CjO t Jii.lv. of jil. Library 51 33 /Y HUDSON RPffi RAIL ROAD \ EEPOET Oak Street UNCLASSIFIED .. LOCATION OF THE LINE usamaa.^ ©enevai Ketnavfts ON THE PROSPECTS OF THE ROAD. JOHN B. JEHVIS, Chief Engineer. JANUARY 12th, 1848. V\WAN*AS\W Yorfe: WM. C. BRYANT & CO. PRINTERS, Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2017 with funding from University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign Alternates https://archive.org/details/hudsonriverrailrOOjerv OFFICE OF THE HUDSON RIVER RAILROAD COMPANY, } Engineer Department, > New-York, 12th January, 1848. } To the Board of Directors of the Hudson River Railroad Company : Gentlemen — I have the honor of presenting a report on the question of the loca- tion of the line of road from FISHKILL TO GREENBUSH. Examinations and surveys have been diligently prosecuted by Mr. Clark, the locating engineer, and he has submitted a detailed report with estimates on two routes. In preparing the lines for each route, surveys have necessarily been run over a great extent of country, in order to find the most favorable line for each. In the original survey of Mr. Morgan, the point of divergence from the river was at Fishkill, rising gradually, and as it approached Wappinger’s creek it followed the eastern slope of the valley, passing near Houstonville, and crossing the creek east of the falls. The line then inclined westward, intersecting the old post road, and continuing near it until it reached the eastern part of Poughkeepsie. This line was found to be so unfavorable that a new point of divergence was taken at Wappinger’s creek, and a route found, which passed Poughkeepsie, about half-way between the above line and the river, and intersected it about two miles north of Poughkeepsie. This portion of the line was found about one mile shorter, and much less expensive than the original or eastern line, and therefore it was decided to adopt it for this portion of the interior route. As the maps, submitted herewith, will show the line better than any written description, they are referred to for in- formation on this point. The river route generally follows along or near the shore of the river. At Pough- keepsie, Staatsburgh and Barrytown it passes back from the river, in order to avoid interfering with docks, at the first and last place, and a sharp bend in the river at the other. In these departures the grade rises from 20 to 30 feet above that on the immediate shore of the river. The grade at Albany was taken at 22 feet above low water in the river, and gradually declined, keeping above the influence of the freshets, until the point was reached where the freshets of the river do not raise the water above flood tides; from this point the usual level above the river was taken. The comparative result of the estimates has been different from what was gene- rally expected. After diligent surveys the best line that could be found for the in- terior route from Fishkill to a short distance north of Staatsburgh, is so expensive as to have but little superiority over the river route. From near Staatsburgh to Hudson the general character of the interior route is highly favorable, offering a very easy line to grade, comparing very advantageously with the river line opposite. The line continues favorable from Hudson to about six miles north of Kinderhook village; but from this point to near Albany it is of a very expensive character, so much so that it raises the estimate between Hudson 4 and Albany about $100,000 above that of the river route on the corresponding section. The main difficulties on the interior route, it will be seen, occur in ascending from the river to the table land. At the north end it passes a series of deep ravines and clay ridges. The table land could have been reached with a much less expensive line, if a grade of thirty feet to the mile had been adopted; but this was regarded as incompatible with the great object to be secured. The following tables show the degree and amount of curvature and straight line on each route, and the inclination of the several lines, or gradients of the road, with the elevation and depression on each route: SUMMARY OF CURVES AND STRAIGHT LINES. RIVER ROUTE. Number of Length of Radii in Deflection in Curves. Curve of Feet. Degrees. same deflec- tion, in miles. 4 0.348 2062 41® 45’ 4 1.490 2475 191® 78 15.418 3094 1480® 05’ 1 0.664 3375 33® 7 1.523 3713 124® 10’ 30 6.716 4125 495® 29’ 10 2.976 4641 194® 5 1.093 5305 51® 20’ 14 2.363 6188 113® 30’ 1 0.184 7426 18® 7 1.850 9282 60® 20’ Total curved line, ... 34.625 Straight line ... 48.375 << Length in miles, . . . . . 83.000 SUMMARY OF CURVES AND STRAIGHT LIN INTERIOR ROUTE. Number of Length of Radii in Deflection in Curves. Curve of Feet. Degrees. same Deflec- tion, miles. 3 0.818 2062 116® 2 0.184 2475 24® 34 8.578 3094 834® 18’ 3 1.289 3713 105® 23 3.347 4125 252® 36’ 4 1.462 4641 95® 20’ 27 10.094 6188 528® 15’ 5 1.808 9282 59® Total Curved line 44 Straight line ... 54.885 44 Length in miles . . . . . . 82.465 /Total Deflection in Degrees. 2802 ° 39 Total Deflection. 2014° 29’ 5 RIVER ROUTE. Table of Grades and Level Lines between Fishkill Landing and Greenbush. Distance in miles. Inclination per mile Ascent Descent Total Ascent and in feet. in feet. in feet. Descent. 49.312 Level. 9.204 0.271 2.50 2.50 5.993 0.500 3.00 3.00 1.759 1.136 2.00 2.00 2.454 2.445 6.00 6.00 1.000 5.00 5.00 5.00 2.250 3.007^ 2.0061? 22.50 ) 30. 1 1 20. 1 2.505 a 1,503 & 10.00 15. 25. | 127.50 1 1.503 8 J 0.504 15 7.50 15., 1 7.50 83.000 83.50 70,00 153.50 INTERIOR ROUTE. Table of Grades and Level Lines between Fishkill Landing and Greenbush. Distance in miles. Inclination per mile Ascent Descent Total Ascent and in feet. in feet. in feet. Descent. 8.888 5.276 From 3 to 4 8.80 11 19.80 1.012