CHRISTIANITY WITHOUT THE CROSS A CORRUPTION OF THE GOSPEL OF CHRIST. A SERMON, PREACHED BEFORE THE UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD, ON SEPTUAGESIMA SUNDAY, 1875. WITH A NOTE ON " MODERN CHRISTIANITY A CIVILISED HEATHENISM." BY THE REV. E. B. PUSEY, D.D. REGIUS PROFESSOR OF HEBREW, AND CANON OF CHRIST CHURCH. SOLD BY JAMES PARKER & CO., OXFORD, And 377, Strand, London ; And RIVINGTONS, london, oxford, and cambridge. 1875. PRINTED BY THE SOCIETY OF THE HOLY TRINITY, HOLY ROOD, OXFORD. CHRISTIANITY WITHOUT THE CROSS A CORRUPTION OF THE GOSPEL OF CHRIST. S. Luke ix. 23. '^And He said unto all, If any ivill come after Me, let him deny himself, and take up his cross daily j andfolloiu Me." Does then our Redeeming Lord indeed speak these words to us? Is there no way out of them? Would He still say them, if He were to come again upon earth and preach in our marketplaces ? But was He not then the Eternal Word ? Did He not say, " Heaven and earth shall pass away, but My words shall not pass away?" Does He not say, " The word that I have spoken, the same shall judge him in the last Day ? " Does not that Other Comforter, as He called Him, that "best Preacher," God the Holy Ghost, still preach those words to us many times in the year ? Are they not part of the " everlasting Gospel ''? " But what then ? Does not only men's practice, in great measure, fall short of the Pattern and Ideal set before them, but is, as has been said, "Modern Christianity a civilised Heathenism''?" Do men not only but half-believe our Blessed Lord's words, but is His plan a failure? Have we altogether parted with Him Whom we adore, a Rev. xiv. 6. ^ See Note at the end. E 2 4 C'lirisfiauiti/ ivithont the Cross AVhom we desire to love ? Or, how is this state of things around us compatible with the Divinity of the Gospel, which He was ? Compatible it certainly is, since He predicted it. For what else do the parables of the tares and the wheat ; the good and bad fish in the one net of the kingdom of God ; the three sorts of soil, upon which the seed sown was wasted, and the one soil in which it yielded varied proportions of fruit ; the wise and foolish virgins ; the sheep and the goats ; the slothful servant who knew his Lord's will and did it not; the many called and the few chosen; the wide gate and the broad way which leadeth unto destruction, and the many who go in thereat ; those who shall say in that Day, " Have we not pro- phesied in Thy Name, and in Thy Name done many wondrous works ? " and to whom He shall say " I never knew you;" those who should cause one of those little ones who believe in Him to offend, and for whom it would be better that they should be cast into the sea ; — What is this and the like, but that chequered scene of good and evil which our eyes behold ? Nay, He pictures the times before His Coming '^ as just such times of luxury, selfishness, worldhness, as we see all around us. He tells us of that abounding of ini- quity and the consequent chillness of love ^, which we too well know. One who less knew the human heart than He Who made it, or the intensity of its self-will, might well have thought that it could not resist such overpowering love, as God has shewed us. It is not in the heart of man to iraa- « S. Matt. xxiv. 38. 39. '' lb. 12. a corniptlon of the Gosjxd of Christ. 5 gine such obduration of the soul against it, even as some picture to themselves a conversion of the soul after death, in those who will not, to the end, be turned back to God here. One who had not a Divine knowledge of the heart would not have ima- gined such Divine love wasted. To human success it is essential to believe its own power to succeed. " " They can because they think they can," is true of men. Divine wisdom alone knew the limits which self-obdurating free-will would set to the prevailingness of Divine love and Divine grace. Success and failure were predicted at once ; Divine success from Divine power : partial failure con- temporaneous with the success, from the limit which God set to the putting-forth of His own Omnipotency — our free-will. We may then well dispense ourselves from the superfluous task of vindicating our Redeemer. The love of God, revealed to us in Christ, has eternal ends, even beyond that unutterable bliss of those who will to be saved. "God hath set us the Apos- tles last," S. Paul says f, "as a spectacle to the world and to Angels and to men ," — " ^to the intent that now unto the principalities and powers in heavenly places might be known through the Church the manifold wisdom of God." " The Angels," we are told, '"'desire to look into the Sufferings of Christ and the glory which should follow." Nay, even apart from the hints which Holy Scripture gives us, it were inconceivable that the mystery of the Incarnation, the union of God the Creator with « Possunt, quia posse videntur. *" 1 Cor. iv. 9. s Eph. iii. 10. f' 1 S. Pet. i. 12. 6 Christianity without the Gross us, should not iu ways, more unutterably vast than we can imagine, affect every order and indivi- dual of that creation, those gigantic Intelligences and Powers, of whom we know scarce anything except what is conveyed to us by their names, but over whom, with us, our Incarnate Lord is Head \ But, leaving to Almighty God the wisdom of His own doings, it concerns us more nearly, yea most nearly, (for it may be our salvation) — since there is this evident contrast between the precepts of our Lord and the outward shew of much which thinks itself Christian, which would be shocked and feel itself ao-o-rieved or insulted, if it were told that it is not Christian, — have we corrupted Chris- tianity ? The question ought not to startle us. Where are those seven Churches, to whom God the Holy Ghost dictated those seven Epistles in the Apocalypse, and of the corruption of which', or their chequered good and eviP, or even of whose unmixed good, yet of the necessity of perseverance', He wrote ? And yet what He said to them, He says expressly that He said to all who have an ear to hear, "°'He that hath an ear to hear, let him hear what the Spirit saith unto the Churches." Corruptions in the Western Churches before the reformation were miserably great ; all acknowledge it : there would not have been otherwise a rent so great. Protestant missionaries have not much more to say of the Eastern Church. I am not speak- i Eph. i. 10, 21. Phil. ii. 10. 1 S. Pet. iii. 22. J Sardis, Kev. iii. 1 — 6; Laodicea, lb. 14 — 21. ^ Ephesus, lb. ii. 1 — 7; Pcrgamos, lb. 12 — 17. J Smyrna, ii. lb. 8—11 : Thyatira, lb. 18—29 ; Pliiladelphia, lb. iii. 7— 13. n^b. iii. 22. a corritptioji of the Got^pel of Chri>;t. 7 ing of our devotions, or of that which, as a Church, we teach and set forth as truth ; but of that which they contradict, what we should amend if we fol- lowed them — our popular maxims, our lives. Is our 19''' century Christianity, in all which concerns our lives, in that habitual every day course of life whereby we are pleasing or displeasing God, our standard of what is right or wrong, like that which our Lord left on earth for us to follow ? Again, I speak not of the poor. They are the spe- cial heritage of Christ. His mission was especially to preach the Gospel unto them. He pronounced them " blessed." He declared that *' theirs is the kingdom of Heaven." Even now they bear still the likeness of His outward lot. They wear His livery and badge. Poverty is full often a sort of sacrament to them, conveying to them His hidden grace ; their privations, when well-endured by His grace, are ""a kind of sacrifice to Him ; they, even by their patient endurance, will have some portion of the reward of those who not only believe, but also suffer for His sake." And happily they are the largest portion of Christendom. Christ is probably more often to be found in the hovels of the poor than in the drawing-rooms of the rich. At the worst I should think that in that great Babylon, our metropolis, the atmosphere of S. Giles' was more healthy for the fruits of the Gospel than the air of Belgravia. But again, I speak not of individuals. However horribly like, not theiy- condition, but our's also, is to that of Dives, God alone knows who are really ^ Keble's Lenten Sermons, p. 19. 8 Christianity ivithout the Cross such. In outward luxuries we far exceed him. The whole realm of luxury and comfort has ex- panded, even to those who have fewest of what would be called luxuries. He had not the neces- saries of his breakfast from the two opposite ends of the earth, or his fuel from the earth's bowels, gained by the unacknowledged and unthanked toils of his fellow-men. It were well, exceeding well for us, if we were content with the luxuries which the Prophets condemned. This outward lot is not, we must hope, their and our all. In one way it bears most on our judgement hereafter, whether we are steadily setting ourselves to act up to what we know. We are not responsible, in the same degree, for the fog and mist around us, which hinders our seeing beyond a little way, unless we could ourselves remove it. And yet, although we be swept along by the torrent of tyrant custom, or may not see how effectually to resist it, we must often have felt a misgiving, "Are we honest with the words of .Christ ?" Let us hear Him, as we just now heard Him. It is He, our Redeemer, our Judge, Who speaks, " If any will come after Me, let him deny himself and take up his cross daily and follow Me." Our Lord sets Himself before them to accept or to refuse, if any mil. God so loveth the free choice and love of His creatures, that He draggeth us not as stones, but draws us with cords of loving-kindness. God became Man to win our love. He calls us on no road which He hath not Himself tracked with His Blood. The closer we follow, (even reason tells us,) the nearer we come to Him.^ He respects our freewill, in which He created us, a comvpfion of tie Gosjjel of Ghn'sf. 9 whether we will follow Him or no; but, if we will to follow Him, the way is but one. He is the Truth, and cannot bid us follow Him in ways which lead away from Him. He cannot bid us serve Him and that which is contrary to Him. "Ye cannot serve God and Mammon." It is a contradiction, as it would be to walk on two op- posite roads at once, to go at once backwards and forwards. The words are simple, "If any will to follow Me, let him deny himself, and take up his cross and follow Me." Self-renunciation stands at the threshold of the school of Christ. Our Master saith not, (in our petty way of speaking of "self- denial ") " let him lay aside this or that," but " himself " {apvr^arda-Qw eavrov). It were little to re- nounce what one has, unless one renounce also what one is. One might renounce anything one has, and plume ourselves on having renounced it. The self which we are to renounce is the self, which is opposed to God and the will of God. "We are," says a father", "one thing, as we are fallen by sin ; another, as we were created by nature ; one thing, which we have made, another, which we loere made. Let us forsake ourselves, such as we have by sinning made ourselves, and remain ourselves, such as by grace we have been made. The proud, who by conversion to Christ hath been made humble, has forsaken himself. The luxurious, who has changed his life to conti- nence, hath renounced what he was. The covetous, who hath ceased to seek for gain, and hath learned to give bountifully of his own, hath forsaken ° S. Greg, in Evangel. Horn. 32. n. 2 (abridged). 10 Chrliiilaiiity ivUhuiit the Cross liimself . He is himself by nature ; lie is not him- self in ill. Paul had denied himself, who said, *yet I live, but not I.' Dead was that fierce per- secutor, and there had begun to live the pious preacher. *But Christ liveth in me.' 'T,' he saith, * am dead from my former self, for I live no longer after the flesh ; but not dead essentially, for in Christ I live spiritually.' Let then the Truth say, *If any will to come after Me, let him deny him- self;' for unless any cease from himself, he ap- proacheth not to Him, Who is above himself ; nor can he lay hold of that which is beyond himself, if he know not how to do to death what he is." So far the first step of being a disciple of Christ is to "cease to do evil," as Isaiah p says. But it is not an abnegation of this or that evil thing in him, but liimself. It is not, to renounce sensuality, and retain pride ; to renounce sloth, and retain ambi- tion; to cease to abuse God's gifts, and by self- exaltation to be ungi'atef ul to the Giver ; to refrain from active evil, yet to be ashamed of Christ and His words ; to diminish self-indulgence, yet shew no mercy to the poor ; to prize the truth, yet speak evil of dignities ; to own one's self a miserable sinner, and be angry because one is slighted. Real self-renunciation is in all things, and as one tied by one leg may walk for miles, but quit not the spot where he is tied ; so one unrenounced evil habit keeps the soul Satan's prisoner, that he cannot follow Christ. Whoso renounceth not his whole self is Hke one who walks all night in a r Is. i. 16. "Depart ftx)m evil and do good." Ps. xxxiv. 14, xxxvii. 27. a corruption of the Gospel of Christ. 1 1 mist, and finds himself in the morning close to what was a burthen to him and what he had thrown down. Self-surrender must be complete. Else it is, at best, the surrender not of self, but of one part of self; a sacrifice, like that utter destruction of what was vile and worthless in Saul's eyes, for which God rejected himself ; a sacrifice, such as men will offer to any of the idols of this world, of that which costs them nothing, compared to that which they gain. All of us have renewed our vows to re- nounce the devil and — not some of his works but all; not some of the sinful lusts of the flesh, but all; to love God with all our heart, with all our mind, with all our soul, with all our strength ; we have " renounced the devil and all his works ; the vain pomp and glory of the world, and the carnal desires of the flesh, so that we will not follow nor be led by them." What can we retain, which shall not brand us as perjured persons, perjured to our Re- deemer and our God ? One deadly sin, wilfully and knowingly indulged, absolutely separates from God. Not that the sinner's state is so hopeless, or that he need be so far separate from God, as by mani- fold sins, though deadly sins seldom come singly ; but all seeming or real natural good unites not to God one, whom one unrepented, repeated sin separates from Him. It is God Himself Who says, " "i If a man keep the whole law, yet offend in one point, he is guilty of all;" for all are one whole, and One is the Giver of all. This lies at the threshold of the Gospel : one 1 S. James ii. 10. 12 Christuiuifij icithoiit tlie Cross deadly sin, persevered in, separates from Christ; one deadly sin persevered in, enlists us in war against Christ ; and makes us, instead of soldiers of Christ, mercenaries of the Enemy ; our name of Christian, until we repent, brands us as deserters. But our Lord goes on, " let him deny himself, and take up his cross." " Here," some may tell me, " we have a metaphor, and metaphors may not have a very precise meaning." Doubtless, many of us have passed over this saying, as not ha^dng a very definite meaning. Yes ! but also metaphors may have a very deep meaning ; nay, it is for the sake of that deeper meaning, that the metaphor is used at all, because it expresses more than could be taught in plain terms, without it. And here the metaphor is from Christ Himself, and the bitter Passion which He willingly underwent for love of each one of us. It was probably the first time that our Blessed Lord had spoken plainly of that Death. He had before told them of the mourning, when He, Whom S. John Baptist had spoken of as the Bridegroom, *■ should be taken from them : He had declared their future blessedness, "* when men shall hate you, and shall cast out your name as evil for the Son of Man's sake." Now, that S. Peter had, in the name of all, confessed," Thou art the Christ of God," He told them (it seems for the first time) plainly ; " * The Sou of Man must suffer many things, and be re- jected of the elders and chief priests and scribes, and be slain and be raised the third day." And '■ S. Luke Y. 35, S. Mark ii. 20, S. Matt. ix. 15. s S. Luke vi. 22. t lb. ix. 22. a corruftion of the Gospel of Glirid. 1;' when Peter had deprecated this, and received that severe rebuke, as doing the part of the Evil one, and " "savouring not the things that be of God, but the things that be of men," then, lest we should think that He said this to Apostles only, " " He called the ijeople with His disciples," and said to them, this about the cross, and added that aweful sanction,'""' What shall it profit a man, if he shall gain the whole world, and lose his own soul ? or what shall a man give in exchange for his soul ? ' ' and then, " Whoso shall be ashamed of Me and of My words in this sinful and adulterous generation, of him also shall the Son of Man be ashamed, when He Cometh in the glory of the Father and of the holy Angels." the horrible woe of him, from whom Christ, our only hope, shall turn away His Face in that Day ! Is there then no escape from it ? Did our Lord, the Truth, mean what He said ? Let me ask you an opposite question. Did our Lord, being God, be- come Man, only that His disciples should lead as easy lives as they can, multiply to themselves as many comforts and luxuries as they can, say to our souls, with the rich man whose soul was that night demanded of him to give account of his stewardship, '"'Soul, take thine ease, eat, drink and be merry," so only that thou be not drunken? Is His law, " Thou canst not serve God and mammon," obsolete ? Or is what He declared impossible, be- come possible with time ? Are we to turn our Lord's Woes into Blesseds and His Blesseds into II S. Mark viii. 32» 33. ^ lb. 34. * lb. 36-38. " S. Luke xxii. 19. 14 Chvutlanify vufliont the Cross Woes, and still call ourselves His disciples ? Shall we say," ^ Blessed are ye that are rich :" " Blessed are ye that are full :" and, " Woe unto you that are poor : " " woe unto you that hunger now." It is what men's every day lives, what our boast that " we English understand our comforts, " what our self-gratulations seem to say. Can we persuade ourselves that our treasure is not, where our heart is ? or that our heart is not there, for which we toil. A heathen said, " The despot money com- mands or serves each^" It commands those who slave for it. We are not less its slaves, if we toil for it, to spend on ourselves, our comforts and our luxuries. If we cannot find one word of our Lord's to excuse our living for this world, and hoping to gain heaven, how did they understand Him, to whom He spake or revealed Himself ? Let us ask him, men's favourite Apostle, because, while he teaches that we are " justified by faith," they hide from themselves, that he speaks not of an inactive faith but of a "faith that worketh by love." What didst thou, Paul, understand by this metaphor, which men satisfy themselves with calling a meta- phor because they do not like its meaning ? What didst thou understand by this doctrine of the cross, thou who dost tell us, that thou didst " de- termine" to know nothing but Jesus Christ, and Him crucified ?" Didst thou live to the world or to Him Who died for thee ? " God forbid," he y S. Luke vii. 20, 21, 24, 25. '^ Imperat aut servit regina pecunia ciiique. ^ 1 Cor. ii. 2. a corruption of the Gospel of ClirUt. 15 says'', " that I should glory save in the cross of our Lord Jesus Christ, whereby the world is crucified to me, and I unto the world." In the cross of Christ the world was crucified to him and was dead ; it had no power over him to hold him, for it was dead : it had no attractions for him, no winningness to him, for to him it was a corpse. And he too was crucified to the world on that same cross. He could, like his Lord, embrace the world with outstretched arms, in that large heart, but not with any longing for it, save to win it to his Lord, He was " co-crucified (aweaTavpco/jiai) with Christ," and had no will, no longing, no affections, no love for it, but Christ's : he heard not its re- vilings ; he heeded not its praises ; for he was dead to it. '"^All which it loved was a cross unto him, the delights of the flesh, honours, riches, vain praises of men : all which it counted a cross, to that he clave, to that he was nailed : that he em- braced with his whole heart." His former self was dead. " I have been and am crucified with Christ ; it is no longer I that live but Christ liveth in me." He was dead to all besides ; he felt them not, heeded them not, cared not for them, any more than one dead ; all of himself was dead and gone ; his human passions were nailed to the cross of Christ, and were dead; "dead," says a father'', " were pleasure and pain and wrath and fear and timidity and vehement emotion and pride and rash- ness, and memory of injuries, and envy and self- •> Gal. vi. 14. e S. Bern, de Quadr. Serm. \ii. n. 1. 0pp. i. 833. d S. Greg. Nyss. in Cant. Horn. xv. Tom. i. p. 695. 16 Chr 'upturn it}i ivithoiit the Cross defence, and covetousness or any other affection which defiles the soul — He had stripped off all which was not in Christ, and his life was Christ, Who was Sanctification and Purity and Immorta- lity and Light and Truth." "Not I live, but Christ liveth in me." Christ wrought all his works in him ; Christ spake by his tongue, so that he spake those fiery words of persuasive burning love ; Christ was the Heart of that vast heart which embraced all, Jew and heathen, those who were won, and those who could be won, and those who could not yet be won, by and to the love of Christ, breathing forth the fire of Divine love, with which he was himself kindled. Christ in him made known in all the world the riches of the mys- tery of the faith in Him ; Christ filled up in His servant " ^ what was yet lacking of His own Suf- ferings for His Body's sake, which is the Church;" those sufferings which He willed should be endured in His members for His members, that so His own meritorious Sufferings might reach unto all those for whom He died. "To him to live was Christ." Christ was the source of his spiritual life ; Christ was, within him, the perpetual maintainer of his life ; Christ was the Pattern and Exemplar of his life; Christ was the end and object and sub- stance of his life ; Christ was in all things the mainspring of his life, the informer of his words, the inworker of his acts, the endurer of his suffer- ings, the instrengthener against temptation by His grace and gracious Presence ; in A^^iom he strove according to His working. Who worked in him e Col. i. 25. a corruption, of the Gospel of Christ. 17 in might Divine. And so, since Christ lived in him and to him to live was Christ, " to die was gain;" for the persecutor's sword was the finisher of his toils, yielding him up to Him, for Whom and in Whom and by Whom he lived. Does this life, this death, belong to Paul alone ? What saith he to those whom he had won to Christ? '"'In Christ Jesus I have begotten you through the Gospel ; wherefore, I beseech you, be ye imita- tors of me." "Be ye," he says who was crucified with Christ, "^be ye imitators of me, as I also of Christ." Nay, he says of those new converts to the faith, "^ye also became imitators of us and of the Lord." How? In our Lord's exceptional presence at the marriage feast, or in eating with publicans and sinners ? Perhaps in this too, if so they might win them to Christ; but what is re- corded is, that they received the word " in much affliction, with joy in the Holy Ghost." As the Apostles departed from the presence of the Council, rejoicing that they were counted worthy to suffer shame for His Name', so to these, things grievous became joyous ; grievous to the bodily frame, with spiritual joy, " joy in the Holy Ghost." Yet these were no exceptional Christians; "model Christians" only in that they were models for others to fol- low, in that from " them the word sounded out to others." Yet these had been converts, converts from the ordinary heathen vices. " Ye turned to God from idols to serve the living and true God." How ? Amid self-indulgence, the pomps and vani- f 1 Cor. iv. 15, 16. s lb. xi. 1. ^ \ Thess. i. 6. i Acts V. 14. 18 . Christianity ■without the Cross ties of tlie world ? No, but with one longing expectation to see Him, to Whom they owed their all, to wait the return of Him Who was crucified for them, Whose cross thev, like Simon of Cyrene, bare after Him. " To wait for His Son from hea- ven. Whom He raised from the dead, Jesus which delivered us from the wrath to come." This was the common lot of Christians then, "J Ye became imitators of the Churches of God, which in Judea are in Christ Jesus." Wherein? That they suffered. "For," he adds, "ye have suffered like things of your countrymen, even as they have of the Jews." As he says to another Church; "''To you it is given not only to believe in Him, but also" — What is this gift, this grant bestowed by God's love upon them? How should we fill this up ? The last thing, I fear, with which we should fill it up, would be that which he adds, " but also to suffer with Him." But these, you may say, were days of persecu- tion, from which, by God's mercy, we are exempt. It is, I trust, " in God's mercy." For look at any picture of post- Apostolic times, in which Christians were again braced up by one of the ten persecu- tions ; they who were such as we mostly are, in ease or worldliness or self-indulgence, apostatised. And apostacy involved the formal renunciation and blaspheming of Christ, Who died for us. But the most commonplace Christian life was not, S. Paul says, without crucifixion. All was "with Christ ;" all, past and future. With Him we hope to live for ever, but not otherwise than if we first J 1 Thess. ii. 14. k p^ii. i. 29. a corruption of the Gospel of Christ. 19 die and remain dead with Him. "If we be dead with Christ, we believe that we shall also live with Him." In S. Paul's language^, we "co-died," "were co-crucified, were co-interred, were co-implanted in His death;" with Him, "God co-crucified" co-raised us," " co-seated us in heavenly places with Him." Are we to be joined with Christ in everything which is not of us or by us, and ouly not with Christ in that which is our own, which it is in our power to give or to refuse ? Not so. S. Paul says, ""'It is a faithful saying, 'If we co-die, we shall also co-live : if we endure, we shall also co-reign." We have heard what crucifixion was to S. Paul, a living death, death to himself, and life in Christ. Think you that he would use the image of some easy painless process ? Would you ? Could you gravely say to one another, that you were crucified to any- thing? Yet S. Paul, having arrayed over against each other the two opposed armies, the works of the flesh and the works of the Spirit, sums up — " " They that are Christ's have crucified the flesh with the affections and lusts." Granted that by the flesh the Apostle means the ill deeds of the flesh, yet see the completeness of the death in which they are held. Not one ill-deed, but all ; not one disposition to sin, but all ; not one concupiscence, but all ; nailed, motionless, powerless to the cross of Christ. "We then,'' says a father", " crucify the 1 Rom. vi. 4, 5, 6. viii.. 17, Gal. ii. 20. Eph. ii. 5, 6, Col. ii. 12, 13, iii. 1, 2 Tim. ii. 11. See Dr. Pusey's Scriptural Doctrine of Holy Baptism p. 171. "^2 Tim. ii. 11, 12. " Gal. v. 24. » S. Greg, in Job c. 8. L. viii. c. xliv. n. 73. 0pp. i. 277. He begins, " Contrariwise, it is well said of the elect by Paul " They that are Christ's &c." c 2 20 Christianity ivithout the Cross flesh witli the affections and lusts, if we in such wise restrain appetite, as therewith to seek nothing from the glory of the world. For he who macerates his body but pants after honours, crucifies the flesh ; but by concupiscence he lives to the world yet more, because, often through a phantom of holiness, he, being unworthy, gains some place of rule, whereto he would attain by no labour, unless he had some shew of virtue." Is this the glowing language of S. Paul only ? Is it only his language, to whom on his wonderful conversion, which we are to commemorate to- morrow, Christ Himself shewed how great things he must suffer for His Name's sake ? Is it only a transcript of his life who was " in labours more abundant, in deaths oft ? " Will any other Apostle of our Master, Who was crucified for us, give us easier terms ? You would scarce expect it of him, our Lord's brother, whose knees were hardened like a camel's, being bent evermore in prayer to God for forgive- ness for his people^. Certainly his idea of the " summum bonum" is different from that of Hea- then philosophy, nor could it ever occur to any one apart from Christ and His Cross. It would not occur to us, now living in the midst of, and boasting ourselves of the Gospel of Christ. "iMy brethren, count it all joy," the sum of joy, com- prising in itself all other joys, " when ye fall into divers trials." And these were no passing trials, P Hegesippus in Eusebius (H. E. ii. 23.) who says that Heg. related most accurately the history of S. James. 1 S. Jas. i. 2. a corruption of the Gospel of Christ. 21 but enduring. For their benefit was endurance. They were to test endurance to the utmost, and yield the soul perfected for '""the crown of life," which the Lord hath promised to them that love Him. The joy of S. James is the exultation of S.Paul; "^yea, we glory in tribulations," and on the self -same ground, that the Christian's joy Cometh from being perfected by the Cross. " Tri- bulation worketh patience, and patience experience, and experience hope, and hope maketh not asham- ed." For both Apostles repeated their Master's lesson, "* Blessed are they that mourn; for they shall be comforted ; " " Blessed are they which are per- secuted for righteousness sake ; for theirs is the kingdom of heaven." Whence the Martyr's cry so often was " '' Thanks be to God." But what of the opposite condition which men now count so happy ? " The rich man," he says "", " exulteth in that wherein is humiliation." He as- sumes it as a thing known or which ought to be known to them : " Friendship with the world is enmity with Grod;" " Whoso would be the friend of the world is made"' " by the very fact, by being so minded, {KaOlararai) " an enemy of God." He that loveth the one, as our Lord saith, despiseth the other. Such are already " adulterous souls," fallen away from God Who hath made them His own, and giving themselves over to His enemy. r lb. i. 12. 8 iiom. V. 3. t g, ^att. v. 4—6. " " The Christian being condemned giveth thanks." Tertull. Apol. c. 1. p. 4, Oxf. Tr. and note m. and Rninart, Acta Mart. ^ S. James i. 10, supplying Kavxti-Tai as in Phil. iii. 19, "whose glory is in their shame." Alford. ^ S, Jas^. iv. 4. 22 Christianity without the Cross Or ask S. Peter, him wlio would have dissuaded his Master from the Cross, him, who was drawn by love of his Master to the judgement-hall, and there cowered before a little maid and denied Him, to whom, our Lord, fore signifying his death, said, " Follow thou Me." Wherein did he understand that following to be ? For our Lord says' to us, as to him, "Follow Me." '"'If when ye do well and suffer, ye take it patiently, this is acceptable with God; for even thereunto were ye called." — called whereto? to " suffer patiently for well doing." Suffering he declares to be the very object of our calling, even as S. Paul and Barnabas " con- firmed the souls of the disciples in every city" where they had preached, telling them that "^"we must through much tribulation enter into the kingdom of God." But S. Peter assigns, further, the ground of our being so called, because we are members of a thorn-crowned Head; ^^ because Christ also suf- fered for us, leaving us a copy," {vTroypa/x/nov) as children copy line by line and stroke by stroke, that we should follow close upon His steps, marking them, placing our feet as nearly as we can to them ; and those steps were, in that sad road to Calvary, tracked in His own Blood, shed for us. Again, see how close he brings us to our Lord. "''Christ then having suffered in the flesh," (as he had said, " Christ died for our sins, the Just for the unjust" to bring us to God,) "arm your- selves likewise with the same mind" — "arm your- selves," not assuredly for a listless peace; "with the same mind as Christ" when He suffered; "for ^ 1 S. Pet. ii. 20. y Acts xiy. 22. ^ 1 S. Pet. iv. 1, 2. a corruptio7i of the Gospel of Christ. 23 he that hath suffered in the flesh hath ceased from sin." We, being members of Christ, are counted as having ourselves suffered with Christ, " that we should no lono-er live the rest of our life to the lust of men, but to the will of God;" that the one object of our lives, our affections, our new regenerate being, should be the will of God. The thought of Christ crucified, the sharing of His sufferings, not without us only, but within us, is the panoply of Christians. Or look at that say- ing, "If the righteous scarcely (with difficulty) be saved," and that, in view of judgement through which he has to pass and to be sifted therein. Surely this does not speak of an easy, good-natured, effortless life, but a life passed, as he also says, ""If ye call upon Him as Father, Who without respect of persons judgeth every man's work, pass the time of your sojourning here with fear," and that the more, he adds, on account of the exceed- ing preciousness of the price of our redemption, the precious Blood of Christ. We have to give account, not of our lives only, but of the terrible ingratitude of despising our Redeemer. Once more, let us ask him, the beloved disciple, the Apostle of love, who lay on his Master's breast and drank there the streams of wisdom and of love, he who speaks so much of the love of God towards us ; of the propitiation for our sins ; of the life in God begun in us ; of the beatific vision of God. What saith he ? " ''He that saith that he abideth in Him ought himself also to walk even as He a lb. i. 17. M S. Johnii. 6. 24 Christianity without the Cross walked." " ^ If any man love the world, the love of the Father is not in him." "Abide in Me," Jesus says, "and I in you." "Abide in Me," of Whom ye have been made members, by faith and love and obedience, and I will abide in you by My grace, and the continual influx of My Spirit. If then we abide in Him, we are to walk as He walked. We all have an idea that we are to keep, in a general way, God's commandments, not to swear, not to lie, not to commit certain excesses. But does this suffice, to walk as Christ walked ? Is this mere negative or limited Christianity to walk as He, Whom we own as our Exemplar, walked? " What," says an approved writer'', "is to walk as He walked, but to despise all prosperous things, which He despised; to fear nothing adverse which He bare; to do cheerfully what He did ; to teach to do what He commanded; to hope what He promised; to follow v^here He went before ; to bestow benefits on the ungrateful also ; not to requite ill-wishers as they deserve ; to pray for enemies, to love the good, to pity the perverse, to invite those averted (from God), to receive lovingly those converted; to endure patiently the treacherous and the proud ; to die to one's own sins as He for our's; for as one dead in the body detracts from none, injures none, despises none, corrupts, envies, flatters, courts none, so they who have crucified their flesh with the affections and lusts, living to God, live not to these or the like sins." "What must he do," says <= 1 S. Jolmii. 15. ^ Pomerius de vit. contempl. ii. 21. (in S. Prosper 0pp. T. ii.) abridged. a corruption of the Gospel of Ghrid. 25 a father % "to whom the great name of Christian has been vouchsafed? What else than diligently judge in himself thoughts, words, deeds, whether each of these look to Christ or are alien from Him ?" You would not expect relaxation from S. Jude, whose whole Epistle is one upbraiding of the sins of false teachers and relapsers. But among their very heavy sins, it is startling to our self-indulgent age, to find the habit of our times, "*^ feeding them- selves without fear." He does not mention glut- tony or excess in meat or wine, but that, in sup- plying the wants of nature, they fed without reverence and awe, lest they should do amiss. So did the goodly company of the Apostles inculcate with one voice, a life to be led above the world, contrary to the world and conformed to our Redeemer, as the way of salvation. We have been in the habit of speaking dispa- ragingly of a former generation, which spoke much of our Lord as our Example ; we thought it cold ; we thought much of our revived preaching of the Cross and of the Crucified. I fear, that much of the reli- gion of the present day has been rather the belief of a doctrine, a revelation, than a personal belief in Him our Redeemer ; that believing, so far truly, our redemption, many have forgotten Him as an Example. Could we take up with such poor mea- sures of attainment, if we seriously thought of Him as the likeness which we were to copy, which was, by His Spirit, to be formed in us ? Look at them e S. Greg. Nyss. de pex-f. Christiani forma. 0pp. iii. 296. f S. Jude 12. 26 Christianity without the Gross one by one. We might think perhaps, that we had something of meekness or gentleness, or charity, or peaceableness ; or, more probably, that we were not flagrantly the very opposite; but meekness of Christ, long-suffering of Christ, lowliness of Christ, gentleness of Christ, self-sacrificing love of Christ, self-consuming zeal of Christ, burning thirst of Christ for saving souls, hunger of Christ to do His Father's will, unwearied tenderness of Christ, — we see you in His wearisome life on earth, but where are those, who set themselves, in the full endeavour of their souls, to copy these in them- selves ? Are men really disciples of Christ, or of some phantom Christ ? Him, God-Man, Who was cruci- fied for them, or a mythical Christ, the creature of their own imaginings ? Christ, to Whose likeness they are to be conformed, or a Christ, such an one as themselves, formed in their own image ? " One stood before S. Martin, (S. Martin himself related its) enveloped in a glittering radiance, clad in royal robes, crowned with a golden and jewelled diadem, with face serene and bright looks, and said to him, " I am Christ. I am now descending upon earth, and I willed first to manifest myself to thee. Ac- knowledge me whom thou seest, I am Christ." Martin at first gazed at him in silence : then, taught by God, answered, " Jesus, the Lord, an- nounced not, that He should come in glittering clothing and radiant with a diadem. I will not believe that Christ is come, save in that state and form in which He suifered, save with the shew of 6 Life of S. Martin c. 25, in Church of the Fathers, c. 21. fin. a corruption of the Gospel of Christ. 27 the "Wounds of the Cross." Forthwith the Evil one (for it was he) vanished. " Many spirits are abroad, more are issuing from the pit," says the relater •> ; " the credentials which they display are the precious gifts of mind, beauty, richness, depth, originality. Christian, look hard at them with Martin in silence, and then ask for the print of the nails." ** ' Smooth open ways, good store ; A creed for every time and age, By Mammon's touch new moulded o'er and o'er. No cross, no war to wage ;" — Are these the prints of the nails ? Is this the Creed in the Crucified ? Shall we say to our Lord when He comes down to be our Judge, when we shall behold Him, Whom we, by our sins, have pierced ? " True ! Lord, I denied myself nothing for Thee ; the times were changed and J. could not but change with them ; I ate and drank, for Thou too didst eat and drink with the publicans and sinners ; I did not give to the poor ; but I paid what I was compelled to the poor- rate, of the height of which I complained ; I did not take in little children in Thy Name, but they were provided for ; they were sent, severed indeed from father or mother, to the poor-house, to be taught or no about Thee, as might be ; I did not feed Thee when hungry ; political economy forbade it ; but I increased the labour-market with the manufacture of my luxuries ; I did not visit Thee when sick, but the parish doctor looked in on his h J. H. I^ewman lb. p. 414. fin. ed. 1836. 'John Keble, Lyra Apostolica no. xcviii. Dissent p. 121. 28 Christianity ivithoiit the Cross ill-paid rounds ; I did not clotlie Thee when naked ; I could not afford it, the rates were so high , but there was the workhouse for Thee to go to ; I did not take Thee in as a stranger : but it was provided that Thou mightest go to the ' casual-ward ^. ' Had I known that it was Thou " — " ' And He shall say, Forasmuch as thou didst it not to one of the least of these, thou didst it not to Me." Many of you, my sons, are provided with super- fluities. You have not to stint yourselves as to the pleasures of your age. Day by day, I suppose, passes with all conveniences of life, or amusement or some self-indulgences, which though not directly ^ I said this, not of Oxford nor of any particular place, but of the system. The poor-law, nearly 40 years ago, "was reduced into a sort of police- system, on the principle " if a man will not work, neither let him eat. " It might have been, and the writer hoped that it would have been, supplemented by Christian cha- rity. (See Pusey's Parochial Sermons Yol. III. p. 143. "The Yalue and Sacredncss of Suffering," published in 1841.) As it is, reliance on the Poor-law interferes with Christian charity, offers, in large towns, a mode of relief which the better poor would starve rather than accept ; and in time* of suffering, as of an epidemic, offers relief in a way which degrades the poor in their own eyes, and of their compeers, if they accept it. What else than a police-law is it, to separate husband and wife from each other and from their children ? If the poor, like the lower animals, needed only food and warmth, the poor-house system provides these, I doubt not. But the poor have souls, and loving hearts, more loving than many rich, and to separate those whom God has joined, as the condition of supplying them with necessa- ries, is un-Christian and anti-Christian. " I would not be sepa- rated from my old missus," was the remark of an aged peasant, at the time of the change in the law, which many an aching heart has repeated since. I fear that, in the great Day, many even kindly people will find that reliance on the Poor-law has steeled their heart against Christ. ^ S. Matt. xxV. 45. a corruptloji of the Gospel of Christ. 29 sinful are rather injurious. If our Lord was to come now, in how many do you think that you could tell Him that you had fed Him, clothed Him, supplied Him when sick ? Some, I fear, could not say, that they had bestowed as much on Christ, as upon their dogs. But if, to be saved, we must be disciples of our crucified Redeemer ; and if, to be His disciples, we must imitate Him and take up our cross daily ; and if, of those whom we see around us, the great mass seems to think of nothing less that taking up any cross, nay rather boast that they have no cross to bear ; who, except the poor, on whom the cross is, any how, laid, "who then shall be saved?" "0 Lord, Thou knowest ! " "The Judge of all the Earth will do right ! " God mercifully lays on the cross, in ways which we know not. Others, it may be, building on the True and Only Founda- tion, which is Jesus Christ, may be building thereon wood, hay, stubble, which shall be burned up, S. Paul tells, in the fire of the great Day, but themselves be saved, yet so as by fire°\" Be not curious about others, but in God's longsuffering save thou thyself. Look up to Him the Good Shepherd Who laid down His life for the sheep, and pray Him with His pierced Hands to loose the thorns which hold thee, and to lay thee upon His shoulders : yea He will carry thee in His bosom. Ye would not be unlike Him, Who loved you and gave Himself for you; you would not, now at least, that it has been set before you, however little you ^ See Pusey's Lenten Sermons. Scrm. v. " The losses of the saved" pp. 89—106. 30 Christianity tvithout the Cross may have before thouglit of even venturing to imi- tate Him. Yet such is your calling. " "^ Christianity is the imitation of God ; " conformity to God made Man, to Whom you have been conformed ; with Whom you have been made one; your oneness with Whom has been so often renewed ; for in the Holy Communion (as is so often repeated to you) if we partake worthily, " we dwell in Christ, and Christ in us : we are one with Christ, and Christ with us." Any self-denial, however simple, done for love of your Redeemer, is accepted by Him as a bearing of His Cross. Self-denials which you, many of you, exercise for a corruptible crown, might set you in the way, at least, not to lose the incorruptible. Fulness of bread which "bankereth out the wits," dulls also the affections towards God and man. He, to whom Jesus manifested Himself on the way, to whom by a wondrous miracle He had revealed Himself ; He, the chosen vessel, the teacher of the nations; whose love suffering only kindled; "in la- bours more abundant, in stripes above measure, in deaths oft;" who rejoiced to be "the off-scourings of the world and to die daily," so that he might win any to Christ ; to whom daily sufferings were more than his daily bread, "the marks of the Lord Jesus" on his waled body, but who was thereby " a spec- tacle to the world, to angels and to men," how did he fight, how did he win his crown ? "I run," he answers you°, " not as uncertainly," without any definite object, " so fight I, not as striking the " S. Greg. Nyss. de Profess. Christiana. Oi^'p. iii. 271. o 1 Cor. ix. 26. a corruption of the Gospel of Christ. 31 air; but I bring under (maltreat) my body and bring it into subjection." To what end ? to be abundantly rewarded for liis abundant sufferings? No, but, " lest when I have preached to others — filled the whole world with the preaching of Christ and won to Him countless souls, " I myself should be a castaway." If Paul, being what he was, so feared, what shall we say ? Are we wiser than S. Paul, or have we ceased to be disciples of Him, Who foretold, that "when the Bridegroom," Him- self, shall be taken away, " then shall My disciples fast in those days ; " Who instructs us how to fast, as well as how to pray and to give alms^? Are we (it is a terrible thing to say, but this is what it comes to) are we wiser than Christ ? We are to-day at the vestibule of those days wherein, bearing the cross of this yearly abstinence, we are, if we are His disciples, to follow Him Who for our sakes did fast forty days and forty nights, that so " by continual mortifying our corrupt affec- tions we may be buried with Him ; and through His Cross and Passion may be brought to the glory of His Resurrection." Three weeks hence, you will plead that fasting to Him Who for our sakes did fast forty days and forty nights, and pray Him that after His likeness you too "may use such abstinence, that your flesh being subdued to the spirit, you may ever obey His godly motions in righteousness and true holi- ness." Let not your prayers be a witness against you. He does not put hard things upon you. He p S. Matt. Yi. 16. 32 Christianity loitJiout the Cross, ^c. Who accepts tlie cup of cold water will accept petty self-denials. Self-indulgence is a hard master, not Jesus. Vice wears the body, self-denial braces it. Sin is an exacting tyrant, the service of God is perfect freedom. Give yourselves anew to Him, Who gave Him- self for you. He grudged not for you one drop of His Heart's Blood: grudge not to Him the price of His Blood, yourselves. Think of that place around the eternal Throne, which He by that Blood has prepared individually for you. Jesus will impart to your petty cross some of the virtue of His Saving Cross. He will make any hardness sweet to you, Who is Himself all sweetness and every pleasureable delight. He will give you His own love and *' The heart that loveth knoweth well, What Jesus 'tis to love." NOTE. On '' Modern Christianity a civilised Heathenism P The allusion to the little book "Modern Christianity a civilised Heathenism ^^ at the beginning of my sermon, perhaps requires some explanation. I alluded to it, because I was told the minds of some were disturbed by it, not in a healthy way (which the writer intended and it might have done and, I hope, will do with others) to set them looking whether they had not been making, in different degrees, a compromise with the world or worldliness, but, according to the form of the fiction, whether, I suppose, real civilisation and real Christianity were opposed to one another; whether a Christian must become "^ the greatest nuisance to meet,^' "must make an ass of himself, make himself ridiculous in the eyes of worldly people — in the opinion of modern society — every time he speaks or acts,^' and " be hated and laughed at for his eccentricities." Some perhaps have been led to the terrible question, "Is Christianity a failure?" Any how, "does it bear evidence in itself, as it exists now, that it is Divine ? " The writer is, I fear, in some degree responsible for raising this question, by the form in which he has cast his book, the subject of which is the unpersuasiveness or positive oflfensiveness of the life of worldly persons and especially of worldly Clergy. For had he adopted a title, which would have expressed his meaning more exactly, * Much modern Christianity ; " — or " Fashionable Christi- ' pp. 118, 119, 73. D 34 NOTE. anitj," or " The Christianity of the worldly/' or " of the wealthy^' or "of the great" — "a civilised Heathenism," he would have avoided raising those other questions, and liis book would only have been an application of our Blessed Lord's warning, "How hardly shall they that are rich enter into the kingdom of heaven." For, of course, "fashionable Christianity" is but an infinitesimal portion even of " Modern Christianity." *' Fashionable Christianity" may be, and too much of it, alas ! I fear is, utterly false and hollow, and yet its false- ness and hollowness has nothing to do with the truth of Christianity, to which it is a contradiction and which condemns it. It is a practical corruption of Christian- ity, which civilly sets aside the teaching of the Gospel, not openly opposing it, treating our Lord's words with irreverent courtesy (as it would treat its fellow men's), yet, none the less, emptying them of their meaning. Nega- tively, as far as the lives of its adherents are conspicuous, it involves the loss of that evidence which Christians would, if they acted up to the Gospel, silently, unconsciously, but unmistakeably give, and which, the early Christians did give to the heathen, among whom their lot was cast, that " ~ the Gospel is a power of God unto_ salvation." When our missionaries in the neighboui'hood of Tinnevelly sepa- rated their converts from their heathen countrymen, their countrymen saw, in the diiference of their lives, that there was something superhuman in Christianity and asked to be taught it. Eeport says that the Japanese Embassadors came to England, with the thought that it might be well to introduce Christianity among the Japanese, and that, seeing what they did see on the surface, they were deterred from it. Whether there be any foundation for this or no, it is only what one should expect, if they had. We have our idols as well as they ; we have, too often, a god, who is not the true God, as well as they. Mammon is not the less worshipped, because his image is not visibly set up - Rom. i. 16. NOTE. 35 in his temples ; the god of this world is not less people's god, because his worship is in the heart ; the idolatry is not the less real, because it is the hidden mainspring of men's acts ; its icy touch is not the less felt, because it is unseen. Mammon has his servants, God has His. But unhappily, the service of Mammon is open ; the service of God is for the most part out of sight ; and one cannot but think, that the sight of our metropolis would give but an unfavourable impression of the power of Christianity over the hearts of men. God Himself does oftentimes and in many ways speak to the souls of those who know Him not, but argument in proof that the Gospel is a revelation from God will have little effect in converting unbelievers, unless they see, in some way, the fruits of the Gospel in a life above nature. A religion above nature ought to produce a life above na- ture. Divine grace, which our Lord promises to those who are His, is supernatural : every action of grace on the soul is a miracle ; the conversion of one dead in sin is a greater miracle than the raising of one phj-sically dead : whence also our Lord said to His Apostles, " ^ He that believeth on Me, shall do greater things than these." But the lives, which what is called " the world '' lives, have too often the appearance of being sweet, amiable, kindly, natural lives : yet not lives (if men are married) remarkably above nature, not apparently the lives of those whose " * citizenship is in heaven," But the superficial only will judge from the surface. When the historian Niebuhr was asked in 1827 about the state of the German universities and especially of Bonn where he resided, he said to the effect ; " You must not judge from what you see ; you will see students lounging about in the market-place with their long pipes and their dogs ; the students who are in their upper rooms at their work (which he said, were two thirds) you do not see." Much more in Christianity, which is an inward power of 3 S. Jolm xiv. 12. " Phil. iii. 20. 36 NOTE. God ! The outward acts must^ unless a person be called to a higlier lifcj be^ to tlie outward eye, much the same ; the soul of the acts, whether what is done is done to the glory of God, or for self- exaltation, or for some secular end, is, except on long experience or from some accidental gleam of the inner self, unseen except by God. "The good housemaid," Nicole says, " sweeps the room, and prays : the good watchmaker makes watches, and prays : " and so on. Outwardly they would be doing the same acts ; the difference would be seen in the long run, by the con- scientiousness, with which they did them. The street- sweeper, who, while he swept his crossing, was thinking of the golden streets of the heavenly Jerusalem, would, outwardly, only sweep it more carefully. The slaves whom S. Paul exhorted, "^obey your masters according to the flesh with fear and trembling, with singleness of heart, as unto Christ, not with eye-service as men-pleasers, but as the servants of Christ, doing the will of God from the heart, — with good will doing service as unto the Lord and not to men," doubtless did the same outward acts, the in- ward motive was discoverable only by those who looked carefully ; others would say of such, *' ^ he is a good man, only he is a Christian." Perhaps the subject may also be somewhat confused by the absence of any statement, what is " civilisation." Not the condition of civilised nations in general; not their objects, or pursuits ; it is nothing outward ; it is not litera- ture, nor philosophy, not the perfection of mechanical arts, nor the multiphcation of luxuries or comforts. We have no poet to surpass Homer ; yet his age was a very simple one : " mechanical arts aud merchandise flourish," Bacon tells us, " in the decay of a nation : " if luxuries were its " summum bonum," Sybaris would be without a rival, and Apicius its ideal : we have not yet discovered by what mechanical art the enormous monoliths of Thebes were removed from the quarries of Syene ; it used to be a ques- 5 Eph. vi. 5-7. 6 Tert. Apol. c. 3, p. 8. Oxf, Tr. NOTE. 37 tion liow our ancestors could raise Stoneheuge. Abstract- ing ourselves for a time from tlie actual condition of civilised nations^ we should not doubt that " civilisation " means that which makes us men civilised. We learnt in our grammars the heathen notion of it, that it was " ^ in- genuas didicisse fideliter artes/^ in which, great emphasis must be laid upon the ^'fideliter/' for it was a contemporary of the poet who would have fed his lampreys with the slave who broke a crystal vessel. The young slave only asked Augustus for some other death. The master's pu- nishment for the intended murder was only to have his crystals broken and his fishpond filled up ^. " Manners maketh man '' may, I suppose, represent our modern idea of it ; only that " manners " must be taken in a broad and deep meaning, including the whole relation and intercourse of man with man. Improved medical science does not authoritatively discountenance the savagery of vivisection, and this as perpetrated even by women-dissectors. But in this sense civilisation will only be an outward as- pect of Christianity; it cannot be opposed to it^. Any peasant, who cannot read, will, if he be indeed a Christian, be distinguished by courtesy, gentleness, refinement of feeling and manners, even tone of voice^ from one who is not a Christian. E-efined manners may be a mere out- side ; the manners of the world may be soulless, like the beauty of a corpse, '^ere the first day of death is fled;" with ^^its mild angelic air, the rapture of repose that's there." The beauty may not last; but it is the beauty, left by the departed soul. But the beauty of the "manners of the world" is, in its basis. Christian. Let any one in his mind go over its instances, I think, he may see in them the Apostle's rule ; " ^ in honour preferring one 7 Sencea de ira iii. 40. 8 I would venture to recommend tlie writer who holds British civilisation to be as corrupt as the heathen to read DoUinger llcidenthum und Judenthum. ■' " If Christianity has any thing to do with Christ, Civilisation must ever be its deadliest foe." p. G9. ^ Rom. xii. 10. 38 NOTE. another;'^ ""follow after — love, patience, meekness;" " ^the servant of the Lord must not strive, but be gentle unto all, patient;" "put them in mind to speak evil of no man, shewing all meekness to all men." It used to strike me, in young days, how the preference of others to self, the great shock which it evidently was to give pain to any one, the consideration of every one's feelings, the thinking of others rather than one's-self, the pains that no one should feel neglected, the deference shewn to the weak or the aged, the unconscious courtesy to those secularly in- ferior, were the beauty of the refined woi'ldly manners of the " old school ;" that it was acting upon Christian principle, and that if in any case it became soulless, as apart from Christianity, the beautiful form was there, into which real life might re-enter. Any thing in society, which is contrary to Christianity, is contrary also to " good man- ners," unless indeed any society is itself avowedly un- christian. The use of the word " world " may also perplex some. " The world " may be used to designate those who " "* have their portion in this life," for those out of Christ. Yet however miserably large may be the number of those who are going on the broad road, however many may bear the name of Christian without the reality, "^the Lord knoweth those who are His;" the Searcher of hearts alone can sepa- rate the sheep from the goats. " Some men's sins," the Apostle says^, "are open beforehand, going before to judgment." From such the Apostle bids us separate ourselves ; and it is no good sign, that if men are e. g. notoriously " defilers of their neighbour's wives," such, if they have political influence, or wit, or wealth, or any other secular recommendation, are courted by what is called " the world." But these are few. Even these pro- bably would respect one who avoided intercourse with " 1 Tim. vi. 11. ^ 2 Tim. ii. 24. * Ps. xvii. 14. ^ 2 Tim. ii. 19. ^ 1 Tim. V. 24. NOTE. 39 them. But the representation in " Modern Christianity " that a consistent Christian (Hving, it is assumed, in ordi- nary society) must be hated by all, with whom he comes in contact, assumes an universality of evil. The writer says in his own person ; " ' I challenge the reader of any Gospel or Epistle in the Scripture, to produce one single page which does not more or less distinctly set forth the truth, that to be hated and persecuted and ridiculed from morning till night by all the world, is, in all ages, ancient and modern alike, the eternal immutable unfailing test of the Christianity that comes from Christ." " ^ We find it inconvenient to proclaim oiu* religion, wherever we go, to be marked men in every circle wherein we move, to expose ourselves to hatred persecution and ridicule, whenever we come in contact with our neighbours." The language implies that there is nothing which is not un- Christian and inimical to Christianity, and that we are the judges who are His and who not. Yet this, or the assumption of inconceivable "human respect" which would be ashamed of Christ and His words, lies as the basis of many of those contrasts, that a Christian must either separate himself from all intercourse with his fellow men, or be hated by them. " ^ While I see them (priests) smiling politely on sin, and caressed by those who would have spat on our Lord." It belongs to the fiction to make the defender of " Modern Christianity'^ argue in a very common-place way. The theory is, that the parson, who enters society, dismisses all thought of both his Baptismal and Oi^dination vows, or thinks every sort of self-indulgence which does not fla- grantly contradict both, compatible with both. On his own part, as the assailant, his idea of teaching seems to be that of a thunder or a hailstorm, and he certainly has not had present to his mind Moses' description " ^ my speech doth distil as the dew " or the " ^ here a little and there a little " of Isaiah. I should have thought that Clergy who might feel it to be a duty to go into society, would, with a little ' Pref: p. 8. « lb. p. 9. ''p. 140. ' Deut. x.xxii. 2. '^ Is. xxviii. 19. 40 NOTE. wisdom, have found no difficulty to sow seed at least in the hearts of individuals, to which God might " ^ give the in- crease/^ I do not remember the difficulty. Christianity has a great task before it, to make "'^the kingdoms of this world the kingdoms of our Lord and of His Christ : " but it is not because they are civilised, but because, retaining an outward civilisation, they are fast decaying and becoming uncivilised. Class is being array- ed against class, interest against interest; '' union '^ is be- coming fast a name for disunion and antagonism ; the elder of us have observed, for well-nigh forty years, the materials of a worse revolution than that of 1793 : yet Christianity has not " ^to fight tooth and nail with civilisa- tion, '' but by the grace of God to ensoul it. The anonymous writer dwells much and often on the evils caused by worldly clergy. I had hoped that this generation had passed away. I have not met with them. Only we need not be worldly, because a proportion of us has been well-endowed ; nor need we " make ourselves ridiculous " in order, by God's grace, to convert the world. The world respects those who are consistent and act on principle, even while they speak against it. In days relatively cold, Bp. Porteus remonstrated separately with three ladies of highest rank for the fashionable Sunday re- ceptions which they held weekly. All listened to him, though one only permanently abandoned them. Yet he was respected, not ridiculed, for his remonstrance. We have people's consciences with us, whether they hear or whether they forbear. As for our incomes, the question for our own souls is, not what we have, but what we do with it. It was said of a Bishop of London, before the income of his see was reduced, that he '' could not afford'' to become Archbishop of Canterbury, because so much of his income had been appropriated to works for God, in part for his poorer Clergy. Christianity has a side, which gains respect from those 3 1 Cor. iii. 6. ^ Rev. xi. 15. * p. 69. NOTE. 41 wlio are not themselves Christians. People admire what they do not follow. The new commandment is, that ye " love one another, as I have loved you/' with a self- sacrificing love. And this, whatever political economists may say, or however people may under false principles excuse themselves from giving to the poor, the world will appreciate. Indeed, it has often seemed strange to me how, even for this world only, the very wealthy so forego the love of their fellow beings and the happiness of bene- fitting them and the radiance of their smile of thankfulness, and can waste on dogs and horses or vanities of the world what might make them be, and be counted among the world's benefactors. I have thought that God allowed them to blind themselves, not willing that great things should be done to any end, except to His Glory. It would, for the wealthy, be a cheap way of gaining popularity. But any how obedience to the Gospel does make people popular. S. Anthony, the very ideal of an ascetic life and its great promoter, we are told by his biographer, when young, " made all to take delight in him." At this moment, one of the most popular names in England is that of one who gave very largely, in the hopes of improving the dwellings of the poor, the late Mr. Peabody. The most popular living Nobleman, probably, is one of the so-called Evangelical school, who has associated, not his name only, but himself with all sorts of works of piety and charity, and es- pecially in benefitting the poor, but has also acted con- spicuously in the state of life to which it pleased God to call him, his hereditary position as one of our Lawgivers, — Lord Shaftesbury. Of course there is the other side also. Some who hate religion, or strictness, or the Church, will ridicule, call names, slander, nay persecute, till they have tested a person's perseverance. But then, they will turn and respect a man the more, because he held on. The times of open persecution are not yet. Having mentioned these imperfections in "Modern Chris- tianity &c." it would be wrong not to say, that (personalities E 42 NOTE. and exaggerations ^ apart) tlie anonymous writer has been carrying on the same war against worldliness^ of which the terrible revolution of 1793 blew the first trumpet notes; which was carried on by all earnest men, but perhaps especially first by the pious Evangelicals; and then, simul- taneously with them but by a distinct action, by the Tractarians. He himself indeed accuses the Tractarians of having", "as if out of pure perversity and spite per- mitted^ their disciples to indulge in an almost unlimited amount of secularity/^ Whence he can have obtained this impression, I know not. I should have thought that if he read any of the writings of the Tractarians, he could not have said it. The old allegation against us was the very contrary, that we were too strict. I should have thought that our objection was, that the sphere of worldliness con- demned by the Evangelicals was too limited. However, his own positive pictures of what a Christian ought to be, and his statement of the witness borne by the prayers provided for us by the Church of England, are valuable and true. The penitential character of our Prayer-book was drawn out some 36 years ago by Isaac Williams, in a thoughtful essay in the Tracts for the times. The standard is high, but has, I trust, been in the way of being reali2;ed by many, of whom the world knows nothing. "^Without immediate reference to Christ, as to a personal guide standing by, no action is to be performed, no word spoken, no thought conceived." Translated into the old language, this is, "Live con- 1 e. g. " Christianity cannot exist in the empii-e of the intellect and the region of human prosperity, because it came on purpose to destroy them both," (rather " to sanctify both.") p. 46. Elsewhere however he says, "There is a variety of secular pursuits available," and reproaches us for om- ignorance of natm-al history, pp. 130, 131. His bete noire is the richer endowments of the Bishops and of a portion of the clergj'. 2 p, 29. 3 I suppose that by "pemiission" he means the maxims of their school, as expressed by their wi-itings. And yet he says not of them only, but of the Clergy generally, " Your preaclung is plain enough, and your Simday standard of Christian holiness all that can be desired." p. 64. ^ p. 23. NOTE. 43 stantly in the presence of God, '' and " pray without ceasing/' " ^ He wants your life, and the life of every creature for whom He died, to be given up without reserve to Him." In the Apostle's words, " Do all in the Name of the Lord Jesus." " ^ Christ was now to produce a form of testimony altogether new, a testimony real, ever present, personal, a testimony which should pro- claim the truth as plainly in modern Paris or London or Berlin as in Jerusalem or Galilee of old. His Spirit must linger here ; it must be manifesting Him with a brightness which cannot be hid, wherever His servants and children dwell." In our Lord's words, " Let your light so shine before men, that they may see your good works and glorify your Father which is in heaven." Thoughts such as these can never be misplaced, and I hope that they may, by God's grace, find entrance among those whom, without the condiment in which they are en- veloped, we could not have reached. I should be glad to think that they would reach some of the worldly, whom they are apparently intended to rouse, and occasion them to review their own standard by the measure of Christ. Unhappily such books mostly fall into the hands of those who amuse themselves with the inconsistencies of others, rather than correct their own. The anonymous writer will forgive the expression of the hope that he will be found in the Great Day to have acted up to the standard, which he lays down ; for it is an aweful thing to judge others, if we bear in memory our Lord's words'', "With what judgement ye judge, ye shall be judged; and with what measure ye mete, it shall be measured unto you again." 5 p. 27. fi p. 55, 50. ' S. Matt. vii. 2. PRlNTliD BY THE SOCIETY OF THE HOLY TRINITY, HOLY ROOD, OXFORD. '■■'' '.■':■' i'MMiii ore