PB89-187652
EPA
530
SW-89
033b
1985 NATIONAL REPORT OF HAZARDOUS WASTE GENERATORS AND TREATMENT,
STORAGE AND DISPOSAL FACILITIES REGULATED UNDER RCRA
1
(U.S.) Environmental Protection Agency
Washington, DC
Mar 89
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Technical Information Service
NTIS.
r
date due
--
—
—
—
—--
EPA
1985 NATIONAL BIEN
• 1
MAL
530
REPORT OF HAZARDOUS
SW-89
WASTE GENERATORS AND
U33b
TREATMENT, STORAGE AND
DISPOSAL FACILITIES
and disposal
-
HWRtC LIBRARY
United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
EPAy530-SW-89-033B
March 1989
VEPA
Office of Solid Waste
Office of Policy, Planning,
and Information
Washington, DC 20460
Solid Waste
1985 National Report of
Hazardous Waste Generators
and Treatment, Storage and
Disposal Facilities Regulated
Under RCRA
Volume II: Methodology and Data
REPRODUCED BY
U.S. DEPARTMENTOF COMMERCE
NATIONAL TECHNICAL
INFORMATION SERVICE
SPRINGFIELD. VA 22161
, I •?" •• ». > •' I '^T I
< ' ~ ^ Sxr
jI■. ^ • * - ~
.'4 J
■'
. •• " •:• ■ •■ &,;9^irlL,... ..i
r - k
- ■>
V
, V‘ ■ j *t,v.--'-
'li^
i if
■ ^iif •■
i^:
, V -
%
t'
'r.rr
M
^£d!
PREFACE
This report was prepared under the direction of the Office of Solid Waste, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) by DPRA Incorporated. The study’s
report is divided into two volumes:
"1985 National Biermial Report of Hazardous Waste Generators
and Treatment, Storage and Disposal Facilities Regulated Under
RCRA" (December 1988)
Volume I: Summary
Volume El: Methodology and Data
The Summary report overviews national, regional and limited state-by-state
analyses of the generator and facility data that were provided by the states (and
territories) in their "State Biennial Program Reports" for 1985 or alternate
reporting formats. The Methodology and Data report provides a more detailed
assessment of the study’s survey approach and data, particularly state-by-state
data profiles and relationships among the states. The computer data base
utilized in the study comprises the EPA 1985 Bienitial Report SAS Data Library
located at EPA’s National Computing Center, Research Triangle Park, NC.
Although each state’s hazardous waste generation and management data are
profiled in this report, it focuses on regional and national level analyses.
Historically, it has been difficult to obtain uniform and consistent data among ail
the states; the "1985 Biennial Report" provides more comprehensive and
improved data over earlier 1981 and 1983 studies. Additional needed
improvements are recognized and being addressed in EPA’s planning effons.
Overall, however, the 1985 Biennial Report is regarded by EPA as a benchmark
for future comparative analyses of hazardous waste generation and management
data.
u
-ffc-
• I (
XH'j..
Digitized by the Internet Archive
in 2019 with funding from
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign Alternates
https://archive.org/details/1985nationalbien00unse
CONTENTS
Page
PREFACE u
LIST OF TABLES iv
UST OF FIGURES vii
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS viii
SELECTED DEFINITIONS viii
l. INTRODUCTION I-l
A. Purpose I-1
B. Generators and TSD Facilities 1-3
C. Hazardous Waste Categories 1-6
D. Report Organization 1-8
n. METHODOLOGY B-l
A. Previous Reporting Efforts II-l
B. Reponed Data Codes n-2
C. Repotted Data Variations 11-3
D. Data Editing Procedures n-5
m. NATIONAL SUMMARY RESULTS HI-l
A. Generators HI-l
B. TSD Facilities ni-8
C. Hazardous Waste Generation 10-16
D. Hazardous Waste Disposition 10-19
E. Quantity of Hazardous Waste Managed by Handling Method 10-22
F. Comparison With Other Studies 10-40
G. Quality Assurance Procedures 10-41
rV. STATE AND TERRITORY SUMMARY PROFILES IV-1
A. State-by-State Comparisons FV-l
B. State and Territory Summary Profiles rV-4
REFERENCES
APPENDIX A. 1985 STATE BIENNIAL REPORT DATA COMPARISONS
APPENDIX B. U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
HAZARDOUS WASTE REPORT FORMS FOR 1985
APPENDIX C. STATE BIENNIAL PROGRAM REPORT FOR 1985
I
LIST OF TABLES
Page
Table IH-l. Number of Large Hazardous Waste Generators and
Total Hazardous Waste Quantity Generated by EPA
Region, 1985 111-2
Table 111-2. Number of Large Hazardous Waste Generators and
Total Hazardous Waste Quantity Generated by
State, 1985 III-4
Table 111-3. Leading Hazardous Waste Generating States and Their
Hazardous Waste Quantities Generated, 1985 III-5
Table 111-4. Number of Hazardous Waste Treatment, Storage and
Disposal (TSD) Facilities and Quantity of Hazardous
Waste Managed by EPA Region, 1985 HI-10
Table III-5. Number of Hazardous Waste Treatment, Storage and
Disposal (TSD) Facilities and (^antity of Hazardous
Waste Managed by State, 1985 111-13
Table 111-6. Number of Hazardous Waste Treatment, Storage, and
Disposal Facilities Reporting the Use of Each
Handling Method by Region, 1985 111-15
Table IQ-?. Rank-Ordered Listing of the Largest 25 U.S.
Hazardous Waste Streams Generated in 1985 111-18
Table 111-8. Hazardous Waste Shipped Out-of-State and Reported
Destination of Shipments by State, 1985 111-21
Table in-9. Quantity of Hazardous Waste Treated, Stored and
Dispos^ by Handling Method and by Region, 1985 111-23
Table lU-lO. Quantities of Hazardous Waste Managed Using the
Container Storage (SOI) Handling Method by Waste
Group, 1985 111-24
Table Hl-ll. Quantities of Hazardous Waste Managed Using the
Tank Storage (S02) Handling Method by Waste Group,
1985 in-25
IV
LIST OF TABLES (Continued)
Table 01-12.
Table 10-13.
Table 10-14.
Table 01-15.
Table 01-16.
Table 01-17.
Table 01-18.
Table 01-19.
Table 01-20.
Table 01-21.
Table 01-22.
Quantities of Hazardous Waste Managed Using the
Waste Pile Storage (S03) Handling Method by
Waste Group, 1985
Quantities of Hazardous Waste Managed Using the
Surface Impoundment Storage (S04) Handling
Method by Waste Group, 1985
Quantities of Hazardous Waste Managed Using the
Other Storage (S05) Handling Method by Waste
Group, 1985
Quantities of Hazardous Waste Managed Using the
Tank Treatment (TOl) Handling Method by Waste
Group, 1985
Quantities of Hazardous Waste Managed Using the
Surface Impoundment Treatment (T02) Handling
Method by Waste Group, 1985
Quantities of Hazardous Waste Managed Using the
Incinerator Treatment (T03) Handling Method by
Waste Group, 1985
Quantities of Hazardous Waste Managed Using the
Other Treatments (T04) Handling Method by Waste
Group, 1985
Quantities of Hazardous Waste Managed Using the
Injection Well Disposal (D79) Handling Method
by Waste Group, 1985
Quantities of Hazardous Waste Managed Using the
Landfill Disposal (D80) Handling Method by
Waste Group, 1985
Quantities of Hazardous Waste Managed Using the
Land Treatment Disposal (D81) Handling Method
by Waste Group, 1985
Quantities of Hazardous Waste Managed Using the
Surface Impoundment Disposal (D83) Handling
Method by Waste Group, 1985
P.agg
m -26
in-27
m -28
in-29
in-30
m-31
m-32
in-33
in-34
in-35
in-36
LIST OF TABLES (Continued)
Table 111-23. Quantities of Hazardous Waste Managed Using the
Other Disposals (D84) Handling Method by Waste
Group, 1985
Table in-24.
Quantities of Hazardous Waste Managed Using the
Recycle (ROl) Handling Method by Waste Group,
1985
Table 111-25. Quantities of Hazardous Waste Managed Using All
Handling Methods by Waste Group, 1985
Table FV-l. Rank Ordering of States Based on the Quantity of
RCRA-Regulated Hazardous Waste Generated and
the Corresponding Number of RCRA and State-
Regulated Generators in 1985
Table rV-2. Rank Ordering of States Based on the (Quantity of
RCRA-Regulated Hazardous Waste Managed and the
Corresponding Number of RCRA and State-
Regulated TSD Facilities in 1985
Page
in-37
in-38
in-39
IV-2
IV-3
VI
LIST OF FIGURES
Page
Figure I-l. U.S. EPA Regions and Region-State Designations 1-2
Figure 1-2. Biennial Reporting Requirements for Generators of
Hazardous Waste 1-4
Figure 1-3. Biennial Reporting Requirements for Treatment,
Storage and Disposal Facilities Which Manage RCRA-
Regulated Hazardous Waste 1-5
Figure EI-l. Schematic of the 1985 Biennial Report Data System 11-8
Figure 11-2. Structure Chart for the 1985 National Biennial Report
SAS Data Library EH-10
Figure III-l. Amount of Hazardous Waste Generated by EPA
Region, 1985 111-6
Figure in-2. Hazardous Waste Generated in the U.S. By State,
1985 m-7
Figure in-3. Cumulative Percentage of Hazardous Waste
Generated in the U.S., 1985 10-9
Figure 111-4. Amount of Hazardous Waste Managed by EPA
Region, 1985 EQ-12
Figure in-5. Hazardous Waste Managed in the U.S. by State,
1985 ni-14
Figure in-6. Relative Amount of Hazardous Waste Managed in
Onsite and Offsite Facilities, 1985 111-17
Figure EEI-7. Leading Hazardous Wastes in the U.S. by EPA
Waste Code, 1985 m-20
Figure in-8. Overview of Data Concerns With the 1985 Biennial
Report in-43
Figure 0-9. Illustration of the Mass Balance Concept for
Hazardous Waste 0-44
Figure EV-l. Illustration of 1985 Biennial Report State
Profile Tables rV-5
vii
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS
BR
CFR
CMA
DL
biennial report
Code of Federal Regulations
Chemical Manufacturers Association
data library
EP
EPA
GAO
HSWA
extraction procedure (EP toxic waste)
Environmental Protection Agency
General Accounting Office
Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (of 1984)
HW
HWDMS
LQG
NCC
hazardous waste
hazardous waste data management system
large quantity generator
National Computing Center (EPA’s North Carolina
facility at Research Triangle Park)
OSW
OTA
QA/QC
RCRA
Office of Solid Waste
Office of Technology Assessment
quality assurance/quality control
Resource Conservation and Recovery Act
SAS
SIC
SQG
TSD
TSDR
Statistical Analysis System
Standard Indusffial Qassification
small quantity generator
treatment, storage, and disposal
treatment, storage, disposal, and recycle
SELECTED DEFINITIONS
Reyulated Waste Includes hazardous wastes regulated under Federal and state stamtes by large quantity
Generated : generators and some small quantity generators (SQGs) where states regulate SQGs
RC31A Regulated Includes RCRA listed and characteristic wastes, exclusive of state regulated hazardous
Waste Generated : waste
Reyiilated Wa.ste Includes hazardous wastes managed by all RCRA and state-regulated TSD facilities.
Managed :
RCRA Rggilatcd
W aste Managed:
Includes RCRA listed and characteristic wastes managed at on-site and off-site
facilities. Wastes management units included:
• Storage (SOI to S04)
- Containers
- Tanks
- Waste Piles
- Surface Impoundments
• Treatment (TOl to T04)
- Tanks
- Surface Impoundments
- Incinerators
- Other
• Disposal (D79 to D84)
- Injection Wells
- Landfills
- Land Treatment
- 0:ean
- SurffK:e Impoundments
- Oher
• Recycling (ROl)
vm
1985 NATIONAL BIENNIAL REPORT OF HAZARDOUS WASTE
GENERATORS AND TREATMENT, STORAGE AND DISPOSAL
FACILITIES REGULATED UNDER RCRA
VOLUME II: METHODOLOGY AND DATA
I. INTRODUCTION
This Volume II report surmarizes the data gathered by the Environmental
Protection Agency for the 1985 biennial report on RCRA-regulated hazardous
waste generation and management activities. This introductory chapter
briefly describes the purpose of the study, the generators of hazardous
waste, the facilities that manage these wastes, and the hazardous waste
streams and handling methods utilized by facilities.
A. Purpose
Effective management of the nation's hazardous wastes requires that
Congress, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, and state environmental
offices have and maintain responsible and accurate information regarding
the generation, handling, storage, and ultimate disposal of those wastes.
Providing that information is the function of this 1985 biennial report on
the U.S. RCRA-regulated hazardous waste system. The study reports such
data for each of the fifty states and three territories which comprise
ERA'S ten regions in Figure I-l.
Previous studies have proved insufficient for such a purpose (see Section
II.A) and though the present study has weaknesses, the information
assembled does provide EPA with a profile of the RCRA-regulated hazardous
waste community. The data offer the most comprehensive national summary
view yet of (1) the number of RCRA-regulated hazardous waste generators and
the kinds and quantities of their generated wastes and (2) the number of
treatment, storage, and disposal (TSD) facilities and the kinds and
quantities of wastes they manage.
I-l
FIGURE I-l. U.S. ERA REGIONS AND REGION-STATE DESIGNATIONS
Region-State Designations
4 Alabama
10 Alaska
9 Arizona
6 Arkansas
9 California
8 Colorado
1 Connecticut
3 Delaware
3 District of Columbia
4 Florida
4 Georgia
9 Hawaii
10 Idaho
5 niinois
5 Indiana
7 Iowa
7 Kansas
4 Kentucky
6 Louisiana
1 Maine
3 Maryland
1 Mas^husetts
5 Michigan
5 Minnooca
4 Mississippi
6 Missoun
8 Montana
7 Nebraska
9 Nevada
1 New Hampshire
2 New Jersey
6 New Mexico
2 New York
4 North Carolina
8 North Dakota
5 Ohio
6 Oklahoma
10 Oregon
3 Pennsylvania
1 Rhode Island
4 South Carolina
8 South Dakota
4 Tennessee
6 Texas
8 Utah
1 Vermont
3 Virginia
10 Washington
3 West Virginia
5 Wisconsin
8 Wyoming
9 American Samoa
9 Guam
2 Puerto Rico
2 Virgin Islands
Source: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
1-2
B. Generators and TSD Facilities
Under the procedures developed for this study, RCRA-regulated hazardous
waste generators and TSD facilities completed and submitted data forms to
state and ERA offices describing their waste management practices. The
data from these forms were entered into specific State Summary formats and
forwarded to ERA for processing and incorporation into the present study.
However, an understanding of this study's data involves an awareness both
of those facilities that were required to report and of those that were
exempt.
Figures 1-2 and 1-3 show in detail those factors that characterized the
reporting facilities and by implication the rationale for including them
(or exempting them) in this biennial report. However, a less detailed
narrative explanation follows that outlines the generators and TSD
facilities affected.
The management of hazardous wastes varies among the states. ERA
administers the uniform RCRA program in states not authorized to conduct an
ERA-approved regulatory program; authorized states conduct their own
RCRA-required program. In some cases, their regulatory requirements are
different and more stringent than the Federal government's, a condition
that results in those states controlling a broader range of wastes,
generators, and TSD facilities than would be the case if ERA administered
the program. This study required that sites (i.e., generators and TSD
facilities) subject to both federal and state administered requirements
file waste system reports that would reflect their 1985 activities. Sites
that were classified as generators within the Hazardous Waste Data
Management System (HWDMS) were required to file Form 8700-13A, "U.S.
Environmental Rrotection Agency Hazardous Waste Generator Report for 1985"
(see Appendix B) or an approved alternate form that involves 1985 waste
generation activities. Those facilities which treated, stored, or disposed
of RCRA-regulated hazardous wastes during any part of 1985 filed Form
8700-13B, "U.S. Environmental Rrotection Agency Hazardous Waste Treatment,
1-3
FIGURE 1-2. BIENNIAL REPORTING REQUIREMENTS FOR GENERATORS
OF HAZARDOUS WASTE
"^/oe of 3usmess/Activity
Required Sufcttnssions
"d this sue suomit a Notii'ication of Hazardous Waste
ctivifies Form (ERA Form 3700-12) and indicate large
uantity generator status?
'ies
:i
Id ttie ousiness generate any quantity of RCRA
naracteristic or listed hazardous wastes during
985?
■^es
ere all wastes generated during 1985 exemoted from the
CRA '-egulations, because they eUher were not solid
astes as defined in 40 CFR 261.2, not hazardous waste
s defined in 40 CFR 261,3, delisted onor to January !,■
?85. or were excluded under 40 CFR 261.4 or 40 CFR
52.51?
No
i
Id the business generate during any calendar month,
r accumulate at any time, a total of at least;
L) 1,C00 kilograms of hazardous waste; or
2) one xilogram of acute hazardous wastes listed in
40 CFR 261.31, 261.32 or 261.33(e); or
3) 100 kilograms of any residue or contaminated soil,
of a soill, into or on any land or water, of any
acute hazardous wastes listed in 40 CFR 261,31,
261.32 or 261.33(e)?
■'es
?'•? all wastes generated during 1985 exemoted from
egulations because the material will be beneficially
sed, reused, recycled or reclaimed?
No
i.
Id the business store for less than 90 cays and ship
'■^-site all of the hazardous wastes it generated
unng I95Fwi thout treatment or disposal?
No
X
Id this sue use only treatment, storage, and
isoosal techniques which are exempt from the RCRA
egulations?
No
Assumed not reouireq to suomi
Biennial Report.
NO
No
'es
No
The business did not generate
regulated quantities of Hazardous
waste during 1985, but must still
suomit page one of the Generator
Biennial Hazardous Waste Report
(ERA Form 8700-13A or the
authorized state equivalent) m
order to certify Non-Regulated
Status under one of the following
status codes:
9 -- Out of Business
1 -- Non-Handler
4 -- Exempt
2 -- Small Quantity Generator
5 — Beneficial Jse
'es
The business generated regulated
quantities of hazardous waste
during 1985, and must submit a
completed Generator Biennial
Hazardous Waste Report (ERA Form
3700-13A or the equivalent State
developed form in an autnonred
State).
^es
l£l
The business treated, stored or
disposed of hazardous waste
during 1985, and must submit a
completed Facility (TSD) Biennial
Hazardous Waste Report (ERA Form
3700-13B or the equivalent
State developed form in an
authorized State) and a Generator
Biennial Hazardous waste Report
(ERA Form 3700-13A or the
equivalent State developed form
in an authorized State).
1-4
FIGURE 1-3. BIENNIAL REPORTING REQUIREMENTS FOR TREATMENT,
STORAGE AND DISPOSAL FACILITIES WHICH MANAGE
RCRA-REGULATED HAZARDOUS WASTE
*yoe of Business Facility
Pequirgd Submissions
1-5
storage and Disposal Facility Report for 1985" (see Appendix B) or an
approved alternate form in order to report those activities. To assure the
completeness of data, facilities whose activities were characteristic of
both generators and TSDs filed both reports. Sites of either type or a
combination of both types, who filed state-EPA designed reports, had the
data on their RCRA-regulated hazardous waste activities summarized for this
report. In essence, then, and as Figures 1-2 and 1-3 show, the data
designed for the study reflect a comprehensive view of nearly all
activities dealing with the generation and treatment of RCRA-regulated
hazardous wastes in the United States.
Data filing requirements were comprehensive. For example, sites that were
listed within the HWDMS but that had ceased operations reported that status
(as well as any minimal activities they may have carried out in 1985).
Facilities operating under interim status RCRA standards indicated their
practices, also.
An exception to the reporting requirements was the "small quantity
generator" which was defined in 1985 as a generator accounting for no more
than 1,000 kilograms per month (or 13.2 tons per year) of hazardous waste
over the entire survey year. These generators were given a non-regulated
status (see Figure 1-2 for a full description of this exception.) Many
such generators exist, but their cumulative hazardous waste contribution to
the national aggregate is relatively minor.
C. Hazardous Waste Categories
The reporting procedures for the Biennial Report required that generators
and TSD facilities provide data on those wastes that are defined as
hazardous by 40 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 261.3, i.e. primarily
those wastes that either exhibit a characteristic of a hazardous waste as
defined in Parts 261.20 through 261.24 or are listed in Parts 261.31
through 261.33. Specific wastes which were not included are: (1) those
generated by "small quantity generators" as defined in 40 CFR 261.5; (2)
1-6
excluded under 40 CFR Part 261.4 or under the beneficial use exemption of
Part 261.6; (3) delisted prior to January 1, 1985; (4) deemed hazardous
only by state regulations (e.g., PCBs, asbestos, waste oil); (5) exempted
under Part 261.51; or (6) not meeting the definitions of a solid or
hazardous waste (Parts 261.2 and 261.3, respectively).
The specific hazardous wastes included in the CFR regulations are numerous
-- too numerous to allow a manageable, accurate census report from as many
generators and ISO facilities and as many administrative agencies as were
covered by this report. In order to make reporting a manageable task and
to lessen reporting and summarizing inaccuracies, the reportable waste
types and quantities were grouped as follows:
0 D001--Ignitable waste,
0 D002--Corrosive waste,
0 D003--Reactive waste,
0 D004-D017--E. P. Toxic wastes,
0 F001-F005—Spent halogenated and non-halogenated solvents from
non-specific sources,
0 F006-F028--Electroplating and coating wastewater treatment
sludges and cyanide-bearing bath solutions and sludges from
non-specific sources,
0 K001-K106—Listed industry wastes from specific sources,
0 P001-P123--Acutely hazardous commercial chemical products,
manufacturing chemical intermediates, or off-specification
commercial chemical products or manufacturing chemical
intermediates, and
1-7
0 U001-U249--Toxic commercial chemical products, manufacturing
intermediates or off-specification commercial chemical products
or manufacturing intermediates.
Generators and TSD facilities that handled wastes in multiple categories
were to use waste mixture codes to report their data as follows:
0 DOMX--Mixtures of all "D" wastes,
0 FOMX--Mixtures of all "F" wastes,
0 KOMX--Mixtures of all "K" wastes,
0 • POMX--Mixtures of all "P" wastes,
0 UOMX--Mixtures of all "U," and
0 MOMX--Mixtures of multiple waste types (e.g., mixtures of "D" and
"F" wastes, "P" and "K" wastes, RCRA-regulated and solely
state-regulated wastes, multiple state-regulated wastes, etc.).
The 1984 Congressional stipulations for the biennial reporting of hazardous
waste generation and management activities also required generators to
report on their efforts to minimize the volume and toxicity of their
generated wastes. The changes achieved through these efforts were to be
compared with the performance of previous years. However, those
compilations are not included in this EPA report.
D. Report Organization
Chapters II through IV comprise the remainder of this Volume II Report.
Chapter II describes the study's methodology. Chapter III presents a
series of national aggregate summary tables and a brief analysis of each.
Chapter IV contains the individual states and territories' 1985 biennial
report profile data (3 pages per state). Chapter IV also includes
comparative summaries of selected generator and TSD facility data for all
states. Following Chapter IV, Appendix A summarizes key hazardous waste
generator and TSD facility data from the 1985 Biennial Report survey forms.
1-8
Appendix B contains examples of the generator and TSD facility forms used
to gather the study's primary data. Appendix C contains EPA's "State
Biennial Program Report" for the 1985 biennial report.
K
!
'SO wo^tvfts tft *>u»:'‘p!® catswir^^-ii
*ier< w:t >j5:e nutur; Cv ^ Mtjrtvra? of ill ^v' ws t*#!
0 PnMl.-Hixtt.r«J of an *‘P ^istis,
0 Oi>*X—KiAt«r#i af »1i "U,”'n«< * '■
0 *}» Hhil t^pU wi t;,y‘i -j., tn!*tij>4i;. ^0*' A'vd
“?'* Ki', n- <^Ct< tfiquUt^a 4
U4te-r€?'jUud Twitlpl^ tuU*r«^U^o
t
The 19S4 tA* bt^^n-nl^l c?
fetr diT« 5:tiv' »t iHo i^r.r-rntofi to
,’-£|.'>r‘ ^ 'hfiif efforts tc Wtniniuif :<■> . .v»jk inif tojcinty of ?:f>e1t ^
9t»>«r§f/« wi-*..#t, ’^Ue ch^ »9e$ itf f*rij tpre-^ efforts nte»**o»r7»jfrn't f i>re r ’ju< ye-irt. thflv*
cc?rj;lte-i♦ ons ^.re net 'nciud^'-i ' *' *■ i^'^Hreper?. _ ■ ;• ^*4
0 . ^ *Jort * 3 r 4111 * 111 ) o n
% I
(I '•Vircoph If ccri>cri5€ tN ''cWiMJer of thtS' !! vfcort*
'oiptjr “ 4 isc lOei th# steady^-etnodolo^y. CMOter ni a
^irt^s fli’ ne-iandl »oi r*fy^ »bfc,i> ^^
* ' S'Mmvamw -v-w —-•
,;ftoq^ii »^n?lb?8 fc»fJ n'¥^0S^JnBvz ’ ^tortf*
7a
>'M?L.*'ilitC-4«- j»«JLl^*Jt3ri>t *' - » t '7 tvft'.i xr.tH
V‘ ■'
*2g*5£« ■»♦**»« '0 .'"'I'lnuisa tie
IfK?^
^:^uo^s b«xt?»rt&io tet^
wTT^pfq jfi plf^ uotgyi^ n/fa
bwoqotq oJ b^tioJ’zuboa s^aod^i oS^
etoo ff! hf fsK n9t9 9fiJ ’to nctirov
wtl rtf t^noJtf^noa
lUpS^Ti/f frftofn-i %0 2s;s.t^, % •fOrtiOOfc ftow
1 « # • * t ^
i-ij td
♦ott I^nvtMX
fou 70IWK9 nf
. L.
■•■ ■*
iilf’
S^JUrCtl 1-t.^v f*
4
iCii -voti t’fuR ^c^rr.y br WMU. ^
m
';*i«
IV. STATE AND TERRITORY SUMMARY PROFILES
This chapter first presents selected state data comparisons for both
hazardous waste generation and management. The comparisons highlight the
top-ranked states for the chosen variables.
Second, the chapter contains a separate summary profile of hazardous waste
generation and management for each state and territory. The summary
profile consists of a three-page summary of data submitted by the state for
the 1985 Biennial Report. (Although the state data have been edited and
revised in some cases, data inconsistencies remain for some states.
Apparent data discrepancies could not be feasibly resolved within the
study's scope. Rather, improved plans for conducting subsequent Biennial
Reports have been established.)
A. State-by-$tate Comparisons
Table IV-1 lists all states and territories in their rank order of the
total quantity of hazardous waste generated in 1985. The quantities shown
are predominantly RCRA-regulated hazardous wastes, but 1 percent or less of
state-only regulated wastes are included in the national total. 1/ Also
reported in Table IV-1 is the number of generators reported by each state
in 1985. As can be seen, the rank ordering of the states according to the
number of generators is not equal to the rank-ordering according to the
quantities shown. However, there is a strong correlation as expected.
Table IV-2 presents a rank-ordering of all states according to the quantity
of hazardous waste managed in 1985. This listing is similar to the state
y The larger of Survey Section I or III data is reported (see Appendix
A). Section I includes both RCRA and state-only regulated hazardous
wastes if applicable. Only the following states have over one percent
state-only regulated wastes: MA, WA, VT, ME, MN, MO, RI, and CA.
IV-1
TABLE IV-1 RANK ORDERING OF STATES BASED ON THE QUANTITY OF RCRA-REGULATED HAZARDOUS WASTE GENERATED
and THE'CORRESPONDING NUMBER OF RCRA AND STATE-REGULATED GENERATORS IN 1985
1985 RCRA-
requlated hazardous waste 1/
RCRA
regulated
and State-
generators 2/
Rank
State
Quantity F*ercent
Numoer
Percent
(000 tons)
1
Texas
38,767.6
14.30
2,450
11.27
2
Georgia
37.324.8
13.77
330
1.52
3
Tennessee
33,199.0
12.25
556
2.56
4
Pennsylvania
31,307.2
11.55
2,607
11.99
5
Virginia
24,995.5
9.22
532
2.45
6
New York
15.969.2
5.89
652
3.00
7
Louisiana
13.672.1
5.04
302
1.39
8
West Virginia
12.077.1
4.46
57
0.26
9
California
9.657.8
3.56
3,972
18.27
10
New Jersey
8,999.5
3.32
1,480
6.81
11
Kentucky
7.661.9
2.83
187
0.86
12
Alabama
7,406.2
2.73
217
1.00
13
South Carolina
5,300.8
1.96
171
0.79
14
Michigan
4,076.9
1.50
542
2.49
15
Ohio
2,986.3
1.10
688
3.16
16
Indiana
2,517.9
0.93
395
1.82
17
Mississippi
2,507.5
0.93
109
0.50
18
Illinois
2,141.4
0.79
760
3.50
19
Oklahoma
1,591.2
0.59
118
0.54
20
Kansas
1,324.7
0.49
131
0.60
21
North Carolina
1,285.3
0.47
384
1.77
22
Utah
1,134.8
0.42
220
1.01
23
Arizona
846.7
0.31
160
0.74
24
Florida
833.7
0.31
273
1.26
25
Maryland
698.3
0.26
206
0.95
26
Nebraska
543.4
0.20
65
0.30
27
Washington
439.2
0.16
188
0.86
28
Minnesota
328.6
0.12
291
1.34
29
Colorado
295.0
0.11
90
0.41
30
Connecticut
178.0
0.07
376
1.73
31
Puerto Rico
149.0
0.05
115
0.53
32
Wisconsin
123.4
0.05
240
1.10
33
Iowa
120.8
0.04
123
0.57
34
Massachusetts
114.4
0.04
1,013
4.66
35
Nevada
94.8
0.03
34
0.16
36
Delaware
94.5
0.03
25
0.11
37
Missouri
68.1
0.03
191
0.88
38
Arkansas
57.2
0.02
114
0.52
39
Oregon
30.8
0.01
505
2.32
40
Montana
25.2
0.01
17
0.08
41
New Hampshire
19.9
0.01
102
0.47
42
Wyoming
19.8
0.01
•14
0.06
43
Rhode Island
11.6
0.00 3/
403
1.85
44
Vermont
9.8
0.00 "
124
0.57
45
New Mexico
8.8
0.00
56
0.26
46
HmII
7.3
0.00
26
0.12
47
MtffW
7.1
0.00
69
0.32
48
PiDrtfi Dakota
3.2
0.00
8
0.04
49
Alaska
2.6
0.00
9
0.04
50
Idaho
2.0
0.00
24
0.11
51
District of Columbia
1.9
0.00
6
0.03
52
South Dakota
0.9
0.00
9
0.04
53
Guam
0.4
0.00
4
0.02
TOTAL*
271,037.3
100.00
21,740
100.00
* Hay not add due to rounding.
y Some states exempt hazardous wastewater following treatment from further regulation (if nonhazardous)
while other states do not exempt such wastewater. Consequently, the rank ordering of states could vary
if the exemption procedure were constant.
2/ Number of large quantity generators, i.e., over 13.2 tons annually, plus generators with unreported
quantities (zeros or blanks). See Appendix A.
3/ 0.00 indicates less then 0.01.
Source: Prepared by DPRA from the 1985 Biennial Report SAS Data Library. (Survey Sections I and III data.
0L88350)
IV-2
TABLE IV-2 RANK ORDERING OF STATES BASED ON THE QUANTITY OF RCRA-RE6ULATED HAZARDOUS HASTE MANAGED
AND THE CORRESPONDING HUMBER OF RCRA AND STATE-REGULATED TSD FACILITIES IN 1985
1985 RCRA-
regulated hazardous waste 1/
RCRA and
regulated TSD
State-
fad 1 1 ties
Rank
State
Quantity Percent
Number
Percent
(000 tons)
1
Texas
41,426.2
17.42
1,153
23.32
2
Georgia
37,318.5
15.69
91
1.84
3
Pennsylvania
31,179.3
14.11
464
9.39
4
Virginia
24,970.7
10.50
67
1.36
5
Louisiana
14,699.8
6.18
67
1.36
6
West Virginia
12,044.9
5.06
39
0.79
7
New York
10,219.6
4.30
132
2.67
8
New Jersey
8,985.9
3.78
284
5.75
9
Kentucky
8,245.8
3.47
44
0.89
10
Alabama
7,593.0
3.19
66
1.33
11
Michigan
5,536.7
2.33
126
2.55
12
South Carolina
5,292.7
2.22
83
1.68
13
Utah
4,777.7
2.01
39
0.79
14
Ohio
3,851.8
1.62
251
5.08
15
California
3,734.3
1.57
348
7.04
16
Mississippi
2,449.3
1.03
47
0.95
17
Illinois
2,355.6
0.99
295
5.97
18
Oklahoma
2,171.9
0.91
46
0.93
19
Indiana
1,873.4
0.79
133
2.69
20
North Carolina
1,416.3
0.60
78
1.58
21
Kansas
1,324.6
0.56
35
0.71
22
Arizona
920.0
0.39
98
1.98
23
Tennessee
915.5
0.38
50
1.01
24
Arkansas
724.3
0.30
35
0.71
25
Florida
723.3
0.30
72
1.46
26
Washington
642.9
0.27
60
1.21
27
Maryland
601.9
0.25
44
0.89
28
Massachusetts
541.8
0.23
52
1.05
29
Colorado
279.9
0.12
34
0.69
30
Connecticut
174.2
0.07
138
2.79
31
Puerto Rico
129.7
0.05
54
1.09
32
Wisconsin
105.4
0.04
70
1.42
33
Nevada
96.9
0.04
8
0.16
34
Iowa
94.9
0.04
46
0.93
35
Minnesota
94.9
0.04
41
0.83
36
North Dakota
84.7
0.04
7
0.14
37
Rhode Island
67.4
0.03
13
0.26
38
Wyoming
66.0
0.03
11
0.22
39
Missouri
34.1
0.01
96
1.94
40
Oregon
28.6
0.01
13
0.26
41
Delaware
27.3
0.01
15
0.30
42
Montana
24.8
0.01
9
0.18
43
New Mexico
7.4
0.0 2/
16
0.32
44
Hawaii
6.2
0.00 "
12
0.24
45
Nebraska
5.0
0.00
8
0.16
46
Idaho
4.3
0.00
11
0.22
47
Naino
2.6
0.00
17
0.34
48
Alaska
1.3
0.00
5
0.10
49
Varaont
0.8
0.00
7
0.14
50
New Hampshire
0.7
0.00
9
0.18
51
Guam
0.3
0.00
2
0.04
52
South Dakota
0.0
0.00
2
0.04
53
District of Columbia
0.0
0.00
1
0.02
TOTAL*
237,875.3
100.00
4,944
100.00
* May not add due to rounding.
y Some states exempt hazardous wastewater following treatment from further regulation (if nonhazardous)
“ while other states do not exempt such wastewater. Consequently, the rank ordering of states could vary
if the exemption procedure were constant.
2/ 0.0 indicates less than 1,000 tons; 0.00 indicates less than 0.01.
Source: Prepared by OPRA from the 1985 Biennial Report SAS Data Library. (Survey Sections II and VI data.
0L88350)
IV-3
rankings for generation with the main higher-ranked management states being
New York and Illinois. Overall, there is a high correlation in the ranking
of states by generation and management, largely because most industrial
wastes are managed by onsite ISO facilities. Thus, most states manage
approximately the same quantities as they generate.
B. State and Territory Sumnary Profiles
Each state profile consists of a three-page summary as illustrated in
Figure IV-1. The contents of each page are outlined briefly here and the
profiles follow for each state in alphabetical order.
1. Generator, TSD and Handling Method Data
Each state's biennial report profile first contains the following summary
data for generators and TSD facilities in the state:
0 Total number of RCRA regulated large quantity generators
0 Total quantity of regulated (RCRA and State) waste generated
0 Total number of RCRA regulated TSD facilities
number managing only onsite generated waste
number managing only offsite generated waste
number managing waste generated both onsite and offsite
0 Total quantity of RCRA regulated waste managed
0 Disposition of waste (onsite and offsite) by handling method
The figures for the total number of RCRA and state-regulated generators
were obtained from the list of generators attached to each state's Biennial
Program Report as required by the instructions in Section I of that report.
The total quantity of regulated waste generated was obtained from either
Section I or Section III of the 1985 State Biennial Program Report
(Appendix C) -- whichever is larger. The rationale for this approach is
that missing data exist in Sections I and III, but not in both. By
IV-4 ■
FIGURE IV-1. ILLUSTRATION OF 1985 BIENNIAL REPORT STATE
PROFILE TABLES
!«•) SliHMUl. IIRMT sr4rf RlO^Uf F3I THi STATi OF <4iHMCrO«
IT*tLf J OF II
MASTf sTt|4M sr«rf •4«ii«c commio to matiomi. (awim iroF fifiti
••ATI0M4C
tAM
FASTI
COOf
ouAMfirf odcftarco
IN srari itonsi
STArc AAsri
COOf tANA
fItCfNT Of
srAfi total
1
0002
AT.AOI
1
10.01
1
Nona
OltOOl
2
lA.lT
1
ooai
IAO.919
1
AInOO
A
SOOT
*10
10
0.11
5
com
l.S«l
il
OnAI
4
^001
SOI
10
O.Of
7
OOOl
ISA
11
0.01
i«s> iiiMiAL AfFoar sTArt FioFitt Fot nia stati of masni«ct(h
IIAOLi i OF II
total auAvTITT OF MATAUOUS FAtTf
(IFOOTIO SNIFFCO OUT OF JTAII
If IF DOTS 11
total OUAMTITT of iMlAttOm hasti
AIFO tTIO TMIFFfO FfOn OTNfO STATU
• lAFOOTSII 1/
MCI IT Iff
STATI
AMAMAS
AOIIORA
CALIFOMIA
colooaoo
Toas
SMIFFfO
A*
AA
A.UI
I
STATU SalFFiaC
TO aASMiacTOa
ALAtIA
CALIFOMIA
COLOOAOO
aAfAlt
TOM
SNIFFfO
t«f« tIiaalAL IIFOOT stati FfOFILf FOf THf STATI OF MASNIOCTOO
ITAOLf 1 OF II
TOTAL aUMOia OF fCfA UtULATIO LAACi SINIfATOIS ISICTION
fCOA flfULATIO TSO FACILITIU ISICTION III
FACILITIU AAaAllaC OOLT OMIT! IIBflATIO AASTII
FACILITIU lANACIaO ONLT OFFSITI CINflATCO MASTII
FACILITIU AANACIaC IASTI WMIATIO IOTN OM ANO 01
total TSO aUOOII ANO FIICINT OF lASTII
total OUANTITT of ICIA IICWLATIO IASTI NANAIIO ISICTIOO UA/TIII
lAII 1/
101
lA/llllll 1/
FIICINT
auNOfO
OF FASTI
SO
Tl.l* t
*
A.IS t
Til 1*
10.0* S
*0
ION S
lA/TIII
*AI.OT«
NMOL INI IITNOO
cool
NMOII OF
FACILITIU
USIM aiTNOO
ISKTIOa III
NA1A0OHS FASTI WAMTITIIS NAaOLIO
ISICTION Til 1/
OATA. ILIIMOI
M statu. TONS SNIFFM
lAWTITIU IICIITIO IT
ONSITI
OFFSITI
TOTAL
->ITOHSI>
CONTAiailS
STOIACf TANIS
•TNII ST0IA6I
TIIATNINT TAMS
OTNOI TIIATNINT
TOTAL STOI/TIIAT
inaktiot fills
LANOFILLS
LAHO TIIATNINT
OCfM OISFOSAL
SWFACI IHFOUNONInTS
msTt filis
SUOFACI INFOUNONINTS
SUM AM INFOMNOaiaTS
ITMIO OISFOSAL
total OISFOSAL
INCINOIATOOS
aiCTaiNoioFTioaiLt
SOI
11
IflTT
M.ATl
1N.*9*
sot
1*
I.AIT
O.IOT
O.NO*
SO*
1
0
0
0
TOt
21
119.?**
ll.OTN
1A0.IAN
TO*
0
1.010
01
I.NIO
'
110.AON
TT.NOl
1*0.110
Oil
0
•
f
•
000
9
7
0
7
001
9
TON
f
TON
001
0
0
f
0
oos
1
•
0
0
SOI
0
*.019
90.000
9*.01*
so*
1
1.190
9
1.190
roi
0
0
9
•
00*
1
0
9
0
I.ONI
90.000
9*.1*1
TOt
1
l.ASO
0
l.AM
HI
0
f
0
•
lOAM TOTAL!
111.TIN
llT.fOl
A9N.011
IF* OT
OFOI. INC. ISUITIT
SICTloaS
1. II. Ill
AM Tl
SONICIt FIIFAMO FI
OATA. OLMISOt
1/ SNALL IWANTITT MNIIATOOS FITN LiSS TNAM 11.i IMS/TfAl I lOOO tl/NONTNI
All not IIFOITIO lUT CIHIIATOIS fITN IISSINI MANTITIfS All INCLIIOIO.
It STATI-.ONLT HAIAIOOWS FASTI NAT 11 UFIITII la AOOITIOF TO ICIA IfltfLATIO
NAIAIOOUS FASTI. TNI LAIUI OUAaTITT la SICTION |A AM llll IS UFOITU TO
Nialallt NISSINI DATA.
1/ niilTIfls cosiaTiao of fastis it nanolim nitnoo nat occuo
11
TOO
1
1
AAS
II
s«so*
I
I
ItllT
•till
o.;s
1.19
A.IT
I.IT
I.AA
0 . 1 *
a/i
a/A
F/A
a/A
a.M
1.11
a/A
I.M
a/A
0 . 0 *
0.00
O.iO
O.IS
0.01
o.oo
0.00
0 . 0 *
O.ON
a/i
0.01
o.oo
0.01
N/A
a/*
0.00
a/A
0.00
a/A
0.00
a/A
a/A
0.00
a/A
a/A
• OATA. OLOSISOI
Source: Prepared by DPRA from the 1985 Biennial Report SAS Data Library.
IV-5
choosing the larger generation value, missing data are minimized while
utilizing reported state data. A state-by-state analysis of Section I and
Section III data is presented in Appendix A.
The facilities list provided by each state in Section II of the Biennial
Program Report yielded the totals of RCRA-regulated TSD facilities and the
numbers of facilities handling onsite, offsite, or both categories of
wastes. The total quantity of RCRA-regulated waste managed was obtained
from either Section II or Section VI of the 1985 State Biennial Program
Report -- whichever is larger. Again, missing data within either Sections
II or VI were present, and the use of the larger value minimizes the
missing value problem while utilizing state-reported data as provided. \/
The disposition of waste by handling method reflects the total amounts of
waste (onsite and offsite) shown for each handling method covered in
Section VI of the state report. The overall RCRA-regulated Section VI
total should ideally equal the total amount of RCRA and state-regulated
waste managed as reported in Section II. For many of the states, the
amounts are not identical. The reasons vary but mostly reflect missing
data in Sections II or VI and double counting problems as indicated in
Chapter III.
2. Quantities of Waste Shipped Out-of-State
On the second page of the State Summary Profile, each state's shipments of
hazardous waste out of state for further processing are reported. The
profile shows the quantities shipped by their state destinations (as
reported by the state of origin). Also shown on each state's second-page
1/ Section II of the 1985 Biennial Report survey contains managed
quantities by TSD facility while Section VI contains managed
quantities by waste code and handling method. The state totals are
presumed to be the same for both sections. Hence, the approach
indicated utilizes available data without introducing any statistical
bias.
IV-6
profile is a sumnary of the "imports" of hazardous wastes, i.e., quantities
of hazardous wastes shipped to the state from other states, based on the
quantities from all states who reported having shipped-out such hazardous
wastes. It is noted that these imports were not reported by the receiving
state and no verification of these data by state was feasible within the
scope of study. The import-export data do represent both RCRA and
state-regulated hazardous wastes. Potentially state-regulated wastes in
one state are exported to an exempt state for nonhazardous waste
management; hence, the receiving state would not "verify" the receipt of
hazardous waste by their state standards.
3. Hazardous Waste Stream Detail Ranking
The third page of the profile shows the relative rank by volume of the
nation's 50 most prevalent hazardous wastes. For example, waste code D002
accounts for the largest single volume among the 50 most prevalent wastes;
code K018 ranks fiftieth, the least volume shown. The table also compares
the particular state's data to those national rankings. The table shows
the amount of each waste generated by that state and the rank of the waste
in the state's total waste volume. The last column indicates what percent
each waste contributes to the state's total.
The state and territory summary profiles, presented in alphabetical order,
follow.
IV-7
itin ri#t< w-'ti ♦srit
JOft ri#t< i^tv>■ ' . 'n n
25H ^6 yfl i)ib •^♦WV rtorift^MMAy pn bfig »ii 5 «
‘>tF
Riport — whic
II or vl w^'e pr'QiiCfii, inJ ute f^y vaht/ ft\>'' 'inV
,issnn5 >Oti« ‘r-.s-rr* wt-tl, «t ^
'•& -ini i^* ^6 U
- - ^ »*V'Sfcr 10 JnumB
vtiT 1^1
n'
ffSTOl {‘9lfi4£ •fb'M 9 ;^SOW rtDOO
tifrtWjii* xio^rnoJ b/T« fiisjs fwfT
4^.’
.wcffo>
Or ch* siscon^ thf St*'r S:iT»k^'i> Pro^Mr, Siv»t.o’s sh'r/''^nt5 ;,<
hororccHil wa$i.0 ‘3WI^‘ .tf far further t»rt raparttd*
s-rafll-* ^J*awi •''« cttorttitlos sft^pp«4 w/ th^tlr is#stin«^.*ons (A
“tportoii liy ftO »t»w 0 ^ Dr^'^^n'). Atio sficwn on ^4cf py T^O w^<]c i-sct^c*'
ify wj\iu- cod# and Mnd■ ?r,g wtfwd. ’’h# ^iU Miti|5
p ? b« th* WT*# 'or {K)t^ '-oct^' ncfi a, thy
'n0i-:4:.«rJ utOUel >-i^U wUn;.it frtrf;«i:tC‘*iS Ofi’r
bU»,
L . «•
V.-vi
. v - ■..-
L j..' <
.:‘:;:‘^;l
'pt#’
•j
■'J^
1985 BIENNIAL REPORT STATE PROFI.E FOR THE STATE OF ALABAMA
(TABLE 1 OF 3)
TOTAL NU1BER OF RCRA RE3ULATED LARGE GENERATORS (SECTION lA): 1/
TOTAL QUANTITY (TONS) OF REGULATED RASTE GENERATED (SEC. lA/IIlB): It 7,^05*159
RCRA REGULATED TSD FACILITIES (SECTION II)
FACILITIES MANAGING ONLY ONSITE GENERATED RASTE:
FACILITIES MANAGING ONLY OFFSITE GENERATED 4ASTE:
FACILITIES MANAGING RASTE GENERATED BOTH ON AND OFFSITE:
TOTAL TSD NUMBER AND PERCENT OF RASTE:
TOTAL QUANTITY OF RCRA REGULATED RASTE MANAGED (SECTION IIA/VI):
1/
2 17
IB) :
It
7,^06 tl69
PERCENT
number
OF RASTE
53
9A.16
3
D.OD V,
5
5.8 3 y.
66
100 X
) :
7,592.981
HANDLING METHOD
CODE
NUMBER OF
facilities
USING METHOD
(SECTION II)
HAZARDOUS 1
ONSITE
WASTE QUANTITIES
(SECTION VI) 3/
OFFSITE
HANDLED
total
CONTAINERS
SOI
29
4,161
576
4,737
STORAGE TAN
1985 biennial REPORT STATE PROFILE FOR THE STATE OF AlAS
0
0
0
0
TREATMENT TANKS
TOl
3
3*676
657
4*333
OTHER TREATMENT
T04
7
25*296
252
25*547
total stor/treat
29*663
2*909
32*572
INJECTION WELLS
079
0
0
0
0
LANDFILLS
08D
3
294
0
294
LAND TREATMENT
081
0
0
0
0
OCEAN DISPOSAL
D82
0
0
0
0
SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS
D83
0
0
0
0
WASTE PILES
S03
.
4
106*486
0
106*436
SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS
S04
5
13*323
0
13*323
SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS
T02
0
0
0
0
OTHER disposal
D84
1
8
0
8
TOTAL disposal
120*111
0
120*111
INCINERATORS
TOO
2
420
0
420
RECYCLING(OPTIONAL)
ROI
0
0
0
0
GRAND total:
150*195
2*909
153*103
source: prepared for EPA by DPRA, INC. (SURVEY SECTIONS I* II* III AND VI
DATA. DL8S350)
1/ SMALL QUANTITY GENERATORS MITM LESS THAN 13.2 TONS/YEAR (1000 KG/MONTH)
ARE NOT REPORTED BUT GENERATORS MITH MISSING QUANTITIES ARE INCLUDED.
2/ STATE-ONLY HAZARDOUS ^ASTE MAY BE REPORTED IN ADDITION TO RCRA REGULATED
HAZARDOUS liASTE. THE LARGER QUANTITY IN SECTION lA AND IIIB IS REPORTED TO
MINIMIZE MISSING DATA.
3/ multiple counting of WASTES BY HANDLING METHOD MAY OCCUR.
1985 biennial report STATE PROFI.E FOR THE STATE OF COLORADO
(TABLE 2 OF 3)
TOTAL QUANTITY OF HAZARDOUS WASTE TOTAL QUANTITY OF HAZARDOUS WASTE
reported shipped out of state reported shipped FROi OTHER STATES
(EXPORTS): (IMPORTS): 1/
RECEIVING
STATE
TONS
SHIPPED
ALABAMA
3,960
ARKANSAS
7
-/ 7 -
1985 BIENNIAL REPORT STATE PROFILE FOR THE STATE OF CONNECTICLir
(TABLE 1 OF 3)
TOTAL NUNBER OF RCRA RE3JLATEO LARGE GENERATORS (SECTION lA): 1/ 37b
TOTAL QUANTITY (TONS) OF REGULATED ^ASTE GENERATED (SEC. lA/IIIB): 2/ 173*011
PERCENT
RCRA REGULATED TSD FACILITIES (SECTION II) NUNBER OF WASTE
facilities IANAGING only ONSITE GENERATED WASTE: 109 35.02 'L
FACILITIES MANAGING ONLY OFFSITE GENERATED WASTE: 13 53.8A X
facilities MANAGING WASTE GENERATED BOTH ON AND OFFSITE: 11 11.IH 'L
TOTAL TSD NUMBER AND
per:
ENT OF WASTE:
138
100 x
TOTAL QUANTITY OF RCRA REGULATED WASTE MANAGED (SECTION
I lA/VI):
174*213
NUMBER OF
HAZARDOUS WASTE QUANTITIES
handled
facilities
(SECTION VI)
3/
USING METHOD
HANDLING METHOD
CODE
(SECTION II)
ONSITE
OFFSITE
total
CONTAINERS
SOI
99
5*419
6*510
11*928
STORAGE TANKS
S02
31
4*884
5*312
10*196
OTHER STORAGE
S05
0
0
0
0
TREATMENT TANKS
TOl
7
164
38,119
38*283
OTHER TREATMENT
T04
23
2*061
46*531
48*592
total stdr/treat
12*528
96*472
109*300
INJECTION WELLS
D79
0
0
0
0
LANDFILLS
08D
b
942
5*176
6*118
LAND TREATMENT
D81
0
0
D
0
OCEAN DISPOSAL
082
0
0
0
0
SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS
083
3
10*468
0
10*468
WASTE PILES
S03
3
2*486
140
2*626
SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS
S0<» '
16
6*103
0
6*103
SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS
T02
3
74
490
563
OTHER DISPOSAL
084
0
0
0
0
TOTAL disposal
20*072
5*805
25*878
INCINERATORS
T03
1
0
0
0
RECYCLING(OPTIONAl)
ROl
0
33*051
6* 155
39*206
GRAND total:
65*651
108*433
174*084
SOURCE: PREPARED FOR
EPA
BY DPRA, INC. (SURVEY SECTIONS
I* II* III
AND
VI
DATA. aL88350)
1/ SMALL aUAKTITY GENERATORS WITH LESS THAN 13.2 TONS/YEAR (1000 KG/MONTH)
ARE N3T REPORTED BUT GENERATORS WITH MISSING QUANTITIES ARE INCLUDED.
2/ STATE-ONLY HAZARDOUS WASTE MAY BE REPORTED IN ADDITION TO RCRA REGULATED
HAZARDOUS WASTE. THE LARGER QUANTITY IN SECTION lA AND IIIB IS REPORTED TO
MINIMIZE MISSING DATA.
3/ MULTIPLE COUNTING OF WASTES BY HANDLING METHOD MAY OCCUR.
1985 BIENNIAL REPORT STATE PROFILE FOR THE STATE OF CONNECTICUT
(TABLE 2 OF 3)
TOTAL QUANTITY OF
HAZARDOUS WASTE
total quantity of hazardous
WASTE
REPORTED SHIPPED
OUT OF STATE
REPORTED SHIPPED FROM OTHER
STATES
(EXPORTS):
(IMPORTS): 1/
RECEIVING
TONS
STATES SHIPPING
TONS
STATE
SHIPPED
TO CONNECTICUT
SHIPPED
ALABAMA
524
ALABAMA
11
FLORIDA
25
FLORIDA
49
FOREIGN
23*273
GEORGIA
0
ILLINOIS
326
IOWA
49
KENTUCKY
395
ILLINOIS
12
LOUISIANA
371
INDIANA
1
MASSACHUS ETTS
3,979
MASSACHUSETTS
17,629
MARYLAND
43
MARYLAND
71
MICHIGAN
913
MAINE
1,276
MISSOURI
23
MICHIGAN
7
NORTH CAROLINA
2,429
MINNESOTA
90
NEW JERSEY
10 ,233
MISSOURI
0
NEW YORK
9,020
NORTH CAROLINA
60
OHIO
5,882
new HAMPSHIRE
15
PENNSYLVANIA
14,494
NEW JERSEY
3,549
RHODE ISLAND
734
NEW YORK
6,273
SOUTH CAROLINA
5,004
OHIO
1
TEXAS
54
PENNSYLVANIA
3,558
VIRGINIA
1,426
PUERTO RICO
16
WISCONSIN
67
RHODE island
3,321
VIRGINIA
151
TOTAL
76,212
VERMONT
687
WASHINGTON
5
WISCONSIN
50
TOTAL
36,582
source: prepared FOR EPA BY OPRA, INC. (SURVEY SECTION IV DATA. 0L8835O)
1/ THE 3UANTITIES REPRESENT THE TONS REPORTED BY SHIPPING STATES. TONS SHIPPED
HAY INCLUDE STATE-ONLY REGULATED HAZARDOUS .^ASTE. QUANTITIES RECEIVED BY
EACH STATE .4ERE NOT REQUESTED.
1985 BIE'iHIAL REPORT STATE PROFILE FOR THE STATE OF CONNeCTICOT
(TABLE 3 OF 3)
iJASTE STREAM GE,DERATION STATE RANKING COMPARED TO NATIONAL RANKING (TOP FIFTY)
NATIONAL
RANK
WASTE
CODE
3UANT1TY GENERATED
IN state (TONS)
state WASTE
CODE RANK
PERCENT OF
STATE TOTA^
1
0002
42,674
1
23.97
2
MOMX
1,519
15
0.85
3
OOMX
8,281
7
4.65
4
000.7
8,643
5
4.85
5
<0MX
NONE
N/A
N/ A
6
F003
2,785
11
1.56
7
0003
1,696
13
0.95
8
0001
20,456
4
11.49
9
<062
544
20
0.30
10
F006
35,629
2
20.01
11
<061
1,043
18
0.58
12
FOMX
8,594
6
4.82
13
0008
21,153
3
11.88
lA
K104
NONE
N/A
N/A
15
<013
NONE
N/A
N/A
16
<011
NONE
N/A
N/A
17
<087
NONE
N/A
N/A
18
P020
NONE
N/A
N/A
19
F002
1,652
14
0.92
20
<016
NONE
N/A
N/A
21
U036
NONE
N/A
N/A
22
<048
none
N/A
N/A
23
F007
1,491
16
0.83
2A
UOMX
117
26
0.06
25
F005
1,923
12
1.08
26
FOOl
4,823
9
2.70
27
<051
NONE
N/A
N/A
28
F019
81
32
0.04
29
0005
551
19
0.30
30
<001
NONE
N/A
N/A
31
<049
NONE
N/A
N/A
32
0000
74
34
0.04
33
0006
3,163
10
1.77
34
F009
1,355
17
0.76
35
0009
40
39
0.02
36
<047
NONE
N/A
N/A
37
F024
NONE
N/A
N/A
38
0004
7
48
0.00
39
<022
NONE
N/A
N/A
40
<044
170
24
0.09
41
J188
62
36
0.03
42
<071
NONE
N/A
N/A
43
0010
<1
09
0.00
44
K060
NONE
N/A
N/A
45
J220
167
25
0.09
46
K002
NONE
N/A
N/A
47
K031
NONE
N/A
N/A
40
<052
NONE
N/A
N/A
49
<003
NONE
N/A
N/A
50
<010
NONE
N/A
N/A
SOURCE:
PREPARED
FOR EPA BY DPRA, INC.
(SURVEY section
IIIB DATA. DL88350)
1905 biennial report STATE PROFUE FOR THE STATE OF DELA.
NEW JERSEY 9,190
PENNSYLVANIA I
RHODE ISLAND 25
TEXAS 0
TOTAL 9,223
total 70,230
SOURCE: PREPARED FOR EPA BY DPRA, INC. (SURVEY SECTION IV DATA. 0L98350)
1/ THE 3JANTITIES REPRESENT THE TONS REPORTED BY SHIPPING STATES. TONS SHIPPED
MAY INCLUDE STATE-ONLY REGULATED HAZARDOUS WASTE. QUANTITIES RECEIVED BY
EACH STATE WERE NOT REQUESTED.
-M-
1905 biennial report STATE PROFIuE FOR THE STATE OF OELAi^ARE
(TABLE 3 OF 3)
WASTE STREAM GENERATION STATE RANKING COMPARED TO NATIONAL RANKING (TOP FIFTY)
NATIONAL
RANK
WASTE
CODE
OUANTITY GENERATED
IN STATE (TONS)
STATE WASTE
CODE RANK
PERCENT OF
STATE total
1
0002
2.858
6
3.02
2
MOMX
NONE
N/A
N/ A
3
OOHX
NONE
N/A
N/A
4
0007
3,510
5
3.71
5
KOMX
NONE
N/A
N/ A
6
F003
1,123
12
1.18
7
0003
21
18
0.02
8
0001
NONE
N/A
N/ A
9
<06 2
1,408
11
1.48
10
F006
305
16
0.32
11
<061
55,781
1
59.01
12
FOMX
NONE
N/A
N/A
13
0008
1,824
10
1.92
14
K104
NONE
N/A
N/A
15
K013
NONE
N/A
N/A
16
<011
NONE
N/A
N/ A
17
<087
NONE
N/A
N/A
18
P020
NONE
N/A
N/A
19
F002
613
14
0.64
20
<016
NONE
N/A
N/A
21
U036
NONE
N/A
N/A
22
<048
1,940
9
2.05
23
F007
NONE
N/A
N/A
24
UOMX
NONE
N/A
N/A
25
F005
23
17
0.02
26
FOOl
20
20
0.02
27
<051
8,719
2
9.22
28
F019
NONE
N/A
N/A
29
0005
6
21
0.00
30
<001
. NONE
N/A
N/A
31
<049
NONE
N/A
N/A
32
0000
NONE
N/A
N/A
33
0006
NONE
N/A
N/A
34
F009
NONE
N/A
N/A
35
0009
6,850
3
7.24
36
<047
NONE
N/A
N/A
37
F024
NONE
N/A
N/A
38
0004
320
15
0.33
39
<022
NONE
N/A
N/A
40
<044
NONE
N/A
N/A
41
J188
1
23
0.00
42
<071
3,633
4
3.84
43
0010
NONE
N/A
N/A
44
K060
NONE
N/A
N/A
45
0220
NONE
N/A
N/A
46
<002
NONE
N/A
N/A
47
<031
NONE
N/A
N/A
46
<052
NONE
N/A
N/A
49
<083
NONE
N/A
N/A
50
<018
NONE
N/A
N/A
SOURCE:
PREPARED
FOR EPA BY DPRA, INC.
(SURVEY SECTION
IIIB DATA. ')L88350)
1905 3IENMIAL REPORT STATE PROFILE FOR THE STATE OF DISTRICT 3? COlUIBIA
(TABLE 1 3F 3)
TOTAL NUiBER OF RCRA REGJLATED LARGE GENERATORS (SECTION lA): 1/
TOTAL QUANTITY (TONS) OF REGULATED #(ASTE GENERATED (SEC. lA/IIlB): 2/
RCRA REGJLATED TSO FACILITIES (SECTION II) NUiBER
facilities MANAGING ONLY ONSITE GENERATED »^ASTE: 33 20.5h L
facilities IANAGING only offsite generated /^ASTE: 10 22.18 •.
facilities managing -^ASTE generated BuTH on A.nO OFFSITE: 3 37.23 .
TOTAL TSO NUNBER AND PERCENT OF /^ASTE: 100 •.
TOTAL QUANTITY OF RCRA REGULATED RASTE '1ANAGED (SECTION IIA/VI): 94,93c
TOTAL QUANTITY OF RCRA REGULATED RASTE '1ANAGED (SECTION IIA/VI): 94,93c
HANDLING METHOD
CODE
NUMBER OF
facilities
US ING METHOD
(SECTION II)
HAZARDOUS M
ONSITE
ASTE QUANTITIES
(SECTION VI) 3/
OFFSITE
handled
total
CONTAINERS
SOI
30
595
-( TONS )-
629
1,2 24
STORAGE TANKS
S02
8
493
502
995
OTHER STORAGE
SOS
0
0
0
0
TREATMENT TANKS
TOl
7
49,583
33,329
82,912
OTHER TREATMENT
T04
3
50
12
62
TOTA. STOR/TREAT
INJECTION WELLS
079
0
50,721
0
34,472
0
85,193
0
LANDFILLS
D80
2
3
2,737
2,790
LAND TREATMENT
D81
0
0
0
0
OCEAN DISPOSAL
D82
0
0
D
0
SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS
D83
0
0
0
0
WASTE PILES
S03
1
71
0
71
SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS
S04
3
1,925
0
1,925
SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS
T02
3
1 , 304
D
1 ,304
OTHER DISPOSAL
084
1
158
0
153
total disposal
INCINERATORS
T03
3
3,481
3,491
2,787
0
6,248
3,491
RECYCLING(OPTIONAL)
ROl
0
0
D
0
GRAND total:
57,673
37,259
94,932
SOURCE: PREPARED FOR EPA BY DPRA, INC. (SURVEY SECTIONS I, II, III AND VI
DATA. OL9035O)
1/ SMALL QUANTITY GENERATORS WITH LESS THAN 13.2 TONS/YEAR (1000 KG/HONTH)
ARE NOT REPORTED BUT GENERATORS WITH HISSING QUANTITIES ARE INCLUDED.
2/ STATE-ONLY HAZARDOUS WASTE MAY BE REPORTED IN ADDITION TO RCRA REGJLATED
HAZARDOUS WASTE. THE LARGER QUANTITY IN SECTION lA AND IIIB IS REPORTED TO
MINIMIZE MISSING DATA.
3/ MULTIPLE COUNTING OF WASTES 3Y HANDLING METHOD MAY OCCUR.
1985 BIENNIAL REPORT STATE PROFILE FOR THE STATE OF lO^A
(TABLE 2 OF 3)
TOTAL QUANTITY OF HAZARDOUS >^ASTE TOTAL QUANTITY OF HAZARDOUS WASTE
REPORTED SHIPPED OUT
OF STATE
REPORTED SHIPPED
FROM OTHER STATES
(EXPORTS):
(IMPORTS): 1/
RECEIVING
TONS
states SHIPPING
TONS
STATE
SHIPPED
TO IOWA
SHIPO£0
ALABAMA
L» 373
ILLINOIS
18
ARKANSAS
25
M INNESOTA
1,518
CALI^ORNIA
2
M I S S OU RI
5
COLORADO
95
NEBRASKA
8 4
CONNECTICUT
49
WISCONSIN
3, 80 1
=OREIGN
2
ILLINO IS
5,440
TOTAL
8,42-^
INDIANA
1,010
KANSAS
116
KENTUCKY
811
LOUISIANA
1,190
MICHIGAN
92
MINNESOTA
4,587
NEBRASKA
74
NEW JERSEY
74
NEVADA
54
OHIO
325
OKLAHOMA
53
PENNSYLVANIA
5
SOUTH DAKOTA
27
TENNESSEE
1
TEXAS
253
WISCONSIN
2,591
TOTAL
19,259
SOURCE: PREPARED FOR
EPA BY DPRA, INC
. (SURVEY SECTION IV
DATA. DL88350)
1/ THE QUANTITIES REPRESENT THE TONS
RE=>ORTED BY SHIPPING
states, tons shippe
HAY INCLUDE STATE-ONLY REGULATED HAZARDOUS WASTE. QUANTITIES RECEIVED BY
EACH STATE WERE NOT REQUESTED.
1985
BIENNIAL REPORT STATE
PROFIlE FOR THE
STATE OF I04A
(TABLE
3 JF 3 )
»^ASTE
STREAM GENERATION STATE RANKING
COMPARED TO NATIONAu RANKING (TOP FI^TY)
NATIONAL WASTE
QUANTITY GENERATED
STATE «ASTE
PERCENT OF
RANK
CODE
IN STATE (TONS)
CODE RANK
STATE total
1
0002
18,151
3
15.02
2
lOIX
4,964
6
4. 10
3
DONX
34,380
2
28.43
4
0007
35,673
1
29.52
5
SOUTH CAROLINA
1,2o9
TENNESSEE
207
TOTAL
89,626
TEXAS
169
VIRGINIA
442
TOTAL
132,953
SOURCE: PREPARED
FOR
EPA BY OPRA, INC.
(SURVEY SECTION IV DATA. 0LB8350)
1/ THE 3JANTITIES REPRESENT THE TONS REPORTED BY SHIPPING STATES. TONS SHIPPE
MAY INCLUDE STATE-ONLY REGULATED HAZAROOUS .^ASTE. 3JANTITIES RECEIVED BY
EACH STATE WERE NOT REQUESTED.
1985 biennial report STATE PROFI.E FOR TiE STATE OF flARY^AND
(TABLE 3 OF 3)
.4ASTE stream GENERATION STATE RANKING COMPARED TO NATIONAL RANKING (TOP FIETY)
NATIONAL
RANK
MASTE
CODE
quantity generated
IN STATE (TONS )
STATE ^ASTE
CODE rank
PERCENT 0
STATE TOT
1
0002
180,917
2
25.90
2
MOMX
lA,823
6
2.12
3
DOMX
333,069
1
A7.69
A
0007
9A,80A
3
13.57
5
ARE NOT REPORTED BUT GENERATORS mITH MISSING QUANTITIES ARE INCLUDED.
2/ STATE-ONLY HAZARDOUS RASTE MAY BE REPORTED IN ADDITION TO RCRA REGULATED
HAZARDOUS RASTE. THE LARGER QUANTITY IN SECTION lA ANO IIIB IS REPORTED TQ
MINIMIZE MISSING DATA.
3/ multiple COUNTING OF RASTES BY HANDLING METHOD MAY OCCUR.
1985 BIENNIAL REPORT STATE PROFILE FOR T-lE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI
(TABLE 2 OF 3)
TOTAL QUANTITY OF
HAZARDOUS WASTE
total QUANTITY OF HAZARDOUS
AST£
reported shipped
OUT
OF STATE
REPORTED SHIPPED FROM OTHER
STATES
(EXPORTS):
(IMPORTS): 1/
RECEIVING
TONS
STATES SHIPPING
TONS
STATE
SHIPPED
TO MISSISSIPPI
SHIPPED
ALABAMA
6,DBA
-
ALABAMA
26 7
ARKANSAS
8,21A
ARKANSAS
77
=OREIGN
A27
FLORIDA
13
ILLINOIS
20
INDIANA
2 6 6
INDIANA
Ab3
KENTUCKY
42
KENTUCKY
2,359
uOUI SI ANA
2 3, 45 7
LOUISIANA
,6d3
MISSOURI
6d
MICHIGAN
A
OHIO
62
MISSOURI
31
TENNESSEE
492
OHIO
7
TEXAS
339
OKLAHOMA
10,512
WEST VIRGINIA
24
PENNSYLVANIA
1,163
TENNESSEE
7,715
TOTAL
2 3,109
TEXAS
623
WISCONSIN
32
TOTAL
33,362
SOURCE: PREPARED
FDR
EPA BY DPRA,
INC
. (SURVEY SECTION IV DATA. OL9035O)
1/ THE QUANTITIES REPRESENT THE
TONS
REPORTED BY SHIPPING STATES.
TONS SHIPP
MAY INCLJOE state-only REGULATED HAZARDOUS WASTE.
EACH STATE WERE NOT REQUESTED.
QUANTITIES RECEIVED BY
- 75 -
1585 BIENNIAL REPORT STATE PROFILE F3R TriE STATE 3F MISSISSIP®!
(TABLE 3 OF 3)
^ASTE STREA*1 GENERATION STATE RANKING CONPAKED TO NATIONA. RANKING (TOP FIFTY)
NATIONA.
RANK
<^ASTE
CODE
ouantity generated
IN STATE (TONS)
state haste
CODE RANK
PERCENT OF
state TOTAw
1
0002
2 40,587
4
9.59
2
lonx
2,919
11
0.11
3
OONX
742,040
1
29.59
A
0007
640,418
2
25.5 4
5
<0^X
950
16
0.03
6
F003
213
25
0.00
7
0003
18,851
7
0.75
0
0001
75,467
6
3.00
9
<062
642
19
0.02
iO
F006
2,408
12
0.09
11
<061
NONE
N/A
N/ A
12
FONX
1,319
15
0.05
13
0008
1,740
13
0.06
14
<104
202,623
5
3.08
15
<013
NONE
N/A
N/ A
16
<011
NONE
N/A
N/A
17
<087
NONE
N/A
N/A
18
P020
550,383
3
21.94
19
F002
235
24
0.00
20
<016
NONE
N/A
N/A
21
J036
none
N/A
N/A
22
<048
710
17
0.02
23
F007
461
20
0.01
24
UOMX
42
30
0.00
25
F005
8,199
9
0,32
26
FOOl
425
21
0.01
27
<051
1,454
14
0.05
28
F019
4
44
0.00
29
0005
NONE
N/A
N/A
30
<001
9,929
8
0,39
31
<049
64
29
0.00
32
0000
9
39
0.00
33
0006
NONE
N/A
N/ A
34
F009
NONE
N/A
N/A
35
0009
9
40
0.00
36
<047
NONE
N/A
N/ A
37
F024
NONE
N/A
N/ A
38
0004
1
56
0.00
39
<022
2
49
0.00
40
<044
NONE
N/A
N/A
41
J188
298
23
0.01
42
<071
NONE
N/A
N/A
43
0010
NONE
N/A
N/ A
44
<060
NONE
N/A
N/ A
45
U220
20
35
0.00
46
<002
NONE
N/A
N/A
47
<031
NONE
N/A
N/ A
48
<052
<1
65
0.00
49
<083
3,474
10
0.13
50
<018
NONE
N/A
N/ A
SOURCE: PREPARED FOR EPA BY DPRA, INC. (SURVEY SECTION IIIB DATA. 0L33350)
1985 BIENNIAL REPORT STATE PRQFI.E FOR T^E STATE OF filSSQJRI
(TABLE 1 OF 3)
RCRA REGJLATEO TSD FACILITIES (SECTION II)
facilities managing ONLT onsite generated WASTE:
facilities managing only offsite generated WASTE:
facilities 'MANAGING WASTE GENERATED BOTH ON AND OFFSITE:
TOTAL TSO NU13ER AND PERCENT OF WASTE:
TOTAL OUANTITY OF RCRA REGULATED WASTE MANAGED (ScCTiUN IIA/VI):
1/
I9L
13 ) :
2/
68,113
PERCENT
NUMBER
OF WASTE
25.8 6 ::
A1
10.82 •/.
9
b3.3E •/.
96
100
) :
34,09Z
HANDLING METHOD
CODE
NUMBER OF
FACILITIES
USING METHOD
(SECTION II)
hazardous
onsite
»*ASTE OUANTiriES
(SECTION VI) 3/
OFFSITE
handled
total
-( TONS )-
CONTAINERS
SOI
40
5,432
0
5,432
STORAGE TANKS
S02
7
67
3
67
OTHER STORAGE
S05
2
2,091
0
2,091
TREATMENT TANKS
TOl
8
0
0
0
OTHER TREATMENT
T04
8
1,659
0
1,659
TOTA. STOR/TREAT
9,249
0
9,24«)
INJECTION WELLS
079
2
9
0
9
LANDFILLS
D80
9
17,111
3
17,111
LAND TREATMENT
D81
0
0
0
0
OCEAN DISPOSAL
D82
0
0
0
0
SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS
D83
0
0
0
0
WASTE PILES
S03
1
55
0
55
SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS
S04
9
2,709
0
2,709
SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS
T02
2
2
0
2
OTHER DISPOSAL
D84
9
926
0
926
TOTAL DISPOSAL
20,811
0
20,811
INCINERATORS
TOO
14
3,348
3
3,343
RECYCLING(OPTIONA. )
ROl
0
0
0
0
GRAND total:
33,407
0
33,407
source: PREPARED FOR EPA BY DPRA, INC. (SURVEY SECTIONS I, II, III AND VI
DATA. DL88350)
1/ SMALL QUANTITY GENERATORS WITH LESS THAN 13.2 TONS/YEAR (1000 KG/MONTH)
ARE NOT REPORTED BUT GENERATORS WITH MISSING 3JANTIT1ES ARE INCLUDED.
2/ STATE-ONLY HAZARDOUS WASTE MAY BE REPORTED IN ADDITION TO RCRA REGJLATtO
HAZARDOUS WASTE. THE LARGER 3JANTITY IN SECTION lA AND IIIB IS REPORTED TO
MINIMIZE MISSING DATA.
3/ multiple COUNTING OF WASTES BY HANDLING METHOD MAY OCCUR.
- 11 -
l'J85 BIENNIAL REPORT STATE PROFI.E FOR THE STATE OF HISS3JRI
(TABLE I OF 3)
TOTAL QUANTITY OF
HAZARDOUS WASTE
TOTAL QUANTITY OF HAZARDOUS
WASTE
REPORTED SHIPPED
OUT
OF STATE
REPORTED SHIPPED FROM
OTHER
S TATES
(EXPORTS):
(IMPORTS): 1/
RECEIVING
TONS
STATES Shipping
TONS
STATE
SHIPPED
ro MISSOURI
SHIPPED
ALABAMA
1 ♦ 006
ALABAMA
15
ARKANSAS
1 » 309
ARKANSAS
1,020
ARIZONA
11
CALIFORNIA
5o
COLORADO
9
CONNECT!OUT
23
CONNECTICUT
0
ILLINOIS
4, Z6 3
-OREIGN
6,074
INDIANA
40
IOWA
5
KANSAS
578
ILLINOIS
12,848
MASSACHUSETTS
1,13 1
INDIANA
5,213
MARYLAND
2 18
KANSAS
3,625
MAINE
68
KENTUCKY
2,733
MINNESOTA
229
LOUISIANA
2,515
M I S S OU R I
5
MICHIGAN
335
MISSISSIPPI
3 1
MINNESOTA
1,733
NEBRASKA
54
MISSOURI
5
NEW JERSEY
465
MISSISSIPPI
68
NEW MEXICO
1
NEBRASKA
7
NEW YORK
539
NEW JERSEY
d8
OKLAHOMA
42
NEW YORK
174
RHODE ISLAND
16 1
OHIO
939
TENNESSEE
134
OKLAHOMA
3,343
VIRGINIA
19
PENNSYLVANIA
2
VERMONT
3
SOUTH CAROLINA
29
WISCONSIN
20
TENNESSEE
374
TEXAS
233
TOTAL
9,621
UTAH
7
WISCONSIN
1,009
TOTAL
4 3,6 o6
SOURCE: PREPARED
FOR
EPA BY DPRA, INC.
(SURVEY SECTION IV DATA
. Dl88350)
1/ THE QUANTITIES REPRESENT THE TONS REPORTED BY SHIPPING STATES. TONS SHIPPE.
MAY INCLUDE STATE-ONLY REGUlATEO HAZARDOUS WASTE. 3JANTITIES RECEIVED BY
EACH STATE WERE NOT REQUESTED.
1905 BIENNIAL REPORT STATE PROFI.E FOR TriE STATE OF fllSSOJRI
(TABLE 3 OF 3)
WASTE STREAM GENERATION STATE RANKING COMPARED TO NATIONAL RANKING (TOP FIFTY)
NATIONAL
RANK
WASTE
CODE
OUANTITY GENERATED
IN state (TONS)
STATE WASTE
CODE rank
PERCENT OF
STATE total
1
0002
15»662
1
2A.58
2
NONX
A27
15
0.67
3
OONX
163
19
0.25
4
0007
2,510
9
3.93
5
0RTED BY SHIPPING STATES. TONS SHIPP
MAY INCLUDE STATE-ONLY REGULATED HAZARDOUS wASTE. QUANTITIES RECEIVED BY
EACH STATE WERE NOT REQUESTED.
199 5 BIEN'JIAL ^EPQt^T ST4TE PKQFI.E FOR T-»E STATE 3F nONTA'^A
(TABLE 3 3F 3)
WASTE STREA1 GENERATION STATE RAN
543 ,44b
PERCE NT
OF WASTE
3 2 . 9 ^
13.37 ::
3.19 •.
TOTAL TSD NUMBER AND
PERCENT
OF WASTE:
3
100
total quantity of RCRA REGULATED WASTE MANAGED
(SECTION
I I A/VI):
5,01
NUMBER OF
HAZARDOUS WASTE QUANTITIES
handled
facilities
(SECTION VI)
3/
USING method
HANDLING METHOD
CODE
(SECTION II)
ONSITE
OFFSITE
total
-—( TONS )—■
CONTAINERS
SOI
6
140
6o 9
809
STORAGE TANKS
S02
3
0
35
35
OTHER STORAGE
SOS
1
5
5
10
TREATMENT TANKS
TOl
1
41
19
60
OTHER TREATMENT
T04
2
1 ,699
17
1,716
tota. stor/treat
1,885
744
2,629
INJECTION WELLS
D79
0
0
0
0
LANDFILLS
D8D
0
0
0
0
LAND TREATMENT
081
0
0
D
0
OCEAN DISPOSAL
082
0
0
0
0
SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS
083
0
0
0
0
WASTE PILES
S03
0
0
D
0
SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS
S04
2
2,386
0
2,336
SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS
T02
0
0
0
0
OTHER DISPOSAL
084
0
0
D
0
TOTAL disposal
2,386
0
2,386
INCINERATORS
T03
0
0
0
0
RECYCL ING(0PTI0;NAL )
ROl
0
0
0
0
GRAND total:
4,271
7 44
5,015
SOURCE: PREPARED FOR
EP A BY
DPRA, INC. (SURVEY
SECTIONS
I , II, III
AND
V I
DATA. DL88350)
1/ SMALL QUANTITY GENERATORS WITH LESS THAN 13.2 TONS/YEAR (1000 KG/MONTH)
ARE NOT REPORTED BUT GENERATORS WITH MISSING QUANTITIES ARE INCLUDED.
2/ STATE-ONLY HAZARDOUS WASTE MAY BE REPORTED IN ADDITION TO RCRA REGULATED
HAZARDOUS WASTE. THE LARGER QUANTITY IN SECTION lA AND III0 IS REPORTED TQ
MINIMIZE MISSING DATA.
3/ multiple COUNTING OF WASTES BY HANDLING METHOD MAY OCCUR.
1985 BIENNIAL i^cPORT STATE PROFI.E F3R THE STATE DF NE8 RaS:
0.0 0 >:
0.0 J 7.
LOO 4
total OUANTITY of RCRA REGULATED WASTE MANAGED (SECTION liA/VI):
HANDLING METHOD
CODE
NUMBER UF
facilities
US ING METHOD
(SECTION II)
HAZARDOUS
ONSITE
WASTE QUANTITIES
(SECTION VI) 3/
OFFSITE
handled
total
-(TONS )-
CONTAINERS
SOI
0
130
0
130
STORAGE TANKS
S02
0
&8
D
58
OTHER STORAGE
SOS
0
0
D
0
TREATMENT TANKS
TOl
0
159
0
159
OTHER TREATMENT
T04
0
25
0
25
TOTA. STDR/TREAT
AAA
D
AAA
INJECTION WELLS
07?
0
111
0
111
LANDFILLS
U8D
0
22
0
22
LAND TREATMENT
D81
0
1,059
D
1,059
OCEAN DISPOSAL
D82
0
0
0
0
SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS
083
0
285
D
?35
WASTE PILES
S03
0
0
D
0
SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS
S04 •
0
0
0
0
SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS
T02
0
A,A35
0
A , A85
OTHER DISPOSAL
U8H
0
A3
D
A3
TOTAL DISPOSAL
5,005
D
5,305
INCINE RATORS
T03
0
177
0
177
RECYCLING(OPTIONAw)
ROl
0
0
0
0
GRAND total:
5,625
0
5,525
source: prepared for EPA by OPRA, INC. (SURVEY SECTIONS !♦ II» III AND VI
DATA. DL88350)
1/ SMALL OUANTITY GENERATORS WITH LESS THAN 13.2 TONS/YEAR (1000 KG/MONTH)
ARE NOT REPORTED BUT GENERATORS WITH HISSING 3JANTITIES ARE INCLUDED.
2/ STATE-ONLY HAZARDOUS WASTE MAY BE REPORTED IN A00ITI3N TO RCRA REGULATED
HAZARDOUS WASTE. THE LARGER 3UANTITY IN SECTION lA AND IIIB IS REPDRTED TO
MINIMIZE MISSING DATA.
3/ MULTIPLE COUNTING OF WASTES BY HANDLING METHOD MAY OCCUR.
- 96 -
L?85 BIENNIAL REPORT STATE PRGFI.E FDk THE STATE JF NEW 1E
1985 biennial report STATE PR3FI.E FOR HE STATE 3F DKLAhD'IA
(TABLE 1 3F 3)
RCRA REGJLATED TSD FACILITIES (SECTION II)
facilities 'IANAGING only onsite GENERATED RASTE:
FACILITIES MANAGING ONLY OFFSITE GENERATED -liASTE:
FACI-ITIES managing -^ASTE generated 30T^ ON and offsite:
TOTAL TSO NUMdER AND PERCENT OF ^ASTE*.
total quantity of RCRA regulated /^ASTE managed (SECTION IIA/VI):
1/
lla
13 ) : 2/
1.591,234
PERCENT
NUMBER
OF ^ASTE
3D
63.5U 'L
11
23.85 X
5
7.6 5 /.
46
o
o
) :
2,171,943
HANDLING METHOD
CODE
NUMBER OF
facilities
USING method
(SECTION II)
HA ZARD OUS
ONSITE
WASTE 3UANTITIES HANDLED
(SECTION VI) 3/
OFFSITE total
-( TONS )—■
CONTAINERS
SOI
22
2,979
2,567
5,546
STORAGE TANREPARED for EPA dY DPRA, INC
1/ THE QUANTITIES REPRESENT THE TONS
. (SURVEY SECTION IV DATA. DL38350)
REPORTED BY SHIPPING STATES. TONS
SHIPPED
WAY INCLUDE state-only REGULATED HAZARDOUS WASTE. QUANTITIES RECEIVED 3Y
EACH STATE WERE NUT REQUESTED.
1^85 biennial report state profile for the state of south uaota
(TABLE 3 of 3)
WASTE STREAM GENERATION STATE RANORTEO BY SHIPPING STATES. TONS SHIPPE
MAY include state-only REGULATED HAZARDOUS WASTE. 3UANTITIES RECEIVED BY
EACH STATE WERE NOT REQUESTED.
L935 BI£NNIAL REPORT STATE PRQFI.E FOR THE STATE OF TENNESSEE
(TABLE 3 OF 3)
^ASTE STREAI GENERATION STATE RANKING COMPARED TO NATIONA^ RANKING (TOP FIFTY)
NATIONAL
RANK
RASTE
CODE
QUANTITY GENERATED
IN state (TONS)
state .^aste
CODE RANK
PERCENT OF
STATE total
1
0002
336 »239
2
1.01
2
101X
32»113»455
1
96.73
3
001X
NONE
N/A
N/ A
4
0007
194,542
4
0.58
5
KONX
NONE
N/A
N/A
6
= 00 3
32, 140
6
0. J9
7
0003
20,540
10
0.06
0
0001
27,366
0
0.00
9
<062
102,921
5
0.31
10
= 006
5,534
1,3
0.01
11
<061
2,148
19
0.00
12
FO'IX
NONE
N/A
N/A
13
0008
677
25
o
o
.
o
14
<104
NONE
N/A
N/ A
15
<013
NONE
N/A
N/A
16
<011
NONE
N/A
N/A
17
<067
3
46
o
.
o
18
P020
NONE
N/A
N/ A
19
F002
240,776
3
0.74
20
<016
NONE
N/A
N/A
21
J036
16
30
0.00
22
<040
NONE
N/A
N/A
23
F007
31,438
7
0.09
24
JOMX
NONE
N/A
N/A
25
F005
4,200
15
0.01
26
FOOl
4,607
14
0.01
27
<051
NONE
N/A
N/A
20
F019
4,040
16
0.01
29
0005
1,435
20
0.00
30
<001
1
53
o
o
.
o
31
<049
none
N/A
N/A
32
0000
NONE
N/A
N/A
33
0006
18,103
11
0.05
34
F009
12,926
12
0.03
35
0009
325
28
0.00
36
<047
26,826
9
0.00
37
F024
1
56
0.00
38
0004
775
24
0.00
39
<022
NONE
N/A
N/ A
40
<044
2,700
18
0.00
41
U188
3
45
0.00
42
<071
NONE
N/A
N/A
43
0010
2
49
0.00
44
<060
NONE
N/A
N/A
45
J220
<1
61
0.00
46
<002
NONE
N/A
N/A
47
<031
NONE
N/A
N/A
40
<052
NONE
N/A
N/ A
49
<083
NONE
N/A
N/A
50
<010
NONE
N/A
N/A
SOURCE: 3REPAREO FOR EPA bY DPRA, INC. (SURVEY SECTION. III3 DATA. 0L83350)
1^83 biennial report state PRO-ILE F3R THE STATE OF TEXAS
(TABLE 1 OF 3)
TOTAL NU13ER OF RCRA REGJlATED LARGE GENERATORS (SECTION lA): 1/
TOTAL quantity (TONS) OF REGULATED «ASTE GENERATED (SEC. IA/III8): 2/ 33.7b7,3R
PERCEN
RCRA REGJLATED TSO FACI-ITIES (SECTION II) NJiBER OF .«AST
FACI-ITIES managing only onsite GENERATED ^ASTE: 573 21.9^
FACI-ITIES MANAGING ONLY OFFSITE GENERATED wASTE: 55 0.00
facilities MANAGING RASTE GENERATED BOTH ON AND OFFSITE: 524 73.Oi
TOTAL TSO NUMBER AND PERCENT OF WASTE: U152 LOO
total quantity of RCRA REGULATED WASTE MANAGED (SECTION IIA/VI): 41,425*17
total quantity of RCRA REGULATED WASTE MANAGED (SECTION IIA/VI): 41,425*17
HANDLING METHOD
CODE
number uf
facilities
using method
(SECTION II)
HAZARDOUS WASTE QUANTITIES HANDLED
(SECTION VI) 3/
ONSITE offsite total
-(TONS )—•
CONTAINERS
SOI
3H4
4,240
7,668
11,908
STORAGE TAN7
HANDLING METHOD
CODE
NUMBER OF
FACILITIES
US ING METHOD
(SECTION II)
HAZARDOUS WASTE QUANTITIES HANDLED
(SECTION VI) 3/
ONSITE OFFSITE TOTAL
-(TONS )--•
CONTAINERS
SOI
12
634
1,461
2,115
STORAGE TAN 3
IB ) : 2/
24.995.D4
PERCEN
NUMBER
OF 1. A S T
54
9 9,33
7
D. 1=.
5
D.Ol
67
lOU
total quantity of RCRA REGULATED WASTE MANAGED (SECTION IIA/VI):
24.v7D.o8
handling method
CODE
NUMBER OF
FACILITIES
USING method
(SECTION II)
HAZARDOUS
ONSITE
WASTE QUANTITI
(SECTION VI)
OFFSITE
ES hanjled
3/
total
CONTAINERS
SOI
43
9,202
636
9,338
STORAGE TANKS
S02
6
820
28,243
29,067
OTHER STORAGE
SOS
0
0
0
0
TREATMENT TANKS
TOl
4
774
0
774
DTHER TREATMENT
T04
15
24,905,030
12,745
24,917,776
TOTA. STDR/TREAT
24,915,827
41,629
24,937,455
INJECTION WELLS
D79
0
0
0
0
LANDFILLS
080
0
0
0
0
LAND TREATMENT
081
3
3,069
0
3,D69
OCEAN DISPOSAL
082
0
0
D
0
SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS
083
0
0
0
0
WASTE PILES
S03
2
588
0
538
SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS
S04
5
9,559
0
9,559
SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS
T02
0
0
0
0
OTHER disposal
084
1
4
0
4
TOTAL disposal
13,220
0
13,220
incinerators
T03
1
0
0
0
RECYCl ING(OPTIONA.)
ROl
0
0
0
0
GRAND total:
24,929,046
41,629
24,970,675
SOURCE: PREPARED FOR EPA BY OPRA, INC. (SURVEY SECTIONS I. II. Ill AND VI
DATA. 0L3835O)
1/ SMALL QUANTITY GENERATORS WITH LESS THAN 13.2 TONS/YEAR (1000 RG/MDNTH)
ARE NDT REPORTED BUT GENERATORS WITH MISSING QUANTITIES ARE INCLUDED.
2/ STATE-ONLY HAZARDOUS WASTE MAY BE REPORTED IN ADDITION TD RCRA REGULATED
HAZARDOUS WASTE. THE LARGER QUANTITY IN SECTION lA AND III8 IS REPORTED Tu
MINIMIZE MISSING DATA.
3/ multiple COUNTING OF WASTES BY HANDLING METHOD MAY OCCUR.
4/ VIRGINIA'S REGULATED WASTE INCLUDES MAJOR QUANTITIES OF WASTEWATER, E.G., 99 PERCENT, THAT
WOULD LIKELY RECEIVE TREA'mENT EXEMPTIONS ELSEWHERE.
1985 biennial report STATE PROFI.E FOR TrIE STATE OF VIRGINIA
(TABLE 2 OF 3)
TOTAL QUANTITY OF
HAZARDOUS WASTE
TOTAL QUANTITY OF HAZARDUJS.
N ASTE
REPORTED SHIPPED
OUT
OF STATE
REPORTED SHIPPED FROM OTHER
states
(EXPORTS ) :
(IMPORTS): 1/
RECEIVING
TONS
states SHIPPING
TONS
STATE
SHIPPED
TD VIRGINIA
S H I ? P c D
ALABAMA
3,03S
ALABAMA
46
ARKANSAS
0
CONNECTICUT
1,42b
CONNECTICUT
15 L
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
160
GEORGIA
339
DELAWARE
20
Illinois
668
FLORIDA
91
INDIANA
1»A02
GEORGIA
577
KENTUCKY
186
uOUI SI ANA
1
LOUIS I ANA
573
MASSACHUSETTS
2,31h
MARYLAND
71,110
MARYLAND
A A2
MICHIGAN
3,A72
north CAROLINA
0,21 V
MISSOURI
19
new HAMPSHIRE
0
NORTH CAROLINA
3,176
NEW JERSEY
4,324
NER JERSEY
6,0A3
NEW YORK
94 1
NEW YORK
1,656
OHIO
430
OHIO
2,436
PENNSYLVANIA
792
3 ENNSYLVAN I A
7,612
RHODE ISLAND
1
SOUTH CAROLINA
6,557
SOUTH CAROLINA
33
TENNESSEE
31
TENNESSEE
633
TEXAS
0
TEXAS
222
WISCONSIN
9
WEST VIRGINIA
223
total
1D8,525
TOTAL
13,904
source: prepared
FOR
ERA BY OPRA, INC.
(SURVEY SECTION IV DATA. 0L83350)
1/ THE QUANTITIES REPRESENT THE TONS REPORTED BY SHIPPING STATES. TONS SHIPPED
HAY INCLUDE STATE-ONLY REGULATED HAZARDOUS RASTE. 3JANTITIIES RECIEVEO BY
EACH state NOT REQUESTED.
1985 biennial report STATE PROFI.E FOR T.NE STATE OF VIRGINIA
(TA3LE 3 OF 3)
^^ASTE STREAN GENERATION STATE RANKING CO'IPARED TO NATIONA^ RANKING (TOP FIFTY)
NATIONAL
RANK
^ A S T E
CODE
OUANTITY GENERATED
IN STATE (TONS)
state »jaste
C3JE rank
PERCENT OF
state TOTA.
1
0002
24,799,443
1
99.2 1
2
'lOMX
508
18
0.00
3
DOMX
7,829
6
0.03
A
0007
300
19
0.00
5
^ASTE GENERATED (SEC. lA/IlIB): 2/ ^39,21
RCRA REGULATED TSD FACI.ITIES (SECTION II)
facilities MANAGING ONLY ONSITE GENERATED ^ASTE:
facilities 'IANAGING only OFFSITE GENERATED WASTE:
FACIlITIES managing waste GENERATED BOTH ON AND OFFSITE:
TOTAL TSO NUMBER AND PERCENT OF WASTE:
PERCEN
NU'IBER OF /»AST
38 72.19
5 9,75
15 13.05
53 100
total 3UANTITY OF RCRA REGULATED WASTE MANAGED (SECTION IIA/VI): 5'-*2»07
HANDLING METHOD
CODE
NUMBER OF
FACILITIES
USING METHOD
(SECTION II)
HAZARDOUS
ONSITE
WASTE QUANTITIES
(SECTION V I ) - 3/
OFFSITE
handled
total
CONTAINERS
SOI
31
1,177
-( TONS )-
38,A73
39,550
STORAGE TANCTE: DO NOT IlKLi’ZE 'WASTES rPCW aT^F-STATE GSEPAGCFS CN 1^13 P.AGZ. DZSPOSZZZZt: ZF
WASTES .TO! ALl D^wTDL'G OTr-CP-STATE GZD^EPATCPS, IS ?£0LT3TEE IN SECTICN V.
A. In-state storage, treatonent, or disposal. Enter the quantities of hazardous
waste that were generated i.n-State and which -were finally treated or disposed of at
in-State facilities or that -were in storage in-State at the close of t'.e repcrtin.g
year. See list on page 2 for key to storage, treatnent, and disposal codes.
S tcrage:
Treatnent;
Dispcsa
SCI
Tons
TOl
Tors
D79
SC2
Tens
D80
SO 3
Tons
T03
Tons
C81
SO 4
Tors
T04
Tons
082
SOS
Tons
D83
-
084
Total:
Tors
Total:
Tors
Total;
B. Enter the quantity of hazardous waste reported shipped to in~State use, reuse, recycle
and/or reclamation facilities, if required of generators fcy State reporting
requirements. If unavailable, enter N/A. _
C-8
State
SECnCW IV. — DISPCSITICN CF GIUEPAnD HAIAPJXUS WASTES (oDnt.)
C. Enter the quantity o£ hazardous waste shipped to out-o£~State facilities,
ty individual State.
State Cuantitv State sTuantitr>^
_ _ Tens _ _ Tens
C-9
State
SZCnCN V. — TUTAL CCANTITY CF HAZAFTCUS WASTS TPEATED, STCRED, A^0 DISPCSEi:,
BY HANDLING
For each handling method, telow, enter the total quantity of regulated haoa
waste from all sources that was reported as being treated, stored, or disposed c
within tne State by tnat method during the reporting year.
PiANDLING hTTHCD TCTAL ?.£?C?TID
S borage:
501 - Container (barrel, drum, etc.) . . TCNS
502 TarJc. .
503 Waste Pile. .
504 Surface Inpoundinent. .
SC 5 Other.
Treatment:
TOl Tank .
T02 Surface Lttpoundment...
TO 3 Incinerator.
T04 Ot.her (Use for thermal, biological,
Aeriical, or physical treatment
not occurring in tanks, surface
LiTpcun(±nents, or incinerators.)
Disposal:
D79 Injection Well.
DSC Landfill...
C81 Land Application...
062 Ocean Disposal.
083 Surface Inpcundment
D84 Other.
C-10
-t: CCCE;
[Note: .at least ore sr.*
^i-ll ie reciuireo for aa
of 15 har.dlir.c rrettccs
Haz. Waste cn-aite
Nurt«r Quantities
off-site
Quantities
Haz. >::as te on-s i t e
Nurtoer Quantities
raan.ti
C-12
'M-
UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS-URBANA