THE UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS LIBRARY 552. B8T5 V.27 A VIEW OF TH E MONEY SYSTEM OF ENGLAND, FROM THE CONQUEST ; WITH PROPOSALS FOR ESTABLISHING A SECURE AND EQUABLE CREDIT CURRENCY. BY JAMES TAYLOR. " Above all things good policy is to be used, that the treasure and monies in a state be not gathered into few hands ; for otherwise a state may have a good stock and yet starve ; and money is like muck, no good except it be spread." Bacon. LONDON: PRINTED FOR JOHN TAYLOR, ISoolteeller anti Publiel^ei- to t!)e JDnibrreits of 3Lonttoii; 30, UPPER GOWER STREET. AND SOLD BY J. DUNCAN, PATERNOSTER ROW; HESSEY, FLEET STREET; AND HATCHARD & SON, PICCADILLY. 1828. London : I'rinted by Littlewood & Co. 15, Old Bailey. ADVERTISEMENT. About two years ago the Author of these remarks published a little pamphlet, entitled, " No Trust, no Trade." It was soon afterwards out of print, and he was urged to bring out a second edition. But having found from subsequent dis- cussions that information was wanted upon the subject, rather than argument, he has, in the following pages, incorporated the substance of his former pamphlet, in a general View of the History of English Money from the Conquest to the present time, and of its effects at various periods upon the condition of the English people. The historical facts brought forward are generally of such notoriety to the readers of English history, that he has thought it needless to encumber the work with formal references. He has only had to show the order in which certain events succeeded certain changes in the money system. For the records which more immedi- ately relate to money, and which are not so generally known, he would refer to Tindal's " Notes on Rapin's History," Leake's " Historical Account of English Money," and Ru- ding's " Annals of the Coinage." To the latter work he feels himself much indebted for a great number of important documents and interesting particulars. Bakewell, May, 1828. 359358 A 2 A VIEW MONEY HISTORY OF ENGLAND. WILLIAM THE FIRST. When William had accomplished the conquest of England, he ordered an exact survey and valuation to be made of all the lands in the kingdom, recording their proprietors, tenures, the quantity of pasture, w^ood, and arable land which they contained, and generally the number of tenants, cottagers, and slaves who lived upon them. Having obtained the nation by conquest, he regarded every man as his steward, liable to ren- der an account to him of whatever he possessed. It is also recorded that he brought the Jews from Rouen into England, and that he adopted the present method of account : viz. that of reckoning by pounds, shillings, and pence, or by pounds, ounces, and pennyweights. The pound weight of silver constituted the pound, which was divided either into 12 shillings composed of 20 pennies each, or 20 shillings of 12 pennies ; but it was not till some reigns afterward that it obtained the denomination of the pound sterling. The shilling, like the pound, was probably money of account. The only piece of money known to be current as coin was the denarius, or penny, the value of which, estimated according to the proportion it bore to the pound weight of standard silver, was as 1 to 240, or did. about of our present money. William having obtained an exact inventory of all the property and treasure in his kingdom, knew^, as one of our historians says, of how much wool his English flocks might be fleeced ; and it is generally believed that the flocks were shorn pretty closely under his dominion. There was, however, this advantage to his subjects, — their payments were generally made in kind, and according to their means. If he demanded the material of money from those who had it, he took something else from those who had it not. The nobles or highest class of his subjects were called upon for military service. The tenants of socage lands and demesnes were re- quired to perform work, and to supply provisions. Sometimes they were called upon to furnish articles of luxury, as horses, dogs, and birds of game, or, as the language of that time ex- presses it, palfreys, destriers, chaseurs, leveriers, hawks, &c. Upon various occasions certain fines or forfeitures were de- manded : for instance, when the king's tenant ^V/cffp^7e died, the king held possession of his estates until the son had done homage, and was of age ; the king receiving, in the meantime, all the proceeds of the land ; and when the estates were re- delivered to the son, if he were an earl, he was required to present to the king eight horses saddled and bridled, four hel- mets, four coats of mail, four shields, four spears, four swords, four chaseurs, and one palfrey bridled and saddled : this was called the relief, or re-delivery of the estates of an earl. The relief of a baron was half as much, with a palfrey. That of a vavasor to his lord consisted of his best horse, his helmet, coat of mail, shield, spear, sword ; or in lieu of these, a hundred shillings : that of the countryman, his best beast ; and of him that farmed his lands, a year's produce. It is observable that these, and the like sources of revenue, of which there were many, admitted of being fulfilled without the intervention of any money. The vavasor, it is true, was expected to give a hundred shilUngs for his relief, in lieu of his best horse, &c. ; but if he had not a hundred shillings conveniently at his disposal, the alternative was easy for him. Conformably with this arrangement, it may be supposed that saddlers, smiths, tailoi^, shoemakers, &c. were attached to every large establish- ment, where, in return for their labour, they were fed and clothed at their lord's expence. Among persons of inferior rank the exchange of commodities would be chiefly effected by barter : and the king maintained his soldiers by quartering them upon such of his subjects as had wherewithal to support them. Little or no money therefore w ould be required by the common people, nor was it very essential to those of rank. But although there appeared to be so little actual ne- cessity for money, William seems to have been aware of its power and convenience. On this subject he had probably learnt something from the Jews whom he had brought into England. He took especial care to extract from his subjects as much of the precious metals as he could, without quite de- priving them of all inducement to get them back again ; and for this purpose purveyances were gradually more and more changed into money. It is on record that they were afterwards collected by the sheriff in the following proportions : bread for one hundred men was to be commuted for with one shilling ; a pasture-fed ox one shilling ; a ram or sheep fourpence ; provender for twenty horses fourpence. It is obvious, that as under this arrangement, in the payment of all tributes to government, a pasture-fed ox, or bread for one hundred men, and one shilling, would stand as the exact equivalent for each other, and for other things after the like pi-oportion, so, who- ever had the means of gaining possession of the silver would have the means of getting these commodities, provided the pay- ment of tributes to government were so kept up as to make it incumbent on the people to pay the one or other of the above equivalents. William had the power within himself of accom- plishing both these ends. The Doomsday survey furnished him with an exact estimate of the money it was possible to draw out of the hands of his subjects; and his absolute sway 8 furnished him with the means of taking possession of that money by violence if he chose ; but had he done this he would have destroyed the inducement which the people would other- wise have to get it again : he therefore wisely drew it from them, by making it their interest to give it to him voluntarily, as an acquittance from some obnoxious duty or more burthen- some forfeiture. Thus, the vavasor who had a hundred shil- lings at command, would no doubt gladly pay it for the relief of his estates, rather than have the mortification and trouble of giving up his best horse, and providing himself with ano- ther coat of mail, helmet, sword, &c. ; whilst the hundred shillings, being endowed with power to acquit the vavasor from such a tax, would gladly be received by the nobleman, as a means of commutation for the services and provisions which the king demanded of him. Hence, also, merchants who could send English produce abroad and bring silver back, had a market at home ready for it. The same view holds good with respect to one who had bread to provide for a hundred men: a shilling being made the equivalent, he that had the shilling would doubtless give it in lieu of so troublesome a payment in kind. This, it is obvious, would be done upon the same principle as that which induces the farmers now to pay their tithes generally in money. The tithe collector finds it much more convenient to receive money than pro- duce ; he therefore offers to take, as a commutation, such a sum as the farmer knows to be of somewhat less relative value in the market than the hay, corn, or wool which he must otherwise give, and therefore he sells his goods, and gives money to the tithe collector. Upon this principle, there- fore, William got his wants supplied. He fixed the rate at which he would receive money as a commutation for services or purveyance, and this gave the coin payable as tribute its circulating value. Having an exact knowledge of his subjects' stores, he well knew how to proportion the commutation, so as to secure himself in the receipt of 9 a large share of their precious metals ; and this being done, Jie had only to take his moneyers with him wherever he went, for the purpose of coining, and his wants were sure of being supplied. Agreeably to this view, the money of those early days is often found to have been coined even in villages, wliere it happened that the king had staid. Thus the money system of the Conqueror was rather cal- culated to be a convenient mode of taxation, or of collect- ing a revenue through the willing agency of tlie people, than a system of currency, though it is obvious that a cur- rency system would very naturally grow out of it. This may be illustrated by what has happened in our own times, if we observe the operation of our credit system, as it existed under the Bank Restriction Act. The government was empowered by parliament to enforce payment of a given number of mil- lions of pounds sterling from the people for the forthcoming year. The bank note was authorized by law to represent the pound sterling. Payment of the money was then anticipated by exchequer bills ; the Bank of England gave their pro-r missory notes to government for the exchequer bills; with the promissory notes of the Bank of England the govern- ment purchased their stores from the people ; and the people were content to take those notes for the produce of their labour, &c., because the government was pledged to take them again for taxes. The notes, after performing a long round of circulation, viz . from the government to the contractor ; from the contractor to the factor ; the factor to the manufacturer ; from him to the various workmen employed ; and from them to the butcher, baker, &.c. who paid them to the farmer, and he to the landowner ; found their way back to government through the direct or indirect taxes of all these people. And with the bank notes thus returned to government, the ex- chequer bills ought to have been redeemed. Our view begins with the state of money in the reign of William the Conqueror, because from that period to the pre- 10 sent we have an uninteiTupted record of its history. But prior to his time, a similar system appears to have prevailed, even to the first subjugation of this country by the Romans. Caesar says that the Britons had no money; but that pieces of brass and iron were esteemed valuable among them ac- cording to their weight, and that these supplied the place of coin. Such pieces of metal were useful as objects of barter, but they would serve equally for money. Camden thinks that after the arrival of the Romans in this Isle, the Britons imitated them in their coins ; that this sort of money did not pass current in the way of trade, but was at first coined for some special purpose ; and that after Caesar had imposed a tribute upon the Britons, and they were afterwards oppressed with customs, and other taxes for corn-grounds, plantations, groves, pasturage of greater and lesser cattle, such coins were first stamped for these uses : for greater cattle with a house, for lesser with a hog, for woods with a tree, for corn-grounds with an ear of corn ; those with a man's head for poll-money. I have thought (says he) that in old times there was a certain sort of money coined on purpose for this use, seeing in Scripture it is called tribute money ; and I am the more confirmed in this opinion, be- cause in some of the British pieces there is the Mint master stamping the money with Tascia, which, among the Britons, signifies a tribute penny. But if this money was first coined for the express purpose of tax or tribute, it afterwards came into common use. The money of William being accompanied with the alter- native of payment to the crown in kind, if the people pre- ferred it, was properly taxation money. It received its value from the obligation which was imposed upon the people, either to pay the tax in kind, or to pay a piece of money which the king would receive in acquittance of that tax. Under a patriarchal system, whilst no taxes were paid and no taxation money existed, the precious metals would be ex- 11 changed purely on the barter system ; and no man being compelled to acquire specie, a fixed value, of course, would not be assigned to it. But under a monarchy, when taxes were imposed and every individual had to provide not merely for his own wants, but also for his share of the wants of the king, — as each man must give the required portion of his property or personal services, or something which the state agrees to receive in lieu of that property or personal service, — so money would then be of positive value, equal to the worth of that which it represented. In the time of the Con- queror, we have seen that a pound weight of standard silver (or proportions thereof, duly stamped by the king's moneyer,) was made to possess this representative value ; but whilst ac- companied with the alternative of payment in kind, the pro- duction of such money as a tax could never be onerous to the people ; because no one had the power to enhance its value beyond that of the service or sacrifice for which it was held to be an equivalent. WILLIAM THE SECOND. William the Second continued to act upon the same money system as his father: but he possessed neither the know- ledge nor the prudence which distinguished the Conqueror ; nor could he have so correct an idea of the relative wealth of his subjects ; because, in the nature of things, their con- dition would undergo a change, and, by the operation of the money system itself, that part of the people's wealth, which consisted of the precious metals, would be transferred to other hands. It is true that he had the advantage of entering into possession of his father's store ; but this he soon squandered ; and when it was gone he was put to his wits to find the means of getting it back again. To meet his necessities, money 12 commutations came too slowly in : but to make amends for this, he greatly increased the rate of them wherever he could. It is stated by Ordericus Vitalis, that in the 10th year of his reign, he got 3,000 pounds from Robert de Belesme, earl of Arundel and Shrewsbury, upon the death of his brother Hugh de Montgomery, as a relief for the said earldom, whereas, a short time before, 6,666 pounds is stated to have been the pur- chase money of the dukedom of Normandy. Upon another occasion he had recourse to the following expedient, to sup- ply himself with money. He gave orders that 20,000 men should be raised with all possible speed. In raising this army, those were purposely selected to whom it was particularly in- convenient to leave their families and occupations. When these levies were going to embark, the king's treasurer told them by the king's order, that they might every man repair to his own home upon the payment of ten shillings each. The soldiers being all willing to be dismissed upon such terms, paid the money, and so William raised by the manoeuvre £10,000. Malmsbury says, that the taxes imposed upon the land in this reign were so heavy, that the farmers abandoned tillage, and a famine ensued. HENRY THE FIRST. These modes of taxation were harassing enough, but not intolerable, since the demands of money continued to be ac- companied, at least ostensibly, with the alternative of pay- ment in kind, or personal service ; the choice of this alter- native, although the benefit of it was at the time not duly appreciated by the people, gave to the money system of that day a character of equity, which was lost when payment in money alone was afterwards rendered imperative. 13 But the uncertainty which every man felt in his tenure, when all his possessions were held at the pleasure of the king, and the liability of the people to have soldiers quartered upon them, and to be called on to supply the necessaries of war or the luxuries of the state at the mere will of the monarch, prepared the nation to regard as a benefactor Henry, the brother and successor of William II., who, to secure a crown irregularly obtained, granted to the people a charter, the immediate design of which was, to render their posses- sions more secure, and their contributions to the state appa- rently more definite. As a part of this definite system, the provisions of the king's household, which were accustomed to be furnished in kind, were now rated at certain prices, and collected in money. Beneficial as the definite contribution might be to those who knew how to make the best use of it, the absolute money system which grew out of it presently became to the bulk of the people an instrument of great op- pression. Whilst they were required to supply stores, which they had the option of commuting for money, if more conve- nient to themselves, they were safe from the demand being carried much beyond the occasion ; for a superfluity of sheep and oxen would have been almost as inconvenient to the king's establishment, as the not having enough ; but the case was altered when money had become the unconditional repre- sentative of supplies in kind. Then, to accumulate money was to accumulate sheep, oxen, bread, clothing, &c. in ad- vance, without the trouble, in the meantime, of taking care of them ; and to have power, thus obtained, over the necessaries of life, brought the property of the people more under the king's control than the sword could bring it. Henry appears to have understood how to manage this sys- tem for his own aggrandizement. His forte was to get money : for want of the like tact, his brother Robert was ruined by him. Having by the charter, and his fair promises to the people, secured himself in the possession of the crown of Eng- 14 land, he pretended to be forced to go to war with the two tyrants of Normandy, (as they were called,) viz. Robert de Belesme and the Earl of Mortaigne. On this ground he oppressed his own subjects by an exorbitant tax, although the object was one in which it was notorious that the English had not the least concern. Notwithstanding the charter, and his promises to the people, " this tax (says Rapin,) was levied with all imaginable rigour, even to the imprisoning and plaguing various ways such as had refused, or had not tohere- withal to pay it." As soon as his preparations were finished, he passed into Normandy with a numerous army, carrying with him large sums of money, with which he bribed the no- bles and governors of castles. Amongst other means which he employed for amassing wealth, it is recorded, that when Anselm Archbishop of Canterbury died, Henry kept the re- venues of the archbishoprick to himself for five years. On another occasion, he yielded to the Pope a power to prevent the clergy of England from marrying, and afterwards obtained for himself authority to execute the decrees of the church against the clergy, not, as it appears, to prevent them from marrying, but to make money by it. For when he became invested with the Pope's authority, he gave the priests leave without scruple to keep their wives, upon paying him money for a dispensation ; and when it is recollected how much the superstition of those days favoured the priests in acquiring wealth, it is probable that this was to Henry a fruitful source of revenue. The marriage of his daughter also furnished him with a pretext to extort money very largely from the people. At that time he levied a tax of three shillings on every hide of land, which was thought an immense burden. Henry soon made it apparent, that under a king who was a shrewd money-scrivener, and an ambitious man, an absolute money system, compared with the absolute military power of the Conqueror, was infinitely superior as a means of oppression. William, it is true, knew of how much wool he could fleece his English flocks ; but then, like a prudent shep- 15 herd, he was satisfied with the fleece, — he seldom, or never, touched the carcase. He considered every man in the king- dom bound to pay according to what he had ; but it does not appear that he ever demanded that which his subjects had not. Now, however, under the refined art of Henry's absolute money system, the people were liable to be imprisoned and punished for not complying with impossible demands. After this experience, which was in the early part of Henry's reign, the people coidd no longer remain ignorant of the supreme importance of money. The prudent hoarded the good coin, and the ingenious supplied its place with bad, which the ab- sence of better caused for some time to be tolerated in the circulation, till in the end, Henry, who was in Normandy, finding his money would not pay for so much as it formerly did, sent orders that the severest sentence of the law should be inflicted upon all his moneyers, and this sentence was ac- tually executed on ninety-four persons. After this he had recourse to a new coinage, which was a new evil, for one of the old chroniclers tells us, " by thus changing the money, all things became most dear, whereof a right sore famine ensued." It is remarkable that to the changing of the money is attributed the dearness of provisions, and the dearness of pro- visions (not the scarcity of them) is made the cause of the fa- mine. Thus the case of the poor people of that day was veiy much like that of the weavers of Lancashire in 1826. If they could get money they could get food, but if they could not get money, it was all the same as a famine to them. The change of the money being assigned as the cause of the dear- ness of provisions, renders it probable that the dearness of provisions did not consist in an increased nominal price, but in the greater specific value of the coin, and the consequently increased difficulty of obtaining it. So in our own time, com- paring the money value of bread now, with the money value of it some years ago, it is cheaper now than then ; but com- paring it with the relative means which the common people 16 possess of obtaining the money which commands bread, it i* considerably dearer now. When Heniy died, he is recorded to have left £100,000 in his treasury, and no doubt, from the character of the man, it was all in money of full weight ; each pound a pound weight of silver. Thus we see that the foundation of an absolute money sys- tem was begun in a series of measures which made it the in- terest of the people voluntarily to pay tribute in money rather than in kind, wherever they could, and that it was completed in the reign of Henry the First. We have seen that in the outset it became a means of the most galling oppression (the people being punished for what they could not help), the ground of the most sanguinary executions, and the cause of ** a right sore famine." Such were the early consequences of the absolute money system. The subsequent history of our country shows, that from that time to the present it has been a continual source of perplexity to the crown, and of injury to the people; of perplexity to the crown, when a prince reigned who knew not the art of managing this instrument of taxation and tyranny to his own advantage, for then he was sure to be outwitted by some of his wealthy subjects, though at the peril of their lives ; of invariable injury to the people generally hy whomsoever the issues were controlled. STEPHEN. The circumstances under which Stephen came to the throne soon forced him to distribute among his followers the large stores of his predecessor and with this loss of money, the crown in his hands was shorn of some of its power. Stephen understood not the mystery of money. His necessi- ties induced him to lend the royal sanction to its debasement, 17 and thus did that measure receive the sanction of the crown in this reign, which in the preceding had subjected ninety- four persons to the severest sentence of the law. The disper- sion of the treasure which Henry had accumulated ajfiforded those into whose hands it passed, and who were aware of its increasing power, an opportunity of hoarding it : the confis- cations which took place in the next reign, and which were very numerous, gave them an opportunity of purchasing the forfeited estates with it ; and these confiscations thus became the means of again drawing the money into the royal coffers. HENRY THE SECOND. In this monarch we have another prudent money-getting king. One of our Historians, speaking of him, says the chief taxation of his time was " when he took escuage* of Englishmen towards his wars in France, which amounted to 12,000/. ; but confiscations were many, because there were many rebellions, and every rebellion was as good as a mine." Henry the Second appears to have well understood, and highly appreciated the power of money, for there was found in his coffers, when he died, no less then 900,000 pounds weight of silver, besides plate and jewels. One of the first consequences attendant on the introduc- tion of an absolute money system, would be to check the productions of nature, after they had arrived at a point a lit- tle beyond the immediate wants of the people ; because to produce more food, when that which was already in exis- tence was more than enough for the present buyers, would be only to reduce the money value of that stock which the growers already possessed, and money, be it remembered, under an absolute money system, alone constitutes value. The * A fine in lien of military service. B 18 corn grower, therefore, would be tempted to hoard his money, rather than to expend it in increasing the productions of the soil ; and this would go on till the progressive increase of the population, having at last overtaken the old average produc- tion of the cultivated lands, a famine would ensue, and a famine from this cause, unlike that arising from a temporary interruption in the order of nature, would be some years before it could be counteracted. This effect was produced ; for in the next reign, it is recorded that a dearth did prevail for three or four years, which occasioned so great a mortality that the living scarce sufficed to bury the dead. This famine continued until the population being decreased, and the stock of food probably increased, the stock of food and the people became at length proportioned to each other, and the evil was for that time surmounted. To be, however, the known possessor of money in those days frequently subjected a man, upon almost any or no pretext, to be attainted of some offence against the king or the laws, for which his money was the forfeiture. Though the king therefore might hoard with impunity, the only way which the common man had of preserving the wealth which he could accumulate, was by burying it, and this created another evil. Mr. Ruding tells us in his Annals of the Coinage, that the coins of Henry the Second were rare until a large quantity of them happened to be found at Royston, about the year 1721, and a still larger hoard, to the amount of more than 5,700, at Tealby, in Lincolnshire, in 1807, and in all pro- bability to this day considerable quantities remain concealed in the earth. RICHARD THE FIRST. Henry the Second was followed by a succession of impro- vident kings. In the reign of his son Richard a great famine 10 was experienced, as we have already noticed. Added to this, Richard so impoverished himself and exhausted his revenues by the Crusade in which he was engaged, that when money was afterwards required to be raised for the ransom of his person, the clergy were forced to bring in their church plate, and for a long time latten (pewter) was used in the place of it. The Crusade, and the ransom together, so drained the kingdom of money, and money was now become so essential as a means of living, since every thing was made to bow to it, that the richest, we are told, had enough to do to main- tain themselves. We may imagine what a deplorable state the lower classes must have been in, when such was the con- dition of the highest ; and we cannot wonder that the common people were ready to favor the sedition of William Fitzosborn, sometimes called Longbeard, who, by advocating the cause of the meanest of the people, is said to have gained the hearts of the populace, and to have been held by them in extreme veneration, insomuch that a rebellion was raised in the city of London on account of a tax, the burden of which, Fitzosborn shewed, would fall wholly on the poor. His fate, however, shewed that it was veiy dangerous to be a patriot in those days, for he was shortly afterwards hung in chains with nine of his accomplices. His followers stole away his body and buried it, and the superstition ran, that miracles were wrought at his grave. Neither is it to be wondered at, that when the poor were so oppressed, highwaymen and robbers, who attacked the rich, but respected the poor and unprotected, should stand high in the estimation of the community. To this cause was, probably, owing the celebrity of Robin Hood and his party, who lived in these times. But great as the famine is stated to have been in this reign, it would seem that corn was even then less scarce in England than money; for it is stated by Hoveden, that during the fa- mine. King Richard found ships at St. Valeri full of corn ex- ported from England. This, doubtless, would not have been b2 20 the case, if the merchants could have got as much money for the corn in England as abroad. Richard, however, did not enter into their views, for he ordered all the people belonging to those vessels to be hanged. JOHN. This prince finding himself thwarted in obtaining, by the usual means, those heavy contributions which he wished to levy, endeavoured to exact them by mere force. In the con- flict, the church proved too shrewd, and the barons too strong for him : he not only failed to attain his object, but after being compelled to surrender the glory of his crown to the pope, and the power of it to the barons, he at length died, broken-hearted and unregretted. The unhappy Jews, however, having nobody to stand up for them, felt the full weight of his injustice. Matthew Paris says, those of both sexes were seized all over England, and dreadfully treated, till they would ransom themselves according to the king's pleasure. Among the rest, a Jew at Bristol, though cruelly tormented, refusing to ransom himself, the king ordered that his torturers should every day pull out one of his cheek teeth, till he would pay down 10,000 marks. Accordingly they pulled out seven in as many days ; but on the eighth day he relented, and so, with the loss of seven teeth, parted with 10,000 marks to save the rest. This mode of getting money was obviously much more likely to drive the money out of the kingdom, or into close hiding- places, than to make the king rich, but it affords an illustra- tion of the spirit in which King John would have levied his exactions generally, if his power had been equal to his will. 21 HENRY THE THIRD. The influence which the pope obtained in England through the weakness of king John was severely felt in the following- reign. His holiness had discovered the conveniency, and pos- sessed the power, of collecting his tenths in money. In 1229, the thirteenth year of Henry the Third, it is recorded that these payments were exacted with such severity, that people were compelled to borrow money of the usurers, who came over with the pope's nuncio, and the rate of interest was about 60 per cent, per annum. It is very obvious, that if the pope had been obliged to receive payments in kind, his appetite would have been sooner satisfied, especially if the produce were to have been conveyed to Rome ; but when sheep, oxen, &c. were so conveniently capable of being repre- sented by silver money, the aiiri sacra fames became insatiable. The Italian money merchants, who were now introduced into England by the pope's nuncio, were chiefly distinguished from the Israelitish money merchants in that they enjoyed the pope's protection ; whereas, those Jews who had conscience enough publicly to adhere to the faith of their ancestors, were left to the protection of the king. We have an illustration of the nature of that protection in the twenty-fifth year of Henry the Third. In that year writs were directed to the sheriffs of each county, commanding them to return before him, at Wor- cester, upon Quinquagesima Sunday, six of the richest Jews from every town ; or two from those places where there were but few. The professed object of this order was, that the Jews might treat with the king upon matters concerning their mutual benefit. This business, which was to be for the mu- tual benefit of themselves and the king was, that the Jews should give the king 20,000 marks. He afterwards let the Jews out to farm to his brother Richard, Earl of Cornwall, for a great sum of money, who was to make what more of them he could ; and, truly, Richard seems to have been a shrewd 22 manager of money matters, for when the pope would have borrowed 500 marks of him, the earl replied, he liked not to lend his money to one upon whom he could not distrain. The Jews must have enjoyed a very unenviable protection under such a farmer as Richard. Hume says, Henry's great defects were want of economy and an ill-judged liberality ; but if historians are to be believed, his poverty gendered in him still greater defects, rapacity and meanness. His ways to get money are thus set forth by one of our them : " Never son was more like a father in any thing than King Henry was like his father King John, in this point, for raising money ; for he trod directly in all his steps, if he added not something of his own. King John had great subsidies granted him by parliament, for any great action he undertook ; so had King Henry. King John resumed the lands aliened from the crown ; so did King Henry. King John made benefit of the vacancy of bishopricks and abbeys ; so did King Henry. King John took great fines of many for crimes not proved, but only supposed ; so did King Henry. And John made benefit of a new seal ; so did King Henry. King John extorted great sums from the Jews ; so did King Henry. And one way more he had to get money, which perhaps his father had not ; and that was by begging, as he told the Abbot of Borough, it was more alms to give money to him, than to the beggar that went from door to door." But whatever rapacity Henry might manifest in his ways of getting money from his subjects, his brother Richard, the Earl of Cornwall, appears to have been much more deeply versed in the mystery of money making. In the thirty-first year of Henry's reign, Richard obtained the privilege of making new money in the king's name, for twelve years, in England, Ireland, and Wales, and of this privilege he made enormous profit. But Richard himself was at length outwitted. By means of his immense wealth he obtained the title of King of the Ro- mans. Perhaps the pope saw that he was a dangerous com- 23 petitor in money matters, and therefore favoured his election. The attainment of this honour, however, involved him in ex- pences which presently drained him of all his money, and caused him to return to England in comparative poverty. In the mean time the people of England experienced a complete dearth of money. The demands of the pope and his Italian Jews abroad, and that of King Henry and his Jewish brother Richard at home, caused the absolute money system to act upon the people with the pressure of a perpetual screw ; the demands upon them increasing in proportion as their means were diminishing, until from the dearth of money a dreadful dearth of food ensued. It was, therefore, thought good to change the old money, and to make it baser ; ** whereupon," says Leake, " a new stamp was engraven, and all the old stamps were called in ; the old money was exchanged for new, allowing thirteen shillings for every pound, to the great damage of the people, who, besides their travel, charge and long attendance, received of the bankers scarce twenty shil- lings for thirty. And the reason of this oppression appears to be, because this re-coinage was farmed by the Earl of Cornwall, who was accountable to the king only for the third part. By this means the grievance was increased, instead of being redressed ; and the same Earl of Cornwall, in the forty- first year of King Henry, being elected King of the Romans, is said to have carried into Germany 700,000 pounds sterhng, in ready money ; an immense sum in those days, which, added to what the pope had drawn out of the nation, made a very great scarcity of money. It was this want of money, more than of corn, (for corn had several times been dearer than it was then) that made provision so scarce, that an author says, he saw people fighting for the carcasses of dead dogs, and other carrion ; and that they were glad to eat the wash that was set for the hogs, and many died of hunger." The power of determining value being limited to money, which itself was limited to silver, it followed as a matter of 24 course that to accumulate this, either coined or uncoined, was a much surer way to obtain all other things, than to accumulate those things themselves ; and we have seen that the beggary of the king, and the starvation of the lower orders, were the natural, though unthought-of consequence of the general ac- knowledgment, that value rested upon such a principle. Upon this principle the well-known maxim is founded, " Get money, honestly if you can, but get money." The next two or three reigns show how faithfully this rule was followed, as soon as its importance was discovered. EDWARD THE FIRST. Edward the First, impatient of the beggary to which his father had been reduced, was no sooner in safe possession of the crown, than he shewed himself to be a beggar of a more sturdy class. He was resolved to have money from those who possessed it, without being very delicate about the means ; and the obtaining it from these made his government popular with those who had it not, especially as he appears to have spent the money as freely as he acquired it. The secret of Edward's policy consisted in the skill with which he divided the wealthy powers of the nation against each other, when, by attacking them singly and bringing them by turns to bear upon each other, he so completely subjugated the whole, as to render the power of the crown in his time as absolute as it had been in that of the Conqueror. The Jews were always sufficiently obnoxious to the prejudices of the people to admit of being made an easy prey, whenever it was desirable to assail them. They therefore became the first object of Edward's attack. Under the accusation of having defaced the coin, nearly 3 00 of them were executed in London, in his fifth year, and their confiscated property brought considerable treasure to the king. 25 In his eighth year a writ was issued, requiring all his subjects to shew by what title they held their lands. By this he drew considerable sums from the barons and other landed proprie- tors, and probably would have done much more in that way, but for the spirited defence of John, Earl of Warren, who met him with his own weapons, saying, that he held his lands by the sword, and would so hold them until death. In his 17th year, Edward fined all his judges for corruption, some in 1,000 marks, some in 2,000, others in 3,000 and 4,000 ; one in 6,000, and another in 7,000. Sir Adam Strat- ton. Chief Baron of the Exchequer, was mulcted in the enor- mous sum of 34,000 marks; and Thomas Wayland, found to be the greatest delinquent, and it is said of the greatest sub- stance, had the whole of his estates and goods confiscated. When forfeiture to the king was the punishment, it was a fearful thing for a delinquent to be possessed of great pro- perty. In his 18th year Edward banished all the Jews from his kingdom, about 15,000 in number, and confiscated all their goods. The abuses to which the nation had been subjected by the pope and the clergy, from the time that the pope had obtained the complete ascendancy over king John, prepared the people to acquiesce in any measures on the part of the crown, which went to cripple the ecclesiastical powers. Ed- ward had already drawn frequently and largely upon the re- venues of the church, and the clergy, in the spirit either of peace or policy, had quietly submitted. But their patience being exhausted with the continuance of those demands, they at length thought fit to resist an imposition laid upon them in his 25th year. Whereupon, Edward immediately put them out of his protection, by which means they were deprived of justice in any of his courts, so that they were presently forced to concede every thing that he asked. There was perhaps no class of his subjects, possessing money, from whom he did not by one means or other contrive to extort it. But as he does 26 not appear to have left much behind him, it is fair to con- clude that he spent it as freely as he got it, and this may ac- count for the high price of provisions in this reign, their value in money depending essentially upon the amount of money in circulation, (not merely on money in existence,) which amount is always great when the state is possessed of the will and means to cause a great expenditure. In the 15th year of his reign, wheat was 5d. a bushel, and in the next year Is. dd. The year following, it was as low as 3d., and again as high as Is. 4d., from which price it progres- sively increased for some years, until at last it was sold for 2s. 6d. the bushel. In his 27th year, it was again reduced to 5d. the bushel. These fluctuations in the price of the first necessary of life, at a time when the currency was entirely metallic, shew that extreme changes in value are not the ex- clusive consequence of a credit currency. The mode of obtaining supplies which Edward had re- course to was not of a character to last long ; it contained within itself the principle of its own destruction. For after he had once drained the wealthy part of his subjects of the bulk of their money, and spent it again, every repetition of the process would be attended with less success ; and that which was expended would by degrees find its way into the possession of persons who could either conceal their property from the king's knowledge, or defend it against his demands. Whilst, therefore, the prices of provisions were enhanced by the free expenditure of the monarch, his means of keeping up that expenditure gradually became exhausted. To this cause, aided as it was in his 25th and 26th years by a large foreign expenditure, may be attributed the fact, more than to to the increased quantity of provisions, that the money value of wheat in his 27th year was so much reduced. And pro- bably to the same cause may be owing the enactment of a law, in the same year, to limit the price of provisions ; for supposing the king to have found difficulty in pro- 27^ curing money to meet the market price of provisions, the next expedient which would suggest itself to his mind, would naturally be to make the market price conform to the amount of his income. By this law it was fixed, that a fat lamb should be sold for 1 6d. from Christmas to Shrovetide, and all the rest of the year for 4c?. ; a goose or a pheasant for 4c?. ; a couple of pullets for l^d., &c. So long as the rich supplied him with money, Edward's government, however oppressive it might be to the wealthy, would be favourably regarded by the common people, inas- much as it suspended the operation of those evils, which an arbitrary money system was calculated to inflict upon them. It is observable, that although there was a long continued scarcity of provisions in this reign, attended with a great in- crease of their money price, yet as the means of obtaining money kept pace with the increased price, there does not ap- pear to have been any very great distress experienced by the bulk of the people. In former reigns, when similar scarcity existed, though the money value of provisions was kept nomi- nally low, the poorer sort not being able to obtain remune- ration for their labour at even that low rate, were often stai'ved to death. This exemption, however, from the oppres- sive bearing of the money system, could not last long. Laws to restrict the price of provisions are calculated to tell upon the comforts of the community ; since to restrict the price of commodities is virtually to restrict the price of the labour expended in producing them ; and as labour is the only commodity which the common people have to bring to market, their wealth rises and falls with the money value of it : there- fore, to limit the price of provisions was in fact to draw from the poor their labour upon the same terms that the rich had been recently compelled to surrender their property. No doubt, every body thought then, as almost every one does now, that the principle of low prices is an excellent thing in the main, and only bad when applied to one's own individual case. 28 And probably, the poor people themselves might be as clamo- rous for low prices then as they are now ; not perceiving how intimately and necessarily the low prices of commodities and low wages are connected. EDWARD THE SECOND. Edward inherited the crown of England when it was sur- rounded with laurels. He came into the possession of some money also ; but unless he could replenish his coffers, it was impossible to sustain the glory of the crown, and his father had so reaped the wealth of his subjects as to leave but scanty gleanings for the son. The barons, profiting by ex- perience, were now on the alert to resist by force a repetition of arbitrary enactments against themselves. The revenues of of the church had been so exhausted, that its ministers were glad to co-operate with the barons to protect themselves against further impoverishment. All the property of the Jews, as we have seen in the preceding reign, had passed into the hands of the monarch, and therefore that source of supply was, for the present, effectually cut off. It therefore behoved Edward the Second to extend the principle of making his money go further in payments. Coin of inferior value was accordingly countenanced in circulation, and the principle of restricting the prices by law, which in the preceding reign had been applied to many minor articles of food, was now extended to larger objects. It was ordered that a pasture-fed ox should be sold for 155. ; an ox fattened with corn for 20s.; the best cow for 12s., and so in proportion for other things. After these rates were fixed, it is natural to suppose that the owners of the above articles would be little solicitous to sell them ; and that they would care still less to increase 29 their stock, when they were to be compelled to part with it at a price which was doubtless below the natural money- value, or the law would have been uncalled for. The conse- quence of these enactments may therefore be easily foretold. Provisions became excessively scarce, insomuch that, in a short time, it was with difficulty enough could be obtained for the king's household ; and a famine so dreadful ensued, that it is said the thieves newly cast into prison were torn to pieces, and eaten half alive by those already there. A terrible pes- tilence, as usual, was the consequence ; and in about three years, the people being diminished and the food increased* (the king and parliament having in the mean time revoked their order for the restriction of the price of provisions, and permitted the market folks to make the best of their wares) things were again brought round. Afterwards numerous confiscations took place. These sup- plied the king with money ; but it is probable that they also furnished him with a strong temptation to shed the blood of so many of his nobles. The manner in which he subsequently lost his crown and his life, shows how dangerous it is for a monarch to sanction, by his own example, the exercise of mere arbitrary power: the precedent established by Edward the First proved fatal to his immediate successor. EDWARD THE THIRD. Hitherto we have seen the operation of a money system limiting the representation of value solely to silver, and we have seen that in a few reigns, after the first confirmation of this system, our ancestors were subjected to many dreadful famines, some of which are directly attributed, by historians, to the absence of money rather than of food, and others to 30 an absence of food, which, on natural principles^ may fairly be derived from the false estimate of value which such a money system could not fail to infuse into the minds of those who were subject to it. Under this system it was impossible for the king to sustain an adequate quantity of money in circulation, without gross injustice to some of his people, in violently forcing from them the material of money ; and if the circulation were not adequately sustained, starvation be- came the inevitable lot of others of the community. We have witnessed the continuance of the system till it drove Henry the Third to have recourse to beggary, and Edward the First to what would have been robbery, if the acts of that reign had been the deeds of any one of less authority than a monarch. But in the course of the reign of Edward the Third an im- portant change was effected in this money system by the in- troduction of gold into the currency. Up to this time the legal pound sterling had been of equal value, or nearly so, with the pound weight of silver ; for, until the reign of Ed- ward the First, it required a pound weight of silver to make a pound sterling ; and afterwards a pound weight was au- thorised to make one pound and three pence sterling ; there- fore, though a pound weight of silver was not a pound ster- ling until it had received, by royal sanction, the impression of coinage, yet a legal pound sterling was, or ought to have been, a pound weight of silver, subject to the above trifling abatement. This continued until the eighteenth year of the reign of Edward the Third, consequently the pound sterling until that time was subject to a test which could not be abused. But when gold was introduced into the coinage, this test was soon lost sight of. For then it was in the power of the king to cause the pound sterling to be represented by a given quantity of gold, as well as by a given quantity of silver ; and thus by making the gold coinage at one time conform to the test of the silver standard, and at another time by mak- 31 ing the silver coinage conform to the test of the gold stand- ard, the king was furnished with a plea for altering the pound sterling at his pleasure. Edward's first coinage of gold was upon a scale which made the pound weight of gold, of certain fineness, represent 15/. of sterling silver; but this value being found too high in relation to the silver standard, the difi^erence was attempted to be adjusted by a new coinage of both gold and silver, in which the pound weight of gold was coined into 13/. 3s. Ad., and the pound weight of silver into 1/. 2s. 6d. This arrangement took place in the eighteenth year of Edward the Third. By this coinage a piece of gold, called a noble, considerably heavier than our present sovereign, and more pure, was made to pass for 6s. Sd. In two years afterward this arrangement of the relative value of gold to silver was again altered. It was then ordered that the pound weight of gold should represent 14/. sterling of silver. Five years after this (25th of Edward III.) another change took place. It was enacted that the pound weight of gold should make 15/., and the pound weight of silver 1/. 5s. These frequent variations in the relative value of an equal weight of gold and silver, gave early proof of the im- possibility of adjusting by law the proportions in which they really exist, and consequently their value with respect to each other, without the intervention of some other measure common to both, yet independent of either, by which, as on .a gra- duated scale, their true relation might be ascertained. At this stage of our inquiry it becomes necessary to ad- vert to the terms in which these fluctuations in the value of the precious metals are usually expressed, and to the sense in which the reader will be required to understand them through- out the subsequent pages. Gold is said to be loioered in re- spect to silver, when a pound weight of it is declared by law to be exchangeable against a less quantity of silver than for- merly, and it is of course raised when the contrary takes place. Vice versa, silver is said to be lowered or raised when its pro- 32 portion to gold is altered, the latter, in snch cases, remaining stationary. But there is a further relation to be noticed, which is, when gold and silver remain in the same proportion to each other, but the value of both is altered with respect to other things, — provisions for instance. This alteration may be effected either by coining the pound weight of standard silver and gold into a greater number of pieces of the same denomination as before, or by causing the current coin to pass for more in amount than it had previously done. In either case of this last description of change in the value of gold and silver, where other commodities are the objects of comparison with them, the coin is said to be enhanced. Agreeably to this phraseology, gold, after its first introduc- tion, was lowered in^ value, or silver was raised, (according as either is taken for a standard) ; but the coin altogether was enhanced (that is, against commodities and labour,) in the course of seven years no less than 20 per cent., which large profit was the portion of those who had the precious metals under control. So great an enhancement of the value of gold and silver in so short a time, was a mine of wealth, the discovery of which might have satisfied the king ; but his wants grew with their gratification. Recent experience prevented the government from legislating about the price of commodities ; they were therefore left to find their own level in the reduced currency ; but with the price of labour, nothing but the analogy of the cases forbade interference. The same selfish policy, therefore, which in the preceding reign had created a famine by restricting the money value of provisions, again overcame the suggestions of reason and humanity ; and a foundation for the rebellion, which took place in the next reign, was now laid by the passing of a law to limit the money value of labour. In the very year that the last en- hancement of the coin took place, it was enacted that the price of labour, under the new standard, should be restricted to its nominal amount under the old standard. Thus Avhilst provisions were permitted to rise in value, the poor man's pro- perty, his labour, was to be kept down. The effect of this law was for some time counteracted by the warfare which distinguished the middle of this reign, and which provided both employment and remuneration for all the restless spirits of the nation. During this period the kings of both Scotland and France became Edward's prison- ers; and for the release of the latter, in the 34th year of Ed- ward III., France consented to pay no less than three millions of crowns of gold, two of which crowns were to be equal in value to one English noble. No sooner however did the re- sources, supplied by successful warfare, begin to slacken, than it became expedient for the legislature to devise some plan by which the legal rate of the wages of husbandry might be made adequate to the support of the labourers. But instead of raising their wages to their necessities, government endea- voured to adjust the appetites of the poor to their wages. Pursuant to this, in the 37th year of Edward the Third, an act was passed, declaring that labourers and husbandmen should be allowed only one meal a day, and further declaring what kind of food they were permitted to eat. Afterwards, when war had not only ceased to be a profitable, but actually became a losing game to England — when, as it is said, king Edward expended more money in losing towns than it had formerly cost him to win them, and when money must be had from some source or other to supply the wants of the state, — the measure of injustice towards the inferior classes ap- pears to have been filled up. For instead of taking money from the wealthy in preference, as was proposed by the Duke of Lancaster, it was most unreasonably enacted by Parlia- ment that a poll tax of fourpence per head should be levied upon evert/ person, male and female, above the age of four- teen years, those only excepted who were living on alms. Thus, at the conclusion of the glorious reign of Edward the 34 Third, England appears to have nearly reached what some would deem that point of perfection in political economy, which denies to the working people adequate wages and proper food, and yet requires them to supply the revenues of the state — a point which Egypt also was very near attaining, when the industrious Israelites were rescued from the neces- sity of making bricks without materials, by the miraculous interposition of Heaven. RICHARD THE SECOND. Those oppressive regulations, with respect to the labour- ing classes, which commenced in the last reign with an altera- tion of the money laws, had their natural issue in the rebel- lion under Wat Tyler. It is notorious that the poll tax proved the direct means of arousing that rebellion, and the rapidity with which the flame spread when once it was lit, shews that the minds of the working people throughout the kingdom were in a state of high excitement. They felt that gross injustice had been done them by the higher classes, and menaces of destruction were levelled not only against wealthy people, but against property itself. The following couplet, which it is stated was very popular at the time, no doubt ex- presses the views then entertained of the distinction of ranks : •■' When Adam delved and Eve span, Who vi^as then the gentleman ?" Judging from what was done by Wat Tyler and his fol- lowers, it is highly probable that their intentions were not over-rated in the dying confession of Jack Straw, when he declared that their purpose was to cut off the heads of the king and all the wealthy people in the kingdom, and to burn the city of London. After this experience more caution appears to have been ex- 35 ercised both in taxing the poorer classes and in applying the law to the restriction of their wages; and it is not improbable that a contest for the crown, which about this time began to agitate England, might tend to improve their condition, how much soever it mig-ht disturb the comforts of their su- periors. For whilst the common people were liable to be con- tinually wanted as soldiers, by one party or the other, they would doubtless obtain better fare as the retainers of some nobleman, than that which the parliament of Edward the Third had allotted to them as artisans and husbandmen. HENRY THE FOURTH. In the thirteenth year of this monarch, the specific weight of standard silver in the pound sterling was again reduced. It was then enacted, that the pound weight of standard silver should make 1/. 10s. sterling, and the pound weight of gold 16/. 13s. 4id. The previous regulation, it will be recollected, was 1/. 5s. for silver, and 15/. for gold. So that the precious metals were not only enhanced, but their relative value was again altered ; silver was enhanced one-fifth, or 20 per cent. ; and gold little more than one-tenth. " The great scarcity of money within the realm of England, and other mischiefs and causes" were assigned as the reason for this deterioration of English money. But the fact was, that the enhancement of the value of gold and silver in coin was naturally followed by a progressive advance in the mercantile value of the uncoined material, until the mercantile value became upon a par with the coined value ; and when this became the case, no person would take his metal to the mint and allow the king and the mint-master a profit upon the coinage, when he could make more profit of the metal by taking it to the merchant. When the bullion-market got into this state, money naturally became scarce. c 2 36 Various strong and arbitrary measures were repeatedly tried under these circumstances to prevent the exportation of bullion, and to force its importation. But private interest always proving too ingenious for public laws, in the end it became necessary to raise the value of gold and silver in coin, to such a degree, as to overtop the mercantile value of the uncoined material. Usually, as soon as this was done in any particular country, in England for instance, there was, for a season, plenty of money in circulation, because, until the ex- ample were followed by other countries, it would, of course, be profitable to merchants to bring the precious metals there : again, the new money being so much lighter than the old money, nobody, in the first instance, would like to hoard it, lest it should be again restored to the former standard, to the loss of the holders, as was formerly the case, when the pound sterling was restored to the pound weight of silver ; and each alteration of the value was accompanied with a clause which encouraged this apprehension. From these causes, the quan- tity of gold and silver in the nation was not only increased actually, but also increased in its efficiency, private interest operating to sustain it in more lively circulation, and a tempo- rary prosperity was the consequence. But as increased prices, and increased wages (when unrestrained by law) naturally followed in the train of consequences, with a further increase in the mercantile value of gold and silver ; so, when the king had reaped the first fruits of a diminution of the coin, and he, as well as others, had enjoyed the privilege of paying off his debts with a less quantity of the precious metals than that in which they had been contracted, then the old evil of " great scarcity of money within the realm of England, and other mischiefs and causes," gradually returned, and called for a re- petition of the process. 37 HENRY THE FIFTH. During the short, but brilliant career of this monarch, money was preserved from further deterioration. In the first year of his reign the clergy were led to entertain serious fears lest he should take their temporalities from them. To divert him from this purpose, it is said, they gave him a very large sum of money. In his fourth year he drew considerable sums from the laity, but more from the clergy, towards the support of his wars in France. Being still in want of money he pawned his crown for a large sum to his uncle, the Bishop of Beaufort, and his jewels to the Lord Mayor of London. To have been forced to have recourse to these modes of getting money is a sufficient proof that his sole object in obtaining it was to give it circulation. The success, however, of his wars was probably the chief cause that during his reign the nation was preserved from any further diminution of the coin. HENRY THE SIXTH. So great a scarcity of the precious metals was now ex- perienced, that by an act of the legislature, it was commanded that all wool, wool-fells, and tin, exported, should be paid for in gold and silver, which gold and silver were to be brought to the mint to be coined ; and the sellers of the above articles were also forbidden, by law, to lend to any merchant any of the money which they should receive for them. But though gold and silver were both scarce in England, gold, it seems, was the rarer of the two ; which arose from gold and silver, in their mercantile character, varying in their relative value from the proportion assigned to them in their money character, so as to make it profitable for dealers and merchants to buy up silver money with gold money, or vice versa. At this time 38 the coined gold of England bore a considerable premium above the coined silver, in the public market of Europe, and it had become a common practice for foreign merchants to make their bargains to be paid in gold alone. To check this practice, it was enacted, that no merchant alien should be allowed to bind any of his Majesty's subjects to make payment in gold for any debt, and if any refused to take payment in silver for any debt due to him, he should be subject to a penalty of double the amount of the sum. The scarcity of money appears to have been a growing evil throughout this reign. Mr. Ruding attributes to the extremity of the distress which the king in consequence experienced, his readiness to put faith in alche- my for the supply of his wants. In his 35th year, his ma^ jesty's expectations were raised so high, that in a patent which he granted to certain persons for practising that art, he speaks with the utmost confidence of being able soon to pay fill his debts with real gold and silver produced by the stone. EDWARD THE FOURTH. Edward the Fourth resorted to the old method of making a larger quantity of money out of the same quantity of metal ; which, if he could get the metal, proved him '' a wiser child of this world" than his predecessor. In his fourth year, he enhanced both gold and silver 25 per cent., which was, in effect, to tell every one who owed £100, to take his bill quickly and write down fourscore. At this time it was ordered that the pound weight of silver should make 1/. 17s. 6d. sterling, in- stead of 1/. 10s.; and the pound weight of gold 20l.l6s.8d., instead of 16/. 13s. 4cL But even this vast and sudden en- hancement, it seems, was not found enough, with respect to gold ; for in the next year it was ordered, that the pound weight of gold should be coined into 22/. 10s. : so that at 39 this time gold money was enhanced in value considerably more than silver money; whereas, in the former great change made by Henry IV., silver money was enhanced in a much greater proportion than gold. The proclamations which an- nounce these alterations speak rather more explicitly of those " other mischiefs and causes" which had led to the scarcity of money in England, than the ordinance of Henry IV. had done. Amongst other things, " lack of bringing of bul- lion into the king's mint," is stated, " which, as is conceived, is because they that should bring bullion may have more for their bullion in other prince's mints than in his." Hence it appears that other princes were not ignorant of the conve- nience of enhancing the precious metals ; and the necessity of adjusting the coined money of different countries to each other served afterwards as a pretext for debasing the stan- dard, as well as for lessening the size of the coin. By the second gold coinage of Edward IV. which took place in his fifth year, the noble was ordered to weigh 5 dwts. 8 grains, exactly the weight of our present guinea ; but the quality of the gold was near 10 per cent, finer. Its value was fixed at lOs. ; if it was under weight, it vras to be refused in payment. Considerable inconvenience being found to result from this, it was shortly afterwards enacted, that whatever deficiency there might be in the weight of the noble, should be made up with current silver. In the seventh year of Edward IV. complaint was made that Ireland was destitute of silver, — that the new coined money of that country was carried away daily, and that the people, contrary to law, (necessity being stronger than law,) continually took clipped money in payment : it was therefore ordered, that there should be an entirely new coinage, lower- ing the specific worth of Irish money very considerably ; and that after the ensuing Easter, all other silver coins or money should be strictly prohibited from circulating in Ireland. All persons receiving or paying them, were to be adjudged guilty 40 of felony. It seems, however, that the people were not put in possession of the means of getting the new money in a degree commensurate to their wants, and its diminished worth ; for in consequence of this alteration of money, all kinds of merchan- dize and victuals became so excessively dear that many peo- ple were near perishing through want, and many gave up their houses and quitted the land. When the value of the pound sterling was altered by Ed- ward III., it may be presumed that neither he nor foreign princes, nor mercantile men, were immediately aware of the changes which it would occasion ; but now, the consequences likely to result from such depreciation of the pound ster- ling were better understood, and they were so quickly brought about, as to leave the sovereign but little time in which he could make his profit. By the enhancement made in the 6th year of Edward IV., the crown gained a profit of 11. Os, lOd. out of every pound weight of gold ; for the pound weight was coined into 221. 10s. Od., while the person who brought the metal to be coined received back only 2\l.9s.2d.: and so with the silver, the pound weight pro- duced 37s. 6d., but the owner received only 33s. which left a profit of 4s. 6d. to the crown. But the rise of the market value of the metal so rapidly followed this enhancement of the coin, that in his 8th year, the king found it necessary to reduce the seignorage on gold to 14s. 6d. and on silver to 2s. Sd., and in his 1 1th year it was further diminished to 7s. 6d. on gold, and to Is. 6d. on silver. HENRY THE SEVENTH. The pound sterling remained unimpaired during the reign of Henry VII. That shrewd and politic monarch being in the undisputed possession of the throne, and fully conscious of paramount value of money, appears to have had his attention 41 keenly excited to the acquisition of wealth ; and to his skill in accumulating money may be attributed that high degree of absolute power with which he again invested the crown of England. Henry understood too much of the mystery of money, not to be aware that no real good could accrue to the crown from diminishing the weight of the pound sterling, whatever temporary advantage it might afford an improvident king. Had it been possible for a monarch, with the knowledge of a Jew in the science of money, to have monopolized the coin, and yet to have prevented the clipping of it, Henry might have been that man, but in defiance of all his regula- tions money grew scarce ; scarcity made people less scrupu- lous about its perfection ; and as there was a market for light money the article was sure to be provided. This monarch's disposition to hoard wealth probably tended in no little de- gree to make money scarce. The treasure he is recorded to have left behind him is variously stated, but all accounts agree in making it much more than was accumulated by any of his predecessors. It was mostly secreted under his own key. The malpractices by which it was amassed were so notorious, that Henry VIII., on coming to the crown, thought fit to cause two of his father's favourites (Empson and Dudley) to be beheaded for their services in this matter ; and several of the inferior agents were suffered to perish in prison. In the hands of Henry VII., parliamentary power and judicial influence were quite as potent in contributing to the wealth of the king, as the direct power of the sword was in the hands of the Conqueror and Edward I. HENRY THE EIGHTH. The love of display was greater in Henry VIII. than the love of money ; and therefore, though he inherited such im- mense wealth from his father, he soon found means to scatter 42 it. During its dispersion, the public probably were benefited, but this was paid for afterwards. The king's want of money caused him to exercise the royal prerogative in reducing the pound sterling, and he taxed his subjects to an amount which the stock of precious metals in the kingdom could not possibly represent, without diminution or deterioration of the coin, in weight or purity. In his 18th year, it was enacted, that the pound weight of silver should make 21. 5s. sterling ; and the pound weight of gold, 27/. sterling. Thus each was en- hanced about 20 per cent. ; but after this, the money was ra- pidly debased and diminished, until in his 37th year, a pound weight of metal, which contained only four ounces of fine sil- ver, the remaining eight ounces being alloy, was coined into 21. 8s. Od. sterling, and the pound weight of gold, which was now only 20 car. fine, and 4 car. alloy (instead of 23 car. 3| grs. and J gr. alloy), was coined into 30/. ; so that the pound weight of silver of the old standard, which prior to this reign was authorized to make \l. 17s. 6d. sterling, was now actually coined into 71. 4s. ; and the pound weight of fine gold, which previously formed 27/., was now converted into 36/. By this change, silver was enhanced to nearly four times its former value, while gold was only raised about one-third : thus their relation to each other in the money system was amazingly altered ; but not so their mercantile value, for no one that could help it parted with gold, or old silver in payment, at that rate. The money value of an old angel was fixed at 8s. ; but Stow says, that he had seen 21s. given for one ; it was for the purpose of using it in gilding, he tells us : but when it is considered that the 21s. contained only one-third their weight of silver, it was a profitable purchase in a mercantile point of view. The prices of victuals, and the rate of rents for lands and tenements, were presently raised in some proportion to the diminished worth of the money, and of course far beyond any former precedent. Clipped silver, however despised at other times, was then as diflficult to meet with as hght guineas dur- 43 ing the latter part of the last war; for of course, no one would lend, when he was liable to be repaid in baser money. The difficulty of borrowing clipped, bent, or broken silver, is thus humorously illustrated in some verses of that day : Hast thou any bowed silver to lend me, Joan ? Nay. Hast thou any broken silver for me? None. Hast thou any dipt silver ? I had, but 'tis gone. Hast thou any crack'd groat? Crack'd groat ! nay, not one. No silver, bowed, broken, clipped, crack'd, nor cut. Here's a friend for friendship not worth a crack'd nut ! EDWARD THE SIXTH. This last and worst coinage of Henry the Eighth continued in circulation until the third year of Edward the Sixth, when the purity of the coin was increased ; but exactly in the same degree its value was enhanced, so that in effect it remained without improvement. Instead of the pound weight of metal of four ounces of silver and eight ounces of alloy making 21. 8*. sterling, Edward ordered that a pound weight of metal, of six ounces silver and six ounces alloy, should make 3Z. 12s., so that what was gained in purity was lost in weight. The shilling was thus reduced to 3 dwts. 8 grs., one half of which only was of fine silver ; whereas the weight of the groat, until the 13th year of Henry the Fourth, had been 3 dwts. 4| grs. undebased. It is supposed to have been this small shilling of Edward the Sixth which caused Bishop Latimer, in a sermon before the king, sarcastically to say, " We have now a pretty little shilling, indeed a very pretty one ; I have but one I think in my purse, and the last day I had put it away almost for an old groat, and so I trow some will take them." Latimer in his next sermon vindicated himself for having brought this subject forward in the pulpit, by an allu- 44 gion which shewed that he conceived the bad state of the money was occasioned by the covetousness of those at the head of the state, and that it was accordingly a crime which it was his duty to reprove. By this new coinage the merchant was to have 3/. 45. for the pound weight of fine silver, which being to be coined into 11. 4s. left the king a profit of 4/. sterling. This enormous profit on the coinage was a confirma- tion of Latimer's suspicion. It may seem strange that the merchant should supply silver upon terms apparently so unprofitable; but although the coined silver of England was greatly enhanced above the mercantile value of it, the coined gold of England was not so enhanced, and therefore the 3/. 4s. which the mer- chant was to receive for his pound weight of silver must be understood to have been sufficient, in the first instance, to enable him to discharge English debts, or get gold with it, so as to realize a profit on the transaction. Henry the Eighth, by debasing the gold money, thought to make profit of the gold coinage as well as of the silver coinage ; but it was soon found to be impossible, as profit could only be gained, even by a king, from making the one comparatively dearer than the other. Accordingly the coined value of gold money was kept on a par with its mercantile value, so that it could be employed to buy silver with at its mercantile value also ; and then the royal proclamation could cause silver in its coined state to bear any value, in the home circulation, which his Majesty might chuse to put upon it, whereby a proportio- nate profit was secured until the means of getting gold were exhausted. But whilst silver coin was thus made to possess so high a money value, and gold was restrained to its mercantile va- lue, it was in vain to expect that any gold coin should remain in circulation, or that the silver should escape being counter- feited, seeing it was possible to make it as good as the king's money, and for the counterfeiter to get an immense profit out I 45 of it. , William Thomas, clerk of the council, notices this, in his letter to Edward VI., exhorting him to reform the coin : " If there be any quantity of gold remaining (as some men think but small) it cannot come to light ; because that like as the value of our [silver] money doth daily decay, so doth gold increase to such value that lying still it amounteth above the revenues of any land. And he that shall live twelve months, shall see that an old angel [which by law was current for eight shillings] shall, in value and estimation, want little of twenty shillings of our current money, if provision for the redress of your Majesty's coin be not had." The temptation, indeed, to counterfeit the coin of the realm was at that time so strong, that men in the higher classes of society, and those immedi- ately connected with the mint, were guilty of it. Sir Wil- liam Sharrington, master of the mint at Bristol, confessed that he had made large profit of clipping and shearing the coin, (of course the old coins, for the new were not worthy of it,) and that in the first year of King Edward he had issued 12,000/. of counterfeit money. It now became apparent to the king's advisers, that as it was natural, in the way of trade, for the uncoined material of money to follow the value it was allowed to possess in coin, in a short time after the first issue of the diminished money, so the crown in the long run could not derive anymore profit out of the coinage of worthless money than of good j and that whilst the counterfeiter was participating with the crown in the profits arising from the continual debasement of the money, the king in the end bore all the loss by the diminished specific worth of his annual receipts. The popular voice too was decidedly opposed to this worth- less money, although there was doubtless good foundation for the opinion of those who, at the time, maintained that three- fourths of the people were bettered in their condition by it. The letter of Mr. Thomas before referred to goes to the sup- port of this opinion. He says, that, from the worthlessness 46 of the money, people employed it to great disadvantage rather than keep it. — As the value of labour would naturally be increased by the demand, and as three-fourths of the people, at least, are indebted for their comforts to a free de- mand for labour, so it would follow of course, that whilst the wealthy esteemed it more advantageous to expend their money to disadvantage rather than keep it, the condition of the great majority of the people, whose only property was their labour, could not fail to be improved by the expenditure. The necessity of a reformation of the money being now ge- nerallv admitted, measures were taken for efFectino; it. But these were again discreditable to the government, and injuri- ous to the common people. Although the gold money, as a mercantile commodity, was enormously below its value in relation to silver, yet, strange as it may seem, the first measure adopted towards the refor- mation of the coinage was to reduce the money value of gold, so that a pound weight of gold of the old standard was allow- ed to make only 28/. I65. It is fair to believe that the go- vernment neither possessed the power nor the inclination to issue much gold according to this scale, and that it was merely adopted as a device for drawing the gold already in coin out of the hands of the more simple part of the holders of it, by leading them to suppose, that if they did not immediately part with it, they should sustain loss ; for in the next year, the pound weight of standard gold was again enhanced to 36/. This measure was accompanied with a piece of state policy respecting the silver money, which appears to have possessed the like character for integrity. According to the journal of Edward VI., it was determined, in the early part of the fifth year of his reign, to coin 20,000 pounds' weight of metal into money, so much baser than even that which was already in cir- culation, as to get a clear profit by the transaction of 160,000/. for the purpose, as is alleged, of paying the debt of the realm, of defending the country, and of amenditig the coin. 47 Agreeably to this resolution, a coinage took place by which a pound weight of metal, containing only three ounces of silver (the rest alloy) was coined into 3/. 125. sterling, thus making the pound weight of fine silver equal to 14/. 8s. sterling. Of this coin the merchant was to receive 10s. for an ounce of silver. It is difficult to conceive how this base coinage was to furnish means for amending the coin, unless it were by actually cheating the ignorant ; and such appears to have been the real design. For, at the very time when a part of this wretched money was in preparation, the former coinage of this reign, and the latter coinage of the preceding reign, which, bad as they were beyond all former precedent, were twice as good as that now contemplated, were first cried down one-fourth, and afterwards one-half, making the shilling- current only for sixpence, and the groat for twopence. Thus the unsuspecting people were robbed of half their money on the plea of its baseness, whilst the government was at the same time plotting the issue of other money, the shilling of which, in comparison, was not worth more than threepence. The richer sort of people, according to Lanquet's Chronicle, had knowledge of these changes beforehand, *' and did put off their new light money, and kept in store none but good gold and old silver, that would not bring any loss," so that the chief loss fell on the lower orders. After the first reduction above mentioned, an apprehension currently prevailed, that another would soon follow, for which cause people refused to bring provisions to the markets, chusing rather to keep them than run the risk of being cheated out of the value of the money which they might receive in exchange for them ; in consequence of which, a great scarcity was presently felt. Whereupon a proclamation was issued, stating, that these effects arose "from false and untrue rumours, which were spread by certain lewd persons, who, of their own light heads, had imagined, that because the king had some- what abated the value of his coin, he should, therefore, more 48 abate it ;" and it proceeds to forbid his Majesty's subjects " to invent, speak, mutter, or devise any manner of tale, news, or report, either touching the abasing of the said coin, or that in anywise might sound, either to the dishonour of his Majesty's person, or the defacing of his or his council's pro- ceedings, or to the disquieting of his subjects, on pain of six months' imprisonment, and of such fine to his Majesty's use as his Majesty's justices of the peace should think fit." The offender was also to be liable to be put in the pillory, and to have one or both his ears cut off, at the discretion of the ma- gistrate ; and any person hearing such tale, news, and report, and not immediately revealing it to some justice, was to be subject to the like punishment. Even the magistrate was to be subject to the same punishment if he failed to fulfil the intention of the proclamation. About a month after this proclamation had been issued for stopping the ears and tongues of the people, the second re- duction was made. Such measures, accompanied with such professions, did more towards *' dishonouring his Majesty's person, and defacing the proceedings of his council, than the false and untrue rumours," as they were called, " of certain lewd persons." To aggravate the vexatious cruelty of these proceedings, it appears that some of the servants of the crown turned them to their private profit. The receiver for the county of York confessed that he gained 500/. at one crying- down, by borrowing 2000/., subject to the allowance of 3J. in the shilling, and then paying it into the exchequer at its old nominal value, which he was privileged to do as a receiver of the revenue. The foregoing events took place from April to August in 1551. In September it was determined that a coinage of silver should be issued of 11 oz. fine, and 1 oz. alloy, the pound weight to make 3/. sterling, whereby, as it is stated in the king's journal, five shillings in silver was to be worth five shillings in gold. Thus the relative value of gold to silver in 49 a mercantile view, had not been greatly disturbed by the un- equal value attempted to be given to them in the English coinage. By an indenture executed shortly after this, it ap- pears that a pound weight of metal, 1 1 oz. 1 dwt. fine silver, and 19 dwts. alloy, was coined into 3/, sterling. Whilst this improvement of the money w^as taking place in England, a measure was adopted towards Ireland, which would have been extraordinary if it had not already been seen that the practice of the time was to prepare for an '• amend- ment of the coin," by a system which would have been down- right swindling had it been practised by ordinary persons. According to the king's journal, it was, on the 18th of May, 1552, determined that money should be cried down in Ireland immediately after the Midsummer payments, and that in the mean time the thing should be kept secret : and on the 10th of June (the intention of the 18th of May being referred to) it was appointed that a considerable weight of metal which the king had in the Tower should be carried to Ireland, and there coined in a very base state, and that as soon as it was disbursed the coin should be cried down. In the mean time, the improved money of England had be- o-un to be issued, but it was no sooner issued than it was bought up at a premium with the old bad money, and either hoarded or exported. The merchants were accused by the king of loitering at home, and employing themselves in ex- changing money, and clandestinely conveying bullion out of the realm, instead of adventuring to bring in foreign commo- dities. The direct mode of preventing this would have been to suppress the circulation of the bad money altogether, but the doing so presented a choice of difficulties — the government must have taken it in, and given good money for it, themselves bearing the loss, or they must have thrown the loss at once upon the holders. The latter course would probably have caused a rebellion, considering the high state of excitement D 50 into which similar acts of injustice had recently wrought the minds of the people ; and the former alternative the govern- ment had not the means of adopting, or it would have been discovered that to prepare for the amendment of the coin by first grossly debasing it, was an expedient no less unprofitable than unprincipled. It was therefore deemed impossible to suppress the circulation of bad money ; and all that could be done was to enact various penalties to prevent the bad from absorbing the good money. Parties exchanging the good for more than its current value, were subjected to heavy fines and imprisonment. A short time previously money was so unworthy of being hoarded, that persons would employ it to great disadvantage rather than keep it ; now, however, it was so scarce, that ac- cording to the king's journal, the usual rate of interest was 14 per cent, per annum ; to counteract which the taking of usury was altogether prohibited by law. All this being insuf- ficient to make money more plentiful, the law of the 17 Ed- ward IV. was renewed, whereby it was made felony to carry any kind of money or plate out of the kingdom ; and gold- smiths and others were prohibited from using gold and silver for articles of luxury. The strictness with which it was designed to prohibit the export of gold and silver, is rendered apparent by the minute exception shortly afterwards made, viz. that merchants might take 41. in money with them for their ex- penses. These measures, however, were so far from rendering the circulation more abundant, that they rather produced the contrary effect, — as the greater was the anxiety of govern- ment to force the holders of coin to part with it, the greater would naturally be their inducement to keep it. The early death of Edward put a stop to further measures. 5i MARY. Through the short reign of Mary, good and bad money were allowed to circulate together under the royal sanction, pretty much as they had done before her accession to the throne. The queen made great professions of her intention to complete the reformation of the coin : notwithstanding this, her good money was of rather lower standard than that of the preceding reign ; and it also appears, that by her authority a considerable quantity of base money was coined and issued. The opportunity of reforming the coin was now, however, be- coming peculiarly favourable, in consequence of the diminu- tion of the mercantile value of silver in Europe, from the increased supplies derived from the New World. ELIZABETH. This sensible and spirited woman had both the ability and the will to avail herself of the favourable circumstances in which she was placed for bringing the silver money of Eng- land to a par with the gold money. As concerned her English dominions, she was alive to the advice of her counsellors when they told her that it was for the honour of the crown and the wealth of the prince and people to restore the standard to its ancient purity, *' and that it was not the short ends of wit nor starting-holes of devices that could sustain the expence of a monarchy, but sound and solid courses." This looked well in theory, and was attempted to be practised with respect to England ; but Ireland was still fated to endure the miserable consequences of a policy dictated by ^' the short ends of wit, and the starting-holes of devices." For whilst the queen's government were preparing to suppress the circulation of base monies in England, a commission was granted to the chief officers of the mint to coin 12,000 pounds of the base Enghsh d2 52 money into 20,000 pounds Irish ; and a further commission was afterwards granted, authorizing her majesty's money- makers to alter the base monies then current in England into harp shillings and groats, to be defrayed about the queen's affairs in Ireland — 4000/. of such money to be coined into 8000/. Irish, after the standard of 3 oz. fine silver to 9 oz. alloy — the pound troy to be coined into 40s. : so that a pound weight of fine silver, which in England was at this time worth about 3/. 5s. sterling;, in Ireland was to be worth 8/. By this device it is probable the knowing ones in England got rid of their base coin, so that when the base monies in England were cried down, the loss fell chiefly upon the more simple kind of folks. The shilling, or teston, which Edward had brought down to sixpence, was now reduced to fourpence halfpenny, the two- penny piece to three halfpence, and the penny to three far- things. Certain shillings which were marked with a lion, a rose, a harp, or a flower-de-luce, and which it was stated were so base and full of copper as to be easily known, were only to pass for twopence farthing. Probably these were the coins of 3 oz. fine and 9 oz. alloy, issued by authority of Edward the Sixth, and the counterfeits of that coinage. These twopence- farthing shillings, or testons, were only to be allowed to circulate even at this rate for four months ; and in the mean time the holders were invited to bring them and the other base monies to the mint, where they were to be exchanged after the above rates for good new money. As a further inducement to bring the old money to be exchanged for new, those who brought it to the Mint were to have threepence in the pound over the above rates. It was justly anticipated in the procla- mation announcing the above changes in money, that the coin would not go so far as formerly in the purchase of provisions, &c. To counteract this, all justices were commanded to punish those with speed and severity who should seek to ad- vance the accustomed price of victuals. 53 Immediately after the abovementioned proclamation was issued, reducing the value of the current coin, her majesty caused a summary of her reasons for the alterations to be pub- lished, wherein it is stated to be a truth well known, that " the honour and reputation of the singular wealth that this realm was wont to have above all other realms, was partly in that it had no current monies but gold and silver ; whereas, on the contrary, all other countries, as Almain, France, Spain, Flan- ders, Scotland, and the rest of Christendom, have had, and still have, certain base monies." But as the money of Eng- land had of late grown into infamy and reproach, it had there- fore been thought necessary that it should be recovered. And in the attainment of this end, as her majesty meant for her part to be at great charges, so every good English subject ought to be content, though it was some small loss to him at the first. As one consequence of the issue of this base money, the proclamation stated that counterfeiters, both at home and abroad, had uttered testons or shillings first for twelvepence, afterwards for sixpence, which were really not worth more than twopence ; and so, for small sums of money counterfeited, had carried out of the realm six times the value of it in rich com- modities — that although King Edward and Queen Mary had coined great quantities of gold and silver, yet no part thereof was seen in the currency, some being carried out, and some perchance hoarded hy the loiser sort, as it were to be ivished that the ivhole ivere. It was further alleged, that although the earth had been plentifully productive, yet that the price of things had risen immeasurably, and no remedy could be de- vised for reducing the same, but to reduce the base monies to their just value ; for, says her majesty, " every man of the least understanding knew that a teston was not worth sixpence, and therefore no man would give that which was, and ever had been, worth sixpence, for a teston, but rather would require two testons ; and so a thing being worth sixpence was bought and sold either for two tes- 54 tons, or one and a half, which was in reckoning twelve- pence or ninepence. Whereas, every teston being brought to its just value, it must needs follow that one shall buy that for four-pence halfpenny which was wont to cost six-pence ; so that what he may lose by the bad money, he will gain by the next good money he shall get. By this means the ex- change in favour of the monies of England shall rise in es- timation as formerly, and the foreign commodities be thereby bought for easier prices ; so that every man ought to thank God that he may live to see the honor of his country thus partly recovered from the privy thief, which is the counter- feiter." — The address did not fail to set forth the great bene- fit which was to arise from the reformation of money to all poor people living upon daily wages, all mean gentlemen who were living upon pensions and stipends, and all those living on soldier's pay, which being to be paid in good and fine monies, would therefore yield more necessaries for their sustentation than their wages formerly did. Such were some of the reasons which the cabinet of Queen Elizabeth addressed to the nation, to reconcile the people to the loss which this further reduction of the money threw "upon them. Two errors are especially to be noticed in the reasoning of this address : 1st. It is assumed that the value of silver in coin rests upon the same single principle of barter as if it were a mere mercantile commodity : and, 2ndly. It is supposed that the possessors of money would circulate it as freely in the employment of labour, when it was good enough to be hoarded, as when it was so bad as not to be worth keeping. Experience had shewn that the market price of silver in England had a natural tendency to approximate to the mint price ; but it had also shewn that, at least since the introduction of gold into the English coinage, the two prices were by no means the same. In 1544 (the 36th of Henry the Eighth) a proclamation announces the market price of fine silver to have been recently advanced to 4s. per oz. that is, 55 4s. in coin ; but an ounce of fine silver at that time coined into money was current for 4s. 8c?. In the course of the same year, whilst the market price was still 45. per oz., the king caused his coin to be composed of one half base metal, and yet its money value to be retained, so that fine silver, when coined, was then worth 8s. per oz., or double the market price. In the following year he further debased it so much, that an ounce of fine silver in coin was made worth 12s. Four years after this, when Edward the Sixth coined money so as to make 12s. in coin out of an ounce of fine silver, the market price of fine silver had risen to 5s. 4d. per oz. And two years after that, when the same king coined an ounce of fine silver into 1/. 4s. sterling, in ordei-, as it was said, to get means for paying off the national debt, defending the nation and amend- ing the coin, he then was obliged to offer 10s. of this money for an ounce of fine silver. This, no doubt, was somewhat above the previous market price, as a temptation to merchants to become the utterers of such base money ; but base and worthless as it was intrinsically, yet possessing the super- scription and stamp of the monarch of England, 10s. of it were made, at the time, to have the same value in an English payment as an ounce of fine silver ; the silver gaining in power from possessing the king's sanction, what it wanted in intrinsic purity. Thus it appears that whilst the value of silver uncoined is entirely dependent upon the principle of barter, the value of coined silver is made up partly of the mercan- tile value of the raw material, and partly of the royal sanc- tion, the relative quantity of each being varied according to the power, will, or necessities of the monarch. In the foregoing remarks it is seen that Henry the Eighth and Edward the Sixth made money with a large proportion of royal prerogative, and only a small proportion of pure metal. In after-times, when the power of James the Second was about to expire, we have an extraordinary instance of the extent to which this principle of constituting value might be carried. 56 By the threat of the halter, and the aid of the soldiery, he was enabled to make 10/. sterling with only four pennyworth of metal, the remaining 9/. 195. 8d. being all derived from royal power. As the failure of James to retain his crown constituted the proof that he had no right to exercise the kingly preroga- tive of coining money, so his successor did not feel himself bound to fulfil James's pledge to take it back for taxes at the rate at which it was issued. It was, therefore, immediately cried down ; the piece of money which tradesmen and others had been compelled to take for the half-crown was reduced to one penny, and the shilling to one farthing. But it may be questioned on what other principle than that of mere arbitrary- power, King Edward and Queen Elizabeth reduced the value of the teston. The teston was coined by Henry VIII. as a shilling, and was to pass for twelve pence. The proclamation of King Edward speaks of it as " the piece of twelve pence, called a teston ;" and, therefore, it had the same title, viz. the sanction of the acknowledged monarch, for representing twelve pence, as the penny had for representing one penny. But, admitting this, then the monarch who had paid them to the people for twelve pence, was bound in equity to take them again from the people at the same rate, for taxes, pre- vious to their value being reduced. The supposition that the possessors of money would part with it as freely when it was intrinsically good as they did when it was intrinsically bad, is made the foundation of the reasoning of that part of the address which was designed to show that poor people living on daily wages, mean gentlemen living upon pensions and stipends, and soldiers living on fixed pay, would be benefited by the change. Gentlemen, whether mean or noble, whether living upon pensions or annuities, or deriving their income from lands, whilst they could get their former revenues paid, would of course derive benefit from the increased value of money : soldiers also, whose pay proceeded directly from the prince, and only indirectly from the people, and whose services might be essential to enforce the payment of 57 the revenue, would not have their wages lowered according to the increased value of money ; it is no wonder, therefore, if the queen and her measures were popular with them. But poor people living upon daily wages, depending upon the voluntary employment of the more wealthy, would not find Elizabeth's golden promises so completely realized. On the contrary, the want of employment at adequate wages would be the natural consequence of an increased value of money then, in like manner as the same cause produces the same efi'ect now ; and this, together with the loss of subsistence previously derived from religious houses, probably caused the poor-laws, which Elizabeth established, to become imperatively necessary. Meanwhile the middle classes of society, such as farmers and tradesmen, were not much more equitably treated than the poor. Their commodities were liable to be valued by officers appointed by the government, and the owners were forced to part with them at a reduced rate ; for if prices had been allowed to remain nominally the same, then mean gentlemen and soldiers would have derived no benefit from the increased value of money : they were therefore lowered, so that a commodity accustomed to be sold for a teston, when it was valued at sixpence, should be sold for a teston, valued at fourpence halfpenny. But by this arrangement the producers or venders of the necessaries of life could not pay rent and taxes as before, and, consequently, stipends and annuities according to the old scale would fall off, whence the mean gentlemen and soldiers would be forced to lose in the nominal amount of their pensions as much as was given them in the improved specific worth of money. True, but by a sacrifice of capital on the part of the producers, or venders of the necessaries of life, the queen's promises to these gentlemen might for a time be realized ; and so they were. And upon the same principle a farmer, in modern days, having saved a thousand pounds, may pay, even for ten years, 58 100/. per annum, for rent and taxes, and other outgoings, more than the profit of his farm, before he himself comes to the parish. To the parish, however, he must come at last, and himself and family become a dead weight on the proprietor of the soil; or his rent and taxes must be lessened in the same degree that his receipts are diminished. By the same short-sighted policy which leads the poor me- chanic and labourer of the present day to expect that he shall continue to receive the same daily wages when provisions and clothing are low in price, as when they were high, the cabinet of Queen Elizabeth was certainly governed when it propounded the foregoing argument. Possessed of great power, and resolved to spare no pains in enforcing their decree that the prices of commodities should be regulated by magis- trates, and not by the buyer and seller, they might have suc- ceeded in their views, had success been possible. But upon former occasions, the like sapient policy had been adopted, until the market was so badly supplied with provisions that it was with difficulty enough could be obtained for the king's household ; and similar consequences ensued now. Stowe says, that in October 1563, London was visited with a three-fold plague — pestilence, scarcity of money, and dearth of victuals; and that Michaelmas term was not kept. These calamities, which came upon the nation almost as soon as the new coinage was completed, were the natural consequences of that measure, and of the steps by which it was accompanied. When money was made worth hoarding, and by restraints on profit capital was driven from employment, famine and sick- ness were sure to follow. In the new coinage the pound weight of gold of twenty- two carats fine, and two carats alloy, was made to represent 33/. Sovereigns were coined of this gold, to be current for 20s., which weighed seven pennyweights, six grains and a half. Gold of this quaUty is distinguished as the new standard. The old standard was twenty-three carats, three grains and a 59 half fine, and only half a grain alloy. Henry the Eighth was the first English monarch who debased it. In his eighteenth year, he caused the pound weight of gold of twenty-two carats fine, and two alloy, to represent 251. 2s. 6d., coining it into crown pieces, and not into nobles, angels, &.C., from which cir- cumstance it was afterwards called crown gold. In his thirty- seventh year, he further debased the standard to only twenty carats fine, and four carats alloy, and the pound weight was then to make 30/. This lowest standard was not continued ; but crown gold remained in use, and was sometimes distin- guished by writers as the new standard, and sometimes as crown gold. From the time of Henry the Eighth to Charles the First, the old and new standards were in use together, the value being adjusted according to their relative fineness. Since Charles I. crown gold has been the only standard. Elizabeth coined the pound weight of crown gold into 33/. and the pound weight of the old standard into 36/., which pro- portions were as nearly as possible equal to 30/. coined out of the pound weight of gold of 20 carats fine and 4 alloy ; so that Elizabeth valued gold in her new coin exactly the same as Henry the Eighth did in his basest coinage. In the value of gold money, therefore, Elizabeth virtually made no improve- ment. AH that she attempted was to restore the silver money to the same value, in relation to gold money, which it pos- sessed in the time of Henry the Seventh. She did not in- tend to restore the pound sterling either of gold or silver to the same weight and purity which it possessed in her grandfather's reign, as some may imagine, for in that case the pound weight of gold, of the old standard, must have made only 22/. 10s., and the pound weight of standard silver 1/. 17s. 6d.; but she did restore silver coin to the same value, in relation to gold, which it held in the reign of Henry the Seventh, by coining the pound weight of standard silver into 3/. sterling, which, in proportion to 36/., is precisely what I/. 17s. 6d. is to 22/. 10s. GO In thus restoring silver to the same relative value with gold money, which it bore in the reign of Henry the Seventh, Elizabeth flattered herself that she had settled the money ques- tion upon a lasting basis ; that " she had (as she expressed it,) conquered that monstei; which had so long devoured her people ;" but the subsequent History of England, and even that of Elizabeth's own reign, shews that though his power was checked, the monster was not annihilated. The queen was pledged by principle, by ambition, and by vanity, to keep the money of England upon the basis on which it was now placed, and she spared no pains to do it; but all her power and policy were inadequate to the task. Her credit was good, and she borrowed largely : the mines were also very productive, and the wealth of those who un- derstood the mystery of money was greatly on the increase ; but the coin in circulation was far below the necessities of the people. Its scarcity was indeed so great that the people were willing to take it however imperfect, and this opened a wide field for the practices of clipping and counterfeiting : clipped money accordingly soon formed a considerable part of the circulating medium of England, in defiance of all the se- verity used by the crown to check its progress ; and this caused the relative value of gold and silver, and the rate of exchange between England and foreign countries, to be disturbed. For though an English shilling or sovereign having lost somewhat of its coined weight, was fully adequate to discharge an Eng- lish obligation of one shilling or one pound ; yet their value against each other, and their foreign value, varied with every diminution of their original weight: and thus merchants and brokers were enabled to buy up the gold money of full weight with the current silver of diminished weight, and the silver money of full weight with current gold of diminished weight. So there were two standards to which the money was conformable ; one the legal coining standard, the other the current standard. The coining standard, after Eliza- 61 beth had restored the money, required 7 dwts. 6| grains of gold, of the same degree of fineness as our present sovereign, or twenty shiUings, each weighing 4 dwts, of silver of stan- dard fineness, to represent the pound sterling ; but the current standard was limited only by the lowest weight at which it was possible to get money into circulation. Under the sanc- tion of this double standard, therefore, the person who wanted to pay away money in the home market profited by selling his heavy gold and silver to the merchant, for which he received an increased numerical amount of current money in exchange, whilst the merchant had his profit in the foreign market, in the superior weight of the money which he bought. The na- tural effect of this traffic was to cause all the best gold and silver money to be abstracted from circulation as an article of merchandize rather than of currency ; and to render it impos- sible for the government to coin and issue money according to the legal standard, without being subjected to continual loss. Pressed with this difficulty, Elizabeth (notwithstanding her often repeated determination to preserve the standard invio- late) for some time secretly connived at the legal standard being departed from by the mint master ; and when in conse- quence of the officiousness of one of the officers of the mint, the variation betwixt the coinage and the indenture for coin- ing could no longer be concealed, she publicly announced that for great and urgent causes, she was compelledyb/- a short time to tolerate some deviation from the express words of the for mer indentures. This happened at the commencement of the 21st year of her reign, and to this day the short time is un- expired. The first departure from her original standard was appa- rently triflino;. It was ordered, that the pound weight of gold re- duced in purity by one quarter-grain more of alloy, should make 36/. I5. \Q\d.; and that the pound weight of silver with one dwt. more of alloy than the former standard, should make 3/. O5. 3(/. Trifling as this first alteration may appear to be. G2 it was important as to its cause and consequences. It clearly proved, that Elizabeth had not discovered the secret of settling for ever the money question. This evasive mode of com- bating the monster, (as she called the evils of the money sys- tem), was rather an acknowledgement of his invincibility; and before the conclusion of her reign, facts made it evident that he was still able to distress both prince and people. For the abuse of exchange, as the evil was denominated, had in the latter years of this queen's reign risen to such a pitch as to occasion a loss to England of 500,000/. annually, at least at that rate it was estimated in her 42d year, by the lord-keeper of the great seal, and the lord high treasurer : and yet in her 43d year the like evasive mode of meeting the evil was again had recourse to. It was then enacted, that the pound weight of gold should be coined into ten shillings more than the queen's original standard ; and the pound weight of silver into two shillings more. Thus terminated Elizabeth's attempt to make the money of England " always the same," in accord- ance with her motto. During this reign, the measures adopt- ed with respect to the currency of Ireland were of a character to rival for injustice the worst of those which Henry the Eighth and Edward the Sixth had adopted towards England, JAMES THE FIRST. The experience of Elizabeth's reign proved, that though she had power to restore the coinage at the commencement of her reign, by inflicting great injustice on the holders of the currency, it was beyond her ability to keep the coinage and currency at par. Her last attempt, in her 43d year, to make the mint value conformable to the current value of money, was presently found to be no more successful than that which had been made in her 21st ; for within four years after we find her successor King James, alleging in a proclamation, that the 63 relative value of gold to silver in England was imperfectly adjusted, and that he had therefore deemed it necessary to make a new coinage of gold, in which the pound weight of crown gold was coined into 37/. 4s., which is 3/. 14s. more than the last coinage of Elizabeth. A new name was also given to the piece of money representing the pound sterling : viz. an unit or nniti/ ; Queen Elizabeth called it a sovereign. The unit weighed only 6 dwts. 10| grains ; whilst the reduced so- vereign of Queen Elizabeth weighed 7 dwts. 4 grains. But the whole history of James's reign show s that this system was no more successful in his hands (largely as he was disposed to act upon it,) than in those of his predecessor ; neither w^as it likely that it should be successful. As well might a man expect to find his way in a foggy night by fol- lowing a Will-o'-wisp, as a king expect to find a fixed standard for his money, by acknowledging both a gold and a silver stan- dard, and by adjusting the weight and purity of his new coin to the weight and purity of the current money. The further this system is pursued, the further it must always lead astray. By following it the Scotch pound had, at that time, become reduced to twenty-pence of English money, and the French pound or livre to two shillings, (since which it has fallen to tenpence) ; yet the only alternatives James had, were to follow this ignis jatims, or to adopt the unjust expedients of former times for supplying the mint with the material for money. He chose the former, and accordingly reduced, in the second year of his reign, the gold representative of the pound ster- ling, from 7 dwts. 4 grs, to 6 dwts. 10| grs. Notwithstanding this large reduction in the weight of the gold pound, the scarcity of gold and silver soon afterwards became very great, wherefore taking it for granted that the money was exported, the king appointed a committee, in his eighth year, to inquire into the cause. The causes were re- ported to be these : the weight, the fineness of the standard, the relative value of the monies in gold and silver, and the 64 abuse of exchange for monies by bills, wherein all the former were included. This last, it is to be observed, was a new cause which had grown up in consequence of the credit that had now become attached to merchants' bills of exchange. The difference of weight, fineness, and valuation, the com- missioners declared were not true causes of exportation, if there were betwixt countries a due course holden in the ex- change of money ; but that due course not being observed, then they might accidentally become causes : that is to say, amongst merchants and buUionists, there is no reason why the weight, fineness, and relative value of one kind of metal money to another should not be understood and adjusted, as well on one side the English channel as the other, and if so, then no mercantile profit was to be got by the transport of it on ac- count of its weight and fineness, unless the usual course in the exchange of money were disturbed by some other cause. This was all good reasoning, but when they stated this dis- turbance to have arisen from an overbalancing of foreign commodities, increased by the immoderate use of them, and by neglect of setting the people on work, they only explained one difficulty by starting another. It was, however, represent- ed to the king as a fact, that the gold coin called the unit, which was current for a pound sterling in England, was valued in foreign parts at \L 2s. sterling. This effect was stated to have been produced by the increased importation of silver from America ; but the truth was, that though the silver standard in England had not been officially altered from the last standard of Elizabeth, yet it was virtually altered by the silver in circulation getting worn down or clipped, so that upon an average the unit was really equivalent to 22s. of the silver money, when both were brought to the goldsmith's scales, and determined by the relative value of the metals fairly rated. Instead, however, of restoring the silver money to its legal specific weight, which ought to have been the case, if the increased importation of it had caused the 65 derangement, James ordered that the gold money should be raised 10 per cent, in its numerical value, and that the unit should thenceforth be current in Eno-land for 1/. 2s. sterlino-, and all other gold monies in proportion. As this enhancement of gold went somewhat beyond the absolute difference in the mercantile value of gold and silver, the effect of it was for a time to bring gold to England, and to cause a comparative scarcity of silver, insomuch that it was in serious contemplation to alter the silver standard, so as that the pound weight should be coined into 66s. instead of 62s. ; but by the ad- vice of several eminent merchants this measure was suspended. By a new coinage of gold, which took place at this time, a new piece of gold was authorized to represent the pound ster- ling. Its weight was five pennyweights, twenty grains and a half. It was still called an unit ; but to distinguish it from the unit of 22s. value, its common appellation was a " Laurel," because the king's head upon it was surrounded by a laurel- wreath. Though by this coinage gold experienced a further trifling enhancement, viz. of 2s. Sd. in the pound weight, yet the pound sterling having now a distinct representative in gold (which it had not during the time that the old unit repre- sented 22s., for then the pound sterling had no other represen- tative than 20.S. in silver), the extra demand for silver for mer- cantile purposes was for a time checked. It was, however, only a temporary check ; for, in defiance of all the expedients which James and his councillors could adopt to prevent mer- chants and goldsmiths from giving better prices for the mate- rial of money than those held out by his majesty's mint, the scarcity of money in circulation became every day more se- verely felt. At the commencement of this reign, the money of Ireland, which had been of the standard of only three ounces fine to nine ounces alloy, was ordered to be made of the standard of nine ounces fine to three ounces alloy ; and the magistrates were required to see that the prices of provisions were adjusted t>. 66 this increased value of money, in like manner as had been done in England by Queen EUzabeth. As much confusion had arisen from the application of the word " sterling" to the improved Irish money, in consequence of his majesty having used that term in an ordinance, it was ordered that the word sterling should be utterly abolished in reference to Irish mo- ney, and that the shilling of Ireland should be called twelve- pence Irish, and not twelvepence sterling. CHARLES THE FIRST. Till this time, and especially during the reigns of Henry the Eighth, Edward the Sixth, Mary, and Elizabeth, it had been the lot of the people to bear all the evils arising out of a vacillating money system ; but now the tables were turned, and it became the fate of the king to suffer from it. We have already observed that James the First followed this shifting system whithersoever it would lead him ; the consequence of which was, that his son Charles inherited the crown under such embarrassment, that turn whatever way he would, he could not extricate himself. It is to be recollected, that from the time of Henry the Seventh, the strength of parliament had been rapidly on the increase. That monarch having the talent to render the power of parliament subservient to his personal avarice, fostered its growth. His son, Henry the Eighth, found the support of parliament very useful in liber- ating his crown from the inconvenient interference of the pope, and by availing himself of its aid, he infused further strength into its constitution. The succeeding reigns of Ed- ward the Sixth, Mary, and Elizabeth, were very favourable for the confirmation of that strength ; so that when Elizabeth had settled, as she thought, the principles upon which money was 67 thenceforth to be coined, she bound the crown to conform to a law for the coinage of money, which another power in the state was now in a fit condition to enforce. But aoainst such confor- mity to the legal principles which governed the coinage, those practical principles, which regulated the currency, formed a natural and insurmountable impediment. Instead, therefore, of Elizabeth having by her money laws destroyed the money- monster, as she vainly hoped, their establishment had, in fact, only tended to bring both prince and people more decidedly beneath its grasp. It was the fate of Charles the First to afford melancholy proof of the truth of this assertion. Inheriting with his father's kingdom his father's debts, and being involved in a foreign war, he found his occasions for money soon surpass all common means of supply. His first expedient was to enhance the value of both gold and silver in coin. Accord- ingly, in his second year, a commission, bearing date the 14th of August, was granted for coining the pound weight of silver into 3/. 10s. 6d. sterling, and the pound weight of crown gold into 44/. The effects of this regulation would be, first, that all old monies, whether of gold or silver, would become mer- chandize, and thereby cease to circulate as mere currency ; and, secondly, that by the silver being enhanced much more than gold, the gold would be entirely bought up with silver by the bullion dealers. Such would seem to have been its imme- diate consequence ; for so early as the fourth of the following month, a proclamation was issued for the purpose of indirectly annuUino- the coinage under the commission of the 14th of Augrust. By that proclamation it was ordered, that all gold and silver monies should only be legally current in such species, and at such weights, fineness, and value, as the same were current at on the first day of August preceding ; and that all monies of gold and silver coined since the said first day of August, in any other manner than according to the proclamations which were in force upon that day, should be esteemed but as bullion, and E 2 68 not be current. Rapidly as these changes were made to take place, there can be no doubt that those who understood the mystery of money would be quick enough to make great advantage of them, at the cost of others who were ignorant of the consequences. By a commission for coining, bearing date the 7th of Sep- tember, the same regulations as to weight and fineness were returned to, which were in existence when Charles came to to the throne. But this little flirt (as it were) with the value of money, had taught the bullion dealers and the people gene- rally, to take good care of their old money ; so that the scar- city of it in circulation was increased ; and as from the repeated enhancements of the value of gold in its relation to silver since the time of Elizabeth, the silver money afforded rather more profit for foreign payments than gold, so it became a com- mon practice for bullion-dealers to cull the weightiest and best of the silver money (for which, according toKushworth's account, they gave a premium of two and sometimes three shillings in the hundred pounds), to melt and transport the same. The defi- ciency of silver money in relation to gold increased so much, " that the drovers and farmers, who brought cattle to Smith- field, would commonly make their bargain to be paid in silver; and it was usual to give twopence, and sometimes more, to change a twenty-shilling piece of full weight." After this, a large quantity of silver was, for some years, brought to the English mint to be coined, under an agreement which was entered into betwixt England and Spain : but instead of making money in general circulate more plentifully, it only caused the export or monopoly of gold to become profitable and practised ; till in the end, the foreign demand for English money, first silver, and then gold, aided by the monopoly at home, caused the want of coin in circulation to be- come an evil too great for the king to surmount. In 1639, his Majesty was made to feel his dependance upon parliament and the monied interests of the nation. In the 69 parliament which met at Edinburgh that year, it was de- manded of the king that the coin of the kingdom should not be meddled with but by the advice of parliament. This attempt to invade his prerogative, as his Majesty called it, he resisted in high terms, saying, " The coin is a prerogative most peculiar to the crown, and none can meddle with it but by our consent, without incurring the punishment of high treason, as it is in all kingdoms." But these were vain words, and only evinced, that in proportion as actual power is lost, the apparent owner is likely to become more than usually tenacious of its semblance. Charles presently found to his cost that he had no legal means of possessing himself of the material of money in quantities adequate to his wants, and that without this the prerogative of coining was an idle pri- vilege. To relieve himself from this difficulty, he notoriously broke those laws, the maintenance of which constitutes the es- sential condition on which an English monarch holds his crown. In the month of July 1640, he gave orders to seize upon the bullion in the Tower, which had been brought thither by merchants from abroad, to be coined. But not being- honest enough to stick to the right, nor yet wicked enough to persevere in a wrong cause, and finding that this unjust pro- ceeding would effectually prevent any more metal from being brought into the Tower, he was induced to release it on con- dition of one-third part, viz. 40,000A being lent to him. Thus the king lost the bulk of the money, and did not regain the confidence of the people. On the contrary, in a petition on the 24th of April following, by the citizens of London, a peti- tion subscribed, as it is said, by 20,000 persons of good rank and quality, it was stated, " that the stopping of the money in the mint, which, till then, was accounted the safest place and surest staple in these parts of the world, did still hinder the importation of bullion." Another scheme which Charles had recourse to for getting money, was such as, at the present time, would deprive a 70 common man of the benefit of the insolvent debtor's act : he became a trader, and bought on credit a large quantity of pepper, which he sold again immediately, for money, at a rate much under its value. He next wished to do as Henry the Eighth and Edward the Sixth had done, viz. to make a larger quantity of money out of the same quantity of silver. It was debated in council to mix silver and copper together, and to coin to the value of 300,000/. : the coin to be such, that three-pennyworth of silver, added to a certain quantity of copper, should be made current for one shilling. But herein he was made to feel his weakness. Sir Ralph Freeman, master of the mint, well knowing that parliament would be able and willing to make good the sentiments he expressed, declared to Lord Strafford that the servants of the mint-house would refuse to work the copper money, to which the earl is reported to have replied, *' Then it were well to send those servants to the house of correction :" and to the house of cor- rection, or something worse, both they and the master of the mint would have gone, if they had ventured to utter the like sentiments in the time of Henry the Eighth ; but the arbitrary power of the crown had now received a check, from which it could not recover, and was itself made to yield obedience to the supreme dominion of gold and silver. Charles having, in such instances as these, set at nought the sacredness of his own laws, was met by his opponents upon the common ground of mere natural power ; each party seeking its strength in the means it had of raising money. The two universities, and the king's party, supported the king with all their plate, and the great bulk of the people supported the parliament with all the bullion they could muster. Hu- dibras very justly called it the cause of gold and plate, and ridiculing the eagerness with which the people brought forth their gold and silver vessels, he says, — For when they thought the cause had need on't, Happy was he that could get rid on't. 71 Did they not coin pots, bowls, and flaggous, Into officers of horse and dragoons ? And into pikes and musqueteers Stamp beakers, cups and porringers? The result of the contest is well known. In 1647, parliament having resolved to stop the circulation of clipped money, ordered that it should only be received as bullion ; but this regulation was not to apply to old monies which had grown light through wear. In proportion, however, as the intrinsic value of the coin was increased, the inducements to circulate it were dimi- nished, and the parliament became so distressed for money wherewith to pay the army, that they gave orders to seize the public treasuries of Goldsmiths', Weavers', and Haberdashers' Halls. And notwithstanding twenty milhons of money were coined within twenty-five years, according to the mint books, it was almost all transported or melted down ; so that weighty gold, as a writer of that time observes, was as precious in the kinodom as diamonds. OLIVER CROMWELL. Cromwell was indebted to a lucky accident for the means of fixing the powers of government absolutely in himself. Three Hamburgh ships, having 300,000/. in silver on board, had been detained upon suspicion that it was the property of the Dutch. Cromwell hearing of the silver, ordered a detach- ment of soldiers on board, and seized it. Having thus pos- sessed himself of money, he was emboldened to take upon himself the right to dissolve the parliament. The grand secret of Cromwell's policy appears to have been, with money to govern the army, and with the army to govern the people ; and thus governing the people by mere military power, he 72 was provided with the means of getting money, or the material of money, wherever it was known to exist. The alienation and sale of church and other property, was also a fertile source of revenue to him ; and for the few years that this system con- tinued, there was such an increased quantity of money in cir- culation, as justified a remark made afterwards by Lord Lucas, that in the time of the late usurping powers, though the taxes were great, the means which people had of obtaining money were great also. But these modes of creating supplies could not last long ; they would do for an emergency only, and the time would inevitably come when such summary means of making a reve- nue would as suddenly fail : this, however, was a state of things for which Cromwell's death saved him the necessity of pro- viding. In the meantime, the people had seen enough of the system to make them wish for a change ; and a recurrence to the laws for the protection of property was gladly hailed by all parties. CHARLES THE SECOND. No sooner was the constitution re-established by the re- storation of Charles, than scarcity of money became again the bane both of the prince and of the great bulk of the people ; and recourse was again had to various arbitrary and oppres- sive enactments in hopes of a remedy. The exportation of gold and silver was absolutely forbidden, until it was disco- vered that this regulation was better calculated to check their importation than to prevent their being sent out of the country. So far did this zeal exceed the bounds of common sense, that it was foolishly thought the making of gold and silver wire and lace, and the gilding of carriages, &c., were the cause of the scarcity, and therefore prohibitory laws were enacted against the free exercise of those trades. But 73 all these regulations were to no purpose. The disease was not understood, and it is therefore no wonder that the remedy was not efficient. Those who had the means of monopolizing the precious metals felt it to be their interest to monopolize them, and private traders could afford to give higher prices for bullion in current light money, than his majesty's mint could afford to give in new coined money ; so the mint was badly supplied with the material, his majesty was ill supplied with money, and the great bulk of the people who wanted coin for the mere purposes of circulation, were crippled in all their transactions, whilst in the coffers of the great capitalists there was abundance. The pernicious political bearing of such a state of things was well illustrated by Lord Bacon, in that remark of his which forms the motto of our title- page. The scarcity of money still continuing, the government was forced to adopt the old expedient of diminishing the specific value of the pound sterling ; and here was at once a good profit for the capitalists. The old unit (the coined weight of which was six pennyweights, ten grains and three-quarters) which King James had coined at the commencement of his reign to represent the pound sterling, but which he after\vards ad- vanced to 1/. 2s., was now ordered to represent II. 3s. 6d., and the new unit or laurel (the coined weight of which was five pennyweights, twenty grains and a half) was enhanced to 11. Is. 4d. In two or three years after this enhancement, the guinea (so called from the gold of which it was first made being brought from the coast of Guinea) weighing five penny- weights, nine grains and a half, was coined for the purpose of giving a new gold representation to the pound sterling. This end, however, was not attained, for tn^ guinea, reduced as it was in weight from the old 205. piece, was no sooner issued than it bore to the current silver the relative value of 20s. 6d. From that time the old unit of both sorts received the name of broads oi" broad-pieces. This enhancement of the value of gold being found inadequate to the proposed end, a law was 74 shortly afterwards passed by which the state undertook to defray the whole expense of the coinage, so that those who brought bullion to the mint were to be entitled to receive it back in current coin without any deduction whatever: a tax was imposed upon wines, vinegar, cyder, and beer imported, for the purpose of defraying the expense. Had this regulation of the coinage been accompanied with any measure that could have checked the material of money from being monopolized, its effects would have been beneficial ; but for want of such a principle of counteraction, its effect was to bring the circulating medium of the kingdom more than ever under the control of bullionists and merchants. The following extract shews what was thought of it at the time. " Sir Dudley North was infinitely scandalized at the folly of this law, which made bullion and coined money par, so that any man might gain by melting ; as when the price of bullion riseth, a crown shall melt into five shillings and sixpence ; but on the other side, nothing could ever be lost by coining ; for, upon a glut of bullion, he might get that way too, and upon a scarcity melt again ; and no kind of advantage, by increase of money, as was pretended, like to come out. " The reasons why the scheme prevailed were, first, that the crown got by the coinage duty ; next, that the goldsmiths, who gained by the melting trade, were advancers to the trea- sury, and favourites. " The country gentlemen are commonly full of one profound mistake, which is, that if a great deal of money be made, they must of course have a share of it ; such being a supposed con- sequence of what they call plenty of money. So little do men follow the truth of things in their deliberations ; but shallow, unthought prej udices carry them away by shoals. In short, the bill passed, and the effects of it have been enough seen and felt ; however the evil hath been since in some sort, but not wholly, remedied." — Life of Sir Dudley North, p. 179. 75 In the year following that in which the coinage was made free from seignorage, goldsmiths and brokers found it profit- able to buy up with gold the weighty silver pieces, such as dollars and pieces of eight, which it is said they could buy for 5s. 3^. a piece ; but instead of bringing them to the mint to be coined, they sent them to France, to Ireland, and to Scotland, where their relative value in payments to the cur- rent but lighter silver in England was such as to yield a very considerable profit. In 1670 such continued to be the scarcity of money, that when the subsidy bill for granting one-twentieth of all estates was read a second time in the House of Lords, his Majesty being present. Lord Lucas spoke to the following effect. He began by stating that all those hopes had been disappointed, under the impression of which his Majesty had been recalled to the exercise of the regal power ; that the burthens of his subjects, instead of being lightened, had been increased, whilst their strength to support them had been diminished ; that in the times of the late usurping powers, though the taxes were great, yet there was plenty of money throughout the nation to pay them with ; " but now," continued his lordship, " there is nothing of this ; brick is required of us, and no straw is allowed to make it with. For that our lands are thrown up, and corn and cattle are of Uttle value, is notorious to all the world. And it is as evident that there is a scarcity of money ; for all the parliament money called Breeches, a fit stamp for the coin of the Rump, has wholly vanished ; the king's procla- mation and the Dutch have swept it all away ; and of his now Majesty's coin there appears but very little ; so that, in effect, we have none left for common use, but a little lean coined money, of the late three former princes ; and what supply is preparing for us, my lord ? I hear of none, unless it be of cop- per farthings ; and this is the metal, according to the in- scription upon them [the farthings], ' Quatuor maria vindico' that is to vindicate the dominion of the four seas." 76 Sir W. Petty, speaking of the extreme scarcity of money in Ireland about this time, says, it would have been easier for the Irish labourer to have contributed forty-nine days' labour for the use of the state, if taken at seasonable times in the course of the year, than to raise two shillings for his hearth tax at one period, and just when the collector called for it. This extremity of hardship appears to have been produced by the narrow policy of the British government. The agricultural interest in England suffering greatly from the scarcity of mo- ney, was caiTied away with the impression that the introduc- tion of Irish cattle into the English market was the cause of the farmers' distress ; and parliament was accordingly in- duced to prohibit the importation of Irish cattle into England, though at the same time a considerable part of the army of Ireland was subsisting in England, the expense of which was to be paid for by Ireland. Under these circumstances, to furnish the sums that were demanded, Ireland was obliged to send her goods to distant parts of the world, to Barbadoes for instance, where an exchange was made for sugars, and the sugars being remitted to England, discharged the obligation ; but at such great charges to Ireland, that whilst they had any money left, the payment was of course made in money. With these facts before him, it is surprizing that Sir W. Petty should have maintained the following sentiments on absenteeism without some further qualifications. They are of such old standing, and yet so closely agree with those which have recently excited a good deal of attention, that we are tempted to transcribe them : " Many think," says Sir W. P., " that Ireland is much impoverished, or at least, the money thereof much exhausted, by reason of absentees, who are such as having lands in Ire- land, do live out of the kingdom ; and do therefore think it just that such, according to former statutes, should lose their said estates. "Which opinion I oppose as both unjust, inconvenient, and 77 frivolous. For, first, If a man carry money or other effects out of England to purchase lands in Ireland, why should not the rents, issues, and profits of the same return into England with the same reason that the money of England was dimi- nished to buy it. " Secondly. Suppose one quarter of the land of Ireland did belong to the inhabitants of England, and that the same lay all in one place together, why may not the said quarter of the whole land be cut off from the other three, and sent into Eng- land, were it possible so to do ? And if so, why may not the rents ofthesamebe actually sent, without prejudice to the other three parts of the interessor thereof? " Thirdly. If all men were bound to spend the proceed of their lands upon the land itself, then, as all the proceed of Ireland ought to be spent in Ireland, so the proceed of one county in Ireland ought to be spent in the same, of one barony in the same barony, and one parish and manor ; and at length it would follow, that every eater ought to avoid what he hath eaten upon the same turf where the same grew, &c. &c." The above reasoning would be perfectly fair if commerce were perfectly free, and if some natural law were in existence to prevent money from being monopolized by states or indi- viduals, to the prejudice of other states and other individuals. But whilst a nation is liable to fulfil its engagements, not in produce, but in metallic money, and that money is liable to be limited in amount, and checked in its free circulation, some- times by natural causes, and at other times by the arbitrary enactments of a neighbouring state, or by the secret monopoly of some great capitalists, then the experience of Ireland shews that it may, according to the facts already quoted on Sir W. Petty's authority, be easier for an individual to contribute forty-nine days' labour to the use of the state in the course of the year, than to give the small sum of two shillings in money. We have had experience of this in our own day. 78 Towards the latter end of Charles the Second's reign, it was proposed to coin farthings of tin. But the farmers of the scheme would not undertake it without his Majesty agreed to their supplying England, Ireland, and the Plantations. The design was opposed by the officers of the mint as a gross fraud ; and when it was represented to his majesty that he must expect ultimately to receive his revenue of excise in them, and the Duke of York his postage, the intention was abandoned. JAMES THE SECOND. The ruinous course of an absolute money system which brought every thing of value under the control of those who could govern the precious metals, was now rapidly tending to a crisis. Charles the Second died February 6, 1684 — 5, and on December 23, 1688, James abdicated the throne, and went to France. In March following he came into Ireland, and immediately raised the current value of the guinea to 245. and other coins in proportion. This expedient failing to sup- ply him with a sufficiency of money, he coined brass and cop- per sixpenny-pieces for the purpose, as was stated in the pro- clamation, of remedying the scarcity of money in Ireland, of better subsisting his army, and of enabling his subjects the better to pay and discharge the taxes, excise, customs, rents, and other debts and duties, which were, or should be here- after payable to his majesty. He continued to debase the money more and more, till at length a pound weight of mixed metal, which cost him fourpence, was coined into money re- presenting near 10/. sterling. The people were compelled, under severe penalties, to take this base money in liquidation of engagements entered into on the faith of receiving good regular money. The soldiers were paid their wages in it, and 79 tradesmen were obliged to receive it for goods and debts. The governor of Dublin, the provost marshal and his deputies, threatened to hang up all that refused it. Though James had repeatedly pledged the royal authority that the base money thus paid should be ultimately redeemed by good coin, yet, as soon as the battle of the Boyne had taken place, whereby he was finally dispossessed of his kingly title, a proclamation was issued by William III., assigning to the currency of his predecessor a value in payment upon a par, or nearly so, with the market value of the metal of which it was made, so that the large half-crown of King James was at once reduced to one penny, and the large copper shilling to one farthing. It is computed that 6 or 7000/. worth of metal had been made to represent upwards of 2,000,000 of money, of which only 22,000/. was found in the mint when Jaines fled from Ireland: the loss, therefore, to those who had been com- pelled to take this money must have been very considerable. WILLIAM AND MARY. The commencement of this reign was distinguished by an extraordinary scarcity of money in England, and an inquiry was instituted to ascertain the cause. In a petition to the House of Commons, dated April 9, 1690, from the working goldsmiths of London, it is stated that the Jews and mer- chants were in the habit of giving for silver three halfpence per oz. above the mint price ; and that the melting down of plate and milled monies was so encouraged by this, that the petitioners were deprived of the means of carrying on their trade, and the mint stopped from coining ; and that since the preceding October, 286,102 ounces of silver bullion, and 89,949 dollars had been entered at the Custom-house for exportation by private persons. This statement was fully corroborated by 80 the report of the committee of the House of Commons, on the 8th of the following month, which assigns as the reason for this exportation, that the French king, finding money very scarce in his dominions, had raised the value of silver in coin ten per cent : that is, a person who owed money in France, or wanted to purchase goods there, was from that time permitted to dis- charge a debt of 1 10/. sterling, with such a given quantity of standard silver as up to that time would only have been equi- valent to 100/. sterling. But the like enhancement was not made in the value of gold, and therefore it was in relation to gold money, and to credit or existing money contracts in France, that the silver money was thus enhanced ; in like man- ner as thrice in the same century the same thing had been done in England, only ithad been done here in favour of the gold currency. Notwithstanding this enhancement of the value of silver in France, the old silver standard was continued in England ; so in order to turn that newmea sure of France to a profita- ble account, the dealers in money, especially the Jews, sent the gold to England, where they could exchange it for crown pieces and other silver money of full weight, and with this silver they were enabled to take the full private benefit of the French king's measure. The profit resulting from this course of exchange was such, that in a very short time England was drained of many hundred thousand ounces of her best silver money. It is to be observed, however, that whilst English sil- ver was current abroad only by weight, in England it was current by tale, constituting a legal tender to an unlimited extent. When it was afterwards limited, the law permitted that to the amount of 25/., silver, however light, having the appearance of being genuine, should be a legal tender. The traffic in silver was therefore not limited to the exchange of gold for it ; but a farther opening for private profit was found in the exchange of light silver for heavy ; thus, if with twenty-one light shillings the dealer could buy four crown 81 pieces of full weight, for which he could in France obtain value, at the rate of twenty-two shillings, according to weight' whilst the person who took the twenty-one light shillings could pay them in England by tale for one shilling more than the four crown pieces were authorized to be paid for ; both these parties, it is obvious, would gain profit by the transaction, at the expense of the public at large. The better part of the English silver currency being thus made to bear a premium over the inferior part, and yet the inferior part constituting a legal tender, the exchange betwixt light and heavy silver be- came a profitable trade, and there resulted from it a greater scarcity of silver currency in England than had previously been felt in France. The better part of it being continually carried off either for hoarding or for exportation, any thing, at last, that bore a resemblance to the English silver currency was tolerated in the circulation ; and so light and bad was it, that there were half-crowns then current which were jocularly said to be 7s. 6d. too light ; by which was meant, that one being put into the scale, it required the addition of three others of the same sort , to make up the weight which that one half- crown ought by the standard to have been. Thus England had a legal standard for silver, which required that 62 shil- lings should weigh a pound troy, and yet an authorized cur- rency, of which it might take 120 shillings or more to make a pound troy. England being then engaged in war, suffered very greatly from this derangement of her currency. The money which was collected in taxes by tale, and which, from the scarcity of money thus artificially created, cost the people nearly as much labour to get, as it had formerly done when the coin was of proper weight, was obliged to be paid for the support of our army abroad by weight. For though we might chuse to call 20 light shillings a pound sterling at home, and oblige ourselves by law to receive them as such from each other, and in discharge of any debt from abroad, yet we could not per- F 82 suade the Dutch to submit to the like conditions : on the con- trary, the pound sterling, which in the beginning of the war was equivalent to 43 Dutch schellings, now became gradually lowered (owing to the diminished quantity and character of that money, by which in England the pound sterling was lia- ble to be represented,) till a.t length it was only deemed equi- valent abroad to 28 Dutch schellings. With a view to force good silver money into circulation, severe punishments were denounced against those who should exchange a given quantity of the better sort for a larger quan- tity of the inferior. But instead of this measure forcing the better part of the silver into circulation, the immediate effect of it was to cause the barter in money which heretofore liad gone on directly betwixt perfect and imperfect silver, to be thenceforward carried on indirectly through the medium of gold. For now those who possessed heavy silver, even if it were of full weight, could only pass it legally in England for 20 shillings to the pound sterling ; whereas, with 22 shillings of silver full weight, they could and might legally purchase a guinea, and for this guinea they could readily obtain 29 or 30 shillings of the current light silver, and 20 shillings of this light silver, as before observed, was a legal tender for a pound sterling, in any payment under the amount of 25/. ; so that (according to Burnet) from the time that the direct exchange of perfect for imperfect silver was prohibited by law, the guinea was deemed equivalent to 30 shillings. Mr. Ruding, in speaking of this period, in the Annals of the Coinage, says : " For a long time, both the government and the people had beheld their specie, as it were, melting away before their eyes, and almost every man was become, in some way or other, a robber of the public ; for he who neither debased nor dimi- nished it, yet either hoarded or sold what fell into his hands undebased or undiminished." And quoting Ralph's History of England, he adds, " The opposition writers of the time I 83 asserted that the remittances for the charge of the war every year, carried out of the kingdom from a million and a half to two millions of money, either in specie or bullion, which was the same thing ; that all this wealth not only centered in Hol- land, but was negociated there a thousand ways to our preju- dice ; that as our coin degenerated from bad to worse, they either refused to take it at all, or took it by weight, which gene- rally reduced the value to half its denomination ; that the heavy Joart of it they first clipped as close as possible, and then remitted it hither again, where it was current by tale ; that the light they melted down, and debased into their own schellings, which became the currency of the army, and by which they had all the profits of the coinage, &c. ; that they prevented the Bank of England from erecting a mint in Flan- ders, &c. ; that a great part of our base coin was minted in Holland, and from thence obtruded upon us ; that after hav- ing beat down the value of our guineas abroad to nineteen shillings sterling, [this of course means in relation to shillings as they ought to be], they remitted them to England, where they were current for thirty shillings, [that is, such shillings as thei/ were] ; that all foreign gold, rising in value in exact proportion to this rise upon guineas, they took the advan- tage to buy up our grain and manufactures with it, and thereby enabled themselves, at our loss, to forestall and under- sell us in all the markets of Europe." All this was not the mere exaggerated statement of the opposite party, as is shewn by Mr. Ruding, who represents the Chancellor of the Exche- quer and his party as alleging officially the like truths, viz. " That by reason of the ill state of the coin, the exchange abroad was infinitely to the nation's prejudice. *' That the supplies that were raised to maintain the army, would never attain their end, being so much diminished and devoured by the unequal exchange and exorbitant premiums, before they reached the camp. f2 84 " That this was the unhappy cause that the guineas ad- vanced to thirty shillings, and foreign gold in proportion. " That therefore to the nation's great loss, not only the Dutch, but indeed all Europe, sent that commodity to this market, and would continue to do so, till the nation should be impoverished and undone by plenty of gold. " That we must exchange for their gold our goods, or our labour, till at last we should have only guineas to trade withal ; which nobody could think our neighbours would be so kind as to receive back at the value they were here. " That therefore the disease would every day take deeper root, infect the very vitals of the nation, and if not remedied, would soon become incurable." These, be it observed, are the declarations of the ministerial party at that time. After this description of the disease which afflicted England, let us advert to the remedies which were suggested for its cure. All seemed to agree that a recoinage of the silver was ne- cessary ; the question was, how and upon what terms it was to be made. The Chancellor of the Exchequer and his party contended that a recoinage of the silver currency ought to be effected agreeably to the old standard, viz. 5s. 2d. per ounce. The party in opposition maintained that the recoinage ought to be made at the rate of Qs. 3