PB89-187652 EPA 530 SW-89 033b 1985 NATIONAL REPORT OF HAZARDOUS WASTE GENERATORS AND TREATMENT, STORAGE AND DISPOSAL FACILITIES REGULATED UNDER RCRA 1 (U.S.) Environmental Protection Agency Washington, DC Mar 89 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE National Technical Information Service NTIS. r date due -- — — — —-- EPA 1985 NATIONAL BIEN • 1 MAL 530 REPORT OF HAZARDOUS SW-89 WASTE GENERATORS AND U33b TREATMENT, STORAGE AND DISPOSAL FACILITIES and disposal - HWRtC LIBRARY United States Environmental Protection Agency EPAy530-SW-89-033B March 1989 VEPA Office of Solid Waste Office of Policy, Planning, and Information Washington, DC 20460 Solid Waste 1985 National Report of Hazardous Waste Generators and Treatment, Storage and Disposal Facilities Regulated Under RCRA Volume II: Methodology and Data REPRODUCED BY U.S. DEPARTMENTOF COMMERCE NATIONAL TECHNICAL INFORMATION SERVICE SPRINGFIELD. VA 22161 , I •?" •• ». > •' I '^T I < ' ~ ^ Sxr jI■. ^ • * - ~ .'4 J ■' . •• " •:• ■ •■ &,;9^irlL,... ..i r - k - ■> V , V‘ ■ j *t,v.--'- 'li^ i if ■ ^iif •■ i^: , V - % t' 'r.rr M ^£d! PREFACE This report was prepared under the direction of the Office of Solid Waste, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) by DPRA Incorporated. The study’s report is divided into two volumes: "1985 National Biermial Report of Hazardous Waste Generators and Treatment, Storage and Disposal Facilities Regulated Under RCRA" (December 1988) Volume I: Summary Volume El: Methodology and Data The Summary report overviews national, regional and limited state-by-state analyses of the generator and facility data that were provided by the states (and territories) in their "State Biennial Program Reports" for 1985 or alternate reporting formats. The Methodology and Data report provides a more detailed assessment of the study’s survey approach and data, particularly state-by-state data profiles and relationships among the states. The computer data base utilized in the study comprises the EPA 1985 Bienitial Report SAS Data Library located at EPA’s National Computing Center, Research Triangle Park, NC. Although each state’s hazardous waste generation and management data are profiled in this report, it focuses on regional and national level analyses. Historically, it has been difficult to obtain uniform and consistent data among ail the states; the "1985 Biennial Report" provides more comprehensive and improved data over earlier 1981 and 1983 studies. Additional needed improvements are recognized and being addressed in EPA’s planning effons. Overall, however, the 1985 Biennial Report is regarded by EPA as a benchmark for future comparative analyses of hazardous waste generation and management data. u -ffc- • I ( XH'j.. Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2019 with funding from University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign Alternates https://archive.org/details/1985nationalbien00unse CONTENTS Page PREFACE u LIST OF TABLES iv UST OF FIGURES vii LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS viii SELECTED DEFINITIONS viii l. INTRODUCTION I-l A. Purpose I-1 B. Generators and TSD Facilities 1-3 C. Hazardous Waste Categories 1-6 D. Report Organization 1-8 n. METHODOLOGY B-l A. Previous Reporting Efforts II-l B. Reponed Data Codes n-2 C. Repotted Data Variations 11-3 D. Data Editing Procedures n-5 m. NATIONAL SUMMARY RESULTS HI-l A. Generators HI-l B. TSD Facilities ni-8 C. Hazardous Waste Generation 10-16 D. Hazardous Waste Disposition 10-19 E. Quantity of Hazardous Waste Managed by Handling Method 10-22 F. Comparison With Other Studies 10-40 G. Quality Assurance Procedures 10-41 rV. STATE AND TERRITORY SUMMARY PROFILES IV-1 A. State-by-State Comparisons FV-l B. State and Territory Summary Profiles rV-4 REFERENCES APPENDIX A. 1985 STATE BIENNIAL REPORT DATA COMPARISONS APPENDIX B. U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY HAZARDOUS WASTE REPORT FORMS FOR 1985 APPENDIX C. STATE BIENNIAL PROGRAM REPORT FOR 1985 I LIST OF TABLES Page Table IH-l. Number of Large Hazardous Waste Generators and Total Hazardous Waste Quantity Generated by EPA Region, 1985 111-2 Table 111-2. Number of Large Hazardous Waste Generators and Total Hazardous Waste Quantity Generated by State, 1985 III-4 Table 111-3. Leading Hazardous Waste Generating States and Their Hazardous Waste Quantities Generated, 1985 III-5 Table 111-4. Number of Hazardous Waste Treatment, Storage and Disposal (TSD) Facilities and Quantity of Hazardous Waste Managed by EPA Region, 1985 HI-10 Table III-5. Number of Hazardous Waste Treatment, Storage and Disposal (TSD) Facilities and (^antity of Hazardous Waste Managed by State, 1985 111-13 Table 111-6. Number of Hazardous Waste Treatment, Storage, and Disposal Facilities Reporting the Use of Each Handling Method by Region, 1985 111-15 Table IQ-?. Rank-Ordered Listing of the Largest 25 U.S. Hazardous Waste Streams Generated in 1985 111-18 Table 111-8. Hazardous Waste Shipped Out-of-State and Reported Destination of Shipments by State, 1985 111-21 Table in-9. Quantity of Hazardous Waste Treated, Stored and Dispos^ by Handling Method and by Region, 1985 111-23 Table lU-lO. Quantities of Hazardous Waste Managed Using the Container Storage (SOI) Handling Method by Waste Group, 1985 111-24 Table Hl-ll. Quantities of Hazardous Waste Managed Using the Tank Storage (S02) Handling Method by Waste Group, 1985 in-25 IV LIST OF TABLES (Continued) Table 01-12. Table 10-13. Table 10-14. Table 01-15. Table 01-16. Table 01-17. Table 01-18. Table 01-19. Table 01-20. Table 01-21. Table 01-22. Quantities of Hazardous Waste Managed Using the Waste Pile Storage (S03) Handling Method by Waste Group, 1985 Quantities of Hazardous Waste Managed Using the Surface Impoundment Storage (S04) Handling Method by Waste Group, 1985 Quantities of Hazardous Waste Managed Using the Other Storage (S05) Handling Method by Waste Group, 1985 Quantities of Hazardous Waste Managed Using the Tank Treatment (TOl) Handling Method by Waste Group, 1985 Quantities of Hazardous Waste Managed Using the Surface Impoundment Treatment (T02) Handling Method by Waste Group, 1985 Quantities of Hazardous Waste Managed Using the Incinerator Treatment (T03) Handling Method by Waste Group, 1985 Quantities of Hazardous Waste Managed Using the Other Treatments (T04) Handling Method by Waste Group, 1985 Quantities of Hazardous Waste Managed Using the Injection Well Disposal (D79) Handling Method by Waste Group, 1985 Quantities of Hazardous Waste Managed Using the Landfill Disposal (D80) Handling Method by Waste Group, 1985 Quantities of Hazardous Waste Managed Using the Land Treatment Disposal (D81) Handling Method by Waste Group, 1985 Quantities of Hazardous Waste Managed Using the Surface Impoundment Disposal (D83) Handling Method by Waste Group, 1985 P.agg m -26 in-27 m -28 in-29 in-30 m-31 m-32 in-33 in-34 in-35 in-36 LIST OF TABLES (Continued) Table 111-23. Quantities of Hazardous Waste Managed Using the Other Disposals (D84) Handling Method by Waste Group, 1985 Table in-24. Quantities of Hazardous Waste Managed Using the Recycle (ROl) Handling Method by Waste Group, 1985 Table 111-25. Quantities of Hazardous Waste Managed Using All Handling Methods by Waste Group, 1985 Table FV-l. Rank Ordering of States Based on the Quantity of RCRA-Regulated Hazardous Waste Generated and the Corresponding Number of RCRA and State- Regulated Generators in 1985 Table rV-2. Rank Ordering of States Based on the (Quantity of RCRA-Regulated Hazardous Waste Managed and the Corresponding Number of RCRA and State- Regulated TSD Facilities in 1985 Page in-37 in-38 in-39 IV-2 IV-3 VI LIST OF FIGURES Page Figure I-l. U.S. EPA Regions and Region-State Designations 1-2 Figure 1-2. Biennial Reporting Requirements for Generators of Hazardous Waste 1-4 Figure 1-3. Biennial Reporting Requirements for Treatment, Storage and Disposal Facilities Which Manage RCRA- Regulated Hazardous Waste 1-5 Figure EI-l. Schematic of the 1985 Biennial Report Data System 11-8 Figure 11-2. Structure Chart for the 1985 National Biennial Report SAS Data Library EH-10 Figure III-l. Amount of Hazardous Waste Generated by EPA Region, 1985 111-6 Figure in-2. Hazardous Waste Generated in the U.S. By State, 1985 m-7 Figure in-3. Cumulative Percentage of Hazardous Waste Generated in the U.S., 1985 10-9 Figure 111-4. Amount of Hazardous Waste Managed by EPA Region, 1985 EQ-12 Figure in-5. Hazardous Waste Managed in the U.S. by State, 1985 ni-14 Figure in-6. Relative Amount of Hazardous Waste Managed in Onsite and Offsite Facilities, 1985 111-17 Figure EEI-7. Leading Hazardous Wastes in the U.S. by EPA Waste Code, 1985 m-20 Figure in-8. Overview of Data Concerns With the 1985 Biennial Report in-43 Figure 0-9. Illustration of the Mass Balance Concept for Hazardous Waste 0-44 Figure EV-l. Illustration of 1985 Biennial Report State Profile Tables rV-5 vii LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS BR CFR CMA DL biennial report Code of Federal Regulations Chemical Manufacturers Association data library EP EPA GAO HSWA extraction procedure (EP toxic waste) Environmental Protection Agency General Accounting Office Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (of 1984) HW HWDMS LQG NCC hazardous waste hazardous waste data management system large quantity generator National Computing Center (EPA’s North Carolina facility at Research Triangle Park) OSW OTA QA/QC RCRA Office of Solid Waste Office of Technology Assessment quality assurance/quality control Resource Conservation and Recovery Act SAS SIC SQG TSD TSDR Statistical Analysis System Standard Indusffial Qassification small quantity generator treatment, storage, and disposal treatment, storage, disposal, and recycle SELECTED DEFINITIONS Reyulated Waste Includes hazardous wastes regulated under Federal and state stamtes by large quantity Generated : generators and some small quantity generators (SQGs) where states regulate SQGs RC31A Regulated Includes RCRA listed and characteristic wastes, exclusive of state regulated hazardous Waste Generated : waste Reyiilated Wa.ste Includes hazardous wastes managed by all RCRA and state-regulated TSD facilities. Managed : RCRA Rggilatcd W aste Managed: Includes RCRA listed and characteristic wastes managed at on-site and off-site facilities. Wastes management units included: • Storage (SOI to S04) - Containers - Tanks - Waste Piles - Surface Impoundments • Treatment (TOl to T04) - Tanks - Surface Impoundments - Incinerators - Other • Disposal (D79 to D84) - Injection Wells - Landfills - Land Treatment - 0:ean - SurffK:e Impoundments - Oher • Recycling (ROl) vm 1985 NATIONAL BIENNIAL REPORT OF HAZARDOUS WASTE GENERATORS AND TREATMENT, STORAGE AND DISPOSAL FACILITIES REGULATED UNDER RCRA VOLUME II: METHODOLOGY AND DATA I. INTRODUCTION This Volume II report surmarizes the data gathered by the Environmental Protection Agency for the 1985 biennial report on RCRA-regulated hazardous waste generation and management activities. This introductory chapter briefly describes the purpose of the study, the generators of hazardous waste, the facilities that manage these wastes, and the hazardous waste streams and handling methods utilized by facilities. A. Purpose Effective management of the nation's hazardous wastes requires that Congress, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, and state environmental offices have and maintain responsible and accurate information regarding the generation, handling, storage, and ultimate disposal of those wastes. Providing that information is the function of this 1985 biennial report on the U.S. RCRA-regulated hazardous waste system. The study reports such data for each of the fifty states and three territories which comprise ERA'S ten regions in Figure I-l. Previous studies have proved insufficient for such a purpose (see Section II.A) and though the present study has weaknesses, the information assembled does provide EPA with a profile of the RCRA-regulated hazardous waste community. The data offer the most comprehensive national summary view yet of (1) the number of RCRA-regulated hazardous waste generators and the kinds and quantities of their generated wastes and (2) the number of treatment, storage, and disposal (TSD) facilities and the kinds and quantities of wastes they manage. I-l FIGURE I-l. U.S. ERA REGIONS AND REGION-STATE DESIGNATIONS Region-State Designations 4 Alabama 10 Alaska 9 Arizona 6 Arkansas 9 California 8 Colorado 1 Connecticut 3 Delaware 3 District of Columbia 4 Florida 4 Georgia 9 Hawaii 10 Idaho 5 niinois 5 Indiana 7 Iowa 7 Kansas 4 Kentucky 6 Louisiana 1 Maine 3 Maryland 1 Mas^husetts 5 Michigan 5 Minnooca 4 Mississippi 6 Missoun 8 Montana 7 Nebraska 9 Nevada 1 New Hampshire 2 New Jersey 6 New Mexico 2 New York 4 North Carolina 8 North Dakota 5 Ohio 6 Oklahoma 10 Oregon 3 Pennsylvania 1 Rhode Island 4 South Carolina 8 South Dakota 4 Tennessee 6 Texas 8 Utah 1 Vermont 3 Virginia 10 Washington 3 West Virginia 5 Wisconsin 8 Wyoming 9 American Samoa 9 Guam 2 Puerto Rico 2 Virgin Islands Source: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 1-2 B. Generators and TSD Facilities Under the procedures developed for this study, RCRA-regulated hazardous waste generators and TSD facilities completed and submitted data forms to state and ERA offices describing their waste management practices. The data from these forms were entered into specific State Summary formats and forwarded to ERA for processing and incorporation into the present study. However, an understanding of this study's data involves an awareness both of those facilities that were required to report and of those that were exempt. Figures 1-2 and 1-3 show in detail those factors that characterized the reporting facilities and by implication the rationale for including them (or exempting them) in this biennial report. However, a less detailed narrative explanation follows that outlines the generators and TSD facilities affected. The management of hazardous wastes varies among the states. ERA administers the uniform RCRA program in states not authorized to conduct an ERA-approved regulatory program; authorized states conduct their own RCRA-required program. In some cases, their regulatory requirements are different and more stringent than the Federal government's, a condition that results in those states controlling a broader range of wastes, generators, and TSD facilities than would be the case if ERA administered the program. This study required that sites (i.e., generators and TSD facilities) subject to both federal and state administered requirements file waste system reports that would reflect their 1985 activities. Sites that were classified as generators within the Hazardous Waste Data Management System (HWDMS) were required to file Form 8700-13A, "U.S. Environmental Rrotection Agency Hazardous Waste Generator Report for 1985" (see Appendix B) or an approved alternate form that involves 1985 waste generation activities. Those facilities which treated, stored, or disposed of RCRA-regulated hazardous wastes during any part of 1985 filed Form 8700-13B, "U.S. Environmental Rrotection Agency Hazardous Waste Treatment, 1-3 FIGURE 1-2. BIENNIAL REPORTING REQUIREMENTS FOR GENERATORS OF HAZARDOUS WASTE "^/oe of 3usmess/Activity Required Sufcttnssions "d this sue suomit a Notii'ication of Hazardous Waste ctivifies Form (ERA Form 3700-12) and indicate large uantity generator status? 'ies :i Id ttie ousiness generate any quantity of RCRA naracteristic or listed hazardous wastes during 985? ■^es ere all wastes generated during 1985 exemoted from the CRA '-egulations, because they eUher were not solid astes as defined in 40 CFR 261.2, not hazardous waste s defined in 40 CFR 261,3, delisted onor to January !,■ ?85. or were excluded under 40 CFR 261.4 or 40 CFR 52.51? No i Id the business generate during any calendar month, r accumulate at any time, a total of at least; L) 1,C00 kilograms of hazardous waste; or 2) one xilogram of acute hazardous wastes listed in 40 CFR 261.31, 261.32 or 261.33(e); or 3) 100 kilograms of any residue or contaminated soil, of a soill, into or on any land or water, of any acute hazardous wastes listed in 40 CFR 261,31, 261.32 or 261.33(e)? ■'es ?'•? all wastes generated during 1985 exemoted from egulations because the material will be beneficially sed, reused, recycled or reclaimed? No i. Id the business store for less than 90 cays and ship '■^-site all of the hazardous wastes it generated unng I95Fwi thout treatment or disposal? No X Id this sue use only treatment, storage, and isoosal techniques which are exempt from the RCRA egulations? No Assumed not reouireq to suomi Biennial Report. NO No 'es No The business did not generate regulated quantities of Hazardous waste during 1985, but must still suomit page one of the Generator Biennial Hazardous Waste Report (ERA Form 8700-13A or the authorized state equivalent) m order to certify Non-Regulated Status under one of the following status codes: 9 -- Out of Business 1 -- Non-Handler 4 -- Exempt 2 -- Small Quantity Generator 5 — Beneficial Jse 'es The business generated regulated quantities of hazardous waste during 1985, and must submit a completed Generator Biennial Hazardous Waste Report (ERA Form 3700-13A or the equivalent State developed form in an autnonred State). ^es l£l The business treated, stored or disposed of hazardous waste during 1985, and must submit a completed Facility (TSD) Biennial Hazardous Waste Report (ERA Form 3700-13B or the equivalent State developed form in an authorized State) and a Generator Biennial Hazardous waste Report (ERA Form 3700-13A or the equivalent State developed form in an authorized State). 1-4 FIGURE 1-3. BIENNIAL REPORTING REQUIREMENTS FOR TREATMENT, STORAGE AND DISPOSAL FACILITIES WHICH MANAGE RCRA-REGULATED HAZARDOUS WASTE *yoe of Business Facility Pequirgd Submissions 1-5 storage and Disposal Facility Report for 1985" (see Appendix B) or an approved alternate form in order to report those activities. To assure the completeness of data, facilities whose activities were characteristic of both generators and TSDs filed both reports. Sites of either type or a combination of both types, who filed state-EPA designed reports, had the data on their RCRA-regulated hazardous waste activities summarized for this report. In essence, then, and as Figures 1-2 and 1-3 show, the data designed for the study reflect a comprehensive view of nearly all activities dealing with the generation and treatment of RCRA-regulated hazardous wastes in the United States. Data filing requirements were comprehensive. For example, sites that were listed within the HWDMS but that had ceased operations reported that status (as well as any minimal activities they may have carried out in 1985). Facilities operating under interim status RCRA standards indicated their practices, also. An exception to the reporting requirements was the "small quantity generator" which was defined in 1985 as a generator accounting for no more than 1,000 kilograms per month (or 13.2 tons per year) of hazardous waste over the entire survey year. These generators were given a non-regulated status (see Figure 1-2 for a full description of this exception.) Many such generators exist, but their cumulative hazardous waste contribution to the national aggregate is relatively minor. C. Hazardous Waste Categories The reporting procedures for the Biennial Report required that generators and TSD facilities provide data on those wastes that are defined as hazardous by 40 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 261.3, i.e. primarily those wastes that either exhibit a characteristic of a hazardous waste as defined in Parts 261.20 through 261.24 or are listed in Parts 261.31 through 261.33. Specific wastes which were not included are: (1) those generated by "small quantity generators" as defined in 40 CFR 261.5; (2) 1-6 excluded under 40 CFR Part 261.4 or under the beneficial use exemption of Part 261.6; (3) delisted prior to January 1, 1985; (4) deemed hazardous only by state regulations (e.g., PCBs, asbestos, waste oil); (5) exempted under Part 261.51; or (6) not meeting the definitions of a solid or hazardous waste (Parts 261.2 and 261.3, respectively). The specific hazardous wastes included in the CFR regulations are numerous -- too numerous to allow a manageable, accurate census report from as many generators and ISO facilities and as many administrative agencies as were covered by this report. In order to make reporting a manageable task and to lessen reporting and summarizing inaccuracies, the reportable waste types and quantities were grouped as follows: 0 D001--Ignitable waste, 0 D002--Corrosive waste, 0 D003--Reactive waste, 0 D004-D017--E. P. Toxic wastes, 0 F001-F005—Spent halogenated and non-halogenated solvents from non-specific sources, 0 F006-F028--Electroplating and coating wastewater treatment sludges and cyanide-bearing bath solutions and sludges from non-specific sources, 0 K001-K106—Listed industry wastes from specific sources, 0 P001-P123--Acutely hazardous commercial chemical products, manufacturing chemical intermediates, or off-specification commercial chemical products or manufacturing chemical intermediates, and 1-7 0 U001-U249--Toxic commercial chemical products, manufacturing intermediates or off-specification commercial chemical products or manufacturing intermediates. Generators and TSD facilities that handled wastes in multiple categories were to use waste mixture codes to report their data as follows: 0 DOMX--Mixtures of all "D" wastes, 0 FOMX--Mixtures of all "F" wastes, 0 KOMX--Mixtures of all "K" wastes, 0 • POMX--Mixtures of all "P" wastes, 0 UOMX--Mixtures of all "U," and 0 MOMX--Mixtures of multiple waste types (e.g., mixtures of "D" and "F" wastes, "P" and "K" wastes, RCRA-regulated and solely state-regulated wastes, multiple state-regulated wastes, etc.). The 1984 Congressional stipulations for the biennial reporting of hazardous waste generation and management activities also required generators to report on their efforts to minimize the volume and toxicity of their generated wastes. The changes achieved through these efforts were to be compared with the performance of previous years. However, those compilations are not included in this EPA report. D. Report Organization Chapters II through IV comprise the remainder of this Volume II Report. Chapter II describes the study's methodology. Chapter III presents a series of national aggregate summary tables and a brief analysis of each. Chapter IV contains the individual states and territories' 1985 biennial report profile data (3 pages per state). Chapter IV also includes comparative summaries of selected generator and TSD facility data for all states. Following Chapter IV, Appendix A summarizes key hazardous waste generator and TSD facility data from the 1985 Biennial Report survey forms. 1-8 Appendix B contains examples of the generator and TSD facility forms used to gather the study's primary data. Appendix C contains EPA's "State Biennial Program Report" for the 1985 biennial report. K ! 'SO wo^tvfts tft *>u»:'‘p!® catswir^^-ii *ier< w:t >j5:e nutur; Cv ^ Mtjrtvra? of ill ^v' ws t*#! 0 PnMl.-Hixtt.r«J of an *‘P ^istis, 0 Oi>*X—KiAt«r#i af »1i "U,”'n«< * '■ 0 *}» Hhil t^pU wi t;,y‘i -j., tn!*tij>4i;. ^0*' A'vd “?'* Ki', n- <^Ct< tfiquUt^a 4 U4te-r€?'jUud Twitlpl^ tuU*r«^U^o t The 19S4 tA* bt^^n-nl^l c? fetr diT« 5:tiv' »t iHo i^r.r-rntofi to ,’-£|.'>r‘ ^ 'hfiif efforts tc Wtniniuif :<■> . .v»jk inif tojcinty of ?:f>e1t ^ 9t»>«r§f/« wi-*..#t, ’^Ue ch^ »9e$ itf f*rij tpre-^ efforts nte»**o»r7»jfrn't f i>re r ’ju< ye-irt. thflv* cc?rj;lte-i♦ ons ^.re net 'nciud^'-i ' *' *■ i^'^Hreper?. _ ■ ;• ^*4 0 . ^ *Jort * 3 r 4111 * 111 ) o n % I (I '•Vircoph If ccri>cri5€ tN ''cWiMJer of thtS' !! vfcort* 'oiptjr “ 4 isc lOei th# steady^-etnodolo^y. CMOter ni a ^irt^s fli’ ne-iandl »oi r*fy^ »bfc,i> ^^ * ' S'Mmvamw -v-w —-• ,;ftoq^ii »^n?lb?8 fc»fJ n'¥^0S^JnBvz ’ ^tortf* 7a >'M?L.*'ilitC-4«- j»«JLl^*Jt3ri>t *' - » t '7 tvft'.i xr.tH V‘ ■' *2g*5£« ■»♦**»« '0 .'"'I'lnuisa tie IfK?^ ^:^uo^s b«xt?»rt&io tet^ wTT^pfq jfi plf^ uotgyi^ n/fa bwoqotq oJ b^tioJ’zuboa s^aod^i oS^ etoo ff! hf fsK n9t9 9fiJ ’to nctirov wtl rtf t^noJtf^noa lUpS^Ti/f frftofn-i %0 2s;s.t^, % •fOrtiOOfc ftow 1 « # • * t ^ i-ij td ♦ott I^nvtMX fou 70IWK9 nf . L. ■•■ ■* iilf’ S^JUrCtl 1-t.^v f* 4 iCii -voti t’fuR ^c^rr.y br WMU. ^ m ';*i« IV. STATE AND TERRITORY SUMMARY PROFILES This chapter first presents selected state data comparisons for both hazardous waste generation and management. The comparisons highlight the top-ranked states for the chosen variables. Second, the chapter contains a separate summary profile of hazardous waste generation and management for each state and territory. The summary profile consists of a three-page summary of data submitted by the state for the 1985 Biennial Report. (Although the state data have been edited and revised in some cases, data inconsistencies remain for some states. Apparent data discrepancies could not be feasibly resolved within the study's scope. Rather, improved plans for conducting subsequent Biennial Reports have been established.) A. State-by-$tate Comparisons Table IV-1 lists all states and territories in their rank order of the total quantity of hazardous waste generated in 1985. The quantities shown are predominantly RCRA-regulated hazardous wastes, but 1 percent or less of state-only regulated wastes are included in the national total. 1/ Also reported in Table IV-1 is the number of generators reported by each state in 1985. As can be seen, the rank ordering of the states according to the number of generators is not equal to the rank-ordering according to the quantities shown. However, there is a strong correlation as expected. Table IV-2 presents a rank-ordering of all states according to the quantity of hazardous waste managed in 1985. This listing is similar to the state y The larger of Survey Section I or III data is reported (see Appendix A). Section I includes both RCRA and state-only regulated hazardous wastes if applicable. Only the following states have over one percent state-only regulated wastes: MA, WA, VT, ME, MN, MO, RI, and CA. IV-1 TABLE IV-1 RANK ORDERING OF STATES BASED ON THE QUANTITY OF RCRA-REGULATED HAZARDOUS WASTE GENERATED and THE'CORRESPONDING NUMBER OF RCRA AND STATE-REGULATED GENERATORS IN 1985 1985 RCRA- requlated hazardous waste 1/ RCRA regulated and State- generators 2/ Rank State Quantity F*ercent Numoer Percent (000 tons) 1 Texas 38,767.6 14.30 2,450 11.27 2 Georgia 37.324.8 13.77 330 1.52 3 Tennessee 33,199.0 12.25 556 2.56 4 Pennsylvania 31,307.2 11.55 2,607 11.99 5 Virginia 24,995.5 9.22 532 2.45 6 New York 15.969.2 5.89 652 3.00 7 Louisiana 13.672.1 5.04 302 1.39 8 West Virginia 12.077.1 4.46 57 0.26 9 California 9.657.8 3.56 3,972 18.27 10 New Jersey 8,999.5 3.32 1,480 6.81 11 Kentucky 7.661.9 2.83 187 0.86 12 Alabama 7,406.2 2.73 217 1.00 13 South Carolina 5,300.8 1.96 171 0.79 14 Michigan 4,076.9 1.50 542 2.49 15 Ohio 2,986.3 1.10 688 3.16 16 Indiana 2,517.9 0.93 395 1.82 17 Mississippi 2,507.5 0.93 109 0.50 18 Illinois 2,141.4 0.79 760 3.50 19 Oklahoma 1,591.2 0.59 118 0.54 20 Kansas 1,324.7 0.49 131 0.60 21 North Carolina 1,285.3 0.47 384 1.77 22 Utah 1,134.8 0.42 220 1.01 23 Arizona 846.7 0.31 160 0.74 24 Florida 833.7 0.31 273 1.26 25 Maryland 698.3 0.26 206 0.95 26 Nebraska 543.4 0.20 65 0.30 27 Washington 439.2 0.16 188 0.86 28 Minnesota 328.6 0.12 291 1.34 29 Colorado 295.0 0.11 90 0.41 30 Connecticut 178.0 0.07 376 1.73 31 Puerto Rico 149.0 0.05 115 0.53 32 Wisconsin 123.4 0.05 240 1.10 33 Iowa 120.8 0.04 123 0.57 34 Massachusetts 114.4 0.04 1,013 4.66 35 Nevada 94.8 0.03 34 0.16 36 Delaware 94.5 0.03 25 0.11 37 Missouri 68.1 0.03 191 0.88 38 Arkansas 57.2 0.02 114 0.52 39 Oregon 30.8 0.01 505 2.32 40 Montana 25.2 0.01 17 0.08 41 New Hampshire 19.9 0.01 102 0.47 42 Wyoming 19.8 0.01 •14 0.06 43 Rhode Island 11.6 0.00 3/ 403 1.85 44 Vermont 9.8 0.00 " 124 0.57 45 New Mexico 8.8 0.00 56 0.26 46 HmII 7.3 0.00 26 0.12 47 MtffW 7.1 0.00 69 0.32 48 PiDrtfi Dakota 3.2 0.00 8 0.04 49 Alaska 2.6 0.00 9 0.04 50 Idaho 2.0 0.00 24 0.11 51 District of Columbia 1.9 0.00 6 0.03 52 South Dakota 0.9 0.00 9 0.04 53 Guam 0.4 0.00 4 0.02 TOTAL* 271,037.3 100.00 21,740 100.00 * Hay not add due to rounding. y Some states exempt hazardous wastewater following treatment from further regulation (if nonhazardous) while other states do not exempt such wastewater. Consequently, the rank ordering of states could vary if the exemption procedure were constant. 2/ Number of large quantity generators, i.e., over 13.2 tons annually, plus generators with unreported quantities (zeros or blanks). See Appendix A. 3/ 0.00 indicates less then 0.01. Source: Prepared by DPRA from the 1985 Biennial Report SAS Data Library. (Survey Sections I and III data. 0L88350) IV-2 TABLE IV-2 RANK ORDERING OF STATES BASED ON THE QUANTITY OF RCRA-RE6ULATED HAZARDOUS HASTE MANAGED AND THE CORRESPONDING HUMBER OF RCRA AND STATE-REGULATED TSD FACILITIES IN 1985 1985 RCRA- regulated hazardous waste 1/ RCRA and regulated TSD State- fad 1 1 ties Rank State Quantity Percent Number Percent (000 tons) 1 Texas 41,426.2 17.42 1,153 23.32 2 Georgia 37,318.5 15.69 91 1.84 3 Pennsylvania 31,179.3 14.11 464 9.39 4 Virginia 24,970.7 10.50 67 1.36 5 Louisiana 14,699.8 6.18 67 1.36 6 West Virginia 12,044.9 5.06 39 0.79 7 New York 10,219.6 4.30 132 2.67 8 New Jersey 8,985.9 3.78 284 5.75 9 Kentucky 8,245.8 3.47 44 0.89 10 Alabama 7,593.0 3.19 66 1.33 11 Michigan 5,536.7 2.33 126 2.55 12 South Carolina 5,292.7 2.22 83 1.68 13 Utah 4,777.7 2.01 39 0.79 14 Ohio 3,851.8 1.62 251 5.08 15 California 3,734.3 1.57 348 7.04 16 Mississippi 2,449.3 1.03 47 0.95 17 Illinois 2,355.6 0.99 295 5.97 18 Oklahoma 2,171.9 0.91 46 0.93 19 Indiana 1,873.4 0.79 133 2.69 20 North Carolina 1,416.3 0.60 78 1.58 21 Kansas 1,324.6 0.56 35 0.71 22 Arizona 920.0 0.39 98 1.98 23 Tennessee 915.5 0.38 50 1.01 24 Arkansas 724.3 0.30 35 0.71 25 Florida 723.3 0.30 72 1.46 26 Washington 642.9 0.27 60 1.21 27 Maryland 601.9 0.25 44 0.89 28 Massachusetts 541.8 0.23 52 1.05 29 Colorado 279.9 0.12 34 0.69 30 Connecticut 174.2 0.07 138 2.79 31 Puerto Rico 129.7 0.05 54 1.09 32 Wisconsin 105.4 0.04 70 1.42 33 Nevada 96.9 0.04 8 0.16 34 Iowa 94.9 0.04 46 0.93 35 Minnesota 94.9 0.04 41 0.83 36 North Dakota 84.7 0.04 7 0.14 37 Rhode Island 67.4 0.03 13 0.26 38 Wyoming 66.0 0.03 11 0.22 39 Missouri 34.1 0.01 96 1.94 40 Oregon 28.6 0.01 13 0.26 41 Delaware 27.3 0.01 15 0.30 42 Montana 24.8 0.01 9 0.18 43 New Mexico 7.4 0.0 2/ 16 0.32 44 Hawaii 6.2 0.00 " 12 0.24 45 Nebraska 5.0 0.00 8 0.16 46 Idaho 4.3 0.00 11 0.22 47 Naino 2.6 0.00 17 0.34 48 Alaska 1.3 0.00 5 0.10 49 Varaont 0.8 0.00 7 0.14 50 New Hampshire 0.7 0.00 9 0.18 51 Guam 0.3 0.00 2 0.04 52 South Dakota 0.0 0.00 2 0.04 53 District of Columbia 0.0 0.00 1 0.02 TOTAL* 237,875.3 100.00 4,944 100.00 * May not add due to rounding. y Some states exempt hazardous wastewater following treatment from further regulation (if nonhazardous) “ while other states do not exempt such wastewater. Consequently, the rank ordering of states could vary if the exemption procedure were constant. 2/ 0.0 indicates less than 1,000 tons; 0.00 indicates less than 0.01. Source: Prepared by OPRA from the 1985 Biennial Report SAS Data Library. (Survey Sections II and VI data. 0L88350) IV-3 rankings for generation with the main higher-ranked management states being New York and Illinois. Overall, there is a high correlation in the ranking of states by generation and management, largely because most industrial wastes are managed by onsite ISO facilities. Thus, most states manage approximately the same quantities as they generate. B. State and Territory Sumnary Profiles Each state profile consists of a three-page summary as illustrated in Figure IV-1. The contents of each page are outlined briefly here and the profiles follow for each state in alphabetical order. 1. Generator, TSD and Handling Method Data Each state's biennial report profile first contains the following summary data for generators and TSD facilities in the state: 0 Total number of RCRA regulated large quantity generators 0 Total quantity of regulated (RCRA and State) waste generated 0 Total number of RCRA regulated TSD facilities number managing only onsite generated waste number managing only offsite generated waste number managing waste generated both onsite and offsite 0 Total quantity of RCRA regulated waste managed 0 Disposition of waste (onsite and offsite) by handling method The figures for the total number of RCRA and state-regulated generators were obtained from the list of generators attached to each state's Biennial Program Report as required by the instructions in Section I of that report. The total quantity of regulated waste generated was obtained from either Section I or Section III of the 1985 State Biennial Program Report (Appendix C) -- whichever is larger. The rationale for this approach is that missing data exist in Sections I and III, but not in both. By IV-4 ■ FIGURE IV-1. ILLUSTRATION OF 1985 BIENNIAL REPORT STATE PROFILE TABLES !«•) SliHMUl. IIRMT sr4rf RlO^Uf F3I THi STATi OF <4iHMCrO« IT*tLf J OF II MASTf sTt|4M sr«rf •4«ii«c commio to matiomi. (awim iroF fifiti ••ATI0M4C tAM FASTI COOf ouAMfirf odcftarco IN srari itonsi STArc AAsri COOf tANA fItCfNT Of srAfi total 1 0002 AT.AOI 1 10.01 1 Nona OltOOl 2 lA.lT 1 ooai IAO.919 1 AInOO A SOOT *10 10 0.11 5 com l.S«l il OnAI 4 ^001 SOI 10 O.Of 7 OOOl ISA 11 0.01 i«s> iiiMiAL AfFoar sTArt FioFitt Fot nia stati of masni«ct(h IIAOLi i OF II total auAvTITT OF MATAUOUS FAtTf (IFOOTIO SNIFFCO OUT OF JTAII If IF DOTS 11 total OUAMTITT of iMlAttOm hasti AIFO tTIO TMIFFfO FfOn OTNfO STATU • lAFOOTSII 1/ MCI IT Iff STATI AMAMAS AOIIORA CALIFOMIA colooaoo Toas SMIFFfO A* AA A.UI I STATU SalFFiaC TO aASMiacTOa ALAtIA CALIFOMIA COLOOAOO aAfAlt TOM SNIFFfO t«f« tIiaalAL IIFOOT stati FfOFILf FOf THf STATI OF MASNIOCTOO ITAOLf 1 OF II TOTAL aUMOia OF fCfA UtULATIO LAACi SINIfATOIS ISICTION fCOA flfULATIO TSO FACILITIU ISICTION III FACILITIU AAaAllaC OOLT OMIT! IIBflATIO AASTII FACILITIU lANACIaO ONLT OFFSITI CINflATCO MASTII FACILITIU AANACIaC IASTI WMIATIO IOTN OM ANO 01 total TSO aUOOII ANO FIICINT OF lASTII total OUANTITT of ICIA IICWLATIO IASTI NANAIIO ISICTIOO UA/TIII lAII 1/ 101 lA/llllll 1/ FIICINT auNOfO OF FASTI SO Tl.l* t * A.IS t Til 1* 10.0* S *0 ION S lA/TIII *AI.OT« NMOL INI IITNOO cool NMOII OF FACILITIU USIM aiTNOO ISKTIOa III NA1A0OHS FASTI WAMTITIIS NAaOLIO ISICTION Til 1/ OATA. ILIIMOI M statu. TONS SNIFFM lAWTITIU IICIITIO IT ONSITI OFFSITI TOTAL ->ITOHSI> CONTAiailS STOIACf TANIS •TNII ST0IA6I TIIATNINT TAMS OTNOI TIIATNINT TOTAL STOI/TIIAT inaktiot fills LANOFILLS LAHO TIIATNINT OCfM OISFOSAL SWFACI IHFOUNONInTS msTt filis SUOFACI INFOUNONINTS SUM AM INFOMNOaiaTS ITMIO OISFOSAL total OISFOSAL INCINOIATOOS aiCTaiNoioFTioaiLt SOI 11 IflTT M.ATl 1N.*9* sot 1* I.AIT O.IOT O.NO* SO* 1 0 0 0 TOt 21 119.?** ll.OTN 1A0.IAN TO* 0 1.010 01 I.NIO ' 110.AON TT.NOl 1*0.110 Oil 0 • f • 000 9 7 0 7 001 9 TON f TON 001 0 0 f 0 oos 1 • 0 0 SOI 0 *.019 90.000 9*.01* so* 1 1.190 9 1.190 roi 0 0 9 • 00* 1 0 9 0 I.ONI 90.000 9*.1*1 TOt 1 l.ASO 0 l.AM HI 0 f 0 • lOAM TOTAL! 111.TIN llT.fOl A9N.011 IF* OT OFOI. INC. ISUITIT SICTloaS 1. II. Ill AM Tl SONICIt FIIFAMO FI OATA. OLMISOt 1/ SNALL IWANTITT MNIIATOOS FITN LiSS TNAM 11.i IMS/TfAl I lOOO tl/NONTNI All not IIFOITIO lUT CIHIIATOIS fITN IISSINI MANTITIfS All INCLIIOIO. It STATI-.ONLT HAIAIOOWS FASTI NAT 11 UFIITII la AOOITIOF TO ICIA IfltfLATIO NAIAIOOUS FASTI. TNI LAIUI OUAaTITT la SICTION |A AM llll IS UFOITU TO Nialallt NISSINI DATA. 1/ niilTIfls cosiaTiao of fastis it nanolim nitnoo nat occuo 11 TOO 1 1 AAS II s«so* I I ItllT •till o.;s 1.19 A.IT I.IT I.AA 0 . 1 * a/i a/A F/A a/A a.M 1.11 a/A I.M a/A 0 . 0 * 0.00 O.iO O.IS 0.01 o.oo 0.00 0 . 0 * O.ON a/i 0.01 o.oo 0.01 N/A a/* 0.00 a/A 0.00 a/A 0.00 a/A a/A 0.00 a/A a/A • OATA. OLOSISOI Source: Prepared by DPRA from the 1985 Biennial Report SAS Data Library. IV-5 choosing the larger generation value, missing data are minimized while utilizing reported state data. A state-by-state analysis of Section I and Section III data is presented in Appendix A. The facilities list provided by each state in Section II of the Biennial Program Report yielded the totals of RCRA-regulated TSD facilities and the numbers of facilities handling onsite, offsite, or both categories of wastes. The total quantity of RCRA-regulated waste managed was obtained from either Section II or Section VI of the 1985 State Biennial Program Report -- whichever is larger. Again, missing data within either Sections II or VI were present, and the use of the larger value minimizes the missing value problem while utilizing state-reported data as provided. \/ The disposition of waste by handling method reflects the total amounts of waste (onsite and offsite) shown for each handling method covered in Section VI of the state report. The overall RCRA-regulated Section VI total should ideally equal the total amount of RCRA and state-regulated waste managed as reported in Section II. For many of the states, the amounts are not identical. The reasons vary but mostly reflect missing data in Sections II or VI and double counting problems as indicated in Chapter III. 2. Quantities of Waste Shipped Out-of-State On the second page of the State Summary Profile, each state's shipments of hazardous waste out of state for further processing are reported. The profile shows the quantities shipped by their state destinations (as reported by the state of origin). Also shown on each state's second-page 1/ Section II of the 1985 Biennial Report survey contains managed quantities by TSD facility while Section VI contains managed quantities by waste code and handling method. The state totals are presumed to be the same for both sections. Hence, the approach indicated utilizes available data without introducing any statistical bias. IV-6 profile is a sumnary of the "imports" of hazardous wastes, i.e., quantities of hazardous wastes shipped to the state from other states, based on the quantities from all states who reported having shipped-out such hazardous wastes. It is noted that these imports were not reported by the receiving state and no verification of these data by state was feasible within the scope of study. The import-export data do represent both RCRA and state-regulated hazardous wastes. Potentially state-regulated wastes in one state are exported to an exempt state for nonhazardous waste management; hence, the receiving state would not "verify" the receipt of hazardous waste by their state standards. 3. Hazardous Waste Stream Detail Ranking The third page of the profile shows the relative rank by volume of the nation's 50 most prevalent hazardous wastes. For example, waste code D002 accounts for the largest single volume among the 50 most prevalent wastes; code K018 ranks fiftieth, the least volume shown. The table also compares the particular state's data to those national rankings. The table shows the amount of each waste generated by that state and the rank of the waste in the state's total waste volume. The last column indicates what percent each waste contributes to the state's total. The state and territory summary profiles, presented in alphabetical order, follow. IV-7 itin ri#t< w-'ti ♦srit JOft ri#t< i^tv>■ ' . 'n n 25H ^6 yfl i)ib •^♦WV rtorift^MMAy pn bfig »ii 5 « ‘>tF Riport — whic II or vl w^'e pr'QiiCfii, inJ ute f^y vaht/ ft\>'' 'inV ,issnn5 >Oti« ‘r-.s-rr* wt-tl, «t ^ '•& -ini i^* ^6 U - - ^ »*V'Sfcr 10 JnumB vtiT 1^1 n' ffSTOl {‘9lfi4£ •fb'M 9 ;^SOW rtDOO tifrtWjii* xio^rnoJ b/T« fiisjs fwfT 4^.’ .wcffo> Or ch* siscon^ thf St*'r S:iT»k^'i> Pro^Mr, Siv»t.o’s sh'r/''^nt5 ;,< hororccHil wa$i.0 ‘3WI^‘ .tf far further t»rt raparttd* s-rafll-* ^J*awi •''« cttorttitlos sft^pp«4 w/ th^tlr is#stin«^.*ons (A “tportoii liy ftO »t»w 0 ^ Dr^'^^n'). Atio sficwn on ^4cf py T^O w^<]c i-sct^c*' ify wj\iu- cod# and Mnd■ ?r,g wtfwd. ’’h# ^iU Miti|5 p ? b« th* WT*# 'or {K)t^ '-oct^' ncfi a, thy 'n0i-:4:.«rJ utOUel >-i^U wUn;.it frtrf;«i:tC‘*iS Ofi’r bU», L . «• V.-vi . v - ■..- L j..' < .:‘:;:‘^;l 'pt#’ •j ■'J^ 1985 BIENNIAL REPORT STATE PROFI.E FOR THE STATE OF ALABAMA (TABLE 1 OF 3) TOTAL NU1BER OF RCRA RE3ULATED LARGE GENERATORS (SECTION lA): 1/ TOTAL QUANTITY (TONS) OF REGULATED RASTE GENERATED (SEC. lA/IIlB): It 7,^05*159 RCRA REGULATED TSD FACILITIES (SECTION II) FACILITIES MANAGING ONLY ONSITE GENERATED RASTE: FACILITIES MANAGING ONLY OFFSITE GENERATED 4ASTE: FACILITIES MANAGING RASTE GENERATED BOTH ON AND OFFSITE: TOTAL TSD NUMBER AND PERCENT OF RASTE: TOTAL QUANTITY OF RCRA REGULATED RASTE MANAGED (SECTION IIA/VI): 1/ 2 17 IB) : It 7,^06 tl69 PERCENT number OF RASTE 53 9A.16 3 D.OD V, 5 5.8 3 y. 66 100 X ) : 7,592.981 HANDLING METHOD CODE NUMBER OF facilities USING METHOD (SECTION II) HAZARDOUS 1 ONSITE WASTE QUANTITIES (SECTION VI) 3/ OFFSITE HANDLED total CONTAINERS SOI 29 4,161 576 4,737 STORAGE TAN 1985 biennial REPORT STATE PROFILE FOR THE STATE OF AlAS 0 0 0 0 TREATMENT TANKS TOl 3 3*676 657 4*333 OTHER TREATMENT T04 7 25*296 252 25*547 total stor/treat 29*663 2*909 32*572 INJECTION WELLS 079 0 0 0 0 LANDFILLS 08D 3 294 0 294 LAND TREATMENT 081 0 0 0 0 OCEAN DISPOSAL D82 0 0 0 0 SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS D83 0 0 0 0 WASTE PILES S03 . 4 106*486 0 106*436 SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS S04 5 13*323 0 13*323 SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS T02 0 0 0 0 OTHER disposal D84 1 8 0 8 TOTAL disposal 120*111 0 120*111 INCINERATORS TOO 2 420 0 420 RECYCLING(OPTIONAL) ROI 0 0 0 0 GRAND total: 150*195 2*909 153*103 source: prepared for EPA by DPRA, INC. (SURVEY SECTIONS I* II* III AND VI DATA. DL8S350) 1/ SMALL QUANTITY GENERATORS MITM LESS THAN 13.2 TONS/YEAR (1000 KG/MONTH) ARE NOT REPORTED BUT GENERATORS MITH MISSING QUANTITIES ARE INCLUDED. 2/ STATE-ONLY HAZARDOUS ^ASTE MAY BE REPORTED IN ADDITION TO RCRA REGULATED HAZARDOUS liASTE. THE LARGER QUANTITY IN SECTION lA AND IIIB IS REPORTED TO MINIMIZE MISSING DATA. 3/ multiple counting of WASTES BY HANDLING METHOD MAY OCCUR. 1985 biennial report STATE PROFI.E FOR THE STATE OF COLORADO (TABLE 2 OF 3) TOTAL QUANTITY OF HAZARDOUS WASTE TOTAL QUANTITY OF HAZARDOUS WASTE reported shipped out of state reported shipped FROi OTHER STATES (EXPORTS): (IMPORTS): 1/ RECEIVING STATE TONS SHIPPED ALABAMA 3,960 ARKANSAS 7 -/ 7 - 1985 BIENNIAL REPORT STATE PROFILE FOR THE STATE OF CONNECTICLir (TABLE 1 OF 3) TOTAL NUNBER OF RCRA RE3JLATEO LARGE GENERATORS (SECTION lA): 1/ 37b TOTAL QUANTITY (TONS) OF REGULATED ^ASTE GENERATED (SEC. lA/IIIB): 2/ 173*011 PERCENT RCRA REGULATED TSD FACILITIES (SECTION II) NUNBER OF WASTE facilities IANAGING only ONSITE GENERATED WASTE: 109 35.02 'L FACILITIES MANAGING ONLY OFFSITE GENERATED WASTE: 13 53.8A X facilities MANAGING WASTE GENERATED BOTH ON AND OFFSITE: 11 11.IH 'L TOTAL TSD NUMBER AND per: ENT OF WASTE: 138 100 x TOTAL QUANTITY OF RCRA REGULATED WASTE MANAGED (SECTION I lA/VI): 174*213 NUMBER OF HAZARDOUS WASTE QUANTITIES handled facilities (SECTION VI) 3/ USING METHOD HANDLING METHOD CODE (SECTION II) ONSITE OFFSITE total CONTAINERS SOI 99 5*419 6*510 11*928 STORAGE TANKS S02 31 4*884 5*312 10*196 OTHER STORAGE S05 0 0 0 0 TREATMENT TANKS TOl 7 164 38,119 38*283 OTHER TREATMENT T04 23 2*061 46*531 48*592 total stdr/treat 12*528 96*472 109*300 INJECTION WELLS D79 0 0 0 0 LANDFILLS 08D b 942 5*176 6*118 LAND TREATMENT D81 0 0 D 0 OCEAN DISPOSAL 082 0 0 0 0 SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS 083 3 10*468 0 10*468 WASTE PILES S03 3 2*486 140 2*626 SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS S0<» ' 16 6*103 0 6*103 SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS T02 3 74 490 563 OTHER DISPOSAL 084 0 0 0 0 TOTAL disposal 20*072 5*805 25*878 INCINERATORS T03 1 0 0 0 RECYCLING(OPTIONAl) ROl 0 33*051 6* 155 39*206 GRAND total: 65*651 108*433 174*084 SOURCE: PREPARED FOR EPA BY DPRA, INC. (SURVEY SECTIONS I* II* III AND VI DATA. aL88350) 1/ SMALL aUAKTITY GENERATORS WITH LESS THAN 13.2 TONS/YEAR (1000 KG/MONTH) ARE N3T REPORTED BUT GENERATORS WITH MISSING QUANTITIES ARE INCLUDED. 2/ STATE-ONLY HAZARDOUS WASTE MAY BE REPORTED IN ADDITION TO RCRA REGULATED HAZARDOUS WASTE. THE LARGER QUANTITY IN SECTION lA AND IIIB IS REPORTED TO MINIMIZE MISSING DATA. 3/ MULTIPLE COUNTING OF WASTES BY HANDLING METHOD MAY OCCUR. 1985 BIENNIAL REPORT STATE PROFILE FOR THE STATE OF CONNECTICUT (TABLE 2 OF 3) TOTAL QUANTITY OF HAZARDOUS WASTE total quantity of hazardous WASTE REPORTED SHIPPED OUT OF STATE REPORTED SHIPPED FROM OTHER STATES (EXPORTS): (IMPORTS): 1/ RECEIVING TONS STATES SHIPPING TONS STATE SHIPPED TO CONNECTICUT SHIPPED ALABAMA 524 ALABAMA 11 FLORIDA 25 FLORIDA 49 FOREIGN 23*273 GEORGIA 0 ILLINOIS 326 IOWA 49 KENTUCKY 395 ILLINOIS 12 LOUISIANA 371 INDIANA 1 MASSACHUS ETTS 3,979 MASSACHUSETTS 17,629 MARYLAND 43 MARYLAND 71 MICHIGAN 913 MAINE 1,276 MISSOURI 23 MICHIGAN 7 NORTH CAROLINA 2,429 MINNESOTA 90 NEW JERSEY 10 ,233 MISSOURI 0 NEW YORK 9,020 NORTH CAROLINA 60 OHIO 5,882 new HAMPSHIRE 15 PENNSYLVANIA 14,494 NEW JERSEY 3,549 RHODE ISLAND 734 NEW YORK 6,273 SOUTH CAROLINA 5,004 OHIO 1 TEXAS 54 PENNSYLVANIA 3,558 VIRGINIA 1,426 PUERTO RICO 16 WISCONSIN 67 RHODE island 3,321 VIRGINIA 151 TOTAL 76,212 VERMONT 687 WASHINGTON 5 WISCONSIN 50 TOTAL 36,582 source: prepared FOR EPA BY OPRA, INC. (SURVEY SECTION IV DATA. 0L8835O) 1/ THE 3UANTITIES REPRESENT THE TONS REPORTED BY SHIPPING STATES. TONS SHIPPED HAY INCLUDE STATE-ONLY REGULATED HAZARDOUS .^ASTE. QUANTITIES RECEIVED BY EACH STATE .4ERE NOT REQUESTED. 1985 BIE'iHIAL REPORT STATE PROFILE FOR THE STATE OF CONNeCTICOT (TABLE 3 OF 3) iJASTE STREAM GE,DERATION STATE RANKING COMPARED TO NATIONAL RANKING (TOP FIFTY) NATIONAL RANK WASTE CODE 3UANT1TY GENERATED IN state (TONS) state WASTE CODE RANK PERCENT OF STATE TOTA^ 1 0002 42,674 1 23.97 2 MOMX 1,519 15 0.85 3 OOMX 8,281 7 4.65 4 000.7 8,643 5 4.85 5 <0MX NONE N/A N/ A 6 F003 2,785 11 1.56 7 0003 1,696 13 0.95 8 0001 20,456 4 11.49 9 <062 544 20 0.30 10 F006 35,629 2 20.01 11 <061 1,043 18 0.58 12 FOMX 8,594 6 4.82 13 0008 21,153 3 11.88 lA K104 NONE N/A N/A 15 <013 NONE N/A N/A 16 <011 NONE N/A N/A 17 <087 NONE N/A N/A 18 P020 NONE N/A N/A 19 F002 1,652 14 0.92 20 <016 NONE N/A N/A 21 U036 NONE N/A N/A 22 <048 none N/A N/A 23 F007 1,491 16 0.83 2A UOMX 117 26 0.06 25 F005 1,923 12 1.08 26 FOOl 4,823 9 2.70 27 <051 NONE N/A N/A 28 F019 81 32 0.04 29 0005 551 19 0.30 30 <001 NONE N/A N/A 31 <049 NONE N/A N/A 32 0000 74 34 0.04 33 0006 3,163 10 1.77 34 F009 1,355 17 0.76 35 0009 40 39 0.02 36 <047 NONE N/A N/A 37 F024 NONE N/A N/A 38 0004 7 48 0.00 39 <022 NONE N/A N/A 40 <044 170 24 0.09 41 J188 62 36 0.03 42 <071 NONE N/A N/A 43 0010 <1 09 0.00 44 K060 NONE N/A N/A 45 J220 167 25 0.09 46 K002 NONE N/A N/A 47 K031 NONE N/A N/A 40 <052 NONE N/A N/A 49 <003 NONE N/A N/A 50 <010 NONE N/A N/A SOURCE: PREPARED FOR EPA BY DPRA, INC. (SURVEY section IIIB DATA. DL88350) 1905 biennial report STATE PROFUE FOR THE STATE OF DELA. NEW JERSEY 9,190 PENNSYLVANIA I RHODE ISLAND 25 TEXAS 0 TOTAL 9,223 total 70,230 SOURCE: PREPARED FOR EPA BY DPRA, INC. (SURVEY SECTION IV DATA. 0L98350) 1/ THE 3JANTITIES REPRESENT THE TONS REPORTED BY SHIPPING STATES. TONS SHIPPED MAY INCLUDE STATE-ONLY REGULATED HAZARDOUS WASTE. QUANTITIES RECEIVED BY EACH STATE WERE NOT REQUESTED. -M- 1905 biennial report STATE PROFIuE FOR THE STATE OF OELAi^ARE (TABLE 3 OF 3) WASTE STREAM GENERATION STATE RANKING COMPARED TO NATIONAL RANKING (TOP FIFTY) NATIONAL RANK WASTE CODE OUANTITY GENERATED IN STATE (TONS) STATE WASTE CODE RANK PERCENT OF STATE total 1 0002 2.858 6 3.02 2 MOMX NONE N/A N/ A 3 OOHX NONE N/A N/A 4 0007 3,510 5 3.71 5 KOMX NONE N/A N/ A 6 F003 1,123 12 1.18 7 0003 21 18 0.02 8 0001 NONE N/A N/ A 9 <06 2 1,408 11 1.48 10 F006 305 16 0.32 11 <061 55,781 1 59.01 12 FOMX NONE N/A N/A 13 0008 1,824 10 1.92 14 K104 NONE N/A N/A 15 K013 NONE N/A N/A 16 <011 NONE N/A N/ A 17 <087 NONE N/A N/A 18 P020 NONE N/A N/A 19 F002 613 14 0.64 20 <016 NONE N/A N/A 21 U036 NONE N/A N/A 22 <048 1,940 9 2.05 23 F007 NONE N/A N/A 24 UOMX NONE N/A N/A 25 F005 23 17 0.02 26 FOOl 20 20 0.02 27 <051 8,719 2 9.22 28 F019 NONE N/A N/A 29 0005 6 21 0.00 30 <001 . NONE N/A N/A 31 <049 NONE N/A N/A 32 0000 NONE N/A N/A 33 0006 NONE N/A N/A 34 F009 NONE N/A N/A 35 0009 6,850 3 7.24 36 <047 NONE N/A N/A 37 F024 NONE N/A N/A 38 0004 320 15 0.33 39 <022 NONE N/A N/A 40 <044 NONE N/A N/A 41 J188 1 23 0.00 42 <071 3,633 4 3.84 43 0010 NONE N/A N/A 44 K060 NONE N/A N/A 45 0220 NONE N/A N/A 46 <002 NONE N/A N/A 47 <031 NONE N/A N/A 46 <052 NONE N/A N/A 49 <083 NONE N/A N/A 50 <018 NONE N/A N/A SOURCE: PREPARED FOR EPA BY DPRA, INC. (SURVEY SECTION IIIB DATA. ')L88350) 1905 3IENMIAL REPORT STATE PROFILE FOR THE STATE OF DISTRICT 3? COlUIBIA (TABLE 1 3F 3) TOTAL NUiBER OF RCRA REGJLATED LARGE GENERATORS (SECTION lA): 1/ TOTAL QUANTITY (TONS) OF REGULATED #(ASTE GENERATED (SEC. lA/IIlB): 2/ RCRA REGJLATED TSO FACILITIES (SECTION II) NUiBER facilities MANAGING ONLY ONSITE GENERATED »^ASTE: 33 20.5h L facilities IANAGING only offsite generated /^ASTE: 10 22.18 •. facilities managing -^ASTE generated BuTH on A.nO OFFSITE: 3 37.23 . TOTAL TSO NUNBER AND PERCENT OF /^ASTE: 100 •. TOTAL QUANTITY OF RCRA REGULATED RASTE '1ANAGED (SECTION IIA/VI): 94,93c TOTAL QUANTITY OF RCRA REGULATED RASTE '1ANAGED (SECTION IIA/VI): 94,93c HANDLING METHOD CODE NUMBER OF facilities US ING METHOD (SECTION II) HAZARDOUS M ONSITE ASTE QUANTITIES (SECTION VI) 3/ OFFSITE handled total CONTAINERS SOI 30 595 -( TONS )- 629 1,2 24 STORAGE TANKS S02 8 493 502 995 OTHER STORAGE SOS 0 0 0 0 TREATMENT TANKS TOl 7 49,583 33,329 82,912 OTHER TREATMENT T04 3 50 12 62 TOTA. STOR/TREAT INJECTION WELLS 079 0 50,721 0 34,472 0 85,193 0 LANDFILLS D80 2 3 2,737 2,790 LAND TREATMENT D81 0 0 0 0 OCEAN DISPOSAL D82 0 0 D 0 SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS D83 0 0 0 0 WASTE PILES S03 1 71 0 71 SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS S04 3 1,925 0 1,925 SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS T02 3 1 , 304 D 1 ,304 OTHER DISPOSAL 084 1 158 0 153 total disposal INCINERATORS T03 3 3,481 3,491 2,787 0 6,248 3,491 RECYCLING(OPTIONAL) ROl 0 0 D 0 GRAND total: 57,673 37,259 94,932 SOURCE: PREPARED FOR EPA BY DPRA, INC. (SURVEY SECTIONS I, II, III AND VI DATA. OL9035O) 1/ SMALL QUANTITY GENERATORS WITH LESS THAN 13.2 TONS/YEAR (1000 KG/HONTH) ARE NOT REPORTED BUT GENERATORS WITH HISSING QUANTITIES ARE INCLUDED. 2/ STATE-ONLY HAZARDOUS WASTE MAY BE REPORTED IN ADDITION TO RCRA REGJLATED HAZARDOUS WASTE. THE LARGER QUANTITY IN SECTION lA AND IIIB IS REPORTED TO MINIMIZE MISSING DATA. 3/ MULTIPLE COUNTING OF WASTES 3Y HANDLING METHOD MAY OCCUR. 1985 BIENNIAL REPORT STATE PROFILE FOR THE STATE OF lO^A (TABLE 2 OF 3) TOTAL QUANTITY OF HAZARDOUS >^ASTE TOTAL QUANTITY OF HAZARDOUS WASTE REPORTED SHIPPED OUT OF STATE REPORTED SHIPPED FROM OTHER STATES (EXPORTS): (IMPORTS): 1/ RECEIVING TONS states SHIPPING TONS STATE SHIPPED TO IOWA SHIPO£0 ALABAMA L» 373 ILLINOIS 18 ARKANSAS 25 M INNESOTA 1,518 CALI^ORNIA 2 M I S S OU RI 5 COLORADO 95 NEBRASKA 8 4 CONNECTICUT 49 WISCONSIN 3, 80 1 =OREIGN 2 ILLINO IS 5,440 TOTAL 8,42-^ INDIANA 1,010 KANSAS 116 KENTUCKY 811 LOUISIANA 1,190 MICHIGAN 92 MINNESOTA 4,587 NEBRASKA 74 NEW JERSEY 74 NEVADA 54 OHIO 325 OKLAHOMA 53 PENNSYLVANIA 5 SOUTH DAKOTA 27 TENNESSEE 1 TEXAS 253 WISCONSIN 2,591 TOTAL 19,259 SOURCE: PREPARED FOR EPA BY DPRA, INC . (SURVEY SECTION IV DATA. DL88350) 1/ THE QUANTITIES REPRESENT THE TONS RE=>ORTED BY SHIPPING states, tons shippe HAY INCLUDE STATE-ONLY REGULATED HAZARDOUS WASTE. QUANTITIES RECEIVED BY EACH STATE WERE NOT REQUESTED. 1985 BIENNIAL REPORT STATE PROFIlE FOR THE STATE OF I04A (TABLE 3 JF 3 ) »^ASTE STREAM GENERATION STATE RANKING COMPARED TO NATIONAu RANKING (TOP FI^TY) NATIONAL WASTE QUANTITY GENERATED STATE «ASTE PERCENT OF RANK CODE IN STATE (TONS) CODE RANK STATE total 1 0002 18,151 3 15.02 2 lOIX 4,964 6 4. 10 3 DONX 34,380 2 28.43 4 0007 35,673 1 29.52 5 SOUTH CAROLINA 1,2o9 TENNESSEE 207 TOTAL 89,626 TEXAS 169 VIRGINIA 442 TOTAL 132,953 SOURCE: PREPARED FOR EPA BY OPRA, INC. (SURVEY SECTION IV DATA. 0LB8350) 1/ THE 3JANTITIES REPRESENT THE TONS REPORTED BY SHIPPING STATES. TONS SHIPPE MAY INCLUDE STATE-ONLY REGULATED HAZAROOUS .^ASTE. 3JANTITIES RECEIVED BY EACH STATE WERE NOT REQUESTED. 1985 biennial report STATE PROFI.E FOR TiE STATE OF flARY^AND (TABLE 3 OF 3) .4ASTE stream GENERATION STATE RANKING COMPARED TO NATIONAL RANKING (TOP FIETY) NATIONAL RANK MASTE CODE quantity generated IN STATE (TONS ) STATE ^ASTE CODE rank PERCENT 0 STATE TOT 1 0002 180,917 2 25.90 2 MOMX lA,823 6 2.12 3 DOMX 333,069 1 A7.69 A 0007 9A,80A 3 13.57 5 ARE NOT REPORTED BUT GENERATORS mITH MISSING QUANTITIES ARE INCLUDED. 2/ STATE-ONLY HAZARDOUS RASTE MAY BE REPORTED IN ADDITION TO RCRA REGULATED HAZARDOUS RASTE. THE LARGER QUANTITY IN SECTION lA ANO IIIB IS REPORTED TQ MINIMIZE MISSING DATA. 3/ multiple COUNTING OF RASTES BY HANDLING METHOD MAY OCCUR. 1985 BIENNIAL REPORT STATE PROFILE FOR T-lE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI (TABLE 2 OF 3) TOTAL QUANTITY OF HAZARDOUS WASTE total QUANTITY OF HAZARDOUS AST£ reported shipped OUT OF STATE REPORTED SHIPPED FROM OTHER STATES (EXPORTS): (IMPORTS): 1/ RECEIVING TONS STATES SHIPPING TONS STATE SHIPPED TO MISSISSIPPI SHIPPED ALABAMA 6,DBA - ALABAMA 26 7 ARKANSAS 8,21A ARKANSAS 77 =OREIGN A27 FLORIDA 13 ILLINOIS 20 INDIANA 2 6 6 INDIANA Ab3 KENTUCKY 42 KENTUCKY 2,359 uOUI SI ANA 2 3, 45 7 LOUISIANA ,6d3 MISSOURI 6d MICHIGAN A OHIO 62 MISSOURI 31 TENNESSEE 492 OHIO 7 TEXAS 339 OKLAHOMA 10,512 WEST VIRGINIA 24 PENNSYLVANIA 1,163 TENNESSEE 7,715 TOTAL 2 3,109 TEXAS 623 WISCONSIN 32 TOTAL 33,362 SOURCE: PREPARED FDR EPA BY DPRA, INC . (SURVEY SECTION IV DATA. OL9035O) 1/ THE QUANTITIES REPRESENT THE TONS REPORTED BY SHIPPING STATES. TONS SHIPP MAY INCLJOE state-only REGULATED HAZARDOUS WASTE. EACH STATE WERE NOT REQUESTED. QUANTITIES RECEIVED BY - 75 - 1585 BIENNIAL REPORT STATE PROFILE F3R TriE STATE 3F MISSISSIP®! (TABLE 3 OF 3) ^ASTE STREA*1 GENERATION STATE RANKING CONPAKED TO NATIONA. RANKING (TOP FIFTY) NATIONA. RANK <^ASTE CODE ouantity generated IN STATE (TONS) state haste CODE RANK PERCENT OF state TOTAw 1 0002 2 40,587 4 9.59 2 lonx 2,919 11 0.11 3 OONX 742,040 1 29.59 A 0007 640,418 2 25.5 4 5 <0^X 950 16 0.03 6 F003 213 25 0.00 7 0003 18,851 7 0.75 0 0001 75,467 6 3.00 9 <062 642 19 0.02 iO F006 2,408 12 0.09 11 <061 NONE N/A N/ A 12 FONX 1,319 15 0.05 13 0008 1,740 13 0.06 14 <104 202,623 5 3.08 15 <013 NONE N/A N/ A 16 <011 NONE N/A N/A 17 <087 NONE N/A N/A 18 P020 550,383 3 21.94 19 F002 235 24 0.00 20 <016 NONE N/A N/A 21 J036 none N/A N/A 22 <048 710 17 0.02 23 F007 461 20 0.01 24 UOMX 42 30 0.00 25 F005 8,199 9 0,32 26 FOOl 425 21 0.01 27 <051 1,454 14 0.05 28 F019 4 44 0.00 29 0005 NONE N/A N/A 30 <001 9,929 8 0,39 31 <049 64 29 0.00 32 0000 9 39 0.00 33 0006 NONE N/A N/ A 34 F009 NONE N/A N/A 35 0009 9 40 0.00 36 <047 NONE N/A N/ A 37 F024 NONE N/A N/ A 38 0004 1 56 0.00 39 <022 2 49 0.00 40 <044 NONE N/A N/A 41 J188 298 23 0.01 42 <071 NONE N/A N/A 43 0010 NONE N/A N/ A 44 <060 NONE N/A N/ A 45 U220 20 35 0.00 46 <002 NONE N/A N/A 47 <031 NONE N/A N/ A 48 <052 <1 65 0.00 49 <083 3,474 10 0.13 50 <018 NONE N/A N/ A SOURCE: PREPARED FOR EPA BY DPRA, INC. (SURVEY SECTION IIIB DATA. 0L33350) 1985 BIENNIAL REPORT STATE PRQFI.E FOR T^E STATE OF filSSQJRI (TABLE 1 OF 3) RCRA REGJLATEO TSD FACILITIES (SECTION II) facilities managing ONLT onsite generated WASTE: facilities managing only offsite generated WASTE: facilities 'MANAGING WASTE GENERATED BOTH ON AND OFFSITE: TOTAL TSO NU13ER AND PERCENT OF WASTE: TOTAL OUANTITY OF RCRA REGULATED WASTE MANAGED (ScCTiUN IIA/VI): 1/ I9L 13 ) : 2/ 68,113 PERCENT NUMBER OF WASTE 25.8 6 :: A1 10.82 •/. 9 b3.3E •/. 96 100 ) : 34,09Z HANDLING METHOD CODE NUMBER OF FACILITIES USING METHOD (SECTION II) hazardous onsite »*ASTE OUANTiriES (SECTION VI) 3/ OFFSITE handled total -( TONS )- CONTAINERS SOI 40 5,432 0 5,432 STORAGE TANKS S02 7 67 3 67 OTHER STORAGE S05 2 2,091 0 2,091 TREATMENT TANKS TOl 8 0 0 0 OTHER TREATMENT T04 8 1,659 0 1,659 TOTA. STOR/TREAT 9,249 0 9,24«) INJECTION WELLS 079 2 9 0 9 LANDFILLS D80 9 17,111 3 17,111 LAND TREATMENT D81 0 0 0 0 OCEAN DISPOSAL D82 0 0 0 0 SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS D83 0 0 0 0 WASTE PILES S03 1 55 0 55 SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS S04 9 2,709 0 2,709 SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS T02 2 2 0 2 OTHER DISPOSAL D84 9 926 0 926 TOTAL DISPOSAL 20,811 0 20,811 INCINERATORS TOO 14 3,348 3 3,343 RECYCLING(OPTIONA. ) ROl 0 0 0 0 GRAND total: 33,407 0 33,407 source: PREPARED FOR EPA BY DPRA, INC. (SURVEY SECTIONS I, II, III AND VI DATA. DL88350) 1/ SMALL QUANTITY GENERATORS WITH LESS THAN 13.2 TONS/YEAR (1000 KG/MONTH) ARE NOT REPORTED BUT GENERATORS WITH MISSING 3JANTIT1ES ARE INCLUDED. 2/ STATE-ONLY HAZARDOUS WASTE MAY BE REPORTED IN ADDITION TO RCRA REGJLATtO HAZARDOUS WASTE. THE LARGER 3JANTITY IN SECTION lA AND IIIB IS REPORTED TO MINIMIZE MISSING DATA. 3/ multiple COUNTING OF WASTES BY HANDLING METHOD MAY OCCUR. - 11 - l'J85 BIENNIAL REPORT STATE PROFI.E FOR THE STATE OF HISS3JRI (TABLE I OF 3) TOTAL QUANTITY OF HAZARDOUS WASTE TOTAL QUANTITY OF HAZARDOUS WASTE REPORTED SHIPPED OUT OF STATE REPORTED SHIPPED FROM OTHER S TATES (EXPORTS): (IMPORTS): 1/ RECEIVING TONS STATES Shipping TONS STATE SHIPPED ro MISSOURI SHIPPED ALABAMA 1 ♦ 006 ALABAMA 15 ARKANSAS 1 » 309 ARKANSAS 1,020 ARIZONA 11 CALIFORNIA 5o COLORADO 9 CONNECT!OUT 23 CONNECTICUT 0 ILLINOIS 4, Z6 3 -OREIGN 6,074 INDIANA 40 IOWA 5 KANSAS 578 ILLINOIS 12,848 MASSACHUSETTS 1,13 1 INDIANA 5,213 MARYLAND 2 18 KANSAS 3,625 MAINE 68 KENTUCKY 2,733 MINNESOTA 229 LOUISIANA 2,515 M I S S OU R I 5 MICHIGAN 335 MISSISSIPPI 3 1 MINNESOTA 1,733 NEBRASKA 54 MISSOURI 5 NEW JERSEY 465 MISSISSIPPI 68 NEW MEXICO 1 NEBRASKA 7 NEW YORK 539 NEW JERSEY d8 OKLAHOMA 42 NEW YORK 174 RHODE ISLAND 16 1 OHIO 939 TENNESSEE 134 OKLAHOMA 3,343 VIRGINIA 19 PENNSYLVANIA 2 VERMONT 3 SOUTH CAROLINA 29 WISCONSIN 20 TENNESSEE 374 TEXAS 233 TOTAL 9,621 UTAH 7 WISCONSIN 1,009 TOTAL 4 3,6 o6 SOURCE: PREPARED FOR EPA BY DPRA, INC. (SURVEY SECTION IV DATA . Dl88350) 1/ THE QUANTITIES REPRESENT THE TONS REPORTED BY SHIPPING STATES. TONS SHIPPE. MAY INCLUDE STATE-ONLY REGUlATEO HAZARDOUS WASTE. 3JANTITIES RECEIVED BY EACH STATE WERE NOT REQUESTED. 1905 BIENNIAL REPORT STATE PROFI.E FOR TriE STATE OF fllSSOJRI (TABLE 3 OF 3) WASTE STREAM GENERATION STATE RANKING COMPARED TO NATIONAL RANKING (TOP FIFTY) NATIONAL RANK WASTE CODE OUANTITY GENERATED IN state (TONS) STATE WASTE CODE rank PERCENT OF STATE total 1 0002 15»662 1 2A.58 2 NONX A27 15 0.67 3 OONX 163 19 0.25 4 0007 2,510 9 3.93 5 0RTED BY SHIPPING STATES. TONS SHIPP MAY INCLUDE STATE-ONLY REGULATED HAZARDOUS wASTE. QUANTITIES RECEIVED BY EACH STATE WERE NOT REQUESTED. 199 5 BIEN'JIAL ^EPQt^T ST4TE PKQFI.E FOR T-»E STATE 3F nONTA'^A (TABLE 3 3F 3) WASTE STREA1 GENERATION STATE RAN 543 ,44b PERCE NT OF WASTE 3 2 . 9 ^ 13.37 :: 3.19 •. TOTAL TSD NUMBER AND PERCENT OF WASTE: 3 100 total quantity of RCRA REGULATED WASTE MANAGED (SECTION I I A/VI): 5,01 NUMBER OF HAZARDOUS WASTE QUANTITIES handled facilities (SECTION VI) 3/ USING method HANDLING METHOD CODE (SECTION II) ONSITE OFFSITE total -—( TONS )—■ CONTAINERS SOI 6 140 6o 9 809 STORAGE TANKS S02 3 0 35 35 OTHER STORAGE SOS 1 5 5 10 TREATMENT TANKS TOl 1 41 19 60 OTHER TREATMENT T04 2 1 ,699 17 1,716 tota. stor/treat 1,885 744 2,629 INJECTION WELLS D79 0 0 0 0 LANDFILLS D8D 0 0 0 0 LAND TREATMENT 081 0 0 D 0 OCEAN DISPOSAL 082 0 0 0 0 SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS 083 0 0 0 0 WASTE PILES S03 0 0 D 0 SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS S04 2 2,386 0 2,336 SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS T02 0 0 0 0 OTHER DISPOSAL 084 0 0 D 0 TOTAL disposal 2,386 0 2,386 INCINERATORS T03 0 0 0 0 RECYCL ING(0PTI0;NAL ) ROl 0 0 0 0 GRAND total: 4,271 7 44 5,015 SOURCE: PREPARED FOR EP A BY DPRA, INC. (SURVEY SECTIONS I , II, III AND V I DATA. DL88350) 1/ SMALL QUANTITY GENERATORS WITH LESS THAN 13.2 TONS/YEAR (1000 KG/MONTH) ARE NOT REPORTED BUT GENERATORS WITH MISSING QUANTITIES ARE INCLUDED. 2/ STATE-ONLY HAZARDOUS WASTE MAY BE REPORTED IN ADDITION TO RCRA REGULATED HAZARDOUS WASTE. THE LARGER QUANTITY IN SECTION lA AND III0 IS REPORTED TQ MINIMIZE MISSING DATA. 3/ multiple COUNTING OF WASTES BY HANDLING METHOD MAY OCCUR. 1985 BIENNIAL i^cPORT STATE PROFI.E F3R THE STATE DF NE8 RaS: 0.0 0 >: 0.0 J 7. LOO 4 total OUANTITY of RCRA REGULATED WASTE MANAGED (SECTION liA/VI): HANDLING METHOD CODE NUMBER UF facilities US ING METHOD (SECTION II) HAZARDOUS ONSITE WASTE QUANTITIES (SECTION VI) 3/ OFFSITE handled total -(TONS )- CONTAINERS SOI 0 130 0 130 STORAGE TANKS S02 0 &8 D 58 OTHER STORAGE SOS 0 0 D 0 TREATMENT TANKS TOl 0 159 0 159 OTHER TREATMENT T04 0 25 0 25 TOTA. STDR/TREAT AAA D AAA INJECTION WELLS 07? 0 111 0 111 LANDFILLS U8D 0 22 0 22 LAND TREATMENT D81 0 1,059 D 1,059 OCEAN DISPOSAL D82 0 0 0 0 SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS 083 0 285 D ?35 WASTE PILES S03 0 0 D 0 SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS S04 • 0 0 0 0 SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS T02 0 A,A35 0 A , A85 OTHER DISPOSAL U8H 0 A3 D A3 TOTAL DISPOSAL 5,005 D 5,305 INCINE RATORS T03 0 177 0 177 RECYCLING(OPTIONAw) ROl 0 0 0 0 GRAND total: 5,625 0 5,525 source: prepared for EPA by OPRA, INC. (SURVEY SECTIONS !♦ II» III AND VI DATA. DL88350) 1/ SMALL OUANTITY GENERATORS WITH LESS THAN 13.2 TONS/YEAR (1000 KG/MONTH) ARE NOT REPORTED BUT GENERATORS WITH HISSING 3JANTITIES ARE INCLUDED. 2/ STATE-ONLY HAZARDOUS WASTE MAY BE REPORTED IN A00ITI3N TO RCRA REGULATED HAZARDOUS WASTE. THE LARGER 3UANTITY IN SECTION lA AND IIIB IS REPDRTED TO MINIMIZE MISSING DATA. 3/ MULTIPLE COUNTING OF WASTES BY HANDLING METHOD MAY OCCUR. - 96 - L?85 BIENNIAL REPORT STATE PRGFI.E FDk THE STATE JF NEW 1E 1985 biennial report STATE PR3FI.E FOR HE STATE 3F DKLAhD'IA (TABLE 1 3F 3) RCRA REGJLATED TSD FACILITIES (SECTION II) facilities 'IANAGING only onsite GENERATED RASTE: FACILITIES MANAGING ONLY OFFSITE GENERATED -liASTE: FACI-ITIES managing -^ASTE generated 30T^ ON and offsite: TOTAL TSO NUMdER AND PERCENT OF ^ASTE*. total quantity of RCRA regulated /^ASTE managed (SECTION IIA/VI): 1/ lla 13 ) : 2/ 1.591,234 PERCENT NUMBER OF ^ASTE 3D 63.5U 'L 11 23.85 X 5 7.6 5 /. 46 o o ) : 2,171,943 HANDLING METHOD CODE NUMBER OF facilities USING method (SECTION II) HA ZARD OUS ONSITE WASTE 3UANTITIES HANDLED (SECTION VI) 3/ OFFSITE total -( TONS )—■ CONTAINERS SOI 22 2,979 2,567 5,546 STORAGE TANREPARED for EPA dY DPRA, INC 1/ THE QUANTITIES REPRESENT THE TONS . (SURVEY SECTION IV DATA. DL38350) REPORTED BY SHIPPING STATES. TONS SHIPPED WAY INCLUDE state-only REGULATED HAZARDOUS WASTE. QUANTITIES RECEIVED 3Y EACH STATE WERE NUT REQUESTED. 1^85 biennial report state profile for the state of south uaota (TABLE 3 of 3) WASTE STREAM GENERATION STATE RANORTEO BY SHIPPING STATES. TONS SHIPPE MAY include state-only REGULATED HAZARDOUS WASTE. 3UANTITIES RECEIVED BY EACH STATE WERE NOT REQUESTED. L935 BI£NNIAL REPORT STATE PRQFI.E FOR THE STATE OF TENNESSEE (TABLE 3 OF 3) ^ASTE STREAI GENERATION STATE RANKING COMPARED TO NATIONA^ RANKING (TOP FIFTY) NATIONAL RANK RASTE CODE QUANTITY GENERATED IN state (TONS) state .^aste CODE RANK PERCENT OF STATE total 1 0002 336 »239 2 1.01 2 101X 32»113»455 1 96.73 3 001X NONE N/A N/ A 4 0007 194,542 4 0.58 5 KONX NONE N/A N/A 6 = 00 3 32, 140 6 0. J9 7 0003 20,540 10 0.06 0 0001 27,366 0 0.00 9 <062 102,921 5 0.31 10 = 006 5,534 1,3 0.01 11 <061 2,148 19 0.00 12 FO'IX NONE N/A N/A 13 0008 677 25 o o . o 14 <104 NONE N/A N/ A 15 <013 NONE N/A N/A 16 <011 NONE N/A N/A 17 <067 3 46 o . o 18 P020 NONE N/A N/ A 19 F002 240,776 3 0.74 20 <016 NONE N/A N/A 21 J036 16 30 0.00 22 <040 NONE N/A N/A 23 F007 31,438 7 0.09 24 JOMX NONE N/A N/A 25 F005 4,200 15 0.01 26 FOOl 4,607 14 0.01 27 <051 NONE N/A N/A 20 F019 4,040 16 0.01 29 0005 1,435 20 0.00 30 <001 1 53 o o . o 31 <049 none N/A N/A 32 0000 NONE N/A N/A 33 0006 18,103 11 0.05 34 F009 12,926 12 0.03 35 0009 325 28 0.00 36 <047 26,826 9 0.00 37 F024 1 56 0.00 38 0004 775 24 0.00 39 <022 NONE N/A N/ A 40 <044 2,700 18 0.00 41 U188 3 45 0.00 42 <071 NONE N/A N/A 43 0010 2 49 0.00 44 <060 NONE N/A N/A 45 J220 <1 61 0.00 46 <002 NONE N/A N/A 47 <031 NONE N/A N/A 40 <052 NONE N/A N/ A 49 <083 NONE N/A N/A 50 <010 NONE N/A N/A SOURCE: 3REPAREO FOR EPA bY DPRA, INC. (SURVEY SECTION. III3 DATA. 0L83350) 1^83 biennial report state PRO-ILE F3R THE STATE OF TEXAS (TABLE 1 OF 3) TOTAL NU13ER OF RCRA REGJlATED LARGE GENERATORS (SECTION lA): 1/ TOTAL quantity (TONS) OF REGULATED «ASTE GENERATED (SEC. IA/III8): 2/ 33.7b7,3R PERCEN RCRA REGJLATED TSO FACI-ITIES (SECTION II) NJiBER OF .«AST FACI-ITIES managing only onsite GENERATED ^ASTE: 573 21.9^ FACI-ITIES MANAGING ONLY OFFSITE GENERATED wASTE: 55 0.00 facilities MANAGING RASTE GENERATED BOTH ON AND OFFSITE: 524 73.Oi TOTAL TSO NUMBER AND PERCENT OF WASTE: U152 LOO total quantity of RCRA REGULATED WASTE MANAGED (SECTION IIA/VI): 41,425*17 total quantity of RCRA REGULATED WASTE MANAGED (SECTION IIA/VI): 41,425*17 HANDLING METHOD CODE number uf facilities using method (SECTION II) HAZARDOUS WASTE QUANTITIES HANDLED (SECTION VI) 3/ ONSITE offsite total -(TONS )—• CONTAINERS SOI 3H4 4,240 7,668 11,908 STORAGE TAN7 HANDLING METHOD CODE NUMBER OF FACILITIES US ING METHOD (SECTION II) HAZARDOUS WASTE QUANTITIES HANDLED (SECTION VI) 3/ ONSITE OFFSITE TOTAL -(TONS )--• CONTAINERS SOI 12 634 1,461 2,115 STORAGE TAN 3 IB ) : 2/ 24.995.D4 PERCEN NUMBER OF 1. A S T 54 9 9,33 7 D. 1=. 5 D.Ol 67 lOU total quantity of RCRA REGULATED WASTE MANAGED (SECTION IIA/VI): 24.v7D.o8 handling method CODE NUMBER OF FACILITIES USING method (SECTION II) HAZARDOUS ONSITE WASTE QUANTITI (SECTION VI) OFFSITE ES hanjled 3/ total CONTAINERS SOI 43 9,202 636 9,338 STORAGE TANKS S02 6 820 28,243 29,067 OTHER STORAGE SOS 0 0 0 0 TREATMENT TANKS TOl 4 774 0 774 DTHER TREATMENT T04 15 24,905,030 12,745 24,917,776 TOTA. STDR/TREAT 24,915,827 41,629 24,937,455 INJECTION WELLS D79 0 0 0 0 LANDFILLS 080 0 0 0 0 LAND TREATMENT 081 3 3,069 0 3,D69 OCEAN DISPOSAL 082 0 0 D 0 SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS 083 0 0 0 0 WASTE PILES S03 2 588 0 538 SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS S04 5 9,559 0 9,559 SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS T02 0 0 0 0 OTHER disposal 084 1 4 0 4 TOTAL disposal 13,220 0 13,220 incinerators T03 1 0 0 0 RECYCl ING(OPTIONA.) ROl 0 0 0 0 GRAND total: 24,929,046 41,629 24,970,675 SOURCE: PREPARED FOR EPA BY OPRA, INC. (SURVEY SECTIONS I. II. Ill AND VI DATA. 0L3835O) 1/ SMALL QUANTITY GENERATORS WITH LESS THAN 13.2 TONS/YEAR (1000 RG/MDNTH) ARE NDT REPORTED BUT GENERATORS WITH MISSING QUANTITIES ARE INCLUDED. 2/ STATE-ONLY HAZARDOUS WASTE MAY BE REPORTED IN ADDITION TD RCRA REGULATED HAZARDOUS WASTE. THE LARGER QUANTITY IN SECTION lA AND III8 IS REPORTED Tu MINIMIZE MISSING DATA. 3/ multiple COUNTING OF WASTES BY HANDLING METHOD MAY OCCUR. 4/ VIRGINIA'S REGULATED WASTE INCLUDES MAJOR QUANTITIES OF WASTEWATER, E.G., 99 PERCENT, THAT WOULD LIKELY RECEIVE TREA'mENT EXEMPTIONS ELSEWHERE. 1985 biennial report STATE PROFI.E FOR TrIE STATE OF VIRGINIA (TABLE 2 OF 3) TOTAL QUANTITY OF HAZARDOUS WASTE TOTAL QUANTITY OF HAZARDUJS. N ASTE REPORTED SHIPPED OUT OF STATE REPORTED SHIPPED FROM OTHER states (EXPORTS ) : (IMPORTS): 1/ RECEIVING TONS states SHIPPING TONS STATE SHIPPED TD VIRGINIA S H I ? P c D ALABAMA 3,03S ALABAMA 46 ARKANSAS 0 CONNECTICUT 1,42b CONNECTICUT 15 L DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 160 GEORGIA 339 DELAWARE 20 Illinois 668 FLORIDA 91 INDIANA 1»A02 GEORGIA 577 KENTUCKY 186 uOUI SI ANA 1 LOUIS I ANA 573 MASSACHUSETTS 2,31h MARYLAND 71,110 MARYLAND A A2 MICHIGAN 3,A72 north CAROLINA 0,21 V MISSOURI 19 new HAMPSHIRE 0 NORTH CAROLINA 3,176 NEW JERSEY 4,324 NER JERSEY 6,0A3 NEW YORK 94 1 NEW YORK 1,656 OHIO 430 OHIO 2,436 PENNSYLVANIA 792 3 ENNSYLVAN I A 7,612 RHODE ISLAND 1 SOUTH CAROLINA 6,557 SOUTH CAROLINA 33 TENNESSEE 31 TENNESSEE 633 TEXAS 0 TEXAS 222 WISCONSIN 9 WEST VIRGINIA 223 total 1D8,525 TOTAL 13,904 source: prepared FOR ERA BY OPRA, INC. (SURVEY SECTION IV DATA. 0L83350) 1/ THE QUANTITIES REPRESENT THE TONS REPORTED BY SHIPPING STATES. TONS SHIPPED HAY INCLUDE STATE-ONLY REGULATED HAZARDOUS RASTE. 3JANTITIIES RECIEVEO BY EACH state NOT REQUESTED. 1985 biennial report STATE PROFI.E FOR T.NE STATE OF VIRGINIA (TA3LE 3 OF 3) ^^ASTE STREAN GENERATION STATE RANKING CO'IPARED TO NATIONA^ RANKING (TOP FIFTY) NATIONAL RANK ^ A S T E CODE OUANTITY GENERATED IN STATE (TONS) state »jaste C3JE rank PERCENT OF state TOTA. 1 0002 24,799,443 1 99.2 1 2 'lOMX 508 18 0.00 3 DOMX 7,829 6 0.03 A 0007 300 19 0.00 5 ^ASTE GENERATED (SEC. lA/IlIB): 2/ ^39,21 RCRA REGULATED TSD FACI.ITIES (SECTION II) facilities MANAGING ONLY ONSITE GENERATED ^ASTE: facilities 'IANAGING only OFFSITE GENERATED WASTE: FACIlITIES managing waste GENERATED BOTH ON AND OFFSITE: TOTAL TSO NUMBER AND PERCENT OF WASTE: PERCEN NU'IBER OF /»AST 38 72.19 5 9,75 15 13.05 53 100 total 3UANTITY OF RCRA REGULATED WASTE MANAGED (SECTION IIA/VI): 5'-*2»07 HANDLING METHOD CODE NUMBER OF FACILITIES USING METHOD (SECTION II) HAZARDOUS ONSITE WASTE QUANTITIES (SECTION V I ) - 3/ OFFSITE handled total CONTAINERS SOI 31 1,177 -( TONS )- 38,A73 39,550 STORAGE TANCTE: DO NOT IlKLi’ZE 'WASTES rPCW aT^F-STATE GSEPAGCFS CN 1^13 P.AGZ. DZSPOSZZZZt: ZF WASTES .TO! ALl D^wTDL'G OTr-CP-STATE GZD^EPATCPS, IS ?£0LT3TEE IN SECTICN V. A. In-state storage, treatonent, or disposal. Enter the quantities of hazardous waste that were generated i.n-State and which -were finally treated or disposed of at in-State facilities or that -were in storage in-State at the close of t'.e repcrtin.g year. See list on page 2 for key to storage, treatnent, and disposal codes. S tcrage: Treatnent; Dispcsa SCI Tons TOl Tors D79 SC2 Tens D80 SO 3 Tons T03 Tons C81 SO 4 Tors T04 Tons 082 SOS Tons D83 - 084 Total: Tors Total: Tors Total; B. Enter the quantity of hazardous waste reported shipped to in~State use, reuse, recycle and/or reclamation facilities, if required of generators fcy State reporting requirements. If unavailable, enter N/A. _ C-8 State SECnCW IV. — DISPCSITICN CF GIUEPAnD HAIAPJXUS WASTES (oDnt.) C. Enter the quantity o£ hazardous waste shipped to out-o£~State facilities, ty individual State. State Cuantitv State sTuantitr>^ _ _ Tens _ _ Tens C-9 State SZCnCN V. — TUTAL CCANTITY CF HAZAFTCUS WASTS TPEATED, STCRED, A^0 DISPCSEi:, BY HANDLING For each handling method, telow, enter the total quantity of regulated haoa waste from all sources that was reported as being treated, stored, or disposed c within tne State by tnat method during the reporting year. PiANDLING hTTHCD TCTAL ?.£?C?TID S borage: 501 - Container (barrel, drum, etc.) . . TCNS 502 TarJc. . 503 Waste Pile. . 504 Surface Inpoundinent. . SC 5 Other. Treatment: TOl Tank . T02 Surface Lttpoundment... TO 3 Incinerator. T04 Ot.her (Use for thermal, biological, Aeriical, or physical treatment not occurring in tanks, surface LiTpcun(±nents, or incinerators.) Disposal: D79 Injection Well. DSC Landfill... C81 Land Application... 062 Ocean Disposal. 083 Surface Inpcundment D84 Other. C-10 -t: CCCE; [Note: .at least ore sr.* ^i-ll ie reciuireo for aa of 15 har.dlir.c rrettccs Haz. Waste cn-aite Nurt«r Quantities off-site Quantities Haz. >::as te on-s i t e Nurtoer Quantities raan.ti C-12 'M- UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS-URBANA