252.9 B18n A i • r .. m / ■ \ ^ 1 NO MAN LIVETH OR DIETH TO HIMSELf!' " f ^ : P«= ■ :.. .■. A ■■ 1 FUNERAL SERMON I* . ••1..,. PREACHED AT WAUKEGAN, ILLINOIS, 4. i 1 ON SUNDAY, MARCH 8, 1850. » ‘ i- 'A' •f- ■ ■? : ■' i . ! ■ ' * ON THE OCCASION OF THE DEATH OF' ^ ' t • / 1 i^INCHESTEli HOYT, ESQ. i y’ BY REV. A. CONSTAJSTTINE BARRY. T x_._ . ■ • FOR NONE or US LIVETH TO HIMSELF, AND NO MAN DIETH TO HIMSELF.—Paul. ! 1 1 1 1 PUBLISHED BY REQUEST. '■ % ’A. f ■ .* ►> . P • V KAC.INE: ROl/'NDS & CO. PRINTERS, “Old Oaken Bucket Offioe.” • P- / * • .“V . 1850.''' . " W. ■ Jr 1 NO MAN LIVETH OR DIETH TO HIMSELF. A FUNERAL SERMON PREACHED AT WAUKEGAN, ILLINOIS, ON SUNDAY, MARCH 3, 1850. ON THE OCCASION OF THE DEATH OF E. WINCHESTER HOYT, ESQ. BY REV. A. CONSTANTINE BARRY. FOR NONE OF US LIVETH TO HIMSELF, AND '1: NO MAN DIETH TO HIMSELF,— Paul. % PUBLISHED BY RE-QUEST. RAC INE: ROUNDS & CO, PRINTERS, ^Old Oaken Bucket OflBco.” .. \ 1850. LIBRARY U. CF!. IRBANA- t i OTfiraia W) il.’IlVTI JrTAI' ‘y / DISCOUESE. l^or none of us livetk to himself and no man dieth to himself. [Romans, 14: 7. Each and every human being was created for some purpose, and that purpose is well expressed by the word. Usefulness. Man never was intended merely to he, for then would the end of his creation be attained by simply living; but it was designed—and the evidences of that design are inwrought with his very nature—that he should do, that he should attain, and that, through his agency, the condition of humanity should be rendered more hopeful, and something be added to the common stock of real substantial good in God's Universal Fam¬ ily. And so certain as an existence has been given him, so certain will the life he lives have its influence on the whole human world; and that influence will be at work, and will exert itself upon Life’s great Intel ests, long after his head is pillowed in the grave. We know that no creature, from the seraph that stands forever in the light of God’s countenance, down to the insect that glitters only for an hour, was made without purpose, or has lived without effect.” Life has a pur¬ pose beyond itself, and comes to us clothed with weighty and solemn responsibilities. Its acts, its employments, the influences which shall go out from it, cannot effect that life alone; for so true is it that Hu¬ manity is our living body, that whether one member suffer, all the members^ suffer with it, or one member be honored, all the members rejoice with it. These considerations invest life with a mighty importance, and call upon us with the impressiveness and authority of a voice from heaven, to devote that life to the great purpose for which it was given; that, if it ^ but for an hour, we may not have liv'ed in vain. This selfishness with which too many wrap themselves round, this hardening of the heart against the woes and distresses of our fellow- men, this scanty and meagre benevolence which is confined to one’s own farnily, or kindred, or sect, what is it all but an out and out rebel¬ lion against the supreme law of human nature. “ Study the system,” says Buckingham, “ which you see all around you, of material, animal, ^d national existence, in its minutest or in its grandest portions.— Nothing, you see, is insulated—nothing existing for itself alone. Ev- 4 FUNERAL DISCOURSE. ery part of creation bears perpetually on some other part, and they must subsist together. Indeed the whole Universe, as far as we have penetrated it, seems to be a mighty and complex system of mutual subserviency. Do you suppose that bright sun has been shining, now many thousands of years, to accommodate us only ? No—it has warm¬ ed into life and joy, innumerable millions of which we know nothing; and it moves, also, to diffuse a wider influence, and to hold together ihe unknown globes and systems of globes, which are balanced around it. Descend as low as you can pierce, through the basest transforma¬ tions of matter, living and lifeless, and you find every thing has its use, and accomplishes its purpose. The very refuse, which man casts out and loathes, returns in all the beauty of vegetation, and brings him sustenance and gladness. The barren waste of Ocean itself is the medium of benevolent communication—its recesses teem with life, and its waters purify themselves by perpetual motion. Even the eter¬ nal ices of the poles are continually melting to supply the waste of fluid, and accommodate the wants of other regions. Benificient activ¬ ity is the primary law’ of creation, and inactive uselessness the eternal crime of human nature.” If it were possible, we have no right to seek the advancement of our own private, personal interests alone, to rest contented with having served ourselves, and to refrain from doing good to our fellow men.—‘ And we are justified, on the authority of the principles of Christianity, in placing a low estimate on that man’s character, who, while profess¬ ing faith in these principles, narrows down the desires of his heart, and his benevolent efforts, to the limited, contracted sphere, of a sordid self-interest. The Infinite Father in placing his child in this world, has made it the field of his action, and has summed up his duty in one vord, “ Thou shalt love thy neighbor as thyself.” This covers the whole ground of moral obligation. It is a law which knows nothing of world¬ ly policy—nothing of geographical boundaries—nothing of party lines —nothing of sectarian divisions:—it overleaps them all, and lays man under obligation to recognize in every other man a brother, and to la¬ bor as earnestly for the promotion of that brother’s interests as he would labor for the promotion of his own. It links him forever to every individual of his race, and is continually urging it upon his soul, that he cannot live for himself alone. When a fellow man has finished his earthly course, and passed off from this stage of action, it is quite common to ask. How did he die? What was the experience of the last moments ? And what w'ere the utterances of the soul in the solemn hour? It is better to ask. How’ did he live ?—what was his life ?—has he lived for himself only, or for others ? This inquiry comes up before us to-day, and repeats itself on this occasion. In the midst of a distinguished professional career, with bright hopes clustering around his soul, and the pathway to distinction and enviable eminence opened up before him, an esteemed and beloved friend and brother has passed away. In this community it is felt that FUNERAL DISCOURSE. 5 a life of no ordinary interest has been blotted out. Was that life true to its grand purpose? I repeat, did he live for himself only, or for others ? It is not my purpose to eulogize the departed dead. The record of a short but useful life, of lofty aims and dignified effort—the living testimonies which have gone out from his examples and his labors—the embalming of his memory in many hearts—a community in mourning and in tears!—these are his fitting eulogy, infinitely beyond what human learning, or language, or eloquence could pronounce. And yet T design to speak of the man—not in terms of mere lauda¬ tion and praise—not as a member of a profession, or a party, or a sect, but as a man and a Christian. And I would speak of him, not because I would formally answer a demand of the occasion, or consult outward appropriateness; but that through a consideration of his life and char¬ acter a great practical lesson may be developed, and sent home im¬ pressively upon the heart. It is not necessary that there should be a long and distinguished public career, that exalted stations be occupied, that high political rank and eminence be attained, and that an outward and perishable glory gather down upon the name, in order that a man be constituted great, in the highest, the Christian sense. He may be eminent as a States¬ man, a diplomatist, a legislator, an orator—his name from his verv youth up may have been associated “ with the highest civil service, and the loftiest civil renown”—he may have been Minister and Sena¬ tor, and President—and yet after all he may be very far from being a truly great man. The pageantry of office, the honors of place and power, are not always the reward of merit, nor often the attendants upon true greatness. They reveal to us but little of the man—but little of his actual life. The question remains unanswered—has he lived for himself alone, or for others? He of whom I speak, was a Man, and there is more in this than to say that he was a King. And though, had he lived, he might never have been called to fill stations of honor and trust in the government of this Republic, nor have been crowned with titles and dignities; yet with that great soul within him, and true to the design of his creation, he would without honors, without the aid of human applause, have left the impress of true words and noble deeds on the condition of his times, and the improvement of the age in which he lived. I do not forget that our departed friend was human—that, there¬ fore, he had faults and imperfections—that he committed errors like the rest of us, and was not always in the right. But let the tomb which encloses his earthly remains, hide these also—let his weaknesses and frailties be buried with him in his grave. Whatever might have been the number and magnitude of these, we must all admit that he did not live for himself alone. He loved his race,—his heart beat for universal humanity—his soul went out in the spirit of fraternal kind¬ ness to meet and embrace the whole world. As a husband, a brother, a friend, a citizen, I am not required to FUNERAL DISCOURSE. speak of him—you all know what was his faithfulness in these several relations. But there was that about him and within him, which did not fully reveal itself to the world. Something of it, it is true, was exhibited in his daily walk, in his upright deportment, his cheerful disposition, his amiable conversation, and pure life; but its fullness was discovered only by those with wliom he had communed in the privacy of his own home. The religious element was largely developed in his nature, and he seemed always when leading in conversation, to choose topics connected with the great theme of religion. In all his feelings, his aims, his desires, his convictions, in the homage of his soul and its pure and sincere worship, he was a Christian, and a spiritual child of God. He loved prayer, and communion with the Father; although he caused no trumpet to be sounded before him, and stood not up at the corners of the streets thanking God that he was not as other men. And thus because of his unaffected piety, his deep religious feeling, his genuine goodness of heart, his warm and ever active benevolence, he lived not for himself alone, but was enabled to glorify God, and do <>ood to his fellow men. In religious faith our departed brother was an Universalist. And to a very considerable extent, as is probable, this faith, the views early adopted and cherished by him, the sentiments he entertained, and the great doctrines which entered into and formed his creed, gave shape and direction to his character and life. He endeavored to live them in all his dealings and transactions, to be governed by the spirit of them in his intercourse with men. It is knowm to you all how far he suc¬ ceeded, and what was the measure of perfection to which he attained. Prominent in his belief was the Fatherhood of God. He believed that the Creator sustains the relation of Father to every human being, and that he reigns and governs as a Father. To him Christianity clearly taught this great truth, and he viewed it as coming to every human being, however defiled and ruined by sin, and bidding him pray, “ Our Father who art in Heaven.” To the mourner in his grief, the weak amid his temptations, the sinner seeking the pardon of his sins, the lananao-e of Jesus Christ addressed itself, “After this manner pray ye. Our Father who art in Heaven.” He believed that it was one great object of the mission of Immanuel, to make known the Fath¬ er, or to reveal the peculiar relation which exists between the Infinite God and the creature man, it being that of parent and child. This he did, not only in words, but in his own person. Not in w'hat he taught merely, but in w^hat he did, in what he was, do we find the revelation of the Father. It was indeed the firm belief of our brother, that the Fatherhood OF God is the great fundamental tenet of all religion—that the highest aim in the mission of Christ was to make knowuu the doctrine of the Divine Paternity, or to reveal the Father. In this truth centered every motive to a religious life, every deep emotion of religious trust, every . .*;.. :•• • .. ■'' . ■ VI ^!A •' 4* / L y " V*' >• i? .- , ■ 'A ' '.'*' f! ■ t V J .9 ,* s> 'V , 4 ’ "; f»N-' r'' % •tr '■ «.%.i''/'.. .' '( . ( V ,>._\ . > . ^ • 'fr-'T‘. ^. ’ )i T /. . -la^ .» • /, *):■» '■ t .> ^ •; > 11 .a* ' .■< .1' i. • » „ . » ’ In jJ • « .' .' ^ . -w rv'V.fiifs: - v T? -■' 1 ^ r , ■”.' ” rjia ,i J *, ■* *• ‘ • . r ^ j ♦. ' • ,/ ,^^2 '•' .'*■ ■' i ', .-' ‘'’W-I -'l^*- ^ ■ lr • i* ' ■"■■• ' '■ 1 •* Nfc , • ■• * - ■ ■•r-:• •' - ■ ' ^ -c . "'Vi^V'^ *■■ '« , ? ■ ‘.i .■ar.-r', ^ ■Jm, ■}' • ‘‘ ■;■ - '■■" ^ '' ■ " :k: ■-1- .■ >. , ' eltv V4 % k*- . • . J- <’ •. t V ' i'f •' -t ,‘{\‘kx*\ \ ■. ^- k * s .. ■' y.. .»•! f --, ’It . 'A ■ '^‘^. •■< •■^i ■ . O' **•> .. ’■ Vv •f , ‘i*; : -• \ (JT ‘ '••. w ■ *'4-. . V-liS , ^ 7 ^ V- >».• ' ,,k.'-'s3^‘'-'- '. ''iM ^ v*. t ■ ' '* ■ y;-* • 'v-’/i 4t , \ ‘ ■•'* ‘ V. • " •■*'' ' •-' r^' k.. .» a ■ : : -r,« , art, .r,.r;4.--*S-'' ••<• -■V-"J V'.r'--' ■. V''1^ ••J^r ■' ^ '• A ft » ;■^'^ » ♦: • ‘"15* .•/f;r ’ .<^ • ■’ I J • o A. v>., ^,: m,. : mfif W.- .. s I- Tt ■ft Q "■:« iT&S-jJ 1 / / r % .r „ / 4' •: - ■ ■ ' . •■;•• •• ^ £ r