THE PREPARATION. PROPERTIES AND METABOLIC BEHAVIOR OF DEAMINIZED PROTEINS MAX SHAW DUNN A. B. Simpson College, 1916 M. S. University of Illinois, 1918 THESIS Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY IN CHEMISTRY IN THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS 1921 — C - — vj I** .* I rw ^r«.iHT ahv taht m^saH i lK£Ui?^ tlJiiiZ *.■ j^'.j 'll ^.Wk' h^ ... 5.'' Yft mm /mHire V . 1^5 MO‘i 2rp5:»iMH>uuoa5i hht ' lo «fHT ‘‘ . .^-. .Ji? a:*fHoaci ■' w* \ ^ 4 : . ‘^ / /:. »(»r»KT !{• tHiwO fil int.nrHi^9(l V* 6«»H '*u‘' B i\ 'i. '^t'’ s*jt' T' .< *m nut)ubn«3«a , .s'; f •-•'Jitimmo') no MoirKoimcx.H Ujof^l V C'x «ii4x.u, '•'- rj i .f" ..sisiSs •*i»4Mm utl MM iiH **M>>t3 t,'y«trc^ vyl , ^ • ivfvwm 'Hm wm Mm » mn Sa*^*’ ,s-:^ ‘^"i- , vi.s: *.« kf.j 'a ■ :, I I.' I ■' tH'lkiiM L— la •; ,^. ^ -C, * •If > ■.»1« . • V .>7,,;nl^sr^^W^^^^ ; ■ ■ ■ ;;.7. ■ -il'lT ■ ,XSp&4. '.,|| '*';;U 'i : V/.MW 'i ii#, tf'. E.' ;;„vK ,7^ ■’ 'Ji<- *' '^W!I- " •“ ■'- "'** • ’■' ‘ 'i' ^ \ , ^ Bm ’■ r i b R tt : ^.' it ' "'V; fc*. ^ ^ <■ *•' ^ '-t-.: r ' /n(;i)JR^ftv• 'Mit'-MU'’"' '.^‘■■■■' ' A.*' V^Si' / v' ' ' '■-•• , 5. ^*^-:.r , • : . r‘-. ■ -. .'\ .-. ■ at a# ■: . ■•■ t. |V ^ -v^.. '■■-ftkcf :v^ J K- . ■ *• ■• .• ‘‘lailF\ ! .*■ ■ ‘.. •■ >. V 1 ■■. j8 '» ;il' .•■ xrt S-y~ •“ *■ 'r-W ■ '* ^Si ;■ ;.' ..i; f rf i p s,^ ''■ ;.- , - .'fe '0^' - ^ 7- At. 7 ' ••■■ ■ '’ ■ ,‘j ‘- ■’■ •'■*•* /[i f • ■>! VjK‘l^' Ift, . ...tnif.j^. ., ■■ r ■ • ,. ■ 'V '* ■ ' V 'vV -’*'*l^ra ; {!: »'■ ■'■a;'fe’;.7n7 ’ivwjsp^l^a^^ .',, n k'4^.,' j'l*' if-5'.'' *■' ' —V '' 'V '**.. • . ... . ' T ,Si 1 II, 1*' . , ■ ■i' ; . r- •«ttr , w . ' •' ... .xJLii ■ • .T. .^ ■ ^r - j I f i’^ '.>■ .. ;v I ^ iiw I • T • *1. -P'i) .'i'»i(^. C-^;k.,.,.,, S.'Wi > ^ fdi irTTH «»!■ ' •!/ , 111. 'Ail i .f , ••' ^ "^WiwSniiK 'i I® ’ iVJBiri ‘Jif‘ * „v. ■ ; ' V .‘i ' ''■■■' ' .' ','. '4'" . ®wi- .-• i' w ;>Jl-. ifffV " :. j ;.■ ' ; jMh; ,.'. . .1 '■ ■ ’*,iiiiiV..t Jii(kfi;^\ ‘,.!M-k‘<^^^ .^ig,'?;.' :-<-^S5• ■ rfV'4^ '’ ■('■'■ ' ' ■ .’ ^ T V' '’ '■ . -IP ' y^Uf:i -;c W«t; 6JC3^ 1 .’ ir^’,,' ,, a.4' CfC r tm'tc ’‘«»it(ifr.' ’‘'^ *•%... jE’ Bf* • '" i’t V •CJ.'X4f .'t‘i& . ‘iiifpxt -diHii. 1^'Tisl' Bb, : , ^;, . ■ ■ ■*'' ' aiiil M P'/, / j.>v ' . /y f.^: n<> ■■ E'<-v fi. "’ .-• i' "', %' ’ ** ■ 'A ,,' _ . - ■'■•• ‘ ;, , V' 'T'i)^ ' , *'A . ^ "i^;i .'. ' ' ') , ‘T^yuVi'.p^i • ^ , T «v,tf!' -rif^n^m: br*4 ':p ltO'.:.Xm[ *' Vi;V ■i ^'■- . . ■ „ - . ^''S\ ' ' <• ' ’ \. ^ ^ ^ , ■ ■' ■( : " : v ■ '‘'; ■ Ifif^.., ..'••'IS' ■ . /.,V'-' ,-'V -'** > • ■ ' •<> V » ' 'k.-’y . ’* b£(3, 3tf*Jj'‘.e.(jvtf3ffc.^’,^!qfco^ • i^^ 6Xq4|i ■: ^- to' " ■ ♦ '••'. ji ■* ' •‘* ' '"'* ’" .:.' ■' ■ ' '•''' ' "’ 1(1^'^“ _^; r i'.' 3. isolation are accented, one half of the lysine nitrogen of the proteins investigated will not evon approximate the free amino nitrogen as determined by the nitrous acid method. This author wishes to note further that the values for the free amino nitrogen of certain proteins, particularly gelatin, as determined by the nitrous acid method and by formol titration are not in agreement. Furthermore, it was found by these in- vestigators in the case of histones, sturin, gelatin and gly- cinin that the free amino nitrogen as determined by the nitrous acid method so exceeded one half of the lysine nitro- gen of these nroteins that the existence of free amino groups other than that due to lysine seemed probable. The problem of the basicity of the protein molecule has been attac-^ed in another way by studying the acid-combining capacity of proteins. Robertson (9) believes that the ex- periments of Blasel and Matula and those of Pauli and Hirsch- feld are ” direct proof that the terminal groups are not responsible for any apDreciable oortion of the acid combining- capacity of proteins. These investigators found that the combining-caoaci ty of deaminized gelatin for acids is but slightly inferior to that of ordinary gelatin, indicating, beyond any question, that the combining-capaci ty of gelatin for acids, is in very large proportion, attributable to ele- ments of the molecule other than the free -NH groups. The inference is unavoidable that the elements of the molecule which actually participate in the union with acids are, in very large pronortion, the -COHN- groups within the body of the protein molecule.” Bracewell (10) is of the opinion ^*** ■ Oftin# : ■ » ,t-. . '^ c«i 'i^y • , j r-ff's K .■•' ' ^ ^ ^ ... .. , -.»j' ’ .yurii.-4i|t:^'(b^/;^.. i • '^i i J in ora '■• ^ *.v. v_. f\'.) »^.v rU f ■' h- ' ' ^ "‘ "Y’’’'** »"-.v ■. ^ V O-Xl dWiKMw ^'■‘\ ..-• cl'j*! IV, .' . . r'-h'yi^ ; ' ■ ;•_ ^ ■'. '■'T- '>'^;*, .‘•■•/ w ■ ;• ^ ^ ® 1^ :| .'vWi tf.:;^^^. r.I’ics^' ,i^r> Jtj^)i j-M ^ ni. wiy \- .Vi ’ *'^ ' - ' I X iJ^-L •v.;‘ /•■••'. 4* -‘ •■ •‘•.'.‘•'rt / *i . rC ■ /'i^5 V -ilv*: 4 . that ” the amount of acid 'neutralized’ "by a considerable number of proteins is determined by the free amino groups in the protein molecule." By taking into account the possibility of a free amino group in arginine, this investigator believes that "the amount of acid absorbed by ordinary proteins is determined mainly by their content of lysine and arginine." In the oresent investigation it was considered to be of interest and iraoortance to make a careful study of a typical deaminized protein, i.e. deaminized casein, and to determine to what extent the amounts of various amino acids, the dis- tribution of nitrogen in the molecule, the metabolic behavior and other properties had been altered by the processes of deaminization. ; 1-i: , . ".. J1 ; ,. J , . I .» . i, •, i. -J '..-i ., ' ‘ A.,' •• .k' 'b ^1^.; ‘ , j ' _ :■„!• I'lVi'i HE •" ■ ,:" "" ' , ^"'^Ift "^rV' ‘C ■ *’ ' ii*'' '• Ie W, ' I ^ ' ' * ■ : . * .,. t •'t*' ' / ^ ^ t ^ ' I P^jp -c, : ^4' d«w. jJ r<‘>4 « V •?>’? e v«”lri ^/fr nt v J,'"- ^ '*i,r r’ '-’.yC'’’ ^ ‘ r- i'. r' ‘ f *T ' *' ^ '^1.'’'^' W, f-'v -.( • ■ ' ~v^^L ' ' '''ri'^v#!* p|w^ Hc- ,)JJ.,, . ’ ■ ‘Disj^ :' : 'T: . . * <\ I 5 . EXPERIMENTAL . A. The PreDaration of C asein and Deaminized Casein . Although the original observations on the preparation of casein from milk were made by Hoppe (11) in 1359, it remained for Hammarsten (12), in 1877, to accurately describe the pre- paration and nurification of this protein. Since that time various modifications (13) of Hammarsten ' s method have been proDOsed. The procedure used in the present study is an adaptation of the more modern methods for casein preparation. This method is given in detail. Two gallons of skim milk are added to 10 liters of distilled v/ater contained in a carboy of about 50 liters capacity. Dilute acetic acid, made by adding 6 c.c. of glacial acetic acid to a liter of distilled water, is very slowly added to this water-milk mixture, which is mixed uniformly by stirring with a current of air. After the addition of 5 to 6 liters of the acetic acid solution, the casein flocks out completely and settles ranidly to the bottom I of the carboy. The yellowish, supernatant liquid is siphoned off and the precipitated casein washed with 10 or more liters of distilled water; the supernatant liquid is again siphoned off and the washing process repeated. The casein remaining from the final washing is dissolved by the addition of a solution of dilute ammonium hydroxide, containing 6 c.c. of concentrated ammonium hydroxide to a liter of distilled water. About 7 liters of alkali will completely dissolve the casein liij I ' . il' - 4 ' ->«- .tZ-J-- '-i‘T - f ' f ». iv . ■ v.v. -■ , <.-fj i#; .'; ■. " 1 r f ,.t r t V I •' k ■ A' *•’ ■> V V : • : ‘ • ’ ‘ < 3 i'’ ' 5 . ') < 1 I 1 \ (■;''' ' ' • :;•••: y\'\bon ’n-.;v . ^-crfc f 0 «. •'■li. i.f/. / •••f'. C|, ^ . '! (' (,-t^ . : ;• "p j’. /?<• L i. *t ■ \,c ••. tcT’ ^ ••■: ; . ’ .' r-' ' . . , ' '-ti' ■ . ’ 'i-lf'C • : .. w n ■. , J! :: r. .Ili . TC ’ M. I , ? ‘ 11 h< - •'o ; •■ ■', C'i .' . T * " ' '' 'f -v’yJ'r : .'i:;-'.:: .^,X: ^ ^ijTrt.r''"^ ■'■■>::• . ^ c> -vibo liJ r\ :vi :%.\ v,J ■ 4.- »'•>• / r, ...» ' . • • V. -A’ ■i ’ f* t» ' ‘V' ' it'* >r: » • :. c \ ' r.. ^ » ; .IV.. Cd ' <'»j , *.--y \ •■ <. 'r ' .2 i '• J ' i’vvtfj^.''' '"* ' , . I I ' v‘t( 4 , I ■ ^ r '»' ■ U'! ■'('/" :< -i' ri .-.; r' ' V/. ('. ' ■ > f » • ' , w ' i- ''-, V r-f .4 .'. . 0 / ■ " 4 .V. . *y‘Xp' «.'■ '■". ickt'-‘.«ii' V .f ;'ri; r»v.,Y el ■ ' , I 'r^.r'C' f.’^: * . - >»: ■>.- ^ 1 1 • >- ti ■ ' 'C -'■ b I i F ’ f, i ■' c n ;, ; ■ ...V Vj ' 4 " 'C J /.;,• •■ ••»■'?,.•« .*• <. ., -1 i»i im» «sr-»vOr«i( to give an onalescent solution, which is then filtered through a thick layer of absorbent cotton. The whole process of pre- cipitating with acid and dissolving in alkali is repeated 3 times. After the last precipi tation, the casein is washed tvace with distilled v/ater, the sunernatant liquid decanted and the purified product filtered on a Buchner funnel using hardened filter naper and suction. The compact cake, which is formed, is triturated in a mortar with 95 % alcohol and the trituration with alcohol is repeated 3 times. After tritur- ating 3 times with dry ether to completely dehydrate the casein cake theproduct is dried for 3 hours in air and finally for 30 minutes in the oven at 80° C. The resulting white product may be powdered to a dust in a ball mill or by passing it through an 80 mesh sieve. Nitrous acid was first used as a deaminizing agent for proteins in 1885 by Loew (14). This investigator found that one-third of the nitrogen of peptones was liberated by the action of nitrous acid. In 1896 Paal (15) used silver nitrite and hydrochloric acid to deaminate gelatin peptones, while in the same year Schiff (16) obtained a straw yellow compound by the interaction of nitrous acid and egg albumin. Two years later SchrStter (17) observed the formation of a similar sub- stance from peptones. In 1908, Treves and Salomons (18) al- lowed nitrous acid to react with egg albumin and obtained a yellow product which they believed was diazo albumin. De- aminized gelatin was obtained by Blasel and iiatula (19) in 1914. ^-»V;<' '■ - * P^rtaq ,'*■0 : ' 4 i?X' ' ■-'■ ' ^ * ' 8 . *■ ' * ^ ^ ■ ‘^'; , * 1 ^, ■ * ‘ ' ' ' i I ■ \ ' “'Hl^j' • L^r-R.Mi kitivis rw-lw / • ' ^ '■*"■. . ■ 'v’%^ '-■ ■■..■'■' p- ' ti. ;^ ^o. i% . -j-rX'f 5 »X^t^y^orfl ftf®i:^-' I' K ’ >*■ rv' '"tf xi ■Br rv .V ^ '/''j,' -..Mv- V 1’ •■i',‘ .^--'^.T**" ; '• '• "' •'■^'iRi ^ftkV . ■% '•• '. ' :"*^,/,‘r *. * ' 1 • •> , , *a ■' ''i^ »\-rY*‘' •* * r‘*. . 1 Vl*<'J'oX-1>»K • i j.. 4,i- rf#|‘fr 6 1 -1 /vr-- ■;/?>• .■ . K'h^'-tijCif^' ' -^i,. tjtt.Hf)'. .' ■fi^v . ' /, • 1 ; . "■ ’ '•■ ';./> '•♦;^A' 7 e ifAriiVf?' _ ^ ; 7 J '*’ ■ ' ■' . i , ,^.. /■ ■ ;■ ,;. '■' ..'• 'T-// '■' ^ ' .' - y-*-'- 1 ' - -■ A”' A‘ it ' ■ ‘ 4 '"'. •*■'■ ' . #> ' , ^' '* <'' '-i'^’i ■ •*' ■ '*' 'i ■ * ■ ■' ''i^ jK f fi*''-L-fe« /’0r\ ..r. ■♦ ihl •'? ,'.' :' '' * ' *^' •' '' ''V jf ‘y' "'' *' /'■ ' '^'■' ■ ^ ' - ' ■ •' ’ht^n ewoi' -I \ '. -s »::V . .t. u xA '' A, ■ < "5 • 1 . . ,^ .. . ;...,^. ii t ^ T* fij'itp* (%iii .. . x> ■ ']?■ 7 . SkrauD (20)and his pupils have prepared and studied the deaminized products of the following proteins: casein (1); gelatin (21); albumin (22); globulin (23); and edestin (24). Deaminized albumin, gelatin, and casein (25) and deaminized gliadin and vitellin (26) have been prepared and investigated by Levites. Levites and Skraup have been largely responsible for perfecting the methods used in preparing deaminized protein products. In the first (25) method of Levites, a paste made from the nrotein and sodium nitrite was warmed on the water bath with dilute acetic acid and the resulting olive green product was dried in vacuo. In his second (25) procedure, Levites produced an emulsion of the protein by agitating it vigorously in a shaking machine with 10^ acetic acid. This emulsion was warmed gently on the water bath with a 10^ solu- tion of sodium nitrite and the resulting yellow product fil- tered, washed with alcohol and ether and dried in vacuo. In the method used by Skraup (1) an acid solution of the protein, prepared by adding glacial acetic acid to a uniform suspension of the protein in water, was warmed gently with sodium nitrite on the water bath and the yellow product drained off on linen, desiccated and dried in air. In the present series of experiments deaminized casein was prepared according to the methods outlined by Levites and by Skraup. It was difficult to obtain a product of uniform color and appearance while the yield of 70 percent reported by Skraup was rarely exceeded. There are several objections to the use of a shaking machine as employed by Levites. It . V* _ . . iti;SM, jyr: ■ (sf V * ' ' ■' ,. ,. fT'>, It'.,- ^ ^ ■’ ■' ■*.• • ■ . ■ ■’ ' ■ "” I' • ^ " 14 M'LA.(^ 0 ^d ■» iuc^ T ' ' «r ' ' '’,: . s? '.s,' V " ■ . , , ri-^tut'o >’nV- rriXjAfoI'^ ;,(^) /fiiVa^iT^* k. -^' ^ T •'■ . J V '; V.. J\% ,'■' ■ ■ >■♦■•’ v’. " ®. ' ^' ■«'"'f i ■’ ?fFi> t)' I tj" ' * ;■ ■ fi * ■ .' ^ -^ .- =- ‘V _ 'i- ' JKmi If'’ Vv .^! . . w . y •' «: ‘ ‘•^ '■' ' * - ’ ivffjpf cH ^wl&■c$a= rr; . ono.itv.! c? t: e- 4 -it^' >19 aw 4^j/r^• ■■■?W. ' \ . •: -‘ ■■.«tJC:-«^^’r-^ ( i rio /; r#i'...-6ul>wfe<^i’ ,/Jfc.,. T' ^ . J' .,'• ' >■ ••^n:''^> '.;v: ■;;.« -rO •*•,, a . ^ 4 / ' •■'.Va'’’ ' . . % :/#^ i•^ ’•• ‘73 .-jA. , * . * i' '* 4 ^'- I ^1 ' ^ 'vRSiI .. . j . - '' F. ft '-’.Xu 'l„^^yfC‘<^:’ :|f»i •'>1^ , ^ ., , ;■ ,:-♦ V '.■ ■* . •>*-*^. V-’ ■l:i'‘-!^"c-i'^l ji.- ■ •■>■' ' ' • *• •. f . ' ’■*•' ■ ■'*• tf. ■./'■^ ■" "i Hv *5 ii'-J/,, ...-/"’I'l-r'tr?’''' !'•*'•■'** * / ” ,v 0 ;o ‘- '.!JJ I- - . . ■ f ' •' t\' *^.. ’’■ *1 ,, -l**' - " /J^m'y' . * / ^ JW- * ■ ^ 8 . requires several hours to emulsify small amounts of protein and the emulsified product invariably contains gelatinous lumps which must he ground uo in a mortar to avoid contamin- ation of the deaminized product with unchanged protein. All of the methods used for the nraparation of deaminized pro- teins employ heat up to 40° C. to effect complete deaminiza- tion of the protein. It is possible that this apolication of heat may cause a slight hydrolysis of the protein. It is believed that the following procedure overcomes the objections cited above. 100 grams of casein were added to 2 liters of distilled water contained in a 5-liter Pyrex flask. After stirring vigorously for 30 minutes with an electric stirrer a uniform suspension of the protein resulted. To this suspension 140 c.c. of glacial acetic acid were added dropwise, with continued stirring, during the course of 1.5 hours. At the expiration of 20 minutes a good emulsion was formed while at the end of the period a solution was effected. To this solution, 500 c.c. of a solution of sodium nitrite containing 80 grams to a liter was added dropwise, with con- tinued stirring, during the space of 1.5 hours. After 150 c.c. of this solution had been added a deep yellow precipitate rose to the top of the liquid as a yellow layer which, after standing for 18 hours, was filtered on a Buchner using suction and a hardened filter paper. After triturating this substance 15 times with hot water to the disappearance of an acid re- action to litmus, it was granular and light yellow in color while the aqueous filtrate was similarly colored. The yellow '/ i h precipitate obtained by triturating four times with 95 % alcohol was thoroughly desiccated by triturating three times with dry ether, drying in air for 30 minutes and in the oven at 80° C. for an equal length of time. Although the alcoholic filtrate was highly colored the precipitate appeared to have lost but little of its yellow color in the washing process. The deaminized product was of a uniform color and appearance and it was possible to secure practically a com- plete transformation into the deaminized form. From three 100-gram samples of the original casein yields of 90, 95 and 97.5 grams of the oven dried product were obtained. These deaminized products designated subsequently as deaminized caseins A-64, A-66 and A-68 were very fine and pov/dery when passed through an 80-mesh sieve. They were colored light yellow when first prepared but surfaces exposed to the light for a time became light brown. With the second method of Levites, 17 grams of deaminized casein (A - 18) were prepared from 15 grams of casein. How- ever, instead of permitting a complete deaminization to occur, the white precipitate which was formed upon the addi- ! tion of the sodium nitrite solution was filtered on a Buchner ! as soon as possible. This precipitate which was triturated 14 times with hot water, 3 times with 95^ alcohol, and twice with dry ether, was only faintly colored yellow. 10 . B. The ProT)ertles of Deamlnl zed Proteins . 1. Color. Without exceotion, the deaminized protein nroducts cited in the literature are yellow in color. Treves and Salomons (18) believed that these substances were diazo derivatives since they responded to the reactions given by diazo compounds. It is known, however, that primary aliphatic amines do not react with nitrous acid under ordinary condi- tions to give stable diazo derivatives. On the other hand, were this a reaction with the amide groups which are nresent acids would be produced (27) and not diazo products. There- fore, the assum-ntion of these authors seems untenable. It is possible that deaminized proteins are colored be- cause of the formation of nitroso compounds. There are numer- ous possibilities for nitrosation in the protein molecule. Histidine, tryptophane and proline each have one imino nitro- gen, while there are two such nitrogens in the guanidine group of arginine. Phenyl alanine would admit of nitrosation in the para position of its benzene nucleus, while a nitroso group might enter tyrosine in the position ortho to the hy- droxy group in the benzene ring. It is unlikely that a nitro- sation of the imide nitrogen making un the peptide linkage has taken nlace because this imide is probably of insufficient basicity, due to the neutralizing action of the adjacent car- bonyl group, to react with nitrous acid. However it has re- cently been sho\vn (23) that the nitroso derivative of methyl phthalimidine is easily formed by treatment with nitrous acid in water solution. Since the carbonyl imide linkage present in methyl phthalimidine is the same as that found in peptides 11 a possible nitrosation of the peptide linkage is suggested. However, this cannot have taken place to any narked extent because deaminized nroteins have been shown to contain less nitrogen than the original substances. Preliminary to carrying out some qualitative exneriments upon several nure amino acids, it was found that the red solu- tion formed by the action of nitrous acid upon phenol responds to Liebermann’s nitroso reaction by giving a green solution with concentrated sulnhuric acid. Tyrosine was found to give a similar reaction after warming the solution gently while indole reacts in much the same way although the resulting color is of lesser intensity. Histidine and phenyl alanine give no red color with sodium nitrite and glacial acetic acid but upon the further addition of concentrated sulphuric acid a green color is nroduced. It would appear from tnese tests that the yellow to brown color of deaminized proteins may be due in part to nitroso derivatives of tyrosine and possibly tryptophane. Prom the fact that gelatine, a tyrosine free protein, is renorted to give yellow deaminized derivatives, it would seem that this color cannot be due alone to the | formation of nitroso derivatives of tyrosine. However, it is well known that samples of gelatin, considered to be tyrosine free, still respond to Millon's test and Dakin (29) has re- cently found traces of tyrosine in all specimens of gelatin examined. 2. Solubility. Deaminized proteins are reported to be insoluble in water and insoluble or only slightly soluble in alkalies. Skraup noted the formation of a jelly-like substance " — " -«i r'lTipr'. ’ ’T- ■ L, >■ - -; ■ ■ ‘ "•»■. 'Tv'.^a ■ . ..?r; p v '*v ^ ^V>i’ !' S”. ’ 7' ’ ' . . ■' J .■ ..'•>; '• ■ ^ ' ’ i 4' P mtQi f: rthcffCJ i . ‘ -' ' -Ki,y N :V ^ ■■^'-''ilJ ' ■' "" rrtitfc'dtfi » f| .^J r ^ . ; ■ , t - 7 iuwjii!i;.<'i , (.ad'fjfer '<--v'tdi.4' a-r'-^iV*v ‘.^c? 41^ ,04 ,v,'iAWii'iBl,ifii'^^i •S jL*-" j_ ?-rrirp 6 '^r>j iiyiti/bl '^’iiP i‘^> .; . ‘'r . ^ B ?• 0>|.^occs)-'t Icd^rlt;. ^ ‘■njcri.r f\> ^ -V' • . •" 7:- • iX'i.? • -^\: ■ z *1‘. tC-y i-..\'.^ ^ rxld jj;f03 ffd I ' ■ .^ ' c „ '■‘'•■v- ■/ ;-'•- ' ■ ■■ .-, 6 v ^r-. (X' - 4 ?Ti'jP'r ;.:Vu 7 i^ "^’Ti-rjtfcfXi-n VJSftit.yxd rt«r «Q© ‘ r ';^ r ^ ', / . 1 I i m L?\ “ 5»i3r>i«!i' 'Vi*5 ' ,eit6X>Pi"S\‘7» ^-.,< .;’^ ■ •■ >. ■ .V P. “ ' ■ r'-:yty Y^: "i vjnrtf^ ^n/- {-r^fi.-L. a. Id .\?fi tb :,^>^7;i»foo\r/ '* \ ‘ * ' \ ' ■^‘’ ■r?tW 1 *' ’ '■'?.• '■ '<■' 0 • £i.i6^ i* fUfir'iC;'. ' ' jT c>itd'nc..s^:lHpffg't{.'^ '*lc 'jyd4 Si .•. • '■• ’ ’ ■ ^’- ; ‘ "o < i 'p.. r ■C’ - • I O'* "''. ' ' .•■/'• ■ ' I ■ V ■. : .**■■• * -’. ' i"K^ia'‘ ^ ' -. f •■ ■■ •■■• ■ ^.v '.tt.- '-' • 'Vv •' ■ '.■• ■ i >1* ■' r .el:?- % •X ' ^'■’ I H,/: -ft k V' ji. ■?■ . .•: rto '■'aavi-'d 4 ^,y^^'f.v^ trt- *^0 • >j^‘ a d!! H f ■. □ ^•- ' V -. . ■ ■ ■ .;i ' '■ / ■ ; •'■/■ * " ^^■■^^ fc" • ; , • 'J;, , ;; . ' / to ■ ‘ t;y ■' - .v'*:.; * ..■: yyy .W'. tm^gs^^n a ei m ¥mmm i i iig y^Bt O na* ' ■n 4 i.*A 4 . Tr^n .v" 12 . when deaminized proteins were brought into contact with strong alkali. It was found in the present investigation that de- aminized casein dissolved in .5^ sodium hydroxide after standing for two days with the formation of a red solution and a small amount of undissolved residuum. With 1.5!^ sodium hydroxide solution, a red solution was formed in 24 hours, while with concentrated alkali an orange to brown jelly was formed in a fev; minutes. 3. Color Reactions. Deaminized casein prepared ac- cording to the method described above, gave positive tests with the Hopkins-Cole , biuret and Millon's reagents. Millon's test was unquestionably positive, although the color was less intense than with casein, but the biuret reaction with de- aminized casein was not characteristic ranging from a pink to a reddish purnle color. Levites is the only investigator to report a positive Millon's reaction with deaminized proteins, while the biuret reaction was found to be positive by Levites and by Treves and Saloraone. If it be true that deaminized proteins give a positive biuret reaction, this would indicate that the amide grouping which is responsible for the color is not attacked or at least is only partially destroyed by the action of nitrous acid. This grouping, according to Schiff , is two CONH groups in union. 4. Composition. The elementary composition of native proteins appears to be but little altered in the deaminiza- tion process. Skraup (20) found a slight diminution in the phosphorous content of deaminized casein and a constant in- crease, with one excention, in the oxygen content of all of Pwf ' ■ . • V ' . T ^T'; •J r’' •' C 'l ' ■ *. 7' un ' inir . f«;.-'v'v^: ■.('»! ; X '■ ncrc'. 13. li the deaminized -oroteins studied hut neither observation was considered to be of particular signif icance . It is striking, however, that the nitrogen content of deaminized proteins is lower than that of the original substance. Schiff (16) re- ports a reduction of 1 percent in the values for nitrogen while the figures quoted by Skraup (20) range from .51 to 1.24 per cent lov/er in nitrogen than those of the original proteins. In the case of edestin (24) for some unaccountable reason the nitrogen of the deaminized product was found to be higher than that of the original protein. It will be noted from Table I that the nitrogen content of the deaminized casein prepared in this research ranges for the various sa’^nles from .22 to .68 per cent lower than the figures given for the original casein. TABLE I. Nitrogen calc, on Samnle Ash an ash free basis io Casein 1 .38 14.56 Deaminized casein A-18 .96 13.91 Deaminized casein A-64 1.21 14.34 Deamini zed casein A-66 .53 13.88 Deaminized . casein . A-63 .49 14.01 5. Free Amino Nitrogen. The first apnlication of the reaction between nitrous acid and amino compounds was made by Sachsse and Korraann (30) in 1874. The volume of nitrogen lib- erated by the action of nitrous acid upon plants was considered 14 . to be a measure of the amide grouos present. In more recent times Brown and Willar (31) have studied this reaction further and have made certain improvements unon the apparatus used by the original investigators. It remained, however, for Van Slyke (32) in 1909 to perfect the method for purifying and measuring the nitrogen evolved in this reaction. Because of the fact that amides react very slowly or not at all with nitrous acid under the conditions employed, it is believed that the nitrogen liberated from proteins and from protein derivatives comes entirely from the primary aliphatic amines existing free in the molecule. The determination of the free amino nitrogen of native proteins is one of the many applications (33) which have been made of the Van Slyke procedure. In the present study of native proteins and their derivatives, the free amino nit- rogen of casein, deaminized casein and gelatin was determined according to the method outlined by Van Slyke (34) and using the micro apparatus. To a suspension of 3 grams of the pro- tein in distilled water was added a solution containing .375 grams of sodium carbonate. The proteins went completely in solution usually within an hour. This protein solution was transferred to a 100 c.c. volumetric flask, diluted to the mark and 2 c.c. taken for amino nitrogen analysis. The casein or gelatin solution formed in this manner is neutral to litmus and Van Slyke (34) has shown that an inappreciable hydrolysis takes place even after standing at room temperature for 48 hours. In the deaminization of casein a foam inhibitor was found to be indispensable . For this purpose, caprylic 15 . alcohol was found to he more effective than di phenyl ether, although the blank resulting from the former substance was, as has been recorted (35), considerably higher than that given by di phenyl ether. Even without the caprylic alcohol, the blank from the sodium nitrite was in general higher than that reported by Van Slyke for good samples of this substance. Casein was found to nrecipitate from solution immediately upon contact with the acid solution in the deaminizing cham- ber and to gradually change from a pure white to yellow. Because of the fact that casein must undergo deamini zation while in the solid state reliable results are to be obtained only by maintaining constant conditions. Uniform results were secured by shaking the deaminizing chamber for 30 minutes at 300 vibrations ner minute. Gelatin is not precioi tated by the acid solution of the deaminizing chamber and does not im- part a color to the liquid during the process of deaminization . Van Slyke (3) has renorted that the free amino nitrogen of casein comnrises 5.51 ner cent of its total nitrogen con- tent. Since there are various methods which are used for the preparation of casein from cow's milk, it was considered of importance to determine the free amincjbi trogen of samples of casein prepared in a variety of ways on the assumption that the reagents emnloyed in the purification of this protein might possibly have altered its free amino groups. However, the results which were obtained (see Table II) were not widely divergent and it would seem that the reagents employed in the prenaration of these samples of casein were without appreciable influence unon the number of free amino groups Vi- irtif f* ' I ‘ ^ \ *■ '.-' ^' , . S'y ‘ ■ VV ;.t'-; '0iije£rOt»,y d ^ I ' ■, ' '' . -Jp. -\ ■ ,'T-'' ‘■■‘♦Jr , 8 ‘' i • * ' ’.'f:'/^Y% *_‘rt--A>*r ' ^ ^ .’1 I* ffu r W “'^Ur'JOsrV) a.- ^*rf. ■ " _ . ' ..^^■•'t' /^.J t , I 'r f 16. of this protein. It should be noted, however, that the average figure for the free amino nitrogen content of ten samnles of casein was found to be 5.37 ner cent which is only slightly higher than the 5.51 per cent reported by Van Slyke . Casein A-18, which was only slightly yellow in color, was prepared by treatment with nitrous acid but was removed from the influence of this reagent as soon as nossible after nrecipi tation . The color reactions given by this nroduct were unquestionably nositive and quite comparable to the re- actions given by casein itself. As is given in Table II, the free amino nitrogen of this product was 3.10 per cent of the total nitrogen, while that of completely deaminized casein A-64 was 0.0. Since the value for casein A-18 lies midway between that given by unchanged casein on one hand and com- pletely deaminized casein on the other, it would seem that at the time of nrecipi tation only partial deamini zation had occurred. The free amino nitrogen content of two samples of gelatin was determined and found to be 5.29 and 5.41 per cent of the total nitrogen figure. These values are in agreement with the figure, 5.2 per cent, which was reported by Felix (7) but differ from the nercent, 3.12, found by Van Slyke (3). 6. Total Amino Nitrogen. The conditions necessary for the complete hydrolysis of proteins have been determined. Comparable results have been secured by heating in an auto- clave at 150 ° C. for 1.5 hours with 3.0 N hydrochloric acid (37) and by boiling at 100*^ C. for 24 to 43 hours with 20^ 1 17 . TABLE II. Casein, Casein, Casein, Casein, Casein, If II ft If ft The Free Amino Nitrogen Content of Casein, Deaminized Casein and Gelatin. Percent of total nitrogen Samnles as free amino nitrogen Kahlhaum 5.61 Kahlhaum nach Hammersten 5.99 after Van Slyke and Bosworth (13) 5.63 after Baker and Van Slyke (36) 5.52 Oshorne (# ) No. 1 6.13 ” "2 5.84 " ”3 6.24 ” ”4 6.22 " "5 6.04 " ”6 5.47 'Deaminized* casein, A-18 3.10 Deaminized casein, A-64 .00 Gelatin, renurified Gold Seal 5.29 Gelatin, Gold Seal 5.41 # Casein samples No. 1 to No. 6 were secured through the kindness of Prof. T. B. Osborne of the Connecticut Agriculture Experiment Station, New Haven, Connecticut. In every case unusual procedures were used in the prepara- tion of these samnles. -w. k: r •( V ■V,., &, * ^ w '■r:.r . ( f i . V ('f' y I ' • < ■ r • ^ • . ' » ► T -»x-m , ‘U, ti.'Ti I.' : c ; i' r> _ T;t- o. ■ r. i . > . . ''■■ ’'■ ■ji' ■ / Jr. < . - ,;■ \>3.i 18 . hydrochloric acid (r58). With either of these methods the maximum amount of amino nitrogen is liberated from peptide linkage but according to Van Slyke there is less tendency towards deaminization of amino acids, particularly cystine (39), at 100° C. than at 150 or 160° C. Complete hydrolysis of 5-gram samoles of casein and deam- inized casein was effected by autoclaving for 3 hours at 124° C. with 200 c.c. of 3.0 N hydrochloric acid. Henriques and Gjaldb8,k (37) found that under these conditions the results of hydrolysis were anproximately the same as those obtained by heating for 1.5 hours at the higher temperature. In both cases some undissolved narticles remained after autoclaving and the supernatant liquid of the deaminized casein was color- ed a deeper brown than that obtained from casein. Each hydrol- ysate was evaporated to dryness on the water bath, taken up with water and diluted to the mark in a 500 c.c. volumetric flask. Amino nitrogen analyses were made on 1 c.c. portions of the hydrolysates by means of the Van Slyke micro apparatus. The total amino nitrogen of casein was found to be 10.08 per cent of its total nitrogen content while 9.84 per cent of the total nitrogen of deaminized casein was present in the amino form. Since the difference observed between these per cents isprobably within the range of experimental error, it is believed that the total amino nitrogen of casein and de- aminized casein is the same. The Tyrosine Content of Deaminized Proteins . Despite the fact that some investigators have obtained a ■> 'V, '.: i: i ■: .'• OC •••C'j'.i :/c.l .••1 i.; -v^' e. r, V' { •*/!’’ ' v‘ir-,!' , i », « r* rf. : f* I . > i r) w i>4- fUU^/ V 'X- i 'i ■■I .• • .’••■• / • '.' i , '■’ ' f, r ■•..■^f T ■ ii-i i '''0 •.'•• lSjI ••£•.'• .V'.'iJ r“J ui.:. • " 'lo .r ■ / .A r •'* ( ^ I '. r-< i 'yi H ' t\ e- :. i . -1', t r. . -'}^! ^ .J '■■‘I M ^ • • -V, ' > ♦’ 'xr'i.r* j' t’,'' ./■■• ^ .', r.'l :.<;<: ;.- ‘ i- i j r ;/■. ,,v,, ' , t '■• •I 'w '*''-p'.'f>Xl i'. ^ .^r:Pij', ;, ., f’l; fK.-5'.- .: . ■!.,"■ Ci r*' ■ , C"'! li.; 7* J" •-,V "Of’ r' n ; :v'i:vT t»rO' ’^'f .•.T 'f' Off-^jj'vv . ’ T'-r ; c . ^ -.^f. - i , •'*>''' cTfe?. '■’^ S' ' ' < f“ir.s ' 'i; 0' r\j^y vvf:‘' ' •' ’M'- .•; y;c ''Afnl .• .V C f'** /?OT .1 OrMtcl ■ ' r ‘ ' ■ ■’■ f. ft' 0 -iL r« 7 '. p. .ri .i u ^* *^ ■ *' ' ’ f.- ■>; it-r. Ir: ,■ .1 ■■’Wiir* ; '. v' • i : 0< r>. : c \ s^.. '•■ ■ .<> u-^stiuoi: I V > ■ ..JV.’;* V* i '.„ iAV« ill " 19 . positive Millon’s reaction with deaminized proteins the statement has been made that "Von den Monoaminos&uren ist zu sagen, dass ihr Gehalt quantitativ wahrscheinlich unverS,ndert hleibt, mit Ausnahme des Tyrosins, das bei alien Desaminido- nroteinen fehlt," (26). This conclusion is based largely upon the work of Skraun (l) who could not obtain crystalline tyrosine from deaminized proteins although other amino acids were isolated in amounts comnarable to those present in the original protein. Since deaminized casein was found to give a positive Millon's test in the present study, the^resence of tyrosine would seem to be indicated. That this assumption was correct was definitely proved by the following experiment. Ten-gram samples of casein and deaminized casein were hydrolyz- ed for 12 hours with 200 c.c. of 20 % sulphuric acid. Some of the humin which was formed was removed from the hydrolysates by filtering on fluted filter papers. The sulphuric acid was neutralized with a suspension of nure barium hydroxide and the resulting white precioitate of barium sulphate was filtered on fluted filter pacers. After concentrating both solutions upon the water bath until a scum of barium salts began to form ucon the surface of the deaminized protein solution the excess of barium was removed by precipitation with dilute sulnhuric acid solution. Since a water clear filtrate could not be obtained the barium sulphate was allowed to settle out in tall cylinders and the clear supernatant liquid, which was tinged slightly yellow in each case, was siphoned off. Both filtrates were concentrated upon the , ,, t"' ;^.'.-u ; vJ^j#fjr;.3U i- III V 'W' '■■ ’’ ' .*. V.c'^' •*'• ■ ' ’ , (T 'i.. ' ->i '( V . i-.tjii 1 1111*1^ . ■i ,'. , T-l ,; bt»5 ■/:r-iitr.f' f:- ' <*:bL) •..;•■ -r ;r.;^ .’ r;- u ..! ' /•r.r tif;- . rri;b .*y.r\ *' i.t'r’v* f n *'\'V' v I.' .{.»r .! ••* I :-:c^;r .rit:i0* 't k-., r> »i r & S*' ;o ir twcffo !y •y*. ‘'i ', ^r; - ::r.T , (Hi^y X:'oy fro i-b--rcr ‘.'.n’j cfi'’ jc-' / • j w- •?’■ •'?;'■?: /.-I/ ’ bP:'i; •:- ' . ' vrb ' .• ^7 n f ^ •*' :r //V I «•; * .*•'. tW ?■ / I . ■ _ ' ■ I, J 1 r. t; .b r:;l w-v-'ccryff# ■ r.- .?«J ' -oSi.hn r • :<■: r . ■ ' -X J rC. r «'... ::•■ i 0"^ev.' '“i'O f.’ '. f ’■■ i i;. • 'J -‘I - • ' if i '•y7'^.i‘\t'.i t. ; .i cf,,/ rjtrtX^.* -• -» . » > 1 . »-S,' X ■ . • . . •> • ^ » i. ■ ^ * V .. r ' ■ r U'bxfe " Jil^-'O ’ J i , L- * ! ‘ V • 1 1 1 1 , r r j' - 1* 4 t .' • ■;ti'^, .'Of: i L'.’ f 1 .'.'Li.T'- ■ jb'. z i'.bi.yo‘X' : : • 'fix •• 'i 0 r <: ■;' '"fV vjs c’f'Sy.^ n ■ ' ■ ' rr-.i Z .11 Jf • ' O.L.r.bV' .v/j'Xb'Off e' .1 ■’ ■ *T ' - ■ . c cj rx^chy. 'y.uotf', .. . - i' ’ b ■“> o':)Ci‘T . '.<■. bjSvj r nirr^-] n€> V ' . ' ■ |<4 ■ ,m ,4 •■ w ' , ^■'11 ■ ’ty r ’•a*' i" V rf'-i'f C. A.^ U f-J r •. ■ .. • ■ : ■ K'^J ' ' "y;- ' -'I ^ i;;':* - \. ' .!•' ': -'■/ / ' .V rijof.'.f i. : X;-, .".tfj-b ‘ / I* « ' V<‘ Vi 1 20 . water bath until crystallization had begun. After standing overnight the mother liquors were filtered on a Buchner funnel and the crystals of tyrosine sucked dry. The impure tyrosine from casein was tinged a grayish white while the deaminized product was yellow but after recrystallization from hot water, the tyrosine obtained from each source was pure white. No effort was made to obtain a quantitative yield of tyrosine from casein and deaminized casein. However, the amount of this amino acid isolated from the latter protein seemed only slightly less than that obtained from casein. The amino acid isolated from casein and deaminized casein was identified by its crystalline form. In addition the color reactions with Millon's and Mftrner's reagents were positive. Prior to 1912, the quantitative estimation of the ty- rosine in proteins was carried out by isolation of the pure substance. Abderhalden (40) found 4.5 per cent of tyrosine in casein and this is the figure which is usually quoted. In 1912, the discovery that the blue color given by a solu- tion of phospho tungstic and phosphomolybdic acids with phenols was specific for the phenol group, led to the development of Polin’ s (41) colorimetric method for the determination of tyrosine in proteins. Although tyrosine is the only amino acid in the protein molecule which has this groaning, Abder- halden (42) found that this blue color was also given by tryptophane, oxy tryptophane and oxy proline. However, Johns and Jones (43) have shown that the blue color with tryptophane was less intense than that given by an equivalent amount of k '•*- r*i: -' ' , M ' - . - y r. '1-- t f V » * , ^ ■ '/ '1.. i &fk :JJ .. ' r ■ k .' : J A ; ' -1 '■/: Oi:' . ,•■ - :■ k /■: ' ., ■^' fv: r i. V V i ;■ /'it' " '.« tvi J ■,. ■■ ' 1 . ■ , • - ■ I'V-ii' \ Xrf '. J* C ' . V i ' t'r. /T 1 1 XC'iOVi- rj'' . r*'! ' -'i ■' < pV t W -Jd LX'ii '"'C ■' '.j .' _N'. . ■ J! jO • ^ • V t-' ' 1 •' • ** ' •/ 'i.r 1’’’ a.' :vili'’: e*iL-v, t;-'t'.''-i'JL J-'i "©r f i? ‘. irnf'ivo -.1 ^•r^^••^MVv• •' o r'. r,-ciTv ^ .•:■./ to?*’/ t.j " ,v> Jorf , y 1 J: - ‘^r ,7 'i^e-iv iff ' . r.‘wy *lv f/i • ' • • . :.; j- ')<' v» r -r ; 'Jr: ■ f :i V '■ ' Divine ■ i- ■ nr'' KfW! '•1 ',r , ’'i; i'"--’ 'i •■foZoo ' ’ ' ; >'• n I., • ■ / 'iv . n^' r \ ■■ ' ■ j J># V ? i- •-•; ' , -‘•r J ; , t. 'J. fv ■. r' 'n':^ r:i i' rl -irJ'c:: : yr ■:picf-f;r ^ i ' J ' ' ■ ■^.'■ ' •.;.i^'.iiir,^*' j'.rf-v.: wcrr''* ,1U'. •'■ '.Cfti v i.: ■ ■ ■ n rt^ tJ ' ' ’ ' ' '■ ' . ^ r, '. ,31 ■it. , ■ Ar-, jrv ¥ .' . ' ' '»■ ; • ' ' . I , , i, > it-J _ J tx ■ ^f i . " ' ^ .'1 • ' :'• ' ■■ . ' ''•■ • *.'4 c i f-rt.k Jt” ■ I' I j r>n'irx....‘ i ll-l • ‘ >/' ‘i *.>'•; 'u .'• ■'•• t '■ ■> c'rr* '' i . > ' . J,C' . — o: >vV-.> , ; .p K^j. ■ .* .V ,. I :f; .;■ ' «/ ' ■'•'•■• . ••••' •' ■ .<■' t:\‘ Mr>©'''V' -ivTc';- i rj • J5f^ c t i '. V . ^ f ■ '. I '■'•■.■■ : f''=r. • V n ¥ r>.u‘'3 .-,. ■ ,TM ' I I ’ !■' ^ *"■' ■ , -■■ ,- ■^' ',' iv,! I r « #''*- -»^ "'■ •-Va*'^'-’ • \V' "«ffir aIS® r,vi ■ ' * 'V ** ■ -i, T- .• ^ '■■■'• ’ ■ *■ 'm\> ,» '. vriva lie ^ K v-i ■ .,. ', '. - V' . •■;■■■' i ’“'Eji; V- ' -■'^' ' ■: 70‘Elffc rV’l „ . bhjjri "'iV iifi i.^''C^s';*:i- ,.tjrjjj^\t ^to^X 4'pric"-*tofr ii* i , ,p i!?-. .,. , ,,^,i'.v , a- ■ l' - ' V'-* '■ * L -, — ^ ''* I , *■ ■ k>L ■ ' «• Ult’'' ■ ■■-,■* V' ‘ '5^ ’ • ■ - ■' a « v""- ' ^ r elc'* .u/ip<3fj!x/£. ’’r ■'j'f ’ ffi • ' '*' ' 'i, ^ { <• - '/-i ‘k 'j *'-'•■•.•, ' ':4^ &•; &' *’-*^ • v^,(^SfV' VA fc vmx^f: ,S;r ' ki ^ X*i - rr(>i-^ ftWroc ^ii fe- •*- r*?..‘ <■ ,'v;'' *'.. '.\^ - - vifti' •;’•:•'» ... ';'4lH&1^f-' ' i»v.,.i ‘ .‘ ‘■■T'yi 1^ ; r ' •'. •• t ■.*' . ‘_ • -'^ - & .; '.-15-, 'v r "'.k'ft * . •’;, .1-^ ■■■■.' > pcf a4 -ffi¥f a^ . 'tKlAi jgpffi ?j f-., 1, •*>-‘' . j , , . ' , , • ■’, j'.., : ■ .' > ■ t » EKH 4 a» a - jit .'iiifi'Ss i^i^taja^.-afc„ -ajirf. I . sV Ju'>0 vwt /I ' ■ ^ ^ ^ - ' ,4 . ■' *- \y^\ ' . '■ ',,- ■ ■ ‘' • ;'- ' - ' ' "' ,; •' •jj'i jRiCf’jrb'r ©irL/y^bicr nlatfj '■ ii . ’V, 1'- 'Y ' ' '„ 'V‘ 2'3. In 1899 Hausmann (45) determined the amide nitrogen, the di amino nitrogen and the mono amino nitrogen of various proteins. Many criticisms (46) of the methods used in esti- mating the nitrogen nresent in these forms have "been made and the value of the results has been questioned. The chief difficulties seemed to lie in the accurate estimation of the amide nitrogen and in the quantitative separation of the hexone bases and cystine from the mono amino acids. Imnrove- ments upon the original method of Hausmann and that developed by Kossel and Kutscher (47) culminate in the well known Van Slyke (48) procedure for the partition of protein nitrogen. Although in general the Van Slyke procedure was followed in the nresent investigation of the distribution of nitrogen in casein and deaminized casein, certain modifications v/ere incorporated from unpublished results of Grindley and Hamil- ton. In each case 6 grams of casein or deaminized casein were taken for dunlicate analysis and these samplos were hydrolyzed in the usual manner. It was considered to be ad- vantageous to distill off the excess hydrochloric acid in vacuo before removing an aliquot portion for the estimation of total nitrogen. By the use of a dual system for vacuum distillation duplicate determinations were ’’ade under exactly the same conditions of nressure. The apparatus for arginine, as modified by Grindley and Hamilton permits the passage of purified air through it during the entire six hours. Air under pressure is passed through a purifying train of con- centrated sulphuric acid and concentrated alkali to remove carbon dioxide and ammonia and thence to the bottom of the ;«■: t ■ • i ■ » Zx !»' • '’ '> !?v t, . V t- I '* -i ■ \ '-' ■ i» ■'' . i j X. >' ; V,. filJDi.^^V '5v. ■.(;| opimjfe .■*' ■ f^nir.Vt :.Xa/%>fll'-' • fpCl^ ,tp s^'E^^dl. . V TRi-'" ^^' .-■ V ■’ ■'' ' v_ . : ','V‘^Ka , 7’’ TJi*3l.v'^ '■■■’•'’ ■Mr - ■/ '"- ' ' ', ‘ , ■ S‘ ■ ' ', ' 'i»^pS'4» pii,i.f'^^-.sf» 'tfi' efi;A3::2 ; 'V v W ■ . 24 . Kjeldattl flasks by means of a capillary glass tube which pass- es through the stonoer in the Kjeldahl flask. It was found that if a bubble of air per second is allowed to escape from the Folin bulbs that the last traces of ammonia are aerated into the standard acid and subsequent distillation as recommended in the original nrocedure is unnecessary. It has recently been shorn (49) that arginine loses one-half of its nitrogen as amino nitrogen by the action of nitrous acid at 20® C. for 2 or 3 hours. This observation leads Sekine to believe that the formula for the calculation of histidine nitrogen should be 3/2 (D- l/2 arginine nitrogen) instead of 3/2 (D-3/4 arginine nitrogen). Although the de- tailed renort of this investigation is not available, it would seem that the action of nitrous acid upon arginine for 2 or 3 hours is not comnarable to the 30 minute reaction em- ployed in the Van Slyke procedure. Therefore there appears to be no justification for altering the formula for the cal- culation of histidine nitrogen. In the present investigation the Van Slyke form.ula was used. The figures for the distribution of nitrogen in casein and deaminized casein are given in Tables IV and V. On the basis of these figures the percents of arginine, histidine, lysine and cystine present in these proteins was calculated. These results are given in Table VI. The incomplete recovery of nitrogen in the first analysis was probably due to losses in mono amino nitrogen. ■ The analysis for casein agrees rather closely with the figures quoted in the literature (50) 1 _ , •* • ' ?f :7 " ; ■ i ‘ ■*’ ■' \ ■ '■■ ' i. .., i:v.!*'?-w ,<: ..',.i: 5 ^ /'i ■■Sr/'.^.M. ■{ r>. fT 4 >. . Vtf ~ r«. 41; .. 1 €=^4 it . fer.poit^f; li. (t, 'll?- , i ■ ^v ■:, '-i^ ' '■ ' ,^-,:/v ■ ■ V 'iS ^'. ■..-«-:%i- ;•■- «% 3 ' 'iu i^^.l -^>19- ■ g^oi*! 'V ' ', '■' 1 ^,,'.. ; 'f :.(! ., ' . ' ' ** '■•^ * ", 5 ‘ ^ • *‘ ” *' ‘m ^ '> a, ■■ . ..:^^Wi''^/r ‘ ;at , 6 j/: 1^- . td> 'm-V .. .— i.i'TT 25 TABLE IV. The Distribution of Nitrogen in Casein No. 1 Ni trogen No. 2 Nitrogen srams per cent srams per cent Amide .0906 10.26 .0916 10.49 Humin .0173 1.94 .0190 2.13 Arginine .0720 8.15 .0673 7.42 Histidine .0533 6.03 .0537 6.01 Lysine .0637 7.21 .0812 9.09 Cystine .0064 .73 .0043 .48 Mono amino .4225 47.84 .5253 53.78 Non amino .0788 8.92 .0530 5.93 Sum .8046 91.08 .8954 100.33 Total nitrogen by Kjeldahl .8830 100.00 .8935 100.00 The figures given in determinations 1 and 2 renresent in each case duplicate analyses. > i ___ - , , - . , . K' Tv '^‘•: ' v.V;FiKfawv '.•5' . ■' - ' icS' ^f''"'*- T ■^'^ ' '.'V'' ' A '.. .^- IP''' ^ 'W» "j.:.„'.i«2rf5ia itlass. -. (

.>v ' -a' »r'- ’■■ it’ '" ’,t ' ( ■• ' •^ ir -^' '. I ',*V m p. ^J. -— Ji g^'A.0^0.- '■■ . ■ ^i^2^«A^Si||! " ; 'SV,t^^;s . , kMiniA^ t:ch '# ■ "^'- ■ 5'.'' . “■ ■' * ' .4 ■^•''^■■.* ^o^oox. f.ali^&.i i’ 'v - .r>- — t ' 't ■> ' ^ ■' ^ ( j .■ I ' r -'V- Wj '• ' -r . .: . ‘'"■’f# 1'. : 'fj^l -> .-1, -m T ■ 1 itJilfiari III I |M| I g*M Bii^ iiiti‘' ti I I'liii iiiiiir'i « III fall! i I'mi i i ■■' -“- ’ - - . . .. . Lk)iL> .1 r'H ii‘' 'tf ' 26 TABLE V . The Distribution of Nitrogen in Deaminized Casein. 45- No. 1 No. 2 Nitrogen Nitrogen grams ner cent grams ner cent Amide .0921 11.11 .0921 11.09 Hum in .0178 2.14 .0257 2.85 Arginine .0608 7.55 .0588 7.09 Histidine .0554 6.68 .0525 5.39 Lysine -.0054 -.40 .0056 .67 Cystine .0070 .84 .0022 .26 Mono amino .4295 51.78 .5520 66.50 Non amino .0859 10.12 .0486 5.85 Sum .7465 90.02 .8155 98.20 Total nitrogen hy Kjeldahl .8290 100.00 .8500 100.00 45- The figures given in determinations 1 and 2 represent in each case duplicate analyses. '■ »F*>T ■’• r*. 'T{1 •’ vf< r ’"f •1;.*.'^ -■ V-, iwi ■ f I ' ■ , '■ 'V /• ; ^:- ^ ' .J '" ■' M'-l ■)■ ->'^> C' ,' . » ' \ • ,■. \'> . ' •• „ ■:- ■ •;< -^^Sl '!<3BK?;' S ■ »?sSv >-■ Ik ' ’ " ■‘y‘i»V ’^' , vr ,T -■ v>. *t»i >■ K:* *' aO‘X>ar> ^-_ .:.m =1 , -.,.... p ■ * . ' ^ . a ' -. ^ y . ^ ■ ■ > --f . .■ .V :.; ’ .. . I'? • K'W p. ’VJ £.(' ' i' '''Pl ■V',tS-’ ■ '.S'. K. Ki-y^ ' ’ ir- ••••• Mti 3 ni ' '’W^ ■ ' ,■ < v: i'.ii . '•' 'A , : .r . ,9 ' i aV-- ' -.f'_ IVi'^r’^-.r^T ; K- ,■ i.U ■ '■ ; ^ ■ - - F ^ ■ - - •^- I. ■ ' jiirt- iHii' '^v?! ■ ■1..'^ .^^ ^.-rA4^2'SJ f I 27 TABLE VI Deainini zed Amino Casein 1. Casein A-64 Acid 1 2 Ave . 1 O Ave Arginine 3.72 3.44 3.58 3.14 3.03 3.08 Histidine 3.27 3 . 30 3.28 3.40 1.98 2.69 Lysine 5.53 7.05 6.29 -.29 .48 .09 Cystine .85 .57 .71 .93 .28 .60 - I I "*' i\i^^ |iKpi r< i itf i - i ^i-tritf r f». n ,^^.m „ '• ■ <• : ia?:, . ‘ ‘^■' • ■.'(■f^ \ , . v'''''"^v"' ; w' >■ .-i'- • ■* ■ ’ I ..; .■4..'.^,v**' .. nc •*,. «»*#•''• '■^ • : ."lip, . ■ ■r ‘'^-'^r;i i'fi ¥ \ '■'*/*’ ■< iVi irri . ;. A< . -*vSH!3i.olut'9i_i -' ' i.. , . . ,i-'' •■* ■ iisiiiifflK*-' , *■' , -1^' ; l^' _ "■ •. . ~ . . ' ' ',. * . .‘^' ■ * ■ 1 ''}■■ ^ ' ’'it? • ' V .:’ I ■■ *:if.- •■’1 •»! CO. ■ ■ ■ B^'. . ^ "S' ,'■'.{ I • ■"'.1 ' . ^. '■ ■ I ■ '.Btk- ^ I ! I , , 'T : ! ’O. a;?.' y^ Ofl - t™. «W,*. / -LJ • - SB*’ •"'- (inW«iiC ’p'-' -• smrmm F- • ^ :■ «.!' : Ibt'L' .f>V'';& ■■, - ' . .>;iSp|ltJ •-<. M" W >4/ -i.!. . •Ii-Ji . A -V'-i .M.,1 • . ‘ r . ,’•' , ‘!;.£fisifp • ..„*5^;:->Wtl ■'=i.,'v4 fr>V' -I ? j-v-'i^rv', ' '. 1 . •' .'"■■■ •■ i'l.- '■ , -'^< 7 .* V:,V- '• ' 'iSWKtr ' 's*’i^'3 n v^^JT ^•‘. ' './; ■'■ V** ' ■ ■ Pi; . '!iV; i/^'4 ?'■' f f 1 • P*:- :*w -’’..a^S' i^VJ. 'CW !»■.•. '^'...V /■•■f.' 'HU >-•' '., 1 "^' ^ Jvp- 4 |jk| 1 ;-.v'Y 4 L-:i43»3*T(.»"' 28 . and in general the figures obtained for casein and deaminized casein agree closely. Skraup has renorted a diminution in the per cent of arginine and histidine nitrogen in deaminized casein and the entire absence of lysine in the deaminized product. In the present research the average figure for two determinations of arginine nitrogen in deaminized casein v/as found to be 7.21 per cent. Since this value is only .56 per cent lower than the average figure, 7.78 ner cent, for casein it is believed that this difference is within excerimen tal error and does not signify a destruction of this amino acid in the deaminized product. This is what would be exnected if nitrous acid is without action upon the guanidine group of arginine which has been shovm to be free in the protein m.olecule. If, on the other hand, it is true as reported recently by Sekine (49) that the guanidine group of arginine is slowly attacked within the space of a few hours by nitrous acid at low temperatures some destruction of arginine would be expected. In the first determination of the histidine nitrogen of deaminized casein, 6.68 per cent was found, while by the second analysis only 3.89 per cent was obtained. Since the former value agrees approximately with the average figure, 6.02 per cent, found for casein while the latter is only about one-half of that amount, no definite conclusion concerning the fate of histidine in the deaminized product can be drawn. The average figure for lysine in casein was found to be 8.15 per cent wrhile in the deaminized product minus .40 per cent v/as obtained by the first analysis and -- ■ — 29 . 1 I plus .67 per cent "by the second. The average figures for these determinations is plus .13 per cent. It is considered that probably no lysine is present since the amount found is within the limits of accuracy of the method. It would seem, therefore, that this observation is in harmony with the work of Skraup (1), in which no lysine could be isolated from the hydrolyzed products of deaminized proteins and with the cur- rent theory concerning the nature of the free amino groups in the nrotein molecule. According to this theory the epsilon amino groun of lysine is free in the nrotein molecule and it is this group which is attacked when deamini zation occurs. It is further believed by Van Slyke and others that the free amino nitrogen of native proteins is due almost entirely to the epsilon amino group of lysine since the free am.ino nitrogen content of these proteins is approximately one-half of the nitrogen of the lysine which they have been shown to contain. Those who oppose (6 and 7) this theory have found that certain native proteins have a free amino nitrogen content which is not one-half of the nitrogen of the lysine present. However the belief that the free amino nitrogen of native proteins is due at least in part to the epsilon amino group of lysine renders likely the assumption that deaminization of native proteins cleaves the terminal amino group of lysine to form oc amino e hydroxy caproic acid. Since this derivative of lysine would not be basic, its subsequent reactions would be those common to the mono amino acids, i.e., it would not be precipitated by phospho- tungstic acid but would appear in the mono amino filtrate. '••jrics'r^..*^-..* .-v’jc~vV'J' ».;." 7 i , h I. -.r..' - . w I ‘.'T* ^4 \ 't t v' -V, - ,vno- ' f ,i \ ■..■ 'c. ,'. n ' I ■; \' ' ' r ' ,./ ■■'' v' r ' 'i •.. ■ ' . ••’ ■■ ’ . ■ t. •: •' * .V .,ti r ■ '•■ f * ■■•'.■. >*"'■'' I i‘r> ■'•.] yi'c^t t j ■% ■•••■ " i, '• ^ . .iwi'V , ■'t' 'j.r'j • / » .* • -. i ' y a •' V n j. '* ■ '. V. ^ .* ,j; ,0 . f ^ -.'f oe ''rj.o'ibw'’’ .M JM’O' ''uifJ .■."^>*t f : ■ ' - c 0 -TCr >.:xl r. ■ '>: - r \ ' ' 1 .W ' / • , , J . i { ; 1. *. : : ,1 ' ' ' r ' ( . .'n. . '•lirOfV' . ^'■!J i?;. s ■ J c 'x.'i . I ;' -.r-- i',.. .- f . i" 'r -4 -LO^ j < -V f . ^ ^ nowc^ ' ' v.^ . ••■,.; ' '■t ' , ri/:r£^ q- i:V‘v':.r; ■>'.■ o,%4 t/'x ' i*H.i ' .1 j'i ''>. • ■ 1 ■ ' - 4'»‘ n*" -i" ■ ' : '-■■ fi w t ■' 'J*! i 3 if ! Cr i ”>■• 'j. <" ■-', r'C 3 iT."***' /■,■■ * ■'V vcr; *■ rt . . : - . .rr' ■•. ■■ , ' ■’ ' ,v ’■(' f*' 1-C.’ ' ,, - 'r^a 7 -jO*^f: ■.•, ‘qji: ifr » .a jv ; 'f c ; r > ■' 3 .^n '3 .!.’'• •• . •■’•i''7 I' J. :v^X ^ qijox',-- :jt: »i;; • I"- ., -u'l'r: i. ■ n ■ ' ' J -'•/i '“'fj-'' V POf^r rx :'-X:uv.v 3 ;.'/. 3 ' ' loMiiii ; j.* j »r„ 9'X 31/ 30. The marked increase in mono amino nitrogen in the filtrate hy the second analysis indicates that this or some other ly- sine derivative has become associated with the mono amino acid fraction. Attempts made by Skraup and others to isolate this hydroxy derivative of lysine have failed. Skraup (22) claims to have obtained the anhydride of oc amino S hydroxy valerianic acid which he believes has been formed from the hydroxy caproic acid derivative of lysine. In the nresent investigation it seemed likely from di- rect determinations of tyrosine in the original acid hydroly- sates (see Table III) that some of this amino acid had been destroyed in the process of deaminization. To obtain further evidence bearing unon this point analyses of tyrosine in the mono amino acid filtrates of casein and deaminized casein were made. In the case of casein, '5.41 and 5.89 per cent were found while 2.7 2 and 2.98 per cent of tyrosine 7t4fr.;'piUirit Qm>{r Y*! ! s>jJ»gj»*rl»j ‘a*j}“iS,-effC^ w '4 '■ ■ }■''''■ ’• ■ ' -.j ‘ '■'‘'-I,' ^ ' 'f ' :;^‘-r:“tr^ori-^0. '.te *ra (?inj .?.orw- .»-e ?.u dnoo^-. :i . I •, ,'i ■ •'■lY .. -:■ ' ’.■' - ^ , '.-w •' ■•'* . .’ 'Vj' i^.: ^ ■> '* '■ I .j* ' ' »i‘f'^3, ;, • ■ sr.tl ^(f in ! :: ;: • ■• : . . / “4. ,. ^ ' ,.. •• ‘-i:- . ki. ' '■ nii' * . - . ^ 0®*''y*93b^<|, OAito- 6-Xif{'j ?Q ■■' ‘•-'- |^'l''.tiJ , :i '' . ■ . 4; * y <1^ 4*1^;; ' r i O^"',- ^ r • Sv' '*X'0 JT^'30 '(S'*' i>'f(. ,. ■ ; ■' ' ■ ■ '• , . . ‘rftl\it^ , (^i-ei^ii09^yi^.in ^-3 • .. , • _ i '* - » ;.'•/ . •!•' v-r' M ' <<•.■ .•' >v / j^.*'^ ' - ‘-jSbr • ' .■’."®‘',Z''a fv,-e. ..^ih,-:,> ^6 Sc”'. ?«5.. feiXliri^' cmcm y i'«4.' '•iYjfVw'''' ‘m’ ^ '/ -..I'aa. *< ^.S Jt MT-. -*C. .i i 'tirmJlaB’ . Si*t ‘ .' , vr'if^M.yjjlSS l^^.u •. .♦ ,;r ..f-'’-’ ^ li^ikltfeAis . I •... .i. / 'fi. /jk^i 31. — V. Digestion in Vitro. The observations renorted in the literature in regard to the digestibility of deaminized proteins are conflicting. Treves and Saloraone fl8) reported that deaminized proteins were not digested by artificial gastric or pancreatic juices, while Schiff (16) found them to be completely digested by dog's gastric juice although the rate of digestion was much slower than with the original proteins. Levites (26) found digestion to be complete with dog's gastric juice except for a small residue. In a review of the methods used for studying digestion in vitro the statement is made by Prankel (51) that "the best index of the extent to which a protein has been disin- tegrated is the ratio of the amino nitrogen at a given time to the total amino nitrogen obtained after hydrolysis". Of the various methods by which the amino nitrogen of nroteins may be estimated Prankel chose the Van Slyke procedure as "best suited to th^problem in hand." After examining eight methods for the study of proteolytic action, Sherman and Neun (52) concluded that "the quantitative determination of the amino nitrogen of digestion products appears to be more delicate as a means of detecting proteolysis than either the biuret or the ninhydrin reaction and more delicate, ac- curate, and generally applicable as a means for its measure- ment than any of the other quantitative methods here studied." These authors used the Van Slyke method for estimating amino •: . ; Vi - .j i-, ilZ) V,;j 'o£;; “■ ..u n'c.t'f.: m ; 'I* Iv nl c'*' - ‘io ' *■? 'Vo K/: : o.S ' 6 r i.''i o:.’’:n>'- orfj Vo -i.:v ^ -■ .. .f ■ •■' 'V-'’ ■ ^ ‘ • :• ■ - ■ tT’. r.s.' i^'Tor rip. J'-. o Or/fNr{ r . ■ ; ,.-j y 'o i 0 o c i f rr< 7 T? 7 *" • .‘c> 1 0;; J ,=?• £'^ j ff 3 lyo ■ j v n*' , vrJ.yjl/0 :M } . V ■ ^.•^.£Vrf 6 Up ' ;or' Vr ’. - r \t.Te«’ ^ .'t ij, nc bCiVo •j''f ii'f'V- 0 ^':iJj 'V -/i 5 I 32. nitrogen but assumed that results with the S^irenson method would run parallel . In the proteolytic studies of the present investigation, the action o^epsin, trypsin and erepsin alone and in series was studied. The samples of pepsin and trypsin used in these experiments viere commercial preparations known to be active, while erepsin was nrepared from the intestinal mucosa of a dog according to Prankel's (51) modification of the method originally outlined by Rice (53). The erepsin preparation was considered to be trypsin free since it was without action upon fibrin. The samples of casein and deaminized casein were hydrolyzed according to the method of Henriques and Gjaldb8.k (37) but the total amino nitrogen was determined by the nitrous acid method. This figure, A^'/hen corrected for free amino nitrogen, was considered to represent the amino nitrogen in nentide linkage, i.e., the maximum amount of amino nitrogen actually available for liberation by enzymes. The liberation of amino nitrogen during digestion was follow- ed by means of the Van Slyke micro apparatus. Prankel ran controls ”with all reagents and ferments in the same quantity except that no protein was added,” to correct for the amino nitrogen present in the reagents. In the present study con- trol experiments were carried out with the same amounts of protein and reagents but using boiled enzyme solutions. With the latter tecnique corrections are made not only for the amino nitrogen present in the reagents and enzyme added but for the free amino nitrogen content of the proteins and i - -i !. . - ;.. ;i27' B»;\’ Co fJu£re*T: vr'^W;lC 24 * *•; . 33 . for that which may have been liberated by the hydrolytic action of the reagents. It is believed, therefore, that the corrected values for the free amino nitrogen are an accurate measure of the amino groups actually liberated by the digest- ive action of the enzymes employed. The results given in Table VH were obtained by the si- multaneous digestion of 5.0 gram samples of casein 1 and de- aminized casein A-64. These proteins were suspended uniformly in 250 c.c. of .2f^ hydrochloric acid and 20 c.c. of an aqueous solution, containing .2 of a gram of pepsin, added. Controls containing the protein, all reagents and boiled enzyme solu- tion were run. After thoroughly mixing the contents of each flask 5 c.c. of toluene were added as a preservative and in- cubation at 38° C. begun. At the end of 3 hours incubation the casein sample had gone entirely into solution, but the deaminized casein and the controls had settled out. The supernatant liquid of the controls was colorless but that of the deaminized casein sample ?;as colored yellow, indicating that a partial digestion had taken place in the latter case. At the expiration of the 3 hour period, uniform samples from each flask were taken for analysis of amino nitrogen in the Van Slyke micro apparatus. To 5 c.c. portions from each flask was added .5 c.c. of N sodium hydroxide to stop the digestion. The resulting solution was diluted to 10 c.c. in a volumetric flask and 2 c.c. taljen for analysis. At stated intervals in the digestion of these proteins subsequent amino nitrogen determinations were made. At the end of 110 hours • 7 T♦*^4V,_ '•■. ■ V-v.V.3C^^. ■.'.^. • '.’^V'' W-' •• 'iv • • w- '/ n«:.^^r^.' sii'V!^' ’”«4> |A ' ' '* *' ' <* J _ , ■ j, . '^■^''',tY,-f *'■ j^.'’'‘4*> '" H' • < ’ ' ■ ■ ‘'■>*wi> . L K'o V, X (fCi; r 1^ v A'-ilij, . ':r, " ' «. 1 1 ^ I- ’ V i^j! s; k >v- •'•1.-' ■ ' ... •,.' . ^ _ 'i,. ■ ' . '' f4 ■ ' - i. ■ ‘ ^»|- ,;*■ S' ,^^‘V »v< V , ,\ rf, ■ » r f - ■ A. . '*-»i' * V tf ''’*■ 'S •V ! '-rv: ^ ^ '«i. r ■ ". v.^-" -r— i ,j ^ , - . ; V’TTTffl? ^ w T’ "S'- ,,-'''’W'r . »?»*.!''#. . ■ »■ T Akiii-\ .- >1.^:. ^ L _i'. i. ^«; -i ' o -I ^-Tifi . 'i . r .'iji- ' ■* i»‘ .£Ti l » , y= I' '-'j «*•«.’ ‘^,r*o b'i.fKr^_ io^}vUii Wt ^ ,^1 t |T ■*': *. .LTC ■ : ; ^ _ * M • '■ 5 ’ . * JD ^ ^ J i .:.iv4i /.' » <•■ '».ii.^* n. • ‘ " ' ^‘ ' * • ^ ' t,Ji^ * > ^ 1 ;/ ’ iJTi ii.- V, ,'■ \iS ii.S. .... ... _.. 37 . After incubating at 38° C. for 22.5 hours a 5 c.c. sample from each flask was taken, .5 c.c. of glacial acetic acid to arrest digestion and the resulting mixture diluted to 10 c.c. in a volumetric flask.* A clear but brown liquid in the case of casein A-64 indicated some digestion had taken place in each instance. The appearance of the proteins in the con- trol flasks was not altered. The results obtained from the enzymatic hydrolyses of casein agreed closely with the observations of Frankel (51). Pepsin liberated 11 per cent of the total amino nitrogen of casein in 87 hours: trynsin superimposed upon the pepsin di- gest set free 79 per cent in 60 hours, and by the further action of erepsin 95 per cent of the total amino nitrogen was liberated in 66 hours. These values are maximum for these enzymes since the amino nitrogen was found to remain constant over a period of 25 or more hours of additional digestion. Frankel believes this to be due to the auto destruction of the ferment rather than to the inhibiting action of the end products as suggested bjr Abderhalden and Gigon (54). The digestion of deaminized casein proceeded in every case at a slower rate than that of casein and the total cleavage was considerably less. Only 3 per cent of the total amino nitro- gen of deaminized casein was liberated after 110 hours of peptic digestion in contrast to 11 per cent with casein. Tryptic digestion for 132 hours set free only 33 per cent of the total amino nitrogen as compared with 73 per cent for casein, while the further action of erepsin liberated only U.‘ ' ■' • : I. itV ,• » • f n V ' I o ' tiO.- J. , f _ *v ^ , ; r .t r;-r' !,. ■.«.'< ■ • 1 .i f* f-*- ■- o ‘„r , >■ *' . s ’’ •» ' 1 . . - U ’' '■) ■ J»'o:i ‘ t i T‘ * >.3^ . , 'V : V '8. ! -fr i V '' : ’c''": , r:v? 'Iv ir v; ■' • "I' ' .' ; w ,or - * > ' u * f J. ■r-' ■I ‘.Ti .; r< s': J.'.Tj'.;' •t I- 't.-.'u 1^. y.’ i r • ) • / fc ■ / ■•. : v.-i?' ■■ r .-f '\ ^ • • • ■ , i j'J .“l; #•« f • » , y ' ' ’ ' \ 0 ■■,. JLC i ■ ' ■ ' . i*\ ■ [’■ j Bf? . • ■•LfO'f ’ V rl ■:?r'^J>r-or n ', ■ !<■' ' V ' ■ - f' 1 ''9fK ^V. /■ ' ' • ■ ■ .' r.r -* ,: 't-'K'” * > . ’ , '■ ‘ i 1 !■ A .N \ 4 ^ i ^ ^ ■ ' "C ■r: J ^.u.. r o , '1 cd ' " \ , • \; . '- <, r- '.■ ,i '■- i/n - '■'I'' ’1 , f ■>■'1 rv;,. j .!• ■ 1 ' r i- . _■ - ::v:i.r r. . ■: fl XO’j.r. I 'rfi' • T »% . fJ'':' % ►' n^'’;5 04i' ■' ' : ‘T r i i r* . . ; .... I ^ • -W; ■■■ i,,;; •..• t-f. 'is^ :'i 65 per cent of the total value for amino nitrogen as con- trasted with 95 per cent for casein. It is possible that this difference in digestive action hetv/een casein and deaminized casein may be due to the less- ened solubility of the latter and its consequent less in- timate contact with the enzymes. There is also the possibility that reactions incidental to the process of deaminization may have taken nlace to alter the peptide linkage in such a way that its cleavage by enzymes became more difficult. It is evident from the results reoorted in Table VIII that trypsin will digest deaminized casein without the pre- liminary action of pepsin. However, the rate of digestion with trypsin is slower than that with the preliminary action of pepsin and with trypsin alone a lessened cleavage is pro- duced. The digestion of deaminized casein with trypsin is less extensive and proceeds at a slower rate than that of casein . Since it is known that casein is attacked by erepsin without the preliminary action of other enzymes it was of in- terest to test the action of this enzyme towards deaminized casein. It was found (see Table ’ IX.) that 11 per cent of the total amino nitrogen of casein was liberated after 93 hours of ereptic digestion but no amino nitrogen was obtained from de- aminized casein. It would appear, therefore, that erepsin does not attack deaminized casein directly or at least it does so very slowly. ;, .. •;', -r^?3 •.'.. ■y:,^.-i:)isi.. .-/-Jito %.l’- ofti/jy' .Mtey mxvis ' ■< s. . ' ■ 'I’v?*' ■-': . --v\ -i ',*p ‘ ‘ . *j. ’- |«^, - • ■ ^': : .‘.; ; *♦•; L,., ■ ^ '■'v *') :. *:’ 'r :.'i' >..*»»,’ . ' '^ ’ '’/v. j* (‘f '*' ' * ' \ ' * ' ' ' ~'^" " ' "' '' \s: . Jo ( ^^”5 -j^iX^^'Vtft^'is.)' V^Sv. ■■ . AiTt&.V‘, to ' ■ * ■ — -.jr , , , . HIA Bfei ‘%i.‘ • ;. . j*:' .r'r. ■ viiM '■;-*5|^^i^fe.... __. .. ... ' " 'P •'-' »J( ^ |iS»^ Ti r u‘ r (MiiTYiitffiii|-iina y j r » 1 1 ii'. y p r iit yj ii j i l i mimn aiin y i 39 TABLE VIII. The TryDtic Digestion of Casein 1. and Deaminized Casein A-64. The Percent of Total Amino Nitrogen Liberated Hours Casein 1. Casein A.-64 o # o 0.0 0.0 22.5 41.3 25.3 45.0 50.4 27.9 68.5 52.7 27.3 92.5 52.4 28 .7 TABLE IX. The Ereptic Digestion of and Deaminized Casein Casein 1. A-64. Hours The Percent of Total Amino Nitrogen Liberated Casein 1. Casein A-64 o • o o • o 0.0 21.5 00 • o o • o 45.5 00 • o 0.0 93.5 11.6 o . o II >i<|f|M>i i»iii'tt i » i, .5i . 'X.. .wi*.,. I j ^ *ii ' * ' I' ■ • : t ^ ^ i 'i_ „. /''’/'•■ h-' V S *V' , •'».'/ ■ ,, , '^>-s5' V ■’ .''t’ -jS" ■ '' ‘ r. 7'" /'V '.-'■« ■ •3^^ ' ** '' *■-' • j2^'! ” ' Ty. V ^ V rfftkp: :! •'< i ^ ■ , ■ kA|i4y| • ;’.>vi •■• ‘i ■’ • ajJL’ '.v^ i^: - \>-5'' I ''■ ® y , I #' -t r -Iil^v'^' r r;" -is J".?? . . % ■ ’ WjSJ i *v;»- r ■'O' ^'• i - |f\, ' '* *>’ !■ fe ^ ' 4u • '' . jil. ■'■'*- 't) • 1 ' ,. .■ ■ ‘ i > , ^•■'' ■ .'6>0 ' '■'‘- .''^ r. -y^ .1 V * . ^ • * \f9‘ • 'i"'' ’■'• ?v;' >_ a{ T ■ •. - 4 . . .4r:; '■ '■•i ' 'V . . V >' '• •■'?r^'VV--.'fe‘. ‘ '■2*nR'...J Ly■.^ : .. ' v«V } 1^ '’• ■‘- iK • •} ,; ':■ I’v • a y, ^ ;.V;". a'a'x ‘ilSA '‘'ar^ ®p 'V , •■ v-: ’;r V‘' B .rV'K . ..'i. v.^u B., I'b I • \: 40 . Bn F. The Behavior of Deaminized Casein in the Animal 0rg;anism . Since in the nresent investigation digestion experiments in vitro indicated that deaminized casein was digested al- though at a slower rate than casein it was desirable to study the behavior of deaminized casein in the animal organism. A female dog, weighing about 9 kilos was maintained upon a uni- form diet for 10 days to permit a constant level of nitrogen excretion to be reached. At the expiration of this period 10 grams of deaminized casein A-64 was added to the standard diet and the elimination of extra nitrogen in the urine de- termined. The standard diet as given in Table X was considered to be calorifically adequate for a dog of the size used. The beef heart, chosen in preference to other kinds of meat because of its uniform composition, was dissected free from fat, valves and tendons and ground to a pulp in a grinder. The mass was kneaded to a uniform consistency and preserved in glass jars at a low temperature. Since in feeding experi- ments requiring the use of a synthetic diet it is important to render the food as palatable as possible, the standard diet used in the present research was prepared as follows: Substance Table X. Amount (fi-ms) Calories Bone ash 10 Sucrose 35 140 Starch 25 100 Beef heart 50 120 Fat (lard) 25 225 Water 400 c . c . — Sum 585 f t 1 OJ . .1 V '■ •■ji’ ' *r’.' s I ■ \ ■\' ■ " .,■>.■ • • - ','1 r w. ' . C iv> i ^ rn^^lv 'ni - ;^V ’'' ■■.■; ■ ; '■:«»•.•.: J: u\rc ri^uoffi ' *■ Z' "■ ■ •' '■ • • ^ .^'*' -' ■' r<'^ (. ■■ H • i 41 Date Weight of Dos TABLE XI. Total (1) Total Sulnhur Nitrosen Urea and Ammonia N. % of total N as urea N. kg. gms . gms . gms . Jan. 7 — — " 8 — — — — — " 9 — — — -- — ” 10 9.90 — — — — " 11 9.90 1.355 .841 62 " 12 9.88 .068 1.342 .910 67 " 13 9.88 .069 1.251 .757 60 ft 14 9.86 .070 1.427 .872 61 9.82 .077 1.955 1.622 77 " 16 9.75 .064 1.363 .946 69 ” 17 9.75 .082 1.246 .960 77 " 18 9.75 .073 1.299 .968 74 " 19 9.73 •35- 10 grams of deaminized casein A-64 were fed in addition to the standard diet. (l). Thanks are due Miss Lucie E. Root for the sulphur de- terminations reported in Table XI. ’fMT.v ■■ , y ■' y 'Wiry s i; :■ !>■ ■.(.,; •O'- v*>;-t, ‘’;if va '■'. -vsi , v -i-.i':/ ■ JJ k 'i-'si..' > , '■ iijj.1 4' ulia I , S ■, . \ »lL'AI**.’.' 1 > -I^ifffastl,. ■ 4'u5iS3,tiit, • gi iS. . ft 5ii*s ■“' » ' '•’ i»l ■•, . 1 ••'} I ^*s»BUi. '/,■' '„X‘ ■ ., ■" ,v:t 4'\- -,' 'ivT.>-'."- tL' ■y '- ~“v '■' ■ ■•' V ".f^^ L-- P- <*I 'T '• blj ': w.’ Tj* • ^ .\! ‘ " •'1'' .1 ' .„•/ ‘ ■lS ; n&:.0 1 *• ^ « . ’ ■ ■ \- !• *" .'■“. i-^d'v: .. ,1 '■ ■"• l' ( f , , ... :-%; ^ ■ ■'''• OS'. . t' ',i,«ir ■ ^ ‘C ", s-(5.P* ^ J *f' 1 *.' . w #*l tl «k'M ■ ( j ■ '0 ■|) ’^,‘ •'<' '.^' '■’ ' oe.e ■ ox ” .' j,; - -ss-i. f^i-r iy. -'ii i A- • X‘- , \ * * . 1 ‘ • r. • ‘ . ■ fi •» r . '» : . .# " '. .. ' ■■ ' • r ; -t •«tTV^' V«; -r.''W ■«.. ( ■■ ' <' 'i'fer'T'. ' •‘JtOCo r ,iw ' ■-. . - -' I aK/'*'. ' ' -u- ‘ . V-. * ■"♦ 'i. > ' ' ' „•'“' , '• . ft .1 ,1 ' w .*.'<•■.■ I-! ■ ■ :' ■ '. I ■ t_ ,^. '. .' ;.' • • ' ''5d ■ , '.' ^ f'.S “t HBtf>'v', - A-' ■' '"W' ■ '^f ■* 3^:^' JJ i. if . „ , ■ 47 . , ‘ Im/,5iM‘.,V .) , i.'V' ' iMjaJra ) ^ “ i';- V- , - ''■■ 1 . .' r' «' ' 'i- y" • ,«v ■ i J '<,4*f5lilM f I *, 0 ‘M/’ .'5 t'' ■> Si''.' /■• ■#. ., , *./iv v.i.'i '•■ ■ •' .. if'" I •' V • • -.*|. ’.<•; . );-*r ■"’i , ■ iiftn 'v’>u ■ r-"- •' 1 - IM Iii1r>ini0««i*4ai11it. .lalfci I '^'iLr I.. I “ . .1 42 . 10 grams of bone ash and 35 grams of sucrose were added to 350 c.c. of distilled water and the mixture heated to boiling. To this mixture was added 25 grams of starch made into a paste with 50 c.c. of distilled v/ater with constant stirring to prevent burning of the starch. In a few minutes the mix- ture thickened because of the swelling of the starch granules. While the vessel containing this mixture was cooling, 50 grams of beef heart and 25 grams of lard were added and stirring continued until a uniform mixture was obtained. As a routine procedure this diet was fed immediately after catheteriza- tion of the dog at 9:00 A.M. According to the figures given in Table XI, the total nitrogen elimination for the experimental day after feeding 10 grams of deaminized casein represented 43 per cent of the nitrogen added to the standard diet as deaminized casein. This amount was .615 grams in excess of the average nitrogen elimination for the fore and after periods. Since there was a corresnonding or even greater increase in urea nitrogen the assumntion that utilization of the deaminized casein in the animal organism has occurred seems well founded. j Since the preliminary experiments seemed to indicate ! i utilization of deaminized casein in the animal organism it i was desirable to determine whether an animal could be main- tained in nitrogenous equilibrium upon deaminized casein. The dog used in the preliminary experiment was put upon a standard diet the nitrogen content of which was determined | by Kjeldahl analysis. This diet given in Table XII ^as f 4 V ’ -wnr^'i r..i iiipiii BX i'''- ” ^1. ^ a ^ v;/- . , fcv . ‘'^T^ L' . ‘ , *■ V . • ’ rtf. jA »r ' L* - >?/■ ,, ' ' ' I < 4'^.' ' . V ■ i ■ ' vl'' -’ ■ ■■‘!-'¥.'"'^ *■ ■''** ' ■ '• ■’ ■ ' •%:*' f.;^ ■ ■ JM.V.ia-.' *' i.-.iL f >._. . ,?t* -,,nt' . Vi ■' fAif 43 . comparable to that used in the foregoing exoeriment although it was made higher in calorific value because the animal had lost weight in the first experiment. TABLE XII Substance Amount Calories Ni trogen gms . gms . Water 400 c.c. — — Bone Ash 10 — .0002 Cane sugar 40 160 .0160 Beef heart 25 60 .7400 Com starch 25 100 .0180 Lard 35 305 .0035 Casein II 25 or 100 3.3900 Casein A-64 24.19 Sum 725 4.1677 After 8 days on the standard diet, using the routine procedure of the preliminary experiment, deaminized casein was substituted for casein. Ordinarily the food was eagerly and completely devoured but on the second day with deaminized casein the dog ate with reluctance and after 2 or 3 hours time the food which had been eaten was vomited up. This obser- vation seems to indicate that deaminized casein becomes toxic to the animal organism. The deaminized casein fed on the first day was apparently not toxic or at least not 44 . sufficiently so to prevent its absorption and the elimination of its nitrogen in the urine. No explanation for the ab- normally high elimination of nitrogen on this experimental day has been found. The original intention was to continue the experiment with deaminized casein for a longer time but the toxicity of this product rendered further experimentation inadvisable, if not im.possible. It would seem, however, from this isolat- ed experiment that deaminized casein cannot replace casein in the diet because of its toxicity but whether the deaminized product will maintain an animal in nitrogenous equilibrium is still to be determined. • •- ' y '<■ 1 ■;.> ® V- ®T*W p i^- ^ '' ’ .ff ^ *:;■■ -f T-VS ’ .ct . ' ■ - '•■ ■' I - ' '. ^. £ •’•'jT *1 .. • ito AJ '" , «T ^ JriiacJ '^'- Lll '-yi '•j "’’fv-r' f yy ' ■'. ^ ■ A' ^.AS^ M I i- r . □ I*' rt' ■^- J ■ • " I J V,.*J -A ■’ r . 'V, * '5,'j4^-; &’liSj ■/•■«< •ihiC'.v w.’ 'i\' ' I'i Jw'' . A" ^ 45 TABLE XIII Date Weight of Dog Nitrogen of food Nitrogen in kg. gms. gras . Jan. 24 9.75 4.4177 M 25 9.71 4.1677 — tf 26 9.73 If 2.005 »f 27 9.77 It 2.240 If 28 9.86 ff 2.490 If 29 9.84 If 2.640 ff 30 9.86 If 2.660 ff 31 9.88 It 2.939 Feb . 1 9.88 It 3.868 If 2 9.86 ff ■}{■ Deaminized casein A-68 was substituted for casein in the diet. ■V'''*^t,f''My’.^i*?w»^swF^ % ^.•'7-.7P. fi m i ' I • '''„''> ,H: "V* ^v:‘S^ 5 Vr:K'V ’'® );■ ■■' , ' .. -- V , ' . f ' jc^^-(.r _ Ja’ >. ■' -ife.:/ ' r'.'rt'i Si ^ > I ■• 1 - " -KMt? -T HI' I'vt'.rsp;' ■'* -■■ ■ '. / „ ^ ■“'■ f ^'Y i ' . ■■v>..i« ™ )> ;: vrwi Saiil yi :’*Jp , ho ^*. i p: . ‘ “^-'V-:- 'V 'i" ■ 4 '. ■'.•!/ .»■ ^it.- 'f V- '""'Vft. ' -■‘‘ Sf^- ■ ■ ■ ^ •-•■- ■ -M- . -. ■ «l /■ I Vf S' "f. ■ • 9 ” ■■ ■ :■ . .'’ ''fc'tv , " ■ - li^ia rtSiSMW^ s.:- '■, ■!<’»* \....~ ...'•# 1 ^ aM A' 's " ,, ■ ■. , ^ V: ■ v^'-'»'.' 'r : ‘V^PHfJ sn*Pi niflHp ^ ^ -f i, " ’ ■ • '.V ■ r" ' I'J'- ' ' f ■' ' f ^ “■ .P: ... .' .. . i? . ' „ S.p^-Va ^ js;i . ' !., . .1 1 ' •a ‘'M':4! & .... . in ^ mSI 46 . SUMMARY . 1. The free amino nitrogen of a number of sam.ples of casein, prepared in various ways, has been determined and found to be constant. 2. Deaminized casein has been orepared by the action of nitrous acid unon casein. 3. The distribution of nitrogen in casein and deaminized casein has been determined by the Van Slyke partition method. In harmony with the current theory, as to the nature of the free amino groups of. the protein molecule, deaminized casein was found to contain no lysine. No other notable differences between casein and deaminized casein were found. A. 4. Tyrosine was found to be partially destroyed by the deaminization of casein but not completely so as maintained by Skraup. 5. Casein and deaminized casein were found to be di- gested in Vitro by nensin and trypsin. Erepsin was found to digest casein readily but to attack deaminized casein only after the preliminary action of pepsin or trypsin. In every case the digestion of deaminized casein proceeded at a slower rate than the digestion o:^casein. The nitrogen of deaminized casein, administered per os, was excreted as urea. Deaminized casein, administered per os, appeared to be somewhat toxic to the organism. I"' I ’ .m ^^ ' “ >., , ■ p' t '; ,.; ^ ■■ '. •^■'^ ■ ' ■ ’*• 7< . ,i 1 ' *1 ’•V' v^’’ < ■ ' \ . 'j ■. ■': ^*v ■• i\A :■ ,mv«(js :. ^ 4 ,-'t' ' , : vT'^j o' >-‘’(.i.i«i'ma,T “vp: jiscncar p tfuvr&Ui o.-iii(ii' ao-t'f/ejW- v ’’ JT? ' , " - ■ S f; ’ ' - ’*' ■ '^, ,^\ '• tSJB 6 iV ^ •. PS'Vj^yJ' * ■' / " ■ ’' ' " "^y -‘H ^ jp. ,• ;/i';\ 'i ■ '•(■/.* ./ ■, >Kj^< ^ ii 'K- •<. i** .•• i •■ ^ '■ ■ ‘i \ - , »■ r^'-ar ’.■>"?''•***'. ^ ^ . TA»^ ■'' ^ If ■\'.\ ‘ . ,- ■.* •■ ■, ■ •-■ -;SS ' ’> r ' 1 J».. • . '*■" V ■ . f :N:?' ^ rv'r^' ■ ,;.\V\>-h.\' b’-T)' i*fl 4 ‘ ' t* :? ■'. i hH'^gny>rfir, .^p' i;qi:/.^.<>?T':^^ ^.’ 0“ 1 ;• ' , ■■‘'•'.''■r ; - ‘‘-' : ,, . , ,r., 'i '«-•<■•!•■''■ '^>y: ^ -'^' ' ' 'i^ I ' . .1 * ■ '* *' > ^■; viitt & - ^;jr ;.ft f ‘ .^.. r flJHtei*' lar j ■ ^ " p. ' ' -, jIa *1 ' .. ’ ■. 7*^ * »« IMMlf IT iS’ i ■pv ..Jjrjijpp' -^Tr i'/^q6*ii?r . vii$cof v»cf iP frpil:C«; '*'. 'f A ■ ' ' ■^ . I r ■*.. ‘ ' "'''’i ‘"^-rv ' .. »1PQ J^^i'^‘{^^IQ artJ 0±/ C’lSdOd^' ■liJfflff'/ittAR ftprf.. (V.?’- ^A^.iwrrrtfe . »A < V* I 47 . BIBLIOGRAPHY. 1. Skraup, Zd. H., and Hoernes, Ph., Monatsh. Chem., 1906, XXVII, 651. 2. Kossel, A.., and Cameron, A. T., Z. physiol. Chem., 1912. LXXVI, 457. 3. Van Slyke, D. D., and Birchard, P. J., J. Biol. Chem., 1914, XVI, 539. 4. Hartley, P., Biochem. J., 1914, VIII, 541; ibid , 1915, IX, 269. 5. Kossel, A., and Gav/rilow, N., Z. physiol. Chem., 1912, LXXXI, 274. 6. Edlhacher, S., Z. Physiol. Chem., 1919, CVII, 52; ibid 1919, CVIII, 287 and ibid 1920, CX, 153. 7. Felix, K., Z. physiol. Chem., 1920, CX, 217. 8. Herzig, J., Z. physiol. Chem., 1920, CXI, 223. 9. Robertson, T. B., The Physical Chemistry of the Proteins, New York, 1920, p. 23. 10. Bracewell, R. S., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1919, XLI , 1511. 11. Hoppe, P., Virchows Archiv. path. Anat., 1859, XLV, 417. 12. Hammarsten, 0., Nova Acta Regiae Scientiarum Upsaliensis in Memoruara Quattuor Saeculorum ab Universitate Uosaliensi Peractorum. Volumen Extra Ordinem Editum. Upsaliae MDCCCLXXVII. abstracted in Jahresb. Thierchem., 1877, VII, 158. 13. Osborne, T. B., and Guest, H.H., J. Biol. Chem., 1911, IX, 333. Van Slyke, L. L., and Bosworth, A. W. , J. Biol. Chem., 1913, XIV, 203. 14. Loew, 0., J. prakt. Chem., 1885, XXXI, 129. 15. Paal , C., Ber. chem. Ges., 1896, XXIX, 1084. 16. Schiff, H., Ber. chem. Ges., 1896, XXIX, 1354. 48 17. SchrStter, H., Monatsh. Chera., 1898, XIX, 211. 18. Treves, Z., and Salomone, G., Biochem. Z., 1903, VII, 11. 19. Blasel, L., and Matula, J., Biochem. Z., 1914, LVIII, 417. 20. Skraup, Zd.y., Biochem. Z., 1908, X, 245. 21. Skraup, Zd. H., Monatsh. Chem., 1906, XXVII, 653; ibid 1907, XXVIII, 447. 22. Skraup, Zd. H., and Kaas, K., Ann. Chem., 1907, CCCLI , 379. 23. Lampel, H., Monatsh. Chem., 1907, XXVIII, 625. 24. Traxl, W. , Monatsh. Chem., 1908, XXIX, 59. 26. Levites, S.J., Z. physiol. Chem., 1904, XLIII, 202. 26. Levites, S. J., Biochem. Z., 1909, XX, 224. 27. Sidgwick, N. V., The Organic Chemistry of Nitrogen, Oxford, 1910, p. 335. 28. Marvel, C. S., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1920, XLII, 2259. 29. Dakin, H. D., J. Biol. Chem., 1920, XLIV, 499. 30. Sachsse, R., and Kormann, W., Landw. Versuchsstat . , 1874, XVII, 38 and 321. 31. Brown, H. T., and Millar, J. H., Trans. Guinness Re- search Laboratory abstracted in Plimmer, R.H.A., The Chemical Constitution of The Proteins, London, 1917, 3d edition, pt. 1, p. 89. 32. Van Slyke, D. D. , Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol, and Med., 1909, VII, 46 and 176; Ber. chem. Ges., 1910, XLIII, 3170; J. Biol. Chem., 1914, XVI, 121; ibid, 1915, XXIII, 407. • to to Van Slyke, D.D., J. Biol . Chem. , 1912, XII, 275. 34. Van Slyke, D.D., J. Biol . Chem. , 1914, XVI , 539. 35. Mitchell, H.H., and Eckstein, H. C., J . Biol . Chem., 1918, XXXIII, 373. 36. Van Slyke, L.L., and Baker, J. C., J. Biol. Chem., 1913, XXXV, 127. 37. Henri ques, V., and GjaldbB,k, J.K., Z. physiol. Chem., 1910, LXVII, 8. 49 38. Van Slyke, D.D., Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol, and Med., 1909, VII, 176: J.Biol. Chem., 1912, XII, 295. Osborne, T.B., and Guest, H.I.L., J. Biol. Chora., 1911, IX, 333. 39. Mftrner, K.A.H., Z. nhysiol. Chera., 1901, XXXIV, 207. Van Slyke, D.D., J. Biol. Chera., 1911, X, 15. 40. Abderhalden, E., and Langsten, L., Z. nhysiol. Chera., 1910, LXVI, 8. 41. Folin, 0., and MacCallura, A. 3., J. Biol. Chera., 1912, XI, 265. Folin, 0., and Denis, W. , ibid, 1912, XII, 239 and 245; ibid, 1913, XIV, 457. 42. Abderhalden, E., and Fuchs, D., Z. physiol. Chera., 1913, LXXXIII, 468. Abderhalden, E., Z. nhysiol . Chera., 1913, LXXXV, 91; J. Biol. Chera., 1913, XV, 357. 43. Johns, C. 0., and Jones, D. B., J. Biol. Chera., 1918, XXXVI, 319. 44. Gortner, R.A. , and Holm, G.E., J. Am. Chera. Soc., 1920, XLII, 1678. 45. Hausraann, W. , Z. physiol. Chera., 1899, XXVII, 95; ibid, 1900, XXIX, 136. 46. Pliraraer, R.H.A., The Chemical Constitution of the Proteins, London, 1917, 3d edition, pt. 1, p. 87. 47. Kossel, A., and Kutscher, F. ,Z .physiol .Chera. , 1900, XXXI, 165. 48. Van Slyke, D.D., Ber. chem. Ges., 1910, XLIII, 3170; J. Biol. Chera., 1911, X, 15; ibid, 1913, XVI, 531; ibid, 1915, XXII, 281; ibid, 1915, XXIII, 411. 49. Sekine, H., Nogakukaiho, Tokio, 1919, I, 197. abstracted in C.A., 1921, XV, 243. 50. Van Slyke, D.D., Eer. chem. Ges., 1910, XLIII, 3170; J. Biol. Chem., 1913, XVI, 531. Crowther, C., and Raistrick, H., Biochera. J., 1916, X,434 Hart, E. 3., and Sure, B., J .Biol . Chera. , 1916 , XXVIII, 241. " F-' :.-t' \-.r •!* J i» • ■I' ‘ .rrr-f- . ''t- 'i ' '■ ^ r I , ,*V • V i: Xn’ ; \ I?.' \ • ’ f j ■ L' - > £' 7 / r ■ i I i t- I ^ t < I . ,1 , ’* ' t * • . . • , . vj . 1 , --'i'S i ..•> '* •■ :<.V * ,;i .nilc/f ■■ . c ■' ' ' , ' . < - - • - ■ ' f 'X b- . . '■ , * ■ tin X f * • ■ ■ ■ ^ -L, V ’ . . . .• . r,, r-y-l ' - '■ , , m ' <'<-• ! . .'X»V.-’uX'^ ' r • ' . .. . * • • . » . ■ !' ^ , ■ *• • , 1 * . ,'. ; I'j ^ ' I , . •• ••."v . .< 1 ( <■» ^ ‘ • i- ' . Ja . . . ;rfpi. i ‘ ^nT? ' • • V . '“Kt'- , “ r* r , . '1 . ■ , 1: ■ J'-£Ot ’ ' - ' '?l . ; C\ . .-w, rl - K* .. r ^ , r / :“<■*' ' • • . . . . ■ Trc'x , : •*'\/\ ^ ^ . ; -jiV: .. : ,/ : ; v;’"' ,-r^>r'r 7,.;* b * . * ■ ' -t ■ f: . . • '■ A fX'r t -yn y y'l , . ' ■ • ' - e -. , t , , . . . r ' / 1 t ‘ # re r ^ : :'.i . 1 ^'1 . . '■ t- ' l^-'. . ■'» X jyo] j ;• , ' Tif y ' ' • .w ■ ti s *■■■ ■■■ i . .Ci-'cT , IV<:; -''j,J5y :,y^07v ' . . , o O t*C . .■-•■• .... r • , ■ r ' * It/ •-< - r ' V.* y • ' ., f ♦ , i' i: ."in , , .-dbi ....:.rK . ;.;C ■ . , - , • .>o: V* •■ . , '■'v ~'j •, ClD . .. 4 '. . ■ 7. O' C' • ^* t • ‘ ' >f',' L^T; , . . ' . ;' '£>?;V ' TV-* . - ‘ ^■i • mm . 1 i. • r* I' t- ‘ l^i 50 j 51. Prankel, E.M., J. Biol. Chem., 1916, XXVI, 31. 52 . Sherman, H. C., and Neun, D.E., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1916, XXXVIII, 2199. 53. Rice, P.E., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1915, XXXVII, 1319. 54. Ahderhalden, E., and Gigon, A., Z. physiol. Chem., 1907, LIII, 251. 1 J i?* h.:,;0W!i v:o 2 sj ■< ‘H’fX; , ■ - CoXltvH' .’■•■^*''X' 0 <' 3 / V.* 43 ^^ '■' lil*> '■ . Ji. i* D , . i-f* 5 : ''^‘' ^' ' V'' ^*1 ^ ,1^ yi .«. A ’, ■ViM w „ • ii ■ '" ■'?J- • V f rv ^Lf I *• i^^■. * mi, ^ * 'i ’ ■ >, •i> ‘ - , t fo, ‘■'■\ „ .,, .. . 3 'i? If t-i . j' JJV- X ^ * 'i* fc.'^ ; 'ii' '1»V t»r * I tf '■ “* » ^ ■' i- 'j^ ' " ■*■*■; ■ ■ .r .. .-. • I, hif‘ -r y.\_ {..X- <, JplF'^Jk F, ./t : *' - ■ .» 2 i ■- ■ ■ ‘ '■’ ^ • ‘ -V • .. ,T "jC^-‘ ’■i/(y i>C. 4 i' .V # 1 » 't- ^ f '■'■'■ '’'l9';. i'fev -f2j . -' - <*• *1 ' ’ J* i, * '• ^JfVW^ 'ti .'vvt r-f '■ ' 9 • Xp’ u0l?1L>J j'v ■ / &vi9 ' J;''»ki^si:^'i:::: ■< ,^-»4S»F v( .'fj t '"' 'Vviir • ' 'A -Ti‘ •.w W**:vA 4 tf .. I TTiyr' ' . Xi^; . f C< * ■ " ■' F' ' ■' i^«.,'i .’-- V' »r»^.' 1 iir > -• .'XM ‘o I tj **‘- ■»jW.i^ii 'I MW, » I r, 'fW^Lm ^yilt'ii’l "L^-Sl i// ’ V/f>>« It ACKN0\7LEDGMENT I wish to acknowledge my indebt- edness to Dr. H. B. Lewis, at whose suggestion this research was undertaken, for his interest and helpful advice. !i-j(.'* um^wxx' L P _._... „ 3>. « > ‘■f "■ ' ' v^'; ' * "& '0' • •'. 'i , 1 ' . * X •' ‘ ■■ ^ w S (■ ■ ^ l- - fev'Si' ■. .T V ■' ■ i>:-^ i • ^ „ ‘'- A'. V. .v”^ — t, <-•; W V, ^.'' ^ V\j ;i,- ; V • 3 . - >■- . ' X' ■ 1 ' " 9 ■ »5* v’^’., .., •’? Y/n [thi-t: ■ b)J. flfctW -1 V> > «.-, '•«•; ' 3 m VjS’> *Ji B^r^i "~ rfr/vi r 1, ‘Jarkrf -fcrre -cf JSortaJTri .v.. i'i!^\‘:- 'I 2 ?i 'cf3'50»X£sJfri f}^T> -iv'i ..i’Y (iWL -vvJ •■ S>:-! 'V' *' , • '■ r.? -Vr- ''',■- '■ " ■ •;■ '"-V - 'T ' V-?4 • ‘ s, < .. , .A -Ifc '##'• «' ■" ■ > ...91 _ . ■ ■'<»'■ ■' • T -V. 'it . ''= * i . .-.y^ ■'.' • J2 VK. • <■ I-- A"; : y^^’' 'T “a. 4 ? f £"i5 'i A . J(i . A' '■, , '■• 1 ' •■ . , , Ah . • -V L ,'5 jj • ?% - • . ■ ' V. ' JrH'V,. fc, ™ ‘:v -^ffli ,rVf 2 ;vA"'^ ""'.X <1 i/Ni- t '■> ■t' irf‘'Y .', - ; ..f -Mmi iTWIJiv •f.1 .' ' ■ . 1 ■ |■•yI•^^ W :■■.■• •>; AfVi'S* '.® ,;,k.(.. x'-' ■, ; , ^ X ‘■f ? iV% r'r< - ,1 - • “- w; ,/’" \ i' ■tt/Al!'* “Ai i, ' ., • ^-A»:i't. ; t'j _ v: . ■%■ V, ,i.S« 'JiW'i'*? . .-■L J* i;*!! Il j’ i ^ f ’.'±r -''iksh •■■ V*. ' . .; >5 ' . , ’‘^ V Aj.y.'V. ■ ill 'w ’ ''* '>*■ - •• ' - V2:,.. . ■ ■ -•'i-'. aLV.jL-.rf® . - . /yi.i' . .■ . i VITA. Educational Career - A. B. Simpson College 1916. M. S. University of Illinois 1918. Assistant in Chemistry, University of Illinois, 1917-1918; 1919-1920. Fellow in Chemistry, University of Illinois, 1920-1921. Publications - Studies in Uric Acid Metabolism. 2. Proteins and Amino Acids as Factors in the Stimula- tion of Endogenous Uric Acid Metabolism. Howard E. Lewis, Max S. Dunn and Edward A. Doisy. Journal of Biological Chemistry, Volume 36, 9 (1918).