LIBRARY OF THE UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS National Education Association €, , .. -- >'1 .- ' \ I i/ Report of Committee of Seventeen on the Professional Preparation of High- School Teachers Advance print from Los Angeles Volume / Of B®***”" yuly^ igoj \ 1 ne person cnargmg this material is rc sponsible for its return to the library fror which It was withdrawn on or before th Latest Date stamped below. Theft, mutilation, and underlining of books are reasons for disciplinary action and may result in dismissal from the University. UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS LIBRARY AT URBANA-CHAMPAIGI '79 /iAR 23 APR 2 5 1373 L161 library Of" LHE "DIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS REPORT of the Committee of Seventeen on the Professional Preparation of High School Teachers to the Department of Secondary Education of the National / Education Association AT THE MEETING AT LOS ANGELES JULY, 1907 Advance Print from the Volume of Proceedings Los Angeles Meeting v Composed and Printed By The University of Chicago Press Chicago, Illinois, U. S. A. I 7 CONTENTS PAGE Introduction. Reuben Post Halleck, Principal Boys’ High School, LouisHUe, Ky. . . 523 Joint REcoiiMENDATiONs of the Coadhttee of Seventeen on the Profes¬ sional Preparation of High-School Teachers .536 A Short Course of Professional Reading for High-School Teachers . 539 Indrtdual Papers on the Professional Preparation of High-School Teachers - . U. M. Barrett, principal of high school, Pueblo, Colo.541 I Stratton D. Brooks, superintendent of schools, Boston, Mass.547 J. Stanley Brown, superintendent of JoHet, lU., Tovniship High School 551 Elivood P. Cuhherley, associate professor of education, Leland Stanford Jr. University.555 Charles De Garmo, professor of the science and art of education, Cornell University.558 Paul H. Hanus, professor of education. Harvard University . . . - 5^3 E. O. Holland, junior professor of education and high-school visitor. University of Indiana.577 C. H. Judd, professor of psychology, Yale University.582 George W. A. Luckey, professor of education. University of Nebraska . . 587 George H. Martin, secretary of ^Massachusetts State Board of Education . 592 M. V. O’’Shea, professor of the science and art of education. University of Wisconsin.597 Special Papers Frederick E. Bolton, professor of education. State University of Iowa I. Requirements for High-School Certification. II. The University and the College as Training-Schools for High-School Teachers. HI. Standards in Germany. IV. Standards Suggested for American Schools .... 600 Edward F. Buchner, professor of philosophy and education. University of Alabama. The Professional Preparation of Secondar}' Teachers in the Fifteen Southern States.618 John W. Cook, president Northern Illinois State Normal School Capacity and Limitations of the Normal School in the Professional Prepa¬ ration of High-School Teachers.628 Charles De Garmo, professor of the science and art of education, Cornell University. Professional Training of Teachers for the Secondary Schools of Germany 638 Edwin G. Dexter, professor of education. State University of Illinois The Present Training of Teachers for Secondary' Schools .... 644 John R. Kirk, president of Missouri State Normal School Will the Same Training in the Normal School Serve to Prepare the Teacher for Both Elementary and High-School Work ? .661 I 00 I 847 ^ Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2018 with funding from University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign Alternates https://archive.org/details/reporttodepartme00nati_0 J f 1 ; DEPARTMENT OE SECONDARY EDUCATION REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE OF SEVENTEEN ON THE PROFESSIONAL PREPARATION OF HIGH-SCHOOL TEACHERS INTRODUCTION BY THE CHAHIMAN, REUBEN POST HALLECK The Secondary Department of Education at the 1905 meeting at Asbury Park, N. J., voted that a committee be appointed by the president elected in 1905, Dr. E. W. Lyttle, New York state inspector of high schools, to consider the subject of securing proper professional preparation for high-school teachers. In accordance with this resolution, the following Committee of Seventeen was appointed. Reuben Post Halleck, chairman, principal. Boys’ High School, Louis¬ ville, Ky. H. M. Barrett, principal of high school, Pueblo, Colo. Erederick E. Bolton, professor of education. State University of Iowa. Stratton D. Brooks, superintendent of schools, Boston, Mass. J. Stanley Brown, superintendent of Joliet, Ill., Township High School, Edward E. Buchner, professor of philosophy and education. University of Alabama. ' John W. Cook, president, Northern Illinois State Normal School. E. P. CuBBERLY, professor of education, Leland Stanford Jr. University. Charles DeGarmo, professor of science and art of education, Cornell University. Edwin G. Dexter, professor of education. University of Illinois. Paul H. Hanus, professor of education. Harvard University. E. O. Holland, junior professor of education and high-school visitor, University of Indiana. C. H. Judd, professor of psychology, Yale University. John R. Kirk, president, Missouri State Normal School. George W. A. Luckey, professor of Education, University of Nebraska. George H. Martin, secretary, Massachusetts State Board of Education. M. V. O’Shea, professor of science and art of education. University of Wisconsin. As chairman, I asked every member of this Committee of Seventeen to 523 524 NATIONAL EDUCATION ASSOCIATION [Secondary prepare a paper dealing with some phase of this subject. Every one complied with this request. I am glad that the National Education Association will publish these papers in a separate pamphlet to be known as the “Report of the Committee of Seventeen on the Professional Preparation of High-School Teachers.” Because this subject is somew’hat new, it was thought wise to have a large committee from all parts of the United States, representing high schools, normal schools, colleges, post-graduate departments of education, and super¬ intendents. The majority of this committee have at some time been high- school teachers. Seven of the college professors on it werq selected because they had actually taught in secondary schools and thus had first-hand experi¬ ence with the practical necessities of the case. These men also have the added advantage of connection with university schools of education. They have for some time been considering what is ideal as well as what is practicable in the training of secondary teachers. Several other members of the committee, in addition to the two now connected with normal schools, were formerly normal- school teachers. Some critics may object because the members of this committee do not agree on all points, but let such remember that exact agreement in regard to the professional training of high-school teachers is not necessary for progress, in fact, exact agreement would soon stop advancement. Precise delimita¬ tions of method will probably be sought by the pedant, the inefficient, and those who lack originality, but it is to be hoped that the day is far distant when cut-and-dried methods of the same type shall be imposed on the secondary teachers of this land. There may be—and there probably should be— agreement on certain cardinal points, but let it not be forgotten that one of the reasons why progress in the United States has astonished the world is because there has been freer play for individuality here than elsewhere. Some repetition will naturally be found among so many papers, but even when the same point is discussed, the angle of view is frequently different. Some divergence of opinion and variation in the emphasis placed on certain subjects might have been expected from so many different types of educators. Naturally those expressions of opinion in regard to which all the members of this committee agree will carry the most weight. In order that readers might gain more definite impressions, it seemed wise to select and bring together certain cardinal points on which there is substantial agreement. To decide on these, the following members met in deliberative session at Chicago on February 28 and March i, 1907: Messrs. Bolton, Brooks, Brown, Buchner, Cook, DeGarmo, Dexter, Judd, Kirk, Luckey, O’Shea, and the chairman. After much discussion, a brief document was prepared, to be knovm as the “ Recommendations of the Committee of Seventeen on the Professional Prepa¬ ration of High-School Teachers,” and to be signed by all the members of the committee. These recommendations, which follow this paper, are the result of a conference which respected whatever conflicting views the members held Department] REPORT OF COMMITTEE OF SEVENTEEN 525 and which incorporated only those opinions in which all who were present could concur. While these recommendations leave out some things which several would have liked to see inserted, it is, nevertheless, felt that they represent a distinct advance over existing conditions. It was further agreed that additional opinions and matters on which the members of the committee could not agree would receive sufficient prominence in the individual papers following these recommendations. Every member who was at the Chicago conference agreed to these recommendations without dissent. Three of the members who were absent dissented on certain minor points, noted in connec¬ tion with their names. The chairman in this individual report wishes to emphasize what seems to him to be salient points. He is willing to concede that his views are influenced by his personal equation as an active high-school principal. There was an Elizabethan stage, which could present Shakspere’s plays, because, more than a century previous, certain towns had rules like this to determine who should act in the miracle plays:— All such as they shall find sufficient in person and cunning, to the honor of the City and worship of the said Crafts, for to admit and able; and all other insufficient persons, either in voice or person, to discharge, ammove, and avoide. The twentieth century must find some means “to discharge, ammove, and' avoide” all persons who would make “insufficient” teachers, or the profession of high-school teaching will never rise to Elizabethan greatness. Possibly schools of education might do some of their best work in acting as a sieve. Every year there are many persons desirous of getting positions in high schools whom all the professional schools of education in this country could not fashion into successful teachers. The great schools of art get rid of many would-be artists. Professors of education, while not infallible, can often tell that certain personalities could not succeed in the high school. It would be a great act of kindness to many to weed out such. There would be joy among untold adolescents, if schools of education would act as a sort of St. Peter to bar the gate against- all the manifestly unfit who think they have a “call” or who pro¬ posed to break in uncalled. I .* No matter what branch the high-school instructor is to teach, he ought to know the groundwork of psychology and its educational applications. Prob¬ ably three-quarters of the psychology taught in many universities would be about as directly serviceable to a teacher as a fifth wheel to a coach. Human minds, nevertheless, do not work in a lawless way. It is Just as necessary for efficient trainers of the mind to know its laws as for an electrical engineer to be familiar with the laws which electricity obeys, before he attempts to instal a plant. The civil engineer who deals with certain materials spends a long time studying their resistance. He does not build his bridge first and then ascertain the qualities of his materials. He learns all that he can before * The numerals tliruout all the papers mark those paragraphs referred to specifically in~the “ Joint Recommendations. ” 526 NATIONAL EDUCATION ASSOCIATION [Secondary he starts his bridge. In the same way, the high-school teacher ought to learn certain things thoroly about psychology before he even begins to teach. This is the most important single study in the professional'training of the high- school teacher. As an Irishman might say, it is not so much psychology that the teacher wants, as it is educational psychology. This is something of a blanket term, but it includes any deductions or suggestions, helpful to the teacher, which can be drawn from the main stream of psychology or from any of its branches or subdivisions, no matter whether genetic, experimentab adolescent, physiological, animal, or morbid psychology. Some eminent psychologists are not very apt at showing the applications of their subject in practical education. It is scarcely more than a quarter of a century ago that an authority in electricity in one of our great universities said that the electrical current could never be so subdivided as to make it practical for lighting small rooms. Like some psychologists, he was too busy investi¬ gating and theorizing to stop to make practical applications of his knowledge. When such an application is made, it usually is, like all truths of greatest wwth so self-evident as to render a formal statement of the process almost offensive to the theorizer. Since there has been some skepticism recently shown in certain quarters about the utility of psychology in this connection, it may perhaps not be unwise here to point out a few ways in which psychology may be made serviceable to the secondary teacher. In the first place, the gateway to teaching pupils is'by means of a nervous mechanism. Teachers ought to have a clear working knowledge of this mechanism; of its sensory and motor neurones, and their development, its associative tracts, the division of labor in the brain, the laws of neural fatigue, recuperation, and nutrition. They ought to realize that knowledge of all kinds, at the last analysis, rests upon a definite neural dispo¬ sition, that Shakspere’s daffodils \YPuld mean nothing if there had been no previous modification of nerve cells due to sensory stimuli from the flower. The fact that the nervous system grows to the mode in which it is exercised ought to be something more than an empty expression. In short, the writer feels that teachers ought to have some such working conception of physio¬ logical psychology, as he has tried to give in his Education oj the Central Nervous System A The high-school teacher will then be the better able to perform one of his important functions—that of teaching first-year pupils how to study. Book study is unnatural, and the more thinking it requires, the more unnatural it is. For untold ages, man was trained by making thought responses to sensory and motor stimuli or to the vivid imaginative recall of such stimuli. Many a boy drops out of the high school because he has never learned how to concentrate his mind on Latin or algebra. The first step in teaching him how to study by himself consists in giving him some faint dilu¬ tion of the old sensory and motor stimuli to which the brains of his progeni¬ tors were accustomed. These stimuli will be like the scaffolding employed * The MacmDlan Co., New York. Department] REPORT OF COMMITTEE OF SEVENTEEN in building a house, and they may later be dispensed with. If a boy studying his Latin forms is given a lead pencil and asked to write them out, a new stimulus is applied to two different parts of his brain. The motor tract con¬ cerned in writing is set in action and the black marks appeal visually to the occipital lobe. If he repeats the forms aloud, the speech center in the third frontal convolution and the auditory center in the temporal lobe are stimu¬ lated. Such stimuli help to anchor his attention and enable him to continue at his task. Some knowledge of physiological psychology is needed to afford intelligent guidance and to furnish philosophical explanation for insistence on certain methods. Experimental psychology has filled many pages with matter useless to the teacher, yet it has given to pedagogy a number of facts of great value. For instance, no teacher can use the time of pupils economically unless he knows the saving in interrupted repetitions in learning certain things. Experi¬ mental psychology has shown that the number of consecutive repetitions necessary for mastery in certain cases is far greater than when these repeti¬ tions are separated by a certain interval of time, and that 40 per cent, of time and energy may sometimes be saved by not insisting on absolute mastery at one attack. Further experiment has shown^that the central nervous system has peculiar laws of its own in showing progressive stages of acquired adaptation and skill. The pupil climbs the stairs rapidly for awhile with some new acquisition, then there is a long landing where he remains on a dead level, while the teacher grows discouraged and scolds and perhaps disheartens the pupil. Then there is another rapid ascent, followed by another horizontal plane. A knowledge of such laws in neural development would make more effective teachers and happier pupils. It is time that a new term was coined in educational psychology, the “ psychology of difficulty.” If teachers were grounded in this branch, they would be less often swept off their balance by “easy” methods and tasks. The psychology of difficulty tells us that what is popularly known as the “easiest” road between two places is seldom the best psychological road, that while a straight line is the shortest geometrical distance between two points, such a line is seldom the shortest psychological distance. Experi¬ mental psychology showed us long ago that consciousness, like the greatest captains of industry, whose hours are precious, saves its time and energy by erecting about itself certain barriers which interfere with any straight line access. Many stimuli from light and sound and odor are not allowed to cross the “threshold of attention.” Effective attention can be secured only by strong stimuli. The day that it ceased to protect itself against weaklings, its efficiency would cease. The most of us have to be told a thing vigorously in three different ways and then knocked down by experience before we really learn a new truth. Psychologists promptly called attention to the fact that it is not the spelling 528 NATIONAL EDUCATION ASSOCIATION [Secondary of the hardest words which is most often forgotten. “Chicago’’ and “knowl¬ edge” will be misspelled less often than “confectionery” and “separate” because the human mind will not put forth its strongest prehensile powers except when confronted with a difficulty. The Anglo-Saxon race did not develop under tropical skies with easy problems. The difficulties in the way of settling New England may even at this distance cause tender hearts to ache, but climates and subjects may be too “easy.” The Spanish language is very easily spelled and learned with comparatively small effort, and this brings us to the arithmetical problem: “If we find one Shakspere using a hard language like the English, how many should we find using the Spanish language, only one-third as hard?” High-school teachers need to learn that Anglo-Saxon adolescents do not like easy things. They prefer football to marbles, to the intense astonishment of tropical races. Many high-school teachers make themselves and their principals a vast amount of extra work in discipline and also fail to get the best results because they do not know the psychology of suggestion. It is usual to call persons fools who, after an accident with a weapon, claim that they did not know that it was loaded. Ideas, like firearms, are loaded, the ideas more often than the firearms. For a teacher, the best practical working definition of an idea is “a hint to do something.” To emphasize the importance of suggestion, teachers should learn something of hypnotism. So far as manipulating sug¬ gestive ideas is concerned, every teacher of adolescents must learn to be something of a hypnotist. People of individuality, who leave their impress on those around them are always suggestive. The psychological relation between suggestion and initiative is of the closest kind. The modern proverb, “ If you don’t see what you want, want what you see,” brings us to another point of educational psychology, important for the second¬ ary teacher. Certain teachers and salesmen are gifted at making pupils and customers want what they see. Such are worth their weight in gold. Psychology gives us the conditions of making people want what they see. We study these conditions, variously labeled as the psychology of interest or of feeling. The psychology of imagination and of thinking are also necessary in this same process, while the psychology of will conditions all else for the educator. 2. A study of apperception, or of that process under some other synony¬ mous name, ought to furnish a philosophical reason why the high-school teacher should not be merely a narrow specialist, but a person of broad cul¬ ture. We see things not as the things are, but as we are. If we are narrow we shall see great things small; we shall see only a microscopic section of the pupil’s life and interests; and we shall magnify our petty specialty out of all proportion to its relation to many-sided life. We must be broadly educated so that we can determine the educational value of the different studies and know what instruments of learning to employ in order to introduce rich¬ ness and harmony and avoid discord in the educational orchestra. The Department] REPORT OF COMMITTEE OF SEVENTEEN 529 high-school teacher, above all, needs to be responsive to all those influences which give variety to life, which quicken the imagination, which bring him into sympathetic touch with the lives of others. You cannot send the whole child to school, unless the whole teacher has gone to school. Any training which binds with dwarfish hands even the sweet influence of the Pleiades on his life will render him a less-inspiring teacher. He is dealing with those who are looking forward to a wonderful voyage of discovery to a new western world. He furnishes the incentive to that voyage; he superintends the preparation for it. In powder to make or mar, he is only a little lower than the angels. Finally, a careful study of educational psychology will help high-school teachers to form independent judgments when confronted with some new method or proposition and will further enable them to make valuable suggestions to teachers in the grades and to parents. A high-school instructor in English, for instance, finds that his pupils come to him such bad spellers as to be unable to get a good business position. When he complains, he is told by the graded teachers that scientific experiments have shown that those grades wEich have no specific instruction in spelling send out as good spellers as come from schools where spelling is a daily set task. He starts to ascertain the facts and finds that such has proved the case in a city wEere a few schools from the entire number omitted specific drill in spelling and taught it only incidentally for a few years. If he has been grounded in scientific method—and every high- school teacher should he grounded in rigorous scientific method as a part of his indispensable professional preparation —he soon notes that it is impossible for him to estimate certain factors accurately. Did the novelty of the situation in those special schools arouse every teacher to pay far more attention to the spelling of words which came up naturally, no matter in what branch or con¬ nection ? Did every teacher feel more intensely that the children of those special schools must not be allowed to fall behind in comparison with other schools ? Did the new situation make the parents feel that added responsibility was thrust upon them ? Would the state of affairs have been precisely the same if the entire city had abandoned specific spelling lessons, if there had been no rivalry, and if the novelty had completely worn away ? He soon realizes that it is impossible to answer these questions with absolute accuracy, but his educational psychology has taught him to recognize whatever advantage there is in this claim and to be on his guard against expecting results in conflict with mental law’s. While general psychology has taught him that repetition is one of the chief foundation stones of memory, educational psychol¬ ogy has indelibly impressed on him the more important fact that energy in the mental state is far more effective in securing memory than mere uninterested, somnolent repetition, and that interest is not only one of the indispensable factors of energy, but that interest is the divine mother of all w’orld-compelling energy. He has learned theoretically wEat usually happens w’hen an educa¬ tional gunner fires at a mark outside of the range of interest, and he sees spelling, as a rule, taught in a perfunctory w^ay. Even theoretical educational psychol- 53° NATIONAL EDUCATION ASSOCIATION [Secondary ogy will teach him that interest and enthusiasm are as catching as smallpox, catching even in spelling, if a live teacher, who has breathed the breath of life into his pupils, has them spell only live words. He then is thoroughly compe¬ tent to say that some may teach spelling incidentally far better than others from a specific list. His knowledge of psychology and of scientific method forbids him to make a more sweeping statement which might lead some astray. Such h’gh-school teachers have been known to change the attitude of an entire c'ty in the teaching of English, by insisting on the simple law of energy and interest—that a child should spell when there was something to spell, talk when there was someth ng to say, write when there was something to communicate, and that the teacher should be responsible for providing the interest and the occasion, just as an intelligent parent succeeded in getting two of the laziest boys in the city to clear his garden of stones, by putting in the comer a mark at which they could throw. Other teachers have little fuss and feathers with Latin or modern language forms after a few months, because these teachers know and apply the psychological truth that energy and interest are natural qualifies in a mental state when dealing w’th new matter, as well as with any¬ thing demanded by the present logical necessities of the case. Those teachers who let the golden time of novelty pass without utilizing to the utmost the men¬ tal energy then liberated are like the landsman who waited to sail his boat out of the harbor unt'l after the breeze had died away. The teacher grounded in modern educational psychology will have an advantage over the one who discovers the right method through experience alone. He will know why and when to do a certain thing and not stumble blindly on the right process. In short, increased efficiency and leadership may be expected from the high- school teacher who has made a thoughtful study of educational psychology, accompanied by training in scientific method. Professional training is strictly not concerned with the subject-matter, as mere original information, but only with that matter from the point of view of the high-school teacher, or more strictly still, from the point of view of the high-school pupil. 3. This difference between a knowledge of the subject-matter and the re¬ casting it to fit the pupil’s mind, however self-evident it must seem to every psy¬ chologist, is not yet generally appreciated by high-school teachers or their college instructors. This difference is as great as the difference between a side of leather in a wholesale store and a part of that same leather cut out by a skilful shoemaker to fit a certain person’s foot. “Knowledge is knowledge,” says the university specialist. ‘‘All that is necessary is to give the high-school teacher plenty of knowledge and his pupils will get it.” Yards of silk are yards of silk. All that is necessary is for a woman to give her dressmaker plenty of goods and a dress will be forthcoming. Why, then, will women gladly pay certain dressmakers three times as much as others to make up precisely the same dress pattern ? Such a question would seem childish to every woman who has had “trouble with her dressmaker.” This question Department] REPORT OF COMMITTEE OF SEVENTEEN 531 would seem more childish in this connection if it was not for the fact that so many university professors are today claiming that knowledge is the prime requisite, that other things will take care of themselves. 4. The first necessity for the high-school teacher is, of course, ample knowl¬ edge, If he is to teach Latin, for instance, he should be a better teacher for studying it four years in a high school and four years in college. A teacher in the academic department of a high school should not only have a degree from a reputable college, but he should also have given special study to any subject which he expects to teach. If no absolute number of years can be assigned for subjects as various as Latin, bookkeeping, and manual training, the teacher specialist should be guided by the general rule that he ought to study his branch until he can survey it as a whole, keep in mind at one time its parts, decide what may be omitted without detriment, and have confidence in his own opinion on any points raised in connection with his subject. Without such a mastery, it ought not to be possible for a high-school teacher to get a certificate. His certificate should be issued only for those special subjects in which he has adequate scholarship. 5. Every high-school teacher ought to have a definite course in recasting his subject from the pupil’s point oLview. A Ph.D. may chafe at having to learn his subject over under such restrictions, but why should he chafe any more than a plumber, who comes to your home with an ample supply of pipe and joints which do not fit, chafes at being sent back to the shop for suitable material? Why should the Ph.D. not expect to submit to the same earthly laws which every successful tailor, farmer, cook, and manufacturer must obey ? The teacher must fit the pupil’s mind. Misfit knowledge discourages the pupil, perplexes him, and frequently causes him to stop school. High-school teachers have often been heard to repeat precisely the same explanation four or five times to a wretched pupil, making no attempt to find a different route into his mind, or to lodge the fact there by slow stages, resting patiently on successive landings. This point of working over one’s store of knowledge so that it can be intelligently communicated to the pupil and assimilated by him is as important as getting that knowledge in the first place. Universities and schools of educa¬ tion ought, for a while at least, until the full importance of such a distinction is recognized, to keep sharply separate those courses which give new informa¬ tion to the student and those which teach him how to adapt to growing minds the information which he already has. 5a. There are two practical ways that may be employed in training high- school teachers to acquire their specialty a second time from the learner’s point of view. The first, which should be used in every case, is to have professors of education who can take the pupil’s point of view and become children again, just for that course. The candidate should then be required to present the subject-matter under those limitations. For successful results, professors of education must be found who are capable of taking the adol- 532 NATIONAL EDUCATION ASSOCIATION [Secondary escent’s point of view, men who are not desiccated, who have their own youth well in memory, and who subject their own methods to the touchstone of that memory. Such men will instruct the future high-school teacher to see how much he can possibly omit from every textbook, without impairing its logical sequence, and how much he needs to add to make that sequence com¬ prehensible and vivid to pupils. The teacher should realize that the author of every secondary textbook is swayed, consciously or unconsciously, by what adult critics will say of its completeness and logical methods, and that there will consequently be introduced matter beyond the comprehension of the average high-school student. The teacher must learn to note and reject this adult matter. 56. He should alsobe taught to repeat to himself with all reverence thisprayer every morning before he enters the high-school room: “Give me this day sufficient sense and sympathy to realize that what appears to me easy, logical sequence, only because I am a specialist in that branch, may seem absolutely meaningless jargon to an adolescent. Make me to feel that one taste of victory over high-school subject-matter is worth a hundred defeats, yea, that victory and hope and continuance in school are adolescent synonyms, and that a general’s fame is not built on the defeat of his troops. Teach me to be less wise in my own conceit and give me the social grace to realize that if I am to travel in the golden clime of adolescence, I must at least learn the lan¬ guage of that country and avoid what may seem to its inhabitants a barbaric tongue. Bestow on me the saving grace of humor sufficient to keep me from over-stressing any point and from becoming shrill. Grant me also the capacity to be as easily bored as the children of that rapidly changing land of spring¬ time. And, finally, enable me every day to look through the eyes of adolescence at a new world bathed in a light that never was on land or sea. Amen.” 6. The second method consists in giving candidates what our medical friends call “hospital practice” on actual adolescents. For the sake of the children, previous preparation should reduce to the least possible minimum the evils necessarily resulting from such a course. Some such practice is indispensable. This may be had (i) in a secondary school maintained by a university for that special purpose; (2) in the schools in the town or city in which the uni¬ versity is situated; (3) in distant high schools. For a careful study of what is actually being accomplished by the first two methods. Professor Dexter’s excellent paper should be read. The third method has for some time been employed in an increasing degree during the last few years by superintendents and high-school principals all over the country. These inexperienced teachers are watched, advised, and given a chance as often as possible to visit the class¬ rooms of the best teachers in the school. The majority of those who have had experience in secondary schools would probably agree that practice in teaching in the grades would not take the place of experience in the high school, and that the two schools must differ widely in methods. A study of the psychology of adolescence should make this point plain. The papers of Messrs. Barrett, Department] REPORT OF COMMITTER OF SEVENTEEN 533 Bolton, Cook, DeGarmo, Kirk, and Martin will show some divergence of opinion. 7. In this connection, however, we should note that there can be no dispute about the truth that a high-school teacher’s academic and professional training should be conditioned largely by the special subjects which he is to teach, and that practice in teaching Latin would not make a skilful teacher of physics. Pedagogical hospital practice for teachers of adolescents, in some form or other, is as old as Adam. It is yet in its infancy in systematic scientific appli¬ cation in the training of secondary teachers. The next ten years will prob¬ ably show what special secondary training-schools can and cannot accomplish. The members of this committee regret that these schools are not farther evolved at this time, and that the data based solely on practice in conducting them is at present so limited.’ 8. Every prospective high-school teacher should be encouraged to spend at least one post-graduate year in some university school of education, engaged in professional preparation for teaching. Where this is not possible, at least one-eighth of his under-graduate work should be devoted to such professional branches. This recommendation was submitted for criticism by a high- school principal to a group of twenty excellent men, all of them experienced high-school teachers. “Is this rule for men or for women?” sixteen of them asked. “For both,” was the reply. “Well, this rule would have disposed of us,” replied the sixteen, “for none of us intended to become teachers early enough to shape our college course in conformity with such requirements. If we had been compelled to take a post-graduate year, we should have done something else.” Their principal shifted uneasily in his chair, for he realized that among those sixteen men there were enough born teachers to make a reputation for almost any school. It may be true that comparatively few of the many born teachers ever enter the profession of teaching, even under the easiest require¬ ments. Careful investigation should determine whether these same easy requirements do not drive out the fit teachers, under a sort of pedagogical Gresham’s law, that a legalized cheap instrument, to be used on other people, will drive out a dearer instrument, in the same way that a debt will be paid in the cheaper money, if two standards are in circulation. It is plain that in the case of men, such a rule should not be passed, unless as some of us think, it would be a step toward making high-school teaching as much of a profession as either law or medicine and as well rewarded. Even these desiderata would not be sufficient to tempt the best men unless their tenure of office was certain, unless they could have freedom for their different individualities, and escape the apron strings of too much supervision. Many first-class women might conform to stringent requirements only because fewer ways of earning a living are open to them. It is certainly not the wish of this committee to suggest requirements which would keep the best 534 NATIONAL EDUCATION ASSOCIATION [Secondary men from becoming high-school teachers. In Germany the secondary teacher must have eighteen years of preliminary study and practice; three years in the primary school, nine in the gymnasium, three in the university, one in passing the state examinations, one in the seminary, and one in trial teaching. Even then there are generally two applicants for every place, but there is no competition on the part of women.^ The caste system in Germany is such, the population so dense, the opportunity of rising in varied ways so few, that the young men of the United States cannot be expected to be willing to follow Germany as a pattern. Every secondary-school teacher ought to have as a part of his regular professional training either a course under a library expert or under someone capable of giving instruction in recommending general reading for adolescents. The future teacher should learn the point of view of different types of adoles¬ cents and be able to suggest books interesting to them all in all branches. No teacher ought to receive a high-school certificate unless he is able to recommend stimulating and interesting books on subjects as various as astronomy, inventions, history, animals, literature, adventure, poetry, flowers, Indians, and travel. He should know better than his pedagogy books like The Prince and the Pauper, The Jungle Book, The Oregon Trail, Astronomy with an Opera Glass, Tenting on the Plains, The Bar Sinister, Lives of the Hunted, Hero Tales from American History, and suitable poetry selected from a wide range. Boys and girls have, in the majority of cases, decided before leaving their teens what the bulk of the reading for the rest of their lives shall be, in fact, whether they shall read anything except novels. Libra¬ rians say that the majority of all reading is done by young people before tw’enty. The experience of the world, its joys and sorrow, are bequeathed to us thru books. By them, Shakspere, being dead, yet speaketh. Woe to the boy or girl who leaves the high school without a taste for reading. Every decade or so sees the hours of the laborer shortened. What shall he do with his spare time ? This becomes a question of increasing importance. The saloon, the poolroom, and the card-table will have less attractions for the one whose teachers have given him a love for reading. The teacher who has not made a special study of reading for adolescents cannot do his best in implanting such a love. Unless he supplements this special training during each subse¬ quent year of his teaching-life by reading at the very least three adolescent books, he will gradually lose On a number of occasions the writer has expressed his views in considerable detail respecting various aspects of the training of the high-school teacher, and it seems appropriate at this time to treat the subject assigned him by presenting a series of theses without elaboration. If any reader should be interested in the arguments upon which these theses are based, he might glance over the following: “Teachers by the Grace of God” {Journal of Pedagogy, Vol. XIII, 1900); “Concerning High-School Teachers” {The School Revietv, Vol. X, 1902); “Psychology in the Training of Teachers” {Elementary School Teacher, November, 1904); “The Function of the University in the Training of Teachers” {The School Review, Vol. VIII, 1900); “Uni¬ versities and Normal Schools in the Training of Secondary-School Teachers” (Part I, of Fourth Yearbook of the Society for the Scientific Study of Education). 598 NATIONAL EDUCATION ASSOCIATION [Secondary adopt a plan whereby they may early discover candidates who do not meet the personal requirements, and dissuade them from striving to become teachers. The opinions of all who have had to deal with the student during his academic career should be secured, but the department of education should be specially responsible for the task indicated in this thesis. Altho the problem is a pecu¬ liarly difficult one, and cannot be solved completely under existing conditions in colleges and universities, still if the need be felt deeply more can be done than is now done in most places. But the universities must act in unison; no single institution can make great headway against the academic tradition that one can teach in a high school if only he has amassed a sufficient amount of formal knowledge in any subject. 3. Requirement oj scholarship .—One cannot teach a subject unless he has thoroly mastered it. He must have a real, vital grasp of it, and not merely a formal or verbal knowledge of it. Teachers are often found giving instruc¬ tion in subjects which they have acquired for purposes of securing a certificate and such instruction is always shallow, mechanical, ineffective. It amounts often to little more than memoriter drill on unintelligible technical terms. Teachers in secondary schools should be certificated to teach not all subjects whatsoever, but only the subject in which they have shown special proficiency. To meet the necessities of teaching in small high schools, it will often be neces¬ sary for teachers to teach more than one subject; but in such case, the cer¬ tificate should indicate the major subject (the candidate’s specialty) and the minor subjects, not to exceed two in any case. The several departments of the university should be made solely responsible for determining which of their students have acquired such a genuine mastery of their respective sub¬ jects that they may be certificated to teach them. A teacher’s mastery of a subject must include an understanding of what aspects thereof are most appropriate for secondary-school students and what point of view in presenting the subject will prove most effective. To this end every teacher should be required to complete a teacher’s course in the subject he is to teach, and this course should be conducted by one who is thoroly familiar alike with the subject, and with the nature and needs of secondary- school pupils. Mere advanced, technical courses should not be regarded as in any sense teachers’ courses, as is now the case in some universities. The teacher’s course should be regarded as graduate work, as indicated in the following thesis. 4. Requirement oj studies in education .—The experience of nations has shown that in order to achieve the highest success teachers should understand the subject as well as the material of education, and should become possessed of what is known respecting methods of economy and efficiency in organizing and managing a class or a school or an educational system. Further, the teacher is a servant of society in a very vital sense, and he should be made con¬ scious of his opportunities and duties in this respect. To meet these require¬ ments, then, every teacher should complete courses treating of the principles Department] PREPARATION OF HIGH-SCHOOL TEACHERS 599 of human nature in general, and of the nature of secondary-school pupils in particular. He should also complete a course treating of the psychology of learning under the conditions of school education. These courses should confer upon him greater efficiency in adjusting his subject as a whole and in each part to the needs and capabilities of his pupils. Next, he should complete courses treating of the history and principles of education, so that he may realize what are the aims of educational work, viewed in the light of contem¬ porary thought, and how these aims have been developed. These courses should make him conscious of the supreme ends to keep in view in his teaching, and what should be the relation of his subject to the other work of his pupils and of the school as a whole. Finally, the teacher should complete a course treating of his proper relations to the extra-school interests in the community in which he teaches. These professional studies may best be pursued as graduate work. The training of the secondary-school teacher will be seriously defective so long as he completes both his academic and his professional studies during his under¬ graduate course. The courses in education described above should occupy two-thirds of a graduate year. If the candidate spends no time in graduate study, as is the case generally at present, then these professional studies should occupy an* equivalent of one-half of his senior year. 5. Requirement of observation and practice .—It is universally recognized that effective instruction in medicine, law, engineering, agriculture, and the like requires opportunities for concrete demonstration, and for practice to a limited extent at least. Teaching is no exception in this regard. It is, how¬ ever, a fact that education, concerned as it is with the exposition of principles for effective instruction, is more seriously handicapped than any other subject in observing the principles it expounds. There is need in the first place of an educational museum, wherein may be displayed specimens of all useful educa¬ tional appliances, illustrative materials, textbooks, etc. It is imperative, in the second place, that there be in every institution training high-school teachers a fully organized and well-equipped school typifying the school system in which students wiU teach. This school should be constantly utilized to give definite¬ ness, concreteness, and vitality to instruction in every phase of educational theory and practice. So far as feasible it should be utilized also for the testing of educational theories at present in dispute. Finally, it should be utilized for the purpose of initiating the novice in the practice of his art. It will not ordinarily be possible or desirable to perfect him in technique, but his special needs can be discovered, and he can be put in the way of curing his faults by his own efforts while he is actually in service. The schools of observation and practice should be regarded as laboratories for the work in education, and in no sense as schools preparator}' to the uni¬ versity. They should be under the control of the department of education, which should be responsible for curricula and methods of teaching and dis¬ cipline. So far as possible the department of education should secure the 6oo NATIONAL EDUCATION ASSOCIATION [Secondary active co-operation of all departments of the university having in charge sub¬ jects taught in an elementary way in the schools in question. The teachers’ courses in the university should be presented with constant reference to the work done in these schools. 5(2. Wherever it is at all feasible, the university should enter into relations with the high schools in its vicinity so that candidates may have some practice under ordinary public-school conditions. The university should contribute to the salaries of a certain number of teachers in these high schools, to the end that unusually competent persons may be secured, who may serve the uni¬ versity as critics of practice teachers. These critics should be appointed by the university, upon the recommendation of the department of education, and subject to the approval of the board of education in charge of the high school. Practical work of the character indicated should occupy at least one-third of the time which the candidate devotes to professional studies, and it should be regarded as absolutely essential to the efficient training of high-school teachers. XII {special) REQUIREMENTS AND STANDARDS FREDERICK E. BOLTON, PROFESSOR OF EDUCATION, STATE UNIVERSITY OF IOWA I. Requirements for High-School Certification. II. The University and the College as Training-Schools for High-School Teachers. HI. Standards in Germany. IV. Standards Suggested for American Schools. In beginning to prepare this paper an attempt was made to secure thru a questionnaire statistics showing the specific kind of training and experience which the high-school teachers have actually had in a number of typical states. The inadequate returns received made any exhaustive statistical study impos¬ sible. In only a few states has any attempt been made to gather such data. Some state superintendents replied in such a way as to indicate their probable feeling that such information would be entirely superfluous. But not until the statistics can be arrayed so as to show the glaring lack of uniformity and how many teachers are below even moderate standards can we expect to improve conditions. School boards and legislatures must be convinced thru unequiw ocal testimony that woeful deficiencies exist often where the public boasts the most. About buildings and grounds the popular mind may have some intelligent opinions, but the ordinary school public does not discriminate between the expert teacher and the time-server. In the minds of the people, so long as friction is avoided, any teacher is considered a good teacher. Failing to secure the adequate data concerning the actual preparation of teachers in service, I have investigated the laws of all the states to find the Department] PREPARATION OF HIGH-SCHOOL TEACHERS 6 oi legal provisions concerning high-school teaching. We should bear in mind that the actual preparation made by many, even a majority, is much better than that demanded by statutes. Local demands in the better cities are naturally in- advance of legislation. Statutory provisions can seldom be secured until the wisdom of the requirements has been rather generally demon¬ strated. There is very little constructive legislation, especially school legis¬ lation. Legislative bodies in old-settled states are very conservative and merely reflect what they believe to be public opinion by confirming thru statutory provisions what is well established in practice. Since they are usually so ignorant concerning educational needs it is seldom possible to con¬ vince them of desirable legislation until long after various localities have proceeded way beyond the measures enacted. In new states where traditions do not fetter and public opinion is little crystallized much more constructive legislation is secured than in the older states. As was believed, most of the states were found to be without legislation differentiating the high-school teacher from any other. In many school codes the term high school does not appear. This branch of the public school system is a product of evolution which has come largely without legislative enactment. Localities developed at first simply “upper rooms,” “higher departments,” etc., and then bestowed the name high school without waiting permission or measurement by state authority. Thus, singularly enough, in most states, altho state certificates and diplomas are awarded to those who seek them, yet nobody is required to have them. Legally, the one possessing the lowest grade of county or town certificate may teach in the highest grade of school. Many cities have secured state authority to regulate the certification of their own teachers and usually have differen¬ tiated the certificates for the various grades of work. There is a crying need now for all states to make the differentiation. There is also great desirability of securing uniform laws in all the states so as to secure inter-state comity in matters of certification. A few pioneer states have secured desirable legislation relating to the certi¬ fication of the various grades of teachers and it might be parenthetically observed that these states are already forging ahead in educational matters in a variety of ways. I. REQUIREMENTS FOR HIGH-SCHOOL CERTIFICATION In the following paragraphs mention is made mainly of those states which have specific legislation determining the qualifications of high-school teachers. In general, where the laws simply state that all teachers must possess a legal license and do not distinguish between elementary and secondary no mention is made of the states. A few others are mentioned because it was possible to secure definite statistics concerning the teachers in service. In Arizona only those holding the diploma of the Territorial Board of Education or the Board of Education of the Normal Schools of the territory 6o2 NATIONAL EDUCATION ASSOCIATION [Secondary are eligible to teach in the high schools. Diplomas and state certificates from the other states may be recognized by the Territorial Board. Colorado demands that all who teach in the high schools of that state shall take a county examination covering all the branches taught in the high school. In the District of Columbia all high-school teachers must have a special certificate which qualifies the holder for that grade of work only. In Connecticut there are 4,316 teachers in the state of whom about 1,400 are normal-school graduates and about 400 graduates of colleges and uni¬ versities. Most of these 400 are teaching in high schools. Inasmuch as there are only 66 high schools in the state it is probably true that most of the teachers in the high schools are college or university graduates. California has set the highest pace in the United States with reference to the qualifications for high-school teachers. Under statutory provisions the State Board of Education grants all certificates for teaching in the high schools of the state. These may be obtained by examination or otherwise but ^‘no cre¬ dentials shall be prescribed or allowed unless the same, in the judgment of said board, are the equivalent of a diploma of graduation from the University of California and are satisfactory evidence that the holder thereof has taken an amount of pedagogy equivalent to the minimum amount of pedagogy pre¬ scribed by the State Board of Education of this state, and include a recom¬ mendation for a high-school certificate from the faculty of the institution in which the pedagogical work shall have been taken.” California accepts the di¬ plomas from all the universities belonging’to the Association of American Universities, and also from fifteen other selected colleges and universities thruout the United States, provided the graduates have taken courses in the theory of education, or have had actual practice in teaching un^er supervision of the pedagogical faculty, equivalent to twelve hours per week for one-half year. Graduates of all the accepted colleges not belonging to the Association of American Universities must have completed subsequent to graduation one- half year of advanced academic or professional (pedagogical) work, in resi¬ dence, either at the same institution or at some other accepted institution, or in lieu of such graduate study, have taught with decided success, as regular teacher or as principal, at least twenty months in any reputable school, elementary or secondary. After July, 1906, at least one-third of the pre¬ scribed pedagogy shall consist of actual teaching in a well-equipped training- school of secondary grade, directed by the department of education. After July 1,1908, practice teaching in a school of the grammar grade in connection with the California state normal schools will be accepted as an equivalent. In Florida, high schools cannot be recognized as such unless the teachers employed to give instruction therein are competent to teach the subjects required by the official course of study, and no school will be granted state aid unless such teachers are provided. While it is not now deemed practicable to require all such teachers to hold state certificates, it is recommended that preference always be given by boards to the holders of such certificates. Department] PREPARATION OF HIGH-SCHOOL TEACHERS 603 In Iowa, the most democratic and individualistic state in the Union, there is utter lack of uniformity. All depends upon local autonomy. The term high school does not appear in any legislative enactment, there is no defini¬ tion of the term except that which each community chooses to give to it, and the state superintendent’s ofl&ce has no authority to regulate its courses or prescribe qualifications for the teachers employed. Any one possessing a third grade county certificate may legally teach in any high school in the state. Notwithstanding this chaotic condition of educational legislation the state has many high schools which are unexcelled anywhere. The wealth of the state, the life in small cities possessing large rural population within a ra ius of a few miles of each, the uniformity of nationality, the lack of slums and factory districts give natural advantages which would easily give it with proper legislation the greatest school system of the United States. The state is suffering because of its prejudices against any form of centralization of power. There are in the state about 650 graded schools which call themselves high schools. Nearly all of these might become high schools if the proper teaching force were employed, proper equipment secured, and a little effort made to enlist the interest of the rural population in the immediate vicinity. This has been demonstrated in many small villages where they have become awake to the possibilities. As it is, not more than 250, judged by proper standards, have any right to be called high schools. There are 185 schools on the accredited list of the State University. In these there are 879 teachers, including the principals and superintendents. Of these 453 are university or college graduates, 189 have had from one to three years in some college, 84 are normal-school graduates only. The remainder have had very little academic or professional training. Regrettable as it is, one in fourteen or one teacher in every third accredited school has had no institutional training beyond that afforded by the high school, and that usually in the home school. Of the total number employed 332 had been teaching ten years or more, 265 had five or more years’ experience, while 61 were beginners. Statistics from all the schools which have any claim to the title of high school would show a much smaller number of college graduates and many more raw recruits. Louisiana definitely recognizes high schools and makes an attempt to secure the best quality of teachers for these schools. In 1892 a law was passed imposing a penalty on all local school boards who failed to give pref¬ erence to state normal-school graduates and graduates of colleges when employing teachers. In Maine, according to the laws of 1904, the highest grade of state cer¬ tificate is necessary to teach in any free high schools of the state. Candidates who are college graduates or graduates from the college preparatory course or its equivalent in a first-class academy or high school, and whose average rank is 90 and whose rank in any subject is not less than 70 will receive a certificate of the highest grade. Others who are not graduates but whose rank is excep- 6o4 NATIONAL EDUCATION ASSOCIATION [Secondary tionally high, who can teach high-school subjects, including at least one ancient and one modern language, and who have taught successfully in high school, may receive a certificate of highest grade. Massachusetts has 262 high schools requiring 1,820 teachers. Altho the laws do not specify any particular grade of certificate the sentiment of the people has secured a high grade of teachers. Of the teachers in the high schools 1,410 are college graduates. It is safe to assume that the remaining 410 are at least normal-school graduates. Only 98 have taught for less than one year. Minnesota requires that any teacher employed in a state high school must hold a first-grade professional state certificate, issued either on a collegiate diploma or upon examination. However, the state superintendent may issue a permit, valid for one year, to high-school teachers who have not had the necessary teaching experience in Minnesota to entitle them to a first-grade professional certificate but who are otherwise qualified. A first-grade state professional certificate may be obtained by graduates from the University of Minnesota or from another university or college of equal rank. The applicant must first have secured a state first-grade certificate and must also have taught with success not less than nine months in a public school in a state. Appli¬ cants who are not graduates must have the teaching experience and the first- grade certificate noted above, and, in addition, will be required to pass a successful examination in the following branches: astronomy, bookkeeping, botany, chemistry, English literature, general history, geology, history of education, logic, moral philosophy, political economy, psychology, rhetoric, school economy, school law, solid geometry, trigonometry, zoology. A state professional certificate of the first-grade is valid to teach in any public school of the state, including high schools. It is made valid for periods ranging from one year to life, according to the merit of the holder. A certificate of graduation from the department of pedagogy at the State University ent'tles the holder to teach in any public school in the state for a period of two years immediately following graduation. At the end of such period the certificate may be indorsed by the president of the State University and the state super¬ intendent of public instruction, when it becomes a life certificate. It is of interest to note that graduates of Minnesota state normal schools or other normal schools of equal rank outside of the state, are not entitled to teach in the high schools. They receive first temporary and then life certificates which are valid in any public school in the state below the high school department. The state teachers’ first-grade certificate, valid for five years to teach in any public school in the state, will not qualify the holder to teach in the high school or even for the principalship of a state graded school. These rigid regulations have raised the quality of the teaching force and the salaries of teachers in Minnesota very materially. According to figures furnished by State High-School Inspector Alton, there are 192 high schools in the state employing 870 teachers, including the super- Department] PREPARATION OF HIGH-SCHOOL TEACHERS 605 intendents. Of these 733 are graduates of a college or a university and only 56 are graduates of a normal school. It is well known that very generous state aid is provided, whereby each standard high school receives $1,500 from the state treasury. This state aid affords better salaries and attracts better teachers. The state aid and the high standard of scholarship demanded have put Minne¬ sota in the very front rank educationally. In iVIontana it is provided that no person shall be employed as a teacher in a high school or as the principal teacher in a school of more than two depart¬ ments who is not the holder of a professional county certificate or the holder of a life state diploma issued by the State Board of Education of Montana, or who is not a graduate of some reputable university, college, or normal school. New Jersey provides that all teachers in the high schools must possess either a first-grade county certificate, a first-grade city certificate, or a state certificate. The first-grade certificate requires an examination in the theory and practice of teaching, New Jersey school law, the history of education, and general history, in addition to the usual branches required for a second- grade certificate. The lowest grade of state certificate involves an examina¬ tion equivalent to that required for the first-grade county certificate and, in addition thereto, psychology, plane and solid geometry, literature, botany, and free-hand drawing, or in place of one or more of these subjects such other subjects as the State Board of Examiners may require. This lowest or third- grade state certificate is valid for seven years. In Nevada no one may teach in a high school who does not possess either .the county high-school certificate, which is good for four years, or a state cer¬ tificate granted from the Nevada State Normal School or by a reputable uni¬ versity or college from which the bachelor of arts degree has been received. Pedagogy is also required in the course. The state life diploma also is a valid license to teach in any public high school. New York will not allow teachers to hold positions in the high schools unless possessed of some specified grade of certificate. At the present time they accept for high-school teaching what are known as the training-school certificate, the state certificate, the state special certificate, the normal diploma, the college graduate certificate, and the college-graduate professional cer¬ tificate. College graduates are given a provisional certificate valid for two years. If they pass an examination upon psycholog)^, history of education, principles of education, methods of teaching, during those two years they may be awarded a permanent certificate. Those college graduates who have completed a course in pedagogy outlined by the state receive a certificate valid for three years, at the end of which the same may be indorsed by the state commissioner of education and made a life certificate. In New York 39 per cent, of the high-school teachers and 43 per cent, of Ihe principals are college graduates. Nebraska has taken a most important step toward providing competent teachers for the high schools of that state. On and after September i, 1907 6o6 NATIONAL EDUCATION ASSOCIATION [Secondary no person shall be granted a certificate to teach in the high-school department of any high-school district or in the high-school department of any city school district in the state who is not a graduate from a regular four-year course of a college or university, or a graduate from the advanced course of a college, university, or normal school in the state authorized by law to grant teachers’ certificates, or who does not hold a professional state certificate obtained from the state superintendent on examination. During the interim between now and August, 1907, high-school principals and city superintendents may obtain a first-grade county certificate, valid for three years, which will make them eligible to teach in any high-school district or city school district until September I, 1910. Ohio, which long lagged behind in the matter of educational legislation, has probably outdone all other states in several respects. One of these is in accurately defining high schools and colleges. Then, to be consistent, the qualifications of high-school teachers have also been thoroly defined. All teachers in the high schools must possess some form of a high-school certificate. This certificate may be issued either by the county or the state. All county high-school certificates must include the usual branches required for a third- grade certificate, and, in addition, literature, general history, algebra, physics, physiology, and four branches from the following list: Latin, German, rhetoric, civil government, geometry, physical geography, botany, and chem¬ istry. In addition, the certificate must show that the candidate “possesses an adequate knowledge of the theory and practice of teaching.” Special high-school certificates are issued, valid only for the branches mentioned in the certificate, but it is further provided that no person be employed as a special teacher of music, drawing, painting, penmanship, gymnastics, German, French, the commercial industrial branches, in any elementary or high school who has not a certificate of good moral character and a certificate of pro¬ ficiency in the theory and practice of teaching. Cities which have the power to grant certificates must observe similar conditions. The state certificates are, of course, of a still higher grade. Texas allows cities of five hundred or more school population to establish their own boards of examiners which issue different classes of certificates corresponding to the grade of work to be taught. The high-school certificate is a prerequisite to teaching in the high school and is valid for high-school work only. State certificates are recognized by these boards. Diplomas from the State University which certify to the requisite amount of pedagogical work are valid as state certificates. In Washington, D. C., certificates are limited to special grades of schools. The certificates are issued by the city. Only a special certificate will be accepted for high-school work. Graduation from the Washington normal schools and other approved normal schools is recognized toward certification. In Wisconsin all teachers must have some form of state certificate to be qualified to teach in the high schools of the state. The state certificates are of Department] PREPARATION OF HIGH-SCHOOL TEACHERS 607 two grades—the limited five-year certificate, and the life certificate. These certificates may be gained by examination or thru countersignature of state normal-school diplomas, college diplomas, or university diplomas. A diploma granted upon the completion of a collegiate course in the State University of Wisconsin or from the full course of any Wisconsin normal school is valid as a temporary certificate for one year and after countersignature by the state super¬ intendent is validated as a life state certificate. Diplomas granted by other colleges and normal schools, within and without the state, whose course of study are equivalent to those recognized in Wisconsin may be recognized in the same way as those issued in the state. Life state certificates issued by other states may be countersigned by the state superintendent of Wisconsin upon the recommendation of the State Board of Examiners, and thereby become life certificates in the state. The diploma granted upon the completion of the elementary course of the state normal schools qualifies the holder only for positions as assistants in four-year high schools or as principals of three-year high schools. All principals and all teachers of four-year high school courses must possess an equivalent of the life state certificate. Assistants may secure a special state certificate by first securing a county certificate in the county where they desire to teach and in addition passing a state examination upon all branches which they teach and which are not included in the county cer¬ tificate. Superintendents must all possess the unlimited state certificate. It will be thus seen that the entrance to teaching in the high schools of Wisconsin is very carefully guarded. The rigid provisions have raised the qualifications for teaching in Wisconsin very materially. The following figures show the qualifications of teachers in the Wisconsin high schools for 1903 and 1904; ^ Attended the Wisconsin State University.94 Attended other colleges.45 -139 Attended a normal school.71 Hold life certificates. 3 - 74 Total.213 Table showing number of teachers including principals in the four-year free high schools with highest school attended: Attended the Wisconsin State University.229 Attended universities and colleges outside the state .... 85 Attended Beloit College. 30 Attended Lawrence University. 40 Attended Ripon College. 13 Attended Milton College. 3 Attended Wisconsin normal schools.268 Hold licenses and certificates of approval or state certificates on exam¬ ination.131 Total.799 * Eleventh Biennial Report of the Department of Public Instruction, 1904, p 85. 6o8 NATIONAL EDUCATION ASSOCIATION [Secondary Concerning qualifications of principals of three-year high schools in the year 1903-4: Attended a normal school and hold normal-school diplomas . . 23 Attended a normal school and hold elementary certificates . . 3 Hold life certificates. 5 Holds a limited state certificate. i Holds a university diploma. i Total.33 Projession'il require)nents for high-school certificates. —Statistics concerning the actual amount of professional training of teachers are even more diflhcult to secure than those concerning academic qualifications. In those states where no differentiation is made between the licenses required of elementary teachers and high-school teachers there is little incentive to gain high-class certificates. In Iowa the third-grade certificate is the only legal requirement and a comparatively small number apply for state certificates. The main incentive to secure the state certificate is the fact that the state certificate is valid in any county of the state. Now that the county certificate will be valid in any county in the state the number of state certificates will doubtless be still further decreased. It is also desirable in many states when teachers move and find the state certificate necessary in the new state. County certificates in all states include some test on the theory and art of teaching, or didactics, as it is frequently called. But most county examina¬ tions in the theory of education are a perfect farce. The questions seldom require any technical knowledge of pedagogy. Anyone with an ounce of com¬ mon sense could answer them correctly. Most frequently when books are prescribed in the reading circle or by the superintendent as a basis for the examination some general book like Jean MitchelVs School or The Evolution of Dodd 's selected. While these are good enough in their way and wmuld afford a few hours pleasant reading and stimulate the better emotions, yet they give no real principles upon which to base a theory of education. Even in the state examinations the primer of the subject has scarcely been touched. In a few states definite syllabi are prepared giving an outline of the subjects, part'cular books to be read, etc. This plan gives the candidate a definite plan of work and sometimes happily convinces them that the surest and soundest method of preparing is to go to some good institution where they can receive proper training. Without exception all states include some professional work in the exami¬ nations for life certificates. A few (New York, for example), grant pro¬ visional or temporary state certificates to college graduates, even tho they have not included professional work in their course. Thus all who secure the life state certificates have gained some insight into pedagogical subjects. The subjects prescribed vary greatly, tho the history of education and psy¬ chology are usually included. As indicated above, the amount required is very meager. Qualitatively it is usually antiquated. In most states which validate college diplomas as state certificates a year’s daily work in psychology and education or a year in the latter, following a year Department] PREPARATION OF HIGH-SCHOOL TEACHERS 609 in the formerj is required. Even in those states the professional work required when the certificate is gained by examination is very meager. It is in no way the equivalent of the work done in the year or more in college. Any college graduate could prepare for the professional examination ordinarily given thru two weeks’ continuous careful reading of some elementary texts. This is entirely wrong and very inconsistent. The examinations in other subjects like botany, physics, and mathematics are put upon a technical basis and generally the questions are modern in nature. But the professional examina¬ tions are decidedly irritating to modern teachers of those subjects. Even an imperfect knowledge of a primer of the history of education, psychology, and of method would enable the candidate to pass. New York state has taken an advanced stand on the matter of professional training and prescribes the following work for the state certificate: in addi¬ tion to graduation from college, general and educational psycholog}^, ninety recitation hoirrs; history and principles of education, ninety hours; methods in teaching, sixty hours; observation, twenty hours. This would make a total of about seven hours a week for a year, or fourteen semester units. As previously mentioned, graduates may receive a provisional certificate for two years if they have not had the professional work, but before it can be made a permanent certificate they must pass an examination upon the professional work indicated. Those who secure state certificates by examination are required to pass a rigid examination in the professional subjects. This examination is made thoro if we are to judge from the syllabus issued by the state department. The syllabus contains a good outline of all the subjects and a fine list of references. It is thoroly technical and academic in character, and it sets a high pace for all other states. Several universities in New York, and doubtless several colleges, have arranged their work in the department of education to correspond with the state requirements. I have at hand outlines of the work as prescribed at Cornell, Syracuse, and at Columbia. All who receive the Teachers College diploma at Columbia must have completed three semester units of psychology, three units of educational psychology, three units in the history and principles of education, and three un’ts in the theory and practice of teaching some special subject. Those who receive a degree from the College of Education in Chicago are required to include for graduation eight majors in education, including the history of education, principles of education, educational psychology, and a course in general psychology. The University of Wisconsin, whose diplomas are recognized as state cer¬ tificates, provided prerequisite professional work has been included, requires ten semester units—three units in psychology, three units in either the history or principles of education or advanced educational psychology, and four units which may be elected from either the department of philosophy or the department of education. The state of Texas recognizes the,diploma from the University of Texas, 6 io NATIONAL EDUCATION ASSOCIATION [Secondary provided the prerequisite professional training has been included. The uni¬ versity prescribes as the professional work two semester units of school man¬ agement, four units in the methods and principles of teaching, four units in the psychology of education, two units in the psychology of development, and six elective hours in the department of education. California not only accredits the work of the university toward the state certificate, but will not grant a certificate to teachers in the high schools unless the candidate is a graduate of the university of California or an approved equivalent institution. In addition to the work required for the bachelor’s degree the candidate must have completed at least one year of graduate study in the University of California, or an approved university. This year of graduate study shall include one-half year of advanced academic study, part of the time at least being devoted to one or more of the subjects taught in the high school, and the remainder of the time must be spent in a well-equipped training school of secondary grade, directed by the department of education of the approved university. This repre¬ sents the high-water mark of requirements, both academic and pro¬ fessional, for teaching in the high schools in the United States. The professional work required by the department of education in the University of California includes three semester hours of the history of education, three hours in a study of secondary education, two hours of methods, and four hours in practice teaching. The department urges the study of philosophy and psychology as prerequisites, but does not require them. The Teachers College of the University of Missouri, whose diplomas are recognized as life state certificates, requires candidates to complete three semester hours of experimental psychology, and twenty-four hours of educa¬ tion. The work in education must include three hours in the history of education, the theory of teaching three hours, and from three to nine hours of practice teaching. In addition to the psychology and education require¬ ments, each candidate must complete at least eighteen semester hours in each subject in which the special certificate is sought. This gives almost ideal requirements for the state certificate to teach in high schools. II. THE UNIVERSITY AND THE COLLEGE AS TRAINING-SCHOOLS FOR HIGH-SCHOOL TEACHERS Ever since secondary schools were first founded the university and the college have been training-schools which have furnished the majority of their teachers. The German secondary schools have always been manned by the best products of the German universities and that tells the story of Germany’s enviable position in secondary education. Since the time of the founding of the “great public schools” in England. Oxford and Cambridge have furnished all the teachers for them. Tho they have not had the professional training of Germany’s matchless schoolmasters, yet they have been men of fine culture and broad training. In America Harvard and Yale in New England and William Department] PREPARATION OF HIGH-SCHOOL TEACHERS 6ii and Mary in the South at once began to place their graduates in the “grammar schools,” like the Boston Public Latin School, and later in the academies. The influence of these men representing the best culture of the times has had a marked effect. In the secondary school where inspiration and outlook are so essential to the life of the school the breadth of view which comes from college life is indispensable. It is lamentably true that these zealous young men and more recently women have often been woefully lacking in pedagogical insight, but their scholarship and vital touch with life have been more valuable than the mere drillmaster’s arts. With the advent of the normal school in 1839 an attempt was made to correct the deficiency in the pedagogical training of teachers. Naturally the pendulum svmng a long way in the other direction and methods and devices became a fetish. The normal schools went to seed on methods. Devices and details were eagerly pursued when principles should have been sought. The drillmaster became the ideal class teacher and the machine method- master the ideal superintendent. Normal-school graduates everyivhere in the eighties and nineties began to teach in the high schools and to occupy the superintendencies. When I was graduated from a Wisconsin normal school in 1890 graduates did not think of looking for a grade position, unless they happened to live in a large city. High-school positions and good principal- ships and superintendencies were readily secured by the men. Similar con¬ ditions obtained in all adjoining states. At the present time conditions are so changed that it is only in exceptional cases that the graduate of a normal school begins in a high school. Occasionally they begin in a small high school which does two or three years of high-school work. But usually the normal graduate commences in the grades or goes to some university to complete work for graduation. This makes quite an ideal course of training, for at the normal schools they become imbued with the teaching spirit and their university work gives them a scholastic baptism. Happily a new era has dawned in normal schools with reference to methods. They have been touched by the new spirit in psychology and child-study and are now, in general, seeking principles instead of devices. The normal school, generally speaking, is not fitted to train high-school teachers. There are, of course, some schools which are much better equipped than others. There are some large and aspiring ones which are lengthening their courses, providing laboratory and library facilities to such an extent that they are better able to accomplish this work than the one-horse colleges, but the organization of a normal school must ever be such as to limit its function to the training of elementary teachers. Just as soon as it transcends this function it ceases to be in the highest degree effective in training elementary teachers, for which they have all been designed. It then becomes an addi¬ tional state college or university, a duplication which most states do not desire. The high-school teacher needs, above all, a broad outlook upon life, deep and thoro scholarship, and liberality of attitude which is best promoted by the 6I2 NATIONAL EDUCATION ASSOCIATION [Secondary university atmosphere. The normal school, with its ten-weeks’ courses and ceaseless flitting about, its many exercises per day, the constant emphasis upon method rather than content, the excessive attention to the little details such as are largely necessary in training the immature and those who are to deal with details of elementary work, all militate against sound scholarship and liberality of mind. Most normal schools are so organized that students are admitted from the country school. These students are in constant con¬ tact with the most advanced. This necessitates leveling down to the plane of the most immature. The only place where the science of education can be adequately taught is in the university or in the few colleges. The institution must be equipped with a department devoted solely to education. No man straddling the chairs of philosophy, psychology, logic, ethics, and education can even have come to an independent educational philosophy, much less develop it in others. One burdened with several chairs and all the subjects within each may have students recite from textbooks but it is lame teaching. The work in education cannot even be done well where one man is required to cover all subjects within the department. President G. Stanley Hall says: I think preparation of secondary teachers should never be permitted in a normal school where primary teachers are trained, but should be entirely given over to the univer¬ sity. This is essentially the case in Germany.I think there is very little in common either in methods or matter in the curriculum proper for these classes of teachers. ^ Professor DeGarmo says: The most obvious distinction between the normal school and the university as a train¬ ing ground for secondary teachers is that the normal school is obliged by its conditions, its primary aims, and its traditions, to devote its chief energies to the preparation of ele¬ mentary teachers. Only in a large and general way can it devote more than a fraction of its attention to the training of teachers for secondary schools.^ These differences he regards as so fundamentally opposed in nature that any attempt to unite the two will result in the decreased efficiency of the normal school. President Van Liew, who speaks on the question after much experience as a normal-school man and who is a scholar of distinction, says: The weakness of the normal schools, especially in the matter of training secondary teachers, lies in its inability to supply large general culture. So far as secondary teachers are concerned, at least, it ought not to try it. 3 Charles B. Gilbert wrote: The ideal place for the training of secondary teachers is a teachers’ college of some sort attached to a university as a co-ordinate part, utilizing all the scholarly advantages of the university and adding the special training needed to make teachers .4 President Thompson of Ohio State University, in discussing the great need of developing teachers’ colleges in connection with the universities, said: * Fourth Yearbook, I, p. 84. ® Ibid., p. 89. 3 Ibid., p. 92. * Ibid., p. 102. Department] PREPARATION OF HIGH-SCHOOL TEACHERS 613 I think it goes without discussion that for the cause of education the teachers in our high schools should have the university spirit and that they ought to have college training. This argument is based not so much upon the particular subject studied as upon the superior value of association with university faculties and university methods. Our high schools have suffered for lack of such teachers on the one hand, and on the other hand they have suffered from having too many teachers whose normal-school training or other education has not been with a view to training them for high-school work. It would seem, therefore, that in some form the teachers’ college ought to be a part of the university organization. ^ In the same meeting President Babcock of Arizona, who has also had long experience with the Minnesota and-California systems, said: If the normal schools are going to train their students for grade-work frankly, honestly, without any pretensions or conceit, those who desire to go on for high-school work must go to the university, to the colleges or teachers’ colleges, which provide that sort of training. 2 My own belief in the necessity of university training for high-school teach¬ ing was definitely developed before I became a member of a university faculty. Immediately upon graduation from one of the best normal schools in the country I became a h gh-school principal. I soon came to the belief, and many times expressed it, that normal-training was insufficient preparation- for such work. At the earliest possible moment I supplemented my training by a university course before re-entering the public-school service. Later I was for two years a member of the faculty in the same normal school. I believe my colleagues there will bear witness that I continually urged that our graduates ought to complete a university course before beginning high- school work. That the function of the university and the normal school must be different, I believed then as firmly as I do now .3 The experience of the New York State Normal College ought to be valuable in determining the suitability of the normal school or the college in preparing high-school teachers. The Normal College was granted a charter in 1890 empowering it to confer degrees in pedagogy, hoping thereby to attract college and university graduates who would spend at least a year in post-graduate study along strictly professional lines. Those expectations have not been realized. During one year forty such students were in residence, but the number has declined because pedagogical courses in the meantime have been developed in colleges and universities. It was thought, too, at the time when the Normal College was chartered that the graduates from the classical courses offered at the Normal College would find positions in the high schools, but the demand for teachers of more liberal culture has increased so much since 1899, that probably not more than one-half of the graduates have found employ¬ ment in the secondary schools of the state. Consequently, the Normal College has not been able to meet the expectations or the demands of the state for college-bred teachers who have a proper knowledge of the science of education and the principles of pedagogy. . . . . The belief of educators, philosophers, and educated people alike has crystallized into the conviction that teachers who are to be employed in the high school, normal schools, for teachers’ training-classes, for teachers, and as instructors in manual * Trans, and Proc. Nat. Assoc, of State Universities, 1904, p. 43. » Ibid., p. 64. 3 My views of that time may be seen in an article in Education, May and June, 1898. 6i4 NATIONAL EDUCATION ASSOCIATION [Secondary training, domestic science, art, and other special subjects should be college graduates with a thoro knowledge of the general principles of pedagogy and the most advanced and most valuable methods of teaching their specialties. ^ The report points out that the normal schools are not equipped for pre¬ paring teachers for the high schools. In consequence all of the elementary work at the State Normal School has been abolished, the requirements for admission made equal to those maintained in eastern colleges, and a four-years’ course of study in the liberal arts and in pedagogics has been established. Tho there are many splendid teachers in our best high schools and a few in the smaller schools, yet the fact remains that our boys and girls in the most critical period of their lives are in control of immature, inexperienced young¬ sters. Some of these youths have large native ability, and special potential teaching qualities, and ultimately become good teachers. Some have good academic training also and after expensive experimenting upon the children become first-class teachers. Their enthusiasm, vigor, cheerfulness, and general culture are all qualities that we ought to retain, but the fact remains that our optimism regarding secondary-school teaching must come from viewing the select few rather than from conditions as a whole. The greatest defect in our American schools is the lack of uniformity of requirements for teaching. Under our ultra-democratic notions some prop¬ erly fitted teachers enter the work, but they are obliged to come into compe¬ tition with a majority who are unprepared. Frequently because of ignorance on'the part of boards and often because of nepotism the incompetent cheap teachers drive the worthier ones out of the market or force them down to the lower level of salaries. The inadequate compensation is the great deterrent which keeps thousands of the most promising from ever entering into the undesirable competition. We are greatly in need of legislation in all states which will permit only the absolutely well-trained to enter the ranks. The cry frequently raised against such legislation that the schools would be without teachers is sheer nonsense. When our colleges and universities can find such abundant sup¬ plies of doctors of philosophy for every subordinate instructorship there need be no difficulty in securing all the adequately prepared teachers necessary, if liv'ng salaries are offered. Legislation eliminating the unfit would raise the salaries. In all those states having laws requiring teachers to possess high-grade certificates the salaries are demonstrably above the average paid in those states without such protective legislation. Although the statutory provisions are very insufficient in requiring ade¬ quate preparation for teaching in the high schools, yet many cities have made regulations which require all to be college graduates. In Ft. Dodge, Iowa, for example, all are required to be college graduates and to have had two years’ experience. There are hundreds of cities large and small where either * An. Rep. Ed. Dept., p. 274 . Department] PREPARATION OF HIGH-SCHOOL TEACHERS 6 ^ definite legislation to this effect has been enacted or else the practice has become local common law. The North Central Association of Colleges and Secondary Schoo’s has had a very marked effect in raising standards of teaching in the high schools. No school can become accredited unless all the teachers are col’ege graduates or the equivalent One high-school inspector wrote me : We have about fifty high schools on the north central list and many more are trying for admission. This requirement has been most wholesome in its effect on our schools, and has done more than any other one provision in our recent educational history. Of course there has been a gradual increase in the number of college graduates occupying high-school positions, but it has simply been the law of evolution, a sort of triumph of the fittest. The normal school .... has in the past filled a good many positions, and many of the school authorities have been unable to distinguish between them and graduates of other institutions. The influence of the North Central Association, the increased effici¬ ency of our denominational colleges and the gradual increase of salaries have all contrived to drive them (the normal-school graduates) out of the field of the best schools except in a few isolated cases. III. STANDARDS IN GERMANY The training required of the German secondary-school teacher is much more ideal than that demanded of teachers in the same kind of schoolwork in the United States. In Germany advanced, critical, academic, and professional scholarship are absolute prerequisites to teaching in the secondary schools. No deviations are allowed. No mere pull with the board will suffice, for the matter does not rest with the local board, but with the state authorities. In Germany all secondary-school teachers are university trained, as they ought to be everywhere. The candidates for a position in the secondary schools must have had at least three years of university study before being ad¬ mitted to the examination for the state certificate, which all must possess. This means a high grade of academic scholarsh’p since university entrance is con¬ ditioned upon graduation from the secondary schools, which is fully equiva¬ lent to the completion of the sophomore year in our very best colleges. There¬ fore everyv teacher in the German secondary schools has done work equivalent to that required for our masters’ degree. As a matter of fact, the majority of German secondary-school teachers have studied more than three years in a university. The majority are possessors of the doctorate degree which cannot be secured with less than three years of un’.versity work and usually requires four or five. Each teacher is required to present a major line of work and a minor. The examination in the minor must reveal complete comprehension and mastery of the subject far beyond any limits to which it is taught in the secondary school. Even with this preparation they are not permitted to give instruction in that branch in the advanced classes of the school. In the major subject not only thoro mastery is required but there must be evidence of critical and exhaustive research to the extent of becoming not only a master but an authority. A thesis in the major must reveal independence of method, acquaintance with the history and literature of the subject. The thesis and 6i6 NATIONAL EDUCATION ASSOCIATION [Secondary the examination are intended to test the candidates’ knowledge of its philo¬ sophic aspects. In a genera' way we may say that the academic training of the German secondary-school teacher is quite on a par w th the attainments of instructors in our best colleges, and the majority are comparable with well- seasoned professors. Promotions are so slow there that the majority are about th rty years of age before securing permanent positions. Knowledge of subject-matter, however, is happily deemed insufficient for any German teacher. All teachers in the secondary schools are required to include -psychology, philosophy, and theoretical pedagogy in the state exami¬ nation. In addition, they must take a two-years’ course of professional training. This can be begun only after passing the state exam nation. IV. STANDARDS SUGGESTED FOR AMERICAN SCHOOLS I. As minimum requirements it seems fair to ask that all teachers who enter high-school work should have had at least the equivalent of a college education. To accept less is to place the schools in charge of immature, unscholarly boys and girls and undeserving place-hunters. The high schools are the people’s colleges and should ever remain centers of liberal culture. That they can never be when in charge of teachers wffio have never learned to love scholarship. I am of the ffi*m belief that only in exceptional instances should teachers be permitted to teach in our high schools who have not actually studied in a standard higher institution. Those who preferred to acquire certificates thru examination only should be required to pass most search ng exam nations. What if an occasional deserv ng individual were thus debarred ? In most states the right to practice med’cine is w thheld from all except those who have studied in a reputable medical college. No mere private study and cramming for the examinations will suffice. The right to enter the examination, as in Germany, is conditioned by previous study for a term of years i a repu¬ table institution. The theory is—and perfectly sound—that no one can ga’n adequate knowledge of modern methods of medicine without coming directly in contact with properly equipped laboratories and skilled teachers. Thru private study of books the diligent might accomplish much, but the r’sks to society are too great to admit of trifling. Hence the necessity of measures which will protect society. Many states have similar protective legislation in the profession of law. Are the needs not as great in teaching? The results of mistakes are not always so immediately apparent to the public in education as in medicine, but to the specialist in education they cannot be hidden. Why intrust the most precious possessions of the human race to the ruthless hands of ignorant beginners and confirmed quacks and charlatans ? Every poor teacher helps to spoil scores of children every year, while the quack doctor of medicine occasionally harms an indiv dual. The malpractice of the inexpert teacher is tenfold more harmful to society than that of the quack doctor. The teacher guilty of malpractice dwarfs, and distorts, poisons the mind and body of the Department] PREPARATION OF HIGH-SCHOOL TEACHERS 617 budding, developing child, while the quack doctor merely fails to cure bodily disease. The quack teacher sows the seeds of disease, the quack doctor simply fails to cure. 2. From the professional side the minimum requirements should be at least one full year of daily work in education subsequent to a half-year of work in psychology. It would be still better, and not excessive, to demand that one-sixth of the college course should be given to educational and philo¬ sophical subjects. This should be so distributed as to give about one-half year daily to general psychology, a full year daily to the principles of educa¬ tion and child-study, and the remainder of the time to the history of education, methods, school systems, etc. If one-fourth of the 120 units of the college course could be professional, the following arrangement would be desirable; psychology, 6 semester hours; principles of education, 6; child-study, 2; methods,- 4; h'story of education, 4; secondary education, 4; observation and practice, 4. The Germans are wise in requiring actual residential study in a university as a prerequisite to teaching in the secondary schools. (Normal-school study is required of all who teach in the elementary schools.) It ’s practica ly impossible for one to gain modern ideas of scholarship without institutional training. Even if possible, other methods are too uncertain and expensive. Private study may give one certain book facts but nothing can be substituted for the laboratory methods of the modern institution. The teacher who is to teach classes by modern laboratory methods must first have been thru the laboratory work himself. The teacher who is to teach literary and historical subjects must know what libraries contain and how to utilize them. This can only be secured thru contact with them. It is preposterous to think that men may be intrusted to equip laboratories and libraries when they know nothing of them. Yet such things are permitted and encouraged by our inadequate protective legislation. The Honorable J. Sterling Morton eloquently emphasized the importance of professional training for teachers when he said: We demand for Nebraska educated educators. We demand professionally trained teachers, men and women of irreproachable character and well-tested abilities. We demand from our legislature laws raising the standard of the profession and exalting the office of the teacher. As the doctor of medicine or the practitioner of law is only admitted within the pale of his calling upon the production of his parchment or certificate, so the applicant for the position of instructor in our primary and other schools should be required by law to first produce his diploma, his authority to teach, from the normal schools. We call no uneducated quack or charlatan to perform surgery upon the bodies of our children lest they may be deformed, crippled, or maimed physically all their lives. Let us take equal care that we intrust the development of the mental faculties to skilled instruc¬ tors of magnanimous character, that the mentalities of our children may not be mutilated, deformed and crippled to halt and limp through all the centuries of their never-ending lives. The deformed body will die, and be forever put out of sight under the ground, but a mind made monstrous by bad teaching dies not, but stalks forever among the ages, an immortal mockery of the divine image. 6 i8 NATIONAL EDUCATION ASSOCIATION [Secondaxy XIII {special). THE PROFESSIONAL PREPARATION OF SECONDARY TEACHERS IN THE FIFTEEN SOUTHERN STATES^ EDWARD FRANKLIN BUCHNER, PROFESSOR OF PHILOSOPHY AND EDUCATION, UNIVERSITY OF ALAB.AJIA This report attempts to sketch the conditions relating to the preparation of secondary teachers prevailing n the southern states of the United States. It is based upon information gathered by a circular letter of inquiry distributed in April, 1906. School ofiScials, - ncluding state superintendents of education, presidents of state universities, principals of (state) normal schools, and super¬ intendents of public schools in the larger and more representative cities stated such requirements as were in actual force and described such customs as were practiced in the matter of the preparation of teachers for high schools. The states of Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Louisiana, iSIary- land, Mississippi, Missouri, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Virginia, and West Virginia, and the city of Washington, D. C., were about equally represented among the replies sent in. Extensive information, furnished by the United States Commissioner of Education, based upon returns to his office two and more years ago, has also been used in the preparation of this report. The interest 'n this inquiry concerning the requirements and customs pertaining to the preparation of secondary teachers centered around the four points mentioned in the letters of inquiry. 1. AVhat scholastic preparation and what pedagogical training are required of high-school teachers in your state or city ? 2. What courses of academic instruction, especially for high-school teachers, are given in your institution ? 3. What courses of pedagogical instruction for high-school teachers are given in your institution ? 4. Can high-school teachers in your state, city, or institution get actual practice previous to regular employment ? These four quesfons can well serve us as guides in telling the story of the preparation of high-school teachers in the South as practiced today. The exact statements in the replies are used as far as possible in the hope of making the report more historic than it would be if it presented only a general summary of present tendencies. THE REQUIREMENT OF SCHOLARSHIP AND TRAINING Alabama: In this, as in most other southern states, the high school is a non-legal institution. It is not named in the educational laws of the state. The first-grade teacher’s certificate specifies by law, among other subjects, three high-school subjects; algebra, * Legislative enactments relative to high schools made in some states during the interval between the preparation and the publication of this report render some of its statements purely historical. The immediate design of the work of the committee would be seriously modified if the attempt were made to incorporate these laws into this sur^’ey of existing conditions. Department] SECONDARY TEACHERS IN SOUTHERN STATES 619 geometry, and physics. But any teacher holding the lowest (third) grade certificate may legally teach in any high school in the state. Such specific requirements as exist are determined hy the city systems acting under their own educational charters. While Birmingham reserves the right to examine all applicants for high-school positions, it also has a general rule which requires applicants to be college graduates. In Mobile the teacher must be a graduate of a college or university “of good standing,” or pass an examination on algebra, geometry, trigonometry, Latin, general history, Alabama history, English and American literature, rhetoric, physics, physiology, and pedagogy. In Montgomery the teacher to be eligible for appointment must hold a high-school certificate, which requires an examination in algebra, arithmetic, geometry, higher English, Latin, physiology, and theory and practice of teaching. Arkansas: There is no legal specification as to what examinations secondary teachers shall be required to stand, either academic or pedagogic. The custom relative to these requirements may be exhibited by the practice of three cities. Hot Springs requires the teacher to “be a Bachelor of Arts or a Master of Arts from our best colleges or universities with successful teaching experience;” Little Rock mentions “college education—successful experience or normal-school training;” while in Pine Bluff the teacher “must be a graduate of a standard high school, normal school, college, or university, possess a knowledge of at least three standard works on pedagogy, and experience during one session as substitute worker.” Florida: The law specifies requirements of principals of high schools in terms of the first-grade certificate. This is issued to teachers of some experience (at least two years) who pass examinations in geometry, trigonometry, botany, zoology, physics, rhetoric, literature, general history, Caesar and Vergil (two books each), and psychology. Only one city reports attempts on its part to get college graduates as its high-school teachers. Georgia: There is no legal requirement beyond the customary certificate necessary for teachers in state-aided schools. Augusta requires that the teachers “should be gradu¬ ates of a reputable college and a .specialist in the department.” Columbus requires “specialized university training for departmental work;” while Macon simply specifies a “diploma from a first-class college or university.” Kentucky: Kentucky has made no legal provision for, and neither supports nor controls high schools. The requirements in practice vary with the cities employing teachers. “Some accept state certificates, state diplomas, or degrees from colleges. Others hold special examinations.” “An A.B. degree and three years’ experience or a nine-months’ course of pedagogical training is required. The degree must be from an accredited college, or recognized by the Regents’ Board of Examiners of New York” (Covington). In recent years “a college degree is required of all high-school teachers in Louisville not in the manual department. No definite pedagogical training is required. Heads of departments must have had previous successful experience. Untrained assistants are frequently employed.” Paducah requires only the “equivalent of a four-years’ uni¬ versity course.” Louisiana: “There is no provision in the school law regarding the qualifications of high-school teachers as distinguished from other teachers; but high-school teachers are usually either college graduates, graduates of the state normal school, or holders of the first-grade teachers’ certificates. The examination for this certificate covers a high- school course of study with some pedagogical subjects added.” Another report on the prevailing custom says, “usually a normal-school graduate, often a college graduate is chosen.” “They are required to be college graduates, or the equivalent, and to pursue professional study during the summer” (Baton Rouge). “Applicants for positions in our high schools are •required to pass an academic examination, and to have had three years’ teaching experience or a certificate from a normal training-school” (New Orleans). The high-school faculty of Shreveport is composed “of college and university graduates with years of practical experience.” 620 NATIONAL EDUCATION ASSOCIATION [Secondary Maryland: “Most of our high-school teachers are college graduates; the equivalent is pretty generally demanded. Not much pedagogical training is expected—rarely any.” Baltimore states its requirements thus: “ Fitness for appointment to teach in the high schools shall be determined by careful scrutiny of such diplomas or certificates of graduation as may be issued by colleges of good repute, or by an examination, oral or written, disclosing equivalent qualifications in the subject or subjects which the candidate proposes to teach^ Proof of success in the actual work of teaching as well as the possession of the requisite knowledge will be considered.” Mississippi: Beyond the usual certificates, the state has no regulations. Columbus requires “a first-grade teacher’s license on the state-required studies, and at least one year’s experience.” “ Greenville requires that high-school teachers must have at least four years’ ^ training in a university or approved college.” Missouri: This is the only southern state in which the development of the high school has reached such a stage as to be made interesting by the acute opposition between the state department of education and the highest educational agency in the state for the training of teachers. The state on its part regards the public high school “as thoroly a part of the public-school system,” but it makes “no specific provision by law for the train¬ ing of high-school teachers.” It “is unalterably opposed to creating an institution for the special purpose of preparing high-school teachers.” High-school teachers must hold a first-grade county certificate, a state certificate, or a normal-school certificate—but this is not specified by law so as to distinguish them from elementary teachers. “ From now on high-school teachers who have charge of departments must be college graduates. Np requirement has yet been formulated in regard to their pedagogical train¬ ing. Practically we employ no one without experience” (Carthage). In Hannibal “a college, university, or normal-school training” is required. St. Joseph mentions a prepa¬ ration of a “ grade of a reputable college, with specialization on line taught,” while St. Louis seeks “usually a suitable university degree and evidences of successful experience.” "North Carolina: Beyond the certificate issued by the county superintendent upon examination, no special preparation is required by law. Asheville has instituted “the high-school class” of teachers, which shall comprise “graduates of an approved university or normal college, with three or more years of successful experience in a city graded system of known efficiency,” and teachers who “have taught seven years in the Asheville schools or its equivalent in a good city school system elsewhere and present evidences of systematic work and study under the direction of some person or institution of accredited worth.” “All our high-school teachers are graduates of reputable colleges. We do not require pedagogical training, but encourage it in our selection of teachers” (Durham). Raleigh has no rule in this matter to guide in the selection of teachers; but “all are elected because of some particular qualifications for the work to be done.” South Carolina has been working on a legislative bill for the organization and aid of high schools. The provisions for the preparation of teachers proposed therein hardly belong to this report of present conditions. Columbia represents the situation thus: “No regular standard has been established, but we always get the very best teachers we can secure for the salary paid.” Another city laconically notes the single fact that “greater care is exercised in selecting high-school teachers” than the teachers for lower grades. Tennessee: The law regulating the certification of teachers in this state implies a recognition of the high school. Its certificates are classed as “secondary” and “primary.” There are three kinds of the former: first-grade secondary (on diploma), first-grade second¬ ary (on examination), and second-grade secondary (on examination). Graduation from the state Peabody Normal College meets the requirements for the first kind of certificate. Beyond this implication, the requirements for high-school teachers are left wholly in the hands of the local school boards. The usual custom in the cities, as described by one, “is to secure as far as possible graduates from the University of Tennessee or Peabody Department] SECONDARY TEACHERS IN SOUTHERN STATES 621 Normal College.” In the language of another the custom is that the teachers shall be “graduates of some reputable college.” Texas: The requirement is merely “the possession of a city or state teacher’s cer¬ tificate of a first grade or a permanent grade, sometimes of a college diploma.” “There is no law in this state which specially prescribes the scholastic preparation or the pedagogical training of high-school teachers. Every city and town is a law unto itself in this matter.” “There is an unwritten law not to employ any teacher in the Austin high school who is not a college or university graduate.” Dallas seeks “to secure thoroly educated, well-trained teachers of successful experience.” ^Fort Worth “ as far as possible gets gradu¬ ates of colleges—these being better than the normal-school graduates.” Without any requirement being in force, “most of the teachers of the Houston high school are graduates of the State University of Texas or of some institution of equal standing.” San Antonio selects its teachers “from an eligible list who pass the high-school examination.” Waco “rarely elects a high-school teacher who does not hold a diploma of a recognized college or university; some experience in teaching (in lower grades or in a high school elsewhere) is required.” ViRGEsriA: The following legal requirement obtains: “Persons desiring to teach in the public high schools of Virginia shall be examined on such public high-school branches as they may be required to teach; provided, that graduates of colleges and universities of approved standing and reputation, shall be permitted, without further examination, to teach in such schools the branches in which they have beeil graduated.” Pedagogical training other than theory and practice (“usually as found in some one single text on peda¬ gogy”) is not required. Danville makes no requirements. Even in the absence of a rule, all teachers in Lynch¬ burg are college graduates. Norfolk requires them to be “graduates of a satisfactory university or college on the subjects they are to teach.” West Virginia. In the absence of a state law, the custom in the best high schools of requiring the Bachelor of Arts degree in a high-grade school has become “nearly univer¬ sal.” Among the others, normal-school graduates are chiefly in demand. The training requirement is badly overlooked by all of them. Usually experience has been had in the lower grades. A majority of the teachers in Charleston, Fairmont, Huntington, and Parkersburg are coUege graduates. “ The recent practice in ^Vheeling has been to appoint only college graduates with experience in teaching.” Washington, D. C., specifies two requirements: “(i) College degree and passing an examination for high-school teachership; (2) Normal graduates with five years’ experi¬ ence as a teacher in a high school, except possibly as to graduates of local normal schools.” ACADEMIC INSTRUCTION PROVIDED ESPECIALLY FOR SECONDARY TEACHERS 'The information gathered by the second question is very meager. There are but few institutions (probably three) in the South which attempt to prepare high-school teachers by devising courses of study particularly adapted to such preparation or by indicating something of the work which ought to be taken as a part of such preparation. Partly to indicate the existing attitude toward this factor, and partly to record existing conditions in the academic training of secondary teachers, detailed mention will be made of this information, even at the risk of greater monotony of record than in the preceding section of this report. Alabama presents no academic instruction especially designed for high-school teachers. The usual high-school subjects are taught in high schools, normal schools, and some of the colleges, but not with a view to the preparation of the teachers of them in high schools. The standard conception seems to be that going over these subjects in the progress of one’s 622 NATIONAL EDUCATION ASSOCIATION [Secondary pursuit of the secondary curriculiun is sufficient preparation for giving instruction in the same subjects. This remark applies to almost all other southern states with equal force. Arkansas yielded no information, and even showed some misunderstanding of the point involved. One city reports: “Latin, modern languages. Our high school is the regular accredited high or secondary school.” Another conducts “reviews once each month on English, mathematics, science, history.” Florida: The University of Florida, lately reorganized, has under way an A.B. course in pedagogy. The academic work will, at the end of the sophomore year, qualify for the state certificate which requires examination in geometry, trigonometry, botany, zoology, physics, literature, general history, Caesar and Vergil (two books each), and psychology. Georgia : Beyond the usual courses of study in aU the higher grades of institutions, which are open to and taken by those who may become, and who may now be, high-school teachers, no courses of study are offered for such preparation. In one institution regular college elective courses are significantly regarded as especially designed for high-school teachers. Kentucky: The State College offers two courses designed to prepare teachers for high-school work. One is a college course (foiu* years) and leads to the degree of Bachelor of Pedagogy. “The entrance requirements to the freshman class are on a par with those of other colleges in the South.” The other is the state-diploma course, and covers the work of the high school and about the first year in college. There is much psychology and theoretical pedagogy in each coarse. The completion of either course entitles the person to a life-certificate to teach in Kentucky. Louisiana: Although a high-school course of study has been graded, outlined, and adopted by the State Department of Education, no institution has devised instruction especially designed for the academic preparation of secondary teachers. The new depart¬ ment of philosophy and education in the Louisiana State University introduces academic subjects of collegiate grade in its four-years’ course leading to the Bachelor of Arts degree, but they are only the courses given to all other academic students. Maryland: “The state normal schools offer no courses. Several colleges are state aided, and supply many secondary teachers; but they offer no course especially designed for secondary teachers.” Missouri: The State Department is opposed to such instruction. But the University of Missouri has notably developed a Teachers College'originally intended to prepare high- school teachers. Recently it has added instruction designed to prepare elementary teachers as well. For the preparation of high-school teachers it provides (in addition to courses available in the department of liberal arts, the usual undergraduate courses) the following academic courses: agronomy (3 hrs.), manual training for high-school teachers (6 hrs.), advanced algebra (3 hrs.), trigonometry, and analytical geometry (3 hrs.), physiography of North America and Europe (3 hrs.), meteorology (3 hrs.), physical geography (3 hrs.), botany (two courses 6 hrs.), elocution (3 hrs.), English (two courses 6 hrs.), German (3 hrs.), Latin (Cicero and Vergil 3 hrs.), Greek (Anabasis 3 hrs.), Greek literature in English translation (3 hrs.), history of Greece (3 hrs.), history of Rome (3 hrs.), the evolu¬ tion of cultivated plants (3 hrs.), general physics (3 hrs.), and experimental physics (3 hrs.). This plan of work is not committed to, but tends to prepare for, departmental teaching in the high school. Cape Girardeau Normal School claims to be “a teachers’ college and offers a full college course in the languages, mathematics, history, English, and the sciences, in addition to its professional courses.” But none of this is specified as designed for the secondary teacher. Warrensburg State Normal School: “We grant our diploma to graduates of A.B. courses or of first-class four-year high schools without much requirement along academic lines.” North Carolina, South Carolina, and Tennessee offer nothing beyond the courses provided for all students in imiversities, colleges, and normal schools. Texas: The University of Texas has a school of education, but not a teachers’ college Department] SECONDARY TEACHERS IN SOUTHERN STATES • 623 The idea that the future teacher in a high school needs special preparation prevails here to a certain extent, but not in a completely differentiated form. This is evidenced by the policy, waived in exceptional cases, of recommending persons for high-school positions in the state of Texas only when they have completed specified academic courses, and also by the practice of urging students preparing to be secondary teachers to take certain courses while receiving their academic training. Thus, before a person is recommended as a secondary teacher of Latin he must have taken in Latin three full college courses; in German, four and two-thirds full courses or their equivalent; in English, four full courses; in mathematics, three full courses; while in chemistry the student is urged to take nine full and partial courses. Virginia offers no courses especially for high-school teachers. West Virginia University “offers sixteen courses for high-school teachers and others” in its department of education. PEDAGOGICAL INSTRUCTION PROVIDED FOR SECONDARY TEACHERS Alabama: The University of Alabama provides junior and senior years’ courses on genetic psychology, principles of education (presupposing psychology, logic, and ethics), and history of education, in which the problems of secondary education receive consider¬ able attention, but the courses are not specifically designed for high-school teachers in preparation for their work. In common with like institutions in Georgia, North Carolina, Tennessee, and Virginia, it has a faculty member, maintained by the General Education Board, who devotes his efforts to establishing in the state a policy of public high schools. Some of the instruction given in these state universities mentioned below results from this movement of the General Education Board. The normal schools give the usual courses on psychology or psychology in education, history of education, theory and practice of teaching, school management and methods, but not for high-school teachers as such. Probably most of this instruction, as elsewhere, pertains to the lower grades of school work, when not treating of “education in general.” The larger cities sometimes have means for pedagogical work on the part of high-school teachers already in the service. This usually consists of “monthly meetings of teachers where some author on pedagogical sub¬ jects or school management is studied.” The superintendent or principal selects the works which are thus read and discussed. Arkansas: Pine Bluff has bimonthly meetings of teachers for regular courses in psy¬ chological reading and instruction. Florida: At the University of Florida, students in pedagogy devote from one-fifth to one-fourth of their time on psychology, methods, school economy, and history of educa¬ tion. Georgia: The University of Georgia provides courses for junior- and senior-year students on history of, science of, and principles of education and school management, including the general subject of secondary education. The latter considers “especially the relation of the high school to the common schools, the colleges, and the community at large, its course of study, organization, and methods in America and the leading European countries.” Kentucky: Nothing is offered in the state beyond “the usual professional” courses. Louisiana State University by its new department of philosophy and education attempts, among other things, “to aid in increasing the scope and development of high schools, to qualify teachers for the higher grades of work in high schools and junior colleges, and to prepare teachers as supervisors, principals, and parish superintendents.” The pedagogical courses are so arranged and balanced with required and elective academic courses as to occupy from one to four years, and lead to the Bachelor of Arts degree. In addition to the usual courses on education and cognate subjects, it has one course on methods (one year) “especially in secondary subjects” which also treats of the “aim, scope, and function of the high school.” 624 NATIONAL EDUCATION ASSOCIATION [Secondary Maryland: “None offered in the state.” Mississippi: A decade or more ago the University of Mississippi actively began a policy of fostering high schools in the state and extending their courses of study with a view to meeting college-entrance requirements. It has done little, however, on the peda¬ gogical lines of interest in this inquiry. Missouri: The Teachers College of the State University offers the most extended facilities along professional lines for high-school teachers to be found in the southern states. In addition to several courses designed for elementary teachers, the following are given especially for high-school teachers: educational psychology (half year, presupposing half year of experimental psychology), principles of education (half vr.), secondary education (half yr), practice teaching for high-school teachers (i yr.), the teaching of German (2 hrs., half }u), teaching of Latin and Greek (half yr.), teaching of Greek and Roman history (i hr., half )t.), the teaching of mathematics (2 hrs., half yr.), the teaching of physics (2 hrs., half yr.), the teaching of geography (2 hrs., half yr.) in part for high-school teachers, and the following which are open to such teachers but are not described as designed for any specific grade of teachers: teachers’ conference on botany (2 hrs., half }t.), the teaching of English (2 hrs., half yr.), teachers’ course on elocution (i hr., half yr.), and the teaching of art. Washington University offers five courses on pedagogy, but not specifically for second¬ ary teachers. The City of Carthage requires “two promotional examinations,” or one examination and one term in a summer school approved by the superintendent. North Carolina offers nothing. South Carolina: The University of South Carolina offered a new course last year on the “ Pedagogics of the high school, a two-hour half-year course, elective to junior and senior students, which comprised the work of seven co-instructors, treating of secondary education, and of English, Latin, history, mathematics, geography, and nature-study in the high school. Tennessee: The University of Tennessee offers besides the usual pedagogical courses “a course in secondary education, including the psychology and pedagogy of adolescence, the history of secondary education, the comparative study of secondary schools in America and the principal culture nations of Europe, and some specific high-school problems in this section.” Texas: The University of Texas, in addition to the usual courses in general method, psychology, child-study, school management, history of education, and philosophy of educa¬ tion, designed to aid secondary teachers, principals, and superintendents of schools, offers the following “professional” courses: secondary education (3 hrs., one-third year), botani¬ cal method (3 hrs., one-third yr.), the teaching of elementary mathematics (3 hrs., one- third }T., partly for high-school teachers), the teaching of Latin (3 hrs., two-thirds yr.), and the teaching of manual training. \hRGiNiA: The University of Virginia offers a one-year’s (3 hrs.) course in each of the following: secondary education, philosophy and psychology of education, principles of education, history of education, and school administration. These are not primarily designed for high-school teachers. West Virginia University offers nothing beyond what was mentioned in the second section of this report. PRACTICE TEACHING IN THE HIGH SCHOOL PREVIOUS TO EMPLOYMENT The existing condition is best described by the prevalence of the custom which either neglects this element in the preparation of the high-school teacher, or, if recognized and insisted upon, is relegated to some other institution or to some distant high school, if not frequently to training and experience in lower grades of schoolwork. This is probably the factor most foreign in the training Department] SECONDARY TEACHERS IN SOUTHERN STATES 625 of secondary teachers. Even many training or normal schools recognize the fact that many of their students have had “experience” in school teaching before taking up their courses of study, and, consequently, lighten or lessen - the amount of work done in practice teaching. Alabama: The Troy Normal College Practice School does “some high-school work” in its last grade, and to this extent its graduates have practice before employment. Birm¬ ingham requires heads of departments to have had experience in teaching before appoint¬ ment. In Mobile some teachers are promoted from the grades to the high school vdthout having had high-school practice; some high-school teachers have had experience in high- school work elsewhere. Arkansas: Cities in this state commonly have a “cadet class, the members of which practice in the schools as substitute workers.” Georgia: “Chiefly in common schools during course.” Augusta depends “on other colleges for the training of our teachers.” ISIacon requires “practice work two hours a day in our school. After they complete a noruial course, we use them a year (probation) as supernumerary teachers, and afterwards employ in our public schools as regular teachers those whose work is satisfactory.” Kentucky: State College: “Some limited practice is given to students in regular comses, but it does not constitute any part of the required course.” Louisville: No. “We usually employ some one who has had previous experience in some other school system.” They found that employing college graduates (in the Girls’ High School) without previous practice did not give good results. Louisiana: “Not as yet,”'as one writer puts it. Maryland: Only the practice “designed to prepare elementary teachers,” as one return very frankly puts it. Mississippi: The custom is not based on as good practices as in other states, this state not having any normal schools, even. ^klissoURi: Most Missouri high-school teachers are college graduates “who have thru summer schools and the regular terms of our state normals or Teachers College, received pedagogical training.” “Missouri is unalterably opposed to creating an institution for the special purpose of preparing high-school teachers. Our best high-school teachers are not those who have been specially prepared for that work. They are our best educated people who grow into the ability to manage high schools thru having managed lower grade school work thoroly” (State Department of Education.). In the high school connected with Teachers College of the State University, provision is made for definite practice teaching in high-school work in the training of the teachers. “Before certificates to teach in high schools are given, candidates must prove their ability to do work in those subjects for which they wish certificates. Three to nine hours’ credit is required. This is done under the immediate supervision of the professor of theory and practice of teaching, assisted by others of the Teachers College faculty.The school is, in a sense, experimental, as inexperienced teachers are called upon to test theories and methods suggested to them.” Cape Girardeau State Normal School plans the introduction of high-school practice in its training of teachers a year hence. Outside these schools, the general plan in this state for securing practice in high-school teaching is by serving as “apprentice teacher.s in the schools of a large city.” North Carolina: The plan begun last year at Durham is this: “We take a few prospective teachers and give them practice work in our high school. Such applicants must be college graduates. They join our training class and spend their time in the classrooms while the school is in session.” South Carolina: “No provision for such practice is known.” 626 NATIONAL EDUCATION ASSOCIATION [Secondary Tennessee: “Unfortunately there is not opportunity for students to get such practice.” Texas: The State University and normal schools have made no provision for practice teaching nor for adequate observation. “In some cities by means of a system of super¬ numerary teachers they can.” Austin: “We do not employ teachers who have not had practice.” Dallas: “We do not employ inexperienced teachers for high-school work.” Virginia: “No.” “In our grammar schools” only. “Practice at our normal schools.” West Virginia: The Huntington Normal School admits students of the training department who expect to do high-school work to the classes of the regular academic department, which more than covers the high-school courses, and practice teaching under the superintendent of the training department. SUPPLEMENTARY REPORT At the request of the chairman of the committee, the following is offered in response to the two nquiries. 1. What professional preparation is desirable for southern secondary- school teachers ? and, 2. What professional preparation is possible under existing conditions for southern secondary-school teachers ? The high school of the South possesses problems which are not marked by any geographical pecul arity. These problems are national and not local. If any peculiarity obtains it is due primarily to its historical descent from the old-time southern classical academy. This historic connection will, in large measure, explain the presence of the classical or literary flavor which obtains and also the custom of college graduates becoming secondary teachers. The industrial or technical high school in the South is the exception. It is also a mistake to assume or maintain that the secondary school in the South materially differs from that in other sections of the United States. The factors of waste in the population and the economic conditions for developing native resources and sustaining human industries do not, aside from imiting the material resources of high schools, determine the question of the southern high school for the whites. It is chiefly the high school for the negro which has its questions determined by those conditions as related to the negro. One fact which indicates that southern high schools cannot be regarded as sui generis is the employment in them of teachers prepared by northern insti¬ tutions. The pursuit of studies in the latter by native southern teachers points in the same direction. The demand for professional secondary training is therefore the same in the South as in the North; or, to be more accurate, is growing to be the same. The above report on existing conditions indicates the widespread recognition of this demand. There are a few features in secondary training made desirable, if not necessary, by reason of their intimate relation to successful secondary teaching. The best high schools of the day are, and all high schools of the future will be, departmental. This is required for efficiency, and indicates the degree of scholarship needful for high-school work. But secondary teaching tends to become too exclusively departmental so as to prevent the teachers getting a Department] SECONDARY TEACHERS IN SOUTHERN STATES 627 sufficient knowledge of the pupil as an individual who has passed up thru definite school processes. High-school teachers forget the childhood of the pupil which has been passed in the grades. No less do they lack a sense of the unity in the work of the high school as a whole. Correlation of all the secondary-school factors is necessary, and this can be made real only thru adequate professional training. Under existing conditions there are three means, suggested by actual experience in the administration of high schools, available for equipping teachers more effectively for the high school; 1. City systems could require that college graduates aspiring to high-school positions should become elementary teachers, for a time at least. This would make the schools responsible for “professionalizing” their own teachers. 2. Normal schools could add to the work they are already doing a depart¬ ment designed to prepare secondary teachers. This is possible in all the states, except Arkansas and Mississippi, where state normal schools do not exist. 3. Colleges and universities could add a year’s course of study, which, presupposing the Bachelor’s degree, would provide special preparation for the secondary teacher. This work would be an intensive study of what I call the pedagogy of the high school. This would include the history of the high school (particularly in the United States), the psychology of adoles¬ cence, methods of recitation in the high school, review of elementary-school processes, review of secondary subjects for specialization in the light of the foregoing and in the interest of effective correlation of departments and sub¬ jects, and the ethics of adolescence as related to the development of the insti¬ tutional tendencies peculiar to the high-school student and American ife in general. This work would not treat the high school as an isolated part of the public-school system. This work could also presuppose much of the work now done in education as a part of the provisions for the Bachelor’s degree. This postgraduate work could then lead to the Master’s degree in education, and thus become somewhat of a professional degree for teaching, corresponding to simfiar degrees in engineering, law, etc. This is possible in view of the fact that numerous leading high schools have already established for them¬ selves the custom of giving preference to applicants who possess the Master’s degree, even on the basis of the usual academic work. 4. Practice teaching in a model high school is probably not demanded as a part of this professional training. Where possible, visitation, observation, and, perhaps, some teaching in the school where one is to be employed, could better replace the model practice." At least the widespread custom of proba- tioning new secondary teachers strongly indicates the necessity of each school fashioning its own teachers finally in accordance with its own best spirit and traditions. Into the question of professional requirements after the secondary teacher gets into service it is not meet for these suggestions to enter. Most of the foregoing suggested requirements are now practically recognized in many 628 NATIONAL EDUCATION ASSOCIATION [Secondary localities, and it is possible under existing conditions to standardize them thruout the South and the nation at large. XIV {special) CAPACITY AND LIMITATIONS OF THE NORMAL SCHOOL IN THE PROFESSIONAL PREPARATION OF HIGH-SCHOOL TEACHERS JOHN W. COOK, PRESIDENT NORTHERN ILLINOIS STATE NORMAL SCHOOL The battle for the professional preparation of teachers for the elementary- schools is substantially won. The educational people are of one mind with regard to it and the general public approves the action of its representatives in making appropriations from the state treasuries for the establishment and maintenance of normal schools. While these institutions are not limited, ordinarily, by their charters to the preparation of elementary teachers, at least not in this country, the extreme demand for teachers of that class has fur¬ nished such a practical limitation in the great majority of cases. Here and there, however, a normal school has been influenced by college traditions and has developed so strongly on the academic side that many of its graduates have become teachers in secondary schools. The marked advantages that have come to the elementary schools thru the professional training of their teachers has awakened a warm interest along similar lines among the high-school people. This is the most logical of con¬ sequences, and the practical question that is now up for discussion with them is with respect to the instrumentalities that should be employed in the technical preparation of teachers for their schools. Certain of the normal-school prin¬ cipals believe that their institutions are admirably equipped for such service and submit a statement of what they have been doing in that direction for some time in proof of the wisdom of their contention. Others hold that the needs of the two classes of teachers are so divergent that it is unwise for the normal schools to attempt to cover both fields. In attempting to discuss this question I have the possible disadvantage of being connected with a school which has no particular ambition in the way of preparing secondary teachers. In our study of the question it will be well to set the demands of the two classes of school as near each other as possible and thus to determine by such a juxta¬ position the degree of variation and its bearing upon the problem. I. GENERAL SCHOLARSHIP Instruction is one of the necessary functions of the teacher. It may be defined as the canceling of the inequality in knowledge that exists between the teacher and the pupil. The inequality, therefore, is presupposed. Nothing more certainly and more quickly undermines the respect which the pupil should feel for his teacher than the suspicion that he is not a respectable authority in the subjects in which he attempts instruction. As Rosenkranz aptly re¬ marks: “His authority over his pupil consists only in his knowledge and Department] THE NORMAL SCHOOL FOR HIGH-SCHOOL TEACHERS 629 ability. If he has not these, no external support, no trick of false appearances which he may put on, will serve to create it for him.” He richly merits the contempt which his presumption and dishonesty will inevitably provoke. A wide gap in knowledge between the teacher and the pupil is demanded, not alone in the interests of accurate and inspiring instruction, but, as well, by all of the ethical relations of the school. The immediate demands for knowledge in the two classes of schools under discussion are widely variant. The curriculum of the elementary school is, of necessity, narrow and superficial when compared with that of the high school. The first four years are mainly confined to the acquisition of a fair degree of mastery over the tools of culture. In the last half of the course there is an ascent into the elements of the knowledges, but, usually, the grammar school leaves off where the high school begins. It goes without saying that, other things being equal, the broader and more thoro the scholarship the better the teacher, regardless of the grade in which he is employed. The imagination fondly dwells upon what would be possible if in every school there were a liberally educated teacher. That is an inspiring ideal to nourish as we press on to better things, but its realization is entirely out of the question at present and will be for an indefinite time to come. Where the highest welfare of human beings is concerned it is a rude shock to our fine idealism to have such material considerations as a mere lack of pecuniary resources determine matters of such supreme and far-reaching moment. They will push themselves into prominence, however, and will de¬ termine in large measure the course of events, whether agreeable to our ideas or otherwise. With regard to the matter of general scholarship it may be said that gradu¬ ation from a high school having a good four-year course implies an academic preparation which answers the needs of the elementary school very well. It furnishes, also, a good basis for the normal school to build upon in the pro¬ fessional training of teachers for that grade. If such a condition were the rule there would be a radical improvement in the educational status of the Middle West. The superintendent of public instruction of the State of Illinois, in his latest report, 1903-04, furnishes the interesting information that there were teaching in 1904, in seventy-two counties of the state, 4,428 persons whose training had been acquired wholly in the elementary schools. Such condi¬ tions seem deplorable enough, yet their case would be paralleled by teachers in secondary schools who have had only high-school training. If the contention for a good high-school course as an academic preparation for the elementary teacher be justified, a college or university course, or its equivalent, would seem to be demanded by the same logic as a foundation for the high-school teacher. This is not unreasonable and is rapidly becoming the rule. Because of the relatively small number of high schools the scholar¬ ship problem for their teachers is not a very grave one; at least it is far less difficult than the corresponding problem for the elementary schools. Indeed, 630 NATIONAL EDUCATION ASSOCIATION [Secondary the reasonableness of this higher discipline demand is so apparent that an argument in its defen^ie seems quite unnecessary. The work of the pupil should be seen in sufficient perspective to bring out its meaning or it is likely to fall into a hopeless formalism. There are certain phases of school work that are purely mechanical and that may be conducted after a fashion by any of the pupils of a given class. The Jesuit schools employed the idea advan¬ tageously as they were conditioned, but Bell and Lancaster worked it to death. Such crude attempts at educating children had some defense a century ago but they should long since have become obsolete. Unhappily they are still present, and very much in evidence, too, as is proved by the statements quoted. It ought not to be difficult to save the secondary schools a similar fate. Happily the studies are of such a character as to make it comparatively easy to detect the incompetents in scholarship, for they are quite sure to meet with early disaster in their attempts to teach what they do not know. n. SPECIAL SCHOLARSHIP The advantages arising from an intensive study of subjects, in the interests of departmental instruction, are so apparent that many of the elementary schools have adopted that method of teaching. In consequence, children of ten or twelve, or even of tenderer years, march from room to room like young collegians, to receive the instruction of teachers who are specializing, whether they are specialists or not. They are thus anticipating the experiences of the high.school and college. It is quite possible that our sympathies for the orphaned neophytes maybe misplaced, but there can be no doubt of the wisdom of applying the method in the high school. I am not disposed to object to its application in the upper grades to a limited extent, but the amount of special¬ izing in the elementary schools will not be great for some time to come. We have come to expect the teachers of manual training, of music, of domestic economy, and possibly of drawing, to be specialists. For the ordinary branches, however, one teacher of real ability has many advantages over a group of specializers. The children need continuity of control and a warm and intimate relation to one person. There may be something in the remark of a little girl who had been a pupil in a normal training-school and was transferred to'a city school under a single teacher. She was “tired to death by seeing the same teacher in the same dress all day long.” But she must be classed among the exceptions. The subjects of instruction are within the reach of fair scholar¬ ship. The lessons are neither long nor difficult. Where specialization is demanded it is of a simple sort and yet ample in its extent and thoroness for all of the needs of the elementary school. With the secondary school the case is quite different. It has become in reality what it has sometimes been called, the people’s college. With its modern equipment of library and laboratories and shop and kitchen and sewing-rooms and business department and all of the rest, and with its extended course of literary work beside, it has outrun the old-fashioned college of fifty Department] THE NORMAL SCHOOL FOR HIGH-SCHOOL TEACHERS 631 years ago in many directions. While the transition from the eighth grade is a trifle abrupt, perhaps, and the freshman year may be a little bewildering, the pupil is well established by the beginning of the second year and is soon doing a kind of work that a teacher cannot handle satisfactorily without more than the ordinary general training that the college does. Ancient and modern languages, mathematics, literature, science, and others of the high-school subjects call for teachers who have done a good degree of special intensive work. This is also the view of most of the high-school people who are con¬ ducting really superior schools either as preparatory to the university or as a training for life. I know that the young doctors of philosophy quite often make a sorry mess of their teaching, carrying the methods of the university into the high school; but that is because of their lack of training in teaching, a discipline which many of them regard with lofty disdain. Their scholarship is an extremely desirable qualification and when they have learned to use it advantageously they will be a great blessing to their pupils. The high-school boys and girls need the vitalizing contact with genuine scholars and they will never be more susceptible to their influence than when in the high school and within the hero-worship epoch. III. NORMAL SCHOOLS ^ Can the normal schools meet the demands of general and special scholar¬ ship which have been suggested as essential to the best success of high-school teachers ? That depends upon the character of the normal schools. Indeed, there is no normal school, but there are normal schools. In no other group of educa- * tional institutions will there be found such infinite variety. Included under the term will be found schools that are as widely separated as the Superior Normal School of Paris and some of the small private “normals” that main¬ tain a precarious existence from the fees paid them by ambitious boys and girls who want to get enough of the “common branches” to enable them to get a second-grade certificate to teach a country school. The former is in a class by itself. Perhaps the same is true of the latter. Its faculty has enrolled many of the most notable French scholars of modern times. Names like Pasteur’s adorn its cata ogues. No American normal school has approached it in the extent cf its academic curriculum. As to the ability of such an insti¬ tution to furnish general and special scholarship for teachers of high schools or of colleges there can be no doubt. A fair number of our western normal schools, anxious to compete with the colleges or even with the universities, in the extent of their courses of study offer a training in scholarship that ought to qualify their graduates, in that respect, for instruction in secondary schools. I quote from President Seerley, in the Fourth Year Book of the Society for the Scientific Study of Education, Part I, who discusses the “Relative Advantages of Universities and Normal Schools in Preparing Secondary Teachers.” He says: 632 NATIONAL EDUCATION ASSOCIATION [Secondary The record of the Iowa Normal School is cited, not because its scheme of work is ideal nor its plans perfected, but because its organization permits the training of all classes and all kinds of public-school teachers. This condition has existed for only a few years and yet its graduates have taken an active part in the work of secondary education. It is true that they are among the more successful teachers, and that their influence upon the spirit and tendencies of education is unequaled by any equivalent number of teachers who have received their training in other kinds of educational institutions. He then proceeds to show that there are nineteen high-school principals, twenty-three city superintendents, fifty-eight department teachers, ninety-one village principals, and fifty assistant principals who have received all of their preparation in that institution. Here are 241 persons, a sufficient number to generalize with regard to that particular school, “whose influence upon the spirit and tendencies of education is unequaled by any equivalent number of teachers who have received their training in other kinds of an educational institution.” It would be interesting to know just what preparation these pupils had when they entered the Iowa State Normal School, how long they remained there, and what courses they pursued, to what degree they specialized in the branches which they are teaching. Possibly President Jones, of Ypsilanti, and President Kirk, of Kirksville, may have similar statements to offer, for their schools give advanced instruction in high-school subjects. I may add in support of the general proposition implied in President Seerley’s statemient, that some of the best high-school teachers of my acquaintance and some of the l)est city superintendents in this country received all of their school training above the elementary grade in the Illinois State Normal University, at Normal. The former have been teaching in the same schools for many years and have developed their work by their private study, while t' e latter owe rather more to their experience, I suspect, than to the school. This widening of the academic instruction of the normal school is by no means a modern innovation. It is rather the original conception of the ideal method of training teachers. Such a system was in operation in New York when the first American normal school was established, at Lexington. The discussion between the advocates of the two systems—an independent normal school, on one hand, and a normal department as an attachment to an academy, on the other—was protracted and intense. It is an instructive chapter in the history of American normal schools. It was finally decided, in Massachusetts, to adopt the former plan and normal schools generally, in this country, have followed the Lexington leadership, not excepting the New York schools. Where there has been but one normal school in a state there seems to have been a stronger disposition to accent the academic aspects than where there are more. What objection can there be to such an organization of the normal school ? That fine things have been done by schools having such an organization must be admitted in the presence of testimony that is so convincing. It is assumed in this discussion that the primary purpose of such an institution is the pro- Department] THE NORMAL SCHOOL FOR HIGH-SCHOOL TEACHERS 633 fessional preparation of teachers, as the primary purpose of a law school is not general culture but the professional preparation of lawyers. I suspect that this proposition will be admitted by all normal-school faculties. The divergence will come when the method of preparation is up for discussion. If this is a correct view of the function of the normal school the constant and insistent preoccupation of everyone connected with the management of the institution will not be general or special scholarship of an academic sort, but will be special scholarship relating to the teaching art. Anything, then, that tends to minimize the main interest of the school, or what should be its main interest, must be regarded as hostile to the fundamental purpose of the insti¬ tution. Where there is a strong accentuation of the academic idea and a rich development of it at the expense of the professional idea it ought not to call itself a normal school, but an academy or college with a pedagogical annex. I do not forget that I shall be accused of thinking more of an equipment of method than of an equipment of subject-matter to which to apply it. Such an accusation would be unjust. I have no faith in pure form; indeed, such a conception is beyond my capacity. I assume as thorogoing scholarship upon which to found the pedagogical instruction as any advocate of the “academic” normal school. I plead for the time which ought to have been spent in other schools of a different character and that should be presupposed, in order that it may be spent in a sincere and rigorous study of the science and art of education. The simple truth is that it is far easier to run along the old lines, long since marked out by the colleges, than it is to develop a satisfactory course for teach¬ ers. Because such courses are yet in the formative state and require the most persistent effort and the most laborious investigation, if they are to be of real worth, there is no little scepticism, even in some of the normal schools, as to their making much of a demand upon the intelligence of the students. I quote from one of the most eminent of the advocates of the academic scholar¬ ship idea, a man whose success is the strongest argument for his view; “If the students getting ready for a teacher’s career get nothing from a normal school except professional instruction and technical training, it is quite certain that a majority of them would mentally perish from the monotony of the effort, and would find it necessary to decline to continue such unpalatable work.” This seems a strange utterance for a normal-school president and implies that, in his opinion, pedagogy has not developed enough in the way of a fruitful content to become the predominating subject of instruction in a technical school. It seems to me to be more than probable that the strictly professional aspects of training will be neglected in an institution that engages largely in the pursuit of the knowledges for their own sake. The great majority of the teachers in such schools will devote themselves to their mathematics and literature and science and the rest and, in consequence, the pedagogy will 634 NATIONAL EDUCATION ASSOCIATION [Secondary get scant attention. On the other hand, if the school is really absorbed in what would seem to be the characteristic function of a genuine normal school there would not be space nor inclination to furnish the general and special scholarship in the knowledges that must be presupposed in any good scheme of professional instruction. My conclusion, therefore, is that the normal school is not well adapted to the work of the college, and to the extent that it attempts it there will be a falling-off in the quality of the work along profes¬ sional lines which it was especially organized to do if it was sincere in the selection of its name. There will not be that unity of sentiment, that enthusi¬ astic devotion to the study of childhood, that open-mindedness with regard to the course of study, that willingness and desire to submit the methods of the classroom to the test df the most rigorous criticism in the light that has been thrown upon teaching by the sciences that relate to the correlated life of body and mind, that ought to be found in a teacher’s seminary. IV. TRAINING FOR SECONDARY VS. ELEMENTARY TEACHERS Can the normal schools having the ordinary organization give satisfactory professional training to secondary as well as to elementary teachers ? It is quite generally conceded, at last, that the normal schools are doing a fair piece of work in the preparation of elementary teachers. If it is really possible for them to do as well for secondary teachers the agencies are at hand for the solution of a problem that is pressing with growing urgency upon the minds of the educational people whose chief interests lie in the secondary schools. That the training that elementary teachers now receive would be of great value to secondary teachers I do not for a moment doubt. The high school pre¬ supposes the elementary school, hence it presupposes the first twelve or fifteen years of the life of the child. To have a fairly accurate conception of what has been going on in these wonderful years is to have a most admirable prepara¬ tion for the high-school period. Many of the colleges and universities have been so favorably impressed with the work of the state normal schools that they are willing to admit to their junior classes such of the graduates of their two-year courses as were ready for the university when they entered the normal school. With suitable work in the higher institutions, in the way of liberalizing their scholarship, such persons become admirable teachers for secondary schools. Their professional training identifies them very thoroly with the teaching idea. Their disciplines in the university redeem them from the narrowness of a limited grasp of the higher development of the knowl¬ edges, and stimulate them in a most interesting way along the lines of superior scholarship. No students are more enthusiastic and few are so ambitious for professional scholarship with all that it implies in the way of general and special scholarship in the knowledges. Of course they have much to learn about the high-school boy and girl and of the educational values of the sec¬ ondary curriculum. But they are extremely desirable, as a general proposi- Department] THE NORMAL SCHOOL FOR HIGH-SCHOOL TEACHERS 635 tion. Large numbers of them are extending their courses of study in this way and are doing fine things, in consequence, for the high schools. Their university work is done with the thought of teaching running thru it all, and they thus have the advantage of assimilating and estimating notions. Their training and experience along professional lines give them the apperceiving conceptions by which thgy can make the most of their new disciplines. Where they are willing to do more postgraduate work in the teachers’ colleges they become quite ideal and indicate to us what is really meant by a professional teacher. That the normal schools must prepare elementary teachers is, I think, universally conceded. If they should not do this they ought to surrender their charters and reorganize as teachers’ colleges. Now the thing of all things that is fundamentally necessary to the grade teacher is the warmest sympathy with child life and the clearest understanding of the best methods of its motivation. She must make up her mind to live with childhood. She must shorten her step to its slow intellectual pace. She must content herself in her school work with the simplicities of elementary knowledge, so far as her teaching is concerned. She cannot hope to have her recitations filled with the intellectual delights that come to the teachers in the secondary and superior schools. The demands made upon her are peculiarly exhausting, since alertness, vivacity, constant watchfulness, genuine mothering, are the price of any success with young children. Real comradeship with them, in any reciprocal sense, is hardly possible. Because of these trying conditions the normal school must be suffused, surcharged, saturated, with interest in the young child. In a very true sense he is clay in the hands of the potter. An unsuitable position for a considerable portion of each day may mean curvature of the spine, with all of its attendant penalties. A neglect to attend properly to the quantity and disposition of light may result in defective vision, with all of its embarrassing handicaps. Windows carelessly left open may entail catarrhal troubles with all of their evil and offensive consequences. Improper desks mean possible round shoulders. Everywhere there is physical plasticity, but a vanishing plasticity, leaving behind it symmetry, if the teacher is wise and watchful, or deformity, if she has been neither. In the mental life there is the same im.pressibility. It is a time of begin¬ nings and relative helplessness. Nothing is easier than a maladjustment of tasks against which the child is too ignorant to file a conscious protest. Few things are more difficult than a generous understanding of the opening life, a discovery of the employments most suitable to its successive stages, and a proper adaptation of the latter to the former. When the high-school stage arrives a radical change in the development of the pupil is at hand. New ambitions are awakened. The old routine, for which the growing child has a very hospitable place in certain periods of his unfolding, has become inexpressibly irksome. Individual initiative succeeds imitation or obedience. The social instincts are quickened. Sentimental 636 NATIONAL EDUCATION ASSOCIATION [Secondary attachments suddenly blossom out with exaggerated efflorescence. In brief, the multitudinous phenomena of adolescence, with all of their iridescent changes, appear and childhood is a thing of the past. How can a school whose main prepossessions are in the directions of childhood meet in the most satisfactory way the demands of a school whose most absorbing interests should be in the unstable* emotional, transforming epoch of the adolescent ? How can it furnish the atmosphere and the requi¬ site guidance for two such dissimilar stages of growth when each seems to demand, in the interests of the best results, the exclusion of the other ? Let us remember that we are seeking not fairly good conditions, but the best condi¬ tions. This is one of the aspects of the secondary teacher’s preparation that the normal school seems not well fitted to give. But the intellectual attitude changes quite as radically as the emotional. The teaching, or instruction, must be greatly modified in its method. It is true that in the higher grades it approaches that of the high school, but in the lower grades it is quite radically different. Imagine the primary teacher employing the Socratic irony! Yet in the high school it has a legitimate place altho not a prominent one. The young child has slight critical capacity upon which the teacher can bank. His drawings of the human form lack necks and attach the arms to the side of the head, yet they do not ofi'end his notions of accuracy. The high-school pupil needs the challenge, the cornering, the defeat, perhaps, as well as the sympathetic attitude of praise and agreement. He has found footings which give him confidence to hold his own against the contention of a teacher, perhaps. Scholarship is a possible passion and the subjects of instruction more and more absorb his mind. The studies are new and demand a new emphasis. The younger child is chiefly occupied with the individualism of the world, but the high-school pupil seeks more and more to find the unity as well of the phenomena of the world. To state it a little differently, the high-school age is the stage in which the pupil is entering upon the epoch of conscious reflection; he is beginning the more explicit identifica¬ tion of himself with the genius of the modern world, which is essentially scientific. These epochs of growth are so generally recognized that I need not follow this line of thought further than to say that the method of ob¬ servation and illustration must now give way in a growing degree to the method of demonstration in which the necessity of the relations is made apparent. It may be answered that the normal school is capable of adjusting itself to these varying conditions by organizing separate departments which shall not overlap each other. But this is only another way of saying that the two classes of schools may exist side by side under the same general management. That is true enough, but that will make a sort of university of the normal school and there will be necessitated an elaborate and distinct equipment for each. As there must be a training-school for the elementary teachers so there must be, for the highest success, a parallel opportunity for the secondary Department] THE NORMAL SCHOOL FOR HIGH-SCHOOL TEACHERS 637 teachers. I do not advocate an exact parallel, but an application of the same general principle. I must content myself with one additional suggestion. It is quite possible for the normal school to present the general features of a pedagogical phi¬ losophy. It must be very general, however, to be comprehended by all. It may be carried to higher and higher planes as the ability of the pupil renders it possible, and such a development of the subject is extremely valuable in toning up the general character of the institution. But each subject of the curriculum needs a method treatment which unfolds its inherent logic and its adaptation to the needs of the developing pupil. For illustration, arithmetic must be studied from a new point of view. The normal student had his last contact with it in the grades of the grammar school while on his way to the high school. He was then too young to be conscious of his own generalizations or to rise to any just conception of the unifying ideas that make it a science. The subject must be re-examined from the standpoint of its logical organization so that the student can look down upon it as it emerges in all of its seeming complexity from a few very simple principles. This is what is meant by the normal- school people when they declare that their work upon the subjects of the course of study is not academic but professional. What has been said with respect to arithmetic is to be considered as said with regard to the other subjects of the elementary school. But the subjects of the secondary school need a similar treatment and such a suggestion implies an academic preparation that a college course will barely cover. If we are to have really superior teachers for the secondary schools we must not be satisfied with anything short of what Germany is doing for her schools of that grade. It is absurd to expect our existing normal schools to accomplish any such results. Meanwhile, these institutions are the only existing agencies, except the teach¬ ers’ colleges and pedagogical departments of the universities, that can afford any great relief at present. The latter are so few in number that they can accommodate very few relatively. The former are fewer still but they are having a profound influence. Until the present ferment shall have aroused the public mind to the necessity of making the secondary schools as attractive pecuniarily as the colleges—and why should they not be ?—men and women of superior ability and preparation will not select them for life-work except in occasional instances where principalships pay a living wage. A few miles from where I am now writing is a township high school. Its principal is a graduate of the Illinois State Normal University and of an excellent Ohio college. He is a professional teacher in all that the name implies, and the community regards him as a good bargain at something like thirty-five hun¬ dred dollars a year. He took his professional course before his college course, but he served a long apprenticeship as an assistant before he rose to the dignity of principal. He is a good illustration of what I have had before my mind as I have written of the secondary teacher and of his preparation, altho there should be an educational institution which could do for him in two or 638 NATIONAL EDUCATION ASSOCIATION [Secondary three years what he did for himself in several times two or three years while he held a subordinate position. I have made an incidental reference to the practice school as a feature of the institution that will prepare secondary teachers. Doubtless the work of the normal student in actual teaching under normal conditions, altho done in the elementary grades, will be of material help in high schools. There should be an opportunity to study a model high school and also to do actual teaching work as a part of the preparation of the secondary teachers, however. The problem is far more difficult than in the elementary school because of the greater maturity of the pupils and of their more fully developed consciousness of the work of their teachers. It can be done and well done if deferred until the scholarship and maturity of the teacher are of such a quality as to win the confidence of the pupils. What is at first lacking in skill can be compensated for by a fine culture and attractive personal qualities. Persons of such attain¬ ments understand the meaning of criticism and accomplish in a few weeks under such conditions what would otherwise cost months or even years of experience, if they were ever able to achieve it at all. I have not dared to discuss those other very desirable qualities-of the sec¬ ondary teacher which are matters of individual personality rather than the result of professional training. My conclusion as the result of my experience and study is that the normal school as generally organized at present is not the best possible agency for the ■preparation of secondary teachers. XV {special) PROFESSIONAL TRAINING OF TEACHERS FOR THE SECONDARY SCHOOLS OF GERMANY CHARLES DEGARMO, PROFESSOR OF THE SCIENCE AND ART OF EDUCATION, CORNELL UNIVERSITY CONDITIONS OF ADMISSION TO EXAMINATIONS The so-called secondary schools of Germany cover a period of nine years in the educational life of the student; roughly from nine or ten to eighteen or nineteen years of age. The first three years of this course may be said to belong to elementary, the next four years to secondary, and the last two years to higher education. To be trained for such a school, the candidate needs the professional preparation of the elementary, the high-school, and the college teacher. To meet such conditions the Germans divide their certifi¬ cates in the various subjects into first and second and third grades, the scope of which will be explained later. It takes some sixty closely-printed pages to describe all the requirements for the granting of these certificates in Prussia alone. Many of them relate to social, economic, and educational conditions which find no counterpart among us. For this reason, the statement of what is required in the German Department] SECONDARY SCHOOLS OF GERMANY 639 professional preparation of teachers for this class of schools may be greatly abridged. One of the fixed ideas in Germany is that the candidate for teaching in the higher schools must first be brought to the stage of productive scholarship. Two antecedent conditions are therefore prescribed for eligibility for the later professional examinations. They are as follows: 1. Graduation from the full course of a Gymnasium^ a Real gymnasium or an Oberrealschule, each of which is nine years long, and admits to the university. 2. Evidence that the subjects in which the candidate wishes to qualify have been studied in an orderly manner for at least three years in a university. When these and a few other minor conditions are satisfactorily met the candidate is admitted to the examinations for certification. THE EXAMINATION COMMISSIONS These commissions are composed mostly of university professors, together with a few secondary school men, all of whom are named by the minister of education and serve for one year. In general, there is a commission in each university town, there being ten of these bodies in Prussia. The candidate is required to present himself before either the commission located where he spent his last semester of university residence, he having already completed one other term there, or the commission in the district where he proposes to teach. Provision is made to prevent too many candidates from being admitted in any one district by transferring their applications to other commissions, and also for the reception of candidates coming from other German states or foreign countries. SCOPE AND CHARACTER OF THE EXAMINATIONS The examination consists of two parts, one general and one special. The general subjects are philosophy, pedagogy, and German literature; also for those who expect to teach religion, the doctrines of the Evangelical or of the Catholic church. The special examination is upon the subjects the candidate expects to teach, which are to be divided into majors and minors, examination in at least four being required. The subjects chosen must be taken in the following combinations: Latin and Greek; French and English; history and geography; religion and Hebrew; pure mathematics and physics; chemistry with mineralogy and physics; or, instead of physics, botany and zoology, with the understanding that German may take the place of either of the subjects in the first three groups or of Hebrew in the fourth. Applied mathematics is also a subject for examination, to be preceded, however, by pure mathematics. The minimum requisite for any kind of a certificate is that the candidate shall be satisfactory in the general examination, and shall obtain first rank in at least one subject and second rank in at least two of the others. 640 NATIONAL EDUCATION ASSOCIATION [Secondary First rank in any subject entitles the holder to teach it thruout the nine grades of the school. The holder of a certificate of second rank in any subject is entitled to teach that subject only thru the first six grades, that is, up to and including unter secunda. It is in general expected that the candidate will select at least two majors and two minors. He may, however, select more of either or both, supple¬ mentary examinations being subsequently allowed in order to enable him to extend the range of subjects he is certificated to teach. Dean Russell states that few teachers ever secure first rank for more than three subjects. Both the general and the special examinations are partly written and partly oral. The written work, however, is quite unlike the sort we are accustomed to in this country, for it is prepared at home in the form of essays with full liberty to use books to any extent desired. Only personal assistance is forbidden. One essay is upon some theme in philosophy or education; other essays are upon themes selected from the candidate’s major subjects. Six weeks are allowed for each essay, with a possible extension of the time to six weeks more. In this written work the design is to test the sufficiency of the applicant’s knowledge, the adequacy of his judgment, and to show whether or not he is capable of a logically arranged, clearly and adequately expressed exposition of the subject in hand. In the oral examination upon the general subjects, the following points are to be established: 1. In religion, whether or not the candidate shows himself well acquainted with the content and connection of Holy Writ, has a general knowledge of the history of the Christian church, and knows the chief doctrines of its confession. 2. Whether or not in philosophy he is acquainted with the important facts of its history, with the important doctrines of logic and psychology; and also whether he has read one of the more important philosophical masterpieces with comprehension, such as Locke’s Essay Concerning Human Understand¬ ing, Berkeley’s Principles oj Human Knowledge, Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason, or Schopenhauer’s Die Welt als Wille und Vorstellung. 3. In pedagogy, whether or not he has grasped its philosophical basis, knows the important stages of its historical development since the sixteenth century, and possesses some understanding of the problems of his future calling. 4. In German literature, the examination is to show whether or not he is acquainted with its general development, especially since the beginning of its springtime in the eighteenth century, and that since leaving school he has read with understanding its more important works. Needless to say, the oral examinations in the subject-matter to be taught are the most searching and thorogoing of all. The candidate need not expect that the examiners will not sound all the depths and shallows of his knowledge. Department] SECONDARY SCHOOLS OF GERMANY 641 An idea of the range of the examination may be gained by the prescriptions for those who would teach English. As a preliminary the candidate must show that he has a good elementary knowledge of Latin and can correctly translate the easier writers, like Caesar, at sight. Then come the regular requirements, as follows: 1. For the second grade: Knowledge of the elements of phonetics, correct and ready pronunciation; acquaintance with the etymology and syntax of the grammar; possession of a sufficient vocabulary of words and phrases and con¬ siderable practice in the use of the speech; outline of the course of develop¬ ment of English literature since Shakspere and reading knowledge of the important poetic and prose writings of recent times; capacity for facile trans¬ lation of well-known authors into German, and the power to compose in English without gross errors. 2. For the first grade: Oral and \vritten use of the language, not only with the grammatical accuracy arising from scientific grounding in the gram¬ mar, but also with more extensive acquaintance with the vocabulary and idioms, as well as a capacity to use them with a facility adequate to the demands of instruction; general knowledge of the historical development of the lan¬ guage from the old English period; knowledge of the development of the literature united with a thoro reading of a number of eminent writings from the earlier periods to the present; insight into the laws of English versifica¬ tion, both in early and in late periods; acquaintance with the history of England, as well as with the proper exposition of texts in use in schools. It is remarked that an especially excellent knowledge of modern English literature or an unusual mastery of the tongue as now used, may be accepted in lieu of corresponding deficiencies in any of the foregoing requirements. Should a successful candidate receive third grade in any subject, he is permitted to teach this subject only in the first three grades of the school, i. e., in the elementary classes. The final certificate covering the various subjects is ranked according to the number of first-, second-, or third-grade ratings received. . A first-rank certificate means that the holder has received upon examination either two majors of first grade and two minors of second grade, or two majors and one minor of first grade, and it entitles him to future appointment to the position of head teacher, with the title of professor. A second-rank certificate means that the holder has not reached the minimum above described, and that he will be restricted to the position of ordinary teacher {Oberlehrer). (See Russell, Gerinan Higher Education, PP- 352-369-) Arrangement is made for various supplementary examinations to make up deficiencies. It requires at least a year after leaving the university to prepare for and pass these various written and oral examinations. 642 NATIONAL EDUCATION ASSOCIATION [Secondary THE SEMINARY WORK After all examinations are out of the way, the candidate is required to pass one year in so-called seminary training, either at one of the twelve state semi¬ naries for this purpose, or at some one of those established at Gymnasiums and Real gymnasiums by the rescript of 1890. From three to seven candidates successful in the examinations constitute the students in a given seminary for the year. They are under the charge of the director and one or two of his ablest teachers. The aim is to make the candidate thoroly acquainted with the work of the school with which the seminary is connected, and to give him opportunity to do some trial teaching under the guidance and criticism of the director and his chosen assistants. The first quarter-year is spent in obser¬ vation in all classes and in all subjects. During the second quarter he makes his first attempts at teaching according to the directions of the leaders in charge. From these beginnings he gradually enlarges his teaching-sphere until he gives lessons during the whole hour, and often for a succession of hours, but always under the inspection of one of the regular teachers. The candidates are also intrusted with the examination of written work of the various classes. The instruction in any given subject closes with a sample lesson, at which the other candidates, the director, and the other teachers are present. Following this lesson at a suitable time there is a critical discussion of its merits and defects. At least two hours a week must be devoted to a session with the candidates, usually led by the, director. There is much latitude allowed as to the choice and treatment of subjects at these sessions. Formal reports are relieved by informal discussions. Toward the close of the year the candidate hands in a somewhat extensive essay upon some concrete pedagogical or didactic problem assigned by the director. At the end of the year the director sends to the provincial school board an elaborate report of the year’s work. Upon the basis of this report, together with the results of previous examinations, the board admits the candidate to his final test, the year of cadet teaching in some Gymnasium to which he shall be assigned. This is called the Probejahr. THE YEAR OF CADET TEACHING Das Probejahr For the year of trial teaching the candidates are assigned in pairs to the various Gymnasiums or Oberrealschulen, when they teach from eight to ten hours per week under the guidance of older teachers. They must do a certain amount of supervision, attend faculty meetings and identify themselves in every way with the life of the school. Up to the end of this year they have received no pay whatever, but if their record is approved at the end of the trial year, their names are enrolled on the list of teachers eligible to appointment in the higher schools of the province. When so appointed they are teachers and state officers for life, assured that Department] SECONDARY SCHOOLS OF GERMANY 643 with reasonable diligence they will have employment so long as they are able to work and then—a pension for the remainder of their lives. COMMENTS That all teachers in German secondary schools are men is a well-known fact. It may well cause astonishment in the United States where the number of men teachers not only shows no proportional increase, but suffers rather an absolute annual decrease, that any country can by any possibility induce enough men of approved quality to meet conditions so strenuous as to knowl¬ edge and professional training. The minimum is as follows: three years in the primary schools, nine in the Gymnasium, three in the university, one in examinations, one in the seminary, and one in trial teaching—eighteen years in all, not to speak of the one year of military training exacted of all able-bodied young men. Yet the seminary year was added in 1890, not so much that there might be more training, as that there might be fewer candidates. To understand a situation like this, one must bear several facts in mind. In the first place, the secondary schools are not democratic in our sense of the term, for the common schools, in which nine-tenths of the children of Germany are found, do not open into them at all. The Gymnasiums and hence the universities exist therefore not for the people as a whole, but for the education to those who form the professional and official classes. As a rule, it does not occur to a German university graduate that he might go into indus¬ trial life, and even if the idea did occur to him, it would soon be dismissed, for his training has been professional and leaves him unfitted for success in any other field. Broadly speaking, there is nothing for the German university graduate to do except to practice the profession for which he has been trained. If this chances to be teaching, a teacher he must be—or nothing. If now it should be the case that candidates for the professions, teaching included, should increase faster than the population increases, it may easily be seen that what Bismarck called an educated proletariat would be formed. That is, a class of men who have their skill and nothing else to offer, and who might, indeed, become Hungercandidaten. ^ What are the facts? In the period from 1851 to 1861 the number of students in the German universities was 335 to each million inhabitants. This ratio remained substantially unaltered until 1871. From 1871 to 1876 the number rose to 386. From this time on, the development has been rapid. By the end of the year 1880 the number of students had risen from 13,029 in 1836 to 28,861. By the end of 1890 the number had risen to 32,756, and by 1905 had reached a total of 42,435, or over 705 per million inhabitants. This means that during the last thirty years the attendance at the universities has grown twice as fast as the population, and that consequently the demand for places in civil offices, in law, medicine, theology, and teaching has enormously increased. There are in general two applicants for every place, and, further- 644 NATIONAL EDUCATION ASSOCIATION [Secondary more, a class of applicants who must have the kind of places they have been prepared for, since they are unfitted for anything else. In American universities at present it is difficult to get good men to con¬ sider teaching as a career, the transition to industrial life being so easy and its prospective monetary rewards so attractive. That we could successfully impose the German conditions for entrance upon the work of high-school teaching is not to be imagined. Few men would apply, and the public would revolt in the case of women. Furthermore, we have no means for carrying out any general system of cadet teaching, since local autonomy would place this matter at the individual disposition of the various school boards. It remains to be seen whether we could not by some system of benefits to individual and community induce high schools to undertake this much needed work. Candidates would serve for little or no salary, if only they were assured of a reasonable expectation of employment at the close of their cadetship, while school boards would consent to this arrangement if it were evident that on the whole the schools and the community would thereby be educationally benefitted. XVI {special) THE PRESENT TRAINING OF TEACHERS FOR SECONDARY SCHOOLS .EDWIN G. DEXTER, PROFESSOR OF EDUCATION, UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS The task assigned to me in the preparation of this general report is one with easily defined limits. It is a study of fact pure and simple, entirely free from speculation with intent to discover the facilities for pedagogical instruc¬ tion within the colleges and universities of our country. If we are to accept the rapidly growing feeling that these are the only educational institutions adequately equipped in their academic and scientific departments for the preparation of teachers for secondary schools, the study is one of the profes¬ sional preparation of these teachers. The sources of information are threefold: 1. Recent reports of the United States Commissioner of Education. 2. College and university catalogs as well as special reports of all sorts from those institutions. 3. A considerable mass of correspondence with various college officers, mostly pro¬ fessors of education. I From the study of the first of these sources of information it was found that 219 colleges and universities reported {Rep., 1904) students enrolled in courses in pedagogy. The merest inspection of the list convinces one of its inexactness since several having successful departments of education are not included. Such institutions are, however, included within the study. On the other hand, a careful study of the catalogs of the institutions named in the commissioner’s report discloses the fact that 21 of the number make no mention Department] 645 TEACHERS FOR SECONDARY SCHOOLS --- of any pedagogical offerings. An attempt was made, thru correspondence when necessary", to secure the catalogs of all the 219 institutions mentioned, tho without success in 50 instances. Of the 169 institutions whose catalogs were studied a limited number (16) offered so-called “teachers’ courses” in specific subjects, as Latin, English, or mathematics, w’hich were plainly but rapid reviews, useful as “cramming” courses for teachers’ examinations; but since no offerings were made along strictly pedagogical lines, these were omitted from the study. A few institu¬ tions mentioned by the Commissioner are special schools for the deaf or blind and were excluded as plainly beyond the scope of this paper. With such substraction and with the addition of institutions known to offer courses in pedagogy, but not mentioned in the list, we have as the basis of this report 148 colleges and universities of widely varying educational merit and elaboration of organization. A considerable number of these institutions, altho classed by the Com¬ missioner as “higher,” offer academic and scientific courses scarcely higher in grade than those of the sophomore year of the better universities and per¬ haps theoretically should be excluded from this study. Practically, however, they must be included since they are the sources of supply for the teaching force of the secondary schools tributary to them. In the statistical study of these institutions immediately following, made for the purpose of showing in a general way the facilities for pedagogical instruc¬ tion, the following facts are presented: 1. Number of instructors of professional rank offering pedagogical courses. 2. Number of instructors of lesser rank offering such courses. 3. Number of instructors of both these classes who are also officially connected wdth other departments of instruction. 4. Total number of pedagogical courses offered. 5. A rough classification of such courses, (a) Courses in educational philosophy. (&) History of education, (c) Administration and method, (d) Educational psychology (where these courses are not offered in the department of education or pedagogy but by a separate psychological faculty they are not included), {e) Observation and practice teaching. (/) Seminars, {g) School hygiene, (h) School law. By the term “course” is meant the offering of a single subject for one term. For the purpose of this study it was deemed inadvisable to take into consideration, either the varying lengths of courses (usually either two or three to the college year) or the varying number of exercises per week. To have done so would, in some ways, have increased its value but only at the cost of very greatly increased complication. The question of classification of subjects under a reasonable number of heads was not an easy one to settle. More than one hundred different statements of courses were found. Whether the classification I have used is the best possible I should not wish to say. I am, however, stating it with sufficient detail to make it ful y understood: 646 NATIONAL EDUCATION ASSOCIATION [Secondary Class A: All courses of a general philosophical nature. These are frequently under the title “Philosophy of Education.” Courses entitled “Principles of Education” are also included when from the description it is plain that the emphasis is on the philosophical side; “Educational Classics” when the emphasis is not on the historical side. Courses in the philosophy of particular educators, as Herbart, Rousseau, Froebel, etc. Class B; All general courses in the history of education. All special studies of the schools of particular periods or countries except those in present organization and methods. Educational classics when the emphasis is historical. Class C: A very wide range of courses is covered by this group. Roughly, they may be divided into two divisions: (i) courses in organization and administration; (2) courses in methods of teaching, either general or in the teaching of particular subjects. Under the first division are the following: School organization, general pedagogy (not theoretical), school administration, the present organization of foreign school systems, etc. Under the second division comes general method and all courses in the teaching of special subjects, as Latin, mathematics, etc. These courses are frequently offered by instructors in other departments than that of education. Class D: No courses in psychology were included which had not plainly a pedagogical application. Among those covered are the following: Educational psychology, genetic psychology, child-study. Class E: These courses are fully discussed later in this report. Class F: This group of courses were plainly for advanced students. Educational philosophy, history, and administration are included tho the latter predominates. The titles of the other two divisions are sufficiently expressive and need no explanation. In the tabulation of data everything is excluded which applies specifically to the work of the elementary schools. Wdiatever applies to school in general or to secondary schools is retained. The University of Chicago and Columbia University offer many courses in elementary-school training, and many of the smaller colleges offer some work that must be excluded for the same reason. Such subjects as manual training, music, drawing, household science, physical education are not included because adequate data are obtainable from very few institutions. The facts disclosed by the study of the 148 colleges and universities are as follows: Within them 357 different instructors offer courses of a pedagogical character. Of that number of instructors 278 are of professional rank. That so large a number are of this rank is due to the fact that within the smaller institutions, w^hich predominate in the list, there are but comparatively few officers of a lower grade. Of the entire number of instructors (357) 278 are officially connected with other departments in which they also give instruction. This fact is also largely due to conditions in the smaller institutions in which the pedagogical instruction is frequently given by the professor of philosophy. The custom too, even in the larger institutions, of having the courses in special methods given by instructors in the academic and scientific departments, is of influence here. The total number of courses of the nature covered by the classification already given was found to be 935. The classification of these coursds is as follows: Department] TEACHERS FOR SECONDARY SCHOOLS 647 Schools Courses Per Cent, of Total Number of Courses Class A (philosophical) 37 74 8 Class B (historical) 123 196 21.2 Class C (organization and method) 148 469 50-7 Class D (psychological) 47 93 9-8 Class E (observation and practice) Class F (seminars) in 36 schools. 27 70 7.6 Class G (school hygiene) 15 20 2.2 Class H (school law) 13 13 1.4 The exact nature of the work done in the particular subjects covered by this classification it is not easy to determine, either by the printed catalogs or correspondence. In the smaller institutions it is almost entirely thru the use of the textbook, and in the larger ones mainly so. In the former the single course offered is usually designated as “pedagogy” or “school manage¬ ment.” The number of institutions offering courses in class A is largely augmented by a requirement of the Kansas law to the effect that all candi¬ dates for the teacher’s certificate must be proficient in the philosophy of educa¬ tion. That being the case, all of the colleges of the state offer that subject. For class E (observation and practice) it was impossible to determine even the number of courses offered since the work is so often done in connection with other definite offerings. The following institutions, however, profess to offer some facilities for the work. Just what is done in some of these institutions is shown later in ihis report. Berea College Brown University Bethany College (Kan.) University of Colorado Columbia University University of Chicago Cornell College Drake University Fisk University Howard University University of Idaho University of Illinois Iowa Wesleyan University Knox CoUege Kentucky State College University of Missouri University of Nebraska University of Nashville University of Nevada Ohio State University University of Rochester Roger Williams Universitv Syracuse University Throop Polytechnic Institute Union College (Neb.) University of Utah University of Washington University of Wisconsin West Virginia University Western Reserve University New York University Dartmouth College Harvard University Nebraska Wesleyan University The following table shows with some detail the conditions of pedagogical instruction for a selected list of colleges and universities taken from the larger list of 148. Only those institutions were included for which conditions could be fairly well determined. Any inaccuracies may be ascribed to the difficulty of classifying the offerings. 648 NATIONAL EDUCATION ASSOCIATION [Secondary TABLE I Schools Total Number Instructors in Education Professors Instructors, Assistant and Associate Professors No. of Professors Who Offer Courses in Other Dep’ts Total Number of Courses Offered Philosophy of Education History of Education Administration Method, Management, Pedagogy Educational Psychology, Child-Study Seminars in Education School Hygiene School Law Observation and Practice Elementary Schools, Manu¬ al Training Harvard University. 2 I I 6 I 2 3 yes University of Illinois. 19 13 6 16 35 2 4 21 , , 6 I I yes 6 University of Michigan. 14 14 • . II 23 3 2 15 I 2 , , , , • . University of Missouri. II 8 3 9 26 6 17 3 , , yes 8 University of Iowa. 6 3 3 2 19 2 4 8 I 4 no , , New York University. 5 . , 12 I 2 5 2 2 , , , , 4 University of Chicago. 21 9 12 18 48 4 7 27 5 3 2 yes 42 Columbia University. 24 20 4 17 92 7 8 55 8 12 2 yes 44 University of Washington. I I • . . , 7 I I 4 I yes University of Nebraska. 12 6 6 9 29 2 4 15 4 3 I yes 7 University of California. II 3 8 8 28 I 6 13 4 3 I yes I University of Colorado. 4 3 I , . 10 , , 2 5 I 2 , , no , , Leland Stanford Jr. Univ. 9 3 6 6 16 I 2 10 2 I yes University of Rochester. 2 2 2 2 I I ves Dartmouth College. 2 I I 2 3 • . I I I yes , , University of Wisconsin. 6 3 3 5 14 2 3 5 3 I yes 4 Indiana University. 3 3 , , 3 6 , , I 3 I I no Ohio State University. 7 5 2 5 16 3 8 2 I no West Virginia University. 8 4 I . . 15 I 4 4 I 5 yes University of Texas. 4 2 2 I 10 I I 4 3 I no Brown University. I I , , , , IS , , 2 8 I 3 I yes University of Minnesota. 32 25 7 29 22 I 3 15 I • • • • OBSERVATION AND PRACTICE TEACHING ' The normal schools of the country have, from their inception, been cen¬ tered very largely in the practice school. On the other hand, university departments of education have developed the instructional and theoretical sides first and are only just now beginning to give adequate attention to the practice school. It is probably truer than many of us would wish to acknowl¬ edge that it is as yet largely on paper. The following pages, setting forth with some detail the observation and practice facilities in a considerable number of institutions, were taken, in some part, from their printed announcements but more largely from correspondence with officers of the various departments of education. The University of California and Leland Stanford Jr. University are required by state law to give training in observation and practice to matricu¬ lants for the state certificate; “at least one-third of the prescribed work in education shall consist of actual teaching in a well-equipped training-school of secondary grade directed by the department of education.” This law went into effect June, 1906. The University of California has been doing this for some years, using the city schools as a medium. So far the work has been chiefly in the grades. The university will soon maintain a high school of its o^vn. Temporarily the Leland Stanford Jr. University will arrange for practice w'ork in the San Jose Normal School. Brown University possesses excellent facilities for the practical training of Department] TEACHERS FOR SECONDARY SCHOOLS 649 teachers thru an arrangement with the school authorities of the city of Provi¬ dence. Practice teaching is done under the supervision of the director of the training-department of the Providence High Schools, who is also the pro¬ fessor of the theory and practice of education at Brown University. The director confers with the principals of the high schools and the supervising teacher as to the arrangement of hours and classes assigned to the student teachers. He visits these classes frequently and confers with the prin¬ cipal in cases of discipline arising in connection with the work of student teachers. The director nominates supervising teachers from the regular teachers employed in the high schools. The nominations must be approved by the committee on high schools in order to become valid. The university pays each supervising teacher fifty dollars for each student teacher of the first type assigned to such supervisor for full time. Any supervising teacher is entitled to free instruction at Brown University, tho the courses taken may not count toward a degree unless tuition is paid. Students who wish to be enrolled as student teachers must hold the degree of Bachelor of Arts or the degree of Bachelor of Pedagogy from some reputable institution. They must be satisfactory to the superintendent of public schools and to the professor of education of Brown University. They must take cer¬ tain prescribed courses in education at Brown University and such courses may count toward the Master’s degree. Those who complete their work in the schools and in the college receive a teacher’s diploma from the university. Weakness in discipline or in scholarship is sufficient cause for withholding the diploma. Each year the committee on high schools appoints at least six student teachers (usually three of each sex), from a list of candidates who have fulfilled the requirements for student teachers in general. These students are termed student teachers of the first class. The city pays them four hundred dollars a year for their services and they are subject to the same regulations as the regular teachers except as to the amount of work they are required to do. Their work is arranged in accordance with the plan adopted by the committee on high schools. Student teachers of the second class serve without compensation. They must do at least one hundred and twenty-five hours’ observation and indi¬ vidual instruction under the supervision of competent teachers. The plan of their work is determined by the superintendent of public schools and the professor of education. The university requirements are the same as for student teachers of the first class. When they have received the teacher’s diploma they have the same status before the committee on high schools as if they had been student teachers of the first type. In the appointment of regular teachers of the first grade, preference is given to those who have completed this course of training. The University of Wisconsin offers no specific work in practice teaching 650 NATIONAL EDUCATION ASSOCIATION [Secondary tho the department of German makes some provision for such work in con¬ nection with the elementary classes in that language. At Dartmouth College the professor of education and the graduate students in education spend one week each year visiting the high schools of Boston. Students are also urged to visit the local high school. A number of students are employed as substitute teachers in the Hanover schools and a number assist in different college courses. Such work is carried on in connection with the graduate courses which such‘students are pursuing. The University of Rochester does not attempt to give opportunity for practice teaching, tho the students in one of the Latin courses occasionally conduct the recitation of the class. Most of the students who intend to teach are given positions in the city evening schools, wLere they w'ork under expert supervision. Some of the w‘ork in the evening schools is superintended by instructors from the university. The university furnishes substitute teachers for the day high schools. AtHarvard University all students in course “Education 3” must visit schools regularly the first half-year and they must make weekly reports of these visits. The reports are vTitten and are at first made to cover a wdde range; later they must cover the field of work of special interest to the individual student. During the first half-year the students visit and report on the work in every grade from the primary school thru the high school. During the second half-year the inexperienced students of the course teach for practice in the upper grammar grades and in the high schools of Cambridge, Newton, Brook¬ line, and Medford; each student, teaching continuously some one class or section in some one subject for the half-year, being entirely responsible for the class or section of which he has charge, just as if he were the regular teacher. All the work in observation and practice is in the direct charge of one of the instructors in education from Harv^ard University. He discusses with the students their w'ork, giving aid in outlining the lessons the students are to present. The experienced students visit schools thruout the year, giving special attention to administration and organization the second half of the year. This course is open only to seniors and graduate students. The university offers one free course to one teacher for each student teaching in a given school up to the number of ten courses in any one year. During one term (twelve w^eeks) an opportunity is given the students in education at West Virginia University to observe the high-school work of the Morgantown schools. About twelve or fifteen exercises are observed. For students who have taken a number of courses in education, there is a seminar or practucum which meets twice a week for twenty-four weeks. Each student presents at least six lessons in the city schools, being informed some days in advance just what lesson is to be presented in a given subject. One student prepares a lesson plan and presents it for criticism. Each member of the seminar also prepares a tentative plan of the same lesson, the entire class being Department] TEACHERS FOR SECONDARY SCHOOLS 651 present when the lesson is presented. After the presentation of the lesson the instructor holds a conference of students for the purpose of criticism. In 1904 the University of Missouri established the Teachers College High School which now enrolls about one hundred students. Nearly all the teaching is done by senior students of the Teachers College, who receive credit for their teaching the same as for any regular university subject. Students who are to receive the teacher’s certificate must do practice teaching (from two to nine hours’ credit) one semester. The practice work is under the direct super¬ vision of the professor of theory and practice of teaching, who is also super¬ intendent of the Teachers College High School, assisted by the heads of departments of the Teachers College. The high school is under the immediate direction of a principal, the girls being in charge of a lady assistant The University of Ohio conducts no courses in observation but some instructors arrange for such work in the city high schools. The University of Washington has no practice school but students who intend to teach are requested to do a semester’s work in observation and practice in the Seattle public schools. One of the university courses which deals with secondary school curriculum requires students to devote one after¬ noon each week to observation in the city schools, under the direction of the professor of education. In connection with a course in supervision, students visit local schools to study the problems of organization and management. The University of Chicago maintains a secondary school. The teachers are experts and students have an opportunity to study the workings of the school and the methods of instruction. The announcements of the university state that practice teaching is required in certain courses in mathematics; however, no information could be obtained as to where or how the work is done. At the University of Colorado observation and practice teaching are carried on in the city schools and in the state preparatory school. The work in the city schools is in charge of the professor of education. The general direction of the observation and practice teaching is left to the head master of the preparatory school. Observation and practice teaching at the University of Nebraska. EXTRACTS FROM The Projessional Training oj Teachers. Macmillan. G. W. A. Luckey, Professor of Education, University of Nebraska. By an arrangement with the public-school authorities of Lincoln, the university students are given opportunity for observation and practice under direct supervision, cov¬ ering both elementary and high-school grades. In order to obtain this privilege the student must have reached the rank of senior and be within one year of the requirements for the university teacher’s certificate. Students are required to take certain courses in education. Partly for their convenience and partly on account of their strength, the students are divided into two classes, cadets and student teachers. The former give attention only to 652 NATIONAL EDUCATION ASSOCIATION [Secondary observation of the regular schoolwork and to the assisting of the regular teacher in the classwork; the latter, in addition to the work of cadets, are called upon as substitutes, or supply teachers, to fill temporary vacancies. Cadets receive no pay, but student teachers, when supplying, receive pay at about one-half the usual salary. There are fifteen public- school buildings in the city, to each of which may be assigned one or more cadets or student teachers, depending upon the size of the building and the number of students registering for practice-work. Students visit the building to which they are assigned at last twice a week, spending two hours on each visit. They report to the principal for duty and are sent by her to one of the rooms, where they make themselves useful by assisting the teacher in the seat and classwork of the pupils, in distributing material, etc. In this way they become familiar wdth the general plan of the schoolwork, with the names of most of the pupils; so that, when later they are called upon to supply temporarily the place of any teacher in the building to which they have been assigned, they feel at home, and the pupils look upon and respect them as regular employees or teachers. When two or more students are assigned to the same building, they arrange to have their \dsits come at different hours. The position of student teacher calls for more respon¬ sibility than that of the cadet, since the former may be called upon at any time to supply in the building to which he has been assigned, tho the supply-work of any student teacher will probably not exceed ten days per year. The city superintendent of schools is a university lecturer on school super¬ vision and he has the practical direction of cadets and student teachers. A limited number of advanced students who are carrying fewer hours of university work are employed as regular assistants and readers in the high school. They give daily service and receive pay for the same at the rate of twenty-five cents per hour. At Columbia University two practice and observation schools are main¬ tained. In one of these opportunity for practice teaching is given. The other charges a high rate of tuition and the work is in charge of expert teachers. In the school first mentioned aU work is in charge of special teachers who supervise the work of the student teachers. The second school affords oppor¬ tunity for observation. The English department requires twenty-four hours of English as a pre¬ requisite to admission to the training-course. Students who have never taught are required to teach two or three weeks. This work is carefully prepared for and carefully supervised. All students are required to make a study of the work in the Horace Mann School; to make accurate and deta’led reports of what they have seen, and to participate in critical reports of what they have seen, and in critical discussions on this work. The great need of the department is more time for practice. (Professor Baker thinks that, instead of one or two weeks, at least a month of such teachng should be required of each inexperienced teacher.) The department of mathematics has a two-hour course in observation and practice. About one-sixth of the time is allotted to observing the teaching in certain classes, and five hours to general observ^ation in the Horace Mann School. The rest of the time is devoted to teaching. All work is under the general control of the head of the department, who visits the classes as oppor¬ tunity permits, and it is under the immediate supervision of an adviser of experience who m.eets daily each student who is observing or practicing. Department] TEACHERS FOR SECONDARY SCHOOLS 653 The department of Latin follows two methods in the training of teachers. A certain amount of time, equivalent to about six weeks, one period per day, is devoted to observation in the various classes under the guidance of the teachers; they observe and report on the work that is done, and sometimes lay out the plans of lessons for the following day, which they can criticize in the light of the actual lesson. Finally, the students are given a certain amount of actual teaching. So far each student has been able to have but one or two weeks of actual practice in teaching. In the department of geology no attempt at practice teaching is made. Students who expect to teach physiography in secondary schools do obser¬ vation work. They also assist instructors in preparing laboratory materials and devising laboratory exercises and in an instance to individuals in group laboratory work. At the University of Illinois, the Academy (situated upon the campus) and the city schools of Champaign and Urbana are utilized for observation and practice purposes. A two-hour course in observation is open to juniors and a three-hour course in -practice is open to seniors. In the former, students are assigned particular courses, largely in the academy wLich they visit regularly for from four to six weeks, carefully noting the work done and having weekly conferences with the regular instructor and a member of the department of education of the university who is in charge of the practice-work. Students in the practice course teach regularly for some weeks a class assigned them in some one of the schools. CERTIFICATES A number of institutions offer a teacher’s certificate upon the completion of a certain number of hours’ w'ork in specified departments. The University of Michigan appears to have been the leader in this movement and nearly all the courses leading to this type of diploma are similar to the requirements for the teacher’s diploma of the University of Michigan. In general, certificates are based upon three sets of requirements, viz.: a) Special knowledge in the subject or group of subjects the candidate wishes to teach. h) Professional knowledge. This includes courses in pedagogy and education, and usually psychology and logic. c) General knowledge of science, mathematics, English, foreign languages, history, etc. This requirement is intended to secure as broad culture as possible. These three groups of requirements will probably cover the demands made by all the institutions which grant such certificates of qualification to teachers in secondary schools. The courses differ in the amount of work required in the different groups. In several states the university certificate is honored as a teaching certificate and, after the holder has taught a certain length of time, the state superintendent of public instruction issues a permanent certifi¬ cate to teach. Below are given extracts from the regulations of several universities which grant diplomas. No' attempt is made to study the re¬ quirements of the many small colleges which offer certificates. Their 654 NATIONAL EDUCATION ASSOCIATION [Secondary certificates are usually given to undergraduates, while the certificates here studied are issued at graduation or to graduate students. University of Wisconsin: Special, major subject; general, same as for regular course leading to degree; professional, ten hours. A law enacted by the legislature of 1901 states: “A diploma granted upon the completion of a regular collegiate course of the Univer¬ sity of Wisconsin, if accompanied by a certificate that the bearer has completed the course of pedagogical instruction prescribed by the university for all persons who intend to teach . . . . upon presentation to the state superintendent shall entitle the holder to receive from that officer a certificate which shall authorize him to teach in any public school for one year.” Section 458 h and d of the Revised Statutes provides that after one year of successful teaching the diploma of a graduate of the university may be countersigned by the state superintendent, and that when so countersigned the diploma shall have the force and effect given by law to the unlimited state certificate, and may be honored as a teaching certificate. University of Nebraska: Special, twenty hours (varies); general, qualifications for B.S. or B.A. degree; professional, eighteen hours. The university teacher’s certificate is granted to graduates of the university who have satisfactorily completed the work outlined below and have shown marked proficiency therein. “The professional work required for the teacher’s certificate may be elected by regular students above sophomore standing, by experienced teachers, and by unclassified students who satisfy the heads of departments that they are qualified to pursue the work. “Under section ten of the school law of Nebraska, as amended in 1897, state superintendent of public instruction is authorized to grant permanent state teachers’ certificates after three years’ successful experience in teaching. The certificates are also recognized by the authorities in a number of other states as sufficient evidence upon which to grant teachers’ licenses without examination.” They be may honored as a teaching certificate. University of Missouri: Special, same as for major subject; general, regular require¬ ment for graduation; professional, twenty-four hours. Gives right to teach. Life-certifi¬ cate to teach in high schools. Same general requirements as for the degree of Bachelor of Science. As part of the twenty-four hours in education, the following courses must be included: ih, or 2, 5a, 19a or 19^, and at least one special course on the teaching of some subject of high-school instruction. As part of the academic work, the candidate must elect at least eighteen hours in each subject which he expects to teach. University of Illinois: Special, major subject; general, graduation; professional, fourteen hours. Does not give right to teach. The School of Education grants no degree, power to recommend such residing in the particular college in which the student is registered. It has, however, the power to recom¬ mend the granting of a special certificate, the university certificate of qualification to teach. Upon this will be stated the major or majors of the recipient, whether definite subjects * or instruction, special subjects for supervision or general supervision. All candidates for the teacher’s certificate must take the following courses: elementary psychology (psychology i or 2, 3 hours); principles of education (education i, 5 hours); high-school organization and administration (education 6, 3 hours), and three hours of work selected from the offerings of the department of philosophy. University of California: Special, twenty hours; general, graduation, four groups; professional, twelve hours. Special knowledge, twenty units, normally, in the subject or group of closely allied subjects that the candidate expects to teach, the ultimate decision as to the candidate’s proficiency resting with the heads of the departments concerned. (In some departments more than twenty units are necessary.) Department] TEACHERS FOR SECONDARY SCHOOLS 655 General knowledge, courses sufficient to represent (with the inclusion of special studies) four groups from the following hst: Natural sciences, mathematics, English, foreign lan¬ guages, history, philosophy. This requirement is intended to secime, so far as is possible, breadth of culture and sympathy with the various Hues of high-school work. For teacher’s certificate the requirements are the same as for group elective, except that in the fifteen imits of advanced courses candidates must include iia, either 14c or one part of 23, and one other course from the list ii to 14. If, however, they are combining advanced studies in economics, pohtics, history, or jurisprudence with Enghsh for their groups, they may sutstitute for this requirement of three philological courses, any one course from iia to 14^ and two in debating (7a to 7c). Courses 9, 10, ii to 14, 17, 18, 21, 23, and the graduate courses are especially adapted to the needs of students who desire to teach. Beginning wdth December, 1905, a final examination will be required of candidates for the teacher’s certificate in Enghsh. The emphasis will be laid, not so much on detailed information as (a) on grasp of the subject of Enghsh in its twofold aspect—the language and literature, and (&) on scholarly methods and workmanship. The candidates wih be expected to satisfy the department of Enghsh that they have: i. A scholarly acquaintance with each of the three main periods of the Enghsh language and with the history of the development to the present time; 2. Familiarity, obtained at first hand, with the chief masterpieces of Enghsh hterature, "^dth the history of its development, and \\’ith the prin¬ ciples and methods of historical study; 3. Satisfactory special knowledge of one of the greater authors or of one of the main hterary movements; 4. Training in the principles and methods of poetry and prose requisite to the advajiced study of hterature; 5. SkiU in organizing and presenting thought, oraUy and in writing. Candidates are warned against supposing that the purpose of the examination can be attained by mere accumulation of courses in Enghsh. It wih always be presupposed, however, that candidates presenting themselves for examination have an equivalent of twenty-seven units of Enghsh to their credit. Teachers’ certificates. The department wdU, in general, recommend, as quahfied to teach mathematics in high schools, only such graduates as have passed with credit in courses 2, 4 , 5, 6, 9, II, 12a, 126, 13, 18. It is also of great importance that the prospective teacher of mathematics should be weU informed on the relation of mathematics to other sciences, and he should to that end devote a considerable portion of his time to at least one of the closely related sciences. The department further reserves the right to exact a practical test of the candidate’s ability to present a clear and interesting exposition of subjects taught in the high schools. For those preparing to become teachers and investigators, the indi¬ vidual aims of the student will determine, after the fundamental courses have been taken, what advanced courses should be selected. The minimum for the teachers’ recommenda¬ tion is I (lectures only), 2, 3, either 4, 5, and 7 and 17. Students who desire the teacher’s certificate should do not less than eighteen units of group elective work in German, including courses 6a, 66, 7a, 12, i8a, and 186. The recommendation for the certificate is not, however, given in course, but only for high scholar¬ ship and general proficiency in German, as judged by the department. Applicants for this certificate wall be required to take, in addition to the elementary courses, at least ten hours of junior and eight hours of senior work, but the formal comphance with this require¬ ment does not necessarily entitle the applicant to the certificate; and in any case a fair speaking knowledge will be a requisite. Twenty-four units of physics will be required for the teacher’s recommendation. Applicants for the recommendation in physics, in making up this number of units, must include in their work the equivalent of courses i and 3, with either course 4 or 2a. See statements under these headings, and under course 18. In all cases proposed combinations of courses should be submitted for approval to the professor of physics. The requirements for recommendation by the department are (a) 12 units of advanced work in Latin; (b) course 4; (c) Greek, course A (or its equivalent), but until May, 1907, a reading knowledge of French may be substituted; (d) a reading knowledge 656 NATIONAL EDUCATION ASSOCIATION [Secondary of German; (e) an acquaintance with Roman political history; (/) the distribution of the 12 units of advanced work in such a way as to show acquaintance with ante-classical and imperial Latin, and with poetry as well as prose. Students will be recommended for teachers’ certificates who, at graduation, or after, shall have completed with credit course 6 in addition to twenty-one units of university work in Greek. Graduate students will be recommended on proof of having creditably completed work equivalent to that required of undergraduates. Training-course for students intending to become teachers of chem¬ istry, 4 hours, throughout the year; i hour lecture, i period (3 hours) assisting in laboratory instruction, and 2 periods (6 hours) of laboratory work. The instruction will be partici¬ pated in by all the department instructors. Prerequisites: Courses 5a or 5&, 8. Courses I, 2, 3, 4, 5a, 8, and 28 are prerequisite for a teacher’s recommendation in chemistry. A discussion of the teaching of history in secondary schools, with special emphasis on the methods and materials. The course is designed for seniors and graduates expecting to apply for a high-school teacher’s certificate in history: Two hours, either half-year, Tuesdays, 3. Prerequisite: Courses 52, 54, 64, 63, and 73, and political*science i. The department of history will recommend for high-school teachers’ certificates only such students as have completed at least six units of each of the following six subjects: government, ancient history, mediaeval history, modern European history, English history, and American history. Those desiring teachers’ certificates are advised to take courses 4, 5, and 9, with the prerequisites, but should consult with the head of the department early in their course. Lecture courses in summer session are equivalent to course i in part and credit will not be imposed each half-year for each laboratory course. This rule applies to courses 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 9, ii, 12, 13, 14. University of Texas: Special, major subject (eighteen hours); general, graduation; professional, ten hours (3I courses), permanent teaching certificate; 2 years state: 2 courses in education and 3 other full courses; 4 years state: 3 full courses in education and 3 other full courses, 3 in education and diploma. Diplomas conferred by the board of regents upon academic graduates completing courses i, 2, 3, 4, and one other full course or its equivalent in the School of Education. Corresponds to teacher’s certificate of other uni¬ versities. Teachers’ course, a review of preparatory Latin authors and prose composition. Courses 3 and 4, at least, are prerequisite. Teachers’ course in botanical method: This course will involve discussions of the botanical content or subject-matter of nature-studies for the grades, elementary agriculture for rural schools, and the more substantial course in botany for high schools; a short review of the fundamental relations of the science to a rational teaching method; consideration of the technical details of high-school laboratory work. Prerequisites, botany i, or its equivalent, and where credit is desired in the School of Education, courses i, 2, 3, and 4 in that school. The teaching of elementary mathe¬ matics: This course is intended for those wishing to become teachers of mathematics. There will be a discussion of the underlying-principles and fundamental concepts of the subject showing the bearing of such principles and concepts on correct methods of teaching. A practical application of these discussions will be made to public-school work. It is hoped that this course will be of benefit to prospective teachers and superintendents. Special attention will be given to the teaching of mathematics in secondary schools. This course will be open to those who have had mathematics i or mathematics 2. University of Michigan: Special, major subject; general, graduation; professional, eleven hours. By authority of an act of the state legislature, passed in 1891, the faculty of this department gives a teacher’s certificate to any person who takes a Bachelor’s, Master’s, or Doctor’s degree, and also receives a teacher’s diploma as provided above. By the terms of the act, the certificate given by the faculty shall serve as a legal certificate or qualification to teach in any of the schools of this State, when a copy thereof shall have been filed or recorded in the office of the legal examining officer or officers of the county, township, city, or district. University of Iowa: Special, major subject; general, graduation; professional, eighteen Department] ' TEACHERS FOR SECONDARY SCHOOLS 657 hours. !May be honored as a teaching certificate. Students who have completed the following work and who have met the other requirements stated shall be awarded a teacher’s certificate in education: i. Twelve semester hours in education, including the courses in principles of education and in child-study. 2. Six semester hours in psychology. 3. All other requirements for the degree of Bachelor of Arts in the college of liberal arts in this university. 4. The recommendation by the department of education and the vote of the faculty upon the basis of superior work, apparent aptitude for teaching, and the fulfilment of other requirements. ^ University of Kansas, 1903-4, p. 82, teacher’s diploma: The teacher’s diploma of the university may be given to A.B., A.M. and Ph.D. graduates of the university on the foUovnng conditions: The completion of at least four years of college-work in the subject, or the closely allied subjects, that the candidate proposes to teach; the ultimate decision as to the candidate’s proficiency to rest -unth the head of the department in which the major work is taken. The completion of two and one-half terms’ work in the department of education. The candidate for the A.B. degree, who is at the same time a candidate for the teacher’s diploma, shall be required to offer twenty-five terms (about 125 semester hours) of undergraduate work. The teacher’s diploma shall be granted only to graduates whose scholarship in the twenty-five terms’ work offered for the degree and the diploma averages as high as grade ii. On presentation of the university teacher’s diploma the state board of education will issue a three-year state teacher’s certificate. At the expiration of the three-year certificate a life-certificate will be issued, if the candidate has taught successfully during two of the three years. No observation or practice teaching. Cornell University: A state certificate upon graduation good for three years, and renew¬ able for life without examination, is granted to those who successfully complete a course in the science and art of education. The university prescribed work is as follows: i psychology, general and educational, 90 hours; 2, method in teaching, 60 hours; 3, history and principles of education, 90 hours; 4, observation, 20 hours. Students who do not complete the foregoing may receive a temporary certificate upon graduation good for two years, but renewable only upon state examinations in professional subjects constituting a full equivalent for the university courses required in the first alter¬ native. The subjects for this examination are as follows: psychology, general and edu¬ cational; history and principles of education; method in teaching. University of Chicago (The College of Education): A diploma is granted after two years’ work, but the regular course of preparation covers four years. As a prerequisite, 3 units of English, 2j imits of mathematics, 3 units of foreign languages are prescribed for admission to the college. The remaining units for entrance may be selected from the rest of the ofiScial list. Thirty-six majors (4 years’ work) are required for graduation. The prescribed work of the first two years is philosophy, i major; psychology, i major; English, 2 majors; mathematics or science, 2 majors; electives, 6 majors; work in some special department, 6 majors. The work of the last two years (senior college) requires 18 majors. ACADEMIC PREPARATION There is a great difference of opinion among instructors as to the exact amount of work a student should do in any particular before he may be recom¬ mended as teacher of that subject. Institutions which grant teachers’ diplomas have definite requirements. Sometimes the requirement is uniform. More frequently there is some variation in the number of hours required in different * This certificate may also be awarded to graduate students who complete the work in education and in psychology and who receive the recommendation of the department of education and the vote of the faculty. 658 NATIONAL EDUCATION ASSOCIATION [Secondary subjects. Frequently a minimum number of hours is required but provision is made for the including of related subjects with the major subject. Some institutions have no set standard of recommendation, the matter being left entirely to the discretion of the individual instructors. The number of hours in the special subject is left to the instructor but not more than twenty-five hours may be required in one subject. At Brown University recommendation is largely a personal matter with the instructor and is not an act of the university. At Harvard the same plan is followed. In chemistry two courses are required, but two more should be taken. In history about five courses in history and government might suffice. In mathematics three courses are required and, in addition to them, there should be an additional course in mathematics, or in physics above freshman grade. However, recommenda¬ tions are sometimes made even if the candidates have not met the full re¬ quirement. In French four years’ work entitles to only a moderate testimonial. For a recommendation without reserve the candidate should have not only four full courses, but also one or two higher courses in the literature and should have good pronunciation. In the department of zoology two courses are required, but most students expecting to teach the subject take much more. The English department seldom gives recommendations as a body, this being considered an individual matter with the instructors. The instructor uses his discretion in recom¬ mending candidates, basing his recommendation upon his personal knowledge of their ability. Latin and Greek have no very definite requirements but they must be pursued at least thru the sophomore year and the student must be familiar with Greek and Latin composition. Including the work the student has had in the preparatory school, this standard means about six years of Latin and from three to five years of Greek. The teachers of Latin must be well up in Greek. The department of geology does not prepare many men for high-school work. Altho there is no definite standard, four courses would probably be sufficient to secure recommendation. The department of German requires three full years of work. At the University of Wisconsin the department of history requires thirty hours; mathematics thirty-six; English forty; Latin twxnty-six; and physics twenty-two hours. In some of the departments it is thought that more work should be taken if the student wishes to specialize. Dartmouth College has no definite system of recommendation but it is probably safe to say that the scientific departments will want a man to have all the elementary courses and one or two advanced courses in his chosen subject, before he may be recommended as prepared to teach in a secondary school. The University of Texas requires eighteen hours’ work for the major sub- Department] TEACHERS FOR SECONDARY SCHOOLS 659 jects, but the heads of some departments demand more work from subjects who expect to teach. In botany thirty hours (five courses) is recommended, tho twelve hours might be sufficient for the student who will teach botany as a minor subject. The English department asks for six hours of higher work besides the eighteen hours nominally required. The language" departments demand more work, German and Latin each asking for thirty hours. Greek should be accompanied by an extensive course in Latin. Mathematics requires about twenty-four hours, while in physics only sixteen hours are required. Physiography and zoology demand only eighteen hours. At the University of Rochester thirty hours or one-sixth of the work required for a degree is the minimum preparation for the teacher of a special subject in the high school. Of this work in the special subject from five to fifteen hours are required, the other courses in the subject or group of subjects being elective. The university has no specific regulation as to the recommendation of its candidates but the plan mentioned represents very closely the standard applied to judging the fitness of a student for high-school work. At Indiana University the major-subject requirement usually represents the amount of training that is the basis for recommendation to teach in good high schools. The major subject requires forty-five hours in the departments of Latin, English, history, physics, mathematics, and botany. In modern language the requirement is sixty hours. Besides the regular requirement in a subject the department may control twenty hours, in work closely related to the major subject. By permission a student may do more work than the forty- five hours required in the special subject. Students (special) who are special¬ izing in certain subjects will usually receive preference in recommendation as teachers of those subjects. Students who do not graduate may receive a statement of the amount of work they have done in any department. Where a teacher is required who can teach several subjects the student is required to major in but one subject. Two years’ work would be sufficient in any subject the candidate might be expected to teach, with the exception of modern lan¬ guage not studied before entering college. West Virginia University requires thirty hours of English, twenty hours of history, and ten hours of physics. In Latin the student should, at the very least, have read all of Caesar’s Gallic War, eight of Cicero’s shorter orations, besides his letters De Amicitia and De Senectute; Virgil’s Aeneid, together with the Eclogues and Georgies; the Odes and Epodes of Horace, and one book of Livy’s History oj Rome. No one charge should attempt to teach Latin until he has enough Greek to read the Anabasis, the Iliad, and the Odyssey. There is a difference in opinion among the instructors of Ohio State University as to the exact amount of work that should be required of a student who intends to teach a certain subject. About thirty hours (22 U. of 1 .) or one-sixth of the total amount of work required for graduation will probably 66 o NATIONAL EDUCATION ASSOCIATION [Secondary represent an average of the requirements. Some instructors require students to take teachers’ courses in the subjects they expect to teach. The State University of Washington adapts its requirements to the grade of high school needing teachers. There are about seven high schools of the first class in the state. For recommendation to teach in this group the student must make the special subject he is to teach his major. To teach in schools of the second class he must also have about two years’ work in any other sub¬ ject he may be required to teach. To teach in schools of the third group, college preparation is required in two or three subjects but no definite standard is set. / The University of Colorado requires thirty hours’ work, but this need not all be absolutely in one course or department; it may be in closely allied depart¬ ments. Teachers of English and of foreign languages must have twenty-five hours’ credit. The School of Pedagogy of New York University prepares mainly for the work of the elementary schools. The institution has no definite requirement as to the amount of work a student must do to receive recommendation for a position as teacher in secondary schools. At Columbia University the prerequisite for admission to secondary train¬ ing in English is twenty-four hours in English. This work must include courses in composition and in literature. The literature studies must have included both the historical and critical phases. The student must take six hours’ work in the professional course which includes a study of the subject-matter from the teacher’s point of view and a study of teaching. The student must also take the prescribed work in obser¬ vation and practice teaching. The minimum requirement for mathematics is eighteen hours but the best students usually exceed this amount. Many take from sixteen to twenty hours more than the amount required. The university requires six hours’ work in the professional or training-courses. A graduate training-course of four hours may be taken. A teacher of Latin should have a fairly complete and accurate reading knowledge of the language. He should understand the syntax and structure of the language and, in addition, should be versed in the auxiliary subjects of antiquities and literature, sufficient for the necessary illustration of his teaching. Eighteen hours must be taken before the student may be admitted to the training-courses. Twelve hours’ work is required. The official minimum requirement for the student who expects to teach geography is three years’ work, three hours a week. This course includes a course in general geography covering the elements of mathematical geography, meteorology, and climatology, the land forms and the ocean, in which study the endeavor is made to go beyond the scope of these subjects as presented in any one of the leading textbooks. In addition to this, each student is required to make a special study in the course, of the origin and classification Department] ELEMENTARY AND HIGH-SCHOOL TEACHERS 66 l of land forms, of the climate of the United States, and dynamical geology in the more advanced courses in the department of geology of Columbia University. The minimum requirement should be supplemented by work in economics, geology, and advanced work in physiography. XVII {special) WILL THE SAME TRAINING IN THE NORMAL SCHOOL SERVE TO PREPARE THE TEACHER FOR BOTH ELEMEN¬ TARY AND HIGH-SCHOOL WORK? JOHN R. KIRK, PRESIDENT OF STATE NORMAL SCHOOL .KIRKSVLLLE, MO. I. GENERAL STATEMENT 1. It is unwise and wasteful to classify prospective teachers at the beginning of their professional preparation because they all have inherited traits and capabilities which should be the criteria for their differentiation into classes. 2. It requires two or three years of instruction, intermingled with experi¬ mentation, to determine what these qualities are. 3. From the nature of the case, two or three years in the normal school or teachers’ college should be devoted to such general courses of instruction and experimentation as will reveal to the student what his talents are. 4. The final differentiation into elementary teachers and high-school teachers should probably take place during the fourth year in the normal school and in the teachers’ college. Even then it is doubtful wUether the two classes of teachers need to be separated very widely. Perhaps 90 per cent, of all the professional or technical instruction and preliminary experience in the preparation of teachers should be common to the two classes under consid¬ eration. 5. The most effective and practicable scheme in the preparation of all teachers furnishes academic and professional instruction side by side and in the later periods joins with these some constructive experience in teaching. II. BASIC FACTS Professional preparation for all teaching below the college is predetermined by the following facts: 1. Adolescence frequently begins pretty low down in the elementary school period and ends early in the high-school period. It sometimes begins late in the high-school period and continues beyond the time of high-school graduation. 2. As to aptitudes and disposition, children differ among themselves in the elementary school fully as much as they do in the high school. 3. Elementary-school children manifest in some degree practically all the traits and impulses discovered in high-school children. 662 NATIONAL EDUCATION ASSOCIATION [Secondary 4. The subjects in the curriculum (whether for elementary schools or high schools) are relatively simple and easy, while the children to be taught (whether in elementary school or high school) are infinitely varied and exceed¬ ingly hard to understand and direct. 5. Sound scholarship in the content of the school curriculum is essential. But it constitutes only part of the teachers’ burden of thought and study. The paramount problem is the school child. III. ARGUMENT Training is a bad w^ord for our purpose. It savors too much of studied imitation, of conscious repetition, and the exaltation of routine. It suggests the substitution of drilling for thinking. It signifies prescriptions and rules dictated by instructors and acquired by would-be teachers. The dog and pony show illustrates what can be done by training. The prospective teacher needs instruction and practice in constructive thinking more than he needs training. He needs frequently to apply and test his knowledge in concrete^ experience of his own. He needs direction and exercise in the use of his con¬ structive ingenuity. Opportunities for application and test of his knowledge are many and varied. In the great cities the potency of mechanism stifles spontaneity and power of personal reaction. In the country at large there is much opportunity for wholesome professional growth thru practice which is not overdirected. This may be in practice schools, or thru substitute work in schools of villages and small cities, but, best of all, in rural schools. The typical graduate of the normal school and of the teachers’ college goes about his wmrk in too large a degree conscious of rules and prescriptions learned by him while undergoing training. But he should be nearly uncon¬ scious of acquired methods. He should attack his wmrk wdth his energies centered upon the curious, inquisitive, kaleidoscopic group of persons given him to teach or exploit. During his professional preparation his skill in adaptation and his creative imagination need stimulating to the utmost. By effort he should acquire the ability to lose himself in guiding the learner and in adapting knowledge to the use of the learner. There is something in all this infinitely better than the thing we call training. The curriculum used in educating children is relatively simple and stable; but the children furnish a varying stream of thought and action exceedingly complex and difficult to comprehend. We count out a few hundred facts to be taught in the high school. We classify, tabulate, and label them. We give ample reference to bibliographies. Most of the high-school teachers have spent some years in college learning the contents of the curriculum. We permit them to make diagnoses off hand and administer the medicine with reckless unconcern. Our prescriptions are dealt out chiefly by the rule of cut and try. No one has attempted to classify, measure, and label the children of the high-school classes. Custom compels the elementary teacher to learn the natural traits of Department] ELEMENTARY AND HIGH-SCHOOL TEACHERS 663 children and to appeal to the children thru things which are known to them. But custom allows the high-school teacher tolerably free rein to follow his tastes and inclinations. Hence he usually patterns after those who taught him. With somewhat better scholastic acquirements than the elementary teacher has, he is frequently a narrower person, living more wdthin his limited specialties, and teaching subjects, not persons. He is sometimes woefully ignorant of the child to be taught. We are not likely to make progress, excepting in spots, until some parts of our educational creed are reconstructed. One of them innocently promulgated from the circles of higher education is to the effect that a half-educated person is good enough to teach children up to and including the last day in the ele¬ mentary school, while a fully educated person is needed to take charge of the child on the next day in school, i. e., the first day in the high school. By this tenet the typical normal school graduate with insufficient academic attain¬ ments and much dogma stands for the half-educated person, while the univer¬ sity graduate crammed and surfeited with ill-digested facts and theories acquired in college lecture rooms represents the fully educated person. This creed is convenient and practical. It is more easily lived up to than a better creed would be. It is damaging to all education. I think we should repudiate these invidious discriminations, for if anyone needs a college education it is the teacher who guides the children thru the varied subjects used in the grammar-school grades. If anyone needs critical and available knowledge of human nature in the uncertain period of child¬ hood and the stormy stages of adolescence it is the teacher of the high-school child. Most of the normal schools offer limited courses which high-school gradu¬ ates finish in two years. This custom precludes separation of students with a view to preparing them for different kinds of service, because it is impossible in so short a time to differentiate and test the students sufficiently to determine the kind of teaching to which they are severally adapted. Out of a lot of two-year-old colts a horse-trainer, judging from structure, may select the trotting horse or the roadster or the one to pull the beer wagon; but we cannot so classify prospective teachers. One professor of education in a great uni¬ versity informs me that the girls entering his department have already decided to be high-school teachers. There is an educational caste in his state. He says the graduates of his department would be humiliated were they required to teach in elementary schools; but some of these prospective teachers are by nature and acquired traits adapted to the work of primary teachers and nothing else; others among them are versatile, forceful persons, adapted to the varied life of the grammar-school teacher and wholly unfit for the confining specialties of secondary education. But it requires many months of time to classify these persons and so direct their study and work that no part of their professional lives shall be wasted. It therefore seems clear that a teachers’ college or normal school offering such a short cut to professional life as a two 664 NATIONAL EDUCATION ASSOCIATION [Secondary years’ course should devote itself to general courses of instruction and practice, leaving final differentiation to be determined after graduation. But some normal schools offer academic courses covering the college curriculum, about two-thirds of the student’s energy being devoted to academic subjects; about one-third, to professional preparation. Such schools offer special courses for the different classes of teachers. But they find that a very large part of all that the elementary teacher should know is needed also by the high-school teacher and vice versa. They find that the high-school teacher should not be ignorant of the phases of life in elementary schools; for it is impossible to guide with certainty the high-school student if the teacher is ignorant of the preliminary stages thru which the student must have come. As an illustration, suppose a would-be teacher detaches himself from ordinary family life for a period of five or six years and isolates himself in university life to delve in knowledge and perchance to write a hundred letters for research material out of which to make a thesis. Will he not certainly get out of sympathy with the ways of child-life ? Is it not clear that he will have to serve an expensive apprenticeship in order to reinstate himself in the ideals of child-life ? Must he not learn by wasteful experiment to interpret the inherited and acquired qualities in the victims of his empiricism ? The facts seem to show unmistakably the unsoundness of the doctrine that a child may at one time have for his teacher a sensible, practical, resource¬ ful person of meager academic attainments and at another time a teacher of deep scholarship in a few specialties and dense ignorance in more vital things. And surely the typical normal school should stand for better scholarship in its graduates; but the university should remove the strong hand with which it clutches the high-school teaching corps. The normal school should look into and master the requirements of high-school instruction. The university should have a higher conception of the preparation of all teachers. It should be as close to the elementary school as to the high school. The university now stands for knowledge as against processes in teaching. It should go to the very foundations of that knowledge which appertains to the capabilities, inclinations, inheritances, and possibilities of the child and the youth to be taught. This paper presents no specifics, devices, schemes, or mechanisms for preparing high-school teachers. It seeks to make clear some conceptions of life in education which ought to be wrought into the constitution of every ^ w'ould-be teacher. The school child from six to twenty is a child thru all his years of schooling. He is the product of forces preceding him. His inheritances and experiences make him what he is. Without knowledge of these potencies his teacher cannot with certainty direct his energies. We have a somewhat top-heavy high-school curriculum. Higher educa¬ tion provides for that and sends out peripatetic pedagogs to enforce its dicta. The typical high-school teacher lacks sympathy for and insight into the transi- Department] ELEMENTARY AND HIGH-SCHOOL TEACHERS 665 tion period of growing high-school children, too many of whom suffer with mental dyspepsia, being loaded with undigested and indigestible food for the mind. Fresh green graduates in the role of teachers are driving out our rest¬ less boys from the high schools. Girls being used to the cramping effect of conventionalities, cannot be driven from school by empiricism, tyranny, or routine. Yet they suffer much. To meet the conditions teachers will have to be so prepared as to know the background below the plane of consciousness in the high-school child and to see how things must look to him. They will have to be capable of worrying over his habits and deeds. They will have to be able to discover the avenues to his consciousness. By instruction and trial they will be obliged to learn how to reach his consciousness thru its content in order to direct energy in the mastery of things outside that content. They have no right to invade classrooms with masses of knowledge all formulated and ready to transfer to the consciousness of the high-school child regardless of his previous knowl¬ edge and experience. Each boy lives in a world of concrete tangible things. These constitute the soil in which to sow. But first they have to be discovered so that we may start the boy from things known to him in his work and play. Conceptions of grammar are nearly impossible to some sensible boys because they have no kindred ideas to compare it with. This paper, therefore, ventures to suggest some mental states or attitudes with which efficient teachers by instruction or experience grow familiar. These states or attitudes need not be known in any particular form; but their recognition, study, and use become part of the conscious or unconscious habit of every efficient teacher in every school. Among these may be men¬ tioned the following; 1. The non-receptive or unimpressionable state of mind. Students at times do not hear what is said to them. Tho respectful in bodily attitude their minds seem inactive or non-receptive. At other times they are wakeful, attentive, thoughtful, in receptive attitude. Many of them are non-receptive because the only existing avenues to their consciousness are ignored. The inattention of children is usually not their fault. It is just a part of themselves. No two are reached equally well at the same time thru the same avenues to their consciousness. Each child has a mass of concrete personal experiences thru which he hears and sees. He is receptive when approached thru these experiences. When not so approached he is non-receptive. Skilful and sympathetic teachers never proceed without believing that those to be taught are in receptive attitude. And it is for prospective teachers thru instruction and experiment to gain insight into varied human nature so that they may with certainty secure this attitude even from the most indifferent students. 2. Thru the recitative attitude we secure expression of the simplest kind of mental reaction. This attitude does not imply much thinking. It does not require much. It implies receptivity and just enough of mental reaction 666 NATIONAL EDUCATION ASSOCIATION [Secondary to reproduce forms spoken or otherwise delivered or assigned by teachers. From primary school to college typical lesson assignments presuppose that lessons are to be looked at or heard and reproduced to the teacher in the way he wants them delivered to him. And, altho the recitative attitude signifies poor teaching and vague conceptions of the teacher’s relation to the one taught, it is still the pedagog’s mainstay, his stock in trade, his source of greatest pride. To lead young teachers to use it effectively and yet to realize its utter inadequacy by itself is one of the hardest and longest tasks in the preparation of all teachers. 3. The reiterative attitude is the recitative with concentration a little pro¬ longed. It is based upon good receptivity. But the reciter in this attitude is unduly conscious of the forms of expression. He lacks spontaneity. When started on a paragraph or a page which he is to reiterate, he is like a boy coasting; it is disagreeable to be upset. He can’t get another good start without returning to the point of departure. But I have visited many high- school teachers and college professors who rely chiefly upon the reiterative attitude and glow with enthusiasm when a poor parrot of a child can repeat, perchance in his own words, a long paragraph or a long lesson. 4. Without a generation of college professors who know good teaching and practice it, the preparation of high-school teachers can never succeed very well. So often the professor says to his students: “Read the book and get the author’s thought;” or, “Listen to me and get my thought.” But reading is not getting another person’s thought. Reading is thinking; and hearing-language is thinking. So long as teachers and pupils meet chiefly for recitation their thinking is of a low type. Infinitely better than reciting and reiterating is cogitating. Every true teacher secures from each one taught the cogitative attitude of mind. But the typical professor dislikes to be inter¬ rupted in his lectures. He desires students to hear and reproduce “in sub¬ stance” what he says. He seems not to know that hearing-language and observing and reading are all thinking processes requiring continuously the cogitative attitude of the mind. He is too commonly a recitationist; but he influences tremendously the high-school teachers. They follow his ways. His apparent purpose is to produce reciters rather than thinkers. He thinks and formulates for them. They recite after him. How delightful it is to run across those rare ones among us who are skilful in having students work out and think out and formulate subject-matter with them. It is for normal schools and teachers’ colleges to recast a great part of the current conception of the teacher’s function and by a large variety of teaching experiments to bring all prospective teachers into a condition of constant eagerness to teach skilfully thru utilization of the ever-varying attitudes of those to be taught. 5-7. The inquisitive, skeptical, and critical attitudes of mind are suppressed in a large proportion of high-school and college classes. The typical recita¬ tion hearer does not enjoy them. They savor too much of disrespect for his Department] ELEMENTARY AND HIGH-SCHOOL TEACHERS 667 dogmatism. They throw him off his beaten track. They disturb his habit as a recitationist. They dislocate the adjustment of his oft-repeated story. They are too much like common life outside the school; they turn the mind from form to content. They lead toward definite questions, answers, argu¬ ments, and conclusions. They force issues to finalities. They are the delight of the full-fledged artist teacher in every school of every kind. 8. Another characteristic of good teaching is the combative or disputative mental attitude which implies living together as student and teacher and strug¬ gling with one another in friendly combat. In this attitude the student would not hurt the teacher’s feelings, the teacher would not play boss or dog¬ matist, both student and teacher delight in courteously m.aking unlooked-for interpretation of things, teacher and student live together in subjects, work out things together, indulge in sparkling, friendly croc-s fire, and welcome witty retorts made in good temper. But how can normal schools and teachers’ colleges prepare teachers to skilfully utilize this state of mind ? Partly, per¬ haps, by instruction, but more by exemplifying it thru companionship with students in classrooms while teaching classes in the ordinary academic sub¬ jects. And the college professor should give us a square deal and do his share. 9. The discursive or argumentative attitude of the mind is better still. As a school inspector I many times longed to discover some difference of opinion between the high-school teacher and his students. The peaceful, monotonous harmony which commonly prevails in the high-school classes, means low mental vitality and wasted opportunities. It marks long and slow growth into habitual credulity. Where the critical, honestly skeptical, inquisitive, cogitative attitudes are utilized, the many persons taught see and think of many things which the one person who teaches cannot see or think of. Frank and honest exchange of ideas as to how things look does not mean waste. It means joint action and larger thought product. It means divided responsi¬ bilities and definite conclusions. It does not mean opinions formed by teacher and taught to students. It means conclusions that stick forever because they are worked out in the friendly competition of many persons, each one’s notion being tested by the criticism of many others. 10. Best of all is the constructively synthetical attitude. It is seldom found in the typical high-school recitation. It is sometimes found in the grammar-school grades where alert, well-taught, masterful teachers dare allow their pupils to think for themselves, to struggle with subject-matter, to sum up or build up conclusions and declare where they are, how far they have come, and what they anticipate in view of the mental structures already erected. This list of attitudes'is illustrative, not exhaustive. The typical normal school delivers recipes and prescriptions for doing things. The teachers’ college in the university is perhaps a little worse; it quotes from a larger bibliography. Both normal schools and teachers’ colleges are consuming their best energies learning and reciting what some one has thought and for¬ mulated. But the poorest thing by which we deceive ourselves is the median- 668 NATIONAL EDUCATION ASSOCIATION [Secondary ism called the recitation. It assumes the student to be a reflecting machine to receive and return ideas and impressions. Professors who rely chiefly upon the lecture, the “quiz,” and the “exam” seldom appreciate any process above the recitative. They assume receptivity. They are satisfied to receive back the content of talks and textbooks. When, by repression and bodily inaction, students lapse into somnolent torpidity, then inefficiency finds relief in note¬ books. Voluminous copies of profoundly obscure lectures are kept. Bodily action in note-taking keeps awake the students of many an inefficient professor. There is fatal sequence. Stenographers copy into notebooks what speakers say, put aside notebooks feeling free from worry of cogitation, and later on reproduce from notes exactly what was uttered. In like manner the pedagog substitutes transmission for cogitation, obstructs thinking, prevents face to face contact with living teacher and snatches away opportunity to comprehend and assimilate subject-matter while fresh and new. “Quiz” follows lecture, further disguising professional unfitness. “Quiz¬ zing” is not teaching. “Quizzing” narrows thinking of many into channels of one. The “exam” concludes the hampering process. Much lecturing and “quizzing” call for much examining because teacher is ignorant of student’s mental content and attitude. But lecture, “quiz,” and “exam” are the stock in trade of many a friend of ours who never dreams of cogitating, analyzing, questioning, arguing, and working out with students the subject-matter to be dealt with, digested, and assimilated. IV. CONCLUSION All teachers during their professional preparation need in common: 1. To secure by instruction and experience a working knowledge of child¬ hood and adolescence. 2. To acquire in teaching the habit of basing daily instruction on the learner’s mental content and attitude in order to modify both his content and his attitude and accustom him to the habitual and independent reorganization of his mental content. 3. By trial in many phases of experimental teaching they need severally to discover themselves and what their several talents are, and in view of their talents inherited and acquired, what they are severally destined to do best. To do all this will consume by far the greater part of the time and energy which teachers can devote to initial preparation. Probably one-tenth of the labor in the professional preparation of teachers should be devoted to special pedagogical aspects of subjects to be taught. In these special aspects high-school teachers and elementary teachers, after differentiation and near the end of their professional preparation need sepa¬ rate instruction in such things as bibliographies, appliances, and the corre¬ lation of each separate subject with other parts of the curriculum. ^ •' -v WSk::’-' ^ ■ -■"■" . - -rcwi^'-vv ?v^.>* * i-^ .. ‘ "jrtft..vrA-^' V,. ■. '• S^a-.: 'ft-' ^:r^''V;" -^s-'- ^, i ' .1 ^-‘v. ' ' ’1, >'» I'l* '*; '' -* , i - •- - J - '■•■•* V* ' - -- ■* • J ■-« * '■ -^jei^ ' _ * ‘ 'i * it v^“ V:"' » • >»_/, v ■» •» >• ~ T Y ^ - •-.. - - ' - -♦ •> ■ -I w* Jt . AT'V. • '• • ' - ■ "•' ■- '■ "-. '*•■ . - . -•- •):;. ; .'. r. ' v,?;:. =>.■=;■ '• rl rJ* . • --.- . -..-..Vv^ p. iV.^- _ fc« 1 ■BS^ ^ V, j ■ .• HI^CaUV WsZ 1 '"i ^ • V* ' t< t «. «• . r ' ^ f' •' . / ^ ■ ’• ' . ’■-’r ' -- ' ” ' --'■'v’''^"' C" ‘ -?■/'■ • ■• - * ■ . " V V -.' .1 jL -i ■ ■'■ '» '*'*‘' ~ - '* '“* :• ^^■■- --c*c>-‘::.-- -'Vi-:-''-, - --.^- P: - w '•= '>C*- ' r . • • 4 * * ** >. 5 . :;;.'v " ■'■ '■■■ '■ fe ■^"■' »■ ' JU ^ <. I I i / '■f - : V ii