Ske ie ae 2 gat pr meliar ey ri. ae #4 AE he Lea a é gata in a F o Efe) : ays eta lear 5 $ ’ \ ; ae i - apt ; ae ae : ie e ia He tee, SD ve i Uo geh te ats (Bnet geet “ie ; .: Ps Pee Sah Hoar? oP aae eng ee - 2 -l10- QUESTION 2 Do you mean to say that the present League of Nations draft has been affected by that book of Woolfs, Speers I q ‘ . . can t understand how that mandatory solution can come in in con+- nection with that international commission? DR. NASMYTH - No, Woolf didn't consider the questions of colonies and things of that kind with which the mandatory prin- ciple is concerned. Woolf's book on International Government pro- posed as a practical solution of the difficulty of applying the principle that all nations are equal - which is not true (Nicaragua and San Domingo’ are not as a matter of factt equal to the British Empire)- that friction of international law he proposed to solve by having one bedy in which all nations would have an equal vote and equal representation, and another body composed of representatives of great powers which would have practically everything to say about important decisions, His principles of the economic sanctions have been incorporated, It is remarkable to find them when you go through that Study of several years ago how much of it has been incorporated in the League of Nations treaty. He has a peculiarly practical mind © which sees solutions that are possible under the present conservative, more or less reactionary, governments, of the great powers, and that 1S a ground for hoping that possibly an international government of Constantinople might be set up even as a result of the Peace Confer- ence. QUESTION - Will you tell me what the attitude of the Soviet system of government is toward artists and poets, ete. Is it true that they starve? Do they want all bricklayers? DR. NASMYTH ~- It is somewhat out of the realm of terri- torial adjustments, but the information that I have is that there has never been such a flourishing of the arts and literature and theatre and drama and all of the higher flowers of civilization as has Occurred under the Soviet government. QUESTION + You were mentioning the dissatisfaction about the German treatment of Bohemia and Slovakia - will you tell me why the system of education was more oppressive there than in the east? I can't understand why they should be oppressed in the west. DR. NASMYTH - It seemed to be a part of Austria's policy “to conciliate the Poles with the idea that when a united Poland should again arise, they would be in favor of being joined to the Austrian Empire, and the Poles in Galicia were certainly the most fortunate of all the three groups in the partition. A great conflict raged within the Austrian Empire over the solutjion of the Jugo-Slav problem, and the Arch-Duke who was assassinated was in favor of. the greatest degree of freedom and tcleranes and a joining of these Jugo-Slav people. He was in favor of what was called the "triolismus" (?) - the triple policy instead of the dual - a tiple kingdom of Jugo- Slavia, Hungary and austria, instead of the dual kingdom of Austria- Hungary with all the subject nationalities. | QUESTION - What proportion of the French people does Clemenceau's annexation policy represent? DR, NASMYTH - It represents the power of the Credit Layonaisse and the Rothschilds and the Jingo Press of Franct;- the avenues of public opinion are so completely in the power of the press that there is no way of getting at what public opinion really is. QUESTION - You mentioned the internetionalization of the railway groups or trade groups that do not depend upon seaports such as the contemplated road from England through France and under the. Gibralter down to the west coast of Africa, etc., and those other very essential new trade routes, such as the Bagdad railway, of course, but is it contemplated to have those vast international trade routes internationalized? QR NASLYTH - That is, of course, the only solution, unless you get removal of economic barriers and free trade, which is the ultimate sane policy. The only safe-guard there is that they have to practice the policy of the open door. As soon as they begin to Lai te eT ne * “a 2 = . P. - ‘——- — as + Fah le, ae a i EY os ” : , io ee, fe si” . Ut 3 ieee ioe are co, ee 4, . ok? oe Rd ae ies 14 FE Pst ee fis Py pe won uh = 3 : awe ‘ mi m x z eh re ae es PENS & ae | eon i sal tie ate ak nS S ee ea a ct is aa é . ene 3 4 a : * ; ; oe ol “Sri bho E. Hoste br oe ‘ip 3 le rath Teak: Ur 4 org Pei tee pia Re. Baya pee | re ee ied Ayes Beg eoloe | At Beno) | aoe wiea? SPbs2 cone anh ae we - " ae fe fi ri A = I” Ta 13 tye ne br ea it. cp SA er : “Ost hee ag tt ite Tame PS hag ps ; r 7 ELD hla oF hod fq: fom vx) 4 . | eae veo Ba SIMA ACR ; ‘aes v5 # = F 2 ss Dip SAE Ons Fe eH Es ear ore ee BE 0: AGE eRe ee Yuen tes ‘ont Berg indo: Bi a) Sh bd Ea eg & TA EapI0N © oats r * aa ee Bw 4 & . 3 a a, e Pe ie f Bre Hi a at . c a rig PBs hots tab te te ge =! Oe Sayre nant Oreo) Bre my puke Oe fs OF 2b Be? ek fe ee PE ey bias : aT ‘7 at: SUA 2 Peat scat Vette & Age ake sa -ll- give preferential rates to their own commerce, they automatically make enemies of all the rest of the nations, and an empire like the British impire cannot afford to antagonize all the rest of the world, so that She has had no preferential tariffs in Egypt or India, and has had the principle of the open door, etc., and that would be one guarantee at least that these international routes even though they were under inter- national control would not bes preferential in their rates and treatment QUESTION - Is that Bordeaux - Bagdad railroad going to be built? Is it prospective or a fact? DR, NASMYTH - It is built with the exceptiotn of about two hundred miles in here. It would utilize existing lines running through vere, and it would depend upon the completion of that line in there, That would be only one route of course, If you get that link put in here would be a Berlin-Bagdad railroad as well as a Bordeaux-Bagdad riilroad, All of these will connect up and this new tunneling of the Pyrenees here together with the tunnel under the English Channel will help to bind ali Europe still closer together. So that if the govern- ments continue blind to the plain economic needs of that relatively limited territory there and continue to fight each other and practice the policy of economic isolation, and all the rest of the futilities of the protective system, something will break down in the near future, and those barriers will be swept away. QUESTION - I should think that there might be a great problem in regard to smuggling small ares? DR. NASMYTH - It was interesting to watch the solution that they tried to work out in the Mexican border between the United States and Mexico. There are hundreds of miles ~ thousands I guess - of desert area, and it ig impossible to put a soldier every ten feet and guard that area, What they do is to guard the railroad centers. The HlPaso railread and Sante F4 railroad that runs down through the southwest has its custom officials at every station along the line, and although there are a good many Ford automobiles that go across with as heavy loads as they can esrry, the theory is that ultimately they will have to come tc one of these freight stations for supplies or to deliver their smuggled goods,- and I presume the attempt will be made to control the air routes in the same way - by controlling the landing places. Whether it will be practicable or not is something ditficult to foresee. : The whole pressure is so irresistible towards the breaking down of those economic barriers, and the revenue obtained from it £68 so infinitesimal compared with the needs of nations burdened with the huge war debts resulting from the past five years, that I think we shall see a great weakening.of the protective principle, and the very rapid growth of the federative crinciple towards a world custom union. QUESTION - I see that President Wilson is charged with being socialistic now, and before he was charged with being imperialistic. He can't please everybody -- DR. NASMYTH - I suppose that is the unfortunate position of a liberal. He is charged dy the reactionaries as being a wild radical and by the radicals. as being @ wild reactionary, and he gets around in between the upper and the nether mill-stone, QUESTION - Would the League of Nations if it were passed help to settle the question of whether the Japanese could settle in Mexico? Would that come under the League of Nations? DR.NASHYTH - I presume it would &s being a possible cause of war, if the League is going to deal with causes of WAT ual v seems to me that the only solution in the end is to have freedom of migration as we have among the states of the Union, if we get a real federation eventually, but in the present temper of the governments, that would undoubtedly be reserved as a domestic problem for the governments themselves to deal with. Prt. cs rey wnt oe 23 at na nate t - St SR at-a8 sprukn ‘ _ - ey oe ; if ~ w ; BOT ihe ee oy Pg ¢ ah 5 me i 4 Rest i hak , Le La $j iano. m3 * re “absiay weet eg 4 ar: y hE ont, ap be a. xe tHe rages Se tn is aa A Seg LaD « QUESTION - You speak a good deal tonight about the erasure of boundary lines, I think we all feel very much in sympathy with that, but old-fashioned people seem to think that it is impossible, and I wonder why they should? I Spoke to a professor of international law a@ little while ago and said: "Why couldn't there have been a United States of Europe and of the world years ago?" And he said: "Their interests are so different; it. is impossible, “Ititen't a matter of’ Janguage; it is their interests." Well, of course, we see that the differences in Europe are much greater than the differences here, and yet our differences are also very great between the grapefruit of Jlorida and the wheat fields of Minnesota - the interests are very different, but it doesn't nake us two different nations. I can't see that the argument is sound, DR. NASLYTH - Diversity of interests is really a reason for union. The reason why the tendency toward a union between Germany and Russia is almost irresistible is because of the diversity of interests, - Russia - a great agricultural country with oil and minerals; Germany a great industrial country with locomotives and agricultural machinery, - each having the things that the other needs, That is the reason for their coming together and not for keeping them apart, The real reason in back of these people's minds who have been steeped in nationalism in our educational systems of the past is the reason given by Senator Lodge in a debate when he said: "I sm too old for a League of Nations," Met ~S } *- en, Ps oe ‘—, gic = me Se it ara Rie Vee a2 Ne: C- Aredh, « 3 gs oe ee oF grea