/ 
 
 I 
 
 
 
GROUPS OF SPECIAL GALOIS 
 DOMAINS OF RATIONALITY 
 
 BY 
 
 HARRY ALBERT BENDER 
 A. B. Ohio University, 1918 
 
 THESIS 
 
 Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the 
 
 Degree of 
 
 MASTER OF ARTS 
 IN MATHEMATICS 
 
 IN 
 
 THE GRADUATE SCHOOL 
 
 OF THE 
 
 UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS 
 
 1921 
 

 
 Digitized by the Internet Archive 
 in 2015 
 
 https://archive.org/details/groupsofspecialgOObend 
 
UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS 
 
 THE GRADUATE SCHOOL 
 
 I HEREBY RECOMMEND THAT THE THESIS PREPARED UNDER MY 
 
 BE ACCEPTED AS FULFILLING THIS PART OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR 
 
 THE DEGREE OF 
 
 /3 \CH&f/&L. 
 
 In Charge of Thesis 
 '/ Head of Department 
 
 Recommendation concurred in* * 
 
 Committee 
 
 on 
 
 Final Examination* 
 
 *Required for doctor’s degree but not for master’s 
 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Let f(x)=0 be an irreducible equation of degree n and let 
 
 x,,x^ ,Xj , ,x^ be its roots. Let p* be sin arbitrary rational 
 
 prime and let us suppose that in k(p) 
 
 (l) f (x)=f, (x) .f 2 (x) .fj (x) fs-(x) (p) 
 
 where f c -(x) is of degree n^ ,and irreducible in k(p) . 
 
 In k(p),the domain of the rational p-adic numbers,the 
 number x, cannot satisfy an equation of degree less than n (x, is 
 taken in this sense as any one of the roots of f(x)). For suppose 
 that 
 
 0 ( x ) =a 0 x*'4a ; x** 
 
 is a polynomial of degree less than n.with p-adic coefficients, 
 such that 0( x ; )=0 (p) ,and let 
 
 X/'-a^w, -h a^w.,* + a^w* ( i=1 ,2,3, ,n) . 
 
 We then have 
 
 <P(*f =A, w, -f -+A^w^ 
 
 A i= a fl ^'+ a / + + \. f a /c (i=1 >2,3, ,n) . 
 
 Since an integer of k(x,) is divisible by p when and only when 
 each coefficient in its representation by a fundamental system 
 is a multiple of p,we conclude that <^(x y )=0 (p) when and only 
 
 when A^=0 (p) (i=1,2,3, --,n),and from this system of 
 
 equations it follows that J a t - J.a^=0 (p) . 
 
 But the a ( ^are ordinary rational integers and hence | a iy.'| 
 is a number of k ( 1 ) and since it is not zero there exists a 
 
 *By p without subscripts we shall mean an arbitrary rational 
 prime, and p with subscripts we shall mean the prime divisors 
 
 of p in the algebraic domain. 
 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 . 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
/ 4 yM~ a 4 =,a -4-° (p) - 
 
 Hence ^(x) must vanish Identically , and x, cannot in k(p) satisfy 
 an equation of degree less than n. 
 
 From ( 1 ) we have 
 
 f ( x,) =f,(x,) •f JL (x l ) .f 3 [x,) . fj( Xj) =0 ( p ) 
 
 while no one of the factors is zero. We therefore conclude that 
 in this case B(p,x,) is not a domain. 
 
 Since f(x) is irreducible in the ordinary sense its 
 discriminant cannot vanish and hence it must also be different 
 from zero for the domain of p. Consequently no two of the £ 
 factors can be equal. 
 
 We shall now introduce , corresponding to each of the s 
 factors of f(x) ,s new systems of values for the numbers of R(p,X/) 
 as follows. If/?=B(x / ) is any number of R(p,x / ) and if 
 
 B(x)=Qt(x) .f c - (x) + R< (x) (p), 
 
 we shall call R i(x f ) the value of (3 for the domain of p- cor- 
 responding to the factor f^(x) and shall write /3=Rc (x, ) (p- ) . 
 
 Two numbers f3,- B / (x / ) and/^=B^(x^ ) are said to be equal 
 for the domain p^ when and only when B/(x)-B^(x) is divisible 
 by U (x) . 
 
 We thus have s new rings R(p^ ,x, ) (i= 1 , 2 , 3 * -,s) such 
 
 that each number of R(p,x,) is for the domain of p^- equal to 
 some number of R(jj£ ,x / ) and the sum , difference , and product of 
 two numbers of R(p,x^ ) is for the domain of equal to the sum, 
 difference , and product respectively of the corresponding numbers 
 of R(p^ ,x / ) . Evidently % (x, )=.0 (p^ ) 
 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 . . « £JH 
 
 ■ 
 
 
 
 
 
 
5 
 
 We shall next see that these p -adlc values of the numbere 
 of R(p,Xy) constitute a domain. We need only show that every 
 number/3 ^0 (p^ ) has a uniquely determined reciprocal in R(p x -,x ; ). 
 
 Let us therefore suppose that ft =B(xy ) rjfcO Since/? £0 (p^-) 
 
 it follows that B(x) is not divisible by f/ (x) and hence since 
 fy (x) is irreducible we know that they are relative prime. Hence 
 there are two polynomials \f^(x) and such that 
 
 (p^x) .fy (x) -fl£(x) .B(x) = 1 (p) 
 
 and since rational numbers are equal for the domain of p - ,we 
 can write 
 
 (p/x) .fy (x)-/-(^(x) .B(x) = 1 (py ) 
 
 the coefficients of the polynomials being rational numbers. But 
 
 f/ (x f )=0 (p^ ) 
 
 and hence (x, ) ). Therefore/? has a reciprocal which is 
 
 unique, for if q and /?, are two numbers such that/? ./> -n,A- 1 (p- ) , 
 
 j / y A. 
 
 then /0 / - ^=0 (py ) and hence /?,/?( - /^) -fi, -fy= 0 (Py ) • 
 
 Therefore /? = /? (p.) and the p -adic values of the numbers of 
 R(p,x / ) form a domain which we shall denote by k(py ,x ( ) . 
 
 In k(x^) p is divisible by s distinct prime divisors 
 
 %'/ 'tyx » ,v:here the notation is so chosen that 
 
 xy ) =C^-j. Since in k(p) xy cannot satisfy an equation of degree 
 
 less than n and since t: (x) (j=1,2,3, -,s) are all diBtinct, 
 
 ) (^rj) • But fj (xy ) .f^ (xy ) . -f 5 (x^)=0 (p) and 
 
 hence f, (x^ ) .f^Uy ) -- .f^ (xy )=° (jc-^ ) (i=1,2,— ,n) (j=1»2,-s) 
 
 ( k= 1 , 2 , — , s ) • 
 
 Let us consider the array J constructed with the various 
 distinct prime divisors of p in each of the n domains k(xy) 
 

 
 
 
 
 
 ' 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 . 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
4 
 
 (i=1,2,3» ,n) in which each row contains the distinct prime 
 
 divisors of p in a certain one of the domains. 
 
 p // 
 
 ■P/JL ’ 
 
 p ,J • 
 
 1 
 
 1 
 
 1 
 
 1 
 
 m 
 
 
 L 
 
 ,v xx * 
 
 p « • 
 
 
 ™*P« 
 
 p *, 
 
 
 P *J • 
 
 p yy *" 
 
 * 9 h s 
 
 and associated with this the array of ns numbers from the domains 
 
 fy ( X/ ) > f 2 ( Xy ) , f J ( X/ ) > , f^( X, ) 
 
 f / ( ) > fz ( ^2. ^ ) i » f j- ( ) 
 
 n 
 
 f / ^ ) > f ) j fj ( X^ ; f — t f j- ( X* ) • 
 
 We observe that this arrangement has been so made that any 
 element in II is zero for the domain of the corresponding element 
 of I. 
 
 Let us next suppose that F(V)=0 is the Galoisian resolvent 
 of f(x)=0 for the domain R(l),and that t is any one of its roots, 
 It's degree we shall suppose to be g and when we need to dis- 
 tinguish between the roots we shall denote them by V ; , V 3L ,----,V^. 
 The substitutions on the n roots by which these V's are derived 
 from V / form a transitive group G of order g. The distinct prime 
 
 divisors of p in k(V) we shall denote by P , , ? 3 , , . 
 
 Since k(x, ) is included in k(v) we see that t^s . 
 
 Let us suppose that in k(p) 
 
 F(V)=F, (V) -F a (v) -Fj (V) F* (V) (pj 
 
 where F,; (V) is of degree^'and F^ (V)=0 (P^- ) ( i=1 ,2,3, ,t) • 
 
 And since the factors are all irreducible, they are all distinct 
 and only one of them is zero for the domain of (P^ ) according to 
 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 . 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
5 
 
 the same discussion as in the case of f(x)=f / (x) .f a (x) . .f^ (x)(pj 
 
 Hence each is a root of some F^(v)=0 (P^) and since this 
 equation cannot have more roots than its degree we know that at 
 
 most of the numbers V # , , , are roots of F^(V)=0 
 
 where is the degree of f^(V). Since this is true for all 
 
 (i=1,2, ,g) and for all F^{V) (k=1,2, ,t) and since H ( H---+flpg 
 
 we know that each of the equations F^(v)=0 (P A ) (k=1,2, ,t) 
 
 has in the domain k(P A ,V) exactly roots. 
 
 Let S be a substitution of G which transforms V. into 
 and let us suppose that F^(V, )=0 (P A ). The substitution S then 
 transforms F^CV, ) into ^(V^) and this is again zero for the 
 domain of some P^. If F^V^ )=0 (P^) th en/^=\. In this case we 
 shall say that S transforms the prime divisor P^ into the prime 
 divisor P A ,or the substitution S leaves p* invariant. If however 
 F^(V t )£0 (P^‘ but F^(V^- )=0 (i^J^^^we shall say that S trans- 
 forms the prime divisor P A into the prime divisor 
 
 Hence every substitution of G either leaves P^ invariant 
 or transforms it into another prime divisor of p in k(V) • 
 
 If. we now consider that 
 
 F / (V) -F ^(V) F a (V)=(V-fy )(V-^) (V-.^)(^ ) 
 
 and factorization of a polynomial in a domain is unique we know 
 that 
 
 F; ( V) = ( V- V„ ) ( V-V /JL ) ( V- V /3 ) ( V-V^) ( P A ) 
 
 F A ( V) = ( V- V x , ) ( V-V xx ) ( V- V^) - (V-^) ( P ) 
 
 in * 
 
 E, (V) = { V-V„ ) ( V-T^) (V-V^) (V-\r„) {P* ) . 
 
 The substitutions of G which leave P-, invariant form a 
 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 ' 
 
 • 
 
 • 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
6 
 
 subgroup of G of order say g^ . Let us call this subgroup G / . The 
 substitutions of G / form a group, since G contains all the sub- 
 stitutions which when operated on gives all the other V's,it 
 then contains all the substitutions which when operated on V^y 
 gives all the roots of F^(V) in and by hypothesis all these 
 substitutions are in G / , thus from the theorem in group theory 
 these substitutions of G form a group*. 
 
 Every substitution of G transforms each Vy into some i£j 
 unless the substitution is the identical substitution because 
 each is a primitive number of k(V) and hence under any sub- 
 stitution S goes over into one of its conjugates since k(V) is a 
 galois field or domain. 
 
 Let us suppose that H ; ^H^ (1=1,2, ,t) and 1, S a , , 
 
 are substitutioms such that operating on V ; gives V </( * . Let us 
 
 represent this operation as IV^V,, , , SjV /f =V /Jt , S^V fl =V ; i S . 
 
 Thus there are at least Hy substitutions that leave P^ invariant. 
 Hence the order of Gy is <£Hy . Moreover P^ cannot be left invariant 
 by any other substitution of G because if such were the case then 
 this substitution S transforms V / into and since and S both 
 transform V /y into V,^ and s/s leaves V 7/ invariant. But this is as 
 we have said above, only true when s/s is the identical substitu- 
 tion or when S~.'s= 1 or =S . Hence the order of Gy is H, . 
 
 G contains at least t- 1 substitutions which do not leave 
 invariant , namely the substitutions which carry over into V^y 
 
 (1=1,2,-— ,t) or t x =T£ ( , =V J( , , Then t,G, 
 
 consists of Hy substitutions which do not leave invariant , for 
 
 *Miller ,Blichf eldt ,and Dickson 'Finite Groups' page 286. 
 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 »• 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 . 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 - 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
7 
 
 since Greaves P^ invariant it will give a root of Fj L (V)=0 (P^) 
 when operating on V^and all of these roots are distinct from 
 those of Fy (V) , therefore t^Gy transforms P^ into another prime 
 
 divisor. The same argument holds with t 3 Gy , t G^ , , t r G / . Thus 
 
 G contains at least Hy substitutions that leave P^ invariant , and 
 (t-i)H substitutions that will transform P^ into some other prime 
 divisor. Therefore G contains at least tHy substitutions , that is 
 
 S^tH / . Since g=H,-f H 3 + -fti; and Hyis^H* (i=1,2,3, ,t) we 
 
 see that g^tHy . We therefore conclude that g=tHy and Hy =H 3L =H J( ==-=:H^ 
 
 Hence Fy (V) , F^(V) , F^V), ,F r (V) are all of the same degree, 
 
 and the substitutions of Gy permutes the V^y in TXT with the same 
 first subscript among themselves. 
 
 Since G(V) of degree nj ,and whose roots are derived from 
 the nj valued function of Vy is reducible in k(p) ,and Fy(V) is 
 that irreducible factor in k(p) for which 0 (P^),the sub- 
 stitutions on Xy , x^, Xj , — , x^ by which the roots of 
 
 Fy (V)=0 (P^) are derived from V f is called the group of the 
 given equation in k(p) . 
 
 Since k(Xy ) is included in k(V) 
 
 fy (x) = (x-x // ) (x— x /JL ) (x-x yJ )-- (x-x^)=0 (P^) 
 
 f^ (x) = (x-x J _ / ) (x-x^Kx-Xjj) ( x-x^J) =0 (P^ ) 
 
 fj (x) - (x-x^) (x-Xjj,) (x-x^) (x-Xj^=0 (PA) 
 
 where xj^ ( j=1 ,2,3, ,s) (i=1 ,2,3, ,n^ ) is some one of the 
 
 roots of f ( x ) =0 • The coefficients of f (x)=fy (x) *fj_(x) «r-- .fj (x) 
 
 being symmetric functions of x^ (k=1,2, ,s) (i=1,2, ,n ) 
 
 are unaltered numerically by the substitutions of G, , because Gy 
 
8 
 
 leaves invariant , and hence equals numbers in R. It has been 
 shown that Cr / contains all the substitutions that leave 
 invariant . 
 
 Since the roots of f^ (x)=0 (P^ ) are x </? x^ , x^ , , x^ 
 
 and the roots of f^(x) in k(p) are, say y^ , , , y^, 
 
 and from the simple isomorphism that exists between the roots in 
 k(p) and those in P^ ,we see that the element x-- in the substitu- 
 
 <7 
 
 tions of G, can be replaced by y.-,and we have the group of f(x) 
 in k(p) in terms of the roots of f(x)=0 in k(p) . 
 
 Thus the Theorem: If f(x)=0 is irreducible in R( 1 ) 
 
 and its group in R is G,then in k(p) the group of f(x)=f (x) .fj_(x) 
 fj (x) ‘fj (x) (p) is simple isomorphic to a subgroup G / of G. 
 
 Since this group is simple isomorphic to a subgroup of G, 
 we shall discuss some of the properties of this subgroup instead 
 of the group in k(p) • 
 
 Since f(x) is irreducible in R( 1 ) its group is transitive 
 in the n roots. If f(x) is irreducible in k(p) its group will be 
 transitive also. Thus in this case is G or a transitive sub- 
 group of G. If f ( x ) is reducible in k(p) its group is intran- 
 sitive in the n roots. Since (x) , f^(x), f^ (x) , •, f s (x) 
 
 have no common roots, and are irreducible in k(p) ,the groups of 
 
 f/ (x) , f^(x) , fj(x), ,and fj (x) will not have any common 
 
 element and will be transitive in their roots. G, being the group 
 of f(x)=0 in k(p) it will be composed of these transitive con- 
 stituents . 
 
 If G is a regular group then in k(p) all of the factors of 
 f(x) will be of the same degree , because a subgroup of a regular 
 group will have cycles all of the same degree. 
 
If the group G is not regular, then all of the substitutions 
 do not contain all of the letters, and from a theorem* in group 
 theory, that the order of the sobgroup of a transitive group formed 
 by all of the substitutions which omit a given letter is equal to 
 the order of the group divided by its degree. Hence in this case 
 
 the order of the group of fj (x) , f^(x) , fj(x), ,and f 5 (x) 
 
 separately can not exceed g/n, that is, the order of the transitive 
 constituents can not exceed g/n. Likewise if In k(p) f(x) has 
 one linear factor, this root will not be an element of G ; ,and 
 therefore G, will be of order g/n. If there are several linear 
 factors in k(p) the order of Gj may be less. 
 
 Since Ft (V) (i=1,2,3, ,or t) is irreducible in k(p) , if 
 
 the discriminant of F^(V) is not divisible by p,from the theory 
 of p-adic numbers, we have that the roots of F^(V)=0 mod p are 
 
 4> 3L jb , / a 
 
 M X, - Xi/ > \i . . % • If S V£,=V Xl then s\, =SV^={SV // ) =V/J , 
 
 eto. Thus the group G / is cyclic and thus transitive. Therefore 
 f(x) has all linear factors but one of degree ,and since Q f 
 does not contain all the roots its order is g/n, or a subgroup 
 of this group of order g/n. 
 
 If the group of f(x)=0,f(x) being irreducible in R( 1 ) , is 
 known, then by studying the subgroups of G one can form some idea 
 of the factors of f(x)=0 in k(p),and in many cases determine 
 exactly the form of the factors, as in the case when G is regular. 
 
 By extending this work it may be possible to determine the 
 exact subgroup for certain classes of p and thus determine exact- 
 ly the factors of f(x) in k(p) from the group standpoint of view. 
 
 *Miller ,Blichf eldt ,and Dickson 'Finite Groups’ page 32.