OUR DUTY TO THE HOUSE OF GOD A SERMON PREACHED IN AID OF THE RESTORATION OF THE PARISH CHURCH OP J>t 09argarct , £, 3£>c£tmin£tct On SUNDAY, Nov. 12, 18 70 BY THE REV. F. W. FARRAR, D.D., F.R.S. CANON OF WESTMINSTER ; RECTOR OF SAINT MARGARET'S J LATE FELLOW OF TRINITY COLL., CAMBRIDGE ; AND CHAPLAIN IN ORDINARY TO THE QUEEN PUBLISHED BY BEQUEST Jjrinteb bn SPOTTISWOODE & CO., NEW-STREET SQUARE, LONDON 1876 All who read this Sermon are earnestly requested to help in gaining the requisite funds, which will be grate- fully acknowledged by the Rev. Canon Farrar, D.D., St. Margaret's Rectory, Westminster. SERMON. ' And who then is vdUing to consecrate his service this day unto the Lord T — 1 Chron. xxix. 5. It has been, my friends, in all ages an instinctive feel- ing with men who had any sense of religion that tt should do their very utmost for the Temples of their wor- ship. Even among our savage forefathers the huge stoix z of Druidic circles, dragged over distances of many miL s with infinite labour, show that, since they could not com- mand splendour, they would at least furnish to their sacred places the grandeur of massiveness, the evidence of toil. The Temples of Egypt were approached through avenm graven obelisks and granite kings. The Temples of Babylon towered stage above stage, and story above story, amid their hanging gardens, up to the huge altar that crowned the giddiest height. The Temples of Assyria glowed with the images of the Chaldeans, gorgeous hoi men on goodly horses. The Temples of Greece shone with the white marble of Pentelicus, and charmed the eye with the living processions of their incomparable sculpture. The Temples of Hindostan are inlaid with ivory and mosaic, till they gleam far away like opals in the burning sunlight. The Mosques of Islam are splendid with inscrip- tions and arabesques. Every creed, every nation, above the savage, has deemed it at once a duty and a pleasure to Lavish its riches on the House of God. 2. Perhaps, however, you will say that this was a part of idolatry. Well, there was one place of worship of which God himself furnished the plan and inspired the architect. It was reared by a nation of fugitive slaves in l he barren wilderness. There, at least, might have been Mime excuse for utter simplicity and absence of ornament. Was it so ? The Book of Exodus will give the answer : 6 Thus saith the Lord, of every man that giveth willingly, with his heart, shall ye take my offering' — gold, and silver, and blue, and purple, and scarlet, spices, sweet incense, onyx stones — ' and let them make me a Sanctuary.' And when that became too mean for a wealthier nation, read what David prepared in these chapters of Chronicles : 3000 talents of gold of Ophir, and 7000 talents of refined silver to overlay the walls, and stones of divers colours, and glistering stones, and all manner of precious stones, and marble in abundance ; and the people, you are told, offered willingly, and rejoiced in the nobleness of their own liberality. And when, in its turn, that Temple, de- st roved by Nebuchadnezzar, was rebuilt by Zerubbabel, the old men wept because in their poverty they could not equal the past magnificence. And, centuries afterwards, Herod the (iieat knew no such way to win the hearts of the people .- I.v decorating their Temple. Forty and three years was it /*"% „ UIUC r •A** / in building, and on the very last day of His public ministry the Apostles asked Jesus to gaze at it. They called attention to its nine gates, rich with precious metals ; those towering porches ; those bevelled monoliths so astonishing hTtheir massiveness ; those alternate blocks of red and white marble, recalling the crest and hollow of the sea-waves; those vast clusters of golden grapes which twined their splendid luxu- riance over golden doors ; that platform crowned with build- ings which, with its marble whiteness and glittering roofs, looked like a mountain whose snowy summit was gilded by the sun. It was true that the Temple was nothing without sincerity of worship ; and no gold or marble — no brilliant vermilion or curiously carved cedar-wood — no delicate sculpture or votive gems could change for the heart of Jesus a cave of robbers into a House of Prayer. Yet that was the Temple in which, at Jerusalem, He had always taught. Though His own mortal body was, in a sense infinitely higher, the Temple of Clod; though He might have taught on the green declivities of Olivet with His feet among the mountain lilies and the blue canopy of Heaven above His head ; though the whole outer world was to Him a Temple not made with hands, wherein winds and fires play the part of angelic ministers ; yet the Lord of the Temple came to the Temple of the Lord ; He recog- nised the solemnity of chambers consecrated by recurring ordinances, and honoured the Holy Places where the very air breathed and burned with songs and supplication. 3. But perhaps again you will say that the Temple was Jewish ; that Christianity introduced a purer ideal ; 6 that the need for splendour ceased when, neither in this mountain nor vet in Jerusalem, but in all places men might worship the Father in Spirit and in Truth. Well, but — 2 in I ask— is it so? At first, indeed, Christians were forced to worship anywhere: on the bare heath, in the mouldering catacomb, in the seaworn cave. And let us freely admit that, where better is not to be had, there the barest walls of the ugliest room may serve as well as though they were inlaid with sapphires, and the floor of the lowliest cottage be sacred as though it were the rocks of Sinai to kneelers' knees. But where men have the means they are not, they ought not to be content with niggard Churches. When kings became the nursing fathers of Christianity and queens her nursing mothers, how glo- rious at once became the shrines and basilicas which rose in honour of God and of the saints. Enter the Cathedrals of Italy, with their imperishable mosaics; see St. Mark's, at Venice, glowing like an illuminated Bible with immortal picturings ; nay, step but into the neighbouring Abbey, with its solemn aisles, its high-embowered roofs, its marble floors, its painted windows ; and there, in these days, when too often ' the honour of God is thought to consist in the poverty of His Temple, and the colour is denied to the casement and the marble to the altar, while wealth is exhausted in the luxury of boudoirs and the pride of reception rooms,' read, in that epic poem of Gothic archi- tecture, that our forefathers were more generous than we, and that 1 They dreamt not of a perishable home "Who thus could build.' 4. But perhaps even still some one will object that ' God does not need our liberality.' My friends, an igno- rant dogmatist once remarked depreciatingly to a learned divine, that God had no need of human wisdom. ' Sir,' was the answer, ' if God has no need of human wisdom, He has still less need of human ignorance'; and I say that, if God does not need our liberality, still less does He need our meanness. He who sculptured the great moun- tains, and studded the heavens with stars, and made the curtains of sunset flame with unimaginable gold ; He who pencilled with scarlet and crimson the petals of wayside blossoms, and gave such exquisite opalescence to the little pearly shell upon the sands, can gain nothing, it is true, from the poor magnificences of human art. But what is nothing as respects His glory is much as respects our love ; and be the offering much or little, God loves, God accepts, God, I say boldly, will reward the devo- tion which gives the best we have. To hear some men argue, one would think that anything beyond lath and plaster, bare roof and wooden floor, were too good for the ministry of the Sacraments and the preaching of the Word. My friends, where this mean spirit triumphs there will never be the beauty of holiness and the seat of religion. It was not the mighty spirit of self-sacrifice which made David waste on the barren sand the precious water from the well of Bethlehem. It was not the spirit of the penitent woman who broke the alabaster box of spikenard very precious, to pour it on Jesus' weary feet. It ivas the sullen spirit of the traitor Judas, who knew nothing of the truth that it is more 8 blessed to give than to receive. Oh, believe me, that the Church which, as St. Chiysostom says, is s the place of angels and archangels, the Court of God, and the image of heaven,' is not to be built, is not to be decorated, in the spirit in which we build a manufactory or a ware- house. The rich can show taste enough, luxury enough, in their own houses ; there they grudge literally no expense which may surround them with fair colours and noble associations : are we, then, to suppose that He who filled with His treasures the lap of earth meant them to be squandered only on our own gratification, while He reserved for Himself the unlovely and the vile ? If I read the Bible aright, I say that where the heart is noble, where the affections are generous, where the devotion is sincere, there all that is loveliest in art, in the sound of instruments, in the voices of men and women, will be gladly given, nay lavished, in God's service, that, out of the gratitude of full hearts, we may add some little unto Him who has given so much to us. 5. My friends, if these remarks be just, if these thoughts be true — and I know that they are true — what must be our feelings when we look roimd us at this House of God ? It was once as fair as it still is famous. Almost, if not quite, the oldest Parish Church in England ; built by St. Edward the Confessor ; rebuilt by Edward the First : improved by Edward the Fourth ; the Mother Church of all the Churches west of Temple Bar ; a sister of the great Abbey ; the Church where Caxton and Raleigh lie buried, where Milton was married, where Palmerston was baptised ; the Church where, with uplifted hands, the Parliament of England swore to the Covenant ; where almost every famous divine since the days of the Tudors — Latimer, Lightfoot, Cudworth, Baxter, Stillingfleet, Sancroft, Til- lotson, Atterbury, Tenison, and hosts of others down to the days of Milman and Melville — have officiated and preached ; the Church of the House of Commons mentioned repeatedly in English history, with an East Window which was a present of the Town of Dort to Henry VII. and is the unique memorial of his son Prince Arthur ; I sav unhesitatingly, no Church in London, no Church in England, can even approach it in the celebrity of its memories, in the stateliness of its associations. And it was once beautiful. These arches are of exquisite pro- portion, and its true outlines, when its defacements are swept away, are elegant and spacious. Those deface- ments are due partly to the very dullest epoch of architectural incompetence, and partly to the very deadest age of religious life ; when vulgarity triumphed over spirituality ; when houses of God were constructed in contemptuous defiance of every true principle of religion ; when, in fact, a Church, instead of being regarded as a beautiful and holy place, inspiring in all who enter it the two solemn thoughts, Pemember God and Pemember Death, was regarded as an assembly-room for the fashionable, with pew-doors and a pulpit. I say distinctly that this Church, with its wasted space and buried pews, is incomparably more ugly and incomparably worse for purposes of worship than the Church of many a nameless 10 village on the hills or in the fens. And just consider the state and appearance of it. Of its exterior — wretched is it- western porch — I will say nothing; but of its interior judge for yourselves. Are you not distressed — I can only Bay that 1 am daily distressed — would not anyone of taste or feeling be distressed at the east end, at once so tawdry and so tarnished; at these huge deep pews, in winch I am sorry, but hardly surprised, that young people >■ unetimes whisper and misbehave ; at the mean windows of the aisles, which I find compared to those of a garret or an almshouse ; at the dingy faded cloth, I know not how many years old ; at these hideous receding galleries, so utterly excluding light and air from the spaces below, that quite naturally none will ever sit there, and room is worse than thrown away which might and would be filled with zealous worshippers ; at the service, of which, owing to the structure, half is performed out of sight of one half of the congregation, and the rest out of sight of the other half, as though with the express object of making worship listless and attention impossible? Can we wonder that the Members of the House of Commons have almost ceased to attend this their own Church, seeing that their pews have been suffered to lapse into a condition unworthy of their occupancy ? Look at the soiled altarcloth, of which the very colour is undiscernible ; at the torn and spotted cushion on which my hand rests, of which it is impossible to tell that the tassels were once of gold. Look, lastly, at any of these mean and corroded gas-standards; and, remembering that in the wilderness it was ordered that the very tongs and 11 snuflferdishes should be of pure gold, ask whether any one of you would for one week tolerate in your own houses the decrepit and mouldering furniture which you tolerate so readily in the House of God ? Let the sad discreditable truth be told, that one of the commonest remarks made to the new Eector who has come among you is, that his Church is too disheartening to attend ; that it is a damp blanket to all effort. Parishioners of St. Margaret's and worshippers in this Church, of which your predecessors and your forefathers were so justly proud, are you content that the commonest observation which I now hear about it should be that it is one of the very dingiest and neglected-looking Churches in all London ? 6. My friends, please God we will not long be liable to this reproach. We can make this Church beautiful and worthy, and we will make it so. For the sake of our Father in Heaven ; for the sake of the Saviour whom we worship ; for the sake of the generation to come ; to put it on the lowest ground of all, for our own sakes — we will do our duty, deny ourselves, and feel before we die that in one good work at least we all have shared. To me, who have come among you but so short a time; coming from a very happy to a very trying life ; coming from a Chapel which I had made radiant with fair colours — the present state of this Church is utterly depressing. If so, what should it be to you ? — to you, for some of whom tin's ( hurch is surrounded by so many hallowed associations; who have here worshipped God for years ; whose » hildren were here baptised ; who stood here at the marriage altar ; who have 12 seen their fathers or their loved ones carried hence to their last Long home? Surely you will do something for it. It is not I who began the work; it was Left you as a sacred legacy by one whom you loved, and £1000 had already been got together by your former Rector. Your new Rector will do his best to get, if you will help him with all your hearts, the £G000 that are still required. I cannot, indeed, like St. Francis of Assissi, encourage you to do the duty by carrying stone and mortar with my own hands ; but I will do what to me is infinitely more dis- agreeable — the begging for funds — in order mainly that God's glory may be promoted, and His work done more heartily and self-denyingly in this parish, and in order too that a succeeding Rector, in coming to a parish where the poor are so many and the workers so few, may not be also and further distressed by the condition of that Holy Place which ought to be for every clergyman his best solace and his most powerful aid. And I ask you, if — as is the case — all sorts of remote villages and obscure fishing- places have raised sums as large as this by the zeal of their parishioners seconding the efforts of their clergy ; if some thousands of Churches have been restored or rebuilt in the last twenty years, are we to fall so utterly behind our brethren in zeal for God's service ? — are we to leave our Church as an utter reproach to us in the very heart of this great city, and under the shadow of the Abbey walls ? .My IV Lei u Is, if any of you do not think that this work is necessary ; if you do not think that God requires it as a sacred duty at our hands ; if any of you love your money 13 better than your duty to the House of God, then to such I have no more to say. We want only cheerful givers, and we do not want the grudging spirit which after all tendeth only to poverty. But if you with me will put your shoulder to the wheel ; if the more generous of you will do as much as I think you ought to do ; if you will enjoy the luxury of a little self-denial for God's service, then by next August the reproach may be rolled away, and the work begun. I will provide easy opportunities by which even the poorest may swell the common fund by contri- buting their mite ; and if others would write upon the paper in the pews the amount which they are ready to subscribe, and either send it to me or put it in the plate with their offertory, it will save much trouble, anxiety, and time. Will you promise me £1000 this morning? You could easily do it. There must — if I be not much mis- taken — there must be at least two hundred people at this moment, in this congregation, who, without any sacrifice worth mentioning, could write down their names on those papers either for £5 or more ; there must be at least two hundred more who could do it for less sums. And if each of you would thus answer an appeal made to you in God's name, you might this very morning, and at this very moment, set a memorable example, and earn a royal blessing. ' Who then is willing to consecrate his service this day unto the Lord ? ' 7. I will add but very little. Some have argued that this Church blocks up the Abbey, and ought to be pulled down. That is, in plain words, nonsense. In the opinions 14 of the best architects and highest authorities, it distinctly and decidedly improves the view of the Abbey by throwing out its grand proportions. My brethren, if you will do your part, I can guarantee that the Church will not be pulled down. In the days when the Lord Protector Somerset tried to pull it down to get materials for his palace, the parishioners rose in a body, tore away his scaffold, drove off his workmen, and — all honour to them for it ! — saved their Church. That was what the parishioners of St. Margaret's did in 1546. What will you do in 1876 ? If indeed you are content — I feel per- fectly confident that you will not be content ; but if you were content — to leave it as dingy, as ugly, as incommo- dious, and as unworthy as it is, then I for one would not lift one finger to save it. On the contrary, I would gladly pull away the first stone, and say, ' Let an inscription be placed here to record — Here once stood the most ancient and famous Parish Church in England; but those who worshipped in it, those whose Parish Church it was, did not care enough for it to make its condition creditable : cut it down ; why cumbereth it the ground ? ' Let me then, my brethren, entreat you all to give in a noble and munificent spirit, I ask you, by all the com- forts and temporal gifts, by all the far higher and greater spiritual blessings, which God has given you ; I ask you, for the sake of that Church of England whose sons you are, whose Sacraments you receive, into whose membership you were baptised ; I ask you, by all sweet and silent com- munion with Christ, by all hallowing influence of prayer, 15 by all those pure and solemn voices of human praise, to give up something for (rod, to show your love and your liberality by the large-hearted readiness with which you come forward to respond to this appeal. And may you so learn, more and more, to raise your thoughts from earth, and earth's treasures, to the incorruptible crowns of Heaven, that when you pass away from the worship of earthly houses, which are but poor and perishing at their brightest and their best, you may, having made to yourselves friends of the mammon of unrighteousness, pass to the golden streets and jasper walls of that New Jerusalem, which, though it burn with the unimaginable splendours of light and love, yet is most unlike earth in this, that it hath no need of any Temple therein ; ( for the Lord Grod Almighty and the Lamb are the Temple of it ' : ( the glory of the Lord doth lighten it, and the Lamb is the light thereof.' TO GEl AOZA. LONDON : PRINTED BY BPOTTISWOOUK AND CO., N I W-STKI T.T SQUARE AND PARLIAMENT STREET i