^ o H\ y § 71 • Q> 3 &tA/ j- • 4 • •• SPECIE PAYM.EN.TS; Friend Jonathan: I perceive, from the newspapers of the day, that your people are calling, some for specie payment, some for increase of currency, and others again for financial changes, vaguely conceived and still more vaguely defined. This being the case, friend Jonathan, it may not be amiss for us to consider the different propositions of these your clamorous people, as well as the reasons of their clamor. You will observe, friend Jonathan, that those demanding a re- turn to specie valuations are generally the Eastern portion of your people, who are, and always have been, the creditor class ; while the demand for more currency comes, very generally, indeed, from the whole balance of your nation. The great Northwest, including the entire South — which, you know, has yet to recover its lost ground in the way of financial prosperity — are to-day well nigh drained of currency. The vast increase, both in population and improvements, of the great West has been, and continues to be, so rapid, that had it started even with the East in the distri- bution of currency, it would not now have anything like a suf- ficiency to represent its increased business capacity. Therefore, friend Jonathan, relief of some kind is looked for by your people, and think you not it should be granted them ? If so, in what shape shall it come ? By a response to the cry of the East and older portion — the mere corner of your country ? To where business pays 5 to 7 per cent, interest for money, as in the East, or where it pays 10 to 20 per cent, as, at the present time, in the West and South? Which shall ic be? Which requires it most, think you? Why is it that business in one section pays less than in the other? Is it not evident that where money is the highest, it is the scarcest, and the demand for it the greatest ? Surely, then, the section where scarcity prevails is the one re- 2 Specie Payments. quiring relief, and, you jjerceive, it must alone be obtained by increasing the commodity you wish to cheapen. A response to the cry of the East, to-wit, specie payment, will only increase the bnrfbet Af Wesjt : causing their business to pay even higher tatfeS «*tft (?*«»©• of money ; chilling and checking their general prosperity ; *.tnJti5iJ^ildfering them unable to pay you their annual tfik, solfmportuiitiy ©A should have/ Whereas ^ proper «r$ljef to the West and South by an increase of capit'al^ jji •the*. ifppd; effi’a sound currency, will be like oiling the machinery of your country. Then activity will be resumed ; en- ergies revived ; farm after farm opened up and improved ; shops, mines and manufactories brought into existence; railroads and their business increased; in fact, the now entire dormant wealth of your great and growing West will be earlier and more fully developed; which, you know, friend Jonathan, should be the case, in order the more fully to assist you in liquidating the pon- derous debt you have upon your shoulders. Recollect, .friend Jonathan, that every farm, shop, mine, railroad, road or other improvement, calculated to increase the production of your country, is aiding you to support your heavy debt; is marching, in the true path toward specie payment, and the ultimate liquida- tion of your debt. It may not be the straight cut; but it is the safe one, and will certainly accomplish the object, that is : Save your people from distress, and enable you to collect your revenue promptly by giving your people the means to pay it. “ But,” you say, “ this will take me further from specie pay- ment.” True, Friend Jonathan, that is true ; for the present it may really do so. But have you not heard the adage, “ The furthest way around is the nearest way home,” and does it not apply in this instance, when we consider the dangers to be avoided and difficulties to be overcome ? Have you never observed a heedless youth take a short cut across a street regard- less of mud and mire, coming out with clothes ruined, when by winding around and varying his course he might have escaped injury ? Then would it not be best for you to pick your steps and vary your path, in order to cross the chasm that lies between you and specie payment ; to avoid the quicksand, and, perhaps, the destruction of your people's prosperity? Not, in varying your course, to suit (as they may think) a mere set of capitalists and financiers. Specie Payments. 3 If then, Friend Jonathan, you are true to your peo.ple; your whole country ; its real, permanent prosperity — not a fictitious prosperity, but such as creates wealth, (the only one worthy your attention) — you will keep your people employed, or so arrange that they employ one another, actively in all branches of industry. This is not only your duty, but it is the grand secret of all national prosperity. “ Oh ! ” you say, “ this is undoubt- edly my duty, but how is to be accomplished ? ” By affording them sufficient currency to work with and represent their labor. This will eventually take you across the chasm with entire safety to your people’s business and your own ; though it may cause the path to wind and lengthen. This, then, is the question : shall your people’s business be cut down to the standard ot' the specie now on hand, or shall the currency be increased to the real business capacity of your country and its people? To you, Friend Jonathan, we look for an answer. No doubt our European neighbors, and their friends in this country — and by these 1 mean those who are now crying specie payment so loudly, and who are using such weighty argu- ments to obtain it — would gladly see you cut down, or even entirely stop, your people’s business by reducing its capacity to your present specie basis, which is not now equal to what it was 30 years ago, when you had but twenty millions inhabitants, and now you have forty millions. This course would so effectually cripple and harass your people’s young business, as to close up the various avenues of industrial pursuits ; giving full swoop to Europe in the markets of your country, and that , Friend Jonathan, is the very thing they, and their friends here, are after, and would be glad to see. Even to restrain the business growth of your country to the present issue of currency is working distress, and must work immensely greater distress in the future. Your country, Friend Jonathan, must not be measured by the matured countries of Europe in the ratio of its currency, or representative capital. The annual production of the older countries leave them, after deducting the general support, a large surplus which enters into, and swells their active business capital ; consequently their ratio of representative capital increases largely over business and popula- tion. This, you must certainly know, is not the case in your 4 Specie Payments. country. Here the reverse is the case ; millions over the pro- duction and consumption go into the opening up of your coun- try, and other improvements, for which there is no representa- tive capital. For example: say the production of your whole country was four thousand millions per annum, and the com- mon consumption three thousand millions ; this would leave, as you would suppose, one thousand millions that would naturally enter the active business capital of your country. This would be the case was your country once properly developed, and its permanent improvements all made, as in the European states ; but instead thereof, your people have expended two thousand millions during the year in improvements ; thus expending one thousand millions over and above their net income in opening up farms, erecting houses, barns and fences, making roads, railroads and machinery — increasing the wealth of your country every year ahead of their income, in permanently adding to its value, but adding nothing to its business capital. You will find this to be the case, friend Jonathan, if you will examine the assess- ments of your states and counties from year to year ; they will show you the figures on this point. Again, friend Jonathan, take the -subject on the basis of popu- lation. Beside the natural increase of your people, they are largely augmented yearly by immigration from every nation of the globe. This immigration being generally comparatively poor, however much it may add to the productive labor, adds nothing to the capital of your country — the medium by which their labor, time, and property is to be computed and adjusted. In England, friend Jonathan, they have 23 to 26 dollars ot rep- resentative capital to each individual of their population. In France it is even greater, being 27 to 30 dollars. When we consider that these countries are small in extent, advanced in improvements, and, if anything, decreasing in population, may we not safely conclude that an equal proportion of capital would not be too much for a country like yours, where everything is yet to be made and done, and whose growth is in its infancy ? But what is the fact? You have barely 15 dollars to the indi- vidual, when you should have more than either of the cases cited ; especially considering the extended boundaries, its rapidly increasing population, unopened condition, and the Specie Payments . 5 amount of work yet to be accomplished. Therefore, 60 dollars per capita is not more than your peo^l^should haye. Besides, a scarcity of currency invariably produces a long credit system — the greatest 3 drawback to -active business that can be imagined. It is hot" possible ’th&t cbutracts can be promptly met with a short currency: 'Onh i^'compe^led to wait on the other, or pay ruinous rates fof^bhey*-^ dftetf failing entirely to obtain it. Every commodity is therefore increased in price ; not only is interest charged on purchases on time, but addi- tional charges are made for risk in collection. Thus it is, that a short currency bears particularly heavy on the poorer classes — which constitutes the largest part of your people — enhancing prices, and rendering the means to pay unobtainable — surely no increase, however large, of currency could equal the evils aris- ing from a short currency, in these particulars. If, therefore, friend Jonathan, you think with me, that there is a necessity for a largely increased issue of currency, the question recurs, to what extent, how, and in what shape shall the issue be made ? To fund a debt as large as yours, friend Jonathan — which yon would be compelled to do, should you attempt specie payment — would but add to the taxes of your already over-burthened people, and largely detract the currency they may have from the legiti- mate channels of business; that is, tie up a large amount in the hands of tax gatherers for no inconsiderable portion of the year ; nor would this plan relieve you to and considerable extent from the harrassing business of providing for interest. Suppose, therefore, friend Jonathan, you fund one-half your debt (as is now proposed) at as low a rate as possible ; that you gradually take up your bonds now held by the national banks and your people, paying for them in currency as you now do to the extent, ultimately, of the remainder of your debt. This amount of cur rency will be none too large ; for it will include the currency now in use; your 3 per cent, certificates ; your 5 and 6 per cent, in- terest bearing notes yet out, and your 5-20 bonds now used by your people in their business for want of currency — and this is very largely done, especially in the South and West. This, with the natural increase of business during the time occupied in grad- ually consummating the plan, will absorb an issue at least equal 6 Specie Payments. to one-half y,ou,r present debt ; every dollar of which will be re- quired, and pt^fi^abfy ttsfeddn tfie business of your people. Of course, I intend that this" i&Siie should be wholly of government paper. * '• < , : * V - ' " i ,