.3 AN INVESTIGATION ON THE PRODUCTION OF LEAD ARSENATE BY ELECTROLYTIC METHOD BY ARATA LEO NITTA THESIS FOR THE DEGREE OF BACHELOR OF SCIENCE IN CHEMISTRY COLLEGE OF LIBERAL ARTS AND SCIENCES UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS 1922 ■* i. ■■■■• ' ■■ ■ " ‘■■'■'^•^^^W^i'f^''' '^■•®.<./. 1 ? ■■■W IlLHMft .~t. ^aS^^rn ^ ^ v f..lHl ■ , ■>?* ■ ''A\*^k\ ■i ■■■ rJ^MmWefr---': ’"'I > U . • I • <^.* ■ i\ v*^ ^ - rMfll - **^ ' i . .. , % ‘- « ,■ - .;• JKt' ^ t»wj UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS 1 191 THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE THESIS PREPARED UNDER MY SUPERVISION BY ENTITLED. IS APPROVED BY ME AS FULFILLING THIS PART OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF Instructor in Charge Approved : HEAD OF DEPARTMENT OF A''* I' ! *l - / ' V ^ rar''! r»««, wv \ - 1^ ■ ■i>^; »«L^ ‘( A" ;.}l;»- K f»^ i* ** ••A • •■ ,^,^>.4i.t.fl^tTl Ti^ ' '■ '■ ' :' ■ '"' : *«■•) - ’S'* “ ;,. 3Hr«wi «I /,Hj/ r : ~t_' FJ^aMT^ A4a(J Ho (3A3if >, ^ i-"- " > ,*t .M > ;iA ^5*ij>fci»eh9s»'jr>»r-4 ACniOwLEIiG-LIEIIT To Professor I'utnum, under Yvhose direction this investigation 'jvas carried out, the writer wishes to express his gratitude for many valuable suggestions and kind guidance. Thanks are also due hr. hiet- ricson , T;ho by furnishing necessary apparatus, has made the laboratory work possible. Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2015 https://archive.org/details/investigationonpOOnitt liJTROi^UCTIOK. The electrolytic process is a recent advancement on the manufacture of various pigments and some chemicals, x-ef erences : - ’'The i.i£,nufac tur e of Chemicals by Electrolysis" by x-.. y • Hale . "Electrolytic production of Yvhite lead, cadmuim yel- lo 7 /, of murcury vermillion, of ^icheele's green, and of Eerlin blue," in “x^perimentalElecti ochemistry" by rxop- kins , pp. I£E- i32. -several patents have been grantedon the manufacture of Yvhite leadby electrolysis. u . S . 644 , 7 7 6 1 19 uO ; by huckOYv . "fin Electrolytic xrocess for xvxanufacture of .-'hite xjead" , by .iilliams, -Rm. 9hem. xjOc . ( 189 5 ) p.8a5. Y "xrocess of -i.ianuf. -ixead salts b^ electrolysis U.S. 67 5, 455U90rjby d. B. Tibbits. "liethod of x.xanuf . of eeed salts by electrolysis U. X.. 1? 306,948 by e. narringt oni 1919 i . "..hite x.eo.d by xjlectr olysis " by n.?x . Bro'wn. u. e. 496,r09 and. 56a, 555. ^^nd several others. - 2 - It is claimed that the electrolytic production of vihite lead has a great advantages over the old proeer:ses of nutch, or -rench, o_ the '-^arterS. V/hy then the similar process can not be applied on the production of lead arsenater The inve^. tigation involves technical process based upon the chemical theories and the vvhole success moreover depends upon the economical standpoint o_ the manufacturing . in attacking tho problem it is veil, hovever, at the first hand to consider the successful production o: lead arsenate vithout considering all the economical factors involved. After finding the favorable cojnditions of itsmanufacture the economical features, such as the cost of rav materials, amount of energy to be consumed, the cost oi labor for the production, and the conditions should be considered, I'he sphere of the vork is vide and it requires a profound knovlvdge of electrochemistry coupled with an ability in doing researches. my work is simply a preliminary survey on the sub- ject ‘and 1 leave this work undone to a promising electro- chem.ist, r;ho may happen to bump on this stumbling block in some future days, i'he main influencing conditions on the process to be investigate are the f ollowings : - 1. I'lature of the electrolyte, 2. concentration of electrolyte u.:ed. 5. xemperature influences under which tfie. process lita .. V-.- —yt m . *. • >1 ' J k V-. ■>\4- • ' / V> ' S~ • j» K ^ * ' ‘ ‘ Vir •■ ' ' '• -'/Jrt . ' ' •* •*■ ‘'•’C*' -w ’ ' 'Vi > /' . . < ' ■ I Vi;*-. ^ ., \-\lm * ■ r r> 'v..-- \y f' i; A. ‘IF », ^ i - *./ ir w . - i ' 3 r ^ •’ - ' '* ■ '* '‘V ' ‘ ' '-''v^ ••■' ' '• wiai> - ' ii> 4 < :' '■' • % 'W' ^ „.42E ■ a ^ • ‘ . . . ■'» ’ -VpA i i i. • . ^ • ‘1 .- ' , ■V r •• • ' - ■/■ f*' »* . >i • , • . • f ^ .' u. ; '’^V’ /* .. 4 , ‘!.t #- < » ' O' ;* ‘aX ■ :k ■ 'V ' ^ S. ' ^ » ■ • \ ^ ' ■*“V i*. • • I ' 1 4 ' I ' 4 * •' ^ 'r* .4 ft ■ Jl# *v JUrfji^ . . MClr l^«.' n '* X ‘ : . . ' . . ‘ ■• ' • .'V ’• V ‘V ' . ■ s .■ ■ '>’ - .'^ - *" '■'•'-■/ VyRxy>:,v»' ... ■ - ", v^' ,!i* ’•' >' ‘ »,.l ) ' ' ■ ' ■>• . V’ - V;*^ , u , , .'•, ,,' ' ,/ fi' , .4'.i i’ ^ * •*,'.■ V ' ‘ii ,> ■ i/ M WBB. i.‘a~ • -'I,' J *.'' ^‘i. ■ » ' -;d- is worked. 4. .suitable materials for the electrode. 5. >^iiitable electrode area and current density. 6. iniuences of electrode portentials. 7... Specific gravity of electrodes before and after the electrolysis. 8. x^ature oi the precipitates obtained. 9. Economical investigation on the process, etc. j.iiix C2'TiinCiij Uii’ i.i'i kjjLjC • Cult ivc^tc d plL^nts are blvvays more susceptible to dis- ec.se and are attacked' by incects than are the Vv'ild plants. The more highly developed become our a^ricultuaip- oduc ts the more care i.-. necessary to protect them from agencies which will hinder their gro\;th. rhi.. ic the reason tha the manufacture of agricultual insecticides and fungicides has become the highly important industry. Classes ox .iii'd ihox.Ci]iOlJJij There s-ire two classes of insects; one ii. chewing insectsand the other is sucking in..ects. ^hewing insects bite or chew the foliage or fruit until they act- ually . destroy the plants. tiaterpillers o;. all kinds, beetles and cut worms are this type. These che'wing inoects are killed most easily by Lpraying the poison, u'.ually ar. enic compounds, oyer the plants. x-or this purpose lead arsenate, and recently calcium ar., enate are most successfully used. TO the latter class of insects belong various mites or scales and plant, lice. X’or /insecticide ox this class, it ic necessary to use .:ome materials which v.ill killby coming in contactwith the body of the insect, hicotine sulfate , lime sullur and some othbrs are used 7 ^, >:«» cy>’*' ■*>•*•' '<'^^\W'' *; • ■ « m ■ ' mm7*r ■ ■-‘ ■sa/it '■ .J'i ■• >■.' , US/ .'^Iv ':- ■^:'.v .‘V ^ • V •/ .- ‘^’ ■■ h ..Jfiip' . • ^ ,,■ i,: ‘ ''■■:i'M' '■."■• '-^- yilSh ' • ••-■ ' '-Mi ’•^. • JE-V „. v. ’- . 1 ^ 1 .. ' jL ''*' ■ ■■ : '■■v*S! '.'.li ^ ■'' ,r^^'-'V’^p'V Jfej WmC :. . .. •• ,' .;*# £ i •■■ .‘.'I '"■- K*» - V^' 'A . - -• ^ ,• 'u.' l' ' y ' '•■;■ [ «*! Kixli Oxu^ u li'. 01:' Ut-'xj Oi}' J.is Kj vJ ’J?X O -LLi Ij1\ X 'i'1-.lJ »j Xii. i.'i-ii-' * X'he insecticide business got its reaX start when 'the ooXoro-do potato beetXe took up its ^journey eastward and began infesting the potato fieXdin the eastern part of the country. J-t i found that aceto- arsensfce of cop>per or -faris green, whiich is used as a green pigment, couXd be used on tlie potato vines with good effect. • 9 Oonsiderabie success Y/as met with and befor Xong tb.e use of arsenic compounds in paint became unpopuXar and Y^arious chrome greens took tlieir place with the resuXtt that for many years tlie production of raris green has been practical ly for . insecticide use only. s^radually tliis ..was tried for another plants , but the soluble portion of tXie arsenic was absorbed by tlie plants and burning effect on plant v.'as marked. At tlie- time of the gipsy moth outbreak in iviassachusetts , it Yvas suggested that arsenate of lead contained very little v^ater solubleax'oenic , might be used to advantage. it was tried out and , found suitable in many Yvays for this purj^ose. hesiaesb being insoluble and tb.us practically harmless to very tender foliage, it also had another a'dvantage over la.ris green in that, in its linely devided form after drying from the sprs.y soj.ution, it adheres to the leaves and was not readily washed of.J by the, rain, ^irsenate of lead, hence, grew in popularity. j-t could be usea - 6 - on neary all foliages without donger of burning and v;ould cling to the vines or to the foriage through several rain storms, and has a high killingn power. bTjiUiii Ci' i.uh'i Lh ^j.C TUxLij Gi ari~enaoe , useu up do -lGOG , was pi'epareo. at home by each user without much or any chemical knowledge mostly by mixing the solutions of sodium arsenate and lead acetate. ''ihis precipitated lead arsenateand the whole mixture was then poured into the spray tank for the use. IhlTI^J. IhbaCflClhli IhLUbfRY. The first successful commercial manufacture was carried out by Gornelius h. Yreeland of iviontelair, h. J. In February, ±906, he made application lor a patent covering an electrolytic method of preparing ar- enic compound of lead, U. 0. 870, 9i£ (1906) for s veral years his " hlectro " brand manufactured in a little plant in I'otowa just outside of rat ter son, i. . J. was the be. t known in the market. I'he process was , how- ever, abondoned by his firm. ■ rhe method of precipitation of lead arsenate by sodium arsenate and lead acetate, wlilch wasv then being by several small x^lants, was expensive. ^irsenic acid and litharge are fairly cheap raw materials, iixtensive experiment on the use of the said compounds start- -7- ecland _inally came out as a commercial product. Cliom. Let. ■^ng.__24, I19k1A1 ju > fhe larger part, probablymore than three fourths of the arsenate of lead .produced in this country, is made by the interaction of arsenic acid and litharge. 'i'herej are t’v^o distict methods of manufacturing • - one being a 'wet process and the other , 'which is rather a recent invention, being dry method, fry methods'. - 8. 2: 1,544,055 I 1920 j by 1. Eedenburg and f* 2* fx’att . b. 2. 1,17 5,565 by n. 2hepherd, 1 1916 J -9- ind. and o^ng. Chern. lb, (19211 p. 551. ilie ra\7 materials commonly used , due to the cheapness are litharge and white arsenic. wome processes, howerver, claim certain advantages in using lead nitrate , white lead, lead peroxide, and lead acetate. Current Quotations on rrices of haw Ivlaterials Used. by carlot less carlot nitharge per lb. 0.07 I/2--.O8 .081/e--.09 ■.ihite arsenic " . O6---.06I/4 .06 1/e--.o7 nead nitrate ” . .15 .20 ^ead acetate " .10 5/8--. 12 1^ head arL^enate i paste .09--. 09 1/2 .010 .0.11 i^ead arsenate ” .06 l/ 2 .o7 .07 1/2-.O6 I in powder/ uodium nitrate" .025 .026 Ohem. het . -^^ng. Oiiipt. 1921. •jodium arsenate per lb. 0.76 Quoted from price li^t of Hillinckrodt Ohem- ical .-orks Q921i 8odium arsen'ate 0« 1. per lb, yO.52 j. B.hake:^ Chemical company. - 10 - '•'lii \ ^ij'ps.ratus u>: ed , - iinipmeter-- west on direct reading: ampmeter, hi'.vinp rea0-in£, ox x«3 a*-*piiieterx’ • ivheos tat --(Carbon rheostt-t. Toltmeter-rreston direct cu.rrent voltmeter having 5 ang 10 volts oi reading. ^l;.ctrodes used--v-arbon , iron, lead, ana copper. Cell iar-- One liter beaker is used. -diaphragm-- porous porcelain cup. iource OI electricity — xrorn 110 volt direct current, kiagreim of a,H;'aratus . - 11 - i~*iA -L Hl XIkjJ *1^] 1 1* Ihe first epperiment based upon the theory of preci- pitation of insvoluble lead arsenate in contact with arsenate ion from soluble arc-encite salts with lead ion electrolytically set free from the lead anode. i‘he commonly known salts such as sodium arsenate and sodium biarsenate are.; tried. ihe different kinds and different concentrations of electrolytes, various electrodes, and the effects upon the precipitation with various curi'ent densities were tested. ihe following experiments were performed under fixed conditions only varying the electrolyte and its con- centrations. Ihe fixed conditions are klect :|iodes , -*-^athode , - Cu rlate whose area being l.V dm. sq. i:..node , --xb . plate v;hose area being 2.6 dm . s q . Current density,- 0.5 amp. per sq. dm. ■temperature,- -o.t room temperature. Duration of run,- 30 minutes, Ei.periment 1. rllectrode used ,- sodium biarsenate. Concentration,- 5 per cent solution. Observation, - ■uydrogen gas from the cathode, uxygen from the anode. - 12 - iio precipitate Vvas obtained. i!it;periinent 2. Electrode used,- Sodium arsenate. Concentration,- 5 per cent solution, observation ,- evolution oi tlie gases as in the preceding exp. ho precipitation was obtained. Experiment 3. Eliectrolyte used,- Codium biarsenate, ooncentration, - 10 per cent solution, observation. - oame as the precedings. -experiment 4. -electrolyte used,- oodium arsenate, ooncentration, - 10 per cent solution, observation,- oame as the precedings. ihe affect of secondary *jalts. 'fhe effect of the presence of secondary salt in iiie electrolyte was tested, as it was suggested by o* i'. Carrier. He succesfully used sodium chlorate or sodium acetate in the preparation of white lead from sodium carbonate solution with lead anode. ■J. -^'hys . ohem. ^1909; 3^, -i-p.256 and 3o2. -13- -LTans. -L:^lectro. '-^hem.uoc. il904; p. 229, u, S.644, 779 ly xacliard and iloepper. iixperrment 5. ^'’lectrolyte used,- 50 parts oi' 5 per cent of sodiua arsenate 50 " '• ” " ” " sodium chlorate ubservation, - Oases from the both electrodes, ho sign of precipitation. Experiment 6. xilectrolyte used,- 50 parts of 5 per cent ol sodium acetate. 50 2 " " ■' souium arsenate ubservation, - ^ame as the preceding. ifeperiment 7 , electrolyte used,- 20 parts of 5 per cent o_ sodium arsenate 40 ■■ " " “ ” sodium acetate. 40 " " " " sodium chlorate. Observation, - eame as the preceding. -14- Summary ox experiment e-eries 1. exp . Electrolyte , eoneent. ulservation. Precipitation. 1 x^ia^ n As 5/0 sol. uases evolut . no. from electrodes. 2. i'ia^-ii-s 0^ 5 7^ sol . «( 2. na^A asu^ 10 70 sol . ( < > * 4. i^a^As 10 7^ sol . II )• 5. ^ parts of ix a^-^s 5 70. 50 *■ " l^a.^1 5 /o. 6. 50 parts of i^aAs 5 7*?. 50 ~ " i^a COUCH 5 'jo 7. 20 pts. of iiaa^is L-v 40 ■' “ Ka oOuCH 40 " '■ -tia CLO3 -15- I'he conditions being the same, the effect on various concentrations of electrolyte -was tested. rsperiment 1. i:ilectrolyte , -500 CG. Of 1 )o of ha^Agi^ .^ol. observation, - ihe gases from the both electrodes, no precipitation. iiixperiment 2. --fter 15 minutes of electrolysis of the experiment 1,5 grams of sodium arsenate is added. j-he observation and the results are the same. experiment 5. nfter 15 minutes of electrolysis of experioient 2, 5 grams of sodium arsenate is added. observation,- Ko precipitation, but slightlty cloudy. Experiment 4. Ihe filtrate of the experiment ef 2 is electrolyzed for 15 minutes after addition of 5 grams of sodium arse- nate , ob.. ervation, - Became very much cloudy. .•«eight of the precipitate obtained 0.1042 gm. -16- ikperinaent 5. ^ftei" 15 minutes of electrolysis of experiment ’ 4, filtered. i'o filtrare 5 grams of sodium arsenate is added, and electrolyzed. ubservation, - i^o precipitation. Experiment 6 . ^ After 15 minutes of electrolysis, 10 grams of sodium arsenate is added. Eo precipitation. / jSxperiment 7 . After 15 minutes of electrolysis, 15 grams of sodium arsenate is added. bo changes from the preceding experiment observed. ^ Summary for the experiment series 2. ■fhe small amount of precipitation vv^as obtained in experiment 3 and 4, vvhose concentrations are 3 and 4 respeclr ively . -17- 1 bEi\Ixj3 3, The effect of the varying proportion and the concentrations of the electrolyte and of the secondary salts is determined. The fixed conditions are the same with series 1 experiment. The quantity of electrolyte taken in each exp- eriment is 500 CC. The electrolyte was kept in acidic codition with nitric acid and indicator, in order to prevent the formation of basic lead salt. iiir is bubbled through the electrolyte in order to stir the precipitates formed. Experiment 1. electrolyte,- 2pts of S of sodium arsenate. 3 “ "5 " ” pottasium chlorate. observation, - Voltage drop, -5.0 v. initial, o,S v. final, hydrogen gas from the cathode and precipitat cling to the anode. .weight of precipitate obtained after 30 minutes of run, 2.3830 gm. experiment 2. Electrolyte,- 2 pts. of of sodium arsenate. 3 " “5 /u " pottasium chlor- • ■ o' .' -'*■' f ' .*‘ -, .:• ’ ^ ‘jI > ^ 5 ^' *' ■' V-*’*' O’ TjJk'- ow^hmK. . ■ ',' •■■ .V .';. •■. .! Jh " 2 ^ ■ ■■'■•• ' -^ ■ ' *^' ft j >■ . . ' ■ '-t M Og •■■=^^.<' ■•■ #- M'' [ O.-- :'. i.^^S ..® «, ^ >• r*" »■ fc. ► r*" »■ -, , • .’•a.: ' -V rj . k .'l: ■ A. V-...^>A- ^ JlmK ■■■ ' 1 .'^:- o--.. , ' .. . f ; :-. - t jj' . It '•(,& SL_ij>v.. ■ • •-■ ..■i.L.x^ : V4' ► J' ' t ' : M -M ?$a , . ■?f( ■-• f >■ • '>v w) ^ -• *irj«»wi » ■ '>v l|M ^ i* '■ jtf?l '•' • 'j; ,; .1 Si t ■ I 1 'K-sje«M- ' '^''' • y.J!,' • . *■ •'] r-j: :U:?< ■'! - ,!v %rf I ' ■ .• ( ' . .,.'* •«\Lw*i ■ * ‘ ‘ ■ ■■'♦ 4tf ' fit <4pt>yir9 -18- ate « Voltage drop,- initial ^.8 v. final 5.£ v. Wt . of precipitation obtained, 3.7825 gni. j-ixperiment 5. i^lectrolyte ,- 2 pts . of 10 )o gol. of sodium arsenate. 5 ”5 ” ” "-t— clilorate. Voltage drop,- initial 4,7 V. final 6.8 v. V/eight of precipitation , 2.7 572 gm. experiment 4. Ohanging the concentration of n-chlorate. Electrolyte, -t 2 pts. of 2>1o^ Of n- chlorate. I 3” " ” 5 " " sodium arsenate. Voltage drop,- rnitial 7.0 v. final 7.9 y. weight of precipitate obtained , 2.0 876 gm. Experiment 5. Electrolyte,- I 2 pts. of 6 E of n-chlorate. I3 ” "5 " " Eodium arsenate. initial voltage ^rop, 4.9 y. , final 5.5 y. v.eight 0- precipitate obtained, 2,2564 gm. Experiment 6, Electrolyte,- I 2 pts. of 10 Of h- chlorate. 15 •’ ” 5 > " sodium arsenate. Initial voltage drop 4.9 v., final 5.5 v. i/eight of precipitate obtained 2,3605 gm. -19- iiixperiment 7. increasing amount oi i^- clilorcite. illectrolyte , - 1 Spts. oi 10 'jo of chr orate. (2 " ” 5 ” sodium arsenate. Voltage drop, initial 8.2 v. , final 8.6 v. ./ei^ht of precipitation obtained 5. 6542 gm. i^xperiment 8 . -Electrolyte t 4 pts. or 10 of -S- -clilorate sol. I 1 " “ 5 '■ " sodium arsenate. voltage drop,- initial 2.6 v. , linal «i>.6 v. ..eight of precipitate 1.5582 gm. EULlIAxvY pa. . IKE EAPEi.ILIElvi' s El k 1 iii kj if 3 • iJxp. hlectro- Oonc. lyte . Eroport . Voltage init . drop, linal. ' 5t . of ppt. 1 . 1 Ua^AsO^ ( h CIO 3 "d^/o 5 “ 2 pts. 5 " 5.0 6 .3 2.3820 gm 2 . 1 lias -^s (h C 1 O 3 6 5 2 n Ets . 5 3.8 5.2 5.7825 " 5 . ( i'ia 3 .‘.^s • 0 ^ ( n 010 ^ 10 5 '■ Cj p>t S . 4.7 5.8 2.7572 " 4. 1 JiCl L| (lJa 3 As 5 /J 5 •' 2 " 5 ■■ 7.0 7.9 2.0876 " 5. [ X- 01. 3 6 >0 5 " 2 pts 5 . 4.7 5.9 2.2564 6 . 1 ir 01 C 3 (hajAso^ lo P 5 " 2 pts . rr 1 - 0 4.9 5 . 5 2.3605 7 . 1 A Cl O 3 (IIe^xsO^ lo 5 " 3 i>ts 2 " . 8.2 8.6 3.6542 8 . IACIO 3 10 '^ 0 4 pts 2.6 5. 6 1.3382 - 20 - ■i U/ i ^ jCi-fc X b X j-j ■■i.’'he e:^Lperiment Vvc s done , using th.e method of Vreeland's patent. 870,915 I 1908J he u. ed a cathode of iron in a solution of alkaline hydrozide contained ij. a porou.s receptacle, uhich in turn vv-as placed ir a vessel containing an anode of lead and a solution of a salt v;hieh v;hen electrolyzed vill produce a soluble lead salt. ^-ead aricenate is formed by means of a soluble s.ult o: arsenic. fhe reactions involves iij the; reactions are x-a"^ goes into the cathode__ ^ i.a + 0 i-a reacts with the water — yh^-t '-h -b x.Oj by electrolysis — ^ ^^b'^ + 1 X 3 fo the above solution sodium ^ rsen- te ie added, i'b IhOj s " . fliio sodium t.nd nitrate are again used as anode solution in the next operation. rhis xrocess , therefore , is simply the electrolytic p eduction of lead nitrate. fhe conditions fixed for the ■■•xporiaient are -electrolyte , -rahO in anode and in eatiiodc comT'^c^rtments . Concentration,- 5 per cent solution of ei^cli. -.lectrodes , - 1 ^-node,- o-o;.. d plate who-o area { L.'vj Sg. I (cathode,- xron bar .■vhose area 1.7 ar.i . j • J. "V f ^ V 4 / ^ , V • ‘ • /■ f ’ • A ' <■ 1 • ^ iBii V J. ' '’ M-, , •* M ^ • ' • ' ■■ 4 " ^ 4 ■# . ■ V ‘ ^ -tv* . >■ 'l^-' ,' ^ •' , •;?, *v^ lU '> ^' ■ .Vf'i *^ii • ‘ IfjUl ■S.' I T *' i' k. ii.)*; : 1 , -f.i ff. .Ji ■ I . ■• * ' ‘ • ». ■*/? !<« jk-' ■l>- fV.Vr 4 ^, ■ . , .' : 1. !v:< V,i ’'■' ' ’’. ® V ‘'' ? ■' ■ ; *.^ ..•/"•■'WdEl/’J iS’i • * li ^ -' J/ ' ^ Y *•* •■ •>j-’i'l| f'** |k' P ''#4^ **■! * '^Pl- • V. . ' u > . . . - li.i. A- *-( ■ A I - •?' /!**^*^' 7 ,’ ' 4( M ;,' ..'Sg ^ « 'mC 'y' ’' t~ ' -,’ vaSI'V '■■‘.'.V V?t»' ’"' '■ .'if f.'i^ ■‘'i .'V •: :MfX. yii» y' -*fJ9K4 '.■j!* , . ■?' 'jti 1 , i ' ' !f . ( . * 1 '. , < 4 ' Vtl - 21 - Liurrent o.eiisity,- 0.5ci. amp, per sq. dm. Duration oi run,- 30 minutes, rafter tlie i-un in each experiment, 10 percent solution of sodium arsenate is added until! the solution is salsurated and teh solution is filtered, the precipitate then dried and weighed. iiixperiment 1. 500 Of 5 percent of sodium nitrate solution is taken • .^eig,ht of the precipitate obtained--? .3167' gm. i^pE riment 2. ' 'fhe filtrate from the experiment 1 is again electro- lyzed for 30 minutes , and saturated with sodium arsenate, the precipitate Vvas filtered and neighed. uei, ht of ppt.-- 10. 176 5 gm. « Experiment 3. ■ihe filtrate of experiment 2is electrolysed, and the precipitatev;as w-eighed. weight of precipitate — 10.6382 gm. Th.e process goes indefinitely by addition of sodium arsenate, the weights of precipitate obtained aie 7.2167 gm. , 10.1765 gm., and 10.6382 gm.respec tively . ju iiiXt -L ^ j-j - fc Xi-* 5 • I'he effect o^. various catliodes vas examined, file fixed c ond i t i ons a r e Electrolyte,- 5 per cent of sodium arsenate, current density, -0.5 amp. sg. dm. l>urration of run,- 20 minutes. Ex p e r imen t 1 . nlectrode used,- lEad catliode liaving area of 2.3 sq. dm. Voltage drop,- initial 6.8 v., final 6.4 v. ./eiglit of precipitate,- 1.8226 gm. Experiment 2. x^lectrode, - Liarbon -whose solution area o.74 sq. dm. Electrode portential,- initial 9,0 , final 8.6 v. ..eight of precipitate,- 4.Y858 gm. Experiment 5. electrolyte,- copper plate vdiose area 1.7 sq. dm. electrode portential,- initial 9.0, final 8,6 v. weight of precipitate,- 5.0'. 42 gm. Experiment 4. Electrode,- iron rod nhOoe.. electrode area being 0.7 sq. dm. Electrode portential,- initial 12.0 v. rinal 10,8 v. ./eight of precipitate obtained,- 1.5350 gm. u]? ' 5. Carbon electrode gave the best yield and copi-er also hi fx value under the given condition. iron and lead gave very lov value. 1. ii^luenceB of different el^-ctrodes for the pre- cipitation. und( rthe same condition, b y changing electrode, variable precipitate was obtainedas sho..n in the er^eii- ment series 6. 2. i^iffect of change concentration in the electrolyte. There is an optinum concentration for the precip- tation under each condition. The conditions may in-, elude current density, various cathodes, nature of electroly tempreture of the bath and Some others. onder the condition o experiment series 2, the conc' ntration of S or 4 percent was found as the best suited. 5. rnfluence of the secondary salts. As to the possible explanation of the. function of secondary salt presented, a. ihe presence of the secondary salt increases the conductivity of theelectr olyte . D . ■fliis in turn acceleratesthe speed of lead going into the ionic form. c. 'The ionized lead will o^uickly take up arsenate ion forming insoluble lead arsenate. 3 -25- d. This conseauently increases the dissociation of .:odiiiai arsenate used. e. As inference, the secondary salt, therefore, should be highly ionisable salts. 4. The use of soluble salts of arsenate. ns industrial process the use of soluble salts of arsenate is seems to me impossible, owing to the high cost of arsenate salt. i5y this very reason Vreeland, the inventor of electrolysis method, has abondoned his proerss as soon as the other process, which use cheaper ravv material for the manufacture of lead arsenate .came into enistence. As ascientific investigatio n this is an interesting subject. The sturdy may lead to establish some theories which may be applicable to similar reactions. The use of cheaper raw materials, such as white arse- t nic , litharge, minium, or galena is essential .or the develo merit of lead arsenate industry.- from this standpoint, it may be well to investigate on electrolysis of fused white ar; enic and lead salts. ur it may be advantagious to pass electric current through mf?:ed vapor phases, as these arsenic and lead salts are easily sublimed at a fairly low temperature