_ LIBRARY. UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOis URBANA Pct: SUPREME COURT OF OHIO. THE STATE OF OHIO, ON THE RELATION OF THE | ATTORNEY GENERAL, ea VS. : THE CINCINNATI GAS LIGHT AND COKE COM- PANY. Information and Pleadings in Quo Warranto. WRIGHTSON & CO.. PRINTERS. 167 WALNUT ST., 6 Ws ay Wea * uEeNPD R} bb te ie LIBRARY eae. &] 55 nae UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS URBANA SUPREME COURT ene bt hy Gb CEG). INFORMATION IN THE NATURE OF A QUO WARRANTO. ee The State of Ohio, Franklin County, ss. In the Supreme Court of the State of Ohio. December Term, A. D., 1867. William H. West, Attorney General of the State of _» Ohio, who sues for the said State in this behalf, comes here before the judges of the Supreme Court of the said “State on the = day of December, in the year eighteen ~ hundred a=d sixty-seven, at the December term thereof, ~and for the said State of Ohio, gives the said Court here ~ to understand and be informed, that the “Cincinnati Gas Light and Coke Company,” for the space of one year ) now last past and upwards, at Cincinnati, in the county "3 2 of Hamilton, to-wit: at Columbus in the county of Frank- “lin aforesaid, in the said State, have used, and still do - use, without any warrant, grant or charter, the following liberties, privileges, and franchises, to-wit: that of being a body corporate and politic in law, fact and name. by the name of “The Cincinnati Gas Lizht and Coke Com- pany, and by the same name to plevd and be impleaded unto, answer and be answered untg; and also the follow- ing liberties, privileges and franchises, to-wit: that of having, and exercising an exclusive right to open and use the streets. Janes, alleys, commons and public grounds of the City of Cincinnati, for the introduction of pipes and other apparatus for gas, for the purpose of conveying gas to the said city and citizens thereof; and also the follow- ing liberties, privileges and franchises, to-wit: that of con- veying gas through pipes and other apparatus laid in the streets, lanes, alleys, commons and publie grounds of the said City of Cincinnati, and supplying the same to said ci‘y and the citizens, and charging as, and for the price thereof, at the rate of two dollars and filty cents for every thousand cubic feet thereof, to each consumer of the same; all which said liberties, privileges and franchises the said “The Cincinnati Gas Light and Coke Company” during all the time aforesaid, have usurped, and still do usurp upon the State of Ohio to its great damage and prejudice. Whereupon, the said Attorney General prays the advice and judgment of the said Court in the premi- ses, and due prosess of law against “The Cincinniti Gas Light and Coke Company” aforesaid in this behalf, to be made, to answer to the State of Ohio, by what warrant they claim to have use and enjoy the liberties, privileges, and franchises aforesaid. W. H. WEST, Allorney General. we ri BPAR) IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO. ee ee ee mo MOVE INS: rr es THE STATE OF OHIO, ? City or CoLumBus. § To the Sheriff of Hamilton County, Greeting : SS. You are commanded to notify “The Cincinnati Gas Light and Coke Company,” that William H. West, At- torney General within and for the State of Ohio, filed an information in the nature of a Quo Warranto against them in the Supreme Court of the State of Ohio, and that they are required to answer or plead to said informa- tion within thirty days from the return of this writ. You will make due service and return of this writ forth- with. Witness my hand and the seal of said [sea] Supreme Court of Ohio, at the city of Volumbus, this 3d day of Dee. 1s67. RODNEY FOOS, Clerk Supreme Court of Ohio. IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHTO. December Term, 1867. eed Tre Cincinnati Gas Ligut aNp Cuke Company, ads Pleas THE State oF OnIO ON THE RELATION OF THE AT- 3 TORNEY GENERAL. And now in this same term, the said defendant, The Cincinnati Gas Light and Coke Company, come by E. A. Ferguson and Hoadley, Jackson and Johnson, their attorneys, and having heard the information read, say that under the color of the premises contained in said in- formation, they are greatly troubled, and this by no means justly; because, protesting that the said informa- tion, and the matters therein contained are not sufficient in law, and that they are not obliged by the law of the land to answer thereto, for plea, they say : 1. That by an Act of the General Assembly of the State of Ohio, passed on the third day of April, in the year eighteen hundred and thirty-seven, it was enacted that certain persons therein named, and their associates were thereby created a body corporate and politic with perpetual succession, by the name and style of “The 5 Cincinnati Gas Light and Coke Company,” and by that name, they and their successors were declared to be capa- ble in law of contracting and being contracted with, sue- ing and being sued, defending and being defended in all courts and places, and in all matters whatsoever, with full power to acquire, hold, occupy, and enjoy all such real and personal estate as might be necessary and praper for the construction, extension and usefulness of the works of said Company, and for the management and good gov- ernment of the same, and to have a common seal, and the same to alter, break and renew at pleasure. And it was also in and by said act, enacted that the corpora‘ion thereby created should have full power and authority to manufacture and sell gas to be made from any ard all of the substances, or a combination thereof, from which inflammable gas is usually obtained, to be used for the purvose of lighting the City of Cincinnati, or the streets thereof, and any buildings, manufactories, public places or houses therein contained, and to erect necessary works and apparatus, and to lay pipes for the purpose of conducting the gas in any of the streets or avenues of said city, but before digging up or removing any of the streets cr a'leys of said city, the said corporation was fir.t to give notice to and obtain the consent of the City Council of said city, for that purpose. And the said Cincinnati Gas Light and Coke Company further say that on the 16th day of June in the year eighteen hundred and forty-one, the said city of Cincin- n.ti, by an Ordinance passed on that day by the City Council thereof for that purpose, made a contract with James I’. Conover, whereby it was, among other things, provided that said Conover, his associates, their heirs, as- 6 signs and successors, should be vested with the full and exclusive privilege of using the streets, lanes, commons, and alleys of said City of Cincinnati, for the purpose of conveying gas to the said city and citizens thereof for the term of twenty-five years from the date thereof, and thereafter until the same should be purchased by the said city as therein provided: and that they should have full and exc'usive power and authority to open and use the streets, lanes, commons and alleys of said city for the in- troduction of pipe and other apparatus for gas: and in consideration of the privileges thereby granted, the said Conover, for himself, his associates, their heirs, assigns and successors, agreed to furnish to the said city, on the several streets, lanes, commons and alleys to which the leading or main pipes for supplying the citizens thereof with gas light should be laid and in use, such quantity of gas as might be required by the said City Council for public lamps, at two-thirds of the lowest average price at which gas should or might be furnished to private indi- viduals in the cities of New Orleans, Baltimore, New York, Louisville and Pittsburg: the lamp posts,» connecting pipes, metres and lamps being furnished by, and at the expense of the said city—and for the like price to fur- nish gas for lamps at the Engine Houses, or other public building or bridges belonging to the said city, the said last mentioned lamps being subject to the same regula- tions as the other public lamps. And it was also in said contract, among other things, provided that said Conover, his associates, their heirs and assigns, and successors, should have laid within two years from the date thereof, six thousand feet of leading pipe for gas, and should lay arnually thereafter, four thousand 7 feet of leading pipe for gas, until the principal parts of the city should be furnished with pipes, and that at any time after the expiration of the said twenty-five years, the said City Council should have the right and privilege of purchasing from the said Conover, his associ.tes, their heirs, assigns and successors, their pipes, builcings, fix- tures and other apparatus owned and used by them, in and about providing the said city and citizens thereof with gas, at a fair price and compensation: and that said price and compensation should be ascertained and deter- mined by five disinterested persons, two of whom should be selected by the said City Council,and two by the said Conover, his associates, their heirs, assigns or successors, and the fifth by the four thus selected or chosen. And the Cincinnati Gas Light and Coke Company further say, that after the making of said contract, to-wit: on the day of A. D.,184 — , the said James F. Conover, associated with himself one James H. Caldwell, and assigned and transferred one-half of the rights and privileges thereof to him: That afterwards, to-wit: on the fifth day of September, 1842, the said Cunover and Caldwell assigned and transferred the said contract and all the privileges of lighting the said City of Cincinnati, and using the streets thereof for the pur- poses mentioned in said contract, to the said Cincinnati Gas Light and Coke Company, so incorporated as afore- said, which assignment was afterwards, to-wit: on the fourteenth day of September, A, D., 1842, made known to the said City Council, who thereupon, to-wit: on said last mentioned day, by a resolution passed for that pur- pose, consented to the said assignment, subject to the 8 terms and conditions in said contract specified, from which last mentioned time, the said Cincinnati Gas Light and Coke Company have, in all respects, done and performed the things which were required by said contract to be done and performed under it, by said James F. Conover, his associates, their heirs, assign and successors. Ané the said Cincinnati Gas Light and Coke Company further say that by force of the said Act of the said General Assembly, and the provisions thereof, they still continue to be, and are, a body corporate and politic, in fact and in name, and are entitled to do all lawful acts, and to enjoy all the rights, privileges, franchises and im- munities allowed to them or conferred on them by said act, or said contract, or by the law of the land, by virtue whereof the said Cincinnati Gas Light and Coke Compa- ny, for all the time in said information in that behalf mentioned, have used and exercised the liberties, privi- leges and franchises following, to-wit: that of being a body corporate and politic in law, fact and name, by the name of the Cincinnati Gas Light and Coke Company, and by the same name, to plead and be impleaded unto, answer, and be answered unto; and also, of having and exercising an exclusive right to open and use the streets, lanes, alleys and commons of the City of Cincinnati for the introduction of pipes and other apparatus for gas, for the purpose of conveying gas to the said city and ¢'ti- zezs thereof; and also that of conveying gas through pipes and other apparatus laid in the streets, lanes, alleys and commons of the said City of Cincinnati, and supply- ing the same to the said city and the citizens, and charg- ing as and for the price thereof, at the rate of two dol- lars and fifty cents for every thousand feet thereof, to ~~ 9 each consumer of the same, other than the said city. And as to the residue of the liberties, privileges, and franchises in the said information above specified, upon the said State of Ohio, supposed to be usurped by the said Cincinnati Gas Light and Coke Company, they say they never used, nor do they now use, the residue of the said liberties, privileges and franchises: without this, that the said Cincinnati Gas Light and Coke Company, the said liberties, privileges, and franchises in said informa- tion above mentioned, or any of them, have usurped, and did usurp, upon the said State of Ohio, in manner and form as by the said information is above alleged against them; all of which the said defendants are ready to - verify and prove as the Court shall award. Wherefore they pray judgment, and that the said liberties, privileges and franchises may be ailowed and adjudged to them. 2. And for a further plea in this behalf; the defendants say, that by an Act of the General Assembly of the State of Ohio, passed on the third day of April, in the year eighteen hundred and thirty-seven, it was enacted that certain persons therein named, and their associates were thereby created a body corporate and politic, with perpetual succession, by the name and style of “The Cincinnati Gas Light and Coke Company,” and by that name they and their successors were declared to be capa- ble in law, of contracting and being contracted with, sue- ing and being sued, defending and being defended, in all courts and places and in all matters whatsoever, with full power to acquire, hold, occapy and enjoy all such real and personal estate as might be necessary and proper for 10 the construction, extension and usefulness of the works of said company, and for the management, and good government of the same, and to have a common seal, and the same to alter, break, and renew at pleasure. And it was also, in and by said Act, enacted that the corporation thereby created should have full power and authority to manufacture and sell gas, to be made from any and all of the substances, or a combination thereof, from which inflammable gas is usually obtained, to be used for the purpose of lighting the City of Cineimna‘i, or the streets thereof, and any buildings, manufacturies, public places or houses therein contained, and to erect necessary works and apparatus, and to lay pipes for the purpose of conducting the gas in any of the streets or ave- nues of said city, but before digging up or removing any of the streets or alleys of said city, the said corporation was first to give no‘ice to, and obtain the consent of the City Council of said city, for that purpose. And the said Cincinnati, Gas Light and Coke Company further say, that on the 16th day of June, in the year eighteen hundred and forty-one, the said City of Cincin- nati, by an Ordinance passed on that day, by the City Council for that purpose, made a contract with one James F. Conover, whereby it was, among other things, provi- ded that said Conover, his associates, their heirs, assigns and successors, should be vested with the full and exclu- sive privilege of using the streets, lanes, commons and alleys of s.id City of Cincinnati, for the purpose of con- — veying gas to the said city and citizens thereof, for the term of twenty-five years from the date thereof, and thereafter, until the same should be purchased by the said city as therein provided ; and that they should have full 11 and exclusive power and authority to open and use the streets, lanes, commons and alleys of said city for the in- troduction of pipe and other apparatus for gas; and in consideration of the privileges thereby granted, the said Conover, for himself, his associates, their heirs, assigns, and successors, agreed to furnish to the said city, on the several streets, lanes, commons, and alleys, to which the leading or miin pipes for supplying the citizens thereof with gas light, should be laid and in use, such quantity of gas as might be required by the said City Council for public lamps, at two-thirds of the lowest average price at which gas should or might be furnished to private indi- viduals, in the cities of New Orleans, Ballimore, New York, Louisville and Pittsburg; the lamp posts, connect- ing pipes, metres and lamps being furnished by, and at the expense of the said city, and for the like price to fur- nish gas for lamps at the engine houses, or other public buildings, or bridges belonging to the said city, the said last mentioned lamps being subject to the same regula- tions as other public lamps. And it was also in said contract, among other things, provided that said Conover, his associates, their heirs, as- signs and successors, should have laid, within two years from the date thereof, six thousand feet of leading pipe for gas, and should lay annually thereafter, four thous- and feet of leading pipe for gas, until the principal parts of the city should be furiished with pipes, and that at any time after the expiration of the said twenty-five years, the said City Council should have the right and privilege of purchasing from the said Conover, his asso- ciates, their heirs, assigns or successors, their pipes, build- 12 ings, fixtures and other apparatus owned and used by them in and about providing the said city and citizens thereof with gas at a fair price and compensation; and that said price and compensation should be ascertained and determined by five disinterested persons, two of whom should be selec‘ed by the said City Council, and two by the suid Conover, his associites, their heirs, assigns or successors, and the fifth by the four thus selected or chosen. And the said Cincinnati Gas Light and Coke Company further say, that after the making of siid contract, to- wit: on the day of , 184 , the sid James F. Conover, associated with himself one James H. Caldwell, and assigned and trinsferred one-half of all the lights and privileges thereof to him. That afterward, to-wit: on the fifth day of September, 1842, the said Conover and Caldwell assigned and transferred the said contract, and all the privileges of lighting said City of Cincinnati, and using the streets thereof for the purpose mentioned in said contract, to the said Cincinnati Gus Light and Coke Company, so incorporated as aforesaid. which assignment was afterwards, to wit: on the four- teenth day of September, A. D., 1842, made known to said City Council, who thereupon, to-wit: on said last mentioned day, by a resolution passed for that purpose, consented to the said assignmen, subject to the terms and condition in said contract specified ; from which last mentioned time, the said Cincinnati Gas Light and Coke Company have, in all respects, done and performed the things which were required, by said contract, to be done and performed under it, by said James F. Conover, his associates, their heirs, assigns and successors. 138 And the said Cincinnati Gas Light and Coke Company further say, that by the force of said Act of the General Assembly, and the provisions thereof, they still continue to be, and are a body, corporate and politic, in fact and in name, and are entitled to do all lawful acts, and to enjoy all the rights, privileges, franchises and immunities allowed to them, or conferred on them, by said Act, or said contract, or by the law of the land; by virtue whereof, the said Cincinnati Gas Light and Coke Compa- ny, for all the time in said information in that behalf mentioned, and for twenty years prior to the filing of the same, have used and exercised the liberties, privileges and franchises following, to-wit: that of beinga body cor- porate and politic in law, fact and name, by the name of The Cincinnati Gas Light and Coke Company, and by the same name to plead and be impleaded unto, answer and be answered unto, and also of having and exercising an exclusive right to open and use the streets, lanes, al- leysand commons of the City of Cincinnati, for the in- troduction of pipes and other apparatus for gas; for the purpose of conveying gas to the said city and citizens thereof; and also that of conveying gas through pipes and other apparatus laid in the streets, lanes, alleys and commons of the said City of Cincinnati, and supplying the same to the said city and citizens thereof, at the rate of two dollars and fifty cents for every thousand cubic feet thereof, to each consumer of the same, other than the said city. And as to the residue of the liberties, privileges and franchises in the said information above specified, upon the said State of Ohio, supposed to be usurped by the said Cincinnati Gas Light and Coke Company, they say 14 they never used, nor do they now use, the residue of said liberties, privileges and franchises—without this—that the said Cincinnati Gas Light and Coke Company, the said liberties, privileges, and franchises in said informa- tion above mentioned, or any of them, have usurped or did usurp, upon the said State of Ohio, in manner and form as by the said information, is above alleged against them; all which the said defendants are ready to verify and prove, as the Court shall award. Wherefore, they pray judgment, and that the sad liber- ties, privileges, and franchises may be allowed and ad- judged to them. 8. And for a further plea in this behalf the defend- ants say, that by an Act of the General Assembly of the State of Ohio, passed on the third day of April, in the year eighteen hundred and thirty-seven, it was enacted that certain persons therein named, and their associates, were thereby created a body corporate and _ politic, with perpetuil succession by the name and style of “The Cincinnati Gas Light and Coke Company,” and by that name, they and their successors were declared to be capa- ble in law of contracting and being contracted with, sue- ing and being sued, detending and being defended, in all courts and places, and in all matters whatsoever, with full power to acquire, hold, occupy and enjoy all such real and personal estate as might be necessary and proper for the construction, extension and usefulness of the works of said company, and for the management and good govern- ment of the same, and to have a common seal, and the same to alter, break, and renew at pleasure. ) And it was also, in and by said Act, enacted that the 15 corporation thereby created, should have full power and authorily to manufacture and sell gas to be made from any and all of the substances, or a combination thereof, from which inflammable gas is usually obtained, to be used for the purpose of lighting the City of Cincinnati, or the streets thereof, and any buildings, manulfactories, public places. or houses therein contained, and to erect necessary works and apparatus, and to lay pipes for the purpose of conducting the gas, in any of the streets or avenues of said city. And the said Cincinnati Gas Light and Coke Company farther say, that by force of the said Act of the said General Assembly, and the provisions thereof, they still continue to be. and are a body corporate and politic in fact and in name, and are entitled to do all lawful acts, and to enjoy all the rights, privileges, franchises, and im- munities allowed to them, or conf rred on them by said Act, or by the law of the land; by virtue whereof, the said Cincinnati Gas Light and Coke Company, fcr all the time in said information in that behalf mentioned, and for twenty years prior to the filing of the same, h-ve used and exercised the liberties, privileges and franchises fol- lowing. to-wit: that of being a body corporate and poli- tic in law, fact and name, by the name of the Cincinnati Gas Light and Coke Company, and by the same name to plead and be impleaded unto; answer and be answered unto; and also of having and exercising an exclusive right to open and use the streets, lanes, alleys and com- mons of the City of Cincinnati for the introduction of pipes and other apparatus for gas, for the purpose of conveying gas to the said city and citizens thereof; and also that of conveying gas through pipes and other appa- 16 ratus laid in the streets, lanes alleys and commons of the said City of Cincinnati, and supplying the same to the said city and the citizens thereof, and charging as and for the price thereof, at the rate of two dollarsand fifty cents for every thousand cubic feet thereof, to each consumer of the same, other than the said city. And as to the residue of the liberties, privileges and franchises in the said information above specified, upon the State of Ohio, supposed to be usurped by the said Cincinnati Gas Light and Coke Company, they say they never used, nor do they now use, the residue of the said liberties, privileges and franchises—without this—that the said Cincinnati Gas Light and Coke Company, the said liberties, privileges, and franchises in said informa- tion above mentioned, or any of them, have usurped, and did usurp, upon the said State of Ohio, in manner and form, as by the said information is above alleged against them; all of which the said defendants are ready to verify and prove, as the Court shall award. Wherefore, they pray judgment, and that the said liberties, privileges and franchises may be allowed and adjudged to them. 4. And for a further plea in this behalf, the said Cin- cinnati Gas Light and Coke Company say that hereto- fore, to-wit: on the 24th day of September, 1858, T. A. O’Conner, then being the Prosecuting Attorney of Hamil- ton county, in sud State of Ohio, upon the relation of Samuel M. Hart, upon leave granted in the vacation of the District Court of the State of Ohio, in and for the fifth circuit thereof, being the said county of Hamilton, by the Honorable, A. G. W. Carter, one of the judges of re tT said Court, filed an information in the nature of guo war- ranto in the said District Court, whereby the said Prose- cuting Attorney for the said State of Ohio, gave the Court then to understand and be informed, that the said Cincinnati Gas Light and Coke Company, was a corpo- ration, having the principal place of business in the City of Cincinnati, county of Hamilton aforesaid, created by and under the laws of the State of Ohio, organized pur- suant to an Act of the Legislature, entitled “ An Act to Incorporate the Cincinnati Gas Light and Coke Com- pany,” passed April 3d, 1837, and the Acts amending the same. That by the terms and provisions of said Act incorporation, the said Cincinnati Gas Light and Coke Company was empowered and authorized to manufacture and sell gas to be made from any or all of the substances, or a combination thereof, from which inflammable gas is usually obtained, and to be used for the purpose of light- ing the City of Cincinnati, or the streets thereof, and any buildings, manufactories, public places or houses therein contained, and to erect necessary works and apparatus and to lay pipes for the purpose of conducting the gas in, any of the streets, or avenues of the said city. That it was further enacted by section six of said Act, that any future Legislation might alter, modify or repeal said Act. That by the terms of an Act of the Legisla- ture, entitled “ An Act to amend an Act to provide for the organization of cities and incorporated villages,” passed March 11, 1853, the said Act of incorporation was so altered and modified that the City Council of said Ciry of Cincinnati was authorized and empowered to regulate by ordinance of said City Council, from time to time, the price which said Cincinnati Gas Light and Coke 18 Company should charge for any gas furnished by said Company to the citizens, public buildings, lanes, streets or alleys in said City of Cincinnati. And that it was further enacted by the terms of provisions of said Act, that the said Company should in no event charge more for any gas furnished to said city or to individuals, than the specified by Ordinance of said City Council. And that it was further provided by said Act that a neglect to furnish gas to the citizens or other consumers of gas, or to said City of Cincinnati, by said Company, in conformity to the provisions of said Act, and in accor- dance with the prices fixed and established by Ordinance of said City Council, from time to time, should forfeit all rights of said Company under the charter by which it had been established. That in pursuance of the said authority so conferred, the said City Council of Cincinnati, on August 31,1853, duly passed an Ordinance entitled “ An Ordinance regula- ting the price which the Cincinnati Gas Light and Coke Company should charge for gas furnished by said Com- pany to the citizens, or for pub‘ic buildings, streets, lanes, alleys, public landings, and commons, in the City of Cin- cinnati;” whereby it was ordained by sud City Council of the City of Cincinnati, that from and after the first day of September, in the year 1853, the price which the Cincinnati Gas Light and Coke Company, should charge for gas furnished by said Company to the Citizens or pri- vate consumers, or for public buildings, council-chamber, offices, court-rooms, station or engine-houses, including buildings owned by the county of Hamilton, should be two dollars and twenty-five cents for each thousand cubic feet and no more. 18 That the said defendant, the Cincinnati Gas Light and Ceke Company had wholly disregarded the requirements and obligations imposed upen it by said Ordinance of the City Ceuncil, and had failed, neglected, and refused, at the county aforesaid, to furnish gas to the citizens and other consumers ef gas, in said City of Cincinnati, at the rate per thousand cubic feet as fixed and established by said City Council as aforesaid, and the said defendant had wrongfully and persistently exacted from the said citizens and ether consumers of gas, at least two dollars and fifty cents for each and every thousand eubie feet of gas consumed by said citizens and other consumers of gas; and the said Cincinnati Gas Light and Coke Com- pany had thereby worked a forfeiture of its cerporate rights, privileges and franchises. Wherefore judgment was demanded, that the defen- dant, the Cincinnata Gas Light and Coke Company, be excluded from all corporate rights, privileges and franchi- ses, and that said corporation be disselved. That afterwards, to-wit: on the 29th day of October, A. D., 1858, the said Cincinnati Gas Light and Coke Company filed in said District Court their several pleas to said infermatien, the first ef which was as fellows: “ And now the defendants, the Cincinnati Gas Light “ and Ceke Company come by their attorney, and having “ heard the said information read, they say they ought “ not to be troubled by the said State ef Ohio, by reason “ of the premises in said information specified, because “ protesting that the said information and the matters «therein contained, are not sufficient in law, te which “ said Cincinnati Gas Light and Coke Cempany are not “ hound to answer unto, by the law of the land, yet for 20 “ plea in this behalf, say that the Legislature of the State “of Ohio, by a certain Act passed on the third day of “ April, in the year 1837, entitled ‘An Act to incorpo- “rate the Cincinnati Gas Light and Coke Company,’ * did enact that the persons therein named, and their as- “ sociates and successors, should be created a body cor- “porate and politic, with perpetual succession, by the « name of the Cincinnati Gas Light and Coke Company, “ and by that name should be capable of contracting and “ being contracted with, sueing and being sued, and have full power to acquire, hold, occupy and enjoy all such “real and personal estate as might be necessary and “ proper for the construction, extension and usefulness of “the works of siid Company. That said Company “ should have full power and authority to manufacture * and sell gas, to be used for the purpose of lighting the “ City of Cincinnati, or the streets thereof, and any build- “ ings, manufactories, public places, or houses therein con- “ tained, and to erect necessary works and apparatus, “ and to lay pipes for the purpose of conducting the gas, “in any of the streets or avenues of the said city.” “ It was also provided in and by said Act, that said “ Company should be liable in its corporate capacity, in “all the capital stock, moneys and effects, for all the “ debt or debts at any time owing by said Company, and “ the effects of said Company be insufficient to satisfy all “ demands against the same, then the individual stock- “ holders of said Company should be held individually “ liable for ali unsatisfied claim against the Company in “ proportion to the amount of stock held or owned by — “them respectively, and by the sixth section of the Act “ it was provided that any future legislation might modify, 21 “ alter or repeal said Act. All of which will more fully “ appear, by reference to said act of incorporation.” “They further say that on the 16th day of June, 1841, “ the City of Cincinnati, by Ordinance passed by the City “ Council of Cincinnati, of that date, entered into a con- “ tract with James I. Conover, in which Ordinance and “ contract, it was ordained that said Conover, his asso- “ ciates, their heirs and assigns, should be, and they were “ thereby vested with the full and exclusive privilege of “using the streets, lanes, commons and alleys of said “ City of Cincinnati, in the State of Ohio, for the pur- “pose of conveying gas to the said city and citizens “ thereof, for the term of twenty-five years from the date “ thereof, and thereafter until the same should be pur- “ chased by the City Council of Cincinnati, as therein “ provided for, and should have full and exclusive power “and authority to open and use the streets, lanes, com- “ mons and alleys for the introduction of pipe and other “ apparatus for gas; and in consideration of the privileges “thereby granted to said Conover, his associates, their “ heirs and assigns, he and they should furnish to the said “ city, on the several streets, lanes, commons and alleys “in which the leading or main pipes for supplying the “ citizens with gas light should be laid and in use, such “ quantity of gas as might be required by the City Coun- “ cil for public lamps, at two-thirds of the lowest aver- “ age price at which gas should or might be furnished to “ private individuals in the cities of New Orleans, Balti- “ more, New York, Louisville, and Pittsburgh ; the lamp “ posts, connecting pipes, meters, and lamps being fur- “ nished by and at the expense of said city.” “ It was further provided in and by said Ordinance 22 “ and contract, that the privileges thereby granted should “ not be forfeited by any temporary failure on the part “ of said Conover, and his associates, their heirs and “ assigns, to perform any of the conditions from them “ exacted, (except as to the commencement of said works) “ when such failures are occasioned by aceident, untoward “ events, or the want of necessary repairs in the ma. “ chinery or apparatus of said gas works.” “Tt was further provided, that any time after the expi- “ration of the said twenty-five years, the said City “ Council should have the right and privilege of pur- “cha mg from said Conover, his associates, their heirs “ and assigns or suceessors, their pipes, buildings, fixtures “and other apparatus, owned and used by them, in and “ about providing the city and crttzens with gas, at a fair “ price and compensation, which price was to be ascer- “tained and determined by five disinterested persons, two “ of whom should be seleeted by the City Couneil, and “ two by said Conover, his associates, their heirs, assigns “ or suecessors, and the fifth by the four thus selected or “ chosen, the terms of which Ordinance were accepted “ by said James F. Conover, who, afterwards, on the “ day of assigned and trarsferred the one- “half of said contract, and all the nghts and privileges “ thereof, to James H. Caldwell.” “ The defendants further say, that after the Cineinnati “ Gas Light and Coke Company become duly organized “under said charter, the said James F. Conover and “ James H. Caldwell, for valuable consideration, on the = day of assigned . and transferred the “said contract, and all the privileges of lighting the said “City of Cincinnati, and using the streets thereof for 23 “the purposes mentioned in said contract, to the Cincin- “nati Gas Light and Coke Company, so incorporated as “ aforesaid, and waich assignment was afterwards made “ known to the City Council of the City of Cincinnati, “on the 14th day of September, 1842, on which day “ the said City Council passed a resolution, which after “reciting said assignment, resolved that the Council “thereby recognize the said Cincinnati Gas Light and “ Coke Company, as the assignee of all the rights and “ privileges granted to the said James F. Conover, and “ his assigns, upon the terms and conditions which are “ specified in the said Ordinance of the 16th of June, “1841. And the defendants insist, by virtue of said “ Ordinance so made, and of the acceptance thereof, by “said James F. Conover, and by virtue of the assignments “ so made as aforesaid, the defendants become invested “with the exciusive privilege of lighting the City of “ Cincinnati with gas, and of furnishing the city and citi-. “ zens of Cincinnati with gas for the period of twenty- “ five years upon the terms mentioned and set forth in “ said Ordinance, and which contract they claim can not “ be altered, modified, or in any way changed, by any “ legislation of the State of Ohio, or by any Ordinance “of the City Council of the City of Cincinnati, and de- “‘fendants deny that the City of Cincinnati has ever “ been charged a larger price fur gas consumed by said “city on the several streets, lanes, commons and alleys “ of suid city, than two-thirds of the lowest average price “at which gas has been furnished to private individu- ‘‘ als in the cities of New Orleans, Baltimore, New York, “ Louisville and Pittsburgh.” “And the defendants deny that the Legislature or 24 “ General Assembly of the State of Ohio, has ever passed “any law altering or modifying the said Act entitled ‘An “ Act to incorporate the Cincinnati Gas Light and Coke “Company. All of which the defendants are ready to “ verify and plead in bar of the plaintiff’s proceedings.” “ And afterwards, to-wit: on the 5th day of May, “ 1859, the said State of Ohio filed its demurrer to the “ said first plea of the said Cincinnati Gas Light and ‘¢ Coke Company, averring that the same, and the mat- “ ters and things therein set forth, were not sufficient in “law to bar or preclude the State of Ohio from having and “ maintaining its said action against the said Cincinnati “ Gas Light and Coke Company, and by reason of the “ insufficiency of said plea in that behalf, the said State “ of Ohio prayed judgment, &c.” That afterwards, to-wit: on the llth day of May, in the April term of said District Court, 1859, the following judgment was entered in said cause, to-wit: | “This cause came on to be heard on the plea filed by “ the defendant and the demurrer of the piaintiff thereto, ‘and was argued by counsel, and the Court having duly “ considered the same, find the said first plea filed, is “ valid in law, and that the facts in said plea set forth, “are a bar to the relief sought by the plaintiff in the in- “ formation in this cause. It is therefore ordered and “ adjudged that the demurrer filed by said plaintiff, be “ overruled; and the plaintiff not desiring to proceed “ further in the case, ib is further ordered and adjudged “ that the plaintifi’s information be dismissed, and that “ the defendant go hence without day.” All of which will more fully appear by the record of said case now remaiuing in the said District Court. 25 And the said Cincinnati Gas Light and Coke Com- pany, further say that said judgment of said District Court, is in full force and unreversed. And the said Cincinnati Gas Light and Coke Compa- ny, have claimed, and yet do claim to have, use and enjoy all the liberties, privileges and franchises to them belong- ing, by virtue of the aforesaid Act of the said Legisla- ture, and the said contract as it was adjudged by the said District Court, lawful for them to do, without this, that the said Cincinnati Gas Light and Coke Company have charged the said city, as and for the price of gas fur- nished to it, at the rate of two dollars aud tifty cents for every thousand cubic feet thereof; and without this, that the said Cincinnati Gas Light and Coke Company have usurped the said liberties, privileges and franchises upon the said State of Ohio, in manner and form as by the said information is above supposed. All of which said several matters and things they, the said Cincinnati Gas Light and Coke Company are ready to verify as the Court shall award. Wherefore, they pray judgment, and that the afore- said liberties and franchises, in form aforesaid claimed by them, may, for the future be allowed to them, and that they may be dismissed and discharged by the Court hereof, and from the premises aforesaid, HK. A. FERGUSON. Hoap.ey, JACKSON & JOHNSON, Attorneys for Defendant. IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO. December Term, 1867. Pad In Quo Warranto. THE STATE OF OHIO — Replications THE CINCINNATI GAS LIGHT, >» and AND COKE COMPANY. na And the said William H. West, Attorney General of the State of Ohio, who for the said State prosecutes in this behalf as to the said pleas of the said Cincinnati Gas Light and Coke Company, by it first and secondly above pleaded, saith, that for anything therein alleged, the said State ought not to be barred from having and maintaining its aforesaid information, because, protesting that the said pleas are insufficient in law, for replication, nevertheless, in this behalf, the said Attorney General saith that true it is that the General Assembly of the State of Ohio, on the 3d day of April, 1837, passed the Act in said pleas stated, but the said Attorney General further saith, that neither the said Cincinnati Gas Light and Coke Company. nor the persons acting under such name and style, are the persons named in said Act of the 27 General Assembly, nor their associates, nor the successors of such persons, or of their associates, and this he prays may be inquired of by the country, &c. And the said William 4. West, Attorney General for a further replication in this behalf saith, that true it is that the General Assembly of the State of Ohio on the dd day of April, 1837, passed the Act in said pleas sta- ted, and that the City Council of the City of Cincinnati, on the 16th day of June, 1841, passed the Ordinance in said pleas stated, but the said Attorney General further saith, that the said Cincinnati Gas Light and Coke Com- pany did not during the time mentioned in said informa- tion, nor at any time, have or exereise an exelusive right to open and use the streets, lanes, alleys and commons of said city for the introduction of pipes and other apparatus for gas, for conveying gas to the said city and citizens thereof as alleged in said pleas, or otherwise, and this he prays may be inquired of by the country, &e. And the said William H. West, Attorney General, for a further replication in this behalf saith that true it is that the said Cincinnati Gas Light and Coke Company did charge as the price of gas supphed and furnished to the citizens of said City of Cincinnati, at the rate of two dollars and fifty cents for every thousand cubic feet there- of, as alleged in said pleas, but the said Attorney General further saith that the said General Assembly, by an Act passed on the 5th day of April, 1854, provided: “That “after the passage of this Aet it shail be lawful for the “City Couneil of any city in which a gas company has “been or may be hereafter established, to fix from time “to time, by Ordinance the minimum price at which such “ council shall require such eompany te furnish gas to the 28 “ citizens or public buildings of such city, or for the pur- “ pose of lighting the alleys and public grounds thereof “for any period not exceeding ten years; and from and “ after the assent of said company to such Ordinance, by “a written acceptance thereof, filed in the Clerk’s office of “ such city, it shall not be lawful for said City Council to “ require the said company to furnish gas to the citizen’s, “ public buildings, public grounds or public lamps of such “ city ata less price during the period agreed on, not ex- “ ceeding ten years as aforesaid; provided that this Act “ shall not operate to impair or effect any contract here- “‘ tofore made between any city and gas light, or gas light “and coke company,” and that the City Council of the City of Cincinnati, on the 14th day of August, 1867, by an Ordinance duly passed provided, “That for the period “ of one year from and after the first day of September, “ A. D., 1867, the Cincinnati Gas Light and Coke Com- “nany shall furnish gas of the standard quality to the “ public buildings of the City of Cincinnati, and to citi- ‘* zens or private consumers at the rate of two dollars for “ each one thousand cubic feet so furnished, and shall not “‘ charge any greater sum than that herein specified ; “ provided, however, nothing herein is to be construed as ‘a waiver by the city of her right to obtain possession “ of the works of said company as provided by contract: “ therewith.’ And this he is ready to verify and there- fore prays judgment, Xe. And as to the said pleas of the said Cincinnati Gas Light and Coke Company, by it thirdly and fourthly above pleaded, the said William H. West, Attorney Gen- eral of the State of Ohio comes and says that the same @re not, nor 1s either of them sufficient in law to bar the 29 said State from having and maintaining the aforesaid in- formation against it, the said Cincinnati Gas Light and Coke Company, and he the said William H. West, Attor- ney General is not bound by the law of the land to an- swer the same, and this he is ready to verify, wherefore, for want of a sufficient plea and answer in this behalf he prays judgment, and that the said Cincinnati Gas Light and Coke Comp:ny with the said liberties, privileges and franchises may in no way intermeddle, but may be alto- gether excluded from the same. W. H. WEST, Attorney General. iN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO, ~~" —— December Term, 1867 —e eee Quo Warranio, THE STATE OF OHIO ws Rejoinders THE CINCINNATI GAS LIGHT( 7 and i AND CGKE COMPANY. DEMUTTELS» And the said defendant at the same term now comes and as to the first replication of the said State says that the same is not in law a sufficient replication to the mat- ters and things in said first and second pleas pleaded nor is it bound to answer to said replication, and this it is ready to verify, wherefore it prays judgment. 2. And as to the said second replication of the said State, said defendant saith that in law it isnot a sufficient replication to the matter and things by it pleaded, nor is it bound to answer the same—further, and for cause of special demurrer it shows that said replication does not aver that any person or corporation other than this defen- dant did, during the time mentioned in said information have or exercise any right to open and use the streets, lanes, alleys and commons of said city for the introduc- 81 tion of pipes and other apparatus for gas, for conveying gas to the said city and citizens thereof, and this it is ready to verify, wherefore it prays judgment. 3. And as to the said third replication of the said State, said defendant protesting that the same is insuffi- cient in law, and that it ought not to be obliged to make answer thereto, nevertheless for rejoinder saith that in and by a certain decree in chancery of the Circuit Court of the United States within and for the 6th Circuit and Southern District of Ohio in a certain cause therein pen- ding, wherein said Court had acquired jurisdiction, and in which Sophia C. Deane was complainant and this de- fendant, and the City of Cincinnati, and others were de- fendants, and had appeared as such at the October term, 1867, it was by the judgment and consideration of said Court in Equity sitting decreed that this defendant should be and it thereby was and now is enjoined and re- strained from obeying, and the said city and all citizens thereof from enforcing or attempting to enforce said Ordinance by said City Council on the 16th day of August, 1867, passed and which is the same Ordinance in said replication alleged, which decree was when said information was filed and is still in full force and effect, and this the defendant is now hereby to show for the in- spection of this Court, as by the 1ecords and proceedings in said Circuit Court will more fully appear, reference whereto is now here had and made, and this itis ready to verify, and therefore prays judgment. 4. And further as to the said third replication of the said State, said defendant protesting that the same is in- sufficient in law, and that it ought not to be obliged to make answer thereto, nevertheless, for further rejoinder 32 saith that it never has assented to said Ordinance, nor has it in writing filed in the Clerk’s office of said city or otherwise accepted the same, and this it is ready to verify, and therefore prays judgment. 5. And for further rejoinder to the said third replica- tion of the said State said defendant protesting that the same is insufficient in-law, and that it ought not to be compelled to make answer thereto, nevertheless, for fur- ther rejoinder saith that on the first day of March, 1867, the City Council of the City of Cincinnati passed the fol- lowing resolution : Resolved, That the City Council do now proceed to select and appoint two disinterested persons, to act on behalf of the city to ascertain a fair price and compen- sation that shall be paid by the City of Cincinnati for the C.ncinnati Gas Light and Coke Company’s works, and all the appurtenances thereto belonging. And said resolution having been passed, said City Council appointed Miles Greenwood and Henry Kessler as such appraisers, both of whom then were and still are gas consumers and tax payers in said city, and said Kessler was then and still is an officer of said city, to- wit : a trustee of the water-works thereof: And then and there the said City Council directed the Mayor of said city to notify the defendant of the pass- age of said resolution, and the choice of said appraisers, and to request this defendant to appoint a like number of appraisers, that said gas works might be fully and fairly valued and placed in possession of said city in accordance with said contract, which said Mayor then and there by writing to that effect did. And afterward on the day of 1867, . 4 ae 33 this defendant in the belief that the said city did intend to purchase the property and rights of this company, at the valuation fixed by an appraisement by five disinter- ested appraisers, as 1t might lawfully do, did appoint Henry Day, Esq, of New York City, and Oliver G. Steele, Esq., of Buffalo, two competent, impartial and disinterested persons as appraisers on its behalf, and thereupon said Kessler, Greenwood, Day and Steele met at said city afterwards, upon the 18th day of May, and at divers other days and times, ‘by adjournment, for the purpose of selecting a fifth appraiser under said contract, and then proceeding to value said property and rights, and said Day and Steele offered and proposed to said Greenwood and Kessler the following names of competent, impartial and disinterested persons, any one of whom they were ready and willing to unite with said Kessler and Greenwood in appointing as fifth appraiser as afore- said, viz.: Hon. James Speed, of Louisville, Kentucky, late Attorney General of the United States; Hon. Bland Ballard, of the same city, Judge of the United States District Court for the District of Kentucky; Hon. Joseph R. Swan, of Columbus, Ohio, once a Judge of this Court; John W. Andrews, Esq., of the same city ; Hon. Charles T. Sherman, of Cleveland, Ohio, Judge of the District Court of the United States for the Northern District of Ohio; Hocking H. Hunter, Esq., of Lan- caster, Ohio; Henry B. Payne, Esq., of Cleveland, Ohio; Hon. William H. West, of Bellefontaine, Ohio, Attorney General as aforesaid; Theodore R. Scowden, of Cleveland, Ohio; Oran Follett, of Sandusky City, Ohio; R. A. Harrison, Esq., of London, Ohio; Simon Gebheart, Esq., 3 / 34 of Dayton, Chio; Samuel Williamson, Esq., of C’eveland, Ohio; M. R. Waite, Esq., of Toledo, Chio, and Reuben Hitchcock, Esq., of Painsville, Ohio, each and every one of which said Kessler and Greenwood rejected and refused to select as said fifth appraiser, and in lieu thereof, said Greenwood and Kessler proposed the fol- lowing named persons, any one of which they were willing to choose as said fifth appraiser, viz.: Wiliam Hooper, Lewis Worthington, Thompson Neave, George W. Skzats, Jason Evans and David Sinton, of Cincinnati, Ohio; Dr. Oliver W. Nixon, of Columbia, Ohio, and Abraham M. Taylor, of Burlington, New Jersey, all of whom were then and are now tax-payers and gas con- sumers of Cincinvati aforesaid, and said Nixon was and is in the employ of said Greenwood, and each of the said persons being rejected by said Day and Steele for said reason, said Greenwood and Kessler then and there declared and avowed that they would consent to elect no one as such fifth appraiser, unless he should be interested in the result thereol, by being a tax payer of said city, or otherwise subject to the influences of the interests of the government and people of said city. All which action of said Kessler and Greenwood was prompted and suggested by a Committee appointed by the sud City Council, for the pretended purpose of attending to the interests of said city and representing her bcfore said appraisers, and was in collusion with, and in pursuance of, a secret underst nding with a majority of the members of said City Council, and for the fraudulent purpose of depriving this defendant of a fair and honest appraise- ment, and full compensation for its said property and rights. And this defendant alleges that in furtherance <4 35 of sud fraudulent purpose, a secret meeting was held at the office of one of the members of said. Committee, at which were present a majority of the members of said City Council, viz.: Being those only who were privy to said design, and their attorneys, and at said meeting it was resolved by those present, that for the purpose of compelling this defendant to waive any objection it might lawfully make to the choice of a fifth appraiser, who should be partial and interes‘ed, and for the purpose of preventing a f.ir and honest appraisement aforesaid, and for the purpose of harassing and impeding the defendant in the management of its property, aud throwing doubts over the value of its franchises during the further progress of such appiaisement, the ordinance described in said replication should be passed by said City Council and enforced upon this defendant, said persons composirg said meeting well knowing that the price named in said ordinance was not, and is not, an adequate and fair price and comyensation for gas in said city, and believing th's defendant would sooner submit to an unjust and inade- quate appraisement than to the enforcement of such an ordinance, and thereupon to carry out said fraudulent purpose, said ordinance was introduced into said Council, and by the same members of said Council who composed said secret meeting, adopted as an ordinance of said city, all which actings and doings were, and are, dishonest and unlawful, and abusive of the power gran‘ed to said Council for the government of said city and the manage- ment of itsaffairs. Wherefore it says that said ordinance has no binding force and efficacy as an ordinance or | .w of said city. And this itis ready to verily, and there- fore prays Judgment, ete. 56 And the said Cincinnati Gas Light and Coke Company for a further rejoinder on this behalf, says that the said State of Ohio ought not to be admitted or received to plead the said replication, by it thirdly above pleaded, because it says that heretofore, to-wit : On the 24th day of September, 1858, T. A. O’Connor, then being the Prosecuting Attorney of Hamilton County, in said State of Ohio, upon the relation of Samuel M. Hunt, upon leave granted in the vaction of the District Court of the State of Ohio, in and for the Fifth Circuit thereof, being the said County of Hamilton, by the Hon. A. G. W. Carter, one of the Judges of said Court, filed an information in the nature of quo warranto in the said District Court, whereby the said Prosecuting Attorney for the said State of Ohio, gave the Court then to understand and be informed, that the said Cincinnati Gas Light and Coke Company was a corporation, having the principal place of business in the city of Cincinnati, County of Hamilton aforesaid, created by and under the laws of the State of Ohio, organized pursuant to an Act of the Legislature, entitled “An Act to incorporate the Cincinnati Gas Light and Coke Company,” passed April 3, 1837, and the acts amending the same. That by the terms and provisions of said Act of incorporation, the said Cincinnati Gas Light and Coke Company was empowered and authorized to manufacture and sell gas, to be made from any or all of the substances, or a combination thereof, from which inflammable gas is usually obtained, and to be used for the purpose of lighting the city of Cincinnati, or the streets thereof, and any buildings, manufactories, public places, or houses therein contained, and to erect necessary works and apparatus, and to lay 37 pipes for the purpose of conducting the gas in any of the streets or avenues of the said city. That it was further enacted by Section 6 of said Act, that any future legislation might alter, modify or repeal said Act. That by the terms of an Act of the Legislature, entitled ““An Act to amend an Act to provide for the organization of cities and incorporated villages,” passed March 11, 1853, the said Act of incorporation was so altered and modified that the City Council of said city of Cincinnati, was authorized and empowered to regulate by ordinance of said City Council, from time to time, the price which said Cincinnati Gas Light and Coke Company should charge for any gas furnished by said Company to the citizens, public buildings, lanes, streets or alleys in said city of Cincinnati. And that it was further enacted by the terms of provisions of said Act, that the said Company should in no event charge more for any gas furnished to said city, or to individuals. than the price specified by ordinance of the City Council. And that it was further provided by said Act that a neglect to furnish gas to the citizens or other consumers of gas, or to the said city of Cincinnati, by said Company, in conformity to the provisions of said Act, and in accordance with the prices fixed and established by Ordinance of said City Council, from time to time, should forfeit all rights of said Company under the charter by which it had been established. That in pursuance of the said authority so conferred, the said City Council of Cincinnati, on August 31, 1853, duly passed an Ordinance, entitled, “ An Ordinance regu- lating the price which the Cincinnati Gas Light and Coke 38 Company should charge for gas furnished by said Com- pany to the citizens, or for public buildings, streets, lanes, alleys, pubic landings and commons in the city of Ciacinaati,” whereby it was ordained by said City Council of the city of Cincinnati, that from and after the first lay of September, in the year 1853, the price which the Cincinnati Gas Light and Coke Company should charge for gas furnished by said Company to the citizens or private consumers, or for public baildings, Council Chamber, offices, court-rooms, station or engine-houses, including buildings owned by the County of Hamilton, should be two dollars and twenty-five cents for each thousand cubic feet and no more. That the said defendant, the Cincinnati Gas Light and Coke Comp iny, had wholly disregarded the requirements and obligations imposed upon it by said ordinance of the City Council, and had failed, neglected and refused, at the county aforesaid, to furnish gas to the citizens and other consumers of gas, in said city of Cincinnati, at the rate per thousand cubic feet as fixed and established by said City Council aforesaid, and the said defendant had wrongfully and persistently exacted from the said citizens and other consumers of gas, at least two dollars and fifty cents for each and every thousand cubic feet of gas con- sumed by said citizens and other consumers of gas; and the said Cincinnati Gas Light and Coke Company had thereby worked a forfeiture of its corporate rights, privi- leges and franchises, Wherefore judgment was demanded that the defendant, the Cincinnati Gas Light and Coke Company, be excluded from all corporate rights, privileges and franchises, and that said corporation be dissolved. 59 That afterward, to wit: On the 29th day of October, A. D. 1858, the said Ciccinnati Gas Light and Coke Company filed in said District Court their several p'eas to said information, the first of which was as follows: “And now the defendants, the Cincinnati Gas Light “and Coke Company, come by their attorney, and having “heard the s.idinformation read, they say they ought not “to be troubled by the said State of Ohio, by reason of “the premises in said information specified, because, pro- “testing that the said information and the matters therein “con‘ained, are not sufficient in law, to which said Cincin- “nati Gas Light and Coke Company are not bound to “answer unto by the law of the land, yet for plea in this “behalf, say that the Legis‘ature of the State of Ohio, by “a certain Act passed on the third day of April, in the “ vear 1837, entitled ‘An Act to incorporate the Cincinnati “Gas Light and Coke Company,’ did enact that the persons “therein named, and their associates and successors, should “be created a body, corporate and politic, with perpetual “succession, by the name of the Cincinnati Gas Light and “Coke Company, and by that name should be capable of “contracting and being contracted with, sueing and being “sued, and have full power to acquire, hold, occupy and “enjoy all such real and personal estate as might be “necessary and proper for the construction, extension and ‘usefulness of the works of said Company. «That said Company should have full power and “authority to manufacture and sell gas, to be uscd for the “purpose of lighting the City of Cincinnati, or the streets “ thereof, and any buildings, manufactories, public places, “or houses therein contained, and to erect necessary works ‘and apparatus, and to lay pipes for the purpose of con- 40 “ducting the gasin any of the streets or avenues of said “city. “Tt was also provided in and by said Act, that said “Company should be liable in its corporate capacity, in all “the capital stock, moneys and effects, for all the debt cr “debts at any time owing by said Company, and should “the effects of said Company be insufficient to satisfy all “demands against the same, then the individual stock- “holders of said Company should be held individually “liable for all unsatisfied claims against the Company, in “proportion to the amount of stock held or owned by “them respectively, and by the sixth section of the Act “it was provided that any future legislation might modify, “alter or repeal said Act—all which will more fully appear “by reference to said Act of incorporation. “ They further say that on the 16th day of June, 1841, “the City of Cincinnati, by Ordinance passed by City “ Council of Cincinnati, of that date, entered into a contract “with James I’. Conover, in which ordinance and contract “it was ordained that said Conover, his associates, their “heirs and assigns should be, and they were thereby vested “with the ful and exclusive privilege of using the streets, “Janes, commons and alleys of said city of Cincinnati, in “the State of Ohio, for the purpose of conveying gas to “said city and citizens thereof, for the term of twenty-fivé “years from the date thereof, and thereafter until the same “should be purchased by the City Council of Cincinnati, ‘“‘as therein provided for, and should have full and exclusive “power and authority to open and use the streets, lanes, “commons and alleys, for the introduction of pipe and “other apparatus for gas; and in consideration of the “privilege thereby granted to said Conover, his associates, va 41 “their heirs and assigns, he and they should furnish to “the said city, on the several streets, lanes, commons and “alleys, in which the leading or main pipes for supplying “the citizens with gas light should be laid and in use, such “quantity of gasas might be required by the City Council “for pub:ic lamps, at two-thirds of the lowest average price “at which gas shouid or might be furnished to private “individuals in the cities of New Orleans, Baltimore, New “York, Louisvilleand Pittsburg, the lamp-posts, connecting ‘pipes, metres and lamps being furnished by and at the “expense of the said city. “Tt was further provided in and by said Ordinance and “contract, that the privileges thereby granted should not “be forfeited by any temporary failure on the part of said “ Conover and his associates, their heirs and assigns, to “perform any of the conditions from them exacted, (except “as to the commencement of said works) when such “failures are occasioned by accident, untoward events, or “the want of necessary repairs in the machinery or appa- “ratus of said gas works. It was further provided that ‘any time after the expiration of the said twenty-five “vears, the said City Council should have the 1ight and “privilege of purchasing from said Conover, his associates, “their heirs and assigns, or successors, their pipes, build- “ings, fixtures and other apparatus, owned and used by “them, in and about providing the city and citizens with “oas, at a fair price and compensation, which price was to “be ascertained and determined by five disinterested per- “sons, two of whom should be selected by the City Council, “and two by said Conover, his associates, their heirs and “assigns, or successors, and the fifth by the four thus “selected or chosen, the terms of which Ordinance were 42 “ aecepted by James I’. Conover, who afterward on the “dav of , asigned and transferred the one-half “of said contract, and all the rights and privileges thereof, *to James H. Caldwell. “The defendants further say, that after the Cincinnati “Gas Light and Coke Company became duly organized “under said charter, the said James F’. Conover and James “Tf. Caldwell, for valuable consideration, on the day of , assigned and transferred the said contract, “and all the privileges of lighting the said City of Cin- “¢innati, and using the streets thereof for the purpose “mentioned in said contract, to the Cincinnati Gas Light “and Coke Company, so incorporated as aforesaid, and “which assignment was afterward made known to the City “Council of the City of Cincinnati, on the 14th day of “ September, 1842, 0n which day the said City Council “passed a resolution, which, after reciting said assignment, “ resolved that the City Council thereby recognize the said “ Cincinnati Gas Light and Coke Company as the assignee *‘ of all the rights and privileges granted to the said James “]* Conover and his assigns, upon the terms and conditions “which are specified in the said Ordinance of 16th of “ June, 1841. “ And the defendants insist, by virtue of said ordinance “so made, and of the acceptance thereof by said James F “ Conover, and by virtue of the assignments so made as “aforesaid, the defendants became invested with the ‘exclusive privilege of lighting the City of Cincinnati with “oas, and of furnishing the city and citizens of Cincinnati “with gas for the period of twenty-five years, upon the “terms mentioned and set forth in said Crdinance, and “which contract they claim can not be altered, modified, —-— 48 “or in any way changed, by any legis'ation of the State “of Ohio, or by any ordinance of the City Council of the “ City of Cincinnati, and defendants deny that the city of “ Cincinnati has ever been charged a larger price for gas “consumed by said city on the several streets, lanes, “commons and alleys of said city, than two-thirds of the “lowest average price at which gas has been furnished to “ private individuals in the cities of New Orleans, Baltimore, “New York, Louisville and Pittsburg. “And the defendants deny that the Legis'ature or “General Assembly of the State of Ohio has ever pass: d “any lawaltering or modifying the said Act, entitled ‘An «Act to incorporate the Circinrati Gas Light and Coke “Company,” all which the defendants are ready to verify “and plead in the bar of the plaintilf’s proceedings.” And afterwards, to-wit: Gn the &th day of May, 1 59, the said State of Ohio filed its demurrer to the said first plea of the said Cincinnati Gas Light and Coke Company, averring that the same, and the matter and things therein set forth, were not sufficient in law to bar or preclude the State of Ohio from having and maintaining ils said action against the said Cincinnati Gas Light and Coke Company, and by reason of the insufficiency of said plea in that behalf the State of Ohio prayed judgment, ete. That afterw rds, to-wit: On the 11th day of May, in the April Term of said District Court, 1859, the following judgment was entered in said cause, to-wit : “This cause c.me on to be heard on the plea filed by “the defendant and the demurrer of the plaintiff there‘o, “and was argued by counsel, and the Court having duly “considered the same, find the said first plea filed, is “valid in law, and that the facts in said plea set forth 44 “area bar to the relief sought by the plaintiff in the “information in the cause. It 1s, therefore, ordained and “adjudged that the demurrer filed by said plaintiff be “overruled; and the plaintiff not desiring to proceed “further in the case, it is further ordered and adjudged “that the plaintiff’s information be dismissed, and that “the defendant go hence without day.” All of which will more fully appear by the record of said case, now remaining in the said District Court. — And the said Cincinnati Gas Light and Coke Company further say that said judgment of said District Court is in full force and unreversed ; and this it is ready to verify. Wherefore, the said Cincinnati Gas Light and Coke Company prays judgment, if the said State ought to be admitted or received against the said record, to plead the replication by it thirdly above pleaded. EK. A. FERGUSON. Hoapiey, Jackson & JouNson, Attorneys for Defendant. IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO. December Term, 1867. Quo Warranto. THE STATE OF OHIO D CMUTTET US. THE CINCINNATI GAS LIGHT( pp... to . AND COKE COMPANY. ejoinders. And the said Wiliiam H. West, Attorney General of the State of Ohio, who, for the said State, prosecutes in this behalf, as to the said rejoinders of said defendant, the Cincinnati Gas Light and Coke Company to the third replication of the said State, saith that the same are not, nor is either of them, sufficient in law to bar or preclude the said State from having and maintaining the aforesaid information against the said defendant; and this he is ready to verify: wherefore, for want of a suffi- cient rejoinder in this behalf, he prays judgment, and that the said Cincinnati Gas Light and Coke Company with the said liberties, privileges and franchises, &¢., may in no way intermeddle, but may be altogether excluded from the same. W. H. WEST, Attorney General. Z ad a LA vig es " ~~ ae : : a i, Pas 7. -~ A — > a f * ‘ dd i. i : . dé i 4 « eS - 2 aie: ; ra 18 ts ; es ~ # roe Th 6 ew rey + % 2) ie ’ udy Fs . ees mas ‘ oe edie tek UN eitete T ; } , d ~ ¥ Fit - “c i+ ae 7% Mtoe J ‘¥ “i eké ANE Lv ‘. ; ‘ } o 4 f ' 4 a ‘ ‘3 ‘ Oe ae eee bitve aki hgh & ~ : i oa $ "ih : , m 7 7 ¢ ~d nm aes if RE : 5 ' ‘, ve Merah ere (3.0. Cir sts & aid pooh” Tile ame aie baer alan - 4 itcea St We: Toke Yen eg vari jae Ea fate etoile ath SUPREME COURT OF OHIO. December Term, 1868. THE STATE OF OHIO, On the Relation of the Attorney General, Vs. Fifth Plea, THE CINCINNATI GAS LIGHT AND COKE COMPANY. And now come the said defendants, and by leave of the Court, for a further plea in this behalf, say, that by an Act of the General Assembly of the State of Ohio, passed on the third day of April, in the year eighteen hundred and thirty-seven, it was enacted that certain persons therein named, and their associates, were thereby created a body corporate and politic, with perpetual succession, by the name and style of “The Cincinnati Gas Light and Coke Company,” and. by that name, they and their successors were declared to be capa- ble in law of contracting and being contracted with, sue- ing and being sued, defending and being defended in all courts and places, and in all matters whatsoever, with full power to acquire, hold, occupy, and enjoy all such real and personal estate as might be necessary and proper for the construction, extension and usefulness of the works of said company, and for the management and good gov 48 ernment of the same, and to have a common seal, and the same to alter, break and renew at pleasure. And it was also in and by said act, enacted that the corporation thereby created should have full power and authority to manufacture and sell gas to be made from any ard all of the substances, or a combination thereof, from which inflammable gas is usually obtained, to be used for the purvose of lighting the City of Cincinnati, or the streets thereof, and any buildings, manufuctories, public places or houses therein contained, and to erect necessary works and apparatus, and to lay pipes for the purpose of conducting the gas in any of the streets or avenues of said city, but before digging up or removing any of the streets or alleys of said city, the said corporation was first to give notice to and obtain the consent of the City Council of said city, for that purpose. And the said Cincinnati Gas Light and Coke Company further say, that on the 16th day of June, in the year eighteen hundred and forty-one, the said City of Cincin- nati, by an Ordinance passed on that day by the City Council thereof for that purpose, made a contract with James I’. Conover, whereby it was, among other things, provided that said Conover, his associates, their heirs, as- signs and successors, should be vested with the full and exclusive privilege of using the streets, lanes, commons, and alleys of said City of Cincinnati, for the purpose of conveying gas to the said city and citizens thereof for the term of twenty-five years from the date thereof, and thereafter until the same should be purchased by the said city as therein provided: and that they should have full and exclusive power and authority to open and use the streets, lanes, commons and alleys of said city for the in- 49 troduction of pipe and other apparatus for gas; and in consideration of the privileges thereby granted, the said Conover, for himself, his associates, their heirs, assigns and successors, agreed to furnish to the said city, on the several streets, lanes, commons and alleys to which the leading or main pipes for supplying the citizens thereof with gas light should be laid and in use, such quantity of gas as might be required by the said City Council for public lamps, at two-thirds of the lowest average price at which gas should or might be furnished to private indi- viduals in the cities of New Orleans, Baltimore, New York, Louisville and Pittsburg; the lamp posts, connecting pipes, metres and lamps being furnished by, and at the expense of the said city—and for the like price to fur- nish gas for lamps at the Engine Houses, or other public buildings or bridges belonging to the said city, the said last meutioned lamps being subject to the same regula- tions as other public lamps. . And it was also in said contract, among other things, provided that said Conover, his associates, their heirs, assigns and successors, should have laid, within two years from the date thereof, six thousand feet of leading pipe for gas, and should lay annually thereafter, four thousand feet of leading pipe for gas, until the principal parts of the city should be fur- nished with pipes, and that at any time after the expiration of the said twenty-five years, the said City Council should have the right and privilege of purchasing from the said Conover, his associates, their heirs, assigns or successors, their pipes, buildings, fix- tures and other apparatus, owned and used by them in and about providing the said city and citizens thereof 50 with gas, at a fair price and compensation; and that said price and compensation should be ascei- tained and determined by five disinterested persons two of whom should be selected by the said City Council, and two by the said Conover, his associates, their heirs, assigns or successors, and the fifth by the four thus se- lected or chosen. | And the said Cincinnati Gas Light and Coke Company further say, that after the making of said contract, to- wit: on the day of , 184 , the said James IF. Conover, associated with himself one James H. Caldwell, and assigned and transferred one-half of all the rights and privileges thereof to him: That afterwards, to-wit: on the fifth day of September, 1842, the said Conover and Caldwell assigned and transferred the said contract and all the privileges of lighting the said City of Cincinnati, and using the streets thereof for the pur- poses mentioned in said contract, to the said Cincinnati Gas Light and Coke Company, so incorporated as afore- said, which assignment was afterwards, to-wit: on the fourteenth day of September, A, D., 1842, made known to the said City Council, who thereupon, to-wit: on said last mentioned day, by a resolution passed for that pur- pose, consented to the said assignment, subject to the terms and conditions in said contract specified; from which last mentioned time, the said Cincinnati Gas Light and Coke Company have, in all respects, done and performed the things which were required, by said con- tract, to be done and performed under it, by said James I’. Conover, his associates, their heirs, assigns and suc- Cessors. And the said Cincinnati Gas Light and Coke Company NM 51 further say, that on the 31st day of August, 1853, the City Council of the City of Cincinnati passed an Ordi- nance, whereby they required said company to furnish gas to the citizens or private consumers, in said city, at the rate of two dollars and twenty-five cents per one thousand cubic feet, and no more, for the amount used, and that said company thereafter, for more than eleven months continuously, refused and neglected to furnish gas to said citizens or private consumers, in said city, at said rate, and, thereupon, on the 23d day of August, 1854, said Council, for the purpose of renewing and re- affirming said grant of said exclusive right to these de- fendants, duly passed an Ordinance, whereby they re- enacted said Ordinance passed June 16, 1841, but pro- vided therein that’ the right of said city to purchase, as aforesaid, might be exercised by said city, at any time after the expiration of twenty-five years from the date of the passage of said Ordinance originally, to-wit: on June 16, 1841, and not from the date of the re-enact- ment thereof, and these defendants then and there ac- cepted said re-enacted Ordinance, and since said 23d day of August, 1854, as also before that date, and ever since said 16th day of June, 1841, have fully kept and per- formed all and singular the requiremements and condi- tions of said original and re-enacted Ordinance, have laid much more than four thousand feet of leading pipe for gas annually, so that in all they have laid more than ninety miles of such pipe, in said city, and that the principal parts of said city are furnished with pipes, have purchased real estate, built gas-holders. and, in all, at the date of the commencement of this suit by the filing of said information, had expended in money in the construc- d2 tion of Gas Works and appurtenances necessary to the performance of said contract, more than the sum of $1,930,587 ; had entered into separate written contracts with more than ten thousand five hundred and sixty- eight private consumers of gas, whereby they had bound themselves to said consumers respectively, to furnish them with supplies of gas, of the standard quality, for their several use and consumption, and had supplied the public lamps of said city with gas, during all said time, at the price of two-thirds the lowest average price at which gas was furnished, during said time, to private individuals in the cities of New Orleans, Baltimore, New York, Louisville and Pittsburg. And the defendants further aver that, on the 23d day of August, 1866, the following preamble and resolution was adopted by the City Council of the City of Cincin- nati: “Wuereas, The General Assembly of the State of Ohio passed an Act on the 6th day of April, A. D. 1866, entitled ‘An Act to authorize cities of the first- class to issue bonds for the purchase of Gas Works,’ in which it is provided ‘That no portion of said bonds shall be issued until after the question of the purchase of the Gas Works shall be submitted to a vote of the qualified electors of said city, at a special election to be held for that purpose, to be ordered by the City Council of said city, of which not less than twenty days notice shall be given in all the daily papers of said city; and further provided, that at such election the majority of said elec- . tors shall decide in favor of such purchase,” and “Whereas, We deem it expedient and proper, that instead of entering into any further contract with the Cincinnati Gas Light and Coke Company, the question of the purchase of said Works, be referred to the people 53 jor their decision at a special election, as is provided by law; therefore, be it “ Resolved, By the City Council of the City of Cin- cinnati, that the Mayor be, and he is hereby instructed to issue his proclamation calling a special election of the qualified voters of the City of Cincinnati, to be held at the usual places of voting in all the wards, on Tuesday, the 9th day of Cctober, A. D. 1866, for the purpose of voting for or against the purchase of the Cincinnati Gas Light and Coke Company’s Works, and that the City Clerk have printed a sufficient number of two sets of ballots, to be distributed at the voting place of each ward. Upon one set shall be printed : “SPECIAL ELECTION. To decide for or against the purchase of the Cincinnati Gas Light and Coke Company’s Works, FOR THE PURCHASE OF THE GAS WORKS. And upon the other set of ballots shall be printed : “SPECIAL ELECTION. To decide for or against the purchase of the Cincinnati Gas light and Coke Company’s Works, AGAINST THE PURCHASE OF THE GAS WORKS.” “ And that there shall be provided a separate ballot box at each voting place, and there shall be three judges and two clerks specially appointed to conduct the election in each ward.” And the said defendants aver that said special election was duly held as provided in said resolution on Tuesday, the 9th day of October, 1866, and that a majority of the electors of said city voted at said election “for the pur- chase of the Gas Works,” and afterwards on the 16th of 54 November, 1866, the said City Council passed the fol- lowing resolution : Resolved, That a committee of five, to include the Presi- dent of Council, be appointed to recommend to Council not less than five suitable persons to be ballotted for as appraisers, upon the part of the City, of the Cincinnati Gas Light and Coke Co.’s Works, and the two of said persons receiving the highest number and a majority of all the votes cast, by Council, at such ballotting, shall be the appraisers upon the part of the City, to meet a like number appointed upon the part of the said Company, who shall proceed to appraise the pipes, buildings, fixtures and other apparatus owned and used by said company in and about providing the citizens with gas, in accordance with section 7 of this ordinance contracting with James F. Conover and associates, to furnish the city with gas, passed June 16th, A. D.1841. And that said committee be authorized to procure a clerk, if they should deem it advisable, and proceed to other cities for the purpose of obtaining all necessary information upon the subject of the manufacture of gas, cost of construction of gas works, and everything of interest bearing upon the subject; and, also, to report to Council what legislative action, if any, is necessary in order to authorize the city to procure money for the purchase of said works. And the said defendants aver that afterwards, and after the 23d of January, i867, said committee having been appointed, and having recommended to said Council the names of five persons in their opinion suitable to be ballot- ted for as appraisers as aforesaid, said City Council selected out of said names by ballot, those of Miles Greenwood and Henry Kessler, and informed these defendants of the se- lection of said Greenwood and Kessler as such appraisers, and these defendants therefore selected Oliver G. Steele and Henry Day, as appraisers on their part, and notified ay) said City Council of said selection, and said four ap- praisers then met at said city, on the 18th day of May, 1867, and organized by selecting Henry Kessler as Chairman, and Henry Day as Secretary, and met again at said city, at divers other days and times, by adjourn: ment, for the purpose of selecting a fifth appraiser under said contract, and then proceeding with said valuation, but having as yet failed to agree in the selection of such fifth appraiser, have adjourned to meet on the call of said Kessler, chairman. Anc the said Cincinnati Gas Light and Coke Company further say that by force of the said Act of the General Assembly, and the provisions thereof, they still continue to be, and are, a body corporate and politic, in fact and in name, and are entitled to do all lawful acts, and to enjoy all the rights, privileges, franchises and immunities allowed to them or conferred on them, by said Act, or said contract, or by the law of the land, by virtue whereof the said Cincinnati Gas Light and Coke Com- pany, for all the time in said information in that behalf mentioned, and for twenty years prior to the filing of the same, have used and exercised the liberties, privileges and franchises following, to-wit: that of being a body corporate and politic in law, fact and name, by the name of The Cincinnati Gas Light and Coke Company, and by the same name, to plead and be impleaded unto, answer, and be answered unto; and also, of having and exercising an exclusive right to open and use the streets, lanes, alleys and commons of the City of Cincinnati for the in- troduction of pipes and other apparatus for gas, for the purpose of conveying gas to the said city and citizens thereof; and also that of conveying gas through pipes 56 and other apparatus laid in the streets, lanes, alleys and commons of the said City of Cincinnati, and supplying the same to the said city and citizens thereof, at the rate of two dollars and fifty cents for every thousand cubic feet thereof, to each consumer of the same, other than the said city. And as to the residue of the liberties, privileges and franchises in the said information above specified, upon the said State of Ohio, supposed to be usurped by the said Cincinnati Gas Light and Coke Company, they say they never used, nor do they now use, the residue of said liberties, privileges and franchises—without this—that the said Cincinnati Gas Light and Coke Company, the said liberties, privileges, and franchises in said informa- tion above mentioned, or any of them, have usurped or did usurp, upon the said State of Ohio, in manner and form as by the said information, is above alleged against them; all which the said defendants are ready to verify and prove, as the Court shall award. Wherefore, they pray judgment, and that the said liberties, privileges, and franchises may be allowed and adjudged to them. E. A. FERGUSON, HOADLY, JACKSON & JOHNSON, Attorneys for Defendants. SUPREME COURT OF OHIO. December Term, 1868. THE STATE OF OHIO, On the Relation of the Attorney General, THE CINCINNATI GAS LIGHT AND VS. Fifth Rejoinder, COKE COMPANY. And the said Cincinnati Gas Light and Coke Company, by leave of the Court, for a further rejoinder in this behalf say, that the said State of Ohio ought not to be admitted or received to plead the said replication, by it thirdly above pleaded, because they say that the said Attorney General, acting herein as relator, filed the information aforesaid upon complaint caused to be made to him by the City Council of the City of Cincinnati, and not be- cause of anything coming to his knowledge otherwise, and further that heretofore, to-wit: On the 24th day of September, 1888, T. A. O’Connor, Esquire, then being the Prosecuting Attorney of Hamil- ton County, in said State of Ohio, upon the relation of Samuel M. Hart, Esquire, who was then the City Solicitor of the City of Cincinnati, and acted therein by direction of the City Council of said City, upon leave granted in the vacation of the District Court of the State of Ohio 58 in and for the Fifth Circuit thereof, being the said County of Hamilton, by the Honorable A. G. W. Carter, one of the Judges of said Court, filed an information in the nature of guo warranto in the said District Court, whereby the said Prosecuting Attorney for the said State of Ohio, gave the Court then to understand and be informed, that the said Cincinnati Gas Light and Coke Company was a corporation, having its principal place of business in the city of Cincinnati, County of Hamilton aforesaid, created by and under the laws of the State of Ohio, organized pursuant to an Act of the Legislature, entitled “An Act | to incorporate the Cincinnati Gas Light and Coke Com- pany,” passed April 3, 1837, and the acts amending the same. ‘That by the terms and provisions of said Act of incorporation, the said Cincinnati Gas Light and Coke Company was empowered and authorized to manufacture and sell gas, to be made from any or all of the sub- stances, or a combination thereof, from which inflammable gas is usually obtained, and to be used for the purpose of lighting the city of Cincinnati, or the streets thereof, and any buildings, manufactories, public places, or houses therein contained, and to erect necessary works and appa- ratus, and to lay pipes for the purpose of conducting the gas in any of the streets or avenues of the said city. That it was further enacted by Section 6 of said Act, that any future legislation might alter, modify or repeal said Act. That by the terms of an Act of the Legislature, entitled “An Act to amend an Act to provide for the organization of cities and incorporated villages,” passed March 11, 1853, the said Act of incorporation was so ert =. eee a 59 altered and modified that the City Council of said city of Cincinnati, was authorized and empowered to regulate by ordinance of said City Council, from time to time, the price which said Cincinnati Gas Light and Coke Company should charge for any gas furnished by said Company to the citizens, public buildings, lanes, streets or alleys in said city of Cincinnati. And that it was further enacted by the terms of the provisions of said Act, that the said Company should in no event charge more for any gas furnished to said city, or to individuals than the price specified by ordinance of the City Council. And that it was further provided by said Act that a neglect to furnish gas to the citizens or other consumers of gas, or to the said city of Cincinnati, by said Company, in conformity to the provisions of said Act, and in accordance with the prices fixed and established by Ordinance of said City Council, from time to time, shall forfeit all rights of said Company under the charter by which it had been established. That in pursuance of the said authority so conferred, the said City Council of Cincinnati, on August 31, 1853, duly passed an Ordinance, entitled, “An Ordinance regulating the price which the Cincinnati Gas Light and Coke Company should charge for gas furnished by said Company to the citizens, or for public buildings, streets, lanes, alleys, public landings and commons in the city of Cincinnati,” whereby it was ordained by said City Council of the city of Cincinnati, that from and after the first day of September, in the year 1858, the price which the Cin- cinnati Gas Light and Coke Company should charge for gas furnished by said Company to the citizens or private 60 consumers, or for public buildings, Council Chamber, offices, court-rooms, station or engine-houses, including buildings owned by the County of Hamilton, should be two dollars aud twenty-five cents for each thousand cubic feet and no more. That the said defendant, the Cincinnati Gas Light and Coke Company, had wholly disregarded the requirements and obligations imposed upon it by siid ordinance of the City Council, and had failed, neglected and refused, at the county aforesaid, to furnish gas to the citizens and other consumers of gas, in said city of Cincinnati, at the rate per thousand cubic feet as fixed and established by said City Council aforesaid, and the said defendant had wrongfully and persistently exacted from the said citizens and other consumers of gas, at least two dollars and fifty cents for each and every thousand cubic feet of gas con- sumed by said citizens and other consumers of gas; and the said Cincinnati Gas Light and Coke Company had thereby worked a forfeiture of its corporate rights, privi- leges and franchises. Wherefore judgment was demanded that the defendant, the Cincinnati Gas Light and Coke Company be excluded from all corporate rights, privileges and franchises, and that said corporation be dissolved. That afterward, to-wit: On the 29th day of October, A.D. 1858, the said Cincinnati Gas Light and Coke Company filed in said District Court their several pleas to said information, the first of which was as follows: “And now the defendants, the Cincinnati Gas Light “and Coke Company, come by their attorney, and having “heard the said information read, they say they ought 61 “not to be troubled by the said State of Ohio, by reason “of the premises in said information specified, because, “protesting that the said information and the matters “therein contained, are not sufficient in law, to which “said Cincinnati Gas Light and Coke Company are not “bound to answer unto by the law of the land, yet for plea “in this behalf, say that the Legislature of the State of “QOhio, by a certain Act passed on the third day of April, “in the year 1837, entitied ‘An Act to incorporate the “Cincinnati Gas Light and Coke Company,’ did enact “that the persons therein named, and their associates and “successors, should be created a body, corporate and “politic, with perpetual succession, by the name of the “Cincinnati Gas Light and Coke Company, and by that “name should be capable of contracting and being con- “tracted with, sueing and being sued, and have full power ‘to acquire, hold, occupy and enjoy all such real and “personal estate as might be necessary and proper for “the construction, extension and usefulness of the works “of said Company. “That said Company should have full power and “ authority to manufacture and sell gas, to be used for “the purpose of lighting the City of Cincinnati, or the “ streets thereof, and any buildings, manufactories, public “ places, or houses therein contained, and to erect neces- “sary works and apparatus, and to lay pipes for the “ purpose of conducting the gas, in any of the streets or “ avenues of the said city. “ Tt was also provided in and by said Act, that said “ Company should be liable in its corporate capacity, in “ all the capital stock, moneys and effects, for all the 62 “ debt or debts at any time owing by said Company, and “ should the effects of said Company be insufficient to “ satisfy all demands against the same, then the indivi- “ dual stockholders of said Company should be held “ individually liable for all unsatisfied claims against the “ Company, in proportion to the amount of stock held or “ owned by them respectively, and by the sixth section of “ the Act it was provided that any future legislation might “ modify, alter or repeal said Act—all which will more “ fully appear by reference to said Act of incorporation. “They further say that on the 16th day of June, 1541, “ the City of Cincinnati, by Ordinance passed by the City “ Council of Cincinnati, of that date, entered into a con- “ tract with James F Conover, in which ordinance and ‘ contract if was ordained that said Conover, his asso- “ ciates, their heirs and assigns should be, and they were “ thereby vested with the full and exclusive privilege of “using the streets, lanes, commons and alleys of said “ city of Cincinnati, in the State of Ohio, for the purpose “ of conveying gas to said city and citizens thereof, for “ the term of twenty-five years from the date thereof, and “ thereafter until the same should be purchased by the “ City Council of Cincinnati, as therein provided for, and “ should have full and exclusive power and authority to “ open and use the strets, lanes, commons and alleys, for “ the introduction of pipe and other apparatus for gas: “ and in consideration of the privilege thereby granted to “ said Conover, his associates, their heirs and assigns, he “ and they should furnish to the said city, on the several “ streets, lanes, commons and alleys, in which the leading “ or main pipes for supplying the citizens with gas light 63 “ should be laid and in use, such quantity of gas as might “be required by the City Council for public lamps, at “ two-thirds of the lowest average price at which gas “ should or might be furnished to private individuals in “the cities of New Orleans, Baltimore, New York, Louis- “ville and Pittsburg, the lamp-posts. connecting pipes, “ metres and lamps being furnished by and at the expense “ of the said city. “ Tt was further provided in and by said Ordinance and “ contract, that the privileges thereby granted should not “ be forfeited by any temporary failure on the part of said “Conover and his associates, their heirs and assigns, to “perform any of the conditions from them exacted, (except “as to the commencement of said works) when such “ failures are occasioned by accident, untoward events, or “ the want of necessary repairs in the machinery or appa- “yatus of said gas works. It was further provided that “atany time after the expiration of the said twenty-five “vears, the said City Council should have the right and “nrivilege of purchasing from said Conover, his asso- “ ciates, their heirsand assigns, or successors, their pipes, “buildings, fixtures.and other apparatus, owned and used “by them, in and about providing the city and citizens “with gas, at.a fair price and compensation, which price “was to be ascertained and: determined. by five disinter- “ested persons, two of whom. should be selected. by: the “ City Council, and two by. said Conover, his associates, “their heirs and: assigas, or. successors, and the fifth by “the four thus selected. or chosen, the terms of. which “Ordinance were accepted by, James. F. Conover, who “afterward on: the day, of , assigned and 64 “transferred the one-half of said contract, and all the “riohts and privileges thereof, to James H. Caldwell. “The defendants further say, that after the Cincin- “nati Gas Light and Coke Company became duly or- “oanized under said charter, the said James I. Conover “and James H. Caldwell, for valuable consideration, on “the day of , assigned and transferred the “said contract, and all the privileges of lighting the said “City of Cincianati, and using the streets thereof for “the purpose mentioned in said contract, to the Cincin- “nati Gas Light and Coke Company, so incorporated as “aforesaid, and which assignment was afterward made “known to the City Council of the City of Cincinnati, “on the 14th day of September, 1842, on which day the “said City Council passed a resolution, which, after reci- “ting said assignment, resolved that the City Council “thereby recognize the said Cincinnati Gas Light and “Coke Company as the assignee of all the rights and “privileges granted to the said James I. Conover and “his assigns, upon the terms and conditions which are “specified m the said Ordinance of 16th of June, 1841. “And the defendants insist, by virtue of said Ordi- “nance so made, and of the acceptance thereof by said “ James I’. Conover, and by virtue of the assignmenis so “made as aforesaid, the defendants became invested with “the exclusive privilege of lighting the City of Cincin- “nati with gas, and of furnishing the city and citizens of “Cincinnati with gas for the period of twenty-five years, “upon the terms mentioned and set forth in said Ordi- “nance, and which contract they claim can nct be altered, “ modified, or in any way changed, by any legislation of 65 “the State of Ohio, or by any Ordinance of the City “Council of the City of Cincinnati, and defendants deny “that the City of Cincinnati has ever been charged a “larger price for gas consumed by said city on the seve- “ral streets, lanes, commons and alleys of said city, than “two thirds of the lowest average price at which gas has “been furnished to private individuals in the cities of “New Orleans, Baltimore, New York, Louisville and “ Pittsburg. “And the defendants deny that the Legislature or “ General Assembly of the State of Ohio, has ever passed “any law altering or modifying the said Act entitled ‘An “ Act to incorporate the Cincinnati Gas Light and Coke “Company. All which the defendants are ready to “ verify, and plead in bar of the plaintiff’s proceedings.” “And afterwards, to-wit: on the 5th day of May, “ 1859, the said State of Ohio filed its demurrer to the “said first plea of the said Cincinnati Gas Light and - ‘““ Coke Company, averring that the same, and the mat- “ ters and things therein set forth, were not sufficient in “¢ law to bar or preclude the State of Ohio from having and “ maintaining its said-action against the said Cincinnati “Gas Light and Coke Company, and by reason of the “ insufficiency of said plea in that behalf, the said State “of Ohio prayed judgment, ete. That afterwards, to-wit: on the llth day of May, in the April term of said District Court, 1859, the following judgment was entered in said cause, to-wit : “This cause came on to be heard on the plea filed by “ the defendant and the demurrer of the plaintiff thereto, “ and was argued by counsel, and the Court having duls 66 “ considered the same, find the said first plea filed, is “ valid in law, and that the facts in said plea set forth, “are a bar to the relief sought by the plaintiff in the in- “ formation in the cause. It is, therefore, ordered and “ adjudged that the demurrer filed by said plaintiff, be “ overruled; and the plaintiff not desiring to proceed “ further in the case, if is further ordered and adjudged “ that the plaintiff's information be dismissed, and that “ the defendant go hence without day.” All of which will more fully appear by the record: of said case now remaining in the said District Court. And the said Cincinnati Gas Light and Coke Company. further say, that said judgment of said District Court is in full force and unreversed. And further they say, that at the time of the rendi- tion of said judgment of said District Court, the capital stock of the defendants amounted to the sum of $766,- 840 only, and that these defendants had then invested in the purchase of real estate, the laying of gas pipe, the building of gas-holders, and other permanent improve- ments and fixtures necessary for the prosecution of their business, and the lighting of said city, and the perform- ance of said contract, the sum of $834,708 only, and that since the date aforesaid, upon the faith, credit and confidence reposed in said judgment, and by it created, these defendants have purchased other. real estate, have laid, in said city, annually, much more than four thou- sand feet of leading pipe for gas, have kept and fully per- formed said contract on their part, and have supplied the public lamps of said city with gas, at the price fixed by said contract, of two-thirds the lowest average price at which gas was furnished, during the time aforesaid, to mar 67 private individuals in the cities of New Orleans, Baltimore, New York, Louisville and Pittsburg; have built new gas- holders and enlarged their works, and before the said 16th day of August, 1867, had entered into separate written contracts with ten thousand five hundred and sixty-eight private consumers of gas, whereby they were, and ever since have been, and still are, bound and _ held to said consumers and each of them, to furnish them respectively with supplies of gas of the standard quality, for their several use and consumption, and in so doing they have been obliged to expend and have expended, in permanent improvements necessary to the performance of said contract with said city, and the prosecution of their business, and without which the same could not have been performed and prosecuted, the further and ad- ditional sum of $1,095,879, and have increased their capital stock, in accordance with law, to the total sum of $1,844,900, and their property is in all of a great value, to-wit: of not less than millions of dollars, all which, except the amount so, as aforesaid, invested at the date of said judgment, has been acquired and so in- vested in reliance upon said judgment, and used in the performance of said contracts with said city and said private consumers, and the supplying of said city and its citizens with gas. And this they are ready to verify. Wherefore, the said Cincinnati Gas Light and Coke Com- pany prays judgment, if the said State ought to be ad- mitted or received against the said record, to plead the replication by it thirdly above pleaded. K. A. FERGUSON. Hoapty, Jackson & JOHNSON, Attorneys for Defendant. ay eS g. ' ).. ; 4 : cf mI ; a t ° i é ’ 2 tae a ae ‘ tte 7 ae <3 as . * - a a a « ~~ een x i a “4 = . ee *~ * “a i vit} *< Ped Pa ae ae we UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS—URBANA N36112065933522q