Price, $2 per hundred. CHICAGO TRIBUNE CAMPAIGN DOCUMENT, Nc. 1. Coptiught Secured. Spirit of the Chicago Convention. EXTRACTS FROM ALL THE NOTABLE SPEECHES DELIVERED IN AND OUT OF THE NATIONAL “ DEMOCRATIC ” CONVENTION. A Surrender to the Rebels Advocated — A Disgraceful and Pusillasiimous Peace Demanded—The Federal Government Savagely Denounced and Shamefully Vilified, and not a word said against Hie Crime of Treason and Rebellion. This pamphlet contains the spirit of the Chicago “ Democratic”'Convention. If it contains no statements that if the proposed “Armistice and National Convention” expe¬ dients should fail, the democratic party would put down the rebellion, it is because, from first to last, no such statements were made. They would have been firebrands in the camp, and if uttered in the Convention, would have exploded the “democracy” into two conflicting factions. They uttered no word of approval of Abraham Lincoln, or disap¬ proval of Jefferson Davis. The blood and crimes, the hardships and deprivations, the infringements on personal liberty which we all endure, were not, during the entire sitting of the Convention, once charged to the rebellion or its leaders, but were by every speaker charged wholly, fiercely and relentlessly to the President of the United States, his officers and armies. Had the Convention been held in Richmond, Virginia, not a word need have been expunged. Further, the general spirit and tone of the Convention, so far from looking to a sup¬ pression of the present rebellion, w r as in favor of a new rebellion against the Government in the imagined contingency of “interference with the freedom of the ballot,” at the coming election. Very few of the speakers closed without an exhortation to prepare for a fight this fall. As nothing had occurred to indicate such an interference, and as it is in the power of those who met in this Convention to compel the Government to put forth ks armed force, by themselves inciting disturbance, it is to be presumed, that as in the case of the rebel prophecies of disunion four years ago, so now, what these prophets so unanimously foresee they have determined to bring to pass. Such a rebellion would re¬ unite them for the time in aim and purpose with their ancient party allies, Jefferson Davis and the Southern rebels. It would remove the seat of war from Atlanta, Mobile and Richmond, to Chicago, New York and Boston. It would set the people of the Northern Stat- s to cutting each other's throats, to send August Belmont’s Confederate stock up to par, and to establish’the independence of the Rebellion. Such was the tone and spirit of this so-called “Peace Convention” Vallandigham, the forerunner in the crime of Northern Rebellion, was the demi-god of the occasion. It was the tone and spirit of the New York anti-draft riots, where there was prodigious cheer¬ ing for McClellan—so here—and from the same class, imported in large numbers, for the occasion. They were not the peaceful citizens of this nation—not the class from which a genuine cry for peace would ever come. They were for peace with the rebels only because thev were for the rebels, for the slavery in behalf of which they rebelled, for the seces- siouism of Calhoun which led them into the rebellion, and for that gilded shim of this day—the name Democracy, which has thus far helped the rebellion on its wav. Sympa¬ thizing thus with the rebels, they demanded peace as a service to their friends—peace with the country’s enemies, and war against its defenders. In one breath they chaunted the evils of our present war, and in the next threatened a new rebellion. One moment they talked dolorously of the wounded and dying, and the next, threatened a free fight against us in our own streets, which would fill every American heart with shame and dye every American threshold with blood. They have done the rebels good service. Had they met, and on behalf of the democracy of the North, authoritatively informed the country that the seceders must submit to the Government or be crushed, the rebels would have been more discouraged and their return to the Union more hastened, than by the most sanguinary defeat on the battle-field. As it is, the emissaries of the rebellion in Can¬ ada telegraph, “Platform and Vice President satisfactory — Speeches vert satisfactory.” Republicans and Democrats who are not yet willing to surrender the Union, or to bring about another rebellion at the No:th to complicate a thousand fold the settlement of our present difficulties, are these men whose speeches are so very satisfactory to the rebels, worthy to be entrusted with the destinies of the country ? That there might be no dispute about the correctness of the extracts of speeches in the following pages, they were all copied from the columns of the Cbicag* Times , except a few passages taken from the Chicago Tribune's reports, which are credited to it. 2 \ The Chicago Times, of Aug. 25bh, stated tile: object of those attending the Conven¬ tion to be, to make it “The occasion of a demonstration of democratic power and earnestness which will strike terror to the hearts of our enemies.” We also learn from the same paper that “ The most distinguished democrats of the nation will address the people, and open the campaign in the democratic city of the West.” THE CLAMOR FOR A DISUNION PEACE. The general tone and sentiment of the twenty or thirty thousand democrats gathered from all parts of the Union, are thus described in the Chicago Times — McClbllau Pendleton Peace organ.' In front of the Court House, upon every street and alley in the vicinity of the Sherman and Tremont Houses, were assembled vast crowds of people— listening intently to the earnest oratory of speakers whose manner and delivery showed that their denun¬ ciations of the Administration—though they might be at times unpolished—in every instance proceeded directly from the heart. Peace was the cry of every man, woman and child, to be encountered on the streets. Peace was the watchword of every orator, and the responses of the immense crowd who listened, proved that the one predominant feel¬ ing in every heart was a desire for peace. yallanuioham’s first speech. The Chicago Times , of Aug 27th ? in its prelude to Yallandigham’s speech, alluding to the crowd gathered in the Court House Square, says: “ No wonder, then, that thousands of people were anxious, in the midst of the great crisis that is now passing, to hear the sound truths and immaculate teachings of the old democracy.” Vallandighaw said: “ There are two principal forms of government in the world. Governments founded on the idea of co¬ ercion, and governments founded on consent. The Declaration of Independence to which we owe our national existence—the charter in which is laid down the principles on which our government is founded— declares that all just governments rest on the consent o: the governed. Other governments, in other ages aa'l in other countries, have been founded on the idea of coercion, and look to bayonets, cannon, the sword, to enforce the edicts of the rulers as against the people, to maintain themselves against the wishes and sentiments of the people who are called their subjects. Governments founded on consent, on the other hand, rely on the instrumentalities of freedom, free speech, free press, free assemblages of the peo¬ ple, a free ballot box under which executive officers and legislators are elected to make laws and execute the laws so made, and those only. “ Such governments repudiate the idea of coercion and arms, relying only on the,coercion of law and of public opinion. This is the only coercion rightfully to be exercised in a government founded like ours on the consent of the governed.” Yallandigham here propounds the Four- ierite and Utopian idOa of a government based on moral suasion without the use of force. Because our government is founded on the consent of the governed, he infers that it must govern only with the consent of the disobedient. But while our written constitutions and our universal suffrage and fiee elections attest that our government derives all its powers from the consent of the governed, our penal laws, criminal courts, jails, penitentiaries, prisons and gal¬ lows equally show that one of the very powerswhich the government derives from the consent of the governed, is the power to coerce the disobedient and rebellious. wentwortu’s reply to vallandigham. Hon. John Wentworth, widely known as an olden-time Democrat of the days of Jackson, now a supporter of the Adminis¬ tration, at the close of Yallandigham’s speech, addressed the following triumphant refutation of his heresies to the same audi¬ ence. We quote from the Tribune report: “ But Vallandigham toll you that the Government could never be held together by coercive force, that power brought to apply on the unculy could never reduce them to obedience. Was there ever a greater heresy uttered by the mouth of man ! No coercion ! Why, gentlemen, the coercive power of Government is the only safety and salvation of society. No gov¬ ernment., no community can exist an hour without it. It was the weakness of the Articles of the old Confed¬ eration that they conferred no coercive power, and the statesmen of that day saw the pressing necessity of the new Constitution. Take to-day from munici¬ pal and governmental organization the power of coer¬ cion and society goes at once into anarchy and chaos. The weak would become the immediate prey of the strong, and might would indeed become right. I have been told that there are those who would disturb the quiet of the gathering in this city. We, the au¬ thorities of the city, coerce them into respect for law. Surely you should not denounce coercion. That glo¬ rious old war-horse of Democracy, General Jackson, from whose lips I inhaled the pure inspiration of De¬ mocracy, and at whose feet I received the first les¬ sons of political and governmental duty, was glo¬ riously free from this modern heresy. His celebrated proclamation against the nullifiers, in wh.ch ‘coer¬ cion’ gleamed and glistened in every line, will give him a name and an immortality in history, when the maligners and denunciators of his policy shall have been forgotten. I therefore stand for General Jack- son and against Vallandigham. Will you stand for Vallandigham and against General Jackson? ” Compare Vallandigbam’s language with Art. 1, Sec. 8, of the Constitution of the United States, authorizing the Government “to raise and support armies,” and “to provide for calling forth the militia to exe¬ cute the laws of the Union, suppress in¬ surrections and repel invasions.” Would he suppress a rebellion by an opinion? Yailandigham continues — “Much more is this true of a federative system. States leagued and united together to make one com¬ mon government made by independent sovereignties who have delegated certain portions of their power to their common agent for the purpose of their com¬ mon good. For three-fourths of a century such a government existed in the United States and still survives on parchment, but not in reality. Three years ago a party whose distinctive motto was free speech, a free press and free men, obtained power in this land. Soon after a civil war broke out and they began immediately to depart from the idea of a coer¬ cion of opinion or coercion of law, and resorted to a coercion of force; first, as against States, contrary to the very idea upon which our Federal Union was founded,’and in derogation of the fundamental prin- 3 ciples of all free government. Next— and naturally a 3 a legitimate consequence of the first violation — those who Obtained power through your suffrages be¬ gan the coercion of force against those who still ad¬ hered to the government and recognized them as agents of it.” Yallandigham here says the war broke out after Mr. Lincoln obtained power. Compare with this the following statement from the Southern history of the war writ¬ ten by Pollard, editor of the Richmond Examiner, a good “democratic” authority: “ On the incoming of the administration of Abra¬ ham Lincoln on the 4th of March, the rival Govern¬ ment of the South had perfected its organization; Fort Moultrie and Castle Tinckney had been cap¬ tured by the South Carolina troops; Fort Pulaski, the defense of Savannah had been taken; the arsenal at Mount Yerndrt 1 , Alabama, with 20,000 stand >of arms, had oeen seized by the Alabama troops; Fort Morgan in Mobile Pay had been taken ; Forts Jack- son, St. Philip and Pike, New Orleans, had been cap¬ tured by the Louisiana troops; the Pensacola navy- yard and Forts Barrancas and McRea had been taken, and the seige of Fort Pickens commenced; the Baton Rouge Arsenal had been surrendered to the Louisiana troops; the New Orleans Mint and Custom house-had been taken ; the Little Rock Arse¬ nal had been seized by the Arkansas troops; and on the 16th of February, General Twiggs had transferred the public property in Texas, to the State authori¬ ties.” Yallandigham also said — “ In one hour all the safeguards of the Constitution perished, arbitrary arrests commenced, spies became known throughout the land, their fluty being to watch the motions and report the conversations of every one the administration chose to suspect of that new crime of “ disloyalty” to that administration. In all this, to a large extent, they were unhappily sup¬ port ed ( by a vast majority of the people, silently and by active participation. The despotism of party aided the despotism of arbitrary power, the despot¬ ism of a majority sustained those who held the reins of government in trampling for a time upon the rights of minorities.” One of the safeguards of the Constitution is that which enables the President and Congress, “ when during rebellion or inva¬ sion, the public safety may require it,” to suspend the writ of habeas corpus, and thus to make what Yallandigham calls'“ ar¬ bitrary arrests.” Not only does the Con¬ stitution expressly authorize these-.abitrary arrests daring rebellion, by authorizing a suspension of the “ habeas corpus,” but Vallandigham admits that “ a vast majority of the people ” approved of them. If both the Constitution warrants, and tiib majority approve the “aroitrary arrests,” wil} Yallan¬ digham assert that neither the Constitution nor the'majority shall rule? Vallandigham asks— I. , ; “ Have yotl been secure in your persons and pro¬ perty, in your papers and your houses? Have you been free from arrests, from searches and from seizure?” . ' p a f u ,"7 > -i .; lot Bamn'jjJjo bun root! juIbi, The Constitution does not proyide,}Jib , ;j we shall be absolutely secure from s$ajfc]^ and seizures, but .only fj^om unreasonable searches ajid seizures, leaving thd,executive department of the government full liberty to make all reasonable searches ami seizures. In the same speech Yallandigham has the brazen effrontery to say : “ What was the condition of the country in the beginning of his (Lincoln’s) Administration? Con¬ trast it with the condition of things now. Then we had peace, now cruel war; then Union with all its blessings, now disunion with all its horrors; then the constitution maintained which our fathers pronounced, and we in our day and genera¬ tion too, as the consummation of human wisdom ; that constitution now lies prostrate under the heels of despotic power.” Yes, “ What was the condition of the country ” when committed to the Adminis¬ tration of Mr. Lincoln ? It was rent in twain by the party to which Yallandigham belongs. Mr Lincoln found two governments in full blast: Buchanan at the head of one and Davis at the head of the other. He found two con-titutions in force, the Federal and Confederate. He found eight States fully seceded, three more almost out, and two more preparing to follow the eleven elopers. He found half the territory of the United States in the hands of the Confederates, with their Capital established at Montgom¬ ery. He found this insurgent Government busy organizing an army and a navy, build¬ ing forts, drilling troops and collecting taxes. He found the armories and arsenals of the Federal Government plundered of their contents, and the treasury robbed of its last dollar. When Mr. Lincoln took the oath of office, the “ democratic party ” had scuttled and plundered the ship of State. The Union was dissolved as far as it was in the power of that party to dissolve it. When he entered the White House he found awaiting him three plenipotentaries from Jeff. Davis to negotiate a commercial treaty in behalf of the “ Southern Confederacy ! ” They did not deign to ask for recognition of rebel independence. They considered that al¬ ready settled. Such was the Union work of this “ glorious democratic ” party ; and now the leaders of the Northern wing ask to be restored to power, in order that they may complete their scheme of disunion by establishing a North-Western Confederacy on the ruins of the old Union. Yallandigham, with sublime impudence, actually arraigns the President for not hav¬ ing, against his most active resistance, re¬ stored the Union: “ I speak freely of the President as one who asks me for my vote, I tell him no, yon have nob dis¬ charged the duty for which you were elected. You have not so administered the government as to ad¬ vance its prosperity. You have not, as you promised us, restored the Union of these States, preserved the constitution given into your hands for keeping. Whose fault is it?” It is the fault of James Buchahan and the “democratic party ” who during the first five months of the rebellion assisted it by every means in their power, stripping the 4 North of 120,000 stand of arms to send to the rebels, and denying that the Govern¬ ment had any right but to submit to be coerced by rebels into its own dissolution and destruction. Vallandigham wants the war stopped: “If you would have peace,,abandon that idea of coercion, come back again to compromise and con¬ ciliation-; instead of war let us have reason, argu¬ ment, deliberation ; let us have the. assemblage of a convention of the States to consider this great ques¬ tion. Instead of the experiment of war let us have the experiment of peace. From military appliances let us look to the arts of peace, and the acquirements of statesmanship. Through these alone will you reach the highway of public prosperity.” How is peace to be secured except by conquering the rebellion ? Before a con¬ vention there must be an armistice. But Vallandigham did not inform his audience how the armistice is to be brought about, nor how a convention is to be legally con¬ stituted without the concurrence of tne States in rebellion. Does he propose to withdraw all our forces from the field now that, after a hard and exhausting campaign, they stand on the very margin of final suc¬ cess ? Does he propose that we shall abandon Kentucky, "Missouri, Tennessee, Northern Arkansas, Louisiana, West Vir¬ ginia, Maryland, Delaware? Must we sur¬ render back to the hands of the very men from whose bloody gripe they have just been rescued, Vicksburg, Port Hudson, Port Royal, Norfolk, Fortress Monroe, Forts St. Philip, Morgan, Gaines, Roanoke, Don- elson, Island No. 10, Memphis, St. Louis, Louisville, Wheeling, New Orleans, Balti : more, Nashville, Atlanta and Washington— in short, all places and territory south of Ma¬ son A Dixon’s line ? Must our fleets be with¬ drawn and the blockade raised in order that the rebels may sell their cotton and prepare themselves for a renewal of the war ? Yet this is what an armistice implies; this is what the rebel writers with one accord demand ; this is what their authori¬ ties make the single conditior. Jeff. Davis declared, in the most emphatic manner, to Colonel Jaquess, that he would not consent to negotiate until the independence of the Confederacy had been recoguized. “ Say to Mr. Lincoln, from me, that I shall at any time be pleased to receive proposals for peace on the basis of our independence. It will be useless to ap¬ proach me with any other.” An armistice, while it lasts, is, in effect, a concession of rebel independence, and an acknowledgment that the Union is dis iolved. But let us suppose this difficulty sure mounted, stopped,—what sort of a convert tion does Vallandigham propose to hold ? One chosen according to the mode pre¬ scribed by the constitution, or by some oth- > er method ? The only possible convention that could authoiDatively settle any dispute, must be assem-bled in the mode prescribed by the Constitution itself. Does any copperhead deny this ? By Article V, of the Constitu¬ tion of the United States, it is provided that: “ The Congress .... on application of the legis¬ latures of two-thirds of the several States, shall call a convention for proposing amendments which . . . shall be valid to all intents and purposes as parts of this constitution, when ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States, or by conventions in three-fourths thereof, as the one or the other mode of ratification may be proposed by the Congress.” Congress cannot, it will be seen, of it3 own motion, call a Convention, which it can do only when moved thereto by two-thirds of all the Sta'e legislatures; that is, of all the States, rebel as well as loyal. But such an application would be an ac¬ knowledgment by these States that they were a part of our Federal Union, and owed fealty to our constitution. Is it to be be¬ lieved that the rebel States are willing to do this? And if so, what need of a Conven¬ tion ? They are already in the Union by their own consent, which is all that we re¬ quire. FERNANDO WOOD’S PEACE SPEECH. Fernando Wood insisted on stopping the war and making peace. A Disunion peace, of coursej; the rebels will voluntarily make no other. Now, my friends, I counsel peace. [Cheers.] I counsel peace in the Democratic party that we may restore old rights to this distracted land. We must have a union of the party that we may have a Union of the States. [Cheers.] Planting our¬ selves firmly upon a peace platform, [that’s right, and cheers,] with a candidate pledged to restore peace and harmony, [cheers,] some great lion-hearted Democrat, the Union shall and will be restored. [‘ Bully for you,’ and loud cheers.] Now, my friends, we have had war, we have had administration, desolation, emancipation and dam¬ nation. [Loud cheers.] And now we propose to apply the remedy—to administer the antidote—peace. We call for peace. God of our fathers, Gnaut us peace, [Amen,] peace in our hearts, and at thine altars ; peace on the red waters and on our blighted shores ; peace for be- leagured cities and the hosts that wait around them ; peace for the widows and fatheriess, for the sinning and sinned against. Grant us peace, O God, for all, and for a distracted, torn and bleed¬ ing land. Speed the great time of peace. [Im¬ mense cheers.] SPEECH OF A CATHOLIC PRIEST. Rev. J. A. McMa3ter8, a Catholic priest, and editor of the Freeman's Journal —a lead¬ ing Catholic paper of New York, made the following infamous speech. It is filled with falsehood and bitterness for his Govern- sp&eut and love and respect for slave-driving rebels: Peace is the magic charm that has drawn you together. From your farms, from your workshops, and your counting rooms, you have seen the wide desolation of war. The groans of the dying and the 5 wailing of the bereaved have reached your ears and moved your hearts, and you come to pour the balm of peace into their bruised and lacerated hearts. Your mission is a high, and holy, and a glorious one. As a public journalist I was one of the first to cry out against the nefarious scheme of wholesale murder involved in the war. I am proud to say that time has vindicated the justness of my position. Show me a War Democrat to-day and I will show you a shoddy Abolitionist in disguise. A man who is in favor of this unnatural war, insults the holy name of Democracy when he claims a place in its organi¬ zation. He is a Judas, and should be cast out as an enemy to humanity and to God. War and blood, and rapine, and murder, is the legitimate business of the Lincoln minion. We wash our hands clean of all participation in it., r _j But we are told that we must be forced to carry arms in this unholy fight. Soon the net is to be drawn that will gather In its half million rnoye to feed the insatiable thirst for blood of the Negro God^ Let us demand a cessation of the sacrifice until the people shall pronounce tbeir great and emphatic verdict for peace, and let the tyrant understand that the demand comes from earnest men gnd must be respected. We are often called the “ Unterrified.” I trust you are. I hope that your nerves may be of steel, for there is a day of trial coming, and you must meet it. There will be Provdst Marshals who will sneak into your family circles and spy into your domestic relations, and perhaps cast you into an Abolition bastile. Then I trust to find you 1 unter¬ rified ’ indeed. Let not the threats of bayonets or greenbacks of this Heaven-cursed Administration frighten you; but if you are to die, die as becomes men, in a struggle for your rights; live not as be¬ comes slaves. In the platform of the Convention to-morrow we shall have embodied the glorious and sublime doctrine of peace. If. you will sustain the platform, as. I know you will, upon our country will dawn th« brightest era this nation has ever seen, and the angels of God will come down to earth to bless the name of Democracy. senator Richardson’s slanders. Senator Richardson, of Illinois, spoke at Bryan Hall on Friday evening, Aug. ‘26th. W e extract from the Times the following: “ To re-elect Mr. Lincoln is to accept four years more of wax, four years more of trouble, of disaster, • of woe, of lamentations, of ruin to the country. [Applause.] To defeat 31 r. Lincoln, to accept the nominee of the Chicago Convention, [cheers,] is to bring peace and harmony and concord and union to these States. [Loud applause.] ” “But these Republicans say they would be very much disgraced if they were to propose terms of settlement with rebels with amts in their hands. These people with arms in tlieir hands are the very people I want to settle with. I am not afraid of a man if he has no arms.” buA .euniad nannii! 1 "tu hi >8 i>t*tn-*H RICHARDSON CALLS OCR SOLDIER8 HIRELING HESSIANS. “ Fellow citizens, I ask you to turn back in htetory and tell roe where it was that ever hired soldiers con¬ quered a peace. When the Goth and Vandal over ran Rome, and the people turned out from motives of patriotism and love of country, they drove them back. For a hundred years the Goth and Vanda) attempted to overrun Rome. But after a while the people became enervated, and they hired, as we are hiring now, the soldier to fight their battles, and they were conquered. I might-run this paral'el through history, but I will give but one other example. Dtxr- ing the American Revolution, when vhe people of England desired to prevent this country from sepa¬ rating from them, and when they turned out, their owti people into the army th y took Boston, New York, Philadelphia, Baltimore, Charleston, the Ches¬ apeake, and in fact the entire coast. But when the feeling changed towards us, and the King of England was compelled to hire Hessians to come here and fight us, we whipped them. You cannot win victories with hired soldiers. They must be moved by a higher motive and purer patriotism than the mere love of the dollar they receive for their services.” The gallant and patriotic soldiers of the Union are here defamed as “hilling Hes¬ sians;” their defeat predicted and desired, and the triumph of the rebels taken for granted. “ Out of the fullness of the heart the mouth speaketh.” At the very moment this old rebel sympathizer was proclaiming that the rebellion could not be subdued, one- half of it had been crushed and the residue was tottering, notwithstanding the aid and comfort given to the insurgents by such men as the speaker. DEWITT, OF NEW YORK, STIGMATISES THE BRAVE POTOMAC ARMY. Mr. Dewitt, of New York, addressed a crowd from the balcony of the Sherman House. “ Speaking of the achievements of our armies, the speaker said, when that grand army that had crossed the Rapidan under Gen. Grant had failed, what could be expected of an army df conscripts, hirelings and negroes? [Cheers and cries of “ Nothing.”] Men taken from new emigrants just arrived upon bur soil; men torn unwillingly from, their homes and forced into the ranks, and untiitored Africans — these were the men before Richmond and Petersburg, and what could be expected of them, when a grand army of chosen men had failed to accomplish good.” A HISSING REPTILE. S. S. Cox, who is widely known to be the •most intimate and confidential friend of Geo. B. McClellan, among political men, and next to Belmont, the leading w■ire-puller for his nomination, made the fo lowing speech as reported in the Chicago Times : “Senator Cox being introduced,.said he did not want to use any harsh language towards Old Abe, [cries of “ give it to him,”] He Ivad attempted in his own city, a few weeks since, to show in a very quiet way, that Abraham Lincoln had deluged the country with blood, created a debt of four thousand millions of dollars, sacrificed two millions of human lives, and filled the land with grief, and mourning. A pious man who had listened attentively to his remarks, sang out, ‘ G—d!$j- d him.’ He did not agree with his pious friend. He hoped God would have mercy ou Abraham Lincoln, but at the November election the people would damn him to immortal infamy. [Immense.cheering,] One of our friends, Judge Hall, had been at rested in Missouri a short time since because he happened to say that Jefferson Davis was no greater enemy to the Constitution than Lincoln, lie (the speaker) would say it boldly; let them arrest him. [Cheers and cries, “ they dare not.”] The speaker concluded by recapitulating the Infa¬ mous actions of the. President, showed how he had exercised fraud to overpower and defeat the purposes of loyal people, and said Republicans, Wade and Davis, not democrats, were his accusors. lie ex¬ horted the people to join in the grand determination to remove the despot from the place which he was unfit to fill.” The report of the Chicago Tribune, adds the following; “ For less offenses than Mr. Lincoln hud been guilty ! of, the English peop e had chopped off the head of the first Charles. In his opinion, Lincoln and Davis • ought to be brought to the same block together. The other day they arrested a friend of his, a member of Congress, from Missouri, for saying in private conver¬ sation, that Lincoln was no better than Jeff. Davis. He was ready to say the same now here in Chicago. Let the minions of the administration object, if they dare.” “He asked, did they want the whole country mort¬ gaged for the freedom of the negro ? ” He would be entirely willing to mortgage the whole country to pay Jeff. Davis’ debt ! incurred in securing the slavery of the negro. “ If this war was to continue four years longer, where would we bring up ? ” He might have asked, if this war should continue one year longer, where would the i Rebels bring up ? STAMBAUGH PREFERS DISUNION TO THE FREE- j DOM OF THE SLAVES. j “ Mr. Siambaugh, a delegate from 6hio, said, ‘that if he was called upon to elect between the freedom of the nigger and disunion and separation, he should choose the latter. [Cheers.] Bayo¬ nets and cannon, and above all, negro emancipation, : cannot conquer a permanent peace.’ His plan for ] the solution cf these difficulties, was an armistice, and an arrangement for a joint Convention, in which to talk over and arrange all family grievances. He was certain that iD Ohio, the entire community were in favor of peace.” HE ADVOCATES REPUDIATION. “One reason why the Democrats shou’d support the candidate of the Convention, whoever he might be, was, that they might search hell over and they could not find a worse President than Abraham Lin¬ coln. When this war is over, he would not give a pinch of snuff for the 5.20s and the 10.40s now hoard¬ ed by the rich.” JUDGE ALEXANDER WANTS AN ARMISTICE. “ Judge Alexander, of Kentucky, was then intro¬ duced. After a few introductory remarks, he said, “ was the Constitution to be restored by the party in power? [Cries of ‘ No, no.’] Was it to be restored by a continuance of the war? [Cries of ‘No.’] Since they could not do it by shedding blood, he would ask how were they to obtain peace? They had tried the bayonet and failed, and they would now try the ballot because with it they would drive out Lincoln and his minions. In order to stop the war they must have an armistice, to be followed by a con¬ vention of all the States. No war had ever been j settled except by compromise, from the time when Moses fouj/ht. the Amalekites down to the present 1 day. If they did not believe this, then they must beiieve that the physical powers were superior to the meDtal powers, and if such were the case, then they t,ad better leave the abode of civilization, and go forth to the wild prairies to live. [Cheers ] He could tell them that Kentucky would stand by the nominee of the Convention. [Loud and prolonged cheeriDg.] He felt assured that the proper platform would be submitted, and would contain a plan for an armistice and a Convention of States. Thep their grief and sorrows would pass away, and the people j would cry, “Let us have peace.’’ [Cheers] He concluded by relating a couple of anecdotes which created much laughter. One of them had reference to the opinion of a Kentucky gemleman who thought that as Mr. Lincoln was so fond cf the negro, he should have one of the slain ones skinned and made j into a pair of moccasins for bis daily wear,” COL. CARR, ON BUCHANAN AND LINCOLN. Col. Carr was then introduced. He said he con¬ sidered this one of the proudest days in American history. Between three and four years ago the Re¬ publican party had met to nominate a person for Pre¬ sident, and selected a citizen of Illinois. It was not the first time a King had been deposed and a fool put in his place. In former times kings had kept fools to keep from wearying, but this was the first country that, had elected a fool to reign over it. [Chesrs and laughter.] NO DIFFERENCE BETWEEN A WAR DEMOCRAT AND AN ABOLITIONIST. Hon. Mr. Trainor, of Ohio, (President of the State Convention last year,) said: If you wish for peace, great, glorious peace, Vote for the nominee of the Democratic Convention. A. bloody war has been waged, not for the liberty of the white man, but for elevating him to equality with the negro. At the first call 75,000 were called. They proved insufficient. Next 300,000 more; and some 2.000,000 Jives have been lost in this war. Now the President has called for 500,000 more. Shall he have them ? [“ No, no,” from the audience.] The demo¬ cratic party want peace; for if we don’t get it we will have to submit to a military despot. He would urge the people to be freemen, and hurl Abraham Lincoln and his minions from power. THERE IS NO DIFFERENCE BETWEEN A WAR DEMOCRAT AND AN ABOLITIONIST. THEY ARE BOTH LINKS IN THE SAME' SAUSAGE, MADE OUT (IF THE SAME DOG. Should resist¬ ance be offered at the polls to prevent our suffrage, let that resistance be met with resistance. [To a question.] The South will gladly come back if Abra¬ ham Lincoln be hurled from power. He has killed more men by his proclamations than the rebel Gen¬ eral Lee. Why don’t the “ South ” pay that it will come back if Lincoln be “ hurled from assertions made? SATURDAY, August 27. Tim Chicago Times says, of the meetings held on Saturday evening, which were large- | ly attended as well bv the peace svmpathiz- 1 ers and “ plug tig-lie s” of the whole country, as by those curious to hear what the friends of peace with the rebels, and war with the government, had to say — “ The demonstration last night was not a meeting merely; it was a whole constellation of meetings. The grand centre of the city—Randolph, Clark, Washington, and La Salle streets, in the vicinity of the Court-House—and the Oourt-House Square, pre¬ sented one solid mass of human beings. And these were independent of the crowds that had assembled in other parts of the city — in the Democratic Invin¬ cible Club Hall, in Bryan Hall, and in the remote streets. From 7 until 10 o’clpck, there were continual, unbroken columns pouring from all directions to¬ wards the Court-House and the adjacent thorough¬ fares . During the entire evening there were, at all times, five ;peakers holding forth to thousands of assembled citizens, and almost within the sound of each other’s voices. The number of people composing the grand nucleus of the entire assemblage, was at no time during the evening estimattd at less than forty thou¬ sand, even by the most scrupulous.” VIEWS OF A NEUTRAL KENTUCKIAN. Gon. Leslie Coombs thinks our Southern brethren drew the sword- 7 % “ Alas, that I should live to see these evil days ; to think that our southern brethren should draw the sword ! I told them in the beginning of this strife of sections, that they were throwing -fire-balls to am- , bitious devils that, would turn theru on our own house, and they would not care a d—n if it were set on fire. [Laughter.] But, sir, allow me to say I shall live — old as I am—L shall live to see this strife ended ; I shall live to see the bonds of national fraternity again united ; I shall live to see this paper-money abated ; this gunpowder currency, which I would not use for wadding tokdla prairie chicken, abated, and turned into gold and silver.” [Applause.] Gen. Coomb?, tired of the war and a little scared, said: “ I am tired of this war. I am tired of the lamen¬ tations in my ears all around me. I tell yon, gentle- men, you know nothing of the horrors of this war here If you could 1 see the guerillas pouring into your villages and every part of the State, and citizens flying, as I have seen them in my town, Lexington, you would know something of the horrors of this war. And when I but just now left my home, my town was guarded by negroes, no white man left with the privilege of a gun in his hand. I am not a slave¬ holder. Eight years ago I set mine free. I emanci¬ pated them myseif, for I did not intend to let any other man emancipate them. [Applause.] So I left my family in the hands of emancipated slaves, for my negroes would not leave me. I tell you, I have seen those (democratic) guerillas charging down through town when it was rather delicate looking.out of the windows, because you could not know where a bullet m'ght be coming.” His advice cuts both ways. “ We read in ancient history of the siege of the great city of the Hebrews, and that whilst Titus was daily battering down their walls, the factious Jews were quarreling among themselves every night. But for God’s sake, dou’t let us be like the Jews quarreling amongst ourselves, and devouring one another in these times of the extremity of our imper¬ iled institutions of freedom.” He then gives a piece of advice which in itself would abolish slavery. “ Let each man kiss his own wife and nobody elee’s wife, and let each woman whip her own children.” This is all the abolitionists have ever asked. It would put an end to the “ sum of all villanies,” stop mulatto breeding and give peace to the Union, and perpetuity to free institutions. THE OLD THREAT. Hon. H. S. Orton, of Wisconsin, repeats the old Southern threat: “ Elect us or we ? ll split you ” “ The fanaticism of the North conjoined with the fanaticism of the South has run its course, and it is for us, the conservative masses of the United States, to say whether it shall longer prevail, or whether the government, the constitution and the Union shall be preserved and resume their sway. On this con¬ vention and the one to fallow it, hangs the fate of this great Republic. Bearit in mind and recollect it well and solemnly that on these conventions rests the fate of this Union. And what is involved in that? To an American everything—life, property, all the en- dearrr ents of home and society—everything that Americans hold dear. In Wisconsin Lincoln has no party left, except himself and his officers and satraps, — that is all there is left of them. I pledge you my word it is all that is left in the State of Wisconsin—the collectors of the revenue, the assessors and their dependents, are all the strength that Abe Lincoln has in these free Sta’es. And they are to rule over us. Are you going to submit.to it ? ” [Cries of * no.’] Like Mark Antony over the dead body of Cassar he “ would not stir up their minds and hearts to sudden mutiny.” “ I do not countenance forcible resistance to any law. Iam an advocate of law. In I860 I did not have the honor to vote for that great and good man whose spirit now rests in God, Mr. Douglas [Cheer?] ; but I voted for Bell and Everett, and to-day I don’t know which of them is the best off. Bell has gone over to the secessionists, and Everett gone over to the abolitionists, and I am without candidates to-day, and 1 don’t know which of them has gone into the worst company.” [Laughter and cheers.] Neither he nor the South will return to the old Union if slavery is destroyed. V J “ You want the constitution, the rights of ’.he States, and a return of the old Union. Where is the old Union? A schoolboy’s tale, the wonder of an hour ! We want a return to it with the constitution, but not otherwise. After every right established by our fathers was broken down and destroyed would I return to it? Or would the South return to it ? ” ‘Resistance to the draft will save slavery — save the South — and set the sun, mobn • and stars back in the firmament once more. • “ Now is the time to return to the right path. Under iho pressure of the draft—and God bless the draft, it is the best argument that has ever been addressed to the American people. It proves that we have touched bottom, we have got a realizing sense that we have got nearly to the last ditch, the last man, and the last dollar. Under the pressure of the time stop and save your goven ment ; for if it is gone now it is gone forever, and there is a future of darkness and gloom. The stars of heaven are blotted out, the moon will refuse to shine, the sun will rise no more in the fair firmament of the Amer¬ ican Republic ! ” VUIAT YOUNG MORRIS KETCHUM SAID. _ ’ • • v . Q ;’» C t Y • * ' J U f) Y « * Young Ketchum of New York, son of the pro-slavery banker, had no confidence in democratic principles or professions, and said: “ Now, gentlemen, we want our man for two reasons. In the first place the people of the city of New York are sick of platforms. We have not had j a platform for eight years given to us by either side which has been maintained aftej- its adoption. And though we approve of the motto, * principles, not men,’ yet we feel that we have been so often de¬ ceived that we now want a man who shall be a princi¬ ple in himself, and whose principles we are willing to support. We want to elect a man who will say to the South, 1 Come back, we will restore to you every constitutional privilege, every guarantee that yon ever possessed; your rights shall no longtr be invaded ; we will wipe out the emancipation procla¬ mation ; we will sweep away this confiscation act, all that we ask of you is to come back and live with us on the old terms. We are both tired and weary, and want to live together again,’” But suppose the rebels refuse to ccrae back on any terms, — they have a million times declared they never would voluntarily return. What then ? Has all the fighting to be done over again ? Young Ketchum ! was candid enough to state the consequence 8 of allowing the Union to be divided. He said : “ * This Union must and shall be preserved.’ God Almighty set the seal of Union on this land when he poured the mighty waters of that great river through this valley of the Mississippi down to the Gulf of Mexico. Tliis was his seal that the land should never be divided. You may separate to-morrow and recognize them as an independent nation, but let me tall you that before five or ten years have rolled over your heads, you would have the same war, bloody, bitter, and everlasting as now.” This is what Ketchum said. Now listen to what Jeff Davis says. In his late con¬ versation with Col. Jacques and James Ret Gilmore, he said: “ I tried all in my power to avert this war. I saw it' coming, and for twelve years [it was not Lincoln, then, that caused the war,] I worked night and day to prevent it, but I could not. The North was mad and blind ; it would not let us govern our¬ selves, and so the war came, and now it must go on, till the last man of this generation falls : in hi3 track, and his children seize his musket and fight his battles, unless you acknowledge our rights of self- government. We are not fighting for slave¬ ry. We are fighting for independence — and that or extermination we will have.” . What good will “wiping out the emanci¬ pation proclamation,” and “ sweeping away the confiscat : on acteffect towards a res¬ toration of the Union? “ But. tell me, said Davis, are the terms you have named — emancipation, no confiscation, and univer¬ sal amnesty — the terms which Mr. Lincoln author¬ ized you to offer us ? ” “No, sir; replied Col. Jacques, Mr. Lincoln did not authorize me to offer you any terms. But I think both he and the Northern people, for the sake of peace, would assent to some such conditions.” “ But, replied Mr. Davis, amnesty, sir, applies to criminals. We have committed no crime. Confisca¬ tion is of no account unless you can enforce it. And emancipation! You have already emancipated nearly a million of our slaves-r-and if you will take care of them, you may emancipate the rest. I had a few when the war began. 1 was of some use to them ; they never were of any to me. Against their will you ‘ emancipated ’ them, and you may ‘ emancipate ’ every negro in the Confederacy, but we will be free ! We will govern ourselves. We will do it if we have to 3ee every Southern plantation sacked, and every Southern city in flames.” “ Well, sir, said Col. Jacques, be that as it may, if I understand you, the dispute between your Gov¬ ernment and ours is r^rrowed down to this: Union or disunion.” “Yes; or to put it otherwise: Independence Or subjugation.” “ Ihen the two Governments are irreconcilably apart. They have no alternative but to fight it out.” BITTER DENUNCIATION OF THE PRESIDENT, ENCOURAGEMENT TO REBELS. Mr. Romeyn, of New York, said : “ Mr. Lincoln has vi lated the rights of the States and the sacred rights of man. He proposes to lib¬ erate the slaves of the South and turn them upon the Nprth to live in idleness and vagrancy, and become paupers and burthens to society. He refuses to al¬ low the Southern, States their constitutional rights even if they returned to the Union. The South will never submit to such terras, nor would the North un¬ der similar circumstances.” What constitutional right did the “ South ” not enjoy before secession ? Is it a violation of the rights of the States for the President to enforce the Constitution and the laws ? REED OPPOSES THE DRAFT. Hon. Mr. Reed, of Indiana, was in favor of peace at the South, but would rather have war in the North than a draft; He advised open and aboveboard resistance to the draft. If Lincoln and his satraps attempted to enforce it, blood would flow in our streets, and it would be right it should flow. Lincoln was already damned to all eternity, and he did not know if even this iniquitous! measure would materially affect the estimation in which the people, held him. He had taken considerable pains to inform himself of the opinion of the people in relation to tliis draft, and he found it altogether condemned. There was hut one opinion in this matter, and that was, that if the draft was not enforced there would he peace. Mr. Lincoln had tried war for three years ; he had slain our peo¬ ple by countless thousands, and blood enough had been shed to float the largest ship of war in the world. He said we might as well make up our minds to the fact that it was impossible to whip the South, and then asked, would the people consent that their best and noblest men should be swept down by the relentless conscript law? No, a thousand times no, was his answer. He further continued his inflamma¬ tory appeals concerning the draft, and advised open and associated resistance to its enforcement. He advised his hearers to shoot down those who would enforce the draft; to insist upon the right of the writ of habeas corpus ; to resist to the bitter end the attempt to make the military power superior to the civil, and to openly arm themselves that they might be prepared for horrible contingencies. Mr. Reed’s attention is affectionately di¬ rected to the following democratic epistle: “ Headquarters Army of tbk Potomac, 1 October 2T, 1862. f “ Your Excellency is aware of the very great re¬ duction of numbers that has taken place in most of the old regiments of this command, aud how neces¬ sary it is to fill up these skeletons before taking them again into action. I have the honor, there¬ fore. to request that the order to fill up the old regiments with drafted men may at once be issued. GEO. B. McCLF.LI.AN, Major General Commanding. His Excellency, the President.” The Chicago limes tfyps, introduces its re¬ port of Rynders’ speech : “the invincible club. “ At an early hour in the evening the hall of the Democratic Invincible Club, corner of Clark and Monroe streets, was filled with a most enthusiastic audience to,listen to an address on the great ques¬ tions of the day by Captain Daiah Rynders, the well known President of the Empire Democratic Club, New York.” The chairman of the Invincible Club in¬ troduced him in the following terms: “ He had now much pleasure in introducing to the meeting.Captain Isaiah Rynders, [cheers]—a gentle- I man well known, and who had done such good ser ¬ vice in the cause of democracy. [Loud applause.] * RYNDERS 1 FREE SPEECH, Capt. Rynders, thus eulogized the rebels, denounced his government, slandered the 9 friends of freedom and Union, and clamored for a disunion peace : He had always been for peace, even before the first gun was fired. He had denounced the unholy cru¬ sade against our southern brethren even before the first regiment was moved Southward. He saw the inevitable result, of war — tne waste, and blood and tears it would entail, and to this day he could say, and he said it with pride, that he had never said one word against the brave, the noble, the generous, the chivalrous people of the South, and lie trusted in God he never would. Nearly half a million of those noble men had fallen in bloody graves, but they remain unconquered. [Cheers ] They can never be subdued, as they are a part of our own flesh and blood. [Loud applause.] Millions more of men may be torn from their homes to fall in the fight, but the task will fail, as it oueht to do. The war is carried on for the nigger, and in God’s name let the Abolitionists fight it out. We shall nominate our candidate on Monday, and place him squarely upon a platform of peace, and sweep the nation like a whirlwind. Those who count upon a division of the ^Democratic party will be disap¬ pointed . We are one and all for peace, and with this magic word upon our banner we shall sweep over the course, and roll into oblivion the black, negro-loving, negro-hugging worshippers of old Abe Lincoln. HE IS SOLICITOUS FOR A FREE FIGHT I will tell you, my Republican friends, I know you have been pretty supercilious, you have been defiant, you have been outrageous ; but I know I speak the heart and voice of the old war-worn democracy when I say ti at next fall we intend to have a free election, free ballot, free assemblage together, or tho freest fight that ever took place in this country. [Tre¬ mendous cheering.] DENIES THAT THE REBELS ARE TRAITORS. “After three y ears of despotism he stood before them a free man—before a free people. With refer¬ ence to the remark which he had referred to, he would now speak after the digression he had just made. It was a remark he did not approve of. He had heard one of the speakers state that the people of the South were traitors, which were harsh words, as the people of the South were as brave and chiv¬ alrous a people as were ever put on this earth. [Cheers.] He had regretted that they took the step they did for the settlement of their grievances, for they had great grievances. He was sorry they took these steps, ami his advice was to stay in the demo¬ cratic party, and they would right their grievances. They, however, seemed to think differently, and he was sorry for it. Never h id one word come from his lips against them, and he hoped his lips would be sealed when he did injustice to a brave, noble, and chivalrous people. [Applause.] ” SUFFERING BRETHREN IN CAMP DOUGLAS. “The abolitionists now thought more of the colored man than the free white man in the East. They could not see the white man, suffering from want and destitution, but they have to look to the colored man in Alabama arid Louisiana. They could see them, but not the misery of the white man. They could not look to Camp Douglas nor to Fort Lafayette and see white men languishing in bondage. [Cheers ] They have no sympathies for these men, because, in the celebrated language of the clergyman at Beaufort, * he invariably has a white skin.’ “ He next alluded in withering terms to Lincoln’s apology to the Emperor Napoleon relative to the res¬ olution which passed the House of Representatives regarding the carrying out of the Monroe doctrine.” Ry nders was not then aware that the de¬ mocracy had already been passed over to Belmont, the Rothschilds, and the other holders, not only of Jeff. Davis’ debt, but of Maximilian’s, and that their platform would repudiate the Monroe doctrine altogether. GEORGE F. TRAIN IN FAVOR OF DISSOLVING THE UNION, AND UNITING PART OF THE NORTH WITH THE SLAVE STATES. “The South and West had always been firm friends. Did we in the West produce this war? We are not now the enemies of the South. The West and the South will eventually close up, New York and Penn¬ sylvania will follow, and finally we will be all together again, except puritanical, fanatical, New England. She will be left alone, and all the niggers will be driven within her boundaries.” MONDAY, August 29. The Convention was called to order by August Belmont, Chairman of the National Democratic Committee, financial agent of the Rothschilds, and the representative in that capacity of the Confederate debt. He represents the money that pays the rebel armies. He said : “ In your hands rests, under the ruling of an all¬ wise Providence, the future of this Republic. Four years of misrule, by a sectional, fanatical and cor¬ rupt party, have brought our country to the very verge of ruin.” Where he says “ couptry,” the people will of course read “ rebellion and Confed¬ erate bonds.” “ The past and present are sufficient warnings of the disastrous consequences which would befall us if Mr. Lincoln’s re-election should be made possible by our want of patriotism and unity. The inevitable results of such a calamity must be the utter disinte¬ gration of our whole political and social system amidst bloodshed and anarchy, with the great prob¬ lems of liberal progress and self-government jeop¬ ardized for generations to come.” He thinks the cause of the rebellion was the failure of northern democrats to agree with their southern brethren. “ Let us at the very outset of our proceedings bear in mind that the •dissensions of the last Democratic- Convention were one of the principal causes which gave the reins of government into the hands of our opponents, and let us beware not to fall again into the same fatal error.” He tells them to sacrifice all their honest convictions, if they have any, but says noth¬ ing about “Confederate bonds.” “ W T e must bring at the altar of our country the sacrifice of our prejudices, opinions and convictions, however dear and long cherished they may be, from the moment they threaten the harmony and unity of action so indispensable to our success/’ He nominated for temporary chairman, Mr. Buchanan’s shadow, and the defender of the rights of the rebellion and anti-coercion- ism in the Senate of 1860—Hon. William Bigler, of Pennsylvania. He said: “ The termination of democratic rule in this coun¬ try was the end of peaceful relations between the States a&d the people.” In other words, when the democratic party, though grown so sectional that it could hardly carry a single free State, still carried the general election, the republican 10 party submitted. ]}ut when the democratic party was beaten, it rebelled and went in for a free fight in every State which it con¬ trolled. Well may democrats boast, that with the end of their power ended peace, if they themselves made the overthrow of their power a cause of rebellion. “ The elevation of a sectional party to authority at Washington, the culmination of a long indulged aDd acrimonious war of crimination and recrimina¬ tion between extreme men at the North and South, was promptly followed by dissolution and civil war. And in the progress of that war even tHte bulwarks of civil liberty have been imperiled and the whole fabric brought to the very verge of destruction.” The only “bulwark of civil liberty” which has been suspended is the “ habeas cor- pis” But it is the Constitution of the United States, not the Republican party platform, which suspends habeas corpus dur¬ ing rebellion. The rebels, therefore, are re¬ sponsible for the suspension. “And now at the en of more than three years of a war unparalleled In modern times for its magnitude and foy its barbarous desolations,—after more than two millions of men have been called into the field on our side alone,—after the land has been literally drenched in fraternal blood, and wailings and lamen¬ tations are heard in every corner of our common country—the hopes of the Union, our cherished ob¬ ject, are in no wise improved.” This is grossly false. McClellan, in his Harrison Landing letter, says, that were “the armies of the Confederate States thor¬ oughly defeated,the political structure which they support would soon cease to exist.” Gen. Grant, who is the best judge of the military situation, says, that with 100,000 more men‘he could “thoroughly defeat” the rebel armies. According to Grant and McClellan we not only have improved our hopes of Union, but have it fully in our power to realize them within a few months by a moderate reinforcement of our armies. “ The men now in authority, through a feud which they have long maintained with violent and unwise men at the South, because of a blind fanaticism about an institution in some of the States in relation to which they have no duties to perform and no re¬ sponsibilities to bear, are utterly incapable of adopt¬ ing the proper means to rescue our country—our whole country—from its present lamentable condi¬ tion.” We had one duty to perform and one re¬ sponsibility to bear in reference to slavery, viz., to #ee that the desperate faction of 300,000' slaveholders at the South should not enforce their absurd claim, not only to rule all the slaves and poor white trash of the South, but the twenty millions of north¬ ern freemen, in reference to questions such as the introduction of slavery into our own States and into free Territories upon which the Constitution gave us the right to vote and decide. long’s anti-draft resolution. Mr. Long, of Ohio, offered the following resolution: | “Resolved, That a committee, to be composed of one member from each State represented in this Conven¬ tion, to be selected by the respective delegatlpns thereof, be appointed for the purpose of proceeding forthwith to the city of Washington, and, on behalf of this Convention and the people, to ask Vlr. Lincoln to suspend the operation of the pending draft fur 500,000 more men until the people shall have an op¬ portunity through the ballot box in a free election— uninfluenced in any manner by military orders or, military interference—of deciding the question, now fairly presented to them, of war or peace, at the ap¬ proaching election in November; and that said com¬ mittee be and they, are hereby instructed to urge upon Mr. Lincoln, by whatever argument they can employ, to stay the .flow of fraternal blood, at least so far as the pending draft will continue to augment it, until the people, the source of all power, shall have an opportunity of expressing their will for or against the further prosecution of the war in the choice of candidates for the Presidency? “ Which was referred to the Committee on Resolu¬ tions,” The Convention having previously de¬ termined to nominate Gen. McClellan ^br President, who is the father of the idea of filling our armies by conscription, dared not say anything in their platform on the sub¬ ject. The above resolution was therefore smothered, and the question dodged. MONROE DOCTRINE IGNORED. - I , ... . • S- \ Mr. Aldrich, of Pennsylvania, proposed the following resolution, as part of the plat¬ form, all of which were rejected by the Com¬ mittee on Resolutions, and the Convention : “ Resolved, That we cannot view with indifference the open repudiation and vio ation of the Monroe doctrine, the establishment of an empire on the ruins of a neighboring republic.” This resolution suffered the same fate of the anti-draft resolution offered by Mr. Long. The following extract feebly shows how exclusively Yallandigham was the hero of the Convention. He could not even rise from his seat without being greeted by the shouts of his peace worshippers: “ Mr. Vallimdigham rose and was greeted with loud and pro’oi ged cheering and cries ‘ Take the platform.’ He finally stepped to the platform, and merely gave notiee that the Committee on Resolutions would meet in toe evening at 8 o’c'ock, at the rooms ot the New Y'o>k delegation i'n the Sherman House.’ (Immense cheering.) “ The Convention then adjourned until 10 o’clock the following morning.” We quote from the addresses delivered during the evening in front of the Sherman House. Mr. M. Y. Johnson, of Illinois, formerly of Fort, Lafayette, is happy to tell them that Yallandigham is making the platform. “ Mr. Johnson s id that ihe great question nt the present time wa6 the platform that was to be made, and tie was happy to tell them tp.ce plat¬ form. [Cheers.] They intended to place a p ace man on that piriform. [Cheer*.] They ought to give su., port to Mr. Valtandigham, [cheers], as he was trying to protect and get back their righis as citizens which hud been taken awnv by the present corrupt admini-tr-dion. 'I he admin¬ istration, by their infernal policy to put the negr above the white man, had de u^ed the country with blood and had sent to untimely graves ten hundred thousand men. • [Cheers.]” (What a monstrous lie !) 11 Hon. W. W. O'Brien, of Peoria, proposes to try Lincoln and hang him. “Mr. O’Brien accused the admi; btrution of attemptirg to gae the tress, putting down trial by ju y, «nd suspend¬ ing tbe Hebea J t’rrpus. But when Abr Ham l inco’n retired from tbe Pre idential chair they would renew trial by jury, and try him for the offenses he had comm-’tted against the laws and the constitution. He would be pro¬ vided with counsel, a: d p r otected by good democratic lawyers, (i heers.l Thty in power. Gne of these is ‘ arbitrary r-.ne^ts.’' Ge, . B. Mc» lellan ordered the most high handed o ne that has been made since the war beg*n. V\ e protose to go to the country on the charge of suspension of the writ of Habeas Corpus. 1 his was recommended bv Geo. B. McClel’an. Ws propose to go into the campaign bearing the olive branch of peace. Qeorg^ B.. Vci'lell-m tec mmemted drafting soldiers, and ttiH wears Abe Lincoln’s shoulder streps, and since bei’ g relieved from active service to which he wou.d gladly return, he said at * est Point, that too mnch blood lad been abed, too much treasure expended, to stop thie war now. With him we can make no point-on the disturbance of the social relations of the country. With him v g irfnst crop tbs doctrlue of State sovereignty. For two years he labored to coerce States. IN FACT, GENTLEMEN, THE Nomination op george b. nicCLRLlaxV CLASHES THE ENTIRE-INDICTMENT WHICH WB HAVE DRAW N AGAINaT THE ADMINISTRATION. fGreat cheering.) Hon. Mr. Curtis, of New York, said: “ 1 trust the dey w.ll never come when the scenes wit- nes^od in the commonwealth of Kentucky—a State ren¬ dered glorious by the associati ns of the pari—will be enacted on this soil—when the administration will endeavor by force of arms to interfere with f! e fr-e sentiment and fr-e will of the people. But. if that day sh uld come, before Cod a n d pi eight of 'leaven, I would invoke the fid of hour ter revolution, (fond eb-err g.) A people who w-uld Submit to that degred of outrage ard tyranny which destroys the cba’ter of them bbertie9—(to wit to be require d to swear allegiance to, tl>e Ui-ited States before voting in a ?tate claimed to belong to.the con r ederacy) — are rot fitted to live and stand up as'rren. tut should lie down and'die eg s’ares. (Cheers arid cries r f ‘ rood.’) I warn the government now in power not to trao-ple top far upon the liberties which a e ’eft to ns sejfcr if they do, they will be swept b- fore a Sto-rm as a ship is swept from the sea in a storm. (Cheers.,” -John Fuller, of Michigan, characterizes the war for the Union, as “This unholy, cruel, and abominable struggle. [Loud cheers ] Gentlemen, are you willing lomrer to submit to this state of things? [Cries of “No.”] Our land is already wet with fraternal blood. Our press has been shackled, the liberty of speech has been suppressed, the writ of habeas corpus has been suspended, and he who dared to raise his voice against these arbitrary and unconstitutional acts has been arrested by the minions of the government, and incarcerated in dungeons or banished from his native land. [Cheers.] Are you willing, I again ask, to bear these hardships and to submit to this tyranny and oppression ? [Renewed cries of “No, no!”] Are you willing to follow in the footsteps of Abraham Lincoln, the perjured wretch who ha3 violated the oath he took before high heaven to support the Con¬ stitution and preserve the liberties of the people? [Cheers. ] Mr. G C. S nderson, says, the Union must not be restored by war. “Fellow-citizens, what say you? Is it not time that this infernal war should stop? [Voices — “Yes.”] Has not there been blood enough shed ? Has there not been property enough destroyed? Have we net all been bound, hand and foot., to the abolition car, »hat is ro'ling .oveT our necks like the wheels of another Juggernaut? We all love our country. There is nothing would rejoice us more than to see the stars and stripes, the glorious emblem of our Union, re-established all over this country, but it ought to be done by concession and compro¬ mise. [Applause. A voice.— “That is tie doc¬ trine.”] It must not be by a further shedding of blood. It cannot be. [A voice: “ It will never be done by blood.”] We must have peace. Peace is our motive; nothing but peace. If the Southern Confederacy, by any possibility, be subjugated by this abolition administration, the next thing they would turn their bayonets on the free men of the North and trample you in the dust.” Hou. James H. Birch, of Missouri, thinks re union may be impossible even by peace measures. “ His hopes and prayers were that such a union might even yet be practicable, but if it be found to be otherwise — if the conflict of interest or of passion has been rendered really “ irrepressible ” by the iniquities of the party in power, and it shall be so adjudged by the same c< mpetent authority which ordained our present Constitution, let not the blame of it be attached to the democratic party. But if the country is doomed to become permanently di* v ded, it will be recorded in history that it was not the fault, of the democracy, whether in the inception or the prosecution of the measures which have [ed and are yet leading to so saddening an alternative.,” That’s cool, after the democracy have permanently destroyed the Union, they are not to he held responsible for it, but rather to be glorified for the deed ! 12 SPEECH OF CHAUNCEY BURR. C. ChaunCey Burr, a prominent New York Democrat, editor of “The Old Guard,” j prayed God that the rebels might never be subdued.” f ; “In addressing the audience Mr. Burr spoke sub¬ stantially as follows: He did not expect td make a speech as the time for speech-making was past. Ar¬ gument was useless, and the time for action had come. He would speak with that freedom which had been the wopt of the people of America for the last three years. Puring that time, spies and informers had been on the tracks of the people, add, in point of fact, we had lived under a despot sm worse than that of Austria. The people had submitted to that despotism, not because of a want off courage, bravery or pluck, but because they were a law-and. ' order people They had patiently waited for a change in the policies of Lincoln’s administration, but it had been denied them ; and for nearly four years they had submitted to these acts of desnotisra. And it was a wonder that they had a Cabinet and men who carried out the infamous orders of the gorilla tyrant that usurped the Presidential chair. In New Jersey they had shifted the responsibility of these despotic acts to the shoulders of the abolition¬ ists, and more than one Provost Marshal,had a hole made through his head. In that State, it was a diffi¬ cult matter at one time to find an abolitionist who would accept such a position, and the administration had tried to bribe democrats, but, thank God, they had failed. But they had well nigh reached the end of their reign of despotism. They could not and should not go any further. They were about to be j sWept from the land by an indignant people. They talked about a rebellion down South, but a greater rebellion had been in progress in the North. The question as to what should be done with those States had been asked a hundred times since he came to Chicago. He could not answer the question. Those States did not belong to him. They did not belong to Lincoln. We bad no right to burn their wheat fields, steal their pianos, spoons or jewelry. Mr. Lincoln had stolen a good many thousand negroes, but for every negro he had thus stolen, he had stolen ten thousand spoons. It had been said that, if the South would lay down their arms, they would be received again into the Union. The South could not honora¬ bly lay down her arms, for she was fighting for her hoioor. Two millions of men had been sent down to the slaughter pens of the South, and the army of Lincoln could not again be filled, neither by enlistments or conscription. If he ever uttered a prayer, it was that not one of the States of the Union should be conquered and subjugated. They bad tried for three years to whip the seceding States back into the Union, but, from the way the war had been con¬ ducted, they were more likely to whip us. W e were told that we would conquer the rebellious States. They could not be conquered, and he prayed God that they never might be; The democratic party was for peace. Their representatives had come to Chicago to nominate a candidate for the Presidency. He would be nominated on a peace platform, and they could not succeed on any other. If any other platform was adopted they deserved to be defeated.” The eloquent speaker was frequently and vocifer¬ ously applauded during his speech of half an hour or mare. The Chicago Times, says of the following speech of Henry Clay Dean : “His speech was one of peculiar bitterness, abounding with stubborn, irresistible,'incontrovertible' facts. It imparted enthusiasm to the audience, and blistered the souls of the republicans whc? had the courage to listen to it to the end ” > ' REMARKS BY HENRY CLAY DEAN. He said in the presence of the face of Camp Douglas and all the satraps of Lincoln, that the American people were ruled by felons. Lincoln had never turned a dishonest man out of office or kept an honest one in. [A voice— 4 What have you to say of Jeff Davis? "] I have nothing to say about him. Lincoln is engaged in a controversy with him, and I never interfere between black dogs. [At this point in the speaker’s remarks, an abolition rowdy shouted * Dry up, you old tory,’ when there was a cry to put him out. Mr. Dean resumed:} For over three years Lincoln had been calling for men, and they had been given. But with all the vast armies placed at his command, he had failed "! failed ! / failed ! ! I FAILED ! ! ! ! Such a failure had never been known. Such destruction of human life had never been known since the destruction of Sennacherib by th« breath of the Almighty. And still the monster usurper wanted more men for his slaughter pens. [Loud cri->8 of 4 he shan’t have more.’] The careful husbandman, in deadening the forest was always careful in preserving the young growth of timber, and in selecting his swine for the slaughter, he pre¬ served the younger ones for future use. But the tyrant and despot who ruled this people to destruction paid no regard to age or condition. He desired to double the widowhood and duplicate the orphans. He blushed that such a felon should Occupy the highest place in the gift of the people. Perjury and larceny were written over him as often as was 4 one dollar’ on the one dollar bills of the Bank of the State of Indiana. [Criesof the 4 old villain.’] The democracy were for peace. The people were for peace, but the contractors, and army officers and satraps of the administration wanted it not . [Great applause.] Ever since the usurper, traitor, and tyrant had occupied the Presidential chair, the repub¬ lican party had shouted war to the knife, anti the knife to the hilt. Blood had flowed in torrents, and yet the thirst of the old monster was not quenched. His cry was for more blood. TUESDAY, August 80. Horatio Seymour having taken h ; s seafras permanent chairman, addressed the Con¬ vention in language more guarded than that of many of the street speakers, but agreeing with them in venomous hate of the North, laying the blame of the war upon Northern Christianity, under the slang term, “fanat¬ icism,” and upon Mr. Lincoln as the repre¬ sentative of the Northern people, and hav- ing.no word of fault to find with secession, rebellion, the rebel army, or the Confede¬ rate Government. He said : They did not intend to destroy our country — they did not mean to break down its institutions. But unhappify they were influenced by sectional prejudices, by fanati¬ cism, by bigotry, and by intolerance, and we hove found in the course of the list four years that-their animating sentiments have overruled their declarations and their promises, and swept them on step by step, until they have been carried on to actions Prom which at the outsat they would have shrunk away with horror. Even noyj, when war has desolated onr land, has laid It'S heavy bun- thens upon labor, when h i‘ 0 krnptey and ruin overh mg us, they will not have Union except upon conditions unknown to our Constitution ; they will not let the shedding of blood cease, even for a little t me, to see if Christian charity or the wisdom of statesmanship may not work out a method to save onr country. Nay, more than this, they will not listen to a proposal for peace which does not offar that which this government has no right to ask.” Gov. Seymour, in the last remark, indi¬ cates his belief that rebellion is no crime, involves no forfeiture of life or property and fhht the “ rights ” of rebels are* ft) slaughter the defenders of the Union as long as tbev can, and when whipped, t.o re¬ sume their places by the side of faithful, loyal men, without loss or punishment. 13 COWARDLY SURRENDER TO THE REBELS. The following is the chief plank in the platform adopted. It is a demand for a cowardly and dishonorable surrender to the rebels. It is a false arid shameful admission that the “North” is whipped; that the struggle to save the Union is a failure ; that all the bloodshed, and money spent, must go for nought, and that the rebels shall dic¬ tate their own terms of peace. Here is the tory plank: “ Resolved, That this Convention does explicity dec'are, as the sense of the American people, that alter four years (not till May next,) of failure to restore the Unioh by the experiment of war, during winch, under tne pretence of a military necessity, or war power higher than the Consti¬ tution, the Constitution itself has been disregarded in ©very part, (a lie.) and public liberty and private right alike trodden down, (another lie,) and the material pros¬ perity of the cobntry essentially impaired,—justice, hu¬ manity. liberty, and the lUblio weff.ire demand that 4*L mediate efforts be made for a <;e.->8atljN OF HORTlLlI IES, with a view to an ultimate conven¬ tion o' the Mates, or other peaceable means, to the end that at the earliest ptacticable moment, peace may be re 8 to rod on the basis of the Federal Mates.’’ On this pusillanimous platform Gen. George B. McClellan was placed as the Presidential standard-bearer of the “peace sneaks.” We commend to democrats and Republi¬ cans alike, the following extract from Mc¬ Clellan’s late West Point oration, which it will be perceived is in direct conflict with the National Platform of his party : ‘‘ To secure ourselves from the fate of the divided Re¬ publics of Italy and South America, to preserve our gov- trun ent from destruction, to enforce its Just power aud ihws, to maintain ouk very existence as a N ATlON—these were the causes which impelled us to draw the sword. Rebellion agaiust a government like o«ra. which contains the means of self-adjustment, and a pacific remedy for evils,should never be confounded with revolution against dtspotic power, which refuses redress of wrougs. Such a rebellion cauuot be justified uppn eth¬ icalgrounds; AND THE ONLY ALTERNATIVES FOR OUK CHOICE ARE ITS SUPPRESSION OR THE DB.-'TRUCrioN OF OUR NATION A>.I I Y. At such a time as this, aud in such a struggle, POLITICAL PaR- TiZANSHiP FROULD BE mERGED IN A TRUE AND BKAVE PATRIOTISM, which thinksonlyof the good of the whole country. It was in this cause, and with these motives that so many of our comrades have given their lives; AND TO THIS WE ARE ALL PERSON¬ ALLY PLEDGED IN > LL HONOR AND FIDELI¬ TY. Shall such devotion as that of OUR DEAD COM¬ RADES BE OF' NO aVaIL? Shall it be said in after ages that we lacked, the vigor TO COMPLETE THE WORK. THI S REGUN : tuat, after all these noble lives, freely given, WE HESIl’ATE.r AND FAILED TO KEEP STRAIGHT ON UNTIL OfJR LAND WAS 8AVED?" SPEECH OF HARRIS, OF MARYLAND. The name of Gen. McClellan having been placed in nomination before the Convention, and before the vote was taken, Mr. Harris, member of Congress from Maryland, and a delegate to the Convention, arose and said: (Quoted from the Chicago Times). " We democrats of Maryland have been oppressed, as you know. All onr rights have beeD trampled upon, and the stTong arm of the military has been over us as it rests upon ns now, as it was instituted by your nominee, Gen. McClellan. (Confusion, applause and fusses, maiDly from the galleries ) Admit the fact that all our liberties and Tights have been destroyed, and I ask you, in the name of common sense, in the name of justice, in the name of hon¬ or, will you reward the man who struck the first blow ? (Applause and hisses.) From the indications I see here to-day, I have reason to fear that the man who has been in the front of this usurpation, (Gen, Met leflan.) Will be the successful candidate." GEN. MCCLELLAN THE FIRST USURPER. “ I claim it as a right to state that one of the men whom you have nominated, is a tyrant. [Hisses and cheers.] Gen. McClellan was the very first man who inaugurated the system of usurping State right*. [Uproar.] This I can prove, and I pledge rnystlf, if you will hear rae, to prove every charge in the indict¬ ment And it is the duty of a jury, when a charge is made which is proven, to convict and not reward the offender. Maryland has been cruelly trampled upon by this man, and I cannot consent, as a delegate from that State, to allow his nomination to go unopposed. What you ask me 10 do is, in reality, to support the man who stabbed my own mother; and I for one — and I believe I speak for the whole delegation from Maryland — will never do it. We will never, never consent that the State of Maryland shall be so dis¬ honored. What, is it a fact that you care nothing for the dishonor of a sovereign Slate? Is it really the case that you can consent that the man who overthrew liberty and crushed underfoot the free In¬ stitutions of a State, shall receive reward instead of punishment for bis tyranny? In old times, it was the doctrine that an injury done to one State, was an ; injury inflicted on all; and, instead of rewarding the perpetrator of the injury, each State should come forward to resent it. Now you propose a reward in i the shape of Presidential honors io the man who first set the iron heel of despoti m upon my State.”—Chi¬ cago Times report. Senator Harris then read from a news¬ paper, the following order of Gen. McClel¬ lan, dated Sept. 12, 18b 1, for the ARREST OF THE MARYLAND LEGISLATURE. “Maj. Gen. N. P. Banks, U. S. A. General — After a full consultation with the Presi- : dent, Secretaries of State, War, etc., it has been de- | cided to effect the operation proposed for the 17th. Arrangements have been made to have a government steamer at Annapolis to receive the prisoners and carry them to their destination. Some four or five of the chief men in the affair are to be arrested to-day. When they meet on the 17th, you will have everything prepared to arrest the whole | party, and be sure that none escape. It is understood that you will arrange with Gen. Dix and Gov. Seward, the modus operandi. It j has been intimated to me that the meeting might take place on the 14th ; please be prepared. Iwould be glad to have you advise me frequently of your ar¬ rangements in regard to this, very important matter. If it is successfully carried out, it will go far to¬ wards breaking the back-bone of the rebellion. It will pmbably be well to baye a special train quietly prepared to take the prisoners to Annapolis. I leave this exceedingly important affair to your tact and discretion—the absolute necessity of secrecy and suceess. With the highest regard, I am, my dear General, your sincere friend, (Signed) GEORGE B. McCLELLAN, Maj. Gen. U. S. A.” (Continued from Chicago Tribune Report.) “ Again Mr. Harris spoke. I am here for the pur- ! pose of presenting to the Convention, the character of the man whom you have nominated, and I wish ! you to hear his character and to know him as well as I do. [Cheers.] [Three cheers for Mac. being | called for, they were given amidst a whirlwind of hisses.] Well, sir, that is a document by which i George B. McClellan took up and arrested the legis¬ lature of Maryland, a sovereign State, met in order to thwart the tyranny and oppression of Abraham Lincoln, [Cries of ‘ Show him up, show him up/ 4 go on, go on,’] to subvert and overturn those things | that, are the foundation and basis ot our country. : Where is the man who sympathizes with Maryland, I who could go to the polls and vote for such a man? Why, Mr. President, how long do you suppose that I these sons and representatives of Maryland were 14 imprisoned in the bastiles of the United States? For sixteen months they were' separated from their families, torn from their homes, kept from their business, and when at last their bars and bonds were loose, it was in spite of the acts of him by whom they were placed there, of him, that devil McClellan . [Great sensation, hisses and considerable cheering.] Well, sir, I look upon it that it. not only struck at the liberties of Maryland and the freedom of the people, but at the existence of the legislature of our State, and all the charges I can make against Lincoln and his administration, I can make against this man McClellan. [Cheers.] Another count in the indictment, there is the letter of Oct. 29, 1861. The speaker was here interrupted by so much dis¬ order and rowdyism, that he was forced to suspend the reading of the letter for several minutes, the breach of order belDg so manifestly beyond reason. Although the Convention had jlist adopt¬ ed a platform claiming “ freedom of speech” as one of its principles, the effort to sup¬ press what Mr. Harris bad to 3ay, was so fierce and boisterous, that it was not until he had knocked down one of the delegates from New York, and given distinct indica* tions that he was armed anil ready for a “ free fight,” after the manner of the chival¬ ry, that he could secure a hearing. He pro¬ ceeded : GEN. MCCLELLAN INTERFERES WITH ELECTIONS IN MARYLAND, AND SUSPENDS THE HABEAS CORPUS. “ I now proceed to another cotmt in the indictment. On October 29,1801, he thus wiote to General Banks : „ ‘ GEN EKAL : There is an apprehension amongst Union citizens ip many parts of Maryland of attempted interfer¬ ence in the e ection to take place on the (Jth or Novemb r next. In order to prevent this, the Major General com¬ manding—(and who, gentlemen, was the Major General coimminding but George B. Alct lellau ?) Jhe Major General commanding directs you to send a sufficient de- tachnir at to protect Union vorerx, auit to see tout nothing is ui.Ou ed to interfere with their rights as voters, ’ _ (Here the speaker was inte'rrUptsd with cries of * That’s right,’ 4 Good I good I ’ while vociferous cheers were given fbi Gen. McClellan ) ‘Mr. iiARtUc; i would have concluded leng ago, Mr. President, except for the iurerruptions that nave been made,bv this assembly itself; and, certainly, ypu cannot take advantage of your own wrong, anti prevent me pro¬ ceeding. (i be speaker then read the remainder of the letter, which authorized Gen. Banks, in order to prevent these adeged treasonable deHgns, to 4 SUSPEND THE WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS’) Now, sir. who feared the disunionists ol Maryland would ever interfere with the Unionists ? With the power in, the hands of the admin¬ istration, with the power in the hands of (he Governor of Maryland, where in the name of God was'itto be supposed, except in the mind of somehypoc’ite, that i" was necessary for some military force to come iuto the State and suspend that great writ, thsp Habeas Corpus ? (Cheers.) And why were these ‘ uisnnionists’ or Maryland, allowed, to go at large till the day.of e,ection ; said he, you must arrest them before going to the polls and you may discharge them after the elec (ion. (Cheats.) Why was this done ? Why, if there.was danger to the country in allowing these men to remain at large, were they not'arrested til, the day of election in the State, by order of this Gen. McC.ellen. Those things that we have charged so frequently against Abraham Lincoln, HE, GEORGE B. McC'LEJLLAN, HAS BEEN GUlTY OF DImsELF. (Cheers and hisses.) Sir,he declares that, under ; th« plea of military necessity— that tyrant’s plea of military necessity—Abraham Iiucoln ha* the power of abolishing one of the institutions of .Mary¬ land, Missouri,'and Kentucky; THEPOWEitOF ABOl>- ISHIAG THE INSTITUTION OF SLAVERY—a great right that you consider yourselves bound to protect and to protect Mary,nnd, Missouri and Kentucky, in protecting, (See hjs/Hariison Landing letter to the President.) Now, what have jou to say to this charge against George B. McClellan., (Cheers and hisses.) ‘ You have to meet them one Way or another, for they will be made by our opponents, and it Is better to hear them from a democrat before the canvass commences (* beers ) What,, then, have you to say in his lavor ? Why ag a military man, HAb re BEEN DEFEATED EVERYWHERE ? (Cries of “No no,” “ Yes, yes,” and cheers.) The siege of Richmond was not, I think, a sno- cess ; (ironically,) the battli, of Antietam wag not a suc¬ cess, and in him as a military leader you have NOTHING W HATEVER TO BRAG OF, while yon hate co rnbind with MILITARY INCAPACITY Ti E FACT THAT HE HAS INTERFERED WITH AND DESTROYED THE CIVIL RIGHTS OF THE PEOPLE, if OtfrU McC'ellsn, when Abraham Lincoln t Id him to arrest thie legislature of MaryAnd. had ssid to him. ‘ I have received a comnjhsion ns commander at your band*-*-you can take it back before 1 become a tyrant,” he would have stjod before the wor'd as a MAN ; but inasmuch Ashe received and acGdjUpon instructions which struck a blow at civil libeity he became the mere tool of Abraham Lincoln. A MILD CONSERVATIVE SPEECH. Capt. Kooutz, of Pitt-burgh, one of the leaders of the democratic party, aod an ardent McOlellanite, thus reflected the sen¬ timents of his “ democratic ” brethren. The speech is an evidence that free speech has been suppressed by Lincoln : Lincoln was now played out; the opposition to him was going to be bold and powerful, there must be no underhand work, and if democrats catch Lincoln’s b—y satrap spies among them, they must cut their d--d throats, that’s all. [Applause.] It is the duty of every American to vote for a peace candi¬ date. For seventy years the democratic party safel guided the ship of state through all dangers; buY now, in less than three years, the shoddy despotismt has deluged the, country with blood, destroyed all national institutions, broken up the home circle, and changed the most glorious country under the sun into a garden of discord, where brother lifts up his hand to slay brother. [Applause.] Shall this state of. afr fairs Iasi? [‘No, no.’] Shall more wives be made widows, and more children fatherless, and greater hate be stirred up between children of the same glo¬ rious constitution? If not, vve must put our foot upon the tyrant’s neck, and destroy it. The demo¬ cratic government must be raised to power, and Lin¬ coln, with his Cabinet of rogues, thieves and spies, be driven to destruction. What shall we do with him ? [A voice—“Send him here, and I’ll make a coffin for him, d—n him.”] Yes, d—n him and his miserable followers. I should like to see the noble George B. McClellan as President, [cheers,] and that great democrat, Horatio Seymour, should occupy the posi¬ tion of Secretary of State. In the Cabinet I would see the name of Yoorhees, and the brilliant galaxy of gentlemen statesmen who cluster round the demo¬ cratic banner. Such a government would bring peace to the country, and would tend greatly to ren¬ der negative the evils of the ^present corrupt admin¬ istration. WILLING TO ACKNOWLEDGE SECESSION. Rev. Prof. Johnston, of Missouri, went a step further. If he could’nt make peace any other way, he was very willing to acknowl¬ edge secession. He said: ' i , , We have already sacrificed one million five hundred thousand men in this deadly strife. I was in favor, in the beginning pf the war, of its vigorous prosecu¬ tion. But it has no)y become a war for crushing the white man, and raisiagYhe negro. Every negro that we have set free has cost us the life of a white man, and five, thousand dollars besides. I regret that slavery exists. But .because it does exist, don’t let us make fools of ourselves. I want to see peace with the rights of all the citizens of this land restored. Is that right ? [A voice: Yea we want a peace man for President. Down with war men,"”] If it shall be necessary in the settlement of our difficulties to allow a few start to form a ovnstellor iionty themselves , I thlDk we can be just as safe, just as well protected, and just as free and happy under a Union of Republics as we have been under a Union of States. I want tp see this whole contin¬ ent bound together by a grand union of Republics. “ No pent up Utica contracts our powers, But the whole boundless Continent is ours.” 15 And we will have it, and will have peace and har¬ mony and self government with it. [Cheers.] ALEXANDER LONG, OF OHIO, DENOUNCES MCCLELLAN As a coorcionist, a usurper, and an emanci¬ pationist, unworthy the support of the dem¬ ocratic party. “ Mr. Long, a member of Congress from Ohio : I have but a few words to say, and X propose to say them ; and I am not afraid to speak what I think, even in the face of gentlemen who don’t want to hear. I have faced the music before, and I am wiiling to do it here. Now, gentlemen of the convention, what have we complained of for the last three or four years ? What has been the burden of our complaint against Mr. Lincoln and his administration? He has abridged the freedom of speech; he has arbitrarily arrested citizens and confined them in Bastiles, and he has interfered with the freedom of elections. What have you proposed in these resolutions? You have, to a certain extent, vindicated the freedom of speech ; you have condemned arbitrary arrests and denounced interference with the freedom of elections; and yet you propose in George B. McClellan to place upon that platform ONE WHO HAS GONE FURTHER IN ALL THREE OF THESE MEASURES THAN HAS ABRAHAM LINCOLN HIMSELF. [Hisses and applause.] George B. McClellan has not con¬ tented himself with the arrest of a citizen here and there, and incarcerating him in a Bastile, but ha3 arrested an entire Legislature at one order. HE HAS ALSO SUSPENDED THE WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS of which you have complained. He has acquiesced in the emancipation proclamation of which you have complained of Mr. Lincoln ; and yet you propose, in the very face of the denuncia¬ tions you have heaped upon the head of Mr. Lin¬ coln, to stultify yourselves by taking up a man who has been a supple instrument of Mr. Lincoln for carrying dut the very acts you denounce. Then, gentlemen, is this what the people are to expect from a democratic convention. [Voices, ‘no, no.’] I trust not. Give us a candidate for President — ANY ONE EXCEPT GEORGE B. McClellan —any man, i care not who HE IS — [applause and hisses]—ANY ONE WHOSE HANDS ARE CLEAN, whose skirts &re clear,—any one who has not been instrumental in making ar¬ bitrary arrests ; in violating the . freedom of elec¬ tions and the rights citizens in every possible manner in which he could carry out the wishes of Abraham Lincoln. “ In conclusion, I beg of yon not to nominate McClellan. Having laid upon the table the time honored principles of the democratic party, as expressed in the resolution o( 1798-99—having ignored them by laying the resolution on the table - and WEAK AS YOUR PLATFORM IS, looking in some degree to peace, as It does, in God's name don’t place upon it a man WHO IS PLEDGED TO EVERY ACT AGAINST WHICH YOUR PLATFORM DECLARES. SPEECHES OUTSIDE THE CONVENTION. Mr. Mahoney, a northern rebel,recommends rebellion, and says: “WE MUST GOTO THE SOUTH, IF SHE WILL NOT COME TO US.” Mr. Mahoney, of IoWa, having lately rep¬ resented that State in the Old Capitol Prison, was now introduced : “ When rulers aggressed on popular rights he saw the remedy in opposing force to usurpation— the people themselves to he judge of the occasion, time and manner of its application. He was in favor of peace; but few democrats had the courage to so declare themselves. The war affected all classes of people injuriously, except capitalists and placemen. He would have peace by all mean3. If the South would not come to us for peace, we should go to the South. We should not he discouraged by denials and failures; the constitution of the United States was not an made at once. It had been amended in twelve particulars. He WOULD STILL FURTHER AMEND it, to re-establish peace and union in permanency He had enjoyed three months reflec¬ tion on these thingB under the heel of Abraham Lincoln, and he would have all join him in the unswerving resolve to submit to no new en¬ croachments of tyranny.” Mr. Snow, of Washington City : “ He, (Mr. S.) predicted that, in view of the action of this convention, Lincoln wou'd in¬ stantly become a peace man, to enable him to withdraw the armies from the field and employ them at the polls.’’ Hon. Mr. Early, of Nebraska: “ He invoked his countrymen of the green island to use their power in this government, and the shillaldh, if necessary, against any in¬ vasion oi the freedom of the ballot box.’’ WEDNESDAY, August 81. ) IN CONVENTION. f A PLAN TO ASSEMBLE THE DEMOCRACY FOR THE- “ FREE FIGHT,” OR NORTHERN REBELLION. Gov. Wiekliffe, leader of the rebel wing of the Kentucky copperheads—the largest slaveholder in Kentucky, and having three sons in the- rebel army, said : “ The delegations from the West, including that State to which I am attached, are of opinion that circumstances may occur between this and the fourth of March, that will make it necessary for the great mass of the democracy of this country to be reas¬ sembled. To get up a new convention is a work of delay and much difficulty—and my object is. that the dissolution of this convention shall not be affected by its adjournment, after it finishes its labors to-day, but to leave it to the Executive Committee, and at the instance of the democracy, if any occasion shall require, to convene us at such time and place that the Executive National Committee shall designate. Resolved, That the convention shall not be dis¬ solved by the adjournment at the close of its busi¬ ness, but shall remain as organized, subject to be called together at any time and place that the Execu¬ tive National Committee shall designate. Which resolution was received with much applause and carried unanimously.” The Convention having nominated McClel¬ lan, Clement L. Vallandigham moved to make the nomination unanimous. He was seconded by John McKean, of New York, who gave notice that there was danger of a “revolution, a bloody revolution,” which of course, would be averted if the copperheads should be allowed their own way. The threat sounded like those we heard from the present rebels in the canvass of 1860. Pendleton, of Ohio, having been nom¬ inated for Vice President, we will let him describe his own position in relation to the rebels. He made a speech in Congress on the 18th of January, 1861. He afterwards carefully revised it, and had it published in the Appendix to the Globe. We quote from it the following passages : “ My voice to-day is for conciliation ; my voice is for compromise, and it is but the echo of the voice of my constituents. I beg you, gentlemen, who with me rep- 16 resent the Northwest ; you who, with me, represent j the State of Ohio ; you who with me, represent the city of Cincinnati, I beg you, gentlemen, to hear that voice. If you will not; IF YOU FIND CONCILI¬ ATION IMPOSSIBLE; IF YOUR DIFFERENCES ARE SO GREAT THAT YOU CANNOT OR WILL NOT RECONCILE THEM, THEN, GENTLEMEN, LET THE SECEDING STATES DEPART IN PEACE ; LET THEM ESTABLISH THEIR GOV¬ ERNMENT AND EMPIRE, AND WORK OUT THEIR DESTINY ACCORDING TO THE WISDOM WHICH GOD HAS GIVEN THEM.” THE ESSENCE OF DEMOCRACY. brother.” Emulate her example. Roll on the car of peace and stand to your guns ready for the emer- gency which events may force upon you for this deci¬ sion. Be ever true to the faith of the fathers and you j will triumph. No more arbitrary arrests will be permitted with impunity. No more Vallandighams will be dragged from the bosom of their families, and spirited away to a foreign land or a dungeon, unless the attempt | costs blood. ' ' . '-at STRIKING PARALLEL—HORATIO SEYMOUR, BEN¬ EDICT ARNOLD AND THE CHICAGO PLAT- The following are specimen chips of the speechifying “ hove in ” at the ratification meeting held on Wednesday: Mr. Sanderson said: “ If Abe Lincoln was re-elected, he would free the negroes of the South and then enslave the people. We must maintain STATE RIGHTS.” Mr. Rollins, of Missouri, said: “ I lovb our Southern friends. They are a noble, a brave and chivalrous people, although they are trying to break up the Government.” Mr Hanna, of Indiana, was heavy on Ben Butler and poured over his devoted head such venomous slitne as this: “By whom was Lincoln supported? Prominent among his supporters is Butler, half devil, one-quarter beast, and less than one fourth human, begot en by the Prince of Hell, spewed from the rotten womb of crime, and thrown into the lap of civilization, a de¬ formed, unfinished wretch. He was sent before his time into this breathing world, less than half made up, and is so hateful looking that the dogs bark at him as he passes by.” “ By G—d we must have McClellan nominated. We must put a stop to this d—d war.”— Dean Rich¬ mond of New York. “ Let us hurl that usurper from power. Never till that day comes when the usurper and his victim meet at the judgment seat can he be punished for his wrongs, for his conspiracy against American liberty.” — Baker , of Michigan. “ I advise peace and harmony, but if in the strug gle it reaches the point that the ballot box is ever touched with sacrilegious hands, I say, then and there, come what will, let the lives and honor of all be pledged to the biggest fight the world ever saw.”— Bishop , of Michigan. “ What is this war for? The nigger. It is for the nigger against the white man. I thiok we don’t want our bosoms stuffed so much with damned niggers this warm weather. I don’t believe the negro is .equal to the white man. Is it nut high time that this infernal war was stopped? If the South could be subjugated by this infernal war, the bayonets would be turned against the North. Come weal or woe, we will be for the sovereignty of the States and individual rights.” — Mr. Bander son , of Pa. A SHRIEK FOR A DISUNION PEACE. Hon. Henry Warren, chairman of the State Committee of Rhode Island, after de¬ nouncing the ruinous reign of the “ Black Republican tyrant,” said: Little Rhode Island, carried away by the impulse of the moment, did once lend herself to the mad prcject of this Abolition war; but she now sheathes the sword and cries, “War is murder —I will not kill my FORM. From Horatio Sey¬ mour's Speech at Chi¬ cago. The bigotry of fanat¬ icism and intrigues uf place-men have made the bloody pages of the his¬ tory of the past three years. The guaranteed rights of the people to bear arms has been sus¬ pended up to the very borders of Canada; so that American servitude is put. in bold contrast with British liberty. Mr. Lincoln thinks a procla¬ mation worth more than I peace ; we think the blood of our people more precious than the edicts of the President. Four years ago a Con¬ vention met in this city, when our country was peaceful, prosperous and happy. * * * Had wise statesmanship se¬ cured the fruits of victo¬ ries, fo-day there would have been peace in our land. The democratic party will put down despotism, I because it hates the igno- ! ble tyranny which trow degra les the American people. ■ From the Chicago Plat- j jorm. Resolved , That this Convention does explicit¬ ly declare, as the sense of the American people, that, after four years of failure to restore the Un¬ ion by the experiment of war, during which, under the pretense of a military necessity or war power higher than the Consti¬ tution, the Constitution itself has been disre¬ garded in every part, and public liberty and private right alike trodden down, and the material pros¬ perity of the country es¬ sentially impaired, jus¬ tice, humanity, liberty, and the public welfare, demand that immediate efforts be made for a ces¬ sation of hostilities, etc. From Benedict Ar¬ nold's Proclamation to the Cit'zens and Soldiers of the United States, issued October 24, 1780. You are promised lib¬ erty by the leaders of your affairs, but is there an individual in the en¬ joyment of it, saving your oppressors ? Who among you dare to speak or write what he thinks against the tyranny w r hioh has robbed you of your property, imprisons your sons, drags you to the field of battle, and is deluging your country with blood ? Our country once was happy, and had the prof¬ fered peace been embrac¬ ed, the last two years of misery had been spent in peace and plenty, and repairing the desolation of the quarrel that would have set the interest of Great Britain and Amer- ca in a true light, and ce¬ mented their friendship. I wish to lead a chosen band of Americ ms to the attainment ot peace, lib¬ erty and safety, the first objects in takin; the field. What is America but a land of widows, orphans and beggars? But what need of argument to such as feel infinitely more misery than tongue can express? I give my promise of most affection¬ ate welcome to all who are disp* sed to join me in measures necessary to close the scene of our af¬ fliction, whica must be increased until we are content with ihe liberality of the parent country, which still offers us pro¬ tection and perpetual ex¬ emption from all taxes but such as we shall think fit to impose upon our¬ selves. BKWKDICT \RNOLD.